alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
About the Capital Purchase Program Monthly Lending Report 

What is the Capital Purchase Program Monthly Lending Report? 

The Capital Purchase Program (CPP) Monthly Lending Report (“Report”) is a survey designed to 

provide insight into the lending activities of all current participants in the CPP. Through the CPP, the 

Treasury Department (Treasury) invests in viable banks to stabilize the financial system by building up 

the capital bases of banks, enabling continued lending and economic recovery. Strong capital levels 

enable banks to continue to play their vital roles in communities as providers of credit to businesses and 

consumers. Since the inception of the CPP in October 2008, Treasury has invested in over 600 banks of 

all sizes in 48 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia. 

Why produce the CPP Monthly Lending Report? 

Treasury is committed to ensuring transparency and has taken a number of initiatives to ensure greater 

communication about all programs established under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) and 

the Financial Stability Plan. Along with the Monthly Lending and Intermediation Snapshot of the top 21 

CPP participants, which Treasury launched in January 2009, the CPP Monthly Lending Report 

increases transparency by making information available about lending at CPP banks. The relatively 

high frequency of reporting is designed to facilitate more rapid feedback and trend analysis on lending 

than would be possible through other sources. 

What information is included in the CPP Monthly Lending Report? 

Treasury requested that CPP recipients report three data points on a monthly basis: (1) Average 

Consumer Loans Outstanding; (2) Average Commercial Loans Outstanding; and (3) Total Loans 

Outstanding (this figure should be the sum of Consumer Loans Outstanding and Commercial Loans 

Outstanding). The category of Consumer Loans generally includes loans used for personal, family, or 

household uses including residential mortgages, home equity, US card, and other consumer loans such 

as auto, student loans, and other consumer loans. The category of Commercial Loans generally 

includes loans for commercial and industrial purposes to sole proprietorships, partnerships, 

corporations, and other business enterprises, whether secured or unsecured, single payment, or 

installment. They also should include loans to individuals for commercial, industrial, and professional 

purposes, but not for investment or personal expenditure purposes. These loans generally include 

commercial and industrial (C&I), small business, and commercial real estate (CRE). 

Individual banks may provide a more detailed description of each of the loan categories in the “Key” 

section that corresponds to each of the line items. Banks that included month-end figures in lieu of 

average figures may note that in the “Key” section that corresponds to each of the line items. 

In addition to the line items, the Report includes an optional “General Market Commentary” section, 

where banks may provide insight into market conditions.
Amendment Two to Employment Agreement - Nussbaum



EXHIBIT 10.5 (iii) 
 
AMENDMENT TWO 
TO 
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 
Effective January 1, 2003, this AMENDMENT TWO TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT by and between Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., an Indiana insurance company (the “Company”), and Samuel R. Nussbaum, M.D. (the “Executive”) hereby amends the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) between
the parties dated as of the 2nd day of January, 2001, as follows: 
 

	1.	 	Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the termination date and inserting in place thereof the 31st day of December, 2004. 

 

	2.	 	The first paragraph of Section 11 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the provision “one (1) year” and inserting in place thereof “eighteen
(18) months.” 

 

	3.	 	Section 16(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the provision “one (1) year” and inserting in place thereof “eighteen (18) months.”


 

	4.	 	All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have duly executed this AMENDMENT TWO TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT effective as of the day and year first above written. 
 
 

	 Samuel R. Nussbaum, M.D.
  
	 	 	 	 Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.
  

	
	 /s/    Samuel R. Nussbaum, M.D.
	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/    Larry C. Glasscock

	
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	  
 Name: Larry C. Glasscock
  
 Title: President and CEO
<Page>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.1(r)

ADDENDUM TO THE EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (THE "AGREEMENT") BETWEEN
SAUER-DANFOSS INC., USA (THE "COMPANY") AND VICE PRESIDENT THOMAS KITTEL, BOEKER
STIEG, 11, 24613 AUKRUG, GERMANY (THE EXECUTIVE").

EFFECTIVE FROM DECEMBER 1, 2002, THE PARTIES AGREE TO REGULATE THE
ABOVE-MENTIONED AGREEMENT ON THE FOLLOWING CLAUSES:

CLAUSE 3
Serving as the Vice President of the Company's Hydraustatics European Business
Unit, the Executive at the same time takes up the position as Managing Director
("Geschaftsfuhrer") of Sauer-Danfoss (Neumunster) GmbH & Co. OHG, Krokamp 35,
24531 Neumunster, Germany.
The Executive reports directly to the Company's Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer.

CLAUSE 5a
The salary is to be paid out by Sauer-Danfoss (Neumunster) GmbH & Co. OHG in
accordance with the practices valid for Sauer-Danfoss (Neumunster) GmbH & Co.
OHG.

CLAUSE 5c
Reimbursement of out-of pocket expenses shall be in accordance with the policies
as determined by Sauer-Danfoss (Neumunster) GmbH & Co. OHG.

CLAUSE 5d,e
As stated in the Agreement, the Executive shall participate in the annual and
long term incentive plans as provided to senior executives of the Company. As
all other benefit plans and perquisites granted to the Executive shall be
according to the policies valid for Sauer-Danfoss (Neumunster) GmbH & Co. OHG.

CLAUSE 5f
The Executive shall be entitled to vacations according to German law, and the
Executive shall be entitled to holidays according to German customs and as
decided by Sauer-Danfoss (Neumunster) GmbH & Co. OHG.

CLAUSE 6
Any payment made to Executive under Section 6 for Base Salary and Target
Incentive Opportunity shall in every respect compensate for any claims which the
Executive might be entitled under any mandatory legal provision.

CLAUSE 6b
The Executive's employment shall terminate without notice at the end of the
month in which the Executive attains the age of 65 years.

CLAUSE 6d,f
No payment or benefit shall be reduced if such reduction is contrary to any
mandatory legal provision.

<Page>

CLAUSE 23
In all rights and duties connected with seniority, the executive's entry date
shall be counted from February 1, 1988.

In case of any conflict between the Agreement and this addendum, the addendum
shall be valid.


                                                 EXECUTIVE

                                                 By:
                                                     ---------------------------


                                                 SAUER-DANFOSS INC.

                                                 By:
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                 Name:
                                                 Title:
No. 9693.

#### Cordray *v.*Cordray et al.

(Decided February 5, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Muskingum County.

*Messrs. Vandenbark & Vandenbark; Mr. S. M. Winn*and *Mr. John C. Bassett, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. C. C. Lemert,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.B**
**Certification**
I, D. Dwight Scott, certify that:
1. I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of El Paso CGP Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 20, 2005                 /s/ D. Dwight Scott   D. Dwight Scott    Executive Vice President and
#### Charles R. ROGERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-54.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 11, 1970.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PIERCE, Judge.

Appellant Charles R. Rogers appeals an order denying a motion for post-conviction relief brought under CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S. A.

Rogers was informed against in the Criminal Court of Record for Hills-borough County for the offense of breaking and entering a business building with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Upon plea of guilty he was sentenced to a term in the State Prison. Thereafter he filed a motion to vacate the judgment and sentence. The trial court denied the motion and he appeals to this Court from the order of denial. The ground of the motion was that the statute under which Rogers was charged, F.S. § 810.05, F.S.A., “is unconstitutional and of no legal foundation”.

Rogers obviously relies upon the dissenting opinion of Judge McCain of the 4th District Court in the case of Brown *119v. State, Fla.App., 232 So.2d 55. But the Supreme Court of Florida, upon further review of the same case, Brown v. State, 237 So.2d 129, 1970, specifically overruled Judge McCain’s dissenting opinion, holding that an indictment or information charging a crime in essentially the same language as used in the instant case sufficiently stated a felony.

This disposes of the only question relied upon here, and the order appealed from is therefore—

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and MANN, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL SINFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF THE BILTMORE GROUP OF LOUISIANA,
L.L.C. DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERANCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.

INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THIS SCHEDULE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
NECESSASRY AND SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUCTION WITH THE COMPLETE UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 INCLUDING FOOTNOTES.

</LEGEND>

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                   189,080
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         189,080
<PP&E>                                 8,010,467
<DEPRECIATION>                            38,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         8,163,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  5,762,837
<BONDS>                                1,332,583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,112,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           8,163,671
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          52,414
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         179,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        17,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (127,235)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.11)


</TABLE>
# L_2005157EN.01001001.xml

| 21.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 157/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/10

---

NOTICE CONCERNING THE ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE TREATY OF ACCESSION

Subject to the ratification procedure, the Treaty of Accession will enter into force on 1 January 2007, unless a decision of the Council is taken under Article 4(2) thereof to postpone the date of accession for Bulgaria and/or Romania until 1 January 2008.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61297-61301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29063]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 98-07]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. J Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 98-07, with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Certification Under Section 620C(d) of the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961.

    Dated: October 29, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000-04-M

[[Page 61298]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17NO97.032



[[Page 61299]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17NO97.033



[[Page 61300]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17NO97.034



[[Page 61301]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17NO97.035



[FR Doc. 97-29063 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-C
## Q500 Owner Maintenance Procedures

All maintenance will be performed in accordance with the manufacturer’s requirements, safe - operating practices and per the operator’s maintenance procedures as described herein. The Aircraft log sheet will be closed and a new log sheet created after 7 days ending at 2400 hours on Sunday on a weekly basis. Pre -flight inspe ction per the operator’s checklist required before each flight. The operator requires an inspection signoff; once daily on the day that the aircraft is intended to be flown prior to flight. Discrepancies and deficiencies will be noted in the aircraft l ogbook to include an Item number, Date and time, Discrepancy, Persons name and Certificate number. The aircraft will not be flown until the Discrepancy is corrected and signed off by the operator or authorized repair person, listing the Item number, Date and Time, the corrective action taken and the person’s signature performing the corrective action. All airframe, ground station and component items are per the manufacturer, on - condition and time limits will be set as the needed. As preventative maintenance the operator elects to time limit propeller O - rings to a maximum of 4 calendar weeks of installation. O - rings will be removed and replaced at that time interval or upon condition with an equivalent or higher quality O - ring than that supplied by the manufacturer. All four O rings will be replaced anytime a replacement is performed. An appropriate entry will be made noting the flight time since last change and the installation date and time. Weekly, beginning at the start of a new week the propeller shaft threads will have a small amount of anti - seize applied to the propeller hub threads to prevent galling and propeller seizure. Propellers will be installed by turning the propeller in the proper direction until contact is made with the O - ring, then one full and a half turn will be made to properly seat the propellers on the shaft. This is per the manufacturer’s recommendation. This maintenance procedure list will be updated and amended as necessary.
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of RedCell Power Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Cameron King, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Cameron King___

Cameron King

Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer

December 16, 2005
FHWA-SA-21-042

Roundabouts

The modern roundabout is an intersection with a circular configuration that 

safely and efficiently moves traffic. Roundabouts feature channelized, curved 

approaches that reduce vehicle speed, entry yield control that gives right-ofway to circulating traffic, and counterclockwise flow around a central island 

that minimizes conflict points. The net result of lower speeds and reduced 

conflicts at roundabouts is an environment where crashes that cause injury or 

fatality are substantially reduced. 

Roundabouts are not only a safer 

type of intersection; they are also 

efficient in terms of keeping people 

moving. Even while calming traffic, 

they can reduce delay and queuing 

when compared to other intersection 

alternatives. Furthermore, the lower 

vehicular speeds and reduced 

conflict environment can create 

a more suitable environment for 

walking and bicycling.

Roundabouts can be implemented 

in both urban and rural areas under 

a wide range of traffic conditions. 

They can replace signals, twoway stop controls, and all-way 

stop controls. Roundabouts are an 

effective option for managing speed 

and transitioning traffic from highspeed to low-speed environments, 

such as freeway interchange ramp 

terminals, and rural intersections 

along high-speed roads. 

Example of a single-lane roundabout. Source: FHWA

Illustration of a multilane roundabout. 

Source: FHWA 

Two-Way Stop-Controlled 

Intersection to a Roundabout

82%

reduction in fatal 

and injury crashes.1

Signalized Intersection to a 

Roundabout

78%

reduction in fatal 

and injury crashes.1

Safety Benefits:

1 (CMF ID: 211,226) AASHTO. The Highway Safety Manual, American Association 

of State Highway Transportation Professionals, Washington, D.C., (2010).

OFFICE OF SAFETY

Proven Safety 

Countermeasures

78%

reduction in fatal 

and injury crashes.1

For more information on this 

and other FHWA Proven 

Safety Countermeasures, 

please visit https://highways.

dot.gov/safety/provensafety-countermeasures and 

https://highways.dot.gov/ 

safety/intersection-safety/ 

intersection-types/roundabouts.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ MELVIN N. O'HARA,

Claimant

- Appellant

,

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, Secretary of Veterans Affairs , Respondent

- Appellee

.

______________________

2014

- 7072

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 12

- 3272, Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M ARK R. L IPPMAN , The Veterans Law Group, of La Jolla, California, argued for claimant

- appellant.

M ARTIN M. T OMLINSON , Attorney, Commercial Litig ation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent

appellee. With him on the brief were S TUART F. D ELERY , Assistant Attorney General, R OBERT E. K IRSCHMAN , J R ., Director, and M ARTIN F. H OCKEY , J R

. , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were Y. K EN L EE , Deputy Assis-tant General Counsel, and M ARTIE A DELMAN , Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Was hington, DC.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, O’M ALLEY and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 11, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
No. 9862.

#### Lutz *v.*Godfrey et al.

(Decided January 22, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Richland County.

*Messrs. Douglass &*Workman, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. McCray &*McCray, for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.