alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Request for Information Spektiv LLC (FAA-2015-4219) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Harmon: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−4219). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your

petition.

z Describe the aircraft makes, models, and types (i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed 

UAS operation. The descriptions should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information 

can be located in the aircraft manuals.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by December 9. 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 11:04 AM 

To: keon@spectivsolutions.com
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: KEVIN BOYER,

Relator. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 14

- 00182

- CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Re lator, Kevin Boyer, filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in which he complains

that Hon. Richard A. Roman, formerly sitting as Judge of the 34 6th District Court of El Paso

County, denied Relator’s prose motion for post

- conviction DNA testing und er Texas Code of

Criminal Procedure Chapter 64. See T EX .C ODE C RIM .P ROC .A NN

. art. 64.01

- 64.05(West Supp.

2013). Relator asserts the State seized evidence , specifically tennis shoes and a jersey, which

contains biological material

.

Relator presents n o st atement of facts or argument in his petition. See T EX .R.A PP .P.

52.3(g), (h). In his accompanying affidavit, Appellant avers that he served his “Chapter 64

Motion” on the 346 th District Court of El Paso, Texas on March 10, 2014. No copy of Relator’s

moti on for forensic DNA testing was presented to the Court . Relator has not filed a copy of

Respondent’s order denying Relator’s motion for DNA testing. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 52.3(k)(1)(A).2

To be entitled to mandamus relief, Relator must demonstrate that the act he seeks to

compel is ministerial and that he does not have an adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Young v.

Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals , 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007) (orig.

proceeding) . Article 64.05 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides that an appeal

under Chapter 64 is to a court of appeals in the same manner as an appeal of any other non

- capital

criminal matter. T EX .C ODE C RIM .P ROC .A NN

. art. 64.05 (West 2006 ). Because Relator has an

adequate remedy at law, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, Relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus is denied.

August 6, 2014

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do No t Publish)
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Periodic Financial Report


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350




Each of the undersigned officers of Dyax Corp.  (the "Company") certifies, under the standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




Dated: March 2, 2011
/s/ Gustav A. ChristensenGustav A.  ChristensenChief Executive OfficerDated: March 2, 2011
/s/ George MigauskyGeorge MigauskyChief Financial Officer
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: Private  highway-rail grade crossing safety research and inquiry
 
SuDocs Number: TD 3.15:10/02
Item Number:  0701-C  (online)
System  Number: 000863067
Volume I  | Volume II
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  July29, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov
perm |
|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220

April 16, 2010

Ms. Nancy A. Rae

Executive Vice President-Human Resources
Chrysler Group LLC

1000 Chrysler Drive

CIMS 485-08-96

Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326-2766

Re: Proposed Compensation Structures for Certain Executive Officers and Most
Highly Compensated Employees (“Covered Employees 26 — 100”)

Dear Ms. Rae:

Pursuant to the Department of the Treasury’s Interim Final Rule on TARP
Standards for Compensation and Corporate Governance, the Office of the Special Master
has completed its review of your 2010 compensation submission on behalf of employees
who are either executive officers of Chrysler Group LLC (“Chrysler”) or one of the
company’s 100 most highly compensated employees, excluding those employees subject
to Section 30.10 of the Interim Final Rule (“Covered Employees 26 — 100” or “Covered
Employees”).

According to the materials you have submitted, the proposed compensation
structures for Covered Employees 26 — 100 fit within the exemption set forth in Section
30.16(a)(3)(ii) of the Interim Final Rule for employees receiving total annual
compensation (other than long-term restricted stock) not exceeding $500,000. The
proposed compensation structures therefore are automatically deemed to meet the
requirements of the Interim Final Rule, and Chrysler is not required to seek the prior
approval of the Special Master to implement these structures. To the extent the 2010
compensation structure for any Covered Employee, including the amounts that are or
may be payable thereunder, is modified such that the exemption is no longer applicable,
Chrysler is required to notify the Office of the Special Master and seek approval for
further action consistent with the Interim Final Rule. 31 C.F.R. § 30.16(a)(3)(ii).

The foregoing is limited to the proposed compensation structures for Covered
Employees 26 — 100, and may not be relied upon with respect to any other employee of
Chrysler. Moreover, the Office of the Special Master has relied upon, and this letter is
qualified in its entirety by, the accuracy of the materials submitted by Chrysler to the


Office of the Special Master, and the absence of any material misstatement or omission in
such materials.

Very truly yours,

(GA RL

Kenneth R. Feinbe
Office of the Special Master
for TARP Executive Compensation

ce: Holly E. Leese, Esquire
Lawrence Cagney, Esquire
CERTIFICATE
      OF DESIGNATION


SETTING
      FORTH THE PREFERENCES, RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS OF PREFERRED STOCK OF


TORBAY
      HOLDINGS, INC.





Torbay
      Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), certifies that
      pursuant to the authority contained in Article Fourth of its Certificate of
      Incorporation and in accordance with the provisions of Section 151 of the
      General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the Corporation has the
      authority to issue 20,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001
      per share; and, further





The
      Board
      of Directors of the Corporation has the authority to issue any or all of such
      shares in one or more series and by resolution to provide for the designation
      of
      each series to be issued pursuant to the foregoing authority.





The
      Board
      of Directors previously designated 700,000 shares as Series 1 Preferred Stock,
      all of which were issued and subsequently retired, leaving 19,300,000 shares
      undesignated.





The
      Board
      of Directors voted on 07/19/2007 and unanimously adopted the following
      resolution creating a series of its preferred stock to be designated Series
      B
      Preferred Stock and consisting of 10,000,000 shares:





RESOLVED,
      that a series of the authorized preferred stock entitled Series B Preferred
      Stock is hereby created with the following designation, preferences and
      rights:





Designation
      and Amount; Par Value. The shares of such series are designated as Series B
      Preferred Stock (the "Series B Preferred Stock") and the number of shares
      constituting such series is 10,000,000. The par value of each share of the
      series is $0.0001.





Conversion.
      The shares of Series B Preferred Stock are not convertible into common stock
      of
      the Corporation.





Voting.
      Each share of Series B Preferred Stock shall be entitled to sixty votes on
      all
      matters on which such shareholders are lawfully entitled to vote and shall
      be
      entitled to receive notice of or attend any annual or extraordinary meeting
      of
      shareholders of the Corporation.





Dividends
      and Dissolution. The holders of the Series B Preferred Shares shall have the
      same rights regarding dividends and upon dissolution as Common
      Shares.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, TORBAY HOLDINGS, INC. has caused this Certificate of
      Designation to be executed by its President and attested to by its Secretary
      this 19th day of July, 2007.


TORBAY
              HOLDINGS,
              INC.By:
            /s/
              Richard K
              LauerPresidentATTEST:/s/ Richard K LauerSecretary
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP76,765

EX PARTE OMAR MILES WHITE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 03-CR-2990-B IN THE 117TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM NUECES COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of failure to comply

with registration requirements and was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his

conviction. 

Applicant contends his plea was involuntary because the sentence agreed to in the plea

bargain and assessed by the trial court was not authorized by law. Applicant had pleaded guilty to

a third-degree felony, but the proper offense level for his offense was a state jail felony. The trial
2

court has entered findings of fact and recommends granting relief, and the findings and

recommendation are supported by the record provided to this Court.

Relief is therefore granted. The judgment in cause no. 03-CR-2990-Bin the Judicial District

Court of Nueces County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of

Nueces County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any

necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues. It appears Applicant

is also serving a concurrent four-year sentence in a separate cause (no. 07-CR-2896) for a second

failure to register conviction. If Applicant wishes to challenge the second conviction, he must file

a separate application for a writ of habeas corpus regarding that conviction. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. art 11.07 §§ 1-3.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: April 4, 2012

Do Not Publish
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 9:19 AM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

Hi Bob,

Attached are the handouts from this meeting.

Regards, Cortney

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_14_GHGExisitng_NRECA_Handout1.pdf >> << 2060AR33_2014_04_14_GHGExisitng_NRECA_Handout2.pdf >> << 2060AR33_2014_04_14_GHGExisitng_NRECA_Handout3.pdf >>

-----Original Appointment-----

From: Echols, Mabel E. Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guide lines for Existing Power Plants: Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

When: Monday, April 14, 2014 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

Where: Room 10103 New Executive Office Building

This meeting was requested by John Novak, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals,
      Ltd. (the "Company") on FORM 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Phillip W. Ware, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.














Date:
      August 11, 2006


/s/
      Phillip W. Ware


Phillip
      W. Ware


Chief
      Executive Officer, President
      and Principal Financial Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and will be retained by Coastal
      Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT

         THIS  FIRST   AMENDMENT   TO   REGISTRATION   RIGHTS   AGREEMENT   (the
"Amendment"),  dated as of October 26, 2004, by and between  CAMINOSOFT CORP., a
California  corporation  (the  "Company"),  and FUSION CAPITAL FUND II, LLC (the
"Buyer").  Capitalized  terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meanings given them in the Registration Rights Agreement.

         WHEREAS,  the  parties  hereto  are  parties to a  Registration  Rights
Agreement dated as of September 16, 2004 (the  "Registration  Rights Agreement")
pursuant to which the Seller has agreed to provide certain  registration  rights
under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  as  mended,  and the rules and  regulations
thereunder and applicable state securities laws.

         WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Registration Rights Agreement;

         NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the  agreements,  covenants and
     considerations contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

      1.    AMENDMENTS. In Section 2(a) of the Registration Rights Agreement the
            reference  to nine  (9)  million  shares  shall be  changed  to (15)
            fifteen million shares.

      2.    EFFECT OF AMENDMENT/INCORPORATION  OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS.  Except as
            amended as set forth above, the Registration  Rights Agreement shall
            continue  in full  force and  effect.  The  provisions  set forth in
            Section  11  of  the   Registration   Rights  Agreement  are  hereby
            incorporated by reference into this Amendment.

                                    * * * * *
IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Buyer and the Company have caused this First Amendment
to  Registration  Rights  Agreement  to be duly  executed  as of the date  first
written above.

                                            THE COMPANY:

                                            CAMINOSOFT CORP.

                                            By:______________________
                                            Name:
                                            Title:

                                            BUYER:

                                            FUSION CAPITAL FUND II, LLC
                                            BY: FUSION CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
                                            BY: SGM HOLDINGS CORP.

                                            By:_______________________
                                            Name: Steven G. Martin
                                            Title: President
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                             |  |                          
|---------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Subsidiary                   |  | Jurisdiction of Formation
|ACREFI Operating, LLC        |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI Lender, LLC           |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI I TRS, Inc.           |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI T-1, LLC              |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI T-2, LLC              |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI T-3, LLC              |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI T-4, LLC              |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI T-5, LLC              |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI Mezzanine, LLC        |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI Holdings J-II, LLC    |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI Mortgage Lending, LLC |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI Holdings J-1, LLC     |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI Cash Management, LLC  |  | Delaware                 
|                             | 
|ACREFI Holdings W-1, LLC     |  | Delaware
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                                METROCALL, INC.

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   1994        1995        1996
                                                                  -------    --------    --------
<S>                                                               <C>        <C>         <C>
Loss before extraordinary item.................................   $(1,090)   $(15,710)   $(45,455)
  Preferred dividends..........................................        --          --        (780)
                                                                  -------    --------    --------
Loss before extraordinary item attributable
  to common stockholders.......................................    (1,090)    (15,710)    (46,235)
  Extraordinary item...........................................    (1,309)     (4,392)     (3,675)
                                                                  -------    --------    --------
Loss attributable to common stockholders.......................   $(2,399)   $(20,102)   $(49,910)
                                                                  =======    ========    ========
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
  Shares outstanding, beginning of period......................     7,105      10,605      14,626
  Shares issued in acquisitions................................     1,023          --       1,619
  Shares issued for exercise of stock options..................        --          11           2
  Shares issued in 1995 equity offering........................        --       1,052          --
  Shares issued in employee stock purchase plan................        --          --           6
                                                                  -------    --------    --------
  Weighted-average shares outstanding..........................     8,128      11,668      16,253
                                                                  =======    ========    ========
Loss per share before extraordinary item attributable
  to common stockholders.......................................   $ (0.14)   $  (1.34)   $  (2.84)
  Extraordinary item...........................................     (0.16)      (0.38)      (0.23)
                                                                  -------    --------    --------
Loss per share attributable to common stockholders.............   $ (0.30)   $  (1.72)   $  (3.07)
                                                                  =======    ========    ========
</TABLE>
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3813 

To amend title 5, United States Code, relative to the powers of the Inspector 

General of the Department of Justice. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2024 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. LEE, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. 

COONS, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. CRUZ, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. 

WELCH, Ms. BUTLER, and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, relative to the powers 

of the Inspector General of the Department of Justice. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inspector General Ac5 cess Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INVESTIGATIONS OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

7 PERSONNEL. 

8 Section 413 of title 5, United States Code, is amend9 ed— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3813 IS

1 (1) in subsection (b)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and 

3 paragraph (3)’’; 

4 (B) by striking paragraph (3); 

5 (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and 

6 (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and 

7 (D) in paragraph (4), as so redesignated, 

8 by striking ‘‘paragraph (4)’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘paragraph (3)’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘, except with 

11 respect to allegations described in subsection 

12 (b)(3),’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS