alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005240EN.01003701.xml

| 16.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 240/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 240/37

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1496/2005

of 15 September 2005

amending Regulation (EC) No 1168/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of maize held by the Austrian intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1168/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of 113 297 tonnes of maize held by the Austrian intervention agency. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1168/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of 113 297 tonnes of maize held by the Austrian intervention agency.

| (2) | Given the current market situation, the quantities of maize put up for sale by the Austrian intervention agency on the internal market should be increased, taking the permanent invitation to tender to 121 525 tonnes. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Given the current market situation, the quantities of maize put up for sale by the Austrian intervention agency on the internal market should be increased, taking the permanent invitation to tender to 121 525 tonnes.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 1168/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 1168/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1168/2005 is hereby amended as follows:

| 1. | in Article 1, ‘113 297 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘121 525 tonnes’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

in Article 1, ‘113 297 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘121 525 tonnes’;

| 2. | In the title of the Annex, ‘113 297 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘121 525 tonnes’. |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the title of the Annex, ‘113 297 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘121 525 tonnes’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 188, 20.7.2005, p. 16.

2

---
# L_2005187EN.01003001.xml

| 19.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 187/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 187/30

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1129/2005 14 July 2005 laying down the reduction coefficient to be applied under the tariff quota for corn opened by Regulation (EC) No 958/2003

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 184 of 15 July 2005
  )

On the second page of the contents and on page 41, in the title, recital 1 and Article 1:

for:

‘... corn ...’,

read:

‘... wheat ...’.

---
#### Douglas Owen TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40975.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 22, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed. 243 So.2d 167.

ROBERTS, C. *].,*and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
# L_2005170EN.01004401.xml

| 1.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 170/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 170/44

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1015/2005

of 30 June 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 31st partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Sugar has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Sugar has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 31st partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 37,970 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1634 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1634

 To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to prohibit voting systems 
  used to administer elections for Federal office from containing any 
                          wireless components.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2021

   Mr. Gibbs (for himself, Mr. Perry, Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio, and Mrs. 
   McClain) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to prohibit voting systems 
  used to administer elections for Federal office from containing any 
                          wireless components.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Wireless Installations in Federal 
Instruments for Voting Act'' or the ``No WIFI Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING VOTING SYSTEMS FROM CONTAINING WIRELESS COMPONENTS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 301(a) of the Help America Vote Act of 
2002 (52 U.S.C. 21081(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(7) Prohibiting wireless components.--The voting system 
        may not contain any wireless components.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to elections held during 2022 or any succeeding 
year.
                                 <all>
```
#### McClinton ISAAC, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-945.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### CITY GAS COMPANY OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation, and Dade Gas Company, a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. Robert I. BRENNER and Weeks Bottlegas & Appliance Company, a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 69-5.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 23, 1969.

Dubbin, Schiff, Berkman & Dubbin, Miami, for appellants.

Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston, Dunwody & Cole, and George W. Wright, Jr., Karl B. Block, Jr., Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Pure Foods, Inc. v. Sir Sirloin, Inc., Fla.1955, 84 *441So.2d 51; Renpak, Inc. v. Oppenheimer, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 642; Yoo-Hoo of Florida Corp. v. Catroneo; Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 220.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1468

DERRICK SALLIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Spartanburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (7:19-cv-00320-TMC)

Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: October 20, 2020

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Sallis, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Sallis seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate 

judge’s recommendation and dismissing Sallis’ civil action. We dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its final order on March 2, 2020. Sallis filed the notice of 

appeal on April 6, 2020. Because Sallis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain 

an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny his motion for a stay and dismiss 

the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Helene LODDING, Appellant, v. Woodrow LODDING, Appellee.

No. 70-894.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 11, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
DWS VARIABLE SERIES II

          SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES OF EACH OF
                             THE LISTED PORTFOLIOS:

                                -----------------

                          DWS Janus Growth & Income VIP
                           DWS Davis Venture Value VIP

The Board of each portfolio noted above has given preliminary approval to a
proposal by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA"), the advisor
of each portfolio, to effect the following portfolio mergers:

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acquired Portfolios                      Acquiring Portfolios
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DWS Janus Growth & Income VIP            DWS Variable Series I: DWS Capital Growth VIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DWS Davis Venture Value VIP              DWS Variable Series II: DWS Large Cap Value VIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

Completion of each merger is subject to a number of conditions, including final
approval by a portfolio's Board and approval by shareholders of the Acquired
Portfolios at a shareholder meeting expected to be held on or about the first
quarter of 2009. Prior to the shareholder meeting, you and your insurance
company will receive: (i) a proxy statement/prospectus describing in detail the
proposed merger and the Board's considerations in recommending that shareholders
approve the merger; and (ii) a prospectus for the applicable Acquiring
Portfolio. You will also receive a voting instruction form and instructions on
how to submit your voting instructions to your insurance company. Your insurance
company, as shareholder, will actually vote the shares corresponding to your
investment (likely by executing a proxy card) once it receives your voting
instructions.














               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference


December 1, 2008
st-VS_merger
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHANCE MCCLAIN ESQ., Third Party, and DOMINIQUE M. BARTEET

, Appellant s ,

v.

GEORGE J. JANSSEN

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 0978

[ March 15, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Dana M. Santino , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502016CA005039XXXXMB

.

Chance McClain of Law Office of Chance McClain, Lake Park, for appellant Dominique M. Barteet.

Jason Ari Smith and Michael P. Hamaway of Mombach, Boyle, Hard in & Simmons, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee George J. Janssen.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., M AY and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### ARROW BEEF CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. SOUTH ATLANTIC & CARIBBEAN LINES, INC., Appellee.

No. 72-1395.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 10, 1973.

Fink & Syna, Miami, for appellant.

Fowler, White, Humkey, Burnett, Hurley & Banick, and William B. Milliken, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The major point on this appeal is whether the parties1 to a bill of lading may therein agree to be bound by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act [46 U.S.C.A. § 1300 et seq.] regarding a limitation of actions *44provision of one year2 for losses or damages to the cargo. We note the provision of 46 U.S.C.A. § 1312 stating, inter alia:

> “Nothing in this chapter shall he held to apply to contracts for carriage of goods by sea between any port of the United States or its possessions, and any other port of the United States or its possessions : *Provided, however, That any bill of lading or similar document of title which is evidence of a contract for the carriage of goods by sea between such ports, containing an express statement that it shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter, shall be subjected hereto as fully as if subject hereto by the express provisions of this chapter:"*[Emphasis supplied.]

In the case sub judice, the bill of lading entered into between the contracting parties falls within the above-emphasized provision of the statute and the trial judge correctly ruled that the one year limitation of action within the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act precluded appellant’s counterclaim, notwithstanding the provisions of § 9S.03, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.3 Coquette Originals, Inc. v. Canadian Gulf Line of Florida, Fla.App. 1970, 240 So.2d 847; Foresman v. Eastern Steamship Corp., Fla.App. 1965, 177 So.2d 887.

Moreover, upon careful consideration of the additional point raised by appellant and the point on cross-appeal raised by appel-lee, we have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated by either party in these regards. Accordingly, the order and final judgment appealed and cross-appealed from are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. It appears from the pleadings and record that appellant was the assignee of one of the parties to the bill and, therefore, bound by its terms.

2

. 46 U.S.C.A. § 1303(6).

3

. § 95.03, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. provides:

> “All provisions and stipulations contained in any contract whatever . . . fixing the period of time in which suits may be instituted under any such contract, or upon any matter growing out of the provisions of any such contract, at a period of time less than that provided by the statute of limitations of this state, are hereby declared to be contrary to the public policy of this state, and to be illegal and void. No court in this state shall give effect to any provision or stipulation of the character mentioned in this section.”
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1606 

To amend the Child Abuse and Prevention Act to require a study and 

report on marital age of consent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2021 

Mr. TAYLOR (for himself, Mr. MORELLE, and Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Abuse and Prevention Act to require 

a study and report on marital age of consent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘End Forced Child Mar5 riages Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT ON MARITAL AGE OF CON7 SENT. 

8 Section 110 of the Child Abuse Prevention and 

9 Treatment Act (42 U.S.C. 5106f) is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1606 IH

1 ‘‘(e) STUDY AND REPORT ON MARITAL AGE OF CON2 SENT.— 

3 ‘‘(1) STUDY.—The Secretary shall study, with 

4 respect to each State— 

5 ‘‘(A) the State law regarding the minimum 

6 marriage age; and 

7 ‘‘(B) the prevalence of marriage involving 

8 a child who is under the age of such minimum 

9 marriage age. 

10 ‘‘(2) FACTORS.—The study required under 

11 paragraph (1) shall include an examination of— 

12 ‘‘(A) the extent to which any statutory ex13 ceptions to the minimum marriage age in such 

14 laws contribute to the prevalence of marriage 

15 involving a child described in paragraph (1)(B); 

16 ‘‘(B) whether such exceptions allow such a 

17 child to be married without the consent of such 

18 child; and 

19 ‘‘(C) the impact of such exceptions on the 

20 safety of such children. 

21 ‘‘(3) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the 

22 date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary 

23 shall submit to the Committee on Health, Edu24 cation, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the 

25 Committee on Education and Labor of the House of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1606 IH

1 Representatives a report containing the findings of 

2 the study required by this subsection, including any 

3 best practices.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Rufus BARNES, Respondent.

No. 44225.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 24, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 280 So.2d 46.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Andatee China Marine Fuel Services Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, An Fengbin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for said period.





/s/ An FengbinAn Fengbin, Chief Executive Officer




Date:  March 31, 2011




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1767 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Defense Language 

Institute to award a Bachelor of Arts degree in a foreign language, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2021 

Mr. PANETTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the 

Defense Language Institute to award a Bachelor of Arts 

degree in a foreign language, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense Language Im5 provement Act’’ or the ‘‘DLI Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1767 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFENSE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE FOREIGN LAN2 GUAGE CENTER. 

3 (a) AUTHORITY TO AWARD BACHELOR’S DE4 GREES.—Section 2168 of title 10, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘Asso7 ciate’’ and inserting ‘‘Associate or Bachelor’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by amending subsection (a) to read as fol10 lows: 

11 ‘‘(a) Subject to subsection (b), the Commandant of 

12 the Defense Language Institute may confer— 

13 ‘‘(1) an Associate of Arts degree in a foreign 

14 language upon any graduate of the Foreign Lan15 guage Center of the Institute who fulfills the re16 quirements for that degree; or 

17 ‘‘(2) a Bachelor of Arts degree in a foreign lan18 guage upon any graduate of the Foreign Language 

19 Center of the Institute who fulfills the requirements 

20 for that degree.’’. 

21 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

22 at the beginning of chapter 108 of title 10, United States 

23 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 

24 2168 and inserting the following new item: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1767 IH

‘‘2168. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center: degree of Associate or Bachelor of Arts in foreign language.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Proteonomix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert Kohn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael Cohen

Michael Cohen

Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 29, 2011