alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois  60604

January 3, 2012

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 10‐3271

DANIEL VIRNICH,

Plaintiff‐Appellant,

v.

JEFFREY VORWALD, et al.,

Defendants‐Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Western District of

Wisconsin.

No. 3:09‐cv‐00340

Barbara B. Crabb,

Judge.

O R D E R

The court’s opinion of December 20, 2011, is hereby amended as follows:

On page 18, footnote 4 is amended by striking the indicated language:

“4

This rule is consistent with federal law and the state law of Illinois and Indiana.  See

Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway & Park District, 557 F.2d 580, 595 (7th Cir. 1977) (federal and

Illinois law), vacated on other grounds, 435 U.S. 992 (1978); Starzenski v. City of Elkhart,

87 F.3d 872, 878 (7th Cir. 1996) (Indiana law); see also Erebia v. Chrysler Plastic Products

Corp., 891 F.2d 1212, 1215 n. 1 (6th Cir. 1989) (“the established rule in the federal courts

is that a final judgment retains all of its preclusive effect pending appeal”); Robi v. Five

Platters, Inc., 838 F.2d 318, 327 (9th Cir. 1988) (same for issue preclusion).”

‐ over ‐
No. 10‐3271 2

The corrected footnote 4 shall read:

“4

This rule is consistent with federal law and the state law of Indiana.  See  Kurek v.

Pleasure Driveway & Park District, 557 F.2d 580, 595 (7th Cir. 1977) (federal law), vacated

on other grounds, 435 U.S. 992 (1978); Starzenski v. City of Elkhart, 87 F.3d 872, 878 (7th Cir.

1996) (Indiana law); see also Erebia v. Chrysler Plastic Products Corp., 891 F.2d 1212, 1215

n. 1 (6th Cir. 1989) (“the established rule in the federal courts is that a final judgment

retains all of its preclusive effect pending appeal”); Robi v. Five Platters, Inc., 838 F.2d

318, 327 (9th Cir. 1988) (same for issue preclusion).”
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

**Waterfowl Identification in the Central Flyway**

##       Ring-Necked Duck (Ringbill, Blackjack)    

----

**Male - Winter**
****

**Body:** Medium-sized duck, 1 1/2 - 2 pounds, 16-18 inches     long. Black back, chest and rump with white crescent on side. Belly white.     Head blackish purple with distinct crest. Faint chestnut ring around neck.     Eyes yellow-orange. Bill gray with white band at base and toward tip. Feet     grayish blue. **Wings:** Greenish-glossed coverts. Speculum pearl     gray with faint white trailing edge. **Voice:***Purr.***In Flight:** Dark head, neck, back and rump contrast with white     belly. Wingbeat fast. Flight formation open.   

**Male - Fall**
****

 Ranging from mottled brownish black with dusky white belly to near-winter     coloration. Faint white crescent on sides. Eyes, bill, feet and wings same     as in winter.   

**Female - All Seasons**
****

**Body:** Blackish brown back. Brown head, neck and sides.     Belly white. Whitish eye-ring and face-patch. Eyes brown. Bill, feet and wings     similar to male. **Voice:** Occasional *purr.*

****

----

Previous Section
Return to Contents
Next Section

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/waterfwl/ringneck.htm		Page Contact Information: Webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 03-Aug-2006 11:32:16 EDT		Sioux Falls, SD [sdww54]
#### CITY OF MIAMI, Petitioner, v. Leonard V. OLSON, Jr., Deceased, et al., Respondents.

No. 44132.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 15, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Anthony MIRANDE, Petitioner, v. Emmett S. ROBERTS, Secretary, State of Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Division of Mental Health, Respondent.

No. 73-588.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 26, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County.

Habeas corpus denied.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

MS 85 Robertson Road Bridge 

Replacement Bridge Replacement

US Forest Service - 

Homochitto National 

Forest

Amite County Amite 2023/ 

2024

MS 94 York Road Bridge Replacement Bridge Replacement

US Fish & Wildlife Service - 

St. Catherine's Creek 

National Wildlife Refuge

Adams County Adams 2023

MS 102 West McHenry Road Bridge 

Replacement Bridge Replacement US Forest Service - Desoto National Forest Stone County Stone 2023/ 2024

MS 115 Perrytown Road Bridge 

Replacements Bridge Replacement

US Forest Service - 

Homochitto National 

Forest

Wilkinson 

County Wilkinson 2023/ 2024

MS 116 Harvey Drive Bridge 

Replacement Bridge Replacement

US Forest Service - 

Homochitto National 

Forest

Lincoln County Lincoln 2023/ 

2024

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Mississippi Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Mississippi FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Mississippi Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2023-2026

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

The Mississippi PDC does not have a firm date for the next Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please bookmark our webpage to watch for

future Calls for Projects in your state. https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/programs-access.

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26806]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted 
the following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the 
Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

    (1) Collection title: Statement of Claimant or Other Person.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: G-93.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0183.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: 12/31/97.
    (5) Type of request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or households, business or other for 
profit.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 900.
    (8) Total annual responses: 225.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 225.
    (10) Collection description: Under Section 2 of the Railroad 
Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, pertinent 
information and proofs must be submitted by an applicant so that the 
Railroad Retirement Board can determine his or her entitlement to 
benefits. The collection obtains information supplementing or changing 
information previously provided by an applicant.
    Additional Information or Comments: Copies of the forms and 
supporting documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency 
clearance officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information 
collection should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement 
Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB 
reviewer, Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 10230, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26806 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
UNITES STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

QUICKLOOK CRITERIA PARAMETERS

Report Request ID: 716899 Report Code: AMP450 Feb. 5, 2010

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: FMC

State County Site Parameter POC City AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

06 027 1001 81102 2006 2009

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS

EVENTS PROCESSING

MERGE PDF FILES

Option Type Option Value

EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

YES

SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Order Column

PARAMETER_CODE

STATE_CODE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

POC

DATES

EDT_ID

Tribal
Feb. 5, 2010

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 1 of 4

EXCEPTIONAL DATA TYPES

EDT DESCRIPTION

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

NO EVENTS

EVENTS EXCLUDED

EVENTS INCLUDED

EXCEPTIONAL EVENTS EXCLUDED

NATURAL EVENTS EXCLUDED

EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED

EXCEPTIONAL EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED

NATURAL EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED
Feb. 5, 2010

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 2 of 4

PM10 Total 0-10um STP (81102) California Micrograms/cubic meter (25 C) (001)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

06-027-1001

06-027-1001

06-027-1001

06-027-1001

06-027-1001

2

4

4

4

4

0458

0458

0458

0458

0458

Coso Junction

Coso Junction

Coso Junction

Coso Junction

Coso Junction

Inyo

Inyo

Inyo

Inyo

Inyo

REST AREA ON 

HIWY 395, 

COSO JUNCTION

REST AREA ON 

HIWY 395, 

COSO JUNCTION

REST AREA ON 

HIWY 395, 

COSO JUNCTION

REST AREA ON 

HIWY 395, 

COSO JUNCTION

REST AREA ON 

HIWY 395, 

COSO JUNCTION

2006

2006

2007

2008

2009

063

079

079

079

079

77

295

283

137

168

N

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

VALID

DAYS

60

235

365

366

365

DAY

MAX

>150

0

1

2

0

1

58

231

363

366

362

%OBS

93

98

99

100

99

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

47

124

217

83

116

34

92

138

71

107

31

78

86

63

99

EST

DAYS

>150

0

1

2

0

1

14.5*

22.5*

19.4 

18.1 

22.4 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN

56

231

363

366

362

NUM

REQ
Feb. 5, 2010

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 3 of 4

81102

81102

063

079

HI-VOL SA/GMW-1200

INSTRUMENTAL-R&P SA246B-INLET

GRAVIMETRIC

TEOM-GRAVIMETRIC

PARAMETER

METHOD

CODE COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS METHOD

METHODS USED IN THIS REPORT
Feb. 5, 2010

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 4 of 4

PQAOS USED IN THIS REPORT

PQAO AGENCY DESCRIPTION

0458 Great Basin Unified APCD
No. 9788.

#### Hall, Admx., *v.*The Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

(Decided December 21, 1906.)

Error, to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Messrs. Hoffman, Bode & Le Blond*and *Mr. B. H. Stites,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Maxwell & Ramsey,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31     CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Kelly Fielder, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, of RedCell Power Corporation, certify that:  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of RedCell Power Corporation;  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.  I and the other certifying officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the Company.  I and the other certifying officers have designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information is made known to us, particularly during the period in which the periodic report is being prepared.  I and the other certifying officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report; and  I and the other certifying officers have presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required evaluation as of that date.  I and the other certifying officers have disclosed to the Companys auditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):  (i) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and  I and the other certifying officers have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.   Dated: March 15, 2007   Kelly Fielder _____________________________________ Kelly Fielder Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### Frederick W. COPELAND, Appellant, v. Clifford L. ALLEN, Appellee.

No. L-451.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 13, 1970.

Frederick W. Copeland, in pro. per.

D. Niel Ferguson, Ocala, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ„ concur.
Documents Needed Prior to Construction

Tribe:

Public Authority:

Project Name:

Docume

nt

Date

25 CFR 170.460 Requirements (Project Package)

1. Plans, specifications, and estimates (25 CFR 170.460(a))

a. Plans (stamped)

b. Specifications (stamped)

c. Engineer’s Estimate

2. Tribal resolution or other authorized document supporting the project. (25 CFR

170.460(b))

3. Certification of compliance with the requirements of 25 CFR part 169, as well as any

additional public taking documentation clearances, if applicable. (25 CFR 170.460(c))

4. Required environmental, archeological, and cultural clearances. (25 CFR 170.460(d))

5. Identification of design exceptions if used in the plans. (25 CFR 170.460(e))

Tribal Transportation Program Agreement Requirement

6. Tribe’s certification that the Public Authority, other than the Tribe or BIA, was afforded

an opportunity to review and comment on the PS&E. (FHWA Tribal Transportation

Program

Agreement Article III, Section 1.C)

BIA-owned Facilities

7. FHWA Tribal Coordinator provides a copy of project package to BIA.

FHWA Tribal Coordinator

Signature: Date:
#### Wido E. De IULIIS, Appellant, v. Tom HAGENBUCH et al., Appellees.

No. 71-22.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 9, 1971.

*149Harry C. Carratt of Morgan, Carratt & O’Connor, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Wilton L. Strickland, of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean & Hallowes, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

REED, Chief Judge.

The appellant, Wido E. De Iuliis, was the plaintiff below. He filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Broward County, Florida, alleging that on 24 February 1969 he was injured as a result of a fall on the premises of defendants Tom and Dorothy Hagenbuch. The cause proceeded to a jury trial in November of 1970. At the conclusion of the evidence the trial court ruled as a matter of law that the plaintiff was a licensee on defendants’ premises at the time of the accident and granted a motion for directed verdict on the ground that no evidence had been presented which would have established defendants’ liability to a licensee. A final judgment was rendered and this appeal followed.

The issue here is whether or not the trial court erred in holding that the plaintiff as a matter of law was a licensee on the premises of the defendants at the time of the accident.

Under the undisputed facts, at the time of the accident the plaintiff was on the defendants’ property at defendants’ request for the purpose of trimming shrubs thereon for an agreed compensation. Under the economic or mutual benefit theory a person is an invitee on another’s land where the former’s presence is for the mutual economic benefit of the parties. McNulty v. Hurley, Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 185. It appears to us that under the facts of this case which are without dispute the plaintiff at the time of the accident was as a matter of law an invitee — not a licensee — on defendants’ premises. We, therefore, hold that the trial court erred when it determined that the plaintiff was a licensee and granted the defendants’ motion for directed verdict. We have not overlooked the case relied on by the defendants, City of Boca Raton v. Mattef, Fla.1956, 91 So.2d 644. We believe it to be so dissimilar factually to the present case that it cannot be considered a controlling precedent.

The judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded for new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STEVE MILLER and FEDERATED FINANCIAL, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-4127

[October 12, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Mily Rodriguez Powell, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-17606 

(03).

Christopher J. Whitelock of Whitelock & Associates, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Zoran D. Jovanovich of Zwicker & Associates, P.C., Deerfield Beach, for

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Name of SEP: SBIR Phase II Topic 48--Automated System for 
Aneuploidy Detection in Sperm (Telephone Conference Call).
    Date: November 17, 1997.
    Time: 1:30 p.m.
    Place: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, East 
Campus, Building 4401, Conference Room 3446, Research Triangle Park, 
NC 27709.
    Contact Person: Dr. Carol Shreffler, National Institute of 
Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27709, (919) 541-1445.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.

    Name of SEP: Risk Factors for Uterine Fibroids: A Case Control 
Study (Telephone Conference Call).
    Date: November 25, 1997.
    Time: 2:30 p.m.
    Place: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, East 
Campus, Building 4401, Conference Room 3446, Research Triangle, NC 
27709.
    Contact Person: Dr. Carol Shreffler, National Institute of 
Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle, NC 
27709, (919) 541-1445.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. Grant 
applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Agents; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation; 93.894, Resource and Manpower Development, National 
Institutes of Health)

    Dated: October 23, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield.
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-28690 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Dear Mr. Adams, 

Tim Sullivan <timsullivan@gci.net> 

Wednesday, June 26, 2013 1:54 PM 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Tatitlik Air Service 

· .. .:j 

- --- ,.,. ' •. -- L.,_ i i - ·. __ ; ··-~ 

With regard to 2013-6-6 Order Re-soliciting Proposals for air service to Tatitlek, I support the proposal submitted by Reeve Air Alaska. 

As best I can tell, all three proposals offer the same level of flight service. The Reeve Air proposal offers the best value for the 

government and the best ticket price for the village. I have flown with Reeve for many years; their safety record and customer service 

are excellent. 

Sincerely, 

Tim Sullivan 

1