alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CPP Lending Report

NAME OF INSTITUTION

(Including Holding Company Where Applicable) Person to be contacted regarding this report:

The Harbor Bank of Maryland (Harbor 

Bankshares Corporation)

Joseph Haskins, Jr.

UST Sequence Number: 1273

City: Baltimore

State: Maryland

RSSD:

(for Bank Holding Companies)

2008130

Holding Company Docket Number:

(for Thrift Holding Companies)

n/a

FDIC Certificate Number:

(for Depository Institutions)

24015

Loan Activity For: May, 2018

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance (Thousands $) 66,392

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance Key

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance Comment

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance (Thousands$) 147,880

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance Key

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance Comment

Total Outstanding Balance (Thousands $) 214,272

Total Outstanding Balance Key

Total Outstanding Balance Comment

General Market Commentary
CPP Lending Report

NAME OF INSTITUTION

(Including Holding Company Where Applicable) Person to be contacted regarding this report:

OneUnited Bank Kenneth Tse

UST Sequence Number: 97

City: Boston

State: Massachusetts

RSSD:

(for Bank Holding Companies)

Holding Company Docket Number:

(for Thrift Holding Companies)

FDIC Certificate Number:

(for Depository Institutions)

23966

Loan Activity For: May, 2018

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance (Thousands $) 478,752

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance Key

ncludes month-end balances of 1-4 single-family and multi-family residential mortgages, cash reserve loans , 

credit cards and overdrafts.

Average Consumer Outstanding Balance Comment

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance (Thousands$) 8,758

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance Key

ncludes month-end balances of 1-4 single-family and multi-family residential mortgages, cash reserve loans , 

credit cards and overdrafts.

Average Commercial Outstanding Balance Comment

Total Outstanding Balance (Thousands $) 487,510

Total Outstanding Balance Key

Total Outstanding Balance Comment

General Market Commentary
1

The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Northern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-2837

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

Jorge Eduardo Pablo-Lepe, also known *

as Jorge Lopez Cortez, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: March 17, 2005

Filed: March 31, 2005

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Jorge Pablo-Lepe challenges the sentence the

district court1

 imposed after he pleaded guilty to an immigration offense. He argues

that (1) the district court erred in holding the federal Sentencing Guidelines

unconstitutional; and (2) even if the Guidelines are unconstitutional, the court erred

by imposing a discretionary sentence that was unguided by the applicable Guidelines

range.
-2-

These arguments fail. First, during the pendency of this appeal, the Supreme

Court held in United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738, 765-67 (2005), that the federal

Sentencing Guidelines are unconstitutional insofar as they are mandatory, and thus

they are merely advisory; and that appellate courts should review post-Booker

sentences for reasonableness. Second, we find that the sentence imposed was neither

unguided nor unreasonable. The district court took the Guidelines into account by

recognizing the Guidelines range, see United States v. Yahnke, 395 F.3d 823, 824

(8th Cir. 2005) (district courts, while not bound by Guidelines, must take them into

account in sentencing), but the court chose to impose a higher sentence based on

Pablo-Lepe’s history and characteristics, and the need to protect the public from

future harm by him, see Booker, 125 S. Ct. at 764-65 (18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) guides

appellate determination of reasonableness); Yahnke, 395 F.3d at 825-26 (affirming,

as reasonable, sentence based on § 3553(a) factors of history and characteristics of

defendant and need to protect public).

Accordingly, we affirm. 

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29090]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-48-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

October 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 24, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124-1000, filed 
in Docket No CP98-48-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205, 
157.212 and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.212 and 157.216) for authorization to 
upgrade two existing delivery points located in LaCrosse and Monroe 
Counties, Wisconsin, to accommodate natural gas deliveries to Northern 
States Power Company--Wisconsin (NSP), under Northern's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-401-000 pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is 
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Northern proposes to upgrade these delivery points to accommodate 
natural gas deliveries to NSP under currently effective throughput 
service agreements.
    Northern asserts that NSP has requested the upgrade of the existing 
delivery points to provide increased natural gas service to the Fort 
McCoy #1 and LaCrosse #2 town border stations. The estimated 
incremental volumes proposed to be delivered to NSP at these delivery 
points are 3,663 MMBtu on a peak day and 330,284 MMBtu on an annual 
basis. Northern states that the estimated cost to install the delivery 
points is $210,000.
    In addition to the authorization requested herein, Northern states 
that it will construct certain branchline compression on its LaCrosse 
branchline pursuant to the automatic authorization of the blanket 
certificate and Section 157.208(a) of the Commission's Regulations.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29090 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Dominos, Inc. (the
Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter period ended September 7, 2003 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Harry J. SilvermanHarry J. SilvermanChief Financial Officer




Dated: October 22, 2003
Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business
Advisors


Phone (248) 203-0080


Fax (248)
281-0940


30600
Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham
Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.sucpas.com








April 14,
2010








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







Board of
Directors


Mickland,
Inc.


Statesville,
North Carolina





To Whom
It May Concern:





Silberstein
Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed by
Mickland, Inc. of our report dated April 7, 2010, relating to the financial
statements of Mickland, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as of and for the periods
ending December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the period from October 13, 2008
(inception) though December 31, 2009.





Sincerely,




/s/ Silberstein
      Ungar, PLLCSilberstein Ungar, PLLCBingham
      Farms, Michigan






















































































1
|  | 1.  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2.  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/  Wesley    Ramjeet                                                   |   |  August      11, 2010 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
| Wesley      RamjeetPrincipal      Executive Officer and Principal FinancialOfficer |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3275 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3275

  To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow certain funds to be 
 used for incremental costs of incorporating art into facilities, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 9, 2023

 Ms. Hirono (for herself and Mr. Reed) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow certain funds to be 
 used for incremental costs of incorporating art into facilities, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saving Transit Art Resources Act'' 
or the ``STAR Act''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWING ART.

    (a) In General.--Section 5323(h) of title 49, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``or'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) by striking paragraph (2); and
            (3) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2).
    (b) No Special Rule.--Section 5309 of title 49, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (p); and
            (2) by redesignating subsections (q) and (r) as subsections 
        (p) and (q), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
04/25/14

FACT SHEET

WHAT: HomeSafe Georgia, the state program funded by $339 million from the U.S. Treasury’s Hardest Hit 

Fund to help states grappling with home foreclosures due to unprecedented home price declines and 

sustained and higher unemployment. Georgia’s program is targeted to help homeowners avoid foreclosure 

and remain in their homes, and is housed at the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA).

WHAT’S NEW: On Feb. 1, 2014, DCA expanded the eligibility pool: in addition to assisting homeowners who 

are unemployed or underemployed, HomeSafe Georgia now also assists homeowners who have experienced 

other financial hardships, including those associated with military service, death of a spouse, or a medical 

hardship that occurred in the last 36 months.

WHO’S ELIGIBLE: 

• Homeowners who became unemployed or underemployed in the last 36 months may qualify for 

assistance with their mortgage payment. The program can help eligible homeowners who, through no 

fault of their own, became unemployed or underemployed over the most recent 36 months, bring their 

mortgage payments current for up to 12 months, with the balance of the assistance paid over the 

remaining eligible term. NEW: Mortgage payment assistance is available for up to 24 months total, up 

from 18 months previously.

• NEW: Homeowners who can make their mortgage payments now, but have become delinquent, may 

qualify for reinstatement. The delinquency must be related to a military, medical, or death hardship 

that began in the most recent 36 months. A one-time payment of up to 12 mortgage payments is 

available for qualifying homeowners.

• NEW: Homeowners with a permanent reduction of income may qualify for up to $30,000 to reduce 

their mortgage payment to an affordable level. Income reduction due to the death of a spouse, 

permanent disability, or retirement due to unemployment may qualify homeowners for loan term 

modifications made by participating lenders. The lender must be participating in the HomeSafe 

Georgia program.

HOW TO FIND HELP: Visit www.HomeSafeGeorgia.com , call 877-519-4443, or email homesafe@dca.ga.gov.

MEDIA CONTACT: Alison Tyrer, Director of Marketing & Communications, 404-679-0661 or 

Alison.tyrer@dca.ga.gov
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3306SI

_____________ Herbert E. Bundy, * * Appellant, *

* v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern Park Place; Mary Laughlin; Madeline * District of Iowa. Clark; Eilen Liddell; William E. * Wilkins, Sued as William Wilkins; * [UNPUBLISHED] City of Des Moines, IA; Floyd Jones; * Des Moines Human Rights Commission, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: May 7, 1998

Filed: May 12, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Herbert E. Bundy appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit against Park Place and others. Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude an opinion would have no precedential value. We thus affirm the distric t court's dismissal without further discussion. See8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Bundy's motion on appeal for judgment against Madeline Clark.-2-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[4810-25-p] 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

31 CFR Part 30 

RIN 1505-AC09 

TARP Standards for Compensation and Corporate Governance 

AGENCY: Domestic Finance, Treasury. 

ACTION: Interim final rule; correction 

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the preamble of an interim final rule 

that was published in the Federal Register on Monday, June 15, 2009 (74 FR 29394), 

relating to certain standards for compensation and corporate governance applicable to 

financial institutions receiving funds under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Domestic Finance, Treasury 

(202) 927-6618 (not a toll-free number). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

 The interim final rule the preamble of which is subject to these corrections is 

under section 111 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as amended. 

Need for correction 

 As published, the preamble to the interim final rule contains errors that may 

prove to be misleading and are in need of correction. 

Correction of Publication 

 Accordingly, the publication of the interim final rule, which was the subject of FR 

Doc. E9–13868, published on June 15, 2009 (74 FR 28394), is corrected as follows: 

1. On page 28399, column 3, in the preamble under the heading Supplementary 

Information, the first paragraph, line 26 the language “Section 30.10 (Q-10) of the 
2 

Interim Final Rule states that TARP recipients will be subject during the TARP period to 

the bonus limitation requirements based on the total amount of financial assistance 

outstanding under the TARP.” is corrected to read “Section 30.10 (Q-10) of the Interim 

Final Rule states that TARP recipients will be subject during the TARP period to the 

bonus limitation requirements based on the gross amount of all financial assistance 

provided to the TARP recipient, valued at the time the financial assistance was 

received.” 

 2. On page 28403, column 2, in the preamble under the heading Supplementary 

Information, the carryover paragraph, line 33 the language “(15) certain employees 

named in the certification are the SEOs and most highly compensated employees for 

the current fiscal year based on their compensation during the prior fiscal year;” is 

corrected to read “(15) an accurate list of the employees who are the SEOs and most 

highly compensated employees for the current fiscal year has been provided to the 

Treasury;”. 

Dated: ______________ 

___________________________________ 

Herbert M. Allison, Jr. 

Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability
#### Billie E. VAUGHN, Petitioner, v. AERO CORPORATION et al., Respondents.

No. 44552.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 12, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

CARLTON, C. J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE ACCOMPANYING
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,950,244
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,439,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                   165,578
<INVENTORY>                                    476,948
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,212,352
<PP&E>                                     100,706,367
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,125,039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,456,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,444,564
<BONDS>                                     52,309,785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        95,363
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,358,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,456,343
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,510,532
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,697,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,616,722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               194,853
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,222,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,680,739
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,920,957
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,759,782
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,759,782
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        

</TABLE>
#### Grover Cleveland CALDWELL, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-375.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 11, 1970.

Lee R. Horton, Public Defender, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Public Defender, Winter Haven, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2007256EN.01003101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 256/31 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1890/2005 of 14 November 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in the People's Republic of China, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam and terminating the proceeding on imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in Malaysia and the Philippines

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 302 of 19 November 2005](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2005_302_R_TOC)
)

On page 13, in the Annex, under the list of companies:

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | in the 16th row: | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | for | : | ‘KUOLIEN SCREW INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD, Kwanmiao’, | | read | : | ‘KUOLIEN SCREW INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD, Kaohsiung’; | |

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | in the 17th row: | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | for | : | ‘KWANTEX RESEARCH INC, Taipei’, | | read | : | ‘KWANTEX RESEARCH INC, Tainan’; | |

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | in the 21st row: | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | for | : | ‘M & W FASTENER CO. LTD, Kaoshsiung’, | | read | : | ‘M & W FASTENER CO. LTD, Kaohsiung’; | |

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | in the 27th row: | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | for | : | ‘SUMEEKO INDUSTRIES CO. LTD, Kaoshiung’, | | read | : | ‘SUMEEKO INDUSTRIES CO. LTD, Kaohsiung’. | |

---
Exhibit 23.1







March 3, 2017



Consent of Independent Auditor



We hereby consent to the inclusion in this
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 of Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd. of our report dated March 2, 2017,
relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears
in this Annual Report.



We also consent to reference to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP under
the heading “Interests of Experts,” which appears in the Annual Information Form included in this Annual Report on
Form 40-F.









Chartered Professional Accountants










PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Professional
Accountants

111 5 Avenue SW, Suite 3100, Calgary, Alberta,
Canada T2P 5L3

T: +1 403 509 7500, F: +1 403 781 1825, www.pwc.com/ca



“PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
an Ontario limited liability partnership.