alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005007EN.01000301.xml

| 11.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 7/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 7/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 29/2005

of 10 January 2005

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

| (2) | Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 at 11 500 t. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 at 11 500 t.

| (3) | It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 January 2005 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2.   Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of February 2005 for 6 927,342 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 January 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).

2

---
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Robert L. TOTTERDALE, Respondent.

No. 42575.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 9, 1972.

George E. Gleason, Pompano Beach, and Norman A. Faulkner, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar.

Robert L. Totterdale, in pro per.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on petition for review by The Florida Bar recommending reduction of the referee’s recommended sentence of six-month suspension to three-month suspension with no proof of rehabilitation. No argument of the matter has been requested. We have reviewed the evidence and find that the Bar’s request is reasonable.

*3Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for three months with no proof of rehabilitation and ordered to pay the costs of these proceedings.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Death Valley National Park; Advisory Commission; Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Commission Act that a meeting of the Death Valley National Park 
Advisory Commission will be held November 20 and 21, 1997; assemble at 
9:00 AM at the Furnace Creek Inn, Death Valley, California.
    The main agenda will include:

1. General Park Orientation
2. Park Updates on Issues and Projects
3. Commission Organization
4. Northern and Eastern Mojave Planning Update
5. Wilderness and Backcountry Planning Update

    The Advisory Commission was established by PL #03-433 to provide 
for the advice on development and implementation of the General 
Management Plan.
    Members of the Commission include Michael Prather and Michael 
Dorame of Lone Pine, California; Joan Lolmaugh and Alan Peckham of Las 
Vegas, Nevada; Gilbert Zimmerman of Rancho Mirage, California; Stanley 
Haye of Ridgecrest, California; Wayne Schulz of Mariposa, California; 
Sue Hickman of Yermo, California; Mark Ellis of Santa Clarita, 
California; Janice Allen of Olancha, California; Calvin Jepson and 
Pauline Esteves of Death Valley, California; Gary O'Connor of 
Goldfield, Nevada, Robert Revert of Beatty, Nevada; and Kathy Davis of 
Apple Valley, California.
    This meeting is open to the public.
Richard H. Martin,
Superintendent, Death Valley National Park.
[FR Doc. 97-29457 Filed 11-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,567]


Lee Sportswear, Inc., Plantersville (Tupelo), Mississippi; Notice 
of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on June 16, 1997 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on June 16, 1997 on behalf of workers at Lee Sportswear, 
Incorporated, located in Plantersville (Tupelo), Mississippi.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 30th day of September, 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-27077 Filed 10-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SSGI, Inc., a Florida
corporation (the “Company”), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of Larry
M. Glasscock, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Rodger Rees,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to his
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Larry M. Glasscock,
  Jr.Larry
      M. Glasscock, Jr.
                      Chief
      Executive Officer
                      May
      24, 2010/s/
      Rodger ReesRoger
      Rees
                      Chief
      Financial Officer
                      May
      24, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-428-820]


Small Diameter Circular Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, 
Line and Pressure Pipe From Germany; Notice of Rescission of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of rescission of antidumping duty administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 25, 1997, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published in the Federal Register (62 FR 50292) a notice 
announcing the initiation of an administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on Small Diameter Circular Seamless Carbon and 
Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Germany, covering the 
period August 1, 1996 through July 31, 1997. The review has now been 
rescinded as a result of the withdrawal of the request for 
administrative review by the interested party that requested the 
review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 12, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Decker, Group III, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 
20230, telephone: (202) 482-0196.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 29, 1997, the Department received a request from the 
respondent in this case, Mannesmannrohren-Werke AG (``MRW'') and 
Mannesmann Pipe & Steel Corporation (``MPS'') (collectively 
``Mannesmann''), to conduct an administrative review of Mannesmann, 
pursuant to section 19 CFR 351.213(b) of the Department's regulations. 
The period of review is August 1, 1996 through July 31, 1997. On 
September 25, 1997, the Department published in the Federal Register 
(62 FR 50292) a notice announcing the initiation of an administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on Small Diameter Circular 
Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from 
Germany, covering the period August 1, 1996 through July 31, 1997.

Rescission of Review

    On October 7, 1997, we received a timely request for withdrawal of 
the request for administrative review from Mannesmann. Because there 
were no other requests for administrative review from any other 
interested party, in accordance with section 351.213 (d) (1) of the 
Department's regulations, we have rescinded this administrative review.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 751 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675) and 19 CFR 351.213 (d) 
(4).

    Dated: October 29, 1997.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 97-29766 Filed 1-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000022698
<NAME>                        COMSAT
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         22,359
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  329,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    39,308
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               430,152
<PP&E>                                         2,950,161
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,306,257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,641,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          514,078
<BONDS>                                        603,748
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       344,442
<OTHER-SE>                                     482,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,641,157
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               281,680
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  199,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               80,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,474
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,172)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   109
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,281)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,010)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,291)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.11)

        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSE SALVADOR HERNANDEZ,

 Appellant, 

v.

ARLEON, LLC AND ISSE INVESTMENT 

GROUP CORPORATION,

 Appellee.

§

 

§

 

§

 

§

 

§

 

§

No. 08-21-00023-CV

Appeal from the

171stth District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2017DCV2709)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until July 9, 2021. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ordered that the Hon. David Pierce, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare the 

Appellant’s Brief and forward the same to this Court on or before July 9, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of June, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
#### Margaret Frances STEELE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43946.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 7, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 277 So.2d 316.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32





                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of
the undersigned certifies that the report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Cognitronics Corporation.






                              /s/ Brian J. Kelley
                              Brian J. Kelley
                              President and Chief Executive
                                Officer
                              November 14, 2003




                              /s/ Garrett Sullivan
                              Garrett Sullivan
                              Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                Officer
                              November 14, 2003
#### CORDIS CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL OF GREATER MIAMI, INC., Respondent.

No. 44822.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 11, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 285 So.2d 645.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
U
.S

. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration



### DEC 082015 Mr. David Hom ODA Lead Administrator The Boeing Company 6001 S. Air Depot, M/S R7-53 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73135 Dear Mr. Hom: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W

. Renton ,Washington 98057-3356

We have received your petition letter dated November 19,2015, requesting exemption from § 25.341(a), Amendment 25-86, ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations. This exemption, ifgranted, would allow the use ofalternate military gust criteria for the installation ofan aerial refueling boom and local attachment structure on the supplemental type certificate (STC) modified 767-2C (KC-46A) airplane instead ofthe tuned discreet gust criteria in § 25.341(a). Itis Boeing's position that the tuned discrete gust criteria of§ 25
.341(a) was derived for conventional transport aircraft and is not appropriate for the STC-modified 767- 2C aerial refueling boom, as the boom is unique military structure. This request was submitted to the Department ofTransportation's Federal Docket Management System (at Regulations.gov) on December 1, 2015, and has been assigned DocketNo. FAA-2015-6811. We are in the process ofreviewing your request and we will contact you ifwe need additional information. A summary ofyour petition will be published in the Federal Register for public comment, in accordance with the requirements of§ 11.85. You will be advised ofthe agency's decision on your petition as soon as possible. Ifyou have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact Mr. Mark Freisthler at (425) 227-1119, or by e-mail at mark.freisthler@faa.gov. Sincerely,

Deana M. Stedman Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service
# L_2006189DE.01002701.xml

| 12.7.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 189/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 189/27

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2111/2005 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 14. Dezember 2005 über die Erstellung einer gemeinschaftlichen Liste der Luftfahrtunternehmen, gegen die in der Gemeinschaft eine Betriebsuntersagung ergangen ist, sowie über die Unterrichtung von Fluggästen über die Identität des ausführenden Luftfahrtunternehmens und zur Aufhebung des Artikels 9 der Richtlinie 2004/36/EG

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 344 vom 27. Dezember 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 344 vom 27. Dezember 2005

Seite 22, Anhang, Nummer 3 zweiter Gedankenstrich Buchstabe a:

Statt:

| „a) | Prüfungen und Pläne für Abhilfemaßnahmen entsprechend dem Allgemeinen Sicherheitsüberprüfungsprogramm der IATA ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

Prüfungen und Pläne für Abhilfemaßnahmen entsprechend dem Allgemeinen Sicherheitsüberprüfungsprogramm der IATA ...“

muss es heißen:

| „a) | Prüfungen und Pläne für Abhilfemaßnahmen entsprechend dem Allgemeinen Sicherheitsüberprüfungsprogramm der ICAO ...“. |
| --- | --- |

„a)

Prüfungen und Pläne für Abhilfemaßnahmen entsprechend dem Allgemeinen Sicherheitsüberprüfungsprogramm der ICAO ...“.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



Jacob Elhadad the Chief Executive
Officer,  and Director of Medisafe 1 Technologies Corp, certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the
Registrant.



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|Date: September 28, 2012 | Medisafe 1 Technologies Corp                
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------
|                         |                                             
|                         | By:                                         
|                         | Name: Jacob Elhadad                         
|                         | Title: Chief Executive Officer, and Director



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Domain ExtremesInc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francis Bok, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: April 15, 2014

 

 

/s/ Francis Bok

Francis Bok

President

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section906 has been provided to Domain Extremes Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
#### BEAR v. GOLDSTEIN.

No. 39209.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Opinion issued January 21, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-01051-CR

NO. 01-15-01052-CR

———————————

LEINYUY ROBERT YANGEH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case Nos. 1473903 & 1473904

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Leinyuy Robert Yangeh, pled guilty to the felony offense of 

possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. The trial court found 

appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain 
2

agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to 7 years’ incarceration in the 

Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed 

a pro se notice of appeal.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial 

court’s permission to appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be 

dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has 

not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. 

The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the 

defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record 

supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must 

dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an 

appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must 

dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the 

appeal.”). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.
3

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).