alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
33.1







Management’s
Assessment on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria




Management
of Hyundai Capital America (“the Company”)  is responsible for
assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to
the servicing of auto receivable backed security transactions serviced by the
Company and issued on or after January 1, 2006 (the “Platform”), except for the
criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(1)(iii)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iv),
1122(d)(3)(iii)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ix)-(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the
Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with
respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2009 (“the Reporting Period”).  With respect
to Applicable Servicing Criteria 1122(d)(2)(iii) and 1122(d)(4)(iii), there were
no activities performed during the year ended December 31, 2009 with respect to
the Platform, because there were no occurrences of events that would require the
Company to perform activities.




With
respect to servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv), management has
engaged a vendor to perform specific, limited or scripted activities required by
these servicing criteria. The Company’s management has determined that this
vendor is not considered a “servicer” as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation
AB, and the Company’s management has elected to take responsibility for
assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to the vendor as
permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance
Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations (“Interpretation 17.06”).
Management has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable
assurance that the vendor’s activities comply in all material respects with the
servicing criteria applicable to the vendor. The Company’s management is solely
responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply
Interpretation 17.06 for the vendor and related criteria.




The
Company’s management has assessed the Company’s compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.




Based on
such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year ended December
31, 2009, the Company has complied in all material respects with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and
Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of the Platform.




KPMG LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to management’s assessment of compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.







/s/MIN SOK RANDY PARK


Min Sok
Randy Park


Vice
President, Corporate Planning and Finance


Date:  March
23, 2010
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 21.1




                                MID OCEAN LIMITED
                                       AND
                                  SUBSIDIARIES



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  % Beneficial          Jurisdiction
                                                                  Ownership by                    of
                                                              Immediate Parent         Incorporation
                                                              ----------------         -------------
<S>                                                           <C>                     <C>
Mid Ocean Limited                                                           --        Cayman Islands

   Mid Ocean Holdings Ltd.                                                 100               Bermuda
       Mid Ocean Reinsurance Company Ltd.                                  100               Bermuda
          Baltusrol Holdings Limited                                        51               Bermuda
          Mid Ocean Reinsurance Consulting GmbH                            100               Germany

       Ridgewood Holdings Ltd.                                             100               Bermuda
          The Brockbank Group plc                                          100        United Kingdom
              Brockbank Holdings Limited                                   100        United Kingdom
                 Baltusrol Holdings Limited                                 49               Bermuda
              Brockbank Underwriting Limited                               100        United Kingdom
                 Brockbank Syndicate  Management Limited                   100        United Kingdom
                 Admiral Insurance Services Limited (1)                   85.5        United Kingdom
                    Admiral Services (Europe) Limited                      100        United Kingdom
                    Able Insurance Services Limited                        100        United Kingdom
                 Brockbank Personal Lines Limited                          100        United Kingdom
                    Zenith Policy Services Limited                         100        United Kingdom
                 Cassidy Brockbank Limited                                 100        United Kingdom
                 Brockbank Insurance Services Ltd.                         100        United Kingdom
              Dornoch Limited                                              100        United Kingdom
              County Down Limited                                          100        United Kingdom
</TABLE>

(1) Admiral Insurance Services Limited shares are held 80% by Brockbank
    Syndicate Management Limited in trust on behalf of the syndicate names. 5.5%
    are held directly by Brockbank Underwriting Limited.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:See attachments.
#### Rowena SPENCER, M.D. v. Harry A. BURGLASS, Esq.

No. 5962.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 8, 1974.

Michael H. Bagot, John McGuckin, Jr., George M. Leppert, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Harry A. Burglass, Metairie, for defendant-appellee.

Before REDMANN and STOULIG, JJ„ and FLEMING, J. Pro Tem.

REDMANN, Judge.

To a physician’s tort suit alleging defendant attorney at law had both filed and tried a medical malpractice suit without *69(as we construe the allegations) ever having *any*medical expert evidenceJ of malpractice, defendant filed an exception of no cause of action, asserting as a defect the petition’s failure to allege malice.

Judgment below maintained that exception, while granting 15 days “to file supplemental and amended pleadings in this matter under penalty of dismissal.” More than 15 days thereafter, without having amended, plaintiff appeals from that judgment. There was no subsequent judgment of dismissal.

We conclude, on our motion, that such a judgment is not appealable. We have previously ruled that time to appeal runs not from the judgment maintaining an exception where that judgment also grants leave to amend (we reasoned such a judgment *is not appealable),*but from the subsequent judgment dismissing the suit for failure to amend; Imperial Trading Co. v. Rouse, La.App.1967, 194 So.2d 417. The analogous judgment which maintains an exception of vagueness, but which also grants leave to amend, has been held unappeala-ble; Sonnier v. Allstate Ins. Co., La.App. 1967, 198 So.2d 694.

Appeals may only be taken from “a final judgment * * * and from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury.” C.C.P. art. 2083. The prohibition of other appeals by this legislation, the article’s Comment (a) advises, “is universal in order to prevent piecemeal appeals.”

Plaintiff in argument advises that she simply cannot allege malice in fact and therefore did not amend. Under the circumstances, she argues that we should treat the judgment as converted by her deliberate inaction into a final, and therefore appealable, judgment of dismissal.

We find this theory attractive insofar as it would enable us to decide the merits of this case rather than remand it because of a procedural defect. We recognize and gladly undertake the obligation imposed by C.C.P. art. 5051 to use procedural rules to implement the substantive law and not as an end in themselves. But, even after the specified period of leave to amend has passed, a plaintiff may still amend, unless the defendant has already moved for dismissal; Roby v. Leonard, La.App.1968, 209 So.2d. 182. Therefore we cannot hold that the mere passage of the specified period converts the conditional maintaining of the exception into a final judgment of dismissal. To so rule in order to procedurally speed the case of this plaintiff would procedurally destroy the cases of other plaintiffs like those in *Roby*and *Imperial Trading.*

We conclude that the judgment appealed from is not final. Nor is it irreparably injurious. C.C.P. art. 2083 therefore requires that this appeal be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. Costs will await final outcome.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Stone Harbor Investments, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Michael Toups
                                 ----------------------
                                 Michael Toups
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer

October 25, 2010
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-427 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SPACE COOPERATION 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ITALY 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington February 19 and April 27, 2009 

with 

Memorandum of Understanding 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ITALY 

Space Cooperation 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes 

 at Washington February 19 and 

 April 27, 2009; 

 Entered into force April 27, 2009. 

 With memorandum of understanding.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-

Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles K. Barbo, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 14, 2004



---

Charles K. Barbo

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Checklist For Applications Required Items To Be Submitted

(For distribution and file maintenance, please include: An Original Application and 2 Copies)

___ SF-424 APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE, with original signature, including:

SF-424 A, Budget by categories and indirect cost rate

SF-424 B, Assurances for non-construction programs

 ASSURANCES NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS CERTIFICATION

___ CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING and SF LLL (Applicable if EPA 

funds are over $100,000)

 

___ EPA FORM 4700-4 PRE-AWARD COMPLIANCE REVIEW REPORT

___ NARRATIVE STATEMENT (Work Plan)

___ QUALITY ASSURANCE NARRATIVE STATEMENT, if applicable

___ DETAILED ITEMIZED BUDGET

___ COPY OF NEGOTIATED INDIRECT COST RATE AGREEMENT

 KEY CONTACTS FORM

___ BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

___ COMPLETE APPLICATION RECEIPT LETTER (If you want to receive notification of

receipt)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED IF APPLICABLE

(1) If you are submitting your application under the Federal Demonstration Project, please

indicate it in block 11 of the Standard Form (SF) 424.

(2) If your project requires an Environmental Impact Statement or Environmental Assessment, or

both, please indicate it on a separate sheet of paper.

(3) If your project involves human testing studies, please indicate it on a separate sheet of paper.

(4) If your project involves animal testing studies, please indicate it on a separate sheet of paper.
# L_2006072DE.01001801.xml

| 11.3.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 72/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 72/18

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2183/2005 der Kommission vom 22. Dezember 2005 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1782/2003 des Rates mit gemeinsamen Regeln für Direktzahlungen im Rahmen der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik und mit bestimmten Stützungsregelungen für Inhaber landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 795/2004 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Betriebsprämienregelung gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1782/2003 des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 347 vom 30. Dezember 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 347 vom 30. Dezember 2005

Seite 59, Artikel 48e Absatz 2 Buchstabe b der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 795/2004:

anstatt:

| „b) | des Referenzbetrags, der für jeden Betriebsleiter der restlichen Erhöhung der regionalen Obergrenze entspricht, geteilt durch die Zahl der Zahlungsansprüche, die der Betriebsinhaber spätestens zum Ablauf der Antragsfrist im Rahmen der Betriebsprämienregelung 2006 besitzt.“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

des Referenzbetrags, der für jeden Betriebsleiter der restlichen Erhöhung der regionalen Obergrenze entspricht, geteilt durch die Zahl der Zahlungsansprüche, die der Betriebsinhaber spätestens zum Ablauf der Antragsfrist im Rahmen der Betriebsprämienregelung 2006 besitzt.“

muss es heißen:

| „b) | des Referenzbetrags, der für jeden Betriebsleiter der restlichen Erhöhung der regionalen Obergrenze entspricht, geteilt durch die Zahl der Zahlungsansprüche, die dem Betriebsinhaber spätestens zum Ablauf der Antragsfrist im Rahmen der Betriebsprämienregelung 2006 gehören.“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

des Referenzbetrags, der für jeden Betriebsleiter der restlichen Erhöhung der regionalen Obergrenze entspricht, geteilt durch die Zahl der Zahlungsansprüche, die dem Betriebsinhaber spätestens zum Ablauf der Antragsfrist im Rahmen der Betriebsprämienregelung 2006 gehören.“

---
Exhibit 31.02





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14





I, Clay Newton, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A of FX Energy, Inc.





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Dated: March 9, 2011








/s/ Clay Newton





Clay Newton


Principal Financial Officer
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of American United Gold Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, David Uppal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 19th day of June, 2008.

BY:
DAVID UPPAL                        David  Uppal, Principal Executive Officer **
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


     To my  knowledge,  this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30,
2002 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information  contained in this Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of Kentucky National Bancorp, Inc.



                                By: /s/ Lawrence P. Calvert
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Lawrence P. Calvert
                                    Title:  Chief Executive Officer



                                By: /s/ Ronald J. Pence
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Ronald J. Pence
                                    Title: President and Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 13, 2002
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Rodney L. Gray,
certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K
of Cobalt International Energy, Inc.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;  4.The registrants other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:  a.Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;  b.Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and  c.Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.The registrants other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a.All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Date:
  March 30, 2010
  /s/ Rodney L. GrayRodney L. GrayChief Financial Officer
  and Executive Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Coastal  Caribbean Oils & Minerals,
Ltd.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Kenneth M. Cornell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.



Date:  April 30, 2004                                By /s/ Kenneth M. Cornell
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Kenneth M. Cornell
                                                     Chief Accounting and
                                                     Financial Officer





A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Coastal  Caribbean  Oils & Minerals,  Ltd.  and will be retained by
Coastal  Caribbean  Oils & Minerals,  Ltd. and furnished to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.