alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1



Exhibit 10.1




January 5, 2018




Michael Feinsod

Infinity Capital, LLC

200 South Service Road

Roslyn, NY 11576




Re:

Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Senior Secured Note




Dear Michael:





Reference is hereby made to the Second Amended and Restated Senior Secured Note (the “Note”) dated as of December 31, 2016 by and between General Cannabis Corp., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), and Infinity Capital, LLC (“Infinity Capital”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Note.




The Note provides in Section 1 that all interest accruing on the Note shall be paid in cash in arrears on the Maturity Date.  The Note additionally provides in Section 2(c) that the Company shall use 100% of the proceeds from any capital raise exceeding $750,000 to pay any outstanding principal and interest due under the Note, subject to subordination to the Company’s 12% Note.




The Company and Infinity Capital hereby confirm and agree as follows: (i) Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended such that (x) the Company shall pay Infinity Capital on the date hereof the outstanding accrued interest on the Note as of December 31, 2017, in the amount of $68,506, and (y) beginning effective February 15, 2018, the Company will pay Infinity Capital on the 15th calendar day of each month (or the next business day thereafter if such 15th calendar day falls on a weekend or federal holiday) the interest that accrued on the Note during the immediately preceding month; and (ii) Section 2(c) of the Note is no longer applicable. 




Except as expressly modified hereby, all terms, conditions and provisions of the Note shall continue in full force and effect.  In the event of any inconsistency or conflict between the Note and this letter agreement, the terms, conditions and provisions of this letter agreement shall govern and control.  This letter agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York, and may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




Please countersign this letter below to confirm that Infinity Capital has approved of the foregoing amendment to the Note as of the date first above written.




Very truly yours,




GENERAL CANNABIS CORP.




By: 

Name:

Title:




Agreed and accepted:




INFINITY CAPITAL, LLC




By: 

Name:

Title:
#### Bessie M. COXEY, Appellant, v. Lawrence RUBEN and Jacob Morrow d/b/a Rochelle Realty Co., a limited New York partnership, qualified to transact business in the State of Florida, and First National Bank of Hollywood et al., Appellees.

No. 69-101.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 16, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George W. Tedder, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Supplement to the  currently  effective  Statements  of  Additional  Information
("SAIs") for the below-listed funds.


DWS Capital Growth Fund
DWS Core Fixed Income Fund
DWS Dreman High Return Equity Fund
DWS Global Thematic Fund
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Fund



The following  disclosure  replaces  similar  disclosure in the section entitled
"Purchase  of  Institutional  Class and Class R Shares" or  "Purchase of Class R
Shares"  under  "Purchase  and  Redemption of Shares -- Purchases" in the funds'
currently effective SAIs:

Purchase  of Class R  Shares.  Information  on how to buy  Class R shares is set
forth in the  section  entitled  "How to Buy and  Sell  Class R  Shares"  in the
Fund's  Prospectus.  There  are no  minimum  investments  for  Class  R  shares.
However,  minimum  investments  may be established  at any time in  management's
discretion.   Class  R  shares  are  subject  to  an  annual   distribution  and
shareholder   servicing  fee  of  0.50%  (0.25%   distribution   fee  and  0.25%
shareholder service fee).














              Please retain this supplement for future reference.





August 20, 2008
#### Johnnie David RANDOLPH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-968.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 19, 1974.

Pollack, Yocom, Tunkey, Robbins & Mosca, Alvin E. Entin and Lewis S. Kim-ler, Miami, for appellant.

*70Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Linda C. Hertz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant was indicted for murder in the first degree, tried by jury, found guilty of aggravated assault, and sentenced to five years in the state penitentiary.

On appeal, defendant-appellant raises the question as to whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.

At the trial, the defendant testified that the killing was done by him in self defense. There were no witnesses to this event other than the defendant and the victim, and appellant contends there were no facts or circumstances disclosed in the evidence which could be said to contradict or refute his version of the incident. Citing Holton v. State, 87 Fla. 65, 99 So. 244 (1924) and Alexander v. State, Fla.App. 1973, 284 So.2d 478 as authority therefor, defendant-appellant contends his motion for directed verdict of acquittal should have been granted.

The above cases are not controlling here because an examination of the record discloses there was evidence from statements of the defendant made to one of the witnesses immediately after the killing and his statements at the trial which the jury obviously considered sufficient to refute the defendant’s version of the incident. In addition, the knife with which the victim allegedly attacked the defendant was never found nor positively seen lying next to the victim’s body by any of the witnesses. Cf. Arnold v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 241 So.2d 192. There being substantial competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury which properly considered the issue of self-defense,1 the judgment will not be disturbed.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed herein is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. Payton v. State, Fla.App., 1967, 260 So.2d 256.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 56195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Meeting: Board of Scientific Counselors

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of 
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, at 8 a.m. on December 8-10, 1997, 
National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Rooms 433 and 413, 9000 
Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(6), 
Title 5, U.S.C. and Section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the entire 
meeting will be closed to the public for the review, discussion, and 
evaluation of individual programs and projects by the National 
Institutes of Health, including consideration of personal 
qualifications and performing, the competence of individual 
investigators, and similar items, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Dr. Thomas J. Kindt, Executive Secretary, Board of Scientific 
Counselors, NIAID, NIH, Building 10, Room 4A31, telephone 301-496-3006, 
will provide substantive program information.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93-301, National 
Institutes of Health)

    Dated: October 21, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-28626 Filed 10-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this annualreport of ML BlueTrend FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Justin C. Ferri, ChiefExecutive Officer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch AlternativeInvestments, LLC the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date: March 31,  2010                      |                |
|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
|                                            |                |
| By                                              | /s/ JUSTIN C. FERRI |   |
| Justin C. Ferri                                 |                |
| Chief Executive  Officer, President and Manager |                |
| **(Principal Executive Officer)**               | ** **          |
|                                                 |                     |  |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000907072
<NAME> CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,965
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,836)
<INVENTORY>                                     24,118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,847
<PP&E>                                          28,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,202)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,364
<BONDS>                                         61,070
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,276
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,864
<SALES>                                        168,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,442
<CGS>                                          114,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  116,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,401
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,949
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (4,617)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,668)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.14



Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement
(the Agreement) executed June 9th, 2002 by and among House & Garden, a corporation of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan D/B/A Century Knits (CK), Prosperity Textiles Ltd., a corporation of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
(PTL), Cygne Designs, Inc., a Delware Company (Cygne), and Century investment Group, a Public Shareholding Company of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (CIG)



The parties hereto hereby agreed that in final settlement for
payments due PTL under sections 1.3, 1.5 and 1.6 of the Agreement together with purchase of fixed assets and transfer of Srilanken employees subsequently agreed upon, CK shall pay the sum of US$ 433,000 to Cygne on or before April 30, 2003 together
with interest computed on the basis of 8% per annum from June 19, 2002.



The settlement amount provided hereabove includes the undertaking by CK to pay on behalf of PTL the sum of US$ 230,000 to UTG, any amounts payable to former PTL suppliers, and any amounts owed by PTL to Egyptian Arab Land
Bank.



CKs obligations under this Amendment
are guaranteed by CIG, and CIG shall indemnify PTL against subsequent claims by said PTL suppliers.



The undersigned have duly executed of this Amendment on July 29th, 2002.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|House & Garden Company D/B/A Century Knits
|                                          
|By:                                       
|                                          
|Century Investment Group                  
|                                          
|By:                                       
|                                          
|Cygne Designs, Inc.                       
|By:                                       
|                                          
|Prosperity Textiles, Ltd.                 
|                                          
|By:                                       
|
Exhibit 31.2.1

Certification

I, Robert M. Pollichino, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Madison Square Garden, Inc.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------
|Date:  April 1, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert M. Pollichino    
|                     |  |  |  | Robert M. Pollichino        
|                     |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Hondo Minerals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William R. Miertschin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

















/s/William R. Miertschin


By: William R. Miertschin


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





Dated: November 3, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1








EX-32   ·   Section 1350 Certifications


QUANTUM ASSETS INC.





Pursuant to Section  18U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant  to  section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002 (subsection  (a) and (b) of  section  1350,  chapter 63 of title 18, United  States  Code),  each of the  undersigned  officers  of Quantum Assets Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:





The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2010  (the  "Form  10-K")  of  the  Company   fully   complies   with  the requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and  information  contained  in the  Form  10-K  fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  June 20, 2011
By:
/s/  Steve CurlingSteve Curling

Principal Executive Officer/s/ Pamela McClanahanPamela McClanahan

Principal Financial Officer
#### William S. BLALOCK and Virginia O. Blalock, his wife, Donald K. Hanson and Maxine F. Hanson, his wife, and A. B. Williams, Jr., and Janie Williams, his wife, Appellants, v. Don W. SISSON and Mariel R. Sisson, his wife, Appellees.

No. 70-724.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 2, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; John J. Crews, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.20 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EXTRADITION 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SLOVENIA Amending the 

Treaty with the Kingdom of Serbia 

of October 25, 1901 

 

Signed at Ljubljana October 17, 2005 

 with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 SLOVENIA 

 Extradition 

Agreement amending the treaty with the 

 Kingdom of Serbia of October 25, 1901. 

Signed at Ljubljana October 17, 2005; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-14, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-12, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Instruments of Ratification 

 at Washington July 29, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010. 

With annex.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10365 Conference Calendar

NORMAN CHARLES OLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WAYNE SCOTT; ET AL, Defendants, WAYNE SCOTT; GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Defendants-Appellants, and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CV-2246-H

-------------------- October 18, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) has appealed an interlocutory order issued by the district court prohibitingNo. 00-10365 -2- TDCJ officials from monitoring the telephone conversations of Norman Charles Oliver, Texas prisoner # 576427, with his attorneys concerning settlements negotiations with Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), Management & Training Corporation (MTC), and Warden Wilson until the final disposition of the instant case. The district court dismissed Oliver’s claims against Wayne Scott and Gary Johnson. Oliver has settled his claims against MTC and Warden Wilson, and the district court has entered a final judgment dismissing Oliver’s remaining claims against CCA. Because a final judgment has been entered in the instant case and the interlocutory order which is the subject of this appeal is no longer in effect, the instant appeal does not present a live controversy and is DISMISSED as moot. See Rocky v. King , 900 F.2d 864, 867 (5th Cir. 1990). APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Mint Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry Hollander, Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Dated:  November 10, 2010
Mint Capital, Inc.By: /s/ Barry HollanderBarry Hollander

President

(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         464,311
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                    53,687
<INVENTORY>                                    208,442
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               968,197
<PP&E>                                          30,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,904,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          848,545
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,626,430
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,070,729)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,904,546
<SALES>                                      1,751,219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,751,219
<CGS>                                          719,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  719,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               875,490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                252,983
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            252,983
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   252,983
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
#### Gladys Bowen MEASE, Appellant, v. WARM MINERAL SPRINGS, INC., Appellee.

No. 69-664.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 8, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 17, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.