alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald MORRIS a/k/a John Edward Morris.

No. 61631.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 1978.

L. Howard McCurdy, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### State of Missouri, Appellant *vs.*W. B. Martindale, Respondent.

X. *Judgment, not final*— Appeal *dismissed,*— An appeal brought up without final judgment will be dismissed.

*Appeal from, Linn Circuit Court.*

*Daniel Metcalf*for Appellant.

*Geo. W.*Easley, for Eespondent.

Adams, Judge

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the indictment was demurred to, and the demurrer was sustained, but no final judgment was rendered on the demurrer in favor of the defendant. Instead of rendering final judgment, the Court ordered the defendant to stand in custody for the further action of the grand jury. There being no final judgment the appeal must be dismissed. (See State of Mo., vs. Gregory, 38 Mo., 501; 2 *W.*S., 1114, § 14.)

Appeal dismissed,

the other judges concur.
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





I, Alyson M. Mount, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Entergy Texas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), certify that:





(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of November 6, 2009 between Entergy Texas Restoration Funding, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Date: March 29, 2016





By:  /s/ Alyson M. Mount





Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
No. 00-6007.

#### Stoecker *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period(s) covered in the                Report. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 7, 2007 |   |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/                Richard M. Lavers   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Richard                M. Lavers       |
|   |   | Chief                Executive Officer |

----

**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period(s) covered in the                Report. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 7, 2007 |   |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/                Colleen A. Zuhl     |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Colleen                A. Zuhl         |
|   |   | Chief                Financial Officer |

----

----
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 213 / Tuesday, November 4, 1997 / Notices 59763

Register for Wednesday, November 8,

1978 (43 FR 52122).

Michael P. Dolan,

Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

[FR Doc. 97–29167 Filed 11–3–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–U

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury

Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service.

ACTION: Notice of members of Senior

Executive Service Performance Review

Board.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Performance Review

Board effective October 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

DiAnn Kiebler, M:ES, Room 3515, 1111

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20224, Telephone No. (202) 622–

6320, (not a toll free number)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant

to section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service

Reform Act of 1978, the members of the

Internal Revenue Service s Senior

Executive Service Performance Review

Board for senior executives in Field

Offices are as follows:

Gary Booth, Regional Commissioner,

Midstates Region

John Dalrymple, Deputy Chief, Taxpayer

Service

Marilyn Day, Regional Commissioner,

Western Region

Herma Hightower, Regional

Commissioner, Northeast Region

Robert Johnson, Regional

Commissioner, Southeast Region

John Ressler, Executive Officer for

Service Center Operations

This document does not meet the

criteria for significant regulations set

forth in paragraph 8 of the Treasury

Directive appearing in the Federal

Register for Wednesday, November 8,

1978 (43FR52122).

Michael P. Dolan,

Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

[FR Doc. 97–29168 Filed 11–3–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–U

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury

Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service.

ACTION: Notice of members of Senior

Executive Service Performance Review

Board.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Performance Review

Board effective October 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

DiAnn Kiebler, M:ES, Room 3515, 1111

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20224, Telephone No. (202) 622–

6320, (not a toll free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant

to section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service

Reform Act of 1978, the members of the

Internal Revenue Service’s Senior

Executive Service Performance Review

Board for senior executives in the Office

of the Chief Inspector are as follows:

John Balakos, Associate Inspector

General for Program Audits,

Department of the Treasury

John Dalrymple, Deputy Chief, Taxpayer

Service

Anthony Musick, Chief Financial

Officer

This document does not meet the

criteria for significant regulations set

forth in paragraph 8 of the Treasury

Directive appearing in the Federal

Register for Wednesday, November 8,

1978 (43FR52122).

Michael P. Dolan,

Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

[FR Doc. 97–29169 Filed 11–3–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–U
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS High Income Trust, on Form N-CSR; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| January 28, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark   |
|------------------|-----------------------|
|             | Michael G. Clark      |
|             | President             |
|             | DWS High Income Trust |

 

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS High Income Trust, on Form N-CSR; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| January 28, 2009 | /s/Paul Schubert                      |
|------------------|---------------------------------------|
|             | Paul Schubert                         |
|             | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|             | DWS High Income Trust                 |
#### Francis REIBER, Appellant, v. Hon. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 73-865.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 27, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of First Community Financial Partners, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that:





(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 15, 2013/s/Glen L. StiteleyGlen L. StiteleyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 10001.

#### The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. *v.*Beer, Admr.

(Decided January 22, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Crawford County.

*Mr. Dan Babst*and *Messrs. Cummings, McBride & Wolfe,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Thomas Beer*and *Mr. William C. Beer,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur. ■
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Varian, Inc.

Dated: May 9, 2006



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. EDWARD MCCLAMMY                                                         
|G. Edward McClammy Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and
will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Western Federal Lands Highway Division | Project Number: WFL TTP 2020(3)

Tribal Transportation Planning

Aligning Planning Tools with Tribal Community Needs

Introduction

Existing studies surveying transportation planners in Tribal communities have recognized two key 

planning challenges:

1. that existing planning analysis tools do not always align with Tribal community context and 

needs and;

2. that it is not always clear what benefits planning provides to transportation project selection 

and delivery in Tribal communities

These challenges are outlined in a 2020 Research Needs Statement titled Making Transportation 

Planning Applicable in Tribal Communities. This Study, therefore, seeks to align available planning 

analysis tools to Tribal community needs based on a range of contextual factors and quantify the 

benefits of planning analysis in the project selection and delivery processes. Additionally, this Study 

seeks to ensure any findings optimize Tribal Transportation Program (TTP) funding decision-making in 

Tribal communities. The audience for the Study is primarily Tribal planning staff and, secondarily, 

FHWA’s Office of Tribal Transportation staff and other federal agencies and partners.

Goals

Recognizing the diversity of population size, geography, and needs across Tribal communities, this 

study will analyze the transportation project development lifecycle (planning through design, construction, and maintenance) to understand which planning analysis tools best serve Tribal communities needs and to what effect. The specific Study goals are to:

1. Align planning tools to the specific Tribal planning need

2. Ensure long-range transportation plans are implementable by Tribal staff

3. Link planning phase to project design, construction, and maintenance

Scope

The major tasks for this Study are organized around progressive research memoranda culminating in 

a final report. The research is guided by a cross-USDOT project management team and a Technical 

Advisory Committee (TAC) composed of Tribal planning staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and other 
Western Federal Lands Highway Division | Project Number: WFL TTP 2020(3)

Tribal Transportation Planning

Aligning Planning Tools with Tribal Community Needs

stakeholders. The key tasks are 

shown in the graphic to the right.

How to Engage

The Study’s anticipated timeline is 

three years (June 2020 through 

June 2023), with TAC, site visit, and 

professional conference engagement throughout. For more information on the Study, Office of 

Tribal Transportation, or Office of 

Federal Lands, visit the following 

websites:

• Project Website

• Office of Tribal Transportation

• Office of Federal Lands

Contacts

To stay up to date on the project, visit this project page regularly and contact the Project Manager, 

Cole Grisham, for more information.

Project Champion

Misty Klann | Program Planning Specialist

FHWA Office of Tribal Transportation 

misty.klann@dot.gov| 202.507.3525

Project Manager

Cole Grisham, AICP | Transportation Planner

FHWA Western Federal Lands

nicholas.grisham@dot.gov | 360.619.7746
# In\ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Habtamu Daniel, ) ) 

### Plaintiff, ) ) 

### v. ) ) 

### NorthernVirginia Community College ) Financial Officer and Police Officer, ) ) 

### Defendants. ) Civil Action No.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED MAY 1 3 2010 Clerk, U.S. District &Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia 

# 10 U776

The plaintiffhas filed a pro se complaint and an application to proceed without prepayment offees. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In his one-page complaint, the plaintiffobliquelyrefers to what appears to be a prior dispute over financial aid to attend the Northern Virginia Community College, states that he was "told by [another] court not to call or write the college as part of[his] probation," and asks this court "to refund the financial aid that this lady took," in the amount of$866. Compl. at 1. In addition, he alleges that the college financial aid officer called the "police," who beathim and



# . , ,. sent him tojail, and he asks this court to bring tojusticethe "police officer" who "prevented [himlfrom going to school and trying to ruin[ his] luck." 

### Id. Unlike state courts ofgeneraljurisdiction, federal district courts have limitedjurisdiction. A federal district court hasjurisdictionin civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties ofthe United States. 

### See 28 U.S.C. 

### § 1331. Here, the complaint appears to arise from alleged wrong-doing by the college's financial aid and some kind ofpublic orprivate "police officer." It is not clear from the complaint whetherthe officer mentioned in the complaint wasacting under color ofstate law. Ifhe was not acting under color ofstate law, then the complaint does not appear to allege any violation ofthe Constitution, laws ortreaties ofthe United States. If, however, the officer was acting under color ofstate law, then the complaint alleges a violation offederal law, but is lodged in the wrong district and will be dismissed for improper venue. See 28 U.S.c. 

### § 1391(b). A federal district court also hasjurisdiction overcivil actions inmatters where the controversy exceeds $75,000 and where there is complete diversity ofcitizenship among the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Here, although it appears that the plaintiffand unnamed defendants appear to be citizens ofdifferent states, the plaintiffhas alleged only $866 as an amount in controversy. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the complaint, without prejudice, because it does not establish that this Court has subject matterjurisdiction orthat venue in this Court is proper. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

Date: 

# ti-;'vt!!

2
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

**Waterfowl Identification in the Central Flyway**

##       Cinnamon Teal    

----

****

**Body:** Cinnomon body. **Wings:** Wing identical     to male Blue-wing. In fall the male Cinnamon Teal is similar to the male Blue-wing     except with blotches of cinnamon. The female Cinnamon Teal cannot be distinguished     from female Blue-wing. **Note:** Rare east of the Rocky Mountains.   

----

Previous Section
Return to Contents
Next Section

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/waterfwl/cinnamon.htm		Page Contact Information: Webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 03-Aug-2006 11:32:16 EDT		Menlo Park, CA [caww54]
Exhibit 32.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of County Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy J. Schneider, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Timothy J. Schneider |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Timothy J. Schneider     |   |
| President                |   |
|                     |   |
| April 28, 2016           |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to County Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by County Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**
**FAA -**  **20 13**  **- 0938**  Docket Number
**20 12**  **- SW**  **- 057**  **- AD**  Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM Eurocop ter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 05.00.63, Revision 1, dated June 18, 2012 .


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
#### Henry Disse, Respondent, vs. Jacob Frank, Appellant.

*1. Practice, civil*— Supreme *Court*— Submission *on record.*— A cause cannot by agreement be submitted to this Court on the record. The law requires that a statement and brief be filed.

*Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.*

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the only paper filed is a stipulation by the attorneys, by which they agree to submit the case for decision upon the record. This practice cannot be endured. As they have entirely failed to comply with the law in filing a statement and brief, the appeal will be dismissed.

The other Judges concur, except Judge Sherwood, who is absent.