alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Global Defense
Technology & Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James P. Allen, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |  |  |                             
|------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------
|              |  | 
|March 4, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ James P. Allen          
|              |  |  |  | James P. Allen              
|              |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and
|              |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer     

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
Docket No. FAA·2 01 C\- 

## i2 'DO Record of Ex Parte Contacts 

### ;10/0· ""<'V

)76· AP Directorate Identifier: -AD With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been dis~ussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manu.facturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, ete)? (You might need to submit aseparate record (0the Rules Docket. TheAD Manual defines "Ex PaTte Contacts. '') '.' ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE ATA 

### Joe V/hite 1211/2010 No response. 

### Boeing Paul Richter ] 1/19/2010 Concur,

Other!Additional Information:
Form Approved OMB NO. 2030-0020 Approval Expires 04/2012

LOBBYING AND LITIGATION CERTIFICATION FOR GRANTS 

AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS* 

INSTRUCTIONS: 

*At project completion, complete this form pursuant to the 2001 Department of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 

Development, and Independent Appropriations Act, Public Law 106-377, Section 424 and 2000 Department of Veterans 

Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Appropriations Act, Public Law 106-74, Section 426 and 

any other subsequent Appropriation Act requirements. 

Please mail this form to your EPA Grant Specialist within 90 days of project completion. DO NOT send this information 

to the Office of Management & Budget. 

Assistance Agreement Number(s): 

________________________________________ 

________________________________________ 

________________________________________ 

I hereby certify that none of these funds have been used to engage in the lobbying of the Federal 

Government or in litigation against the United States unless authorized under existing law. 

__________________________________________ ____________________________ 

Signature of the Chief Executive Officer Date 

__________________________________________ 

Print Name 

Burden Statement - The annual public reporting and record keeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 minutes per 

respondent. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide 

information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and 

systems for the purposes of collecting, validating and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing 

information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to 

a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the 

information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to , a collection of information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations are listed in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15. 

Send comments on the Agency’s need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for 

minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Regulatory Information Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Mail Code 3213A, Washington, DC 20460; and to the 

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk 

Officer for EPA. Include the EPA ICR number and OMB control number in any correspondence. 

EPA Form 5700-53 (Rev. 04/2012)
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**CFO Certification**

 

I, Roberto Luis Maestretti, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Pampa Energía S.A.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

  

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: April 27, 2012

 

 

 

----
CPP Lending Report

NAME OF INSTITUTION

(Including Holding Company Where Applicable) Person to be contacted regarding this report:

The Harbor Bank of Maryland (Harbor 

Bankshares Corporation)

Joseph Haskins, Jr.

UST Sequence Number: 1273

City: Baltimore

State: Maryland

RSSD:

(for Bank Holding Companies)

2008130

Holding Company Docket Number:

(for Thrift Holding Companies)

n/a

FDIC Certificate Number:

(for Depository Institutions)

24015

Loan Activity For: Apr, 2018

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance (Thousands $) 66,337

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance Key

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance Comment

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance (Thousands$) 146,887

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance Key

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance Comment

Total Outstanding Balance (Thousands $) 213,224

Total Outstanding Balance Key

Total Outstanding Balance Comment

General Market Commentary
#### Deborah A. Pascal, Appellant, v Amscan, Inc., Respondent.

[738 NYS2d 584]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for hostile work environment harassment in violation of Executive Law § 296 *et seq.,*the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated October 26, 2000, as granted those branches of the defendant’s motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the first and second causes of action asserted in the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the defendant’s motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the first and second causes of action, alleging that the defendant was liable for sexual harassment and a hostile work environment, respectively. After the defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant acquiesced in the alleged discriminatory conduct while it was occurring, or subsequently condoned it *(see, Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v St. Elizabeth’s Hosp.,*66 NY2d 684, 687; *Matter of Totem Taxi v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 65*NY2d 300, 305). Moreover, the alleged perpetrator of the harassment was not of such a high rank in the company as to invoke the rule of imputed liability for his actions *(cf., Matter of Father Belle Community Ctr. v New York State Div. of Human Rights,*221 AD2d 44, 53). Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Friedmann and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
| FOREX INTERNATIONAL TRADING CORP M.S. LTD |   |   |   |   |   | Israel       |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------------|--------|--------|
| Triple 8 Limited                          |   |   |   |   |   | Cyprus (1)   |   |   |
| Forex New York City LLC                   |   |   |   |   |   | New York (2) |   |   |
| Wheatley Asset Management LLC             |   |   |   |   |   | New York (2) |   |   |

| (1)   | Forex International Trading Corp. owns approximately 50% of the issued securities of Triple 8 Limited |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | Forex International Trading Corp. owns approximately 50% of the issued securities |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
WILLIAM M. CURLEY, P.C. 

Lawyer 

507 N. Church Street 

Palestine, Tx 75801 

Tel: (903) 723-6757 

Fax: (903) 727-0554

May 13, 2015 

Twelfth Court of Appeals 

Cathy S. Lusk 

1517 W. Front Street, Ste. 354 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

RE: Case Number: 12-13-00333-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 12CR-115 

Style: Wilbert Walker v. The State of Texas; in the Twelfth Court of Appeals 

Dear Ms. Lusk: 

I certify that I have complied with T.R.A.P. 48.4 in this cause. Attached please 

find a copy of the return receipt as required by the rule. I have also attached a copy of the 

USPS tracking as of May 12, 2015.

 Sincerely, 

 

 William M. Curley 

Enclosure 

ACCEPTED

12-13-00333-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

5/13/2015 12:04:05 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 5/13/2015 12:04:05 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: United  States, Hawaiian Islands 
SuDocs Number:[if !vml]>[endif]>C 55.418/7:540/
Item Number:0191-B-14  (online)
System  Number: 000871828
[if !supportLists]>·       [endif]>540-4-1980.jpg
 
 
 
[if !supportLists]>·       [endif]>540-4-1980.pdf
 
 
 
[if !supportLists]>·       [endif]>540-6-1978.jpg
 
 
 
[if !supportLists]>·       [endif]>540-6-1978.pdf
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  July 6, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov
perm |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 00-870.

#### Tittus *v.*NationsBank of Texas, N. A., et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Proteonomix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert Kohn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert Kohn

Robert Kohn

Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 26, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-2000             JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-2000             MAR-28-1999
<CASH>                                          20,311                  14,973
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,175                  53,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,730                   3,180
<INVENTORY>                                     16,647                  17,460
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,361                 100,782
<PP&E>                                         191,590                 181,209
<DEPRECIATION>                                 116,412                 116,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 369,446                 385,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,128                 114,719
<BONDS>                                        275,000                 275,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (474,369)               (483,508)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   369,446                 385,138
<SALES>                                        233,155                 228,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               266,918                 260,768
<CGS>                                          128,441                 131,192
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  195,055                 192,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,121                  50,429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   200                     447
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,939                  17,138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,803                     381
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,756                     152
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,047                     229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,047                     229
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 20 14 - 0499 Directorate ID : 20 13 - SW - 061 - AD Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model 430 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 5 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : This AD ’s actions are intended to prevent failure of a control tube bonded clevis , which could lead to failure of the control tube and subsequent loss of helicopter control. Costs: We estimate that labor costs average $85 a work hour. Based on this estimate, we expect the following costs:

 The cost of inspecting the control tube is minimal.

 Repairing the control tube require s 2 work- hours for a labor cost of $170.

 Replacing control tube, P/N 430 - 001 - 007 - 101, with control tube, P/N 430 - 0 01 - 007 - 105, require s 3 work- hours for a labor cost of $255. Parts cost $3,974 for a total cost per helicopter of $4,229. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Matt Fuller
($ millions)

Date Number of

Respondents

Total Average

Consumer Loans

Total Average

Commercial Loans

Total Average

Loans

6/30/2017 3 $563 $316 $879

7/31/2017 2 $98 $306 $404

8/31/2017 3 $590 $318 $908

9/30/2017 3 $587 $319 $906

10/31/2017 3 $592 $320 $912

11/30/2017 3 $583 $320 $902

12/31/2017 3 $580 $319 $899

1/31/2018 2 $553 $151 $705

2/28/2018 2 $67 $145 $212

3/31/2018 2 $556 $155 $711

4/30/2018 2 $66 $147 $213

5/31/2018 (adjusted) 1 $66 $148 $214

5/31/2018 2 $545 $157 $702

6/30/2018 (adjusted) 1 $66 $149 $215

6/30/2018 1 $66 $149 $215

‐0.86% 1.07% 0.47%

Note: See attached "reporting groups" table

Summary of CPP Monthly Lending Report Data

All CPP Monthly Lending Report Filers

Change from May (adj) to June (adj)
Date Data Includes Excludes1, 2

6/30/2017 6/30/17 data received by 7/31/17 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 6

7/31/2017 7/31/17 data received by 8/31/17 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 7

8/31/2017 8/31/17 data received by 9/30/17 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 8

9/30/2017 9/30/17 data received by 10/31/17 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 9

10/31/2017 10/31/17 data received by 11/30/17 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 

11/30/2017 11/30/17 data received by 12/31/17 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 

12/31/2017 12/31/17 data received by 1/31/18 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 

1/31/2018 1/31/18 data received by 2/28/18 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 

2/28/2018 2/28/18 data received by 3/31/18 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 2

3/31/2018 3/31/18 data received by 4/30/18 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 3

4/30/2018 4/30/18 data received by 5/31/18 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 3

5/31/2018 5/31/18 data received by 6/30/18 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 4

5/31/2018

(Adjusted)

5/31/18 data received by

6/30/18

Institutions that reported both 4/30/18 data and 5/31/18

(using consistent reporting methodology)

Institutions that did not report both 4/30/18 da

(using consistent reporting methodology)

6/30/2018 6/30/18 data received by 7/31/18 All Funded Institutions Institutions that repaid CPP funds on or before 5

6/30/2018

(Adjusted)

6/30/18 data received by

7/31/18

Institutions that reported both 5/31/18 data and 6/30/18

(using consistent reporting methodology)

Institutions that did not report both 5/31/18 da

(using consistent reporting methodology)

CPP Monthly Lending Report: Reporting Groups

1. All reporting groups exclude institutions that did not submit a conforming CPP Monthly Lending Report by the reporting deadline.

2. Beginning with September 20, 2010 data, CPP institutions that exchanged into the CDCI program no longer submit CPP Monthly Lending Reports.