alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3376 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of steel 

and aluminum products retroactively approved for exclusion from certain 

duties during the COVID–19 pandemic. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2023 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VANCE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain 

entries of steel and aluminum products retroactively approved for exclusion from certain duties during the 

COVID–19 pandemic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN STEEL AND ALU4 MINUM PRODUCTS RETROACTIVELY ELIGI5 BLE FOR EXCLUSION FROM ADDITIONAL DU6 TIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of 

8 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other proVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:06 Dec 04, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3376.IS S3376

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3376 IS

1 vision of law, U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall 

2 liquidate or reliquidate each entry of a covered product 

3 on which duties under section 232 of the Trade Expansion 

4 Act of 1962 (19 U.S.C. 1862) were paid before the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act without an assessment of 

6 such duties. 

7 (b) REQUESTS.—A liquidation or reliquidation may 

8 be made under subsection (a) with respect to an entry of 

9 an article only if a request therefor is filed with U.S. Cus10 toms and Border Protection, not later than 180 days after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act, that contains suffi12 cient information to enable U.S. Customs and Border Pro13 tection— 

14 (1) to identify and reconstruct the entry, if nec15 essary; and 

16 (2) to verify that the article is a covered prod17 uct. 

18 (c) REFUNDS.—Any refunds owed by the United 

19 States pursuant to the liquidation or reliquidation of an 

20 entry under this section shall be paid, without interest, 

21 not later than 90 days after the date of the liquidation 

22 or reliquidation (as the case may be). 

23 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

24 (1) COVERED PRODUCT.—The term ‘‘covered 

25 product’’ means a product that— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3376 IS

1 (A) is eligible for exclusion from additional 

2 duties imposed by the President under section 

3 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (19 

4 U.S.C. 1862) on imports of— 

5 (i) steel articles classifiable under 

6 heading 9903.80.01 of the Harmonized 

7 Tariff Schedule of the United States; or 

8 (ii) aluminum articles classifiable 

9 under heading 9903.85.01 of such Sched10 ule; and 

11 (B) was granted such exclusion through an 

12 approval for retroactive application issued by 

13 the Department of Commerce during 2020 or 

14 2021. 

15 (2) ENTER; ENTRY.—The terms ‘‘enter’’ and 

16 ‘‘entry’’ include a withdrawal from warehouse for 

17 consumption. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

NH-05

Great Bay Access 

Improvements (Arboretum 

Dr.)

Roadway Reconstruction

U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service - Great Bay 

National Wildlife Refuge

City of 

Portsmouth Rockingham 2016

NH-06 Ellsworth- Stinson Lake Road Roadway Reconstruction U.S. Forest Service - White 

Mountain National Forest NHDOT Grafton 2016

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the New Hampshire Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the New Hampshire FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

New Hampshire Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2018

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The New Hampshire PDC does not have a firm date for 

the next Call for Projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. 

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
# L_2005027EN.01003601.xml

| 29.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 27/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 27/36

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 155/2005

of 28 January 2005

concerning tenders submitted under tendering procedure for the refund on consignment of husked long grain B rice to the island of Réunion referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2033/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2692/89 of 6 September 1989 laying down detailed rules for exports of rice to Réunion (2), and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 2033/2004 (3) opens an invitation to tender for the subsidy on rice exported to Réunion. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2033/2004 (3) opens an invitation to tender for the subsidy on rice exported to Réunion.

| (2) | Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 2692/89 allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 2b(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 2692/89 allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 2b(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 2 and 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2692/89, a maximum subsidy should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 2 and 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2692/89, a maximum subsidy should not be fixed.

| (4) | The Management Committee for Cereals has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Management Committee for Cereals has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders submitted from 24 to 27 January 2005 in response to the invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2033/2004 for the subsidy on exports to Réunion of husked long grain B rice falling within CN code 1006 20 98.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 261, 7.9.1989, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1275/2004 (OJ L 241, 13.7.2004, p. 8).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 353, 27.11.2004, p. 9.

3

---
Gulfstream 


A GENERAL DVNAMICS COMPANY 

1 November 2010 

A&C-10-440 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Subject: 	 Petition for Exemption from 14 CFR 25.981 (a)(3) for Structural Aspects of 

Fuel Tank Ignition Protection 

FAA Project No.: TC8700AT-T 


EASA Project No.: P-EASA.IM.A.169 


Attachment: 	 1) Petition for Partial Exemption for 14 CFR 25.981 (a)(3) for Structural 

Aspect of Fuel Tank Lightning Protection 

2) Gulfstream Document GVI-GER-0127 Revision A, "Structural 

Assessment for Fuel Systems Lightning Protection Certification for FAA 

14CFR 25.981." 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation (Gulfstream) is respectfully submitting the enclosed petition 

for partial exemption to 14 CFR 25.981(a)(3), Fuel Tank Ignition Prevention. This request is 

accompanied by the document noted in attachment 2, which provides supporting evidence that 

Gulfstream has taken all reasonable measures to comply with this regulation to the extent that it 

is practicable, and to provide analytical justification for those areas in which full compliance 

cannot be achieved. 

Please note Gulfstream believes that because this request is not setting any new precedents, 


and is similar to exemptions granted previously, our petition includes a request for a reduced 


review and comment period. 


If there are any questions, or if I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact 


me at (912) 965-5270, or Keith Candline at (912) 965-4817. 


Sincerely, 

- - - - - -------- -.--- ­ P. o. Box 2206 • Savannah, GA 31402·2206 USA· Telephone (912) 965-3000 • gulfstream . com
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Sunrise Telecom Incorporated: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (File Nos. 333-125128,333-61596, 333-43270, 333-96689, 333-107471 and 333-115722) on Form S-8 of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated of our report dated May 1, 2009 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, whichreport appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated. 

 

Our report dated May 1, 2009 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Theconsolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Mountain View, California 

May 1, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         105,110
<SECURITIES>                                 1,345,762
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,516
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,305,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,837,871
<PP&E>                                       3,886,569
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,975,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,295,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          836,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        89,353
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,265,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,295,776
<SALES>                                        134,131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,131
<CGS>                                        2,045,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,045,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,968,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              83,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,785,276)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,785,276)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09097

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 09097\09097_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09097\09097_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

09097\09097_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09097\09097_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09097\09097_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09097\09097_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09097\09097_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09097\09097_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09097\09097_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09097\Certification Statement Plant ID 09097.pdf Plant certification statement

09097\PlantID_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 09097\Supplemental Documents\Linden Site Drawings\09097_006 Schematic of Flow.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09097\Supplemental Documents\Linden Site Drawings\linden2007_siteplan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
U.S. Department 

Of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration

400 Seventh St., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

March 14, 1991 

Refer to: HNG-14/SS-23 

Mr. John G. Bestgen, Jr. 

Regional Federal Highway Administrator (HEO-01) 

Albany, New York 

This is in response to your February 19 office memorandum to Mr. Thomas O. Willett, 

which transmitted a crash test report on the subject breakaway device. This office was 

requested to determine the acceptability of the device for use on Federal-aid highway 

projects. 

The report dated January 1985 was prepared by the New Jersey Department of 

Transportation. Testing in accordance with the 1985 AASHTO Standard Specifications

for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires and Traffic Signals (“Support 

Specs”) was done by the Southwest Research Institute. The enclosed “Figure 1” shows a 

drawing of the test article from the New Jersey report. The test vehicles were 1977 or 

1978 Honda Civics. The test results are summarized here: 

Test Number NJ-1 NJ-2 NJ-3

Vehicle Weight (pounds) 1771 1812 1743

Impact Speed (m.p.h.) 20.8 59.9 61.4 

Impact Angle (degree) 0 0 25 

Offset to Vehicle 

 Centerline (inches) 0 15 22 

Change in Velocity (f.p.s.) 

 Film 7.8 7.9 10.0 

 Accelerometer 7.2 8.8 10.7 

 Occupant 7.8 9.9 11.4 

These results meet the change in velocity requirements of the AASHTO Support 

Specifications. Stub-height measurements were not available in this report, but it is 

evident that, as long as the base is installed low to the ground, it should be easy to meet 

the 4-inch stub-height requirement. 

Thus, the New Jersey Breakaway Couplings are acceptable for use on Federal-aid 

highway projects within the range of conditions tested, if proposed by a State. This 

acceptance is limited to breakaway characteristics of the couplings and dos not cover 
their structural features. Presumably, New Jersey has investigated the structural design 

limitations and has detailed installation requirements to ensure proper performance. The 

State should have assurance from the fabricator that production couplings have 

essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as those used in the 

tests. The State should also be prepared to certify that supports with those bases will 

meet the FHWA breakaway requirements. 

 L.A. Staron, Chief 

 Federal-Aid and Design Division 

Geometric and Roadside Design Acceptance Letter SS-23
**Exhibit 10.18**

 

**DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS**

**BETWEEN REGISTRANT AND DIRECTORS**

 

Each director (other than the Chairman of the Board) who is not a Company employee is paid an annual retainer fee of $30,000. Each non-employee directoris also paid $2,000 for each Board meeting attended in person, $1,000 for each Board meeting attended by telephone and $1,000 for each Board committee meeting attended in person or by telephone. The director who chairs the Audit Committee of theBoard is paid an additional annual retainer fee of $15,000. The directors who chair the Compensation and the Nominating and Governance Committees of the Board are each paid an additional annual retainer fee of $5,000. 

 

Mr. Lauer, Chairman of the Board, stepped down as Chief Executive Officer onDecember 31, 2003. He will continue to be an employee of the Company until his planned retirement as an employee on June 30, 2004. Until that date, he will receive a base salary at an annual rate of $200,000, will be eligible to continue toparticipate in benefit plans that are available generally to other employees, will be eligible to continue to participate in the Varian, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, will continue to be provided with a Company-leased automobile, and will bereimbursed for financial planning and tax services, all to the same extent while he served as Chief Executive Officer. Effective July 1, 2004, following Mr. Lauer’s retirement as an employee, Mr. Lauer will be paid an annual retainer fee of$120,000 (in lieu of any other annual retainer, committee chair or attendance fees) as the non-employee Chairman of the Board, will no longer receive the benefits and perquisites that he received as an officer of the Company, and will no longerparticipate in benefit plans available only to employees of the Company. 

 

Directors may elect to receive, in lieu of all or a portion of the foregoing fees, shares of the Company’s common stock based on the fair market value of the stock on the date the fees would have been paid. Inaddition, under the Company’s Omnibus Stock Plan, each director who is not a Company employee receives upon initial appointment or election to the Board a nonqualified stock option to acquire 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock,and receives annually thereafter a nonqualified stock option to acquire 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Pursuant to this provision of the Omnibus Stock Plan, Mr. Lauer will receive a nonqualified stock option to acquire 10,000shares of common stock on July 1, 2004, the date he becomes a non-employee director; he will receive annually thereafter a nonqualified stock option to acquire 5,000 shares of common stock. All such stock options are granted with an exercise priceequal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, are vested and exercisable beginning on the grant date and have a ten-year term. 

 

Each director is reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that such director and his or her spouse incursattending Board meetings and functions.
No. 9767.

#### Hageman *v.*The State of Ohio.

(Decided October *2,*1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Erie County.

*567
      *Mr. John Ray,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Roy H. Williams,*prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Nuvelo, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-148288, 333-131392, 333-128316, 333-126591, 333-118821, 333-112209, 333-106873, 333-103257, 333-90458, and 333-70134) and the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-146078, 333-134981, 333-126590,333-115747, 333-108563, 333-103055, 333-101276, 333-96313, 333-91471, 333-68172, 333-68170, 333-53089, 333-53087, 333-41663, 333-39194, and 333-08978) of Nuvelo, Inc. and subsidiary of our report dated March 15, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Nuvelo, Inc. and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Nuvelo,Inc. 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

SanFrancisco, California 

March 10, 2008
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00319**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  00319\00319_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 00319\00319_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00319\00319_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00319\00319_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00319\Certification Statement_00319.pdf Plant certification statement x 00319\00319_Checklist_102510_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00319\00319_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### Roberto FERNANDEZ, a minor, by Aracelia Fernandez, his mother and next friend, Appellant, v. GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee.

Nos. 68-1120, 68-1121.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 8, 1969.

*725Talburt & Kubicki, Miami, for appellant.

Truett & Watkins and Harold Heller, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

These appeals have been consolidated for appellate purposes. The appellant, Roberto Fernandez, a sixteen year old minor, was operating a vehicle owned by an insured of the appellee, and was injured. The contract of insurance issued to the insured contained coverage providing for injuries caused by uninsured motorists. Thereafter, pursuant to the terms of the insurance contract, the minor instituted arbitration proceedings with the American Arbitration Association in order to determine whether the appellee was liable for his damages. The American Arbitration Association determined that no liability existed, and the minor, by and through his mother and next friend, appellant Ara-celia Fernandez, instituted these proceedings in the circuit court. Ultimately, the complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint, which was not done, and final judgment was entered in favor of the appellee.

Although several cogent theories of law have been offered by the appellee in order to sustain the ruling of the trial court, we hereby affirm on the authority of Section 627.-01051 (2) Fla.Stat. F.S.A. Having instituted the arbitration proceedings, the plaintiff below cannot disclaim the findings of the arbitration board by now asserting the defense of infancy.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-04760 |
|------------------------------------|-----------|

 

DWS Advisor Funds

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 12/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 12/31/08 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

----