alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3647 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3647

   To amend the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored 
  Terrorism Act to use funds in the lump sum catch-up payment reserve 
       fund to make payments to Iran hostages and their families.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2024

Mr. Warnock (for himself and Mr. Vance) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored 
  Terrorism Act to use funds in the lump sum catch-up payment reserve 
       fund to make payments to Iran hostages and their families.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Former American Hostages 
in Iran Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. JUSTICE FOR UNITED STATES VICTIMS OF STATE SPONSORED TERRORISM.

    Subsection (d)(4)(D)(iv)(IV) of the Justice for United States 
Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act (34 U.S.C. 
20144(d)(4)(D)(iv)(IV)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating item (bb) as item (dd);
            (2) by inserting after item (aa) the following:
                                            ``(bb) Iran hostages.--
                                        There are authorized to be 
                                        appropriated and there are 
                                        appropriated to the Fund such 
                                        sums as are necessary to make 
                                        full and complete payments for 
                                        amounts outstanding and unpaid 
                                        on claims under subparagraphs 
                                        (B) and (C) of subsection 
                                        (c)(2), which shall be paid by 
                                        the Fund on the claims not 
                                        later than 30 days after the 
                                        date of enactment of this item.
                                            ``(cc) Limitation.--Amounts 
                                        appropriated pursuant to item 
                                        (bb) may not be used for a 
                                        purpose other than to make 
                                        payments under this clause.'';
            (3) in item (cc), as so redesignated, by inserting ``item 
        (bb) or'' before ``subclauses''; and
            (4) in item (aa), by striking ``disperses'' and inserting 
        ``disburses''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of USA Real Estate Holding Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Miller, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ James MillerName:James MillerTitle:TreasurerDate:March 30, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Varian Semiconductor Associates, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended July 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                          
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated: August 5, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    GARY E.
DICKERSON                 
|                      |  |  |  | Gary E. Dickerson Chief Executive Officer
# stad o Libr e Asociad o de Puert o Ri c

Municipi o de Mayaglie z Oficin ade l Alcald e

Februar y 16,201 1 

# rx^rTsT"^rc^T^nqcr3 X
Mr . Michae l F . Marti n !

- , '^ r •; - Unite dState s Department

o f Transportatio n ^. " ori j Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s _ : -;"3^^s : RE : EA S ai r

carrie r proposal s a t

Mayagiiez , P.R . :;d^( 3 Dea r Mr . Martin : ^ '-' ^ Thi s i s i n regar dto your e-mai l date d Januar

y 24 , 2011 , requestin g th e Municipalit y o f Mayagiie z to comment

regardin g th e selectio n proces s o f a n air carrier tha t ma y serv e ou

r community . We hav e reviewe dth e proposal s submitte d b y Air Sunshine , Cap e Air , an d Seaborn e Airhnes . Our

recommendatio n i s base d o n ou r experienc e fo

r th e pas t tw o years . I

n hght o f this , w e mus t infor myo u tha

t th e servic e provide d b y Cap e Ai r ha s been efficien

t an d acceptabl e to ou r community . Therefore , th e Cit

y o f Mayagiie z strongl y recommend s to DO T to re-selec t Cap e Ai r to continu e providin g Essential Air Servic e a

t Mayagiiez . Th e followin g reason s are important fo r ou r recommendation :

• Stron g histor

y o f performanc e i

n Mayagiie z • Only proposal whic h ha s amajor airlin e code , Continental Airline s • Only proposal whic h offer s interlin e abilitie s • Lowes t

fare s • Four dail y roun dtrip s • Robus t

marketin g pla

n T o provid e stabilit

y i n Mayagiiez , w e als o reques t DO T selec t

Cap e Air fo r a n extende d five yea r term . Sincerely , Jos e Guillerm o Rodrigue z Mayo r 

### Apartad o 447 , Mayaguez , Puert o Ric o 0068 1 * Te l (787 )

834-858 5 Fa x (787 ) 265-227 0 alcaldia@mayaguezpr.go v
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 370 

To amend section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to ensure 

that efforts to engage in espionage or technology transfer are considered 

in visa issuance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SCHMITT, Mr. BRAUN, 

Mrs. BLACKBURN, and Mr. TUBERVILLE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act to ensure that efforts to engage in espionage or 

technology transfer are considered in visa issuance, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting America 

5 From Spies Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 370 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPANDING INADMISSIBILITY ON SECURITY AND 

2 RELATED GROUNDS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 212(a)(3)(A) of the Im4 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(A)) 

5 is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any alien is inadmis7 sible if a consular officer or the Secretary of 

8 Homeland Security knows, or has reasonable 

9 ground to believe, that the alien— 

10 ‘‘(i) engages, has engaged, or will en11 gage in any activity— 

12 ‘‘(I) in violation of any law of the 

13 United States relating to espionage or 

14 sabotage; or 

15 ‘‘(II) that would violate any law 

16 of the United States relating to espio17 nage or sabotage if the activity oc18 curred in the United States; 

19 ‘‘(ii) engages, has engaged, or will en20 gage in any activity in violation or evasion 

21 of any law prohibiting the export from the 

22 United States of goods, technology, or sen23 sitive information; 

24 ‘‘(iii) seeks to enter the United States 

25 to engage solely, principally, or incidentally 

26 in any other unlawful activity; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 370 IS

1 ‘‘(iv) seeks to enter the United States 

2 to engage solely, principally, or incidentally 

3 in any activity a purpose of which is the 

4 opposition to, or the control or overthrow 

5 of, the Government of the United States by 

6 force, violence, or other unlawful means; or 

7 ‘‘(v) is the spouse or child of an alien 

8 who is inadmissible under this subpara9 graph, if the activity causing the alien to 

10 be found inadmissible occurred within the 

11 last 5 years.’’. 

12 (b) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—Section 212(d)(3)(A) of 

13 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

14 1182(d)(3)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘(other than para15 graphs (3)(A)(i)(I), (3)(A)(ii), (3)(A)(iii), (3)(C), and 

16 clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (3)(E) of such sub17 section)’’ each place such phrase appears and inserting 

18 ‘‘(other than subparagraphs (A)(i)(I), (A)(ii), (A)(iii), 

19 (A)(iv), (C), (E)(i), and (E)(ii) of paragraph (3) of such 

20 subsection)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
October 24, 2008 

Mr. David G. Nason 

Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions 

U.S. Department of Treasury 

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20220 

Dear Mr. Nason: 

 At your request, the staff of the Commission’s Office of the Chief Accountant and 

the staff of the Financial Accounting Standards Board have reviewed the October 24, 

2008 final version of the public company document entitled “Securities Purchase 

Agreement,” and the accompanying document entitled “Form of Warrant To Purchase 

Common Stock,” copies of which are also attached. 

At your further request, the Commission staff and FASB staff have analyzed the 

terms and conditions of the Warrants described within these documents and we would not 

object if the Warrants, as defined in the documents provided, were to be classified as 

permanent equity under applicable U.S. GAAP, provided that the issuer of such Warrants 

has sufficient authorized but unissued shares of the class of stock that may be required 

upon settlement and any other necessary shareholder approvals have been obtained. 

If an issuer does not have required shareholder approval, including shareholder 

approval for sufficient authorized but unissued shares of the class of stock that may be 

required for settlement, we would also not object to classification of such Warrants as 

permanent equity provided that the issuer takes the necessary action to secure sufficient 

approvals prior to the end of the fiscal quarter in which such Warrants are issued. 

Our conclusions solely apply to the Warrants described above and are based 

solely on our review of the documents provided by your office and analysis of applicable 

U.S. GAAP that has been issued as of the date of this letter. 

Sincerely, Sincerely, 

 James Kroeker Russell Golden 

Deputy Chief Accountant Technical Director 

Securities and Exchange Financial Accounting 

Commission Standards Board 

Attachments
In the 

Indiana Supreme Court 

Floyd TEWELL, 

 Appellant, 

 v. 

STATE of Indiana, 

Appellee. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Supreme Court Cause No. 

48S02-0801-PC-21 

Court of Appeals Cause No. 

48A02-0701-PC-118 

Madison Superior Court Cause No. 

48D03-0610-MI-901 

PUBLISHED ORDER GRANTING TRANSFER and 

ADOPTING THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

 The Parole Board revoked parole for Appellant, Floyd Tewell, thus returning him to 

prison to serve out a life sentence. Tewell then filed what he titled a petition for writ of habeas 

corpus. Treating the petition as one seeking post-conviction relief, the trial court denied relief 

and Tewell appealed. Rejecting Tewell’s appellate arguments, the Court of Appeals held the 

trial court (1) had correctly treated Tewell’s petition as a post-conviction relief petition, and (2) 

had properly concluded the Indiana Parole Board had not previously discharged Tewell from his 

life sentence. See Tewell v. State, 876 N.E.2d 337 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). 

 The matter comes before this Court on Tewell’s pro se petition seeking transfer of 

jurisdiction in accordance with Appellate Rules 56(B) and 57(B)(2). The Justices have 

reviewed the decision of the Court of Appeals and materials filed in connection with the request 

to transfer jurisdiction, and have discussed the matter in conference. 

 Being duly advised and having concluded the Court of Appeals correctly decided the 

issues, we GRANT transfer, and ADOPT the opinion of the Court of Appeals. See Ind. 

Appellate Rule 58(A)(1). 

 The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to West Publishing for publication in 

the bound volumes of this Court’s decisions. 

 Done at Indianapolis, Indiana, this 11th day of January, 2008. 

 

 /s/ Randall T. Shepard 

 Chief Justice of Indiana 

All Justices concur.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MOISES ESPINOZA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3731

[January 2, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 562007CF005069A.

Moises Espinoza, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 15.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms****F-3 (No. 333-196223 and No. 333-213905), and S-8 (Nos.333-166315, 333-180368 and 333-183294) of VEON Ltd. (formerly VimpelCom Ltd.) of our report dated April 3, 2017 relating to the financial statements****and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in thisAnnual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 of VEON Ltd. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Selected Financial Data” in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. 

Amsterdam, April 3, 2017 

PricewaterhouseCoopers AccountantsN.V. 

/s/ F.P. Izeboud RA, CPA 

F.P. Izeboud RA, CPA 

 
2
254 La. 830

#### STATE of Louisiana v. John K. SNYDER.

No. 50172.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 6, 1969.

In re: John K. Snyder applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
~ ~ 

~ o, 

'T1 T ~ 

~ ~ 2Ln ~ ~ ~' ~• ~ ~ T~ 

, 

~ Q 

~Ep 6i m 

~ 

m 9D 0 ~ 9 ~ O> ID Q Ci 

Q 

N N 

G~~J1 

N i~t 

~~ 

N tJ 

~~ 

N N 

~~ 

N t~3 

~ y 

-~ :~y' 

V~"' 

-• -• 

~~ 

•.a ~ 

G ~ W 

~a ,,,~~ 

F] ~ 

.r ~ 

r ~ 

g b 

~ 

CD 

0 

w° 

Q 

 1 

Q 

m 

0 

tn 

° 

+ L~i r 

40 

m ~ ~ 

Z C7 

~

E 

~

p~ 

e0 

o ca 

1V m 

A N~ 

N m 

o>c~ 

W~ 

N-~ 

C~ 

vo 

i+. 41b, 

tJ 

vc.► 

!~7 ~.1 

~ a 

fJ Q! 

c7+ n O 

N V 

tJ 

A~ 

AJ v 

CII ~ 

C 

~ p 

~

gtbT 

~ 

~ 

m 

v 

v 

~ 

~ rn 

Ai VI 

b 

p ~ 

N a? 

~~ A C1D 

.N{~ ~7 {+ Gom O~ VOD 

nf Oo 

Q m 

N Qo 

t~i W ~ m 

rV -d 

m O 

m 

n ~ 

m 

v 

a m ~ o 

~ 

m v ~ 

cn 

o ~ `~~" 

~ 

G 

_ 

~~ ► 

L~aZ~ 

v = 4 'n ~ ff 3 a 

T 

b 

~ ~ ~ ~ ...► m J► ~ i~ C! IV 

~ V _ ~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

a m 0 

m Cl) 

~Oo 

n 

~ 

~ 

~ 

A 

Vt
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2920]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
National Institute of Corrections


Advisory Board Meeting

    Time and Date: 8:00 a.m., Tuesday, February 25, 1997.
    Place: Phoenix Park Hotel, 520 North Capitol Street, NW., 
Washington, DC.
    Status: Open.
    Matters To Be Considered: Updates on the Violent Offender and Truth 
in Sentencing Grant Program, the District of Columbia Department of 
Corrections Studies, the NIC Executive Excellence Program, The NIC 
budget, NIC's all-staff meeting, and the survey on super-maximum 
prisons. A report on NIC's strategic planning will be given, and new 
officers for the Board will be elected.
    For More Information Contact: Larry Solomon, Deputy Director, (202) 
307-3106, ext. 155.
George Keiser,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 97-2920 Filed 2-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-36-M
Fourth Amend. of the Sky Financial Group, Employee Stock Ownership Pension Plan



Exhibit 10.18 
 
FOURTH AMENDMENT 
OF THE 
SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP
PENSION PLAN 
(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2001)

 
WHEREAS,
Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Sky Financial Group, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Pension Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 
WHEREAS, the Company has delegated authority to amend the Plan to the Sky Financial Group, Inc.
Benefit Plans Committee (the “Committee”), and the Committee has determined that amendment of the Plan is necessary and desirable. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power reserved to the Company by Section 9.01 of the
Plan, and by virtue of the authority delegated to the Committee, the Plan, as previously amended, is hereby further amended, in the following particulars: 
 
1. By substituting the following sentence for the sentence immediately following subparagraph (e) of Section 1.03 of the Plan, effective
as of December 1, 2002: 
 
“Notwithstanding
the foregoing, until January 1, 2003, the ‘Annual Compensation’ of any Participant employed by Celaris Group, Inc. or Value Added Benefits, Ltd. (including any such Participant employed by Sky Insurance who was previously employed by
Celaris Group, Inc. or Valued Added Benefits, Ltd.) as a ‘Producer With Management Responsibilities,’ will not include any commissions received by such Participant for services performed as a Producer With Management
Responsibilities.” 
 
2. By substituting the
following sentence for the second sentence of Section 2.01 of the Plan, effective as of January 1, 2003: 
 
“Each Employee of Celaris Group, Inc. or Value Added Benefits, Ltd. (including each Employee of Celaris Group, Inc. or Value Added
Benefits, Ltd. who becomes or has become an Employee of Sky Insurance) shall participate in the Plan on or after April 1, 2002 and before January 1, 2003, solely in accordance with Section 2.04 of the Plan.” 







 
3. By
substituting the following for paragraph (d) of Section 2.01 of the Plan, effective as of January 1, 2003: 
 
“(d) the Employee is not subject to an employment agreement that provides that the Employee is not entitled to
contributions under an employer-sponsored pension or employee stock ownership plan.” 
 
4. By adding the phrase “and continuing until December 31, 2002” immediately after the date “April 1, 2002” in the first sentence of Section 2.04 of the Plan, effective as of
December 1, 2002. 
 
*        *        * 
 
I, Thomas A. Sciorilli, on behalf of the Sky Financial Group, Inc. Benefit Plans Committee, hereby certify that the foregoing is a
correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Committee on November 13, 2002 and that the resolution has not been changed or repealed. 
 

	 SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
 BENEFIT PLANS COMMITTEE

	
	 By:
	 	

	 	 	 A Member of the Committee



 

-2-
Planning/Study

$206K

FLAP Obligations/Expenditures by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$0 $0 $0 $0 $4,131 $2,840 $6,971

FLAP Loan/Credits by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$0 $0 $0 $0 ($11,123) $100,000 $88,877

Programming Decisions Committee Members

Name Phone   E-mail Title

Reed Macmillan 302-387-6027 reed.macmillan@doverkentmpo.org Executive director; Dover/Kent MPO

Ann Gravatt 302-760-2254 ann.gravatt@state.de.us DelDOT Planning Director

Jacinda Russell 571-434-1543 Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov Access Program Manager

Call for Projects information

Start Date End Date

No. applications

received

Total Access funds

requested

12/9/2013 2/10/2014 1 $15,000

1/19/2015 4/17/2015 0 $0

7/15/2016 10/14/2016 1 $200,000

Local Match

20.00%

Congressional District

At-large $206K

Total project's costs by FLMA Accessed

NPS 100%

Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP)

Delaware

Projects Programmed

1

FLAP Funds Programmed

$0.2M

Federal Lands Highway Division

EFLHD

FLAP Allocations by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$29,677 $29,900 $29,300 $23,657 $23,652 $23,287 $159,473

$215K
*This information is an overview of the FLAP projects information. It is subject to change at any time. For additional details or clarifications, please contact the Federal Lands Highway Division offices or visit the State FLAP

webpage.

Project ID Project Name- Description Improvement type Delivery Agency Delivery 

Year

DE FLAP DOT TRL(1)

Perform safety study on multiuse trail system 

roadway crossings and implement study 

recommendations.

Planning/Study Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division, FHWA 2018
© 2018 HERE, © 2019 Microsoft Corporation

Project ID

DE FLAP DOT TRL(1)
# C_2005088EN.01000701.xml

| 12.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3744 — Alcoa/AFL)

(2005/C 88/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 23 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3744. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3744. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---