alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-1113.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CIVIL AVIATION 

Transport Services 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and JAPAN 

Relating to and Amending the 

Agreement of August 11, 1952, as 

Amended 

 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Tokyo November 13, 2010 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 JAPAN 

 Civil Aviation: Transport Services 

 Agreement relating to and amending the 

 agreement of August 11, 1952, as 

 amended. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at Tokyo 

 November 13, 2010; 

 Entered into force November 13, 2010. 



1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
#### BIRMINGHAM FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, a corporation, subrogee of Golden Glades Building Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Appellee.

No. 76-1637.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 19, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1977.

*647Underwood, Gillis, Karcher, Reinert & Gordon, Miami, for appellant.

Jones & Morcroft, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff subrogee, Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, appeals a summary final judgment for defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, in this negligence action.

Golden Glades Building Corporation which was insured by appellant Birmingham had engaged Moss Plumbing Company as a plumbing subcontractor for several buildings it was constructing in Dade County. Effective May 15, 1972 appellee Allstate had issued a liability insurance policy covering Moss Plumbing. As required by ordinance, the policy provided a certificate of insurance to Metropolitan Dade County which contained the following pertinent provision:

> “It is agreed that cancellation of this policy shall not be effective as to the interest of the principal1 hereinafter named until thirty days notice of cancellation has been sent by certified mail to: Metropolitan Dade County, Florida.”

On December 8, 1972 Allstate mailed a notice of cancellation effective January 10, 1973 to Moss Plumbing for non-payment of the premium; but notice of the cancellation was not sent to Dade County. On April 16, 1973 Harrison Mealing, an employee of Moss Plumbing, was installing a hot water heater in one of the buildings under construction when a fire erupted allegedly as a result of his negligent operation of a soldering torch. As a result Golden Glades suffered a $10,192.94 property loss. Birmingham paid Golden Glades for the loss and then Birmingham, as subrogee, filed the instant action against Moss Plumbing, Mealing and Allstate. Allstate answered and moved for summary judgment on the ground its policy with Moss Plumbing was cancelled as of January 10, 1973. After a hearing, summary judgment was entered.

Birmingham appeals and contends the policy was still in effect because Dade County was not given the 30-day cancellation notice as required by the provision set out above.

From a reading of this provision, it is clear that the policy is in effect as to *648the interest of Dade County as the named principal. Appellant, in essence, is arguing that it is covered under the Allstate policy as a third-party beneficiary. As such, its rights are no greater than that of the insured, Moss Plumbing. See *Shingleton*v. *Bussey,*223 So.2d 713, 715 (Fla.1969). The policy was effectively cancelled as to Moss Plumbing and, therefore, appellant Birmingham was not covered under Allstate’s policy on April 16, 1973.

Summary judgment affirmed.

1

. Dade County.
#### Fred SILAS, Petitioner, v. Warren H. EDWARDS, Judge of the Criminal Court of Record, Division A, Orange County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 40760.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 10, 1971.

Louis R. Bowen, Jr., Public Defender, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

*221PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied. See Clawson et al. v. Baker, 245 So.2d 223 (Fla.1971).

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
NO. 12-09-00100-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RICHARD HENDERSON, § APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant, Richard Henderson, pleaded guilty to delivery of a controlled substance. His

sentence was imposed on October 1, 2007. He filed a notice of appeal in this court, but the appeal

was dismissed because Appellant had waived his right to appeal. See Henderson v. State, No. 12-

07-00399-CR, 2007 WL 3173314 (Tex. App.–Tyler Oct. 31, 2007, no pet.). Appellant filed a

second notice of appeal on March 30, 2009.

On April 28, 2009, this court notified Appellant that the information received in this appeal

does not include a final judgment or other appealable order and therefore does not show the

jurisdiction of this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.2. Appellant was further notified that this appeal

would be dismissed unless the information was amended on or before May 8, 2009 to show the

jurisdiction of this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3. Appellant responded, through his counsel of

record, that he cannot provide this court with any records showing that it has jurisdiction of this

appeal. Because Appellant has not shown the jurisdiction of this court, the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

Opinion delivered May 13, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 56207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28545]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Engineering: Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Committee for Engineering (#1170).
    Date and Time: November 4, 1997/8:30 am-5:00 p.m., November 5, 
1997/8:30 am-12:30 p.m.
    Place: November 4 and 5, Room 1235, (National Science Board 
Meeting Room), National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Joseph E. Hennessey, Acting Deputy Assistant 
Director for Engineering, National Science Foundation, Suite 505, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 306-
1301.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations and 
counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to Engineering 
programs and activities.
    Agenda: Discussion on issues, opportunities and future 
directions for the Engineering Directorate; discussion of 
Engineering Directorate budget situation as well as other items. 
Reason for Late Notice: Difficulty in arranging an acceptable 
meeting date for the members.

    Dated: October 23, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-28545 Filed 10-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Herman Albert SCHALK, Petitioner, v. Sandra Louise SCHALK, Respondent.

No. 44714.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 12, 1974.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 58922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28929]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

41 CFR Part 101-11

RIN 3090-AG02


Relocation of FIRMR Provisions Relating to GSA's Role in the 
Records Management Program

AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy, GSA.

ACTION: Interim rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is extending Federal 
Property Management Regulations provisions regarding records 
management.

DATES: Effective date: The interim rule published August 7, 1996 was 
effective from August 8, 1996 through December 31, 1997. The period of 
effectiveness is extended through December 31, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
R. Stewart Randall, Jr., Office of Governmentwide Policy, telephone 
202-501-4469.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FPMR interim rule B1 was published in the 
Federal Register on August 7, 1996, 61 FR 41001. The expiration date of 
the interim rule is December 31, 1997. This supplement extends the 
expiration date through December 31, 1998.

List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 101-11

    Archives and records, Computer technology, Telecommunications, 
Government procurement, Property management, Records management, and 
Federal information processing resources activities.

    Therefore the effective date for interim rule B-1 published at 61 
CFR 41001, August 7, 1996, is extended until December 31, 1998.

    Dated: October 10, 1997.
Thurman M. Davis, Sr.,
Acting Administrator of General Services.
[FR Doc. 97-28929 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twinview, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Patrick K. Hogle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of the
         operation of the Company.

/s/ Patrick K. Hogle
__________________________________
Patrick K. Hogle
Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2003
No. 9477.

#### The American Contracting Co. *v.*Sammon et al.

(Decided November 2, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

*Messrs. Kline, Tolies & Goff,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Kerruish, Chapman & Kerruish,*for defendants in error.

Judgment reversed on authority of *The Cleveland, Painesville & Eastern Railroad Company v. Pritschau,*69 Ohio St., 438.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers. Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
1 

! l 

" w - 0 

:: .!:! ! 0 

:g '!! .!! 

c ... 

e-;. g g e 

...... u o- .. 

0 ! Col 

>] 

! .- -o 0. c. 

..c E .! a. :.= - "'Q D 0 0 

.D 

- 0 0 "'tl (). 

] 6 S-o 

;i 

!a :a. 1i ... 

0. 0. ·- :t ... 

Q -= 0.:: 

Z D .J:: 0 0. 

0 .. ; ¢1 V &I D ., 4-£ 

E 

0 

v 

-o 

c 0 

c 

.£ V> c Q:i 

_. 0> 

-· 

.. c 

ZL 

w -

w 

';( 

'::,! 

Sr-I "I' ' ?P .j I 'I V' . " ·-"' "' 0 v 

:::> 

"' z 

go 

.... :::> 

0 

o" 

0 

o_ 

II)(: 

z 

OE 

::; 

-

z g- c.: !U 0 0 U C 

w .J: ::1 e> 

i 1: 

w c I O..c 

Cl..,c o-c " >-V 

o .... 

e 

V> 

o- zw- 4 <( ._ 0 w u.. 

u: -o .. :l 

;:.0 g' 

a::.s: ·-

u., w - 0 -.:: L - c 

- ] 

0 

< 

o 4 

w 4i 11 v 

u 4i ;::: 

-a. 3 Hi 0 lOS Oi'<f 

UNITED STATES DF AM ERICA GX-1472458 Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administralion 

MEDICAL CERTIFIC

ATE THIRD 

CLASS 

AND 

S

TUDENT PILOT CERTIFICATE 

This certifies that (Full name and address): HAROLD Eduardo CARVAJAL 

13769 SW 145 street 

I Miami FL 33186 

USA 

Date of Birth I Height I Weight I Hair I Eyes I Sex I I 

J0/20/ 1965 I 67 I 196 I BLACK I BROWN I M 

has met the medical standards prescribed in part 67, Federal Aviation 

Re ulations, for this class of Medical Certificate. 

Must have available glasses for near vision. 

V) 

1:: 

0 

! ·e 

:J 

Date of Examination I Designation No. 

03/04/2015 21289 

... Signature 

;,/) Q) 1:: ·e 

., Typed Name -v( )( 

w KEVIN B FOX , DO // 

AIRMAN'S SIGNATURE .,k.£ ApplicantiD: 19991623447 I JControip.o.: 200006799573 

-- ---------- -------- -----------------
No. 9843.

#### The Nypano Railroad Co. et al. *v.*The Cleveland & Southwestern Traction Co.

(Decided January 29, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Wayne County.

*Messrs. Cushing & Clarke*and *Mr. John McSweeney,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Collister & Halle; Mr. M. L. Smyser*and *Messrs. Blandin, Rice & Ginn,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew and Summers, JJ.. concur.

Spear, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3789 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3789

 To make additional Federal public land available for selection under 
the Alaska Native Vietnam era veterans land allotment program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 8 (legislative day, February 7), 2024

 Mr. Sullivan (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make additional Federal public land available for selection under 
the Alaska Native Vietnam era veterans land allotment program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alaska Native Vietnam Era Veterans 
Land Allotment Extension and Fulfillment Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. MAKING ADDITIONAL LAND AVAILABLE FOR SELECTION UNDER THE ALASKA 
              NATIVE VIETNAM ERA VETERANS LAND ALLOTMENT PROGRAM.

    All Federal land identified as suitable for allotment selection in 
the report under subsection (c)(1) of section 1119 of the John D. 
Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act (43 U.S.C. 
1629g-1), and published by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service 
in the report entitled ``Identification of National Wildlife Refuge 
System Lands in Alaska That Should Be Made Available for Allotment 
Selection by Eligible Alaska Native Vietnam Era Veterans'' (November 
2020), shall be made immediately available by the Secretary of the 
Interior for selection in accordance with that section.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1 – CEO
Certification








ROYAL INVEST
INTERNATIONAL CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Invest
International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Gruenbaum, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.








By: /s/ Jerry
Gruenbaum


Jerry
Gruenbaum


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer





November
19, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Donald Glenn DOWDEN v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. et al.

No. 60325.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1977.

In re: Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., et al. applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Natchitoches. 346 So.2d 1311.

Writ denied. The result is correct.
#### Jimmie RICHARDSON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50546.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 1, 1978.

Murray L. Williams, Water Valley, for appellant.

*667A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Wayne Snuggs, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Torbay Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, William Thomas Large, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  May 12, 2004                       /s/William Thomas Large
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            William Thomas Large, President,
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                            Financial Officer
# L_2005078EN.01003601.xml

| 24.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 78/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 78/36

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 481/2005

of 23 March 2005

determining the extent to which applications lodged in March 2005 for import licences for certain poultrymeat products under the regime provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat and certain other agricultural products can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 of 22 June 1994, laying down detailed rules for the application in the poultrymeat sector of the import arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat and certain other agricultural products (1) and in particular Article 4(4) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged for the period from 1 April to 30 June 2005 are, in the case of certain products, for quantities less than or equal to the quantities available and can therefore be met in full, but in the case of other products the said applications are for quantities greater than the quantities available and must therefore be reduced by a fixed percentage to ensure a fair distribution,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 April to 30 June 2005 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

2.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 July to 30 September 2005 may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 for the total quantity as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 156, 23.6.1994, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1043/2001 (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 24).

1

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Percentage of acceptance of import certificates submitted for the period 1 April to 30 June 2005 | Total quantity available for the period 1 July to 30 September 2005
  (t) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 1,23 | 1 775,00 |
| 2 | 100,00 | 1 971,70 |
| 3 | 1,27 | 825,00 |
| 4 | 1,51 | 450,00 |
| 5 | 2,38 | 175,00 |

Group No

Percentage of acceptance of import certificates submitted for the period 1 April to 30 June 2005

Total quantity available for the period 1 July to 30 September 2005

(t)

1

1,23

1 775,00

2

100,00

1 971,70

3

1,27

825,00

4

1,51

450,00

5

2,38

175,00

---
crashes occur.

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

.

.

.

SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

This C a se Study is p a rt of the Saf e S y s t em Approa ch for Spe ed Mana g ement R ep ort : C l i ck he re to r e ad the full r eport h e re.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

 and the 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• Lane width

• 

• 

• 

• 

. 

.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

• 

• 

• 

• 

the downtown area.

• 

• 

• 

Figure 4

Figure 5

low at the intersection.
65

SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

Source: City of Bellevue, Transoft Solutions, Together for Safer Roads, 

and PacTrans – University of Washington.

Source: City of Bellevue, Transoft Solutions, Together for 

Safer Roads, and PacTrans – University of Washington.

The analysis of the Bel-Red Road and NE 30th Street intersection, which had the highest risk for 

motorist speeding, resulted in the following insights:

Northbound and southbound through speeds were high (Figure 6). Only two through movements 

of drivers because of the lower volumes of surrounding movements and the prohibition of several 

other movements. The speeding behavior is similar to that of drivers increasing their speeds to catch 

Figure 7).

 Source: City of Bellevue, Transoft Solutions, Together for Safer Roads, and PacTrans – University of Washington.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

.
#### Ruby M. HILL, Petitioner, v. The HOME INDEMNITY CO., Respondent.

No. 71-557.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 26, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
#### Mattie Mae PERRY, Petitioner, v. Joe N. HOLMES and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a foreign corporation, Respondents.

No. 71-186.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 19, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.