alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit (e)(ii)**

**SCUDDER VALUE SERIES, INC.**

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0010

 

Scudder Distributors, Inc.

222 South Riverside Plaza

Chicago, IL 60606

 

|   | December 20, 2004 |
|--------|-------------------|

 

Underwriting Agreement

 

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Scudder Value Series, Inc. (hereinafter called the “Fund”) is a corporation organized under the laws of Maryland and is engaged in the business of an investment company.  The authorized capital of the Fund consists of shares of common stock, with par value of $0.01 (“Shares”), currently divided into three portfolios (each a “Series”).  The Series and, if applicable, the classes thereof to which this agreement applies are included under Schedule A.  Shares may be divided into additional Series of the Fund and the Series may be terminated from time to time.  The Fund has selected you to act as principal underwriter (as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(29) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)) of the Shares and you are willing to act as such principal underwriter and toperform the duties and functions of underwriter in the manner and on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.  Accordingly, the Fund hereby agrees with you as follows:

1.         Delivery of Documents.  The Fund has furnished you with copies properly certified or authenticated of each of the following:

|   | (a) | Articles of Amendment and Restatement, dated July 12, 2002, as amended to date. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | By-Laws of the Fund as in effect on the date hereof. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (c) | Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Fund selecting you as principal underwriter and approving this form of Agreement. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

----
Letter Agreement



 
Exhibit 10.16

 
October 21, 2002 
 
Ms. Marsha Paolini 
Vice President 
Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company 
135 Santilli Highway,
026-0313 
Everett, MA 02149 
 
Dear Marsha: 
 
It is with pleasure that I am writing you to inform you that our Benefit Plans Investment Committee (the
“BPIC”) has approved your firm, Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company, as the new Trustee and Custodian for its Sunoco, Inc. Master Retirement Trust, Directors’ Deferred Compensation and Benefits Trust (Rabbi) and Deferred
Compensation and Benefits Trust (Rabbi). 
 
This
appointment comes with a great amount of respect for the people and the process that has created the successful business model that you have today. 
 
On behalf of the BPIC, we are looking forward to a successful relationship with you and Boston Safe. 
 
Please indicate Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company’s
acceptance of its appointment as Trustee/Custodian by signing and returning to me one of the two signed copies of this letter. The other signed copy is for your records. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
 
s/Alan J.
Rothman 
Alan J. Rothman 
Benefit Plans Investment Committee 
Director, Trust Investments 
 
 
Accepted: 
 
BOSTON SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUST COMPANY

 
 

	 By:
	 	 s/Marsha R. Paolini

	
	 Title:
	 	 Vice President

	
	 Date:
	 	 10/22/02
U.S. Department 

Of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration

400 Seventh St., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

October 27, 1993 

Refer to: HNG-14/SS-38 

Mr. Herbert J. Henry 

Telespar Product Manager 

Unistrut Corporation 

35660 Clinton Street 

Dear Mr. Henry: 

Thank you for your September 23 letter to Mr. James H. Hatton, Jr., requesting 

acceptance of a revised Telespar post and slip-base assembly as meeting Federal 

Highway Administration’s breakaway requirements. Our acceptance of the original 

three-bolt, slip-base design was dated May 1, 1991. The revised design shown on the 

enclosed drawings, uses heavier gauge base and sign posts as well as a heavy-duty cast 

iron slip-base assembly. 

Specifically, the hardware consists of a TL-200-B5B5 slip-base assembly with 76-mm x 

76-mm x 4.76-mm ( 3-inch x 3-inch x 3/16-inch) structural tubing for both base post and 

sign post. The TL-200-B5B5 is composed of two cast iron TL-199-B-5 sub-assemblies, a 

Teflon keeper plate between the sub-assemblies, two stainless steel bushings around each 

attachment bolt, (one above and one below the keeper plate), and two plate washers, (one 

under the head and one under the nut of each of the three attached bolts). The surfaces in 

contact with the Teflon keeper plate are milled flat. The TL-199-B5 has thicker slip 

plates than your company’s previous sum-assemblies [19-mm versus 13-mm (3/4-inch 

versus 1⁄2-inch)]. 

We note that the mass of the components in the new design is greater than that of the 

previously accepted design. However, it does not begin to approach that of the typical 

large ground-mounted sign supports that commonly use slip-base breakaway technology. 

Since the accepted design resulted in low test occupant impact velocities, we conclude 

that the moderate increase in post mass would not results in the new design causing 

unacceptable occupant impact velocities if it were to be tested. Therefore, based on the 

successful testing of the lighter gauge breakaway three-bolt slip-bases and the similarities 

between the cast design and the accepted fabricated design, we find the new design 

acceptable for use on the National Highway System (NHS) if requested by a State. 
A caution is appropriate for all of your company’s cast iron slip-base assemblies. While 

you state that the slip plane surfaces will be milled smooth, and the drawings show that 

the galvanizing is to be wiped smooth of these surfaces, no mention is made of the 

opposite surfaces ob the sub-assemblies. Since the clamping forces of the bolts and 

washers act on these surfaces, they too, must be smooth enough to permit the washers to 

slide. We assume that your company’s quality control is sufficient to assure that there are 

no irregularities between these surfaces and the washers that would increase friction over 

your earlier designs. 

All other conditions in our earlier letter on the Unistrut three-bolt slip-base are applicable. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 Lawrence A. Staron, Chief 

 Federal-Aid and Design Division 

3 Enclosures (Drawing Sheets) 

Geometric and Roadside Design Acceptance Letter SS-38
No. 9620.

#### Eberling et al. *v.*Cole.

(Decided October 9, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

*570
      *Mr. 0. W. Broadwell; Mr. L. Z. Tanney*and *Mr. B. J. Sawyer,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Walter C. Ong,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Certification of CFO
Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Comprehensive Care Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2011 (the Report), Robert J. Landis, as Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/    ROBERT J. LANDISRobert J. LandisActing Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting OfficerMay 16, 2011




38
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tasco International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Adrienne Humphries, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
1st day of February 2004.


/s/ Adrienne Humphries
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1(b)**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Michael H. Schoeffler, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Starcraft Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC ReleaseNos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; 

 

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

 

d) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls. 

 

Signed this 16th day of December, 2004
# L_2005097EN.01001901.xml

| 15.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 97/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 97/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 573/2005

of 14 April 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 23rd partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 23rd partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 39,991 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 April 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

2

---
#### George Warren THOMAS, Jr., Petitioner, v. JACKSONVILLE SHIPYARDS, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 44823.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 8, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
Exhibit 2.2

AGREEMENT TO FURNISH INSTRUMENTS RELATING TO LONG-TERM DEBT



| |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                        
| |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | Jeffrey D. McGhie
Group General Counsel VimpelCom
Ltd. The Rock Bld. Claude Debussylaan
88 1082 MD Amsterdam The
Netherlands Tel: + 31 20 797 7200
Fax: +31 20 797 7201

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

United States of America

April 30, 2012

Re: VimpelCom Ltd. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 File No. 001-468091

Dear Sirs:

Neither VimpelCom Ltd. (the
Company) nor any of its consolidated subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument with respect to its long-term debt under which the total amount of securities authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries
on a consolidated basis as of April 30, 2012. In accordance with paragraph 2(b)(i) of the Instructions as to Exhibits on Form 20-F, the Company hereby agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of any
instrument that defines the rights of holders of long-term debt issued by the Company or any of its consolidated subsidiaries.

Very truly
yours,



|                     
|---------------------
|VimpelCom Ltd.       
|                     
|/s/ Jeffrey D. McGhie
|Jeffrey D. McGhie    
|Group General Counsel
# October 2008 - June 2010
Programs

– Unemployment Mortgage Assistance provides 

temporary mortgage assistance to eligible 

homeowners who have suffered involuntary 

unemployment.

– Mortgage Reinstatement Assistance Program

helps eligible homeowners reinstate their first 

mortgage loan if they have fallen behind due 

to short-term financial problems.

– Principal Reduction Program helps eligible 

homeowners who have suffered a financial 

hardship obtain sustainable mortgage payments by reducing principal loan balances.

– Transition Assistance Program provides onetime funds to help eligible homeowners 

transition to new housing after executing 

a short sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.

Background

Keep Your Home California is a $2 billion 

program established under the U.S. Treasury’s 

Hardest Hit Fund to offer mortgage assistance 

to low and moderate income homeowners who 

are delinquent or facing imminent default on 

their mortgage. There are four unique programs 

that make up Keep Your Home California, 

all of which have been developed to address 

different aspects of the foreclosure crisis and 

help homeowners facing financial hardships.

Requirements

Homeowner:

– Own and occupy the home as the 

primary residence.

– Meet program income limits

– Have a documented, eligible hardship

Property:

– Located in California

– Not abandoned, vacant, or condemned

– Single family, 1-4 unit home

Mortgage:

– Serviced by a participating Servicer

– First mortgage lien

(HELOCs are not eligible)

– Deliquient or imminent default

KYHC25

12/13 Fraud Alert: Homeowners will never be asked to pay a fee for any Keep Your Home California program. If you are asked to pay a fee or 

suspect fraud or misrepresentation related to a Keep Your Home California program or representative, you are encouraged to contact 

our Compliance unit at 916-326-8686 or by email at complianceunit@kyhca.org KYHC25 12/13

visit www.KeepYourHomeCalifornia.org

5 3 3 7
EXHIBIT 15.2

Letter of Grant Thornton, dated July 9, 2010 with respect to item 16F



---

July 9, 2010

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Office
of the Chief Accountant

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



|Re: | China Metro-Rural Holdings Limited
|--- | ----------------------------------

Dear Sir or
Madam:

We have read Item 16F of Form 20-F of China Metro-Rural Holdings Limited for the year ended March 31, 2010, and agree with
the statements concerning our Firm contained therein.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Grant Thornton

Hong Kong
# L_2005240EN.01004201.xml

| 16.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 240/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 240/42

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1500/2005

of 15 September 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 9 to 15 September 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29406]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 21, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Paul H. and Neva M. Johnson, Algona, Iowa; to acquire voting 
shares of Mid-Iowa Bancshares Company, Algona, Iowa, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Iowa State Bank, Algona, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 3, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-29406 Filed 11-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F