alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 12, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1886

Lower Tribunal No. 04-9765

________________

Robert Marlin, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Jack Burstein, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Vivianne Del 

Rio, Judge.

MSP Recovery Law Firm, and Robert Strongarone; Shulman Bastian 

Friedman & Bui, LLP, and Franklin J. Contreras, Jr. (Irvine, CA), for 

appellants.

Scott Jay Feder, P.A., and Scott Jay Feder, for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/ ROBERT J. HALLIDAY                              
|                      |  |  |  | Robert J. Halliday                                  
|                      |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Eva Mae McCREA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-615.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 26, 1974.

Rehearing Denied March 26, 1974.

Bergstresser & DuVal, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

*18Before CARROLL, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was charged by information with second degree murder, of her husband by shooting him with a pistol. She was tried by a jury, which returned a verdict of guilty, and was so adjudged by the court. On her appeal therefrom it is contended the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. We have reviewed the record, and although the evidence was in conflict in certain respects, we agree with the view necessarily taken by the trial court in denying the defendant’s motions for acquittal and for new trial, that the verdict arrived at by the jury had the support of competent substantial evidence, taking into consideration the quantum of proof required in such case.

Affirmed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESAR AUGUSTO PAJUELO

CHAVARRIA; ELILA APONTE DE

PAJUELO; et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-74058

Agency Nos. A072-400-068

 A073-123-163

 A073-123-164

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Cesar Augusto Pajuelo Chavarria, his wife, Elila Aponte de Pajuelo, and

their daughter, natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s

FILED

APR 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-74058

decision denying their application for asylum and withholding of removal. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, INS

v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n.1 (1992), and we deny the petition for

review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that petitioners failed

to establish past persecution or an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution

on account of a protected ground, because they did not demonstrate that the

persons who attempted to force Chavarria to divulge accounting information were

motivated by more than a personal dispute. See Molina-Morales v. INS, 237 F.3d

1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2001) (personal retribution is not persecution on account of a

protected ground). Accordingly, petitioners’ asylum claim fails.

Because Chavarria failed to establish asylum eligibility, it necessarily

follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of

removal. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Q Eastern Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle

i visit terling, VA 20166-6511
US.Department Highway Division Sterling, 1016
of Transportation

Federal Highway
Administration

SENT VIA ELECTRONIC CORRESPONDENCE
MAY - 1 2013 In Reply Refer to: HFPP-15

Ms. Sherri LeBas

Secretary

Louisiana Department of Transportation
and Development

1201 Capitol Access Road

Baton Rouge, LA 70802

Subject: _MAP-21 Access Program Programming Decisions Committee Members
Dear Ms. LeBas:

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141,
includes the establishment of the new Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP). This new
program will be administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Federal
Lands Highway. Louisiana is served by the Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD)
office in Sterling, Virginia.

A key requirement for implementing the FLAP is to coordinate the establishment of a three
member Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for programming the FLAP
funds allocated to each state. Each state level PDC consists of a representative from the Federal
Lands Highway Division office, the State Department of Transportation, and an organization or
entity that is suited to represent the local entities responsible for building, operating, or
maintaining transportation facilities that are located on, are adjacent to, or provide access to
Federal lands. Our program managers have coordinated with your department and have
identified the following positions that will fulfill the PDC requirement:

FLAP Program Manager, FHWA, EFLHD

Transportation Planning Administrator, Louisiana Department of Transportation and
Development

Director, Louisiana Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP) Transportation Research
Center


Additional information on the implementation of FLAP can be found on the EFLHD MAP-21
website at http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/federal-lands-access.aspx. If you have any
questions, please contact Mr. David Payne at 571-434-1543 or David.Payne@dot.gov, or myself
at 703-404-6276 or Karen.Schmidt@dot.gov.

Sincerely yours,

dam D-Dchoniidm

Karen A. Schmidt
Director, Office of Program Administration

ce:

Ms. Marie Walsh, Director, Louisiana LTAP Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA

Ms. Robin Romeo, Transportation Planning Administrator, Louisiana Department of
Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, LA

Mr. Charles W. Bolinger, Division Administrator, FHWA, Louisiana Division Office, Baton
Rouge, LA

Ms. Mary Stringfellow, Program Delivery Team Leader, FHWA, Louisiana Division,
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________ No. 07 - 14 - 00245 - CR

________________________ STEVEN EDWARD BOYD , APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 47 th District Court Randall County, Texas Tri a l Court No. 24,143 -

A ; Honorable Dan Schaap , Presiding August 1 , 201 4 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant, Steven Edward Boyd, was convicted of robbery and is pursuing this appeal pro se. The Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right to Appeal filed in the case reflects that Appellant's case is a plea - bargained case with no right of appeal and that Appellant waived the right of appeal. The certification notwithstanding, Appellant filed a notice of appeal challenging his conviction.2

By letter dated June 27, 2014, this Court notified Appellant of the consequences of the certification and invited him to either file an amended certification showing a right to appeal or demonstrate oth er grounds for continuing the appeal on or before July 17, 2014. On July 16 , 2014, Appellant filed a response indicating as grounds for continuing his appeal that he had meritorious issues pending in the trial court and was awaiting information on appointment of counsel for purposes of this appeal. Appellant’s response notwithstanding, he has not filed an amended certification reflecting a right of appeal nor established good cause for continuing this appeal. Consequently, we have no alternative b ut to dismiss the appeal based on the certification signed by the trial court. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 25.2(d). Patrick A. Pirtle Justice Do not publish.
[Paths]
[Defaults]
Org_name=Western Federal Lands Highway Division
Signature_block=0
QualityLevel=PWL
[Gui]
[ReportPresentation]
Points=12
StandardFont=Times New Roman
StandardBoldFont=Times New Roman Bold
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-907 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CIVIL AVIATION 

Transport Services 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CROATIA 

Signed at Washington February 3, 2011 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 CROATIA 

Civil Aviation: Transport Services 

 Agreement signed at Washington 

 February 3, 2011; 

 Entered into force September 7, 2011. 

 With annexes.
June 10, 2015 

Mr. Ryan Murphy 

5990 SW Pacific Boulevard 

Albany, OR 97321 

 

Dear Mr. Murphy: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 14, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1576), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Anthony Joseph DELANO and John C. Bolash, Relators, v. Murray GOODMAN, as Judge of the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County, Florida, Division “D”, Respondent.

No. 69-1100.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 7, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3817 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3817

 To increase the criminal penalties for assaulting a Bureau of Prisons 
                         correctional officer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2024

Mrs. Blackburn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To increase the criminal penalties for assaulting a Bureau of Prisons 
                         correctional officer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safer Prisons Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCED PENALTIES FOR ASSAULT ON BUREAU OF PRISONS 
              CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS.

    Section 111 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Enhanced Penalties for Assault on Bureau of Prisons 
Correctional Officers.--In the case of any violation of this section 
against a correctional officer of the Bureau of Prisons, the applicable 
maximum term of imprisonment under this section shall be doubled, and 
the applicable maximum fine shall be adjusted accordingly.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 9779.

#### Bullock *v.*Bullock, Exr.

(Decided October 16, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Greene County.

*575
      *Mr. M. J. Hartley,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. M. A. Broadstone*and *Mr. T. L. Magruder,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
No. 9694.

#### The Northern Ohio Railway Co. *v.*The Akron Canal & Hydraulic Co.

(Decided December 21, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Summit County.

*Messrs. Tibbals & Frank,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Allen, Waters & Andress,*for defendant-in error.

Judgment, affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
P.1 

OAR Box 1103 

Prepped by Ryan Dugan 

Document Number: 

88) lll-A-5 

Docket Number: 

A-83-41 

Printed 4/11/2008 1:50:51 PM Sheet 88 of 174 
P.2 

. xyVP4-n 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

[FRL- 3 

RIN-2060-AE61 

Billing Code 6560-50-P 

Federal Radiation Protection Guidance for 

Exposure of the General Public 

AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of extension of comment period for proposed 

recommendations. 

SUMMARY: In response to several requests, EPA is extending the 

comment period for thirty (30) days on the proposed recommendations for the new guidance to Federal agencies in their 

formulation of regulations and conduct of programs for the 

protection of the general public from exposure to ionizing 

radiation. 

DATES: The comment period originally given in the previous 

notice on Friday, December 23, 1994 (59 FR 66414), has been 

extended for thirty (30) days. Written comments in response to 

this notice must be received on or before March 31; 1995, to be 

ensured full consideration. ' 

ADDRESSES: Written comments (in duplicate) should be submitted 

to: Central Docket Section (6102J), Room M1500 at Waterside Mall, 

Attn: Docket No. A-83-41, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

... • . , nT HV0 90S609ZZ0Z XVd Sf-}1 301 S6/TZ/Z0 

J00IP1 " 
P.3 

'2 

Washington, DC 20460. The docket section is open to the public 

between 8:00 am to 5:00 pm on weekdays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allan C.B. Richardson, Deputy 

Director for Federal Guidance, or Eleanor Thornton, Program 

Analyst, Criteria and Standards Division, Office of Radiation and 

Indoor Air (6602J) , U.S. EPA, Washington, DC 20460, telephone 

(202) 233-9213; FAX (202) 233-9629 concerning this extension. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice does not effect the 

public hearing dates as noted in the previous notice issued 

December 23, 1994, (59 FR 66414). All other aspects of this 

rulemaking remains the same. 

Dated: Flej. //"" /? ? 

>ls 

Assistant Administrator for 

Air and Radiation 

nT MV0 S0S609ZZ0Z XVi 6*:H HILL S6/TZ/Z0 

COO® ' U1 —
June 9, 1999 Refer to: HMHSCC50A 

Mr. Dean C. Alberson, P. E.

Safety Quest, Inc.

1805 B Briar Oaks Drive

Bryan, TX 77802

Dear Mr. Alberson:

In your June 1, 1999 letter to Mr. Richard Powers of my staff, you requested the Federal

Highway Administration’s (FHWA) acceptance of a modified version of the Wide-REACT crash

cushion without additional testing. You noted that the modified design is intended to shield

objects as wide as 3048 mm whereas my letter to Dr. John F. Carney at Worchester Polytechnic

Institute on June 16, 1998 accepted a design for a 2743 mm wide unit. The only change to the

original design was moving each of the two rows of 915-mm diameter polyethylene cylinders

outward 150 mm and lengthening the cross strut by approximately 300 mm. This also resulted in

a minor shortening of the total system length. The overall dimensions of both units are shown in

the enclosure. We agree that this minor change is not likely to have any significant effect on

impact performance. 

We have noted also that this system was originally called the Wide REACT but you now wish to

re-designate it as the Medium REACT. Thus, the Medium REACT with 915-mm diameter

cylinders may be considered acceptable for use on the National Highway System in either of the

widths noted above when such use is requested by a transportation agency.

 

 Sincerely yours,

 (original signed by Dwight A. Horne)

 Dwight A. Horne

 Director, Office of Highway Safety

Infrastructure

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-236-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

January 30, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 27, 1997, Northwest Pipeline 
Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in 
Appendix A to the filing, to become effective February 27, 1997, except 
for Original Sheet No. 273-A which has a proposed effective date of 
October 1, 1995.
    Northwest states that this filing is submitted to make several 
minor revisions to Northwest's tariff, including: (1) Canceling Rate 
Schedule T-1, (2) incorporating a revenue crediting mechanism related 
to revenue credits received from Questar Pipeline Company for storage 
at Clay Basin, (3) updating Northwest's list of marketing affiliates, 
(4) removing provisions requiring a prepayment fee if firm service is 
requested, (5) changing from monthly to annual distribution of penalty 
revenue credits applicable to unauthorized overrun or underrun 
penalties, (6) removing obsolete tariff provisions and (7) making other 
general ``housekeeping'' changes.
    Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
Northwest's customers and interested state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest this filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance 
with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and 
Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided in 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2778 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3640 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3640

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 155 South Main Street in Mount Clemens, Michigan, as the ``Lieutenant 
               Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT COLONEL ALEXANDER JEFFERSON POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 155 South Main Street in Mount Clemens, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lieutenant 
Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```