alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                              EXHIBIT 10.2(6)(b)

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                      BELO 2000 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


         Belo Corp., a Delaware corporation, pursuant to authorization by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, adopts the following
amendments to its 2000 Executive Compensation Plan (the "Plan").

         1. Paragraph 2(l) of the Plan ("Management Objectives") is amended by
the addition of the following paragraph:

                  In addition, the Committee may, in its discretion, establish
         other measurable performance objectives, in lieu of or in addition to
         the performance objectives set forth above, in connection with any
         Award granted to a Participant, provided, however, that if the
         Participant to whom such other performance objectives would apply is a
         covered employee within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code at
         the time the Award is granted or is likely to become a covered employee
         at any time during the Performance Period, the Committee determines
         that the application of such other performance objectives would not
         result in the loss of the otherwise available exemption of the Award
         under Section 162(m) of the Code.

         2. The phrase "the earliest age that qualifies as Early Retirement Age
under The G. B. Dealey Retirement Pension Plan, as amended from time to time,"
is amended in each place it appears in the Plan to read "at least age 55 and
completing at least three years of service (computed in the same manner as years
of service are computed under the Belo Savings Plan),".

         3. Appendix A to the Plan ("Termination Guidelines") is amended in its
entirety to read as set forth on Schedule 1 to this Amendment.

         4. References in the Plan to "the Company" are amended to refer to
"Belo".

         5. The foregoing amendments will be effective with respect to Awards
made on and after the date of this Amendment.

         Executed at Dallas, Texas, this 5th day of December, 2002.

                                       BELO CORP.


                                       By  /s/ Marian Spitzberg
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Marian Spitzberg
                                           Senior Vice President/Human Resources
#### In re ESTATE of Michael JANSEN, a/k/a Michael M. Jansen, Deceased.

No. 70-119.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

Stephen R. Magyer, Orlando, for appellant.

Paul Revere Berglund, and Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a petition for revocation of the probate of the will of Michael M. Jansen. After trial of the issues presented the-trial judge denied the petition. *199Appellant’s sole contention on this appeal is that as a matter of law (no record of the trial being presented to this court) the will was not dispositive of the estate. The order appealed is affirmed upon authority of In re Levy’s Estate, Fla.App. 1967, 196 So.2d 225, 229.

Affirmed.
#### George RITTENHOUSE, Appellant, v. Bert LEDER, Appellee.

No. 77-2368.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 25, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 6, 1978.

Nachwaiter, Christie & Falk and Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellant.

*785Shupack & Weisser and Michael H. Weis-ser, North Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Bullock v. Harwick,*158 Fla. 834, 30 So.2d 539 (1947). See also *City Builders Finance Co.*v. *Stahl,*90 Fla. 357, 106 So. 77 (1925); 7 Fla.Jur. “Contracts” § 47 (1956).
No. 9508.

#### Erie Railroad Company *v.*Hine, Admr.

(Decided January 22, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Portage County.

*Messrs. Cushing & Clarke*and *Mr. I. T. Sid-doll,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. C. D. Ingell*and *Mr. R. S. Webb,*for defendant in error.

*630Judgment of the-circuit court reversed and that of the common pleas affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis,, JJ., concur.
Order entered November 26, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01252-CV

NATHAN WEILBACHER, Appellant

V.

MELODIE CRAFT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-06130-J

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s November 21, 2013 unopposed second motion for an extension 

of time to file a brief. Appellant shall file his brief on or before December 10, 2013. We caution 

appellant that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28792]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33494]


South Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad, Inc.--Operation Exemption--
Oklahoma Department of Transportation and Blackwell Industrial 
Authority

    South Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad, Inc., a Class III rail carrier, 
has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to 
operate approximately 35.3 miles of rail line owned by the State of 
Oklahoma by and through the Oklahoma Department of Transportation and 
Blackwell Industrial Authority (1) between milepost 34.3, at Blackwell, 
OK, and milepost 18.0+ 1712.9 feet, at the Oklahoma/Kansas state line 
near Hun Newell, KS, (2) between milepost 35.0+ 1848 feet, west of 
Blackwell, OK, and milepost 34.3, at Blackwell, OK, and (3) between 
milepost 18+ 1712.9 feet, at the Oklahoma/Kansas state line near Hun 
Newell, KS, and milepost 0+ 466.3 feet, at Wellington, KS.
    The transaction was expected to be consummated on or after October 
16, 1997.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33494, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Karl Morrell, Esq., Ball Janik LLP, Suite 225, 1455 F Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20005.

    Decided: October 22, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28792 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50572 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

− Appellee ,
v ersus CIRO CRUZ

- LOPEZ, also known as Juan Pablo, also known as Mario Garica

- Gonzales, also known as Mario Gonzales, also known as Juan Pablo Mendoza, also known as Juan Mendoza, also known as Ciro Lopez

- Cruz, also known as Rufino Garcia, also known as Mario G onzales

- Garcia, also known as Alberto Garcia

- Garcia, also known as Cruz Cruz, also known as Victor Peiro

- Pablo, also known as Mario Gonzalez, also known as Juna Mendoza

- Pablo, also known as Mario Garcia , Defendant

− Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas No. 5:18

- CR

- 784

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 5, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50572 Document: 00515298762 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/05/2020No. 19

- 50572

2 Ciro Cruz

- Lopez appeals his conviction o f illegal reentry into the United States following remova l in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He entered a condi

tional guilty plea, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. He contends that the indictment was invalid because the removal order was void for defective notic e to appear that failed to specify the date and time for his removal hearing. He concedes that the issue is fore

closed by United States v. Pedroza

- Rocha , 933 F.3d 490 (5th Cir. 2019), petition for cert. filed (U.S. Nov. 6, 2019) (No. 19

- 6588), and Pierre

- Paul v. Barr , 930 F.3d 684 (5th Cir. 2019), petition for cert. filed (U.S. Dec. 16, 2019) (No. 19

- 779) , but he wishes to preserve it for further review. The g overnment moves for
sum mary affirmance, agreeing that the issue is foreclosed under Pedroza

Rocha and Pierre

- Paul

. In Pedroza

- Rocha , 933 F.3d at 496−98, this court applied Pierre

- Paul to conclude that the notice to appear was not rendered deficient because it did not specify a date or time for the heari ng, that any such alleged deficiency had not deprived the immi gration court of jurisdiction, and that Pedroza

- Rocha could not collater ally attack his underlying removal order without first ex

hausting his adminis tra tive remedies. As Cruz

- Lopez concede s, his arguments are foreclosed. See id. Because the g overnment ’ s position “ is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case, ” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1 969), the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the g overnment ’ s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judg ment is AFFIRMED.

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. Case: 19-50572 Document: 00515298762 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/05/2020
Q Eastern Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle
visi ing, VA 20166-6511

US.Department Highway Division Sterling,

of Transportation

Federal Highway
Administration

SENT VIA ELECTRONIC CORRESPONDENCE
MAY -9 2013 In Reply Refer to: HFPP-15

Mr. Sean Connaughton

Secretary

Virginia Department of Transportation
1401 East Broad Street

Richmond, VA 23219

Subject: _ MAP-21 Access Program Programming Decisions Committee Members
Dear Mr. Connaughton:

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141,
includes the establishment of the new Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP). This new
program will be administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FH WA) Office of Federal
Lands Highway. Virginia is served by the Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD)
office in Sterling, Virginia.

A key requirement for implementing the FLAP is to coordinate the establishment of a three
member Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for programming the FLAP
funds allocated to each state. Each state level PDC consists of a representative from the Federal
Lands Highway Division office, the State Department of Transportation, and an organization or
entity that is suited to represent the local entities responsible for building, operating, or
maintaining transportation facilities that are located on, are adjacent to, or provide access to
Federal lands. Our program managers have coordinated with your department and have
identified the following positions that will fulfill the PDC requirement:

FLAP Program Manager, FHWA, EFLHD
Special Federal Programs Manager, Virginia Department of Transportation
County Administrator, Virginia Association of Counties


Additional information on the implementation of FLAP can be found on the EFLHD MAP-21
website at http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/federal-lands-access.aspx. If you have any
questions, please contact Mr. David Payne at 571-434-1543 or David.Payne@dot.gov, or myself
at 703-404-6276 or Karen.Schmidt@dot.gov.

Sincerely yours,

SO eee

Karen A. Schmidt
Director, Office of Program Administration

Gs

Mr. John Strutner, County Administrator, Alleghany County, Virginia

Ms. Ciara Williams, Special Federal Programs Manager, Virginia Department of Transportation,
Richmond, VA

Ms. Irene Rico, Division Administrator, Virginia Federal Aid Division Office, Richmond, VA
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1997

MARGARITA DEL CARMEN TORRES-MEJIA; G.Y.R.T,

 Petitioners,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: March 24, 2020 Decided: April 15, 2020

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David C. Drake, DRAKE IMMIGRATION LAW, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director, 

Lindsay Corliss, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Margarita Del Carmen Torres-Mejia and her minor child, natives and citizens of El 

Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) 

dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying Torres-Mejia’s 

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention 

Against Torture. We have considered Torres-Mejia’s claims after thoroughly reviewing

the record and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any 

of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2018), and that substantial 

evidence supports the Board’s decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 

(1992). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

See In re Torres-Mejia (B.I.A. Aug. 15, 2019). We deny the motion for summary 

disposition as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590

 

September 24, 2008 

In Reply Refer To: HSSD/WZ-275 

Mr. Chris Goode 

Vice President Sales 

Bone Safety Signs 

2151 Northwest Parkway, SE 

Suite 100 

Marietta, GA 30067-8726 

Dear Mr. Goode: 

In your letter of August 18, 2008, received September 2, 2008, you requested the Federal 

Highway Administration (FHWA) acceptance of the SZ-460-2S and the SZ-484-2S temporary 

sign stands with the following sign substrate materials: 0.08 inch thick aluminum, 

3 mm and 4 mm aluminum composite, fiberglass supported roll-up signs, 6.35 mm solid 

ABS plastic, 10 mm and 16 mm corrugated plastic, and sign sizes up to the tested limit of 

48 inches by 48 inches as crashworthy traffic control devices for use in work zones on the 

National Highway System (NHS). You requested acceptance of a 48 inch by 48 inch diamond 

installation and a 48 inch by 60 inch rectangular installation. Accompanying your letter was the 

FHWA Office of Safety Design form that included a drawing and a detailed description of the 

barricade, a test report, and videos of the crash test. The drawing is enclosed with the acceptance 

form for the Type I barricade. You requested that we find this device acceptable for use on the 

NHS under the provisions of National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 350 

"Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features”. 

This letter acknowledges FHWA's acceptance of your requests. The original completed forms 

have been modified by the addition of the FHWA acceptance letter number and the date of our 

review. The form will be posted on our Web site in the near future. 

Sincerely yours, 

David A. Nicol, P.E. 

Director, Office of Safety Design 

Office of Safety 

Enclosures
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION
OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





I,
David Koos, Chief Financial Officer of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc.
(“Registrant”) certify that:





1. I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Registrant.





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. 
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and
have:


(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. 
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:   February
      8, 2010
            By:
            /s/ David
      R. KoosDavid
      R. KoosActing
      Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3448 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3448

  To reauthorize the Director of the United States Holocaust Memorial 
Museum to support Holocaust education programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2023

Ms. Rosen (for herself, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. 
    Cardin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize the Director of the United States Holocaust Memorial 
Museum to support Holocaust education programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Never Again Education 
Reauthorization Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 4(a) of the Never Again Education Act (Public Law 116-141; 
134 Stat. 638) is amended by striking ``each of the 4 succeeding fiscal 
years'' and inserting ``each succeeding fiscal year through fiscal year 
2030''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58975-58976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Center for Substance Abuse Prevention; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Drug Testing Advisory Board of the Center for Substance Abuse 
Prevention in December 1997.
    The first day (December 8) of the Drug Testing Advisory Board 
meeting will be open and will include a roll call, general 
announcements, and a discussion of various program, procedural, and 
technical issues. The preliminary agenda for the open session includes, 
but is not limited to, the following topics: a brief review of the DTAB 
Scientific Meetings on Alternative Specimens and Technologies held on 
April 28-30 and September 9-10, an update on the Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission fitness-for-duty program, an update on the Department of 
Transportation workplace drug and alcohol testing programs, 
adulteration/dilution testing, and hemp products. Public comments are 
welcome during the open session. If anyone needs special accommodations 
for persons with disabilities please notify the Contact listed below.
    The second day (December 9) of the DTAB meeting involves the review 
of sensitive National Laboratory Certification Program (NLCP) internal 
operating procedures and program development issues. Therefore, the 
second day of the meeting will be closed to the public as determined by 
the Administrator, SAMHSA, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2), 
(4), and (6) and 5 U.S.C. App. 2, Sec. 10(d).
    An agenda for this meeting and a roster of board members may be 
obtained from: Ms. Giselle Hersh,

[[Page 58976]]

Division of Workplace Programs, Room 13A-54, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: (301) 443-6014.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the contact 
whose name and telephone number is listed below.

    Committee Name: Drug Testing Advisory Board.
    Meeting Date: December 8-9, 1997.
    Place: DoubleTree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland 20857.
    Open: December 8, 1997, 8:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
    Closed: December 9, 1997, 8:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
    Contact: Donna M. Bush, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, Telephone: 
(301) 443-6014 and FAX: (301) 443-3031.

    Dated: October 21, 1997.
Dee Herman,
Acting Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-28832 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P