alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 

11.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 11-1 

11.2 GENERAL APPROACH.................................................................................................. 11-1 

11-i 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0016 COMMENT 25
 

CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS 

11.1 INTRODUCTION 

The life-cycle cost (LCC) subgroup analysis evaluates impacts of standards on 

identifiable groups, such as different consumer populations or business types that may be 

disproportionately affected by any national energy conservation standard level. In the notice of 

proposed rulemaking, the U.S Department of Energy (DOE) will analyze the LCCs and payback 

periods (PBPs) for consumers that fall into such groups. The analysis will determine whether any 

particular group of consumers would be adversely affected by any of the trial standard levels 

(TSLs). 

Using the LCC spreadsheet model, DOE plans to examine variations in energy prices and 

energy use that might affect the net present value of a standard for consumer sub-populations. As 

described in chapter 8 of the preliminary technical support document, the preliminary LCC 

analysis includes various consumer types who use fluorescent lamp-and-ballast systems. This 

analysis includes consumers purchasing systems in different sectors, purchasing systems for 

different building types, replacing different baseline systems, and undergoing different 

purchasing events. 

11.2 GENERAL APPROACH 

For fluorescent lamp-and-ballast systems, DOE estimates LCC savings and PBPs for 

consumers in the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. Fluorescent lamps will not be 

regulated under the proposed ballast rulemaking but are considered in the energy use analysis 

(chapter 6) to determine energy consumption of ballasts. DOE also analyzes the LCC impacts on 

consumers living in or operating different buildings in the residential, commercial, and industrial 

sectors. For example, DOE analyzes the impact of standards for people running educational 

facilities and for those who live in a mobile home. DOE also analyzes impacts on consumers in 

different regions of the country. 

In addition, DOE evaluates the LCC impacts on consumers who purchase different 

baseline lamp-and-ballast systems. For example, the economic impacts of a standard will be 

different for a consumer who owns a typical 4-foot T8 versus a 4-foot T12 lamp-and-ballast 

system. 

DOE also analyzes the LCC impact of a standard on consumers faced with a variety of 

different lamp-and-ballast purchasing events. The LCC impacts on a consumer who must replace 

a ballast in an existing system versus the purchase of a lamp-and-ballast system for new building 

construction are different. 

In the LCC subgroup analysis, DOE will examine a variety of consumer sub-populations. 

This analysis will determine whether any particular group of consumers would be adversely 

affected by any of the TSLs. 

11-1 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0016 COMMENT 25
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
DTVN Holdings, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-41492 and 333-53348) of DTVN Holdings, Inc. (formerly Zydeco
Energy, Inc.) of our report dated February 15, 2002, except for note 16, which
is as of March 21, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of DTVN
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive loss and cash flows for the years then ended included in this Form
10-KSB.

Our report dated February 15, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a net working
capital deficit and their resulting dependence upon access to additional
external financing which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

                                     KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas
April 4, 2002
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO SUPPLY AGREEMENT 

This SECOND AMENDMENT TO SUPPLY AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into on December 22, 2017, (the “Amendment
Effective Date”) by and between T2 Biosystems, Inc. (“Buyer”), and SMC Ltd. (“Seller”). 

WHEREAS, this Amendment is intended to modify the Supply Agreement, dated October 10, 2014, by and between the Buyer and
Seller, and as amended in the first Amendment to the Supply Agreement, dated August 29, 2017 (together the “Agreement”). 

WHEREAS, the parties agree to extend the Initial Term of the Agreement and amend certain exhibits to the Agreement, as more
specifically set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises made herein, and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Agreement in accordance with Section XXV of the Agreement as follows: 

1.    Amendment to Section XVI. Term of the Agreement. Section XVI of the Agreement is hereby amended by
deleting the first sentence of the section in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 
 “The Agreement commences as of the
Effective Date and, and shall remain in effect until March 31, 2018 (the “Initial Term”).” 

2.    No Other Amendments. No other changes or modifications to the Agreement are incorporated in this
Amendment, and all other provisions and terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect upon execution of this Amendment by Buyer’s and Seller’s authorized representatives. 

[Signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the day and year
hereinafter written. 
  

									
	BUYER:	 		 		 	
				
	By:	 	 /s/ John McDonough
	 		 	12/20/2017
		 	Name:	 	John McDonough	 		 	Date
		 	Title:	 	President & CEO	 		 	
			
	SELLER:	 		 	
				
	By:	 	 /s/ Tom Howe
	 		 	12/22/2017
		 	Name:	 	Tom Howe	 		 	Date
		 	Title:	 	CAO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       6,906,650
<SECURITIES>                                   845,852
<RECEIVABLES>                                  349,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,232,216
<PP&E>                                       2,397,281
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,026,046)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,911,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,572,195
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,375
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,332,032
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,911,602
<SALES>                                      1,422,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,470,046
<CGS>                                           22,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,667,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,858,132)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,858,132)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,858,132)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 12, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly
131463(61)(62) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

DETROIT FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION, I.A.F.F. LOCAL 344, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 131463

v COA: 266654

CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellant. Wayne CC: 05-526691-CL

___________________ ___________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by pl aintiff-appellee for immediate consideration is GRANTED. Th e motion for adjournment of the oral argument of this case is considered and it is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to place this case on the April 2007 Session Ca lendar for argument and submission.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 12, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 12.1


                           United States Leather, Inc.
               Computation of Ratios of Earning to Fixed Charges &
     Computation of Deficiency of Earnings Available to Cover Fixed Charges




                                   1997      1996    1995     1994     1993

    Earnings:

       (Loss) Earnings Before
        Taxes                   (140,631) (31,221)    8,539    8,833   6,917
       Interest Expense           19,119   17,159    18,062   17,283  23,111

       One-fourth of Operating
        Lease Rental Expense         141      126       146      222     205
                                 -------   ------    ------   ------  ------
                                (121,371) (13,936)   26,747   26,338  30,028
                                 =======   ======    ======   ======  ======

    Fixed Charges:
       Interest Expense           19,119   17,159    18,062   17,283  23,111

       One-fourth of Operating
        Lease Rental Expense         141      126       146      222     205
                                  ------   ------    ------   ------  ------
                                  19,260   17,285    18,208   17,505  23,111
                                  ======   ======    ======   ======  ======

    Deficiency of Earnings
     Available to Cover Fixed
     Charges (1)                (140,631) (31,221)       --       --      --
                                 =======   ======

    Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
     Charges (1)                    --        --       1.47     1.50    1.30
                                                       ====     ====    ====



   (1)  For purposes of these computations, earnings consist of consolidated
        income (loss) before taxes plus fixed charges (excluding capitalized
        interest).  Fixed charges consist of interest on indebtedness
        (including amortization of deferred loan costs) plus the portion of
        operating lease rental expense (deemed to be 25%) representative of
        the interest factor.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3633 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3633

To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to allow the District 
 of Columbia to receive Federal funding under such Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2024

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to allow the District 
 of Columbia to receive Federal funding under such Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flood Prevention Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOR FEDERAL FUNDING UNDER 
              THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972.

    Section 304(4) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 
U.S.C. 1453(4)) is amended by inserting ``the District of Columbia,'' 
after ``the term also includes''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.01





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14





I, David N. Pierce, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A of FX Energy, Inc.





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Dated: March 9, 2011








/s/ David N. Pierce





David N. Pierce


Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      87,268,922
<SECURITIES>                                30,618,650
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,201,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,131,610
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           130,947,891
<PP&E>                                      11,148,256
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,162,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             178,527,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,836,942
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       235,764
<OTHER-SE>                                 162,798,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               178,527,874
<SALES>                                     11,004,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,004,241
<CGS>                                          719,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  719,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            29,204,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               644,534
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (17,572,680)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (17,572,680)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (17,572,680)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.80)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-375-000]


Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

October 31, 1997.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference in this 
proceeding will be convened on November 13, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. The 
settlement conference will be held at the offices of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
for the purpose of exploring the possible settlement of the above 
referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, contact Arnold Meltz at (202) 208-2161 
or John Roddy at (202) 208-0053.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29328 Filed 11-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.36


                  (COLUMBIANA COUNTY PORT AUTHORITY LETTERHEAD)

                                FEBRUARY 26, 2003

Martin R. MacDonald, Sr. Vice President
Probex Corporation
15510 Wright Bros. Dr.
Addison, TX  75001

Dear Martin:

         The Columbiana County Port Authority will authorize an extension of the
lease purchase agreement until May 31, 2003 with payments due deferred until the
option is exercised. However, the option renewal payment will not be credited
toward the acquisition. All accumulated payments will be due upon execution of
the option agreement.

         If you are in agreement with the above terms and conditions, please
sign below and return to our office.


                                                Yours truly,


                                                Tracy V. Drake
                                                Executive Director



--------------------------------------------------
Martin MacDonald               Date
Sr. Vice President


TVD/sls
Exhibit 23.02

 

**CONSENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING CONSULTANT**

 

 

I consent to the use of my report respecting the estimated oil reserve information as of December 31, 2008, for the Montana and Nevada producing properties of FX Energy, Inc. (the “Company”), and the discussion of such report as contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and to the incorporation by reference of            such report, as it is referred to in the Company’s annual report, into the following registration statements:

 

| Form   | SEC File No. | Effective Date     |
|--------|--------------|--------------------|
|   |         |               |
| S-3    | 333-80489    | June 30, 1999      |
| S-3    | 333-110345   | November 18, 2003  |
| S-3    | 333-155718   | November 26, 2008* |
| S-8    | 333-112717   | February 11, 2004  |
| S-8    | 333-128299   | September 14, 2005 |

_______________

*  This registration statement is not yet effective. This is the original filing date. 

 

/s/ Larry D. Krause

 

Larry D. Krause

Billings, Montana

March 13, 2009
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________
No. 97-20324 Summary Calendar

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICKY LAYNE WAGGONER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-CR-96-212-1)

April 21, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ricky Layne Waggoner appeals his conviction for embezzlement.

In challenging the s ufficiency of the evidence, Waggoner argues

that there was insufficient evidence to corroborate his admissions

of guilt, offered through the testimony of three witnesses. He

also argues that the district court erred in denying his motion for

mistrial after the jury deadlocked.-2-

We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appe llate

record. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to prove

Waggoner’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v.

Garth, 773 F.2d 1469, 1479 (5th Cir. 1985). We also conclude that

the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the

motion for mistrial. See United States v. Garcia, 732 F.2d 1221,

1227-28 (5th Cir. 1984).

AFFIRMED.
#### Rafael Lopez FERRER, Petitioner, v. Louis SANCHEZ and Gloria Sanchez, his wife, Respondents.

No. 41283.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 30, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 247 So.2d 512.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 59605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-250; RM-8952]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Parris Island and Hampton, SC

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Simmons Broadcasting 
Company, substitutes Channel 276C3 for Channel 221A at Parris Island, 
South Carolina, and modifies Station WGZO(FM)'s license accordingly. To 
accommodate the upgrade, we also substitute Channel 221A for Channel 
276A at Hampton, South Carolina, and modify Station WBHC-FM's license 
accordingly. See 61 FR 66248, December 17, 1996. Channel 276C3 can be 
allotted to Parris Island in compliance with the Commission's minimum 
distance separation requirements without the imposition of a site 
restriction at petitioner's requested site. The coordinates for Channel 
276C3 at Parris Island are North Latitude 32-27-00 and West Longitude 
80-47-30. Additionally, Channel 221A can be allotted to Hampton in 
compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation 
requirements at Station WBHC-FM's presently licensed site. The 
coordinates for Channel 221A at Hampton are North Latitude 32-50-39 and 
West Longitude 81-07-28. With this action, this proceeding is 
terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 8, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 96-250, adopted October 15, 1997, and 
released October 24, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under South 
Carolina, is amended by removing Channel 221A and adding Channel 276C3 
at Parris Island; and by removing Channel 276A and adding Channel 221A 
at Hampton.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-29116 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P