alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
E1 

Employee ID

Cash Salary 

(Rate going 

forward.)

Stock Salary 

(Performance based: 

The stock vests at grant 

and is redeemable in 

three equal, annual 

installments beginning on 

the 2nd anniversary of 

grant.)

Long-Term Restricted Stock 

(Performance based: Awarded 

based on achievement of 

objective performance goals. 

Vests after 3 years of service. 

Transferability dependent on 

TARP repayment.) 

Total Direct 

Compensation 

(Cash salary paid to 

date plus two months at 

new run rate + stock 

salary + long-term 

restricted stock.)

$950,000 $2,421,667 $1,815,000 $5,445,000

$400,000 $88,317 $233,408 $700,225

$450,000 $137,717 $224,908 $674,725

$353,333 $11,567 $172,533 $517,600

$750,000 $436,467 $493,858 $1,481,575

$276,667 $96,041 $183,021 $549,062

$500,000 $316,222 $426,994 $1,280,883

$433,333 $312,894 $314,342 $943,025

$500,000 $576,667 $630,000 $1,881,000

$443,333 $194,594 $241,475 $724,425

$326,667 $123,091 $190,296 $570,887

$313,333 $131,357 $181,928 $545,785

$233,333 $61,967 $145,733 $437,200

$500,000 $353,300 $365,158 $1,095,475

$426,667 $186,817 $277,658 $832,975

$500,000 $279,778 $353,889 $1,061,667

$306,667 $79,517 $173,008 $519,025

$294,500 $38,967 $166,733 $500,200

$276,667 $187,250 $204,875 $614,625

$500,000 $409,222 $526,319 $1,578,958

2008

2007

Cash decreased by $3.9M or 31.0%

Total Direct Compensation decreased by $5.6M or 24.7%

Cash decreased by $7.4M or 46.0%

Total Direct Compensation decreased by $4.4M or 16.9%

Note: 1: Amounts reflected in this Exhibit do not include amounts the Company has asserted to be payable pursuant to legally 

binding rights under valid employment contracts, see 31 C.F.R. § 30.10(e)(2).

Note: 2: The total number of Covered Employees may be less than 25 because of terminations, departures and retirements 

after January 1, 2009.

EXHIBIT I

COVERED EMPLOYEES

2009 Compensation

Company Name: General Motors Company

Comparison of 2009 Compensation to Prior Years: 2007 & 2008 Compensation
Source Categories

Emissions 

(tons/yr) %

Cumulative 

%

Chemical Preparations 8.45E-01 1.05 1.05

Commercial Physical Research 4.00E-03 0.00 1.06

Hydrochloric Acid Production 3.18E-01 0.40 1.45

Industrial Organic Chemical Manufacturing 6.26E+00 7.79 9.25

Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (MON) 8.58E+00 10.68 19.92

Motors and Generators Manufacturing 1.25E-01 0.16 20.08

Petroleum Refining (not subject to MACT) 1.60E+00 1.99 22.07

Plastics Materials and Resins Manufacturing [1] 1.36E+01 16.94 39.00

Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) 1.27E+00 1.58 40.58

Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production 2.40E-03 0.00 40.58

Reinforced Plastic Composites Production 1.89E-01 0.24 40.82

Secondary Lead Smelting 3.26E+01 40.56 81.38

Synthetic Rubber Manufacturing [2] 1.47E+01 18.25 99.63

Tire Manufacturing 4.52E-02 0.06 99.69

Wet Corn Milling 2.50E-01 0.31 100.00

Total Emissions 80.33 100.00

Foot Notes

[1] Plastics Materials and Resins Manufacturing (Nov. 2002 

Inventory) was titled Polymers and Resins (I,II,IV) in the May 

1999 Report

[2] Synthetic Rubber Manufacturing was included with Polymers 

and Resins in the May 1999 Report

1,3-Butadiene
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29359]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Name of SEP: Phase II Clinical Trails of New Chemopreventive 
Agents.
    Date: November 18, 1997.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to adjournment.
    Place: Double Tree Hotel-Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Wilna Woods, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Executive Plaza 
North, Room 622B, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7405, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7405, Telephone: 301/496-7903.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review, discuss and evaluate responses to 
Request for Proposal.

    Name of SEP: Phase I Clinical Studies of Chemopreventive Agents.
    Date: November 29-20, 1997.
    Time: November 19-9:00 a.m. to recess; November 20-9:00 a.m. to 
adjournment.
    Place: Double Tree Hotel-Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Wilna Woods, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Executive Plaza 
North, Room 622B, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7405, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7405, Telephone: 301/496-7903.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review, discuss and evaluate responses to 
Request for Proposal.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set for in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.393, 
Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and 
Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, 
Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, 
Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control)

    Dated: October 30, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-29359 Filed 11-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 24, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60342 Summary Calendar

HATEM SULIEMAN NASER, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A78 177 272

-------------------- Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hatem Naser petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA’s) decision finding him inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(i), (ii) and, therefore, statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status and removable. He has also moved to expedite our ruling on that petition. Naser argues that his checking the “citizen or national” box on two I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification forms for the purpose of securing private employment was an insufficient basis on which to find him inadmissible. He further argues that the BIA’s decisionNo. 04-60342 -2- to utilize its summary affirmance procedures was inappropriate in his case. Substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s determination that Naser had not borne his burden of showing that he was “clearly and beyond doubt” not inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii). See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996); 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(2)(A). The issue whether Naser is inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(i) is pretermitted in light of the determination that substantial evidence supported the finding that he was inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii). Finally, we reject Naser’s argument that we must review the BIA’s use of its streamlined review process. See Garcia-Melendez v. Ashcroft , 351 F.3d 657, 662 (5th Cir. 2003).
PETITION AND MOTION TO EXPEDITE DENIED.
#### Guy G. CARMICHAEL, Jr., et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF CORAL GABLES, Florida, a municipal corporation; and Rebyl Zain, as City Commissioners of the City of Coral Gables, Respondents.

No. 41988.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 18, 1972.

George N. Jahn, Miami, Frank W. Guil-ford, Jr., Coral Gables, and Marion E. Sib-ley, of Sibley, Giblin, Levenson & Ward, Miami Beach, for petitioners.

Charles H. Spooner, Robert D. Zahner, Coral Gables, Adams, George & Wood, and William S. Frates, and Bertha Claire Lee, of Frates, Floyd, Pearson & Stewart, Miami, for respondents.

PER CURIAM,

The petition for writ of certiorari re-fleeted apparent jurisdiction in this Court. *2We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and DREW, J. (Retired), concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1660 

To make certain municipalities eligible for grants under the Federal Water 

Pollution Control Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2021 

Mrs. TRAHAN (for herself, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. PAPPAS, and 

Ms. KUSTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To make certain municipalities eligible for grants under the 

Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Sewage Overflow 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SEWER OVERFLOW AND STORMWATER REUSE MU7 NICIPAL GRANTS. 

8 Section 221 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

9 Act (33 U.S.C. 1301) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (b)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1660 IH

1 (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘or’’; 

2 (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the pe3 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

4 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(5) is a municipality with high levels of sewage 

6 in the rivers, lakes, and bays of such municipality.’’; 

7 (2) in subsection (d)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘The Federal share’’ and 

9 inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘(1) FEDERAL SHARE.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

12 subparagraph (B), the Federal share’’; and 

13 (B) by striking ‘‘The non-Federal share’’ 

14 and inserting the following: 

15 ‘‘(B) FINANCIALLY DISTRESSED COMMU16 NITIES.—The Federal share of the cost of ac17 tivities carried out using amounts from a grant 

18 made to a financially distressed community 

19 under subsection (a) shall be not less than 75 

20 percent of the cost. 

21 ‘‘(2) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—The non-Federal 

22 share’’; and 

23 (3) in subsection (f)— 

24 (A) in paragraph (1)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1660 IH

1 (i) by striking ‘‘$225,000,000’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘$500,000,000’’; and 

3 (ii) by striking ‘‘2020’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘2030’’; and 

5 (B) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘20 per6 cent’’ and inserting ‘‘25 percent’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Oscar PEDRAJA, a widower, Appellant, v. PRICHER TRUCK SERVICE, INC., a Florida corporation, and John Howard Laskoske, Appellees.

No. 71-631.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 14, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS High Income Trust, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| July 30, 2008 | /s/Michael G. Clark   |
|---------------|-----------------------|
|          | Michael G. Clark      |
|          | President             |
|          | DWS High Income Trust |

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS High Income Trust, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| July 30, 2008 | /s/Paul Schubert                      |
|---------------|---------------------------------------|
|          | Paul Schubert                         |
|          | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|          | DWS High Income Trust                 |
Exhibit 32.01




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO




SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, Jon C. Sundt, the Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of Altegris Portfolio Management, Inc. (d/b/a Altegris Funds), the General Partner of Altegris QIM Futures Fund, L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Partnership on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




Date: March 31, 2011




/s/ Jon C. Sundt


Jon C. Sundt


Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer


Altegris Portfolio Management, Inc. (d/b/a Altegris Funds)


General Partner of Altegris QIM Futures Fund, L.P.
#### F & B CECO, INC. v. GALAXY STUDIOS, INC.

No. 38183.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 216 So.2d 75.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



Jacob Elhadad the Chief Executive
Officer,  and Director of Medisafe 1 Technologies Corp, certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the
Registrant.



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|Date: October 29, 2012 | Medisafe 1 Technologies Corp                
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                       |                                             
|                       | By:                                         
|                       | Name: Jacob Elhadad                         
|                       | Title: Chief Executive Officer, and Director



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner, v. Edmund Carl MAJOR, Respondent.

No. 42448.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Norman A. Faulkner, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar, petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

A petition of The Florida Bar makes known to us that Edmund Carl Major, a member of The Florida Bar, was committed to the Department of Mental Health, State of Michigan, for treatment of insanity in an appropriate hospital of the State of Michigan. A copy of the order of committal entered on April 21, 1972, at Grand Rapids, Michigan, by the Honorable Stuart Hoffius, Circuit Judge of the Seventh Judicial Circuit, County of Kent, State of Michigan, Is attached to The Florida Bar’s petition.

Copies of the Bar’s petition were forwarded to Edmund Carl Major, at his address of record for The Florida Bar at 1202 Walsh Drive, Coral Gables, Florida, and to Dr. Ames Robey, Director, Center for Forensic Psychiatry, Box 2060, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106, where Mr. Major is receiving treatment, by certified mail on June 7, 1972.

*8No response to the forwarded copies of the petition has been received by The Florida Bar from Mr. Major or anyone in his behalf.

It is therefore ordered that the petition of The Florida Bar to suspend Edmund Carl Major from the practice of law because he has been committed for treatment of insanity as related is hereby granted, subject to any rights he may have under due process and to apply for reinstatement at the proper time and upon proper showing.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         528,431
<SECURITIES>                                   2,446,786
<RECEIVABLES>                                  90,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,304,538
<PP&E>                                         4,614,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,946,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          153,765
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,806,763
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,986,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,946,738
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               98,781
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  704,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (605,459)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (605,459)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (605,459)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
#### The PILLSBURY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. CHERNIN & PILA DAIRY & LIVESTOCK CO., INC., Respondent.

No. 44293.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 22, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 280 So.2d 49.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59712-59713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29055]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Proposed Collection Application/Permit for Use of Space in Public 
Buildings and Grounds

AGENCY: Office of Equal Employment Opportunity, GSA.

ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding an extension to 
an existing OMB clearance (3090-0044).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The GSA hereby gives notice under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 that it is requesting the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
to reinstate information collection, 3090-0044, ``Application/Permit 
for Use of Space in Public Buildings and Grounds.'' This GSA Form is 
used by the general public to request the use of public space in 
Federal buildings for cultural, recreational or educational activities. 
A copy, sample, or description of any material or item proposed for 
distribution or display must also accompany the request.

DATES: January 5, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Edward Springer, GSA Desk Officer, Room 
3235, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and to Marjorie Ashby, General 
Services Administration (MVP), 18th & F Streets, NW, Washington, DC 
20405.

ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN: Respondents: 8000; annual responses: 1; 
average hours per response: 0.05; burden hours: 666.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charlene Heeter, Public Building 
Service (202) 208-0214.

COPY OF PROPOSAL: A copy of this proposal may be obtained from the GSA 
Acquisition Policy Division (MVP),

[[Page 59713]]

Room 4011, GSA Building, 18th and F Streets NW, Washington, DC 20405, 
or by telephone (202) 501-3822, or by faxing your request to (202) 501-
3341.


    Dated: October 28, 1997.
Ida M. Ustad,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 97-29055 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-M