alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.8b

                                    AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                                 TRIBUNE COMPANY
                          EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Company hereby amends the Tribune
Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan by deleting the first paragraph of Section
17 in its entirety and, in lieu thereof, replacing that paragraph with the
following:

17.  TERMINATION. This Plan, and all rights of employees under any offering
hereunder, shall terminate upon the first to occur of:

     (a)  the date on which the Committee determines that the total number of
          Shares then available for sale under the Plan is not sufficient to
          meet all unfilled purchase requirements; or

     (b)  the date on which the Plan is terminated by the Board of Directors of
          Tribune Company.

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Company is
hereby authorized and empowered to take all steps necessary to effect the
foregoing resolution, including the execution, filing and delivery of such
documents as may be required by law or as may be deemed necessary or proper in
connection with the matters set forth in these resolutions.

                                  *   *   *

I, Mark W. Hianik, Assistant Secretary for Tribune Company, hereby certify that
the foregoing is a correct copy of resolutions duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of Tribune Company on May 7, 2002.


                                                      /s/ Mark W. Hianik
                                                      ------------------
                                                          Mark W. Hianik
# L_2005139EN.01002901.xml

| 2.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 139/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 139/29

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 830/2005 of 30 May 2005 amending, for the fifth time, Council Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 imposing certain restrictive measures in support of effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 137 of 31 May 2005
  )

On page 24, Article 2:

for:

‘This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.’,

read:

‘This Regulation shall enter into force on 8 June 2005.’

---
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

**Waterfowl Identification in the Central Flyway**

##       Redhead    

----

**Male - Winter**
****

**Body:** Medium-sized duck, 2 - 2 1/2 pounds, 20-22 inches     long. Back and sides grayish. Chest and rump black. Belly white. Head rounded     and rusty red. Bill gray with white band toward tip. Feet gray. Eyes lemon     yellow. **Wings:** Grayish brown with faint white flecking. Speculum     dull pearl gray with faint white trailing edge. **Voice:** Deep     *meow* or *purr***In Flight:** Rapid wingbeat.     Flock usually flies low in well-formed V. White belly contrasts with black     chest and red head.   

**Male - Fall**
****

 Ranging from brownish gray with faint reddish head and neck to blotchy near-winter     appearance. Eyes, bill, feet and wings same as in winter.   

**Female - All Seasons**
****

**Body:** Mottled gray-brown with dusky white belly. Pale area     at base of bill and around dark brown eyes. Bill and feet similar to male     but lighter. **Wings:** Similar to male but less flecking. **Voice:**     Loud *squawk* or *quack.*

****

----

Previous Section
Return to Contents
Next Section

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/waterfwl/redhead.htm		Page Contact Information: Webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 03-Aug-2006 11:32:16 EDT		Sioux Falls, SD [sdww54]
# L_2005103EN.01004101.xml

| 22.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 103/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 103/41

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 611/2005 of 20 April 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 823/2000 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices between liner shipping companies (consortia)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 101 of 21 April 2005
  )

On page 11, the signature is replaced as follows:

for:

‘
  For the Commission

Neelie KROES

Member of the Commission
  ’

read:

‘
  For the Commission

José Manuel BARROSO

The President
  ’.

---
Mail Envelope Properties (4628F324.F8C: 4: 12192) 

Subject: 

Creation Date: 

From: 

Created By: 

Recipients 

GWIA.MDEDOM 

Baltimorel Cecil County 8hr Ozone State Implementation Plans 

4/20/07 1 :06PM 

Brian Hug 

bhug@mde.state.md.us 

"ali.mirzakhalili@state.de. us" (ali.mirza 

"cripps.christopher@epa.gov" (cripps.chri 

"kotsch.martin@epa.gov" (kotsch.martin@ep 

baltometro.org> 

<stomlinson «stomlinson@baltometro.org» 

dc.gov> 

<rama. tangirala «rama. tangirala@dc.gov» 

dep.state.nj.us 

Sandy.Krietzman (Sandy Krietzman) 

dep.state.nj. us> 

<Christine. Schell «Christine.Schell@dep. 

deq. virginia.gov> 

<damcleod «damcleod@deq. virginia.gov» 

<jesydnor (<jesydnor@deq.virginia.gov» 

epa.gov 

morris.makeba (morris.makeba@epa.gov) 

mde.state.md.us 

MDEP02.MDEDOM 

aheltibridle CC (Andrew Heltibridle) 

bhug CC (Brian Hug) 

dfranks CC (Diane Franks) 

drabin CC (Debbie Rabin) 

gabum CC (Tad Aburn) 

jwilkinson CC (Jim Wilkinson) 

rcarroll CC (Randall Carroll) 

rrnosier CC (Randy Mosier) 

rthunell CC (Roger Thunell) 
mdot. state.md. us 

hsimons (Hsimons@mdot.state.md.us) 

mwcog.org 

jrohlfs (Joan Rohlfs) 

state. pa. us> 

<jhavens (<jhavens@state. pa. us» 

wilmapco.org> 

<bswiatek «bswiatek@wilmapco.org» 

wvdep.org 

fdurham (Fred Durham (E-mail)) 

Post Office 

GWIAMDEDOM 

MDEP02.MDEDOM 

Files 

MESSAGE 

Balt Hearing.DOC 

Cecil Hearing.DOC 

Options 

Expiration Date: 

Priority: 

Reply Requested: 

Return Notification: 

Concealed Subject: 

Security: 

Size 

7848 

26112 

26112 

None 

Standard 

No 

None 

No 

Standard 

Route 

baltometro.org> 

dc.gov> 

dep.state.nj.us 

dep.state.nj.us> 

deq. virginia. gOY> 

epa.gov 

mde.state.md. us 

mdot.state.md. us 

mwcog.org 

state. pa. us> 

wilmapco.org> 

wvdep.org 

Date & Time 

04/20/07 01:06PM 

04/18/07 03:36PM 

04/18/07 03:36PM
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55630-55631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28338]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application Tendered for Filing With the Commission

October 21, 1997.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Subsequent License.
    b. Project No.: P-2927-004.
    c. Date Filed: September 29, 1997.
    d. Applicant: Aquamac Corporation.
    e. Name of Project: Aquamac Hydro Project.
    f. Location: On the Merrimack River in Essex County, near Lawrence, 
Massachusetts.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Gerald J. Griffin, Aquamac Corporation, 9 
South Canal Street, Lawrence, MA 01842, (508) 686-0342.
    i. FERC Contact: Mark Pawlowski (202) 219-2795.
    j. Comment Date: 60 days from the issuance date of this notice.
    k. Description of Project: The existing run-of river project 
utilizes flows diverted by the upstream Lawrence Hydro Project and 
consisting of: (1) a trashrack structure; (2) manually operated 
headgate and penstock; (3) a single 250-kW generating unit; and (4) 
appurtenant facilities. There is no dam and reservoir associated with 
the project. The applicant estimates that the total average annual 
generation would be 1,600 Mwh. All generated power is sold to the 
Merrimac Paper Company for its manufacturing processes.
    l. With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the 
MASSACHUSETTS STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER (SHPO), as required 
by Sec. 106, National Historic Preservation Act, and the regulations of 
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR 800.4.
    m. Pursuant to Section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's 
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or

[[Page 55631]]

person believes that an additional scientific study should be conducted 
in order to form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of 
the application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or 
person must file a request for a study with the Commission not later 
than 60 days from the issuance date of this notice and serve a copy of 
the request on the applicant.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28338 Filed 10-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### Ben CEPHUS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1181.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 19, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dominos, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 10, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Brandon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. BrandonDavid A. BrandonChief Executive Officer


Dated: October 9, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dominos, Inc. and will be retained by Dominos, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 371 

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 

to provide research and extension grants to combat plant pests and 

noxious weeds that impact coffee plants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself and Mr. SCHATZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade 

Act of 1990 to provide research and extension grants 

to combat plant pests and noxious weeds that impact 

coffee plants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coffee Plant Health 

5 Initiative Amendments Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COFFEE PLANT HEALTH INITIATIVE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1672(d) of the Food, Ag8 riculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 371 IS

1 5925(d)) is amended by striking paragraph (9) and insert2 ing the following: 

3 ‘‘(9) COFFEE PLANT HEALTH INITIATIVE.— 

4 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Research and exten5 sion grants may be made under this section for 

6 the purposes of— 

7 ‘‘(i) developing and disseminating 

8 science-based tools and treatments to com9 bat plant pests and noxious weeds that im10 pact coffee plants; 

11 ‘‘(ii) establishing an areawide inte12 grated pest management program in areas 

13 affected by, or areas at risk of being af14 fected by, plant pests or noxious weeds 

15 that impact coffee plants; 

16 ‘‘(iii) surveying and collecting data on 

17 coffee plant production and health; 

18 ‘‘(iv) investigating coffee plant biol19 ogy, immunology, ecology, genomics, and 

20 bioinformatics; and 

21 ‘‘(v) conducting research on— 

22 ‘‘(I) factors that may contribute 

23 to or be associated with coffee plant 

24 immune systems; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 371 IS

1 ‘‘(II) other serious threats to cof2 fee plants, including the sublethal ef3 fects of insecticides, herbicides, and 

4 fungicides on insects and plants bene5 ficial to coffee plant growth; and 

6 ‘‘(III) the development of miti7 gating and preventative measures to 

8 improve habitat conservation and best 

9 management practices in coffee-grow10 ing regions. 

11 ‘‘(B) DEFINITION OF NOXIOUS WEED; 

12 PLANT PEST.—In this paragraph, the terms 

13 ‘noxious weed’ and ‘plant pest’ have the mean14 ings given those terms in section 403 of the 

15 Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7702).’’. 

16 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

17 1672(h) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and 

18 Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5925(h)) is amended by 

19 striking ‘‘2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2035’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Greg
Ness, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 3, 2009



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    J. GREG NESS                  
|J. Greg Ness                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer
CFLHD CENTERLINE REFERENCE

AND TERRAIN VERIFICATION SPECIFICATIONS

I Check existing control:

(a) Perform observations of existing CFLHD control monuments and compare the results to the PS&E 

Survey Control Sheet;

(b) Analyze the data to determine if the control meets CFLHD standards and;

(c) Notify the Survey Manager if the control fails to meet CFLHD standards.

II Set centerline reference points at 100 foot (30m) intervals, according to the following:

(a) Use substantial monumentation (oak hub, steel pin, etc.) that will maintain horizontal and vertical 

integrity through the anticipated construction project;

(1) Set monuments to within 0.10 foot (30mm) of the true horizontal and vertical position relative 

to the CFLHD control monuments;

(2) Monuments may be set on either side of the alignment as field conditions allow in order to 

make the references practical;

(3) A single reference monument may be set at the radius point for small curves where practical 

and;

(b) Set 1”x 2”x 18” pine guard stake painted white at reference hubs and marked with the centerline 

station and offset distance to centerline.

III Map the corridor according to CFLHD Mapping Ground Topography and Planimetric Specifications

and provide the following:

(a) Process the data and create a 3D MicroStation® CAD .map file showing all planimetric features 

and contours and;

(b) Create a Geopak® .TIN file for the corridor.

IV Provide additional control to supplement existing CFLHD control according to CFLHD Accuracy 

Standards by Type of Survey for 5000 Series Supplemental Control. The additional control is to be set 

outside construction limits, such that the monuments will remain stable and usable for the entire 

construction project.

V Update the PS&E Survey Control Sheet, to include the 5000 Series Supplemental Control, according 

to the CFLHD Survey Control Sheet Specifications.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-65454) of PDVSA Finance Ltd. And Petroleos de
Venezuela, S.A. of our report dated February 14, 2003 relating to the financial
statements of LYONDELL-CITGO Refining LP, which appears in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of PDV America, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
December 8, 2003
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T Aug . 19, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 8

- 1 6 8 6 7 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 0

- 0 0 8 0 5

- C R

- A J

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

R A M O N A H E R N A N D E Z ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( A u g u s t 1 9 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e B L A C K , B A R K E T T a n d K R A V I T C H , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :
S h e r y l J

. L o w e n t h a l , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r R a m o n a H e r n a n d e z , h a s f i l e d am o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w o n a p p e a l s u p p o r t e d b y a b r i e f p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v
.

C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. B e c a u s e o u r
i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t ,

c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d H e r n a n d e z ’ s c o n v i c t i o n s a n d

s e n t e n c e s a r e A F F I R M E D

.

2
# October 2008 - February 2010
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
ASIF M UHAM M ED a

nd FAR HANA ASIF, Pe t i tione rs,
v. JEFFER SON B . SESSIONS III, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R e sponde nt. No. 14-70685 Age n c y Nos. A079-628-793

A079-628-794
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Argue d a nd Subm itte d

June 13, 2018 San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : SC HR OEDER , EB EL, ** an d OW EN S, C irc uit Judge s. Pe titione rs Asif M uha

m m e d a nd Fa rhana Asif, na tive s and c itiz e ns of Pakista n, pe t ition for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ s (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing the ir untim e ly m otion to re ope n ba se d on c ha nge d c ountry

c onditions. W e 

# FIL ED JUN 29 2018 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The Honora

ble David M
. Ebe l , Unite d State s C irc uit Judge for the U.S. C ourt of Appe a l s for the Te nth C irc uit, sitting by de signa tion.re vie w the B IA’ s de nia l of the m otion to re ope n for a buse of disc re tion, se e N ajmabadi v . Holde r , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th C ir. 2010), a nd de ny the pe tition. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in c o nc luding tha t Pe titione rs ha

ve fa ile d to show m a te ria lly

c ha nge d c ountry

c o nditions in Pa

kista n. Pe titione rs
argue that Am e ric ans a

nd W e ste rne rs fa c e signific a nt risks in tra

ve ling to Pa

kista n . Suc h risks, howe ve r, we re doc um e nte d in the re c ord at Pe titione rs’ m e rits he aring. Pe titione rs’ ne we vide n c e shows a c ontinua tion of thesa

m e c onditions a

nd doe s not qua lita

tive l y diffe r from

the e vide nc e the y pre se nte d origina lly
. Se e Salim v

. Ly nc h , 831 F.3d 1133, 1137 (9th C ir. 2016). Pe titione r M uh am

m e d a lso a rgue s his fa

m ily would be the ta

rge t of viole nc e
on a c c o unt of his form e r e m ploy m e nt with W e ste rn oil c om pa nie s, but this
argum e nt ha s be e n c onside re d a nd re je c te d by the B IA a

nd this C ourt. Se e Muhamme d

v . Holde r , 543 F. App’ x 652, 652–53 (9th C ir. 2013). Pe titione r ha s fa ile d to produc e qua lita

tive ly diffe re nt e vide nc e in support of the m o tion to
re ope n . Nor ha s Pe titione r M uha m m e d produc e d qua lita

tive ly diffe re nt e v ide nc e
a bout his involve

m e nt in thepolitic a l pa

rty M QM -H or the risks he would fa c e upon re turn be c a

use of tha t involve m e nt. Pe titione r’ s ge ne ra liz e d grie va nc e a bout Pakista n’ s e duc a tion sy ste m

doe s not e sta

blish a ny m ate ria l c ha

nge in c ountry
c onditions. PE T IT IO N DE NIE D. 2
#### Nathan A. ROYAL, Petitioner, v. WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., Fidelity and Casualty Co. and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38669.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 9, 1969.

J. A. Plisco, of Plisco & Zalla, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Gerald T. Nolan, Fort Lauderdale, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

*684PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 25, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Accordingly, the petition for certiorari is hereby denied.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.
DEUTSCHE BANK BROKER/DEALER AFFILIATES LIST
Name of Entity

Brokers to be included in Exhibit
Bank Inicjatyw Spoleczno-Ekonomicznych SA
BT Opera Trading S.A.
IBOXX Ltd.
K & N Kenanga Bhd
Kenanga Deutsche Futures
Kenanga Deutsche Futures Sdn Bhd
MaxBlue Investimentos Distribuidora de Titulos e Valores Mobili rios
S.A.
Minex Corporation
Morgan Grenfell & Co Limited
Morgan Grenfell Private Equity Limited
Morgan Grenfell Securities
Mortgage Ramp
MTS Japan Securities Co. Ltd.
Nissay Deutsche Asset Management Europe Limited
"Osaka Stock Exchange Co., Ltd."
OTC Deriv Limited
Paladin Australia Limited
Pro Capital Spolka Akcyjna
 PT Deutsche Securities Indonesia
"Rued, Blass & Cie AG Bankgeschaeft"
Swapswire Limited
Teleogic Limited
Tokai Deutsche Asset Management Limited
Volbroker.com Limited
Yensai.com
Yieldbroker Pty Ltd.