alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Date,"4 WEEKS BANK DISCOUNT","4 WEEKS COUPON EQUIVALENT","8 WEEKS BANK DISCOUNT","8 WEEKS COUPON EQUIVALENT","13 WEEKS BANK DISCOUNT","13 WEEKS COUPON EQUIVALENT","17 WEEKS BANK DISCOUNT","17 WEEKS COUPON EQUIVALENT","26 WEEKS BANK DISCOUNT","26 WEEKS COUPON EQUIVALENT","52 WEEKS BANK DISCOUNT","52 WEEKS COUPON EQUIVALENT"
02/23/2024,5.29,5.40,5.28,5.41,5.26,5.42,5.23,5.41,5.13,5.35,4.74,5.00
02/22/2024,5.28,5.39,5.28,5.41,5.25,5.41,5.21,5.39,5.13,5.35,4.75,5.01
02/21/2024,5.29,5.40,5.27,5.40,5.24,5.40,5.22,5.40,5.12,5.34,4.72,4.98
02/20/2024,5.29,5.40,5.26,5.39,5.24,5.40,5.22,5.40,5.12,5.34,4.71,4.97
02/16/2024,5.28,5.39,5.27,5.40,5.24,5.39,5.22,5.40,5.12,5.34,4.75,5.00
02/15/2024,5.28,5.39,5.27,5.40,5.23,5.39,5.21,5.39,5.11,5.33,4.71,4.96
02/14/2024,5.28,5.39,5.28,5.41,5.23,5.39,5.22,5.40,5.11,5.33,4.72,4.97
02/13/2024,5.27,5.38,5.29,5.42,5.25,5.41,5.23,5.41,5.12,5.34,4.76,5.01
02/12/2024,5.28,5.39,5.28,5.41,5.23,5.39,5.20,5.38,5.07,5.29,4.65,4.89
02/09/2024,5.28,5.39,5.27,5.40,5.24,5.40,5.20,5.38,5.07,5.29,4.63,4.87
02/08/2024,5.28,5.39,5.27,5.40,5.23,5.39,5.19,5.37,5.05,5.27,4.61,4.85
02/07/2024,5.26,5.37,5.27,5.40,5.23,5.39,5.17,5.35,5.04,5.26,4.61,4.85
02/06/2024,5.27,5.38,5.28,5.41,5.23,5.39,5.19,5.37,5.04,5.26,4.60,4.84
02/05/2024,5.28,5.39,5.27,5.40,5.22,5.38,5.19,5.37,5.05,5.27,4.64,4.88
02/02/2024,5.28,5.39,5.27,5.40,5.23,5.39,5.19,5.37,5.03,5.24,4.58,4.82
02/01/2024,5.28,5.39,5.28,5.41,5.22,5.38,5.15,5.33,4.97,5.18,4.46,4.69
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tasco International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Adrienne Humphreys, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of February, 2003.


/s/ Adrienne Humphreys
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
This report is being refiled to correct the date on theItem F - signature page.

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSRS/A

 

Investment Company Act file number  811-04760

 

DWS Advisor Funds

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 09/30 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 3/31/09 |
|---------------------------|---------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

----
SENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Subject: INFORMATION: NCHRP Report 350 Aesthetic Barriers and 

 Bridge Rails 

 /Original Signed by/

From: John R. Baxter, P.E. 

 Director, Office of Safety Design 

 Office of Safety 

To: Safety Field 

 Federal Lands Highway Division Engineers 

Mr. Michael S. Griffith’s April 9, 2003, memorandum (acceptance letter B-64D) identified 

several crash tested aesthetic roadside/median barriers and bridge railings that were developed in 

conjunction with Federal Lands Highway and the National Park Service. Since then, additional 

designs have been developed and successfully tested under NCHRP Report 350 guidelines or are 

similar to tested designs and considered to be equivalent. Information on the designs listed 

below was compiled by Cathy Satterfield, Safety Engineer, Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, and was submitted for formal acceptance. Each design is acceptable for use on the 

NHS and is considered to meet NCHRP Report 350 evaluation criteria at the test levels 

indicated: 

• Tubular Steel-Backed Timber (TSBT) Bridge Rail and Transition – TL-3 (Attachments 1 

and 2) 

• Steel-Backed Timber Guardrail Transition to Straight Stone Masonry Guardwall 

Parapet – TL-3 (Attachment 3) * 

• Steel-backed Timber Round Log Rail – TL-2 (Attachment 4) 

• Steel-Backed Timber Guardrail Transition to Straight Stone Masonry Guardwall 

Parapet – TL-2 (Attachment 5) 

• Steel-Backed Timber Guardrail Transition to Curved Stone Masonry Guardwall 

Parapet – TL-2 (Attachment 6) 

* Note that this transition is a modified version of the crash-tested design which was considered 

unacceptable due to occupant compartment intrusion resulting from wheel interaction with the 

timber rail /rubrail. The added curb creates a vertical transition profile that is similar to that of 

the successfully tested transition design for the Merritt Parkway aesthetic guiderail. The curb is 

expected to prevent the wheel from folding under the rail elements, reducing snagging to an 

acceptable level, and resulting in acceptable performance. 

 

Memorandum

Date: February 12, 2004 

In Rely ReferTo: HSA-10/B-64D2
2

Additional drawings and specifications for the designs listed above will be posted at 

http://efl.fhwa.dot.gov/techdev under Aesthetic Barriers. In the meantime, anyone seeking 

detailed plans and specifications for any of these features, including CADD files (Microstation 

format only), should contact Ms. Cathy Satterfield via telephone at (303) 716-2035 or via e-mail 

at Cathy.Satterfield@fhwa.dot.gov. 

6 Attachments
#### Beatrice Nellon KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 3314.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Feb. 4, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1971.

Mullins & Smith, by Cecil Gill Smith, Jr., Natchez, Miss., for appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and MILLER, JJ-

MILLER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Nellon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 244 So.2d 303, (La.App. 3 Cir. 1971), in which separate judgment has been rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed in this case is affirmed. Costs of court on appeal are taxed to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Lawyer Kelly.

Affirmed.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3570 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 500 

West Pike Street in Clarksburg, West Virginia, as the 

‘‘Irene M. Keeley United States Courthouse’’, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3570 ES

1 SECTION 1. IRENE M. KEELEY UNITED STATES COURT2 HOUSE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

4 located at 500 West Pike Street in Clarksburg, West Vir5 ginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Irene M. 

6 Keeley United States Courthouse’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the United States courthouse referred to in sub10 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Irene 

11 M. Keeley United States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the Senate February 27, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3570 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located 

Courthouse’’, and for other purposes. Virginia, as the ‘‘Irene M. Keeley United States at 500 West Pike Street in Clarksburg, West
#### In the Interest of R. A. P., a child.

No. 76-921.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 9, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and James L. Eisenberg, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

CROSS, LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM N-PX ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF DWS Floating Rate Plus Fund and DWS Core Plus Income Fund Each a Series of DWS Portfolio Trust Investment Company Act file number  811-42 DWS Portfolio Trust (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)  345 Park Avenue New York, NY  10154 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code) John Millette Secretary One Beacon Street Boston, MA  02108-3106 (Name and address of agent for service) Registrant's telephone number, including area code:617-295-1000 Date of fiscal year end:01/31 DWS Core Plus Income Fund Date of fiscal year end:05/31 DWS Floating Rate Plus Fund Date of reporting period:7/1/07-6/30/08 Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles. A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.  
  **************************** FORM N-Px REPORT *******************************  ICA File Number: 811-00042
 Reporting Period: 07/01/2007 - 06/30/2008
 DWS Portfolio Trust
       ==================== B
        DWS FLOATING RATE PLUS FUND =======================
  NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND   ==================== F
        DWS CORE PLUS INCOME FUND ========================
  NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND  ========== END NPX REPORT  SIGNATURES [See General Instruction F] Pursuant to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. (Registrant)
        DWS Portfolio Trust
  By (Signature and Title)*/s/Michael G. Clark Michael G. Clark, Chief Executive Officer
 Date8/15/08 * Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.
255 La. 473

#### CONSTRUCTION LABORERS LOCAL UNION 207 et al. v. The CITY OF LAKE CHARLES, Louisiana etc., et al. STATE PLUMBING BOARD v. CONSTRUCTION LABORERS LOCAL UNION 207 et al.

No. 50338.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 27, 1970.

In re: Construction Laborers Local Union 207 applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 228 So.2d 542; 228 So.2d 546.

Writ refused. On the issues raised and decided by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in its judgment.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
256 La. 1149

#### James W. ROLEN, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of the Minor Child, Vickie Lea Rolen v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY.

No. 50958.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 25, 1970.

TATE, Judge

(concurring in denial).

La.Civil Code Art. 231, according to its original intent, provides strict liability for the keepers of animals which injure humans, with the burden upon him to exculpate himself from the presumption of fault by showing fortuitous event or the imprudence of the victim, Delisle v. Bourriague, 105 La. 77, 29 So. 731 (1901); Planiol, Civil Law Treatise, Vol. 2, Sections 918-922 (LSLI translation, 1959) ; Surveyer, Delic-tual Responsibility, 8 Tul.L.Rev. 53, 66-68 (1933). Recent jurisprudential interpretations have varied the application of the article, as shown by the court of appeal opinion. Until this court re-examines the question, there is no error of law under the facts found.
No. 9617.

#### The Diamond Rubber Co. *v.*McClurg.

(Decided December 11, 1906.)

Error, to Circuit Court of Summit County.

*Mr. E. K. Wilcox,*for plaintiff in error:

*Mr. George■ M. Anderson*and .MV. *F. ■"V. Owen,*for defendant in error. ' •

Judgment vacated and cause remanded'to the circuit court with direction to consider .the bill of exceptions, ■' • ; 1 7

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-148288, 333-131392, 333-128316, 333-126591, 333-118821, 333-112209, 333-106873, 333-103257, 333-90458 and 333-70134) and the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-146078,333-134981, 333-126590, 333-115747, 333-108563, 333-103055, 333-101276, 333-96313, 333-91471, 333-68172, 333-68170, 333-53089, 333-53087, 333-41663, 333-39194 and 333-08978) of Nuvelo, Inc. of our reports dated March 11, 2008, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of Nuvelo, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Nuvelo, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

PaloAlto, California 

March 11, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                       7
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       43,597
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             0
<EQUITIES>                                  1,347
<MORTGAGE>                                      0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             47,894
<CASH>                                     45,443
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      3,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            167,066
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                        12,327
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             6,543
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                       85
<OTHER-SE>                                 41,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              167,066
<PREMIUMS>                                 24,689
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         4,735
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             85
<OTHER-INCOME>                             35,502
<BENEFITS>                                  8,496
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 7,630
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        2,077
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            10,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                3,272
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         7,282
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                7,282
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.85
<RESERVE-OPEN>                             19,126
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         9,384
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            (479)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          1,877
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            4,587
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                            21,567
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                         0
                                     


</TABLE>
EEOC FORM U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 

716-01 FEDERAL AGENCY ANNUAL 

PARTF EEO PROGRAM STATUS REPORT 

CERTIFICATION of ESTABLISHMENT of CONTINUING 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAMS 

I, Irene Rico, Associate Administrator for Civil Rights am the 

(Insert name above) (Insert official 

title/series/grade above) 

Principal EEO Director/Official for Federal Highway Administration 

(Insert Agency/Component Name above) 

The agency has conducted an annual self-assessment of Section 717 and Section 501 programs against the essential elements 

as prescribed by EEO MD-715. If an essential element was not fully compliant with the standards of EEO MD-715, a further 

evaluation was conducted and, as appropriate, EEO Plans for Attaining the Essential Elements of a Model EEO Program, are 

included with this Federal Agency Annual EEO Program Status Report. 

The agency has also analyzed its work force profiles and conducted barrier analyses aimed at detecting whether any 

management or personnel policy, procedure or practice is operating to disadvantage any group based on race, national origin , 

gender or disability. EEO Plans to Eliminate Identified Barriers, as appropriate, are included with this Federal Agency Annual 

EEO Program Status Report. 

I certify that proper documentation of this assessment is in place and is being maintained for EEOC review upon request. 

Date 

191 Federal Highway Administration's FY 2016 Annual EEO Program Status Report
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony CANNATELLA et al.

No. 60317.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ denied. Ruling of trial judge is correct.
Exhibit 31.2



Rule 13a  14(a) CERTIFICATION



I, Ernest J. Verrico, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                           
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Ernest J. Verrico                     
|                      |  | Ernest J. Verrico                         
|                      |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3536 

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to require notification with respect to individualized education program teams, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. BRAUN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 

to require notification with respect to individualized education program teams, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Think Differently 

5 about Education Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR IEP TEAMS. 

7 Section 614(d) of the Individuals with Disabilities 

8 Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1414(d)) is amended by adding 

9 at the end the following: 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3536 IS

1 ‘‘(8) NOTIFICATION REQUIRED.—At the begin2 ning of each school year, each local educational 

3 agency, State educational agency, or other State 

4 agency, as the case may be, shall notify each parent 

5 of a child with a disability in the agency’s jurisdic6 tion that such parent may, under paragraph 

7 (1)(B)(vi), include individuals who have knowledge 

8 or special expertise regarding the child, including re9 lated services personnel as appropriate, as part of 

10 the individualized education program team for such 

11 child.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS