alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                      Accountants' Consent
                      ---------------------


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Urban Shopping Centers, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statements No. 33-86778 (Form S-8), No. 33-96388 (Form S-8) and
No. 333-334 (Form S-3) of Urban Shopping Centers, Inc. and
consolidated partnerships of our report dated January 24, 1997,
except as to note 11 which is as of February 10, 1997, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Urban Shopping Centers,
Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1996, and the related schedule, which report is
incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1996 annual report
on Form 10-K of Urban Shopping Centers, Inc.


                                       KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP






Chicago, Illinois
March 21, 1997
No. 9762.

#### Wheeler et al. *v.*Dunham et al.

(Decided December 21, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

*Messrs. Kline, Tolies & Goff; Mr. E. F. Voris*and *Mr. C. R. Bissel,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Stephen A. Persons; Mr. C. R. Bissell*and *Messrs. Johnson & Dunlap,*for defendants'in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
### Support Block Basic Issue: Sep 26/2013 

# A605-57-004 Page 1 of 1 

### APPENDIX 2 The following data is required to manufact ure the Support Block tool if necessary, for bushing removals.
No. 9518.

#### Barleyoung *v.*The Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad Co.

(Decided November 20, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Stark County.

*Messrs. Craine &*Snyder, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Lynch, Day & Day,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the annual report of Loncor Resources Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donat K Madilo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)      The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)      The information contained
in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|               |    
|-------------- | ---
|March 30, 2012 | By:
|               |    



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Loncor Resources Inc. and will be retained by Loncor Resources Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUS

                                -----------------

                   Investors Cash Trust -- Treasury Portfolio
                      DWS U.S. Treasury Money Fund Class S
                           Premier Money Market Shares
                                Investment Class


Important Information About New Purchases

Effective immediately, the portfolio will reopen to new investors.

The portfolio  reserves the right to modify the foregoing policy at any time and
to reject or limit any investment for any reason.











               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference


April 3, 2009                                             [DWS INVESTMENTS LOGO]
MONEY-3604R                                                  Deutsche Bank Group


<PAGE>


                SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUS

                                -----------------

                   Investors Cash Trust -- Treasury Portfolio
                              Institutional Shares


Important Information About New Purchases

Effective immediately, the portfolio will reopen to new investors. Orders to
purchase shares from new investors or existing shareholders are generally
limited to no more than $50 million per business day.

The portfolio reserves the right to modify the foregoing policy at any time
and to reject or limit any investment for any reason.











               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference


April 3, 2009                                             [DWS INVESTMENTS LOGO]
MONEY-3605R                                                  Deutsche Bank Group
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1799 

To amend the Small Business Act and the CARES Act to extend the covered 

period for the paycheck protection program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Ms. BOURDEAUX (for herself, Mrs. KIM of California, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, and 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act and the CARES Act 

to extend the covered period for the paycheck protection 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PPP Extension Act 

5 of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF COVERED PERIOD FOR PAYCHECK 

7 PROTECTION PROGRAM. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7(a)(36)(A)(iii) of the 

9 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)(A)(iii)) is 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1799 IH

1 amended by striking ‘‘March 31, 2021’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘June 30, 2021’’. 

3 (b) FUNDING.—Section 1102(b)(1) of the CARES 

4 Act (Public Law 116–136), as amended by section 323 

5 of the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Non6 profits, and Venues Act (Public Law 116–260), is amend7 ed by striking ‘‘March 31, 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 

8 2021’’. 

9 (c) RESTRICTION.—From June 1, 2021, through 

10 June 30, 2021, the Administrator of the Small Business 

11 Administration shall not accept new lender applications 

12 for loans under paragraph (36) or (37) of section 7(a) 

13 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) and shall 

14 only process such lender applications that have been sub15 mitted to the Administrator before June 1, 2021. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### L. M. BELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1077.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 1, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 8, 1978.

Stanley M. Newmark, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Jester v. State,*339 So.2d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). See also *State v. Ashby, 245*So.2d 225 (Fla.1971).
EXHIBIT 31.1




CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Roland C. Smith, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Wendy’s/Arby’s Restaurants, LLC, certify that:
 
 1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Wendy’s/Arby’s Restaurants, LLC;
 
 2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:  March 19, 2010
/s/Roland C. SmithRoland C. SmithPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Code Green Apparel Corp. 10-Q


Exhibit 10.30


 





 


 



     


     


    

 





 






     2


     


    

 





 






     3


     


    

 





 






     4


     


    

 





 






     5


     


    

 





 






     6


     


    

 





 






     7


     


    

 





 






     8


     


    

 





 






     9


     


    

 





 






     10


     


    

 





 






     11


     


    

 





 






     12


     


    

 





 






     13


     


    

 





 






     14


     


    

 





 






     15


     


    

 





 






     16


     


    

 





 






     17


     


    

 





 






     18


     


    

 





 






     19
EX-4.2



 EXHIBIT 4.2 
  





 
 SHARE CERTIFICATE Certificate No. [number of shares] Shares CUSIP:M2083T 116 ISIN: CY0107501112 CAMPOSOL HOLDING PLC Incorporated in
Cyprus under the Companies Law, Cap. 113 AUTHORISED SHARE CAPITAL U.S.$589,850 Divided into 100,000,000 Ordinary shares of U.S.$0.0058985 each This is to Certify that [NAME OF THE COMPANY/PERSON WHO IS THE REGISTERED SHAREHOLDER] of is the
Registered Proprietor of [NUMBER OF SHARES] (IN WORDS) Fully Paid shares of U.S.$0.00058985 each, in the above named Company, numbered [from -to], inclusive, subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company, and that upon each of
such Shares the amount of U.S.$0.0058985 has been paid. Given under the Common Seal of the above Company, this [date] Directors Common Seal of the Company [NAME OF DIRECTOR] [NAME OF DIRECTOR] Secretary [NAME OF SECRETARY] NOTE: No transfer of any
of the above-mentioned Shares can be registered until this Certificate has been deposited at the Company’s Registered Office.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29218]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA--01747]


John F. Spooner Farms Belle Glade, Florida; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with 
Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), an investigation was initiated on May 
27, 1997 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at John 
F. Spooner Farms, located in Belle Glade, Florida (NAFTA-01747).
    The Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security has been 
unable to locate the company official at the subject firm. 
Consequently, the Department of Labor cannot conduct an investigation 
to render a determination as to whether the workers are eligible for 
adjustment assistance benefits under the Trade Act of 1974.
    Therefore, further investigation in this matter would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of October 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-29218 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-140-CV

					NO. 2-06-141-CV

IN RE ALLEN CHRISTOPHER ROMAN	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL A:	WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and HOLMAN, J.

WALKER, J. would grant the stay and request a response.

DELIVERED: April 21, 2006
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1641 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include a payment and performance 

security requirement for certain infrastructure financing, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2021 

Mr. LYNCH (for himself and Mr. BALDERSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include a payment 

and performance security requirement for certain infrastructure financing, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Infrastruc5 ture by Protecting Our Subcontractors and Taxpayers 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1641 IH

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TIFIA ELIGIBILITY 

2 AND PROJECT SELECTION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 602(c) of title 23, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(3) PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE SECU7 RITY.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall 

9 ensure that the design and construction of a 

10 project carried out with assistance under the 

11 TIFIA program shall have appropriate payment 

12 and performance security, regardless of whether 

13 the obligor is a State, local government, agency 

14 or instrumentality of a State or local govern15 ment, public authority, or private party. 

16 ‘‘(B) WRITTEN DETERMINATION.—If pay17 ment and performance security is required to be 

18 furnished by applicable statute or regulation, 

19 the Secretary may accept such payment and 

20 performance security requirements applicable to 

21 the obligor if the Secretary has made a written 

22 determination that the Federal interest with re23 spect to Federal funds and other project risk 

24 related to design and construction is adequately 

25 protected. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1641 IH

1 ‘‘(C) NO DETERMINATION OR APPLICABLE

2 REQUIREMENTS.—If a determination under this 

3 paragraph has not been made or there are no 

4 payment and performance security requirements 

5 applicable to the obligor, the security under sec6 tion 3131(b) of title 40 shall be required.’’. 

7 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this 

8 Act shall apply with respect to any contract entered into 

9 on or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

ARCA BIOPHARMA, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Michael R. Bristow, Chief Executive Officer of ARCA biopharma, Inc. (the Company), and Patrick M. Wheeler,
Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Annual
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 4th day of March, 2010.



|                                                                    |  |                                                             
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael R. Bristow                                              |  | /s/ Patrick M. Wheeler                                      
|Michael R. Bristow                                                  |  | Patrick M. Wheeler                                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted) has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Annual Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of ARCA biopharma, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7303

DANIEL L. STALEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; RICKY

HARRISON, Warden, in his official capacity;

LIEUTENANT SEWARD, in his individual capacity;

LIEUTENANT MILLER, in his individual capacity;

LIEUTENANT JENKINS, in his individual

capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 04-7304

DANIEL L. STALEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOE SEWARD, Lieutenant in unofficial capacity;

RICKY HARRISON, Warden in official capacity;

KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Defendants - Appellees.
- 2 -

No. 04-7305

DANIEL L. STALEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; LIEUTENANT

MILLER; RICKY HARRISON, Warden, in his

official capacity; LIEUTENANT JENKINS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-03-3490-9-23; CA-03-3491-9-23; CA-03-3492-9-23)

Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 2, 2005

Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel L. Staley, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Penn Engen, MCCUTCHEN,

BLANTON, JOHNSON & BARNETTE, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Daniel L. Staley appeals from the orders of the district

court in these three actions, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000).

The district court referred these cases to a magistrate judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). In each case the

magistrate judge recommended that the complaint be dismissed as

frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000), and advised

Staley that failure to file specific objections to this

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court

order based on the recommendation. Despite this warning, in each

case Staley failed to file specific objections to the magistrate

judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections

to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the

parties have been warned that failure to object will waive

appellate review. See Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th

Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Staley

has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections

after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment

of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED