alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## i^mm^i j O F 

# ® IVIemorandu m U.S.Departmento f • ' ^ I- ' L = 2 2 Transportatio n Office of th e Secretar

y o f Transportatio n Subject : Payou t proccdurc s a s aresul t

o f th e temporary closur e o f Date

: Novembe r

14 , 201 1 Canyonland s Fiel d(Moab , Utah ) (Docke t DOT-OST-1997-2827 ) y l A )/

0 J / OAAMemoNo
. A^/^vt:^i/./U^^<^i^T__

_2011-6 5 From : Dcnnl s J
. DcVany , Chie f <i 7 Repl y t o Bria n Swanson , X-5 3 EA S & Domesti c Analysis , X-5 3 A" " °f ^ Ext
. 6539

2 To : Gregory Frazier , Resourc e Directorate , S-3. 6 Canyonland s Fiel d(CNY) Canyonland s Fiel d(Moab , Utah ) provide dnotic e t o Great Lake s that

it woul dclos e for pavemen t resurfacin g an dpaintin g fro mOctobe r 3 , 2011 , throug h Octobe r 7 , 2011 , returnin g t o norma l operatio n o n Octobe r 8 , 2011
. Great

Lake s currentl y provide s subsidize dEA S at Moab for arat e o f $1,470.4 6 pe r

arrival/departure
. It ha s bee n ou r

policy , o n acase-by-cas e basis , t o pay EA S carrier s thei r usua l subsid y rat e whe n airport s hav e bee n close do n th e ground s tha t th e circumstance s ar e beyon dth e carriers ' contro l an dther e ar e onl y minima l cos t saving s t o th e carrier s whil e the y los e al l o f th e revenue . Th e carrier s woul donl y sav e o n fuel an daportio n o f maintenanc e becaus e the y woul dnot b e abl e t o turn bac k

aircraf t o r lay-of f personnel
. Consisten t

wit h thi s precedent , w e as k yo u t o compensat e Great Lake s for

flight s i t di dno t operat e durin g th e closur e period s note dabove
. Attachmen t

cc : Mr
. Chuc k

Howell , Great

Lake s Mr
. Kell y Braun , Canyonland s Fiel d

### Swanson , Bria n (OST) From : Chuc k Howel l [chowell@flygreatlakes.com ] Sent : Thursday , Novembe r10 , 201 1 3:5 0 P M To : Swanson , Bria n (OST ) Cc : 'Justi n Irish' ; 'Naom i Craig ' Subject : FW : Airport Closure-CN Y
Brian , Thes e date s concu rwit h ou rbilling s t o DOT

. Le t m e kno w i f yo u nee d anythin g else

. Regards , Chuc k
From : Kell yL Brau n [mailto:kbraun@arand.utah.qov 1 Sent : Thursday , Novembe r10 , 201 1 1:1 7 PM To : 'Chuc k

Howell ' Cc : brian.swanson@)dot.qo v Subject : Airpor t Closur e Chuck , Jus t wante d t o follo w u p o n ou rphon e conversatio n earlie rtoday

. Th e airpor t wa s officiall y close d Octobe r3' " @ 0:0 0 hr s MST t o Octobe r?" ' @ 23:5 9 hr s MST fo rpavemen t resurfacin g an d painting

. Du e t o th e closur e Grea t Lake s wa s no t able t o operat e schedule d flights

. Norma l operation s resume d o n Saturday , Octobe r8*^, 2011

. I kno w tha t airpor t closure s pu t a bi g wrinkl e i n you roperation s an d I wil l continu e t o provid e yo u wit h as muc h notic e as possibl e t o mitigat e futur e closures

. I f yo u hav e an yothe rquestion s pleas e contac t me . Respectfully , KELL Y BRAU N Gran dCounty Airport

Manage r 12 5 E
. Cente r

St
. Moab U T 8453 2 (435 ) 259-484 9 offic e (435 ) 259-486 0 fa

x (720 ) 297-089 6 ce

U
**Exhibit 23****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-106307, 333-109433, 33-64968,and 333-15241) of OXiGENE, Inc. and the related Prospectuses,Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-05787, 333-92747and 333-32958) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, andRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-84870,333-84872, 333-85860 and 333-117083) pertaining to theCompensation Award Stock Agreements and the Restricted StockAgreements between OXiGENE, Inc. and Certain Directors,Employees and Non-employees, of our reports dated March 9,2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofOXiGENE, Inc., OXiGENE, Inc. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingof OXiGENE, Inc., included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.     /s/ Ernst & Young LLPBoston, MassachusettsMarch 9, 2005
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: National    compensation survey. State and local government. Quincy, IL-MO.
 
SuDocs Number:L 2.121/13:Q 4/
Item    Number:0768-B-13    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000869745
 
 
 
2008
 
2009
 
2010
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  June, 8, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
99–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 111–674 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE 

COMMITTEE ON RULES, AND PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES 

DECEMBER 7, 2010.—Referred to the House Calender and ordered to be printed 

Mr. POLIS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1752] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1752, by a record vote of 6 to 3, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The resolution applies the waiver to any resolution reported through the legislative day of December 18, 2010. Finally, the resolution authorizes the Speaker to entertain motions 

that the House suspend the rules at any time through the legislative day of December 18, 2010. The Speaker or her designee shall 

consult with the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this resolution. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 507 

Date: December 7, 2010. 

Measure: H. Res. 1752—Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of 

rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

Motion by: Mr. McGovern. 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with REPORTS
2 

Results: Adopted 6–3. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Yea; Hastings (FL)—Yea; Matsui—Yea; Pingree—Yea; Polis—Yea; Dreier—Nay; Diaz-Balart, 

L.—Nay; Foxx—Nay; Slaughter—Yea. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with REPORTS
SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES:

                                 -----------------

                          DWS Lifecycle Long Range Fund


The following information supplements the disclosure in "The Fund's Main
Investment Strategy" section in the fund's prospectuses:

The fund may also invest in Exchange Traded Funds ("ETFs").

The following information supplements the disclosure in "The Main Risks of
Investing in the Fund" section of the fund's prospectuses:

ETF Risk. An ETF is a fund that holds a portfolio of common stocks or bonds
designed to track the performance of a securities index or industry sector.
ETFs trade on a securities exchange and their shares may, at times, trade at a
premium or discount to their net asset value ("NAV"). In addition, an ETF may
not replicate exactly the performance of the index it seeks to track for a
number of reasons, including transaction costs incurred by the ETF. ETFs incur
fees and expenses, such as operating expenses, licensing fees, trustee fees and
marketing expenses, which are borne proportionately by ETF shareholders, such
as the fund. The fund will also incur brokerage costs when purchasing and
selling shares of ETFs.

The following information supplements the disclosure in the "Who Manages and
Oversees the Fund" section of the fund's prospectuses:

Effective immediately, Thomas J. Flaherty will no longer serve as Senior
Portfolio Manager on behalf of the Fund. All references to Mr. Flaherty are
hereby deleted.




               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference


                                                          [DWS INVESTMENTS LOGO]
                                                             Deutsche Bank Group

January 14, 2009
DLLRF-3602
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3523 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3523

         To end unemployment payments to jobless millionaires.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2023

   Ms. Ernst (for herself, Mr. Tester, and Mr. Braun) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To end unemployment payments to jobless millionaires.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Unemployment Payments to 
Jobless Millionaires Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. ENDING UNEMPLOYMENT PAYMENTS TO JOBLESS MILLIONAIRES.

    (a) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
Federal funds may be used to make payments of unemployment compensation 
(including such compensation under the Federal-State Extended 
Compensation Act of 1970) in a year to an individual whose adjusted 
gross income is equal to or greater than $1,000,000.
    (b) Compliance.--Any application for unemployment compensation 
shall include a form or procedure for an individual applicant to 
certify that such individual is not prohibited from receiving 
unemployment compensation pursuant to subsection (a).
    (c) Audits.--The certifications required by subsection (b) shall be 
auditable by the Department of Labor or the Government Accountability 
Office.
    (d) Effective Date.--The prohibition under subsection (a) shall 
apply to weeks of unemployment beginning on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Warren F. JOHNSTON, Appellant, v. Dorothy M. JOHNSTON, Appellee.

No. 75-1971.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 12, 1977.

Robert G. Petree, Bornstein, Petree & Shader, Orlando, for appellant.

John M. Cain, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The evidence presented to the trial court having been reviewed in light of the guidelines established by *Brown v. Brown,*300 So.2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), *Gordon v. Gordon,*335 So.2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) and *McAllister v. McAllister,*345 So.2d 352*683(Fla. 4th DCA 1977), and we having concluded that the awards made to the appel-lee-wife may exceed those that we would have found appropriate had we presided at the trial, but that they do not represent an abuse of judicial discretion or appear patently erroneous, we do affirm.

AFFIRMED.

MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., and STEWART, JAMES R., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53322-53323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27118]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4186-000]


Agway Energy Services, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

October 8, 1997.
    Agway Energy Services, Inc. (Agway) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Agway will engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy

[[Page 53323]]

transactions as a marketer. Agway also requested waiver of various 
Commission regulations. In particular, Agway requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Agway.
    On September 26, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the 
Director, Division of Rate Applications, Office of Electric Power 
Regulation, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, 
subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Agway should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Agway is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Agway's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is October 27, 1997. Copies 
of the full text of the order are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27118 Filed 10-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### JOHN EHRHARDT, Respondent, *v.*A. CURRY, Appellant.

Clerical Error in Judgment must be Presented Below. Where on appeal it appeared that there was a clerical error or mistake to the extent of five dollars in a judgment, and the attention of the court below had not been called, to it: Held, that the point could not be made in the appellate court.

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Ormsby County.

This was an action on two checks, one for $785.90 and the other for $102.00, 'dated Carson City, May 15th, 1871, and drawn on Wells, Fargo & Co. by defendant in favor of plaintiff. Wells, Fargo & Co. refused to pay for want of funds of defendant. The defense was want of consideration. There was a judgment for plaintiff for the amount of the checks and interest; but it seems that the judgment ivas entered for $5 too much. The specifications of error in the statement on motion for' new trial were to the effect that the evidence was insufficient to show that defendant was liable on'the cheeks, and that it appeared that the checks were given for work done by plaintiff in the erection of the United States branch mint at Carson City, and that such work was done for the United States Government and not for defendant.

In the judgment, the court recited that it found that defendant made and delivered the checks, as set out in the complaint; that they were given for a good and valuable consideration; that plaintiff was the owner and holder thereof; that there was due and payable to him from defendant thereon the amount of said checks and inter*222est; and then followed the judgment that plaintiff recover of defendant the sum of $872.51 and costs.

*T. D. Edwards*and *Thomas Wells,*for Appellant.

I. The findings of fact do not justify any conclusions of law favorable to the plaintiff, nor do they show that plaintiff was legally entitled to any judgment against defendant. The court did not find that the facts ever transpired, contingent upon which plaintiff had a right to sue upon the. checks or either of them.

II. The court found no conclusion of law; hence the judgment is unauthorized and voidable.

III. The judgment shows upon its face that it is in excess of the amount then due from defendant to plaintiff on the checks sued upon, if anything was due. The checks and intex’est amounted to $867.47, and not $872.61 for which judgment was entered. 14 Cal. 240 ; 3 Cal. 396.

*Robert M. Clarke,*for Respondent.

By the Court,

Garber, J.:

In this ease the only assignment which is even plausible,' is that the judgment is for five dollars more than the sum px-ayed for and shown to be due by the findings and complaint. This was clearly a clerical erx’or, or the result of a mistake in computing the iixterest. The attention of the court below should have been called to the mistake, and a motion there made to correct it. Under the circumstances, the point cannot be made in this court. 5 Cal. 417; 20 N. Y. 498.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
#### Lawrence M. SHUPNICK, Appellant, v. Lynn H. SHUPNICK, Appellee.

No. 70-862.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 26, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 2010 - Present PA Police Officer's Crash Report Manual 

2010

2 – Major Injury A Major Injury: Incapacitating injury, including bleeding wounds and distorted members 

(amputations or broken bones), and requires transport of the patient from the scene.) Injury Severity (Box C) codes & definitions found on 

Manual pg43-44.

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE STATE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 2010 - Present

PA Police Officer's Crash Report Manual 

2010

Common Wealth of PA Police Crash 

Reporting Form 2002

Pedestrian 31 A natural person afoot. 10 - Unit Type (Type Unit in manual) code & definition found on Manual 

pg36.

Pedestrian on skates, in 

wheelchair, etc. 32 People in wheelchairs, motorized or not; skateboards; skates; non-motorized scooters. NOT 

bicycles (see Non-Motorized Vehicle) 10 - Unit Type (Type Unit in manual) code & definition found on Manual 

pg36.

Pedalcyclist 2010 - Present

Non-Motorized Vehicle 11 Bicycle, horse and rider, horse and buggy, etc. 10 - Unit Type (Type Unit in manual) code & definition found on Manual 

pg36. 

Unicycle, Bicycle, Tricycle 20 No definition found. Vehicle Type

Other Pedalcycle 21 No definition found. Vehicle Type

Pennsylvania
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
HARRY LEE GOOD ,

Petitioner ,

v. Case No. 5D 18

- 935
S TATE OF FLORIDA ,

Respondent

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed April 13, 2018 Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Michael A. Graves, Public Defender Ocala, and Jessica L. Roberts, Assistant Public Defender, O cala, for Petitioner. No appearance , for Respondent.
PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the January 24, 2018

order den ying Petitioner’s pro se motion for post

- conviction relief , filed in C ase N o

. 05

- CF

- 389

- A

- Z, in the Judicial Circuit Court in and for Marion County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).

PETITION GRANTED

.

SAWAYA, BERGER and WALLIS , JJ., con cur.
#### Sandy C. KIRKCONNELL, Appellant, v. Hilda M. KIRKCONNELL, Appellee.

No. 68-644.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 7, 1969.

*442David F. Patterson, of Bryson & Patterson, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

John R. Foltz, of Harrison, Greene, Mann, Davenport, Rowe & Stanton, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

MANN, Judge.

In 1962 Sandy Kirkconnell, a merchant mariner, met and married Hilda in New Zealand, to which she has now returned with their two-year-old daughter. She agreed to waive alimony and support and he agreed that she might return to her native land. Notwithstanding the agreement, the special master recommended $20 per week support and the trial judge allowed $15. Kirkconnell appeals.

Sedell v. Sedell, Fla.App.1958, 100 So.2d 639, is not in point. In that case the husband and wife agreed upon sums for support and modification without cause was disapproved. But in this case the wife agreed to waive alimony, which she may do, and support for the child, which she may not unless the court, concerned primarily with the child’s welfare, approves.

The appellant also contends that there is no evidence of the child’s needs. There is evidence that the father earned more than $10,000 in 1967 and allowed his wife $300 per month for household expenses. We hold this a sufficient basis for awarding $15.00 per week for support. The master had recommended a higher amount and the father offered no testimony of excessiveness. Cf. Walborsky v. Walborsky, Fla.App.1967, 197 So.2d 853.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. I., and PIERCE, J., concur.