alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1633 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1633

  To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to allow certain payments 
    made by public service employees to qualify for public service 
                   repayment, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2021

 Mr. Foster (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. 
Norton, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Mr. Carson, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. 
   Keating, and Ms. Wexton) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to allow certain payments 
    made by public service employees to qualify for public service 
                   repayment, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Service Loan Forgiveness 
Inclusion Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. QUALIFYING PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 455(m) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(A) by inserting ``subject to paragraph 
        (5),'' before ``has made''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) First 60 monthly payments.--
                    ``(A) In general.--For the purpose of meeting the 
                requirement under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), 
                the first 60 monthly payments may be payments under a 
                repayment plan under subsection (d)(1) or (g).
                    ``(B) Applicability.--This paragraph shall apply to 
                borrowers who on or after the date of the enactment of 
                this paragraph have made less than 120 monthly payments 
                under paragraph (1)(A).''.
    (b) Notification to Borrowers.--Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education shall--
            (1) inform each borrower of a loan made under part D of 
        title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a 
        et seq.) of--
                    (A) paragraph (5) of section 455(m) of the Higher 
                Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)), as amended 
                by this Act; and
                    (B) the effect of such paragraph on loan 
                cancellation under such section 455(m) (20 U.S.C. 
                1087e(m)); and
            (2) provide information to such borrowers on how to change 
        repayment plans.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2005295EN.01000701.xml

| 11.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 295/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 295/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1829/2005

of 10 November 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 12th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 12th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 41,360 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 November 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

2

---
**COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**

 

**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of Comprehensive CareCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 2008 (the “Report”), John M. Hill, as Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

25
# sim3145_appendix-1
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Senior Airman JACOB A. ATKINSON
United States Air Force

ACM 38617

16 April 2015

Sentence adjudged 8 April 2014 by G CM convened at Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota . Military Judge: Natalie Richardson (sitting alone).

Approved S entence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 15 months

, and reduction to E

- 2

.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Judith A. Walker and Major Thomas A. Smith

.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire

.

Before

MITCHELL, WEBER, and CONTOVEROS Appellate Military Judges

OPINION OF THE COURT

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent

under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4

.



### WEBER , Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court

- martial convicted the appellant

, consistent with his ple as, of one specification of knowingly and wrongfully possessing child pornography, and one specification of knowingly and wrongfully viewing such material, both in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The military judge sentenced the appellant to a bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 15 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E

- 2. The convening authority disapproved

the forfeitures but otherwise approved the sentence as adjudged.ACM 38617 2 

### The appellant submitted this case to t he court without alleging any specific error.

We note one issue in the record of trial that merits discussion but no relief.

Child Pornography Files

In sentencing, the government called an expert witness in the field of computer

forensic examination. The expert laid the foundation for the prosecution to admit without objection Prosecution Exhibit 1, a compact disc that purported to contain eight videos of child pornography found on the appellant’s computer. While the record does not make this point expli cit, it appears these are the eight videos the appellant

, in his providence inquiry

, admitted to possessing and viewing.

The disc labeled as Prosecution Exhibit 1 in the record of trial only contains seven

videos. One of these videos could not be viewed; it could be opened using a standard media player, but no video image appear ed . Despite this, we find no relief is warranted. The appellant was not charged with possessing or viewing child pornography on divers occasions; thus, the conviction remains leg ally and factually sufficient even if he only possessed and viewed the six files we reviewed instead of eight. We also find the appellant’s sentence appropriate despite this matter.

Conclusion

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and f act, and no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c)

. Accordingly, the findings and the

sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

STEVEN LUCAS

Clerk of the Court
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-03883 |
|------------------------------------|-----------|

 

DWS Communications Fund, Inc.

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 12/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 12/31/08 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

----
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   November      5, 2008 | By:    | /s/      Jeffry E. Sterba                 |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                         |   | Jeffry      E. Sterba                     |
|                                         |   | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                         |   | PNM      Resources, Inc.                  |
|                                         |   |                                      |

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of PMX Communities, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Michael C. Hiler
                                 ----------------------
                                 Michael C. Hiler
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2011
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. In the Interest of William B. SHAY, a child, Appellee.

No. T-230.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 25, 1973.

Donald G. Nichols, and Roger D. Merriam, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Donald W. Matthews, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See State v. Steinhauer, 216 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1968).

RAWLS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.3**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/Jeffry                E. Sterba                  |
|---------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | Jeffry                E. Sterba                     |
|                                  |   | Chairman,                President and              |
|                                  |   | Chief                Executive Officer              |
|                                  |   | Public                Service Company of New Mexico |
#### Wilburn C. MEEKS v. Mrs. Gladys D. HUGHES.

No. 45516.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 24, 1969.

Walker, Franks, Rone & Bridgforth, Hernando, for appellant.

Wall Doxey, Jr., Holly Springs, for ap-pellee.

BRADY, Justice:

This case was appealed from the Circuit Court of Marshall County, Mississippi. Appellant alleges that he was injured in an automobile collision when the car which he was driving was struck from the rear by ap-pellee’s vehicle. The case was tried and submitted to a jury which returned a verdict for the appellee herein.

A careful review of the record in this cause, together with the instructions, leads us to conclude that although the instructions received by both participants in this litigation are far from perfect we cannot say that the jury was misled thereby so as to render an unjust verdict under all of the evidence presented. Therefore, under Rule 11 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Mississippi it does not affirmatively appear, from the whole record, that the judgment which was rendered in this case has resulted in a miscarriage of justice. Therefore, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Marshall County is affirmed.

Affirmed.

GILLESPIE, P. J., and RODGERS, JONES and INZER, JJ., concur.
#### John T. COCKRELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 37917.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 8, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 23, 1970.

Charles D. McClure, of McClure, Wig-ginton & McClure, Tallahassee, and John W. Harrell, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., .and Horace A. Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., THORNAL, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., and RAWLS, District Court Judge, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29468]



[[Page 60249]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Head Start Program Information Report (PIR).
    OMB No.:  0980-0017.
    Description: The Head Start Act requires that the Program 
Information Report (PIR) information is collected from Head Start 
grantees and delegate agencies. Data elements are primarily in the 
areas of management, class activity, health profile and home 
environment. Principle user of the date include local program 
management, ACF regional management, ACYF central office management, 
management of services to children with disabilities, and dissemination 
to other interested parties.
    Respondents: Head Start Grantees and Delegate Agencies.

                                             Annual Burden Estimates                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Number of      Average burden                 
                 Instrument                      Number of      responses per      hours per       Total burden 
                                                respondents       respondent        response          hours     
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PIR.........................................           2,078                4             3.35            6,691 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 6,691.
    Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Information Services, Division of Information Resource 
Management Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
    OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the 
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of 
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best 
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office 
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, Attn: Ms. Wendy Taylor.

    Dated: November 3, 1997.
Bob Sargis,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-29468 Filed 11-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
Emission reductions from GA EPD CMAQ and HPP Locomotive conversions

Emissions are considered to be constant (hourly, year-round). Let me know if you need more specific timing on when projects will be phased in.

**Emission Reduction Emission Reduction**  **DPM  ** NOx** **DPM  ** NOx** 2015 Atlanta $24,000,000 9.56 **190.78** 95.59 1907.75Mostly Fulton, also Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, and Gwinnett 2015 Macon $6,200,000 2.20 38.93 22.00 389.30Mostly Bibb, also Crawford, Houston, Monroe, Jones, Peach, or Twiggs 2015 Rome $900,000 0.68 **8.42** 6.77 84.24 Floyd 2016 Atlanta $12,000,000 4.78 95.39 47.80 953.88Mostly Fulton, also Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, and Gwinnett 2016 Macon $1,800,000 0.64 11.30 6.39 113.02 Bibb

*match funding not included **Diesel Particulate Matter (assume PM2.5) Note that locomotive fleet turnover should improve other emissions by the time these phase out. Total NOx Reductions in Gasoline Marketing Area: **199.20 tons/year**  **10 year (tons)** 

**Estimate for remaining funds Expected start years**  reductions may be partial the first year (if not all introduced

by Jan) **Annual (tons)**  **Railyard Areas**  **Public Funding***

**($)**
<PAGE>

                 COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Comprehensive Care
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 11, 2003 (the
"Report"), Robert J. Landis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                       /s/ Robert J. Landis
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert J. Landis
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       April 11, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Comprehensive Care Corporation and will be retained by Comprehensive
Care Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       24