alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Muldoon, Albert (OST)

To: "mayor@saranaclakeny.gov"; "MayorRandall@villageoflakeplacid.ny.gov"; "rtbev@roadrunner.com";

"htownsupv@harrietstown.org"; "Airportmanager@harrietstown.org"; toddchristophersmith@gmail.com

Cc: Andrew Bonney; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST)

Subject: EAS at Saranac Lake/Lake Placid, NY - Request for Community Comments - Due December 4, 2013

Date: Friday, November 01, 2013 2:56:44 PM

Attachments: Cape Air SLK EAS Proposal.pdf

All,

I wanted to take this opportunity to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation

at Saranac Lake/Lake Placid, and to give you an opportunity to submit comments on the

record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and

International Affairs.

The community is currently served by Hyannis Air Service, Inc. d/b/a Cape Air (Cape Air)

which provides three daily (21 weekly) nonstop round trips to Boston. In anticipation of the

end of Cape Air’s current contract on February 28, 2014, we issued Order 2013-9-21

(September 30, 2013), soliciting proposals from carriers interested in providing EAS at

Saranac Lake/Lake Placid for a new rate term, for service levels consistent with what the

community currently receives. In response to that Order, we received one proposal, from

Cape Air, the incumbent. The proposal contained two service options, as described below.

I have briefly summarized the proposal below. A full copy of the proposal is attached to this

email and is also available online at www.regulations.gov by searching for docket:

DOT-OST-2000-8025.

Cape Air’s proposal contains two service options. All service would be provided on

nine-passenger, twin-engine Cessna 402 aircraft. Both options are offered as either two- or

four-year contracts. First, the carrier proposes to continue its current service level, providing

three daily (21 weekly) nonstop round trips to Boston for an annual subsidy of $1,891,456

(two years) or $1,832,064 (four years). The carrier’s second service option would also

provide three daily nonstop round trips to Boston, as well as additional service, one daily

nonstop round trip to the New York City area, via the Westchester County Airport. This

option would require an annual subsidy of $2,662,802 (two years) or $2,579,190 (four years).

We request that you examine the proposal carefully and contact the carrier with any

questions you may have regarding its proposal. The Department is also carefully reviewing

Cape Air’s proposal. Please provide us your comments, ranking the service options and

contract length in order of preference, no later than December 4, 2013. We will carefully

consider your comments before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for a

decision. 

Please submit your comments via email to EAS@dot.gov or by fax to (202) 366-7638. If you

have any questions, please feel free to contact A.J. Muldoon of my staff at

albert.muldoon@dot.gov or (202) 366-1058.

Regards,

Kevin Schlemmer

Chief, Essential Air Service Division
Office of Aviation Analysis
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of ESS Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Blair, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. March 16, 2005 /s/ ROBERT L. BLAIRROBERT L. BLAIRPresident and Chief Executive Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3799 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to evaluate how 

the frequency of summary notices provided to patients can be increased, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2024 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

to evaluate how the frequency of summary notices provided to patients can be increased, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Organization 

5 Report Enhancing (MORE) Summaries Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3799 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASING THE FREQUENCY OF SUMMARY NO2 TICES PROVIDED TO MEDICARE BENE3 FICIARIES. 

4 Section 1115A of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1315a) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (b)(2)(A), by adding at the 

7 end the following new sentence: ‘‘The models se8 lected under this subparagraph shall include the 

9 testing of the model described in subsection (h).’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub12 section: 

13 ‘‘(h) INCREASING THE FREQUENCY OF AND PER14 FORMING USABILITY TESTING ON SUMMARY NOTICES.— 

15 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years 

16 after the date of enactment of this subsection, the 

17 Secretary shall establish and implement a model 

18 under which— 

19 ‘‘(A) the frequency of the explanation of 

20 Medicare benefits under section 1806(a) that is 

21 provided to individuals for whom payment is 

22 made under title XVIII is increased, either by 

23 mail or virtually; and 

24 ‘‘(B) the Secretary annually performs 

25 usability testing to ensure that individuals for 

26 whom payment is made under title XVIII unVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:58 Feb 21, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3799.IS S3799

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3799 IS

1 derstand how to identify fraud based on the in2 formation provided in the explanation of Medi3 care benefits provided to such individuals under 

4 section 1806(a). 

5 ‘‘(2) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—In addition to 

6 the report required by subsection (g), not later than 

7 1 year after the date of enactment of this sub8 section, the Secretary shall submit a report to Con9 gress on the progress of the model in paragraph (1) 

10 and how such model will increase the frequency of 

11 the explanation of benefits in a timely manner.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**Public release of 2005 North American Land Cover Database at 250m spatial resolution**

The North American Land Change Monitoring System (NALCMS) is a joint project between Natural Resources Canada/Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (NRCan/CCRS), the United States Geological Survey (USGS), and three Mexican organizations: the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (*Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía*—INEGI); National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (*Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad*—CONABIO); and the National Forestry Commission of Mexico (*Comisión Nacional Forestal*—CONAFOR). The project is facilitated by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC), an international organization created under the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) by Canada, Mexico and the United States to address regional environmental concerns, help prevent potential trade and environmental conflicts and promote the effective enforcement of environmental law. 

The objective of NALCMS is to devise, through a collective effort, a harmonized multi-scale land cover monitoring framework that can be applied across North America with high accuracy meeting each countries’ specific requirements. The new 2005 Land Cover Database of North America at a spatial resolution of 250 m is the first step toward achieving this objective.

The product is based on observations acquired by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). Mapping was performed by each country using unique data pre-processing and information extraction methodologies. These national products were subsequently used to assemble an integrated North America land cover database. The classification legend is designed in three hierarchical levels, using the Food and Agriculture Organization (FOA) Land Classification System. Levels I and II are common for North America while Level III is country-specific.

Information provided by this land cover database is valuable for a range of users, including international organizations such as the United Nations Environment Programme, nongovernmental conservation organizations, land managers, and scientific researchers. The continental-scale, land cover data generated under NALCMS can be used to address issues such as climate change, carbon sequestration, biodiversity loss, and changes in ecosystem structure and function, by helping users to better understand the dynamics and continental-scale patterns of North America’s changing environment.  

**Database Access**

Mexico: http://www.inegi.org.mx

US: http://landcover.usgs.gov/NALCMS/

Canada: ftp://ccrs.nrcan.gc.ca/NALCMS/

CEC: http://www.cec.org/naatlas/

Please cite this database as: “2005 North American Land Cover at 250 m spatial resolution. Produced by Natural Resources Canada/Canadian Centre for Remote Sensing (NRCan/CCRS), United States Geological Survey (USGS); *Insituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía* (INEGI),  *Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad* (CONABIO) and *Comisión Nacional Forestal* (CONAFOR).”
n

█

n

█

"F

3050

2950

3000

2950

3050

3050

3000

3050

3050

3000

3000

3050

3050

2950

3050

3050

3000

2950

3000

2950

3050

3050

2950

3000

2950

3050

3050

3050

2900

3000

3000

2950

3000

2950

3050

Brollier Airport

£¤56

£¤56

£¤56

£¤56

£¤56

ROAD Y

5MI RD

ROAD Y

4MI RD

ROAD Y

4MI RD

6MI RD

3MI RD

ROAD V ROAD V

6MI RD

5MI RD

6MI RD

6MI RD

4MI RD

ROAD V

7MI RD

8MI RD

3MI RD

9MI RD

ROAD V

ROAD Y

9MI RD

8MI RD

2MI RD

ROAD V

9MI RD

Moscow

Cave

Moscow Wastewater

Treatment Facility

O'Dea Cem

Moscow Cem

Woods

Ryus

Moscow

Woods

NW

Wagon Bed

Spring SE

Wagon Bed

Spring

Hugoton

Moscow

NW

Moscow

SE

04

3

101°

30"

41

36

101°

01

3

06

000

41

FEET

FEET

3

38

27

09

3

41

41

29

08 520

3

41

17'

30"

41

FEET

FEET

06

41

04

12'

30

28

20'

000mE

28

101°

17'

09

37

3

3 01

32

10'

41

000m

41

41

000

07'

29

000

41

3

41

41

3

3 3

07'

37°

37

07

35

3

41

3

30" 000

25

10 3

33

37°

31

05

30"

41

41

3

10'

41

26

15'

000m

41

3

15'

540

3

08

41

34

000m

30"

36

35

37°

41

3

38

32

3 12' 540

03

07

30"

580

1

15'

30"

20'

E

41

22'

101°

N

03

02

27

02

3

22'

1

N

41

11

37°

3

41

10

41

15'

30" 05

41

11

30

3

31

33

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

KANSAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

MOSCOW, KS

2012

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

MOSCOW QUADRANGLE

KANSAS-STEVENS CO.

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.4

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Imagery......................................................NAIP, July 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2012

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 2006

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 14S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Kansas Coordinate System of 1983 (south

zone)

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

LG

14S

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2012 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 19 ́

24 MILS

6° 35 ́

117 MILS
Exhibit 32CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, John C. East, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Actel Corporation on Form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended January 1, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Reporton Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Actel Corporation.                By: /s/ John C. East             John C. East      Chief Executive Officer      Actel Corporation       I, Jon A. Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Actel Corporation on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such AnnualReport on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Actel Corporation.                By: /s/ Jon A. Anderson             Jon A. Anderson      Chief Financial Officer      Actel Corporation
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cindy J. McPike, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 6, 2004



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cindy J. McPike                       
|Cindy J. McPike                           
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH WHITE ROCK ENTERPRISES, LTD.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-08-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,489
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,489
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            8,160
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,060)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,489
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,611
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,611)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,611)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
Date,"5 YR","7 YR","10 YR","20 YR","30 YR"
02/23/2024,1.94,1.95,1.96,2.05,2.11
02/22/2024,1.96,1.98,2.02,2.12,2.19
02/21/2024,1.91,1.94,1.98,2.11,2.18
02/20/2024,1.88,1.91,1.95,2.08,2.17
02/16/2024,1.91,1.93,1.97,2.09,2.17
02/15/2024,1.87,1.90,1.94,2.07,2.16
02/14/2024,1.91,1.94,1.97,2.10,2.18
02/13/2024,1.98,1.99,2.02,2.13,2.20
02/12/2024,1.86,1.89,1.93,2.06,2.15
02/09/2024,1.86,1.89,1.92,2.05,2.13
02/08/2024,1.84,1.87,1.91,2.04,2.12
02/07/2024,1.80,1.83,1.86,2.00,2.08
02/06/2024,1.79,1.81,1.85,1.98,2.06
02/05/2024,1.87,1.88,1.90,2.01,2.09
02/02/2024,1.80,1.81,1.82,1.93,2.02
02/01/2024,1.63,1.65,1.68,1.82,1.91
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of FX Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David N. Pierce, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/ David N. Pierce

David N. Pierce

Chief Executive Officer

March 12, 2007

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2812]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Proposed Generic Communication; Degradation of Steam Generator 
Internals

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 31, 1996 (61 FR 69116), the NRC published for 
public comment a proposed generic letter concerning the importance of 
performing comprehensive examinations of steam generator internals to 
ensure steam generator tube structural integrity is maintained in 
accordance with the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR part 50. The 
generic letter will enable the NRC to verify whether or not the 
condition of addressees' steam generator internals comply and conform 
with the current licensing basis for their respective facilities. The 
comment period for this proposed generic letter was originally 
scheduled to expire on January 30, 1997. In a letter dated January 27, 
1997, the Nuclear Energy Institute requested a 45-day extension of the 
comment period to permit sufficient time to reach consensus on a 
coordinated industry response. In response to this request, the NRC has 
decided to extend the comment period.

DATES: The comment period has been extended 45 days and will now expire 
on March 15, 1997. Comments submitted after this date will be 
considered if it is practical to do so, but assurance of consideration 
cannot be given except for comments received on or before this date.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to Chief, Rules Review and 
Directives Branch, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop T-6D-
69, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Written comments may also be delivered 
to 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, from 7:30 am to 4:15 pm, 
Federal workdays. Copies of written comments received may be examined 
at the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, N.W. (Lower Level), 
Washington, D.C.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie M. Coffin (301) 415-2778.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of January, 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Thomas T. Martin,
Director, Division of Reactor Program Management, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-2812 Filed 2-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit
23.02








Hohn Engineering,PLLC2708
      1st Avenue North, Suite 200Billings,
      MT  59101Tel
      406-655-3381
            Fax
      406-655-3383
            Email:
      hohneng@hohneng.com




















CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS








We hereby
consent to the use of the name Hohn Engineering, PLLC and of references to Hohn
Engineering, PLLC and to the inclusion of and references to our report, or
information contained therein, dated February 16, 2010, prepared for FX
Energyin the FX
Energy, Inc. annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended 31st December
2009, and the incorporation by reference to the report prepared by Hohn
Engineering, PLLC into FX
Energy, Inc.'s previously filed registration statements listed
below:








Form
            SEC File No.
            Effective DateS-3
            333-155718
            June
      29, 2009S-8
            333-112717
            February
      11, 2004S-8
            333-128299
            September
      14, 2005








HOHN
ENGINEERING, PLLC





/s/ Thomas K.
HohnThomas K. Hohn


Registered
Professional Petroleum Engineer


March 16,
2010