alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33487]


Iowa Northern Railway Company--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--Union Pacific Railroad Company

    Iowa Northern Railway Company (IANR), a Class III rail carrier, has 
filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire 
and operate an 8,692-foot portion of rail line, known as the Bristow 
Subdivision, owned by Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP), between the 
crossing of the UP and IANR lines at MP 288.8 and the end of the 
Bristow Subdivision at approximately MP 287.4 (end of track) to the 
east of that crossing in Clarksville, IA.\1\ The transaction was 
expected to be consummated as soon as practicable after October 9, 
1997, the effective date of the exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ IANR states that, although the official UP milepost 
designations suggest a track length of 1.4 miles, IANR personnel 
have measured the track length as 8,692 feet, or approximately 1.6 
miles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33487, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit,1925 K Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20423-0001 and served on: David A. Hirsh, Harkins 
Cunningham, 1300 19th Street, N.W., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036.

    Decided: October 9, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27602 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29038]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE


Termination of the Prospective Payment Assessment Commission and 
the Physician Payment Review Commission.

AGENCY: General Accounting Office.

ACTION: Notice of termination of Commissions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 requires the Comptroller 
General, after the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission has been 
established, to provide for the termination of the Prospective Payment 
Assessment Commission and the Physician Payment Review Commission. This 
notice announces the termination of the two commissions.

DATES: Termination of Commissions effective November 1, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The General Accounting Office is at 441 G St. NW., 
Washington, DC, 20548. The Office of the Chairman of the Medicare 
Payment Advisory Commission is at 2120 L St. NW., Washington, DC, 
20037-1527.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: General Accounting Office: Walter S. 
Ochinko, 202-512-7157. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission: Lauren 
LeRoy, 202-653-7220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 1805 of the Social Security Act, as 
added by section 4022 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Pub. L. 105-
33, 111 Stat. 251, 350), requires the Comptroller General, in 
consultation with the Prospective Payment Assessment Commission (PPRC) 
and the Physician Payment Review Commission (ProPAC), to provide for 
their termination as quickly as possible after a majority of members of 
the new Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) are appointed. 
All of the members of MedPAC were appointed effective October 1, 1997. 
As determined in consultation with them, both PPRC and ProPAC will 
terminate as of November 1, 1997. MedPAC will then assume outstanding 
obligations of PPRC and ProPAC.
James F. Hinchman,
Acting Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. 97-29038 Filed 10-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1313

CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

R. TALATI, Inc., A Ohio Corporation; PRAVIN

TALATI,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.

(CA-02-1486-DKC)

Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 16, 2004

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Onkar N. Sharma, SHARMA & BHANDARI, Silver Spring, Maryland, for

Appellants. James G. Healy, CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL,

INCORPORATED, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

R. Talati, Inc., a Ohio Corporation, and Pravin Talati

appeal the district court’s order confirming an arbitration award

in favor of Choice Hotels International, Incorporated. We have

reviewed the briefs filed by the parties and the record on appeal

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Choice Hotels Int’l v.

Talati, No. CA-02-1486-DKC (D. Md. filed Feb. 14, 2003 & entered

Feb. 19, 2003). 

We dispense with oral argument because we have granted

Appellants’ uncontested motion to submit the case on the briefs and

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



             PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 1350
                            (furnished but not filed)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of ViaVid Broadcasting Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian
Kathler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Brian Kathler
    -------------



Brian Kathler
Chief Financial Officer
June 24, 2005
# L_2005052EN.01003101.xml

| 25.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 52/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 52/31

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 316/2005

of 24 February 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 18 to 24 February 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 313, 12.10.2004, p. 10.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

V E RED EMANO and BERNARD EMANO
, Appellant s ,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS TRUSTEE RALI

2006

- QS15,

Appellee.

No. 4D 22

- 2085

[ May 18, 2023 ]

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Andre a Gundersen

, Judge; L.T. Case No.

CACE10043460

.

Mark L. Pomeranz of Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., Hallandale, for appellants.

Eve A. Cann of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, F ORST a nd A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

133 CAF 11-01240 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF AIDEN J.W.

--------------------------------------------- NIAGARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PETITIONER-RESPONDENT;
MICHAEL E.M., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

KATHLEEN E. CASEY, BARKER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
SUSAN M. SUSSMAN, NIAGARA FALLS, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
ALVIN M. GREENE, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO, FOR AIDEN J.W.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Niagara County (John F. Batt, J.), entered June 13, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order terminated the parental rights of respondent. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order finding that he permanently neglected his child and terminating his parental rights. We reject the father’s contention that Family Court failed to consider the appropriate factors, including the “special circumstances of an incarcerated parent,” in determining that the child was permanently neglected (Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]). Indeed, we agree with the court that the father “has failed to demonstrate any commitment to the responsibilities of parenthood and demonstrates a fundamental defect in his understanding of proper parenting responsibilities.” The petitioning agency is not required to “ ‘guarantee that the parent succeed in overcoming his or her predicaments’ . . . but, rather, the parent must ‘assume a measure of initiative and responsibility’ ” ( Matter of Whytnei B. [Jeffrey B.] , 77 AD3d 1340, 1341).

Entered: April 26, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of American United Gold Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, David Uppal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of February, 2007.

BY:
/s/ DAVID UPPAL                        David  Uppal, Principal Executive Officer **
STEPHEN ANTONIO HAWKINS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 0368

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 8, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Russell L. Healey

, Judge

. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm this appeal in all respects, but write to address the trial court’s

imposition of the $100 Sheriff’ s Investigatory Costs

. The appellant filed a Florida2 Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion challenging the imposition of the

costs where ther e was no record indication that the agency had requested them, and

t he State concedes error . While the trial court eventually entered an order partially

granting the appellant’s motion and striking the costs , the order and the amended

judgment and sentenc e were filed more than sixty days from the date the appellant

filed his motion. As such, the order and corrected judgment and sentence are legal

nullities. See Ogden v. State , 117 So. 3d 479, 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

We affirm the appellant’s convicti on and sentence, but remand for entry of a

corrected judgment and sentence striking the $100 Sheriff’s Investigatory Costs.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-1201 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TELECOMMUNICATION 

Use of 4940-4990 MHz Band 

 Protocol Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MEXICO 

Signed at Washington December 1, 2009 

 

 

 with 

 Appendices 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MEXICO 

Telecommunication: Use of 4940-4990 MHz Band 

 Protocol signed at Washington December 1, 2009; 

 Entered into force December 1, 2009. 

 With appendices.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Dion Vernon Williams v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-19-00783-CR

Trial court case number: 1577604

Trial court: County Criminal Court No. 9 of Tarrant County

Appellant’s retained counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and appoint appellate counsel, 

averring that appellant was found to be indigent by the trial court. Counsel’s request to withdraw 

is granted. However, because appointing counsel is a function of the trial court, we abate and 

remand the cause to the trial court to determine whether appellant is still indigent and, if so, to 

appoint appellate counsel. The trial court clerk is directed to file, within 30 days of the date of this 

order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings, recommendations, and 

any order made. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c). Counsel’s related motion for expedited consideration 

and to stay appellate briefing deadlines is dismissed as moot.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. 

The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the trial court’s determination is filed in this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Gordon Goodman__________

Acting individually 

Date: February 11, 2020
#### Henry Nathaniel McCREE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-46.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

July 8, 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 31, 1969.

Charles Tindell, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James Robert Yon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.2 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77648) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan of CygneDesigns, Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77650) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Cygne Designs, Inc. of our report dated April 2, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Cygne Designs, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in The Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2004. 

 

/S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

New York, New York 

April 30, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59846-59847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29186]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southwest Oregon Provincial Interagency Executive Committee 
(PIEC), Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southwest Oregon PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on 
November 20 at the Douglas County Library, at 1409 NE Diamond Lake 
Blvd. in Roseburg, Oregon. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and 
continue until 5:00 p.m. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Survey 
and Manage requirements of the Northwest Forest Plan; (2) Province 
monitoring priorities; (3) Forest health issues; (4) Report from 
Aquatic Conservation Subcommittee; (5) Report from local BLM and Forest 
Service on local issues; and (6) Public comment. All Province Advisory 
Committee meetings are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Chuck Anderson, Province Advisory Committee staff, USDA, 
Forest Service, Rogue River National Forest, 333 W. 8th Street, 
Medford, Oregon 97501, phone 541-858-2322.


[[Page 59847]]


    Dated: October 27, 1997.
James T. Gladen,
Forest Supervisor, Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 97-29186 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### Thomas LANCASTER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44745.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 21, 1974.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ, concur.
No. 9942.

#### The Park National Bank *v.*The Traveler's Insurance Co.

.(Decided February 5, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

*Messrs. Carr, Stearns & Chamberlain,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Hoyt, Dustin & Kelley,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                 [Letterhead]

                                       January 13, 1998

David Vailloancourt
Chief Financial Officer
TransMedia
1 Hurlingham Business Park
Sulivan Road
London SW 6 3DU

Dear David,

    This is to confirm my current outstanding loan to TME of $2,000,000 for
the acquisition of Countdown. Total interest is outstanding and I have
extended the expiration date for an indefinite period of time and will
provide at least 60 days notice of required repayment.

                                       Sincerely,

                                       /s/ Joseph V. Vittoria
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Joseph V. Vittoria

JVV:puf
#### William L. BUTTS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-732.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 24, 1973.

Rehearing denied Nov. 21, 1973.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Elliott C. Metcalfe, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David Luther Woodward, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and McNULTY and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

MANN, Chief Judge.

We affirmed Butts’ conviction without opinion. We treat his letter of November 2, 1973 as a petition for rehearing. Upon reconsideration of the record and briefs in the case, rehearing is denied. Butts’ assertion that the guilty party was acquitted overlooks the fact that an aider and abetter is equally guilty. Fla.Stat. § 776.011 (1971), F.S.A. The evidence of Butts’ participation in this robbery is legally sufficient.

*29His complaint about failures of trial counsel properly to prepare and present his case raises questions reachable by petition to the trial court under CrPR 3.850, 33 F.S.A.

Rehearing denied, without prejudice to appellant’s right to proceed in the trial court under CrPR 3.850.

McNULTY and GRIMES, JJ., concur.