alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3765 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 

Medical Services for Children program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2024 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. BUDD) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the 

Emergency Medical Services for Children program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Medical 

5 Services for Children Reauthorization Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF GRANTS FOR EMERGENCY 

7 MEDICAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN. 

8 Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 300w–9(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘and 

10 $22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024’’ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3765 IS

1 and inserting ‘‘$22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 

2 through 2024, and $24,334,000 for each of fiscal years 

3 2025 through 2029’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2



CFO CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd. (“Advantage”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Craig Blackwood, Vice
President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Advantage, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Advantage.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  March 25, 2015 | /s/ Craig Blackwood                               
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|                      | Craig Blackwood                                   
|                      | Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-2743 |
|------------------------------------|----------|

 

DWS Strategic Income Fund

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 10/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 10/31/08 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

----
Pickering 

J. 

plea agreement, this assertion has no support in the record. Accordingly, 

we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

Saitta 

cc. Hon. Steve L. Dobrescu, District Judge 

Rodney Halbower 

Attorney General/Carson City 

White Pine County District Attorney 

Attorney GeneraVEly 

White Pine County Clerk 

2In light of this disposition, we deny as moot appellant's motions for 

appointment of counsel and to continue litigation. We have reviewed all 

documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of 

this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those 

submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to 

present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously 

presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in 

the first instance. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A
#### Ernestine R. KIEFER, Appellant, v. Richard R. KIEFER, Appellee.

No. 73-366.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 14, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Group 1 Software, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Mark Funston, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

|1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/
Mark Funston  Chief Financial Officer  February 17, 2004
| | ------------------------------------------------------------

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donald G. Bauer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Secure Luggage
      Solutions Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Secure Luggage Solutions Inc.                                                                 

Dated: May 16, 2011

| | /s/Donald G. Bauer                             
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | Donald G. Bauer                                
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                  
| | Secure Luggage Solutions Inc.                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Secure Luggage
Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Secure Luggage Solutions Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
#### Jerrold A. BROSS, Appellant, v. Rudy UNDERDOWN, as Tax Collector for Brevard County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-371.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 6, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Thomas R. Waddell, Jr., Judge.

Appeal quashed.
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Group 1 Software, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Robert S. Bowen, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

|1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/
Robert S. Bowen  Chief Executive Officer  February 17, 2004
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------

---
### 116 Nev. 307, 309-311, 998 P.2d 163, 164-65 (2000) (concluding that

defendant's statements on the record constituted a waiver and obviated the need for the State to offer proof of his prior convictions); see also Hodges v. State, 

### 119 Nev. 479, 484, 78 P.3d 67, 70 (2003) (to satisfy due process concerns prior to habitual criminal adjudication, It] here is less chance for mistakes or abuse of the stipulation process as long as a defendant must at least admit that he received specific prior convictions").

At the preliminary hearing, certified copies of the judgments of conviction and additional documents related to Adakai's two prior misdemeanor domestic battery convictions were admitted as exhibits; the additional documents establish the constitutional validity of the prior convictions. The criminal information filed in the district court listed the two prior domestic battery convictions. At his arraignment, defense counsel informed the district court that Adakai was "going to be pleading to domestic battery, third offense." Upon questioning by the district court, Adakai admitted to receiving two prior domestic battery convictions. A review of the arraignment and plea canvass indicates that Adakai fully understood that he was pleading to third-offense domestic battery. The State did not offer copies of the prior judgments of conviction into evidence at the arraignment, however, defense counsel informed the district court that she "reviewed them, your Honor, and I believe they're legally sufficient." At the sentencing hearing, there is no indication that the State offered copies of the prior judgments into evidence. Nevertheless, we conclude that Adakai's admission and defense counsel's statements

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 

### 2J.

J. constituted a waiver and stipulation to the proof of the two prior convictions used for enhancement purposes. Therefore, we further conclude that Adakai is not entitled to relief, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 1



### / Hardesty

Parraguirre

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge State Public Defender/Carson City Attorney General/Carson City Storey County District Attorney Storey County Clerk

'The fast track statement and response do not comply with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because the text is not double-spaced. Counsel for the parties are cautioned that the failure to comply with the briefing requirements in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 3
AAM-11-034-E 

November 9, 2010 

 Exemption No. 10161 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-1121 

Mr. Andy Rosman 

President 

Barrier Island Aviation 

407 Airport Road 

Manteo, NC 27954 

Dear Mr. Rosman: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated November 2, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Barrier Island Aviation for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Barrier Island 

Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Barrier Island Aviation. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant 

of exemption; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Barrier Island Aviation an exemption from part 120 to the 

extent necessary to allow Barrier Island Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of 

the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to 

the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Barrier Island Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol 

regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Barrier Island Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on November 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Dr. Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. 

Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
Exhibit 101


		
			Exhibit 10.1 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			AMENDMENT TO THE 
		

		
			2013 EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
		

		
			OF PRICESMART, INC.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			This Amendment to the PriceSmart, Inc. 2013 Equity Award Plan (the “Plan”), is effective as of November 9, 2017.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			1.Section 8.6 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			2. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			[Signature page follows]
		

		

		

		 

 

		
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of PriceSmart, Inc. has duly executed this Amendment to be effective as of November 9, 2017.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						PRICESMART, INC.

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ Francisco Velasco

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						Name:

					
					
						Francisco Velasco

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						Title:

					
					
						Executive Vice President, General Counsel

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						and Secretary

					
					
						 

				



		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
No. 9573.

#### The Pennsylvania Co. *v.*Glaser.

(Decided November 27, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Columbiana County.

*Messrs. Carey & Mullins,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. P. M. Smith,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Crew, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
# L_2006095EN.01001201.xml

| 4.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 95/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 95/12

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2006/109/EC of 19 January 2006 accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain castings originating in the People's Republic of China

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 47 of 17 February 2006
  )

On page 61, in Article 1, under the 15th exporting producer on the list:

for:

‘Shane City Fangyuan Casting Co., Ltd., West of Nango Village, Shiliting Town, Shane City, Hebei Province’,

read:

‘Shahe City Fangyuan Casting Co., Ltd., West of Nango Village, Shiliting Town, Shahe City, Hebei Province’.

---
#### STATE ROAD DEPT. v. CANAVERAL MARINE INC.

No. 38378.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 219 So.2d 483.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220 

October 21, 2011 

Jeffrey J. Hurd, Esq. 

Senior Vice President – 

Human Resources and Communications 

American International Group, Inc. 

180 Maiden Lane

22nd Floor 

New York, NY 10038-4925 

Re: Compensation Payments and Structure for AIG “Top 25” Employee 

Dear Mr. Hurd: 

Pursuant to the Department of the Treasury’s Interim Final Rule, TARP Standards for 

Compensation and Corporate Governance (the “Rule”),1

 on April 1, 2011, the Office of the 

Special Master issued a determination letter (the “2011 Determination Letter”) to American 

International Group, Inc. (“AIG”), with respect to 2011 compensation payments and structures 

for AIG’s “top 25” executive officers and most highly compensated employees. 31 C.F.R. 

§ 30.16(a)(3)(i). 

AIG requested a change in the compensation of an employee who has received a 

significant promotion that will substantially increase the employee’s responsibilities. The total 

direct compensation that AIG has proposed for this employee is reasonable relative to the total 

direct compensation paid to persons in similar positions or roles at similar entities. The change 

would increase the stock salary rate and target long-term restricted stock award, but the cash 

salary rate would remain unchanged. In light of the particular facts as communicated by AIG 

with respect to such employee’s promotion and role at AIG, and as previously discussed with 

you, the Office of the Special Master has approved this request. Accordingly, Exhibit I to the 

2011 Determination Letter is hereby amended as follows: 

Employee ID Cash Salary Stock Salary

Long-Term 

Restricted Stock

Total Direct 

Compensation

219 $500,000 $1,937,500 $812,500 $3,250,000 

The approval in this letter applies only to the employee referenced above and shall not be 

relied upon by anyone with respect to any other facts or circumstances. Such conclusion is 

 

1

 The Interim Final Rule and all determination letters issued by the Office of the Special Master are available at 

www.financialstability.gov (click on “Executive Compensation” and follow the link to “Executive Compensation 

Rules and Guidance” or “Special Master Determination Letters, Fact Sheets, and Reports”, as applicable).
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3706 

AN ACT 

To amend section 3663A of title 18, United States Code, 

to clarify that restitution includes necessary and reasonable expenses incurred by a person who has assumed 

the victim’s rights. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3706 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Victims’ Voices Out3 side and Inside the Courtroom Effectiveness Act’’ or the 

4 ‘‘Victims’ VOICES Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. RESTITUTION FOR EXPENSES OF PERSONS WHO 

6 HAVE ASSUMED THE VICTIM’S RIGHTS. 

7 Section 3663A(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(4) CLARIFICATION.—In ordering restitution under 

10 this section, a court shall order the defendant to make 

11 restitution to a person who has assumed the victim’s 

12 rights under paragraph (2) to reimburse that person’s 

13 necessary and reasonable— 

14 ‘‘(A) lost income, child care, transportation, and 

15 other expenses incurred during and directly related 

16 to participation in the investigation or prosecution of 

17 the offense or attendance at proceedings related to 

18 the offense; 

19 ‘‘(B) lost income, transportation, and other ex20 penses incurred that are directly related to trans21 porting the victim for necessary medical and related 

22 professional services and devices relating to physical, 

23 psychiatric, and psychological care, including non24 medical care and treatment rendered in accordance 

25 with a method of healing recognized by the law of 

26 the place of treatment; and 
3 

†S 3706 ES

1 ‘‘(C) lost income, transportation, and other ex2 penses incurred that are directly related to trans3 porting the victim to receive necessary physical and 

4 occupational therapy and rehabilitation.’’. 

Passed the Senate February 29, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3706 

AN ACT 

To amend section 3663A of title 18, United States 

person who has assumed the victim’s rights. essary and reasonable expenses incurred by a Code, to clarify that restitution includes nec-
p.1 

OAR Box 1672 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

V 

Document Number: 

) ll-C-21 

Docket Number: 

A-98-13 

Printed 9/30/2008 11:01:00 AM Sheet 50 of 132 
P.2 

A 98 13 

ll-C-Z I 

From: 

To: 

Subject: 

Copies to: 

Date sent: 

Bill Allmond 

NACD 

Self <PES1 RTP/GLAFLAM> 

BILLNACD <BILLNACD@aol.com> 

EPA Site Visits & Survey 

PES1 RTP/BHANEKE.PES1 RTP/JHELMS, SHEDD.STEVE@EPA.GOV 

Thu, 26 Mar 1998 13:33:05 -0500 (EST) 

Bill: 

Sorry you couldn't call in on the Roundtable. Also, thanks for the 

list of five large companies. As we finalize the mailing list, is 

there another group (perhaps 20 to 30 more) of your members we could 

consider sending to? We realize that perhaps some of them would have 

to return a letter stating that none of their facilities satisfies the 

5/12.5 tpy cutoffs. On the other hand, we want to be sure we have 

included a "representative" number of companies with the 

blending/packaging specialty. 

We have added a third (pipeline) facility to our list of site visits 

in Texas/Oklahoma, and wish to add one more visit, preferably to a 

site that blends/packages and has rail movement of liquids. The best 

location for this facility would be in the Houston area. Note that 

the 5/12.5 emission cutoff restriction does not apply to our site 

visits; however, a larger operation would be preferable. I'd like to 

call you tomorrow or Monday to discuss candidate sites to round out 

our trip. (No specific dates yet, but looking at the period between 

April 13 and 24.) 

I'll talk to you soon. 

Greg LaFlam 

PES, Inc. 

co 

Greg LaFlam 1 ~ Mon, 13 Apr 1998 14:52:55