alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT

         THIS  FIRST   AMENDMENT  TO  COMMON  STOCK   PURCHASE   AGREEMENT  (the
"Amendment"),  dated as of October 26, 2004, by and between  CAMINOSOFT CORP., a
California  corporation  (the  "Company"),  and FUSION CAPITAL FUND II, LLC (the
"Buyer").  Capitalized  terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meanings given them in the Common Stock Purchase Agreement.

         WHEREAS,  the  parties  hereto are parties to a Common  Stock  Purchase
Agreement dated as of September 16, 2004 (the "Common Stock Purchase Agreement")
pursuant to which the Buyer has agreed to  purchase,  and the Company has agreed
to sell up to $6,000,000 of the Common Stock;

         WHEREAS,  the  parties  desire  to  amend  the  Common  Stock  Purchase
Agreement;

         NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the  agreements,  covenants and
     considerations contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

      1.    AMENDMENTS.  In Section  4(f)  subsection  (iii) of the Common Stock
            Purchase  Agreement  the  reference  to  November  30, 2004 shall be
            changed to January 31, 2005.

      2.    EFFECT OF AMENDMENT/INCORPORATION  OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS.  Except as
            amended as set forth  above,  the Common  Stock  Purchase  Agreement
            shall continue in full force and effect. The provisions set forth in
            Section  11 of  the  Common  Stock  Purchase  Agreement  are  hereby
            incorporated by reference into this Amendment.

                                    * * * * *
IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Buyer and the Company have caused this First Amendment
to Common  Stock  Purchase  Agreement  to be duly  executed as of the date first
written above.

                                              THE COMPANY:

                                              CAMINOSOFT CORP.

                                              By:______________________
                                              Name:
                                              Title:

                                              BUYER:

                                              FUSION CAPITAL FUND II, LLC
                                              BY: FUSION CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
                                              BY: SGM HOLDINGS CORP.

                                              By:_______________________
                                              Name: Steven G. Martin
                                              Title: President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Corrpro Companies, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      (a) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2005 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

Dated: June 29, 2005                           /s/ Robert M. Mayer
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Robert M. Mayer
                                               Chief Financial Officer

      The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
# L_2005301EN.01001001.xml

| 18.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 301/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 301/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1884/2005

of 17 November 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the import of maize issued in Regulation (EC) No 1808/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported into Spain from third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1808/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported into Spain from third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1808/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified, to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified, to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 11 to 17 November 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported maize issued in Regulation (EC) No 1808/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 November 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 November 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 291, 5.11.2005, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1558/2005 (OJ L 249, 24.9.2005, p. 6).

3

---
Exhibit (h)(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Financial Services Firm (“you” or “Intermediary”),

 

As principal underwriter of the DWS Funds, we (or a predecessor firm) or our affiliate have entered into a selling group or other agreement or agreements (the "Agreement") with you to permit you, as applicable, to sell, service, or facilitate trading in shares of the DWS Funds (collectively, the "Shares").  

 

This amendment to the Agreement is entered into as of the date indicated in the signature block below, with an effective date of October 16, 2007, or such earlier date as of which you begin providing the Shareholder information described below, and includes the following provisions: 

 

**1. Agreement to Provide Information.**Intermediary agrees to provide the Fund, upon written request, the taxpayer identification number (“TIN”), the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (“ITIN”), or other government-issued identifier (“GII”), if known, of any or all Shareholder(s) of the account and the amount, date, name or other identifier of any investment professional(s) associated with the Shareholder(s) or account (if known), and transaction type (purchase, redemption, transfer, or exchange) of every purchase, redemption, transfer, or exchange of Shares held through each account maintained by the Intermediary during the period covered by the request.

 

**2. Period Covered by Request.**Requests must set forth a specific period, not to exceed 90 days from the date of the request, for which transaction information is sought. The Fund may request transaction information older than 90 days from the date of the request as it deems necessary to investigate compliance with policies established by the Fund for the purpose of eliminating or reducing any dilution of the value of the outstanding shares issued by the Fund.

 

**3. Form and Timing of Response.**

 

(a)  Intermediary agrees to provide, promptly upon request of the Fund or its designee, the requested information specified in paragraph 1 above. If requested by the Fund or its designee, Intermediary agrees to use best efforts to determine promptly whether any specific person about whom it has received the identification and transaction information specified in paragraph 1 is itself a financial intermediary (“indirect intermediary”) and, upon further request of the Fund or its designee, promptly either (i) provide 

 

----
#### In the Interest of SIDELINGER, John, et al., Children.

No. 73-890.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

.Appeal dismissed.
Employment Agreement between the Company and Nancee R. Berger



Exhibit 10.10 
 
[WEST LOGO TO APPEAR HERE] 
 

	 To:
	 	 Nancee R. Berger
	 	 
	 From:
	 	 Thomas B. Barker
	 	 
	 Date:
	 	 February 10, 2003
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 Re:
	 	 2003 Compensation Plan
	 	 


Your 2003 compensation plan for your employment as
Chief Operating Officer for West Corporation (the “Company”) is as follows: 
 

	1.	 	Your base salary will be $310,000. Should you elect to voluntarily terminate your employment, you will be compensated for your services through the date of your
actual termination per your Employment Agreement. 

 

	2.	 	Effective January 1, 2003, you will be eligible to receive a performance bonus based on year-to-date growth of profits over the same period of the prior year. This
bonus will be calculated by multiplying the year-to-date growth in profits for each quarter by the corresponding profit growth participation factor from the table below, minus bonus paid year-to-date for the respective calendar year.


 

	 Profit Growth

	  	 Profit Growth Participation Factor


	 0%–9.99%
	  	 0

	 10%–14.99%
	  	 .015  

	 15%–19.99%
	  	 .0175

	 20%+
	  	 .0185


 
Please
note that a negative year-to-date profit calculations at the end of any given quarter will result in “loss carry forward” to be applied to the next quarterly year-to-date calculation. All bonuses will be paid within thirty (30) days of the
end of the quarter. 
 

	3.	 	For the purposes of this compensation plan, profit shall be defined as pre-tax profit growth of the Company on a consolidated basis. 

 

	4.	 	All pre-tax, pre-corporate allocation profit and net income objectives are based upon the Company’s operations and will not include profit and income derived
from mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures or other non-operating income unless specifically and individually included upon completion of the transaction. 

 

	5.	 	At the discretion of management, you may receive an additional bonus based on the Company’s and your individual performance. 

 

	6.	 	The benefit plans, as referenced in Section 7(i), shall include insurance plans based upon eligibility pursuant to the plans. If the insurance plans do not provide
for continued participation, the continuation of benefits shall be pursuant to COBRA. In the event Employee’s benefits continue pursuant to COBRA and Employee accepts new employment during the consulting term, Employee may continue benefits
thereafter to the extent allowed under COBRA. In no event shall benefits plans include the 401K Plan or the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan. 

 

	 
	
	 By:
	 	 /s/    NANCEE R.
BERGER        


	 	 	 Employee—Nancee R. Berger
No. 9458.

#### Village of Napoleon *v.*Durbin.

(Decided November 13, 1906.)

Error to the Circuit Court of Henry County.

*Mr. F. M. Hall,*city solicitor; *Mr. James P. Ragan*and *Mr. John C. Ragan,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. W. Campbell,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

**Waterfowl Identification in the Central Flyway**

##       Northern Pintail (Sprig)    

----

**Male - Winter**
****

**Body:** Large-appearing duck, 2 - 2 1/2 pounds, 22-27 inches     long. White over neck, chest and belly. Head brown. Bill bluish with black     strip down middle. Feet gray. Elongated black tail. **Wings:**     Distinct gray with iridescent green speculum bordered on leading edge wth     buff and trailing edge with white. **Voice:***Whistle.***In Flight:** Very elongated body. White neck and belly contrasts     with dark head.   

**Male - Fall**
****

 Ranging from mottled drab grayish brown plumage to a blotchy near-winter     coloration. Bill, feet and wings same as in winter.   

**Female - All Seasons**
****

**Body:** Mottled drab brown. Head dull brown. Bill gray with     small black spots. Feet gray. **Wings:** Mottled brown and buff     with dull brownish speculum. **Voice:** Hoarse *quack*.   

****

----

Previous Section
Return to Contents
Next Section

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/waterfwl/pintail.htm		Page Contact Information: Webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 03-Aug-2006 11:32:16 EDT		Menlo Park, CA [caww54]
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2014-16290]

[[Page 43943]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0119; FRL-9912-19-Region-5]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Illinois; Latham Pool Adjusted Standard

Correction

    In rule document 2014-16290 appearing on pages 40673 through 40675 
in the issue of Monday, July 14, 2014, make the following correction:
    1. On page 40673, in the second column, in the ``DATES'' section, 
the effective date listed on line two ``August 13, 2014'' should read 
``September 12, 2014''.

[FR Doc. C1-2014-16290 Filed 7-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-05-D
```
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3840 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit exchanges from 

effecting transactions in securities issued by natural asset companies, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 29, 2024 

Ms. LUMMIS (for herself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. RISCH, Mr. RICKETTS, Mr. 

MARSHALL, Mr. LEE, Mr. COTTON, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. 

LANKFORD, and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 

Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit 

exchanges from effecting transactions in securities issued 

by natural asset companies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect America’s 

5 Lands Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3840 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION WITH RESPECT TO EFFECTING 

2 TRANSACTIONS IN SECURITIES ISSUED BY 

3 NATURAL ASSET COMPANIES. 

4 Section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 

5 U.S.C. 78f) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(m) PROHIBITION WITH RESPECT TO EFFECTING

7 TRANSACTIONS IN SECURITIES ISSUED BY NATURAL

8 ASSET COMPANIES.— 

9 ‘‘(1) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term 

10 ‘natural asset company’— 

11 ‘‘(A) means a company— 

12 ‘‘(i) that holds the rights to the eco13 logical performance (including value from 

14 natural assets and the production of eco15 system services) of a defined land area and 

16 has the authority to manage that area for 

17 conservation, restoration, or sustainable 

18 management; and 

19 ‘‘(ii) the primary purpose of which, 

20 with respect to the defined land area de21 scribed in clause (i), is to— 

22 ‘‘(I) manage, maintain, restore, 

23 and grow the value of natural assets 

24 and the production of ecosystem serv25 ices in the area; or 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3840 IS

1 ‘‘(II) carry out activities that do 

2 not cause any material adverse impact 

3 on the condition of the natural assets 

4 in the area and replenish the natural 

5 resources used in the area; and 

6 ‘‘(B) includes any company that controls, 

7 is controlled by, or is under common control 

8 with a company described in subparagraph (A). 

9 ‘‘(2) PROHIBITION.—It shall be unlawful for a 

10 national securities exchange registered under sub11 section (b) to effect a transaction in a security 

12 issued by a natural asset company.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-718.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CIVIL AVIATION 

Safety 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and INDIA 

Signed at New Delhi July 18, 2011 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 INDIA 

Civil Aviation: Safety 

 Agreement signed at New Delhi 

 July 18, 2011; 

 Entered into force July 18, 2011.
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.

Washington, DC 20590

JUL 1 7 2019 

In Reply Refer to: HCR-20 

DOT# 20 I 9-0 l 72 

Subject: Dismjssal ofComplaint DOT# 2019-0 l72 

Dear

This letter is to infon11 you that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office ofCivil 

Rights has detem1ined that it will dismiss the above complaint. Your complaint alleges actions 

that may be related to discrimination on the basis ofsex in violation ofSection 324, Title 23 of 

the U.S. Code, as implemented in the FHWA's regulations at 23 C.F.R. Part 200. 

To be accepted for investigation, a complaint must meet the jmisdictional requirements provided 

by 49 C.F.R. § 21.11, as well as the legal standards discussed in the U.S. Department ofJustice 

Title VI Legal Manual. First, complaints must be filed within 180 calendar days ofthe alleged 

discriminatory act, unless the time for filing is extended by FHWA. Second, the matters must 

concern recipients offederal financial assistance for a program or programs autbori.zed under a 

law administered by FHWA. Finally, the complaint must describe an alleged discriminatory act 

or acts that, iftrue, would fall under FHWA's jurisdiction and potentially violate FHWA's sex 

discrimination regulations. 

You allege the Oklahoma Department ofTransportation (ODOT) discriminated against you on 

the basis ofsex during the ROW/relocation process. Specifically, you allege that ODOT offe.red 

more generous and more fair relocation benefits, as well as less hostile communications to a 

male business owner than to you regarding your business relocation. 

After careful consideration, FHWA has determined the allegations and facts in your complaint 

do not mee,t the minimum criteria under which FHWA could establish a case ofdisparate 

treatment under 23 U.S.C. § 324. The available data and infom1ation show that your business is 

likely not similarly situated to the business you allege received better treatment. In addition, the 

available information is insufficient to show contemporaneous statements from decision-makers 

that expresses a discriminatory motive based on sex. For these reasons, this complaint will be 

dismissed by FHWA and closed with no further action. 

If you have any questions, please contact Nichole McWhorter at (202) 366-1396. 
1,;'1,le McWhorte 

Title VI Team Lead r 

Office of Civil Rights 

cc: Basharat Siddiqi, Division Administrator, FHW A OK Division Office 

Louisa Ward, Assistant Division Administrator, FHW A OK Division Office 

Steve Duskin, Civil Rights Specialist, FHW A OK Division Office 

Jim Esselman, Senior Attorney-Advisor, FHW A Office of Chief Counsel 

Yvette Rivera, Associate Director, Equal Employment Opportunity Programs Division, 

Departmental Office of Civil Rights 

Kevin Resler, National Title VI Program Coordinator, FHW A Office of Civil Rights 

Page 2 of2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00701-CV

GLOBAL GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

Ramona JONES,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Travis County, Texas

Trial Court No. C-1-CV-12-002293

Honorable J. David Phillips, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee Ramona Jones recover her costs of this appeal from 

appellant Global General Construction Services, LLC. 

SIGNED May 8, 2013.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

VT-04 Churchill Road Bridge Bridge Replacement U.S. Forest Service - Green 

Mountain National Forest Town of Brandon Rutland 2017

VT-05 Henshaw Road Roadway Rehabilitation

U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service - Silvio O. Conte 

National Wildlife Refuge

Town of Brighton Essex 2018

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Vermont Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Vermont FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Vermont Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2018

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The Vermont PDC does not have a firm date for the 

next Call for Projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. 

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.