alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 16, 2018

NO. 03-17-00665-CV

In the Matter of C. Z.

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the order signed by the juvenile court transferring appellant to the Texas 

Department of Criminal Justice. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the 

Court holds that there was no reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court affirms the 

juvenile court’s order. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of 

costs is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3799 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3799

 To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to evaluate how 
the frequency of summary notices provided to patients can be increased, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2024

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to evaluate how 
the frequency of summary notices provided to patients can be increased, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Organization Report 
Enhancing (MORE) Summaries Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASING THE FREQUENCY OF SUMMARY NOTICES PROVIDED TO 
              MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES.

    Section 1115A of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1315a) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2)(A), by adding at the end the 
        following new sentence: ``The models selected under this 
        subparagraph shall include the testing of the model described 
        in subsection (h).''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) Increasing the Frequency of and Performing Usability Testing 
on Summary Notices.--
            ``(1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
        enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall establish and 
        implement a model under which--
                    ``(A) the frequency of the explanation of Medicare 
                benefits under section 1806(a) that is provided to 
                individuals for whom payment is made under title XVIII 
                is increased, either by mail or virtually; and
                    ``(B) the Secretary annually performs usability 
                testing to ensure that individuals for whom payment is 
                made under title XVIII understand how to identify fraud 
                based on the information provided in the explanation of 
                Medicare benefits provided to such individuals under 
                section 1806(a).
            ``(2) Report to congress.--In addition to the report 
        required by subsection (g), not later than 1 year after the 
        date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall 
        submit a report to Congress on the progress of the model in 
        paragraph (1) and how such model will increase the frequency of 
        the explanation of benefits in a timely manner.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### James Alfred HILLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1068.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 27, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 11, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IES Report

 SANITIZED
#### Elizabeth JULIANO, Appellant, v. The CENTRAL NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF OMAHA, and The American Arbitration Association, Appellees.

No. 69-272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 14, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, John C. East, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Actel Corporation on Form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Reporton Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Actel Corporation.         By: /s/ John C. East       John C. East      Chief Executive Officer      Actel Corporation       I, Jon A. Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Actel Corporation on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such AnnualReport on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Actel Corporation.         By: /s/ Jon A. Anderson       Jon A. Anderson      Chief Financial Officer      Actel Corporation
Project 

Number

County Project Name Project Scope Exempt 

Activity

Exempt 

Date

Project 

Partners

WFLHD-FHWA Contact Information

WA FLAP 

PACIFI 

12800(2)

Pacific 67TH PLACE PUBLIC 

ENHANCEMENT TO WILLAPA 

NWR

The scope of the geotech 

investigations includes two borings 

within and accessed by previously 

disturbed areas with no known 

cultural resources present.

A-23 3/21/23 Pacific County, 

Willapa NWR

Michael Schurke (FHWA Archaeologist) - michael.schurke@dot.gov; Holly 

Weiss-Racine - holly.weiss-racine@dot.gov; Scott Smithline - 

scott.smithline@dot.gov; WFLHD-FHWA Main Phone - 360-619-7700

WFLHD-FHWA 2018 SECTION 106 PA PROJECTS TRACKING SHEET

CALENDAR YEAR 2023
<PAGE>

Ex-10.51
Placement Agreement between the Company and Jack King


                                  EXHIBIT 10.51


September 10, 1999


Mr. Jack King
Southcourt, Ltd.
Irvine, CA 92602

RE: TELEGEN OFFERING

Dear Jack,

Telegen Corporation is pleased to compensate you for your assistance in placing
up to $13.9 million in financing either through an offering of Telegen
post-reorganization common stock, an offering of Telegen Display Laboratories,
Inc., common stock or through a bridge loan offering which converts into
post-reorganization Telegen common stock. This compensation would be in the form
of a placement fee equal to 5% of the net money raised through your sources and
would be payable in post-reorganization Telegen common stock.

As to the compensation regarding the sale of Telegen post-reorganization stock
or debt, this agreement is subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court,
which we do not believe should be an issue. I have instructed our Counsel to
make the appropriate applications to the Court for such approvals.

Thanks for again for your assistance.

Best regards,

/S/ JESSICA L STEVENS

Jessica L. Stevens
President/CEO



AGREED:

   /S/ JACK KING
-----------------------
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

University of Iowa Hospitals, et al.; Notice of Decision on 
Applications for Duty-free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Decision: Denied. Applicants have failed to establish that domestic 
instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments 
for the intended purposes are not available.
    Reasons: Section 301.5(e)(4) of the regulations requires the denial 
of applications that have been denied without prejudice to resubmission 
if they are not resubmitted within the specified time period. This is 
the case for the following dockets.
    Docket Number: 96-017. Applicant: University of Iowa Hospitals and 
Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242. Instrument: [<SUP>18F] Synthesis Module. 
Manufacturer: Nuclear Interface GmbH, Germany. Date of Denial without 
Prejudice to Resubmission: August 21, 1996.
    Docket Number: 95-109. Applicant: University of California, 
Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94722. Instrument: Energy Dispersive 
Spectrometer. Manufacturer: Oxford Instruments, United Kingdom.
    Date of Denial without Prejudice to Resubmission: April 2, 1996.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-2879 Filed 2-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
AG GECC PPIF GP, LLC 

c/o Angelo, Gordon & Co., L.P. 

245 Park Avenue, 26th Floor 

New York, NY 10167 

Mr. Herbert M. Allison, Jr. 

Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability 

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20220 

 March 15, 2010 

Dear Mr. Allison: 

Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of AG GECC

PPIF Master Fund, L.P., dated as of October 30, 2009 (as the same may be amended, modified or 

supplemented from time to time, the “Partnership Agreement”) and (ii) the Loan Agreement, dated as of 

the date set forth on Schedule A thereto, by and among AG GECC PPIF Master Fund, L.P., as borrower, 

The Bank of New York Mellon, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and The United States 

Department of the Treasury, as lender (as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented from 

time to time, the “Loan Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings 

set forth in the Partnership Agreement or the Loan Agreement, as applicable. 

In connection with the Legacy Securities Public-Private Investment Program, the General Partner 

hereby represents that it or any of its Affiliates has received a written representation (each, an 

“Underlying Representation”) from each Private Investor listed in Exhibit I that the amount set forth 

opposite its name on Exhibit I represents capital that was directly or indirectly committed to the 

UST/TCW Senior Mortgage Securities Fund, L.P. (the sum of such amounts being the “Aggregate 

Reallocated Capital”). The General Partner further represents that the materials attached as Exhibit II

hereto provide true and complete evidence of each Underlying Representation. 

In reliance on the foregoing representations, UST hereby agrees that (i) notwithstanding Section 

3.1(g) of the Partnership Agreement, the Capital Commitment of UST to the Partnership may exceed 

$1,111,111,111.00 to the extent of the Aggregate Reallocated Capital and (ii) notwithstanding anything to 

the contrary in the Loan Documents, upon the increase of the Capital Commitment of one or more Private 

Vehicles in respect of all or any portion of the Aggregate Reallocated Capital, the Maximum UST Debt 
Amount shall be increased in an amount equal to twice the amount of such portion of the Aggregate 

Reallocated Capital. 

* * * * 



EXHIBIT I 

Private Investor List 

Private Investor Capital Commitment

 
EXHIBIT II 

[Sponsor to provide evidence of Private Investor(s)’ representations.]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00649-CR

Jennifer Ann Meek, a/k/a Jennifer Ann Martin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 68634, HONORABLE FANCY JEZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Jennifer Ann Meek, a/k/a Jennifer Ann Martin, has filed a motion

requesting that this appeal be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal.

__________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Henson and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: March 22, 2012

Do Not Publish
# L_2005274EN.01007701.xml

| 20.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 274/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 274/77

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1713/2005

of 19 October 2005

providing for the rejection of applications for export licences in relation to certain processed products and cereal-based compound feedingstuffs

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003 of 28 July 2003 laying down special detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences for cereals and rice (2), and in particular Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas:

The quantity covered by applications for advance fixing of refunds on potato starch and maize-based products is of great importance and could give rise to speculation. It has therefore been decided to reject all applications for export licences of such products made on 17, 18 and 19 October 2005,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In accordance with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003, applications for export licences with advance fixing of refunds for products falling within CN codes 1102 20 10, 1102 20 90, 1103 13 10, 1103 13 90, 1104 23 10, 1108 12 00, 1108 13 00, 1702 30 51, 1702 30 91, 1702 30 99, 1702 40 90 and 1702 90 50 made on 17, 18 and 19 October 2005 shall be rejected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 October 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 189, 29.7.2003, p. 12. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1092/2004 (OJ L 209, 11.6.2004, p. 9).

2

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1923

WEST VIRGINIA CWP FUND, as carrier for C.C. Conley & Sons, Inc.,

Petitioner,

v.

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; DOYLE G. BAILES,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (15-0439-BLA)

Submitted: May 22, 2017 Decided: June 1, 2017

Before TRAXLER, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey R. Soukup, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Lexington, Kentucky, for Petitioner. M. 

Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Maia S. Fisher, Associate Solicitor, Sean G. Bajkowski,

Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Jeffrey S. Goldberg, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Carl Hostler, PRIM LAW FIRM, PLLC, Hurricane, West 

Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

West Virginia CWP Fund seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision 

and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant 

to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-944 (2012). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s 

decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, 

we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. W. Va. CWP Fund v. 

Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, No. 15-0439-BLA (B.R.B. June 16, 2016). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           5,683
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         558,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 610,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        131,935
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       451,766
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,270)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   610,394
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,771
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,859
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,572
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,572
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,572
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or her capacity
as an officer of QRS Corporation (the Company), that, to his or her knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Annual Report of the Company of Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    ELIZABETH A. FETTER                                              
|Elizabeth A. Fetter President and Chief Executive
Officer March 15, 2004



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    DAVID B. COOPER, JR.                                                       
|David B. Cooper, Jr. Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer March 15, 2004
March 25, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE ESTATE OF THOMAS ALFRED LERA, SR., DECEASED

NO. 14-12-01071-CV 

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on November 20, 2012. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Janice D. Loyd, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Thomas A. Lera.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33475]


C&NC Railroad Corporation--Lease and Operation Exemption--Lines 
of the Norfolk and Western Railway Company and Indiana Hi Rail 
Corporation

    C&NC Railroad Corporation (CNUR), a noncarrier, has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to lease and operate 
the Connersville Line (Line) in the State of Indiana, consisting of 
27.62 miles of rail line. CNUR will lease from the Norfolk and Western 
Railway Corporation (NW) and operate the 22.42-mile portion of the rail 
line that is owned by NW: (1) from Beesons, (N&W milepost 4.80), to New 
Castle, (N&W milepost 25.30--Thornburg Street); and (2) from milepost 
0.0 to 1.92, in New Castle, (the New Castle Industrial Track). R. 
Franklin Unger, Trustee of the Indiana Hi Rail Corporation (Hi Rail) 
currently leases and operates the NW portion of the Line.
    The remaining 5.2 miles of the Line, from Beesons, milepost 5.2, to 
Connersville, milepost 0.0, is owned and operated by Hi Rail and is the 
subject of a separate acquisition exemption in STB Finance Docket No. 
33476, C&NC, L.L.C.--Acquisition Exemption--Indiana Hi Rail 
Corporation. CNUR has entered into an agreement with C&NC, L.L.C. 
(CLLC) to lease from CLLC and operate the Beesons to Connersville 
portion of the Line.
    CNUR will grant to NW incidental trackage rights over the main and 
auxiliary tracks of CNUR for non-revenue operations between mileposts 
CB-25.30 (through C.B. 25.00=R-00) and R-0.80.
    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or after the 
October 15, 1997 effective date of the exemption. The transaction is 
related to the Hi Rail Trustee's filing of an Amended Plan of 
Reorganization with the Board in STB Finance Docket No. 33491 on 
October 3, 1997.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33475, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Richard R. Wilson, Esq., 1126 Eighth Avenue, Suite 403, 
Altoona, PA 16002.

    Decided: October 21, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28786 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P