alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

Motion of AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1995-569 for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7)

MOTION OFAMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDERRULE 12
Communications with respect to this document shouldbe sent to: DANIEL P. GARTON President American EagleAirlines, Inc. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5494 DFW Airport, Texas 75261 KATHLEEN SOLED Vice President &General Counsel American Eagle Airlines, Inc. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5494 DFW Airport, Texas 75261 (817) 967-1574 kate.soled@aa.com May 10, 2013 FRANCIS C. HEIL SeniorAttorney American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5642 francis.heil@aa.comBEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

Motion of AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) DOT-OST-1995-569

MOTION OFAMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDERRULE 12
AmericanEagle Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, herebymoves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 1Q2013, be accorded confidential treatment andwithheld frompublic disclosure. The information for which confidential treatment is requestedpertains to AmericanEagle's airframes and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on SubmittingAirline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 41582, we are uploading our confidential report electronically to the following website: http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov On June 5, 1995, James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of Airline Statistics, the Department granted confidential treatment for a 10-yearperiodto similardata filed byAmerican-2- Airlines. For the reasons stated inMr. Mitchell's letter, the Department should grant the same relief here.

WHEREFORE, American Eaglemoves that the schedule referenced above be withheld frompublic disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 10 years.

May 10, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

FRANCIS C. HEIL SeniorAttorney AmericanAirlines, Inc. On behalf ofAmerican Eagle Airlines, Inc.
TREASURY MONTHLY LENDING AND

INTERMEDIATION SNAPSHOT

March 2009
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michiga n Appeals Reports.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

UNPUBLISHED In re BLOCK/NYGAARD , Minors. November 10, 2022

No. 360449 Gogebic Circuit Court Family Division LC Nos. 2018

- 000069

- NA 2019

- 000042

- NA

Before: S AWYER , P .J., and M ARKEY and S WARTZLE JJ

.
S WARTZLE , J

. ( concurring ).
I concur in the majority’s judgment as well as it s analysis with the exception of Section II.B. I do not quarrel with the majority’s application of current law; rather, my quarrel is with the current law itself. For the reasons I set for th in my concurring opinion in People v King
, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued October 15, 2020 (Docket No. 346559) ( S WARTZLE , J.
, concurring)
, p 7
, I do not believe that our Court should apply the plain

error test to the waiver of counsel, either in the criminal context or this quasi

- criminal context. Our Supreme Court has granted leave to hear oral argument on the application for this issue, People v King , 964 NW2d 34 (Mich, 2021), but
, based on the law as it stands today
, I must concur.

/s/ Brock A. Swartzle
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cobalt International Energy, Inc. (the Company)
for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph H. Bryant, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:
  /s/ Joseph H. BryantName: Joseph H. BryantTitle:
  Chairman of the Board
  of Directors andChief Executive Officer  Date: March 30, 2010  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41708 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN HERNANDEZ-GAMBOA, also known as Rogelio Cardenas-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-1305-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan HernandezGamboa raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29280]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors

CORRECTION: As published on Oct. 28, 1997 (62 FR 55833), the agenda for 
the meeting scheduled for Nov. 15, 1997, is incorrect. The publication 
is corrected as follows:
    9. Consider and act on the report of the Ad Hoc Committee on 
Performance Reviews of the President and Inspector General.
    a. Consider and act on procedural matters, including personal 
performance plans for the President and the Inspector General, written 
submissions prior to interviews, and interview protocols.
    Dated: October 31, 1997
Victor M. Fortuno,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-29280 Filed 10-31-97; 12:50 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of**

**Axiologix Education Corporation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

** **

** **

 

I, John P. Daglis, certify that:

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Axiologix Education Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Daglis, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.  

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

 

 

            Date:  October 14, 2011                                               /s/ John P. Daglis

                                                                                                John P. Daglis

                                                                                                Chief Executive Officer and 

Chief Financial Officer
#### In re Gustt BIBB v. STATE of Alabama. Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Attorney General.

SC 2426.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 9, 1977.

*843William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and Rosa G. Hamlett, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Charles Tom Payne, Montgomery, for respondent.

JONES, Justice.

Reversed and remanded on the authority of *Clift v. State,*Ala., 352 So.2d 838 [released this date] and *Colston v. State,*Ala. Cr.App., 350 So.2d 337, 11 A.B.R. 1974 (1977). (For a recent United States Supreme Court holding on double jeopardy, see *Harris v.*Oklahoma,-U.S.-, 97 S.Ct. 2912, 53 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1977), here distinguishable for the reasons set out in *Clift*and *Colston.)*

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Justices concur.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-1018 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Treaty Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and GERMANY 

Signed at Washington October 14, 2003 

with 

Exchange of Notes 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 GERMANY 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Treaty signed at Washington October 14, 2003; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate November 16, 2004 (Treaty Doc. 108-27, 

 108th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 March 14, 2006 (Senate Executive Report No. 109-14, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 July 27, 2006; 

Ratified by the President April 4, 2007; 

Exchange of Instruments of Ratification at Washington 

 September 18, 2009; 

Entered into force October 18, 2009. 

With exchange of notes.
#### Sadie E. Bradley JONES, Appellant, v. Alfonso L. JONES, Appellee.

No. HH-425.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 13, 1978.

Joseph M. Ripley, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Joseph F. Duszlak, Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

ORDER RELATING TO RECORD ON APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s points on appeal suggest a meritorious cause but consideration thereof require analysis of the testimony presented in the trial court. There was apparently no court reporter present at the hearing. Appellant represents that she has been unsuccessful in attempting to obtain a stipulated statement. She has submitted as a record hand written notes of the trial judge. Although we have authority to dismiss the appeal for lack of a sufficient record or to summarily affirm, we nevertheless are of the view that justice will better be served in this case by affording appellant an opportunity to prepare or have prepared a proper record. There is ample authority for such procedure. See *Travelers Insurance Co. v. Agricultural Delivery Service,*262 So.2d 210 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972); *Jackson v. Granger Lumber Co.,*275 So.2d *580555 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); *In re Adoption of A. M. L.,*297 So.2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). See also Fla.App. Rule 3.6(7) and Fla.R.App.P. 9.200(b)(3) (1977 revision).

Accordingly, appellant is allowed thirty days from date hereof within which to supply this court with an adequate record, failing which the appeal will be dismissed, sua sponte. In the event action of the trial court is required during that period incident to establishing or preparing such record, then jurisdiction is relinquished for that purpose.

BOYER, Acting Chief Judge, and SMITH and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ThinkEngine Networks, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
G. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                                  /s/ Michael G. Mitchell
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Michael G. Mitchell
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  August 8, 2008
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Dan Ratner, Chief financial Officer of Cell-nique Corporation of the Registrant, in connection with the Annual Report of Cell-nique Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
TheAnnualReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 15, 2011/s/ Dan RatnerDan RatnerChief Financial Officer
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE

                       RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                                 FX ENERGY, INC.


         Pursuant to Section 78.385 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, FX Energy,
Inc., a Nevada corporation hereinafter referred to as the "Corporation," hereby
adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its Restated Articles of
Incorporation.

FIRST:   The name of the Corporation is FX Energy, Inc.

SECOND:  Article V of the Restated Articles of Incorporation shall be amended to
         read as follows:

                                    ARTICLE V
                             LIMITATION ON LIABILITY
                            OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

                  To the fullest extent permitted by the Nevada Revised Statutes
         or any other applicable law as now in effect or as it may hereafter be
         amended, a director or officer of the Corporation shall have no
         personal liability to the Corporation or its stockholders for damages
         for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer.

THIRD:   By executing these Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of
         Incorporation, the secretary of the Corporation does hereby certify
         that on June 15, 2005, the foregoing amendment to the Restated Articles
         of Incorporation of FX Energy, Inc., was duly authorized and approved
         pursuant to Section 78.390 of the Nevada Revised Statutes by the
         holders of 30,848,215 shares of the 34,647,120 issued and outstanding
         shares of common stock of the Corporation.

         The undersigned affirms and acknowledges, under penalties of perjury,
that the foregoing instrument is his act and deed and that the facts stated
herein are true.

         DATED this 5th day of October, 2005.



                                                    /s/ Scott J. Duncan
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Scott J. Duncan, Secretary
**EXHIBIT
      32.1 – CEO Certification**








**ROYAL
      INVEST INTERNATIONAL CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUNT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Invest
      International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Gruenbaum, CEO of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.








By:
      /s/ Jerry Gruenbaum


Jerry
      Gruenbaum, CEO





November
      19, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
      Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Robert Ellison CRAIG, Respondent.

No. 40920.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 21, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 244 So.2d 151.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-370-000]


Cinergy Services, Inc., Notice of Filing

November 5, 1997.
    Take notice that Cinergy Services, Inc., on behalf of PSI Energy, 
Inc. (PSI), on October 29, 1997, tendered for filing the Transmission 
and Local Facilities (T&LF) Agreement Calendar Year 1996, 
Reconciliation between PSI and Wabash Valley Power Association, Inc. 
(WVPA), and between PSI and Indiana Municipal Power Agency (IMPA). The 
T&LF Agreement has been designated as PSI's Rate Schedule FERC No. 253.
    Copies of the filing were served on Wabash Valley Power 
Association, Inc., the Indiana Municipal Power Agency and the Indiana 
Utility Regulatory Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before November 17, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29677 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,478
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,594
<PP&E>                                          10,941
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,055
<BONDS>                                          2,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,135
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,844)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,754
<SALES>                                         22,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,599
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (355)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   157
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (87)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        34
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (121)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (162)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD 

NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY 

PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

The State, Respondent, 

v. 

Nathaniel Murray, Petitioner. 

Appellate Case No. 2012-212289 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS 

Appeal from Richland County 

L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2014-MO-030 

Heard June 24, 2014 – Filed July 16, 2014 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED 

Assistant Public Defender Dayne C. Phillips and 

Appellate Defender Carmen V. Ganjehsani, both of 

Columbia, for Petitioner. 

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Assistant Deputy 

Attorney General David A. Spencer, and Solicitor Daniel 

E. Johnson, all of Columbia, for Respondent. 
PER CURIAM: We granted Nathaniel Murray's petition for a writ of certiorari 

to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Murray, Op. No. 2012-UP-228 

(S.C. Ct. App. filed Apr. 18, 2012). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently 

granted. 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., 

concur.