alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dr. Doyle F. PHILIPPE v. BROWNING ARMS COMPANY et al.

No. 60778.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 10, 1977.

In re: Browning Arms Company, et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Franklin.

Writ denied. No abuse of discretion.
Defining excellencePAC

PATIENT ALIGNED CARE TEAM

Fact Sheet

What is a PACT?

A Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) is each Veteran working together with health care 

professionals to plan for whole-person care and life-long health and wellness. 

They focus on:

PartnershipswithVeterans

Accesstocareusingdiversemethods

Coordinatedcareamongteammembers

Team-basedcarewithVeteransasthecenteroftheirPACT

How does a PACT function?

APACTisapartnershipbetweenyouandyourhealthcareteamtomakesureyoureceive

whole-personcare.Thisispersonalizedcaretomeetyourindividualhealthcaregoals.Yourcare

teamlooksatallaspectsofyourhealth.Theemphasisisonpreventionandhealthpromotion.

APACToffersmanywaystoaccesshealthcare.Inadditiontopersonalvisitswithyourprimary

healthcareprovider,youmayschedulevisitswithothermembersofyourteam.Youalsomay

haveaccesstogroupclinicsandeducationalseminars,plusawealthofinformationonthe

InternetthroughMyHealtheVet(www.myhealth.va.gov).Youcanalsocommunicatewith

membersofyourPACTbytelephoneorthroughSecureMessagingviaMyHealtheVet.

APACTachievescoordinatedcarethroughcollaboration.Allmembersofyourteamhaveclearly

definedroles.Theymeetoftentotalkwithyouandeachotheraboutyourprogresstoward

achievingyourhealthgoals.Thefocusisonforgingtrusted,personalrelationships,andthe

resultiscoordinationofallaspectsofyourhealthcare.

APACTusesateam-basedapproach.Youarethecenterofthecareteamthatalsoincludesyour

familymembers,caregivers,andyourhealthcareprofessionals—primarycareprovider,nurse

caremanager,clinicalassociate,andadministrativeclerk.Whenadditionalservicesareneeded

tomeetyourgoalsandneeds,othercareteammembersmaybecalled.

PACT: Patient Aligned Care Team 

This is our PACT with you—

to deliver excellence in every aspect of patient care.

T

www.va.gov/PrimaryCare/pact/ 

www.va.gov

IB10-370,P96441
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________

)

CRISTIAN C. BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 03-1376 (PLF)

)

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS, ) 

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________________)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [59] is

GRANTED; it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of the defendant on all

of the plaintiff’s claims; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that this Order and Judgment shall constitute a FINAL

JUDGMENT in this case; and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove this case from

the docket of this Court. This is a final appealable order. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED.

/s/_______________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

DATE: August 28, 2009 United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3741 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3741

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from restricting 
                     funding for pregnancy centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 6, 2024

Mr. Scott of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Schmitt, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, 
 Mr. Risch, Mr. Kennedy, and Mr. Braun) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from restricting 
                     funding for pregnancy centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Pregnant and Parenting 
Women and Families Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PREGNANCY CENTERS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not 
finalize, implement, or enforce, with respect to expenditures for any 
pregnancy center, the modification to section 263.11 of title 45, Code 
of Federal Regulations, as described in the proposed regulation set 
forth beginning on page 67697 of volume 88 of the Federal Register, or 
any substantially similar regulatory action.
    (b) Definition of Pregnancy Center.--In subsection (a), the term 
``pregnancy center'' means any organization, such as a pregnancy 
resource center, pregnancy help center or organization, or pregnancy 
medical center, that--
            (1) supports protecting the life of the mother and the 
        unborn child; and
            (2) offers resources and services to mothers, fathers, and 
        families, including but not limited to relationship counseling, 
        prenatal and pregnancy education, pregnancy testing, diapers, 
        baby clothes, or material supports.
                                 <all>
```
ffg_ex106.htm

EXHIBIT 10.6

 

Agreement Amendment

 

This Agreement Amendment (“Amendment”) serves to amend the consulting agreement (“Agreement”) dated February 27, 2017, by and between First Foods Group Inc. (“FIFG”), a Nevada corporation, and Attorney Harold Kestenbaum of Melville NY (“HK”), collectively the “Parties.” 

 

WHEREAS; FIFG’s focus and direction has temporarily shifted and is not right now actively engaged in the franchising arena, AND

 

WHEREAS; FIFG has not been fully utilizing HK’s expertise and anticipates that it will continue to not fully utilize his expertise and time for the near and foreseeable future, AND

 

WHEREAS; The Parties agree to amend the Agreement to reflect the current reality, 

 

THEREFORE; For goods and valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows;

 

SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

 

HK will continue to serve as a director in FIFG, with the current title of Chairman of the Board.

 

HK will continue to serve as interim CEO until a suitable replacement is named.

 

HK will not have other obligations to FIFG, other than as a director, in which role he has a general obligation and fiduciary responsibility to promote and contribute to the general welfare of FIFG.

 

COMPENSATION

 

This is to confirm that the one-time fee of 750,000 shares that has been issued to HK is fully earned.

 

The Parties agree to adjust the accrued amount owed to HK in 2017 (total for the year) from $120,000 to $40,000. This payment shall be deferred until FIFG successfully raises $1,500,000.00 or more through debt or equity financing.

 

The Parties further agree that starting in the first quarter of 2018, in lieu of $10,000.00 per month in consulting fees, HK will earn $10,000 per quarter in director fees paid on a date determined by the majority vote of the Board of Directors.

 

HK will be reimbursed on a monthly basis for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses directly associated with the performance of his duties for FIFG.

 

The Parties agree to revisit a broader set of responsibilities for HK and mutually enter into an expanded consulting agreement, if and when the Company again actively engages in the franchising business.

 

The term of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and shall expire on the original expiration date.

 

This Amendment may be signed in counter parts and by electronic or facsimile signature. In lieu of a signature, an affirmative email agreeing to this amendment shall be binding.

 

AGREED AND ACCEPTED this 26th day of December, 2017:

 

FIRST FOODS GROUP, INC.

 
	BY:	
/S/ ABRAHAM ROSENBLUM
	
	
 
	
ABRAHAM ROSENBLUM
	 
	 		 
	
BY:
	
/S/ MARK J. KEELEY
	
 

	
 
	
MARK J. KEELEY
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	CONSULTANT 	 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
BY: 
	
/S/ HAROLD KESTENBAUM
	
 

	
 
	
HAROLD KESTENBAUM
AMENDMENT
#1


TO
THE CONVERSION AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment No. 1, dated January 4, 2018 (this “Amendment”), is by and between Blink Charging Co., (f/k/a Car Charging
Group, Inc.) a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and BLNK Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“BLNK”) (referred to collectively herein as the “Parties”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and BLNK entered into a Conversion Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of August 23, 2017. All
capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given such terms in the Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the Company and BLNK agree as follows:


 


1.
Extension of Expiration of this Agreement. The sentence in the Agreement that commences with “If the Offering does
not close by 5:00 PM Eastern Standard Time...” shall be amended and replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


“If
the Offering does not close by 5:00 PM Eastern Standard Time on February 14, 2018, this Agreement shall expire and the Company
shall again owe the Debt, plus any further interest, to BLNK.”


 


ALL
OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE AGREEMENT REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.


 


Please
indicate acceptance and approval of this Amendment by signing below:


 


	BLNK HOLDINGS CO.	 	BLNK HOLDINGS LLC
	 /s/ Michael
    J. Calise 	 	 /s/ Michael D. Farkas  
	Michael
J. Calise, Chief Executive Officer
#### Charles R. BURRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1451.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 9, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 13, 1978.

Charles R. Burrell in pro per.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DOWNEY, C. J., and CROSS and BERA-NEK, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-32,498]


Lucent Technologies, Incorporated, Berg Electronics, Inc., Lee's 
Summit, Missouri; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply 
for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on 
August 20, 1996, applicable to workers of Lucent Technologies, 
Incorporated located in Lee's Summit, Missouri. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on September 13, 1996 (610 FR 48504).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Review of the 
certification shows that the name of the parent company, Berg 
Electronics, Inc., was inadvertently excluded from the certification. 
Accordingly, the Department is amending the worker certification to 
reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased 
imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-32,498 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Lucent Technologies, Incorporated and Berg 
Electronics, Inc., Lee's Summit, Missouri, who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after June 19, 1995 
through August 20, 1998, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of October 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-29211 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### SCHOOL BOARD OF PINELLAS COUNTY and Home Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Joseph A. SIKES, Deceased, Employee, et al., Respondents.

No. 44665.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 6, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADKINS, JJ., concur.

DEKLE J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1754 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1754

    To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal 
    Communications Commission to consider market entry barriers for 
 socially disadvantaged individuals in the communications marketplace 
                  report under section 13 of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2021

 Mr. Long (for himself and Mr. Veasey) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal 
    Communications Commission to consider market entry barriers for 
 socially disadvantaged individuals in the communications marketplace 
                  report under section 13 of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Measuring the Economics Driving 
Investments and Access for Diversity Act of 2021'' or the ``MEDIA 
Diversity Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. CONSIDERING MARKET ENTRY BARRIERS FOR SOCIALLY DISADVANTAGED 
              INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 13(d) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 163(d)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Considering socially disadvantaged individuals.--In 
        assessing the state of competition under subsection (b)(1) and 
        regulatory barriers under subsection (b)(3), the Commission, 
        with the input of the Office of Communications Business 
        Opportunities of the Commission, shall consider market entry 
        barriers for socially disadvantaged individuals in the 
        communications marketplace in accordance with the national 
        policy under section 257(b).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Elizabeth P. STONE et al., Appellants, v. John S. STONE, as Administrator of the Estate of Mary E. Stone, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 73-1010.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Charles Talmadage STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-702.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 5, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### SHERWOOD PARK LIMITED, INC., a Florida corporation and Sherwood Forest Ltd. Inc. of Hollywood, a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. William MARKHAM, as Tax Assessor in and for Broward County, Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-526.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 15, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: Phytoplankton  community structure in northeastern coastal waters of the United States
SuDocs Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> C 55.13/2:NMFS-F/NEC-8

Item Number:  0208-C-04  (online)
System Number: 000656246
Volume    1 
Volume    2
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  July29, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### EDWARD L. NEZELEK, INC., and the Travelers Indemnity Company, Appellants, v. EASTERN ELEVATOR CO., INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 76-887.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 22, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 4, 1978.

Stephen H. Cypen of Cypen & Nevins, Miami Beach, for appellants.

Sheldon R. Rosenthal, Miami, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The summary final judgment entered in favor of appellee, Eastern Elevator Co., Inc., and against appellant, Edward L. Nezelek, Inc., in an action to foreclose a subcontractor’s mechanic’s lien is reversed on the authority of *Mathews Corporation v. Tutten Enterprises,*343 So.2d 902 (Fla.4th DCA 1977), and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

CROSS, DOWNEY, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.
#### Ronald Emerson DILLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-684.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 5, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of The Madison Square Garden Company (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys
Transition Report on Form 10-K/T for the transition period from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or §15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 26, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Hank J. Ratner                   
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Hank J. Ratner                       
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of
the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Item 77C
DWS Equity
Income Fund
(a series of
DWS Value
Equity
Trust)

Registrant
incorporates by
reference the
Registration
Statement on
Form N-14 for
DWS Value
Equity Trust
filed on August
29, 2008 (SEC
Accession No.
0001193125-08-
187738).
A Special
Meeting of
Shareholders
(the "Meeting")
of DWS Equity
Income Fund
(the "Fund") was
held on March
27, 2009 at the
offices of
Deutsche Asset
Management,
345 Park
Avenue, New
York, New York
10154. At the
Meeting, the
following matter
was voted upon
by the
shareholders (the
resulting votes
are presented
below).

1.	Approval of
an
Agreement
and Plan of
Reorganizati
on and the
transactions
it
contemplates
, including
the transfer
of all of the
assets of
DWS Equity
Income Fund
("Equity
Income
Fund") to
DWS Large
Cap Value
Fund ("Large
Cap Fund"),
in exchange
for shares of
Large Cap
Fund and the
assumption
by Large Cap
Fund of all
the liabilities
of Equity
Income
Fund, and the
distribution
of such
shares, on a
tax-free
basis for
federal
income tax
purposes, to
the
shareholders
of Equity
Income Fund
in complete
liquidation
and
termination
of Equity
Income
Fund.

Number of Votes:
For
Against
Abstain
3,447,265.073
131,032.570
286,798.602
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: Florida,  Tampa Bay to Port Richey
SuDocs Number: C 55.418/7:11411/
Item Number:0191-B-17  (online)
System  Number: 000872497
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11411-6-1994p0.JPG
2012-06-05 12:49
63M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11411-6-1994p0.pdf
2012-06-05 12:50
21M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11411-6-1994p1.JPG
2012-06-05 12:50
68M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11411-6-1994p1.pdf
2012-06-05 12:52
23M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11411-11-1992p0.JPG
2012-06-05 12:43
61M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11411-11-1992p0.pdf
2012-06-05 12:45
19M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11411-11-1992p1.JPG
2012-06-05 12:46
66M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11411-11-1992p1.pdf
2012-06-05 12:47
22M
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  July 6, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
null

594.70734
No. 9638.

#### The United States Coal Co. *v.*Hoyle et al.

(Decided December 21, 1906.)

•Error to Circuit Court of Jefférson County.

*Messrs. Henderson, Quail & Siddall*and *Mr. A. C. Lewis,,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. E. E. Erskine; Mr. J. W. Jordan*and *Mr. Dio Rogers*for defendants in error.

Judgment modified as shown in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, modified so as to allow and permit plaintiff, the United States Coal Company, to erect' and maintain upon and across the premises of defendants, or along the line of the premises of the defendants and the adjacent land-owners, such number of service poles as shall be reasonably required for the *618proper support of the power transmitting wires of said coal company necessary to be used by said company in the proper and convenient mining by electricity of the coal now owned by it in Smithfield and Wells Townships, Jefferson County, Ohio. And it is ordered and adjudged by this court that this case be, and the same hereby is, remanded to the circuit court of Jefferson county with instructions to that court to hear evidence and determine and establish a line upon or across the premises in the petition described, or along the lines of the premises of the defendants and adjacent land-owners, upon which said poles may be erected and said wires may be strung, at such places and in such manner as will enable the coal company to properly, conveniently and economically carry on its business of mining as aforesaid, and as will not necessarily interfere with or impair the convenient use of defendants of their said premises.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.