alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE IBARRA LOPEZ; FLORENTINA

IBARRA,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73481

Agency Nos. A079-536-171

 A079-539-120

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2013** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Ibarra Lopez and Florentina Ibarra, natives and citizens of Mexico,

petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

FEB 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-73481

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Singh v. INS, 295

F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen as untimely because the motion was filed over three years after the BIA’s

final decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and they failed to present material

evidence of changed circumstances in Mexico to qualify for the regulatory

exception to the time limitation for filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); see also Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 996 (9th Cir. 2008)

(requiring movant to produce material evidence with motion to reopen that

conditions in country of nationality had changed).

In light of our disposition, we do not reach petitioners’ remaining

contentions regarding their prima facie eligibility for relief. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# L_2005290EN.01000301.xml

| 4.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 290/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 290/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1802/2005

of 3 November 2005

amending Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards intervention on the market in butter and cream

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 21 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 (2), lays down that intervention butter placed on sale must have entered into storage before 1 January 2003. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 21 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 (2), lays down that intervention butter placed on sale must have entered into storage before 1 January 2003.

| (2) | Given the situation on the butter market and the quantities of butter in intervention storage it is appropriate that butter in storage before 1 January 2004 should be available for sale. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Given the situation on the butter market and the quantities of butter in intervention storage it is appropriate that butter in storage before 1 January 2004 should be available for sale.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999, the date ‘1 January 2003’ is replaced by the date ‘1 January 2004’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 November 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1008/2005 (OJ L 170, 1.7.2005, p. 30).

2

---
II 

Calendar No. 424 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3765 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 

Medical Services for Children program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2024 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. BUDD, Mr. BOOZMAN, Ms. COLLINS, Ms. SMITH, 

Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. BALDWIN, and Mr. MARSHALL) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

JUNE 18, 2024 

Reported by Mr. SANDERS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the 

Emergency Medical Services for Children program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Medical 

5 Services for Children Reauthorization Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3765 RS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF GRANTS FOR EMERGENCY 

2 MEDICAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN. 

3 Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 300w–9(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘and 

5 $22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘$22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 

7 through 2024, and $24,334,000 for each of fiscal years 

8 2025 through 2029’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 424 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3765 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reaudren program. thorize the Emergency Medical Services for ChilJUNE 18, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP97-454-000 and RP97-258-003 (Not consolidated)]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Technical Conference

October 22, 1997.
    In the Commission's order issued on September 19, 1997, in the 
above-captioned proceedings, the Commission held that the filing raises 
issues for which a technical conference is to be convened.
    The conference to address the issues has been scheduled for 
Wednesday, November 5, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., in a room to be designated 
at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
    All interested persons and Staff are permitted to attend.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28463 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Page 2 of 2

**LOAD RATING SUMMARY**

**REVISED 4/13**

**LOAD RATING SUMMARY**

**REVISED 4/13**

# image1.png
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 6, 2016

d0829 

# Order

Clerk September 6, 2016

151271

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151271

COA: 323567

Wayne CC: 13

- 000281

- FC

CURTIS LEE ROUSE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 10, 2015

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, bec ause we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1 – CEO
Certification








ROYAL INVEST
INTERNATIONAL CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Invest
International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Gruenbaum, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.








By: /s/ Jerry
Gruenbaum


Jerry
Gruenbaum, CEO





May 20,
2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 32005R1786 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005R1786

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1786/2005 of 28 October 2005 concerning the 92nd special invitation to tender issued under the standing invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 **

*
Official Journal L 288 , 29/10/2005 P. 0024 - 0024 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1786/2005

of 28 October 2005

concerning the 92nd special invitation to tender issued under the standing invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products [1], and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Pursuant to Article 26 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 of 17 December 1999 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards the grant of aid for skimmed-milk and skimmed-milk powder intended for animal feed and the sale of such skimmed-milk powder [2], intervention agencies have put up for sale by standing invitation to tender certain quantities of skimmed-milk powder held by them.

(2) According to Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999, in the light of the tenders received in response to each individual invitation to tender a minimum selling price shall be fixed or a decision shall be taken to make no award.

(3) On the basis of the examination of the offers received, the tendering procedure should not be proceeded with.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 92nd individual invitation to tender pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999, in respect of which the time limit for the submission of tenders expired on 25 October 2005, no award shall be made.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann Fischer Boel

Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

[2] OJ L 340, 31.12.1999, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-77648) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan of Cygne Designs,
Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77650) pertaining to the
Stock Option Plan for non-employee Directors of Cygne Designs, Inc. of our
report dated March 26, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Cygne Designs, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 30, 1999 of Cygne
Designs, Inc.



New York, New York
April 29, 1999
1

LEVIN, NANCY

From: Steckel, Andrew

Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 7:01 AM

To: LEVIN, NANCY

Subject: FW: Requested Information

Attachments: image001.gif; AO engine Retrofit analysis.docx; Wood-burning1.docx; Evaluation of Covers 

Lagoons Manure Piles for NH3.docx

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Completed

________________________________________ 

From: Sheraz Gill [Sheraz.Gill@valleyair.org] 

Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 4:34 PM 

To: Steckel, Andrew 

Cc: Drake, Kerry; Kay, Rynda; Perez, Idalia; Law, Nicole; Mays, Rory; Errol Villegas; Anna Myers; Sylvia Vanderspek 

(svanders@arb.ca.gov)

Subject: Requested Information 

Hello Andy, 

Attached is the information requested based on the latest discussions between EPA and the District. Please let me know 

if you have any questions. Thanks 

Sheraz Gill 

Director of Strategies and Incentives 

San Joaquin Valley APCD 

Phone: (559) 230-5908 

Fax: (559) 230-6061 

sheraz.gill@valleyair.org<mailto:sheraz.gill@valleyair.org>

[cid:619554722@16102009-0291]
#### Bobby D. McDANIEL et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Christian MOORE, Charles Hoyer, Jr., and Allstate Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13360.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1977.

Fayard & Beam by Michael W. Beam, Bossier City, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Nelson & Achee, Ltd., by Frank M. Dodson, Shreveport, for defendant-appellee Allstate Ins. Co.

Before PRICE, MARVIN and JONES, JJ.

PRICE, Judge.

Plaintiffs have appealed the judgment sustaining a motion for summary judgment and rejecting their demands against their insurer under the uninsured motorist coverage of the insurance policy.

*856Plaintiffs, husband and wife, allege they were injured while riding a motorcycle on Barksdale Boulevard in Bossier City when a horse suddenly ran into their path and collided with the motorcycle. Suit was brought against the owner of the horse, the operator of the stable where the animal was kept, and Allstate Insurance Company, plaintiffs’ liability insurer.

Allstate moved for a summary judgment contending there was no genuine issue of fact since the uninsured motorist provisions of its policy only afforded coverage to injuries caused by a *motor vehicle*and not damages caused by an animal.

Plaintiffs opposed the motion by affidavit declaring the agent who sold them the policy represented that the uninsured motorist coverage protected them from any injuries caused by the negligence of a third party.

On appeal, plaintiffs reurge this contention and contend the policy should be reformed to conform to the agent’s guarantee. They also urge certain policy language would afford coverage if the horse were shown to be farm equipment designed for use principally off the public roads.

Neither of plaintiffs’ arguments have merit. The representations of an insurance agent cannot be used to extend the coverage beyond that provided by the written policy of insurance. LSA — R.S. 22:628. Also see *Smith v. Republic National Life Insurance Company,*335 So.2d 739 (La.App.2d Cir. 1976).

The definition of an .“uninsured automobile” as contained in the policy is clearly restricted to a motor vehicle, and plaintiffs’ argument relating to “farm equipment” is based solely on an exclusion of certain motorized equipment within the classification of *motor vehicles*which does not pertain to farm animals.

The judgment is affirmed at appellants’ costs.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23

- 0135

_________________ ISAAC DUPUIS,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. ST ATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE DIVISION; UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BO ARD, Defendants AND Appellees. O R D E R

_________________ This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellee ’ s Response brief filed electronically
on August 7, 202 3 , this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the below

- referenced Rule

. M. R. App. P

. 12 (1) (d) requires that a principal brief contain a statement of the facts rel evant to the issues presented for review , “with references to the page s or the parts of the record at which material facts appear. ” While M. R. App. P. 12(1)(i) requires that only the Appell ant ’ s brief contain an appendix , App ellee ’ s b rief cites to an appendix ( “ App. ” ) that is not part of the re cord or filings on appeal

. Appe llee ’ s Response brief must therefore contain the reference d appendix, or must cite directly to the record on appeal

. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is accepted for filing, but within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the Appellee shall electronically file with the Clerk of thi s Court the cited

- to/referenced App ellee ’ s appen dix and serve copies of the appendix on all parties of record ; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions , or deletio ns other than 08/07/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0135those specif ied in this Order may be made to the brief as originally f iled; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief. The Clerk i s directed to provide a tr ue copy of this Order to the Appellee and to all parties o f record.

Electronically signed by: Dirk Sandefur Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 7 2023
# L_2005099EN.01000401.xml

| 19.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 99/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 99/4

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 599/2005

of 18 April 2005

concerning tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender for the export to certain third countries of wholly milled and medium and long grain A rice issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 14(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 14(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders submitted from 11 to 14 April 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the export refund on wholly milled rand, medium and long grain A rice to certain third European countries issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 April 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 353, 27.11.2004, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 61, 7.3.1975, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 18).

3

---
Exhibit
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Bio Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      March 10 2007


By:
            /s/
                David KoosDavid
                KoosChief
                Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
      adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
      of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Frezer,
      Inc. and will be retained by Frezer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.