# Patent

## Title
Multi-piece solid golf ball

## Abstract

The invention provides a multi-piece solid golf ball comprising a core, an envelope layer encasing the core, an intermediate layer encasing the envelope layer, and a cover which encases the intermediate layer and has formed on a surface thereof a plurality of dimples. The core is formed primarily of a rubber material, has a diameter of at least 31 mm, and has a hardness which gradually increases from a center to a surface thereof, the hardness difference in JIS-C hardness units between the core center and the core surface being at least 15 and, letting (I) be the average value for cross-sectional hardnesses at a position 15 mm from the core center and at the core center and letting (II) be the cross-sectional hardness at a position 7.5 mm from the core center, the hardness difference (I)-(II) therebetween in JIS-C units being not more than ±2.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/952,602 filed Dec. 7, 2007, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/645,555 filed on Dec. 27, 2006, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/443,130 filed on May 31, 2006, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a multi-piece solid golf ball composed of a core, an envelope layer, an intermediate layer and a cover that have been formed as successive layers. More specifically, the invention relates to a multi-piece solid golf ball for professionals and other skilled golfers which is endowed with an excellent flight performance and good controllability.
A variety of golf balls have hitherto been developed for professionals and other skilled golfers. Of these, multi-piece solid golf balls in which the hardness relationship between an intermediate layer encasing the core and the cover layer has been optimized are in wide use because they achieve both a superior distance in the high head speed range and controllability on shots taken with an iron and on approach shots. Another important concern is the proper selection of thicknesses and hardnesses for the respective layers of the golf ball in order to optimize not only flight performance, but also the feel of the ball when played as well as its spin rate after being struck with a club, particularly given the large influence of the spin rate on control of the ball. A further key concern in ball development, arising from the desire that golf balls also have durability under repeated impact and suppress burr formation on the surface of the ball (have improved scuff resistance) when repeatedly played with different types of clubs, is how best to protect the ball from external factors.
The three-piece solid golf balls having an outer layer cover formed primarily of a thermoplastic polyurethane that are disclosed in, for example, JP-A 2003-190330, JP-A 2004-049913, JP-A 2004-97802 and JP-A 2005-319287 were intended to meet such a need. However, because these golf balls fail to achieve a sufficiently lower spin rate when hit with a driver, professionals and other skilled golfers desire a ball which delivers an even longer distance.
Meanwhile, efforts to improve the flight and other performance characteristics of golf balls have led to the development of balls having a four-layer construction, i.e., a core enclosed by three intermediate or cover layers, that allows the ball construction to be varied among the several layers at the interior. Such golf balls have been disclosed in, for example, JP-A 9-248351, JP-A 10-127818, JP-A 10-127819, JP-A 10-295852, JP-A 10-328325, JP-A 10-328326, JP-A 10-328327, JP-A 10-328328, JP-A 11-4916 and JP-A 2004-180822.
Yet, as golf balls for the skilled golfer, such balls provide a poor balance of distance and controllability or fall short in terms of achieving a lower spin rate on shots with a driver, thus limiting the degree to which the total distance can be increased.
Moreover, in the multi-piece solid golf ball disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,994,638, the relationship between the thicknesses and hardnesses of the respective layers such as the intermediate layer and the cover is not disclosed. Hence, this ball is inadequate for achieving the spin rate-lowering effect on shots with a driver that is desired in a golf ball for the skilled golfer.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a multi-piece solid golf ball which has a flight performance and controllability that are fully acceptable to professionals and other skilled golfers, while also having an excellent durability to cracking on repeated impact and an excellent scuff resistance.
The present invention provides, as the basic construction in golf ball design, a multilayer structure of three or more outer layers (envelope layer/intermediate layer/cover) enclosing the core. Moreover, with regard to the hardness profile of the core, by focusing in particular on both the gradient and the hardness difference between the surface and the center of the core and optimizing these, the invention achieves, through synergistic effects between, e.g., the relative surface hardnesses at various sites in this construction and the thicknesses of the respective covering layers, characteristics that are fully acceptable to the skilled golfer. Depending on the makeup of the intermediate layer, a high rebound, a good durability and a lower spin rate on full shots can all be achieved. By forming the envelope layer of a material which has a high resilience and is softer than the intermediate layer, the ball is provided with a lower spin rate on shots with a driver (W#1) and a high durability to repeated impact. In addition, by imparting to the surfaces of the respective layers in the envelope layer/intermediate layer/cover construction a hardness relationship, expressed in the order of the successive layer surfaces, of soft/hard/soft, and by optimizing the relationship between the intermediate layer and the cover layer thickness, it was possible through the synergistic effects of these hardness and layer thickness relationships to resolve the above-described problems encountered in the prior art. That is, the golf ball of the invention, when used by professionals and other skilled golfers, provides a fully acceptable flight performance and controllability, in addition to which it exhibits an excellent durability to cracking on repeated impact and an excellent scuff resistance, effects which were entirely unanticipated. The inventors, having thus found that the technical challenges recited above can be overcome by the foregoing arrangement, ultimately arrived at the present invention.
Accordingly, the invention provides the following multi-piece solid golf balls.
[1] A multi-piece solid golf ball comprising a core, an envelope layer encasing the core, an intermediate layer encasing the envelope layer, and a cover which encases the intermediate layer and has formed on a surface thereof a plurality of dimples, wherein the core is formed primarily of a rubber material, has a diameter of at least 31 mm, and has a hardness which gradually increases from a center to a surface thereof, the hardness difference in JIS-C hardness units between the core center and the core surface being at least 15 and, letting (I) be the average value for cross-sectional hardnesses at a position 15 mm from the core center and at the core center and letting (II) be the cross-sectional hardness at a position 7.5 mm from the core center, the hardness difference (I)-(II) therebetween in JIS-C units being not more than ±2; the envelope layer and the intermediate layer are each formed primarily of the same or different resin materials; the cover is formed primarily of a thermoplastic resin or a thermoplastic elastomer; the envelope layer, intermediate layer and cover have thicknesses which satisfy the relationship

cover thickness<intermediate layer thickness;

and the envelope layer, intermediate layer and cover have surface hardnesses (JIS-C hardness) which satisfy the relationship

envelope layer surface hardness<intermediate layer surface hardness>cover surface hardness, and

1≦(JIS-C hardness of intermediate layer surface−JIS-C hardness of envelope layer surface)≦30.

[2] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1], wherein the resin material of which the envelope layer is formed is a mixture comprising:

    
    
        100 parts by weight of a resin component composed of, in admixture,
        
            a base resin of (a) an olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid random copolymer and/or a metal ion neutralization product of an olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid random copolymer mixed with (b) an olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid-unsaturated carboxylic acid ester random terpolymer and/or a metal ion neutralization product of an olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid-unsaturated carboxylic acid ester random terpolymer in a weight ratio between 100:0 and 0:100, and
            (e) a non-ionomeric thermoplastic elastomer in a weight ratio between 100:0 and 50:50;
            (c) 5 to 150 parts by weight of a fatty acid and/or fatty acid derivative having a molecular weight of 228 to 1500; and
            (d) 0.1 to 17 parts by weight of a basic inorganic metal compound capable of neutralizing un-neutralized acid groups in the base resin and component (c).

[3] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1], wherein the cover is formed by injection molding a single resin blend composed primarily of (A) a thermoplastic polyurethane and (B) a polyisocyanate compound, which resin blend contains a polyisocyanate compound in at least a portion of which all the isocyanate groups remain in an unreacted state.

[4] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1], wherein the rubber material of the core is a polybutadiene synthesized with a rare-earth catalyst or a Group VIII metal compound catalyst.

[5] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1], wherein the intermediate layer-forming material contains an ionomer neutralized with sodium ions.

[6] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1] which satisfies the following conditions:

−15≦(JIS-C hardness of cover surface−JIS-C hardness of intermediate layer surface)<−1

0≦(JIS-C hardness of envelope layer surface−JIS-C hardness of core surface≦20.

[7] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1], wherein the core have a hardness which gradually increases from the center to the surface thereof and the hardness difference in JIS-C units therebetween is at least 17.

[8] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1], wherein the core have a hardness which gradually increases from the center to the surface thereof and the hardness difference in JIS-C units therebetween is at least 19.

[9] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1], wherein the number of the dimples on the surface of the cover is from 280 to 360.

[10] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1], wherein the diameter of the dimples on the surface of the cover is at least about 2.5 mm but not more than about 6.5 mm.

[11] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1], wherein the depth of the dimples on the surface of the cover is at least 0.08 mm but not more than 0.30 mm.

[12] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1], wherein the dimple coverage on the spherical surface of the golf ball, which is the sum of the individual dimple surface areas, each defined by the border of the flat plane circumscribed by the edge of a dimple, expressed as a ratio (SR) with respect to the spherical surface area of the ball were it to be free of dimples, is at least 60% but not more than 90%.

[13] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1], wherein the value V0 obtained by dividing the spatial volume of each dimple below the flat plane circumscribed by the edge of that dimple by the volume of a cylinder whose base is the flat plane and whose height from the base to the maximum depth of the dimple is at least 0.35 but not more than 0.80.

[14] The multi-piece solid golf ball of [1], wherein the VR value, which is the sum of the volumes of the individual dimples formed below flat planes circumscribed by the dimple edge, as a percentage of the volume of the ball sphere were it to have no dimples thereon, is at least 0.6% but not more than 1.0%.

        
        
    
    





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DIAGRAMS
FIG. 1 is a schematic sectional view showing a multi-piece solid golf ball (4-layer construction) according to the invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing positions at the interior of the core.
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing examples of hardnesses at the core center and at a remove from the center.
FIG. 4 is a top view of a golf ball showing an arrangement of dimples that may be used in the embodiments of the invention.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The invention is described more fully below. The multi-piece solid golf ball of the present invention, as shown in FIG. 1, is a golf ball G having four or more layers, including a core 1, an envelope layer 2 which encases the core, an intermediate layer 3 which encases the envelope layer, and a cover 4 which encases the intermediate layer. The cover 4 typically has a large number of dimples D formed on the surface thereof. The core 1 and the intermediate layer 3 are not limited to single layers, and may each be formed of a plurality of two more layers.
In this invention, the core diameter is set to at least 31 mm, and is generally at least 31 mm but not more than 38 mm, preferably at least 32.5 mm but not more than 37 mm, and more preferably at least 34 mm but not more than 36 mm. A core diameter outside this range will lower the initial velocity of the ball or yield a less than adequate spin rate-lowering effect after the ball is hit, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved.
The surface hardness of the core, while not subject to any particular limitation, preferably has a JIS-C hardness value of at least 70 but not more than 96, more preferably at least 76 but not more than 89, and even more preferably at least 79 but not more than 87. The center hardness of the core, while not subject to any particular limitation, preferably has a JIS-C hardness value of at least 50 but not more than 72, more preferably at least 55 but not more than 68, and even more preferably at least 60 but not more than 66. Below the above range, the rebound characteristics of the core may be inadequate, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved, and the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen. Conversely, at a core surface hardness higher than the above range, the ball may have an excessively hard feel on full shots with a driver and the spin rate may be too high, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved.
In the present invention, it is essential that the core have a hardness which gradually increases from the center to the surface thereof, the hardness difference in JIS-C units being at least 15, preferably at least 17, and more preferably at least 19, but preferably not more than 40 and more preferably not more than 35. If the difference is too small, the spin rate-lowering effect on shots with a driver (W#1) may be inadequate, preventing the desired distance from being achieved. If the difference is too large, the initial velocity on impact may decrease, as a result of which the desired distance may not be achieved, and the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen.
Moreover, referring to FIG. 2, by optimizing the respective hardnesses at the center of the core and at cross-sectional positions located 7.5 mm and 15 mm from the core center, the spin rate-lowering effect on shots taken with a W#1 can be enhanced. Specifically, letting (I) be the average value for cross-sectional hardnesses at a position 15 mm from the core center and at the core center and letting (II) be the cross-sectional hardness at a position 7.5 mm from the core center, it is critical for the hardness difference (I)-(II) therebetween in JIS-C units to be not more than ±2. This means that, referring to FIG. 3, if, for example, the core center has a JIS hardness of 61 and the JIS hardness at a position 15 mm outward from the core center is 77, with the average thereof being a JIS hardness of about 69, the hardness at a position 7.5 mm from the core center (corresponding to a point midway between the core center and the position 15 mm from the core center) is held within a range of ±2 of the above average value of 69.
That is, as shown in FIG. 3, it is desirable for the hardness profile to have a linear gradient from the core center outward.
The above hardness difference ((I)-(II)) is preferably not more than ±1 JIS-C hardness units, and is more preferably ±0; that is, identical to the above average value. If the hardness difference is too large, the spin rate-lowering effect on shots with a W#1 may be inadequate, preventing the desired distance from being achieved.
The deflection when the core is subjected to loading, i.e., the deflection of the core when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf), while not subject to any particular limitation, is preferably set within a range of 2.0 mm to 5.0 mm, more preferably 2.3 mm to 4.4 mm, and even more preferably 2.6 mm to 3.8 mm. If this value is too high, the core may lack sufficient rebound, which may result in a less than adequate distance, or the durability of the ball to cracking on repeated impact may worsen. On the other hand, if this value is too low, the ball may have an excessively hard feel on full shots with a driver, and the spin rate may be too high, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved.
A material composed primarily of rubber may be used to form the core having the above-described surface hardness and deflection. For example, the core may be formed of a rubber composition containing, in addition to the rubber component, a co-crosslinking agent, an organic peroxide, an inert filler, an organosulfur compound and the like. It is preferable to use polybutadiene as the base rubber of this rubber composition.
It is desirable for the polybutadiene serving as the rubber component to have a cis-1,4-bond content on the polymer chain of at least 60 wt %, preferably at least 80 wt %, more preferably at least 90 wt %, and most preferably at least 95 wt %. Too low a cis-1,4-bond content among the bonds on the molecule may lead to a lower resilience.
Moreover, the polybutadiene has a 1,2-vinyl bond content on the polymer chain of typically not more than 2%, preferably not more than 1.7%, and even more preferably not more than 1.5%. Too high a 1,2-vinyl bond content may lead to a lower resilience.
To obtain a molded and vulcanized rubber composition of good resilience, the polybutadiene used therein is preferably one synthesized with a rare-earth catalyst or a Group VIII metal compound catalyst. Polybutadiene synthesized with a rare-earth catalyst is especially preferred.
Such rare-earth catalysts are not subject to any particular limitation. Exemplary rare-earth catalysts include those made up of a combination of a lanthanide series rare-earth compound with an organoaluminum compound, an alumoxane, a halogen-bearing compound and an optional Lewis base.
Examples of suitable lanthanide series rare-earth compounds include halides, carboxylates, alcoholates, thioalcoholates and amides of atomic number 57 to 71 metals.
In the practice of the invention, the use of a neodymium catalyst in which a neodymium compound serves as the lanthanide series rare-earth compound is particularly advantageous because it enables a polybutadiene rubber having a high cis-1,4 bond content and a low 1,2-vinyl bond content to be obtained at an excellent polymerization activity. Suitable examples of such rare-earth catalysts include those mentioned in JP-A 11-35633, JP-A 11-164912 and JP-A 2002-293996.
To enhance the resilience, it is preferable for the polybutadiene synthesized using the lanthanide series rare-earth compound catalyst to account for at least 10 wt %, preferably at least 20 wt %, and more preferably at least 40 wt %, of the rubber components.
Rubber components other than the above-described polybutadiene may be included in the base rubber insofar as the objects of the invention are attainable. Illustrative examples of rubber components other than the above-described polybutadiene include other polybutadienes, and other diene rubbers, such as styrene-butadiene rubber, natural rubber, isoprene rubber and ethylene-propylene-diene rubber.
Examples of co-crosslinking agents include unsaturated carboxylic acids and the metal salts of unsaturated carboxylic acids.
Specific examples of unsaturated carboxylic acids include acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid and fumaric acid. Acrylic acid and methacrylic acid are especially preferred.
The metal salts of unsaturated carboxylic acids, while not subject to any particular limitation, are exemplified by the above-mentioned unsaturated carboxylic acids neutralized with a desired metal ion. Specific examples include the zinc and magnesium salts of methacrylic acid and acrylic acid. The use of zinc acrylate is especially preferred.
The unsaturated carboxylic acid and/or metal salt thereof is included in an amount, per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber, of generally at least 10 parts by weight, preferably at least 15 parts by weight, and more preferably at least 20 parts by weight, but generally not more than 60 parts by weight, preferably not more than 50 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 45 parts by weight, and most preferably not more than 40 parts by weight. Too much may make the core too hard, giving the ball an unpleasant feel on impact, whereas too little may lower the rebound.
The organic peroxide may be a commercially available product, suitable examples of which include Percumyl D (produced by NOF Corporation), Perhexa 3M (NOF Corporation), and Luperco 231XL (Atochem Co.). These may be used singly or as a combination of two or more thereof.
The amount of organic peroxide included per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber is generally at least 0.1 part by weight, preferably at least 0.3 part by weight, more preferably at least 0.5 part by weight, and most preferably at least 0.7 part by weight, but generally not more than 5 parts by weight, preferably not more than 4 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 3 parts by weight, and most preferably not more than 2 parts by weight. Too much or too little organic peroxide may make it impossible to achieve a ball having a good feel, durability and rebound.
Examples of suitable inert fillers include zinc oxide, barium sulfate and calcium carbonate. These may be used singly or as a combination of two or more thereof.
The amount of inert filler included per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber is generally at least 1 part by weight, and preferably at least 5 parts by weight, but generally not more than 50 parts by weight, preferably not more than 40 parts by weight, and more preferably not more than 30 parts by weight. Too much or too little inert filler may make it impossible to achieve a proper weight and a good rebound.
In addition, an antioxidant may be included if necessary. Illustrative examples of suitable commercial antioxidants include Nocrac NS-6, Nocrac NS-30 (both available from Ouchi Shinko Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.), and Yoshinox 425 (available from Yoshitomi Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.). These may be used singly or as a combination of two or more thereof.
The amount of antioxidant included per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber is preferably 0 or more part by weight, more preferably at least 0.05 part by weight, and even more preferably at least 0.1 part by weight, but preferably not more than 3 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 2 parts by weight, even more preferably not more than 1 part by weight, and most preferably not more than 0.5 part by weight. Too much or too little antioxidant may make it impossible to achieve a good rebound and durability.
To enhance the rebound of the golf ball and increase its initial velocity, it is preferable to include within the core an organosulfur compound.
No particular limitation is imposed on the organosulfur compound, provided it improves the rebound of the golf ball. Exemplary organosulfur compounds include thiophenols, thionaphthols, halogenated thiophenols, and metal salts thereof. Specific examples include pentachlorothiophenol, pentafluorothiophenol, pentabromothiophenol, p-chlorothiophenol, the zinc salt of pentachlorothiophenol, the zinc salt of pentafluorothiophenol, the zinc salt of pentabromothiophenol, the zinc salt of p-chlorothiophenol; and diphenylpolysulfides, dibenzylpolysulfides, dibenzoylpolysulfides, dibenzothiazoylpolysulfides and dithiobenzoylpolysulfides having 2 to 4 sulfurs. The zinc salt of pentachlorothiophenol is especially preferred.
It is recommended that the amount of the organosulfur compound included per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber be preferably at least 0.05 part by weight, and more preferably at least 0.1 part by weight, but preferably not more than 5 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 4 parts by weight, even more preferably not more than 3 parts by weight, and most preferably not more than 2.5 parts by weight. If too much organosulfur compound is included, the effects of addition may peak so that further addition has no apparent effect, whereas the use of too little organosulfur compound may fail to confer the effects of such addition to a sufficient degree.
Next, the envelope layer is described.
The material from which the envelope layer is formed has a hardness, expressed as the Durometer D hardness (measured with a type D durometer in accordance with ASTM D 2240), which, while not subject to any particular limitation, is preferably at least 40 but not more than 62, more preferably at least 47 but not more than 60, and even more preferably at least 53 but not more than 58. If the envelope layer material is softer than the above range, the ball may have too much spin receptivity on full shots, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved. On the other hand, if this material is harder than the above range, the durability of the ball to cracking under repeated impact may worsen and the ball may have too hard a feel when played. The envelope layer has a thickness which, while not subject to any particular limitation, is generally at least 1.0 mm but not more than 4.0 mm, preferably at least 1.2 mm but not more than 3.0 mm, and more preferably at least 1.4 mm but not more than 2.0 mm. Outside of this range, the spin rate-lowering effect on shots with a driver (W#1) may be inadequate, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved.
The envelope layer has a surface hardness, expressed as the JIS-C hardness, which, while not subject to any particular limitation, is preferably at least 75 but not more than 98, more preferably at least 79 but not more than 95, and even more preferably at least 83 but not more than 90. At a surface hardness lower than this range, the ball may have too much spin receptivity on full shots, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved. On the other hand, if the surface hardness is higher than the above range, the durability of the ball to cracking under repeated impact may worsen and the ball may have too hard a feel when played. It is critical for the surface of the envelope layer to be softer than the surface of the intermediate layer. While no particular limitation is imposed on the degree to which it is softer, the difference in JIS-C hardness is preferably at least 3 but not more than 20, more preferably at least 5 but not more than 18, and even more preferably at least 7 but not more than 16. Outside of this range, if the surface of the envelope is too much softer than the surface of the intermediate layer, the rebound of the ball may decrease or the spin rate may become excessive, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved.
Moreover, it is desirable that the surface of the envelope layer not be made softer than the surface of the core. While no particular limitation is imposed on the degree thereof, the value represented by (JIS-C hardness of envelope layer surface−JIS-C hardness of core surface) is preferably, in JIS-C hardness units, at least 0 but not more than 20, more preferably at least 0 but not more than 15, and even more preferably at least 1 but not more than 10. If the surface of the envelope layer is instead softer than the core surface, the spin rate-lowering effect on shots with a driver may be inadequate, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved. Moreover, if the surface of the envelope layer is harder than the core surface to a degree that falls outside of the above range, the feel of the ball on full shots may be too hard and the durability of the ball to cracking on repeated impact may worsen.
The envelope layer in the invention is formed primarily of a resin material. The resin material in the envelope layer, while not subject to any particular limitation, preferably includes as an essential component a base resin composed of, in admixture, specific amounts of (a) an olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid random copolymer and/or a metal ion neutralization product of an olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid random copolymer and (b) an olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid-unsaturated carboxylic acid ester random terpolymer and/or a metal ion neutralization product of an olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid-unsaturated carboxylic acid ester random terpolymer. That is, in the present invention, by using the material described below as the preferred material in the envelope layer, the spin rate on shots with a W#1 can be lowered, enabling a longer distance to be achieved.
The olefin in the above base resin, for either component (a) or component (b), has a number of carbons which is generally at least 2 but not more than 8, and preferably not more than 6. Specific examples include ethylene, propylene, butene, pentene, hexene, heptene and octene. Ethylene is especially preferred.
Examples of unsaturated carboxylic acids include acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid and fumaric acid. Acrylic acid and methacrylic acid are especially preferred.
Moreover, the unsaturated carboxylic acid ester is preferably a lower alkyl ester of the above unsaturated carboxylic acid. Specific examples include methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, propyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, propyl acrylate and butyl acrylate. Butyl acrylate (n-butyl acrylate, i-butyl acrylate) is especially preferred.
The olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid random copolymer of component (a) and the olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid-unsaturated carboxylic acid ester random terpolymer of component (b) (the copolymers in components (a) and (b) are referred to collectively below as “random copolymers”) can each be obtained by preparing the above-mentioned materials and carrying out random copolymerization by a known method.
It is recommended that the above random copolymers have controlled unsaturated carboxylic acid contents (acid contents). Here, it is recommended that the content of unsaturated carboxylic acid present in the random copolymer serving as component (a) be generally at least 4 wt %, preferably at least 6 wt %, more preferably at least 8 wt %, and even more preferably at least 10 wt %, but not more than 30 wt %, preferably not more than 20 wt %, even more preferably not more than 18 wt %, and most preferably not more than 15 wt %.
Similarly, it is recommended that the content of unsaturated carboxylic acid present in the random copolymer serving as component (b) be generally at least 4 wt %, preferably at least 6 wt %, and more preferably at least 8 wt %, but not more than 15 wt %, preferably not more than 12 wt %, and even more preferably not more than 10 wt %. If the acid content of the random copolymer is too low, the rebound may decrease, whereas if it is too high, the processability of the envelope layer-forming resin material may decrease.
The metal ion neutralization product of the olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid random copolymer of component (a) and the metal ion neutralization product of the olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid-unsaturated carboxylic acid ester random terpolymer of component (b) (the metal ion neutralization products of the copolymers in components (a) and (b) are referred to collectively below as “metal ion neutralization products of the random copolymers”) can be obtained by neutralizing some of the acid groups on the random copolymers with metal ions.
Illustrative examples of metal ions for neutralizing the acid groups include Na+, K+, Li+, Zn++, Cu++, Mg++, Ca++, Co++, Ni++ and Pb++. Of these, preferred use can be made of, for example, Na+, Li+, Zn++ and Mg++. To improve resilience, the use of Na+ is even more preferred.
The above metal ion neutralization products of the random copolymers may be obtained by neutralizing the random copolymers with the foregoing metal ions. For example, use may be made of a method in which neutralization is carried out with a compound such as a formate, acetate, nitrate, carbonate, bicarbonate, oxide, hydroxide or alkoxide of the above-mentioned metal ions. No particular limitation is imposed on the degree of neutralization of the random copolymer by these metal ions.
Sodium ion-neutralized ionomer resins may be suitably used as the above metal ion neutralization products of the random copolymers to increase the melt flow rate of the material. This facilitates adjustment to the subsequently described optimal melt flow rate, enabling the moldability to be improved.
Commercially available products may be used as the base resins of above components (a) and (b). Illustrative examples of the random copolymer in component (a) include Nucrel 1560, Nucrel 1214 and Nucrel 1035 (all products of DuPont-Mitsui Polychemicals Co., Ltd.), and Escor 5200, Escor 5100 and Escor 5000 (all products of ExxonMobil Chemical). Illustrative examples of the random copolymer in component (b) include Nucrel AN 4311 and Nucrel AN 4318 (both products of DuPont-Mitsui Polychemicals Co., Ltd.), and Escor ATX325, Escor ATX320 and Escor ATX310 (all products of ExxonMobil Chemical).
Illustrative examples of the metal ion neutralization product of the random copolymer in component (a) include Himilan 1554, Himilan 1557, Himilan 1601, Himilan 1605, Himilan 1706 and Himilan AM7311 (all products of DuPont-Mitsui Polychemicals Co., Ltd.), Surlyn 7930 (E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.), and Iotek 3110 and Iotek 4200 (both products of ExxonMobil Chemical). Illustrative examples of the metal ion neutralization product of the random copolymer in component (b) include Himilan 1855, Himilan 1856 and Himilan AM7316 (all products of DuPont-Mitsui Polychemicals Co., Ltd.), Surlyn 6320, Surlyn 8320, Surlyn 9320 and Surlyn 8120 (all products of E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.), and Iotek 7510 and Iotek 7520 (both products of ExxonMobil Chemical). Sodium-neutralized ionomer resins that are suitable as the metal ion neutralization product of the random copolymer include Himilan 1605, Himilan 1601 and Himilan 1555.
When preparing the above-described base resin, component (a) and component (b) must be admixed in a weight ratio of generally between 100:0 and 0:100, preferably between 100:0 and 25:75, more preferably between 100:0 and 50:50, even more preferably between 100:0 and 75:25, and most preferably 100:0. If too little component (a) is included, the molded material obtained therefrom may have a decreased resilience.
In addition, the processability of the base resin can be further improved by also adjusting the ratio in which the random copolymers and the metal ion neutralization products of the random copolymers are admixed when preparing the base resin as described above. It is recommended that the weight ratio of the random copolymers to the metal ion neutralization products of the random copolymers be generally between 0:100 and 60:40, preferably between 0:100 and 40:60, more preferably between 0:100 and 20:80, and most preferably 0:100. The addition of too much random copolymer may lower the processability during mixing.
Component (e) described below may be added to the base resin. Component (e) is a non-ionomeric thermoplastic elastomer. The purpose of this component is to further improve the feel of the ball on impact and the rebound. Examples include olefin elastomers, styrene elastomers, polyester elastomers, urethane elastomers and polyamide elastomers. To further increase the rebound, it is preferable to use a polyester elastomer or an olefin elastomer. The use of an olefin elastomer composed of a thermoplastic block copolymer which includes crystalline polyethylene blocks as the hard segments is especially preferred.
A commercially available product may be used as component (e). Illustrative examples include Dynaron (JSR Corporation) and the polyester elastomer Hytrel (DuPont-Toray Co., Ltd.).
It is recommended that component (e) be included in an amount, per 100 parts by weight of the base resin of the invention, of generally at least 0 part by weight, preferably at least 5 parts by weight, more preferably at least 10 parts by weight, and even more preferably at least 20 parts by weight, but not more than 100 parts by weight, preferably not more than 60 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 50 parts by weight, and even more preferably not more than 40 parts by weight. Too much component (e) will lower the compatibility of the mixture, possibility resulting in a substantial decline in the durability of the golf ball.
Next, component (c) described below may be added to the base resin. Component (c) is a fatty acid or fatty acid derivative having a molecular weight of at least 228 but not more than 1500. Compared with the base resin, this component has a very low molecular weight and, by suitably adjusting the melt viscosity of the mixture, helps in particular to improve the flow properties. Component (c) includes a relatively high content of acid groups (or derivatives), and is capable of suppressing an excessive loss in resilience.
The fatty acid or fatty acid derivative of component (c) has a molecular weight of at least 228, preferably at least 256, more preferably at least 280, and even more preferably at least 300, but not more than 1500, preferably not more than 1000, even more preferably not more than 600, and most preferably not more than 500. If the molecular weight is too low, the heat resistance cannot be improved. On the other hand, if the molecular weight is too high, the flow properties cannot be improved.
The fatty acid or fatty acid derivative of component (c) may be an unsaturated fatty acid (or derivative thereof) containing a double bond or triple bond on the alkyl moiety, or it may be a saturated fatty acid (or derivative thereof) in which the bonds on the alkyl moiety are all single bonds. It is recommended that the number of carbons on the molecule be generally at least 18, preferably at least 20, more preferably at least 22, and even more preferably at least 24, but not more than 80, preferably not more than 60, more preferably not more than 40, and even more preferably not more than 30. Too few carbons may make it impossible to improve the heat resistance and may also make the acid group content so high as to diminish the flow-improving effect due to interactions with acid groups present in the base resin. On the other hand, too many carbons increases the molecular weight, which may keep a distinct flow-improving effect from appearing.
Specific examples of the fatty acid of component (c) include myristic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, 12-hydroxystearic acid, behenic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, arachidic acid and lignoceric acid. Of these, stearic acid, arachidic acid, behenic acid and lignoceric acid are preferred. Behenic acid is especially preferred.
The fatty acid derivative of component (c) is exemplified by metallic soaps in which the proton on the acid group of the fatty acid has been replaced with a metal ion. Examples of the metal ion include Na+, Li+, Ca++, Mg++, Zn++, Mn++, Al+++, Ni++, Fe++, Fe+++, Cu++, Sn++, Pb++ and Co++. Of these, Ca++, Mg++ and Zn++ are especially preferred.
Specific examples of fatty acid derivatives that may be used as component (c) include magnesium stearate, calcium stearate, zinc stearate, magnesium 12-hydroxystearate, calcium 12-hydroxystearate, zinc 12-hydroxystearate, magnesium arachidate, calcium arachidate, zinc arachidate, magnesium behenate, calcium behenate, zinc behenate, magnesium lignocerate, calcium lignocerate and zinc lignocerate. Of these, magnesium stearate, calcium stearate, zinc stearate, magnesium arachidate, calcium arachidate, zinc arachidate, magnesium behenate, calcium behenate, zinc behenate, magnesium lignocerate, calcium lignocerate and zinc lignocerate are preferred.
Component (d) may be added as a basic inorganic metal compound capable of neutralizing acid groups in the base resin and in component (c). If component (d) is not included, when a metal soap-modified ionomer resin (e.g., the metal soap-modified ionomer resins cited in the above-mentioned patent publications) is used alone, the metallic soap and un-neutralized acid groups present on the ionomer resin undergo exchange reactions during mixture under heating, generating a large amount of fatty acid. Because the fatty acid has a low thermal stability and readily vaporizes during molding, it may cause molding defects. Moreover, if the fatty acid thus generated deposits on the surface of the molded material, it may substantially lower paint film adhesion and may have other undesirable effects such as lowering the resilience of the resulting molded material.




(1) un-neutralized acid group present on the ionomer resin

(2) metallic soap

(3) fatty acid

X: metal cation

Accordingly, to solve this problem, the envelope layer-forming resin material includes also, as an essential component, a basic inorganic metal compound (d) which neutralizes the acid groups present in the base resin and component (c), in this way improving the resilience of the molded material.
That is, by including component (d) as an essential ingredient in the material, not only are the acid groups in the base resin and component (c) neutralized, through synergistic effects from the proper addition of each of these components it is possible as well to increase the thermal stability of the mixture and give it a good moldability, and also to enhance the resilience.
Here, it is recommended that the basic inorganic metal compound used as component (d) be a compound having a high reactivity with the base resin and containing no organic acids in the reaction by-products, enabling the degree of neutralization of the mixture to be increased without a loss of thermal stability.
Illustrative examples of the metal ion in the basic inorganic metal compound serving as component (d) include Li+, Na+, K+, Ca++, Mg++, Zn++, Al+++, Ni++, Fe++, Fe+++, Cu++, Mn++, Sn++, Pb++ and Co++. Known basic inorganic fillers containing these metal ions may be used as the basic inorganic metal compound. Specific examples include magnesium oxide, magnesium hydroxide, magnesium carbonate, zinc oxide, sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, calcium oxide, calcium hydroxide, lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate. In particular, a hydroxide or a monoxide is recommended. Calcium hydroxide and magnesium oxide, which have a high reactivity with the base resin, are more preferred. Calcium hydroxide is especially preferred.
Because the above-described resin material is arrived at by blending specific respective amounts of components (c) and (d) with the resin component, i.e., the base resin containing specific respective amounts of components (a) and (b) in combination with optional component (e), this material has excellent thermal stability, flow properties and moldability, and can impart the molded material with a markedly improved resilience.
Components (c) and (d) are included in respective amounts, per 100 parts by weight of the resin component suitably formulated from components (a), (b) and (e), of at least 5 parts by weight, preferably at least 10 parts by weight, and more preferably at least 15 parts by weight, but not more than 150 parts by weight, preferably not more than 130 parts by weight, and more preferably not more than 120 parts by weight, of component (c); and at least 0.1 part by weight, preferably at least 0.5 part by weight, more preferably at least 1 part by weight, and even more preferably at least 2 parts by weight, but not more than 17 parts by weight, preferably not more than 15 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 13 parts by weight, and even more preferably not more than 10 parts by weight, of component (d). Too little component (c) lowers the melt viscosity, resulting in inferior processability, whereas too much lowers the durability. Too little component (d) fails to improve thermal stability and resilience, whereas too much instead lowers the heat resistance of the golf ball-forming material due to the presence of excess basic inorganic metal compound.
In the above-described resin material formulated from the respective above-indicated amounts of the resin component and components (c) and (d), it is recommended that at least 50 mol %, preferably at least 60 mol %, more preferably at least 70 mol %, and even more preferably at least 80 mol %, of the acid groups be neutralized. Such a high degree of neutralization makes it possible to more reliably suppress the exchange reactions that cause trouble when only a base resin and a fatty acid or fatty acid derivative are used as in the above-cited prior art, thus preventing the generation of fatty acid. As a result, there is obtained a resin material of substantially improved thermal stability and good processability which can provide molded products of much better resilience than prior-art ionomer resins.
“Degree of neutralization,” as used above, refers to the degree of neutralization of acid groups present within the mixture of the base resin and the fatty acid or fatty acid derivative serving as component (c), and differs from the degree of neutralization of the ionomer resin itself when an ionomer resin is used as the metal ion neutralization product of a random copolymer in the base resin. A mixture according to the invention having a certain degree of neutralization, when compared with an ionomer resin alone having the same degree of neutralization, contains a very large number of metal ions. This large number of metal ions increases the density of ionic crosslinks which contribute to improved resilience, making it possible to confer the molded product with excellent resilience.
To more reliably achieve a material having both a high degree of neutralization and good flow properties, it is recommended that the acid groups in the above-described mixture be neutralized with transition metal ions and with alkali metal and/or alkaline earth metal ions. Although transition metal ions have a weaker ionic cohesion than alkali metal and alkaline earth metal ions, the combined use of these different types of ions to neutralize acid groups in the mixture can substantially improve the flow properties.
It is recommended that the molar ratio between the transition metal ions and the alkali metal and/or alkaline earth metal ions be in a range of typically 10:90 to 90:10, preferably 20:80 to 80:20, more preferably 30:70 to 70:30, and even more preferably 40:60 to 60:40. Too low a molar ratio of transition metal ions may fail to provide a sufficient flow-improving effect. On the other hand, too high a transition metal ion molar ratio may lower the resilience.
Examples of the metal ions include, but are not limited to, zinc ions as the transition metal ions and at least one type of ion selected from among sodium, lithium and magnesium ions as the alkali metal or alkaline earth metal ions.
A known method may be used to obtain a mixture in which the desired amount of acid groups have been neutralized with transition metal ions and alkali metal or alkaline earth metal ions. Specific examples of methods of neutralization with transition metal ions, particularly zinc ions, include methods which use zinc soaps as the fatty acid derivative, methods which use zinc ion neutralization products (e.g., a zinc ion-neutralized ionomer resin) when formulating components (a) and (b) as the base resin, and methods which use zinc compounds such as zinc oxide as the basic inorganic metal compound of component (d).
The resin material should preferably have a melt flow rate adjusted to ensure flow properties that are particularly suitable for injection molding, and thus improve moldability. Specifically, it is recommended that the melt flow rate (MFR), as measured according to JIS-K7210 at a temperature of 190° C. and under a load of 21.18 N (2.16 kgf), be set to generally at least 0.6 dg/min, preferably at least 0.7 dg/min, more preferably at least 0.8 dg/min, and even more preferably at least 2 dg/min, but generally not more than 20 dg/min, preferably not more than 10 dg/min, more preferably not more than 5 dg/min, and even more preferably not more than 3 dg/min. Too high or low a melt flow rate may result in a substantial decline in processability.
Illustrative examples of the envelope layer material include those having the trade names HPF 1000, HPF 2000 and HPF AD1027, as well as the experimental material HPF SEP1264-3, all produced by E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.
Next, the intermediate layer is described.
The material from which the intermediate layer is formed has a hardness, expressed as the Durometer D hardness (measured with a type D durometer in accordance with ASTM D 2240), which, while not subject to any particular limitation, is preferably at least 50 but not more than 70, more preferably at least 55 but not more than 66, and even more preferably at least 60 but not more than 63. If the intermediate layer material is softer than the above range, the ball may have too much spin receptivity on full shots, as a result of which an increased distance may not be attained. On the other hand, if this material is harder than the above range, the durability of the ball to cracking on repeated impact may worsen and the ball may have too hard a feel when played with a putter or on short approach shots. The intermediate layer has a thickness which, while not subject to any particular limitation, is generally at least 0.7 mm but not more than 2.0 mm, preferably at least 0.9 mm but not more than 1.7 mm, and more preferably at least 1.1 mm but not more than 1.4 mm. Outside of this range, the spin rate-lowering effect on shots with a driver (W#1) may be inadequate, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved. Moreover, a thickness lower than the above range may worsen the durability to cracking on repeated impact.
The intermediate layer may be formed primarily of a resin material which is the same as or different from the above-described material used to form the envelope layer. An ionomer resin is especially preferred. Specific examples include sodium-neutralized ionomer resins available under the trade name designations Himilan 1605, Himilan 1601 and Surlyn 8120, and zinc-neutralized ionomer resins such as Himilan 1557 and Himilan 1706. These may be used singly or as a combination of two or more thereof.
An embodiment in which the intermediate layer material is composed primarily of, in admixture, both a zinc-neutralized ionomer resin and a sodium-neutralized ionomer resin is especially preferable for attaining the objects of the invention. The mixing ratio, expressed as zinc-neutralized resin/sodium-neutralized resin (weight ratio), is generally from 25/75 to 75/25, preferably from 35/65 to 65/35, and more preferably from 45/55 to 55/45.
Outside of this ratio, the ball rebound may be too low, as a result of which the desired distance may not be achieved, the durability to repeated impact at normal temperature may worsen, and the durability to cracking at low temperatures (below 0° C.) may worsen.
The surface hardness of the intermediate layer, i.e., the surface hardness of the sphere composed of the core and the envelope layer enclosed by the intermediate layer, while not subject to any particular limitation, has a JIS-C hardness of preferably at least 85 but not more than 100, more preferably at least 90 but not more than 99, and even more preferably at least 95 but not more than 98. If the surface of the intermediate layer is softer than the above range, the ball may have too much spin receptivity on full shots, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved. On the other hand, if it is harder than the above range, the durability of the ball to cracking under repeated impact may worsen and the ball may have too hard a feel when played with a putter or on short approach shots.
The intermediate layer is formed so as to have a surface hardness which is higher than the surface hardness of the core and specifically which is at least 1 but not more than 30, preferably at least 5 but not more than 20, and more preferably at least 9 but not more than 16 units higher than the JIS-C hardness at the surface of the envelope layer.
Also, the intermediate layer is formed so as to have a surface hardness which is higher than the surface hardness of the cover.
To increase adhesion between the intermediate layer material and the polyurethane used in the subsequently described cover, it is desirable to abrade the surface of the intermediate layer. In addition, it is preferable to apply a primer (adhesive) to the surface of the intermediate layer following such abrasion or to add an adhesion reinforcing agent to the intermediate layer material. Examples of adhesion reinforcing agents that may be incorporated in the material include organic compounds such as 1,3-butanediol and trimethylolpropane, and oligomers such as polyethylene glycol and polyhydroxy polyolefin oligomers. The use of trimethylolpropane or a polyhydroxy polyolefin oligomer is especially preferred. Examples of commercially available products include trimethylolpropane produced by Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Co., Ltd. and polyhydroxy polyolefin oligomers produced by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation (under the trade name designation Polytail H; number of main-chain carbons, 150 to 200; with hydroxyl groups at the ends).
Next, the cover is described. As used herein, the term “cover” denotes the outermost layer of the ball construction, and excludes what is referred to herein as the intermediate layer and the envelope layer.
The cover material has a hardness, expressed as the Durometer D hardness, which, while not subject to any particular limitation, is preferably at least 40 but not more than 60, more preferably at least 43 but not more than 57, and even more preferably at least 46 but not more than 54. At a hardness below this range, the ball tends to take on too much spin on full shots, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved. On the other hand, at a hardness above this range, on approach shots, the ball lacks spin receptivity and thus may have an inadequate controllability even when played by a professional or other skilled golfer.
The thickness of the cover, while not subject to any particular limitation, is preferably at least 0.3 mm but not more than 1.5 mm, more preferably at least 0.5 mm but not more than 1.2 mm, and even more preferably at least 0.7 mm but not more than 1.0 mm. If the cover is thicker than the above range, the ball may have an inadequate rebound on shots with a driver (W#1) or the spin rate may be too high, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved. Conversely, if the cover is thinner than the above range, the ball may have a poor scuff resistance and inadequate controllability even when played by a professional or other skilled golfer.
In the practice of invention, the cover is formed primarily of a thermoplastic resin or a thermoplastic elastomer. The use of a polyurethane as the primary material is especially preferred because it enables the intended effects of the invention, i.e., both a good controllability and a good scuff resistance, to be achieved.
The polyurethane used as the cover material, while not subject to any particular limitation, is preferably a thermoplastic polyurethane, particularly from the standpoint of amenability to mass production.
It is preferable to use a specific thermoplastic polyurethane composed primarily of (A) a thermoplastic polyurethane and (B) a polyisocyanate compound. This resin blend is described below.
To fully exhibit the advantageous effects of the invention, a necessary and sufficient amount of unreacted isocyanate groups should be present in the cover resin material. Specifically, it is recommended that the total weight of above components A and B combined be at least 60%, and preferably at least 70%, of the overall weight of the cover layer. Components A and B are described in detail below.
The thermoplastic polyurethane serving as component A has a structure which includes soft segments made of a polymeric polyol that is a long-chain polyol (polymeric glycol), and hard segments made of a chain extender and a polyisocyanate compound. Here, the long-chain polyol used as a starting material is not subject to any particular limitation, and may be any that is used in the prior art relating to thermoplastic polyurethanes. Exemplary long-chain polyols include polyester polyols, polyether polyols, polycarbonate polyols, polyester polycarbonate polyols, polyolefin polyols, conjugated diene polymer-based polyols, castor oil-based polyols, silicone-based polyols and vinyl polymer-based polyols. These long-chain polyols may be used singly or as combinations of two or more thereof. Of the long-chain polyols mentioned here, polyether polyols are preferred because they enable the synthesis of thermoplastic polyurethanes having a high rebound resilience and excellent low-temperature properties.
Illustrative examples of the above polyether polyol include poly(ethylene glycol), poly(propylene glycol), poly(tetramethylene glycol) and poly(methyltetramethylene glycol) obtained by the ring-opening polymerization of a cyclic ether. The polyether polyol may be used singly or as a combination of two or more thereof. Of these, poly(tetramethylene glycol) and/or poly(methyltetramethylene glycol) are preferred.
It is preferable for these long-chain polyols to have a number-average molecular weight in a range of 1,500 to 5,000. By using a long-chain polyol having a number-average molecular weight within this range, golf balls made of a thermoplastic polyurethane composition having excellent properties such as resilience and manufacturability can be reliably obtained. The number-average molecular weight of the long-chain polyol is more preferably in a range of 1,700 to 4,000, and even more preferably in a range of 1,900 to 3,000.
As used herein, “number-average molecular weight of the long-chain polyol” refers to the number-average molecular weight computed based on the hydroxyl number measured in accordance with JIS K-1557.
Suitable chain extenders include those used in the prior art relating to thermoplastic polyurethanes. For example, low-molecular-weight compounds which have a molecular weight of 400 or less and bear on the molecule two or more active hydrogen atoms capable of reacting with isocyanate groups are preferred. Illustrative, non-limiting, examples of the chain extender include 1,4-butylene glycol, 1,2-ethylene glycol, 1,3-butanediol, 1,6-hexanediol and 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol. Of these chain extenders, aliphatic diols having 2 to 12 carbons are preferred, and 1,4-butylene glycol is especially preferred.
The polyisocyanate compound is not subject to any particular limitation; preferred use may be made of one that is used in the prior art relating to thermoplastic polyurethanes. Specific examples include one or more selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, 2,4-toluene diisocyanate, 2,6-toluene diisocyanate, p-phenylene diisocyanate, xylylene diisocyanate, naphthylene-1,5-diisocyanate, tetramethylxylene diisocyanate, hydrogenated xylylene diisocyanate, dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate, tetramethylene diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, norbornene diisocyanate, trimethylhexamethylene diisocyanate and dimer acid diisocyanate. Depending on the type of isocyanate used, the crosslinking reaction during injection molding may be difficult to control. In the practice of the invention, to provide a balance between stability at the time of production and the properties that are manifested, it is most preferable to use 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, which is an aromatic diisocyanate.
It is most preferable for the thermoplastic polyurethane serving as above component A to be a thermoplastic polyurethane synthesized using a polyether polyol as the long-chain polyol, using an aliphatic diol as the chain extender, and using an aromatic diisocyanate as the polyisocyanate compound. It is desirable, though not essential, for the polyether polyol to be a polytetramethylene glycol having a number-average molecular weight of at least 1,900, for the chain extender to be 1,4-butylene glycol, and for the aromatic diisocyanate to be 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate.
The mixing ratio of activated hydrogen atoms to isocyanate groups in the above polyurethane-forming reaction can be controlled within a desirable range so as to make it possible to obtain a golf ball which is composed of a thermoplastic polyurethane composition and has various improved properties, such as rebound, spin performance, scuff resistance and manufacturability. Specifically, in preparing a thermoplastic polyurethane by reacting the above long-chain polyol, polyisocyanate compound and chain extender, it is desirable to use the respective components in proportions such that the amount of isocyanate groups on the polyisocyanate compound per mole of active hydrogen atoms on the long-chain polyol and the chain extender is from 0.95 to 1.05 moles.
No particular limitation is imposed on the method of preparing the thermoplastic polyurethane used as component A. Production may be carried out by either a prepolymer process or one-shot process in which the long-chain polyol, chain extender and polyisocyanate compound are used and a known urethane-forming reaction is effected. Of these, a process in which melt polymerization is carried out in a substantially solvent-free state is preferred. Production by continuous melt polymerization using a multiple screw extruder is especially preferred.
Illustrative examples of the thermoplastic polyurethane serving as component A include commercial products such as Pandex T8295, Pandex T8290, and Pandex T8260, (all available from DIC Bayer Polymer, Ltd.).
Next, concerning the polyisocyanate compound used as component B, it is essential that, in at least a portion thereof, all the isocyanate groups on the molecule remain in an unreacted state. That is, polyisocyanate compound in which all the isocyanate groups on the molecule remain in a completely free state should be present, and such a polyisocyanate compound may be present together with polyisocyanate compound in which only one end of the molecule is in a free state.
Various types of isocyanates may be employed without particular limitation as this polyisocyanate compound. Illustrative examples include one or more selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, 2,4-toluene diisocyanate, 2,6-toluene diisocyanate, p-phenylene diisocyanate, xylylene diisocyanate, naphthylene-1,5-diisocyanate, tetramethylxylene diisocyanate, hydrogenated xylylene diisocyanate, dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate, tetramethylene diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, norbornene diisocyanate, trimethylhexamethylene diisocyanate and dimer acid diisocyanate. Of the above group of isocyanates, the use of 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate and isophorone diisocyanate is preferable in terms of the balance between the influence on processability of such effects as the rise in viscosity that accompanies the reaction with the thermoplastic polyurethane serving as component A and the physical properties of the resulting golf ball cover material.
In the practice of the invention, although not an essential constituent, a thermoplastic elastomer other than the above-described thermoplastic polyurethane may be included as component C together with components A and B. Incorporating this component C in the above resin composition enables the fluidity of the resin composition to be further improved and enables increases to be made in various properties required of golf ball cover materials, such as resilience and scuff resistance.
In the addition to the above resin components, various optional additives may be included in the above-described resin materials for the envelope layer, the intermediate layer and the cover. Such additives include, for example, pigments, dispersants, antioxidants, ultraviolet absorbers, ultraviolet stabilizers, parting agents, plasticizers, and inorganic fillers (e.g., zinc oxide, barium sulfate, titanium dioxide).
Thickness Relationship Between Intermediate Layer and Cover
In the present invention, it is critical for the thicknesses of the intermediate layer and the cover to satisfy the relationship

cover thickness<intermediate layer thickness.

By having the core diameter be at least 31 mm and also suitably selecting the relative thicknesses of these respective layers, there can be obtained a golf ball which exhibits a good flight performance, controllability, durability and feel. Should the cover be thicker than the intermediate layer, the ball rebound will decrease or the ball will have excessive spin receptivity on full shots, as a result of which an increased distance will not be attainable.

Further, it is preferable to take envelope layer thickness into consideration. Namely, it is preferable to satisfy the relationship

cover thickness<intermediate layer thickness<envelope thickness.

Relationship Between Surface Hardnesses of Envelope Layer, Intermediate Layer and Cover

In the present invention, it is critical for the surface hardnesses (JIS-C hardness) of the envelope layer, the intermediate layer and the cover to satisfy the relationship:

envelope layer surface hardness<intermediate layer surface hardness>cover surface hardness.

The multi-piece solid golf ball of the invention can be manufactured using an ordinary process such as a known injection molding process to form on top of one another the respective layers described above—the core, envelope layer, intermediate layer, and cover. For example, a molded and vulcanized article composed primarily of the core material may be placed as the core within a particular injection-molding mold, following which the envelope layer-forming material and the intermediate layer-forming material may be injection-molded in this order to give an intermediate spherical body. The spherical body may then be placed within another injection-molding mold and the cover material injection-molded over the spherical body to give a multi-piece golf ball. Alternatively, the cover may be formed as a layer over the intermediate spherical body by, for example, placing two half-cups, molded beforehand as hemispherical shells, around the intermediate spherical body so as to encase it, then molding under applied heat and pressure.
The inventive golf ball has a surface hardness (also referred to as the “cover surface hardness”) which is determined by the hardness of the material used in each layer, the hardnesses of the respective layers, and the hardness below the surface of the ball. The surface hardness of the ball, expressed as the JIS-C hardness, is generally at least 83 but not more than 100, preferably at least 86 but not more than 97, and more preferably at least 88 but not more than 94. If this hardness is lower than the above range, the ball may be too receptive to spin, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved. On the other hand, if this hardness is higher than the above range, the ball may not be receptive to spin on approach shots, which may result in a less than desirable controllability even for professionals and other skilled golfers.
It is desirable for the surface hardness of the inventive golf ball to be made softer than the surface hardness of the intermediate layer by an amount within a JIS-C hardness range of 1 to 15, preferably 2 to 13, and more preferably 3 to 10. At a hardness difference smaller than this range, the ball may lack receptivity to spin on approach shots, resulting in a less than desirable controllability even for professional and other skilled golfers. At a hardness difference larger than the above range, the rebound may be inadequate or the ball may be too receptive to spin on full shots, as a result of which the desired distance may not be achieved.
Numerous dimples may be formed on the surface of the cover. The dimples arranged on the cover surface, while not subject to any particular limitation, number preferably at least 280 but not more than 360, more preferably at least 300 but not more than 350, and even more preferably at least 320 but not more than 340. If the number of dimples is higher than the above range, the ball will tend to have a low trajectory, which may shorten the distance of travel. On the other hand, if the number of dimples is too small, the ball will tend to have a high trajectory, as a result of which an increased distance may not be achieved.
Any one or combination of two or more dimple shapes, including circular shapes, various polygonal shapes, dewdrop shapes and oval shapes, may be suitably used. If circular dimples are used, the diameter of the dimples may be set to at least about 2.5 mm but not more than about 6.5 mm, and the depth may be set to at least 0.08 mm but not more than 0.30 mm.
To fully manifest the aerodynamic characteristics of the dimples, the dimple coverage on the spherical surface of the golf ball, which is the sum of the individual dimple surface areas, each defined by the border of the flat plane circumscribed by the edge of a dimple, expressed as a ratio (SR) with respect to the spherical surface area of the ball were it to be free of dimples, is preferably at least 60% but not more than 90%. Also, to optimize the trajectory of the ball, the value V0 obtained by dividing the spatial volume of each dimple below the flat plane circumscribed by the edge of that dimple by the volume of a cylinder whose base is the flat plane and whose height from the base to the maximum depth of the dimple is preferably at least 0.35 but not more than 0.80. In addition, the VR value, which is the sum of the volumes of the individual dimples formed below flat planes circumscribed by the dimple edge, as a percentage of the volume of the ball sphere were it to have no dimples thereon, is preferably at least 0.6% but not more than 1.0%. Outside of the above ranges for these values, the ball may assume a trajectory that is not conducive to achieving a good distance, as a result of which the ball may fail to travel a sufficient distance when played.
The golf ball of the invention, which can be manufactured so as to conform with the Rules of Golf for competitive play, may be produced to a ball diameter which is of a size that will not pass through a ring having an inside diameter of 42.672 mm, but is not more than 42.80 mm, and to a weight of generally from 45.0 to 45.93 g.
As shown above, by using primarily a polyurethane material in the cover, by optimizing the respective thicknesses and hardnesses of the envelope layer, intermediate layer and cover as described above, and by setting the core diameter to at least a particular size, the inventive golf ball having a multi-layer construction is highly beneficial for professionals and other skilled golfers because it lowers the spin rate on full shots with a driver, providing increased distance and good controllability, and because it has an excellent durability to cracking on repeated impact and an excellent scuff resistance.
EXAMPLES
Examples of the invention and Comparative Examples are given below by way of illustration, and not by way of limitation.
Examples 1 to 3. Comparative Examples 1 to 8
Formation of Core
Rubber compositions were formulated as shown in Table 1, then molded and vulcanized under the conditions shown in Table 1 to form cores. In Comparative Example 1, the rubber composition shown in Table 2 was prepared and vulcanized, following which the resulting center core was encased by an outer core layer (envelope layer) in an unvulcanized state, and the resulting sphere was molded and vulcanized to give a layered construction. In each of the examples, vulcanization was carried out for 15 minutes at 155° C.










TABLE 1









Example
Comparative Example


















Rubber formulation
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8





















Polybutadiene A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
95
0


Polybutadiene B
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
78
5
100


Polybutadiene C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0


Polyisoprene rubber
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0


Zinc acrylate
35.5
32.5
32.5
32.5
32.5
32.5
32.5
32.5
36.6
26.9
35.5


Peroxide (1)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.6
0


Peroxide (2)
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
3
0.6
1.2


Antioxidant (1)
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
0.1
0.1


Antioxidant (2)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0
0


Zinc oxide
27.6
28.7
28.7
18.0
28.7
30.8
23.4
63.1
26.2
28.5
20.8


Zinc salt of
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.5
0
1


pentachlorothiophenol


Zinc stearate
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
0





Note:


Numbers in the table represent parts by weight.






Trade names for some the materials appearing in the table are given below.













Polybutadiene A:
Available from JSR Corporation under the



trade name BR 01.


Polybutadiene B:
Available from JSR Corporation under the



trade name BR 730.


Polybutadiene C:
Available from JSR Corporation under the



trade name BR 51.


Polyisoprene rubber:
Available from JSR Corporation under the



trade name IR 2200.


Peroxide (1):
Dicumyl peroxide, produced by NOF



Corporation under the trade name Percumyl D.


Peroxide (2):
A mixture of 1,1-di(t-butylperoxy)-



cyclohexane and silica, produced by NOF



Corporation under the trade name Perhexa



C-40.


Antioxidant (1):
2,2′-Methylenebis(4-methyl-6-t-



butylphenol), produced by Ouchi Shinko



Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. under the



trade name Nocrac NS-6.


Antioxidant (2):
2,6′-Di-t-butyl-4-methylphenol), produced



by Ouchi Shinko Chemical Industry Co.,



Ltd. under the trade name Nocrac 200.


Zinc stearate:
Available from NOF Corporation under the



trade name Zinc Stearate G.

















TABLE 2






Comparative


(parts by weight)
Example 1

















Core
Polybutadiene B
100


formulation
Zinc acrylate
46.6



Peroxide (2)
2



Antioxidant (1)
0



Zinc oxide
12.5



Zinc salt of pentachlorothiophenol
1.5



Zinc stearate
5


Vulcanization
Temperature (° C.)
155


conditions
Time (min)
15





Note:


Details concerning Polybutadiene B and other materials above are the same as in Table 1.






Formation of Envelope Layer, Intermediate Layer and Cover

Next, the envelope layer, intermediate layer and cover formulated from the various resin components shown in Table 3 were injection-molded, thereby forming over the core, in order, an envelope layer, an intermediate layer and a cover. In Comparative Example 1, the above rubber material was used as the envelope layer. Finally, the dimples shown in Table 4 and FIG. 4, which were common to all the examples, were formed on the cover surface, thereby producing multi-piece solid golf balls.














TABLE 3





Formulation (pbw)
No. 1
No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
No. 5
No. 6
No. 7






















HPF 1000
100








HFP 2000

100


Himilan 1605



68.75
50


Himilan 1557




15


Himilan 1706




35


Himilan 1707


100


Dynaron 6100P



31.25


Behenic acid



18


Calcium hydroxide



2.3


Calcium stearate



0.15


Zinc stearate



0.15


Trimethylolpropane




1.1


Polytail H



2


Pandex T-8295






75


Pandex T-8290






25


Pandex T-8260





100


Hytrel 4001






15


Titanium oxide





3.8
3.5


Polyethylene wax





1.4
1.5


Isocyanate compound






9


(1)


Isocyanate compound





18


(2)









Trade names for some of the materials appearing in the table are given below.













HPF 1000 (trade name):
A terpolymer produced by E.I. DuPont



de Nemours & Co., and composed of



about 75 to 76 wt % ethylene, about 8.5 wt



% acrylic acid and about 15.5 to



16.5 wt % n-butyl acrylate. All (100%)



of the acid groups are neutralized



with magnesium ions.


HPF 2000 (trade name):
All (100%) of the acid groups are



neutralized with magnesium ions.


Himilan:
An ionomer resin produced by



DuPont-Mitsui Polychemicals Co., Ltd.


Dynaron 6100P:
A hydrogenated polymer produced by JSR



Corporation.


Hytrel:
A polyester elastomer produced by



DuPont-Toray Co., Ltd.


Behenic acid:
NAA222-S (beads), produced by NOF



Corporation.


Calcium hydroxide:
CLS-B, produced by Shiraishi Kogyo.


Polytail H:
A low-molecular-weight polyolefin



polyol produced by Mitsubishi Chemical



Corporation.


Pandex T-8260,
MDI-PTMG type thermoplastic


T-8290, T-8295:
polyurethanes produced by DIC Bayer



Polymer.


Isocyanate compound (1):
4,4′-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate


Isocyanate compound (2):
Crossnate EM30, an isocyanate master



batch which is produced by Dainichi



Seika Colour & Chemicals Mfg. Co.,



Ltd., contains 30% of 4,4′-diphenyl-



methane diisocyanate (measured



concentration of amine reverse-titrated



isocyanate according to JIS-K1556, 5



to 10%), and in which the master batch



base resin is a polyester elastomer.



The isocyanate compound was mixed with



Pandex at the time of injection



molding.






















TABLE 4






Number








of
Diameter
Depth


No.
dimples
(mm)
(mm)
V0
SR
VR





















1
12
4.6
0.15
0.47
0.81
0.783


2
234
4.4
0.15
0.47


3
60
3.8
0.14
0.47


4
6
3.5
0.13
0.46


5
6
3.4
0.13
0.46


6
12
2.6
0.10
0.46


Total
330









Dimple Definitions

    Diameter: Diameter of flat plane circumscribed by edge of dimple.
    Depth: Maximum depth of dimple from flat plane circumscribed by edge of dimple.
    V0: Spatial volume of dimple below flat plane circumscribed by dimple edge, divided by volume of cylinder whose base is the flat plane and whose height is the maximum depth of dimple from the base.
    SR: Sum of individual dimple surface areas, each defined by the border of the flat plane circumscribed by the edge of a dimple, as a percentage of surface area of ball sphere were it to have no dimples thereon.
    VR: Sum of volumes of individual dimples formed below flat plane circumscribed by the edge of the dimple, as a percentage of volume of ball sphere were it to have no dimples thereon.


The golf balls obtained in Examples 1 to 3 of the invention and in Comparative Examples 1 to 8 were tested and evaluated according to the criteria described below with regard to the following: surface hardness and other physical properties of each layer and the ball, flight performance, spin on approach shots (controllability), durability to repeated impact, and scuff resistance. The results are shown in Tables 5 and 6. All measurements were carried out in a 23° C. atmosphere.
(1) Core Deflection
The core was placed on a hard plate, and the deflection (mm) by the core when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) was measured.
(2) Core Surface Hardness
The surface of the core is spherical. The durometer indenter was set substantially perpendicular to this spherical surface, and JIS-C hardness measurements (in accordance with JIS-K6301) were taken at two randomly selected points on the surface of the core. The average of the two measurements was used as the core surface hardness.
(3) Hardness of Envelope Layer Material
The resin material for the envelope layer was formed into a sheet having a thickness of about 2 mm, and the hardness was measured with a type D durometer in accordance with ASTM D-2240.
(4) Surface Hardness of Envelope Layer-Covered Sphere
The durometer indenter was set substantially perpendicular to the spherical surface of the envelope layer and the JIS-C hardness measured.
(5) Hardness of Intermediate Layer Material
The same method of measurement was used as in (3) above.
(6) Surface Hardness of Intermediate Layer-Covered Sphere
The durometer indenter was set substantially perpendicular to the spherical surface of the intermediate layer and the JIS-C hardness was measured.
(7) Hardness of Cover Material
The same method of measurement was used as in (3) above.
(8) Surface Hardness of Ball
The durometer indenter was set substantially perpendicular to a dimple-free area on the ball's surface and the JIS-C hardness was measured.
(9) Flight
The carry and total distance of the ball when hit at a head speed (HS) of 47 m/s with a club (TourStage X-Drive Type 405, manufactured by Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd.; loft angle, 9.5°) mounted on a swing robot were measured. The results were rated according to the criteria indicated below. The spin rate was the value measured for the ball immediately following impact with an apparatus for measuring initial conditions.
Good: Total distance was 240 m or more
NG: Total distance was less than 240 m
(10) Spin Rate on Approach Shots
The spin rate of a ball hit at a head speed of 22 m/s with a sand wedge (abbreviated below as “SW”; J's Classical Edition, manufactured by Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd.) was measured. The results were rated according to the criteria indicated below. The spin rate was measured by the same method as that used above when measuring distance.
Good: Spin rate of 6,600 rpm or more
NG: Spin rate of less than 6,300 rpm
(11) Durability to Repeated Impact
The ball was repeatedly hit at a head speed of 40 m/s with a W#1 club mounted on a golf swing robot. The number of shots taken with the ball in Example 3 when the initial velocity fell below 97% of the average initial velocity for the first 10 shots was assigned a durability index of “100”, and similarly obtained durability indices for the balls in each example were evaluated according to the following criteria. The average value for N=3 balls was used as the basis for evaluation in each example.
Good: Durability index of 90 or more
NG: Durability index of less than 90
(12) Scuff Resistance
A non-plated pitching sand wedge was set in a swing robot, and the ball was hit once at a head speed of 40 m/s, following which the surface state of the ball was visually examined and rated as follows.
Good: Can be used again
NG: Cannot be used again










TABLE 5









Example
Comparative Example



















1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8























Core
Diameter (mm)
34.95
34.95
34.95
34.95
34.95
34.95
34.95
29.10
34.95
34.95
37.30



Weight (g)
27.25
27.25
27.25
25.84
27.36
27.51
26.55
18.18
27.25
27.25
31.90



Deflection (mm)
3.2
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.2





















Hardness (JIS-C)
Surface
85
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
86
76
85




15 mm from
80
77
77
77
77
77
77
—
74
77
80




center (i)




7.5 mm from
72
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
73
71
72




center (ii)




Center
65
62
62
62
62
62
62
62
65
64
65




[(i) + (center)]/2
73
70
70
70
70
70
70
—
70
71
73




(iii)




(ii) − (iii)
−1
−2
−2
−2
−2
−2
−2
—
+3
0
−1




Surface − center
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
21
12
20



















Envelope
Type
No. 1
No. 1
No. 2
Rubber
No. 1
No. 3
No. 1
No. 1
No. 1
No. 1
—


layer




material



Thickness (mm)
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.43
4.63
1.70
1.70
—



Specific gravity
0.96
0.96
0.96
1.16
0.94
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
—



Material hardness
54
54
51
—
54
62
54
54
54
54
—



(D)


Envelope
Surface hardness
86
86
82
89
86
100
86
86
86
86
—


layer-encased
(JIS-C)


sphere
Outside diameter
38.35
38.35
38.35
38.35
38.35
38.35
37.80
38.35
38.35
38.35
—



(mm)



Weight (g)
34.14
34.14
34.14
34.14
34.25
34.26
32.24
34.14
34.14
34.14
—


















Envelope layer surface −
+1
+4
0
+7
+4
+18
+4
+4
0
+10
—


core surface hardness


difference (JIS-C)



















Intermediate
Type
No. 5
No. 5
No. 5
No. 5
No. 4
No. 4
No. 5
No. 5
No. 5
No. 5
No. 5


layer
Thickness (mm)
1.15
1.15
1.15
1.15
1.15
1.15
0.75
1.15
1.15
1.15
1.68



Specific gravity
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.93
0.93
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95



Material hardness
62
62
62
62
56
56
62
62
62
62
62



(D)


Intermediate
Surface hardness
97
97
97
97
91
91
97
97
97
97
97


layer-encased
(JIS-C)


sphere
Outside diameter
40.65
40.65
40.65
40.65
40.65
40.65
39.3
40.65
40.65
40.65
40.65



(mm)



Weight (g)
39.50
39.50
39.50
39.50
39.50
39.50
35.57
39.50
39.50
39.50
39.50


















Intermediate layer surface −
+11
+11
+15
+8
+5
−9
+11
+11
+11
+11
—


envelope layer surface


hardness difference (JIS-C)



















Cover
Type
No. 7
No. 7
No. 7
No. 7
No. 6
No. 7
No. 7
No. 7
No. 7
No. 7
No. 7



Thickness (mm)
1.03
1.03
1.03
1.03
1.03
1.03
1.70
1.03
1.03
1.03
1.03



Specific gravity
1.16
1.16
1.16
1.16
1.16
1.16
1.16
1.16
1.16
1.16
1.16



Material hardness
52
52
52
52
58
52
52
52
52
52
52



(D)


Ball
Surface hardness
92
92
92
92
95
88
91
88
88
88
88



(JIS-C)



Outside diameter
42.70
42.70
42.70
42.70
42.70
42.70
42.70
42.70
42.70
42.70
42.70



(mm)



Weight (g)
45.50
45.50
45.50
45.50
45.50
45.50
45.50
45.50
45.50
45.50
45.50


















Ball surface − intermediate
−5
−5
−5
−5
+4
−3
−6
−9
−9
−9
−9


layer surface hardness


difference (JIS-C)



















TABLE 6









Example
Comparative Example



















1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8























Flight
Spin rate
2755
2661
2643
2695
2639
2749
2825
2882
2710
2733
2801


W#1
(rpm)


HS 47
Total
241.8
241.6
242.0
240.6
241.5
239.3
236.7
234.5
239.5
238.5
237.7



distance (m)



Rating
good
good
good
good
good
NG
NG
NG
NG
NG
NG


SW
Spin rate
6855
6734
6743
6702
6013
6893
6801
6893
6723
6789
6699


HS 22
(rpm)



Rating
good
good
good
good
NG
good
good
good
good
good
good


















Durability to
good
good
good
NG
good
good
good
good
good
good
good


repeated impact


Scuff resistance
good
good
good
good
NG
good
good
good
good
good
good









From the results shown in Table 6, in Comparative Example 1, the envelope layer was made of a rubber material, as a result of which the durability to cracking on repeated impact was poor. In Comparative Example 2, the cover (outer layer) was too hard, as a result of which the ball lacked a sufficient spin rate on approach shots and had a poor scuff resistance. In Comparative Example 3, the envelope layer was hard and the intermediate layer was made soft to confer durability. However, it was not possible to both achieve a lower spin rate and increase the initial velocity of the ball when hit, as a result of which the distance traveled by the ball was inferior. In Comparative Example 4, the cover was too thick, as a result of which a sufficient spin rate-lowering effect on shots with a W#1 was not achieved. This, combined with a decrease in the initial velocity on impact resulted in a poor distance. In Comparative Example 5, because the core was too small, the spin rate of the ball when hit with a W#1 increased, resulting in a poor distance. In Comparative Example 6, the hardness profile of the core did not approximate a straight line when plotted and the spin rate-lowering effect was inadequate, resulting in a less than satisfactory distance. In Comparative Example 7, the center and surface of the core had a small hardness difference therebetween, resulting in an inadequate spin rate-lowering effect and thus a less than satisfactory distance. The ball in Comparative Example 8 was a three-piece golf ball composed of a core encased by two layers, and thus having no envelope layer. In this ball, the spin rate-lowering effect was inadequate, as a result of which the distance traveled by the ball did not increase.

## Claims

1. A multi-piece solid golf ball comprising a core, an envelope layer encasing the core, an intermediate layer encasing the envelope layer, and a cover which encases the intermediate layer and has formed on a surface thereof a plurality of dimples, wherein the core is formed primarily of a rubber material, has a diameter of at least 31 mm, and has a hardness which gradually increases from a center to a surface thereof, the hardness difference in JIS-C hardness units between the core center and the core surface being at least 15 and, letting (I) be the average value for cross-sectional hardnesses at a position 15 mm from the core center and at the core center and letting (II) be the cross-sectional hardness at a position 7.5 mm from the core center, the hardness difference (I)-(II) therebetween in JIS-C units being not more than ±2; the envelope layer and the intermediate layer are each formed primarily of the same or different resin materials; the cover is formed primarily of a thermoplastic resin or a thermoplastic elastomer; the envelope layer, intermediate layer and cover have thicknesses which satisfy the relationship


cover thickness<intermediate layer thickness;


and the envelope layer, intermediate layer and cover have surface hardnesses (JIS-C hardness) which satisfy the relationship


envelope layer surface hardness<intermediate layer surface hardness>cover surface hardness, and



1≦(JIS-C hardness of intermediate layer surface−JIS-C hardness of envelope layer surface)≦30.

2. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1, wherein the resin material of which the envelope layer is formed is a mixture comprising:
100 parts by weight of a resin component composed of, in admixture,
a base resin of (a) an olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid random copolymer and/or a metal ion neutralization product of an olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid random copolymer mixed with (b) an olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid-unsaturated carboxylic acid ester random terpolymer and/or a metal ion neutralization product of an olefin-unsaturated carboxylic acid-unsaturated carboxylic acid ester random terpolymer in a weight ratio between 100:0 and 0:100, and
(e) a non-ionomeric thermoplastic elastomer in a weight ratio between 100:0 and 50:50;
(c) 5 to 150 parts by weight of a fatty acid and/or fatty acid derivative having a molecular weight of 228 to 1500; and
(d) 0.1 to 17 parts by weight of a basic inorganic metal compound capable of neutralizing un-neutralized acid groups in the base resin and component (c).

3. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1, wherein the cover is formed by injection molding a single resin blend composed primarily of (A) a thermoplastic polyurethane and (B) a polyisocyanate compound, which resin blend contains a polyisocyanate compound in at least a portion of which all the isocyanate groups remain in an unreacted state.

4. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1, wherein the rubber material of the core is a polybutadiene synthesized with a rare-earth catalyst or a Group VIII metal compound catalyst.

5. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1, wherein the intermediate layer-forming material contains an ionomer neutralized with sodium ions.

6. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1 which satisfies the following conditions:


−15≦(JIS-C hardness of cover surface−JIS-C hardness of intermediate layer surface)<−1



0≦(JIS-C hardness of envelope layer surface−JIS-C hardness of core surface≦20.

7. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1, wherein the core have a hardness which gradually increases from the center to the surface thereof and the hardness difference in JIS-C units therebetween is at least 17.

8. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1, wherein the core have a hardness which gradually increases from the center to the surface thereof and the hardness difference in JIS-C units therebetween is at least 19.

9. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1, wherein the number of the dimples on the surface of the cover is from 280 to 360.

10. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1, wherein the diameter of the dimples on the surface of the cover is at least about 2.5 mm but not more than about 6.5 mm.

11. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1, wherein the depth of the dimples on the surface of the cover is at least 0.08 mm but not more than 0.30 mm.

12. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1, wherein the dimple coverage on the spherical surface of the golf ball, which is the sum of the individual dimple surface areas, each defined by the border of the flat plane circumscribed by the edge of a dimple, expressed as a ratio (SR) with respect to the spherical surface area of the ball were it to be free of dimples, is at least 60% but not more than 90%.

13. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1, wherein the value V0 obtained by dividing the spatial volume of each dimple below the flat plane circumscribed by the edge of that dimple by the volume of a cylinder whose base is the flat plane and whose height from the base to the maximum depth of the dimple is at least 0.35 but not more than 0.80.

14. The multi-piece solid golf ball of claim 1, wherein the VR value, which is the sum of the volumes of the individual dimples formed below flat planes circumscribed by the dimple edge, as a percentage of the volume of the ball sphere were it to have no dimples thereon, is at least 0.6% but not more than 1.0%.