alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. (the Company) on FORM 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phillip W. Ware, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        |  |                                          
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: November 11, 2010 |  | By /s/ Phillip W. Ware
|                        |  |                        |  | Phillip W. Ware                          
|                        |  |                        |  | Principal Executive Officer,             
|                        |  |                        |  | President and Principal Financial Officer

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and will be retained by Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20
                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                          OPTICAL SENSORS INCORPORATED
                          EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PAY PLAN


This Amendment No. 1 to the Optical Sensors Incorporated Executive Severance Pay
Plan is made effective as of August 15, 2000.

                                    RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors or Optical Sensors Incorporated (the "Company")
approved an amendment to the Optical Sensors Incorporated Executive Severance
Pay Plan (the "Severance Pay Plan") by unanimous written consent effective
August 15, 2000; and

WHEREAS, this Amendment is entered into to give effect to such action of the
Board of Directors of the Company;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Severance Pay Plan is hereby amended as follows effective as
August 15, 2000:

     1. Section 2.19(a)(ii)(6) of the Severance Pay Plan is hereby amended in
its entirety to read as follows:

     (6)  the Eligible Employee's termination of employment with the Company for
          any reason other than death during the twelfth month following the
          month during which the Change in Control occurs.

     2. To record this Amendment to the Severance Pay Plan as set forth above,
the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed on its behalf by its Chief
Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer as of the date first set forth
above.

OPTICAL SENSORS INCORPORATED


By: /s/ Paulita LaPlante
    ------------------------------
    Paulita M. LaPlante
    President and Chief Executive Officer

By: /s/ Wesley G. Peterson
    ------------------------------
    Wesley G. Peterson
    Chief Financial Officer
```

[112th Congress Public Law 100]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 268]]

Public Law 112-100
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To authorize the St. Croix River Crossing Project with appropriate 
     mitigation measures to promote river values. <<NOTE: Mar. 14, 
                          2012 -  [S. 1134]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: St. Croix River 
Crossing Project Authorization Act.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``St. Croix River Crossing Project 
Authorization Act''.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECT WITH MITIGATION MEASURES.

    Notwithstanding section 7(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 
U.S.C. 1278(a)), the head of any Federal agency or department may 
authorize and assist in the construction of a new extradosed bridge 
crossing the St. Croix River approximately 6 miles north of the I-94 
crossing if the mitigation items described in paragraph 9 of the 2006 
St. Croix River Crossing Project Memorandum of Understanding for 
Implementation of Riverway Mitigation Items, signed by the Federal 
Highway Administration on March 28, 2006, and by the National Park 
Service on March 27, 2006 (including any subsequent amendments to the 
Memorandum of Understanding), are included as enforceable conditions.
SEC. 3. OFFSET.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts 
made available for items 676, 813, 3186, 4358, and 5132 in the table 
contained in section 1702 of the SAFETEA-LU (119 Stat. 1288, 1380, 1423) 
shall be subject to the limitation on obligations for Federal-aid 
highways and highway safety construction programs distributed under 
section 120(a)(6) of title I of division C of Public Law 112-55 (23 
U.S.C. 104 note; 125 Stat. 652).
    (b) Rescission.--Any obligation authority made available until used 
to a State as a result of receipt of contract authority for the items 
described in subsection (a) that remains available to the State as of 
the date of enactment of this Act is permanently rescinded.
SEC. 4. BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with 
the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go-Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the

[[Page 126 STAT. 269]]

Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, 
provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on 
passage.

    Approved March 14, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1134:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-124 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            Jan. 23, considered and passed Senate.
            Feb. 29, Mar. 1, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit-32.2 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

I am the Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
EnzymeBioSystems, a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended June 30, 2011 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Form 10-K").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the amended Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the amended Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


   /s/ Anushavan Yeranosyan
----------------------------------
       Anushavan Yeranosyan
Its:   Principal Accounting Officer

Dated:  September 28, 2011
        ------------------


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (the Company) for the
period ended January 1, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 8, 2010 |  | /s/ GARY E. DICKERSON  
|                        |  | Gary E. Dickerson      
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
WRASP 31, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C.
  PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. Pintsopoulos
                Principal
      Financial Officer
                February
      2, 2010
**Exhibit 32.1**

**COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of Comprehensive Care Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endingSeptember 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2008 (the “Report”), John M. Hill, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
#### Winifred M. SLATER and Ferdinand H. Slater, Appellants, v. John Hall McGILLIGAN, Appellee.

No. 69-621.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32



Certification of Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Smartag International, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to the best of his knowledge and belief that:



(1) The Transition
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: January 14, 2013



|/ s/ Peng Keong Lim
        Peng Keong Lim
        CEO, President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
# L_2005285EN.01004201.xml

| 28.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 285/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 285/42

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1772/2005

of 27 October 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 21 to 27 October 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 October 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
Reader’s Guide for Fipronil

CRM: Susan Bartow

EPA/OCSPP/OPP/PRD

Reader’s Guide to Fipronil Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0448

Publication Date: June 29, 2011

The Agency is providing the “Readers Guide” to allow the reader to more easily access and navigate the various entries c ontained in the fipronil docket.

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents:

Docket Item 1. Federal Register Notice: Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened

for Review and Comment and Other Docket Actions.

Docket Item 2. Reader’s Guide to the Fipr onil Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0448.

Docket Item 3. Fipronil Summary Document Registrati on Review: Initia l Docket June

2011.

Human Health Documents fo r Registration Review

Docket Item 4. Fipronil. Human-Health Assessment Scoping Document in Support of Registration Review. May 24, 2011.

This document evaluates the status of the human health assessments to determine the scope of work necessary to support the registration review of fipronil.

Docket Item 5. Fipronil: Review of Huma n Incidents. March 1, 2011.

This report represents human health incidents occurring in the United States from 2002 to 2010 for the single chemical, fipronil, only.

Environmental Fate and Effects Documents for Registration Review

Docket Item 6. Registration Review - Preliminary Problem Formulation for Ecological Risk and Environmental Fate, Endang ered Species, and Drinking Water Assessments for Fipronil. May 4, 2011.

This document defines the problem for the assessment, and develops a plan for analyzing and characterizing the ecological risks.Use and Usage Information for Registration Review

Docket Item 7. BEAD Chemical Profile for Registra tion Review: Fipronil PC Code: 129121). May 25, 2011.

This document provides usage information and an overview of the pest management role of fipronil.

Docket Item 8. Appendix A: Food/Feed & Non-Food/ Non-Feed Uses Considered in Registration Review Work Planning. Fipronil (129121). November 8,

2010.

This table lists the food/feed and non-food/non- feed us es for fipronil.
Exhibit
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
      906


OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly report
      of Bio Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities
      and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to his knowledge:





1. The
      Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and





2. The
      information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      February 14,
      2008


By:
            /s/
                David
                KoosDavid
                KoosActing
                Chief Financial
                Officer





A
      signed original of this written
      statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other
      document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
      statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bio Matrix Scientific
      Group, Inc.  and will be retained by Bio Matrix Scientific Group, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





29
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Sanford GREENWAY et al., Appellees.

No. 70-812.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
#### John Willie LESTER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44364.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 26, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 281 So.2d 222.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
RE: revised chapter 6 of RIA for OMB 12/16/2011 06:32 PM From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Bob, can you get a clean version of this chapter? I'm having difficulty doing a comparison.

-----Original Message----- From: RobertJ Wayland [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 6:11 PM To: Higgins, Cortney Cc: Bill Maxwell Subject: Fw: revised chapter 6 of RIA for OMB

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/16/2011 06:10 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------| |Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US |

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------| |RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA |

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------>>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------| |Al McGartland/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, DavidA Evans/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia | |Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Alex Barron/DC/USEPA/US@EPA |

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------| |12/16/2011 06:08

PM |

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------| |revised chapter 6 of RIA for

OMB |

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------|

Bob, this version is ready to send to OMB. Note for Cortney that section 6.5 was totally revised per conversation and the redline did not make any sense. Thus, that section is presented clean for clarity of their reading.

Ron Evans Leader, Air Economics Group HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPAMail Drop C-439-02
919-541-5488 919-541-0839 fax

(See attached file: Chapter 6_EmploymentandEconomicImpacts_1216 arb 1640 clean 1755 OMB ready.docx)
#### Rebecca Lynn P. FONTENOT, Individually and for and on behalf of her minor daughter, Lisa Brook Pitre v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 62296.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: Rebecca Lynn P. Fontenot, Individually and for and on behalf of her minor daughter, Lisa Brook Pitre, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Evangeline. 357 So.2d 1185.

Denied.

TATE J., would grant writ.