59708 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 213 / Tuesday, November 4, 1997 / Notices

the voting shares of Bank of Rogers,

Rogers, Arkansas.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, October 30, 1997.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 97–29147 Filed 11–3–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–F

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT

INVESTMENT BOARD

Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of

Records

AGENCY: Federal Retirement Thrift

Investment Board.

ACTION: Technical amendment.

SUMMARY: The Executive Director of the

Federal Retirement Thrift Investment

Board (Board) is amending the Board’s

Privacy Act systems of records to show

a change of address for Board offices.

The Board relocated from 805 Fifteenth

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005 to

its current address at 1250 H Street,

NW., Washington, DC 20005 effective

December 20, 1992. The address change

was made to Board regulations in a

November 7, 1994, publication of the

Federal Register (59 FR 55331).

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 4, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas L. Gray, Assistant General

Counsel for Administration, (202) 942–

1662. FAX (202) 942–1676.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the

authority of 5 U.S.C. 8474 (1994), the

Board hereby amends Systems of

Records FRTIB–2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and

11. The systems notice was originally

published in the Federal Register at 52

FR 12065, April 14, 1987, and finalized

at 55 FR 18949, May 7, 1990. The

amendment to the systems of records to

change the Board’s address is set forth

below.

SYSTEMS OF RECORDS FRTIB–2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8,

9, 10, AND 11 [AMENDED]:

Remove the address ‘‘805 Fifteenth

Street’’ and add in its place the address

‘‘1250 H Street’’ in the System Location

and System Manager and Address

sections for each of these systems of

records.

Dated: October 29, 1997.

Roger W. Mehle,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 97–29099 Filed 11–3–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6760–01–M

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[File No. 9723128]

Beylen Telecom, Ltd., Niteline Media,

Inc., and Ron Tan; Analysis To Aid

Public Comment and Agreement

Containing Consent Order

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Proposed consent agreement.

SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this

matter settles alleged violations of

federal law prohibiting unfair or

deceptive acts or practices or unfair

methods of competition. The attached

Analysis to Aid Public Comment

describes both the allegations in the

draft complaint that accompanies the

consent agreement and the terms of the

consent order—embodied in the consent

agreement (which is also attached)—that

would settle these allegations.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before January 5, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be

directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary,

Room 159, 6th St. and Pa. Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Eileen Harrington, Federal Trade

Commission, H–238, 6th St. and

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,

DC 20580. (202) 326–3127. Paul Luehr,

Federal Trade Commission, H–238, 6th

St. and Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC 20580. (202) 326–2236.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant

to section 6(f) of the Federal Trade

Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C.

46, and section 2.34 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice (16 CFR

2.34), notice is hereby given that the

above-captioned consent agreement

containing a consent order to cease and

desist, having been filed with and

accepted, subject to final approval, by

the Commission, has been placed on the

public record for a period of sixty (60)

days. The following Analysis to Aid

Public Comment describes the terms of

the consent agreement (which is also

attached) and the allegations in the

accompanying complaint. An electronic

copy of the full text of the consent

agreement package can be obtained from

the Commission Actions section of the

FTC Home Page, on the World Wide

Web, at ‘‘http://www.ftc.gov/os/

actions97.htm.’’ A paper copy can be

obtained from the FTC Public Reference

Room, Room H–130, Sixth Street and

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,

DC 20580 either in person or by calling

(202) 326–3627.

Public comment is invited. Such

comments or views will be considered

by the Commission and will be available

for inspection and copying at its

principal office in accordance with

section 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s

Rules of Practice (16 CFR 4.9(b)(6)(ii).

Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To

Aid Public Comment

The Federal Trade Commission has

accepted, subject to final approval, an

agreement containing a consent order

from Beylen Telecom, Inc. (‘‘Beylen’’),

NiteLine Media, Inc. (‘‘NiteLine’’), and

Ron Tan (‘‘Tan’’). NiteLine and Tan

have solicited consumers to download

viewer software over the Internet in

order to view computer images. Beylen

has provided telecommunications and

other services to NiteLine and other

‘‘audiotext’’ entities that use telephone

calls to provide information to, and

collect money from, consumers.

The proposed consent order has been

placed on the public record for sixty

(60) days for reception of comments by

interested persons. Comments received

during this period will become part of

the public record. After sixty (60) days,

the Commission will again review the

agreement and the comments received

and will decide whether it should

withdraw from the agreement or make

final the agreement’s proposed order.

This matter concerns allegations

about the manner in which respondents

solicited and billed consumers to use a

software program to view adult images

on the Internet. The Commission has

issued a proposed draft complaint that

sets forth the allegations to be resolved

by the proposed administrative consent

order. The draft complaint closely

parallels the Commission’s federal court

complaint and amended complaint filed

in FTC v. Audiotex Connection, Inc.

CV–97 0726 (DRH) (E.D.N.Y. filed Feb.

13, 1997) against defendants allegedly

engaged in activities similar or related

to those of the respondents. The

proposed draft complaint challenges

three practices of the respondents. First,

the draft complaint alleges that

respondents NiteLine and Tan

misrepresented that consumers could

view adult images at no cost if

consumers downloaded and used the

respondents’ purported ‘‘viewer’’

software. Second, the draft complaint

alleges that respondents NiteLine and

Tan failed to disclose or adequately

disclose material aspects of the

‘‘viewer’’ program, including that the

program would shut off a consumer’s

modem speakers, cut off the consumer’s

modem connection to his local Internet

service provider, and automatically

place an international telephone call

from the consumer’s modem to a remote

Internet site. The draft complaint alleges

that Beylen violated the law by