alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-1223 

________________________________________________________________________ 

JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE 

Passenger Name Record 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SWITZERLAND 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Bern December 23, 2008 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
SWITZERLAND 

Judicial Assistance: Passenger Name Record 

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at 

 Bern December 23, 2008; 

 Entered into force December 23, 2008.
#### Cleo Allen BUTLER, Individually and Cleo Allen Butler, For and on Behalf of her minor daughter, Michelle Butler v. FLINT-GOODRIDGE HOSPITAL OF DILLARD UNIVERSITY, Dr. Jerome Medley and Dr. Warren P. McKenna, Jr.

No. 61695.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Cleo Allen Butler et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 354 So.2d 1070.

Writ denied. The validity of the recovery limitation is not before the court at this time.
1 - 2

Attention: Waste Reduction and Management Division Environment Canada 14th Floor, Place Vincent Massey 351 St-Joseph Blvd. Gatineau Québec K1A 0H3

CONFIRMATION OF DI SPOSAL OR RECYCLING

As required under Part 6, paragraphs 36(1)( a )( b )( c ), and subsections 36(2), and 36(3) of the Export and Import of Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Recyclable Material Regulations, this certificate is provided as a confirmation of disposal or recycling.

The authorized facility where final di sposal or recycling took place:

Name___________________

_______________________ _________________ Site address_________________

________________________ _____________ City & Province/Territory

______________________ _______________________ State & Country, ZIP/Postal Code______________

_______________________ The following list includes al l hazardous waste(s), or haz ardous recyclable material(s), that have been disposed of, or recycled, by t he disposal and/or re cycling operation(s) shown below:

Movement document Notice (found on permit) Date of operation Method of disposal or

recycling Quantity

Reference

Number Line # Reference Number Line # (dd/mm/yyyy) (i.e. D3, R4) (kg or l)2 - 2

Movement document Notice (found on permit) Date of operation Method of disposal or

recycling Quantity

Reference

Number Line # Reference Number Line # (dd/mm/yyyy) (i.e. D3, R4) (kg or l)

I hereby confirm that the hazar dous waste(s), or hazardous recyclable material(s), listed herein have been disposed of, or recycled, as intended in the specified notice(s). I certify that the information provided with res pect to Part 6, subsection 36(2) to the Export and Import of Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Recyclab le Material Regulations is accurate and complete.

Printed Name______

________________________ _______________ _____________

Title____________________

__________________ __________________ __________

E-mail___________________

____________________ _________________________

Phone___________________ _________ Fax__________

______________________

________________________ ______ _________________ ________________ Signature of authorized responsible Date company representative
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT July Term 2014

CARLOS A. CAJIGAS CORTES
,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 2142

[ August 6, 2014 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert E. Belanger

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562010CF260A

.

Carlos A. Cajigas Cortes, Zephyrhills, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

We affirm the trial court order denying appellant’s habeas corpus petition, in which he asked to file a belated rule 3.850 motion for post

conviction relief. Appellant also sought a belated appeal, which is not properly requested in the trial court. The request must be file d in the appellate court by timely petition under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). However, appellant has filed two such petitions in this court and they have been dismissed by orders as deficient and untimely

in case numbers 4D13

- 4011 and 4D13

- 4656. Thus, to the extent he intends this appeal to be a petition for belated appeal, it is also dismissed as untimely.

Appellant is cautioned against the filing of future frivolous post

conviction or appellate filings in this case, as such filings will result in sanctions including referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings and/or a prohibition against pro se filings in this court. See State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

Affirmed; appellant cautioned against frivolous filings.2

S TEVENSON

, G ERBER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 31.1.1

Certification

I, Hank J. Ratner, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Madison Square Garden, Inc.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date:  April 1, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Hank J. Ratner                   
|                     |  |  |  | Hank J. Ratner                       
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2005222EN.01002201.xml

| 27.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 222/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 222/22

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1414/2005

of 26 August 2005

on the issue of import licences for garlic imported under the autonomous tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1320/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1320/2005 of 11 August 2005 opening and providing for the administration of an autonomous tariff quota for garlic (1), and in particular Article 6(3) thereof,

Whereas:

Licence applications submitted by traditional and new importers to the competent authorities of the Member States pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1320/2005, exceed the available quantities. The extent to which licences may be issued should therefore be determined,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences made by traditional importers pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1320/2005 and submitted to the Commission by the Member States on 24 August 2005 shall be issued for 2,539 % of the quantity applied for.

2.   Applications for import licences made by new importers pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1320/2005 and submitted to the Commission by the Member States on 24 August 2005 shall be issued for 0,766 % of the quantity applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 August 2005.

It shall apply until 31 December 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 August 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 210, 12.8.2005, p. 17.

1

---
**MEMORANDUM**

**Date:** December 11, 2013 **Subject:** Acry lic and Modacrylic Fibers Production Risk Modeling File **From:** Nick Parsons, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/RCG **To:** EPA Docket File (EPA - HQ - OAR - 2012

– 0133 ) The attached “Mact_1001.zip” file contains the emissions inventory used for the risk modeling of the Acry lic and Modacrylic Fibers Production (AMF) source category . Ma ct _1001. zi p The attached “AMF HEM Inputs MACT Level.zip” file contains the Human Exposure Model (HEM) inputs for emissions from AMF proces ses at facilities in the AMF source category . AM F HEM Input s MA CT Le vel .z ip The attached “AMF HEM Inputs Whole Facility .zip” file contains the HEM inputs for facility wide emissions from facilities in the AMF source category . AM F HEM Input s Whol e Fac ilit y.z ip
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Floyd F. Chadee, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 8, 2008



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|/s/    FLOYD F.
CHADEE                                           
|Floyd F. Chadee Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of
Periodic Financial Report Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  Each
of the undersigned officers of Dyax Corp. (the Company) certifies, under the
standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.   Dated:
  March 3, 2009
  /s/
  Gustav A. ChristensenGustav
  A. ChristensenChief
  Executive OfficerDated:
  March 3, 2009
  /s/
  George MigauskyGeorge
  MigauskyChief
  Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2003, of El Paso CGP Company (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, D.
Dwight Scott, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify (i)
that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ D. Dwight Scott
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           D. Dwight Scott
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)

                                           August 14, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso CGP Company and will be retained by El Paso CGP Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Burnie Vance SPROUSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-698.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 4, 1970.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Vaughn J. Rudnick, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Evan KRAUS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40821.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 12, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May. 12, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 243 So.2d 214.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.16(c)  


 
 

AMENDMENT TO CERTAIN STOCK PLANS    
  


        Pursuant to Board of Directors action taken September 2002, the following amendment was approved in respect of the following plans: 




1999
Broad-Based Employee Stock Option Plan,

1987 Stock Option Plan,

1997 Stock Option Plan; and

Galileo International 1999 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan 





        Notwithstanding
any other provision of this plan to the contrary, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Cendant Corporation shall have the authority to grant hereunder
to eligible persons such awards ("Special Awards") which are either actual shares of common stock of Cendant Corporation, or are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based upon or
denominated by, shares of common stock of Cendant Corporation. Upon vesting or delivery, such Special Awards may be settled by Cendant Corporation by delivering either cash or shares of common stock
of the Corporation, and/or may be subject to voluntary or mandatory deferral, in accordance with such terms, conditions and elections that the Compensation Committee determines in its sole and
absolute discretion. The terms, conditions and timing of Special Awards, including conditions and restrictions applicable to vesting and/or whether the vesting or granting of such awards will be
subject to performance criteria, and the persons to whom such awards shall be granted, shall be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole and absolute discretion. It is intended that the
Compensation Committee be provided maximum flexibility with respect to the terms and conditions of Special Awards; provided,  however, that (i) Special
Awards shall be consistent with the stated purpose of this plan, (ii) Special Awards shall be granted in order
to align the interests of eligible persons with those of the stockholders of Cendant Corporation, and otherwise further the best interests of such stockholders and (iii) neither the granting of
Special Awards nor any term or condition of any Special Award shall be in violation of any other provision of this plan or applicable law. The number of shares of common stock of Cendant Corporation
available for issuance under this plan shall be reduced by the number of shares issued in connection with the exercise or other settlement or cancellation of any Special Award. 









QuickLinks


AMENDMENT TO CERTAIN STOCK PLANS
# L_2005240EN.01003601.xml

| 16.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 240/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 240/36

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1495/2005

of 15 September 2005

amending Regulation (EC) No 1166/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of maize held by the French intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1166/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of 53 641 tonnes of maize held by the French intervention agency. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1166/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of 53 641 tonnes of maize held by the French intervention agency.

| (2) | Given the current market situation, the quantities of maize put up for sale by the French intervention agency on the internal market should be increased, taking the permanent invitation to tender to 64 424 tonnes. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Given the current market situation, the quantities of maize put up for sale by the French intervention agency on the internal market should be increased, taking the permanent invitation to tender to 64 424 tonnes.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 1166/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 1166/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1166/2005 is hereby amended as follows:

| 1. | In Article 1, ‘53 641 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘64 424 tonnes’, |
| --- | --- |

1.

In Article 1, ‘53 641 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘64 424 tonnes’,

| 2. | In the title of the Annex, ‘53 641 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘64 424 tonnes’. |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the title of the Annex, ‘53 641 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘64 424 tonnes’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 188, 20.7.2005, p. 10.

2

---
[Cite as State ex rel. Untied v. Ellwood, 131 Ohio St.3d 37, 2011-Ohio-6343.] 

THE STATE EX REL. UNTIED, APPELLANT, v. ELLWOOD,

JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES. 

[Cite as State ex rel. Untied v. Ellwood, 131 Ohio St.3d 37, 2011-Ohio-6343.] 

Criminal law—Hearing on alleged violation of community control held after 

expiration of term of community control—Writ of prohibition denied—

Clerks of court—Date-stamping of filed documents sufficient; timestamping not required. 

(No. 2011-1188—Submitted December 7, 2011—Decided December 14, 2011.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Guernsey County, No. 11 CA 07, 

2011-Ohio-2836. 

__________________ 

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the 

complaint of appellant, David M. Untied, for extraordinary relief in prohibition 

and mandamus. 

{¶ 2} Untied is not entitled to a writ of prohibition to prevent appellee 

Judge David A. Ellwood of the Guernsey County Court of Common Pleas from 

proceeding with a hearing on an alleged violation of community control. Judge 

Ellwood stayed the hearing pending the ruling by the chief justice of this court on 

Untied’s affidavit of disqualification against him. See, e.g., State ex rel. Denton 

v. Bedinghaus, 98 Ohio St.3d 298, 2003-Ohio-861, 784 N.E.2d 99, ¶ 26 

(prohibition claim moot to the extent that appellants sought to prevent a policy 

that had already been discontinued). And Judge Ellwood “was authorized to 

conduct proceedings on the alleged community-control violations even though 

they were conducted after the expiration of the term of community control, 

provided that the notice of violations was properly given and the revocation 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

proceedings were commenced before the expiration.” State ex rel. Hemsley v. 

Burnham Unruh, 128 Ohio St.3d 307, 2011-Ohio-226, 943 N.E.2d 1014, ¶ 13. 

The charge against Untied for violating community control was filed on February 

16, 2011, i.e., before his community control expired. 

{¶ 3} Moreover, Untied is not entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel 

appellee Guernsey County Common Pleas Clerk of Court Teresa Dankovic to 

date-stamp and time-stamp all documents filed with the court. The applicable 

entries were all stamped with the date of filing. This is all that the pertinent 

provisions require. R.C. 2303.10 (“The clerk of the court of common pleas shall 

indorse upon every paper filed with him the date of the filing thereof * * *”); 

Sup.R. 44(E) (“ ‘File’ means to deposit a document with a clerk of court, upon the 

occurrence of which the clerk time or date stamps and dockets the document” 

[emphasis added]). 

{¶ 4} Based on the foregoing, the court of appeals correctly held that 

Untied was not entitled to the requested extraordinary relief in prohibition and 

mandamus, and we affirm that judgment. 

Judgment affirmed. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,

LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 David M. Untied, pro se. 

 Daniel G. Padden, Guernsey County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees. 

______________________
#### RICHARD JACOBS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., a Florida corporation, and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, a foreign corporation, Appellants, v. BANNER ELECTRIC, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1222.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 21, 1973.

Interlocutory appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George W. Ledder, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Philip MONTELEPRE et al. v. Edwin W. EDWARDS et al.

No. 62419.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: Philip Montelepre, et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans.

Denied.