alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3805 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to prohibit health plans from 

imposing fees on health care providers for electronic funds transfers 

and health care payment and remittance advice transactions, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2024 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

health plans from imposing fees on health care providers 

for electronic funds transfers and health care payment 

and remittance advice transactions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Fees for EFTs 

5 Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3805 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING HEALTH PLANS FROM IMPOSING 

2 FEES ON HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS FOR 

3 ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS AND 

4 HEALTH CARE PAYMENT AND REMITTANCE 

5 ADVICE TRANSACTIONS. 

6 Section 1173(g)(4)(B)(ii) of the Social Security Act 

7 (42 U.S.C. 1320d–2(g)(4)(B)(ii)) is amended— 

8 (1) in subclause (I), by striking at the end 

9 ‘‘and’’; 

10 (2) in subclause (II), by striking at the end the 

11 period and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub13 clause: 

14 ‘‘(III) prohibit the imposition of 

15 any charge, fee, or other payment (in16 cluding through a withhold from pay17 ment) by a health plan or entity com18 pleting the transaction on the plan’s 

19 behalf, on a health care provider for 

20 electronic fund transfers and health 

21 care payment and remittance advice 

22 transactions made on or after Janu23 ary 1, 2025.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-34362) pertaining to 1,750,000 shares of common stock of Optical
Sensors Incorporated, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-04373)
pertaining to the Optical Sensors Incorporated 1989 Omnibus Stock Option Plan
and the Optical Sensors Incorporated 1993 Stock Option Plan, and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-17493) pertaining to the Optical
Sensors Incorporated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and in the Registration
Statement (Form SB-2 No. 333-71076) pertaining to 15,583,333 shares of common
stock of Optical Sensors Incorporated, and in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-71354) pertaining to the Optical Sensors Incorporated 1993 Stock
Option Plan, of our report dated February 27, 2004, with respect to the
financial statements of Optical Sensors Incorporated included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2003.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 7, 2004
#### Norman COHEN, Appellant, v. Frederic H. WARREN, Appellee.

No. 76-2305.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 20, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 23, 1978.

Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Richman & Greer and Bruce A. Christensen, Miami, for appellant.

Meyer, Weiss, Rose, Arkin, Sheppard & Shockett and S. Harvey Ziegler, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.

*878PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Clark v. Wilder,*192 So.2d 32 (Fla.3d DCA 1966); *Maule Industries, Inc. v. Watson,*201 So.2d 631 (Fla.3d DCA 1967); *Dixon v. Thompson,*217 So.2d 887 (Fla.1st DCA 1969).
Date,"1 Mo","2 Mo","3 Mo","4 Mo","6 Mo","1 Yr","2 Yr","3 Yr","5 Yr","7 Yr","10 Yr","20 Yr","30 Yr"
02/23/2024,5.49,5.51,5.46,5.46,5.32,5.00,4.67,4.45,4.28,4.28,4.26,4.51,4.37
02/22/2024,5.49,5.51,5.45,5.45,5.32,5.02,4.69,4.49,4.33,4.35,4.33,4.58,4.47
02/21/2024,5.50,5.50,5.44,5.45,5.32,4.98,4.64,4.43,4.30,4.33,4.32,4.59,4.49
02/20/2024,5.49,5.49,5.44,5.45,5.32,4.97,4.59,4.38,4.25,4.28,4.27,4.56,4.44
02/16/2024,5.48,5.51,5.44,5.45,5.31,4.98,4.64,4.43,4.29,4.31,4.30,4.58,4.45
02/15/2024,5.49,5.51,5.43,5.45,5.30,4.93,4.56,4.36,4.22,4.25,4.24,4.54,4.42
02/14/2024,5.48,5.51,5.43,5.45,5.31,4.94,4.56,4.38,4.25,4.27,4.27,4.57,4.45
02/13/2024,5.48,5.52,5.45,5.46,5.32,4.99,4.64,4.44,4.31,4.33,4.31,4.59,4.46
02/12/2024,5.49,5.51,5.43,5.43,5.27,4.87,4.46,4.25,4.13,4.16,4.17,4.48,4.37
02/09/2024,5.49,5.51,5.44,5.43,5.26,4.86,4.48,4.25,4.14,4.17,4.17,4.48,4.37
02/08/2024,5.49,5.51,5.44,5.42,5.24,4.83,4.46,4.22,4.12,4.15,4.15,4.47,4.36
02/07/2024,5.47,5.49,5.43,5.40,5.23,4.83,4.41,4.16,4.06,4.09,4.09,4.41,4.31
02/06/2024,5.48,5.50,5.44,5.41,5.23,4.82,4.39,4.14,4.03,4.07,4.09,4.39,4.29
02/05/2024,5.49,5.50,5.42,5.42,5.25,4.87,4.46,4.27,4.13,4.16,4.17,4.46,4.35
02/02/2024,5.49,5.51,5.43,5.42,5.22,4.81,4.36,4.14,3.99,4.02,4.03,4.33,4.22
02/01/2024,5.49,5.51,5.42,5.38,5.15,4.68,4.20,3.96,3.80,3.83,3.87,4.21,4.10
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly report of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Koos, Chairman of the Board, President and Acting Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: July 12, 2010


By:
/s/ David KoosDavid KoosActing Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bio-matrix Scientific Group, Inc. and will be retained by Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      5,000,00
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00



</TABLE>
259 La. 69

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Henry ANDERSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51538.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 24, 1971.

In re: Henry Anderson applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

Writ granted. A contradictory hearing by the trial judge is ordered on the issue of whether counsel was present at applicant’s sentencing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6567

JEFFREY LEE HALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TIM BARBOUR, Lieutenant Colonel, Assistant

Superintendent; KIMBERLY K. ROYAL; TIMOTHY

LIGHTBOURNE, Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CA-01-236-AM)

Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: July 5, 2001

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Lee Hall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Lee Hall appeals the district court’s order dismissing

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Hall v. Barbour, No. CA-01-236-AM (E.D. Va. filed

Mar. 26, 2001; entered Mar. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 366 

To direct the Administrator of General Services to ensure that the design 

of public buildings in the United States adheres to the guiding principles 

for Federal architecture, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN (for himself and Mr. LUJA ́N) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of General Services to ensure 

that the design of public buildings in the United States 

adheres to the guiding principles for Federal architecture, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Democracy in Design 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 366 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUING INVESTIGATION AND SURVEY OF PUB2 LIC BUILDINGS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3303 of title 40, United 

4 States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding 

6 paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘(referred to in this sec7 tion as the ‘Administrator’)’’ after ‘‘Services’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(e) GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR FEDERAL ARCHITEC10 TURE.—The Administrator shall ensure that the design of 

11 public buildings in the United States adheres to the prin12 ciples described in the report published by the Ad Hoc 

13 Committee on Federal Office Space entitled ‘Guiding 

14 Principles for Federal Architecture’ and dated June 1, 

15 1962.’’. 

16 (b) RULEMAKING.— 

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 

18 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Adminis19 trator of General Services shall promulgate such reg20 ulations as are necessary— 

21 (A) to implement the amendment made by 

22 subsection (a)(2); and 

23 (B) to establish minimum standards by 

24 which the Administrator of General Services 

25 shall design public buildings in the United 

26 States. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 366 IS

1 (2) NOTICE AND COMMENT.—The regulations 

2 required under paragraph (1) shall be issued after 

3 notice and an opportunity for public comment in ac4 cordance with the procedure applicable to sub5 stantive rules under section 553 of title 5, United 

6 States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Henry G. WASSERLEIN, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-163.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 31, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 5, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
APPENDIX VIII 

IDAHO HANDLER ACTIVITY COUNT REPORT' 

July 1,2011 

Total Number of Handlers {includes inactive/non-notifier sites) ................................ 3,089 


Total Number of Active Generators ............................................................................. 968 


Large Quantity Generators ............................................................................................ 24 


Small Quantity Generators .......................................................................................... 113 


Conditional Exempt SQGs ........................................................................................... 831 


HW Transporters .......................................................................................................... .46 


Subject to CEI Universe (Calculated Universe) ............................................................. 10 


BIFs o 

Incinerators o 

Land Disposers 10 

Treatment/Storage 3 

Used Oit Fuel Handlers (Notifiers) .................. " ............................................................. 43 


1$t Spec Marketers 17 

Off-Spec Burners 10 

Off-Spec Marketers 8 

Processers/Re-Refiners 5 

Transporters 30 

Universal Waste Handlers (Idaho Department of Agriculture) ....................................... 18 


Source: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Infonnation (RCRAlnfo). Idaho State Notifiers Database 

(generated from the Notification of Regulated Waste Activity Forms [8700-12] submitted to DEQ). 

File: IH (RCRA Admin)
Exhibit 24
   Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ John C. East

(John C. East)
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and
Director
    
    March 12, 2010/s/ Maurice E. Carson

(Maurice E. Carson)
    
    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
    
    March 12, 2010/s/ James R. Fiebiger

(James R. Fiebiger)
    
    Director
    
    March 12, 2010/s/ Jacob S. Jacobsson

(Jacob S. Jacobsson)
    
    Director
    
    March 12, 2010/s/ Patrick W. Little

(Patrick W. Little)
    
    Director
    
    March 12, 2010/s/ J. Daniel McCranie

(J. Daniel McCranie)
    
    Director
    
    March 12, 2010/s/ Jeffrey C. Smith

(Jeffrey C. Smith)
    
    Director
    
    March 12,2010/s/ Robert G. Spencer

(Robert G. Spencer)
    
    Director
    
    March 12, 2010/s/ Eric J. Zahler

(Eric J. Zahler)
    
    Director
    
    March 12, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28858]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Request for Public Comments on Extension of Existing Information 
Collection To Be Submitted to OMB for Review Under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act

    A request extending the information collection described below will 
be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for approval under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)). Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by 
contacting the Bureau's clearance officer at the phone number listed 
below. Public comments on the proposal should be made within 60 days 
directly to the Bureau Clearance Officer, U.S. Geological survey, 807 
National Center, Reston, VA 20192.
    As required by OMB regulations at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), the U.S. 
Geological Survey solicits specific public comments as to:
    1. Whether the collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions on the bureaus, including whether 
the information will have practical utility;
    2. The accuracy of the bureau's estimate of the burden of the 
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used:
    3. The quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and.
    4. How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology.
    Title: North American Reporting Center for Amphibian Malformations.
    OMB Approval No: 1028-0056.
    Summary: The collection of information referred herein applies to a 
World-Wide Web site that permits individuals who observed malformed 
amphibians or who inspect substantial numbers of normal or malformed 
amphibians to report those observations and related information. The 
Web site is termed the North American Reporting Center for Amphibian 
Malformations. Information will be used by scientists and federal, 
state and local agencies to identify areas where malformed amphibians 
occur and the rates of occurrence.
    Estimated Completion Times: 20 minutes.
    Estimated Annual Number Of Respondents: 900.
    Frequency: Once.
    300 hours: 300 hours.
    Affected Public: Primarily U.S. and Canadian residents.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
To obtain copies of the survey, contact the Bureau clearance office, 
U.S. Geological Survey, 807 National Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley 
Drive, Reston, Virginia, 20192, telephone (703) 648-7313, or go to the 
Web Site (http://www.npsc.nbs.gov./narcam).

    Dated: October 20, 1997.
Susan Haseltine,
Deputy Chief Biologist for Science.
[FR Doc. 97-28858 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-31-M
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220

October 4, 2013

Mr. James J. Duffy

Chief Human Resources Officer
Ally Financial Inc.

1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036

Re: Compensation Payments and Structure for Ally “Top 25” Employee
Dear Mr. Duffy:

Pursuant to the Department of the Treasury’s Interim Final Rule on TARP Standards for
Compensation and Corporate Governance (the “Rule”),! on April 26, 2013, the Office of the
Special Master issued a determination letter (the “2013 Determination Letter”) to Ally Financial
Inc. (“Ally”), with respect to 2013 compensation payments and structures for Ally’s “top 25”
executive officers and most highly compensated employees. 31 C.F.R. § 30.16(a)(3)(i).

Ally has requested a change in the compensation for a particular employee who has
received a significant promotion that will substantially increase the employee’s responsibilities.
The total direct compensation that Ally has proposed for this employee would be below the 50%
percentile of total direct compensation paid to persons in similar positions or roles at similar
entities. The change would be effective as of October 7, 2013. In light of the particular facts as
communicated by Ally with respect to the employee’s promotion and role at Ally, and as
previously discussed with you, the Office of the Special Master has approved this request.
Accordingly, Exhibit I to the 2013 Determination Letter is hereby amended as follows:

Long-Term Total Direct
Employee ID Cash Salary Stock Salary Restricted Stock Compensation
159613 $491,000 $1,480,900 $219,100 $2,191,000

The approval in this letter applies only to the employee referenced above and shall not be
relied upon by anyone with respect to any other facts or circumstances. Such conclusion is
limited to the authority vested in the Office of the Special Master by Section 30.16(a)(3) of the
Rule, and shall not constitute, or be construed to constitute, the judgment of the Office of the
Special Master or the Department of the Treasury with respect to the compliance of the proposed
compensation payments or structure or any other compensation payments or structure for the

' The Interim Final Rule and all determination letters issued by the Office of the Special Master are available at
www. financialstability.gov (click on “Executive Compensation”).



subject employee with any other provision of the Rule. Moreover, my evaluations and
conclusions with respect to this employee have relied upon, and are qualified in their entirety by,
the accuracy of the materials submitted by Ally to the Office of the Special Master, and the
absence of any material misstatement or omission in such materials.

truly yours,

Patricia Geoghegan

Office of the Special Master
for TARP Executive Compensation

cc: Richard Strahota
Drema M. Kalajian, Esq.
EXHIBIT 99.2



Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-K of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report), I,
Paul A. Marshall, Acting Chief Financial Officer of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 14, 2003



/s/    PAUL A.
MARSHALLPaul A. Marshall Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
#### Reida DeCOIL v. Joseph DeCOIL.

No. 38149.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 216 So.2d 39.
Exhibit 31.2








Certification of the Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)


(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Ronald T. Hundzinski, certify that:





1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BorgWarner Inc.;





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;










Date:  March 30, 2016





/s/ Ronald T. HundzinskiRonald T. HundzinskiVice President and Chief Financial Officer