alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QUICK

CARD

Pest control pyrotechnics are specialized explosive

devices used to disperse nuisance wild animals

without injuring them. Common types include

screamer siren or bird banger cartridges fired

from a launch pistol and shellcrackers fired from

a 12-gauge break-action shotgun. All of these contain high explosives and must be handled with

extreme care to prevent injury or damage to property.

All pyrotechnics, including those with fuses, are regulated by state and local laws and by stringent federal

controls.

General Safety Precautions

• Notify law enforcement agencies prior to shooting.

• Always use eye and hearing protection.

• Keep the muzzle of the launch pistol pointed in

a safe direction, away from any people.

• Shoot away from any buildings, vehicles and

dry vegetation. 

• Ensure immediate access to a class ABC fire

extinguisher.

• Keep spare cartridges covered and away from the

launch pistol.

• Never shoot from the inside of a vehicle or carry

a loaded launch pistol in a vehicle.

• Consider wind direction and overhead obstructions.

Storage

• Store pyrotechnics to prevent access to them by

children or unauthorized persons. 

• Store devices in original packaging and inside a

locked metal container with a non-sparking interior.

• Keep devices in a cool, dry, non-residential location.

Protect Yourself

Pest Control

Pyrotechnics

TM
Loading and Using a Launch Pistol

• Cock the hammer.

• Insert a blank cap under the spring clip.

• Place your thumb between the cap and hammer

to prevent accidental discharge.

• Point the muzzle in a safe direction and insert a

pyrotechnic cartridge fully into the barrel; insert

the hollow end of the screamer siren or the

exposed black powder end of the bird banger

cartridge first. 

• Hold the launch pistol at arm’s length and elevate

it toward the target at a 45 degree angle or

greater.

• Remove your thumb, look away from the pistol,

and pull the trigger. 

Using Shotgun Shellcrackers 

• Use a 12-gauge break-action, breech-loading

shotgun. 

• Inspect the gun’s barrel for blockage from the

breech end after every shot. 

• Never look directly into the gun’s muzzle.

• An open or improved cylinder barrel is recommended. 

• Bore brush the gun’s barrel after every 5th shot. 

• If a shellcracker fails to explode when fired, keep

the muzzle pointed in a safe direction for at least

one minute, and then unload.

OSHA 3313-02N-07

For more complete information:

Occupational Safety 

and Health Administration

U.S. Department of Labor

www.osha.gov 

(800) 321-OSHA

United States 

Department of 

Agriculture

Animal and 

Plant Health 

Inspection 

Service

Wildlife 

Services

www.aphis.usda.gov/ws 

(866) 4-USDA-WS
From: Erick Martinez

To: Bryant, Matthew (FAA)

Cc: Thomas, Richard R (FAA)

Subject: RE: EC 120 electrical compressor

Date: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:17:58 AM

Hi Matt,

Confirmed, implementing Project# SA6711DE-R will restore the tail rotor coupling to OEM.

Thanks,

Erick

From: Matthew.Bryant@faa.gov [mailto:Matthew.Bryant@faa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 8:43 AM

To: Erick Martinez

Cc: Richard.R.Thomas@faa.gov

Subject: RE: EC 120 electrical compressor

Erik,

Could you verify that with me. Rich is working with the FAA Directorate on the NPRM version of

the AD and they need to know the answer for sure.

Matthew Bryant

FAA Aviation Safety Engineer (ASE)

Electrical & Mechanical Systems

26805 East 68th Avenue, Room 214

Denver, Co 80249

T: (303) 342-1092

F: (303) 342-1088

E: Matthew.Bryant@faa.gov

From: Erick Martinez [mailto:emartinez@aircommcorp.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 8:07 AM

To: Bryant, Matthew (FAA)

Cc: Thomas, Richard R (FAA); Luke Bokas

Subject: RE: EC 120 electrical compressor

Hi Matt,

Yes I believe that is correct, Project# SA6711DE-R would restore the tail rotor coupling to the OEM.

Thanks,

Erick

From: Matthew.Bryant@faa.gov [mailto:Matthew.Bryant@faa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 2:50 PM

To: Jim Byrnes; Erick Martinez

Cc: Richard.R.Thomas@faa.gov
Subject: EC 120 electrical compressor

Jim and Erik,

Richard ask me a question which I am pretty sure what the answer is, but will ask it anyway. The

intention of the EC120 electrical compressor change would also be to remove the Air tail rotor

drive shaft coupling/ pulley and replace it with the OEM coupling correct (ie go back to the OEM

original design)?\

If you could respond back ASAP, Rich is in need of a quick response. Thanks

Matthew Bryant

FAA Aviation Safety Engineer (ASE)

Electrical & Mechanical Systems

26805 East 68th Avenue, Room 214

Denver, Co 80249

T: (303) 342-1092

F: (303) 342-1088

E: Matthew.Bryant@faa.gov
# Strategic Plans and Reports

                        -  NCCIH Strategic Plan FY 2021⁠–⁠2025: Mapping a Pathway to Research on Whole Person Health 

## Past Strategic Plans

                        - 2016 Strategic Plan: Exploring the Science of Complementary and Integrative Health
                        - Exploring the Science of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Third Strategic Plan 2011–2015  (1.6MB PDF)  
                        - Expanding Horizons of Health Care: Strategic Plan 2005–2009  (10MB PDF)
                        - Expanding Horizons of Healthcare: Five-Year Strategic Plan, 2001–2005  (1.5MB PDF) 

## Reports

                      - National Advisory Council for Complementary and Integrative Health (NACCIH) Working Group Report on Clinician-Scientist Workforce Development  (1.01MB PDF)
                      - Enhancing Well-Being Measurement in Health Research, Clinical Care, and Population Health Promotion  (2.92 MB PDF)
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-1018.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Supplementary Treaty to the 

 Treaty of October 14, 2003 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and GERMANY 

Signed at Washington April 18, 2006 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 GERMANY 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Supplementary treaty to the treaty of October 14, 2003. 

Signed at Washington April 18, 2006; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-13, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-13, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Diplomatic Notes at Washington 

 March 11, 2008 and September 18, 2009; 

Entered into force October 18, 2009.
#### Ex parte Richard Lee JAMES.

77-439.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 26, 1978.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.
From: Ed Milliken [mailto:emilliken@bowerstonshale.com]

Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 2:46 PM

To: Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>

Subject: RE: Bowerston green brick testing results

These samples were from two plants, so I adjusted the spreadsheet to reflect that. Each test 

was from a shale pit near each plant location that we have been mining for decades and intend 

to mine for decades longer. I hope this answers your questions.

Ed Milliken

President & CEO, The Bowerston Shale Company | 515 Main Street | PO Box 199 | Bowerston, 

OH 44695| Phone: 740-269-2921 | Fax: 740-269-5456 | mailto:emilliken@bowerstonshale.com

| The Bowerston Shale Company | Brick & Pavers

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the 

intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, 

copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received 

this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your 

cooperation

<<Copy of Green Brick Testing Results- 032515BIA- to EPA May 4 2015_Bowerston (2).xlsx>>

<<The Bowerston Shale Co. Hg Results Sept 2014.pdf>>

From: Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>

Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 10:41 AM

To: 'emilliken@bowerstonshale.com' <emilliken@bowerstonshale.com>

Subject: Bowerston green brick testing results

Hello Mr. Milliken,

I work with RTI International, the contractor working with the U.S. EPA in developing air 

regulations for the Brick industry, I got your name and contact information from Susan Miller of 

the BIA. The BIA has provided EPA with a spreadsheet of mercury green brick testing results 

with the intent to add a mercury raw material variability factor to the Mercury MACT floor limit. In 

order to incorporate this raw material data, EPA needs to know a little bit more about the 

general location of the clay deposits being used by the facilities.

I’m attaching a spreadsheet of the Bowerston facilities that provided green brick testing results 

to EPA via BIA. I’ve added some columns at the end to be filled out with the Name of Clay 

Deposit, Geological Age of the Deposit, and Latitude/Longitude of the Clay Deposit. Any 

information you are able to provide about the clay deposits will be much appreciated and 

helpful!

Thank you for your help,

Gabrielle 
Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-7015

<< Green Brick Testing Results- 032515BIA- to EPA May 4 2015_Bowerston.xlsx>>
Exhibit 10.1


 


PNC BANK 


 


January 5, 2018


 


NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


PO BOX 69


CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014-0069


 


		Re:	Renewal of Expiration Date for
                                         that certain $3,000,000.00 Committed Line of Credit ("Line of Credit")
                                         extended by PNC Bank, National Association (the "Bank") to NORTHERN
                                         TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (the "Borrower")



 


Ladies/Gentlemen:


 


We are pleased to
inform you that the Line of Credit has been renewed. The Expiration Date of the Line of Credit, as set forth in that certain promissory
note executed and delivered by the Borrower to the Bank dated December 14, 2006 (the "Note") and/or that certain
loan agreement governing the Line of Credit (the "Loan Agreement"), has been extended from January 07, 2018 to
January 7, 2019, or such later date as may, in the Bank's sole discretion, be designated by the Bank by written notice from the
Bank to the Borrower, effective on January 08, 2018. All sums due under the Note, the Loan Agreement or any related documents,
instruments and agreements (collectively as amended from time to time, the "Loan Documents") shall be due and
payable on the Expiration Date, as extended hereby. All other terms and conditions of the Loan Documents governing the Line of
Credit remain in full force and effect.


 


It has been a pleasure
working with you and I look forward to a continued successful relationship. Thank you again for your business.


 


Very truly yours,


 


PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


 


 


 


	By:		/s/ Yelena Spadafora
	 	 	Yelena Spadafora
	 	 	Vice President
#### Michael J. PARIS, Appellant, v. Kanella PARIS, Appellee.

No. 69-651.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 3, 1970.

Rehearing, Denied March 30, 1970.

Horton & Schwartz and Tsamoutales, Wolfson & Appel, Miami, for appellant.

Charles P. Leventhal, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Anders v. Anders, 153 Fla. 54, 13 So.2d 603 (1943); Stone v. Stone, Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 301; Poland v. Poland, Fla.App.1959, 112 So.2d 588; and Perry v. Perry, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 152.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Corrpro Companies, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-58376) on Form S-8 of Corrpro Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries (Company) of
our report dated June 29, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Corrpro Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2005, which
report appears in the March 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Corrpro
Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries.

Our report refers to changes in the methods of accounting in fiscal 2003 for
goodwill and other intangible assets.

/s/ KPMG LLP

June 30, 2005
Cleveland, Ohio
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2362
JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES LEWIS KING, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 00-7610
JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES LEWIS KING, Defendant - Appellee.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge; Albert V. Bryan, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1532, CA-98- 1368-A) Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 27, 20012 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Lewis King, Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Joseph Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his post-judgment motions filed in his civil actions. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals as frivolous on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. King , Nos. CA97-1532; CA-98-1368-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2000; Oct. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### W. H. NEWTON, d/b/a Newton Insurance Agency v. Spencer P. WALTON et al.

No. 47211.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 24, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 15, 1973.

Simrall, Aultman & Pope, Hattiesburg', for appellant.

Herbert J. Stelly, Sr., Gulfport, for ap-pellees.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and INZER, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ-

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison County; Leslie B. Grant, Judge.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0637

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

WALTER JASON PURKHISER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 27, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 20 2023

10/20/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0637
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29911]



[[Page 61129]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE


Advisory Council on Government Auditing Standards; Notice of 
Meeting

    The Advisory Council on Government Auditing Standards will meet on 
Monday, November 24, 1997, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and Tuesday, 
November 25, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., in room 7C13 of the 
General Accounting Office building, 441 G St., NW., Washington, D.C.
    The Advisory Council on Government Auditing Standards will hold a 
meeting to discuss issues that may impact Government Auditing 
Standards. Any interested person may attend the meeting as an observer. 
Council discussions and reviews are open to the public.
    For further information contact: Marcia Buchanan, Assistant 
Director, Government Auditing Standards, AIMD, (202) 512-9321.

    Dated: November 7, 1997.
Marcia B. Buchanan,
Assistant Director.
[FR Doc. 97-29911 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-06071 |
|------------------------------------|-----------|

 

DWS Institutional Funds

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

One South Street

Baltimore, MD  21202

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 12/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 12/31/07 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

 

DECEMBER 31, 2007

Annual Report
PO Box 51 02/18/2016 Tom Woodward Sky Aviation Corporation 1444Airport Rd Worland Wy, 82401 Worland WY 82401

United States ofAmerica Department OfTransportation Federal Aviation Administration To Whom It May Concern; (307}347-6138 Fax {307)347-6130

On August 11, 2015, Sky Aviation was granted Exemption No. 12449. This exemption allows fortraining activities with our Restricted Category CH-46E helicopterwith the tail number461WY. Since that time, we have added another helicopterto ourType Certificate R0013DE. We would like to request a modification to our Exemption to add tail number462WY which is on the Type Certificate. We do not wish any other changes to the exemption. Thank you foryour consideration. Sincerely,

Tom Woodward President, Sky Aviation
SO2 COS by Month

Process Data Units January February March Quarterly April May June Quarterly July August September Quarterly October November December Quarterly YTD

Aluminum Production lbs 24,293,496 21,655,314 24,540,201 70,489,011 23,143,004 24,460,906 23,683,539 71,287,449 24,076,968 23,526,290 23,249,329 70,852,587 24,705,960 24,106,433 24,807,396 73,619,789 286,248,836

Aluminum Production tons 12,147 10,828 12,270 35,245 11,572 12,230 11,842 35,644 12,038 11,763 11,625 35,426 12,353 12,053 12,404 36,810 143,124

Green Anode Production MT 5,669 5,991 7,516 19,176 6,056 6,222 7,163 19,441 4,744 6,859 6,973 18,576 5,756 6,324 6,477 18,557 75,750

Green Anode Production tons 6,249 6,604 8,285 21,138 6,676 6,859 7,896 21,430 5,229 7,561 7,686 20,477 6,345 6,971 7,140 20,456 83,500

Baked Anode Production MT 5,849 5,596 6,186 17,631 6,404 6,630 6,322 19,356 5,962 5,921 6,225 18,108 6,258 5,679 5,977 17,914 73,009

Baked Anode Production tons 6,447 6,169 6,819 19,435 7,059 7,308 6,969 21,336 6,572 6,527 6,862 19,961 6,898 6,260 6,589 19,747 80,479

%S in Baked Anodes % 1.95 1.84 2.15 2.19 2.18 2.17 2.20 2.23 2.21 2.22 2.20 2.18 2.14

%S in Reacted Aluminum % 0.441 0.365 0.382 0.371 0.374 0.338 0.410 0.366 0.396 0.379 0.417 0.426 0.389

Pots Operating No. 193.2 193.0 195.0 191.5 194.1 193.5 191.7 190.9 192.8 196.8 197.2 196.6 193.857

Net Carbon lb carbon/lb Al 0.421 0.413 0.403 0.409 0.416 0.424 0.412 0.425 0.419 0.417 0.413 0.413 0.415

Al2O3 Feed Rate ton/hr 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.000

% S converted to SO2 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908

% S converted to COS 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092

SO2 from carbon lb/ton 29.82 27.60 31.47 32.53 32.94 33.42 32.92 34.42 33.63 33.62 33.00 32.70 32.339

SO2 from Al2O3 lb/ton 1.080 0.906 0.927 0.923 0.910 0.822 0.981 0.926 0.981 0.913 0.996 1.022 0.949

Total SO2: lb/ton 30.90 28.51 32.40 33.46 33.85 34.24 33.90 35.35 34.61 34.54 34.00 33.72 33.288

98% through A-398's lb/yr 367,797 302,485 389,552 379,388 405,696 397,345 399,958 407,490 394,318 418,089 401,575 409,917 4,673,610

2% through monitor lb/yr 7,506 6,173 7,950 7,743 8,280 8,109 8,162 8,316 8,047 8,532 8,195 8,366 95,380

Total SO2: lb SO2 375,303 308,658 397,502 1,081,462 387,131 413,975 405,454 1,206,561 408,120 415,806 402,365 1,226,292 426,622 409,770 418,283 1,254,675 4,768,990

Total COS: lb/ton 2.83 2.62 2.99 3.09 3.13 3.17 3.13 3.27 3.19 3.19 3.13 3.11 37

98% through A-398's lb/yr 33,715 27,819 35,945 35,043 37,501 36,837 36,892 37,693 36,394 38,664 37,027 37,757 431,288

2% through monitor lb/yr 688 568 734 715 765 752 753 769 743 789 756 771 8,802

Total COS: lb COS 34,403 28,387 36,678 35,758 38,266 37,589 37,645 38,462 37,137 39,453 37,783 38,528 440,090

Estimated as no data available.

2010 ALCOA MASSENA WEST PLANT - SULFUR DIOXIDE AND COS EMISSIONS BY MONTH

0900006480f6eb1d.xls 3:39 PM 11/17/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1649 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1649

 To make a technical correction to the ALS Disability Insurance Access 
                              Act of 2019.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2021

Mr. Moulton (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, and Mr. Crow) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make a technical correction to the ALS Disability Insurance Access 
                              Act of 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETROACTIVE ACCESS TO SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY BENEFITS 
              INDIVIDUALS WITH AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS (ALS).

    (a) In General.--Section 2(b) of the ALS Disability Insurance 
Access Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-250) is amended by striking 
``applications for disability insurance benefits filed after the date 
of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``applications for disability 
insurance benefits approved after the date that is 5 months before the 
date of enactment of this Act''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the ALS Disability Insurance 
Access Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-250).
                                 <all>
```