alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,816
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,182
<PP&E>                                          10,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,976
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,058
<BONDS>                                          2,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,115
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,578)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,010
<SALES>                                         10,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,888
<CGS>                                           10,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (262)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   175
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  63
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (796)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (814)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (835)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

No. 14-1421 

MICHAEL W. CUTTING; WELLS STALEY-MAYS; and ALISON E. PRIOR, 

Plaintiffs, Appellees, 

v. 

CITY OF PORTLAND, MAINE, 

Defendant, Appellant. 

ERRATA SHEET 

 The opinion of this Court issued on September 11, 2015, is 

amended as follows: 

 On page 17, line 6, delete the comma after "look" in the 

quoted text. 

 On page 18, line 18, change "Plaintiffs" to "plaintiffs." 

 On page 19, line 1, change "were" to "where."
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20891 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PAUL DOUGLAS CELESTINE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-380-1

-------------------- July 19, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Paul Douglas Celestine appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to possession of a firearm by a felon. Celestine, who had previous Texas state court felony convictions, admitted that on January 9, 1998, he pawned a nine millimeter Smith & Wesson pistol, two magazines, and an additional gray gun at a Houston pawn shop. The ticket for this transaction was found in Celestine’s possession when he was arrested for an October 1998 aggravated robbery with a dangerous weapon. Taking into account the aggravated robbery conviction, the district court calculatedNo. 00-20891 -2- Celestine’s base offense level as 20 under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(4)(A). Celestine contends that he did not have a prior felony conviction under § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) because his conviction for aggravated robbery was after the commission of the firearms offense. Celestine acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Gooden , 116 F.3d 721, 724-25 (5th Cir. 1997), in which this court held that if the sentence for the prior conviction is imposed prior to sentencing on the firearms offense such that it qualifies for criminal history points, it constitutes a "prior felony conviction" for purposes of determining the base offense level under § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of iMetrik M2M Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Michel St-Pierre, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 19th day of August, 2010.








MICHEL ST-PIERREMichel St-PierreChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
WELLINGTON PPIF MANAGEMENT, LLC 

75 State Street 

Boston, Massachusetts 02109 

Mr. Herbert M. Allison, Jr. 

Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability 

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20220 

 March 2, 2010 

Dear Mr. Allison: 

Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Wellington 

Management Legacy Securities PPIF Master Fund, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the 

“Partnership”), dated as of October 1, 2009 (as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented 

from time to time, the “Partnership Agreement”) and (ii) the Loan Agreement, dated as of the date set 

forth on Schedule A thereto, by and among the Partnership, as borrower, The Bank of New York Mellon, 

as administrative agent and collateral agent, and The United States Department of the Treasury, as lender 

(as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”). 

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Partnership Agreement or 

the Loan Agreement, as applicable. 

In connection with the Legacy Securities Public-Private Investment Program, the General Partner 

hereby represents that it or any of its Affiliates has received a written representation (each, an 

“Underlying Representation”) from each Private Investor listed in Exhibit I that the amount set forth 

opposite its name on Exhibit I represents capital that was directly or indirectly committed to the 

UST/TCW Senior Mortgage Securities Fund, L.P. (the sum of such amounts being the “Aggregate 

Reallocated Capital”). The General Partner further represents that the materials attached as Exhibit II

hereto provide true and complete evidence of each Underlying Representation. 

In reliance on the foregoing representations, UST hereby agrees that (i) notwithstanding Section 

3.1(g) of the Partnership Agreement, the Capital Commitment of UST to the Partnership may exceed 

$1,111,111,111.00 to the extent of the Aggregate Reallocated Capital and (ii) notwithstanding anything to 

the contrary in the Loan Documents, upon the increase of the Capital Commitment of one or more Private 

Vehicles in respect of all or any portion of the Aggregate Reallocated Capital, the Maximum UST Debt 
[Wellington Management Legacy Securities PPIF Master Fund, LP Aggregate Reallocated Capital Letter]

Amount shall be increased in an amount equal to twice the amount of such portion of the Aggregate 

Reallocated Capital. 

* * * * 


EXHIBIT I 

Private Investor List 

Private Investor Capital Commitment
EXHIBIT II 

(See attached.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1563

JOHN FITZGERALD ROOKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (2:18-cv-00016-BO)

Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 26, 2019

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Fitzgerald Rooks, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Bryan Royster, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Fitzgerald Rooks appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ 

motion to dismiss and denying as moot Rooks’ motions for default judgment. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Rooks v. U.S. Postal Serv., No. 2:18-cv-00016-BO (E.D.N.C. 

Apr. 24, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1749 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to direct the Secretary 

of Health and Human Services to conduct a study on potential disparities 

in incurred costs for rural and urban hospitals under the inpatient 

prospective payment system and to authorize appropriate payment adjustments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2021 

Mr. KELLER (for himself, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. THOMPSON of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. LUCAS, and Mr. STEUBE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 

Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to direct 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct 

a study on potential disparities in incurred costs for 

rural and urban hospitals under the inpatient prospective 

payment system and to authorize appropriate payment 

adjustments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reviewing Urban and 

5 Rural Adjustments to Level Hospital Expenses and LopVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:36 May 03, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1749.IH H1749

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1749 IH

1 sided Payments Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘RURAL HELP Act 

2 of 2021’’. 

3 SEC. 2. STUDY ON INCURRED COSTS DISPARITIES UNDER 

4 IPPS; AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT ADJUST5 MENTS. 

6 Section 1886(d)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)) is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(N)(i) Not later than 2 years after the date of the 

10 enactment of this subparagraph, the Secretary shall con11 duct a study to determine if, under the methodology for 

12 determining payments under paragraph (1)(A), and using 

13 both national and hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios, 

14 costs incurred by hospitals located in rural areas by diag15 nosis-related group exceed those costs incurred by hos16 pitals located in urban areas. 

17 ‘‘(ii) Insofar as the Secretary determines through the 

18 study conducted under clause (i) that costs incurred by 

19 hospitals located in rural areas exceed those costs incurred 

20 by hospitals located in urban areas, the Secretary shall 

21 provide for an appropriate adjustment to payments under 

22 paragraph (1)(A) to reflect those higher costs for dis23 charges occurring on or after October 1 of a year specified 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1749 IH

1 by the Secretary (but in no case later than 2 years after 

2 the date of the enactment of this subparagraph).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                           INSITE PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C.
                              1950 Stemmons Freeway
                                   Suite 4048
                               DALLAS, TEXAS 75207

                                  March 6, 2003

Danny Gunter
REFOCUS GROUP, INC.
1950 Stemmons Freeway
Suite 4048
Dallas, Texas 75207

Dear Mr. Gunter:

     We have been advised that Refocus Group, Inc. ("Refocus") intends to enter
a merger transaction with Presby Corp ("Presby") resulting in Refocus adopting
the business operations of Presby. As you are aware, we are owed $1,800 for
services provided to Refocus in connection with the maintenance of the "Grade
The Web" website (the "Website"). We propose that, in the event you consummate
the merger transaction with Presby, we acquire all rights, title and interest in
and to the Website in consideration of our forgiveness of the $1,800 presently
owed to our firm for services provided during calendar 2002 and through the date
of this letter. In addition, the website agreement and office lease between
Insite Productions, L.L.C. and Refocus shall be terminated as of the effective
date of the merger transaction. We acknowledge that upon consummation of this
transaction, we will have no further claims against Refocus.

     By executing this Letter Agreement in the designated space below, you
acknowledge and agree to transfer all rights, title and interest in and to the
Website immediately subsequent to the closing of the above-referenced merger
transaction in consideration for our release of Refocus of any and all
obligations due and owing to us, including the amount of $1,800 payable under
that certain invoice dated December 31, 2002. Furthermore, we will be
responsible for properly evidencing the transfer of ownership in the Website.

                                              Sincerely yours,
                                              Insite Productions, L.L.C.


                                              /s/ Adrienne Beam
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Adrienne Beam, President

<Page>

Acknowledged and accepted this 6th day of March, 2003 by Refocus Group, Inc.

REFOCUS GROUP, INC.


/s/ Danny Gunter
-------------------------------
Danny Gunter, Chairman
# L_2006047EN.01005701.xml

| 17.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/57

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 February 2006

appointing a member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2006/107/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 259 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2002/758/EC, Euratom of 17 September 2002 appointing the members of the Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2002 to 20 September 2006 (1),

Whereas a member’s seat on the above Committee has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr Ib WISTISEN, of which the Council was informed on 15 November 2005,

Having regard to the nomination submitted by the Danish government,

Having obtained the opinion of the European Commission,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Ms Marie-Louise KNUPPERT is hereby appointed a member of the European Economic and Social Committee in place of Mr Ib WISTISEN for the remainder of his term of office, namely until 20 September 2006.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 14 February 2006.

For the Council

The President

K.-H. GRASSER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 253, 21.9.2002, p. 9.

1

---
#### G. D. THOMPSON, Jr. v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49891.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 21, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 26, 1977.

Hugh L. Bailey, Winona, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Wayne Snuggs, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, BROOM and LEE, JJ.
#### Tevy CHERNIN, Petitioner, v. SECURITY GUARDS, INC., a Florida corporation and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 69-173.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 8, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-221496, No. 333-197513, No. 333-177492 and No. 333-170591) and Form S-8 (No. 333-223490, No. 333-216440, No. 333-209939, No. 333-202529, No. 333-194520, No. 333-187355, No. 333-180046, No. 333-174283, No. 333-167360 and No. 333-162785) of Cowen Inc. of our report dated March 23, 2016 relating to the financial statements of Starboard Value A LP which appears in this Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of Cowen Inc.








/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP


New York, New York


March 22, 2018
House Calendar No. 1

105TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 105–1

IN THE MATTER OF REPRESENTATIVE NEWT GINGRICH--

pages 901 to 1000
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-1121 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

Agricultural Products 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CHILE 

Effected by Exchange of Letters at 

Washington November 21, 2008 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CHILE 

Trade: Agricultural Products 

 Agreement effected by exchange of letters at 

 Washington November 21, 2008; 

 Entered into force November 21, 2008.
No. 9599.

#### The Coney Island Co. *v.*Mitsch, Admr.

(Decided December 11, 1906.)

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Mr. Robert Ramsey*and *Mr. J. R. Schindel,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Shay &*Cogan, for defendant in error.

Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error.

Shauck, C. J., Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00470-CR

David A. MEDRANO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR4205

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED September 9, 2015.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Exhibit 10.9





Agreement on behalf of equity holders




Party A:  Jinlin Guo




Address: Xixiang JiaHua Park E-16 Bao An District Shenzhen Guangdong




ID number: 43292819700811001X




Party B: Bing Liu




Address: 3rd class Shiyang Cun Shiyang Zhen Xiantian Hunan




ID number: 432928197301075014




After friendly consultation, the two sides reached the following consensus:




1 Commissioned content:




Party B shall on behalf of Party A to hold the 726250 shares of AIVtech International Group Co., Ltd, and on behalf of Party A to exercise the relevant rights of shareholders. Party B agrees to entrust voluntarily.




2 Delegated authority:




Party B should exercise relevant rights of shareholders in his/her own name, be named on the register of shareholders, take part in the company activities, collect dividends or bonus on behalf of Party A, attend the shareholders meeting and vote.




3 Rights and obligations:




Party A as the actual investors, has the right to practice and get the appropriate return on investment , Party B does not enjoy the right to dispose of any gain formed by the investment .




In the commissioning period, Party A has the right to transfer the relevant shares to himself or to the third person appointed by himself. Party B shall unconditionally agree. In the commissioning period, Party A shall bear the related costs, taxes and stockholder registration fee which generated from the activity of Party B on behalf of Party A.




Party A as the actual stock owner, has the right to supervise and redress fiduciary improper Behavior of Party B, and request Party B to compensate for the losses caused by improper Behavior.




Settlement of disputes




When the disputes happen during the performance of this Agreement, Party A and Party B should have a consultation with each other first, if still can not settle the disputes, then should prosecute through the People's Court of Shenzhen City.









Others




1.           This Agreement in duplicate, one belongs to Party A, the other belongs  to Party B, this two agreements have the same legal effect.




2.           This Agreement become effective since the day that both Party signed the Agreement.






Signature:




/s/ Jinlin Guo




/s/ Bing Liu




2010-5-5