##### Table of Contents



---

---

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K/A

(Mark One)

x
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2003o
    
    orTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM    TO


Commission File Number 1-12282

CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Ohio
    
    34-1422570(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)1090 Enterprise Drive, Medina, Ohio
    
    44256(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)


Registrants telephone number, including area code: (330) 723-5082

Securities registered pursuant
to Section 12(b) of the Act:
    
    Securities registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act:Common Shares without par value
    
    NONE(Title of Class)
    
    (Title of Class)


American Stock Exchange
(Name of each exchange on which registered)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES x                                        NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

YES o                                        NO x

The aggregate market value of Common Shares held by nonaffiliates of the
Registrant was approximately $5,297,214 at September 30, 2002. For purposes
of this calculation, the Registrant deems the Common Shares held by its
Directors, executive officers and holders of 10% or more of its Common Shares
to be Common Shares held by affiliates.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of the Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

8,440,847
(Number of Common Shares outstanding as of June 23, 2003.)

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain documents are incorporated
from prior filings (see Part IV of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A).




---

---

1



---

TABLE OF CONTENTS



|                                            |                                                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|PART I                                     
|                                            | ITEM 1. BUSINESS                                                                             
|                                            | ITEM 2. PROPERTIES                                                                           
|                                            | ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS                                                                    
|                                            | ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS                                  
|                                            | ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY                                                   
|PART II                                    
|                                            | ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMPANYS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCK HOLDER MATTERS                  
|                                            | ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA                                                              
|                                            | ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|                                            | ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK                          
|                                            | ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA                             
|                                            | ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 
|                                            | ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT                                  
|                                            | ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION                                                              
|                                            | ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT                      
|                                            | ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS                                      
|                                            | ITEM 14. Controls and Procedures                                                             
|                                            | ITEM 16. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K                     
|SIGNATURES                                 
|Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Auditor
|Exhibit 99.1 906 CEO Certification         
|Exhibit 99.2 906 CFO Certification         



---



##### Table of Contents






PART I




ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

Corrpro Companies, Inc. was founded in 1984 and is organized under the
laws of the State of Ohio. As used in this report, the terms Corrpro and the
Company mean Corrpro Companies, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries unless
the context indicates otherwise.

Recent Events

The Company has retained an investment banking firm to assist in its
efforts to recapitalize its balance sheet and refinance its currently
outstanding Senior Notes and Revolving Credit Facility. The refinancing
process is ongoing and the Company is currently having discussions with various
parties in order to effect a refinancing transaction. There can be no
assurance, however, that the Company will be able to obtain other financing or
as to the terms and conditions under which such financing may be available.

The Company is currently in default of certain financial ratios required
to be maintained under it Senior Note and Revolving Credit Facility agreements.
In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility is scheduled to expire on July 31,
2003 and the Company is required to make a $7.6 million principal payment on
the Senior Notes by July 31, 2003. The Company is also, at the current time,
not able to provide any assurances regarding its ability to make the $7.6
million Senior Note principal payment that is due on July 31, 2003. Further
information about our Long-Term Debt is included in Note 3, Long-Term Debt,
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of
this Form 10-K.

The Company has had preliminary discussions with its lenders regarding an
amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility which would, among other things,
extend the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility beyond July 31, 2003.
The Company intends to continue its efforts to obtain such an amendment,
however, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to negotiate
such an amendment at all or under terms and conditions acceptable to it.

Until such time when the Company is able to refinance the Senior Notes and
Revolving Credit Facility it will attempt to negotiate arrangement with its
lenders to, among other things, waive the covenant violations under the Senior
Notes and Revolving Credit Facility agreement, extend the maturity of the
Revolving Credit Facility beyond July 31, 2003 and defer the principal payments
due under the Senior Notes. If the Company is not able to negotiate mutually
acceptable arrangements with its existing lenders, events could occur that
would have a material adverse effect on the Companys liquidity and financial
condition and could result in its inability to operate as a going concern. If
the Company is unable to operate as a going concern, it may file, or have no
alternative but to file, bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings or pursue a sale
or sales of assets to satisfy creditors.

Products and Services

Corrpro provides corrosion control related services, systems, equipment
and materials to the infrastructure, environmental and energy markets. Our
products and services include (i) corrosion control engineering services,
systems and equipment (corrosion control), (ii) coatings services
(coatings) and (iii) pipeline integrity and risk assessment services.

Corrosion Control.Corrpros specialty in the corrosion control market is
cathodic protection. We offer a comprehensive range of services in this area,
which include the design, manufacture, installation, maintenance and monitoring
of cathodic protection systems. Cathodic protection is an electrochemical
process that prevents corrosion for new structures and stops the corrosion
process for existing structures. It can provide a cost-effective alternative
to the replacement of corroding structures. In order to understand how
cathodic protection works, it is helpful to first understand the corrosion
process. Steel, the most common metal protected by cathodic protection, is
produced from iron ore. To produce steel, the iron ore is subjected to a
refining process that adds energy. Once the steel is put back into the

2



---



##### Table of Contents



environment, it begins to revert back to its original state (i.e., iron
ore) by releasing the added energy back into the surrounding environment. This
process of dispersing energy is called corrosion. Cathodic protection
electrodes, called anodes, are placed near, and connected to, the structure to
be protected (i.e., the cathode). Anodes are typically made from cast iron,
graphite, aluminum, zinc or magnesium. A cathodic protection system works by
passing an electrical current from the anode to the cathode. This process
maintains the energy level on the cathode, thus stopping it from corroding.
Instead, the anode corrodes, sacrificing itself to maintain the integrity of
the structure. In order for the electrical current to pass from the anode to
the cathode, they both must be in a common environment. Therefore, cathodic
protection can only be used to protect structures that are buried in soil,
submerged in water or encased in concrete. Structures commonly protected
against corrosion by the cathodic protection process include oil and gas
pipelines, offshore platforms, above and underground storage tanks, ships,
electric power plants, bridges, parking garages, transit systems and water and
wastewater treatment equipment.

In addition to cathodic protection, our corrosion control services include
corrosion engineering, material selection, inspection services, advanced
corrosion research and testing. We also sell a variety of materials and
equipment including anodes, rectifiers and corrosion monitoring probes used in
cathodic protection and corrosion monitoring systems. Corrosion control
represented approximately 79%, 65% and 74% of our revenues in fiscal years
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Coatings.Corrpro offers a wide variety of coatings-related services
designed to provide our customers with longer coatings life, reduced corrosion,
improved aesthetics and lower life-cycle costs for their coated structures.
Coatings services include research, testing, evaluation and application of
coatings. In addition, we provide project management services for coatings
maintenance programs, including condition surveys, failure analysis, selection
of site surface preparation methods and selection and application of coatings.
We also provide specialized coatings application services for structures with
aggressive corrosion conditions such as the inside and outside of storage tanks
and pipelines. Coatings represented approximately 16%, 30% and 21% of our
revenues in fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Pipeline Integrity and Risk Assessment Services.Corrpro offers a
comprehensive line of pipeline integrity, risk assessment and inspection
services, including assessment, surveys, inspection, analysis, repairs and
ongoing maintenance. By offering a wide range of services, we are able to
provide pipeline owners with one-stop shopping for the preservation of their
pipeline systems. Pipeline integrity and risk assessment services represented
approximately 5% of our revenues in fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001.

Dispositions

In July 2002, the Companys Board of Directors approved a formal business
restructuring plan. The multi-year plan includes a series of initiatives to
improve operating income and reduce debt. The Company intends to sell non-core
business units and use the proceeds to reduce debt. The Company has engaged
outside professionals to assist in the disposition of the domestic and
international non-core business units. Prior to the quarter ended September
30, 2002, the Companys non-core domestic and international units were reported
as the Other Operations and International Operations reporting segments.
Effective as of the quarter ended September 30, 2002, the Other Operations and
the International Operations reporting segments have been eliminated and the
non-core domestic and international units are reported as discontinued
operations. Prior-year financial statements have been reclassified to reflect
these non-core units as discontinued operations, which are also referred to as
assets and liabilities held for sale.

During fiscal 2003, four non-strategic business units were sold. These
dispositions included Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Bass Trigon Software and two
smaller international offices. The proceeds from these dispositions were used
to pay down debt. For further information about our discontinued operations
see Note 2, Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

On March 20, 2002, the Company announced that it had discovered
accounting irregularities caused by apparent internal misconduct in its
Australian subsidiary. The accounting irregularities involved the
overstatement of revenues and understatement of expenses by the Australian
companies. The irregularities were discovered by Corrpro management

3



---



##### Table of Contents



in connection with an internal review of the subsidiarys working capital
management practices and cash flow problems inconsistent with the subsidiarys
reported results. Upon discovering the irregularities, the Company
immediately began an internal investigation conducted under the direction of
the Audit Committee of its Board of Directors. The Audit Committee
subsequently retained special counsel in connection with the investigation and
retained the forensic investigation unit of the accounting firm Deloitte
Touche Tohmatsu.

The Australian subsidiary appointed an administrator and commenced
voluntary administration proceedings, a process under Australian law providing
relief from creditors of Australian companies. As a result of the
appointment, the Company no longer controlled the Australian subsidiary and
the Company recorded a charge to earnings in the fiscal fourth quarter ended
March 31, 2002 for its loss on investment related to the subsidiary.

On April 24, 2002, the creditors of the Australian subsidiary resolved
that the Administrators of the Australian subsidiary should enter into a Deed
of Company Arrangement. The Deed of Company Arrangement became effective May
1, 2002. The arrangement required the Australian subsidiary to make unsecured
payments to the Administrators for the Administrators fees, certain employee
benefit programs and unsecured creditors. The Company is not required to fund
any of these unsecured payments. The Company did guarantee payment of the
Australian subsidiarys bank debt, which totaled $1.1 million at March 31,
2003. This amount is classified as current portion of Long-Term Debt.

On October 1, 2002, the Australian subsidiary sold its business assets
(excluding cash, accounts receivable and certain trademarks) for a purchase
price of $0.6 million. The cash proceeds (except amounts held in escrow) from
the business asset sale were remitted to the Administrator of the Australian
subsidiary in accordance with the Deed of Company Arrangement. The remaining
assets (primarily accounts receivable) are also being liquidated and those
proceeds have been remitted to the Administrator. After satisfying the
obligations under the Deed of Company Arrangement, the Administrator remitted
back to the Australian subsidiary excess funds. The excess funds were used by
the Australian subsidiary to pay post-petition creditors.

During fiscal 2003, the Administrator issued a payment to all unsecured
creditors. The Company is an unsecured creditor for intercompany balances due
from the Australian subsidiary. The Company received $0.6 million on February
7, 2003 from the Administrator.

Segments

We have organized our operations into two business segments: Domestic Core
Operations and Canadian Operations. Our non-core domestic and international
operations are reported as discontinued operations. Our business segments and
a description of the products and services they provide are described below:

Domestic Core Operations.Our Domestic Core Operations segment consists
of operations that service the United States. Products and services include
corrosion control, coatings, pipeline integrity, risk assessment and inspection
services. This segment provides corrosion control products and services to a
wide-range of customers in a number of industries, including energy, utilities,
water and wastewater treatment, chemical and petrochemical, pipelines, defense
and municipalities. In addition, this segment provides coatings services to
customers in the entertainment, aerospace, transportation, petrochemical and
electric power industries, as well as the United States military. Finally, the
Domestic Core Operations segment includes a production facility in the United
States that assembles and distributes cathodic protection products, such as
anodes, primarily to the United States market. Revenues relating to this
segment totaled $85 million (or 82 % of consolidated revenues), $102 million
(or 83% of consolidated revenues) and $96 million (or 80% of consolidated
revenues) during fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Canadian Operations.Our Canadian Operations segment provides corrosion
control, pipeline integrity and inspection services to customers in Canada
which are primarily in the oil and gas industry. These customers include
pipeline operators and petrochemical plants and refineries. The Canadian
Operations segment also includes production facilities that assemble products
such as anodes and rectifiers. Revenues relating to this segment totaled $19
million (or 18% of consolidated revenues), $21 million (or 17% of consolidated
revenues) and $24 million (or 20% of consolidated revenues) during fiscal 2003,
2002 and 2001, respectively.

4



---



##### Table of Contents



Further information about our business segments is included in Note 9,
Business Segments, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item
8 of this Form 10-K.

Sales and Marketing

We market our products and services in the United States and Canada
primarily through our sales personnel. The technical nature of our products
and services requires a highly trained, professional sales force, and, as a
result, many of our sales personnel have engineering or technical expertise and
experience. Due to the problem solving experience of our engineering staff,
potential and existing customers regularly seek out advice from our technical
personnel, which can result in business opportunities on an ongoing basis.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials

We assemble certain components of cathodic protection systems, which
include aluminum, zinc, magnesium and other metallic anodes. We do not believe
that we are dependent upon any single outside vendor as a source of supply and
we believe that sufficient alternative sources of supply for the same, similar
or alternative products are available.

Patents and Licenses

We own patents, patent applications and licenses relating to certain of
our products and processes. While our rights under the patents and licenses
are of importance to individual components of our operations, our business as a
whole is not materially dependent on any one patent or license or on the
patents and licenses as a group.

Seasonal Trends

Our business is somewhat seasonal as winter weather can adversely impact
our operations. Therefore, our revenues during the fourth quarter of our
fiscal year (i.e., January through March) are typically lower than revenues
during each of the other three fiscal quarters.

Foreign Operations

The Companys foreign operations are subject to the usual risks of
operating in foreign jurisdictions. They include, but are not limited to,
exchange controls, currency restrictions and fluctuations, changes in local
economics and changes in political conditions. The realization of the
Companys foreign net assets held for sale are also affected by currency
restrictions and fluctuations.

Customers

Sales are made to a broad range of customers. During the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2003, no one customer accounted for more than 10% of our sales.
We do not believe that the loss of any one customer would have a materially
adverse effect on our business.

We sell products and services to the U.S. government and agencies and
municipalities thereof, including the U.S. Navy. Sales to these customers
accounted for approximately 9%, 16% and 10% of our net sales in fiscal 2003,
2002 and 2001, respectively. Our contracts with the U.S. government contain
standard provisions permitting the government to terminate these contracts
without cause. In the event of termination, we are entitled to receive
reimbursement on the basis of the work completed (cost plus a reasonable
profit). These contracts are also subject to renegotiation of profits. In
addition, government procurement programs are subject to budget cutbacks and
policy changes that could impact the revenue for, or alter the demand for, our
products or services. Accordingly, our future sales to the government are
subject to these budgetary and policy changes.

5



---



##### Table of Contents



Backlog

Our backlog of unshipped orders was approximately $45 million, $44 million
and $46 million as of March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. We estimate
that a substantial portion of our backlog of orders at March 31, 2003 will be
filled during fiscal 2004.

Competitive Conditions

Within the corrosion control market, we face competition from a large
number of domestic and international companies, all of which we believe are
considerably smaller than Corrpro. Only a few of these competitors offer a
broad range of corrosion control engineering services, systems and products and
we do not believe that any of our competitors offer the comprehensive range of
products and services that we provide. In the service area, we compete
principally on the basis of quality, technical expertise and capabilities and
customer service, although price is a consideration, particularly when we are
providing construction and installation services. In the product area, we
typically compete on the basis of quality, service and price.

Research and Development

Our engineering and product development activities are primarily directed
toward designing new products and services to meet customers specific
requirements. Product development costs were minimal in fiscal 2003 and 2002
and amounted to approximately $0.7 million in fiscal 2001.

Government Regulations

We believe that our current operations and our current use of property,
plant and equipment conform in all material respects to applicable laws and
regulations. Other than as disclosed under Item 3  Legal Proceedings, we
have not experienced, nor do we anticipate, any material claim or material
capital expenditure in connection with environmental laws and other regulations
impacting our operations.

Employees

As of March 31, 2003, we had 948 employees, 418 of whom were located
outside the United States.

Factors Influencing Future Results and Accuracy of Forward Looking Information

This document includes certain statements that may be deemed
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
These forward-looking statements are based on managements expectations and
beliefs concerning future events and discuss, among other things, anticipated
future performance and revenues, expected growth and future business plans.
Words such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, believes,
seeks, estimates or variations of such words and similar expressions are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. We believe that the
following factors, among others, could affect our future performance or the
price and liquidity of our common shares and cause our actual results to differ
materially from those that are expressed or implied by forward-looking
statements, or diminish the liquidity of our common shares: our ability to
further extend, amend or refinance our existing debt, including the
availability to us of external sources of financing and capital (the failure to
receive such financing would have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition) and the terms and timing thereof; our
ability to successfully divest our non-core and international business units
and the timing, terms and conditions of such divestitures; the ultimate outcome
of the SECs and the Australian Securities and Investment Commissions
investigation of accounting irregularities; the impact of any litigation or
regulatory process related to the financial statement restatement process,
including the class action litigation already filed (the dismissal of which has
been appealed); our mix of products and services; the timing of jobs; the
availability and value of larger jobs; qualification requirements and
termination provisions relating to government jobs; the impact of inclement
weather on our operations; the impact of energy prices on us and our customers
businesses; adverse developments in pending litigation or regulatory matters;
the impact of existing, new or

6



---



##### Table of Contents



changed regulatory initiatives; our ability to satisfy the listing and trading
requirements of the AMEX (which, if not satisfied, could result in the
suspension of trading  as occurred in August 2002  or delisting of our shares
from the exchange, which could diminish the liquidity of our common shares) or
any other national exchange on which our shares are or will be listed or
otherwise provide a trading venue for our shares; and the impact of changing
global political and economic conditions. In addition, any forward-looking
statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made and we do
not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

All phases of our operations are subject to a number of uncertainties,
risks and other influences, many of which are beyond our control. Any one of
such influences, or a combination, could materially affect the accuracy of the
forward-looking statements and the assumptions on which the statements are
based. Some important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in our
forward-looking statements include the following:

Our ability to obtain extensions, amendments and waivers under our debt
agreements and availability of additional sources of financing and capital.The Company
is currently in default of certain financial ratios required to be
maintained under the current debt agreements which includes its net worth
covenant and its operating income before depreciation and amortization
financial covenant. During fiscal 2003, we had amended our Revolving Credit
Facility and Senior Notes in September 2002 because we were not in compliance
with the provisions, including certain financial covenants, of these agreements
as a result of matters related to the accounting irregularities at our
Australian subsidiary. As amended, the Revolving Credit Facility expires on
July 31, 2003, and it will be necessary for us to amend this Revolving Credit
Facility to extend the expiration date. If we are unable to negotiate a
further amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility, which, among other things,
extends the maturity of the Revolving Credit Facility beyond July 31, 2003, it
will be necessary for us to refinance or repay this debt. We cannot assure
that we will be able to accomplish such a transaction on terms acceptable to us
or at all. Failure to do so would have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity and financial condition and could result in our inability to operate
as a going concern. If we are unable to operate as a going concern, we may
file, or may have no alternative but to file, bankruptcy or insolvency
proceedings or pursue a sale or sales of assets to satisfy creditors. In
addition, the Senior Notes, as amended, require a principal payment of $7.6
million by July 31, 2003 and monthly principal payments of $0.4 million
commencing on August 15, 2003. We cannot assure that we will be able to make
these payments when due, which will result in our being in default under the
Senior Notes and, in that event, the Senior Notes lender may pursue its
remedies against us for such a default, including acceleration of principal,
which would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial
condition and could result in our inability to operate as a going concern. If
we are unable to operate as a going concern, we may file, or may have no
alternative but to file, bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings or pursue a sale
or sales of assets to satisfy creditors. We intend to seek other financing
during fiscal 2004 to pay down the Senior Notes and the Revolving Credit
Facility. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to obtain
other financing or as to the terms and conditions under which such financing
may be available.

The effectiveness of our business restructuring plan.In July 2002, our
Board of Directors approved a formal business restructuring plan. The
multi-year plan includes a series of initiatives to improve operating income
and reduce debt. We intend to sell non-core business units and use the
proceeds to reduce debt. To assist, we have engaged the firm of Carl Marks
Consulting Group LLC and a managing director of Carl Marks has joined us in the
role of Chief Restructuring Officer to manage the plans implementation. While
we expect that operating income improvements combined with debt reduction will
result from the business restructuring plan in the long term, it is uncertain
at this time to what extent such operating income improvements and debt
reduction will be achieved as a result of the business restructuring plan and
the terms and/or timing thereof. We cannot assure that the business
restructuring plan will be successful in enhancing our ability to pursue
financing alternatives acceptable to us. During fiscal 2003, four
non-strategic business units were sold. These dispositions included Rohrback
Cosasco Systems, Bass Trigon Software and two smaller international offices.
The proceeds from these dispositions were used to pay down debt. For further
information about our discontinued operations see Note 2, Assets and
Liabilities Held for Sale, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included
in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

7



---



##### Table of Contents



Our reputation and financial condition could be affected by the securities
litigation and related investigations and/or a restatement of financial
statements.On March 20, 2002, we first announced that we had become aware of
accounting irregularities caused by apparent internal misconduct in our
Australian subsidiary and that, to the extent that the accounting
irregularities materially affect previously filed financial statements, we
restated our audited financial statements for our fiscal year which ended March
31, 2001 as well as unaudited financial information for the first nine months
through December 31, 2001 of our fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, as
previously released. In addition, we recorded a charge to earnings for our
loss on investment related to the subsidiary. This charge was taken in the
Companys fiscal fourth quarter ended March 31, 2002. Subsequent to this
announcement, a purported class action lawsuit was filed against us and certain
of our current and former directors and officers, asserting claims under the
federal securities laws, which was dismissed with prejudice in May 2003. In
June 2003, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal from the order of dismissal.
In addition to significant expenditures we may have to make to defend
ourselves in these matters and the related significant financial penalties that
might be imposed on us if the plaintiffs prevail, the publicity surrounding the
litigation and the SEC inquiry of these matters could affect our reputation
with our customers and suppliers and have an impact on our financial condition
and results of operations.

Our compliance with the listing standards and reporting requirements of
the stock exchange on which our common shares trade.We are required by the
stock exchange on which we list our common shares for trading to maintain
certain listing standards and meet certain reporting requirements in order to
continue trading and to remain listed on that exchange. The exchange does not
use any precise mathematical formula to determine whether a security warrants
continual trading on the exchange. Each case is considered on the basis of all
relevant facts and circumstances. The exchange has adopted certain guidelines
under which it will normally give consideration to suspending dealings in, or
removing, a security from listing. The exchange will normally consider
suspending dealings in, or removing from the list, securities of a company
which does not meet such guidelines. We do not currently have a sufficient
amount of shareholders equity to meet the guidelines. If we cannot
demonstrate that we will be in compliance within a limited time frame, our
common shares may not be allowed to trade on the stock exchange, although we
would pursue an alternative national trading venue and it may make it more
difficult for us to raise funds through the sale of our securities. In
addition, it may make it more difficult for an investor to dispose of, or to
obtain accurate quotations of, our common shares and negatively impact the
market price. Our shares had been suspended from trading on the American Stock
Exchange in August 2002, because of, among other reasons, the late filing of
our Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002. There can be no
assurances that trading will not be suspended again and if so, that trading
would be permitted to resume.

Adverse developments in pending litigation or regulatory matters.From
time to time, we are involved in litigation and regulatory proceedings,
including those disclosed in Legal Proceedings of this annual report and in
our other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
There are always significant uncertainties involved in litigation and
regulatory proceedings and we cannot guarantee the result of any action.
Regulatory compliance is often complex and subject to variation and unexpected
changes, including changing interpretations and enforcement agendas affecting
the regulatory community. We may need to expend significant financial resources
in connection with legal and regulatory procedures and our management may be
required to divert attention from other portions of our business. If, as a
result of any proceeding, a judgment is rendered, decree is entered or
administrative action is taken against us or our customers, it may materially
and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.

Our profitability can be impacted by our mix of products and services.
Given that our selling, general and administrative costs are largely fixed in
terms of dollars, our profitability is dependent upon the amount of gross
profit that we are able to realize. We typically generate higher gross profit
margins on pure engineering service jobs than on those jobs that include a
material or installation component. In addition, our gross profit margins also
can be negatively impacted when we utilize subcontractors. Therefore, a shift
in mix from engineering services to more construction and installation type
work or an increase in the amount of subcontracting costs could have a negative
impact on our operating results. In addition, certain of the products that we
sell have gross profit margins that are considerably lower than our overall
average gross profit margin. A shift in mix which results in a greater
percentage of revenues relating to these lower margin products would also have
a negative impact on our operating results.

8



---



##### Table of Contents



The timing of jobs can impact our profitability.There are a number of
factors, some of which are beyond our control, that can cause projects to be
delayed and thus negatively impact our profitability for the related period.
These factors include the availability of labor, equipment or materials,
customer scheduling issues, delays in obtaining required permits and weather.
In addition, when we are working as a subcontractor on a project, our portion
of the project can be delayed as a result of factors relating to other
contractors.

The availability and value of larger jobs can impact our profitability.
While the majority of our jobs are relatively small, we can have a number of
individual contracts in excess of $1 million in progress at any particular
time. These larger contracts typically generate more gross profit dollars than
our average size jobs. Therefore, the absence of larger jobs, which can result
from a number of factors, including market conditions, can have a negative
impact on our operating results.

Qualification requirements and termination provisions relating to
government jobs.We derive revenues from contracts with the United States, its
agencies and other governmental entities. Government contracting is subject to
competitive bidding processes and there can be no assurance that we will be the
successful bidder for future contracts. Fluctuations in government spending and
the amount of government contracts received also could adversely affect our
revenues and profitability. In addition, it is the policy of the United States
that certain small businesses and other concerns have the maximum practicable
opportunity to participate in performing contracts let by any federal agency.
To the extent that we do not meet applicable criteria for government jobs, we
could be limited in our ability to participate directly in contracts being let
by the United States and other governmental entities with similar requirements.
Certain contracts with governmental entities contain provisions permitting the
governmental entities to terminate the contract for convenience prior to
completion of the contract. To the extent that any of our contracts with a
government entity are so terminated, our revenues and profitability could be
adversely impacted.

Our operations can be impacted by inclement weather.A large portion of
our service work is performed in the field. Therefore, excessive amounts of
rain, snow or cold, as well as other unusual weather conditions, including
hurricanes and typhoons, can result in work stoppages. Also, working under
inclement weather conditions can reduce our efficiencies, which can have a
negative impact on our profitability.

Our business is impacted by changes in energy prices.The products and
services we provide to our customers in the energy markets are, to some extent,
deferrable in the event that these customers reduce their capital and
discretionary maintenance expenditures. The level of spending on these types
of expenditures can be influenced by oil and gas prices and industry
perceptions of future prices. Our experience indicates that our energy
customers react to declining oil and gas prices by reducing their capital and
discretionary maintenance expenditures. This reaction has in the past, and may
in the future, have a negative impact on our business. We are unable to
predict future oil and gas prices. However, we believe that a prolonged period
of low energy prices could have a negative impact on our business. Typically,
there is a delay between the time prices decline and when we start to
experience a negative impact on our results of operations. Conversely, there
is also a delay between the time energy prices increase and when we start to
experience a positive impact on our results of operations.

The impact of changing global, political and economic conditions.
Changing political and economic conditions regionally or worldwide can
adversely impact our business. Deteriorating political and general economic
conditions may result in customers delaying or canceling contracts and orders
for our products and services, difficulties and inefficiencies in the
performance of our services including work stoppages, and difficulties in
collecting payment from our customers. As a result, such conditions can
negatively impact our results of operations and our cash flows. Moreover, we
have operations in the Middle East region with revenues totaling $11.6 million
for fiscal 2003 and net assets of approximately $6.3 million at March 31, 2003.
These operations can be negatively impacted by changing economic and political
conditions. All of our international operations except Canada are a part of
the Companys net assets held for sale.

Existing, new or changed regulatory initiatives can impact our business.
Corrpro and its customers are subject to federal, state and local environmental
and other laws and regulations. These laws and regulations affect our
operations by imposing standards for the protection of health, welfare and the
environment. Such laws and regulations, and

9



---



##### Table of Contents



applicable interpretations thereof, could expose us to liability for acts
which are or were in compliance at the time such acts were performed. We
cannot predict whether future legislative or regulatory developments may occur
which would have an adverse effect on Corrpro.

These risks must be considered by any investor or potential investor in
the Company.

10



---



##### Table of Contents






ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

As of March 31, 2003, our continuing operations utilized five locations
and are owned by the Company as well as over forty locations were leased from
unrelated third parties. Certain property locations may contain multiple
operations, such as an office and warehouse facility. Owned and leased
facilities with greater than 5,000 square feet are listed below.

|                             |  |               |  |                                           |  |              |  |  |  |  |  | 
|---------------------------- |  | ------------- |  | ----------------------------------------- |  | ------------ |  |  |  |  |  | 
|Location                     |  | Segment       |  | Description                               |  | Owned/Leased
|                             |  |               |  |                                           |  |             
|Bakersfield, California      |  | Domestic Core |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Leased      
|Belle Chasse, Louisiana      |  | Domestic Core |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Leased      
|Brampton, Ontario            |  | Canadian Ops. |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Leased      
|Conyers, Georgia             |  | Domestic Core |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Leased      
|Dorval, Quebec               |  | Canadian Ops. |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Leased      
|Edmonton, Alberta            |  | Canadian Ops. |  | Office, Production and Warehouse Facility |  | Owned       
|Nisku, Alberta               |  | Domestic Core |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Owned       
|Estevan, Saskatchewan        |  | Canadian Ops. |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Owned       
|Glendale, Arizona            |  | Domestic Core |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Leased      
|Houston, Texas               |  | Domestic Core |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Leased      
|Medina, Ohio                 |  | Corporate     |  | Corporate Headquarters                    |  | Owned       
|Medina, Ohio                 |  | Domestic Core |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Owned       
|Ocean City, New Jersey       |  | Domestic Core |  | Office Facility                           |  | Leased      
|San Leandro, California      |  | Domestic Core |  | Office, Production and Warehouse Facility |  | Leased      
|Sand Springs, Oklahoma       |  | Domestic Core |  | Office, Production and Warehouse Facility |  | Leased      
|Santa Fe Springs, California |  | Domestic Core |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Leased      
|Schaumburg, Illinois         |  | Domestic Core |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Leased      
|West Chester, Pennsylvania   |  | Domestic Core |  | Office and Warehouse Facility             |  | Leased      

We consider the properties owned or leased by us to be generally
sufficient to meet our requirements for office, production and warehouse space.
We do not consider any one of our properties to be significant, since we
believe that if it becomes necessary or desirable to relocate any of our
office, production and warehouse facilities, other suitable properties could be
found. Our owned properties are subject to mortgages or other security
interests under our senior secured credit agreement and senior note facility
and other bank credit arrangements.

11



---



##### Table of Contents






ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

As previously reported, in January 2000, the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ) issued an administrative decision which
effectively limited the scope of MDEQs 1995 approval of certain assessment
methodologies utilized by Corrpro in determining whether certain underground
storage tanks meet Michigans regulatory requirements for upgrade by means of
cathodic protection. The MDEQ decision also would have required us to conduct
further assessments and provide certain information. The assessment
methodologies at issue have been and remain recognized by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the other states in which we utilized such
methodologies for virtually identical purposes. We believed that MDEQs
decision was in error and on January 24, 2000, filed a complaint and claim of
appeal in the Circuit Court for the County of Ingham, Michigan seeking
declaratory relief and appealing the decision on several grounds. In its
November 14, 2000 ruling, the Ingham Circuit Court reversed MDEQs decision
that directed we take certain actions and provide certain information, however,
the court also found that MDEQ had not approved the full use of the assessment
methodologies we utilized in Michigan.

We believed that the circuit courts finding that MDEQ had not approved
full use of the methodologies was not supported by the evidence, and was
contradicted by evidence contained in the administrative record. On December
5, 2000, we filed, in the Michigan Court of Appeals, an application for leave
to appeal the circuit courts finding that MDEQ did not approve the full use of
the assessment methodologies we utilized in Michigan. By order dated February
14, 2001, the Michigan Court of Appeals denied our application for leave to
appeal the circuit courts finding. On March 7, 2001, we filed an application
for leave to appeal with the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan. On August
28, 2001, the Michigan Supreme Court denied our application for leave to
appeal.

As a result of these proceedings, the MDEQs administrative decision
finding that certain of our assessment methodologies were not approved in full
was upheld, but the MDEQ was found not to have jurisdiction to enforce its
decision against us. In July 2002, the MDEQ sent certain underground storage
tank owners and operators who may have relied on our method of assessment a
notice informing them that certain of such owners and operators tanks were
improperly upgraded, that such owners and operators are to provide to MDEQ upon
request evidence that they have conducted state required tank tightness
testing, and certain of such tanks must be internally inspected. MDEQ also
advised that internally inspected tanks that do not satisfy applicable criteria
should be taken out-of-service and removed from the ground. There can be no
assurance that the MDEQ will not take further action against underground
storage tank owners or operators.

On July 25, 2002, a summons and complaint was issued from the Circuit
Court for the County of Ingham, Michigan. The action was commenced by Blodgett
Oil Company, Inc. and other owners and operators of underground storage tanks
systems on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated. The complaint
relates to the MDEQ regulatory proceeding described immediately above and names
both the Company and MDEQ. The plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of
damages in excess of $25,000 from Corrpro. The plaintiffs also seek injunctive
relief prohibiting the MDEQ from declaring that underground storage tanks
upgraded by the Company do not meet the current requirement for corrosion
protection set forth by law. On November 18, 2002, the court issued an order
certifying the underlying class. The Michigan Court of Appeals denied the
Companys application for leave to appeal the Circuit Courts order certifying
the underlying class. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses
to the claims asserted, including that damages have not yet been incurred.
Notwithstanding such defenses, under applicable law the Company believes that
the class would not be entitled to certain of the damages alleged. The Company
is unable at this time to make a determination as to whether a material
adverse outcome is reasonably possible and whether an adverse outcome would
have a materially adverse affect on its operations or financial condition.

During fiscal 2001, the Company discovered that a former employee used an
incorrect assessment standard in connection with the evaluation of whether
certain underground storage tanks located at as many as 67 sites were eligible
for upgrade using cathodic protection. Such evaluations were done using one of
the approved assessment methodologies. The tanks at these sites, which are
located in five states, were subsequently upgraded using cathodic protection,
which arrests corrosion. These tanks are also subject to ongoing leak
detection requirements. Based on the Companys review of available information
and governmental records, the Company believes that there have not been any
releases from the affected tanks as a result of the actions of the former
employee. The Company has contacted, and in October and

12



---



##### Table of Contents



November 2000 met with, officials from the EPA and officials from the
corresponding environmental protection agencies of the five states involved to
discuss this matter. It is the Companys understanding that none of the states
nor the EPA intend to take any enforcement action as a result of the use of the
inaccurate standard by the former employee. The Company is currently working
with the states and the EPA to develop and implement field investigation
procedures to assess the current status of the affected sites. In one of the
states in which affected sites are located, the Company has completed field
investigation procedures. The Company has been informed by one of the other
states that, based on continuing monitoring and leak detection procedures
already required to be performed by site owners and operators, no additional
field work procedures will be required. The Company has commenced agreed upon
field work procedures in a third state. There are no currently outstanding
claims or demands that have been asserted by any of the affected owners and
operators. Based on currently available information, including the Companys
experience in the fieldwork conducted to date, the Company does not believe
that it is reasonably possible that the cost of further field investigation
procedures for this matter will have a material effect on the future
operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

The Company is a defendant in a purported class action suit filed on June
24, 2002, in the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division. The complaint also names certain former and current officers
and directors of the Company as defendants. The complaint was purportedly
filed on behalf of all persons who purchased Corrpro Common Shares during the
period April 1, 2000 through March 20, 2002 and alleges violations of the
federal securities laws resulting in artificially inflated prices of the
Companys Common Shares during the class period. The complaint relates to the
Companys announcement that it had discovered accounting irregularities caused
by apparent internal misconduct in its Australian subsidiary. The complaint
seeks unspecified compensatory damages, fees and expenses on behalf of the
putative class.

At least as early as October 2000, the then managing director and the
financial controller of Corrpro Australia Pty., Ltd., a subsidiary of Company,
were involved in knowingly misstating the financial results reported by the
Australian subsidiary to corporate management of the Company to improve the
reported results of the Australian business. Such individuals are no longer
employed by the Company or its subsidiaries and are defendants in a complaint
for permanent injunctive and other equitable relief filed by the SEC in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The former
Australian employees are also subject to an investigation and other proceedings
commenced through the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

The irregularities included erroneous journal entries to the Australian
subsidiarys general ledger that increased profit and net assets. Among other
things, the former Australian employees falsified invoices and credit notes and
made erroneous entries to subledgers including accounts payables, accounts
receivables, cost of goods sold and inventory. The former Australian employees
further recorded fictitious invoices in the former Australian subsidiarys
computerized accounting records, falsified credit notes from suppliers, and
created two different versions of the accounts receivable subledger. The
former Australian employees took steps to fabricate documents to be reviewed by
the Companys independent auditors.

As a result of its discovery of the irregularities, the Company, by means
of its Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2002, restated its previously
issued audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001.
The effect of the restatement was to increase the Companys loss and basic and
diluted loss per share, respectively, from $4.7 million and $0.61 to $8.3
million and $1.07 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001. Consolidated
stockholders equity as of March 31, 2001 decreased by approximately $3.8
million from amounts previously reported. Unaudited quarterly financial
information for the first three quarters of the fiscal year ended March 31,
2002 and all four quarters of its fiscal year ended March 31, 2001, were also
restated by means of such filing. Information concerning the restated amounts
applicable to each of the foregoing quarters is contained in Note 12, Restated
Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited), Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 8 of the Companys Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 9, 2002.

On May 27, 2003, the District Court granted, with prejudice, the
defendants motions to dismiss the amended and consolidated class action
complaint. On June 24, 2003, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit from the order of
dismissal. The Company is unable at this time to make a

13



---



##### Table of Contents



determination as to whether a material adverse outcome is reasonably
possible and whether an adverse outcome would have a materially adverse affect
on its operations or financial condition.

Company management discovered accounting irregularities at the Australian
subsidiary in early calendar 2002 and upon discovery immediately began an
internal investigation, which has been conducted under the direction of the
Audit Committee of its Board of Directors. The Australian Securities and
Investments Commission has commenced an independent investigation of the
accounting irregularities. Corrpro voluntarily disclosed this matter to the
SEC, which has commenced a formal inquiry. Corrpro is cooperating with both
commissions.

In January 2003, the Company received a Consolidated Compliance Order and
Notice of Potential Penalty from the Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality pursuant to which the department alleges that the Companys foundry
operations failed to submit required storm water monitoring information as
required by law. The alleged failure relates to periods subsequent to the
cessation of the Companys foundry operations. The Company has appealed the
matter and the department has agreed to engage in informal resolution of the
matter. Based on current available information, the Company does not believe
that it is reasonably possible that this matter will have a material effect on
the future operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

The Company is subject to other legal proceedings and claims which arise
in the ordinary course of business.

14



---



##### Table of Contents






ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.




ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

The following table sets forth the names of all executive officers of the
Company as of March 31, 2003 and certain other information relating to their
position held with the Company and other business experience.

|                       |  |     |    |                            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |  | 
|---------------------- |  | --- | -- | -------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Executive Officer      |  | Age |    | Recent Business Experience
|                       |  |     |    |                           
|Joseph W. Rog          |  |     | 63 |                            |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors since June 1993
and Chief Executive Officer since the Companys
formation in 1984.  President of the Company since
June 1995 and from January 1984 to June 1993.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|                      
|Michael K. Baach       |  |     | 48 |                            |  | Executive Vice President since April 1993 and
Senior Vice President from 1992 until April 1993.
Prior to that, Mr. Baach was Vice President of
Sales and Marketing since the Companys formation in 1984.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|                      
|George A. Gehring, Jr. |  |     | 59 |                            |  | Executive Vice President since April 1993 and
Senior Vice President from 1991 until April 1993.
Prior to that, Mr. Gehring served as President of
Ocean City Research Corporation, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, since 1987.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|                      
|David H. Kroon         |  |     | 53 |                            |  | Executive Vice President since April 1993 and
Senior Vice President from the Companys formation
in 1984 to April 1993.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|                      
|Barry W. Schadeck      |  |     | 52 |                            |  | Executive Vice President since June 1995 and
President of Corrpro Canada, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, since its formation in
May 1994.  Prior to that, Mr. Schadeck served as
President since April 1993 and Chief Financial
Officer since 1979 of Commonwealth Seager Group, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, since
1993.                                                                                                                                                                                             | 
|                      
|Robert M. Mayer        |  |     | 40 |                            |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer since  November 2002.  Prior to that,
Mr. Mayer served as the Companys Vice President
and Corporate Controller since August 2000,
Assistant Treasurer since January 2002 and
Assistant Corporate Controller from January 1998
until August 2000.  Prior to that, Mr. Mayer was
with Premier Farnell PLC, an industrial
distributor of electronic components, most
recently as Director of Finance.  Mr. Mayer has
prior experience with Ernst & Young, where he was
an Audit Manager.
|                      
|John D. Moran          |  |     | 45 |                            |  | General Counsel since December 1996, Secretary
since January 2002, Senior Vice President since
July 2000.  Assistant Secretary from December 1996
to January 2002 and Vice President from October
1998 until July 2000.  Prior to that, Mr. Moran
was in-house counsel for Sealy Corporation, a
bedding manufacturer, for 10 years and served as
Secretary.  Mr. Moran also has prior experience
with Grant Thornton.                                                                                                                              

15



---



##### Table of Contents






PART II




ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMPANYS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCK HOLDER MATTERS

Price Range of Common Shares

Our Common Shares are listed on the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) under
the symbol CO. Prior to February 13, 2002, our Common Shares were listed on
the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol CO.

The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices for the Common
Shares on the AMEX and NYSE for the fiscal periods indicated.

|               |  |             |      |             |  |      |      |     |  |   |      |  |  |   |      | 
|-------------- |  | ----------- | ---- | ----------- |  | ---- | ---- | --- |  | - | ---- |  |  | - | ---- | 
|               |  | Fiscal 2003 |      | Fiscal 2002
|               |  |             |      |            
|               |  | High        |      | Low         |  | High |      | Low
|               |  |             |      |             |  |      |      |    
|First Quarter  |  | $           | 1.80 |             |  | $    | 1.08 |     |  | $ | 3.95 |  |  | $ | 1.20 | 
|Second Quarter |  |             | 1.15 |             |  |      | 0.58 |     |  |   | 2.90 |  |  |   | 1.80 | 
|Third Quarter  |  |             | 0.75 |             |  |      | 0.38 |     |  |   | 2.80 |  |  |   | 1.50 | 
|Fourth Quarter |  |             | 0.80 |             |  |      | 0.30 |     |  |   | 3.15 |  |  |   | 1.01 | 

We are required by the stock exchange to maintain certain listing
standards and meet certain reporting requirements in order to continue trading
and to remain listed on the exchange. The exchange does not use any precise
mathematical formula to determine whether a security warrants continual trading
on the exchange. Each case is considered on the basis of all relevant facts
and circumstances. The exchange has adopted certain guidelines under which it
will normally give consideration to suspending dealings in, or removing, a
security from listing. The exchange will normally consider suspending dealings
in, or removing from the list, securities of a company which does not meet such
guidelines. As of March 31, 2003, we did not have a sufficient amount of
shareholders equity to meet the guidelines. If we cannot demonstrate that we
will be in compliance within a limited time frame, our Common Shares may not be
allowed to trade in the stock exchange, although we would pursue an alternative
national trading venue.

Holders of Record

On June 23, 2003, there were 195 holders of record of our Common Shares.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our Common Shares. We currently
anticipate that we will retain all future earnings for use in our business and
do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Provisions within our senior secured credit agreement and senior notes facility
limit our ability to pay cash dividends.

16



---



##### Table of Contents



Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides certain information with respect to all of
the Companys equity compensation plans in effect as of March 31, 2003.

Equity Compensation Plan Information Table

|                                                           |  |                   |           |                   |  |                     |        |           |  |  |         | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | --------- | ----------------- |  | ------------------- | ------ | --------- |  |  | ------- | 
|                                                           |  | Number of         |           |                   |  |                     |        |           |  | 
|                                                           |  | Securities to be  |           |                   |  |                     |        | Number of
|                                                           |  | Issued upon       |           | Weighted-Average  |  | Securities         
|                                                           |  | Exercise of       |           | Exercise Price of |  | Remaining Available
|                                                           |  | Outstanding       |           | Outstanding       |  | for Issuance Under 
|                                                           |  | Options, Warrants |           | Options, Warrants |  | Equity Compensation
|Plan Category                                              |  | and Rights        |           | and Rights        |  | Plans (1)          
|                                                           |  |                   |           |                   |  |                    
|Equity compensation
plans approved by
shareholders         |  |                   | 1,399,027 |                   |  | $                   | 3.1258 |           |  |  | 233,586 | 
|Equity compensation
plans not approved
by shareholders (2) |  |                   |          |                   |  |                     |       |           |  |  |        | 
|                                                           |  |                   |           |                   |  |                     |        |           |  |  |         | 
|Total                                                      |  |                   | 1,399,027 |                   |  | $                   | 3.1258 |           |  |  | 233,586 | 
|                                                           |  |                   |           |                   |  |                     |        |           |  |  |         | 



---

|(1) |  | Includes 46,875 Common Shares available for issuance under the
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | Does not include the Companys 2001 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Appreciation Rights Plan which has not been approved by its shareholders.
Under this plan, non-employee directors received a one-time grant of
vested stock appreciation rights as part of their compensation for serving
as directors. The stock appreciation rights entitle each eligible
director to be paid in cash, subject to the applicable terms and
conditions of the grant, on or after May 17, 2006, the amount of
appreciation in the fair market value of 10,000 Common Shares between May
17, 2001 and May 17, 2006. Currently, three such non-employee directors
hold such stock appreciation rights. Moreover, this does not include
shares authorized for payment of bonuses totaling 25,000 of which 22,500
are still available. Also, this does not include the Companys Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, which has been suspended, with authorized shares
totaling 375,000 of which 300,068 shares are still available.

17



---



##### Table of Contents






ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The financial data presented below for each of the five years ended March
31 should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial
Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in
this Form 10-K.

|                                                             |         |   |                                       |       |      |   |         |       |      |   |         |       |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |      | 
|------------------------------------------------------------ | ------- | - | ------------------------------------- | ----- | ---- | - | ------- | ----- | ---- | - | ------- | ----- | - | - | ------- | ----- | - | - | ------- | ---- | 
|                                                             |         |   | 2003                                  |       | 2002 |   | 2001    |       | 2000 |   | 1999   
|                                                             |         |   |                                       |       |      |   |         |       |      |   |        
|                                                             |         |   | (In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|Statement of Operations Data:                                |         |   |                                       |       |      |   |         |       |      |   |         |       |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |     
|Revenues                                                     |         | $ | 104,220                               |       |      | $ | 123,058 |       |      | $ | 120,489 |       |   | $ | 119,133 |       |   | $ | 123,061 |     
|Operating income (loss) (1)                                  |         |   | 2,825                                 |       |      |   | 3,405   |       |      |   | (371    | )     |   |   | 5,046   |       |   |   | 15,666  |     
|Interest expense                                             |         |   | 5,907                                 |       |      |   | 5,055   |       |      |   | 4,401   |       |   |   | 3,444   |       |   |   | 2,247   |     
|                                                             |         |   |                                       |       |      |   |         |       |      |   |         |       |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |     
|Income (loss) before income taxes from
continuing operations |         |   | (3,082                                | )     |      |   | (1,650  | )     |      |   | (4,772  | )     |   |   | 1,602   |       |   |   | 13,419  |     
|Income tax provision (benefit)(3)                            |         |   | (331                                  | )     |      |   | 10,669  |       |      |   | (934    | )     |   |   | 943     |       |   |   | 4,813   |     
|                                                             |         |   |                                       |       |      |   |         |       |      |   |         |       |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |     
|Income (loss) from continuing operations                     |         |   | (2,751                                | )     |      |   | (12,319 | )     |      |   | (3,838  | )     |   |   | 659     |       |   |   | 8,606   |     
|                                                             |         |   |                                       |       |      |   |         |       |      |   |         |       |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |     
|Net income (loss)(2)                                         |         | $ | (28,825                               | )     |      | $ | (18,217 | )     |      | $ | (8,281  | )     |   | $ | (2,668  | )     |   | $ | 4,251   |     
|                                                             |         |   |                                       |       |      |   |         |       |      |   |         |       |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |     
|Earnings (loss) per share from
Continuing operations-        |         |   |                                       |       |      |   |         |       |      |   |         |       |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |     
|                                                             | Basic   |   | $                                     | (0.33 | )    |   | $       | (1.52 | )    |   | $       | (0.50 | ) |   | $       | 0.09  |   |   | $       | 1.10 | 
|                                                             | Diluted |   |                                       | (0.33 | )    |   |         | (1.52 | )    |   |         | (0.50 | ) |   |         | 0.08  |   |   |         | 1.05 | 
|Net income (loss)-                                           |         |   |                                       |       |      |   |         |       |      |   |         |       |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |     
|                                                             | Basic   |   | $                                     | (3.43 | )    |   | $       | (2.24 | )    |   | $       | (1.07 | ) |   | $       | (0.35 | ) |   | $       | 0.54 | 
|                                                             | Diluted |   |                                       | (3.43 | )    |   |         | (2.24 | )    |   |         | (1.07 | ) |   |         | (0.34 | ) |   |         | 0.52 | 
|Other Data:                                                  |         |   |                                       |       |      |   |         |       |      |   |         |       |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |     
|Total assets                                                 |         | $ | 76,983                                |       |      | $ | 109,963 |       |      | $ | 137,200 |       |   | $ | 140,864 |       |   | $ | 146,050 |     
|Working Capital, excluding net assets
held for sale          |         |   | (28,095                               | )     |      |   | (40,939 | )     |      |   | 28,501  |       |   |   | 28,639  |       |   |   | 35,569  |     
|Net Assets Held for Sale                                     |         |   | 7,364                                 |       |      |   | 35,783  |       |      |   | 38,439  |       |   |   | 43,226  |       |   |   | 47,631  |     
|Total debt                                                   |         |   | 51,241                                |       |      |   | 62,686  |       |      |   | 68,124  |       |   |   | 62,150  |       |   |   | 62,686  |     
|Shareholders equity                                         |         |   | 1,199                                 |       |      |   | 23,857  |       |      |   | 41,518  |       |   |   | 54,235  |       |   |   | 58,056  |     



---

|(1) |  | Includes charges totaling $2,868 in fiscal 2001 and $2,000 in fiscal
2000. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.                                                      
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | Includes a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $18,238
in fiscal 2003, related to our evaluation of goodwill. See Note 1,
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information.
|   
|(3) |  | Includes a valuation allowance of $10,472 in fiscal 2002, related to our
deferred tax asset. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information.                                    

18



---



##### Table of Contents






ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General

The following discussion and analysis contains certain statements that
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause
actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. See Business  Factors
Influencing Future Results and Accuracy of Forward Looking Information.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Companys critical accounting policies, including the assumptions and
judgments underlying them, are more fully described in Note 1  Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements of this Form 10-K. Some of the Companys accounting policies
require the application of significant judgment by management in the
preparation of the Companys financial statements. In applying these policies,
the Companys management uses its best judgment to determine the underlying
assumptions that are used in calculating the estimates that affect the reported
values on its financial statements. Management bases its estimates and
assumptions on historical experience and other factors that the Company
considers relevant. Corrpros critical accounting policies include the
following:

Revenue Recognition

The Company records income from construction and engineering contracts
under the percentage-of- completion method, using costs incurred to date in
relation to estimated total costs of the contracts, to measure the stage of
completion. Original contract prices are adjusted for change orders and claims
when the change order or claim has been approved by the customer. Cost budgets
are revised, when necessary, in the amounts that are reasonably estimated based
on the Project Leaders knowledge of the project as well as the Companys
historical experience. The cumulative effects of changes in estimated total
contract costs and revenues are recorded in the period in which the facts
requiring such revisions become known, and are accounted for using the
percentage-of-completion method. At the time it is determined that a contract
is expected to result in a loss, the entire estimated loss is recorded. . The
Company recognizes revenue from product sales upon shipment and transfer of
ownership.

Accounts Receivable

The Company records estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts
receivable based upon the number of days the accounts are past due, the current
business environment, and specific information such as bankruptcy or liquidity
issues of customers. Historically, losses for uncollectible accounts receivable
have been within managements estimates. Corrosion control services and
products are provided to a large number of customers with no substantial
concentration in a particular industry or with an individual customer.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market with cost being
determined on the first-in, first-out method.

Management periodically reviews inventories for excess and obsolete goods
based upon a combination of historical and forecasted usage. Additionally,
discrete provisions are made when facts and circumstances indicate that
particular inventories will not be utilized. If future market conditions are
different than those estimated, a change to the valuation of inventory may be
required and would be reflected in the period the conditions change.

19



---



##### Table of Contents



Asset Impairment

The Company periodically evaluates whether events and circumstances have
occurred that indicate the remaining estimated useful life of any long-lived or
intangible asset may warrant revision or that the remaining balance of the
asset may not be recoverable. If factors indicate that the long-lived assets
should be evaluated for possible impairment, the Company uses an estimate of
the related assets net undiscounted cash flows from operations over the
remaining life to determine recoverability. The measurement of the impairment
would be based on the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds
its fair value.

During fiscal 2003, the Company recorded an impairment charge relating to
its Asia Pacific operations totaling $1.6 million based on current market value
of these operations and additionally recorded impairment charges totaling $0.9
million based on market value analysis for its European and Middle East
operations. The Asia Pacific, European and Middle East operations are all
reported as discontinued operations.

In July 2001, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141,
Business Combinations (SFAS 141), and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), were
issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. SFAS 141 eliminates the
pooling-of-interests method for business combinations and requires the use of
the purchase method. SFAS 142 changes the accounting for goodwill and
indefinite life intangibles from an amortization approach to a non-amortization
approach, and require periodic tests for impairment of these assets. Upon the
Companys adoption of SFAS 142 on April 1, 2002, the provisions of SFAS 142
required the discontinuance of amortization of goodwill and indefinite life
intangibles that had been recorded in connection with previous business
combinations. The adoption of SFAS 142 reduced amortization expense
approximately $1.7 million for the year ended March 31, 2003 as compared to the
year ended March 31, 2002. The Company has completed its impairment testing
under SFAS 142 and recorded an impairment loss, as of April 1, 2002, totaling
$18.2 million of which $11.8 million related to discontinued operations and
$6.4 million related to continuing operations. The loss is being recognized as
the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. This impairment
testing is also done annually in the fourth quarter and such testing resulted
in no additional impairment as of March 31, 2003.

Income taxes

The Company uses the liability method whereby income taxes are recognized
during the fiscal year in which transactions enter into the determination of
financial statement income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between
financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities. The Company
recorded a valuation allowance for its net domestic deferred tax assets
carryforwards of $10.5 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. The
Company maintained a valuation allowance at March 31, 2003 and intends to
maintain a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets and net
operating loss carryforwards until sufficient positive evidence exists to
support the reversal of the remaining reserve. Until such time, except for
foreign tax provisions, the Company expects to have no reported tax provision,
net of valuation allowance adjustments. In the event the Company was to
determine, based on the existence of sufficient positive evidence, that it
would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its
net recorded amount, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would increase
income in the period such determination was made. See Note 5 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for additional information
regarding income taxes.

Results of Operations

In July 2002, the Companys Board of Directors approved a formal business
restructuring plan. The multi-year plan includes a series of initiatives to
improve operating income and reduce debt. At the request of our current
lenders the Company intends to sell non-core business units (including all
international offices), and use the proceeds to reduce debt. The Company has
engaged outside professionals to assist in the disposition of the domestic and
international non-core business units. Prior to the quarter ended September
30, 2002, the Companys non-core domestic and international units were reported
as the Other Operations and International Operations reporting segments.
Effective as of the quarter ended September 30, 2002, the Other Operations and
the International Operations reporting segments have been eliminated and the
non-core domestic and international units have been reported as discontinued
operations. Prior-year financial statements have been reclassified to reflect
these non-core units as discontinued operations, which are also referred to as

20



---



##### Table of Contents



assets and liabilities held for sale. The main reason for the
divestiture of these business units is to generate cash to pay down outstanding
debt. In addition, it will allow the Company to focus on growing its core
business in North America.

Year Ended March 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2002

Revenues

Revenues for fiscal 2003 totaled $104.2 million, compared with $123.1
million for fiscal 2002, a decrease of 15.3%.

Our Domestic Core Operations generated revenues of $85.0 million compared
with $101.8 million, a decrease of 16.5%. This decrease is due to a number of
factors. The most significant factor related to our Preservation Team contracts with
the U.S. Navy. Since June 2000, we have been providing Preservation Team
services to the U.S. Navy under a demonstration contract. In calendar 2002
these contracts were placed in the normal Navy procurement process and put out
for competitive bid. A number of these contracts were
designated as small business contracts and we did not qualify as a small
business. Therefore, we were not able to compete for these contracts as a
prime contractor, although we were eventually awarded a number of subcontracts
for this work. The net result was a reduction in revenues of approximately
$11.6 million in fiscal year 2003. In fiscal 2003 we also made the decision to
close two offices in New Mexico and South America, resulting in lost revenues
of approximately $1.9 million. The remaining decrease is primarily due to
decreased material sales of $1.1 million and lower revenues generated by our
commercial coatings offices of $1.3 million.

Revenues relating to our Canadian Operations segment totaled $19.3
million, compared to $21.3 million in fiscal 2002, a decrease of 9.4%. The
decrease is due primarily to lower material and rectifier sales and the closure
of our office in Taiwan. The Canadian Operations continue to experience
weakness in the energy segment of its business.

Gross Profit

On a consolidated basis, gross profit margin (defined as revenues less
cost of sales items) for fiscal 2003 totaled $32.6 million (31.3% of revenues)
compared to $35.7 million (29.0% of revenues) for fiscal 2002, a decrease in
gross profit dollars of $3.1 million or 8.7%. The higher gross profit as a
percent to revenue (a 2.3% increase) can be attributed to informal
restructuring plans and cost containment programs implemented in fiscal 2001
and 2002 as well as the Companys Board of Directors decision to approve a
formal business restructuring plan in July 2002. The multi-year plan includes a
series of initiatives to improve gross margins as well as operating income and
reduce debt. The initiatives that impacted gross margins included the
following:



| |  |  | Closure of under-performing offices. At the end of fiscal
2001, we closed five under-performing offices. Costs continued to be
incurred in fiscal 2002 as we restructured our operations.
Approximately $0.4 million in margin costs were incurred in fiscal
2002 while none were incurred in fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2002 we
closed our office in Taiwan and realized gross margin improvement of
$0.4 million in fiscal 2003.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | Improved insurance programs. We moved certain insurance
policies to deductible programs in fiscal 2003. These changes
allowed us to reduce costs by approximately $0.7 million.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|
| |  |  | Improved material purchase program. Efficiencies were achieved
in purchasing certain corrosion control materials that are sold to
our customers. Gross Margin improvement in our Material Sales Center
totaled $0.3 million in fiscal 2003.                                                                                                                                                                                   
|
| |  |  | Wage and salary freeze. We implemented a wage and salary
freeze for all employees in fiscal 2003 in order to contain costs.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

21



---



##### Table of Contents





| |  |  | Restrictions on travel and entertainment. Travel and
entertainment was restricted to essential, revenue producing
ventures.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative (S,G&A) expenses for fiscal 2003
totaled $29.8 million (28.6% of revenues), compared with $32.3 million (26.3%
of revenues) for fiscal 2002, a decrease of 7.7%. The fiscal 2003 amount of
$29.8 million includes severance and consultant expenses totaling $3.4 million.
The improvement in S,G&A was achieved in part by the implementation of
informal cost containment programs and restructuring plans in fiscal 2001 and
2002 as well as in part because of the Board of Directors approval of a formal
restructuring plan in July 2002. An activity based analysis was performed to
eliminate non-value added costs throughout the Company. Savings were achieved
through the following initiatives:



| |  |  | Reduced headcount in corporate overhead areas. Headcount was
reduced in both fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003. Savings of
approximately $4.0 million was achieved by these headcount
reductions in fiscal 2003.                                                                                                                                                               
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | Closed under performing offices. At the end of fiscal 2001, we
closed five under performing offices. Costs continued to be incurred
in fiscal 2002 as we restructured our operations. In addition, we
closed our office in Taiwan in fiscal 2002. The total S,G&A expense
reduction realized by these closures was approximately $0.4 million
in fiscal 2003.            
|
| |  |  | Restrictions on travel and entertainment as well as other
discretionary overhead costs. Travel and entertainment was
restricted to essential, revenue producing ventures. Purchase of
advertising materials, catalogs, office supplies and other
discretionary overhead items were also restricted. Total savings
achieved in fiscal 2003 was approximately $0.4 million.
|
| |  |  | Wage and salary freeze. We implemented a wage and salary
freeze for all employees in fiscal 2003 in order to contain costs.
In addition, the management incentive plan was suspended in fiscal
2003. The savings achieved in fiscal 2003 from the suspension of the
management incentive plan was approximately $0.4 million.                                            

In addition to the initiatives above, we achieved a savings from reduced
employee benefit costs. In fiscal 2003, the Company suspended its match
feature in its 401K plan. In addition, the Company had a favorable claims
experience in its health care costs. These items resulted in savings of
approximately $0.9 million in fiscal 2003.

Operating Income (Loss)

Operating income for fiscal 2003 totaled $2.8 million, compared to $3.4
million for fiscal 2002, a decrease of $0.6 million. However, despite a
reduction in revenue of $18.9 million from fiscal 2002, our efforts to
restructure the Company and reduce our operating costs and expenses kept
operating income as a percent to revenue even with fiscal 2002.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for fiscal 2003 totaled $5.9 million, compared to $5.1
million for fiscal 2002. The increase was related primarily to a provision for
yield maintenance of $1.0 million in our Senior Notes. See Note 3, Long-Term
Debt, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

22



---



##### Table of Contents



Income Tax Provision

We recorded an income tax benefit of $0.3 million for fiscal 2003,
compared to an income tax provision of $10.7 million in fiscal 2002. Our
effective rate is based on the statutory rates in effect in the countries in
which we operate. See Note 5, Income Taxes, Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 8 for a reconciliation of our effective tax rates.
Within the fiscal 2002 tax provision is an increase in valuation allowance for
our domestic deferred tax asset of $10.5 million.

Loss from Continuing Operations

As a result of the foregoing, loss from continuing operations in fiscal
2003 totaled $2.8 million, compared with a loss from continuing operations of
$12.3 million in fiscal 2002, a decrease of $9.5 million. The decrease is
primarily attributable to the valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets
taken in fiscal 2002 and lower operating costs and expenses.

Discontinued Operations

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes totaled $9.9
million for fiscal 2003, compared with a loss from discontinued operations, net
of income taxes, of $5.9 million for fiscal 2002. This incremental loss is
mainly attributable to currency translation adjustments, pension liability and
impairment charges.

In fiscal 2003 four non-strategic business units were sold for a gain, net
of taxes of $2.1 million.

Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle

During fiscal 2003, the Company, with the assistance of independent
valuation experts, completed its initial assessment test and concluded that
certain of its goodwill was impaired. Effective April 1, 2002, the Company has
recognized a transitional impairment charge of $18.2 million as the cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle to reduce the carrying values of
certain indefinite lived intangible assets and goodwill to estimated fair
values as required by SFAS No. 142. This is a non-cash charge and does not
impact compliance with the financial covenants contained in our lender
agreements.

Net Loss

The net loss for fiscal 2003 totaled $28.8 million, compared with a net
loss of $18.2 million in fiscal 2002. The net loss increase reflects the impact
of the change in accounting principle and increased losses from discontinued
operations due to currency translation adjustments. Diluted loss per share
increased to a loss of $3.43 in fiscal 2003 compared with a loss of $2.24 in
fiscal 2002.

Year Ended March 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2001

Revenues

Revenues for fiscal 2002 totaled $123.1 million, compared with $120.5
million for fiscal 2001, an increase of 2.2%.

Fiscal 2002 revenues relating to our Domestic Core Operations segment
totaled $101.8 million, compared to $96.2 million in fiscal 2001, an increase
of 5.8%. Revenues continued to increase for our coatings services business,
which was partially offset by declines in our core cathodic protection business
as a result of the sluggish energy-related markets. Revenues from government
contract awards totaled approximately $10.0 million during fiscal 2002.

Revenues relating to our Canadian Operations segment totaled $21.3
million, compared to $24.3 million in fiscal 2002, a decrease of 12.3%. This
decrease was primarily due to lower levels of construction and material
revenues.

23



---



##### Table of Contents



Gross Profit

On a consolidated basis, gross profit (defined as revenues less cost of
sales items) for fiscal 2002 totaled $35.7 million (29.0% of revenues) compared
to $35.2 million (29.2% of revenues) for fiscal 2001, an increase in gross
profit dollars of $0.5 million or 1.4%. Included in fiscal 2002 was $1.0
million of expenses for the cessation of certain Mexican foundry operations.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative (S,G&A) expenses for fiscal 2002
totaled $32.3 million (26.3% of revenues), compared with $35.5 million (29.5%
of revenues) for fiscal 2001, a decrease of 9.0%. In fiscal 2001 S,G&A
expenses included $1.9 million for the disposition of a small non-core business
unit, the consolidation of district offices, severance pay and other costs
associated with the Companys cost reduction programs and expenses accrued in
connection with state regulatory proceedings and anti-trust litigation
involving the Company. See Item 3  Legal Proceedings for a discussion of
the ongoing regulatory and litigation matters.

Operating Income (Loss)

Operating income for fiscal 2002 totaled $3.4 million, compared to an
operating loss of $0.4 million during fiscal 2001, an increase of $3.8 million.
The increase is the result of a number of cost reduction programs we
implemented in the latter part of fiscal 2001 and our continuing efforts to
reduce our S,G&A expenses.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for fiscal 2002 totaled $5.1 million compared to $4.4
million in fiscal 2001. The decrease in debt year-over-year was offset by
increased interest rates in the latter fiscal year.

Income Tax Provision

We recorded an income tax provision of $10.7 million for fiscal 2002,
compared to an income tax benefit of $0.9 million for fiscal 2001. Within the
fiscal 2002 tax provision is an increase in valuation allowance for our
domestic deferred tax asset of $10.5 million. Our effective rate is based on
the statutory rates in effect in the countries in which we operate. See Note
5, Income Taxes, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8
for a reconciliation of our effective tax rates.

Loss from Continuing Operations

As a result of the foregoing, loss from continuing operations in fiscal
2002 totaled $12.3 million, compared with a loss from continuing operations of
$3.8 million in fiscal 2001, a decrease of $8.5 million. The decrease is
primarily attributable to the valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets
taken in fiscal 2002 which was partially offset by our reduction in S,G&A
expense.

Discontinued Operations

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes totaled $5.9
million for fiscal 2002, compared with a loss from discontinued operations of
$4.4 million for fiscal 2001. The fiscal 2002 loss included a loss on
investment in our Australian subsidiary of $2.5 million.

Net Loss

As a result of the foregoing, net loss for fiscal 2002 totaled $18.2
million, compared with a net loss of $8.3 million in fiscal 2001, an increase
of $9.9 million. The increase is primarily attributable to the valuation
allowance for our deferred tax assets taken in fiscal 2002 which was partially
offset by our reduction in S,G&A. Diluted loss per share increased to a loss
of $2.24 in fiscal 2002 compared with a loss of $1.07 in fiscal 2001.

24



---



##### Table of Contents



Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2003, we had a working capital
deficit of $28.1 million,
compared to a deficit of $40.9 million at March 31, 2002, an improvement of
$12.8 million. This improvement in working capital is due to a number of
factors. Accounts receivable decreased by $5.8 million due to lower revenue
levels in fiscal 2003 and improved collections. On March 31, 2003 we sold a
non-strategic business unit and recorded a $6.2 million note receivable, which increased
working capital. Inventory levels decreased approximately $1.8
million due to improved inventory management. The current portion of long term
debt decreased by $11.5 million. The reduction in debt is primarily the result
of the use of cash generated by continuing and discontinued operations including $3.1
million in proceeds received from the sale of our Bass Trigon Software
business. Accounts payable decreased $1.4 million due to lower activity levels
in fiscal 2003.

During fiscal 2003, cash provided by
operating activities totaled $0.2
million, compared to $9.4 million in fiscal 2002. The overall decrease in cash
generated from operating activities is due to several factors. First, we
recorded a note receivable of $6.2 million on March 31, 2003 for the sale of a
non-strategic business unit. A cash payment of approximately $6.0 million of this note was
received on April 2, 2003. This timing of the payment impacted the cash generated by
operating activities by $6.0 million due to the note receivable being recorded on
March 31, 2003. The second factor is that the Company experienced less
favorable improvements in account receivables, inventory and prepaid expenses
in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002.

In March 1999, the Company entered into an $80 million revolving credit
facility that expires on July 31, 2003 (the Revolving Credit Facility).
Initial borrowings were used to repay existing domestic bank indebtedness.
Through a series of subsequent amendments, including an amendment executed by
the Company on September 23, 2002 (September 2002 Amendment) the size of the
Revolving Credit Facility was reduced to $37.5 million. In addition, the
September 2002 Amendment provides that any cash proceeds from the disposition
of targeted Company assets will be used to reduce the Revolving Credit
Facility and the Senior Notes in a ratio of 56% and 44%, respectively. Any
net asset disposition payments to reduce the Revolving Credit Facility will
result in a proportionate reduction in the lenders commitments in the
Revolving Credit Facility. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are
further limited to borrowing base amounts as defined. The September 2002
Amendment provides for interest on borrowings at prime plus 5.00%. In
addition, the September 2002 Amendment requires the Company to pay a facility
fee of 1.00% on the commitment amount. The Company executed another amendment
on November 1, 2002 (the Seventh Amendment) which contained additional
provisions for the improvement period and also reset the net worth covenant.
The Company also executed an amendment on February 10, 2003 (the Eighth
Amendment) to modify certain terms and conditions under which facility
letters of credit may be issued.

In connection with the September 2002 Amendment, the Revolving Credit
Facility lender group received a warrant (Revolving Credit Facility Warrant)
to purchase 467,000 of the Companys common shares at a purchase price of
$0.01 per share exercisable at any time after July 31, 2003 until September
23, 2012. The Revolving Credit Facility Warrant can be reduced up to 50% if
the Company partially pays the Revolving Credit Facility principal amount
prior to July 31, 2003 or by up to 10% if targeted asset dispositions are
completed and the proceeds are used to pay down the debt levels but this is
highly unlikely to be fully utilized by July 31, 2003. Borrowings under the
Revolving Credit Facility are secured by the Companys domestic accounts
receivable, inventories, certain intangibles, machinery and equipment and
owned real estate as well as certain assets in Canada. The Company also has
pledged slightly less than two-thirds of the capital stock of two of its
foreign subsidiaries. The Revolving Credit Facility, as amended, requires the
Company to maintain certain financial ratios and places limitations on the
Companys ability to pay cash dividends, incur additional indebtedness and
make investments, including acquisitions. The Company was not in compliance
with its net worth covenant and its operating income before depreciation and
amortization financial covenant of the Revolving Credit Facility as of March
31, 2003 and there can be no assurance that the Company will receive a waiver
for these violations. At March 31, 2003, the Company had $22.2 million
outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. Total availability under the
Revolving Credit Facility at March 31, 2003 was approximately $1.6 million,
after giving consideration to the borrowing base limitations under the
Revolving Credit Facility but this availability can be revoked at any time due
to the debt covenant violations.

25



---



##### Table of Contents



Due to the fact that the Companys Revolving Credit Facility expires on
July 31, 2003, it will be necessary for the Company to amend this Revolving
Credit Facility to extend the expiration date. If the Company is unable to
negotiate an amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility, it will be necessary
for the Company to refinance or repay this debt. The Company cannot assure
that it will be able to accomplish such a transaction on terms acceptable to
the Company or at all. Failure to do so would have a material adverse effect
on the Companys liquidity and financial condition and could result in the
Companys inability to operate as a going concern. If the Company is unable
to operate as a going concern, it may file, or may have no alternative but to
file, bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings or pursue a sale or sales of assets
to satisfy creditors.

In January 1998, the Company issued, through a private placement, $30
million of Senior Notes due 2008 (the Senior Notes). The Senior Notes, as
amended, bear interest at 11.35% until July 31, 2003 and 11.85% on and after
July 31, 2003. In addition, the agreement relating to the Senior Notes, as
amended, provides for an additional fee of 1.00% per annum on the outstanding
principal amount of the Senior Notes. In connection with the September 2002
Amendment, the Senior Notes lender received a warrant (Senior Notes Warrant)
to purchase 467,000 of the Companys Common Shares at a purchase price of
$0.01 per share exercisable at any time after July 31, 2003 until September
23, 2012. The Senior Notes Warrant can be reduced up to 50% to the extent the
Company partially pays the Revolving Credit Facility principal and the Senior
Notes principal prior to July 31, 2003 or by up to 10% if targeted asset
dispositions are completed and the proceeds are used to pay down the debt
levels but this is highly unlikely to be fully utilized by July 31, 2003. The
Senior Notes, as amended, require a principal payment of $7.6 million by July
31, 2003 and monthly principal payments of $0.4 million commencing on August
15, 2003 (Notes Principal Repayments) and are secured equally and ratably
with debt under the Revolving Credit Facility. In addition, the Senior Notes
provide that any cash proceeds from the disposition of targeted Company assets
will be used to reduce the Revolving Credit Facility and the Senior Notes in a
ratio of 56% and 44%, respectively. Any such additional payments used to
reduce the Senior Notes will result in an equal reduction in the Notes
Principal Repayments. The Company cannot assure that it will be able to make
Notes Principal Repayments when due. Failure to do so would result in a
default under the Senior Notes, in which case, the Senior Notes lender could
pursue its remedies for default, including acceleration of principal, which
would have a material adverse effect on the Companys liquidity and financial
condition and could result in the Companys inability to operate as a going
concern. If the Company is unable to operate as a going concern, it may file,
or may have no alternative but to file, bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings
or pursue a sale or sales of assets to satisfy creditors.

Within the Prudential Senior Notes Agreement is a yield maintenance amount
provision which ensures that the lender is paid the entire interest amount of
the note. The make-whole provision states that the Notes shall be subject to
prepayment, in whole at any time or from time to time in part, at the option of
the Company, at 100% of the principal amount so prepaid plus interest thereon
to the prepayment date and the yield maintenance amount, if any, with respect
to each Note. Any partial prepayment of the Notes which meets certain criteria
shall be applied against the principal amount of the Notes scheduled to become
due in the inverse order of maturity thereof. Fiscal 2003 results include an
interest charge of approximately $1.0 million relating to the yield maintenance
amount provisions of our Senior Notes agreement. The yield maintenance amount
provisions apply to certain optional prepayments of principle under the Senior
Notes. The Company does not agree with and is disputing the Note holders
interpretation that certain payments from the proceeds of sales of certain
non-core and international business assets made during and after fiscal 2003
are subject to the yield maintenance amount provisions. Further information
about the yield maintenance amount provisions is included in Note 3, Long-Term
Debt, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.

During fiscal 2003, four non-strategic business units were sold. These
dispositions included Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Bass Trigon Software and two
smaller international offices. The proceeds from these dispositions were used
to pay down debt. For further information about our discontinued operations
see Note 2, Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The Company is required to maintain certain financial ratios under the
Senior Notes. The Company was not in compliance with the financial covenants
under the Senior Notes as of March 31, 2003 and there can be no assurance that
the Company will receive a waiver for these violations.

26



---



##### Table of Contents



The Company is negotiating agreements with its lenders to amend the
current Revolving Credit Facility and Senior Note agreements and to address
existing violations. In addition to other terms and conditions, we expect to
incur interest rates on borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility at a
higher applicable margin than under its existing provisions. We also intend to
seek during fiscal 2004 other financing to retire the Senior Notes and
Revolving Credit Facility. There can be no assurance however that we will be
able to amend the existing agreements or obtain other financing.

Effects of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. Statement No. 143
requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset
retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability
is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes the cost by increasing the
carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is
accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost is
depreciated over the remaining useful life of the related asset. Upon
settlement of the liability, the entity either settles the obligation for the
amount recorded or incurs a gain or loss. Statement No. 143 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002 (i.e. our fiscal year 2004). The
adoption of SFAS No. 143 is not expected to have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations or financial position.

In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs
associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee
Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain
Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit and
disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002.

In December 2002, SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
CompensationTransition and Disclosurean amendment of FASB Statement No.
123 was issued. SFAS No. 148 amends FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for an
entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value based method of accounting
for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in
both annual and interim financial statements about the effects on reported net
income of an entitys method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation. SFAS No. 148 is effective for the Company in its second fiscal
quarter of 2003. The Company does not intend to effect a voluntary change in
accounting to the fair value method, and accordingly, does not anticipate the
adoption of SFAS No. 148 to have a significant impact on the Companys future
results of operations or financial position. The Company has adopted the
disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 as of March 31, 2003.

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133
on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and in May 2003 SFAS No. 150
was issued, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics
of both Liabilities and Equity. We have not yet determined the impact, if any,
on our financial statements of SFAS No. 149 and SFAS No. 150, which are
effective in our fiscal year 2004.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others. Interpretation 45 expands on the
accounting guidance of Statements No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies, No. 57
Related Party Disclosures, and No. 107 Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments and incorporates without change the provisions of
Interpretation No. 34 Disclosure in Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5 which is being superceded.
Interpretation 45 elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for most
guarantees, including loan guarantees such as standby letters of credit. It
also clarifies that at the time an entity issues a guarantee, the entity must
recognize an initial liability for the fair value, or market value, of the
obligations it assumes under that guarantee and must disclose that information
in its interim and annual financial statements. The initial recognition and
measurement provisions of Interpretation 45 apply on a prospective basis to
guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, regardless of an
entitys year-end. The disclosure requirements of Interpretation 45 are
effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after
December 15, 2002. Accordingly, the

27



---



##### Table of Contents



Company adopted the disclosure requirements of Interpretation 45 for the
year ended March 31, 2003 and the interpretation in its entirety as of January
1, 2003. The adoption of Interpretation 45 did not have a material impact on
the Companys results of operations or financial position.

28



---



##### Table of Contents






ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk Disclosures

In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to continuing
fluctuations in foreign currency values and interest rates that can affect the
cost of operating and financing.

Interest Rate Risk

Our primary interest rate risk exposure results from our Revolving Credit
Facility, Senior Notes and various smaller lines of credit that we maintain
with foreign banks. If interest rates were to increase 200 basis points (2%)
from March 31, 2003 rates, and assuming no changes in debt from the March 31,
2003 levels, the additional annual interest expense would be approximately $1.0
million.

Foreign Operations and Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Our foreign subsidiaries generally conduct business in local currencies.
During fiscal 2003, the Company recorded a favorable foreign currency
translation adjustment of $1.6 million in equity related to net assets located
outside the United States. This foreign currency translation adjustment
resulted primarily from the weakening of the United States dollar in relation
to the Canadian dollar. Our foreign operations are also subject to other
customary risks of operating in a global environment, such as unstable
political situations, the affect of local laws and taxes, tariff increases and
regulations and requirements for export licenses, the potential imposition of
trade or foreign exchange restrictions and transportation delays. We have
international operations excluding those in Canada that are reported as net
assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets and these assets can be
effected by foreign currency exchange risk that could effect the selling price
of these assets. Also during fiscal 2003, discontinued operations recorded
charges to selling, general and administrative expenses totaling $3.7 million
related to currency translation.

29



---



##### Table of Contents






ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Accountants

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Corrpro Companies, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Corrpro
Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries (Company) as of March 31, 2003 and 2002, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2003.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Corrpro
Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in
note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, at March 31, 2003, the Company
has suffered recurring losses from operations and was not in compliance with
certain financial covenants contained in its banking agreements. These matters
raises substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going
concern. Managements plan in regard to these matters is also described in note
3. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

As discussed in note 1, to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements, effective April 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
June 20, 2003

30



---



##### Table of Contents



CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, 2003 and 2002

(In Thousands)

ASSETS

|                               |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |      |         |         |        | 
|------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------- | ------ | ------- | ------ | ---- | ------- | ------- | ------ | 
|                               |                                                                                                                       |                      |        | 2003    |        | 2002
|                               |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |     
|Current Assets:                |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                               | Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                             |                      | $      | 5,514   |        |      | $       | 3,959   |       
|                               | Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $531 and $1,779 at March 31, 2003
and 2002, respectively |                      |        | 16,809  |        |      |         | 22,575  |       
|                               | Note receivable                                                                                                       |                      |        | 6,232   |        |      |         |        |       
|                               | Inventories                                                                                                           |                      |        | 7,066   |        |      |         | 8,469   |       
|                               | Prepaid expenses and other                                                                                            |                      |        | 3,713   |        |      |         | 3,371   |       
|                               | Assets held for sale                                                                                                  |                      |        | 14,600  |        |      |         | 40,936  |       
|                               |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                               |                                                                                                                       | Total current assets |        |         | 53,934 |      |         |         | 79,310 | 
|                               |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |      |         |        
|Property, Plant and Equipment: |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                               | Land                                                                                                                  |                      |        | 443     |        |      |         | 592     |       
|                               | Buildings and improvements                                                                                            |                      |        | 4,897   |        |      |         | 6,158   |       
|                               | Equipment, furniture and fixtures                                                                                     |                      |        | 15,312  |        |      |         | 15,030  |       
|                               |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                               |                                                                                                                       |                      | 20,652 |         |        |      | 21,780  |        
|                               | Less accumulated depreciation                                                                                         |                      |        | (13,969 | )      |      |         | (13,389 | )     
|                               |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                               | Property, plant and equipment, net                                                                                    |                      |        | 6,683   |        |      |         | 8,391   |       
|                               |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |      |         |        
|Other Assets:                  |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                               | Goodwill, net                                                                                                         |                      |        | 13,343  |        |      |         | 18,859  |       
|                               | Deferred income taxes                                                                                                 |                      |        |        |        |      |         |        |       
|                               | Other assets                                                                                                          |                      |        | 3,023   |        |      |         | 3,403   |       
|                               |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                               |                                                                                                                       | Total other assets   |        |         | 16,366 |      |         |         | 22,262 | 
|                               |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                               |                                                                                                                       | $                    | 76,983 |         |        | $    | 109,963 |        
|                               |                                                                                                                       |                      |        |         |        |      |         |        

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these statements.

31



---



##### Table of Contents



CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, 2003 and 2002

(In Thousands)

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY

|                                       |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            |        |         |        |      |         |         |        | 
|-------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------- | ------ | ------- | ------ | ---- | ------- | ------- | ------ | 
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            |        | 2003    |        | 2002
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            |        |         |        |     
|Current Liabilities:                   |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                                       | Short-term borrowings                                                                                                                                                     |                            | $      | 61      |        |      | $       |        |       
|                                       | Current portion of long-term debt                                                                                                                                         |                            |        | 50,415  |        |      |         | 61,668  |       
|                                       | Accounts payable                                                                                                                                                          |                            |        | 7,282   |        |      |         | 8,636   |       
|                                       | Accrued liabilities and other                                                                                                                                             |                            |        | 9,671   |        |      |         | 9,009   |       
|                                       | Liabilities held for sale                                                                                                                                                 |                            |        | 7,236   |        |      |         | 5,153   |       
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                                           | Total current liabilities  |        |         | 74,665 |      |         |         | 84,466 | 
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            |        |         |        |      |         |        
|Long-Term Debt, net of current portion |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            | 765    |         |        |      | 1,018   |        
|Deferred Income Taxes                  |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            | 354    |         |        |      | 622     |        
|Commitments and Contingencies          |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            |       |         |        |      |        |        
|Shareholders Equity:                  |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                                       | Serial Preferred Shares, voting, no par value;
1,000 shares authorized and unissued                                                                                       |                            |        |        |        |      |         |        |       
|                                       | Common Shares, voting, no par value, at stated value;
40,000 shares authorized; 8,538
shares issued in 2003 and 2002; 8,439 and
8,288 shares outstanding in 2003 and 2002 |                            |        | 2,276   |        |      |         | 2,276   |       
|                                       | Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                                                                |                            |        | 46,560  |        |      |         | 46,993  |       
|                                       | Accumulated earnings (deficit)                                                                                                                                            |                            |        | (45,076 | )      |      |         | (16,251 | )     
|                                       | Accumulated other comprehensive loss                                                                                                                                      |                            |        | (1,597  | )      |      |         | (7,002  | )     
|                                       | Common Shares in treasury, at cost; 99
and 250 shares held in 2003 and 2002                                                                                               |                            |        | (964    | )      |      |         | (2,159  | )     
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                                           | Total shareholders equity |        |         | 1,199  |      |         |         | 23,857 | 
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            |        |         |        |      |         |        
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                                           | $                          | 76,983 |         |        | $    | 109,963 |        
|                                       |                                                                                                                                                                           |                            |        |         |        |      |         |        

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these statements.

32



---



##### Table of Contents



CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |        |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | - | ------- | ------ | ---- | - | ------- | ------ | - | - | ------- | ------ | -
|                                                                |                                              |   | 2003    |        | 2002 |   | 2001   
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |        
|Revenues                                                        |                                              | $ | 104,220 |        |      | $ | 123,058 |        |   | $ | 120,489 |       
|Operating costs and expenses:                                   |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|                                                                | Cost of sales                                |   |         | 71,607 |      |   |         | 87,326 |   |   |         | 85,325 |  
|                                                                | Selling, general and administrative expenses |   |         | 29,788 |      |   |         | 32,327 |   |   |         | 35,535 |  
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Operating income (loss)                                         |                                              |   | 2,825   |        |      |   | 3,405   |        |   |   | (371    | )     
|Interest expense                                                |                                              |   | 5,907   |        |      |   | 5,055   |        |   |   | 4,401   |       
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Loss from continuing operations before
Income taxes             |                                              |   | (3,082  | )      |      |   | (1,650  | )      |   |   | (4,772  | )     
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                            |                                              |   | (331    | )      |      |   | 10,669  |        |   |   | (934    | )     
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Loss from continuing operations                                 |                                              |   | (2,751  | )      |      |   | (12,319 | )      |   |   | (3,838  | )     
|Discontinued operations:                                        |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|                                                                | Loss from operations, net of income taxes    |   |         | (9,931 | )    |   |         | (5,898 | ) |   |         | (4,443 | )
|                                                                | Gain on disposals, net of income taxes       |   |         | 2,095  |      |   |         |       |   |   |         |       |  
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Loss before Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |                                              |   | (10,587 | )      |      |   | (18,217 | )      |   |   | (8,281  | )     
|Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle             |                                              |   | (18,238 | )      |      |   |        |        |   |   |        |       
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Net Loss                                                        |                                              | $ | (28,825 | )      |      | $ | (18,217 | )      |   | $ | (8,281  | )     
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Loss per share  Basic:                                         |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|                                                                | Loss from continuing operations              |   | $       | (0.33  | )    |   | $       | (1.52  | ) |   | $       | (0.50  | )
|                                                                | Discontinued operations:                     |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |        |  
|                                                                | Loss from operations, net of income taxes    |   |         | (1.18  | )    |   |         | (0.72  | ) |   |         | (0.57  | )
|                                                                | Gain on disposal, net of income taxes        |   |         | 0.25   |      |   |         |       |   |   |         |       |  
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Loss before Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |                                              |   | (1.26   | )      |      |   | (2.24   | )      |   |   | (1.07   | )     
|Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle             |                                              |   | (2.17   | )      |      |   |        |        |   |   |        |       
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Net Loss                                                        |                                              | $ | (3.43   | )      |      | $ | (2.24   | )      |   | $ | (1.07   | )     
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Weighted average shares outstanding  Basic                     |                                              |   | 8,387   |        |      |   | 8,119   |        |   |   | 7,736   |       
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Loss per share  Diluted:                                       |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|                                                                | Loss from continuing operations              |   | $       | (0.33  | )    |   | $       | (1.52  | ) |   | $       | (0.50  | )
|                                                                | Discontinued operations:                     |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |        |  
|                                                                | Loss from operations, net of income taxes    |   |         | (1.18  | )    |   |         | (0.72  | ) |   |         | (0.57  | )
|                                                                | Gain on disposal, net of income taxes        |   |         | 0.25   |      |   |         |       |   |   |         |       |  
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Loss before Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |                                              |   | (1.26   | )      |      |   | (2.24   | )      |   |   | (1.07   | )     
|Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle             |                                              |   | (2.17   | )      |      |   |        |        |   |   |        |       
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Net Loss                                                        |                                              | $ | (3.43   | )      |      | $ | (2.24   | )      |   | $ | (1.07   | )     
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       
|Weighted average shares outstanding  Diluted                   |                                              |   | 8,387   |        |      |   | 8,119   |        |   |   | 7,736   |       
|                                                                |                                              |   |         |        |      |   |         |        |   |   |         |       

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these statements.

33



---



##### Table of Contents



CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Years Ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(In Thousands)

|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        |             |        |        |   |   |        |         |         |         |   | 
|------------------------------- | ------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | - | - | --------- | ----- | ------ | - | ------- | ------ | ---------- | - | ------ | ------- | -------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | - | ------ | ----------- | ------ | ------ | - | - | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | - | 
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        | Accumulated |        |        |   |   |        |         |         |        
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        | Other       |        |        |   |   |        |         |         |        
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        | Compre-     |        | Common |   |   |        |        
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   | Serial    |       |        |   |         |        | Additional |   | Accum- |         | hensive  |         | Shares |        |   |        |            
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   | Preferred |       | Common |   | Paid-In |        | ulated     |   | Income |         | In       |         |        |        |  
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   | Shares    |       | Shares |   | Capital |        | Earnings   |   | (Loss) |         | Treasury |         | Total 
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |       
|March 31, 2000                  |                                 | $                                                                         |     |   |   | $         | 2,276 |        |   | $       | 51,486 |            |   | $      | 10,247  |          |         | $      | (1,699 | ) |        | $           | (8,075 | )      |   | $ | 54,235 |        
|Comprehensive Loss:             |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        |             |        |        |   |   |        |        
|                                |                                 | Net loss                                                                  |      |   |  |           |       |        |  |         |        |            |  |        |         |          | (8,281  | )      |        |   |       |             |        |        |  |   |        |         | (8,281  | )      
|                                |                                 | Minimum pension liability, net of
tax of $142                             |      |   |  |           |       |        |  |         |        |            |  |        |         |          |        |        |        |   | (366   | )           |        |        |  |   |        |         | (366    | )      
|                                |                                 | Cumulative translation
adjustment                                         |      |   |  |           |       |        |  |         |        |            |  |        |         |          |        |        |        |   | (4,614 | )           |        |        |  |   |        |         | (4,614  | )      
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        |             |        |        |   |   |        |        
|                                | Total Comprehensive             |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        |             |        |        |   |   |        |         |        
|                                |                                 |                                                                           | Loss |   |   |          |       |        |   |        |        |            |   |       |         |          |         |       |        |   |        |            |        |        |   |  |        |         |         | (13,261 | )
|Exercise of 2 stock options     |                                 |                                                                           |     |   |   |           |      |        |   |         | 4      |            |   |        |        |          |         |        |       |   |        |             |       |        |   |   | 4      |        
|Issuance of 208 Treasury Shares |                                 |                                                                           |     |   |   |           |      |        |   |         | (1,511 | )          |   |        |        |          |         |        |       |   |        |             | 2,051  |        |   |   | 540    |        
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        |             |        |        |   |   |        |        
|March 31, 2001                  |                                 |                                                                           |     |   |   |           | 2,276 |        |   |         | 49,979 |            |   |        | 1,966   |          |         |        | (6,679 | ) |        |             | (6,024 | )      |   |   | 41,518 |        
|Comprehensive Loss:             |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        |             |        |        |   |   |        |        
|                                |                                 | Net loss                                                                  |      |   |  |           |       |        |  |         |        |            |  |        |         |          | (18,217 | )      |        |   |       |             |        |        |  |   |        |         | (18,217 | )      
|                                |                                 | Minimum pension liability, net of
tax of $74                              |      |   |  |           |       |        |  |         |        |            |  |        |         |          |        |        |        |   | (132   | )           |        |        |  |   |        |         | (132    | )      
|                                |                                 | Cumulative translation adjustment                                         |      |   |  |           |       |        |  |         |        |            |  |        |         |          |        |        |        |   | (191   | )           |        |        |  |   |        |         | (191    | )      
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        |             |        |        |   |   |        |        
|                                | Total Comprehensive Loss        |                                                                           |      |  |   |           |       |       |   |         |        |           |   |        |         |         |         |        |        |  |        |             |        |       |   |   |        | (18,540 | )      
|                                | Issuance of 391 Treasury Shares |                                                                           |     |   |   |           |      |        |   |         | (2,986 | )          |   |        |        |          |         |        |       |   |        |             | 3,865  |        |   |   | 879    |        
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        |             |        |        |   |   |        |        
|March 31, 2002                  |                                 |                                                                           |     |   |   |           | 2,276 |        |   |         | 46,993 |            |   |        | (16,251 | )        |         |        | (7,002 | ) |        |             | (2,159 | )      |   |   | 23,857 |        
|                                | Comprehensive Loss:             |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        |             |        |        |   |   |        |         |        
|                                |                                 | Net loss                                                                  |      |   |  |           |       |        |  |         |        |            |  |        |         |          | (28,825 | )      |        |   |       |             |        |        |  |   |        |         | (28,825 | )      
|                                |                                 | Write-off Translation adjustment
related to Discontinued operations       |      |   |  |           |       |        |  |         |        |            |  |        |         |          |        |        |        |   | 3,301  |             |        |        |  |   |        |         | 3,301   |        
|                                |                                 | Write-off of minimum pension liability
related to Discontinued operations |      |   |  |           |       |        |  |         |        |            |  |        |         |          |        |        |        |   | 498    |             |        |        |  |   |        |         | 498     |        
|                                |                                 | Cumulative translation adjustment                                         |      |   |  |           |       |        |  |         |        |            |  |        |         |          |        |        |        |   | 1,606  |             |        |        |  |   |        |         | 1,606   |        
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        |             |        |        |   |   |        |        
|                                | Total Comprehensive Loss        |                                                                           |      |  |   |           |       |       |   |         |        |           |   |        |         |         |         |        |        |  |        |             |        |       |   |   |        | (23,420 | )      
|                                | Issuance of 934 Stock Warrants  |                                                                           |      |  |   |           |       |       |   |         |        | 626        |   |        |         |         |         |        |        |  |        |             |        |       |   |   |        | 626     |        
|                                | Issuance of 151 Treasury Shares |                                                                           |      |  |   |           |       |       |   |         |        | (1,059     | ) |        |         |         |         |        |        |  |        |             |        | 1,195  |   |   |        | 136     |        
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        |             |        |        |   |   |        |        
|March 31, 2003                  |                                 | $                                                                         |     |   |   | $         | 2,276 |        |   | $       | 46,560 |            |   | $      | (45,076 | )        |         | $      | (1,597 | ) |        | $           | (964   | )      |   | $ | 1,199  |        
|                                |                                 |                                                                           |      |   |   |           |       |        |   |         |        |            |   |        |         |          |         |        |        |   |        |             |        |        |   |   |        |        

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these statements.

34



---



##### Table of Contents



CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(In Thousands)

|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |        |        |        |       |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ----- | ------- | ------- | ----- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ----- | -
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        | 2003  |         | 2002    |       | 2001  
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |       
|Cash flows from operating activities:                                        |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|                                                                             | Net loss                                                                                |                                                     | $                                     | (28,825                                           | )      |       | $       | (18,217 | )     |        | $      | (8,281 | )     
|                                                                             | Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash provided (used) by continuing operations: |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |        |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         | Loss on discontinued operations                     |                                       |                                                   | 7,836  |       |         |         | 5,898 |        |        |        | 4,443  |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         | Depreciation and amortization                       |                                       |                                                   | 3,027  |       |         |         | 4,142 |        |        |        | 4,201  |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         | 401K matching contributions in Treasury shares      |                                       |                                                   | 136    |       |         |         | 841   |        |        |        | 360    |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         | Deferred income taxes                               |                                       |                                                   | (344   | )     |         |         | 6,737 |        |        |        | (2,576 | )     
|                                                                             |                                                                                         | Loss on sale of assets                              |                                       |                                                   | (11    | )     |         |         | (87   | )      |        |        | (82    | )     
|                                                                             |                                                                                         | Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |                                       |                                                   | 18,238 |       |         |         |      |        |        |        |       |       
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
net of effects of acquisitions: |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     | Accounts and notes receivable         |                                                   |        | 176   |         |         |       | 4,898  |        |        |        | (3,417 | )    
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     | Inventories                           |                                                   |        | 1,752 |         |         |       | 4,323  |        |        |        | 625    |      
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     | Prepaid expenses and other            |                                                   |        | (314  | )       |         |       | 2,821  |        |        |        | 2,153  |      
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     | Other assets                          |                                                   |        | (698  | )       |         |       | (1,174 | )      |        |        | 1,228  |      
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     | Accounts payable and accrued expenses |                                                   |        | (744  | )       |         |       | (832   | )      |        |        | 699    |      
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       | Total adjustments                                 |        |       | 29,054  |         |       |        | 27,567 |        |        |        | 7,634 |  
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       | Net cash provided (used) by continuing operations |        |       | 229     |         |       |        | 9,350  |        |        |        | (647  | )
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|Cash flows from investing activities:                                        |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|                                                                             | Additions to property, plant and equipment                                              |                                                     |                                       | (351                                              | )      |       |         | (588    | )     |        |        | (1,882 | )     
|                                                                             | Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment                                 |                                                     |                                       | 507                                               |        |       |         | 495     |       |        |        | 1,510  |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       | Net cash provided (used) by investing activities  |        |       | 156     |         |       |        | (93    | )      |        |        | (372  | )
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|Cash flows from financing activities:                                        |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|                                                                             | Net payment under revolving credit facility and
lines of credit                         |                                                     |                                       | (11,534                                           | )      |       |         | (5,362  | )     |        |        | 6,588  |       
|                                                                             | Net proceeds from issuance of Common Shares                                             |                                                     |                                       |                                                  |        |       |         | 40      |       |        |        | 183    |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       | Net cash provided (used) by financing activities  |        |       | (11,534 | )       |       |        | (5,322 | )      |        |        | 6,771 |  
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|Effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on cash                 |                                                                                         |                                                     | 154                                   |                                                   |        |       | (5      | )       |       |        | (11    | )     
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|Cash provided by (used for) discontinued operations                          |                                                                                         |                                                     | 12,550                                |                                                   |        |       | (3,174  | )       |       |        | (3,022 | )     
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|Net increase in cash                                                         |                                                                                         |                                                     | 1,555                                 |                                                   |        |       | 756     |         |       |        | 2,719  |       
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year                               |                                                                                         |                                                     | 3,959                                 |                                                   |        |       | 3,203   |         |       |        | 484    |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of year                                     |                                                                                         | $                                                   | 5,514                                 |                                                   |        | $     | 3,959   |         |       | $      | 3,203  |       
|                                                                             |                                                                                         |                                                     |                                       |                                                   |        |       |         |         |       |        |        |       

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these statements.

35



---



##### Table of Contents



CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Consolidation and basis of presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Corrpro
Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company). All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain fiscal 2002 and 2001 amounts have been reclassified to conform with the
fiscal 2003 presentation.

The Companys operations provide corrosion control engineering and
services, systems and equipment to the infrastructure, environmental and energy
markets throughout the world.

In July 2002, the Companys Board of Directors approved a formal business
restructuring plan. The multi-year plan includes a series of initiatives to
improve operating income and reduce debt. The Company intends to sell non-core
business units and use the proceeds to reduce debt. The Company has engaged
outside professionals to assist in the disposition of the domestic and
international non-core business units. Prior to the quarter ended September
30, 2002, the Companys non-core domestic and international units were reported
as the Other Operations and International Operations reporting segments.
Effective as of the quarter ended September 30, 2002, the Other Operations and
the International Operations reporting segments have been eliminated and the
non-core domestic and international units are reported as discontinued
operations. Prior-year financial statements have been reclassified to reflect
these non-core units as discontinued operations, which are also referred to as
assets and liabilities held for sale.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid investments
with an original maturity of three months or less.

Accounts receivable

The Company records estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts
receivable based upon the number of days the accounts are past due, the current
business environment and specific information such as bankruptcy or liquidity
issues of customers. Historically, losses for uncollectible accounts
receivable have been within managements estimates. Corrosion control services
and products are provided to a large number of customers with no substantial
concentration in a particular industry or with an individual customer. The
Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers financial
condition.

Accounts receivable are presented net of allowances for doubtful accounts
of $531 and $1,779 at March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Bad debt expense
totaled $452, $532 and $813 in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Trade receivables written off, net of recoveries of prior years
write-offs, totaled $1,700, $873 and $393 in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market with cost being
determined on the first-in, first-out method. Inventories consist of the
following at March 31, 2003 and 2002:

36



---



##### Table of Contents



|                                  |  |      |       |      |  |   |       | 
|--------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- |  | - | ----- | 
|                                  |  | 2003 |       | 2002
|                                  |  |      |       |     
|Component parts and raw materials |  | $    | 5,005 |      |  | $ | 5,624 | 
|Finished goods                    |  |      | 2,061 |      |  |   | 2,845 | 
|                                  |  |      |       |      |  |   |       | 
|                                  |  | $    | 7,066 |      |  | $ | 8,469 | 
|                                  |  |      |       |      |  |   |       | 

Disposals of obsolete inventory, net of proceeds, totaled $149, $183 and
$1,728 in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Major renewals and
improvements are capitalized, while maintenance and repairs are expensed when
incurred. The cost and accumulated depreciation for property, plant and
equipment sold, retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the accounts
and resulting gains or losses are reflected in income.

Substantially all of the Companys operations compute depreciation on the
straight-line method. Depreciation for the Companys Canadian Operations
segment is computed on the declining balance method. Estimated useful lives
range from 25 to 40 years for buildings and from 4 to 10 years for equipment,
furniture and fixtures. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the term
of the lease. For income tax reporting purposes, depreciation is computed
principally using accelerated methods.

Depreciation expense totaled $1,937, $2,429 and $2,593 in fiscal 2003,
2002 and 2001, respectively.

Goodwill, patents and other intangibles

In June 2001, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141,
Business Combinations (SFAS 141), and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), were
issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. SFAS 141 eliminates the
pooling-of-interests method for business combinations and requires the use of
the purchase method and establishes criteria to be used in determining whether
acquired intangible assets are to be separated from goodwill.

In July 2001, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), were issued by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board. SFAS 142 changes the accounting for
goodwill and indefinite life intangibles from an amortization approach to a
non-amortization approach, and require periodic tests for impairment of these
assets. Upon the Companys adoption of SFAS 142 on April 1, 2002, the
provisions of SFAS 142 required the discontinuance of amortization of goodwill
and indefinite life intangibles that had been recorded in connection with
previous business combinations. The Company has completed its initial
impairment testing as of April 1, 2002 under SFAS 142 and recorded an
impairment loss totaling $18,238 of which $11,832 related to discontinued
operations and $6,406 related to continuing operations. The loss is being
recognized as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. This
impairment testing is also done annually in the fourth quarter and such testing
indicated no additional impairment as of March 31, 2003.

The following table reflects the reconciliation of reported net loss and
net loss per share to the amounts adjusted for the exclusion of goodwill
amortization:

|                                           |                   |   |         |       |      |   |        |       |  
|------------------------------------------ | ----------------- | - | ------- | ----- | ---- | - | ------ | ----- | -
|                                           |                   |   | 2002    |       | 2001
|                                           |                   |   |         |       |     
|Net Loss:                                  |                   |   |         |       |      |   |        |      
|Reported Net Loss                          |                   | $ | (18,217 | )     |      | $ | (8,281 | )    
|Add back Goodwill Amortization             |                   |   | 1,723   |       |      |   | 1,668  |      
|                                           |                   |   |         |       |      |   |        |      
|Adjusted Net Loss                          |                   | $ | (16,494 | )     |      | $ | (6,613 | )    
|                                           |                   |   |         |       |      |   |        |      
|Income (loss) per share  Basic & Diluted: |                   |   |         |       |      |   |        |      
|                                           | As reported       |   | $       | (2.24 | )    |   | $      | (1.07 | )
|                                           | Adjusted Net Loss |   | $       | (2.03 | )    |   | $      | (0.85 | )

37



---



##### Table of Contents



Goodwill balances as of March 31, 2003 totaled $13,343 compared to $18,859
at March 31, 2002. During fiscal 2003, the Company recorded an impairment on
its goodwill of $11,832 for discontinued operations and $6,406 for its
continuing operations which was offset by Canadian foreign currency translation
adjustments.

In determining the fair value of the reporting units for SFAS 142, the
Company uses the income approach, market approach and the allocation of market
capitalization as its measures of valuation to periodically review the
impairment of goodwill.

Included in other assets are amortizable assets consisting primarily of
patents, trademarks and covenants not to compete. Such assets, with a net book
value of $1,083 and $1,279 at March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, are
amortized on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging
from 4 to 20 years. Amortization expense for such assets totaled $217, $227
and $381 in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Amortization expense is
anticipated to be approximately $217 for each of the next five fiscal years.

The Company uses an undiscounted cash flow method to periodically review
the net realizable value of other intangible assets and believes that such
assets are realizable.

Fair value of financial instruments

The recorded value of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables,
accrued liabilities, short-term borrowings and assets and liabilities held for
sale approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these
instruments. The recorded value of the Companys long-term debt is considered
to approximate fair value based on the borrowing rates currently available to
the Company for loans with similar terms and maturities.

Revenue recognition

The Company records income from construction and engineering contracts
under the percentage-of- completion method, using costs incurred to date in
relation to estimated total costs of the contracts, to measure the stage of
completion. Original contract prices are adjusted for change orders and claims
when the change order or claim has been approved by the customer. Cost budgets
are revised, when necessary, in the amounts that are reasonably estimated based
on the Project Leaders knowledge of the project as well as the Companys
historical experience. The cumulative effects of changes in estimated total
contract costs and revenues are recorded in the period in which the facts
requiring such revisions become known, and are accounted for using the
percentage-of-completion method. At the time it is determined that a contract
is expected to result in a loss, the entire estimated loss is recorded.
Accounts receivable includes $1,218 and $1,059 at March 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively, of amounts billed but not paid by customers under retainage
provisions of contracts. Prepaid expenses and other includes $1,987 and $2,286
at March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, of amounts related to costs and
estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts. Accrued
liabilities and other includes $477 and $343 at March 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively, of amounts related to billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts. The Company recognizes revenue from product
sales upon shipment and transfer of ownership.

Product development expenses

Expenditures for product development costs were minimal in fiscal 2003 and
2002 and amounted to approximately $700 in fiscal 2001.

38



---



##### Table of Contents



Warranties

In the normal course of business, we provide warranties and
indemnifications for our products and services. We provide warranties that the
products we distribute are in compliance with prescribed specifications. In
addition, we have indemnity obligations to our customers for these products,
which have also been provided to us from our suppliers, either through express
agreement or by operation of law.

At March 31, 2003, warranty costs were not material to the consolidated
financial statements.

Income taxes

The Company uses the liability method whereby income taxes are recognized
during the fiscal year in which transactions enter into the determination of
financial statement income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between
financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities. The Company
recorded a valuation allowance for its net domestic deferred tax assets and net
operating loss carryforwards of $10,472 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002.
The Company intends to maintain a full valuation allowance for its net deferred
tax assets until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of
the remaining reserve. Until such time, except for foreign and state tax
provisions, the Company will have no reported tax provision, net of changes in
the valuation allowance. In the event the Company was to determine, based on
the existence of sufficient positive evidence, that it would be able to realize
its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount, an
adjustment to the valuation allowance would increase income in the period such
determination was made. See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements of the Company for additional information regarding income taxes.

Earnings per share

Basic Earnings Per Share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income (loss)
for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for
the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted average number of common shares and potential shares outstanding for
the period. Stock options and warrants are the only potential common shares
and are considered in the Companys diluted EPS calculation. Potential common
shares are computed using the treasury stock method. The effect of the 45 and
28 incremental shares stock options in fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively, have
been excluded from dilutive weighted average shares, as the net loss for the
year would cause the incremental shares to be antidilutive. Moreover, the
effect of the 477 weighted average incremental shares from the issuance of
stock warrants in fiscal 2003, respectively, have been excluded from dilutive
weighted average shares, as the net loss for the year would cause the
incremental shares to be antidilutive.

Comprehensive income (loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is reported separately from
retained earnings and additional paid-in-capital in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Items considered to be other comprehensive income (loss) include
adjustments made for foreign currency translation (under SFAS No. 52) and
pensions (under SFAS No. 87).

Components of other accumulated comprehensive income (loss) consist of
the following:

|                       |  |           |        |           |  |   |        |  
|---------------------- |  | --------- | ------ | --------- |  | - | ------ | -
|                       |  | March 31, |        | March 31,
|                       |  | 2003      |        | 2002     
|                       |  |           |        |          
|Translation adjustment |  | $         | (1,597 | )         |  | $ | (6,504 | )
|Pensions               |  |           |       |           |  |   | (498   | )
|                       |  |           |        |           |  |   |        |  
|Ending Balance         |  | $         | (1,597 | )         |  | $ | (7,002 | )
|                       |  |           |        |           |  |   |        |  

39



---



##### Table of Contents



Components of comprehensive income (loss) consist of the following:

|                                                                    |  |                               |         |      |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                    |  | Twelve Months Ended March 31,
|                                                                    |  |                              
|                                                                    |  | 2003                          |         | 2002
|                                                                    |  |                               |         |     
|Net loss                                                            |  | $                             | (28,825 | )    |  | $ | (18,217 | )
|Other Comprehensive income (loss):                                  |  |                               |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Translation adjustment                                              |  |                               | 1,606   |      |  |   | (191    | )
|Pensions                                                            |  |                               |        |      |  |   | (132    | )
|Write-off translation adjustment related
to discontinued operations |  |                               | 3,301   |      |  |   |        |  
|Write-off pensions related to discontinued
operations               |  |                               | 498     |      |  |   |        |  
|                                                                    |  |                               |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Total comprehensive loss                                            |  | $                             | (23,420 | )    |  | $ | (18,540 | )
|                                                                    |  |                               |         |      |  |   |         |  

Foreign currency translation

The functional currency of each foreign subsidiary is the respective local
currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at the year-end exchange rates
and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the
period. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
shareholders equity in other comprehensive income (loss). The Companys
foreign assets held for sale are effected by currency fluctuations. For
discontinued operations, the effects of foreign currency translations have been
reflected in the statement of operations.

Financial statement estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures.
Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Stock-based compensation

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation in that it requires
additional disclosures about our stock-based compensation plans. SFAS No. 148
is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2002. We account for our
stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method of recognition
and measurement principles under APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. We adopted the
disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123. Assuming that we had accounted for
our stock-based compensation programs using the fair value method promulgated
by SFAS No. 123, proforma net loss and net loss per share would have been as
follows (for the fiscal years ended):

|                                                     |             |  |      |        |      |  |      |         |   |  |   |        |  
|---------------------------------------------------- | ----------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- |  | ---- | ------- | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                     |             |  | 2003 |        | 2002 |  | 2001
|                                                     |             |  |      |        |      |  |     
|Loss from continuing operations:                     |             |  |      |        |      |  |      |         |   |  |   |       
|                                                     | As reported |  | $    | (2,751 | )    |  | $    | (12,319 | ) |  | $ | (3,838 | )
|                                                     | Pro forma   |  |      | (3,007 | )    |  |      | (12,498 | ) |  |   | (4,245 | )
|Loss from continuing operations per share  Basic:   |             |  |      |        |      |  |      |         |   |  |   |       
|                                                     | As reported |  | $    | (0.33  | )    |  | $    | (1.52   | ) |  | $ | (0.50  | )
|                                                     | Pro forma   |  |      | (0.36  | )    |  |      | (1.54   | ) |  |   | (0.55  | )
|Loss from continuing operations per share  Diluted: |             |  |      |        |      |  |      |         |   |  |   |       
|                                                     | As reported |  | $    | (0.33  | )    |  | $    | (1.52   | ) |  | $ | (0.50  | )
|                                                     | Pro forma   |  |      | (0.36  | )    |  |      | (1.54   | ) |  |   | (0.55  | )

40



---



##### Table of Contents



All options were granted at an exercise price equal to the market price of
the Companys common stock at the date of the grant. The weighted-average fair
value price at the date of grant for options granted during fiscal 2003, 2002
and 2001 was $0.32, $3.70 and $3.75 per option, respectively. For purposes of
this pro forma, the fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The significant
assumptions used were risk-free interest rates ranging from 3.3% to 6.5%,
expected volatility of 142.0% for 2003, 113.5% for 2002 and 46.5% for 2001, an
expected life of 10 years and no expected dividends.

2. ASSETS AND LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE

In July 2002, the Companys Board of Directors approved a formal business
restructuring plan. The multi-year plan includes a series of initiatives to
improve operating income and reduce debt. The Company intends to sell non-core
business units and use the proceeds to reduce debt. The Company has engaged
outside professionals to assist in the disposition of the domestic and
international non-core business units. Prior to the quarter ended September
30, 2002, the Companys non-core domestic and international units were reported
as the Other Operations and International Operations reporting segments.
Effective for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, the Other Operations and
the International Operations reporting segments have been eliminated and the
non-core domestic and international units are reported as discontinued
operations. Prior-year financial statements have been reclassified to reflect
these non-core units as discontinued operations, which are also referred to as
assets and liabilities held for sale.

Assets and liabilities held for sale consisted of the following at March 31,

|                                   |  |      |        |      |  |   |        | 
|---------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------ | 
|                                   |  | 2003 |        | 2002
|                                   |  |      |        |     
|Cash                               |  | $    | 2,819  |      |  | $ | 1,796  | 
|Accounts Receivable                |  |      | 6,203  |      |  |   | 15,291 | 
|Inventory                          |  |      | 2,348  |      |  |   | 6,097  | 
|Prepaid Expenses                   |  |      | 2,135  |      |  |   | 365    | 
|Property, plant and equipment, net |  |      | 58     |      |  |   | 1,851  | 
|Goodwill and Other Assets          |  |      | 1,037  |      |  |   | 15,536 | 
|                                   |  |      |        |      |  |   |        | 
|Assets held for sale               |  | $    | 14,600 |      |  | $ | 40,936 | 
|                                   |  |      |        |      |  |   |        | 
|Current Liabilities                |  | $    | 7,310  |      |  | $ | 5,151  | 
|Deferred Taxes & Minority Interest |  |      | (74    | )    |  |   | 2      | 
|                                   |  |      |        |      |  |   |        | 
|Liabilities held for sale          |  | $    | 7,236  |      |  | $ | 5,153  | 
|                                   |  |      |        |      |  |   |        | 

Operating gains or losses may be experienced with the disposition of the
non-core assets at the time of disposal during implementation of the
restructuring plan. Statements of operations for the discontinued operations
for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are shown below.

|                                                      |                                            |   |                                       |        |      |   |        |        |  |   |        |        | 
|----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | - | ------------------------------------- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ | ------ |  | - | ------ | ------ | 
|                                                      |                                            |   | For the Twelve Months Ended March 31,
|                                                      |                                            |   |                                      
|                                                      |                                            |   | 2003                                  |        | 2002 |   | 2001  
|                                                      |                                            |   |                                       |        |      |   |       
|Revenues                                              |                                            | $ | 40,309                                |        |      | $ | 49,133 |        |  | $ | 43,448 |       
|Operating cost and expenses:                          |                                            |   |                                       |        |      |   |        |        |  |   |        |       
|                                                      | Cost of sales                              |   |                                       | 26,817 |      |   |        | 34,708 |  |   |        | 31,409 | 
|                                                      | Selling, general & administrative expenses |   |                                       | 20,919 |      |   |        | 17,435 |  |   |        | 13,625 | 
|                                                      |                                            |   |                                       |        |      |   |        |        |  |   |        |       
|Operating loss                                        |                                            |   | (7,427                                | )      |      |   | (3,010 | )      |  |   | (1,586 | )     
|Gain on disposal                                      |                                            |   | (2,095                                | )      |      |   |       |        |  |   |       |       
|Interest expense                                      |                                            |   | 2,455                                 |        |      |   | 2,298  |        |  |   | 2,354  |       
|                                                      |                                            |   |                                       |        |      |   |        |        |  |   |        |       
|Loss from discontinued operations
before income taxes |                                            |   | (7,787                                | )      |      |   | (5,308 | )      |  |   | (3,940 | )     
|Provision for income taxes                            |                                            |   | 49                                    |        |      |   | 590    |        |  |   | 503    |       
|                                                      |                                            |   |                                       |        |      |   |        |        |  |   |        |       
|Loss from discontinued operations                     |                                            | $ | (7,836                                | )      |      | $ | (5,898 | )      |  | $ | (4,443 | )     
|                                                      |                                            |   |                                       |        |      |   |        |        |  |   |        |       

41



---



##### Table of Contents



The Company allocated interest to discontinued operations of $2,455,
$2,298 and $2,354 for fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, based on
estimated proceeds from the discontinued operations dispositions that will be
used to pay down the Revolving Credit Facility and Senior Notes (see Note 3 -
Long-Term Debt). The interest rate used to calculate the interest expense
allocated was the weighted average interest rate of the Revolving Credit
Facility and Senior Notes.

During fiscal 2003, the Company disposed of four non-strategic business
units. First, in March 2003, the Company sold its Bass Trigon Software
division for $3,150 and recognized a gain of $194. Also, in March 2003, the
Company recorded a note receivable for $6,232, of which the Company has
collected $5,932 on April 2, 2003, for its Rohrback Cosasco Systems division
and recognized a gain of $1,809. The Company also disposed of two smaller
international offices with a net gain of $92 during fiscal 2003. The net
proceeds from dispositions were used to pay down debt.

During fiscal 2003, the Company recorded an impairment charge relating to
its Asia Pacific operations totaling $1,575 based on current market value of
these operations and additionally recorded impairment charges totaling $900
based on market value analysis for its European operations and its Middle East
operations. Also during fiscal 2003, discontinued operations recorded charges
to selling, general and administrative expenses totaling $3,661 related to
currency translation.

3.     Long-Term Debt:

Long-term debt at March 31, 2003 and 2002 consisted of the following:

|                          |  |      |        |      |  |   |        | 
|------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------ | 
|                          |  | 2003 |        | 2002
|                          |  |      |        |     
|Senior Notes, due 2008    |  | $    | 26,824 |      |  | $ | 28,286 | 
|Revolving Credit Facility |  |      | 22,192 |      |  |   | 32,045 | 
|Other                     |  |      | 2,225  |      |  |   | 2,355  | 
|                          |  |      |        |      |  |   |        | 
|                          |  |      | 51,241 |      |  |   | 62,686 | 
|Less: current portion     |  |      | 50,476 |      |  |   | 61,668 | 
|                          |  |      |        |      |  |   |        | 
|                          |  | $    | 765    |      |  | $ | 1,018  | 
|                          |  |      |        |      |  |   |        | 

In March 1999, the Company entered into an $80 million revolving credit
facility that expires on July 31, 2003 (the Revolving Credit Facility).
Initial borrowings were used to repay existing domestic bank indebtedness.
Through a series of subsequent amendments, including an amendment executed by
the Company on September 23, 2002 (September 2002 Amendment), the size of
the Revolving Credit Facility was reduced to $37.5 million. In addition, the
September 2002 Amendment provides that any cash proceeds from the disposition
of targeted Company assets will be used to reduce the Revolving Credit
Facility and the Senior Notes in a ratio of 56% and 44%, respectively. Any
net asset disposition payments to reduce the Revolving Credit Facility will
result in a proportionate reduction in the lenders commitments in the
Revolving Credit Facility. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are
further limited to borrowing base amounts as defined. The September 2002
Amendment provides for interest on borrowings at prime plus 5.00%. In
addition, the September 2002 Amendment requires the Company to pay a facility
fee of 1.00% on the commitment amount. The Company executed another amendment
on November 1, 2002 (the Seventh Amendment) which contained additional
provisions for the improvement period and also reset the net worth covenant.
The Company

42



---



##### Table of Contents



also executed an amendment on February 10, 2003 (the Eighth Amendment)
to modify certain terms and conditions under which facility letters of credit
may be issued.

In connection with the September 2002 Amendment, the Revolving Credit
Facility lender group received a warrant (Revolving Credit Facility Warrant)
to purchase 467 of the Companys common shares at a purchase price of $0.01
per share exercisable at any time after July 31, 2003 until September 23,
2012. The Revolving Credit Facility Warrant can be reduced up to 50% if the
Company partially pays the Revolving Credit Facility principal amount prior to
July 31, 2003 or by up to 10% if targeted asset dispositions are completed and
the proceeds are used to pay down the debt levels but this is highly unlikely
to be fully utilized by July 31, 2003. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit
Facility are secured by the Companys domestic accounts receivable,
inventories, certain intangibles, machinery and equipment and owned real
estate as well as certain assets in Canada. The Company also has pledged
slightly less than two-thirds of the capital stock of two of its foreign
subsidiaries. The Revolving Credit Facility, as amended, requires the Company
to maintain certain financial ratios and places limitations on the Companys
ability to pay cash dividends, incur additional indebtedness and make
investments, including acquisitions. The Company was not in compliance with
its net worth covenant and its operating income before depreciation and
amortization financial covenant of the Revolving Credit Facility as of March
31, 2003 and there can be no assurance that the Company will receive a waiver
for these violations. At March 31, 2003, the Company had $22,192 outstanding
under the Revolving Credit Facility. Total availability under the Revolving
Credit Facility at March 31, 2003 was approximately $1,552, after giving
consideration to the borrowing base limitations, under the Revolving Credit
Facility but this availability can be revoked at any time due to the debt
covenant violations.

Due to the fact that the Companys Revolving Credit Facility expires on
July 31, 2003, it will be necessary for the Company to amend this Revolving
Credit Facility to extend the expiration date. If the Company is unable to
negotiate an amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility, it will be necessary
for the Company to refinance or repay this debt. The Company cannot assure
that it will be able to accomplish such a transaction on terms acceptable to
the Company or at all. Failure to do so would have a material adverse effect
on the Companys liquidity and financial condition and could result in the
Companys inability to operate as a going concern. If the Company is unable
to operate as a going concern, it may file, or may have no alternative but to
file, bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings or pursue a sale or sales of assets
to satisfy creditors.

The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the Revolving
Credit Facility was 9.5%, 9.2% and 9.6% during fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.

In January 1998, the Company issued, through a private placement, $30
million of Senior Notes due 2008 (the Senior Notes). The Senior Notes, as
amended, bear interest at 11.35% until July 31, 2003 and 11.85% on and after
July 31, 2003. In addition, the agreement relating to the Senior Notes, as
amended, provides for an additional fee of 1.00% per annum on the outstanding
principal amount of the Senior Notes. In connection with the September 2002
Amendment, the Senior Notes lender received a warrant (Senior Notes Warrant)
to purchase 467 of the Companys Common Shares at a purchase price of $0.01
per share exercisable at any time after July 31, 2003 until September 23,
2012. The Senior Notes Warrant can be reduced up to 50% to the extent the
Company partially pays the Revolving Credit Facility principal and the Senior
Notes principal prior to July 31, 2003 or by up to 10% if targeted asset
dispositions are completed and the proceeds are used to pay down the debt
levels but this is highly unlikely to be fully utilized by July 31, 2003. The
Senior Notes, as amended, require a principal payment of $7,561 by July 31,
2003 and monthly principal payments of $384 commencing on August 15, 2003
(Notes Principal Repayments) and are secured equally and ratably with debt
under the Revolving Credit Facility. In addition, the Senior Notes provide
that any cash proceeds from the disposition of targeted Company assets will be
used to reduce the Revolving Credit Facility and the Senior Notes in a ratio
of 56% and 44%, respectively. Any such additional payments used to reduce the
Senior Notes will result in an equal reduction in the Notes Principal
Repayments. The Company cannot assure that it will be able to make Notes
Principal Repayments when due. Failure to do so would result in a default
under the Senior Notes, in which case, the Senior Notes lender could pursue
its remedies for default, including acceleration of principal, which would
have a material adverse effect on the Companys liquidity and financial
condition and could result in the Companys inability to operate as a going
concern. If the Company is unable to operate as a going concern, it may file,
or may have no alternative but to file, bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings
or pursue a sale or sales of assets to satisfy creditors.

43



---



##### Table of Contents



Within the Prudential Senior Notes Agreement is a yield maintenance amount
provision which ensures that the lender is paid the entire interest amount of
the note. The make-whole provision states that the Notes shall be subject to
prepayment, in whole at any time or from time to time in part, at the option of
the Company, at 100% of the principal amount so prepaid plus interest thereon
to the prepayment date and the yield maintenance amount, if any, with respect
to each Note. Any partial prepayment of the Notes which meets certain criteria
shall be applied against the principal amount of the Notes scheduled to become
due in the inverse order of maturity thereof. Fiscal 2003 results include an
interest charge of approximately $1,045 relating to the yield maintenance
amount provisions of our Senior Notes agreement. The yield maintenance amount
provisions apply to certain optional prepayments of principle under the Senior
Notes. The Company does not agree with and is disputing the Note holders
interpretation that certain payments from the proceeds of sales of certain
non-core and international business assets made during and after fiscal 2003
are subject to the yield maintenance amount provisions.

The Company is required to maintain certain financial ratios under the
Senior Notes. The Company was not in compliance with the financial covenants
under the Senior Notes as of March 31, 2003 and there can be no assurance that
the Company will receive a waiver for these violations.

The Company intends to seek, prior to July 31, 2003, other financing to
retire the Senior Notes and the Revolving Credit Facility or will seek to get
an extension. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be
able to obtain other financing or if obtained, what the terms and conditions
would be.

The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the Senior Notes
was 11.35%, 9.1% and 9.1% during fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Other long-term debt bears interest at various rates, which was 6.2% at
March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2002. The obligations mature at various intervals
between 2003 and 2007.

The Companys long-term debt excluding the Revolving Credit Facility and
the Senior Notes, matures as follows: $340 in 2005, $340 in 2006 and $85 in
2007.

The Company also maintains available lines of credit from various foreign
banks which are secured by the assets of certain foreign subsidiaries.
Short-term borrowings amounted to $61 and $0 at March 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively, under these lines of credit. The interest rate on such
borrowings at March 31, 2003 was 5.0%.

Cash paid for interest totaled $6,090, $6,633 and $5,687 for fiscal year
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Fiscal 2003 cash paid for interest included
facility commitments fees of $336.

In July 2002, with the assistance of strategic financial advisors, the
Company developed a formal business restructuring plan. The multi-year plan
includes a series of initiatives to improve operating income and reduce debt
through restructuring, consolidation and divestiture of non-core businesses.
Operating gains or losses may be experienced with the disposition of assets at
the time of disposal during the implementation of the restructuring plan.
Operating income improvements combined with debt reductions are expected to
result. Implementation efforts are currently underway. As appropriate, the
Company will report future quarterly and annual results separately for
continuing operations and for discontinued operations.

The Company has retained an investment banking firm to assist in its
efforts to recapitalize its balance sheet and refinance its currently
outstanding Senior Notes and Revolving Credit Facility. The refinancing
process is ongoing and the Company is currently having discussions with various
parties in order to effect a refinancing transaction. There can be no
assurance, however, that the Company will be able to obtain other financing or
as to the terms and conditions under which such financing may be available.

The Company is currently in default of certain financial ratios required
to be maintained under it Senior Note and Revolving Credit Facility agreements.
In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility is scheduled to expire on July 31, 2003

44



---



##### Table of Contents



and the Company is required to make a $7.6 million principal payment on the
Senior Notes by July 31, 2003. The Company is also, at the current time, not
able to provide any assurances regarding its ability to make the $7.6 million
Senior Note principal payment that is due on July 31, 2003. Further
information about Long-Term Debt is included in Note 3, Long-Term Debt, Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements included in item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The Company has had preliminary discussions with its lenders regarding an
amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility which would, among other things,
extend the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility beyond July 31, 2003.
The Company intends to continue its efforts to obtain such an amendment,
however, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to negotiate
such an amendment at all or under terms and conditions acceptable to it.

Until such time when the Company is able to refinance the Senior Notes and
Revolving Credit Facility it will attempt to negotiate arrangement with its
lenders to, among other things, waive the covenant violations under the Senior
Notes and Revolving Credit Facility agreement, extend the maturity of the
Revolving Credit Facility beyond July 31, 2003 and defer the principal payments
due under the Senior Notes. If the Company is not able to negotiate mutually
acceptable arrangements with its existing lenders, events could occur that
would have a material adverse effect on the Companys liquidity and financial
condition and could result in its inability to operate as a going concern. If
the Company is unable to operate as a going concern, it may file, or have no
alternative but to file, bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings or pursue a sale
or sales of assets to satisfy creditors.

4. Leases:

The Company leases certain office and warehouse space and equipment under
operating leases which expire at various dates through 2012. Future minimum
rental payments under long-term lease agreements are as follows: $2,291 in
2004, $1,703 in 2005, $1,139 in 2006, $629 in 2007, $375 in 2008 and $575 after
2009 with a cumulative total of $6,712. In addition, the Company rents other
properties on a month-to-month basis.

Total rental expense was $4,685, $3,819 and $3,393 for fiscal 2003, 2002
and 2001, respectively.

5. Income Taxes:

Components of income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
as follows:

|              |  |      |        |      |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- |  | ---- | ------ | - |  | - | ------ | -
|              |  | 2003 |        | 2002 |  | 2001
|              |  |      |        |      |  |     
|United States |  | $    | (4,633 | )    |  | $    | (3,294 | ) |  | $ | (7,542 | )
|Foreign       |  |      | 1,551  |      |  |      | 1,644  |   |  |   | 2,770  |  
|              |  |      |        |      |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|              |  | $    | (3,082 | )    |  | $    | (1,650 | ) |  | $ | (4,772 | )
|              |  |      |        |      |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  

Components of the provision for income taxes for continuing operations by jurisdiction follow:

|         |  |                   |      |      |      |      |        |       |       |   |        |        |       |  
|-------- |  | ----------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------ | ----- | ----- | - | ------ | ------ | ----- | -
|         |  |                   |      | 2003 |      | 2002 |        | 2001 
|         |  |                   |      |      |      |      |        |      
|Current  |  |  Federal         |      | $    |     |      |        | $     |      |   |        | $      | 333   |  
|         |  |  State and local |      |      | 120  |      |        |       |      |   |        |        | 11    |  
|         |  |  Foreign         |      |      | 79   |      |        |       | 1,132 |   |        |        | 1,225 |  
|         |  |                   |      |      |      |      |        |       |       |   |        |       
|         |  |                   | 199  |      |      |      | 1,132  |       |       |   | 1,569  |       
|Deferred |  |  Federal         |      |     |      |      |        | 9,351 |       |   |        | (2,502 | )    
|         |  |  State and local |      |      |     |      |        |       | (56   | ) |        |        | (508  | )
|         |  |  Foreign         |      |      | (530 | )    |        |       | 242   |   |        |        | 507   |  
|         |  |                   |      |      |      |      |        |       |       |   |        |       
|         |  |                   | (530 | )    |      |      | 9,537  |       |       |   | (2,503 | )     
|         |  |                   |      |      |      |      |        |       |       |   |        |       
|         |  | $                 | (331 | )    |      | $    | 10,669 |       |       | $ | (934   | )     
|         |  |                   |      |      |      |      |        |       |       |   |        |       

45



---



##### Table of Contents



Differences between the statutory United States federal income tax rate
(34%) and the effective income tax rate for continuing operations are as follows:

|                                                         |  |      |        |      |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- |  | ---- | ------ | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                         |  | 2003 |        | 2002 |  | 2001
|                                                         |  |      |        |      |  |     
|Federal income tax provision (benefit)
at statutory rate |  | $    | (1,048 | )    |  | $    | (561   | ) |  | $ | (1,622 | )
|State income taxes, net                                  |  |      | 78     |      |  |      | (36    | ) |  |   | (323   | )
|Foreign tax rate differential                            |  |      | 146    |      |  |      | 725    |   |  |   | 698    |  
|Meals and entertainment                                  |  |      | 169    |      |  |      | 178    |   |  |   | 195    |  
|Valuation allowance                                      |  |      | 364    |      |  |      | 10,472 |   |  |   |       |  
|Other                                                    |  |      | (40    | )    |  |      | (109   | ) |  |   | 118    |  
|                                                         |  |      |        |      |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Effective income tax                                     |  | $    | (331   | )    |  | $    | 10,669 |   |  | $ | (934   | )
|                                                         |  |      |        |      |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  

Temporary differences and carryforwards which give rise to deferred tax
assets and liabilities were comprised of the following at March 31, 2003 and
2002:

|                    |                                         |                           |   |       |        |      |   |       |        | 
|------------------- | --------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | - | ----- | ------ | ---- | - | ----- | ------ | 
|                    |                                         |                           |   | 2003  |        | 2002
|                    |                                         |                           |   |       |        |     
|Deferred Tax Assets |                                         |                           |   |       |        |      |   |      
|                    | Bad debts                               |                           | $ | 208   |        |      | $ | 550   |       
|                    | Other accruals                          |                           |   | 860   |        |      |   | 1,118 |       
|                    | Uniform cost capitalization             |                           |   | 9     |        |      |   | 27    |       
|                    | Accrued expenses                        |                           |   | 473   |        |      |   | 648   |       
|                    | Pension and other benefit accruals      |                           |   | 428   |        |      |   | 654   |       
|                    | Minimum tax credit                      |                           |   | 557   |        |      |   | 557   |       
|                    | Federal net operating loss carryforward |                           |   | 7,060 |        |      |   | 6,665 |       
|                    | State net operating loss carryforwards  |                           |   | 772   |        |      |   | 772   |       
|                    | Other                                   |                           |   | 835   |        |      |   | 468   |       
|                    |                                         |                           |   |       |        |      |   |      
|                    |                                         | Total deferred tax assets |   |       | 11,202 |      |   |       | 11,459 | 

|                         |                               |                                |         |      |      |      |         |      |        |  
|------------------------ | ----------------------------- | ------------------------------ | ------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------- | ---- | ------ | -
|                         |                               |                                |         | 2003 |      | 2002
|                         |                               |                                |         |      |      |     
|Deferred Tax Liabilities |                               |                                |         |      |      |      |         |     
|                         | Property, plant and equipment |                                |         | (353 | )    |      |         | (680 | )     
|                         | Other                         |                                |         | (367 | )    |      |         | (929 | )     
|                         |                               |                                |         |      |      |      |         |     
|                         |                               | Total deferred tax liabilities |         |      | (720 | )    |         |      | (1,609 | )
|                         |                               |                                |         |      |      |      |         |     
|Valuation allowance      |                               |                                | (10,836 | )    |      |      | (10,472 | )   
|                         |                               |                                |         |      |      |      |         |     
|Total net deferred taxes |                               | $                              | (354    | )    |      | $    | (622    | )   
|                         |                               |                                |         |      |      |      |         |     

In fiscal 2002, the Company recorded a $10,472 charge to establish a
valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance
was calculated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 109. The Company
intends to maintain a full valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets
until sufficient positive evidence exists to support reversal of the remaining
reserve. Until such time, except for foreign and state tax provisions, the
Company expects to have no reported tax provision, net of changes in the
valuation allowance.

No income tax provision for United States income tax on approximately
$7,722 of undistributed losses of foreign subsidiaries at March 31, 2003 has
been made. Determination of the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax
liabilities for temporary differences related to investments in foreign
subsidiaries is not practicable.

The Company had state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$14,622 at March 31, 2003. At March 31, 2003, the Company had federal net
operating loss carryforwards of $20,550, which expire through 2022. The Company
also has federal credit carryforwards of $557 at March 31, 2003 relating to
non-expiring alternative minimum tax credits.

46



---



##### Table of Contents



Cash paid for income taxes totaled $371, $1,897 and $2,471 for fiscal
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

6. Employee Benefit Plans:

One of the Companys discontinued operations has a contributory defined
benefit pension plan. Employees of such foreign subsidiary no longer accrue
benefits under the plan, however, the Company continues to be obligated to fund
prior period benefits. The Company funds the plan in accordance with
recommendations from independent actuaries. Pension benefits generally depend
on length of service and job grade.

The following table sets forth the change in benefit obligation, change in
plan assets, funded status, Consolidated Balance Sheets presentation, net
periodic pension benefit cost and the relevant assumptions for the Companys
defined benefit pension plan at March 31:

2003
    
    2002Change in benefit obligation:Benefit obligation at beginning of year
    
    $
    3,816
    
    
    $
    3,651Service cost
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest cost
    
    
    249
    
    
    
    218Assumption change
    
    
    771
    
    
    
    Effects of currency translation
    
    
    398
    
    
    
    6Benefits paid
    
    
    (66
    )
    
    
    (59
    )Benefit obligation at end of year
    
    $
    5,168
    
    
    $
    3,816Change in plan assetsFair value of plan assets at beginning of year
    
    $
    3,034
    
    
    $
    2,933Employer contributions
    
    
    193
    
    
    
    137Benefits paid
    
    
    (66
    )
    
    
    (59
    )Effects of currency translation
    
    
    319
    
    
    
    6Investment return
    
    
    (449
    )
    
    
    17Fair value of plan assets at end of year
    
    $
    3,031
    
    
    $
    3,034Funded status
    
    $
    (2,137
    )
    
    $
    (782
    )Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance SheetsAccrued benefit liability (recorded in Discontinued
Operations)
    
    $
    (2,137
    )
    
    $
    (782
    )


2003
    
    2002
    
    2001Net periodic pension benefit cost Service cost
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Interest cost
    
    
    247
    
    
    
    218
    
    
    
    211Expected return on assets
    
    
    (274
    )
    
    
    (239
    )
    
    
    (256
    )Net amortization and deferral
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    Net periodic pension cost
    
    $
    11
    
    
    $
    (4
    )
    
    $
    (45
    )Weighted-average assumptions as of March 31
Discount rate
    
    
    5.0
    %
    
    
    6.0
    %
    
    
    6.5
    %Long-term rate of return on plan assets
    
    
    8.0
    %
    
    
    8.0
    %
    
    
    8.5
    %Rate of increase in compensation level
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    N/A


The Company also maintains the Corrpro Companies, Inc. 401(k) Savings
Plan for all eligible employees in the United States under Section 401(k) of
the Internal Revenue Code. The Company may, at its discretion, make
contributions to the plan. In addition, the plan permits matching
contributions. Effective October 1, 2000, the Company began matching employee
contributions with treasury shares. For fiscal year 2003 and 2002, the
Company issued 121 and 375 treasury shares for the Companys matching portion.
Total matching contributions in cash and treasury shares totaled $199, $977
and $973 in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Effective April 6,
2002, the Company suspended the Company match.

47



---



##### Table of Contents



The Company has entered into an agreement with one of its executives which
provides, among other things, that such employee shall be eligible to receive
retirement income, with a lifetime survivor benefit, in an amount equal to 50%
of base salary. The Company is providing for this deferred compensation
benefit over the term of the agreement.

7. Shareholders Equity:

Shareholder Rights Plan

On July 23, 1997, the Company adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan and
declared a dividend of one Right on each outstanding common share of the
Company. Each Right would entitle shareholders to buy, upon certain triggering
events, one one-hundredth of a newly created Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Share at an exercise price of $75 (subject to certain adjustments).
The record date for the distribution was August 7, 1997.

Subject to certain exceptions, Rights will become exercisable only after a
person or group acquires 20% or more of the Companys common shares or
announces a tender offer for 20% or more of the Companys common shares. The
Companys Board of Directors can redeem the Rights at $0.01 per Right at any
time before a person acquires 20% or more of the Companys common shares. If a
person or group acquires 20% or more of the Companys common shares, each Right
will entitle holders, other than the acquiring party, to purchase common shares
of the Company having a market value of twice the exercise price of the Right.
If, after the Rights have become exercisable, the Company merges or otherwise
combines with another entity, each Right then outstanding will entitle its
holder to purchase a number of the acquiring partys common shares having a
market value of twice the exercise price of the Right. The Plan also contains
other customary provisions and is similar to plans adopted by many other
companies. The Rights will expire in July 2007.

Warrants

During the quarter ended September 30, 2002, the Company issued warrants
to the lenders (see Note 3  Long-Term Debt) under its Revolving Credit
Facility and Senior Notes. The warrant issued to the Revolving Credit Facility
lender permits the lender to purchase 467 shares at a purchase price of $0.01
per share, and the warrant issued to the Senior Notes lender permits the lender
to purchase 467 shares at a purchase price of $0.01 per share. For purposes of
financial reporting, the warrants were valued at $313 each and the aggregate
amount of $626 increased paid-in-capital and reduced short-term and long-term
debt. The $313 discount per facility will be fully amortized by the Revolving
Credit Facility termination date of July 2003, and by the Senior Notes
termination date of January 15, 2008. Warrants have been amortized over the
life of the debt and current amortization expense for fiscal 2003 totaled $217
and is included in the interest expense in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations.

8. Stock Plans:

In June 1999, the Company adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan under
which employees have a systematic long-term investment opportunity to own
Company shares. Shareholder approval for such adoption was obtained on July 22,
1999. The Employee Stock Purchase Plan has been suspended.

The Company has options outstanding under various option plans including
the 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 1997 Option Plan) and the 1997
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (the 1997 Directors Plan). The
Companys 1994 Corrpro Stock Option Plan (the 1994 Plan) and the 1994 Corrpro
Outside Directors Stock Option Plan (the Directors Plan) were terminated
upon adoption of the 1997 Option Plan and the 1997 Directors Plan. In
addition, prior to its initial public offering in September 1993, the Company
issued stock options under various arrangements.

The 1997 Option Plan was adopted on April 28, 1997, subject to shareholder
approval, which was obtained on July 23, 1997. The 1997 Option Plan, as
amended, provides for the granting of up to 469 non-qualified stock options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards or stock bonus awards to
officers, key employees and consultants of the

48



---



##### Table of Contents



Company. In addition, the 1997
Option Plan provides that shares exercised, forfeited or otherwise terminated
under previously granted stock awards, other than awards under the 1994
Directors Plan, will also be available for grant under the new plan. The
option price per share will generally be the fair market value of the Companys
common shares on the date of grant and the term of the options will not exceed
10 years. The 1997 Option Plan will terminate on April 28, 2007. On April 30,
1998, the Company adopted an amendment to the 1997 Option Plan increasing the
number of shares available for issuance by 300.

The 1997 Directors Plan was also adopted on April 28, 1997. The 1997
Directors Plan provides for the granting of up to 63 non-qualified stock
options to current and future non-employee directors of the Company. Under
this plan, each non-employee director will annually be granted options to
purchase 3 common shares. The option price per share will be the fair market
value of the Companys common shares on the date of grant and the term of the
options will be 10 years. The 1997 Directors Plan will terminate on April 28,
2007.

In fiscal 2001, the Company adopted a plan whereby holders of stock
options covered under the 1997 Option Plan could surrender options previously
granted with the understanding that a like number of options would be granted
no sooner than six months after surrender. Accordingly, options for 654 shares
with exercise prices ranging from $5.25 to $14.96 were surrendered during
December 2000. Subsequently, in June 2001, the Company reissued options for
648 shares with a price of $2.55, the market price.

Shares for issuance under equity compensation plans does not include the
Companys 2001 Non-Employee Directors Stock Appreciation Rights Plan which has
not been approved by its shareholders. Under this plan, non-employee directors
received a one-time grant of vested stock appreciation rights as part of their
compensation for serving as directors. The stock appreciation rights entitle
each eligible director to be paid in cash, subject to the applicable terms and
conditions of the grant, on or after May 17, 2006, the amount of appreciation
in the fair market value of 10,000 Common Shares between May 17, 2001 and May
17, 2006. Currently, three such non-employee directors hold such stock
appreciation rights.

Stock option activity for the Company during fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001
was as follows:

|                                       |                                  |      |       |      |    |      |       |      |    |   |       |      |   
|-------------------------------------- | -------------------------------- | ---- | ----- | ---- | -- | ---- | ----- | ---- | -- | - | ----- | ---- | --
|Number of Shares                       |                                  | 2003 |       | 2002 |    | 2001
|                                       |                                  |      |       |      |    |     
|Options outstanding, beginning of year |                                  |      | 1,303 |      |    |      | 757   |      |    |   | 1,107 |     
|Granted                                |                                  |      | 270   |      |    |      | 676   |      |    |   | 425   |     
|Exercised                              |                                  |      |      |      |    |      |      |      |    |   | (2    | )   
|Expired, canceled or surrendered       |                                  |      | (174  | )    |    |      | (130  | )    |    |   | (773  | )   
|                                       |                                  |      |       |      |    |      |       |      |    |   |       |     
|Outstanding, end of year               |                                  |      | 1,399 |      |    |      | 1,303 |      |    |   | 757   |     
|                                       |                                  |      |       |      |    |      |       |      |    |   |       |     
|Exercisable, end of year               |                                  |      | 270   |      |    |      | 305   |      |    |   | 444   |     
|Available for grant, end of year       |                                  |      | 248   |      |    |      | 1,014 |      |    |   | 891   |     
|Price range of options:                |                                  |      |       |      |    |      |       |      |    |   |       |     
|                                       | Granted                          |      | $     | 0.32 | to |      | $     | 1.30 | to |   | $     | 3.69 | to
|                                       |                                  | $    | 1.15  |      |    | $    | 3.05  |      |    | $ | 4.00  |     
|                                       | Exercised                        |      |       | N/A  |    |      |       | N/A  |    |   | $     | 1.86 |   
|                                       | Options outstanding, end of year |      | $     | 0.32 | to |      | $     | 1.30 | to |   | $     | 1.86 | to
|                                       |                                  | $    | 13.78 |      |    | $    | 13.78 |      |    | $ | 13.78 |     

Of the options shares outstanding at March 31, 2003, 1,218 shares
outstanding were in a price range of $0.32 to $3.75. The remaining 181 options
shares outstanding were at a price range from $4.00 to $13.78.

49



---



##### Table of Contents



9. Business Segments:

In July 2002, the Companys Board of Directors approved a formal business
restructuring plan. The multi-year plan includes a series of initiatives to
improve operating income and reduce debt. The Company intends to sell non-core
business units and use the proceeds to reduce debt. The Company has engaged
outside professionals to assist in the disposition of the domestic and
international non-core business units. Prior to the quarter ended September
30, 2002, the Companys non-core domestic and international units were reported
as the Other Operations and International Operations reporting segments.
Effective as of the quarter ended September 30, 2002, the Other Operations and
the International Operations reporting segments have been eliminated and the
non-core domestic and international units are reported as discontinued
operations. Prior-year financial statements have been reclassified to reflect
these non-core units as discontinued operations, which are also referred to as
assets and liabilities held for sale.

We have organized our operations into two business segments: Domestic Core
Operations and Canadian Operations. Our business segments and a description of
the products and services they provide are described below:

The Companys business segments and a description of the products and
services they provide are described below:

Domestic Core Operations.The Domestic Core Operations segment consists of
the Companys operations in the United States and Central and South America,
which provide products and services including corrosion control, coatings,
pipeline integrity, risk assessment and inspection services. This segment
provides corrosion control products and services to a wide-range of customers
in a number of industries including: energy, utilities, water and wastewater
treatment, chemical and petrochemical, pipelines, defense and municipalities.
In addition, this segment provides coatings services to customers in the
entertainment, aerospace, transportation, petrochemical and electric power
industries, as well as inspection services to customers in the pharmaceutical,
chemical and energy industries. Finally, this segment includes a production
facility in the United States that assembles and distributes cathodic
protection products, such as anodes, primarily to the United States market.
The Domestic Core Operations products and services consisted of corrosion
control, which represented approximately 77%, 60% and 71% of revenues in fiscal
years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, coatings which represented
approximately 19%, 37% and 26% of revenues in fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively and pipeline integrity and risk assessment which represented
approximately 4%, 3% and 3% of revenues in fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. The Domestic Core Operations had goodwill totaling $6,397 as
March 31, 2003.

Canadian Operations. The Canadian Operations segment provides corrosion
control, pipeline integrity and inspection services to customers in Canada who
are primarily in the oil and gas industry. These customers include pipeline
operators, petrochemical plants and refineries. The Canadian Operations
segment also includes production facilities that assemble products such as
anodes and rectifiers. The Canadian Operations products and services consisted
of corrosion control, which represented approximately 94%, 88% and 87% of
revenues in fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively and pipeline
integrity and risk assessment which represented approximately 6%, 12% and 13%
of revenues in fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Canadian
Operations had goodwill totaling $6,946 at March 31, 2003.

Financial information relating to the Companys operations by segment are
presented below:

|                         |                                   |   |         |         |      |   |         |         |   |   |         |         |  
|------------------------ | --------------------------------- | - | ------- | ------- | ---- | - | ------- | ------- | - | - | ------- | ------- | -
|                         |                                   |   | 2003    |         | 2002 |   | 2001   
|                         |                                   |   |         |         |      |   |        
|Revenue:                 |                                   |   |         |         |      |   |         |         |   |   |         |        
|                         | Domestic Core Operations          |   | $       | 84,966  |      |   | $       | 101,781 |   |   | $       | 96,161  |  
|                         | Canadian Operations               |   |         | 19,254  |      |   |         | 21,277  |   |   |         | 24,328  |  
|                         |                                   |   |         |         |      |   |         |         |   |   |         |        
|                         |                                   | $ | 104,220 |         |      | $ | 123,058 |         |   | $ | 120,489 |        
|                         |                                   |   |         |         |      |   |         |         |   |   |         |        
|Operating Income (Loss): |                                   |   |         |         |      |   |         |         |   |   |         |        
|                         | Domestic Core Operations          |   | $       | 11,061  |      |   | $       | 13,544  |   |   | $       | 12,483  |  
|                         | Canadian Operations               |   |         | 3,634   |      |   |         | 2,850   |   |   |         | 4,193   |  
|                         | Corporate Related Costs and Other |   |         | (11,870 | )    |   |         | (12,989 | ) |   |         | (17,047 | )
|                         |                                   |   |         |         |      |   |         |         |   |   |         |        
|                         |                                   | $ | 2,825   |         |      | $ | 3,405   |         |   | $ | (371    | )      
|                         |                                   |   |         |         |      |   |         |         |   |   |         |        

50



---



##### Table of Contents



|                               |                                                 |   |        |        |   |   |         |        |   |   |        |        |  
|------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------- | - | ------ | ------ | - | - | ------- | ------ | - | - | ------ | ------ | -
|Total Assets:                  |                                                 |   |        |        |   |   |         |        |   |   |        |       
|                               | Domestic Core Operations                        |   | $      | 30,780 |   |   | $       | 45,352 |   |   |        |        |  
|                               | Canadian Operations                             |   |        | 22,669 |   |   |         | 21,588 |   |   |        |        |  
|                               | Corporate Related Assets and Other              |   |        | 8,934  |   |   |         | 2,087  |   |   |        |        |  
|                               | Assets held for Sale                            |   |        | 14,600 |   |   |         | 40,936 |   |   |        |        |  
|                               |                                                 |   |        |        |   |   |         |        |   |   |        |       
|                               |                                                 | $ | 76,983 |        |   | $ | 109,963 |        |   |   |        |       
|                               |                                                 |   |        |        |   |   |         |        |   |   |        |       
|Capital Expenditures:          |                                                 |   |        |        |   |   |         |        |   |   |        |       
|                               | Domestic Core Operations                        |   | $      | (282   | ) |   | $       | (511   | ) |   | $      | (1,317 | )
|                               | Canadian Operations                             |   |        | (48    | ) |   |         | (77    | ) |   |        | (566   | )
|                               | Corporate Related Capital Expenditures          |   |        | (21    | ) |   |         |       |   |   |        |       |  
|                               |                                                 |   |        |        |   |   |         |        |   |   |        |       
|                               |                                                 | $ | (351   | )      |   | $ | (588    | )      |   | $ | (1,882 | )     
|                               |                                                 |   |        |        |   |   |         |        |   |   |        |       
|Depreciation and Amortization: |                                                 |   |        |        |   |   |         |        |   |   |        |       
|                               | Domestic Core Operations                        |   | $      | 1,925  |   |   | $       | 2,458  |   |   | $      | 2,245  |  
|                               | Canadian Operations                             |   |        | 281    |   |   |         | 677    |   |   |        | 729    |  
|                               | Corporate Related Depreciation and Amortization |   |        | 821    |   |   |         | 1,007  |   |   |        | 1,227  |  
|                               |                                                 |   |        |        |   |   |         |        |   |   |        |       
|                               |                                                 | $ | 3,027  |        |   | $ | 4,142   |        |   | $ | 4,201  |       
|                               |                                                 |   |        |        |   |   |         |        |   |   |        |       

10. Legal Matters:

As previously reported, in January 2000, the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ) issued an administrative decision which
effectively limited the scope of MDEQs 1995 approval of certain assessment
methodologies utilized by Corrpro in determining whether certain underground
storage tanks meet Michigans regulatory requirements for upgrade by means of
cathodic protection. The MDEQ decision also would have required us to conduct
further assessments and provide certain information. The assessment
methodologies at issue have been and remain recognized by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the other states in which we utilized such
methodologies for virtually identical purposes. We believed that MDEQs
decision was in error and on January 24, 2000, filed a complaint and claim of
appeal in the Circuit Court for the County of Ingham, Michigan seeking
declaratory relief and appealing the decision on several grounds. In its
November 14, 2000 ruling, the Ingham Circuit Court reversed MDEQs decision
that directed we take certain actions and provide certain information, however,
the court also found that MDEQ had not approved the full use of the assessment
methodologies we utilized in Michigan.

We believed that the circuit courts finding that MDEQ had not approved
full use of the methodologies was not supported by the evidence, and was
contradicted by evidence contained in the administrative record. On December
5, 2000, we filed, in the Michigan Court of Appeals, an application for leave
to appeal the circuit courts finding that MDEQ did not approve the full use of
the assessment methodologies we utilized in Michigan. By order dated February
14, 2001, the Michigan Court of Appeals denied our application for leave to
appeal the circuit courts finding. On March 7, 2001, we filed an application
for leave to appeal with the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan. On August
28, 2001, the Michigan Supreme Court denied our application for leave to
appeal.

As a result of these proceedings, the MDEQs administrative decision
finding that certain of our assessment methodologies were not approved in full
was upheld, but the MDEQ was found not to have jurisdiction to enforce its
decision against us. In July 2002, the MDEQ sent certain underground storage
tank owners and operators who may have relied on our method of assessment a
notice informing them that certain of such owners and operators tanks were
improperly upgraded, that such owners and operators are to provide to MDEQ upon
request evidence that they have conducted state required tank tightness
testing, and certain of such tanks must be internally inspected. MDEQ also
advised that internally inspected tanks that do not satisfy applicable criteria
should be taken out-of-service and removed from the ground. There can be no
assurance that the MDEQ will not take further action against underground
storage tank owners or operators.

On July 25, 2002, a summons and complaint was issued from the Circuit
Court for the County of Ingham, Michigan. The action was commenced by Blodgett
Oil Company, Inc. and other owners and operators of underground storage tanks
systems on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated. The complaint
relates to the MDEQ regulatory proceeding described immediately above and names both the
Company and MDEQ. The plaintiffs seek an

51



---



##### Table of Contents



unspecified amount of damages in
excess of $25,000 from Corrpro. The plaintiffs also seek injunctive relief
prohibiting the MDEQ from declaring that underground storage tanks upgraded by
the Company do not meet the current requirement for corrosion protection set
forth by law. On November 18, 2002, the court issued an order certifying the
underlying class. The Michigan Court of Appeals denied the Companys
application for leave to appeal the Circuit Courts order certifying the
underlying class. . The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to
the claims asserted, including that damages have not yet been incurred.
Notwithstanding such defenses, under applicable law the Company believes that
the class would not be entitled to certain of the damages alleged. The Company
is unable at this time to make a determination as to whether a material
adverse outcome is reasonably possible and whether an adverse outcome would
have a materially adverse affect on its operations or financial condition.

During fiscal 2001, the Company discovered that a former employee used an
incorrect assessment standard in connection with the evaluation of whether
certain underground storage tanks located at as many as 67 sites were eligible
for upgrade using cathodic protection. Such evaluations were done using one of
the approved assessment methodologies. The tanks at these sites, which are
located in five states, were subsequently upgraded using cathodic protection,
which arrests corrosion. These tanks are also subject to ongoing leak
detection requirements. Based on the Companys review of available information
and governmental records, the Company believes that there have not been any
releases from the affected tanks as a result of the actions of the former
employee. The Company has contacted, and in October and November 2000 met with,
officials from the EPA and officials from the corresponding environmental
protection agencies of the five states involved to discuss this matter. It is
the Companys understanding that none of the states nor the EPA intend to take
any enforcement action as a result of the use of the inaccurate standard by the
former employee. The Company is currently working with the states and the EPA
to develop and implement field investigation procedures to assess the current
status of the affected sites. In one of the states in which affected sites are
located, the Company has completed field investigation procedures. The Company
has been informed by one of the other states that, based on continuing
monitoring and leak detection procedures already required to be performed by
site owners and operators, no additional field work procedures will be
required. The Company has commenced agreed upon field work procedures in a
third state. There are no currently outstanding claims or demands that have
been asserted by any of the affected owners and operators. Based on currently
available information, including the Companys experience in the fieldwork
conducted to date, the Company does not believe that it is reasonably possible
that the cost of further field investigation procedures for this matter will
have a material effect on the future operations, financial position or cash
flows of the Company.

The Company is a defendant in a purported class action suit filed on June
24, 2002, in the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division. The complaint also names certain former and current officers
and directors of the Company as defendants. The complaint was purportedly
filed on behalf of all persons who purchased Corrpro Common Shares during the
period April 1, 2000 through March 20, 2002 and alleges violations of the
federal securities laws resulting in artificially inflated prices of the
Companys Common Shares during the class period. The complaint relates to the
Companys announcement that it had discovered accounting irregularities caused
by apparent internal misconduct in its Australian subsidiary. The complaint
seeks unspecified compensatory damages, fees and expenses on behalf of the
putative class.

At least as early as October 2000, the then managing director and the
financial controller of Corrpro Australia Pty., Ltd., a subsidiary of Company,
were involved in knowingly misstating the financial results reported by the
Australian subsidiary to corporate management of the Company to improve the
reported results of the Australian business. Such individuals are no longer
employed by the Company or its subsidiaries and are defendants in a complaint
for permanent injunctive and other equitable relief filed by the SEC in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The former
Australian employees are also subject to an investigation and other proceedings
commenced through the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

The irregularities included erroneous journal entries to the Australian
subsidiarys general ledger that increased profit and net assets. Among other
things, the former Australian employees falsified invoices and credit notes and
made erroneous entries to subledgers including accounts payables, accounts
receivables, cost of goods sold and inventory. The former Australian employees
further recorded fictitious invoices in the former Australian subsidiarys
computerized accounting records, falsified credit notes from suppliers, and
created two different versions of the accounts receivable

52



---



##### Table of Contents



subledger. The former Australian employees took steps to fabricate
documents to be reviewed by the Companys independent auditors.

As a result of its discovery of the irregularities, the Company, by means
of its Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2002, restated its previously
issued audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001.
The effect of the restatement was to increase the Companys loss and basic and
diluted loss per share, respectively, from $4.7 million and $0.61 to $8.3
million and $1.07 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001. Consolidated
stockholders equity as of March 31, 2001 decreased by approximately $3.8
million from amounts previously reported. Unaudited quarterly financial
information for the first three quarters of the fiscal year ended March 31,
2002 and all four quarters of its fiscal year ended March 31, 2001, were also
restated by means of such filing. Information concerning the restated amounts
applicable to each of the foregoing quarters is contained in Note 12, Restated
Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited), Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 8 of the Companys Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 9, 2002.

On May 27, 2003, the District Court granted, with prejudice, the
defendants motions to dismiss the amended and consolidated class action
complaint. On June 24, 2003, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit from the order of
dismissal. The Company is unable at this time to make a determination as to
whether a material adverse outcome is reasonably possible and whether an
adverse outcome would have a materially adverse affect on its operations or
financial condition.

Company management discovered accounting irregularities at the Australian
subsidiary in early calendar 2002 and upon discovery immediately began an
internal investigation, which has been conducted under the direction of the
Audit Committee of its Board of Directors. The Australian Securities and
Investments Commission has commenced an independent investigation of the
accounting irregularities. Corrpro voluntarily disclosed this matter to the
SEC, which has commenced a formal inquiry. Corrpro is cooperating with both
commissions.

In January 2003, the Company received a Consolidated Compliance Order and
Notice of Potential Penalty from the Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality pursuant to which the department alleges that the Companys foundry
operations failed to submit required storm water monitoring information as
required by law. The alleged failure relates to periods subsequent to the
cessation of the Companys foundry operations. The Company has appealed the
matter and the department has agreed to engage in informal resolution of the
matter. Based on current available information, the Company does not believe
that it is reasonably possible that this matter will have a material effect on
the future operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

The Company is subject to other legal proceedings and claims which arise
in the ordinary course of business.

53



---



##### Table of Contents



SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited):

The following is a summary of the unaudited quarterly results of
operations of the Company for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002.
The sum of the quarterly per share figures does not equal annual per share
figures due to rounding.

|                                             |                                          |             |        |             |   |          |        |                |   |       |        |      |  |   |        |        |   |   |         |         |  
|-------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------ | ----------- | - | -------- | ------ | -------------- | - | ----- | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------ | ------ | - | - | ------- | ------- | -
|Three Months Ended                           |                                          | 06/30/02(2) |        | 09/30/02(3) |   | 12/31/02 |        | 03/31/03(4)(5) |   | Total
|                                             |                                          |             |        |             |   |          |        |                |   |      
|(In Thousands, Except per Share Data)        |                                          |             |        |             |   |          |        |                |   |       |        |      |  |   |        |        |   |   |         |        
|Revenues                                     |                                          |             |        |             |   |          |        |                |   |       |        |      |  |   |        |        |   |   |         |        
|Operating income (loss)                      |                                          |             |        |             |   |          |        |                |   |       |        |      |  |   |        |        |   |   |         |        
|Net Income (loss) from continuing operations |                                          | $           | 26,835 |             |   | $        | 28,286 |                |   | $     | 27,766 |      |  | $ | 21,333 |        |   | $ | 104,220 |        
|Net income (loss)                            |                                          |             | 535    |             |   |          | 1,686  |                |   |       | 1,958  |      |  |   | (1,354 | )      |   |   | 2,825   |        
|Earnings (loss) per share  Basic:           |                                          |             | (690   | )           |   |          | (221   | )              |   |       | 192    |      |  |   | (2,032 | )      |   |   | (2,751  | )      
|                                             | Income (loss) from continuing operations |             |        | (20,686     | ) |          |        | (3,357         | ) |       |        | 449  |  |   |        | (5,231 | ) |   |         | (28,825 | )
|                                             | Net income (loss)                        |             | $      | (0.08       | ) |          | $      | (0.03          | ) |       | $      | 0.02 |  |   | $      | (0.24  | ) |   | $       | (0.33   | )
|Weighted average number of shares  Basic    |                                          |             | (2.48  | )           |   |          | (0.40  | )              |   |       | 0.05   |      |  |   | (0.60  | )      |   |   | (3.43   | )      
|Earnings (loss) per share  Diluted:         |                                          |             | 8,350  |             |   |          | 8,403  |                |   |       | 8,408  |      |  |   | 8,408  |        |   |   | 8,387   |        
|                                             | Income (loss) from continuing operations |             | $      | (0.08       | ) |          | $      | (0.03          | ) |       | $      | 0.02 |  |   | $      | (0.24  | ) |   | $       | (0.33   | )
|                                             | Net income (loss)                        |             |        | (2.48       | ) |          |        | (0.40          | ) |       |        | 0.05 |  |   |        | (0.60  | ) |   |         | (3.43   | )
|Weighted average number of shares  Diluted  |                                          |             | 8,350  |             |   |          | 8,403  |                |   |       | 9,324  |      |  |   | 8,408  |        |   |   | 8,387   |        

|                                             |                                          |          |        |          |   |          |        |             |  |       |        |      |  |   |         |         |   |   |         |         |  
|-------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | -------- | ------ | -------- | - | -------- | ------ | ----------- |  | ----- | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------- | ------- | - | - | ------- | ------- | -
|Three Months Ended                           |                                          | 06/30/01 |        | 09/30/01 |   | 12/31/01 |        | 03/31/02(1) |  | Total
|                                             |                                          |          |        |          |   |          |        |             |  |      
|(In Thousands, Except per Share Data)        |                                          |          |        |          |   |          |        |             |  |       |        |      |  |   |         |         |   |   |         |        
|Revenues                                     |                                          |          |        |          |   |          |        |             |  |       |        |      |  |   |         |         |   |   |         |        
|Operating income (loss)                      |                                          |          |        |          |   |          |        |             |  |       |        |      |  |   |         |         |   |   |         |        
|Net Income (loss) from continuing operations |                                          | $        | 33,001 |          |   | $        | 31,099 |             |  | $     | 33,465 |      |  | $ | 25,493  |         |   | $ | 123,058 |        
|Net income (loss)                            |                                          |          | 1,973  |          |   |          | 2,297  |             |  |       | 2,025  |      |  |   | (2,890  | )       |   |   | 3,405   |        
|Earnings (loss) per share  Basic:           |                                          |          | 534    |          |   |          | 373    |             |  |       | 702    |      |  |   | (13,928 | )       |   |   | (12,319 | )      
|                                             | Income (loss) from continuing operations |          |        | 266      |   |          |        | 134         |  |       |        | 78   |  |   |         | (18,163 | ) |   |         | (18,217 | )
|                                             | Net income (loss)                        |          | $      | 0.07     |   |          | $      | 0.05        |  |       | $      | 0.09 |  |   | $       | (1.73   | ) |   | $       | (1.52   | )
|Weighted average number of shares  Basic    |                                          |          | (0.03  | )        |   |          | 0.02   |             |  |       | 0.01   |      |  |   | (2.20   | )       |   |   | (2.24   | )      
|Earnings (loss) per share  Diluted:         |                                          |          | 7,960  |          |   |          | 8,073  |             |  |       | 8,179  |      |  |   | 8,268   |         |   |   | 8,119   |        
|                                             | Income (loss) from continuing operations |          | $      | 0.07     |   |          | $      | 0.05        |  |       | $      | 0.09 |  |   | $       | (1.73   | ) |   | $       | (1.52   | )
|                                             | Net income (loss)                        |          |        | (0.03    | ) |          |        | 0.02        |  |       |        | 0.01 |  |   |         | (2.20   | ) |   |         | (2.24   | )
|Weighted average number of shares  Diluted  |                                          |          | 7,960  |          |   |          | 8,104  |             |  |       | 8,199  |      |  |   | 8,268   |         |   |   | 8,119   |        



---

|(1) |  | Included in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 was a tax valuation allowance of $10,472                                          
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | Included in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was goodwill impairment of $18,238                                                 
|   
|(3) |  | Included in discontinued operations in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 was an asset impairment charge of $900                 
|   
|(4) |  | Included in discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 was a gain on sale of discontinued operations of $2,095
|   
|(5) |  | Included in discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 was an asset impairment charge of $1,575               

54



---



##### Table of Contents






ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.




ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The following sets forth the names of all the directors of the Company as
of March 31, 2003 and certain other information relating to their position with
the Company and/or other business experience.

Michael K. Baach

Mr. Baach has been a director of Corrpro since August 2000 and an
Executive Vice President since April 1993. Mr. Baach was our Vice President of
Sales and Marketing from our formation in 1984 until February 1992 when he was
elected Senior Vice President. Mr. Baach has over twenty five years of
experience in the corrosion control market and has been responsible for
Corrpros marketing and sales activities, manufacturing and international
operations. Mr. Baach attended Cuyahoga Community College. Age 48.

David H. Kroon

Mr. Kroon has been a director of Corrpro since 1984, and an Executive Vice
President since April 1993. Mr. Kroon is currently our Executive Vice
President, Engineering. He served as Senior Vice President of Corrpro from its
formation in 1984 until April 1993. Mr. Kroon has over thirty years of
engineering and consulting experience in the corrosion control market,
including management of business, planning, policies and procedures, and
professional development. Mr. Kroon graduated from Yale University with a
Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry. Age 53.

C. Richard Lynham

Mr. Lynham has been a director of Corrpro since June 1992. Since 1992,
Mr. Lynham has been the owner and Chief Executive Officer of Harbor Castings,
Inc., an investment-casting foundry holding company with wholly-owned
subsidiaries in North Canton, Ohio, Piney Flats, Tennessee, and Muskegon,
Michigan. From 1984 to 1992, he was Group Vice President, Industrial Ceramics,
for Ferro Corporation, a Fortune 500 manufacturer of specialty industrial
products. Mr. Lynham is a director of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc. He holds
the degrees of Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering from Cornell University and
Master of Business Administration from Harvard University. Age 61.

Harry W. Millis

Mr. Millis has been a director of Corrpro since February 2002. Mr. Millis
has been Managing Director of SM Berger & Company, Inc., an investor relations
consulting firm, since January 1999. From April 1991 to January 1999, he was
Managing Director for Fundamental Research, Inc., an investment research
corporation. Mr. Millis began his financial career at National City Bank, was
a general partner in the brokerage firm of Prescott, Ball & Turben, where he
also served as Partner in Charge of Institutional Research, and then joined
McDonald & Co. as a general partner in 1979. Age 66.

Neal R. Restivo

Mr. Restivo has been a director since January 2001. Mr. Restivo is
currently Vice President  Operations and Finance and Chief Financial Officer
of Weatherchem Corporation, a provider of dispensing and packaging products
which he joined in October 2001. From February 2001 until September 2001, Mr.
Restivo was Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer at
Grand Eagle, Inc., a motor, transformer and power system repair services
company. From October 1995 to January 2001, Mr. Restivo was employed as our
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer. He was also elected Senior
Vice President in October 1995 and became an Executive Vice President of the

55



---



##### Table of Contents



Company in March 1998. Mr. Restivo graduated from Miami University, Ohio
with the degree of Bachelor of Science, Accountancy. Age 43.

Joseph W. Rog

Mr. Rog has been a director and Corrpros Chief Executive Officer since
our formation in 1984. Mr. Rog became Chairman of the Board in June 1993 and
has been President since June 1995. Mr. Rog was also Corrpros President
between January 1984 and June 1993. Mr. Rog has over thirty-five years of
industry experience in various technical and management capacities, and
particularly in corrosion analysis and the design and implementation of
corrosion control systems. He graduated from Kent State University with a
Bachelor of Science degree in Geology, and has also completed the Graduate
School of Business course at Stanford University. Age 63.

Warren F. Rogers

Dr. Rogers has been a director of Corrpro since July 1996. Dr. Rogers has
been President of Warren Rogers Associates, Inc., a Newport, Rhode Island firm
which provides underground storage tank management and consulting services,
including mathematical and statistical modeling, since 1979. Dr. Rogers also
served as a Vice President of the Center for Naval Analysis in Alexandria,
Virginia from 1982 to 1989. He earned a Ph.D. in statistics from Stanford
University and has an M.S. in Operations Research from the U.S. Naval
Post-Graduate School. Age 73.

Information regarding the executive officers of the Company as of March
31, 2003 is set forth in Part I, Item 4A of this Form 10-K.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based on a review of reports filed by our directors, executive officers
and beneficial holders of 10% or more of our shares, and upon information
provided by those persons, all SEC stock ownership reports required to be filed
by those reporting persons during fiscal 2003 were timely made except as
follows. Certain stock option grants to Messrs. Lynham, Millis, Restivo, and
Rogers, which were automatically granted under the 1997 Non-Employee Directors
Stock Option Plan, were not timely reported on Form 4 within the appropriate
time period. In addition, certain stock option grants to Messrs. Baach,
Gehring, Kroon, Mayer, Moran, and Schadeck were not timely reported on Form 4
within the appropriate time period. Our corporate staff, which coordinates
these filings, inadvertently failed to transmit the applicable Forms 4. All
such stock option grants were reported on Form 5 for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2003.

56



---



##### Table of Contents






ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

BOARD COMPENSATION

Retainer and Fees

Corrpro pays non-employee directors an annual retainer of $12,000. Corrpro
also pays non-employee directors $1,000 ($1,200 for a Committee chairperson)
for each in-person Board or Committee meeting attended and $350 ($550 for a
Committee chairperson) for each telephonic Board or Committee meeting attended.
Corrpro also reimburses its directors for reasonable out of pocket expenses
incurred in attending Board and Committee meetings.

In connection with the Audit Committees investigation of accounting
irregularities discovered at Corrpros Australian subsidiary, the Board
approved an arrangement to compensate the Audit Committee members for their
time and expenses devoted to the investigation. The Audit Committee members
receive their approved standard meeting fee for meetings convened to address
the investigation. In addition, Corrpro compensates each Audit Committee
member at the rate of $275 per half day and $550 per full day for time (other
than time spent in Committee meetings) devoted to the investigation.

Stock Appreciation Rights

In May 2001, the Board approved the 2001 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Appreciation Rights Plan. Pursuant to the plan, effective May 17, 2001, a
one-time grant of vested stock appreciation rights was made to non-employee
directors then serving on the Board at an exercise price of $2.10 per share.
The stock appreciation rights entitle each eligible director to be paid in
cash, subject to the applicable terms and conditions of the grant, on or after
May 17, 2006 the amount of appreciation in the fair market value over the
exercise price of 10,000 Corrpro Common Shares between May 17, 2001 and May 17,
2006.

Deferred Compensation Plan

Eligible directors may elect to defer payment of all or any part of their
retainer and fees under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors.
Participating directors elect an investment model which determines the return
on their deferred funds. The investment model can include Corrpro Common
Shares. Deferred portions are payable in a lump sum, over a period of five
years or over a period of ten years. The director specifies in advance the date
on which payments will begin. Payments may be accelerated if the director dies
or becomes disabled.

Outside Directors Stock Option Plan

Under the 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, Corrpro
automatically grants stock options to purchase 2,500 Corrpro Common Shares at
fair market value on the date a director is first elected and, beginning the
next calendar year, on each September 30th on which the individual continues as
a Corrpro director.

57



---



##### Table of Contents



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

Summary of Compensation

The following table summarizes the compensation we paid our CEO and each
of the four other most highly compensated executive officers for fiscal 2003,
2002 and 2001.

|                       |                           |        |      |        |  |          |         |                         |  |                 |       |        |        |  |              |   |  |  |        |         |  |   |     |       | 
|---------------------- | ------------------------- | ------ | ---- | ------ |  | -------- | ------- | ----------------------- |  | --------------- | ----- | ------ | ------ |  | ------------ | - |  |  | ------ | ------- |  | - | --- | ----- | 
|                       |                           |        |      |        |  |          |         |                         |  |                 |       |        |        |  | Long Term    |   |  |  |       
|                       |                           |        |      |        |  |          |         |                         |  |                 |       |        |        |  | Compensation |   |  |  |       
|                       |                           |        |      |        |  |          |         |                         |  |                 | Other |        | Awards |  |              |   | 
|Name and Principal     |                           | Fiscal |      |        |  |          |         | Annual                  |  | Stock Other     |       |        |        | 
|Position               |                           | Year   |      | Salary |  | Bonus(3) |         | Compensation Options(2) |  | Compensation(1)
|                       |                           |        |      |        |  |          |         |                         |  |                
|Joseph W. Rog          |                           |        | 2003 |        |  | $        | 285,000 |                         |  | $               | 0     |        |        |  | 0            |   |  |  | 0      |         |  | $ | 877 |      
|                       | Chairman of the Board,    |        |      | 2002   |  |          |         | 285,000                 |  |                 | $     | 0      |        |  |              | 0 |  |  |        | 206,250 |  |   |     | 8,418 | 
|                       | Chief Executive Officer   |        |      | 2001   |  |          |         | 285,000                 |  |                 |       | 0      |        |  |              | 0 |  |  |        | 28,000  |  |   |     | 8,543 | 
|                       | and President             |        |      |        |  |          |         |                         |  |                 |       |        |        |  |              |   |  |  |        |         |  |   |     |       | 
|Michael K. Baach       |                           |        | 2003 |        |  |          | 180,000 |                         |  |                 | 0     |        |        |  | 0            |   |  |  | 10,000 |         |  |   | 554 |      
|                       | Executive Vice President, |        |      | 2002   |  |          |         | 180,000                 |  |                 |       | 0      |        |  |              | 0 |  |  |        | 56,250  |  |   |     | 6,628 | 
|                       | Sales                     |        |      | 2001   |  |          |         | 180,000                 |  |                 |       | 0      |        |  |              | 0 |  |  |        | 17,000  |  |   |     | 6,690 | 
|George A. Gehring, Jr. |                           |        | 2003 |        |  |          | 172,000 |                         |  |                 | 0     |        |        |  | 0            |   |  |  | 10,000 |         |  |   | 530 |      
|                       | Executive Vice            |        |      | 2002   |  |          |         | 172,000                 |  |                 |       | 17,355 |        |  |              | 0 |  |  |        | 131,250 |  |   |     | 6,881 | 
|                       | President, U.S            |        |      | 2001   |  |          |         | 172,000                 |  |                 |       | 0      |        |  |              | 0 |  |  |        | 17,000  |  |   |     | 6,865 | 
|                       | Operations                |        |      |        |  |          |         |                         |  |                 |       |        |        |  |              |   |  |  |        |         |  |   |     |       | 
|David H. Kroon         |                           |        | 2003 |        |  |          | 170,000 |                         |  |                 | 0     |        |        |  | 0            |   |  |  | 10,000 |         |  |   | 523 |      
|                       | Executive Vice            |        |      | 2002   |  |          |         | 170,000                 |  |                 |       | 0      |        |  |              | 0 |  |  |        | 46,875  |  |   |     | 6,016 | 
|                       | President,                |        |      | 2001   |  |          |         | 170,000                 |  |                 |       | 0      |        |  |              | 0 |  |  |        | 17,000  |  |   |     | 6,120 | 
|                       | Engineering               |        |      |        |  |          |         |                         |  |                 |       |        |        |  |              |   |  |  |        |         |  |   |     |       | 
|Barry W. Schadeck      |                           |        | 2003 |        |  |          | 180,000 |                         |  |                 | 0     |        |        |  | 0            |   |  |  | 10,000 |         |  |   | 0   |      
|                       | Executive Vice President, |        |      | 2002   |  |          |         | 180,000                 |  |                 |       | 0      |        |  |              | 0 |  |  |        | 91,250  |  |   |     | 0     | 
|                       | President of              |        |      | 2001   |  |          |         | 180,000                 |  |                 |       | 0      |        |  |              | 0 |  |  |        | 17,000  |  |   |     | 0     | 
|                       | Corrpro Canada, Inc.      |        |      |        |  |          |         |                         |  |                 |       |        |        |  |              |   |  |  |        |         |  |   |     |       | 



---

|(1) |  | Amounts represent Company matching contributions under Corrpros 401(k)
retirement savings plan.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | These options were granted in June 2001 pursuant to the Companys stock
option surrender program in an amount equal to the same number of options
surrendered under the program. The new options are subject to the terms
of the applicable option agreement and the provisions of the Corrpro 1997
Long-Term Incentive Plan and become exercisable in equal annual increments
on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.
|   
|(3) |  | Amounts represent bonus earned pursuant to the Companys Management
Incentive Plan for fiscal 2002.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

58



---



##### Table of Contents



Options Granted in Last Fiscal Year

The following table lists our grants during fiscal 2003 of stock options
to the officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. The amounts shown as
potential realizable values rely on arbitrarily assumed increases in value
required by the SEC. The ultimate value of the options depends on actual
future share prices. Market conditions and other factors can influence those
future share values, and the amounts shown below are not intended to forecast
future appreciation of Corrpro Common Shares.

|                       |  |                 |        |              |  |          |     |            |  |        |      |         |  |                   |     |  |       |                            |     |  |       |  |     | 
|---------------------- |  | --------------- | ------ | ------------ |  | -------- | --- | ---------- |  | ------ | ---- | ------- |  | ----------------- | --- |  | ----- | -------------------------- | --- |  | ----- |  | --- | 
|                       |  |                 |        |              |  |          |     |            |  |        |      |         |  |                   |     |  |       | Potential realizable value
|                       |  |                 |        |              |  |          |     |            |  |        |      |         |  |                   |     |  |       | at assumed annual rates of
|                       |  |                 |        |              |  |          |     |            |  |        |      |         |  |                   |     |  |       | stock price appreciation  
|Individual grants      |  | for option term
|                       |  |                
|                       |  | Number of       |        | Percent of   |  |          |     |            |  |        |      |         |  |                   |     |  |       |                            |     | 
|                       |  | securities      |        | total        |  | Exercise |     |            |  |        |      |         |  |                   |     |  |       |                           
|                       |  | underlying      |        | options/SARs |  | or base  |     |            |  |        |      |         |  |                   |     |  |       |                           
|                       |  | option/SARs     |        | granted to   |  | price    |     |            |  |        |      |         |  |                   |     |  |       |                           
|                       |  | granted (#)     |        | employees in |  | ($/Sh)   |     | Expiration |  |        |      |         |  |                   |     | 
|Name                   |  | (1)             |        | fiscal year  |  | (2)      |     | date       |  | 5% ($) |      | 10% ($)
|(a)                    |  | (b)             |        | (c)          |  | (d)      |     | (e)        |  | (f)    |      | (g)    
|                       |  |                 |        |              |  |          |     |            |  |        |      |        
|Joseph W. Rog          |  |                 | 0      |              |  |          | 0.0 | %          |  | $      | N/A  |         |  |                   | N/A |  |       | $                          | N/A |  |       |  | N/A | 
|Michael K. Baach       |  |                 | 10,000 |              |  |          | 3.8 |            |  |        | 0.32 |         |  | February 26, 2013 |     |  | 2,012 |                            |     |  | 6,000 | 
|George A. Gehring, Jr. |  |                 | 10,000 |              |  |          | 3.8 |            |  |        | 0.32 |         |  | February 26, 2013 |     |  | 2,012 |                            |     |  | 6,000 | 
|David H. Kroon         |  |                 | 10,000 |              |  |          | 3.8 |            |  |        | 0.32 |         |  | February 26, 2013 |     |  | 2,012 |                            |     |  | 6,000 | 
|Barry W. Schadeck      |  |                 | 10,000 |              |  |          | 3.8 |            |  |        | 0.32 |         |  | February 26, 2013 |     |  | 2,012 |                            |     |  | 6,000 | 



---

|(1) |  | The new options are subject to the terms of the applicable options
agreement and the provisions of the Corrpro 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan
and become exercisable on February 26, 2010, provided the exercise of such
options is subject to acceleration as to one-third of the options granted
on the date the price of the Companys shares close for a consecutive 30
day period at an average price equal to or greater than $0.50, at which
time the one-third of the options become exercisable, $1.00, at which time
two-thirds of the options become exercisable, and $1.50, at which time all
options become exercisable. The options also may become exercisable upon
a change in control as defined either in the 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan
or the applicable change in control agreements entered into by Corrpro and
the named executive officers.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | Based on the closing price of the common shares of $0.32 on the American
Stock Exchange on February 25, 2003.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year/And Fiscal Year End Option/SAR Values

The following table shows for the officers named in the summary
compensation table above information about their exercise of stock options to
purchase common shares during fiscal 2003 and their unexercised stock options
to purchase common shares at March 31, 2003.

59



---



##### Table of Contents



|                       |  |                 |  |              |     |                            |  |                |         |                                 |  |                      |        |  |  |  |   |                      |  |  |     |  |  | 
|---------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ------------ | --- | -------------------------- |  | -------------- | ------- | ------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------ |  |  |  | - | -------------------- |  |  | --- |  |  | 
|                       |  |                 |  |              |     |                            |  |                |         |                                 |  |                      |        |  |  |  |   | Value of Unexercised
|                       |  |                 |  |              |     |                            |  |                |         | Number of Securities Underlying |  | In-the-Money Options
|                       |  | Shares Acquired |  | Value        |     | Options at Fiscal Year-End |  | at Fiscal Year
|Name                   |  | on Exercise     |  | Realized ($) |     | Exercisable                |  | Unexercisable  |         | Exercisable                     |  | Unexercisable       
|                       |  |                 |  |              |     |                            |  |                |         |                                 |  |                     
|Joseph W. Rog          |  | None            |  |              | N/A |                            |  |                | 182,507 |                                 |  |                      | 96,743 |  |  |  | 0 |                      |  |  | 0   | 
|Michael K. Baach       |  | None            |  |              | N/A |                            |  |                | 56,252  |                                 |  |                      | 45,748 |  |  |  | 0 |                      |  |  | 800 | 
|George A. Gehring, Jr. |  | None            |  |              | N/A |                            |  |                | 103,104 |                                 |  |                      | 70,746 |  |  |  | 0 |                      |  |  | 800 | 
|David H. Kroon         |  | None            |  |              | N/A |                            |  |                | 50,002  |                                 |  |                      | 42,623 |  |  |  | 0 |                      |  |  | 800 | 
|Barry W. Schadeck      |  | None            |  |              | N/A |                            |  |                | 60,836  |                                 |  |                      | 57,414 |  |  |  | 0 |                      |  |  | 800 | 

Employment and Change in Control Agreements

Mr. Rog is employed under an employment agreement having a term through
March 31, 2004. Under this agreement, Mr. Rog serves as Corrpros Chairman of
the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President. The agreement provides for
Mr. Rog to be nominated as a Corrpro director for so long as such agreement
remains in effect.

This employment agreement provides for the payment of Mr. Rogs base
salary and such other compensation as determined by the Board of Directors from
time to time. Other compensation may include bonuses, stock options and
incentive compensation. Mr. Rogs base salary is subject to annual review.

Mr. Rog may not compete with Corrpro during the term of the agreement and
for as long as Mr. Rog receives retirement income payments from Corrpro.
Corrpro may terminate Mr. Rogs employment for good cause (as defined in the
agreement), in which case the Company will pay Mr. Rog his base salary earned
through termination with no further obligation to him except as required by
law. Mr. Rog has earned the right to receive retirement income with a lifetime
survivor benefit to his spouse in an amount equal to 50% of his base salary,
payable monthly, provided that certain conditions are satisfied.

Corrpro may have to pay severance to Mr. Rog if specified events occur.
These events include termination of his employment at a time when Corrpro is in
breach or termination of the agreement by Corrpro without good cause. In such
cases, Corrpro must pay two years of severance at the rate of his base salary
in effect at the time of termination plus a payment equal to one full years
participation in any short-term incentive bonus plan at the 100% level. Mr. Rog
also would be entitled to continue any medical or other insurance coverage in
effect at the time of termination until age 65.

Mr. Rog is eligible for disability benefits. If he becomes disabled while
employed, his salary and other compensation continues for the first ninety
days, offset by amounts paid under other company-sponsored disability plans. If
his disability cannot be reasonably accommodated, the Board may terminate his
employment. In such case, Mr. Rogs current participation in bonus and
incentive plans will not be adversely affected. Mr. Rog also is covered by
other company welfare benefits.

Corrpro and each of Mr. Baach, Mr. Gehring and Mr. Kroon have signed
employment agreements effective through March 31, 2004 under which each serves
as an Executive Vice President. These agreements provide for the payment of
base salaries, subject to annual adjustment. In general, these agreements
provide severance arrangements similar to those included in the employment
agreement with Mr. Rog described above, except that no retirement income will
be paid and that medical and other insurance coverage shall continue for a
period of twenty-four months rather than to age 65 if the executive is
terminated when specified events occur. Mr. Schadecks services are provided
through one of Corrpros Canadian subsidiaries. This subsidiary has engaged Mr.
Schadeck under a management services agreement which provides for base level
compensation and bonuses based on performance. The agreements with the named
executive officers generally restrict the officers from competing for two years
following termination.

We recognize that our executives may be involved from time to time in
evaluating or negotiating offers, proposals, or other transactions that could
result in a change in control of Corrpro and believe that it is in the best
interest

60



---



##### Table of Contents



of Corrpro and its shareholders for such executives to be in a position,
free from personal financial and employment considerations, to be able to
assess objectively and pursue aggressively our interests and the interests of
our shareholders in making these evaluations and carrying on such negotiations.
Therefore, we have entered into change in control agreements with our named
executive officers. The agreements are intended to provide the executives with
certain benefits and to grant certain protections so that the executives may
more fully focus on enhancing shareholder value and addressing the issues
related to a change in control (as defined in the agreements), and to reward
the executives for the substantial extra effort involved in a change in
control.

The change in control agreements provide for severance payment, and other
benefits without duplication of amounts payable under the executive employment
contracts, if certain events occur. Each agreement applies only to the first
change in control to occur.

The type of change in control determines the potential severance benefits.
Upon the occurrence of a hostile change in control, the executive would be
entitled, whether or not employment is terminated, to a lump sum payment equal
to three times current cash compensation, bonus and certain benefits and a
gross-up for certain excise taxes, if they apply. The executive would also be
entitled to three years of continued welfare benefits. In a friendly change in
control, if the executive is terminated, other than for good cause, or resigns
for good reason, in contemplation of or before the second anniversary of the
friendly change in control, the executive is entitled to, in total, a lump sum
payment equal to two times current cash compensation, bonus and certain
benefits. The executive would also be entitled to two years of continued
welfare benefits. In the event of a change in control of any type, all of the
executives outstanding stock options become exercisable. In addition, Corrpro
must set aside sufficient funds, in a trust which satisfies certain tax
requirements, covering potential obligations to Mr. Rog. The following terms
are used in this paragraph, as defined in the change in control agreements:
hostile change in control, welfare benefits, friendly change in control, good
cause, good reason and in contemplation of.

In addition, to provide further incentives to management to maximize
shareholder value on a continuing basis and to address certain other concerns,
executives can earn a transaction bonus upon a change in control in certain
circumstances. In the event of a friendly change in control, the transaction
bonuses are payable 50% upon completion of a change in control and 50% on the
first anniversary thereof, provided the executive is still a Corrpro employee
at that time.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal 2003, Joseph W. Rog served as our Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President and until November 12, 2002 also served
on our Compensation Committee.




ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table shows information regarding beneficial ownership of
our Common Shares as of June 17, 2002, unless otherwise indicated, by each
person or group which is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our
common shares, each director and nominee for election as a director, each of
the officers named in the Summary Compensation Table and all directors and
executive officers as a group. All information with respect to beneficial
ownership has been furnished by the respective director, officer or
shareholder, as the case may be. Ownership includes direct and indirect
(beneficial) ownership, as defined by SEC rules. To our knowledge, each person,
along with his or her spouse, has sole voting and investment power over the
shares unless otherwise noted.

61



---



##### Table of Contents



Certain Beneficial Owners

|                                                                                   |                                                              |           |           |         |  |  |      |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ | --------- | --------- | ------- |  |  | ---- |  | 
|                                                                                   |                                                              |           | Number of |         |  |  |     
|Name                                                                               |                                                              | Shares(1) |           | Percent
|                                                                                   |                                                              |           |           |        
|Michael K. Baach                                                                   |                                                              |           | 147,366   |         |  |  | 1.6  | 
|George A. Gehring, Jr.                                                             |                                                              |           | 110,754   |         |  |  | 1.2  | 
|David H. Kroon                                                                     |                                                              |           | 298,399   |         |  |  | 3.3  | 
|C. Richard Lynham                                                                  |                                                              |           | 24,375    |         |  |  | *    | 
|Harry Millis                                                                       |                                                              |           | 51,100    |         |  |  | *    | 
|Neal R. Restivo                                                                    |                                                              |           | 115,332   |         |  |  | 1.3  | 
|Joseph W. Rog                                                                      |                                                              |           | 452,386   |         |  |  | 5.0  | 
|Warren F. Rogers                                                                   |                                                              |           | 33,375    |         |  |  | *    | 
|14 Directors and executive officers as a group                                     |                                                              |           | 1,358,548 |         |  |  | 15.0 | 
|JB Capital Partners L.P.(2)                                                        |                                                              |           | 617,200   |         |  |  | 7.3  | 
|                                                                                   | 23 Berkley Lane
Rye Brook, New York 10573                    |           |           |         |  |  |      |  | 
|T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(2)                                                  |                                                              |           | 650,000   |         |  |  | 7.7  | 
|                                                                                   | 100 East Pratt St.
Baltimore, Maryland 21202                 |           |           |         |  |  |      |  | 
|Royce & Associates, Inc.(2)                                                        |                                                              |           | 612,575   |         |  |  | 7.29 | 
|                                                                                   | 1414 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019         |           |           |         |  |  |      |  | 
|Delta Partners LLC(2)
One Financial Center, Suite 1600
Boston, Massachusetts 02111 |                                                              |           | 492,168   |         |  |  | 5.9  | 
|Prudential Financial, Inc.(2)                                                      |                                                              |           | 521,290   |         |  |  | 5.9  | 
|                                                                                   | 751 Broad St.
Newark, New Jersey 07102                       |           |           |         |  |  |      |  | 
|Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc.(2)                                                 |                                                              |           | 448,300   |         |  |  | 5.33 | 
|                                                                                   | 1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor
Santa Monica, California 90401 |           |           |         |  |  |      |  | 



---

|*   |  | Less than 1%                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(1) |  | The number of shares listed includes shares under currently exercisable
stock options and stock options which may become exercisable within 60 days
following June 24, 2003. The number of such exercisable stock options for those
listed above are: Mr. Baach (56,252 shares); Mr. Gehring (103,104 shares);
Mr. Kroon (50,002 shares); Mr. Lynham (22,500 shares); Mr. Millis (1,250 shares);
Mr. Restivo (112,500 shares); Mr. Rog (182,507 shares); and Dr. Rogers (13,125
shares); and all directors and executive officers as a group (633,660 shares).
|   
|(2) |  | Based upon information contained in the following documents as filed with
the SEC:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            



| |  |  | Amendment to Schedule 13G jointly filed by Delta Partners LLC,
Charles Jobson and Christopher Argyople on January 27, 2003. Delta
Partners LLC reported that it had shared voting and dispositive power
with respect to
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

62



---



##### Table of Contents





| |   |  | 492,168 shares. Charles Jobson
reported that he had shared voting and dispositive power with respect
to 492,168 shares.
Christopher Argyrople
reported that he had shared voting and dispositive power with respect to
492,168 shares.                                                                                                                                                                        
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | Schedule 13G filed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. on February 14, 2003.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|
| |  |  | Amendment to Schedule 13G filed by Royce & Associates LLC on February 4, 2003.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|
| |  |  | Amendment to Schedule 13G filed by Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. on February 3, 2003.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|
| |  |  | Schedule 13G filed by Prudential Financial, Inc. on February 7, 2003.
Included in the number of shares stated above are 467,290 Warrants
which are convertible into common stock at a ratio of 1:1.                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|
| |  |  | Amendment to Schedule 13G was jointly filed by JB Capital Partners,
L.P. and Alan W. Weber on February 14, 2003. JB Capital Partners, L.P.
reported that it had shared voting and dispositive power with respect to
582,200 shares. Alan W. Weber reported that he had sole voting and
dispositive power with respect to 35,000 shares and shared voting and
dispositive power with respect to 582,200 shares.

Information regarding the Companys equity compensation plans is set forth in
Part II, Item 5 of this Form 10-K.




ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

None




ITEM 14. Controls and Procedures



|(a) |  | Controls and Procedures.
|--- |  | ------------------------

On August 9, 2002, the Company issued restated consolidated financial
statements included in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) as of and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, and
related quarterly periods (the 10-K/A). The restatement occurred because
certain accounting errors and irregularities in the Companys financial
statements were identified. As discussed in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year 2002 filed with the SEC on August 9, 2002, the Company
has been advised that the SEC is conducting an investigation into the facts and
circumstances giving rise to the restatement, and the Company has been and
intends to continue cooperating with the SEC. The Company cannot predict the
outcome of such an investigation.

Following the commencement of an internal review of its accounting records
and procedures and the investigation initiated by the Companys Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors in connection with the restatement process (the
Audit Committee Investigation), the Company initiated a significant
restructuring plan. The multi-year plan includes a series of initiatives to
improve operating income and reduce debt. The Company intends to sell non-core
business units and use the proceeds to reduce debt. These activities, while
critical to the successful restructuring of the Company, complicate the
Companys ability to assess the overall effectiveness of internal controls.

Since the inception of the restatement process and Audit Committee
Investigation, the Company has made a number of significant changes that
strengthened the internal controls over its financial accounting, reporting and
disclosure procedures (the Reporting and Disclosure Procedures). These
changes included, but were not necessarily limited to, (i) communicating
clearly and consistently a tone from senior management regarding the proper
conduct in these matters, (ii) strengthening the North American financial
management organizational reporting chain, (iii) requiring stricter account
reconciliation standards, (iv) updating and expanding the distribution of the
Companys business conduct questionnaire, (v) requiring quarterly as well as
annual business units written representations, (vi) expanding the financial
accounting procedures in the current year, (vii) temporarily supplementing the
Companys existing staff with additional contractor-based support to collect
and analyze the information necessary to prepare the Companys financial
statements, related disclosures and other information requirements contained in
the Companys SEC periodic reporting until the 492,168 shares. Charles Jobson reported that he had shared voting and
dispositive power with respect to

63



---



##### Table of Contents



Company implements changes to the current organization and staffing,
(viii) commencing a comprehensive, team-based process to further assess and
enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the Companys financial processes,
including support efforts which better integrate current and evolving financial
information system initiatives, and addressing any remaining weaknesses, and
(ix) establishment of an internal audit function.

The Company will continue the process of identifying and implementing
corrective actions where required to improve the effectiveness of its Reporting
and Control Procedures. Significant supplemental resources will continue to be
required to prepare the required financial and other information during this
process, particularly in view of the Companys current stage of restructuring.
The changes made to date as discussed above have enabled the Company to restate
its previous filings where required, as well as subsequently prepare and file
the remainder of the required periodic reports for fiscal 2003 and 2002 on a
current basis.



|(b) |  | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------

The Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the
Senior Officers), with the participation of other members of the Companys
management, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a  14(c) and 15d -
14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act)) as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date). Based on that evaluation, and subject to
inherent limitations on the effectiveness of internal controls as described
below, the Senior Officers have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that
information required to be disclosed by the Company is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules
and forms. There were no significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the
date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|(c) |  | Inherent Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------

A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control
system are met. In addition, a control system is subject to implementation
based on the cost effectiveness of such controls. Further, because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, including faulty judgments in
decision making or breakdowns resulting from simple errors or mistakes, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Additionally, controls can
be circumvented by individual acts, collusion or by management override of the
controls in place. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or deterioration of the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures. Due to the inherent limitation of control systems, misstatements
due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Given such inherent
limitations, the Senior Officers and other members of the Companys management,
do not expect our disclosure controls or procedures to prevent all possible
instances of error and fraud.




ITEM 16. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K



| | (a) |  | (1) The following consolidated financial statements are included in
Part II, Item 8:             
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |     |  | Report of Independent Accountants                                                                
|
| |     |  | Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2003 and 2002                                           
|
| |     |  | Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended March 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001          
|
| |     |  | Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the years
ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

64



---



##### Table of Contents





| |  |  | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001
| |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                             

65



---



##### Table of Contents





| | (a) |  | (3) Index to Exhibits:
| | --- |  | ----------------------

|        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|No.     |  | Exhibit                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|3.1     |  | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company.(1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|3.2     |  | Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of the Company.(2)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|4.1     |  | Specimen certificate for the Common Shares.(3)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|4.2     |  | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 9, 2000 among
Corrpro Companies, Inc., CSI Coating Systems, Inc. and the Lenders Party
thereto. Other long-term debt agreements of the Company, except for Note
Purchase Agreement, are not filed pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of
Regulation S-K. The Company will furnish copies of any such agreements to
the Securities and Exchange Commission upon its request.(4)
|4.3     |  | First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated October 19, 2000 relating to
the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 9, 2000 among
Corrpro Companies, Inc., CSI Coating Systems, Inc. and the Lenders Party
thereto.(12)                                                                                                                                                                                               
|4.4     |  | Letter Agreement dated October 19, 2000 relating to the Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 9, 2000 among Corrpro
Companies, Inc., CSI Coating Systems, Inc. and the Lenders Party thereto.(12)                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|4.5     |  | Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of June 29, 2001 relating
to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 9, 2000
among Corrpro Companies, Inc., CSI Coating Systems, Inc. and the Lenders
Party thereto.(12)                                                                                                                                                                                           
|4.6     |  | Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 10, 2001 relating
to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 9, 2000
among Corrpro Companies, Inc., CSI Coating Systems, Inc. and the Lenders
Party thereto.(13)                                                                                                                                                                                          
|4.7     |  | Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of November 12, 2001
relating to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 9,
2000 among Corrpro Companies, Inc., CSI Coating Systems, Inc. and the
Lenders Party thereto.(14)                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.8     |  | Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of February 11, 2002
relating to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 9,
2000 among Corrpro Companies, Inc., CSI Coating Systems, Inc. and the
Lenders Party thereto.(15)                                                                                                                                                                                        
|4.9     |  | Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of September 23, 2002
relating to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 9,
2000 among Corrpro Companies Inc., CSI Coating Systems, Inc. and the
Lenders party thereto.(17)                                                                                                                                                                                        
|4.10    |  | Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of November 1, 2002
relating to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 9,
2000 among Corrpro Companies Inc., CSI Coating Systems, Inc. and the
Lenders party thereto.(18)                                                                                                                                                                                        
|4.11    |  | Eight Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of February 10, 2003
relating to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 9,
2000 among Corrpro Companies, Inc., CSI Coatings Systems, Inc. and the
Lenders party thereto.                                                                                                                                                                                           
|4.12    |  | Note Purchase Agreement dated as of January 21, 1998 by and among the
Company and the Purchaser herein. (5)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

66



---



##### Table of Contents



|        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|No.     |  | Exhibit                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|4.13    |  | Rights Agreement dated as of July 23, 1997 between the Company and Fifth
Third Bank, successor Rights Agent. (6)                                                                                        
|4.14    |  | Amendment dated June 9, 2000 to Note Purchase Agreement dated January 21, 1998. (4)                                                                                                                     
|4.15    |  | Amendment dated October 18, 2000 to Note Purchase Agreement dated January 21, 1998. (12)                                                                                                                
|4.16    |  | Letter Agreement dated October 18, 2000 by and between The Prudential
Insurance Company of America and the Company relating to the Note Purchase
Agreement dated as of January 21, 1998. (12)           
|4.17    |  | Amendment dated as of June 29, 2001 by and between The Prudential
Insurance Company of America and the Company relating to the Note Purchase
Agreement dated as of January 21, 1998. (12)               
|4.18    |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Bank One, NA dated as of
September 23, 2002. (17)                                                                                                               
|4.19    |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to The Prudential Insurance Company
of America dated as of September 23, 2002. (17)                                                                                
|4.20    |  | Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 23, 2002 between the
Company and Bank One, NA. (17)                                                                                                 
|4.21    |  | Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 23, 2002 between the
Company and The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (17)                                                                  
|4.22    |  | Amendment dated as of September 23, 2002 between the Company and The
Prudential Insurance Company of America relating to the Note Purchase
Agreement dated as of January 21, 1998. (17)                 
|*10.1   |  | Corrpro Companies, Inc. 2001 Non-Employees Directors Stock Appreciation
Rights Plan and form of Award Agreement. (16)                                                                                  
|*10.2   |  | 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Corrpro Companies, Inc. (7)                                                                                                                                            
|*10.3   |  | Amendment to 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Corrpro Companies, Inc. (8)                                                                                                                               
|*10.4   |  | 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan. (7)                                                                                                                                                     
|10.5    |  | Corrpro Companies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (9)                                                                                                                                               
|*10.6   |  | December 2000 Stock Option Agreement Surrender form. (12)                                                                                                                                               
|*10.7   |  | Form of Indemnification Agreement for Officers and Directors of the Company. (10)                                                                                                                       
|10.8    |  | Consulting Agreement dated April 1, 1997 by and between Commonwealth
Seager Holdings Ltd. and Corrtech Consulting Group. (11)                                                                           
|*10.9   |  | Employment Agreement effective November 2, 2000 by and between the
Company and Joseph W. Rog. (12)                                                                                                      
|*10.10  |  | Form of Executive Officer Employment Agreement by and between the
Company and certain executive officers and schedule thereto. (10)                                                                     
|*10.11  |  | Stock Option Agreement dated as of June 15, 1992 and November 15, 1992
by and between the Company and C. Richard Lynham, Michael K. Baach, George
A. Gehring, Jr., David H. Kroon and Joseph W. Rog. (3)

67



---



##### Table of Contents



|        |  |                                                                                                                                      
|------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit |  |                                                                                                                                      
|No.     |  | Exhibit                                                                                                                              
|        |  |                                                                                                                                      
|*10.12  |  | Company Incentive Option Plan as amended. (3)                                                                                        
|*10.13  |  | Company Deferred Compensation Plan. (12)                                                                                             
|*10.14  |  | Consulting Agreement dated January 26, 2001 by and between the Company and Neal R. Restivo. (12)                                     
|*10.15  |  | Form of Change in Control Agreement entered into between the Company and
certain of its executive officers and schedule thereto. (10)
|21.1    |  | Subsidiaries of the Company. (4)                                                                                                     
|23.1    |  | Consent of KPMG LLP.                                                                                                                 
|99.1    |  | 906 Certification CEO                                                                                                                
|99.2    |  | 906 Certification CFO                                                                                                                



---

|*   |  | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement identified
pursuant to Item 14(a)(3) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(1) |  | A copy of this exhibit filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 1998 is incorporated
herein by reference.                                                                                                                                                                                  
|   
|(2) |  | A copy of this exhibit filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-74814) is incorporated herein
by reference.                                                                                                                                                                                        
|   
|(3) |  | Copies of the exhibits to which this footnote applies were filed,
respectively, as Exhibits 4.1 (Stock certificate specimen), 10.13, 10.19,
10.20, 10.22 and 10.23 (Stock Option Agreements) and 10.25 (Incentive
Option Plan) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-64482) and are hereby incorporated by reference.
|   
|(4) |  | Copies of the exhibits to which this footnote applies were filed,
respectively, as Exhibits 4.3 (Amended and Restated Credit Agreement), 4.6
(Note Purchase Agreement Amendment) and 21.1 (Subsidiaries) to the
Companys report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2000 and are
hereby incorporated by reference.                             
|   
|(5) |  | A copy of this exhibit filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 1997 is incorporated
herein by reference.                                                                                                                                                                                  
|   
|(6) |  | A copy of this exhibit filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form 8-A filed August 7, 1997 is incorporated herein by
reference.                                                                                                                                                                                               
|   
|(7) |  | Copies of the exhibits to which this footnote applies were filed,
respectively, as Exhibits 4.4 (1997 Long-Term Inventive Plan) and 4.5
(1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan) to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed October 24, 1997 (SEC File No.
333-38767), and are hereby incorporated by reference.                 
|   
|(8) |  | A copy of this exhibit filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed January 19, 2000 (SEC File No. 333-94989) is
incorporated herein by reference.                                                                                                                                                                    

68



---



##### Table of Contents



|(9)  |  | A copy of this exhibit contained in Corrpros Definitive Proxy Statement
on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June
16, 1999 is incorporated herein by reference.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    
|(10) |  | Copies of the exhibits to which this footnote applies were filed,
respectively, as Exhibits 10.2 (Change in Control Agreement) and 10.3
(Indemnification Agreement) to the Companys report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2000, and are hereby incorporated by
reference.                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|    
|(11) |  | A copy of this exhibit filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys report on
Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 1998 is hereby incorporated by
reference.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|    
|(12) |  | Copies of the exhibits filed to which this footnote applies were filed,
respectively, as Exhibits 4.3 (First Amendment to Credit Agreement), 4.4
(Letter Agreement), 4.5 (Second Amendment to Credit Agreement), 4.9
(Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement), 4.10 (Letter Agreement), 10.3
(Employment Agreement), 10.7 (Deferred Compensation Plan) and 10.8
(Consulting Agreement) to the Companys report on Form 10-K for the period
ended March 31, 2001 and are hereby incorporated by reference.
|    
|(13) |  | A copy of this exhibit filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001 and is incorporated
herein by reference.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|    
|(14) |  | A copy of this exhibit filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2001 and is
incorporated herein by reference.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|    
|(15) |  | A copy of this exhibit filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2001 and is
incorporated herein by reference.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|    
|(16) |  | A copy of this exhibit filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the Companys report on
Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2002 is hereby incorporated by
reference.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|    
|(17) |  | Copies of the exhibits filed to which this footnote applies were filed,
respectively, as Exhibits 4.1 (Bank One Purchase Warrant), 4.2 (Prudential
Purchase Warrant), 4.3 (Bank One Rights Agreement), 4.4 (Prudential Rights
Agreement), 10.1 (Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement) and 10.2
(Prudential Amendment) to the Companys report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 and is incorporated herein by
reference.                                                   
|    
|(18) |  | A copy of this exhibit filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002 and is
incorporated herein by reference.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            



| | (b) |  | Reports on Form 8-K:                                                                                                                                                                               
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |     |  | During the quarter ended March 31, 2002, the Company filed one current
report on Form 8-K. A current report on Form 8-K, dated March 20,
2002, furnished a press release pursuant to Regulation FD.
|
| | (c) |  | Exhibits                                                                                                                                                                                           
|
| |     |  | See Index to Exhibits at Item 14(a) above.                                                                                                                                                       

69



---



##### Table of Contents






SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



| | CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.
| | -----------------------

|                  |  |     |  |                                                                                                           | 
|----------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|February 13, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Joseph W. Rog
Joseph W. Rog
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

|                  |  |                                                                                                                                         | 
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|February 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Joseph W.
Rog
Joseph W. Rog
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|                 
|February 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert M. Mayer

Robert M. Mayer
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)    
|                 
|February 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Michael K. Baach

Michael K. Baach, Director                                                                                       
|                 
|February 13, 2004 |  | David H. Kroon, Director                                                                                                               
|                 
|February 13, 2004 |  | /s/ C. Richard Lynham

C. Richard Lynham, Director                                                                                     
|                 
|February 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Harry W. Millis

Harry W. Millis, Director                                                                                         
|                 
|February 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Neal R. Restivo

Neal R. Restivo, Director                                                                                         
|                 
|February 13, 2004 |  | Warren F. Rogers, Director                                                                                                             

70



---



##### Table of Contents



CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joseph W. Rog, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of CORRPRO
COMPANIES, INC.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the Evaluation Date); and

c)    presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and

6.    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated: February 13, 2004



| | /s/ Joseph W. Rog
Joseph W. Rog
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

71



---



##### Table of Contents



I, Robert M. Mayer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of CORRPRO
COMPANIES, INC.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the Evaluation Date); and

c)    presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and

6.    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated: February 13, 2004



| | /s/ Robert M. Mayer
Robert M. Mayer
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

72