alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 15

- 2210

___________ NASIR FINNEMEN,

Appellant

v. JONATHAN YODER , Camden County Sheriff Officer

____________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil Action No. 1

- 14

- cv - 02479) District Judge: Honorable Renee M. Bumb

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

February 17, 2016 Before: FISHER, SHWARTZ and COWEN, Circuit J udges

(Opinion filed : February 18, 2016 )

___________ OPINION *

___________ PER CURIAM

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 d oes not constitute binding precedent.2

Pro se litigant Nasir Finnemen appeals the District Court’s denial of his motion to file an appeal out of time. We will affirm. 1 Nasir Finnemen filed a civil right s complaint in U.S. District Court in Camden, New Jersey, alleging that Officer Jonathan Yoder of the Camden County Sheriff’s Office used excessive force when escorting Finnemen from a courtroom in Camden County Superior Court. On May 20, 2014, the Distri ct Court dismissed the case with prejudice for failure to state a claim, finding that Finnemen’s allegations, even if true, did not set
out a Fourteenth Amendment claim for excessive force. The District Court’s six

- page order did not constitute a separa te judgment, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, thereby delaying the entry of judgment for 150 days, which was on October 17, 2014. On December 2, 2014, Finnemen filed an untimely notice of appeal and a timely motion for permission to appeal out of time. In the motion, Finnemen stated that he was proceeding pro se, that he was not aware of the appellate deadlines, that he is disabled, and that he had several different required appointments. Although the District Court failed to recognize that Finneman’s Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) motion was timely, the District Court concluded that even if Finneman’s Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) motion had been timely, he had not shown excusable neglect or good cause as required by the rule.

1 Finnemen has filed a motion to file a supplement appendix. We grant that motion, and we have reviewed Finnemen’s submission.3

We have jurisdi ction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The District Court’s denial of Finnemen’s Rule 4(a)(5) motion is subject to review for abuse of discretion. See Ramseur v. Beyer , 921 F.2d 504, 506 (3d Cir. 1990).
We find the District Court did not abuse its discreti on in denying Finnemen’s motion. The explanations Finnemen offered do not, without more, demonstrate that the District Court erred in denying his motion. We will affirm.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Telegen Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew
      DeVries, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated
                as of February 23, 2007
            
            /s/
                Matthew DeVriesMatthew
                DeVries
              Chief
                Financial Officer
No. 00-851.

#### Moore *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-28-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC 
Tariff

November 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 31, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, Third Revised Sheet No. 226, to 
become effective on December 1, 1997.
    Northern's tariff currently provides that Northern shall have the 
right to restrict the hourly takes of gas by the Shipper to 6.3% of 
their firm entitlement. Northern is herein proposing to modify the 
above provision by prefacing it with the phrase, ``Unless Northern and 
Shipper mutually agree otherwise.'' This modification will allow 
Northern and a shipper the opportunity to have facilities designed or 
realign firm entitlement from one delivery point to another in a more 
cost efficient manner.
    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Northern's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 of and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make protestant a party to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29557 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,006
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                14,363
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     26,010
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,360
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            18,050
<LOANS>                                         74,968
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,767
<DEPOSITS>                                     123,719
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,720
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                997
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 143,767
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,812
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,949
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   608
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,369
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,603
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,659
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,710
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     (23)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,694
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,009
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,009
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.75
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,282
<LOANS-PAST>                                        82
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,733
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       27
<RECOVERIES>                                        45
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,728
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,728
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: National  compensation survey. State and local government. Omaha-Council  Bluffs, NE-IA [electronic resource]
SuDocs Number: L 2.121/27:OM 1/
Item    Number: 0768-B-27    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000868096
 
 
 
2007
2008
2009
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  May 19, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1613 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1613

  To secure the southern border of the United States against illegal 
               border crossings, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2021

 Mrs. Boebert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To secure the southern border of the United States against illegal 
               border crossings, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop the Biden Caravan Now Act''.

SEC. 2. SECURE SOUTHERN BORDER.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, 
shall--
            (1) transfer all structures, equipment, personnel, and 
        other barriers used to provide additional security in the 
        District of Columbia from January 12 through the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, including what was used for the 
        Inauguration of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris as President and 
        Vice President of the United States, to the southern border of 
        the United States;
            (2) determine as soon as reasonably feasible where to erect 
        and place the structures, equipment, personnel, and other 
        barriers in order to impede to the greatest extent possible 
        illegal border crossings into the United States; and
            (3) ensure such structures, equipment, personnel, and other 
        barriers remain intact along the southern border until--
                    (A) a determination is made by the Secretary of 
                Homeland Security, in consultation with the 
                Commissioner of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 
                that the southern border is secure and illegal border 
                crossings are no longer feasible; and
                    (B) such a determination made pursuant to 
                subparagraph (A) is affirmed by a two-thirds majority 
                vote in the House of Representatives and the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
#### Frank RICHARDS v. Thelma Ford MARLOW et al.

No. 60304.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1977.

In re: Frank Richards, applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of *677Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Tensas. 347 So.2d 281.

Writ denied. The result is correct.

DENNIS, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
December 20,2010

James J. Duffy

Chief Human Resources Officer

Ally Financial Inc.

1177 Avenue ofthe Americas

New York, NY 10036

Re: Supplemental Determination Regarding

Compensation Payments and Structures

Dear Mr. Duffy:

Pursuant to the Department ofthe Treasury's Interim Final Rule on TARP Standards for

Compensation and Corporate Governance (the "Rule"), on March 23,2010, the Special Master

issued a determination with respect to compensation payments and structures for the senior

executive officers and next 20 most highly compensated employees ("Covered Employees 1

25") ofAlly Financial Inc. ("Ally", formerly General Motors Acceptance Corporation Financial

Services). 31 C.F.R. § 30.16(a)(3)(i). Also pursuant to the Rule, on April 16, 2010, the Special

Master issued a determination with respect to compensation structures for certain other Ally

executive officers and most highly compensated employees ("Covered Employecs 26 - 100"

and, collectively with Covered Employees 1 26, "Covered Employees"). 31 C.F.R. §

30.16(a)(3)(ii).

Ally has informed the Office ofthe Special Master that it is considering the relocation of

certain executives. This step would involve the possible relocation of up to five ofCovered

Employees 1 25 and up to five ofCovered Employees 26 - 100.

The determinations require that Covered Employees be paid no more than $25,000 in

perquisites and "other" compensation, absent exceptional circumstances for good cause shown.

With respect to an individual employee in the Covered Employees group, a relocation

undertaken at the request ofthe company constitutes exceptional circumstances, and such

circumstances constitute good cause for the company to pay such employee's reasonable

relocation expenses under a program the terms and conditions of which are satisfactory to the

Office ofthe Special Master, provided that a tax gross-up is not a reasonable relocation expense

and that the costs incurred by Ally do not exceed an average of$225,000 per relocated

employee.

The approvals in this letter apply only to the relocation of up to ten Covered Employees

(up to five from the Covered Employees 1 25 group and up to five from the Covered

Employees 26 100 group). Such conclusions are limited to the authority vested in the Special
Master by Section 30.16(a)(3) ofthe Rule, and shall not constitute, or be construed to constitute,

the judgment ofthe Office ofthe Special Master or the Department ofthe Treasury with respect

to the compliance ofthe proposed compensation payments or structure or any other

compensation payments or structure for the subject employees with any other provision ofthe

Rule. Moreover, my evaluation and conclusion have relied upon, and are qualified in their

entirety by, the accuracy ofthe materials submitted by Ally to the Office ofthe Special Master,

and the absence of any material misstatement or omission in such materials.

Very truly yours,

Patricia Geoghegan

Office ofthe Special Master for

TARP Executive Compensation

cc: Drema M. Kalajian, Esq.

Richard Strahota

2
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
 JURISDICTION OFORGANIZATIONSUBSIDIARY
    
    OR REGISTRATION
    
    
    PERCENT OWNEDEden Insurance Company, Inc.
    
    New York
    
    
    100
    %Rainbow Garden Corp.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Regional MSG Holdings LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %MSG Eden Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Madison Square Garden, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Continental Road LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Garden Programming, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Madison Square Garden CT, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %MSG Aircraft Leasing, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %MSG Flight Operations, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %MSG Chicago, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %NY Rangers Enterprises Company
    
    Nova Scotia
    
    
    100
    %The 31st Street Company, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Radio City Productions LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %The Grand Tour, LLC
    
    New York
    
    
    100
    %Radio City Trademarks, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %MSG Aviator, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %MSG Training Center, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %MSG National Properties LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %MSG Boston Theatrical, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %MSG Winter Productions, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %MSG Vaudeville, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %FUSE Holdings LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %FUSE Networks LLC
    
    New York
    
    
    100
    %FUSE Programming Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %SportsChannel Associates
    
    New York
    
    
    100
    %
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0637 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WALTER JASON PURKHISER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 26 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 11 2024

07/11/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0637
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-308 

________________________________________________________________________ 

FISHERIES 

Pacific Coast Albacore Tuna 

Vessels and Port Privileges 

 Agreement amending the Annexes of 

Treaty of May 26, 1981 Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CANADA, as Amended 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington June 12, 2009 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 CANADA 

 Fisheries: Pacific Coast Albacore Tuna 

 Vessels and Port Privileges 

Agreement amending the annexes of treaty of May 26, 1981, 

 as amended. 

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Washington 

 June 12, 2009; 

Entered into force March 8, 2010.
****

 

 

 

**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund, a series of DWS Advisor Funds, on Form N-CSR; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| December 28, 2007 | /s/Michael G. Clark                                               |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              | Michael G. Clark                                                  |
|              | President                                                         |
|              | DWS Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund, a series of DWS Advisor Funds |

 

 

----
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/28

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 28 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL