alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005347EN.01002701.xml

| 30.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 347/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 347/27

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2180/2005

of 23 December 2005

fixing the amount of private storage aid for certain fishery products in the 2006 fishing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2813/2000 of 21 December 2000 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 as regards the grant of private storage aid for certain fishery products (2), and in particular Article 1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The aid should not exceed the sum of technical and financial costs recorded in the Community during the fishing year proceeding the year in question. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The aid should not exceed the sum of technical and financial costs recorded in the Community during the fishing year proceeding the year in question.

| (2) | To discourage long-term storage, to shorten payment times and to reduce the burden of controls, private storage aid should be paid in one single instalment. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

To discourage long-term storage, to shorten payment times and to reduce the burden of controls, private storage aid should be paid in one single instalment.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the Management Committee for Fishery Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the Management Committee for Fishery Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2006 fishing year the amount of private storage aid, referred to in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, for the products listed in Annex II to that Regulation shall be as follows:

| — | first month | : | EUR 200 per tonne, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| — | second month | : | EUR 0 per tonne. |

—

first month

:

EUR 200 per tonne,

—

second month

:

EUR 0 per tonne.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 December 2005.

For the Commission

Joe BORG

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p. 22. Regulation as amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 326, 22.12.2000, p. 30.

2

---
Exhibit (j)

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of DWS Portfolio Trust on Form N-1A ("Registration Statement") of our
report dated March 23, 2009, relating to the financial statements and financial
highlights which appears in the January 31, 2009 Annual Report to the
Shareholders of DWS Core Plus Income Fund, which is also incorporated by
reference into the Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to
us under the headings "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm",
"Financial Statements" and "Financial Highlights" in such Registration
Statement.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
April 27, 2009
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brad W. Rudover, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Electric Network.com, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financing reporting.

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 17, 2004

/s/ Brad W. Rudover________
Brad W. Rudover
President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
United States Department of the Treasury UST Sequence No. 160

M&T Bank Corporation

March 26, 2010

Signature Page

SIGNATURE PAGE TO MERGER TRANSACTION SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT

In witness whereof, this side letter agreement has been duly executed by the authorized

representatives of the parties hereto as of the date first above written.

M&T BANK CORPORATION

By:

Name: René F. Jones

Title: Executive Vice President & Chief

Financial Officer

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

THE TREASURY

By:

Name: Herbert M. Allison, Jr.

Title: Assistant Secretary for

Financial Stability
January 2021 1

Disclaimer: FHWA is committed to making its Information and Communication Technology (ICT) accessible by meeting the 

requirements of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The tools, resources, criteria and other items provided herein are 

for internal use by FHWA for ICT it procures, develops, maintains, and utilizes. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the 

use by third parties of the information contained in this document. 

Creating Accessible Excel Files Checklist 

FHWA HAD-21-006 

This checklist is a companion to “Creating Accessible Excel Files.” See that documentation for detailed 

discussion on any following checklist item.

Properties 

• The title is descriptive of the document. 

• The author is FHWA. 

• The default language is correct. 

• The file contains only content in the default language. 

• The file is saved as an xlsx. 

Structure 

• The reading order is logical, typically left to right, top to bottom, starting with cell A1. 

• Each worksheet tab has a descriptive and unique name. 

• Use heading styles in hierarchal order to give the content structure. 

• Use styles to indicate the cell’s purpose.

Tables 

• Tables are formatted as table. 

• The table name is descriptive and unique. 

• Header row and first column (if needed, it usually is) are checked. 

• For each table, ensure: 

o Each table has a descriptive caption. 

o Column and row headers contain descriptive content. 

o There are no row or column spans. 

o There is only one level of row and column headers. 

o There are no nested tables. 

o Data and headers are in separate cell. 

Other Considerations 

• Linked words are descriptive and unique. Do not use “click here,” “read more,” etc., for the 

links. 

• Symbols are inserted as their proper symbol. 

Text as Text 

• Text is rendered as text, not as an image. 
Creating Accessible Excel Files Checklist

FHWA HAD-21-006 December 2020 2

Background Information

• Ensure vital information is duplicated in the first cell of the worksheet.

Graphics/Objects

• Individual graphics are grouped to create a one graphic.

• The alt text describes the meaning of the image fully in as few words as possible.

• Figures that do not provide meaningful information contain “null” or “” in alt text.

• Alt text does not repeat the caption or other surrounding text.

• Alt text does not start with “this is an image of” since that is assumed.

Sensory Characteristics

• Avoid references to shape, size sound, color, or location.

Use of Color

• Color alone does not convey information. This applies to content including text, links, and 

graphs/charts.

Color contrast

• Text on a background meets minimum color contrast requirements. This includes graphics 

where an image of text is unavoidable.

Zoom

• Except for captions and images of text, text is resizable and readable when zoomed to 200% 

without assistive technology.

Movement

• There is no content that blinks or flashes.

Forms and Macros

• Contact the Agency Section 508 Program Manager if the Excel file contains forms and/or 

macros.

Embedded Media

• See “Creating Section 508 Conformant Multimedia.”
Exhibit
10.20.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


 


 


                THIS
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “First Amendment”) is
made and entered into this 25th day of April, 2001, by and between APCOA/Standard
Parking, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and James A.
Wilhelm (“Executive”).


 


RECITALS


 


A.                  The Company
and Executive are parties to an Executive Employment Agreement dated August 1,
1999 (the “Employment Agreement”).  All
capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the same
meaning ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement.


 


B.                   By Resolution
of the Board of Directors of the Company on August 25, 2000, Executive was
elected and made President of the Company.


 


B.                   The Company
and Executive desire to amend certain terms of the Employment Agreement, as
hereinafter set forth, to reflect changes in title, compensation and benefits
of Executive which became effective as of August 25, 2000.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in the following
respects:


 


1.                   The first
sentence of Paragraph 1. (a) is hereby amended by deleting the entire sentence
and substituting the following sentence in lieu thereof:


 


                      “The
Company agrees to employ Executive in the position of President, effective as
of August 25, 2000.”


 


2.                   The first
sentence of Paragraph 2. (a) is hereby amended by deleting the entire sentence
and substituting the following sentence in lieu thereof:


 


                                      “Salary.  Executive shall receive a base salary at the
rate of not less than $335,000, effective as of August 25, 2000.”


 


3.                   Subparagraph
(i) of paragraph 5 (g) is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence and
substituting the following sentence in lieu thereof:


 


                                      “
(i)       if Executive’s termination occurs
for any reason other than Cause, the sum of $167,500 in equal monthly
installments for up to eighteen months following the Date of Termination;”


 


 

















 


4.                   Except as
specifically amended by this First Amendment the Employment Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


                                      


IN WITNESS WHETREOF, Executive and the Company have executed this First
Amendment as of the day and year first above written.


 


                


APCOA/Standard Parking,
Inc.:


 


	
  By:  ______________________

  
	
   

  	
  Myron C. Warshauer

  
	
   

  	
  Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Executive:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  __________________________

  
	
  James A. Wilhelm
Order entered March 19, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-15-00276-CV

IN RE PETER BEASLEY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-13433



### ORDER

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.

We DENY relator’s motion for temporary relief as moot. We ORDER relator to bear the costs

of this original proceeding.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

129011 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129011 

 COA: 259427 

Berrien CC: 1999-404568-FC 

RICKY ALLEN NORWOOD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 23, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
# L_2005247EN.01002701.xml

| 23.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 247/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 247/27

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1548/2005

of 22 September 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 16 to 22 September 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Madison
Square Garden, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of §13(a) or §15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                       |  |                                                      |  | 
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date:    March 4, 2011 |  | /s/ Robert M. Pollichino                             |  | 
|                       |  | Robert M. Pollichino                                 |  | 
|                       |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### L. B. & D., INC., Appellant, v. Marvin C. HARDEN, d/b/a Harden-Campbell Insurance Agency and Independent Fire Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. II-2.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 23, 1978.

S. Perry Penland, of Penland, McCranie & Shad, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Paul M. Harden, of Smith, Davenport, Peek & Bloom, Jacksonville, for appellee Ma.rvin C. Harden.

Carl K. Staas, of Boyd, Jenerette, Leemis & Staas, P. A., Jacksonville, for appellee Independent Fire Ins. Co.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING GRANTED

PER CURIAM.

Appellee Harden points out in its petition for rehearing that the alleged January oral agreement on which we based our opinion reversing the summary judgment was first raised on appeal and was never urged at the trial level. The record reflects that appellant’s second amended complaint does in fact allege that the agreement took place in May, 1975, rather than January, 1975. Appellant has at no time requested leave to amend this complaint to clarify or alter the date of the alleged act. Without such a request, and without any reply to appellee’s contention in an Appellant’s Reply Brief or Answer to Petition for Rehearing, we must withdraw our previous opinion, grant the petition for rehearing, and affirm the summary judgment against appellant.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
* The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-2795

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * Lyle Veach, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 13, 2001 Filed: March 22, 2001

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and MONTGOMERY, * District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. This case arises from a reverse sting operation. Lyle Veach agreed to purchase one pound of methamphetamine from a supplier so he could resell it. Unbeknownst to Veach, the supplier was a Government agent and the substance Veach bought was counterfeit

rather than the real thing. Under a written plea agreement, Veach pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute over 500 grams of a substance containing** The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa. -2- methamphetamine. In deciding Veach's base offense level at sentencing, the district court ** included the pound of counterfeit methamphetamine. The district court sentencedVeach to 135 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release. Onappeal, Veach asserts that although he believed he was buying a pound of real methamphetamine, the fake pound should not have been included in deciding his base offense level. The district court correctly included the weight of the bogus drug based onVeach's agreement to buy that amount of methamphetamine. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 n.12. We thus affirm Veach's sentence. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.