alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1447

HELEN TESFAYE,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the

United States,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A97-925-825)

Submitted: November 3, 2006 Decided: December 1, 2006

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allan Ebert, LAW OFFICES OF ALLAN EBERT, Washington, D.C., for

Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Larry D.

Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Helen Tesfaye, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s

order denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture and denying her

motion to reopen.

To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility

for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was

so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the

requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.

478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and

conclude that Tesfaye fails to show that the evidence compels a

contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that she

seeks.

Additionally, we uphold the immigration judge’s denial of

Tesfaye’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden

of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even

though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who

is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding

of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft, 378

F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Tesfaye fails to show that

she is eligible for asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for

withholding of removal. 
- 3 -

We also find that Tesfaye fails to meet the standard for

relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such

relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than

not that he or he would be tortured if removed to the proposed

country of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2004). We find

that Tesfaye fails to make the requisite showing.

Finally, we have reviewed the record and the Board’s

order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in

denying Tesfaye’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a)

(2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the

reasons stated by the Board. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
|                                |
|--------------------------------|
|                                |  |  |
| Subsidiary                     | Ownership | Jurisdiction |
| First Community Financial Bank | Wholly-owned subsidiary of First Community Financial Partners, Inc. | Illinois |
| First Community OREO, LLC      | Wholly-owned subsidiary of First Community Financial Partners, Inc. | Illinois |
| First Community OREO III, LLC  | Wholly-owned subsidiary of First Community Financial Partners, Inc. | Illinois |
| FCBP OREO, LLC                 | Wholly-owned subsidiary of First Community Financial Partners, Inc. | Illinois |
| FCB Homer OREO, LLC            | Wholly-owned subsidiary of First Community Financial Partners, Inc. | Illinois |
Steve Rhode

8301 Wycombe Ridge Way

Wake Forest, NC 27587

steve@psflight.org

RE: Docket No. FAA-2014-0799

Please accept the submission of the following clarifications and information to accompany my 

previously submitted Section 333 exemption request. It appears in my supplemental information 

I just filed I may not have been specifically clear on the following point.

I stated in my information filed today, “Any newer UAS obtained will meet or exceed the 

standards listed in this exemption request.”

What I should have said was “Any newer UAS obtained will meet or exceed the standards listed 

in this exemption request but will not exceed 55 pounds fully loaded and will not fly at a speed 

over 50 knots.”

###
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ARMANDO MARTINEZ

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 046

- C R

Appeal from the

409 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20160D04459 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third m otion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until October 25 , 201 9

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE APPELLANT ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Feli x Valenzuela

, the Appellant ’s attorney, prepare

the Appellant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before October 25 , 2019

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 24 th day of September , 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM
#### Ronald Barry MAULDIN, as Administrator of the Estates of Dee Whit Mauldin and Fodie May Mauldin, Deceased, Appellant, v. Perry Carl STOTLEMYER, Appellee.

No. 69-403.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 16, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Parker L. McDonald, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly report of Bio Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:   August
5, 2008


By:
            /s/
      David KoosDavid
      KoosActing
      Chief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bio
Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. and will be retained by Bio Matrix Scientific
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 32005R1800 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005R1800

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1800/2005 of 28 October 2005 determining the world market price for unginned cotton **

*
Official Journal L 288 , 29/10/2005 P. 0050 - 0050 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1800/2005

of 28 October 2005

determining the world market price for unginned cotton

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Protocol 4 on cotton, annexed to the Act of Accession of Greece, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2001 [1],

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 of 22 May 2001 on production aid for cotton [2], and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001, a world market price for unginned cotton is to be determined periodically from the price for ginned cotton recorded on the world market and by reference to the historical relationship between the price recorded for ginned cotton and that calculated for unginned cotton. That historical relationship has been established in Article 2(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1591/2001 of 2 August 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying the cotton aid scheme [3]. Where the world market price cannot be determined in this way, it is to be based on the most recent price determined.

(2) In accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001, the world market price for unginned cotton is to be determined in respect of a product of specific characteristics and by reference to the most favourable offers and quotations on the world market among those considered representative of the real market trend. To that end, an average is to be calculated of offers and quotations recorded on one or more European exchanges for a product delivered cif to a port in the Community and coming from the various supplier countries considered the most representative in terms of international trade. However, there is provision for adjusting the criteria for determining the world market price for ginned cotton to reflect differences justified by the quality of the product delivered and the offers and quotations concerned. Those adjustments are specified in Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1591/2001.

(3) The application of the above criteria gives the world market price for unginned cotton determined hereinafter,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The world price for unginned cotton as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 is hereby determined as equalling 21,509 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. Silva Rodríguez

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

[1] OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 1.

[2] OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 3.

[3] OJ L 210, 3.8.2001, p. 10. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1486/2002 (OJ L 223, 20.8.2002, p. 3).

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.31



                                      ESS



To:     Fred Chan

From:   Bo Ericsson

Date:   November 26, 1997

Re:     EXIT AGREEMENT



1.  Ericsson's last date of full time employment will be Dec 12 1997.
    Ericsson will serve as a consultant, reporting to Nicholas Aretakis, on a
    part time basis for an additional four weeks (max 20 hours a week).
    Ericsson's salary will end on Dec 12.

2.  Ericsson's primary responsibility during his remaining time with ESS
    will be a) generating candidates for the open VP marketing position, b)
    transfer of the marketing organization to Nicholas Aretakis and c)
    developing a business plan for ESS' personal computer business

3.  On Dec 12 1997, ESS will pay Ericsson his 1997 bonus of 37.5K plus 60K
    in severance payment, plus remaining salary balance. Upon receipt on
    Dec 12 of these payments, ESS will have fulfilled all of its obligations
    to Ericsson, per Ericsson's amended employment agreement, and Ericsson
    will have no further claims against ESS.




/s/ Fred Chan                             /s/ Bo Ericsson
-------------------------                 -------------------------
Fred Chan, CEO                            Bo Ericsson
HHF California Date: October 1, 2018

A1

SCHEDULE A

BASIC INFORMATION

Eligible Entity Information:

Name of the Eligible Entity: CalHFA Mortgage Assistance 

Corporation

Corporate or other organizational form: Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation 

Jurisdiction of organization: California

Notice Information:

HFA Information:

Name of HFA: California Housing Finance Agency

Organizational form: Agency of the State of California

Date of Application: April 16, 2010

Date of Action Plan: September 1, 2010 

Notice Information:

Program Participation Cap: $2,360,253,221.00 

Portion of Program Participation Cap

Representing Original HHF Funds: $699,600,000.00

Portion of Program Participation Cap

Representing Unemployment HHF Funds: $476,257,070.00

Rounds 1-4 Funding Allocation: $1,975,334,096.00

Round 5 Funding Allocation: $384,919,125.00

Program Funds: $2,118,434,611.41

Permitted Expenses: $241,818,609.59

Closing Date: June 23, 2010

First Amendment Date: September 23, 2010
HHF California Date: October 1, 2018

A2

Second Amendment Date: September 29, 2010

Third Amendment Date: December 16, 2010

Fourth Amendment Date: March 31, 2011

Fifth Amendment Date: August 3, 2011

Sixth Amendment Date: October 28, 2011

Seventh Amendment Date: May 3, 2012

Eighth Amendment Date: July 17, 2012

Ninth Amendment Date: December 14, 2012

Tenth Amendment Date: June 6, 2013

Eleventh Amendment Date: September 20, 2013

Twelfth Amendment Date: February 27, 2014

Thirteenth Amendment Date: April 11, 2014

Fourteenth Amendment Date: September 3, 2014

Fifteenth Amendment Date: November 13, 2014

Sixteenth Amendment Date: March 6, 2015

Seventeenth Amendment Date: September 29, 2015

Eighteenth Amendment Date: December 18, 2015

Nineteenth Amendment Date: April 1, 2016

Twentieth Amendment Date: June 1, 2016

Twenty-First Amendment Date: August 31, 2016

Eligible Entity Depository Account Information: See account information set forth in the 

Depository Account Control Agreement 

between Treasury and Eligible Entity 

regarding the HHF Program
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JEAN ARRISSON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1015

[ August 12, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Kirk C. Volker , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502007CF014369DXXXMB

.

Jean Arrisson, Indiantown, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessica L.

Underwood, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, G ERBE R and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit (j)




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------



We hereby consent to the reference to us in this  Registration  Statement of DWS
RREEF  Global  Infrastructure  Fund on Form N-1A under the heading  "Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm".

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
June 18, 2008
#### H. Lyn MacDONALD, formerly H. Lyn O’Brien, Appellant, v. Phyllis PRICE, Appellee.

No. 71-504.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 27, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   November 2, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Thomas G. Sategna          |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                                         |   | Thomas G. Sategna              |
|                                         |   | Vice President, Controller     |
|                                         |   | Texas-New Mexico Power Company |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CEO CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd. (“Advantage”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andy J. Mah, Chief Executive Officer of
Advantage, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | 2. | The
                                                                                        information contained in the Report fairly
                                                                                        presents, in all material respects, the
                                                                                        financial condition and results of operations
                                                                                        of Advantage.







|Date:  March 23, 2012 | /s/ Andy J. Mah                      
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                      | Andy J. Mah                          
|                      | President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                 EXHIBIT 10m4


Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements, among Fortune Brands,
Inc. ("Fortune") and each of the following persons, to the Agreement
constituting Exhibit 10m3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fortune for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                      Name
                                      ----

                                  Mark Hausberg
                                  Mark A. Roche
#### James PENSON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50022.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 30, 1977.

Richard E. Burdine, Columbus, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Catherine W. Underwood, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Calhoun County; William R. Lamb, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

REVERSED AND APPELLANT DISCHARGED.

PATTERSON, C. J., INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER and BROOM, JJ., concur.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-430 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Cooperation 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Signed at Washington and Seoul April 30, 2009 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

 Defense: Cooperation 

 Memorandum of understanding signed 

 at Washington and Seoul April 30, 2009; 

 Entered into force April 30, 2009.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-240-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

January 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 29, 1997, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff 
sheets, with an effective date of March 1, 1997:

Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 11A
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 11B
Twenty-Second Revised Sheet No. 12

    Texas Gas states that the revised tariff sheets are being filed in 
compliance with Section 17.3 (n) and (0) of Texas Gas's FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1 and reflect the removal of the Cash-
Out Revenue Adjustment negative surcharge which expires February 28, 
1997. The impact of this removal is to increase commodity rates by 
$.0026 applicable to FT and IT Rate Schedules effective March 1, 1997.
    Texas Gas states that copies of this filing have been served upon 
Texas Gas's jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to the 
proceeding must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2916 Filed 2-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### R. O. PRIEST, Sub Tropic Nurseries, Inc., a Florida corporation, G. C. Baker, Jr., and Dorothy Baker, his wife, Appellants, v. Frank BOBRYTZKE and John H. Adams, Appellees.

No. 70-49.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 5, 1970.

B. F. Paty, Jr., of Paty, Downey, Lewis & Daves, Palm Beach, for appellants.

Sam D. Phillips, Jr., of Phillips & Babbitt, West Palm Beach, for appellee Bob-rytzke.

PER CURIAM.

The record reflects adequate competent evidence to support a finding of fiduciary relationship. Affirmed on authority of Prescott v. Kreher, Fla.App.1960, 123 So.2d *135721, and Quinn v. Phipps, 1927, 93 Fla. 805, 113 So. 419, 54 A.L.R. 1173.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.