alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AAM-11-034-E November 9, 2010 Exemption No. 10161 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-1121

Mr. Andy Rosman

President

Barrier Island Aviation 407 Airport Road Manteo, NC 27954

Dear Mr. Rosman:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 2, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Barrier Island Aviation for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemp tion, if granted, would allow Barrier IslandAviation, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Barrier Island Aviation.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant of exemption;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Barrier Island Aviation an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Barrier Island Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to

the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Barrier Island Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Barrier Island Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on November 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Dr. Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
April 24, 2012

Ms. Marianne Kump Engineering Manager BAE Systems

1371 SW 8 th Street, Unit #3 Pompano Beach, FL 33069

Dear Ms. Kump:

This is in response to your March 5 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2012-0259) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of BAE Systems Safety Products Inc. (BAE) for an exemption from § 21.614 Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The exemption, if granted, would allow BAE to transfer all of its existing Technical Standard Order (TSO) authorizations to its new wholly owned subsidiary, TK Holdings, Inc.

As you are aware, effective April 16, 2011, 14 CFR § 21.614 [new] reads, “the holder of a TSO authorization or letter of TSO design appr oval may not transfer the TSO authorization or letter of TSO design approval.” The new language means the holder may not transfer a TSO authorization or letter of TSO design approval. However, the FAA can make this transfer and finds that the transfer meets the established requirements.

We suggest you contact your geographical Aircraft Certification Office and request a transfer of your existing TSO authorizations. As the relief you seek is not required through exemption from 14 CFR § 21.614, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo20826 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### Stephen D. BOURGEOIS and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Petitioners, v. Walter Lee ATWOOD, Respondent.

No. 69-751.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 8, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Charles K. Barbo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 28, 2005



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Charles K. Barbo                    
|Charles K. Barbo Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-34362) pertaining to 1,750,000 shares of common stock of Optical
Sensors Incorporated and, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-04373)
pertaining to the Optical Sensors Incorporated 1989 Omnibus Stock Option Plan
and the Optical Sensors Incorporated 1993 Stock Option Plan, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-17493) pertaining to the Optical Sensors
Incorporated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form
SB-2 No. 333-71076) pertaining to 15,539,334 shares of common stock of Optical
Sensors Incorporated, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-71354)
pertaining to the Optical Sensors Incorporated 1993 Stock Option Plan of our
report dated January 18, 2002, with respect to the financial statements of
Optical Sensors Incorporated included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the
year ended December 31, 2001.


                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 19, 2002
# Publications

        -  En español 

Access a wealth of information and downloadable full-text publications on a range of topics, including addiction science, medical consequences, trends and statistics, and the link between drugs and HIV.

Get more information about NIDA publications, image and logo useView Archived Publications

        For more options, see our advanced search page.        

Image

Publications

### 2022-2026 NIDA Strategic Plan

September 2022

Image

DrugFacts

### Naloxone DrugFacts

 | En español

January 2022

Image

Research Report

### Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report

 | En español

December 2021

Image

Publications

### Careers at NIH: Navigating USAJobs as an Academic Scientist

June 2021

Image

DrugFacts

### Fentanyl DrugFacts

 | En español

June 2021

Image

DrugFacts

### Prescription Opioids DrugFacts

 | En español

June 2021

Image

Publications

### National Drug & Alcohol IQ Challenge

 | En español

March 2021

Image

Publications

### Drugs, Brains, and Behavior: The Science of Addiction

 | En español

July 2020

Image

DrugFacts

### Substance Use in Older Adults DrugFacts

 | En español

July 2020

Image

DrugFacts

### Cannabis (Marijuana) Concentrates DrugFacts

 | En español

June 2020

Image

Research Report

### Misuse of Prescription Drugs Research Report

 | En español

June 2020

Image

DrugFacts

### Criminal Justice DrugFacts

 | En español

June 2020

Image

Research Report

### Common Comorbidities with Substance Use Disorders Research Report

April 2020

Image

Research Report

### Substance Use in Women Research Report

April 2020

Image

DrugFacts

### Vaping Devices (Electronic Cigarettes) DrugFacts

 | En español

January 2020

Image

Research Report

### Tobacco, Nicotine, and E-Cigarettes Research Report

 | En español

May 2022

Image

DrugFacts

### Drugged Driving DrugFacts

 | En español

December 2019

Image

DrugFacts

### Cannabis (Marijuana) DrugFacts

 | En español

December 2019

Image

Education

### Mind Matters Series

 | En español

December 2019

Image

DrugFacts

### Substance Use and Military Life DrugFacts

 | En español

October 2019

Image

Research Report

### Methamphetamine Research Report

 | En español

October 2019

Image

Research Report

### Heroin Research Report

 | En español

June 2018

Image

DrugFacts

### Understanding Drug Use and Addiction DrugFacts

 | En español

June 2018

Image

Research Report

### Prescription Opioids and Heroin Research Report

January 2018

Image

DrugFacts

### Over-the-Counter Medicines DrugFacts

 | En español

December 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CI4NET.COM., INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
OCTOBER 31,2000 AS SET FORTH IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH QUARTER AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        114
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,955
<PP&E>                                           6,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 187,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          7
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   187,314
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,657
<CGS>                                           69,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (2,347)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (112,704)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (158)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (112,862)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (3.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.97)



</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Charles F. CARR, Respondent.

No. 43053.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 11, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1973.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari directed to the 2nd District’s opinion report*102ed at 267 So.2d 684 (1972), reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3) (1973) Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby

Discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-990-1020-00]


Resourece Advisory Councils; Notice of a Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Upper Columbia--Salmon Clearwater 
Districts, Idaho.

ACTION: Notice of Resource Advisory Council Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 
Appendix, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the meeting of 
the Upper Columbia--Salmon Clearwater Districts Resource Advisory 
Council (RAC) on Wednesday, December 3, 1997 and Thursday, December 4, 
1997 in Missoula, MT.
    Agenda items include: a briefing on the status of implementation of 
the approved Idaho rangeland standards and guidelines; discussion of 
potential issues for future meetings; the status of the Interior 
Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project; and range improvement/
contributed funds. The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. (MST), December 
3, 1997 and be held at the Grant Creek Inn, 5280 Grant Creek Road, 
Missoula, MT. The public may address the Council during the public 
comment period from 2:00 p.m.-2:30 p.m. on December 3, 1997.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All Resource Advisory Council meetings are 
open to the public. Interested persons may make oral statements to the 
Council, or written statements may be submitted for the Council's 
consideration. Depending on the number of persons wishing to make oral 
statements, a per-person time limit may be established by the District 
Manager.
    The Council's responsibilities include providing long-range 
planning and establishing resource management priorities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted Graf (208) 769-5004.

    Dated: October 22, 1997.
Fritz U. Rennebaum,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-29013 Filed 10-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-66-M
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**WAH KING INVEST CORP.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wah King Invest Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Gruenbaum, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

By: /s/ Jerry Gruenbaum

Jerry Gruenbaum

Chief Executive Officer, and

Chairman of the Board

 

December 21, 2005

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Wah King Invest Corp., and will be retained by Wah King Invest Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 Ogulei, David

From: **Paddock, Nancy <nancy.paddock@veolia.com>** Sent: **Monday, March 03, 2014 1:43 PM** To: **Ogulei, David** Cc: **Dennis Warchol** Subject: **Title V Request regarding material processing areas and emissions calculations** 

Hello David,

Section 2.2(E)(3) of TWI's 2008 Title V permit stat es that the TANKS program must be used to calculate emissions from MP1, MP2 and LPR.

Last year, a consultant reviewed our emissions inve ntory process. The **Surface Evaporation Model from EPA Guidance EIIP Volume II:Chapter 8 Section 4.1.4.**  **Preferred and Alternative Methods for Estimating Ai r Emissions from Paint**  **and Ink Manufacturing Facilities, March 1998. Equa tion 8.4-18 was used to calculate emissions from**  MP1, MP2 and LPR. The consultant compiled an average of 5 years of th e most recent TRI concentration data to determine t he concentration of VOC and HAP in the waste, which wa s then used in the EPA Surface Evaporation Model referenced above.

TANKS is based on routine displacement of liquids. The surface evaporation model is based on the vola tility and ability of a compound to evaporate from the su rface of solids and then be picked up by the air in the building and carried to the atmosphere. The evapor ation method seems to be more appropriate for MP1, MP2 and LPR; TWI would like to change section 2.2(E)(3 ) of the upcoming permit (or the equivalent section thereof) to indicate the Surface Evaporation Model will be used to calculate emissions from these sour ces.

This table compares emissions calculated by both me thods for the same calendar year:

TANKS Model Evaporative

model area TPY lb TPY lb MP-1 0.06 117 0.21 424 MP-2 0.02 44 0.11 212 LABPACK/REPACK 0.03 68 0.04 85

I hope this makes sense. Please let me know if you have questions.

Thank you,

Nancy

Nancy Paddock Environmental Engineering Specialist Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 7 Mobile Avenue Sauget, IL 62201 618.271.2804 (x-115) 618.271.2128 (fax)2 

### Please note that my e-mail address has changed: Nancy.Paddock@Veolia.com

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutio ns, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privi leged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you a re not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all cop ies of the original message and delete it from all computers.
SERVED JULY 6,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MARIA TAVERAS, 

Respondent. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0005 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0316 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER ON USE 

OF INTERPRETER AND MOTION FOR 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

This order disposes of two pending matters: (1) Respondent's request 

for the use of an interpreter; and (2) Complainant's motion for a protective 

order. 

Respondent has inquired about use of an interpreter at the hearing in 

connection with the testimony of one, or possibly two, witnesses. For 

obvious reasons, it is preferable for witnesses to testify in the English 

language. If, however, counsel represents in good faith that a witness for his 

client would be inhibited in his or her testimony, I will appoint an interpreter 

in connection with the proffered testimony of the witness. The interpreter 

should be selected and paid by the party sponsoring the witness, subject to 

possible reimbursement under the Equal Access to Justice Act (5 U.S.C. § 

504) and must be a person who has served as an interpreter in at least one 

prior case in state or federal court. An interpreter who is certified under 28 

U.S.C.§1827(d)(l) would be preferred. 

According to the motion papers filed by the Complainant, medical 

records of one of the Complainant's witnesses may be offered in evidence, 

and the Complainant seeks a protective order to preclude public access to 

such records. The motion is well-taken and, steps will be taken to protect 

the right of personal privacy of such records. So much of the hearing record 

'•. 'Tin' . 

: I'l l l-K. i' 
as relates to such records will be received under seal and will not be 

available for public access in the docket files of this proceeding. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 
FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0005 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Alexei Schacht, Respondent's Counsel 

Nalven & Schacht, Attorneys at Law 

350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4022 

New York, NY 10118 

TEL: 212-616-5540 

FAX: 212-616-5543 

Yolanda Ayala Bemal, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E3, YAH 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Boulevard 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 

TEL: 817-222-5099 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Groimd Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification ofPeriodic Financial ReportPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

Each of theundersigned officers of Dyax Corp. (the “Company”) certifies, under thestandards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofthe Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Dated: March 13, 2007 |     | /s/ Henry E. Blair        |   |
|----------------------------|----------|---------------------------|--------|
|                       |     | Henry E. Blair            |
|                       | * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                       | * * | * *                  |
| Dated: March 13, 2007 |     | /s/ Stephen S. Galliker   |   |
|                       |     | Stephen S. Galliker       |
|                       | * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----