alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# October 2008 - March 2012
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28734]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 58704]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Colorado Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Colorado Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 3:30 p.m. on Friday, December 5, 1997, at the Mile 
High Center, 1700 Broadway, Suite 490, Denver, Colorado 80290. The 
purpose of the meeting is to discuss followup activities to the Fort 
Collins community forum and plan future forums in Colorado.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Joseph Arcese, 
303-556-3139, or John Dulles, Director of the Rocky Mountain Regional 
Office, 303-866-1400 (TDD 303-866-1049). Hearing-impaired persons who 
will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, October 21, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-28734 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tasco International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Adrienne Humphreys, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
10th day of February 2005


/s/ Adrienne Humphreys
-----------------------------
Adrienne Humphreys
Chief Financial Officer
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Bryan Staten-Jackson, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appellate Advocates (Bryan D. Kreykes of counsel), for appellant.Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Sharen D. Hudson, J.), imposed August 10, 2015, upon his conviction of criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty.</p><p>ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.</p><p>Defendant was charged in an accusatory instrument with criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree (Penal Law ยง 221.10 [1]) and unlawful possession of marihuana (Penal Law ยง 221.05). On November 26, 2013, defendant, who was incarcerated at the time, agreed to plead guilty to criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree in satisfaction of the accusatory instrument and in exchange for an eight month Misdemeanor Brooklyn Treatment Court (MBTC) mandate to complete a drug treatment program, with a jail alternative sentence of 90 days. On August 10, 2015, the Criminal Court pronounced a sentence of four months' imprisonment to be served by defendant concurrently with sentences imposed on three other matters. On appeal, defendant contends, among other things, that since he pleaded guilty to criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree, a class B misdemeanor, the maximum sentence of imprisonment which the court could have imposed could not have exceeded three months (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 70.15 [2]). Therefore, he argues that the four-month sentence imposed was not lawful. </p><p>Defendant's challenges to the sentence imposed has been rendered academic because he has already fully served the sentence (<i>see People v McLaine</i>, 64 NY2d 934 [1985]; <i>People v Elgut</i>, 164 AD3d 1360 [2018]; <i>People v Vielman</i>, 164 AD3d 623 [2018];<i> People v Cole</i>, 144 AD3d 699 [2016]; <i>cf. People v Ayala</i>, 142 AD3d 1095 [2016] [finding that, although the defendant had served his sentence, the question of whether the sentence imposed should be reduced was not academic, because the sentence imposed had potential immigration consequences]).</p><p>Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: January 04, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric E. Parsons, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: | August 8, 2006
|------ | --------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/    ERIC E. PARSONS                         
|Eric E. Parsons                                
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 10418.

#### The State, ex rel. McClelland, *v.*Harris, Governor, et al.

(Decided December 11, 1906.)

Mandamus.

*610
      *Mr. J. M. Sheets; Mr. C. R. Painter*and *Mr. J. 0. Troup,*for relator.

*Mr. Wade H. Ellis, attorney-general; Mr. W. H. Miller*and *Mr. Cyrus Huling,*for respondents.

Demurrer sustained and petition dismissed on authority of *State*v. *Brewster,*39 Ohio St., 653.

Price, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.

Spiauck, C. J., and Crew, J.,

concur in the judgment upon the ground that the form of ballot furnished by the board of elections can not be questioned after the election if the voters’ intention clearly appears, in which view Price and Spear, JJ., also concur.
#### WILLIAMS & REED, INC. v. CHASE.

No. 39242.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 23, 1970.

Appeals dismissed without opinion. 227 So.2d 75.
# L_2006079EN.01003201.xml

| 16.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 79/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 79/32

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 of 27 June 2005 concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 200 of 30 July 2005
  )

On page 10, Annex I, List of authorities referred to in Articles 8 and 11, point A. Authorities of the Member States, under ‘Cyprus’, address in Greek language:

for:

‘Τμήμα έκδοσηs αδειών εισαγωγών/εξαγωγών’,

read:

‘Μονάδα Έκδοσης Aδειών Eισαγωγών/Eξαγωγών’;

for:

‘E-mail: perm.sec@mcit.gov.cygr’,

read:

‘E-mail: perm.sec@mcit.gov.cy’.

On page 16, in Annex V, ‘Export or import authorisation form referred to in Article 9(1)’, in the vertical area reading up the page to the left of boxes 1, 2, 5 and 9 insert:

‘AUTHORISATION EXPORT/IMPORT TORTURE EQUIPMENT’.

On page 18, ‘Explanatory notes to the form’, in Box 3, third column:

for:

‘See Article 2(d) and (e) and Article 17 of the Regulation ...’,

read:

‘See Article 2(d) and (e) and Article l8 of the Regulation...’;

and in Boxes 6 and 7, third column:

for:

‘See Commission Regulation (EC) No 1779/2002 (OJ L 296, 5.10.2002, p. 6)’,

read:

‘See Commission Regulation (EC) No 1779/2002 (OJ L 269, 5.10.2002, p. 6)’.

---
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable James K. Singleton, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. JOHN NANCE, Defendant - Appellant. No. 09-50314 D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00795-RGK-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted August 6, 2010 Pasadena, California Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, WARD LAW, Circuit Judge, and SINGLETON, Senior District Judge. ** John Nance appeals his conviction for possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and challenges his sentence on both 

# FILED
AUG 23 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 procedural and substantive grounds. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. The district court did not err in denying Mr. Nance’s motion to suppress. Because Mr. Nance was not in custody at th e time of his interrogation, there was no requirement that the agents read him his Miranda rights. See United States v. Brobst , 558 F.3d 982, 995 (9th Cir. 2009). A reasonable person in Mr. Nance’s position would have felt free to terminate the encounter with the law enforcement agents, given the totality of the circumstances. See United States v. Craighead , 539 F.3d 1073, 1082 (9th Cir. 2008). After law enforcement agents asked if they could speak with him, Mr. Nance invited th em into his trailer and agreed to answer questions. At no point did the agents e ffect a “police-domin ated” atmosphere. Id. at 1084. The tone of the questioning was open and cordial; the agents never brandished the weapons concealed beneath their windbreakers, or confronted Mr. Nance with evidence of his guilt. See United States v. Bassignani , 575 F.3d 879, 884–85 (9th Cir. 2009). Mr. Nance wasn’t placed in handcuffs or otherwise physically restrained or threatened. Id. at 886; Brobst , 558 F.3d at 996. Moreover, the agents took no action to isolate Mr. Nance or apply any pressure on him to confess. Craighead , 589 F.3d at 1086–87.3 The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a 60 month sentence. See United States v. Autery , 555 F.3d 864, 871 (9th Cir. 2009). Mr. Nance employed file sharing software to actively search out over a thousand pictures and videos—many depicting me n engaged in explicit sexual acts with prepubescent children. The district court recognized the seriousness of the offense and committed no procedural error in impos ing the enhancements called for by the Guidelines. See United States v. Blinkinsop , 606 F.3d 1110, 1117–18 (9th Cir. 2010). To the extent that Mr. Nance’s age, health, lack of criminal history, and acceptance of responsibility mitigate the serious ness of the crime, the district court expressly and reasonably considered these factors by imposing a sentence 18 months below the low end of the advisory Guidelines range. AFFIRMED.
# L_2005194EN.01000801.xml

| 26.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 194/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 194/8

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1195/2005

of 25 July 2005

amending Regulation (EC) No 214/2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards intervention on the market in skimmed-milk powder

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 21 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 214/2001 (2) limited the quantity of skimmed-milk powder put up for sale by the Member States’ intervention agencies to that taken into storage before 1 September 2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 21 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 214/2001 (2) limited the quantity of skimmed-milk powder put up for sale by the Member States’ intervention agencies to that taken into storage before 1 September 2004.

| (2) | In view of the quantity still available and the market situation, that date should be amended to 1 July 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the quantity still available and the market situation, that date should be amended to 1 July 2005.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 214/2001, ‘1 September 2004’ shall be replaced by ‘1 July 2005’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 July 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 37, 7.2.2001, p. 100. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

2

---
Docket Index

EPA

- R10

- OAR

- 2013

- 0247

DOC # DATE FROM TO SUBJECT

101a

- h 3/11/13 Curt Fransen, IDEQ Dennis McLerran, EPA Letter of Submittal and Norther n Ada County PM 10 SIP, Maintenance Plan 2 nd ten year update ; Appendices A

- F

101i 4/4/13 David Luft, IDEQ Lucy Edmondson, EPA Corrected page from Appendix D

– new table 7

- 9, page 7

- 17

101j 4/16/13 David Luft, IDEQ Lucy Edmondson, EPA Modified Table 9 and 10 from Section 5.3 MVEB

201a

- b 9/23/13 Tiffany Floyd, IDEQ Kate Kelly, EPA Request for EPA Concurrence as Exceptional Events for the February 15

– 16, 2011, High Wind PM10 Dust Event and submittal

201c 12/13/13 Dennis McLerran, EPA Curt Fransen, IDEQ EPA Concurrence on IDEQ’s Exceptional Event flags for Feb 15 and 16, 2011

301a 7/13/95 Wallace Cory, IDEQ Chuck Clarke, EPA Pinehurst PM10 Air Quality Improvement Plans

– Contingency Measure revisions
February 11, 2013

Memorandum to the Montana Regional Haze FIP File

Docket ID # EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0851

Subject: Conservation Group Comments, Availability of DVD

From: Gail Fallon, Environmental Engineer

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8

We are including this memorandum in the docket after the promulgation of our final rule to 

clarify the availability of a DVD that we received with comments from the Montana 

Environmental Information Center, the National Parks Conservation Association and the Sierra 

Club. These comments were submitted via an Earthjustice cover letter dated June 18, 2012 

(Attachment 5 to EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0851-0187). The collection of voluminous exhibits on 

the DVD is included in the Docket for this rulemaking and is available from the Region upon 

request.
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS RREEF Real Estate Fund II, Inc., on Form N-CSR; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| February 29, 2008 | /s/Michael G. Clark                 |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------|
|              | Michael G. Clark                    |
|              | President                           |
|              | DWS RREEF Real Estate Fund II, Inc. |

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS RREEF Real Estate Fund II, Inc., on Form N-CSR; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| February 29, 2008 | /s/Paul Schubert                      |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------|
|              | Paul Schubert                         |
|              | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|              | DWS RREEF Real Estate Fund II, Inc.   |
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130889 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MATTHEW S. ENGLISH,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130889 

 COA: 255956 

St. Clair CC: 03-000496-NI 

CONNIE HIMMEL-THOMPSON, 

Personal Representative of the Estate of

JEFFREY HIMMEL, Deceased,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0821 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 29, 2006 

 Clerk
CERTIFICATIONS




I, Paul
C. Honda, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K
of  Honda Auto Receivables 2009-3 Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act
periodic reports”);





2. Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am
responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on
my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer
compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,
and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
respects; and





5. All
the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in
this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.





In
giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  FDI Computer
Consulting Inc., dba FDI Collateral Management and Citibank, N.A.











Date:  June
28, 2010











/s/ Paul C.
Honda_____________________________


Paul C.
Honda


Assistant
Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Compliance Officer


of
American Honda Finance Corporation


(senior
officer in charge of the servicing function)