alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005106EN.01001501.xml

| 27.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 106/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 106/15

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 637/2005

of 26 April 2005

determining the allocation of export licences for certain milk products to be exported to the Dominican Republic under the quota referred to in Article 20a of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 of 26 January 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products (2), and in particular Article 20a(11) thereof,

Whereas:

Article 20a of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 determines the procedure for allocating export licences for certain milk products to be exported to the Dominican Republic under a quota opened for that country. Applications submitted for the 2005/2006 quota year cover quantities greater than those available. As a result, allocation coefficients should be set for the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities covered by export licence applications for the products referred to in Article 20a(3) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 submitted for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 shall be multiplied by the following allocation coefficients:

| — | 0,787132 for applications submitted for the part of the quota referred to in Article 20a(4)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999, |
| --- | --- |

—

0,787132 for applications submitted for the part of the quota referred to in Article 20a(4)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999,

| — | 0,062633 for applications submitted for the part of the quota referred to in Article 20a(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999. |
| --- | --- |

—

0,062633 for applications submitted for the part of the quota referred to in Article 20a(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 April 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 558/2005 (OJ L 94, 13.4.2005, p. 22).

2

---
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 75, 978

EX PA R TE JAV I ER M A D R I D , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 2 0 0 3 0 D0 2 1 0 9 - 3 4 6 - 1 I N T HE 3 4 6 TH DI S TR I CT COURT

FROM EL P ASO CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of murder and sentenc ed to six ty (60) y ear s’ i mprisonment. The Eig ht Court of Appeals aff irmed his conviction. Madrid v . S tate , N o A P- 0 8
- 0 4
- 0 0 2 7 9
- CR ( T e x. Ap p . –

E l P a s o , 2 0 0 6 , n o p e t. ) ( n o t d e s ign ate d f or publication)
. Applicant conte nds that his appellate counsel failed t o timely notify him that his conviction had bee n aff

irmed and that he had a

rig ht to petition for discretionar y revie w pro se.Madrid -- 2

On Janu ary 16 , 2 00 8, thi s Co ur

t r e mand e d th is a

pp lic atio n to the tr ia l c ourt to g e t an a ff

ida vit from counse l. I n response to this order , the trial judge enter ed finding s of fac t and conc lusions of law re commendingthat Applicant be g rante d an out-of- time petition for discretionar y revie w. B a se d o n o ur

re vie w o f t

he re c or d, we find that App lic ant w a s d e pr ive d o f h is r ig ht t o f ile a petition for discr etionary revie w pro se. Ex parte Riley , 193 S.W .3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to f ile an out-of-time pe tition for discretionar y revie w of the judg ment of the Eig hthCourt o f Ap p ea l s i n Cause No. AP-08-04-00279- CR that aff irmed his conviction in Case No. 20030D02109-346-1 from the 346th J udicial District Court of El Paso County . Applicant shall fi le his petition for discre tionary revie w with the Eig ht Court of Ap pe a ls w ith in 3 0 d ay s o f t he date on

wh ic h th is C ourt ’s mand ate iss ue s.

Deliver ed: August 20, 2008 Do no t pu bli sh
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220

December 11, 2009

Mr. J. Steele Alphin

Chief Administrative Officer
Bank of America Corporation
100 N. Tyron Street
NCI-007-58-22

Charlotte, NC 28255

Re: Compensation Structures for Executive Officers
and Certain Most Highly Compensated Employees

Dear Mr. Alphin:

On October 13, 2009, pursuant to the Department of the Treasury’s Interim Final Rule on
TARP Standards for Compensation and Corporate Governance, Bank of America Corporation
submitted proposals to the Office of the Special Master regarding compensation structures (the
“Proposed Structures”) for employees who are either executive officers of Bank of America or
one its 100 most highly compensated employees, excluding those employees subject to Section
30.10 of the Interim Final Rule (the “Covered Employees 26 — 100”). See 31 C.F.R.

§ 30.16(a)(3Mii).

On December 9, 2009, Bank of America repaid its TARP obligations, ending its “TARP
period.” Id. § 30.1. Accordingly, the compensation structures for Covered Employees 26 — 100
are no longer subject to the Special Master’s review, and no determination in that regard will be
forthcoming.

In addition, as a result of the repayment, Special Master approval is not required for the
future compensation of “Top 25 Employees.” Id. § 30.16(a)(3)(i). However, payments to Top
25 Employees for their service during the TARP period remain subject to the Special Master’s
October 22, 2009, determination. Jd. § 30.16(a)(3)().. We understand that Bank of America has
agreed to comply with the Interim Final Rule and with the October 22 determination as if its
TARP period extended through December 31, 2009.

Veryfpruly, yourg¢

Kengeth R. fc Te

Office of the Special Master
for TARP Executive Compensation

ce: Mr. Thomas M. Ryan
Jana J. Litsey, Esquire
Mr. Mark Behnke
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29525]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum Project 
No. 95-10

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 2, 1997, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the participants in 
the Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (``PERF'') Project No. 95-
10, titled ``Advanced NDE for Heat Exchange Tubular Inspection,'' have 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the following 
additional parties have become members of the Project: Shell Oil 
Company, Houston, TX; and Amoco Corporation, Houston, TX.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activities of PERF Project No. 95-10.
    On November 1, 1996, PERF Project No. 95-10 filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on December 4, 1996, (61 FR 64371).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-29525 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.
                                   One Beacon Street
                                   Boston, MA 02108


                                   May 1, 2009



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC  20549


RE:  DWS Equity 500 Index VIP and DWS Small Cap Index VIP (the "Portfolios"),
     each a series of DWS Investments VIT Funds (the "Trust") (Reg. Nos
     333-00479, 811-07507)


Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the
Trust hereby certifies that the form of Prospectuses and Statement of Additional
Information that would have been filed on behalf of the Portfolios pursuant to
Rule 497(c) upon the effectiveness of Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to the
Trust's Registration Statement on Form N-1A (the "Amendment"), do not differ
from that contained in the Amendment, which is the most recent Amendment to such
Registration Statement and was filed electronically on April 30, 2009.

     Any comments or questions on this filing should be directed to the
undersigned at (617) 295-2565.


                                 Very truly yours,


                                 /s/Caroline Pearson

                                 Caroline Pearson, Esq.
                                 Managing Director
                                 Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.


cc:      John Marten, Esq., Vedder Price
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11


              TRANSITIONAL HOSPITALS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                             Three Months Ended
                                              February 28\29
                                                1997       1996
                                              ------------------
                                        (000s, except per share data)


<S>                                          <C>        <C>   
Weighted average
 common shares*                               40,697     43,702
                                            ========   ========


Net Earnings                                $  4,701   $  3,723
                                            ========   ========


Earnings per share                          $    .12   $    .09
                                            ========   ========

</TABLE>


*    Dilutive common stock equivalents are less than 3% of weighted average
     common shares outstanding.

                                                                   Page 10 of 10
#### GLENS FALLS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. H. W. KINSEY, Appellee.

No. 71-460.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 6, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Carlos RIVERA, Appellant, v. Josephine RIVERA, Appellee.

No. 71-106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 6, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01
 
                              ESS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                -------------------------------
                                                                 1994        1995        1996
                                                                -------     -------     -------
<S>                                                             <C>         <C>         <C>
Weighted average common shares..............................     29,141      31,265      37,702
Weighted average common equivalent shares:
  Common stock(1)...........................................      3,901       3,225       3,886
  Cheap stock(1)............................................      4,371       3,285          --
                                                                -------     -------     -------
Total weighted average common and common equivalent
  shares....................................................     37,413      37,775      41,588
                                                                =======     =======     =======
Net income..................................................    $ 8,381     $29,886     $21,626
                                                                =======     =======     =======
Net income per share........................................    $  0.22     $  0.79     $  0.52
                                                                =======     =======     =======
</TABLE>
 
---------------
 
(1) Earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common
    and common equivalent shares ("weighted average shares") outstanding during
    the period. Common equivalent shares consist of the Company's common stock
    issuable upon exercise of stock options (using the treasury stock method),
    except when antidilutive. Common stock issued and stock options granted
    subsequent to July 31, 1994 through October 5, 1995, (the date of the
    initial public offering) have been included in the calculation of weighted
    average shares outstanding as if they were outstanding for reporting periods
    occurring between these dates. The Company used the treasury stock method
    and the initial public offering price of $15.00 per share for these
    calculations.
#### Jerome Coanell SPURLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-426.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 25, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Robert N. Tyson, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.02




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO




SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, Jon C. Sundt, the Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of Altegris Portfolio Management, Inc. (d/b/a Altegris Funds), the General Partner of Altegris QIM Futures Fund, L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Partnership on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




Date: November 27, 2012




/s/ Jon C. Sundt


Jon C. Sundt


Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer


Altegris Portfolio Management, Inc. (d/b/a Altegris Funds)


General Partner of Altegris QIM Futures Fund, L.P.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advantage. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 23, 2011 | /s/ Kelly I. Drader                   |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                            | Kelly I. Drader                       |
|                            | President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                            |                                  |
S. 3851 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 90 McCamly 

Street South in Battle Creek, Michigan, as the ‘‘Sojourner Truth Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SOJOURNER TRUTH POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 90 McCamly Street South in Battle Creek, 

Michigan, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sojourner Truth 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sojourner Truth Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60097-60098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29367]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 
Special Emphasis Panel meeting:

    Name of SEP: ZDK1-GRB-6-J-1.
    Date: December 3, 1997.
    Time: 11:30 AM.
    Place: Room 6as-25E, Natcher Building, NIH (Telephone Conference 
Call).

[[Page 60098]]

    Contact Person: Sharee Pepper, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Natcher Building, Room 
6as-25E, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-
6600, Phone: (301) 594-7798.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personnel information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.847-849, 
Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases; Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition; and Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hemotology Research, 
National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: October 28, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-29367 Filed 11-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.1 – CEO Certification**








**ROYAL
      INVEST INTERNATIONAL CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUNT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Invest
      International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Gruenbaum, CEO of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.








By:
      /s/ Jerry Gruenbaum


Jerry
      Gruenbaum, CEO





August
      1,
      2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
      Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
Docket No. FAA - 2012 - 0330
Exhibit 77D - DWS Global Commodities Stock
Fund, Inc.

At a meeting held on May 5, 2009, the Board of
Directors of DWS Global Commodities Stock Fund,
Inc. (the "Fund"), approved a proposal to adopt, as a
non-fundamental policy, for the Fund a securities
lending policy whereas the Fund may not lend
portfolio securities in an amount greater than 33
1/3% of its total assets.



E:\Electronic Working Files\NSAR\2009\06-30-09\DWS Global
Commodity Stock Fund (annual)\03-Exhibits\77D Global Commodities
- securities lending policy.doc
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARQUISE WALKER-WOMACK,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 350 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Donald L. EAGLE, Relator, v. Marion W. GOODING, as Judge of the Circuit Court of Duval County, Florida, Respondent.

No. M-266.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 16, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
#### The SCHOOL BOARD OF MANATEE COUNTY, Appellant, v. The MANATEE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

No. 73-576.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 12, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.