alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Helen Louise ALTERMAN, Appellant, v. Sidney ALTERMAN, Appellee.

No. 77-1466.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 18, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 6, 1978.

Hilton R. Carr, Jr., and L. J. Cushman, Miami, for appellant.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Knight and Harold L. Ward, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff below, brings this interlocutory appeal from an order of the *774trial court granting appellee’s, defendant below, motion to quash a notice to produce documents at the taking of his deposition. We affirm.

Appellant and appellee were granted a divorce on November 13, 1963. At that time appellant was awarded $600 per month alimony. On September 21, 1976, appellant filed a petition for modification seeking an increase in the alimony award from $600 to $2000 per month. Pursuant to that action, appellant served appellee with a notice to produce certain documents relating to his financial status. Appellee filed a response to the petition and a motion to quash the notice to produce. On June 2, 1977, the trial court entered an order granting appel-lee’s motion to quash. From this order appellant appeals.

Appellant’s basic point on appeal is that the trial court erred in entering the order granting appellee’s motion to quash the notice to produce.

In support of her position, appellant relies upon *Orlowitz v. Orlowitz,*199 So.2d 97 (Fla.1967), and *Parker v. Parker,*182 So.2d 498 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966). In our opinion, the *Orlowitz*and *Parker*cases are inapplicable to the facts of the instant action. In both of those cases, the discovery sought related to the many facets of the financial matters pertaining to an original divorce action, whereas, in the instant case the sole issue before the trial court was the propriety of an increase in the amount of appellant’s alimony which had been awarded approximately 14 years earlier in the original divorce proceeding between the parties. In the instant action, appellee responded unequivocally to appellant’s petition that he was financially able to pay the increase in alimony sought by appellant. Based on the record, neither the question of appellee’s ability to pay nor the concerns catalogued in *Parker,*at 500-01, are present. The only question is whether appellant is entitled to an increase in her alimony payments.

As'stated by the Supreme Court of Florida in *Orlowitz,*at 98, a trial court possesses broad discretion in granting or denying motions in discovery matters. The Court went on to say that “[tjhere are no doubt many instances in which a court should exercise its power to protect a party against an unwarranted disclosure of the details of his financial holdings.” In our opinion, based on the record before us, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in entering the order appealed; therefore, it is affirmed. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(c). See also *Ortiz v. Ortiz,*194 So.2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967).

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1 – CEO
Certification








ROYAL INVEST
INTERNATIONAL CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Invest
International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Gruenbaum, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.








By: /s/ Jerry
Gruenbaum


Jerry
Gruenbaum, CEO





August
14, 2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134114 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134114 

 COA: 272387 

Washtenaw CC: 96-006409-FC 

MICHAEL BERNARD LITTLE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1658 

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to promote a 

high-quality workforce in the child welfare system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2021 

Ms. SHERRILL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act 

to promote a high-quality workforce in the child welfare 

system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROMOTING A HIGH-QUALITY WORKFORCE IN 

4 THE CHILD WELFARE SYSTEM. 

5 Section 105(a) of the Child Abuse Prevention and 

6 Treatment Act (42 U.S.C. 5106(a)) is amended by strik7 ing paragraph (4) and inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(4) PROMOTING A HIGH-QUALITY WORK9 FORCE.—The Secretary may award grants under 

10 this subsection to entities to carry out programs or 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1658 IH

1 strategies that promote a high-quality workforce in 

2 the child welfare system through— 

3 ‘‘(A) improvements to recruitment, sup4 port, or retention efforts; or 

5 ‘‘(B) education for professionals and para6 professionals in the prevention, identification, 

7 and treatment of child abuse and neglect.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [4910-13-Pj

ONCI)""f."US lII'''(;S'·'''>o:Jt. Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 (Docket No. FAA-2008-1 080; Directorate Identifier 2008-l\TJ\!1-118-AD) RJN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mo EMB-135BJ Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Supplemental notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening ofcomm period. SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier NPRM for the products listed above. This aeti revises the earlier NPRM by expanding the scope. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (MeAT) originated by an aviation authority of another country 10identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The earlier MeAl, Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2007-08-01, effective September 27,2007, describes the unsafe condition as: Fuel system reassessment, performed according lo REHA-E88/SF AR-88 (Reglliamento Brasileiro de Homologacao Aeronalltica 88/Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88), requires the inclusion ofnew maintenance tasks inthe Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL) and inthe Fuel System Limitations (FSL), necessary to preclude ignition sources inthe fuel system. 

## *** 

## lIIP-T 

# T.

"mAL':'''' 

## (' .C<..v......- n 

# 7(H/I.
<HINCSY"""'.



## -/1'(

OUTIN(;''''''''''.

unNGSYlI I..
#### Rodney FONTENOT and Gregory K. Fontenot v. Margaret K. PETMECKY et al.

No. 62138.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: Rodney Fontenot and Gregory K. Fontenot applying for writ of certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Allen.

Writ denied.
# L_2005099EN.01001001.xml

| 19.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 99/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 99/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 601/2005

of 18 April 2005

amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 866/2004 on a regime under Article 2 of Protocol No 10 to the Act of Accession

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Protocol No 10 on Cyprus to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 866/2004 of 29 April 2004 on a regime under Article 2 of Protocol No 10 to the Act of Accession (2), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 866/2004 lays down a list of crossing points at which persons and goods may cross the line between the areas under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus and those areas in which the Government of the Republic of Cyprus does not exercise effective control. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 866/2004 lays down a list of crossing points at which persons and goods may cross the line between the areas under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus and those areas in which the Government of the Republic of Cyprus does not exercise effective control.

| (2) | Following agreement on the opening of new crossing points in Zodia and Ledra Street, it is necessary to adapt Annex I. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following agreement on the opening of new crossing points in Zodia and Ledra Street, it is necessary to adapt Annex I.

| (3) | The Government of the Republic of Cyprus gave its agreement to this adaptation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Government of the Republic of Cyprus gave its agreement to this adaptation.

| (4) | The Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce was consulted on this matter, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce was consulted on this matter,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 866/2004 is replaced by the following:

‘ANNEX I

List of crossing points referred to in Article 2(4)

| — | Agios Dhometios |
| --- | --- |

—

Agios Dhometios

| — | Ledra Palace |
| --- | --- |

—

Ledra Palace

| — | Ledra Street |
| --- | --- |

—

Ledra Street

| — | Zodia.’ |
| --- | --- |

—

Zodia.’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 April 2005.

For the Commission

Olli REHN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 955.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 128.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28684]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 13, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Billy Matthews, Abbeville, Louisiana; to retain voting shares of 
Vermilion Bancshares Corporation, Kaplan, Louisiana, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Vermillion Bank & Trust Company, Kaplan, Louisiana.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Margaret Mary Kerndt, Fair Oakes, California; to acquire voting 
shares of Kerndt Bank Services, Inc., Lansing, Iowa, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Kerndt Brothers Savings Bank, Lansing, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 24, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-28684 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1658 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1658

  To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to promote a 
          high-quality workforce in the child welfare system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2021

 Ms. Sherrill introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to promote a 
          high-quality workforce in the child welfare system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROMOTING A HIGH-QUALITY WORKFORCE IN THE CHILD WELFARE 
              SYSTEM.

    Section 105(a) of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (42 
U.S.C. 5106(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the 
following:
            ``(4) Promoting a high-quality workforce.--The Secretary 
        may award grants under this subsection to entities to carry out 
        programs or strategies that promote a high-quality workforce in 
        the child welfare system through--
                    ``(A) improvements to recruitment, support, or 
                retention efforts; or
                    ``(B) education for professionals and 
                paraprofessionals in the prevention, identification, 
                and treatment of child abuse and neglect.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ex parte Jonathan VAN PELT.

77-385.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 31, 1978.

FAULKNER, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
STATE OF MARYLAND 

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 

MARTIN O'MALLEY 

GOVERNOR 

STATEHOUSE 

100 STATE CIRCLE 

ANNAPOLIS. MARYlAND 21401·1925 

(4101974·3901 

(roLL FREEl 1-800-811·8336 

TTY USERS CALL VIA MD RELA Y 

May 27,2010 

Shawn M. Garvin, Administrator 

EPA Region III (3RAOO) 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia P A 19103 

Dear Administrator Garvin: 

The State of Maryland is requesting that the site known as the ··Dwyer Property" located north ofthe comer 

of Maryland Routes 549 and 275 in Elkton, Cecil County, Maryland be placed on the National Priorities 

List. The site was used beginning in the 1930s to produce fireworks and later manufacture of explosives 

and munitions. Similar activities continued at the site through 1972. These activities have resulted in 

groundwater contamination related to volatile organic compounds, chlorinated solvents and other pollutants. 

To date, the Department has not identified a responsible party for the site. Cleanup through the National 

Priorities List Program will ensure protection ofpublic health and Maryland's waterways. 

The Maryland Department ofthe Environment has provided the necessary information for your agency to 

complete the scoring package and the preliminary score for the site exceeds the necessary minimum score of 

28.5. As such, Maryland supports the listing process and concurs with the decision to place the site on the 

NPL. 

I f you would like to discuss this further, please contact Secretary Shari T. Wilson ofthe Maryland 

Department of the Environment at 410-537-3084, toll free 800-633-6101. by mail at 1800 WashinbJton 

Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21230 or bye-mail atstwilson@mde.state.md.us. 

Enclosure 

cc: Shari T. Wilson. Secretary. Maryland Department ofthe Environment
# L_2005216EN.01001901.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 216/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 216/19

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1355/2005 of 18 August 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 214, 19 August 2005
  )

On page 2, the Annex should read as follows:

‘ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 18 August 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | 052 | 66,7 |
| 999 | 66,7 |
| 0707 00 05 | 052 | 70,9 |
| 999 | 70,9 |
| 0709 90 70 | 052 | 78,8 |
| 528 | 57,8 |
| 999 | 68,3 |
| 0805 50 10 | 388 | 66,9 |
| 524 | 58,9 |
| 528 | 60,4 |
| 999 | 62,1 |
| 0806 10 10 | 052 | 87,8 |
| 220 | 65,2 |
| 400 | 135,2 |
| 624 | 171,2 |
| 999 | 114,9 |
| 0808 10 80 | 388 | 64,5 |
| 400 | 73,1 |
| 508 | 55,7 |
| 512 | 67,3 |
| 528 | 78,5 |
| 720 | 44,6 |
| 804 | 78,3 |
| 999 | 66,0 |
| 0808 20 50 | 052 | 101,9 |
| 388 | 76,0 |
| 512 | 9,9 |
| 528 | 38,7 |
| 999 | 56,6 |
| 0809 30 10 , 0809 30 90 | 052 | 75,6 |
| 999 | 75,6 |
| 0809 40 05 | 052 | 78,9 |
| 508 | 43,6 |
| 624 | 64,6 |
| 999 | 62,4 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

052

66,7

999

66,7

0707 00 05

052

70,9

999

70,9

0709 90 70

052

78,8

528

57,8

999

68,3

0805 50 10

388

66,9

524

58,9

528

60,4

999

62,1

0806 10 10

052

87,8

220

65,2

400

135,2

624

171,2

999

114,9

0808 10 80

388

64,5

400

73,1

508

55,7

512

67,3

528

78,5

720

44,6

804

78,3

999

66,0

0808 20 50

052

101,9

388

76,0

512

9,9

528

38,7

999

56,6

0809 30 10 , 0809 30 90

052

75,6

999

75,6

0809 40 05

052

78,9

508

43,6

624

64,6

999

62,4

---

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code “
  999
  ” stands for “of other origin”.’

1

---
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**Officer Certifications Pursuant to Section 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Pampa Energía S.A., a *sociedad anónima* organized under the laws of Argentina (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge that:

 

The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: April 27, 2012

 

 

Date: April 27, 2012

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

  

 

 

 

----
EXHIBIT I 

SAMPLE COMPENSATION STRUCTURE 

CONSISTENT WITH THE PUBLIC INTERST STANDARD 

Example: Covered Employee with a total compensation package of $3,000,000. 

• Base salary. 

 Cash: The Covered Employee receives a total of $500,000 in cash salary. 

 Stock Salary: The Covered Employee receives $200,000 in stock salary, 

which vests immediately but may not be transferred prior to the first 

anniversary of the date it is earned. 

• Incentive Compensation. The Covered Employee may also receive $2,300,000 in 

incentive compensation as follows: 

 Cash Incentive: $700,000. 

• $350,000 immediately payable; and 

• $350,000 paid at least one year from the grant date. 

 Stock incentive: $1,600,000. 

• The entire amount may not be sold or transferred prior to the third 

anniversary of the grant date. 

• Total compensation. Covered Employee’s total compensation is $3,000,000, with 40% 

of the total delivered in cash and 60% delivered in stock (47% delivered short term and 

53% delivered long term). 

7%

23% 17%

53%

Cash Salary

Stock Salary - 1 year after grant

Stock Incentive - Not payable until the 3rd

year

Cash Incentive - 50% immediately, 50%

one year later

19%

53%

28%

Amounts payable in the current year

Amounts payable in the 2nd year

Amounts payable in 3+ years

Note 1: This Exhibit does not include amounts payable pursuant to legally binding rights under valid employment 

contracts, see 31 C.F.R. § 30.10(e)(2).

Breakdown of Total Direct Compensation Short Term vs. Long Term
Exhibit 15.3 

Ernst & Young LLC 

Sadovnicheskaya Nab., 77, bld. 1 

Moscow, 115035, Russia 

Tel: +7 (495) 705 9700 

+7 (495) 755 9700 

Fax: +7 (495) 755 9701 

www.ey.com 

June 30, 2011 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

100 F Street, N.E. 

Washington, DC 20549 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have read Item 16F of VimpelCom Ltd.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010and are in agreement with the statements contained in the2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 7th paragraphs therein. We have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein.

Regarding the registrant’s statement concerning the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting,included in the 3rd and 4th paragraphs therein, we had considered such matter in determining thenature, timing and extent of procedures performed in our audit of the registrant’s 2008 financial statements. 

/s/ Ernst & YoungLLC