alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5624-5625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-237-000]


TransColorado Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

January 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 29, 1997, TransColorado Gas 
Transmission Company (TransColorado0 tendered for filing and acceptance 
the following tariff sheets to its Pro Forma FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, to become effective April 1, 1997:

First Revised Sheet Nos. 202-204
First Revised Sheet Nos. 212-217
First Revised Sheet No. 222
Original Sheet No. 222A
First Revised Sheet Nos. 225 and 226
First Revised Sheet Nos. 230 and 231
Original Sheet No. 231A
First Revised Sheet Nos. 232 and 233
First Revised Sheet Nos. 248 and 249

    TransColorado asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with the Commission's Order No. 587, Final Rule and Order Establishing 
Compliance Schedule, issued July 17, 1996 at Docket No. RM96-1-000.

[[Page 5625]]

TransColorado states that the tendered pro forma tariff sheets revise 
its Tariff to conform to the Commission's amended Regulations which 
standardize business practices and procedures governing transactions 
between interstate gas pipelines, their customers, and others doing 
business with the pipelines.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before February 19, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2913 Filed 2-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Anthony J. ETTARO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2080.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 17, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 28, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jerry L. Schwarz, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The evidence to support the conviction of rape was legally insufficient and the trial court should have granted Defendant’s Motion for judgment of acquittal. *Hollis v.*
      *898
      *State,*27 Fla. 387, 9 So. 67 (1891); *Bowden v. State,*152 Fla. 715, 12 So.2d 887 (1943); *Johnson v. State,*118 So.2d 806 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); *O'Bryan v. State,*324 So.2d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

The Judgment and Sentence are reversed with directions to discharge the Appellant.

REVERSED with directions.

CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
<Page>

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.1(ak)

                                    AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
              SAUER-DANFOSS INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION
                            AND RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN

      1. Paragraph 9.1 of Article 9 of the Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Non-Employee
Director Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (the "Plan") provides that it
may be amended by action of the Board of Directors of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. (the
"Company"). In accordance with the provisions of that paragraph and pursuant to
resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company, the Plan is
hereby amended as follows:

      (a)   The existing subparagraph (iii) of Article 2.(e) is deleted in its
            entirety and new subparagraphs (iii) and (iv) of said Article 2.(e)
            are added to read as follows:

            "(iii) The stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete
                   liquidation of the Company; or

            (iv)   The consummation of: (i) the sale or disposition of all or
                   substantially all of the Company's assets; or (ii) a merger,
                   consolidation, or reorganization of the Company with or
                   involving any other corporation or entity, other than a
                   merger, consolidation, or reorganization that would result in
                   the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately
                   prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining
                   outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of
                   the surviving entity) at least fifty percent (50%) of the
                   combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company
                   (or such surviving entity) outstanding immediately after such
                   merger, consolidation, or reorganization"

      2. The changes made by this Amendment shall not apply to Awards (as
defined in the Plan) that are outstanding under the Plan prior to the date this
Amendment was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company.

                                        The above Amendment was duly adopted by
                                        resolutions passed by the Board of
                                        Directors of the Company at its meeting
                                        held on December 4, 2002


                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Kenneth D. McCuskey, Secretary of
                                        the Company
# L_2005170EN.01003001.xml

| 1.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 170/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 170/30

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1008/2005

of 30 June 2005

amending Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards intervention on the market in butter and cream

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 (2) provides for an intervention system for the buying-in of butter at fixed prices. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 (2) provides for an intervention system for the buying-in of butter at fixed prices.

| (2) | Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 provides for reductions of the intervention prices of butter. It is therefore necessary to specify the intervention price to be used for the calculation of the buying-in price when the intervention price changes. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 provides for reductions of the intervention prices of butter. It is therefore necessary to specify the intervention price to be used for the calculation of the buying-in price when the intervention price changes.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 the following subparagraph is added:

‘The intervention price to be used for the calculation of the buying-in price shall be that in force on the day of manufacture of the butter.’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply as of 1 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

2

---
MISSISSIPPI - AGENCY CONTACTS

MS State MDOT Jeff Ely MDOT Planning Director jely@mdot.ms.gov 601-359-7665

MS FHWA MS FHWA

DO

Don Davis Assistant Division Administrator donald.davis@dot.gov 601-965-4146

MS LPA MS Assoc. of 

Supervisors

Derrick Surrette Executive Director, Mississippi

Association of Supervisors

dsurrette@massup.org 601-353-2741

MS FHWA FHWA EFL Jacinda Russell Access Program Manager jacinda.russell@dot.gov 571-434-1543

MS FHWA FHWA EFL Lewis Grimm Planning Team Leader Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov 703-404-6289

MS LPA Ms Off. State

Aid

Trent Curtis MS Office of State Aid tcurtis@osarc.state.ms.us 601- 359-7946

MS FLMA NPS Kent Cochran Southeast FLHP Coordinator Kent_Cochran@nps.gov 404-507-5725

MS FLMA FWS Jo Ann Clark Regional Coordinator, Refuge

Roads Program

JoAnn_Clark@fws.gov 404-679-4114

MS FLMA FWS Nathan Caldwell US Fish and Wildlife Service

Transit and Trails Coordinator

nathan_caldwell@fws.gov 703-358-2205

MS FLMA USFS Pablo Cruz Director of EngineeringRegion 8Pcruz01@fs.fed.us 404-347-7395

MS FLMA USFS Rosana Barkawi Transportation System

Development

rosanabarkawi@fs.fed.us 703-605-4509

MS FLMA DOD (nonUSACE)Jason Cowin Senior Engineer/HND-SDDCTEA Jason.W.Cowin.civ@mail.mil 618-220-5229

MS FLMA DOD (USACE) Lynn Neher/

Ryan Hartwig

Natural Resources Program

Manager/ Recreation Business

Line Manager

Lynn.N.Neher@usace.army.mil 

Ryan.D.Hartwig@usace.army.

mil

314-331-8880

404-562-5134
#### KILLARNEY FRUIT COMPANY, Appellant, v. W. F. AUSTIN & SONS TRUST, Appellee.

No. 69-559.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
33.3





Management’s
Assertion of Compliance





Management
of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is
responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria specified in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, relating to the servicing of the Honda Auto
Receivables  Owner Trust platform, which is comprised of the Honda
Auto Receivables 2007-1 Owner Trust and Honda Auto Receivables 2009-3 Owner
Trust asset-backed securities transactions (the “Platform”), as of and for the
year ended March 31, 2010.





Management
has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are
applicable in regard to the servicing Platform for the period as
follows:





Applicable Servicing
Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to
the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regard to the
activities performed by the Company, excluding the following servicing criteria:
1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii)-1122(d)(2)(vii),
1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv) (the “Applicable Servicing
Criteria”). With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is
applicable only as it relates to remittances.





Period: Year ended
March 31, 2010 (the “Period”).







With
respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management
provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable
Servicing Criteria:




·
            The
      Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance
      with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria.




·
            The
      Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
      Criteria.   In making this assessment, management used the
      criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph
      (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.




·
            Based
      on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects,
      with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria.




KPMG LLP,
a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with
respect to management’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria, as of and for the Period.





CITIBANK,
      N.A.By:
                    /s/
      Karen MontbachIts:
                    Managing
      DirectorDated:
                    May
      28, 2010
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Mr. Jeremy Taylor 

Regulatory Administration 747/767 Program Manager 

The Boeing Company 

P.O. Box 3707.MC 03-56 

Seattle, W A 98124-2207 

Dear Mr. Taylor: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

We have received your petition letter no. RA-15-0 1262, dated March 24, 2015, on behalf of 

The Boeing Company, requesting an extension of limitation for Exemption No. 11070. That 

exemption provides relief from the requirements of§ 25.939(a), at Amendment 25-40, and 

§ 25.1305(c)(5), at Amendment 25-120, ofTitle 14, Code of Federal Regulations. This 

extension of exemption, if granted, would permit extended time-limited relief from the 

regulations to allow time for Boeing to upgrade ice-crystal icing indicator software on 

Boeing Model 747-8 and -8F airplanes equipped with GEnx-2B engines. 

This request, which you submitted to the Department of Transportation's Federal Docket 

Management System (FDMS), has been added to docket no. FAA-2014-0299. 

We are in the process of reviewing your request and will contact you if we need additional 

information. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Mike Dostert at 425-227-2132, or e-mail mike.dostert@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Mark Forseth 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RAYMOND HILLARY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2362

[March 4, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Steven Levin, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 2016CF00075B.

Raymond Hillary, Sneeds, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.