alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marimba, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard C. Wyckoff, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented in the Report.



|             |  |  |  |                                                         
|------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|May 14, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Richard C. Wyckoff                               
|             |  |  |  |                                                         
|             |  |  |  | Richard C. Wyckoff Chief Executive Officer and
President
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.27

                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                               AMENDMENT NUMBER 1

          AMENDMENT  NUMBER  1,  DATED  DECEMBER  22  , 2002, (the Amendment) to
EMPLOYMENT  AGREEMENT  (the "Agreement") dated December 3, 2002, between NOVADEL
PHARMA  INC, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), 31 State Route 12 West,
Flemington, New Jersey 08822 and GARY SHANGOLD, 14 Laurel Mountain Way, Califon,
New  Jersey  07830  (the  "Executive").

                              W I T N E S S E T H
                          ----------------------------

     WHEREAS,  the  parties entered into the Agreement on December 3, 2002; and,

     WHEREAS, there are certain anomalies in the Agreement, and the parties wish
to  revise  the  terms  and  conditions  of  the  Agreement, as provided herein;

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual covenants and undertakings
herein  contained,  the  parties  agree  as  follows:

     1.     This Amendment is made pursuant to paragraph 11(e) of the Agreement.
The  provisions  hereof  shall become effective as of the date of the Agreement.
All  terms  of  the  Agreement  not  explicitly amended herein shall continue in
effect  as  originally  written.

     2.     Paragraph  2.1 of  the  Agreement  is revised  to provide  that  the
Executive's  employment  shall  begin  on  December  23,  2002.

     3.     Paragraph  5(a)  of  the  Agreement  is  revised  to  provide  that
Executive's  Base  Salary  shall  be  payable  in  bi-weekly  installments.

     4.     Paragraph  5(f)  of  the  Agreement  is  revised to provide that the
options  referred  to  therein shall be Non-plan Options, with an exercise price
equal  to  one  hundred ten percent (110%) of the closing price of the Company's
stock on the NASDQ OTC Bulletin Board on December 3, 2002, and shall have a term
of  five  years  from  that  date.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  parties  have executed this Agreement as of the date
first  above  written.

ATTEST:                         NOVADEL  PHARMA  INC.

By:  /s/  Robert  F.  Schaul                     By:  /s/  John  H. Klein
     -----------------------                          --------------------------
     Robert  F.  Schaul,  Secretary                   John  H.  Klein,  Chairman

WITNESS:



     /s/  Robert  F.  Schaul                          /s/ Gary Shangold
    -----------------------------                     --------------------------
                                                          Gary  Shangold




<PAGE>
EX-32  Section 1350 Certifications




CORE HEALTH CARE NETWORK INC.




Pursuant to Section  18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant  to  section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002 (subsection  (a) and (b) of  section  1350,  chapter 63 of title 18, United  States  Code),  each of the  undersigned  officers  of Core Health Care Network, Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:





The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2010  (the  "Form  10-K")  of  the  Company   fully   complies   with  the requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and  information  contained  in the  Form  10-K  fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  April 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Lewis C. WarrenLewis C. WarrenPrincipal Executive Officer




By:
/s/Pamela McClanahan­Pamela McClanahanPrincipal Financial Officer
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    |  /s/ Robert A. Bosi      |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Robert      A. Bosi           |
|   | Vice      President and Chief |
|   | Financial      Officer        |
|   | March      13, 2009           |

| *  | A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has      been provided to TranSwitch Corporation and will be retained by TranSwitch      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its      staff upon request. |
|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
| (1)   | the              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Snap2 Corporation, for the quarter              ended December 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the              information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the              quarter ended December 30, 2004, fairly presents in all material respects,              the financial condition and results of operations of Snap2              Corporation. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                  Kevin D.                Johnson                                |   |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|  Name:     |  Kevin                D. Johnson                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director                                                                                                                                                             |
|  Date:     |  December                9, 2005                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
#### John Stanley REMP a/k/a Jack Roberts, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-277.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 5, 1971.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Vera Winter Lee, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Remp v. State, 248 So.2d 677 (Fla.App.1970).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55395-55396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Technical Information Service


NTIS Advisory Board Meeting

AGENCY: National Technical Information Service, Technology 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of partially closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 
2, notice is hereby given that the National Technical Information 
Service Advisory Board (the ``Board'') will meet on Tuesday, November 
25, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., and from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. 
The session from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., will be closed to the Public.
    The Board was established under the authority of 15 U.S.C. 
3704b(c), and was Chartered on September 15, 1989. The Board is 
composed of five members appointed by the Secretary of Commerce who are 
eminent in such fields as information resources management, information 
technology, and library and information services. The purpose of the 
meeting is to review and make recommendations regarding general 
policies and operations of NTIS, including policies in connection with 
fees and charges for its services. The agenda will include a progress 
report on NTIS activities, an update on the progress of FedWorld, and a 
discussion of NTIS' long range plans. The closed session discussion is 
scheduled to begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 12:30 p.m. on November 25, 
1997. The session will be closed because premature disclosure of the 
information to be discussed would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of NTIS' business plans.

DATES: The meeting will convene on November 25, 1997, at 8:30 a.m. and 
adjourn at 4:00 p.m.


[[Page 55396]]


ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in Room 2029 Sills Building, 
National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, 
Springfield, Virginia 22161.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public participation 
from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on November 25, 1997. Approximately thirty 
minutes will be set aside on November 25, 1997, for comments or 
questions from the public. Seats will be available for the public and 
for the media on a first-come, first-served basis. Any member of the 
public may submit written comments concerning the Board's affairs at 
any time. Copies of the minutes of the open session meeting will be 
available within thirty days of the meeting from the address given 
below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Lucas, NTIS Advisory Board Secretary, National Technical 
Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161 
Telephone: (703) 487-4636; Fax (703) 487-4093.

    Dated: October 20, 1997.
Donald R. Johnson,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-28220 Filed 10-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28938]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 76-97]


Foreign-Trade Zone 143--Sacramento, CA; Application for Subzone 
Status; The Gymboree Corporation (Apparel, Accessories and Toys), 
Dixon, California

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) by the Port of Sacramento, grantee of FTZ 143, requesting 
subzone status for the warehousing/distribution facility of the 
Gymboree Corporation (Gymboree), located in Dixon, California, some 25 
miles west of Sacramento. The application was submitted pursuant to the 
provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-
81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was 
formally filed on October 24, 1997.
    The facility (300,000 sq. ft. on 15 acres; 100 employees) is 
located at 2299 Kids Way in Dixon. It is used to store, distribute and 
repackage a wide range of consumer products, including children's 
apparel, accessories, shoes and toys, most of which are sourced from 
abroad. The products are distributed throughout the U.S. and abroad.
    Zone procedures would exempt Gymboree from Customs duty payments on 
the foreign products that are reexported. On its domestic sales, it 
would be able to defer Customs duty payments on foreign-sourced items. 
The application indicates that zone savings would help improve the 
international competitiveness of the distribution facility.
    In accordance with the Board's regulations, a member of the FTZ 
staff has been appointed examiner to investigate the application and 
report to the Board.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
(original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive 
Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is 
December 30, 1997. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted 
during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-
day period January 14, 1998.
    A copy of the application and accompanying exhibits will be 
available for public inspection at each of the following locations:

U.S. Department of Commerce Export Assistance Center, 917 7th St., 2nd 
Floor, Sacramento, California 95814
Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 
3716, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, D.C. 20230.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28938 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
#### John David ATCHISON v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY.

No. 9231.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

June 13, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 26, 1978.

*600Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Reserve, for plaintiff-appellant.

Joseph P. Henican, III, Henican, James & Cleveland, New Orleans, for defendant-ap-pellee.

Before SAMUEL, REDMANN and STOULIG, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

Defendant employer designed and constructed grain bins and their feeder system (screws, drive, shaft and pneumatic lines) which defendant employed at its grain facility. Plaintiff, an employee of defendant, lost his leg at an accident while at work at that facility.

Plaintiff alleged that improper design and construction by defendant caused his loss. He seeks to hold defendant liable under a theory of “products liability” and he argues that the exclusivity of workmen’s compensation, La.R.S. 23:1032, excludes only ordinary tort liability and not products liability. We reject this argument and affirm the dismissal of his action against his employer.

“Products liability” is but a catchword, a descriptive categorization, like “slip and fall” or “medical malpractice”. The liability that arises in any of these categories is the result of fault causing damage; La.C.C. 2315. Accordingly, we see no reason to justify escape for products liability from R.S. 23:1032’s peremptory denial “of all other rights and remedies” against the employer. A stranger is liable for injury caused by his defective product, just as he is liable for injury caused by dropping a hammer. It is no more unfair, and no more fair, in one instance of asserted liability than in the other, to trade that liability for workmen’s compensation liability when the alleged tortfeasor is the employer of the injured person.

The wording of R.S. 23:1032 is unmistakable. No constitutional infirmity is suggested as arising in the case of products liability. There is no cause of action in “products liability” against one’s employer for injury for which the employer owes workmen’s compensation.1

Affirmed.

1

. *Accord, Winkler v. Hyster Co.,*1977, 54 Ill.App.3d 282, 12 Ill.Dec. 109, 369 N.E.2d 606.
#### Shirley GLOVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-170.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
officeat __ ~E=M=A~C=ar~g=o~W~e=s=t.~E=a=st~M~id=la=n=d~s~A~im~ort~·~D=e=r~by~D=E~74~2T~R=·~U=n=i=te=d~K=i=ng~d=o=m~--­

(Address) 

hereby designates, pursuant to section 46103 ofTitle 49 ofthe U.S. Code (formerly section IOOS(b) ofthe 

Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended) the person named below as its Agent upon whom service of all 

notices and process, and all orders, decisions, and requirements of the Department ofTransportation may be 

made for and on behalf of said carrier, hereby canceling all previous designations of agents made by it to the 

DOT. 

NameofAgent ________ -=D-av~id~H=e~ffi=er~n=an~--------------

(Please Print) 

Address Cozen O'Connor, 1627 I Street, NW, Suite II 00, Washington, DC 20006 

(202) 463-2537 (direct): dheffernan@cozen.com (e-mail) 

The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: 

Name--------------------(Initials) --------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, __ r!.-JL~o~.~i.u. lollr.e~--------- has caused these 

(Name of Company) 

presents to be signed in its name by -- ...:.:::......; (..... ;,..__ __ .;...; __;_......;.....;..._ __ ..;..._- (~,;...._ ___ , President 

(Please Print) 

of said company, and to be attested under its corporate seal by 

on this & 1lt day of Alf&t< sr 

ATTEST: 

(Secretary, or other officer) 

OST F 1010.5 (1-95) 

(Secretary, or other Title) 

By: ________ ~r-~~~--~~~~--- Paul 61shop 

Managing Director 

DHLAir ltd
#### Ernest ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-147.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 11, 1970.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and Edwin T. Mulock, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael N. Kavouklis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Perkins v. State, Fla.1969, 228 So.2d 382, and Simmons v. United States, 1968, 390 U.S. 377, 88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247.

HOBSON, C. J., and MANN, and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1826

TANYA ANGE DAVIS; BARBARA WILLIAMS; MICHAEL

ANGE; KAREN ANGE; JOHN ANGE; SANDRA ANGE,

incompetent, by her next friend, John Ange;

TANYA JEAN ANGE, infant, by her next friend,

Barbara Williams; GABRIELLE ANGE, infant, by

next friend, Michael Ange; BARBARA JEAN ANGE,

infant, by her next friend, John Ange,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; JOHN OLIVER, Deputy City

Attorney; WALTER D. CLARK, Director, Department of Social Services, City of Chesapeake;

CATHERINE B. GOLDBERG, Assistant Director,

Department of Social Services, City of Chesapeake; CAROL B. KERPELMAN, Chief of Services,

Department of Social Services, City of Chesapeake; PHYLLIS B. STEEN, Supervisor of Foster

Care, Department of Social Services, City of

Chesapeake; MARGARET B. HOUSTON, Social

Worker, Department of Social Services, City

of Chesapeake; JAMES D. CLARK, Social Worker,

Department of Social Services, City of

Chesapeake; DONNA J. CAMPBELL, Social Worker,

Department of Social Services, City of

Chesapeake; SUSAN B. WALLACE, Social Worker,

Department of Social Services, City of

Chesapeake; RAYMOND D. MCCOY, LCSW; WEARE A.

ZWEMER, LCP,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-524-2)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 20, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tanya Ange Davis, Barbara Williams, Michael Ange, Karen Ange, John

Ange, Sandra Ange, Tanya Jan Ange, Gabrielle Ange, Barbara Jean

Ange, Appellants Pro Se. Darlene Paige Bradberry, Thomas Jeffrey

Salb, BREEDEN, MACMILLAN & GREEN, Norfolk, Virginia; Ronald Stuart

Hallman, City Attorney, Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's order denying relief on

their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. City of

Chesapeake, No. CA-95-524-2 (E.D. Va. May 17, 1996). We deny Appellants' motions for an informal hearing and for the appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED