T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E Z E QU I E L MI R AMON T E S - AR T E AG A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73473 A ge nc yN o. A 035- 789- 677 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . E z e qui e l M i r a m ont e s - A rt e a ga , anat i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e ope n and di s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on



# FI LED JU N 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 73473 2 gr ant i ng the gove rnm e nt ’ s m ot i on t o r e s c i nd. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pur s uantt o 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for abu se of di sc re t i on the deni alof a m ot i on t o reopen an dd e n o v o c o n s titu tio n a l an dle g a l is s u e s . A v ila - Sa n c h ezv . Mu ka s e y, 509 F . 3d 1 0 3 7 , 1 0 3 9 - 4 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e a g e n c yc o rr e c tlyd e te rm in e dth a t th e I Jla c k e dju r is d ic tio n to e n te rta in M ir a m o n te s - A rte a g a ’s s e c o n dm o tio n to r e o p e n b e c au s e ju r is d ic tio n r e m a in e dw ith th e B I A f

o llo w in g th e B I A ’s o r d e rd is m is s in g M ir am o n te s - A rte a g a ’s p r io rap p e a l. See 8 C .F .R . § § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( a ) , 1 0 0 3 .2 3 ( b ) ( 1 ) . B e c aus e M i r a m ont e s - A rt e a ga ’ s 1998 de port a t i on or de rw a s l aw f ul w he n he w a s d e p o rte d , th e B I A d idn o t e rrin c o n c lu d in g th a t M ir am o n te s - A rte a g af a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te a“g r o s s m is c arr ia g e o f ju s tic e a t th e p r io rp r o c e e d in g .” Ra m i rez -J

u a r ezv . I NS , 6 3 3 F .2 d1 7 4 , 1 7 5 - 7 6 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 0 ) ( p e rc u r iam ) ; see a l so A la v a r e n g a - V

illa lo b o s v . A s h c r o

ft , 2 7 1 F .3 d1 1 6 9 , 1 1 7 2 - 7 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) ; A v i laSa nchez , 5 0 9 F .3 da t 1 0 4 0 - 4 1 . A c c o r d in g ly , th e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g M iar a m o n te s - A rte a g a ’s m o tio n to r e o p e n . Se e Ah wa z iv . I NS , 751 F . 2d 11 20 , 11 22 (9th C i r. 19 85 ) ( w e w i l l up ho l d the B IA ’ s deni alof a m ot i on t o reopen

“ un l es s i ti s arbi trary , i rr at i on al , or contraryt o l aw ”) . M ir a m o n te s - A rte a g a ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s ar e u np e r s u a s iv e . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.