alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Fred A. THORN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-95.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 12, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of The Madison Square Garden Company (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys
Transition Report on Form 10-K/T for the transition period from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or §15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 26, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Robert M. Pollichino                            
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Robert M. Pollichino                                
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of
the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Massachusetts

Tribal Transportation Program 

Transportation Improvement Program

Tribal Transporation Program 

Transportation Improvement Program

State of

2023

This report includes all construction projects on current approved Tribal TIPs in this State.

1
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah)

Construction Year 2021

Type of Work Route Length Location County Funds Amount

Reconstruction 2321.10 0.1 Off Black Brook Road, Aquinnah, MA 007 - Dukes TTP; $55,000

Comments: requires the demolition of existing surface. PE complete

Delivery May Reconstruction

New Construction 2505.10 0.1 Aquinnah, MA 007 - Dukes TTP; $120,000

Comments: PE Complete

Loran Station Road Paving

2909.10, TTP;Tribe

2906.10, 

Reconstruction 0.1 Off Black Brook Road, Aquinnah, MA 007 - Dukes $582,000

Comments: $22k from Self-governance funds. PE complete

Maintenance Equipment Storage Facility

Total Amount for 2021 $757,000

2
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah)

Construction Year 2022

Type of Work Route Length Location County Funds Amount

On eligible TTP;

routes in 

Planning 1.8 various $115,000

Parking, signage, educational materials, landscaping & scenic enhancements, including any other allowable 

expenses.

On eligible routes in the inventory

Comments:

Recreation, tourism, and trails program

Total Amount for 2022 $115,000

Construction Year 2023

Type of Work Route Length Location County Funds Amount

6304.50, TTP;

etc/

New Construction 0.1 Aquinnah, MA 007 - Dukes $50,000

Comments: PE is complete. Construction is with gravel, no utilties

Old South Road Stabilization

Total Amount for 2023 $50,000

3
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cindy J. McPike, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 8, 2007



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    CINDY J.
MCPIKE                           
|Cindy J. McPike                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60532-60533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29530]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Silicon Integration Initiative, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 5, 1997, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Silicon Integration 
Initiative, Inc. (``SI2'') (formerly known as CAD Framework Initiative, 
Inc. (``CFI'')) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing certain 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Avant!, Sunnyvale, CA; and Chronology, Inc., Redmond, WA,

[[Page 60533]]

have become members of SI2. Advanced Micro Devices; Seiko Instruments; 
Ikos Systems; CNET-Grenoble; CPQD Telebras; Earl F. Ecklund; Nokolay 
Vitsyn; and Carl Hage, are no longer members of SI2.
    The purpose of SI2 has been amended to read as follows: ``Provide 
collaborative technology and services which enable higher levels of 
semiconductor design integration leading to industry accepted 
standards.''
    On December 30, 1988, SI2 filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. That filing was amended on February 7, 
1989. The Department of Justice published a notice concerning the 
amended filing in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 
Act on March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10456). A correction notice was published 
on April 20, 1989 (54 FR 16013).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 1, 1997. 
A notice as published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act on July 23, 1997 (62 FR 39549).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-29530 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: United  States, Alaska--south coast, Cook Inlet, East Foreland to Anchorage 
SuDocs Number:C 55.418/7:16663/
Item  Number: 0191-B-15 (online)
System  Number: 000871296
[if !vml]>[endif]>
16663-5-1990.jpg
2012-05-11 08:53
37M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
16663-5-1990.pdf
2012-05-14 12:51
37M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
16663-8-1986.jpg
2012-05-11 08:53
38M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
16663-8-1986.pdf
2012-05-14 12:50
38M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Thumbs.db
2012-05-14 12:51
17K
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 [if !supportMisalignedColumns]>   [endif]>  
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  July 6, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov
perm |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Simon Ridgway, Chief Executive Officer of Focus Ventures Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended November 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:    April 17, 2017





/s/ Simon Ridgway ____________________

Simon Ridgway,

Chief Executive Officer
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0267 SAT Date: 1/31/2014 Print Date: 3/19/2014

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 1 PMN 2 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; PMN negl; Hyd Pdt slow Keywords : Keywords: ONCO; MUTA; SENS-L,S; IRR-L,MM Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0267 FATE: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) S = Reacts Hydrolysis half-life = min VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = PMN 99 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 50-90 via sorption and possible p artial biodegTime for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt strong PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN negl; Hyd Pdt slow

Health : Health Summary: Absorption of low molecular weight fraction is poor all routes ( p che m ); expected to react, especially in the lung. Concern for oncogenicity based on mutagenicity based on ; respiratory and dermal sensitization and lung and mucous membrane irritation based on the

. Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value *
algal

_ chronic value *
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based onthe hydrolysis products and SARs for ; SAR chemical class = liquid with mp unknown (P); S = reacts(P); Log Kow > 8 (EPI, based on p redictions); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; low concern for toxicity;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) * SARs

SAR Class
Ecotox CategoryEcotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
#### WALSH v. WELSH.

No. 37968.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 214 So.2d 668.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

RICHARD DEPTULA, 

 

Non-Party Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

MCI, LLC, 

Petitioner Below, 

Appellee.

§ 

§ No. 304, 2019 

§ 

§ 

§ Court Below–Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ C.A. No. N18C-07-022 

§ 

§ 

§

 Submitted: August 14, 2019 

 Decided: August 15, 2019 

Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

ORDER 

 This 15th day of August 2019, upon consideration of the notice to show cause 

and the appellant’s response thereto, it appears to the Court that: 

(1) The appellant, Richard Deptula, filed this appeal from the Superior 

Court’s decision dated June 27, 2019, denying Deptula’s motion to quash a subpoena 

in a civil action. 

(2) The Clerk of this Court issued a notice to Deptula to show cause why 

his appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with Supreme Court 

Rule 42 in taking an appeal from an interlocutory order. Deptula filed a response to 

the notice to show cause, but it does not address the interlocutory nature of the 

appeal. 
2 

(3) An order constitutes a final judgment when it “leaves nothing for future 

determination or consideration.”1

 The Superior Court’s denial of a motion to quash 

a subpoena is an interlocutory ruling because did not finally resolve the merits of the 

underlying case.2

 

(4) Absent compliance with Supreme Court Rule 42, the appellate 

jurisdiction of this Court is limited to the review of final trial court orders.3

 

Deptula’s failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 leaves this Court without 

jurisdiction to hear his interlocutory appeal. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), 

that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Justice 

 

1 Werb v. D’Alessandro, 606 A.2d 117, 119 (Del. 1992). 

2 Id.

3 Julian v. State, 440 A.2d 990, 991 (Del. 1982).
EXHIBIT 33.1





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIAFOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





Entergy Texas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:





(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Transition Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), (4)(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), and (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);





(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;





(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2021, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and





(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.











---




Date:  March 28, 2022


Entergy Texas, Inc., as servicer


By: /s/ Steven C. McNeal





Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title:   Vice President and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Craig Brod, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Respect Your Universe, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Respect Your Universe, Inc.




Dated:  April 29, 2014




/s/ Craig BrodCraig BrodChief Executive Officer, President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)













A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Respect Your Universe, Inc. and will be retained by Respect Your Universe, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29908]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 28, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Pat Marshall, Manager of 
Analytical Support, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Michael Frank Maluccio, La Crescenta, California; Maluccio 
Company, Glendale, California; Nicholas J. Maluccio Trust, Glendale, 
Calfornia; and Malcor, Lancaster, California, parties acting in 
concert; to acquire voting shares of Verdugo Banking Company, Glendale, 
California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 7, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-29908 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
# L_2005307EN.01001901.xml

| 25.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 307/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 307/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1920/2005

of 24 November 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 13th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 13th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 39,374 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 November 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 November 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

2

---
#### Willie EASTERLING v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50239.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 1, 1978.

Dale, Hathorn & Clark, Charles L. Clark, Prentiss, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Karen Gil-foy, Asst. Atty.' Gen., and Frankie Walton White, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., BROOM and BOWLING, JJ., and W. W. BROWN, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.

INZER and SMITH, P. JJ., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER and LEE, JJ., concur.
#### Eddie WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Adult Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-657.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 8, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.