alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1668 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1668

 To extend the authority for agencies to reimburse paid leave provided 
by Federal contractors to certain employees or subcontractors unable to 
               perform work due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2021

    Mr. Wittman (for himself and Mr. Ruppersberger) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the authority for agencies to reimburse paid leave provided 
by Federal contractors to certain employees or subcontractors unable to 
               perform work due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF REIMBURSEMENT AUTHORITY FOR FEDERAL 
              CONTRACTORS.

    Section 3610 of the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136; 134 Stat. 414) 
is amended by striking ``September 30, 2020'' and inserting ``September 
30, 2021''.
                                 <all>
```
AMENDMENT
#1


TO
THE EQUITY AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment No. 1, dated January 4, 2018 (this “Amendment”), is by and between Blink Charging Co., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”) and Michael D. Farkas (“Farkas”) (referred to collectively herein as the
“Parties”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and Farkas entered into an Equity Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of December 6, 2017. All
capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given such terms in the Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the Company and Farkas agree as follows:


 


1.
Extension of Expiration of this Agreement. The sentence in the Agreement that commences with “If the Offering does
not close by 5:00 PM Eastern Standard Time...” shall be amended and replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


“If
the Offering does not close by 5:00 PM Eastern Standard Time on February 14, 2018, this Agreement shall expire.”


 


ALL
OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE AGREEMENT REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.


 


Please
indicate acceptance and approval of this Amendment by signing below:


 


	BLNK HOLDINGS CO.	 	MICHAEL D. FARKAS
	 /s/ Michael J. Calise 	 	 /s/ Michael D. Farkas 
	Michael
J. Calise, Chief Executive Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

DARREL HAYES, )

)

Petitioner, ) C. C. A. NO. W1999-01850-CCA-R3-CO

)

 vs. ) LAKE COUNTY

)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) No. 99-7900

)

Respondent. )

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon motion of the state to affirm the

judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. 

This case represents an appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s petition

for a writ of habeas corpus. In May 1987, the petitioner was indicted on five counts of

aggravated rape and two counts of aggravated sexual battery. The record reflects that

he was found guilty by a jury in January 1988 on three counts of aggravated sexual

battery and one count of aggravated rape, and received an effective forty-five year

sentence. In his present petition, the petitioner claims 1) that the state should have

been required to elect the particular offense on which it would rely for convictions and 2)

that the trial court should have instructed the jury to decide upon the particular offenses

of which the petitioner was guilty. The trial court dismissed the petition finding that

these claims not proper subject for habeas corpus relief.

Habeas corpus relief is available in Tennessee only when “it

appears upon the face of the judgment or the record of the

proceedings upon which the judgment is rendered” that a

convicting court was without jurisdiction or authority to

sentence a defendant, or that a defendant’s sentence of

imprisonment or other restraint has expired.

Archer v. State, 851 S.W.2d 157, 164 (Tenn. 1993) (emphasis added). The record

before us reflects that the convicting court had jurisdiction over this petitioner and that

the petitioner’s sentence has not expired. However, even if the petitioner’s claims have

merit, such claims render the judgment voidable, not void, and it may not be collaterally

attacked in a suit for habeas corpus relief. Passarella v. State, 891 S.W.2d 619, 627

(Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). Moreover, when a petition for a writ of habeas corpus fails to

state a cognizable claim, the trial court may summarily dismiss the petition. See Id.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the state’s motion is granted and

FILED

January 12, 2000

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk
2

the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 20, Rules of the Court

of Criminal Appeals. Since the record reflects the petitioner is indigent, costs of this

proceeding shall be taxed to the state.

____________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE 

____________________________

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

____________________________

JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, JUDGE
Exhibit 10.1


 


WE 2014-1, LLC

1140 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10036


 


January 9, 2018


 


FlexShopper 2, LLC

2700 N. Military Trail, Suite 200

Boca Raton, FL 33431


 


Re: Notice to Extend Commitment Termination Date 


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


We refer to the Credit
Agreement (as amended from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), dated as of March 6, 2015, among FlexShopper
2, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as paying agent, the various lenders from time to time party thereto and WE 2014-1,
LLC, as administrative agent. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Credit Agreement.


 


Pursuant to the Credit
Agreement, the Administrative Agent and the Lender hereby notify the Company that the date in clause (i) of the definition of “Commitment
Termination Date” is hereby extended from April 1, 2018 to August 31, 2018.


 


Please acknowledge this letter by countersigning
under your name below.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




    	 	 	 



     


    

  


	 	WE 2014-1, LLC,
	 	as Administrative Agent and Lender
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Thomas Buttacavoli
	 	Name:	Thomas Buttacavoli
	 	Title:	Manager


 


Acknowledged as of the date first above written:


 


	FLEXSHOPPER 2, LLC, 	 
	as a Company	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Brad Bernstein	 
	Name:	Brad Bernstein	 
	Title:	CEO
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

**FORM N-PX**

**ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF**

**DWS Equity Income Fund and DWS Enhanced S&P 500 Index Fund**

**Each a Series of DWS Value Equity Trust**

Investment Company Act file number  811-1444

DWS Value Equity Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

John Millette

Secretary

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA  02108-3106

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  617-295-1000

Date of fiscal year end:  02/28

DWS Enhanced S&P 500 Index Fund

Date of fiscal year end:  07/31

DWS Equity Income Fund

Date of reporting period:  7/1/07-6/30/08

Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28078]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Combined Arts Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Combined Arts Advisory Panel, Media Arts Section B (Creation & 
Presentation and Planning & Stabilization categories) to the National 
Council on the Arts will be held on November 12-14, 1997. The panel 
will meet from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. on November 12, from 9 a.m. to 5:30 
p.m. on November 13, and from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. on November 14 in Room 
730 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C., 20506. A portion of this meeting, from 4 p.m. to 5:30 
p.m. on Thursday, November 13, will be open to the public for a policy 
discussion of guidelines, planning, field needs and trends, and 
Leadership Initiatives.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. on 
November 12, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. on November 13, and from 9 a.m. to 3 
p.m. on November 14, are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, 
evaluation, and recommendation on applications for financial assistance 
under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 
1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the 
agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of March 31, 1997, these sessions will be closed to the public 
pursuant to subsection (c) (4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 
5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, 
TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C., 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: October 17, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-28078 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
#### MELTZER AND MATLOFF, etc., Appellants, v. HASKELL M. LIBERMAN, INC., Appellee.

No. 69-221.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 24, 1969.

Rehearing Denied May 28,1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal quashed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3745 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3745

  To extend reemployment services and eligibility assessments to all 
      claimants for unemployment benefits, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2024

    Mr. Coons (for himself, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Kaine, and Mr. Tillis) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend reemployment services and eligibility assessments to all 
      claimants for unemployment benefits, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Building on Reemployment 
Improvements to Deliver Good Employment for Workers Act'' or the 
``BRIDGE for Workers Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR REEMPLOYMENT SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 306(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 506(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``individuals referred to reemployment 
        services as described in section 303(j)'' and inserting 
        ``claimants for regular compensation, including claimants 
        referred to reemployment services as described in section 
        303(j),''; and
            (2) by striking ``such individuals'' and inserting ``such 
        claimants''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Duane DALEY and Dorothy Daley, husband and wife, Appellants, v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY CO., a corporation, and Orange Grove Park Condominium, Inc., a corporation, Appellees.

No. 77-1347.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 27, 1978.

John B. Cechman of Goldberg, Rubinstein & Buckley, P. A., Fort Myers, for appellants.

Kim P. Hart of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, Fort Myers, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. See *Wills v. Sears Roebuck and Company,*351 So.2d 29 (Fla.1977) and *916*Graff v. McNeil,*322 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
#### Ramona J. GENTRY, Appellant, v. Billy W. GENTRY, Appellee.

No. 69-518.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 13, 1970.

William S. Blalock, Orlando, for appellant.

Palmer W. Collins, of Collins & Clark, Indian Harbour Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The husband was granted a divorce and the wife challenges primarily the sufficiency of the evidence in support of the final judgment. We have examined the record and considered the briefs and argument of counsel. Based thereon we are satisfied that no error has been made to appear and that the judgment is adequately supported by the proofs.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

CROSS, C. J., dissents, without opinion.
```

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.5

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                        OF ALPHA HOSPITALITY CORPORATION

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PURSUANT TO SECTION 242 OF THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ALPHA HOSPITALITY CORPORATION, (the "Corporation"),  a corporation organized and
existing  under and by  virtue  of the  Delaware  General  Corporation  Law (the
"DGCL"), does hereby certify as follows:

FIRST: By unanimous  written consent,  the Board of Directors of the Corporation
adopted  resolutions  setting  forth a proposed  amendment to the  Corporation's
Certificate  of  Incorporation,  declaring  such  amendment to be advisable  and
calling a meeting  of the  stockholders  of the  Corporation  for  consideration
thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

            RESOLVED, that immediately following the close of business
            on June 26,  2001,  a reverse  stock  split (the  "Reverse
            Stock Split") of the Corporation's common stock, (the "Old
            Common Stock") par value $.01 per share,  shall take place
            without  any  further  action  on the part of the  holders
            thereof,  whereby each ten (10) shares of Old Common Stock
            shall be  combined  into one validly  issued  share of new
            common  stock (the "New Common  Stock"),  the par value of
            which shall remain  unchanged.  Fractional  shares will be
            rounded up to the nearest whole number.

SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation,  an annual meeting of the  stockholder of the  Corporation was duly
called and held,  upon notice in  accordance  with  Section 222 of the DGCL,  at
which meeting the  necessary  number of votes as required by statute was cast in
favor of the amendment.

THIRD: That this Amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 2.42 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Amendment
of the  Certificate of  Incorporation  on the 13th day of June, 2001 and affirms
that the statements contained herein are true under the penalty of perjury.

                                             ALPHA HOSPITALITY CORPORATION

                                             By:  /s/ Stanley S. Tollman
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                      Stanley S. Tollman
                                                      Chairman and President

ATTEST:

By:  /s/ Thomas W. Aro
     --------------------
     Thomas W. Aro
     Secretary
```
Exhibit (a)(8)

**DWS ALLOCATION SERIES**

 

Certificate of Amendment of Declaration of Trust

 

The undersigned, being at least a majority of the duly elected and qualified Trustees of DWS Allocation Series, a Massachusetts business trust (the “Trust”), acting pursuant to the authority granted to the Board of Trustees in the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust dated July 14, 2006 (the “Declaration of Trust”), do hereby amend Article I Section 1 of the Declaration of Trust, as follows: 

 

The name of the Trust is hereby changed from “DWS Allocation Series” to “DWS Target Date Series” effective November 1, 2007. 

 

|   | IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have this day signed this Instrument. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Henry P. Becton, Jr.        |   | /s/ Dawn-Marie Driscoll         |
|---------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
| Henry P. Becton, Jr., Trustee   |   | Dawn-Marie Driscoll, Trustee    |
| /s/ Keith R. Fox                |   | /s/ Kenneth C. Froewiss         |
| Keith R. Fox, Trustee           |   | Kenneth C. Froewiss, Trustee    |
| /s/ Martin J. Gruber            |   | /s/ Richard J. Herring          |
| Martin J. Gruber, Trustee       |   | Richard J. Herring, Trustee     |
| /s/ Graham E. Jones             |   | /s/ Rebecca W. Rimel            |
| Graham E. Jones, Trustee        |   | Rebecca W. Rimel, Trustee       |
| /s/ Philip Saunders Jr.         |   | /s/ Axel Schwarzer              |
| Philip Saunders Jr., Trustee    |   | Axel Schwarzer, Trustee         |
| /s/ William N. Searcy, Jr.      |   | /s/ Jean Gleason Stromberg      |
| William N. Searcy, Jr., Trustee |   | Jean Gleason Stromberg, Trustee |
|                            |   |                            |
| Carl W. Vogt, Trustee           |   |                            |

 

 

Dated as of October 19, 2007
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.1


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
CINTAS CORPORATION
2016 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


Cintas Corporation (the “Company”) hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Cintas Corporation 2016 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of October 17, 2017 (the “Amendment Effective Date”).  This Amendment will be effective as described herein.


WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Company to amend the Plan, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date, to modify the definition of “Retirement” therein; and


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may amend the Plan for this purpose pursuant to Section 19 of the Plan without obtaining the approval of the Company’s shareholders or Plan participants.


NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date, the Board hereby amends the Plan as follows:


I.


Section 2(ll) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


“ ‘Retirement’ means, except as may otherwise be specified by the Committee with respect to an award, (i) in the case of an employee, termination of employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries, other than a termination due to Detrimental Activity, and other than by death or Disability, by an employee who has attained any of (A) at least 60 years of age with at least 12 years of continuous employment with the Company or a Subsidiary, (B) at least 61 years of age with at least 11 years of continuous employment with the Company or a Subsidiary, (C) at least 62 years of age with at least 10 years of continuous employment with the Company or a Subsidiary, (D) at least 63 years of age with at least 9 years of continuous employment with the Company or a Subsidiary, (E) at least 64 years of age with at least 8 years of continuous employment with the Company or a Subsidiary, or (F) at least 65 years of age or older with at least 7 years of continuous employment with the Company or a Subsidiary, and (ii) in the case of a non-employee Director, termination of service on the Board at such time and in such circumstances as is determined by the Board to constitute Board-approved retirement.”


II.


Except as amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Plan.
















































NAI-1503088634v5