alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3706 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3706

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend section 3663A of title 18, United States Code, to clarify that 
 restitution includes necessary and reasonable expenses incurred by a 
              person who has assumed the victim's rights.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Victims' Voices Outside and Inside 
the Courtroom Effectiveness Act'' or the ``Victims' VOICES Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTITUTION FOR EXPENSES OF PERSONS WHO HAVE ASSUMED THE 
              VICTIM'S RIGHTS.

    Section 3663A(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(4) Clarification.--In ordering restitution under this section, a 
court shall order the defendant to make restitution to a person who has 
assumed the victim's rights under paragraph (2) to reimburse that 
person's necessary and reasonable--
            ``(A) lost income, child care, transportation, and other 
        expenses incurred during and directly related to participation 
        in the investigation or prosecution of the offense or 
        attendance at proceedings related to the offense;
            ``(B) lost income, transportation, and other expenses 
        incurred that are directly related to transporting the victim 
        for necessary medical and related professional services and 
        devices relating to physical, psychiatric, and psychological 
        care, including nonmedical care and treatment rendered in 
        accordance with a method of healing recognized by the law of 
        the place of treatment; and
            ``(C) lost income, transportation, and other expenses 
        incurred that are directly related to transporting the victim 
        to receive necessary physical and occupational therapy and 
        rehabilitation.''.

            Passed the Senate February 29, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3706

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend section 3663A of title 18, United States Code, to clarify that 
 restitution includes necessary and reasonable expenses incurred by a 
              person who has assumed the victim's rights.
```
Exhibit
23.1


CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-162223 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan of CreXus
Investment Corp. of our report dated February 25, 2010, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of CreXus Investment Corporation, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CreXus Investment Corporation for the period
from September 22, 20009 (date operations commenced) to December 31,
2009.
  /s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
  New York,
New York
 February
25, 2010
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of FX Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David N. Pierce, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ David N. Pierce

David N. Pierce

Chief Executive Officer

March 10, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6211

TITO F. HARRIS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 4:20

- cv - 00 9 06

- TMC )

Submitted : Ju ly 2 0 , 2021 Decided: July 23, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE , and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tito F. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tito F. Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendati on of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Harris’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will n ot issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the distr ict court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruli ng is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. Limiting our review to the issues raised in the informal brief, we conclude that Harris has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-22046 |
|------------------------------------|-----------|

 

DWS RREEF World Real Estate & Tactical Strategies Fund, Inc.

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 12/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 12/31/07 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

| **ITEM 1.** | **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS** |
|-------------|----------------------------|

 

 

 

DECEMBER 31, 2007

Annual Report
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-1214 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CULTURAL PROPERTY 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and KOSOVO 

Signed at Washington December 14, 2011 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
KOSOVO 

Cultural Property 

 Agreement signed at Washington 

 December 14, 2011; 

 Entered into force December 14, 2011.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 21, 2021

p0414 

# Order

Clerk April 21, 2021

162063

FARM BUREAU GENERAL INS URANCE

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 162063

COA: 347918

Wayne CC: 17

- 015647

- CK

OMAR HYDER KHAN, MINARA BEGUM

CHOWDHURY, RAFNA BEGUM

CHOWDHURY, MOHAMMED SALEH AHMED,

RED AHMED, TAZIN ULLAH, and DAVID

EDWARD MOLITOR,

Defendants,

and

LOVELY HORE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 20, 2020

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Flight Batteries Log

Date Time Location PIC VO Flight Duration Weather
Takoff/Landing Incident Observations Cur Cycle Life Cycle
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 56155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28582]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-174-005]


Gulf States Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

October 23, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 20, 1997, Gulf States Transmission 
Corporation (GSTC), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, certain tariff sheets to be effective November 
1, 1997.
    GSTC states that the purpose of the filing is to comply with the 
Commission Staff's letter order dated October 14, 1997 in Docket No. 
RP97-174-004, which involves compliance with the Commission's Order No. 
587-C, issued March 4, 1997 in Docket No. RM96-1-004.
    GSTC states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its 
jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make Protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28582 Filed 10-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
International Fuel 10-Q




EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In conjunction with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Fuel Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
 
 I, Jonathan R. Burst, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 August 16, 2010

By:
/s/ Jonathan R. BurstJonathan R. BurstChief Executive Officer
**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of                section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                Registrant. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                              |                                   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                   | /s/              STEPHEN CROSSON  |
|   | Stephen                CrossonChief                Financial Officer & Chief Operating                Officer |

----

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of                section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                Registrant. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                 |                             |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|   |                                                                      | /s/              MICHAEL SKELTON |
|   | Michael                SkeltonChief                Executive Officer |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 5, 2007 |  | /S/ GARY E. DICKERSON  
|                        |  | Gary E. Dickerson      
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### Charles PATTERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. K-512.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

July 17, 1969.

Charles Patterson, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*726PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order appealed is hereby affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-14-00354-CR

____________________

JASON BLACKWELDER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 410th District Court 

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-09-10342 CR 

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Jason Blackwelder filed a notice of appeal but he did not make payment 

arrangements for the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). The appellant 

has been represented by retained counsel and he did not file an affidavit of 

indigence. The appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. On October 13, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal 

would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No 

response has been filed. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to 
2

file the clerk’s record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 43.2(f). 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON

 Justice

Submitted on December 9, 2014

Opinion Delivered December 10, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Exhibit 10.37

AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO OEM AGREEMENT

This
Amendment Number 1 to OEM Agreement (the "Amendment") is made and entered into on this 18th day of April 2002 by and among Control Break International Corp., a Florida
corporation having offices at 201 8th Street South, Suite 107, Naples, Florida 34102 ("CBI") and SSP Solution Inc ("SSP"), a Delaware Corporation having its offices at17061 Cartwright
Road, Irving, California 92614.

WHEREAS,
CBI and SSP entered into an OEM/Value Added Reseller Agreement dated November 21, 2001, pursuant to which, among other things, CBI granted SSP certain limited rights and a license to
market and distribute certain CBI products (the OEM Agreement); and

WHEREAS,
CBI and SSP desire to amend the OEM Agreement as set forth below,a.

NOW
THEREFORE,

The
parties hereby agree as follows:



SSP Solutions, Inc.

Control Break International CorporationBy:


By:Name:


Name:Title:


Title:


---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59724-59725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-360-1220-00]


Interlakes Special Recreation Management Area Plan and Final 
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Redding Resource Area, NORCAL 
District, California.

ACTION: Notice of availability of a plan and FEIS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: BLM has released a plan and FEIS covering land management 
options and anticipated consequences regarding the Interlakes Special 
Recreation Management Area. Preparation of this plan and FEIS is a 
joint effort between the BLM, U.S. Forest Service, National Park 
Service, and Bureau of Reclamation. BLM was directed to lead this 
planning effort under BLM's Record of Decision for the Redding Resource 
Management Plan and EIS which was

[[Page 59725]]

prepared under the authority of the Federal Land Policy and Management 
Act of 1976 (section 202). This plan and FEIS is prepared under the 
authority of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Interlakes Special Recreation Management 
Area is a 74,850 acre region which encompasses lands administered 
through the United States Department of the Interior's BLM, National 
Park Service, Bureau of Reclamation, and the Department of 
Agriculture's Forest Service. Once approved, this plan will guide 
management activities for the BLM for the next 10 to 15 years. The 
National Park Service, Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Forest Service 
may approve this plan by continuing with this joint planning effort and 
approving a Record of Decision, or may implement portions of this plan 
by tiering to this document within their own planning documents.

DATES: Comments on this plan and FEIS should be submitted in writing by 
December 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles M. Schultz, Area Manager, 
Bureau of Land Management, 355 Hemsted Drive, Redding, CA 96002.

    Dated: October 27, 1997.
Francis Berg,
Acting Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-29111 Filed 11-03-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
(@@ Proposed Trail
= Proposed Median Barrier

[| “=== Proposed Retaining Wall

Proposed Relocated
Boundary Wall

Arlington\Cemetery
Metro|Station

:d|Retaining)Wall]
'

Reta
G

Proposed,
Boundary ca
Sift
No. 00-839.

#### Rivet et al. *v.*Regions Bank of Louisiana et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Herman Lee CARROLL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-968.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 16, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, Edwin T. Mulock, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See*Leone v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 404; Daniels v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 405.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.