alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jonathan B. Hill

+1 202 776 2725

jhill@cooley.com

VIA EMAIL TRANSMISSION

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

April 15, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: FAA Docket 2015-0424-0001 (Integrated Media Technology)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Enclosed for inclusion in the referenced docket is a confidential filing made on behalf of 

Integrated Media Technology of its motion picture and television operations manual. It is 

requested that this manual not be included in the public record and it be maintained as 

confidential as it is not distributed to the public by Integrated Media Technology. It contains 

proprietary and confidential business information. 

Should you have any questions concerning this, please contact the undersigned.

Sincerely yours,

Jonathan B. Hill

Counsel for Integrated Media Technology

Encl.

cc: James Williams

Robert Pappas

Thuy Cooper 

Dean Griffith, Esq. 

Jake Troutman
#### David James JACKSON, Petitioner, v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Adult Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-643.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 6, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### FASHION MART BUILDING, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. HERMAN A. THOMAS, INC., etc., Respondent.

No. 39783.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 30, 1970.

Rehearing Denied July 17, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 234 So.2d 731.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
CPP Lending Report

NAME OF INSTITUTION

(Including Holding Company Where Applicable) Person to be contacted regarding this report:

The Harbor Bank of Maryland (Harbor 

Bankshares Corporation)

Joseph Haskins, Jr.

UST Sequence Number: 1273

City: Baltimore

State: Maryland

RSSD:

(for Bank Holding Companies)

2008130

Holding Company Docket Number:

(for Thrift Holding Companies)

n/a

FDIC Certificate Number:

(for Depository Institutions)

24015

Loan Activity For: June, 2018

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance (Thousands $) 65,823

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance Key

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance Comment

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance (Thousands$) 149,459

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance Key

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance Comment

Total Outstanding Balance (Thousands $) 215,282

Total Outstanding Balance Key

Total Outstanding Balance Comment

General Market Commentary
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Tasco  International  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Adrienne Humphries, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this  certification as of the
7th day of May 2004.


/s/ Adrienne Humphries
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
#### John H. STURGES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-143.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 29, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                         3,543
<SECURITIES>                                   25,626
<RECEIVABLES>                                  30,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,422
<INVENTORY>                                    26,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,605
<PP&E>                                         33,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                 17,864
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          49,208
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       63,151
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    18,147
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,712
<SALES>                                        148,779
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,779
<CGS>                                          64,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,055
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                23,085
<INCOME-TAX>                                   8,147
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,938
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,938
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .68


</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of American United Gold Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, David Uppal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 18th day of August, 2008.

BY:
DAVID UPPAL                        David  Uppal, Principal Executive Officer **
#### Nathaniel HEATH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44352.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 22, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 281 So.2d 623.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3470 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to permit a State 

to include as part of the mail voter registration form a requirement 

that applicants provide proof of citizenship, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2023 

Mrs. BRITT (for herself, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. CRUZ, Mrs. 

CAPITO, Mr. WICKER, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, and Mr. HAGERTY) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to 

permit a State to include as part of the mail voter 

registration form a requirement that applicants provide 

proof of citizenship, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Citizen Ballot Protec5 tion Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3470 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONTENTS OF STATE MAIL VOTER REGISTRATION 

2 FORM. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6(a) of the National Voter 

4 Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20505(a)) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘Federal Election Commis8 sion’’ and inserting ‘‘Election Assistance Com9 mission’’; and 

10 (B) by inserting ‘‘, except that a State 

11 may, in addition to the criteria stated in section 

12 9(b), require that an applicant provide proof 

13 that the applicant is a citizen of the United 

14 States’’ after ‘‘elections for Federal office’’; and 

15 (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘and such 

16 form may include a requirement that the applicant 

17 provide proof that the applicant is a citizen of the 

18 United States’’ after ‘‘elections for Federal office’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect 

20 on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3768 

To extend and modify the transportation grant program of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 7), 2024 

Mr. CRAMER (for himself and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the transportation grant program of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Rural Vet5 erans Access to Healthcare Services Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3768 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF TRANSPOR2 TATION GRANT PROGRAM OF DEPARTMENT 

3 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 Section 307 of the Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus 

5 Health Services Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–163; 38 

6 U.S.C. 1710 note) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)— 

8 (A) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end 

9 the following new subparagraphs: 

10 ‘‘(C) Tribal organizations. 

11 ‘‘(D) Native Hawaiian organizations.’’; and 

12 (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘State 

13 veterans service agency or veterans service or14 ganization awarded’’ and inserting ‘‘recipient 

15 of’’; 

16 (2) in subsection (c)— 

17 (A) by redesignating paragraph (2) as 

18 paragraph (4); and 

19 (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the 

20 following new paragraphs: 

21 ‘‘(2) NATIVE HAWAIIAN ORGANIZATION.—The 

22 term ‘Native Hawaiian organization’ has the mean23 ing given that term in section 6207 of the Elemen24 tary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 

25 U.S.C. 7517). 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3768 IS

1 ‘‘(3) TRIBAL ORGANIZATION.—The term ‘Tribal 

2 organization’ has the meaning given that term in 

3 section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Edu4 cation Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304).’’; and 

5 (3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘$3,000,000 

6 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2022’’ and in7 serting ‘‘such sums as may be necessary for each of 

8 fiscal years 2024 through 2028’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES FRANKLIN MURDOCH, Jr., 

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 05-55665

v. D.C. No.

ROY CASTRO, Warden; BILL  CV-99-06900-

LOCKYER, Attorney General, RSWL

Attorney General of the State of ORDER California,

Respondents-Appellees. 

Filed October 9, 2008

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: 

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it

is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit

Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

14565
PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
U.S. Department Of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 

 400 Seventh St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 

 October 27, 1989  Refer to:  HNG-14/SS-14  Mr. Mark S. Granger Sign Post Sales Manager Marion Steel Company 912 Cheney Avenue Marion, Ohio 43302  Dear Mr. Granger:  In your August 23 and October 17 letters to Mr. James H. Hatton, Jr. you requested assurance that the minor changes that have been made in the Minute Man breakaway device (MMB-1), which you market for use with your flanged-channel sign support posts, meet Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requirements for breakaway devices.  (Copies of drawings MMB-1, MMB-1-2, and MMB-1-3 of the revised device dated or last revised 10-13-89, 8-24-89, and 10-12-88, respectively, are enclosed)  After comparing the drawings of the revised device with drawings of the previously tested model, which we indicated in our March 10, 1988, letter to Mr. Albert M. Moreno, Sr., of Minute man Anchors, Inc., would be acceptable on Federal-aid highway projects, we have concluded the modifications to the MMB-1 will have an insignificant effect  on its breakaway characteristics.  Therefore, the MMB-1, as described in the enclosed drawings, is acceptable as a replacement for the previously accepted version of the device.         Sincerely yours,          L. A. Staron, Chief        Federal-Aid and Design Division  Enclosures
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tasco International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Adrienne Humphries, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
2nd day of May 2005.


/s/ Adrienne Humphreys
------------------------------
Adrienne Humphreys
Chief Financial Officer
#### Albert LANDRY et al. v. Edith P. DENT et al.

No. 11939.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Feb. 21, 1978.

Writ Refused March 27, 1978.

Gordon M. White, Baton Rouge, for appellants.

Kenneth Barnette, H. Payne Breazeale, Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, Baton Rouge, for Dent & St. Paul.

Horace C. Lane, Baton Rouge, for U. S. F. & G.

Before LOTTINGER, EDWARDS and PONDER, JJ.

LOTTINGER, Judge:

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Ex proprio motu this Court issued a show cause order as to why this appeal should not be dismissed for. an untimely filing of the appeal bond.

After a trial on the merits, and for oral reasons, judgment was rendered in open court on June 1, 1977 dismissing plaintiffs’ suit, and signed on June 3, 1977. This case not having been taken under .advisement, and June 3 being a Friday, the delay for applying for a new trial commenced to run on June 6, 1977. LSA-C.C.P. art. 1913 and 1974.

*674Plaintiffs filed their motion for appeal on July 20, 1977, and the appeal bond on September 2, 1977.

Plaintiffs claim that their untimely filing of the appeal bond was through no fault of their own but the negligence of the clerk’s office in failing to send notice of appeal before the sixty day time limitation.

LSA-C.C.P. art. 2121 provides that after an order of appeal is granted “the clerk of court shall mail a notice of appeal *to counsel of record of all other parties,*to the respective appellate court) and to other parties not represented by counsel. The failure of the clerk to mail the notice does not affect the validity of the appeal.” There is no requirement that the clerk of court send notice of appeal to the party that has appealed. Thus, any failure of the clerk to send the notice of appeal cannot act as an excuse for the late filing of an appeal bond.

The filing of the appeal bond on September 2, 1977 was untimely which is fatal to this appeal necessitating its dismissal. LSA-C.C.P. art. 2087; *Harris v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co.,*345 So.2d 1205.(La.App. 1st Cir. 1977).

Plaintiffs also argue that LSA-C. C.P. art. 2124, as amended by Act No. 176 of 1977, Regular Session, eliminating the need for posting a devolutive appeal bond, should be retroactively applied making their untimely filing of the bond a moot issue. We disagree.

Act No. 176 of the 1977, Regular Session, in part provides:

> “Section 4. The effective date of this Act is January 1, 1978; the provisions hereof shall apply to all appeals in which the order of appeal is granted on or after the effective date hereof.”

The language clearly makes the application of the Act prospective and not retrospective.

Therefore for the above and foregoing reasons this appeal is dismissed at appellants’ costs.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

**Waterfowl Identification in the Central Flyway**

##       Whooping Crane    

----

****

 Snowy white and stands more than four feet tall. In flight, its black wingtips     are visible, its neck is extended and its long dark legs extend beyond the     tail. It has a wingspan of 7 1/2 feet. Whoopers usually are found in small     groups of six or seven or fewer.   

----

Previous Section
Return to Contents
Next Section

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/waterfwl/whooping.htm		Page Contact Information: Webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 03-Aug-2006 11:32:16 EDT		Reston, VA [vaww54]
**Certification of Chief Executive and Financial Officer of**

**Avicenna Global Corp. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

** **

I, Ummer Veedu, certify that:

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Avicenna Global Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ummer Veedu, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| 1.  

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

Date:  March 15, 2011
                                                                                                   
/s/ Ummer Veedu

Ummer Veedu

Chief Executive Officer and 

Chief Financial Officer |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Robert Earl STORY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43914.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 7, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 276 So.2d 857.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

McCAIN, J., dissents.
#### John Matthew WEEKS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-817.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 12, 1970.

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Lewis Kimler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

See Halliday v. United States, 394 U.S. 831, 89 S.Ct. 1498, 23 L.Ed.2d 16 (1969).
Exhibit 32.1

NUVELO, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Ted W. Love, Chief Executive Officer of Nuvelo, Inc. (the
Company), and H. Ward Wolff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Annual Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 28th day of February, 2007.



|                                                              |  |                                                                         
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    TED W.
LOVE                                            |  | /s/    H. Ward Wolff                                                    
|Ted W. Love Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |  | H. Ward Wolff Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Nuvelo, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of
the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

Date: February 28, 2007
No. 00-7137.

#### In re Page.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.