alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains consolidated financial information extracted from Sound
Source Interactive, Inc and subsidiary for the period July 1, 1997 through June
30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         693,741
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,405,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (22,540)
<INVENTORY>                                    417,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,549,980
<PP&E>                                         709,623
<DEPRECIATION>                               (300,494)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,974,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,866,234
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,560
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,102,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,974,812
<SALES>                                      8,819,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,867,490
<CGS>                                        3,574,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,788,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,022,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                502,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            501,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   501,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
#### A. H. SAKOLSKY v. CITY OF CORAL GABLES.

No. 38132.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. So.2d 329. 215
EXHIBIT 10.4


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                                 1990 STOCK PLAN

         The undersigned, Secretary of Insignia Systems, Inc., hereby certifies
that the following resolution was adopted by the Board of Directors on January
27, 2003, and remains in full force and effect:

                  RESOLVED, that for the purpose of allowing all holders of the
         Company's stock options to pay the exercise price with previously-owned
         shares, Section 5(d) of the 1990 Stock Option Plan entitled "Stock
         Options - Method of Exercise" is hereby amended as follows (with the
         new language in italics):

                  (d) Method of Exercise. Stock Options may be exercised in
         whole or in part at any time during the option period by giving written
         notice of exercise to the Company specifying the number of shares to be
         purchased. Such notice shall be accompanied by payment in full of the
         purchase price, either by certified or bank check, or by any other form
         of legal consideration deemed sufficient by the Committee and
         consistent with the Plan's purpose and applicable law, including
         promissory notes or a properly executed exercise notice together with
         irrevocable instructions to a broker acceptable to the Company to
         promptly deliver to the Company the amount of sale or loan proceeds to
         pay the exercise price. PAYMENT IN FULL OR IN PART FOR THE EXERCISE OF
         A STOCK OPTION MAY ALSO BE MADE IN THE FORM OF UNRESTRICTED STOCK
         ALREADY OWNED BY THE OPTIONEE (BASED ON THE MARKET PRICE OF THE STOCK
         ON THE DATE THE OPTION IS EXERCISED). If the terms of an option so
         permit, an optionee may elect to pay all or part of the option exercise
         price by having the Company withhold from the shares of Stock that
         would otherwise be issued upon exercise that number of shares of Stock
         having a Fair Market Value equal to the aggregate option exercise price
         for the shares with respect to which such election is made. No shares
         of Stock shall be issued until full payment therefor has been made. An
         optionee shall generally have the rights to dividends and other rights
         of a shareholder with respect to shares subject to the option when the
         optionee has given written notice of exercise, has paid in full for
         such shares, and, if requested, has given the representation described
         in paragraph (a) of Section 10.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 4th
day of March, 2003.


                                            /s/ John R. Whisnant
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John R. Whisnant, Secretary
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of dot com Entertainment Group, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David Callander, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the bestof my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,                                    |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |

/s/ David Callander

David CallanderChief Financial OfficerNovember 7, 2002
EXHIBIT 23.1c



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
Nos. 333-19237, 333-37645, 333-75937 and 333-83797 of Bank United Corp. on Form
S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-42765 of Bank United Corp. on Form S-8, and
Registration Statement No. 333-47308 of Washington Mutual of our report dated
February 9, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bank United
Corp. for the year ended September 30, 2000.



PAYNE FALKNER SMITH & JONES, P.C.

Dallas, Texas
December 14, 2000
Report Date Institution Name City State

7/31/2018 Broadway Financial Corporation Los Angeles CA

7/31/2018 OneFinancial Corporation (One Bank & Trust, National Association) Little Rock AR

Total Number of Institutions: 2

The following institutions did not submit a July 2018 CPP Monthly Lending Report by the August 31, 2018 deadline:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,306

EX PARTE DANIEL PATRICK HOWARD, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F-0155310-I IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder

and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Howard

v. State, No. 05-02-01731-CR (Tex. App.–Dallas 2003, no pet.).

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court made findings

of fact and concluded that through no fault of appellate counsel Applicant was denied his right to file
2

a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. We find,

therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary

review of the judgment of the Fifth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 05-02-01731-CR that affirmed

his conviction in Case No. F-0155310-I from Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County.

Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Fifth Court of Appeals within 30

days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. Applicant’s other claims are dismissed. Ex

parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Delivered: March 3, 2010

Do not publish
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

OCEAN RIDGE CHIROPRACTIC, INC. a/a/o ALICIA VELAZQUEZ , Appellant,

v.

ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY , Appellee.

No. 4D 21

- 33 5

[ July 29, 2021 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fif teenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Reginald Roy Corlew , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 50

- 2013

- SC

006852

- XXXX

- SB and 50

- 2019

- AP

- 000177

- CAXX

- MB

.
Scott James Edwards of Scott J. Edwards, P.A., Boca Raton, and Michelle J. Kane and Thomas E. Flanagan, III of Kane Lawyers, PLLC, Delray Beach, for appellant.

Daniel E. Nordby of Shutts & Bowen LLP, Tallahassee, and Alyssa L. Cory of Shutts & Bowen LLP, Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C ONNER , C.J., W ARNER and G ROSS , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
LETTER AGREEMENT



 
EXHIBIT 10(j)

 
[On Letterhead of Marathon Oil Company]

 
Mr. Thomas J. Usher 
United States Steel Corporation 
600 Grant
Street 
Pittsburgh, PA 15219-2800 
 
December 6, 2002 
 
Dear Tom, 
 
On
behalf of the Compensation and Organization Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Marathon Oil Corporation (the “Corporation”), I have been authorized to extend to you this Agreement (“Agreement”)
concerning the 138,000 restricted shares of the Corporation’s common stock held by you under the Marathon Oil Corporation 1990 Stock Plan (the “1990 Stock Plan”). 
 
In exchange for your relinquishment and complete resolution of all present and future right, title, and interest in and to
any and all shares of the Corporation’s restricted stock under the 1990 Stock Plan, including without limitation the 138,000 restricted shares currently held by you under the 1990 Stock Plan, the Corporation will pay to you a lump sum cash
payment equal to the product of: 
 
Market Price Per
Share x 138,000 x 1.3 
 
For purposes of the above calculation, the
“market price per share” shall be the amount representing the five (5) day average of the mean between the daily high and low trading prices of the Corporation’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on each of the five (5)
trading days during the week of December 8, 2002. The 1.3 multiplier represents a vesting assumption of 130% for the remaining performance periods of the original five (5) year grant cycle relating to the restricted stock, based on past performance
and future projected performance of the Corporation as measured under the 1990 Stock Plan. 
 
By signing this Agreement, you are consenting to the relinquishment and complete resolution of all interests in restricted stock under the 1990 Stock Plan as described above in exchange for the
consideration set forth herein. 
 
In association with this
Agreement, you may elect the rate at which Federal Income Tax (“FIT”) will be withheld from the lump sum cash payment described above. Normally, a 27% tax rate is used for FIT withholding for supplemental wage payments not included as part
of your regular monthly wages. However, you may elect to have FIT withheld from the payment at a higher rate (up to 39%) if you so desire. Please complete the attached tax withholding election form to indicate your FIT withholding preference.

 









 
December 6, 2002

 
In order for this Agreement to be valid, please execute the
Agreement and the tax withholding election form upon receipt, fax a copy of each to my attention at (713) 296-4375, and then place the signed originals in the mail to me at the address indicated above. 
 

	 	 	 	 	 Sincerely,
  
 /s/ EILEEN M. CAMPBELL
  
 Eileen M. Campbell


 
 
Agreed and Accepted this 6th day of December, 2002. 
 
/S/ THOMAS J. USHER 

[Name] Thomas J. Usher 
 
 
 

2
#### OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Appellant, v. Dorothy G. HARRELL and Dorothy G. Harrell, as mother and natural guardian of Michael Wayne Harrell, a minor, Appellees.

No. 73-691.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 26, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Russell E. Seay, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33, 446; TA-W-33, 447; TA-W-33, 448; TA-W-33, 449]


Quarles Drilling Corporation Headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma and 
Quarles Drilling Corporation Operating at Various Locations in the 
Following States: Oklahoma (Except Tulsa); Texas; Louisiana; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on June 
12, 1997, applicable to workers of Quarles Drilling Corporation, 
headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Houston, 
Texas and Houma, Louisiana. The notice will soon be published in the 
Federal Register.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm location in Houston, 
Texas. All workers at Quarles Drilling Corporation are engaged in 
employment related to the production of crude oil and natural gas. 
Findings on review show that the Department inadvertently limited the 
certification to workers at the subject firm locations in Tulsa and 
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Houston, Texas, and Houma, Louisiana. It was 
the intent of the Department's certification to include all workers of 
Quarles Drilling at various locations within the States of Oklahoma, 
Texas and Louisiana. Accordingly, the Department is amending the worker 
certification to reflect this matter.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33, 446 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Quarles Drilling Corporation, headquartered in 
Tulsa, Oklahoma (TA-W-33, 446), and operating at various locations 
in the following States: Oklahoma, except Tulsa, (TA-W-33, 447), 
Texas (TA-W-33, 448), and Louisiana (TA-W-33, 449) engaged in 
employment related to the production of crude oil and natural gas, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after April 15, 1996, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 27th day of October 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-29215 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Copyright © 1997 Global Compliance, LLC. A LL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

## Basics Case No: 12-008-U - Flint Creek Retrofit Date Entered: 06/18/2012 01:07:47 PM Party/Requestor: Sierra Club, Jeff Speir Date Received: 06/15/2012 Date Requested: 06/15/2012 Internal Due Date: 06/28/2012 Service Due Date: 07/02/2012 Answer Status: New Service Date: 

## Question No: 5-231 The Company estimates costs for installation of a DFGD via “indicative pricing conversion” based on the Conesville 4 wet scrubber with an in-service date of 2009. (“Flint Creek $/kW Indicative Pricing Conversion” provided in Response to Sierra Club Data Request #30.d, Sierra Club 1-030 Attachment 1.) Are costs for the selective catalytic reduction (“SCR”) of $193/kW in 2011 dollars based on a similar conversion? If yes, p lease provide supporting calculations in Excel spreadsheets. If no, p lease explain how cost estimates for SCR were derived. Answer: The costs for the SCR are not based on a similar conversion. The SCR cost estimates were developed using the Company's experience in managing SCR retrofit projects. Advanced Date Verified: Date Accepted: Confidential: No Yes Attachments:

Voluminous: No Yes Highly Sensitive: No Yes
Comments:

Preparer(s): Henry C Steele; Kevin J Munson; Twana Banks-Smith; William E Mast Witness: Christian T Beam

Modification History Created by Aaron Walker Created on 06/25/2012 09:44:50 AM Modified on 06/25/2012 02:15:05 PM Edit History 0. Aaron Walker 06/25/2012 02:15:05 PMCopyright © 1997 Global Compliance, LLC. A LL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0631 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-SW-021-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT (this "Amendment"), dated as of the 7th day of March, 2011, amends that Rights Agreement (the "Rights Agreement"), dated as of April 4, 2007, between FX ENERGY, INC., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), and FIDELITY TRANSFER COMPANY, a Utah corporation authorized to conduct business in the state of Utah (the "Rights Agent").




Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Rights Agreement.




RECITALS:




WHEREAS, Section 6.3 of the Rights Agreement provides that the Board of Directors of the Company may supplement or amend the Rights Agreement from time to time without the approval of the holders of Rights to make any changes, except for a supplement or amendment that would change the Expiration Date or the Exercise Price, that the Board of Directors acting in good faith may deem necessary or desirable or to cure any ambiguity or to correct or supplement any provision contained in the Rights Agreement that may be inconsistent with any other provision of the Rights Agreement or otherwise defective; and




WHEREAS, Section 6.18 of the Rights Agreement provides that the Board of Directors of the Company shall have the exclusive power and authority to amend the Rights Agreement and that such actions such be final, conclusive, and binding on the Company, the Rights Agent, the holders of the Rights Certificates and all other parties; and




WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company approved this Amendment on March 4, 2011;




NOW, THEREFORE, the following amendment to the Rights Agreement is hereby adopted, to be effective as of date first above written:




1.  The Rights Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the text of Section 2.2(g)(i) in its entirety and replacing it with "[Reserved]."




2. The Rights Agreement is also hereby amended by deleting the parenthetical in Section 3.1(a)(iv), “(including the reservation of a sufficient number of its Common Shares, in the same manner applicable to the reservation of Preferred Shares provided by Subsection 2.2(g)(i) hereof).”


3.  Except as specifically amended herein, the Rights Agreement remains in full force and effect.  This Amendment and the Rights Agreement, as amended, shall be one and the same instrument and may be amended and restated in one instrument.




4.  This Amendment shall be deemed to be a contract made under the internal laws of the state of Nevada and for all purposes shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws, including the corporate laws, of such state applicable to contracts to be made and performed entirely within such state without giving effect to conflicts of laws principles thereof.




*     *     *     *     *




HOUSTON\2466351







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.




FX ENERGY, INC.By:
/s/ David N. PierceDavid N. PiercePresident and Chief Executive OfficerFIDELITY TRANSFER COMPANYBy:
/s/ Kevin J. KopaunikKevin J. KopaunikPresident







[Signature Page to Amendment to Rights Agreement]