alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60487-60488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29521]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Notice of Availability of Record of Decision (ROD) for the 
Colorado Airspace Initiative (CAI)

    On October, 28, 1997, the Air Force signed the ROD for the Colorado 
Airspace Initiative (CAI). The decision included in the ROD were made 
in consideration of, but not limited to, the information contained in 
the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) filed with the 
Environmental Protection Agency on August 22, 1997.
    The decision rendered by the US Air Force is that the US Air Force 
will proceed with modifying existing and creating new military training 
airspace. The actions will take place primarily in Colorado, and will 
be used primarily by the Colorado Air National Guard, although other 
military service flying units will also use the airspace. The CAI 
serves to support the National Guard Bureau's request for modification 
to the National Airspace System administered by the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA). Another purpose is to respond to changes in 
commercial aircraft arrival and departure corridors dictated by the FAA 
for the operation of the new Denver International Airport.
    The implementation of the CAI will proceed with minimal adverse 
impact to

[[Page 60488]]

the environment. This action conforms with applicable Federal, State 
and local statutes and regulation, and all reasonable and practicable 
efforts have been or will be made to minimize any related impact to the 
local public and the environment.
    Any questions regarding this matter should be directed to Mr. Harry 
Knudsen, (301) 836-8143. Correspondence should be sent to: ANG/CEVP, 
3500 Fetchet Avenue, Andrews Air Force Base, MD 20762-5157.
Barbara A. Carmichael,
Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-29521 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric E. Parsons, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 5, 2009



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    ERIC E. PARSONS                              
|Eric E. Parsons Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2005221EN.01001601.xml

| 26.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 221/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 221/16

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1390/2005

of 25 August 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 3rd partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 3rd partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 40,310 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 August 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 August 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

2

---
#### Bobby BOLIN et ux. v. NATIONAL TEA COMPANY.

No. 62672.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Bobby J. Bolin and Ethel Fannette Godwin Bolin, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 359 So.2d 690.

Writ denied.
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: References in the docket 

FROM: Scott Jenkins, Ambient Standards Group 

TO: NO2 NAAQS Review Docket 

EPA is hereby incorporating into the docket the following widely available publications: 

 

Atkinson, R., “Atmospheric Transformations of Automotive Emissions”. In Air Pollution, 

the Automobile, and Public Health, A. Y. Watson, R. R. Bates, and D. Kennedy, Ed. 

National Academies Press, ISBN: 0-309-56826-9, (1988). Available at: 

http://www.nap.edu/catalog/1033.html 

Finlayson-Pitts and Pitts (1999) Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere, 

Academic Press, 1999. 

National Research Council, (1991). Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and 

Regional Air Pollution. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 500pp. 

Watson A, Bates R, Kennedy D, ed. (1988). Air Pollution, the Automobile, and Public 

Health, The National Academies Press, 1988. 

Any person wishing to review these publications should contact Dr. Scott Jenkins, Health and 

Environmental Impacts Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, Mail code C504-06, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; 

telephone: 919-541-1167; fax: 919-541-0237; email: jenkins.scott@epa.gov.
Exhibit 23.2



March 23, 2012





Consent of Independent Engineers



We refer to our report entitled “Evaluation
of the P&NG Reserves of Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd. (As of December 31, 2011)”, dated February 28, 2012 (the “Report”).



We hereby consent to the use of our name and references
to excerpts from the Report in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2011.



| | Sincerely,                
| | --------------------------
| |                           
| | SPROULE ASSOCIATES LIMITED



| | By: | /s/ Cameron P. Six            | 
| | --- | ----------------------------- | 
| |     | Name:  Cameron P. Six, P. Eng
| |     | Title:  Manager, Engineering
Exhibit 13.1



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of
China Ceramics Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2012 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|               | CHINA CERAMICS CO., LTD. |                                              
|-------------- | ------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------
|               |                          |                                              
|April 24, 2013 | By:                      | /s/ Huang Jia Dong                           
|               |                          | Name: Huang Jia Dong                         
|               |                          | Title:   Chief Executive Officer             
|               |                          | (Principal Executive Officer)                
|               |                          |                                              
|April 24, 2013 | By:                      | /s/ Hen Man Edmund                           
|               |                          | Name: Hen Man Edmund                         
|               |                          | Title:   Chief Financial Officer             
|               |                          | (Principal Financial and Accounting  Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7827
ROBERT LEE BROCK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Indian Creek Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-1076-R) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 28, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brock v. Warden , No. CA-95-1076-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00164-CV

Wilks Ranch Texas Ltd.; Frac Tech Services, LLC; and the City of Cisco, Texas,

Appellants

v.

The Public Utility Commission of Texas; Barry T. Smitherman, Chairman;

Donna L. Nelson, Commissioner; Kenneth W. Anderson, Jr., Commissioner; and

Lone Star Transmission, LLC, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-11-000571, HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to abate the appeal. They state that the

underlying dispute may become moot within the next 60 to 90 days but the timing remains

unclear. Accordingly, we grant the motion and abate the appeal. All appellate deadlines will be

tolled during the period of abatement. Absent further order of this Court, this appeal will be

automatically reinstated on July 15, 2013. The parties are directed to file either a status report

or a motion to dismiss by that date.
__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field

Abated

Filed: April 18, 2013

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0 030 WILLIAM M. SOLEM and ELLEN G. SOLEM,

Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. STATE OF MONTANA, DEPARTMENT OFREVENUE,

Defendant and Appellant . Appellant is granted an extension of time until April 28, 2023 , to prepare, file, and serve its opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 21 2023

03/21/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0030
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

**Letter of Ernst & Young, dated July 9, 2010 with respect to item 16F**

9 July 2010 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

100 FStreet N.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20549 

We have read Item 16F of Form 20-F dated 9 July 2010, of China Metro-Rural Holdings Limited (formerly known as Man Sang International (B.V.I.)Limited) and are in agreement with the statements contained in the first, second and third paragraphs on page 112 therein. We have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein. 

/s/Ernst & Young
OFFICIAL. NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308,CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

### ©FFflCOAL BUSINESS STATE ©F TEXAS ' PENALTY FOR 

## 3/11/2015 PRIVATE USE PARRISH, RONALD BUCK o v Q ^IPfyy s.^ ||n ^ p|TNEyBOWES 02 1R ^

__ _ 0006557458 MAR 17 2015 

### Tr. Ct*No. "W03^!r89¥S:-V^ApFROMZlWR42;1?686-r04 

### On this day, the application for 11 07Writ of Habeas Corpus has been received and presented to the Court. Abel Acosta, Clerk ss



### RONALD BUCK PARR^H^ „ 

## DANIEL UNIT

-TDC#118T13DjJ.^^-_

u i ic.':'.!
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-66944, No. 33-67138, No. 33-74734, No.33-94878, No. 333-66837, No. 333-78499, No. 333-81159, No. 333-68168) of QRS Corporation of our report dated March 8, 2004 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

San Francisco, CA****

March 12, 2004
#### Shirley I. HORNSBY et al., Appellants, v. PALMER FIRST NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF SARASOTA et al., Appellees.

Nos. 69-712, 69-713.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# L_2005083EN.01001001.xml

| 1.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 83/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 83/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 500/2005

of 31 March 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 22nd partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 22nd partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 38,359 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Monte Zweben, the Chief Executive Officer of Blue Martini Software, Inc. (the Company), and Eran Pilovsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, to the which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 11, 2004



/s/    MONTE ZWEBENMonte ZwebenChief Executive Officer/s/    ERAN PILOVSKYEran PilovskyChief Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies the Periodic Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after that date of the Periodic Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Mario PIACQUADIO et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI, Florida, a municipal corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-832.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Q

US. Department 400 Seventh St., S.W.
of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590
Federal Highway February 11, 1999

Administration

Refer to: HHS-10
R-29c

Mr. James J. Kerstein

President, Polywood Plastic
and Lumber, Inc.

3615 Kennedy Road

South Planfield, NJ 07080

Dear Mr. Kerstein:

This is in response to your January 15, 1999, letter requesting acceptance of your recycled
plastic block by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for use with strong post
W-beam guardrail. Subsequent telephone conversations between you and Mr. Richard Powers
of my staff confirmed that the blocks you produce have essentially the same chemical
composition as those of your predecessor company, ARW-Polywood. These blocks were
accepted by FHWA on June 5, 1995. Consequently, your Polywood block may be considered
acceptable for use on strong post metal beam guardrail along the National Highway System
(NHS) when selected by a State highway agency. When used with steel posts, it must meet the
dimensions shown on the enclosed drawing. This acceptance is based on the expected crash
performance of your product only and is not intended to address the effects of weathering or
UV degradation. We assume that you will certify to using highway agencies that the blocks
you provide have essentially the same material composition as you indicated to us (80 percent
High Density Polyethylene and 20 percent Polystyrene) and that you will provide information
on their expected long-term durability as well.

Since your product is proprietary, its selection for use on the NHS must meet one of the
conditions specified in Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411, a copy of
which is enclosed.

Sincerely yours,

Doct | bine

Dwight A. Horne
Director, Office of Highway Safety Infrastructure

2 Enclosures
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
1350


(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer
of Smartag International, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best
of his knowledge and belief that:





(1) The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May
12, 2010





/ s/ Peng Keong Lim
              Peng
      Keong Lim
              CEO,
      President and Director
# October 2008 - September 2009