72140 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2014–1012] 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf 

Intracoastal Waterway, Belle Chasse, 

LA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of deviation from 

drawbridge regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a 

temporary deviation from the operating 

schedule that governs the Louisiana 

State Route 23 (LA 23) vertical lift span 

bridge, also known as the Judge Perez 

Bridge, across the Gulf Intracoastal 

Waterway (Algiers Alternate Route), 

mile 3.8, at Belle Chasse, Plaquemines 

Parish, Louisiana. This deviation is 

necessary to provide for the safe 

movement of vehicular traffic during 

major plant reconstruction on one side 

of the waterway and the resulting 

change in work schedule and increase 

in workforce transiting the bridge. This 

deviation allows the bridge to remain 

temporarily closed to navigation for an 

additional one hour in the evening 

during weekdays for five weeks. 

DATES: This deviation is effective 

without actual notice from December 5, 

2014 through 6:30 p.m. on December 25, 

2014. For the purposes of enforcement, 

actual notice will be used from 5:30 

p.m. on November 24, 2014, until 

December 5, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this 

deviation, [USCG–2014–1012] is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Type the docket number in the 

‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ 

Click on Open Docket Folder on the line 

associated with this deviation. You may 

also visit the Docket Management 

Facility in Room W12–140 on the 

ground floor of the Department of 

Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this temporary 

deviation, call or email David Frank, 

Bridge Administration Branch, Coast 

Guard; telephone 504–671–2128, email 

David.M.Frank@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing the docket, call 

Cheryl F. Collins, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 10, 2014, a Notice of 

Temporary Deviation entitled, 

‘‘Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf 

Intracoastal Waterway, Belle Chasse, 

LA’’ was published in the Federal 

Register. 79 FR 66621. 

That temporary deviation allowed for 

the Louisiana State Route 23 (LA 23) 

vertical lift span bridge, also known as 

the Judge Perez Bridge, across the Gulf 

Intracoastal Waterway (Algiers Alternate 

Route), mile 3.8, at Belle Chasse, 

Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, to 

remain closed to navigation for an 

additional one hour in the evenings 

from 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. from 

December 26, 2014, through February 

20, 2015. 

Subsequent to publication, the Sheriff 

of Plaquemines Parish requested by 

letter dated November 18, 2014, that the 

additional one hour deviation 

commence immediately because of 

major safety concerns with regard to 

parish residents and the ability of 

emergency vehicles to transit the area. 

The Sheriff of Plaquemines Parish 

indicated that the area has experienced 

increased traffic during a construction 

pre-shut down phase at the Phillips 66 

plant. 

The deviation requested allows the 

bridge to remain closed to navigation for 

an additional one hour in the evening, 

Monday through Friday, effecting a total 

deviation period from Friday, November 

24, 2014, through Friday, February 20, 

2015. Coordination with local Coast 

Guard and waterway users was 

conducted, and immediate 

commencement of the deviation will not 

have a significant impact on mariners. 

Presently, in accordance with 33 CFR 

117.451(b), the draw shall open on 

signal; except that, from 6 a.m. to 8:30 

a.m. and from 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays, the draw need not open for the 

passage of vessels. 

This temporary deviation allows the 

vertical lift bridge to remain closed to 

navigation for one additional hour in 

the afternoon. This additional hour 

extends the afternoon curfew hours to 

6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday 

beginning November 24, 2014 through 

December 25, 2014. In case of an 

emergency, the bridge will be able to 

open for the passage of vessels. 

The State Route 23 vertical lift span 

drawbridge across the Gulf Intracoastal 

Waterway (Algiers Alternate Route), 

mile 3.8, at Belle Chasse, Louisiana has 

a vertical clearance of 40 feet above 

mean high water in the closed-tonavigation position and 100 feet above 

mean high water in the open-tonavigation position. Navigation on the 

waterway consists primarily of tugs 

with tows, commercial fishing vessels, 

and occasional recreational craft. 

Mariners may use the Gulf Intracoastal 

Waterway (Harvey Canal) to avoid 

unnecessary delays. The Coast Guard 

has coordinated this closure with the 

Gulf Intracoastal Canal Association 

(GICA). The GICA representative 

indicated that the vessel operators will 

be able to schedule transits through the 

bridge to avoid delays and significant 

impacts on operations. Due to prior 

experience, as well as coordination with 

waterway users, it has been determined 

that this closure will not have a 

significant effect on these vessels. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35, 

the drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the effective period of this 

temporary deviation. 

This deviation from the operating 

regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 

117.35. 

Dated: November 24, 2014. 

David M. Frank, 

Bridge Administrator, Eighth Coast Guard 

District. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28602 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0668; FRL–9918–42] 

2,5-Furandione, Polymer With 

Methoxyethene, Butyl Ethyl Ester, 

Sodium Salt; Tolerance Exemption 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of 2,5-Furandione, 

polymer with methoxyethene, butyl 

ethyl ester, sodium salt; when used as 

an inert ingredient in a pesticide 

chemical formulation. The firm Lewis & 

Harrison, on behalf of International 

Specialty Products submitted a petition 

to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, 

and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting 

an exemption from the requirement of a 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 72141 

tolerance. This regulation eliminates the 

need to establish a maximum 

permissible level for residues of 2,5- 

Furandione, polymer with 

methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt on food or feed 

commodities. 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

December 5, 2014. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or before February 3, 2015, and must 

be filed in accordance with the 

instructions provided in 40 CFR part 

178 (see also Unit I.C. of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0668, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Lewis, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; main telephone 

number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 

through the Government Printing 

Office’s e-CFR site at http://

www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/

40tab_02.tpl. 

C. Can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2014–0668 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before February 3, 2015. Addresses for 

mail and hand delivery of objections 

and hearing requests are provided in 40 

CFR 178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 

Information not marked confidential 

pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be 

disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 

notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your 

objection or hearing request, identified 

by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2014–0668, by one of the following 

methods. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be CBI or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. Background and Statutory Findings 

In the Federal Register of October 15, 

2014 (79 FR 61844) (FRL–9917–24), 

EPA issued a document pursuant to 

FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a, 

announcing the receipt of a pesticide 

petition (PP IN–10755) filed by the firm 

Lewis & Harrison, 122 C Street NW., 

Suite 505, Washington, DC 20001, on 

behalf of International Specialty 

Products. The petition requested that 40 

CFR 180.960 be amended by 

establishing an exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance for residues 

of 2,5-Furandione, polymer with 

methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt (CAS Reg. No. 1471342–08– 

1). That document included a summary 

of the petition prepared by the 

petitioner and solicited comments on 

the petitioner’s request. A comment was 

received on the notice of filing. EPA’s 

response to the comment is discussed in 

Unit VIII.B. 

Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA 

allows EPA to establish an exemption 

from the requirement for a tolerance (the 

legal limit for a pesticide chemical 

residue in or on a food) only if EPA 

determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’ 

Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA 

defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result from aggregate exposure to the 

pesticide chemical residue, including 

all anticipated dietary exposures and all 

other exposures for which there is 

reliable information.’’ This includes 

exposure through drinking water and 

use in residential settings, but does not 

include occupational exposure. Section 

408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 

give special consideration to exposure 

of infants and children to the pesticide 

chemical residue in establishing an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result to infants and children from 

aggregate exposure to the pesticide 

chemical residue . . .’’ and specifies 

factors EPA is to consider in 

establishing an exemption. 

III. Risk Assessment and Statutory 

Findings 

EPA establishes exemptions from the 

requirement of a tolerance only in those 

cases where it can be shown that the 

risks from aggregate exposure to 

pesticide chemical residues under 

reasonably foreseeable circumstances 

will pose no appreciable risks to human 

health. In order to determine the risks 

from aggregate exposure to pesticide 

inert ingredients, the Agency considers 

the toxicity of the inert in conjunction 

with possible exposure to residues of 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
72142 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

the inert ingredient through food, 

drinking water, and through other 

exposures that occur as a result of 

pesticide use in residential settings. If 

EPA is able to determine that a finite 

tolerance is not necessary to ensure that 

there is a reasonable certainty that no 

harm will result from aggregate 

exposure to the inert ingredient, an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance may be established. 

Consistent with FFDCA section 

408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the 

available scientific data and other 

relevant information in support of this 

action and considered its validity, 

completeness and reliability and the 

relationship of this information to 

human risk. EPA has also considered 

available information concerning the 

variability of the sensitivities of major 

identifiable subgroups of consumers, 

including infants and children. In the 

case of certain chemical substances that 

are defined as polymers, the Agency has 

established a set of criteria to identify 

categories of polymers expected to 

present minimal or no risk. The 

definition of a polymer is given in 40 

CFR 723.250(b) and the exclusion 

criteria for identifying these low-risk 

polymers are described in 40 CFR 

723.250(d). 2,5-Furandione, polymer 

with methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt conforms to the definition 

of a polymer given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) 

and meets the following criteria that are 

used to identify low-risk polymers. 

1. The polymer is not a cationic 

polymer nor is it reasonably anticipated 

to become a cationic polymer in a 

natural aquatic environment. 

2. The polymer does contain as an 

integral part of its composition the 

atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, and 

oxygen. 

3. The polymer does not contain as an 

integral part of its composition, except 

as impurities, any element other than 

those listed in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii). 

4. The polymer is neither designed 

nor can it be reasonably anticipated to 

substantially degrade, decompose, or 

depolymerize. 

5. The polymer is manufactured or 

imported from monomers and/or 

reactants that are already included on 

the TSCA Chemical Substance 

Inventory or manufactured under an 

applicable TSCA section 5 exemption. 

6. The polymer is not a water 

absorbing polymer with a number 

average molecular weight (MW) greater 

than or equal to 10,000 daltons. 

7. The polymer does not contain 

certain perfluoroalkyl moieties 

consisting of a CF3- or longer chain 

length as specified in 40 CFR 

723.250(d)(6) and less than 5% 

oligomeric material below MW 1,000. 

Thus, 2,5-Furandione, polymer with 

methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt meets the criteria for a 

polymer to be considered low risk under 

40 CFR 723.250. Based on its 

conformance to the criteria in this unit, 

no mammalian toxicity is anticipated 

from dietary, inhalation, or dermal 

exposure to 2,5-Furandione, polymer 

with methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt. 

IV. Aggregate Exposures 

For the purposes of assessing 

potential exposure under this 

exemption, EPA considered that 2,5- 

Furandione, polymer with 

methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt could be present in all raw 

and processed agricultural commodities 

and drinking water, and that nonoccupational non-dietary exposure was 

possible. The number average MW of 

2,5-Furandione, polymer with 

methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt is 18,200 daltons. Generally, 

a polymer of this size would be poorly 

absorbed through the intact 

gastrointestinal tract or through intact 

human skin. Since 2,5-Furandione, 

polymer with methoxyethene, butyl 

ethyl ester, sodium salt conform to the 

criteria that identify a low-risk polymer, 

there are no concerns for risks 

associated with any potential exposure 

scenarios that are reasonably 

foreseeable. The Agency has determined 

that a tolerance is not necessary to 

protect the public health. 

V. Cumulative Effects From Substances 

With a Common Mechanism of Toxicity 

Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA 

requires that, when considering whether 

to establish, modify, or revoke a 

tolerance, the Agency consider 

‘‘available information’’ concerning the 

cumulative effects of a particular 

pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other 

substances that have a common 

mechanism of toxicity.’’ 

EPA has not found 2,5-Furandione, 

polymer with methoxyethene, butyl 

ethyl ester, sodium salt to share a 

common mechanism of toxicity with 

any other substances, and 2,5- 

Furandione, polymer with 

methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt does not appear to produce 

a toxic metabolite produced by other 

substances. For the purposes of this 

tolerance action, therefore, EPA has 

assumed that 2,5-Furandione, polymer 

with methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt does not have a common 

mechanism of toxicity with other 

substances. For information regarding 

EPA’s efforts to determine which 

chemicals have a common mechanism 

of toxicity and to evaluate the 

cumulative effects of such chemicals, 

see EPA’s Web site at http://

www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative. 

VI. Additional Safety Factor for the 

Protection of Infants and Children 

Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA 

provides that EPA shall apply an 

additional tenfold margin of safety for 

infants and children in the case of 

threshold effects to account for prenatal 

and postnatal toxicity and the 

completeness of the data base unless 

EPA concludes that a different margin of 

safety will be safe for infants and 

children. Due to the expected low 

toxicity of 2,5-Furandione, polymer 

with methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt, EPA has not used a safety 

factor analysis to assess the risk. For the 

same reasons the additional tenfold 

safety factor is unnecessary. 

VII. Determination of Safety 

Based on the conformance to the 

criteria used to identify a low-risk 

polymer, EPA concludes that there is a 

reasonable certainty of no harm to the 

U.S. population, including infants and 

children, from aggregate exposure to 

residues of 2,5-Furandione, polymer 

with methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt. 

VIII. Other Considerations 

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology 

An analytical method is not required 

for enforcement purposes since the 

Agency is establishing an exemption 

from the requirement of a tolerance 

without any numerical limitation. 

B. Response to Comments 

One comment was received for a 

notice of filing from a private citizen 

who opposed any pesticide product that 

leaves a residue above 0.00. The Agency 

understands the commenter’s concerns 

and recognizes that some individuals 

believe that no residue of pesticides 

should be allowed. However, under the 

existing legal framework provided by 

FFDCA section 408, EPA is authorized 

to establish pesticide tolerances or 

exemptions where persons seeking such 

tolerances or exemptions have 

demonstrated that the pesticide meets 

the safety standard imposed by the 

statute. 

C. International Residue Limits 

In making its tolerance decisions, EPA 

seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with 

international standards whenever 

possible, consistent with U.S. food 

safety standards and agricultural 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 72143 

practices. EPA considers the 

international maximum residue limits 

(MRLs) established by the Codex 

Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as 

required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). 

The Codex Alimentarius is a joint 

United Nations Food and Agriculture 

Organization/World Health 

Organization food standards program, 

and it is recognized as an international 

food safety standards-setting 

organization in trade agreements to 

which the United States is a party. EPA 

may establish a tolerance that is 

different from a Codex MRL; however, 

FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that 

EPA explain the reasons for departing 

from the Codex level. 

The Codex has not established a MRL 

for 2,5-Furandione, polymer with 

methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt. 

IX. Conclusion 

Accordingly, EPA finds that 

exempting residues of 2,5-Furandione, 

polymer with methoxyethene, butyl 

ethyl ester, sodium salt from the 

requirement of a tolerance will be safe. 

X. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This final rule establishes a tolerance 

under FFDCA section 408(d) in 

response to a petition submitted to the 

Agency. The Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) has exempted these rules 

from review under Executive Order 

12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning 

and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4, 

1993). Because this final rule has been 

exempted from review under Executive 

Order 12866, this final rule is not 

subject to Executive Order 13211, 

entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning 

Regulations That Significantly Affect 

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 

FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive 

Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997). This final rule does not 

contain any information collections 

subject to OMB approval under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it involve 

any technical standards that would 

require Agency consideration of 

voluntary consensus standards pursuant 

to section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 

note). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under FFDCA section 408(d), such as 

the tolerance in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.), do not apply. 

This final rule directly regulates 

growers, food processors, food handlers, 

and food retailers, not States or tribes, 

nor does this action alter the 

relationships or distribution of power 

and responsibilities established by 

Congress in the preemption provisions 

of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, 

the Agency has determined that this 

action will not have a substantial direct 

effect on States or tribal governments, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States or tribal 

governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

Tribes, or otherwise have any unique 

impacts on local governments. Thus, the 

Agency has determined that Executive 

Order 13132, entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 

FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and 

Executive Order 13175, entitled 

‘‘Consultation and Coordination with 

Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 

67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply 

to this final rule. In addition, this final 

rule does not impose any enforceable 

duty or contain any unfunded mandate 

as described under Title II of the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). 

Although this action does not require 

any special considerations under 

Executive Order 12898, entitled 

‘‘Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994), EPA seeks to achieve 

environmental justice, the fair treatment 

and meaningful involvement of any 

group, including minority and/or lowincome populations, in the 

development, implementation, and 

enforcement of environmental laws, 

regulations, and policies. As such, to the 

extent that information is publicly 

available or was submitted in comments 

to EPA, the Agency considered whether 

groups or segments of the population, as 

a result of their location, cultural 

practices, or other factors, may have 

atypical or disproportionately high and 

adverse human health impacts or 

environmental effects from exposure to 

the pesticide discussed in this 

document, compared to the general 

population. 

XI. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: November 24, 2014. 

Susan Lewis, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.960, the table is amended 

by alphabetically adding an entry for 

‘‘2,5-Furandione, polymer with 

methoxyethene, butyl ethyl ester, 

sodium salt, minimum number average 

molecular weight (in amu), 18,200’’ after 

the entry for ‘‘2,5-Furandione, polymer 

with ethenylbenzene, reaction, products 

with polyethylene-polypropylene glycol 

2-aminopropyl Me ether; minimum 

number average molecular weight (in 

amu), 14,000’’ to read as follows: 

§ 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the 

requirement of a tolerance. 

* * * * * 

Polymer CAS No. 

* * * * * 

2,5-Furandione, polymer with 

methoxyethene, butyl ethyl 

ester, sodium salt, minimum number average molecular weight (in amu), 

18,200 ............................... 1471342–08–1 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–28603 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 1 and 22 

[WT Docket No. 12–40; RM–11510; FCC 14– 

181] 

Cellular Service, Including Changes in 

Licensing of Unserved Area 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES