alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harvey GOODMAN, d/b/a Plaza West Apartments and d/b/a Ebbars Realty Company, Appellant, v. Caroline JARDINE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rose Wallach, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 77-481.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 23, 1978.

Charles F. Atwood, III, Miami, for appellant.

Militana, Militana & Militana, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff lessor appeals an adverse summary judgment relieving the decedent’s estate from liability for rent payments from the date of decedent’s death.

Plaintiff-appellant, Harvey Goodman, is the owner of the Plaza West Apartments on Miami Beach and the deceased, Rose Wal-lach, entered into a one-year apartment lease agreement commencing November 1, 1975. Wallach died on December 29 and defendant, Caroline Jardine, was appointed personal representative of the estate. No rental payments were made from January-November, 1976 and Goodman filed suit against the estate to recover these payments. Thereafter, he moved for summary judgment in that the only question to be determined was whether or not the subject lease agreement was a personal contract and obligation of Rose Wallach, which obligation became null and void upon her demise. After hearing argument of counsel, the judge determined that the lease was personal and entered summary judgment for Jardine. We affirm.

“The line of demarcation between contracts that are purely personal in nature . and contracts which the personal representative could complete as well as the deceased could have done, on the other hand, is not clearly defined and can only be determined in many instances by an inspection of the facts and circumstances in the particular case.” *Frissell v. Nichols,*94 Fla. 403, 410, 114 So. 431, 434 (1927).

After reviewing the facts and circumstances the trial judge determined the lease to be personal in nature and appellant has failed to demonstrate that this determination is erroneous or against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Affirmed.
SECTION C - NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES

(a) Grant Program (b) Applicant (c) State (d) Other Source

8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Total (SUM OF LINES 8-11) 

SECTION D - FORECASTED CASH NEEDS

Total for 1st Year 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 

13. Federal 

$ $ $ $ 

14. Non-Federal 15. TOTAL (sum of lines 13 and 14) $ $ $ $ 

SECTION E - BUDGET ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL FUNDS NEEDED FOR BALANCE OF THE PROJ

(a) Grant Program FUTURE FUNDING PERIODS (

(b) First (c) Second (d) Third 

16. $ $ $ 17. 18. 19. 20. TOTAL (sum of lines 16-19) $ $ $ 

SECTION F - OTHER BUDGET INFORMATION

21. Direct Charges: 22. Indirect Charges: 23. Remarks: 

Authorized for Local Reproduction

 St
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dominos, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 26, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Brandon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. BrandonDavid A. BrandonChief Executive Officer


Dated: April 27, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dominos, Inc. and will be retained by Dominos, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
No. 00-871.

#### City of Chicago Heights et al. *v.*Harper et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2005333EN.01004001.xml

| 20.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/40

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2089/2005

of 19 December 2005

determining the extent to which applications lodged in December 2005 for import licences under the regime provided for by tariff quotas for certain products in the pigmeat sector for the period 1 January to 31 March 2006 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 of 18 August 2003 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for certain products in the pigmeat sector (1), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The applications for import licences lodged for the first quarter of 2006 are for quantities less than the quantities available and can therefore be met in full. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The applications for import licences lodged for the first quarter of 2006 are for quantities less than the quantities available and can therefore be met in full.

| (2) | The surplus to be added to the quantity available for the following period should be determined, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The surplus to be added to the quantity available for the following period should be determined,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 January to 31 March 2006 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 shall be met as referred to in Annex I.

2.   For the period 1 April to 30 June 2006, applications may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 for import licences for a total quantity as referred to in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 208, 19.8.2003, p. 3. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 341/2005 (OJ L 53, 26.2.2005, p. 28).

1

---

ANNEX I

| Group | Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 January to 31 March 2006 |
| --- | --- |
| G2 | 100 |
| G3 | — |
| G4 | — |
| G5 | — |
| G6 | — |
| G7 | 100 |

Group

Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 January to 31 March 2006

G2

100

G3

—

G4

—

G5

—

G6

—

G7

100

---

ANNEX II

| (t) |
| --- |
| Group No | Total quantity available for the period 1 April to 30 June 2006 |
| G2 | 30 297,9 |
| G3 | 5 000,0 |
| G4 | 3 000,0 |
| G5 | 6 100,0 |
| G6 | 15 000,0 |
| G7 | 5 300,0 |

(t)

Group No

Total quantity available for the period 1 April to 30 June 2006

G2

30 297,9

G3

5 000,0

G4

3 000,0

G5

6 100,0

G6

15 000,0

G7

5 300,0

---
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period(s) covered in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 12, 2010 |   |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Colleen A. Zuhl     |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Colleen A. Zuhl         |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

----

----
Gaffney, Cline & Associates, Inc.5555 San Felipe St., Suite 550Houston, TX 77056Telephone: +1 713 850 9955www.gaffney-cline.comApril 19, 2018 Pampa Energía S.A.Maipú 1 - Piso 22C1084ABA Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos AiresRepública Argentina Ladies and Gentlemen: We hereby consent to the references to Gaffney, Cline & Associates and to the inclusion of our third-party letter report dated April 19, 2018, as set forth under the sections “Item 4 Information on the Company – Our Oil and Gas Business – Reserves,” “Item 19 Exhibits,” and as Exhibit 13.2 in Pampa Energía Sociedad Anónima’s (PAMPA) report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Our third-party letter report dated April 19, 2018, contains our independent audit of the proved crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids, gasoline and marketable gas reserves as of December 31, 2017, of certain selected properties in Argentina in which PAMPA holds interests. Yours sincerely,Gaffney, Cline & Associates   SOP/sop/AB-17-2023.00Pampa Energía S.A.
Exhibit 32.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of County Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary R. Abramowicz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Gary R. Abramowicz  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Gary R. Abramowicz      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                    |   |
| April 28, 2016          |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to County Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by County Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3795 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3795

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 50 
percent limitation on the deduction for meal expenses does not apply to 
 meals provided on certain fishing boats or at certain fish processing 
                              facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2024

 Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 50 
percent limitation on the deduction for meal expenses does not apply to 
 meals provided on certain fishing boats or at certain fish processing 
                              facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Remote Seafood Employee Meals Tax 
Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. MEALS PROVIDED ON CERTAIN FISHING BOATS AND AT CERTAIN FISH 
              PROCESSING FACILITIES NOT SUBJECT TO 50 PERCENT 
              LIMITATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 274(n)(2)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (iii) and by 
adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(v) provided--
                                    ``(I) on a fishing vessel, fish 
                                processing vessel, or fish tender 
                                vessel (as such terms are defined in 
                                section 2101 of title 46, United States 
                                Code), or
                                    ``(II) at a facility for the 
                                processing of fish for commercial use 
                                or consumption which--
                                            ``(aa) is located in the 
                                        United States north of 50 
                                        degrees north latitude, and
                                            ``(bb) is not located in a 
                                        metropolitan statistical area 
                                        (within the meaning of section 
                                        143(k)(2)(B)), or''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
#### Michael RATNER, Appellant, v. Audrey RATNER, Appellee.

No. 73-596.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 26, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
PNM Resources

Alvarado Square

Albuquerque, NM 87158

www.pnmresources.com

LOGO

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, for PNM Resources, Inc.
(Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2010 (Report), I, Charles N. Eldred, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                             
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Charles N.
Eldred       
|                     |  |     |  | Charles N. Eldred           
|                     |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer     
|                     |  |     |  | PNM Resources, Inc.
#### Lonnie Airfornia MARION, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-986.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 7, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 9, 1973.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Richard S. Power, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The sole’point involved in this appeal is whether evidence tending to show that the accused had committed another crime was properly admitted into evidence within the test prescribed in Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654. The Williams case establishes the rule that the test as to the admissibility of evidence as to prior similar offenses is its relevancy to a material fact in issue *except where the sole relevancy is the bad character or propensity of the accused to commit a crime.*

A review of the evidence in the record on appeal reflects the State’s failure to meet the burden of demonstrating that the prior offense was “relevant to a factual issue” and was “not being introduced for the purpose of showing mere *54propensity”. See Franklin v. State, Fla.App.1969, 229 So.2d 892. The only common denominator between the crime for which defendant was being charged and the prior offense was that both incidents were robberies allegedly committed by the defendant and an accomplice with a gun during the evening. The State failed to demonstrate that the prior criminal act fell into any of the familiar categories such as proof of identity, motive, pattern or intent, or common scheme or design. See Green v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 42. Accordingly, the admission of the evidence relating to other criminal activity was error and the judgment of conviction and sentence is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for the purposes of a new trial.

Reversed.

OWEN, C. J„ and CROSS and MAGER. JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Steadfast Income REIT, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b) Intentionally omitted;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/  James M. KasimJames M. Kasim
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dominos Pizza, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 26, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Brandon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. BrandonDavid A. BrandonChief Executive Officer


Dated: April 27, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dominos Pizza, Inc. and will be retained by Dominos Pizza, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: State-of-the-art-reactor  consequence analyses project
SuDocs Number: [if !vml]>[endif]>Y 3.N 88:25/7110

Item Number:  1051-H-11  (online)
System Number: 000869120
Volume 1 
Volume 2
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  July29, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov
perm |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### GENOLA INCORPORATED OF FLORIDA and the Hanover Insurance Co., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, Respondent.

No. 73-806.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 2, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.