alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60469-60470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-428-602]


Brass Sheet and Strip From Germany; Extension of Time Limit for 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Extension of time limit for antidumping duty administrative 
review of brass sheet and strip from Germany.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is extending 
the time limit for the preliminary results of the tenth antidumping 
duty administrative review of the antidumping order on brass sheet and 
strip from Germany. This review covers Wieland-Werke AG, a manufacturer 
and exporter of the subject merchandise, and the period of review March 
1, 1996 through February 28, 1997.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 10, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Killiam, Alain Letort, or John 
R. Kugelman, AD/CVD Enforcement Group III--Office 8, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington D.C. 
20230, telephone (202)

[[Page 60470]]

482-2704, 482-4243, or 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    The Department initiated this administrative review on April 24, 
1997 (62 FR 19988). Because it is not practicable to complete this 
review within the time limit mandated by section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act''), as amended by the Uruguay Round 
Agreements Act of 1994, the Department is extending the time limit for 
the preliminary results of the aforementioned review to March 31, 1998. 
See memorandum from Joseph A. Spetrini to Robert S. LaRussa, which is 
on file in Room B-099 at the Department's headquarters.
    This extension of time limit is in accordance with section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

    Dated: November 4, 1997.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 97-29625 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of income and consolidated balance sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000021212
<NAME> COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                      <C>               <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>            3-MOS             3-MOS     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        DEC-31-1998       DEC-31-1997<F1> 
<PERIOD-END>             MAR-31-1998       MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                        46,031            72,124
<SECURITIES>                  20,804               500
<RECEIVABLES>                 42,408            37,205
<ALLOWANCES>                   1,152             1,007
<INVENTORY>                   84,978            61,300        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             197,655           176,040        
<PP&E>                        92,540            73,104        
<DEPRECIATION>                36,732            30,664        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               274,605           241,828        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         60,538            50,483        
<BONDS>                       11,033            13,291                
<COMMON>                      71,889            70,904 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0                 0 
<PREFERRED>                        0                 0 
<OTHER-SE>                   124,452           100,578 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 274,605           241,828 
<SALES>                      175,637           158,106 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             175,637           158,106 
<CGS>                        152,261           137,771 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                168,102           152,109 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              (1,541)             (739)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  91                80  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               465               356  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                9,076             6,731  
<INCOME-TAX>                   2,777             2,317  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            6,299             4,419  
<DISCONTINUED>                     0                 0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0                 0  
<CHANGES>                          0                 0             
<NET-INCOME>                   6,299             4,419  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    .36               .26  
<EPS-DILUTED>                    .36               .25  
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### John B. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-88.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 7, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 30, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amended Annual Report of iMetrik M2M Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Michel St-Pierre, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 24th day of July, 2012.








MICHEL ST-PIERREMichel St-PierreChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****The national intelligencestrategy of the United States of America
 
2005 | 2009| 2014 | 2019
 
SuDocNumber:PREX 28.21:
ItemNumber:0857-T-16 (online)
CGPSystem Number:000871149
 
February21, 2020
 **
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1154-DR]


Idaho; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Idaho, (FEMA-1154-DR), dated January 4, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 22, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Idaho, is hereby amended to include the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
January 4, 1997:

    The Counties of Adams, Bonner, Boundary, Clearwater, Elmore, 
Latah, Nez Perce, Payette, Shoshone, Valley, and Washington for 
Hazard Mitigation Assistance and Categories C, D, E, F, and G under 
the Public Assistance program. Federal assistance to replace trees 
is not eligible. (These counties have already been designated for 
Individual Assistance and Categories A and B under the Public 
Assistance program.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-2975 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 3090-0023]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request Entitled Surplus Personal 
Property Mailing List Application

AGENCY: Property Management Division (FBP), GSA.

ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding reinstatement 
to a previously approved OMB clearance (3090-0023).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Office of Acquisition Policy has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and 
approve a reinstatement of a previously approved information collection 
requirement concerning Surplus Personal Property Mailing List. A 
request for public comments was published at 62 FR 43332, August 13, 
1997. No comments were received.

DATES: Comment Due Date: December 4, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect 
of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing 
this burden, should be submitted to: Edward Springer, GSA Desk Officer, 
Room 3235, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and to Marjorie Ashby, General 
Services Administration (MVP), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynne Price, (703) 308-0643.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Purpose

    The GSA is requesting the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to 
reinstate information collection, 3090-0023, concerning Surplus 
Personal Property Mailing List. The GSA Form 2170 is completed by 
persons who wish to have their names placed on the Surplus Personal 
Property Mailing List maintained by GSA Regional Sales Offices. Mailing 
labels are produced based on the type of property and geographical area 
indicated by the prospective bidder on the mailing list application.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 35,000; annual responses: 35,000; average hours per 
response: .083; burden hours: 2905.

Copy of Proposals

    A copy of this proposal may be obtained from the GSA Acquisition 
Policy Division (MVP), Room 4011, GSA Building, 1800 F Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20405, or by telephoning (202) 501-3822, or by faxing 
your request to (202) 501-3341.

    Dated: October 28, 1997.
Ida M. Ustad,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 97-29060 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-M
Exhibit 11

                             RANGER INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       (formerly Coleco Industries, Inc.)

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                  (Unaudited - See Accountants' Review Report)

                 for the quarters ended March 31, 1997 and 1996

                                   ----------

                                                        1997         1996
                                                    -----------   -----------
Primary:

   Net loss                                         $   (49,017)  $   (35,628)

   Average common shares outstanding                  4,000,000     4,000,000

   Primary loss per share                           $      (.01)  $      (.01)


Fully diluted:

   Net loss                                         $   (49,017)  $   (35,628)

   Average common shares outstanding                  4,000,000     4,000,000

   Fully-diluted loss per share                     $      (.01)  $      (.01)
#### TROPIC AIR CONDITIONING, a Division of Appliance Masters, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CLIMAT-EASE, INC., a Florida corporation, a subsidiary of Molecular Research, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-745.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 9, 1973.

Malcolm H. Friedman of Law Offices of Malcolm H. Friedman, Coral Gables, for appellant.

John T. Christiansen of Sales, Metzger & Christiansen, Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on the authority of Home News Publishing Co. v. U-M Publishing, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 246 So.2d 117.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., and FERRIS, JOHN G., Associate Judge, concur.
#### Cannie Belle LaBARREARE, Individually and as Administrator v. Bobby Lee LAMBERT et al.

No. 47231.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 15, 1973.

Townsend & McWilliams, Drew, for appellant.

Campbell, DeLong, Keady, Robertson & Hagwood, Greenville, Lyon, Crosthwait & Terney, Indianola, for appellees.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Sunflower County; Arthur B. Clark, Jr., Judge.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and SMITH, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 15
----------

Independent Accountants' Report
-------------------------------


Ranger Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
St. Petersburg, Florida

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Ranger
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001, and the related
condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000 and for the period from inception
through September 30, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for them
to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


                                      /s/ Aidman, Piser & Company, P.A.
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      Aidman, Piser & Company, P.A.

November 14, 2001
Tampa, Florida
|    |                                                                                                                                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Towers Watson & Co. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |
|                    |
| Date: October 2, 2015   |
|                    |
| /s/ John J. Haley  |
| John J. Haley           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August      5, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Charles N.      Eldred                                 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   | Charles      N. Eldred                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|                                 |   | Executive      Vice President and                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|                                 |   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|                                 |   | Public      Service Company of New Mexico                                                                                                                                                                                       |

----
#### George WEBSTER, Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., a corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-428.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 7, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Roger F. Dykes, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 08 -0 00 56 -C V

______________________________ I N THE MATT ER OF TH E MARRIAGE OF DONALD M. HOLDER AND ROSEMARY A. HOL DER

On Appea l from the County Court at L aw Cass County , Texas Trial Court No. CCL -07-D- 049

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r an d M o s e l e y , JJ. Me mor and

um O pin ion

by Chi e f Jus tic e Mo rriss2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Do na ld M . H old e r, the so le a pp e lla nt in thi s c a se , h a s f

ile d a mot ion se e kin gto d ism iss his appea l. Pursuant to Rul e 42.1 of the Texas Rules of Appe llate Proce dure, his motion is gra nted. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1. We d ism iss the a

pp e a l.

J o s hR
. M o r r i s s , III Chief J ustice Date Submitted: May 29, 2008 Date D ecide d: May 30, 2008
*Pursuant to 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 19, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 05-40504 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROBERT RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(USDC No. 2:04-CR-677-ALL) Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Robert Ramirez appeals his jury conviction for two counts of transporting illegal aliens within the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. He argues that the government failed to present sufficient evidence that he knowingly transported illegal aliens in the trailer of his truck. Although Ramirez moved for judgment of acquittal at the close of the government’s case, he did not renew his motion after presenting his defense or at the close of all evidence at trial. Thus, Ramirez’s sufficiency of the evidence challenge is reviewed only for a manifest miscarriage of justice. United States v. Avants , 367 F.3d 433, 449 (5th Cir.2

2004). To find a miscarriage of justice, the court must find that the record is “devoid of evidence of guilt or the evidence must be so tenuous that a conviction is shocking.” Id. Here, the evidence shows that Ramirez drove an 18-wheel tractor-trailer truck to the border checkpoint in Falfurrias, Texas, with twenty four illegal aliens locked in the otherwise empty trailer. Ramirez recognizes in his brief that the evidence showed that the lock on the trailer was his. Further, Ramirez was visibly nervous as he communicated with Border Patrol agents at the checkpoint. Ramirez also provided inconsistent statements to the agents regarding his itinerary, and a rational jury could have found his explanation for the aliens’ presence implausible. In short, Ramirez has not shown that the record is “devoid of evidence of guilt” or “so tenuous that a conviction is shocking.” Id. AFFIRMED.
#### Jorge MONZON et al., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-757.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.