alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005329EN.01002801.xml

| 16.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 329/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 329/28

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2057/2005

of 15 December 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005 of 2 September 2005 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden for the 2005/2006 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 9 to 15 December 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 December 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 228, 3.9.2005, p. 5.

3

---
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3688 

To increase the rates of pay under the statutory pay systems and for 

prevailing rate employees by 7.4 percent, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2024 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Ms. WARREN, Mr. KAINE, Mr. 

HEINRICH, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. PADILLA, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. WARNER, Mr. BROWN, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 

FETTERMAN, Mr. CARDIN, and Ms. HIRONO) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To increase the rates of pay under the statutory pay systems 

and for prevailing rate employees by 7.4 percent, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Adjustment 

5 of Income Rates Act’’ or the ‘‘FAIR Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT TO RATES OF PAY. 

7 (a) STATUTORY PAY SYSTEMS.—For calendar year 

8 2025, the percentage adjustment under section 5303 of 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3688 IS

1 title 5, United States Code, in the rates of basic pay under 

2 the statutory pay systems (as defined in section 5302 of 

3 title 5, United States Code) shall be 4 percent. 

4 (b) PREVAILING RATE EMPLOYEES.—Notwith5 standing the wage survey requirements under section 

6 5343(b) of title 5, United States Code, for fiscal year 

7 2025, the rates of basic pay (as in effect on the last day 

8 of fiscal year 2024 under section 5343(a) of such title) 

9 for prevailing rate employees in each wage area and the 

10 rates of basic pay under sections 5348 and 5349 of such 

11 title shall be increased by 4 percent. 

12 SEC. 3. ADJUSTMENT TO LOCALITY PAY. 

13 For calendar year 2025, the percentage adjustment 

14 under section 5304 of title 5, United States Code, shall 

15 be an increase of 3.4 percent. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
also Bamber, Amy t o : Jordan Page 02/04/2010 02:04 PM

You should probably contact Peter Rice, with the University of Montana. He is conducting aquatic herbicide trials in a reservoir in NW Montana for control of milfoil. His work is specific to supporting the EA for control of the weed. T his would be good, very specific information for you to look at. Amy Bamber Montana Department of Agriculture 303 N. Roberts Helena, MT 59620-0201 406-444-3676 abamber @ mt.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         990,754
<SECURITIES>                                   608,678
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,904,194
<PP&E>                                         4,703,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,035,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          80,213
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,806,763
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,148,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,035,147
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               25,369
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  314,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (288,817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (288,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (288,817)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David Cho, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Restaurant Concepts of America Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Restaurant Concepts of America Inc.





Date:  December 14, 2010





By: /s/ David ChoDavid Cho,Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)and Principal Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project Nos. 2004-073 and 11607-000]


Holyoke Water Power Company, Ashburnham Municipal Light Plant and 
Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company; Notice of Project 
Site Visit for the Holyoke Hydroelectric Project on the Connecticut 
River

November 3, 1997.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is reviewing 
the Holyoke Water Power Company's application for a new license for the 
continued operation of the Holyoke Project on the Connecticut River, 
Massachusetts. The Commission is similarly reviewing a competing 
application for the Holyoke Project by Ashburnham Municipal Light Plant 
and the Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company.
    The Commission anticipates conducting public and agency scoping 
meetings for the Holyoke Project during the upcoming winter months. 
Given the uncertainty in weather conditions during the winter in 
Massachusetts, the applicant and Commission staff will conduct a site 
visit of the Holyoke Project prior to conducting any scoping meetings. 
The site visit will be held on November 18, 1997, beginning at 9:00 
a.m. All interested individuals, organizations, and agencies are 
invited to attend. All participants are responsible for their own 
transportation to the site. For more details, interested parties should 
contact Mr. Jim Kearns of Northeast Utilities Service Company at (860) 
665-5936 prior to the site visit date.
    For further information, please contact Allan Creamer, at (202/219-
0365) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Hydropower 
Licensing, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29483 Filed 11-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29058]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 3090-0007]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request Entitled Contractor's 
Qualifications and Financial Information

AGENCY: Office of Chief Financial Officer (B), GSA.

ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding reinstatement 
to a previously approved OMB clearance (3090-0007).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Office of Acquisition Policy has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and 
approve a reinstatement of a previously approved information collection 
requirement concerning Contractor's Qualifications and Financial 
Information. A request for public comments was published at 62 FR 43332 
on August 13, 1997. No comments were received.

DATES: Comment Due Date: December 4, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect 
of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing 
this burden, should be submitted to: Edward Springer, GSA Desk Officer, 
Room 3235, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and to Marjorie Ashby, General 
Services Administration (MVP), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald Smeltzer, (202) 501-1676.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: .

A. Purpose

    The GSA is requesting the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to 
reinstate information collection, 3090-0007, Contractor's 
Qualifications and Financial Information. This form is used to 
determine the financial capability of prospective contractors as to 
whether they meet the financial responsibility standards in accordance 
with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the General Services 
Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR).

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 5,822; annual responses: 6,986; average hours per 
response: 2.5; burden hours: 17,465.

Copy of Proposal

    A copy of this proposal may be obtained from the GSA Acquisition 
Policy Division (MVP), Room 4011, GSA Building, 1800 F Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20405, or by telephoning (202) 501-3822, or by faxing 
your request to (202) 501-3341.

    Dated: October 28, 1997.
Ida M. Ustad,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 97-29058 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-M
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lester SCOTT.

No. 61710.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 1978.

*559Randy D. Elkins, Marshall R. Pearce, Minden, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Henry N. Brown, Jr., Dist. Atty., James M. Johnson, First Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Lester Scott, was convicted of first degree murder, LSA-R.S. 14:30, and sentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.

There are five assignments of error, four of which depend upon whether there was appreciable evidence of an overt act on the part of the victim before the defendant attacked him. See *State v. Lee,*La., 331 So.2d 455 (1976). The trial judge found no such evidence. We agree with his ruling.

The remaining assignment of error is considered abandoned as it was neither briefed nor argued. *State v. Phillips,*La., 337 So.2d 1157 (1976). The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

SUMMERS, J., concurs.
#### Edward SHERMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-428.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 3, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### James B. McDONOUGH, Jr., as the Administrator C.T.A.D.B.N. of the Estate of C. A. Rudisill, deceased, Appellant, v. Clara B. HALL et al., Appellees.

Nos. 69-658, 69-659.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 16, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 1970.

James B. McDonough, Jr. and John A. Curtiss, of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellant.

Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P. A., Tampa, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This court previously ruled in this case that appellant’s counterclaim against appel-lee-Hall individually, must be dismissed.1 Pursuant to our mandate the trial court properly dismissed the counterclaim. Appellant then sought, by motion, to have the trial court docket his counterclaim as a separate and independent action against ap-pellee-Hall, individually, and now appeals the trial court’s denial of this motion. We affirm.

Nothing herein, of course, nor in our pri- or decision is to be taken as res judicata on the merits of any claim appellant may have against appellee-Hall, individually, nor is appellant precluded from proceeding as he may be advised in a new, separate and independent action.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.

1

. Hall v. McDonough (Fla.App.2d 1968), 216 So.2d 84.
No. 9663.

#### The German Insurance Co. of Freeport, Ill., *v.*Cleckner.

(Decided January 8, 1907.)

Error to the Circuit Court of Shelby County.

*623*Messrs. Van*Pelt, *Dale & Ferneding*and *Mr. C. C. Flail,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. D. Barnes*and *Messrs. Wickoff, Emmons, & Needles,*for defendant in error.

Judgment modified as shown in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, modified for the reason that defendant in error should be adjudged to recover herein from plaintiff in error only its proportionate amount of the award of $682.49 rendered by the appraisers, as appears by the record. And, thereupon, this court proceeding to render the judgment which the circuit court of Shelby county should have rendered, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment of $619.48 so rendered against plaintiff in error herein, be reduced to $153.37, its proportionate amount of the award aforesaid; for which amount of $153.37, together with interest from the 8th day of January, 1907, judgment is hereby rendered against said plaintiff in error.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2


     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on form 10-KSB/A for the Year
Ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") by CaminoSoft Corp., the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

      3.    The Report complies in all material respects with the requirements
            of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
            amended, and

      4.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Registrant.


                                                 /s/ Michael Skelton
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Michael Skelton
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00525-CV

M. H., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY 

NO. 18-2091, THE HONORABLE MELISSA MCCLENAHAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant M. H. filed his notice of appeal on August 2, 2019. The appellate 

record was complete August 24, 2019, making appellant’s brief due September 13, 2019. On 

September 12, 2019, counsel for appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file appellant’s

brief.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals 

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days 

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting 

extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order counsel to file appellant’s brief 

no later than September 30, 2019. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required 

to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on September 13, 2019.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith
HHF Rhode Island Date: July 10, 2020

SCHEDULE A

BASIC INFORMATION

Eligible Entity Information: 

Name of the Eligible Entity: Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corporation1

Corporate or other organizational form: a public corporation of the state of Rhode 

Island, established and existing under the Rhode 

Island Housing and Mortgage Finance 

Corporation Act, as amended Chapter 42-55, 

State of Rhode Island General Laws.

Jurisdiction of organization: Rhode Island 

Notice Information:

HFA Information: 

Name of HFA: Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corporation1

Organizational form: a public corporation of the state of Rhode Island, 

established and existing under the Rhode Island 

Housing and Mortgage Finance Corporation 

Act, as amended Chapter 42-55, State of Rhode 

Island General Laws.

Date of Application: May 27, 2010 

Date of Action Plan: September 1, 2010 

Notice Information: 

Program Participation Cap:

Portion of Program Participation Cap

$116,019,791.00

Representing Original HHF Funds: $43,000,000.00

Portion of Program Participation Cap 

Representing Unemployment HHF Funds: $13,570,770.00

1 References in the Agreement to the term “HFA” shall mean the Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance 

Corporation (“Rhode Island Housing”) in its capacity as HFA as such term is used in the Agreement; and references 

in the Agreement to the term “Eligible Entity” shall mean Rhode Island Housing, in its capacity as Eligible Entity as 

such term is used in the Agreement.

A-1
Rounds 1-4 Funding Allocation: 

Round 5 Funding Allocation: 

Program Funds: 

Permitted Expenses: 

Closing Date: 

First Amendment Date: 

Second Amendment Date: 

Third Amendment Date: 

Fourth Amendment Date: 

Fifth Amendment Date: 

Sixth Amendment Date: 

Seventh Amendment Date: 

Eighth Amendment Date: 

Ninth Amendment Date: 

Tenth Amendment Date: 

Eleventh Amendment Date: 

$79,351,573.00 

$36,668,218.00 

$100,607,831.55 

$15,411,959.45 

August 3, 2010 

September 23, 2010 

September 29, 2010 

December 16, 2010 

May 25, 2011 

January 25, 2012 

March 29, 2012 

December 14, 2012 

July 17, 2013 

January 31, 2014 

November 24, 2015 

June 1, 2016 

Eligible Entity DepositoryAccount Information: See account information set forth in the 

Depository Account Control Agreement 

between Treasury and Eligible Entity 

regarding the HHF Program.

A-2
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED. CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE
BEEN REDACTED AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE COMMISSION.

                       [LOGO]SUNRISE TELECOM INCORPORATED

                  2002 Section 16 Executive Officer Bonus Plan

Executive Officers will participate in the 2002 Executive Officers Bonus Plan
(the "Executive Officers Bonus Plan") as stated below, subject to approval by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.

Executive Officers
------------------
Paul K. Chang - CEO & President
Paul A. Marshall - COO & VP Marketing
Peter L. Eidelman - CFO & Treasurer
Jeong E. Joo - CTO
Raffaele Gerbasi - President & General Manager Cable Broadband

                        2002 Section 16 Executive Officer
                               Bonus Plan Formula

1.   The Section 16 Executive Officer Bonus will be based on a percentage of
     their base compensation for the period enrolled in the plan.

2.   The bonus will be based on both the year's GAAP Net Income percentage, and
     sales growth percentage for the Consolidated Company. Any GM's included in
     this plan will be evaluated as well on their divisional performance in the
     same matrix with Executive Officers adjustments based on both divisional
     and the consolidated Company Growth and GAAP Net Income performance.

3.   The bonus should help to motivate the Executive Officers to achieve
     exceptional company financial performance, while providing little or no
     reward for lack of growth and profitability.

4.   In the event of a material corporate reorganization, the bonus may need to
     incorporate any change in the revenue mix and profit due to an acquisition
     or divestiture with the possible adjustment of the prior year base for the
     divisional impacted.


<PAGE>


5.   The Bonus will not be more than what is calculated below and is subject to
     approval by the compensation committee. Yearly net income, yearly sales,
     previous year sales are as reported on the company's audited financial
     statements.

Bonus = [*]

definitions:
p = year profit % = yearly net income / yearly sales
sg = sales growth percentage = (current year sales - previous year sales) /
previous year sales

     * Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission.

                                       2