58954 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 211 / Friday, October 31, 1997 / Notices

Energy Policy Act of 1992, ARCO

Products Company, a Division of

Atlantic Richfield Company, (ARCO),

Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc.

(Texaco), and Mobil Oil Corporation

(Mobil) (jointly referred to as

Complainants) have filed a Complaint

against SFPP, L.P. (SFPP).

Complainants challenge all of the

jurisdictional interstate rates and

charges of SFPP, whether ‘‘gathering,’’

‘‘trunkline,’’ or some other

classification, including those contained

in SFPP FERC Tariff Nos. 17, 25, 26, and

27 (and any predecessors or successors

to these tariffs), in addition to presently

untariffed charges exacted by SFPP that

are properly subject to the

Commission’s jurisdiction under the

ICA.

Complainants assert that SFPP

violated and continues to violate

Sections 1(5), 2, 3(1), 4, 6, and 8 of the

ICA by:

(a) Establishing and charging unjust

and unreasonable rates for its

jurisdictional services;

(b) Charging unduly discriminatory or

preferential rates and charges for its

jurisdictional services; and

(c) Assessing untariffed rates and

charges for jurisdictional interstate

services. 49 U.S.C. app. §§ 1(5), 2, 3(1),

4, 6, and 8 (1994).

Complainants request that SFPP be

ordered to reduce its rates and pay

refunds, reparations, damages, and

attorneys’ fees in accordance with the

ICA, including Sections 8, 9, 15, and 16

of the ICA, and such other relief as may

be appropriate in this proceeding.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said complaint should file a

motion to intervene or a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 214

and 211 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure 18 CFR 385.214,

385.211. All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before November

21, 1997. Protests will be considered by

the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. Answers

to this complaint shall be due on or

before November 21, 1997.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–28843 Filed 10–30–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER97–886–000]

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration

Partners, L.P.; Notice of Issuance of

Order

October 28, 1997.

Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration

Partners, L.P. (Brooklyn) filed an

application for authorization to sell

power at market-based rates, and for

certain waivers and authorizations. In

particular, Brooklyn requested that the

Commission grant blanket approval

under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future

issuances of securities and assumptions

of liabilities by Brooklyn. On October

15, 1997, the Commission issued an

Order Conditionally Accepting for

Filing Proposed Market-Based Rates

(Order), in the above-docketed

proceeding.

The Commission’s October 15, 1997

Order granted the request for blanket

approval under Part 34, subject to the

conditions found in Ordering

Paragraphs (D), (E), and (G):

(D) Within 30 days of the date of this

order, any person desiring to be heard

or to protest the Commission’s blanket

approval of issuances of securities or

assumptions of liabilities by Brooklyn

should file a motion to intervene or

protest with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First

Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.

(E) Absent a request to be heard

within the period set forth in Ordering

Paragraph (D) above, Brooklyn is hereby

authorized, pursuant to section 204 of

the FPA, to issue securities and assume

obligations or liabilities as guarantor,

indorser, surety or otherwise in respect

of any security of another person;

provided that such issue or assumption

is for some lawful object within the

corporate purposes of Brooklyn,

compatible with the public interest, and

reasonably necessary or appropriate for

such purposes.

(G) The Commission reserves the right

to modify this other to require a further

showing that neither public nor private

interests will be adversely affected by

continued Commission approval of

Brooklyn’s issuances of securities or

assumptions of liabilities * * *.

Notice is hereby given that the

deadline for filing motions to intervene

or protests, as set forth above, is

November 14, 1997.

Copies of the full text of the Order are

available from the Commission’s Public

Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–28897 Filed 10–30–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP98–38–000]

Colorado Interstate Gas Company;

Notice of Request Under Blanket

Authorization

October 27, 1997.

Take notice that on October 20, 1997,

Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG),

Post Office Box 1087, Colorado Springs,

Colorado 80944, filed in Docket No.

CP98–38–000 a request pursuant to

Sections 157.205, and 157.212, of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205,

157.212) for authorization to operate in

interstate commerce the Big Thompson

Delivery Point, previously constructed

and operated to effectuate transportation

services performed pursuant to Section

311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act

(NGPA), under CIG’s blanket certificate

issued in Docket No. CP83–21–000

pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas

Act, all as more fully set forth in the

request that is on file with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

CIG seeks authority to operate the Big

Thompson Delivery Point located in

Weld County, Colorado. CIG states that

it believes that it would experience no

significant impact on its peak day or

annual requirements resulting from the

operation of the subject facilities in

interstate commerce, and that operation

other than strictly for Section 311

purposes can be performed without

detriment or disadvantage to CIG’s other

existing customers.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 211 / Friday, October 31, 1997 / Notices 58955

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–28838 Filed 10–30–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP98–40–000]

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company;

Notice of Application

October 27, 1997.

Take notice that on October 20, 1997,

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company

(East Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511,

Houston, Texas 77252, filed in Docket

No. CP98–40–000 an application

pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural

Gas Act and Part 157 of the

Commission’s regulations for a

certificate of public convenience and

necessity authorizing East Tennessee to

construct and operate facilities and

uprate the operating pressure of

portions of its system in order to

provide additional capacity for the

Roanoke Gas Company (Roanoke), all as

more fully described in the application

which is on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection.

Specifically, East Tennessee proposes

to construct and operate approximately

9.95 miles of 12-inch diameter loop

pipeline on its 3300-line in Washington

and Wythe Counties, Virginia and

upsize the existing Solar Saturn turbine

comressor at Compressor Station 3313

on the 3300 line in Wythe County,

Virginia from a T–1200 model to a T–

1600 model. East Tennessee also

proposes to test various segments of its

3100 and 3300 lines in order to increase

the Maximum Allowable Operating

Pressure (MAOP).

East Tennessee says that the proposed

facilities and uprating will create 10,300

dth per day of new firm capacity. East

Tennessee has provided a precedent

agreement with Roanoke Gas for 5,150

dth per day, for a term of 20 years. East

Tennessee says that it will use the

remaining 5,150 dth per day for system

reliability and flexibility until it has

sold the capacity on a firm basis.

East Tennessee proposes to charge its

existing Part 284 rates under Rates

Schedule FT–A. Further, East Tennessee

requests that the Commission make a

determination that the costs of the

facilities and uprating will qualify for

rolled-in rate treatment when East

Tennessee files its next rate case.

East Tennessee estimates that the

proposed facilities and uprating will

cost $8,642,366 and says that the project

will be financed with funds on hand

and funds generated internally.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

make any protest with reference to said

application should on or before

November 17, 1997, file with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission by

Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act

and the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure, a hearing will be held

without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that approval for the

proposed application is required by the

public convenience and necessity. If a

motion for leave to intervene is timely

filed, or if the Commission on its own

motion believes that a formal hearing is

required, further notice of such hearing

will be duly given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for East Tennessee to

appear or be represented at the hearing.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–28839 Filed 10–30–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP98–42–000]

Florida Gas Transmission Company;

Notice of Request Under Blanket

Authorization

October 27, 1997.

Take notice that on October 21, 1997,

Florida Gas Transmission Company

(FGT), 1400 Smith Street, P.O. Box

1188, Houston, Texas 77251–1188, filed

in Docket No. CP98–42–000 a request

pursuant to Sections 157.205 and

157.212 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) for

authorization to construct and operate a

new delivery point in Hillsborough

County, Florida for TECO Peoples Gas

(TECO), under FGT’s blanket certificate

issued in Docket No. CP82–553–000,

pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas

Act, all as more fully set forth in the

request that is on file with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

FGT proposed to construct, operate,

and own an additional delivery point

for TECO at or near mile post 17.7 on

its existing St. Petersburg/Sarasota

Connector in Hillsborough County,

Florida. FGT states that the subject

delivery point will include a tap, minor

connecting pipe, electronic flow

measurement equipment, and any other

related appurtenant facilities necessary

for FGT to transport for and deliver to

TECO up to 24,000 MMBtu per day and

8,760,000 MMBtu per year of natural

gas. FGT states that TECO will

reimburse FGT for the $67,000

estimated construction costs. FGT

further states that TECO will construct,

own, and operate the meter and

regulation station.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for