alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 

ORAGENICS, INC. 
 2012
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 This Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is made
pursuant to Section 12 of the Plan. 
 Recitals: 

WHEREAS, the Plan was originally adopted by the Company on August 6, 2012 and approved by the shareholders on October 23,
2012; 
 WHEREAS, a First Amendment to the Plan was adopted by the Company and approved by the shareholders on May 4, 2017 to
increase the authorized shares available under the Plan from 4,000,000 to 5,500,000; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors believes
it would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to increase the authorized shares available under the Plan from 5,500,000 to 7,500,000. 

NOW THEREFORE, Section 4 titled “SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN” is hereby amended as follows: 

The reference to “5,500,000” is replaced with “7,500,000”, to reflect an increase in the shares reserved for use under the
Plan. 
 All other terms and conditions of the Plan not otherwise modified hereby shall remain in full force and effect. The Amendment was
approved by the Board of Directors on November 14, 2017 and approved by the Company’s shareholders through written consent on December 1, 2017.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-

Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David K. Grant, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 14, 2004



---

David K. Grant

President and Chief Financial Officer
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   November 2, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Patricia K. Collawn               |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                                         |   | Patricia K. Collawn                   |
|                                         |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                         |   | Public Service Company of New Mexico  |

----
• If the information about an incident, existing conditions or practices is

inconsistent with the physical evidence, the information is less credible.

Internal and external consistency

• If a person could hear or see the thing he or she is describing from their

position or location at that time, the informatiOn is more credible.

In a position to know? Paying attention?

• A person who pays the closest attention to the whole incident is more credible.

• During the investigation, relevant information that is provided closer in time

to the time of an incident’s occurrence i stronger than information provided

later.

E.g., Excited utterances

• An investigator’s eyewitness observation of a negative occurrence is more

credible than documentation or reports to the contrary.

• An informant who gives essentially the same facts across many interactions is

more credible than an informant who tells two or more versions of the same

facts.

Is there a credible, innocent explanation for the omission or change?

• The degree to which someone has a personal interest in the outcome of the

investigation is a consideration; those with the least amount of interest are

more credible.

Motive or bias?

• Admissions against personal interest are more credible.

* Mothfidfroin G&ieral Invesligation Skills, Wisconsin DJ-JFS 2002.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.30 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Instrument Amending the Treaty of 

April 2, 1998 Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ESTONIA 

Signed at Tallinn February 8, 2006 

with 

Annex 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 ESTONIA 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Instrument amending the treaty of April 2, 1998. 

Signed at Tallinn February 8, 2006; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-13, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-13, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Instruments of Ratification at Washington 

 April 7, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010. 

With annex.
|   | · | Goodwill Rich International Limited, a Hong Kong company |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Dalian Fusheng Consulting Co. Ltd., a PRC company |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Donggang Xingyuan Marine Fuel Company, Ltd. located in Dandong City, Liaoning Province, and established in April 2008 under the laws of the PRC). |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Xiangshan Yongshi Nanlian Petrol Company, Ltd. (located in Xiangshan City, Zhengjiang Province, and established in May 1997 under the laws of the PRC). |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Rongcheng Xinfa Petrol Company, Ltd. (located in Rongcheng City, Shandong Province, and established in September 2007 under the laws of the PRC). |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Target 2012 Fund, a series of DWS Target Fund, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| March 25, 2008 | /s/Michael G. Clark                               |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|           | Michael G. Clark                                  |
|           | President                                         |
|           | DWS Target 2012 Fund, a series of DWS Target Fund |

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Target 2012 Fund, a series of DWS Target Fund, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| March 25, 2008 | /s/Paul Schubert                                  |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|           | Paul Schubert                                     |
|           | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer             |
|           | DWS Target 2012 Fund, a series of DWS Target Fund |
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00438-CV

TEXAS ENERGY OPERATIONS, LC APPELLANT

V.

RELIABLE WELL SERVICE OF 

NORTH TEXAS, LLC

APPELLEE 

------------

FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 185,768-C

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal.” It is the 

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which 

let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. 

DELIVERED: February 1, 2018

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
WRASP 31, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard A. RappaportRichard
      A. Rappaport
                Principal
      Executive Officer
                February
      2, 2010
#### Monroe Ronald LAND, Petitioner, v. CARLTON & McKINNEY, Continental Insurance Company, and the Industrial Relations Commission of the Florida Department of Commerce, Respondents.

No. 39909.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 10, 1971.

W. N. Avera, of Chandler, O’Neal, Car-lisle, Avera, Gray & Lang, Gainesville, for petitioner.

Thomas W. Barnes, of Barnes & Slater, Jacksonville, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassie, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Florida Industrial Relations Commission dated June 11, 1970, wherein the Full Commission stated:

> “This cause came on to be considered upon application of the employer and carrier for review of an Order of the judge of industrial claims dated *July 22, 1969,** * *.” (Emphasis supplied.)

The Full Commission concluded:

> “ORDERED that said Order of the judge of industrial claims dated *July 22, 1969,*be and the same is hereby vacated and set aside and the cause remanded to him for the entry of a new Order containing more detailed findings of fact so as to support the conclusion that the claimant is entitled to the payment of compensation for temporary partial disability on the present record.” (Emphasis supplied.)

Neither party had petitioned the Full Commission to review the Order of July 22, 1969, but the respondent-employer-carrier had sought review of the Order dated November 7, 1969, which Order determined petitioner to be temporarily totally disabled. Both parties in argument and briefs to this Court state that the Full Commission erroneously considered the application for review as being directed to the Order of the Judge of Industrial Claims dated July 22, 1969, gather than the Order dated November 7, 1969.

Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the Full Commission for further consideration relating to the objections raised in connection with the Order of November 7, 1969.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
# October 2008 - August 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Jacob Elhadad   the Chief Executive Officer,  and Director of Medisafe 1 Technologies Corp  , certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Registrant.





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: March 16 , 2011
Medisafe 1 Technologies CorpBy:
/s/ Jacob ElhadadName:  Jacob Elhadad

Title:    Chief Executive Officer, and Director




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 9:24 AM 

To: Wayland, Robertj; Culligan, Kevin 

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: 

Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary 

Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 

Hi Bob and Kevin, 

The handouts from this meeting are attached. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_15_GHGExisitng_LPPC_Handout1.pdf >> 

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_15_GHGExisitng_LPPC_Handout2.pdf >> 

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_15_GHGExisitng_LPPC_Handout3.pdf >> 

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_15_GHGExisitng_LPPC_Handout4.pdf >> 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: Emission 

Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility 

Generating Units 

When: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 4:00 PM-4:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). 

Where: Room 10103 New Executive Office Building 

This meeting was requested by Janet Anderson, Van Ness Feldman LLP on behalf of the Large 

Public Power Council.
Exhibit 14
 OMNIAMERICAN BANCORP, INC.
CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR OFFICERS
  1.
    
    Act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts between
his or her personal, private interests and the interests of the Company, including
receiving improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position.
 2.
    
    Perform responsibilities with a view to causing periodic reports and other
documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to contain information that
is accurate, complete, fair and understandable.
 3.
    
    Comply with laws of federal, state, and local governments applicable to the
Company, and the rules and regulations of private and public regulatory agencies having
jurisdiction over the Company.
 4.
    
    Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, and diligence, without
misrepresenting or omitting material facts or allowing independent judgment to be
compromised.
 5.
    
    Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of the
performance of his or her responsibilities, except when authorized or otherwise legally
obligated to disclose. Do not use confidential information acquired in the course of
the performance of his or her responsibilities for personal advantage.
 6.
    
    Proactively promote ethical behavior among subordinates and peers.
 7.
    
    Use corporate assets and resources employed or entrusted in a responsible
manner.
 8.
    
    Not use corporate information, corporate assets, corporate opportunities or
ones position with the Company for personal gain.
 9.
    
    Not compete directly or indirectly with the Company.
 10.
    
    Advance the Companys legitimate interests when the opportunity arises.
Exhibit 4.3 Amendment to Sigma Labs, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan


 

Exhibit 4.3

 

Amendment to Sigma Labs, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan

  

The first sentence of Section 3 of the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan of Sigma Labs, Inc. is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

  

“Subject to the provisions of Sections 6.1.1 and 8.2 of the Plan, the total number of shares of Common Stock which may be offered, or issued as restricted stock or unrestricted stock or on the exercise of Options or SARs under the Plan shall not exceed 750,000 shares of Common Stock.” 


1
Amendment One to Employment Agreement - Snead, Jr.



EXHIBIT 10.24 (i) 
 
AMENDMENT ONE 
TO 
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 
Effective January 1, 2003, this AMENDMENT ONE TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT by and between Anthem, Inc., (the “Company) and Thomas G. Snead (the “Executive”) hereby amends the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) between the parties dated as of the 27th day of April, 2002, as follows: 
 

	1.	 	Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the termination date and inserting in place thereof the 31st day of December, 2005. 

 

	2.	 	Section 11 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting from Subsections (a), (d), (e), and (f) the phrase “for the remainder of the Term,” and inserting
in the first paragraph after the word “pay” the phrase “, for the greater of two (2) years or the remainder of the Term,”. 

 

	3.	 	All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have duly executed this AMENDMENT ONE TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT effective as of the day and year first above written. 
 
 

	 Thomas G. Snead
  
	 	 	 	 Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.
  

	
	 /s/    Thomas G. Snead
	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/    Larry C. Glasscock

	
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	  
 Name: Larry C. Glasscock
  
 Title: President and CEO
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of FX Energy, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David N. Pierce, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














/s/ David N. Pierce


David N. Pierce


Chief Executive Officer


March 7, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Willie A. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-928.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 19, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cindy J. McPike, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 6, 2006



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    CINDY J.
MCPIKE                           
|Cindy J. McPike                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### James LATIMORE, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44667.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 14, 1974.

CARLTON, C. J, and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ, concur.

ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ, dissent.