alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stephen HARRIS and Mike Dale Headley, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2570.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 9, 1977.

Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender, 17th Judicial Circuit, and Stuart M. Lerner, Asst. Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAGER and LETTS, JJ., concur.

DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

DAUKSCH, Judge,

concurring specially:

I concur but feel something should be said. Appellants were charged with possession of drugs after a search around a vehicle they occupied revealed the drugs. They filed a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 3.190, Fla.R.Crim.P., asserting the automobile in which they were riding was forced off the road by the deputies and that they didn’t know “of the presence of these suspected drugs found by the police in the vicinity of the car they had been passengers in. Neither possessed the suspect PCP or suspect marijuana while passengers in the Mustang.” 1

The State traversed the Motion by specifically denying that the deputies forced the car off the road and specifically denying the Defendants didn’t know of the presence of the drugs and further specifically denying that the Defendants did not possess the drugs in the vehicle. A hearing on the Motion to Dismiss was held and the court denied the Motion. The denial was proper because the Rule provides the Motion “shall be denied if the State files a traverse which denies under oath a material fact alleged in the motion to dismiss.” The Appellants would have us hold that the State must, in its traverse, set out affirmatively that the Defendants did know of the presence of and did possess the drugs. Further, they assert the State must set out, under oath, facts to support the traverse. This is not what the Rule requires and if we were to try to make such a requirement we would, in effect, provide two trials for every defendant. One by affidavits in a motion to dismiss and traverse and the other in the classic manner with a judge or jury, trying the facts under the law.

1

. There is no denial of possession while not in the Mustang and no denial of knowledge of the drugs other than within the vicinity of the car. Was that an artfully,drawn limited denial or an inartfully drawn full denial?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-09-1999
<CASH>                                         13,947
<SECURITIES>                                   56,449
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,554
<INVENTORY>                                    25,669
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,512
<PP&E>                                         46,706
<DEPRECIATION>                                 32,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 179,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          52,654
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       21
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   179,708
<SALES>                                        154,427
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,427
<CGS>                                          61,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  31,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               72,963
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,380)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                22,202
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7,215
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,987
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,987
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .68
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1



Rule 13a  14(a) CERTIFICATION



I, Merrill J. Forgotson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Merrill J. Forgotson             
|                        |  | Merrill J. Forgotson                 
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Geneva Clark WATKINS and United Services Automobile Association, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Petitioners, v. Jeanette Leigh BALLANTINE, a minor, by her father and next friend, Elmer L. Ballantine, Individually, Respondents.

No. 73-87.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 25, 1973.

Dismissed.
255 La. 1101

#### Ray PRATHER v. MASSEY-FERGUSON, INC. et al.

No. 50485.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 4, 1970.

In re: 190 Tractor & Equipment Company, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 232 So.2d 80.

The application is denied. The judgment complained of is not final.
DWS VARIABLE SERIES II

    SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUS OF THE LISTED PORTFOLIO:


                             -----------------------

                                     CLASS B

                              DWS Money Market VIP

The Board of Trustees of DWS Variable Series II (the "Trust") has approved the
combination (the "Combination") of the Class B shares of the portfolio of the
Trust listed above (the "Portfolio") into the Class A shares of the Portfolio.
Class A shares do not have a Rule 12b-1 distribution fee and have lower
operating expenses than Class B shares of the Portfolio. The Combination is
scheduled to become effective (the "Effective Date") on or about January 29,
2009 for the Portfolio. As a result of the Combination, the Class B shares
outstanding of the Portfolio on the Effective Date will be converted into Class
A shares of the Portfolio. The number of Class A shares issued as a result of
the Combination will be based on the relative net asset value per share of the
two classes as of the close of business on the Effective Date. The aggregate
value of the Class B shares of the Portfolio held by a shareholder immediately
before the Combination for the Portfolio will be equal to the aggregate value
of the resulting Class A shares held by that shareholder immediately after the
Combination. Class B shares of the Portfolio will no longer be offered after
the Combination.















               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference





                                                                     [Logo]DWS
                                                                   INVESTMENTS
                                                           Deutsche Bank Group

January 26, 2009
VS-MONEY-3601
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dominos Pizza, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 19, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry J. Silverman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Harry J. SilvermanHarry J. SilvermanChief Financial Officer




Dated: August 3, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dominos Pizza, Inc. and will be
retained by Dominos Pizza, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.03

[Troy-Ikoda Limited letterhead]





                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


We hereby consent to the use of the name Troy-Ikoda Limited and of references to
Troy-Ikoda Limited and to the inclusion of and references to our report, or
information contained therein, dated 7th February, 2003, prepared for FX Energy
in the FX Energy, Inc. annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended 31st
December 2002, and the incorporation by reference to the report prepared by
Troy-Ikoda Limited into FX Energy, Inc.'s previously filed Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-80489).

Troy-Ikoda Limited

/s/ Francis Boundy

Francis Boundy
Director
20th March 2003
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Heart Test Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




|                    |  |     |                                      
|------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------
|Date: July 29, 2022 |  | By: | /s/ Danielle Watson                  
|                    |  |     | Danielle Watson                      
|                    |  |     | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer





---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3604 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3604

   To amend title 1, United States Code, to clarify that certain tax 
      exemptions are not treated as Federal financial assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 17, 2024

   Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Vance, Mr. Braun, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. 
 Hawley, Mr. Schmitt, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Lankford, and Mr. Lee) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                               on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 1, United States Code, to clarify that certain tax 
      exemptions are not treated as Federal financial assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safeguarding Charity Act''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE NOT TO INCLUDE CERTAIN TAX 
              BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 9. FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.

    ``In the case of any organization described in subsection (c) or 
(d) of section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or any 
organization described in section 401(a) of such Code, for purposes of 
any Federal law, rule, or regulation, unless explicitly provided 
otherwise, the term `Federal financial assistance,' or any other term 
referring to assistance provided by the Federal government, shall not 
include any exemption from Federal income tax.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for chapter 1 of 
title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new item:

``9. Federal financial assistance.''.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section or the 
amendments made by this section shall be construed to imply that an 
exemption from Federal income taxes under section 501(a) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 constituted assistance from the Federal 
government for periods before the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 9:19 AM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: 

Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary 

Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 

Hi Bob, 

Attached are the handouts from this meeting. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_14_GHGExisitng_NRECA_Handout1.pdf >> 

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_14_GHGExisitng_NRECA_Handout2.pdf >> 

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_14_GHGExisitng_NRECA_Handout3.pdf >> 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: Emission 

Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility 

Generating Units 

When: Monday, April 14, 2014 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). 

Where: Room 10103 New Executive Office Building 

This meeting was requested by John Novak, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Latitude Communications,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Rick M. McConnell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                     The information contained in thisReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                        | **Latitude Communications, Inc.** |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                        |                              |
|                        |                              |
|                        | **By:**                           | **/s/   RICK McCONNELL** |   |
|                        |                              | Rick  McConnell |
|                        |                              | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                        |                              |   |
|                        |                              |   |
| Date:  August 13, 2003 |                              |   |

 

1

----
##### 



Exhibit 10. 42 OXiGENE, Inc.
Named Executive Officers Compensation Arrangements The following are our named executive officers. Their annual salaries and bonus for 2004 were
as follows: Named Executive Officer
    
    Position
    
    2004 SalaryFrederick W. Driscoll
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    
    $
    365,000David Chaplin
    
    Chief Scientific Officer and Head of
Research and Development
    
    $
    365,000Scott Young
    
    Chief Operating Officer
    
    $
    220,000James B. Murphy (1)
    
    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    
    $
    200,000
 (1) Mr. Murphy began employment with the Company on February 23, 2004. The amount in the table
above represents his annual salary and bonus for 2004 and not the amount actually paid in 2004.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906

of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, David K. Grant, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 20, 2006                               
|                                                    
|/S/ DAVID K. GRANT                                  
|David K. Grant President and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY v. Paul KESSLER et al.

No. 7782.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Nov. 17, 1969.

Risky C. Triche, of Triche & Stern-fels, Napoleonville, for defendant-appellant.

Ray A. Barlow, of Hargrove, Guyton, Van Hook & Ramey, Shreveport, and Martin, Himel, Daly, & Peytavin, New Orleans, and Blum, Talbot, Sotile & Car-mouche, Donaldsonville and Napoleonville, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before LOTTINGER, REID and BLANCHE, JJ.

BLANCHE, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in our opinion in United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Landry, 228 So.2d 565, the judgment of the trial court is amended to change the consideration to be paid to defendants by plaintiff from $8,365.34 to $7,445.87.

Judgment amended and as amended affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Product Inspections, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB  for the period ending September 30, 2003, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of  the  Company,  certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of
     the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                         /s/ John Van-Zyll
                         ____________________________________________
                         By: John Van-Zyll
                         Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer
                         November 12, 2003