alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. (the Company) on FORM 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phillip
W. Ware, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |    |  |                                          
|------------------ |  | -- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: May 23, 2011 |  | By |  | /s/ Phillip W. Ware                      
|                   |  |    |  | Phillip W. Ware                          
|                   |  |    |  | Chief Executive Officer,                 
|                   |  |    |  | President and Principal Financial Officer

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and will be retained by Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



23
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Jonathan R. Burst, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International FuelTechnology, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructionscontained in SEC Release 33-8760; 34-54942];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: May 7, 2007         By:  */s/ Jonathan R. Burst*    Jonathan R. Burst    Chief Executive Officer
#### FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF MARTIN COUNTY, Petitioner, v. Dorothy E. OTT, formerly known as Dorothy E. King, Respondent.

No. 44782.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 21, 1974.

CARLTON, C. J., and- ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of FX Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Clay Newton, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

/s/ Clay Newton

Clay Newton

Principal Financial Officer

March 10, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COMPLETE STREETS 

A Complete Street is safe, and feels safe, for all users. 

FHWA supports the planning, implementation and evaluation of 

equitable streets and networks that prioritize safety, comfort, 

and connectivity for all people who use the street network.

See the next page for how Complete Streets can serve pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation 

users, children, older individuals, individuals with disabilities, motorists, and freight vehicles. 

A Complete Streets implementation strategy combines innovations from multiple disciplines to achieve the creation of safe, connected, and equitable street networks. 

Visit FHWA’s Complete Streets website for resources to support developing and implementing a Complete Streets strategy. Visit the sites below for frequent updates as 

new information and resources become available.

Source: FHWA

FHWA Complete 

Streets Overview

FHWA Complete 

Streets Funding

FHWA Complete 

Streets Planning

FHWA Complete 

Streets 

Implementation

Source: FHWA
Creating a safe, connected, 

and equitable Complete Streets Network 

can be an iterative strategy that involves implementing 

improvements over time.

Black, Indigenous, and people 

of color represent 38% of the total 

U.S. population but account for

48% 

of all 

pedestrian fatalities.1

32.5% 

of Americans live in a 

household with one car. 

8.5%

live in zero-car households.3

Of the top 30 pedestrian 

crash hotspot locations in 

the U.S.,

75%

 are bordered by 

low-income communities.2

Implementing Complete Streets equitably includes 

identifying underserved communities, recognizing 

their varying transportation needs, and prioritizing 

the creation of safe, connected networks.

NHTSA estimates that in 2021,

42,915 

people died in crashes, 

a 10.5% increase from 38,824 

fatalities in 2020.4

Complete Streets prioritize 

safety for all users at every 

part of the transportation 

process and address two of 

the Safe System elements 

(Safe Speeds and Roads).

Complete Streets 

increase transportation 

options for all 

roadway users.

FHWA-SA-23-003

Source: FHWA

1 https://www.ghsa.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/Ped%20Spotlight%202021%20FINAL%203.23.21.pdf

2 https://jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/1825

3 https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/vehicles/

4 https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/early-estimate-2021-traffic-fatalities
<Page>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.23.3


February 10, 2003


Robert E. Rubin
399 Park Avenue, 3rd Floor
New York, NY  10022

Dear Bob:

        I am writing on behalf of Citigroup Inc. to confirm certain changes to
your employment agreement dated October 26, 1999, as amended on February 6,
2002. The guaranty of a level of incentive compensation for 2002 is extended
through 2003, and all of the provisions of the employment agreement relating to
such incentive compensation (such as composition and manner of payment),
including those designed to avoid the loss of deduction under Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code, shall apply to such extended guaranty.

        If the foregoing is consistent with our discussions, please sign in the
space provided below.

                                        Very truly yours,


                                        Citigroup Inc.


                                        By:   /s/ Sanford I. Weill
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Sanford I. Weill,
                                           Chairman and Chief
                                           Executive Officer

Accepted and agreed:


/s/ Robert E. Rubin
--------------------------------
Robert E. Rubin
##### 



Exhibit 11 ESS Technology, Inc. Computation of Net Income Per Share (1)
(In thousands, except per share amounts) December 31,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Weighted average common shares
    
    
    39,476
    
    
    
    39,517
    
    
    
    44,044Weighted average incremental common equivalent shares:Common stock (2)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,721
    
    
    
    2,687Total weighted average common and common equivalent shares
    
    
    39,476
    
    
    
    41,238
    
    
    
    46,731Net income (loss)
    
    $
    (35,550
    )
    
    $
    25,291
    
    
    $
    37,277Net income (loss) per share
    
    $
    (0.90
    )
    
    $
    0.61
    
    
    $
    0.80
   (1)
    
    This Exhibit should be read in conjunction with Note 12, Shareholders
Equity, to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Report.(2)
    
    Earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common
shares and common equivalent shares (weighted average shares) outstanding
during the period. Common equivalent shares consist of the Companys common
stock issuable upon exercise of stock options (using the treasury stock
method), except when antidilutive.
# L_2005146EN.01001001.xml

| 10.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 146/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 146/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 876/2005

of 9 June 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 28th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 28th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 39,291 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

2

---
#### Emile C. GIBBONS and Mrs. Betty Asher v. W. F. HOLDER, d/b/a Commercial Finance Company.

No. 47249.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 15, 1973.

Donald O. Simmons, Gulfport, for appellants.

Floyd & Floyd, Gulfport, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Harrison County; Frank W. Alexander, Chancellor.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

Affirmed.
#### Calvin Lewis WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1770.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 6, 1978.

*553Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Seherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William M. Grodnick, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The single point urged on this appeal from the revocation of appellant’s probation is that the trial judge erred in denying the appellant’s motion for a continuance of the revocation hearing. The appellant pleaded guilty to three counts of breaking and entering and three counts of grand larceny. He was placed on probation for ten years.

A preliminary hearing was held on December 20, 1976, on two new charges against the defendant: (1) carrying a concealed firearm and (2) loitering where narcotics are sold.

An affidavit of violation of probation was filed on December 29, 1976. A hearing on the violations of probation by carrying a weapon was held on March 28, 1977. Defense counsel requested a continuance because he had not deposed all of the police officers prior to the hearing. The court granted a continuance of two days for the defense to present its case but permitted the State, whose witnesses were present, to go forward with the case. On March 30th, defense counsel, after concluding its defense, renewed the request for continuance. The second request was denied. It is this order upon which error is urged.

We hold that a denial of due process does not appear on this record. See *State v. Heath,*343 So.2d 13 (Fla.1977); *Bernhardt v. State,*288 So.2d 490 (Fla.1974).

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 4.10


[LOGO - PRUDENTIAL]              PRUDENTIAL CAPITAL GROUP
                                 Corporate Finance
                                 Two Prudential Plaza, Suite 5600,
                                 Chicago IL 60601-6716
                                 Tel 312 540-0931 Fax 312 540-4222

                                October 18, 2000


Corrpro Companies, Inc.
1090 Enterprise Drive
Medina, Ohio 44256

         Re:      Note Purchase Agreement dated as of January 21, 1998, as
                  amended (the "Note Agreement) by and among Corrpro Companies,
                  Inc. (the "Company") and The Prudential Insurance Company of
                  America ("Prudential")


Ladies and Gentlemen:

         The Company hereby covenants and agrees with Prudential that if the
Company does not incur additional Subordinated Indebtedness in an amount of not
less than $10,000,000 on or before February 28, 2001 on terms and conditions
which are satisfactory to the Required Holders in their reasonable discretion,
then the interest rate on the Notes shall be automatically and immediately
increased by one-half of one percent (0.50%) per annum; PROVIDED, however, the
Required Holders agree that this interest rate adjustment shall be eliminated or
modified, as the case may be, at the request of the Company, if the Banks agree
to eliminate or modify the similar interest rate adjustment under the Credit
Agreement and (i) no Default or Event of Default was continuing at such time
under the Credit Agreement, (ii) the Company paid no compensation to the Banks
in connection with the elimination or modification of such interest rate
adjustment unless comparable compensation is paid to Prudential and (iii) no
Default or Event of Default shall be continuing under the Note Agreement.

         The terms used but not defined herein shall have their respective
meaning ascribed thereto in the Note Agreement. Please indicate your acceptance
below.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

                                    By: /s/ WILLIAM ENGELKING
                                        ------------------------------------
                                             Vice President
                                        ------------------------------------


Accepted and Agreed to as
of October 18, 2000

CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.

By: /s/ NEAL R. RESTIVO
   ----------------------------------
Title: Executive VP and CFO
      ------------------------------
An equal opportunity employer

1220 L Street, Northwest Russell White

Washington, DC 20005-4070 Health Sciences Manager

Tel 202-682-8344

Fax 202-682-8270

whiter@api.org

September 2, 2011

Karl Simon

Division Director

Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. 

Mail Code: 6406J

Washington, DC 20460

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation: 

Final Submission for 211(b) (Docket No. A-90-07)

Final Report Gasoline TBA Vapor Condensate: A One-Generation Whole-Body 

Inhalation Reproductive Toxicity Study in Rats (HLS Study No. 00-4206)

Dear Mr. Karl Simon:

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), 

is submitting the following information to EPA as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) 

Alternative Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation:

• Final Report Gasoline TBA Vapor Condensate: A One-Generation Whole-Body 

Inhalation Reproductive Toxicity Study in Rats (HLS Study No. 00-4206)

This report has undergone review by two independent peer-reviewers, outside QA/QC, the 

211(b) Technical Workgroup, and EPA (Hauchman to Oge Memorandum, December 17, 2010). 

Therefore the final report is being submitted to you at the EPA Office of Transportation and Air 

Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs Division, as part of the requirements of Clean 

Air Act Section 211(b)(2) and 211(e) (Docket No. A-90-07). If you require further information or 

have any questions regarding this submission, please contact me.

Regards,

Russell D. White

Encl (1): Final Report Gasoline TBA Vapor Condensate: A One-Generation Whole Body 

Inhalation Reproductive Toxicity Study in Rats (HLS Study No. 00-4206)

Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended July 3, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 11, 2009 |  | /s/ GARY E. DICKERSON  
|                       |  | Gary E. Dickerson      
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.
                               One Beacon Street
                               Boston, MA 02108

                               March 3, 2009



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC  20549




RE:      DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund, DWS Global Bond Fund and DWS
         Global Opportunities Fund (each a "Fund", and together the "Funds"),
         each a series DWS Global/International Fund, Inc. (the "Corporation")
         (Reg. Nos. 33-05724, 811-04670)


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the
Corporation hereby certifies that the form of Prospectuses and Statements of
Additional Information that would have been filed on behalf of the Funds
pursuant to Rule 497(c) upon the effectiveness of Post-Effective Amendment No.
81 to the Corporation's Registration Statement on form N-1A (the "Amendment"),
do not differ from that contained in the Amendment, which is the most recent
Registration Statement and was filed electronically on February 27, 2009.


Any comments or questions on this filing should be directed to the undersigned
at (617) 295-3986.

                                Very truly yours,


                                /s/Scott D. Hogan

                                Scott D. Hogan
                                Vice President
                                Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.

cc:      Adam Schlichtmann, Esq., Ropes & Gray