Appendix A: Planned Transportation Projects Adjacent 

to the Presidio
Project Agency Location Status Relevancy to LoTIS

Central Richmond Traffic Safety SFMTA Southern edge of the Presidio Construction

Improvements to pedestrian and bicycle 

safety and access for those traveling to and 

from the Central Richmond

Lombard Street Vision Zero

SFMTA, SFDPW, 

SFPUC Lombard St east of the Presidio Construction

Improvements to pedestrian safety and 

transit efficiency along nearby corridor also 

used by PresidiGo

Geary Rapid Project/Geary 

Boulevard Improvement Project SFMTA

Geary Boulevard south of the 

Presidio

Construction/Short-range 

planning

Improvements to Muni rapid service along a 

key east-west corridor near the Presidio

Park Presidio Lombard Temporary 

HOV Lanes SFMTA

Park Presidio Blvd south of the 

Presidio AND Lombard St east of 

the Presidio Current

Temporary improvements to Muni and 

Golden Gate Transit services that serve the 

Presidio

8th Avenue Neighborway SFMTA 8th Ave south of the Presidio Current

Improvements to pedestrian and bicycle 

safety and access for those traveling to and 

from the Inner Richmond

Marina Bay Trail Planning

Rec/Park, 

SFPUC, SFMTA Eastern edge of the Presidio Current

Improvements to pedestrian and bicycle 

safety and access along the San Francisco 

Bay Trail

28 19th Ave Rapid Project SFMTA, SFPUC 19th Avenue south of the Presidio Current

Improvements to Muni rapid service along a 

key north-south corridor that serves the 

Presidio

29 Sunset Improvement Project SFMTA

29 Sunset corridor south of the 

Presidio Short-range planning

Improvements to Muni service along a route 

that serves the Presidio

Central Subway Extension SFMTA East of the Presidio Long-range planning

Potential for Central Subway to extend to the 

Presidio, providing Muni Metro service to 

the area
Appendix B: Presidio Population Demographics
Source: 2018 American Community Survey, US Census Bureau

 

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

Average Household Size

Average Household Size

Presidio Adjacent Neighborhoods

SF Communities of Concern

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

% Married Couple Family Households % Non-Family Households

Household Types

Presidio Adjacent Neighborhoods

SF Communities of Concern
Source: 2018 American Community Survey, US Census Bureau

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% With Children % With Older Individuals % Renting % Percent Below the Poverty Level

Household Demographics

Presidio Adjacent Neighborhoods SF Communities of Concern
Source: 2018 American Community Survey, US Census Bureau

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% White % Black % Asian % Other % Hispanic*

Race/Ethnicity Demographics

Presidio Adjacent Neighborhoods SF Communities of Concern
Source: 2018 American Community Survey, US Census Bureau

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

% Using Public Transit % Biking % Walking % Working From Home

Commuting

Presidio Adjacent Neighborhoods SF Communities of Concern
Source: 2018 American Community Survey, US Census Bureau

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

% Of Households With No Vehicles % Of Households With 3+ Vehicles

Vehicle Ownership

Presidio Adjacent Neighborhoods SF Communities of Concern
Appendix C: Walkshed and Bikeshed Maps
Presidio Activity Center Walksheds
Baker Beach Bikeshed (Traveling Away)
Baker Beach Bikeshed (Traveling Toward)
Fort Scott Bikeshed (Traveling Away)
Fort Scott Bikeshed (Traveling Toward)
Golden Gate Bridge Visitor Center Bikeshed (Traveling Away)
Golden Gate Bridge Visitor Center Bikeshed (Traveling Toward)
Inspiration Point Bikeshed (Traveling Away)
Inspiration Point Bikeshed (Traveling Toward)
Public Health District Bikeshed (Traveling Away)
Public Health District Bikeshed (Traveling Toward)
Letterman District Bikeshed (Traveling Away)
Letterman District Bikeshed (Traveling Toward)
West Crissy Bikeshed (Traveling Away)
West Crissy Bikeshed (Traveling Toward)
Presidio Transit Center Bikeshed (Traveling Away)
Presidio Transit Center Bikeshed (Traveling Toward)
Appendix D: Needs Assessment Scoring Criteria 

and Scores
Bicycle Project Selection Criteria

Location along the 

primary bike network 0 = No, 1 = Yes

Constitutes a significant gap for 

cyclists based on bikeshed analysis 0 = No, 1 = Yes

Location with a high bicycle

Level of Traffic Stress 0 = LTS <3, 1 = LTS of 3, 2 = LTS of 4

Location with high 

existing bicycle demand 

0 = Low demand, 1 = <200 at peak hour, 2 = >200 at peak 

hour

Location with recorded 

bicycle injuries 

0 = No, 1 = one minor injury, 2 = multiple minor injuries or one 

serious injury

Improves connection to 

the regional bike network 0 = No, 1 = Yes
# AKA Project Extent

Primary Bike 

Network

Bikeshed 

Gap Bike LTS

Bike 

Demand Injuries

Regional 

Network Total

B1

New Class II Bike Lane and 

bike-scale lighting

Halleck between Lincoln and 

French Ct 1 1 1 1 0 1 5

B2 New Class II Bike Lane and Lincoln between GGB Plaza and 1 1 2 1 0 1 6

B3

Class II Bike Lane (SB) and 

bike-scale lighting

Lincoln between Torney and 

Letterman 1 1 1 1 1 0 5

B4 V4

New Class II Bike Lane and 

bike-scale lighting

Presidio between Letterman and 

Lombard 1 0 1 1 1 0 4

B5 New Class II Bike Lane

Sheridan between Lincoln and 

Arguello 0 0 1 1 0 0 2

B7 New Class III Bike Route

Sheridan between Arguello and 

Graham 0 0 1 1 0 0 2

B8A V2

New Class IV Bike Lane and 

bike-scale lighting

Lincoln between Montgomery 

and Girard 1 0 0 2 0 0 3

B8B

New Class IV Bike Lane and 

bike-scale lighting

Lincoln between Girard and 

Torney 1 1 2 1 0 0 5

B9

New Class IV Bike Lane and 

bike-scale lighting

Lincoln between Bowley and 

Bowley 1 0 0 1 2 1 5

B10

New Mixed Class II/III Bike 

Lane and bike-scale lighting

Arguello between Washington 

and Moraga 1 1 1 1 1 0 5

B11

New Mixed Class II/III Bike 

Lane and bike-scale lighting

Lincoln between Pershing and 

Kobbe 1 1 1 1 0 0 4

B12

New Mixed Class II/III Bike 

Lane and bike-scale lighting

Lincoln between Storey and 

Patten 0 1 1 1 0 0 3

B13

New Mixed Class II/III Bike 

Lane and bike-scale lighting

Presidio between Lombard and 

Pacific 1 1 1 0 1 1 5

B14

New Mixed Class II/III Bike 

Lane and bike-scale lighting

Lincoln between Merchant and 

GGB Plaza 1 1 1 0 1 1 5

B15

New Mixed Class II/III Bike 

Lane and bike-scale lighting

McDowell between Lincoln and 

Cowles 1 1 1 1 0 0 4

B16

Trial Advisory Bike Lane and 

bike-scale lighting

Graham between Moraga and 

Lincoln 1 0 1 0 1 0 3

B17 V5

Improved Striping/Marking, 

Class III

Gorgas between Girard and 

Richardson 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
# AKA Project Extent

Primary Bike 

Network

Bikeshed 

Gap Bike LTS

Bike 

Demand Injuries

Regional 

Network Total

B18

Improved Striping/Marking, 

Class II and bike-scale 

Lincoln between El Camino del 

Mar and Bowley 1 0 0 0 0 1 2

B19

Improve drainage and bikescale lighting Crissy Field Ave 1 0 0 2 0 1 4

B20 P12/V20

Protected Intersection and 

bike-scale lighting Mason at E Beach Driveways 1 0 0 2 2 1 6

B21 P13 Improved bike/ped facilities

Battery Caulfield Connector 

Road between Bld 1599 Parking 

and Battery Caulfield Rd 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

B22

Advisory Bike 

Lane/Improving Striping 

and bike-scale lighting

Washington between Lincoln 

and Deems 1 0 0 2 1 0 4

B23 Advisory Bike Lane

Montgomery between Lincoln 

and Moraga 0 0 1 1 0 0 2

B24A

Improved Striping and bikescale lightingPark between Washington and 

Amatury Loop 1 1 1 1 1 0 5

B24B

Improved Striping and bikescale lightingPark between Amatury Loop and 

McDowell 1 0 0 1 1 0 3

B25

New Contraflow Class II 

Bike Lane

Bowley between Lincoln and 

Pershing 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

B26 V11 New Class II Bike Lane

Presidio between Mesa and 

Lincoln 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

B27 V6 New Class III Bike Route

W Pacific between Mountain 

Lake Trail and Presidio 0 0 1 0 1 1 3

B28 P79

New Bike Path and bikescale lightingMcDowell between Park and 

Mason 1 1 1 1 1 1 6

B29 P77

Harden curves to protect 

bike lanes and bike-scale 

lighting

Arguello between Park gate and 

Washington 1 0 0 2 1 1 5

B30

Improve trail pinch point 

and bike-scale lighting

Presidio Promenade Trail 

between Bldg 558 (Letterman 

PO) and 1 0 0 1 0 0 2
# AKA Project Extent

Primary Bike 

Network

Bikeshed 

Gap Bike LTS

Bike 

Demand Injuries

Regional 

Network Total

B31

Remove bike lane weave 

and add bike signal and 

bike-scale lighting Girard at US 101 NB Ramps 1 0 0 0 0 1 2

B32

Improve path connection 

and bike-scale lighting

Area between Fort Scott and 

GGB 1 0 0 2 2 1 6

B33 P78

Improve bicycle 

accomodations and bikescale lightingPark Trail between Washington 

and Lincoln 1 0 0 1 1 0 3

B34

New Class IV Bike Lane and 

bike-scale lighting Mason 1 0 0 2 2 1 6

B35 P14/V3

Make intersection miniroundabout and bike-scale 

lighting Lincoln at Girard 1 0 2 1 0 0 4

B36 V7

Prioritize buses, bikes and 

local access and bike-scale 

lighting

Letterman between Lincoln and 

Lombard 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

B37 P15/V8

Intersection improvements 

and lane reductions and 

bike-scale lighting

Lincoln between Letterman and 

Graham 1 1 1 1 1 0 5

B38 P58

Southeast bike/ped 

network connector and 

bike-scale lighting

Presidio between Lombard and 

Pacific 1 1 1 0 0 1 4

B39 P20

Bay trail improvements and 

formalization and bikescale lighting Crissy Field Ave at Mason 1 0 0 2 2 1 6

B40 P29

Greenwich Gate & Presidio 

Promenade and bike-scale 

lighting

Area between Greenwich and 

Letterman 1 0 0 1 2 1 5

B41 P28/V13

Single access point to 

driveways and bike-scale 

lighting Mason at E Beach Driveways 1 0 0 2 2 1 6
# AKA Project Extent

Primary Bike 

Network

Bikeshed 

Gap Bike LTS

Bike 

Demand Injuries

Regional 

Network Total

B42 P26

Bay trail improvements, 

Mason St crosswalks, and 

southern sidewalk 

enhancements. and bikescale lightingMason Street between Marina 

Gate and Long Avenue/Area A 1 0 0 2 2 1 6

B43 P30/V21

Protected Intersection and 

bike-scale lighting Lincoln at Bowley / Pershing 1 0 1 1 2 0 5

B44 P31

Intersection and visibility 

improvements and bikescale lighting Lincoln at Merchant / Storey 1 0 1 2 2 1 7

B45

New Class III Bike Route 

and traffic calming

Moraga / Funston between 

Infantry Terrace and Presidio or 

Lincoln 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

B46 V29

New Class IV Bike Lane and 

bike-scale lighting

Girard between Lincoln and 

Marina 1 0 2 0 0 1 4

B47

Expand bike rack 

distribution Parkwide 0

B48

Intersection improvements 

and bike-scale lighting Washington at Kobbe 1 0 0 1 2 0 4

B49

Corridor safety 

improvements and bikescale lightingLombard between Letterman 

and Lyon 1 0 0 1 2 1 5

B50

Corridor bikeway 

improvements and bikescale lightingRalston / Greenough between 

Lincoln and Kobbe 1 0 0 1 0 1 3

B51

Improve bicycle 

accomodations and 

gateways and bike-scale 

lighting

Park Trail between 15th Ave 

Gate and Washington 1 0 0 0 0 1 2

B52

Improve bicycle 

accomodations and bikescale lightingKobbe Ave between Lincoln and 

Greenough 1 0 0 1 0 0 2
# AKA Project Extent

Primary Bike 

Network

Bikeshed 

Gap Bike LTS

Bike 

Demand Injuries

Regional 

Network Total

B53 P59 Ped/bike-scale lighting

Battery E Trail between GGB and 

Long Ave 1 0 0 1 0 1 3

B54

Improve bicycle 

accomodations and bikescale lightingStorey/Ruckman between 

Lincoln and Lincoln 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

B55 P40

Improve connection 

between Ruckman and 

Patten and bike-scale 

lighting

Lincoln between Ruckman and 

Patten 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

B56

Improve Patten and Lincoln 

merge (east end) Lincoln at Patten 1 0 1 1 0 0 3

B57 P60

Improve 

Marina/Mason/Girard 

intersection

Mason between Girard and 

Marina 1 0 2 1 0 1 5

B58 P61

Improve connection 

between Arguello and 

Graham and bike-scale 

lighting

Moraga between Arguello and 

Graham 1 0 1 1 1 0 4

B60 P6

Improve intersection and 

ped-scale lighting Washington at Arguello 1 1 1 1 0 0 4

B61

Improve bicycle 

accomodations and bikescale lightingLincoln between Long and 

Patten 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

B62 P66

Close roadway to vehicular 

traffic and ped/bike-scale 

lighting

Harrison between Washington 

and Hitchcock 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

B63 P68 Ped/bike-scale lighting

Patten between Lincoln and 

Lincoln 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

B64 P72

Improve connection 

between Lincoln and 

Presidio Promenade Trail

Lincoln between Montgomery 

and Presidio Promenade Trail 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

B65

Convert into a bidirectional bike facilityBattery Wagner between 

Ruckman and Upton 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
# AKA Project Extent

Primary Bike 

Network

Bikeshed 

Gap Bike LTS

Bike 

Demand Injuries

Regional 

Network Total

B66

Gateway improvements, 

orientation, amenities and 

bike-scale lighting 15th Ave Gate 1 0 0 1 0 1 3

B67 P64

Improve ped facilities and 

ped/bike-scale lighting

Battery Caulfield between 15th 

Ave gate and Washington 1 0 0 1 0 1 3

B68

Consider ped/bike-scale 

lighting

Graham between Moraga and 

Lincoln 1 0 1 0 1 0 3

B69

Improve intersection; 

consider bike-scale lighting Lincoln at Battery East 1 0 2 1 0 1 5

B70

Class IV Bike Lane (followup)Lincoln between El Camino del 

Mar and Bowley 1 0 0 1 0 1 3

B71

Class I or IV Bike route 

(follow-up)

Lincoln between Bowley and 

Kobbe 1 1 1 1 2 0 6

B72

Class II Bike Lane (downhill) 

(follow-up)

Lincoln between Storey and GGB 

Plaza 1 1 1 0 2 1 6

B73

Class II Bike Lane (downhill) 

(follow-up)

Arguello between Washington 

and Moraga 1 1 1 1 1 0 5

B74

Buffer bike lanes and 

improve striping

Arguello between Park gate and 

Washington 1 0 0 2 1 1 5

B75 P84

Class I Bike Path/Multi-use 

trail

Area between Sheridan and 

Incinerator 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

B76

Improve bike connection 

(perhaps along Rod)

Storey between Lincoln and 

Battery Wagner 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

B77

Class II Bike Lane (work w/ 

MTA)

15th Ave between Wedemeyer 

and Lake 1 0 0 1 0 1 3

B78

Improve connection 

between Class I bike path 

and Class II bike lane Lincoln at Sheridan 1 0 0 1 0 0 2
Pedestrian Project Selection Criteria

Location along the primary 

pedestrian network 0 = No, 1 = Yes

Identified by the Trust as a 

pedestrian gap with insufficient 

facilities 

0 = No, 1 = Yes

Constitutes a significant gap for 

pedestrians based on 

walkshed analysis 

0 = No, 1 = Yes

Constitutes a significant gap for 

pedestrians trying to access 

transit services 

0 = No, 1 = Yes

Location with high existing 

pedestrian volumes 

0 = Low demand, 1 = <200 at peak hour, 2 = >200 at peak 

hour

Location with recorded

pedestrian injuries 

0 = No, 1 = one minor injury, 2 = multiple minor injuries or one 

serious injury
# AKA Project Extent

Primary Ped 

Network

Pedestrian 

Gap

Walkshed 

Gap

Transit 

Access Gap

Pedestrian 

Demand Injuries Total

P1 Close pedestrian gap Mason (S Side) at Sports Basement 0 1 1 1 2 0 5

P2

Close pedestrian gap and 

ped-scale lighting Gorgas between Girard and O'Reilly 1 1 0 1 0 0 3

P3 Close pedestrian gap

Arguello (W side) between 

Sheridan and Moraga 0 1 0 1 1 0 3

P4

Close trail gap and ped-scale 

lighting

Lincoln between Pershing and 

Coastal Trail 1 1 1 0 0 0 3

P5

Close pedestrian gap and 

ped-scale lighting

Washington (S side) between 

Nauman and Arguello 1 1 1 1 0 0 4

P6 B60

Improve intersection and 

ped-scale lighting Washington at Arguello 1 1 1 0 1 0 4

P7

Improve trail road crossing 

and ped-scale lighting

Bay Area Ridge Trail between 

Arguello and 1 0 0 0 1 2 4

P8

Traffic calming / school zone 

and ped-scale lighting

Funston between Moraga and 

Lincoln 1 0 0 1 1 2 5

P9 V14

Improve trail road crossing 

by narrowing roadway and 

ped-scale lighting Lovers Lane (N end) at Presidio 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P10

Trail enhancements and pedscale lightingPark Trail between Mountain Lake 

Trail and Washington 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P11

Accessible trail connection 

and ped-scale lighting

Gibson between Bowley and Baker 

Beach 1 1 1 1 1 0 5

P12 B20/V20

Protected Intersection and 

ped-scale lighting

Mason between E Beach Driveways 

and 1 0 0 1 2 0 4

P13 B21

Trail upgrade and ped-scale 

lighting

Battery Caulfield Connector Road 

between Bld 1599 Parking and 

Battery Caulfield Rd 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

P14 B35/V3

Make intersection miniroundabout and ped-scale 

lighting Lincoln at Girard 1 0 0 1 1 2 5
# AKA Project Extent

Primary Ped 

Network

Pedestrian 

Gap

Walkshed 

Gap

Transit 

Access Gap

Pedestrian 

Demand Injuries Total

P15 B37/V8

Intersection improvements 

and lane reductions and pedscale lightingLincoln between Letterman and 

Graham 1 0 0 1 1 1 4

P16

Gateway improvements, 

orientation, amenities and 

ped-scale lighting Presidio Gate 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P17

Gateway improvements, 

orientation, amenities and 

ped-scale lighting Arguello Gate 1 1 0 0 1 0 3

P18 V9

Gateway improvements, 

orientation, amenities and 

ped-scale lighting 25th Avenue Gate 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P19 V10

Gateway improvements, 

orientation, amenities and 

ped-scale lighting Merchant Road Gate 1 0 0 1 2 0 4

P20 B39

Bay trail improvements and 

formalization and ped-scale 

lighting Crissy Field Ave at Mason 1 0 0 0 2 0 3

P21

Close pedestrian gap and 

ped-scale lighting Kobbe between Lincoln and Upton 1 1 1 1 0 0 4

P22

Close pedestrian gap and 

ped-scale lighting

Storey between Lincoln/Merchant 

and Upton 1 1 1 0 0 0 3

P23

Close pedestrian gap and 

ped-scale lighting

Golf Course Parking lot between 

Arguello and Arguello Gate 1 1 0 0 0 0 2

P24

Gateway improvements, 

orientation, amenities and 

ped-scale lighting Marina Gate 1 0 0 1 2 0 4

P25 Close pedestrian gap

Quarry Road between MacArthur 

and Bldg 810 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

P26 B42

Bay trail improvements, 

Mason St crosswalks, and 

southern sidewalk 

enhancements. and pedscale lightingMason Street between Marina 

Gate and Long Avenue/Area A 1 0 0 1 2 0 4
# AKA Project Extent

Primary Ped 

Network

Pedestrian 

Gap

Walkshed 

Gap

Transit 

Access Gap

Pedestrian 

Demand Injuries Total

P27 V16

Pedestrianize roadway and 

ped-scale lighting

Greenough between Kobbe and 

parking at Ralston 1 1 1 1 0 0 4

P28 B41/V13

Single access point to 

driveways and ped-scale 

lighting Mason at E Beach Driveways 1 0 0 0 2 0 3

P29 B40

Greenwich Gate & Presidio 

Promenade and ped-scale 

lighting

Area between Greenwich and 

Letterman 1 1 0 1 1 0 4

P30 B43/V21

Protected Intersection and 

ped-scale lighting Lincoln at Bowley / Pershing 1 0 0 1 1 2 5

P31 B44

Intersection and visibility 

improvements and ped-scale 

lighting Lincoln at Merchant / Storey 1 1 1 1 2 0 6

P32 Close pedestrian gap

Lincoln between Storey and 

McDowell / Park 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

P33

Gateway improvements, 

orientation, amenities and 

ped-scale lighting

Gorgas gate between Francisco and 

Gorgas 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P34

Widen/improve sidewalk 

and ped-scale lighting

Presidio between Funston and 

Lover's Lane 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P35

Widen Lover's Lane and pedscale lighting Lover's Lane 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P36 Close pedestrian gap Brooks 0 1 0 1 0 0 2

P37 Close pedestrian gap

Compton between Bldg 1413 and 

Washington 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

P38 Close pedestrian gaps Ralston at Ruckman 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

P39

Close pedestrian gap and 

ped-scale lighting

Storey between Ruckman and Bldg 

1289 1 1 1 0 0 0 3

P40 B55

Improve connection 

between Ruckman and 

Patten and ped-scale lighting

Lincoln between Ruckman and 

Patten 1 1 1 0 0 0 3

P41 Close pedestrian gap

GGB Plaza between Lincoln and US 

101 NB 0 1 0 1 0 0 2
# AKA Project Extent

Primary Ped 

Network

Pedestrian 

Gap

Walkshed 

Gap

Transit 

Access Gap

Pedestrian 

Demand Injuries Total

P42 V15

Close roadway to vehicular 

traffic

Barnard between Fernandez and 

end 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

P43 V30

Close roadway to vehicular 

traffic

Barnard between Presidio and 

Fernandez 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

P44 Improve trail

Area between Arguello and Ecology 

Trail 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

P46

Mark crossing and ped-scale 

lighting Arguello at Infantry Terrace 1 1 0 0 1 0 3

P47 V31

Close roadway to vehicular 

traffic

Fernandez between Barnard and 

Bldg 808 parking lot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

P48 Close pedestrian gap

Rodgriguez/Morton/Sanchez 

between Portola and Liggett 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

P49 Close pedestrian gap Area between Sibley and Liggett 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

P50

Close pedestrian gap and 

ped-scale lighting

Bldg 531 parking lot between Ruger 

and Letterman 1 1 0 1 1 0 4

P51

Close pedestrian gap and 

ped-scale lighting

Bldg 63 parking lot between 

Funston and Lincoln 1 1 0 1 1 0 4

P52 Mark crossing Keyes at Canby 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

P53 Close pedestrian gap

38 Keyes parking lot between 

Graham and Keyes 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

P54

Marking lot perimeter ped 

routes and ped-scale lighting Graham/Moraga/Mesa/Keyes 1 1 0 1 2 0 5

P55 Close pedestrian gap

Area between Halleck and Ped 

bridge to Girard 0 1 1 1 0 0 3

P56

Formalize sidewalk and pedscale lightingWashington between Battery 

Caulfield and Park 1 1 1 1 0 0 4

P57 V33

Remove channelized right 

turn Infantry Terrace at Arguello 0 1 0 1 1 0 3

P58 B38

Southeast bike/ped network 

connector

Presidio between Lombard and 

Pacific 1 1 1 0 0 0 3

P59 B53 Ped/bike-scale lighting

Battery E Trail between GGB and 

Long Ave 1 0 0 1 1 0 3
# AKA Project Extent

Primary Ped 

Network

Pedestrian 

Gap

Walkshed 

Gap

Transit 

Access Gap

Pedestrian 

Demand Injuries Total

P60 B57

Improve 

Marina/Mason/Girard 

intersection Mason between Girard and Marina 1 0 0 1 1 1 4

P61 B58

Improve connection 

between Arguello and 

Graham and ped-scale 

lighting

Moraga between Arguello and 

Graham 1 0 0 1 1 0 3

P62 B59 Ped/bike-scale lighting

Halleck between Lincoln and 

Mason 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

P63

Improve ped facilities and 

ped-scale lighting

Bowley between Gibson and 

Pershing 1 1 0 1 1 1 5

P64

Improve ped facilities and 

ped/bike-scale lighting

Battery Caulfield between 15th Ave 

gate and Washington 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

P65

Improve ped facilities and 

ped-scale lighting

Washington between Lincoln and 

Battery Caulfield Rd 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

P66 B62

Close roadway to vehicular 

traffic and ped/bike-scale 

lighting

Harrison between Washington and 

Hitchcock 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

P67

Improve ped facilities and 

ped-scale lighting Kobbe between Upton and Park 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

P68 B63 Ped/bike-scale lighting Patten between Lincoln and Lincoln 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P69

Improve ped facilities and 

ped-scale lighting

Lincoln/Coastal Trail between El 

Camino del Mar and GGB 1 1 1 1 1 1 6

P70

Improve ped facilities and 

ped-scale lighting

Mountain Lake Trail/W Pacific Ave 

between Park Trail and Arguello 1 0 0 0 1 1 3

P71

Improve ped facilities and 

ped-scale lighting

W Pacific between Arguello and 

Lover's Lane 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P72 B64

Improve connection 

between Lincoln and 

Presidio Promenade Trail

Lincoln between Montgomery and 

Presidio Promenade Trail 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P73 V35

Intersection improvements 

and lane reductions Torney at Lincoln 1 0 0 1 1 0 3
# AKA Project Extent

Primary Ped 

Network

Pedestrian 

Gap

Walkshed 

Gap

Transit 

Access Gap

Pedestrian 

Demand Injuries Total

P74

Improve ped wayfinding and 

ped-scale lighting

Torney/O'Reilly between 

Letterman District and Lincoln 1 0 0 1 1 0 3

P75 Ped-scale lighting

Quartermaster Reach Trail 

between Girard and Mason 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

P76 B67

Gateway improvements, 

orientation, amenities and 

ped-scale lighting Chestnut Gate 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P77 B29

Harden curves to protect 

bike lanes and bike-scale 

lighting

Arguello between Park gate and 

Washington 1 0 0 1 1 1 4

P78 B33

Improve bicycle 

accomodations and bikescale lightingPark Trail between Washington and 

Lincoln 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P79 B28

New Bike Path and bike-scale 

lighting

McDowell between Park and 

Mason 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P80

Sidewalk on east side and 

ped-scale lighting

Arguello between Infantry Terrace 

and Moraga 1 0 0 1 1 0 3

P81

Improved ped connection 

and wayfinding Path between Funston and Graham 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P82

Widen sidewalks, improve 

ped facilities; consider pedscale lightingMoraga between Infantry Terrace 

and Funston 1 0 0 0 2 1 4

P83 Tunnel Tops ped connections

Area between French Ct and 

Mason 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

P84 B75

Class I Bike Path/Multi-use 

trail

Area between Sheridan and 

Incinerator 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

P85 Mark crossing to coastal trail Lincoln at Kobbe 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
Vehicle Project Selection Criteria

Location that helps mitigate 

cut-through trips 0 = No, 1 = Yes

Location with high existing 

vehicle volumes at peak hour 0 = <100, 1 = >100, 2 = >500

Location with high 

observed vehicle speeds 0 = No (or unable to determine), 1 = Yes

Location with recorded

vehicle injuries 

0 = No, 1 = one minor injury, 2 = multiple minor injuries or one 

serious injury
# AKA Project Extent

Cut-Through 

Mitigation Vehicle Demand High Vehicle Speeds Injuries Total

V1

Restrict L turns to reduce 

cut-through Lincoln at GGB Plaza/US 101 N 1 2 0 0 3

V2 B8A

Remove center turn lane to 

make way for bike lanes

Lincoln between Montgomery 

and Girard 0 1 0 1 2

V3 B35/P14

Make intersection miniroundabout Lincoln at Girard 0 1 0 0 1

V4 B4

Remove lane to make way 

for bike lanes

Presidio between Letterman and 

Lombard 0 2 0 0 2

V5 B17 Stripe as bike boulevard

Gorgas between Girard and 

Richardson 0 2 0 1 3

V6 B27

Study for various degrees 

of closure

W Pacific between Arguello and 

Presidio 0 0 0 0 0

V7 B36

Prioritize buses, bikes and 

local access

Letterman between Lincoln and 

Lombard 0 1 0 0 1

V8 B37/P15

Intersection improvements 

and lane reductions

Lincoln between Letterman and 

Graham 0 1 0 0 1

V9 P18

Gateway improvements, 

orientation, amenities 25th Avenue Gate 0 2 1 0 3

V10 P19

Gateway improvements, 

orientation, amenities Merchant Road Gate 0 2 0 0 2

V11 B26

Reduce roadway width by 

striping bike lanes

Presidio between Mesa and 

Lincoln 0 1 0 1 2

V12

New traffic circle for safer 

PUDO Mason at W Bluff Parking Lot 0 1 0 0 1

V13 B41/P28

East Beach Driveways/Area 

A Parking Lot Mason between E Beach and 0 1 1 0 2

V14 P9 Curb Extensions/choker

Presidio between Lovers' Lane 

and - 0 0 0 0 0

V15 P42

Close roadway to vehicular 

traffic

Barnard between Fernandez and 

end 0 0 0 0 0

V16 P27

Close roadway to vehicular 

traffic

Greenough between Kobbe and 

parking at Ralston 0 0 0 0 0

V18 Main Post Circulation Main Post 0 0 1 1 2
# AKA Project Extent

Cut-Through 

Mitigation Vehicle Demand High Vehicle Speeds Injuries Total

V19

Letterman/Presidio/Lomba

rd - Eliminate vehicles from 

Letterman

Letterman between Presidio and 

Lombard 0 1 0 0 1

V20 B20/P12 Protected Intersection Mason at E Beach Driveways 0 1 1 0 2

V21 B43/P30 Protected Intersection Lincoln at Bowley / Pershing 0 2 1 2 5

V22 Prohibit turns Presidio at Lombard 1 2 0 0 3

V23 Traffic calming

Presidio between Lombard and 

Pacific 1 2 0 1 4

V24 Wayfinding signage Presidio Gate 1 2 0 0 3

V25 Wayfinding signage Lombard Gate 1 2 0 0 3

V26

Close roadway to private 

traffic

Lincoln between Kobbe and 

Ralston 1 2 0 1 4

V27 Traffic calming

Lincoln between El Camino del 

Mar and Kobbe 1 2 1 2 6

V28

Designation as a slow 

street

Lincoln between El Camino del 

Mar and Merchant 1 2 1 1 5

V29 B46 Traffic calming

Girard between Lincoln and 

Marina 1 2 1 0 4

V30 P43

Close roadway to vehicular 

traffic

Barnard between Presidio and 

Fernandez 0 0 0 0 0

V31 P47

Close roadway to vehicular 

traffic

Fernandez between Barnard and 

Bldg 808 parking lot 0 0 0 0 0

V32 Traffic calming

Lincoln between Long and 

Storey 0 1 0 1 2

V33 P57

Remove channelized right 

turn Infantry Terrace at Arguello 0 0 0 0 0

V34 Remove on-street parking

Graham between Sheridan and 

Lincoln 0 0 1 1 2

V35 P73

Intersection improvements 

and lane reductions Torney at Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0
Appendix E: Pavement Management Program
 

Presidio Trust 

Pavement Management Program Update

Final Report

NCE Project No. 808.15.55 

April 2021

Richmond, CA 

501 Canal Blvd., Suite I 

Richmond, CA 94804 
808.15.55

Presidio Trust

Pavement Management Program Update

Final Report

 April 2021
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

i 

Table of Contents 

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 

Network Description ..................................................................................................................................... 2 

Network Pavement Condition ...................................................................................................................... 3 

Pavement Condition Index ........................................................................................................................ 3 

Pavement Condition Category .................................................................................................................. 5 

Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies ................................................................................................. 6 

Budget Needs ................................................................................................................................................ 7 

Budget Scenarios........................................................................................................................................... 8 

Scenario 1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50% ($35.6 Million/20 years) .......................................... 9 

Scenario 2: Average Annual Budget of $1.7 Million ($33.9 Million/20 years) ........................................ 11 

Scenario 3: Maintain PCI at 70 ($31.5 Million/20 years) ........................................................................ 13 

Scenario 4: Maintain PCI at 66 ($28.9 Million/20 years) ........................................................................ 15 

Scenario Comparisons ............................................................................................................................. 17 

Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 

Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 21 

Appendix A: 

Section Description Inventory – Sorted by Street Name 

Section Description Inventory – Sorted by Descending PCI 

Appendix B: 

Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree 

Appendix C: 

Budget Needs 

Projected PCI/Cost Summary 

Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary 

 Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary 

Appendix D: 

 Budget Scenarios 1 – 4: 

Cost Summary Report 

Network Condition Summary Report 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

ii 

Appendix E: 

PCI Maps 

 Current Network Condition – 2021 

 Scenarios 1 – 4: Projected Network Condition – 2040 

Appendix F: 

Sections Selected for Treatment: Scenario 1 

 

 Appendix G: 

Treatment Maps 

 Sections Selected for Treatment: Scenario 1 – 2021-2025 

 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

iii 

List of Tables 

Table 1: Network Summary Statistics ........................................................................................................... 2 

Table 2: Current Pavement Condition Breakdown by Functional Class ....................................................... 5 

Table 3: Summary Results for Needs Analysis .............................................................................................. 7 

Table 4: Summary Results for Scenario 1 ..................................................................................................... 9 

Table 5: Summary Results for Scenario 2 ................................................................................................... 11 

Table 6: Summary Results for Scenario 3 ................................................................................................... 13 

Table 7: Summary Results for Scenario 4 ................................................................................................... 15 

List of Figures 

Figure 1: Examples of Streets with Different PCIs ........................................................................................ 3 

Figure 2: Street Network Condition Breakdown by Functional Classification .............................................. 4 

Figure 3: Pavement Condition Categories by PCI ......................................................................................... 5 

Figure 4: Costs of Maintaining Pavements over Time .................................................................................. 6 

Figure 5: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1 ............................................................................... 10 

Figure 6: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 2 ............................................................................... 12 

Figure 7: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 3 ............................................................................... 14 

Figure 8: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 4 ............................................................................... 16 

Figure 9: Comparison of Annual Pavement Condition Index by Scenario .................................................. 17 

Figure 10: Comparison of Annual Deferred Maintenance by Scenario ...................................................... 18 

Figure 11: Comparison of Pavement Condition by Scenario ...................................................................... 19 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

iv 

Executive Summary 

This update to the Presidio Trust’s pavement management program (PMP) was completed by Nichols 

Consulting Engineers, Chtd. (NCE) as part of the Long Range Transportation Implementation Strategy 

(LoTIS). This report summarizes the results of the 2020/21 update and its purpose is to help educate policy 

makers about the current condition of the streets and parking lots, and the impact of various funding 

scenarios on the future network condition. 

The Presidio’s pavement network consists of 32.0 centerline miles of streets and trails and 131 parking 

lots, which represents a substantial investment valued at approximately $94 million. In December 2020 

to January 2021, NCE collected pavement condition data using the Metropolitan Transportation 

Commission’s (MTC) survey protocols. Survey data were entered into the StreetSaver® database, which 

the Presidio uses as a pavement management decision-support tool. 

Overall, the Presidio’s pavement network is currently in “Fair” condition with an average pavement 

condition index (PCI) of 661. Approximately 42.1 percent of the network is in “Good” condition and 22.6 

percent is in “Poor” or “Failed” condition. The Presidio is currently in the midst of a large maintenance 

and rehabilitation construction project, which when completed in mid-2021 is expected to increase the 

network PCI to 71. 

The budget needs analysis indicated that the Presidio needs approximately $40.5 million over the next 

twenty years to eliminate the total network deferred maintenance. Since this level of investment may not 

be realistic, four additional budget scenarios were performed to illustrate the impacts of other funding 

levels. For comparison, a do-nothing option was included. The following table lists each scenario with its 

corresponding twenty-year budget, and PCI and deferred maintenance at the end of the analysis period. 

If no maintenance work is performed after the on-going 2021 construction is complete, the network PCI 

will drop to 27 by 2040, and the deferred maintenance will increase to 88 million. In contrast, the four 

scenarios show that regardless of the long-term goal, the average annual cost to maintain the network in 

years 6-20 is the same ($1.7 million per year). This means that the funding commitment in the first five 

years has a significant impact on the long-term condition of the pavement network. 

Scenario 

Budget ($M) Network 

2040 PCI 

2040 Deferred 

Maintenance ($M) Total 

20-Years 

Average 

Years 1-5 

Average 

Years 6-20 

1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance 

by 50% 35.6 2.1 1.7 74 6.8 

2: Average Budget of $1.7M/year 33.9 1.7 1.7 72 9.1 

3: Maintain PCI at 70 31.5 1.2 1.7 70 15.5 

4: Maintain PCI at 66 28.9 0.7 1.7 66 20.3 

Do Nothing 0.0 0.0 0.0 27 88.0 

1

 See the Pavement Condition Category section on page 10 for a detailed discussion of “Good”, “Fair”, “Poor” and “Failed” condition categories.
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

v 

NCE recommends that the Presidio pursue Scenario 1, which will reduce the network deferred 

maintenance by 50 percent in the first five years and then maintain it at the reduced level. This will require 

a total of $35.6 million over 20 years and will result in the network PCI increasing and being maintained 

at 75 (±1 PCI point). The portion of the network in “Good” condition will more than double by 2040. 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

1 

Introduction 

This update to the Presidio Trust’s pavement management program (PMP) was completed by Nichols 

Consulting Engineers, Chtd. (NCE) as part of the Long Range Transportation Implementation Strategy 

(LoTIS). In general, PMPs are “designed to provide objective information and useful data for analysis so 

that... managers can make more consistent, cost effective, and defensible decisions related to the 

preservation of a pavement network.2” 

To update the Presidio’s PMP, NCE performed pavement condition surveys throughout the network using 

the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) survey protocols3. The surveys did not include nonpavement issues such as traffic, safety and road hazards, geometric issues, shoulders, sidewalks, curb and 

gutters, drainage issues, or immediate maintenance needs. All pavement distress data were entered into 

the Presidio’s StreetSaver® database and pavement condition index (PCI) calculations were performed. 

NCE met with Presidio staff and reviewed and updated the maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) 

strategies and treatments. NCE also updated the treatment unit costs based on recent bid tabs from the 

Presidio and other neighboring jurisdictions. 

A budget needs analysis was performed for the network for a twenty-year analysis period at an annual 

inflation rate of 3 percent. This analysis identified M&R recommendations for each pavement section and 

determined the total M&R budget needs for the analysis period. Finally, four budget scenarios were 

analyzed for the network. 

This report answers the following questions: 

 What does the Presidio’s pavement network include? 

 What is the current condition of the pavement network? 

 What are the Presidio’s current M&R strategies? 

 How much funding is required to perform all needed M&R treatment over the next twenty years? 

 What effect will different funding levels have on the network condition and deferred 

maintenance? 

2

 AASHTO “Guidelines for Pavement Management Systems”. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, 

DC, July 1990. 

3

 PCI Distress Identification Manuals (AC 4th Edition, PCC 3td Edition), Metropolitan Transportation Comission, San Francisco, CA, March 2016. 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

2 

Network Description 

The Presidio is responsible for maintaining 32.0 centerline miles of streets and trails as well 131 paved 

parking lots (2.5 million square feet). The pavements are composed primarily of asphalt concrete (AC), 

with a small number of Portland cement concrete (PCC) and composite (asphalt over concrete) pavement. 

The database also includes a few gravel sections; however, the gravel sections are not included in 

subsequent condition summaries or analyses. Table 1 summarizes the network by functional classification 

with the gravel sections shown separately. Note that parking lots and trails are both represented in the 

StreetSaver® database under the Other functional classification. 

Table 1: Network Summary Statistics 

Functional Class No. of 

Sections 

Centerline 

Miles 

Lane 

Miles 

% of the Network 

 (by Pavement Area) 

Arterials 24 6.4 12.8 18.1 

Collectors 44 9.5 18.9 20.3 

Residentials 80 12.0 20.6 22.5 

Other: Parking Lots 131 NA NA 34.9 

Other: Multi-Use Trails 21 4.1 7.9 4.2 

Total 300 32.0 60.2 100 

Gravel 7 0.7 0.7 -

The pavement network replacement cost is estimated to be approximately $94 million. This represents 

the value of the pavement network and is the amount needed to fund a reconstruction of the entire paved 

network. It does not, however, include related infrastructure assets such as curbs, sidewalks, signals, 

markings, signs, or storm drains. 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

3 

Network Pavement Condition 

Pavement Condition Index 

The pavement condition index, or PCI, is a measurement of the pavement condition and ranges from zero 

to 100. A newly constructed street has a PCI of 100, while a failed street has a PCI of 25 or less. A 

pavement’s condition is affected by the environment, traffic loads and volumes, construction materials, 

and age. Figure 1 shows photos of streets with various PCIs. 

 Figure 1: Examples of Streets with Different PCIs 

PCI = 90 PCI = 75

PCI = 35 PCI = 15

PCI = 60
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

4 

The current average PCI for the Presidio’s paved network is 66. This value is an area-weighted calculation 

performed in StreetSaver®. Figure 2 breaks down the current network PCI by functional classification. 

Currently, arterials have the highest condition with an average PCI of 71. Parking lots and trails have 

slightly lower conditions with average PCIs of 67 and 68, respectively. Collectors and residentials have 

average PCIs of 63 and 64, respectively4. 

Figure 2: Street Network Condition Breakdown by Functional Classification 

The Presidio is currently in the midst of a large maintenance and rehabilitation construction project valued 

at approximately $4.9 million. The PCIs presented here represent the pavement condition as of January 

2021 when the condition surveys were completed. Street sections that were actively under construction 

as part of the on-going project were assumed to have no distresses, which corresponds to a PCI value of 

100. When the current construction is completed in mid-2021, the network PCI is expected to increase to 

an average value of 71. 

A list of all sections in the network along with their attributes, including the PCI at the time of last 

inspection, is provided in Appendix A. For convenience, two versions for each list are provided – one 

sorted alphabetically by street name and the other sorted by descending PCI. 

4

 Note that the colors in Figure 2 correspond to the pavement condition categories identified in Figure 3 on page 10. 

Arterials

PCI = 71

Collectors

PCI = 63

Residentials

PCI = 64

Parking 

Lots

PCI = 67

Trails

PCI = 68
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

5 

Pavement Condition Category 

The PCI scale is divided into five condition categories using the PCI breakpoints shown on the right of 

Figure 3. Pavements in “Fair” condition are further divided into two categories separating pavements with 

primarily non-load-related distresses from those with load-related distresses5. Categories I and II have 

primarily non-load-related distresses (e.g. weathering), and Categories III to V have primarily load-related 

distresses (e.g. fatigue cracking). Since the failure mechanisms for load-related distresses are quite 

different from non-load-related distresses, the treatments used to address them are different, as are their 

associated costs. Generally, pavements with load-related distress are more expensive to repair. 

100 

I Good 

70 

II/III Fair 

(non-load) 

Fair 

(load-related)

 

 50 

IV Poor 

 25 

V Failed 

 0 

Condition 

Category Pavement Condition PCI Breakpoint 

Figure 3: Pavement Condition Categories by PCI 

Table 2 summarizes the pavement network by condition category and functional classification. As of 

January 2021, 42.1 percent of the network is in “Good” condition, over a third of the network is in “Fair” 

condition, one fifth is in “Poor” condition, and approximately 3 percent is in “Failed” condition. 

Table 2: Current Pavement Condition Breakdown by Functional Class 

Condition 

Category 

PCI 

Range 

Arterials Collectors Residentials Parking 

Lots Trails Entire 

Network 

% % % % % (%) 

Good (I) 70-100 7.4 7.8 8.6 17.2 1.2 42.1 

Fair (II/III) 50-69 9.7 6.7 8.5 8.1 2.3 35.3 

Poor (IV) 25-49 0.4 5.4 5.0 8.7 0.0 19.5 

Failed (V) <25 0.6 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.8 3.1

Total - 18.1 20.3 22.5 34.9 4.2 100.0 

5The StreetSaver® “Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree” in Appendix B assigns different condition category titles than those provided 

in Figure 3. 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

6 

Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies 

The Presidio’s current maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) strategies include recyclable and costeffective treatments such as cold-in-place recycling and surface seals. In general, crack seal and 

microsurfacing are performed as preventive maintenance when pavements are still in “Good” condition; 

cape seals and hot mix asphalt (HMA) overlays are performed on pavements in “Fair” condition; HMA 

overlays or cold-in-place recycling (CIR) are performed on pavements in “Poor” condition; and 

reconstruction or full-depth reclamation (FDR) are performed to repair pavements that have “Failed”. The 

Presidio’s M&R strategies are formalized into a decision tree (presented in Appendix B), which is 

instrumental in performing the budget needs analysis and budget scenarios and which are discussed in 

the following sections. 

Experience and research have shown that it costs much less to maintain pavements in good condition 

than to repair pavements that have already failed. As shown in Figure 4, by allowing pavements to 

deteriorate, streets that once cost $6.00/square yard (SY) to microsurface may soon cost $49.00/SY to 

overlay, or $162.00/SY to reconstruct. In other words, delaying repairs can significantly increase 

management costs. Note that microsurfacing can be placed on approximately 8 times as many lane miles 

as those requiring overlays and on approximately 27 times as many lane miles as those requiring 

reconstruction. 

Figure 4: Costs of Maintaining Pavements over Time 

Good(I) 

Fair (II/III)

Poor (IV)

Failed (V)

40% 75% 90% 

Crack Seal or Microsurfacing 

$1.00 – 6.00/SY 

Cape Seal or HMA Overlay 

$10.50 – 29.00/SY 

HMA Overlay or CIR with HMA Overlay 

$42.00 – 49.00/SY 

Reconstruction or FDR 

 $59.00-162.00/SY 

% of Pavement Life Pavement Condition Category
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

7 

Budget Needs 

Based on the principle that it costs less to maintain streets in good condition than it does to repair those 

that have failed, cost-effective pavement management plans employ strategies to bring the overall 

condition of the network to an optimal PCI and then maintain it at that level. 

The first step in developing such a cost-effective strategy is to determine the maintenance budget needs 

of the network. This represents the cost associated with performing M&R treatments at the optimal time 

and was determined by performing a budget needs analysis in StreetSaver® with an inflation rate of 3 

percent for an analysis period of twenty years. The results of the budget needs analysis are presented in 

Table 3. The total maintenance budget needs for the network over the next twenty years is estimated 

to be $40.5 million. Of the total maintenance budget needs, approximately $10 million (25 percent) is 

devoted to preventive maintenance, while the rest is allocated for more costly rehabilitation and 

reconstruction treatments. Based on this analysis, the current deferred maintenance, which is M&R not 

performed due to insufficient funding, for the network is $13.5 million. This value is represented by the 

total budget needs (rehabilitation plus preventive maintenance) for 2021. 

Table 3: Summary Results for Needs Analysis 

Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 

Total Budget Needs ($M) 13.5 0.1 1.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.4 2.9 4.3 0.6 - 

Rehabilitation ($M) 12.6 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.9 2.7 0.3 - 

Preventive Maintenance ($M) 0.9 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 1.6 0.3 - 

Treated PCI 87 83 82 81 79 77 75 77 80 79 - 

Untreated PCI 66 64 61 59 56 54 51 49 46 44 - 

Year 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 Total

Total Budget Needs ($M) 0.8 0.1 0.9 2.5 2.9 1.3 7.0 0.1 1.0 0.5 40.5 

Rehabilitation ($M) 0.3 0.0 0.9 2.3 1.7 1.1 4.9 0.0 0.3 0.2 30.5 

Preventive Maintenance ($M) 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.2 0.2 2.1 0.1 0.7 0.3 10.0 

Treated PCI 78 76 75 76 76 75 80 78 78 76 NA 

Untreated PCI 41 39 36 34 31 29 27 25 23 22 NA 

If the Presidio follows this ideal strategy, the average network PCI will immediately increase as a large 

amount of deferred maintenance is addressed in the first year, and then stabilize in the high 70s. This type 

of budget, that addresses all the deferred maintenance in the first year, is known as front-loaded and 

represents an optimal funding approach that is not limited by budget constraints. Note that if no 

maintenance is performed for the next twenty years – including remainder of the on-going maintenance 

and rehabilitation construction project – the PCI will drop to 22. 

The unconstrained Budget Needs analysis serves as the basis for other scenarios. For reference, detailed 

results of the budget needs analysis are provided in Appendix C. 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

8 

Budget Scenarios 

The next step in developing a cost-effective treatment strategy is conducting various budget scenarios. In 

consultation with the Presidio, four funding scenarios were selected for analysis and performed using 

StreetSaver®: 

Scenario 1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50% – This scenario aims to reduce the current 

deferred maintenance value of $13.5 million by 50 percent over the next five years and then 

maintain the deferred maintenance at this reduced level for the remainder of the twenty-year 

analysis period. 

Scenario 2: Average Annual Budget of $1.7 Million/Year – This scenario assumes the Presidio has 

an average annual budget of $1.7 million per year for the next twenty years. 

Scenario 3: Maintain PCI at 70 – This scenario aims to maintain the network PCI at an average of 

70 throughout the twenty-year analysis period. 

Scenario 4: Maintain PCI at 66 – This scenario aims to maintain the network PCI at the current 

value of 66 throughout the twenty-year analysis period. 

As previously noted, the Presidio is in currently in the middle of a maintenance and rehabilitation 

construction project. Consequently, Scenario 1 assumes that additional work will be performed in 2021 

beyond the on-going construction project. Scenarios 2-4, however, assume that no additional M&R will 

be performed in 2021 beyond the on-going construction project. 

These scenarios are discussed in the following sections. The corresponding detailed results are provided 

in Appendix D. Additionally, maps illustrating the current pavement condition and the projected 2040 

pavement condition for each scenario are provided in Appendix E. 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

9 

Scenario 1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50% ($35.6 Million/20 years) 

This scenario aims to reduce the Presidio’s current deferred maintenance of $13.5 million by half over the 

next five years and then maintain it at this reduced level through 2040. As shown in Table 4 and Figure 5, 

the deferred maintenance will be reduced to $6.8 million by 2025 and then maintained. This will result in 

the network PCI increasing to 75 and being maintained at this value, plus or minus one PCI point. Note 

that this scenario assumes the Presidio will complete the current construction projects in 2021 and 

perform an additional $1 million of M&R in 2021. By 2040, the portion of the network in “Good” condition 

will reach 87.7 percent. 

To accomplish this goal, the required 20-year budget is $35.6 million. This is an average of $2.1 million per 

year for the first five years, which will reduce the deferred maintenance to the desired level, and then an 

average of $1.7 million per year for years 6-20, which maintains the deferred maintenance. 

Appendix F provides a list of candidate sections selected for treatment for this scenario. Appendix G 

illustrates the first five years of treatments recommended for this scenario in map form. 

Table 4: Summary Results for Scenario 1 

Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 

Budget ($M) 1.00 1.75 2.80 2.48 2.49 1.59 1.20 2.10 2.25 1.85 - 

Deferred Maintenance ($M) 8.5 8.1 7.7 7.4 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.8 - 

Treated PCI 72 72 74 75 75 75 74 74 75 75 - 

Year 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 Total

Budget ($M) 1.90 1.60 1.40 0.99 1.60 1.00 2.99 2.09 1.25 1.25 35.58 

Deferred Maintenance ($M) 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.8 6.7 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.8 NA 

Treated PCI 76 76 75 75 75 74 75 75 74 74 NA 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

10 

Figure 5: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1 

13.5

8.5 8.1 7.7 7.4 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.8 6.7 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.8

66

72 72 74 75 75 75 74 74 75 75 76 76 75 75 75 74 75 75 74 74

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35 PCI Deferred Maintenance ($M)

Deferred Maintenance ($M) Treated PCI
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

11 

Scenario 2: Average Annual Budget of $1.7 Million ($33.9 Million/20 years) 

Considering the funding required in the previous scenario to maintain the deferred maintenance at the 

reduced level was an average of $1.7 million per year, this scenario assumes the Presidio will have an 

average annual budget of $1.7 million per year for the entire twenty-year analysis period. This scenario 

also assumes the Presidio will complete the current construction projects in 2021 but perform no 

additional M&R work in 2021. As shown in Table 5 and Figure 6, this results in a total budget of $33.9 

million over twenty years. With this funding commitment, the network PCI will increase and be maintained 

at 72-73. By 2040, the deferred maintenance will be $9.1 million, and 80.0 percent of the network will be 

in “Good” condition. 

Table 5: Summary Results for Scenario 2 

Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 

Budget ($M) 0.00 2.09 2.09 2.10 2.10 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 - 

Deferred Maintenance ($M) 9.5 8.8 9.1 9.2 9.5 9.4 8.9 9.0 10.8 11.0 - 

Treated PCI 71 71 72 72 73 73 72 72 72 72 - 

Year 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 Total

Budget ($M) 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 33.88 

Deferred Maintenance ($M) 11.7 11.1 10.2 9.7 9.8 9.5 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.1 NA 

Treated PCI 72 72 72 72 73 73 73 73 73 72 NA 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

12 

 

Figure 6: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 2 

13.5

9.5 8.8 9.1 9.2 9.5 9.4 8.9 9.0

10.8 11.0 11.7 11.1

10.2 9.7 9.8 9.5 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.1

66

71 71 72 72 73 73 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 73 73 73 73 73 72

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35 PCI Deferred Maintenance ($M)

Deferred Maintenance ($M) Treated PCI
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

13 

Scenario 3: Maintain PCI at 70 ($31.5 Million/20 years) 

This scenario aims to maintain the network PCI at an average of 70 throughout the twenty-year analysis 

period. Since the network PCI will increase to 71 following the completion of the current construction 

projects, no additional M&R work will be performed in 2021. As shown in Table 6 and Figure 7, this will 

result in the deferred maintenance increasing to $15.5 million by 2040. Additionally, 79.7 percent of the 

network will be in “Good” condition and 13.4 percent will be in “Poor” or “Failed” condition by 2040. 

The total budget required to maintain the network PCI at 70 over the next twenty years is 31.5 million. 

This breaks down to an average of $1.2 million per year for the first five years, and then an average of 

$1.7 million per year for years 6-20. 

Table 6: Summary Results for Scenario 3 

Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 

Budget ($M) 0.00 1.49 1.50 1.50 1.60 1.79 1.89 1.90 1.90 1.79 - 

Deferred Maintenance ($M) 9.5 9.4 10.3 11.1 11.9 12.3 11.7 11.8 13.3 13.7 - 

Treated PCI 71 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 - 

Year 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 Total

Budget ($M) 1.90 1.60 1.50 1.50 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 31.46 

Deferred Maintenance ($M) 14.4 13.9 13.9 14.6 14.9 14.8 15.0 14.7 14.6 15.5 NA 

Treated PCI 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 NA 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

14 

Figure 7: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 3 

13.5

9.5 9.4

10.3

11.1

11.9 12.3 11.7 11.8

13.3 13.7 14.4 13.9 13.9 14.6 14.9 14.8 15.0 14.7 14.6

15.5

66

71 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35 PCI Deferred Maintenance ($M)

Deferred Maintenance ($M) Treated PCI
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

15 

Scenario 4: Maintain PCI at 66 ($28.9 Million/20 years) 

This scenario aims to maintain the network PCI at the current average of 66 throughout the twenty-year 

analysis period. Since the network PCI will increase to 71 following the completion of the current 

construction projects, no additional M&R work will be performed in 2021 and a minimal amount of $0.5 

million will be spent per year until the PCI drops back to 66. As shown in Table 7 and Figure 8, this will 

result in the deferred maintenance increasing to $20.3 million by 2040. Additionally, 73.1 percent of the 

network will be in “Good” condition and 17 percent will be in “Poor” or “Failed” condition by 2040. 

The total budget required to maintain the network PCI at 66 over the next twenty years is 28.9 million. 

This is an average of $0.7 million per year for the first five years, which increases to an average of $1.7 

million per year for years 6-20. 

Table 7: Summary Results for Scenario 4 

Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total 

Budget ($M) 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.60 1.80 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.80 - 

Deferred Maintenance ($M) 9.5 10.4 12.4 13.8 14.7 15.7 15.6 16.0 17.4 18.8 - 

Treated PCI 71 69 67 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 - 

Year 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 Total

Budget ($M) 1.80 1.59 1.50 1.50 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.59 1.59 28.87 

Deferred Maintenance ($M) 19.2 18.9 19.0 19.7 20.4 20.1 20.8 20.7 20.2 20.3 NA 

Treated PCI 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 NA 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

16 

Figure 8: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 4

13.5

9.5

10.4

12.4

13.8

14.7

15.7 15.6 16.0

17.4

18.8 19.2 18.9 19.0 19.7 20.4 20.1 20.8 20.7 20.2 20.3

66

71 69 67 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35 PCI Deferred Maintenance ($M)

Deferred Maintenance ($M) Treated PCI
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

17 

Scenario Comparisons 

As previously noted, the Presidio is in currently in the middle of a maintenance and rehabilitation 

construction project. When construction is completed in mid-2021, the network PCI is expected to 

increase to 71. Figure 9 compares the long-term annual average PCI for each of the scenarios previously 

discussed. 

In Scenario 1, the PCI will increase in the first five years and then stabilize at 75 plus or minus 1 PCI point. 

In Scenario 2 the PCI will increase and be maintained at 72-73. In Scenario 3 the PCI will be maintained at 

70 and in Scenario 4 the PCI will be maintained in the long term at the current PCI value of 66. In contrast, 

if no maintenance work is performed after the on-going 2021 construction is complete, the network PCI 

will drop to 27 by 2040. 

Figure 9: Comparison of Annual Pavement Condition Index by Scenario 

 

74

72

66 70

66

27 25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100 PCI

S1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50%

S2: Average Budget of $1.7M/yr

S3: Maintain PCI at 70

S4: Maintain PCI at 66

Do Nothing
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

18 

Figure 10 illustrates the changes in deferred maintenance over time for each scenario. For Scenario 1, the 

deferred maintenance will decrease by 50 percent. In Scenario 2 it will decrease by 33 percent. In Scenario 

3 it will increase by 15 percent and in Scenario 4 it will increase by 50 percent. If no maintenance work is 

performed after the on-going 2021 construction is complete, the network deferred maintenance will 

increase to 88 million (not illustrated in figure 10 for simplicity) by 2040. 

The growth in deferred maintenance for the latter three scenarios is a marked contrast to the PCI, which 

only changes by a few points. It illustrates the point that the Presidio should not use PCI only as the sole 

performance metric. 

Figure 10: Comparison of Annual Deferred Maintenance by Scenario 

 

6.8

13.5

9.1

15.5

20.3

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25 Deferred Mainteance ($M)

S1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50%

S2: Average Budget of $1.7M/yr

S3: Maintain PCI at 70

S4: Maintain PCI at 66
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

19 

Figure 11 illustrates the percent change in pavement condition for each scenario. As noted earlier, 

currently, 42.1 percent of the street network is in “Good” condition, with 22.6 percent in “Poor” or 

“Failed” condition. For Scenario 1, the portion of the network in “Good” condition will significantly 

increase, dominating the network at 87.7 percent. For Scenarios 2-4 the portion of the network in 

“Good” condition will increase relative to the current breakdown, but the portion of the network in 

“Failed” condition will also increase. Although the PCI does not change markedly in Scenarios 1-3, the 

network condition will be visibly different for users considering the percentage of “Failed” pavements 

will more than triple from Scenario 1 to 3. In contrast, if no maintenance work is performed after the ongoing 2021 construction is complete, pavements in “Poor” or “Failed” condition will compose nearly 

three-quarters of the network by 2040. 

Figure 11: Comparison of Pavement Condition by Scenario 

54.1%

14.1%

9.9%5.1% 4.2% 3.1%

19.6% 2.9% 3.5% 2.9%

0.8%

19.5%

25.7% 9.9%

6.9%

12.0%

7.3%

35.3%

0.6%

73.1%

79.7%

80.0%

87.7%

42.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Do Nothing

S4: Maintain PCI at 66

(Projected 2040

Condition)

S3: Maintain PCI at 70

(Projected 2040

Condition)

S2: Average Budget of

$1.7M/yr (Projected

2040 Condition)

S1: Reduce Deferred

Maintenance by 50%

(Projected 2040

Condition)

Current Condition

Percent of Network

Failed Poor Fair Good
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

20 

Summary 

In summary, the Presidio Trust has a substantial investment of $94 million in the pavement network. 

Overall, the Presidio’s streets and parking lots are in “Fair” condition with an average PCI of 66. 

Approximately 42.1 percent of the network is in “Good” condition with 3.1 percent in “Failed” condition. 

The analyses indicate that the Presidio needs to spend approximately $40.5 million on maintenance and 

rehabilitation over the next twenty years to essentially repair all streets and parking lots. This will 

eliminate the deferred maintenance and bring the network into a condition that can be maintained with 

on-going preventive maintenance. In the long run, this strategy will save the Presidio money by preventing 

future pavement deterioration to levels requiring rehabilitation or reconstruction. 

The four alternative budget scenarios together show an interesting trend: regardless of what the longterm goal is, the average annual cost to maintain the network in years 6-20 is the same ($1.7 million per 

year). This means that the amount spent on M&R in the first five years has a significant impact on the 

long-term condition of the pavement network. 

Scenario specifics are provided below: 

 Scenario 1 – an average of $2.1 million per year for years 1-5 will bring the network up to a PCI of 

75, after which it can be maintained at that level for $1.7 million per year. 

 Scenario 2 – an average of $1.7 million for years 1-5 will bring the network up to a PCI of 72, after 

which it can be maintained at that level for $1.7 million per year. 

 Scenario 3 – an average of $1.2 million per year for years 1-5 will bring the PCI to a 70, after which 

it can be maintained at that level for $1.7 million per year. 

 Scenario 4 – an average of $0.7 million per year for years 1-5 will allow the PCI to drop back down 

to the current level of 66, after which it can be maintained at that level for $1.7 million per year. 

The difference in PCI for each of these scenarios is just a few points. However, the network condition 

breakdown and network deferred maintenance reveal a more marked difference between these 

scenarios. For example, the portion of the network in “Failed” condition more than triples between 

Scenario 1 and Scenario 4. Additionally, Scenario 1 decreases the deferred maintenance by 50 percent, 

Scenario 2 decreases it by 33 percent, Scenario 3 increases it by 15 percent, and Scenario 4 increases it by 

50 percent. 

In contrast to these four scenarios, if no maintenance work is performed after the on-going 2021 

construction is complete, the network PCI will drop to 27 by 2040, the deferred maintenance will increase 

to 88 million, and pavements in “Poor” or “Failed” condition will comprise nearly three-quarters of the 

network. 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

21 

Recommendations 

Based on the data collected and the scenarios analyzed and presented in this report, NCE offers the 

following recommendations. 

1. Funding 

The primary goal of PMPs should be to offer users a safe and functional pavement network without 

unduly increasing the maintenance burden in the future. Therefore, the recommended scenario for 

the Presidio is Scenario 1, which requires $35.6 million over the next twenty years. This budget 

allocation will reduce the current deferred maintenance by 50 percent in the first five years and then 

maintain it at the reduced level. This funding commitment will result in the PCI increasing to and being 

maintained at 75. The portion of the network in “Good” condition will more than double and the 

portion “Poor” and “Failed” condition will decrease by 78 percent. 

2. Pavement Maintenance Strategies 

Since over 40 percent of the Presidio’s streets are currently in “Good” condition, it is important to 

maintain that condition to the extent possible. Preservation occurs when streets with PCIs higher than 

70 receive treatments such as surface seals (slurry, microsurfacing, etc.). Seals are relatively 

inexpensive treatments that prevent moisture ingress and thus preserve the integrity of the 

underlying base material. NCE recommends that the Presidio balance preventive maintenance with 

rehabilitation and reconstruction projects to preserve pavements in “Good” condition, improve 

pavements in “Poor” condition, and avoid increasing the deferred maintenance. 

3. Re-inspection Strategies 

In order to make appropriate management decisions based on current data, NCE recommends that 

the Presidio perform condition inspections on arterials and collectors every two years and on 

residentials at least every four to five years. 

Since StreetSaver® and other prediction models do not yet take into account the effect of newer and 

more cost-effective technologies such as asphalt-binders with rubber or polymers, the actual 

performance of these treatments may not be adequately represented in the models. For this 

additional reason, NCE recommends regular pavement condition surveys to ensure model accuracy 

and relevance. 

4. M&R Decision Tree 

NCE recommends that the Presidio annually review and update the M&R treatment strategies and 

associated unit costs to reflect new construction techniques and changing costs. This will ensure that 

the results for the budget analyses are reliable and as accurate as possible. 
Presidio Trust 

2020/21 Pavement Management Program Update FINAL Report 

22 

Considering volatility in oil and curb ramp prices, the future cost of construction is unknown and 

unpredictable. NCE therefore recommends careful monitoring of construction costs and preparations 

to adapt to cost changes as necessary. 
APPENDIX A 

 
Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. 

Section Description Inventory Report

This report lists a variety of section description information for each of the Presidio’s pavement sections. 

It lists the street and section identifiers, limits, functional class, general code, surface type, number of 

lanes, length, width, area, PCI date, and Inspected PCI. 

All of the Presidio’s pavement sections are included in the report. Two versions of the report are 

provided. The first is sorted alphabetically by Street Name and Section ID and the second report is sorted 

by descending PCI. The field descriptions in this report are listed below: 

COLUMN DESCRIPTION

Street ID Street Identification - A code up to ten characters/digits to identify the street. Generally, the street 

name is truncated to six characters. The Street ID should be unique for each street. 

Section ID Section Identification - A code up to ten characters/digits to identify the section number. The 

Section ID must be unique for each section of one street. 

Street Name Street Name - The name of the street as indicated by street signs in the field. 

Begin Location Beginning limit of the section. 

End Location Ending limit of the section. 

Functional Class (FC) Functional Classification: A = Arterial, C = Collector, R = Residential, O = Other 

General Code P = Parking Lot, ST = Street, TR = Trail 

Surface Type (ST) Surface Type (A = AC Pavement, AC/AC = Asphalt Concrete Overlay). 

No. of Lanes Number of travel lanes. 

Length (ft) Length of the section in feet. 

Width (ft) Average width of the section in feet. 

Area (sf) Area of section in square feet. 

PCI Date The last inspection date or rehabilitation date. 

PCI Average PCI for the section. The value is based on the last inspection. 
Section Description Inventory – Sorted by Street Name 
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Street Name

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

FHA640 10 AMATURY LOOP PARK BLVD SOUTH PARK BLVD NORTH R ST AC/AC 2 1,267 22 45,696 12/31/2020 100

900zP P1 ANZA PARKING ANZA AVE MIDDLE ANZA AVE NORTH O P AC 1 342 108 36,936 1/16/2021 100

900zP P2 ANZA PARKING ANZA AVE SOUTH ANZA AVE MIDDLE O P AC 1 718 108 77,544 1/19/2021 33

FHA444 10 ANZA ST SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD R ST AC 2 1,162 28 32,536 12/8/2020 29

FHA703 10 ANZA TRAIL 14TH AVE WEDEMEYER ST O TR AC 2 1,200 8 9,600 12/11/2020 79

FHA708 10 ANZA TRAIL SPUR WEDEMEYER AVE WEDEMEYER PARKING O TR AC 2 80 6 480 12/11/2020 85

FHA708 20 ANZA TRAIL SPUR WEDEMEYER AVE WEDEMEYER PARKING O TR AC 2 200 6 1,200 12/11/2020 85

FHA643 10 APPLETON ST RUCKMAN AVE STOREY AVE R ST AC 2 1,003 16 16,048 12/14/2020 38

FHA013 10 ARGUELLO BLVD SOUTH PARK ENTRANCE WASHINGTON BLVD A ST AC/AC 2 1,160 46 53,360 12/7/2020 90

FHA013 30 ARGUELLO BLVD WASHINGTON BLVD MORAGA AVE A ST AC 2 2,048 28 68,544 12/7/2020 77

FHA013 40 ARGUELLO BLVD MORAGA AVE SHERIDAN AVE A ST AC 2 400 28 11,200 12/7/2020 31

FHA649 10 ARMISTEAD RD LINCOLN BLVD LENDRUM CT R ST AC 2 1,162 24 36,892 12/16/2020 32

FHA626 20 BAKER CT BROOK ST END PARKING R ST AC/AC 2 241 40 16,243 12/16/2020 95

FHA450 10 BARNARD AVE PRESIDIO BLVD HICKS PARKING R ST AC 2 1,426 20 28,520 12/7/2020 47

PT702 10 BATTERY CAULFIELD 

CONNECTOR RD PERSHING DR. BATTERY CAULFIELD RD. C ST AC 1 300 11 3,150 12/16/2020 100 

FHA603 10 BATTERY CAULFIELD RD WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG 1450 C ST AC/AC 2 412 24 9,888 1/27/2021 87

FHA603 20 BATTERY CAULFIELD RD BLDG 1450 WEDEMEYER ST C ST AC 2 697 24 16,728 12/10/2020 26

FHA401 10 BATTERY DYNAMITE RD LINCOLN BLVD RALSTON AVE R ST GRAVEL 1 528 15 7,920 NA NA

PT701 10 BATTERY SAFFOLD RD KOBBE AVE. BLDG 1351 R ST AC 1 265 14 3,710 12/16/2020 70

FHA646 10 BATTERY WAGNER RD STOREY AVENUE STOREY AVENUE R ST AC 2 739 30 27,416 12/14/2020 47

FHA633 10 BELLES ST WYMAN AVE HAYS ST R ST PCC 1 461 20 9,220 12/11/2020 91

901tN 10 BIRMINGHAM RD GEN KENNEDY AVE GORGAS AVE R ST AC 1 271 18 4,878 12/8/2020 56

FHA688 10 BLISS RD INFANTRY TERRACE MONTGOMERY ST R ST AC 2 317 30 9,510 12/7/2020 63

FHA690 10 BOWLEY ST LINCOLN BLVD NORTH LINVOLN BLVD SOUTH R ST AC 1 1,455 35 50,925 1/16/2021 68

FHA706 10 BROADWAY GATE 

CONNECTION BROADWAY AND LYON ST PRESIDIO BLVD O TR AC 2 475 12 5,700 12/17/2020 42 

FHA626 10 BROOKS ST LINCOLN BLVD END PARKING R ST AC/AC 2 724 40 37,031 12/16/2020 95

FHA634 10 BROWN ST WYMAN AVE HAYS ST R ST AC 1 219 18 3,942 12/11/2020 93

FHA634 20 BROWN ST HAYS ST BELLES ST R ST PCC 1 390 17 6,630 12/11/2020 91

901fcP P1 BUILDING 1013 PARKING RTE 457 TORNEY AVE BLDG 1013 O P AC 1 34 40 1,372 12/8/2020 67

901kP P1 BUILDING 1016 PARKING LINCOLN BLVD NORTH TORNEY AVE O P AC 1 260 16 4,160 1/16/2021 70

901iP P1 BUILDING 1027 PARKING RTE 607 EDIE RD BLDG 1027 O P AC 2 91 40 3,633 12/8/2020 91

901gP P1 BUILDING 1028 PARKING RTE 607 EDIE RD BLDG 1028 O P AC 2 1,696 40 67,835 12/8/2020 73

901hP P1 BUILDING 1028 SERVICE RTE 458 GIRARD RD BLDG 1028 O P AC 1 516 16 8,255 12/8/2020 78

901vP P1 BUILDING 1029 PARKING RTE 458 GIRARD RD BLDG 1029 O P AC 1 2,028 40 81,131 12/17/2020 98

901jP P1 BUILDING 1040 PARKING RTE 607 EDIE RD BLDG 1040 O P AC 2 75 25 1,883 12/8/2020 10

901tP P1 BUILDING 1060 PARKING RTE 455 GORGAS AVE BLDG 1062 O P AC 1 731 40 29,258 12/8/2020 57

901sP P1 BUILDING 1062 PARKING RTE 459 THORNBURG RD BIRMINGHAM RD O P AC 1 262 40 10,469 12/8/2020 95

901pP P1 BUILDING 1160 PARKING RTE 455 GORGAS AVE BLDG 1160 O P AC 2 127 40 5,098 12/8/2020 95

901qP P1 BUILDING 1163/67/69/70 

PARKING RTE 455 GORGAS AVE BLDGS 1167-1170 O P AC 2 1,552 40 62,071 12/8/2020 96 

909mP P1 BUILDING 1183-85 PARKING EAST OF MARSHALL BLDG 1184 AND 1185 O P AC 1 2,014 40 80,550 12/9/2020 78

909bP P1 BUILDING 1188 PARKING RTE 464 LUNDEEN ST EAST BOUNDARY O P AC 2 302 40 12,081 12/8/2020 85

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 1/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Street Name

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

903hfP P1 BUILDING 1202/1203 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1202/1203 O P AC 1 76 40 3,025 12/11/2020 29 

903heP P1 BUILDING 1203/1204 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1203/1204 O P AC 1 64 40 2,576 12/11/2020 29 

903hdP P1 BUILDING 1204/1205 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1204/1205 O P AC 1 86 40 3,426 12/11/2020 33 

903hcP P1 BUILDING 1205/1206 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1205/1206 O P AC 1 71 40 2,836 12/11/2020 36 

903hbP P1 BUILDING 1206/1207 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1206/1207 O P AC 1 80 40 3,224 12/11/2020 55 

903haP P1 BUILDING 1207/1208 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1207/1208 O P AC 1 73 40 2,938 12/11/2020 31 

903kP P1 BUILDING 1228/1230 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE RTE 620 UPTON AVE FROM 

STOREY 

O P AC 2 1,841 40 73,673 12/11/2020 48 

903mP P1 BUILDING 1241-45 PARKING RTE 643 APPLETON ST BLDG 1241 O P AC 2 1,082 40 43,311 12/14/2020 20

903nP P1 BUILDING 1249 PARKING RTE 643 APPLETON ST BLDG 1249 O P AC 1 1,104 32 41,660 12/14/2020 29

903fP P1 BUILDING 1299 PARKING RTE 628 STOREY AVE LOG CABIN - BLDG 1299 O P AC 2 553 40 22,143 12/14/2020 28

900pP P1 BUILDING 130 PARKING RTE 441 FISHER LOOP BLDG 130 O P AC 2 586 40 23,442 12/14/2020 87

903qaP P1 BUILDING 1331 PARKING

RTE 623 KOBBE AVE 

NORTHSIDE TENNIS OVERLOOK 1331 O P AC 1 467 40 18,695 12/10/2020 95 

903vP P1 BUILDING 1340 PARKING RTE 623 KOBBE AVE BLDG 1340 O P AC 1 135 12 1,629 12/15/2020 66

903uP P1 BUILDING 1347 PARKING RTE 623 KOBBE AVE BLDG 1347 O P AC 1 259 40 10,356 12/10/2020 36

900oP P1 BUILDING 135 PARKING RTE 441 FISHER LOOP BLDG 135 O P AC 1 385 24 9,240 1/16/2021 64

900oP P2 BUILDING 135 WEST PARKING RTE 441 FISHER LOOP BLDG 135 O P AC 1 431 40 17,260 12/14/2020 70 

903ebP P2 BUILDING 1388 PARKING BUILDING 1299 PARKING BLDG 1388 O P GRAVEL 1 1,299 40 51,965 NA NA

903pP P1 BUILDING 1389 PARKING STOREY AVE BLDG 1389 O P AC 1 1,023 40 40,947 1/16/2021 37

906fcP P1 BUILDING 1414 PARKING RTE 012 WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG 1414 O P AC 1 60 40 2,415 12/10/2020 60

906fbP P1 BUILDING 1416 PARKING RTE 012 WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG 1416 O P AC 1 86 40 3,431 12/10/2020 50

906faP P1 BUILDING 1418/1420 PARKING RTE 012 WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG 1418/1420 O P AC 1 70 40 2,812 12/10/2020 60 

906edP P1 BUILDING 1432 PARKING RTE 603 BATTERY CAULFIELD BLDG 1432 O P AC 1 224 40 8,973 12/10/2020 67

906ebP P1 BUILDING 1440-1443 PARKING RTE 603 BATTERY CAULFIELD BLDG 1440-1443 O P AC 1 195 40 7,825 12/10/2020 47 

906ecP P1 BUILDING 1449/1450 PARKING RTE 603 BATTERY CAULFIELD BLDG 1449 O P AC 1 44 30 1,330 12/10/2020 85 

906eaP P1 BUILDING 1450/1451 PARKING RTE 603 BATTERY CAULFIELD BLDG 1451 O P GRAVEL 2 291 40 11,665 NA NA

906xtP P1 BUILDING 1501 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1501 O P AC 1 127 16 2,045 12/15/2020 99

906xsP P1 BUILDING 1502 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1502 O P AC 1 117 16 1,887 12/15/2020 99

906xrP P1 BUILDING 1503-7 ODD 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1503-1507 O P AC 1 627 16 10,035 12/15/2020 99 

906xqP P1 BUILDING 1504 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1504 O P AC 1 156 16 2,501 12/15/2020 99

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 2/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Street Name

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

906xnP P1 BUILDING 1506/1508 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1506-1508 O P AC 1 244 16 3,910 12/15/2020 98 

906xpP P1 BUILDING 1509 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1509 O P AC 1 140 16 2,249 12/15/2020 89

906xkP P1 BUILDING 1510-14 EVEN 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1510-1514 O P AC 1 392 16 6,272 12/15/2020 99 

906xmP P1 BUILDING 1511 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1511 O P AC 1 273 16 4,370 12/15/2020 75

906xlP P1 BUILDING 1513 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1513 O P AC 1 211 16 3,387 12/15/2020 68

906xjP P1 BUILDING 1515 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1515 O P AC 1 106 16 1,702 12/15/2020 76

906ygP P1 BUILDING 

1516/1578/1580PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1516/1578/1580 O P AC 1 467 15 7,007 12/15/2020 99 

906xiP P1 BUILDING 1517/1519 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1517-1519 O P AC 1 279 16 4,472 12/15/2020 99 

906xgP P1 BUILDING 1518/1580 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1518/1580 O P AC 1 190 16 3,050 12/15/2020 99 

906xeP P1 BUILDING 1520 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1520 O P AC 1 274 16 4,398 12/15/2020 99

906xhP P1 BUILDING 1521 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1521 O P AC 1 64 16 1,037 12/15/2020 66

906xcP P1 BUILDING 1524/1526 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1524-1526 O P AC 1 226 16 3,620 12/15/2020 95 

906xfP P1 BUILDING 1525 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1525 O P AC 1 107 16 1,726 12/15/2020 99

906xdP P1 BUILDING 1527/1529 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1527-1529 O P AC 1 110 16 1,766 12/15/2020 57 

906cjP P1 BUILDING 

1528/1545/1547PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1547 O P AC 1 487 15 7,317 12/15/2020 99 

906chP P1 BUILDING 1530-44 EVEN 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1534/1542/1544 O P AC 1 913 15 13,703 12/15/2020 99 

906xbP P1 BUILDING 1533 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1533 O P AC 1 151 16 2,431 12/15/2020 99

906xaP P1 BUILDING 1535-43 ODD 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1535-1543 O P AC 1 896 16 14,342 12/15/2020 99 

906cfP P1 BUILDING 1546-50 EVEN 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1548 O P AC 1 309 15 4,640 12/15/2020 99 

906ciP P1 BUILDING 1549 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1551 O P AC 1 245 15 3,678 12/15/2020 99

906cdP P1 BUILDING 1552-58 EVEN 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1552-1558 O P AC 1 333 15 5,003 12/15/2020 99 

906cgP P1 BUILDING 1555-59 ODD 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1555 O P AC 1 299 15 4,990 12/15/2020 99 

906cbP P1 BUILDING 1562-66 EVEN 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1562-1566 O P GRAVEL 1 287 15 4,317 NA NA

906ccP P1 BUILDING 1567-73 ODD 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1567-1573 O P AC 1 416 15 6,243 12/15/2020 99 

906caP P1 BUILDING 1575/1577 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1575-1577 O P AC 1 331 15 4,969 12/15/2020 80 

906ceP P1 BUILDING 1582/84/61/63/65 

PARK

STILLWELL RD PERSHING DR O P AC 1 865 15 12,978 12/15/2020 99 

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 3/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Street Name

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

906yeP P1 BUILDING 1583/1585 PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1583/1585 O P AC 1 257 15 3,861 12/15/2020 99 

906yfP P1 BUILDING 1586 PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1586 O P AC 1 106 15 1,594 12/15/2020 99

906ycP P1 BUILDING 1587/1589 PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1587/1589 O P AC 1 314 15 4,717 12/15/2020 99 

906ydP P1 BUILDING 1588/1590 PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1588/1590 O P AC 1 408 15 6,120 12/15/2020 99 

906yaP P1 BUILDING 1591 PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1591 O P AC 1 311 15 4,672 12/15/2020 95

906ybP P1 BUILDING 1592/1594 PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1592/1594 O P AC 1 183 15 2,748 12/15/2020 99 

908aP P1 BUILDING 1750 PARKING

RTE 010 LINCOLN W. 

ENTRANCE BLDG 1750 O P AC 1 1,973 40 78,930 12/16/2020 52 

908bN P1 BUILDING 1752 PARKING

RTE 010 LINCOLN W. 

ENTRANCE BLDG 1752 O P AC 1 615 40 24,625 12/16/2020 44 

908cP P1 BUILDING 1770-1781 PARKING RTE 684 GIBSON RD BLDG 1781 O P AC 1 862 29 25,019 12/16/2020 85 

907aaP P1 BUILDING 1801 PARKING WEDEMEYER ST BLDG 1801 O P AC 1 1,611 24 38,664 12/11/2020 95

907dP P1 BUILDING 1808 NORTH 

PARKING RTE 428 WEDEMEYER ST END (N/O BLDG 1808) O P AC 1 186 60 11,160 12/11/2020 95 

907abP P2 BUILDING 1808 SOUTH 

PARKING RTE 428 WEDEMEYER ST BLDG 1808 O P AC 2 771 40 30,843 12/11/2020 93 

907cP P1 BUILDING 1818/1819 PARKING RTE 428 WEDEMEYER ST BLDG 1818 O P AC 1 309 17 5,256 12/11/2020 95 

900gP P1 BUILDING 210 PARKING LINCOLN BLVD

 BLDG 210 (POST 

OFFICE/VISITOR'S CENTER) O P AC 1 353 40 14,105 1/16/2021 100 

900fP P1 BUILDING 211 PARKING RTE 452 HALLECK ST BLDG 211 O P AC 1 834 40 33,360 12/9/2020 58

900yP P1 BUILDING 218 PARKING GRAHAM ST BLDG 218 O P AC 1 96 65 6,240 1/16/2021 72

900fP P2 BUILDING 220 PARKING RTE 452 HALLECK ST BLDG 220 O P AC 1 760 40 30,400 1/16/2021 54

900eP P1 BUILDING 222-229 PARKING RTE 452 HALLECK ST BLDG 222-228 O P AC/AC 2 710 40 28,400 1/16/2021 100

906kP P1 BUILDING 300 PARKING ARGUELLO END O P AC 1 1,916 24 45,984 1/16/2021 78

900xP P1 BUILDING 36/37 PARKING RTE 445 GRAHAM ST BLDG 36 O P AC/AC 2 430 40 17,213 12/9/2020 99

900kbP P1 BUILDING 38 PARKING MESA ST BUILDING 38 O P AC 1 205 25 5,125 1/16/2021 85

900vP P1 BUILDING 381-2 PARKING RTE 669 THOMAS AVE BLDG 381-382 O P AC 1 216 40 8,646 12/10/2020 56

900qP P1 BUILDING 385 PARKING RTE 449 MORAGA AVE BLDG 387 O P AC 2 637 40 25,488 12/9/2020 49

900kaP P1 BUILDING 39 PARKING RTE 447 MESA ST BLDG 39 O P AC 2 245 40 9,826 12/8/2020 25

900tP P1 BUILDING 50 PARKING RTE 013 ARGUELLO BLVD BLDG 50 O P AC 2 52 50 2,600 1/16/2021 85

901dP P1 BUILDING 558 PARKING RTE 015 PRESIDIO BLVD BLDG 558 O P AC 1 250 40 10,000 12/9/2020 70

902pbP P1 BUILDING 569/572 PARKING RTE 685 RUGER ST BLDG 569/572 O P AC 1 310 40 12,422 12/7/2020 56

900bP P1 BUILDING 610 EAST PARKING RTE 602 MASON ST BLDG 610 O P AC 1 500 210 105,000 12/9/2020 82

900aP P1 BUILDING 610 WEST PARKING RTE 602 MASON ST BLDG 610 O P AC 2 1,074 41 44,034 12/9/2020 81 

900lP P1 BUILDING 63 PARKING RTE 448 FUNSTON AVE BLDG 63 O P AC 2 1,630 40 65,225 12/8/2020 66

909iP P1 BUILDING 641/643 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 641/643 O P PCC 1 151 60 9,056 12/9/2020 24

909hP P1 BUILDING 643/644 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 643/644 O P PCC 1 103 60 6,198 12/9/2020 24

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 4/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Street Name

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

909gP P1 BUILDING 644/649 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 644/649 O P PCC 1 301 60 18,072 12/9/2020 54

909fP P1 BUILDING 649-51 PARKING MASSON ST BLDG 649-651 O P AC 1 565 40 22,580 12/9/2020 55

909caP P1 BUILDING 650 BACK PARKING MCDOWELL AVE BLDG 650 O P GRAVEL 1 186 14 2,617 NA NA

909cbP P1 BUILDING 651 PARKING MCDOWELL AVE BLDG 651 O P PCC 1 166 20 3,332 1/16/2021 29

905aP P1 BUILDING 662 PARKING RTE 657 MCDOWELL AVE BLDG 661 O P AC 2 2,176 20 43,524 12/14/2020 67

905bP P1 BUILDING 667/668 PARKING RTE 657 MCDOWELL AVE BLDG 667 O P AC 1 1,261 40 50,456 12/14/2020 65

900wP P1 BUILDING 67 PARKING RTE 454 MARTINEZ AVE BLDG 67 O P AC 2 215 40 8,600 12/17/2020 82

905cP P1 BUILDING 682 PARKING PARK BLVD BLDG 682 O P AC 1 415 40 16,600 1/16/2021 47

902iaP P1 BUILDING 777 PARKING RTE 674 MORTON ST BLDG 777 O P AC 2 132 40 5,291 12/7/2020 69

902ibP P1 BUILDING 779 PARKING RTE 674 MORTON ST BLDG 779 O P AC 1 63 40 2,508 12/7/2020 73

902jP P1 BUILDING 808/809 PARKING RTE 451 FERNANDEZ ST BLDG 808 O P AC 2 93 40 3,708 12/7/2020 76

900jP P1 BUILDING 87 PARKING RTE 445 GRAHAM ST BLDG 85-87 O P AC 2 210 40 8,400 1/16/2021 75

909eP P1 BUILDING 920/924 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 920/924 O P AC 1 836 40 33,455 12/9/2020 38

909kP P1 BUILDING 924/926 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 924/926 O P AC 1 183 60 11,005 12/9/2020 85

900rP P1 BUILDING 93 PARKING RTE 443 MONTGOMERY BLDG 93 O P AC 1 537 40 21,494 1/16/2021 57

909dP P1 BUILDING 937 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 937 O P AC 1 80 50 4,000 12/9/2020 85

903aP P1 BUILDING 951 PARKING RTE 652 HOFFMAN ST BLDG 951 O P AC 2 286 40 11,453 12/17/2020 43

FHA605 10 CANBY ST KEYES ST MESA ST R ST AC/AC 2 158 24 3,792 12/8/2020 55

FHA425 10 CENTRAL MAGAZINE RD WASHINGTON BLVD END R ST AC 2 634 24 15,216 12/10/2020 58

FHA677 10 CLARK ST LIGGETT AVE LOOP LIGGETT AVE R ST AC 1 845 15 12,675 12/17/2020 81

FHA629 10 COMPTON RD WASHINGTON BLVD WEST WASHINGTON BLVD EAST R ST AC 2 1,250 24 29,995 12/10/2020 59

FHA655 10 COWLES ST LINCOLN BLVD MCDOWELL AVE R ST AC 2 640 20 12,800 12/14/2020 43

FHA654 40 CRISSY FIELD AVE MCDOWELL AVE LINCOLN BLVD WEST O TR AC/PCC 2 986 20 19,720 12/16/2020 40

FHA666 10 DEEMS RD WASHINGTON BLVD RESERVOIR PARKING R ST PCC 2 370 12 4,440 12/10/2020 15

906jP 10 DUDLEY RD PIPER LOOP END R ST AC/AC 1 377 13 7,166 12/10/2020 62

FHA607 10 EDIE RD GIRARD RD OREILLY AVE R ST AC 2 810 24 19,440 12/8/2020 48

FHA451 10 FERNANDEZ ST - FERNANDEZ BARNARD AVE MACARTHUR AVE R ST AC 2 370 19 7,030 12/7/2020 67

FHA441 10 FISHER LOOP SHERIDAN AVE END OF LOOP R ST AC 2 1,923 20 38,478 12/14/2020 72

900mP P1 FITNESS PARKING RTE 015 PRESIDIO BLVD END O P AC 1 315 60 18,900 12/17/2020 87

FHA453 10 FRENCH CT GRAHAM ST HALLECK ST C ST AC 2 305 24 7,320 1/16/2021 43

FHA448 20 FUNSTON AVE MORAGA AVE HARDIE AVE R ST PCC 2 176 23 4,048 12/9/2020 45

FHA448 10 FUNSTON AVE - FUNSTON MORAGA AVE LINCOLN BLVD C ST AC 2 1,637 32 52,384 12/7/2020 74

902rP P1 GARDENER PARKING RUGER RUGER O P AC 1 770 22 16,940 12/7/2020 59

FHA458 20 GEN KENNEDY AVE TORNEY AVE EDIE ROAD R ST AC 2 592 34 20,128 12/8/2020 77

FHA458 30 GEN KENNEDY AVE EDIE ROAD BIRMINGHAM PARKING R ST AC/AC 2 200 34 6,800 12/8/2020 80

901lP P1 GENERAL KENNEDY PARKING GENERAL KENNEDY AVE O'REILLY AVE O P AC 1 107 100 10,700 12/8/2020 90

902aP 10 GIBBON CT SIMONDS LOOP END R ST AC 1 314 17 5,202 12/9/2020 73

FHA684 10 GIBSON RD BOWLEY ST WATER PLANT R ST AC 2 528 20 10,560 12/16/2020 28

45 10 GIRARD RD LINCOLN BLVD EDIE RD A ST AC 2 581 45 26,145 12/8/2020 95

FHA456 20 GIRARD RD EDIE RD GORGAS AVE A ST AC 2 454 28 12,712 12/8/2020 86

FHA455 10 GORGAS AVE EAST ENTRANCE KENDALL DR C ST AC 2 1,262 50 63,100 12/8/2020 34

FHA455 20 GORGAS AVE KENDALL DR GIRARD RD C ST AC 2 302 50 15,100 12/8/2020 86

FHA455 30 GORGAS TR GORGAS AVE LYON ST O TR AC 2 130 12 1,560 12/8/2020 95

FHA445 10 GRAHAM ST LINCOLN BLVD MORAGA AVE C ST AC 2 1,637 32 52,384 12/16/2020 40

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 5/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Street Name

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

FHA445 20 GRAHAM ST FRENCH COURT LINCOLN BLVD C ST AC 2 381 38 14,478 12/16/2020 100

FHA637 10 GREENOUGH AVE RALSTON AVE KOBBE. AVE R ST AC 2 787 20 17,229 12/11/2020 30

FHA452 10 HALLECK ST LINCOLN BLVD FRENCH CT C ST AC 2 415 38 15,770 12/9/2020 59

FHA452 20 HALLECK ST FRENCH CT MASON ST C ST AC 2 730 38 27,740 12/9/2020 59

900uP P1 HARDIE AVE PARKING FUNSTON AVE BLDG 50 O P AC 1 562 40 22,484 1/16/2021 94

FHA636 10 HARRISON BLVD WASHINGTON BLVD KOBBE AVE R ST AC/AC 2 581 24 13,944 12/10/2020 85

FHA631 10 HAYS ST WEDEMEYER ST BROWN ST R ST AC 1 572 17 9,724 12/11/2020 95

FHA638 10 HITCHCOCK ST PARK BLVD HARRISON BLVD R ST AC 2 2,640 18 49,028 12/11/2020 77

FHA652 10 HOFFMAN ST ARMISTEAD RD LINCOLN BLVD R ST AC/AC 2 1,109 24 26,616 12/16/2020 97

FHA403 10 INCINERATOR RD PATTEN RD END O TR GRAVEL 1 385 15 5,775 NA NA

FHA668 10 INFANTRY TERRACE SHERIDAN AVE MORAGA C ST AC 2 600 23 13,800 12/7/2020 59

FHA668 20 INFANTRY TERRACE MORAGA ARGUELLO C ST AC 2 2,146 23 49,358 12/7/2020 74

910bP P1 INSPIRATION POINT RTE 013 ARGUELLO BLVD INSPIRATION POINT O P AC 2 532 40 21,290 12/10/2020 74

FHA460 10 KENDALL DR EDIE RD GORGAS AVE R ST AC 2 370 20 7,400 12/17/2020 71

FHA446 20 KEYES AVE CANBY ST LINCOLN BLVD R ST AC/AC 2 538 26 34,320 12/8/2020 64

FHA446 30 KEYES AVE PENA ST CANBY ST R ST AC 2 782 26 34,320 12/8/2020 81

FHA611 10 KINZEY ST RALSTON AVE EAST RALSTON AVE WEST R ST AC 1 422 22 9,284 1/16/2021 39

FHA623 10 KOBBE AVE LINCOLN BLVD PARK BLVD C ST AC 2 3,379 28 97,712 12/10/2020 67

FHA650 10 LENDRUM CT LINCOLN BLVD END R ST AC 2 792 19 17,804 12/16/2020 31

FHA436 10 LETTERMAN DR PRESIDIO BLVD LOMBARD ST C ST AC/AC 2 1,320 28 37,719 12/8/2020 53

FHA675 10 LIGGETT AVE PRESIDIO BLVD END OF LOOP R ST AC 2 1,637 20 32,740 12/7/2020 79

FHA010 10 LINCOLN BLVD WEST ENTRANCE PERSHING DR SOUTH A ST AC 2 2,165 42 90,930 12/16/2020 60

FHA010 20 LINCOLN BLVD PERSHING DR SOUTH KOBBE AV A ST AC 2 2,640 37 97,680 12/16/2020 58

FHA010 30 LINCOLN BLVD KOBBE AVE MERCHANT/STOREY A ST AC/AC 2 2,335 32 74,720 12/16/2020 89

FHA010 35 LINCOLN BLVD MERCHANT/STOREY GG BRIDGE PLAZA ENTRANCE A ST AC 2 1,145 38 43,510 12/16/2020 23 

FHA010 42 LINCOLN BLVD GG BRIDGE PLAZA ENTRANCE LONG AVE A ST AC 2 1,080 38 41,040 12/16/2020 55

FHA010 43 LINCOLN BLVD LONG AVE LENDRUM CT A ST AC 2 470 38 17,860 12/16/2020 55

FHA010 46 LINCOLN BLVD LENDRUM CT 101 OVERPASS A ST AC 2 710 32 22,720 12/10/2020 78

FHA010 47 LINCOLN BLVD 101 OVERPASS STOREY AVE A ST AC 2 718 32 22,976 12/16/2020 85

FHA010 50 LINCOLN BLVD STOREY PATTEN A ST AC 2 1,760 28 49,280 12/16/2020 56

FHA010 60 LINCOLN BLVD PATTEN SHERIDAN AV A ST AC 2 1,060 26 27,560 12/16/2020 89

FHA010 80 LINCOLN BLVD MONTGOMERY ST PRESIDIO BLVD A ST AC 2 1,900 40 76,000 12/14/2020 95

FHA438 10 LOMBARD ST PRESIDIO BLVD LETTERMAN A ST AC/AC 2 689 32 22,048 12/10/2020 68

FHA438 20 LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR LYON ST A ST AC/AC 2 578 32 18,496 12/10/2020 40

901bP P1 LOMBARD ST PULL-OUT 

PARKING RTE 438 LOMBARD ST EAST ENTRANCE O P AC 2 69 40 2,756 12/8/2020 85 

903wP P1 LOT D PARKING LINCOLN RALSTON AND BLDG 1369 O P AC 1 400 135 54,000 1/16/2021 62

FHA701 10 LOVERS' LANE PRESIDIO GATE PRESIDIO BLVD O TR AC 2 3,100 6 18,600 12/9/2020 59

FHA016 10 MACARTHUR AVE PRESIDIO BLVD EL POLIN LOOP C ST AC 2 2,323 27 66,986 12/7/2020 77

903jP P1 MAINTENANCE AREA PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1355 O P AC 2 2,530 40 101,203 12/14/2020 46 

FHA454 10 MARTINEZ ST FUNSTON AVE PRESIDIO BLVD R ST AC 1 686 12 8,232 12/7/2020 76

FHA602 10 MASON ST EAST BOUNDARY HALLECK ST A ST AC/AC 2 1,848 52 96,096 12/9/2020 100

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 6/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Street Name

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

FHA602 20 MASON ST HALLECK ST MCDOWELL AVE A ST AC 2 3,850 38 146,300 12/9/2020 66

FHA602 30 MASON ST MCDOWELL AVE END PARKING LOT A ST AC 2 1,225 40 49,000 12/9/2020 76

FHA657 10 MCDOWELL AVE Lincoln Blvd Cowles St C ST AC 2 748 32 23,936 12/14/2020 28

FHA657 20 MCDOWELL AVE Cowles St Mason St C ST AC 2 807 32 25,824 12/10/2020 90

FHA672 10 MCRAE ST PORTOLA ST SOUTH PORTOLA ST NORTH R ST AC 1 686 12 14,049 12/7/2020 44

FHA447 20 MESA ST LINCOLN BLVD CANBY ST R ST AC/AC 2 538 34 18,292 12/7/2020 60

FHA447 30 MESA ST CANBY ST MORAGA AVE R ST AC/AC 2 1,046 37 70,901 12/7/2020 67

FHA443 10 MONTGOMERY ST MORAGA AVE LINCOLN BLVD C ST AC/AC 2 1,478 26 38,428 12/7/2020 83

FHA449 10 MORAGA AVE FUNSTON AVE INFANTRY TERRACE C ST AC 2 1,267 28 35,476 12/7/2020 69

FHA674 10 MORTON ST RODRIQUEZ ST LIGGETT AVE R ST AC 2 739 18 13,302 12/7/2020 49

FHA630 10 N 15TH AVE SOUTH BOUNDARY WEDEMEYER ST C ST AC/AC 2 317 22 6,974 12/11/2020 95

FHA665 10 NAUMAN RD WASHINGTON BLVD END R ST AC/AC 1 1,214 12 14,568 12/10/2020 93

FHA613 10 ORD ST RILEY AVE SHERIDAN AVE R ST AC 2 475 18 8,550 12/14/2020 26

FHA614 10 OREILLY AVE TORNEY AVE EDIE RD R ST AC 1 581 16 9,296 12/8/2020 56

FHA614 20 OREILLY AVE EDIE ROAD GORGAS AVE C ST AC 2 155 21 3,255 12/8/2020 95

FHA6145 10 OWEN ST GRAHAM ST ANZA ST R ST AC 2 142 26 3,692 12/9/2020 75

909aP P1 PALACE OF FINE ART PARKING PALACE DRIVE PALACE DRIVE O P AC 1 2,033 40 81,350 12/8/2020 82 

FHA011 30 PARK BLVD WASHINGTON BLVD LINCOLN BLVD C ST AC 2 2,695 39 105,105 12/14/2020 73

FHA011 10 PARK TR 14TH AVE ENT W. PACIFIC AVE O TR AC 2 1,320 22 30,360 1/16/2021 43

FHA011 20 PARK TR W. PACIFIC AVE WASHINGTON BLVD O TR PCC 2 1,795 20 35,900 1/16/2021 66

FHA707 10 PARK TRAIL SPUR 14TH AVE PARK TRAIL O TR AC 2 250 10 2,500 12/11/2020 67

FHA702 10 PATH O'REILLY AVE GENERAL KENNEDY PARKING O TR AC 2 300 10 3,000 12/17/2020 95

FHA656 10 PATTEN ST MCDOWELL AVE LINCOLN BLVD O TR AC 2 792 16 12,672 12/16/2020 95

FHA709 10 PAUL GOOD FIELD ACCESS PORTOLA ST TRAIL O TR AC 2 150 12 1,800 12/17/2020 97

FHA689 10 PENA ST MESA ST KEYES AVE R ST AC 2 211 18 3,798 12/8/2020 65

FHA624 10 PERSHING DR LINCOLN BLVD SOUTH LINCOLN BLVD NORTH R ST AC 2 2,733 32 87,440 12/15/2020 57

FHA615 20 PIPER LOOP DEEMS RD DUDLEY RD R ST AC/AC 2 550 16 17,744 12/10/2020 87

FHA615 30 PIPER LOOP DUDLEY RD END R ST AC/AC 2 559 20 11,180 12/10/2020 85

FHA017 10 PORTOLA ST MACARTHUR AVE END R ST AC 2 1,795 26 48,465 12/7/2020 74

FHA015 10 PRESIDIO BLVD SOUTH ENTRANCE LOMBARD ST A ST AC 2 2,733 32 157,120 12/17/2020 69

FHA015 15 PRESIDIO BLVD LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR A ST AC/AC 2 660 33 21,780 12/17/2020 64

FHA015 25 PRESIDIO BLVD LETTERMAN DR MESA ST A ST AC 2 1,436 33 47,388 12/7/2020 64

FHA700 10 PRESIDIO PROMENADE LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR O TR AC 2 1,300 9 11,700 1/16/2021 63

FHA700 20 PRESIDIO PROMENADE LETTERMAN DR LETTERMAN DR O TR AC 2 320 9 2,880 1/16/2021 55

FHA700 30 PRESIDIO PROMENADE LETTERMAN DR TORNEY AVE O TR PCC 2 280 9 2,520 1/16/2021 98

FHA700 40 PRESIDIO PROMENADE LINCOLN BLVD LINCOLN BLVD O TR AC 2 1,310 13 17,030 1/16/2021 95

FHA700 60 PRESIDIO PROMENADE MCDOWELL AVE LONG AVE O TR AC 2 2,170 10 21,700 1/16/2021 95

FHA434 10 QUARRY RD FERNANDEZ ST END OF PAVEMENT R ST AC 2 1,109 25 45,840 12/7/2020 66

FHA627 10 RALSTON AVE STOREY AVE LINCOLN BLVD C ST AC 2 3,168 25 81,626 12/11/2020 47

903bP 10 RAMSEL CT ARMISTEAD RD END R ST AC 2 392 22 19,271 12/16/2020 55

FHA687 10 RAWLES ST SIMONDS LOOP SHAFTER RD R ST AC 1 159 18 2,862 12/9/2020 8

FHA616 10 RILEY AVE SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD R ST AC 1 422 18 7,596 12/14/2020 84

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 7/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Street Name

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

FHA705 10 ROB HILL CAMPGROUND PATH CENTRAL MAGAZINE END O TR AC 2 1,055 12 12,660 12/16/2020 95 

FHA617 10 ROD RD STOREY AVE NORTH STOREY AVE SOUTH R ST AC 1 422 16 9,268 12/14/2020 85

FHA673 10 RODRIGUEZ ST PORTOLA ST SOUTH PORTOLA ST NORTH R ST AC 1 1,267 18 23,885 12/7/2020 72

FHA642 10 RUCKMAN AVE RALSTON AVE UPTON C ST AC 2 200 24 4,800 12/14/2020 42

FHA642 20 RUCKMAN AVE UPTON STOREY C ST AC/AC 2 645 24 15,480 12/14/2020 95

FHA685 10 RUGER ST SIMONDS LOOP LOMBARD ST R ST AC 2 1,395 29 41,884 12/7/2020 74

900sP 10 SAL ST GRAHAM ST KEYES AVE R ST AC 2 124 29 3,596 12/8/2020 43

FHA681 10 SANCHES ST MORTON ST PARKING R ST AC 2 422 22 22,900 12/7/2020 59

FHA682 10 SHAFTER RD WEST END EAST END O TR AC 1 1,027 14 14,378 12/12/2020 59

FHA437 10 SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD RILEY AVE C ST AC 2 315 31 9,765 12/10/2020 58

FHA437 20 SHERIDAN AVE RILEY AVE GRAHAM ST C ST AC 2 963 31 29,853 12/10/2020 17

FHA686 10 SHERMAN RD PRESIDIO BLVD RUGER ST R ST AC 2 1,003 16 20,745 12/17/2020 25

FHA670 10 SIBERT LOOP THOMAS AVE WEST THOMAS AVE EAST R ST AC 1 898 10 8,980 12/10/2020 58

FHA676 10 SIBLEY RD LIGGETT AVE LOOP MORTON ST R ST AC 1 1,267 11 13,937 12/7/2020 50

902mP P1 SIBLEY ROAD PARKING RTE 676 SIBLEY RD BLDG 790-791 O P AC 1 117 40 4,673 12/7/2020 69

FHA679 10 SIMONDS LOOP PRESIDIO BLVD SOUTH PRESIDIO BLVD NORTH R ST AC 2 2,693 26 79,048 12/7/2020 68

FHA625 10 STILLWELL RD LINCOLN BLVD PERSHING DR R ST AC 2 950 32 30,400 12/15/2020 38

903gP 10 STONE ST LINCOLN BLVD STOREY AVE R ST AC 2 227 19 4,313 12/16/2020 57

903gP P1 STONE ST PARKING RTE 010 LINCOLN AVE RTE 628 STOREY ST O P AC 1 314 40 12,566 12/14/2020 59

FHA628 10 STOREY AVE LINCOLN BLVD WEST RALSTON EAST C ST AC/AC 2 845 23 19,435 12/14/2020 95

FHA628 20 STOREY AVE RALSTON EAST RUCKMAN C ST AC 2 845 23 19,435 12/14/2020 53

FHA628 30 STOREY AVE RUCKMAN LINCOLN BLVD EAST C ST AC/AC 2 844 23 19,412 12/14/2020 95

FHA680 10 SUMNER AVE PRESIDIO BLVD MACARTHUR AVE R ST AC 1 1,584 16 25,344 12/9/2020 48

FHA442 10 TAYLOR RD LINCOLN BLVD BLISS RD R ST AC 2 1,162 18 20,916 12/14/2020 81

900hP P1 TAYLOR ROAD PARKING RTE 442, TAYLOR RD BLDG 116 O P AC 2 992 40 39,685 12/14/2020 79

900sP P1 THE PRESIDIO PARKING RTE 445 GRAHAM ST RTE 449 MORAGA AVE O P AC 2 2,606 40 104,263 12/8/2020 35

FHA669 10 THOMAS AVE INFANTRY TERRACE ARGUELLO BLVD R ST AC 1 1,373 14 19,222 12/10/2020 75

FHA459 10 THORNBURG RD THORNBURG PARKING GENERAL KENNEDY AVE R ST AC 2 475 31 14,725 12/8/2020 53

FHA457 10 TORNEY AVE LINCOLN BLVD OREILLY AVE R ST AC 1 528 16 13,666 12/8/2020 59

901faP P1 TORNEY PARKING RTE 457 TORNEY AVE RTE 010 LINCOLN BLVD O P AC 2 252 40 10,069 12/8/2020 53

FHA620 10 UPTON AVE HITCHCOCK ST RALSTON AVE C ST AC 2 581 20 11,620 12/11/2020 39

FHA620 20 UPTON AVE RALSTON AVE STOREY AVE C ST AC 2 1,478 45 66,510 12/11/2020 46

902lP P1 VISTA COURT PARKING RTE 678 VISTA CT BLDG 787-789 O P AC 1 158 40 6,327 12/7/2020 40

FHA678 10 VISTA CT LIGGETT AVE END R ST AC 2 264 22 5,808 12/7/2020 52

FHA671 10 WALLEN ST MACARTHUR AVE END R ST AC 2 264 20 10,769 12/7/2020 73

FHA012 10 WASHINGTON BLVD LINCOLN BLVD KOBBE AVE C ST AC 2 480 32 15,360 12/10/2020 95

FHA012 20 WASHINGTON BLVD KOBBE AVE IMMIGRANT POINT C ST AC 2 1,290 30 38,700 12/10/2020 64

FHA012 31 WASHINGTON BLVD IMMIGRANT POINT OVERLOOK WEST COMPTON C ST AC 2 890 30 26,700 12/10/2020 73 

FHA012 40 WASHINGTON BLVD WEST COMPTON EAST COMPTON C ST AC/AC 2 1,300 30 39,000 12/10/2020 89

FHA012 51 WASHINGTON BLVD EAST COMPTON PARK BLVD. C ST AC 2 930 30 27,900 12/10/2020 69

FHA012 60 WASHINGTON BLVD PARK BLVD. BLDG. 401 C ST AC 2 400 30 12,000 12/10/2020 58

FHA012 70 WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG. 401 DEEMS C ST AC 2 1,820 30 54,600 12/10/2020 44

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 8/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Street Name

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

FHA012 80 WASHINGTON BLVD DEEMS ARGUELLO C ST AC 2 970 32 31,040 12/10/2020 57

907acP P1 WEDEMEYER PARKING RTE 428 WEDEMEYER ST END O P AC 1 988 35 34,580 1/16/2021 91

FHA426 10 WEDEMEYER STREET S. 14TH AVE ENTRANCE BATTERY CAULFIELD RD C ST AC 2 1,795 20 35,900 12/11/2020 85

FHA014 010 WEST PACIFIC AVE PARK BLVD GATE O TR AC 2 3,260 24 78,240 12/10/2020 65

FHA014 020 WEST PACIFIC AVE GATE ARGEULLO BLVD C ST AC 2 1,305 24 31,320 12/10/2020 52

FHA014 030 WEST PACIFIC AVE ARGUELLO BLVD PRESIDIO BLVD C ST AC 2 3,512 24 84,290 12/9/2020 63

903xP 10 WISSER CT UPTON AVE END R ST GRAVEL 1 432 13 10,565 NA NA

903rP 10 WOOL CT UPTON AVE END R ST AC 2 279 31 14,283 12/11/2020 52

FHA621 10 WRIGHT LOOP HITCHCOCK ST END OF LOOP R ST AC 1 1,320 15 22,311 12/11/2020 57

FHA632 10 WYMAN AVE WEDEMEYER ST END R ST PCC 2 1,003 19 19,057 12/11/2020 29

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 9/9
 Section Description Inventory – Sorted by Descending PCI 

 
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Descending PCI

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

900zP P1 ANZA PARKING ANZA AVE MIDDLE ANZA AVE NORTH O P AC 1 342 108 36,936 1/16/2021 100

900gP P1 BUILDING 210 PARKING LINCOLN BLVD

 BLDG 210 (POST 

OFFICE/VISITOR'S CENTER) O P AC 1 353 40 14,105 1/16/2021 100 

900eP P1 BUILDING 222-229 PARKING RTE 452 HALLECK ST BLDG 222-228 O P AC/AC 2 710 40 28,400 1/16/2021 100

FHA640 10 AMATURY LOOP PARK BLVD SOUTH PARK BLVD NORTH R ST AC/AC 2 1,267 22 45,696 12/31/2020 100

PT702 10 BATTERY CAULFIELD 

CONNECTOR RD PERSHING DR. BATTERY CAULFIELD RD. C ST AC 1 300 11 3,150 12/16/2020 100 

FHA445 20 GRAHAM ST FRENCH COURT LINCOLN BLVD C ST AC 2 381 38 14,478 12/16/2020 100

FHA602 10 MASON ST EAST BOUNDARY HALLECK ST A ST AC/AC 2 1,848 52 96,096 12/9/2020 100

906xtP P1 BUILDING 1501 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1501 O P AC 1 127 16 2,045 12/15/2020 99

906xsP P1 BUILDING 1502 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1502 O P AC 1 117 16 1,887 12/15/2020 99

906xrP P1 BUILDING 1503-7 ODD 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1503-1507 O P AC 1 627 16 10,035 12/15/2020 99 

906xqP P1 BUILDING 1504 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1504 O P AC 1 156 16 2,501 12/15/2020 99

906xkP P1 BUILDING 1510-14 EVEN 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1510-1514 O P AC 1 392 16 6,272 12/15/2020 99 

906ygP P1 BUILDING 

1516/1578/1580PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1516/1578/1580 O P AC 1 467 15 7,007 12/15/2020 99 

906xiP P1 BUILDING 1517/1519 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1517-1519 O P AC 1 279 16 4,472 12/15/2020 99 

906xgP P1 BUILDING 1518/1580 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1518/1580 O P AC 1 190 16 3,050 12/15/2020 99 

906xeP P1 BUILDING 1520 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1520 O P AC 1 274 16 4,398 12/15/2020 99

906xfP P1 BUILDING 1525 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1525 O P AC 1 107 16 1,726 12/15/2020 99

906cjP P1 BUILDING 

1528/1545/1547PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1547 O P AC 1 487 15 7,317 12/15/2020 99 

906chP P1 BUILDING 1530-44 EVEN 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1534/1542/1544 O P AC 1 913 15 13,703 12/15/2020 99 

906xbP P1 BUILDING 1533 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1533 O P AC 1 151 16 2,431 12/15/2020 99

906xaP P1 BUILDING 1535-43 ODD 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1535-1543 O P AC 1 896 16 14,342 12/15/2020 99 

906cfP P1 BUILDING 1546-50 EVEN 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1548 O P AC 1 309 15 4,640 12/15/2020 99 

906ciP P1 BUILDING 1549 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1551 O P AC 1 245 15 3,678 12/15/2020 99

906cdP P1 BUILDING 1552-58 EVEN 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1552-1558 O P AC 1 333 15 5,003 12/15/2020 99 

906cgP P1 BUILDING 1555-59 ODD 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1555 O P AC 1 299 15 4,990 12/15/2020 99 

906ccP P1 BUILDING 1567-73 ODD 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1567-1573 O P AC 1 416 15 6,243 12/15/2020 99 

906ceP P1 BUILDING 1582/84/61/63/65 

PARK

STILLWELL RD PERSHING DR O P AC 1 865 15 12,978 12/15/2020 99 

906yeP P1 BUILDING 1583/1585 PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1583/1585 O P AC 1 257 15 3,861 12/15/2020 99 

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 1/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Descending PCI

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

906yfP P1 BUILDING 1586 PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1586 O P AC 1 106 15 1,594 12/15/2020 99

906ycP P1 BUILDING 1587/1589 PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1587/1589 O P AC 1 314 15 4,717 12/15/2020 99 

906ydP P1 BUILDING 1588/1590 PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1588/1590 O P AC 1 408 15 6,120 12/15/2020 99 

906ybP P1 BUILDING 1592/1594 PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1592/1594 O P AC 1 183 15 2,748 12/15/2020 99 

900xP P1 BUILDING 36/37 PARKING RTE 445 GRAHAM ST BLDG 36 O P AC/AC 2 430 40 17,213 12/9/2020 99

901vP P1 BUILDING 1029 PARKING RTE 458 GIRARD RD BLDG 1029 O P AC 1 2,028 40 81,131 12/17/2020 98

906xnP P1 BUILDING 1506/1508 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1506-1508 O P AC 1 244 16 3,910 12/15/2020 98 

FHA700 30 PRESIDIO PROMENADE LETTERMAN DR TORNEY AVE O TR PCC 2 280 9 2,520 1/16/2021 98

FHA652 10 HOFFMAN ST ARMISTEAD RD LINCOLN BLVD R ST AC/AC 2 1,109 24 26,616 12/16/2020 97

FHA709 10 PAUL GOOD FIELD ACCESS PORTOLA ST TRAIL O TR AC 2 150 12 1,800 12/17/2020 97

901qP P1 BUILDING 1163/67/69/70 

PARKING RTE 455 GORGAS AVE BLDGS 1167-1170 O P AC 2 1,552 40 62,071 12/8/2020 96 

901sP P1 BUILDING 1062 PARKING RTE 459 THORNBURG RD BIRMINGHAM RD O P AC 1 262 40 10,469 12/8/2020 95

901pP P1 BUILDING 1160 PARKING RTE 455 GORGAS AVE BLDG 1160 O P AC 2 127 40 5,098 12/8/2020 95

903qaP P1 BUILDING 1331 PARKING

RTE 623 KOBBE AVE 

NORTHSIDE TENNIS OVERLOOK 1331 O P AC 1 467 40 18,695 12/10/2020 95 

906xcP P1 BUILDING 1524/1526 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1524-1526 O P AC 1 226 16 3,620 12/15/2020 95 

906yaP P1 BUILDING 1591 PARKING STILLWELL RD BLDG 1591 O P AC 1 311 15 4,672 12/15/2020 95

907aaP P1 BUILDING 1801 PARKING WEDEMEYER ST BLDG 1801 O P AC 1 1,611 24 38,664 12/11/2020 95

907dP P1 BUILDING 1808 NORTH 

PARKING RTE 428 WEDEMEYER ST END (N/O BLDG 1808) O P AC 1 186 60 11,160 12/11/2020 95 

907cP P1 BUILDING 1818/1819 PARKING RTE 428 WEDEMEYER ST BLDG 1818 O P AC 1 309 17 5,256 12/11/2020 95 

FHA626 20 BAKER CT BROOK ST END PARKING R ST AC/AC 2 241 40 16,243 12/16/2020 95

FHA626 10 BROOKS ST LINCOLN BLVD END PARKING R ST AC/AC 2 724 40 37,031 12/16/2020 95

45 10 GIRARD RD LINCOLN BLVD EDIE RD A ST AC 2 581 45 26,145 12/8/2020 95

FHA631 10 HAYS ST WEDEMEYER ST BROWN ST R ST AC 1 572 17 9,724 12/11/2020 95

FHA010 80 LINCOLN BLVD MONTGOMERY ST PRESIDIO BLVD A ST AC 2 1,900 40 76,000 12/14/2020 95

FHA630 10 N 15TH AVE SOUTH BOUNDARY WEDEMEYER ST C ST AC/AC 2 317 22 6,974 12/11/2020 95

FHA614 20 OREILLY AVE EDIE ROAD GORGAS AVE C ST AC 2 155 21 3,255 12/8/2020 95

FHA642 20 RUCKMAN AVE UPTON STOREY C ST AC/AC 2 645 24 15,480 12/14/2020 95

FHA628 10 STOREY AVE LINCOLN BLVD WEST RALSTON EAST C ST AC/AC 2 845 23 19,435 12/14/2020 95

FHA628 30 STOREY AVE RUCKMAN LINCOLN BLVD EAST C ST AC/AC 2 844 23 19,412 12/14/2020 95

FHA012 10 WASHINGTON BLVD LINCOLN BLVD KOBBE AVE C ST AC 2 480 32 15,360 12/10/2020 95

FHA455 30 GORGAS TR GORGAS AVE LYON ST O TR AC 2 130 12 1,560 12/8/2020 95

FHA702 10 PATH O'REILLY AVE GENERAL KENNEDY PARKING O TR AC 2 300 10 3,000 12/17/2020 95

FHA656 10 PATTEN ST MCDOWELL AVE LINCOLN BLVD O TR AC 2 792 16 12,672 12/16/2020 95

FHA700 40 PRESIDIO PROMENADE LINCOLN BLVD LINCOLN BLVD O TR AC 2 1,310 13 17,030 1/16/2021 95

FHA700 60 PRESIDIO PROMENADE MCDOWELL AVE LONG AVE O TR AC 2 2,170 10 21,700 1/16/2021 95

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 2/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Descending PCI

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

FHA705 10 ROB HILL CAMPGROUND PATH CENTRAL MAGAZINE END O TR AC 2 1,055 12 12,660 12/16/2020 95 

900uP P1 HARDIE AVE PARKING FUNSTON AVE BLDG 50 O P AC 1 562 40 22,484 1/16/2021 94

907abP P2 BUILDING 1808 SOUTH 

PARKING RTE 428 WEDEMEYER ST BLDG 1808 O P AC 2 771 40 30,843 12/11/2020 93 

FHA634 10 BROWN ST WYMAN AVE HAYS ST R ST AC 1 219 18 3,942 12/11/2020 93

FHA665 10 NAUMAN RD WASHINGTON BLVD END R ST AC/AC 1 1,214 12 14,568 12/10/2020 93

901iP P1 BUILDING 1027 PARKING RTE 607 EDIE RD BLDG 1027 O P AC 2 91 40 3,633 12/8/2020 91

907acP P1 WEDEMEYER PARKING RTE 428 WEDEMEYER ST END O P AC 1 988 35 34,580 1/16/2021 91

FHA633 10 BELLES ST WYMAN AVE HAYS ST R ST PCC 1 461 20 9,220 12/11/2020 91

FHA634 20 BROWN ST HAYS ST BELLES ST R ST PCC 1 390 17 6,630 12/11/2020 91

901lP P1 GENERAL KENNEDY PARKING GENERAL KENNEDY AVE O'REILLY AVE O P AC 1 107 100 10,700 12/8/2020 90

FHA013 10 ARGUELLO BLVD SOUTH PARK ENTRANCE WASHINGTON BLVD A ST AC/AC 2 1,160 46 53,360 12/7/2020 90

FHA657 20 MCDOWELL AVE Cowles St Mason St C ST AC 2 807 32 25,824 12/10/2020 90

906xpP P1 BUILDING 1509 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1509 O P AC 1 140 16 2,249 12/15/2020 89

FHA010 30 LINCOLN BLVD KOBBE AVE MERCHANT/STOREY A ST AC/AC 2 2,335 32 74,720 12/16/2020 89

FHA010 60 LINCOLN BLVD PATTEN SHERIDAN AV A ST AC 2 1,060 26 27,560 12/16/2020 89

FHA012 40 WASHINGTON BLVD WEST COMPTON EAST COMPTON C ST AC/AC 2 1,300 30 39,000 12/10/2020 89

900pP P1 BUILDING 130 PARKING RTE 441 FISHER LOOP BLDG 130 O P AC 2 586 40 23,442 12/14/2020 87

900mP P1 FITNESS PARKING RTE 015 PRESIDIO BLVD END O P AC 1 315 60 18,900 12/17/2020 87

FHA603 10 BATTERY CAULFIELD RD WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG 1450 C ST AC/AC 2 412 24 9,888 1/27/2021 87

FHA615 20 PIPER LOOP DEEMS RD DUDLEY RD R ST AC/AC 2 550 16 17,744 12/10/2020 87

FHA456 20 GIRARD RD EDIE RD GORGAS AVE A ST AC 2 454 28 12,712 12/8/2020 86

FHA455 20 GORGAS AVE KENDALL DR GIRARD RD C ST AC 2 302 50 15,100 12/8/2020 86

909bP P1 BUILDING 1188 PARKING RTE 464 LUNDEEN ST EAST BOUNDARY O P AC 2 302 40 12,081 12/8/2020 85

906ecP P1 BUILDING 1449/1450 PARKING RTE 603 BATTERY CAULFIELD BLDG 1449 O P AC 1 44 30 1,330 12/10/2020 85 

908cP P1 BUILDING 1770-1781 PARKING RTE 684 GIBSON RD BLDG 1781 O P AC 1 862 29 25,019 12/16/2020 85 

900kbP P1 BUILDING 38 PARKING MESA ST BUILDING 38 O P AC 1 205 25 5,125 1/16/2021 85

900tP P1 BUILDING 50 PARKING RTE 013 ARGUELLO BLVD BLDG 50 O P AC 2 52 50 2,600 1/16/2021 85

909kP P1 BUILDING 924/926 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 924/926 O P AC 1 183 60 11,005 12/9/2020 85

909dP P1 BUILDING 937 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 937 O P AC 1 80 50 4,000 12/9/2020 85

901bP P1 LOMBARD ST PULL-OUT 

PARKING RTE 438 LOMBARD ST EAST ENTRANCE O P AC 2 69 40 2,756 12/8/2020 85 

FHA636 10 HARRISON BLVD WASHINGTON BLVD KOBBE AVE R ST AC/AC 2 581 24 13,944 12/10/2020 85

FHA010 47 LINCOLN BLVD 101 OVERPASS STOREY AVE A ST AC 2 718 32 22,976 12/16/2020 85

FHA615 30 PIPER LOOP DUDLEY RD END R ST AC/AC 2 559 20 11,180 12/10/2020 85

FHA617 10 ROD RD STOREY AVE NORTH STOREY AVE SOUTH R ST AC 1 422 16 9,268 12/14/2020 85

FHA426 10 WEDEMEYER STREET S. 14TH AVE ENTRANCE BATTERY CAULFIELD RD C ST AC 2 1,795 20 35,900 12/11/2020 85

FHA708 10 ANZA TRAIL SPUR WEDEMEYER AVE WEDEMEYER PARKING O TR AC 2 80 6 480 12/11/2020 85

FHA708 20 ANZA TRAIL SPUR WEDEMEYER AVE WEDEMEYER PARKING O TR AC 2 200 6 1,200 12/11/2020 85

FHA616 10 RILEY AVE SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD R ST AC 1 422 18 7,596 12/14/2020 84

FHA443 10 MONTGOMERY ST MORAGA AVE LINCOLN BLVD C ST AC/AC 2 1,478 26 38,428 12/7/2020 83

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 3/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Descending PCI

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

900bP P1 BUILDING 610 EAST PARKING RTE 602 MASON ST BLDG 610 O P AC 1 500 210 105,000 12/9/2020 82

900wP P1 BUILDING 67 PARKING RTE 454 MARTINEZ AVE BLDG 67 O P AC 2 215 40 8,600 12/17/2020 82

909aP P1 PALACE OF FINE ART PARKING PALACE DRIVE PALACE DRIVE O P AC 1 2,033 40 81,350 12/8/2020 82 

900aP P1 BUILDING 610 WEST PARKING RTE 602 MASON ST BLDG 610 O P AC 2 1,074 41 44,034 12/9/2020 81 

FHA677 10 CLARK ST LIGGETT AVE LOOP LIGGETT AVE R ST AC 1 845 15 12,675 12/17/2020 81

FHA446 30 KEYES AVE PENA ST CANBY ST R ST AC 2 782 26 34,320 12/8/2020 81

FHA442 10 TAYLOR RD LINCOLN BLVD BLISS RD R ST AC 2 1,162 18 20,916 12/14/2020 81

906caP P1 BUILDING 1575/1577 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1575-1577 O P AC 1 331 15 4,969 12/15/2020 80 

FHA458 30 GEN KENNEDY AVE EDIE ROAD BIRMINGHAM PARKING R ST AC/AC 2 200 34 6,800 12/8/2020 80

900hP P1 TAYLOR ROAD PARKING RTE 442, TAYLOR RD BLDG 116 O P AC 2 992 40 39,685 12/14/2020 79

FHA675 10 LIGGETT AVE PRESIDIO BLVD END OF LOOP R ST AC 2 1,637 20 32,740 12/7/2020 79

FHA703 10 ANZA TRAIL 14TH AVE WEDEMEYER ST O TR AC 2 1,200 8 9,600 12/11/2020 79

901hP P1 BUILDING 1028 SERVICE RTE 458 GIRARD RD BLDG 1028 O P AC 1 516 16 8,255 12/8/2020 78

909mP P1 BUILDING 1183-85 PARKING EAST OF MARSHALL BLDG 1184 AND 1185 O P AC 1 2,014 40 80,550 12/9/2020 78

906kP P1 BUILDING 300 PARKING ARGUELLO END O P AC 1 1,916 24 45,984 1/16/2021 78

FHA010 46 LINCOLN BLVD LENDRUM CT 101 OVERPASS A ST AC 2 710 32 22,720 12/10/2020 78

FHA013 30 ARGUELLO BLVD WASHINGTON BLVD MORAGA AVE A ST AC 2 2,048 28 68,544 12/7/2020 77

FHA458 20 GEN KENNEDY AVE TORNEY AVE EDIE ROAD R ST AC 2 592 34 20,128 12/8/2020 77

FHA638 10 HITCHCOCK ST PARK BLVD HARRISON BLVD R ST AC 2 2,640 18 49,028 12/11/2020 77

FHA016 10 MACARTHUR AVE PRESIDIO BLVD EL POLIN LOOP C ST AC 2 2,323 27 66,986 12/7/2020 77

906xjP P1 BUILDING 1515 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1515 O P AC 1 106 16 1,702 12/15/2020 76

902jP P1 BUILDING 808/809 PARKING RTE 451 FERNANDEZ ST BLDG 808 O P AC 2 93 40 3,708 12/7/2020 76

FHA454 10 MARTINEZ ST FUNSTON AVE PRESIDIO BLVD R ST AC 1 686 12 8,232 12/7/2020 76

FHA602 30 MASON ST MCDOWELL AVE END PARKING LOT A ST AC 2 1,225 40 49,000 12/9/2020 76

906xmP P1 BUILDING 1511 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1511 O P AC 1 273 16 4,370 12/15/2020 75

900jP P1 BUILDING 87 PARKING RTE 445 GRAHAM ST BLDG 85-87 O P AC 2 210 40 8,400 1/16/2021 75

FHA6145 10 OWEN ST GRAHAM ST ANZA ST R ST AC 2 142 26 3,692 12/9/2020 75

FHA669 10 THOMAS AVE INFANTRY TERRACE ARGUELLO BLVD R ST AC 1 1,373 14 19,222 12/10/2020 75

910bP P1 INSPIRATION POINT RTE 013 ARGUELLO BLVD INSPIRATION POINT O P AC 2 532 40 21,290 12/10/2020 74

FHA448 10 FUNSTON AVE - FUNSTON MORAGA AVE LINCOLN BLVD C ST AC 2 1,637 32 52,384 12/7/2020 74

FHA668 20 INFANTRY TERRACE MORAGA ARGUELLO C ST AC 2 2,146 23 49,358 12/7/2020 74

FHA017 10 PORTOLA ST MACARTHUR AVE END R ST AC 2 1,795 26 48,465 12/7/2020 74

FHA685 10 RUGER ST SIMONDS LOOP LOMBARD ST R ST AC 2 1,395 29 41,884 12/7/2020 74

901gP P1 BUILDING 1028 PARKING RTE 607 EDIE RD BLDG 1028 O P AC 2 1,696 40 67,835 12/8/2020 73

902ibP P1 BUILDING 779 PARKING RTE 674 MORTON ST BLDG 779 O P AC 1 63 40 2,508 12/7/2020 73

902aP 10 GIBBON CT SIMONDS LOOP END R ST AC 1 314 17 5,202 12/9/2020 73

FHA011 30 PARK BLVD WASHINGTON BLVD LINCOLN BLVD C ST AC 2 2,695 39 105,105 12/14/2020 73

FHA671 10 WALLEN ST MACARTHUR AVE END R ST AC 2 264 20 10,769 12/7/2020 73

FHA012 31 WASHINGTON BLVD IMMIGRANT POINT OVERLOOK WEST COMPTON C ST AC 2 890 30 26,700 12/10/2020 73 

900yP P1 BUILDING 218 PARKING GRAHAM ST BLDG 218 O P AC 1 96 65 6,240 1/16/2021 72

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 4/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Descending PCI

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

FHA441 10 FISHER LOOP SHERIDAN AVE END OF LOOP R ST AC 2 1,923 20 38,478 12/14/2020 72

FHA673 10 RODRIGUEZ ST PORTOLA ST SOUTH PORTOLA ST NORTH R ST AC 1 1,267 18 23,885 12/7/2020 72

FHA460 10 KENDALL DR EDIE RD GORGAS AVE R ST AC 2 370 20 7,400 12/17/2020 71

901kP P1 BUILDING 1016 PARKING LINCOLN BLVD NORTH TORNEY AVE O P AC 1 260 16 4,160 1/16/2021 70

900oP P2 BUILDING 135 WEST PARKING RTE 441 FISHER LOOP BLDG 135 O P AC 1 431 40 17,260 12/14/2020 70 

901dP P1 BUILDING 558 PARKING RTE 015 PRESIDIO BLVD BLDG 558 O P AC 1 250 40 10,000 12/9/2020 70

PT701 10 BATTERY SAFFOLD RD KOBBE AVE. BLDG 1351 R ST AC 1 265 14 3,710 12/16/2020 70

902iaP P1 BUILDING 777 PARKING RTE 674 MORTON ST BLDG 777 O P AC 2 132 40 5,291 12/7/2020 69

902mP P1 SIBLEY ROAD PARKING RTE 676 SIBLEY RD BLDG 790-791 O P AC 1 117 40 4,673 12/7/2020 69

FHA449 10 MORAGA AVE FUNSTON AVE INFANTRY TERRACE C ST AC 2 1,267 28 35,476 12/7/2020 69

FHA015 10 PRESIDIO BLVD SOUTH ENTRANCE LOMBARD ST A ST AC 2 2,733 32 157,120 12/17/2020 69

FHA012 51 WASHINGTON BLVD EAST COMPTON PARK BLVD. C ST AC 2 930 30 27,900 12/10/2020 69

906xlP P1 BUILDING 1513 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1513 O P AC 1 211 16 3,387 12/15/2020 68

FHA690 10 BOWLEY ST LINCOLN BLVD NORTH LINVOLN BLVD SOUTH R ST AC 1 1,455 35 50,925 1/16/2021 68

FHA438 10 LOMBARD ST PRESIDIO BLVD LETTERMAN A ST AC/AC 2 689 32 22,048 12/10/2020 68

FHA679 10 SIMONDS LOOP PRESIDIO BLVD SOUTH PRESIDIO BLVD NORTH R ST AC 2 2,693 26 79,048 12/7/2020 68

901fcP P1 BUILDING 1013 PARKING RTE 457 TORNEY AVE BLDG 1013 O P AC 1 34 40 1,372 12/8/2020 67

906edP P1 BUILDING 1432 PARKING RTE 603 BATTERY CAULFIELD BLDG 1432 O P AC 1 224 40 8,973 12/10/2020 67

905aP P1 BUILDING 662 PARKING RTE 657 MCDOWELL AVE BLDG 661 O P AC 2 2,176 20 43,524 12/14/2020 67

FHA451 10 FERNANDEZ ST - FERNANDEZ BARNARD AVE MACARTHUR AVE R ST AC 2 370 19 7,030 12/7/2020 67

FHA623 10 KOBBE AVE LINCOLN BLVD PARK BLVD C ST AC 2 3,379 28 97,712 12/10/2020 67

FHA447 30 MESA ST CANBY ST MORAGA AVE R ST AC/AC 2 1,046 37 70,901 12/7/2020 67

FHA707 10 PARK TRAIL SPUR 14TH AVE PARK TRAIL O TR AC 2 250 10 2,500 12/11/2020 67

903vP P1 BUILDING 1340 PARKING RTE 623 KOBBE AVE BLDG 1340 O P AC 1 135 12 1,629 12/15/2020 66

906xhP P1 BUILDING 1521 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1521 O P AC 1 64 16 1,037 12/15/2020 66

900lP P1 BUILDING 63 PARKING RTE 448 FUNSTON AVE BLDG 63 O P AC 2 1,630 40 65,225 12/8/2020 66

FHA602 20 MASON ST HALLECK ST MCDOWELL AVE A ST AC 2 3,850 38 146,300 12/9/2020 66

FHA434 10 QUARRY RD FERNANDEZ ST END OF PAVEMENT R ST AC 2 1,109 25 45,840 12/7/2020 66

FHA011 20 PARK TR W. PACIFIC AVE WASHINGTON BLVD O TR PCC 2 1,795 20 35,900 1/16/2021 66

905bP P1 BUILDING 667/668 PARKING RTE 657 MCDOWELL AVE BLDG 667 O P AC 1 1,261 40 50,456 12/14/2020 65

FHA689 10 PENA ST MESA ST KEYES AVE R ST AC 2 211 18 3,798 12/8/2020 65

FHA014 010 WEST PACIFIC AVE PARK BLVD GATE O TR AC 2 3,260 24 78,240 12/10/2020 65

900oP P1 BUILDING 135 PARKING RTE 441 FISHER LOOP BLDG 135 O P AC 1 385 24 9,240 1/16/2021 64

FHA446 20 KEYES AVE CANBY ST LINCOLN BLVD R ST AC/AC 2 538 26 34,320 12/8/2020 64

FHA015 15 PRESIDIO BLVD LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR A ST AC/AC 2 660 33 21,780 12/17/2020 64

FHA015 25 PRESIDIO BLVD LETTERMAN DR MESA ST A ST AC 2 1,436 33 47,388 12/7/2020 64

FHA012 20 WASHINGTON BLVD KOBBE AVE IMMIGRANT POINT C ST AC 2 1,290 30 38,700 12/10/2020 64

FHA688 10 BLISS RD INFANTRY TERRACE MONTGOMERY ST R ST AC 2 317 30 9,510 12/7/2020 63

FHA014 030 WEST PACIFIC AVE ARGUELLO BLVD PRESIDIO BLVD C ST AC 2 3,512 24 84,290 12/9/2020 63

FHA700 10 PRESIDIO PROMENADE LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR O TR AC 2 1,300 9 11,700 1/16/2021 63

903wP P1 LOT D PARKING LINCOLN RALSTON AND BLDG 1369 O P AC 1 400 135 54,000 1/16/2021 62

906jP 10 DUDLEY RD PIPER LOOP END R ST AC/AC 1 377 13 7,166 12/10/2020 62

906fcP P1 BUILDING 1414 PARKING RTE 012 WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG 1414 O P AC 1 60 40 2,415 12/10/2020 60

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 5/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Descending PCI

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

906faP P1 BUILDING 1418/1420 PARKING RTE 012 WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG 1418/1420 O P AC 1 70 40 2,812 12/10/2020 60 

FHA010 10 LINCOLN BLVD WEST ENTRANCE PERSHING DR SOUTH A ST AC 2 2,165 42 90,930 12/16/2020 60

FHA447 20 MESA ST LINCOLN BLVD CANBY ST R ST AC/AC 2 538 34 18,292 12/7/2020 60

902rP P1 GARDENER PARKING RUGER RUGER O P AC 1 770 22 16,940 12/7/2020 59

903gP P1 STONE ST PARKING RTE 010 LINCOLN AVE RTE 628 STOREY ST O P AC 1 314 40 12,566 12/14/2020 59

FHA629 10 COMPTON RD WASHINGTON BLVD WEST WASHINGTON BLVD EAST R ST AC 2 1,250 24 29,995 12/10/2020 59

FHA452 10 HALLECK ST LINCOLN BLVD FRENCH CT C ST AC 2 415 38 15,770 12/9/2020 59

FHA452 20 HALLECK ST FRENCH CT MASON ST C ST AC 2 730 38 27,740 12/9/2020 59

FHA668 10 INFANTRY TERRACE SHERIDAN AVE MORAGA C ST AC 2 600 23 13,800 12/7/2020 59

FHA681 10 SANCHES ST MORTON ST PARKING R ST AC 2 422 22 22,900 12/7/2020 59

FHA457 10 TORNEY AVE LINCOLN BLVD OREILLY AVE R ST AC 1 528 16 13,666 12/8/2020 59

FHA701 10 LOVERS' LANE PRESIDIO GATE PRESIDIO BLVD O TR AC 2 3,100 6 18,600 12/9/2020 59

FHA682 10 SHAFTER RD WEST END EAST END O TR AC 1 1,027 14 14,378 12/12/2020 59

900fP P1 BUILDING 211 PARKING RTE 452 HALLECK ST BLDG 211 O P AC 1 834 40 33,360 12/9/2020 58

FHA425 10 CENTRAL MAGAZINE RD WASHINGTON BLVD END R ST AC 2 634 24 15,216 12/10/2020 58

FHA010 20 LINCOLN BLVD PERSHING DR SOUTH KOBBE AV A ST AC 2 2,640 37 97,680 12/16/2020 58

FHA437 10 SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD RILEY AVE C ST AC 2 315 31 9,765 12/10/2020 58

FHA670 10 SIBERT LOOP THOMAS AVE WEST THOMAS AVE EAST R ST AC 1 898 10 8,980 12/10/2020 58

FHA012 60 WASHINGTON BLVD PARK BLVD. BLDG. 401 C ST AC 2 400 30 12,000 12/10/2020 58

901tP P1 BUILDING 1060 PARKING RTE 455 GORGAS AVE BLDG 1062 O P AC 1 731 40 29,258 12/8/2020 57

906xdP P1 BUILDING 1527/1529 PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1527-1529 O P AC 1 110 16 1,766 12/15/2020 57 

900rP P1 BUILDING 93 PARKING RTE 443 MONTGOMERY BLDG 93 O P AC 1 537 40 21,494 1/16/2021 57

FHA624 10 PERSHING DR LINCOLN BLVD SOUTH LINCOLN BLVD NORTH R ST AC 2 2,733 32 87,440 12/15/2020 57

903gP 10 STONE ST LINCOLN BLVD STOREY AVE R ST AC 2 227 19 4,313 12/16/2020 57

FHA012 80 WASHINGTON BLVD DEEMS ARGUELLO C ST AC 2 970 32 31,040 12/10/2020 57

FHA621 10 WRIGHT LOOP HITCHCOCK ST END OF LOOP R ST AC 1 1,320 15 22,311 12/11/2020 57

900vP P1 BUILDING 381-2 PARKING RTE 669 THOMAS AVE BLDG 381-382 O P AC 1 216 40 8,646 12/10/2020 56

902pbP P1 BUILDING 569/572 PARKING RTE 685 RUGER ST BLDG 569/572 O P AC 1 310 40 12,422 12/7/2020 56

901tN 10 BIRMINGHAM RD GEN KENNEDY AVE GORGAS AVE R ST AC 1 271 18 4,878 12/8/2020 56

FHA010 50 LINCOLN BLVD STOREY PATTEN A ST AC 2 1,760 28 49,280 12/16/2020 56

FHA614 10 OREILLY AVE TORNEY AVE EDIE RD R ST AC 1 581 16 9,296 12/8/2020 56

903hbP P1 BUILDING 1206/1207 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1206/1207 O P AC 1 80 40 3,224 12/11/2020 55 

909fP P1 BUILDING 649-51 PARKING MASSON ST BLDG 649-651 O P AC 1 565 40 22,580 12/9/2020 55

FHA605 10 CANBY ST KEYES ST MESA ST R ST AC/AC 2 158 24 3,792 12/8/2020 55

FHA010 42 LINCOLN BLVD GG BRIDGE PLAZA ENTRANCE LONG AVE A ST AC 2 1,080 38 41,040 12/16/2020 55

FHA010 43 LINCOLN BLVD LONG AVE LENDRUM CT A ST AC 2 470 38 17,860 12/16/2020 55

903bP 10 RAMSEL CT ARMISTEAD RD END R ST AC 2 392 22 19,271 12/16/2020 55

FHA700 20 PRESIDIO PROMENADE LETTERMAN DR LETTERMAN DR O TR AC 2 320 9 2,880 1/16/2021 55

900fP P2 BUILDING 220 PARKING RTE 452 HALLECK ST BLDG 220 O P AC 1 760 40 30,400 1/16/2021 54

909gP P1 BUILDING 644/649 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 644/649 O P PCC 1 301 60 18,072 12/9/2020 54

901faP P1 TORNEY PARKING RTE 457 TORNEY AVE RTE 010 LINCOLN BLVD O P AC 2 252 40 10,069 12/8/2020 53

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 6/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Descending PCI

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

FHA436 10 LETTERMAN DR PRESIDIO BLVD LOMBARD ST C ST AC/AC 2 1,320 28 37,719 12/8/2020 53

FHA628 20 STOREY AVE RALSTON EAST RUCKMAN C ST AC 2 845 23 19,435 12/14/2020 53

FHA459 10 THORNBURG RD THORNBURG PARKING GENERAL KENNEDY AVE R ST AC 2 475 31 14,725 12/8/2020 53

908aP P1 BUILDING 1750 PARKING

RTE 010 LINCOLN W. 

ENTRANCE BLDG 1750 O P AC 1 1,973 40 78,930 12/16/2020 52 

FHA678 10 VISTA CT LIGGETT AVE END R ST AC 2 264 22 5,808 12/7/2020 52

FHA014 020 WEST PACIFIC AVE GATE ARGEULLO BLVD C ST AC 2 1,305 24 31,320 12/10/2020 52

903rP 10 WOOL CT UPTON AVE END R ST AC 2 279 31 14,283 12/11/2020 52

906fbP P1 BUILDING 1416 PARKING RTE 012 WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG 1416 O P AC 1 86 40 3,431 12/10/2020 50

FHA676 10 SIBLEY RD LIGGETT AVE LOOP MORTON ST R ST AC 1 1,267 11 13,937 12/7/2020 50

900qP P1 BUILDING 385 PARKING RTE 449 MORAGA AVE BLDG 387 O P AC 2 637 40 25,488 12/9/2020 49

FHA674 10 MORTON ST RODRIQUEZ ST LIGGETT AVE R ST AC 2 739 18 13,302 12/7/2020 49

903kP P1 BUILDING 1228/1230 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE RTE 620 UPTON AVE FROM 

STOREY 

O P AC 2 1,841 40 73,673 12/11/2020 48 

FHA607 10 EDIE RD GIRARD RD OREILLY AVE R ST AC 2 810 24 19,440 12/8/2020 48

FHA680 10 SUMNER AVE PRESIDIO BLVD MACARTHUR AVE R ST AC 1 1,584 16 25,344 12/9/2020 48

906ebP P1 BUILDING 1440-1443 PARKING RTE 603 BATTERY CAULFIELD BLDG 1440-1443 O P AC 1 195 40 7,825 12/10/2020 47 

905cP P1 BUILDING 682 PARKING PARK BLVD BLDG 682 O P AC 1 415 40 16,600 1/16/2021 47

FHA450 10 BARNARD AVE PRESIDIO BLVD HICKS PARKING R ST AC 2 1,426 20 28,520 12/7/2020 47

FHA646 10 BATTERY WAGNER RD STOREY AVENUE STOREY AVENUE R ST AC 2 739 30 27,416 12/14/2020 47

FHA627 10 RALSTON AVE STOREY AVE LINCOLN BLVD C ST AC 2 3,168 25 81,626 12/11/2020 47

903jP P1 MAINTENANCE AREA PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1355 O P AC 2 2,530 40 101,203 12/14/2020 46 

FHA620 20 UPTON AVE RALSTON AVE STOREY AVE C ST AC 2 1,478 45 66,510 12/11/2020 46

FHA448 20 FUNSTON AVE MORAGA AVE HARDIE AVE R ST PCC 2 176 23 4,048 12/9/2020 45

908bN P1 BUILDING 1752 PARKING

RTE 010 LINCOLN W. 

ENTRANCE BLDG 1752 O P AC 1 615 40 24,625 12/16/2020 44 

FHA672 10 MCRAE ST PORTOLA ST SOUTH PORTOLA ST NORTH R ST AC 1 686 12 14,049 12/7/2020 44

FHA012 70 WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG. 401 DEEMS C ST AC 2 1,820 30 54,600 12/10/2020 44

903aP P1 BUILDING 951 PARKING RTE 652 HOFFMAN ST BLDG 951 O P AC 2 286 40 11,453 12/17/2020 43

FHA655 10 COWLES ST LINCOLN BLVD MCDOWELL AVE R ST AC 2 640 20 12,800 12/14/2020 43

FHA453 10 FRENCH CT GRAHAM ST HALLECK ST C ST AC 2 305 24 7,320 1/16/2021 43

900sP 10 SAL ST GRAHAM ST KEYES AVE R ST AC 2 124 29 3,596 12/8/2020 43

FHA011 10 PARK TR 14TH AVE ENT W. PACIFIC AVE O TR AC 2 1,320 22 30,360 1/16/2021 43

FHA642 10 RUCKMAN AVE RALSTON AVE UPTON C ST AC 2 200 24 4,800 12/14/2020 42

FHA706 10 BROADWAY GATE 

CONNECTION BROADWAY AND LYON ST PRESIDIO BLVD O TR AC 2 475 12 5,700 12/17/2020 42 

902lP P1 VISTA COURT PARKING RTE 678 VISTA CT BLDG 787-789 O P AC 1 158 40 6,327 12/7/2020 40

FHA445 10 GRAHAM ST LINCOLN BLVD MORAGA AVE C ST AC 2 1,637 32 52,384 12/16/2020 40

FHA438 20 LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR LYON ST A ST AC/AC 2 578 32 18,496 12/10/2020 40

FHA654 40 CRISSY FIELD AVE MCDOWELL AVE LINCOLN BLVD WEST O TR AC/PCC 2 986 20 19,720 12/16/2020 40

FHA611 10 KINZEY ST RALSTON AVE EAST RALSTON AVE WEST R ST AC 1 422 22 9,284 1/16/2021 39

FHA620 10 UPTON AVE HITCHCOCK ST RALSTON AVE C ST AC 2 581 20 11,620 12/11/2020 39

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 7/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Descending PCI

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

909eP P1 BUILDING 920/924 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 920/924 O P AC 1 836 40 33,455 12/9/2020 38

FHA643 10 APPLETON ST RUCKMAN AVE STOREY AVE R ST AC 2 1,003 16 16,048 12/14/2020 38

FHA625 10 STILLWELL RD LINCOLN BLVD PERSHING DR R ST AC 2 950 32 30,400 12/15/2020 38

903pP P1 BUILDING 1389 PARKING STOREY AVE BLDG 1389 O P AC 1 1,023 40 40,947 1/16/2021 37

903hcP P1 BUILDING 1205/1206 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1205/1206 O P AC 1 71 40 2,836 12/11/2020 36 

903uP P1 BUILDING 1347 PARKING RTE 623 KOBBE AVE BLDG 1347 O P AC 1 259 40 10,356 12/10/2020 36

900sP P1 THE PRESIDIO PARKING RTE 445 GRAHAM ST RTE 449 MORAGA AVE O P AC 2 2,606 40 104,263 12/8/2020 35

FHA455 10 GORGAS AVE EAST ENTRANCE KENDALL DR C ST AC 2 1,262 50 63,100 12/8/2020 34

900zP P2 ANZA PARKING ANZA AVE SOUTH ANZA AVE MIDDLE O P AC 1 718 108 77,544 1/19/2021 33

903hdP P1 BUILDING 1204/1205 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1204/1205 O P AC 1 86 40 3,426 12/11/2020 33 

FHA649 10 ARMISTEAD RD LINCOLN BLVD LENDRUM CT R ST AC 2 1,162 24 36,892 12/16/2020 32

903haP P1 BUILDING 1207/1208 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1207/1208 O P AC 1 73 40 2,938 12/11/2020 31 

FHA013 40 ARGUELLO BLVD MORAGA AVE SHERIDAN AVE A ST AC 2 400 28 11,200 12/7/2020 31

FHA650 10 LENDRUM CT LINCOLN BLVD END R ST AC 2 792 19 17,804 12/16/2020 31

FHA637 10 GREENOUGH AVE RALSTON AVE KOBBE. AVE R ST AC 2 787 20 17,229 12/11/2020 30

903hfP P1 BUILDING 1202/1203 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1202/1203 O P AC 1 76 40 3,025 12/11/2020 29 

903heP P1 BUILDING 1203/1204 PARKING RTE 627 RALSTON AVE BLDG 1203/1204 O P AC 1 64 40 2,576 12/11/2020 29 

903nP P1 BUILDING 1249 PARKING RTE 643 APPLETON ST BLDG 1249 O P AC 1 1,104 32 41,660 12/14/2020 29

909cbP P1 BUILDING 651 PARKING MCDOWELL AVE BLDG 651 O P PCC 1 166 20 3,332 1/16/2021 29

FHA444 10 ANZA ST SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD R ST AC 2 1,162 28 32,536 12/8/2020 29

FHA632 10 WYMAN AVE WEDEMEYER ST END R ST PCC 2 1,003 19 19,057 12/11/2020 29

903fP P1 BUILDING 1299 PARKING RTE 628 STOREY AVE LOG CABIN - BLDG 1299 O P AC 2 553 40 22,143 12/14/2020 28

FHA684 10 GIBSON RD BOWLEY ST WATER PLANT R ST AC 2 528 20 10,560 12/16/2020 28

FHA657 10 MCDOWELL AVE Lincoln Blvd Cowles St C ST AC 2 748 32 23,936 12/14/2020 28

FHA603 20 BATTERY CAULFIELD RD BLDG 1450 WEDEMEYER ST C ST AC 2 697 24 16,728 12/10/2020 26

FHA613 10 ORD ST RILEY AVE SHERIDAN AVE R ST AC 2 475 18 8,550 12/14/2020 26

900kaP P1 BUILDING 39 PARKING RTE 447 MESA ST BLDG 39 O P AC 2 245 40 9,826 12/8/2020 25

FHA686 10 SHERMAN RD PRESIDIO BLVD RUGER ST R ST AC 2 1,003 16 20,745 12/17/2020 25

909iP P1 BUILDING 641/643 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 641/643 O P PCC 1 151 60 9,056 12/9/2020 24

909hP P1 BUILDING 643/644 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 643/644 O P PCC 1 103 60 6,198 12/9/2020 24

FHA010 35 LINCOLN BLVD MERCHANT/STOREY GG BRIDGE PLAZA ENTRANCE A ST AC 2 1,145 38 43,510 12/16/2020 23 

903mP P1 BUILDING 1241-45 PARKING RTE 643 APPLETON ST BLDG 1241 O P AC 2 1,082 40 43,311 12/14/2020 20

FHA437 20 SHERIDAN AVE RILEY AVE GRAHAM ST C ST AC 2 963 31 29,853 12/10/2020 17

FHA666 10 DEEMS RD WASHINGTON BLVD RESERVOIR PARKING R ST PCC 2 370 12 4,440 12/10/2020 15

901jP P1 BUILDING 1040 PARKING RTE 607 EDIE RD BLDG 1040 O P AC 2 75 25 1,883 12/8/2020 10

FHA687 10 RAWLES ST SIMONDS LOOP SHAFTER RD R ST AC 1 159 18 2,862 12/9/2020 8

903ebP P2 BUILDING 1388 PARKING BUILDING 1299 PARKING BLDG 1388 O P GRAVEL 1 1,299 40 51,965 NA NA

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 8/9
Presidio Trust 2021 PMP Update

Section Description Inventory

Sorted by Descending PCI

StreetID SectionID Street Name Begin Location End Location FC General 

Code ST No. of Lanes

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Area

(sf) PCI Date PCI

906eaP P1 BUILDING 1450/1451 PARKING RTE 603 BATTERY CAULFIELD BLDG 1451 O P GRAVEL 2 291 40 11,665 NA NA

906cbP P1 BUILDING 1562-66 EVEN 

PARKING PERSHING DR BLDG 1562-1566 O P GRAVEL 1 287 15 4,317 NA NA

909caP P1 BUILDING 650 BACK PARKING MCDOWELL AVE BLDG 650 O P GRAVEL 1 186 14 2,617 NA NA

FHA401 10 BATTERY DYNAMITE RD LINCOLN BLVD RALSTON AVE R ST GRAVEL 1 528 15 7,920 NA NA

903xP 10 WISSER CT UPTON AVE END R ST GRAVEL 1 432 13 10,565 NA NA

FHA403 10 INCINERATOR RD PATTEN RD END O TR GRAVEL 1 385 15 5,775 NA NA

FC (Funct. Class): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residential), O (Other)

General Code: P (Parking Lot), ST (Street), TR (Trail)

ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (AC Overlay), AC/PCC (Composite), PCC (Portland Cement Concrete) 9/9
APPENDIX B 
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree 

 
Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. 

Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) Decision Tree

This report presents the current maintenance and rehabilitation decision tree that exists in the database. 

The decision tree forms the basis for all of the budgetary computations included in this report. Changes 

to the decision tree will make the results in the budget reports invalid. All pavement treatment unit 

costs relevant to the road types in the database were updated. 

The decision tree lists the treatments and costs selected for preventive maintenance and rehabilitation 

activities. Each line represents a specific combination of functional classification and surface type. 

The preventive maintenance portion of the report is identified as Condition Category I – Very Good. All 

preventive maintenance treatment listings are assigned only to sections in Condition Category I where the 

PCI ≥ 70. Sections with PCI values less than 70 are assigned to treatments listed in Categories II through 

V. 

In the preventive maintenance category (PCI  70), a time sequence is used to identify the appropriate 

treatment and cost. Each preventive maintenance treatment description consists of three parts: 1) a 

CRACK treatment, 2) a SURFACE treatment, and 3) a RESTORATION treatment. These three parts 

allow the user to specify one of three different preventive maintenance treatments depending on the prior 

maintenance history of the section. 

1. The CRACK treatment part can be used to specify the most frequent type of preventive 

maintenance activity planned (typically crack seals). 

2. The SURFACE treatment part can be used to specify more extensive and less frequent 

preventive maintenance activities, such as chip seals or slurry seals. For example, a crack 

seal can be specified on a 3-year cycle with a slurry seal specified after 5 years. 

3. The RESTORATION part can be used to specify a surface restoration treatment (such as 

an overlay) to be performed after a specified number of surface treatments. For example, 

after a certain number of successive slurry seals, an overlay can be specified instead of 

another slurry seal. 

Rehabilitation treatments are assigned to sections in Condition Categories II through V (PCI less than 70). 

Each line is defined by a specific combination of functional classification, surface type, and condition 

category. 

COLUMN DESCRIPTION

Functional Class Functional Classification identifying the branch 

Surface Surface Type identifying the branch number. 

Condition Category Condition Category (I through V). 

Treatment Type First Row (Crack Treatment) indicates localized treatment (e.g. crack sealing). 

Second Row (Surface Treatment) indicates surface treatment (e.g. slurry sealing). 

Third Row (Restoration Treatment) indicates surface restoration (e.g. overlay). 

Treatment Name of treatments from the "Treatment Descriptions" report.

Yrs. Between Crack Seals First Row - number of years between successive treatment applications specified in the first 

row (i.e. CRACK treatment). 
Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. 

COLUMN DESCRIPTION

Yrs. Between Surface Seals Second Row - number of years between successive treatment applications specified in the 

second row (i.e. SURFACE treatment).

Number of Sequential Seals Number of times that the treatment application in the second row (i.e. SURFACE treatment) 

will be performed prior to performing the treatment application in the third row. 

Note that the treatments assigned to each section should not be blindly followed in preparing a road 

maintenance program. Engineering judgment and project level analysis should be applied to ensure that 

the treatment is appropriate and cost effective for the section. 
Arterial AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.50 7

Surface Treatment MICROSURFACING $6.00 7

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related CAPE SEAL $13.00 7

III - Good, Load Related 1.5 INCH OVERLAY $29.00

IV - Poor CIR w/ OVERLAY $49.00

V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT or FDR $146.00

AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.50 7

Surface Treatment MICROSURFACING $6.00 7

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related CAPE SEAL $13.00 7

III - Good, Load Related 1.5 INCH OVERLAY $29.00

IV - Poor 2.5 INCH OVERLAY $49.00

V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT or FDR $146.00

AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 7

Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 7

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00

V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00

PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 7

Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 7

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00

V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00

# of Surface

Seals before

Overlay

Functional

Class

Presidio of San Francisco

Printed: 2/1/2021

Decision Tree

Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between

Crack Seals

Yrs Between

Surface Seals

Cost/Sq Yd,

except Seal

Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used

Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver

 Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Collector AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.50 7

Surface Treatment MICROSURFACING $6.00 7

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related CAPE SEAL $11.00 7

III - Good, Load Related 1.5 INCH OVERLAY $27.00

IV - Poor CIR w/ OVERLAY $48.00

V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT or FDR $100.00

AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.50 7

Surface Treatment MICROSURFACING $6.00 7

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related CAPE SEAL $11.00 7

III - Good, Load Related 1.5 INCH OVERLAY $27.00

IV - Poor CIR w/ OVERLAY $48.00

V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT or FDR $100.00

AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 7

Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 7

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00

V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00

PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 7

Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 7

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00

V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00

# of Surface

Seals before

Overlay

Functional

Class

Presidio of San Francisco

Printed: 2/1/2021

Decision Tree

Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between

Crack Seals

Yrs Between

Surface Seals

Cost/Sq Yd,

except Seal

Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used

Criteria: 3 MTC StreetSaver

 Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Residential/Local AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.50 8

Surface Treatment MICROSURFACING $6.00 8

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related CAPE SEAL $10.50 8

III - Good, Load Related CAPE SEAL $13.00 8

IV - Poor 2.5 INCH OVERLAY $42.00

V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT or FDR $74.00

AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.50 8

Surface Treatment MICROSURFACING $6.00 8

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related CAPE SEAL $10.50 8

III - Good, Load Related CAPE SEAL $13.00 8

IV - Poor 2.5 INCH OVERLAY $42.00

V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT or FDR $74.00

AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8

Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00

V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00

PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8

Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00

V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) $94.00

# of Surface

Seals before

Overlay

Functional

Class

Presidio of San Francisco

Printed: 2/1/2021

Decision Tree

Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between

Crack Seals

Yrs Between

Surface Seals

Cost/Sq Yd,

except Seal

Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used

Criteria: 5 MTC StreetSaver

 Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Other AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.50 8

Surface Treatment MICROSURFACING $6.00 8

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related CAPE SEAL $10.50 8

III - Good, Load Related CAPE SEAL $13.00 8

IV - Poor 2.5 INCH OVERLAY $42.00

V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $78.00

AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.50 8

Surface Treatment MICROSURFACING $6.00 8

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related CAPE SEAL $10.50 8

III - Good, Load Related CAPE SEAL $13.00 8

IV - Poor 2.5 INCH OVERLAY $42.00

V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $78.00

AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.50 8

Surface Treatment MICROSURFACING $6.00 8

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related CAPE SEAL $10.50 8

III - Good, Load Related CAPE SEAL $13.00 8

IV - Poor 2.5 INCH OVERLAY $42.00

V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $94.00

PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8

Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8

Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99

II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00

IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00

V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) $94.00

# of Surface

Seals before

Overlay

Functional

Class

Presidio of San Francisco

Printed: 2/1/2021

Decision Tree

Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between

Crack Seals

Yrs Between

Surface Seals

Cost/Sq Yd,

except Seal

Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used

Criteria: 7 MTC StreetSaver

 Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
APPENDIX C 

 
Budget Needs 

Projected PCI/Cost Summary 

Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary 

Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary 
Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. 

Budget Needs Reports

The purpose of this section is to answer the question: If the Presidio had all the money in the world, 

what sections should be fixed and how much will it cost? Based on the Maintenance & Rehabilitation 

(M&R) decision tree and the PCIs of the sections, the program will then select a maintenance or 

rehabilitation action and compute the total costs over a period of twenty years. The Budget Needs 

represents the "ideal world" funding levels, while the Budget Scenario reports in the next section 

represent the most "cost effective" prioritization possible for the actual funding levels. 

A budget needs analysis has been performed. The summary results from the analysis are shown below. 

An interest rate of 3% and an inflation factor of 3% were used to project the costs for the next twenty 

years. This report shows the total twenty-year budget that would be required to meet the Presidio’s 

standards as exemplified in the M&R decision tree. 

Budget Needs reports included in this appendix are listed below: 

 Projected PCI/Cost Summary 

 Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary 

 Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary 
Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. 

Needs - Projected PCI/Cost Summary 

This report summarizes and projects the network PCI over the twenty-year analysis period, both with and 

without treatments applied. It also reports the associated costs, which are based on the treatment unit costs 

presented in the M&R decision tree. 

COLUMN DESCRIPTION

Year Year in the analysis period. 

PCI Treated Projected network average PCI with all needed treatments applied. 

PCI Untreated Projected network average PCI without any treatments applied. 

PM Cost Total preventive maintenance treatment cost. 

Rehab Cost Total rehabilitation treatment cost. 

Cost The budget required for each year in the analysis period to meet the Presidio’s 

standard as shown on the M&R decision tree.

Total Cost Total budget required over a twenty-year period. 

 
Year PCI Treated PCI Untreated PM Cost Rehab Cost Cost

2021 87 66 $912,234 $12,585,244 $13,497,478

2022 83 64 $71,493 $16,009 $87,502

2023 82 61 $574,117 $662,113 $1,236,230

2024 81 59 $50,746 $255,525 $306,271

2025 79 56 $0 $0 $0

2026 77 54 $0 $120,163 $120,163

2027 75 51 $90,529 $274,092 $364,621

2028 77 49 $1,018,250 $1,892,266 $2,910,516

2029 80 46 $1,606,061 $2,727,390 $4,333,451

2030 79 44 $355,468 $266,607 $622,075

2031 78 41 $530,564 $266,178 $796,742

2032 76 39 $67,765 $0 $67,765

2033 75 36 $18,474 $935,228 $953,702

2034 76 34 $153,478 $2,335,391 $2,488,869

2035 76 31 $1,176,851 $1,721,215 $2,898,066

2036 75 29 $150,459 $1,133,476 $1,283,935

2037 80 27 $2,143,028 $4,889,379 $7,032,407

2038 78 25 $121,230 $25,690 $146,920

2039 78 23 $650,968 $337,187 $988,155

2040 76 22 $252,339 $245,840 $498,179

Total Cost

$40,633,047

PM Total Cost

$9,944,054

% PM

24.47% $30,688,993

Rehab Total Cost

Needs - Projected PCI/Cost

Summary

Printed: 2/1/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Inflation Rate = % 3.00

Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. 

Needs - Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary

This report summarizes each preventive maintenance treatment type, quantity of pavement affected, and 

total costs over the analysis period. It also summarizes the total quantities and costs over the next twenty 

years. 

COLUMN DESCRIPTION

Treatment Type of preventive maintenance treatments needed. 

Year Year in the analysis period (i.e. 2021, 2021, 2022, etc.). 

Area Treated Quantities in linear feet (Seal Cracks) or square yard (Slurry Seal). 

Cost Maintenance treatment cost. 
Treatment Year Area Treated Cost

MICROSURFACING 2021 152,036 sq. yd. $912,234

2022 11,568.11 sq. yd. $71,493

2023 90,188.78 sq. yd. $574,117

2024 7,739.56 sq. yd. $50,746

2027 12,636 sq. yd. $90,529

2028 137,986.22 sq. yd. $1,018,250

2029 211,300.56 sq. yd. $1,606,061

2030 45,404.78 sq. yd. $355,468

2031 65,795.11 sq. yd. $530,564

2032 8,158.89 sq. yd. $67,765

2033 2,159.44 sq. yd. $18,474

2034 17,418.22 sq. yd. $153,478

2035 129,671.22 sq. yd. $1,176,851

2036 16,095.22 sq. yd. $150,459

2037 222,572.67 sq. yd. $2,143,028

2038 12,224 sq. yd. $121,230

2039 63,726.78 sq. yd. $650,968

2040 23,983.93 sq. yd. $252,339

Total 1,230,665.49 $9,944,054

Inflation Rate = % 3.00

Presidio of San Francisco Needs - Preventive Maintenance

Treatment/Cost Summary

Printed: 2/1/2021

Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver

Total Quantity 1,230,665.49 $9,944,054
Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. 

Needs - Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary 

This report summarizes each rehabilitation treatment type, quantity of pavement affected, and total costs 

over the analysis period. It also summarizes the total quantities and costs over the next twenty years. 

COLUMN DESCRIPTION

Treatment Type of rehabilitation treatments needed. 

Year Year in the analysis period (i.e. 2021, 2021, 2022, etc.). 

Area Treated Quantities in square yard. 

Cost Rehabilitation treatment cost. 
Treatment Year Area Treated Cost

1.5 INCH OVERLAY 2021 37,031.56 sq.yd. $1,056,405

2023 8,787.11 sq.yd. $251,702

2040 4,834.44 sq.yd. $245,840

Total 50,653.11 sq.yd. $1,553,947

2.5 INCH OVERLAY 2021 114,197.44 sq.yd. $4,810,692

2029 13,757.22 sq.yd. $731,947

2036 3,975.56 sq.yd. $260,141

2037 27,433.22 sq.yd. $1,848,941

Total 159,363.44 sq.yd. $7,651,721

CAPE SEAL 2021 237,441.18 sq.yd. $2,702,339

2022 1,284.44 sq.yd. $16,009

2023 34,375.56 sq.yd. $410,411

2028 100,894.93 sq.yd. $1,516,350

2029 142,665.02 sq.yd. $1,995,443

2030 18,447 sq.yd. $266,607

2031 17,213 sq.yd. $266,178

2035 42,830.89 sq.yd. $819,699

2037 147,855.8 sq.yd. $2,618,010

2038 1,284.44 sq.yd. $25,690

2039 17,213 sq.yd. $337,187

Total 761,505.27 sq.yd. $10,973,923

CIR w/ OVERLAY 2021 43,758.22 sq.yd. $2,101,642

2026 2,159.44 sq.yd. $120,163

2027 4,782.22 sq.yd. $274,092

2028 6,367.78 sq.yd. $375,916

2033 13,665.6 sq.yd. $935,228

2034 31,813.56 sq.yd. $2,273,302

2035 12,307.11 sq.yd. $901,516

2036 11,678.33 sq.yd. $873,335

2037 5,484.22 sq.yd. $422,428

Total 132,016.49 sq.yd. $8,277,622

RECONSTRUCT or FDR 2021 10,774.44 sq.yd. $1,231,631

Total 10,774.44 sq.yd. $1,231,631

RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) 2021 6,113.33 sq.yd. $476,841

Total 6,113.33 sq.yd. $476,841

RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) 2021 2,188.22 sq.yd. $205,694

2024 2,487.67 sq.yd. $255,525

2034 449.78 sq.yd. $62,089

Total 5,125.67 sq.yd. $523,308

Needs - Rehabilitation

Treatment/Cost Summary

Printed: 2/1/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Inflation Rate = % 3.00

Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver

Total Cost $30,688,993
APPENDIX D 
Scenario 1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50% 

Cost Summary Report 

Network Condition Summary Report 
Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Cost Summary

Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/2/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

2021 $1,000,000

$749,726

$194,788

$0

$554,938

$0

$250,004 $0 $8,499,278 $0

$53,962

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2022 $1,750,000

$1,311,503

$10,615

$222,831

$1,078,057

$0

$437,825 $0 $8,076,732 $0

$110

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2023 $2,800,000

$2,127,640

$3,105

$251,702

$1,872,833

$0

$667,226 $4,774 $7,735,868 $0

$5,122

24%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2024 $2,500,000

$2,324,954

$11,362

$516,761

$1,796,831

$0

$155,067 $19,933 $7,411,846 $0

$3,016

7%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2025 $2,500,000

$2,492,972

$450,354

$201,716

$1,840,902

$0

$0 $0 $6,796,479 $0

$0

0%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2026 $1,600,000

$1,584,205

$0

$0

$1,064,644

$519,561

$0 $0 $6,743,271 $0

$63,850

0%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2027 $1,200,000

$1,110,817

$0

$0

$1,025,855

$84,962

$88,021 $0 $6,697,659 $0

$0

7%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2028 $2,100,000

$1,558,921

$627,798

$0

$468,281

$462,842

$539,934 $0 $6,789,502 $0

$2,622

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap

Preventative

Maintenance

Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:

1 MTC StreetSaver
2029 $2,250,000

$1,662,304

$167,752

$0

$1,456,939

$37,613

$585,938 $0 $6,777,905 $0

$4,829

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2030 $1,850,000

$1,370,510

$67,538

$3,208

$1,299,764

$0

$479,434 $0 $6,795,067 $0

$1,703

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2031 $1,900,000

$1,396,477

$178,035

$94,081

$576,964

$547,397

$503,236 $0 $6,770,390 $0

$52,840

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2032 $1,600,000

$1,197,569

$61,275

$0

$775,947

$360,347

$401,609 $0 $6,748,567 $0

$1,082

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2033 $1,400,000

$1,023,266

$198,218

$128,433

$423,002

$273,613

$375,504 $0 $6,734,175 $0

$3,254

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2034 $1,000,000

$694,130

$0

$0

$370,071

$324,059

$305,587 $0 $6,744,821 $0

$2,941

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2035 $1,600,000

$1,165,968

$304,989

$0

$0

$860,979

$432,847 $0 $6,791,213 $0

$4,896

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2036 $1,000,000

$691,648

$28,754

$0

$34,514

$628,380

$306,541 $0 $6,694,561 $0

$37,929

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2037 $3,000,000

$2,244,480

$254,438

$0

$1,990,042

$0

$755,121 $0 $6,796,007 $0

$4,001

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2038 $2,100,000

$1,574,662

$360,795

$40,361

$1,173,506

$0

$524,665 $335 $6,747,917 $0

$4,743

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap

Preventative

Maintenance

Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:

2 MTC StreetSaver
2039 $1,250,000

$935,298

$813,141

$122,157

$0

$0

$313,638 $0 $6,749,250 $0

$4,004

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2040 $1,250,000

$937,013

$543,867

$393,146

$0

$0

$311,821 $679 $6,791,321 $0

$956

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap

Summary

Stop Gap

Funded Unmet

Arterial $4,063,483 $1,905,784 $0 $10,201

Collector $6,826,086 $2,544,526 $0 $24,331

Other $9,492,040 $2,170,220 $0 $165,839

Residential/Local $7,772,454 $813,488 $0 $51,487

Grand Total: $28,154,063 $7,434,018 $0 $251,858

Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap

Preventative

Maintenance

Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:

3 MTC StreetSaver
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM

2021 $1,000,000 25%

2022 $1,750,000 25%

2023 $2,800,000 24%

2024 $2,500,000 7%

2025 $2,500,000 0%

2026 $1,600,000 0%

2027 $1,200,000 7%

2028 $2,100,000 25%

2029 $2,250,000 25%

2030 $1,850,000 25%

2031 $1,900,000 25%

2032 $1,600,000 25%

2033 $1,400,000 25%

2034 $1,000,000 25%

2035 $1,600,000 25%

2036 $1,000,000 25%

2037 $3,000,000 25%

2038 $2,100,000 25%

2039 $1,250,000 25%

2040 $1,250,000 25%

Projected Network Average PCI by Year

With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline

Miles

Treated

Lane Miles

Year Never Treated

2021 66 72 10.84 21.00

2022 64 72 6.44 11.04

2023 61 74 9.23 14.28

2024 59 75 3.85 6.21

2025 56 75 5.32 9.03

2026 54 75 2.21 3.87

2027 51 74 1.52 3.01

2028 49 74 6.27 12.30

2029 46 75 6.60 12.57

2030 44 75 5.33 9.10

2031 41 76 6.69 10.52

2032 39 76 3.07 5.25

2033 36 75 4.01 7.08

2034 34 75 1.91 3.57

2035 31 75 3.28 6.54

2036 29 74 2.18 4.04

2037 27 75 6.87 13.14

2038 25 75 4.90 8.67

2039 23 74 5.44 8.36

2040 22 74 4.19 6.17

Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category

Condition in base year 2021, prior to applying treatments.

Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total

I 7.4% 7.8% 8.6% 18.3% 42.1%

II / III 9.7% 6.7% 8.5% 10.4% 35.3%

IV 0.4% 5.4% 5.0% 9.4% 20.2%

V 0.6% 0.4% 0.4% 1.0% 2.4%

Total 18.1% 20.3% 22.5% 39.1% 100.0%

Condition in year 2021 after schedulable treatments applied.

Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total

Scenarios - Network Condition Summary

Printed: 2/2/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Interest: 3% Inflation: 3%

Criteria: MTC StreetSaver

Scenarios Criteria:

1
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary

Printed: 2/2/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Interest: 3% Inflation: 3%

I 15.6% 57.0%

II / III 2.3% 26.7%

IV 0.2% 14.9%

V 0.0% 1.4%

Total 18.1%

11.4%

6.5%

2.4%

0.0%

20.3%

9.1%

9.5%

3.5%

0.4%

22.5%

20.9%

8.4%

8.8%

1.0%

39.1% 100.0%

Condition

Condition in year 2040 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Other

I 16.0% 20.1% 32.2%

II / III 1.9% 0.2% 2.4%

IV 0.0% 0.0% 0.8%

V 0.2% 0.0% 3.7%

Total 18.1% 20.3%

Res/Loc

19.4%

2.8%

0.0%

0.3%

22.5% 39.1%

Total

87.7%

7.3%

0.8%

4.2%

100.0%

Criteria: MTC StreetSaver

Scenarios Criteria:

2
 Scenario 2: Average Annual Budget of $1.7 Million 

Cost Summary Report 

Network Condition Summary Report 

 
Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Cost Summary

Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/3/2021

Scenario: 2021 S2b: Average Annual Budget

$1.7M/yr

2021 $0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0 $0 $9,498,995 $0

$58,462

0%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2022 $2,100,000

$1,574,742

$190,828

$222,831

$1,161,083

$0

$524,971 $29 $8,756,063 $0

$110

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2023 $2,100,000

$1,573,589

$9,544

$251,702

$1,312,343

$0

$525,875 $0 $9,130,962 $0

$5,043

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2024 $2,100,000

$1,910,544

$1,750

$515,124

$1,393,670

$0

$189,175 $0 $9,229,106 $0

$3,016

9%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2025 $2,100,000

$2,097,168

$27,207

$0

$2,069,961

$0

$2,252 $0 $9,448,081 $0

$143

0%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2026 $1,700,000

$1,697,640

$0

$0

$1,697,640

$0

$0 $0 $9,360,986 $0

$79,634

0%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2027 $1,700,000

$1,630,760

$94,499

$120,325

$1,221,358

$194,578

$65,482 $2,518 $8,896,505 $0

$0

4%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2028 $1,700,000

$1,265,337

$400,890

$0

$535,433

$329,014

$434,660 $0 $9,035,867 $0

$4,524

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap

Preventative

Maintenance

Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:

1 MTC StreetSaver
2029 $1,700,000

$1,359,719

$330,112

$0

$1,029,607

$0

$338,784 $0 $10,775,976 $0

$4,708

19%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2030 $1,700,000

$1,376,756

$40,053

$0

$1,336,703

$0

$322,199 $801 $11,030,549 $0

$4,397

19%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2031 $1,700,000

$1,273,713

$69,855

$0

$1,203,858

$0

$426,244 $0 $11,718,056 $0

$83,846

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2032 $1,700,000

$1,272,749

$19,555

$3,404

$1,249,790

$0

$426,718 $0 $11,123,085 $0

$4,472

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2033 $1,700,000

$1,272,286

$519,075

$7,604

$745,607

$0

$426,943 $0 $10,171,536 $0

$205

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2034 $1,700,000

$1,247,799

$469,347

$200,347

$370,071

$208,034

$451,463 $0 $9,699,100 $0

$3,365

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2035 $1,700,000

$1,257,440

$429,901

$0

$0

$827,539

$442,226 $0 $9,816,317 $0

$7,379

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2036 $1,700,000

$1,243,225

$92,226

$0

$36,950

$1,114,049

$456,568 $0 $9,453,815 $0

$68,022

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2037 $1,700,000

$1,225,855

$26,835

$0

$34,995

$1,164,025

$473,942 $0 $9,626,954 $0

$1,512

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2038 $1,700,000

$1,220,649

$130,720

$0

$679,662

$410,267

$479,255 $0 $9,474,031 $0

$149

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap

Preventative

Maintenance

Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:

2 MTC StreetSaver
2039 $1,700,000

$1,220,236

$136,278

$0

$1,083,958

$0

$479,252 $0 $9,480,419 $0

$3,409

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2040 $1,700,000

$1,252,805

$147,587

$4,311

$467,797

$633,110

$446,420 $0 $9,060,597 $0

$6,186

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap

Summary

Stop Gap

Funded Unmet

Arterial $3,059,746 $1,917,595 $0 $18,454

Collector $5,804,683 $2,448,145 $0 $52,488

Other $10,373,113 $1,674,731 $0 $193,810

Residential/Local $7,735,470 $871,958 $0 $73,828

Grand Total: $26,973,012 $6,912,429 $0 $338,580

Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap

Preventative

Maintenance

Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:

3 MTC StreetSaver
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM

2021 $0 0%

2022 $2,100,000 25%

2023 $2,100,000 25%

2024 $2,100,000 9%

2025 $2,100,000 0%

2026 $1,700,000 0%

2027 $1,700,000 4%

2028 $1,700,000 25%

2029 $1,700,000 19%

2030 $1,700,000 19%

2031 $1,700,000 25%

2032 $1,700,000 25%

2033 $1,700,000 25%

2034 $1,700,000 25%

2035 $1,700,000 25%

2036 $1,700,000 25%

2037 $1,700,000 25%

2038 $1,700,000 25%

2039 $1,700,000 25%

2040 $1,700,000 25%

Projected Network Average PCI by Year

With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline

Miles

Treated

Lane Miles

Year Never Treated

2021 66 71 6.79 13.35

2022 64 71 7.93 14.73

2023 61 72 6.32 10.17

2024 59 72 4.66 6.93

2025 56 73 2.60 4.12

2026 54 73 2.56 4.23

2027 51 72 3.13 5.27

2028 49 72 4.64 9.21

2029 46 72 4.48 8.91

2030 44 72 3.93 7.30

2031 41 72 4.29 7.92

2032 39 72 5.40 8.71

2033 36 72 5.48 9.08

2034 34 72 4.96 8.25

2035 31 73 3.94 7.21

2036 29 73 3.56 6.92

2037 27 73 2.79 5.26

2038 25 73 3.91 7.02

2039 23 73 4.50 8.33

2040 22 72 4.52 6.33

Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category

Condition in base year 2021, prior to applying treatments.

Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total

I 7.4% 7.8% 8.6% 18.3% 42.1%

II / III 9.7% 6.7% 8.5% 10.4% 35.3%

IV 0.4% 5.4% 5.0% 9.4% 20.2%

V 0.6% 0.4% 0.4% 1.0% 2.4%

Total 18.1% 20.3% 22.5% 39.1% 100.0%

Condition in year 2021 after schedulable treatments applied.

Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total

Scenarios - Network Condition Summary

Printed: 2/3/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Scenario: 2021 S2b: Average Annual Budget

$1.7M/yr

Interest: 3% Inflation: 3%

Criteria: MTC StreetSaver

Scenarios Criteria:

1
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary

Printed: 2/3/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Scenario: 2021 S2b: Average Annual Budget

$1.7M/yr

Interest: 3% Inflation: 3%

I 14.6% 10.5% 8.7% 19.5% 53.3%

II / III 3.3% 6.5% 9.5% 9.5% 28.8%

IV 0.2% 3.3% 3.9% 9.1% 16.5%

V 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 1.0% 1.4%

Total 18.1% 20.3% 22.5% 39.1% 100.0%

Condition

Condition in year 2040 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Res/Loc Total

I 14.5% 18.7% 80.0%

II / III 1.3% 3.4% 12.0%

IV 2.2% 0.0% 2.9%

V 0.2% 0.4% 5.0%

Total 18.1%

Collector

18.9%

0.2%

0.0%

1.2%

20.3% 22.5%

Other

27.9%

7.1%

0.8%

3.3%

39.1% 100.0%

Criteria: MTC StreetSaver

Scenarios Criteria:

2
Scenario 3: Maintain PCI at 70 

Cost Summary Report 

Network Condition Summary Report 

 
Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Cost Summary

Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/2/2021

Scenario: 2021 S3: Maintain PCI at 70

2021 $0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0 $0 $9,498,995 $0

$58,462

0%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2022 $1,500,000

$1,124,334

$188,819

$222,831

$712,684

$0

$374,780 $220 $9,356,659 $0

$110

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2023 $1,500,000

$1,124,407

$0

$251,702

$872,705

$0

$375,323 $0 $10,349,302 $0

$5,161

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2024 $1,500,000

$1,123,871

$3,198

$515,124

$605,549

$0

$375,794 $0 $11,084,042 $0

$3,016

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2025 $1,600,000

$1,227,410

$0

$0

$1,227,410

$0

$371,727 $0 $11,858,964 $0

$143

23%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2026 $1,800,000

$1,726,675

$0

$0

$1,726,675

$0

$62,703 $9,297 $12,299,192 $0

$98,211

4%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2027 $1,900,000

$1,801,831

$0

$0

$1,801,831

$0

$90,529 $4,471 $11,726,737 $0

$128

5%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2028 $1,900,000

$1,420,377

$400,890

$0

$1,019,487

$0

$477,604 $0 $11,753,024 $0

$8,011

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap

Preventative

Maintenance

Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:

1 MTC StreetSaver
2029 $1,900,000

$1,536,243

$130,003

$0

$1,406,240

$0

$362,903 $0 $13,305,072 $0

$7,127

19%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2030 $1,800,000

$1,455,595

$67,684

$10,167

$1,377,744

$0

$337,746 $4,254 $13,707,777 $0

$2,064

19%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2031 $1,900,000

$1,418,597

$0

$0

$1,418,597

$0

$479,510 $0 $14,383,320 $0

$116,027

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2032 $1,600,000

$1,195,474

$4,051

$0

$1,191,423

$0

$404,517 $0 $13,889,866 $0

$393

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2033 $1,500,000

$1,119,127

$27,426

$0

$1,091,701

$0

$379,937 $0 $13,871,268 $0

$1,726

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2034 $1,500,000

$1,112,443

$0

$0

$1,112,443

$0

$387,203 $0 $14,563,006 $0

$6,976

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2035 $1,600,000

$1,185,695

$271,799

$0

$878,301

$35,595

$412,570 $0 $14,891,507 $0

$4,645

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2036 $1,600,000

$1,171,507

$240,469

$0

$0

$931,038

$427,831 $0 $14,787,242 $0

$116,846

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2037 $1,600,000

$1,191,812

$29,616

$0

$0

$1,162,196

$408,022 $0 $15,005,369 $0

$0

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2038 $1,600,000

$1,199,367

$206,109

$12,879

$0

$980,379

$400,124 $0 $14,701,804 $0

$72

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap

Preventative

Maintenance

Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:

2 MTC StreetSaver
2039 $1,600,000

$1,159,801

$915,363

$113,078

$0

$131,360

$440,190 $0 $14,592,895 $0

$3,901

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2040 $1,600,000

$1,196,347

$157,742

$0

$1,038,605

$0

$403,578 $0 $15,456,935 $0

$11,558

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap

Summary

Stop Gap

Funded Unmet

Arterial $3,059,746 $1,912,478 $0 $18,454

Collector $5,090,558 $2,290,747 $0 $81,023

Other $8,010,634 $1,917,046 $0 $236,762

Residential/Local $8,329,975 $852,320 $0 $108,334

Grand Total: $24,490,913 $6,972,591 $0 $444,574

Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap

Preventative

Maintenance

Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:

3 MTC StreetSaver
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM

2021 $0 0%

2022 $1,500,000 25%

2023 $1,500,000 25%

2024 $1,500,000 25%

2025 $1,600,000 23%

2026 $1,800,000 4%

2027 $1,900,000 5%

2028 $1,900,000 25%

2029 $1,900,000 19%

2030 $1,800,000 19%

2031 $1,900,000 25%

2032 $1,600,000 25%

2033 $1,500,000 25%

2034 $1,500,000 25%

2035 $1,600,000 25%

2036 $1,600,000 25%

2037 $1,600,000 25%

2038 $1,600,000 25%

2039 $1,600,000 25%

2040 $1,600,000 25%

Projected Network Average PCI by Year

With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline

Miles

Treated

Lane Miles

Year Never Treated

2021 66 71 6.79 13.35

2022 64 70 5.53 10.14

2023 61 70 5.39 9.48

2024 59 70 4.14 6.64

2025 56 70 5.26 7.56

2026 54 70 2.52 3.87

2027 51 70 2.51 4.50

2028 49 70 5.66 10.85

2029 46 70 4.12 8.25

2030 44 70 4.72 8.60

2031 41 70 4.58 7.93

2032 39 70 4.14 6.55

2033 36 70 4.56 6.25

2034 34 70 3.04 5.87

2035 31 70 3.61 7.05

2036 29 70 3.18 6.18

2037 27 70 3.14 5.95

2038 25 70 3.59 6.41

2039 23 70 5.96 10.12

2040 22 70 3.85 6.59

Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category

Condition in base year 2021, prior to applying treatments.

Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total

I 7.4% 7.8% 8.6% 18.3% 42.1%

II / III 9.7% 6.7% 8.5% 10.4% 35.3%

IV 0.4% 5.4% 5.0% 9.4% 20.2%

V 0.6% 0.4% 0.4% 1.0% 2.4%

Total 18.1% 20.3% 22.5% 39.1% 100.0%

Condition in year 2021 after schedulable treatments applied.

Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total

Scenarios - Network Condition Summary

Printed: 2/2/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Scenario: 2021 S3: Maintain PCI at 70

Interest: 3% Inflation: 3%

Criteria: MTC StreetSaver

Scenarios Criteria:

1
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary

Printed: 2/2/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Scenario: 2021 S3: Maintain PCI at 70

Interest: 3% Inflation: 3%

I 14.6% 10.5% 8.7% 19.5% 53.3%

II / III 3.3% 6.5% 9.5% 9.5% 28.8%

IV 0.2% 3.3% 3.9% 9.1% 16.5%

V 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 1.0% 1.4%

Total 18.1% 20.3% 22.5% 39.1% 100.0%

Condition

Condition in year 2040 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Res/Loc Total

I 14.5% 19.3% 79.7%

II / III 1.3% 2.2% 6.9%

IV 2.2% 0.6% 3.5%

V 0.2% 0.4% 9.9%

Total 18.1%

Collector

17.6%

0.4%

0.0%

2.3%

20.3% 22.5%

Other

28.3%

3.0%

0.8%

7.0%

39.1% 100.0%

Criteria: MTC StreetSaver

Scenarios Criteria:

2
Scenario 4: Maintain PCI at 66 

Cost Summary Report 

Network Condition Summary Report 

 
Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Cost Summary

Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/2/2021

Scenario: 2021 S4: Maintain at 66

2021 $0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0 $0 $9,498,995 $0

$58,462

0%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2022 $500,000

$373,580

$116,972

$222,831

$33,777

$0

$126,272 $0 $10,355,907 $0

$172

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2023 $500,000

$374,819

$11,561

$253,292

$109,966

$0

$125,166 $0 $12,378,269 $0

$5,043

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2024 $1,000,000

$746,957

$77,341

$515,124

$154,492

$0

$252,401 $0 $13,848,222 $0

$6,266

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2025 $1,600,000

$1,229,579

$0

$0

$1,229,579

$0

$370,206 $0 $14,710,045 $0

$276

23%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2026 $1,800,000

$1,726,100

$11,134

$0

$1,714,966

$0

$73,576 $0 $15,670,996 $0

$113,638

4%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2027 $1,900,000

$1,800,009

$6,088

$0

$1,793,921

$0

$99,858 $0 $15,633,941 $0

$199

5%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2028 $1,900,000

$1,417,876

$400,890

$6,559

$1,010,427

$0

$481,210 $0 $16,038,010 $0

$7,918

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap

Preventative

Maintenance

Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:

1 MTC StreetSaver
2029 $1,900,000

$1,519,184

$40,343

$0

$1,478,841

$0

$379,397 $0 $17,433,789 $0

$9,521

19%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2030 $1,800,000

$1,452,344

$17,312

$0

$1,435,032

$0

$346,338 $0 $18,775,612 $0

$645

19%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2031 $1,800,000

$1,346,943

$103,277

$0

$1,243,666

$0

$449,334 $666 $19,219,586 $0

$155,093

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2032 $1,600,000

$1,247,872

$13,332

$3,404

$1,231,136

$0

$334,036 $17,964 $18,855,493 $0

$3,362

22%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2033 $1,500,000

$1,123,022

$20,141

$0

$1,102,881

$0

$376,842 $0 $19,008,972 $0

$6,294

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2034 $1,500,000

$1,121,936

$0

$0

$1,121,936

$0

$375,764 $0 $19,681,004 $0

$10,636

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2035 $1,600,000

$1,198,558

$210,324

$0

$988,234

$0

$400,047 $0 $20,351,473 $0

$4,276

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2036 $1,600,000

$1,191,178

$386,999

$0

$804,179

$0

$408,090 $0 $20,050,922 $0

$166,026

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2037 $1,600,000

$1,174,232

$0

$0

$488,446

$685,786

$425,104 $0 $20,760,544 $0

$3,019

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2038 $1,600,000

$1,196,428

$49,789

$0

$0

$1,146,639

$403,510 $0 $20,651,723 $0

$1,203

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap

Preventative

Maintenance

Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:

2 MTC StreetSaver
2039 $1,600,000

$1,191,221

$55,486

$0

$0

$1,135,735

$407,389 $0 $20,214,697 $0

$4,103

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

2040 $1,600,000

$1,186,066

$222,436

$4,311

$467,797

$491,522

$413,381 $0 $20,284,757 $0

$7,099

25%

$0

$0

II

III

IV

V

NonProject

Project

Funded

Unmet

Project

Total

Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap

Summary

Stop Gap

Funded Unmet

Arterial $3,142,547 $1,888,792 $0 $18,521

Collector $4,554,449 $2,137,944 $0 $113,784

Other $5,650,227 $1,570,013 $0 $291,190

Residential/Local $9,270,681 $651,172 $0 $139,756

Grand Total: $22,617,904 $6,247,921 $0 $563,251

Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap

Preventative

Maintenance

Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:

3 MTC StreetSaver
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM

2021 $0 0%

2022 $500,000 25%

2023 $500,000 25%

2024 $1,000,000 25%

2025 $1,600,000 23%

2026 $1,800,000 4%

2027 $1,900,000 5%

2028 $1,900,000 25%

2029 $1,900,000 19%

2030 $1,800,000 19%

2031 $1,800,000 25%

2032 $1,600,000 22%

2033 $1,500,000 25%

2034 $1,500,000 25%

2035 $1,600,000 25%

2036 $1,600,000 25%

2037 $1,600,000 25%

2038 $1,600,000 25%

2039 $1,600,000 25%

2040 $1,600,000 25%

Projected Network Average PCI by Year

With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline

Miles

Treated

Lane Miles

Year Never Treated

2021 66 71 6.79 13.35

2022 64 69 2.15 4.19

2023 61 67 1.88 3.56

2024 59 66 3.41 5.84

2025 56 66 4.34 7.27

2026 54 66 2.88 4.32

2027 51 66 2.81 4.66

2028 49 66 4.99 9.45

2029 46 66 5.38 9.26

2030 44 66 3.82 7.09

2031 41 66 4.70 8.40

2032 39 66 3.66 6.64

2033 36 66 3.21 5.24

2034 34 66 3.47 5.30

2035 31 66 3.45 6.88

2036 29 66 4.80 9.13

2037 27 66 3.20 6.31

2038 25 66 2.94 5.69

2039 23 66 3.17 5.60

2040 22 66 4.11 6.72

Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category

Condition in base year 2021, prior to applying treatments.

Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total

I 7.4% 7.8% 8.6% 18.3% 42.1%

II / III 9.7% 6.7% 8.5% 10.4% 35.3%

IV 0.4% 5.4% 5.0% 9.4% 20.2%

V 0.6% 0.4% 0.4% 1.0% 2.4%

Total 18.1% 20.3% 22.5% 39.1% 100.0%

Condition in year 2021 after schedulable treatments applied.

Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total

Scenarios - Network Condition Summary

Printed: 2/2/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Scenario: 2021 S4: Maintain at 66

Interest: 3% Inflation: 3%

Criteria: MTC StreetSaver

Scenarios Criteria:

1
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary

Printed: 2/2/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Scenario: 2021 S4: Maintain at 66

Interest: 3% Inflation: 3%

I 14.6% 10.5% 8.7% 19.5% 53.3%

II / III 3.3% 6.5% 9.5% 9.5% 28.8%

IV 0.2% 3.3% 3.9% 9.1% 16.5%

V 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 1.0% 1.4%

Total 18.1% 20.3% 22.5% 39.1% 100.0%

Condition

Condition in year 2040 after schedulable treatments applied.

Other

I 22.4%

II / III 6.1%

IV 0.8%

V 9.8%

Total

Arterial

14.5%

1.3%

2.1%

0.2%

18.1%

Collector

16.4%

0.2%

0.0%

3.7%

20.3%

Res/Loc

19.8%

2.3%

0.0%

0.4%

22.5% 39.1%

Total

73.1%

9.9%

2.9%

14.1%

100.0%

Criteria: MTC StreetSaver

Scenarios Criteria:

2
APPENDIX E 
PCI Maps 

 
Current Network Condition – 2021 

 
Current PCI Condition

Printed: 2/2/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Test

Feature Legend

Category I - Very Good

Category II - Good (Non-Load)

Category III - Good (Load)

Category IV - Poor

Category V - Very Poor
Scenario 1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50% 

Projected Street Network Condition – 2040 

 
Scenario PCI Condition

2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then Maintain - 2040 Project Period - Total Rehab for 2040: $937,013 - Printed: 2/2/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Test

Feature Legend

Category I - Very Good

Category II - Good (Non-Load)

Category III - Good (Load)

Category IV - Poor

Category V - Very Poor
Scenario 2: Average Annual Budget of $1.7 Million 

Projected Street Network Condition – 2040 

 
Scenario PCI Condition

2021 S2b: Average Annual Budget $1.7M/yr - 2021 Project Period - Total Rehab for 2021: $0 - Printed: 2/3/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Test

Feature Legend

Category I - Very Good

Category II - Good (Non-Load)

Category III - Good (Load)

Category IV - Poor

Category V - Very Poor
Scenario 3: Maintain PCI at 70 

Projected Street Network Condition – 2040 

 
Scenario PCI Condition

2021 S3: Maintain PCI at 70 - 2040 Project Period - Total Rehab for 2040: $1,196,347 - Printed: 2/2/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Test

Feature Legend

Category I - Very Good

Category II - Good (Non-Load)

Category III - Good (Load)

Category IV - Poor

Category V - Very Poor
Scenario 4: Maintain PCI at 66 

Projected Street Network Condition – 2040 
Scenario PCI Condition

2021 S4: Maintain at 66 - 2040 Project Period - Total Rehab for 2040: $1,186,066 - Printed: 2/2/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Test

Feature Legend

Category I - Very Good

Category II - Good (Non-Load)

Category III - Good (Load)

Category IV - Poor

Category V - Very Poor
APPENDIX F 

 
Sections Selected for Treatment 

Scenario 1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50% 

 
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM

2021 $1,000,000 25%

2022 $1,750,000 25%

2023 $2,800,000 24%

2024 $2,500,000 7%

2025 $2,500,000 0%

2026 $1,600,000 0%

2027 $1,200,000 7%

2028 $2,100,000 25%

2029 $2,250,000 25%

2030 $1,850,000 25%

2031 $1,900,000 25%

2032 $1,600,000 25%

2033 $1,400,000 25%

2034 $1,000,000 25%

2035 $1,600,000 25%

2036 $1,000,000 25%

2037 $3,000,000 25%

2038 $2,100,000 25%

2039 $1,250,000 25%

2040 $1,250,000 25%

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2021

BUILDING 87 PARKING RTE 445 GRAHAM MP - Main Post

ST

BLDG 85-87 900jP P1 210 40 8,400 O AC 74 75 83 $5,600 22,601 MICROSURFACING

**BUILDING 63 MP - Main Post

PARKING

RTE 448 FUNSTON

AVE

BLDG 63 900lP P1 1,630 40 65,225 O AC 65 65 75 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

**BUILDING 93 MP - Main Post

PARKING

RTE 443

MONTGOMERY

BLDG 93 900rP P1 537 40 21,494 O AC 56 57 68 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

**BUILDING 569/572

PARKING

RTE 685 RUGER

ST

BLDG 569/572 902pbP P1 310 40 12,422 O AC 55 55 67 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

**RAMSEL CT ARMISTEAD RD END 903bP 10 392 22 19,271 R AC FC - Fort Scott 54 54 66 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1575/1577

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1575-1577 906caP P1 331 15 4,969 O AC 79 79 87 $3,313 19,343 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

**DUDLEY RD PIPER LOOP END 906jP 10 377 13 7,166 R AC/AC 61 61 72 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1509

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1509 906xpP P1 140 16 2,249 O AC 88 88 94 $1,500 22,425 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 937 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 937 909dP P1 80 50 4,000 O AC 84 84 91 $2,667 27,688 MICROSURFACING

PF - Presidio

Forest

INSPIRATION POINT RTE 013

ARGUELLO BLVD

INSPIRATION

POINT

910bP P1 532 40 21,290 O AC 73 73 82 $14,194 17,768 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

**LINCOLN BLVD PERSHING DR

SOUTH

KOBBE AV FHA010 20 2,640 37 97,680 A AC 57 57 69 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

**LINCOLN BLVD LONG AVE LENDRUM CT FHA010 43 470 38 17,860 A AC FC - Fort Scott 54 54 66 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

**LINCOLN BLVD LENDRUM CT 101 OVERPASS FHA010 46 710 32 22,720 A AC FC - Fort Scott 77 77 85 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD 101 OVERPASS STOREY AVE FHA010 47 718 32 22,976 A AC FC - Fort Scott 84 84 91 $15,318 41,841 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

**LINCOLN BLVD STOREY PATTEN FHA010 50 1,760 28 49,280 A AC 55 55 67 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

PF - Presidio

Forest

ARGUELLO BLVD SOUTH PARK

ENTRANCE

WASHINGTON

BLVD

FHA013 10 1,160 46 53,360 A AC/AC 89 89 95 $35,574 38,701 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

**ARGUELLO BLVD WASHINGTON

BLVD

MORAGA AVE FHA013 30 2,048 28 68,544 A AC 76 76 85 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

**PRESIDIO BLVD SOUTH

ENTRANCE

LOMBARD ST FHA015 10 2,733 32 157,120 A AC 68 68 78 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 1 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2021

EH - East

Housing

MACARTHUR AVE PRESIDIO BLVD EL POLIN LOOP FHA016 10 2,323 27 66,986 C AC 76 76 84 $44,658 19,357 MICROSURFACING

PF - Presidio

Forest

**CENTRAL MAGAZINE

RD

WASHINGTON

BLVD

END FHA425 10 634 24 15,216 R AC 57 57 69 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

WEDEMEYER STREET S. 14TH AVE

ENTRANCE

BATTERY

CAULFIELD RD

FHA426 10 1,795 20 35,900 C AC 84 84 91 $23,934 28,846 MICROSURFACING

TAYLOR RD LINCOLN BLVD BLISS RD FHA442 10 1,162 18 20,916 R AC MP - Main Post 80 80 88 $13,944 23,214 MICROSURFACING

MONTGOMERY ST MORAGA AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA443 10 1,478 26 38,428 C AC/AC MP - Main Post 82 82 90 $25,619 26,604 MICROSURFACING

**BARNARD AVE PRESIDIO BLVD HICKS PARKING FHA450 10 1,426 20 28,520 R AC MP - Main Post 46 46 61 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GORGAS AVE KENDALL DR GIRARD RD FHA455 20 302 50 15,100 C AC 85 85 92 $10,067 18,693 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GEN KENNEDY AVE EDIE ROAD BIRMINGHAM

PARKING

FHA458 30 200 34 6,800 R AC/AC 79 79 87 $4,534 25,300 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

**MASON ST HALLECK ST MCDOWELL AVE FHA602 20 3,850 38 146,300 A AC 65 65 75 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

MASON ST MCDOWELL AVE END PARKING

LOT

FHA602 30 1,225 40 49,000 A AC 75 75 84 $32,667 25,972 MICROSURFACING

OWEN ST GRAHAM ST ANZA ST FHA6145 10 142 26 3,692 R AC MP - Main Post 74 74 83 $2,462 17,722 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

**PIPER LOOP DEEMS RD DUDLEY RD FHA615 20 550 16 17,744 R AC/AC 86 86 93 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

PIPER LOOP DUDLEY RD END FHA615 30 559 20 11,180 R AC/AC 84 84 91 $7,454 28,249 MICROSURFACING

ROD RD STOREY AVE FC - Fort Scott

NORTH

STOREY AVE

SOUTH

FHA617 10 422 16 9,268 R AC 84 84 91 $6,179 21,283 MICROSURFACING

**ARMISTEAD RD LINCOLN BLVD LENDRUM CT FHA649 10 1,162 24 36,892 R AC FC - Fort Scott 31 31 54 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

**LENDRUM CT LINCOLN BLVD END FHA650 10 792 19 17,804 R AC FC - Fort Scott 30 30 53 $0 0 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

ANZA TRAIL SPUR WEDEMEYER AVE WEDEMEYER

PARKING

FHA708 10 80 6 480 O AC 84 84 91 $320 13,144 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $250,004

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 558 PARKING RTE 015 PRESIDIO

BLVD

BLDG 558 901dP P1 250 40 10,000 O AC 69 69 78 $11,667 11,037 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

BUILDING 777 PARKING RTE 674 MORTON

ST

BLDG 777 902iaP P1 132 40 5,291 O AC 68 68 78 $6,173 10,025 CAPE SEAL

LOT D PARKING LINCOLN RALSTON AND FC - Fort Scott

BLDG 1369

903wP P1 400 135 54,000 O AC 61 62 72 $63,000 11,055 CAPE SEAL

PRESIDIO BLVD LETTERMAN DR MESA ST FHA015 25 1,436 33 47,388 A AC MP - Main Post 63 63 73 $68,450 11,299 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

LOMBARD ST PRESIDIO BLVD LETTERMAN FHA438 10 689 32 22,048 A AC/AC 67 67 77 $31,848 15,985 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

PRESIDIO

PROMENADE

LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR FHA700 10 1,300 9 11,700 O AC 62 63 73 $13,650 10,256 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $194,788

SAL ST GRAHAM ST KEYES AVE 900sP 10 124 29 3,596 R AC MP - Main Post 42 42 100 $16,782 10,774 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 2 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2021

BUILDING 951 PARKING RTE 652 FC - Fort Scott

HOFFMAN ST

BLDG 951 903aP P1 286 40 11,453 O AC 42 42 100 $53,448 10,770 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1416

PARKING

RTE 012

WASHINGTON

BLVD

BLDG 1416 906fbP P1 86 40 3,431 O AC 49 49 100 $16,012 10,244 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

CS - Cavalry

Stables

COWLES ST LINCOLN BLVD MCDOWELL AVE FHA655 10 640 20 12,800 R AC 42 42 100 $59,734 10,771 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

MCRAE ST PORTOLA ST

SOUTH

PORTOLA ST

NORTH

FHA672 10 686 12 14,049 R AC 43 43 100 $65,562 10,714 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

BROADWAY GATE

CONNECTION

BROADWAY AND

LYON ST

PRESIDIO BLVD FHA706 10 475 12 5,700 O AC 41 41 100 $26,600 10,844 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $238,138

**LINCOLN BLVD MONTGOMERY ST PRESIDIO BLVD FHA010 80 1,900 40 76,000 A AC MP - Main Post 94 94 100 $0 0 MILL & OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

**PRESIDIO BLVD LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR FHA015 15 660 33 21,780 A AC/AC 63 63 100 $0 0 MILL & OVERLAY

**HALLECK ST LINCOLN BLVD FRENCH CT FHA452 10 415 38 15,770 C AC MP - Main Post 58 58 100 $0 0 MILL & OVERLAY

LC - Letterman

Complex

**GORGAS AVE EAST ENTRANCE KENDALL DR FHA455 10 1,262 50 63,100 C AC 33 33 100 $0 0 MILL & OVERLAY

CF - Crissy

Field

**CRISSY FIELD AVE MCDOWELL AVE LINCOLN BLVD

WEST

FHA654 40 986 20 19,720 O AC/PCC 39 39 100 $0 0 MILL & OVERLAY

Treatment Total $0

LO - Lobos

Creek

**LINCOLN BLVD WEST ENTRANCE PERSHING DR

SOUTH

FHA010 10 2,165 42 90,930 A AC 59 59 100 $0 0 CIR w/ OVERLAY

**LINCOLN BLVD MERCHANT/STOR FC - Fort Scott

EY

GG BRIDGE

PLAZA

ENTRANCE

FHA010 35 1,145 38 43,510 A AC 22 22 100 $0 0 CIR w/ OVERLAY

**LINCOLN BLVD GG BRIDGE FC - Fort Scott

PLAZA ENTRANCE

LONG AVE FHA010 42 1,080 38 41,040 A AC 54 54 100 $0 0 CIR w/ OVERLAY

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG. 401 DEEMS FHA012 70 1,820 30 54,600 C AC 43 43 100 $291,200 10,981 CIR w/ OVERLAY

**SHERIDAN AVE RILEY AVE GRAHAM ST FHA437 20 963 31 29,853 C AC MP - Main Post 16 16 100 $0 0 CIR w/ OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

**LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR LYON ST FHA438 20 578 32 18,496 A AC/AC 39 39 100 $0 0 CIR w/ OVERLAY

**GRAHAM ST LINCOLN BLVD MORAGA AVE FHA445 10 1,637 32 52,384 C AC MP - Main Post 39 39 100 $0 0 CIR w/ OVERLAY

RUCKMAN AVE RALSTON AVE UPTON FHA642 10 200 24 4,800 C AC FC - Fort Scott 41 41 100 $25,600 11,056 CIR w/ OVERLAY

CS - Cavalry

Stables

**MCDOWELL AVE Lincoln Blvd Cowles St FHA657 10 748 32 23,936 C AC 27 27 100 $0 0 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Treatment Total $316,800

**FRENCH CT GRAHAM ST HALLECK ST FHA453 10 C AC MP - Main Post $0 0 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

305 24 7,320 42 43 100

Treatment Total $0

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 3 MTC StreetSaver
Year 2021 Area Total 1,940,947 Year 2021 Total $999,730

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2022

TAYLOR ROAD MP - Main Post

PARKING

RTE 442, TAYLOR

RD

BLDG 116 900hP P1 992 40 39,685 O AC 78 77 85 $27,251 16,849 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 38 PARKING MESA ST BUILDING 38 900kbP P1 205 25 5,125 O AC MP - Main Post 84 83 90 $3,520 13,999 MICROSURFACING

FITNESS PARKING RTE 015 PRESIDIO MP - Main Post

BLVD

END 900mP P1 315 60 18,900 O AC 86 85 92 $12,978 19,459 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 50 PARKING RTE 013 MP - Main Post

ARGUELLO BLVD

BLDG 50 900tP P1 52 50 2,600 O AC 84 83 90 $1,786 18,987 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 67 PARKING RTE 454 MP - Main Post

MARTINEZ AVE

BLDG 67 900wP P1 215 40 8,600 O AC 81 80 87 $5,906 15,850 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

LOMBARD ST PULLOUT PARKINGRTE 438

LOMBARD ST

EAST

ENTRANCE

901bP P1 69 40 2,756 O AC 84 83 90 $1,893 14,128 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1028

SERVICE

RTE 458 GIRARD

RD

BLDG 1028 901hP P1 516 16 8,255 O AC 77 76 84 $5,669 17,023 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

BUILDING 808/809

PARKING

RTE 451

FERNANDEZ ST

BLDG 808 902jP P1 93 40 3,708 O AC 75 74 82 $2,547 17,219 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1449/1450

PARKING

RTE 603 BATTERY

CAULFIELD

BLDG 1449 906ecP P1 44 30 1,330 O AC 84 83 90 $914 14,122 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 300 PARKING ARGUELLO END 906kP P1 1,916 24 45,984 O AC 77 76 84 $31,576 17,011 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1515

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1515 906xjP P1 106 16 1,702 O AC 75 74 82 $1,169 17,473 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1511

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1511 906xmP P1 273 16 4,370 O AC 74 73 81 $3,001 17,279 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 1183-85

PARKING

EAST OF

MARSHALL

BLDG 1184 AND

1185

909mP P1 2,014 40 80,550 O AC 77 76 84 $55,311 17,023 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD KOBBE AVE MERCHANT/STO FC - Fort Scott

REY

FHA010 30 2,335 32 74,720 A AC/AC 88 86 93 $51,308 22,062 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

LINCOLN BLVD PATTEN SHERIDAN AV FHA010 60 1,060 26 27,560 A AC 88 86 92 $18,925 22,215 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

PORTOLA ST MACARTHUR AVE END FHA017 10 1,795 26 48,465 R AC 73 72 81 $33,280 17,254 MICROSURFACING

KEYES AVE PENA ST CANBY ST FHA446 30 782 26 34,320 R AC MP - Main Post 80 79 87 $23,567 16,290 MICROSURFACING

MARTINEZ ST FUNSTON AVE PRESIDIO BLVD FHA454 10 686 12 8,232 R AC MP - Main Post 75 74 82 $5,653 17,219 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GIRARD RD EDIE RD GORGAS AVE FHA456 20 454 28 12,712 A AC 85 84 91 $8,729 32,721 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GEN KENNEDY AVE TORNEY AVE EDIE ROAD FHA458 20 592 34 20,128 R AC 76 75 83 $13,822 17,171 MICROSURFACING

RILEY AVE SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA616 10 422 18 7,596 R AC MP - Main Post 83 82 89 $5,216 14,779 MICROSURFACING

HARRISON BLVD WASHINGTON FC - Fort Scott

BLVD

KOBBE AVE FHA636 10 581 24 13,944 R AC/AC 84 83 90 $9,575 17,171 MICROSURFACING

HITCHCOCK ST PARK BLVD HARRISON BLVD FHA638 10 2,640 18 49,028 R AC FC - Fort Scott 76 75 83 $33,666 17,170 MICROSURFACING

THOMAS AVE INFANTRY MP - Main Post

TERRACE

ARGUELLO

BLVD

FHA669 10 1,373 14 19,222 R AC 74 73 81 $13,200 17,278 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 4 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2022

EH - East

Housing

LIGGETT AVE PRESIDIO BLVD END OF LOOP FHA675 10 1,637 20 32,740 R AC 78 77 85 $22,482 16,856 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

CLARK ST LIGGETT AVE

LOOP

LIGGETT AVE FHA677 10 845 15 12,675 R AC 80 79 87 $8,704 16,276 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

RUGER ST SIMONDS LOOP LOMBARD ST FHA685 10 1,395 29 41,884 R AC 73 72 81 $28,761 17,254 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

ANZA TRAIL 14TH AVE WEDEMEYER ST FHA703 10 1,200 8 9,600 O AC 78 77 85 $6,592 16,852 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

ANZA TRAIL SPUR WEDEMEYER AVE WEDEMEYER

PARKING

FHA708 20 200 6 1,200 O AC 84 83 90 $824 14,119 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $437,825

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1016

PARKING

LINCOLN BLVD

NORTH

TORNEY AVE 901kP P1 260 16 4,160 O AC 69 68 77 $4,999 9,722 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

SIBLEY ROAD PARKING RTE 676 SIBLEY

RD

BLDG 790-791 902mP P1 117 40 4,673 O AC 68 67 76 $5,616 9,626 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $10,615

LO - Lobos

Creek

BUILDING 1752

PARKING

RTE 010 LINCOLN

W. ENTRANCE

BLDG 1752 908bN P1 615 40 24,625 O AC 43 41 100 $118,365 10,531 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

PS - Presidio

Hill

PARK TR 14TH AVE ENT W. PACIFIC AVE FHA011 10 1,320 22 30,360 O AC 42 40 100 $145,931 10,573 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $264,296

LINCOLN BLVD LONG AVE LENDRUM CT FHA010 43 470 38 17,860 A AC FC - Fort Scott 54 64 100 $59,276 19,572 1.5 INCH OVERLAY

CS - Cavalry

Stables

LINCOLN BLVD STOREY PATTEN FHA010 50 1,760 28 49,280 A AC 55 65 100 $163,555 19,306 1.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $222,831

UPTON AVE RALSTON AVE STOREY AVE FHA620 20 1,478 45 66,510 C AC FC - Fort Scott 45 41 100 $365,362 10,744 CIR w/ OVERLAY

RALSTON AVE STOREY AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA627 10 3,168 25 81,626 C AC FC - Fort Scott 46 42 100 $448,399 10,705 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Treatment Total $813,761

Year 2022 Area Total 916,685 Year 2022 Total $1,749,328

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2023

LC - Letterman

Complex

GIRARD RD LINCOLN BLVD EDIE RD 45 10 581 45 26,145 A AC 94 88 94 $18,492 19,259 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 610 WEST

PARKING

RTE 602 MASON

ST

BLDG 610 900aP P1 1,074 41 44,034 O AC 80 77 85 $31,144 16,263 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 5 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2023

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 610 EAST

PARKING

RTE 602 MASON

ST

BLDG 610 900bP P1 500 210 105,000 O AC 81 78 86 $74,263 15,994 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 130 PARKING RTE 441 FISHER MP - Main Post

LOOP

BLDG 130 900pP P1 586 40 23,442 O AC 86 83 90 $16,580 13,457 MICROSURFACING

HARDIE AVE PARKING FUNSTON AVE BLDG 50 900uP P1 562 40 22,484 O AC MP - Main Post 93 89 94 $15,903 7,574 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1027

PARKING

RTE 607 EDIE RD BLDG 1027 901iP P1 91 40 3,633 O AC 90 87 93 $2,570 10,197 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GENERAL KENNEDY

PARKING

GENERAL

KENNEDY AVE

O'REILLY AVE 901lP P1 107 100 10,700 O AC 89 86 92 $7,568 11,081 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1160

PARKING

RTE 455 GORGAS

AVE

BLDG 1160 901pP P1 127 40 5,098 O AC 94 89 94 $3,606 7,292 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1062

PARKING

RTE 459

THORNBURG RD

BIRMINGHAM

RD

901sP P1 262 40 10,469 O AC 94 89 94 $7,405 7,292 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 1331 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 623 KOBBE

AVE NORTHSIDE

TENNIS

OVERLOOK 1331

903qaP P1 467 40 18,695 O AC 94 89 94 $13,223 7,277 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1567-73 ODD

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1567-1573 906ccP P1 416 15 6,243 O AC 95 89 95 $4,416 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1552-58

EVEN PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1552-1558 906cdP P1 333 15 5,003 O AC 95 89 95 $3,539 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING

1582/84/61/63/65 PARK

STILLWELL RD PERSHING DR 906ceP P1 865 15 12,978 O AC 95 89 95 $9,179 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1546-50

EVEN PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1548 906cfP P1 309 15 4,640 O AC 95 89 95 $3,282 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1555-59 ODD

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1555 906cgP P1 299 15 4,990 O AC 95 89 95 $3,530 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1530-44

EVEN PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG

1534/1542/1544

906chP P1 913 15 13,703 O AC 95 89 95 $9,692 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1549

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1551 906ciP P1 245 15 3,678 O AC 95 89 95 $2,602 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING

1528/1545/1547PARKIN

G

PERSHING DR BLDG 1547 906cjP P1 487 15 7,317 O AC 95 89 95 $5,176 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1535-43 ODD

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1535-1543 906xaP P1 896 16 14,342 O AC 95 89 95 $10,144 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1533

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1533 906xbP P1 151 16 2,431 O AC 95 89 95 $1,720 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1524/1526

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1524-1526 906xcP P1 226 16 3,620 O AC 94 89 94 $2,561 9,734 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1520

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1520 906xeP P1 274 16 4,398 O AC 95 89 95 $3,111 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1525

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1525 906xfP P1 107 16 1,726 O AC 95 89 95 $1,221 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1518/1580

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1518/1580 906xgP P1 190 16 3,050 O AC 95 89 95 $2,158 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1517/1519

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1517-1519 906xiP P1 279 16 4,472 O AC 95 89 95 $3,163 9,106 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 6 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2023

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1510-14

EVEN PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1510-1514 906xkP P1 392 16 6,272 O AC 95 89 95 $4,436 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1506/1508

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1506-1508 906xnP P1 244 16 3,910 O AC 95 89 95 $2,766 9,112 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1504

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1504 906xqP P1 156 16 2,501 O AC 95 89 95 $1,769 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1503-7 ODD

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1503-1507 906xrP P1 627 16 10,035 O AC 95 89 95 $7,098 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1502

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1502 906xsP P1 117 16 1,887 O AC 95 89 95 $1,335 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1501

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1501 906xtP P1 127 16 2,045 O AC 95 89 95 $1,447 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1591

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1591 906yaP P1 311 15 4,672 O AC 94 89 94 $3,305 9,734 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1592/1594

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1592/1594 906ybP P1 183 15 2,748 O AC 95 89 95 $1,944 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1587/1589

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1587/1589 906ycP P1 314 15 4,717 O AC 95 89 95 $3,337 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1588/1590

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1588/1590 906ydP P1 408 15 6,120 O AC 95 89 95 $4,329 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1583/1585

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1583/1585 906yeP P1 257 15 3,861 O AC 95 89 95 $2,731 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1586

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1586 906yfP P1 106 15 1,594 O AC 95 89 95 $1,128 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING

1516/1578/1580PARKIN

G

STILLWELL RD BLDG

1516/1578/1580

906ygP P1 467 15 7,007 O AC 95 89 95 $4,956 9,106 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

BUILDING 1801

PARKING

WEDEMEYER ST BLDG 1801 907aaP P1 1,611 24 38,664 O AC 94 89 94 $27,346 8,805 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

BUILDING 1808 SOUTH

PARKING

RTE 428

WEDEMEYER ST

BLDG 1808 907abP P2 771 40 30,843 O AC 92 88 94 $21,815 8,518 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

WEDEMEYER PARKING RTE 428

WEDEMEYER ST

END 907acP P1 988 35 34,580 O AC 90 87 93 $24,458 9,988 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

BUILDING 1818/1819

PARKING

RTE 428

WEDEMEYER ST

BLDG 1818 907cP P1 309 17 5,256 O AC 94 89 94 $3,718 7,270 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

BUILDING 1808 NORTH

PARKING

RTE 428

WEDEMEYER ST

END (N/O BLDG

1808)

907dP P1 186 60 11,160 O AC 94 89 94 $7,894 8,808 MICROSURFACING

BA - Baker

Beach

BUILDING 1770-1781

PARKING

RTE 684 GIBSON

RD

BLDG 1781 908cP P1 862 29 25,019 O AC 84 81 89 $17,696 14,714 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

PALACE OF FINE ART

PARKING

PALACE DRIVE PALACE DRIVE 909aP P1 2,033 40 81,350 O AC 81 78 86 $57,537 15,995 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 1188

PARKING

RTE 464 LUNDEEN

ST

EAST

BOUNDARY

909bP P1 302 40 12,081 O AC 84 81 89 $8,545 14,735 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 924/926

PARKING

MASON ST BLDG 924/926 909kP P1 183 60 11,005 O AC 84 81 89 $7,784 14,733 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD WEST COMPTON EAST COMPTON FHA012 40 1,300 30 39,000 C AC/AC 88 86 92 $27,584 25,601 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 7 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2023

PS - Presidio

Hill

BATTERY CAULFIELD

RD

WASHINGTON

BLVD

BLDG 1450 FHA603 10 412 24 9,888 C AC/AC 86 84 91 $6,994 24,685 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BROOKS ST LINCOLN BLVD END PARKING FHA626 10 724 40 37,031 R AC/AC 94 89 95 $26,191 7,533 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BAKER CT BROOK ST END PARKING FHA626 20 241 40 16,243 R AC/AC 94 89 95 $11,489 7,533 MICROSURFACING

STOREY AVE LINCOLN BLVD FC - Fort Scott

WEST

RALSTON EAST FHA628 10 845 23 19,435 C AC/AC 93 88 94 $13,746 13,570 MICROSURFACING

STOREY AVE RUCKMAN LINCOLN BLVD FC - Fort Scott

EAST

FHA628 30 844 23 19,412 C AC/AC 93 88 94 $13,730 13,570 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

N 15TH AVE SOUTH

BOUNDARY

WEDEMEYER ST FHA630 10 317 22 6,974 C AC/AC 93 88 94 $4,933 11,555 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

HAYS ST WEDEMEYER ST BROWN ST FHA631 10 572 17 9,724 R AC 94 89 94 $6,878 8,805 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

BROWN ST WYMAN AVE HAYS ST FHA634 10 219 18 3,942 R AC 92 88 94 $2,789 10,029 MICROSURFACING

RUCKMAN AVE UPTON STOREY FHA642 20 645 24 15,480 C AC/AC FC - Fort Scott 93 88 94 $10,949 13,513 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

PATTEN ST MCDOWELL AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA656 10 792 16 12,672 O AC 94 89 94 $8,963 7,238 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

MCDOWELL AVE Cowles St Mason St FHA657 20 807 32 25,824 C AC 89 86 92 $18,265 23,994 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

NAUMAN RD WASHINGTON

BLVD

END FHA665 10 1,214 12 14,568 R AC/AC 92 88 94 $10,304 10,460 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

PRESIDIO

PROMENADE

LINCOLN BLVD LINCOLN BLVD FHA700 40 1,310 13 17,030 O AC 94 89 94 $12,045 7,024 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

PRESIDIO

PROMENADE

MCDOWELL AVE LONG AVE FHA700 60 2,170 10 21,700 O AC 94 89 94 $15,348 7,024 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

PATH O'REILLY AVE GENERAL

KENNEDY

PARKING

FHA702 10 300 10 3,000 O AC 94 89 94 $2,122 7,230 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

PAUL GOOD FIELD

ACCESS

PORTOLA ST TRAIL FHA709 10 150 12 1,800 O AC 95 89 95 $1,274 6,660 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $667,226

EH - East

Housing

BUILDING 779 PARKING RTE 674 MORTON

ST

BLDG 779 902ibP P1 63 40 2,508 O AC 72 69 78 $3,105 9,489 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $3,105

MAINTENANCE AREA FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 627 RALSTON

AVE

BLDG 1355 903jP P1 2,530 40 101,203 O AC 45 41 100 $501,043 10,239 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

BUILDING 1228/1230 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 627 RALSTON

AVE

RTE 620 UPTON

AVE FROM

STOREY

903kP P1 1,841 40 73,673 O AC 47 43 100 $364,746 10,123 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

CS - Cavalry

Stables

BUILDING 682 PARKING PARK BLVD BLDG 682 905cP P1 415 40 16,600 O AC 46 42 100 $82,185 10,169 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 8 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2023

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1440-1443

PARKING

RTE 603 BATTERY

CAULFIELD

BLDG 1440-1443 906ebP P1 195 40 7,825 O AC 46 42 100 $38,741 10,182 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

LC - Letterman

Complex

EDIE RD GIRARD RD OREILLY AVE FHA607 10 810 24 19,440 R AC 47 43 100 $96,245 10,124 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

BATTERY WAGNER RD STOREY AVENUE STOREY FC - Fort Scott

AVENUE

FHA646 10 739 30 27,416 R AC 46 42 100 $135,733 10,181 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

MORTON ST RODRIQUEZ ST LIGGETT AVE FHA674 10 739 18 13,302 R AC 48 44 100 $65,857 10,058 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

SUMNER AVE PRESIDIO BLVD MACARTHUR

AVE

FHA680 10 1,584 16 25,344 R AC 47 43 100 $125,475 10,124 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $1,410,025

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD IMMIGRANT POINT

OVERLOOK

WEST

COMPTON

FHA012 31 890 30 26,700 C AC 72 67 100 $84,979 14,883 1.5 INCH OVERLAY

FUNSTON AVE MORAGA AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA448 10 1,637 32 52,384 C AC MP - Main Post 73 68 100 $166,723 14,613 1.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $251,702

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD DEEMS ARGUELLO FHA012 80 970 32 31,040 C AC 56 49 100 $175,629 10,067 CIR w/ OVERLAY

PS - Presidio

Hill

WEST PACIFIC AVE GATE ARGEULLO

BLVD

FHA014 020 1,305 24 31,320 C AC 51 43 100 $177,213 10,349 CIR w/ OVERLAY

STOREY AVE RALSTON EAST RUCKMAN FHA628 20 845 23 19,435 C AC FC - Fort Scott 52 44 100 $109,966 10,297 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Treatment Total $462,808

Year 2023 Area Total 1,391,531 Year 2023 Total $2,794,866

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2024

BUILDING 210 PARKING LINCOLN BLVD BLDG 210 (POST MP - Main Post

OFFICE/VISITOR'

S CENTER)

900gP P1 353 40 14,105 O AC 96 88 93 $10,276 8,580 MICROSURFACING

ANZA PARKING ANZA AVE MIDDLE ANZA AVE MP - Main Post

NORTH

900zP P1 342 108 36,936 O AC 96 88 93 $26,908 10,965 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1163/67/69/70

PARKING

RTE 455 GORGAS

AVE

BLDGS 1167-

1170

901qP P1 1,552 40 62,071 O AC 94 87 93 $45,218 9,033 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1029

PARKING

RTE 458 GIRARD

RD

BLDG 1029 901vP P1 2,028 40 81,131 O AC 95 88 93 $59,103 8,768 MICROSURFACING

PF - Presidio

Forest

WASHINGTON BLVD LINCOLN BLVD KOBBE AVE FHA012 10 480 32 15,360 C AC 94 88 94 $11,190 14,806 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

OREILLY AVE EDIE ROAD GORGAS AVE FHA614 20 155 21 3,255 C AC 94 88 94 $2,372 17,318 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 9 MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $155,067

EH - East

Housing

GIBBON CT SIMONDS LOOP END 902aP 10 314 17 5,202 R AC 72 67 77 $6,632 9,125 CAPE SEAL

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1521

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1521 906xhP P1 64 16 1,037 O AC 65 60 71 $1,637 7,839 CAPE SEAL

BATTERY SAFFOLD RD KOBBE AVE. BLDG 1351 PT701 10 265 14 3,710 R AC FC - Fort Scott 69 63 73 $4,730 8,844 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $12,999

BUILDING 220 PARKING RTE 452 HALLECK MP - Main Post

ST

BLDG 220 900fP P2 760 40 30,400 O AC 53 47 100 $155,022 9,597 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

BUILDING 385 PARKING RTE 449 MORAGA MP - Main Post

AVE

BLDG 387 900qP P1 637 40 25,488 O AC 48 42 100 $129,974 9,894 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

LC - Letterman

Complex

TORNEY PARKING RTE 457 TORNEY

AVE

RTE 010

LINCOLN BLVD

901faP P1 252 40 10,069 O AC 52 46 100 $51,346 9,687 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

WOOL CT UPTON AVE END 903rP 10 279 31 14,283 R AC FC - Fort Scott 51 45 100 $72,835 9,752 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

LO - Lobos

Creek

BUILDING 1750

PARKING

RTE 010 LINCOLN

W. ENTRANCE

BLDG 1750 908aP P1 1,973 40 78,930 O AC 51 45 100 $402,496 9,751 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 649-51

PARKING

MASSON ST BLDG 649-651 909fP P1 565 40 22,580 O AC 54 48 100 $115,145 9,538 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

LC - Letterman

Complex

THORNBURG RD THORNBURG

PARKING

GENERAL

KENNEDY AVE

FHA459 10 475 31 14,725 R AC 52 46 100 $75,089 9,687 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

LENDRUM CT LINCOLN BLVD END FHA650 10 792 19 17,804 R AC FC - Fort Scott 30 47 100 $90,790 9,537 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

SIBLEY RD LIGGETT AVE

LOOP

MORTON ST FHA676 10 1,267 11 13,937 R AC 49 43 100 $71,071 9,835 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

VISTA CT LIGGETT AVE END FHA678 10 264 22 5,808 R AC 51 45 100 $29,618 9,754 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

PRESIDIO

PROMENADE

LETTERMAN DR LETTERMAN DR FHA700 20 320 9 2,880 O AC 54 48 100 $14,687 9,540 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $1,208,073

CF - Crissy

Field

MASON ST HALLECK ST MCDOWELL AVE FHA602 20 3,850 38 146,300 A AC 65 68 100 $515,124 16,892 1.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $515,124

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD PARK BLVD. BLDG. 401 FHA012 60 400 30 12,000 C AC 57 46 100 $69,935 9,919 CIR w/ OVERLAY

LC - Letterman

Complex

LETTERMAN DR PRESIDIO BLVD LOMBARD ST FHA436 10 1,320 28 37,719 C AC/AC 52 44 100 $219,822 9,824 CIR w/ OVERLAY

SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD RILEY AVE FHA437 10 315 31 9,765 C AC MP - Main Post 57 46 100 $56,910 9,919 CIR w/ OVERLAY

HALLECK ST FRENCH CT MASON ST FHA452 20 730 38 27,740 C AC MP - Main Post 58 47 100 $161,666 9,863 CIR w/ OVERLAY

INFANTRY TERRACE SHERIDAN AVE MORAGA FHA668 10 600 23 13,800 C AC MP - Main Post 58 47 100 $80,425 9,865 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Treatment Total $588,758

Year 2024 Area Total 707,035 Year 2024 Total $2,480,021

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 10 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2025

BUILDING 135 WEST MP - Main Post

PARKING

RTE 441 FISHER

LOOP

BLDG 135 900oP P2 431 40 17,260 O AC 69 62 73 $22,664 8,543 CAPE SEAL

BUILDING 218 PARKING GRAHAM ST BLDG 218 900yP P1 96 65 6,240 O AC MP - Main Post 71 65 74 $8,194 8,691 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1028

PARKING

RTE 607 EDIE RD BLDG 1028 901gP P1 1,696 40 67,835 O AC 72 66 75 $89,074 8,754 CAPE SEAL

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1513

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1513 906xlP P1 211 16 3,387 O AC 67 60 71 $5,507 7,632 CAPE SEAL

PS - Presidio

Hill

PARK BLVD WASHINGTON

BLVD

LINCOLN BLVD FHA011 30 2,695 39 105,105 C AC 72 61 71 $144,585 7,313 CAPE SEAL

FISHER LOOP SHERIDAN AVE END OF LOOP FHA441 10 1,923 20 38,478 R AC MP - Main Post 71 65 74 $62,556 7,017 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

KENDALL DR EDIE RD GORGAS AVE FHA460 10 370 20 7,400 R AC 70 63 73 $12,031 6,955 CAPE SEAL

INFANTRY TERRACE MORAGA ARGUELLO FHA668 20 2,146 23 49,358 C AC MP - Main Post 73 62 72 $67,898 7,462 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

WALLEN ST MACARTHUR AVE END FHA671 10 264 20 10,769 R AC 72 66 75 $14,141 8,754 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

RODRIGUEZ ST PORTOLA ST

SOUTH

PORTOLA ST

NORTH

FHA673 10 1,267 18 23,885 R AC 71 64 74 $38,831 7,016 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

SIMONDS LOOP PRESIDIO BLVD

SOUTH

PRESIDIO BLVD

NORTH

FHA679 10 2,693 26 79,048 R AC 67 60 71 $103,798 8,391 CAPE SEAL

BA - Baker

Beach

BOWLEY ST LINCOLN BLVD

NORTH

LINVOLN BLVD

SOUTH

FHA690 10 1,455 35 50,925 R AC 67 60 71 $82,791 6,789 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $652,070

BUILDING 211 PARKING RTE 452 HALLECK MP - Main Post

ST

BLDG 211 900fP P1 834 40 33,360 O AC 57 49 100 $175,220 9,181 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

BUILDING 381-2 MP - Main Post

PARKING

RTE 669 THOMAS

AVE

BLDG 381-382 900vP P1 216 40 8,646 O AC 55 47 100 $45,413 9,339 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

LC - Letterman

Complex

BIRMINGHAM RD GEN KENNEDY

AVE

GORGAS AVE 901tN 10 271 18 4,878 R AC 55 47 100 $25,622 9,340 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1060

PARKING

RTE 455 GORGAS

AVE

BLDG 1062 901tP P1 731 40 29,258 O AC 56 48 100 $153,674 9,263 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

STONE ST LINCOLN BLVD STOREY AVE 903gP 10 227 19 4,313 R AC FC - Fort Scott 56 48 100 $22,654 9,260 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

BUILDING 1206/1207 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 627 RALSTON

AVE

BLDG 1206/1207 903hbP P1 80 40 3,224 O AC 54 46 100 $16,934 9,411 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1527/1529

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1527-1529 906xdP P1 110 16 1,766 O AC 56 48 100 $9,276 9,261 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

CANBY ST KEYES ST MESA ST FHA605 10 158 24 3,792 R AC/AC MP - Main Post 54 47 100 $19,918 9,245 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

LC - Letterman

Complex

OREILLY AVE TORNEY AVE EDIE RD FHA614 10 581 16 9,296 R AC 55 47 100 $48,827 9,340 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

WRIGHT LOOP HITCHCOCK ST END OF LOOP FHA621 10 1,320 15 22,311 R AC FC - Fort Scott 56 48 100 $117,186 9,262 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

PS - Presidio

Hill

PERSHING DR LINCOLN BLVD

SOUTH

LINCOLN BLVD

NORTH

FHA624 10 2,733 32 87,440 R AC 56 48 100 $459,268 9,261 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

ARMISTEAD RD LINCOLN BLVD LENDRUM CT FHA649 10 1,162 24 36,892 R AC FC - Fort Scott 31 46 100 $193,771 9,378 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 11 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2025

SIBERT LOOP THOMAS AVE MP - Main Post

WEST

THOMAS AVE

EAST

FHA670 10 898 10 8,980 R AC 57 49 100 $47,167 9,180 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $1,334,930

PS - Presidio

Hill

WEST PACIFIC AVE ARGUELLO BLVD PRESIDIO BLVD FHA014 030 3,512 24 84,290 C AC 62 48 100 $505,972 9,525 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Treatment Total $505,972

Year 2025 Area Total 798,136 Year 2025 Total $2,492,972

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2026

EH - East

Housing

GARDENER PARKING RUGER RUGER 902rP P1 770 22 16,940 O AC 58 48 100 $91,645 8,993 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

STONE ST PARKING RTE 010 LINCOLN FC - Fort Scott

AVE

RTE 628

STOREY ST

903gP P1 314 40 12,566 O AC 58 48 100 $67,982 8,990 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1418/1420

PARKING

RTE 012

WASHINGTON

BLVD

BLDG 1418/1420 906faP P1 70 40 2,812 O AC 59 49 100 $15,213 8,910 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1414

PARKING

RTE 012

WASHINGTON

BLVD

BLDG 1414 906fcP P1 60 40 2,415 O AC 59 49 100 $13,066 8,910 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

MESA ST LINCOLN BLVD CANBY ST FHA447 20 538 34 18,292 R AC/AC MP - Main Post 59 49 100 $98,959 8,923 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

LC - Letterman

Complex

TORNEY AVE LINCOLN BLVD OREILLY AVE FHA457 10 528 16 13,666 R AC 58 48 100 $73,933 8,993 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

PF - Presidio

Forest

COMPTON RD WASHINGTON

BLVD WEST

WASHINGTON

BLVD EAST

FHA629 10 1,250 24 29,995 R AC 58 48 100 $162,273 8,992 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

SANCHES ST MORTON ST PARKING FHA681 10 422 22 22,900 R AC 58 48 100 $123,888 8,993 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

SHAFTER RD WEST END EAST END FHA682 10 1,027 14 14,378 O AC 59 49 100 $77,785 8,906 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

LOVERS' LANE PRESIDIO GATE PRESIDIO BLVD FHA701 10 3,100 6 18,600 O AC 58 48 100 $100,625 8,980 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $825,369

ANZA ST SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA444 10 1,162 28 32,536 R AC MP - Main Post 28 12 100 $310,127 5,177 RECONSTRUCT or FDR

ORD ST RILEY AVE SHERIDAN AVE FHA613 10 475 18 8,550 R AC MP - Main Post 25 9 100 $81,497 5,177 RECONSTRUCT or FDR

BA - Baker

Beach

GIBSON RD BOWLEY ST WATER PLANT FHA684 10 528 20 10,560 R AC 27 11 100 $100,656 5,177 RECONSTRUCT or FDR

EH - East

Housing

RAWLES ST SIMONDS LOOP SHAFTER RD FHA687 10 159 18 2,862 R AC 7 0 100 $27,281 5,177 RECONSTRUCT or FDR

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 12 MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $519,561

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD KOBBE AVE IMMIGRANT

POINT

FHA012 20 1,290 30 38,700 C AC 63 46 100 $239,275 9,372 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Treatment Total $239,275

Year 2026 Area Total 245,772 Year 2026 Total $1,584,205

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2027

GRAHAM ST FRENCH COURT LINCOLN BLVD FHA445 20 381 38 14,478 C AC MP - Main Post 97 85 91 $11,525 20,477 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

MASON ST EAST BOUNDARY HALLECK ST FHA602 10 1,848 52 96,096 A AC/AC 94 81 88 $76,496 28,587 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $88,021

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD EAST COMPTON PARK BLVD. FHA012 51 930 30 27,900 C AC 68 49 100 $177,675 8,966 CIR w/ OVERLAY

MORAGA AVE FUNSTON AVE INFANTRY MP - Main Post

TERRACE

FHA449 10 1,267 28 35,476 C AC 68 49 100 $225,922 8,967 CIR w/ OVERLAY

KOBBE AVE LINCOLN BLVD PARK BLVD FHA623 10 3,379 28 97,712 C AC FC - Fort Scott 66 46 100 $622,258 9,096 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Treatment Total $1,025,855

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1040

PARKING

RTE 607 EDIE RD BLDG 1040 901jP P1 O AC $19,487 4,768 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

75 25 1,883 9 0 100

EH - East

Housing

VISTA COURT PARKING RTE 678 VISTA CT BLDG 787-789 902lP P1 O AC $65,475 4,768 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

158 40 6,327 39 23 100

Treatment Total $84,962

Year 2027 Area Total 279,872 Year 2027 Total $1,198,838

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2028

LO - Lobos

Creek

LINCOLN BLVD WEST ENTRANCE PERSHING DR

SOUTH

FHA010 10 2,165 42 90,930 A AC 59 80 87 $74,555 24,778 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD MERCHANT/STOR FC - Fort Scott

EY

GG BRIDGE

PLAZA

ENTRANCE

FHA010 35 1,145 38 43,510 A AC 22 80 87 $35,675 24,778 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD GG BRIDGE FC - Fort Scott

PLAZA ENTRANCE

LONG AVE FHA010 42 1,080 38 41,040 A AC 54 80 87 $33,650 24,778 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD LENDRUM CT 101 OVERPASS FHA010 46 710 32 22,720 A AC FC - Fort Scott 77 74 83 $18,629 28,316 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD 101 OVERPASS STOREY AVE FHA010 47 718 32 22,976 A AC FC - Fort Scott 84 83 90 $18,839 34,650 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD MONTGOMERY ST PRESIDIO BLVD FHA010 80 1,900 40 76,000 A AC MP - Main Post 94 80 87 $62,314 24,778 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 13 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2028

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG. 401 DEEMS FHA012 70 1,820 30 54,600 C AC 43 79 87 $44,768 17,322 MICROSURFACING

PF - Presidio

Forest

ARGUELLO BLVD SOUTH PARK

ENTRANCE

WASHINGTON

BLVD

FHA013 10 1,160 46 53,360 A AC/AC 89 89 94 $43,751 34,650 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

PRESIDIO BLVD LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR FHA015 15 660 33 21,780 A AC/AC 63 80 87 $17,858 24,778 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

WEDEMEYER STREET S. 14TH AVE

ENTRANCE

BATTERY

CAULFIELD RD

FHA426 10 1,795 20 35,900 C AC 84 82 89 $29,435 23,328 MICROSURFACING

SHERIDAN AVE RILEY AVE GRAHAM ST FHA437 20 963 31 29,853 C AC MP - Main Post 16 79 87 $24,477 17,322 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR LYON ST FHA438 20 578 32 18,496 A AC/AC 39 80 87 $15,166 24,778 MICROSURFACING

MONTGOMERY ST MORAGA AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA443 10 1,478 26 38,428 C AC/AC MP - Main Post 82 81 88 $31,508 22,881 MICROSURFACING

GRAHAM ST LINCOLN BLVD MORAGA AVE FHA445 10 1,637 32 52,384 C AC MP - Main Post 39 79 87 $42,951 17,322 MICROSURFACING

HALLECK ST LINCOLN BLVD FRENCH CT FHA452 10 415 38 15,770 C AC MP - Main Post 58 79 87 $12,931 17,322 MICROSURFACING

FRENCH CT GRAHAM ST HALLECK ST FHA453 10 305 24 7,320 C AC MP - Main Post 42 83 90 $6,002 16,008 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GORGAS TR GORGAS AVE LYON ST FHA455 30 130 12 1,560 O AC 94 86 92 $1,280 15,443 MICROSURFACING

RUCKMAN AVE RALSTON AVE UPTON FHA642 10 200 24 4,800 C AC FC - Fort Scott 41 79 87 $3,936 17,322 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

MCDOWELL AVE Lincoln Blvd Cowles St FHA657 10 748 32 23,936 C AC 27 79 87 $19,626 17,322 MICROSURFACING

BA - Baker

Beach

BATTERY CAULFIELD

CONNECTOR RD

PERSHING DR. BATTERY

CAULFIELD RD.

PT702 10 300 11 3,150 C AC 97 83 90 $2,583 20,332 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $539,934

PS - Presidio

Hill

ARGUELLO BLVD WASHINGTON

BLVD

MORAGA AVE FHA013 30 2,048 28 68,544 A AC 76 69 78 $121,768 9,634 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

PRESIDIO BLVD SOUTH

ENTRANCE

LOMBARD ST FHA015 10 2,733 32 157,120 A AC 68 61 72 $279,122 9,014 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

MACARTHUR AVE PRESIDIO BLVD EL POLIN LOOP FHA016 10 2,323 27 66,986 C AC 76 68 77 $100,692 7,557 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

LOMBARD ST PRESIDIO BLVD LETTERMAN FHA438 10 689 32 22,048 A AC/AC 67 65 75 $39,168 12,719 CAPE SEAL

CF - Crissy

Field

MASON ST MCDOWELL AVE END PARKING

LOT

FHA602 30 1,225 40 49,000 A AC 75 68 78 $87,048 9,584 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $627,798

BUILDING 135 PARKING RTE 441 FISHER MP - Main Post

LOOP

BLDG 135 900oP P1 385 24 9,240 O AC 63 49 100 $53,033 8,362 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

KEYES AVE CANBY ST LINCOLN BLVD FHA446 20 538 26 34,320 R AC/AC MP - Main Post 63 49 100 $196,977 8,313 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

BARNARD AVE PRESIDIO BLVD HICKS PARKING FHA450 10 1,426 20 28,520 R AC MP - Main Post 46 48 100 $163,689 8,400 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

BLISS RD INFANTRY MP - Main Post

TERRACE

MONTGOMERY

ST

FHA688 10 317 30 9,510 R AC 62 48 100 $54,582 8,463 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $468,281

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 14 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2028

KINZEY ST RALSTON AVE FC - Fort Scott

EAST

RALSTON AVE

WEST

FHA611 10 422 22 9,284 R AC 38 19 100 $93,883 4,880 RECONSTRUCT or FDR

PS - Presidio

Hill

STILLWELL RD LINCOLN BLVD PERSHING DR FHA625 10 950 32 30,400 R AC 37 17 100 $307,414 4,880 RECONSTRUCT or FDR

Treatment Total $401,297

BUILDING 1207/1208 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 627 RALSTON

AVE

BLDG 1207/1208 903haP P1 O AC $31,316 4,630 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

73 40 2,938 30 8 100

BUILDING 1205/1206 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 627 RALSTON

AVE

BLDG 1205/1206 903hcP P1 O AC $30,229 4,630 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

71 40 2,836 35 14 100

Treatment Total $61,545

Year 2028 Area Total 1,149,259 Year 2028 Total $2,098,855

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2029

BUILDING 222-229 MP - Main Post

PARKING

RTE 452 HALLECK

ST

BLDG 222-228 900eP P1 710 40 28,400 O AC/AC 96 81 88 $23,985 15,972 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 87 PARKING RTE 445 GRAHAM MP - Main Post

ST

BLDG 85-87 900jP P1 210 40 8,400 O AC 74 73 82 $7,094 17,755 MICROSURFACING

SAL ST GRAHAM ST KEYES AVE 900sP 10 124 29 3,596 R AC MP - Main Post 42 81 88 $3,037 13,182 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 36/37 MP - Main Post

PARKING

RTE 445 GRAHAM

ST

BLDG 36 900xP P1 430 40 17,213 O AC/AC 95 81 88 $14,537 15,802 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 951 PARKING RTE 652 FC - Fort Scott

HOFFMAN ST

BLDG 951 903aP P1 286 40 11,453 O AC 42 81 88 $9,673 13,182 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1575/1577

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1575-1577 906caP P1 331 15 4,969 O AC 79 76 84 $4,197 16,007 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1416

PARKING

RTE 012

WASHINGTON

BLVD

BLDG 1416 906fbP P1 86 40 3,431 O AC 49 81 88 $2,898 13,182 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1509

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1509 906xpP P1 140 16 2,249 O AC 88 88 93 $1,900 18,883 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 937 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 937 909dP P1 80 50 4,000 O AC 84 85 92 $3,379 21,538 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD KOBBE AVE MERCHANT/STO FC - Fort Scott

REY

FHA010 30 2,335 32 74,720 A AC/AC 88 80 88 $63,103 27,372 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD LONG AVE LENDRUM CT FHA010 43 470 38 17,860 A AC FC - Fort Scott 54 80 87 $15,084 24,056 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

LINCOLN BLVD STOREY PATTEN FHA010 50 1,760 28 49,280 A AC 55 80 87 $41,618 24,056 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

LINCOLN BLVD PATTEN SHERIDAN AV FHA010 60 1,060 26 27,560 A AC 88 77 85 $23,275 23,996 MICROSURFACING

TAYLOR RD LINCOLN BLVD BLISS RD FHA442 10 1,162 18 20,916 R AC MP - Main Post 80 79 87 $17,664 18,601 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 15 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2029

LC - Letterman

Complex

GORGAS AVE EAST ENTRANCE KENDALL DR FHA455 10 1,262 50 63,100 C AC 33 78 86 $53,289 17,517 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GORGAS AVE KENDALL DR GIRARD RD FHA455 20 302 50 15,100 C AC 85 75 84 $12,753 15,148 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GIRARD RD EDIE RD GORGAS AVE FHA456 20 454 28 12,712 A AC 85 80 88 $10,736 28,632 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GEN KENNEDY AVE EDIE ROAD BIRMINGHAM

PARKING

FHA458 30 200 34 6,800 R AC/AC 79 80 87 $5,743 19,916 MICROSURFACING

OWEN ST GRAHAM ST ANZA ST FHA6145 10 142 26 3,692 R AC MP - Main Post 74 70 79 $3,118 13,965 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

PIPER LOOP DEEMS RD DUDLEY RD FHA615 20 550 16 17,744 R AC/AC 86 83 90 $14,986 15,910 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

PIPER LOOP DUDLEY RD END FHA615 30 559 20 11,180 R AC/AC 84 86 92 $9,442 21,499 MICROSURFACING

ROD RD STOREY AVE FC - Fort Scott

NORTH

STOREY AVE

SOUTH

FHA617 10 422 16 9,268 R AC 84 82 90 $7,827 17,986 MICROSURFACING

UPTON AVE RALSTON AVE STOREY AVE FHA620 20 1,478 45 66,510 C AC FC - Fort Scott 45 79 87 $56,169 16,818 MICROSURFACING

RALSTON AVE STOREY AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA627 10 3,168 25 81,626 C AC FC - Fort Scott 46 79 87 $68,935 16,818 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

AMATURY LOOP PARK BLVD

SOUTH

PARK BLVD

NORTH

FHA640 10 1,267 22 45,696 R AC/AC 96 81 88 $38,591 16,000 MICROSURFACING

HOFFMAN ST ARMISTEAD RD LINCOLN BLVD FHA652 10 1,109 24 26,616 R AC/AC FC - Fort Scott 95 81 88 $22,478 15,876 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

CRISSY FIELD AVE MCDOWELL AVE LINCOLN BLVD

WEST

FHA654 40 986 20 19,720 O AC/PCC 39 81 88 $16,654 13,182 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

COWLES ST LINCOLN BLVD MCDOWELL AVE FHA655 10 640 20 12,800 R AC 42 81 88 $10,810 13,182 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

MCRAE ST PORTOLA ST

SOUTH

PORTOLA ST

NORTH

FHA672 10 686 12 14,049 R AC 43 81 88 $11,865 13,182 MICROSURFACING

PF - Presidio

Forest

ROB HILL

CAMPGROUND PATH

CENTRAL

MAGAZINE

END FHA705 10 1,055 12 12,660 O AC 92 78 86 $10,692 13,476 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

ANZA TRAIL SPUR WEDEMEYER AVE WEDEMEYER

PARKING

FHA708 10 80 6 480 O AC 84 77 85 $406 13,577 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $585,938

BUILDING 63 PARKING RTE 448 FUNSTON MP - Main Post

AVE

BLDG 63 900lP P1 1,630 40 65,225 O AC 65 61 72 $96,396 7,522 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 558 PARKING RTE 015 PRESIDIO

BLVD

BLDG 558 901dP P1 250 40 10,000 O AC 69 66 75 $14,779 8,548 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

BUILDING 777 PARKING RTE 674 MORTON

ST

BLDG 777 902iaP P1 132 40 5,291 O AC 68 64 74 $7,820 7,707 CAPE SEAL

PF - Presidio

Forest

INSPIRATION POINT RTE 013

ARGUELLO BLVD

INSPIRATION

POINT

910bP P1 532 40 21,290 O AC 73 69 78 $31,465 7,951 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

PRESIDIO

PROMENADE

LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR FHA700 10 1,300 9 11,700 O AC 62 60 70 $17,292 7,871 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $167,752

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 16 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2029

CS - Cavalry

Stables

BUILDING 667/668

PARKING

RTE 657

MCDOWELL AVE

BLDG 667 905bP P1 1,261 40 50,456 O AC 64 48 100 $298,276 8,201 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

PS - Presidio

Hill

WEST PACIFIC AVE PARK BLVD GATE FHA014 010 3,260 24 78,240 O AC 64 48 100 $462,524 8,203 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

PENA ST MESA ST KEYES AVE FHA689 10 211 18 3,798 R AC MP - Main Post 64 48 100 $22,453 8,203 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $783,253

PS - Presidio

Hill

LINCOLN BLVD PERSHING DR

SOUTH

KOBBE AV FHA010 20 2,640 37 97,680 A AC 57 47 100 $673,686 11,437 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Treatment Total $673,686

BUILDING 1204/1205 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 627 RALSTON

AVE

BLDG 1204/1205 903hdP P1 O AC $37,613 4,495 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

86 40 3,426 32 6 100

Treatment Total $37,613

Year 2029 Area Total 1,040,906 Year 2029 Total $2,248,242

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2030

LC - Letterman

Complex

GIRARD RD LINCOLN BLVD EDIE RD 45 10 581 45 26,145 A AC 94 78 86 $22,743 23,540 MICROSURFACING

TAYLOR ROAD MP - Main Post

PARKING

RTE 442, TAYLOR

RD

BLDG 116 900hP P1 992 40 39,685 O AC 78 72 81 $34,520 13,615 MICROSURFACING

FITNESS PARKING RTE 015 PRESIDIO MP - Main Post

BLVD

END 900mP P1 315 60 18,900 O AC 86 83 90 $16,441 17,011 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 50 PARKING RTE 013 MP - Main Post

ARGUELLO BLVD

BLDG 50 900tP P1 52 50 2,600 O AC 84 80 88 $2,262 16,438 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 67 PARKING RTE 454 MP - Main Post

MARTINEZ AVE

BLDG 67 900wP P1 215 40 8,600 O AC 81 75 83 $7,481 13,573 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1028

SERVICE

RTE 458 GIRARD

RD

BLDG 1028 901hP P1 516 16 8,255 O AC 77 71 80 $7,181 13,631 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 300 PARKING ARGUELLO END 906kP P1 1,916 24 45,984 O AC 77 71 80 $40,000 13,627 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 1183-85

PARKING

EAST OF

MARSHALL

BLDG 1184 AND

1185

909mP P1 2,014 40 80,550 O AC 77 71 80 $70,067 13,631 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD IMMIGRANT POINT

OVERLOOK

WEST

COMPTON

FHA012 31 890 30 26,700 C AC 72 79 87 $23,225 16,328 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD WEST COMPTON EAST COMPTON FHA012 40 1,300 30 39,000 C AC/AC 88 84 91 $33,925 22,744 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD DEEMS ARGUELLO FHA012 80 970 32 31,040 C AC 56 79 87 $27,001 16,328 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 17 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2030

PS - Presidio

Hill

WEST PACIFIC AVE GATE ARGEULLO

BLVD

FHA014 020 1,305 24 31,320 C AC 51 79 87 $27,244 16,328 MICROSURFACING

FUNSTON AVE MORAGA AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA448 10 1,637 32 52,384 C AC MP - Main Post 73 79 87 $45,567 16,328 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BATTERY CAULFIELD

RD

WASHINGTON

BLVD

BLDG 1450 FHA603 10 412 24 9,888 C AC/AC 86 82 89 $8,602 21,889 MICROSURFACING

STOREY AVE LINCOLN BLVD FC - Fort Scott

WEST

RALSTON EAST FHA628 10 845 23 19,435 C AC/AC 93 80 88 $16,906 18,890 MICROSURFACING

STOREY AVE RALSTON EAST RUCKMAN FHA628 20 845 23 19,435 C AC FC - Fort Scott 52 79 87 $16,906 16,328 MICROSURFACING

STOREY AVE RUCKMAN LINCOLN BLVD FC - Fort Scott

EAST

FHA628 30 844 23 19,412 C AC/AC 93 80 88 $16,886 18,890 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

N 15TH AVE SOUTH

BOUNDARY

WEDEMEYER ST FHA630 10 317 22 6,974 C AC/AC 93 80 87 $6,067 17,699 MICROSURFACING

HARRISON BLVD WASHINGTON FC - Fort Scott

BLVD

KOBBE AVE FHA636 10 581 24 13,944 R AC/AC 84 80 87 $12,130 15,112 MICROSURFACING

RUCKMAN AVE UPTON STOREY FHA642 20 645 24 15,480 C AC/AC FC - Fort Scott 93 80 88 $13,466 18,858 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

MCDOWELL AVE Cowles St Mason St FHA657 20 807 32 25,824 C AC 89 81 88 $22,463 20,336 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

ANZA TRAIL 14TH AVE WEDEMEYER ST FHA703 10 1,200 8 9,600 O AC 78 72 81 $8,351 13,614 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $479,434

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1016

PARKING

LINCOLN BLVD

NORTH

TORNEY AVE 901kP P1 260 16 4,160 O AC 69 64 74 $6,333 7,448 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

BUILDING 808/809

PARKING

RTE 451

FERNANDEZ ST

BLDG 808 902jP P1 93 40 3,708 O AC 75 69 79 $5,645 7,739 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

SIBLEY ROAD PARKING RTE 676 SIBLEY

RD

BLDG 790-791 902mP P1 117 40 4,673 O AC 68 63 73 $7,114 7,383 CAPE SEAL

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1515

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1515 906xjP P1 106 16 1,702 O AC 75 68 78 $3,208 6,392 CAPE SEAL

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1511

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1511 906xmP P1 273 16 4,370 O AC 74 69 78 $6,653 7,688 CAPE SEAL

MARTINEZ ST FUNSTON AVE PRESIDIO BLVD FHA454 10 686 12 8,232 R AC MP - Main Post 75 69 79 $12,532 7,739 CAPE SEAL

THOMAS AVE INFANTRY MP - Main Post

TERRACE

ARGUELLO

BLVD

FHA669 10 1,373 14 19,222 R AC 74 69 78 $29,261 7,686 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $70,746

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1013

PARKING

RTE 457 TORNEY

AVE

BLDG 1013 901fcP P1 34 40 1,372 O AC 66 49 100 $8,355 7,946 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

BUILDING 569/572

PARKING

RTE 685 RUGER

ST

BLDG 569/572 902pbP P1 310 40 12,422 O AC 55 49 100 $75,637 7,887 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

RAMSEL CT ARMISTEAD RD END 903bP 10 392 22 19,271 R AC FC - Fort Scott 54 49 100 $117,340 7,945 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

BUILDING 1340 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 623 KOBBE

AVE

BLDG 1340 903vP P1 135 12 1,629 O AC 65 47 100 $9,919 8,020 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

CS - Cavalry

Stables

BUILDING 662 PARKING RTE 657

MCDOWELL AVE

BLDG 661 905aP P1 2,176 20 43,524 O AC 66 49 100 $265,016 7,944 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 18 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2030

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1432

PARKING

RTE 603 BATTERY

CAULFIELD

BLDG 1432 906edP P1 224 40 8,973 O AC 66 49 100 $54,637 7,945 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

PF - Presidio

Forest

QUARRY RD FERNANDEZ ST END OF

PAVEMENT

FHA434 10 1,109 25 45,840 R AC 65 47 100 $279,118 8,023 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

MESA ST CANBY ST MORAGA AVE FHA447 30 1,046 37 70,901 R AC/AC MP - Main Post 66 48 100 $431,713 7,953 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

FERNANDEZ ST BARNARD AVE MACARTHUR

AVE

FHA451 10 370 19 7,030 R AC 66 49 100 $42,806 7,947 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

PH - Public

Health Hospital

PARK TRAIL SPUR 14TH AVE PARK TRAIL FHA707 10 250 10 2,500 O AC 66 49 100 $15,223 7,945 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $1,299,764

Year 2030 Area Total 810,684 Year 2030 Total $1,849,944

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2031

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 610 WEST

PARKING

RTE 602 MASON

ST

BLDG 610 900aP P1 1,074 41 44,034 O AC 80 73 81 $39,453 13,234 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

LOMBARD ST PULLOUT PARKINGRTE 438

LOMBARD ST

EAST

ENTRANCE

901bP P1 69 40 2,756 O AC 84 75 83 $2,470 13,139 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1567-73 ODD

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1567-1573 906ccP P1 416 15 6,243 O AC 95 80 88 $5,594 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1552-58

EVEN PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1552-1558 906cdP P1 333 15 5,003 O AC 95 80 88 $4,483 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING

1582/84/61/63/65 PARK

STILLWELL RD PERSHING DR 906ceP P1 865 15 12,978 O AC 95 80 88 $11,628 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1546-50

EVEN PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1548 906cfP P1 309 15 4,640 O AC 95 80 88 $4,158 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1555-59 ODD

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1555 906cgP P1 299 15 4,990 O AC 95 80 88 $4,471 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1530-44

EVEN PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG

1534/1542/1544

906chP P1 913 15 13,703 O AC 95 80 88 $12,278 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1549

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1551 906ciP P1 245 15 3,678 O AC 95 80 88 $3,296 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING

1528/1545/1547PARKIN

G

PERSHING DR BLDG 1547 906cjP P1 487 15 7,317 O AC 95 80 88 $6,556 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1449/1450

PARKING

RTE 603 BATTERY

CAULFIELD

BLDG 1449 906ecP P1 44 30 1,330 O AC 84 75 83 $1,192 13,138 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1535-43 ODD

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1535-1543 906xaP P1 896 16 14,342 O AC 95 80 88 $12,850 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1533

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1533 906xbP P1 151 16 2,431 O AC 95 80 88 $2,179 13,875 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 19 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2031

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1524/1526

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1524-1526 906xcP P1 226 16 3,620 O AC 94 80 88 $3,244 13,909 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1520

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1520 906xeP P1 274 16 4,398 O AC 95 80 88 $3,941 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1525

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1525 906xfP P1 107 16 1,726 O AC 95 80 88 $1,547 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1518/1580

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1518/1580 906xgP P1 190 16 3,050 O AC 95 80 88 $2,733 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1517/1519

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1517-1519 906xiP P1 279 16 4,472 O AC 95 80 88 $4,007 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1510-14

EVEN PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1510-1514 906xkP P1 392 16 6,272 O AC 95 80 88 $5,620 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1506/1508

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1506-1508 906xnP P1 244 16 3,910 O AC 95 80 88 $3,504 13,876 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1504

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1504 906xqP P1 156 16 2,501 O AC 95 80 88 $2,241 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1503-7 ODD

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1503-1507 906xrP P1 627 16 10,035 O AC 95 80 88 $8,991 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1502

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1502 906xsP P1 117 16 1,887 O AC 95 80 88 $1,691 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1501

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1501 906xtP P1 127 16 2,045 O AC 95 80 88 $1,833 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1591

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1591 906yaP P1 311 15 4,672 O AC 94 80 88 $4,186 13,909 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1592/1594

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1592/1594 906ybP P1 183 15 2,748 O AC 95 80 88 $2,463 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1587/1589

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1587/1589 906ycP P1 314 15 4,717 O AC 95 80 88 $4,227 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1588/1590

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1588/1590 906ydP P1 408 15 6,120 O AC 95 80 88 $5,484 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1583/1585

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1583/1585 906yeP P1 257 15 3,861 O AC 95 80 88 $3,460 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1586

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1586 906yfP P1 106 15 1,594 O AC 95 80 88 $1,429 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING

1516/1578/1580PARKIN

G

STILLWELL RD BLDG

1516/1578/1580

906ygP P1 467 15 7,007 O AC 95 80 88 $6,278 13,875 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

BUILDING 1801

PARKING

WEDEMEYER ST BLDG 1801 907aaP P1 1,611 24 38,664 O AC 94 80 87 $34,641 13,349 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

BUILDING 1808 NORTH

PARKING

RTE 428

WEDEMEYER ST

END (N/O BLDG

1808)

907dP P1 186 60 11,160 O AC 94 80 87 $9,999 13,349 MICROSURFACING

PF - Presidio

Forest

WASHINGTON BLVD LINCOLN BLVD KOBBE AVE FHA012 10 480 32 15,360 C AC 94 80 88 $13,762 14,848 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD PARK BLVD. BLDG. 401 FHA012 60 400 30 12,000 C AC 57 79 87 $10,752 15,852 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

LETTERMAN DR PRESIDIO BLVD LOMBARD ST FHA436 10 1,320 28 37,719 C AC/AC 52 79 87 $33,795 15,852 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 20 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2031

SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD RILEY AVE FHA437 10 315 31 9,765 C AC MP - Main Post 57 79 87 $8,749 15,852 MICROSURFACING

HALLECK ST FRENCH CT MASON ST FHA452 20 730 38 27,740 C AC MP - Main Post 58 79 87 $24,854 15,852 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

MASON ST HALLECK ST MCDOWELL AVE FHA602 20 3,850 38 146,300 A AC 65 80 87 $131,077 22,675 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

OREILLY AVE EDIE ROAD GORGAS AVE FHA614 20 155 21 3,255 C AC 94 81 88 $2,917 16,712 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

HAYS ST WEDEMEYER ST BROWN ST FHA631 10 572 17 9,724 R AC 94 80 87 $8,713 13,349 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

BROWN ST WYMAN AVE HAYS ST FHA634 10 219 18 3,942 R AC 92 79 87 $3,532 13,425 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

NAUMAN RD WASHINGTON

BLVD

END FHA665 10 1,214 12 14,568 R AC/AC 92 81 88 $13,053 13,760 MICROSURFACING

INFANTRY TERRACE SHERIDAN AVE MORAGA FHA668 10 600 23 13,800 C AC MP - Main Post 58 79 87 $12,365 15,852 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

CLARK ST LIGGETT AVE

LOOP

LIGGETT AVE FHA677 10 845 15 12,675 R AC 80 72 81 $11,357 13,220 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

BROADWAY GATE

CONNECTION

BROADWAY AND

LYON ST

PRESIDIO BLVD FHA706 10 475 12 5,700 O AC 41 78 86 $5,107 13,368 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

ANZA TRAIL SPUR WEDEMEYER AVE WEDEMEYER

PARKING

FHA708 20 200 6 1,200 O AC 84 75 83 $1,076 13,138 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $503,236

EH - East

Housing

BUILDING 779 PARKING RTE 674 MORTON

ST

BLDG 779 902ibP P1 63 40 2,508 O AC 72 65 75 $3,933 7,289 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

PORTOLA ST MACARTHUR AVE END FHA017 10 1,795 26 48,465 R AC 73 66 75 $94,081 5,933 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

GEN KENNEDY AVE TORNEY AVE EDIE ROAD FHA458 20 592 34 20,128 R AC 76 69 78 $31,559 7,473 CAPE SEAL

HITCHCOCK ST PARK BLVD HARRISON BLVD FHA638 10 2,640 18 49,028 R AC FC - Fort Scott 76 69 78 $76,872 7,473 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

RUGER ST SIMONDS LOOP LOMBARD ST FHA685 10 1,395 29 41,884 R AC 73 66 75 $65,671 7,346 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $272,116

BUILDING 93 PARKING RTE 443 MP - Main Post

MONTGOMERY

BLDG 93 900rP P1 537 40 21,494 O AC 56 48 100 $134,802 7,725 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

PF - Presidio

Forest

CENTRAL MAGAZINE

RD

WASHINGTON

BLVD

END FHA425 10 634 24 15,216 R AC 57 49 100 $95,429 7,675 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $230,231

GREENOUGH AVE RALSTON AVE KOBBE. AVE FHA637 10 787 20 17,229 R AC FC - Fort Scott 29 0 100 $190,381 4,466 RECONSTRUCT or FDR

APPLETON ST RUCKMAN AVE STOREY AVE FHA643 10 1,003 16 16,048 R AC FC - Fort Scott 37 6 100 $177,331 4,466 RECONSTRUCT or FDR

Treatment Total $367,712

PRESIDIO BLVD LETTERMAN DR MESA ST FHA015 25 1,436 33 47,388 A AC MP - Main Post 63 48 100 $346,733 10,759 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 21 MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $346,733

BUILDING 39 PARKING RTE 447 MESA ST BLDG 39 900kaP P1 O AC MP - Main Post $114,447 4,237 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

245 40 9,826 24 0 100

BUILDING 1203/1204 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 627 RALSTON

AVE

BLDG 1203/1204 903heP P1 O AC $30,004 4,237 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

64 40 2,576 28 0 100

BUILDING 1202/1203 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 627 RALSTON

AVE

BLDG 1202/1203 903hfP P1 O AC $35,234 4,237 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

76 40 3,025 28 0 100

Treatment Total $179,685

Year 2031 Area Total 856,467 Year 2031 Total $1,899,713

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2032

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 610 EAST

PARKING

RTE 602 MASON

ST

BLDG 610 900bP P1 500 210 105,000 O AC 81 72 81 $96,897 12,839 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 38 PARKING MESA ST BUILDING 38 900kbP P1 205 25 5,125 O AC MP - Main Post 84 74 82 $4,730 12,830 MICROSURFACING

ANZA PARKING ANZA AVE MIDDLE ANZA AVE MP - Main Post

NORTH

900zP P1 342 108 36,936 O AC 96 80 87 $34,086 13,604 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1027

PARKING

RTE 607 EDIE RD BLDG 1027 901iP P1 91 40 3,633 O AC 90 77 85 $3,353 12,540 MICROSURFACING

LO - Lobos

Creek

BUILDING 1752

PARKING

RTE 010 LINCOLN

W. ENTRANCE

BLDG 1752 908bN P1 615 40 24,625 O AC 43 78 86 $22,725 12,979 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

PALACE OF FINE ART

PARKING

PALACE DRIVE PALACE DRIVE 909aP P1 2,033 40 81,350 O AC 81 72 81 $75,072 12,839 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

PARK TR 14TH AVE ENT W. PACIFIC AVE FHA011 10 1,320 22 30,360 O AC 42 78 86 $28,017 12,979 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WEST PACIFIC AVE ARGUELLO BLVD PRESIDIO BLVD FHA014 030 3,512 24 84,290 C AC 62 79 87 $77,786 15,391 MICROSURFACING

RILEY AVE SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA616 10 422 18 7,596 R AC MP - Main Post 83 73 81 $7,010 12,857 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BROOKS ST LINCOLN BLVD END PARKING FHA626 10 724 40 37,031 R AC/AC 94 79 87 $34,174 12,943 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BAKER CT BROOK ST END PARKING FHA626 20 241 40 16,243 R AC/AC 94 79 87 $14,990 12,943 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

PATH O'REILLY AVE GENERAL

KENNEDY

PARKING

FHA702 10 300 10 3,000 O AC 94 78 85 $2,769 12,420 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $401,609

EH - East

Housing

GIBBON CT SIMONDS LOOP END 902aP 10 314 17 5,202 R AC 72 63 73 $8,401 6,988 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

LIGGETT AVE PRESIDIO BLVD END OF LOOP FHA675 10 1,637 20 32,740 R AC 78 69 78 $52,874 7,262 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $61,275

EH - East

Housing

SHERMAN RD PRESIDIO BLVD RUGER ST FHA686 10 1,003 16 20,745 R AC 24 0 100 $236,109 4,336 RECONSTRUCT or FDR

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 22 MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $236,109

PS - Presidio

Hill

PARK BLVD WASHINGTON

BLVD

LINCOLN BLVD FHA011 30 2,695 39 105,105 C AC 72 49 100 $775,947 7,705 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Treatment Total $775,947

BUILDING 1347 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 623 KOBBE

AVE

BLDG 1347 903uP P1 O AC $124,238 4,113 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

259 40 10,356 35 0 100

Treatment Total $124,238

Year 2032 Area Total 609,337 Year 2032 Total $1,599,178

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2033

BUILDING 130 PARKING RTE 441 FISHER MP - Main Post

LOOP

BLDG 130 900pP P1 586 40 23,442 O AC 86 74 82 $22,282 12,450 MICROSURFACING

MAINTENANCE AREA FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 627 RALSTON

AVE

BLDG 1355 903jP P1 2,530 40 101,203 O AC 45 78 86 $96,195 12,601 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 1228/1230 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 627 RALSTON

AVE

RTE 620 UPTON

AVE FROM

STOREY

903kP P1 1,841 40 73,673 O AC 47 78 86 $70,027 12,601 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

BUILDING 682 PARKING PARK BLVD BLDG 682 905cP P1 415 40 16,600 O AC 46 78 86 $15,779 12,601 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1440-1443

PARKING

RTE 603 BATTERY

CAULFIELD

BLDG 1440-1443 906ebP P1 195 40 7,825 O AC 46 78 86 $7,438 12,601 MICROSURFACING

BA - Baker

Beach

BUILDING 1770-1781

PARKING

RTE 684 GIBSON

RD

BLDG 1781 908cP P1 862 29 25,019 O AC 84 72 81 $23,781 12,467 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 1188

PARKING

RTE 464 LUNDEEN

ST

EAST

BOUNDARY

909bP P1 302 40 12,081 O AC 84 72 81 $11,484 12,466 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 924/926

PARKING

MASON ST BLDG 924/926 909kP P1 183 60 11,005 O AC 84 72 81 $10,461 12,466 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD KOBBE AVE IMMIGRANT

POINT

FHA012 20 1,290 30 38,700 C AC 63 79 87 $36,785 14,942 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

EDIE RD GIRARD RD OREILLY AVE FHA607 10 810 24 19,440 R AC 47 78 86 $18,478 12,601 MICROSURFACING

BATTERY WAGNER RD STOREY AVENUE STOREY FC - Fort Scott

AVENUE

FHA646 10 739 30 27,416 R AC 46 78 86 $26,060 12,601 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

MORTON ST RODRIQUEZ ST LIGGETT AVE FHA674 10 739 18 13,302 R AC 48 78 86 $12,644 12,601 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

SUMNER AVE PRESIDIO BLVD MACARTHUR

AVE

FHA680 10 1,584 16 25,344 R AC 47 78 86 $24,090 12,601 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $375,504

BUILDING 218 PARKING GRAHAM ST BLDG 218 900yP P1 96 65 6,240 O AC MP - Main Post 71 61 71 $10,380 6,651 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1028

PARKING

RTE 607 EDIE RD BLDG 1028 901gP P1 1,696 40 67,835 O AC 72 61 72 $112,836 6,694 CAPE SEAL

FISHER LOOP SHERIDAN AVE END OF LOOP FHA441 10 1,923 20 38,478 R AC MP - Main Post 71 60 71 $79,243 5,365 CAPE SEAL

KEYES AVE PENA ST CANBY ST FHA446 30 782 26 34,320 R AC MP - Main Post 80 69 78 $57,088 7,052 CAPE SEAL

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 23 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2033

EH - East

Housing

WALLEN ST MACARTHUR AVE END FHA671 10 264 20 10,769 R AC 72 61 72 $17,914 6,694 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

RODRIGUEZ ST PORTOLA ST

SOUTH

PORTOLA ST

NORTH

FHA673 10 1,267 18 23,885 R AC 71 60 71 $49,190 5,363 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $326,651

PS - Presidio

Hill

DUDLEY RD PIPER LOOP END 906jP 10 377 13 7,166 R AC/AC 61 49 100 $47,680 7,212 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $47,680

INFANTRY TERRACE MORAGA ARGUELLO FHA668 20 2,146 23 49,358 C AC MP - Main Post 73 47 100 $375,322 7,582 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Treatment Total $375,322

BUILDING 1299 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 628 STOREY

AVE

LOG CABIN -

BLDG 1299

903fP P1 O AC $273,613 3,993 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

553 40 22,143 27 0 100

Treatment Total $273,613

Year 2033 Area Total 655,244 Year 2033 Total $1,398,770

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2034

BUILDING 220 PARKING RTE 452 HALLECK MP - Main Post

ST

BLDG 220 900fP P2 760 40 30,400 O AC 53 78 86 $29,763 12,234 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

TORNEY PARKING RTE 457 TORNEY

AVE

RTE 010

LINCOLN BLVD

901faP P1 252 40 10,069 O AC 52 78 86 $9,858 12,234 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD EAST COMPTON PARK BLVD. FHA012 51 930 30 27,900 C AC 68 79 87 $27,315 14,507 MICROSURFACING

GRAHAM ST FRENCH COURT LINCOLN BLVD FHA445 20 381 38 14,478 C AC MP - Main Post 97 79 87 $14,175 17,013 MICROSURFACING

MORAGA AVE FUNSTON AVE INFANTRY MP - Main Post

TERRACE

FHA449 10 1,267 28 35,476 C AC 68 79 87 $34,732 14,507 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

MASON ST EAST BOUNDARY HALLECK ST FHA602 10 1,848 52 96,096 A AC/AC 94 78 86 $94,081 25,227 MICROSURFACING

KOBBE AVE LINCOLN BLVD PARK BLVD FHA623 10 3,379 28 97,712 C AC FC - Fort Scott 66 79 87 $95,663 14,507 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $305,587

LOT D PARKING LINCOLN RALSTON AND FC - Fort Scott

BLDG 1369

903wP P1 400 135 54,000 O AC 61 49 100 $370,071 7,049 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $370,071

PS - Presidio

Hill

BATTERY CAULFIELD

RD

BLDG 1450 WEDEMEYER ST FHA603 20 697 24 16,728 C AC 25 0 100 $272,952 3,594 RECONSTRUCT or FDR

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 24 MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $272,952

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 651 PARKING MCDOWELL AVE BLDG 651 909cbP P1 O PCC $51,107 3,217 RECONSTRUCT

SURFACE (AC)

166 20 3,332 28 3 100

Treatment Total $51,107

Year 2034 Area Total 386,191 Year 2034 Total $999,717

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2035

LO - Lobos

Creek

LINCOLN BLVD WEST ENTRANCE PERSHING DR

SOUTH

FHA010 10 2,165 42 90,930 A AC 59 76 84 $91,694 21,692 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD MERCHANT/STOR FC - Fort Scott

EY

GG BRIDGE

PLAZA

ENTRANCE

FHA010 35 1,145 38 43,510 A AC 22 76 84 $43,876 21,692 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD GG BRIDGE FC - Fort Scott

PLAZA ENTRANCE

LONG AVE FHA010 42 1,080 38 41,040 A AC 54 76 84 $41,385 21,692 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD LENDRUM CT 101 OVERPASS FHA010 46 710 32 22,720 A AC FC - Fort Scott 77 71 80 $22,911 22,413 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD 101 OVERPASS STOREY AVE FHA010 47 718 32 22,976 A AC FC - Fort Scott 84 83 90 $23,169 28,461 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD MONTGOMERY ST PRESIDIO BLVD FHA010 80 1,900 40 76,000 A AC MP - Main Post 94 76 84 $76,638 21,692 MICROSURFACING

PF - Presidio

Forest

ARGUELLO BLVD SOUTH PARK

ENTRANCE

WASHINGTON

BLVD

FHA013 10 1,160 46 53,360 A AC/AC 89 88 94 $53,808 29,147 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

PRESIDIO BLVD LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR FHA015 15 660 33 21,780 A AC/AC 63 76 84 $21,963 21,692 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

LOMBARD ST LETTERMAN DR LYON ST FHA438 20 578 32 18,496 A AC/AC 39 76 84 $18,652 21,692 MICROSURFACING

MONTGOMERY ST MORAGA AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA443 10 1,478 26 38,428 C AC/AC MP - Main Post 82 79 87 $38,751 19,066 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $432,847

PS - Presidio

Hill

ARGUELLO BLVD WASHINGTON

BLVD

MORAGA AVE FHA013 30 2,048 28 68,544 A AC 76 62 73 $149,759 7,391 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

LOMBARD ST PRESIDIO BLVD LETTERMAN FHA438 10 689 32 22,048 A AC/AC 67 63 73 $48,172 10,077 CAPE SEAL

CF - Crissy

Field

MASON ST MCDOWELL AVE END PARKING

LOT

FHA602 30 1,225 40 49,000 A AC 75 61 72 $107,058 7,327 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $304,989

UPTON AVE HITCHCOCK ST RALSTON AVE FHA620 10 581 20 11,620 C AC FC - Fort Scott 38 0 100 $195,293 3,489 RECONSTRUCT or FDR

Treatment Total $195,293

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 643/644

PARKING

MASON ST BLDG 643/644 909hP P1 O PCC $97,917 3,123 RECONSTRUCT

SURFACE (AC)

103 60 6,198 23 0 100

Treatment Total $97,917

BUILDING 1241-45 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 643

APPLETON ST

BLDG 1241 903mP P1 O AC $567,769 3,764 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

1,082 40 43,311 19 0 100

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 25 MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $567,769

Year 2035 Area Total 629,961 Year 2035 Total $1,598,815

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2036

PS - Presidio

Hill

LINCOLN BLVD PERSHING DR

SOUTH

KOBBE AV FHA010 20 2,640 37 97,680 A AC 57 80 87 $101,455 19,560 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD KOBBE AVE MERCHANT/STO FC - Fort Scott

REY

FHA010 30 2,335 32 74,720 A AC/AC 88 77 85 $77,608 23,704 MICROSURFACING

LINCOLN BLVD LONG AVE LENDRUM CT FHA010 43 470 38 17,860 A AC FC - Fort Scott 54 76 84 $18,551 21,060 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

LINCOLN BLVD STOREY PATTEN FHA010 50 1,760 28 49,280 A AC 55 76 84 $51,185 21,060 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

LINCOLN BLVD PATTEN SHERIDAN AV FHA010 60 1,060 26 27,560 A AC 88 72 81 $28,626 19,677 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GORGAS TR GORGAS AVE LYON ST FHA455 30 130 12 1,560 O AC 94 84 91 $1,621 13,709 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GIRARD RD EDIE RD GORGAS AVE FHA456 20 454 28 12,712 A AC 85 77 85 $13,204 23,657 MICROSURFACING

RUCKMAN AVE RALSTON AVE UPTON FHA642 10 200 24 4,800 C AC FC - Fort Scott 41 74 82 $4,986 14,825 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

VISTA CT LIGGETT AVE END FHA678 10 264 22 5,808 R AC 51 75 84 $6,033 11,968 MICROSURFACING

BA - Baker

Beach

BATTERY CAULFIELD

CONNECTOR RD

PERSHING DR. BATTERY

CAULFIELD RD.

PT702 10 300 11 3,150 C AC 97 75 83 $3,272 15,426 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $306,541

LC - Letterman

Complex

GORGAS AVE KENDALL DR GIRARD RD FHA455 20 302 50 15,100 C AC 85 67 76 $28,754 5,841 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $28,754

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1521

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1521 906xhP P1 64 16 1,037 O AC 65 49 100 $7,540 6,643 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

BATTERY SAFFOLD RD KOBBE AVE. BLDG 1351 PT701 10 265 14 3,710 R AC FC - Fort Scott 69 49 100 $26,974 6,685 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $34,514

FUNSTON AVE MORAGA AVE HARDIE AVE FHA448 20 R PCC MP - Main Post $65,870 3,033 RECONSTRUCT

SURFACE (AC)

176 23 4,048 44 21 100

Treatment Total $65,870

BUILDING 1249 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 643

APPLETON ST

BLDG 1249 903nP P1 O AC $562,510 3,655 RECONSTRUCT

STRUCTURE (AC)

1,104 32 41,660 28 0 100

Treatment Total $562,510

Year 2036 Area Total 360,685 Year 2036 Total $998,189

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 26 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2037

LC - Letterman

Complex

GIRARD RD LINCOLN BLVD EDIE RD 45 10 581 45 26,145 A AC 94 73 81 $27,971 19,483 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1575/1577

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1575-1577 906caP P1 331 15 4,969 O AC 79 73 81 $5,316 12,711 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1509

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1509 906xpP P1 140 16 2,249 O AC 88 87 93 $2,406 15,354 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 937 PARKING MASON ST BLDG 937 909dP P1 80 50 4,000 O AC 84 85 92 $4,280 16,749 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD IMMIGRANT POINT

OVERLOOK

WEST

COMPTON

FHA012 31 890 30 26,700 C AC 72 75 84 $28,564 14,287 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD WEST COMPTON EAST COMPTON FHA012 40 1,300 30 39,000 C AC/AC 88 84 90 $41,723 19,210 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD BLDG. 401 DEEMS FHA012 70 1,820 30 54,600 C AC 43 72 81 $58,412 14,374 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD DEEMS ARGUELLO FHA012 80 970 32 31,040 C AC 56 75 84 $33,207 14,287 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

WEDEMEYER STREET S. 14TH AVE

ENTRANCE

BATTERY

CAULFIELD RD

FHA426 10 1,795 20 35,900 C AC 84 76 84 $38,406 16,213 MICROSURFACING

SHERIDAN AVE RILEY AVE GRAHAM ST FHA437 20 963 31 29,853 C AC MP - Main Post 16 72 81 $31,937 14,374 MICROSURFACING

TAYLOR RD LINCOLN BLVD BLISS RD FHA442 10 1,162 18 20,916 R AC MP - Main Post 80 78 86 $22,377 14,793 MICROSURFACING

GRAHAM ST LINCOLN BLVD MORAGA AVE FHA445 10 1,637 32 52,384 C AC MP - Main Post 39 72 81 $56,041 14,374 MICROSURFACING

HALLECK ST LINCOLN BLVD FRENCH CT FHA452 10 415 38 15,770 C AC MP - Main Post 58 72 81 $16,871 14,374 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GORGAS AVE EAST ENTRANCE KENDALL DR FHA455 10 1,262 50 63,100 C AC 33 72 81 $67,505 14,384 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

GEN KENNEDY AVE EDIE ROAD BIRMINGHAM

PARKING

FHA458 30 200 34 6,800 R AC/AC 79 80 88 $7,275 15,680 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BATTERY CAULFIELD

RD

WASHINGTON

BLVD

BLDG 1450 FHA603 10 412 24 9,888 C AC/AC 86 80 88 $10,579 18,397 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

PIPER LOOP DUDLEY RD END FHA615 30 559 20 11,180 R AC/AC 84 87 93 $11,961 16,355 MICROSURFACING

ROD RD STOREY AVE FC - Fort Scott

NORTH

STOREY AVE

SOUTH

FHA617 10 422 16 9,268 R AC 84 81 88 $9,915 14,631 MICROSURFACING

UPTON AVE RALSTON AVE STOREY AVE FHA620 20 1,478 45 66,510 C AC FC - Fort Scott 45 74 82 $71,153 14,393 MICROSURFACING

RALSTON AVE STOREY AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA627 10 3,168 25 81,626 C AC FC - Fort Scott 46 74 82 $87,324 14,393 MICROSURFACING

STOREY AVE LINCOLN BLVD FC - Fort Scott

WEST

RALSTON EAST FHA628 10 845 23 19,435 C AC/AC 93 77 85 $20,792 16,452 MICROSURFACING

STOREY AVE RUCKMAN LINCOLN BLVD FC - Fort Scott

EAST

FHA628 30 844 23 19,412 C AC/AC 93 77 85 $20,768 16,452 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

N 15TH AVE SOUTH

BOUNDARY

WEDEMEYER ST FHA630 10 317 22 6,974 C AC/AC 93 76 84 $7,461 15,437 MICROSURFACING

RUCKMAN AVE UPTON STOREY FHA642 20 645 24 15,480 C AC/AC FC - Fort Scott 93 77 85 $16,561 16,423 MICROSURFACING

CS - Cavalry

Stables

MCDOWELL AVE Lincoln Blvd Cowles St FHA657 10 748 32 23,936 C AC 27 72 81 $25,607 14,374 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 27 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2037

CS - Cavalry

Stables

MCDOWELL AVE Cowles St Mason St FHA657 20 807 32 25,824 C AC 89 77 85 $27,627 16,004 MICROSURFACING

EH - East

Housing

PRESIDIO

PROMENADE

LETTERMAN DR LETTERMAN DR FHA700 20 320 9 2,880 O AC 54 74 82 $3,082 11,717 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $755,121

HARDIE AVE PARKING FUNSTON AVE BLDG 50 900uP P1 562 40 22,484 O AC MP - Main Post 93 69 78 $42,094 6,286 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 558 PARKING RTE 015 PRESIDIO

BLVD

BLDG 558 901dP P1 250 40 10,000 O AC 69 63 73 $18,722 6,587 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

GENERAL KENNEDY

PARKING

GENERAL

KENNEDY AVE

O'REILLY AVE 901lP P1 107 100 10,700 O AC 89 68 78 $20,033 6,247 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1160

PARKING

RTE 455 GORGAS

AVE

BLDG 1160 901pP P1 127 40 5,098 O AC 94 69 78 $9,545 6,289 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1062

PARKING

RTE 459

THORNBURG RD

BIRMINGHAM

RD

901sP P1 262 40 10,469 O AC 94 69 78 $19,600 6,289 CAPE SEAL

BUILDING 1331 FC - Fort Scott

PARKING

RTE 623 KOBBE

AVE NORTHSIDE

TENNIS

OVERLOOK 1331

903qaP P1 467 40 18,695 O AC 94 69 78 $35,000 6,289 CAPE SEAL

PH - Public

Health Hospital

BUILDING 1818/1819

PARKING

RTE 428

WEDEMEYER ST

BLDG 1818 907cP P1 309 17 5,256 O AC 94 69 78 $9,841 6,289 CAPE SEAL

CS - Cavalry

Stables

PATTEN ST MCDOWELL AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA656 10 792 16 12,672 O AC 94 69 78 $23,724 6,289 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

PRESIDIO

PROMENADE

LINCOLN BLVD LINCOLN BLVD FHA700 40 1,310 13 17,030 O AC 94 69 79 $31,883 6,291 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

PRESIDIO

PROMENADE

MCDOWELL AVE LONG AVE FHA700 60 2,170 10 21,700 O AC 94 69 79 $40,626 6,291 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

PAUL GOOD FIELD

ACCESS

PORTOLA ST TRAIL FHA709 10 150 12 1,800 O AC 95 69 79 $3,370 6,293 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $254,438

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1513

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1513 906xlP P1 211 16 3,387 O AC 67 49 100 $25,364 6,435 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

EH - East

Housing

SIMONDS LOOP PRESIDIO BLVD

SOUTH

PRESIDIO BLVD

NORTH

FHA679 10 2,693 26 79,048 R AC 67 47 100 $591,962 6,513 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $617,326

EH - East

Housing

PRESIDIO BLVD SOUTH

ENTRANCE

LOMBARD ST FHA015 10 2,733 32 157,120 A AC 68 48 100 $1,372,716 8,950 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Treatment Total $1,372,716

Year 2037 Area Total 1,081,298 Year 2037 Total $2,999,601

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 28 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2038

BUILDING 222-229 MP - Main Post

PARKING

RTE 452 HALLECK

ST

BLDG 222-228 900eP P1 710 40 28,400 O AC/AC 96 77 85 $31,294 13,214 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 87 PARKING RTE 445 GRAHAM MP - Main Post

ST

BLDG 85-87 900jP P1 210 40 8,400 O AC 74 70 79 $9,256 13,350 MICROSURFACING

FITNESS PARKING RTE 015 PRESIDIO MP - Main Post

BLVD

END 900mP P1 315 60 18,900 O AC 86 81 88 $20,826 13,967 MICROSURFACING

BUILDING 50 PARKING RTE 013 MP - Main Post

ARGUELLO BLVD

BLDG 50 900tP P1 52 50 2,600 O AC 84 78 86 $2,865 13,346 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1527/1529

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1527-1529 906xdP P1 110 16 1,766 O AC 56 74 82 $1,946 11,376 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD PARK BLVD. BLDG. 401 FHA012 60 400 30 12,000 C AC 57 75 84 $13,223 13,870 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WEST PACIFIC AVE GATE ARGEULLO

BLVD

FHA014 020 1,305 24 31,320 C AC 51 74 82 $34,512 13,974 MICROSURFACING

PRESIDIO BLVD LETTERMAN DR MESA ST FHA015 25 1,436 33 47,388 A AC MP - Main Post 63 80 87 $52,217 18,437 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

LETTERMAN DR PRESIDIO BLVD LOMBARD ST FHA436 10 1,320 28 37,719 C AC/AC 52 75 84 $41,563 13,870 MICROSURFACING

SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD RILEY AVE FHA437 10 315 31 9,765 C AC MP - Main Post 57 75 84 $10,761 13,870 MICROSURFACING

FUNSTON AVE MORAGA AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA448 10 1,637 32 52,384 C AC MP - Main Post 73 74 82 $57,722 13,974 MICROSURFACING

HALLECK ST FRENCH CT MASON ST FHA452 20 730 38 27,740 C AC MP - Main Post 58 75 84 $30,567 13,870 MICROSURFACING

CF - Crissy

Field

MASON ST HALLECK ST MCDOWELL AVE FHA602 20 3,850 38 146,300 A AC 65 76 84 $161,208 19,851 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

PIPER LOOP DEEMS RD DUDLEY RD FHA615 20 550 16 17,744 R AC/AC 86 80 88 $19,553 13,250 MICROSURFACING

STOREY AVE RALSTON EAST RUCKMAN FHA628 20 845 23 19,435 C AC FC - Fort Scott 52 74 82 $21,416 13,974 MICROSURFACING

INFANTRY TERRACE SHERIDAN AVE MORAGA FHA668 10 600 23 13,800 C AC MP - Main Post 58 75 84 $15,207 13,870 MICROSURFACING

PH - Public

Health Hospital

ANZA TRAIL SPUR WEDEMEYER AVE WEDEMEYER

PARKING

FHA708 10 80 6 480 O AC 84 71 80 $529 10,750 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $524,665

BUILDING 210 PARKING LINCOLN BLVD BLDG 210 (POST MP - Main Post

OFFICE/VISITOR'

S CENTER)

900gP P1 353 40 14,105 O AC 96 69 78 $27,199 6,092 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1028

SERVICE

RTE 458 GIRARD

RD

BLDG 1028 901hP P1 516 16 8,255 O AC 77 67 77 $15,919 6,022 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1163/67/69/70

PARKING

RTE 455 GORGAS

AVE

BLDGS 1167-

1170

901qP P1 1,552 40 62,071 O AC 94 69 78 $119,693 6,086 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1029

PARKING

RTE 458 GIRARD

RD

BLDG 1029 901vP P1 2,028 40 81,131 O AC 95 69 78 $156,447 6,089 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

BUILDING 808/809

PARKING

RTE 451

FERNANDEZ ST

BLDG 808 902jP P1 93 40 3,708 O AC 75 65 75 $7,151 5,948 CAPE SEAL

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1515

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1515 906xjP P1 106 16 1,702 O AC 75 64 74 $4,064 4,949 CAPE SEAL

MARTINEZ ST FUNSTON AVE PRESIDIO BLVD FHA454 10 686 12 8,232 R AC MP - Main Post 75 65 75 $15,874 5,948 CAPE SEAL

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 29 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2038

PH - Public

Health Hospital

ANZA TRAIL 14TH AVE WEDEMEYER ST FHA703 10 1,200 8 9,600 O AC 78 68 77 $18,512 6,062 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $364,859

BUILDING 135 WEST MP - Main Post

PARKING

RTE 441 FISHER

LOOP

BLDG 135 900oP P2 431 40 17,260 O AC 69 48 100 $133,132 6,314 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

LC - Letterman

Complex

KENDALL DR EDIE RD GORGAS AVE FHA460 10 370 20 7,400 R AC 70 49 100 $57,079 6,251 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

BA - Baker

Beach

BOWLEY ST LINCOLN BLVD

NORTH

LINVOLN BLVD

SOUTH

FHA690 10 1,455 35 50,925 R AC 67 45 100 $392,800 6,416 2.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $583,011

FRENCH CT GRAHAM ST HALLECK ST FHA453 10 305 24 7,320 C AC MP - Main Post 42 67 100 $36,297 9,483 1.5 INCH OVERLAY

Treatment Total $36,297

EH - East

Housing

MACARTHUR AVE PRESIDIO BLVD EL POLIN LOOP FHA016 10 2,323 27 66,986 C AC 76 47 100 $590,495 6,532 CIR w/ OVERLAY

Treatment Total $590,495

Year 2038 Area Total 814,836 Year 2038 Total $2,099,327

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2039

BUILDING 36/37 MP - Main Post

PARKING

RTE 445 GRAHAM

ST

BLDG 36 900xP P1 430 40 17,213 O AC/AC 95 75 83 $19,536 12,812 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1567-73 ODD

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1567-1573 906ccP P1 416 15 6,243 O AC 95 76 84 $7,086 11,712 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1552-58

EVEN PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1552-1558 906cdP P1 333 15 5,003 O AC 95 76 84 $5,679 11,712 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING

1582/84/61/63/65 PARK

STILLWELL RD PERSHING DR 906ceP P1 865 15 12,978 O AC 95 76 84 $14,730 11,712 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1546-50

EVEN PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1548 906cfP P1 309 15 4,640 O AC 95 76 84 $5,267 11,712 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1555-59 ODD

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1555 906cgP P1 299 15 4,990 O AC 95 76 84 $5,664 11,712 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1530-44

EVEN PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG

1534/1542/1544

906chP P1 913 15 13,703 O AC 95 76 84 $15,553 11,712 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1549

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1551 906ciP P1 245 15 3,678 O AC 95 76 84 $4,175 11,712 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING

1528/1545/1547PARKIN

G

PERSHING DR BLDG 1547 906cjP P1 487 15 7,317 O AC 95 76 84 $8,305 11,712 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 30 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2039

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1524/1526

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1524-1526 906xcP P1 226 16 3,620 O AC 94 76 84 $4,109 11,717 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1506/1508

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1506-1508 906xnP P1 244 16 3,910 O AC 95 76 84 $4,438 11,712 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1591

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1591 906yaP P1 311 15 4,672 O AC 94 76 84 $5,303 11,717 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WEST PACIFIC AVE ARGUELLO BLVD PRESIDIO BLVD FHA014 030 3,512 24 84,290 C AC 62 75 84 $95,666 13,466 MICROSURFACING

LC - Letterman

Complex

OREILLY AVE EDIE ROAD GORGAS AVE FHA614 20 155 21 3,255 C AC 94 72 81 $3,695 12,085 MICROSURFACING

HARRISON BLVD WASHINGTON FC - Fort Scott

BLVD

KOBBE AVE FHA636 10 581 24 13,944 R AC/AC 84 76 84 $15,826 12,145 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

AMATURY LOOP PARK BLVD

SOUTH

PARK BLVD

NORTH

FHA640 10 1,267 22 45,696 R AC/AC 96 75 83 $51,863 12,971 MICROSURFACING

HOFFMAN ST ARMISTEAD RD LINCOLN BLVD FHA652 10 1,109 24 26,616 R AC/AC FC - Fort Scott 95 75 84 $30,208 12,898 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

NAUMAN RD WASHINGTON

BLVD

END FHA665 10 1,214 12 14,568 R AC/AC 92 77 85 $16,535 11,758 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $313,638

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 610 WEST

PARKING

RTE 602 MASON

ST

BLDG 610 900aP P1 1,074 41 44,034 O AC 80 68 78 $87,460 5,888 CAPE SEAL

TAYLOR ROAD MP - Main Post

PARKING

RTE 442, TAYLOR

RD

BLDG 116 900hP P1 992 40 39,685 O AC 78 66 76 $78,822 5,819 CAPE SEAL

BUILDING 67 PARKING RTE 454 MP - Main Post

MARTINEZ AVE

BLDG 67 900wP P1 215 40 8,600 O AC 81 69 78 $17,082 5,892 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

BUILDING 779 PARKING RTE 674 MORTON

ST

BLDG 779 902ibP P1 63 40 2,508 O AC 72 61 71 $4,982 5,576 CAPE SEAL

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 300 PARKING ARGUELLO END 906kP P1 1,916 24 45,984 O AC 77 66 75 $113,078 4,672 CAPE SEAL

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1511

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1511 906xmP P1 273 16 4,370 O AC 74 63 73 $8,680 5,660 CAPE SEAL

PH - Public

Health Hospital

BUILDING 1808 SOUTH

PARKING

RTE 428

WEDEMEYER ST

BLDG 1808 907abP P2 771 40 30,843 O AC 92 66 75 $61,260 5,792 CAPE SEAL

PH - Public

Health Hospital

WEDEMEYER PARKING RTE 428

WEDEMEYER ST

END 907acP P1 988 35 34,580 O AC 90 65 75 $68,682 5,771 CAPE SEAL

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 1183-85

PARKING

EAST OF

MARSHALL

BLDG 1184 AND

1185

909mP P1 2,014 40 80,550 O AC 77 65 75 $159,987 5,777 CAPE SEAL

PF - Presidio

Forest

INSPIRATION POINT RTE 013

ARGUELLO BLVD

INSPIRATION

POINT

910bP P1 532 40 21,290 O AC 73 61 72 $42,286 5,599 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

GEN KENNEDY AVE TORNEY AVE EDIE ROAD FHA458 20 592 34 20,128 R AC 76 65 74 $39,978 5,744 CAPE SEAL

OWEN ST GRAHAM ST ANZA ST FHA6145 10 142 26 3,692 R AC MP - Main Post 74 62 72 $9,079 4,559 CAPE SEAL

HITCHCOCK ST PARK BLVD HARRISON BLVD FHA638 10 2,640 18 49,028 R AC FC - Fort Scott 76 65 74 $97,379 5,744 CAPE SEAL

THOMAS AVE INFANTRY MP - Main Post

TERRACE

ARGUELLO

BLVD

FHA669 10 1,373 14 19,222 R AC 74 63 73 $38,179 5,660 CAPE SEAL

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 31 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2039

EH - East

Housing

CLARK ST LIGGETT AVE

LOOP

LIGGETT AVE FHA677 10 845 15 12,675 R AC 80 68 77 $25,175 5,886 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

RUGER ST SIMONDS LOOP LOMBARD ST FHA685 10 1,395 29 41,884 R AC 73 62 72 $83,189 5,617 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $935,298

Year 2039 Area Total 735,409 Year 2039 Total $1,248,936

Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2040

LC - Letterman

Complex

BUILDING 1013

PARKING

RTE 457 TORNEY

AVE

BLDG 1013 901fcP P1 34 40 1,372 O AC 66 78 86 $1,604 10,246 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1535-43 ODD

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1535-1543 906xaP P1 896 16 14,342 O AC 95 74 83 $16,766 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1533

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1533 906xbP P1 151 16 2,431 O AC 95 74 83 $2,842 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1520

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1520 906xeP P1 274 16 4,398 O AC 95 74 83 $5,142 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1525

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1525 906xfP P1 107 16 1,726 O AC 95 74 83 $2,018 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1518/1580

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1518/1580 906xgP P1 190 16 3,050 O AC 95 74 83 $3,566 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1517/1519

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1517-1519 906xiP P1 279 16 4,472 O AC 95 74 83 $5,228 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1510-14

EVEN PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1510-1514 906xkP P1 392 16 6,272 O AC 95 74 83 $7,332 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1504

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1504 906xqP P1 156 16 2,501 O AC 95 74 83 $2,924 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1503-7 ODD

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1503-1507 906xrP P1 627 16 10,035 O AC 95 74 83 $11,731 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1502

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1502 906xsP P1 117 16 1,887 O AC 95 74 83 $2,206 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1501

PARKING

PERSHING DR BLDG 1501 906xtP P1 127 16 2,045 O AC 95 74 83 $2,391 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1592/1594

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1592/1594 906ybP P1 183 15 2,748 O AC 95 74 83 $3,213 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1587/1589

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1587/1589 906ycP P1 314 15 4,717 O AC 95 74 83 $5,515 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1588/1590

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1588/1590 906ydP P1 408 15 6,120 O AC 95 74 83 $7,155 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1583/1585

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1583/1585 906yeP P1 257 15 3,861 O AC 95 74 83 $4,514 11,457 MICROSURFACING

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 32 MTC StreetSaver
Area ID

Year:

Road Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC

Surface

Type Cost Rating Treatment

Current

Length Width Area PCI

PCI

Before

PCI

After

Treatment

2040

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1586

PARKING

STILLWELL RD BLDG 1586 906yfP P1 106 15 1,594 O AC 95 74 83 $1,864 11,457 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

PARK BLVD WASHINGTON

BLVD

LINCOLN BLVD FHA011 30 2,695 39 105,105 C AC 72 78 86 $122,869 12,655 MICROSURFACING

PS - Presidio

Hill

WASHINGTON BLVD KOBBE AVE IMMIGRANT

POINT

FHA012 20 1,290 30 38,700 C AC 63 75 84 $45,241 13,074 MICROSURFACING

INFANTRY TERRACE MORAGA ARGUELLO FHA668 20 2,146 23 49,358 C AC MP - Main Post 73 79 87 $57,700 12,149 MICROSURFACING

Treatment Total $311,821

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 610 EAST

PARKING

RTE 602 MASON

ST

BLDG 610 900bP P1 500 210 105,000 O AC 81 68 77 $214,805 5,697 CAPE SEAL

BUILDING 38 PARKING MESA ST BUILDING 38 900kbP P1 205 25 5,125 O AC MP - Main Post 84 69 78 $10,485 5,748 CAPE SEAL

BUILDING 385 PARKING RTE 449 MORAGA MP - Main Post

AVE

BLDG 387 900qP P1 637 40 25,488 O AC 48 69 78 $64,558 4,943 CAPE SEAL

LC - Letterman

Complex

LOMBARD ST PULLOUT PARKINGRTE 438

LOMBARD ST

EAST

ENTRANCE

901bP P1 69 40 2,756 O AC 84 69 78 $5,639 5,735 CAPE SEAL

WOOL CT UPTON AVE END 903rP 10 279 31 14,283 R AC FC - Fort Scott 51 69 78 $36,177 4,943 CAPE SEAL

PS - Presidio

Hill

BUILDING 1449/1450

PARKING

RTE 603 BATTERY

CAULFIELD

BLDG 1449 906ecP P1 44 30 1,330 O AC 84 69 78 $2,721 5,736 CAPE SEAL

LO - Lobos

Creek

BUILDING 1750

PARKING

RTE 010 LINCOLN

W. ENTRANCE

BLDG 1750 908aP P1 1,973 40 78,930 O AC 51 69 78 $199,918 4,943 CAPE SEAL

CF - Crissy

Field

PALACE OF FINE ART

PARKING

PALACE DRIVE PALACE DRIVE 909aP P1 2,033 40 81,350 O AC 81 68 77 $166,423 5,697 CAPE SEAL

CF - Crissy

Field

BUILDING 649-51

PARKING

MASSON ST BLDG 649-651 909fP P1 565 40 22,580 O AC 54 69 78 $57,192 4,943 CAPE SEAL

PF - Presidio

Forest

WASHINGTON BLVD LINCOLN BLVD KOBBE AVE FHA012 10 480 32 15,360 C AC 94 67 76 $32,920 5,199 CAPE SEAL

RILEY AVE SHERIDAN AVE LINCOLN BLVD FHA616 10 422 18 7,596 R AC MP - Main Post 83 69 78 $15,540 5,720 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

LIGGETT AVE PRESIDIO BLVD END OF LOOP FHA675 10 1,637 20 32,740 R AC 78 65 74 $66,979 5,579 CAPE SEAL

EH - East

Housing

SIBLEY RD LIGGETT AVE

LOOP

MORTON ST FHA676 10 1,267 11 13,937 R AC 49 69 78 $35,301 4,943 CAPE SEAL

PF - Presidio

Forest

ROB HILL

CAMPGROUND PATH

CENTRAL

MAGAZINE

END FHA705 10 1,055 12 12,660 O AC 92 68 77 $25,900 5,715 CAPE SEAL

PH - Public

Health Hospital

ANZA TRAIL SPUR WEDEMEYER AVE WEDEMEYER

PARKING

FHA708 20 200 6 1,200 O AC 84 69 78 $2,455 5,736 CAPE SEAL

Treatment Total $937,013

Year 2040 Area Total 687,069 Year 2040 Total $1,248,834

Grand Total Section Area: 16,097,325 Grand Total $35,588,081

Interest: 3.00%

Presidio of San Francisco Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment

Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 2/1/2021

Scenario: 2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then

Maintain

Scenarios Criteria:

** - Treatment from Project Selection 33 MTC StreetSaver
APPENDIX G 

 
Treatment Maps 

Scenario 1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50% 

2021 

 
Scenario Treatments

2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then Maintain - 2021 Project Period - Printed: 2/22/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Test

Feature Legend

2.5 INCH OVERLAY

CAPE SEAL

CIR w/ OVERLAY

MICROSURFACING

MILL & OVERLAY

RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
Treatment Maps

Scenario 1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50%

2022

 
Scenario Treatments

2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then Maintain - 2022 Project Period - Printed: 2/22/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Test

Feature Legend

1.5 INCH OVERLAY

2.5 INCH OVERLAY

CAPE SEAL

CIR w/ OVERLAY

MICROSURFACING
Treatment Maps 

Scenario 1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50% 

2023 

 
Scenario Treatments

2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then Maintain - 2023 Project Period - Printed: 2/22/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Test

Feature Legend

1.5 INCH OVERLAY

2.5 INCH OVERLAY

CAPE SEAL

CIR w/ OVERLAY

MICROSURFACING
Treatment Maps 

Scenario 1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50% 

2024 

 
Scenario Treatments

2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then Maintain - 2024 Project Period - Printed: 2/22/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Test

Feature Legend

1.5 INCH OVERLAY

2.5 INCH OVERLAY

CAPE SEAL

CIR w/ OVERLAY

MICROSURFACING
Treatment Maps 

Scenario 1: Reduce Deferred Maintenance by 50% 

2025 
Scenario Treatments

2021 S1: Reduce DM by 50% Then Maintain - 2025 Project Period - Printed: 2/22/2021

Presidio of San Francisco

Test

Feature Legend

2.5 INCH OVERLAY

CAPE SEAL

CIR w/ OVERLAY
Appendix F: Parking Enforcement Update
Memorandum

Date: May 15, 2021

To: Prakash Pinto, Director of Planning & Compliance

Via:

From: Emily Beaulac, Transportation Operations Specialist 

Re: License Plate Recognition Parking Management 

Purpose

The Trust has the opportunity to upgrade the parking management program by transitioning from “payand-display” or printed permits to “pay-by-plate”, purchasing parking by license plate number. The 

parking industry is transitioning away from pay-and-display because of the various advantages of payby-plate. This memo outlines:

• The current parking management program and the disadvantages

• The advantages of switching to pay-by-plate 

• The costs associated with the pay-by-plate 

• How enforcement must change and estimated costs of a new enforcement program

Current Parking Management Program

There are approximately 7,500 parking spaces in the Presidio (Area B)that fall into three categories:

1) Paid Public Parking

a. Over 3,300 of the parking spaces in non-residential areas of the Presidio require a fee. 

Day-use or hourly permits can be purchased from one of the 144 pay-and-display pay 

stations located throughout the park and then displayed in the car windshield. 

b. Non-residential tenants and their employees may also purchase parking permits from 

the Presidio parking office. The parking office sells both monthly and daily parking 

permits. The number of monthly parking passes available for purchase is designated 

within each non-residential lease and there is no cost savings associated with 

purchasing a monthly permit to support the Trust’s TDM goals and discourage nonresidential tenants from driving every day. Daily permits are sold in booklets of 20 

passes. These options alleviate the need to use the parking pay station.

2) Residential 

a. One designated, exclusive-use parking space is included with each residential lease, free 

of charge. Designated spaces can be a garage, driveway, carport, or on-street numbered 

parking space. Parking permits (hang tags) are issued for any designated space not 

located in a garage or driveway. 

b. Additional hanging parking permits may be purchased by residents. The cost for each 

additional parking permit is $50 per month and a new tiered pricing structure is being 

developed to charge incrementally more for each additional vehicle per household. 

3) Free Public Parking

a. Unpaid parking areas include the Sports Basement parking lot, Cavalry Bowl, Bowley 

Street, Lincoln Blvd between 25th Avenue and Storey Ave, Building 1750, Building 1450, 
Inspiration Point, West Pacific Avenue and various small parking areas near trailheads or 

overlooks. Current Approach: Pay-and-Display

Pay-and-display parking requires issuing paper permits – either from pay stations or hang tags. This 

parking management approach has cost impacts and impacts on the users. 

• Parkers must purchase their permits from a pay station and return to their vehicle to display 

their permit in their dashboard. This requires that pay stations be located close enough together

to allow customers to walk to a pay station and return to their vehicle. Each pay station costs 

$49/month to operate, which pays for the electronic processing and transmission of fees as well 

as any additional maintenance or support that cannot be resolved by Ace Parking. A new pay 

station costs approximately $7,500. In addition to operating and purchase costs, pay-and-display 

stations require paper and ink to print permits. 

• Motorcycles and scooters do not have a secure way of displaying a permit. Unlike traditional 

vehicles, displaying a permit is more difficult on a motorcycle or scooter because there is not an 

easy way to securely affix the permit.

• The purchase of monthly hang tag permits and books of daily scratch off permits for nonresidential zones cost the Trust approximately $10,000 per year. 

Current Parking Enforcement

Parking enforcement is currently performed by US Park Police (USPP). Parking compliance for paid public 

parking was observed in 2019 to be 64% in the Main Post and Letterman areas. Both paid public parking 

and residential parking requires the person conducting enforcement to visually confirm the presence of 

a valid parking permit. The USPP officer must exit their vehicle and maneuver through the parking area 

to inspect each permit, either hanging from rear view mirror or in the windshield. The officer then issues 

a handwritten citation and back at the office, additional paperwork must be completed to enter the 

citation in the system. 

Current Enforcement Costs

USPP does not regularly schedule parking enforcement. The Trust pays USPP to conduct parking 

enforcement on overtime hours and officers conduct enforcement when it is convenient for their 

schedules. The timing of parking enforcement by USPP may not align with high parking demand. The 

Trust pays $100/hour for enforcement and budgets approximately $100,000/year for these duties. 

Proposed Changes: Pay-by-Plate

Pay-by-plate would increase compliance and allow the Trust to reduce the number of pay stations in the 

park. Trust staff would work with Ace Parking, the Trust’s parking management company, to pilot this

approach in the Tides parking lot before implementing park-wide. Pay-by-plate is used in other 

jurisdictions, including the SFMTA, mostly in parking lots. It has several advantages over pay-and-display.

In recent years, the Trust has upgraded enough parking machines to be pay-by-plate compatible. 
Figure 1: Using Pay-by-Plate Technologies

Advantages of Pay by Plate

1) Compatible with mobile payment options. The parking management contractor for the Presidio, 

Ace Parking, has an existing parking application, which can be accessed from a mobile browser, that 

users can use to pay for parking through their phone. This mobile payment option is currently being 

used by NPS at Muir Woods. Mobile payment options include downloading a smartphone app or 

using your mobile browser (no download necessary) to pay for parking. 

2) Convenience. Users who choose to purchase parking from the pay stations will not have to return to 

their vehicle to display their permit. Both this and the mobile payment option will save users time 

and may increase compliance. 

3) Fewer meters. Assuming 50 percent of users will opt to use the mobile payment option, this will 

allow for a reduction in the number of pay stations in a given area. This will reduce Trust annual 

costs for maintaining and operating the pay stations as well as reduce the number of stations that 

need to be periodically replaced. 

4) Better enforcement. Pay-by-plate parking is monitored and enforced using vehicle-mounted license 

plate recognition (LPR) technology. that confirms payment compliance without enforcement 

officers leaving the vehicle. License plate reader technology can also be paired with electronic 

ticketing technologies that print parking tickets and automatically upload the data, which will reduce 

paperwork. Changes to parking enforcement are not within the purview of the Trust Transportation 

Office parking management responsibilities but pay-by-plate allows for more effective and efficient 

enforcement by others. This video explains how LPR can help save park enforcement officers time: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kybaas8Qrn4

Mobile Payment Options

The new mobile payment option will allow users to pay using 

either Mobile Web Pay or a Presidio parking app. 

Mobile Payment solutions enhance cash controls, reduce 

security risk to personnel, and reduce resources required for 

collections, reconciliation, and banking related activities. 

Find a parking space and 

park your car. Note your 

license plate number.

Use your phone to pay for 

parking with mobile pay or 

download the app

Walk to your destination! 

No need to return to car.

Walk to the pay station and 

enter a duration your 

license plate number
Added Costs

To realize the full benefit of pay-by-plate and mobile payment options, the Trust must invest in LPR 

technologies to conduct enforcement. LPR enforcement can be performed on foot with handheld 

devices, which require the user to scan each individual license plate. LPR equipment that is mounted to 

a vehicle is more effective because the user can scan a large parking area in minutes but is more 

expensive. Purchasing both a vehicle-mounted LPR system and handheld devices would allow more 

users conduct parking enforcement than with just one vehicle system.

Estimated Start-Up Costs for LPR Enforcement 

Service or Hardware Potential Costs

Vehicle mounted LPR equipment ~$15,000 per vehicle 

Rugged tablet or workbook installed inside 

vehicle

~$4,000 per workbook

Installation, training and software fees ~$4,000

Handheld LPR devices $1,000 per unit (2 assumed) 

Total ~$34,000

Annual licensing and maintenance costs ~$10,000

Electronic Ticketing

Currently, parking citations are handwritten by USPP officers and the parking citation revenue is 

collected by the federal court system. LPR enforcement pairs well with electronic citation solutions – the 

data collected from the LPR technology can “autofill” into a ticketing software application. The vendors 

that provide LPR technologies do not have citation solutions so there must be an additional contract for 

these services. However, the equipment installed inside a vehicle for LPR enforcement (like a tablet or 

Toughbook) and the LPR handheld devices can also be used to operate electronic ticketing software. 

Purchasing and deploying electronic ticketing to replace handwritten citations is an additional task with 

added expenses but is not required for the pay-by-plate transition. The Trust is currently researching 

how the agency might be able to collect revenue from parkers not paying for parking. Investing in 

electronic ticketing software would be essential for effective enforcement and collection of revenue 

from ticketing. In the meantime, USPP could continue to use their existing citation system but 

incorporate LPR solutions to find vehicles that are in violation. 

Electronic Ticketing Costs

Service or Hardware Estimated Costs

Handheld ticketing hardware & printers ~$3,000 per unit (2 assumed) 

Software, project management & training ~$14,000

Total ~$19,000

Annual licensing and maintenance ~$2,000

Costs vary based by vendor and we are still compiling quotes from potential vendors. Some cities and 

jurisdictions include a “user fee” or associated charge to those who receive citations to help offset the 

costs of electronic ticketing systems. 
Impacts on Parking Revenue 

The following table summarizes actual “transient” parking revenue 2017 – 2019 as well as a range of 

estimated parking revenues for 2022 – 2025 for three scenarios for increasing payment compliance. 

Notes about the table:

• Revenues from 2020 and 2021 are not included because of Covid-19 and because LPR 

equipment will not be fully implemented in 2021

• Transient parking revenue includes hourly and daily parking, not monthly permits nor citation 

revenue

• The table assume a conservative increase in baseline parking demand (held constant across 

scenarios as it is less under Trust control and this analysis is focused on the effect of Trust 

enforcement on compliance, not on the effect of new pricing policies)

• Parking revenue is estimated for low, medium, and high scenarios for how much payment 

compliance increases

• All revenue estimates are rounded to the nearest 100,000 to make the table more legible and to 

not imply false precision 

These revenue projections make the following assumptions:

• Parking revenue in 2022 will be the same as 2019 (ie, return to pre-Covid levels in 2021 into 

2022)

• Parking demand (and therefore revenue) will increase by ~3% a year after 2021 (either as a 

result of changes in demand and/or Trust pricing strategies). This simple analysis holds this 

value steady for all scenarios 

• Payment compliance is currently approximately 64% 

• Transitioning to LPR and assuming (hypothetically) the current level of enforcement staffing will 

increase payment compliance rate by either 3%, 6%, or 9% to 67%, 70% or 73%

• The increased flexibility, control, responsiveness, and performance of contract enforcement, as 

well as higher level of enforcement staffing (in terms of hours of enforcement per week), will 

increase payment compliance rate by an additional 3%, 6%, or 9%

• For this analysis, the scenarios for increasing payment compliance combine the assumed effects 

of LPR and the assumed increases related to a contracted enforcement service:

o “Low” – Assumes payment compliance rate increases 6% to ~70%

o “Medium” – Assumes payment compliance rate increases 12% to ~76%

o “High” – Assumes payment compliance rate increases 18% to ~82%

• For each scenario, the assumed percent increase in compliance is used to estimate the increase 

in revenue by multiplying that year’s revenue by the assumed percent increase in compliance. 

For example, if the Trust increases compliance from 64% to 80%, it will increase compliance and 

therefore revenue by 25% (ie, 16/64=0.25). Similarly, if the Trust increased compliance from 

50% to 100%, revenue would increase by 100%, not 50%. This means that for each scenario, 

revenues will increase over the baseline as a result of higher compliance:

o “Low” – Assumes payment compliance increases revenues by approximately 9%
o “Medium” – Assumes payment compliance rate increases by approximately 19%

o “High” – Assumes payment compliance rate increases by approximately 28%

Parking gross revenue estimates for low, medium, and high scenarios for payment compliance

2017 2018 2019 2022 2023 2024 2025

Actual + projected 

baseline revenues

$2,600,000 $2,800,000 $2,900,000 $3,000,000 $3,100,000 $3,200,000 $3,300,000 

“Low” compliance 

increase

$3,300,000 $3,400,000 $3,500,000 $3,600,000 

“Med.” compliance 

increase

$3,600,000 $3,700,000 $3,800,000 $3,900,000 

“High” compliance 

increase

$3,800,000 $4,000,000 $4,100,000 $4,200,000 

LPR Pilot

To test the system, parking machines in the Tides lot would be reprogrammed to allow users to pay for 

parking by entering the license plate number at the parking machine or into a mobile app. The 3-month 

pilot project will test the use of license plate recognition (LPR) technology and mobile payment options 

in the Tides parking lot. The parking signage in the lot would also need to be changed to reflect the 

change in payment options. The Tides parking lot has been selected as an appropriate place to conduct a 

pilot of the pay-by-plate technologies because most of the users are employees of Tides and can be 

easily contacted for instructions and feedback. During the pilot, we hope to measure compliance rates 

and revenue changes in the parking compared to pay-and-display management. Feedback from the 

users and their customer satisfaction with the changes will also be documented. 

Key Takeaways

• Pay-by-plate is more customer friendly, allowing for mobile payment options, reduceing the 

need for pay stations throughout the park, and eliminating the need to return to one’s vehicle to 

display a payment receipt.

• The costs of implementing LPR enforcement technologies are approximately $24,000 in the first 

year. The reoccurring annual costs to maintain and operate the system are approximately 

$10,000 per year. 

• The installation and purchase costs of vehicle mounted LPR equipment are sizable at 

approximately $20,000 per vehicle. If the Trust intends to conduct their own parking 

enforcement, there should be a dedicated parking enforcement vehicle that is operated by the 

Trust. This would avoid an interim step of providing USPP with vehicle LPR equipment to attach 

to an existing USPP patrol vehicle.

• Electronic ticketing is a recommended addition to a LPR system because it reduces paperwork 

and can utilize the same technologies needed for the LPR enforcement. However, it is not a 

necessary component in starting pay-by-plate parking management. 
• The increased efficiency of LPR will result in higher parking compliance rates. The estimated

increase in revenue is projected to be between $100,000 and $700,000 per year, depending on 

the effectiveness of enforcement. Compliance and revenues will increase if enforcement can be 

improved with increased flexibility, control, responsiveness, performance, and number of hours 

spent on enforcement. These improvements require the Trust to either conduct their own 

parking enforcement or hire a contract to provide parking enforcement. 
Appendix G: Proposed Parking Policies
Memorandum

Date: June 3, 2021

To: Prakash Pinto, Director of Planning & Compliance

Via:

From: Amy Marshall, Transportation Manager

Emily Beaulac, Transportation Operations Specialist

Re: LoTIS Parking Management Recommendations

Action Requested

Review and provide feedback on the proposed parking management changes and near-term

implementation schedule.

Background

Through the Long-Range Transportation Implementation Strategy (LoTIS), the Trust has identified 

proposed changes to the Trust’s parking management policies and practices to better achieve the 

Trust’s overall goals and take advantage of new parking management technologies. Switching to 

pay-by-plate and implementing a mobile payment option allows for more effective enforcement 

via license plate recognition (LPR). 

Trust staff believe that all parking-related projects will be included in the “short-term” list of 

projects in the LoTIS (i.e., implemented by 2027). The proposed changes described in more detail 

below fall into four categories:

1. Improve effectiveness of paid parking

2. Adjust parking rates based on demand

3. Improve communications and user experience

4. Facilitate improved enforcement of paid parking

Proposed phasing is sensitive to the shifting travel patterns following the COVID 19 pandemic. 

Park employees may commute to the park less frequently than they did previously. 
Proposed Parking Management Changes

Marshall, Beaulac

6/3/2021

Page 2 of 7

1. Improve effectiveness of paid parking 

How It Works Now Proposed Change Why?

1A Some parking is 

not managed

Reassess where to charge for parking 

The Trust should assess what additional on-street and lot parking should be 

managed to help achieve overall goals. Net capital and operating costs for new 

equipment will be minimized by parking revenue and license plate recognition 

technology (see 4B).

Fall 2021: Implement parking fees in the Sports Basement parking lot. 

Long-term: Implement fees in the Cavalry Stables area and other currently 

unregulated areas.

Unmanaged (and unpriced) parking encourages people to drive 

and reduces access to the Presidio by making it harder to find a 

parking space, running counter to Trust goals. Expanding paid 

parking will make the Trust’s parking management more complete, 

comprehensive, and effective.

1B Daily parking rate 

is set at 

approximately 5 

hours of parking

Phase out the daily rate

Feb 2022: Set daily rate at 6 hours of parking.

Long-term: Charge for parking only by the hour.

A daily rate provides a discount for those who commute by car. 

Charging by the hour is more equitable (by not favoring one group 

of drivers) and will no longer provide an incentive to commute by 

car. 

1C The Presidio (Area 

B) has 9 different 

non-residential 

parking price 

zones 

Reduce number of pricing zones

Fall 2021 – Fall 2022: In conjunction with the phased implementation of pay-byplate, reduce the number of pricing zones somewhat while still discouraging car 

trips within the Presidio and continuing to offer lower cost parking in more 

remote areas to distribute demand.

Fewer pricing zones will make it easier to communicate the extent 

and price for each zone, and may allow for greater differential in 

prices to make choices clearer and prices more effective.

1D Hourly rates do 

not vary by 

weekday vs. 

weekend 

Differ hourly rates for weekdays vs. weekends

In parking rate zones that have high parking demand on the weekends, charge 

higher rates to manage demand.

Feb 2022: Implement higher weekend rates in the Main Post and Crissy Field 

areas.

Better manage demand during busy times, which will ensure 

access by car and increase revenue while allowing lower prices 

during less busy times 
Proposed Parking Management Changes

Marshall, Beaulac

6/3/2021

Page 3 of 7

How It Works Now Proposed Change Why?

1F Rates are adjusted 

in $0.10/hr 

increments

Communicate rates by the hour and only use hourly rates that end in $0.50 or 

$1.00 increments

Feb 2022: Implement park-wide.

Make it easier for people to understand and compare rates at a 

glance. 

1G Rates do not 

change during 

special events 

Use higher hourly special event rates at all paid parking

Fall 2021 to Spring 2022: After implementation of pay-by-plate and mobile 

payment options, develop events rate calendar and establish rates in 

collaboration with Visitor Engagement. Establish the hourly rates that the Trust 

will use in some rate zones during special events, and periodically adjust those 

rates to find the lowest rate possible that achieves a minimum level of parking 

availability during most special events. 

Better manage demand during the busiest times, which will make 

it easier to find a parking space (for those who choose to drive), 

increase access, increase revenue, and better achieve overall 

transportation goals.
Proposed Parking Management Changes

Marshall, Beaulac

6/3/2021

Page 4 of 7

2. Adjust parking rates based on demand 

How It Works Now Proposed Change Why?

2A Parking rates are set to 

be approximately 20 

percent less than 

metered areas in 

surrounding San 

Francisco 

neighborhoods

Adjust rates based on parking demand to find lowest possible rate 

To adjust rates based on demand the Trust would identify a target peak 

occupancy range (e.g., 60-80%). When periodically adjusting rates, the Trust 

would increase rates by $0.50/hr in zones that are above target occupancy and 

decrease rates by $0.50/hr in zones that are below target occupancy. Trust 

CEO/Board would set a floor and ceiling for hourly rates – suggested floor of 

$2.00/hr and ceiling of $4.00/hr.

Utilizing a data-driven outcomes-based approach to adjusting 

prices will help the Trust achieve its goals for transportation 

and maximize revenue while finding the lowest rate possible 

that achieves a minimum level of availability (i.e., makes it 

easier to visitors to quickly find a parking space). 

2B Occupancy data 

gathered manually (1 

or 2 times per year)

Explore new source for occupancy data

The Trust should explore how to gather occupancy data with sufficient accuracy 

and granularity at the lowest cost. Options: manual occupancy data collection, 

estimate from payment data, use drone/aerial imagery, or obtain (if technically 

feasible) from parking enforcement license plate recognition (LPR) technology. 

High quality parking occupancy (demand) data is required to 

make demand-responsive parking rate adjustments. 

Which option is most cost effective will depend in part on how 

frequently the Trust would like to change prices and what is 

operationally feasible for Trust staff. 

2C Rates are adjusted 

every 12 months 

Adjust rates more frequently

Adjust rates up or down by $0.50/hour every 4 or 6 months rather than every 

12 if occupancy data reflects need for adjustments.

Adjusting rates more frequently will allow the Trust to more 

quickly find the lowest price possible that ensures that it is easy 

to find a parking space, and ensure that parking rates change 

not long after any changes to parking demand. 

2D Rate changes are 

approved by the 

Executive Team 

Delegate authority to approve rates to Chief Financial Officer (CFO) The Board 

or CEO should approve the rules for adjusting parking rates as well as a rate 

floor and ceiling, and then delegate authority to approve regular rate 

adjustments to the CFO, based on recommendations from the Transportation 

Manager. See recommendations for streamlining communication protocols for 

rate changes in 3A.

Delegating authority will reduce the administrative overhead 

for routine parking rate changes, and will allow parking 

management and rate adjustments to become a perfunctory 

administrative and operational task.

2E Time limits are used at 

paid parking 

Use time limits only in special cases; otherwise eliminate time limits. Use 

demand-responsive pricing adjusted every 4-6 months to maintain a minimum 

level of parking availability in all areas including those with high demand.

Time limits are sensible where pricing is not feasible (e.g., 

overlooks) or other special cases. Otherwise, demandresponsive pricing combined with effective enforcement (see 

4A-C) will effectively manage demand and ensure availability.
Proposed Parking Management Changes

Marshall, Beaulac

6/3/2021

Page 5 of 7

3. Improve communications and user experience 

How It Works Now Proposed Change Why?

3A Parking rates are posted on 

parking pay stations using decals.

A PDF map showing new parking 

rates is emailed to Trust 

employees and non-residential 

tenants at the beginning of each 

year before an annual rate 

change. 

The same PDF map of parking 

rates is available on the Trust 

website.

Use the screen of new parking pay stations rather than decals to 

communicate rates to reduce the operational burden of changing rates more 

frequently.

Improve the PDF map of parking rates to reflect new zones/rates as well as 

to make the map significantly easier to quickly understand.

Continue to email the PDF of parking rates shortly before each rate change 

as a means to communicate to the Trust’s most frequent parkers where they 

can find the lowest rates.

Have the Trust’s parking payment app also display the same (or similar) 

static map of rates as another means to make people aware of where parking 

is available and where they can find the lowest cost parking options. 

Communicating parking prices will help those 

prices to achieve Trust parking and transportation 

goals more effectively. Fewer zones and simpler 

rates will also be easier to communicate via a 

mobile payment app.

3B Information about the Trust’s 

parking management policies not 

readily available

Develop a comprehensive public-facing document that summarizes the how 

the Trust manages parking (e.g., policies, rules for changing rates, etc.) 

This document will increase transparency and trust 

among park visitors and employees, and serve as a 

useful internal resource for the Trust. 
Proposed Parking Management Changes

Marshall, Beaulac

6/3/2021

Page 6 of 7

4. Facilitate improved enforcement of paid parking

How It Works Now Proposed Change Why?

4A Parking citations are paid directly to US 

Federal Courts. 

Unknown consequences for those who 

do not pay parking citations.

Explore how to have (or increase) consequences for not paying 

for parking citations

If the Trust determines that citation payment compliance is low, 

then it could explore how to ensure non-payment has more 

effective consequences. 

The Trust would like to increase the percent of people who 

park that pay. Enforcement is effective for some people, but 

if not paying citations does not have any consequences, it is 

likely that some people (percent unknown) routinely do not 

pay for parking knowing that citations do not have 

consequences.

4B Parking enforcement must check 

parking receipt placed on a dashboard

Implement Pay-by-Plate and Enable enforcement via license 

plate recognition (LPR)

The new pay-by-plate parking payment approach the Trust plans 

to implement in 2021/22 will associate payment by app/phone or 

pay station to a vehicle’s license plate. 

Pay-by-plate will enable a much more efficient approach to 

enforcement using license plate recognition (LPR), either by 

equipment attached to enforcement vehicles or handheld tablets 

that scan license plates. 

Making the shift to a parking system based on license plates 

will allow the Trust to dramatically improve the efficiency 

and therefore effectiveness of parking enforcement. This 

will increase payment compliance, which will increase 

meter revenue and, more importantly, help the Trust 

achieve its goals.

4C United States Park Police (USPP) 

enforces paid parking (using USPP 

officers on overtime) when officers are 

available, not necessarily when 

enforcement is most needed. The Trust 

pays the USPP overtime rates for this 

enforcement. 

Hire a Trust employee to enforce parking and other duties

Enforcing paid parking via LPR is so efficient that effective 

enforcement will require less than one FTE, so that person could 

perform other duties such as community engagement and 

responding to other minor incidents.

Having a Trust employee enforce parking will provide the 

Trust more control, provide more effective enforcement, and 

be more cost-effective.
Proposed Parking Management Changes

Marshall, Beaulac

6/3/2021

Page 7 of 7

How It Works Now Proposed Change Why?

4D USPP uses handwritten tickets to issue 

parking citations. Parking citations 

require additional paperwork upon 

returning to the office. 

Implement electronic ticketing software to issue citations 

Electronic citations are compatible with but not included with LPR 

enforcement technology. Using the same hardware located in the 

vehicle or handheld devices, Bluetooth printers and ticketing 

software can automate issuance of parking citations. Typical fields 

like vehicle license plate, data and location are automatically filled. 

Electronic ticketing technology speeds up the process both in 

the field when issuing a ticket and automatically catalogs the 

data on the backend, reducing paperwork.

4E Parking citation revenue is collected by 

US Federal Courts. 

Collect parking citation revenue 

Create an internal system for issuing fees that allows the Trust to 

collect parking citation revenue. There are legal boundaries to 

setting up this system. 

Parking citation revenue could amount to hundreds of 

thousands of dollars in additional revenue for the Trust. 
Appendix H: PresidiGo Service Evaluation
PresidiGo Service Evaluation

Prepared for:

Presidio Trust

June 15, 2021

SF20-1126

 
Table of Contents

01 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................................2

Transportation Goals ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2

PresidiGo Service Goals......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2

Summary of Findings................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2

02 Existing Conditions..............................................................................................................................................4

2019 Route Summary................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4

Service Changes due to COVID-19 ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4

2019 Service Structure ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4

2019 Presidigo Route Performance ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5

Ridership Trends ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Productivity & Cost Effectiveness ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Rider Feedback.............................................................................................................................................................................................................8

Opportunities for Improvement .................................................................................................................................................................................. 9

Crissy Field Service Redundancy .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9

Weekday Midday Downtown Service.................................................................................................................................................................... 9

Improved Connections and Reliability Downtown............................................................................................................................................... 9

Inner Richmond Connection................................................................................................................................................................................. 9

One-Seat Ride........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 9

03 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................. 12

Service Recommendations..........................................................................................................................................................................................12

Downtown Route..................................................................................................................................................................................................12

Presidio Hills Route..............................................................................................................................................................................................12

Crissy Field Route.................................................................................................................................................................................................12

New Arguello Route..............................................................................................................................................................................................12

Cost Estimates.............................................................................................................................................................................................................15
Stop Improvement Program .......................................................................................................................................................................................15

Future Service Considerations................................................................................................................................................................................... 16

Appendices

Appendix A: Pre-COVID Ridership by Run

Appendix B: Proposed PresidiGo Schedules
List of Figures

Figure 1: Weekday Ridership in 2019................................................................................................................................................................................6

Figure 2: Weekend Ridership in 2019................................................................................................................................................................................7

Figure 3: Historic Operating Cost per Passenger..............................................................................................................................................................8

Figure 4: Downtown Route Alignment Options...............................................................................................................................................................13

Figure 5: Arguello Route Proposal ...................................................................................................................................................................................14

Figure 6. Existing stops on Letterman Drive ..................................................................................................................................................................16

Figure 7: One-Seat Ride Proposal ....................................................................................................................................................................................17

List of Tables

Table 1: Presidio Trust Strategic Goals .............................................................................................................................................................................2

Table 2: October 2019 Service............................................................................................................................................................................................5

Table 3: October 2019 Performance Comparison.............................................................................................................................................................8

Table 4: Performance of Bay Area Transit Systems ..........................................................................................................................................................8

Table 5: Service Proposal Cost Estimates ........................................................................................................................................................................15
Introduction 1

01 Introduction

"Columbus And Broadway, North Beach, San Francisco, CA, May 31, 2016" by Maggie Osterberg is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
2 LONG RANGE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

01 INTRODUCTION

The PresidiGo shuttle is a free service for residents, employees, and 

visitors to the Presidio. As a central part of the Presidio’s 

transportation system, its efficient and effective operation are central 

to accomplishing the Presidio Trust’s transportation goals. This 

service review will examine the existing performance of PresidiGo and 

propose short- and long-term recommendations for 

improving service.

TRANSPORTATION GOALS

The Presidio Trust has identified three strategic goals in support of its 

mission and vision. Transportation objectives were further identified 

in pursuit of each of the three goals.

Table 1: Presidio Trust Strategic Goals 

Goal Transportation Objectives 

Goal 1: As a national 

park, the Presidio will be 

visited and loved by all 

• Make it convenient to get to the 

Presidio’s most popular destinations 

without a car.

• Enhance the experience of traveling by 

foot, bike, or transit within the park.

Goal 2: The Presidio 

Trust will be a model of 

environmental 

stewardship

• Reduce the GHG emissions from trips 

to/from and within the Presidio.

• Minimize environmental impact of 

transportation-related infrastructure.

Goal 3: The Presidio 

Trust will exemplify 

operational excellence in 

public service 

• Maintain the existing network and 

transit infrastructure in a state of 

good repair. 

• Eliminate serious injuries from road 

collisions and tripping hazards.

• Reduce net cost to Trust of 

transportation network and services.

The PresidiGo shuttle plays a key role in meeting these objectives. A 

robust and effective PresidiGo system provides an essential alternative 

to driving for Presidio residents, employees, and visitors, reducing 

greenhouse gas emissions and improving accessibility for those who 

are unable to drive. Furthermore, as a cost-efficient, productive 

service, PresidiGo reduces the expense of transportation in the 

Presidio for both its riders and the Presidio Trust.

PresidiGo Service Goals 

In order to support the Presidio Trust’s strategic goals, the PresidiGo 

system should aim to:

• Provide convenient access to jobs and services for residents 

and employees

• Maximize ridership through efficient operations

• Encourage the shift away from private vehicles by providing 

a convenient and competitive service

• Remain cost-effective for the Presidio Trust

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Service and ridership data from 2019 indicate that PresidiGo 

continues to meet its service goals and provide a level of productivity

comparable to many Muni routes. The system would benefit from a 

few service modifications:

• Increasing midday frequency on the Downtown Route to 

support non-traditional commutes, access for visitors and 

access to services for Presidio residents

• Modifying stop locations on the Downtown Route to improve 

connections to the Salesforce Transit Center and the 

Central Subway

• Providing a new Arguello Route connecting the Main Post 

and Letterman District to services and high-capacity transit 

routes like the 28R in the Inner Richmond

• Implementing a stop improvement program within the 

Presidio to upgrade and standardize stop amenities, 

including shelters and signage, and assure accessibility for all

• Exploring a future combination of the Downtown and 

Presidio Hills Routes into a one-seat ride between Baker 

Beach and Downtown San Francisco

Proposed schedules and service hours with these modifications are in 

Appendix B.
Existing Conditions

3

02 Existing Conditions

"PresidiGo bus" by THE Holy Hand Grenade! is licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0
4 LONG RANGE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

02 EXISTING

CONDITIONS

This section provides an overview of transit service in the Presidio 

prior to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. 

2019 ROUTE SUMMARY

In 2019, PresidiGo operated three routes: 

• Downtown, connecting the Presidio Transit Center and the

Letterman District to Downtown San Francisco and the 

Salesforce Transit Center

• Presidio Hills, a loop connecting the southern half of the 

Presidio and Baker Beach to the Presidio Transit Center

• Crissy Field, a loop connecting the northern half of the 

Presidio and the Golden Gate Bridge to the Presidio 

Transit Center

Nearly all Presidio residents lived within a five-to-ten-minute walk of 

a bus stop. Notable exceptions include the East Housing neighborhood 

along MacArthur Ave, Portola St, and Liggett Ave, as well as portions 

of Infantry Terrace and Simonds Loop.

Muni and Golden Gate Transit supplemented service in the area with 

the following routes:

SF Muni Routes

• 28 19th Avenue, serving the Golden Gate Bridge and 

Richardson Avenue

• 29 Sunset, serving the Baker Beach area

• 30 Stockton, serving the Marina District just east of 

the Presidio

• 43 Masonic, serving the Presidio Blvd, Main Post, and 

Letterman areas

• 41 Union and 45 Union-Stockton, stopping just outside of 

the eastern entrance of the Presidio

• 76X Marin Headlands Express, stopping at the Golden Gate 

Bridge and Richardson Avenue on weekends only

Golden Gate Transit Routes

• Twenty-four routes stopped at the Golden Gate Bridge Toll 

Plaza and on Richardson Avenue with service to downtown 

San Francisco and various points in Marin and 

Sonoma Counties

Service Changes due to COVID-19 

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in substantial changes to travel 

behavior, the extent and duration of which remain unknown. In March 

2020, PresidiGo service was cut by 18% through service reductions 

during the commute periods. A month later, PresidiGo suspended the 

Crissy Field Route and decreased Downtown weekend service to 

hourly. In November 2020, weekend service on both the Downtown 

and Presidio Hills routes was suspended completely. 

In forming its Core Service Plan, Muni suspended the 41 Union and 

the portions of the 28 19th Avenue and 43 Masonic serving the 

Presidio. However, in September 2020, Muni extended the 30 

Stockton from its terminus in the Marina District into the Presidio 

along Mason Street, terminating at the Sports Basement parking lot. 

While it is likely that Muni will continue supporting the extension of 

the 30 Stockton, the return of other routes is uncertain. 

Golden Gate Transit reduced service through the Golden Gate Bridge 

toll plaza to only six routes, serving only the largest cities of Marin and 

Sonoma Counties. In April 2020, Golden Gate Transit began allowing 

rides between any San Francisco stops to augment reduced Muni 

service. Previously, it had only allowed travel to downtown San 

Francisco from the Golden Gate Toll Plaza and Richardson 

Avenue stops.

2019 SERVICE STRUCTURE

In 2019, PresidiGo service operated between 6:00 AM and 8:00 PM 

on weekdays and 9:00 AM and 6:30 PM on weekends. As shown in 

Table 2, headways ranged from 10 minutes to 60 minutes on the 

Downtown Route and 15 minutes to 30 minutes on the Presidio Hills

Route. The Crissy Field Route operated at a regular 30-minute 

headway throughout the day.
Existing Conditions 5

Table 2: October 2019 Service 

Route Day 

Service 

Hours 

Peak Headway 

(mins) 

Midday 

Headway (mins) 

Downtown

Weekday 35.75 10-15 60

Weekend 18 30 All Day

Presidio Hills

Weekday 17.5 15 30

Weekend 7.5 30 All Day

Crissy Field

Weekday 11.5 30 All Day

Weekend 7.5 30 All Day

Source: Presidio Trust, 2019

2019 PRESIDIGO ROUTE PERFORMANCE

PresidiGo has historically been one of the Bay Area’s most productive 

transit systems. This section summarizes route performance prior to 

COVID-19. Additional data is provided in Appendix A. 

Ridership Trends 

The PresidiGo revolves around the Downtown route, which serves as 

the primary downtown connection for Presidio residents and brings

Presidio employees to their workplaces. As seen in Figure 1, boardings 

are concentrated in residential areas in the AM and areas with high 

density of employees in the PM, indicating commute-oriented trips. In 

addition to passengers boarding or alighting in the Main Post and the 

Letterman District, a significant number of Downtown passengers 

transfer to and from the Presidio Hills route, which serves the highervolume markets in the southwestern corner of the park such as Baker 

Beach, the Public Health District, and Building 1750. The Crissy Field 

route, however, saw relatively low ridership, with few boardings near 

Fort Winfield Scott and the Crissy corridor; its primary function was

shuttling passengers between the Main Post and Golden Gate Bridge 

toll plaza. 

As shown in Figure 2, weekend ridership represents a more diverse 

array of trip purposes and is substantially lower than weekdays. The 

Downtown and Presidio Hills routes experience about 75 percent less 

ridership on weekends, serving some commute trips, visitors, and 

essential connections for residents. In contrast, the Crissy Field route 

serves a roughly comparable ridership market on weekends, shuttling 

visitors to and from the Golden Gate Bridge. 

The COVID-19 pandemic and associated service cuts have had a 

tremendous impact on PresidiGo ridership. Between February and 

April 2020, the system lost over 90% of its ridership, dropping to 

around 3,000 passengers per month. Ridership began to rebound in 

Fall 2020, to around 8,000 riders in October. However, ridership fell 

again the next month and has remained roughly between 4,000 and 

5,500 riders per month through Winter and Spring 2021.

Productivity & Cost Effectiveness 

The productivity of a transit route is typically gauged by how many 

passengers use the service during its hours of operation, otherwise 

known as passengers per service hour (see Table 3). Prior to COVID19, the Downtown route experienced high productivity comparable to 

some Muni routes, serving over 45 passengers per hour on weekdays.

The Presidio Hills route also showed strong productivity, serving over 

27 passengers per hour on weekdays. The Crissy Field route saw lower 

productivity around 14 passengers per hour, which is more similar to 

a suburban coverage service. While productivity is generally lower on 

weekends, it remains reasonably strong for a more coverage-oriented 

service. As a relatively low-cost operation, all three routes were very 

cost-effective with costs per passenger of $1.69 to $5.31 (a fraction of 

regional averages). Historic average operating costs per passenger are 

shown in Figure 3.

On the whole, PresidiGo is a highly productive transit system 

compared with other transit systems in the Bay Area, as shown in 

Table 4.
6 LONG RANGE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

Figure 1: Weekday Ridership in 2019 

 
Existing Conditions 7

Figure 2: Weekend Ridership in 2019 
8 LONG RANGE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

Table 3: October 2019 Performance Comparison 

Route Day Ridership 

Productivity 

(passengers/hr) 

Cost per 

Passenger 

Downtown

Weekday 1,632 45.7 $1.69

Weekend 382 21.2 $3.61

Presidio 

Hills

Weekday 476 27.2 $2.82

Weekend 128 17.1 $4.49

Crissy 

Field

Weekday 166 14.4 $5.31

Weekend 131 17.5 $4.38

Source: Presidio Trust, 2019 

Table 4: Performance of Bay Area Transit Systems 

System 

Productivity 

(passengers/service hr) 

Cost per Passenger 

PresidiGo 29.7 $2.32

Muni (bus only) 64.6 $3.19

Golden Gate Transit 12.8 $24.76

SamTrans 16.4 $12.39

AC Transit 25.8 $7.85

VTA (bus only) 20.0 $9.72

Source: National Transit Database, 2019 https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/transitagency-profiles

1 2019 Presidio Employee and Resident Transportation Survey

Figure 3: Historic Operating Cost per Passenger 

RIDER FEEDBACK

Prior to the pandemic, PresidiGo was the most commonly used mode 

for residents to commute to work. Since the introduction of PresidiGo, 

drive-alone commute rates have dropped from 60 percent of Presidio 

commuters driving alone to work to 40 percent.

1 Since 2000, the 

percentage of workers and residents taking public transportation or 

PresidiGo has grown to 37 percent from just 10 percent.

1 Each year,

the Presidio Trust surveys PresidiGo riders to fulfill grant 

requirements and solicit user feedback. In 2020, riders gave the 

shuttle an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. Riders gave the cost of the 

shuttle (free) the highest rating at 9.6 out of 10, followed by commute

time savings (8.4 out of 10). Furthermore, 73 percent of free-response 

comments were positive and expressed appreciation for the service.

The most common rider critique has been the quality and age of the 

bus fleet. Many riders note that the shuttle fleet is loud and the aging 

buses are bumpy or uncomfortable. They reference the newest bus 

purchased as being a significant improvement in terms of ride quality. 

Another common request is to improve the real time tracking so that 

the arrival times are updated more frequently. Some riders suggest 

that PresidiGo stop more often or offer more services, such as to the 

Richmond District or Laurel Village. Lastly, riders would prefer more 

stop amenities like lighting and seating.

 $-

 $1.00

 $2.00

 $3.00

 $4.00

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Average Cost Target Max Cost
Existing Conditions 9

OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT

PresidiGo is a well-liked service that is among the most productive and 

cost-effective transit operations in the Bay Area. While most core 

transit needs are met, there exist a few opportunities for near- and 

long-term improvement.

For proposed schedules, service hours, and cost estimates associated 

with these opportunities, see Section 3 and Appendix B.

Crissy Field Service Redundancy 

In 2019, the Crissy Field route was the least productive in the 

PresidiGo system, serving primarily as a shuttle to the Golden Gate 

Bridge Toll Plaza. PresidiGo was not the only route to serve the Toll 

Plaza, as both Muni and Golden Gate Transit stop there, making the 

Crissy Field route redundant. The resources used to operate it might 

be used elsewhere with a greater benefit to residents and employees.

Weekday Midday Downtown Service 

Service frequency on the Downtown Route is heavily skewed to 

traditional commute periods (7:00 AM - 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM - 6:00 

PM) while providing hourly service for most of the midday period. 

Hourly midday service on the Downtown route limits its usefulness for

residents and commuters with nontraditional work schedules, as well 

as non-work trips (such as tourists visiting the Presidio). With many 

companies offering more flexible work schedules coming out of the 

COVID-19 pandemic, an expanded midday schedule presents an 

opportunity to serve a wider range of travel behavior. 

Improved Connections and Reliability Downtown 

Alignment changes around downtown may help improve connections 

and reduce congestion encountered by the Downtown Route. With the 

opening of the Salesforce Transit Center, PresidiGo’s stop at the 

former Temporary Transbay Terminal at Beale & Howard is no longer 

as convenient for transfers to transbay buses. Moreover, buses often 

encounter traffic congestion in SoMa. A stop closer to or within the 

Salesforce Transit Center would be more efficient for passengers 

transferring and may help improve travel times and reliability 

through SoMa. 

Additionally, the Downtown Route passes by Chinatown and North 

Beach without stopping to serve these districts as well as key northsouth transit corridors like the future Central Subway station. A new 

stop along Broadway would expand opportunities for residents, 

commuters, and tourists to ride PresidiGo.

Inner Richmond Connection 

While PresidiGo provides a highly effective connection for Presidio 

residents and employees to Downtown San Francisco and 

neighborhoods to the east, it lacks effective connections to the 

Richmond District and other destinations to the south. Muni’s 29 

Sunset and 43 Masonic routes have historically provided service to the 

edges of the Richmond District and other western neighborhoods, but 

no route connects the Main Post to the 28R 19th Avenue Rapid (the 

primary north-south route in western San Francisco) and destinations 

in the Inner Richmond neighborhood. Moreover, uncertainty 

surrounding the return of the 43 to the Presidio may further weaken 

this connection. A route connecting the Main Post to the Inner 

Richmond via Arguello could open up access to shops and services for 

Presidio residents, as well as offer connections to the 28R and several 

other Muni routes, such as the 1, 2, 33, 38/38R, and 44.

One-Seat Ride 

The PresidiGo is somewhat unique in that a majority of its residents 

using intra-park services are required to transfer to enter and exit the 

Presidio. In particular, most Presidio Hills riders transfer to the 

Downtown route, suggesting that route changes to provide a one-seat 

ride between Baker Beach and Downtown could reduce travel times 

and create a more comfortable trip. However, existing constraints

such as the size and type of buses, steep hills, and tight turns preclude 

a single route from operating. Changes in future fleet composition and 

significant modifications to portions of the Presidio Hills route, 

especially the Battery Caulfield Connector Road, might make a oneseat ride feasible in the future.
10 LONG RANGE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

This page intentionally left blank.
Recommendations 11

03 Recommendations

“Presidio Transit Center” by Pi.1415926535is licensed underCC-BY-SA-3.0
12 LONG RANGE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

03 RECOMMENDATIONS

This section proposes several service recommendations for the 

PresidiGo as the COVID-19 pandemic subsides. While uncertainty 

remains around the near-term and long-term effects on travel 

behavior, these recommendations to enhance connections, diversify 

trip opportunities, and address gaps in service frequency would help 

position the PresidiGo to rebuild ridership and remain resilient. The 

recommendations discussed in this section are intended to be costneutral or relatively low-cost. 

SERVICE RECOMMENDATIONS

Downtown Route 

In order to increase ridership and improve access on the Downtown 

route, three changes are recommended outside of the Presidio:

1. Expand midday service on the Downtown route to half 

hourly frequency between 10 AM and 3 PM in order to better 

serve nontraditional work schedules and a greater diversity 

of trip purposes.

2. Reroute service in SoMa to improve reliability and better 

serve Salesforce Transit Center. A relocated PresidiGo stop 

could share the existing Muni stop on Mission Street 

between Fremont and Beale or access the underused Golden 

Gate Transit Bay in the Transit Center. These options are 

shown in more detail in Figure 4.

3. Provide a new stop at Broadway and Stockton Street to 

enable connections to Chinatown and North Beach as well as

the Chinatown Central Subway station. This stop would 

require minimal modification of the curb, using an existing 

Muni stop in the eastbound direction and a large bulbout in 

the westbound direction.

If necessary to help offset the increased costs associated with these 

recommendations, the Trust may consider eliminating the first and 

last trips of the day and/or the fifth peak hour trip (if expanded peak 

hour capacity is no longer needed post-COVID).

Presidio Hills Route 

Despite its geographic constraints, the Presidio Hills route is an 

efficient and productive service; consequently, only minor schedule 

and stop changes are recommended:

1. Expand weekday morning service with a 6:15 AM and 8:15 

AM trip to provide more connections to existing Downtown 

trips, ensuring that each Downtown trip would have a 

corresponding Presidio Hills trip. 

2. Standardize service to Inspiration Point, either by removing 

service to the stop to enable faster trips, or by serving the 

stop in both directions if an Arguello Route (discussed 

below) is not pursued.

Crissy Field Route 

Due to its lower productivity, emphasis on Toll Plaza-related trips, and 

overlap with Muni and Golden Gate Transit services, restoring the 

Crissy Field route is not recommended:

1. Reinvest cost savings associated with the elimination of the 

Crissy Field route into services with higher ridership 

potential, including the Downtown Route, Presidio Hills 

Route, and new Arguello Route.

New Arguello Route 

To address the gap in transit service between the Presidio and the 

Richmond District, a new Arguello route is recommended:

1. Implement a new Arguello route connecting the Letterman 

District and Main Post with the Inner Richmond 

neighborhood.

As shown in Figure 5, the route would make use of existing Muni stops 

at Arguello & California, Geary & Arguello, 6th Avenue & Clement, and

California & 6th Avenue. This alignment would connect to Muni routes 

1, 2, 28R, 33, 38/38R, and 44, allowing connections not only to the 

Richmond itself but to points around San Francisco. Most notably, the 

new connection to the 28R will open access to the Presidio from 

neighborhoods throughout western San Francisco. Within the 

Presidio, the route would use the existing Inspiration Point stop as a 

northbound stop, with a new southbound stop provided at the Presidio 

Golf Course. 
Recommendations 13

Figure 4: Downtown Route Alignment Options 

 
14 LONG RANGE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

Figure 5: Arguello Route Proposal 
Recommendations 15

This proposed route could be served by a single bus at 30-minute 

frequencies with a layover at Letterman. The route may begin as a 

weekday peak period pilot route or could be rolled out as an all-day 

service and/or weekend service. Since it typically takes a year or two 

for riders to adjust their travel behavior (and sometimes change home 

or work locations), a multi-year commitment to the new route 

is suggested.

A potential variant on the Arguello route would extend south of Geary 

for connections to the 31 and 5/5R buses, Golden Gate Park, and more 

shops and services, such as the Safeway off 7th Avenue. However, this 

route could require another bus or eliminating the loop around 

Letterman to maintain 30-minute headways. The Trust may consider 

testing travel times and monitoring ridership demand to assess 

whether service to Letterman or service south of Geary would be 

more productive.

COST ESTIMATES

The recommendations described above strive to remain cost-neutral 

or relatively low-cost. Table 5 summarizes the estimated costs 

measured against a pre-COVID baseline, based on an assumed cost 

per service hour of $78.89.

Compared to a pre-COVID baseline expenditure of approximately 

$1.64 million annually (Row 1), implementing the recommended 

changes to the Downtown and Presidio Hills routes while eliminating 

the Crissy Field route would cost approximately $1.44 million per year 

(Row 2). Adding a new Arguello Route would increase costs to 

approximately $1.55 to $1.75 million per year depending on whether 

the service is peak period-only, all-day on weekdays, or weekdays and 

weekends (Rows 2-4). 

For proposed schedules, please see Appendix B.

Table 5: Service Proposal Cost Estimates 

Scenario 

Service Hours Annual 

Cost 

Change from 

Weekday Baseline  Weekend 

0 Pre-COVID Baseline 65 33 $1.64M -

1

Downtown and 

Presidio Hills Only1

58 26.5 $1.44M -$0.2M (-12%)

2

Add Arguello 

(Weekday Peak)2

64 26.5 $1.56M -$0.08M (-5%)

3

Add Arguello (AllDay Weekday) 70 26.5 $1.69M+$0.04M 

(+3%)

4

Add Arguello 

(Weekday and

Weekend)

70 34 $1.75M

+$0.11M 

(+7%)

1 This cost estimate factors in proposed service changes on the Downtown and Presidio 

Hills routes, including additional and eliminated trips. Without these improvements, 

the cost for these two routes would be $1.34 million.

2 All service proposals with the Arguello route also include the proposed Downtown and 

Presidio Hills service improvements

Source: Fehr & Peers

STOP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

PresidiGo stops include a range of facilities, from large waiting 

shelters to barely visible roadside stops with signage only. The Trust 

may consider embarking on a stop improvement program to better 

standardize amenities and access at stops within the Presidio. This 

program would prioritize stops based on the number of boardings and 

the potential to integrate improvements into other planned work. 

Ideally, the Trust would aim for each stop to have:

• A fully accessible approach and waiting area

• Clear and visible pedestrian-oriented wayfinding signage

• A bus shelter with seating

• Access to existing pedestrian network (sidewalks, crosswalks, 

trails, etc.)

Additionally, there are some opportunities for improving stop spacing 

and service legibility within the Presidio itself. As shown in Figure 6, 

the existing stop locations in the Letterman District are asymmetrical 

between eastbound and westbound service, which makes the system 
16 LONG RANGE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

more complicated to use. As other street projects are implemented in 

the area, such as new or improved pedestrian routes and changes to 

access on Letterman, the Trust may take the opportunity to reconsider 

the locations of these PresidiGo stops and explore ways to bring 

eastbound and westbound stops into alignment with each other. 

Improved stop symmetry and spacing would benefit the Downtown 

Route as well as the proposed Arguello Route that would share some 

of these stops.

Figure 6. Existing stops on Letterman Drive 

FUTURE SERVICE CONSIDERATIONS

As noted above, many PresidiGo riders transfer between the Presidio 

Hills and Downtown routes, suggesting it could be most efficient to 

operate as single route providing a one-seat ride between Baker Beach 

and Downtown. Such a route is currently infeasible: the buses used on 

the Downtown route are too large for many of the tight turns and 

steeps grades traversed by the Presidio Hills route (most notably at the 

Washington/Arguello intersection and within the Baker Beach 

apartments). However, a single route could be achieved with future 

fleet upgrades and capital improvements, namely a redesigned 

intersection at Washington and Arguello and a rebuilt Battery 

Caulfield Cutoff Road. The former improvement is a potential nearterm project with potential benefits for pedestrians and bicyclists as 

well as PresidiGo users. The latter, which would likely require 

redevelopment of existing buildings in Baker Beach, is not under 

consideration at this time. However, the Trust should consider the 

possibility of a one-seat ride when making future fleet and 

development decisions. An example of a proposed one-seat route is 

shown on Figure 7. 
Recommendations 17

Figure 7: One-Seat Ride Proposal 
Appendix A: Pre-COVID Ridership by Run
 -

 10.0

 20.0

 30.0

 40.0

 50.0

5:45 AM6:45 AM7:15 AM7:40 AM8:00 AM8:30 AM9:00 AM

10:00 AM

12:00 PM

2:00 PM3:30 PM4:15 PM4:45 PM5:10 PM5:30 PM6:00 PM6:30 PM7:30 PM

Downtown (From Presidio)

Weekday

2019 RIDERSHIP SEATED CAPACITY 85% THRESHOLD

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Downtown (From Presidio)

Weekend

RIDERSHIP CAPACITY

0

10

20

30

40

Downtown (To Presidio)

Weekday

2019 RIDERSHIP SEATED CAPACITY 85% THRESHOLD

0

10

20

30

40

Downtown (To Presidio)

Weekend

RIDERSHIP CAPACITY
0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Presidio Hills

Weekday

2019 RIDERSHIP SEATED CAPACITY 85% THRESHOLD

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Presidio Hills 

Weekend

RIDERSHIP CAPACITY
Appendix B: Proposed PresidiGo Schedules

 
Downtown Route – Weekday Schedule 

Times Departing the Presidio Transit Center

5:45 8:45 14:00 17:30

6:30 9:00 14:30 17:45

6:45 9:30 15:00 18:00

7:00 10:00 15:30 18:15

7:15 10:30 16:00 18:30

7:30 11:00 16:15 19:00

7:40 11:30 16:30 19:30

7:50 12:00 16:45

8:00 12:30 17:00

8:15 13:00 17:10

8:30 13:30 17:20

Presidio Hills Route – Weekday Schedule 

Times Departing the Presidio Transit Center

6:15 8:30 13:00 17:15

6:30 9:00 13:30 17:30

6:45 9:30 14:00 17:45

7:00 10:00 14:30 18:00

7:15 10:30 15:00 18:15

7:30 11:00 15:30 18:30

7:45 11:30 16:00 18:45

8:00 12:00 16:30 19:00

8:15 12:30 17:00 19:30

Downtown Route – Weekend Schedule 

Times Departing the Presidio Transit Center

9:00 14:30

10:00 15:00

10:30 15:30

11:00 16:00

11:30 16:30

12:00 17:00

12:30 17:30

13:00 18:00

13:30 18:30

14:00

Presidio Hills Route – Weekend Schedule 

Times Departing the Presidio Transit Center

11:00 15:00

11:30 15:30

12:00 16:00

12:30 16:30

13:00 17:00

13:30 17:30

14:00 18:00

14:30
Arguello Route (Peak Only) – Weekday Schedule 

Times Departing the Letterman District

7:08 8:38 16:08 17:38

7:38 9:08 16:38 18:08

8:08 9:38 17:08 18:38

Arguello Route (Full Day) – Weekday Schedule 

Times Departing the Letterman District

7:08 10:08 13:08 16:08

7:38 10:38 13:38 16:38

8:08 11:08 14:08 17:08

8:38 11:38 14:38 17:38

9:08 12:08 15:08 18:08

9:38 12:38 15:38 18:38

Arguello Route (Peak Only) – Weekend Schedule 

No weekend service

Arguello Route (Full Day) – Weekend Schedule 

Times Departing the Letterman District

11:00 15:00

11:30 15:30

12:00 16:00

12:30 16:30

13:00 17:00

13:30 17:30

14:00 18:00

14:30
Appendix I: Slow Streets Selection
345 California Street | Suite 450 | San Francisco, CA 94104 | (415) 348-0300 | Fax (415) 773-1790 

www.fehrandpeers.com

Memorandum

Date: July 2021

To: Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

From: Ashley Hong, Ingrid Ballus Armet, Ryan McClain, and Drew Levitt, Fehr & Peers

Subject: Presidio Slow Streets Selection

SF20-1126

Introduction

The term Slow Streets emerged over the course of the Covid-19 pandemic in reference to 

roadway closures intended to expand space for socially distanced outdoor activity. Street closures 

are not a new concept, but the widespread rollout and semi-permanence of these closures is a 

new phenomenon. Both the City of San Francisco and the Presidio Trust introduced slow street 

programs in 2020, which remain in place as of the writing of this memo (see a snapshot of the 

Presidio’s program in the image below). Even as vaccines eliminate the need for socially distanced 

space, the other benefits of closed or slower streets deserve attention and consideration. Slow 

streets provide:

• Low stress bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are comfortable for all ages and abilities

• Bicycle and pedestrian connectivity filling key gaps in the network

• Cut-through vehicle deterrence 

where alternate routes exist

• A sense-of-place or community 

where art, food trucks, or other 

temporary installations or 

gatherings can take place

• All of the above without a 

costly or disruptive 

construction project

The goal of the Presidio Slow Streets 

Selection process is to zoom out from 
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 2 of 29

the Trust’s current Slow Streets program and more holistically evaluate and identify appropriate 

slow street locations and treatments. The result is a list of vetted slow street candidates to aid the 

Presidio Trust with future slow street decisions. This memo outlines the selection process, types of 

slow streets (i.e. full closure, local access, traffic calming), treatment recommendations, and 

analysis of the effects of slow street conversion. 

Selection Process

The selection process applied multiple spatial filters on the Presidio’s roadway network to identify 

and rank suitable slow streets. All recommended slow street candidates have been screened for 

the criteria listed below. The GIS data analysis included:

• Arterials network – filtered out

• Residential district – filtered out street segments entirely inside residential neighborhoods

• Slope – filtered out street segments with >8% grade

◦ Slope was calculated based on segment lengths between two intersections; some 

road segments that are longer in length, like West Pacific, may have points of higher 

slope than is reflected in the calculation

• Trailhead connections – identified and kept street segments that connect to key trailheads

• Bicycle & pedestrian network – identified and kept previously identified connectivity gaps 

in the bicycle and/or pedestrian network

Arterial streets were filtered out to ensure that major vehicle thoroughfares would not be 

included in the analysis. Street segments entirely inside residential neighborhoods were filtered 

out as these street segments are already relatively slow and the gains to pedestrian and bicycle 

safety and comfort would be minor. The primary bicycle and pedestrian network developed as 

part of the LoTIS project was included to determine gaps in low-stress pedestrian and bicycle 

infrastructure. Streets with slopes greater than 8% were removed due to the difficulty in installing 

slow street treatments such as speed lumps, and the assumption that fewer pedestrians and 

cyclists, particularly families with children, may choose these routes. The 8% threshold is 

consistent with SFMTA guidance on determining slow streets in the rest of San Francisco.

In addition to the GIS data, a qualitative analysis of the following was considered in determining 

the type of slow street that would best suit each candidate: 

• Traffic volumes

• Land use needs (e.g. school loading access; ADA access)

• Parking lot access
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 3 of 29

Slow Street Types

Each slow street candidate will require different treatments determined by the land uses on the 

street, vehicle access needs, and connections with other street segments or trails. Three main slow 

street types are identified: Full Closure, Local Access, and Traffic Calming. For each slow street 

type treatment options with quick-build materials are presented and a typical installation example 

illustrates the recommended treatment. These treatments could also be implemented with 

permanent infrastructure. The recommendations in this memo are intended to be full-time (24/7) 

installations that residents, employees, and visitors recognize as status quo. If slow street 

treatment is desired for a short-term event (such as Presidio Picnic), the Full Closure and Local 

Access treatment types are good options to consider. Shorter events should use materials that are 

easily movable and ample signage explaining the temporary change.

Full Closure Slow Street

The full closure of a street or street segment is the complete restriction of private vehicles. 

Exceptions can be made for street segments on a case-by-case basis for ADA accessibility, transit, 

and freight, but generally, only emergency and maintenance vehicles will be allowed. Full closures 

are recommended on street segments where the right of way is limited to create dedicated space 

for multiple modes and where there are no land uses or parking lots that need direct access.

Table 1 lists example treatments for full closures. All full closure treatments, except for signage, 

are very effective in reducing cut-through traffic and will divert those vehicles to alternate routes. 

Planters and signage are preferred treatments because they are easy to install, are flexible, and 

are aesthetically consistent with the natural landscape of the Presidio. 

Figure 1 shows a typical installation of planters and signs for a full closure slow street. 
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 4 of 29

Table 1: Full Street Closure Treatment Options

Treatment Description Advantages Disadvantages Example

Planters

What is it? Barriers placed across a 

street to close the street completely to 

through traffic, usually leaving only 

sidewalks or bicycle paths open. 

Planters have a vegetation element 

incorporated into the barrier.

How and where can it be applied?

Planters should be placed across the 

width of a street at intersections every 

500 feet accompanied by signage. 

Planters are ideal for quick-build 

solutions

• Able to maintain 

pedestrian and

bicycle connectivity

• Can be designed to 

maintain access

for emergency 

vehicles

• Requires maintenance

• Weight/size must be 

balanced with potential 

for theft or for someone 

to move them out of the 

way

• Plants and soil require 

testing prior to placement 

in the Presidio.

White Water 

Wall Barriers or 

Concrete Jersey 

Barriers or 

What is it? A water-filled or concrete

barrier that can be used to create a wallstyle barrier

How and where can it be applied?

These barriers can be placed across the 

width of a street at intersections and at 

the start of a closed street segment. 

These barriers should be used for 

longer-term treatments

• Durable and longlasting

• Can be decorated 

with public art

• Water barriers are 

relatively easy to 

move

• Concrete barriers are 

extremely heavy, 

requiring special 

equipment to move into 

place

• Can be unattractive if 

not decorated

• May pose challenges for 

emergency vehicle access
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 5 of 29

Treatment Description Advantages Disadvantages Example

Granite 

Blocks/Large 

Boulders

What is it? Large, granite blocks or 

boulders that can be used as a barrier 

element and can double as seating 

depending on type/placement

How and where can it be applied?

Granite Blocks or any large boulders can 

be placed across the width of a street at 

intersections and at the start of a closed 

street segment. These should be used for 

longer-term/permanent treatments.

• Durable and longlasting

• Extremely heavy, 

requiring special 

equipment

• May pose challenges for 

emergency vehicle access

• Consider visibility when 

selecting type and size, 

may require additional 

enhancements to be visible 

at night. Source: https://www.pps.org/article/livememtraffic

Forced Turn 

Island

What is it? Raised islands that prohibit 

certain movements on approaches to an 

intersection

How and where can it be applied?

Typically installed as permanent 

infrastructure at intersections

• Can improve safety 

at an intersection by 

prohibiting critical 

turning movements 

• Reduces traffic 

volumes

• If designed improperly, 

drivers can maneuver 

around the island to make 

an illegal movement 

• Care must be taken to 

still allow desired bicycle 

and pedestrian 

movements.

Signage

What is it? Signs to indicate a turn or 

through movement restriction such as 

“Road Closed to Through Traffic” and “No 

Right/Left Turn”

How and where can it be applied?

At intersections and intermittently 

throughout the closed segment

• Low Cost

• Requires enforcement

• Signs can be susceptible 

to theft or movement

Source: https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/threeslow-streets-could-become-permanent/

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 6 of 29

Figure 1: Example Full Closure
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 7 of 29

Local Access Slow Street

A slow street that maintains local access restricts private vehicles from using the street to travel 

through to access other streets (cut-through traffic) but remains accessible to resident drivers

who live on the street or visitors who require access to a particular use such as ADA accessible 

loading zones. Local access restrictions are recommended for street segments where the right of 

way is limited to create dedicated space for multiple modes, but some users still require vehicle 

access. Access remains open for public buses, emergency vehicles, delivery vehicles, maintenance 

vehicles, and TNCs/taxis when their passenger is within the closure. Table 2 lists example 

treatments for local access slow streets. All local access treatments, except for signage, are 

effective in reducing cut-through traffic and will divert those vehicles to alternate routes. Local 

access treatments can be paired with traffic calming treatments (see Table 3). Planters and 

signage are preferred treatments because they are easy to install, are flexible, and are 

aesthetically consistent with the natural landscape of the Presidio. Unlike planters placed across 

the entire street in a full closure scenario, planters used for local access slow streets would be 

placed on half of the street to allow for local vehicle access. Additional traffic calming treatments 

such as chicanes may also be implemented. Figure 2 shows a typical installation of planters and 

signs for a local access slow street.
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 8 of 29

Table 2: Local Access Slow Street Treatment Options

Treatment Description Advantages Disadvantages Example

Planters

What is it? Barriers placed across 

half of a street closing it to through 

traffic, leaving one lane open for 

local access. Planters have a 

vegetation element incorporated 

into the barrier.

How and where can it be applied?

Planters should be placed across half 

of a street at intersections every 500 

feet accompanied by signage. 

Planters are ideal for quick-build 

solutions

• Able to maintain 

pedestrian and

bicycle connectivity

• Can be designed to 

maintain access

for emergency vehicles

• Requires maintenance

Source: https://sfbike.org/news/meet-jessica-andanthony-champions-of-slow-streets/

Signage

What is it? Signs to indicate a turn 

or through movement restrictions

such as “Road Closed - Local Traffic 

Only”

How and where can it be applied?

At intersections and intermittently 

throughout the closed segment 

• Low Cost • Requires enforcement

Source: https://www.boulevardsentinel.com/up-fordebate/
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 9 of 29

Treatment Description Advantages Disadvantages Example

Diagonal Diverter

What is it? A diverted island built 

diagonally across a street 

intersection which prevents certain 

through and/or turning movements

How and where can it be applied?

At intersections at the end of a 

closed street segment

• Able to maintain 

pedestrian and

bicycle connectivity

• Opportunity for 

planting

• Reduces cut-through 

traffic

• May impact 

stormwater flow and 

drainage patterns

• May impact volumes 

on parallel streets and 

network connectivity

• Emergency vehicle 

access should be 

reviewed with local 

agency

• Any compliance 

issues should be 

addressed during 

design

Source: http://www.pedbikesafe.org/pedsafe/

countermeasures_detail.cfm?CM_NUM=41

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 10 of 29

Figure 2: Example Local Access
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 11 of 29

Traffic Calming Slow Street

A slow street that implements traffic calming measures remains open to all vehicles but uses 

design treatments such as speed lumps and chokers to maintain slow travel speeds or encourage 

pass-through vehicles to take alternative routes. A traffic calming slow street may be 

implemented instead of a full or partial closure if private vehicle access is necessary for some 

buildings/land uses, or if there are no other suitable routes for the diverted traffic. Traffic calming 

measures are recommended on street segments where slower vehicle speeds would greatly 

improve the safety and connectivity through the Presidio but where a full closure or local access 

restriction may not be possible. Table 3 lists example treatments for traffic calming. Striping and 

speed lumps/cushions are preferred because they are easy to install and effective in reducing 

speeds. Striping and speed lumps/cushions maintain emergency vehicle access and are easily 

traversable by bikes. Figure 3 shows a typical installation of speed lumps/cushions for a traffic 

calming slow street. 
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 12 of 29

Table 3: Traffic Calming Slow Street Treatment Options

Treatment Description Advantages Disadvantages Example

Striping

What is it? Paint or thermoplastic used 

to narrow the travel lanes for vehicles,

thereby inducing drivers to lower their

speeds

How and where can it be applied?

Striping can be used on roads with 

lanes wider than 11 feet

• Inexpensive

• Can be used to create 

bicycle lanes or

delineate on-street 

parking

• Does not slow 

emergency vehicles

• Has not been shown to 

significantly reduce travel 

speeds 

• Requires regular 

maintenance

Speed 

Lumps/Cushions

What is it? Rounded raised areas

placed across the road with two wheel 

cutouts designed to allow large 

vehicles, such as emergency vehicles 

and buses, to pass

with minimal slowing. The design limits

passenger cars and mid-size SUVs 

from fully passing through the cutouts and requires travel over the lump.

How and where can it be applied?

Speed lumps/cushions should be 

placed approximately every 500 feet 

and are suitable for streets with a low 

grade

• Effective in reducing 

speeds 

• Maintains rapid 

emergency response 

times 

• Relatively easy for 

bicyclists to cross

• Non-emergency 

vehicles with wide 

wheelbases can

pass through the lump 

using the wheel

cut-outs

• Increased noise from 

vehicles accelerating
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 13 of 29

Treatment Description Advantages Disadvantages Example

Chokers

What is it? Curb extensions at 

midblock that narrow a street

How and where can it be applied?

Chokers can be applied midblock on 

wide streets

• Easily negotiable by 

emergency vehicles and 

buses 

• Can have positive 

aesthetic value 

• Reduces speeds

• Opportunity for 

planting

• Effect on vehicle speeds 

is limited by the absence 

of vertical or horizontal 

deflection 

• May require bicyclists to 

briefly merge with 

vehicular traffic 

• Loss of on-street 

parking 

• Build-up of debris in the 

gutter

Chicanes

What is it? A series of alternating 

midblock curb extensions or islands that 

narrow the roadway and require vehicles 

to follow a curving, S-shaped path, 

discouraging speeding

How and where can it be applied?

Chicanes are best used on narrow 

streets to prevent cars from swinging 

out to maintain their speed

• Narrows the roadway 

which may cause 

motorists to reduce their 

operating speeds and may 

reduce the volume

• Reduces impervious 

cover and has a positive 

environmental impact

• Negotiable by 

emergency vehicles and 

buses

• Curb realignment and 

landscaping may be costly

• Some on-street parking 

may be eliminated

• Bicyclists may briefly have 

to merge with vehicular 

traffic

• Local street drainage may 

be impacted Source: 

https://www.transportphoto.net/dt?dtid=1204
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 14 of 29

Treatment Description Advantages Disadvantages Example

Speed feedback 

sign (or trailer)

What is it? Signs that display drivers’ 

real-time speeds

How and where can it be applied?

Signs can be used on any street but 

may be most effective where drivers 

typically surpass speed limits or there 

are no physical treatments to 

encourage reduced speeds

• Relatively low cost 

• Quick implementation 

• Provides immediate 

feedback 

• Does not require an 

officer to be present 

• Can be permanent 

(sign) or moved to 

different locations 

(trailer) 

• Data can be recorded

• Does not physically 

slow emergency

vehicles or buses

• Effectiveness may be 

temporary

• Only effective for one 

direction of travel

• Subject to vandalism

Physical barrier separators

Concrete Buttons

What is it? Low, mountable buttons 

that can be used to achieve a curb-like 

barrier

How and where can it be applied?

Concrete buttons can be applied at 

intersections or at midblock bulbouts 

in instances where larger vehicles such 

as emergency vehicles or delivery 

trucks may need to mount a curb

• Durable and 

mountable for 

emergency vehicles

• Low visible profile may 

lead to decreased safety 

perception for people 

walking/biking compared 

to other taller vertical 

treatments
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 15 of 29

Treatment Description Advantages Disadvantages Example

Parking Stops

What is it? Low, mountable plastic, 

rubber, or concrete curb that can be 

bolted to the pavement and used as a 

barrier element

How and where can it be applied?

Parking stops can be applied as bike 

lane separators 

• Easy to install and 

remove

• Durable and mountable 

for emergency vehicles

• Low profile may present a 

trip or bicycle hazard

Source: 

http://tacticalurbanismguide.com/materials/parki

ng-stops/

Armadillos

What is it? Low, mountable plastic 

bump that can be used to achieve a 

curb-like barrier

How and where can it be applied?

Armadillos are typically used as bike lane 

separators

• Easy to install and 

remove

• Durable and meant to 

last several years

• Mountable for 

emergency vehicles

• Minimal/no stormwater 

obstruction

• Can be set at angles to 

allow cyclists to cross 

barriers

• Low visible profile may 

lead to decreased safety 

perception for people 

walking/biking compared 

to other taller vertical 

treatments

Source: https://www.cyclehoop.com/news/april2014/salford-city-council-address-cycle-lanesafety-by-introducing-the-armadillo/

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021. 
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 16 of 29

Figure 3: Example Traffic Calming
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 17 of 29

Candidate List

The following table lists all suitable slow street segments, applicable selection criteria, slow street 

type recommendation, and whether it is a top candidate segment at this moment in time.

Table 4: Slow Street Candidate Segments

Street Segment Extents Selection 

Criteria

Slow Street 

Type

Top 

Candidate Notes

Storey Ave

Lincoln Blvd to 

Ralston Ave; 

Battery Wagner 

Rd to Rod Rd

Gap Closure, 

Other

Local Access or 

Traffic Calming

Battery Wagner Rd All Other Full Closure

Stone St All Other

Pavement 

Removal 

Opportunity

Retain parking 

access but there 

may be 

opportunity to 

narrow curb cuts / 

remove pavement.

Ralston Ave All Other Local Access

Low-stress 

alternative to 

Lincoln Blvd.

Upton Ave All Local Access or 

Traffic Calming

Choose Ralston OR 

Upton but not 

both

Kinzey St All Other Full Closure

Greenough Ave All Gap Closure Full Closure

Choose 

Greenough OR 

Upton but not 

both 

Kobbe Ave

Washington 

Blvd to Park 

Blvd

Gap Closure,

Other

Local Access or 

Traffic Calming

Hitchcock St All Other Local Access

Choose Kobbe OR 

Hitchcock but not 

both

Harrison Blvd

Washington Blvd All

Gap Closure, 

Trail 

Connection, 

Other

Full Closure, 

Local Access, 

Traffic Calming 

(see below for 

specifics)

Yes Currently a Slow 

Street

Central Magazine Rd All Trail 

Connection

Local Access or 

Traffic Calming
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 18 of 29

Street Segment Extents Selection 

Criteria

Slow Street 

Type

Top 

Candidate Notes

Compton Rd All Gap Closure Local Access or 

Traffic Calming

Bowley St All Other Traffic Calming

Only access to 

Baker Beach 

parking

Battery Caulfield /

Wedemeyer St

Hayes St to 

Washington 

Blvd

Trail 

Connection

Local Access 

and Traffic 

Calming

Yes

Hybrid approach 

that allows 

through traffic in 

the downhill 

direction and local 

access only in the 

uphill direction

Hays St None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Belles St None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Wyman Ave None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Brown St None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Park Blvd All

Trail 

Connection, 

Other

Local Access 

south of 

Kobbe, Traffic 

Calming north 

of Kobbe

Yes, Kobbe 

Ave to 

Washington 

Blvd

Compton Rd All Gap Closure Local Access

If Washington is 

Local Access Only, 

Compton becomes 

a de facto local 

access street

McDowell Ave / 

Crissy Field Ave

Patten Rd to 

Mason St Other Traffic Calming

Cowles St None

Trail 

Connection, 

Other

No slow street

Important 

maintenance 

operations

Piper Loop None Other No slow street Important 

residential access

Infantry Terrace Thomas Ave to 

Arguello Blvd Other Local Access

Monitor cutthrough effect of 

suggested Main 

Post closures

West Pacific Ave All

Connects to 

Trail, Gap 

Closure

TBD

Further study 

needed to 

determine closure 

configuration
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 19 of 29

Street Segment Extents Selection 

Criteria

Slow Street 

Type

Top 

Candidate Notes

Fisher Loop None Other No slow street Important chapel 

access

Sheridan Ave All Gap Closure, 

Other TBD

Yes, 

Montgomery 

to Graham

Ord St None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Riley Ave None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Taylor Rd None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Montgomery St All Other TBD Yes

Careful planning 

for business access 

and wayfinding 

required

Anza Ave None Other No slow street Parking lot access

Owen St None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Graham St All

Keyes Ave / Pena St All Other, Gap 

Closure Local Access Possible alternative to Funston

Mesa St All Other, Gap 

Closure Local Access Possible alternative to Funston

Funston Ave All Other Local Access Yes

Moraga Ave All Other Traffic Calming

Arguello Blvd Moraga Blvd to 

Sheridan Ave Other Full Closure

Martinez St None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Barnard Ave All

Trail 

Connection, 

Other

Full Closure Yes

Fernandez 

St/McArthur Ave All

Trail 

Connection, 

Other

Traffic Calming Redundant with 

Barnard 

Morton St All Gap Closure Traffic Calming

Consider closing 

pedestrian gap 

with a trail or 

sidewalk

Halleck St None Other No slow street

Once complete, 

Tunnel Tops will 

serve as a “slow 

street” between 

Main Post and 

Mason Street
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 20 of 29

Street Segment Extents Selection 

Criteria

Slow Street 

Type

Top 

Candidate Notes

Gorgas Ave All Gap Closure, 

Other Traffic Calming

Edie Rd None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Thornburg Rd None Other No slow street No clear benefit

General Kennedy Ave None Other No slow street No clear benefit

O’Reilly Ave None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Torney Ave None

Trail 

Connection, 

Other

No slow street No clear benefit

Letterman Dr All Other Local Access LDAC Garage

Sherman Rd None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Ruger St None Other No slow street No clear benefit

Liggett Ave All Trail 

Connection

Local Access 

Presidio Blvd 

to Clark St or 

Traffic Calming 
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 21 of 29

Figure 4: Map of Slow Street Suitability
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 22 of 29

Top Candidates

For each slow street recommendation, we describe the characteristics of the street, the reasoning 

behind the recommended slow street type, and the expected effects of slow street treatment.

Top Candidate Map

The map shown in Error! Reference source not found. highlights our top priority 

recommendations for slow streets. These selections were made from among the longer list of 

candidate street segments identified in table to fill a gap, connect a trail, or make a good slow 

street for the other reasons described above. 
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 23 of 29

Figure 5: Map of Top Slow Street Recommendations
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 24 of 29

Funston Avenue

Funston Avenue is a two-lane, north-south street connecting Lincoln Boulevard and Moraga 

Avenue, providing access to Crissy Field. Businesses and schools front Funston Avenue but most 

loading activity could be shifted to Mesa Street, which runs parallel. We recommend converting 

Funston Avenue to a local access slow street between the southern side of the YMCA parking lot 

to Moraga Avenue. Funston Avenue is a good candidate for a local access slow street due to the 

high number of schools and opportunity to connect activity centers such as the Inn at the Presidio 

and the Presidio Officers Club with the YMCA and Tunnel Tops (via a direct line to Halleck Street).

A local access slow street is recommended for Funston Avenue to provide a safe space for 

children to walk and bike and for families and visitors on the east side of the Main Post to have a 

direct connection to Crissy Field via Halleck Street. A traffic calming slow street was not selected 

because of the low vehicle volumes and the desire to maximize safety benefits for the land uses 

on the street.

Effects of Slow Street Implementation

Any loading activity that may have occurred on Funston Avenue would be encouraged to use

Mesa Street. Currently, Mesa Street is one-way northbound between Canby Street and Lincoln 

Boulevard but vehicles can still turn onto Funston Avenue if local access is needed. Westbound 

vehicles would be encouraged to access Mesa Street from Presidio Boulevard. Signage should be 

placed at the intersection of Mesa Street and Moraga Avenue to encourage vehicles to turn off 

before reaching Funston Avenue. Before a local access slow street is implemented in Funston, 

evaluate how traffic volumes on Graham Street would be affected. 

Sheridan Avenue

Sheridan Avenue is a two-lane, east-west street connecting Lincoln Boulevard and Graham Street, 

providing access to the Main Post Lawn. We recommend converting two blocks of Sheridan 

Avenue to a full closure slow street between Taylor Road and Arguello Boulevard. Combined with 

a full closure on Montgomery Street, a full closure on Sheridan Avenue would complete a “ring” 

around the Main Post Lawn dedicated to pedestrian and bicycle access. Sheridan Avenue provides 

high-quality east-west pedestrian and bicycle connections in the Main Post. A local access slow 

street type was not selected for these two blocks of Sheridan Avenue because no buildings are

fronting this segment. The segment between Montgomery Street and Anza Avenue has been 

successfully closed during Presidio Picnics.

Effects of Slow Street Implementation

A full closure for two blocks of Sheridan Street would force vehicles to travel around the Main 

Post Lawn, using Moraga Avenue. Mesa Street would still be accessible via Moraga Avenue. 

Vehicle access would still be provided to the parking lots in Main Post via Anza Avenue. Closure 
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 25 of 29

of Sheridan Avenue would create a pedestrian-oriented zone within the Main Post Lawn, while 

still providing vehicle access to all buildings via Moraga Avenue. Moraga Avenue also serves 

loading access for Building 387, requiring vehicle access, thus the need for two parallel streets is 

reduced. 

Arguello Boulevard

Arguello Boulevard is a two-lane, north-south street that provides connection from the southern 

entrance of the Presidio to the Main Post. We recommend converting one block of Arguello 

Boulevard between Sheridan Avenue and Moraga Avenue to a full closure slow street in tangent 

with the two-block closure of Sheridan Avenue between Taylor Road and Arguello Boulevard.

With the closure of Sheridan Avenue, there becomes no need for private vehicles to access this 

block of Arguello Boulevard as there are no loading zones, parking, or driveways. Thus, a local 

access slow street or a traffic calming slow street would provide minimal benefit. The full closure 

of this block would formalize the “ring” of vehicle access around the Main Post Lawn. This section 

of roadway has been successfully used for closures during past Presidio Picnic Events. 

Effects of Slow Street Implementation

A full closure of Arguello Boulevard between Sheridan Avenue and Moraga Avenue would require 

vehicles going to the Main Post parking lot to turn right on Moraga Avenue and use Graham 

Street to get to Anza Avenue. Vehicles looking to exit the Presidio would be required to travel on 

the west side of the Main Post via Moraga Avenue to Lincoln Boulevard if Funston Avenue were to 

also become a local access slow street. 

Barnard Avenue

Barnard Avenue is a single lane two-way road, north-south street providing access to the Ecology 

Trail from Presidio Boulevard. The entire street is currently a slow street, and we recommend it 

remains a full closure slow street, creating an extension of the trails. There are no uses accessed 

via Barnard Avenue, thus a local access slow street or a traffic calming slow street would provide 

minimal benefit. 

Effects of Slow Street Implementation

There would be no impact to vehicle circulation with the full closure of Barnard Avenue. Some 

informal parking near the trail at the end of Barnard Avenue would be eliminated. 

Washington Boulevard

Washington Boulevard is a two-lane, east-west street that provides the main connection between 

the southern entrance at Arguello Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard. A heavily utilized pedestrian 

and bicycle connection, Washington Boulevard serves residential buildings. Washington 

Boulevard is currently a local access slow street, and we recommend the entirety of Washington 
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 26 of 29

Boulevard remain a slow street, with some segments open to local access, some segments 

implemented with traffic calming, and a small segment fully closed. The current slow street 

program implemented on Washington Boulevard in response to the COVID-19 Shelter in Place 

order has been successful; counts taken in December 2020 indicate that approximately 2,700 

bicyclists and pedestrians per day during the week and approximately 4,000 per day during the 

weekend traverse the street. The Presidio Hills shuttle route currently runs on Washington 

Boulevard and will continue to be allowed access. 

Arguello Boulevard to Battery Caulfield Road – Local Access Slow Street

We recommend the segment of Washington Boulevard between Arguello Boulevard and Park 

Boulevard remain a local access slow street due to the number of residential homes that require 

vehicle access. A local access slow street would discourage cut-through traffic through signage 

and traffic calming infrastructure while remaining accessible for private and delivery vehicles. Cutthrough traffic is encouraged to travel on the outer edges of the park to travel east/west.

Battery Caulfield Road to Kobbe Avenue - Traffic Calming Slow Street

We recommend the segment of Washington Boulevard between Park Boulevard and Kobbe 

Avenue convert to a traffic calming slow street to continue minimizing cut-through traffic while 

maintaining local access to residential units and destinations such as campgrounds, playgrounds, 

and look-outs. Traffic calming measures will reduce speeds without restricting vehicle access, 

allowing for safer bicycle and pedestrian travel. 

Kobbe Avenue to Lincoln Boulevard - Full Closure Slow Street

We recommend the short segment of Washington Boulevard between Kobbe Avenue and Lincoln 

Boulevard fully close since there are no destinations or residential buildings. A full closure would 

allow pedestrians and bicyclists to avoid Lincoln Boulevard south of Washington Boulevard where 

vehicle traffic is high and there are no dedicated bike lanes in the downhill direction. North of 

Washington Boulevard, the California Coastal Trail widens and there are striped bike lanes on 

both sides of Lincoln Boulevard to Merchant Road/Storey Avenue. 

Park Boulevard: Kobbe to Washington

We recommend this segment of Park Boulevard as a local access slow street because this 

segment supports the Washington Boulevard treatments by detouring through traffic onto 

alternative routes before they approach the slow street.

Battery Caulfield Road/Wedemeyer Street: Hays Street to Washington Boulevard

Battery Caulfield Road/Wedemeyer Street is a two-lane, north-south street that connects the park 

entrance at 14th and 15th Avenues to Washington Boulevard. The street provides access to 

residential complexes, Playgroup, and Building 1450 the Natural Resources/Landscaping 
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 27 of 29

maintenance facility. Lincoln Boulevard provides a parallel alternate route if through traffic is 

restricted on Battery Caulfield Road/Wedemeyer Street. While the slope of Battery Caulfield is 

higher than eight percent, with an average of 8.8 percent, it is well utilized by pedestrians and 

bicyclists as a current slow street implemented during the COVID-19 Shelter in Place order. 

December 2020 counts indicate approximately 700 pedestrians and bicyclists traverse this 

segment a day during weekdays and approximately 950 per day on weekends. 

Despite the slightly steeper grade, we recommend Battery Caulfield Road/Wedemeyer Street 

remain a slow street to reduce the amount of cut-through traffic and to detour through traffic 

onto alternative routes before they approach the slow street on Washington. We recommend a 

hybrid local access/traffic calming approach that allows through traffic in the downhill direction 

and local access only in the uphill direction. Allowing through traffic in the downhill direction 

provides an outlet for vehicles traveling east on Washington Boulevard that get diverted at the 

Local Access Only signs at Battery Caulfield. 

West Pacific Avenue

West Pacific Avenue is a two-lane, east-west street that runs on the southern perimeter of the 

presidio and provides access to the Presidio Wall Playground and sports fields, the Presidio Golf 

Course, and trails. West Pacific is a low-volume road that provides ample formal and informal 

parking spaces. During the COVID-19 Shelter in Place order, West Pacific was a full closure slow 

street from Arguello Boulevard to Presidio Boulevard and a local access slow street west of 

Arguello. Counts taken in December 2020 indicate that approximately 1,500 bicyclists and 

pedestrians per day travel along West Pacific during the weekday and approximately 1,700 per 

day during the weekend. 

We recommend converting West Pacific, both west and east of Arguello Boulevard, to a slow 

street to restrict cut-through traffic, but further study should be done to determine the 

appropriate type of slow street. Previous considerations for cul de sacs or one-way conversions 

may be worth further exploration. Additional considerations such as bicycle speed and roadway 

grade, should be studied further before implementing slow street treatments. 

Effects of Slow Street Implementation

The restriction to local travel on West Pacific would push cut-through vehicles further south to 

Jackson Street or Washington Street, but there is no need for private vehicles to use West Pacific 

other than accessing the playground, trailheads, and golf course. The reduction in cut-through 

traffic would greatly benefit the pedestrians and bicyclists who use West Pacific for recreation as 

the only east-west street on the southern side of the Presidio. 
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 28 of 29

Streets to Consider

Infantry Terrace

Infantry Terrace is a two-lane residential street near the Main Post that provides a connection 

between Arguello Boulevard and Sheridan Avenue and to the YMCA Tennis Courts. We 

recommend monitoring Infantry Terrace for cut-through traffic as a result of closures in the Main 

Post and consider a local access slow street if necessary. 

Montgomery Street

Montgomery Street is a two-lane, north-south street connecting Lincoln Boulevard and Moraga 

Avenue, providing access to the Main Post Lawn, the Disney Museum, the Lodge at the Presidio, 

Presidio Bowl, and connections to Crissy Field. Different configurations of the Main Post would 

allow Montgomery Street to fully close, but further study should be done to look at the Main Post 

holistically. Montgomery Street is a good candidate for a full closure slow street due to the high 

number of attractions and for its proximity to the Main Post Lawn where numerous pedestrian 

activities occur. Given that ADA access may be a concern for patrons, exceptions could be made 

for loading needs by implementing treatment similar to a local access slow street but with signs 

that say “ADA Access Only.” 

In lieu of a full closure on Montgomery Street, a local access slow street with a diagonal diverter 

at the intersection of Montgomery Street and Sheridan Avenue would help provide a safer space 

for the large number of pedestrians and bicyclists enjoying the Main Post Lawn and attending the 

attractions. Montgomery Street also provides users a direct connection to the forthcoming Tunnel 

Tops project. 

Effects of Slow Street Implementation

A full closure on Montgomery Street would force vehicles to travel around the Main Post Lawn, 

using Taylor Road, Lincoln Boulevard, Sheridan Avenue, Moraga Avenue, and Graham Street. 

Closure of Montgomery would create a pedestrian-oriented zone within the Main Post Lawn, 

while still providing vehicle access to all buildings from parallel roads. Challenges include finding 

solutions with the Disney Museum and the Lodge at the Presidio, who may expect vehicle access 

and front door parking to remain. Potential solutions could include limited ADA access and 

additional wayfinding signs for patrons of the Disney Museum and the Lodge at the Presidio 

directing them to use the parking lots in the Main Post Lawn. Consider providing additional ADA 

parking spaces in Anza parking lot. Due to the high volumes on Graham Street, additional study 

of Graham Street should be done in conjunction with changes to Montgomery Street. The 

Presidio Picnics events have proposed closing this segment of roadway to better connect the 

lawns and bathrooms in Building 103. However, the tenants on the roadways have historically not 

been accommodating of this this request and would need to be diligently included in any 
Matt Starkey & Amy Marshall, Presidio Trust

July 2021

Page 29 of 29

decisions about converting this roadway to a Slow Street. One option could be a renewed effort 

to test this closure out on a trial basis for single-day events such as Presidio Picnic before 

implementing it as a semi-permanent slow street. 
Appendix J: LoTIS Project List
CAPITAL PROJECTS

Project Name Project Score Project Cost

Arguello & Presidio Gates Pedestrian Improvements In Progress $ 310,000

Traffic Counter Installation at 25th Ave, Merchant, 14th/15th and GG Bridge Plaza In Progress $ 75,000

Washington Blvd Bike Improvements In Progress $ 6,006,000

14th/15th Ave Gate Ped & Bike Improvements In Progress $ 1,387,100

Halleck Lighting Improvements In Progress $ 312,000

Presidio: Letterman to Lombard Bike Improvements In Progress $ 91,000

FY26-30 Accessibility Improvements 438 $ 6,325,000

FY31-40 Accessibility Improvements 438 $ 5,750,000

FY41-50 Accessibility Improvements 438 $ 5,865,000

FY22-25 Accessibility Improvements 438 $ 1,424,700

Accessibility Public ROW Plan 398 $ 50,000

Trail Gap Closure: Lincoln between S. Pershing & Kobbe 387 $ 402,700

Storey/ Battery Howe Wagner Bike & Ped Improvements 367 $ 3,429,400

Arguello Ped & Bike Improvements: Gate to Washington 343 $ 356,850

Sidewalk Renewal as Coordinated with Storm Drain Improvements 315 $ 60,000

FY23-25 Sidewalk Renewal ($660,000/year) 315 $ 1,980,000

Lincoln: Gate to S. Pershing Class IV Bike Improvements 278 $ 405,600

Gorgas South Sidewalk 272 $ 345,000

FY22 Pavement Rehabilitation 267 $ 2,415,000

FY23 Pavement Rehabilitation 267 $ 315,000

FY23 Pavement Rehabilitation 267 $ 2,100,000

FY24 Pavement Rehabilitation 267 $ 2,415,000

FY25 Pavement Rehabilitation 267 $ 2,415,000

Greenwich Gate & Presidio Promenade 262 $ 2,024,000

Mason II: Halleck to McDowell 254 $ 2,235,605

Funston Traffic Calming & Bike Route 250 $ 237,250

Lincoln/Bowley/Pershing Intersection 247 $ 390,000

Mason I: Gate to Halleck 244 $ 2,473,505

Kobbe, Lincoln to Park Corridor: Intersection Safety Improvements, Bike Network Improvements, Pedest 243 $ 1,820,000

Washington/Arguello Intersection Reconfiguration 239 $ 805,000

Washington Blvd Pedestrian Improvements 235 $ -

Lincoln-Merchant-Storey Intersection 233 $ 390,000

Marina-Mason-Girard Intersection 231 $ 975,000

Girard Bike Improvements 230 $ 873,600

Sidewalk Gap Closure Mason at mid-Crissy 225 $ 350,000

Slow Streets 2021/2022 196 $ 150,000

Main Post Ped Gap Closures: Multiple Locations 187 $ 1,229,800

Mason III: McDowell to West Bluff parking lot: Separated bikeway, improved crossings, new traffic ci 185 $ 2,780,633

Arguello-Washington to Moraga: Infantry Terrance Intersection Reconfiguration, east sidewalk, downhi 170 $ 2,269,800

Lincoln: Merchant to GG Bride Plaza Ent: Downhill Class II Bike Lane 158 $ 572,000

Presidio Blvd: Gate to Lombard: Low-stress bike/ped network connector 155 $ 1,092,000

McDowell Ave: Lincoln to Mason: New bike path, context-sensitive lighting 147 $ -
Lincoln: Long to Patten: Close ped gap Storey to McDowell, lighting, improve Bike facilities, traffi 145 $ 699,400

Lincoln: Kobbe to Merchant: Improve ped facilities, improve bike connection to GG Bridge, traffic ca 143 $ 6,388,824

Moraga St Sidewalk widening, curb ramps and lighting, Class III bike improvements, traffic calming & 139 $ 387,374

Lincoln: GG Bridge Plaza Ent to Long: Add Class II bike lane, improve trail/roadway intersection. Cl 135 $ 276,900

Mason/McDowell/Crissy Field Ave Intersection: Formalize Bay Trail Improvements, lighting. 128 $ 201,500

Presidio Blvd: Letterman to Mesa: Bike lanes, widen sidewalk, context-sensitive lighting, traffic ca 124 $ 194,675

Battery Caulfield Ped & Bike Improvements 123 $ 1,372,800

Greenough Ped & Bike Improvements & lighting. 122 $ 400,660

Montgomery - Advisory Bike Lanes (pending NCTCD approval) 117 $ 29,250

Ralston Ped & Bike Improvements 117 $ 379,860

Ped/Bike Gateway Improvements: Marina, 15th Ave, Gorgas, 25th Ave 113 $ 260,000

West Pacific: Mtn Lake access gate to Arguello (Slow Street overlap) 112 $ 1,237,600

PresidiGo Route Restructuring: New Route out Arguello gate and/or interlining Hills and Downtown rou 109 $ -

Bowley Bike & Pedestrian Improvements 109 $ 404,950

South Hills Ped Gap Closure 107 $ 1,081,600

Letterman Drive: Prioritize buses, bikes and local access 102 $ 383,630

West Pacific: Arguello to Presidio: Improve ped faciltiies, charge for parking, stormwater managemen 97 $ 459,550

Torney Corridor Ped & Wayfinding Improvements 82 $ 364,000

Park Trail: South of Washington 82 $ 2,540,200

Park Trail: Washington to Lincoln 82 $ 1,314,040

Graham Street Lighting Improvements 80 $ 208,000

Trail Improvements between Arguello and Ecology Trail 77 $ -

Presidio Promenade: McDowell to Long: Improve connection between Ruckman and Patten, lighting 72 $ 271,700

Sheridan Class II Bike Completion & Pavement Removal 70 $ 61,776

Lincoln: Patten to Sheridan: Improve trail/Lincoln intersections at Patten and Sheridan 62 $ 442,000

East Housing Ped Gap Closure 59 $ 1,151,800

Arguello: Moraga to Sheridan: Close gap Sheridan to Moraga. Remove excess pavement. 52 $ 121,160

Park Blvd: Washington to Lincoln: Striping, lighting & pavement removal 51 $ 357,500

Lombard Safety Improvements, ped gap & lighting. 47 $ 41,860

Lovers' Lane Widening 43 $ 1,996,800

Traffic Management: Lincoln from Gate to GG Bridge: improve ped facilities & lighting. 39 $ 345,800

Harrison: Discourage vehicles, consider lighting. 39 $ 28,600

Traffic Management: Lombard/Presidio: Turn restrictions and/or traffic calming 34 $ 68,900

Battery East Trail between GGB and Lincoln (Area A): Consider context-sensitive lighting 29 $ 325,000

Pavement Removal / Green Stormwater Improvements: Parkwide 22 $ 6,598,462
PROGRAMMATIC PROJECTS

Project Name Project Score Project Cost

Battery Electric Bus Fleet Conversion (3) n/a $ 2,400,000

Battery Electric Bus Fleet Conversion (2) n/a $ 1,600,000

Battery Electric Bus Fleet Conversion (2) n/a $ 1,600,000

Bus Stop Accessibility & Amenity Improvements n/a $ 60,000

Battery Electric Bus Charging Station - Transit Center and Ft. Scott n/a $ 1,611,087

Main Post Circulation Plan n/a $ 39,000

Pay-by-Plate Park-wide Implemenation n/a $ 25,000

Pay by Plate Pilot n/a $ 5,000

Guardrail Renewal n/a $ 300,000

Bus Yard Relocation n/a $ 1,200,000

Parking Meter Replacement Phase 2 n/a $ 150,000

Communicate rates by the hour and only use hourly rates that end in $0.50 or $1.00 increments. n/a $ -

Delegate authority to approve rates to Transportation Manager within ET and Board approved rules. n/a $ -

Different hourly rates for weekdays vs. weekends. In parking rate zones that have high parking deman n/a $ -

Make planned shift to enforce via license plate recognition (LPR). n/a $ -

Expand parking management to currently unregulated areas of the park. n/a $ -

Reduce number of pricing zones. n/a $ -

Use pre-determined higher hourly special events rates at all paid parking. n/a $ -

Communicate rate changes via digital screen on pay stations, simplified PDF map, e-mail messages to n/a $ -

Use time limits sparingly; otherwise use pricing to ensure turnover in high-demand areas. n/a $ -

Implement demand-based parking rate structure within Board-approved range. n/a $ -

Adjust rates by $0.50 every 6-12 months if occupancy data warrants. n/a $ -

Develop a comprehensive public-facing document that summarizes the how the Trust manages parking (e. n/a $ -

Eliminate the daily rate. Charge for parking only by the hour n/a $ -

Explore new source for occupancy data: aerial imagery, LPR or payment data. n/a $ -

Explore how to have (or increase) consequences for not paying for parking citations. n/a $ -

Hire a Trust employee or contractor to enforce parking and other duties. n/a $ -

PresidiGo Stops Relocation n/a $ -

PresidiGo Inner Richmond Pilot n/a $ -

Interline Downtown and PH routes n/a $ -

High-speed internet in residential neighborhoods n/a $ -

Annual employee transportation coordinatior training n/a $ -

Develop program for corporate carshare and bikeshare memberships n/a $ -

Implement more aggressive telecommute policies n/a $ -

Annual tenant surveys, monitoring, and program adjustments n/a $ 2,000

PresidiGo Service Frequency Adjustments n/a $ -

Bike Rack Expansion n/a $ 28,750

Presidio Vehicle Pricing/Fee Collection n/a $ 400,000

Bike Station Installation II (4 stations) Ruger, Tunnel Tops, Tides, East n/a $ -

Dockless Bike Expansion n/a $ 160,000

MUNI 30 Extension II n/a $ 1,800,000

PresidiGo Signage Upgrade II n/a $ 50,000