alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of --

THR Enterprises, Inc. 

Under Contract No. F44600-03-D-0001 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 59706, 59810 

David A. Hearne, Esq. 

ReavesColey PLLC 

Chesapeake, VA 

Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. 

Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney 

Danielle A. Runyan, Esq. 

Christopher M. Judge, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE O'CONNELL 

It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties' stipulation and agreement, that the appeals are sustained. In the nature of a 

consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of 

$410,000.00. This amount is inclusive of interest. No further interest shall be paid. 

Dated: June 17, 2019 

I concur 

OWEN 

~-

C. WILSON 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

'J1J~,~W1J. OC,~ 

MICHAEL N. O'CONNELL 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

J.lOPROUTY 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59706, 59810, Appeals of 

THR Enterprises, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

PA ULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28860]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-957-1430-00]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey; Idaho

    The plat of the following described land was officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9:00 a.m. October 23, 1997.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
north boundary, subdivisional lines and boundaries of certain mineral 
surveys, and the retracement of the northerly side line of Main Street 
through the townsite of Murray, Idaho, and the survey of certain new 
lots in section 5, T. 49 N., R. 5 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group 951, 
was accepted October 23, 1997.
    This survey was executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Bureau of Land Management. All inquiries concerning the survey of 
the above described land must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, 
Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 South Vinnell Way, 
Boise, Idaho, 83709-1657.

    Dated: October 23, 1997.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 97-28860 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-66-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61103-61104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29946]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-886-001]


Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners, L.P.; Notice of Filing

November 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 30, 1997, Brooklyn Navy Yard 
Cogeneration Partners, L.P. tendered for filing its compliance filing 
in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the, Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before November 21, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the

[[Page 61104]]

commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29946 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Charles H. BLANCHARD, doing business as Blanchard Construction Company, and Russell G. Patterson & Associates, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. CONTINENTAL MORTGAGE INVESTORS, a Massachusetts business trust, The Ben White Corporation, a Florida corporation, Ben W. White and Frances C. White, husband and wife, and Commercial National Bank of Pensacola, a national banking corporation, Appellees.

No. N-149.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.
2005 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 12-27-2005 

# U SA v . Ro dri gue z P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 04-1801

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2005 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" U SA v . Rodr i guez " (2005). 2005 D e cisio n s . P ape r 49. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005/49U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT O ct ober18, 2005
N o. 04- 1801 U ni t ed St at es of

A m eri ca vs. M i gue l R odr i gue z , A ppe l l ant ( D i s t ri ct of

N ew Jers ey C ri m i nal N o. 01- cr- 00021- 5)
P R E S E N T : R O T H , M cK E E an d F ISH E R , C i rcu i t Jud ges.

L e tter d a ted 1 0 /1 7 /0 5 f

ro m c o u n se l f

o r A p p e llee , w h ich th e C o u rt m a yw ish to cons t rue as a mot i on t o amend t he opi ni on.

A nsw er due 10/ 31/ 05 T ony a W y che 267- 299- 4938 O pi ni on & Judgm ent ent ere d 10/ 14/ 05 C as e M anage r M andate due t o i s s ue 11/ 7/ 05 O R D E R T he for egoi ng m ot i on t o amend t he opi ni on i s gr ant ed. B yth e C o u rt, / s/ D
. Mi cha elF isher C i r cui tJ udge D at ed: D ece m ber27, 2005 t yw / cc: M i t chel l I gnat off, E s q. M ar k E
. C oyne, E s q. G eor ge S. L eone, E s q.
Exhibit 32.1




Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the
	Annual Report of Mobilized Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on the Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin Day, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer, Controller and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)        the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)       The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.





Mobilized Entertainment, Inc.Date:
	August 21, 2012

By:

/s/ Kevin DayKevin Day

Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer, Controller and Director





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6099

ETHARD SHERWAND WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID HARMON, Superintendent; WALTER REED

MEDICAL CENTER, Director; JOHN DOE, Jail

Physician,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-03-877-02)

Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 1, 2004

Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ethard Sherwand Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ethard Sherwand Williams appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without

prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The

district court properly required exhaustion of administrative

remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2000). Because Williams did

not demonstrate to the district court that he had exhausted

administrative remedies or that such remedies were not available,

the court’s dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an

abuse of discretion. Because the dismissal was without prejudice,

Williams may, of course, refile his action in the district court if

he can demonstrate exhaustion of all available administrative

remedies. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of - )

)

Product Data Integration Technologies, Inc. 

 d/b/a Modulant

)

)

ASBCA Nos. 63683, 63692, 63693

63694

)

Under Contract No. N00178-15-D-8374

T.O. N65236-17-F-3098

)

)

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Jason W. Moy, Esq.

John J. O’Brien, Esq.

 Cordatis LLP

 Arlington, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

 Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Stephanie Beaty, Esq.

Harold W. Askins, Esq.

 Trial Attorneys

 Hanahan, SC

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The appeals have been withdrawn. Accordingly, they are dismissed from the 

Board’s docket with prejudice.

Dated: May 8, 2024

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 63683, 63692, 63693, 

63694, Appeals of Product Data Integration Technologies, Inc., rendered in 

conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: May 8, 2024

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Concord Medical Services Holdings Limited (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Adam Jigang Sun, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: April 25, 2012



|    |  |                                                     
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Adam Jigang Sun                                 
|    |  | Name: Adam Jigang Sun
Title: Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL SHARP, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1173

)

HEIDE SHARP, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 8, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hardee County; Jeffrey J. McKibben, 

Acting Circuit Judge.

Michael Sharp, pro se. 

Heide Sharp, pro se. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.4.8


FIRST AMENDMENT 
TO 
CONAGRA BRANDS, INC. 
VOLUNTARY DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(January 1, 2017 Restatement)
WHEREAS Conagra Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) sponsors the Conagra Brands, Inc. Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2017 (the “Plan”); and  
WHEREAS, the Company’s Employee Benefits Investment Committee (the “Investment Committee”) has the authority, pursuant to Section 7.1 of the Plan, to select the deemed investments available to Plan participants; and  
WHEREAS, the Investment Committee desires to amend the Plan to remove the Company stock fund as a notional investment option under the Plan; and 
WHEREAS, the definition of compensation in the Plan is revised to keep the same components but related to the current 401(k) plan instead of the frozen pension plan.  
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective January 1, 2018, in the following respects:
1.    This first sentence of the second paragraph of the Plan is amended to read as follows:
“The Plan was established and is maintained by Conagra Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) to permit certain key employees of the Company and of corporations that are related to the Company to defer the receipt of a portion of their income.”  
2.    The second sentence of the second paragraph of Section 3.2 of the Plan shall be amended to read as follows:
“Compensation, for purposes of calculating Employer Matching Contributions, shall be “Compensation” as defined under the Conagra Brands Retirement Income Savings Plan plus any Employee deferrals made pursuant to Section 3.1.”
3.    Section 7.2 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety, and the remaining sections renumbered accordingly.


4.    Section 7.4 of the Plan (renumbered as Section 7.3) shall be amended to read as follows:
“7.3 Funding.  The Company, by action of the Human Resources Committee, may establish one or more rabbi trusts for the Plan.  Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan or the existence of any rabbi trust, the Plan shall be unfunded and the Participants in the Plan shall be no more than general, unsecured creditors of the Employer with regard to benefits payable pursuant to the Plan.  Any such trust(s) shall be subject to all the provisions of the Plan, shall be property of the Company until distributed, and shall be subject to the Company’s general, unsecured creditors and judgment creditors.  Any such trust(s) shall not be deemed to be 


1







collateral security for fulfilling any obligation of the Employer to the Participants.  Except to the extent otherwise determined or directed by the Board or Human Resources Committee, the Company’s policy related to deposits and withdrawals from any trust(s), and the terms of any trust(s), shall be determined by the Investment Committee.”
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed on its behalf, by its officer duly authorized, this 21st day of December, 2017.
	
		
	 
	CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.



	 
	By:  /s/ Ryan Egan______________________
 
        Vice President of Human Resources








2
#### John A. WRIGHT v. DADE COUNTY.

No. 38141.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 216 So.2d 494.
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

Data Series 674

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/674/html/metadata.html            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Tuesday, March 13, 2012, 03:18:01 PM
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00167-CV

Office of Public Utility Counsel, Appellant

v.

Public Utility Commission of Texas, Appellee

DIRECT APPEAL FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

By order of May 6, 2004, this cause has been consolidated into, and will continue as,

appeal number 03-04-00148-CV. No matters being left in cause 03-04-00167-CV, the appeal is

dismissed.

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Appeal Dismissed

Filed: May 6, 2004
#### Pete PROCELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellees.

No. 3466.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Aug. 20, 1971.

Henry W. Bethard, III, Coushatta, John S. Stephens, Coushatta, for plaintiff-appellant.

Jack O. Brittain, Natchitoches, defendants-appellees.

Before SAVOY, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a companion case to Homer Bailes, et al. v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company et al., 252 So.2d 123, in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this date. The plaintiff, Pete Procell, in his capacity as legal tutor of the minor, Larry Wayne Procell, filed this suit for damages for the wrongful death of Barnell Procell, the minor but older brother of Larry Wayne Procell. Made defendants are Roscoe Methvin, father of the minor, James Donald Methvin, and his liability insurer, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, and also Richard R. Hinds, Sr., father of the minor, Richard R. Hinds, Jr. Judgment was rendered in favor of Pete Procell, as tutor of the minor, and against Richard R. Hinds, Sr. in the sum of $10,000. Plaintiff has appealed seeking judgment against Methvin and his insurer and also asking that the award be increased.

*128For the reasons stated in the companion case, the request for judgment against Methvin and his insurer is rejected.

Furthermore, in view of the large discretion of the trial judge as to damages for wrongful death, we will not disturb the quantum of the award.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiff appellant.

Affirmed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 60111 Summary Calendar

GREEN TREE SERVICING, L.L.C .; WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; BEST INSURORS, INCORPORATED; MID STATE CAPITAL, L.L.C.; MID STATE TRUST II; MID STATE TRUST III; MID STATE TRUST IV; MID STATE TRUST V; MID STATE TRUST VI; MID STATE TRUST VII; MID STATE TRUST VIII; MID STATE TR UST IX; MID STATE TRUST X; MID STATE TRUST XI; WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY; MID

- STATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2004

- 1 TRUST; MID

STATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2005

- 1 TRUST; MID

- STATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2006

- 1 TRUST; MID

- STATE CAPITAL TRUST 2010

- 1,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees

v.

ALICIA FLOYD; WILLIAM FLOYD,

Defendants

- Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges

. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 6, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-60111 Document: 00514263465 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2017No. 17

- 60111

2 P ER CURIAM: *

T his appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction based upon binding
precedent in a virtually identical case. Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. Anthony

Charles

, 872 F.3d 637 (5th Cir. 2017)

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 17-60111 Document: 00514263465 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2017
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: United  States--east coast, North Carolina, Cape Hatteras, Wimble Shoals to Ocracoke  Inlet
SuDocs Number:[if !vml]>[endif]>C 55.418/7:11555/
Item Number:0191-B-13  (online)
System Number: 000871185
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11555-3-1994.jpg
2012-05-10 15:42
27M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11555-3-1994.pdf
2012-05-14 10:50
28M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11555-11-1992.jpg
2012-05-10 15:42
26M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11555-11-1992.pdf
2012-05-14 10:48
26M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Thumbs.db
2012-05-14 10:50
16K
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  July 6, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|