alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.B**
**Certification**
I, D. Dwight Scott, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of El Paso CGP Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 12, 2005                 /s/ D. Dwight Scott   D. Dwight Scott    Executive Vice President and
ffg_ex103.htm

EXHIBIT 10.3

 

Binding Director Term Sheet

 

Effective December 26, 2017 (the “Effective Date”) Abraham Rosenblum (the “Director”) and First Foods Group, Inc. (the “Corporation”), represented by the majority of the Board of Directors of the Corporation (collectively the “Parties”), enter into this Binding Term Sheet (the “Term Sheet”) as follows:

 

Responsibilities and Consideration:

 


	- 	The Director will continue to serve on the Board of Directors of the Corporation and be responsible for day to day duties for the benefit of the Corporation.
	
 
	
 

	- 	The Director’s compensation may consist of cash-based and/or share-based compensation.
	
 
	
 

	- 	The Director’s cash-based compensation for the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 will be $10,000 per quarter paid on a date determined by the majority vote of the Board of Directors.
	
 
	
 

	- 	The Director’s share-based compensation for the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 will be a one-time award of warrants (the “Warrants”); the terms of which will be detailed in a forthcoming Warrant Agreement (the “Warrant Agreement”). In principle, the Warrant Agreement will include the following terms:



 


	
 
	
o
	Number and Type – The Director is entitled to a one-time award of Warrants for 200,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”) of the Corporation, as equal to five (5) shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock (the “Common Stock”), including liquidation preference over Common Stock.
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
o
	Duration – The Warrants entitle the Director to purchase the Preferred Stock from the Corporation, after January 1, 2018 (the “Original Issuance Date”) and before December 31, 2024.
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
o
	Purchase Price - The Purchase Price is $0.51 per share of Preferred Stock.
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
o
	Vesting - The Warrants are subject to a 12-month period whereby the Warrants vest in equal monthly increments from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Vesting Period”).
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
o
	Ratio of Ownership – For the duration of the Vesting Period, the owners of the Corporation’s Preferred A Stock shall not issue share-based compensation that would alter the ratio of share-based compensation that existed among and between the directors and/or officers of the corporation at the inception of the Vesting Period.



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Term Sheet as of the Effective Date.

 


	
 
			
FIRST FOOD GROUP, INC. 
	
 

	
 
			
 
		
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Abraham Rosenblum
		
By: 
	
/s/ Mark J. Keeley 
	
 

	
 
	
Abraham Rosenblum
	
 
	
 
	
Mark J. Keeley
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
		
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
By: 
	
/s/ Hershel Weiss 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Hershel Weiss
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 99-708 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

Earth Sciences 

 Agreements Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ICELAND 

Amending and Extending the Memorandum of 

Understanding of January 28 and April 9, 1982 

As Amended and Extended 

Signed at Reston and Reykjavik June 9 and 

July 8, 1999 

 and 

Signed at Reykjavik and Reston March 25 and 

April 12, 2007 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 ICELAND 

 Scientific Cooperation: Earth Sciences 

Agreements amending and extending the memorandum of understanding 

 of January 28 and April 9, 1982, as amended and extended. 

Signed at Reston and Reykjavik June 9 and July 8, 1999; 

Entered into force July 8, 1999. 

And signed at Reykjavik and Reston March 25 and April 12, 2007; 

Entered into force April 12, 2007.
NO. 07-04-0059-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	MARCH 23, 2004

	______________________________

	IN THE INTEREST OF N. H., A MINOR CHILD

	________________________________

	FROM THE 223RD DISTRICT COURT OF GRAY COUNTY;

	NO. 32,008; HONORABLE PHIL N. VANDERPOOL, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J.1

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant Tammie Bennett-Hayes filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her daughter, N. H.  The order was signed on October 31, 2003, and the notice of appeal was filed on February 13, 2004.  We dismiss this purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.

	An appeal from an order terminating the parent-child relationship is accelerated and  governed by the rules for accelerated appeals in civil cases.  See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §§ 109.002(a) and 263.405(a) (Vernon 2002).  Rule 26.1(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that in an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed within 20 days after the order is signed.  Moreover, neither a motion for new trial, a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, nor any other post-trial motion will extend the deadline for filing a notice of appeal under Rule 26.1(b).  See § 263.405(c); see also In re T.W., 89 S.W.3d 641 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 2002, no pet.).  

	After the termination order was signed on October 31, 2003, Bennett-Hayes filed a motion for new trial.  She did not, however, file her notice of appeal until February 13, 2004.  Pursuant to Rule 42.3(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, by letter dated February 26, 2004, this Court requested that Bennett-Hayes show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  No response was received.

	Although the Supreme Court has directed us to construe the Rules of Appellate Procedure reasonably and liberally so that the right to appeal is not lost by imposing requirements not absolutely necessary to effect the purpose of a rule, Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 616-17 (Tex. 1997), regarding our jurisdiction, we are prohibited from enlarging the time for perfecting an appeal in a civil case.  Tex. R. App. P. 2; see generally Denton County v. Huther, 43 S.W.3d 665 (Tex.App.–Fort Worth 2001, no pet.) (dismissing an accelerated appeal for want of jurisdiction where appellants failed to file their notice of appeal within 20 days after the date the order was signed); see also In re D.K.P., No. 07- 03-0356-CV, 2003 WL 22175937, *1 (Tex.App.–Amarillo Sept. 17, 2003, no pet. h.) (recognizing that applying the exceptions of Rule 26.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to extend the time in which to file a notice of appeal would thwart the policy underlying an accelerated appeal).

	Accordingly, this purported appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


National Defense Panel Meeting

AGENCY: DOD, National Defense Panel.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
meeting of the National Defense Panel on November 3, 1997. In 
accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
Public Law 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App. II, (1982)], it has been 
determined that this National Defense Panel meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1982), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public from 0900-1700, November 3, 1997 in order 
for the Panel to discuss classified material.

DATES: November 3, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Suite 532, 1931 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Arlington VA.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Defense Panel was established 
on January 14, 1997 in accordance with the Military Force Structure 
Review Act of 1996, Public Law 104-201. The mission of the National 
Defense Panel is to provide the Secretary of Defense and Congress with 
an independent, non-partisan assessment of the Secretary's Quadrennial 
Defense Review and an Alternative Force Structure Analysis. This 
analysis will explore innovative ways to meet the national security 
challenges of the twenty-first century.

PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND AGENDA: The National Defense Panel will meet in 
closed session from 0900-1700 on November 3. During the closed session 
the Panel will hear the NDP staff presentations on Cost & Budget 
Issues, Reserves, Alliances and Report Outline Review on Infrastructure 
at the Crystal Mall 3 office.

    The determination to close the meeting is based on the 
consideration that it is expected that discussion will involve 
classified matters of national security concern throughout.
    This Notification also is written verification that the Panel was 
unable to provide notice of this meeting 15 days prior to the date of 
the meeting, due to the scheduling conflicts with the Program Managers 
who will brief the Panel.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please contact the National Defense Panel at (703) 602-4175/6.

    Dated: October 30, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-29184 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

OH-08 Ashland County Rd 1027 Slide 

Repair

Road Stabilization & 

Repair

U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers - Pleasant Hill 

Lake Dam

Ashland County 

Engineer

Ashland 2015

OH-09 Krause Road Roadway 

Reconstruction

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

- Ottawa National Wildlife 

Refuge

Benton Township 

Board of Trustees Benton 2016

OH-10 Lindsey-Limestone Road Roadway 

Reconstruction

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

- Ottawa National Wildlife 

Refuge

Benton Township 

Board of Trustees Benton 2016

OH-11 Ottawa-Lucas Road Roadway 

Reconstruction

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

- Ottawa National Wildlife 

Refuge

Benton Township 

Board of Trustees Benton 2016

OH-12 Pine Creek Road - Phase 3 Roadway 

Reconstruction

U.S. Forest Service - 

Wayne National Forest

Scioto County 

Engineer's Office Scioto 2015

OH-13 Gallia Road Improvements 

(County Road 60)

Roadway 

Reconstruction

U.S. Forest Service - 

Wayne National Forest

Gallia County 

Engineer's Office Gallia 2015

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Ohio Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear Program of 

Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Ohio FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Ohio Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2018

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County Fiscal Year*

OH-14 Veler Road Improvement Roadway Resurfacing

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

- Ottawa National Wildlife 

Refuge

Jerusalem 

Township Lucas 2017

OH-15 County Road 1A Paving Roadway Resurfacing U.S. Forest Service - 

Wayne National Forest

Athens County 

Engineer Athens 2016

OH-16 Balduf Road Roadway 

Reconstruction

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

- Ottawa National Wildlife 

Refuge

Erie Township Ottawa 2016

OH-17 Boston Mills Road (County 

Highway 32)

Roadway Resurfacing & 

Parking Lot 

Construction

National Park Service - 

Cuyahoga Valley National 

Park

Summit County 

Engineer Summit 2017

Ohio Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2018

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The Ohio PDC does not have a firm date for the next Call 

for Projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. 

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
December 20, 1996

Refer to: HNG-14

Hayes E. Ross, Jr., P.E., Ph.D.

Professor, Civil Engineer Department

Head, Structural Systems Division, TTI

The Texas A&M University System

Texas Transportation Institute

College Station, Texas 77843-3135

Dear Dr. Ross:

Your November 22 letter to Mr. Gerald L. Eller requested the Federal Highway Administration’s

acceptance of three changes to the ET-2000 guardrail terminal. These are:

 1. Use of 1980-mm (6'- 6") soil tubes without soil plates for posts 1 and 2.

 2. Use of standard CRT posts for posts 3 through 7. This results in replacing the 

 shortened, tube-supported posts 3 and 4 with full length CRT posts and in replacing 

 the original CRT post 8 with a standard line post.

 3. Elimination of the offset block at post 2, permitting the use of an in-line strut at 

 ground level.

A review of our files indicated that these same modifications were requested for the NCHRP

Report 230 ET-2000 in an April 19, 1995, letter from Mr. David R. Lewis to Mr. Jerry L. Poston

and were accepted via our return correspondence dated April 25, 1995. However, the ET-2000

design you submitted and we recognized, with Mr. Jerry L. Poston’s August 22, 1995, letter to

Mr. Don H. Johnson of Syro, Inc., as an acceptable Report 350 design was unchanged from the

original Report 230 ET-2000 design. In your letter you cite a Report 350 test on a terminal very

similar to the ET-2000 that incorporates approximately the same features we had accepted as

modifications to the Report 230 design and for which you are now requesting acceptance as

meeting Report 350 guidelines. We concur that the results of that test support acceptance of the

modified ET-2000 as meeting the acceptance guidelines in NCHRP Report 350.
 2

Enclosed is a drawing showing the modified ET-2000, which is named the LET. Thus, the LET is

acceptable for use on the National Highway System if proposed by a highway agency. Since it is

a proprietary feature, the provisions of Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411,

are applicable.

Please send us a complete set of the final drawings for our files.

Sincerely yours,

(original signed by Dwight A. Horne)

Dwight A. Horne, Chief

Federal-Aid and Design Division

Enclosure

Acceptance letter CC-12D
# L_2005276EN.01002701.xml

| 21.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 276/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 276/27

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1727/2005

of 20 October 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 10th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 10th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 39,694 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

2

---
No. 9630.

#### The Lake Erie & Western Railroad Co. *v.*Tierney.

(Decided October 2, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Allen County.

*566*Mr. John B. Cochrum; Messrs. Richie & Richie*and *Mr. W. H. Leete,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Cable & .Parmenter,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 0& 

# 269 ) ll-K-(I)- J " Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:57

AM Sheet 269of 325P. 2

II-K-(B)-8 6 COMPLIANC E MONITORIN G COST S FO R NE W INDUSTRIA L BOILER S I N IFCAM . Lette r fro

m P . Johnson , EEA

t o R . Short , EPA:EAB . Apri l 27 , 1982 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-8 6
# L_2005048EN.01004501.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 48/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 48/45

---

COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2005/142/CFSP

of 17 February 2005

amending Joint Action 2004/789/CFSP on the extension of the European Union Police Mission in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (EUPOL Proxima)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and, in particular, Articles 14 and 25(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 November 2004 the Council adopted Joint Action 2004/789/CFSP (1) extending the European Union Police Mission (EUPOL Proxima) in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia from 15 December 2004 to 14 December 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 November 2004 the Council adopted Joint Action 2004/789/CFSP (1) extending the European Union Police Mission (EUPOL Proxima) in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia from 15 December 2004 to 14 December 2005.

| (2) | The Political and Security Committee should be authorised to take the relevant decisions on the setting-up of a Committee of Contributors for EUPOL Proxima, in line with the document on ‘Consultations and Modalities for the Contribution of non-EU States to EU Civilian Crisis Management’ approved by the Council on 10 December 2002. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Political and Security Committee should be authorised to take the relevant decisions on the setting-up of a Committee of Contributors for EUPOL Proxima, in line with the document on ‘Consultations and Modalities for the Contribution of non-EU States to EU Civilian Crisis Management’ approved by the Council on 10 December 2002.

| (3) | Joint Action 2004/789/CFSP should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Joint Action 2004/789/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

The following paragraph shall be added to Article 9 of Joint Action 2004/789/CFSP:

‘7.   The Political and Security Committee shall take the relevant decisions on the setting-up of a Committee of Contributors.’

Article 2

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 17 February 2005.

For the Council

The President

J.-C. JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 24.11.2004, p. 40.

1

---