alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

MI-31 Zimowske Road Roadway Reconstruction U.S. Forest Service - Huron 

National Forest

Oscoda County 

Road 

Commisison

Oscoda 2016

MI-32 Highway 58 - Foster Street to 

Bay Street Roadway Reconstruction

National Park Service - 

Pictured Rocks National 

Lakeshore

City of Munising Alger 2016

MI-33 Highway 58 - Washignton 

Street to Connors Road Roadway Reconstruction

National Park Service - 

Pictured Rocks National 

Lakeshore

City of Munising Alger 2018

MI-40 Hart Road Roadway Reconstruction

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

- Shiawasse National 

Wildlife Refuge

Saginaw County 

Road 

Commission

Saginaw 2016

MI-41 Thousand Island Lake Road Roadway Reconstruction U.S. Forest Service - 

Ottawa National Forest

Gogebic County 

Road 

Commission

Gogebic 2016

MI-43 Iosco Exploration Trail Multi-use Trail U.S. Forest Service - Huron 

National Forest

Iosco County 

Road 

Commission

Iosco 2017

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Michigan Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Michigan FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Michigan Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2018

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The Michigan PDC does not have a firm date for the 

next Call for Projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. 

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
#### Robert Earl MOMAN (Morman) v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50521.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 12, 1978.

Mitchell M. Lundy, Grenada, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Karen Gil-foy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER and COFER, JJ.

REVERSED AND APPELLANT DISCHARGED.

SMITH and ROBERTSON, P. JJ., and SUGG, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.45 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Instrument Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the SLOVAK REPUBLIC 

Signed at Bratislava February 6, 2006 

with 

Annex 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Instrument signed at Bratislava February 6, 2006; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-13, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-13, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Instruments of Ratification at Washington 

 May 5, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010. 

With annex.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29772]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

The National Partnership Council

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Time and Date: 2:00 p.m., November 12, 1997.
    Place: OPM Conference Center, Room 1350, Theodore Roosevelt 
Building, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415-0001. The conference 
center is located on the first floor.
    Status: This meeting will be open to the public. Seating will be 
available on a first-come, first-served basis. Individuals with special 
access needs wishing to attend should contact OPM at the number shown 
below to obtain appropriate accommodations.
    Matters to be Considered: There will be a discussion of the 
National Partnership Council's strategic action plan for calendar year 
1998.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Michael Cushing, Director, Center 
for Partnership and Labor-Management Relations, Office of Personnel 
Management, Theodore Roosevelt Building, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 7H28, 
Washington, DC 20415-0001, (202) 606-2930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We invite interested persons and 
organizations to submit written comments. Mail or deliver your comments 
to Michael Cushing at the address shown above.

    Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 97-29772 Filed 11-6-97; 2:19 pm]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-P
```
#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. James P. HOYT, Jr., et ux.

No. 62324.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Court. Parish of Rapides. 357 So.2d 1189.

Writ denied.

DIXON and MARCUS, JJ., would grant on question of appraiser’s fees.
#### Harold LOWENSTEIN, Petitioner, v. Marcella LOWENSTEIN, Respondent.

No. 43566.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 26, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 273 So.2d 801.

i CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Anny SEIGEL, a widow, Appellant, v. MT. SINAI HOSPITAL OF GREATER MIAMI, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-1223.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 13, 1971.

*333Gershon S. Miller, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings and Frederick B. Hart, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ„ and SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-plaintiff seeks reversal of a final judgment entered pursuant to a directed verdict in favor of the appellee-de-fendant in an action wherein the appellee was sued for damages resulting from injuries sustained by appellant when she fell in the bathroom of appellee while she was there as a patient.

The point to be determined by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant at the close of plaintiff’s case on the ground that the evidence showed that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

The evidence as it appears from the record is that the plaintiff had used the bathroom prior to her fall. After leaving the bathroom she observed a woman employee of the hospital entering the bathroom carrying a bed pan filled with liquid which was emptied into the toilet. Plaintiff observed the employee coming out of the bathroom with the bed pan hanging down and dropping liquid on the floor from the bathroom into the bedroom. The employee then began to give plaintiff’s roommate a massage. Whereupon plaintiff left the room for a period of about one hour and forty-five minutes. Upon returning, she walked into the bathroom and fell. She thereupon discovered that the spot where she fell was wet.

We have carefully examined the evidence adduced at trial and have concluded that the trial judge erred in holding that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Whether or not plaintiff exercised reasonable care for her own safety was a question which should have been left for the jury to decide. Our review of the judgment has been in the light of the well established rule that requires the court, in considering the propriety of a directed verdict for the defendant, to evaluate the evidence offered in the cause in the light most favorablé to the plaintiff, and every intendment deductible from the evidence must be indulged in plaintiff’s favor. Rodi v. Florida Greyhound Lines, Fla.1953, 62 So.2d 355; Brightwell v. Beem, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 320; Franklin v. Dade County, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 730.

For the reasons stated the judgment appealed is reversed and remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

**FORM N-PX**

**ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF**

**DWS Short Duration Fund**

**A Series of DWS Investments Trust**

Investment Company Act file number  811-08006

DWS Investments Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

John Millette

Secretary

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA  02108-3106

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  617-295-1000

Date of fiscal year end:  10/31

Date of reporting period:  7/1/07-6/30/08

Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.

 
```

******************************* FORM N-Px REPORT *******************************

ICA File Number: 811-08006
Reporting Period: 07/01/2007 - 06/30/2008
DWS Investments Trust

========================= E    DWS SHORT DURATION FUND =========================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND

========== END NPX REPORT
```

 

----
No. 9689.

#### Fluhart *v.*Overholser et al.

(Decided October 23, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Montgomery County.

*Messrs. Van Deman, Burkhart & Shea,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. E. Thompson*and *Messrs. Mattern & Routzohn,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29531]



[[Page 60531]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Message Oriented Middleware Association 
(``MOMA'')

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 1997, pursuant to 
Sec. 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Message Oriented 
Middleware Association (``MOM'') filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Specifically, the following organizations have joined MOMA: BEA 
Systems, Rocky Hill, CT; Candle Corporation, W. Bloomfield, MI; Early, 
Cloud & Company, Middletown, RI; HUBLink, Inc., Columbus, OH; Dave 
Isherwood, Staten Island, NY; Liberty Mutual Insurance, Portsmouth, NJ; 
MINT Communications Systems, New York NY; Motorola, Inc., Schaumburg, 
IL; National City Corporation, Columbus, OH; SpaceWorks, Inc., 
Rockville, MD; Technology Investments, Tampa, FL; Vertex Industries, A 
NetWeave Business Unit, Philadelphia, PA; XING, Paris La Defense, 
France, ATB Associates has changed its name to ATB, Inc.
    The following organizations have withdrawn their membership from 
MOMA: Bell Sygma Systems Management, Suite Software, Tenektron Software 
Systems, and Touch Technology, Inc.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activities of MOMA. Membership remains open and MOMA intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 15, 1995, MOMA filed its original notification pursuant to 
Sec. 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in 
the Federal Register pursuant to Sec. 6(b) of the Act on November 13, 
1995 (60 FR 57022).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 25, 
1997. A notice was published in the Federal Register on May 19, 1997 
(62 FR 27278).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-29531 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 1417; Project No. 1835]


Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District Nebraska 
Public Power District; Notice Extending Deadline To Submit Final 
Biological Opinion

January 31, 1997.
    On December 4, 1996, the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and 
Wildlife Service (FWS), issued its draft biological opinion on 
threatened and endangered species for the relicensing of the Kingsley 
Dam Project No. 1417 and the North Platte/Keystone Diversion Dam 
Project No. 1835. The two hydropower projects are located on the North 
Platte, South Platte, and Platte Rivers in Nebraska. On December 17, 
1996, Commission staff participated in a meeting with FWS to discuss 
the draft biological opinion. Formal consultation on the draft opinion 
was completed at the conclusion of the December 17 meeting.\1\ FWS is 
required to deliver its final biological opinion to the Commission 
within 45 days after formal consultation is consulted, i.e., no later 
than January 31, 1997.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See the December 11, 1996 notice of public meeting 
(unpublished) issued in this proceeding.
    \2\ 50 CFR 402.14(e)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FWS has not submitted the final biological opinion as required. By 
letter January 14, 1997, FWS informed the Commission that it would not 
complete the final biological opinion until May 2, 1997, and asked the 
Commission to adopt its revised schedule.\3\ Given FWS's failure to 
meet the January 31, 1997 deadline and its January 14 letter setting 
out a revised schedule, an extension of the deadline for submitting the 
final biological opinion is warranted. The new deadline for the final 
biological opinion is May 2, 1997, as requested.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The applicants agree an extension is appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2930 Filed 2-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6233
FLOYD GLENN WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RICHARD A. LANHAM; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA95-989-DKC) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Floyd Glenn Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate j udge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for a certificate of appealability, deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Lanham , No. CA-95-989-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 30, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy , 117 S. Ct. 2059 (1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit (h)(11)

**ASSIGNMENT, CONSENT AND AMENDMENT AGREEMENT**

THIS ASSIGNMENT, CONSENT AND AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into on June 30, 2009, by and among DWS TARGET FUND, an open-end management investment company organized as a business trust under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (the “Trust”), on behalf of its series, DWS LIFECOMPASS PROTECT 2017 FUND (f/k/a DWS LifeCompass Protect Fund) (the “Fund”), DEUTSCHE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AMERICAS INC., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Adviser”), MERRILL LYNCH BANK USA, an industrial bank organized under the laws of the State of Utah (“Assignor”), andMAIN PLACE FUNDING, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (“Assignee”).

WHEREAS, Assignor, the Trust, on behalf of the Fund, and the Adviser are parties to a Financial Warranty Agreement dated November 1, 2007 (the “Financial Warranty Agreement”), an Escrow Agreement and certain additional Transaction Documents (as such term is defined in the Financial Warranty Agreement); and

WHEREAS, Assignor has issued a financial warranty to the Fund dated November 1, 2007 pursuant to the Financial Warranty Agreement (the “Assignor Financial Warranty”); and

WHEREAS, the Financial Warranty Agreement may be assigned pursuant to Section 8.2(a)(ii) of the Financial Warranty Agreement subject to the consent of the Fund and the Adviser; and

WHEREAS, Assignee is a separately incorporated subsidiary of Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) established pursuant to regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (12 C.F.R. Section 5.34) and existing in the form of a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware; and

WHEREAS, Assignor desires to assign its duties, right, title and interest to Assignee and Assignee desires to receive and assume all of the rights, interests, duties and obligations of Assignor under the Financial Warranty Agreement, the Escrow Agreement and such other Transaction Documents to which Assignor is a party; and

WHEREAS, Assignor desires to assign to Assignee, and Assignee desires to receive and accept, the benefits, if any, to which Assignor is entitled under the Instruction Agreement dated November 1, 2007 between the DWS Cash Management QP Trust and State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “QP Trust Agreement”) and the Custodian Instruction Letter and Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2007, among State Street Bank and Trust Company and the Trust, on behalf of the Fund (the “Custodian Instruction Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, Assignee, upon consummation of this Agreement, will issue a new financial warranty (the “Assignee Financial Warranty”) to the Trust, on behalf of the Fund, in full satisfaction of Assignee’s obligation to issue the Financial Warranty pursuant to the 

 

----
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-1126 

________________________________________________________________________ 

BOUNDARY WATERS 

 

 Minute No. 314 of the 

International Boundary and 

Water Commission, 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MEXICO 

Signed at Ciudad Juarez November 14, 2008 

and 

Agreement Extending the Minute No. 314 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington October 16 and November 2, 2009 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MEXICO 

Boundary Waters 

 Minute No. 314 of the International Boundary and 

 Water Commission, United States and Mexico. 

 Signed at Ciudad Juarez November 14, 2008; 

 Entered into force November 26, 2008. 

 And agreement extending Minute No. 314. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at Washington 

 October 16 and November 2, 2009; 

 Entered into force November 2, 2009.