alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department 

Of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration

400 Seventh St., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

May 18, 1989 

Refer to: HNG-14/SS-11 

Mr. Dragan Stevanovic 

Manager, New Markets 

Allied Tube and Conduit 

16100 South Lathrop Avenue 

Harvey, Illinois 60426 

Dear Mr. Stevanovic: 

In your April 10 letter to Mr. Hatton you requested Federal Highway Administration 

(FHWA) acceptance of a 14-gauge Qwik-Punch sign post set in an unreinforced 12-

gauge foundation sleeve as meeting the breakaway requirements, based on the 1985 

AASHTO Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, 

Luminaires and Traffic Signals, adopted by FHWA by Federal Register Notice dated 

January 5, 1989. 

The cross-section dimensions of the posts for which you requested acceptance were not 

specified in our letter. However, in support of your request you cited out October 3, 

1986, letter to Mr. Ronald C. Steininger in which we indicated acceptance of posts up to 

those having outside dimensions of 2.25 x 2.25 inches. Thus, we infer the maximum size 

post for which you are seeking acceptance is 2.25 x 2.25 inches x 14 –gauge. 

One of the post designs accepted by out October 1986 letter included a 12-gauce, 2.5 x 

2.5 x 30 inches anchor section reinforced with a 3/16-inch wall x 3 x 3x 18-inch sleeve at 

the top. This assembly is set 27 inches into the ground and the signpost is set 15 inches 

into the anchor. The post is held in position by a 3/8-inch, grade 2 bolt located 

approximately 1⁄2-inch below the top of the anchor assembly and passing through the 

sleeve, anchor, and post. Essentially your current request is for acceptance of removal of 

the 18-inch reinforcement sleeve from the anchor assembly. From our review of the test 

results upon which the original acceptance was based and those of single-section, directbury posts set 48 inches into the ground, also covered in our October 1986 acceptance 

letter, we see no reason to believe the removal of the reinforcement sleeve would 

adversely affect the breakaway performance of the support. Therefore, FHWA will find 

acceptable on Federal-aid projects, if proposed by a highway agency, 12-gauge post 

anchors holding 14-gauge sign posts in sizes up to 2.25 x 2.25 inches. In sizes of 2 x 2 
inches x 14-gauge and smaller, a maximum of two such posts within a 7-foot path will 

also be acceptable. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 L. A. Staron, Chief 

 Federal-Aid and Design Division 

Federal Highway Administration 

HNG-14:Jhatton:gm:5-15-89:61329 

Copies to: 

HED-1 HNG-1 HNG-10 HNG-14 Reader, 3212 

Reader, 3128 Reader, 3206 Files, 3128
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10i2

Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements, among Fortune Brands,
Inc. (the "Company") and The Northern Trust Company, et al., establishing an
employee grantor trust in favor of each of the following persons, to the Amended
and Restated Trust Agreement constituting Exhibit 10i1 to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

________________________________________________________________________________

                                                 NAME

                                            Thomas J. Flocco
                                            Mark Hausberg
                                            Craig P. Omtvedt
                                            Mark A. Roche
                                            Norman H. Wesley
Step 1                    Identify                    Stakeholders                

                    Step 2                    Use                    Safety Data                

                    Step 3                    Choose Proven                    Solutions                

                    Step 4                    Implement                    Solutions                

                    Finish Line                

# Cross-cutting Solutions Videos

Content will open in a new window

## Tools and Resources

Countermeasures
              - FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures
              - NHTSA Countermeasures That Work
              - NHTSA Countermeasures That Work 9th Edition

Training
              - Systemic Approach Training – Part 2
              - Low-Cost Safety Improvements Training
              - Select Countermeasures Video

Helpful Links
              - FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures
              - FHWA Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

 

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


The Board of Directors
Morrison Knudsen Corporation


We consent to incorporation by reference in Morrison Knudsen Corporation's
registration statement (No. 033-81038) on Form S-8 and Amendment No. 1 thereto
relating to the Company Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, registration
statement (No. 333-32511) on Form S-8 relating to the registrant's 1997 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors, and registration statement
(No. 333-39351) relating to the registrant's Deferred Compensation Plan, of our
report dated January 12, 1996, relating to the consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows of Kasler Holding Company and
subsidiaries for the year ended November 30, 1995, which report appears in the
Morrison Knudsen Corporation's November 30, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K.



                                    /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Los Angeles, California
February 4, 1998
Order filed, March 16, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00041-CR

____________

RODNELL HERBERT TURNER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1605840

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 10, 2020. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Mattie Kimble, the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

MO-19 Berryman Road (County Road 

207)

Roadway 

Reconstruction

U.S. Forest Service - Mark 

Twain National Forest

Washington 

County Washington 2015

MO-21 County Road 151 Roadway 

Reconstruction

National Park Service - 

Ozark National Scenic 

Riverway

Carter County Carter 2017

MO-22 Overlay at Longview Lake Roadway Resurfacing U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers - Longview Lake

Jackson County 

Parks and 

Recreation

Jackson 2017

MO-23 Ocsceola Landing Boat Launch Low Water Boat Launch 

Construction

U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers - Truman Lake City of Osceola St. Clair 2017

MO-28 Berryman Campground Road Roadway Resurfacing U.S. Forest Service - Mark 

Twain National Forest

Washington 

County Washington 2018

MO-29 Route T Resurfacing Roadway Resurfacing U.S. Forest Service - Mark 

Twain National Forest

MO Department 

of 

Transportation

Christian 2018

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Missouri Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Missouri FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Missouri Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2018

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County Fiscal Year*

MO-31 Brady Lane Access 

Improvements

Roadway Resurfacing & 

Turn Lane Construction

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

- Big Muddy National 

Wildlife Refuge

Cooper County Cooper 2017

MO-32 Grant Road Access Lane Turn Lane Construction

National Park Service - 

Ulysses S. Grant National 

Historic Site

Grantwood 

Village St. Louis 2016

MO-35 USACE Access Improvements

Intersection 

Improvements & Turn 

Lane Construction

U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers - Truman Lake City of Warsaw Benton 2016

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The Missouri PDC does not have a firm date for the next 

Call for Projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. 

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
#### Kenneth CANTRELL, Individually, and Urban Homes of Muscle Shoals, Inc., a corporation v. Rayburn BEVEL. Rayburn BEVEL and Rayburn Bevel Paving & Construction Co. v. Kenneth CANTRELL, etc.

77-51, 77-51X.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 24, 1978.

Ronald P. Thompson, Albertville, for appellant and cross-appellee.

William D. Jetton, Guntersville, for ap-pellee and cross-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

On the appeal, the judgment is affirmed. Rule 9(a), ARCP. On the cross appeal, the judgment is affirmed. Rule 28(a)(3), ARAP.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
#### Coretha EDWARDS, as widow of Theodore Edwards, deceased, and Coretha Edwards, Individually, Appellant, v. Sam SPARKS, Reliance Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, Caviness Motor Corporation, a Florida corporation, and Glens Falls Insurance Group, a New York corporation, Appellees.

No. N-250.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 19, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         137,287
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               412,038
<PP&E>                                         133,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                (36,384)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 765,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          219,398
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,918
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,170,290)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   765,168
<SALES>                                        178,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               178,053
<CGS>                                           61,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,353,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (1,237,132)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (14,062)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (825,204)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (775,083)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (775,083)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3647 

To amend the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism 

Act to use funds in the lump sum catch-up payment reserve fund to 

make payments to Iran hostages and their families. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2024 

Mr. WARNOCK (for himself and Mr. VANCE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Justice for United States Victims of State 

Sponsored Terrorism Act to use funds in the lump sum 

catch-up payment reserve fund to make payments to 

Iran hostages and their families. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for Former 

5 American Hostages in Iran Act of 2024’’. 


dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3647 IS

1 SEC. 2. JUSTICE FOR UNITED STATES VICTIMS OF STATE 

2 SPONSORED TERRORISM. 

3 Subsection (d)(4)(D)(iv)(IV) of the Justice for 

4 United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act 

5 (34 U.S.C. 20144(d)(4)(D)(iv)(IV)) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating item (bb) as item (dd); 

7 (2) by inserting after item (aa) the following: 

8 ‘‘(bb) IRAN HOSTAGES.— 

9 There are authorized to be ap10 propriated and there are appro11 priated to the Fund such sums 

12 as are necessary to make full and 

13 complete payments for amounts 

14 outstanding and unpaid on 

15 claims under subparagraphs (B) 

16 and (C) of subsection (c)(2), 

17 which shall be paid by the Fund 

18 on the claims not later than 30 

19 days after the date of enactment 

20 of this item. 

21 ‘‘(cc) LIMITATION.— 

22 Amounts appropriated pursuant 

23 to item (bb) may not be used for 

24 a purpose other than to make 

25 payments under this clause.’’; 


dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3647 IS

1 (3) in item (cc), as so redesignated, by inserting 

2 ‘‘item (bb) or’’ before ‘‘subclauses’’; and 

3 (4) in item (aa), by striking ‘‘disperses’’ and in4 serting ‘‘disburses’’. 

Æ 


dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1







                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Optical Sensors Incorporated of our report dated February 12, 1998, included
in the 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of Optical Sensors Incorporated.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-04373) pertaining to the Optical Sensors Incorporated 1989
Omnibus Stock Option Plan and the Optical Sensors Incorporated 1993 Stock Option
Plan and, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-17493) pertaining to
the Optical Sensors Incorporated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of our report
dated February 12, 1998, with respect to the financial statements of Optical
Sensors Incorporated, incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 27, 1998
Exhibit 4(d)  


        PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY        P. O. BOX
2606        BIRMINGHAM,
ALABAMA        35202-2606  


DEATH BENEFIT ENDORSEMENT  


We
are amending your Contract as described below: 


	1.
	The
first paragraph of the provision entitled "Death Benefit" in the "DEATH BENEFIT"
section of your Contract is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the two paragraphs below: 




Death Benefit—The death benefit will be determined as of the end of the Valuation Period during which we receive due proof of death. The
death benefit will equal the greater of: (1) the Contract Value; or (2) aggregate Purchase Payments less an adjustment for each surrender. For the purpose of calculating the death
benefit, the adjustment for each surrender will equal the amount that reduces the death benefit in the same proportion that the amount surrendered reduced the Contract Value as of the Valuation Period
during which that surrender was taken. 


Only
one death benefit is payable under this Contract, even though the Contract may, in some circumstances, continue beyond the time of an Owner's death. 




	2.
	An
"Enhanced Spousal Continuation Benefit" provision is added to the "DEATH BENEFIT"
section of your Contract. 




Enhanced Spousal Continuation Benefit—If a Beneficiary who is the surviving spouse of a deceased Owner elects, in lieu of receiving the
death benefit, to continue the Contract and become the new Owner as provided in the Contract, we will add to the Contract Value an amount equal to the positive difference, if any, between:
1) the value of the Contract's death benefit; and, 2) the Contract Value; both determined as of the date we receive due proof of death. We will allocate the amount we add
according to the Purchase Payment instructions then in effect, but the amount we add will not be considered a Purchase Payment." 





Signed
for the company and made a part of the contract as of the Effective date. 



	PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY	 	 
	

/s/  DEBORAH J. LONG      	
 	

 
	

Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28730]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--MD Consult, LLC

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 30, 1997, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), MD Consult, LC has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) 
the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed 
for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery 
of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of 
the parties are: Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St. Louis, MI; W.B. Saunders, 
Philadelphia, PA; and WK Medical, Inc., Chicago, IL. MD Consult will 
consider applications for new membership as they are submitted.
    The nature and objective of the joint venture is to produce the 
most advanced and comprehensive on-line information and communications 
service for physicians and others in the medical-scientific community 
and to increase the availability and distribution of leading medical 
references and daily medical news via the World Wide Web. To accomplish 
its objective, MD Consult intends to engage in the collection, 
exchange, and where appropriate, licensing and dissemination of 
research and intellectual property information, and to work closely 
with educational, governmental, and private agencies to enhance the 
accessibility of medical research information.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-28730 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 23.b



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  33-73148)  pertaining to the Starcraft  Automotive  Corporation  401(k)
Profit  Sharing  Plan and Trust,  in the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.
33-70030)  pertaining to the Starcraft  Automotive  Corporation  Stock Incentive
Plan, and in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-28247)  pertaining to
the Starcraft  Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated January
12, 1998,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements of Starcraft
Corporation and Subsidiaries  included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
years ended September 28, 1997 and September 29, 1996.


\s\ Ernst & Young LLP

Fort Wayne, Indiana
January 8, 1999






<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.b



                         Report of Independent Auditors


To the Board of Directors
Starcraft Corporation

We have audited the consolidated  financial statements of Starcraft  Corporation
and  Subsidiaries  as of September 28, 1997 and for each of the two years in the
period ended September 28, 1997 and have issued our report thereon dated January
12, 1998. Our audits also included the information for the years ended September
28, 1997 and September 29, 1996 in the financial  statement  schedule  listed in
Item 14 of this  Annual  Report.  This  schedule  is the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audit.

In our  opinion,  the  financial  statement  schedule  referred  to above,  when
considered  in  relation  to the basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,
presents  fairly in all material  respects the  information  as of September 28,
1997 and for each of the two years in the period  ended  September  28, 1997 set
forth therein.

\s\ Ernst & Young

January 12, 1998
Fort Wayne, Indiana
INDIANA - AGENCY CONTACTS

1

IN State Indiana 

Department of 

Transportation

Mike Cales Special Programs Manager mcales@indot.IN.gov 317-232-5021

IN State Indiana 

Department of 

Transportation

Ann M. Bishop Grants and Special 

Initiatives Coordinator

ABishop1@indot.IN.gov (317) 234-7935

IN LPA LPA Kevin Russel President, Indiana 

Association of County 

Engineers and Supervisors

k.russel@harrisoncounty.in.gov 812-738-4600

IN FHWA FHWA EFL Jacinda Russell Access Program Manager Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov 571-434-1543

IN FHWA FHWA DO Karen Bobo ADA karen.bobo@dot.gov 317-226-7483

IN FLMA NPS Bob Kammel Midwest Region FLTP 

Coordinator

Bob_kammel@nps.gov 402-575-8775

IN FLMA FWS Brandon Jutz Regional Coordinator, 

Refuge Roads Program

Brandon_Jutz@fws.gov 612-713-5407

IN FLMA FWS Nathan Caldwell US Fish and Wildlife 

Service Transit and Trails 

Coordinator

nathan_caldwell@fws.gov 703-358-2205

IN FLMA USFS Kevin Contardi R9 

Transportation/Highway 

Engineer

kcontardi@fs.fed.us 414-297-1170

IN FLMA USFS Rosana Barkawi Transportation System 

Development and FHWA 

Liaison Program Manager

rosanabarkawi@fs.fed.us 703-605-4509

IN FLMA DOD 

(non-USACE)

Jason Cowin Senior Engineer/HNDSDDCTEAJason.W.Cowin.civ@mail.mil 618-220-5229

IN FLMA DOD (USACE) Jeff Defosse Natural Resources 

Program Manager

Jeff.A.Defosse@usace.army.mil 513-684-3192
Order entered May 9, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00421-CR

GEORGE RALPH BEACHEM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-82711-2019

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s May 3, 2022 motion for an extension of time 

to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received along with 

the motion filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE