# M id A mer

Ene r

Do c

2

I o

ww w 

# ican

r gy E f

c ket N

012 A n

t

o wa U t

Ma y

w .midam e 

# Ene r

f

ficie n

N o. E E

n nual R

t o the

t ilities

y 1, 20

e ricanen e 

# r gy C

n cy Pl

E P-08

-

R eport

Boar d

13

e rgy.com / 

# omp a

l an

- 2

/ ee 

# a ny

# Table of Contents

Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. ............1

Residential Equipment ......................................................................................................... ..........12

Residential Audit ............................................................................................................. ..............16

Residential New Construction .................................................................................................. .....19

Residential Load Management ................................................................................................... ...22

Critical Peak Pricing Pilot Program ........................................................................................... ....25

Nonresidential Equipment ...................................................................................................... .......29

Nonresidential Custom.......................................................................................................... .........34

Nonresidential Efficiency Bid Program ......................................................................................... 37

Small Commercial Audit ........................................................................................................ .......40

Nonresidential Energy Analysis Program ......................................................................................43

Commercial New Cons truction Program .......................................................................................49

Nonresidential Load Management ................................................................................................ .55

Appliance Recycling ........................................................................................................... ...........58

Low-Income Program ............................................................................................................ ........62

Multifamily Housing Program ................................................................................................... ....67

Agriculture Program ........................................................................................................... ...........71

Third-Party Program ........................................................................................................... ...........74

Education Program.............................................................................................................. ...........79

Trees Program ................................................................................................................. ...............88

Settlement Agreement Update ................................................................................................... ....92

# 1 Executive Summary

MidAmerican Energy Company (MidAmerican ) presents its annual report on energy

efficiency programs and activit ies during 2012 in its five year plan, 2009-2013. Overall savings

achieved by MidAmerican’s Iowa energy efficien cy programs in 2012 were less than projected,

due in part to continued issues in the nonresidential sector with pa rticipation and size of projects.

The nonresidential equipment program, which deliv ers the majority of nonresidential savings,

improved compared to 2011, but was still signifi cantly lower than 2010 levels. These challenges

faced by the nonresidential electric programs cont ributed to a shift in total program electric

savings, with 45 percent of the total savings be ing achieved through residential electric programs

in 2012, up from 30 percent a year ago. The stro ngest performance in 2012 was seen in the

Residential and Nonresidential Multifamily pr ograms, with electric savings exceeding plan

projections by almost 1,000 percen t while total spending was well below budget. Savings in the

residential sector significantly exceeded goal for electric savings, but were well below goal for

gas, a slight deviation fro m the previous two years.

Various programs continued to be challeng ed by the slow economic recovery, with

customers telling MidAmerican they opted for mo re low-cost or no-cost energy efficiency

measures instead of investing significant dollars on measures with longer paybacks. While this

approach helped increase participation in certain programs, it did not contribute significantly to

overall savings. Several programs are showing encouraging signs related to the economic

recovery for larger customers. The Nonresidenti al Custom program exceeded its goal for gas and

electric savings largely due to lighting meas ures and energy management and HVAC system

improvements. While Nonresidential Energy An alysis experienced high demand for program

services in 2012, savings continued to be lower than plan due to lower than planned average

savings. In the Commercial New Construction program, the averag e size of a completed building

# 2 continued to be smaller than earlier program year s with less potential for savings. New projects

starts leveled off, but the total square footag e and the average size increased over 2011. Natural

gas energy efficiency programs also struggled during the year due to a warm winter and low gas

prices. Customers found it hard to justify an investment in gas energy efficient measures that

didn’t substantially lower ut ility bills, even with a decrease in therms used.

Electric savings to date for the f our-year period 2009-2012 were 897,866,566 kWh,

which are 82 percent of overall planned electric savings for th e period. Natural gas savings for

2009-2012 were 17,630,039 therms, which are 93 percent of overall planned gas savings for the

period.

Electric and Gas Savings Totals for 2012

 Electric savings were 241,520,933 kWh, which are 78 percent of overall planned

2012 year-end savings, and peak demand savings were 329,377 kW, which are 113

percent of overall planned 2012 year-end savings.

 Natural gas therm savings were 4,306,931 therms, which are 82 percent of overall

planned 2012 year-end savings, and peak therm savings were 58,766 therms, which

are 122 percent of overall pl anned 2012 year-end savings.

Spending Totals for 2012

 Electric program spending was $49,748,227, which was 93 percent of overall planned

2012 year-end spending.

 Natural gas program spending was $20,764,796, which was 81 percent of overall

planned 2012 year-end spending.

 Total actual electric and gas pr ogram spending was $70,513,023, which was 90

percent of total planned 2012 spending.

# 3 Savings/Spending Results for Reside ntial and Nonresidential Programs

Residential Programs

 Total electric and gas savings for residential programs were 111,033,459 kWh and

3,068,267 therms respectively, which represen ted 126 percent of total 2012 planned

electric savings and 81 percent of total 2012 planned gas savings.

 Total spending for residential program s was $32,316,129, which is 85 percent of the

2012 plan.

Nonresidential Programs

 Total electric and gas savings for nonresidential programs were 130,487,473 kWh

and 1,238,664 therms respectively, which re presented 59 percent of total 2012

planned electric savings and 84 percent of total 2012 planned gas savings.

 Total spending for nonresidential progra ms was $35,714,706, which is 93 percent of

the 2012 plan.

Progress in Five-Year Plan (2009-2012)

 Electric savings for 2009-2012 were 897,866,566 kWh, which are 82 percent of

overall planned electric savings for the period.

 Natural gas savings for 2009-2012 were 17,630,039 therms, which are 93 percent of

overall planned gas savings for the period.

 Electric program spending for 2009-2012 was $180,641,146, which was 96 percent of

overall planned 2009-2012 electric spending.

 Natural gas program spending for 2009-2012 was $82,981,154, which was 92 percent

of overall planned 2009-2012 gas spending.

# 4  Total program spending for 2009-2012 was $263,622,300, which was 95 percent of

overall planned 2009-2012 spending.

2012 Regulatory Compliance Filings

 February 23, 2012: Reconciliation of Ener gy Efficiency Cost Recovery Factor

 March 12, 2012: Operating Plan Update

 May 1, 2012: 2011 Annual Report

 May 10, 2012: Electric Load Forecast and Class Load Data filed pursuant to

199 IAC 35.11

 May 11, 2012: 1 st 

# Quarter Report filed with the OCA

 August 3, 2012: 2 nd 

# Quarter Report filed with the OCA

 November 20, 2012: 3 rd 

# Quarter Report filed with the OCA

 December 11, 2012: Request for Approval of Customer Notice

 December 20, 2012: Request for Appr oval of Revised Customer Notice

2012 Successes and Administration Issues

Residential Programs:

 Total electric savings from the Residentia l Equipment, Residential New Construction,

Residential Agriculture and Residential Thir d Party programs exceeded goal; total gas

savings from the Residential New Construc tion and Third Party programs exceeded

goal.

 Total electric and gas savings for the Residential Multifamily Housing program

greatly exceeded goal, with customers receiving significant energy savings through

the installation of measures at the time of the audits.

# 5  A second consecutive hot summer helped generate additional electric savings

opportunities for SummerSaver SM 

# , the Residential Load C ontrol program; electric

savings from both peak demand and kWh exceeded program goal.

 1,232,158 self-installed CFLs and 7,196 LED bulb s were rebated through the retail

lighting campaign, a significant increase from last year.

 MidAmerican continued to work closely with schools, through offerings like

eSMARTkids and an assembly program entitled Simply Electrifying , to integrate

energy efficiency education into school cu rriculum and extracurricular activities.

 138,300 residential energy audits have been completed since the inception of

HomeCheck ® 

# , the Residential Audit program. Th e program continued to be well

received by customers, with MidAmeri can receiving 20 compliments from audit

recipients during 2012.

 Participation in the ENERGY STAR porti on of the Residential New Construction

program achieved higher than anti cipated energy savings per home.

 The Appliance Recycling program earned the Responsible Appliance Disposal

designation from the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

 The Low-Income program continued to be nefit from the assistance of the Iowa

Department of Human Rights in deliver ing the program to qualified households;

traditional single-family weatherization services provided through IDHR exceeded

the goal for electric savings.

 The Home Energy Report program generated over 90 percent of th e total electric and

gas savings for the Third-Party program and continued to be popular with customers,

with less than one percent of partic ipants opting-out of the program.

# 6  MidAmerican received the Tree Line USA award by the National Arbor Day Society

for implementing tree management practices that protect and enhance America’s

urban forests.

Non-Residential Programs

 Total electric savings from the Nonresid ential Custom, Small Commercial Energy

Audit, Nonresidential Multifamily, Nonresidential Load Management and the ThirdParty programs exceeded goal; total gas savings from Nonresidential Custom,

Nonresidential Energy Analysis, Nonresidential Multifamily and Third-Party

programs exceeded goal.

 Lighting measures continued to be one of most popular features of many of the

nonresidential programs.

o The lighting portion of the Nonresiden tial Equipment program grew over 10

percent, with almost 91,000 li ghting measures rebated.

o 70 percent of electric savings for the Nonr esidential Custom systems program was

credited to assorted lighting measures.

 Demand for small commercial aud its continued to be high.

 Education-related buildings continued to benefit from the Commercial New

Construction program, with 43 percent of the projects in the program coming from

the education sector.

 Participation in the Variable-Speed Drive program greatly increased, with more than

twice as many variable-speed drives rebated this year compared to 2011.

 Almost 900 HVAC technicians have been trained on quality in stallation of high

efficiency HVAC equipment and systems through the SAVE initiative since 2010.

# 7  Participation in the Agriculture Audit progr am more than doubled from the previous

year.

 Three new projects were successfully im plemented: Building Tune-Up, Money for

Motors and Solid State Lighting Community Grants.

Key Challenges for 2012

 Lower natural gas prices, combined with a warmer than normal 2011-2012 November

to April heating season, reduced consumer concern for energy efficiency and

contributed to lower participation number s for natural gas measures. According to

National Oceanic Atmospheric Administrati on’s National Normal Data Set, the 2011-

2012 heating season was 21 percent warmer than normal and the 2012-2013 heating

season was 2 percent warmer than normal.

 Two consecutive summers with a high number of cycling events caused an increase

in the number of dropouts in the Residential Load Management program.

 Customers remain wary of making large inve stments in energy efficiency measures

due to economic conditions.

 Keeping up with the rapidly changing li ghting technology continued to pose a

challenge for deployment.

 Customers continued to be slow to migr ate to more efficient electric motors.

 The transition to the new ENERGY STAR new home requirements contributed to

some confusion and uncertainty in the marketplace.

 Building awareness and participation in th e Appliance Recycling program has taken

longer than anticipated. It remains a challe nge to persuade loca l appliance and big

box retailers to particip ate in the program.

# 8  Persuading trade allies to participate in the voluntary SAVE program option was a

significant program challenge.

 Gaining participation in the HPwES pilot has proven to be difficult.

 There was significantly less demand for the Energy Wise Home Savings Kits in 2012

compared to 2011.

 Many communities postponed participation in the Trees program until recovery

efforts from severe weather events were completed.

Key Challenges in 2013

 Marketing of the HomeCheck program will be more aggressive to help recover from

a decline in participation.

 Adjustments will need to be made to multiple programs to keep up with new

advanced technologies. Promotion will also need to be adjusted to help educate

customers on which of the new products qualify for rebates and incentives.

 With a decline in Single-Family Weathe rization, SummerSaver and Nonresidential

Load Control participants, new opportunities will need to be explored to increase

participation and drive back up the demand for these programs.

 On-site mentoring and oversight will conti nue to be provided to contractors as

MidAmerican prepares to require SAVE installation on all he ating and cooling

installations in 2014.

 Regular communications on the new ENERGY STAR residential new construction

program requirements will continue to be conducted with raters and builders to

alleviate confusion and uncertainty, a nd encourage program participation.

# 9  The new Appliance Recycling and Agricult ure Audit programs will be aggressively

promoted to increase awareness and participation.

Request for Plan Modi fication or Waiver

The Consumer Advocate Division of the Depart ment of Justice (Consumer Advocate) in

its responses to the energy efficiency co st recovery dockets (TF-2013-0018, TF-2013-0019, TF2013-0022, TF-2013-0031, and TF-2013- 0032) pointed out th at each utilities’ spending deviated

from its 2012 energy efficiency budget. Consumer Advocate argued that these deviations from

the budgets should trigger either a plan modifica tion or request for waiver. On April 3, 2013 the

Iowa Utilities Board (Board) issued an order as king the utilities to re spond by April 25, 2013. In

response, the utilities re quested an extension of time to addr ess the issue in the context of the

annual report, which was granted by the Board.

Iowa Administrative C ode 199-35.6(4)(a) provides:

a. The utility shall file an application to m odify if any one of the following conditions

occurs or is projected to occur during th e current or subsequent calendar year of

implementation of its plan:

(1) The total annual plan budget has changed or will change by a factor of at least

plus or minus 5 percent;

(2) The budget per customer class or grouping has changed or will change by a

factor of at least plus or minus 10 percent;

In response to MidAmerican’s cost recovery factor filing, Consumer Advocate noted that

MidAmerican’s spending for the natural gas energy efficiency plan deviated from the 2012

# 10 budget by more than 15 percent, thereby prompti ng the need for MidAmerican to file a plan

modification.

Iowa Administrative Code 199- 35.7 also allows the Board to waive any energy

efficiency plan requirement upon request a nd for good cause shown. Therefore MidAmerican

requests a waiver of the modification requireme nt because it would be pointless to modify

budgets during the last six months of a five-year plan and because the circumstances leading to

the spending deviation do not support a modification.

Modifications in an approved plan should be based on evidence that circumstances

triggering one of the conditions in subrule 35.4(4)(a) are sustained a nd expected to continue into

the future such that a change should be made. Ot herwise modifications will be chasing past-year

deviations and require conti nuous administrative resources without corresponding benefits.

Review of the circumstances leading to the under spending do not support a plan modification

and provide good cause for a waiver. Gas spendi ng in 2012 was 81 percent of the plan budget,

generating 82 percent of plan savings. Howeve r, review of past plans shows there is no

discernible trend to justify m odification of the present spending budgets. In 2011, MidAmerican

spent 100 percent of its gas budget, generating 87 percent of planned savings. In 2010, 90

percent of gas spending generate d 98 percent of the savings goa l. Under spending in the gas

budget in 2012 was attributable in part to lower participation in Residential Equipment and Audit

programs. For example, fewer water heaters, boile rs and furnaces were rebated in 2012 than in

2011. This may be attributed to low natural gas prices and a very warm winter in 2012, two

factors that drive participati on, but vary from year to year. Commercial New Construction and

Commercial Audit also contribu ted to the under spending. However, while those budgets were

underspent, savings goals were met or exceeded.

# 11 The annual report provides a good forum fo r evaluating the necessity for plan

modification. Data and results for program sp ending and savings are separately evaluated,

providing reasons for variations and trends. In conclusion, MidAme rican seeks a waiver of Iowa

Administrative Code 35.6(4)(a)(2) because modifi cation at this time would be unproductive and

unnecessarily engage administrative resources an d circumstances leading to the under spending

cannot be shown to justify modification.

# 12 Residential Equipment

The Residential Equipment progr am encourages residential customers to purchase highefficiency space conditioning and water heating equipment in existing or new homes. The

program offers incentives for the following qualifying equipment:

 Air conditioners

 Heat pumps

 Water heaters

 Natural gas boilers

 Natural gas furnaces

 Furnace fans

 Appliances

 Lighting

Eligible participants include residential cust omers who purchase electricity or natural gas

directly from MidAmerican. Participants may be eligible for rebates or financing through the

program. MidAmerican markets the program through a trade ally network of HVAC contractors

and other trade allies. All contra ctors selling and installing high-e fficiency equipment are eligible

to participate. Customers must provide proof of purchase and other relevant information.

The lighting component of the Residential Equipment program is marketed through the

Be Bright sales promotion of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) and light-emitting diodes

(LEDs). For the eighth year, MidAmerican, In terstate Power and Light Company (IPL) and

numerous municipal utilities im plemented a joint consumer awar eness campaign and retail sales

promotion of ENERGY STAR qualified lighting. The Be Bright campaign aims to accelerate the

adoption of energy-efficient lighting by Iowa consumers.

# 13 2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric and gas savings for the Residential Equipment program were 76,458,725

kWh and 1,164,080 therms respectively. These figur es are 128 percent of total 2012 planned

electric savings and 75 percent of total 2012 planned gas savings. Total spending for the

Residential Equipment program was $10,887,238, which is 89 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 The following rebates were processed in 2012:

o 5,522 air conditioner rebates, compared to 5,651 in 2011.

o 1,184 heat pump rebates, compared to 1,259 for 2011.

o 3,812 water heater rebates, compared to 4,182 for 2011.

o 75 natural gas boiler rebates, compared to 133 for 2011.

o 8,695 natural gas furnace rebates, compared to 10,777 for 2011.

o 2,344 furnace fan rebates, compared to 3,266 for 2011.

o 36,268 appliance rebates, compared to 42,081 for 2011.

o 1,119 SAVE installation rebates paid to contractors, compared to 312 for 2011.

o 6,052 programmable thermostat rebates; th is measure was reinstated in 2012.

 1,232,158 self-installed CFLs were rebated through the retail lighting campaign,

compared to 943,590 in 2011. LED bulbs were introduced to the lighting campaign in

2012 and 7,196 LED bulbs were rebated. Addi tional campaign highlights included:

o 65 million kWh saved by MidAmerican customers.

o More than 460 retail store locations participated in promotional activities.

o More than 1,000 retail sale s associates received tr aining on the benefits of

replacing incandescent light bulbs with CFLs and LEDs, equipping them to

convey the benefits to their customers.

# 14 o More than 3,500 point-of-sa le signs were posted in stores during the campaign,

which worked to educate consumers and sales associates.

 Scholarships for training con tinued to be offered to c ontractors who successfully

complete the SAVE classes offered around the state. Working through the Midwest

Energy Efficiency Alliance (MEEA), the SAVE initiative was implemented to train

HVAC contractors regarding qua lity installation of high efficiency HVAC equipment

and systems. SAVE activities included:

o 1,119 SAVE installation rebates paid to 13 contractors.

o 849 technicians trained in Iowa since 2010.

o 21 training sessions provided to contractors.

o 48 in-field verifications completed.

o 46 in-person visits with HVAC cont ractors to promote the program.

o One contractor advisory group meeting was held.

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 Persuading trade allies to participate in the voluntary SAVE program option was a

significant program challenge. In the firs t quarter 2013, there has been a notable

increase in participation now that the utilit ies are paying for the cost of the software

instead of the contractors.

 Participation in natural gas measures was lower than the previous year. The natural

gas prices have been steadily lower than previous levels for an extended period of

time. The lower natural gas prices and warm er than average winter weather reduced

consumer concern for energy efficiency a nd contributed to the lower participation

numbers for the natural gas measures.

# 15 Promotion

 The residential equipment program was promoted in February

, May, August, and

November editions of the At Your Service newsletter.

 The CFL campaign was promoted in an Oct ober bill insert and multiple print ads.

 The SAVE initiative was promoted in a December bill insert.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 On-site mentoring and oversigh t will continue to be provide d to SAVE contractors as

MidAmerican prepares to require SAVE installation on all he ating and cooling

installations in 2014.

 MidAmerican will continue to sponsor SAVE training sessions.

 MidAmerican will communicate with custom ers about the benefits of SAVE HVAC

installations through newspaper ad s and other marketing channels.

 Advisory meetings and in-person visits will be conducted with trade allies to promote

SAVE to HVAC contractors.

# 16 Residential Audit

The Residential Audit program encourages comprehensive energy efficiency

improvements in existing homes built befo re December 31, 2001, by providing free on-site

energy audits, installation of free water hea ting and lighting measures and incentives for

insulation and window improvements. HomeCheck ® 

# is the marketing name for this program.

The on-site audit offers unbiased informati on about energy efficiency improvements to

the customer. During the audit, the auditor inst alls low-cost measures, including CFLs, faucet

aerators, low-flow showerheads, a water he ater blanket and hot water pipe insulation.

The auditor recommends insulation if neede d, provides a referral for an insulation

contractor if desired by the cu stomer, and provides weatherization advice and informs customers

of other MidAmerican programs that may help th em save energy. MidAmerican offers rebates or

financing to customers that install the recomm ended insulation. Customers also have the option

of having a programmable thermostat installed for a reasonable co-payment. Finally, customers

are made aware that financi ng for windows is available.

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric and gas savings for the Re sidential Audit program were 4,262,440 kWh and

419,497 therms respectively. These re sults are 91 percent of tota l 2012 planned electric savings

and 55 percent of total 2012 planned gas savi ngs. Total spending for the Residential Audit

program was $4,863,540, which is 90 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 5,492 in-home audits were completed, compared to 5,900 in 2011. Since the

program’s inception, 138,300 residential en ergy audits have been completed.

# 17  11,500 customers accessed the residential online energy audit, compared to 11,939 in

2011.

 8,735 building shell measures were proce ssed, consistent with the 8,732 measures

processed in 2011.

 50,597 direct install low-cost measures we re installed, compared to 53,959 in 2011.

 HomeCheck generated 20 compliments from customers.

 HomeCheck maintained a 4-week or less waiting period during 2012.

 The HPwES pilot offered scholarships for training to contract ors who successfully

complete the Building Performance Institut e certification. HPwES activities included:

o 25 customers were referred to the HPwES pilot through the HomeCheck program.

o 36 initial HPwES audits were completed during 2012.

o Four retrofit jobs were completed and qualified for rebate.

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 There were 500 fewer in-home audits in 2012 compared to 2011, resulting in lower

energy savings. The natural gas prices have been steadily lower than previous levels

for an extended period of time. The lower natural gas prices combined with a warm

winter in 2012 contributed to the lower participation for the natural gas measures.

 Gaining participation in the HPwES pilot ha s proven to be difficult. Despite some

initial enthusiasm, contractors did not in corporate the program into their business

model and did not participate in the pilot as expected.

# 18 Promotion

 HomeCheck was promoted in February

, May, August, and November editions of the

At Your Service newsletter. HomeCheck was also pr omoted as part of the energy

efficiency marketing efforts in radio, print and online advertisements.

 Customers were identified who were eligib le for insulation reba tes and had not yet

applied for a rebate. 11,569 rebate remi nder postcards were mailed to those

customers.

 MidAmerican continued to communicate with insulation trade allies through outreach

efforts.

 HomeCheck was promoted by placing door hangers on neighboring homes after

completing HomeCheck audits.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 MidAmerican will continue the aggressive promotion of HomeCheck in order to

increase the number of aud its and insulation incentives.

# 19 Residential New Construction

The Residential New Construction program pr omotes energy efficiency in new home

construction and educates homebuilders and new homebuyers about the advantages of building

energy-efficient homes. The program encourages bu ilders to consider energy efficiency in the

initial design of new homes and provides leader ship and innovation in Iowa’s residential new

construction industry by promoting a ‘best practic es’ approach to home building. Prior to the

program, builders often did not incl ude key energy efficiency measures in new homes, such as

duct sealing at each joint, f oundation insulation, energy-efficien t mechanical heating, cooling

and water heating equipment, energy-efficient windows and higher levels of ceiling and sidewall

insulation.

A participating builder has three options fo r participation in the program. Either the

builder must complete all of the program requi rements in the Builder Option Package (BOP) or

Advanced Builder Option Package (ABOP) to recei ve the comprehensive rebate, or they may opt

for the ENERGY STAR performance path that requires individual modeling of the home to

ensure energy savings. Each new home that particip ates in the performance path qualifies for an

ENERGY STAR rating as determined by the Environmental Protection Agency. ENERGY

STAR homes are at least 15 per cent more efficient than homes built to the 2006 International

Energy Conservation Code (IECC).

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric and gas savings for the Re sidential New Construction program were

6,810,603 kWh and 959,331 therms respectively. Th ese figures are 105 percent of total 2012

planned electric savings and 112 percent of total 2012 planned ga s savings. Total spending for

# 20 the Residential New Construction program was $5,398,791, which is 71 percent of the 2012

plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 2,538 new single family home rebates we re processed, compared to 2,645 in 2011.

 151 new multi-family home rebates were processed, compared to 173 in 2011.

 Total savings for both electric and gas we re above plan even though spending was

below plan. In 2011, new homes were built to more stringent energy requirements

than ENERGY STAR homes in order to r eceive federal incentives being offered.

Although the federal incentives were elim inated in 2012, builders are continuing to

build above ENERGY STAR requirements, thus resulting in higher than anticipated

energy savings per home in the ENER GY STAR portion of MidAmerican’s

Residential New Home program in 2012.

 MidAmerican continued to reach out to build ers and raters during the year to ensure

program compliance. In order to facilita te a more comprehensive quality assurance

effort, MidAmerican began to require that builders pre-enroll homes in the program

prior to drywall installation.

 The Advanced Building Option Package, a new program that gave builders an

additional option to ENERGY STAR, was intr oduced. This new option incorporated

prescriptive measures, SAVE inst allation, and a Home Energy Rating

System (HERS) score.

# 21 Key Program Challenges in 2012

 There was considerable uncertainty relate d to the rollout of new ENERGY STAR

new home requirements. The transition to the new requirements contributed to some

confusion in the marketplace at the beginning of 2012.

Promotion

 The residential new construction program was promoted in Blueprint Magazine and

various local parade of homes and hom e builder association publications.

 Yard signs promoting the residential new c onstruction program were placed in front

of participating homes.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 MidAmerican will continue to communicate the residential new construction program

requirements to raters and builders, and encourage program participation.

 The program will continue to be promoted through trade journals and home show

advertisements.

# 22 Residential Load Management

SummerSaver SM 

# is MidAmerican’s residential air conditioner load control program. It is

an electric program that operates in all larger and many smaller electric service towns in

MidAmerican’s Iowa service territory.

Central air conditioners and air-source heat pumps in owner-occupied single-family

homes are eligible for the program. A small load control receiver (LCR) is installed on the siding

of the house near the outside disconnect switch and compressor unit of th e customer’s system.

The load control receiver operates by overridi ng the customer’s thermostat. The compressor

reacts to the load control receiver’s control signal by shutting down, in the same fashion as it

shuts down when the thermostat has been sa tisfied. Although the outdoo r compressor shuts down

during the control period, the indoor fan continue s to operate. The circulation provided by the

indoor fan helps to reduce any potential discomfort of cycling, because previously cooled indoor

air continues to circul ate throughout the house.

Operation of LCRs requires radio sign al or pager communication. MidAmerican

maintains leases with FM radio stations in si x markets to communicate with FM-based LCRs.

These markets include Des Moines, Davenport, Carroll, Charles City, Sioux City and Waterloo.

Pager-based LCRs receive signals from a pa ger company in Des Moines, which provides

statewide coverage. MidAmerican uses pager tec hnology for all new installations, even in areas

served by FM transmission towers.

Effective January 1, 2009, all new LCRs in corporate an advanced technology called

TrueCycle ® 

# . TrueCycle LCRs base the cycling time of each individual compressor on historical

run times that are stored in memory, as opposed to previous LCRs that cycle all compressors in

the familiar 15-minutes on and 15-minutes off pa ttern. TrueCycle compensates for oversized

# 23 compressors by cycling them longer each hour th an right-sized or undersized compressors,

improving the kW yield realized during an event.

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric savings for the Residential Load Management program were 72,532 kW of

system peak demand, which is 138 percent of total 2012 planned electric kW savings.

Additionally, the program contributed savings of 2,098,033 kWh, which is 242 percent of total

planned kWh savings. Total spending for the Residential Load Management program was

$4,348,263, which is 103 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 60,572 customers participated in the SummerSaver program.

 62,860 LCRs were utilized.

 5,426 aged LCRs were replaced, compared to the 2012 goal of 5,000.

 1,143 new LCRs were installed for customers entering the program.

 13 cycling events were successfully conducte d on the following dates: June 27,

June 28, July 3, July 5, July 6, July 16, July 17, July 18, July 23, July 24, July 25,

August 3 and August 30. The event on June 27 was limited to the

Des Moines/Oskaloosa Operating Center.

 Cycling events were managed throughout th e summer at the direc tion of the Midwest

Independent Transmission System Operat or (MISO) or Mi dAmerican’s Energy

Supply Management Department.

# 24 Key Program Challenges in 2012

 The number of customers dropping out of the program was higher at 1,138, compared

to 620 in 2011. This resulted in the program r ealizing a net gain of 5 new participants,

which was short of the 2012 net gain goa l of 772. The increased number of dropouts

was the result of having two consecutive summers with a high number of cycling

events; 11 cycling events in 2011 and 13 cy cling events in 2012. In 2010, there was

only one cycling event and 348 customers left the program.

Promotion

 Solicitation brochures were sent to eligible customers in February 2012.

 The program was promoted to customers who moved using Welcome Home and

Welcome Back cards. Welcome Home cards are sent to customers that move into a

home that already has an LCR instal led. The card offers the new homeowner

automatic enrollment in the program. Welcome Back cards are sent to customers that

previously were part of the program and moved to a new home that does not have an

LCR. The card reminds the customer of th e benefits of the program and encourages

them to rejoin the program.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 MidAmerican plans to replace 5,000 aged LCRs.

 New participants will be solicited in orde r to meet the 2013 net gain goal of 779.

# 25 Critical Peak Pricing Pilot Program

The Critical-Peak Pricing (CPP) Pilot is designe d to test the key features of new demand

response strategies in MidAmerican’s service terr itory. The CPP Pilot is designed to be offered

to electric residential customers in a limited geographical area, and rely on a mix of education,

pricing and technology strategies to help cu stomers better manage electrical usage.

Goals

The goals of the CPP Pilot outlined in the plan are to:

 Gather experience and insight into the capability and maturity of MidAmerican’s

current automated meter reading system.

 Gain an understanding of customer intere st in, and response to, time-based rates.

 Reduce MidAmerican’s critical-peak demand.

 Help customers conserve energy and ultimately save money.

 Receive customer input on Smart Grid technologies.

 Test technologies for possible fu ture broad-scale deployment.

 Explore network and data security issues that accompany advanced deployments.

 Gain a better understanding of an appropriate deployment schedule.

Program Changes

At an October 2010 meeting, staff member s from the IUB and OCA agreed with

MidAmerican’s proposal to delay the pilot implem entation in order to ta ke advantage of the

results of numerous pilots taking place acro ss the United States, as well as significant

advancements in technology options. The delay al so provided additional time to examine and

consider the relevant work being done with resp ect to adoption of interoperability standards,

# 26 customer acceptance and consumer privacy protec tions. MidAmerican agreed to monitor these

deployments and pilots, and provide regular updat es to the IUB and OCA to see if there is a

reason to meet or change direc tion. MidAmerican also agreed to keep the staffs of the IUB and

OCA posted with information of interest for poten tial future Smart Grid developments in Iowa.

In the meantime, MidAmerican will continue to monitor the smart meter deployments

and Smart Grid pilots for information of interest to potential future developments. MidAmerican

will also continue investigating meter data mana gement software options for both pilot and widescale deployments.

Key Program Activities in 2012

 Smart meter deployments, pricing implem entations, technology developments, and

Smart Grid pilots contin ued to be monitored.

 The Illinois Smart Grid Collaborative concl uded with the enactment of a new Smart

Grid law in Illinois. The law was la ter challenged by the Illinois Commerce

Commission in a docketed proceeding in which Commonwealth Edison Company

was only granting partial relief on a ra te request to fund the Smart Grid

improvements.

 While MidAmerican determined that there wasn’t a need at this time to implement a

meter data management system, upgrades to the bill processing software that will

accommodate interval AMR meter data fo r a limited number of meters were

purchased and will be deployed in May 2013.

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 Delays were experienced with numerous Smar t Grid deployments due to an increase

in utility commissions requiring utilities to offer an opt-out option for customers who

# 27 do not want a smart meter, with some of the commissions pushing for the opt-out to

come at no cost to the customer. Customers have complained that the smart meters

have actually raised their bills, compromi sed privacy and added health risks due to

being exposed to additional electro-magnetic fields.

 Progress on the development of an effectiv e Smart Grid framework for data-exchange

standards for electricity usage was hampered by the national shift in interest to the

development of cyber security standards.

 Utilities continued to show hesitance toward spending capital on Smart Grid

deployments, with no large-scale smart meter deployments announced in 2012, as

utility commissions have been reluctant to allow full recovery of Smart Grid costs in

recent decisions. One of the main concerns expressed in recent commission decisions

was that the benefits of the Smart Grid improvements have yet to materialize as

promised.

 The continued development and introduction of new meter data management software

options for both pilot and wide-scale de ployments contributed to MidAmerican’s

decision to not move forward with such a software deployment at this time.

Promotion

 Due to the agreed-upon delay in implem enting the pilot, promotion was not

necessary.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 Monitoring of smart meter deployments , pricing implementation, technology

development, and Smart Grid pilots will con tinue. MidAmerican also will continue to

monitor the development and adoption of federal rules and standards on

# 28 interoperability and cyber security.

 MidAmerican will continue working with industry groups and commissions on Smart

Grid issues.

 Relevant information on Smart Grid devel opments and deployments will be shared

with the IUB and OCA.

 MidAmerican will monitor the Illinois Co mmerce Commission workshops regarding

the design and deployment of peak-time rebates for Commonwea lth Edison Company

and AmerenIllinois.

# 29 Nonresidential Equipment

The Nonresidential Equipment program promot es the purchase of individual pieces of

prescribed high-efficiency equipment by commerc ial and industrial cust omers in both existing

and new facilities. The program addresses the replacement and first-time purchase markets for all

measures and primarily the retrofit market for lightin g. Participation is larg ely dealer-driven; that

is, equipment dealers promote energy-efficient me asures when customers are in the market to

buy new or replacement equipment. The program offers rebates for a wide range of lighting,

heating, ventilation, air conditioning, motors and variable-speed driv es, commercial kitchen

equipment, and insulation measures.

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric and gas savings for the Nonresidential Equipment program were

50,538,350 kWh and 114,960 therms respectively. Th ese figures are 55 pe rcent of total 2012

planned electric savings and 52 pe rcent of total 2012 planned gas savings. Total spending for the

Nonresidential Equipment program was $3,909,535, which is 91 percent of the 2012 plan.

Program Activities in 2012

 90,991 lighting measures were rebated, compared to 79,047 in 2011, accounting for

50% of the program kWh savings in 2012.

 463 variable-speed drives were rebated, compared to 206 in 2011, accounting for 46

percent of the total kWh savings in the program. When it was noted that

nonresidential equipment savings data was lagging at the end of the second quarter

2011, the variable-speed dr ive incentive was increased from $30 to $50 per

horsepower of the driven mo tor. This higher incentive was in place for all of 2012,

helping to increase participation.

# 30  61 motors came through the Money for Motors program and 24 new motors earned a

rebate, compared to 132 in 2011. MidAme rican developed the Money for Motors

initiative to increase opportunities for cu stomers to accomplish motor upgrades. The

initiative emphasizes retrofitting existing, working inefficient motors built before

November 2007 with NEMA Premium motors or efficient motors above NEMA

Premium. The kickoff date for the Money for Motors program wa s

September 15, 2011, and the expiration date for the program is December 31, 2013.

In December 2010, NEMA Premium became the code-based motor. As a result, only

totally enclosed fan-cooled motors and open drip-proof motors that exceed the

NEMA premium efficiency level by one band as identified by the Consortium for

Energy Efficiency (CEE) continue to be elig ible for rebates. Explosion proof/severe

duty motors that meet the NEMA premium efficiency level are also eligible for

rebates. As of January 2013, there are only about 630 motors identified by CEE that

are more efficient than NEMA Premium. In centive features of the Money for Motors

program include:

o A bounty is paid to a customer w ho removes an inefficient motor.

o An additional incentive is paid to the customer if the new motor meets the higher

efficiency above NEMA Premium and qua lifies for MidAmerican’s prescriptive

motor program.

o An incentive is paid to the motor distributor to destroy and environmentally

recycle the old motor.

o The salesperson handling the transaction may receive an incentive.

# 31 Key Program Challenges in 2012

 Rapidly changing technology continued to be a challenge. Advancements in Solid

State Lighting (SSL) are a good example. Fixture performance is rapidly improving

as materials become less expensive. MidA merican reviewed a si gnificant number of

SSL projects in the Custom System s program during 2011. As a result of

MidAmerican’s annual equipment review, LE D low- and high-bay, parking garage,

canopy fixtures and LED replacement lamp s for recessed can applications were

moved from the Custom program to th e prescriptive lighting program for 2012.

However, many of the products had to be ENERGY STAR-qualified or listed by

the Lighting Facts website to be eligible for a rebate. Issues were found with new

manufacturers and/or new products not being certified by either ENERGY STAR

or Lighting Facts, and this resulted in some operational issues for the program.

Other specialty LED units were still review ed in the Custom program As there are no

current national standards for SSL, MidAmerican tried to focus on product

performance data to assist customers in product selection. The Illuminating

Engineering Society of North American (I ESNA) has developed test procedures

LM-79 for LED product performance and LM- 80 for longevity. The test procedures

do not ensure product quality, but do provide pote ntial buyers with unbiased product

photometry. MidAmerican required LM-79 te sting for an LED pr oduct to qualify for

an incentive.

 Efficient electric motor participation conti nued to be a challenge due to the provisions

of the Energy Independence and Secu rity Act (EISA) of 2007. Many motor

distributors only stoc ked and promoted the new code NEMA Premium units and not

the available motors one NEMA band above NEMA Premium. The market continued

# 32 to be slow to migrate to these more efficient motors. MidAmerican’s Money for

Motors program was introduced to provide greater incentives for customers and

motors dealers to remove motors built be fore November 24, 1997, that are still in

service. While 61 motors were removed from service due to the motor bounty in

2012, only 24 new motors earned a rebate, compared to 132 in 2011. The Money for

Motor program expires at the end of 2013 and will not be included in MidAmerican’s

new energy efficiency plan f iling for the next 5 years.

Promotion

 MidAmerican participated in various trade shows and other events for end users that

are sponsored by industry and trade associations. During November 2012,

MidAmerican communicated program change s for 2013 at its trade ally kick-off

meetings.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 Work will continue on improvements that came from an assessment of industrial

potential that was completed in November 2010 as part of the Industrial Savings

Potential Pilot. Opportunities identified to increase electric and natural gas energy

savings include additional promotion of lig hting equipment/systems, high efficiency

motors, adjustable (variable) speed drives, refrigeration systems, control systems

including control of electric and natura l gas heating, cooling and ventilation

equipment/system components, and process improvements including both electric and

natural gas equipment/system components. MidAmerican’s energy efficiency

resources, including program implementation co ntractors, will continue to work with

the key account management group and trade a llies to develop more effective ways to

# 33 communicate the benefits of making effici ency improvements in the areas described

above and increase customer awareness of MidAmerican’s program opportunities to

make efficiency upgrades.

 Incentive/rebate levels for each category of equipment/systems will be reviewed

regularly to determine how much of the incremental cost is covered by

MidAmerican’s current incentives and rebate s. Based on the review of incremental

costs, incentive levels may be adjusted to encourage greater customer participation.

 MidAmerican will continue working with the Consortium for Energy Efficiency

(CEE), including the Commercial Kitchen E quipment, Motors and Motor Systems,

Water & Waste Water, Lighting, Distri bution Transformers, HVAC and Water

Heating committees, to stay informed rega rding changing equipment specifications

and technical updates from CEE and ENERGY STAR.

 Monitoring of technologies reviewed through the Custom program will be continued

to see if they could/should be moved to the Nonresidential Equipment program.

 MidAmerican will work with trade allies to identify ways to increase customer

awareness of and participation in th e program. MidAmerican will continue

conducting trade ally events promoting pr ogram awareness and networking with

contractors.

# 34 Nonresidential Custom

The Nonresidential Custom pr ogram, marketed as the Custom Systems program, provides

a delivery channel for non-standard energy-savi ng projects. The Nonresid ential Custom program

offers financial incentives to customers inst alling equipment or systems not covered by a

prescriptive rebate in the Nonresidential E quipment program. The Nonresidential Custom

program also is available to customers with more complex energy needs that cannot be

accommodated through the Small Commercial Audit program. The program is delivered through

the assistance of a program implementation contractor, A-TEC, and its subcontractor, The

Energy Group.

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric and gas savings for the Nonresidential Custom program were 11,932,710

kWh and 251,474 therms respectively. These figur es are 152 percent of total 2012 planned

electric savings and 228 percent of total 2012 planned gas savings. Total spending for the

Nonresidential Custom program was $2,420,955, wh ich is 148 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 Targeted promotion on key project types he lped achieve greater energy savings and

was well received by mechanical, controls a nd lighting contractors. Electric and gas

savings both exceeded goal for 2012.

 70 percent of electric savings resulted from assorted lighting measures such as LED

lighting, lighting redesign, reduced wattage lamps, induction lighting and CFL

lighting.

 63 percent of gas savings resulted fro m targeted energy management systems

(specifically with demand-c ontrolled ventilation opport unities), total HVAC system

# 35 redesigns, and boiler plant improvements designed to increase gas savings.

 6 percent of electric savings resulted from HVAC systems.

 6 percent of electric savings result ed from heat recovery systems.

 5 percent of electric savings result ed from compressed air systems.

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 Continued development of new LED produc ts was challenging. While several LED

products were added to the prescripti ve program in 2012, additional products

continued to be developed that are not on MidAmerican’s prescriptive list.

Additionally:

o There has been continued growth in the number of contractors submitting

projects.

o Due to the volume of LED projects, additional measures may be incorporated into

the prescriptive program for 2013.

 Obtaining complete product information from contractors and customers submitting

applications for project pre-approva l continued to be a challenge.

Promotion

 Key trade allies were visited and encouraged to consider the Custom program when

making customer presentations and project bid proposals.

 Specific program materials were developed and distributed to mechanical, electrical

and controls contractor s and engineering firms across the state.

 A presentation was made and informati on booths were staffed at professional

associations and trade groups, such as a nnual meetings of facility managers for

hospitals and schools and c ontractors events, to improve awareness of the

# 36 nonresidential programs and othe r energy efficiency options.

 Monthly emails were sent and frequent telephone calls were made to mechanical,

controls and electrical contractors re minding trade allies of the program and

guidelines and seeking new projects.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 MidAmerican will work with contractors a nd customers to provide education on how

the program may assist them in reducing th e total cost of futu re projects and reduce

total energy costs at their facilities.

 The emphasis on promoting key project type s with significant potential for energy

savings will be continued.

# 37 Nonresidential Efficiency Bid ® 

# Program

MidAmerican’s Efficiency Bid program uses elements of competition and potential for

high rewards to enhance customer interest. Trad itional efficiency programs are utility-driven,

specifying eligible measures and available incent ives. Efficiency Bid is customer-driven, with

customers defining their own ener gy-efficiency projects based on their unique circumstances and

bidding competitively for program incentives wi thin broad program guidelines. MidAmerican

encourages customers to think holistically, re garding energy systems, to develop projects

designed to optimize system energy use, inst ead of considering onl y the energy usage of

individual pieces of equipment.

Customers propose projects and bid for incentiv es based on the level of energy efficiency

achieved by the project. Customers’ bids detail wh at projects they would implement, estimate the

energy and demand reductions the proj ects will yield and define th e incentives required to justify

additional capital investment. Customers comp ete for energy-efficiency incentives, which

MidAmerican awards based on an evaluation of each bid.

Efficiency Bid is structured on a risk-reward basis as submitted projects are compared to

others in that bidding cycle. F unding may or may not be awarded during that particular bid cycle

if a customer’s project is ra nked below other bid projects. E fficiency Bid participants are

guaranteed a 50 percent payment of the requested funding at the time of installation. Payment of

the remaining 50 percent is based on performa nce. A bonus of 25 percent of the requested

funding may be granted, subject to measurement a nd verification of energy savings, when energy

savings exceed the project initi al energy savings estimates.

# 38 2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

No bids were received, resulting in no electric or gas savi ngs achieved for the

Nonresidential Efficiency Bid program in 2012. To tal spending for the Nonresidential Efficiency

Bid program was $9,434 which is 1 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 MidAmerican successfully completed four bidding cycles; however no bids were

received.

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 Many customers have told MidAmerican that they took advantage of the Efficiency

Partners track of the Nonresidential Energy An alysis program in lieu of using the

Efficiency Bid program. The comprehensive approach to energy saving projects in

the Efficiency Partners program coupled with enhanced incentives has proven to be

very popular among the eligible 1 MW industrial customers.

Promotion

 Printed program materials, emails and the energy efficiency website were used to

communicate information about the quarterly requests for proposals. This information

was distributed quarterly to approximately 124 bid eligib le industrial customers.

Requests for project propos als were sent both electr onically and by U.S. mail.

 Nexant, MidAmerican’s program implementa tion contractor for the Nonresidential

Energy Analysis program/ Efficiency Partners track and the Efficiency Bid program,

screened customer inquiries to determine th e appropriate program for customers. If a

customer was interested in pursuing effi ciency improvements but not ready for the

# 39 comprehensive approach followed in the Efficiency Partners program, Nexant

discussed the potential benef its of the Efficiency Bid program with the customer.

 MidAmerican’s key account managers he lped key account customers determine

which nonresidential energy effi ciency program best suited the needs of the customer.

Efficiency Bid was included in this suite of program offerings.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 Requests for proposals will be issued to Effi ciency Bid eligible industrial customers

on a quarterly basis (January, April, July and October).

# 40 Small Commercial Energy Audit

The Small Commercial Energy Audit program provides comprehensive services to small

business customers, including energy audits, inst allation of energy-saving measures during the

audits, and recommendations and financial in centives to help customers implement energysaving projects. The program targets small build ing owners, property managers and tenants and

is marketed under the name BusinessCheck.

The program is delivered through the assistan ce of a program implementation contractor,

Franklin Energy Services, to primarily target inefficient lighting and insulation in existing

buildings. During the audit, the auditor installs low-cost, energy-saving measures, such as CFLs,

LED exit sign retrofit kits, faucet aerators, lo w-flow shower heads, wa ter pipe insulation and

refrigerated vending machine controls.

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric and gas savings for the Small Commercial Audit program were 9,041,346

kWh and 111,248 therms respectively. These figur es are 247 percent of total 2012 planned

electric savings and 96 percent of total 2012 pl anned gas savings. Total spending for the Small

Commercial Audit program was $2,382,500, whic h is 116 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 Electric savings exceeded goal by 147 percent.

 2,189 electric and gas audits were completed; demand for audits continued to be high.

 12,281 direct install electric saving measures were installed as a part of the audits,

accounting for approximately 16 percent of total electric savings. Compact

fluorescent light bulbs and refrigerated ve nding machines provided the majority of

the savings.

# 41  2,055 direct install natural gas saving measures were installed as a part of the audits,

accounting for approximately three per cent of total natural gas savings.

Programmable thermostats and faucet aerato rs provided the majority of the savings.

 73 percent of the total electric savings resulted from follow-up lighting measures,

demonstrating the success of the lig hting contractor referral process.

 38 percent of natural gas savings resulted from HVAC measures.

 46 percent of natural gas savings re sulted from building shell measures.

 Ongoing customer satisfaction surveys of pr ogram participants were developed and

implemented to learn more about perceptions of the energy audit process, value and

acceptance of direct installed measures in small commercial businesses during the

audit, and general conduct of the audit and energy advisors.

 Strong participation from small communities, such as Le Mars, Missouri Valley,

Rock Valley and Sac City, continued, incl uding participation fr om both private and

public facilities.

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 The continuously evolving LED market pos ed challenges for the program and for

customers. While the new LED product offe rings were welcome, the increase in

available technologies made it difficult for small commercial customers to understand

which products would qualify fo r a prescriptive incentive.

Promotion

 In addition to general promotion thr ough television and radio, the program was

specifically promoted in a number of ways:

o Articles in MidAmerican’s customer newsletters, At Your Service ;

# 42 o Presentations to business and service groups and trade associations, school

sporting events, the annual Iowa St ate Fair and other venues; and

o General program information availa ble through MidAmerican’s toll free

BusinessAdvantage call center; inquiries for more technical information were

directed to a dedicated toll-free call center.

 Eight lighting contractors actively participat ed in the referral program, accounting for

approximately one third of the lighting projects.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 More rigorous follow-up with participants will be conducted after the audit is

completed to assist with implementa tion of cost-effective recommendations.

 Target marketing to small commercial sect ors such as convenience stores, restaurants

and lodging facilities will be conducted.

# 43 Nonresidential Energy Analysis Program

The Nonresidential Energy Analysis program helps participating cu stomers identify and

pursue energy management and energy efficiency improvements in existing facilities including

large commercial, governmental and institutional buildings, industrial facilities, and

manufacturing processes. A comprehensive whol e-facility approach helps customers save

energy, reduce peak demand, reduce operating cost s, and achieve high performance facilities.

The program is delivered through the assistan ce of a program implementation contractor,

Nexant, who provides customers with whole-faci lity assessments, organizational and technical

assistance, project management and projec t completion verification when necessary.

The Nonresidential Energy Analysis program o ffers customers a wide range of services

beyond incentives. These services include:

 Walk-through energy assessments – Participants receive a scoping-level facility

assessment to summarize existing equipment and systems to help manage energy

issues and usage to make informed capital decisions.

 Organizational and technical assistance – Pa rticipants may receive recommendations

on energy management best practices and inde pendent technical assistance to identify

and evaluate energy-saving opportuniti es in their buildings/facilities.

 Detailed studies – Participants needing an investment-grade energy assessment that

goes beyond the scope of the facility wa lk-through energy assessment may submit a

scope of work for co-funding considerat ion, e.g. a compressed air or a retrocommissioning study of a building.

 EfficiencyPartners ® 

# – Participants are encouraged to pursue the EfficiencyPartners

track of the program. As the name suggests, customers enter into a partnership with

# 44 MidAmerican to develop an energy effici ency action plan to pursue continuous

energy improvement within their faci lities. The plan outlines a project

implementation process, identifies energy management goals and training

opportunities, project impacts, eligible incentives and ta rget implementation dates.

Participating customers receive enhanced incentives for implementing multiple

measures in their comprehensive action plan.

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric and gas savings for the N onresidential Energy Analysis program were

29,115,617 kWh and 222,761 therms respectively. Thes e figures are 86 percent of total 2012

planned electric savings and 227 percent of total 2012 planned ga s savings. Total spending for

the Nonresidential Energy Analysis program was $6,206,396, which is 171 percent of the 2012

plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 Electric program savings for 2009-2012 totaled 119,937,827 kWh, or 94 percent of

the target for the first four years of the plan.

 The program continued to experience higher than anticipated de mand for natural gas

programs and savings exceeded goal; this is primarily due to low plan assumptions

regarding participation a nd per project savings.

 Overall demand for program services was strong in 2012:

o 71 energy assessments were conducted, co mpared to a plan participation

assumption of 30.

# 45 o Customers installed 592 proj ects through the Nonresid ential Energy Analysis

program, far exceeding the plan participation assumptions.

 566 of these projects resulted in elect ric savings, compared to a plan

participation assumption of 114.

 39 of these projects resu lted in natural gas savings, compared to a plan

participation assumption of 28.

 64 new facilities were enrolled into the EfficiencyPartners track of the Nonresidential

Energy Analysis program, committing to implement 411 energy-saving opportunities

with estimated annual energy savings of 37 million kWh and 790,000 therms.

 MidAmerican’s internal task force continue d work to further streamline the program

process and increase customer satisfacti on with the program; 2012 efforts included:

o More clearly communicating the types a nd amount of information required to

enroll projects in the program.

o Developing a “leave-behind” one-page program overview to assist key account

managers in educating new EfficiencyPartners participants about the benefits of

the program, the program process, and what is expected of them.

o Improving the walk-through energy assessm ent report to make it easier to

understand and better communi cate the benefits of implementing potential energy

efficiency improvements.

o Having key account managers continue to track projects with the highest amount

of preapproved energy savings expected to be installed in 2012; identifying and

removing completion barriers when possible.

o Addressing project completion barriers by launching a pilot that helps companies

and vendors through the program process.

# 46 o Working to develop a partnership with Io wa Energy Bank in an effort to assist

public facilities with lo w-cost financing options.

o Developing a new memorandum of unde rstanding and customer handbook to

replace the Energy Efficiency Action Plan with a more customer-friendly,

effective enrollment package.

o Redesigning the program brochure for 2013 to more clearly communicate the

value of the program and increase readability.

o Developing a new internal monthly report format and a forecasting tool, powered

by historical data and trends.

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 Spending continued to be above goal. In 2012, the program experienced a high

demand for program services, which result ed in the quantity of both completed

energy assessments and projects to exceed budget amounts.

 Despite high demand for program services, electric savings continued to be lower

than plan due to lower than pla nned average savings per project.

 High demand for program services by natural gas customers resulted in savings

exceeding goal; however, the quantity of comp leted projects resulted in the program

exceeding planned budgets and goals.

 The increased number of assessments resulted in increased costs for the program

year, while associated savings impacts wi ll be recorded in future years.

# 47 Promotion

 The program was primarily promoted through MidAmerican’s network of key

account managers who personally:

o Informed customers of the benefits of energy efficiency;

o Delivered and explained energy efficiency materials to customers and explained

annual program changes;

o Determined the appropriate energy efficien cy program to meet customer needs;

and

o Assisted customers through the program process, including program application,

energy assessment, energy efficiency ac tion plan, project implementation and

incentives stages.

 The program was further promoted through:

o Conducting trade ally kickoff meetings at locations across Mi dAmerican’s service

territory to explain new ch anges to the program, descri be new program offerings

and answer program questions;

o Developing and distributing annual program materials to key trade allies; and

o Involving the program contra ctor in meetings between customers and the key

account manager, when appropriate, to he lp encourage participation and ensure

customer understanding of the program.

 As a continuation of the Industrial Savings Potential Pilot, th ree market segment

overviews and a compressed air fact sheet were developed to better communicate the

value of and potential for energy efficiency to a few of Iowa’s key industrial market

segments, including food proces sing, machinery and plastics.

# 48 Key Activities Planned in 2013

 Efforts to streamline the program process wi ll continue, in an effort to increase

customer satisfaction and enc ourage program participation.

 Key account managers will continue to track projects with the highest amount of

preapproved energy savings expected to be installed in 2013, and identify and remove

completion barriers when possible.

 Training of key account managers will conti nue to ensure understanding of program

requirements and the resources available to th em to help remove barriers to customer

participation.

 MidAmerican will develop a strategy to tran sition participating customers to the new

energy efficiency plan once approved.

# 49 Commercial New Construction Program

The Commercial New Construc tion program promotes the design and construction of

high-efficiency commercial buildings, includi ng new building construction as well as major

renovations of existing buildings. The objective of the program is to work in partnership with

developers, architects, engineeri ng firms and equipment contractors, and help influence projects

during the design phase. Energy de sign assistance and constructi on incentives are offered to

reduce market barriers to incorporating energy ef ficiency in constructi on projects. The program

is delivered through the assistance of a progr am implementation contractor, The Weidt Group,

who provides energy design assistance, project ma nagement and project completion verification.

The program offers energy design services through fi ve program tracks, tailored to the needs of

different markets. The five tracks include:

 Track I – targets several building types up to 15,0 00 square feet that can be served

effectively through an online energy modeling and decision-making tool.

 Track II – targets projects larger than 15,000 square feet interested in pursuing more

standard energy effici ency strategies.

 Track III – targets projects larger than 15,000 s quare feet interested in pursuing

customized energy efficiency strategies.

 Track IV – targets projects interested in pursuing advanced energy efficiency

strategies; supports strategies required fo r Leadership in Energy and Environmental

Design (LEED ® 

# ) – Optimize Energy Performance or ENERGY STAR.

 Track V – Ongoing Performance Track, to be offered on a pilot basis for those

interested in additional technical and financial as sistance for meeting ongoing

performance metrics after construction a nd final verification has been completed.

# 50 2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric and gas savings for the Co mmercial New Construction program were

26,136,906 kWh and 451,668 therms respectively. Thes e figures are 52 percent of total 2012

planned electric savings and 55 percent of tota l 2012 planned gas savings. Total spending for the

program was $9,550,292, which is 106 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Success in 2012

 81 projects were completed, of which 42 we re large building projects and 39 were

small building projects.

 71 new projects were started, of which 37 were large buildi ng projects, over 50,000

square feet, and 34 were small building proj ects. The number of new projects in the

program leveled off in 2012:

o 2012 – 71 new projects

o 2011 – 84 new projects

o 2010 – 83 new projects

o 2009 – 74 new projects

o 2008 – 78 new projects

 Despite the leveling off of new project starts , the total square footage and the average

size of projects started in creased over previous years. In 2012, the average was

83,000 square feet per building for a total of 5.9 million square feet. In 2011, average

building size was 66,700 square feet for a to tal of 5.4 million square feet enrolled.

 The education sector continue d to show support for the program. Forty-three percent

of the projects completed were K-12 or higher education related buildings.

# 51  An Iowa-based convenience store completed fi ve new construction projects as part of

a volume building program, with additional stores planned.

 Several notable projects were completed with electric sa vings significantly above the

baseline, including a large hall and events cen ter, a prominent data center, a research

facility, a transit unit hub, and a shelter.

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 Electric and gas savings conti nued to be lower than plan. Fewer than anticipated large

building projects were enrolled and comple ted. Smaller buildings were constructed

and less intensive renovation and addition projects were enrolled and completed,

leading to lower ener gy savings opportunities.

 Since the average size of a completed buildi ng continued to be smaller than planned,

there was less potential for savings.

o 2012 – 81 projects received construction incen tives for an average building size of

74,000 square feet.

o 2011 – 67 projects received construction incen tives for an average building size of

66,700 square feet.

o 2010 – 38 projects received construction incen tives for an average building size of

116,000 square feet.

 While savings were lower than plan, spendi ng was six percent above goal. Costs were

incurred to begin participation of new cu stomers in the pipeline and complete the

verification process. The program pipelin e averages two to three years for a

participant to complete the Commercial New Construction process through the design

and construction of their building.

# 52  15 projects started in 2007 through 2011 were in an on hold status at the end of 2012.

Many of these projects would have normally been completed in 2012 and could have

added 1.3 million square feet of completed project space for an estimated 6–7 GWh

of savings toward meeting the 2012 energy savings goals for the year.

 Some FEMA-funded projects resulting from flood recovery efforts seemed to be

slowed and/or downsized due to delays a nd changes in approvals. Funding in general

was one of the drivers in determining th e ultimate size of a bui lding and the design

and construction schedules.

Promotion

 A program advertisement was included in an American Institute of

Architects Iowa insert that appeared in newspapers across Iowa in the spring.

 A joint-utility advertising effort was coordi nated, with Alliant Energy and Black Hills

Energy, for two magazine articles and advertisements in ia architect

.

 Schools were reached out to by having a joint-utility booth, with Alliant Energy and

Black Hills Energy, at their first annual green schools conference in April 2012.

 Architects were reached out to by having a joint-utility booth, with Alliant Energy

and Black Hills Energy, at the 2012 Iowa American Institute of Architects

Convention in Des Moines, Iowa. Recipi ents of the 2012 Excellence in Energy

Efficient Design Award were recognized fo r their outstanding efforts in reducing

energy use through joint-utility Comm ercial New Construction activities.

 Lunch and learn sessions were conducted with architecture and engineering firms;

these sessions were approved for one Continuing Education Unit for LEED®

Accredited Professionals.

# 53  The program was highlighted at the Iowa Association for Energy Efficiency Iowa

Energy Summit, where owner representative s discussed setting high sustainability

goals and a presentation was given rega rding zero emissions building design.

 MidAmerican participated in the US Gr een Building Council Iowa Chapter Green

Schools Bus Tour to highlight program savings and strategies, and encourage

program participation.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 MidAmerican will place a major focus on track ing construction completion status and

verifying the completion of over 83 buildi ngs that have expected construction

completion dates in 2013.

 MidAmerican will continue to get new pr ojects into the project pipeline through

Introduction to Commercial New Constructi on lunch and learn programs, phone calls

to design team firms, monitoring news and construction services, advertising,

customer and trade event participation, presentations and customer and industry

events, and key account manager identification of projects.

 MidAmerican will participate in the thir d annual Excellence in Energy Efficiency

Awards planned for 2013. Awards will be announced in conjunction with the 2013

AIA Iowa Convention in September 2013.

 Training will be provided to key account mana gers to assist them in identifying viable

Commercial New Construction projects and assist them in guiding customers to the

best program option.

# 54  Work will continue on making Track IV a st rong component of the program, due to

its focus on pursuing advanced energy effi ciency strategies. With energy code

changes on the horizon, the services offered through this track will assist owners in

attaining savings goals.

 The Ongoing Performance Track will be m oved from a pilot effort to a standard

program offering.

# 55 Nonresidential Load Management

The Nonresidential Load Management progr am provides large nonresidential customers

with financial incentives to reduce electricity use during MidA merican’s system peak hours.

Customers contract to reduce demand by at le ast 250 kilowatts when signaled to do so by

MidAmerican, by shedding load completely with out replacement, shifting load to nonpeak

periods, and/or generating power on-site to re place the curtailed power. Nonresidential Load

Management is a mature program, as MidAmeri can and its predecessor companies have offered

it for many years, and most participants have been involved for multiple years.

Guidelines and requirements for participati on are provided in tariffs specifying notice

requirements, number of curtailment events and other program procedures. During 2012,

curtailment requests were limited by tariff to a maximum of 16 per season (June through

September) with a maximum duration of six hours pe r event. Participants were offered either

one-year or three-year contracts. New participan ts were limited to signi ng one-year contracts in

order to confirm their ability to perform as required in this mandatory program. Returning

participants who have performed as required in prior years may have been offered the option of a

three-year contract with a higher incentive per kilowatt interrupted.

MidAmerican provides information to custom ers regarding curtailments, curtailment

strategies and analysis of load data via key accoun t managers and a website. Participants also are

offered the use of MidAmerican’s Curtailment Ma nager, an internet-bas ed application that

provides notice of curtailment events, allows mo nitoring of performance in near-real time, and

includes access to data and energy analysis m odules on a year-round basis to help customers

actively manage energy use. Each participant’s performance is evaluated at the end of the

curtailment season.

# 56 2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric savings for the Nonresid ential Load Management program were 205,037

kW of system peak demand. This figure is 114 percent of total 2012 pl anned peak demand kW

savings. Total spending for the Nonresiden tial Load Management program was $8,324,380,

which is 80 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 149 customers participated in the program.

 Two new contracts were si gned, accounting for 2,400 kW of curtailable load.

 49 contracts were renewed, accounting fo r 74,210 kW of curtailable load, a net

decrease of 255 kW from 2011.

 Six contracts were either terminated or not renewed, accounting for a reduction of

28,825 kW of curtailable load.

 Six contracts were amended for the purpose of changing contract curtailment load and

to include acknowledgement of new contract terms per the revised tariff Rider CS,

accounting for a net decrease of 645 kW of curtailable load.

 An extremely hot summer required a total of 13 curtailment events; customers were

broken into three similarly sized groups, each of which was called to interrupt seven

times on a rotating basis. All 13 events were triggered by provision ‘c’ of the tariff

(weighted average temperature across the se rvice territory was forecast to exceed 94

degrees Fahrenheit).

 Pursuant to MISO requirements, results of generator curtailments were submitted to

MISO as required for accreditation of th e curtailable load as load management

resources.

# 57  The overall realization rate, actual vers us contracted curt ailable load, was 95.9

percent.

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 The number of curtailment events required by the higher-than-normal temperatures

resulted in significant customer dissatis faction with the program. As a result,

MidAmerican is reviewing potential changes to its curtailment tariff.

 MISO did not require MidAmerican to call any curtailment events in 2012.

Promotion

 Key account managers met one-on-on e with prospective customers.

 A program brochure was distributed that clearly explains the program, customer

requirements, financial incentives and progr am compliance; case studies of successful

curtailment strategies used by existing cu stomers and a program-specific Web page

were also used to help promote the program.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 Curtailment tariff changes will be submitted to the IUB and OCA, which will modify

the conditions under which MidAmerican will initiate curtailment events.

# 58 Appliance Recycling

The Appliance Recycling program encourages customers to stop using old, inefficient

refrigerators, freezers and room air conditioners and helps them dispose of the old units in an

environmentally responsible manne r. The program primarily targets residential customers, but

is available to all of MidAmerican’s Iowa electr ic customers. The program provides rebates to

customers participating in the program and provi des free pick up and disposal of old working

appliances. To be eligible for program services and rebates, a ppliances must be working and

refrigerators and freezers must be at least 10 cubic feet in size.

MidAmerican implements this program thro ugh a third-party contractor specializing

in recycling appliances. Key steps in program participation include:

 Verifying customers receive MidAmerican electric service and that appliances

meet program requirements;

 Scheduling and executing appliance collection;

 Transporting appliances to a recycling facility;

 Recycling applicable components and appropriately disposing of

remaining components;

 Tracking appliances through the entire process; and

 Processing rebate paym ents to customers.

Environmentally responsible disposal i nvolves removing chlorinated fluorocarbons

(CFCs) from the refrigerant and possibly foam insulation, preparing refrigerant for

reclamation or recycling, and re cycling other materials such as oil, glass, metal and plastic

components.

# 59 Customers participating in the program eliminate the hassle and cost associated

with disposing of large inef ficient and unwieldy appliances . This program also ensures

that old appliances are disposed of properly. In addition, customers save money through

rebates and reduced energy.

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric savings for the Appliance Re cycling program were 4,367,444 kWh, which

was 33 percent of total 2012 planned electric savings. Total spending for the Appliance

Recycling program was $899,827, which is 76 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 4,771 total appliances were recycled and rebated, compared to 5,082 in 2011.

 MidAmerican worked with the program contr actor to coordinate with Sears to pick

up appliances in MidAmerican’s service terr itory. This cooperative effort made the

program more convenient for the customer when Sears delivered an appliance.

 The program contractor’s improved proce ss in their new recycling facilities,

opened in 2011, was well suited to handle th e volume of the program compared to

their previous location. The new technology in the facility streamlined the process

and more efficiently recovered compressor oil and refrigerant.

 MidAmerican completed a joint media event with Alliant Energy highlighting the

program in May 2012.

 The program earned the Responsible App liance Disposal designation from the

United States Environmental Protection Agency.

# 60 Key Program Challenges in 2012

 Electric savings for this program we re significantly below the 2012 goal.

The program continued to ramp up more slowly than planned, but continues to

perform at approximately the same rate as IPL’s Appliance Recycling Program in

its initial years of operation.

 Program spending was below the 2012 budget but much higher than expected for the

level of participation in the program. It is taking time to build program awareness

and momentum.

Promotion

 A bill insert promoting the program wa s sent in March, July and November.

 A direct-mail piece featuring a refrigerat or magnet was sent to 50,000 customers to

increase program awareness.

 MidAmerican provided promotional materi als and signage to major appliance

retailers.

 The program was promoted with print ads in the Quad Cities, Des Moines, Storm

Lake, Jesup and Council Bluffs local papers.

 Program advertisements were placed in Welcome Home Magazine, HomeStyle

Magazine, Siouxland Life, Sioux land Magazine, Better Living

, Go Green, CV Home

and Garden, Elements Magazine, Room Magazine and QC Family Focus

.

 Program web advertisements were placed on various websites including Google,

DesMoinesRegister.com, SiouxCityJourna l.com, SouthWestIowaNews.com, PressCitizen.com, QCTimes.com

.

 Radio ads were placed in Des Moines, Sioux City, Council Bluffs, Iowa City,

# 61 Waterloo, and Davenport markets.

 6,867 postcards were mailed out to reside ntial equipment participants reminding

them of the opportunity to recy cle their existi ng appliances.

 The program was cross-promoted by incl uding a flyer in the HomeCheck leave

behind packet.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 MidAmerican will explore expanding th e program to include appliances

recycled through additional large retail chains and small retailers.

 Trade ally outreach for the program will continue to be expanded. Program analysis

indicates over 40 percen t of program particip ation occurs with the appliance retailer

when a customer comes in for a new app liance. MidAmerican will add new appliance

rebate and recycling display information for floor display models at the retailer to let

the buyer know new equipment and r ecycling rebates are available.

 MidAmerican will work with the program c ontractor to explore the possibility of

providing a recycling message and informati on on the sides and back of the trucks

used to pick up appliances. This will a llow customers and neighbors of customers to

see the messaging, which will help promote the program.

 A direct mail piece featuring a refrigerator magnet will be sent out to increase

awareness.

 Promotional efforts through bill inserts, di rect mail, print and multi-media type ads

will continue for this program.

# 62 Low-Income Program

The Low-Income program primarily encourages comprehensive energy efficiency

improvements in existing low-income housing by providing free energy au dits and free on-site

installation of heating, water he ating, lighting, refriger ation, and insulation measures. The Iowa

Department of Human Rights (I DHR), which manages a network of Community Action Program

(CAP) agencies, delivers the program by iden tifying qualifying households and delivering

auditing and weatherization serv ices. The Low-Income program supplements funding provided

by the Department of Energy’s Weatherization A ssistance Program through a long-term contract

with IDHR.

The program also includes an educati on component for Low-Income Home Energy

Assistance (LIHEAP)-eligible customers and a multifamily and institutional housing component

through an arrangement with the Iowa Finance Authority (IFA), Interstate Power & Light

Company (IPL) and Black Hills Energy. The Iowa Utility Association (IUA) facilitates and

coordinates certain aspects of the multifamily a nd institutional housing projects and The Energy

Group provides auditing services. The Cadmus Group, Inc. continue s to provide support to the

IUA member utilities for the delivery of the Energy Wise Program, the low-income education

component of the program. The Energy Wise Program and workshops provide an energy

efficiency information and products delivery channel to thousands of low-income customers that

are not eligible for traditional weatherization se rvices. Participating CAP agencies recruit Energy

Wise Program workshop participants through day-to-d ay interactions with their LIHEAP clients.

Each household that attends the training receiv es a take-home Energy Wise home savings kit

with two CFLs (one 14-watt and one 18-watt); a high-efficiency showerhead; energy-efficient

faucet aerators for the kitchen and bathroom; a furnace filter alarm; rope caulk; a digital

thermometer that tests temperature for a room , refrigerator, freezer and water heater; and a

# 63 water-flow measurement bag. Participants fill out a survey after their training, detailing their

experiences and successes with the self -installed measures at their homes.

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric and gas savings for the Low-Income program were 1,353,641 kWh and

143,917 therms respectively. These figures are 55 pe rcent of total 2012 planned electric savings

and 52 percent of total 2012 planned gas savings . Total spending for the Low-Income program

was $2,742,722, which is 94 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 640 homes participated in the progr am, compared to 1,171 homes in 2011.

 $2,425,000 in funding was provided to IDHR for weatherization services.

 1,316 Energy Wise Home Savings Kits were provided to local community action

agencies.

 Traditional single-family w eatherization services provide d through the IDHR contract

met its goals for electric savings, delivering 494,244 kWh in savings against a budget

of 468,000 kWh.

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 During 2011, MidAmerican provided supplementa l funding to IDHR at their request

to help IDHR utilize remain ing American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding,

doubling the 2011 contract amount. In 2012, spending returned to normal levels,

which caused a decline in single-family weatherization participation from 2011

levels.

 Budgeting assumptions for residential energy savings to be realized in 2012 through

the Iowa Finance Authority (IFA) multifamily and institutional housing program were

# 64 aggressive. IFA program energy savings were included in the residential budgets for

facilities participating in the IFA program with residential meters and tenants paying

the utility bills. However, no residential energy savings were realized from the

participating facilities. All facilities that participated in the IFA program during 2012

had nonresidential meters where the tenants’ utility bills were included in their

monthly rent. The result was a shortfall of 430,000 kWh and 8,100 therms for the IFA

program’s residential porti on of the Low-Income program budget. When the budgets

were established for this program in 2007, the assumption was that buildings with

nonresidential meters (landlord pays) w ould account for about 60 percent of the

activity and buildings with residential me ters (tenant pays) wo uld account for about

40 percent of the activity. Actual experi ence shows property owners that pay the

utility bills have been more interested in participating than property owners who do

not pay the utility bills. In prior years, the program has had residential meter building

activity, but improving marketability and propert y values of the facilities due to lower

tenant energy bills has not been as great an incentive for the property owners as

originally anticipated.

 There was a significant program shortfall in the quantity of Energy Wise Home

Savings Kits MidAmerican de livered through the community action agencies and the

energy saved in the plan budget for e ach Energy Wise Home Savings Kit.

o The plan called for 2,119 kits to be deliv ered with 453 kWh savings per kit and 46

therms savings per kit. However, onl y 1,316 kits with 377 kWh savings per kit

and 26 therms savings per kit were deliv ered. The result was a shortfall of

462,235 kWh and 62,604 therms in the Energy Wise Home Savings Kit portion of

the residential Low-Income program budget. The reason for this shortfall is the

# 65 community action agencies were on ly willing to accept 1,316 kits from

MidAmerican in 2012 because interest in the program had decreased. If the

community action agencies were able to utilize a greater number of kits,

MidAmerican was ready to supply them.

 The IFA nonresidential multifamily and inst itutional housing program portion of the

Low-Income program did not meet performance goals.

o The plan called for 583,000 in kWh savi ngs. Actual savings totaled only 357,657

kWh, creating a deficit of 225,676 kWh.

o The plan called for 9,369 therms to be saved. Actual savings totaled only 2,506

therms, accounting for a deficit of 6,863 therms.

 No measurable progress was made in working with the IFA on developing a

revolving loan fund for eligible multifamily properties with the grant IFA received for

this purpose from the MacArthur Foundation.

Promotion

 MidAmerican worked directly with Creat ive Visions to promote the Energy Wise

program. MidAmerican also worked jointl y with Cadmus Consulting, IPL and Black

Hills Energy to promote the Energy Wise program to community action agencies.

 Community action agencies promoted low-in come weatherization audits to eligible

customers.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 MidAmerican will work with IDHR to impl ement the program in 2013 at the contract

level of $2,450,000.

# 66  MidAmerican will work with Cadmus C onsulting and the Iowa Community Action

Agencies to evaluate the Energy Wise Home Savings Kits to determinewhat

adjustments are needed to help drive renewe d interest in the Energy Wise program in

2013.

o Cadmus will deliver Energy Wise program training to the community action

agencies in several locations.

# 67 Multifamily Housing Program

The Multifamily Housing program provides a comp rehensive set of services and financial

incentives to serve the varied needs of multifamily property owners, property managers,

landlords and renters in existing buildings. In th e past, the multifamily housing sector was served

separately through a vari ety of residential and commercial prog rams. To better serve this market,

these services were reorganized into a unified program that was first implemented in 2009 and

includes aggressive incentives and increased ma rket visibility to help overcome barriers

associated with this customer segment. The prog ram's marketing and deliver y strategies seek to

overcome the split-incentive market barrier associ ated with buildings occupied by residential

tenants. Property owners, who generally do not pa y utility bills, and tenants, who do not own the

property and cannot install high-efficiency equipm ent but usually do pay the utility bills, may not

have adequate incentive to invest in energy efficiency in this difficult-to-reach sector.

The Multifamily Housing program provides comprehensive on-site energy audits, free

low-cost efficiency measures and a co mprehensive audit report, which includes

recommendations for both indi vidual housing units and common ar eas. Customers may choose a

Prescriptive or a Performance Track for im plementing audit reco mmendations, with the

Performance Track providing a comprehensive, whole-building approach, high-level customer

support and generous incentives . The program also provides a mix of prescriptive and

customized rebates to tailor energy efficiency strategies to individua l properties, encourage

comprehensive improvements and maintain cons istency with other MidAmerican programs.

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric and gas savings for the Multifamily Housing program were 7,958,463 kWh

and 105,034 therms respectively. These figures are 967 percent of total 2012 planned electric

# 68 savings and 117 percent of total 2012 planned gas savings. These results were driven primarily

by energy savings realized through th e direct installation of no-cost meas ures at the time of the audit.

Total spending for the Multifamily Housing pr ogram was $1,147,017, which is 82 percent of the

2012 plan. Multifamily Housing is a new, first tim e offered program for this energy efficiency

plan and the budgets, when determined in 2007, have proven to be fairly accurate for audit count

and spending, but greatly underestimated custom er acceptance of direct installed measures,

especially the lighting measures. The 2012 budget called for a to tal of 441 electric measures to

be installed. In actuality, 62,034 li ghting measures were installed during 2012 with the majority

of them direct installed during the audits. Th is great difference explai ns why electric energy

savings are so far above budget.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 620 audits were completed in this pr ogram, compared to 1,388 during 2011.

 62,034 lighting measures were installe d, driving above-budget kWh savings.

 8,138 direct install natural gas saving meas ures were installe d, driving above-budget

therm savings. These measures included fau cet aerators, programmable thermostats,

energy saving sprayers, water heater pipe insulation and energy efficient

showerheads,

 MidAmerican developed guidelines during 2011, clarifying program procedures and

reducing incentives to better align with regional market prices. During 2012, the

adjusted incentives provided more accura te market signals to contractors and

customers.

# 69 Key Program Challenges in 2012

 The adjusted incentives reduced th e program’s audit count during 2012.

 Electric spending for the program was ove r budget, but natural gas spending was

below budget. Low natural gas prices limited gas participation and reduced insulation

rebates decreased natural gas spending. Ev en with spending at only 82% of budget,

energy savings were robust, exceeding budget for both kWh and therms savings.

 The upfront investment to upgrade rental pr operty continued to be a barrier for some

landlords and owners.

 Some landlords and owners preferred to inve st in visible investments. Fresh paint and

new floor coverings are more appealing to pot ential renters compar ed to the benefits

of energy efficiency measures.

 For many landlords and/or property manage rs, the fact that most multifamily housing

units are individually metered with the tena nt paying the monthly utility bills remains

a barrier. Uninformed property owners/manager s see little financial incentive to make

energy efficiency improvements.

Promotion

 MidAmerican worked directly with landlord associations and individual multifamily

property owners to promote th e Multifamily Housing program; this is in addition to

overall marketing and promotion of progra ms through television, radio and print

media.

# 70  A targeted marketing approach was used to reach property owners and managers.

o Relationships with landlords and prope rty managers were established and

maintained through memberships in th e Iowa Landlord Association and the

Central Iowa Apartment Alliance.

o Information was provided through associ ation newsletters, presentations at

association meetings, lunch and lear n sessions, tradeshow booths, and other

events where association members were made aware of prog ram offerings and

had access to MidAmerican staff to ask ques tions and discuss issu es unique to this

market.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 MidAmerican will continue networking with property owners/managers by

participating in the Iowa Landlord Asso ciation’s spring and fall trade shows,

attending association meetings and conduc ting lunch and learn sessions whenever

appropriate.

 Data detailing the Multifamily Housing program will be provided for the Central Iowa

Apartment Alliance’s monthly newsletter.

 The program will be promoted through trade ally outreach.

# 71 Agricultural Audit Program

The Agricultural Audit program is designed to provide services and incentives to serve

the specific needs of the agricult ural sector. The program is deliver ed through the a ssistance of a

program implementation contractor, Franklin Ener gy Services, who conducts an energy audit to

help customers better understand ho w their agribusiness uses energy and how to use energy more

efficiently to reduce monthly energy bills. Cu stomers receive an audit report that includes

recommendations for energy-saving actions, comple te with estimates of energy-savings potential

and general cost estimates for each recommended action, including low- or no-cost suggestions

for quick energy savings.

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric savings for the agriculture program were 331,405 kWh, or 49 percent of

total 2012 planned electric savings. The plan did not include a ga s energy savings goal; however

gas savings of 7,631 therms were achieved. Tota l spending for the Agriculture program was

$240,356 which is 69 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 68 energy audits were conducted, compared to 27 in 2011.

 Program-specific materials were develope d and more aggressive marketing and

promotion of the Agriculture prog ram was conducted across the state.

 Multiple large elevators and agricultural c ooperatives were identified that will be

targeted for program participation.

# 72 Key Program Challenges in 2012

 Electric spending and savings continued to be under budget due to the program being

relatively new, the ramping up of promoti on to the appropriate trade allies, and a

small customer base.

 Participation was hampered by the fact that MidAmerican’s moderate, diverse base of

farm producers is widely disbursed across th e service territory, with fewer than 9,000

known producers.

 Outreach with Trade Allies was a challenge due to the need for continual outreach to

ensure they understand how the program wo rks as well as how program promotion

will benefit them.

Promotion

 Farm Energy Taskforce meetings were attended; MidAmerican accepted a permanent

seat on the Taskforce.

 MidAmerican met with the Iowa Institute of Cooperatives in Ames and began

discussions about outreach and educa tional opportunities wi th its members.

 The Iowa Pork Congress, the World Pork Congress, and the Farm Progress Show

were attended specifically for ma rketing and trade ally outreach.

 A blitz promotion was started in the th ird quarter of 2012. The top 25 agricultural

energy users were identified and priority phone calls were made to those customers.

The response was positive and audit activity increased as a result.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 MidAmerican will continue aggressively marketing and promo ting the Agriculture

Program across the state.

# 73  Work will continue to make the pr ogram widely known and the program

implementation contractor a recognized partic ipant in Iowa’s netw ork of organizations

that support Iowa’s farm producers.

 MidAmerican or contractor personnel will attend agricultural events, such as the Iowa

Pork Congress and other ag ricultural trade shows.

 Program information will be presented at the quarterly Farm Energy Taskforce

meeting.

 Blitz campaign efforts to increase awareness and program participation will continue.

 Outreach to trade allies that work within the agriculture sector to increase program

awareness will continue.

# 74 Third-Party Program

The Third-Party program is a pilot program encouraging third-party contractors to

propose projects that capitalize on untapped energy efficiency pot ential from new markets,

technologies or approaches. Thir d-party contractors compete for project funding from a pool set

aside by MidAmerican for this program. Contractor s define the projects and financial assistance

they require from MidAmerican for implemen tation and MidAmerican awards funding to the

projects with the greatest promise for capturing energy savings that may not be realized through

MidAmerican’s other programs.

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

Total electric and gas savings for the Third-Party program were 11,087,249 kWh and

355,329 therms respectively. These figures are 166 pe rcent of total 2012 planned electric savings

and 103 percent of total 2012 pla nned gas savings. Total spendi ng for the Third-Party program

was $696,230 which is 19 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 Plan-to-date electric savings for the program total 11,087,249 kWh against a budget

of 11,679,280 kWh, which represents 95 percent of the plan-to-date goal. Prior to

2012, the Third Party program had no electric savings.

 Plan-to-date natural gas savings for th e program total 355,329 therms against a

budget of 603,803 therms, which represents 59 pe rcent of the plan-t o-date goal. Prior

to 2012, the Third Party program had no natural gas savings.

 10,124,316 kWh and 350,071 therms of savings were generated through the Home

Energy Report program, a pilot progra m implemented for approximately 50,000

combination service residential custom ers. The Home Energy Report program

# 75 facilitates energy savings using behavior modification strategies based on comparing

and ranking a customer’s energy usage vers us 100 similarly-situated homes. Six

reports were issued to participating cust omers during the year. At the end of 2012, the

total number of customers act ive in the program was 45,234. Over the course of the

year, the number of particip ants drops as customers in the program move from their

homes during the program period. Customer s that opt-out of the program also

contribute to the reduction of participan ts. As of December 15, 2012, opt-outs from

the program totaled 278. Other program highlights include:

o Electric savings from the Home Energy Re port program averaged about 2 percent

per household.

o Natural gas savings from the Home En ergy Report program averaged about 1

percent per household.

o During the year, the Home Energy Repor ts included additional promotional

messages for Appliance Recy cling in January 2012; Residential Equipment in

March 2012; HomeCheck and EnergyAdvantage ® 

# Financing for windows and

doors in May 2012; insulation rebates fo r households that have received a

HomeCheck audit but not yet added reco mmended insulation in September 2012;

and high efficiency natural gas furnace rebates in November 2012.

o Approximately 3,800 participants visite d the Home Energy Report’s customer

Web portal to access additional energy saving strategies and tips.

# 76  MidAmerican developed procedures for the Building Tune-Up program and began

implementation of the program.

o One customer completed a project and three additional projects were started that

will be completed in 2013. A controls c ontractor was involved in the completed

project for which an incentive was awarded during 2012.

o Total energy savings attributed to the completed Building Tune-Up project were

151,646 kWh and 5,258 therms.

 MidAmerican conducted a solid state light ing community grant project during 2012.

Four grants were awarded to the cities of Davenport (Phase I and Phase II), Des

Moines and Urbandale. The four grant aw ards accounted for 404 LED fixtures with

electricity savings of 166,009 kWh and peak demand savings of 39.5 kW. In addition,

preapprovals for additional grants were aw arded to Earlham, Io wa City, Norwalk and

Waterloo.

 The Money for Motors program was initiated during 2012. The incentives paid to the

motor distributors are part of the Th ird Party program. The motor bounty and

incentives for the new motor paid to cust omers are recorded in the Nonresidential

Equipment program. During 2012, 61 motor di stributor incentives were paid for a

total of $4,721.50. Further details of the Money for Motors program are found in the

Nonresidential Equipment program section..

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 When MidAmerican first started sending Ho me Energy Reports in the fourth quarter

of 2011, the customer comparison language for ranking purposes compared the

customer’s energy usage to 100 similarly-si tuated “neighbors.” The use of the word

# 77 “neighbor” caused more customer confusi on and phone calls to MidAmerican than

expected. To alleviate the concerns, the word “neighbor” was changed to “similar

homes” in January 2012. This language cha nge alleviated many customer concerns.

 Completing program design for Building-Tune -Up was challenging due to the need to

incorporate multiple implementation and follow-up steps, which required

coordination between the customer, the pr ogram implementation contractor and the

program installation contr actor, when applicable.

Promotion

 The Home Energy Report is an “opt out” ra ther than “opt in” program. Therefore, no

promotional efforts were utilized to ob tain participants. However, the reports

themselves promote energy saving tips a nd behaviors, other MidAmerican energy

efficiency programs and utilization of a cu stomer Web portal which allows for more

in-depth energy saving planning and provides additional strategies and tips.

 The Building Tune-Up program was promot ed by Key Account Managers and the

program’s implementation contractor.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 MidAmerican will continue the Home Energy Report Program and record the

corresponding residential energy savi ngs in the Third Party program.

 The Building Tune-Up pilot program will be continued.

 The final year of the Solid State Lighting community grant project will be completed,

advancing awareness of LED technol ogy solutions for outdoor lighting.

# 78  The final year of operation for the Money for Motors program will be completed,

paying motor distributor recy cling incentives as part of the Third Party program.

Further details of the Money for Motors program are found in the Nonresidential

Equipment program section.

# 79 Education Program

The Education program promotes energy e fficiency education through activities

organized into four general areas: awareness, trade ally support, trai ning and school curricula.

Awareness

Awareness is driven by MidAmerican’s adver tising and promotion activities that help

educate MidAmerican customers about the be nefits of energy efficiency. During 2011,

MidAmerican updated its Save Some Green advertising campaign in response to research that

began in 2010. The new Power in Your Hands campaign began running during August 2011 and

ran throughout 2012. Like prior cam paigns, it includes broadcast TV, cable TV, radio, print,

outdoor and Internet banner advertising to co mmunicate the importance a nd benefits of energy

efficiency to MidAmerican customers.

Another major advertising and promo tion activity in 2012 was the design and

development of the 2013 program brochures. The br ochures were completed in the third quarter

of 2012 and were made available to trade allies in the fourth quarter of 2012. MidAmerican uses

program brochures as handouts at many community events and trade shows throughout the

service territory. The goa ls of MidAmerican’s awareness efforts include:

 Educate customers on the benefits of energy efficiency and MidAmerican’s energy

efficiency programs;

 Increase customer awareness of EnergyAdvantage programs;

 Present simplified and personalized energy e fficiency messages in direct and serious

tones to help customers understand they can act on their own and be in control of

energy usage;

# 80  Improve communication with the traditi onally hard-to-reach small commercial

market;

 Improve communication on program offerings to key large industr ial customers; and

 Help MidAmerican achieve its aggressive plan participation and savings goals.

Trade Ally Support

Trade allies provide an importa nt delivery channel for MidAmerican’s energy efficiency

programs. Trade allies include ve ndors, installers, wholesalers, di stributors and ma nufacturers of

a wide range of energy efficiency products and se rvices. There also are trade allies specific to

these products, including architects, engineers, m echanical and electrical contractors and others.

Collectively, they support MidAmerican’s energy efficiency programs through various activities,

including:

 Informing customers that incentives are available for certain energy-efficient

products, often as part of the sales process;

 Explaining key differences between sta ndard and energy-efficient products; and

 Facilitating design, installa tion and operation of energy-efficient equipment.

Many of the mass-market energy efficiency programs, such as the Residential and

Nonresidential Equipment programs, rely heav ily on trade allies to promote and deliver the

programs. These trade allies suppo rt MidAmerican’s programs, use them to help increase their

own sales and educate MidAmerican mutual cust omers on the importance of energy efficiency.

The overall goals of the trade ally program include:

 Building and maintaining a strong trade ally network that increases customer

awareness of and participation in MidA merican’s energy efficiency programs;

# 81  Distributing information about en ergy efficiency programs to trade allies to help them

meet the needs of customers;

 Providing training opportunities to trade allies to help promote MidAmerican’s

energy efficiency programs and ensure tr ade ally understanding of HPwES and the

quality installation feature for furnaces and central air conditioners in residential and

nonresidential applications; and

 Increasing trade ally satisfaction with MidAmerican and its energy efficiency

programs.

Training

MidAmerican sponsors training programs for cust omers and trade allies to increase their

knowledge of specific energy efficiency areas and systems. MidAmerican attempts to leverage

its training activities by offering programs that are created and de livered by third-party providers

and by offering programs in coordination with ot her state and regional utilities. The training

program is an integral part of MidAmerican’s efforts to enhance its trade ally outreach and

support.

School Curricula

MidAmerican works with schools to integrat e energy efficiency e ducation into school

curriculum and extracurricular activities. MidAmerican offers a curriculum called eSMARTkids

to elementary school teachers throughout its se rvice territory. eSMARTkids is available on

MidAmerican’s website and MidAmerican provide s educational booklets to schools in its Iowa

service territory with the program.

# 82 2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

There were no planned electric or gas savi ngs in 2012. Total spending for the Education

program was $4,005,359 which is 86 percent of the 2012 plan and 9.7 percent higher than 2011.

The increased spending in 2012 was the result of having a full year of spending on

MidAmerican’s Trade Ally outreach plan. In 2011, the Trade Ally outreach plan was only active

for approximately 9 months of the year.

Key Program Successes and Activities in 2012

 eSMARTkids offering was used to deliver a comprehensive outreach program to

teachers, students and parents throug hout MidAmerican’s service territory.

o 29,094 students in grades K-6 received en ergy efficiency education, representing

17 percent of the target ed student population.

o 195 schools participated in the program; offerings were mailed to 705 schools,

which represented a 27.7 percent response rate.

o 746 educators participated in the prog ram, representing 21.4 percent of the 3,487

teachers contacted.

 University sports sponsorships on radio and television for the Univ ersity of Iowa and

Iowa State University continued. Radio spons orships for the University of Northern

Iowa continued.

 MidAmerican continued its smaller college and university sponsorship initiative.

Participants included Briar Cliff Univer sity, Drake University, Iowa Central

Community College, Iowa Western Community College, Mount Mercy College,

Northwestern College, Simpson College, Wartburg College, and William Penn

University.

# 83  MidAmerican sponsored the Cyclone Tailgate Tour in 2012. The Cyclone Tailgate

Tour made appearances in Dubuque, Cedar Ra pids, Waterloo, Omaha, Okoboji, Clear

Lake, Ottumwa, Bettendorf, Marshallto wn, Atlantic, Sioux City and Humboldt.

 Save Some Green. was advertised through televi sion, radio, outdoor, Internet and

print advertising.

 The trade ally outreach plan was exec uted with the following key results:

o 793 in-person visits

o 2,094 phone contacts

o 1,398 email/fax contacts

o 1,096 direct mail contacts

 Annual trade ally kick-off meetings to in troduce the 2013 programs were held in the

fourth quarter. Meetings were held in Sioux City, Council Bluffs, Des Moines, Fort

Dodge, Cedar Rapids, Waterloo and Davenport.

 Energy efficiency was promoted at 54 MidAmerican Night high school athletic

events.

 Energy efficiency was promoted at 47 comm unity and state-level events, including:

o Greater Iowa City Area Homebuilder Asso ciation Home & Builder Show - Iowa

City

o Iowa Construction Expo Trade Show - Des Moines

o Iowa State Fair – Des Moines

o Center for Active Seniors – Davenport

o Sioux City Home Show – Sioux City

o Iowa Geothermal Trade Show – Des Moines

o Principal Financial Earth Day – Des Moines

# 84 o Republic Energy Summit – Bettendorf

o Grainger Customer Product Show – Cedar Rapids

o Waterloo Housing Authority

o Central Iowa Apartment Alliance Trade Show - Urbandale

o American Institute of Architects Iowa Chapter Convention – Des Moines

 MidAmerican continued as a member of the Partnership for Industrial Energy

Efficiency or PIE 2 

# . PIE 2 

# is an ad hoc group with a common goal of promoting

industrial energy efficiency. Members incl ude Alliant Energy, Black Hills Energy,

MidAmerican, Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities, Iowa Association of Electric

Co-operatives, Corn Belt Power Co-opera tive, Iowa State University, Iowa Energy

Center, Center for Industrial Research and Service, Michaels Engineering and Energy

Solutions OTB. PIE 2 

# conducted four training events in 2012. In March 2012, a

webinar was conducted on Justifying Energy E fficiency as a Business Expense. There

were over 160 who registered for the we binar. In May 2012, 31 individuals attended

an Industrial Lighting Seminar between lo cations in Altoona and Bettendorf. In

September 2012, 39 individuals attended TA P Steam System Training, offered in

both fundamental and advanced sessi ons in Johnston. In November 2012, 75

individuals attended a Variable Speed Drive Seminar in Johnston.

 MidAmerican continued its elementary school activity with the Science Center of

Iowa by bringing Simply Electrifying assembly programs to elementary students in

MidAmerican’s Iowa service territory. Simply Electrifying reinforces National

Science Standards and provides electric safe ty and energy efficiency information to

students.

 MidAmerican supported the University of Nort hern Iowa in its behavioral research

# 85 funded by a federal science grant in the communities of LeMars , Charles City and

Oskaloosa. The research will investigate adoption of an energy efficient behavior

(changing furnace filters), an energy efficient technology (LED bulbs) and how to

increase adoption of audit recommendations.

 MidAmerican matched membership funds for the Energy Association of Iowa

Schools to provide targeted assistan ce to schools about efficiency.

 MidAmerican participated in joint resear ch evaluating efficient LED lighting for

customer acceptance through the Innovation, Elec tricity, Efficiency (IEE), an Institute

of the Edison Foundation. The testing comple ted on two fixtures and the Top Ten list

of results was posted in January 2013. IEE continues to work with its advisory

committee to find new uses for the information.

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 Development of the 2013 brochures was ch allenging due to the advancements in

technologies and changes in certain federa l minimum energy efficiency standards.

Many of these changes affected multiple programs.

 2012 was an election year and made placem ent of certain television and radio

advertisements more challenging than in othe r years. In particular , with Iowa being a

swing state in the presidential election, there was significant competition for

advertising time from political candi dates and other political action groups.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 MidAmerican will continue efforts to prom ote SAVE training and quality control.

o A coalition of Iowa utilities, the Iowa Energy Center and the MEEA sponsor the

SAVE training for HVAC contractors based on National Comfort Institute

# 86 curricula. The purpose of the training is to establish quality expectations and

standards for the installa tion of high efficiency heating and central air

conditioning equipment. Since 2010, 849 HVAC contractors in Iowa have

participated in the training and been ce rtified to conduct quali ty installations of

high efficiency heating and cooling equipment. The training costs $750 per

person. A federal stimulus grant was secure d to reduce contractor cost by as much

as $375 per person to encourag e participation in the SAVE training but this grant

will end in early 2013. The Iowa investor-o wned utilities will continue to offer

$375 scholarships per person to reduce th e SAVE training cost upon successful

completion of the course and passage of the test. Credits from the course are

available to meet Iowa licensure re quirements. Contract ors successfully

completing the course are entered on a lis t of certified contractors maintained by

MEEA. In 2013, these contractors will be el igible for an additional contractor

incentive SPIFF for installation of high efficiency equipment.

o Materials were developed to support contra ctors in marketing quality installation

to customers. The investor-owned utilitie s have assembled an advisory group of

HVAC contractors to assi st in program design.

o The investor-owned utilities will train qualified contractors during 2013, the last

year of the current five-year plan, and have proposed in the next five-year plan to

pay rebates for equipment only when insta lled by one of the c ontractors certified

and on the SAVE program approved list.

o There will be an aggressive verification plan in place to assure that equipment is

actually installed in accordan ce with quality installation standards. This extensive

training and certification progr am is being deployed to assure Iowa customers are

# 87 actually receiving the advertised equipm ent efficiencies when installed and

represents a major investment of time and resources over the past four years.

 MidAmerican will continue to increase energy efficiency awareness with the Power

in Your Hands theme through television, radio, outdoor, Internet and print

advertising. These advertisements will run throughout the year.

 Energy efficiency programs and tips will be promoted at community events and

various other events as opportunities arise.

 MidAmerican will promote energy efficiency programs at the Iowa State Fair.

 Outreach to teachers with eSMARTkids offerings will be continued.

 MidAmerican will continue to execu te its trade ally outreach plan.

 Sponsorship and energy efficiency promo tion efforts at smaller universities and

colleges will be promoted, while maintaining MidAmerican’s efforts at the University

of Iowa, Iowa State University and the University of Northern Iowa.

 MidAmerican will work with the PIE 2 

# group to facilitate a nu mber of training events

for Iowa industrial customers. The De partment of Energy’s Compressed Air

Challenge, both in fundamentals and advan ced offerings, is scheduled for June 2013.

The TAP Steam System Training is scheduled for September 2013

# 88 Trees Program

MidAmerican’s trees programs encourage tree planting through projects combining

customer education and financial grants. Educational activities deve loped in partnership with the

Iowa Nurserymen’s Association and the Iowa State Extension Service and delivered through

MidAmerican’s trees programs include: Plant Some Shade, Trees for Kids/Trees for Teens, Trees

for E-bill and Trees Please! . Financial grants via the Trees Please! program are made directly to

communities located in MidAmerican’s Iowa serv ice territory. Special projects include tree

plantings hosted by MidAmerican at local school s and parks. In addition, MidAmerican helps

fund the IDNR Trees for Kids/Trees for Teens programs.

2012 Results Compared to Plan and Budget

There were no planned electric or gas sa vings in 2012. Total spending for the Trees

program was $445,465, which is 86 percent of the 2012 plan. Total spending for the Trees

program was $223,292, which is 73 percent of the 2012 plan.

Key Program Success in 2012

 80 communities returned complete Trees Please! program applications and all 80

received financial grants. The seven larg est communities each received $20,000; the

majority of the remaining 73 communities each received $1,000. A total of 101

participation signs were delivered to 46 communities.

 Because of MidAmerican’s support of the IDNR’s Trees for Kids/Trees for Teens

program, 1,956 information packets were el ectronically mailed to principals and

superintendents. A total of 208 educators we re provided Project Le arning Tree one or

two-day trainings. A total of 37 Trees for Kids grants totaling $56,574 were provided

to schools planting 1,335 trees with 4,113 youth and 291 parents involved in tree

# 89 planting and maintenance, representing over 5,500 volunteer hours. IDNR estimated

the Trees for Kids plantings resulted in saving 17, 673 kilowatt-hours of electricity

and 5,273 therms of natural gas.

 As part of the Reading Rangers progra m, 15,000 pages were read by students and 750

trees were planted in state forests to reward their efforts.

 There were 11 Plant Some Shade events. Spring events were held in Cedar Rapids,

Council Bluffs, Davenport, Des Moines, Fo rt Dodge, Indianola, Iowa City and

Waterloo. Fall events were held in Des Moines, Oskaloosa and Sioux City. In all

2,994 trees were distributed to 1,345 customers.

 35,686 Iowa customers signed up for electronic bill payment as part of the Trees for

E-bill program, compared to 30,989 in 2011. The program provided for planting

1,215 large, landscaping quality trees whic h will take place in late April 2013.

 MidAmerican’s forestry department planted seven trees in seven communities served

by MidAmerican in conjunction with Arbor Day celebrations.

 101 Tout Your City’s Par ticipation signs were requested by 46 communities to

advertise their participation in the Tree Please! program. These signs are designed to

be used at the cities’ entrances or on poles where they have planted their trees. These

will be mailed in 2013.

 Polk County Conservation is now using an online ordering and electronic payment

application for the Plant Some Shade spring and fall events in Des Moines. This helps

with the tree inventory and tim e in processing tree orders.

 MidAmerican received the Tree Line USA award by the National Arbor Day Society.

Tree Line USA is sponsored by The Nati onal Arbor Day Foundation in cooperation

with the National Association of State Fo resters and recognizes public and private

# 90 utilities across the nation that implement tr ee management practices that protect and

enhance America’s urban forests.

 Trees for Kids began utilizing the nationally r ecognized environmental education

program Project Learning Tree . This environmental education program differs from

what Trees for Kids has traditionally delivered for cu rriculum in that educator (or

curriculum director) training is required as part of the curriculum. Upon completion

of a one- to two-day traini ng, the educator is given Project Learning Tree materials.

Trees for Kids will provide the training at no cost to the educator. It is believed that

this process will provide higher quality envi ronmental education to the students. The

curriculum is free to the educators, is tied to national and state curriculum standards,

and provides hands-on learning t ools for students and teachers.

Key Program Challenges in 2012

 With major flooding in the western and sout hwestern part of Iowa in 2011, several

communities chose not to apply for Tree Please! grants this year. Cleanup is

happening in these communities and trees will be needed in the upcoming years to

replace the trees that were destroyed dur ing the flooding. In addition, due to the 2012

drought, communities had to make extra effort to keep their newly planted trees

sufficiently watered. Weather continued to be a challenging factor for this program.

 Several Plant Some Shade events were held that requi red changing the types of trees

distributed at the sites due to the types of trees requested being unavailable at local

nurseries.

# 91 Promotion

 Tout Your City’s Participation signs were very popular for communities to advertise

their participation in the Tree Please! program. These signs are designed to be used at

the cities entrances or on poles where they have planted their trees.

 Ads were placed in local papers to advertise Plant Some Shade events.

 Tree Please! and Plant Some Shade events were promoted at Arbor Day celebrations.

Key Activities Planned in 2013

 MidAmerican will mail 101 Tout Your City’s Participation signs to 46 communities

to advertise their participation in the Tree Please! program. These signs are designed

to be used at city entrances or on poles where communities have planted their trees.

 1,215 Trees for E-bill will be planted by Living Lands & Wa ters in late April to early

May 2013.

# 92 Settlement Agreement Update

MidAmerican offers the following summary and progress report on additional plan

commitments made in the Settlement Agreement:

 MidAmerican agreed to participate in a “Statewide Coordination and Collaborative

Process.” ( See ARTICLE VI of the Settlement Agreement)

o MidAmerican participated in all coll aborative meetings held during 2012.

o Along with the other investor-owned Iowa utilities, and the MEEA, MidAmerican

continued to promote the SAVE trai ning program for heating, cooling and

ventilation contractors inte rested in providing/offeri ng their customers quality

installation of high efficiency HVAC equi pment. One of the major barriers

preventing Iowa HVAC dealers from partic ipating in SAVE was the cost of the

Common Cents software license. The Common Cents software allows the

contractor to enter performance informa tion and perform diagnostics while on-site

at the customer's home. Real time fee dback provided by the software makes it

practical for the contractor to ensure that the job is done right. The software also

automates many of the necessary calcul ations necessary to properly install

equipment. In order to overcome this major barrier, MidAmerican and the other

investor-owned Iowa utilities asked M EEA to hold the software license and

charge the utilities for use of the softwa re instead of the HVAC dealers starting in

2013. MEEA acquired the software license in 2012 and the utilities, rather than

the HVAC dealers, will be responsible for the fees associated with the use of the

Common Cents software by S AVE-certified dealers starting in 2013. This change

significantly increased the size and number of 2013 training sessions needed to

# 93 meet dealers’ demands to obtain SAVE certification. 2012 resu lts for the SAVE

training program were summarized earlier in the Residential Equipment program.

 MidAmerican agreed to monitor and poten tially adopt, beginning on January 1, 2011,

the key components of IPL’s Low Income initiative. ( See ARTICLE VII of the

Settlement Agreement)

o IPL’s Targeted Residential Energy E fficiency Option (TREEO) program was

offered in Grinnell and Mount Vernon, Iowa. IPL reports approximately 14

participants in 2012.

o The community action agencies implemen ting the program were charged with

finding eligible customers.

o The key feature of TREEO was that elig ible customers could receive certain

energy efficiency measures, but they mu st pay 10 percent of the cost. Finding

eligible customers that can afford 10 per cent of the cost of the measures was a

challenge for the community action agencies and IPL.

o In the 4 th 

# quarter of 2012 and 1 st 

# quarter of 2013, IPL performed additional

marketing, resulting in more than 300 pr ospects for 2013. IPL also reported that

several additional towns will be added to the program in 2013.

 MidAmerican agreed to offer “flexible, custom solutions for achieving energy

efficiency savings through the ENERGY ST AR component of the Residential New

Construction program and the HPwES compone nt of the Residential Audit program.”

( See ARTICLE VII of the Settlement Agreement)

o MidAmerican introduced the HPwES to HERS rating companies in Iowa City and

Des Moines beginning in July 2011. Th rough the existing Residential Audit

program, MidAmerican referred 117 cust omers to the HPwES pilot since 2011.

# 94 By the end of 2012, 36 initial audits were completed and four retrofit jobs were

completed and qualified for rebates.

o MidAmerican continued to offer the ENERGY STAR component in the New

Homes program. ENERGY STAR introduced new requirements in 2012. This

contributed to some confusion in the ma rketplace as the transition to the new

requirements took effect in early 2012. MidAmerican communicated extensively

to HERS raters and builders about the new requirements. Builders are continuing

to transition to the new EN ERGY STAR requirements.

 MidAmerican agreed to “include in it s proposed Education program activities

targeting the energy efficiency of home electronics, entertainment systems, and

phantom power loads.” ( See ARTICLE VII of the Settlement Agreement)

o Phantom Load/HDTV educational flyers were distribute d to HomeCheck

participants and to other cu stomers at various events.

o Under MidAmerican’s new Plan for 2014-2018, the direct install measures placed

in customers’ homes during a residential assessment will include a smart strip.

 MidAmerican agreed to implement an I ndustrial Optimization Pilot program as a

customer-driven component of the Nonres idential Energy Analysis program. Under

the Settlement Agreement, MidAmerican also agreed to implement additional

changes in the Efficiency Bid program re quirements, and to include in its Energy

Efficiency Plan an education pilot program designed to increase energy efficiency

program participation by i ndustrial customers with loads of 1 MW or above. ( See

ARTICLE VIII of the Settlement Agreement)

# 95 o Industrial Optimization Program Pilot (IOPP)

In November 2010, 91 applications we re mailed to eligible industrial

customers, customers with electric demand equal to or greater than twomegawatts. In addition to the three cu stomers from the Industrial Employers

Group who were grandfathered into th e program, only one application was

received. Upon further discussion with that customer, they concluded it is in their

best interest to stay within the framewor k of their participation in MidAmerican’s

Nonresidential Energy Analysis/ Efficiency Partners program. Of the three

grandfathered customers, only one tr ied to use the IOPP program. Although 13

projects were identified in an initial wa lk-through of a sectio n of the plant, zero

projects were installed at the customer’s facility. In 2012, the customer indicated

that any projects installed going forward will now use MidAmerican’s

Nonresidential Energy Analysis/ Efficiency Partners program. This pilot will not

be continued in 2013.

o Efficiency Bid

No changes were made to the Efficiency Bid program in 2012. Although

MidAmerican sent out electronic and di rect-mail requests for proposals in 2012

on January 2, April 1, July 1, and Octobe r 1 to approximately 170 Bid eligible

customers, no projects were recei ved in 2012. MidAmerican has found many

Efficiency Bid eligible customers are participating in the Nonresidential Energy

Analysis/ Efficiency Partners program instead of Efficiency Bid. Further details of

program are found in the Efficiency Bi d program section. The Efficiency Bid

program will end in 2013.

# 96 o Industrial Education Pilot Program

An energy efficiency report card was developed for key accounts in 2011.

The report card tracked energy efficien cy participation, cumulative energy

savings from energy efficiency projects a nd summaries of energy efficiency cost

recovery contributions. The first issue of report cards was hand delivered to

customers by their assigned key account manager so they could explain and

discuss. Subsequent quarterly report cards were generally emailed to the

customer. In 2011, report cards were ma iled to approximately 248 key accounts.

As of December 31, 2012, report cards were created and mailed for 850 key

accounts. Additional report cards will be developed as requested by the key

account manager or the customer. Several large industrial customers with multiple

facilities within MidAmerican’s service territory had report cards emailed each

quarter to key management pers onnel within their organization.

 MidAmerican agreed to undertake research and development to gain a better

understanding of opportunities for industr ial savings, and undertake research and

development and investigate market res ponses to the EISA 2007 requirements. ( See

ARTICLE IX of the Settlement Agreement)

o Industrial Savings Potential Pilot

The analysis of customers in the a ssigned five SIC groups was completed

in November 2010. A presentation was given on December 3, 2010, at the Iowa

Energy Efficiency Collaboration meeting and a 41-page report was delivered to

interested parties. An overall conclu sion from this study was that roughly 50

percent of the customers in each industry segment are actively using

MidAmerican’s energy efficiency programs. MidAmerican’s program

# 97 implementation contractor, Nexant, Inc., developed segment information sheets

and provided other technical bulletins for use by the key account managers

showing customers in these SIC codes wh at energy efficiency opportunities exist

in their industry.

o EISA 2007 Technologies

The Appliance Standard Awareness Pr oject (ASAP) provided a means for

following action on appliance standards. The project provided reports and

monthly newsletters for use in tracking th e status of standards. A comprehensive

report entitled The Efficiency Boom: Cashing In on the Savings from Appliance

Standards was published in March 2012, and assessed the impacts of new and

updated appliance standards. The report reviewed thirty-four product categories

that could be changing in the next four years. The report estimated the potential

energy savings, economic benefits, and em issions reductions from new standards

for these products. A state-by-state brea kdown of these impacts was provided in

an online appendix published on the ASAP website at http://standardsasap.org/

.

The estimates were based on the assessment of standards levels that are

achievable using available technology a nd, importantly, were cost-effective for

consumers.

MidAmerican examined lighting measures to determine whether any

program changes were required given th e new standards. No program changes

were deemed immediately necessary in 2012. However, MidAmerican does plan

to adjust the lighting baseline used for the 2014-2018 Plan.

# 98  Although street lighting is not a specific energy efficiency program, MidAmerican

agreed it would not “charge customers for eith er labor or materials for replacement of

company-owned mercury vapor st reet or security lights.” ( See ARTICLE X of the

Settlement Agreement)

o During 2012, MidAmerican continued to comp ly with the terms of the Settlement

Agreement regarding street lighting. MidA merican is planning to develop rates

for a small selection of company-owned unmet ered LED street lights as part of its

upcoming rate filing. MidAmerican plans to begin offering those lights on a

limited pilot basis following approval of its LED street light rates by the Board.

 MidAmerican agreed that it would “eva luate and address any obstacles that

inappropriately hinder the development of distributed renewable energy and

combined heat and power installations, such as interconnection processes and

procedures and tariff rates for backup and supplemental power.” ( See Article XII of

the Settlement Agreement)

o MidAmerican filed its evaluation re sults in January 2010. MidAmerican

personnel met on several occasions in 2012 w ith representatives of the OCA, the

ELPC, and the DOE Clean Energy Application Center located at the University of

Illinois at Chicago (UIC) to further discuss potential barriers to CHP/DG

presented by MidAmerican’s existing tariffs. MidAmerican personnel also

reviewed an analysis provided by the UIC.

o In August 2012, Iowa was notified that it had been awarded a grant by the

National Governors’ Associati on to participate in the NGA’s “ Academy on

Enhancing Industry through Energy Effici ency and Combined Heat and Power

(CHP)”, with a specific emphasis on unde rstanding and elim inating potential

# 99 barriers to CHP in Iowa. The Iowa task force for this effort included

MidAmerican staff. The task force held public meetings, surveyed current and

potential CHP customers, attended semina rs on best practices and developed a

recommendation to address identified issu es and provide education to customers

about various aspects of CHP.

o MidAmerican has developed a revamped ta riff for standby service to be filed in

conjunction with its upcoming rate increase filing. The goal of the tariff changes

are to make the tariff easier to understa nd and to ensure that standby customers

are appropriately charged for those cost s they cause MidAmerican to incur. A

draft of the new tariff was provided to the Office of Consumer Advocate and to

the Environmental Law and Policy Center, and discussions were held with both

groups regarding the changes.

 MidAmerican agreed to conduct a SSL pilot. ( See Article V of the Settlement

Agreement)

o In March 2011, MidAmerican rolled out a SSL grant program to MidAmerican’s

electrically served cities to provide partial funding for customer owned SSL

streetlights. In 2011, six ci ties were pre-approved fo r grants representing 434

individual SSL fixtures. Four of the six cities completed their projects and

received their grant in 2012. The four grants awarded accounted for 409 LED

fixtures and savings of 166,000 kWh and 39.5 kW. Four additional cities received

pre-approvals for their LED projects in 2012.

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL EQUIPMENT PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

Air Source Heat Pump 714 570,755 188.85 255,777.85 $

Central Air Conditioner 4,956 846,164 967.52 708,461.76 $

Central Air Conditioner

‐ Quality Install 390 370,777

‐ 19,500.00 $

Furnace Fan 2,344 1,353,767

‐ 117,200.00 $

Ground Source Heat Pump 470 2,607,320 1,292.39 833,751.97 $

Heat Pump

‐ Quality Install 98 178,582

‐ 9,600.00 $

Room Air Conditioner 566 54,974 62.86 14,150.00 $

HVAC MEASURE SUBTOTA L 9,538 5,982,338 2,511.62 1,958,441.58 $

CFL

‐ Hard Wired 222 10,754 2.03 4,440.00 $

CFL

‐ Self Installed 1,232,158 61,288,302 10,020.60 1,542,696.76 $

LIGHTING SUBTOTA L 1,232,380 61,299,056 10,022.63 1,547,136.76 $

Desuperheater 275 221,650 25.16 27,500.00 $

Electric Water Heater 291 23,693 2.70 14,550.00 $

Heat Pump Water Heater 15 24,718 2.81 1,500.00 $

WATER HEATING SUBTOTA L 581 270,060 30.67 43,550.00 $

Clothes Washer

‐ Energy Star 7,761 2,250,261 294.11 513,950.00 $

Dishwasher

‐ Energy Star 5,539 608,691 80.46 48,290.00 $

Freezer 594 38,388 5.30 14,850.00 $

Refrigerator 9,033 1,268,057 175.21 451,650.00 $

APPLIANCES SUBTOTA L 22,927 4,165,397 555.08 1,028,740.00 $

Thermostats 2,821 319,124 234.05 27,666.00 $

THERMOSTATS SUBTOTA L 2,821 319,124 234.05 27,666.00 $

Adjustments 125 (27,149) (7.71) (15,324.93) $

Supplemental Payments 24

‐ ‐ 10,755.00 $

OTHER SUBTOTA L 149 (27,149) (7.71) (4,569.93) $

Grand Total 1,268,396 72,008,827 13,346.32 4,600,964.41 $

Res Equip

‐ Elec Page 1 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL EQUIPMENT PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

Boiler 75 14,281 203.16 30,000.00 $

Furnace 8,695 828,686 11,788.99 2,898,605.24 $

Furnace

‐ Quality Install 631 30,899

‐ 31,550.00 $

HVAC MEASURES SUBTOTA L 9,401 873,866 11,992.15 2,960,155.24 $

Thermostat 3,107 61,237 871.29 42,973.00 $

THERMOSTATS SUBTOTA L 3,107 61,237 871.29 42,973.00 $

Gas Water Heater 2,917 37,179 99.55 178,957.22 $

Tankless Water Heater 314 19,731 52.82 94,200.00 $

WATER HEATERS SUBTOTA L 3,231 56,910 152.36 273,157.22 $

Clothes Washer

‐ Energy Star 8,458 140,449 379.80 556,750.00 $

Dishwasher

‐ Energy Star 4,883 35,787 95.72 76,825.00 $

ESTAR APPLIANCES SUBTOTA L 13,341 176,236 475.52 633,575.00 $

Adjustments 121 (4,169) (48.71) (14,995.00) $

Supplemental Payments

‐ ‐ ‐ 270.00 $

OTHER SUBTOTA L 121 (4,169) (48.71) (14,725.00) $

Grand Total 29,201 1,164,080 13,442.62 3,895,135.46 $

Res Equip

‐ Gas Page 2 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL AUDIT PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 231

‐ ‐ $32,781.00

Attic/Roof/Ceiling Insulation 1,691 315,209 258.22 $412,273.85

Crawl Space Insulation 209 26,184 20.73 $31,674.43

Doors 2 14 0.02 $173.80

Duct Insulation 21 12,494 12.73 $986.97

Foundation Insulation 306 91,641 62.25 $62,408.81

Infiltration 152 6,873 5.09 $8,807.03

R/B/J Insulation 386 34,855 38.16 $13,902.05

Wall Insulation 541 119,633 17.73 $123,415.15

Windows 432 11,406 12.92 $10,380.06

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 3,740 618,307 427.86 664,022.15 $

CFL Direct Install 38,320 3,109,535 585.21 $378,109.18

Faucet Aerators 603 36,602 4.16 $3,606.65

Pipe Insulation 260 8,379 0.96 $1,378.00

Low

‐ Flow Showerheads 439 125,422 14.24 $4,183.30

Thermostats 451 33,904 37.15 $18,280.00

Water Heater Blankets 11 1,932 0.22 $279.84

DIRECT INSTALL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 40,084 3,315,775 641.94 405,836.97 $

HPwES

‐ First Payment 29

‐ ‐ $1,305.00

HPwES

‐ Final Payment 4 64,025 24.34 $660.00

Adjustments 8 16,259 18.59 $11,868.54

Supplemental Payment 3

‐ ‐ $204.86

OTHER MEASURES SUBTOTA L 44 80,284 42.93 14,038.40 $

Grand Total 44,099 4,014,366 1,112.73 1,116,678.52 $

Res Audit

‐ Elec Page 3 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL AUDIT PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 5,261

‐ ‐ 745,783.50 $

Attic/Roof/Ceiling Insulation 2,288 169,023 2,404.50 1,076,254.34 $

Crawl Space Insulation 276 13,511 192.20 78,593.52 $

Doors 1 7 0.09 164.92 $

Duct Insulation 22 1,342 19.09 1,974.10 $

Foundation Insulation 398 38,841 552.55 155,950.59 $

Infiltration 188 4,292 61.06 20,433.53 $

R/B/J Insulation 561 11,954 170.05 39,081.27 $

Wall Insulation 801 74,851 1,064.83 373,406.53 $

Windows 460 1,426 20.29 16,791.72 $

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 4,995 315,247 4,484.65 1,762,650.52 $

Faucet Aerators 4,464 24,998 66.94 26,706.70 $

Pipe Insulation 2,353 5,097 13.63 12,470.90 $

Low

‐ Flow Showerheads 2,972 57,062 152.74 28,317.18 $

Thermostats 644 13,652 194.22 46,400.00 $

Water Heater Blankets 80 936 2.50 2,035.20 $

DIRECT INSTALL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 10,513 101,745 430.04 115,929.98 $

HPwES

‐ First Payment 29

‐ ‐ 3,045.00 $

HPwES

‐ Final Payment 4 2,982 20.74 1,540.00 $

Adjustments 18 (477) (6.78) (83,188.55) $

Supplemental Payment 2

‐ ‐ 346.87 $

OTHER MEASURES SUBTOTA L 53 2,505 13.96 (78,256.68) $

Grand Total 20,822 419,497 4,928.65 2,546,107.32 $

Res Audit

‐ Gas Page 4 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

ENERGY STAR/HERS HOMES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

ENERGY STAR HERS/INDEX COMBO 1,224 587,625 364.61 $686,191.28

ENERGY STAR HERS/INDEX COMBO

‐ Multifamily 116 22,815 5.10 $26,347.80

ENERGY STAR HERS/INDEX ELE COOL ONLY 254 104,551 105.20 $139,748.54

NEW HOMES HERS/INDEX ASHP HOME 53 26,054 13.90 $91,615.56

NEW HOMES HERS/INDEX GSHP HOME 178 223,539 80.50 $166,407.30

COMPREHENSIVE PAYMENTS/IMPACTS SUBTOTA L 1,825 964,584 569.31 $1,110,310.48

A/C <65 1,059 1,600,486 2,296.26 $100.00

A/C <65

‐ Multifamily 96 66,515 95.58 $0.00

AIR SOURCE HEAT PUMP 38 151,636 217.90 $400.00

FURNACE FAN 1,059 480,558

‐ $0.00

FURNACE FAN

‐ Multifamily 96 33,141

‐ $0.00

GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP 176 2,026,724

‐ $346,000.00

HVAC MEASURES SUBTOTA L 2,524 4,359,060 2,609.74 $346,500.00

DESUPERHEATER 136

‐ ‐ $13,600.00

ELECTRIC WATER HEATER 434 101,594 11.60 $0.00

ELECTRIC WATER HEATER

‐ Multifamily 144 16,746 0.91 $0.00

WATER HEATER SUBTOTA L 714 118,340 12.51 $13,600.00

CLOTHES WASHER ENERGY STAR 154 53,759 6.81 $12,750.00

DISHWASHER ENERGY STAR 905 102,896 13.39 $8,935.00

DISHWASHER ENERGY STAR

‐ Multifamily 106 2,405 0.30 $2,120.00

FREEZER 6 438 0.06 $150.00

REFRIGERATOR 505 73,724 10.15 $25,250.00

REFRIGERATOR

‐ Multifamily 13 1,894 0.26 $650.00

APPLIANCES SUBTOTA L 1,689 235,116 30.98 $49,855.00

ENERGY STAR LIGHTING 113 5,312 1.01 $600.00

INFILTRATION 205 385,070 603.39 $0.00

INFILTRATION

‐ Multifamily 48 28,863 45.23 $0.00

Adjustments 3

‐ ‐ ‐ $555.00

OTHER SUBTOTA L 369 419,245 649.63 $45.00

ENERGY STAR/HERS MEASURES Total 7,121 6,096,344 3,872.17 $1,520,310.48

Res N.C. HERS

‐ Elec Page 5 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

BUILDER OPTION PACKAGE HOMES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

AUDITS 61

‐ ‐ $24,400.00

NEW HOME/AIR SRC HEAT PUMP 27

‐ ‐ $29,599.97

NEW HOME/COMBINATION FUEL 32

‐ ‐ $10,861.10

NEW HOME/GROUND SRC HEAT PUMP 24

‐ ‐ $18,100.00

PREPAID ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT 2

‐ ‐ $100.00

COMPREHENSIVE PAYMENTS SUBTOTA L 146

‐ ‐ $83,061.07

A/C < 65 MBTU 28 3,648 4.81 $0.00

AIR SOURCE HEAT PUMP 15 9,536 3.57 $0.00

GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP 23 184,307 67.77 $44,000.00

THERMOSTA T 18 7,952 2.60 $0.00

HVAC MEASURES SUBTOTA L 84 205,444 78.75 $44,000.00



# CFL SELF

‐ INSTALLED 15 799 0.15 $300.00



# LIGHTING MEASURES SUBTOTAL 15 799 0.15 $300.00

ATTIC/CEILING INSULATION 56 3,814 0.28 $0.00

INFILTRATION 63 33,630 11.55 $0.00

R/B/J INSULATION 16 3,922 1.41 $0.00

THERMAL DOOR/ENERGY STAR 48 8,748

‐ $0.00

WALL INSULATION 34 11,443

‐ $0.00

WINDOWS 44 4,041

‐ $0.00

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 261 65,598 13.25 $0.00

DESUPERHEATER 17 12,942 1.46 $1,600.00

ELECTRIC WATER HEATER 43 3,947 0.45 $0.00

WATER HEATING MEASURES SUBTOTA L 60 16,889 1.91 $1,600.00

CLOTHES WASHER ENERGY STAR 27 11,560 1.45 $2,450.00

DISHWASHER ENERGY STAR 54 8,918 1.12 $900.00

ESTAR REFRIGERATOR/RES SIZE 55 8,385 1.16 $2,750.00

ESTAR FREEZER/RES SIZE 2 144 0.02 $50.00

ENERGY STAR APPLIANCES SUBTOTA L 138 29,007 3.74 $6,150.00

BUILDER OPTION PACKAGE MEASURES Total 704 317,736 97.80 $135,111.07

Res N.C. BOP

‐ Elec Page 6 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

QUALITY INSTALL (SAVE) MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

SAVE DUCTWORK 4 146

‐ $200.00

SAVE MEASURES SUBTOTA L 4 146

‐ $200.00

QUALITY INSTALL (SAVE) MEASURES Total 4 146

‐ $200.00

Res N.C. SAVE

‐ Elec Page 7 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

ENERGY STAR/HERS HOMES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

ENERGY STAR HERS/INDEX COMBO 1,246 181,834 8,426.31 $1,797,203.39

ENERGY STAR HERS/INDEX COMBO

‐ Multifamily 140 2,882 44.28 $69,164.55

ENERGY STAR HERS/INDEX GAS HT ONLY 629 42,837 2,029.96 $808,240.31

ENERGY STAR HERS/INDEX GAS HT ONLY

‐ Mul Ɵ family 11 984 15.14 $5,227.20

HERS COMPREHENSIVE PAYMENTS/IMPACTS SUBTOTA L 2,026 228,537 10,515.69 $2,679,835.45

CLOTHES WASHER ENERGY STAR 66 937 2.51 $3,500.00

DISHWASHER ENERGY STAR 883 6,299 16.83 $14,600.00

ENERGY STAR APPLIANCES SUBTOTA L 949 7,236 19.34 $18,100.00

FURNACE < 225 1,422 671,232 10,294.61 $1,300.00

FURNACE < 225

‐ Multifamily 120 13,208 202.29 $0.00

HVAC SUBTOTA L 1,542 684,440 10,496.90 $1,300.00

NATURAL GAS WATER HEATER 1,019 19,320 78.71 $0.00

TANKLESS WATER HEATER 22 2,497 10.17 $0.00

WATER HEATER SUBTOTA L 1,041 21,817 88.88 $0.00

PREPAID GAS EQUIPMENT 2

‐ ‐ $1,595.00

ADJUSTMENTS 2

‐ ‐ ‐ $1,265.00

SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT 1

‐ ‐ $950.00

OTHER SUBTOTA L 5

‐ ‐ $1,280.00

ENERGY STAR/HERS MEASURES Total 5,563 942,030 21,120.82 $2,700,515.45

Res N.C. HERS

‐ Gas Page 8 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

BUILDER OPTION PACKAGE (BOP) HOMES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

AUDITS 101

‐ ‐ $40,400.00

NEW HOME MEC COMBINATION 32

‐ ‐ $22,336.86

NEW HOME MEC GAS HT ONLY 63

‐ ‐ $43,022.79

BOP COMPREHENSIVE PAYMENTS SUBTOTAL 196

‐ ‐ $105,759.65

FURNACE < 225 64 4,659 61.60 $0.00

BOILER <300 1 95 1.15 $0.00

HVAC MEASURES SUBTOTA L 65 4,754 62.75 $0.00

NATURAL GAS WATER HEATER 35 624 1.67 $0.00

WATER HEATING SUBTOTA L 35 624 1.67 $0.00

ATTIC/CEILING INSULATION 59 431 5.23 $0.00

INFILTRATION 64 2,507 30.43 $0.00

R/B/J INSULATION 31 632 7.67 $0.00

THERMAL DOOR 115 1,656 20.10 $0.00

WALL INSULATION 64 1,724 20.92 $0.00

WINDOWS 308 2,209 2.83 $0.00

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 641 9,160 87.18 $0.00

CLOTHES WASHER ENERGY STAR 21 214 0.84 $1,250.00

DISHWASHER ENERGY STAR 49 364 0.97 $920.00

ENERGY STAR APPLIANCES SUBTOTA L 70 578 1.82 $2,170.00

THERMOSTA T 35 2,023 24.55 $0.00

THERMOSTAT SUBTOTA L 35 2,023 24.55 $0.00

BUILDER OPTION PACKAGE MEASURES Total 1,042 17,139 177.97 $107,929.65

Res N.C. BOP

‐ Gas Page 9 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

QUALITY INSTALL (SAVE) MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

SAVE DUCTWORK 4 162

‐ $200.00

SAVE MEASURES SUBTOTA L 4 162

‐ $200.00

QUALITY INSTALL (SAVE) MEASURES Total 4 162

‐ $200.00

Res N.C. SAVE

‐ Gas Page 10 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

LOAD MANAGEMENT SUBTOTA L 60,572 1,935,645 66,918 $2,078,792.50

Grand Total 60,572 1,935,645 66,918 $2,078,792.50

Res L.M.

‐ Elec Page 11 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL EQUIPMENT PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

Air Source Heat Pump 143 135,773 31.18 $54,845.00

Central Air Conditioner 250 181,697 96.71 $61,191.71

Chiller 9 842,601 304.24 $124,576.80

Demand Controlled Ventilation 2 11,496

‐ $789.00

Furnace Fan 108 111,707 10.67 $19,065.00

Ground Source Heat Pump 137 254,196 45.74 $284,205.00

Packaged Air Conditioner 186 35,558 19.16 $9,300.00

Packaged Heat Pump 21 7,354 2.09 $1,050.00

Room Air Conditioner 29 2,674 1.42 $725.00

Water Source Heat Pump 2 4,688 0.68 $1,235.40

HVAC SUBTOTA L 887 1,587,74 4 511.89 556,982.9 1 $

Attic/Roof/Ceiling Insulation 25 114,766 10.16 $16,097.08

Doors 22 5,135 13.47 $413.65

Infiltration 1 21 0.01 $85.12

Wall Insulation 8 47,051 1.91 $3,333.79

Windows 297 134,594 368.49 $24,631.96

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 353 301,567 394.05 44,561.6 0 $

CFL

‐ Self Install 41,735 8,357,078 1,640.22 $67,276.64

Daylight Harvesting Ballast 185 7,376 1.51 $4,625.00

LED Lighting 16,241 5,086,157 1,057.13 $637,500.64

Metal Halide Lighting 468 200,825 38.50 $6,198.00

Occupancy Sensors 2,039 1,193,924 231.83 $40,780.00

T

‐ 5 Lighting 3,370 1,502,783 286.58 $232,114.00

T

‐ 8 Lighting 26,938 7,174,734 1,368.23 $717,515.25

Timing Controls 15 76,519 14.67 $300.00

LIGHTING SUBTOTAL 90,991 23,599,39 6 4,638.67 $1,706,309.5 3

Desuperheater 18 14,508 2.37 $1,800.00

Electric Water Heater 10 1,123 0.18 $500.00

Heat Pump Water Heater 1 1,007 0.16 $100.00

WATER HEATING SUBTOTA L 29 16,639 2.72 $2,400.0 0

Motor Bounty 61

‐ ‐ $80,041.07

Motors 24 40,051 4.57 $3,840.00

Variable Speed Drives 463 21,900,279 1,844.97 $653,491.51

MOTORS/DRIVES SUBTOTA L 548 21,940,331 1,849.5 4 $737,372.5 8

Clothes Washer 72 26,928 4.03 $5,750.00

Dishwasher 52 8,291 1.24 $845.00

Freezer 18 3,815 0.63 $750.00

Hot Food Holding Cabinet 2 4,085 0.55 $500.00

Ice Maker 4 14,887 2.47 $400.00

Refrigerated Vending Controls 8 9,120 1.43 $400.00

Refrigerator 170 37,482 6.21 $10,425.00

Thermostats 59 46,733 14.94 $748.00

APPLIANCES/EQUIPMENT SUBTOTA L 385 151,341 31.5 0 $19,818.0 0

Adjustments 9 ($349.00)

Supplemental Payments 4

‐ ‐ $11,490.00

OTHER SUBTOTAL 13

‐ ‐ $11,141.0 0

Grand Total 93,206 47,597,01 8 7,428.37 $3,078,585.6 2

Nonres Equip

‐ Elec Page 12 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL EQUIPMENT PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK INCENTIVE

Boiler 20 17,975 119.65 27,550.16 $

Demand Controlled Ventilation 2 1,098

‐ 2,211.00 $

Furnace 522 55,732 696.88 163,875.00 $

HVAC SUBTOTA L 544 74,805 816.53 193,636.16 $

Attic/Roof/Ceiling Insulation 25 16,408 205.17 29,390.29 $

Doors 25 2,241 5.38 9,118.01 $

Infiltration 4 153 1.91 1,638.98 $

Wall Insulation 11 9,362 117.06 1,847.43 $

Windows 40 1,254 3.77 5,008.90 $

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 105 29,417 333.29 47,003.61 $

Gas Water Heater 43 561 1.82 8,158.56 $

Tankless Water Heater 25 599 2.53 7,500.00 $

WATER HEATING SUBTOTA L 68 1,160 4.34 15,658.56 $

Clothes Washer 33 494 1.62 2,300.00 $

Conveyor Oven 2 2,388 7.01 1,000.00 $

Covection Oven 1 263 0.77 200.00 $

Dishwasher 14 100 0.33 220.00 $

Fryer 3 1,105 3.25 1,500.00 $

Steam Cooker 2 266 0.78 1,000.00 $

Thermostat 66 5,049 63.13 1,040.00 $

APPLIANCES/EQUIPMENT SUBTOTA L 121 9,665 76.89 7,260.00 $

Adjustment 1 (88) (1.10) (325.00) $

OTHER SUBTOTA L 1 (88) (1.10) (325.00) $

Grand Total 839 114,960 1,229.96 263,233.33 $

Nonres Equip

‐ Gas Page 13 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL CUSTOM PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

AIR COMPRESSOR 4 71,288 16.43 10,956.00 $

BOILER BURNER 1 6,870

‐ 780.00 $

CFL LIGHTING 6,405 1,122,156 128.10 14,639.00 $

CHILLERS 3 261,677 91.96 41,607.00 $

COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEM 3 561,315 120.99 64,792.00 $

COMPRESSOR CONTROLS 2 3,552 1.60 837.00 $

DESTRATIFICATION FANS 6 (66,892)

‐ ‐ $

DISHWASHER

‐ ENERGY STAR 1 2,595

‐ 152.00 $

ECM MOTORS 20 18,950 2.20 2,148.00 $

EMS 6 592,745 170.38 86,867.35 $

FLUORESCENT LIGHTING 68 67,312 7.70 5,867.00 $

GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP 2 238,950 22.70 39,645.00 $

HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEM 2 659,717 1.90 46,806.00 $

HVAC SYSTEM 6 694,256 80.58 167,427.00 $

INDUCTION LIGHTING 306 2,057,562 234.90 196,544.00 $

INFRARED HEATING 2 70,690

‐ 9,700.00 $

LED LIGHTING 4,916 3,104,790 582.50 388,622.00 $

LIGHTING REDESIGN 1,610 421,842 118.50 65,659.00 $

OTHER 10 166,499 34.30 23,265.06 $

REDUCED WATTAGE LIGHTING 656 14,138 2.00 732.00 $

REDUCED WATTAGE T8 4,433 286,852 64.10 40,160.00 $

REFRIGERATION SYSTEM 3 20,181 2.30 1,818.00 $

ROOF INSULATION 2,764 1,100

‐ 155.30 $

SIDE WALL INSULATION 1 1,651 0.88 5,975.13 $

T

‐ 5 LIGHTING 192 166,410 54.30 34,149.00 $

T

‐ 8 LIGHTING 4,030 656,640 113.00 90,522.00 $

THERMAL DOORS 2 66 0.07 27.00 $

WELDER 2 34,800 6.50 4,887.00 $

WINDOWS 37 515 0.54 214.00 $

Grand Total 25,493 11,238,227 1,858.43 1,344,952.84 $

Nonres Custom

‐ Elec Page 14 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL CUSTOM PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

BOILER BURNER 4 14,300 98.97 25,141.00 $

BOILER STACK DRAFT CONTROL 1 21,348 92.90 31,203.00 $

BOILER SYSTEM 4 20,499 162.39 36,240.00 $

DESTRATIFICATION FANS 6 13,841 58.13 16,014.00 $

DOCK DOOR WEATHERSTRIPPING 33 4,778 28.40 10,034.00 $

EMS 4 7,762 55.15 13,244.09 $

ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATION SYSTEM 1 7,421 82.02 11,500.00 $

GAS FIRED RADIANT HEAT 2 1,435 18.00 3,016.00 $

HVAC SYSTEM 4 62,790 478.82 74,368.00 $

INFILTRATION 61 6,189 7.74 17,266.22 $

OZONE LAUNDRY SYSTEM 3 4,770 13.07 9,212.00 $

POOL COVER 2 15,217 41.67 12,552.94 $

PROCESS WATER HEATING SYSTEM 1 19,050 60.90 44,007.00 $

ROOF INSULATION 2,764 415 2.50 999.58 $

SPRAY FOAM ATTIC INSULATION 1 275 3.44 600.00 $

THERMAL DOORS 15 193 2.32 1,341.00 $

THERMAL SHADING CURTAIN 1 3,579 44.80 7,086.00 $

VAV 1 14,096 83.60 29,441.16 $

VAV EMS 1 26,184 289.39 37,230.00 $

VENTILATION HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEM 1 5,040 21.90 10,584.00 $

WINDOWS 51 2,292 26.76 4,393.00 $

Grand Total 2,961 251,474 1,672.87 395,472.99 $

Nonres Custom

‐ Gas Page 15 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL EFFICIENCY BID PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

NO ELECTRIC MEASURES IN 2012

NONRESIDENTIAL EFFICIENCY BID PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

NO GAS MEASURES IN 2012

Nonres Bid Page 16 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

SMALL COMMERCIAL AUDIT PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 1,192

‐ ‐ 220,993.34 $

Air Source Heat Pump 34 24,164 5.86 12,600.00 $

Central Air Conditioner 58 37,748 20.09 12,429.17 $

Chiller 1 9,570 3.46 2,460.00 $

Furnace Fan 17 8,129

‐ 850.00 $

Ground Source Heat Pump 11 7,776 1.25 8,320.00 $

Packaged Air Conditioner 113 12,304 6.55 5,650.00 $

Retrofit VAV 1 449,800 172.30 40,950.00 $

Room Air Conditioner 24 2,454 1.31 600.00 $

HVAC MEASURES SUBTOTA L 259 551,944 210.81 83,859.17 $

Attic/Roof/Ceiling Insulation 61 79,925 12.35 35,153.36 $

Crawl Space Insulation 2 834 0.03 233.58 $

Doors 26 6,184 20.04 866.82 $

Foundation Insulation 1 105 0.12 210.17 $

Infiltration 39 3,197 0.72 745.13 $

R/B/J Insulation 2 375 0.13 118.75 $

Wall Insulation 22 52,216 4.99 2,990.56 $

White Roof 1 2,220 0.80 30.00 $

Windows 51 17,307 48.25 3,103.18 $

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 205 162,362 87.43 43,451.55 $

CFL

‐ Self

‐ Installed 2,519 1,157,120 219.72 9,517.34 $

Custom Lighting 159 36,863 13.08 6,100.00 $

Induction Lighting 8 5,096 2.00 858.00 $

LED Lighting 5,206 1,247,140 309.00 169,700.41 $

Lighting Redesign 1,032 122,658 65.40 27,573.00 $

Metal Halide Fixtures 63 21,820 4.18 2,900.00 $

Occupancy Sensors 546 367,883 70.95 10,920.00 $

Reduced Wattage Lighting 2,789 51,591 10.10 4,920.00 $

T

‐ 5 Lighting 1,248 392,451 74.84 89,842.00 $

T

‐ 8 Lighting 19,771 2,842,971 542.16 841,926.86 $

Timing Controls 3 7,258 1.39 60.00 $

LIGHTING MEASURES SUBTOTA L 33,344 6,252,852 1,312.82 1,164,317.61 $

Clothes Washer

‐ Energy Star 4 1,127 0.17 250.00 $

Dishwasher

‐ Energy Star 8 749 0.12 55.00 $

Freezers 3 199 0.03 $75.00

Hot Food Holding Cabinet 1 1,029 0.14 250.00 $

Ice Maker 1 1,242 0.21 100.00 $

Refrigerators 26 9,083 1.50 2,075.00 $

Variable Speed Drives 2 94,559

‐ 2,750.00 $

APPLIANCES AND MOTORS SUBTOTA L 45 107,988 2.17 5,555.00 $

CFL

‐ Direct Install 11,504 1,243,395 255.17 67,327.65 $

Faucet Aerator 555 13,677 2.13 1,744.23 $

Sprayers 10 1,265 0.18 $579.40

Pipe Insulation 14 33 0.01 $64.92

Refrigerator Vending Controls 32 36,480 5.73 5,864.32 $

Showerheads 141 14,314 1.67 1,949.94 $

Thermostat 23 11,746 5.65 240.00 $

Water Heater Blankets 2 157 0.03 50.88 $

S.C. Audit

‐ Elec Page 17 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

SMALL COMMERCIAL AUDIT PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

DIRECT INSTALL SUBTOTA L 12,281 1,321,068 270.57 77,821.34 $

Adjustments 7 8,720 5.48 17,008.89 $

Supplemental Payments 1

‐ ‐ 2,053.20 $

DDC Controls 1 11,325 1.50 2,237.08 $

Demand

‐ Controlled Ventilation 9 51,732

‐ 3,550.50 $

Energy Management System 1 47,149

‐ 6,670.00 $

OTHER MEASURES SUBTOTA L 19 118,926 6.98 31,519.67 $

Grand Total 47,345 8,515,140 1,890.78 1,627,517.68 $

S.C. Audit

‐ Elec Page 18 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

SMALL COMMERCIAL AUDIT PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 997

‐ ‐ 106,967.66 $

Boiler 18 23,779 205.46 44,764.99 $

Furnace 103 12,387 154.89 34,450.00 $

Gas

‐ Fired Radiant Heater 3 1,083 13.50 2,358.00 $

Heating System Conversion 1 4,514 33.10 9,209.00 $

HVAC SUBTOTA L 125 41,763 406.94 90,781.99 $

Attic/Roof/Ceiling Insulation 61 17,438 218.05 88,049.34 $

Doors 35 3,453 8.28 13,293.43 $

Infiltration 38 373 4.74 1,367.68 $

Wall Insulation 18 28,632 358.02 7,958.88 $

White Roof 1 (120) (0.70)

‐ $

Windows 38 1,536 4.62 6,135.83 $

Window Redesign 1 310 1.80 622.78 $

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 192 51,622 594.81 117,427.94 $

Faucet Aerator 1,586 628 2.46 5,060.26 $

Pipe Insulation 17 1 0.01 71.54 $

Showerhead 384 158 0.75 5,313.60 $

Sprayer 34 221 0.65 1,946.97 $

Thermostat 34 2,601 32.52 520.00 $

DIRECT INSTALL SUBTOTA L 2,055 3,610 36.38 12,912.37 $

Clothes Washer

‐ Energy Star 4 63 0.21 250.00 $

Convection Oven 8 2,104 6.18 1,600.00 $

Dishwasher

‐ Energy Star 8 56 0.18 125.00 $

Fryer 1 498 1.46 500.00 $

APPLIANCES SUBTOTA L 21 2,721 8.04 2,475.00 $

Direct Contact Water Heater 1 2,257 9.50 4,197.00 $

Gas Water Heater 5 26 0.11 300.00 $

Process Water Heating 1 4,046 17.00 9,346.00 $

Tankless Water Heater 14 339 1.43 4,200.00 $

WATER HEATERS SUBTOTA L 21 6,668 28.04 18,043.00 $

Adjustments 3

‐ ‐ (349.16) $

DDC Controls 1 540 3.20 1,260.92 $

Demand

‐ Controlled Ventilation 1 549

‐ 1,105.50 $

Energy Management System 1 3,775 14.05 7,830.00 $

OTHER MEASURES SUBTOTA L 6 4,864 17.25 9,847.26 $

Grand Total 3,417 111,248 1,091.47 358,455.22 $

S.C. Audit

‐ Gas Page 19 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL ENERGY ANALYSIS PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

CUSTOM MEASURES SUBTOTAL 459 22,199,906 1,866.80 2,055,078.82 $

Action Plan Development 1,174

‐ ‐ 187,347.84 $

Energy Study 14

‐ ‐ 62,700.00 $

Facility Assessment 373

‐ ‐ 622,744.73 $

Installation Notice 844

‐ ‐ 303,738.63 $

Study Review 192

‐ ‐ 84,322.03 $

Summary Review 913

‐ ‐ 419,525.93 $

AUDIT/ANALYSIS SUBTOTA L 3,510

‐ ‐ 1,680,379.16 $

Motors 27 37,735 4.93 5,380.00 $

Variable Speed Drives 83 4,630,648 757.54 158,885.75 $

MOTORS/DRIVES SUBTOTA L 110 4,668,382 762.47 164,265.75 $

Air Source Heat Pump 7 6,565 1.62 2,800.00 $

Central Air Conditioner 4 6,349 3.38 1,750.00 $

Chilled Water Reset 1 25,075

‐ 389.00 $

Ground Source Heat Pump 5 21,905 3.28 25,697.00 $

Thermostats 1 1,739 0.25 20.00 $

Windows 2 4,928 16.65 705.60 $

HVAC SUBTOTA L 20 66,561 25.18 31,361.60 $

CFL

‐ Screw In 996 616,525 117.02 1,984.48 $

LED Lighting 1,038 412,693 73.25 47,090.00 $

Metal Halide Lamps 54 14,152 2.71 162.00 $

Occupancy Sensors 359 159,081 31.41 7,180.00 $

T

‐ 5 Lighting 230 150,353 28.67 17,520.00 $

T

‐ 8 Lighting 1,557 169,474 50.07 34,947.00 $

LIGHTING SUBTOTA L 4,234 1,522,278 303.14 108,883.48 $

Clothes Washer

‐ Energy Star 1 315 0.05 100.00 $

Dishwasher

‐ Energy Star 1 83 0.01 5.00 $

Freezer 3 2,358 0.39 275.00 $

Ice Maker 2 1,440 0.24 200.00 $

Refrigerator 1 117 0.02 50.00 $

APPLIANCES SUBTOTA L 8 4,313 0.71 630.00 $

Attic/Roof/Ceiling Insulation 4 1,986 0.53 941.13 $

INSULATION MEASURES SUBTOTA L 4 1,986 0.53 941.13 $

Adjustments 26

‐ ‐ 50.29 $

Supplemental Payments 55

‐ ‐ 319,535.00 $

OTHER SUBTOTA L 81

‐ ‐ 319,585.29 $

Grand Total 8,426 28,463,427 2,958.83 4,361,125.23 $

Nonres E.A.

‐ Elec Page 20 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL ENERGY ANALYSIS PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

CUSTOM MEASURES SUBTOTAL 35 220,397 2,862.00 171,831.00 $

Action Plan Development 523

‐ ‐ 31,916.55 $

Detailed Study Review 8

‐ ‐ 2,721.32 $

Facility Assessment 191

‐ ‐ 91,499.62 $

Project Installation Notice 52

‐ ‐ 25,083.26 $

Project Summary Review 63

‐ ‐ 35,923.33 $

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 837

‐ ‐ 187,144.08 $

Furnace 1 107 1.34 325.00 $

HVAC SUBTOTA L 1 107 1.34 325.00 $

Attic/Roof/Ceiling Insulation 4 2,099 27.00 3,764.52 $

Miscellaneous Insulation 1 151 0.19 857.81 $

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 5 2,250 27.19 4,622.33 $

Dishwasher

‐ Energy Star 1 7 0.02 15.00 $

APPLIANCES SUBTOTA L 1 7 0.02 15.00 $

Adjustments 20

‐ ‐ 0.08 $

Other 2

‐ ‐ 1,881.00 $

OTHER SUBTOTA L 22

‐ ‐ 1,881.08 $

Grand Total 901 222,761 2,890.56 365,818.49 $

Nonres E.A.

‐ Gas Page 21 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

COMMERCIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

COMMERCIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW THERMS THERMS INCENTIVE

COMPREHENSIVE MEASURE ELECTRIC ONLY Total 67 24,615,73 8 7,562.0 0

‐ ‐ 3,747,890.7 6 $

COMPREHENSIVE MEASURE GAS ONLY Total 42

‐ ‐ 451,66 8 5,799.0 0 723,415.2 4 $

COMPREHENSIVE MEASURES SUBTOTA L 109 24,615,73 8 7,562.0 0 451,66 8 5,799.0 0 4,471,306.0 0 $

DESIGN ASSISTANCE ELEC Total 287

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,251,531.2 3 $

DESIGN ASSISTANCE GAS Total 232

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 222,521.8 9 $

DESIGN ASSISTANCE MEASURES SUBTOTA L 519

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,474,053.1 2 $

Grand Total 628 24,615,73 8 7,562.0 0 451,66 8 5,799.0 0 5,945,359.1 2 $

Nonres N.C. Page 22 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

LOAD MANAGEMENT SUBTOTA L 149

‐ 192,899 $7,798,255.85

Grand Total 149

‐ 192,899 $7,798,255.85

Nonres L.M.

‐ Elec Page 23 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCE RECYCLING PROGRAM

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

RECYCLED REFRIGERATOR 3,297 3,111,999 1,358.69 164,850.00 $

RECYCLED FREEZER 757 717,402 311.96 37,850.00 $

RECYCLED WINDOW A/C 550 158,696 226.66 13,750.00 $

Grand Total 4,604 3,988,097 1,897.31 216,450.00 $

Res Recycling

‐ Elec Page 24 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL APPLIANCE RECYCLING PROGRAM

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

RECYCLED REFRIGERATOR 116 101,841 47.80 5,800.00 $

RECYCLED FREEZER 17 15,888 7.01 850.00 $

RECYCLED WINDOW A/C 34 7,432 14.01 850.00 $

Grand Total 167 125,161 68.82 7,500.00 $

Nonres Recycling

‐ Elec Page 25 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL LOW INCOME PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

LOW

‐ INCOME ACTIVITY Total 483 467,061 152.15 316,352.84 $

LOW INCOME KITS Total 1,316 469,812 26.06 39,249.70 $

Grand Total 1,799 936,873 178.20 355,602.54 $

Res L.I.

‐ Elec Page 26 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL LOW INCOME PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

LOW

‐ INCOME ACTIVITY Total 532 106,932 1,109.75 1,784,968.14 $

LOW INCOME KITS Total 1,316 34,479 102.78 39,249.70 $

Grand Total 1,848 141,411 1,212.53 1,824,217.84 $

Res L.I.

‐ Gas Page 27 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL LOW INCOME PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

Audit 1

‐ ‐ 207.19 $

Boilers and Controls 3 20,430 108.50 6,025.00 $

LED Exit Sign 58 5,082 0.50 465.52 $

Windows 138 80,110

‐ 14,914.16 $

Packaged Heat Pump 68 216,596 1,110.99 39,745.00 $

T

‐ 8 Lighting 50 15,768 1.80 2,500.00 $

Grand Total 318 337,986 1,221.79 63,856.87 $

Nonres L.I.

‐ Elec Page 28 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL LOW INCOME PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

Audit 1

‐ ‐ 36.56 $

Boilers and Controls 3 2,506 27.90 9,400.00 $

Grand Total 4 2,506 27.90 9,436.56 $

Nonres L.I.

‐ Gas Page 29 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 199

‐ ‐ 69,113.84 $

Packaged Air Conditioner 5 692 0.37 250.00 $

Room Air Conditioner 5 549 0.29 125.00 $

HVAC SUBTOTA L 10 1,241 0.66 375.00 $

Attic Insulation 25 19,681 0.47 14,231.75 $

Doors 11 1,576 3.83 87.40 $

Infiltration 1 18 0.01 31.50 $

Wall Insulation 1 30 0.00 85.00 $

Windows 82 3,907 11.31 682.26 $

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 120 25,212 15.63 15,117.91 $

LED Lighting 255 219,997 26.89 34,532.98 $

T

‐ 8 Lighting 65 1,758 0.34 1,755.00 $

LIGHTING MEASURES SUBTOTA L 320 221,755 27.22 36,287.98 $

CFL Direct Installed 42,818 3,991,526 730.68 204,169.64 $

Faucet Aerators 2,496 189,717 21.27 9,023.68 $

Pipe Insulation 50 555 0.07 207.00 $

Showerheads 1,388 524,275 58.72 19,237.68 $

DIRECT INSTALL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 46,752 4,706,072 810.73 232,638.00 $

Dishwasher

‐ Energy Star 1 86 0.01 5.00 $

Refrigerator 1 96 0.02 50.00 $

APPLIANCES/EQUIPMENT SUBTOTA L 2 182 0.03 55.00 $

Adjustments 3

‐ ‐ (1,307.31) $

OTHER MEASURES SUBTOTA L 3

‐ ‐ (1,307.31) $

Grand Total 47,406 4,954,462 854.27 352,280.42 $

Res M.F.

‐ Elec Page 30 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 95

‐ ‐ 25,055.48 $

Attic Insulation 33 3,418 43.60 26,570.11 $

Doors 10 203 0.49 833.66 $

Wall Insulation 1 60 0.80 37.45 $

Windows 35 371 1.12 1,483.91 $

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 79 4,052 46.01 28,925.13 $

Faucet Aerators 1,618 7,556 20.05 5,925.44 $

Pipe Insulation 87 177 0.47 360.18 $

Showerheads 828 20,912 55.45 11,476.08 $

DIRECT INSTALL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 2,533 28,644 75.97 17,761.70 $

Dishwasher

‐ Energy Star 1 8 0.03 15.00 $

APPLIANCES/EQUIPMENT SUBTOTA L 1 8 0.03 15.00 $

Adjustments 2

‐ ‐ (290.44) $

OTHER MEASURES SUBTOTA L 2

‐ ‐ (290.44) $

Grand Total 2,710 32,704 122.00 71,466.87 $

Res M.F.

‐ Gas Page 31 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 205

‐ ‐ 82,338.20 $

Air Source Heat Pump 3 1,643 0.38 1,200.00 $

Room Air Conditioner 2 128 0.07 50.00 $

HVAC MEASURES SUBTOTA L 5 1,771 0.45 1,250.00 $

Attic Insulation 28 18,434 0.46 7,765.17 $

Doors 18 14,499 33.92 255.31 $

Infiltration 2 24 0.01 143.85 $

Wall Insulation 2 4,866 0.00 700.92 $

Windows 281 66,549 182.00 12,191.32 $

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 331 104,372 216.39 21,056.57 $

CFL Self

‐ Installed 18,583 1,788,216 328.26 81,273.71 $

Induction Lighting 1 223,542 51.04 67,000.00 $

LED Lighting 198 138,034 16.92 11,773.30 $

Occupancy Sensors 11 5,033 0.99 220.00 $

T

‐ 8 Lighting 103 9,465 1.81 2,346.89 $

LIGHTING MEASURES SUBTOTA L 18,896 2,164,291 399.02 162,613.90 $

Faucet Aerator 713 52,627 5.93 2,602.24 $

Pipe Insulation 9 74 0.01 37.26 $

Showerheads 635 236,224 26.46 8,801.10 $

Sprayers 7 886 0.12 405.58 $

DIRECT INSTALL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 1,364 289,810 32.53 11,846.18 $

Dishwasher

‐ Energy Star 4 406 0.06 35.00 $

Freezer 2 152 0.03 50.00 $

Refrigerator 7 885 0.15 350.00 $

Refrigerator Vending Controls 4 4,560 0.72 733.04 $

APPLIANCES/EQUIPMENT SUBTOTA L 17 6,003 0.95 1,168.04 $

Adjustments 5

‐ ‐ (6,578.02) $

OTHER MEASURES SUBTOTA L 5

‐ ‐ (6,578.02) $

Grand Total 20,823 2,566,248 649.33 273,694.87 $

Nonres M.F.

‐ Elec Page 32 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 121

‐ ‐ 33,163.68 $

Boiler 13 5,432 42.90 7,295.20 $

Furnace 2 238 2.97 725.00 $

HVAC MEASURES SUBTOTA L 15 5,670 45.87 8,020.20 $

Attic Insulation 13 2,525 33.53 11,327.56 $

Doors 8 73 0.18 187.60 $

Infiltration 3 56 0.71 409.15 $

Wall Insulation 1 339 0.04 340.01 $

Windows 53 593 1.79 2,374.34 $

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 78 3,586 36.23 14,638.66 $

Faucet Aerator 3,651 15,900 42.33 13,185.28 $

Pipe Insulation 1 2 0.01 4.14 $

Showerheads 1,951 47,102 124.97 27,040.86 $

Sprayers 1 7 0.02 57.94 $

Thermostats 1 44 0.58 20.00 $

DIRECT INSTALL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 5,605 63,054 167.90 40,308.22 $

Dishwasher

‐ Energy Star 3 20 0.07 45.00 $

APPLIANCES/EQUIPMENT SUBTOTA L 3 20 0.07 45.00 $

Adjustments 5

‐ ‐ (3,792.18) $

Supplemental Payments 19

‐ ‐ 9,952.20 $

OTHER MEASURES SUBTOTA L 24

‐ ‐ 6,160.02 $

Grand Total 5,846 72,330 250.08 102,335.78 $

Nonres M.F.

‐ Gas Page 33 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 3

‐ ‐ 2,705.55 $

Above

‐ Decking Insulation 2 731 0.08 65.47 $

Sidewall Insulation 2 1,208 15.11 51.07 $

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 4 1,939 15.18 116.54 $

CFL Screw

‐ In 5 519 0.11 18.24 $

LED Lighting 10 3,251 1.08 1,234.00 $

Metal Halide Lighting 4 1,590 0.30 125.00 $

T

‐ 5 Lighting 206 72,492 13.19 10,622.00 $

T

‐ 8 Lighting 225 74,427 14.19 8,157.18 $

LIGHTING MEASURES SUBTOTA L 450 152,279 28.88 20,156.42 $

Grand Total 457 154,218 44.07 22,978.51 $

Res Ag

‐ Elec Page 34 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 3

‐ ‐ 2,705.55 $

Above

‐ Decking Insulation 2 446 0.59 261.87 $

Infiltration 1 11 0.14 507.50 $

Sidewall Insulation 2 442 0.24 204.29 $

Wall/Ceiling/Garage Door Insulation 1 266 1.60 600.00 $

Windows 1 8 0.02 30.40 $

BUILDING SHELL MEASURES SUBTOTA L 7 1,173 2.59 1,604.06 $

Grand Total 10 1,173 2.59 4,309.61 $

Res Ag

‐ Gas Page 35 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 40

‐ ‐ 34,991.72 $

Ground Source Heat Pump 1 8,410 2.29 2,290.00 $

HVAC SUBTOTA L 1 8,410 2.29 2,290.00 $

T

‐ 5 Hi Bay 48 13,610 2.60 3,228.00 $

CFL Screw In 441 39,704 9.34 1,798.70 $

LED Lighting 44 4,013 0.86 960.00 $

LIGHTING SUBTOTA L 533 57,327 12.79 5,986.70 $

Variable Speed Drive 12 89,012 4.61 3,525.00 $

MOTORS/DRIVES SUBTOTA L 12 89,012 4.61 3,525.00 $

Dishwasher

‐ Energy Star 1 192 0.03 20.00 $

Grain Dryer 1 3,765

‐ 709.27 $

Refrigerator 1 136 0.02 50.00 $

EQUIPMENT/APPLIANCE SUBTOTA L 3 4,093 0.05 779.27 $

Grand Total 589 158,842 19.74 47,572.69 $

Nonres Ag

‐ Elec Page 36 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

AUDITS SUBTOTA L 22

‐ ‐ 10,100.78 $

Furnace 1 159 1.99 325.00 $

Grain Dryer 1 6,299

‐ 15,841.73 $

EQUIPMENT SUBTOTA L 2 6,458 1.99 16,166.73 $

Grand Total 24 6,458 1.99 26,267.51 $

Nonres Ag

‐ Gas Page 37 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

RESIDENTIAL THIRD PARTY PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

HOME ENERGY REPORT SUBTOTA L 45,234 10,124,316 2,754.76

‐ $

Grand Total

‐ Electric 45,234 10,124,316 2,754.76

‐ $

RESIDENTIAL THIRD PARTY PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

HOME ENERGY REPORT SUBTOTA L 45,234 350,071 4,795.49

‐ $

Grand Total

‐ Gas 45,234 350,071 4,795.49

‐ $

Res 3rd Party Page 38 of 39 Exhibit A

# MidAmerican Energy Company

EEP

‐ 08

‐ 2

Measure Level Statistics by Program

NONRESIDENTIAL THIRD PARTY PROGRAM

‐ ELECTRIC MEASURE S

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL kWH PEAK kW INCENTIVE

Building Tune

‐ Up 6 151,646

‐ 25,457.46 $

Money for Motors 61

‐ ‐ 4,721.50 $

Solid

‐ State Lighting 409 166,009 39.52 19,750.00 $

3rd PARTY ELECTRIC SUBTOTAL 476 317,655 39.52 49,928.96 $

Grand Total

‐ Electric 476 317,655 39.52 49,928.96 $

NONRESIDENTIAL THIRD PARTY PROGRAM

‐ GAS MEASURES

MEASURE DESCRIPTION UNITS ANNUAL THERMS PEAK THERMS INCENTIVE

Building Tune

‐ Up 6 5,258

‐ 28,390.84 $

3rd PARTY GAS SUBTOTAL 6 5,258

‐ 28,390.84 $

Grand Total

‐ Gas 6 5,258

‐ 28,390.84 $

Nonres 3rd Party Page 39 of 39 Exhibit AMeterLevel GenrLevel MeterLevel GenrLevelBudget Actual Actual Percentage Budget Actual Actual Percentage Budget Actual PercentageProgramNameUnits kWh kWh kWh Variance Difference kW kW kW Variance Difference Expenses Expenses Variance DifferenceResidentialEquipment 1,268,39659,857,15872,008,82776,458,72516,601,56728% 10,64513,34614,4663,82136% 7,025,000$6,054,829$(970,171)$‐14%ResidentialAudit 44,0994,681,7524,014,3664,262,440(419,312)‐9% 1,6801,1131,206(474)‐28% 1,436,000$1,449,559$13,559$1%ResidentialNewConstruction 7,8296,511,5006,414,2266,810,603299,1035% 3,6633,9704,30364017% 2,935,000$2,014,842$(920,158)$‐31%ResidentialLoadManagement60,572867,2121,935,6452,098,0331,230,821142% 52,67366,91872,53219,85938% 4,219,000$4,348,263$129,263$3%CriticalPeakPricing‐2,610‐‐(2,610)‐100% 62‐‐(62)‐100% 279,000$‐$(279,000)$‐100%NonresidentialEquipment 93,20692,131,82747,597,01850,538,350(41,593,477)‐45% 18,0517,4288,052(9,999)‐55% 3,914,000$3,552,207$(361,793)$‐9%NonresidentialCustom 25,4937,827,73011,238,22711,932,7104,104,98052% 1,2441,8582,01477062% 1,226,000$1,864,623$638,623$52%EfficiencyBid‐18,403,200‐‐(18,403,200)‐100% 2,360‐‐(2,360)‐100% 1,224,000$9,434$(1,214,566)$‐99%SmallCommercialEnergyAudit47,3453,663,8668,515,1409,041,3465,377,480147% 9201,8912,0491,129123% 1,156,000$1,895,868$739,868$64%NonresidentialEnergyAnalysis 8,42633,812,40528,463,42729,115,617(4,696,788)‐14% 6,1412,9593,145(2,996)‐49% 3,467,000$5,724,204$2,257,204$65%CommercialNewConstruction 35450,321,12724,615,73826,136,906(24,184,221)‐48% 7,8727,5628,1963244% 7,160,000$7,764,697$604,697$8%NonresidentialLoadManagement1496,710,880‐‐(6,710,880)‐100% 179,848192,899205,03725,18914% 10,360,000$8,324,380$(2,035,620)$‐20%ApplianceRecycling‐Residential 4,60412,598,3693,988,0974,234,548(8,363,821)‐66% 3,8021,8972,056(1,746)‐46% 1,131,211$779,098$(352,113)$‐31%ApplianceRecycling‐Nonresidential 167621,326125,161132,896(488,430)‐79% 1536975(78)‐51% 55,789$120,729$64,940$116%LowIncome‐Residential 1,7991,857,390936,873994,769(862,621)‐46% 418178193(225)‐54% 928,122$420,504$(507,618)$‐55%LowIncome‐Nonresidential 318583,333337,986358,872(224,461)‐38% 1141,2221,3241,2101062% 49,878$65,348$15,470$31%Multifamily‐Residential 47,406586,2234,954,4625,260,6304,674,407797% 114854926812712% 145,137$465,148$320,011$220%Multifamily‐Nonresidential 20,823237,1242,566,2482,724,8332,487,7091049% 109649704595546% 157,863$367,900$210,037$133%Agriculture‐Residential 45724,212154,218163,748139,536576% 44448441094% 41,987$79,470$37,483$89%Agriculture‐Nonresidential 589648,333158,842168,657(479,676)‐74% 672021(46)‐68% 305,013$128,441$(176,572)$‐58%ThirdParty‐Residential 45,2341,094,51510,124,31610,749,9649,655,449882% 1842,7552,9862,8021523% 266,668$291,345$24,677$9%ThirdParty‐Nonresidential 4765,579,359317,655337,285(5,242,074)‐94% 1,1644043(1,121)‐96% 1,369,332$80,199$(1,289,133)$‐94%Education‐Residential‐‐‐‐‐0%‐‐‐‐0% 1,133,339$959,365$(173,974)$‐15%Education‐Nonresidential‐‐‐‐‐0%‐‐‐‐0% 1,637,661$1,436,468$(201,193)$‐12%Trees‐‐‐‐‐0%‐‐‐‐0% 318,000$223,292$(94,708)$‐30%Assessments‐‐‐‐‐0%‐‐‐‐0% 1,310,000$1,328,014$18,014$1%Total 1,677,742308,621,451228,466,471241,520,933(67,100,518)‐22% 291,288307,672333,48442,19614% 53,251,000$49,748,227$(3,502,773)$‐7%MeterLevel GenrLevel MeterLevel GenrLevelBudget Actual Actual Percentage Budget Actual Actual Percentage Budget Actual PercentageCustomerClass Units kWh kWh kWh Variance Difference kW kW kW Variance Difference Expenses Expenses Variance DifferenceResidential 1,480,39688,080,941104,531,030111,033,45922,952,51826% 73,24591,07698,71625,47135% 19,540,464$16,862,423$(2,678,041)$‐14%Nonresidential 197,346220,540,510123,935,441130,487,473(90,053,037)‐41% 218,043216,597230,66112,6186% 32,082,536$31,334,498$(748,038)$‐2%Other‐‐‐‐‐0%‐‐‐‐0% 1,628,000$1,551,306$(76,694)$‐5%Total 1,677,742308,621,451228,466,471241,520,933(67,100,518)‐22% 291,288307,672329,37738,08913% 53,251,000$49,748,227$(3,502,773)$‐7%MidAmericanEnergyCompanyEEP‐08‐22012Participation,Actual&PlannedEnergySavings,CapacitySavings,andExpenditures‐ElectricProgramsPage 1 of 2Exhibit BPlanned Actual Planned ActualAnnual Annual Percent Peak Peak Percent Planned Actual PercentProgramName Units Therms Therms Variance Difference Therms Therms Variance Difference Expenses Expenses Variance DifferenceResidentialEquipment 29,2011,558,5741,164,080(394,494)‐25% 15,71713,443(2,274)‐14% 5,197,000$4,832,409$(364,591)$‐7%ResidentialAudit 20,822756,230419,497(336,733)‐45% 6,7384,929(1,809)‐27% 3,944,000$3,413,981$(530,019)$‐13%ResidentialNewConstruction 6,609859,614959,33199,71712% 9,45521,29911,844125% 4,698,000$3,383,949$(1,314,051)$‐28%NonresidentialEquipment 839221,046114,960(106,086)‐48% 2,0631,230(833)‐40% 392,000$357,328$(34,672)$‐9%NonresidentialCustom 2,961110,311251,474141,163128% 1,0221,67365164% 410,000$556,332$146,332$36%SmallCommercialEnergyAudit 3,417115,479111,248(4,231)‐4% 1,2011,091(110)‐9% 906,000$486,632$(419,368)$‐46%NonresidentialEnergyAnalysis 90198,000222,761124,761127% 1282,8912,7632158% 164,000$482,192$318,192$194%CommercialNewConstruction 274822,114451,668(370,446)‐45% 5,2835,79951610% 1,889,000$1,785,595$(103,405)$‐5%LowIncome‐Residential 1,848266,183141,411(124,772)‐47% 2,2461,213(1,033)‐46% 1,806,480$2,247,272$440,792$24%LowIncome‐Nonresidential 49,3692,506(6,863)‐73% 4628(18)‐39% 123,520$9,598$(113,922)$‐92%Multifamily‐Residential 2,71040,10732,704(7,403)‐18% 189122(67)‐35% 389,820$71,165$(318,655)$‐82%Multifamily‐Nonresidential 5,84649,41772,33022,91346% 567250(317)‐56% 705,180$242,804$(462,376)$‐66%Agriculture‐Residential 10‐1,1731,1730%‐330%‐$4,507$4,507$0%Agriculture‐Nonresidential 24‐6,4586,4580%‐220%‐$27,938$27,938$0%ThirdParty‐Residential 45,234294,311350,07155,76019% 2,0424,7952,753135% 923,769$292,506$(631,263)$‐68%ThirdParty‐Nonresidential 650,7195,258(45,461)‐90% 1,670‐(1,670)‐100% 1,029,231$32,180$(997,051)$‐97%Education‐Residential‐‐‐‐0%‐‐‐0% 1,302,000$1,207,917$(94,083)$‐7%Education‐Nonresidential‐‐‐‐0%‐‐‐0% 558,000$399,609$(158,391)$‐28%Trees‐‐‐‐0%‐‐‐0% 290,000$222,173$(67,827)$‐23%Assessments‐‐‐‐0%‐‐‐0% 778,000$708,709$(69,291)$‐9%Total 120,7065,251,4744,306,931(944,543)‐18% 48,36758,76610,39922% 25,506,000$20,764,796$(4,741,204)$‐19%Budget Actual Budget ActualAnnual Annual Percent Peak Peak Percent Budget Actual PercentCustomerClass Units Therms Therms Variance Difference Therms Therms Variance Difference Expenses Expenses Variance DifferenceResidential 106,4343,775,0193,068,267(706,752)‐19% 36,38745,8039,41626% 18,261,069$15,453,706$(2,807,363)$‐15%Nonresidential 14,2721,476,4551,238,664(237,791)‐16% 11,98012,9649848% 6,176,931$4,380,208$(1,796,723)$‐29%Other‐‐‐‐0%‐‐‐0% 1,068,000$930,882$(137,118)$‐13%Total 120,7065,251,4744,306,931(944,543)‐18% 48,36758,76610,39922% 25,506,000$20,764,796$(4,741,204)$‐19%MidAmericanEnergyCompanyEEP‐08‐22012Participation,Actual&PlannedEnergySavings,CapacitySavings,andExpenditures‐GasProgramsPage 2 of 2Exhibit BPlan Actual Variance %VarianceResidentialEquipment 12,222,000$10,887,238$(1,334,762)$‐10.92%ResidentialAudit 5,380,000$4,863,540$(516,460)$‐9.60%ResidentialNewConstruction 7,633,000$5,398,791$(2,234,209)$‐29.27%ResidentialLoadManagement 4,219,000$4,348,263$129,263$3.06%Critical‐PeakPricing 279,000$‐$(279,000)$‐100.00%NonresidentialEquipment 4,306,000$3,909,535$(396,465)$‐9.21%NonresidentialCustom 1,636,000$2,420,955$784,955$47.98%EfficiencyBid 1,224,000$9,434$(1,214,566)$‐99.23%SmallCommercialEnergyAudit 2,062,000$2,382,500$320,500$15.54%NonresidentialEnergyAnalysis 3,631,000$6,206,396$2,575,396$70.93%CommercialNewConstruction 9,049,000$9,550,292$501,292$5.54%NonresidentialLoadManagement 10,360,000$8,324,380$(2,035,620)$‐19.65%ApplianceRecycling 1,187,000$899,827$(287,173)$‐24.19%LowIncome 2,908,000$2,742,722$(165,278)$‐5.68%Multifamily 1,398,000$1,147,017$(250,983)$‐17.95%Agriculture 347,000$240,356$(106,644)$‐30.73%ThirdParty 3,589,000$696,230$(2,892,770)$‐80.60%Education 4,631,000$4,003,359$(627,641)$‐13.55%Trees 608,000$445,465$(162,535)$‐26.73%Assessments 2,088,000$2,036,723$(51,277)$‐2.46%78,757,000$70,513,023$(8,243,977)$‐10.47%EEP‐08‐22012ActualandPlannedSpendingMidAmericanEnergyCompanyPage 1 of 1 Exhibit CTotalPlanning Advertising Customer Monitoring Non‐Incentive&Design Administration&Promotion Incentives&Evaluation Equipment Installation Miscellaneous Total CostsResidentialEquipment 13,020$1,659,128$231,254$8,496,100$486,077$‐$1,658$‐$10,887,238$2,391,138$ResidentialAudit 6,083$915,110$100,774$3,662,786$177,978$‐$808$‐$4,863,540$1,200,754$ResidentialNewConstruction 6,340$708,727$67,062$4,464,267$151,564$‐$832$‐$5,398,791$934,524$ResidentialLoadManagement4,222$977,073$48,553$2,078,793$106,245$‐$869,019$264,357$4,348,263$2,269,470$CriticalPeakPricing‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$NonresidentialEquipment 5,079$268,662$101,371$3,341,819$191,997$‐$607$‐$3,909,536$567,717$NonresidentialCustom 2,522$529,427$15,606$1,740,426$132,662$‐$312$‐$2,420,955$680,529$EfficiencyBid 9$3,237$4,282$‐$1,905$‐$1$‐$9,434$9,434$SmallCommercialEnergyAudit 2,332$236,883$14,218$1,985,973$142,807$‐$287$‐$2,382,500$396,527$NonresidentialEnergyAnalysis 5,813$1,020,413$35,613$4,726,944$416,916$‐$698$‐$6,206,396$1,479,453$CommercialNewConstruction 28,160$1,312,900$321,342$5,945,359$1,939,048$‐$3,482$‐$9,550,291$3,604,932$NonresidentialLoadManagement8,082$254,170$19,900$7,798,256$243,015$‐$957$‐$8,324,380$526,124$ApplianceRecycling877$462,052$112,387$223,950$100,458$‐$103$‐$899,827$675,877$LowIncome3,945$431,131$8,456$2,253,114$45,541$‐$535$‐$2,742,721$489,608$Multifamily1,282$218,212$9,537$799,778$118,049$‐$159$‐$1,147,017$347,239$Agriculture239$53,384$13,235$101,128$72,341$‐$29$‐$240,355$139,227$ThirdParty 3,684$614,002$224$78,320$‐$‐$‐$‐$696,230$617,910$Education4,409$368,887$3,543,148$22,750$63,604$‐$560$‐$4,003,359$3,980,609$Trees‐$14,970$66,135$364,360$‐$‐$‐$‐$445,465$81,105$Assessments‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$2,036,723$‐$‐$2,036,723$2,036,723$96,099$10,048,367$4,713,098$48,084,121$4,390,207$2,036,723$880,049$264,357$70,513,021$22,428,900$MidAmericanEnergyCompanyEEP‐08‐22012ExpendituresbyCostCategory‐TotalProgramPage 1 of 3Exhibit DTotalPlanning Advertising Customer Monitoring Non‐Incentive&Design Administration&Promotion Incentives&Evaluation Equipment Installation Miscellaneous Total CostsResidentialEquipment 6,645$1,023,477$183,512$4,600,964$239,447$‐$783$‐$6,054,829$1,453,864$ResidentialAudit 1,391$255,196$28,267$1,116,679$47,863$‐$164$‐$1,449,559$332,881$ResidentialNewConstruction 1,989$278,939$25,515$1,655,622$52,543$‐$234$‐$2,014,842$359,220$ResidentialLoadManagement 4,222$977,073$48,553$2,078,793$106,245$‐$869,019$264,357$4,348,263$2,269,470$Critical‐PeakPricing‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$NonresidentialEquipment 4,627$216,958$92,614$3,078,586$158,877$‐$545$‐$3,552,207$473,622$NonresidentialCustom 1,804$401,915$12,514$1,344,953$103,225$‐$213$‐$1,864,623$519,670$EfficiencyBid 9$3,237$4,282$‐$1,905$‐$1$‐$9,434$9,434$SmallCommercialEnergyAudit 1,723$167,658$10,552$1,627,518$88,214$‐$203$‐$1,895,868$268,350$NonresidentialEnergyAnalysis 5,157$922,538$32,439$4,361,125$402,337$‐$608$‐$5,724,204$1,363,079$CommercialNewConstruction 19,905$986,705$258,607$4,999,422$1,497,712$‐$2,345$‐$7,764,697$2,765,275$NonresidentialLoadManagement 8,082$254,170$19,900$7,798,256$243,015$‐$957$‐$8,324,380$526,124$ApplianceRecycling 877$462,052$112,387$223,950$100,458$‐$103$‐$899,827$675,877$LowIncome 468$60,218$988$419,459$4,663$‐$55$‐$485,852$66,392$Multifamily 864$137,494$6,323$625,975$62,289$‐$102$‐$833,048$207,073$Agriculture 203$51,978$13,151$70,551$72,003$‐$24$‐$207,910$137,359$ThirdParty 2,196$319,195$224$49,929$‐$‐$‐$‐$371,544$321,615$Education 2,324$158,185$2,173,321$21,550$40,179$‐$274$‐$2,395,833$2,374,283$Trees‐$7,499$33,068$182,725$‐$‐$‐$‐$223,292$40,567$Assessments‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$1,328,014$‐$‐$1,328,014$1,328,014$62,486$6,684,486$3,056,218$34,256,056$3,220,977$1,328,014$875,629$264,357$49,748,225$15,492,169$MidAmericanEnergyCompanyEEP‐08‐22012ExpendituresbyCostCategory‐ElectricProgramsPage 2 of 3Exhibit DTotalPlanning Advertising Customer Monitoring Total Non‐Incentive&Design Administration&Promotion Incentives&Evaluation Equipment Installation Miscellaneous Costs CostsResidentialEquipment6,375$635,651$47,742$3,895,135$246,630$‐$876$‐$4,832,409$937,273$ResidentialAudit 4,693$659,914$72,507$2,546,107$130,115$‐$645$‐$3,413,981$867,874$ResidentialNewConstruction 4,351$429,788$41,547$2,808,645$99,020$‐$598$‐$3,383,949$575,304$NonresidentialEquipment452$51,704$8,757$263,233$33,119$‐$62$‐$357,328$94,095$NonresidentialCustom 719$127,513$3,092$395,473$29,436$‐$99$‐$556,332$160,859$SmallCommercialEnergyAudit 609$69,225$3,666$358,455$54,593$‐$84$‐$486,632$128,177$NonresidentialEnergyAnalysis656$97,875$3,174$365,818$14,578$‐$90$‐$482,192$116,374$CommercialNewConstruction 8,255$326,195$62,735$945,937$441,336$‐$1,137$‐$1,785,595$839,658$LowIncome 3,477$370,913$7,468$1,833,654$40,878$‐$480$‐$2,256,870$423,215$Multifamily 417$80,718$3,214$173,803$55,760$‐$57$‐$313,969$140,166$Agriculture 36$1,405$84$30,577$338$‐$5$‐$32,445$1,868$ThirdParty 1,488$294,808$‐$28,391$‐$‐$‐$‐$324,686$296,295$Education 2,085$210,701$1,369,827$1,200$23,426$‐$287$‐$1,607,526$1,606,326$Trees‐$7,471$33,068$181,635$‐$‐$‐$‐$222,173$40,538$Assessments‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$708,709$‐$‐$708,709$708,709$33,612$3,363,881$1,656,880$13,828,065$1,169,230$708,709$4,419$‐$20,764,796$6,936,731$MidAmericanEnergyCompanyEEP‐08‐22012ExpendituresbyCostCategory‐GasProgramsPage 3 of 3Exhibit DRatepayer TotalParticipant Impact Utility Resource SocietalProgram Test Test Test Test TestResidentialEquipment 1.480.713.411.031.29ResidentialAudit 1.680.571.340.891.22ResidentialNewConstruction 1.330.813.301.071.45NonresidentialEquipment 1.101.357.651.471.91NonresidentialCustom 2.460.743.651.682.17EfficiencyBid‐‐‐‐‐SmallCommercialEnergyAudit 1.530.722.551.081.39NonresidentialEnergyAnalysis 1.261.072.951.321.75CommercialNewConstruction 1.830.892.251.441.91ApplianceRecycling‐Residential 3.180.531.451.071.25ApplianceRecycling‐Nonresidential 1.740.260.310.290.33LowIncome‐Residential 1.880.370.650.640.85LowIncome‐Nonresidential 1.751.034.121.802.54Multifamily‐Residential 5.670.754.973.704.58Multifamily‐Nonresidential 1.380.813.791.101.41Agriculture‐Residential 1.330.501.150.610.78Agriculture‐Nonresidential 1.010.530.960.530.70ThirdParty‐Residential 2.550.561.680.951.03ThirdParty‐Nonresidential 0.490.791.940.410.53Total 1.490.843.051.211.58Ratepayer TotalParticipant Impact Utility Resource SocietalProgram Test Test Test Test TestResidentialLoadManagement‐1.251.302.362.60NonresidentialLoadManagement‐1.971.9727.9830.79Total‐1.711.737.187.91MidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Benefit/Cost Statistics - Total (Gas and Electric Non-Curtailment)2012 Benefit/Cost Statistics - Total Electric CurtailmentPage1of6 ExhibitERatepayer TotalParticipant Impact Utility Resource SocietalProgram Test Test Test Test TestResidentialEquipment 2.150.754.361.541.87ResidentialAudit 1.630.671.501.031.33ResidentialNewConstruction 1.231.023.901.251.72NonresidentialEquipment 1.261.408.121.752.26NonresidentialCustom 2.430.753.571.682.16EfficiencyBid‐‐‐‐‐SmallCommercialEnergyAudit 1.780.752.631.291.63NonresidentialEnergyAnalysis 1.291.122.881.411.87CommercialNewConstruction 1.520.982.221.381.81ApplianceRecycling‐Residential 3.180.531.451.071.25ApplianceRecycling‐Nonresidential 1.740.260.310.290.33LowIncome‐Residential 2.470.521.181.171.51LowIncome‐Nonresidential 2.171.084.332.343.30Multifamily‐Residential 6.230.765.274.004.94Multifamily‐Nonresidential 1.430.833.921.161.47Agriculture‐Residential 1.290.491.060.570.72Agriculture‐Nonresidential 1.210.500.730.550.72ThirdParty‐Residential 3.470.612.271.281.41ThirdParty‐Nonresidential 0.360.912.220.370.47Total 1.650.943.551.491.91Ratepayer TotalParticipant Impact Utility Resource SocietalProgram Test Test Test Test TestResidentialLoadManagement‐1.251.302.362.60NonresidentialLoadManagement‐1.971.9727.9830.79Total‐1.711.737.187.91MidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Benefit/Cost Statistics - Electric Programs (Non-Curtailment)2012 Benefit/Cost Statistics - Total Electric CurtailmentPage2of6 ExhibitERatepayer TotalParticipant Impact Utility Resource SocietalProgram Test Test Test Test TestResidentialEquipment 0.890.642.230.570.76ResidentialAudit 1.700.531.280.841.17ResidentialNewConstruction 1.390.692.940.951.29NonresidentialEquipment 0.400.683.020.280.38NonresidentialCustom 2.540.723.941.682.23SmallCommercialEnergyAudit 0.990.632.250.620.86NonresidentialEnergyAnalysis 1.130.763.770.851.10CommercialNewConstruction 3.720.632.361.742.38LowIncome‐Residential 1.770.340.540.540.73LowIncome‐Nonresidential 0.750.692.710.520.70Multifamily‐Residential 3.010.673.012.012.53Multifamily‐Nonresidential 3.150.581.921.331.66Agriculture‐Residential 1.590.642.801.011.44Agriculture‐Nonresidential 0.850.592.050.500.69ThirdParty‐Residential 1.630.481.090.610.66ThirdParty‐Nonresidential 1.860.501.240.881.14Total 1.250.622.080.771.03MidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Benefit/Cost Statistics - Gas ProgramsPage3of6 ExhibitEAvoided AvoidedBill Energy‐Capacity Energy‐CapacityAdministrative Incentives Incremental Savings Costs Costs ExternalitiesProgram Costs Paid Investment (NPV‐PRT) (NPV‐PRT) (NPV‐SOC) (NPV‐SOC)ResidentialEquipment 2,391,137$8,496,100$33,624,273$41,176,003$37,163,645$42,361,800$4,072,863$ResidentialAudit 1,200,755$3,662,786$6,123,093$6,645,385$6,530,306$8,228,202$681,149$ResidentialNewConstruction 934,524$4,464,267$15,779,730$16,595,605$17,806,004$22,359,025$1,921,871$NonresidentialEquipment 567,717$3,341,819$19,716,487$18,312,052$29,919,045$35,211,901$3,487,036$NonresidentialCustom 680,529$1,740,426$4,579,935$9,521,810$8,842,513$10,462,378$978,892$EfficiencyBid 9,434$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$SmallCommercialEnergyAudit 396,527$1,985,973$5,242,885$6,026,872$6,082,259$7,134,808$678,107$NonresidentialEnergyAnalysis 1,479,453$4,726,944$12,385,257$10,921,606$18,323,317$22,074,922$2,152,949$CommercialNewConstruction 3,604,933$5,945,359$11,289,893$14,679,934$21,474,697$25,922,508$2,458,902$ApplianceRecycling‐Residential 562,648$216,450$489,682$1,340,118$1,128,136$1,191,303$119,130$ApplianceRecycling‐Nonresidential 113,229$7,500$16,781$21,748$37,091$39,168$3,917$LowIncome‐Residential 487,955$2,179,820$2,186,861$1,934,956$1,722,289$2,105,393$172,454$LowIncome‐Nonresidential 1,653$73,293$169,381$223,407$308,685$395,234$38,702$Multifamily‐Residential 112,566$423,747$606,976$3,015,199$2,663,992$3,002,994$294,011$Multifamily‐Nonresidential 95,875$299,962$1,265,485$1,448,074$1,500,368$1,743,605$172,542$Agriculture‐Residential 56,688$27,288$102,046$108,359$96,668$112,556$10,835$Agriculture‐Nonresidential 82,538$73,840$201,060$128,635$150,509$183,387$16,520$ThirdParty‐Residential 583,851$‐$452,340$1,152,783$980,100$980,100$90,045$ThirdParty‐Nonresidential 34,060$78,320$496,072$163,514$217,974$255,874$24,395$Total 12,778,161$37,665,575$113,779,825$132,099,763$153,749,525$182,529,185$17,259,879$MidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Benefit/Cost Input Data - Total (Gas and Electric Non-Curtailment)Page4of6 ExhibitEAvoided AvoidedBill Energy‐Capacity Energy‐CapacityAdministrative Incentives Incremental Savings Costs Costs ExternalitiesProgram Costs Paid Investment (NPV‐PRT) (NPV‐PRT) (NPV‐SOC) (NPV‐SOC)ResidentialEquipment 1,453,864$4,600,964$15,686,768$29,100,638$26,373,555$29,133,507$2,913,351$ResidentialAudit 332,881$1,116,679$1,781,450$1,794,849$2,177,286$2,561,354$256,135$ResidentialNewConstruction 359,220$1,655,622$5,918,743$5,652,978$7,854,080$9,797,759$979,776$NonresidentialEquipment 473,622$3,078,586$15,981,705$17,072,721$28,838,264$33,845,718$3,384,572$NonresidentialCustom 519,670$1,344,953$3,439,620$7,016,418$6,652,060$7,768,547$776,855$EfficiencyBid 9,434$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$SmallCommercialEnergyAudit 268,350$1,627,518$3,601,838$4,767,015$4,985,592$5,719,870$571,987$NonresidentialEnergyAnalysis 1,363,079$4,361,125$10,364,971$8,998,251$16,505,174$19,893,183$1,989,318$CommercialNewConstruction 2,765,275$4,999,422$9,716,884$9,781,734$17,268,235$20,588,542$2,058,854$ApplianceRecycling‐Residential 562,648$216,450$489,682$1,340,118$1,128,136$1,191,303$119,130$ApplianceRecycling‐Nonresidential 113,229$7,500$16,781$21,748$37,091$39,168$3,917$LowIncome‐Residential 64,901$355,603$359,123$532,419$497,991$581,987$58,199$LowIncome‐Nonresidential 1,491$63,857$119,250$195,312$282,699$362,361$36,236$Multifamily‐Residential 112,868$352,280$499,871$2,764,161$2,449,625$2,751,475$275,148$Multifamily‐Nonresidential 94,205$273,695$1,153,126$1,378,984$1,443,026$1,670,857$167,086$Agriculture‐Residential 56,491$22,979$89,696$93,090$84,031$95,717$9,572$Agriculture‐Nonresidential 80,868$47,573$88,700$59,546$93,166$110,639$11,064$ThirdParty‐Residential 291,345$‐$226,170$784,771$661,504$661,504$66,150$ThirdParty‐Nonresidential 30,270$49,929$454,849$115,364$178,206$208,175$20,818$Total 8,953,711$24,174,733$69,989,227$91,470,117$117,509,723$136,981,666$13,698,167$MidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Benefit/Cost Input Data - Electric Programs (Non-Curtailment)Page5of6 ExhibitEAvoided AvoidedBill Energy‐Capacity Energy‐CapacityAdministrative Incentives Incremental Savings Costs Costs ExternalitiesProgram Costs Paid Investment (NPV‐PRT) (NPV‐PRT) (NPV‐SOC) (NPV‐SOC)ResidentialEquipment 937,273$3,895,135$17,937,505$12,075,365$10,790,090$13,228,293$1,159,513$ResidentialAudit 867,874$2,546,107$4,341,644$4,850,536$4,353,020$5,666,848$425,014$ResidentialNewConstruction 575,304$2,808,645$9,860,987$10,942,627$9,951,924$12,561,266$942,095$NonresidentialEquipment 94,095$263,233$3,734,782$1,239,331$1,080,781$1,366,183$102,464$NonresidentialCustom 160,859$395,473$1,140,315$2,505,393$2,190,453$2,693,832$202,037$SmallCommercialEnergyAudit 128,177$358,455$1,641,047$1,259,857$1,096,667$1,414,938$106,120$NonresidentialEnergyAnalysis 116,374$365,818$2,020,286$1,923,355$1,818,142$2,181,739$163,630$CommercialNewConstruction 839,658$945,937$1,573,009$4,898,200$4,206,462$5,333,966$400,047$LowIncome‐Residential 423,054$1,824,218$1,827,738$1,402,537$1,224,299$1,523,406$114,255$LowIncome‐Nonresidential 161$9,437$50,131$28,095$25,986$32,873$2,465$Multifamily‐Residential (302)$71,467$107,105$251,038$214,367$251,519$18,864$Multifamily‐Nonresidential 140,469$102,336$210,992$563,284$466,031$541,955$40,647$Agriculture‐Residential 197$4,310$12,350$15,269$12,636$16,840$1,263$Agriculture‐Nonresidential 1,671$26,268$112,360$69,089$57,342$72,748$5,456$ThirdParty‐Residential 292,506$‐$226,170$368,012$318,595$318,595$23,895$ThirdParty‐Nonresidential 3,789$28,391$41,223$48,150$39,768$47,699$3,577$Total 4,581,159$13,645,230$44,837,642$42,440,138$37,846,565$47,252,699$3,711,343$MidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Benefit/Cost Input Data - Gas ProgramsPage6of6 ExhibitEMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Energy ProgramsTotal Administrative Cost: 8,953,711$Total Participant Cost: 69,989,227$Total Incentives Paid: 24,174,733$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 115,644,850$ 117,509,723$ 117,509,723$ 117,509,723$ 150,679,833$Total Costs 69,989,227$ 124,598,561$ 33,128,444$ 78,942,938$ 78,942,938$Net Benefits 45,655,623$ (7,088,838)$ 84,381,279$ 38,566,785$ 71,736,895$B/C Ratio 1.650.943.551.491.91Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 42.40$ 75.48$ 20.07$ 47.82$ 41.75$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 239,422.90051.8082,445,497$ 376,745$ 1,294,556$ 10,107,603$ 13,506,671$ 1,422,440$2 228,672.93648.8222,369,678$ 365,065$ 1,247,242$ 10,692,329$ 12,721,900$ 1,467,431$3 228,672.93648.8222,419,441$ 372,731$ 1,273,434$ 10,924,348$ 12,721,900$ 1,498,995$4 228,443.28248.5532,457,493$ 378,593$ 1,292,773$ 11,292,695$ 12,991,517$ 1,542,155$5 228,443.28248.5532,509,100$ 386,544$ 1,319,922$ 11,275,339$ 13,283,826$ 1,549,090$6 155,265.62235.1131,787,146$ 275,322$ 891,463$ 8,200,123$ 7,842,859$ 1,115,405$7 155,265.62235.1131,824,676$ 281,103$ 910,184$ 8,569,268$ 8,019,324$ 1,158,523$8 155,265.62235.1131,862,994$ 287,007$ 929,298$ 8,884,950$ 8,199,758$ 1,196,425$9 155,265.62235.1131,902,117$ 293,034$ 948,813$ 9,126,537$ 8,384,253$ 1,227,050$10 135,760.08931.3271,677,409$ 258,416$ 820,790$ 8,373,928$ 7,333,247$ 1,113,054$11 102,003.98024.8981,255,244$ 193,379$ 589,338$ 6,443,545$ 5,406,685$ 848,151$12 99,208.27724.5731,259,715$ 194,068$ 589,724$ 6,490,501$ 5,276,893$ 853,401$13 99,072.06324.5541,284,859$ 197,941$ 601,281$ 6,893,650$ 5,383,240$ 897,773$14 96,654.54524.2051,287,022$ 198,274$ 599,287$ 7,055,985$ 5,288,295$ 914,057$15 70,227.44815.995954,210$ 147,002$ 407,358$ 5,286,936$ 4,067,458$ 679,551$16 10,972.3445.506215,779$ 33,242$ 119,220$ 904,961$ 987,897$ 127,320$17 10,964.4145.504220,201$ 33,923$ 121,681$ 924,379$ 1,009,687$ 130,018$18 10,964.4145.504224,825$ 34,636$ 124,236$ 980,757$ 1,032,405$ 136,445$19 3,624.9192.321145,578$ 22,427$ 79,713$ 383,297$ 322,309$ 63,102$20 3,624.9192.321148,636$ 22,898$ 81,387$ 398,054$ 329,561$ 65,097$21 1,795.2291.43470,035$ 10,789$ 38,317$ 203,868$ 179,487$ 32,301$22 1,795.2291.43471,506$ 11,016$ 39,121$ 211,717$ 183,525$ 33,336$23 1,795.2291.43473,008$ 11,247$ 39,943$ 219,869$ 187,654$ 34,407$24 1,795.2291.43474,541$ 11,484$ 40,781$ 228,334$ 191,876$ 35,514$25 1,795.2291.43476,106$ 11,725$ 41,638$ 237,124$ 196,194$ 36,659$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 1,650,765.609369.32018,674,375$ 2,876,912$ 9,531,033$ 86,427,403$ 91,470,117$ 11,750,972$NPV - SOC 1,890,648.252427.31921,683,539$ 3,340,494$ 11,019,682$ 100,937,951$ 104,837,630$ 13,698,167$Page1of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Residential EquipmentTotal Administrative Cost: 1,453,864$Total Participant Cost: 15,686,768$Total Incentives Paid: 4,600,964$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 33,701,602$ 26,373,555$ 26,373,555$ 26,373,555$ 32,046,857$Total Costs 15,686,768$ 35,155,466$ 6,054,828$ 17,140,632$ 17,140,632$Net Benefits 18,014,834$ (8,781,911)$ 20,318,727$ 9,232,923$ 14,906,225$B/C Ratio 2.150.754.361.541.87Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 40.91$ 91.69$ 15.79$ 44.71$ 41.03$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 76,458.72514.466783,600$ 120,719$ 457,446$ 3,229,049$ 5,616,995$ 459,081$2 76,458.72514.466800,056$ 123,254$ 467,052$ 3,559,555$ 5,616,995$ 494,992$3 76,458.72514.466816,857$ 125,842$ 476,860$ 3,634,476$ 5,616,995$ 505,404$4 76,458.72514.466834,011$ 128,485$ 486,874$ 3,759,734$ 5,743,377$ 520,910$5 76,458.72514.466851,525$ 131,183$ 497,099$ 3,765,368$ 5,872,603$ 524,517$6 11,400.4243.611168,578$ 25,971$ 97,771$ 596,554$ 894,757$ 88,887$7 11,400.4243.611172,118$ 26,516$ 99,825$ 630,078$ 914,889$ 92,854$8 11,400.4243.611175,733$ 27,073$ 101,921$ 652,622$ 935,474$ 95,735$9 11,400.4243.611179,423$ 27,641$ 104,061$ 675,826$ 956,522$ 98,695$10 11,342.0533.543178,547$ 27,506$ 103,522$ 703,646$ 972,937$ 101,322$11 11,081.5493.513180,010$ 27,732$ 104,444$ 709,957$ 971,959$ 102,214$12 8,298.5413.194162,370$ 25,014$ 94,906$ 551,446$ 743,346$ 83,374$13 8,257.7803.188165,389$ 25,479$ 96,651$ 578,839$ 756,332$ 86,636$14 6,238.8112.908149,406$ 23,017$ 86,885$ 464,685$ 583,955$ 72,399$15 6,049.1932.908152,544$ 23,500$ 88,709$ 468,198$ 579,015$ 73,295$16 3,374.4691.60653,402$ 8,227$ 31,283$ 256,823$ 328,976$ 34,974$17 3,374.4691.60654,524$ 8,400$ 31,940$ 266,239$ 336,378$ 36,110$18 3,374.4691.60655,669$ 8,576$ 32,611$ 278,912$ 343,947$ 37,577$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 383,410.58980.9374,411,731$ 679,657$ 2,573,131$ 18,709,036$ 29,100,638$ 2,637,356$NPV - SOC 417,733.00490.2414,891,164$ 753,517$ 2,852,449$ 20,636,377$ 31,884,008$ 2,913,351$Page2of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Residential AuditTotal Administrative Cost: 332,881$Total Participant Cost: 1,781,450$Total Incentives Paid: 1,116,679$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 2,911,527$ 2,177,286$ 2,177,286$ 2,177,286$ 2,817,489$Total Costs 1,781,450$ 3,244,408$ 1,449,560$ 2,114,331$ 2,114,331$Net Benefits 1,130,077$ (1,067,122)$ 727,726$ 62,955$ 703,158$B/C Ratio 1.630.671.501.031.33Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 76.47$ 139.27$ 62.23$ 90.76$ 81.18$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 4,262.4401.20664,353$ 9,914$ 38,186$ 184,310$ 311,165$ 29,676$2 4,262.4401.20665,705$ 10,122$ 38,988$ 202,994$ 311,165$ 31,781$3 4,262.4401.20667,084$ 10,335$ 39,806$ 207,346$ 311,165$ 32,457$4 4,262.4401.20668,493$ 10,552$ 40,642$ 214,804$ 318,166$ 33,449$5 4,262.4401.20669,932$ 10,773$ 41,496$ 215,798$ 325,325$ 33,800$6 875.5000.52534,901$ 5,377$ 19,381$ 51,641$ 69,130$ 11,130$7 875.5000.52535,634$ 5,490$ 19,788$ 53,704$ 70,685$ 11,462$8 875.5000.52536,383$ 5,605$ 20,204$ 55,668$ 72,276$ 11,786$9 875.5000.52537,147$ 5,723$ 20,628$ 58,881$ 73,902$ 12,238$10 875.5000.52537,927$ 5,843$ 21,061$ 62,813$ 75,565$ 12,764$11 703.4630.50537,213$ 5,733$ 20,676$ 53,793$ 62,305$ 11,741$12 696.1660.50037,566$ 5,787$ 20,875$ 56,038$ 63,045$ 12,027$13 696.1660.50038,355$ 5,909$ 21,313$ 60,392$ 64,464$ 12,597$14 685.2190.49939,058$ 6,017$ 21,705$ 63,625$ 64,897$ 13,041$15 685.2190.49939,879$ 6,144$ 22,160$ 66,365$ 66,357$ 13,455$16 649.2190.45837,472$ 5,773$ 20,755$ 66,612$ 64,284$ 13,061$17 649.2190.45838,259$ 5,894$ 21,191$ 66,755$ 65,730$ 13,210$18 649.2190.45839,062$ 6,018$ 21,636$ 71,959$ 67,209$ 13,867$19 649.2190.45839,882$ 6,144$ 22,090$ 74,916$ 68,721$ 14,303$20 649.2190.45840,720$ 6,273$ 22,554$ 77,801$ 70,267$ 14,735$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 23,295.1938.405527,299$ 81,234$ 303,766$ 1,264,987$ 1,794,849$ 217,729$NPV - SOC 26,043.3819.857633,873$ 97,652$ 363,541$ 1,466,287$ 2,031,646$ 256,135$Page3of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Residential New ConstructionTotal Administrative Cost: 359,220$Total Participant Cost: 5,918,743$Total Incentives Paid: 1,655,622$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 7,308,600$ 7,854,080$ 7,854,080$ 7,854,080$ 10,777,535$Total Costs 5,918,743$ 7,667,820$ 2,014,842$ 6,277,963$ 6,277,963$Net Benefits 1,389,857$ 186,260$ 5,839,238$ 1,576,117$ 4,499,572$B/C Ratio 1.231.023.901.251.72Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 87.58$ 113.46$ 29.81$ 92.89$ 76.30$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 6,810.6034.303193,086$ 29,746$ 111,927$ 303,836$ 510,433$ 63,860$2 6,810.6034.303197,140$ 30,371$ 114,278$ 333,432$ 510,433$ 67,522$3 6,810.6034.303201,280$ 31,009$ 116,678$ 342,904$ 510,433$ 69,187$4 6,810.6034.303205,507$ 31,660$ 119,128$ 354,792$ 521,918$ 71,109$5 6,810.6034.303209,823$ 32,325$ 121,630$ 359,684$ 533,661$ 72,346$6 6,810.6034.303214,229$ 33,003$ 124,184$ 376,454$ 545,669$ 74,787$7 6,810.6034.303218,728$ 33,697$ 126,792$ 397,025$ 557,946$ 77,624$8 6,810.6034.303223,321$ 34,404$ 129,454$ 411,166$ 570,500$ 79,835$9 6,810.6034.303228,011$ 35,127$ 132,173$ 431,019$ 583,336$ 82,633$10 6,804.1154.302232,723$ 35,853$ 134,901$ 454,649$ 595,898$ 85,813$11 6,790.3734.300237,490$ 36,587$ 137,667$ 467,491$ 608,085$ 87,924$12 6,790.3734.300242,477$ 37,355$ 140,559$ 487,429$ 621,767$ 90,782$13 6,700.5614.288246,709$ 38,007$ 142,964$ 512,472$ 627,428$ 94,015$14 6,579.2844.271250,756$ 38,631$ 145,346$ 532,998$ 630,033$ 96,773$15 6,509.9294.263255,361$ 39,340$ 148,036$ 549,083$ 637,478$ 99,182$16 3,405.9550.69253,911$ 8,305$ 29,876$ 280,637$ 337,734$ 37,273$17 3,405.9550.69255,043$ 8,480$ 30,503$ 288,064$ 345,333$ 38,209$18 3,405.9550.69256,199$ 8,658$ 31,144$ 304,300$ 353,103$ 40,030$19 1,058.2900.61950,792$ 7,825$ 28,165$ 114,754$ 114,724$ 20,154$20 1,058.2900.61951,859$ 7,989$ 28,756$ 119,172$ 117,305$ 20,778$21 1,058.2900.61952,948$ 8,157$ 29,360$ 123,760$ 119,945$ 21,423$22 1,058.2900.61954,060$ 8,328$ 29,977$ 128,525$ 122,643$ 22,089$23 1,058.2900.61955,195$ 8,503$ 30,606$ 133,473$ 125,403$ 22,778$24 1,058.2900.61956,354$ 8,682$ 31,249$ 138,612$ 128,224$ 23,490$25 1,058.2900.61957,537$ 8,864$ 31,905$ 143,949$ 131,109$ 24,226$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 67,581.79741.4542,147,439$ 330,827$ 1,241,610$ 4,134,203$ 5,652,978$ 785,408$NPV - SOC 82,276.30649.9712,642,053$ 407,026$ 1,525,965$ 5,222,716$ 7,001,117$ 979,776$Page4of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Nonresidential EquipmentTotal Administrative Cost: 473,622$Total Participant Cost: 15,981,705$Total Incentives Paid: 3,078,586$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 20,151,307$ 28,838,264$ 28,838,264$ 28,838,264$ 37,230,290$Total Costs 15,981,705$ 20,624,929$ 3,552,208$ 16,455,327$ 16,455,327$Net Benefits 4,169,601$ 8,213,336$ 25,286,057$ 12,382,937$ 20,774,963$B/C Ratio 1.261.408.121.752.26Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 38.67$ 49.91$ 8.60$ 39.82$ 34.40$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 50,538.3508.052466,210$ 71,823$ 258,046$ 2,132,480$ 1,941,695$ 292,856$2 50,538.3508.052476,000$ 73,331$ 263,465$ 2,376,801$ 1,941,695$ 318,960$3 50,538.3508.052485,996$ 74,871$ 268,997$ 2,429,633$ 1,941,695$ 325,950$4 50,528.6678.050496,101$ 76,428$ 274,590$ 2,513,213$ 1,985,006$ 336,033$5 50,528.6678.050506,519$ 78,033$ 280,357$ 2,490,161$ 2,029,668$ 335,507$6 50,486.1408.045516,817$ 79,619$ 286,057$ 2,678,796$ 2,073,611$ 356,129$7 50,486.1408.045527,670$ 81,291$ 292,064$ 2,792,744$ 2,120,267$ 369,377$8 50,486.1408.045538,751$ 82,998$ 298,197$ 2,896,180$ 2,167,973$ 381,613$9 50,486.1408.045550,065$ 84,741$ 304,460$ 2,959,074$ 2,216,753$ 389,834$10 41,596.8176.265430,854$ 66,376$ 237,815$ 2,557,593$ 1,864,316$ 329,264$11 23,889.7432.852186,282$ 28,698$ 101,347$ 1,480,383$ 1,086,808$ 179,671$12 23,889.7432.852190,194$ 29,301$ 103,475$ 1,533,544$ 1,111,261$ 185,651$13 23,885.4052.852194,143$ 29,909$ 105,623$ 1,635,005$ 1,136,057$ 196,468$14 23,663.3672.808194,739$ 30,001$ 105,921$ 1,693,561$ 1,150,633$ 202,422$15 23,634.7752.804198,468$ 30,575$ 107,946$ 1,743,403$ 1,175,074$ 208,039$16 1,533.5830.81536,332$ 5,597$ 19,021$ 130,572$ 80,799$ 19,152$17 1,529.5310.81437,040$ 5,706$ 19,387$ 131,606$ 82,406$ 19,374$18 1,529.5310.81437,818$ 5,826$ 19,795$ 141,326$ 84,260$ 20,476$19 1,214.8510.75733,531$ 5,166$ 17,739$ 119,159$ 69,317$ 17,560$20 1,214.8510.75734,235$ 5,274$ 18,112$ 123,747$ 70,877$ 18,137$21 320.1810.4274,126$ 636$ 1,879$ 30,821$ 17,869$ 3,746$22 320.1810.4274,212$ 649$ 1,918$ 32,007$ 18,271$ 3,879$23 320.1810.4274,301$ 663$ 1,959$ 33,240$ 18,682$ 4,016$24 320.1810.4274,391$ 676$ 2,000$ 34,519$ 19,103$ 4,159$25 320.1810.4274,483$ 691$ 2,042$ 35,848$ 19,532$ 4,306$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 413,239.62864.8654,056,282$ 624,897$ 2,239,322$ 21,917,763$ 17,072,721$ 2,883,826$NPV - SOC 478,410.76675.2094,705,324$ 724,887$ 2,595,711$ 25,819,796$ 19,941,949$ 3,384,572$Page5of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Nonresidential CustomTotal Administrative Cost: 519,670$Total Participant Cost: 3,439,620$Total Incentives Paid: 1,344,953$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 8,361,371$ 6,652,060$ 6,652,060$ 6,652,060$ 8,545,402$Total Costs 3,439,620$ 8,881,041$ 1,864,623$ 3,959,290$ 3,959,290$Net Benefits 4,921,751$ (2,228,981)$ 4,787,437$ 2,692,770$ 4,586,112$B/C Ratio 2.430.753.571.682.16Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 36.35$ 93.85$ 19.70$ 41.84$ 36.37$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 11,932.7102.014109,702$ 16,900$ 61,571$ 504,065$ 825,708$ 69,224$2 11,932.7102.014112,006$ 17,255$ 62,864$ 563,881$ 825,708$ 75,601$3 11,932.7102.014114,358$ 17,618$ 64,184$ 576,901$ 825,708$ 77,306$4 11,932.7102.014116,759$ 17,988$ 65,532$ 596,298$ 844,287$ 79,658$5 11,932.7102.014119,211$ 18,365$ 66,908$ 588,151$ 863,283$ 79,264$6 11,932.7102.014121,715$ 18,751$ 68,313$ 635,161$ 882,707$ 84,394$7 11,932.7102.014124,271$ 19,145$ 69,748$ 665,212$ 902,568$ 87,838$8 11,932.7102.014126,881$ 19,547$ 71,213$ 689,464$ 922,876$ 90,710$9 11,932.7102.014129,545$ 19,957$ 72,708$ 701,697$ 943,640$ 92,391$10 10,741.2091.875121,938$ 18,785$ 68,539$ 667,429$ 868,321$ 87,669$11 3,546.9580.60035,810$ 5,517$ 19,831$ 223,912$ 291,750$ 28,507$12 3,546.9580.60036,562$ 5,633$ 20,248$ 231,880$ 298,314$ 29,432$13 3,546.9580.60037,329$ 5,751$ 20,673$ 243,749$ 305,027$ 30,750$14 3,544.2020.60038,113$ 5,872$ 21,107$ 256,822$ 311,647$ 32,191$15 3,543.0950.60038,897$ 5,992$ 21,541$ 265,108$ 318,560$ 33,154$16 1,280.2130.21317,831$ 2,747$ 9,834$ 105,146$ 119,777$ 13,556$17 1,280.2130.21318,205$ 2,805$ 10,040$ 106,294$ 122,472$ 13,734$18 1,280.2130.21318,588$ 2,864$ 10,251$ 113,945$ 125,228$ 14,565$19 289.3380.1018,939$ 1,377$ 4,930$ 29,049$ 30,015$ 4,429$20 289.3380.1019,126$ 1,406$ 5,033$ 30,168$ 30,690$ 4,573$21 3.5380.002-$ -$ -$ 305$ 342$ 31$22 3.5380.002-$ -$ -$ 317$ 350$ 32$23 3.5380.002-$ -$ -$ 329$ 358$ 33$24 3.5380.002-$ -$ -$ 342$ 366$ 34$25 3.5380.002-$ -$ -$ 355$ 374$ 35$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 94,630.46316.032956,927$ 147,421$ 536,370$ 5,011,342$ 7,016,418$ 665,206$NPV - SOC 108,862.55918.4631,110,644$ 171,102$ 622,303$ 5,864,498$ 8,141,359$ 776,855$Page6of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Nonresidential Efficiency BidTotal Administrative Cost: 9,434$Total Participant Cost: -$Total Incentives Paid: -$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Total Costs -$ 9,434$ 9,434$ 9,434$ 9,434$Net Benefits -$ (9,434)$ (9,434)$ (9,434)$ (9,434)$B/C Ratio #DIV/0! ----Levelized Cost ($/MWh) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$2 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$3 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$4 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$5 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$6 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$7 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$8 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$9 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$10 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$11 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$12 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$13 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$14 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$15 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$16 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$17 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$18 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - SOC ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Page7of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Small Commercial AuditTotal Administrative Cost: 268,350$Total Participant Cost: 3,601,838$Total Incentives Paid: 1,627,518$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 6,394,533$ 4,985,592$ 4,985,592$ 4,985,592$ 6,291,857$Total Costs 3,601,838$ 6,662,883$ 1,895,868$ 3,870,188$ 3,870,188$Net Benefits 2,792,694$ (1,677,290)$ 3,089,725$ 1,115,404$ 2,421,669$B/C Ratio 1.780.752.631.291.63Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 53.92$ 99.75$ 28.38$ 57.94$ 51.16$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 9,041.3462.049106,415$ 16,394$ 58,142$ 386,208$ 608,290$ 56,716$2 9,041.3462.049108,650$ 16,738$ 59,363$ 433,874$ 608,290$ 61,863$3 9,041.3462.049110,932$ 17,090$ 60,610$ 444,244$ 608,290$ 63,288$4 9,002.6122.043112,856$ 17,386$ 61,658$ 457,121$ 619,301$ 64,902$5 9,002.6122.043115,226$ 17,751$ 62,953$ 448,577$ 633,235$ 64,451$6 9,002.6122.043117,646$ 18,124$ 64,275$ 487,356$ 647,483$ 68,740$7 9,002.6122.043120,117$ 18,505$ 65,624$ 509,415$ 662,051$ 71,366$8 9,002.6122.043122,639$ 18,893$ 67,002$ 527,932$ 676,947$ 73,647$9 9,002.6122.043125,214$ 19,290$ 68,410$ 536,295$ 692,179$ 74,921$10 6,453.7531.52890,708$ 13,974$ 48,997$ 408,308$ 507,530$ 56,199$11 1,029.0600.34214,957$ 2,304$ 6,888$ 67,977$ 83,338$ 9,213$12 1,029.0600.34215,271$ 2,353$ 7,033$ 70,811$ 85,213$ 9,547$13 1,027.7560.34115,577$ 2,400$ 7,172$ 74,114$ 87,021$ 9,926$14 1,003.7920.33715,528$ 2,392$ 7,115$ 76,903$ 86,922$ 10,194$15 1,002.5950.33715,839$ 2,440$ 7,256$ 79,645$ 88,773$ 10,518$16 206.3220.1074,215$ 649$ 2,060$ 19,605$ 19,757$ 2,653$17 206.3220.1074,304$ 663$ 2,104$ 19,534$ 20,202$ 2,660$18 206.3220.1074,394$ 677$ 2,148$ 21,239$ 20,656$ 2,846$19 178.2600.1003,896$ 600$ 1,878$ 19,452$ 18,367$ 2,583$20 178.2600.1003,978$ 613$ 1,917$ 20,201$ 18,780$ 2,671$21 178.2600.1004,061$ 626$ 1,957$ 20,978$ 19,203$ 2,762$22 178.2600.1004,147$ 639$ 1,998$ 21,786$ 19,635$ 2,857$23 178.2600.1004,234$ 652$ 2,040$ 22,625$ 20,077$ 2,955$24 178.2600.1004,323$ 666$ 2,083$ 23,496$ 20,528$ 3,057$25 178.2600.1004,413$ 680$ 2,127$ 24,401$ 20,990$ 3,162$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 66,796.12315.542860,578$ 132,578$ 466,597$ 3,525,839$ 4,767,015$ 498,559$NPV - SOC 75,643.16517.752982,773$ 151,403$ 531,710$ 4,053,985$ 5,437,031$ 571,987$Page8of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Nonresidential Energy AnalysisTotal Administrative Cost: 1,363,079$Total Participant Cost: 10,364,971$Total Incentives Paid: 4,361,125$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 13,359,376$ 16,505,174$ 16,505,174$ 16,505,174$ 21,882,502$Total Costs 10,364,971$ 14,722,455$ 5,724,204$ 11,728,050$ 11,728,050$Net Benefits 2,994,404$ 1,782,720$ 10,780,970$ 4,777,124$ 10,154,451$B/C Ratio 1.291.122.881.411.87Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 38.80$ 55.11$ 21.43$ 43.90$ 37.10$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 29,115.6173.145191,870$ 29,559$ -$ 1,208,284$ 897,169$ 142,971$2 29,115.6173.145195,899$ 30,180$ -$ 1,330,795$ 897,169$ 155,687$3 29,115.6173.145200,013$ 30,813$ -$ 1,356,976$ 897,169$ 158,780$4 29,115.6173.145204,213$ 31,460$ -$ 1,406,414$ 917,355$ 164,209$5 29,115.6173.145208,502$ 32,121$ -$ 1,414,596$ 937,995$ 165,522$6 29,115.6173.145212,881$ 32,796$ -$ 1,501,253$ 959,100$ 174,693$7 29,115.6173.145217,351$ 33,484$ -$ 1,561,191$ 980,680$ 181,203$8 29,115.6173.145221,915$ 34,188$ -$ 1,620,483$ 1,002,745$ 187,659$9 29,115.6173.145226,576$ 34,905$ -$ 1,670,999$ 1,025,307$ 193,248$10 28,484.9653.021222,059$ 34,210$ -$ 1,702,240$ 1,025,054$ 195,851$11 27,572.9352.826213,811$ 32,939$ -$ 1,697,949$ 1,013,824$ 194,470$12 27,572.9352.826218,301$ 33,631$ -$ 1,757,057$ 1,036,635$ 200,899$13 27,572.9352.826222,885$ 34,337$ -$ 1,878,086$ 1,059,959$ 213,531$14 27,558.3732.823227,331$ 35,022$ -$ 1,958,801$ 1,083,220$ 222,115$15 27,558.0512.823232,101$ 35,757$ -$ 2,017,765$ 1,107,579$ 228,562$16 32.0110.022456$ 70$ -$ 2,526$ 1,308$ 305$17 29.4790.022430$ 66$ -$ 2,392$ 1,230$ 289$18 29.4790.022439$ 68$ -$ 2,534$ 1,258$ 304$19 7.0730.018135$ 21$ -$ 633$ 309$ 79$20 7.0730.018138$ 21$ -$ 658$ 316$ 82$21 7.0730.018141$ 22$ -$ 683$ 323$ 85$22 7.0730.018144$ 22$ -$ 709$ 330$ 88$23 7.0730.018147$ 23$ -$ 736$ 337$ 91$24 7.0730.018150$ 23$ -$ 765$ 345$ 94$25 7.0730.018153$ 24$ -$ 794$ 353$ 97$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 267,145.43128.5611,959,858$ 301,929$ -$ 14,243,387$ 8,998,251$ 1,650,517$NPV - SOC 316,087.41833.7422,339,467$ 360,410$ -$ 17,193,306$ 10,759,318$ 1,989,318$Page9of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Commercial New ConstructionTotal Administrative Cost: 2,765,275$Total Participant Cost: 9,716,884$Total Incentives Paid: 4,999,422$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 14,781,156$ 17,268,235$ 17,268,235$ 17,268,235$ 22,647,396$Total Costs 9,716,884$ 17,546,431$ 7,764,697$ 12,482,159$ 12,482,159$Net Benefits 5,064,273$ (278,196)$ 9,503,538$ 4,786,077$ 10,165,237$B/C Ratio 1.520.982.221.381.81Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 41.55$ 75.03$ 33.20$ 53.37$ 45.47$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 26,136.9068.196268,206$ 41,319$ 152,451$ 1,107,127$ 1,005,587$ 156,910$2 26,136.9068.196273,838$ 42,187$ 155,652$ 1,220,903$ 1,005,587$ 169,258$3 26,136.9068.196279,589$ 43,073$ 158,921$ 1,247,730$ 1,005,587$ 172,931$4 26,136.9068.196285,460$ 43,977$ 162,258$ 1,292,677$ 1,028,213$ 178,437$5 26,136.9068.196291,455$ 44,901$ 165,666$ 1,294,383$ 1,051,348$ 179,640$6 26,136.9068.196297,576$ 45,844$ 169,145$ 1,375,555$ 1,075,003$ 188,812$7 26,136.9068.196303,825$ 46,806$ 172,697$ 1,439,886$ 1,099,191$ 196,321$8 26,136.9068.196310,205$ 47,789$ 176,323$ 1,492,526$ 1,123,922$ 202,684$9 26,136.9068.196316,719$ 48,793$ 180,026$ 1,538,356$ 1,149,211$ 208,389$10 26,136.9068.196323,370$ 49,817$ 183,807$ 1,612,915$ 1,175,068$ 216,991$11 26,136.9068.196330,161$ 50,864$ 187,667$ 1,660,202$ 1,201,507$ 222,889$12 26,136.9068.196337,095$ 51,932$ 191,608$ 1,717,647$ 1,228,541$ 229,828$13 26,136.9068.196344,174$ 53,022$ 195,631$ 1,821,717$ 1,256,183$ 241,454$14 26,136.9068.196351,401$ 54,136$ 199,740$ 1,914,659$ 1,284,447$ 251,994$15 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$16 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$17 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$18 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 233,858.23373.3372,687,469$ 414,022$ 1,527,582$ 12,639,162$ 9,781,734$ 1,726,824$NPV - SOC 274,488.59786.0783,184,675$ 490,621$ 1,810,198$ 15,103,047$ 11,588,015$ 2,058,854$Page10of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Residential RecyclingTotal Administrative Cost: 562,648$Total Participant Cost: 489,682$Total Incentives Paid: 216,450$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 1,556,568$ 1,128,136$ 1,128,136$ 1,128,136$ 1,310,433$Total Costs 489,682$ 2,119,215$ 779,098$ 1,052,330$ 1,052,330$Net Benefits 1,066,886$ (991,080)$ 349,038$ 75,806$ 258,104$B/C Ratio 3.180.531.451.071.25Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 27.16$ 117.52$ 43.20$ 58.36$ 55.30$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 4,234.5482.05641,477$ 6,390$ 25,778$ 176,905$ 311,169$ 25,055$2 4,234.5482.05642,348$ 6,524$ 26,320$ 194,897$ 311,169$ 27,009$3 4,234.5482.05643,237$ 6,661$ 26,872$ 198,964$ 311,169$ 27,573$4 4,066.0451.81132,311$ 4,978$ 20,494$ 196,169$ 305,270$ 25,395$5 4,066.0451.81132,990$ 5,082$ 20,925$ 196,209$ 312,139$ 25,521$6 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$7 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$8 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$9 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$10 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$11 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$12 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$13 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$14 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$15 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$16 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$17 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$18 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 18,032.7338.506167,921$ 25,869$ 105,004$ 829,341$ 1,340,118$ 112,814$NPV - SOC 19,030.5658.964176,643$ 27,213$ 110,492$ 876,955$ 1,415,126$ 119,130$Page11of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Nonresidential RecyclingTotal Administrative Cost: 113,229$Total Participant Cost: 16,781$Total Incentives Paid: 7,500$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 29,248$ 37,091$ 37,091$ 37,091$ 43,085$Total Costs 16,781$ 142,477$ 120,729$ 130,010$ 130,010$Net Benefits 12,467$ (105,386)$ (83,638)$ (92,919)$ (86,925)$B/C Ratio 1.740.260.310.290.33Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 29.86$ 253.54$ 214.84$ 231.36$ 219.30$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 132.8960.0751,572$ 242$ 870$ 5,527$ 5,096$ 821$2 132.8960.0751,605$ 247$ 888$ 6,160$ 5,096$ 890$3 132.8960.0751,638$ 252$ 907$ 6,284$ 5,096$ 908$4 125.0040.0591,307$ 201$ 775$ 6,075$ 4,872$ 836$5 125.0040.0591,335$ 206$ 791$ 6,041$ 4,981$ 837$6 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$7 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$8 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$9 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$10 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$11 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$12 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$13 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$14 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$15 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$16 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$17 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$18 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 561.9400.2996,492$ 1,000$ 3,673$ 25,926$ 21,748$ 3,709$NPV - SOC 592.8300.3146,836$ 1,053$ 3,872$ 27,408$ 22,955$ 3,917$Page12of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Residential Low IncomeTotal Administrative Cost: 64,901$Total Participant Cost: 359,123$Total Incentives Paid: 355,603$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 888,021$ 497,991$ 497,991$ 497,991$ 640,186$Total Costs 359,123$ 952,923$ 420,504$ 424,024$ 424,024$Net Benefits 528,898$ (454,932)$ 77,487$ 73,967$ 216,162$B/C Ratio 2.470.521.181.171.51Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 53.10$ 140.90$ 62.18$ 62.70$ 54.78$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 994.7690.1938,297$ 1,278$ 4,850$ 44,697$ 73,861$ 5,912$2 994.7690.1938,471$ 1,305$ 4,952$ 49,094$ 73,861$ 6,382$3 994.7690.1938,649$ 1,332$ 5,056$ 50,435$ 73,861$ 6,547$4 994.7690.1938,831$ 1,360$ 5,162$ 52,215$ 75,523$ 6,757$5 994.7690.1939,016$ 1,389$ 5,271$ 52,955$ 77,222$ 6,863$6 495.9240.1657,272$ 1,120$ 4,315$ 25,334$ 38,582$ 3,804$7 495.9240.1657,425$ 1,144$ 4,406$ 27,136$ 39,450$ 4,011$8 495.9240.1657,581$ 1,168$ 4,498$ 28,075$ 40,338$ 4,132$9 495.9240.1657,740$ 1,192$ 4,593$ 29,068$ 41,245$ 4,259$10 495.9240.1657,903$ 1,217$ 4,689$ 30,270$ 42,173$ 4,408$11 495.9240.1658,069$ 1,243$ 4,788$ 31,356$ 43,122$ 4,546$12 495.9240.1658,238$ 1,269$ 4,888$ 32,386$ 44,092$ 4,678$13 495.9240.1658,411$ 1,296$ 4,991$ 34,015$ 45,084$ 4,871$14 495.9240.1658,588$ 1,323$ 5,096$ 35,636$ 46,099$ 5,064$15 495.9240.1658,768$ 1,351$ 5,203$ 36,928$ 47,136$ 5,225$16 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$17 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$18 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 6,763.0581.65476,526$ 11,789$ 45,081$ 364,595$ 532,419$ 49,799$NPV - SOC 7,740.6351.94690,644$ 13,964$ 53,439$ 423,940$ 614,771$ 58,199$Page13of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Nonresidential Low IncomeTotal Administrative Cost: 1,491$Total Participant Cost: 119,250$Total Incentives Paid: 63,857$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 259,169$ 282,699$ 282,699$ 282,699$ 398,597$Total Costs 119,250$ 260,660$ 65,348$ 120,741$ 120,741$Net Benefits 139,918$ 22,039$ 217,351$ 161,958$ 277,855$B/C Ratio 2.171.084.332.343.30Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 32.10$ 70.17$ 17.59$ 32.51$ 26.28$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 358.8721.3243,123$ 481$ 1,317$ 15,403$ 16,649$ 2,032$2 358.8721.3243,188$ 491$ 1,344$ 17,195$ 16,649$ 2,222$3 358.8721.3243,255$ 501$ 1,373$ 17,596$ 16,649$ 2,272$4 358.8721.3243,324$ 512$ 1,401$ 18,129$ 17,024$ 2,337$5 358.8721.3243,393$ 523$ 1,431$ 18,133$ 17,407$ 2,348$6 358.8721.3243,465$ 534$ 1,461$ 19,227$ 17,798$ 2,469$7 358.8721.3243,537$ 545$ 1,492$ 20,358$ 18,199$ 2,593$8 358.8721.3243,612$ 556$ 1,523$ 21,147$ 18,608$ 2,684$9 358.8721.3243,688$ 568$ 1,555$ 21,829$ 19,027$ 2,764$10 358.8721.3243,765$ 580$ 1,587$ 23,011$ 19,455$ 2,894$11 342.1301.3223,696$ 569$ 1,539$ 22,711$ 18,950$ 2,852$12 336.7341.3223,731$ 575$ 1,548$ 23,302$ 19,079$ 2,916$13 336.7341.3223,810$ 587$ 1,581$ 24,314$ 19,508$ 3,029$14 336.7341.3223,890$ 599$ 1,614$ 25,857$ 19,947$ 3,196$15 336.7341.3223,971$ 612$ 1,648$ 26,850$ 20,396$ 3,308$16 336.7341.3224,055$ 625$ 1,682$ 27,876$ 20,855$ 3,424$17 336.7341.3224,140$ 638$ 1,718$ 28,374$ 21,324$ 3,487$18 336.7341.3224,227$ 651$ 1,754$ 30,282$ 21,804$ 3,691$19 85.061--$ -$ -$ 9,282$ 6,134$ 928$20 85.061--$ -$ -$ 9,639$ 6,272$ 964$21 85.061--$ -$ -$ 10,010$ 6,413$ 1,001$22 85.061--$ -$ -$ 10,396$ 6,557$ 1,040$23 85.061--$ -$ -$ 10,796$ 6,704$ 1,080$24 85.061--$ -$ -$ 11,212$ 6,855$ 1,121$25 85.061--$ -$ -$ 11,643$ 7,010$ 1,164$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 3,714.43613.47836,035$ 5,552$ 15,120$ 225,992$ 195,312$ 28,270$NPV - SOC 4,594.74516.45844,565$ 6,866$ 18,681$ 292,249$ 246,941$ 36,236$Page14of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Residential MultifamilyTotal Administrative Cost: 112,868$Total Participant Cost: 499,871$Total Incentives Paid: 352,280$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 3,116,442$ 2,449,625$ 2,449,625$ 2,449,625$ 3,026,623$Total Costs 499,871$ 3,229,310$ 465,148$ 612,739$ 612,739$Net Benefits 2,616,571$ (779,685)$ 1,984,477$ 1,836,886$ 2,413,884$B/C Ratio 6.230.765.274.004.94Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 13.79$ 89.11$ 12.83$ 16.91$ 15.17$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 5,260.6300.92648,591$ 7,486$ 30,039$ 221,322$ 382,903$ 30,744$2 5,260.6300.92649,612$ 7,643$ 30,669$ 244,153$ 382,903$ 33,208$3 5,260.6300.92650,653$ 7,804$ 31,313$ 249,006$ 382,903$ 33,878$4 5,260.6300.92651,717$ 7,967$ 31,971$ 257,744$ 391,518$ 34,940$5 5,260.6300.92652,803$ 8,135$ 32,642$ 257,967$ 400,327$ 35,155$6 5,260.6300.92653,912$ 8,306$ 33,328$ 274,539$ 409,335$ 37,008$7 5,260.6300.92655,044$ 8,480$ 34,028$ 286,512$ 418,545$ 38,406$8 5,260.6300.92656,200$ 8,658$ 34,742$ 296,918$ 427,962$ 39,652$9 5,260.6300.92657,380$ 8,840$ 35,472$ 305,252$ 437,591$ 40,694$10 1,021.8590.1348,993$ 1,385$ 4,976$ 61,422$ 86,948$ 7,678$11 28.2870.017519$ 80$ 302$ 2,129$ 2,504$ 303$12 28.2870.017530$ 82$ 308$ 2,238$ 2,560$ 316$13 28.2870.017541$ 83$ 315$ 2,413$ 2,618$ 335$14 27.6060.017546$ 84$ 318$ 2,523$ 2,613$ 347$15 27.6060.017558$ 86$ 324$ 2,629$ 2,672$ 360$16 27.5870.017569$ 88$ 331$ 2,784$ 2,730$ 377$17 27.4850.017579$ 89$ 337$ 2,784$ 2,782$ 379$18 27.4850.017591$ 91$ 344$ 2,999$ 2,844$ 402$19 26.7500.017568$ 88$ 332$ 3,039$ 2,831$ 403$20 26.7500.017580$ 89$ 338$ 3,157$ 2,894$ 416$21 26.7500.017592$ 91$ 346$ 3,278$ 2,959$ 431$22 26.7500.017604$ 93$ 353$ 3,404$ 3,026$ 445$23 26.7500.017617$ 95$ 360$ 3,535$ 3,094$ 461$24 26.7500.017630$ 97$ 368$ 3,671$ 3,164$ 477$25 26.7500.017643$ 99$ 376$ 3,813$ 3,235$ 493$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 36,241.6106.410361,183$ 55,643$ 222,897$ 1,809,903$ 2,764,161$ 244,963$NPV - SOC 40,382.4397.163404,543$ 62,323$ 249,561$ 2,035,048$ 3,092,702$ 275,148$Page15of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Nonresidential MultifamilyTotal Administrative Cost: 94,205$Total Participant Cost: 1,153,126$Total Incentives Paid: 273,695$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 1,652,679$ 1,443,026$ 1,443,026$ 1,443,026$ 1,837,943$Total Costs 1,153,126$ 1,746,884$ 367,900$ 1,247,330$ 1,247,330$Net Benefits 499,553$ (303,858)$ 1,075,126$ 195,696$ 590,612$B/C Ratio 1.430.833.921.161.47Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 59.67$ 90.39$ 19.04$ 64.54$ 57.32$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 2,724.8330.70429,540$ 4,551$ 18,122$ 115,278$ 183,687$ 16,749$2 2,724.8330.70430,160$ 4,646$ 18,503$ 127,139$ 183,687$ 18,045$3 2,724.8330.70430,794$ 4,744$ 18,891$ 129,707$ 183,687$ 18,414$4 2,719.9910.70331,390$ 4,836$ 19,260$ 134,049$ 187,485$ 18,953$5 2,719.9910.70332,049$ 4,937$ 19,664$ 134,272$ 191,704$ 19,092$6 2,719.9910.70332,722$ 5,041$ 20,077$ 142,802$ 196,017$ 20,064$7 2,719.9910.70333,409$ 5,147$ 20,499$ 148,994$ 200,427$ 20,805$8 2,719.9910.70334,111$ 5,255$ 20,929$ 154,403$ 204,937$ 21,470$9 2,719.9910.70334,827$ 5,365$ 21,369$ 158,956$ 209,548$ 22,052$10 821.1330.34713,346$ 2,056$ 7,824$ 50,958$ 65,138$ 7,418$11 114.0990.2356,607$ 1,018$ 3,874$ 8,587$ 9,921$ 2,009$12 114.0990.2356,746$ 1,039$ 3,955$ 9,027$ 10,144$ 2,077$13 114.0990.2356,887$ 1,061$ 4,038$ 9,733$ 10,372$ 2,172$14 113.6680.2357,028$ 1,083$ 4,121$ 10,338$ 10,569$ 2,257$15 113.6680.2357,175$ 1,105$ 4,207$ 10,774$ 10,807$ 2,326$16 111.8970.2357,300$ 1,125$ 4,281$ 11,278$ 10,896$ 2,398$17 110.7960.2357,438$ 1,146$ 4,362$ 11,224$ 11,039$ 2,417$18 110.7960.2357,595$ 1,170$ 4,453$ 12,088$ 11,288$ 2,531$19 110.7960.2357,754$ 1,195$ 4,547$ 12,589$ 11,542$ 2,608$20 110.7960.2357,917$ 1,220$ 4,642$ 13,074$ 11,801$ 2,685$21 110.7960.2358,083$ 1,245$ 4,740$ 13,577$ 12,067$ 2,765$22 110.7960.2358,253$ 1,271$ 4,839$ 14,100$ 12,338$ 2,846$23 110.7960.2358,426$ 1,298$ 4,941$ 14,643$ 12,616$ 2,931$24 110.7960.2358,603$ 1,325$ 5,045$ 15,206$ 12,900$ 3,018$25 110.7960.2358,784$ 1,353$ 5,151$ 15,792$ 13,190$ 3,108$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 19,326.0245.956254,101$ 39,146$ 154,840$ 994,938$ 1,378,984$ 144,303$NPV - SOC 21,760.3457.129300,165$ 46,242$ 182,519$ 1,141,931$ 1,565,523$ 167,086$Page16of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Residential AgricultureTotal Administrative Cost: 56,491$Total Participant Cost: 89,696$Total Incentives Paid: 22,979$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 116,069$ 84,031$ 84,031$ 84,031$ 105,289$Total Costs 89,696$ 172,560$ 79,470$ 146,187$ 146,187$Net Benefits 26,373$ (88,529)$ 4,562$ (62,156)$ (40,899)$B/C Ratio 1.290.491.060.570.72Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 74.75$ 143.80$ 66.23$ 121.82$ 108.19$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 163.7480.0481,597$ 246$ 990$ 6,917$ 12,033$ 975$2 163.7480.0481,631$ 251$ 1,010$ 7,630$ 12,033$ 1,052$3 163.7480.0481,665$ 257$ 1,032$ 7,785$ 12,033$ 1,074$4 163.7480.0481,700$ 262$ 1,053$ 8,056$ 12,304$ 1,107$5 163.7480.0481,736$ 267$ 1,075$ 8,060$ 12,581$ 1,114$6 163.7480.0481,772$ 273$ 1,098$ 8,580$ 12,864$ 1,172$7 163.7480.0481,810$ 279$ 1,121$ 8,953$ 13,154$ 1,216$8 163.7480.0481,848$ 285$ 1,145$ 9,277$ 13,450$ 1,255$9 163.7480.0481,886$ 291$ 1,169$ 9,539$ 13,752$ 1,288$10 163.1970.0481,920$ 296$ 1,189$ 9,973$ 14,014$ 1,338$11 3.7470.01795$ 15$ 45$ 257$ 332$ 41$12 3.7470.01797$ 15$ 46$ 270$ 339$ 43$13 3.7470.01799$ 15$ 47$ 284$ 347$ 45$14 2.0590.01680$ 12$ 34$ 181$ 196$ 31$15 2.0590.01682$ 13$ 35$ 188$ 201$ 32$16 1.2830.01676$ 12$ 32$ 124$ 128$ 24$17 1.2830.01678$ 12$ 32$ 123$ 131$ 25$18 1.2830.01679$ 12$ 33$ 134$ 134$ 26$19 1.2830.01681$ 13$ 34$ 140$ 137$ 27$20 1.2830.01683$ 13$ 34$ 145$ 140$ 28$21 1.2830.01685$ 13$ 35$ 151$ 143$ 28$22 1.2830.01686$ 13$ 36$ 157$ 146$ 29$23 1.2830.01688$ 14$ 37$ 163$ 149$ 30$24 1.2830.01690$ 14$ 37$ 169$ 153$ 31$25 1.2830.01692$ 14$ 38$ 176$ 156$ 32$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 1,199.9910.41912,989$ 2,001$ 7,977$ 61,064$ 93,090$ 8,403$NPV - SOC 1,351.2630.50414,829$ 2,285$ 9,076$ 69,527$ 105,366$ 9,572$Page17of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Nonresidential AgricultureTotal Administrative Cost: 80,868$Total Participant Cost: 88,700$Total Incentives Paid: 47,573$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 107,119$ 93,166$ 93,166$ 93,166$ 121,703$Total Costs 88,700$ 187,986$ 128,441$ 169,568$ 169,568$Net Benefits 18,418$ (94,820)$ (35,274)$ (76,402)$ (47,865)$B/C Ratio 1.210.500.730.550.72Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 61.59$ 130.53$ 89.18$ 117.74$ 100.57$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 168.6570.0211,148$ 177$ 627$ 7,043$ 6,438$ 899$2 168.6570.0211,172$ 181$ 640$ 7,816$ 6,438$ 981$3 168.6570.0211,196$ 184$ 654$ 7,978$ 6,438$ 1,001$4 168.6570.0211,221$ 188$ 667$ 8,258$ 6,583$ 1,034$5 168.6570.0211,247$ 192$ 681$ 8,226$ 6,731$ 1,035$6 168.6570.0211,273$ 196$ 696$ 8,817$ 6,883$ 1,098$7 168.6570.0211,300$ 200$ 710$ 9,184$ 7,037$ 1,139$8 168.6570.0211,327$ 204$ 725$ 9,529$ 7,196$ 1,179$9 168.6570.0211,355$ 209$ 740$ 9,770$ 7,358$ 1,207$10 126.5000.011763$ 118$ 402$ 7,583$ 5,615$ 887$11 107.7880.008526$ 81$ 271$ 6,614$ 4,878$ 749$12 107.7880.008537$ 83$ 276$ 6,847$ 4,988$ 774$13 107.7880.008548$ 84$ 282$ 7,294$ 5,100$ 821$14 107.5850.008557$ 86$ 287$ 7,603$ 5,204$ 853$15 107.5850.008569$ 88$ 293$ 7,838$ 5,322$ 879$16 13.0720.003159$ 25$ 66$ 976$ 653$ 123$17 12.9280.002161$ 25$ 67$ 988$ 660$ 124$18 12.9280.002164$ 25$ 68$ 1,040$ 675$ 130$19 3.998--$ -$ -$ 283$ 214$ 28$20 3.998--$ -$ -$ 294$ 218$ 29$21 3.998--$ -$ -$ 305$ 223$ 30$22 3.998--$ -$ -$ 317$ 228$ 32$23 3.998--$ -$ -$ 329$ 233$ 33$24 3.998--$ -$ -$ 341$ 239$ 34$25 3.998--$ -$ -$ 355$ 244$ 35$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 1,440.1830.1689,995$ 1,540$ 5,400$ 76,231$ 59,546$ 9,317$NPV - SOC 1,686.0430.19311,608$ 1,788$ 6,254$ 90,989$ 70,441$ 11,064$Page18of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Residential Third PartyTotal Administrative Cost: 291,345$Total Participant Cost: 226,170$Total Incentives Paid: -$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 784,771$ 661,504$ 661,504$ 661,504$ 727,655$Total Costs 226,170$ 1,076,116$ 291,345$ 517,515$ 517,515$Net Benefits 558,601$ (414,612)$ 370,159$ 143,989$ 210,140$B/C Ratio 3.470.612.271.281.41Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 21.04$ 100.10$ 27.10$ 48.14$ 48.14$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 10,749.9642.986124,559$ 19,189$ 72,968$ 444,789$ 784,771$ 66,150$2 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$3 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$4 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$5 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$6 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$7 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$8 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$9 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$10 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$11 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$12 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$13 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$14 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$15 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$16 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$17 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$18 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 10,749.9642.986124,559$ 19,189$ 72,968$ 444,789$ 784,771$ 66,150$NPV - SOC 10,749.9642.986124,559$ 19,189$ 72,968$ 444,789$ 784,771$ 66,150$Page19of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Nonresidential Third PartyTotal Administrative Cost: 30,270$Total Participant Cost: 454,849$Total Incentives Paid: 49,929$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 165,293$ 178,206$ 178,206$ 178,206$ 228,993$Total Costs 454,849$ 195,563$ 80,199$ 485,119$ 485,119$Net Benefits (289,556)$ (17,357)$ 98,007$ (306,913)$ (256,127)$B/C Ratio 0.360.912.220.370.47Levelized Cost ($/MWh) 163.72$ 70.39$ 28.87$ 174.62$ 150.93$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 337.2850.0432,151$ 331$ 1,228$ 14,363$ 13,022$ 1,807$2 337.2850.0432,197$ 338$ 1,253$ 16,011$ 13,022$ 1,980$3 337.2850.0432,243$ 345$ 1,280$ 16,383$ 13,022$ 2,025$4 337.2850.0432,290$ 353$ 1,307$ 16,948$ 13,315$ 2,090$5 337.2850.0432,338$ 360$ 1,334$ 16,759$ 13,615$ 2,079$6 337.2850.0432,387$ 368$ 1,362$ 18,055$ 13,921$ 2,217$7 337.2850.0432,437$ 375$ 1,391$ 18,875$ 14,234$ 2,308$8 337.2850.0432,488$ 383$ 1,420$ 19,561$ 14,554$ 2,385$9 337.2850.0432,540$ 391$ 1,450$ 19,979$ 14,882$ 2,436$10 337.2850.0432,594$ 400$ 1,480$ 21,116$ 15,217$ 2,559$11 161.017--$ -$ -$ 10,228$ 7,402$ 1,023$12 161.017--$ -$ -$ 10,582$ 7,568$ 1,058$13 161.017--$ -$ -$ 11,223$ 7,739$ 1,122$14 161.017--$ -$ -$ 11,795$ 7,913$ 1,180$15 161.017--$ -$ -$ 12,162$ 8,091$ 1,216$16 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$17 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$18 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 2,778.2130.31216,989$ 2,617$ 9,695$ 148,904$ 115,364$ 17,821$NPV - SOC 3,214.2250.35019,175$ 2,954$ 10,943$ 175,103$ 134,591$ 20,818$Page20of20ExhibitFMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Curtailment ProgramsTotal Participant Cost: -$ (first year)Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 93,341,176$ 209,234,346$ 209,234,346$ 209,234,346$ 275,999,582$Total Costs -$ 122,472,355$ 120,912,059$ 29,131,178$ 34,908,970$Net Benefits 93,341,176$ 86,761,992$ 88,322,287$ 180,103,168$ 241,090,612$B/C Ratio -1.711.737.187.91Levelized Cost ($/kW) -$ 47.48$ 46.88$ 11.29$ 11.41$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedEstimatedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution Avoided Ongoing EstimatedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy Bill Administrative OngoingYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities Costs Incentives1 2,098.033277.56917,155,776$ 2,642,962$ -$ 126,913$ 153,303$ 1,992,565$ 2,795,594$ 9,877,048$2 2,098.033277.56917,516,048$ 2,698,464$ -$ 139,537$ 153,303$ 2,035,405$ 2,851,506$ 9,877,048$3 2,098.033277.56917,883,885$ 2,755,132$ -$ 143,861$ 153,303$ 2,078,288$ 2,908,536$ 9,877,048$4 2,098.033277.56918,259,446$ 2,812,990$ -$ 159,221$ 156,752$ 2,123,166$ 2,966,707$ 9,877,048$5 2,098.033277.56918,642,895$ 2,872,063$ -$ 168,014$ 160,279$ 2,168,297$ 3,026,041$ 9,877,048$6 2,098.033277.56919,034,395$ 2,932,376$ -$ 176,481$ 163,886$ 2,214,325$ 3,086,562$ 9,877,048$7 2,098.033277.56919,434,118$ 2,993,956$ -$ 170,840$ 167,573$ 2,259,891$ 3,148,293$ 9,877,048$8 2,098.033277.56919,842,234$ 3,056,829$ -$ 169,547$ 171,343$ 2,306,861$ 3,211,259$ 9,877,048$9 2,098.033277.56920,258,921$ 3,121,022$ -$ 179,406$ 175,199$ 2,355,935$ 3,275,484$ 9,877,048$10 2,098.033277.56920,684,358$ 3,186,564$ -$ 237,276$ 179,141$ 2,410,820$ 3,340,994$ 9,877,048$11 2,098.033277.56921,118,730$ 3,253,482$ -$ 251,972$ 183,171$ 2,462,418$ 3,407,813$ 9,877,048$12 2,098.033277.56921,562,223$ 3,321,805$ -$ 232,888$ 187,293$ 2,511,692$ 3,475,970$ 9,877,048$13 2,098.033277.56922,015,030$ 3,391,563$ -$ 237,187$ 191,507$ 2,564,378$ 3,545,489$ 9,877,048$14 2,098.033277.56922,477,346$ 3,462,785$ -$ 310,039$ 195,816$ 2,625,017$ 3,616,399$ 9,877,048$15 2,098.033277.56922,949,370$ 3,535,504$ -$ 311,247$ 200,221$ 2,679,612$ 3,688,727$ 9,877,048$16 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$17 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$18 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 19,495.6312,579.267179,819,009$ 27,702,321$ -$ 1,713,016$ 1,560,296$ 20,923,435$ 29,131,178$ 91,780,881$NPV - SOC 23,120.3063,058.810215,596,085$ 33,214,018$ -$ 2,098,608$ 1,870,330$ 25,090,871$ 34,908,970$ 108,845,002$Page1of3ExhibitGMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Residential Load ManagementTotal Participant Cost: -$ (first year)Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 20,877,140$ 55,840,691$ 55,840,691$ 55,840,691$ 73,695,172$Total Costs -$ 44,525,901$ 42,965,606$ 23,648,761$ 28,339,186$Net Benefits 20,877,140$ 11,314,790$ 12,875,086$ 32,191,930$ 45,355,985$B/C Ratio -1.251.302.362.60Levelized Cost ($/kW) -$ 66.06$ 63.75$ 35.09$ 35.45$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedEstimatedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution Avoided Ongoing EstimatedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy Bill Administrative OngoingYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities Costs Incentives1 2,098.03372.5324,474,732$ 689,362$ -$ 126,913$ 153,303$ 529,101$ 2,269,470$ 2,078,793$2 2,098.03372.5324,568,701$ 703,839$ -$ 139,537$ 153,303$ 541,208$ 2,314,859$ 2,078,793$3 2,098.03372.5324,664,644$ 718,620$ -$ 143,861$ 153,303$ 552,712$ 2,361,157$ 2,078,793$4 2,098.03372.5324,762,601$ 733,711$ -$ 159,221$ 156,752$ 565,553$ 2,408,380$ 2,078,793$5 2,098.03372.5324,862,616$ 749,119$ -$ 168,014$ 160,279$ 577,975$ 2,456,547$ 2,078,793$6 2,098.03372.5324,964,731$ 764,850$ -$ 176,481$ 163,886$ 590,606$ 2,505,678$ 2,078,793$7 2,098.03372.5325,068,990$ 780,912$ -$ 170,840$ 167,573$ 602,074$ 2,555,792$ 2,078,793$8 2,098.03372.5325,175,439$ 797,311$ -$ 169,547$ 171,343$ 614,230$ 2,606,908$ 2,078,793$9 2,098.03372.5325,284,123$ 814,055$ -$ 179,406$ 175,199$ 627,758$ 2,659,046$ 2,078,793$10 2,098.03372.5325,395,090$ 831,150$ -$ 237,276$ 179,141$ 646,352$ 2,712,227$ 2,078,793$11 2,098.03372.5325,508,387$ 848,604$ -$ 251,972$ 183,171$ 660,896$ 2,766,471$ 2,078,793$12 2,098.03372.5325,624,063$ 866,424$ -$ 232,888$ 187,293$ 672,337$ 2,821,801$ 2,078,793$13 2,098.03372.5325,742,168$ 884,619$ -$ 237,187$ 191,507$ 686,397$ 2,878,237$ 2,078,793$14 2,098.03372.5325,862,754$ 903,196$ -$ 310,039$ 195,816$ 707,599$ 2,935,801$ 2,078,793$15 2,098.03372.5325,985,872$ 922,164$ -$ 311,247$ 200,221$ 721,928$ 2,994,517$ 2,078,793$16 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$17 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$18 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 19,495.631673.99246,902,094$ 7,225,581$ -$ 1,713,016$ 1,560,296$ 5,584,069$ 23,648,761$ 19,316,844$NPV - SOC 23,120.306799.30256,233,809$ 8,663,194$ -$ 2,098,608$ 1,870,330$ 6,699,561$ 28,339,186$ 22,908,278$Page2of3ExhibitGMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Electric Summary - Nonresidential Load CurtailmentTotal Participant Cost: -$ (first year)Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 72,464,036$ 153,393,655$ 153,393,655$ 153,393,655$ 202,304,410$Total Costs -$ 77,946,453$ 77,946,453$ 5,482,417$ 6,569,783$Net Benefits 72,464,036$ 75,447,202$ 75,447,202$ 147,911,238$ 195,734,627$B/C Ratio -1.971.9727.9830.79Levelized Cost ($/kW) -$ 40.91$ 40.91$ 2.88$ 2.91$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedEstimatedLoss Adjusted Loss Adjusted Generation Transmission Distribution Avoided Ongoing EstimatedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy Bill Administrative OngoingYear MWh MW Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities Costs Incentives1 -205.03712,681,045$ 1,953,600$ -$ -$ -$ 1,463,464$ 526,124$ 7,798,256$2 -205.03712,947,346$ 1,994,625$ -$ -$ -$ 1,494,197$ 536,646$ 7,798,256$3 -205.03713,219,241$ 2,036,512$ -$ -$ -$ 1,525,575$ 547,379$ 7,798,256$4 -205.03713,496,845$ 2,079,279$ -$ -$ -$ 1,557,612$ 558,327$ 7,798,256$5 -205.03713,780,279$ 2,122,944$ -$ -$ -$ 1,590,322$ 569,494$ 7,798,256$6 -205.03714,069,664$ 2,167,526$ -$ -$ -$ 1,623,719$ 580,883$ 7,798,256$7 -205.03714,365,127$ 2,213,044$ -$ -$ -$ 1,657,817$ 592,501$ 7,798,256$8 -205.03714,666,795$ 2,259,518$ -$ -$ -$ 1,692,631$ 604,351$ 7,798,256$9 -205.03714,974,798$ 2,306,968$ -$ -$ -$ 1,728,177$ 616,438$ 7,798,256$10 -205.03715,289,268$ 2,355,414$ -$ -$ -$ 1,764,468$ 628,767$ 7,798,256$11 -205.03715,610,343$ 2,404,878$ -$ -$ -$ 1,801,522$ 641,342$ 7,798,256$12 -205.03715,938,160$ 2,455,380$ -$ -$ -$ 1,839,354$ 654,169$ 7,798,256$13 -205.03716,272,862$ 2,506,943$ -$ -$ -$ 1,877,980$ 667,252$ 7,798,256$14 -205.03716,614,592$ 2,559,589$ -$ -$ -$ 1,917,418$ 680,597$ 7,798,256$15 -205.03716,963,498$ 2,613,340$ -$ -$ -$ 1,957,684$ 694,209$ 7,798,256$16 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$17 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$18 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC -1,905.275132,916,916$ 20,476,740$ -$ -$ -$ 15,339,366$ 5,482,417$ 72,464,036$NPV - SOC -2,259.509159,362,276$ 24,550,824$ -$ -$ -$ 18,391,310$ 6,569,783$ 85,936,724$Page3of3ExhibitGMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas SummaryTotal Administrative Cost: 4,581,159$Total Participant Cost: 44,837,642$Total Incentives Paid: 13,645,230$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 56,085,368$ 37,846,565$ 37,846,565$ 37,846,565$ 50,964,042$Total Costs 44,837,642$ 60,666,527$ 18,226,389$ 49,418,801$ 49,418,801$Net Benefits 11,247,725$ (22,819,961)$ 19,620,176$ (11,572,236)$ 1,545,241$B/C Ratio 1.250.622.080.771.03Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 11.15$ 15.09$ 4.53$ 12.29$ 10.02$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 430,693.1025,876.648332,611$ -$ -$ 3,382,924$ 4,398,523$ 292,728$2 395,686.0025,397.099296,047$ -$ -$ 3,035,003$ 4,003,649$ 263,560$3 395,686.0025,397.099296,047$ -$ -$ 3,032,241$ 3,931,082$ 261,927$4 395,686.0025,397.099296,047$ -$ -$ 3,098,700$ 3,877,866$ 265,247$5 395,686.0025,397.099296,047$ -$ -$ 3,173,887$ 3,829,457$ 270,763$6 389,125.4075,386.754295,258$ -$ -$ 3,193,755$ 3,778,967$ 273,911$7 389,125.4075,386.754295,258$ -$ -$ 3,265,473$ 3,862,517$ 279,614$8 389,125.4075,386.754295,258$ -$ -$ 3,338,914$ 3,954,789$ 285,370$9 389,125.4075,386.754295,258$ -$ -$ 3,414,165$ 4,046,815$ 291,267$10 380,409.6675,363.422293,479$ -$ -$ 3,414,865$ 4,045,711$ 291,455$11 371,090.5435,338.572291,587$ -$ -$ 3,408,838$ 4,036,984$ 291,121$12 371,090.5435,338.572291,587$ -$ -$ 3,485,454$ 4,127,936$ 297,150$13 370,851.7435,337.870291,534$ -$ -$ 3,561,564$ 4,218,075$ 303,134$14 360,352.2865,306.293289,333$ -$ -$ 3,541,592$ 4,192,579$ 301,378$15 345,470.2915,266.014286,293$ -$ -$ 3,476,227$ 4,111,543$ 294,433$16 301,044.9084,773.986262,667$ -$ -$ 3,102,867$ 3,694,286$ 270,550$17 301,044.9084,773.986262,667$ -$ -$ 3,172,676$ 3,777,530$ 276,150$18 300,808.2084,773.291262,614$ -$ -$ 3,241,462$ 3,859,617$ 281,682$19 133,464.0282,380.96490,451$ -$ -$ 1,457,556$ 1,729,171$ 116,124$20 133,464.0282,380.96490,451$ -$ -$ 1,490,331$ 1,768,064$ 118,582$21 64,682.3051,612.13463,518$ -$ -$ 749,423$ 894,440$ 60,971$22 64,682.3051,612.13463,518$ -$ -$ 766,250$ 914,597$ 62,233$23 64,682.3051,612.13463,518$ -$ -$ 783,485$ 935,159$ 63,525$24 64,682.3051,612.13463,518$ -$ -$ 801,142$ 956,236$ 64,850$25 64,682.3051,612.13463,518$ -$ -$ 819,159$ 977,716$ 66,201$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 4,019,989.78357,373.5623,110,804$ -$ -$ 34,735,761$ 42,440,138$ 2,973,732$NPV - SOC 4,930,090.21571,310.3773,839,237$ -$ -$ 43,413,461$ 52,783,669$ 3,711,343$Page1of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Residential EquipmentTotal Administrative Cost: 937,273$Total Participant Cost: 17,937,505$Total Incentives Paid: 3,895,135$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 15,970,500$ 10,790,090$ 10,790,090$ 10,790,090$ 14,387,806$Total Costs 17,937,505$ 16,907,773$ 4,832,408$ 18,874,778$ 18,874,778$Net Benefits (1,967,005)$ (6,117,683)$ 5,957,681$ (8,084,688)$ (4,486,972)$B/C Ratio 0.890.642.230.570.76Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 15.82$ 14.91$ 4.26$ 16.65$ 13.77$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 116,408.0211,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 922,688$ 1,209,462$ 90,930$2 116,408.0211,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 902,942$ 1,202,282$ 89,119$3 116,408.0211,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 899,125$ 1,181,004$ 87,406$4 116,408.0211,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 916,951$ 1,165,464$ 87,079$5 116,408.0211,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 939,258$ 1,151,181$ 88,628$6 113,318.0971,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 935,561$ 1,122,073$ 90,068$7 113,318.0971,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 956,569$ 1,145,052$ 91,968$8 113,318.0971,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 978,086$ 1,172,444$ 93,830$9 113,318.0971,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 1,000,130$ 1,199,704$ 95,737$10 113,318.0971,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 1,022,595$ 1,226,655$ 97,690$11 113,318.0971,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 1,045,676$ 1,254,249$ 99,681$12 113,318.0971,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 1,069,177$ 1,282,507$ 101,726$13 113,318.0971,344.262102,215$ -$ -$ 1,093,206$ 1,311,326$ 103,808$14 106,021.4861,324.735100,726$ -$ -$ 1,048,299$ 1,256,834$ 100,235$15 91,976.5971,286.75597,859$ -$ -$ 935,005$ 1,119,630$ 89,709$16 85,852.9271,199.62691,217$ -$ -$ 892,311$ 1,068,521$ 91,900$17 85,852.9271,199.62691,217$ -$ -$ 912,393$ 1,092,599$ 93,770$18 85,852.9271,199.62691,217$ -$ -$ 932,881$ 1,117,188$ 95,684$19 1,973.0765.282403$ -$ -$ 21,019$ 25,408$ 1,630$20 1,973.0765.282403$ -$ -$ 21,492$ 25,979$ 1,666$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 1,133,676.88713,535.0471,029,181$ -$ -$ 9,760,909$ 12,075,365$ 944,496$NPV - SOC 1,371,046.75616,476.2091,252,823$ -$ -$ 11,975,470$ 14,745,545$ 1,159,513$Page2of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Residential AuditTotal Administrative Cost: 867,874$Total Participant Cost: 4,341,644$Total Incentives Paid: 2,546,107$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 7,396,643$ 4,353,020$ 4,353,020$ 4,353,020$ 6,091,862$Total Costs 4,341,644$ 8,264,517$ 3,413,981$ 5,209,518$ 5,209,518$Net Benefits 3,055,000$ (3,911,497)$ 939,039$ (856,497)$ 882,344$B/C Ratio 1.700.531.280.841.17Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 9.86$ 18.76$ 7.75$ 11.83$ 9.34$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities141,95049337,579$‐$‐$332,251$436,230$27,737$241,95049337,579$‐$‐$325,145$433,625$27,204$341,95049337,579$‐$‐$323,843$425,955$27,107$441,95049337,579$‐$‐$330,309$420,374$27,592$541,95049337,579$‐$‐$338,343$415,250$28,194$641,95049337,579$‐$‐$346,282$415,976$28,790$741,95049337,579$‐$‐$354,057$424,515$29,373$841,95049337,579$‐$‐$362,021$434,669$29,970$941,95049337,579$‐$‐$370,181$444,774$30,582$1033,23447035,800$‐$‐$302,498$362,750$25,372$1133,14046935,781$‐$‐$308,492$369,902$25,820$1233,14046935,781$‐$‐$315,425$378,236$26,340$1333,14046935,781$‐$‐$322,512$386,734$26,872$1433,14046935,781$‐$‐$329,783$395,458$27,417$1533,14046935,781$‐$‐$337,205$404,347$27,974$1631,34644433,835$‐$‐$326,116$391,050$26,996$1731,34644433,835$‐$‐$333,456$399,862$27,547$1831,34644433,835$‐$‐$340,943$408,861$28,108$1931,34644433,835$‐$‐$348,631$418,053$28,685$2031,34644433,835$‐$‐$356,466$427,461$29,273$2131,34644433,835$‐$‐$364,504$437,064$29,875$2231,34644433,835$‐$‐$372,688$446,914$30,489$2331,34644433,835$‐$‐$381,072$456,961$31,118$2431,34644433,835$‐$‐$389,660$467,260$31,762$2531,34644433,835$‐$‐$398,423$477,756$32,419$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 440,498.7425,552.129423,332$ -$ -$ 3,929,689$ 4,850,536$ 326,477$NPV - SOC 558,007.9097,140.419544,434$ -$ -$ 5,122,414$ 6,286,804$ 425,014$Page3of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Residential New ConstructionTotal Administrative Cost: 575,304$Total Participant Cost: 9,860,987$Total Incentives Paid: 2,808,645$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 13,751,272$ 9,951,924$ 9,951,924$ 9,951,924$ 13,503,361$Total Costs 9,860,987$ 14,326,576$ 3,383,949$ 10,436,291$ 10,436,291$Net Benefits 3,890,285$ (4,374,652)$ 6,567,975$ (484,367)$ 3,067,070$B/C Ratio 1.390.692.940.951.29Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 9.80$ 14.24$ 3.36$ 10.37$ 8.36$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 770,914$ 1,005,229$ 65,395$2 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 754,277$ 1,000,040$ 64,147$3 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 748,100$ 982,575$ 63,684$4 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 761,050$ 969,539$ 64,655$5 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 779,624$ 957,372$ 66,048$6 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 797,903$ 955,765$ 67,419$7 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 815,819$ 973,387$ 68,763$8 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 834,173$ 996,738$ 70,139$9 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 852,974$ 1,019,903$ 71,549$10 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 872,132$ 1,042,813$ 72,986$11 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 891,819$ 1,066,275$ 74,463$12 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 911,862$ 1,090,298$ 75,966$13 95,933.0932,129.878101,015$ -$ -$ 932,351$ 1,114,796$ 77,502$14 93,938.7052,121.841100,608$ -$ -$ 934,359$ 1,117,001$ 77,623$15 93,157.3102,119.725100,449$ -$ -$ 947,774$ 1,132,922$ 78,617$16 92,688.0582,114.227100,029$ -$ -$ 964,193$ 1,152,550$ 79,817$17 92,688.0582,114.227100,029$ -$ -$ 985,894$ 1,178,521$ 81,444$18 92,688.0582,114.227100,029$ -$ -$ 1,008,031$ 1,205,045$ 83,105$19 23,768.6701,058.26225,273$ -$ -$ 264,238$ 315,884$ 21,713$20 23,768.6701,058.26225,273$ -$ -$ 270,177$ 322,993$ 22,159$21 23,518.9701,057.24525,222$ -$ -$ 273,488$ 326,892$ 22,403$22 23,518.9701,057.24525,222$ -$ -$ 279,628$ 334,260$ 22,864$23 23,518.9701,057.24525,222$ -$ -$ 285,919$ 341,774$ 23,336$24 23,518.9701,057.24525,222$ -$ -$ 292,363$ 349,477$ 23,819$25 23,518.9701,057.24525,222$ -$ -$ 298,938$ 357,327$ 24,312$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 1,006,135.28923,184.6591,063,593$ -$ -$ 8,888,332$ 10,942,627$ 746,394$NPV - SOC 1,247,752.83029,227.3711,320,453$ -$ -$ 11,240,813$ 13,768,767$ 942,095$Page4of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Nonresidential EquipmentTotal Administrative Cost: 94,095$Total Participant Cost: 3,734,782$Total Incentives Paid: 263,233$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 1,502,565$ 1,080,781$ 1,080,781$ 1,080,781$ 1,468,646$Total Costs 3,734,782$ 1,596,660$ 357,328$ 3,828,877$ 3,828,877$Net Benefits (2,232,217)$ (515,879)$ 723,452$ (2,748,096)$ (2,360,231)$B/C Ratio 0.400.683.020.280.38Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 31.09$ 13.29$ 2.97$ 31.87$ 25.71$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 11,496.019122.9964,936$ -$ -$ 87,882$ 113,577$ 6,961$2 11,496.019122.9964,936$ -$ -$ 86,044$ 112,644$ 6,823$3 11,496.019122.9964,936$ -$ -$ 86,600$ 110,520$ 6,865$4 11,496.019122.9964,936$ -$ -$ 88,897$ 108,984$ 7,037$5 11,496.019122.9964,936$ -$ -$ 91,042$ 107,621$ 7,198$6 11,496.019122.9964,936$ -$ -$ 93,181$ 108,663$ 7,359$7 11,496.019122.9964,936$ -$ -$ 95,274$ 111,456$ 7,516$8 11,496.019122.9964,936$ -$ -$ 97,416$ 114,108$ 7,676$9 11,496.019122.9964,936$ -$ -$ 99,611$ 116,766$ 7,841$10 11,496.019122.9964,936$ -$ -$ 101,850$ 119,390$ 8,009$11 11,496.019122.9964,936$ -$ -$ 104,148$ 122,074$ 8,181$12 11,496.019122.9964,936$ -$ -$ 106,489$ 124,825$ 8,357$13 11,257.219122.2944,882$ -$ -$ 106,651$ 125,006$ 8,365$14 11,191.111122.0794,866$ -$ -$ 108,423$ 127,083$ 8,497$15 11,141.735121.9184,854$ -$ -$ 110,379$ 129,373$ 8,642$16 10,374.624115.0114,587$ -$ -$ 105,109$ 123,191$ 8,227$17 10,374.624115.0114,587$ -$ -$ 107,472$ 125,966$ 8,404$18 10,348.324114.9334,582$ -$ -$ 109,612$ 128,476$ 8,565$19 3,371.44736.9161,425$ -$ -$ 36,509$ 42,793$ 2,845$20 3,371.44736.9161,425$ -$ -$ 37,331$ 43,755$ 2,907$21 2,917.67233.0281,227$ -$ -$ 33,043$ 38,725$ 2,570$22 2,917.67233.0281,227$ -$ -$ 33,785$ 39,597$ 2,626$23 2,917.67233.0281,227$ -$ -$ 34,545$ 40,488$ 2,683$24 2,917.67233.0281,227$ -$ -$ 35,323$ 41,401$ 2,741$25 2,917.67233.0281,227$ -$ -$ 36,117$ 42,331$ 2,801$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 120,131.7821,293.59451,729$ -$ -$ 1,029,051$ 1,239,331$ 81,059$NPV - SOC 148,906.9201,606.59764,156$ -$ -$ 1,302,027$ 1,560,408$ 102,464$Page5of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Nonresidential CustomTotal Administrative Cost: 160,859$Total Participant Cost: 1,140,315$Total Incentives Paid: 395,473$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 2,900,866$ 2,190,453$ 2,190,453$ 2,190,453$ 2,895,869$Total Costs 1,140,315$ 3,061,725$ 556,332$ 1,301,174$ 1,301,174$Net Benefits 1,760,550$ (871,271)$ 1,634,121$ 889,279$ 1,594,695$B/C Ratio 2.540.723.941.682.23Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 4.60$ 12.36$ 2.25$ 5.25$ 4.33$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 192,612$ 247,165$ 15,194$2 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 188,578$ 245,149$ 14,891$3 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 189,689$ 240,506$ 14,975$4 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 194,651$ 237,101$ 15,347$5 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 199,349$ 234,069$ 15,699$6 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 204,034$ 236,203$ 16,051$7 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 208,616$ 242,212$ 16,394$8 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 213,306$ 247,979$ 16,746$9 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 218,114$ 253,758$ 17,107$10 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 223,014$ 259,459$ 17,474$11 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 228,047$ 265,294$ 17,852$12 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 233,172$ 271,271$ 18,236$13 25,147.409167.2879,973$ -$ -$ 238,415$ 277,367$ 18,629$14 24,050.700163.6739,698$ -$ -$ 233,160$ 271,256$ 18,214$15 24,050.700163.6739,698$ -$ -$ 238,404$ 277,355$ 18,608$16 12,569.10091.2905,754$ -$ -$ 128,119$ 148,885$ 10,041$17 12,569.10091.2905,754$ -$ -$ 131,000$ 152,240$ 10,257$18 12,569.10091.2905,754$ -$ -$ 133,944$ 155,664$ 10,477$19 6,290.10043.4082,913$ -$ -$ 68,949$ 80,034$ 5,390$20 6,290.10043.4082,913$ -$ -$ 70,499$ 81,835$ 5,506$21 675.4007.982306$ -$ -$ 7,649$ 8,899$ 597$22 675.4007.982306$ -$ -$ 7,821$ 9,099$ 609$23 675.4007.982306$ -$ -$ 7,997$ 9,304$ 623$24 675.4007.982306$ -$ -$ 8,177$ 9,514$ 636$25 675.4007.982306$ -$ -$ 8,361$ 9,727$ 650$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 247,805.6901,662.00399,319$ -$ -$ 2,091,134$ 2,505,393$ 164,284$NPV - SOC 300,236.4472,019.556120,750$ -$ -$ 2,573,082$ 3,068,417$ 202,037$Page6of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Small Commercial AuditTotal Administrative Cost: 128,177$Total Participant Cost: 1,641,047$Total Incentives Paid: 358,455$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 1,618,312$ 1,096,667$ 1,096,667$ 1,096,667$ 1,521,058$Total Costs 1,641,047$ 1,746,489$ 486,632$ 1,769,224$ 1,769,224$Net Benefits (22,734)$ (649,823)$ 610,035$ (672,557)$ (248,166)$B/C Ratio 0.990.632.250.620.86Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 13.60$ 14.48$ 4.03$ 14.66$ 11.64$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 11,124.831109.1474,607$ -$ -$ 85,084$ 110,046$ 6,727$2 11,124.831109.1474,607$ -$ -$ 83,304$ 109,145$ 6,593$3 11,124.831109.1474,607$ -$ -$ 83,831$ 107,091$ 6,633$4 11,124.831109.1474,607$ -$ -$ 86,047$ 105,605$ 6,799$5 11,124.831109.1474,607$ -$ -$ 88,123$ 104,287$ 6,955$6 11,102.731109.0824,602$ -$ -$ 90,017$ 105,080$ 7,096$7 11,102.731109.0824,602$ -$ -$ 92,039$ 107,773$ 7,248$8 11,102.731109.0824,602$ -$ -$ 94,108$ 110,337$ 7,403$9 11,102.731109.0824,602$ -$ -$ 96,229$ 112,908$ 7,562$10 11,102.731109.0824,602$ -$ -$ 98,391$ 115,445$ 7,724$11 11,024.110108.7614,578$ -$ -$ 99,909$ 117,214$ 7,837$12 11,024.110108.7614,578$ -$ -$ 102,154$ 119,855$ 8,005$13 11,024.110108.7614,578$ -$ -$ 104,451$ 122,549$ 8,177$14 10,982.001108.5884,565$ -$ -$ 106,404$ 124,839$ 8,323$15 10,975.665108.5674,563$ -$ -$ 108,734$ 127,573$ 8,497$16 9,780.771100.3744,142$ -$ -$ 99,171$ 116,329$ 7,749$17 9,780.771100.3744,142$ -$ -$ 101,401$ 118,950$ 7,916$18 9,570.37199.7564,095$ -$ -$ 101,481$ 119,039$ 7,918$19 8,331.68784.2683,535$ -$ -$ 90,350$ 105,976$ 7,041$20 8,331.68784.2683,535$ -$ -$ 92,382$ 108,359$ 7,194$21 5,124.91059.0072,191$ -$ -$ 58,040$ 68,089$ 4,517$22 5,124.91059.0072,191$ -$ -$ 59,344$ 69,622$ 4,615$23 5,124.91059.0072,191$ -$ -$ 60,678$ 71,188$ 4,715$24 5,124.91059.0072,191$ -$ -$ 62,045$ 72,793$ 4,818$25 5,124.91059.0072,191$ -$ -$ 63,440$ 74,429$ 4,922$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 120,649.4561,199.35750,201$ -$ -$ 1,046,466$ 1,259,857$ 82,250$NPV - SOC 152,058.7121,518.97663,365$ -$ -$ 1,351,573$ 1,618,889$ 106,120$Page7of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Nonresidential Energy AnalysisTotal Administrative Cost: 116,374$Total Participant Cost: 2,020,286$Total Incentives Paid: 365,818$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 2,289,174$ 1,818,142$ 1,818,142$ 1,818,142$ 2,345,369$Total Costs 2,020,286$ 2,405,548$ 482,192$ 2,136,660$ 2,136,660$Net Benefits 268,888$ (587,405)$ 1,335,950$ (318,517)$ 208,710$B/C Ratio 1.130.763.770.851.10Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 9.73$ 11.59$ 2.32$ 10.30$ 8.67$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 170,522$ 204,438$ 13,545$2 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 166,953$ 202,646$ 13,277$3 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 167,965$ 198,533$ 13,353$4 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 172,377$ 195,194$ 13,684$5 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 176,536$ 192,179$ 13,996$6 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 180,685$ 193,759$ 14,307$7 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 184,743$ 198,751$ 14,611$8 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 188,896$ 203,504$ 14,923$9 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 193,154$ 208,259$ 15,242$10 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 197,494$ 212,938$ 15,568$11 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 201,950$ 217,726$ 15,902$12 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 206,489$ 222,631$ 16,242$13 22,276.094289.05610,074$ -$ -$ 211,132$ 227,634$ 16,590$14 22,275.364289.05310,074$ -$ -$ 215,884$ 232,761$ 16,947$15 22,275.364289.05310,074$ -$ -$ 220,739$ 237,994$ 17,311$16 235.6642.853101$ -$ -$ 2,388$ 2,574$ 187$17 235.6642.853101$ -$ -$ 2,442$ 2,633$ 191$18 235.6642.853101$ -$ -$ 2,496$ 2,692$ 195$19 224.9662.71996$ -$ -$ 2,437$ 2,627$ 190$20 224.9662.71996$ -$ -$ 2,492$ 2,686$ 194$21 224.9662.71996$ -$ -$ 2,548$ 2,747$ 198$22 224.9662.71996$ -$ -$ 2,605$ 2,809$ 203$23 224.9662.71996$ -$ -$ 2,664$ 2,872$ 207$24 224.9662.71996$ -$ -$ 2,724$ 2,937$ 211$25 224.9662.71996$ -$ -$ 2,785$ 3,003$ 216$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 207,529.0202,692.44193,837$ -$ -$ 1,724,305$ 1,923,355$ 136,361$NPV - SOC 246,405.0253,196.555111,408$ -$ -$ 2,070,330$ 2,298,603$ 163,630$Page8of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Commercial New ConstructionTotal Administrative Cost: 839,658$Total Participant Cost: 1,573,009$Total Incentives Paid: 945,937$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 5,844,137$ 4,206,462$ 4,206,462$ 4,206,462$ 5,734,013$Total Costs 1,573,009$ 6,683,795$ 1,785,595$ 2,412,667$ 2,412,667$Net Benefits 4,271,128$ (2,477,333)$ 2,420,867$ 1,793,795$ 3,321,346$B/C Ratio 3.720.632.361.742.38Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 3.26$ 13.86$ 3.70$ 5.00$ 4.02$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 334,785$ 436,341$ 26,109$2 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 327,928$ 431,947$ 25,594$3 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 333,139$ 423,534$ 25,985$4 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 343,899$ 417,693$ 26,792$5 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 352,135$ 412,701$ 27,410$6 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 360,424$ 419,819$ 28,031$7 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 368,519$ 432,530$ 28,639$8 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 376,801$ 442,760$ 29,260$9 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 385,292$ 453,087$ 29,897$10 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 393,952$ 463,268$ 30,546$11 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 402,839$ 473,681$ 31,213$12 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 411,894$ 484,352$ 31,892$13 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 421,159$ 495,241$ 32,587$14 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 430,652$ 506,407$ 33,299$15 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 440,330$ 517,792$ 34,024$16 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 450,243$ 529,440$ 34,768$17 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 460,359$ 541,369$ 35,527$18 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 470,710$ 553,539$ 36,303$19 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 481,306$ 565,999$ 37,098$20 45,166.800579.90013,329$ -$ -$ 492,137$ 578,720$ 37,910$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 482,068.9906,189.321142,262$ -$ -$ 4,064,201$ 4,898,200$ 315,485$NPV - SOC 599,573.7617,697.973176,938$ -$ -$ 5,157,028$ 6,186,452$ 400,047$Page9of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Residential Low IncomeTotal Administrative Cost: 423,054$Total Participant Cost: 1,827,738$Total Incentives Paid: 1,824,218$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 3,226,755$ 1,224,299$ 1,224,299$ 1,224,299$ 1,637,661$Total Costs 1,827,738$ 3,649,808$ 2,247,272$ 2,250,792$ 2,250,792$Net Benefits 1,399,016$ (2,425,510)$ (1,022,973)$ (1,026,493)$ (613,130)$B/C Ratio 1.770.340.540.540.73Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 14.17$ 28.29$ 17.42$ 17.44$ 14.27$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 14,141.120121.2539,245$ -$ -$ 113,974$ 148,912$ 9,241$2 14,141.120121.2539,245$ -$ -$ 111,510$ 148,171$ 9,057$3 14,141.120121.2539,245$ -$ -$ 110,503$ 145,599$ 8,981$4 14,141.120121.2539,245$ -$ -$ 112,356$ 143,680$ 9,120$5 14,141.120121.2539,245$ -$ -$ 115,100$ 141,885$ 9,326$6 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 89,076$ 107,045$ 7,315$7 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 91,076$ 108,974$ 7,465$8 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 93,125$ 111,590$ 7,619$9 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 95,224$ 114,183$ 7,776$10 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 97,363$ 116,747$ 7,937$11 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 99,561$ 119,374$ 8,102$12 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 101,798$ 122,064$ 8,269$13 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 104,086$ 124,806$ 8,441$14 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 106,432$ 127,622$ 8,617$15 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 108,828$ 130,491$ 8,797$16 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 111,274$ 133,423$ 8,980$17 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 113,778$ 136,430$ 9,168$18 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 116,333$ 139,501$ 9,360$19 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 118,956$ 142,637$ 9,556$20 10,693.200110.9758,462$ -$ -$ 121,629$ 145,847$ 9,757$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 129,022.7421,228.84393,696$ -$ -$ 1,130,603$ 1,402,537$ 91,822$NPV - SOC 157,676.7861,520.042115,899$ -$ -$ 1,407,507$ 1,736,624$ 114,255$Page10of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Nonresidential Low IncomeTotal Administrative Cost: 161$Total Participant Cost: 50,131$Total Incentives Paid: 9,437$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 37,532$ 25,986$ 25,986$ 25,986$ 35,338$Total Costs 50,131$ 37,693$ 9,598$ 50,292$ 50,292$Net Benefits (12,599)$ (11,707)$ 16,388$ (24,306)$ (14,954)$B/C Ratio 0.750.692.710.520.70Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 18.74$ 14.09$ 3.59$ 18.80$ 15.12$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,020$ 2,542$ 167$2 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 1,976$ 2,529$ 164$3 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 1,958$ 2,483$ 163$4 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 1,991$ 2,447$ 165$5 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,040$ 2,413$ 169$6 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,088$ 2,405$ 173$7 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,134$ 2,448$ 176$8 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,182$ 2,507$ 180$9 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,232$ 2,565$ 183$10 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,282$ 2,623$ 187$11 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,333$ 2,682$ 191$12 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,386$ 2,742$ 195$13 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,439$ 2,804$ 199$14 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,494$ 2,867$ 203$15 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,550$ 2,932$ 207$16 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,608$ 2,998$ 212$17 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,666$ 3,065$ 216$18 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,726$ 3,134$ 220$19 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,788$ 3,205$ 225$20 250.6002.790213$ -$ -$ 2,850$ 3,277$ 230$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 2,674.67529.7782,270$ -$ -$ 23,716$ 28,095$ 1,949$NPV - SOC 3,326.62937.0362,824$ -$ -$ 30,049$ 35,412$ 2,465$Page11of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Residential MultifamilyTotal Administrative Cost: (302)$Total Participant Cost: 107,105$Total Incentives Paid: 71,467$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 322,504$ 214,367$ 214,367$ 214,367$ 270,383$Total Costs 107,105$ 322,202$ 71,165$ 106,803$ 106,803$Net Benefits 215,399$ (107,835)$ 143,202$ 107,564$ 163,580$B/C Ratio 3.010.673.012.012.53Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 4.19$ 12.59$ 2.78$ 4.17$ 3.61$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 3,270.38812.200930$ -$ -$ 24,478$ 31,847$ 1,906$2 3,270.38812.200930$ -$ -$ 23,974$ 31,545$ 1,868$3 3,270.38812.200930$ -$ -$ 24,282$ 30,938$ 1,891$4 3,270.38812.200930$ -$ -$ 25,022$ 30,511$ 1,946$5 3,270.38812.200930$ -$ -$ 25,623$ 30,142$ 1,991$6 3,270.38812.200930$ -$ -$ 26,226$ 30,590$ 2,037$7 3,270.38812.200930$ -$ -$ 26,815$ 31,471$ 2,081$8 3,270.38812.200930$ -$ -$ 27,417$ 32,217$ 2,126$9 3,270.38812.200930$ -$ -$ 28,035$ 32,968$ 2,172$10 3,270.38812.200930$ -$ -$ 28,665$ 33,709$ 2,220$11 423.6444.650355$ -$ -$ 3,929$ 4,588$ 321$12 423.6444.650355$ -$ -$ 4,017$ 4,692$ 328$13 423.6444.650355$ -$ -$ 4,108$ 4,797$ 335$14 422.8884.647354$ -$ -$ 4,193$ 4,897$ 341$15 422.8884.647354$ -$ -$ 4,287$ 5,007$ 348$16 405.2234.601351$ -$ -$ 4,208$ 4,912$ 342$17 405.2234.601351$ -$ -$ 4,302$ 5,023$ 349$18 405.2234.601351$ -$ -$ 4,399$ 5,136$ 356$19 405.2234.601351$ -$ -$ 4,498$ 5,251$ 364$20 405.2234.601351$ -$ -$ 4,599$ 5,370$ 371$21 405.2234.601351$ -$ -$ 4,703$ 5,490$ 379$22 405.2234.601351$ -$ -$ 4,809$ 5,614$ 387$23 405.2234.601351$ -$ -$ 4,917$ 5,740$ 395$24 405.2234.601351$ -$ -$ 5,028$ 5,870$ 403$25 405.2234.601351$ -$ -$ 5,141$ 6,001$ 412$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 25,582.391108.8148,294$ -$ -$ 206,072$ 251,038$ 16,077$NPV - SOC 29,556.962131.48610,023$ -$ -$ 241,496$ 292,855$ 18,864$Page12of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Nonresidential MultifamilyTotal Administrative Cost: 140,469$Total Participant Cost: 210,992$Total Incentives Paid: 102,336$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 665,620$ 466,031$ 466,031$ 466,031$ 582,601$Total Costs 210,992$ 806,089$ 242,804$ 351,460$ 351,460$Net Benefits 454,628$ (340,057)$ 223,227$ 114,571$ 231,141$B/C Ratio 3.150.581.921.331.66Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 3.76$ 14.37$ 4.33$ 6.27$ 5.46$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 7,233.03225.0081,904$ -$ -$ 54,159$ 72,266$ 4,205$2 7,233.03225.0081,904$ -$ -$ 53,042$ 71,600$ 4,121$3 7,233.03225.0081,904$ -$ -$ 53,719$ 70,257$ 4,172$4 7,233.03225.0081,904$ -$ -$ 55,352$ 69,353$ 4,294$5 7,233.03225.0081,904$ -$ -$ 56,681$ 68,578$ 4,394$6 7,232.38225.0061,904$ -$ -$ 58,009$ 69,598$ 4,493$7 7,232.38225.0061,904$ -$ -$ 59,312$ 71,588$ 4,591$8 7,232.38225.0061,904$ -$ -$ 60,645$ 73,283$ 4,691$9 7,232.38225.0061,904$ -$ -$ 62,011$ 74,990$ 4,794$10 7,232.38225.0061,904$ -$ -$ 63,405$ 76,675$ 4,898$11 932.2228.276631$ -$ -$ 8,660$ 10,389$ 697$12 932.2228.276631$ -$ -$ 8,855$ 10,623$ 711$13 932.2228.276631$ -$ -$ 9,054$ 10,862$ 726$14 930.1778.269631$ -$ -$ 9,239$ 11,083$ 740$15 930.1778.269631$ -$ -$ 9,446$ 11,332$ 756$16 919.9518.140621$ -$ -$ 9,553$ 11,460$ 763$17 919.9518.140621$ -$ -$ 9,768$ 11,718$ 779$18 919.9518.140621$ -$ -$ 9,987$ 11,981$ 796$19 896.1617.843598$ -$ -$ 9,948$ 11,934$ 791$20 896.1617.843598$ -$ -$ 10,172$ 12,203$ 808$21 352.9643.553271$ -$ -$ 4,097$ 4,914$ 328$22 352.9643.553271$ -$ -$ 4,189$ 5,025$ 334$23 352.9643.553271$ -$ -$ 4,283$ 5,138$ 342$24 352.9643.553271$ -$ -$ 4,379$ 5,254$ 349$25 352.9643.553271$ -$ -$ 4,478$ 5,372$ 356$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 56,076.379213.02916,226$ -$ -$ 449,805$ 563,284$ 34,952$NPV - SOC 64,419.213252.29419,218$ -$ -$ 522,737$ 651,861$ 40,647$Page13of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Residential AgriculturalTotal Administrative Cost: 197$Total Participant Cost: 12,350$Total Incentives Paid: 4,310$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 19,578$ 12,636$ 12,636$ 12,636$ 18,102$Total Costs 12,350$ 19,776$ 4,507$ 12,547$ 12,547$Net Benefits 7,229$ (7,139)$ 8,129$ 89$ 5,555$B/C Ratio 1.590.642.801.011.44Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 9.08$ 14.54$ 3.31$ 9.23$ 7.12$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 945$ 1,235$ 72$2 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 924$ 1,228$ 71$3 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 916$ 1,207$ 70$4 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 932$ 1,191$ 71$5 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 954$ 1,176$ 73$6 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 977$ 1,174$ 75$7 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 999$ 1,195$ 76$8 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 1,021$ 1,224$ 78$9 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 1,044$ 1,252$ 80$10 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 1,068$ 1,280$ 82$11 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 1,092$ 1,309$ 83$12 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 1,116$ 1,339$ 85$13 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 1,141$ 1,369$ 87$14 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 1,167$ 1,400$ 89$15 117.2820.25920$ -$ -$ 1,193$ 1,431$ 91$16 116.1850.24519$ -$ -$ 1,209$ 1,449$ 92$17 116.1850.24519$ -$ -$ 1,236$ 1,482$ 94$18 116.1850.24519$ -$ -$ 1,264$ 1,515$ 96$19 116.1850.24519$ -$ -$ 1,292$ 1,550$ 98$20 116.1850.24519$ -$ -$ 1,321$ 1,584$ 100$21 116.1850.24519$ -$ -$ 1,351$ 1,620$ 103$22 116.1850.24519$ -$ -$ 1,381$ 1,657$ 105$23 116.1850.24519$ -$ -$ 1,412$ 1,694$ 107$24 116.1850.24519$ -$ -$ 1,444$ 1,732$ 110$25 116.1850.24519$ -$ -$ 1,477$ 1,771$ 112$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 1,359.9322.975227$ -$ -$ 12,409$ 15,269$ 948$NPV - SOC 1,761.5223.841293$ -$ -$ 16,547$ 20,247$ 1,263$Page14of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Nonresidential AgriculturalTotal Administrative Cost: 1,671$Total Participant Cost: 112,360$Total Incentives Paid: 26,268$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 95,357$ 57,342$ 57,342$ 57,342$ 78,204$Total Costs 112,360$ 97,027$ 27,938$ 114,030$ 114,030$Net Benefits (17,003)$ (39,685)$ 29,404$ (56,688)$ (35,826)$B/C Ratio 0.850.592.050.500.69Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 16.32$ 14.09$ 4.06$ 16.56$ 13.32$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 4,682$ 6,140$ 352$2 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 4,587$ 6,070$ 345$3 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 4,692$ 5,949$ 352$4 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 4,863$ 5,867$ 365$5 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 4,979$ 5,799$ 374$6 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 5,096$ 5,931$ 383$7 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 5,211$ 6,131$ 391$8 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 5,328$ 6,275$ 400$9 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 5,448$ 6,421$ 409$10 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 5,571$ 6,566$ 418$11 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 5,696$ 6,713$ 428$12 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 5,824$ 6,864$ 437$13 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 5,955$ 7,019$ 447$14 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 6,089$ 7,177$ 457$15 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 6,226$ 7,338$ 468$16 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 6,367$ 7,503$ 478$17 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 6,510$ 7,673$ 489$18 645.7920.1997$ -$ -$ 6,656$ 7,845$ 500$19 629.900--$ -$ -$ 6,634$ 7,820$ 498$20 629.900--$ -$ -$ 6,783$ 7,996$ 509$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 6,884.7962.02373$ -$ -$ 57,269$ 69,089$ 4,301$NPV - SOC 8,559.3302.47189$ -$ -$ 72,659$ 87,261$ 5,456$Page15of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Residential Third PartyTotal Administrative Cost: 292,506$Total Participant Cost: 226,170$Total Incentives Paid: -$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 368,012$ 318,595$ 318,595$ 318,595$ 342,490$Total Costs 226,170$ 660,518$ 292,506$ 518,676$ 518,676$Net Benefits 141,842$ (341,923)$ 26,089$ (200,081)$ (176,186)$B/C Ratio 1.630.481.090.610.66Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 6.46$ 18.87$ 8.36$ 14.82$ 14.82$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 35,007.100479.54936,564$ -$ -$ 282,031$ 368,012$ 23,895$2 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$3 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$4 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$5 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$6 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$7 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$8 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$9 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$10 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$11 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$12 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$13 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$14 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$15 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$16 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$17 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$18 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 35,007.100479.54936,564$ -$ -$ 282,031$ 368,012$ 23,895$NPV - SOC 35,007.100479.54936,564$ -$ -$ 282,031$ 368,012$ 23,895$Page16of17ExhibitHMidAmerican Energy CompanyEEP-08-22012 Gas Summary - Nonresidential Third PartyTotal Administrative Cost: 3,789$Total Participant Cost: 41,223$Total Incentives Paid: 28,391$Ratepayer TotalBenefit/Cost Data Participant Impact Utility Resource SocietalTotal Benefits 76,540$ 39,768$ 39,768$ 39,768$ 51,277$Total Costs 41,223$ 80,330$ 32,180$ 45,012$ 45,012$Net Benefits 35,318$ (40,562)$ 7,588$ (5,244)$ 6,264$B/C Ratio 1.860.501.240.881.14Levelized Cost ($/MMBtu) 8.44$ 16.44$ 6.59$ 9.21$ 7.77$Discount Rate 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 7.90% 4.81%Avoided Avoided AvoidedProduction Transmission Distribution AvoidedEnergy Peak Capacity Capacity Capacity Energy BillYear MMBtu MMBtu Cost Cost Cost Cost Savings Externalities1 525.800--$ -$ -$ 3,897$ 5,080$ 292$2 525.800--$ -$ -$ 3,818$ 5,028$ 286$3 525.800--$ -$ -$ 3,878$ 4,930$ 291$4 525.800--$ -$ -$ 4,003$ 4,862$ 300$5 525.800--$ -$ -$ 4,099$ 4,804$ 307$6 525.800--$ -$ -$ 4,196$ 4,887$ 315$7 525.800--$ -$ -$ 4,290$ 5,035$ 322$8 525.800--$ -$ -$ 4,386$ 5,154$ 329$9 525.800--$ -$ -$ 4,485$ 5,275$ 336$10 525.800--$ -$ -$ 4,586$ 5,393$ 344$11 525.800--$ -$ -$ 4,690$ 5,514$ 352$12 525.800--$ -$ -$ 4,795$ 5,638$ 360$13 525.800--$ -$ -$ 4,903$ 5,765$ 368$14 525.800--$ -$ -$ 5,013$ 5,895$ 376$15 525.800--$ -$ -$ 5,126$ 6,028$ 384$16 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$17 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$18 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$19 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$20 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$21 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$22 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$23 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$24 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$25 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$26 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$27 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$28 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$29 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$30 ---$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$NPV - TRC 4,885.912--$ -$ -$ 39,768$ 48,150$ 2,983$NPV - SOC 5,794.312--$ -$ -$ 47,699$ 57,513$ 3,577$Page17of17ExhibitH