alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-718 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Research and Development 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and NORWAY 

Signed at Washington and Oslo 

July 8 and 18, 2011 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
NORWAY 

Defense: Research and Development 

 Agreement signed at Washington and Oslo 

 July 8 and 18, 2011; 

 Entered into force July 18, 2011. 

 With annexes. 

NOTE: It is noted that the actual page numbers of this Agreement, with the exception of the Annexes, are out of sequence.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-5970 |
|------------------------------------|----------|

 

Cash Account Trust

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 04/30 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 04/30/09 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**
# L_2005333EN.01003401.xml

| 20.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/34

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2086/2005

of 19 December 2005

determining the extent to which applications lodged in December 2005 for import licences for certain poultrymeat products under the regime provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat and certain other agricultural products can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 of 22 June 1994, laying down detailed rules for the application in the poultrymeat sector of the import arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat and certain other agricultural products (1) and in particular Article 4(4) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged for the period from 1 January to 31 March 2006 are, in the case of certain products, for quantities less than or equal to the quantities available and can therefore be met in full, but in the case of other products the said applications are for quantities greater than the quantities available and must therefore be reduced by a fixed percentage to ensure a fair distribution,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 January to 31 March 2006 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

2.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 April to 30 June 2006 may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 for the total quantity as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 156, 23.6.1994, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1043/2001 (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 24).

1

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Percentage of acceptance of import certificates submitted for the period 1 January to 31 March 2006 | Total quantity available for the period 1 April to 30 June 2006
  (t) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 1,261034 | 1 775,00 |
| 2 | — | 2 550,00 |
| 3 | 1,302083 | 825,00 |
| 4 | 1,620745 | 450,00 |
| 5 | 2,044989 | 175,00 |

Group No

Percentage of acceptance of import certificates submitted for the period 1 January to 31 March 2006

Total quantity available for the period 1 April to 30 June 2006

(t)

1

1,261034

1 775,00

2

—

2 550,00

3

1,302083

825,00

4

1,620745

450,00

5

2,044989

175,00

---
# Tribal Projects

- U.S. Department of Transportation Announces Availability of $70 Million for Nationally Significant Federal Lands and Tribal Projects Grants U.S. Department of Transportation Announces Availability of $70 Million for Nationally Significant Federal Lands and Tribal Projects Grantsneil_gaffneyTue, 09/08/2020 - 14:12            FHWA 19-20Contact: Doug HecoxTel.: (202) 366-0660WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) today published a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for cities and states, Tribal governments and Federal lands agencies to compete for $70 million in Nationally Significant Federal Lands and Tribal Projects (NSFLTP) grants. These will be the second grants awarded under the program, and will help to construct and repair roads and bridges serving Tribal or Federal lands.“By enhancing key rural routes, this program is one tool of many that will help to restore the economic vitality of rural America,” said Federal Highway Administrator Nicole R. Nason.The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act established the NSFLTP Program to provide Federal funding for the construction, reconstruction or rehabilitation of transportation projects providing access to or located on Federal or Tribal lands. In 2018, the first NOFO for the NSFLTP grant program generated 39 applications, with estimated construction costs approaching $2 billion. Ultimately, $321.4 million was awarded to six projects.“In a time of limited budgets, these grants are a critical resource for Tribal governments and Federal land management agencies needing to build or repair highways and bridges,” said Nason.Under the NSFLTP Program, the Federal share of a project can be up to 90 percent and can be used to improve the condition of a critical transportation facility. Large-scale projects with estimated construction costs of $50 million or more are given priority consideration for selection, but the program accepts projects with estimated construction costs of at least $25 million.To better address the needs of rural America, which has historically been neglected, FHWA will consider projects located in rural areas that deliver positive benefits for these communities, consistent with the Department’s Rural Opportunities to Use Transportation for Economic Success (ROUTES) initiative. More information for rural applicants can be found here.The NOFO application period will remain open through November 2, 2020. More information is available at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/view-opportunity.html?oppId=328898.# # #                                          0            Select Supplemental Content Alignment for the Image using the choices below:              Right-aligned                Placement              Off                            Effective Date              Tue, 09/08/2020 - 12:00                Contact Info              FHWA Office of Public Affairs                How to set Effective Date              Use specific date to backdate article                Placement              Off
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FERNANDO JAVIER COREASSEGOVIA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 20-70554 

Agency No. A208-446-069 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 22, 2022**

Pasadena, California

Before: WALLACE and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,*** District 

Judge.

Petitioner Fernando Javier Coreas-Segovia, a native and citizen of El 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the 

Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

FILED

DEC 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order 

denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 

U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 

983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), we deny the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Coreas-Segovia’s motion to 

reopen as untimely because it was filed more than a year after the agency’s final 

order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Coreas-Segovia failed to demonstrate 

changed circumstances in El Salvador to qualify for the exception to the time 

limitation for motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). A petitioner 

moving to reopen based on changed country conditions must submit evidence 

showing that conditions are “qualitatively different” than they were at the time of 

his original hearing. Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-90. Coreas-Segovia’s new 

evidence did not demonstrate a statistically significant increase in the homicide 

rate; much of his evidence reflected continuing problems rather than new or 

worsening conditions that arose after his 2017 hearing; and his concerns about the 

effects of the Trump administration’s terminating aid to El Salvador had not yet 

been borne out. Substantial evidence therefore supports the BIA’s conclusion that 

the evidence accompanying Coreas-Segovia’s motion was not significantly 

different from that available at the time of his hearing. See id. at 991.

Because failure to demonstrate a relevant change in country conditions was a 
3 

sufficient ground on which the BIA could deny the motion to reopen, we need not 

address Coreas-Segovia’s prima facie eligibility for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. See Rodriguez v. 

Garland, 990 F.3d 1205, 1211 (9th Cir. 2021). 

PETITION DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>              THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
                      EXTRACTED  FROM  THE  COASTAL   CORPORATION  FORM  10-Q
                      QUARTERLY  REPORT FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,
                      1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                      SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              64
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,024
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,794
<PP&E>                                          10,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,719
<BONDS>                                          3,792
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,461
<SALES>                                          8,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,882
<CGS>                                            6,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    43
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    262
<INCOME-TAX>                                        55
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                207
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (12)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

January 3, 2012



### Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 10

‐ 3271

DANIEL VIRNICH,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant

,

v.

JEFFREY VORWALD, et al.

, Defendants

‐ Appellees

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Western District of

Wisconsin.

No. 3:09

‐ cv

‐ 00340

Barbara B. Crabb,

Judge

.



### O R D E R

The court’s opinion of December 20, 2011, is hereby amended as follows:

On page 18, footnote 4 is amended by striking the indicated language:

“ 4 This rule is consistent with federal law and the state law of Illinois and Indiana. See

Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway & Park District

, 557 F.2d 580, 595 (7th Cir. 1977) (federal and

Illinois law), vacated on other grounds

, 435 U.S. 992 (1978); Starzenski v. City of Elkhart

,

87 F.3d 872, 878 (7th Cir. 1996) (Indiana law); see also Erebia v. Chrysler Plastic Products

Corp.

, 891 F.2d 1212, 1215 n. 1 (6th Cir. 1989) (“the established rule in the federal courts

is that a final judgment retains all of its preclusive effect pending appeal”); Robi v. Five

Platters, Inc.

, 838 F.2d 318, 327 (9th Cir. 1988) (same for issue preclusion).”

‐ over ‐No. 10

‐ 3271 2

The corrected footnote 4 shall read:

“ 4 This rule is consistent with federal law and the state law of Indiana. See Kurek v.

Pleasure Driveway & Park District

, 557 F.2d 580, 595 (7th Cir. 1977) (federal law), vacated

on other grounds

, 435 U.S. 992 (1978); Starzenski v. City of Elkhart

, 87 F.3d 872, 878 (7th Cir.

1996) (Indiana law); see also Erebia v. Chrysler Plastic Products Corp.

, 891 F.2d 1212, 1215

n. 1 (6th Cir. 1989) (“the established rule in the federal courts is that a final judgment

retains all of its preclusive effect pending appeal”); Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.

, 838 F.2d

318, 327 (9th Cir. 1988) (same for issue preclusion).”
# EUR-Lex - 32005M3678 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005M3678

**Commission Decision of 23/03/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3678 - GOLDMAN SACHS / CERBERUS / TET) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

| |Brussels, 23/03/2005

SG-Greffe(2005) D/201482

To the notifying parties

Dear Madam, Dear Sir,

Subject : Case No. COMP/M.3678 – Goldman Sachs / Cerberus / TET / JV Notification of 24/02/2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C56, 05/03/2005, p.45

1. On 24/02/2005 , the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which the undertakings Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company (“GSMC”, USA) controlled by Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (“Goldman Sachs”, USA) and The Cerberus Group (“Cerberus”, USA) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of part of the undertaking Transamerica European Trailers (“TET”, UK) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are :

- for Goldman Sachs : investment banking and securities.

- for Cerberus : investment in personal property.

- for TET : leasing of commercial road trailers

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph b, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004[2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

Signed Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] Available on DG COMP website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
Exhibit 23.1




Consent of Independent Accountants



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
MRS Technology, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos.  33-79476, 33-85148, 33-85262) of
our report dated May 23, 1997 on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of MRS Technology, Inc. as of March 31, 1997 and 1996, and for each
of the three years in the period ended March 31, 1997, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Boston, Massachusetts
June 13, 1997
# L_2005276EN.01003001.xml

| 21.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 276/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 276/30

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1729/2005

of 20 October 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 14 to 20 October 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                         CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT


I, Robert W. Duggan, Chief Executive Officer of Computer Motion, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d));
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 29, 2003                          COMPUTER MOTION, INC.


                                            By: /s/ Robert W. Duggan
                                            Robert W. Duggan
                                            Chairman of the Board of Directors
                                            and Chief Executive Officer