alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4R Reconstruction-Relocation Bridge Rehabilitation Facilities for Pedestrians & Bicycles Bridge Replacement

$2.3M

$0.8M

$0.6M $0.6M

FLAP Obligations/Expenditures by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$58,237 $1,385,134 $773,005 $460,933 $1,824,382 $1,126,238 $5,627,929

FLAP Loan/Credits by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

($381,822) $0 $0 ($322,000) $1,350,000 $600,000 $1,246,178

Programming Decisions Committee Members

Name Phone   E-mail Title

Norm Bowers 785-272-2585 e... bowers@kansascounties.org Local Road Engineer, Kansas Associati...

Tod Salfrank 785-296-7396 salfrank@ksdot.org Assistant Chief, Bureau of Local Projects

Chris Longley 720-963-3733 christopher.longley@dot.gov Access Program Manager

Call for Projects information

Start Date End Date

No. applications

received

Total Access funds

requested

5/1/2013 7/1/2013 14 $2,699,555

5/1/2014 7/31/2014 13 $6,979,000

5/1/2018 7/30/2018 12 $8,769,035

Local Match

20.00%

Congressional District

KS-02

KS-01

KS-04

$2.4M

$1.3M

$0.6M

Total project's costs by FLMA Accessed

USACE 68%

FWS 22%

BOR 10%

Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP)

Kansas

Projects Programmed

8

FLAP Funds Programmed

$4.2M

Federal Lands Highway Division

CFLHD

FLAP Allocations by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$812,330 $818,432 $802,023 $525,868 $525,771 $748,604 $4,233,028

$18M
*This information is an overview of the FLAP projects information. It is subject to change at any time. For additional details or clarifications, please contact the Federal Lands Highway Division offices or visit the State FLAP 

webpage. 

Project ID Project Name- Description Improvement type Delivery Agency Delivery 

Year

KS FLAP RS 47(1) BUNKER HILL BRIDGE REPAIR Bridge Rehabilitation Central Federal Lands Highway Division, FHWA 2020

KS FLAP RS 376(1) 19000 ROAD 3R 4R Reconstruction-Relocation Central Federal Lands Highway Division, FHWA 2018

KS FLAP RSR 236(1) CAWKER CITY CAUSEWAY 4R Reconstruction-Relocation Central Federal Lands Highway Division, FHWA 2018

KS FLAP CR1200(1) PLEASANTON EAST LAKE BRIDGE Bridge Replacement Central Federal Lands Highway Division, FHWA 2016

KS FLAP T1000(1) CHISHOLM CREEK PARK SOUTH PATHWAY Facilities for Pedestrians & Bicycles Central Federal Lands Highway Division, FHWA 2014

KS FLAP CR110(1)CRW(1)CRX(1) CULVERT REPLACEMENTS Bridge Replacement Central Federal Lands Highway Division, FHWA 2014

KS FLAP LR44(1) MINE CREEK BRIDGE STABILIZATION Bridge Rehabilitation Central Federal Lands Highway Division, FHWA 2014

KS FLAP CR458(1) NORTH 1200 ROAD WIDENING 4R Reconstruction-Relocation Douglas County 2014
© 2018 HERE, © 2019 Microsoft Corporation

Project ID

KS FLAP CR1200(1)

KS FLAP RS 376(1)

KS FLAP RS 47(1)

KS FLAP RSR 236(1)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 29, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 56051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28620]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Chapter I

RIN 3150-AF69


Information Collection Requirements; Statutory and Technical 
Amendments; Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice appearing in the Federal 
Register on October 6, 1997 (62 FR 52184). This action is necessary to 
correct an erroneous instruction.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 6, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David L. Meyer, Chief, Rules and 
Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of 
Administration, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-7162.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page 52188, in the second column, 
instruction number 24 is corrected to read, ``24. In Sec. 60.8, 
paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:''.

    Dated at Rockville, MD, this 22nd day of October 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David L. Meyer,
Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative 
Services, Office of Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-28620 Filed 10-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<LEGEND>               THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                       EXTRACTED FROM THE COASTAL CORPORATION FORM 10-Q
                       QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
                       AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                       FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>           1,000,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          59
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                    810
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,685
<PP&E>                                      13,802
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,779
<BONDS>                                      5,129
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                        73
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,366
<SALES>                                      2,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,959
<CGS>                                        2,004
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              90
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                248
<INCOME-TAX>                                    74
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            174
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   174
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .80


</TABLE>
Employment Agreement between the Company and Thomas B. Barker



Exhibit 10.04 
 
[WEST LOGO TO APPEAR HERE] 
 

	 To:
	 	 Thomas B. Barker
	 	 
	 From:
	 	 WSTC Comp. Committee
	 	 
	 Date:
	 	 February 10, 2003
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 Re:
	 	 2003 Compensation Plan
	 	 


Your 2003 compensation plan for your employment as
President and Chief Executive Officer for West Corporation (the “Company”) is as follows: 
 

	1.	 	Your base salary will be $475,000. Should you elect to voluntarily terminate your employment, you will be compensated for your services through the date of your
actual termination per your Employment Agreement. 

 

	2.	 	Effective January 1, 2003, you will be eligible to receive a performance bonus based on year-to-date growth of profits over the same period of the prior year. This
bonus will be calculated by multiplying the year-to-date growth in profits for each quarter by the corresponding profit growth participation factor from the table below, minus bonus paid year-to-date for the respective calendar year.


 

	 Profit Growth

	  	 Profit Growth Participation Factor


	 0%–9.99%
	  	      0

	 10.1%–14.99%
	  	 .025

	 15%–20%
	  	 .03  

	 20%+
	  	 .035


 
Please
note that a negative year-to-date profit calculations at the end of any given quarter will result in “loss carry forward” to be applied to the next quarterly year-to-date calculation. All bonuses will be paid within thirty (30) days of the
end of the quarter. 
 

	3.	 	For the purposes of this compensation plan, profit shall be defined as pre-tax profit growth of the Company on a consolidated basis. 

 

	4.	 	All pre-tax, pre-corporate allocation profit and net income objectives are based upon the Company’s operations and will not include profit and income derived
from mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures or other non-operating income unless specifically and individually included upon completion of the transaction. 

 

	5.	 	At the discretion of management, you may receive an additional bonus based on the Company’s and your individual performance. 

 

	6.	 	The benefit plans, as referenced in Section 7(i), shall include insurance plans based upon eligibility pursuant to the plans. If the insurance plans do not provide
for continued participation, the continuation of benefits shall be pursuant to COBRA. In the event Employee’s benefits continue pursuant to COBRA and Employee accepts new employment during the consulting term, Employee may continue benefits
thereafter to the extent allowed under COBRA. In no event shall benefits plans include the 401K Plan or the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan. 

 

	 
	
	 By:
	 	 /s/    THOMAS B.
BARKER        


	 	 	 Employee—Thomas B. Barker
Exhibit 4.2

 



COMMON STOCK   THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the (SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEF1NmONS) owner of   Shares of the Common Stock of fully paid and non-assessable, transferable   only on the books ofthe Corporation in person or by Attorney upon surrender   of this Certificate properly endorsed IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said   Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed byits duly authorized   oDicers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto aflixed this dayof. DD MM AD   YYYY. RITE AID CORPORATION **MR. SAMPLE & MRS. SAMPLE** ** 000000 Shares   ** ZQ00000000 ** 000000 ** 


    




 









 



This   certificate also evidences and entitles the holder hereof to certain Rights   as set forth in the Tax Benefits Preservation Plan between Rite Aid   Corporation (the “Company”) and the Rights Agent (including any successor   Rights Agent) thereunder (as originally executed and as it may be amended or   restated from time to time, the “Tax Benefits Preservation Plan”), the terms   of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference and a copy of which is   on file at the principal offices of the Company. Under certain circumstances,   as set forth in the Tax Benefits Preservation Plan, Rights will be evidenced   by separate certificates and will no longer be evidenced by this certificate.   The Company will mail to the holder of this certificate a copy of the Tax   Benefits Preservation Plan, as in effect on the date of mailing, without   charge, promptly after receipt of a written request therefor. Under certain   circumstances set forth in the Tax Benefits Preservation Plan, Rights issued   to, or held by, any Person that is, was or becomes an Acquiring Person or any   Affiliate or Associate thereof (as such terms are defined in the Tax Benefits   Preservation Plan), whether currently held by or on behalf of such Person or   by any subsequent holder, may become null and void. The following   abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate   shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to   applicable laws or regulations TEN COM - as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN   ACT- Custodian under TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor) IT   TEN - as Joint tenants with right of survivorship Uniform Gifts to Minors Act   and not as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be   used though not in the above list. For Value Received,   hereby sell, assign and transfer unto   PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY ON OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE Shares   represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute   and appoint Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within   named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated In   presence of NOTICE THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE   NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE. IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT   ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
# L_2005340EN.01005801.xml

| 23.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 340/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 340/58

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2138/2005

of 22 December 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005 of 2 September 2005 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden for the 2005/2006 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 16 to 22 December 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 December 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 22 December 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 228, 3.9.2005, p. 5.

3

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0368 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL OKEEFE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 2 4, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 15 2023

03/15/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0368
#### UNITED GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY v. Sidonia L. TSCHIRN et al.

No. 7757.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Nov. 17, 1969.

Risley C. Triche, of Triche & Sternfels, Napoleonville, for defendant-appellant.

Ray A. Barlow, of Hargrove, Guyton, Van Hook & Ramey, Shreveport, and Martin, Himel, Daly & Peytavin, New Orleans, *563and Blum Talbot, Sotile & Carmouche, Donaldsonville and Napoleonville, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before LOTTINGER, REID and BLANCHE, JJ.

BLANCHE, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in our opinion in United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Landry, 228 So.2d 565 the judgment of the trial court is amended to change the consideration to be paid to defendants by plaintiff from $7,446.09 to $6,198.09.

Judgment amended and as amended affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ronald NODINE.

No. 62435.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: Ronald Nodine applying for stay order pending preparation of application for supervisory and/or remedial writs. Parish of Jefferson.

Stay order granted: All proceedings in this matter stayed until Monday, June 12, 1978, 1:00 P. M. The district attorney is ordered to file a response.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28998]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1173-DR]


South Dakota; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of South Dakota, (FEMA-1173-DR), dated April 7, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 20, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter 
dated October 20, 1997 the President amended the cost sharing 
arrangements concerning Federal funds provided under the authority of 
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 51521 et seq.), in a letter to James L. Witt, Director of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State 
of South Dakota, resulting from severe flooding, severe winter 
storms, heavy spring rain, rapid snowmelt, high winds, and ice jams 
beginning on February 3, 1997, and continuing through May 24, 1997, 
is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant special cost 
sharing arrangements concerning Federal funds provided under the 
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 
(``the Stafford Act'').
    Therefore, I amend my previous declaration to authorize Federal 
funds for Public Assistance, Categories C through G, at 90 percent 
of total eligible costs, except for direct Federal assistance costs 
and debris removal and emergency protective measures (Categories A 
and B) under the Public Assistance program which were previously 
authorized at 100 percent Federal funding.
    This adjustment to State and local cost sharing applies only to 
Public Assistance costs (Categories C through G) eligible for such 
adjustment under the law. The law specifically prohibits a similar 
adjustment for funds provided to the State for the Individual and 
Family Grant program and Hazard Mitigation Assistance. These funds 
will continue to be reimbursed at 75 percent of total eligible 
costs.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-28998 Filed 10-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11208

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BRYSON DEONTAE BRIGHT,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:17-CR-567-8

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Bryson Deontae Bright has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Bright has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed 

to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Bright’s claims of ineffective assistance 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 10, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11208 Document: 00514989328 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/10/2019
No. 18-11208

2

of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Bright’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-11208 Document: 00514989328 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/10/2019
July 19, 2012 

Re: Capital Purchase Program – Bid Letter Extension 

On July 9, 2012, the United States Department of the Treasury (Treasury) sent you a letter and 

posted documents to our website setting forth additional information about the process for 

opting-out of the pooled auctions of the Capital Purchase Program (CPP) investments that 

Treasury intends to conduct starting in the Fall. In those materials, we stated that we would 

communicate with you regularly about that process and that Treasury reserved the right to update 

the procedures from time to time. 

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that Treasury is updating the procedures for opting-out 

of the pooled auction by allowing banks to request an extension of the date when bid letters are 

due to October 9, 2012, from August 6, 2012. If a bank wishes to obtain an extension, it may do 

so by submitting an extension request to cpp@treasury.gov by not later than August 6, 2012. 

Any institution that is prepared to submit a bid by August 6, 2012, may continue to do so and 

any bank that would prefer not to submit a bid and start the process of being included in an 

earlier pooled auction need not take any action. 

Since our original announcement regarding the pooled auctions and opt-out process, many 

institutions have informed Treasury of their significant efforts to raise capital, meetings with 

prospective designated bidders, and discussions with their primary federal regulator, all in an 

effort to either redeem their CPP securities in full or otherwise raise capital or identify investors 

that would submit a qualifying bid. Treasury encourages these efforts and, to that end, we 

determined that providing banks with an extension to October 9, 2012, supports those efforts and 

Treasury’s overall objective of winding down CPP in a manner that promotes financial stability 

and helps maximize taxpayer returns. 

As we have previously stated, we’ll continue to communicate with you regularly about the 

pooled auction process and provide additional information on the procedures moving forward. If 

you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at cpp@treasury.gov. 

Best regards, 

Michael Harris 

Director of the Capital Purchase Program
No. 9714.

#### The Sidney S. Wilson Co. *v.*The Cleveland Electric Railway Co.

(Decided November 13, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County:

*Mr. John Fd. Smart,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey*and *Messrs. Wood, Hitchcock & Morgan,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur. ■