### 33416 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices

Abstract: The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the NESHAP at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A, and any changes, or additions to the Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Dc. Owners or operators of the
affected facilities must submit a onetime-only report of any physical or operational changes, initial performance tests, and periodic reports and results. Owners or operators are also required to
maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. Reports are required semiannually at a minimum.

Form Numbers: None. Respondents/affected entities:Owners or operators of small industrialcommercial-institutional steam generating units.

Respondent’s obligation to respond: mandatory (40 CFR part 60, subpart Dc).

Estimated number of respondents: 235 (total).

Frequency of response: Initially, semiannually and occasionally.

Total estimated burden: 159,972 hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).

Total estimated cost: $24,455,624 (per year), includes $9,446,145 annualized capital or operation & maintenance

costs.

Changes in Estimates: There is an increase in both respondent and Agency burden costs from the most recently approved ICR is due to an increase in the number of new or modified sources, and an adjustment in labor rates.

(23) Docket ID Number: EPA–HQ– OECA–2013–0342; Title: NESHAP for Lime Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart AAAAA); ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2072.05, OMB Control Number 2060–0544; ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on March 31,

2014.

Abstract: The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, and any changes, or additions to the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart AAAAA. Owners or operators of the affected facilities must submit a one-time-only report of any physical or operational changes, initial performance tests, and periodic reports and results. Owners or operators are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. Reports are required semiannually at a minimum.

Form Numbers: None. Respondents/affected entities: Lime manufacturing plants.

Respondent’s obligation to respond: mandatory (40 CFR part 63, subpart AAAAA).

Estimated number of respondents: 62 (total).

Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.

Total estimated burden: 14,723 hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).

Total estimated cost: $1,509,024 (per year), includes $124,408 annualized capital or operation & maintenance

costs.

Changes in Estimates: There is an increase in both respondent and Agency burden costs from the most recently approved ICR is due to an increase in
the number of new or modified sources and an adjustment in labor rates.

Dated: May 20, 2013.

Lisa C. Lund, Director, Office of Compliance.

[FR Doc. 2013–13067 Filed 6–3–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**
**AGENCY**

**[FRL—9819–3]**

**Notification of a Public Meeting of the Science Advisory Board** 
**Environmental Justice Technical**
**Guidance Review Panel**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office announces a public meeting of the SAB Environmental Justice Technical Guidance Review Panel to provide advice through the chartered SAB on the agency’s Draft Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis (May 1, 2013)

. **DATES :**  The Environmental Justice Technical Guidance (EJTG) Review Panel public meeting will be held on Wednesday June 19, 2013 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) and on Thursday June 20, 2013 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).

**ADDRESSES :**  The public meeting will be
held at The EPA Potomac Yards Conference Center, One Potomac Yard, 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Room S–1204/06, Arlington, VA 22202.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Any member of the public who wants further information concerning the public meeting may contact Dr. Sue Shallal, Designated Federal Officer (DFO), via telephone at (202) 564–2057 or email at shallal.suhair@epa.gov. General information concerning the SAB can be
found on the EPA Web site at http:// www.epa.gov/sab.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

The SAB was established pursuant to the Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Act (ERDDAA), codified at 42 U.S.C. 4365, to provide independent scientific and technical
advice to the Administrator on the technical basis for Agency positions and regulations. The SAB is a Federal Advisory Committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C., App. 2. The SAB will comply with the provisions of FACA and all appropriate SAB Staff Office procedural policies. Pursuant to FACA and EPA policy, notice is hereby given that the SAB Environmental Justice
Technical Guidance Review Panel will hold a public meeting to discuss the agency’s draft technical document that provides information on how to consider environmental justice in regulatory analysis. This SAB panel will provide advice to the Administrator through the chartered SAB.

Background

The EPA has released for public

comment its Draft Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis (May 1, 2013) (see https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/
2013/05/09/2013-11165/technicalguidance-for-assessing-environmentaljustice-in-regulatory-analysis) The purpose of this draft guidance is to provide EPA analysts with technical
information on how to consider environmental justice (EJ) in regulatory analyses. This draft guidance takes into account the EPA’s past experience in integrating environmental justice into the rulemaking process, and supports the EPA’s ongoing commitment to ensuring the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. The EPA is seeking the advice
of the SAB on the scientific soundness of the guidance provided in this
document.

This draft guidance complements the

EPA’s Interim Guidance on Considering Environmental Justice During the Development of an Action, (http:// www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/resources/policy/considering-ej-inrulemaking-guide-07-2010.pdf ), issued in July 2010, which provides direction on when EJ should be considered during


### 33417 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices

the rulemaking process. In contrast, the Draft Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis begins to address the issue of how to analytically consider EJ in regulatory analysis.

The SAB Staff Office announced to the public through a Federal Register notice published on February 14, 2011 (76 FR 8366) and a second Federal Register notice published on June 3, 2011 (76 FR 32202) that it was soliciting nominations of nationally and internationally recognized scientists to serve on this panel. Additional background on this SAB advisory activity is provided in these notices and at the following URL http:// yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/ fedrgstr

_activites/EJ%20 Technical%20Guidance?Open

Document.

Technical Contacts: Any technical questions concerning EPA’s draft
technical document should be directed to Kelly Maguire at 202.566.2273 or by
email at maguire.kelly@epa.gov.

Availability of Meeting Materials: Prior to the meeting, the review documents, agenda and other materials will be accessible through the calendar link on the blue navigation bar at http://www.epa.gov/sab/.

Procedures for Providing Public Input: Public comment for consideration by EPA’s federal advisory committees and panels has a different purpose from public comment provided to EPA program offices. Therefore, the process for submitting comments to a federal advisory committee is different from the process used to submit comments to an EPA program office. Federal advisory committees and panels, including scientific advisory committees, provide independent advice to EPA. Interested members of the public may submit
relevant written or oral information on the topic of this advisory activity, and/ or the group conducting the activity, for the SAB to consider during the advisory process. Input from the public to the SAB will have the most impact if it provides specific scientific or technical information or analysis for SAB
committees to consider or if it relates to the clarity or accuracy of the technical information. Members of the public wishing to provide comment should contact the DFO directly. Oral

Statements: In general, individuals or groups requesting an oral presentation at a public meeting will be limited to five minutes. Interested parties should contact Dr. Sue Shallal, DFO, in writing (preferably via email) at the contact information noted above by June 12, 2013, to be placed on the list of public speakers for the meeting. Written Statements: Written statements should be supplied to the DFO via email at the contact information noted above by June 12, 2013 for the meeting so that the information may be made available to
the Committee members for their
consideration. Written statements should be supplied in one of the following electronic formats: Adobe Acrobat PDF, MS Word, MS PowerPoint, or Rich Text files in IBM–
PC/Windows 98/2000/XP format. It is the SAB Staff Office general policy to post written comments on the Web page for the advisory meeting or teleconference. Submitters are requested to provide an unsigned version of each
document because the SAB Staff Office does not publish documents with signatures on its Web sites. Members of the public should be aware that their personal contact information, if included in any written comments, may be posted to the SAB Web site. Copyrighted material will not be posted without explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Accessibility: For information on
access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Dr. Sue Shallal at (202) 564–2057 or shallal.suhair@epa.gov. To request accommodation of a disability, please contact Dr. Shallal preferably at least ten days prior to the meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

Dated: May 22, 2013.
Thomas H. Brennan, Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board Staff Office.

[FR Doc. 2013–13188 Filed 6–3–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE**
**CORPORATION**

**Agency Information Collection**
**Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request (3064–**  **0174)**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

**ACTION :**  Notice and request for comment.

**SUMMARY :**  The FDIC, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the renewal of an existing information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). On March 19, 2013 (78 FR 16853), the FDIC solicited public comment for a 60-day period on renewal without change of its ‘‘Interagency Policy Statement on Funding and Liquidity Risk Management’’ (OMB No. 3064–0139). No comments were received. Therefore, the FDIC hereby gives notice of submission of its request for renewal to
OMB for review.

**DATES :**  Comments must be submitted on or before July 5, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments to the FDIC by any of the following
methods:

• http://www.FDIC.gov/regulations/ laws/federal/notices.html.

• Email: comments@fdic.gov Include the name of the collection in the subject line of the message.

• Mail: Gary A. Kuiper (202.898.3877), Counsel, Room NYA– 5046, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20429.

• Hand Delivery: Comments may be hand-delivered to the guard station at the rear of the 17th Street Building (located on F Street), on business days between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.

All comments should refer to the relevant OMB control number. A copy of the comments may also be submitted
to the OMB desk officer for the FDIC: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Gary A. Kuiper, at the FDIC address above.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Proposalto renew the following currentlyapproved collection of information:

Title: Interagency Policy Statement on Funding and Liquidity Risk Management.

OMB Number: 3064–0174. Form Number: None. Affected Public: Insured state
nonmember banks.

Estimated Number of Respondents: Number of respondents: 4,510 total

(11 large (over $20 billion in assets), 298 mid-size ($1–$20 billion), 4,201 small (less than $1 billion)).

Frequency of Response: Annual. Estimated Annual Burden Hours per Response:

Burden under Section 14: 720 hours per

large respondent, 240 hours per midsize respondent, and 80 hours per small respondent.
Burden under Section 20: 4 hours per

month.

Total estimated annual burden: 552,560 hours

General Description of Collection: The policy statement summarizes the principles of sound liquidity risk