alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
116 Nev. 307, 309-311, 998 P.2d 163, 164-65 (2000) (concluding that 

defendant's statements on the record constituted a waiver and obviated 

the need for the State to offer proof of his prior convictions); see also 

Hodges v. State, 119 Nev. 479, 484, 78 P.3d 67, 70 (2003) (to satisfy due 

process concerns prior to habitual criminal adjudication, It] here is less 

chance for mistakes or abuse of the stipulation process as long as a 

defendant must at least admit that he received specific prior convictions"). 

At the preliminary hearing, certified copies of the judgments 

of conviction and additional documents related to Adakai's two prior 

misdemeanor domestic battery convictions were admitted as exhibits; the 

additional documents establish the constitutional validity of the prior 

convictions. The criminal information filed in the district court listed the 

two prior domestic battery convictions. At his arraignment, defense 

counsel informed the district court that Adakai was "going to be pleading 

to domestic battery, third offense." Upon questioning by the district court, 

Adakai admitted to receiving two prior domestic battery convictions. A 

review of the arraignment and plea canvass indicates that Adakai fully 

understood that he was pleading to third-offense domestic battery. The 

State did not offer copies of the prior judgments of conviction into evidence 

at the arraignment, however, defense counsel informed the district court 

that she "reviewed them, your Honor, and I believe they're legally 

sufficient." At the sentencing hearing, there is no indication that the 

State offered copies of the prior judgments into evidence. Nevertheless, 

we conclude that Adakai's admission and defense counsel's statements 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
J. 

J. 

constituted a waiver and stipulation to the proof of the two prior 

convictions used for enhancement purposes. Therefore, we further 

conclude that Adakai is not entitled to relief, and we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 1 

/ 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge 

State Public Defender/Carson City 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Storey County District Attorney 

Storey County Clerk 

'The fast track statement and response do not comply with NRAP 

3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because the text is not double-spaced. 

Counsel for the parties are cautioned that the failure to comply with the 

briefing requirements in the future may result in the imposition of 

sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3
Appendix C 

PICTURES FROM THE SAMPLING EPISODE 
C-1 

Figure C-1. Sampler Working Inside a “Cleanbox” 

 
C-2 

Figure C-2. Sample Tap at the Influent to the FGD Wastewater Treatment System 

 
C-3 

Figure C-3. Sample Collection Set Up at the Pump-Off Station 

 
C-4 

Figure C-4. Composite Sample Collection Set Up at the Effluent from the FGD Wastewater 

Treatment System
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>                THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
                        EXTRACTED  FROM THE  COASTAL  CORPORATION  FORM  10-Q
                        QUARTERLY  REPORT FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
                        AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                        FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                      51
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            1,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         2,189
<PP&E>                                                  10,315
<DEPRECIATION>                                           3,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          10,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    2,179
<BONDS>                                                  3,537
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      100
<PREFERRED>                                                  3
<COMMON>                                                    37
<OTHER-SE>                                               3,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            10,903
<SALES>                                                  5,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         5,329
<CGS>                                                    3,862
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            4,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            29
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            260
<INCOME-TAX>                                                79
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        181
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             91
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                90
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .76
        

</TABLE>
#### William Ray RODEHEAVER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. K-166.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

June 19, 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 30, 1969.

Bennett, Schwartz & Schwartz, Gaines-ville, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James McGuirk, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Pierson v. State, 214 So.2d 17 (Fla.App.1968), and Manning v. State, 203 So.2d 360 (Fla.App. 1967).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the As Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, John R. Ambroseo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Coherent, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 1, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coherent, Inc.

 
| Date:   February 9, 2011                |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   |
|                                    |   |
| /s/:   JOHN R. AMBROSEO                 |   |
| John   R. Ambroseo                      |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-268-004]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 27, 1997, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets identified in 
Appendix A to the filing. Tennessee requests an effective date of 
December 1, 1997.
    Tennessee states that these sheets are filed in compliance with the 
Commission's September 25, 1997, Order Granting Rehearing in Part, 
Accepting Compliance Filing, and Rejecting Tariff Filing issued in the 
above-referenced dockets (September 25, Order). Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company, 80 FERC para.61,359 (1997).
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make Protestants parties to 
this proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29332 Filed 11-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Employment Agreement between West Direct, Inc. and Todd B. Strubbe



 
Exhibit 10.16

 
[WEST LOGO TO APPEAR HERE] 
 

	 To:
	 	 Todd B. Strubbe
	 	 
	 From:
	 	 Thomas B. Barker
	 	 
	 Date:
	 	 February 10, 2003
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 Re:
	 	 2003 Compensation Plan
	 	 


 
Your 2003 compensation plan for your employment as President and CEO of West Direct, Inc. (the “Company”) is as follows: 
 

	1.	 	Your base salary will be $250,000. Should you elect to voluntarily terminate your employment, you will be compensated for your services through the date of your
actual termination per your Employment Agreement. 

 

	2.	 	The rate factors used to calculate your pre-tax profit bonus are being revised according to the schedule below. You are eligible to receive a quarterly performance
bonus based on each quarter’s pre-tax profit growth when compared to the same quarter the previous year. A negative differential will result in a loss carry forward to be applied to future bonus calculations. The bonus will be calculated by
multiplying the year-to-date pre-tax profit differential times the rate factor from the table below minus bonuses paid year-to-date for the respective calendar year. This factor assumes no changes in the inter-company transfer pricing environment.


 
Rate Factor

.075 
 

	3.	 	All pre-tax, pre-corporate allocation profit and net income objectives are based upon the Company’s operations and will not include profit and income derived
from mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures or other non-operating income unless specifically and individually included upon completion of the transaction. 

 

	4.	 	At the discretion of Board of Directors for you’re the Company, you may receive an additional bonus based on your companies and your individual performance.


 

	5.	 	The benefit plans, as referenced in Section 7(h), shall include insurance plans based upon eligibility pursuant to the plans. If the insurance plans do not provide
for continued participation, the continuation of benefits shall be pursuant to COBRA. In the event Employee’s benefits continue pursuant to COBRA and Employee accepts new employment during the consulting term, Employee may continue benefits
thereafter to the extent allowed under COBRA. In no event shall benefits plans include the 401K Plan or the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan. 

 

	
	 By:
	 	 /s/    TODD B. STRUBBE 


	 	 	 Employee—Todd B. Strubbe
OFFICIAL. NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308,CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

©FFflCOAL BUSINESS

STATE ©F TEXAS '

PENALTY FOR

3/11/2015 PRIVATE USE

PARRISH, RONALD BUCK

o v

Q ^IPfyy s.^ ||n^ p|TNEy BOWES

02 1R ^

__ _ 0006557458 MAR 17 2015

Tr. Ct*No. "W03^!r89¥S:-V^ApFROMZlWR42;1?686-r04

On this day, the application for 11 07 Writ of Habeas Corpus has been received

and presented to the Court.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

ss

RONALD BUCK PARR^H^ „

DANIEL UNIT -TDC#118T13DjJ.^^-_

u i ic.':'.!
#### KINSON LUMBER COMPANY, INC. (Employer), and American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, (Carrier), Petitioners, v. SPECIAL DISABILITY FUND and Industrial Relations Commission of Florida, Respondents.

No. 44686.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 12, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PATRICK MARTINEZ

,

Appellant,

v.

T HE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 4

- 00242

- CR

Appeal from the

171 st Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 201 30D04142 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter ’ s third request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter ’ s Record until February 19 , 201 5

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Anita D. Garcia , Court Reporter for the 171 st District Court

,

for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Rec ord for the above styled and numbered

cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before February 19

, 201 5

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of January , 201 5

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

IN RE: No. 08-13-00292-CR

§

BRIAN ANTHONY ENGLETON, AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

§

Relator. IN MANDAMUS

§

§

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus 

against the Honorable Maria Salas-Mendoza, Judge of the 120th District Court of El Paso 

County, Texas, and concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. 

We therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this 

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
#### Henry L. LOVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-840.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 29, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Jun e 15, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00181

- CV

THREE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FORTY

- FIVE DOLLARS ($3,445.00) UNITED STATES CURRENCY

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 08281 Hon orable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant is an inmate acting pro se in a civil suit

. Appellant asserts he is indigent, but he did not file an affidavit of indigence “ in the trial court with or before the notice of appeal.”
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(c)(1) (emphasis added).
On June 1, 2016, we abated this appeal so any party could filed a contest to Appellant’s affidavit of indigence. We ordered any party wishing to file a contest to file it in this court by June 13, 2016 . No contest was timely filed. For purposes of this appeal, Appellant is indigent. “[T]he trial court clerk and the court reporter must prepare the appellate record without prepayment.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(k).

We REINSTATE the a ppellate timetable. The clerk’s and reporter’s record s are due within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s et my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 15th day of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of China Metro-Rural Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee Che
Chiu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

July 11, 2011



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/ Lee Che Chiu       
|Name:  |  | Lee Che Chiu           
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Rudolph GIBSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-596.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: North  America--west coast, Gulf of Alaska, Strait of Juan de Fuca to Kodiak Island
SuDocs Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> [if !vml]>[endif]> C 55.418/7:531/

Item Number:  [if !vml]>[endif]>0191-B-15 (online)
System Number: 000871771
[if !vml]>[endif]>
531-1-1980.jpg
2012-05-23 10:17
32M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
531-1-1980.pdf
2012-05-23 12:44
32M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
531-3-1982.jpg
2012-05-23 10:18
36M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
531-3-1982.pdf
2012-05-23 12:46
36M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
531-5-1975.jpg
2012-05-23 10:15
27M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
531-5-1975.pdf
2012-05-23 12:40
27M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
531-10-1977.jpg
2012-05-23 10:17
32M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
531-10-1977.pdf
2012-05-23 12:42
32M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
531-11-1976.jpg
2012-05-23 10:16
27M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
531-11-1976.pdf
2012-05-23 12:41
27M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Thumbs.db
2012-05-23 12:46
36K
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  July29, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 9816.

#### Beal, Admr., *v.*Lauer.

(Decided January 22, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Lorain County.

*Mr. L. B. Gardner*and *Mr. F. M.*Stevens, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John C. Conaway*and *Mr. Charles A. Metcalf,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
# October 2008 - April 2009
Contact Us

#   Electronic Submission of TRI Reporting Forms

Log in to TRI-MEweb

Facilities prepare and submit Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting forms using TRI-MEweb. This software guides facility representatives through the steps for completing, reviewing, and submitting TRI reporting forms.

**On this page:**
                - What's New?
                - TRI-MEweb Guidance
                - TRI-MEweb Tutorials
                - Central Data Exchange (CDX) Tutorials
                - TRI Data Exchange

----

                    - TRI Information Center: tri.help@epa.gov
                    - CDX Hotline: 1-888-890-1995
                    - Using TRI-MEweb to Report TRI Data  (1-hour training video)
                    - Reporting Contacts	                       - EPA Regional TRI Coordinators
                      - State TRI Coordinators
                      - Tribal TRI Coordinators 

## What's New?

                -  List of TRI-MEweb Enhancements for RY 2023 (pdf)(126.4 KB, 1/3/24)     

## TRI-MEweb Guidance

Learn about the TRI reporting software and how to begin using it. 

## TRI-MEweb Tutorials

Access tutorials describing specific features and functionality of the reporting software via the PDF below or within TRI-MEweb itself.
                -  List of TRI-MEweb Mini Tutorials (pdf)(123.92 KB, 8/7/24)     

## CDX Tutorials

TRI-MEweb is accessed through EPA's Central Data Exchange. To begin using TRI-MEweb, users must first create a CDX account.

## TRI Data Exchange (TDX)

Facilities located in a state or territory, or in the Indian country of a tribe participating in TDX will have their TRI reporting forms simultaneously submitted to both EPA and the relevant state, territorial or tribal government department. Find out more about TDX and which states, tribes and territories participate.

          -  TRI Program Home 
          -  What is TRI?              -  Covered Chemicals 
            -  Covered Industry Sectors 
            -  Data Quality 
          -  Reporting for Facilities              -  Guidance (GuideME) 
            -  Reporting Software (TRI-MEweb) 
            -  Laws & Regulatory Activities 
            -  Enforcement 
          -  TRI Data & Tools 
          -  Pollution Prevention 
          -  TRI Data in Action              -  TRI for Communities 
            -  Data Uses Catalog 
            -  What You Can Do 
          -  TRI Site Map 

Contact Us
Exhibit 15.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We have issued our report dated March 30, 2012 with respect
to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of China Ceramics Co., Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2011. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of
China Ceramics Co., Ltd. on Form F-3 (File No.333-164784, effective February 14, 2011)



|/s/ GRANT THORNTON     | 
|---------------------- | 
|                       | 
|Shanghai, PRC          | 
|March
    30,     2012 |