alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26367]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-776-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

September 30, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 26, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline 
Company (Koch Gateway), P.O. Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77251-1478, filed 
in Docket No. CP97-776-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.205, 157.216) for authorization to abandon eleven delivery taps 
in Hancock, Harrison and Jackson Counties, Mississippi, under Koch 
Gateway's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-430, pursuant 
to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the 
request that is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Koch Gateway requests authorization to abandon eleven (11) farm 
taps on its Index 276 transmission pipeline in Hancock, Harrison and 
Jackson Counties Mississippi. Koch Gateway states that it is taking 
steps to implement the order issued on June 21, 1994 in FERC Docket No. 
CP94-76-000 to abandon by sale to Koch Pipeline, Inc., a subsidiary of 
Koch Industries, Inc., its Index 276 transmission pipeline. In its 
application for abandonment Koch Gateway indicated that is would make 
prior notice filings to abandon existing delivery taps on the Index 276 
and that this instant filing is one of those filings.
    Koch Gateway proposes to plug each tap and remove all valves and 
above-ground appurtenances at the various locations. Koch Gateway 
states that these farm taps were originally certificated in FPC Docket 
No. G-232, and that the taps are inactive and no services will be 
affected by the proposed abandonment. Koch Gateway states that Entex, 
Inc. (Entex), the local distribution company through which these farm 
tap services were previously provided, has removed its metering 
facilities at each farm tap location, and that Entex has agreed to the 
proposed abandonment.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26367 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Larry Darnell JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1908.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 26, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Warren S. Schwartz, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal by the defendant below, from conviction of robbery, it is contended it was reversible error for the prosecutor to seek to impeach the defendant’s exculpatory story told for the first time at trial, by cross-examining the defendant about his failure to have told that story to the police after receiving his *Miranda*warnings at the time of his arrest; and for comment thereon by the prosecutor later in argument. Due objections were made on behalf of the defendant and motion for mistrial was denied. In *Doyle*v. *Ohio,*426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976) which is in point, the court held “that use of post-arrest silence in this manner violates due process”.

Accordingly, on the authority of *Doyle v. Ohio,*supra, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for new trial.
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Stephen A. Lasota, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Cowen Group, Inc.; and

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date:  May 2, 2011

 

 
|     | /s/ Stephen A. Lasota                                              |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     | Stephen A. Lasota                                                  |
| * * | *Chief Financial Officer*                                          |
| * * | *(principal financial officer and principal   accounting officer)* |

 

----
#### WINTER PARK PINES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. Russell E. THEISEN; E. H. Wilmoth; Rudolph Bieberle; Lou Hofma; Alex Simons; E. H. Menting; Wilma Hancock; William Hanay; Joseph W. Magee, Sr., Paul Pickett, Ben Benham, Sanford Padgett and Ralph Poe, as and constituting the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County, Florida, Appellees.

No. 69-595.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 11, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
254 La. 833

#### KAEL, INC., d/b/a “Original Papa Joe’s” et al. v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 50193.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 7, 1969.

In re: Kael, Inc., D/B/A “Original Papa Joe’s” et al. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and review.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
##### 



Exhibit 10.32 (ESS LOGO) December 7, 2004 Mr. James Boyd
Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
ESS Technology, Inc. Dear Jim, The Board of Directors has recognized your dedication and determined that appropriate steps should
be taken to reinforce and encourage your continued attention to your position as our CFO and Senior
Vice President and therefore has authorized a Retention Incentive Bonus for you. This Retention
Incentive Bonus will be $90,000 and will be paid within 5 days of your agreeing to the terms of
this agreement, subject to normal withholding amounts. In consideration for this Retention Incentive Bonus, you agree to remain with the Company through
March 1, 2006 to ensure the 2005 Financial Books of the Company are appropriately and correctly
closed. In addition, as part of your agreement in accepting this Retention Incentive Bonus, if you elect to
leave the Company prior to March 1, 2006, by your signature below, you agree to give the Company a
90 day written notice of your intent to leave to ensure a smooth transition of your duties. Should
you leave the Company and give a 90 day notice, you agree to pay back to the Company a prorated
amount of your after tax (calculated at 60%) Retention Incentive Bonus. If you elect to leave the Company prior to March 1, 2006 and not give such 90 day notice as
mentioned above, then by your signature below you agree to pay the Retention Incentive Bonus (the
after tax portion, calculated at 60%) back in full to the Company. This Retention Incentive Bonus is in addition to your regular bonus which will be paid in 2005
after evaluating achievements vs. goals in the plan. Jim, your hard work and dedication are appreciated and respected within ESS Technology, Inc. Sincerely, /s/ Robert L. Blair
Robert L. Blair
CEO /s/ James Boyd
James Boyd Date: 12/7/04 cc:                    Bd. Of Directors 48401 Fremont Blvd.  Fremont, CA 94538  Tel: 510-492-1088  Fax: 510-492-1098
No. 9931.

#### Boyer *v.*Boyer et al.

(Decided October 16, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Montgomery County.

*Messrs. McMahon & McMahon*and *Mr. P. H. Rue,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Kennedy, Munger & Kennedy*and *Mr.*, *W. H. Griffith,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C- J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
Order entered May 9 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00421

- CR

GEORGE RALPH BEACHEM , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 29 6 th Ju dicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296

- 82711

- 2019

O RDER

Before the Court is the State ’ s May 3, 2022 motion for an extension of time

to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received along wi th

the motion fi led as of the date of this order.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
# L_2005249EN.01001401.xml

| 24.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 249/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 249/14

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1562/2005

of 23 September 2005

determining the extent to which applications lodged in September 2005 for import licences for certain poultrymeat sector products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2497/96 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2497/96 of 18 December 1996 laying down rules for the application in the poultrymeat sector of the system provided for by the Association Agreement and the Interim Agreement between the European Community and the State of Israel (1), and in particular Article 4(5) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged for the period from 1 October to 31 December 2005 are, in the case of certain products, for quantities less than or equal to the quantities available and can therefore be met in full, but in the case of other products the said applications are for quantities greater than the quantities available and must therefore be reduced by a fixed percentage to ensure a fair distribution,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for import licences for the period 1 October to 31 December 2005 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2497/96 shall be met as referred to in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 September 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 338, 28.12.1996, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 361/2004 (OJ L 63, 28.2.2004, p. 15).

1

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period from 1 October to 31 December 2005 |
| --- | --- |
| I1 | 6,493506 |
| I2 | 100,00 |

Group No

Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period from 1 October to 31 December 2005

I1

6,493506

I2

100,00

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28817]



[[Page 59028]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33492]


State of Oklahoma by and Through the Oklahoma Department of 
Transportation and Blackwell Industrial Authority--Acquisition 
Exemption--Central Kansas Railway, L.L.C.

    The State of Oklahoma, a noncarrier, by and through the Oklahoma 
Department of Transportation (ODOT), and Blackwell Industrial Authority 
(BIA), also a noncarrier, have filed a notice of exemption under 49 CFR 
1150.31 to acquire separate segments of approximately 35.3 miles of 
rail line (lines) from the Central Kansas Railway, L.L.C. ODOT will 
acquire the segment of the line between milepost 34.3, at Blackwell, 
OK, and milepost 18.0+ 1712.9 feet, at the Oklahoma/Kansas state line 
near Hun Newell, KS. BIA will acquire the segments of the line (1) 
between milepost 35.0+ 1848 feet, west of Blackwell, OK, and milepost 
34.3, at Blackwell, OK, and (2) between milepost 18+ 1712.9 feet, at 
the Oklahoma/Kansas state line near Hun Newell, KS, and milepost 0+ 
466.3 feet, at Wellington, KS.
    South Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad, Inc., a Class III rail carrier, 
has filed a notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 in STB Finance 
Docket No. 33494, South Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad, Inc.--Operation 
Exemption--Oklahoma Department of Transportation and Blackwell 
Industrial Authority to operate the lines.
    The transaction was expected to be consummated on or after October 
16, 1997.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33492, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Eric M. Hocky, Esq., Gollatz, Griffin & Ewing, P.C., 213 W. 
Miner Street, P. O. Box 796, West Chester, PA 19381-0796.

    Decided: October 22, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28817 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
# -Model Release Form-

# US Department of Transportation

# Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

# Name:

# Location:

# Date:

# I hereby grant to the FHWA the absolute and irrevocable right and permission, in respect of the photographs or audio or videotape recording and their transcripts, that it has taken or has had taken of me or in which I may be included with others, to copyright the same, in its own name or otherwise (and assign my rights throughout the world in such photograph and audio and video recordings and their transcripts), to use, reuse, publish, and republish, and otherwise reproduce, modify and display the same, in whole or in part, individually or with other photographs, and with any copyrighted matter, in any and all media now or hereafter known, for illustration, promotion, art, advertising and trade, or any other purpose whatsoever; and to use my name in connection therewith if it so chooses.

# I hereby release and discharge FHWA from any and all claims and demands arising out of, or in connection to, the use of the photographs, including without limitation any and all claims for libel or invasion of privacy.  FHWA may sell, assign license, or otherwise transfer all rights granted to it hereunder.

# This authorization and release shall also inure to the benefit of the specific legal representatives, licensees, and assigns of the FHWA, as well as the staff representative(s) (if any) for whom it took the photographs.

# I am of full age and have the right to contract in my own name.  I have read the foregoing and fully understand the contents thereof.  This release shall be binding upon me and my heirs, legal representatives and assigns.  I further release the FHWA from any responsibility for injury incurred during the photography or audio or videotaping session.

# Signed: 

# (If minor, parent or legal guardian must sign.)

# Printed Name:

# 

# Address:

# 

# City, State, Zip

# Phone:

# Fax Number:

# Date:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Sunrise Telecom Incorporated:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-43270) of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated, of our report dated
January 24, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Sunrise Telecom
Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of net income, stockholders' equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report
on Form 10-K of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated.

                                             KPMG LLP
Mountain View, California
March 15, 2001
[Detailed Description of this Exhibit 11.1: Statement re: Computation of
Weighted Average Number of Common and Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding]


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                               Asahi/America, Inc.
          Statement of Computation of Weighted Average Number of Common
                    and Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding


                                               For the years ended December 31,
                                               1994          1995         1996
                                               ----          ----         ----

Weighted average common shares outstanding   2,340,000    2,340,000    2,972,877

Common and common equivalent shares             -            -            15,055
                                             ---------    ---------    ---------

Weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding         2,340,000    2,340,000    2,987,932
                                             =========    =========    =========
#### Frank H. AUTREY and Betty Autrey, his wife, Appellants, v. Anne M. CARROLL, Executrix of the Estate of Frank E. Carroll, deceased, Appellee.

No. 69-72.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 22, 1970.

Snyder, Young & Stern, North Miami Beach and Michael H. Oritt, North Miami, for appellants.

Blackwell, Walker & Gray and James E. Tribble, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES. CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on October 28, 1969 (227 So.2d 697) affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed October 7, 1970 (240 So.2d 474) and mandate dated November 24, 1970, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s opinion and judgment and remanded the cause with directions to further remand the cause to the trial court with instructions to set aside the judgment for defendant and grant a new trial;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on November 19, 1969 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed October 28, 1969 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to set aside the judgment for the defendant and grant a new trial. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b) F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.).
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly report of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 3, 2010


By:
/s/ David KoosDavid KoosActing Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. and will be retained by Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit (e)(2)**

**Global/International Fund, Inc.**

**345 Park Avenue**

**New York, New York 10154-0010**

 

September 30, 2002, as amended June 24, 2008

 

Scudder Distributors, Inc.

222 South Riverside Plaza

Chicago, IL 60606

 

Underwriting Agreement

 

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

DWS Global/International Fund, Inc. (hereinafter called the “Fund”) is a corporation organized under the laws of Maryland and is engaged in the business of an investment company.  The authorized capital of the Fund consists of shares of capital stock, with par value of $0.01 per share (“Shares”), currently divided into five (5) portfolios (each a “Series”).  The Series and, if applicable, the classes thereof to which this agreement applies are included under Schedule A.  Shares may be divided into additional Series of the Fund and the Series may be terminated from time to time.  The Fund has selected you to act as principal underwriter (as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(29) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)) of the Shares and you are willing to act as such principalunderwriter and to perform the duties and functions of underwriter in the manner and on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.  Accordingly, the Fund hereby agrees with you as follows:

1.         Delivery of Documents.  The Fund has furnished you with copies properly certified or authenticated of each of the following:

|   | (a) | Charter of the Fund, dated June 23, 2006, as amended to date. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | By-Laws of the Fund as in effect on the date hereof. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (c) | Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Fund selecting you as principal underwriter and approving this form of Agreement. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

----
Step 1                    Identify                    Stakeholders                

                    Step 2                    Use                    Safety Data                

                    Step 3                    Choose Proven                    Solutions                

                    Step 4                    Implement                    Solutions                

                    Finish Line                

# LCSI Training Seminar

Click here to download LCSI Training Slides

Content will open in a new window

## Tools and Resources

Countermeasures
              - FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures
              - NHTSA Countermeasures That Work Tech Brief
              - Manual for Selecting Safety Improvements on High Risk Rural Roads
              - NHTSA Countermeasures That Work 9th Edition
              - Decision Tree Tools - COMING SOON
              - Decision Tree Example 1
              - Decision Tree Example 2

Training
              - Tutorial - Choose Proven Solutions
              - Systemic Approach Training – Part 2
              - Low-Cost Safety Improvements Training

Helpful Links
              - FHWA Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse