52452 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND

BUDGET

Cancellation Pursuant to Line Item

Veto Act; Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998

October 6, 1997.

One Special Message from the

President under the Line Item Veto Act

is published below. The President

signed this message on October 6, 1997.

Under the Act, the message is required

to be printed in the Federal Register (2

U.S.C. 691a(c)(2)).

Clarence C. Crawford,

Associate Director for Administration.

To the Congress of the United States:

In accordance with the Line Item Veto Act,

I hereby cancel the dollar amounts of

discretionary budget authority, as specified

in the attached reports, contained in the

‘‘Military Construction Appropriations Act,

1998’’ (Public Law 105–45; H.R. 2016). I have

determined that the cancellation of these

amounts will reduce the Federal budget

deficit, will not impair any essential

Government functions, and will not harm the

national interest.

William J. Clinton.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

October 6, 1997.

Cancellation No. 97–4

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $2,650 thousand for

Military Construction, Army project

‘‘Live Fire Command and Control

Facility, Fort Irwin, California’’ on page

17 of House Report 105–247 dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct a command and control

facility to execute the tactical,

administrative, and safety functions in

brigade-level live fire operations. The

project includes a helicopter landing

pad, radio relay rooms, and supporting

infrastructure. The project is being

canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, Fort Irwin will be able to

continue to operate and train using

existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal years:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥1

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥0

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥3

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$2,650 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Live Fire Command and

Control Facility, Fort Irwin (Military

Construction, Army).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: California, 40th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

California: one; 40th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–5

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $8,500 thousand for

Military Construction, Army project

‘‘Rotational Wash Point, Fort Irwin,

California’’ on page 17 of House Report

105–247 dated September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would provide a central, 24 bay wash

facility for wheeled and tracked vehicles

to supplement existing wash facilities.

The project is being canceled because:

(1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

Fort Irwin will be able to continue to

operate using existing wash facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices 52453

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥3

2000 ............................................. ¥2

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥9

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$8,500 thousand

in FY 1998

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Fort Irwin Rotational Wash

Point (Military Construction, Army).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: California, 40th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

California: two; 40th District: two.

Cancellation No. 97–6

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1 (A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $10,100 thousand for

Military Construction, Navy project,

‘‘Waterfront Operations Building,

Coronado Naval Amphibious Base,

California’’ on page 17 of House Report

105–247 dated September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C), (E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct facilities for Explosive

Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit Three

(EODMU THREE), including two

buildings and a harbor area to provide

protection for the Marine Mammal

Program. The project is being canceled

because: (1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

EODMU THREE will be able to continue

to operate and train using existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥4

2000 ............................................. ¥3

2001 ............................................. ¥2

2002 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥10

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$10,100

thousand in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Coronado Naval Amphibious

Base Waterfront Operations Building

(Military Construction, Navy).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: California, 49th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

California: three; 49th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–7

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $6,690 thousand for

Military Construction, Naval Reserve

project ‘‘Marine Corps Reserve Center,

Pasadena, California’’ on page 17 of

House Report 105–247 dated September

9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct a new Marine Corps

Reserve Center for the 4th Light AntiAir Defense (LAAD) Battalion and

demolish existing facilities. The project

is being canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, the 4th LAAD Battalion will

be able to continue to operate using

existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥2

2000 ............................................. ¥2

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥7

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$6,690 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.
52454 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Pasadena Marine Corps

Reserve Center (Military Construction,

Navy).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: California, 27th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

California: four; 27th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–8

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $16,000 thousand for

Military Construction, Army project

‘‘Railyard Expansion (Phase I) Fort

Carson, Colorado’’ on page 17 of House

Report 105–247 dated September 9,

1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would remove existing rail, turnouts

and crossings and construct 26,400 feet

of new track, including turnouts and

crossings. The project would also

construct a new remote loading facility,

rail engine maintenance facility,

warehouse and associated facilities. The

project is being canceled because: (1) it

was not requested in the President’s FY

1998 Budget; (2) it would not

substantially improve the quality of life

of military service members and their

families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

Fort Carson will be able to continue to

operate using existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥3

1999 ............................................. ¥5

2000 ............................................. ¥4

2001 ............................................. ¥3

2002 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥16

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$16,000

thousand in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Fort Carson Railyard

Expansion (Phase I) (Military

Construction, Army).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Colorado, 5th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Colorado: one; 5th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–9

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $17,940 thousand for

Military Construction, Navy project

‘‘Pier Improvements, Mayport Naval

Station, Florida’’ on page 18 of House

Report 105–247 dated September 9,

1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would provide dredging and pier

improvements to increase the number of

larger berths for homeported and

visiting ships. The project is being

canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, Mayport Naval Station will

be able to continue to operate using

existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥8

2000 ............................................. ¥5

2001 ............................................. ¥3

2002 ............................................. ¥1

2003 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥18

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$17,940

thousand in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Mayport Naval Station, Pier

Improvements (Military Construction,

Navy).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Florida, 4th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Florida: one; 4th District: one.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices 52455

Cancellation No. 97–10

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $1,300 thousand for

Military Construction, Navy project

‘‘Runway Upgrades, Whiting Field,

Florida’’ on page 18 of House Report

105–247, dated September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would extend one runway and acquire

a clear zone for another. A longer

runway and clear zone are required for

the new Beech MKII training aircraft,

scheduled to arrive in FY 2002. The

project is being canceled because: (1) it

was not requested in the President’s FY

1998 Budget; (2) it would not

substantially improve the quality of life

of military service members and their

families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

Whiting Field will be able to continue

to operate using existing runways.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal Year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥1

2000 ............................................. ¥0

2001 ............................................. ¥0

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥1

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$1,300 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Runway Upgrades, Whiting

Field (Military Construction, Navy).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Florida, 1st

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Florida: two; 1st District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–11

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $6,800 thousand for

Military Construction, Air Force project

‘‘HH–60 Rescue Operations Facility,

Moody Air Force Base (AFB), Georgia’’

on page 18 of House Report 105–247,

dated September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would provide a facility to support

combat search and rescue training and

pararescue training operations when

this mission relocates from Patrick AFB.

The project is being canceled because:

(1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Since this new mission

has not yet relocated from Patrick AFB,

cancellation of this project will not

affect ongoing operations at Moody

AFB.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥2

2000 ............................................. ¥2

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥7

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$6,800 thousand

in FY1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): HH–60 Rescue Operations

Facility, Moody AFB (Military

Construction, Air Force).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Georgia, 2nd

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Georgia: one; 2nd District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–12

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $9,500 thousand for

Military Construction, Navy project

‘‘Asian Pacific Center, Fort Derussey,

Hawaii’’ on page 19 of House Report

105–247, dated September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would provide new space for the AsianPacific Center for Security Studies. The
52456 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices

Center provides facilities and programs

for national officials and military

officers to explore pressing issues

regarding the security environment of

the Asian-Pacific region. The project is

being canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, the Navy will continue to

be able to operate the Center in existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥4

2000 ............................................. ¥3

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥10

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$9,500 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Fort Derussey Asian-Pacific

Center (Military Construction, Navy).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Hawaii, 1st

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Hawaii: one; 1st District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–13

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $9,200 thousand for

Military Construction, Air Force project

‘‘B–1B Avionics Building (Bldg),

Mountain Home Air Force Base (AFB),

Idaho’’ on page 19 of House Report 105–

247, dated September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would provide a new facility for Air

Expeditionary Wing’s avionics repair.

The facility would be used for an

electronic countermeasure pod shop,

low altitude navigation and targeting

infrared for night (LANTIRN) shop, and

other avionics repair and test functions.

The project is being canceled because:

(1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

avionics functions at Mountain Home

AFB will be able to continue to operate

using existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥3

2000 ............................................. ¥3

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥9

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$9,200 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): B–1B Avionics Building

Mountain Home AFB (Military

Construction, Air Force).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Idaho, 2nd

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Idaho: one; 2nd District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–14

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $3,750 thousand for

Military Construction, Air Force project

‘‘F–15C Squadron Operations Facility,

Mountain Home Air Force Base (AFB),

Idaho’’ on page 19 of House Report 105–

247, dated September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would provide a facility to plan, brief

and critique combat crews and to direct

flight operations. The project also would

demolish the existing operations

facility, built in 1970. The project is

being canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, F–15C squadrons at

Mountain Home AFB will be able to
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices 52457

continue to operate using existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥1

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥4

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$3,750 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): F–15C Squadron Operations

Facility Mountain Home AFB (Military

Construction, Air Force).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Idaho, 2nd

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Idaho: two; 2nd District: two.

Cancellation No. 97–15

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $4,120 thousand for

Military Construction, Navy project

‘‘Chemical-Biological Warfare Detection

Center, Crane Naval Surface Warfare

Center, Indiana’’ on page 20 of House

Report 105–247, dated September 9,

1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would provide a new maintenance,

overhaul and engineering support

facility for shipboard chemical/

biological warfare detection devices, to

replace a smaller, existing facility. The

project is being canceled because: (1) it

was not requested in the President’s FY

1998 Budget; (2) it would not

substantially improve the quality of life

of military service members and their

families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center will

be able to continue to operate using

existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥2

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥4

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$4,120 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Chemical-Biological Warfare

Detection Center, Crane Naval Surface

Warfare Center (Military Construction,

Navy).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Indiana, 8th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Indiana: one; 8th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–16

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $8,913 thousand for

Military Construction, Air Force Reserve

project ‘‘Base Civil Engineer Complex,

Grissom Air Reserve Base, Indiana’’ on

page 20 of House Report 105–247, dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would provide a new base civil engineer

complex to include maintenance shops,

warehouse storage, and a roads and

grounds facility. The project is being

canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, Grissom Air Reserve Base

will be able to continue to operate using

existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥3

2000 ............................................. ¥3

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥9
52458 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$8,913 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Grissom Air Reserve Base

Civil Engineer Complex (Military

Construction, Air Force Reserve).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Indiana, 5th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Indiana: two; 5th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–17

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $2,850 thousand for

Military Construction, Air Force project

‘‘Transportation Complex, McConnell

Air Force Base (AFB), Kansas’’ on page

20 of House Report 105–247, dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would provide a new transportation

complex, including a vehicle operations

administration facility and vehicle

parking facility. The project is being

canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, McConnell AFB will be

able to continue to perform

transportation functions using existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥1

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥0

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥3

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$2,850 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): McConnell AFB

Transportation Complex (Military

Construction, Air Force).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Kansas, 4th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Kansas: one; 4th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–18

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $9,900 thousand for

Military Construction, Army project

‘‘Tactical Equipment Shop (Phase II),

Fort Campbell, Kentucky’’ on page 20 of

House Report 105–247, dated September

9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would provide a vehicle maintenance

shop and storage for a forward support

battalion and combat support hospital.

The project also would demolish

facilities currently used for vehicle

maintenance. The project is being

canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, Fort Campbell will be able

to continue to operate using existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥2

1999 ............................................. ¥3

2000 ............................................. ¥2

2001 ............................................. ¥2

2002 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥10

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits Budget

Authority: ¥$9,900 thousand in FY

1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Fort Campbell Tactical

Equipment Shop (Phase II) (Military

Construction, Army).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Kentucky, 1st

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Kentucky: one; 1st District: one.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices 52459

Cancellation No. 97–19

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $7,200 thousand for

Military Construction, Army project

‘‘Qualification Training Range (QTR),

Fort Knox, Kentucky’’ on page 20 of

House Report 105–247, dated September

9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would modernize Heins Rifle Range to

a new standard Qualification Training

Range with a total of 28 firing lanes. The

project would construct three control

towers, a headquarters building, two

general instruction buildings, and other

supporting facilities. The project is

being canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, Fort Knox will be able to

continue to operate using existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥2

2000 ............................................. ¥2

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥7

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$7,200 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Fort Knox Qualification

Training Range (Military Construction,

Army).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Kentucky, 2nd

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Kentucky: two; 2nd District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–20

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $2,610 thousand for

Military Construction, Navy project

‘‘Maintenance Hangar, St. Inigoes Naval

Electronic Systems Engineering

Activity, Maryland’’ on page 21 of

House Report 105–247 dated September

9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would provide additional hangar space

to support maintenance operations on

unmanned air vehicles. The project is

being canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, the St. Inigoes Naval

Electronic Systems Engineering Activity

will be able to continue to operate using

existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥1

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥0

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥3

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$2,610 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Maintenance Hangar, St.

Inigoes Naval Electronic Systems

Engineering Activity, Maryland

(Military Construction, Navy).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Maryland, 5th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Maryland: Maryland one; 5th District:

one.

Cancellation No. 97–21

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $4,500 thousand for

Military Construction, Air Force project,

‘‘Add/Alter Airmen Dining Facility,

Malmstrom Air Force Base (AFB),

Montana,’’ on page 22 of House Report

105–247 dated September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any
52460 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would add dry and cold storage and

alter the equipment and food

preparation areas of the current facility.

The project is being canceled because:

(1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

Malmstrom AFB will be able to

continue to operate using existing

dining facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥2

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥5

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$4,500 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Addition/Alterations to the

Airmen Dining Facility, Malmstrom

AFB (Military Construction, Air Force).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Montana, 1st

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Montana: one; 1st District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–22

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $1,950 thousand for

Military Construction, Air Force project

‘‘Munitions Maintenance Facility, Nellis

Air Force Base (AFB), Nevada’’ on page

22 of House Report 105–247 dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct a larger, replacement

facility to support the inspection,

assembly and testing of explosive

munitions used by training aircraft. The

project is being canceled because: (1) it

was not requested in the President’s FY

1998 Budget; (2) it would not

substantially improve the quality of life

of military service members and their

families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

Nellis AFB will be able to continue to

operate using existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[in millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥1

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥0

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥2

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$1,950 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Nellis AFB Munitions

Maintenance Facility (Military

Construction, Air Force).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Nevada, 2nd

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Nevada: one; 2nd District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–23

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $6,900 thousand for

Military Construction, Army project

‘‘Launch Complex Revitalization, White

Sands Missile Range, New Mexico’’ on

page 23 of House Report 105–247 dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would repair launch facilities for the

Patriot, Stinger, Chaparral and HAWK

missiles, as well as for the Multiple

Launch Rocket System (MLRS) and

Army Tactical Missile Systems

(ATACMS). The project would also

construct a new personnel support area

and test support facility. The project is

being canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, White Sands will be able to

continue to operate in existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices 52461

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥2

2000 ............................................. ¥2

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥7

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$6,900 thousand

in fiscal year: 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): White Sands Missile Range

Launch Complex Revitalization

(Military Construction, Army).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: New Mexico, 2nd

District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above: New

Mexico: one; 2nd District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–24

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $14,000 thousand for

Military Construction, Air Force project

‘‘Flight Simulation Training Facility,

Kirtland Air Force Base (AFB), New

Mexico’’ on page 23 of House Report

105–247 dated September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct a new theater air

simulation facility to support command

and control; weapons system research,

development, testing and evaluation;

and training. The project is being

canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, Kirtland AFB will be able

to continue to operate and train using

existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[in millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥2

1999 ............................................. ¥5

2000 ............................................. ¥4

2001 ............................................. ¥2

2002 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥14

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$14,000

thousand in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Kirtland AFB Flight

Simulation Training Facility (Military

Construction, Air Force).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: New Mexico, 1st

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above: New

Mexico: two; 1st District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–25

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $9,000 thousand for

Military Construction, Army project

‘‘Aerial Gunnery Range (Phase I), Fort

Drum, New York’’ on page 23 of House

Report 105–247 dated September 9,

1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would provide a target range for joint

rotary and fixed wing operations,

replacing the two existing ranges at Fort

Drum. The project is being canceled

because: (1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

units at Fort Drum will be able to

continue to operate using the existing

ranges.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥3

2000 ............................................. ¥2

2001 ............................................. ¥2

2002 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥9

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$9,000 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.
52462 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Fort Drum Aerial Gunnery

Range. (Phase I) (Military Construction,

Army).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: New York, 24th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above: New

York: two; 24th District: two.

Cancellation No. 97–26

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $2,100 thousand for

Military Construction, Air Force Reserve

project ‘‘Consolidated Training Facility,

Niagara Falls IAP, New York’’ on page

23 of House Report 105–247 dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct one building to house

the readiness office and combat arms

training space. The facility would

replace two older buildings. The project

is being canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, Niagara Falls units will be

able to continue to operate and train

using existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥1

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥0

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥2

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$2,100 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Niagara Falls IAP

Consolidated Training Facility (Military

Construction, Air Force Reserve).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: New York, 27th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above: New

York: three; 27th District: two.

Cancellation No. 97–27

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $7,900 thousand for

Military Construction, Army project

‘‘Military Operations on Urbanized

Terrain (MOUT) Training Complex

(Phase I) Fort Bragg, North Carolina,’’ on

page 23 of House Report 105–247 dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct part of an MOUT

training complex, consisting of 32

buildings with streets, parking, a bridge,

and associated support facilities. The

project is being canceled because: (1) it

was not requested in the President’s FY

1998 Budget; (2) it would not

substantially improve the quality of life

of military service members and their

families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

forces at Fort Bragg will be able to

continue to train using existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[in millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:.

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥2

2000 ............................................. ¥2

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥8

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: Ø$7,900 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Fort Bragg, MOUT Training

Complex (Phase I) (Military

Construction, Army).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: North Carolina, 7th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

North Carolina: one; 7th District: one.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices 52463

Cancellation No. 97–28

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $6,000 thousand for

Military Construction, Army Reserve

project ‘‘U.S. Army Reserve Center/

Organizational Maintenance Shop

(OMS)/Area Maintenance Support

Activity (AMSA) (Phase I) Oakdale,

Pennsylvania’’ on page 24 of House

Report 105–247 dated September 9,

1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct a new Army Reserve

training facility to house multiple

training missions, including

communications security and

deployable medical systems. The project

is being canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, Oakdale Army Reserve

units will be able to continue to operate

and train using existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥3

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥6

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits Budget

Authority: ¥$6,000 thousand in FY

1998 .

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Oakdale, Army Reserve

Center/ OMS/AMSA (Phase I) (Military

Construction, Army Reserve).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Pennsylvania, 20th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Pennsylvania: one; 20th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–29

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $13,980 thousand for

Military Construction, Naval Reserve

project ‘‘Reserve Hangar and Training

Center, Johnstown, Pennsylvania’’ on

page 24 of House Report 105–247 dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct a Marine Corps Reserve

Training Center and an aircraft

maintenance hangar to upgrade the

current facilities. The project is being

canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, units at the Johnstown Joint

Reserve Facility will be able to continue

to operate and train using existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥5

2000 ............................................. ¥4

2001 ............................................. ¥3

2002 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥14

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$13,980

thousand in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Marine Corps Reserve Center

and Aircraft Maintenance Hangar,

Johnstown (Military Construction,

Navy).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Pennsylvania, 12th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Pennsylvania: two; 12th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–30

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $3,823 thousand for

Military Construction, Army National

Guard project ‘‘Regional Simulation

Center, Leesburg Training Site

(Eastover), South Carolina’’ on page 25

of House Report 105–247 dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any
52464 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct a 48,000 sq. ft. battle

simulation center to replace a 4,200 sq.

ft. facility. The project is being canceled

because: (1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

area Army National Guard units will be

able to continue to train using existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥1

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥4

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$3,823 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments Upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Leesburg Regional

Simulation Center (Military

Construction, Army National Guard).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: South Carolina, 2nd

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

South Carolina: one; 2nd District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–31

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016)

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $5,200 thousand for

Military Construction, Army National

Guard project, ‘‘Aviation Support

Facility, Rapid City, South Dakota,’’ on

page 25 of House Report 105–247 dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would provide new hangar,

administrative, maintenance, classroom,

and other space to support UH–1 and C–

12 aircraft used by the 1085th Medical

Air Ambulance Company. The project is

being canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, the Rapid City Army

National Guard will be able to continue

to operate and train using existing

maintenance facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[in millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥1

2000 ............................................. ¥2

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥5

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$5,200 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Military Aviation Support

Facility, Rapid City (Military

Construction, Army National Guard).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: South Dakota, 1st

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

South Dakota: one; 1st District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–32

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $9,900 thousand for

Military Construction, Air Force project

‘‘Atmospheric Air Dryer Facility,

Arnold Air Force Base (AFB),

Tennessee,’’ on page 25 of House Report

105–247 dated September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct an air dryer facility to

replace the existing facility. The new

facility would support the mission of

the Propulsion Wind Tunnel (PWT)

facility for the F–22 and Joint Strike

Fighter (JSF) next generation aircraft.

The PWT performs aerodynamic testing

which requires dry air for simulating

flight conditions. The project is being

canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, Arnold AFB will be able to

continue to operate and test using

existing dryer facilities.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices 52465

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥3

2000 ............................................. ¥3

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥10

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$9,900 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Atmospheric Air Dryer

Facility, Arnold AFB (Military

Construction, Air Force).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Tennessee, 4th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Tennessee: one; 4th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–33

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $7,700 thousand for

Military Construction, Army project,

‘‘Ammunition Supply Point Expansion

(Phase II), Fort Bliss, Texas,’’ on page 25

of House Report 105–247 dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would provide 11 ammunition

magazines, a surveillance workshop,

inert storage facilities, an equipment

storage and maintenance facility, and an

above ground petroleum, oils and

lubricants (POL) dispensing facility.

This is phase two of a relocation of this

function from the main post to

McGregor Range. The project is being

canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, Fort Bliss will be able to

continue to operate using existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥2

2000 ............................................. ¥2

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥8

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$7,700 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Ammunition Supply Point

Expansion (Phase II), Fort Bliss (Military

Construction, Army).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Texas, 16th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Texas: one; 16th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–34

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $10,000 thousand for

Military Construction, Air Force project,

‘‘B–1 Squadron Operations(Ops)/

Aircraft Maintenance Unit, Dyess Air

Force Base (AFB), Texas,’’ on page 25 of

House Report 105–247 dated September

9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would provide a consolidated B–1B

squadron operations facility, including

space for flight operations, maintenance,

storage and training functions. The 13th

Bombardment Squadron(BS) is standing

up at Dyess and will operate out of

temporary facilities until a new facility

is constructed. The 9th BS currently

operates out of six buildings. The

consolidated facility would house both

squadrons. The project is being canceled

because: (1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

squadrons at Dyess AFB will be able to

continue to operate using existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥4
52466 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices

Outlay changes—Continued

[In millions of dollars]

2000 ............................................. ¥3

2001 ............................................. ¥2

2002 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥10

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$10,000

thousand in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Consolidated B–1B Squadron

Operations and Aircraft Maintenance

Facility, Dyess AFB (Military

Construction, Air Force).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Texas, 17th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Texas: two; 17th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–35

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $4,800 thousand for

Military Construction, Air Force project,

‘‘Corrosion Control Facility, Laughlin

Air Force Base (AFB), Texas,’’ on page

25 of House Report 105–247 dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would provide a new facility for

painting T–1A, T–37 and T–38 aircraft.

The project is being canceled because:

(1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

Laughlin AFB will be able to continue

to operate using existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥2

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥5

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$4,800 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Corrosion Control Facility,

Laughlin AFB (Military Construction,

Air Force).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Texas, 23rd

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Texas: three; 23rd District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–36

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $12,714 thousand for

Military Construction, Army Reserve

project ‘‘U.S. Army Reserve Center

(USARC), Organizational Maintenance

Shop (OMS), Camp Williams, Utah,’’ on

page 26 of House Report 105–247 dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct a new Reserve Center,

Organizational Maintenance Shop

(OMS), and a warehouse to replace

facilities that would be lost if a

proposed 11 acre transfer of property to

the University of Utah occurred. A new

site for relocation has not yet been

identified. The project is being canceled

because: (1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

Fort Douglas (Camp Williams) Army

Reserve Units will be able to continue

to operate and train using existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥5

2000 ............................................. ¥3

2001 ............................................. ¥2

2002 ............................................. ¥2

Total ......................................... ¥13

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$12,714

thousand in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Fort Douglas, U.S. Army
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices 52467

Reserve Center and OMS Relocation

(Military Construction, Army Reserve).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Utah, 2nd

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Utah: one; 2nd District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–37

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $4,000 thousand for

Military Construction, Navy project ‘‘Air

Operations Building, Norfolk Naval Air

Station, Virginia’’ on page 26 of House

Report 105–247 dated September 9,

1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would provide a new air operations

facility, including an air traffic control

facility, radar tower and supporting

infrastructure. The existing facility

would be demolished. The project is

being canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, Norfolk Naval Air Station

will be able to continue to operate using

existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥2

Outlay changes—Continued

[In millions of dollars]

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥4

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$4,000 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Norfolk Naval Air Station,

Air Operations Facility (Military

Construction, Navy).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Virginia, 2nd

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Virginia: one; 2nd District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–38

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $19,910 thousand for

Military Construction, Navy project

‘‘Waterfront Improvements, Norfolk

Naval Shipyard, Virginia’’ on page 26 of

House Report 105–247 dated September

9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would provide a new wharf for ship

repair and demolish two abandoned

shipbuilding ways and two buildings.

The project is being canceled because:

(1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

the Norfolk Naval Shipyard will be able

to continue to operate using existing

facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥1

1999 ............................................. ¥8

2000 ............................................. ¥6

2001 ............................................. ¥3

2002 ............................................. ¥1

2003 ............................................. ¥1

Total ......................................... ¥20

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$19,910

thousand in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Waterfront Improvements,

Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Virginia

(Military Construction, Navy).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Virginia, 2nd

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Virginia: two; 2nd District: two.

Cancellation No. 97–39

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $3,290 thousand for

Military Construction, Navy project,

‘‘Tomahawk Magazine, Yorktown Naval

Weapons Station, Virginia,’’ on page 26
52468 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices

of House Report 105–247 dated

September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs. This project

would provide an earth covered

magazine for storage of Tomahawk

missiles. The project is being canceled

because: (1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

Yorktown Naval Weapons Station will

be able to continue to operate using

existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥1

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥0

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥3

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$3,290 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Tomahawk Magazine,

Yorktown Naval Weapons Station

(Military Construction, Navy).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Virginia, 1st

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Virginia: three; 1st District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–40

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary

Budget Authority: $6,828 thousand for

Military Construction, Army National

Guard project ‘‘Armed Forces Reserve

Center, Camp Dawson, West Virginia’’

on page 27 of House Report 105–247

dated September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would provide an expanded facility for

several Army National Guard units. The

new, enlarged facility would provide

administrative, training, exercise and

storage space. The project is being

canceled because: (1) it was not

requested in the President’s FY 1998

Budget; (2) it would not substantially

improve the quality of life of military

service members and their families; and

(3) architectural and engineering design

of this project has not started, making it

unlikely that these funds can be used for

construction during FY 1998. Without

this project, Army National Guard units

at Camp Dawson will be able to

continue to operate and train using

existing facilities.

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥2

2000 ............................................. ¥2

2001 ............................................. ¥2

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥7

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$6,828 thousand

in FY1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Armed Forces Reserve

Center, Camp Dawson, West Virginia

(Military Construction, Army National

Guard).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: West Virginia, 1st

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

West Virginia: one; 1st District: one.

Cancellation No. 97–41

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR

AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY

BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto

Act, P.L. 104–130

Bill Citation: ‘‘Military Construction

Appropriations Act, 1998’’ (H.R. 2016).

1(A). Dollar Amount Item of

Discretionary Budget Authority: $4,200

thousand for Military Construction, Air

Force Reserve, project ‘‘Aerial Port

Training Facility, Mitchell Air Reserve

Station (ARS)(Milwaukee), Wisconsin’’

on page 27 of House Report 105-247

dated September 9, 1997.

1(B). Determinations: This

cancellation will reduce the Federal

budget deficit, will not impair any

essential Government functions, and

will not harm the national interest.

1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation;

Facts, Circumstances, and

Considerations Relating to or Bearing

upon the Cancellation; and Estimated

Effect of Cancellation on Objects,

Purposes, and Programs: This project

would construct an aerial port training

facility to replace existing, smaller

facilities. The project is being canceled

because: (1) it was not requested in the

President’s FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would

not substantially improve the quality of

life of military service members and

their families; and (3) architectural and

engineering design of this project has

not started, making it unlikely that these

funds can be used for construction

during FY 1998. Without this project,

Mitchell ARS will be able to continue to

provide training using existing facilities.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / Notices 52469

1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and

Budgetary Effect of Cancellation: As a

result of the cancellation, Federal

outlays will not increase, as specified

below. This will have a commensurate

effect on the Federal budget deficit and,

to that extent, will have a beneficial

effect on the economy.

Outlay changes

[In millions of dollars]

Fiscal year:

1998 ............................................. ¥0

1999 ............................................. ¥2

2000 ............................................. ¥1

2001 ............................................. ¥1

2002 ............................................. ¥0

Total ......................................... ¥4

1(F). Adjustments to Defense

Discretionary Spending Limits

Budget Authority: ¥$4,200 thousand

in FY 1998.

Outlays: The estimated outlay effect

for each year is shown above.

Evaluation of Effects of These

Adjustments upon Sequestration

Procedures: If a sequestration were

required, such sequestration would

occur at levels that are reduced by the

amounts above.

2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.

2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.

2(A). Governmental Function/Project

(Account): Aerial Port Training Facility,

Mitchell Air Reserve Station (Military

Construction, Air Force Reserve).

2(B). States and Congressional

Districts Affected: Wisconsin, 4th

Congressional District.

2(C). Total Number of Cancellations

(inclusive) in Current Session in each

State and District identified above:

Wisconsin: one; 4th District: one.

[FR Doc. 97–26938 Filed 10–6–97; 4:32pm]

BILLING CODE 3110–01–P