alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.25

                   U.S. PAGING SERVICES, INC.
                    6140-C Northbelt Parkway
                     Norcross, Georgia 30071

July 2, 1996

OfficeMax, Inc.
3605 Warrensville Center Road
Shaker Heights, Ohio 44122-5203

Gentlemen:

     This will confirm our understanding with respect to the
OfficeMax, Inc. ("OfficeMax") marketing program of pagers and
pager products using the services of U.S. Paging Services, Inc.
("USPS") on a mutually non-exclusive basis.

     OfficeMax intends to use USPS as its non-exclusive pager
activation service for the purpose of providing access to paging
services for its customers who purchase pagers in its selected
retail stores.

     OfficeMax has agreed to purchase the pagers directly from
GTE according to the price list attached hereto as Exhibit A and
GTE has agreed to be responsible for the payment of the shipping
costs which it incurs in shipping pagers directly to OfficeMax's
customers.

     USPS will maintain a toll-free 800 number to permit
OfficeMax customers to order pager service activation and to make
inquiries regarding the operation of the pagers and service
rates.

     USPS shall pay OfficeMax an advertising co-op amount of
$2.00 for each sale and activation of a pager provided that the
subscriber (1) prepays for the service in the amount of $25.00 at
the time of activation of the pager or within ten days thereafter
and (2) maintains active and current service for 90 consecutive
days.  USPS shall pay OfficeMax a commission of $.50 per month
for each month in which the subscriber maintains active and
continuous service under either a Standard Numeric or Alpha
Numeric rate plan for the first twenty-four (24) months and $.25
per month thereafter.  USPS shall pay OfficeMax a commission of
$.25 per month for each month in which the subscriber maintains
active and continuous service under the FamilyLink program.
Additional MDF to be provided by USPS on as needed basis to
promote the paging category.


<PAGE>
<PAGE>

     All commissions will be paid on the 20th day of the month
following the month in which the 90 day period ends.  USPS will
furnish a month-to-day and year-to-date report on the 15th day of
each month which will set forth activation dates and payment
terms for subscribers activated during the period covered.

     It is understood that USPS shall not be required to offer
competitive paging products sold by OfficeMax or process pager
activations for carriers that are not under contract to USPS in
any USPS kiosk installed and operated by USPS or its affiliates
in any OfficeMax retail location.

     It is our understanding that these are the terms under which
the OfficeMax pager sales program will proceed on a mutually non-
exclusive basis.

     We look forward to working with you in achieving a
successful program.

Very truly yours,

U.S. PAGING SERVICES, INC.
By: /s/ Eric Arnold
     Eric Arnold, General Manager

Approved:
OFFICEMAX, INC.
By: /s/ David Thompson
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

VA 51 High Knob Capital 

Improvements- Phase 2 Roadway Resrufacing

US Forest ServiceWashington & Jefferson 

National Forest

VDOT Scott

PE 2023 

CN 2026

VA 53 Birthplace of America Trail Bicycle/Pedestrian 

Facility

National Park ServiceColonial National Historic 

Park

Newport News Newport 

News

2024

VA 54 Appalachian Trail Safety ProjectUS 11

Bicycle/Pedestrian 

Facility

National Park ServiceAppalachian Trail/ US 

Forest serviceWashington & Jefferson 

National Forest

VDOT Smyth PE 2023 

CN 2024

VA 57 Route 643 Cripple Creek 

Parking Parking Lot Facility

US Forest ServiceWashington & Jefferson 

National Forest

VDOT Wythe 2023

VA 60 Route 603 Lewis Fork Parking Parking Lot Facility

US Forest ServiceWashington & Jefferson 

National Forest

VDOT Grayson 2023

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Virginia Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear Program 

of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Virginia FLAP are listed below by application number and include:

Virginia Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2023-2026
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County Fiscal Year*

VA 61 Route 600 Elk Garden Parking Parking Lot Facility

US Forest ServiceWashington & Jefferson 

National Forest

VDOT Grayson 2023

VA 64 Rockfish Gateway Trail Bicycle/Pedestrian 

Facility

National Park ServiceShenandoah National 

Park, Appalachian Trail & 

Blue Ridge Parkway

City of 

Waynesboro Augusta 2024

VA 69 Sugar Hollow Reservoir 

Trailhead

Roadway 

Resrufacing/Parking 

lot/Trailhead

National Park ServiceShenandoah National ParkAlbemarle 

County Albemarle 2023/ 2024

Virginia Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2023-2026

The PDC does not have a firm date for the next Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please bookmark our webpage to watch for future Calls for Projects 

in your state. https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/programs-access

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. 

For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 571-434-1543 or 

Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
#### Benny M. WEEKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. David B. SURREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 70-132, 70-133.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 20, 1970.

*204Kenneth E. Easley, Clearwater, for appellant Benny M. Weeks.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant David B. Surrey.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and John A. Zebedee, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

LILES, Judge.

Appellants Weeks and Surrey were charged by information with the robbery of a service station in Pinellas County. They were tried by a jury and found guilty.

The state produced a witness at the trial who testified concerning the events on the night of the robbery. This witness testified that he drove the codefendants to their home to obtain clothing with which to commit the robbery, and then drove them to the alleged area of the robbery. Weeks and Surrey left the car and returned sometime later saying they had robbed a service station. One of the defendants had a rifle, and the state’s witness identified it in court.

The state’s next witness was a service station attendant who testified that he was robbed on the night in question by two unknown persons, and that one of the robbers had a rifle.

Benny Weeks’ sister, Linda Fay Weeks, testified for the defense that defendant Surrey was with her in Louisiana on the night of the robbery. During cross-examination of this witness, and in closing argument, the state attorney referred to Miss Weeks as an “acid head.”

Appellants raise these issues on appeal:

1) The evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict because of inconsistencies in the testimony of one of the state witnesses.

2) The remarks made by the state attorney that Miss Weeks was an “acid head” were prejudicial and resulted in an unfair trial.

3) A rifle allegedly used in the robbery was improperly admitted in evidence.

Having examined the record, we find that there is no merit to any of these arguments. The state presented evidence to establish the elements of the crime and the connection of the defendants with the crime. At this point it became the province of the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight of the evidence. Fast v. State, Fla.App.1966, 193 So.2d 210.

The question of Miss Weeks’ use of “acid” came up on cross-examination and was a proper subject for cross-examination. Remarks by the state attorney in closing argument that Miss Weeks was an acid head were perhaps over zealous and unwise, however, there was no objection made at the trial and this court therefore cannot review the challenged argument. State v. Jones, Fla.1967, 204 So.2d 515.

As to the admission of the rifle into evidence, appellant’s arguments go to the weight of the evidence, not to its admissibility. Mobley v. State, 41 Fla. 621, 626, 26 So. 732 (1889) ; Hunt v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 626.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and MANN, J., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 5
 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a), PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Cinram International Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Isidore PhilosopheName:
    
    Isidore PhilosopheTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 DAVID C. MONTOYA,

3 Petitioner-Appellant,

4 v. No. 32,377

5 CARMELA MONTOYA

6 SANDOVAL,

7 Respondent-Appellee.

8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY

9 Eugenio S. Mathis, District Judge

10 David C. Montoya

11 Las Vegas, NM

12 Pro Se Appellant

13 Carmela M. Montoya Sandoval

14 Las Vegas, NM

15 Pro Se Appellee

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 SUTIN, Judge.
2

1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 AFFIRMED.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

6 __________________________________

7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________

10 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge

11 _________________________________

12 JAMES J. WECSLER, Judge
Exhibit 23.1





logoPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants
111 5 Avenue SW, Suite 3100
Calgary, Alberta
Canada T2P 5L3
Telephone +1 403 509 7500
Facsimile +1 403 781 1825





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 of Advantage Oil and Gas Ltd. of our report dated March 16, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for each of the years then ended and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of Advantage Oil and Gas Ltd. as at December 31, 2009.
   
  Chartered Accountants
 Calgary, Alberta
 March 16, 2010
 
 
                   “PricewaterhouseCoopers” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the
 PricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network, each of which is a separate legal entity.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

NH-02 Reconstruction of Saint 

Gaudens Road

Roadway 

Reconstruction

National Park Service - 

Saint Gaudens National 

Historic Site

New Hampshire 

DOT

Sullivan

NH-03 Umbagog Lake Public Boat 

Access 

Seasonal Floating 

Dock Installation

U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service - Umbagog National 

Wildlife Refuge

New Hampshire 

Fish and Game 

Department

Coos

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the New Hampshire Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its initial, 

multiyear Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the New Hampshire FLAP are listed below in no particular order and 

New Hampshire Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2013-2014

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. Funding for these projects is not guaranteed. Funding 

beyond 2014 is dependent on reauthorization of the Access Program by Congress. The New Hampshire PDC does not have a firm date for the next 

call for projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. If you have any questions please contact David 

Payne, Access Program Manager, at 571-434-1543 or email at David.Payne@dot.gov.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

WILLIE JONES, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-2746

LT Case No. 2015-CF-3098

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed March 28, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Marion County, 

Steven G. Rogers, Judge.

Willie Jones, Lowell, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
th
 /s/ Karen M. Bohn
    
    /s/ John D. EricksonKaren M. Bohn
    
    John D. Erickson/s/ Arvid R. Liebe
    
    /s/ John C. MacFarlaneArvid R. Liebe
    
    John C. MacFarlane/s/ Edward J. McIntyre
    
    /s/ Kevin G. MougEdward J. McIntyre
    
    Kevin G. Moug/s/ Nathan I. Partain
    
    /s/ Joyce Nelson SchuetteNathan I. Partain
    
    Joyce Nelson Schuette/s/ Gary J. Spies
    
    /s/ James B. StakeGary J. Spies
    
    James B. Stake
<PAGE>


                                                                Exhibit 10.12(a)

                               INSTRUMENT AMENDING

                            LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY

                               RETIREMENT PLAN FOR

                             NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

     LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY hereby amends the Lyondell Chemical Company
Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors as follows:

     ARTICLE 1, DEFINITIONS, Section 1.12, Pay, is amended to read as follows:

     1.12. Pay for purposes of the Plan means an amount equal to one-twelfth of
     the first $40,000 of the annual retainer paid to a Non-Employee Director
     immediately preceding the earlier of termination of Service on the Board or
     death. In the event of a Change in Control, as determined under Section
     5.3, Pay means an amount equal to one-twelfth of the first $40,000 of the
     annual retainer paid to a Non-Employee Director immediately preceding the
     Change in Control, but if the annual retainer has been reduced in
     anticipation of the Change in Control, the amount shall equal one-twelfth
     of the first $40,000 of the annual retainer paid to a Non-Employee Director
     immediately prior to its reduction. Pay does not include fees paid for
     committee chairmanships or any other special director compensation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being duly authorized on behalf of the
Company, has executed this Instrument on this 24th day of February, 2003.

Attest:                                  LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY


   /s/ JoAnn L. Beck                     By:   /s/ John A. Hollinshead
--------------------                       ----------------------------------
Assistant Secretary                         John A. Hollinshead, Vice President,
                                            Human Resources
#### George F. RISI, Appellant, v. T. E. STEPHENS, Appellee.

No. 69-372.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 29, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Hon. Roger F. Dykes, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

DC-05 Normanstone Culvert & 

Stormwater Project

Roadway resurfacing & 

drainage improvements

National Park Service - 

Rock Creek Park DDOT NA 2016

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the District of Columbia Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its 

multiyear Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the District of Columbia FLAP are listed below in no particular order 

and include:

District of Columbia Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2018

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The District of Columbia PDC does not have a firm date 

for the next Call for Projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. 

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
                                      CODE)

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Corrpro Companies, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      (a)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2004 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

Dated: June 29, 2004                               /s/ Robert M. Mayer
                                                   _____________________________
                                                   Robert M. Mayer
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

      The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Colony Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Darren J. Tangen, Chief
Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Darren J. Tangen                                                           
|                     |  |  |  | Darren J. Tangen Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350 and shall not be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.