alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT NUMBER 12(1)
 CERTIFICATIONS
 Allan Yap
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of China Enterprises Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Annual Report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Allan YapDR. ALLAN YAPChief Executive Officer
256 La. 1153

#### LAKESIDE RAMBLER SALES, INC. v. DURAD CORPORATION, Sherman Conrad, Roger Miles and Irene Conrad, Individually.

No. 50982.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 25, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Not considered. The application was not timely filed. See: La. Constitution, Article VII, Section 11.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                           1,000

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                                 2,420
<SECURITIES>                                                          57,629
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          6,197
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             415
<INVENTORY>                                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      71,294
<PP&E>                                                                 9,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        (4,157)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        95,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  8,790
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                                   1
<OTHER-SE>                                                            83,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          95,986
<SALES>                                                                5,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       5,860
<CGS>                                                                  1,926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          1,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      16,253
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       875
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      (11,444)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (11,444)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             (0.5)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           (0.5)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors of
Computer Motion, Inc.:


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated February 2, 1999 included in the Company's 1998 Annual Report to
Shareholders incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K into the Company's
previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-35939. It should be
noted that we have not audited any financial statements of the Company
subsequent to December 31, 1998 or performed any audit procedures subsequent
to the date of our report.



/s/ Arthur Andersen, LLP


Woodland Hills, California
March 26, 1999
#### Richard MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-947.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 13, 1969.

Richard Moore, in pro. per.

«dEarl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY, and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed a memorandum brief in support of his position, and on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Where.upon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed upon the authority of Williams v. State, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 29; Belton v. State, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 97; State v. Youngblood, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 98; State v. Williams, Fla.1969, 219 So.2d 684.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.23

                               FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
                            TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY
                      VOLUNTARY DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

         Tecumseh Products Company (the "Company") amends the Company's
Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan") as follows:


1.       Effective April 9, 2002, Section 6.3 of the Plan is amended to read:

                           6.3 Corporate Bond Investment Option. Participant
                  elections for this Option shall be reflected in a bookkeeping
                  sub-account, the value of which shall be based upon quarterly
                  crediting of earnings based on the current yield of the Dow
                  Jones Corporate Bond Index (DJCI). Amounts deferred will be
                  credited to such sub-account on the date such amount would
                  otherwise have been paid to the Participant. All amounts
                  reflected in this sub-account shall be credited with earnings,
                  compounded quarterly, from the date credited, based on a rate
                  of return equal to the current yield of the DJCI as of the
                  last business day of the preceding quarter.


2.       Except as amended above, the Plan continues in full force and effect.


WITNESS execution of this amendment on behalf of the Company.


                                    TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY



                                    By /s/ DAVID W. KAY
                                      --------------------------------------
                                         David W.Kay
                                         Its Vice President, Treasurer and
                                         Chief  Financial Officer


                                    Dated: September 25, 2002
Project Name Program 

Year

State County Cong. 

District

Primary 

Fund 

Source

Project Description Category FLMA 

Region

FLMA Unit Phase Delivered by Total 

Program 

Amount 

(range)

WY FLAP TRAIL10022(1) 

TETON PASS CENTENNIAL 

TRAIL

FY19 WY Teton WY atlarge FLAP

Construction of 0.36 mile of 10 ft wide 

multi-use pathway including a pathway 

underpass and small parking area at Trail 

Creek. 

3R FS-R4 CaribouTarghee NF Not Started WFLHD

Between 

$1,000,000 

and 

$5,000,000

WY FLAP 6WX(1) 

SOUTHFORK ROAD FY19 WY Park WY atlarge FLAP

The scope of this project will include 

roadway rehabilitation and widening, 

bridge replacement

and replacement and drainage repairs.

3R4R FS-R6 Shoshone NF Not Started CFLHD

Between 

$5,000,001 

and 

$10,000,000

WY FLAP 30400(1) GROS 

VENTRE ROAD FY20 WY Teton WY atlarge FLAP

Rehabilitation and paving of the Gros 

Ventre Road for 3.75 miles to the Atherton 

Creek Campground. Work will also 

include drainage and safety improvements 

as required.

3R FS-R4 Bridger-Teton 

NF Not Started CFLHD

Between 

$1,000,000 

and 

$5,000,000

WY FLAP 407(1) KORTES 

ROAD FY22 WY Natrona WY atlarge FLAP

Rehabilitation, widening and paving of 

Kortes Road for 7 miles. The project will 

also include safety and drainage 

improvements.

3R USBR

Alcova and 

Pathfinder 

Reservoirs

Not Started CFLHD

More than 

$10,000,000

WY FLAP 740(1) SKYLINE 

DRIVE AND FREMONT LAKE 

RD

FY23 WY Sublette WY atlarge FLAP

Rehabilitation, widening and paving of 

Skyline Drive

for 4.2 miles to the parking area, including 

drainage and safety improvements as 

required. Also includes the rehabilitation 

of Fremont Lake Road for 1.5 miles west 

to the parking including drainage 

improvements as needed as well as a 

seperated shared use path.

3R4R FS-R4 Bridger-Teton 

NF Not Started CFLHD

Between 

$5,000,001 

and 

$10,000,000

WYOMING

WYOMING FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM - CYCLE 3 - FINAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
No. 9686.

#### McManus et al. *v.*Wyssbrod et al.

(Decided October 9, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hancock County.

*Messrs. Phelps & David,*and *Messrs. Blackford & Blackford,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Poe & Poe,*for defendants in error.

Judgment' affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
Amendment No.1 to Schedule A to Exhibit (10)(j)



Exhibit (10)(j)(i) 
Amendment No. 1 
to 
Schedule A to Exhibit (10)(j) 
March 1, 2002 
 
The following table sets forth the name of each current director of
Potlatch Corporation who has executed the Indemnification Agreement filed as Exhibit (10)(j): 
 

	 Name of Director
	 	 Date Agreement Executed

	
	 Boh A. Dickey
	 	 August 7, 2000

	 Jerome C. Knoll
	 	 December 31, 2001

	 Lawrence S. Peiros
	 	 February 1, 2003

	 Gregory L. Quesnel
	 	 September 15, 2000

	 Michael T. Riordan
	 	 January 1, 2003

	 Toni Rembe
	 	 December 11, 1986

	 Judith M. Runstad
	 	 March 9, 1999

	 L. Pendleton Siegel
	 	 November 1, 1997

	 Frederick T. Weyerhaeuser
	 	 December 11, 1986

	 Dr. William T. Weyerhaeuser
	 	 February 22, 1990
5G3 Adjusted Heating Test Test Emissions

Burn Rate Emissions Emissions Efficiency Length Length Heat Heat Total Grams g/MJ Output g/kg g/h lb/MM CO

Purpose Fuel kg/hr g/hr g/hr % Overall HHV (Minutes) (Hours) Input Output of Particulate Dry Fuel (5G3) Btu Output g

Certification Doug Fir Crib 0.79 0.34 0.7 83.0 613 10.2 15,720 13,017 3.41 0.03 0.42 0.33 0.06 234

Certification Doug Fir Crib 0.94 0.39 0.8 84.5 550 9.2 18,610 15,729 3.54 0.02 0.41 0.39 0.06 128

Certification Doug Fir Crib 1.26 0.68 1.2 82.0 398 6.6 25,038 20,521 4.48 0.03 0.53 0.68 0.08 174

Certification Doug Fir Crib 1.70 0.52 1.1 80.3 288 4.8 34,360 27,578 2.48 0.02 0.30 0.52 0.04 49

Certification Doug Fir Crib 1.85 0.73 1.4 80.1 268 4.5 36,678 29,599 3.26 0.02 0.39 0.73 0.06 94

Certification Doug Fir Crib 2.15 0.38 0.8 78.6 229 3.8 42,383 33,224 1.44 0.01 0.18 0.38 0.03 10

Certification Doug Fir Crib 4.02 1.32 2.4 75.7 130 2.2 79,930 60,530 2.85 0.02 0.33 1.32 0.05 31

R&D Cordwood 0.89 0.88 n/a 82.3 924 15.4 16,806 13,826 13.50 0.06 0.98 0.88 0.14 162

R&D Cordwood 1.14 0.68 n/a 80.9 797 13.3 21,465 17,362 9.00 0.04 0.60 0.68 0.09 158

R&D Cordwood 2.56 0.50 n/a 74.2 201 3.4 47,710 35,386 1.67 0.01 0.20 0.50 0.03 22

R&D Doug Fir Crib 1.52 0.40 82.2 319 5.3 30,153 24,774 2.12 0.02 0.26 0.40 0.04 48

R&D Doug Fir Crib 3.93 0.55 1.1 80.9 124 2.1 73,032 59,051 1.13 0.01 0.15 0.55 0.02 12

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000

Emissions in g/hr

BTU Output

5G3 Emissions in Gm/hr v BTU Output: IDEAL STEEL Hybrid

EPA Certification Tests

ANSI Poposed

Cordwood

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000

Overall Heating Efficiency

BTU Output

Overall Heating Efficiency v BTU Output: IDEAL STEEL Hybrid

EPA Certification Tests

ANSI Proposed

Cordwood
Medium Burn - Proposed (9/24/13) ASTM Standard High Burn - Proposed (9/24/13) ASTM Standard

Test Results in Accordance with CSA B415.1-10 Test Results in Accordance with CSA B415.1-10

Test Duration:797 min 13.28 hrs Test Duration:201 min 3.35 hrs

HHV Basis LHV Basis HHV Basis LHV Basis

Overall Efficiency 80.9% 87.1% Overall Efficiency 74.2% 79.9%

Combustion Efficiency99.5% 99.5% Combustion Efficiency99.5% 99.5%

Heat Transfer Efficiency 81.3% 87.6% Heat Transfer Efficiency 74.5% 80.3%

Output Rate (kJ/h) 18,303 17,362 (Btu/h) Output Rate (kJ/h) 37,303 35,386

Burn Rate (kg/h) 1.14 2.51 (lb/h) Burn Rate (kg/h) 2.53 5.57

Input (kJ/h) 22,628 21,465 (Btu/h) Input (kJ/h) 50,294 47,710

Test Load Weight (dry kg) 15.11 33.31 dry lb Test Load Weight (dry kg) 8.47 18.67

MC wet (%) 17.34 MC wet (%) 15.82

MC dry (%) 20.98 MC dry (%) 18.79

Particulate (g ) 9 Particulate (g ) 1.67

CO (g) 158 CO (g) 22

Test Duration (h) 13.28 Test Duration (h) 3.35

Emissions Particulate CO Emissions Particulate CO

g/MJ Output 0.04 0.65 g/MJ Output 0.01 0.18

g/kg Dry Fuel 0.60 10.43 g/kg Dry Fuel 0.20 2.58

g/h 0.68 11.87 g/h 0.50 6.54

lb/MM Btu Output 0.09 1.51 lb/MM Btu Output 0.03 0.41
#### John Thomas BOWLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-460.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 11, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Walter KNIGHT, Jr., Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-855.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 25, 1973.

ORDERED the July 17, 1973 pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus of Walter Knight, Jr., is hereby denied upon the ground that the said Walter Knight, Jr., has a full appeal in Case No. 73-586 pending in this court from the same April 2, 1973 conviction in the Brevard County, Florida, Circuit Court referred to in this pro se petition.

Habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly report of Bio Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  January
30, 2009


By:
            /s/
      David KoosDavid
      KoosChief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bio
Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. and will be retained by Bio Matrix Scientific
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Earl MALVEAUX.

No. 60777.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 11, 1977.

In re: Earl Malveaux applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition or mandamus.

Writ granted. Bond reduced to $7500.

*679SANDERS, C. J.,

dissents from the reduction of the bond.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents from the reduction of the bond. There was no abuse of discretion in the ruling of the trial judge.
EA-YJLTQRNEY GENERAL 

o~-T~xkis 

May 13, 1953 

State Board of Control Opinion No. S-39 

Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas Re,: Authority of the State 

Board of Control to let 

supply purchase contracts 

Dear Sirs: on a two year basis., 

You have requested an opinion on the authority of the Board of Control to make a two year supply 

contract for state departments and agencies if in the 

opinion of the board it is advantageous to the State. 

Prior to the creation of the State Board of 

Control the State Purchasing ~Agent was authorized to 

contract for all supplies, merchandise and items needed 

for the maintenance and operation of eleemosynary and 

educational institutions. S,uch contracts were limited 

to a term of one year. Article 7328, Revised Civil 

Statutes, 1911, as amended by Chapter 126, Acts 34th 

Legislature, Regular Session, 1915, page 193. 

It was the duty of the Superintendent of Public 

Buildings and Grounds to furnish State departments and 

agencies with furniture, fixtures and supplies. Chapter 

42, Acts 35th Legislature, 4th Called Session, 1918, 

Page 72. Contracts for supplies of State departments 

and agencies were not limited. 

The duties of the State Purchasing Agent and 

the State Superintendent of Public Buildings and Grounds 

were transferred to the State Board of Control by the 

Legislature in 1919. Chapter 167, Acts 36th Legislature, 

Regular Session, 1919, page 323. The articles prescribing the duties of the State Purchasing Agent, State 

Superintendent of Public Buildings and Grounds and 

State Board of Control were codified in the Revised 

Civil Statutes, 1925, as articles 601-695. 

Since the Constitution and statutes of this 

State are silent as to the length of term for which a 

supply contract for State departments and agencies may 
State Board of Control, page 2 (S-39) 

be made, the only provision affecting the term ~of such 

contracts are those constitutional provisions which provide that no debt may be created by or on behalf of the 

State and that an appropriation of money cannot be made 

for a longer term than two years. Charles Scribner's 

Sons v. Marrs, 114 Tex. 11, 262 S. 

v. City 'of Waco, 89 Tex. 83, 33 S. 

Gen. Op. S-18 '(1953). It is therefore our o,pinion that 

the Board of Control may legally award supply contracts 

for State departments and agencies for a term of two 

years provided supplies for eleemosynary and educational 

institutions are not included in the contracts. Contracts for the supplies of such institutions are limited 

to a term of one year. Arts. 642-645, V.C.S. 

SUMMARY 

The State aboard of Control may legally 

award supply contracts for State departments 

and agencies for a term of two years provided that supplies for eleemosynary and 

educational institutions. are snot included 

in the contracts. 

Yours very,truly, 

APPROVED: JOHN BEN SREPPERD 

Attorney General 

J. C. Davis, Jr. 

County Affairs Division 

C. K. Richards 

Reviewer 

Robert S. Trotti 

First Assistant 

Assistant 

John Ben Shepperd 

Attorney General 

JR:am
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28310]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 925]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 17 Kansas City, Kansas, Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, an application from the Greater Kansas City Foreign Trade 
Zone, Inc., grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 17, Kansas City, Kansas, 
area, for authority to expand FTZ 17 to include two sites in Topeka, 
Kansas, was filed by the Board on July 24, 1996 (FTZ Docket 61-96, 61 
FR 40396, 8/2/96);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in Federal 
Register and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 17 is approved, subject to the Act 
and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and subject to 
the standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall zone project.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of October 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28310 Filed 10-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P