alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stanton W. MEAD and Mrs. Ray W. Heslop, Appellants, v. John MURRELL et al., Appellees.

No. 77-833.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 7, 1977.

Rehearing Granted Jan. 23, 1978.

Abbott, Frumkes & Alhadeff and Melvyn B. Frumkes, Miami Beach, for appellants.

Sibley, Giblin, Levenson *&*Glaser and Marion E. Sibley, Miami Beach, for appel-lees.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

ON REHEARING GRANTED

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s petition for rehearing is granted and the order appealed from reversed on the authority of *Ohio Casualty Group v. Parrish,*350 So.2d 466 (Fla.1977), quashing 338 So.2d 910 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). The cause is remanded for further proceedings, and the opinion filed October 11, 1977 is hereby vacated and withdrawn.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5655-5656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2979]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 72-9 (50-267)]


Notice of Issuance of Amendment to Materials License SNM-2504; 
Public Service Company of Colorado, Fort St. Vrain Independent Spent 
Fuel Storage Installation

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has issued 
Amendment 4 to Materials License No. SNM-2504 held by the Public 
Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) for the receipt, possession, 
storage, and transfer of spent fuel at the Fort St. Vrain (FSV) 
independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI), located in Weld 
County, Colorado. The amendment is effective as of the date of 
issuance.
    By application dated January 9, 1997, and supplement dated January 
17, 1997, PSCo requested an amendment to its ISFSI license to change 
the title of the corporate-level individual directly responsible for 
oversight of the ISFSI. PSCo requested that the position of ``Corporate 
Vice President'' responsible for the ISFSI, identified in Technical 
Specification 4.2, be modified to ``Corporate Executive'' responsible 
for the ISFSI.
    This amendment complies with the standards and requirements of the 
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's 
rules and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as 
required by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in 10 
CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the license amendment.
    In accordance with 10 CFR 72.46(b)(2), a determination has been 
made that the amendment does not present a genuine issue as to whether 
public health and safety will be significantly affected. Therefore, the 
publication of a notice of proposed action and an opportunity for 
hearing or a notice of hearing is not warranted. Notice is hereby given 
of the right of interested persons to request a hearing on whether the 
action should be rescinded or modified.
    The Commission has determined that the issuance of the amendment 
will not result in any significant environmental impact and that, 
pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10)(ii), an environmental assessment need 
not be prepared in connection with issuance of the amendment.
    Documents related to this action are available for public 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room located at the 
Gelman Building, 2120 L

[[Page 5656]]

Street, NW, Washington, DC 20555, and at the Local Public Document Room 
at the Weld Library District, Lincoln Park Branch, 919 7th Street, 
Greeley, Colorado 80631.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of January 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Charles J. Haughney,
Acting Director, Spent Fuel Project Office, Office of Nuclear Material 
Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 97-2979 Filed 2-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### James HUNDLEY, Appellant, v. MAGNUM MARINE DIVISION OF AMERICAN PHOTOCOPY EQUIPMENT COMPANY, an Illinois corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-923.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 12, 1970.

Arthur Roth, Miami, for appellant.

Preddy, Haddad, Kutner & Hardy, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in the trial court appeals an adverse summary judgment dismissing an action sounding in tort, which arose out of the alleged operation of a boat owned by the appellee. We reverse.

Upon determining a motion for summary judgment, all reasonable inferences from the evidence are resolved in favor of the party moved against. Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40; Whidden v. Morse, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 625; Sloane v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 451. Applying this test to the record at bar, it appears that there is a reasonable inference which could be considered by a jury as to whether or not the boat in question was being operated by agents or employees of the appellee at the time of the alleged accident, making the owner thereof liable pursuant to the provisions of § 371.-52, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. See also: Rountree v. A. P. Moller Steamship Company, Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 771.

Therefore, for the reasons above stated, the final judgment here under review is hereby reversed, with directions to submit the matter to a jury upon the issues as made by the pleadings.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.
#### Robert Gene DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1111.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### RESOLUTE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, for the Use and Benefit of DADE COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 73-702.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan


## July 31, 2006

130886

DIANE STESLICKI, Plaintiff,

v
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/ SC: 130886 AGC: 3008/05 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



## On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

p0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
July 31, 2006
Clerk
#### Raul P. ARREOLA, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Respondent.

No. 43688.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 7, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 275 So.2d 329.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
#### NATIONAL BANK OF MELBOURNE AND TRUST COMPANY, Executor of the Estates of Ralph E. Balch and Bess D. Balch, Deceased, Petitioner, v. Honorable Tom WADDELL, Jr., Judge of the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Respondent.

No. 69-100.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Aug. 1, 1969.

Mandamus denied.
SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES

                                 -----------------

                           DWS Core Plus Income Fund
                              DWS Global Bond Fund

Effective immediately,  Stephen Ilott will no longer serve as Co-Manager of each
of the above-listed funds. All references to Mr. Ilott are hereby deleted.






               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference


                                                          [DWS INVESTMENTS LOGO]
                                                             Deutsche Bank Group

August 18, 2008
DMF-3674
#### QUALITY ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC., Appellant, v. James L. SMITH and W. J. Nelson, Appellees.

No. S-390.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 27, 1973.

John F. Daniel, of Ellinor, Rish, Daniel & Mann, Panama City, for appellant.

John D. O’Brien, of Syfrett, Hutto & O’Brien, Panama City, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J, and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
#### Jim FAIR, Appellant, v. H. L. WIGGINS, Appellee.

No. 40346.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 17, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 23, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS, JJ., and CREWS, Circuit Judge, concur.
3rd Amend to Reg.'s Assoc. Stock Ownership Plan



 



Exhibit 10.12


Third Amendment

to the

Associate Stock Purchase Plan

(Amended and Restated

as of December 31,1997)



     RESOLVED, that the Associate Stock Ownership Plan (amended and restated as
of December 31, 1997), (the“Plan”) is hereby amended effective June 29, 2002 by
deleting the first and second sentences in Section 8 Termination or Amendment
of the Plan and replacing it with the following:


     The Plan shall automatically terminate on the date that the maximum number
of shares, as specified in Section 12 Maximum Number of
Shares of the Plan have
been issued. The Company, by action of the Board or the Committee, may
terminate the Plan at any time prior to the issuance of the maximum number of
shares authorized under the Plan, in which case notice of such termination
shall be given to all participants, but any failure to give such notice shall
not impair the effectiveness of the termination.
No. 9652.

#### The Lake Shore Electric Railway Co. et al. *v.*Cleverdon, Admx.

(Decided December 21, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

*Mr. Thomas H. Hogsett; Mr. M. B. Johnson*and *Mr. H. H.*Johnson, for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Willis Vickery*and *Messrs. Parkhurst &*Vickery, for defendant in error.

*619Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHARLES MICHAEL HENRY

, Appellant,

v.

CHEYENNE M. HENRY

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1789

[ November 9, 2017 ]

Appeal of non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Edward A. Garrison , Judge; L.T.

Case No. 2016DR006077

.

Charles Michael Henry, Lake Worth, pro se.

Scott M. Weiss of Weiner & Weiss, LLC, Boca Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., M AY and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibits 8.1.  List of significant subsidiaries of Pampa Energía S.A. 1) Generation Business Inversora Ingentis S.A. Inversora Nihuiles S.A. Inversora Diamante S.A. Inversora Piedra Buena S.A. Central Térmica Loma de la Lata S.A. Powerco S.A. Pampa Generación S.A. Hidroeléctrica Los Nihuiles S.A. Hidroeléctrica Diamante S.A. Central Térmica Piedra Buena S.A. Central Térmica Güemes S.A. Energía Distribuida S.A. 2) TransmissionBusiness Transelec Argentina S.A. Citelec S.A. Transener S.A. Transba S.A. 3) DistributionBusiness IEASA S.A. EASA S.A. Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte S.A. Emdersa Holding S.A.  Emdersa S.A. Empresa Distribuidora de Salta S.A. Empresa Distribuidora de La Rioja S.A. Empresa Distribuidora San Luis S.A. Emdersa Generación Salta S.A. Empresa de Sistemas Eléctricos Dispersos S.A. EDEN S.A.


---



4) OilBusiness Petrolera Pampa S.A. 5) GasBusiness EPCA S.A. Compañía de Inversiones de Energía S.A. TGS S.A. 6) Other Business Pampa Real Estate S.A. Bodega Loma de la Lata S.A.  All of the subsidiaries mentioned above have their jurisdiction of incorporation in the Republic of Argentina.


---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CFO CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd. (“Advantage”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Craig Blackwood, Vice
President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Advantage, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Advantage.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  March 3, 2016 | /s/ Craig Blackwood                               
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|                     | Craig Blackwood                                   
|                     | Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
# L_2006036EN.01004201.xml

| 8.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 36/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 36/42

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 30 January 2006

extending to the non-participating Member States the application of Decision 2006/75/EC amending and extending Decision 2001/923/EC establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the ‘Pericles’ programme)

(2006/76/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 308 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | When adopting Decision 2006/75/EC (2) the Council indicated that it should apply in the participating Member States as defined in the first indent of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro (3). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

When adopting Decision 2006/75/EC (2) the Council indicated that it should apply in the participating Member States as defined in the first indent of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro (3).

| (2) | However, the exchange of information and staff and the assistance and training measures implemented under the Pericles programme should be uniform throughout the Community and the requisite steps should therefore be taken to guarantee the same level of protection for the euro in the Member States where the euro is not their official currency, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

However, the exchange of information and staff and the assistance and training measures implemented under the Pericles programme should be uniform throughout the Community and the requisite steps should therefore be taken to guarantee the same level of protection for the euro in the Member States where the euro is not their official currency,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The application of Decision 2006/75/EC shall be extended to Member States other than the participating Member States as defined in the first indent of Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 974/98.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 January 2006.

For the Council

The President

U. PLASSNIK

---

(1)  Opinion delivered on 13 October 2005 (not yet published in the OJ).

1

(2)  See page 40 of this Official Journal.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 139, 11.5.1998, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2169/2005 (OJ L 346, 29.12.2005, p. 1).

3

---
Item 77M DWS Capital
Growth VIP (a series of
DWS Variable Series I)

Registrant incorporates by
reference its Registration
Statement on Form N-14 filed on
March 12, 2009 (SEC Accession
No. 0001193125-09-052545).
A Special Meeting of
Shareholders of DWS Janus
Growth & Income VIP (the
"Portfolio") was held on April
13, 2009 at the offices of
Deutsche Asset Management,
345 Park Avenue, New York, NY
10154. The following matter was
voted upon by the shareholders of
said Portfolio (the resulting votes
are presented below):

1. Approving an Agreement and
Plan of Reorganization and the
transactions it contemplates,
including the transfer of all of the
assets of the Portfolio to DWS
Capital Growth VIP ("Capital
Growth"), in exchange for shares
of Capital Growth and the
assumption by Capital Growth of
all the liabilities of the Portfolio,
and the distribution of such
shares, on a tax-free basis for
federal income tax purposes, to
the shareholders of the Portfolio
in complete liquidation and
termination of the Portfolio.

Number of Votes:
For
Against
Abstain
9,061,667.460
321,646.835
769,831.603
Exhibit 31.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Timothy J. Schneider, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of County Bancorp, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 28, 2016

 

|                      |                          |        |
|----------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                 | /s/ Timothy J. Schneider |   |
| Timothy J. Schneider |
| President            |
#### Shelia JOHNSON v. Ricky W. WITCHER, a minor, and Bob Witcher.

No. 49616.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 21, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 26, 1977.

Mitchell, Rogers, Eskridge, Voge & Clayton, Claude F. Clayton, Jr., Tupelo, for appellant.

Bramlett, Mounce & Soper, Paul Kent Bramlett, Tupelo, for appellees.

Before INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON and BOWLING, JJ.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, BROOM and LEE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit (a)(xxxiii)

 

----
#### Herbert A. KAPLAN, Appellant, v. Ben CIAVARELLA and Frank Ciavarella, Appellees.

No. 76-1460.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 16, 1977.

*701Larry Klein, West Palm Beach, and Brennan, McAliley, Albury & Hayskar, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

B. F. Paty, Jr., Paty, Downey, Lewis, Eaton, Fick & Martin, Palm Beach, for ap-pellees.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appealed is an Order for new trial after jury verdict which the court determined was not lawfully reached. The trial court held “. . . under no theory advanced either by the Plaintiffs or by the Defendant could the jury have lawfully reached its verdict of $19,075.00. This award is below the lowest amount which could possibly be reached under the evidence.”

The Appellant has demonstrated and we find in the record a theory upon which the jury could have lawfully reached its verdict. Therefore the Order for new trial is reversed and the cause remanded for judgment on the verdict. *Heymann v. Fusco,*132 So.2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

CROSS and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
RAPED

MT ENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA

Center for

Veterinary

Medicine
 

 Turtle-Associated 

Salmonella Infections

Despite the ban on selling turtles with a 

shell less than 4 inches, some pet shops,

fleamarkets, street vendors, and online stores

continue to sell small turtles, sometimes with 

devastating consequences. An example is 

the 2007 death of a four-week-old baby in 

Florida linked to Salmonella from a small 

turtle. The DNA of the Salmonella from the 

turtle matched that from the infant.

From May 1, 2007, to January 18, 2008, the

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

(CDC) received reports of Salmonella infection in 103 people—most of them children—

in 33 states. Fortunately, there were no 

deaths. However, 24 people were so sick that 

they landed in the hospital. The investigation

showed that most of the sick people were 

exposed to a turtle (touching, feeding,

cleaning habitat, changing water) shortly 

before they got sick. Two teenaged girls 

who became ill had been swimming in 

an unchlorinated, in-ground pool where 

the family’s pet turtles had also 

been allowed 

to swim.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6525
JOSUE EDMONDS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus D. SCOTT DODRILL, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-175-5-BO) Submitted: August 9, 2001 Decided: August 15, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Josue Edmonds, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Josue Edmonds appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Edmonds v. Dodrill , No. CA-01-175-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filedMar. 6, 2001; entered Mar. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Moise RIVERA, a/k/a Moses Rivera, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-39.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 9, 1978.

Gary I. Zwickel of Reniek, Zwickel & Gross, Lake Worth, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

CROSS, LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.
#### U. I. P. CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. William G. KRANICH, Appellee.

No. 72-541.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 8, 1973.

Adrian S. Bacon, of Bacon & Hanley, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Thomas A. Smith, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

At first blush this case gave us considerable pause, not the least cause for which was the excellence of the brief and oral argument of appellant’s counsel. Upon *51careful consideration, however, we are persuaded that the trial judge committed no demonstrable reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

LILES and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

MANN, C. J., concurs in the result.
#### Thornton E. ROUND et al., Petitioners, v. Sturgis C. LYSTER, a/k/a S. C. Lyster, Respondent.

No. 43832.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 10, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 276 So.2d 186.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADKINS, JJ., concur.

BOYD, J., dissents.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Mark CHRISMAN.

No. 60805.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 12, 1977.

In re: Mark Chrisman applying for Writs of Certiorari, Review and Mandamus.

Writ granted. Trial judge ordered to permit Dr. J. Thomas Ungeleider to testify on October 14, 1977, or to allow his deposition to be taken and received in evidence in lieu of his testimony. Thereafter, trial judge should reconsider his rulings on defendant’s motions to quash and suppress in view of the additional evidence.

SANDERS, C. J.,

dissents from the granting of the writ.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents from this ex parte decree on the question of admissibility of evidence upsetting the ruling of the trial judge. Applicant has an adequate remedy by review in the event of conviction and this court should not interfere with the orderly proceedings in the trial court in the absence of palpable error, irreparable injury or great harm. Neither of these has been shown here.