UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549




FORM 10-K





x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010




Commission File Number: 333-161943




SPORT ENDURANCE, INC.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




Nevada
27-2754069(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)




1890 South  3850 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84104


(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)




(877) 255-9218


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)




Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None





Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:





Common Stock, Par Value $.001


(Title of class)





Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.


Yes o     No x





Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.


Yes o     No x





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


Yes x     No o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)


Yes x     No o




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.




Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer oNon-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company x(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


Yes x     No o





The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of February 28, 2010, was approximately $3,000 based on a share value of $0.001. All executive officers and directors of the registrant have been deemed, solely for the purpose of the foregoing calculation, to be "affiliates" of the registrant.





Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: 60,200,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock outstanding as of December 14, 2010.










TABLE OF CONTENTS


PagePART ISpecial Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

3Item 1. Business

4Item 1A. Risk Factors

4Item 2. Properties

10Item 3. Legal Proceedings

10Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

10PART IIItem 5. Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

11Item 6. Selected Financial Data

12Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

12Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

15Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

16Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

17Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures

17Item 9B. Other Information

18PART IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

18Item 11. Executive Compensation

20Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

21Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

22Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

22PART IVItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

23SIGNATURES

24




2





FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS





This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements”.  All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to, any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objections of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.




Forward-looking statements may include the words “may,” “could,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” “believe,” “expect” or “anticipate” or other similar words. These forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they are made. Except for our ongoing securities laws, we do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any forward-looking statement.  Additionally, the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 most likely do not apply to our forward-looking statements as a result of being a penny stock issuer.  You should, however, consult further disclosures we make in future filings of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.




Although we believe the expectations reflected in any of our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in any of our forward-looking statements.  Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties.The factors impacting these risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:




●
Our current deficiency in working capital;●
Increased competitive pressures from existing competitors and new entrants;●
Our ability to market our services to new subscribers;●
Inability to locate additional revenue sources and integrate new revenue sources into our organization;●
Adverse state or federal legislation or regulation that increases the costs of compliance, or adverse findings by a regulator with respect to existing operations;●
Changes in U.S. GAAP or in the legal, regulatory and legislative environments in the markets in which we operate;●
Consumer acceptance of price plans and bundled offering of our services;●
Loss of customers or sales weakness;●
Technological innovations;●
Inability to efficiently manage our operations;●
Inability to achieve future sales levels or other operating results;●
Inability of management to effectively implement our strategies and business plan●
Key management or other unanticipated personnel changes;●
The unavailability of funds for capital expenditures; and●
The other risks and uncertainties detailed in this report.




For a detailed description of these and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement, please see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this document.





EXPLANATORY NOTE





Unless otherwise noted, references in this registration statement to "SPORT ENDURANCE, INC.." the "Company," "we," "our" or "us" means SPORT ENDURANCE, INC.





AVAILABLE INFORMATION





We file annual, quarterly and special reports and other information with the SEC that can be inspected and copied at the public reference facility maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549-0405. Information regarding the public reference facilities may be obtained from the SEC by telephoning 1-800-SEC-0330. The Company’s filings are also available through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering Analysis and Retrieval System which is publicly available through the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov). Copies of such materials may also be obtained by mail from the public reference section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549-0405 at prescribed rates.





3




PART I


ITEM 1.  BUSINESS


Overview





We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 3, 2001 under the name of Cayenne Construction, Inc.  The Company ceased all development stage operations in 2002.  The Company was dormant from 2002 until July of 2009.  The Company has had no revenues or expenses for this time period.





The Company was revived on July 28, 2009 in order to enter into the energy Gel Cap and energy drink market. The Company changed its name to Sport Endurance, Inc. in August 2009.  On August 20, 2009 Robert Timothy acquired controlling interest in Sport Endurance, Inc.





Sport Endurance, Inc. is presently marketing for sale one Soft-Gel capsule (named Sport Endurance 8-hour Energy Soft-Gels).





Sport Endurance has not commenced its major operations of having its one product a soft-gel capsule named Sport Endurance 8-hour Energy Soft-Gels, manufactured by an unaffiliated outside provider (Soft Gel Technologies, Inc. (SGTI) and the Company has not distributed the product to anyone.  The company is presently marketing Sport Endurance 8-hour Energy Soft-Gels in the Salt Lake City, Utah area.  The company will not have any 8-hour Energy Soft-Gels manufactured until the company has sold the product to an end user.  Sport Endurance is considered a development stage company because it has not commenced its major operations. In addition the company has not achieved any revenue in connection with its business to date. As a result we are a startup company, that is, we have no operating history or revenue, and are at a competitive disadvantage.





The competition for and difficulty in selling energy Gel Caps may affect our ability to develop profitable operations in the future.  Companies that are engaged in energy Gel Caps, retail products, include large, established companies with substantial capabilities and long earnings records.





We have no operating history and expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future. Should we continue to incur losses for a significant amount of time, the value of your investment in the common shares could be affected downward, and you could even lose your entire investment.





We have not yet received any revenues from our development stage operations, nor have we otherwise engaged in any business operations. Sport Endurance is a development stage company and in the absence of revenues and operations the Independent Audit Report dated December 14, 2010, cites a going concern. The going concern statement opinion issued by the independent auditors is the result of a lack of operations and working capital.





The company will need to raise capital which concerned the independent auditors because there is insufficient cash for operations for the next twelve months.  We will have to seek other sources of capital.





We established the minimum amount of $ 75,000 that the company will need to raise through debt instruments such as bank loans, or private financing so that operations could start, in order to generate some type of revenue. Presently no other sources have been identified and it is unknown if any other sources will be identified. There is no assurance that the company will be able to obtain any bank loans or private financing.





In 2011 Sport Endurance, Inc. intends to market and distribute quality beverage, snacks and dietary supplements products.





In 2011 the company intends to offer Shocking Great Taste energy drinks in 6 flavors. Mango Cream, Raspberry Cream, Fruit Punch, Tropical, Doo Drop and Cran-Grape. The company intends to offer regular and sugar free versions of Mango Cream.





In January of 2011, Sport Endurance intends to launch sugar free energy shots. The sugar free shots would be offered in 4 flavors, Mango, Tropical, Fruit Punch and Raspberry.





ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS





In addition to the other information in this Annual Report, the following risk factors, among others, should be considered carefully in evaluating the Company and its business.




4


Risks Related to Our Business





WE HAVE NO OPERATING HISTORY AND EXPECT TO INCUR LOSSES FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE. SHOULD WE CONTINUE TO INCUR LOSSES FOR A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME, THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT IN THE COMMON SHARES WILL BE AFFECTED, AND YOU COULD EVEN LOSE YOUR ENTIRE INVESTMENT.





We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 3, 2001 under the name of Cayenne Construction, Inc.  The Company ceased all development stage operations in 2002.  The Company was dormant from 2002 until July of 2009.  The Company has had no revenues or expenses for this time period.





The Company was revived on July 28, 2009 in order to enter into the energy Gel Cap and energy drink market. The Company changed its name to Sport Endurance, Inc. in August 2009.  On August 20, 2009 Robert Timothy acquired controlling interest in Sport Endurance, Inc. The company has no operating history from inception to Prospectus date.





Presently we have no revenues and development stage operating loss from inception to August 31, 2010 of $179,621.  We expect to incur further losses for the foreseeable future due to additional costs and expenses related to:


●
The implementation of our direct sales model through Mr. Timothy and Mr. Schuurman through the commencement of sales will cost at least $75,000. We need to establish and print all of the marketing material. We have allocated $15,000 toward marketing materials which include filers, broachers, website design.  The company intends to allocate these funds as soon as they are available.●
The development of strategic relationships with convenience stores in the Salt Lake City, Utah, area will cost the company at least $10,000. We need to educate convenience stores buyers about our products and work to obtain shelf space. We shall do this through direct sales and direct mail.  The company intends to allocate $5,000 as soon as funds are available to the company and $5,000 six months later when the funds become available.●
Software and hardware updates to maintain service and maintain the company office will cost the company at least $3,000.  As a direct sales company continued improvements and upgrade to our systems is required. User features and website content updates are vital to continued visitations by online users. This cost signifies the system modifications. The company intends to allocate these funds with four month of the funds becoming availabe.●
Program administration and working capital expenses until such time as there are sufficient sales to cash-flow operations will cost the company at least $30,000. This is the necessary working capital to fund operations until such time as revenues exceed expenses. This will cover office rent, at $1,995 per month, audit fees, legal and all other management expenses such as those from industry consultants and advisors.  The company intends to pay its lease payments on a timely basis on the first of every month and pay audit fees and legal and all other management fees as they become due.●
Manufacturing and packaging of 8 hour Energy Gel Caps - production of 26,584 6-pack cards will cost the company at least $17,000.  We would need $6,300- manufacturing of 159,504 capsules, $6,100- packaging into 6 pack blister cards, $500- packaging 12, 6 pack blister cards into a box, and $150- packaging 12 boxes into a master case. Delivery costs to Salt Lake City, Utah office $3,000 and $950 delivery to customer. The company intends to allocate funds to manufacturing, packaging and shipping only after a purchase order has been delivered to the company. (The company does not have a minimum amount that it must contract for in manufacturing or packaging its product.  The above costs are for the amounts stated.)


ONCE TRANSACTING BUSINESS, THE COMPETITION FOR AND DIFFICULTY IN SELLING ENERGY SOFT GEL CAPSULES COULD AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO DEVELOP PROFITABLE OPERATIONS.





Many companies that are engaged in the energy gel capsule business include large, established companies with substantial capabilities and long earnings records. We may be at a competitive disadvantage in promoting our Sport Endurance 8 hour soft Gel capsule, as we must compete with these companies, many of which have greater financial resources and larger technical staffs than we do.





WE HAVE NO OPERATING HISTORY AND FACE MANY OF THE RISKS AND DIFFICULTIES FREQUENTLY ENCOUNTERED BY A YOUNG COMPANY.





We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 3, 2001 under the name of Cayenne Construction, Inc.  The Company ceased all development stage operations in 2002.  The Company was dormant from 2002 until July of 2009.  The Company has had no revenues or expenses for this time period.





5




The Company was revived on July 28, 2009 and changed its name to Sport Endurance, Inc. in August 2009.  In August 2009 Robert Timothy acquired controlling interest in Sport Endurance, Inc.





We revived the company on July 28, 2009 and began developmental stage operations in August 2009.  We have a no  operating history for investors to evaluate the potential of our business development. We will begin to  market our one product in the Salt Lake City, Utah, area and development our brand name. In addition, we also face many of the risks and difficulties inherent in introducing a new product. These risks include the ability to:


●
Increase awareness of our brand name;●
Develop an effective business plan;●
Meet customer standards;●
Implement advertising and marketing plan;●
Attain customer loyalty;●
Maintain current strategic relationships and develop new strategic relationships;●
Respond effectively to competitive pressures;●
Continue to develop and upgrade our service; and●
Attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.


Our future will depend on our ability to raise additional capital and bring our service and products to the marketplace, which requires careful planning to provide a service and products that meets customer standards without incurring unnecessary cost and expense.





WE MAY NEED ADDITIONAL CAPITAL TO DEVELOP OUR BUSINESS.





The development of our services and product will require the commitment of resources to increase the advertising, marketing and future expansion of our business. In addition, expenditures will be required to enable us to conduct existing and planned business research, development of products and associate offices, and marketing of our existing and future services and products. Currently, we have no established bank-financing arrangements and as of August 31, 2010 the company has $20,249 in working capital deficit.  We would need to seek additional financing through subsequent future private offering of our equity securities, or through strategic partnerships and other arrangements with corporate partners.





We cannot give you any assurance that any additional financing will be available to us, or if available, will be on terms favorable to us. The sale of additional equity securities could result in dilution to our stockholders. The occurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could require us to agree to operating and financing covenants that would restrict our future development stage operations. If adequate additional financing is not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to implement our business development plan or continue our business development stage operations. Presently no other sources have been identified and it is unknown if any other sources will be identified.





WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO BUILD OUR BRAND AWARENESS.





Development and awareness of our brand Sport Endurance will depend largely upon our success in creating a customer base and potential referral sources. In order to attract and retain customers and to promote and maintain our brand in response to competitive pressures, management plans to gradually increase over the next 12 months our marketing and advertising budgets as funding allows. If we are unable to economically promote or maintain our brand, then our business, results of development stage operations and financial condition could be severely harmed. We have not yet received any revenues from our development stage operations, nor have we otherwise engaged in any business operations and we do not have any customers.





FUTURE BUSINESS OPEARTIONS VIA THE INTERNET MAY SUBJECT US TO A NUMBER OF LAWS AND REGULATIONS TO BE ADOPTED WITH RESPECT TO THE INTERNET MARKETPLACE, AND THE UNCERTAINTY RELATED TO THE APPLICATION OF MANY EXISITNG LAWS TO THE INTERNET MARKETPLACE CREATES UNCERTAINITY TO OUR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT.





At present, selling Soft-Gel Caps and energy drinks is not a government-regulated industry, so we do not need to obtain governmental approval to market and sell our products over the Internet, except that we are subject to the laws and regulations generally applicable to businesses and directly applicable to offline and online commerce. However, because the Internet is interstate in nature, we are able to offer our products across the country.





In addition, our management is not certain how our business may be affected by the application of existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyrights, encryption, and other intellectual property issues, taxation, libel and export or import matters, because the vast majority of these laws were adopted prior to the advent of the Internet, and therefore, do not contemplate or address the unique issues of the Internet and related technologies. Changes in laws that are intended to address these issues could create uncertainty in the Internet marketplace, which could in the future reduce demand for our products or increase our cost of development stage operations as a result of litigation or arbitration.   Presently we have not yet received any revenues from our development stage operations, nor have we otherwise engaged in any business operations.




6




OUR FUTURE SUCCESS RELIES UPON A COMBINATION OF PATENTS AND PATENTS PENDING, PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY AND KNOW-HOW, TRADEMARKS, CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS AND OTHER CONTRACTUAL COVENANTS TO ESTABLISH AND PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.IF OUR PRODUCTS ARE DUPLICATED OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS WOULD BE NEGATIVELY IMPACTED.





Presently we do not have any applications submitted for trademark protection for "Sport Endurance” and our slogan "Shocking Great Taste," when funding permits we will apply for trademark protection.





Sport Endurance and Shocking Great Taste has not been approved. Because intellectual property protection is critical to our future success, we intend to rely heavily on trademark, trade secret protection and confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, customers, partners and others to protect proprietary rights. However, effective trademark, service mark and trade secret protection may not be available in every country in which we intend to sell our products and services online. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use our proprietary information. As a result, litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights to protect our trade secrets and to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of recourses and could significantly harm our business and operating results.





Furthermore, the relationship between regulations governing domain names and laws protecting trademarks and similar proprietary rights is unclear. Therefore, we may be unable to prevent third parties from acquiring domain names that are similar to, infringe upon or otherwise decrease the value of intended trademarks and other proprietary rights.





There can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against us. If infringement claims are brought against us, there can be no assurance that we will have the financial resources to defend against such claims or prevent an adverse judgment against us. In the event of an unfavorable ruling on any such claim, there can be no assurance that a license or similar agreement to utilize the intellectual property rights in question relied upon by us in the conduct of our business will be available to us on reasonable terms, if at all. The loss of such rights (or the failure by us to obtain similar licenses or agreements) could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.





WE HAVE RECEIVED AN OPINION OF GOING CONCERN FROM OUR AUDITORS.  IF WE DO NOT RECEIVE ADDITIONAL FUNDING, WE WOULD HAVE TO CURTAIL OR CEASE DEVELOPMENT STAGE OPERATIONS.  AN INVESTMENT IN OUR SECURITIES REPRESENTS SIGNIFICANT RISK AND YOU MAY LOSE ALL OR PART YOUR ENTIRE INVESTMENT.





Our independent auditors noted in their report accompanying our financial statements for the period ended August 31, 2010 that we have not made a profit. As of August 31, 2010, we had a cumulative loss of $179,621, They further stated that the uncertainty related to these conditions raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  At August 31, 2010, our cash was $59.  We do not currently have sufficient capital resources to fund operations.  To stay in business, we will need to raise additional capital through public or private sales of our securities, debt financing or short-term bank loans, or a combination of the foregoing.





We will need additional capital to fully implement our business, operating and development plans.  However, additional funding from an alternate source or sources may not be available to us on favorable terms, if at all.  To the extent that money is raised through the sale of our securities, the issuance of those securities could result in dilution to our existing security holder. If we raise money through debt financing or bank loans, we may be required to secure the financing with some or all of our business assets, which could be sold or retained by the creditor should we default in our payment obligations.  If we fail to raise sufficient funds, we would have to curtail or cease operations.





THE COMPANY IS GOVERNED BY MR. ROBERT TIMOTHY, OUR SOLE DIRECTOR, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRESIDENT, AND SECRETARY, (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER), AND, AS SUCH, THERE MAY BE SIGNIFICANT RISK TO THE COMPANY FROM A CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PERSPECTIVE.





Mr. ROBERT TIMOTHY, our Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, and Sole Director (Principal Executive Officer), makes decisions such as the approval of related party transactions, the compensation of Executive Officers, and the oversight of the accounting function.  There will be no segregation of executive duties and there may not be effective disclosure and accounting controls to comply with applicable laws and regulations, which could result in fines, penalties and assessments against us.  Accordingly, the inherent controls that arise from the segregation of executive duties may not prevail.  In addition, Mr. Timothy will exercise full control over all matters that typically require the approval of a Board of Directors.  Mr. Timothy’s actions are not subject to the review and approval of a Board of Directors and, as such, there may be significant risk to the Company.




7




Our Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, and Sole Director (Principal Executive Officer), Mr. Timothy, exercises control over all matters requiring shareholder approval including the election of directors and the approval of significant corporate transactions.  We have not voluntarily implemented various corporate governance measures, in the absence of which, shareholders may have more limited protections against the transactions implemented by Mr. Timothy, conflicts of interest and similar matters.





THE COMPANY IS HEAVILY RELIANT ON MR. ROBERT TIMOTHY, OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRESIDENT, SECRETARY, AND SOLE DIRECTOR (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER ), AND, AS SUCH, THE LOSS OF HIS SERVICES COULD HAVE SIGNIFICANT MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE COMPANY.





The Company is heavily dependent on the efforts of Mr. Timothy, its Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, and Sole Director (Principal Executive Officer).  The loss of his services could have a material adverse effect on the Company.  The Company currently does not maintain key man life insurance on this individual. Mr. Timothy has experience and past expertise in the energy drink business.  There can be no assurance that a suitable replacement could be found for him upon retirement, resignation, inability to act on our behalf, or death.   The company has no plans of entering into an employment agreement with Mr. Timothy.





OUR FUTURE GROWTH MAY REQUIRE RECRUITMMENT OF QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES.





In the event of our future growth in administration, marketing, and customer support functions, we may have to increase the depth and experience of our management team by adding new members. Our future success will depend to a large degree upon the active participation of our key officers and employees. There is no assurance that we will be able to employ qualified persons on acceptable terms. Lack of qualified employees may adversely affect our business development.





WE MAY INCUR SIGNIFICANT COSTS TO BE A PUBLIC COMPANY TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH U.S. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS AND WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ABSORB SUCH COSTS.





We may incur significant costs associated with our public company reporting requirements, costs associated with newly applicable corporate governance requirements, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other rules implemented by the SEC. We expect all of these applicable rules and regulations to significantly increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time consuming and costly. We also expect that these applicable rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these newly applicable rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs. In addition, we may not be able to absorb these costs of being a public company which will negatively affect our business development stage operations.





THE LIMITED PUBLIC COMPANY EXPERIENCE OF OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM COULD ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO COMPLY WITH THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF U.S. SECURITIES LAWS.





Ourmanagement team has limited public company experience, which could impair our ability to comply with legal and regulatory requirements such as those imposed by Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our senior management has never had sole responsibility for managing a publicly traded company. Such responsibilities include complying with federal securities laws and making required disclosures on a timely basis. Our senior management may not be able to implement programs and policies in an effective and timely manner that adequately respond to such increased legal, regulatory compliance and reporting requirements, including the establishing and maintaining internal controls over financial reporting.  Any such deficiencies, weaknesses or lack of compliance could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to comply with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which is necessary to maintain our public company status. If we were to fail to fulfill those obligations, our ability to continue as a U.S. public company would be in jeopardy in which event you could lose your entire investment in our company.





Risk Related To Our Capital Stock





WE MAY NEVER PAY ANY DIVIDENDS TO SHAREHOLDERS.





We have never declared or paid any cash dividends or distributions on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to support developmental stage operations and to finance expansion and therefore we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common or preferred stock in the foreseeable future.





The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be made at the discretion of the board of directors, and will depend upon, among other things, the results of our developmental stage operations, cash flows and financial condition, developmental stage operating and capital requirements, and other factors as the board of directors considers relevant. There is no assurance that future dividends will be paid, and, if dividends are paid, there is no assurance with respect to the amount of any such dividend.





8




OUR CONTROLLING SECURITY HOLDER MAY TAKE ACTIONS THAT CONFLICT WITH YOUR INTERESTS.





Mr. Timothy beneficially owns approximately 60%   of our capital stock with voting rights.  In this case, Mr. Timothy will be able to exercise control over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, amendment of our certificate of incorporation and approval of significant corporate transactions, and they will have significant control over our management and policies. The directors elected by our controlling security holder will be able to significantly influence decisions affecting our capital structure. This control may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control or changes in management, or limiting the ability of our other security holders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interest. For example, our controlling security holder will be able to control the sale or other disposition of our developmental stage operating businesses.





OUR ARTICLESOF INCORPORATION PROVIDE FOR INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS AT OUR EXPENSE AND LIMIT THEIR LIABILITY WHICH MAY RESULT IN A MAJOR COST TO US AND HURT THE INTERESTS OF OUR SHAREHOLDERS BECAUSE CORPORATE RESOURCES MAY BE EXPENDED FOR THE BENEFIT OF OFFICERS AND/OR DIRECTORS.





Our articles of incorporation and applicable Nevada law provide for the indemnification of our directors, officers, employees, and agents, under certain circumstances, against attorney's fees and other expenses incurred by them in any litigation to which they become a party arising from their association with or activities on our behalf. We will also bear the expenses of such litigation for any of our directors, officers, employees, or agents, upon such person's written promise to repay us if it is ultimately determined that any such person shall not have been entitled to indemnification. This indemnification policy could result in substantial expenditures by us, which we will be unable to recoup.





We have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification for liabilities arising under federal securities laws is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification for liabilities arising under federal securities laws, other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding, is asserted by a director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will (unless in the opinion of our counsel, the matter has been settled by controlling precedent) submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction, the question whether indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. The legal process relating to this matter if it were to occur is likely to be very costly and may result in us receiving negative publicity, eitherof which factors is likely to materially reduce the market and price for our shares, if such a market ever develops.





THE OFFERING PRICE OF THE COMMON STOCK WAS ARBITRARILY DETERMINED, AND THEREFORE SHOULD NOT BE USED AS AN INDICATOR OF THE FUTURE MARKET PRICE OF THE SECURITIES. THEREFORE, THE OFFERING PRICE BEARS NO RELATIONSHIP TO OUR ACTUAL VALUE, AND MAY MAKE OUR SHARES DIFFICULT TO SELL.





Since our shares are not listed or quoted on any exchange or quotation system, the offering price of $0.001 per share for the shares of common stock was arbitrarily determined. The facts considered in determining the offering price were our financial condition and prospects, no operating history and the general condition of the securities market. The offering price bears no relationship to the book value, assets or earnings of our company or any other recognized criteria of value. The offering price should not be regarded as an indicator of the future market price of the securities.





YOU MAY EXPERIENCE DILUTION OF YOUR OWNERSHIP INTEREST BECAUSE OF THE FUTURE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK AND OUR PREFERRED STOCK.





In the future, we may issue our authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our present stockholders. We are currently authorized to issue an aggregate of 100,000,000 shares of capital stock consisting of 90,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.





We may also issue additional shares of our common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for common stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees or consultants, future acquisitions, future sales of our securities for capital raising purposes, or for other business purposes. The future issuance of any such additional shares of our common stock or other securities may create downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock. There can be no assurance that we will not be required to issue additional shares, warrants or other convertible securities in the future in conjunction with hiring or retaining employees or consultants, future acquisitions, future sales of our securities for capital raising purposes or for other business purposes.




9




OUR COMMON STOCK IS CONSIDERED PENNY STOCKS, WHICH MAY BE SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS ON MARKETABILITY, SO YOU MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SELL YOUR SHARES.





If our common stock becomes tradable in the secondary market, we will be subject to the penny stock rules adopted by the SEC that require brokers to provide extensive disclosure to their customers prior to executing trades in penny stocks. These disclosure requirements may cause a reduction in the trading activity of our common stock, which in all likelihood would make it difficult for our shareholders to sell their securities.





Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system). Penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The broker-dealer must also make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity, if any, in the secondary market for a security that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our securities, which could severely limit the market price and liquidity of our securities. These requirements may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and may affect your ability to resell our common stock.





THERE IS NO ASSURANCE OF A PUBLIC MARKET OR THAT OUR COMMON STOCK WILL EVER TRADE ON A RECOGNIZED EXCHANGE. THEREFORE, YOU MAY BE UNABLE TO LIQUIDATE YOUR INVESTMENT IN OUR STOCK.





There is no established public trading market for our common stock. Our shares have not been listed or quoted on any exchange or quotation system. There can be no assurance that a market maker will agree to file the necessary documents with FINRA, which operates the OTCBB, nor can there be any assurance that such an application for quotation will be approved or that a regular trading market will develop or that if developed, will be sustained. In the absence of a trading market, an investor may be unable to liquidate their investment.




ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES





The principal executive office of Sport Endurance, Inc. is located at 1890 South 3850 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84104. Our telephone number is: (877) 255-9218.




ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise, in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.




ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS





We did not submit any matters to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year 2010.




10


PART II





ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES




(a) Market Information





The Company's Common Stock is currently traded on the National Association of Security Dealers' over-the-counter bulletin board market (OTCBB) under the symbol SENZ.OB.The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices for each quarter within the last fiscal year, beginning with the commencement of our trading in June of 2010. The source of these quotations is the OTCBB Trade Activity Report. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.





COMMON STOCK MARKET PRICEHIGH


LOWFISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2010:Fourth Quarter

$
0.45


$
0.15Third Quarter

$
N/A


$
N/ASecond Quarter

$
N/A


$
N/AFirst Quarter

$
N/A


$
N/A





(b) Holders of Common Stock





We are authorized to issue 90,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share. Currently we have 60,200,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.  As of August 31, 2010, there were approximately thirty eight (38) shareholders of the Company’s common stock.  As of December 13, 2010, the closing price of the Company’s shares of common stock was $0.01 per share.  Signature Stock Transfer (telephone: (972)-612-4120; facsimile: (972) 612-4122 is the registrar and transfer agent for our common stock.





Each share of common stock shall have one (1) vote per share for all purposes. The holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at all meetings of our shareholders. Our common stock does not provide a preemptive, subscription or conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions or rights. Our common stock holders are not entitled to cumulative voting for election of the board of directors.





Holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends as may be declared by the board of directors out of funds legally available therefore as well as any distributions to the security holder. We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock, and do not expect to pay such dividends in the foreseeable future.





In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company, holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets remaining after payment of liabilities. Holders of common stock have no preemptive or other subscription or conversion rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock.





(c) Dividends





Sport Endurance, Inc. has never paid dividends on its Common Stock. Sport Endurance, Inc intends to follow a policy of retaining earnings, if any, to finance the growth of the business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of future dividends on the Common Stock will be at sole discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on Sport Endurance, Inc profitability and financial condition, capital requirements, statutory and contractual restrictions, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant.





(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans





The Company has not established any compensation plans to which our securities are authorized for issuance to employees or non-employees (such as directors, consultants and advisors) in exchange for consideration in the form of services.





(e) Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities





Options and Warrants Issued




No options or warrants were issued during the year ended August 31, 2010.





Options and Warrants Cancelled




No options or warrants were cancelled during the year ended August 31, 2010.




Options and Warrants Expired





No options or warrants expired during the year ended August 31, 2010.




11


Options Exercised





No options were exercised during the year ended August 31, 2010.





The foregoing securities were issued in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA





Not Required





ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.





Overview and Outlook





Sport Endurance, Inc. (“Sport Endurance”) is a Nevada corporation that intends to manufacture and distribute a line of sports energy drinks.  Production and distribution has not yet commenced, as such, the Company is considered to be in the development stage.





For the year ended August 31, 2010, we had a net loss of $38,421 as compared to a net loss of $-0- for the year ended August 31, 2009.  Our accumulated deficit as of August 31, 2010 was $179,621.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern over the next twelve months.





Results of Operations for the Years Ended August 31, 2010 and 2009





The following table summarizes selected items from the statement of operations for the year ended August 31, 2010 compared to August 31, 2009.





For the Years Ended

August 31,


Increase /

(Decrease)2010


2009General and administrative

$
15,486


$
-


$
15,486Professional fees


18,500







18,500Depreciation


4,192



-



4,192Net Operating (Loss)


(38,178
)


-



(38,178
)Total other income (expense)


(243
)


-



(243
)Net (Loss)

$
(38,421
)

$
-


$
(38,421
)





The Company had no operations during the year ending August 31, 2009, as such; there were no revenues or expenses.





General and administrative expenses





General and administrative expenses for the year ended August 31, 2010 were $15,486.  The increase in our general and administrative expenses consisted of bank fees and stock servicing costs attributed to the costs incurred to revive the entity and issue and maintain our shares of preferred and common stock.





Professional fees





Professional fees for the year ended August 31, 2010 were $18,500.  The increase in our professional fees was attributed to the legal and accounting costs incurred to revive the entity and file our financial reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).





Depreciation





Depreciation expenses for the year ended August 31, 2010 were $4,192.  The increases are due to the additional depreciation derived from the assets acquired on August 20, 2009.  We anticipate our quarterly depreciation expense to continue to be $1,048 for the near term.




12


Net operating (loss)





The net operating loss for the year ended August 31, 2010 was $38,178.  Our net operating loss consisted primarily of stock servicing costs and professional fees as we revived the entity in anticipation of developing our line of sport energy drinks.





Liquidity and Capital Resources





The following table summarizes total assets, accumulated deficit, stockholders equity and working capital at August 31, 2010 compared to August 31, 2009.





August 31, 2010


August 31, 2009Total Assets

$
23,202


$
30,340Accumulated (Deficit)

$
(179,621
)

$
(141,200
)Stockholders’ Equity

$
899


$
30,340Working Capital (Deficit)

$
(20,249
)

$
5,000





While we have raised capital to meet our working capital and financing needs in the past, additional financing is required in order to meet our current and projected cash flow deficits from operations and development of alternative revenue sources.  As of August 31, 2010, we had a working capital deficit of $(20,249).  Our poor financial condition raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and we have incurred losses since inception and may incur future losses.  In the past, we have conducted private placements of equity shares and during the year ending August 31, 2010 we received $8,980 in proceeds from a private placement of founder’s shares issued during the year ended August 31, 2009.  We also received a total of $7,440 in unsecured loans due on demand, bearing interest at 10%, from our CEO, Robert Timothy.





Should we not be able to continue to secure additional financing when needed, we may be required to slow down or suspend our growth or reduce the scope of our current operations, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business.





Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the development of our line of sport energy drinks; the cost and availability of third-party financing for development; and administrative and legal expenses.





We anticipate that we will incur operating losses in the next twelve months. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stage of development.  Such risks for us include, but are not limited to, an evolving and unpredictable business model; recognition of revenue sources; and the management of growth. To address these risks, we must, among other things, expand our customer base, implement and successfully execute our business and marketing strategy, respond to competitive developments, and attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.  There can be no assurance that we will be successful in addressing such risks, and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.





Satisfaction of our cash obligations for the next 12 months.





As of August 31, 2010, our cash balance was $59. Our plan for satisfying our cash requirements for the next twelve months is through sales-generated income, sale of shares of our common stock, third party financing, and/or traditional bank financing.  We anticipate sales-generated income during that same period of time, but do not anticipate generating sufficient amounts of revenues to meet our working capital requirements.  Consequently, we intend to make appropriate plans to secure sources of additional capital in the future to fund growth and expansion through additional equity or debt financing or credit facilities.





Going concern.





Our financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.  We have incurred continuous losses from operations, have an accumulated deficit of $179,621 and a working capital deficit of $20,249 at August 31, 2010, and have reported negative cash flows from operations since inception.  In addition, we do not currently have the cash resources to meet our operating commitments for the next twelve months.  The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, and complications frequently encountered by entrance into established markets and the competitive nature in which we operate.




13




Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to generate sufficient cash from operations to meet our cash needs and/or to raise funds to finance ongoing operations and repay debt.  There can be no assurance, however, that we will be successful in our efforts to raise additional debt or equity capital and/or that our cash generated by our future operations will be adequate to meet our needs. These factors, among others, indicate that we may be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.





Summary of product and research and development that we will perform for the term of our plan.





We are not anticipating significant research and development expenditures in the near future.





Expected purchase or sale of plant and significant equipment.





We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any plant or significant equipment as such items are not required by us at this time.





Significant changes in the number of employees.





As of August 31, 2010, we had no employees, other than our non-paid CEO, Robert Timothy.  Currently, there are no organized labor agreements or union agreements and we do not anticipate any in the future.





Assuming we are able to pursue revenue through the commencement of sales of our sports energy drinks, we anticipate an increase of personnel and may need to hire employees.  In the interim, we intend to use the services of independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services when appropriate.  We believe the use of third-party service providers may enhance our ability to control general and administrative expenses and operate efficiently.





Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements





We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results or operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.





Recently Issued Accounting Standards





In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18 regarding improving comparability by eliminating diversity in practice about the treatment of modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 – Receivable – Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (“Subtopic 310-30”). Furthermore, the amendments clarify guidance about maintaining the integrity of a pool as the unit of accounting for acquired loans with credit deterioration.  Loans accounted for individually under Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within Subtopic 310-40, Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments in this Update are effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.





In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 regarding subsequent events and amendments to certain recognition and disclosure requirements. Under this ASU, a public company that is a SEC filer, as defined, is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This ASU is effective upon the issuance of this ASU. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements.





In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 regarding fair value measurements and disclosures and improvement in the disclosure about fair value measurements. This ASU requires additional disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of fair value measurements, including a description of the reasons for the transfers.  Further, this ASU requires additional disclosures for the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, requiring presentation of information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.





In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. This standard also provides further guidance on how to determine a separate unit of accounting in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, became effective for the Company on September 1, 2010.





14




In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly, sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition standards or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, became effective for the Company on September 1, 2010.





In August 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the measurement of liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. This standard clarifies how a company should measure the fair value of liabilities and that restrictions preventing the transfer of a liability should not be considered as a factor in the measurement of liabilities within the scope of this standard. This standard is effective for the Company on September 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the impact of its adoption to be material to its financial statements.





In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “ASC”). The ASC has become the single source of non-governmental accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB in the preparation of financial statements. The ASC does not supersede the rules or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), therefore, the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC continue to be additional sources of GAAP for the Company. The Company adopted the ASC as of September 1, 2009. The ASC does not change GAAP and did not have an effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.





In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855-10 entitled “Subsequent Events”. Companies are now required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated by management. Public entities (as defined) must conduct the evaluation as of the date the financial statements are issued, and provide disclosure that such date was used for this evaluation. ASC 855-10 provides that financial statements are considered “issued” when they are widely distributed for general use and reliance in a form and format that complies with GAAP. ASC 855-10 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and must be applied prospectively. The adoption of ASC 855-10 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements. In connection with preparing the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements, management evaluated subsequent events through the date that such financial statements were issued (filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission).





ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK





This item in not applicable as we are currently considered a smaller reporting company.





15


ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA








Index to Financial Statements





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-1Balance Sheets as of August 31, 2010 and 2009

F-2Statements of Operations for the years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009 and the period from January 3, 2001 (inception) to August 31, 2010

F-3Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for the years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009 and the period from January 3, 2001 (inception) to August 31, 2010

F-4Statements of Cash Flow for the years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009 and the period from January 3, 2001 (inception) to August 31, 2010

F-5Notes to Financial Statements

F-6




16


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors


Sport Endurance, Inc.





We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Sport Endurance, Inc. as of August 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended and the period from January 3, 2001 (inception) to August 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
 We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.





In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sport Endurance, Inc., as of August 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the periods then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.





The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has insufficient working capital, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.








/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC


www.mkacpas.com


Houston, Texas


December 14, 2010





F-1




SPORT ENDURANCE, INC. (formerly Cayenne Construction, Inc.)


(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)


BALANCE SHEETS


August 31,


August 31,2010


2009ASSETSCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents

$
59


$
3,200Prepaid expenses


1,995



1,800Total current assets


2,054



5,000Equipment, net


21,148



25,340Total assets

$
23,202


$
30,340LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable

$
14,620


$
-Accrued Interest


243



-Due to officer


7,440



-Total current liabilities


22,303



-Total liabilities


22,303



-Stockholders' equity:Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 20,000,000 and 10,000,000shares authorized at August 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively,2,000,000 shares issued and outstanding


2,000



2,000Common stock, $0.001 par value, 480,000,000 and 90,000,000shares authorized at August 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively,57,200,000 shares issued and outstanding


57,200



57,200Common stock subscriptions receivable, -0- and 8,980,000shares as of as of August 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively


-



(8,980
)Additional paid-in capital


121,320



121,320(Deficit) accumulated during development stage


(179,621
)


(141,200
)Total stockholders' equity


899



30,340Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$
23,202


$
30,340





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.




F-2


SPORT ENDURANCE, INC. (formerly Cayenne Construction, Inc.)


(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)


STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


For the years ended


January 3, 2001August 31,


(inception) to2010


2009


August 31, 2010Revenue

$
-


$
-


$
-Expenses:General and administrative


15,486



-



18,686Professional fees


18,500



-



143,500Depreciation


4,192



-



4,192Total operating expenses


38,178



-



166,378Net operating (loss)


(38,178
)


-



(166,378
)Other expense:Interest expense


(243
)


-



(243
)Offering costs


-



-



(13,000
)Total other expense


(243
)


-



(13,243
)Loss before provision for income taxes


(38,421
)


-



(179,621
)Provision for income taxes


-



-



-Net (loss)

$
(38,421
)

$
-


$
(179,621
)Weighted average number of common sharesoutstanding - basic and fully diluted


57,200,000



29,797,808Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted

$
-


$
-





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.




F-3




SPORT ENDURANCE, INC. (formerly Cayenne Construction, Inc.)


(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
 STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY


Additional


Common stock


(Deficit)

accumulated

during


TotalPreferred stock


Common stock


paid-In


subscriptions


development


stockholders'Shares


Amount


Shares


Amount


capital


receivable


stage


equityCommon stock issued to founder at $0.001per share, of which $500 was paid in cash


-


$
-



1,200,000


$
1,200


$
-


$
-


$
-


$
1,200Sale of common stock for cash


-



-



3,000,000



3,000



12,000



-



-



15,000Net loss for the year ended August 31, 2001


-



-



-



-



-



-



(16,200
)


(16,200
)Balance, August 31, 2001


-



-



4,200,000



4,200



12,000



-



(16,200
)


-Issuance of common stock for professional fees


-



-



25,000,000



25,000



100,000



-



-



125,000Net loss for the year ended August 31, 2002


-



-



-



-



-



-



(125,000
)


(125,000
)Balance, August 31, 2002


-



-



29,200,000



29,200



112,000



-



(141,200
)


-Net loss for the year ended August 31, 2003


-



-



-



-



-



-



-



-Balance, August 31, 2003


-



-



29,200,000



29,200



112,000



-



(141,200
)


-Net loss for the year ended August 31, 2004


-



-



-



-



-



-



-



-Balance, August 31, 2004


-



-



29,200,000



29,200



112,000



-



(141,200
)


-Net loss for the year ended August 31, 2005


-



-



-



-



-



-



-



-Balance, August 31, 2005


-



-



29,200,000



29,200



112,000



-



(141,200
)


-Net loss for the year ended August 31, 2006


-



-



-



-



-



-



-



-Balance, August 31, 2006


-



-



29,200,000



29,200



112,000



-



(141,200
)


-Net loss for the year ended August 31, 2007


-



-



-



-



-



-



-



-Balance, August 31, 2007


-



-



29,200,000



29,200



112,000



-



(141,200
)


-Net loss for the year ended August 31, 2008


-



-



-



-



-



-



-



-Balance, August 31, 2008


-



-



29,200,000



29,200



112,000



-



(141,200
)


-Issuance of convertible preferred stock for cash


2,000,000



2,000



-



-



3,000



-



-



5,000Issuance of founder's shares in exchange forcontributed equipment at $0.001 per share


-



-



25,340,000



25,340



-



-



-



25,340Common stock subscription receivableissued to founder at $0.001 per share


-



-



8,980,000



8,980



-



(8,980
)


-



-Previously issued common stock cancelled


-



-



(6,320,000
)


(6,320
)


6,320



-



-



-Net loss for the year ended August 31, 2009


-



-



-



-



-



-



-



-Balance, August 31, 2009


2,000,000



2,000



57,200,000



57,200



121,320



(8,980
)


(141,200
)


30,340Sale of common stock for cash


-



-



-



-



-



8,980



-



8,980Net loss for the year ended August 31, 2010


-



-



-



-



-







(38,421
)


(38,421
)Balance, August 31, 2010


2,000,000


$
2,000



57,200,000


$
57,200


$
121,320


$
-


$
(179,621
)

$
899





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.




F-4




SPORT ENDURANCE, INC. (formerly Cayenne Construction, Inc.)
 (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
 STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


January 3, 2001For the years ended


(inception) toAugust 31,


August 31,2010


2009


2010CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIESNet (loss)

$
(38,421
)

$
-


$
(179,621
)Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)to net cash used in operating activities:Depreciation


4,192



-



4,192Shares issued for services


-



-



125,000Decrease (increase) in assets:Prepaid expenses


(195
)


-



(1,995
)Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable


14,620



-



14,620Accrued interest


243



-



243Net cash used in operating activities


(19,561
)


-



(37,561
)CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIESProceeds from Officer loans


7,440



-



7,440Proceeds from sale of common and preferred stock


8,980



-



30,180Net cash provided by financing activities


16,420



-



37,620NET CHANGE IN CASH


(3,141
)


-



59CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD


3,200



-



-CASH AT END OF PERIOD

$
59


$
-


$
59SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:Interest paid

$
-


$
-


$
-Income taxes paid

$
-


$
-


$
-Non-cash activities:Value of common stock issued for services


-



-



125,000Value of common stock issued for equipment


-



-



25,340




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
  F-5
  Sport Endurance, Inc. (formerly Cayenne Construction, Inc.)
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to Financial Statements




Note 1 – Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies





Nature of business


Sport Endurance, Inc. (“the Company”) was incorporated as Cayenne Construction, Inc. in the state of Nevada on January 3, 2001 (“Inception”). The Company was formed to be an independent service provider of ready-mix concrete, whereby management was to arrange purchases of ready-mixed concrete by small contractors and customers on a fee basis. The Company ceased operations in 2002 and was revived in 2009 with a name change to, “Sport Endurance, Inc.” on August 6, 2009. The Company intends to manufacture and distribute a line of sports energy drinks.





The Company is considered to be in the development stage as defined by FASB ASC 915-10-05. This standard requires companies to report their operations, shareholders equity and cash flows from inception through the reporting date. The Company will continue to be reported as a development stage entity until, among other factors, revenues are generated from management’s intended operations. Management has provided financial data since inception (January 3, 2001).





These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in US dollars. The Company has adopted a fiscal year end of August 31st.




Use of estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.




Cash and cash equivalents


We maintain cash balances in non-interest-bearing accounts, which do not currently exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.




Equipment


Equipment is recorded at the lower of cost or estimated net recoverable amount, and is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets as follows:




Computer equipment
5 yearsFurniture and fixtures
7 years




Maintenance and repairs will be charged to expense as incurred. Significant renewals and betterments will be capitalized. At the time of retirement or other disposition of equipment, the cost and accumulated depreciation will be removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss will be reflected in operations.





The Company will assess the recoverability of equipment by determining whether the depreciation and amortization of these assets over their remaining life can be recovered through projected undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of equipment impairment, if any, will be measured based on fair value and is charged to operations in the period in which such impairment is determined by management.




Start-Up Costs


The Company accounts for start-up costs, including organization costs, under the provisions of FASB ASC 720-15-25-1, whereby such costs are expensed as incurred.




Advertising and promotion


All costs associated with advertising and promoting products are expensed as incurred.





Income taxes


Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided for significant deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not, that such asset will not be recovered through future operations.




F-6




Sport Endurance, Inc. (formerly Cayenne Construction, Inc.)
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to Financial Statements




Fair value of Financial Instruments


Financial instruments consist principally of cash, trade and notes receivables, trade and related party payables and accrued liabilities. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments in the accompanying balance sheets approximate their fair values due to their relatively short-term nature. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.




Revenue recognition


For revenue from product sales, we will recognize revenue upon shipment or delivery to our customers based on written sales terms that do not allow for a right of return. As such, revenue is recognized at the time of sale if collectability is reasonably assured. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. The Company defers any revenue for which the product has not been delivered or is subject to refund until such time that the Company and the customer jointly determine that the product has been delivered or no refund will be required.




Basic and diluted loss per share


The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss adjusted on an “as if converted” basis, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive securities. For the periods presented, there were no outstanding potential common stock equivalents and therefore basic and diluted earnings per share result in the same figure.





Stock-based compensation


The Company adopted FASB guidance on stock based compensation upon inception at January 1, 2006. Under FASB ASC 718-10-30-2, all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. The Company has not had any stock options issued for services and compensation from inception through the period ended as presented, and the only issuance of stock for services from inception through the periods presented occurred on February 10, 2002 with the issuance of 125,000,000 shares valued at $125,000.





Our employee stock-based compensation awards are accounted for under the fair value method of accounting, as such, we record the related expense based on the more reliable measurement of the services provided, or the fair market value of the stock issued multiplied by the number of shares awarded.





We account for our employee stock options under the fair value method of accounting using a Black-Scholes valuation model to measure stock option expense at the date of grant. We do not backdate, re-price, or grant stock-based awards retroactively. As of the date of this report, we have not issued any stock options.




Forward stock split


On June 7, 2010, the board of directors approved a five-for-one stock split of the Corporation’s common stock to shareholders of record on June 7, 2010. The board of directors subsequently rescinded the stock split prior to the distribution of the shares of common stock. As such, stockholders’ equity and common stock activity for all periods presented have not been restated to give retroactive recognition to the stock split. In addition, all references in the financial statements, to weighted average number of shares, per share amounts, and market prices of the Company’s common stock have been stated without respect to the rescinded stock split.





Uncertain tax positions


Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted new standards for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. These standards prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. These standards also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.





Various taxing authorities periodically audit the Company’s income tax returns. These audits include questions regarding the Company’s tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income to various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposures connected with these various tax filing positions, including state and local taxes, the Company records allowances for probable exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which an allowance has been established, is audited and fully resolved. The Company has not yet undergone an examination by any taxing authorities.





The assessment of the Company’s tax position relies on the judgment of management to estimate the exposures associated with the Company’s various filing positions.




F-7




Sport Endurance, Inc. (formerly Cayenne Construction, Inc.)
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to Financial Statements




Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements


In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18 regarding improving comparability by eliminating diversity in practice about the treatment of modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 – Receivable – Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (“Subtopic 310-30”). Furthermore, the amendments clarify guidance about maintaining the integrity of a pool as the unit of accounting for acquired loans with credit deterioration.  Loans accounted for individually under Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within Subtopic 310-40, Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments in this Update are effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.





In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 regarding subsequent events and amendments to certain recognition and disclosure requirements. Under this ASU, a public company that is a SEC filer, as defined, is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This ASU is effective upon the issuance of this ASU. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements.





In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 regarding fair value measurements and disclosures and improvement in the disclosure about fair value measurements. This ASU requires additional disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of fair value measurements, including a description of the reasons for the transfers.  Further, this ASU requires additional disclosures for the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, requiring presentation of information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.





In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. This standard also provides further guidance on how to determine a separate unit of accounting in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective for the Company on September 1, 2010.





In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly, sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition standards or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective for the Company on September 1, 2010.





In August 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the measurement of liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. This standard clarifies how a company should measure the fair value of liabilities and that restrictions preventing the transfer of a liability should not be considered as a factor in the measurement of liabilities within the scope of this standard. This standard is effective for the Company on September 1, 2009. The adoption of this standard has not had a material effect on its financial statements.





In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “ASC”). The ASC has become the single source of non-governmental accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB in the preparation of financial statements. The ASC does not supersede the rules or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), therefore, the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC continue to be additional sources of GAAP for the Company. The Company adopted the ASC as of September 1, 2009. The ASC does not change GAAP and did not have an effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.




F-8




Sport Endurance, Inc. (formerly Cayenne Construction, Inc.)
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to Financial Statements




In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855-10 entitled “Subsequent Events”. Companies are now required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated by management. Public entities (as defined) must conduct the evaluation as of the date the financial statements are issued, and provide disclosure that such date was used for this evaluation. ASC 855-10 provides that financial statements are considered “issued” when they are widely distributed for general use and reliance in a form and format that complies with GAAP. ASC 855-10 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and must be applied prospectively. The adoption of ASC 855-10 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements. In connection with preparing the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements, management evaluated subsequent events through the date that such financial statements were issued (filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission).





Note 2 – Going Concern





As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring net losses from operations resulting in an accumulated deficit of $179,621, and a working capital deficit of $20,249 as of August 31, 2010. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management is actively pursuing new ventures to increase revenues. In addition, the Company is currently seeking additional sources of capital to fund short term operations. The Company, however, is dependent upon its ability to secure equity and/or debt financing and there are no assurances that the Company will be successful, therefore, without sufficient financing it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern.





The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of any uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements also do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.





Note 3 – Related Party





During the year ended August 31, 2010, the Company received loans from the CEO, Robert Timothy, to fund operations in the total amount of $7,440.





On February 10, 2002, the Company issued 125,000,000 shares to the Company President for professional services rendered. The fair value of those shares was $125,000 on the grant date.





On January 10, 2001 the Company issued 6,000,000 shares of common stock to the founder of the Company in exchange for proceeds of $500. Since the par value of the Company’s common stock is the legal minimum value, management recorded compensation for the difference between the amount paid of $500 and the minimum value of $1,200, or $700 in the accompanying statement of operations.





On October 1, 2009, the Company entered into a five year, non-cancellable, commercial and industrial lease with the parents of the Company’s CEO, Robert Timothy, Robert Timothy Sr. and DeVon Timothy, that calls for monthly lease payments of $2,135, including monthly charges of $140 for taxes and insurance. On October 1, 2009 the Company paid a $1,995 deposit. Terms of the lease were amended to defer the commencement of the lease until September 1, 2010.





Note 4 – Due to Officer





During the year ended August 31, 2010, the Company received various loans to fund operations in the total amount of $7,440, bearing interest at 10% and due on demand from the Company’s founder and CEO.





The Company has accrued interest of $243 as of August 31, 2010 related to the officer of the Company.




F-9




Sport Endurance, Inc. (formerly Cayenne Construction, Inc.)
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to Financial Statements




Note 5 – Equipment





Equipment consists of the following:





August 31,


August 31,2010


2009Computer equipment

$
10,000


$
10,000Furniture and fixtures


15,340



15,34025,340



25,340Less accumulated depreciation


(4,192
)


-$
21,148


$
25,340





Depreciation expense totaled $4,192 for the year ended August 31, 2010 and $-0- for the year ended August 31, 2009.





Note 6 – Stockholders’ Equity





On July 28, 2009, the shareholders of the Company voted to increase the authorized common shares of the Company’s common stock from 30,000,000 authorized shares of common stock to 90,000,000 authorized shares of common stock.  Additionally, the shareholders voted to establish preferred shares of the Company at 10,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock. As a result of this vote, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to reflect this change.





On June 7, 2010, the shareholders of the Company voted to increase the authorized common shares of the Company’s common stock from 90,000,000 authorized shares of common stock to 480,000,000 authorized shares of common stock.  Additionally, the shareholders voted to increase the authorized shares of the Company’s preferred stock from 10,000,000 authorized shares to 20,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock. As a result of this vote, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to reflect this change.




Forward stock split


On June 7, 2010, the board of directors approved a five-for-one stock split of the Corporation’s common stock to shareholders of record on June 7, 2010. The board of directors subsequently rescinded the stock split prior to the distribution of the shares of common stock. As such, stockholders’ equity and common stock activity for all periods presented have not been restated to give retroactive recognition to the stock split. In addition, all references in the financial statements, to weighted average number of shares, per share amounts, and market prices of the Company’s common stock have been stated without respect to the rescinded stock split.





Preferred stock


On August 15, 2009, the Company issued a total of 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock to two individual investors in a private placement under Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933 for $5,000 in cash, or $0.0025 per share.





Common stock


On August 20, 2009, the Company issued 8,980,000 founder’s shares of common stock in exchange for a subscription receivable of $8,980. The Company received proceeds of $8,980 during the year ended August 31, 2010.





On August 20, 2009, the Company issued 25,340,000 founder’s shares of common stock in exchange for contributed equipment with a cost basis of $25,340. The cost basis approximated the fair market value of the equipment.





On August 20, 2009, the Company cancelled and returned to treasury 6,320,000 shares of common stock previously issued to founders. No consideration was provided and the total par value of $6,320 was recorded as additional paid-in capital.





On February 10, 2002, the Company issued 25,000,000 shares to the Company President for professional services rendered. The fair value of those shares was $125,000 on the grant date.





The Company issued a total of 3,000,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock during May 2001 in a private placement under Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933 for $15,000 in cash, or $0.001 per share to a total of nineteen individual investors. Due to a lack of operations, management believes the purchase price of $0.001 per share is representative of fair value.




F-10




Sport Endurance, Inc. (formerly Cayenne Construction, Inc.)


(A Development Stage Company)


Notes to Financial Statements




On January 10, 2001 the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of common stock to the founder of the Company in exchange for proceeds of $500. Since the par value of the Company’s common stock is the legal minimum value, management recorded compensation for the difference between the amount paid of $500 and the minimum value of $1,200, or $700 in the accompanying statement of operations.





Note 7 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments





The Company adopted FASB ASC 820-10 on January 1, 2008. Under FASB ASC 820-10-5, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The standard outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures. Under GAAP, certain assets and liabilities must be measured at fair value, and FASB ASC 820-10-50 details the disclosures that are required for items measured at fair value.





The Company doesn’t have any financial instruments that must be measured under the new fair value standard. The Company currently does not have non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis, with the exception of equipment. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:





Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. The fair value of the Company’s cash is based on quoted prices and therefore classified as Level 1.





Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).





Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.




Note 8 – Income Taxes





The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10, which requires use of the liability method. FASB ASC 740-10-25 provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes, referred to as temporary differences.





As of August 31, 2010, the Company incurred a net operating loss and, accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At August 31, 2010, the Company had approximately $224,000 of federal net operating losses. The net operating loss carry forwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2021.





The components of the Company’s deferred tax asset are as follows:





August 31,2010Deferred tax assets:Net operating loss carry forwards

$
224,000Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance

$
78,400Less: Valuation allowance


(78,400
)Net deferred tax assets

$
-





Based on the available objective evidence, including the Company’s history of its loss, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, the Company provided for a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at August 31, 2010. The Company had no uncertain tax positions as of August 31, 2010.




F-11




Sport Endurance, Inc. (formerly Cayenne Construction, Inc.)
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to Financial Statements


A reconciliation between the amounts of income tax benefit determined by applying the applicable U.S. and State statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss is as follows:





August 31,2010Federal and state statutory rate
35%Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
(35%)




Note 9 – Subsequent Events





On October 12, 2010, one of the preferred stock shareholders converted 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock into 3,000,000 shares of common.





F-12




ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE





The financial statements included in this Form 10-K have been audited by M & K CPAS PLLC to the extent and for the periods set forth in their report appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting, we have not, nor has anyone engaged on our behalf, consulted with M&K CPAS, PLLC regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that may be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and M&K CPAS, PLLC did not provide either in a written report or oral advice to the Company that was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue; or (ii) the subject of any disagreement, as defined in Item 304 (a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions, or a reportable event within the meaning set forth in Item 304 (a)(1)(V) of Regulation S-K.





ITEM 9A(T).  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES





Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.





We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined) in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(c) and 15d – 15(e)).  Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.





Our Principal Executive Officer does not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. Although our disclosure controls and procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and our principal executive officer has determined that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at doing so, a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented if there exists in an individual a desire to do so. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.





Furthermore, smaller reporting companies face additional limitations. Smaller reporting companies employ fewer individuals and find it difficult to properly segregate duties. Often, one or two individuals control every aspect of the Company's operation and are in a position to override any system of internal control. Additionally, smaller reporting companies tend to utilize general accounting software packages that lack a rigorous set of software controls.





Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.





Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a- 15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. Management, with the participation of the Chief Executive, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  We have identified the following material weaknesses:





1.
As of August 31, 2010, we did not maintain effective controls over the control environment.  Specifically we have not developed and effectively communicated to our employees and consultants its accounting policies and procedures.  This has resulted in inconsistent practices. Further, the Board of Directors does not currently have any independent members and no director qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-B.  Since these entity level programs have a pervasive effect across the organization, management has determined that these circumstances constitute a material weakness.





2.
As of August 31, 2010, we did not maintain effective controls over financial statement disclosure. Specifically, controls were not designed and in place to ensure that all disclosures required were originally addressed in our financial statements.  Accordingly, management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.




17


Because of these material weaknesses, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2010 based on the criteria established in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the COSO.





Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting





There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting through the date of this report or during the quarter ended August 31, 2010, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.





Independent Registered Accountant’s Internal Control Attestation





This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.





ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION


None








PART III





ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE




The following table sets forth the names and positions of our executive officers and directors. Directors will be elected at our annual meeting of stockholders and serve for one year or until their successors are elected and qualify. Officers are elected by the Board and their terms of office are, except to the extent governed by employment contract, at the discretion of the Board.




Name

Age

Position

Director SinceRobert Timothy

33

Chief Executive Officer

August 20, 2009Ronald Schuurman

56

Chief Financial Officer

August 20, 2009





MANAGEMENT BIOGRAPHIES





ROBERT TIMOTHY, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRESIDENT, SECRETARY, AND DIRECTOR (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)





Mr. Robert Timothy, aged 33, is the Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, and Director (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company.  He was appointed August 20, 2009.





From March 3, 2007 to August 20, 2009, Mr. Timothy has acted as a Private consultant for Robert Timothy Consulting (RTC). As business consultants, RTC provides specialized marketing consulting services to start-up companies in the convenience store industry. Since 2007, Mr. Timothy has provided marketing support, developing marketing strategies and new product concepts, establishing distribution channels, analyzing branding initiatives for new companies.





Additionally, Mr. Timothy has experience in management and business operations.  From August 12, 1999 to March 3, 2007, Mr. Timothy worked for Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC as a financial planner/Private Access Relationship Manger.  Hisresponsibilities included building strong relationships, developing assets, acquiring new business and servicing Fidelity investments high net worth customers (Private Access Department). Other responsibilities included problem resolution, special projects and engage in discussions around Fidelity’s guidance offerings.





Trading included: stocks, options, mutual funds, precious metals, CD’s, Treasuries, Municipal and Commercial Bonds. Mr. Timothy holds the following Security licenses, Series7 and Series 63.





18




RONALD SCHUURMAN, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, TREASURE (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)





Mr. Ronald Schuurman, aged 56, is the Chief Financial Officer, Treasure and (Principal Financial Officer and of the Company.  He was appointed on August 20, 2009.





From May 10, 2007 to August 20, 2009 Mr. Ronald Schuurman worked for Robert Timothy Consulting (RTC).  As a business consultant, RTC provides specialized marketing consulting services to start-up companies in the convenience store industry.  Mr. Schuurman provided business consulting to RTC customers as to store management and product selection.


From October 10, 2006, to May 10, 2007 Mr.  Schuurman worked for WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., located Jacksonville, Florida as a Pricing and Assortment Manager (Category Manager).   He was responsible for product selection, pricing, and developing promotions and overseeing $350 million in annual sales.  He rolled out the price impact stores (Save Rite) 62 stores in 3 states.





Additionally, Mr.  Schuurman worked for SMITHS FOOD & DRUG, Albuquerque, New Mexico from September 5, 1981 to October 10, 2006where he was a Non Perishable Specialist(supervisor).  He was responsible for 25 stores merchandising and operations for all non perishable departments.





Limitation of Liability of Directors





Pursuant to the Nevada General Corporation Law, our Articles of Incorporation exclude personal liability for our Directors for monetary damages based upon any violation of their fiduciary duties as Directors, except as to liability for any breach of the duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or any transaction from which a Director receives an improper personal benefit. This exclusion of liability does not limit any right which a Director may have to be indemnified and does not affect any Director's liability under federal or applicable state securities laws. We have agreed to indemnify our directors against expenses, judgments, and amounts paid in settlement in connection with any claim against a Director if he acted in good faith and in a manner he believed to be in our best interests.





Election of Directors and Officers





Directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Officers are appointed to serve until the meeting of the Board of Directors following the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified.





No Executive Officer or Director of the Corporation has been the subject of any Order, Judgment, or Decree of any Court of competent jurisdiction, or any regulatory agency permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting him from acting as an investment advisor, underwriter, broker or dealer in the securities industry. Or as an affiliated person, director or employee of an investment company, bank, savings and loan association. Also an insurance company or from engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with any such activity or in connection with the purchase or sale of any securities.





No Executive Officer or Director of the Corporation has been convicted in any criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations) or is the subject of a criminal proceeding, which is currently pending.





No Executive Officer or Director of the Corporation is the subject of any pending legal proceedings.





Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance





Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To our knowledge, we believe that during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009 our Director and Chief Executive Officer did not comply with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.  Specifically, Mr. Timothy failed to file Form 3 for the year ended August 31, 2009, and Form 4s with respect to the issuance and sale of Common shares for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009.  In addition, an affiliate, Calbridge Capital, LLC, did not comply with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.  Specifically, Calbridge Capital, LLC failed to file Form 3s and 4s with respect to the issuance and sale of common shares for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009, and Form 4 for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2010.


19




Audit Committee





We do not have an Audit Committee, our board of directors acted as the Company's Audit Committee during fiscal 2010, recommending a firm of independent certified public accountants to audit the annual financial statements; reviewing the independent auditors' independence, the financial statements and their audit report; and reviewing management's administration of the system of internal accounting controls. The Company does not currently have a written audit committee charter or similar document.





Our board of directors has determined that if we were required to have a financial expert and/or an audit committee, Robert Timothy, our CEO, would be considered an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by applicable Commission rules and regulations. Based on the definition of “independent” applicable to audit committee members of Nasdaq-traded companies, our board of directors has further determined that Mr. Timothy is not considered to be “independent.”





Nominating Committee





We do not have a Nominating Committee or Nominating Committee Charter. Our board of directors performed some of the functions associated with a Nominating Committee. We have elected not to have a Nominating Committee in that we are continuously updating our operations and have limited resources with which to establish additional committees of our board of directors.





Compensation Committee





At this time, Mr. Timothy is the only member of the committee and has not needed to perform in this role due to the lack of establishing any compensation. The board of directors intends to add additional members to the compensation committee and expects it to consist solely of independent members.  Until more members are appointed to the compensation committee, our entire board of directors will review all forms of compensation provided to any new executive officers, directors, consultants and employees, including stock compensation and options.




ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION





The following table sets forth certain information relating to all compensation of our named executive officers for services rendered in all capacities to the Company during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:





Summary Compensation Table


Name and

Principal

Position

(a)
Fiscal Year

(b)

Salary

(c)


Stock

Awards

(e)(1)


Option

Awards

(f)(1)


All Other Compensation


Total

CompensationRobert Timothy, CEO (2)(3)
2010

$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-2009

$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-2008

$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-Ronald Schuurman, CFO
2010

$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-2009

$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-2008

$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-





(1) The amounts in columns (e) and (f) reflect the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, in accordance with FASB ASC 718-10-30-2 of awards of stock and stock options and thus include amounts from awards granted in and prior to 2010.  Assumptions used in the calculation of this amount are included in Note 3 of our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010 included in Part II, Item 7, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





(2) On October 20, 2009 the Company sold 8,980,000 founder’s shares of restricted common stock for $8,980. These shares were sold and, as such, not considered compensation.





(3) On August 20, 2009, the Company issued 25,340,000 shares of our common stock to Robert Timothy in consideration of equipment with a cost basis of $25,340, or $0.001 per share. These shares were exchanged for contributed assets and, as such, not considered compensation.





Employment Agreements





We have not entered into any employment agreements.  Our CEO, Robert Timothy, and our CFO, Ronald Schuurman, have worked without compensation and have no agreements to defer any compensation.




20





Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End





We have no outstanding equity awards, including common stock options.





Director Compensation




The table below summarizes the compensation that we paid to non-employee directors for the year ended August 31, 2010.




Name

(a)

Year

Stock Awards

($)

(c)


Option

Awards

($)

(d)


All Other Compensation

($)

(g)(1)


Total

($)

(h)Robert Timothy (1)(2)

2010

$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-Ronald Schuurman

2010

$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-


$
-0-





The amounts in columns (c) and (d) reflect the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the year ended August 31, 2010, in accordance with FASB ASC 718-10-30-2 of awards of stock and stock options and thus include amounts from awards granted in and prior to 2010.  Assumptions used in the calculation of this amount are included in Note 3 of our audited financial statements for the year ended August 31, 2010 included in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





(1) On October 20, 2009 the Company sold 8,980,000 founder’s shares of restricted common stock for $8,980. These shares were sold and, as such, not considered compensation.





(2) On August 20, 2009, the Company issued 25,340,000 shares of our common stock to Robert Timothy in consideration of equipment with a cost basis of $25,340, or $0.001 per share. These shares were exchanged for contributed assets and, as such, not considered compensation.




ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS





The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of the common and preferred stock as of August 31, 2010, by (i) each person who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of any classes of outstanding common stock, (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) each of the Chief Executive Officers and the executive officers (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”) and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.





The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Exchange Act, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under securities law, a person is considered a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares power to vote or direct the voting of such security or the power to dispose of such security. A person is also considered to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which the person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. We believe that each individual or entity named has sole investment and voting power with respect to the securities indicated as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws, where applicable, except where otherwise noted. Unless otherwise stated, the address of each person is disclosed in the table below.





This table is based upon information obtained from our stock records. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the above table and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe that each shareholder named in the above table has sole or shared voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned.





Name and Address

of Beneficial Holder
Shares of

Common Stock
Percentage of

Common Stock (7)Robert Timothy, 1890 South 3850 West

Salt Lake City, Utah 84104   (1)
34,200,000
59.8%Ronald Schuurman , 1890 South 3850 West

Salt Lake City, Utah 84104   (2)
-0-
0.0%Calbridge Capital, LLC., Steven Earlman,

3650 Jewel Cave Dr.  Las Vegas, Nevada 89122 (3)
1,154,500
2.0%SLC AIR, INC. Anthony Gallalizeau 2764 Lake Sierra Drive,

Suite #111 Las Vegas Nevada (4)
-0-
0.0%All executive officers and directors as a group.There is

one Director and two executive officers in the group
35,354,500
61.8%





21





ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE





During the year ended August 31, 2010, the Company received loans from the CEO, Robert Timothy, to fund operations in the total amount of $7,440.





Commencing October 1, 2009 the Company occupies 3,500 square feet of office space located at 1890 South 3850 West in Salt Lake City, State of Utah, 84104. This property is owned by the Companies President Robert Timothy’s mother and father DeVon Timothy and Robert Timothy.





The term of the lease is 60 months, beginning on the first day of September, 2010 and ending on the first day of October, 2015.  This location is now considered the primary location of the Company, rented on a 60 month basis at a rate of $1,995.00 per month. The company believes that the space is suitable to run its business for the next 60 months.





On August 20, 2009, the Company issued 8,980,000 shares of our common stock to Robert Timothy in consideration for $8,980, or $0.001 per share.  The proceeds of $8,980 were received on September 1, 2009.  As a result, a common stock subscription receivable of $8,980 was recognized as of August 31, 2009.





On August 20, 2009, the Company issued 25,340,000 shares of our common stock to Robert Timothy in consideration of equipment with a cost basis of $25,340, or $0.001 per share.  The cost basis approximates the fair market value of the equipment as of August 31, 2009.





As a result of Mr. Timothy’s two stock purchases he became the majority shareholder of the company and was elected the sole Director and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company on August 20, 2009.





On August 17, 2009, Joseph Scarpello sold 21,000,000 shares to Calbridge Capital for $25,000.





ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES





The following table shows the fees paid or accrued for the audit and other services provided by our independent auditors for August 31, 2010 and 2009.





August 31,

August 31,2010

2009Audit fees:M&K CPAS, PLLC
$
7,600

$
1,800Audit-related fees:M&K CPAS, PLLC

—


—Tax fees:

—


—All other fees:

—


—Total fees paid or accrued to our principal accountant
$
7,600

$
1,800





We do not have an Audit Committee.  Our board of directors acted as the Company's Audit Committee during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010, recommending a firm of independent certified public accountants to audit the annual financial statements; reviewing the independent auditors’ independence, the financial statements and their audit report; and reviewing management's administration of the system of internal accounting controls.




22




ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS.





Incorporated by referenceExhibit
Exhibit Description
Filed herewith
Form
Period

ending
Exhibit
Filing date3.1
Articles of Incorporation

S-1

3.1
02/19/103.2
Bylaws

S-1

3.2
02/19/103.3
Certificate of Designation

S-1

3.2
02/19/1010.1
Lease of Company property.

S-1

10.1
02/19/1031.1
Certification of Mr. Timothy pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
X32.1
Certification of Mr. Timothy pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
X




23




SIGNATURES




In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.






SPORT ENDURANCE, INC.By:
/s/ Robert TimothyRobert Timothy

Chief Executive Officer

Date: December 14, 2010