alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ROBERT KAPER, * No. 13-504V

* Special Master Christian J. Moran

Petitioner, *

* Filed: September 30, 2014

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * in the amount to which

* respondent does not object.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol, Schwartz, et al., Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner; 

Jennifer L. Reynaud, U. S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS1

On September 15, 2014, petitioner filed a stipulation of fact concerning final 

attorneys’ fees and costs in the above-captioned matter. Previously, petitioner 

informally submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent 

for review. Upon review of petitioner’s application, respondent raised objections 

to certain items. Based on subsequent discussions, petitioner amended his

application to request $24,250.00, an amount to which respondent does not object. 

The Court awards this amount.

On June 24, 2013, Robert Kaper filed a petition for compensation alleging 

that the influenza vaccine, which he received on November 9, 2011, caused him to 

suffer Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”).2Petitioner received compensation 

based upon the parties’ stipulation. Decision, issued Aug. 20, 2014. Because 

 

1 The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), 

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other 

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special 

master will appear in the document posted on the website.

2 The petition identifies the date of vaccination as November 10, 2011, but the medical 

records confirm that November 9, 2011, is the correct date of vaccination.
2

petitioner received compensation, he is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and 

costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). 

Petitioner seeks a total of $24,250.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs for his

counsel. Additionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, petitioner states 

that he did not incur any out-of-pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this 

claim. Respondent has no objection to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees 

and costs. 

After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $24,250.00 in the form of a check made payable to 

petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Lawrence R. Cohan, for attorneys’ 

fees and other litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).

The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this 

matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes, at (202) 357-

6353.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5781-5782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2213]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Texas Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Texas Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene by 
conference call at 10 a.m. and adjourn at approximately 12 noon on 
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 2300 E. University Drive, Denton, TX, 
76206. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the Committee's civil 
rights project on human trafficking.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the

[[Page 5782]]

comments must be received in the regional office by March 23, 2011. The 
address is 300 N. Los Angeles St., Suite 2010, Los Angeles, California 
90012. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments or who desire 
additional information should contact Angelica Trevino, Administrative 
Assistant, at (213) 894-3437 or (800) 877-8339 for individuals who are 
deaf, hearing impaired, and/or have speech disabilities or by e-mail 
to: atrevino@usccr.gov.
    Hearing-impaired persons who wish to submit written comments and 
require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Western Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, January 27, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-2213 Filed 2-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.31 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Treaty Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and FINLAND 

Signed at Brussels December 16, 2004 

with 

Annex 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 FINLAND 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Treaty signed at Brussels December 16, 2004; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-13, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-13, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Diplomatic Notes at Helsinki 

 April 29 and May 28 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010. 

With annex.
#### Poppy K. CHIMERAKIS and James Chimerakis, Appellants, v. Ann E. EVANS, Appellee.

No. 67-947.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 20, 1969.

Kelner & Lewis, Miami, for appellants.

Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl and Edward J. Atkins, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ., and SPECTOR, SAM, Associate Judge.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on August 13, 1968 (219 So. 2d 446) affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit for Dade County. Florida, in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS on review of this court’s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court *439of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed April 16, 1969 (221 So.2d 735) and mandate dated May 2, 1969, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment of affirmance and remanded the cause;

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the (no mandate issued) opinion and judgment of this court filed August 13, 1968 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the judgment of the circuit court appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).
# L_2005300EN.01005101.xml

| 17.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 300/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 300/51

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1879/2005

of 16 November 2005

amending the rates of refunds applicable to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular Article 27(5)(a) and (15) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The rates of the refunds applicable from 28 October 2005 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1764/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The rates of the refunds applicable from 28 October 2005 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1764/2005 (2).

| (2) | It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 1764/2005 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 1764/2005 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1764/2005 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 November 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 November 2005.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 285, 28.10.2005, p. 21.

2

---

ANNEX

Rates of refunds applicable from 17 November 2005 to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

| CN code | Description | Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| In case of advance fixing of refunds | Other |
| 1701 99 10 | White sugar | 35,54 | 35,54 |

CN code

Description

Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg

In case of advance fixing of refunds

Other

1701 99 10

White sugar

35,54

35,54

---

(1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

---
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I,Ronald Rowan, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Monarch Casino &Resort, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.               The Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /S/ RONALD ROWAN                       |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |
| March 13,  2009                   |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT I 

SAMPLE COMPENSATION STRUCTURE 

CONSISTENT WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST STANDARD 

Example: Covered Employee with a total compensation package of $3,000,000. 

• Base salary. 

 Cash: The Covered Employee receives a total of $400,000 in cash salary. 

 Stock Salary: The Covered Employee receives $150,000 in stock salary, 

which vests immediately but may not be transferred prior to the first 

anniversary of the date it is earned. 

• Incentive Compensation. The Covered Employee may also receive $2,450,000 in 

incentive compensation as follows: 

 Cash Incentive: $950,000. 

• $475,000 immediately payable; and 

• $475,000 paid at least one year from the grant date. 

 Stock incentive: $1,500,000

• The entire amount may not be sold or transferred prior to the third 

anniversary of the grant date. 

• Total compensation. Covered Employee’s total compensation is $3,000,000, with 45% 

of the total delivered in cash and 55% delivered in stock (50% delivered short term and 

50% delivered long term). 

5%

13%

32%

50%

Cash Salary

Stock Salary - 1 year after grant

Stock Incentive-Not payable until the 3rd

Year

Cash Incentive-50% immediately, 50%

one year later

21%

50%

29%

Amounts payable in the current year

Amounts payable in the 2nd year

Amounts payable in 3+ years

 Note 1: This Exhibit does not include amounts payable pursuant to legally binding rights under valid employment 

contracts, see 31 C.F.R. § 30.10(e)(2).

Breakdown of Total Direct Compensation Short Term vs. Long Term
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EDITH ROMAN AND ALEJANDRO

HERNANDEZ,

Appellants,

v.

JOY HALVERSON,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00241

- CV

Appeal from the

205th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2016DCV1580)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of th e court below. It appearing to this Court that

Appellants are indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes no other order with respect

thereto. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and McClure, Senior Judge

McClure, Senior Judge (Sitting by Assignment)
#### Bobbie Gene DUNN v. GLEN D. LOWE CO. et al.

No. 60290.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1977.

In re: Glen D. Lowe Co., et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of LaSalle. 346 So.2d 1337.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
#### Forney B. STAFFORD, Appellant, v. Constance E. STAFFORD, Appellee.

Nos. 77-234, 77-1146.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 11, 1978.

Rehearings Denied Sept. 7, 1978.

*769Edward C. Vining, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Snyder, Young, Stern, Barrett & Tan-nenbaum and Burton Young and William L. Rogers, North Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Herzog v. Herzog,*346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); *Shaw v. Shaw,*334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); *Koeppel v. Koeppel,*351 So.2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Pfohl v. Pfohl,*345 So.2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Stafford v. Stafford,*294 So.2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); *Steinhauer v. Steinhauer,*252 So.2d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).
EXHIBIT 32 – CFO Certification








ROYAL INVEST INTERNATIONAL CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADDED BY


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Invest International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q and Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nathan Lapkin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





By: /s/ Nathan Lapkin


Nathan Lapkin


Chief Financial Officer





May 24, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
February 11, 2013

Memorandum to the Montana Regional Haze FIP File Docket ID # EPA - R08 - OAR - 2011 - 0851 Subject: Conservation Group Comments , Availability of DVD From: Gail Fallon, Environmental Engineer

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8 We are including this memorandum in the docket after the promulgation of our final rule to clarify the availability of a DVD that we received with comments from the Montana Environmental Information Center, the National Parks Conservation Association and t he Sierra Club. These comments were submitted via an Earthjustice cover letter dated June 18, 2012 (Attachment 5 to EPA - R08 - OAR - 2011 - 0851 - 0187) . The collection of voluminous exhibits on the DVD is included in the Docket for this rulemaking and is available from the Region upon request.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

**FORM N-PX**

**ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF**

**DWS EAFE Equity Index Fund and DWS US Bond Index Fund**

**Each a Series of DWS Advisor Funds II**

Investment Company Act file number  811-07347

DWS Advisor Funds II

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

John Millette

Secretary

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA  02106-3106

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  617-295-1000

Date of fiscal year end:  12/31

Date of reporting period:  7/1/07-6/30/08

Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.

 
```

******************************* FORM N-Px REPORT *******************************

ICA File Number: 811-07347
Reporting Period: 07/01/2007 - 06/30/2008
DWS Advisor Funds II

======================= A      DWS U.S. BOND INDEX FUND ========================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND

====================== B      DWS EAFE EQUITY INDEX FUND =======================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND

========== END NPX REPORT
```

 

----
#### Jimmy BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. K-309.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

April 15, 1969.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Ralph W. Nimmons, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James Robert Yon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### Joseph Kenneth CORMIER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44668.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 21, 1974.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

MS 57 County Road 961 Bridge 

Replacement Bridge Replacement

US Army Corps of 

Engineers - Tenn 

Tombigbee Project (Crow's 

Neck Access)

Tishomingo 

County Tishomingo 2021

MS 59 Smith County 330(10)B Bridge 

Replacement Bridge Replacement US Forest Service - Bienville National Forest Smith County Smith 2021

MS 69 Bourke Road Bridge 

Replacement Bridge Replacement

US Fish & Wildlife Service - 

St. Catherine's Creek 

National Wildlife Refuge

Adams County Adams 2021-

2022

MS 78 Dowling Bayou Bridge 

Replacement Bridge Replacement US Forest Service - Delta National Forest Sharkey County Sharkey 2022

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Mississippi Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Mississippi FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Mississippi Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2020-2022

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The Mississippi PDC does not have a firm date for the next Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please bookmark our webpage to watch for

future Calls for Projects in your state. https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/flap/

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
No. 9988.

#### The New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Co. *v.*McDowell.

(Decided December 18, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Ashtabula County.

*Mr. John F. Clarke*and *Messrs. Hoyt, Munsell & Hall,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. D. F. Anderson; Mr. R. B. Newcomb; Mr.*
      *613
      *H. E.'Starkey; Messrs. Anderson, McNab'& Anders ons*and *Mr. Frank M. Cobb,*for defendant in error.

Judgment reversed on authority of *Klunk*v. *Hocking Valley Railway Co.,*74 Ohio St., 125.

" Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.