alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## THE ATIT~RNEY GENERAL OF -XAS

January8,1976 Honorable Everett L. Anschutz OpinionNo. H-759 Executive Secretary Employees Retirement System of Texas Re: Whether credit P. 0. Box 12337, Capitol Station military service is for to be Austin, Texas 78711 countedwhen determining eligibility for judicial retirement. Dear Mr. Anschutz: You have requested our opinion concerning the construction of House Bill 887. Acts 1975, 64th Leg., ch. 522, p. 1367. The Bill amends article 622833, section ZA,V.T.C.S., to provide in part:

Any contributingmember of the Judicial Retirement System who has completed eight (8)or more years of service creditableunder the Judicial RetirementAct
. . .may receive creditable service for not more than forty-eight (48)months of federal military active duty serviceperformed during time of armed conflictby paying to the Judicial Retirement System for deposit in the General Revenue Fund an amount equal to 6 percent of his currentmonthly salary for eachmonth of suchmilitary service established. Article 6228b, section 4, provides in part:

Any person who has served on one (1)or more Courts of this State
. . . for twenty-four (24)years or more at any time
. . . shall likewisebe entitled to retirementpay . . . .

p.3206The Honorable Everett L. Anschutz - page 2 (H-759)

Your question iswhether service credited under section 2A may be consideredas service "on one (1)or more Courts of this State" within themeaning of section 4. Prior to its amendment, section 2A provided:

The time served in the armed forces of the United States governmentduring the time of war by any Judge comingwithin the purview of this Statute shall be credited to the length of judicial service, if such services in the armed forces of the United States governmentwere during the elective tenure of such Judge. We believe it to be clear that creditable service obtained under the former section 2A would have been "credited to the length of judicial service"under section 4. Other statutes pertaining to credit in retirement systems formilitary service similarlydefine "creditableservice." V.T.C.S. art. 6228a, 99 4A and 4G; V.T.C.S. art. 6228g, 9 2(11). We are aware of no legislative intent to restrict the definition of "creditableservice" as used in the present section 2A. In the absence of such an intent, article 6228b shouldbe given a "pro-beneficiaryconstruction." Attorney General Opinion H-348 (1974);See Woods v. Reilly, 218 S.W.2d 437 (Tex.SUD.1949). Accoxnslv. it is our oDinion that Years credited formilitary serv&.under section 2A are to be consideredyears of service "on one (1)or more of the Courts of this State" for purposes of section 4. SUMMARY Military service creditedunder section 2A of article 622813 shouldbe considered as service on the Courts of Texas for purposes of section 4 of article 6228b. -Very trulyyours,

L. HILL Attorney General of Texas

p.3207The Honorable Everett L. Anschutz - page 3 (H-759)

APPROVED:

WAssiskf DAVID M. NDALL, 

# -4

C. ROBERT HEATHS Ph=.**?

, “..LLI...I. Opinion Committee jwb

p. 3208
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                CERTIFICATION


I, Brian J. Kelley certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cognitronics
Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
   that material information relating to the registrant,
   including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
   by others within those entities, particularly during the
   period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
   controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
   the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation
   Date"); and
   c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
   the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
   based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):
   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
   internal controls which could adversely affect the
   registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
   financial data and have identified for the registrant's
   auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
   management or other employees who have a significant role in
   the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: November 14, 2003



/s/ Brian J. Kelley
Brian J. Kelley
Chief Executive Officer
##### 



COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Mary Jane Johnson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comprehensive Care Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants second fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Mary Jane JohnsonJanuary 12, 2005
    
    Mary Jane JohnsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 17
#### S. K. MIRCHICH, Appellant, v. Erich GEDALIUS, Appellee.

No. 73-920.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries at December 31, 2003:

      Name                                     State of Incorporation/Formation

      Alpha Gulf Coast, Inc.                               Delaware
      Alpha St. Regis, Inc.                                Delaware
      Alpha Missouri, Inc.                                 Delaware
      Alpha Monticello, Inc.                               Delaware
      Alpha Rising Sun, Inc.                               Delaware
      Jubilation Lakeshore, Inc.                           Mississippi
      (including its previously 93% owned subsidiary)
      Casino Ventures, L.L.C.                              Mississippi
      Alpha Greenville Hotel, Inc.                         Delaware
      Alpha Entertainment, Inc.                            Delaware
      Alpha Florida Entertainment, Inc.                    Florida
      Alpha Peach Tree Corporation                         Delaware
      Alpha Florida Entertainment, L.L.C.                  Florida
      Alpha Casino Management Inc.                         Delaware

Additional after January 12, 2004

Monticello Casino Management, LLC                          New York
Mohawk Management, LLC                                     New York
Monticello Raceway Development, LLC                        New York
Monticello Raceway Management, Inc.                        New York
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58754-58755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28806]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Geosciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science

[[Page 58755]]

Foundation announces the following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Geosciences (1756).
    Date & Time: Friday, November 21; 8:30 AM--5:00 PM.
    Place: Room 360, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Michael R. Reeve, Section Head, Division of 
Ocean Sciences, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 
725, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1582.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate OCE's Career proposals as part of 
the selection process for awards.
    Reason For Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in The Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 27, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-28806 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                          China World Trade Corporation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

This Agreement dated 8 September 2002 entered into between and by:

PARTY A: China World Trade Corporation, c/o 4th Floor Goldlion Network Center,
         138 Tiyu Road East, Tianhe, Guangzhou, the PRC 510620

PARTY B: Bernard Kwong-chung Chan of 65 Cadogan Street, #217, 2nd Floor, Kennedy
         town, Hong Kong

                                    RECITALS

         Party A is a public company with business provided in the major areas
of business recreational club, online trading services, and trading brokerage
and agency services; and Party A owed Party B a total amount of US$15,000.00
(the "Consideration Amount") of U.S. consultant fee as of 31 July 2002.

WHEREAS:

1.       Party B agrees to convert the Consideration Amount that Party A owned
         into the shares of the common stock of Party A which shall rank
         pari-passu to the existing common stock; and Party A agrees to issue or
         cause to issue a total of SEVENTY-THREE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND
         FIFTY-FIVE (73,355) POST 30-TO-1 REVERSE SPLIT SHARES of its common
         stock to Party B for the settlement of the Consideration Amount (the
         "Transaction").

2.       Party A agrees to pay for all the expenses in relation to the issuance
         of its shares of common stock to Party B.

3.       Upon signing of this Agreement and the completion of the issuance of
         shares of the common stock of Party A to Party B, neither Party A nor
         Party B would claim the counter party for any form of additional damage
         and/or settlement regarding the Consideration Amount.

4.       Both parties agree to keep all information regarding the Transaction
         and its business or affairs which are known to the Parties in
         connection with this Agreement strictly confidential and shall release
         such information only to parties authorized by either party.

5.       This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Hong Kong Special
         Administrative Region and the Parties shall submit to the jurisdiction
         thereof.

For and on behalf of                     For and on behalf of
Party A                                  Party B

/s/ John Hui                             /s/ Bernard Chan
-----------------------------------      -----------------------------------
Mr. John HUI                             Bernard Chan
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5917-6]


Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 
Restrictions; Petition for Exemption--Class I Hazardous Waste 
Injection; CECOS International, Inc. (CECOS)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final decision on petition modification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that modification of an exemption to 
the land disposal restrictions under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste 
Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act has been 
granted to CECOS, for the Class I injection well located at Sulphur, 
Louisiana. As required by 40 CFR part 148, the company has adequately 
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Environmental Protection Agency 
by petition and supporting documentation that, to a reasonable degree 
of certainty, there will be no migration of hazardous constituents from 
the injection zone for as long as the waste remains hazardous. This 
final decision allows the underground injection by CECOS, of the 
specific restricted hazardous waste identified in the exemption 
modification, into the Class I hazardous waste injection well at the 
Sulphur, Louisiana facility specifically identified in the modified 
exemption, for as long as the basis for granting an approval of this 
exemption remains valid, under provisions of 40 CFR 148.24. As required 
by 40 CFR 124.10, a public document was issued July 31, 1997, and 
closed on September 15, 1997. No comments were received. This decision 
constitutes final Agency action and there is no Administrative appeal.

DATES: This action is effective as of October 28,1997.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the modified petition and all pertinent 
information relating thereto are on file at the following location: 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Quality Protection 
Division, Source Water Protection Branch (6WQ-S), 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Dellinger, Chief, Ground Water/
UIC Section, EPA--Region 6, telephone (214) 665-7165.
Oscar Ramirez, Jr.,
Acting Director, Water Quality Protection Division (6WQ).
[FR Doc. 97-29387 Filed 11-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40638 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROY MOLINA, also known as José Roel Molina, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CR-46-2

-------------------- December 14, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Counsel for Roy Molina, the Federal Public Defender, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Molina has filed a response. Our independent review of the brief, the response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See id. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Exhibit 7.3 - PS&E CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST 

PS&E Certification Checklist

Tribe:

Agency with Jurisdiction over Facility:

Project Name:

Project Location:

Type of Work:

State:

County or Borough:

Action Item √

1. The project facility is included in the National Tribal Transportation Facility Inventory.

2. The project is on a FHWA-approved TTIP.

3. Public involvement has been completed in accordance with 25 CFR § 170.435 through

170.441.

4. There is a Tribal resolution or other authorized document (signed and dated by the

Tribal Government Leader) supporting the project.

5. Appropriate construction easements, maintenance and utility agreements have been

obtained in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property

Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 for fee lands and 25 CFR 169 for trust lands.

6. Cultural resources and environmental requirements have been met, that are listed in

the official Tribal Transportation Program Delivery Guide on the Federal Lands Highway 

– Office of Tribal Transportation Website at https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/

programs-tribal.

7. This PE&E package meets or exceeds applicable design, health and safety standards

according to 25 CFR § 170.454.

8. No design exceptions are required for the design or specifications in this PS&E.

9. For other than facilities under Tribal and BIA jurisdiction, the owner public authority

was provided an opportunity to review and comment on the Tribe’s PS&E package when it

was between 75 and 95 percent complete.

10. All applicable federal, state, and local permits (environmental, land use, etc.) have

been obtained, and the resulting relevant conditions/commitments have been

incorporated into the PS&E as appropriate.

Tribal Signature: Date:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY TUSWEET SMITH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 385 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of March, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

**FORM N-Q**

**QUARTERLY SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS OF REGISTERED**

**MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY**

**_______________________________**

Investment Company Act file number  811-5983

New Germany Fund, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154-0004

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (212) 454-7190

Date of fiscal year end:  12/31

Date of reporting period: 3/31/09

 

ITEM 1.  SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

 

**THE NEW GERMANY FUND**
exv10w32



 



EXHIBIT 10.32




NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED

MEETING OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE

DECEMBER 16, 1993


E X T R A C T


     RESOLVED, That the remuneration provided for in these resolutions shall be
paid quarterly, in arrears, in U.S. currency or, at the request of a Director,
in the Canadian dollar equivalent thereof;


     RESOLVED, That commencing January 1, 1994 each Director of Northern
Telecom Limited who ceases to hold office as such on or after January 1, 1994,
other than for reasons which in the opinion of the Board of Directors
constitutes misfeasance, shall be paid base retirement compensation by the
Corporation at the rate of 75 percent of US$27,500 or, of the Board retainer
fee payable when the Director so ceases to hold office as such, whichever is
greater, plus indexed retirement compensation at the rate of 56.25% of any
increment in the Board retainer fee payable from time to time by the
Corporation over the amount serving for computation of the Director’s base
retirement compensation;


     RESOLVED, That such retirement compensation be paid, during the lifetime
of such Director or their surviving spouse, for the period equal to the
duration of such Director’s tenure as a member of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation or ten (10) years, whichever may be the lesser; provided, however,
that such retirement compensation shall not be paid to any Director of the
Corporation who, immediately prior to the date on which such Director ceases to
hold office as such, was a salaried employee of the Corporation or of any of
its subsidiaries, or who was eligible or entitled to the payment of a monthly
pension or other retirement allowance under a pension plan or like arrangement
established or maintained by the Corporation or by any of its subsidiaries;


 






 




NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FEBRUARY 29, 1996


E X T R A C T


     RESOLVED, That effective January 1, 1996, any individual elected as a
Director of the Corporation for the first time shall not be entitled to be paid
any retirement compensation by the Corporation; and


     RESOLVED, That the resolutions with respect to remuneration previously
adopted by the Board of Directors are hereby repealed to the extent
inconsistent with the preceding resolutions; provided, for greater certainty,
that the resolutions adopted December 16, 1993 with respect to retirement
compensation payable to Directors of the Corporation shall continue to apply to
Directors elected prior to December 31, 1995.