alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 9, 2011 

1 of 2 

Proposed EPA Ruling 

Electric Generating Units (“EGU”) 

Maximum Available Control Technology (“MACT”) 

Questions for Consideration 

EPA/HECO June 13, 2011 Conference Call 

1. Would the EPA consider a Capacity Factor (“CF”) criterion to determine a 

generating unit’s applicability to EGU MACT? 

For example, if a generating unit has an annual CF of 25% or less, then it would 

be not be subject to EGU MACT. 

a. If such a CF criterion were plausible as noted in Question 1, then could 

this 25% limit be temporarily exceeded during years where Scrubbers 

and/or Electrostatic Precipitators (“ESP”) were being installed on other 

units to meet EGU MACT compliance? 

The rationale for this temporary CF excursion is to ensure that sufficient 

generation is available to allow other generating units to be taken offline 

to install the environmental controls for EGU MACT compliance. As 

discussed previously, the island of Oahu’s isolation limits Hawaiian 

Electric to take only two generating off line simultaneously, without 

significantly impacting system reliability. 

2. In the context of a non-continental subcategory, would the EPA consider a 

separate set of Hazardous Air Pollutant (“HAP”) emission limits for island 

utilities? In other words, would the EPA consider establishing a non-continental 

residual oil MACT floor based on test data from island utilities only (i.e. Hawaii, 

Puerto Rico, Guam, etc.)? 

3. Would EPA consider a “transitional” subcategory for generating units planned for 

near-term retirement? In other words, if generating units were planned for nearterm retirement but outside of the 3 year EGU MACT compliance timeframe, 

would the EPA consider establishing less stringent HAP emission limits to allow 

these planned retired units to remain in operation past the EGU MACT 

compliance deadline provided they meet the “transitional” subcategory emission 

limits? 
June 9, 2011 

2 of 2 

4. Would the EPA consider a “transitional” subcategory for generating units planned 

to be converted to biofuel? In other words, if generating units are planned for 

near-term conversion to biofuel, but outside of the 3 year EGU MACT 

compliance timeframe, would the EPA consider establishing less stringent HAP 

emission limits to allow these future biofuel units to remain in operation past the 

EGU MACT compliance deadline provided they meet the “transitional” 

subcategory emission limits? 

a. If a “transitional” subcategory is plausible, would the EPA consider “timephased” HAP emission limits for different biofuel/residual oil blends, 

where the limits would become increasingly more stringent over time? 

For example: 

 

2016 HAP emission limits: 10% biofuel/90% residual oil 

2018 HAP emission limits: 30% biofuel/70% residual oil 

2020 HAP emission limits: 50% biofuel/50% residual oil 

2022 HAP emission limits: 70% biofuel/30% residual oil 

5. In the context of non-continental subcategory, would the EPA change the fuel 

blend percentage from 10% residual oil to 30% residual oil for determining 

classification of an EGU?
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dominos, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 19, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Brandon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on
my knowledge:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. BrandonDavid A. BrandonChief Executive Officer




Dated: August 3, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dominos, Inc. and will be retained by
Dominos, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 18, 2021

No. 04-21-00318-CV

Maria BENAVIDES,

Appellant

v.

WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE OF MFRA TRUST 

2014-2,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CV00782

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due on October 13, 2021. Neither the brief nor a motion for 

extension of time has been filed. We therefore ORDER appellant to file, by November 2, 2021: 

1. her brief; and 

2. a written response reasonably explaining: (a) her failure to timely file a brief; 

and (b) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to 

timely file a brief.

If appellant fails to timely file a brief and the written response, we will dismiss the appeal 

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court order).

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of October, 2021.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 1:26 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: RE: OMB/OSTP Discussion on State Goals Spreadsheet 

Hi Bob, 

The WHCC isn’t free at that time – so we’ll be in NEOB 10103. Let me know if there’s anyone 

additional from the 9:30 meeting that will be in this one – I’ll need their clearance information. 

Otherwise, I’ll clear everyone from the 9:30 meeting in for the noon meeting. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 12:55 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj; Higgins, Cortney; Culligan, Kevin; Tsirigotis, Peter; Harvey, Reid; 

Stenhouse, Jeb; Hutson, Nick; Hoffman, Howard; Lifland, David; Eschmann, Erich; Adamantiades, 

Mikhail; Johnson, Mary; King, Melanie; Fellner, Christian; Johnson, Tanya; Conner, Lisa 

Subject: OMB/OSTP Discussion on State Goals Spreadsheet 

When: Friday, May 09, 2014 12:00 PM-1:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). 

Where: WHCC (room TBD), (call-in: 1-866-299-3188, passcode: 919-541-5536) 

 

 

The purpose of this meeting is to discuss EPA’s State Goals Spreadsheet with OSTP and OMB. 

This meeting will be a face-to-face meeting over at the White House Conference Center (726 

Jackson Place, just east of the NEOB) and Cortney will provide the exact room location at a later 

time. I have also provided a call-in number for those who choose to participate by phone. 

 

EPA – If you are planning to attend this meeting in person, please see provide me your name (no 

further into needed for the WHCC) by COB Tuesday, May 6 so that I can get you included on the 

attendees list.
Order entered December 28, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01161-CV

No. 05-18-01162-CV

No. 05-18-01163-CV

No. 05-18-01164-CV

No. 05-18-01165-CV

No. 05-18-01166-CV

No. 05-18-01167-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.M., ET AL., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. DF-03-00170-R, DF-16-27206-R, DF-17-15414-R, 

DF-16-27181-U, DF-16-27204-U, DF-16-02192-U, and DF-10-13428-Y

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 27, 2018 motion for extension of time to file 

her brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or before January 15, 

2019.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
SEAN PARNELL,GOVERNOR 410 Willoughby Avenue,Suite303 P.O.Box111800 Juneau,AK99811-1800 PHONE: (907)465-5100 FAX: (907)465-5129 http://www.dec.state.ak.us CERTIFIED MAIL: 7009 3410 0000 1377 3155 Return Receipt Requested March 23, 2012 Keith Rose EPA Region
10 Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics (AWT- 107) 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101 Attention Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-201 1-0367 Dear Dr. Rose, The Alaska Department

of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) Division of Air Quality thanks the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for this opportunity

tocomment
onthe proposed approval of Alaska’s Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (RH SIP), published

in the Federal Register on February 24, 2012 (77 Federal Register 11022). The proposed action addresses RH SIP requirements including calculation
of baseline and natural visibility conditions,

astatewide inventory of visibility-impairing pollutants, best available retrofit technology (BART), Reasonable Progress Goals (RPGs), and Long-Term Strategy (LTS). EPA is also proposing

to approveADEC’s BART regulations

atIS AAC 50.260. ADEC appreciates EPA’s thorough review of ourRH SIP and supportsEPA’s action to approvethe plan. We encourageEPA tofinalize its approval of the SIP as meeting the requirements

of the Clean Air Act, Sections

1 69A and

I 69B, and Federal Regulations

40 C.F.R. 51.308. Please feel free to contactmeif you require anyadditional information

asEPA considers
its final action onthis SIP. Sincerely, Alice Edwards Directcr:DiviiowofAiiQualit7 Larry Hartig/ADEC Commissioner Lynn Kent/ADEC Deputy Commissioner John Kuterbach/ADEC
APP Mgr. STATE OF AIIAS DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY DIRECTORS OFFICE CONSERVATION/ (luin Air
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
January 2, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Varian, Inc.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 11, 2009                              
|                                                      
|/s/ GARRY W. ROGERSON                                 
|Garry W. Rogerson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COASTAL
CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.
 
 FORM
10-Q


EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. (the "Company") on FORM 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Phillip W. Ware, Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.






Date:  August
      19, 2009
              By
              /s/
      Phillip W. WarePhillip
      W. Ware
                Principal
      Executive Officer,
                President
      and Principal Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and will be retained by Coastal
Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
November 26, 2013

No. 04-13-00757-CV

MICHAEL TATSCH,

Appellant

V.

CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC AND INFINITY COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

Appellees

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12977

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER

After reviewing the parties' addendums to the Civil Docketing Statement in the abovenumbered and styled appeal, this court has determined that this dispute is appropriate for referral

to an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) procedure. See Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Codi154.021 (Vernon 2005). All further communications with this court by the parties regarding

ADR shall be directed to the Clerk of the Court for any assistance in the mediation process.

All parties are ORDERED to respond in writing by December 13, 2013, stating: (1) the

name, address, and fee schedule of the mediator of their choice; or (2) that they cannot agree on

mediator, in which case the court will appoint one; or (3) any objection to mediation and the

reasons for such objection. See id. 154.022 (b).

Provided the parties submit to mediation, this court will issue an order suspending all

appellate deadlines for forty-five (45) days in order that the parties may concentrate on the

scheduling and completion of the mediation process.

Is it so ORDERED on November 26, 2013.

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

iwlEREOF, have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

26] 20f 3.

ottle, Clerk"
<PAGE>  82



                                                                EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Coachmen Industries,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I,
Claire C. Skinner, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period(s) covered in the Report.


                           By: /S/ CLAIRE C. SKINNER
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Claire C. Skinner
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



Date:  August 14, 2002
<Page>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.11b

                                    AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                                 TRIBUNE COMPANY
                        1997 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Company hereby amends the Tribune
Company 1997 Incentive Compensation Plan by adding the following new
subparagraph (f) to Article IV:

      (f)   any shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance and not used under
   the Company's 1992 Long-Term Incentive Plan and The Times Mirror Company 1996
   Management Incentive Plan.

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Company is
hereby authorized and empowered to take all steps necessary to effect the
foregoing resolution, including the execution, filing and delivery of such
documents as may be required by law or as may be deemed necessary or proper in
connection with the matters set forth in these resolutions.

                                  *   *   *

I, Mark W. Hianik, Assistant Secretary for Tribune Company, hereby certify that
the foregoing is a correct copy of resolutions duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of Tribune Company on May 7, 2002.


                                                        /s/ Mark W. Hianik
                                                        ------------------
                                                            Mark W. Hianik
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                CERTIFICATION


I, Garrett Sullivan certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cognitronics
Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
   that material information relating to the registrant,
   including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
   by others within those entities, particularly during the
   period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
   controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
   the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation
   Date"); and
   c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
   the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
   based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):
   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
   internal controls which could adversely affect the
   registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
   financial data and have identified for the registrant's
   auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
   management or other employees who have a significant role in
   the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: November 14, 2003



/s/ Garrett Sullivan
Garrett Sullivan
Chief Financial Officer
# Dividends

Page &P of &N

# Footnotes

# Missed Payments
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 219 / Thursday, November 13, 1997 / Notices 60877

Editorial Note: FR Doc. 97–28687 which

was originally published in the issue of

Thursday, October 30, 1997 at page 58709 is

being republished in its entirety because of

editorial errors.

[FR Doc. 97–28687 Filed 10–29–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505–01–C

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 97–28]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification;

Republication

Editorial Note: FR Doc. 97–28688 which

was originally published in the issue of

Thursday, October 30, 1997, on page 58709

is being republished in its entirety because of

editorial errors.

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense

Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104–

164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/CPD, (703)

604–6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 97–28,

with attached transmittal, policy

justification, and sensitivity of

technology.

Dated: October 24, 1997.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–M
60878 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 219 / Thursday, November 13, 1997 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 219 / Thursday, November 13, 1997 / Notices 60879
60880 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 219 / Thursday, November 13, 1997 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 219 / Thursday, November 13, 1997 / Notices 60881

Editorial Note: FR Doc. 97–28688 which

was originally published in the issue of

Thursday, October 30, 1997, on page 58709 is being republished in its entirety because of

editorial errors.

[FR Doc. 97–28688 Filed 10–29–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505–01–C
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 131874 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 131874 COA: 260311 Oakland CC: 2004-198351-FC LAWRENCE ROY DUCKETT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
#### Raphael LAYNE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-791.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 7, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.