alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3699 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3699

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include expenses for 
   certain nonathletic supplies in the above-the-line deduction for 
  eligible educators, and to allow such deduction to interscholastic 
                   sports administrators and coaches.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2024

Mr. Scott of South Carolina (for himself and Ms. Hassan) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include expenses for 
   certain nonathletic supplies in the above-the-line deduction for 
  eligible educators, and to allow such deduction to interscholastic 
                   sports administrators and coaches.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Creating Opportunity for Athletic 
Coaches to Help Educate Students Act'' or the ``COACHES Act''.

SEC. 2. UPDATES TO ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION FOR EDUCATORS.

    (a) In General.--Section 62 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2)(D)--
                    (A) in the header, by adding ``and other 
                instructional school personnel'' at the end,
                    (B) by striking ``(other than nonathletic supplies 
                for courses of instruction in health or physical 
                education)'', and
                    (C) by striking ``in the classroom'' and inserting 
                ``as part of instructional activity'', and
            (2) in subsection (d)(1), by inserting ``interscholastic 
        sports administrator or coach,'' after ``counselor,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual
Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 30, 2009 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the
formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2009-1 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Corp.,
AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS Sensub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from June 30, 2009 through December 31,
2009, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my
knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                      |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                      |  | 
|                                     |  |                                      | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/    James Fehleison               |  |  |  | Dated: March 26, 2010
|                                     |  | James Fehleison                      |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President, Controller |  |  |  |
#### WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. JOS. L. ROZIER MACHINERY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and Plantation Apartments of Orlando, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 71-686.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 26, 1972.

*39Jesse P. Williams, of Moore, Welbaum, Zook & Jones, Orlando, for appellant.

J. Stuart Smith, of Law Offices of Smith & Smith, Orlando, for appellee-Jos. L. Rozier Machinery Co.

Clyde A. Reese, Jr., of Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones & Gay, Jacksonville, for ap-pellee-Plantation Apartments of Orlando, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Westchester Fire Insurance Company from an adverse judgment rendered by the Circuit Court for Orange County, Florida. We have carefully considered the appellant’s points on appeal and, with the exception mentioned herein, hold them to be without merit. The final judgment awarded Jos. L. Rozier Machinery Company a judgment for $9,048.00 on its claims against appellant arising out of a payment bond and a contract under which Rozier claimed as a third-party beneficiary. In addition Rozier was awarded an attorney’s fee in the amount of $1,800.00 for the services of its attorney in the trial court. Under the facts of this case, the only basis we can discern for this fee is Section 627.756, F. S.1971, F.S.A. (formerly § 627.0905, F.S. 1969). The amount of the fee, however, exceeds the limit provided by that statute by $669.00. Therefore, on remand the trial court shall reduce the attorney’s fee awarded to Rozier by $669.00. In all other respects the final judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified and remanded with instructions.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT**

**CERTIFIEDPUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

TDK Mediactive, Inc.

Calabasas, California 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-48158, 333-63567, 333-11481 and 333-11483) of TDKMediactive, Inc. (formerly known as Sound Source Interactive, Inc.) of our report dated April 10, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

April 10, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 164 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 164

To authorize the Seminole Tribe of Florida to lease or transfer certain 
                     land, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2021

   Mr. Soto introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Seminole Tribe of Florida to lease or transfer certain 
                     land, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED TO VALIDATE CERTAIN LAND TRANSACTIONS 
              OF THE SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
without further approval, ratification, or authorization by the United 
States, the Seminole Tribe of Florida may lease, sell, convey, warrant, 
or otherwise transfer all or any part of the interest of the Seminole 
Tribe of Florida in any real property that is not held in trust by the 
United States for the benefit of the Seminole Tribe of Florida.
    (b) Trust Land Not Affected.--Nothing in this section--
            (1) authorizes the Seminole Tribe of Florida to lease, 
        sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer all or any part of 
        an interest in any real property that is held in trust by the 
        United States for the benefit of the Seminole Tribe of Florida; 
        or
            (2) affects the operation of any law governing leasing, 
        selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise transferring any 
        interest in any real property that is held in trust by the 
        United States for the benefit of the Seminole Tribe of Florida.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28804]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems 
(1205).
    Date & Time: November 19-20, 1997; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
530, Arlington, VA.
    Contact Person: Dr. Ken Chong, Program Director, Structural 
Systems Program, Division of Civil and Mechanical Systems, Room 545, 
NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230 703/306-1316.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Structural Systems CAREER 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason For Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and 
(6) of the Government Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 27, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-28804 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

DILLON DELIN CARTER, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 22-0221 PRPC

Appeal from the Superior Court in Yavapai County

No. P1300CR201700370

The Honorable Debra R. Phelan, Judge Pro Tempore

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

APPEARANCES

Yavapai County Attorney’s Office, Prescott

By Karolina J. Czaplinska

Counsel for Respondent

Dillon Delin Carter, Kingman

Petitioner

FILED 2-16-2023
STATE v. CARTER

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Judge David D. Weinzweig, Judge Randall M. Howe, and Judge D. Steven 

Williams delivered the decision of the court. 

PER CURIUM:

¶1 Dillon Delin Carter petitions this court for review of the 

dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. For reasons stated, we 

grant review and deny relief.

¶2 Carter pled guilty to attempted sexual conduct with a minor, 

molestation of a child, and sexual abuse, all dangerous crimes against 

children (“DCAC”). In 2017, the trial court sentenced Carter to a flat term 

of 10 years’ imprisonment, followed by lifetime probation. In 2022, Carter 

petitioned for post-conviction relief. The court summarily dismissed the 

petition because it was untimely. This petition for review followed.

¶3 Carter claims newly discovered evidence and a significant 

change in the law entitle him to an evidentiary hearing. See Ariz. R. Crim. 

P. 33.1(e), (g). Specifically, he argues that a 2021 amendment to A.R.S. § 13-

702(A) constitutes a significant change in law and that he should be 

resentenced as a first-time felony offender instead of a DCAC offender. 

¶4 We review the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief for 

an abuse of discretion. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012).

¶5 Generally, a defendant must petition for post-conviction relief 

within 90 days after sentencing. Ariz. R. Crim. P. 33.4(b)(3)(A). However, a 

claim arising under Rules 33.1(b) through (h) may be filed after 90 days, if 

the defendant “explain[s] the reasons . . . for not raising the claim in a timely 

manner.” Ariz. R. Crim. P. 33.2(b)(1). The defendant must also file the claim 

“within a reasonable time after discovering the basis for the claim.” Ariz. R. 

Crim. P. 33.4(b)(3)(B).

¶6 Carter offered no explanation why he failed to timely raise his 

claim. Consequently, it is precluded. Carter also failed to raise a colorable 

claim because he did not identify what amendment to § 13-702 constituted 

a “transformative event” that applies to his case. State v. Shrum, 220 Ariz. 

115, 120, ¶ 15 (2009). Furthermore, a new legal claim is not newly
STATE v. CARTER

Decision of the Court

3

discovered evidence under the rule. See State v. Serna, 167 Ariz. 373, 374

(1991) (describing the elements required for a claim of newly discovered 

evidence). For these reasons, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in 

summarily dismissing Carter’s claims.

¶7 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0418

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: 

JENNIFER L. RUSSUM, 

 Petitioner and Appellant, 

 and 

MATTHEW S. WENDT, 

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file her reply 

brief, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant shall have up to and including April 18, 

2022, to file her reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 24 2022

03/24/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0418
#### John PITTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-982.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 17, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
A-1

HHF Georgia Date: October 1, 2018

Eligible Entity Information:

SCHEDULE A

BASIC INFORMATION

Name of the Eligible Entity: GHFA Affordable Housing, Inc. 

Corporate or other organizational form: Non-profit corporation 

Jurisdiction of organization: State of Georgia

Notice Information:

HFA Information:

Name of HFA: Georgia Housing and Finance Authority

Organizational form: A body corporate and politic, instrumentality of the 

state and a public corporation performing an 

essential governmental function (and not a state 

agency)

Date of Application: September 1, 2010

Date of Action Plan: September 1, 2010

Notice Information:

Program Participation Cap: $370,574,260.00

Portion of Program Participation Cap

Representing Original HHF Funds: N/A

Portion of Program Participation Cap

Representing Unemployment HHF Funds: $126,650,987.00

Rounds 1-4 Funding Allocation: $339,255,819.00

Round 5 Funding Allocation: $31,318,441.00

Program Funds: $322,722,144.00

Permitted Expenses: $47,852,116.00
A-2

Closing Date: September 23, 2010

First Amendment Date: September 29, 2010

Second Amendment Date: December 16, 2010

Third Amendment Date: June 28, 2011

Fourth Amendment Date: May 3, 2012

Fifth Amendment Date: December 12, 2013

Sixth Amendment Date: January 31, 2014

Seventh Amendment Date: October 10, 2014

Eighth Amendment Date: July 30, 2015

Ninth Amendment Date: May 3, 2016

Eligible Entity DepositoryAccount Information: See account information set forth in the

Depository Account Control Agreement 

between Treasury and Eligible Entity 

regarding the HHF Program.
Exhibit (j)

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of DWS Advisor Funds on Form N-1A ("Registration Statement") of our
report dated May 27, 2009 relating to the financial statements and financial
highlights which appears in the March 31, 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders of
DWS Lifecycle Long Range Fund, which is also incorporated by reference into the
Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the
headings "Financial Statements", "Financial Highlights" and "Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm" in such Registration Statement.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
July 27, 2009
#### George FERGUSON, Petitioner, v. Carolyn FERGUSON, Respondent.

No. 40783.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 22, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 243 So.2d 439.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
##### 



COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Robert J. Landis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comprehensive Care Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants second fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Robert J. LandisJanuary 12, 2005
    
    Robert J. LandisChairman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 18
No. 9905.

#### The Bookwalter Wheel Co. *v.*Mitchell.

(Decided January 29, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Montgomery County.

*640*Messrs. Van Deman, Burkhart & Shea,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs McMahon & McMahon*.and *Mr. W. A. Reiter,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Strategic Government Securities Fund, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| July 1, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark                      |
|--------------|------------------------------------------|
|         | Michael G. Clark                         |
|         | President                                |
|         | DWS Strategic Government Securities Fund |

 

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Strategic Government Securities Fund, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| July 1, 2009 | /s/Paul Schubert                         |
|--------------|------------------------------------------|
|         | Paul Schubert                            |
|         | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer    |
|         | DWS Strategic Government Securities Fund |