alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29695]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-34-000]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of GSR Revised Tariff Sheets

November 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 31, 1997, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets with the proposed 
effective date of November 1, 1997:

Tariff Sheets Applicable to Contesting Parties

Thirty Fourth Revised Sheet No. 14
Fifty Fifth Revised Sheet No. 15
Thirty Fourth Revised Sheet No. 16
Fifth Fifth Revised Sheet No. 17
Thirty Seventh Revised Sheet No. 29

    Southern submits the revised tariff sheets to its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Seventh Revised Volume No. 1, to reflect a change in its FT/FT-NN GSR 
Surcharge, due to a decrease in GSR billing units effective November 1, 
1997.
    Southern states that copies of the filing were served upon all 
parties listed on the official service list compiled by the Secretary 
in these proceedings.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure. All Such motions or protests should be 
filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protest will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of Southern's 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29695 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Ada PETILLO et al., Appellees.

No. 40599.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 7, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 4, 1971.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Barry L. Garber, Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals from an Order entered by the Criminal Court of Record, Dade County, in which Fla.Stat. § 800.03, F.S.A. was held unconstitutional.

The Order is reversed on authority of (Hoffman v. Carson, Fla., 250 So.2d 891, filed July 7, 1971.

The cause is remanded for continuation of the proceedings below.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
31.2



MATEON
THERAPEUTICS, INC.



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Amit Shah, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mateon Therapeutics, Inc.;                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report;



|By:                | /s/
    Amit Shah                                                         | 
|------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                   | Amit
    Shah                                                             | 
|                   | Chief
    Financial Officer (Principal Financial and
 Accounting Officer) | 
|                   |                                                                           | 
|Date: May 20, 2020 |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 of Addus HomeCare Corporation (the
Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Heaney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/    MARK S.
HEANEY                
|                     |  |     |  | Mark S. Heaney                       
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, George E. Crapple, certify that (i) the Annual Report of Millburn Multi-Markets Fund L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





/s/George E. CrappleGeorge E. CrappleCo-Chief Executive OfficerMillburn Ridgefield CorporationGeneral PartnerMillburn Multi-Markets Fund L.P.March 30, 2011
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2004, of El Paso CGP Company (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Douglas L. Foshee, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify (i) that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Douglas L. Foshee
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Douglas L. Foshee
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)

                                       December 21, 2004








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso CGP Company and will be retained by El Paso CGP Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 The undersigned, Brian J. Kelley, the Chief Executive Officer of
Cognitronics Corporation (the "Company"), has executed this
certification in connection with the filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results
     of operations of the Company.


DATED this 12th day of November 2004.

/s/ Brian J. Kelley
-------------------
Brian J. Kelley

Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. David MILLER.

No. 60285.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1977.

In re: David Miller applying for writs of certiorari and review.

Writ denied. There is some evidence to support the trial judge’s determination.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29251]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4273-000]


Cargill-IEC, L.L.C.; Notice of Issuance of Order

October 31, 1997.
    Cargill-IEC, L.L.C. (Cargill-IEC) filed an application for 
authorization to sell electric capacity and energy at market-based 
rates, and for certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, 
Cargill-IEC requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 
18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liabilities by Cargill-IEC. On October 17, 1997, the Commission issued 
an Order Conditionally Accepting for Filing Proposed Market-Based Rates 
(Order), in the above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's October 17, 1997 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (D), (E), and (G):
    (D) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by Cargill-IEC 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (E) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (D) above, Cargill-IEC is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of Cargill-IEC, compatible with 
the public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (G) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of Cargill-
IEC's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities* * *.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is November 17, 1997.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29251 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Terrance SAYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-260.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 26, 1972.

*43Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Andrew I. Friedrich, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order revoking probation and sentencing defendant to 18 months in prison.

Defendant was charged with breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. He was subsequently sentenced to one year in jail on September 17, 1971, after entry of -a no contest plea. Defendant filed a motion to mitigate on October 19, 1971, which was granted on December 21, 1971. The trial court withdrew adjudication and sentence and placed defendant on three years probation. Defendant was later sentenced to 18 months for violation of probation.

The trial court was without jurisdiction to mitigate defendant’s sentence because more than 60 days had elapsed since imposition of the sentence, F.R.Cr.Proc. 3.800 (b), 33 F.S.A., and the term of court during which it was imposed had expired, Laws of Florida, Ch. 59-877, § 3 (1959).

Upon authority of Ware v. State, Fla. App.1970, 231 So.2d 872, and State v. Evans, Fla.App. 1969, 225 So.2d 548, cert. den. 229 So.2d 261, we reverse and remand to the trial court with instructions to reinstate the original sentence of September 17, 1971, with credit for time served.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
#### State of Missouri Defendant in Error, *vs.*John R. Knox, Plaintiff in Error.

I. *Money brokers*— Licenses—Counties—State.—Under the Statutes *W.*S., *247*$ 1; *Id.,*1196, § 76,) the county courts are empowered to levy taxes and exact licenses from money brokers, for State and county purposes.

*Error to Lincoln Circuit Court.*

*C. E. Peers,*for Bespondent.

Ewing, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendant was indicted at the March Term, 1871, of the Lincoln Circuit Court, for carrying on the business of a money broker without a license.

The cause was submitted to the court upqn the following agreed statement of facts, namely: That in March 1871, defendant was engaged in the business of money broker or exchange dealer, in the County of Lincoln; that about that time, the collector of Lincoln County demanded of him one hundred dollars for State and County licenses, fifty dollars of which was for the State and the remainder for the County, that the defendant tendered to the said collector the sum of fifty dollars for the State, which the collector refused to accept, but refused to pay the other amount claimed to be due the county, on the ground that the , sheriff had no right to demand and the county no right to levy this tax in addition to the tax levied upon, the capita], for county purposes. It was further agreed, that the only action taken by the County Court of Lincoln County in reference to the tax on money brokers and exchange dealers is an order of said court, dated December 21st, 1870, which is as follows: The court grant a license to John B. Knox to keep a money broker or exchange dealers office in Troy for six months, ending February 28th, *4191871, by paying the County Collector the sum of fifty dollars for the State and fifty dollars for the County ; that said order was made without the knowledge and not at the instance of the said Knox. It is further admitted, that the defendant pursued the business of money broker or exchange dealer without either State or County license. Upon these facts the court found the defendant guilty in manner and form as charged in the indictment, and assessed the tine at one thousand dollars. A motion for a new trial was overruled, and the cause is brought here by writ of error.

> “ No person or association of persons shall carry on the business of dealing in, or buying or selling, &c., any kind of bills of exchange, checks, draft bank notes, &c., without a license for that purpose continuing in force.” (1 Wag. Stat.; 217, § 1, of chapter concerning Brokers.) *“*County Courts are empowered to levy such sums as may be annually necessary to defray the expenses of their respective counties, by a tax upon all property and licenses made taxable by law for State purposes.” (2 Wag. Stat., 1196, § 76.)

Upon the facts admitted, defendant was clearly liable, and the fine was properly imposed. Judgment affirmed.

The other Judges concur.
# L_2006043EN.01000101.xml

| 14.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 43/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 43/1

---

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) for the financial year 2005 — Amending budget 2

(2006/71/EC)

Pursuant to Article 7 of the Cedefop Decision of 31 March 2003 on the financial rules applicable to the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training in conformity with the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 (Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities), the statement of revenue and expenditure and the list of posts shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

REVENUE

TITLE 3

PAYMENTS FROM THIRD PARTIES

CHAPTER 3 2 —OTHER PAYMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION

3 2 2PHARE agreement 2005/099-243

| Financial year 2005 | AB 2005 | Total 2005 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| — | 200 000 | 200 000 |

Financial year 2005

AB 2005

Total 2005

—

200 000

200 000

EXPENDITURE

TITLE 3

OPERATING EXPENDITURE

CHAPTER 3 1 —PARTICIPATION OF NON-MEMBER STATES IN THE WORK PROGRAMME

3 1 2Specific activities

3 1 2 2PHARE agreement 2005/099-243

| Financial year 2005 | AB 2005 | Total 2005 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| — | 200 000 | 200 000 |

Financial year 2005

AB 2005

Total 2005

—

200 000

200 000

---
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00089

- CR

W ILLIAM E DWARD M UIRHEAD

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 78th District

Court

of Wichita County ( 59,229

- B )

September 30, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in t he trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 49511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19748]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9900-00-OAR]

Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC): Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announces a public 
meeting of the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC). The EPA 
established the CAAAC on November 19, 1990, to provide independent 
advice and counsel to EPA on policy issues associated with 
implementation of the Clean Air Act of 1990. The Committee advises on 
economic, environmental, technical, scientific and enforcement policy 
issues.

DATES AND ADDRESSES:  Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 2 Section 10(a) (2), 
notice is hereby given that the CAAAC will hold its next meeting on 
October 16, 2013, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the EPA Conference 
Facility at Potomac Yard, One Potomac Yard, Potomac Yard South, 2777 S. 
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA 22202. Non-EPA attendees will need to 
present photo identification for entrance into the building. Seating 
will be available on a first come, first served basis. The Permits, New 
Source Review and Toxics Subcommittee will meet at the same location on 
October 15, 2013, from 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Inspection of Committee Documents: The Committee agenda and any 
documents prepared for the meeting will be publicly available on the 
CAAAC Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac/ prior to the meeting. 
Thereafter, these documents, together with CAAAC meeting minutes, will 
also be available on the CAAAC Web site or by contacting the Office of 
Air and Radiation Docket and requesting information under docket EPA-
HQ-OAR-2004-0075. The Docket office can be reached by email at: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov or FAX: 202-566-9744.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information about the CAAAC, 
please contact Jeneva Craig, Designated Federal Officer (DFO), Office 
of Air and Radiation, U.S. EPA by telephone at (202) 564-1674 or by 
email at craig.jeneva@epa.gov. For information on the Permits, New 
Source Review and Toxics subcommittee, please contact Liz Naess at 
(919) 541-1892. Additional Information on these meetings, CAAAC, and 
its Subcommittees can be found on the CAAAC Web site: http://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac/.
    For information on access or services for individuals with 
disabilities, please contact Ms. Jeneva Craig at (202) 564-1674 or 
craig.jeneva@epa.gov, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting 
to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: August 7, 2013.
Jeneva Craig,
Designated Federal Officer, Clean Air Act Advisory Committee, Office of 
Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2013-19748 Filed 8-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit (j)



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of Cash Reserve Fund, Inc. on Form N-1A ("Registration Statement") of
our report dated February 28, 2008 relating to the financial statements and
financial highlights which appears in the December 31, 2007 Annual Report to the
Shareholders of the Cash Reserve Fund - Prime Series, which is also incorporated
by reference into the Registration Statement. We also consent to the references
to us under the headings "Financial Statements", "Financial Highlights" and
"Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in such Registration Statement.


/s/Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
April 25, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN CORNISH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 165 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of October, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Page 1 of 7
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 2 of 7
 

 

 

 

Page 3 of 7
Page 4 of 7
Page 5 of 7
 

 

Page 6 of 7
 

Page 7 of 7
No. 00-6303.

#### Wright *v.*Texas.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Cer-tiorari denied.