alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

NY-12 Shirley Chisolm Park Connector Bicycle/Pedestrian 

Facility

National Park Service - 

Gateway National 

Recreation Area- Jamaica 

Bay Unit

NYC Department 

of Tranportation Kings

2020-

2022

NY-13

Wertheim Water Trail Access 

Parking Parking Lot Resurfacing

Fish and Wildlife Service - 

Wertheim National 

Wildlife Refuge

Department of 

Environmental 

Conservation

Suffolk 2020-

2022

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the New York Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the New York FLAP are listed below by application number and include:

New York Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2020-2022

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The New York PDC does not have a firm date for the next Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please watch our website for updates in your 

state. https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/programs-access

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED. CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE
BEEN REDACTED AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE COMMISSION.

                    [LOGO OF SUNRISE TELECOM INCORPORATED]

                       2001 Executive Officers Bonus Plan


Executive Officers will participate in the 2001 Executive Officers Bonus Plan
(the "Executive Officers Bonus Plan") as stated below, subject to approval by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.

Executive Officers
------------------
Paul K. Chang - CEO & President
Paul A. Marshall - COO & VP Marketing
Robert C. Pfeiffer - CTO & VP Engineering
Peter L. Eidelman - CFO & Treasurer


                            2001 Executive Officers
                              Bonus Plan Formula


1.   The Executive Officers Bonus will be based on a percentage of their base
     compensation for the period enrolled in the plan.

2.   The formula will be based on both the year's profit percentage, and sales
     growth percentage.

3.   The bonus formula will include an upside to motivate the Executive Officers
     to achieve exceptional Company financial performance. It will also include
     a downside resulting in no annual bonus awarded.

4.   The bonus can range from 0 to a maximum of 50% times the base salary for
     the period enrolled. The Company maintains the right to reduce the
     calculated amount of the formula to be sure that the employee profit
     sharing plan for the entire Company employees is not reduced while
     benefiting the Executive Officers.

5.   The 2001 goal is to obtain employee profit sharing between 15% to 25% while
     maintaining sales growth in excess of [*] and a net income percentage to
     equal or exceed [*] of sales. The Executive Officers Bonus will only exceed
     25% when employee profit sharing reaches 25%. Executive Officers Bonus
     payments will be accrued in excess of 25% in the event of exceptional
     performance exceeding the stated sales growth and net income percentage
     stated above.

  * Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission.
<PAGE>

6.   In the event of a material corporate reorganization, the formula will need
     to be reevaluated.


7.   Yearly net income, yearly sales, previous year sales are as reported on the
     Company's audited financial statements.


Bonus =   [*]

definitions:
p = year profit % = yearly net income / yearly sales
sg = sales growth percentage = (current year sales - previous year sales) /
     previous year sales

  * Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission.
Secondary Storage Agreement



SECONDARY STORAGE AGREEMENT 
 
By and between Safti-Cell, Inc. (SCI), a Delaware Corporation,
and CRYO-CELL International, Inc. (CCEL). Whereas CCEL is engaged in the field of preservation of stem cells from newborn babies and preserves these stem cells in a primary location at Clearwater, Florida. 
 
And, whereas SCI is building a state-of-the-art facility for
secondary (back up) storage to protect the stem cells stored at the primary location above, 
 
And, whereas the parties are mutually interested in seeing valuable stored specimens endangered by fire, earthquake or any natural or human made disaster, 
 
And, whereas SCI is committed to building a state-of-the-art,
fireproof, earthquake resistant facility for mutual consideration between the parties, it is agreed and the receipt of $10.00 which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed: 
 

	 	1.	 	CCEL will deliver a cryopreserved specimen to SCI for secondary (back up) storage. 

 

	 	2.	 	SCI agrees to maintain storage of delivered specimen in a cryogenic environment. 

 

	 	3.	 	Payments to SCI are in the following categories: 

 

	 	a)	 	If all clients are automatically billed for secondary storage or are provided secondary storage at no extra cost, SCI will store specimens at a cost of $10.00 (Ten
Dollars) each. 

 

	 	b)	 	If secondary storage is offered clients on an optional basis, then in addition to the $10.00, SCI would receive half of the overage over $20.00 for each annual fee.


 

	 	4.	 	In the event retrieval of a specimen is required the contracting parties will mutually agree to the price being charged SCI will first cover its actual cost in labor
+ 10% for overhead and the parties will divide equally the retrieval fee. 

 

	 	5.	 	Transportation cost for the delivery of the back up specimen is the be borne entirely by the client and/or their insurance provider. 

 

	 	6.	 	The parties agree that if CCEL is sold or merged into any company, this contract must be included and accepted as a part of any agreement entered into between CCEL
and a third party. 

 

	 	7.	 	This Agreement is for a period of twenty (20) years during which CCEL will receive 2% equity of all SCI’s net profits from secondary storage regardless of
source. This Agreement will be extended for year periods with mutual consent between the parties. 

 
Dated this     1     day of October, 2001. 
 

	 SAFTI-CELL, Inc.
	 	 	 	 CRYO-CELL International, Inc.

	
	 By:
	 	 /s/    Charles Nyberg

	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/    Wanda D. Dearth


	 	 	 Charles Nyberg
	 	 	 	 	 	 Wanda D. Dearth, President
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ViaVid Broadcasting Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Brian
Kathler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Brian Kathler
----------------------


Brian Kathler
Chief Executive Officer
February 11, 2004



                                       27
#### Katie Marie CHERAMIE et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44057.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 15, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
SERVED: AUGUST 28, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF AIRMEDICAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0552 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014NM070012) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached Service List.

# 0~ Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative La Attachment

- Service List . . . : i L.-,**·--~--** .:SERVICE LIST - BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1 ONE COPY Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel The Aviation Law Firm, 1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway, Suite 300 Annapolis, MD 21401 TEL: 301-294-8550 FAX: 866-568-9886 Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Northwest Mountain Region (ANM-7) 1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0552 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERT GIAMETTA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-359

[May 10, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 562002CF004311A.

Robert Giametta, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Roger POSEY et al., Petitioners, v. Alice Marie TAYLOR, by her next friend, Leon Taylor and Leon Taylor, Individually, Respondents.

No. 44649.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 9, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 283 So.2d 118.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

MO 48 County Road 201 Paving Roadway Resurfacing

National Park Service - 

Ozark National Scenic 

Riverways

Carter County Carter 2019

MO 50 Raising Route 67 Roadway Reconstruction US Army Corps of 

Engineers - Rivers Project MoDOT

Saint 

Charles

2018-

2020

MO 53 State Line Road Stabilization Bank Stabilization & 

Safety Improvements

Fish and Wildlife Service - 

Marais des Cygnes 

National Wildlife Refuge

Bates County Bates

2018-

2019

MO 54 Burnett School Road Bridge Bridge Replacement Forest Service - Mark 

Twain National Forest

Boone & 

Callaway 

Counties

Boone & 

Calloway

2018-

2019

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Missouri Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Missouri FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Missouri Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2017-2020

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The Missouri PDC does not have a firm date for the next 

Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please bookmark our webpage to watch for future Calls for Projects in your state. 

https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/flap/

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28363]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, October 29, 1997.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: October 22, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-28363 Filed 10-22-97; 11:12 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3695 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3695

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to change certain eligibility 
 provisions for loan forgiveness for teachers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2024

 Ms. Stabenow introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to change certain eligibility 
 provisions for loan forgiveness for teachers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Teacher Debt Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. LOAN FORGIVENESS FOR TEACHERS.

    The Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) is 
amended--
            (1) in section 428J(g)(2) (20 U.S.C. 1078-10(g)(2))--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or'' after 
                the semicolon at the end;
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (B); and
                    (C) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as 
                subparagraph (B);
            (2) in section 455(m) (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)), in paragraph 
        (4), by striking ``both this subsection and section 428J, 428K, 
        428L, or 460'' and inserting ``both this subsection and section 
        428K or 428L''; and
            (3) in section 460(g)(2) (20 U.S.C. 1087j(g)(2))--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or'' after 
                the semicolon at the end;
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (B); and
                    (C) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as 
                subparagraph (B).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            40,483
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       2,848
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  44,667
<CASH>                                          30,477
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           4,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,102
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 15,227
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             13,176
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            3,448
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 14,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,102
<PREMIUMS>                                      19,327
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              3,576
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  72
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  31,014
<BENEFITS>                                       7,036
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      8,218
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,211
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,484
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,727
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,071
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  12,671
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              7,503
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                  415
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               1,832
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 3,530
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 15,227
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                            415



</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32.2**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                DAVID ROBERTSON      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | David                Robertson               |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer  |
#### Burton SHENKEL, Appellant, v. Cyrus A. NEUMAN, Appellee.

No. 70-1251.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 15, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11563

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MARIO PEREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CV

- 542 USDC No. 4:15

- CR

- 271

- 11

Before DENNIS, ELROD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mario Perez, federal prisoner # 50701

- 177 , pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine , and he was sentenced to 3 40 months of imprisonment. T he district court denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion on the
merits without holdin g an evidentiary hearing

. Perez now seeks a certificate of appealability (COA).

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 22, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11563 Document: 00515426648 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/22/2020No. 18

- 11563

2 Perez contends that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to the inclusion of certain information in the factual basis for his plea, by promising he would receive a sentence of no more than 10 years of imprisonment, by significantly underestimating his sentencing exposure, by failing to object to the district court’s failure to adequately explain its reasons for awarding only a limited departure fro m the guidelines range , and for failing to object to the limited extent of th at departure. H e also argues that the district court erred by not holding an evidentiary hearing on his claim s

. This court will grant a COA, which is required to appeal, only when the movant “has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). “A petitioner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court’s resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller

- El
, 537 U.S. at 327.
Perez has not made the requisite showing. In addition, w e lack jurisdiction to consider claims that were not presented to the district court

. See Black v. Davis , 902 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2018), cert. denied , 140 S. Ct. 859 (2020)

. Perez ’s motion for a COA is denied.
We construe the motion for a COA with respect to the district court’s failure to hold an evidentiary hearing as a direct appeal of that issue, see Norman v. Stephens , 817 F.3d 226, 234 (5th Cir. 2016), and affirm. CO A DENIED; AFFIRMED. Case: 18-11563 Document: 00515426648 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/22/2020
#### Maurice LAMAR v. STATE.

2 Div. 195.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 24, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 21, 1978.

After remandment, AFFIRMED on authority of the Supreme Court of Alabama, S.C. 2769, dated December 9, 1977, 356 So.2d 680. No opinion.