alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Erickson, Assistant Vice President, Controller and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 6, 2007



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|/s/    ROBERT M.
ERICKSON                                                              
|Robert M. Erickson Assistant Vice President, Controller and Principal Financial Officer
November 7, 2002 

HSA10/B109 

Daniel J. Mushett 

Interstate Timber Products Co. 

111 Garnet Lane 

Oak Ridge, TN 37830 

Dear Mr. Mushett: 

In your September 6 letter to Mr. Richard Powers of my staff you requested 

acceptance of a recycled plastic offset block for use with strong post, metal beam 

guardrail on the National Highway System (NHS). You stated that your block is 

comprised of a 50/48 blend of High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) and Low Density 

Polyethylene (LDPE) with 2 per cent blowing agent. Subsequent to discussions with 

Mr. Powers, you modified the shape of your block and sent him a revised drawing 

on October 22. This final design is shown in the Enclosure to this letter. 

Based on staff recommendations and your product’s similarity to several previously 

accepted designs, I agree that your block may be considered equivalent to a routed 

timber offset block and may be used with strong post w-beam guardrail installations 

on the NHS. As with all recycled material offset blocks, this acceptance is based on 

the anticipated crash performance of the w-beam barrier when your block is used 

and is not intended to address its durability. It is also based on the assumption that 

all production blocks will be of the same materials and dimensions as noted herein. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 (original signed by Harry W. Taylor) 

 for: 

 Carol H. Jacoby, P.E. 

 Director, Office of Safety Design 

Enclosure
No. 9912.

#### Mack *v.*Eckerlin.

(Decided January 15, 1907.)

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Messrs. Closs & Luebbert,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Norwood*/. *Utter,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
#### ALOE CREME LABORATORIES, INC., Appellant, v. Alexander FARKAS, Appellee.

No. 69-686.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 26, 1970.

Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, Fort Lauder-dale, and James R. McKnight, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Cabot, Scott, Wenkstern & Casteel, Fort Lauderdale, and Carl G. Swanson, Merritt Island, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff below appeals from an adverse judgment entered on a jury verdict. On the pivotal issue at trial, relating to plaintiff’s claim of ownership of a patent applied for and acquired by the defendant after he left the employ of the plaintiff, as to whether the process patented was developed by defendant during and in the course of the employment, or prior thereto as contended by the defendant, the evidence was in some conflict. An examination of the record discloses there was competent substantial evidence to support the verdict and judgment for the defendant. We have considered the contentions of the appellant, in the light of the record and briefs, and conclude that no reversible error has been shown.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT NUMBER 13(2)**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**WITH RESPECT TO THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F**

**FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011**

**OF CHINA ENTERPRISES LIMITED**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,United States Code), the undersigned officer of China Enterprises Limited, a Bermuda company (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

Date: October 29, 2014 

 

The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officer.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28446]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ES-960-1910-12] ES-48891, Group 29, Illinois


Notice of Cancellation of Plat of Survey

    The plat accepted July 11, 1997 published in the Federal Register 
on July 22, 1997 (62 FR 39249) and stayed August 28, 1997 published 
August 28, 1997 (62 FR 45680) has been cancelled effective October 17, 
1997.

    Dated: October 20, 1997.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 97-28446 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Product
Inspections, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John Van Zyll, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated:   May 11, 2006                  By:  /s/ John Van Zyll
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John Van Zyll
                                            Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of
                                            the Board
                                            and Chief Financial Officer
June 6, 2013



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LOUIS DOUGLAS ROGERS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00182

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

___________ _____________________ This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which i s capable of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is modified to delete the listing of a specific amount of court costs.
The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as MODIFI ED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3533 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3533

  To appropriate, with an offset, $36,000,000 for the Seafood Import 
      Monitoring Program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
 Administration to increase audits of imported shrimp and red snapper.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2023

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To appropriate, with an offset, $36,000,000 for the Seafood Import 
      Monitoring Program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
 Administration to increase audits of imported shrimp and red snapper.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED AUDITS OF IMPORTED SHRIMP AND RED SNAPPER BY 
              SEAFOOD IMPORT MONITORING PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--There are appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $36,000,000 to the Administrator 
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for fiscal year 
2024 for the Seafood Import Monitoring Program to increase audits of 
imported shrimp and red snapper.
    (b) Offset.--Of the balances of amounts appropriated or otherwise 
made available for activities of the Internal Revenue Service by 
paragraphs (1)(A)(ii), (1)(A)(iii), (1)(B), (2), (3), (4), and (5) of 
section 10301 of Public Law 117-169 (commonly known as the ``Inflation 
Reduction Act of 2022'') that are available for obligation as of the 
date of the enactment of this Act, $36,000,000 are hereby rescinded.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55777-55778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Utah Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Utah Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 6:00 p.m. 
and adjourn at 8:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 6, 1997, at the Hilton 
Hotel, 150 West 500 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101. The purpose of 
the meeting is to discuss the status of the employment discrimination 
project, and plan future program activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Michael N. 
Martinez, 801-261-8169, or John Dulles, Director of the Rocky Mountain 
Regional Office, 303-866-1400 (TDD 303-866-1049). Hearing-impaired

[[Page 55778]]

persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten 
(10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, October 14, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-28449 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
No. 9939.

#### Richards, Receiver, *v.*Burson.

(Decided October 16, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Plancock County.

*Messrs. Axline & Betts; Mr. Smith W. Bennett*and *Mr.. Patterson A.‘Reece,*for plaintiff in error.

*577
      *Mr. Jacob Line,*for defendant in error.

Judgment reversed. Ground stated in journal entrjr.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of said circuit court be and the'same is hereby reversed, and this court proceeding to render the judgment which the circuit court should have rendered reverses the judgment of the court of common pleas on the ground that said court of common pleas erred in directing the jury to render a verdict for the defendant, Sarah E. Burson, there being evidence before the jury tending to prove each material allegation in the petition put in issue by her answer. It is the further opinion of this court that said Sarah E. Burson, as a former policy-holder, if .she was a policy-holder in said association, was not a necessary party to the action in which the receiver was appointed and the assessment made. This cause is remanded to the court of common pleas for new trial and further proceedings according to law.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### George M. WORLEY and Dorothy N. Worley, Petitioners, v. ORLANDO-ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY, etc., Respondent.

No. 44716.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 11, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIRO OBED ORELLANA-RODRIGUEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 17-73195 

Agency No. A205-004-708 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 4, 2020**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Jairo Obed Orellana-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) order dismissing his 

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 12 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-73195 

evidence the agency’s factual findings. Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 

1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. 

Orellana-Rodriguez does not challenge the agency’s determination that his 

asylum application is time-barred. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 

1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s 

opening brief are waived). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to OrellanaRodriguez’s asylum claim. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that OrellanaRodriguez failed to establish the harm he experienced or fears in Honduras was or 

would be on account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 

1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by 

criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus 

to a protected ground”). We lack jurisdiction to consider Orellana-Rodriguez’s 

contentions regarding his political opinion and the social group of government 

witnesses against criminal gangs. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 

(9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review claims not presented to the 

agency). Thus, Orellana-Rodriguez’s withholding of removal claim fails. 

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s determination that OrellanaRodriguez failed to establish eligibility for humanitarian asylum. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1208.13(b)(1)(iii). 
3 17-73195 

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief 

because Orellana-Rodriguez failed to show it is more likely than not he will be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to 

Honduras. See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009); see also 

Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder, 600 F.3d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir. 2010) (generalized 

evidence of violence and crime in petitioner’s home country was insufficient to 

meet standard for CAT relief).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Application of • 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. AND 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

Docket DOT-OST-2010- 

for exemptions under 49 U.S.C. § 40109 and designations : 

(Houston-Puebla, San Luis Potosi, Villahermosa, Puerto 

Vallarta and San Jose del Cabo, Mexico) 

APPLICATION OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. AND 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. FOR 

EXEMPTIONS, DESIGNATIONS AND 

CODESHARE NOTIFICATIONS 

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: 

Hershel I. Kamen 

Vice President, International, Regulatory 

& Policy 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. and 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

1350 I Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20005-3389 

Daniel A. Weiss 

Managing Director, International 

Policy & Regulatory Affairs 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

P.O. Box 4607 — HQSGV 

Houston, TX 77210-4607 

Thomas Newton Bolling 

Managing Attorney, Regulatory Affairs 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

P.O. Box 4607-HQSLG 

Houston, TX 77210-4607 

(713) 324-5606 

thomas.bolling@coair.com 

Todd Emerson 

General Counsel 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

444 South River Road 

St. George, Utah 84790 

(435) 634-3530 

temerson@skywest.com Gerald F. Murphy 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004-2595 

(202) 624-2615 

gmurphy@crowell.com 

Counsel for 

SkyWest Airlines, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 59579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29096]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

38 CFR Part 21

RIN 2900-AI45


Survivors and Dependents Education: Extension of Eligibility 
Period

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In a document published in the Federal Register on October 3, 
1997 (62 FR 51783), VA amended the ``Survivors' and Dependents' 
Educational Assistance Under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 35'' regulations. The 
final rule, among other things, transferred the subject matter of 
paragraph (e) of Sec. 21.3046 to a new Sec. 21.3047. Inadvertently, two 
cross-references to said paragraph (e) were not amended to reflect the 
change. Accordingly, this document corrects this error by changing the 
cross-references to refer to the new Sec. 21.3047.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 4, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June C. Schaeffer, Assistant Director 
for Policy and Program Administration, Education Service, Veterans 
Benefits Administration, 202-273-7187.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 
number for the program affected by this final rule is 64.117.

List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 21

    Administrative practice and procedure, Armed forces, Civil rights, 
Claims, Colleges and universities, Conflict of interests, Education, 
Employment, Grant programs-education, Grant programs-veterans, Health 
care, Loan programs-education, Loan programs-veterans, Manpower 
training programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Schools, 
Travel and transportation expenses, Veterans, Vocational education, 
Vocational rehabilitation.

    Approved: October 28, 1997.
Thomas O. Gessel,
Director, Office of Regulations Management, Office of General Counsel, 
Department of Veterans Affairs.
    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 38 CFR part 21, subpart 
C, is amended as set forth below.

PART 21--VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND EDUCATION

Subpart C--Survivors'--and Dependents'--Educational Assistance 
Under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 35

    1. The authority citation for subpart C continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 512, 3500-3566, unless otherwise 
noted.


Sec. 21.3046  [Amended]

    2. In Sec. 21.3046, paragraph (c)(1) is amended by removing 
``paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section'' and adding, in its place, 
``paragraph (d) of this section and Sec. 21.3047'' and paragraph 
(d)(6)(ii) is amended by removing ``or (e) of this section'' and 
adding, in its place, ``of this section or Sec. 21.3047''.

[FR Doc. 97-29096 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
Exhibit (a)(xxxi)

SCUDDER VALUE SERIES, INC.

ARTICLES SUPPLEMENTARY

 

Scudder Value Series, Inc., a Maryland corporation registered as an open-end investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (which is hereinafter called the “Corporation”), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland that:

 

FIRST:            Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 2-105(c) of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has increased the aggregate number of shares of capital stock that the Corporation has the authority to issue by three hundred million (300,000,000) shares, from three billion, five hundred million (3,500,000,000) shares to three billion, eight hundred million (3,800,000,000) shares.

 

SECOND:      Pursuant to the authority expressly vested in the Board of Directors of the Corporation by the Charter of the Corporation, the Board of Directors has duly designated and classified one hundred fifty million (150,000,000) shares of the capital stock of the Corporation resulting from the increase of authorized capital stock effected by these Articles Supplementary as a new class of shares of the “Scudder Large Cap Value Fund” series of the Corporation’s capital stock, such one hundred fifty million (150,000,000) shares being designated and classified as the "Class S Shares" of the Scudder Large Cap Value Fund.

 

THIRD:          Pursuant to the authority expressly vested in the Board of Directors of the Corporation by the Charter of the Corporation, the Board of Directors has duly designated and classified one hundred fifty million (150,000,000) shares of the capital stock of the Corporation resulting from the increase of authorized capital stock effected by these Articles Supplementary as a new class of shares of the “Scudder Large Cap Value Fund” series of the Corporation’s capital stock, such one hundred fifty million (150,000,000) shares being designated and classified as the "Class AARP Shares" of the Scudder Large Cap Value Fund.

 

FOURTH:       Immediately before the increase effected by these Articles Supplementary, the Corporation had the authority to issue three billion, five hundred million (3,500,000,000) shares of capital stock, with a par value of $.01 per share, for an aggregate par value of $35,000,000, of which:  

 

(i)  Three hundred twenty million (320,000,000) were classified as Scudder Large Cap Value Fund Class A Shares, three hundred twenty million (320,000,000) were classified as Scudder Large Cap Value Fund Class B Shares, eighty million (80,000,000) were classified as Scudder Large Cap Value Fund Class C Shares, eighty million (80,000,000) were classified as Scudder Large Cap Value Fund Class Institutional Shares, and one hundred million (100,000,000) were classified as Scudder Large Cap Value Fund Class R Shares; 

 

----