alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 381 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to include a criminal penalty 

and a ground of removability for financing the unlawful entry of an 

alien into the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. BRAUN, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. CRUZ, 

Mrs. BRITT, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to include 

a criminal penalty and a ground of removability for 

financing the unlawful entry of an alien into the United 

States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Coyote Cash Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 381 IS

1 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTY AND REMOVABILITY FOR FI2 NANCING UNLAWFUL ENTRY. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 8 of title II of the Immi4 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1321 et seq.) is 

5 amended by inserting after section 274D the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 274E. FINANCING UNLAWFUL ENTRY. 

7 ‘‘Any person who transmits money, property, or any 

8 item of value through interstate commerce with the intent 

9 to finance a violation of section 273, 274, 275, 276, or 

10 277 shall be fined the value of the transmitted money, 

11 property, or item of value, imprisoned not more than 1 

12 year, or both.’’. 

13 (b) INADMISSIBILITY.—Section 212(a)(2) of the Im14 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)) is 

15 amended by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(J) FINANCING UNLAWFUL ENTRY.—Any 

17 alien who has been convicted of, admits having 

18 committed, or admits committing acts that con19 stitute the elements of an offense under section 

20 274E is inadmissible.’’. 

21 (c) DEPORTABILITY.—Section 237(a)(2) of the Im22 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)) is 

23 amended by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(G) FINANCING UNLAWFUL ENTRY.—Any 

25 alien who has been convicted of, admits having 

26 committed, or admits committing acts that conVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:04 Feb 27, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S381.IS S381

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 381 IS

1 stitute the elements of an offense under section 

2 274E is deportable.’’. 

3 (d) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con4 tents for the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

5 1101 et seq.) is amended by inserting after the item relat6 ing to section 274D the following: 

‘‘Sec. 274E. Financing unlawful entry.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Ross HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 77-1135 and 77-1360.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 27, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 24, 1978.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bar-tow, for appellant.

*915Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the judgment and sentence entered on his conviction of aggravated assault because the trial court did not instruct the jury on attempted aggravated assault.

The state charged appellant with aggravated assault and obstructing or opposing an officer with violence. At trial, the court instructed the jury on aggravated assault, obstructing a police officer with violence, simple assault, improper exhibition of a firearm, and obstructing a police officer without violence. Defense counsel requested an instruction on attempted aggravated assault. The court denied this request. Thereafter, the jury found appellant guilty of aggravated assault and obstructing an officer without violence.

Under Florida Criminal Procedure Rule 3.510 the trial court must charge on an attempt to commit a crime if such attempt is also an offense, and we cannot consider its failure to do so to be harmless error. *Lomax v. State,*345 So.2d 719 (Fla.1977); *Irving v. State,*337 So.2d 1014 (Fla.2d DCA 1976).

The judgment and sentence are reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In a petition for rehearing the state argues that in logic there can be no crime of attempted aggravated assault. *See Hutchinson*v. *State,*315 So.2d 546 (Fla.2d DCA 1976). Thus, if the attempt to commit the crime charged does not constitute a separate offense, it would not be error to fail to give an instruction on attempt. *King v. State,*339 So.2d 172 (Fla.1976).

This contention overlooks the fact that in *State v. White,*324 So.2d 630 (Fla.1975), our supreme court observed that one whose presence never became known to his intended victim because of an unsuccessful attack from behind could be prosecuted for attempted assault. If attempted assault is a crime, then obviously attempted aggravated assault would also be a crime where a weapon was used. If the attempt to commit the crime charged is a separate offense, it makes no difference that the facts of the case do not warrant the conclusion that the charged crime was not consummated. *Lomax v. State, supra.*

The petition for rehearing is denied.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.
#### Joan Mildred SELLEY and Wilbur Webb Selley, Petitioners, v. Peter M. DeMANIO, Judge of the Circuit Court, Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Orange County, Florida.

No. 44350.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 30, 1973.

Cause dismissed. 283 So.2d 893.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            3983
<SECURITIES>                                      8000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5496
<ALLOWANCES>                                        37
<INVENTORY>                                       4813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 23609
<PP&E>                                            3612
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   27593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4630
<BONDS>                                            120
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           746
<OTHER-SE>                                       19914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     27593
<SALES>                                           7804
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7804
<CGS>                                             3403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2434
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (82)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2049
<INCOME-TAX>                                       766
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1283
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1283
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cindy J. McPike, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 8, 2005                                          
|                                                                 
|/S/ CINDY J. MCPIKE                                              
|Cindy J. McPike Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         992,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,900,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,950,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,482,000
<PP&E>                                       9,451,030
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,862,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,072,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,725,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,846,000
<COMMON>                                     1,794,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,597,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                70,072,000
<SALES>                                     11,870,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,870,000
<CGS>                                        5,977,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,350,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               380,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             169,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,649,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   534,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            909,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   953,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Variable Series I, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| August 20, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark   |
|-----------------|-----------------------|
|            | Michael G. Clark      |
|            | President             |
|            | DWS Variable Series I |

 

 

----
#### LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Lena Mae GRANT, a/k/a Lena Davis Grant, Appellee.

No. 73-722.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Juel Hobbs TATUM, Appellant, v. The GRAND UNION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-1110.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 16, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Aug, 14, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL T. PARSONS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 367

[ October 13, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Kirk Volker , Judge; L.T.

Case No. 502012CF000860AMB

.

Michael T. Parsons, Miami, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., M AY and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.27 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Instrument Amending the Treaty of 

December 20, 1999 

Between the UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA and CYPRUS 

Signed at Nicosia January 20, 2006 

with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 CYPRUS 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Instrument amending the treaty of December 20, 1999. 

Signed at Nicosia January 20, 2006; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-13, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-13, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Instruments of Ratification at Nicosia 

 July 13, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010. 

With annex.
EXHIBIT 10.12





PROMISSORY NOTE








$10,000.00
November 30, 2010Austin, Texas


FOR VALUE, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Restaurant Concepts of America, a Nevada company referred to as (“Borrower”), promises to pay to Pete Wainscott (“Lender”), or order, at Austin, Texas, or as otherwise instructed, the principal sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) in lawful tender of the United States, together with simple interest thereon at an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%).





Terms of Repayment. This Promissory Note shall become due and payable together will all accrued interest on November 30, 2011.





Default.  Any one or more of the following events shall constitute a Default under the terms of this Note:





1)
Borrower fail to make timely payment when due.


2)
Borrower breaches an agreement or promise made to Lender, or fails to timely perform any obligation owing to Lender


3)
Borrower makes any representation or statement to Lender that is false or misleading in any material manner.


4)
Borrower becomes insolvent, or a receiver is appointed for any part of all of Borrower’s property, of Borrower makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or any proceeding is brought either by Borrower of against Borrower under any Bankruptcy or insolvency laws.





In the event of any default as described herein, Lender, without further protest, presentment or notice, may declare all sums due and payable, together with any interest then due.





Waiver.  Forbearance of any payment due of modification of any term of this Note by Lender in any manner shall not be deemed nor construed as a waiver of any other rights in favor of Lender under the terms of this Notice.





Legal.  This Note shall be construed in accordance with the laws of that State of Texas, which shall be the choice of jurisdiction and venue for purposes of enforcement of this Note.  If any action is brought to enforce any provision or collect on this Note, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement for all reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.




Restaurant Concepts of AmericaBy: /s/ David ChoDavid Cho - President / CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3836 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3836

    To improve drought-related disaster assistance programs of the 
           Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 29, 2024

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To improve drought-related disaster assistance programs of the 
           Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Crawfish Recovery Assistance from 
Weather Disasters And Droughts Act'' or the ``CRAWDAD Act''.

SEC. 2. EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOR LIVESTOCK, HONEY BEES, AND FARM-RAISED 
              FISH PROGRAM.

    Section 1501(d) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9081(d)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``drought,'' after 
        ``adverse weather,'';
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by inserting ``adverse weather, drought,'' 
                after ``disease,''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``and losses of crawfish harvest 
                due to adverse weather or drought'' after ``cattle tick 
                fever''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Documentation standards.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the Secretary, in consultation with eligible 
        producers of farm-raised fish, shall establish a documentation 
        standard for each of the following:
                    ``(A) Collecting data.
                    ``(B) Production of crawfish, as related to 
                reductions in harvest.
                    ``(C) Defining loss conditions due to drought.''.

SEC. 3. LIVESTOCK FORAGE DISASTER PROGRAM.

    Section 1501(c)(1)(A)(i) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 
9081(c)(1)(A)(i)) is amended, in the matter preceding subclause (I), by 
striking ``means livestock'' and inserting ``means livestock, whether 
weaned or unweaned,''.
                                 <all>
```
#### State of Missouri, Appellant, *vs.*Wesley R. Love, Respondent.

1. Practice, *criminal*— Appeals—Final *judgments*— Demurrers—Indictments.— Where a demurrer to an indictment is sustained, but no final judgment is given on the demurrer, an appeal will be dismissed.

*Appeal from Linn Circuit Court.*

*Daniel Metcalf,*for Appellant.

*Geo. W. Easley,*for Respondent,

There is no final judgment from which an appeal will lie. (State vs. Gregory, 38 Mo., 501.)

Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an indictment under the statute concerning false pretenses. A demurrer was sustained to the indictment, but no final judgment was rendered on the demurrer. In*107stead of rendering final judgment the court ordered the defendant into custody to abide the further action of the grand jury then in session.

There being no final judgment, the appeal will be dismissed. (See State vs. Gregory, 38 Mo., 501 ; 2 W. S., 1114, § 14; State vs. Martindale, 51 Mo., decided February Term, 1873.)

Appeal dismissed.

The other judges concur.

THE END OK KEBRUARY TEEM 1873, AT ST. JOSEPH.

*108OASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE -STATE OF MISSOURI. MARCH TERM, 18*73, AT ST. LOUIS.
# DailyTreasuryRealYieldCurveRateData
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3492 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to establish a criminal penalty 

for interfering with commerce by blocking public roads. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to establish a criminal penalty for interfering with commerce by blocking 

public roads. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe and Open Streets 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CRIME OF INTERFERENCE WITH COMMERCE BY 

7 BLOCKING PUBLIC ROADS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1951 of title 18, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3492 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as 

2 subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(b) INTERFERENCE WITH COMMERCE BY BLOCK6 ING PUBLIC ROADS.— 

7 ‘‘(1) OFFENSE.—It shall be unlawful to, in any 

8 way or degree, purposely obstruct, delay, or affect 

9 commerce or the movement of any article or com10 modity in commerce by blocking a public road or 

11 highway, or to attempt or conspire so to do. 

12 ‘‘(2) PENALTY.—Any person who violates para13 graph (1) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned 

14 not more than 5 years, or both.’’. 

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

16 (1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of section 

17 1951 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 

18 striking ‘‘by threats or violence’’. 

19 (2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections 

20 for chapter 95 of title 18, United States Code, is 

21 amended by striking the item relating to section 

22 1951 and inserting the following: 

‘‘1951. Interference with commerce.’’. 

23 (3) CROSS REFERENCES.— 

24 (A) TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE.—Sec25 tion 8332(o)(2)(B)(xx) of title 5, United States 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3492 IS

1 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘by threats of vio2 lence’’. 

3 (B) TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE.— 

4 Part I of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (i) in section 1961(1), by striking ‘‘, 

7 robbery, or extortion’’; and 

8 (ii) in section 2516(1)(c), by striking 

9 ‘‘by threats or violence’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB