alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3699 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include expenses for certain 

nonathletic supplies in the above-the-line deduction for eligible educators, 

and to allow such deduction to interscholastic sports administrators and 

coaches. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2024 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself and Ms. HASSAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

expenses for certain nonathletic supplies in the abovethe-line deduction for eligible educators, and to allow 

such deduction to interscholastic sports administrators 

and coaches. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Creating Opportunity 

5 for Athletic Coaches to Help Educate Students Act’’ or 

6 the ‘‘COACHES Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3699 IS

1 SEC. 2. UPDATES TO ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION FOR 

2 EDUCATORS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 62 of the Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(2)(D)— 

6 (A) in the header, by adding ‘‘AND OTHER

7 INSTRUCTIONAL SCHOOL PERSONNEL’’ at the 

8 end, 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘(other than nonathletic 

10 supplies for courses of instruction in health or 

11 physical education)’’, and 

12 (C) by striking ‘‘in the classroom’’ and in13 serting ‘‘as part of instructional activity’’, and 

14 (2) in subsection (d)(1), by inserting ‘‘inter15 scholastic sports administrator or coach,’’ after 

16 ‘‘counselor,’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

19 December 31, 2022. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-469-002]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

October 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 27, 1997, Natural Gas Pipeline Company 
of America (Natural) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, proposed tariff sheets to the 
effective on October 1, 1997, and others on December 1, 1997.
    Natural states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's order issued September 26, 1997, in Docket No. RP97-
469-000, which required Natural to submit tariff changes relating to 
the recovery of gas supply realignment costs.
    Natural requested any waivers which may be required to permit the 
tendered tariff sheets to become effective October 1, 1997 and December 
1, 1997, as indicated in the filing.
    On October 28, 1997, Natural filed a letter with the Commission 
requesting that the three tariff sheets proposed to be effective 
December 1, 1997, be deemed withdrawn. Natural further stated that 
Natural will refile the three sheets in a separate filing within 30 
days of the proposed effective date.
    Natural states that copies of the filing have been mailed to 
Natural's customers, interested state regulatory agencies and all 
parties set out on the official service list in Docket No. RP97-469-
000.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426 in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29327 Filed 11-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Corrpro Companies, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

(a)  The Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2003 (the Form 10-K/A) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(b)  the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K/A.

|                         |  |                                                        
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Joseph W. Rog
Joseph W. Rog
Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is being filed as part of the
Form 10-K/A or as a separate disclosure document.
# L_2005234EN.01000501.xml

| 10.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 234/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 234/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1473/2005

of 9 September 2005

determining to what extent import right applications submitted during the month of August 2005 for certain live bovine animals as part of a tariff quota provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 of 29 July 2005 laying down detailed rules for the application of a tariff quota for certain live bovine animals originating in Romania, provided for in Council Decision 2003/18/EC (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 fixes at 46 000 the number of head of live bovine animals originating in Romania which may be imported under special conditions in the period 1 August 2005 to 30 June 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 fixes at 46 000 the number of head of live bovine animals originating in Romania which may be imported under special conditions in the period 1 August 2005 to 30 June 2006.

| (2) | Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 lays down that the quantities applied for may be reduced. The applications lodged relate to total quantities which exceed the quantities available. Under these circumstances and taking care to ensure an equitable distribution of the available quantities, it is appropriate to reduce proportionally the quantities applied for, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 lays down that the quantities applied for may be reduced. The applications lodged relate to total quantities which exceed the quantities available. Under these circumstances and taking care to ensure an equitable distribution of the available quantities, it is appropriate to reduce proportionally the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

All applications for import certificates lodged pursuant to Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 shall be accepted at a rate of 10,785 % of the import rights applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 September 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p. 38.

2

---
### WILLIAM M. CURLEY, P.C. Lawyer

507 N. Church Street Palestine, Tx 75801 Tel: (903) 723-6757 Fax: (903) 727-0554

May 13, 2015

Twelfth Court of Appeals Cathy S. Lusk 1517 W. Front Street, Ste. 354 Tyler, Texas 75702

RE: Case Number: 12 -13 -00333- CR

Trial Court Case Number: 12CR-115

Style: Wilbert Walker v. The State of Texas; in the Twelfth Court of Appeals

Dear Ms. Lusk:

I certify that I have complied with T.R.A.P. 48.4 in this cause. Attached please

find a copy of the return receipt as required by the rule. I have also attached a copy of the

USPS tracking as of May 12, 2015.

Sincerely,

William M. Curley

Enclosure ACCEPTED 12-13-00333-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 5/13/2015 12:04:05 PM

CATHY LUSK CLERK
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00500

- CR

B OBBY L

YNN R ACHAL

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarr ant County (1567358R)

November 14, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was e rror in the trial court’s judgment. We affirm the trial court ’ s judgment to Count

One

. We modif

y Count Two and Count Three t o de lete the dea dly

- we apon findings

and affirm the trial court ’ s judg ment s to the se counts as modified. We vacate the tr ial

cou r t ’ s judgment to Count Four

. It is ordered that the tria l court ’ s judgment s a re

affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Election Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a 
closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Wednesday, December 10, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Eliot Cohen, AGED Secretariat, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced 
Research Projects Agency and the Military Department in planning and 
managing an effective and economical research and development program 
in the area of electron devices.
    The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and 
development programs which the Military Departments propose to initiate 
with industry, universities or in their laboratories. The agenda for 
this meeting will include programs on Radiation Hardened Devices, 
Microwave Tubes, Displays and Lasers. The review will include details 
of classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. section 10(d) (1994)), it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) 
(1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the 
public.

    Dated: October 30, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-29183 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-622.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

BOUNDARIES 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MEXICO Extending the 

Treaty of June 9, 2000 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Mexico June 22, 2010 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MEXICO 

Boundaries 

 Agreement extending the treaty of 

 June 9, 2000. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at 

 Mexico June 22, 2010; 

 Entered into force June 22, 2010.
May 28, 2015

Mr. David Holden

222 East Adams Street OFallen, IL 62269

Dear Mr. David Holden:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 22, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1110), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
No. 9633.

#### Great China Tea Co., a Partnership, *v.*The Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

(Decided December 18, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton County.

*Messrs. Moulinier, Bettman & Hunt,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Thomas Hollister; Mr. Walter A. DeCamp; Mr. Burton P. Hollister; Mr. Ralph E. Clark; Mr. Joseph I. Doran*and *Messrs Hollister & Hollister,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
**CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 
 
 I, Kevin
D. Johnson, certify that;
 
 (1) I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Snap2 Corporation;
 
 (2) Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 (3) Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4) The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and
 
 (5) The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting,
to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small
business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.
 
 Date:  May 18,
2005
 
 
 /s/   
 Kevin D.
Johnson
 By:   
Kevin D. Johnson
 Title:
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28680]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (97-158)]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that Corken, Inc., a subsidiary of 
IDEX Corporation, having its principal place of business at 3805 N.W. 
36th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, has applied for a partially 
exclusive license to practice the invention described and claimed in 
U.S. Patent No. 5,171,822, entitled ``LOW TOXICITY HIGH TEMPERATURE PMR 
POLYIMIDE,'' which is assigned to the United States of America as 
represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant of a 
license should be sent to Langley Research Center.

DATE: Responses to this notice must be received by December 29, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. George F. Helfrich, Patent 
Counsel, Langley Research Center, Mail Stop 212, Hampton, VA 23681-
0002, telephone (757) 864-9260; fax (757) 864-9190.

    Dated: October 23, 1997.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-28680 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Shipperpartner FLEET tool [electronic resource].**
 
Part 1|Part 2|Part 3|
 
SuDoc Number:EP 6.52:SH 6/

Item Number:0484-E (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000869983
 
July 12, 2018
# ~.t;Q of Environmental Quality 

## b

May 21,2015 

### CERTIFIED MAIL: 7012 2210 0002 5960 8098
Gordon Criswell Director, Environmental & Engineering Compliance PPLMontana, LLC JE Corette Plant 303 N. Broadway, Suite 400 Billings, MT 59101 

### Re: Revocation Order for Montana Air Quality Permit MAQP #2953-00 and Title V Operating Permit #OP2953-08 Dear Mr. Criswell: The DepartmentofEnvironmental Quality

- Air Resources Management Bureau (Department) received your request to revoke Montana Air Quality Permit (MAQP) #2953-00 and Title V OperatingPermit #OP2953-08 on May 13, 2015. Action. The Departmentis revoking MAQP #2953-00 and Title V OperatingPermit #OP2953-08 according to the attached request. In accordance with ARM 17.8.763 and the waiver in the request ofyour right to a contested case, the Department's revocation ofyour permitis final immediately. Operation ofa Facility once a Permitis Revoked. Once a permitis revoked, a permit application mustbe submitted and a new permitissued prior to any future operation ofthe equipment or facility. Ifyou have any guestions, please contact me at (406) 444-0286.



### Air Resources ManagementBureau 406-444-0286 dklemp@mt.gov

Steve Bullock, Governor I Tom Livers, Director I P.O. Box 200901 I Helena, MT 59620-0901 I (406) 444-2544 I www.deq.mt.gov
Exhibit 23
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  1.
    
    Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-155372, 333-155371, 333-128528, 333-106307
and 333-109433) of OXiGENE, Inc.,
 2.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-05787) pertaining to the Amended and Restated
Stock Incentive Plan of OXiGENE, Inc.,
 3.
    
    Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-92747, 333-32958 and 333-117083) pertaining
to the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan ofOXiGENE, Inc.,
 4.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-84870) pertaining to the Compensation Award
Stock Agreements Between Registrant and Certain Directors of OXiGENE, Inc.,
 5.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-85860) pertaining to the Compensation Award
Stock Agreement Between Registrant and a certain Director of OXiGENE, Inc.,
 6.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-84872) pertaining to the Restricted Stock
Agreements Between Registrant and Certain Employees and Non-Employees of OXiGENE, Inc. and,
 7.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-126636) pertaining to the 2005
Stock Plan of OXiGENE, Inc.;
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLPBoston, MassachusettsMarch 26, 2009