alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Donald Jack FIRST, Appellee.

No. 77-1790.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 25, 1978.

Janet Reno, State’s Atty. and Dennis L. Curran, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

Pollack, Spain & O’Donnell, John H. Li-pinski, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

*788PER CURIAM.

This is a criminal prosecution for possession, sale and conspiracy to sell marijuana before the Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida. The trial court dismissed the charges against the defendant Donald First upon his motion under.Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4). The state appeals and contends that the motion was improperly granted. Wé agree and reverse. *State*v. *Davis,*243 So.2d 587 (Fla.1971). See: *State v. Medlin,*273 So.2d 394 (Fla.1973); *State v. Eckroth,*238 So.2d 75 (Fla.1970); *Betancourt v. State,*228 So.2d 124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); *Chariott v. State,*226 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); *Frank v. State,*199 So.2d 117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967).

Reversed and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
House Calendar No. 1

105TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 105–1

IN THE MATTER OF REPRESENTATIVE NEWT GINGRICH--

pages 1201 to 1271
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 59273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29126]



[[Page 59271]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part IV





The President





_______________________________________________________________________



Executive Order 13066--Amendment to Executive Order 13037, Commission 
To Study Capital Budgeting


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 211 / Friday, October 31, 1997 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 59273]]

                Executive Order 13066 of October 29, 1997

                
Amendment to Executive Order 13037, Commission To 
                Study Capital Budgeting

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, and in order to increase the membership of the 
                Commission to Study Capital Budgeting, it is hereby 
                ordered that the second sentence of section 1 of 
                Executive Order 13037 is amended by deleting ``11'' and 
                inserting ``no more than 20'' in lieu thereof. It is 
                further ordered that section 3 of Executive Order 13037 
                is amended by deleting the words ``by March 15, 1998, 
                or''.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    October 29, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97-29126
Filed 10-30-97; 11:55 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
Surface water data

Daiker, Dave 

t

o

:

Jordan Page 01/27/2010 03:19 PM

Jordan,

Please see the attached surface water monitoring reports. Two were conducted by our South Florida

Water Management District/FDEP, while the third was conducted by the USGS and our FDEP. Please let

me know if you need further information and if there is a better way to submit this data.

Thanks again.

Davis H. Daiker, Ph.D.

Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

Scientific Evaluation Section

Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state

officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your

e‐mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure.
# L_2005234EN.01000401.xml

| 10.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 234/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 234/4

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1472/2005

of 9 September 2005

determining to what extent import right applications submitted during the month of August 2005 for certain live bovine animals as part of a tariff quota provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 of 28 July 2005 layng down detailed rules for the application of a tariff quota for certain live bovine animals originating in Bulgaria, provided for in Council Decision 2003/286/EC (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 fixes at 6 600 the number of head of live bovine animals originating in Bulgaria which may be imported under special conditions in the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 fixes at 6 600 the number of head of live bovine animals originating in Bulgaria which may be imported under special conditions in the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006.

| (2) | Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 lays down that the quantities applied for may be reduced. The applications lodged relate to total quantities which exceed the quantities available. Under these circumstances and taking care to ensure an equitable distribution of the available quantities, it is appropriate to reduce proportionally the quantities applied for, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 lays down that the quantities applied for may be reduced. The applications lodged relate to total quantities which exceed the quantities available. Under these circumstances and taking care to ensure an equitable distribution of the available quantities, it is appropriate to reduce proportionally the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

All applications for import certificates lodged pursuant to Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 shall be accepted at a rate of 43,5787 % of the import rates applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 September 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 199, 29.7.2005, p. 33.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CACA 31137; FES 97-33]


Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Needles Resource Area.

ACTION: Notice of Availability for the Castle Mountain Mine Expansion 
Project, Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact 
Report.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as 
amended, and in coordination with the County of San Bernardino in its 
administration of the California Environmental Quality Act as amended, 
notice is hereby given that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has 
prepared, with the assistance of a third party consultant, a Final 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Environmental Impact Report 
(EIR)on the proposed Castle Mountain Mine Expansion Project and has 
made copies available for public and agency review. The Final EIS/EIR 
addresses the potential environmental impacts associated with expansion 
and continued operation of an open pit heap leach gold mine in 
northeastern San Bernardino County, California.

DATES: Comments on the Final EIS/EIR must be received no later than 4 
p.m., November 17, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to: George R. 
Meckfessel, U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management, Needles Resource Area, 
101 West Spikes Road, Needles California 92363.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George R. Meckfessel, Planning and 
Environmental Coordinator, telephone (760) 326-7000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Viceroy Gold Corporation has proposed to 
mine additional ore adjacent to deposits currently being mined at the 
Castle Mountain Mine, an open-pit heap-leach gold mine. Under the 
present operating permits, mining, processing and reclamation could 
continue through December 31, 2010. The mine operating period would be 
extended 10 years past the currently permitted time to 2010. Under the 
proposed expansion, these activities could continue through December 
31, 2020. The Proposed Action would increase areas of open pit, create 
an overburden storage site, and expand the heap leach pad, on 
approximately 485 acres. Mining and processing methods, and rates would 
not change. Previous permitted and proposed surface disturbances at the 
conclusion of mining would total 1,375 acres of the 3,910-acre project 
area.
Molly S. Brady,
Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-27782 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

**HARLEY-DAVIDSON CREDIT CORP.**

 

I,Perry A. Glassgow, Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary ofHarley-Davidson Credit Corp. (“HDCC”), certify that:

 

(i) areview of HDCC’s activities for the period from July 14, 2009 (the closing date of theHarley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2009-2 transaction subject to the requirementsof Regulation AB) through December 31, 2009 (the “Reporting Period”) andof HDCC’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2009 (the “Sale andServicing Agreement”) among Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2009-2,Harley-Davidson Customer Funding Corp., HDCC, and The Bank of New York TrustCompany, N.A., has been made under my supervision; and

 

(ii) tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, HDCC has fulfilled in allmaterial respects all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate in the nameof and behalf of HDCC this 25th day of March 2010.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Perry A. Glassgow                              |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Perry A. Glassgow                                  |
|   |   | Vice President,  Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |
|   |   |                                               |
|   |   |  Harley-Davidson  Credit Corp.                |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3585 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3585

 To amend title 9, United States Code, with respect to arbitration of 
                 disputes involving human trafficking.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 11, 2024

 Mr. Blumenthal (for himself and Mr. Hawley) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 9, United States Code, with respect to arbitration of 
                 disputes involving human trafficking.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES INVOLVING HUMAN TRAFFICKING.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 4 of title 9, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``ASSAULT AND SEXUAL 
        HARASSMENT'' and inserting ``ASSAULT, SEXUAL HARASSMENT, AND 
        HUMAN TRAFFICKING'';
            (2) in section 401--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as 
                paragraphs (2) through (5), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting before paragraph (2), as so 
                redesignated, the following:
            ``(1) Human trafficking dispute.--The term `human 
        trafficking dispute' means a dispute relating to conduct 
        prohibited by--
                    ``(A) chapter 77 of title 18; or
                    ``(B) Tribal or State laws prohibiting human 
                trafficking.''; and
            (3) in section 402(a)--
                    (A) by striking ``dispute or sexual assault 
                dispute'' and inserting ``dispute, sexual assault 
                dispute, or human trafficking dispute''; and
                    (B) by striking ``dispute or the sexual harassment 
                dispute'' and inserting ``dispute, sexual harassment 
                dispute, or human trafficking dispute''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of chapters for 
title 9, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating 
to chapter 4 and inserting the following:

``4. Arbitration of disputes involving sexual assault,          401.''.
                            sexual harassment, and human 
                            trafficking.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Metro-Rural Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sio Kam Seng, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

July 11, 2014



|       |  |                                                           
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/ Sio Kam Seng                                          
|Name:  |  | Sio Kam Seng                                              
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
# L_2005341EN.01011101.xml

| 23.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/111 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/111

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 286 of 28 October 2005
  )

On page 16, in the table, first column:

for: ‘
  8501 34 92, 8501 34 90
  ’,

for

read: ‘
  8501 34 92, 8501 34 98
  ’.

read

On page 608, in the third column, against code 9006 10 10:

for: ‘3,7’,

for

read: ‘Free’.

read

---
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-228-CV

LINDA HALL APPELLANT

V.

OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT 1

------------

On July 16, 2009 and August 4, 2009, we notified appellant, in

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this

appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).
2... See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil

Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007)

(listing fees in courts of appeals).

2

Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the

rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August

28, 2007, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f). 2

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. 

DELIVERED: August 25, 2009
256 La. 1148

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Truman E. MCDONALD v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 51009.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 25, 1970.

ORDER

On considering the petition of relator in the above numbered and entitled cause:

IT IS ORDERED that the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish otf Jefferson, without delay, grant a full evi-dentiary hearing on relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pending in that Court since July 23, 1970, and make a determination of the merits of his application after the hearing.
#### Allen CURB v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50435.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 17, 1978.

Thomas Morris, Morris & Coats, Cleveland, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Catherine W. Underwood, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before SMITH, P. J., LEE and COFER, JJ., and WILLIAM R. LAMB, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, BROOM and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
Regulatory Announcement

EPA Finalizes Transportation 

Conformity Rule Restructuring 

Amendments 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing 

changes to the transportation conformity rule to make the rule 

apply to any future new or revised national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS). 

The final rule restructures two sections of the transportation conformity rule so that 

existing requirements will apply for any new or revised NAAQS. Restructuring these 

sections will reduce the need to amend the rule in the future merely to reference a 

specific NAAQS and will provide more certainty to transportation planners without 

compromising environmental benefits. 

This final rule ensures that air quality is protected and clarifies requirements for 

implementers. 

EPA has worked closely with the U.S. Department of Transportation to develop this 

final rule. 

Background 

Transportation conformity is a Clean Air Act requirement that ensures that federally 

supported highway and transit projects are consistent with state air quality implementation plans. Conformity helps protect public health through early consideration of 

the air quality impacts of transportation decisions in places where air quality does not 

currently meet federal standards or has not met them in the past. 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

EPA-420-F-12-009 

February 2012 
Regulatory Announcement

Key Elements of the Final Rule 

•	 The final rule primarily restructures two sections of the conformity rule, 40 CFR 93.109 

and 93.119, so that the existing rule requirements clearly apply to areas designated for 

future new or revised NAAQS, thus reducing the need to amend the transportation 

conformity rule merely to reference specific new NAAQS. 

•	 As a result of these changes, the conformity rule will apply to any new NAAQS that 

EPA establishes in the future. 

•	 This rule also allows PM2.5 areas with clean air quality data to take advantage of conformity flexibilities that are currently available only to ozone areas. 

Health and Environmental Benefits 

The final rule ensures that transportation activities are consistent with air quality goals of the 

transportation conformity program. The final rule ensures that all nonattainment and maintenance areas use conformity tests that ensure air quality progress continues in areas that need to 

attain or maintain the NAAQS. 

For More Information 

You can access documents on transportation conformity on EPA’s Office of Transportation and 

Air Quality Web site at: 

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/index.htm 

For further information on this final rule, please contact 

Patty Klavon 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality
 

2000 Traverwood Drive
 

Ann Arbor, MI 48105
 

734-214-4476
 

E-mail: klavon.patty@epa.gov
 

Or 

Laura Berry 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality
 

2000 Traverwood Drive
 

Ann Arbor, MI 48105
 

734-214-4858
 

E-mail: berry.laura@epa.gov
 

2
Exhibit
32





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on form 10-KSB for the Year
Ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) by CaminoSoft Corp., the undersigned
hereby certifies that:





1.
            The
      Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and


2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Registrant.











January
9, 2009


/s/ STEPHEN
CROSSON


Stephen
Crosson


Chief
Financial Officer & Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit (h)(xi)

**DWS Investments Fund Accounting Corp.**

Amended Fund Accounting Fee Schedule

Effective July 28, 2008

 

**DWS VALUE SERIES, INC.**

DWS Dreman Mid Cap Value Fund****

 

Fund Accounting Service - Maintain and preserve accounts, books, records and other documents as are required of the Fund under Section 31 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Rules 31a-1 and 31a-2.  Record the current day's trading activity and such other proper bookkeeping entries as are necessary for determining that day's net asset value.  Calculate net asset value.

 

| I. | Annual Fees per Portfolio |
|----|---------------------------|

 

| Fund Net Assets | Annual Fee                                         |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|            |                                               |
| All             | 0.015% of the Fund’s average daily net assets |

 

| II. | Out-of-Pocket Expenses |
|-----|------------------------|

 

A billing for the recovery of applicable out-of-pocket expenses will be made at the end of each month.  Out-of-pocket expenses include, but are not limited to: telephone, courier or delivery service, legal fees, fees for pricing services and all other reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.