alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005083EN.01004601.xml

| 1.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 83/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 83/46

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 518/2005

of 31 March 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 25 to 31 March 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 313, 12.10.2004, p. 10.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
Exhibits 8.1. List of significant subsidiaries of Pampa Energía S.A. 1) Generation Business Inversora Nihuiles S.A. Inversora Diamante S.A. Inversora Piedra Buena S.A. Central Térmica Loma de la Lata S.A. Powerco S.A. Hidroeléctrica Los Nihuiles S.A. Hidroeléctrica Diamante S.A. Central Piedra Buena S.A. Central Térmica Güemes S.A. Energía Distribuida S.A. Pampa Comercializadora S.A. 2) Transmission Business Transelec Argentina S.A. Citelec S.A. Transener S.A. Transba S.A. 3) Distribution Business IEASA S.A. EASA S.A. Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte S.A. 4) Oil Business Petrolera Pampa S.A. 5) Gas Business EPCA S.A. Compañía de Inversiones de Energía S.A.


---



TGS S.A. 6) Other
Business Pampa Real
Estate S.A. Bodega Loma de la
Lata S.A. All of the
subsidiaries mentioned above have their jurisdiction of incorporation in the
Republic of Argentina.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of
VimpelCom Ltd. (the Company), does hereby certify to such officers knowledge that:

The Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2011



|                    |  |                               
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|By:                 |  | /s/ Alexander Izosimov        
|Name:               |  | Alexander Izosimov            
|Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer       
|                   
|Date: June 30, 2011
|                    | 
|By:                 |  | /s/ Cornelis Hendrik van Dalen
|Name:               |  | Cornelis Hendrik van Dalen    
|Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
No. 9699.

#### Hart et al., County Commissioners, et al, *v.*Brown.

(Decided November 27, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hancock County.

*Mr. William L. David,*prosecuting attorney, for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Franks & Franks,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew and Summers, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Floyd F. Chadee, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 5, 2008



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    FLOYD F. CHADEE                                           
|Floyd F. Chadee Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Chief Executive Officer of Domino's, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify
that to the undersigned's knowledge:

     1)   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
          March 23, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   the information contained in the Company's Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

                                    /s/ David A. Brandon
                                    ------------------------------
                                    David A. Brandon
                                    Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 6, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29485]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

DATE AND TIME: Friday, November 14, 1997, 9:30 a.m.

PLACE: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, N.W., Room 
540, Washington, DC 20425.

STATUS:

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Minutes of October 10, 1997 Meeting
III. Announcements
IV. Staff Director's Report
V. Regional Director's Discussion
VI. Future Agenda Items

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Barbara Brooks, Press and 
Communications (202) 376-8312.
Stephanie Y. Moore,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-29485 Filed 11-4-97; 12:23 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
PUBLIC LAW 111–288—NOV. 30, 2010 124 STAT. 3061 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3567: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

July 30, considered and passed Senate. 

Nov. 16, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–288 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 100 Broadway 

in Lynbrook, New York, as the ‘‘Navy Corpsman Jeffrey L. Wiener Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAVY CORPSMAN JEFFREY L. WIENER POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 100 Broadway in Lynbrook, New York, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Navy Corpsman Jeffrey L. Wiener 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Navy Corpsman Jeffrey L. Wiener Post Office Building’’. 

Approved November 30, 2010. 

Nov. 30, 2010 

[S. 3567] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Mauricio Hernandez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 16

- 00741

- CR

Trial court case number: 1426482

Trial court: 180th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s brief was originally due on December 1, 2016. Represented by two different

a ppointed lawyers in succession, appellant has filed three motion s for extension of the deadline for filing an appellant’s brief. We have granted extensions thro ugh March 3, 2017. On March 7, 2017, counsel filed a fourth motion for extension

.

T he last three motions have noted counsel ’s inability to contact the appellant.

W e abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing at which appellant and trial counsel shall be present in person. * T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(3). The court

coordinator of the trial court shall set a date for the hearing and notify the parties, including appellant. We direct the trial court to make appropriate written finding s of fact and conclusions of law and to execute any necessary orders on the issue whether appellant desires to pursue his appeal or has abandoned his appeal.

The trial court’s findings and recommendations (separate and apart from any docket sheet

notation ) and any orders issued pursuant to this hearing shall be included in a supplemental

clerk’s record and filed in this c ourt no later than 30 days from the date of this order. The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing and file the reporter’s

record with the c ourt no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Additionally, i f the hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a certifi ed electronic copy of the hearing shall be

filed in this c ourt no later than 30 days from the date of this order.

* If appellant is now incarcerated, he may appear by closed video teleconference. Any such

teleconference must use a closed

- circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request, appellant and his counsel shall be able to communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing the State.The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this c ourt’s active

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this c ourt’s active docket when the supplemental clerk’s record and reporter’s record of the hearing are filed in this c ourt.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date : March 1 4 , 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3738 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3738

 To reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 6, 2024

  Ms. Stabenow (for herself, Mr. Vance, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Young, Ms. 
  Duckworth, Mr. Brown, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Durbin, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. 
     Smith, Mr. Peters, Mr. Fetterman, Mr. Schumer, and Mr. Casey) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Great Lakes Restoration Initiative 
Act of 2024'' or the ``GLRI Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. GREAT LAKES RESTORATION INITIATIVE REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 118(c)(7)(J)(i) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
(33 U.S.C. 1268(c)(7)(J)(i)) is amended--
            (1) in subclause (V), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subclause (VI), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                                    ``(VII) $500,000,000 for each of 
                                fiscal years 2027 through 2031.''.
                                 <all>
```
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advantage. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 18, 2010 | /s/ Andy J. Mah         |   |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                            | Andy J. Mah             |   |
|                            | Chief Executive Officer |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3640 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3640

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
      at 155 South Main Street in Mount Clemens, Michigan, as the 
        ``Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT COLONEL ALEXANDER JEFFERSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 155 South Main Street in Mount Clemens, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lieutenant 
Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate April 23, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3640

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
      at 155 South Main Street in Mount Clemens, Michigan, as the 
        ``Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office''.
```
ACCEPTED 04-15-00388-CR FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7/21/2015 2:09:44 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of**

**Axiologix Education Corporation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

** **

** **

 

I, John P. Daglis, certify that:

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Axiologix Education Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Daglis, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.  

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

 

 

            Date:  October 13, 2011                                               /s/ John P. Daglis

                                                                                                John P. Daglis

                                                                                                Chief Executive Officer and 

Chief Financial Officer
REGISTERED LOBBYIST CONTACT DISCLOSURE FORM 

This form is to be completed by Executive Branch employees who are contacted by registered lobbyists regarding 

EESA. This report includes a written description of each contact, the date and time of the contact, and the names 

of the registered lobbyist(s) and the employee(s) with whom the contact took place. Written materials prepared 

by registered lobbyists should be attached to this form for posting on the website. The information on this form will 

be available to the public on Treasury's website.

To be completed by the employee contacted 

Date and time of contact: 

Name of the 

Employee(s) Contacted 

(Name and Title) 

Brief description of the communication: 

(attach separate sheet if necessary) 

Name of the Employee(s) who prepared this form: Date

Registered Lobbyist Name: Title: Firm or Organization:, if 

applicable 

Client
#### STATE of Florida, Department of General Services, Division of Bond Finance, and State of Florida, State Board of Administration, Appellants, v. Leonard Lee RATNER, Esther Ratner and Leeco Gas and Oil Co., and State of Florida, Department of Transportation, Appellees.

No. N-53.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 12, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29347]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97F-0440]


Cytec Industries, Inc.; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that 
Cytec Industries, Inc., has filed a petition proposing that the food 
additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of 1,6-
hexanediamine, N,N'-bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-, polymers 
with morpholine-2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine reaction products, 
methylated, as a stabilizer for olefin polymers intended for use in 
contact with food.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Vir D. Anand, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-216), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3081.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 8B4562) has been filed by Cytec Industries, 
Inc., c/o Keller and Heckman, 1001 G St. NW., suite 500 West, 
Washington, DC 20001. The petition proposes to amend the food additive 
regulations in Sec. 178.2010 Antioxidants and/or stabilizers for 
polymers (21 CFR 178.2010) to provide for the safe use of 1,6-
hexanediamine, N,N'-bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-, polymers 
with morpholine-2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine reaction products, 
methylated, as a stabilizer for olefin polymers complying with 21 CFR 
177.1520 intended for use in contact with food.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(i) that this action is 
of the type that does not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an 
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
required.

    Dated: October 16, 1997.
Alan M. Rulis,
Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 97-29347 Filed 11-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
**Exhibit 32.2**

**COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**Certification of Co-CEO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of Comprehensive Care Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2009 (the “Report”), Clark A. Marcus, as Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
#### Thomas Lanier SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-771.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 7, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; James M. Reasbeck, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.