alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Ryan K. "Coconut" Koffman <rcoconut@yahoo.com>

Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 3:06 AM

To: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Cc: Ryan Koffman
Subject: Re: Petition for Exemption Docket No. FAA-2014-0958-0001, Ryan K. Koffman

Attachments: Motion Picture & Television Operations Manual.docx

Ms. Nia Daniels,

Thank you for contacting me regarding cl arification with my exemption request.

I did intend to use the sUAS for closed-set filming and I was informed by an email from Brad Howard, All Weather Program M anager/UAS Specialist AWP-220, NextGen Branch, dated December 16, 2014 "The FAA does not regulate that airspace inside buildings or structures."

The above statement lead me to believe it was acceptable to utilize sUAS indoors for commercial purposes since the sUAS would no t operate near/in the NAS.

I do apologize for this misunderstanding on my behalf and you will see I have attached a Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual along with this email in which I hope is acceptable.

I'm sure you may understand this is proprietary in formation and would greatly appreciate if this information not be made public.

I am looking forward to hearing from you in the future.

Thank you for your time and a ssistance regarding my petition.

Sincerely,

Ryan K. Koffman

Ryan K. Koffman 12289 Daisy Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739-1921

805-895-6425 rcoconut@yahoo.com

From: " Nia.Daniels@faa.gov " < Nia.Daniels@faa.gov > To: rcoconut@yahoo.com

Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 1:38 PM Subject: Petition for Exemption

Mr. Koffman,2 I am contacting you to get clarification on your exemption request. Did you intend to use your sUAS for closed-set filming? If so, please provide a mo tion pictures and television operations manual.

If not, we can proceed forward with your exemption request.

Thank you,

Nia Daniels, ARM-108

Federal Aviation Administration Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 PH: (202) 267 - 7626 Fax: (202) 267 - 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2014

No. 04-14-00575-CV

ESTATE OF DELFINA E. ALEXANDER, Deceased,

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-PB7-000016-L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion to Abate Appeal Pending Determination of Jurisdiction is 

MOOT.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 77D - DWS Strategic Income Fund (the
"Fund")

At a meeting held September 18, 2008, the Board of
Trustees of DWS Strategic Income Fund approved
the following changes regarding the Fund:

Expanding the existing iGAP overly strategy to
include the integrated Global Alpha Platform
("iGAP") equity overlay strategy and the
amendment of the Fund's investment policies as
necessary for the Fund to invest equities as part of
the iGAP overlay strategy.

C:\Documents and Settings\e467565\Local Settings\Temporary Internet
Files\OLK47B\Exhibit 77D.doc
#### Linda Stansell MORRISON et al. v. CLEARVIEW MEDICAL PLAZA et al.

No. 62301.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: Clearview Medical Plaza, William J. Hogan, L. Dow Oliver and Ralph D. Dwyer, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Jefferson. 357 So.2d 1386.

Writ denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40638

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROY MOLINA, also known as José Roel Molina,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-96-CR-46-2

--------------------

December 14, 2000

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

 Counsel for Roy Molina, the Federal Public Defender, has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Molina has filed a

response. Our independent review of the brief, the response, and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See id.

Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
BLIIIJE 

CHROMA ·,vn~ S 10• P~li:SO,..:.L f.10u" i.J A ON,. ~A~ OM -n;:;• 

MANUAL 

J 

.... c.au. -
# Transactions Report - CPP

Page &P of &N

# CPP Footnotes

Page &P of &N

# CPP - Citi

Page &P of &N

# CDCI

Page &P of &N

# AIFP.ASSP

Page &P of &N

# TIP.AGP

Page &P of &N

# AIG

Page &P of &N

# CBLI

Page &P of &N

# SBA

Page &P of &N

# PPIP

Page &P of &N
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I,
        Stuart
        D. Beath, Chief Financial Officer of International Fuel Technology, Inc.
        (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
        2007
        as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:
        August 14, 2007
  By:
              */s/
                Stuart D. Beath*Stuart
                  D. Beath
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
Loan Originations, January 2009

($ Millions)

Name First Mortgage HELOC (Lines and Increases) 

US Card 

(Managed): 

Initial Line 

Amount 

Other 

Consumer 

Lending 

C & I: 

Renewal of 

Existing 

Accounts 

C & I: New 

Commitments 

CRE: Renew

of Existin

Accounts 

American Express $0 $0 $889 $2 $0 $0 Bank of America $22,887 $1,402 $2,058 $3,425 $11,255 $15,688 $2,BB&T $1,814 $72 $155 $312 $903 $1,092 $1,Bank of New York Mellon $97 $11 $0 $4 $366 $139 Capital One $3 $12 $1,027 $655 $173 $446 CIT N/A N/A N/A $1 $2,614 $814 NCitigroup $7,838 $769 $6,165 $2,628 $455 $836 Comerica $33 $8 $13 $17 $786 $170 $Fifth Third $1,459 $129 $233 $388 $1,701 $785 $Goldman Sachs $87 $0 $0 $41 $800 $5,331 $JPMorgan Chase $9,572 $312 $3,384 $3,198 $14,959 $14,398 $KeyCorp $129 $121 $0 $192 $835 $537 $Marshall & Ilsley $263 $42 $5 $77 $337 $72 Morgan Stanley $11 $0 $0 $215 $396 $2,929 Northern Trust $39 $88 N/A $102 $627 $371 PNC $2,323 $335 $156 $575 $2,692 $1,486 $Regions $722 $109 $0 $290 $1,275 $854 $1,State Street N/A N/A N/A N/A $139 $150 SunTrust $3,476 $119 $11 $599 $1,134 $725 $U.S. Bancorp $4,041 $348 $691 $1,383 $4,177 $2,044 $Wells Fargo $24,010 $597 $1,504 $3,903 $11,475 $5,379 $2,

Loan Category Key 

First Mortgages Loans secured by first liens on residential real estate HELOC Home equity lines of credit US Card (Managed) US credit cards (managed) C & I Commercial and industrial CRE Commercial real estate N/A Denotes recipient is not active in this category NOTE: Reliance on internal reporting means that aggregation by loan category varies for each reporting bank. Because of the differences in loan category definitions, comparisons of origination levels across firms may be imperfect.
#### James J. REISA, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. COLT AND DUMONT MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al., Respondents, Cross-Petitioners.

No. 44455.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 9, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1468

DERRICK SALLIS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Spartanburg

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 7:19

- cv
- 00320

- TMC )

Submitted : September 24, 2020 Decided: October 20, 2020

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Derrick Sallis , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Derrick Sallis seeks to appeal the dist rict court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing Sallis’ civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry o f the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filin g of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court entered its final order on March 2, 2020. Sallis filed the notice of appeal on April 6, 2020

. Because Sallis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny his motion for a stay and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the m aterials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISS ED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 5, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41708

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN HERNANDEZ-GAMBOA, also known as Rogelio Cardenas-Garcia,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CR-1305-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan HernandezGamboa raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Salvadore BIONDOLILLO, Sr. v. GEOSOURCE, INC., et al.

No. 62679.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Geosource, Inc., (Hunt Shipyard) and Commercial Union Insurance Co., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 359 So.2d 286.

Writ denied.

MARCUS, J., would grant a writ.
FIFTH ROUND FUNDING ALLOCATIONS BY STATE1

[1] Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Nevada, and South Carolina, did not apply for the Phase 2 Fifth Round Funding. Georgia applied 

for Phase 2, but will not receive additional funding beyond Phase 1, based on its performance to date and other factors. Alabama 

did not meet the 50 percent utilization requirement for Phase 1 and therefore was ineligible for additional funds.

State Phase 1 Allocation Phase 2 Allocation Total Fifth Round 

Funding Allocation

Total HHF 

Funding 

(Rounds 1-5)

AL Ineligible Did Not Apply $0 $162,521,345

AZ $28,282,519 Did Not Apply $28,282,519 $296,048,525

CA $213,489,977 $169,769,247 $383,259,224 $2,358,593,320

DC $4,924,602 $3,123,331 $8,047,933 $28,745,131

FL $77,896,538 Did Not Apply $77,896,538 $1,135,735,674

GA $30,880,575 $0 $30,880,575 $370,136,394

IL $118,174,500 $151,299,560 $269,474,060 $715,077,617

IN $28,565,323 $33,454,975 $62,020,298 $283,714,437

KY $30,148,245 $27,955,713 $58,103,958 $207,005,833

MI $74,491,816 $188,106,491 $262,598,307 $761,204,045

MS $19,340,040 $23,063,338 $42,403,378 $144,291,701

NC $78,016,445 $145,709,333 $223,725,778 $706,507,564

NJ $69,231,301 $45,354,517 $114,585,818 $415,133,962

NV $8,885,641 Did Not Apply $8,885,641 $202,911,881

OH $97,590,720 $94,316,248 $191,906,968 $762,302,067

OR $36,425,456 $58,110,108 $94,535,564 $314,578,350

RI $9,680,817 $26,942,913 $36,623,730 $115,975,303

SC $22,030,274 Did Not Apply $22,030,274 $317,461,821

TN $51,945,211 $32,794,226 $84,739,437 $302,055,030

TOTAL $1,000,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $9,600,000,000
Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.
                                   One Beacon Street
                                   Boston, MA 02108

                                   August 27, 2008



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC  20549


RE:  Tax-Exempt  California Money Market Fund (the "Fund" and the "Trust") (Reg.
     Nos. 33-12938, 811-05076)


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Trust
hereby certifies that the form of Prospectus and Statement of Additional
Information that would have been filed on behalf of the Fund's Institutional
Shares pursuant to Rule 497(c) upon the effectiveness of Post-Effective
Amendment No. 27 to the Trust's Registration Statement on Form N-1A (the
"Amendment"), do not differ from that contained in the Amendment, which is the
most recent amendment to such Registration Statement and was filed
electronically on August 26, 2008.

Any comments or questions on this filing should be directed to the undersigned
at (617) 295-3986.

                                   Very truly yours,


                                   /s/Scott D. Hogan
                                   Scott D. Hogan
                                   Vice President
                                   Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.

cc:      Jose Del Real, Esq., Vedder Price, P.C.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric E. Parsons, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 5, 2008



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    ERIC E. PARSONS                                         
|Eric E. Parsons Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60743-60744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29755]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to 
request approval on a new, and/or currently approved information 
collection.

DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before January 12, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, 
Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, S.W., Suite 5000, 
Washington, D.C. 20416. Phone Number: 202-205-6629.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: ``Small Disadvantaged Business Certification Application''.
    Type of Request: New Collection.
    Form No: N/A.
    Description of Respondents: Small Businesses seeking certification 
as a Small Disadvantaged Business.
    Annual Responses: 100,000.
    Annual Burden: 5,000.
    Comments: Send all comments regarding this information collection 
to Patricia A. Lefevre, Office of Minority Enterprise Development, 
Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, S.W., Suite 8000, 
Washington, D.C. 20416. Phone No: 202-205-6416. Send

[[Page 60744]]

comments regarding whether this information collection is necessary for 
the proper performance of the function of the agency, accuracy of 
burden estimate, in addition to ways to minimize this estimate, and 
ways to enhance the quality.

    Dated: October 31, 1997.
Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-29755 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Floyd F. Chadee, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 5, 2009



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    FLOYD F. CHADEE                           
|Floyd F. Chadee                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 35.1
 
 SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
 
 I, Steven C. McNeal, Vice President and Treasurer of Entergy Texas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), certify that:
 
 (a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of November 6, 2009 between Entergy Texas Restoration Funding, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.
 
 (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
 
 Date: March 27, 2020
 By  /s/ Steven C. McNeal
 
 Name:  Steven C. McNeal
 Title:  Vice President and Treasurer
Opinion issued May 1, 2014 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO S . 01 - 12 - 00650 - CR 01 - 12 - 00651 - CR

——————————— GEOVANNY FRANCISCO L AGUAN , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No s . 11 - CCR - 158234 & 11 - CCR - 158058

MEMORANDUM OPINION A ppellant, Geovanny Francisco Laguan , was convicted of operating a motor vehicle without a driver’s license and cutting across a driveway at an intersection to turn from one highway to another. See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 12.41(3)2

( Vernon 2011) & T EX . T RANSP . C ODE A NN . § 521.025 ( Vernon 2013 ). Appellant did not request or pay for a reporter’s record for over a year after these appeals were filed

. The record contains no suggestion that appellant is indigent, no r has appellant made any request that a record be provided at no cost to him. Afte r appellant was given notice and an opportunity to cure, which he failed to do, this Court ordered that the appeal s be submitted for decision without a reporter’s record. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(c)(1). Appellant’s briefs were due August 19, 2013. However, a ppellant did not file brief s , and this Court ordered that the case s be submitted without briefs if none w ere filed by October 17, 2013. Four months have passed and no briefs have been filed. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 38.8(b)(4). Absent briefs, no is sues are presented for our review. Nevertheless, in the interest of justice, we have reviewed the record for unassigned fundamental error. See Lott v. State , 874 S.W. 2d 687, 688 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994) (reviewing appeal for unassigned fundamental error w hen appellant failed to file brief on appeal)

. Finding no unassigned fundamental error, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Sherry Radack Chief Justice Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle. Do not p ublish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2( b).
#### BELL’S FISH AND POULTRY CO., Inc. v. JENKINS.

No. 39184.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 512.