alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28991]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)


Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration (SAMHSA) National Advisory Council in November 1997.
    The meeting will include the review, discussion and evaluation of 
individual contract proposals, as well as a presentation and discussion 
of information about the Agency's procurement plans. Therefore, a 
portion of the meeting will be closed to the public as determined by 
the Administrator, SAMHSA, in accordance with Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(3), (4), and (6) and 5 U.S.C. App. 2, Section 10(d).
    In addition, a portion of the SAMHSA National Advisory Council 
meeting will be open and include a presentation of certificates of 
appreciation to those members whose terms will end on November 30. 
Attendance by the public will be limited to space available. Public 
comments are welcome during the open session. Please communicate with 
the individual listed as contact below to make arrangements to comment 
or to request special accommodations for persons with disabilities.
    Substantive program information, summary of the meeting and a 
roster of Council members may also be obtained from the contact whose 
name and telephone number is listed below.

    Committee Name: SAMHSA National Advisory Council.
    Meeting Date: November 13, 1997.
    Place: Phoenix Park Hotel, 520 North Capitol Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20001.
    Closed: November 13, 1997, 1:00 p.m. to 4:20 p.m.
    Open: November 13, 1997, 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Contact: Toian Vaughn, Executive Secretary, Room 12C-15, 
Parklawn Building, Telephone: (301) 443-4640 and FAX: (301) 443-
1450.

    Dated: October 28, 1997.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-28991 Filed 10-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
EXHIBIT 21.1



List of Subsidiaries



The following table sets forth certain information concerning the principal subsidiaries of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated:



|                                        |  |                                            
|--------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Name                                    |  | State or OtherJurisdiction of Incorporation
|Sunrise Telecom Broadband, Inc.         |  | Georgia, U.S.A.                            
|Sunrise Telecom Pro.Tel Division S.r.l. |  | Italy                                      
|Sunrise Telecom Broadband Corporation   |  | Nova Scotia, Canada                        
|Taiwan Sunrise Telecom Company Limited  |  | Taiwan                                     



The names of certain
subsidiaries have been omitted because such unnamed subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate, would not constitute a significant subsidiary as that term is defined in Regulation S-X.
#### Arthur James MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-536.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 26, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court Criminal Justice Division, Orange County; W. Rogers Turner, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 99-1848.

#### Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc., et al. *v.*West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 530 U. S. 1304.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION








Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)







In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Zoom Telephonics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Frank B. Manning, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:






(1)   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
      March 31, 2010
              
              /s/ Frank
      B. ManningName:  Frank
      B. ManningTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer
# L_2005180EN.01000301.xml

| 12.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 180/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 180/3

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 991/2005 of 28 June 2005 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 168 of 30 June 2005
  )

On page 12, in the annex, in the third column of the last entry ‘2.30’, under the heading EUR:

for:

‘62,26’

read:

‘65,26’.

---
Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.
                                    One Beacon Street
                                    Boston, MA 02108

                                    February 3, 2009



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC  20549


RE:      DWS Strategic Income Fund (the "Fund" and the "Trust") (Reg. No.
         2-58921) (811-2743)


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Fund
hereby certifies that the form of Prospectuses and Statements of Additional
Information that would have been filed on behalf of the Fund pursuant to Rule
497(c) upon the effectiveness of Post-Effective Amendment No. 51 to the Fund's
Registration Statement on Form N-1A (the "Amendment"), do not differ from that
contained in the Amendment, which is the most recent Amendment to such
Registration Statement and was filed electronically on January 28, 2009.

Any comments or questions on this filing should be directed to the undersigned
at (617) 295-3357.

                                 Very truly yours,

                                 /s/Thomas H. Connors

                                 Thomas H. Connors, Esq.
                                 Director and Senior Counsel
                                 Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.


cc:      Jose Del Real, Esq., Vedder Price P.C.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bill Williams, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of MedCom USA, INC.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's corporate management and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is make known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
     the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's corporate management and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's board of directors:

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6.   The registrant's corporate management and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

MEDCOM USA, INC.

By /s/ W.P. Williams
   -----------------
Chairman, President, CEO
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.3

STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT between the COESEN INCORPORATED, a New Hampshire
corporation with offices at P.O. Box 275, Hudson NH 03051 (Coesen), Howard
Doane, Joseph Thoman and Alfred Covino (the Stockholders) dated March 5, 2003.

         The Corporation and the Stockholders agree that the prior written
consent of VNI, Joseph Thoman and Alfred Covino will be required in order to
authorize any of the following actions proposed by, on behalf of, or with regard
to, the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries for so long as VNI or an
affiliate or subsidiary of VNI owns any shares of Common Stock of the
Corporation:

         (i) Liquidation, dissolution, winding-up, recapitalization,
reorganization, spin-off, merger, consolidation or sale of the Corporation or
any of its subsidiaries;

         (ii) Authorization, creation, designation or issuance of any additional
equity or convertible debt securities of the Corporation or approval, adoption
or modification of any stock option, stock grant, stock appreciation, phantom
stock or other similar stock compensation or incentive plan or rights;

         (iii) Incurrence of indebtedness, whether in a single transaction or a
series of transactions, other than in the ordinary course of business, or the
grant, of a mortgage on, a lease of, a license to, a security interest in, or a
pledge or other encumbrance on, any material asset of the Corporation or any
subsidiary;

         (xi) Redemption or repurchase of shares of any class or series of
capital stock (except pursuant to written repurchase agreements between the
Corporation and its directors, officers or key employees) or other securities of
the Corporation or any subsidiary;

         Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the foregoing
protective provisions shall not apply to the distribution of net income
available for distribution to the Stockholders, made in the ordinary course;
provided, however that sufficient reserves shall have been made prior to any
such distribution for any liabilities of the Company then outstanding, as
determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Stockholders
Agreement as of the 5th day of March, 2003.


                                    /s/ Howard Doane
                                   -------------------------
                                   Howard Doane


                                    /s/ Joseph Thoman
                                   -------------------------
                                   Joseph Thoman


                                    /s/ Alfred Covino
                                   -------------------------
                                   Alfred Covino


COESEN INCORPORATED


                                   By: /s/ Joseph Thoman
                                   -------------------------
                                   Name: Joseph Thoman
                                   Title: Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2770]



[[Page 5486]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water 
Act

    Consistent with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, 38 FR 19029, 
notice is hereby given that on January 24, 1997, a proposed 
Supplemental Consent Decree in United States v. Puerto Rico 
Administration of Corrections, Civil Action No. 90-2119, was lodged 
with the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. 
The proposed Supplemental Consent Decree settles the United States' 
claims for stipulated penalties under a 1992 Consent Decree between the 
parties as well as the United States' claims under the Clean Water Act 
alleged in a Supplemental Complaint.
    Puursuant to the Supplemental Consent Decree, the Puerto Rico 
Administration of Corrections will pay $625,000 to the United States, 
will undertake numerous remedial actions to bring four of its 
facilities into compliance with the Clean Water Act in accordance with 
a schedule specified in the Consent Decree, and will expend $600,000 in 
carrying out additional remedial actions aimed at the improvement of 
community drinking water supplies in Puerto Rico.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed Supplemental Consent Decree. Any comments should be addressed 
to the Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural 
Resources Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and 
should refer to United States v. Puerto Rico Administration of 
Corrections, Civil Action No. 90-2119, D.J. Ref. 90-5-1-1-3364A.
    The proposed Supplemental Consent Decree may be examined at the 
Office of the United States Attorney, District of Puerto Rico, Federal 
Office Building, Rm. 101, Carlos E. Chardon Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto 
Rico 00918, at Region II, Office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007, and at the Consent 
Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, 
(202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Supplemental Consent Decree may 
be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. In requesting a copy, 
please indicate the consent decree desired and enclose a check (there 
is a 25 cent per page reproduction cost) in the amount of $11.75 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-2770 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
No. 9849.

#### Washer et. al. *v.*Iler.

(Decided January 29, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Summit County.

*Messrs.*Rogers, *Rozvely &*Rockwell, for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Holloway & Charhberlin,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OFWASHINGTON, Respondent,

v. JAMES TUKI TAINOINO, Appellant. No. 73644-2-1 DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: October 17, 2016 

### Per Curiam. James Tainoino appeals from his conviction following a plea of 

### guilty to attempted identity theft in the second degree and his sentence within the standard range for a gross misdemeanor. Tainoino's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that there is no basis for a good faith 

### argument on review. Pursuant to State v. Theobald. 78 Wn.2d 184, 470 P.2d 188 (1970), and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L Ed. 2d 493 (1967), the motion to withdraw must 

### [1] be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that 

### might arguably supportthe appeal. [2] A copy ofcounsel's brief should be furnished the indigent and [3] time allowed him to raise anypoints 

### that he chooses; [4] the court-notcounsel-then proceeds, after afull examination of all the proceedings, to decidewhetherthe case is wholly frivolous. Theobald, 78 Wn.2d at 185 (quoting Anders, 386 U.S. at744). 

### This procedure has been followed. Tainoino's counsel on appeal filed a brief with the motion to withdraw. Tainoino was served with a copy of the brief andNo. 73644-2-1/2 

### informed of his right to file a statement ofadditional grounds for review. He did not file a statementofadditional grounds. The facts are accurately setforth incounsel's brief in support ofthe motion to 

### withdraw. The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this courtand has independently reviewed the entire record. The court specifically considered the following potential issues raised by counsel: 1. Did the information provide constitutionally sufficient notice of the charges? 2. Wasthere a sufficientfactual basisto supportTainoino's plea? 3. Was the guilty plea involuntary? 4. Didthetrial courterrin imposing the sentence? 5. Did the sentencing court lack authority to impose legal financial obligations? The potential issues are wholly frivolous. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is dismissed. For the court: 

# UrfJ* cry O C~3
—J ••*-. Sr- . ' •••" Ul -: •-'•'• ro ~-; -.--'.
#### Donald S. BRYANT, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS of the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. T-163.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 1974.

*37Ray Sandstrom, Sandstrom & Hodge, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Stanley P. Kaplan and Michael I. Schwartz, Kaplan & Schwartz, Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, appellant seeks to reverse an order dismissing and quashing a writ of mandamus, which said order of dismissal was entered in the trial court. In its order of dismissal, the trial court stated its view that this matter should be determined initially by the State Board of Medical Examiners with the right to review thereafter by petition for writ of certiorari.

Our review of the record, briefs and arguments herein convinces us that the Order reviewed herein should be affirmed. Section 458.1201(4), Florida Statutes, F.S. A., empowers the Board with discretion in appropriate cases to restore and reissue licenses which have heretofore been revoked or suspended. It seems to us that appellant’s resort to mandamus in the lower court was premature. His quest for reinstatement should commence with a petition for restoration or reissuance filed with the appellee pursuant to the cited statute.

Accordingly, the final order reviewed herein is affirmed without prejudice, of course, to appellant’s right to petition the appellee Board in accordance with the foregoing.

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, B. K., and CHRISTIE, IRWIN G., Associate Judges, concur.
Exhibit 13.1
 
 Certification
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of China Cord Blood Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
 
 The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2011 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 CHINA CORD BLOOD CORPORATIONSeptember 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Ting ZhengName:
Ting ZhengTitle:
Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)September 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Albert ChenName:
Albert ChenTitle:
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
No. 9866.

#### The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. *v.*Johnson, Admx.

(Decided October 2, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Mahoning County.

*Messrs. Arrel, McVey, Rowland & Harrington,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. D. F. Anderson,*for defendant in error.

*568Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Ground stated in journal entry.

It is considered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the court of common pleas in this case be and the same hereby is reversed for error in refusing to give in its charge to the jury the sixth request made by the defendant company below, which request is found on page 185 of the printed record.

Shauck, C. J., Crew, .Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58686-58687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28759]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 64

[CC Docket 96-128; DA 97-2214]


Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the 
Telecommunications Act of 1996

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice of partial waiver of regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 7, 1997, the Common Carrier Bureau granted, on its 
own motion, a limited waiver of five months, until March 9, 1998, to 
those local exchange carriers and payphone service providers that 
cannot provide payphone-specific digits as required by orders in this 
proceeding. This limited waiver applied to the requirement that local 
exchange carriers provide payphone-specific coding digits to payphone 
service providers, and that payphone service providers provide coding 
digits from their payphones before they can receive per-call 
compensation from interexchange carriers for subscriber 800 and access 
code calls, and 0+ and inmate calls (47 CFR 64.1300-64.1340). The 
limited waiver recognized that three parties had filed petitions for 
waiver of the payphone-specific coding digit requirements. This 
document seeks comment on those waiver requests.

DATES: The partial waiver of 47 CFR 64.1300-64.1340 is effective 
October 7, 1997 until March 9, 1998. Comments are due on or before 
October 30, 1997, and reply comments are due on or before November 6, 
1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Room 222, 1919 M St., 
Washington, DC 20554.


[[Page 58687]]



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rose Crellin or Greg Lipscomb, Formal Complaints and Information 
Branch, Enforcement Division, Common Carrier Bureau. (202) 418-0960.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28759 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P-M