alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         412,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  290,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,772
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               866,401
<PP&E>                                         276,617
<DEPRECIATION>                                 182,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,078,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          311,185
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       871,286
<OTHER-SE>                                   (153,763)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,078,708
<SALES>                                      1,020,886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,020,886
<CGS>                                          499,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  941,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             57,697
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,697
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
No. 9494.

#### National Biscuit Co. et al. *v.*Douglass et al., Partners.

(Decided November 27, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Richland County.

*598*Merrs. Jenner & Weldon,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Donnell, Marriott & Bissman,*for defendants in error.

On rehearing. Former judgment adhered to.

Price, Crew, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
# L_2005230EN.01001001.xml

| 7.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 230/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 230/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1451/2005

of 6 September 2005

correcting Regulation (EC) No 950/2005 setting the export refunds for nuts (shelled almonds, hazelnuts in shell, shelled hazelnuts and walnuts in shell) using system A1

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 35(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 950/2005 (2) fixed the export refunds for nuts (shelled almonds, hazelnuts in shell, shelled hazelnuts and walnuts in shell) using system A1. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 950/2005 (2) fixed the export refunds for nuts (shelled almonds, hazelnuts in shell, shelled hazelnuts and walnuts in shell) using system A1.

| (2) | An error has been discovered in the Annex to the draft submitted to the Management Committee for an opinion. Regulation (EC) No 950/2005 should therefore be corrected. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An error has been discovered in the Annex to the draft submitted to the Management Committee for an opinion. Regulation (EC) No 950/2005 should therefore be corrected.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fresh Fruit and Vegetables, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fresh Fruit and Vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 950/2005, in the first line, ‘8 September 2005’ is replaced by ‘9 January 2006’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 160, 23.6.2005, p. 17.

2

---
#### Robert Randolph HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 0-95.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 12, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Ecochild Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vladimir Enachi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Vladimir Enachi                                                      

Vladimir Enachi, Chief Financial Officer

 

Dated: January 26, 2010

 

 

----
SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES

                                 -----------------

                             DWS International Fund

                      DWS International Select Equity Fund


The following information supplements the "Portfolio management" section of each
above-noted fund's prospectuses:

  Chris LaJaunie, CFA
  Director of Deutsche Asset Management and Portfolio Manager of the fund.
  o  Joined Deutsche Asset Management in 2006 as an analyst for International
     Equity and International Select Equity strategies: New York.
  o  Prior to that, nine years of experience as portfolio manager for Morgan
     Stanley Capital Strategy, and as equity analyst for Oaktree Capital
     Management, JP Morgan Securities and Scudder Kemper Investments.
  o  Joined the fund in 2008.
  o  BA, MA from Louisiana State University.








               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference


March 3, 2008                                                 [DWS SCUDDER LOGO]
DMF-3665                                                     Deutsche Bank Group
Exhibit
34.2


Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







The Board
of Directors




Citibank,
N.A.:




We have
examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix I, that
the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or Company) complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly issued (i.e., transaction-level
reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities and student loan-backed
securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company
provides trustee and paying agent services (the Platform), except for
servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii),
1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv),
which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it
performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2009. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our
examination.





Our
examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing
criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance
with the servicing criteria.





In our
opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2009 is fairly stated, in all material respects.







(Signed)
KPMG LLP




Chicago,
Illinois


February 26,
2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Proteonomix, Inc.. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael Cohen

Michael Cohen

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 29, 2011
Table of Contents


Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA CODE) Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States of America Code), each of the undersigned officers of Pampa Energía S.A. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: June 30, 2010
     /s/ Ricardo Alejandro TorresName:
     Ricardo Alejandro TorresTitle:
     Chief Executive OfficerDate: June 30, 2010
     /s/ Roberto Luis MaestrettiName:
     Roberto Luis MaestrettiTitle:
     Chief Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States of America Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.


---
#### Byron BAXLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-940.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 6, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
33.2





MANAGEMENT’S
ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE





Management
of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is
responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.





Management
has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are
applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as
follows:





Platform:  Publicly-issued
(i.e., transaction-level
reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities and student loan-backed
securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides
trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”)





Applicable Servicing
Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to
the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any
transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv),
1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)
and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not
applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform
(the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).





Period:  Twelve
months ended December 31, 2009 (the “Period”).





With
respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management
provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable
Servicing Criteria:




·
            The
      Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance
      with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria.




·
            The
      Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
      Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the
      criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph
      (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.




·
            Based
      on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects,
      with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria.




KPMG LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.





CITIBANK,
N.A.





By: /s/
Karen Montbach





Its:  Managing
Director





Dated:
February 26, 2010
# L_2007079EN.01004101.xml

| 20.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 79/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 79/41

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 of 27 June 2005 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 169 of 30 June 2005
  )

On Page 19, in Annex II, in the ‘List of products included in the arrangements referred to in Article 1(2) (a) and (b)’:

for:

| ‘0208 | Other meat and edible meat offal, fresh, chilled or frozen: (1) | S |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0208 10 | Of rabbits or hares | S |
| 0208 20 00 | Frogs' legs | NS |
| 0208 30 00 | Of primates | S |
| 0208 40 00 | Of whales, dolphins and porpoises (mammals of the order Cetacea); of manatees and dugongs (mammals of the order Sirenia) | S |
| 0208 50 | Of reptiles (including snakes and turtles) | S |
| ex 0208 90 | Other, excluding products of 0208 90 55 | S |

‘0208

Other meat and edible meat offal, fresh, chilled or frozen: (1)

S

0208 10

Of rabbits or hares

S

0208 20 00

Frogs' legs

NS

0208 30 00

Of primates

S

0208 40 00

Of whales, dolphins and porpoises (mammals of the order Cetacea); of manatees and dugongs (mammals of the order Sirenia)

S

0208 50

Of reptiles (including snakes and turtles)

S

ex 0208 90

Other, excluding products of 0208 90 55

S

read:

| ‘ex 0208 | Other meat and edible meat offal, fresh, chilled or frozen, excluding products of 0208 90 55  (2) (except 0208 20 00 for which the footnote does not apply) | S |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0208 20 00 | Frogs' legs | NS |

‘ex 0208

Other meat and edible meat offal, fresh, chilled or frozen, excluding products of 0208 90 55  (2) (except 0208 20 00 for which the footnote does not apply)

S

0208 20 00

Frogs' legs

NS

---

---
#### John BEEBE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, County of Dade, Respondent.

No. 69-742.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 9, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                DRAFT

[LETTERHEAD KPMG Peat Marwick LLP]

            1500 National City Center     Telephone 216 696 9100  
            1900 East Ninth Street        Telefax   216 696 7792
            Cleveland, OH  44114-3495


The Board of Directors
Corrpro Companies, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-38767) on Form S-8 of Corrpro Companies, Inc. of our report dated May 8,
1998, except for Note 13, as to which the date is May 19, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Corrpro Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
March 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report
appears in the March 31, 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Corrpro Companies,
Inc.



KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
June 3, 1998
258 La. 905

#### James FISHER v. ALBANY MACHINE AND SUPPLY COMPANY et al. Thelma LEONARD et al. v. ALBANY MACHINE AND SUPPLY COMPANY et al.

No. 51435.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1971.

In re: James Fisher and Thelma Leonard et al. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Helena. 246 So.2d 218; 246 So.2d 230.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

Granted as to assignment of error No. 1, relating to jurisdiction over Albany Machine & Supply Co. & Dorris Co. In all other respects the application is denied.
No. 9790.

#### Hazen, Admx., *v.*The Stark Electric Railroad Co.

(Decided October 2, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Stark County.'

*Messrs. Craine & Snyder,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Webber & Turner,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### Alan MATRACHT, Appellant, v. Milton FRIEDBERG et al., Appellees.

No. 71-58.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59881-59882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29207]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary

Senior Executive Service; Appointment of a Member to the 
Performance Review Board

    Title 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) provides that Notice of the appointment 
of an individual to serve as a member of the Performance Review Board 
of the Senior Executive Service shall be published in the Federal 
Register.
    The following individuals are hereby appointed to a three-year term 
on the Department's Performance Review Board:

[[Page 59882]]

Kathryn Higgins
Joseph Juarez

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Larry K. Goodwin, Director of 
Human Resources, Room C5526, U.S. Department of Labor, Fances Perkins 
Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210, 
telephone: (202) 219-6551.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 28th day of October, 1997.
Alexis M. Herman,
Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 97-29207 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-M
```
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
MARY LEWIS BUTLER , P

etitioner
,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AR MY , Respondent

.

______________________
201 3- 3171

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT0752120838 -I-2.

______________________ ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Mary L. Butler moves for a 30

- day extension of time, until December 18, 2013, to file her informal brief

.
U pon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : Case: 13-3171 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 12/03/2013BUTLER V

. ARMY 2

The motion is granted.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s27 Case: 13-3171 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 12/03/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>             THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
                     EXTRACTED  FROM  THE  COASTAL   CORPORATION  FORM  10-Q
                     QUARTERLY  REPORT FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,
                     1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                     SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          21
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                    595
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,089
<PP&E>                                      11,454
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,151
<BONDS>                                      3,805
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          400
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                        72
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,994
<SALES>                                      5,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,589
<CGS>                                        3,330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                432
<INCOME-TAX>                                   125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            307
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   307
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.39
        

</TABLE>