alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3639 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 326
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3639

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2075 West Stadium Boulevard in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as the ``Robert 
                         Hayden Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 23, 2024

  Mr. Peters (for himself and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                            February 6, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2075 West Stadium Boulevard in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as the ``Robert 
                         Hayden Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT HAYDEN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2075 West Stadium Boulevard in Ann Arbor, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Robert Hayden Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert 
Hayden Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 326

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3639

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2075 West Stadium Boulevard in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as the ``Robert 
                         Hayden Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 6, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  54,662
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,702
<INVENTORY>                                    50,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              113,142
<PP&E>                                         23,249
<DEPRECIATION>                                  9,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                134,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          41,126
<BONDS>                                        40,078
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           65
<OTHER-SE>                                     48,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  134,940
<SALES>                                       103,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              103,388
<CGS>                                          85,085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  85,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  113
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,867
<INCOME-TAX>                                      762
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,105
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,105
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .17



</TABLE>
July 31, 2013

Mr. James Whedbee

5816 NE. Buttonwood Tree Lane

Gladstone, MO 64119

Dear Mr. Whedbee:

This is in response to your March 23, 2013 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2013-

0305) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration to amend part 71, Subpart E of Title 

14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The petition for rulemaking requested an 

amendment to address airspace changes resulting from the closure of certain air traffic 

control towers. Specifically, you request that when tower closures are planned for a 

temporary period, the associated Class D airspace area would revert to a Class E surface area.

As stated in your petition, the FAA was preparing to close numerous air traffic control towers 

at locations across the country due to budget cuts anticipated as a result of sequestration. On 

May 1, 2013, Congress enacted the Reducing Flight Delays Act of 2013 (Pub. L. No. 113-9, 

127 Stat. 443). The Act provides the Secretary of Transportation (the Secretary) with 

discretion to transfer up to $253 million from funds "available for obligation in [fiscal year 

2013] as discretionary grants-in-aid for airports pursuant to section 47117(f) of Title 49, 

United States Code" or "any other program or account of the [FAA]" to "appropriations 

accounts providing for the operations of the [FAA]," to the extent that the Secretary 

determines the transfer of funds "to be necessary to prevent reduced operations and staffing 

of the [FAA] during fiscal year 2013 to ensure a safe and efficient air transportation system" 

(Pub. L. No. 113-9, § 2(a), (c), 127 Stat. 443-44). On May 10, 2013, the Secretary announced 

that he had determined that the new legislation would allow FAA to transfer sufficient funds 

to continue funding the 149 contract towers, and the towers would thus remain funded for the 

remainder of fiscal year 2013. 

When the FAA responds to petitions for rulemaking, it must follow the requirements of 

14 CFR part 11, particularly those guidelines for processing petitions for rulemaking found in 

§ 11.73. As stated in that section, the FAA uses the following criteria when making a 

decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking: 

1) the immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises;

2) the priority of other FAA issues; and
2

3) the resources we have available to address these issues.

While the issues raised in your petition may have merit, they do not address an immediate 

safety concern. Therefore, this request is denied. Your comment and reasons for a rule 

change will be considered if the agency undertakes future rulemaking in this area. 

Accordingly, Docket No. FAA-2013-0305 is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ellen Crum

Manager, Airspace and

Rules Team
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: National  compensation survey. State and local government. Jacksonville,  FL [electronic resource].
SuDocs Number: L 2.121/9:J 13/
Item    Number: 0768-B-05    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000867885
 
 
 
2007
2008
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  May 19, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
39 (ani

34°50'N

39 p 00m)

67°30°E

67°40°E

67°50°'E

1
'
A
- a
“>
- »
-
i _—
— ‘he

ti r : A
si . ay, ee Ve e
- 4 ~ ~
ai . j <<" . « {
y f 1 . 4 i m
- 4 4 1 m =. 4 is , " F 2
» 4 ; Py : 1 ‘
, al Se i
eS eee see descrese--- a.
’ _ - a :
4 1 : 1 }
é . j 1
1: 1 ® % r
‘ id ; 1 | hs
# 1 1
a t 1 7
- / 1 ;
‘ . -

ae

EXPLANATIO
—— Road “
—-— Stream, mostly intermittant [|

O City, town, or village
—- Province boundary

Peak
Image quadrant or tile

10 KILOMETERS

[——

5 MILES
Compensation of Directors



Exhibit (10)(i) 
 
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS 
 
December 5, 2002 
 
WHEREAS, Article IV, Section 10 of the corporation’s By-Laws states: “The board of directors shall have the authority to fix the
compensation of directors.”; 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that effective January 1, 2003, the compensation of the outside directors of this corporation shall be: 
 

	 	1.	 	An annual retainer fee in the sum of $24,000, irrespective of attendance at meetings of the board of directors; and 

 
In addition, an annual retainer fee for the vice chair in the sum of
$15,000, irrespective of attendance at meetings of the board of directors; and 
 

	 	2.	 	An annual retainer fee in the sum of $5,000 for the chair of the audit committee, irrespective of attendance at committee meetings; and 

 
In addition, an annual retainer fee in the sum of $3,000 for the chairs
of the board’s other standing committees, irrespective of attendance at committee meetings; and 
 

	 	3.	 	An additional fee in the sum of $1,200 for each meeting of the board of directors attended; and 

 

	 	4.	 	An additional fee for committee members in the sum of $1,200 for each meeting of a committee of the board of directors attended; and 

 

	 	5.	 	Reimbursement for all expenses incidental to attendance at a meeting of the board of directors or a meeting of a committee of the board of directors, and for any other expense
incurred on behalf of the corporation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                                          0000907127
<NAME>                                         Medcom USA, Incorporated
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,043,603
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,189,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                   269,810
<INVENTORY>                                    219,953
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,170,290
<PP&E>                                         6,159,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,995,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,149,273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,775,029
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    33
<COMMON>                                       3,182
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,146,981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15,149,273
<SALES>                                        3,253,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,253,489
<CGS>                                          1,559,548
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,985,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               14,576
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,306,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   45,290
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,351,901)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (879,128)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,231,029)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.34)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,950,244
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,439,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                   165,578
<INVENTORY>                                    476,948
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,212,352
<PP&E>                                     107,981,984
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,125,039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              96,731,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,720,181
<BONDS>                                     52,309,785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        95,363
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,358,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                96,731,960
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,510,532
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,697,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,616,722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,222,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,680,739
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,920,957
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,759,782
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,759,782
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6429

HERBERT HIGHTOWER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Commissioner; ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-97-490-5-23JI)

Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herbert Hightower, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge

recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive

appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to file timely

objections in the district court. Thus, the district court, after

reviewing the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, adopted

the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and dismissed the

case. Appellant appeals. The filing of timely objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation is necessary to preserve

appellate review of the substance of the report. See United States

v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Because Appellant

failed to filed objections after receiving notification of the need

to file such objections, he waived his right to appellate review.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. Hightower v. Moore, No. CA-97-490-5-23JI (D.S.C. Mar. 3,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.3



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K/A), I, David K. Grant, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: October 14, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ David K. Grant                   
|David K. Grant                       
|President and Chief Operating Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Telegen Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Richard Herring,
      Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer, and Matthew DeVries,
      Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
      pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      December 6, 2006








/s/
      Richard Herring


Richard
      Herring


Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer








/s/
      Matthew DeVries


Matthew
      DeVries


Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit (a)(xxxii)

SCUDDER VALUE SERIES, INC.

ARTICLES SUPPLEMENTARY

 

Scudder Value Series, Inc., a Maryland corporation registered as an open-end investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (which is hereinafter called the “Corporation”), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland that:

 

FIRST:            Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 2-105(c) of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has increased the aggregate number of shares of capital stock that the Corporation has the authority to issue by three hundred million (300,000,000) shares, from three billion, eight hundred million (3,800,000,000) shares to four billion, one hundred million (4,100,000,000) shares.

 

SECOND:      Pursuant to the authority expressly vested in the Board of Directors of the Corporation by the Charter of the Corporation, the Board of Directors has duly designated and classified one hundred fifty million (150,000,000) shares of the capital stock of the Corporation resulting from the increase of authorized capital stock effected by these Articles Supplementary as a new class of shares of the “Scudder-Dreman High Return Equity Fund” series of the Corporation’s capital stock, such one hundred fifty million (150,000,000) shares being designated and classified as the "Class S Shares" of the Scudder-Dreman High Return Equity Fund.

 

THIRD:          Pursuant to the authority expressly vested in the Board of Directors of the Corporation by the Charter of the Corporation, the Board of Directors has duly designated and classified one hundred fifty million (150,000,000) shares of the capital stock of the Corporation resulting from the increase of authorized capital stock effected by these Articles Supplementary as a new class of shares of the “Scudder-Dreman Small Cap Value Fund” series of the Corporation’s capital stock, such one hundred fifty million (150,000,000) shares being designated and classified as the "Class S Shares" of the Scudder-Dreman Small Cap Value Fund.

 

FOURTH:       (a) Immediately before the increase effected by these Articles Supplementary, the Corporation had the authority to issue three billion eight hundred million (3,800,000,000) shares of capital stock, with a par value of $.01 per share, for an aggregate par value of $38,000,000, of which:  

 

(i)  Three hundred twenty million (320,000,000) were classified as Scudder Large Cap Value Fund Class A Shares, three hundred twenty million (320,000,000) were classified as Scudder Large Cap Value Fund Class B Shares, eighty million (80,000,000) were classified as Scudder Large Cap Value Fund Class C Shares, eighty million (80,000,000) were classified as Scudder Large Cap Value Fund Class Institutional Shares, one hundred million (100,000,000) were classified as Scudder Large Cap Value Fund Class R Shares; one hundred fifty million (150,000,000) were classified as Scudder Large Cap Value Fund Class S Shares; 

 

----