alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Exhibit 32.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Comprehensive Care Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 29, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 12, 2004 (the Report),
Robert J. Landis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Robert J. LandisRobert J. LandisChairman, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerApril 12, 2004
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Comprehensive Care
Corporation and will be retained by Comprehensive Care Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 24
Exhibit 4.1


 


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


December 29, 2017


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 361 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on December 28, 2017, in
accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We
consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-220968) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the
sale of the Units of the Trusts and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO




Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                           7,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,097
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,893
<PP&E>                                           9,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,465
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,604)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,640
<SALES>                                         18,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,853
<CGS>                                           16,589
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   236
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   201
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,112)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (345)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,767)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,767)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.96)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1754 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1754

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal 
    Communications Commission to consider market entry barriers for 
 socially disadvantaged individuals in the communications marketplace 
                  report under section 13 of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Measuring the Economics Driving 
Investments and Access for Diversity Act of 2021'' or the ``MEDIA 
Diversity Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. CONSIDERING MARKET ENTRY BARRIERS FOR SOCIALLY DISADVANTAGED 
              INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 13(d) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 163(d)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Considering socially disadvantaged individuals.--In 
        assessing the state of competition under subsection (b)(1) and 
        regulatory barriers under subsection (b)(3), the Commission, 
        with the input of the Office of Communications Business 
        Opportunities of the Commission, shall consider market entry 
        barriers for socially disadvantaged individuals in the 
        communications marketplace in accordance with the national 
        policy under section 257(b).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1754

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal 
    Communications Commission to consider market entry barriers for 
 socially disadvantaged individuals in the communications marketplace 
                  report under section 13 of such Act.
```
1

King, Melanie

From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 7:28 PM

To: King, Melanie

Cc: Wayland, Robertj; Elman, Barry

Subject: Interagency Comments under EO 12866 on RIN 2060-AR33 Supplemental NPRM

Attachments: Interagency Comments under EO 12886 on RIN 2060_AR33_10152014.docx; EO 12866

_EGUs Indian CountryTerritories 2060-AR33 RIA_20140925

_InteragencycommentsunderEO12866.docx; EO 12866_EGUs Indian CountryTerritories 

2060-AR33 SupNPRM_20140926_EO12866InteragencyComments.docx

Hi Melanie,

Attached are the interagency comments on the Indian country and Territories supplemental NPRM.   

The only major issue we may need to discuss is the treatment of the fuel savings in the RIA (treating the savings as a

benefit, rather than a cost savings).  I’d like to have our economist involved in that discussion, and unfortunately, she is

not in the office tomorrow. Let me know if we should set something up for early next week on that issue.

Let me know if you all think a call tomorrow is still necessary.

Regards,

Cortney
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29692]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-346-009]


Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

November 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 31, 1997, Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff revised tariff 
sheets in compliance with the Commission's ``Order on Rehearing'' dated 
October 16, 1997 (the ``October 16 Order''). Equitrans proposes 
separate rate sheets to be effective September 1, 1997 and October 1, 
1997.
    Equitrans states that the rate sheets establish rates for all 
services which reflect a return on equity level of 13 percent which was 
the level which Equitrans originally proposed in this proceeding. 
Equitrans states that the Commission permitted to place its originally 
filed return on equity level into effect, effective September 1, 1997, 
subject to refund, pending the outcome of a hearing.
    Equitrans states that the rates proposed for October 1, 1997 
effectiveness are the same base rates for all services as those 
proposed for September 1, 1997 effectiveness with the exception of an 
increase in the ACA charge to $0.0022/Dth which has been approved by 
the Commission for October 1, 1997 effectiveness.
    Equitrans states that copies of this rate filing were served on 
Equitrans' jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest the filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20046, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests should 
be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining appropriate action, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29692 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Trench N3

Trench N1

5 4 3 2 1 0

North meters South

5 4 3 2 1 0

TRENCH N4 EAST WALL

21

22

21

22

Trench N2

bioturbated

root root

bioturbated bioturbated

bioturbated

u100

u110

u80

u90

u50

u60

u30

u40

u70

Plow Zone/ Historical A-Horizon (Top Soil)

k

E4

E2

E3

E1

11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4

21

20

meters

22

11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4

East West

21

20

22

bioturbated

root

root

bioturbated

bioturbated

bioturbated

bioturbated

bioturbated

bioturbated

bioturbated

bioturbated

Mixed & 

sheared

materials

Mixed & 

sheared

materials

bioturbated

bioturbated

bioturbated

u100

u110

u80

u90

u50

u60

u20/30

u10

u40

u70

Plow Zone/ Historical A-Horizon (Top Soil)

k

E4

E2

E3

E1

E3

21

22

20

21

22

20

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

meters

West East

TRENCH N3 NORTH WALL

TRENCH N3 SOUTH WALL

n3-5

n3-4

n3-1

n3-2

n3-3

bioturbated

bioturbated

bioturbated bioturbated

bioturbated

bioturbated

bioturbated

channel fill

bioturbated

Mixed & 

sheared

materials

Mixed & 

sheared

materials

bioturbated

bioturbated

u100

u110

u80 u90

u50

u60

u20/30

u10

u40

u70

Plow Zone/ Historical A-Horizon (Top Soil)

k

E4

E2

E3

E1

E3

TRENCH N2 SOUTH WALL

11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

meters

21

20

22

11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

East West

21

20

22

? ? ?

?

?

u100

u110

u80

u90

u50

u60

u30

u20

u10

u40

u70

Plow Zone/ Historical A-Horizon (Top Soil)

Surface-rupture moletrack

Sand-filled

shears

? ?

k k k k k k k

E4

E2

E3

E1

E3

k

21

22

21

22

20

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

meters

20

West East

TRENCH N2 NORTH WALL

n2-1

n2-2

Mixed blocks& 

sheared u30 & u 40 Mixed blocks& 

sheared u30 & u 40

bioturbated

?

k

k k k k k k

Sandfilled

crack 

or shear

Sandfilled

crack or

 shear

u100

u110

u80

u90

u50

u60

u20/30

u10

u40

u70

Plow Zone/ Historical A-Horizon (Top Soil)

Plow Zone/ Historical A-Horizon (Top Soil)

E4

E2

E3

E1

E3

This map was printed on an electronic plotter directly from digital files. Dimensional calibration may vary between electronic plotters and

between X and Y directions on the same plotter, and paper may change size due to atmospheric conditions; therefore, scale and

proportions may not be true on plots of this map.

For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services, Box 25286, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, 1-888-ASK-USGS

Available on World Wide Web at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1011/ 

Any use of trade, firm, or product names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.

Government

Manuscript approved for publication January 13, 2012

1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FEET

1 .5 0 1 METER

Logs and Data from Trenches Across and Near the Green Valley Fault 

 at the Mason Road Site, Fairfield, Solano County, California, 2006-2009

By

James J. Lienkaemper, Robert R. Sickler, Shannon A. Mahan, Johnathan Brown, Liam M. Reidy, and Mindy A. Kimball

2012

Open-File Report 2012-1011

Sheet 2 of 5

Pamphlet accompanies map

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1082
In Re: CARL R. BROOKS, JR., Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-94-590) Submitted: January 31, 1997 Decided: February 21, 1997 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl R. Brooks, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Carl Brooks filed this mandamus petition seeking to challenge this court's decision in Brooks v. Southeastern Public Service Authority , No. 95-2260 (4th Cir. Jan. 7, 1997) (unpublished) (per curiam). Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and may be granted only when there are no other means by which the petitioner could obtain the requested relief. See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Further, mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4thCir. 1979). Because this case presents no extraordinary circumstances, and because mandamus is not the proper remedy for challenging a prior decision of this court, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
2003 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

7-22-2003

USA v. Swinton

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 01-1004

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Swinton" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 354.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/354
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 01-1004

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ANDRE SWINTON,

 Appellant

 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 94-cr-00008-1)

District Judge: Hon. Harvey Bartle, III

 

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

December 19, 2002

Before: SLOVITER, McKEE, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges

(Opinion Filed June 23, 2003)

___________________________________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

___________________________________

The slip opinion in the above case is hereby amended as follows:

1. On page 28, line 2, change “Clark” to “Parker.”

BY THE COURT:

/s/Max Rosenn

 

Circuit Judge

Dated:July 18, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26824]



[[Page 52796]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Proposed Collection; Comment Request For Reclearance of an 
Information Collection: Standard Form 2808

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management intends to submit to the Office of Management and 
Budget a request for reclearance of an information collection. Standard 
Form 2808, Designation of Beneficiary (CSRS), is used by persons 
covered under the Civil Service Retirement System to designate a 
beneficiary to receive the lump sum payment due from the Civil Service 
Retirement and Disability Fund in the event of their death.
    Approximately 2,000 SF 2808 forms are completed annually. We 
estimate it takes approximately 15 minutes to complete the form. The 
annual burden is 500 hours.
    Comments are particularly invited on:

--whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of functions of the Office of Personnel Management, and 
whether it will have practical utility;
--whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection is 
accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and
--ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on those who are to respond, through use of the appropriate 
technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f2989f949380809d9cb29d829fdc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b51565d5a494954557b544b56155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before 
December 8, 1997.

ADDRESS: Send or deliver comments to--Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, 
Operations Support Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, U.S. 
Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 3349, 
Washington, DC 20415.
FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION CONTACT: Mary 
Beth Smith-Toomey, Management Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 97-26824 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

Brunner, Christine

From: Sargeant, Kathryn

Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 5:06 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad

Subject: EPA Response to EO 12866 Comments on Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86)

Attachments: EPA_Response_EO_12866_ Tier 3_Final_Rule_Summary_Comments_2_13_2014.docx; 

Ferrari Tier III Letter from David Wertheim to William Charmley - includ....pdf; Meetings with 

Chrysler. Tier 3 NPRM Lead Time and ABT.PDF; Alliance&GAM Credit Life Comment.pdf

Attached are EPA’s responses to the summary comments that you sent on February 13. (Note that yesterday I sent you 

EPA’s response to the other comments from February 13.) Also attached are a few documents that are referenced in 

our responses. 

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 1:45 AM 

To: Sargeant, Kathryn 

Subject: EO 12866 Comments on Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86) 

Kathryn, 

 Attached are some of the EO 12866 comments on the Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86). 

Regards, 

Chad
#### MILLER AUTO BROKER & LEASING CO., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. FIRST AMERICAN BANK OF NORTH PALM BEACH, a Florida State Bank, Florida Water & Utilities, Inc., a Florida corporation, and First Florida Utilities, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary, a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-661.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 4, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Hugh .MacMillan, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
  (a)
    
    A review of the Servicers activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing
agreement during the period from August 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009 has been made under my
supervision.
 (b)
    
    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the
aforementioned period.
  /s/ Daniel J. GardettoDaniel J. GardettoAssistant Treasurer of
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC,
as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner
Trust 2009-D