alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Johnnie WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-181.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

May 1, 1969.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; Warren H. Edwards, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                          73,763
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                    29,174
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               224,088
<PP&E>                                         289,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 562,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,493
<BONDS>                                         17,885
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,856
<OTHER-SE>                                     411,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   562,146
<SALES>                                        373,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               431,843
<CGS>                                          292,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  292,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,831<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,961
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,524
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
<FN>
<F1>Includes restructuring charges totalling $2.6 million less a restructuring
credit of $400,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Richard WATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1382.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 9, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen. and Kenneth G. Spillia, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

CROSS, LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220

April 4, 2014

Jeffrey J. Hurd, Esq.

Executive Vice President

Human Resources and Communications

American International Group, Inc.

175 Water Street

New York, NY 10038

Re: Compensation Payments and Structure for AIG “Top 25” Employee

Dear Mr. Hurd:

Pursuant to the Department of the Treasury’s Interim Final Rule, TARP Standards for 

Compensation and Corporate Governance (the “Rule”), on April 1, 2011, the Office of the 

Special Master issued a determination letter (the “Determination Letter”) to American 

International Group, Inc. (“AIG”), with respect to 2011 compensation payments and structures 

for AIG’s “top 25” executive officers and most highly compensated employees. 31 C.F.R. § 

30.16(a)(3)(i).

AIG has requested that the Office of the Special Master modify a provision of the longterm restricted stock element of employee number 1087’s 2011 compensation package. Pursuant 

to the Determination Letter, the employee was awarded long-term restricted stock having a 

grant-date value of $1,200,000 for the employee’s 2011 services (the “2011 LTRS award”). The 

Determination Letter permits two-thirds of the award to vest not earlier than the second 

anniversary of the award date, and the remaining portion not earlier than the third anniversary of 

the award date.

The Rule requires a minimum two-year service period for the vesting of any award of 

long-term restricted stock, except in instances of death, disability and certain change in control 

events. 31 C.F.R. § 30.1, paragraph (4) of the definition of “long-term restricted stock”. The 

Determination Letter incorporates the Rule’s exceptions for terminations of employment 

resulting from death or disability, but does not include the Rule’s exception for terminations of 

employment resulting from certain changes in control. In adopting vesting conditions that are 

stricter than the Rule permits, the Office of the Special Master preserves its ability to decide on a 

case-by-case basis whether any modification of those stricter vesting provisions may be 

appropriate based on specific facts and circumstances.

AIG hired the employee in 2010 to head one of its subsidiaries, and specifically to 

prepare the subsidiary for an IPO or sale. We further understand from AIG that since the 

employee joined the company it has considered a number of transactions that would have
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29322]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. 95-078-5]


Agency Information Collection Activities; OMB Approval Received

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Office of Management and Budget's approval of a 
collection of information contained in the Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service final rule amending the regulations for the humane 
treatment of dogs under the Animal Welfare Act by removing the 
provisions for tethering dogs as a means of primary enclosure.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gregg Ramsey, APHIS Information 
Collection Coordinator, AIM, APHIS, suite 2C11, 4700 River Road Unit 
103, Riverdale, MD 20737-1235, (301) 734-5682.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 13, 1997, we published in the Federal Register (62 FR 
43272-43275, Docket No. 95-078-2) a final rule amending the regulations 
at 9 CFR parts 1 and 3, ``Humane Treatment of Dogs; Tethering.'' This 
rule contains information collection requirements. On October 3, 1997, 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the collection of 
information requirements with respect to this final rule under OMB 
control number 0579-0093 (expires April 30, 2000).

    Done in Washington, DC, this 30th day of October 1997.
Craig A. Reed,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 97-29322 Filed 11-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
First Amendment to Metasolv, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan



 
Exhibit 4.5

 
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
METASOLV, INC. 
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is effective as set forth below and is made by the Board of Directors of MetaSolv, Inc. (the “Company”). 
 
W I T N E S S E T H: 
 
WHEREAS, the Company has previously established the MetaSolv, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”), effective
August 24, 1999, for the benefit of eligible employees; 
 
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has the right to make certain amendments to the Plan without the approval of the stockholders of the Company;

 
WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the
Plan to give the Company the right to terminate Offering Periods (as defined in the Plan); and 
 
WHEREAS, the amendment contemplated herein may be effectuated by the Board without the approval of the stockholders of the Company. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 
Section 6(d) is hereby added to the Plan effective May 1, 2003
to read as follows: 
 
(d)  The right of a Participant to purchase shares of Common Stock on a Purchase Date shall vest on (i) in the case of an Offering Period for which the Board, or any Committee or persons to which the Board delegates, sets a
maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by a Participant in the Offering Period, the last day of the Offering Period, and (ii) in the case of any other Offering Period, the later of (1) the date any performance conditions,
imposed by the Committee before an Offering Period on the exercise of a purchase right, are satisfied as determined by the Committee or (2) the date it becomes certain that there are a sufficient number of shares of Common Stock available for
delivery under the Plan to satisfy the shares of Common Stock purchasable by Participants in the Offering Period without regard to the Company’s right to make pro rata allocations as provided in Section 5(a). The 







Board may terminate any Offering Period and return all contributions related thereto to
Participants prior to the vesting of any purchase rights pursuant to this Section 6(d). 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further provided that, except as stated above, the Plan shall continue to read in its current state. 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company
as of the date specified below and effective as set forth herein. 
 

	 METASOLV, INC.

	
	 By:
	 	 /s/    James P.
Janicki        


	 	 	 James P. Janicki, Chief Executive Officer



 

2
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

July 16, 2010

BlackRock Public-Private Investment Fund (GenPar), LLC

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

RE: UST Notification

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of BlackRock

PPIF, L.P., dated as of October 2, 2009 (as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented from

time to time, the “Partnership Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the

meanings set forth in the Partnership Agreement.

UST hereby informs the General Partner that notwithstanding the proviso in the definition of

“Final Closing Date” in Article I of the Partnership Agreement, Section 3.3 of the Partnership Agreement

or that certain letter agreement between UST and the General Partner dated March 22, 2010 relating to a

UST Reallocation, UST will not consent to (i) an extension of the Final Closing Date or (ii) any

additional Subsequent Closings, following the date hereof. For the avoidance of doubt, as of the date

hereof, the Capital Commitment of UST is $694,980,000.00 and the maximum amount of UST debt that

may be drawn down in accordance with the Loan Agreement is $1,389,960,000.00.

* * * *
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-344-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

November 4, 1997.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on Tuesday, November 18, 1997, at 1:30 p.m. and 
Wednesday, November 19, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, for the purposes of exploring the possible 
settlement of the above-referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.214).

    For additional information, please contact Kathleen M. Dias at 
(202) 208-0524 or Michael D. Cotleur at (202) 208-1076.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29551 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29056]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

Interagency Committee for Medical Records (ICMR) Cancellation of 
Medical Standard Form and Establishment of a New Medical Form

AGENCY: General Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Standard Form 517, Clinical Record--Anesthesia is cancelled. 
This form will now be Optional Form 517. Each anesthesia unit collects 
information diferrently; so a single standard form will not meet their 
needs. Therefore, this form is being changed to an optional form giving 
the agencies leaway to collect this data as they see fit.
    The new optional form reflects a major revision of the SF 517. The 
new Optional Form 517 collects in greater detail the administration of 
anesthesia.
    The OF 517 will be authorized for local reproduction. You can 
request a camera copy of SF 517 from General Services Administration 
(CARM), Attn.: Barbara Williams, (202) 501-0581.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Barbara Williams, GSA (202) 501-0581.

DATES: Effective November 4, 1997.

    Dated: October 27, 1997.
Barbara M. Williams,
Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-29056 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6429
HERBERT HIGHTOWER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL MOORE, Commissioner; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-97-490-5-23JI) Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 10, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert Hightower, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE A TTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judgerecommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waiveappellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to file timely objections in the district court. Thus, the district court, after reviewing the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and dismissed thecase. Appellant appeals. The filing of timely objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of the report. See United States v. Schronce , 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Because Appellant failed to filed objections after receiving notification of the need to file such objections, he waived his right to appellate review. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Hightower v. Moore , No. CA-97-490-5-23JI (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Willie Anderson DOCK, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-437.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 4, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Raymond J. Hare, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Hugh H. ADAMS et al. v. STATE of Louisiana, Through DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS. Patricia Adams BERGERON v. STATE of Louisiana, Through DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS.

No. 62634.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Hugh H. Adams, Individually, and as Natural Tutor of his minor son, Patrick Dean Adams, Roger Dale Adams, Hugh Adams, Jr., Cecile Kent Adams, and Patricia Adams Bergeron, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Lafourche. 359 So.2d 681.

Writ denied.
Item 77D DWS Mid Cap Growth Fund and DWS
Small Cap Growth Fund (each a series of DWS
Advisor Funds)


At a meeting held May 21-22, 2008, the Board of
Trustees of DWS Mid Cap Growth Fund and DWS
Small Cap Growth Fund, each a series of DWS
Advisor Funds, approved each Fund's ability to lend
its investment securities in an amount up to 33 1/3%
of its total assets to approved institutional borrowers
who need to borrow securities in order to complete
certain transactions.  Each Fund previously had the
ability to lend its investment securities in an amount
up to 30% of its total assets.


E:\Electronic Working Files\NSAR\2008\9-30-08\DWS Advisor
Funds (annual)\03-Exhibits\Exhibit 77D DWS Advisor Funds
Mid Cap Small Cap.doc
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29199]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Direct Grant Programs and Fellowship Programs

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Correction; Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 7, 1997, the Education Department published in the 
Federal Register (62 FR 52429) a notice announcing direct grant 
programs and fellowship programs under which the Secretary has invited 
or expects to invite applications for new awards for fiscal year 1998. 
This notice corrects a telephone number listed in Chart 5 of the 
October 7 notice. On page 52441, the telephone number (202) 205-9182 
for the Grants and Contracts Services Team, Office of Special Education 
and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs is 
corrected to (202) 260-9182.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Art Stewart, U. S. Department of 
Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 3652, ROB-3, Washington, 
DC 20202-4248. Telephone: (202) 708-8515. Internet: (Arthur--
S<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#deaabba9bfacaa9ebbbaf0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fe8a9b899f8c8abe9b9ad0999188">[email protected]</span></a>). Individuals who use a telecommunications device for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number, if any, listed in the 
individual application notices. If a TDD number is not listed for a 
given program, individuals who use a TDD may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 
p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.

    Dated: October 30, 1997.
Donald Rappaport,
Chief Financial and Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-29199 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
×
 ×
 ×
 ×
 ×
 ×
 ×
 Step 1
                    Identify
                    Stakeholders
 Step 2
                    Use
                    Safety Data
 Step 3
                    Choose Proven
                    Solutions
 Step 4
                    Implement
                    Solutions
 Finish Line
  Welcome to the local road safety plan do-it-yourself website! We are so happy you are here. On this site, you’ll find everything you need to make a plan that fits your community and gets people home safely. Watch the video below to learn how to use the site and build your plan. If you need help contact us anytime.  How to Use This Site
 Welcome - FHWA Leadership
                    LRSP Welcome Video Thumbnail Local Road Safety Plans Overview
                    Local Road Safety Plan Video Thumbnail Local Agency Insights: Introduction
                    LRSP Local Agency Insights: Introduction Video Thumbnail Road to Zero Videos
                    Vision Zero Videos All Public Roads
                    Vision Zero Videos Introduction to theSafe System Approach
                    Safety Plan Tips with Mark Doctor Video Thumbnail Tribal Transportation Safety Plans with Adam Larsen
                    Tribal Transportation Safety Plans with Adam Larsen Video Thumbnail
 Content will open in a new window Tools and Resources Guides & Training  Infographic
                            Developing Safety Plans Manual
                            TSP and Zero Deaths: A Guide for MPOs and Locals
                            Improving Safety on Rural Local and Tribal Roads
                            Tutorial - Introduction
 LRSP Examples
 LRSP Sites  California
                            Indiana
                            Minnesota
                            North Dakota
                            Washington
                            Tribal Safety Plans
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dominos Pizza, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 13, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Brandon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that based on my knowledge:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. BrandonDavid A. BrandonChief Executive Officer




Dated: July 27, 2004



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Dominos Pizza, Inc. and will be retained by Dominos Pizza, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.