alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3668 

To authorize certain States to erect temporary protective fencing within 

25 miles of the southwest border to deter illegal immigration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2024 

Mr. VANCE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize certain States to erect temporary protective 

fencing within 25 miles of the southwest border to deter 

illegal immigration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Border Security 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF PROTECTIVE FENCING. 

7 Section 2 of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (Public 

8 Law 109–367; 8 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (b)— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3668 IS

1 (A) by striking everything preceding ‘‘the 

2 term’’ and inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

4 ‘‘(1) the term’’; and 

5 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

6 inserting the following: ‘‘; and 

7 ‘‘(2) the term ‘protective fencing’ means fencing 

8 that is reasonably calculated to deter illegal border 

9 crossings by aliens outside a port of entry.’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(c) PROHIBITION AGAINST REMOVING PROTECTIVE

12 FENCING.— 

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2) 

14 and notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 

15 employee or agent of the Federal Government may 

16 execute or enforce any provision of the Immigration 

17 and Nationality Act by dismantling, removing, de18 stroying, or tampering with concertina wire, razor 

19 wire, barbed wire, or other protective fencing erected 

20 by a State government within 25 miles of the inter21 national border between the United States and Mex22 ico. 

23 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition described in 

24 paragraph (1) shall not apply in situations where the 

25 Federal Government demonstrates, by clear and conVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:54 Feb 06, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3668.IS S3668

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3668 IS

1 vincing evidence, that the fencing referred to in such 

2 paragraph was erected by a State government with 

3 the intention of facilitating illegal immigration rath4 er than deterring illegal immigration. 

5 ‘‘(3) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF.—The Attorney Gen6 eral may seek injunctive relief in an appropriate 

7 Federal district court to order any State that has 

8 erected protective fencing intended to facilitate ille9 gal immigration to remove such fencing by meeting 

10 the evidentiary standard described in paragraph 

11 (2).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of FX Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas B. Lovejoy,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas B. Lovejoy
-------------------------
Thomas B. Lovejoy
Chief Financial Officer
March 10, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                             RANGER INDUSTRIES, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ranger Industries, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Masters,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




/s/ Charles G. Masters
----------------------
Charles G. Masters
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
May 15, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1899

GAZENA ERCHAFO ERDILO, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A95-906-357) Submitted: April 19, 2006 Decided: May 11, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Hailu, LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS HAILU, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Larry D. Adams, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gazena Erchafo Erdilo, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. In his petition for review, Erdilo challenges the determination that he failed to establish his eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Erdilo fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that he seeks. Additionally, we uphold the denial of Erdilo’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Erdilo fails to show that* Erdilo’s brief merely asserts, without supporting argument, that he seeks review of the immigration judge’s denial of his request for protection under the Convention Against Torture. We therefore find that he has waived appellate review of this claim. SeeEdwards v. City of Goldsboro , 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999). - 3 - he is eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal. * Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Docket Number: FAA-2014-0927

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the following Registration Statements:

|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|(1) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-178069) pertaining to the registration of 2,000,000 shares of common stock to be offered in connection with the Colony Financial, Inc.
Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan,
|    | 
|(2) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-177829) pertaining to the Colony Financial, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan,                                                                                                                
|    | 
|(3) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-176481) of Colony Financial, Inc. and related Prospectus for the registration of $1,000,000,000 in common stock, preferred stock, depositary
shares, warrants and rights,                   
|    | 
|(4) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-176485) of Colony Financial, Inc. and related Prospectus for the registration of 2,175,000 shares of common stock, and                                                                      
|    | 
|(5) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-162188) pertaining to the Colony Financial, Inc. 2009 Non-Executive Director Stock Plan;                                                                                                    

of our reports dated March 11, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Colony Financial, Inc.
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Colony Financial, Inc., and our reports dated March 7, 2011 with respect to the 2010 financial statements of ColFin WLH Funding, LLC and ColFin NW Funding, LLC, included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2012.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California

March 11, 2013
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58955-58956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28841]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-42-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

October 27, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 21, 1997, Florida Gas Transmission 
Company (FGT), 1400 Smith Street, P.O. Box 1188, Houston, Texas 77251-
1188, filed in Docket No. CP98-42-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
157.205 and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) for authorization to construct and 
operate a new delivery point in Hillsborough County, Florida for TECO 
Peoples Gas (TECO), under FGT's blanket certificate issued in Docket 
No. CP82-553-000, pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as 
more fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission 
and open to public inspection.
    FGT proposed to construct, operate, and own an additional delivery 
point for TECO at or near mile post 17.7 on its existing St. 
Petersburg/Sarasota Connector in Hillsborough County, Florida. FGT 
states that the subject delivery point will include a tap, minor 
connecting pipe, electronic flow measurement equipment, and any other 
related appurtenant facilities necessary for FGT to transport for and 
deliver to TECO up to 24,000 MMBtu per day and 8,760,000 MMBtu per year 
of natural gas. FGT states that TECO will reimburse FGT for the $67,000 
estimated construction costs. FGT further states that TECO will 
construct, own, and operate the meter and regulation station.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for

[[Page 58956]]

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28841 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 4.49


Schwartz Levitsky Feldman
llp


CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS


LICENSED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


TORONTO
· MONTREAL


 





 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM


 


The undersigned, Schwartz Levitsky
Feldman llp, hereby consents to the use of our name and the use of our opinion dated March 13, 2017 on the consolidated financial
statements of Novicius Corp., (formerly: Intelligent Content Enterprises Inc.) (the “Company”) for the fiscal years
ended August 31, 2016 and 2015 included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F being filed by the Company.


 


	 	/S/SCHWARTZ LEVITSKY FELDMAN LLP
	 	 
	Toronto, Ontario, Canada	Chartered Accountants
	December 29, 2017	Licensed Public Accountants


 


	 	 	2300 Yonge Street, Suite 1500, Box 2434
	 	 	Toronto, Ontario M4P 1E4
	 	 	Tel:  416 785 5353
	 	 	Fax:  416 785 5663
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,655]


White Cap, Incorporated, Hayward, California; Notice of Negative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application of September 17, 1997, the Glass, Molders, Pottery, 
Plastics & Allied Workers International Union requested administrative 
reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding 
worker eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance, applicable 
to workers of the subject firm. The denial notice was signed on August 
25, 1997 and was published in the Federal Register on September 17, 
1997 (62 FR 48887).
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be grated under the 
following circumstances:
    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) if it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
    (3) if in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
the decision.
    The request for reconsideration claims that customers of the 
subject firm were being serviced by products made in Mexico.
    In order for the Department to issue a worker group certification, 
all of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Trade 
Act must be met. Review of the investigation findings show that 
criterion (3) was not met. Layoffs at the subject firm were the result 
of the consolidation of metal bottle and jar cap production from the 
subject firm into two other company-owned plants located domestically.

Conclusion

    After review of the application and investigative findings, I 
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law 
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department 
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 27th day of October 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-29213 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
No. 9491.

#### Osburg, an Infant, by etc., *v.*Anshutz.

(Decided November 13, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Clermont County..

*Mr. W. J. Davidson; Messrs. Nichols & Nichols*and *Mr. Prescott Smith,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs Burch & Johnson; Mr. Charles J. Inott*and *Mr. Eli H. Speidel,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-1223 

________________________________________________________________________ 

WEAPONS 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ROMANIA 

Signed at Washington September 13, 2011 

with 

Attachment 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ROMANIA 

Weapons 

 Agreement signed at Washington 

 September 13, 2011; 

 Entered into force December 23, 2011. 

 With attachment.
CPP Lending Report

NAME OF INSTITUTION

(Including Holding Company Where Applicable) Person to be contacted regarding this report:

The Harbor Bank of Maryland (Harbor 

Bankshares Corporation)

Joseph Haskins, Jr.

UST Sequence Number: 1273

City: Baltimore

State: Maryland

RSSD:

(for Bank Holding Companies)

2008130

Holding Company Docket Number:

(for Thrift Holding Companies)

n/a

FDIC Certificate Number:

(for Depository Institutions)

24015

Loan Activity For: Mar, 2018

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance (Thousands $) 66,772

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance Key

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance Comment

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance (Thousands$) 145,753

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance Key

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance Comment

Total Outstanding Balance (Thousands $) 212,525

Total Outstanding Balance Key

Total Outstanding Balance Comment

General Market Commentary
CPP Lending Report

NAME OF INSTITUTION

(Including Holding Company Where Applicable) Person to be contacted regarding this report:

OneUnited Bank Kenneth Tse

UST Sequence Number: 97

City: Boston

State: Massachusetts

RSSD:

(for Bank Holding Companies)

Holding Company Docket Number:

(for Thrift Holding Companies)

FDIC Certificate Number:

(for Depository Institutions)

23966

Loan Activity For: Mar, 2018

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance (Thousands $) 489,644

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance Key

ncludes month-end balances of 1-4 single-family and multi-family residential mortgages, cash reserve loans , 

credit cards and overdrafts.

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance Comment

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance (Thousands$) 8,807

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance Key

Includes month-end balances of co

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance Comment

Total Outstanding Balance (Thousands $) 498,451

Total Outstanding Balance Key

Total Outstanding Balance Comment

General Market Commentary
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3604 

To amend title 1, United States Code, to clarify that certain tax exemptions 

are not treated as Federal financial assistance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2024 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. VANCE, Mr. BRAUN, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. 

HAWLEY, Mr. SCHMITT, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. LANKFORD, and Mr. LEE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title 1, United States Code, to clarify that certain 

tax exemptions are not treated as Federal financial assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safeguarding Charity 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3604 IS

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE NOT TO INCLUDE 

2 CERTAIN TAX BENEFITS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 1, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 9. FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE. 

7 ‘‘In the case of any organization described in sub8 section (c) or (d) of section 501 of the Internal Revenue 

9 Code of 1986 or any organization described in section 

10 401(a) of such Code, for purposes of any Federal law, 

11 rule, or regulation, unless explicitly provided otherwise, 

12 the term ‘Federal financial assistance,’ or any other term 

13 referring to assistance provided by the Federal govern14 ment, shall not include any exemption from Federal in15 come tax.’’. 

16 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

17 for chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended 

18 by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘9. Federal financial assistance.’’. 

19 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec20 tion or the amendments made by this section shall be con21 strued to imply that an exemption from Federal income 

22 taxes under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code 

23 of 1986 constituted assistance from the Federal governVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:05 Jan 20, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3604.IS S3604

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3604 IS

1 ment for periods before the date of the enactment of this 

2 Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB