ñ5- f^^-^ Agriculture Handbook No. 257

,'ZU s DEPT. OF AGRICUI-TURE

CURRENT SWiAw RtCOaOS

ROLLER

GINNING

S^AmericanEgyptian

K Cotton

in the Southwest

Agricultural Research Service

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Contents

Page

Problems in Ginning American-Egyptian Cottons . 2

The Modern Roller Ginning Plant 4

Operation of the McCarthy-type Roller Gin Stand 6

Cleaning Pima Seed Cotton 9

Testing Procedures 12

Hand-picked Undefoliated Cotton 13

Machine-picked Undefoliated Cotton 14

Drying Pima Seed Cotton 19

Static Electricity in Roller Ginning 20

Pneumatic Conveying and Cleaning of Pima Lint 23

Saw Ginning Pima Cotton 27

Summary 28

Literature Cited 29

Appendix 31

Fans and Piping 31

Gin Roller Covering 40

Seed Cotton Reclaimers 43

Mill-type Lint Opener-cleaners 44

Washington, D.C. Issued January 1964

n
Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment is made of the helpful assistance given the author

by his fellow workers in assembling this handbook. Special acknowledgment is made to Messrs. Charles A. Bennett, deceased, and Wilbur

M. Hurst, retired, of the Cotton Ginning Investigations of AES, for

their assistance and suggestions.

in
ROLLER GINNING

American-Egyptian Cotton

in the Southwest

BY DAVID M. ALBERSON and VICTOR L. STEDRONSKY, agricultural engineers, Agricultural Engineering Research Division, Agricultural Research Service *

Since 1950, cleaners, driers, extractors, and pneumatic conveyances

have become increasingly important in ginning American-Egyptian

cotton grown in the Southwest. Modern harvesting practices and the

high price and shortage of labor have necessitated a change in ginning

practices on extra long staple cotton. Each year the seed cotton has

been arriving at the gin with more foreign matter and a higher

moisture content.

Production of American-Egyptian cotton in the United States since

1950 has ranged from a high of 93,500 bales in 1952 to a low of 49,100

bales in 1956 (lo),^ In 1958, 81,900 bales were produced and in

1959, 69,100. The entire American-Egyptian cotton crop is grown

in the Salt Kiver Valley of Arizona, in New Mexico, and in District 6

of Texas.

This handbook contains available research data on the eflFects of

cleaning, extracting, drying, and pneumatic handling on AmericanEgyptian cottons grown in the United States. Before 1950, this type

of cotton had been ginned with less cleaning and handling by machinery than upland cotton, which requires more careful picking,

roller ginning, and packaging.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture conducted limited research

between 1926-41 on roller ginning. World War II halted the work

and it was not resumed until 1950. Small-scale experiments were conducted by the Southwestern Cotton Ginning Research Laboratory at

Mesilla Park, N. Mex., during the harvesting seasons of 1950, 1951,

and 1952. Intensive investigations were started there in 1953 after

facilities for roller ginning research were installed. Representative

experiments and their results are reported in this handbook. Additional engineering data and some recent commercial developments are

given in the appendix.

^ Headquarters : Southwestern Cotton Ginning Research Laboratory, Mesilla

Park, N. Mex.

^ Italic numbers in parentheses refer to Literature Cited, p. 29.

1
PROBLEMS IN GINNING AMERICAN-EGYPTIAN COTTON

American-Egyptian cotton was first produced commercially in the

Southwest in 1911 after discovery of a variety that became known as

"Yuma." This variety was grown in the Imperial Valley of California and the Salt Eiver Valley of Arizona until 1917 Production

rose from 30 bales in 1911 to 15,966 bales in 1917 (7).

Yuma cotton had a staple length of approximately 1%6 inches

{16), was very fine, and could not be ginned satisfactorily on a saw

gin. Consequently, to retain the qualities required for spinning, Yuma

had to be roller ginned and handled by methods similar to those used

for sea-island cotton, which had formerly been grown in the Southeast for the high-quality cotton market {11). Bennett {3) has reviewed the history of American-Egyptian cotton in the Southwest

and the development of machinery to gin this type of cotton.

With the coming of the boll weevil in the southern cotton States,

production of sea-island cotton practically ceased. Many roller gins

thus found their way to the Southwest for use in ginning the new longstaple varieties of cotton. Roller ginning at that time usually consisted of a simple cleaner feeder with a spiked draper belt that carried

a small amount of very clean hand-picked seed cotton to the gin roller

{10). If the cotton was trashy, it was usually passed through a

3-cylinder picker-roller cleaner and an inclined shaker before being

fed to the roller gin.

The early roller gin mechanism, known as a McCarthy-type gin

stand, consisted of a roller, a stationary knife, a moving knife connected to a crank by means of crank legs (connecting rods), a set of

seed grids, a pusher board, and a doffer. A roller gin of this type is

shown in figure 1.

BN 1840r,

FIGURE 1.—McCarthy-type roller gin stand with plain bearings, forged cranlîs

and wooden crank legs, brush doiïer, and a spiral-wound packing-covered

roller with leather moting strips.
In 1918, Yuma cotton was replaced commercially by "Pima," which

had been discovered as a single plant in a field of Yuma at the U.S.

Cotton Field Station, Sacaton, Ariz., in 1910. From 1918 to 1939,

Pima or Pima crosses were the only varieties of American-Egyptian

cotton grown. More than 92,000 bales of Pima were produced m 1920.

Because of unstable production, gin owners were reluctant to make

expenditures on roller gin improvements. However, from 1930 to

1940 some ginners made individual mechanical changes and improvements to the older McCarthy-type gin stands. Plain bearings were

replaced with ball or roller bearings, gin frames were made more

sturdy, and an effort was made to improve mechanical dependability

and to achieve more continuous operation.

Production increased substantially in 1941 and 1942. As old equipment wore out and no other old gin stands were available for replacement, for the first time in several decades new roller gins were manufactured. American gin machinery manufacturers installed many

new gin stands to handle and gin almost 74,000 bales in 1942 and

almost 60,000 bales in 1943. But in 1944 the number of bales ginned

dropped to 8,600. From 1944 to 1949 the industry was again almost

dormant and many gins were idle. During those 6 years, an average of

only 3,950 bales was produced annually.

In 1950 production again skyrocketed to 62,200 bales. Acreage in

Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas increased greatly, and new ginning

plants were constructed in the Salt River Valley of Arizona, in the

Mesilla Valley of New Mexico, and in the El Paso Valley and near

Pecos, Texas. Production reached an all-time high of 93,500 bales

in 1952, only to drop to 64,500 in 1953. In 1954 and 1955 production

again dropped to an estimated 40,000 bales annually but increased to

49,100 bales in 1956. In 1957,79,700 bales were grown ; in 1958,81,900 ;

in 1959,69,100 ; and in 1960 only 60,000 {16).

It was believed for years that long, fine-fibered Pima cotton must

be handled very gently and that ginning was a very delicate operation.

Farniers took great care in harvesting clean, hand-picked cotton, and

the ginners avoided unnecessary handling. In some cases one or two

overhead unit extractor cleaners were added to the 4-cylinder cleaner,

all of which received the seed cotton from the wagon suction telescope.

After it passed through the separator or dropper and received limited

cleaning, the cotton accumulated on the second floor and was then

manually pushed to chutes and delivered by gravity to the gin stands

beneath. Plants ranged in size from 12 to 36 stands. As the stands

ginned the cotton, the lint fell to the floor and was manually pushed

to a single-box press for baling.

The gins manufactured in 1942 were modern designs of sturdy steel

or cast iron—a marked improvement over the old equipment. Ball and

roller bearings or improved lubrication elements made continuous

operation more dependable. Eoller and crank speeds were increased

to 125 and 900 r.p.m., respectively. However, as the old principles of

operation were unchanged, the new gins had only slightly more

hourly capacity than the old ones. The new gins were two sizes. One

company manufactured a 40-inch roller whereas another increased the

length to 54 inches. New roller ginning plants erected in 1942 followed

the old pattern of building construction, generally two stories. The

gins were on the ground floor, and a separator or pneumatic dropper

and usually a 4-cyclinder cleaner Avere installed on the second floor.
In 1952 several new ginning establishments were erected in Arizona,

New Mexico, and Texas. One company increased roller length to 60

inches but retained other mechanical features similar to the 54-inch

1942 models. But in 1950 there was a marked change in the building

construction of roller ginning plants.

THE MODERN ROLLER GINNING PLANT

Since 1950 the roller ginning plants constructed in the Southwest

have included many of the latest design features, similar arrangements

of machinery, and the modern equipment used in modem saw gins.

The old two-story wooden or brick building has given way to singlefloor or li/^-story prefabricated all-steel structures. Installation of

the machinery at ground level is convenient for arrangement, change,

and maintenance.

Overhead shafts for gin drives have been largely replaced by individual motors at each gin stand. Lint-conveyor belts carry the

cotton to an air nozzle pickup and thence to a condenser and a doublebox press. Latest types of seed-cotton cleaning and extracting machinery and drying equipment are being used, and each gin stand is fed

by a unit feeder cfeaner. Pneumatic seed-cotton conveyance and conventional screw-type augers have jointly replaced manual handling.

Many other practices followed in a modern upland-type saw-gin

plant are followed in the ginning of American-Egyptian cotton varieties. Piping, air-flow, storage, and seed and trash handling requirements are similar to those that have been reported for saw gins {H).

Research on the ginning of American-Egyptian cotton until 1950

had been limited (5,10,11,12). The USDA Cotton Ginning Research

Laboratory at Stoneville, Miss., was faced with many research probBX 18406

B^GtjRB 2.—Pneumatic lint-handling system installed in a commercial gin at

Casa Grande, Ariz., in 1943.
BN 18399, BN 18402

FIGURE 3.—Roller gin research facilities at the Southwestern Cotton Ginning

Research Laboratory, Mesilla Park, N. Mex. : A, exterior view ; B, interior new.

lems on upland cottons and could devote little effort to roller ginning, and then only when the need was greatest. Some ginning tests

were performed by the Laboratory staff at Sacaton, Ariz., m 1932,1936,

and then again in 1940-43. As a result of these tests the USDA Cotton

Ginning Research Laboratory developed a satisfactory pneumatic

lint-handling system and one was installed in a commercial gm at Casa

Grande, Ariz., in 1943 (fig. 2). The Laboratory also developed an

improved doffer, a static eliminator, and other improvements that have

been incorporated in modern roller gin stands and plants.

705-424 0—64-
The Southwestern Cotton Ginning Research Laboratory at Mesilla

Park, N. Mex., began roller ginning tests on a limited scale in 1950.

In 1953, a roller ginning laboratory building was erected (fig. 3, J.).

It is fully equipped with drying, overhead cleaning, and extracting

equipment plus a belt-pneumatic lint-handling system, double-box

press, and most of the late-model roller gins. Thus, for the first time,

facilities and working space were available to start a complete research program on roller ginning of American-Egyptian cotton (fig.

S^ B), Also, for the first time, Imt-cleaning devices w^ere operated in

conjunction with roller gins. This research was prompted by producers of long-staple cotton, who were being forced to harvest their

crops mechanically because of high labor costs. In so doing, unsatisfactory grades were being produced in the existing gins.

OPERATION OF THE McCARTHY-TYPE ROLLER GIN STAND

Figure 1 shows a typical McCarthy-type roller gin with plain bearings, forged cranks, and wooden crank legs. This rather crude construction has not been conducive to continuous operation because constant adjustments and repairs are required. Such gins have operated

with roller speeds of approximately 100 r.p.m. and crank speeds of

600 r.p.m. Ginning capacity has been relatively low in the United

States—from 1 to li/^ pounds of lint per hour per inch of roller

length.

The operation and gin settings of the 1950 model of the McCarthytype roller gin stand are approximately the same as those of models

built up to 1942. The greatest difference is that on the 1950 model

these settings are easier to make and maintain. Bearings, eccentrics, and general gin construction have been improved. However,

the settings and adjustments of roller gins vary greatly. Some settings and adjustments are based on experience accumulated over years

of operating both the old model roller gins and the present gin stands.

Others are purely theoretical and are based on engineering knowledge

alone. The ultimate goal is the ginning of the greatest amount of cotton without undue wear on the gin, while retaining the highest possible

fiber quality. Thus the proper setting or adjustment of a roller gin

is based on a combination of experience, common sense, and application of basic or established engineering knowledge.

The following comments are not intended to be the set rule for

roller gin adjustment, but rather a guide for "setting up" a roller

gin stand. Final adjustments or settings will be determined by the

operator after the gin is "broken in," and will depend on the characteristics of the cotton he is ginning and the optimum capacity he is

able to obtain by the proper relation between the various settings.

Figure 4 is a cross-sectional view of the important parts of the McCarthy-type roller gin. The settings of the roller gin are the relation

of these parts to one another.

The stationary steel knife B (fig. 4) is about 4 inches wide and from

Vs to 1/4 inch thick. Its thickness varies considerably because some

ginners prefer a thin knife whereas others use the thicker Vi-inch

knife. As a general rule the 40-inch gin stands are equipped with a

l^- or 3/16-inch knife and the 54- or 60-inch gin stands with a 3/16-

or 14-inch knife.

The knife should be held tightly against roller A at a pressure

ranging from 20 to 30 pounds per running inch, depending on the
— -o:o^

Diogrom A

Diagram B DioQram C

FIGURE 4.—Conventional features of McCarthy-type roller gin stands, models,

1917 to 1950. DIAGRAM A, typical cross section of upper portion of the unit

showing A, ginning roller; B, stationary knife; C, moving knife; D, crank leg:

£/, cranks and crankshaft ; F, pivot for moving knife ; O, pusher board ; and H,

seed grid. DIAGRAM B, ginning roller, A, and stationary brush doffer, /. DIAGRAM C, ginning roller, A, and USDA-improved rotary doffer, J.

covering material. The working or bottom edge of the knife should

be on or slightly below the center line of the roller. The stationary

knife must be so clamped that its ginning edge is in the same plane as

the axis of the roller; when set in this manner and when the ginning

roller pressure is applied, the moving knife may be adjusted to the

proper setting without digging into the roller. The stationary knife
setting is one of the first checks that should be made when setting up

the roller gin.

The ginning roller Ä (fig. 4) consists of a cylindrical wooden core

on a steel shaft. It is thickly covered by some material that has an

affinity to cotton fiber, such as leather or special composition packing.

Since about 1938, walrus hide and other leathers have been very expensive in the United States. A substitute for leather—an American

waterpump packing made from laminations of canvas and rubber—

is being used satisfactorily for roller covering.

The pressure of the ginning roller Ä against the stationary knife B

is of primary importance in roller gin operation. The proper pressure will finally be determined by ginning performance, but basic rules

enable the operator to achieve these results with a minimum number

of changes after ginning begins.

The ginning roller should have enough pressure so that the surface

of the roller will feel uniformly warm from one end to the other

when the roller has been operating a few moments. After the roller

has run a few hours, or is "broken in," a pressure mark is usually left

on the roller by the stationary knife.

If the pressure is correct, a streak approximately % to 7/16 inch

wide will show on the roller where the roller and stationary knife

made contact. This streak should be uniform in width from one end

of the roller to the other.

If the pressure is not correct, the roller will heat while running

and the packing will burn or the impression will be too deep or irregular. The roller surface should never be allow^ed to become so

hot as to burn your hand. Also, too much pressure between the roller

and the stationary knife will result in excessive wear on the covering.

Too little pressure will result in the roller not having sufficient grip or

hold on the cotton while the moving knife strips the seed from the

fiber. Evidence of this would be shown when the lint seemingly

quivers momentarily at the ginning point before it is released and

flows over the roller. Also, a cool roller shows that there is not enough

pressure between the roller and the stationary knife.

The pressure must be readjusted as the roller covering wears down.

Care must be taken while adjusting the pressure not to push the stationary knife into the moving knife. After any adjustment, turn the

machine over by hand before starting it.

Adjustment of the moving knife O (fig. 4) consists of four major

settings :

(1) The moving knife must aline with the stationary knife so

that the two edges are parallel and properly spaced. The ginning

laboratory has found that face clearances between the moving and

stationary knives should range between 0.025 and 0.032 inch for

Pima cottons in the Southwest.

(2) Vertical adjustment of the moving knife—lengthening or

shortening the crank leg—must be such as to expose ample ginning

roller surface to the seed cotton.

(3) Horizontal adjustment of the moving knife—shortening or

lengthening the pivot arm—must provide proper clearance with the

fixed knife. This is necessary so that seeds cannot be lodged or

crushed on the ginning or return strokes of the moving knife.

(4) The overlap—the distance that the moving edges pass the

stationary edge—must suit the fiber length. This final adjustment
also is required for item (2). The correctness of these adjustments

can be best proved by the appearance of the lint cotton. A steady

and uniform flow of lint over the roller results if the adjustments

are correct.

On the question of overlap, a good rule of thumb is that the overlap

be approximately half the staple length of the cotton being ginned.

Here again, however, the appearance of the ginned lint will indicate

whether the overlap is excessive or insufficient. If the overlap is excessive, the lint tends to come off the roll in a rough, featherlike form

with very little semblance to a uniform layer. If the overlap is insufficient, the cotton will not clear the ginning point properly, an

indication that it is taking too many strokes of the moving knife to

complete the ginning of each seed. Correct overlap will yield a

smooth, even flow of lint over the ginning roller.

Adjustment of the seed grid is also important. The most satisfactory type of seed grid for ginning the varieties of cotton grown in

the Southwest is a comblike assembly of % by l^-inch fingers. These

fingers are 3 inches long, tapered to approximately 14 ^^^^ ^t the

finger tip, and spaced % inch on centers. This grid assembly allows

the semifuzzy seed of the Pima Si variety and the fuzzy seed of upland cotton to shed readily without loss of seed cotton. The grid

should be adjusted so that the clearance from the moving knife is as

great as can be obtained without dropping unginned seed cotton into

the seed. The tip of the fingers should be adjusted to allow for the

maximum exposure of the ginning roller when the moving knife is

at the beginning of its stroke. However, they should not strike the

moving blade adjustment bars.

The pusher board should be set so that in the forward position the

nose of the board will be from i/4 to 14 inch from the tips of the seed

fingers.

The setting of the doffing roller, while simple, does require some

attention. The center of the doffing roller should be from 2 to 3

inches below the center of the ginning roller shaft. The doffing

flights should then be set to just clear the ginning roller when turning. This setting allows the lint to be removed from the ginning roller smoothly without wadding or dropping the cotton between the

rollers. The speed of the doffing roller ranges from 30 to 50 r.p.m.,

depending on its diameter.

When a draper feeder (fig. 4, /) is used, the speed of the belt is

adjustable and should be set so that each flight of needled slats delivers only slightly more seed cotton to the ginning point than can be

ginned before the next slat delivers its seed cotton. The ginning laboratory has found thatthe draper feeder increases gin capacity.

CLEANING PIMA SEED COTTON

The Southwestern Cotton Ginning Research Laboratory at Mesilla

Park, N. Mex., conducted extensive research studies from 1950 through

1956 on cleaning two American-Egyptian varieties of seed cotton—

Pima 32 and Pima Si. The harvests were both hand picked and machine picked. A schedule of the cottons tested each season is given

in table 1. Numerous combinations of machinery were tested, ranging from a simple to a very elaborate combination. Schematic dia-
TABLE 1.—Pima cotton tested^ 1950-56

Year and variety Type of picking Picking season

1950: Pima 32 Hand íEarly.

IMidseason.

ÍMidseason.

ILate.

ÍMidseason.

ILate.

Late.

1951: Pima 32 do

1952: Pima 32 do

1953:

Pima 32 Machine

Pima SI do Do

1954: ÍHand.__ Midseason.

Pima 32 do

Machine

Late.

Do.

Pima SI /Hand Midseason.

IMachine Late.

1955:

Pima 32 Machine ÍMidseason.

[Late.

/Midseason.

ILate.

Midseason

Pima SI do

1956: Pima SI do

grams of the seed cotton cleaning machinery for roller and saw ginning at the laboratory are shown in figure 5. Figure 6 shows additional machinery for use only in roller ginning.

Every possible combination of machinery in these two diagrams has

been tested in cleaning Pima seed cotton, but for simplicity three have

been selected for discussion: (1) Simple (fig. 7), (2) moderate (fi^.

8),and (3) elaborate (fig. 9).

Separator

FIGURE 5.—Diagram of drying, cleaning, and extracting equipment, available

by piping and valves, for roller ginning at the Southwestern Cotton Ginning

Research Laboratory, Mesilla Park, N. Mex.

10
From V« agon sr^^/ ^Separator

s:^

y^^ ^^3.—__/ \ Separator

/Valve

^"^

^

Xf Pima \

—1 unit yl

Drier

p

1

\ Bypass i

\

Pickup *"

Extractor ^

feeder /

^ Distributors.

1 r

^

Al Roller Gin 1 t

J

1 ^ ^"^l ^

Lint belt [tj|

FIGURE 6.—Diagram of additional equipment in the roller ginning laboratory.

From wagon

Drier

Separator

Distributor

Roller Gi

stand ^^1

Lint beit^j

FiGUEE 7.—Simple machinery combination for roller ginning research tests.

n
From wogon

SeporatorV^-,^"^ w

FIGURE 8.—Moderate machinery combination for roller ginning research tests.

From wagon or overflow

FIGURE 9.—Elaborate machinery combination for roller ginning research tests.

Testing Procedures

The seed cottons were obtained from growers in the upper Rio

Grande Valley of New Mexico, District 6 of Texas, and the Salt River

Valley of Arizona. When the cotton reached the laboratory, it was

composited by hand turning and mixing to obtain homogeneity of

both foreign matter and moisture content. The seed cotton was then

weighed into 150-pound lots and fed through the various machinery

combinations being tested. Samples of seed cotton and lint were taken

at different points for determining foreign matter and moisture content, and for fiber analysis and spinning results. A description of

testing procedures has been published (J-^)-

The positions from which samples were taken and type of sample

for each lot are as follows :

(1) Foreign matter—seed cotton : AVagon and feeder apron.

12
(2) Moisture—seed cotton: Wagon and feeder apron.

(3) Moisture—lint: Before and after lint cleaning.

(4) Fiber classification—grade and staple: Before and after

lint cleaning.

(5) Fiber analyses—strength, upper half mean length, fineness,

maturity, uniformity, fiber nep count, fiber array : Before and after

lint cleaning.

(6) Shirley analyzer or nonlint content: Percentage of foreign

matter remaining in the ginned lint.

(7) Spinning results: Lint samples, before and after lint cleaning, were card web nep count, picker and card waste, yam strength,

yam appearance.

Hand-picked Undefoliated Cotton

The early picking of upland cotton occurs before the first picking

of Pima, which begins at midseason. Hand-picked Pima 82 and Pima

SI were tested from pickings made at times that correspond to the

upland midseason and late season pickings. Pima is usually picked

only twice instead of three times. The average results for the 4 years

during which these tests were made are shown in table 2.

TABLE 2.—Cleaning effects of machinery combinations on undefoliated

hand-picked Pima seed cotton^ 19S0S4.

Test item

Machinery combination

Simple Moderate Elaborate

Foreign matter:

Wagon sample percent. _

Feeder sample do

Nonlint content do

Moisture content:

Wagon sample do

Feeder sample do

Lint sample do

Lint turnout do

Grade designation, average grade

index

Staple length:

Inches

32ds of an inch

Midseason

l.S

.03

2.91

6.5

6.2

5.2

30.79

1. 7

IK

48

Late

season

3.5

.07

3.65

6.2

6.2

4.7

30.70

L3

47

Mid--

season

1.8

.03

2. 58

6.5

6.4

5tl

30.59

1.4

IK47. 6

Late

season

3,3

.05

3.45

6.2

6.1

4.7

30. 73

1.2

47.3

Midseason

1.8

.02

2. 71

ao

6.6

5. 1

30. 65

L2

iy2-

47. 6

Late

season

3.3

.03

3.21

6.2

a 1

4.5

30.74

1. 2

m47. 8

The results show that there were only small improvements from

the simple to the elaborate seed cotton cleaning combination on handpicked cottons. The moderate combination (12 to 13 cylinders of

cleaning and an extractor feeder) resulted in the same grade as the

elaborate combination ( 18 cylinders of cleaning, a bulk extractor, and

extractor feeders). There were no differences in the staples or percentage of lint turnouts.

705-424 O—64- 13
Machine-picked Undefoliated Cotton

Machine-picked Pima 32 and Pima Si from midseason and lateseason pickings were tested during the 4 years 1953-56. The cotton

varied greatly when it reached the laboratory. Moisture content and

foreign matter of the seed cotton varied with picking season, ability

of the picker operator, type of spindle the picker contained, and locality from which the test cotton was obtained. An average of the performance data for the test years is shown in table 3.

TABLE 3.—Gleaning effects of machinery combinations on undefoliated

machine-picked Pima seed cotton^ 1953-56

Test item

Foreign matter:

Wagon sample percent- _

Feeder sample do

Nonlint content do

Moisture content:

Wagon sample do

Feeder sample do

Lint sample do

Lint turnout " do

Grade designation, grade index

Staple length, 32ds of an inch

Machinery combination

Simple

season

5.2

L3

6.2

8.2

7.3

4. 9

30. 20

4. 2

45

Late

season

4. 9

1. 4

6. 2

9. 1

8. 4

5. 7

29. m

3. 6

45

Moderate Elaborate

Midseason

5. 8

LO

5.0

8.2

7.3

4. 8

29. 90

3.9

45

Late

season

4. 9

LO

6.0

9.3

8.4

5.3

29.26

3.6

45

Midseason

5.6

.9

4.0

8.3

7. 1

4. 6

29.60

3.4

45

Late

season

5. 1

. 7

5.0

9.0

7.8

4.8

29.43

3.2

45

Note. Because of excessive moisture in the seed cotton in 1955 and 1956

cleaning arrangements included moderate drying temperatures ranerinff from 160° to 200° F. ^ ^ ^ B ^

Table 3 shows that the first-picked (midseason) cotton steadily increased in grade without fiber damage and with only a slight decrease

in percentage of lint turnout as the cleaning machinery combination

was increased from simple to elaborate. The grades of late season

cotton increased slightly and then only when the elaborate combination was used. Percentage of lint turnout varied little from the

simple to the elaborate machinery combination. Other fiber qualities

were not materially affected by seed cotton cleaning equipment.

The conclusions drawn by the ginning laboratory from the research

tests on the seed cotton cleaning of American-Egyptian cotton are

as follows:

(1) Hand-picked cotton requires only a moderate cleaning machinery combination—from 12 to 13 cylinders of screen cleaning

and an extractor feeder—to obtain near maximum grades (fig. 8).

(2) Machine-picked cotton may be cleaned with an elaborate

cleaning machinery combination—up to 18 cylinders of cleaning, a

bur extractor, and extractor feeders—with a resulting increase in

grade and without affecting other fiber qualities. Moderate drying

of early or before-frost machine-picked cotton is desirable.

14
Cross-sectional flow figures of the cleaning equipment used in the

seed cotton cleaning tests made by the ginning laboratory on American-Egyptian cottons are shown in figures 10 through 14.

^,> 0«<3ù

FIGURE 10.—Super unit extractor feeder (courtesy of the John E. Mitchell Co.).

15
'^.:>;^%>1

FiGUBE H.—Convertible extractor feeder (courtesy of the John E. Mitchell Co.).

1«
FiouBE 12.—Bulk unit bur extractor (courtesy of the Continental Gin Co.).

17
FIGURE 13.—Inclined screen seed cotton cleaner (courtesy of the Continental

Gin Co.)-

18
FIGURE 14.—Inclined impact seed cotton cleaner (courtesy of the Continental

Gin Co.).

DRYING PIMA SEED COHON

Until machine pickers for harvesting American-Egyptian cottons

became prevalent, very little or no drying was needed in ginning

these varieties. Very few roller gin establishments were equipped

with driers until 1950. Roller gin plants constructed since 1950 have

included seed cotton driers and they have been used beneficially at

moderate temperatures without apparent fiber damage.

The Southwestern Cotton Ginning Research Laboratory conducted

a series of drying studies on Pima seed cotton from 1954 through

1956. Machine-picked seed cotton was used for these studies. Drying temperatures ranged from no heat to 300° F. The average results

are shown in table 4.

The average moisture content of the seed cotton as it arrived at the

gin ranged from 8.34 to 9.52 percent. The average moisture content

of the seed cotton at the feeder apron was reduced only from 7.92 to

7.02 percent when the maximum drying temperature of 300° F. was

used. In contrast, the moisture content of the lint was reduced from

an average of 5.33 to 3.21 percent by drying at the maximum temperature.

19
TABLE 4.—Effects of temperature on drying Pima seed cotton^ 195^-56

Test item

Drying temperature *

No

heat

150°

F.

180°

F.

200°

F.

220°

F.

240°

F.

300°

F.

Moisture content:

Wagon percentFeeder apron do

Lint do

Foreign matter:

Wagon do

Feeder apron do

Nonlint content do

Lint turnout do

Classers' grade designation. _

Staple length: ^2d inch

Upper half mean inches.

Picker and card waste

percent.

Average break factor

Average yarn appearance

8.56

7.92

5.33

4.37

.81

4.24

32. 15

3.6

46

1.34

12. 16

3, 165

108

8. 46

7.68

4.89

4. 19

.82

4.25

31. 41

3.4

46

1.34

11. 79

3,202

112

8.36

7.48

4. 44

4.20

.82

4.37

31.49

3.3

45

1.35

11.89

3, 199

112

8. 58

7.45

4. 16

4.83

.81

3.88

31.30

3.8

44

1.33

11.38

3, 132

118

8. 49

7. 27

4.00

4. 40

.88

3. 94

31. 59

3.5

46

1.34

11.61

3, 191

108

8.34

7.06

3.46

4.72

.70

3.60

31. 12

3.4

45

1. 32

11.22

3,097

122

9.52

7.02

3. 21

4. 44

. 60

3.70

31.35

3.5

45

1.34

10. 40

3,073

118

1 At drier inlet.

Percentage of foreign matter removed did not increase until the

temperature of the air entering the drier reached 200° to 240° F.

However, the percentage of lint turnout began to decrease immediately with addition of drying heat but did not substantially decrease

further at higher temperatures.

Grade and staple classifications varied little over the drying range,

and the upper half mean length as measured by the Fibrograph did

not indicate a shortening of the fiber. The spinning results from these

drying studies show^ a definite decrease in picker and card waste, and

general yarn appearance improved as drying temperatures were increased.

The conclusions from this series of drying studies are that when

drying seed cotton is necessary, moderate drying temperatures may be

employed without harmful effects and with an increase in cleaning

efficiency. However, the decrease in the percentage of lint turnout

and the possibility of fiber shortening necessitate the use of moderate temperatures—220°-240° F.—in the drier.

STATIC ELECTRICITY IN ROLLER GINNING

Static electricity is a problem to the roller ginner. Rubbing of the

steel stationary knife by the covering of the ginning roller and the

lint cotton during ginning generates a static charge on the lint sufficient to cause the ginned lint to adhere to the ginning roller, and

creates a serious doffing problem. When the surface moisture content

of the lint is not high enough to permit this static charge to dissipate

rapidly, the lint adheres to the doffer flights and is carried back on

the underside of the ginning roller to the stationary knife (figs. 4 and

15). A roller gin operating with and without static electricity is

shown in figure 15. If lint is allowed to accumulate, it will be pushed

20
BN 18404, BN 18403

FIGURE 15.— (A), Roller gin showing efifects of static electricity; and (B), the

same gin after live steam has been applied at the ginning point.

21
into the path of the moving knife. This generally damages the knives

and the ginning roller covering.

In a series of experiments, workers at the Southwestern Cotton

Ginning Eesearch Laboratory have attempted to eliminate undesirable

static electricity at the roller gin. Spinning-mill types of misting

spray nozzles were tried at numerous positions about the gin. The

resulting accumulation of moisture on the machinery prevented their

practical use. High potential ionization bars were investigated and

reduced static electricity, but the air could not be ionized at a location

that would allow the roller and doffer to shed the cotton satisfactorily

without prohibitive costs.

An economical method of increasing the surface moisture of the

lint is to raise the humidity of the air at or immediately before the

ginning point by the use of live steam. Numerous methods of putting

this steam into use, and numerous points of injection, can be found

in commercial roller gins today. Figure 16 gives the details of a steam

line used in the laboratory roller gin with very satisfactory results.

The location of the line with regard to the roller may vary considerably. The laboratory has found that mounting the steam line below

and to the back of the center line of the ginning roller with the outlet

holes directed toward the ginning area produces satisfactory results

with a small amount of steam and a minimum accumulation of dirt,

lint, and trash in the gin stand or seed board.

Eesults of recent tests at the Southwestern Cotton Ginning Eesearch

Laboratory and in commercial gins show that static electricity during

ginning can be controlled with an antistatic agent. The antistatic

agent Tween-20 ^ (manufactured by the Atlas Powder Company, Wil-

' Mention of trade products in this pubUcation does not imply their endorsement by the Department of Agriculture over similar products not named.

Outer pipe 'A" galvanized

Inner pipe

Ve" copper tubim

Location of steam line

under ginning roller

Steam pipe outlet holes

'/|6" dia. 2" o.e.

(counter sink )

'/*" galvanized

steam line from

-steam supply

~^^^É^

Details of Double Pipe Steam Line Under Ginning Roller

^

Bore A" galvanized

Steam outlet holes P*P^ *° Vs" pipe and

'/l6"dia. 2" o.e. . ^^oáBT together

-^ rr''''^-*i V / ^3/8" copper tubing »

Details of Inner Steam Line

FiGUEE 16.—Steam line for static electricity control.

22
mington, Del.) was tested for controlling static in a roller gin by two

methods: (1) spray application to seed cotton; (2) direct application

to the gin roller. The first was unsatisfactory; the second was satisfactory both in laboratory tests and at commercial gins. A mixture

of 1 to 2 parts of water and 1 part of Tween-20 was applied to the

gin rolls manually with a brush. Frequency of application was determined by the static conditions. Some ginners reported using two

applications per day of approximately 1 gallon of Tween-20 per 100

bales of cotton (6).

PNEUMATIC CONVEYING AND CLEANING OF PIMA LINT

The modern roller gin is equipped to handle ginned lint mechanically. Eesearch over the years has proved that conveying Pima

cotton lint pneumatically does not harm its quality. Air handling

alters the appearance of the lint as compared to manually pushing it

to the press, but otherwise lint quality remains the same. "Workers at

the U.S. Cotton Ginning Research Laboratory at Stoneville, Miss., designed and installed a suction nozzle and lint flue system first m 1936 at

Casa Grande, Ariz. (fig. 2). Koller gin plants built since 1950 have included in the ginning system a combination lint conveyor belt and

air blast nozzle pickup delivering to a conventional condenser and

double-box press (fig. 17). ^iInvestigations were begun by the Southwestern Cotton Gmnmg

Eesearch Laboratory on the effect of pneumatic lint handling in 1954,

when a pneumatic-type lint cleaner was installed between the air

nozzle pickup and the condenser. These studies were continued three

seasons, and the results of testing are shown in table 5.

BN 18401

FIGURE 17.—Lint handling system at the Southwestern Cotton Ginning Research

Laboratory : Lint belt, air nozzle pickup, pneumatic lint cleaner, and a doublebox press.

23
TABLE b.—Ejfects of pneumatic conveying and lint cleaning on harui-picked and machine-picked Pima cotton, 1954-56

Test item

Ginning results:

Lint moisture percent..

Nonlint content do

Lint cleaner trash per 480-Íb. bale Tpounds]^

Fiber analyses:

Classer, grade designation

Classer, staple K2d-in_ I

Fibrograph, upper half mean inchest '

Array, upper quartile do

Fiber neps per 100 sq. in

Spinning results:

Picker and card waste percent. _

Neps per 100 sq. in. card web

Yarn appearance index' I

Pneumatic conveying

Hand-picked

Before

4.9

3.4

1.8

46

1.47

7

9.86

11

105

After

0)

3.4

1.7

47

1.48

8

10.55

11

105

Machine-picked

Before

5. 9

6.3

3.8

45

L30

10

13.81

10

106

1 Lint moisture not greatly affected by pneumatic conveying and lint cleaning

2 Lmt cleaner not used. 3 JNJQ^ applicable.

After

0)

5.5

3.6

45

1.30

11

13. 52

11

104

Lint cleaning

Hand-picked

Before

4.9

3.3

1.6

47

L48

10. 11

12

107

After

0)

3. 1

1.0

1.5

47

1.49

10

10.09

12

104

Machine-picked

Before

5.0

5.5

3.7

45

1. 32

11

12.90

10

106

After

0)

4.8

3.2

3. 1

45

L31

12

12.30

13

102
The two types of pneumatic lint cleaners used in the laboratory

tests are shown in figures 18 and 19. Each of these units could be

bypassed. Few or no harmful effects were detected from either the

air handling or lint cleaning of hand-picked Pima cotton (table 5).

There was, however, a slight decrease in the amount of trash remaining in the lint after pneumatic lint cleaning, as indicated by the nonlint content and the very small increase in grade classification. Fiber

nep count increased only slightly and the resulting card web nep

count averaged the same before and after pneumatic handling or

pneumatic lint cleaning on hand-picked cotton.

FIGURE 18.—Pneumatic lint cleaner (courtesy of the Murray Co. of Texas).

25
Some of the results for machine-picked cotton are more pronounced.

Considerably more trash was removed from the lint, as shown in the

nonlint content and the averaj^e grade increase. This was due to

more trash being in the lint after ginning. As in the hand-picked

cotton, no harmful effects to the fiber were detected from either air

handling or pneumatic lint cleaning. The slight increase in the card

FIGURE 19.—Pneumatic lint cleaner (courtesy of the Lummus Gin Machinery

Co.).

26
web nep count probably accounts for the small decrease in average

yarn appearance.

The conclusion of the ginning laboratory after 3 years of study

is that air handling and pneumatic lint cleaning of hand-picked and

of machine-picked cotton can be done without detectable fiber damage.

SAW GINNING PIMA COHON

Considerable interest has been voiced in the results of saw ginning

American-Egyptian or Pima cotton. There is no evidence that this

practice exists anywhere commercially, and only limited data are

available from research on saw ginning Pima.

Small-scale studies of the saw ginning of American-Egyptian cotton

have been undertaken at the Southwestern Cotton Ginning Research

Laboratory several times in the past few years, primarily to establish

a guide as to the results to be expected from this method of ginning

Pima cotton. Prior to the development of thé' Pima Si variety that

has a semifuzzy seed, ginning Pima on a conventional saw gin was

practically impossible because a seed roll could not be maintained.

The Pima Si variety can be ginned on a saw gin under certain mechanical conditions. In 1956, limited tests were made under different

gin settings, such as saw spacing, air doffing pressures, methods of

doffing, and a few different saw tooth designs.

The effect on fiber quality of saw ginning as compared to roller ginning is summarized in table 6. For these comparisons the classifications of the saw-ginned Pima were based on roller ginned cotton

stands. Each saw-ginned sample was designated as verv neppy. Consequently, the average grade in the table may be misleading. Both

the classers' staple length and the Fibrograph upper half mean measurement show a shortening of staple by saw ginning. The fiber neps

were increased threefold by saw ginning, and the resulting neps m

the card web were reflected in a marked decrease in yarn appearance

for the saw-ginned cotton.

Other saw-ginning tests of Pima cotton were made with a gin having 10 saws of 10-inch diameter. Methods of doffing, doffing pressures,

saw-tooth designs, and saw and doffing-brush speeds were varied to

TABLE 6.—Roller ginning compared to saw ginning of Pima cotton

Test item Saw Roller

ginned ginned

7. 1 7. 1

5.2 5.2

29. 1 29. 6

11.2 2.2

43.2 46.5

3. 10 3.06

1.29 1.33

32.0 11.0

12. 24 11.54

37.0 13.0

99 108

Moisture content:

Wagon seed cotton percent

Lint do__

Lint turnout do_ _

Grade, classers'

Staple H2d inch

Nonlint content percent

Fibrograph, upper half mean inches

Fiber neps per 100 square inches.

Picker and card waste percent.

Neps in card web per 100 square inches

Yarn appearance index

1 Neppy.

27
obtain basic information as to where the fiber damage was taking

place in the gin stand. The results of these pilot ginning tests confirmed previous tests as to the high nep formation and fiber shortening. They also indicated that these harmful effects on the fiber were

accumulative in the seed roll and were not the effect of any one operation within the stand such as speed or doffing method.

SUMMARY

Roller ginning in the Southwest was begun early in the 20th century in the Imperial Valley of California and the Salt River Valley

of Arizona. In 1920 more than 92,000 bales of Pima cotton were produced in this country. Since 1920 production of American-Egyptian

cotton has varied greatly, and concurrently changes and improvements

in roller gin machinery design have been spasmodic. An increase in

production during World War II supplied the incentive for manufacturing new models of roller gins in 1942, but it was not until 1950

that American-Egyptian cotton production sparked further improvements in roller gin design. From 1942 to 1950 the general conception

of gin-plant designs and gin-machinery requirements changed from

two-story buildings and comparatively simple seed cotton cleaning

machinery plus very gentle handling of the cotton to the present-day

single-story gin building equipped with modern upland-cotton-type

cleaning machinery operating on a mass-production basis.

Roller ginning research was begun by the Department of Agriculture as far back as 1925. However, it was not until 1936 that extensive research on cleaning, drying, and lint handling was undertaken.

Research on the adjustments and operations of today's roller gins has

yielded basic engineering guides for operators in the field. Seed cotton cleaning and drying procedures ranging from simple to elaborate

systems have shown that American-Egyptian varieties now grown can.

be cleaned and dried by modern machinery and approved techniques

without harming the quality of the fiber. Research has also shown

that pneumatic conveying of both the seed cotton and the lint do not

harm fiber quality. Pneumatic lint cleaners are being used to improve

the grades without significant damage.

Improved methods of applying steam at the gin stand are controlling

static on the ginning roller. Copies of the design of a satisfactory

two-pipe steam system are available at the ginning laboratories.

Additional studies at both the ginning laboratory and at commercial

gins show that antistatic chemicals can be used to control static electricity. Brush applications of a solution of TAveen-20 and water to

the seed roll have proved satisfactory.

28
LITERATURE CITED

(1) ARKANSAS-MISSOURI COTTON GINNERS ASSOC.

[n.d.] COTTON GINNER'S HANDBOOK. 159 pp., illus. Blytheville, Ark.

(2) BENNETT, C. A.

1943. SIMPLIFIED PITOT TUBE CALCULATIONS OF AIB FLOW IN DUCTS AND

PIPES. Rev. Bur. Plant Indus., Soils and Agr. Engin., U.S. Dept.

Agr., 16 pp. [Processed.]

(3)

[1959] ROLLER COTTON GINNING DEVELOPMENTS. TexaS CottOU GiUUers'

Assoc & The Cotton Gin and Oil Mill Press, joint sponsors,

90 pp., illus.

(4) BUFFALO FORGE COMPANY.

1949. FAN ENGINEERING. Ed. 5, 808 pp., iUus. Buffalo, N.Y.

(5) JOHNSON, A. J., TOWNSEND, J. S., and WALTON, T. C.

1941. AMERICAN-EGYPTIAN COTTON QUALITY AND GINNING. Agr. Market.

Sew., Bur. Plant Indus., and Bur. Agr. Chem. and Engin. U.S.

Dept. Agr., 16 pp., illus. [Processed.]

(6) LEONARD, C. G.

1960. CONTROLLING STATIC ELECTRICITY ON COTTON DURING GINNING WITH

AN ANTISTATIC AGENT. U.S. Dept. Agr., Agr. Res. Serv., ARS

42-39, 16 pp., illus.

(7) SHAW, E. A. & Co., INC.

[n.d.] AMERICAN-EGYPTIAN COTTONS. A BRIEF HISTORY OF THIER DEVELOPMENT AND DESCRIPTION OF THEIR CHARACTERISTICS, 1900-1950. 18

pp. Boston.

(8) STEDRONSKY, V. L.

1956. EXTRA LONG STAPLE COTTON AND ROLLER GINNING. The CottOU

Ginners' Jour. Yearbook, v. 24, No. 1, pp. 37-39, illus.

(9) TEXAS COTTON GINNERS' ASSOC.

[n.d.] WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT AIR POLLUTION CONTROL. Spec. Bui. 1,

31 pp., illus. Dallas.

(10) TOWNSEND, J. S.

1925. GINNING PIMA CJOTTON IN ARIZONA. U.S. Dept. Agr. Dept. Bui.

1319,10 pp., illus.

(11) ^ MARTIN, W. J. and WALTON, T. C.

1940. SEA-ISLAND COTTON QUALITY AND GINNING. U.S. Dept. Agr.,

ACE-69,15 pp., illus.

(12) , WALTON, T. C, and MARTIN, W. J.

1940. ROLLER GIN CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATION. U.S.

Dept Agr., ACE-68, 14 pp., illus.

(13) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

1955. COTTON TESTING SERVICE : TESTS AVAILABLE, EQUIPMENT AND TECHNIQUES, AND BASIS FOR INTERPRETING RESULTS. U.S. Agr. Market.

Serv., AMS 16, 49 pp., illus.

(14)

1956. MODERNIZING COTTON GINS. Agr. Haudb. 99, 45 pp., illus.

(15)

1963. AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS. 1962: 83.

(16) WARE, J. O.

1936. PLANT BREEDING AND THE COTTON INDUSTRY. U.S. Dept Agr.

Yearbook 1936: 657-744.

29
APPENDIX

Supplemental engineering data applicable to roller ginning are

provided in this appendix. In addition, the reader is referred to other

literature (i, P, i^).

Fans and Piping

For handling materials efficiently by air, it is important to consider

(a) the rate of flow or velocity, and (b) the volume of air per pound

of material.

Materials commonly handled at the cotton gin by air and the velocities normally required for efficient handling are as follows :

Velocity for materials in pipes

(Feet per minute)

Seed cotton 4, 000-4, 500

Seed cotton in tower driers 1, 200

Dried seed cotton (from machine to machine) 3, 000

BoUies in tower drier 1, 500-1, 600

Seed 5, 000-5, 500

Hulls and trash 3,000-4,000

Lint cotton 1, 000-1, 500

Volume of air normally required per pound of material to be handled

is as follows :

Volume of air per pound of material

(Cubic feet

per minute)

Low pressure fans (8 to 20 inches of water) 40-50

Seed pumps 5-6

In handling material by air, two things must be satisfied: (1) Eate

of flow, and (2) volume of flow.

The gin operator can measure and calculate the air velocity and the

air volume of a system by a simple method (^, ^). All that he needs

to make these measurements is a Pitot tube (C) and a U-tube or

manometer (D), shown in figure 20. The procedure is as follows :

First make a small hole in the pipe in which the air is to be measured, at least 4 diameters away from the fan or any elbow or other

interference in the straight flow of air. Insert the Pitot tube into the

hole and point the nose or open end upstream with the tube parallel

with the pipe and in the center of the pipe. The difference shown

between the two water columns in the manometer is the impact or

total pressure (Pt). By removing the Pitot tube and placing one

lead from the manometer against the hole or by pointing the Pitot

tube downstream to the direction of air flow the difference in the manometer water columns is the resistance or static pressure (Ps) of the

piping. The difference between the total pressure (Pt) and the static

pressure (Ps) is the velocity pressure (Pv). From basic engineering formulae the equation

V (velocity in feet per minute) =997.5K \/Fv (velocity pressure

in inches of water)

31
3" to 4"-

7^

y4" Glass tubing

15"

to

20"

a

^^=^

TPs

*^

°z

KZ>^ i

At least 4 pipe diameters

FIGURE 20.—Testing fan suction and discharge of piping.

has been derived where K is a constant varying with the atmospheric

pressure, the temperature of the air, and the humidity of the air.

Table 7 gives a value B (997.5K) for various altitudes, based on a

barometric pressure at sea level of 29.92 inches of mercury and an

average temperature of 70° F.

The volume of air being handled is obtained by the formula

Volume (cubic feet per minute) = Velocity (feet per minute) multiplied by the cross-sectional area of the size of pipe being measured

in square feet.

Table 8 gives the cross-sectional area of the common sizes of gin

pipe in square feet. By following these means of measurement and

the formula calculations, the air volume can be fairly accurately

calculated.

Table 9 is included to enable the operator to get a fairly accurate

account of air velocity and volume without calculations. This table

is computed on the basis of a barometric pressure of 30 inches of mercury, 70° F. air temperature, and 0 percent relative humidity. However, at 70° it is accurate within 1.0 percent at any humidity. Also, at

70°, a barometric pressure change from 30 inches of mercury at sea

level to 26 inches at 4,000 feet altitude would not change the air velocity

appreciably. When measuring velocity or volume of air at high temperature and low relative humidity, a correction factor must be used

Power requirements for modern roller gins are as great as for saw

ginning plants. Since fans consume from 50 to 65 percent of the

power required by the modem gin, itis important thatthe ginner operate his fans at their most economical and efficient speeds. Capacity

or volume of air moved per unit of time (normally measured as cubic

feet per minute) varies directly with the speed of the fan. Pressure

varies as the square of the speed, and power varies as the cube of the

speed. Thus, if the speed is doubled, the volume is doubled, but the

32
TABLE 7.—Altitude connection for commuting air velocities when using Pitot tubes

[Air velocity in feet per minute equals constant multiplier B times the square root of the velocity head in inches of water measured at

the center of a pipe with a Pitot tube. Constant multiplier A is for use when making traverse readings]

Altitude above sea level (feet) Relative air

density ^

Real air

density

per cubic

foot (d) 2

Cubic feet per

pound of dry

air (1/d)

(1/d) /2

Constant

multiplier A

(1/d) H X 1096.23

Constant

multiplier B

(1/d) 1/2X997.5 3

0

500 _.

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,600

4,000

4,400

000

981

962

944

926

909

891

872

858

846

Pounds

0. 0750

.0736

. 0722

.0708

. 0694

.0682

.0668

.0654

. 0644

. 0634

13. 333

13. 587

13. 850

14. 124

14. 409

14. 663

14. 970

15. 290

15. 528

15. 773

3. 6515

3. 6860

3. 7215

3. 7581

3. 7959

3. 8357

3. 8691

3. 9102

3. 9405

3. 9715

4,003

4,041

4,080

4, 120

4, 161

4,205

4,241

4,286

4,320

4,353

3,641

3,675

3,711

3,747

3,785

3,825

3,858

3,899

3,929

3,960

1 From Buffalo Forge Co. (4).

2 Based on a base density of 0.0750 lb. per cubic foot of dry air (0% relative humidity) at 70° F. and 29.92 in. of mercury barometric pressure.

3 See Bennett i2).

CO
TABLE 8.—Oross-sectional area of cotton gin piping for use with

ÜSDA cotton piping chart

Diameter of pipe Cross-sectional

area of pipe

Diameter of pipe Cross-sectional

area of pipe

Inches

8 -_.___-_

S,qu<ire feet

0. 3491

.4418

.5454

.6600

.7215

.7854

.8522

Inches

13

Square feet

0. 9218

9 _- - 13H - .9940

10 14_ _ _ _ __ _ 1.069

11 __ _ _ 14H

15 - - -_- -_

1. 147

11^2 1.227

12 16 1.396

12H

pressure becomes four times greater and the power eight times greater.

Consequently, the lower the pressure the fan operates against and the

lower the volume of air used to do the job, the greater the power

savings.

Tables 10-15 in the nomograph (fig. 21) are included as guides for

the ginner in determining the type, size, and speeds of fans necessary

in performing the most efficient and economical material handling job.

A^lso, for any set of measured conditions the ginner may determine

whether his fans are overpowered, underpowered, running too fast or

too slow, and what he can expect in performance when he changes any

of these conditions. Tables 10, 11, and 12 are engineering facts pertaining to the most common types of gin fans, and tables 13, 14, and

15 are actual fan performance tables obtained by measuring the fans

under operating conditions (i, ^).

34
Volume

(C.F.M.)

Fern

Horsepower

7500

7000

6600

6000

5500

6000

4500

4000

3500

3000

2500.

2000

1500

1000

32

30

28

26

24

22

20 -I

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2 «

-.31

29

-27

-.25

23

«21

-19

-17

15

-.13

-11

- 9

- 7

_ 5

- 3

Instructions for use:

Place a straight edge on Scale A and Scale B

points which respectively correspond to the air

volume and resistance pressure (static)» This

line will then cut Scale C at the correct horsepower consumption of the fan«

Resistance

Pressure

(Inches)

B

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2'

FIGURE 21.—Nomograph for determining approximate horsepower for fans from

air readings.

35
Cil

TABLE 9.—Velocities and volumes corresponding to P^ readings and pipe diameter ^

VP7

Velocity, feet

per

Cross-sectional area in square feet (first row) and pipe diameter in inches (second row) 2

._. _

Pr, inches 0.4418 0.4922 0.5454 0.6013 0.6600 0.7215 0.7854 0.8522 0.9218 0.9940 1.069 1.147 1.227 1.396 1.576

of water minute

'

9I/Í 10 lOH 11 UK 12 123^ 13 13H 14 14K 15 16 17

0.1 0.32 1,168 516 575 637 702 771 842 917 995 1,077 1,161 1,249 1,340 1,433 1,630 1,841

.2 .45 1,642 725 808 895 987 1,084 1,185 1,290 1,400 1,514 1,633 1,756 1,884 2,016 2,293 2,588

.3 .55 2,008 887 988 1,095 1,207 1,325 1,448 1,577 1,710 1,851 1,995 2,146 2,302 2,463 2,802 3,164

.4 .63 2,300 1,016 1,132 1,254 1,383 1,518 1,659 1,806 1,959 2,120 2,286 2,458 2,637 2,822 3,210 3,624

.5 .71 2,592 1,144 1,276 1,414 1,559 1,710 1,869 2,036 2,208 2,389 2,576 2,770 2,972 3,180 3,618 4,084

.6 .77 2,810 1,241 1,383 1,533 1,690 1,855 2,027 2,208 2,395 2,591 2,794 3,004 3,223 3,448 3,923 4,429

.7 .84 3.066 1,354 1,509 1,672 1,844 2,024 2,212 2,408 2,612 2,827 3,048 3,278 3,516 3,762 4,280 4,832

.8 .89 3,248 1,435 1,599 1,772 1,953 2,144 2,343 2,552 2,768 2.995 3,229 3,473 3,725 3,986 4,534 5,119

.9 .95 3,467 1,531 1,706 1,891 2,085 2,289 2,501 2,724 2,954 3,197 3,447 3,707 3,977 4,255 4,840 6,464

1.0 1.00 3,650 1,612 1,797 1,991 2,195 2,409 2,633 2,867 3,110 3,365 3,628 3,902 4,186 4,479 5,095 5,752

1.1 1.05 3,832 1,693 1,886 2,091 2,304 2,529 2,765 3,010 3,265 3,533 3,809 4,097 4,395 4,703 5,350 6,039

1.2 1.10 4,015 1,773 1,976 2,170 2,414 2,650 2,896 3,154 3,421 3,701 3,991 4,292 4,605 4,927 5,604 6,328

1.3 1.14 4,161 1,838 2,048 2,270 2,502 2,746 3,002 3,268 3,545 3,836 4,136 4,448 4,772 5,106 5,808 6,558

1.4 1.18 4,307 1,902 2,120 2,349 2,590 2,843 3,111 3,383 3,670 3,971 4,281 4,604 4,939 5,285 6,012 6.788

1.5 1.22 4,453 1,967 2,192 2,429 2,678 2,939 3,212 3,498 3,794 4,105 4,426 4,760 5,107 5,464 6,215 7,018

1.6 1.26 4,599 2,031 2,264 2,508 2,765 3,035 3,318 3,612 3,919 4,240 4,571 4,916 5,274 5,644 6,420 7,248

1.7 1.30 4,745 2,096 2,335 2,588 2,853 3,132 3,423 3,727 4,043 4,374 4,716 5,073 5,442 5,823 6,623 7,478

1.8 1.34 4,891 2,160 2,407 2,668 2,941 3,228 3,528 3,842 4,167 4,509 4,862 5,229 5,609 6,002 6,827 7,708

1.9 1.38 5,037 2,225 2,479 2,748 3,029 3,324 3,634 3,956 4,292 4,644 5,007 5,385 5,777 6,181 7,031 7,938

2.0 1.41 5,146 2,273 2,533 2,807 3,094 3,397 3,713 4,042 4,385 4,745 5,115 5,502 5,902 6,315 7,184 8,110

2.1 1.45 5,292 2,337 2,605 2,887 3,182 3,493 3,818 4,157 4,509 4,879 5,261 5,658 6,070 6,495 7,388 8,340

2.2 1.48 5,402 2,386 2,659 2,947 3,248 3,565 3,897 4,243 4,603 4,980 5,369 5,775 6,195 6,629 7,541 8,514

2.3 1.52 5,548 2,450 2,731 3,026 3,336 3,662 4,002 4,358 4,727 5,114 5,515 5,931 6,363 6,808 7,744 8,744

2.4 1.55 5,658 2,499 2,785 3,086 3,402 3,734 4,081 4,444 4,820 5,216 5,623 6,048 6,488 6,942 7,897 8,917

2.5 1.58 5,767 2,547 2,839 3,146 3,468 3,806 4,160 4,530 4,914 5,317 5,732 6,165 6,614 7,077 8,050 9,089

2.6 1.61 5,876 2,596 2,892 3,205 3,533 3,878 4,240 4,615 5.008 5,416 5,841 6,281 6,740 7,210 8,203 9,260

2.7 1.64 5,986 2,644 2,946 3,265 3,599 3,951 4,319 4,701 5,101 5,518 5,950 6,399 6,866 7,345 8,356 9,434

2.8 1.67 6,096 2,693 3,000 3,325 3,666 4.023 4,398 4,788 5,195 5,6.9 6,059 6,517 6,992 7,480 8,510 9,607

2.9 1.70 6,205 2,741 3,054 3,384 3,731 4,095 4,477 4,873 5,288 5,720 6,168 6,633 7,117 7,614 8,662 9,779

3.0 1.73 6,314 2,790 3,108 3,443 3,797 4,167 4,556 4,959 5,381 5,820 6,276 6,750 7,242 7,747 8,814 9,951

1 Velocity—3,650 VPV; volume—velocity times cross-sectional area of pipe.

2 Cross-sectional area of 6 inches=0.1964; 8 inches=0.3491; 8>^ inches=0.3941; 18 inches=1.767; 19 inches=1.969; 20 inches=2.182.
TABLE 10.—Wheel diameters for fans of various sizes

Make of fan No. 30 fan No. 35 fan No. 40 fan No. 45 fan

ABC type Gi__

Clarage type C_

Continental

Barley 2

Boardman ^

Sturtevant C

Inches

22

20^8

20

18

32 X 4

20

Inches

25

23%

20/2

32 X 6

25/8

Inches

28

26K

27

23

32 X 8

26%

Inches

31

30K8

30

26

32 X 10

30K

^ Type C wheels have 18 blades with rims.

2 Plain 6-blade wheel.

3 Width of wheel determines size.

TABLE 11.—Rembert fans compared with standard fans

Size of Rembert fan

Proportion of

standard fan

volume at

same speed

Conversion

factor *

35/30

40/35

45/40 or 40/45_

3/8

1/2

5/8 to 3/4

2.66

2.00

1.33

1 Multiply standard fan speed by this factor to obtain desired Rembert fan

TABLE VI,—Most efficient operating speed for fans 0f various sizes ^

Type and size of fan Operating speed

Burr: No. 25_-_- _ . ______ ___.

R.p.m.

Up to 2,000

Standard:

No, 30 1,600-1,800

No. 35 1,600-1,800

Standard or special:

No. 40 _ __ -- - . -_ - 1,500-1,750

No. 45 1,500-1,750

No. 50 1,100-1,200

Standard: No. 60_ _. .__.__ _____ 1,000-1,100

1 Courtesy, The Boardman Co.

37
(O

00

TABLE 13.—Volume of air delwered^ most efßcient operating speed, and brake horsepower required for most commonly used gin fans equippedwith long shavi/ngs wheels and operating against given static pressures

Item

Static pressure

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15

No. 30:

Volume, c.f.m

Speed, r.p.m

Brake horsepower

No. 35:

Volume, c.f.m

Speed, r.p.m

Brake horsepower

No. 40:

Volume, c.f.m

Speed, r.p.m

Brake horsepower

No. 45:

Volume, c.f.m

Speed, r.p.m

Brake horsepower

No. 50:

Volume, c.f.m

Speed, r.p.m

Brake horsepower

1,586

1,040

0.90

2, 170

905

1. 23

2,794

800

1.58

3,526

694

2.00

4,312

631

2.43

1,982

1,285

1. 69

2,712

1, 110

2. 31

3, 492

984

2.97

4,407

850

3.75

5,390

776

4.58

2,379

1,490

2. 73

3,255

1,295

3, 74

4, 191

1, 140

4.80

5,289

990

6. 06

6,468

905

7.40

2,577

1,650

3.66

3,526

1,430

5.00

4,540

1, 266

6.45

5,730

1, 100

8. 14

7,007

1, 000

9.91

2,775

1,805

14.72

3,797

1, 570

6.45

4,889

1,390

8.30

6. 170

1,205

10. 50

7,546

1,095

12.80

2,974

1,950

5.86

4,068

1,695

8.04

5, 239

1,495

10.35

6, 610

1,300

13. 05

8,085

1, 180

15.95

3, 172

2,090

7. 16

4,340

1,805

9. 80

5,588

1, 600

12.60

7,052

1,385

15. 95

8,624

1, 265

19. 45

3,370

2, 210

8.57

4,611

1,920

11.71

5,937

1,700

15. 10

7,493

1, 470

19.05

9, 163

1,345

23.25

3,568

2, 330

10. 15

4,882

2, 025

13.90

6, 286

1,790

17.85

7,933

1,550

22. 60

9,702

1,415

27.60

3,767

2, 450

11.80

5, 153

2, 125

16.20

6,636

1,880

20.80

8,373

1,630

26.30

10, 241

1, 485

32. 10

3,965

2, 560

13.50

5,425

2, 225

18.50

6,985

1,970

23.80

8,815

1,710

30. 10

10, 780

1,555

36.70

4, 163

2, 665

15.40

5, 696

2,320

21.00

7,334

2,050

27. 10

9,256

1,775

34.20

11, 319

1,620

41.85

4,361

2,860

18. 55

5,967

2,480

25. 40

7,683

2, 190

32.70

9,696

1,900

41.30

11, 858

1,735

50.40
TABLE 14.—Volume of air delivered^ most efficient operating speedy and brake horsepower required for most commonly used gin fans equipped with type C wheels and operating against given static pressures

Item

Static pressure

10 11 12 13 14 15

No. 30:

Volume, c.f.m

Speed, r.p.m

Brake horsepower

No. 35:

Volume, c.f.m

Speed, r.p.m

Brake horsepower

No. 40:

Volume, c.f.m

Speed, r.p.m

Brake horsepower

No. 45:

Volume, c.f.m

Speed, r.p.m

Brake horsepower

No. 50:

Volume, c.f.m

Speed, r.p.m

Brake horsepower

2,379

1,302

2.76

3,255

1, 121

3. 78

4, 191

973

4 87

5,289

868

6. 14

6,468

786

7.50

2,775

1,465

4.08

3,797

1,261

5.58

4,889

1,096

7. 18

6, 170

977

9.07

7,546

886

11.05

2,974

1,606

5.22

4,068

2,381

7. 14

5,239

1,200

9.21

6,610

1,071

11.62

8,086

970

14 15

3, 172

1,727

6.46

4,340

1,487

8.83

5,588

1,291

11.37

7,052

1, 152

14.38

8,624

1,043

17.50

3,370

1,845

7.80

4,611

1,586

10.68

5,937

1,379

13.75

7,493

1,230

17.38

9,163

1. 114

21. 15

3,568

1,955

9.33

4,882

1,678

12.75

6,286

1,459

16.40

7,933

1,305

20.75

9,702

1,181

25.25

3,965

2,085

11.68

5,425

1,794

15.96

6,985

1,560

20.53

8,815

1,392

25.93

10, 780

1,260

31.60

3,965

2, 160

12.70

5,425

1,859

17.35

6,985

1,612

22.35

8,815

1,440

28.22

10, 780

1,303

34 40

4,163

2, 265

14 52

5,696

1,948

19.85

7,334

1,691

25.55

9,256

1,510

32. 25

11, 319

1,370

39.40

4,361

2,360

16. 50

5,967

2,029

22. 59

7,683

1,762

29.06

9,696

1,572

36.70

11, 858

1,423

44 75

4,560

2,450

18.70

6,238

2, 111

25.60

8,033

1,832

32.90

10, 138

1,635

41.60

12, 397

1,482

50.72

4,758

2,540

20.80

6,510

2, 180

28.45

8,382

1,898

36.60

10, 578

1,692

46.20

12, 936

1,532

56.40
TABLE 15.—Approximate average horsepoioer required for a fan

operating under specified conditions

Volume Resistance pressure against which fan is operating (inches)

of air

handled

by fan

(c.f.m.) 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0

Hv. Hv. Hp. Hv. Hv. Hv. Hv. Hv. Hv. Hv.

3,000 _._ 10.8 11. 4 12.3 13. 2 14. 2 15. 1 16. 1 17.0 18.0 18. 9

3,500. __ 12. 1 13.2 14.3 15. 4 16. 5 17.7 18.7 19. 8 20.9 22.0

4,000.-_ 13.9 15. 1 16.4 17.6 18.9 20. 1 21.4 22. 6 23.9 25. 2

4,500. __ 15.6 17.0 18. 4 19.8 21.2 22. 6 24. 1 25.5 26.9 28. 4

5,000.. _ 17.3 18.9 20.5 22. 1 23.6 25. 2 26.8 27. 4 29. 9 31. 5

5,500__. 19. 1 20.8 22.5 24. 2 26.0 27. 7 29. 4 31. 2 32. 9 34.6

6,000... 20.8 22.7 24.6 26.5 28. 4 30.2 32. 1 34.0 35.9 37. 8

6,500... 22.6 24.6 26.6 28. 7 30. 7 32.8 34.8 36. 8 38.9 40. 9

7,000. __ 24.3 26.5 28. 7 30. 9 33. 1 35.3 37.5 39. 7 42.0 44. 2

Gin Roller Coverings

Practically all gin rollers are covered with strips of packing made

of cotton ducking and rubber. The roller core is either spool or spiral

wound. Figure 22 shows these two roller coverings. The spiralSPIRAL COVERED ROLLER

With leather moting strip between every

second packing strip

3^^

il

SPOOL WOUND ROLLER

Moting grooves ore cut on a spiral

out of the surface of the pocking

FIGURE 22.—Gin roUer coverings.

40
wound roller sheds the motes and fine trash from the ginning point

without the aid of moting grooves. However, repairs to the packing

cover of the spool-wound roller can be made without removing all the

packing.

It is often necessary or desirable to cover the gin roller at the gin.

Figures 23 and 24 are given as a guide to the construction of homemade

rigs required to do a good job of covering. In making this device, short

cross blocks are mounted on the left end of a work oench far enough

apart to allow a gin roller to be mounted in between. Pillow block

bearings are then attached to the cross blocks so that the roller shaft

may be clamped into place. A large-diameter pulley for use as a

crank is then placed on the left end of the shaft so that the roller can

be turned as the covering work proceeds. A 2 x 4-inch timber is attached to one end of the cross blocks on edge in front of the roller and

parallel to the roller shaft. A 11/2 x 11/2 x 1/8-inch angle iron is

bolted to the top of the 2 x 4-inch timber. The ends of this angle iron

are turned up and drilled to receive a guide rod. This guide rod is

5/16 inch in diameter, threaded on the ends, and bolted in the angle

iron section. A pusher block for holding the packing strips during the

covering operation is mounted on the guide rod as illustrated in figure

23. The forward edge of this channel iron pusher block is cut and

bent down at a right angle and at approximately 24° with the center

line of the roller. On the part of the channel iron that is bent down,

four holes are drilled and tapped for 3/16 x 5/8-inch sharpened

machine screws, inserted so that the points can make contact with the

packing during the covering operation.

The roller is laid off for the first strip by driving a small nail part

way into the core on each end of the roller in a line parallel with the

TOP VIEW

i^v\vu(/Fyy/y/yyy///ky//////7/j

£NP VI^W

T I ^

DETAIL of Pusher *B*

FIGURE 23.—Homemade mechanism for covering the roUer gin roU with provisions for stretching the packing evenly.

41
roller shaft. A string is tied to one nail and passed around the roller

core to the other nail making one complete spiral turn. This establishes a line position for the first packing strip. Glue is applied to the

roller core along the positioning line. The packing covering is started

by nailing one end of the strip at the left end of the roller over the

glue. The packing is then spiraled around the roller and secured at

the other end. IS'ails are put tlirough the strip every 3 or 4 inches to

hold it firmly in position as a guide for the succeeding spiral. After

two strips have been attached tliis Avay, the succeeding strips are

started at the left end and the pusher block is wedged between the

angle guide and the packing strip. By pulling the roller forward

the packing is forced tightly against the two strips that are on the

roller. The pusher block is moved to the right as strips are progressively nailed.

Some mechanical device should be provided to maintain uniform

tension on each strip as it is wound on the roller. Such a device for a

60-pound weight is shown in figure 23. Clamp A (fig. 23) is attached

to cable C which passes over a small pulley and is fastened to weight

F, which is free to move up or down. The arm of lever D is moved

to the right and fixed with the pin G, which raises the weight and

TOP VIEW

Press wheel

END VIEW

FIGURE 24.—Mechanism for beveling the sides of the packing strips.

42
allows clamp A to be slipped on the packing strip to about 6 inches

from the right end of the roll. Pin G is then removed to allow the

weight to exert its force on the strip. The roller is then turned one

revolution and the packing nailed to the other or right end of the roller.

The arm of the lever is then moved back to the right, releasing the

pull of the weight and the packing is cut oiï. Then the strip which

has just been laid on is nailed to the roller using pusher block B to

press it firmly against the previous strip. Glue is applied generously

with a 1-inch brush before the laying of each strip. Care should be

taken, however, not to apply so much glue that it will squeeze up between the packing strip and cause trouble during ginning.

In order to place the packing on the roller so that the strips will lie

close together, it is necessary to bevel the side of the strips. It is a

tedious and difficult job with a jack plane. The mechanism shown in

figure 24 has been employed successfully. It consists of a coarse emery

wheel, adjustable guides, and a small press wheel to hold the strip

down while the emery wheel is beveling the strip. A circular saw is

placed to the side of the emery wheel to make the first rough cut, thus

relieving the load on the emery wheel so that it makes only the finishing smooth cut. The saw should be slightly smaller in diameter than

the emery wheel. A speed of 800 to 1,000 r.p.m. is recommended because the emery wheel has a tendency to clog up and burn the material at higher speeds.

Seed Cotton Reclaimers

The most prevalent variety of American-Egyptian cotton grown is

Pima SI. It has a semifuzzy seed, which presents a problem in

clearing the seed away from the ginning point fast enough without

dropping some seed cotton into the seed disposal system. Ginning

capacity can be increased by moving the seed fingertips back from the

moving knife and by using a seed grid with the fingers spaced as much

as three-eighths inch apart; however, with this adjustment considerable seed cotton is dropped into the seed. This seed cotton is then

reclaimed by a unit at the end of a battery of gins and fed back into

the suction line. Figure 25 is a schematic diagram of one such unit

being successfully employed in an Arizona roller gin. The seed and

seed cotton are being carried by a conveyor belt under the stands to a

seed dropper at the end of each battery. During the travel down the

belt, the seed tends to settle out leaving the seed cotton riding free on

top of the seed. This seed cotton is picked up by a reclaimer saw and

scrubbed over %-inch grid bars spaced approximately 11/^ inches on

centers with V^-inch clearance between the grid bars and the reclaimer

saws. The seed dislodged by the first saw falls back onto the conveyor

belt and that dislodged by the second saw drops through a sheet

metal shoot directly into the seed dropper. The reclaimed seed cotton

is sucked off the upper saw by a direct suction to the suction line

separator immediately before the separator.

When a small-pipe pneumatic seed line is used, the seed and seed

cotton from the auger system can be passed through a reclaimer unit

between the auger outlet and the seed dropper. Since some of the

seed cotton dropped by the seed fingers is hard lock or immature

cotton, it is advisable to feed the reclaimed cotton back into the system

43
4-inch suction line to suction

separator

Rectangular to round suction

nozzle

j dia. bar

grids \j o.e.

^ clearance

Reclaimer saws, 5 dia.

^-inch clearance

Seed conveyor troughFiQURE 25.—Schematic diagram of a seed cotton reclaimer being employed to

reclaim seed cotton from the seed belt in an Arizona roller gin.

during ginning rather than accumulate it to be fed back into the

system from the overflow. Feeding this reclaimed cotton as overflow

cotton could conceivably resultin a two-sided bale.

Mill-type Lint Opener-cleaners

Mill-type opener and air jet cleaner combinations are now being

employed in several roller gin plants. These units are reported to be

very effective in improving the lint grade by removing motes, broken

seed, entanglements caused by the machine pickers, and pin trash that

had not been removed by the seed cotton cleaning machinery. A

schematic diagram of the type of lint opener-cleaner being used is

shown in figure 26. The lint cotton is picked up by a suction nozzle

from the end of the lint conveyor belt and carried to a condenser

from which it is fed into a Buckley beater-type opener-cleaner. This

unit fluffs or breaks open the lint bat and carries it over closely spaced

grid bars where some of the motes and pin trash are removed. From

the opener the lint passes through a pneumatic-type lint cleaner.

44
r\

ífs

r^

Condenser suction fans

Lint conveyor

bell

i

:zy

Suction

r^ condensers

Pneumatic

lint cleaner.

ffS

To press

condenser

Mill type jSJi

opener

cleaner —

Suction nozzle '^rash

%

O) 'Trash

Fl'

XÎ \

Booster tons Trash

FiGUKE 26.—Schematic diagram of the mill-type opener-cleail,er used in some of

today's roller gins.

From here it moves pneumatically into a second opener-cleaner combination and on to the press suction condenser.

The Southwestern Cotton Ginning Eesearch Laboratory is carrying

on cooperative research with commercial gins to further evaluate the

use of this particular type of opener-cleaner arrangement. Figure 27

shows one of the units installed in a commercial gin.

FiGUBE 27.—Mill-type opener-cleaner installation in a roller gin.

45

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTrNG OFFICE : 1964 O—705-424