### 0 | P a g e 

# Amendment No. 1

a nd Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program 

# ADOPTED JUNE 2013

### 1 | P a g e 

# Table of Contents

Introduction

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 2 Project Modifications

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 3 Modifications to FTIP Projects

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 4 Modifications to RTP Projects

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 30 Fiscal Impact

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 36 Fiscal Impact Summary

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 36
Senate Bill 375 and the Sustainable Communities Strategy

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 37 Transportation Conformity

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 38 Regional Emissions Analysis

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 39
South Central Coast Air Basin

– Ventura County Portion

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 40
South Coast Air Basin

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 40 Western Mojave Desert Air Basin

– Los Angeles County (Antelope Valley Portion) and San Bernardino County (Western Portion of MDAB)

.... 44 Mojave Desert Air Basin

– San Bernardino County Portion Excluding Searles Valley

................................ ................................ ............................. 44 Mojave Desert Air Basin

– Searles Valley portion of San Bernardino County

................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 44
Salton Sea Air Basin

– Imperial County Portion

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 45
Public Review and Comment

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 46 Comments and Responses

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 47
Conclusion

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 48
Attachments: Public Comments

### 2 | P a g e



## Introduction On April 4, 2013, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) adopted the 2012

- 2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) for the six

- c ounty region including Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties. The 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS represents the region’s commitment to reduce emissions from transportation sources to comply with Senate Bill (SB) 375 , improve pu blic health, and meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards set forth by the federal Clean Air Act.
A major component of the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS is a Project List containing thousands of individual transportation projects that aim to improve the region’ s mobility and air quality, and revitalize our economy . Since its adoption , some of these project s have experienced technical changes that are time

- sensitive and require amendment s to the RTP/SCS and the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) in order to allow these projects to move forward in a timely manner

. The purpose of this document is to identify the project changes being made via Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and the associated Amendment No. 1 3

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP, and provide documentation demonstrating that the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS as amended will continue to comply with federal and state requirements, including the recently

- enacted Moving Ahead for Progress for the 21 st 

### Century Act (MAP

- 21) metropolitan planning require ments , the Transportation Conformity Rule , and SB 375

. An Addendum to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) has also been prepared to assess proposed changes to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS Project List as detailed herein.

### 3 | P a g e



## Project Modifications The project changes identified in Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP can be broadly categorized as follows:

 Project is new and is not currently included in the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS Project List

 Project currently exists in the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS Project List, but:

o has a revised description,

o has a revised schedule,

o has a change in total cost, or

o includes a combination of the above chan ges

 Dup licate project removed or project combined with another project in the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS Project List The t able s on the following pages provide details of the project changes from the current Plan and are intended to illustrate a before

- and

- after scenario for each of the projects. For modeled projects, the “Project Completion By” year represents the Plan network year for which the project was analyzed for modeling and regional emissions analysis purposes

. F or more specific individual project inform ation as part of the RTP /SCS modeling and regional emissions analysis, please refer to the modeled projects list updated through Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP (Model List) available at http://scag.ca.gov

.

### 4 | P a g e



## Modifications to FTIP Projects

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

IMPERIAL 6OM0701 IMP091001 LOCAL HIGHWAY 0 EXISTING:

WIDEN AND IMPROVE CESAR CHAVEZ BLVD. T O 4 LANES (2+2) FROM 2ND STREET TO SR 98. OTHER IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE: SURFACE REHAB, TURN LANES, TRAFFIC SIGNAL, LIGHTING, AND SIDEWALKS. EXISTING: 2014 EXISTING:

$ 2,850 RTP

PROJECT COST INCREASE. REVISED

DESCRIPTION , SCHEDULE, AND COST

REVISED: WIDEN AND IMPROVE CESAR CHAVEZ BLVD. T O 5 LANES (3+2) FROM 2ND STREET TO SR 98. OTHER IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE: SURFACE REHAB, TURN LANES, TRAFFIC SIGNAL, LIGHTING, AND SIDEWALKS REVISED: 2015 REVISED:

$8,930

LOS ANGELES LA990359 LA990359 LOCAL HIGHWAY 0 EXISTING:

GRADE SEP XINGS SAFETY IMPR; 35

- MI FREIGHT RAIL CORR. THRGH SAN.GAB. VALLEY

- EAST. L.A. TO POMONA ALONG UPRR ALHAMBRA &L.A. SUBDIV

- ITS 2318 SAFETEA #2178; 1436 #1934 PPNO 2318 2018 EXISTING: $1,347,101 RTP

PROJECT COST DECREASE. REVISED

DESCRIPTION AND COST

### 5 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED: GRADE SEP XINGS SAFETY IMPR; 35

- MI FREIGHT RAIL CORR. THRGH SAN.GAB. VALLEY

- EAST. L.A. TO POMONA ALONG UPRR ALHAMBRA & L.A. SUBDIV

- ITS 2318 SAFETEA #2178; 1436 #1934 PPNO 2318. NOGALES (LA) PROJECT INCLUDES WIDENING FROM 2 TRAVEL LANES TO 4 TRAVEL LANES OF E.WALNUT DRIVE NO. EAST OF NOGALES FOR 2600 LINEAR FEET AND WIDENING FROM 2 TRAVEL LANES TO 4 TRAVEL LANES OF GALE AVE. WEST OF NOGALES FOR 1900 LINEAR FEET. REVISED: $1,286,500

### 6 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

LOS ANGELES LAE0465 LA0G440 STATE HIGHWAY 5 EXISTING:

ROUTE 005: PHASE 2 AND 3 OF 3

-- IN LA/SANTA CLARITA: PHASE 2 (N/B FR RTE 14 TO WELDON CNYN ROAD; CONSTRUCT HOV LANE )& PHASE 3 (FR SR14 TO PARKER RD OC ; CONSTRUCT HOV, TRUCK & AUX LANES (E A 2332C, PPNO 3189A & EA 2332E PPNO 3189B)
, SAFTETEA

- LU#465. PE & RW $ ARE PROGRAMMED FOR EA 2332E ONLY. EXISTING: 2017 $410,000 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION AND SCHEDULE

REVISED: ROUTE 005: PHASE 2,FROM SR

- 14 TO PARKER ROAD, CONSTRUCT HOV/HOT, TRUCK & AUX LANES (E A 2332C, PPNO 3189A & EA 2332E PPNO 3189B)
, SAFTETEA

- LU#465. PE & RW $ ARE PROGRAMMED FOR EA 2332E ONLY. REVISED: 2018

### 7 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

LOS ANGELES REG0703 LA0G872 STATE HIGHWAY 110 EXISTING:

ROUTE 110: NORTHBOUND 405/SOUTHBOUND 110 CONNECTOR WIDENING OR REPLACEMENT WITH A FLYOVER AND CONSTRUCT A NEW AUXILIARY LANE ON SOUTHBOUND 110 FROM I

- 405/I

- 110 INTERCHANGE TO DEL AMO BLVD. (EA 29370 PPNO 4552)

- STUDY ONLY. 2014 $1,150 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION

REVISED: ROUTE 110: NORTHBOUND 405/SOUTHBOUND 110 CONNECTOR WIDENING OR REPLACEMENT WITH A FLYOVER AND CONSTRUCT A NEW AUXILIARY LANE ON SOUTHBOUND 110 FROM I

- 91/I

- 110 INTERCHANGE TO TORRANCE BLVD. (EA 29370 PPNO 4552)

### 8 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

LOS ANGELES 7120010 LA000789 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING: BURBANK

- GLENDALE

PASADENA AIRPORT INTERMODAL GROUND ACCESS LINK FEASIBIL ITY STUDY AND CONDUCT PE, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A LINK BETWEEN THE AIRPORT AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES. EXISTING: 2015 EXISTING:

$ 5,484 REVISED

FTIP PROJECT COST FALLS WITHIN PARENT RTP 7120010 PROJECT COST. NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION, SCHEDULE, AND FTIP PROJECT COST

REVISED: BURBANK

- GLENDALE

PASADENA AIRPORT INTERMODAL GROUND ACCESS LINK FEASIBIL ITY STUDY: CONDUCT PE, DESIGN OF A LINK BETWEEN THE AIRPORT AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES. (CONSTRUCTION IN LA000789A) REVISED: 2017 REVISED:

$3,696

### 9 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

LOS ANGELES 7120010 LA000789A TRANSIT BURBANK

- GLENDALE

PASADENA AIRPORT INTERMODAL GROUND ACCESS LINK: CONSTRUCTION OF A LINK BETWEEN THE AIRPORT AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW METROLINK STATION AT HOLLYWOOD WAY/SAN FERNANDO ROAD ON THE AN TELOPE VALLEY LINE AND A LINK BETWEEN THE AIRPORT AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES. (CONSTRUCTION OF LA000789) 2018 $1,788 NEW FTIP PROJECT COST FALLS WITHIN PARENT RTP 7120010 PROJECT COST. NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. NEW FTIP

PROJEC T

LOS ANGELES 1TL0703 LA0D376 TRANSIT 0 CONSTRUCTION OF GRADE SEPARATIONS ON 35 MILE FREIGHT RAIL CORRIDOR FROM LOS ANGELES TO POMONA. 2015 $959 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. FTIP PROJECT

DELETION, PROJECT COMBINED WITH LA990359

### 10 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

LOS ANGELES LA0D29 LA0D29 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING: HEART OF THE CITY BU S TRANSFER STATION AMENITIES. 2014 EXISTING: $9,378 RTP

PROJECT COST INCREASE. REVISED

DESCRIPTION AND COST

REVISED: HEART OF THE CITY BU S TRANSFER STATION AMENITIES. RELOCATE THE EXISTING INTERMODAL TRANSIT TERMINAL AND CONSTRUCT A NEW TRANSIT CENTER WITH 12 BUS BAYS, PASSENGER WAITING AREA AND INFORMATION CENTER, AND A DRIVER OPERATOR LOUNGE. THE PROPERTY WILL ALSO PROVIDE 339 PUBLIC PARKING SPACE S (PLUS 2 FOR STAFF: MAINTENANCE & SECURITY) AND BICYCL E FACILITIES. LOCATION

- 1521 KINGSDALE AVENUE, REDONDO BEACH, CA 90278 REVISED: $10,045

LOS ANGELES LA0G901 LA0G901 TRANSIT HISTORIC LOS ANGELE S STREETCAR 2018 $125,000 NEW RTP PROJECT COST. NEW PROJECT

### 11 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

ORANGE 2A0704 ORA130401 LOCAL HIGHWAY WIDEN CERRITOS

AVENUE EASTBOUND 4 TO 5 LANES, FROM WALKER STREET TO ANGELA AVENUE. 2014 $378 NEW FTIP PROJECT COST FALLS WITHIN PARENT RTP 2A0704 PROJECT COST. NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. NEW FTIP

PROJECT

ORANGE 2H0703 ORA111210 STATE HIGHWAY 5 EXISTING:

I

- 5 FROM SR 55 TO SR 5 7

- ADD 1 HOV LANE EACH DIRECTION; RECONSTRUCT THE FIRST ST/FOURTH ST I C ON SB I

- 5 TO INCREASE WEAVING LENGTH TO STANDARD (EXTEND MERGE LANES BY 100 FEET) 2018 EXISTING: $45,669 REVISED

FTIP PROJECT COST FALLS WITHIN PARENT RTP 2H0703 PROJECT COST. NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION AND FTIP PROJECT COST

REVISED: I

- 5 FROM SR 55 TO SR 5 7

- ADD 1 HOV LANE EACH DIRECTION; RECONSTRUCT THE FIRST ST/FOURTH ST IC ON SB I

- 5 TO INCREASE WEAVING LENGTH TO STANDARD REVISED: $46,356

### 12 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

ORANGE 2M0730 ORA111801 STATE HIGHWAY 5 EXISTING:

I

- 5 WIDENING (EL TORO TO SR

- 73)

- ADD 2 GP LANES FROM AVERY TO ALICIA IN BOTH DIRECTIONS; EXTEND 2ND HOV FROM EL TORO TO ALICIA IN BOTH DIRECTIONS; PROVIDE OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS; AND RECONFIGURE INTERCHANGES AT AVERY PKWY & LA PAZ. CONSISTENT WITH THE 2012 RTP 2023 $6,000 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION

REVISED: I

- 5 WIDENING (EL TORO TO SR

- 73)

- ADD 1 GP LANES FROM AVERY TO ALICIA IN EACH DIRECTIONS; EXTEND 2ND HOV FROM EL TORO TO ALICIA IN EA CH DIRECTIONS; PROVIDE OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS; AND RECONSTRUCT INTERCHANGES AT AVERY PKWY & LA PAZ RD. CONSISTENT WITH THE 2012 RTP

### 13 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

ORANGE 2M0733 ORA100511 STATE HIGHWAY 55 EXISTING:

SR

- 55 WIDENING BETWEEN I

- 405 AND I

- 5

- ADD 1 MF LANE EACH DIRECTION AND FIX CHOKEPOINTS FROM I

405 TO I

- 5; ADD 1 AUX LANE EA DIR BTWN SELECT ON/OFF RAMP THROUGH PROJECT LIMITS (PS&E AND PAED). CONSISTENT WITH THE 2012 RTP EXISTING: 2021 EXISTING:

$297,000 REVISED

FTIP PROJECT COST FALLS WITHIN PARENT RTP 2M0733 PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION, SCHEDULE, AND FTIP PROJECT COST

REVISED: SR

- 55 WIDENING BETWEEN I

- 405 AND I

- 5

- ADD 1 MF LANE EACH DIRECTION AND FIX CHOKEPOINTS FROM I

405 TO I

- 5; ADD 1 AUX LANE EA DIR BTWN SELECT ON/OFF RAMP AND NON

- CAPACITY OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS THROUGH PROJECT LIMITS (PS&E AND PAED). CONSISTENT WITH THE 2012 RTP REVISED: 2020 REVISED:

$274 ,900

### 14 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

ORANGE ORA030605 ORA030605 STATE HIGHWAY 405 EXISTING:

I

- 405 FROM SR

- 73 TO I

605. IN EACH DIRECTI ON ADD 1 MF LAND, CONVERT EXISTING HOV TO HOT, ADD 1 ADDITIONAL HOT LANE, AND ADDITIONAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. COMBINED WITH ORA045, ORA151 AND ORA120310. CONSISTENT WITH THE 2012 RTP 2023 $1,694,000 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION

REVISED: I

- 405 FROM SR

- 73 TO I

605 ADD 1 MF LANE EACH DIR AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. #317. COMBINED WITH ORA045, ORA151 AND ORA120310 ORA120310.

### 15 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

ORANGE 2TR0701 ORA080908 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING: A TRANSIT CORRIDOR FOR THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

- ANAHEIM RAPID CONNECTION (ARC) FIXED GUIDEWAY SYSTEM LINKING THE ANAHEIM REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION INTERMODAL CENTER (ARTIC) TO THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS, EIR/EIS, L PA AND CONCEPTUAL AND ADVANCED ENGINEERING, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES AND PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING. EXISTING: 2015 EXISTING:

$18,536 REVISED

FTIP PROJECT COST FAL LS WITHIN PARENT RTP 2TR0701 PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION, SCHEDULE, AND FTIP PROJECT COST

### 16 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED: A TRANSIT CORRIDOR FOR THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

- ANAHEIM RAPID CONNECTION (ARC) FIXED GUIDEWAY SYSTEM CONNECTING THE ANAHEIM REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION INTERMODAL CENTER (ARTIC) THE PLATINU M TRIANGLE, AND THE ANAHEIM RESORT. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS, EIR/EIS, L PA AND CONCEPTUAL AND ADVANCED ENGINEERING, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES AND PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING. REVISED: 2020 REVISE D:

$319,000

RIVERSIDE 30M0701

-

RIV110302 RIV110302 STATE HIGHWAY 10 EXISTING:

ON I

- 10 IN THE CITY OF BLYTHE

- PROVIDE NEW W/B ON AND W/B OFF RAMPS TO HOBSON WAY APPROX 1,800' W/O EXISTING RAMPS TO RIVIERA DR/INSPECTION STATION. THE NEW RAMPS WILL REPLACE EXISTING CONNECTION TO RIVIERA DR. 2015 EXISTING: $3,635 RTP

PROJECT COST INCREASE. REVISED

DESCRIPTION AND COST

### 17 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED: ON I

- 10 IN THE CITY OF BLYTHE

- PROVIDE NEW W/B ON AND W/B OFF RAMPS TO HOBSON WAY APPROX 3,500'' W/O EXISTING RAMPS TO RIVIERA DR/INSPECTION STATION. THE NEW RAMPS WILL REPLACE EXISTING CONNECTION TO RIVIERA DR. REVISED: $3,998

SAN BERNARDINO 200018 200018 LOCAL HIGHWAY 0 EXISTING:

BOULDER AV ACROSS CITY CREEK S/O BASELINE

- RECONSTRUCT EXISTING BRIDGE FROM 2 TO 4 LANES; ALSO WIDEN BOULDER AVE FROM 190 FT NORTH TO 1,43 0 FT SOUTH OF BRIDGE FROM 2

- 4 LANES (54C0648)(TOLL CREDI TS $600 FOR FY12/13 CON ) EXISTING: 2012 EXISTING:

$21,898 RTP

PROJECT COST DECREASE. REVISED

DESCRIPTION, SCHEDULE, AND COST

### 18 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED: BOULDER AV ACROSS CITY CREEK S/O BASELINE

- RECONSTRUCT EXISTING BRIDGE FROM 2 TO 4 LANES; ALSO WIDEN BOULDER AVE FROM 190' NORTH TO 1,430' SOUTH OF BRIDGE FROM 2

- 4 LANES (54C0648) REVISED: 2014 REVISED:

$16,765

SAN BERNARDINO 20130403 20130403 LOCAL HIGHWAY 0 IN RIALTO, CONSTRUCT

PEPPER AVE

- 4 LANES FROM NORTHERN TERMINUS TO APPROX 1,300 FT S/O HIGHLAN D AVE AND 2 LANES FROM APPROX 1,300 FT S/O HIGHLAND AVE TO HIGHLAND AVE 2014 $15,000 NEW RTP PROJECT COST. NEW PROJECT

### 19 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

SAN BERNARDINO 20084104 20084104 LOCAL HIGHWAY 0 EXISTING:

JOSHUA STREET PARK & RIDE EXPANSION

- ON JOSHUA STREET WEST OF US 395,C ITY OF HESPERIA, EXISTING P NR HAS 188 SPACES AND NEEDS TO ADD 150 SPACES, TO INCLUDE LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND VARIOUS NON

- CAPACITY STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITATE ADDITIONA L SPACES (TOLL CREDITS TO BE USED IN ENG & CON PHASES.CMAQ ADDED $5 IN 10/11 AN D $67 2011/12 ) EXISTING: 2012 EXISTING:

$638 RTP

PROJECT COST INCREASE. REVISED

DESCRIPTION, SCHEDULE, AND COST

REVISED: JOSHUA STREET PARK & RIDE EXPANSION

- ON JOSHUA STREET WEST OF US 395,C ITY OF HESPERIA, EXISTING P NR HAS 188 SPACES AND NEEDS TO ADD 200 SPACES, TO INCLUDE LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND VARIOUS NON

- CAPACITY STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITATE ADDITIONA L SPACES REVISED: 201 4 REVISED:

$743

### 20 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

SAN BERNARDIN O 200622 200622 LOCAL HIGHWAY 0 LENWOOD GRADE

SEPARATION

- NORTH OF WEST MAIN ST; APPROX.400 FT. N/O T O 600 FT. S/O BNSF AND SANTA FE RR RIGHT

- OF

WAY

- 4 TRAVEL LANE GRADE SEPARATION (CA627) EXISTING: 2014 $31,732 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

SCHEDULE

REVISED: 2015

SAN BERNARDINO 20130401 20130401 LOCAL HIGHWAY 0 ON ORANGE ST. FROM

2,000 FT. S/O GREENSPOT RD. TO 7,800 FT. N/O PIONEE R AVE

- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 2 LANE TO 4 LANE BRIDGE 2018 $4,630 NEW RTP PROJECT COST. NEW PROJECT

SAN BERNARDINO 20130402 20130402 LOCAL HIGHWAY 0 RESTRIPE EXISTING

STRUCTURAL SECTION OF BAKER BLVD BETWEEN I

- 15 RAMPS AND SH 127 FROM 2

- 4 LANE CONFIGURATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH PROJECT TO REPLACE EXISTING 2 LANE BRID GE 54CO127 WITH 4 LANE BRIDGE 2015 $25 NEW RTP PROJECT COST. NEW PROJECT

### 21 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

SAN BERNARDINO 200064 200064 LOCAL HIGHWAY 0 EXISTING:

WASHINGTON ST FROM RECHE CANYON TO HUNTS LN

- ELIMINATE BOTTLENECK ADD NB TURN POCKET; WIDEN 2

- 4 LNS ON WASHINGTON FROM RECHE CYN. TO HUNTS LN. USING EXISTING WIDTH; MODIFY SIGNALS EXISTING: 2012 $570 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION

REVISED: WASHINGTON ST FROM RECHE CANYON TO HUNTS LN

- ELIMINATE BOTTLENECK BY ADDING NB TURN POCKET AT RECHE CANYON RD. (EXCLUSIV E LEFT AND RIGHT) THROUGH RESTRIPING AND WIDENING WITHIN R/W; MODIFY TRAFFIC SIGNALS REVISED: 2014

SAN BERNARDINO 44810

-

44812 44812 STATE HIGHWAY 10 EXISTING:

I

- 10 TIPPECANOE RECONFIGURE INTERCHANGE & LOCAL RD IMP/MOD (HP 1366)(FORMERLY PART OF RTP ID 44810)(WESTBOUND)(N ON

- CAPACITY LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS

- NO THRU LANES) EXISTING: 2014 EXISTING:

$57,070 RTP

PROJECT COST INCREASE. REVISED

DESCRIPTION, SCHEDULE, AND COST

### 22 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED: I

- 10 TIPPECANOE RECONFIGURE INTERCHANGE & LOCAL RD IMP/MOD (HP 1366)(WESTBOUND

- PHASE II)(FORMERLY PART OF RTP ID 44810 ) REVISED: 2015 REVISED:

$61,863

SAN BERNARDINO 200048 200048 STATE HIGHWAY 15 EXISTING:

I

- 15 AT BASELINE INTERCHANGE

- FROM 1,800 N/O BASELINE T O 2,400' S/O; 1800' W /O TO EAST AVE. TO 1500 ' E/O EAST AVE

- WIDEN RAMPS (INCLUDING BRIDGES), WIDEN BASELINE RD. FROM 4

- 6 LANES, WIDEN EAST AVE. FROM 2

- 4 LANES, REALIGN AND WIDEN S/B AND N/B DIAMOND RAMPS FROM 1

- 2 LNS (INCLUDG BRIDGES, AD S.B LOOP ON

- RAMP (IN CL BRIDGES) ADD I

- 15 ACCEL/DECEL LANES, AND OPERATIONAL IMPROVEME EXISTING: 2014 EXISTING:

$43,100 RTP

PROJECT COST INCREASE. REVISED

DESCRIPTION, SCHEDULE, AND COST

### 23 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED: I

- 15 AT BASELINE INTERCHANGE

- FROM 1,800 N/O BASELINE T O 2,400FT S/O; 1800FT W/O TO EAST AVE. TO 1500FT E/O EAST AVE

WIDEN RAMPS (INCLUDING BRIDGES), WIDEN BASELINE RD. FROM 4

- 6 LNS, WIDEN EAST AVE. FROM 2

- 4 LNS, REALIGN AND WIDEN S/B AND N/B DIAMOND RAMPS FROM 1

- 2 LNS (INCLUDG BRIDGES, AD S.B LOOP ON

- RAMP (INCL BRIDGES) ADD I

- 15 ACCEL/DECEL LNS, AND OPERATIONAL IMPRVMNTS (EA497100)(CA435) REVISED: 2015 REVISED:

$53,378

### 24 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

SAN BERNARDINO 20061201 20061201 STATE HIGHWAY 15 EXISTING:

I

- 15/I

- 215 I/C IMPRVMTS

- DEVORE I/C S/O GLEN HELEN PKWY TO N/O KENWOOD & ON I

- 215 FROM S/O DEVORE RD. I/C TO I

- 15 (16.0

- 17.8) ADD 1 M/F LN IN EA DIR TO EXIS TG 3 M/F LNS FROM 3800 FT S/O GLEN HELEN PKWY TO 3100 FT N/O I

215 I/C, CONSTRUCT TRUCK BYPASS LNS S/O I

- 15/215 I/C TO N/O KENWOOD I/C RECONFIG OF I

- 15/215 I/C DEVORE RD. I/C & KENWOOD I/C RE CONNECT OF CAJON BTWN DEVORE RD & KENWOOD(TLL CRDTS) 2018 EXISTING: $324,246 RTP

PROJECT COST DECREASE. REVISED

DESCRIPTION AND COST

### 25 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED: I

- 15/I

- 215 I/C IMPROVMTS

- DEVORE I/C S/O GLEN HELEN PARKWY TO N/O KENWOOD & I

- 215 FROM S/O DEVORE RD. I/C TO I

- 15 (16.0

- 17.8) ADD 1 M/F LN IN EA D IR TO EXISTG 3 M/F LNS FROM 380 0 FT S/O GLEN HELEN PARKWY TO 3100 FT N/O I

- 215 I/C ADD 1 DECEL LN FROM 3200 F T S/O I

- 15 /215 I/C OFFRMP TO S/B DEVORE ON I

- 215, CONSTRUCT TRUCK BYPASS LNS. REVISED: $323,865

SAN BERNARDINO 4M1007 20110110 STATE HIGHWAY 210 EXISTING:

CONSTRUCT NEW FULL

SERVICE INTERCHANGE WITH DIAMOND CONFIGURATION AT SR

210 AND PEPPER AVENUE IN THE CITY O F RIALTO. ADD WB AND EB ACCEL AND DECEL LANES AND LOCAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS (CONSTRUCT 4 LANES ON PEPPER AVE FROM HIGHLAND AVE TO 160 FT SOUTH OF SR

- 210). 2015 $18,965 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION

### 26 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED: CONSTRUCT NEW FULL

SERVICE INTERCHANGE WITH DIAMOND CONFIGURATION AT SR

210 AND PEPPER AVENUE IN THE CITY OF RIALTO. ADD WB AND EB ACCEL AND DECEL LANES AND WIDEN PEPPER FROM 2

- 4 LANES FROM HIGHLAND AVE. TO EXISTING 4 LAN E SECTION S/O INTERCHANGE SAN BERNARDINO 4M01005 20111625 STATE HIGHWAY 210 EXISTING:

SR210 LANE ADDITION

- ADD 1 MIXED FLOW LANE IN EACH DIRECTION FROM HIGHLAND AVE(S/B). T O I

- 10 (REDLANDS) INCLUDES AUX. LANES BETWEEN HIGHLAND AND 5TH STS AND AN ACCE LERATION LANE AT 5TH ST. S/B ON RAMP 2020 $143,939 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION

### 27 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED: SR210 LANE ADDITION

- ADD 1 MIXED FLOW LANE IN EACH DIRECTION FROM HIGHLAND AVE(S/B). TO LUGONIA (REDLANDS) INCLUDES AUX. LANES BETWEEN BASE LINE AND 5TH STS AND AN ACC ELERATION LANE AT 5TH ST. S/B ON RAMP SAN BERNARDINO 4M01043 OM630 STATE HIGHWAY 215 EXISTING:

I

- 215 MT. VERNON/WASHINGTON ST. INTERCHANGE

RECONSTRUCT I/C

- (PROJECT IS IN REPLA CE O/C STRUCTURE; RECONFIGURE ON/OFF RAMPS; ADD SB ACCEL AND NB DECEL LANE

I MPROVEMENTS TO LOCAL STREETS (PA & ED ONLY) EXISTING: 2018 EXISTING:

$85,000 REVISED

FTIP PROJECT COST FALLS WITHIN PARENT RTP 4M01043 PROJECT COST. NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT REVISED

DESCRIPTION, SCHEDULE, AND FTIP COST

### 28 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED: I

- 215 MT. VERNON/WASHINGTON ST. INTERCHANGE

RECONSTRUCT I/C

REPLACE O/C STRUCTURE; RECONFIGURE ON/OFF RAMPS; ADD SB ACCEL AND NB DECEL LANE

IMPROVEMENTS TO LOCAL STREETS REVISED: 2020 REVISED:

$71,500 COST. NO

FISCAL IMPACT.

SAN BERNARDINO 4TR0101 20061012 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING: DOWNTOWN S.B. PASSENGER RAIL

– FROM SAN BERNARDINO METROLINK STATION TO APPROX. 1 MILE EAST TO A NEW METROLINK STATION AT RIALTO AVE AND E ST. IN DOWNTOWN SAN BERNARDINO EXISTING: 2014 EXISTING:

$66,021 REVISED

FTIP PROJECT COST FALLS WITHIN PARENT RTP 4T R0101 PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION, SCHEDULE, AND FTIP COST

REVISED: DOWNTOWN S.B. PASSENGER RAIL

– FROM SAN BERNARDINO METROLINK STATION TO APPROX. 1 MILE EAST TO A NEW TRANSIT STATION AT RIALTO AVE AND E ST. IN DOWNTOWN SAN BERNARDINO REVISED: 2015 REVISED:

$83,713

### 29 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLE

TION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

VENTURA 5AL07 VEN121201 LOCAL HIGHWAY MADERA RD IN SIMI

VALLEY. WIDEN EASTSIDE FROM SIMI VILLAGE DR TO LOS ANGELES AVE TO ADD THIRD LANE AND RIGHT

TURN LANE. 2014 $600 NEW FTIP PROJECT COST FALLS WITHIN PARENT RTP 5AL07 PROJECT COST. NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. NEW FTIP

PROJECT

* For modeled projects, represents the Plan network year for which the project was analyzed for modeling and regional emissions analysis

### 30 | P a g e



## Modifications to RTP Projects

COUNTY RTP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLETION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

IMPERIAL 6120011 LOCAL HIGHWAY 0 CESAR CHAVEZ FROM 2 ND STREET TO SR

- 98: WIDEN AND IMPROVE 2018 $13,196 DUPLICATE RTP PROJECT COST REMOVED. REMOVED

DUPLICATE PROJECT

IMPERIAL 6120002 STATE HIGHWAY I

- 8 RECONSTRUCT I

- 8 INTERCHANGE AT IMPER IAL AVE.: FROM A TWO

- LANE TO A FOUR

- LANE DIAMOND TYPE OVERCROSSING, REALIG N AND RECONSTRUCT ON AND OFF

RAMPS, AND PROVIDE A CCESS TO IMPERIAL AVE. SOU TH OF I

8. 2020 $39,635 DUPLICATE RTP PROJECT COST REMOVED. REMOVED

DUPLICATE PROJECT

ORANGE 2121001 LOCAL HIGHWAY 0 NEW RAIL GRADE SEPAR ATION ON LOSSAN CORRIDOR AT STATE COLLEGE BLVD (ANAHEIM) 201 5 $ 92,000 NEW RTP PROJECT COST

. NEW PROJECT

(PREVIOUSLY IN 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS STRATEGIC PLAN)

### 31 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLETION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

ORANGE 2A0704 LOCAL HIGHWAY REGIONAL

CAPACITY PROGRAM COMPLETE MPAH, IMPRO VE

ARTERIAL CAPACITY. 2035 $1,984,650 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

MODELING DETAILS INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF THE 19 TH STREET ADDITION FROM BALBOA TO BANNING; AND A COMPLETION DATE OF 2016 FOR THE BROOKHURST STREET SEGMENT 600’NORTH OF THE I

- 5 TO SR

91 ORANGE 2H0703 STATE HIGHWAY I

- 5 EXISTING: ADD 1 HOV LANE EACH DIRECTION; RECONSTRU CT THE FIRST ST/FOURTH ST I C ON SB I

- 5 TO INCREASE WEAVIN G LENGTH TO STANDARD; EXTEND MERGE LANES B Y 100 FEET 2018 $46,400 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION

REVISED: ADD 1 HOV LANE EACH DIRECTION; RECONSTRUCT THE FIRST ST/FOURTH ST I C ON SB I

- 5 TO INCREASE WEAVIN G LENGTH TO STANDARD

### 32 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLETION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

ORANGE 2M0730 STATE HIGHWAY I

- 5 EXISTING: ADD 2 GP LANES FROM AVERY TO ALICIA IN BOTH DIRECTIONS; EXTEND 2 ND HOV FROM EL TORO TO ALIC IA IN BOTH DIRECTIONS; PRO VIDE OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS; AND RECONFIGURE INTERCHA NGES AT AVERY PKWY & LA P AZ 2023 $558,700 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION

REVISED: ADD 1 GP LANE FROM A VERY TO ALICIA IN EACH DIRECTION; EXTEND 2ND HOV FROM EL TORO TO ALICIA IN EACH DIRECTION; PROV IDE OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS; AND RECONSTRUCT INTERCHA NGES AT AVERY PKWY & LA P AZ RD. ORANGE ORA030605 STATE HIGHWAY I

- 405 EXISTING: I

- 405 FROM SR

- 73 TO I

- 605. IN EACH DIRECTION, ADD 1 MF LANE, CONVERT EXISTI NG HOV TO HOT, ADD 1 ADDITI ONAL HOT LANE, AND ADDITI ONAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING: 2023 EXISTING:

$1,694 NO

CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST (COST REVISION REVISED

DESCRIPTION, SCHEDULE, AND COST (COST REVISION CORRECTS TYPOGRA

-

### 33 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLETION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED: ADD 1 MF LANE IN EAC H DIRECTION, AND ADDIT IONAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS (BY 2022); CONVERT EXIST ING HOV TO HOT, ADD 1 ADDITI ONAL HOT LANE EACH DIRECTION (BY 2035) REVISED: 2035 REVISED:

$1,694,000 CORRECTS

TYPOGRA

PHICAL ERROR; ORIGINAL RTP/SCS FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS BASED ON CORRECT COST). NO FISCAL IMPACT. PHICAL ERROR)

ORANGE EXISTING:

2M0733 STATE

HIGHWAY SR

- 55 EXISTING: ADD 1 MF LANE EACH DIRECTION AND FIX CHOKEPOINTS FROM I

- 405 TO SR

- 22; ADD 1 AUX LANE E A DIR BTWN SELECT ON/OFF R AMP AND OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS THROUGH PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING: 2023 EXISTING:

$343,055 RTP

PROJECT COST INCREASE

. PROJECT SPLIT,

REVISED SCHEDULE AND COST

REVISED (1 OF 2): 2M0733 REVISED (1 OF 2) : ADD 1 MF LANE EACH DIRECTION AND FIX CHOKEPOINTS FROM I

- 405 TO I

- 5; ADD 1 AUX LANE EA DIR BTWN SELECT ON/OFF R AMPS AND OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS THROUGH PROJECT LIMITS REVISED (1 OF 2) : 2020 REVISED

(1 OF 2) : $274,900

### 34 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLETION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED ( 2 OF 2): 2121002 REVISED (2 OF 2): I

- 5 TO SR

- 91: ADD CAPACITY AND FIX CHOKEPOINTS FROM I

- 5 TO SR

- 22; AND OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS THROUGHOUT PROJECT LIMITS REVISED (2 OF 2): 2023 REVISED

(2 OF 2): $148,490

ORANGE 2TR0701 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING: ANAHEIM RAPID CONNEC TION: ELEVATED FIXED

- GUIDEWAY SYSTEM CONNECTING TH E ANAHEIM REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION INTERMODAL CENTER, T HE PLATINUM TRIANGLE, A ND THE ANAHEIM RESORT 2020 EXISTING: $676,000 RTP

PROJECT COST DECREASE. REVISED

DESCRIPTION AND COST

REVISED: ANAHEIM RAPID CONNEC TION: FIXED

- GUIDEWAY SYSTEM CONNECTING THE ANAHE IM REGIONAL TRANSPORTAT ION INTERMODAL CENTER, T HE PLATINUM TRIANGLE, A ND THE ANAHEIM RESORT REVISED: $ 319,000

ORANGE 2TR1001 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING: SANTA ANA AND GARDEN GROVE FIXED GUIDEWAY BETWEEN SARTC AND A NEW TRANSIT CENTER IN GA RDEN GROVE, NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF HARB OR BOULEVARD AND WESTMINSTER AVENUE. 2018 EXISTING: $252,000 RTP

PROJECT COST DECREASE. REVISED

DESCRIPTION AND COST

### 35 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT COMPLETION BY* PROJECT

COST ($1,000’S) FISCAL

IMPACT REASON FOR

AMENDMENT

REVISED: SANTA ANA AND GARDEN GROVE FIXED GUIDEWAY BETWEEN SARTC AND A NEW TRANSIT CENTER IN GA RDEN GROVE, NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF HARBOR BOULEVARD AND WESTMINSTER AVENUE. SEGMENT 1: SARTC TO BRISTOL SEGMENT 2: BRISTOL T O HARBOR REVISED: $ 225,000

SAN BERNARDINO 4120194 TRANSIT 0 ADD A SECOND TRACK/ADDITIONAL PAS SING TRACK THROUGHOUT THE CORRIDOR OF PHASE 1 PROJECT EXISTING: 2020 $183,490 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

SCHEDULE REVISED: 2023

SAN BERNARDINO 4TR0101 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING: EXTEND RAIL SERVICE TO REDLANDS (9 MILES); COMMUTER RAIL TECHNOLOGY EXISTING: 2015 $148,879 NO CHANGE TO RTP PROJECT COST. NO FISCAL IMPACT. REVISED

DESCRIPTION AND SCHEDULE

REVISED: EXTEND METROLINK RAI L SERVICE FROM RIALTO/ E ST IN SAN BERNARDINO TO REDLANDS (9 MILES) REVISED: 2018

* For modeled projects, represents the Plan network year for which the project was analyzed for modeling and regional emissions analysis

### 36 | P a g e



## Fiscal Impact This A mendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS includes changes to existing projects, addition of new projects , and removal of duplicate projects . Individual project changes are addressed in the Modifications to Projects section s of this document (pp. 4

- 3 5 )

. In terms of overall impact on the RTP/SCS Financial Plan, there was a net cost decrease of $ 137 million to the 2012‒2035 RTP/SCS Financial Pla n from the Modifications to Projects . A summary of these changes are broken down by county in the below table (see first three rows in table below). Any net cost increases to the RTP/SCS Financial Plan are being funded by the identified sources broken down by county (see table below) which are in addition to 2012‒2035 RTP/SCS forecasted

revenues. Based on review of the funding considerations for each project documented herein, SCAG finds that this A mendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS does not adversely impact the financial constraint of the 2012‒2035 RTP/SCS. The RTP/SCS remains financially constrained.



## Fiscal Impact Summary

(Amounts in $1,000’s ) IMPERIAL COUNTY LOS ANGELES

COUNTY ORANGE

COUNTY RIVERSIDE

COUNTY SAN

BERNARDIN O COUNTY VENTURA

COUNTY SCAG

REGION

C ost increases: changes to existing and new projects $6,080 $126,817 $ 240,490 $ 363 $ 21,099 $0 $ 394,849 Cost decreases: changes to existing projects and deleted projects ($13,196) ($ 60,601 ) ($ 452,155 ) $0 ($ 5,541 ) $0 ($ 531,493 ) Net cost increase (decrease) ($7,116) $ 66,216 ($ 211,665 ) $ 363 $ 15,558 $0 ($ 136,644 )

Additional funding sources:
County sales tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $ 4,630 $0 $ 4,630

Other local funds $0 $ 65 ,257 $0 $ 363 $ 10,928 $0 $ 76,548
Total sources $0 $ 65,257 $0 $ 363 $ 15,558 $0 $ 81,178

### 37 | P a g e



## Senate Bill 375 and the Sustainable Communities Strategy Upon the adoption of the RTP/SCS in April 2012, SCAG determined that the plan met and exceeded all of the requirements for a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) as set forth in SB 375. A description of the SCS and how the requirements are addressed is included in the adopted Plan as Chapter 4. At the time of adoption, SCAG concluded that State

- established greenhouse gas emission reduction targets had been met and exceeded, and the California Air Resources Board reviewed and approved this conclusion in July 2012. This Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS makes certain changes to transportatio n projects. Staff has reviewed such changes relative to the adopted plan and the requirements of SB 375, and has determined that the RTP/SCS , as amended by Amendment No. 1 remains compliant with SB 375 and continues to meet and exceed the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets established for the SCAG region

.

### 38 | P a g e



## Transportation Conformity
T ransportation conformity is required under the Federal Clean Air Act to ensure that federally supported highway and transit project activities conform to the purpose of the State Implementation Plan (SIP). Conformity to the purpose of the SIP means that transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the relevant National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Conformity applies to non

- attainment and maintenance areas for the following transportation

- related criteria pollutants: ozone, particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), carbon monoxide ( CO), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2).

Under the U.S. DOT m etropolitan p lanning r egulations and EPA’s t ransportation c onformity r egulations, Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and Amendment No

. 13

- 04 to the 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) need to pass five tests: consistency with the adopted 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS, regional emissions analysis, timely implementation of transportation control measures (TCMs), financial constrai nt, and interagency consultation and public involvement.
The findings of the conformity determination for Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP are presented below. Details of the regional emissio ns analysis follow the finding s.



## Conformity Findings
SCAG’s findings for the approval of Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP are as follows:

 Consistency with 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS Test Inclusion of the amended projects in the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and 2013 FTIP would not change any other policies, programs or projects in the federally approved 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS.

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP are consistent with the federally approved 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and meet all federal and state requirements and regulations.

 Regional Emissions Tests

o Finding: The regional emiss ions analyses for Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP update the regional emissions analyses for the federally approved 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and 2013 FTIP

. o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions analysis for PM2.5 and its precursors meet all applicable emission budget tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years in the South Coast Air Basin (S CAB). o Finding: For the 1997 ozone national ambient air quality standards, Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions for ozone precursors meet all applicable emission budget tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years for the SCAB, South Central Coast Air Basin ([SCCAB], Ventura County portion), Western Mojave Desert Air Basin ([MDAB], Los Angeles County Antelope Valley portion and San Bernardino County western portion of MDAB), a nd the Salton Sea Air Basin ([SSAB], Riverside County Coachella Valley and Imperial County portions).

o Finding: For the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standards, Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP regi onal emissions for ozone precursors meet all applicable emission budget tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years for the Morongo Band of Mission Indians (Morongo), Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga Reservation (Pechanga), SCAB excluding Morongo and

### 39 | P a g e Pechanga, South Central Coast Air Basin ([SCCAB], Ventura County portion), Western Mojave Desert Air Basin ([MDAB], Los Angeles County Antelope Valley portion and San Bernardino County western portion of MDAB), and th e Salton Sea Air Basin ([SSAB], Riverside County Coachella Valley and Imperial County portions).

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions for NO2 meet all applicable emission budget tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years in the SCAB.

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions for CO meet all applicable emission budget tests for all milestone, attain ment, and planning horizon years in SCAB.

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions for PM10 and its precursors meet all applicable emission budget tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years in SCAB and the SSAB (Riverside County Coachella Valley portion).

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions for PM10 meet the interim emission test (build/no

- build test) for all milestone, attainment and planning horizon years for the MDAB (San Bernardino County portion excluding Searles Valley portion) and Searles Valley portion of San Bernardino County) and for the SSAB (Imperial County portion). o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions analysis for PM2.5 and its precursors me et the interim emission test (build/no

- build test) for all milestone, attainment and planning horizon years for the SSAB (urbanized area of Imperial County portion).

 Timely Implementation of TCMs Test

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and A mendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP does not revise or otherwise alter the scope, schedule, funding priority, or implementation of any TCM.

 Financial Constraint Test

o Finding: All projects listed in Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP are financially constrained for all fiscal years. Fiscal constraint is analyzed in the Fiscal Impact chapter of this report.

 Interagency Consultation and Public Involvement Test

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13

- 04 to the 2013 FTIP compl y with all federal requirements for interagency consultation and public involvement. The a mendment s were discussed at the Transportation Conformity Working Group (TCWG), which includes representatives from the fede ral, state, and local air quality and transportation agencies, on six occasions (September 25, October 23, November 27, 2012; January 22, February 26, and March 26, 2013). The draft conformity analysis was released for a 30

- day public review concluding May 9 , 2013 , and a public hearing was held on April 17, 2013. No conformity

- specific comment was received. 

## Regional Emissions Analysis
The following tables summarize the required regional emission ana lyses for each of the non

- attainment and maintenance areas within SCAG’s jurisdiction. For those areas which require budget tests, the emissions values in the tables below utilize the rounding convention used by California Air Resources Board to set the b udgets (i.e., any fraction rounded up to the nearest ton), and are the basis of the conformity findings for these areas. For paved road dust (PM2.5 and PM10) , SCAG uses the approved South Coast AQMD methodology, which uses EPA’s AP

- 42 for the updated Base Year and a combination of additional growth in center

- line miles and VMT for future years.

### 40 | P a g e



## South Central Coast Air Basin

– Ventura County Portion
Table 1. 1997 And 2008 8

- Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2021 2030 2035

ROG Budget 13 13 13 13

Plan 9 7 5 5 Budget

– Plan 4 6 8 8

NO x Budget 19 19 19 19

Plan 14 9 6 6 Budget

– Plan 5 10 13 13



## South Coast Air Basin
Table 2. 1997 8

- Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2017 2020 2023 2030 2035

ROG Budget 136 119 108 99 99 99

Plan 128 112 a 100 91 76 68 Budget

– Plan 8 7 8 8 23 31

NO x Budget 277 224 185 140 140 140

Plan 26 2 210 a 164 126 109 103 Budget

– Plan 15 14 21 14 31 37

a 2017 interpolated between 2014 and 2018

### 41 | P a g e

Table 3. 2008 8

- Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant Nonattainment Area 2014 2017 2018 2020 2021 2023 2032 2035

ROG Budget SCAB 136 119 119 108 108 99 99 99

Plan Morongo 0.4 0.4 a 0.4 0. 3 0.3 0.3 0. 3 0.3 Pechanga 0.0 0.0 a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SCAB excluding Morongo and Pechanga 141. 5 123. 8 a 117.9 108.4 104. 8 97.6 78. 4 73.5 Adjustments provided by

ARB - 14.8

- 12.4

- 11.3

- 9.6

- 8.7

- 7.7

- 5.9

- 5. 7

Sum 127. 1 111. 8 107.0 99.1 96.4 90. 2 72.7 68.0 SCAB 128 112 107 100 97 91 73 68 Budget

– Plan 8 7 12 8 11 8 26 31

NO x Budget SCAB 277 224 224 185 185 140 140 140

Plan Morongo 1.8 1.5 a 1.4 1. 0 1.1 1.0 0. 9 0.8 Pechanga 0.0 0.0 a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SCAB excluding Morongo and Pechanga 283.2 228. 1 209.7 177. 8 168. 4 156.7 122. 3 116.8 Adjustments provided by

ARB - 23.7

- 19.8

- 16.7

- 15.7

- 20.0

- 32.0

- 16.8

- 15.0

Sum 261.4 209.8 194.4 163. 1 149.5 125.7 106.4 102. 6 SCAB 262 210 195 164 150 126 107 103 Budget

– Plan 15 14 29 21 35 14 33 37

a 2017 interpolated between 2014 and 2018



### Table 4. PM2.5 (24

- Hour Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

ROG Budget 132 132 132 132

Plan 124 105 73 66 B udget

– Plan 8 27 59 66

NO x Budget 290 290 290 290

Plan 275 183 114 108 B udget

– Plan 15 107 176 182

PM2.5 Budget 35 35 35 35

Plan 21 12 5 5 B udget

– Plan 14 23 30 30

### 42 | P a g e

Table 5. PM10 (24

- Hour Emissions [ T ons/ D ay])
Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

ROG Budget 251 251 251 251

Plan a 124 9 6 73 66 B udget

– Plan 127 15 5 178 185

NO x Budget 549 549 549 549

Plan a 27 5 167 114 108 B udget

– Plan 27 4 382 435 441

PM10 Budget 166 166 166 166

Plan b 79 79 85 87 B udget

– Plan 87 87 81 79 

### a Including baseline adjustments provided by ARB. b E xcluding AQMD Backstop Measure.

On March 22, 2013, EPA Regional Administrator, Jared Blumenfeld , signed a proposed rule approv ing the South Coast PM10 maintenance plan and the associated motor vehicle emissions budgets. Table 6 below is for information purposes only since the proposed new budgets have not been finalized by EPA. If the new PM10 budgets are approved by EPA as propos ed , Table 6 will super s ed e Table 5 above

.

Table 6. PM10 (24

- Hour Emissions [Tons/Day]) with New PM10 Budgets Proposed by EPA in April 2013 (pending EPA approval)
Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

ROG Budget 182 110 81 81

Plan a 124 9 6 73 66 B udget

– Plan 58 14 8 15

NO x Budget 372 180 116 116

Plan a 2 75 167 114 108 B udget

– Plan 97 13 2 8

PM10 Budget 159 164 175 175

Plan b 79 79 85 87 B udget

– Plan 80 85 90 88 

### a Including baseline adjustments provided by ARB. b E xcluding AQMD Backstop Measure.

### 43 | P a g e

Table 7. CO (Winter Emissions [tons/day])

Pollutant 2015 2020 2030 2035

CO Budget 2,137 2,137 2,137 2,137

Plan 1,208 871 593 522 Budget

– Plan 929 1,266 1,544 1,615



### Table 8. NO2 (Winter Emissions [ T ons/ D ay])
Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

NO2 Budget 680 680 680 680

Plan 311 194 136 125 Budget

– Plan 369 486 544 555

### 44 | P a g e



## Western Mojave Desert Air Basin

– Los Angeles County (Antelope Valley Portion) and San Bernardino County (Western Portion of MDAB)
Table 9. 1997 and 2008 8

- Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [ T ons/ D ay])
Pollutant 2014 2020 20 27 2035

ROG Budget 22 22 22 22

Plan 13 10 9 8 Budget

– Plan 9 12 13 14

NO 

### x Budget 77 77 77 77

Plan 34 24 21 22 Budget

– Plan 43 53 56 55 

## Mojave Desert Air Basin

– San Bernardino County Portion Excluding Searles Valley
Table 10. PM10 (24

- Hour Emissions [ T ons/ D ay])
Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

PM10 No Build 9.8 10.1 11.8 12.8

Build 9.1 9.6 11.3 12.1 No Build

– Build 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.7 

## Mojave Desert Air Basin

– Searles Valley portion of San Bernardino County
Table 11. PM10 (24

- Hour Emissions [ T ons/ D ay])
Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

PM10 No Build 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Build 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 No Build

– Build 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


## Salton Sea Air Basin

– Riverside County Coachella Valley Portion

Table 12. 1997 and 2008 8

- Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [ T ons/ D ay])
Pollutant 2014 2020 20 27 2035

ROG Budget 7 7 7 7

Plan 6 6 4 4 Budget

– Plan 1 1 3 3

N Ox Budget 26 26 26 26

Plan 19 12 11 11 Budget

– Plan 7 14 15 15

### 45 | P a g e

Table 13. PM10 (24

- Hour Emissions [ T ons/ D ay])
Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

PM10 Budget a 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9

Plan 8.0 7.6 7.8 8.0 Budget

– Plan 2.9 3.3 3.1 2.9

a Budget set to one decimal place by 2003 Coachella SIP.



## Salton Sea Air Basin

– Imperial County Portion

Table 14. 1997 and 2008 Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [ T ons/ D ay])
Pollutant 201 5 2020 20 30 2035

ROG Budget 7 7 7 7

Plan 5 4 4 4 Budget

– Plan 2 3 3 3

N Ox Budget 17 17 17 17

Plan 12 9 9 10 Budget

– Plan 5 8 8 7



### Table 15. PM2.5 (24

- Hour Emissions [ T ons/ D ay])
Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

PM 2.5 No Build 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8

Build 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 No Build

– Build 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0



### Table 16. PM10 (24

- HOUR Emissions [ T ons/ D ay])
Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

PM 2.5 No Build 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.8

Build 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.4 No Build

– Build 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4

### 46 | P a g e



## Public Review and Comment SCAG is required to provide a 30

- day public review and comment period for the d raft Amendment. A Notice of Availability and Public Hearing , and the d raft Amendment was posted on SCAG ’s website at http://scag.ca.gov . Written comments were accepted until 5: 00 PM on Thursday, May 9 , 2013 , via US mail or email to:

Southern California Association of Governments A ttention: Margaret Lin 818 West Seventh Street, 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 or to lin @scag.ca.gov A public hearing was also held at SCAG’s Main Office in Los Angeles

on Wednesday , April 17 , 2013 , at 10: 00 AM and was accessible via videoconference at SCAG’s regional offices throughout the region.
One public comment was received. The comment, along with SCAG’s response, can be found on the table on the following page.
SCAG has also fully coordinated this Amendment with the region al stakeholders through SCAG’s committee structure . Specifically, staff provided periodic reports regardi ng this Amendment to the Transportation Committee (TC) , the Energy and Environment Committee (EEC)
, and Transportation Conformity Working Gr oup (TCWG).

### 47 | P a g e



## Comments and Responses

DATE NAME AFFILIATION FORMAT COMMENT SUMMARY RESPONSE TO COMMENT 4/15/13 JAMES MEJIA SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS E

- MAIL 

### SANBAG comment to 2013 FTIP Consistency Amendment #13

- 04:

1. SANBAG requests to change the lead agency of project 200048 from Rancho Cucamonga to SANBAG in our Amendment 4 submittal. Due to the anticipated approval of Amendment 4, SANBAG would like to submit as the project Lead Agency as we will being taking that ro le for the project’s construction phase. 2. We also would like to

cor rect the description on project 20061201. There is a typo near the end of the description that states I

- 12/I

- 215 IC instead of the I

- 15. Thank you for your comment. The requested changes ha ve been made, and appear in this final Amendment document.

### 48 | P a g e



## Conclusion This Amendment maintains the integrity of the transportation conformity findings of the adopted 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS. This Amendment also remains compliant under SB 375 and continues to meet and exceed the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. Furthermore, the PEIR Addendum associated with this Amendment concludes that the proposed project changes would not result in either new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effect s. Appropriate and adequate procedures have been followed in ensuring coordination of this Amendment , allowing all concerned parties, stakeholders, and the public ample opportunities to voice concern and provide input. In conclusion, this Amendment No. 1 t o the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS complies with all applicable federal and state requirements, including the Transportation Conformity Rule.

## Attachments: Public Comment s