alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sarah AMEISEN and Herbert Ameisen, her husband, Appellants, v. ROYAL CONTINENTAL HOTELS CORPORATION d/b/a Statler Hilton Hotel, Appellee.

No. 2296.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 24, 1969.

Sherman A. Katz, of Koenig & Katz, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

William M. O’Bryan and Norman C. Roettger, Jr., of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

WALDEN, Judge.

This is a slip and fall case. The trial court entered a directed verdict in favor of defendant. The plaintiffs being aggrieved appeal from the resulting final judgment. We reverse.

We acknowledge at the outset that no new or unusual legal proposition is involved and that this writing is merely an explanation for the use of these litigants and the trial court.

We know that a party moving for a directed verdict admits for the purpose of the motion not only the facts shown by the evidence, but also every reasonable inference favorable to the adverse party that the jury might fairly arrive at from the evidence. In other words, in such case the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom must be viewed in a light most favorable to the party moved against. Applying this rule and recognizing the other limitations upon the trial court in directing a verdict,1 we conclude that the trial court erroneously withdrew this case from the jury. Resolving the conflict in plaintiffs’ favor, there was sufficient evidence produced which would create a jury question as to the improper maintenance which created a dangerous condition upon defendant’s floor, which caused plaintiff’s wife to slip and fall.2 This testimony is found in the record and discussed in the *464briefs and we feel that no purpose would be served in restating it here.

The judgment appealed is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

1

. See 32 Fla.Jur., Trial, § 83 et seq.

2

. Fritts v. Collins, Fla.App.1962, 144 So. 2d 850; Ladenson v. Eder, Fla.1967, 195 So.2d 211.
**Exhibit 13(1)**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**WITH RESPECT TO THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F**

**FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013**

**OF CHINA ENTERPRISES LIMITED**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,United States Code), the undersigned officer of China Enterprises Limited, a Bermuda company (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

Date: March 25, 2015 

 

The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officer.
Order entered March 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00640-CR

QUINCY NATHANIEL JONES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-45744-Y

ORDER

The reporter’s record was initially due September 22, 2018. On September 26, 2018, we 

notified court reporter Vearneas Faggett by postcard and directed her to file the reporter’s record 

by October 26, 2018. When the reporter’s record was not filed by that date, we ordered Ms. 

Faggett to file the complete reporter’s record by December 7, 2018 and cautioned her that she 

may be ordered not to sit if the record was not timely filed. On December 6, 2018, Ms. Faggett 

filed an extension request that we granted making the reporter’s record due on December 28, 

2018. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and we have had no communication from 

Ms. Faggett.

Therefore, we ORDER that Vearneas Faggett NOT SIT as a court reporter until she has 

filed the complete reporter’s record in this appeal.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Chika Anyiam, 

Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 7; to the Honorable Lela Lawrence Mays, Presiding 

Judge, 283rd Judicial District Court; Vearneas Faggett, official court reporter, 283rd Judicial 

District Court; to the Dallas County Auditor’s Office; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
No. 9655.

#### Shale et al *v.*Ostendorf et al.

(Decided October 23, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

*Messrs. Meyer &*Mooney, for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Foran, McTighe, Pearson & Marvin,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
# October 2008 - November 2010
Exhibit 23.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-169943 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-162223 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 25, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of CreXus Investment Corp., and the effectiveness of CreXus Investment Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CreXus Investment Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2010.











/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


New York, New York


February 25, 2011
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
WRASP 31, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerFebruary
      22, 2011
Exhibit 31.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Charles S. MacFarlane, certify that:



1.       I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Otter Tail Corporation;



2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report.



Date: May 15, 2017



|/s/ Charles S. MacFarlane             | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Charles S. MacFarlane                 | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer |
Hawaii (U.S.)

0 250 500 1,000 km

±

l'Atlas Environnemental de l'Amérique du Nord -

Couverture Terrestre, 2005

Forêt de conifères tempérée ou subpolaire

Forêt de conifères (taïga) ou subpolaire

Forêt de feuillus sempervirente tropicale ou subtropicale

Forêt de feuillus caducifoliée tropicale ou subtropicale

Forêt de feuillus caducifoliée tempérée ou subpolaire

Forêt mixte

Arbustaie tropicale ou subtropicale

Arbustaie tempérée ou subpolaire

Prairie tropicale ou subtropicale

Prairie tempérée ou subpolaire

Prairie à lichens et à mousses polaire ou subpolaire

Lande à lichens et à mousses polaire ou subpolaire

Terre humide

Terre agricole

Terres stérile

Milieu urbain et bâti

Eau

Neige et glace

Arbustaie à lichens et à mousses polaire ou subpolaire

Couverture terrestre de l’Amérique du Nord à 250 mètres, 2005

Source:

Natural Resources Canada/Canadian Centre for Remote Sensing

(NRCan/CCRS), United States Geological Survey (USGS);

Insituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI), Comisión

Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad

(CONABIO) and Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR). 2010.

Ce GeoPDF a été créé le 9 mars 2010 par la Commission de coopération environnementale

Projection équivalente de Lambert
CONNECTICUT - AGENCY CONTACTS

1

CT FHWA FHWA EFL PDC

member

Jacinda Russell Access Program Manager Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov 571-434-1543

CT State CDOT PDC

member

David Elder Planner, Office of 

Strategic Planning and 

Projects

David.Elder@ct.gov 860-594-2139

CT LPA Sam Gold PDC

member

Lower CT River Valley 

COG

Executive Director sgold@rivercog.org 860-581-8554

CT FHWA FHWA EFL Lewis Grimm Planning Team Leader Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov 703-404-6289

CT FHWA FHWA-DO Erik Shortell Asst. Transportation 

Planner

erik.shortell@dot.gov 860-494-7578

CT FHWA FHWA-DO Kurt Salmoiraghi Program Development 

Team Leader

kurt.salmoiraghi@dot.gov 860-494-7561

CT FHWA FHWA-DO Barbara Breslin DDA barbara.breslin@dot.gov 401-258-4546

CT FLMA NPS Amanda Jones Northeast Region FLTP 

Coordinator

Amanda_Jones@nps.gov 610-274-8205

CT FLMA FWS Carl Melberg Regional FLTP 

Coordinator

Carl_Melberg@fws.gov 413-253-8586

CT FLMA FWS Nathan Beauchamp US Fish and Wildlife 

Transportation Program 

Analyst

Nathan_Beauchamp@fws.gov 703-358-2226

CT FLMA USFS James Forseth Transportation Engineer, 

Region 9

James.Forseth@usda.gov 414-297-1170

CT FLMA DOD (USACE) Mike Vissichelli Regulatory Appeals 

Review Officer

Michael.G.Vissichelli@usace.army.mil 347-370-4663

CT FLMA DOD (nonUSACE)Douglas Briggs Senior Engineer/

HND-SDDCTEA

Douglas.E.Briggs.civ@mail.mil 618-220-5229
No. 10132.

#### The Cincinnati Traction Co. *v.*Kress.

(Decided January 15, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton County.

*Messrs. Outcalt & Foraker*and *Mr. J. W. Heintsman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. D. D. Woodmansee*and *Mr. Fred.*Herten*stein,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Prtce, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3639 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3639

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  2075 West Stadium Boulevard in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as the ``Robert 
                          Hayden Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ROBERT HAYDEN POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2075 West Stadium Boulevard in Ann Arbor, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Robert Hayden Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert 
Hayden Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Corrpro Companies, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         (a)      The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.



Dated: June 30, 2003                   /s/ Joseph W. Rog
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Joseph W. Rog
                                       Chief Executive Officer

         The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is being filed
as part of the Form 10-K.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(b)

                        FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
          Revised Schedule of Executive Officers Who Have Entered into
                      Certain Change in Control Agreements

A.       Benefit -- 3x Base Plus Bonus:

         Eugene M. McQuade
         H. Jay Sarles
         Anne M. Finucane
         Brian T. Moynihan
         M. Anne Szostak

B.       Benefit -- 2x Base Plus Bonus:

         Ernest L. Puschaver
         Douglas L. Jacobs
Blueprint





 







Exhibit 10.4

 


 

 



AMENDMENT # 1 TO THE SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT, REGISTRATION
RIGHTS AGREEMENT, AND CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE DATED NOVEMBER
20, 2017

 


 

 


THIS
AMENDMENT #1 (the “Amendment”) TO THE SECURITIES
PURCHASE AGREEMENT, REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT, AND CONVERTIBLE
PROMISSORY NOTE dated November 20, 2017, is made effective as of
December 19, 2017, by and between Sincerity Applied Materials
Holdings Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”),
and Auctus Fund, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the
“Holder”) (collectively, the
“Parties”).

 



BACKGROUND

 



A.           

The Company and
Holder are the parties to that certain securities purchase
agreement (the “SPA”), registration rights agreement
(“RRA”), and convertible promissory note in the
principal amount of $112,500.00 (the “Note”), all dated
November 20, 2017; and





 



B.           

The Parties desire
to amend the SPA, RRA, and Note, as set forth expressly below, to
acknowledge the actual date of closing of the transactions
contemplated by the SPA, RRA, and Note.





 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the execution and delivery of the
Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree
as follows:

 



1.           

All references in
the SPA, RRA, and Note to November 20, 2017 shall be replaced with
December 19, 2017.





 



2.           

This Amendment
shall be deemed part of, but shall take precedence over and
supersede any provisions to the contrary contained in the SPA, RRA,
and Note. Except as specifically modified hereby, all of the
provisions of the SPA, RRA, and Note, which are not in conflict
with the terms of this Amendment, shall remain in full force and
effect.





 



[Signature page to follow]

 


 




 








 






 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the date first above written.

 

Sincerity
Applied Materials Holdings
Corp.                                                  
Auctus Fund, LLC

 


 

 



By: /s/ Zhang
Yiwen                                                                                 

By: /s/ Lou Posner







Name: Zhang
Yiwen                                                                                 

Name: Lou
Posner







Title: Chief
Executive
Officer                                                                                 

Title: Managing
Director
Item 77C  DWS RREEF Real Estate Fund, Inc.

Registrant incorporates by reference to its
Proxy Statement filed on April 7, 2009 (SEC
Accession No. 0000950123-09-006161).
A Special Meeting of Stockholders of DWS
RREEF Real Estate Fund, Inc. (the "Fund")
was held on May 20, 2009 at the New York
Marriott East Side, 525 Lexington Avenue,
New York, New York 10017. The following
matter was voted upon by the Stockholders
of the Fund (the resulting votes are
presented below).
1. The approval of the liquidation and
dissolution of DWS RREEF Real Estate
Fund, Inc. pursuant to a plan of Liquidation
and Dissolution:

Number of Votes:
For
2,898,268
Abstain
123,457

As indicated above, the proposal to liquidate
the Fund was not approved. Therefore, the
Fund will continue to exist as a closed-end
registered investment company in
accordance with its stated investment
objective and policies.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         585,686
<SECURITIES>                                   633,513
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,664
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,572,201
<PP&E>                                         4,694,793
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,594,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          52,103
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,806,763
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,735,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,594,101
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,081
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  992,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (856,433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (856,433)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (856,433)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
Pre-Project Planning Worksheet 

I. General Project Information

1. Project name: ______________________________________________________

2. TTP route number: ____________

3. Type of work:______________________________________________________

(Resurfacing, signalization, reconstruction, etc.) 

______________________ 

Length or area: _____________ 

Historical cost for type of work: _________________ 

PS&E (usually between 10-25% of the overall project costs) $__________ 

CE (usually between 10-15% of the overall project costs) $_____________ 

 Estimated Project Cost: $_______________ 

(Use these estimates for documenting the project in the TTIP) 

II. Purpose and need of project: (Answer these two questions: (1) What is the problem? (2) What

are the consequences of not addressing the problem?

. 

. 

Cooperation with other government agencies needed? __ Yes __ No 

Agency name: ______________________________________________ 

Is project regionally significant? __ Yes __ No 

Note: Regionally significant projects are typically projects anywhere in the State that 

have direct impact on a regional transportation system or those projects that serve 

regional transportation needs (e.g., major activity centers, major planned developments 

such as major retail malls, sport complexes, employment centers, or transportation 

terminals) and are normally part of the metropolitan or regional transportation network 

model. For more information contact the State Department of Transportation or the 

Metropolitan Planning Organization in your area. 

III. Existing Facility: Will facilities be impacted? Example: utilities, culverts, bridges, etc. If so,

what will the cost be for removing / replacing?

Type Estimate Cost ($)
IV. Socioeconomic/Environmental: Are any expected to be impacted?

Type Yes No

Endangered Species

Historical/Archeological

Wetlands

Public hearing needed

Other?

V. Proposed Project Development: (place a check mark next to the proposed entity to perform the work)

Type Tribe BIA 

Region/Agency

FLH Estimate 

Cost ($)

Survey

NEPA*

Preparing NEPA 

Documents

Preparing 

environmental resource 

documents

Design

Safety Audit

Power line – Overhead

Other Cost

Right-of-Way 

Relocation

Type of ROW Fee___ Non-Fee___

* FLH and BIA are Lead Federal agencies responsible for writing NEPA decision