alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 217

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

CATARINO BRISENO JR

, A ppellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the 1 56 th District Court

of Bee County, Texas.



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes

Counsel for a ppellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal

. Appellant signed both

the motion and an affidavit

. We find the motion and affidavit together meet the

requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and attorney

must sign a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a). Without2 passing on the merits of the case, we GRANT the motion to dismiss and DISM I SS the

appeal.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant ’s request, no motion for rehearing will

be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

GREGORY T. PERKES

Justice

Do not publish.

T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

17th day of September, 2020.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28533]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Treasury Current Value of Funds Rate

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of rate for use in Federal debt collection and discount 
evaluation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 11 of the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (31 
U.S.C. 3717), the Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for 
computing and publishing the percentage rate to be used in assessing 
interest charges for outstanding debts on claims owed the Government. 
Treasury's Cash Management Regulations (I TFM 6-8000) also prescribe 
use of this rate by agencies as a comparison point in evaluating the 
cost-effectiveness of a cash discount. Notice is hereby given that the 
applicable rate is 5 percent for calendar year 1998.

DATES: The rate will be in effect for the period beginning on January 
1, 1998 and ending on December 31, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquiries should be directed to the 
Program Compliance & Evaluation Division, Financial Management Service, 
Department of the Treasury, 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20227 
(Telephone: (202) 874-6630).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The rate reflects the current value of funds 
to the Treasury for use in connection with Federal Cash Management 
Systems and is based on investment rates set for purposes of Pub. L. 
95-147, 91 Stat. 1227. Computed each year by averaging investment rates 
for the 12-month period ending every September 30 for applicability 
effective January 1, the rate is subject to quarterly revisions if the 
annual average, on the moving basis, changes by 2 per centum. The rate 
in effect for calendar year 1998 reflects the average investment rates 
for the 12-month period ended September 30, 1997.


    Dated: October 23, 1997.
Larry D. Stout,
Assistant Commissioner Federal Finance.
[FR Doc. 97-28533 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
# L_2006250DE.01003501.xml

| 14.9.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 250/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 250/35

---

Berichtigung der Änderung der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichts erster Instanz vom 12. Oktober 2005

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 298 vom 15. November 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 298 vom 15. November 2005

Nummer 12 c), betreffend Artikel 76a § 4 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„... unterbreiteten Angriffs- und Verteidigungsmittel sowie der Argumente ...“

muss es heißen:

„... unterbreiteten Angriffs- und Verteidigungsmittel und Argumente ...“.

Nummer 17 betreffend Artikel 138 § 1 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„Die Rechtsmittelschrift enthält ...“

muss es heißen:

„Die Rechtsmittelschrift muss enthalten ...“.

Nummer 17 betreffend Artikel 141 § 2 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„Die Rechtsmittelbeantwortung enthält ...“

muss es heißen:

„Die Rechtsmittelbeantwortung muss enthalten ...“.

Nummer 17 betreffend Artikel 141 § 2 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a:

anstatt:

„die Namen und den Wohnsitz der Partei, die sie einreicht ...“

muss es heißen:

„Namen und Wohnsitz der Partei, die sie einreicht ...“.

---
#### ACCO, INC., Appellant, v. BISCAYNE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a United States Corporation, Appellee.

Nos. 76-2028, 76-2029.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 15, 1977.

James W. Geiger, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Michael C. Slotnick of Pallot, Poppell, Goodman & Slotnick, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Acco, Inc., a heating-air conditioning contractor, appeals summary final judgment entered in favor of appellee, Biscayne Federal Savings and Loan Association, as mortgagee, in an action to “compel the exercise of an equity of redemption on property.”

Appellee instituted a suit to foreclose certain mortgages it held on property located in Broward County, Florida, against which appellant simultaneously had pending an action to foreclose its mechanic’s lien rights. Acco was not, however, joined in appellee’s foreclosure suit. Upon conclusion of the mortgage foreclosure suit in favor of appel-lee, suit was brought against appellant to compel it to exercise its rights of redemption. Appellee filed its motion for summary judgment supported by affidavits. Thereupon, the trial court entered summary final judgment and granted Acco twenty (20) days within which to exercise rights of redemption. Upon Acco’s failure to pay, the court entered its order barring redemption rights. Acco instituted this appeal seeking review of both the summary final judgment and the order barring redemption rights.

*885The relation-back of mechanic’s lien to the date of filing the notice of commencement, even though such claim of lien was filed more than one year after the posting of notice of commencement, was recently determined by this court in *Southern Colonial Mortgage Company, Inc. v. Medeiros,*347 So.2d 736 (Fla.4th DCA 1977). In that case we held that the mortgagees could not invoke the provisions of Section 713.13(5),1 Florida Statutes (1969), to gain priority over mechanic’s liens which related back to the notice of commencement. The *Southern Colonial Mortgage*case is dispositive of the issues presented by the instant appeal.

Accordingly, the summary final judgment entered in favor of appellee is reversed, the order barring redemption rights is vacated and set aside, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

ALDERMAN, C. J., CROSS, J., and MILLER, ROBERT, Associate Judge, concur.

1

. § 713.13(5), F.S.A. Unless otherwise provided in the notice of commencement or a new or amended notice of commencement, any notice of commencement heretofore or hereafter recorded shall not be effective as to any person acquiring title or any interest in real property from the owner or under him after one year from the date of recording the notice of commencement.
* This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not

materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);

10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral

argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and

10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

December 9, 2008

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

NOE ANDRADE-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-4136

(D.C. No. 2:06-cr-00852-TS-1)

(D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before HARTZ, TYMKOVICH and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the

appeal waiver contained in defendant Noe Andrade-Lopez’s plea agreement. The

motion was filed pursuant to United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir.

2004) (en banc) (per curiam). Defendant, through counsel, filed a response to the

motion to enforce conceding that there are no meritorious grounds upon which he
-2-

can urge denial of the government’s motion to enforce the appeal waiver. Based

on our review of the record, we are satisfied that the appeal is within the scope of 

the appeal waiver, that the waiver was knowing and voluntary, and that enforcing

the waiver would not result in any miscarriage of justice.

Accordingly, the government’s motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

PER CURIAM
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.2    
  


 
 

CERTIFICATION OF DANIEL VASELLA, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF NOVARTIS AG AND RAYMUND BREU, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF NOVARTIS AG, PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    
  


        In connection with the Annual Report of Novartis AG (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge: 



	1.
	The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



	2.
	The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 







	 	 	/s/  DANIEL VASELLA      

	 	 	Name:	 	Daniel Vasella
	 	 	Title:	 	Chairman and CEO
	

 	
 	

/s/  RAYMUND BREU      

	 	 	Name:	 	Raymund Breu
	 	 	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer





Date: February 24, 2003 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.2


CERTIFICATION OF DANIEL VASELLA, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF NOVARTIS AG AND RAYMUND BREU, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF NOVARTIS AG, PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                        --------------------------------

I, Harrell Beck, Chief Financial Officer of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.  (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended
     December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 20, 2003

/s/ Harrell Beck

Harrell Beck
Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Docket No. FAA·2 01 C\- i2 'DO

Record of Ex Parte Contacts

;10/0· ""<'V)76· AP

Directorate Identifier: -AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been dis~ussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder,

manu.facturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALP A, GAMA, ete)? (You might need to submit a separate

record (0 the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines "Ex PaTte Contacts. '') '.'

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE

ATA Joe V/hite 1211/2010 No response.

Boeing Paul Richter ] 1/19/2010 Concur,

Other! Additional Information:
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                       CCC INFORMATION SERVICES GROUP INC.
                                STOCK OPTION PLAN

     WHEREAS,  the  Board of Directors (the "Board") of CCC Information Services
Group Inc. (the "Company") previously adopted the CCC Information Services Group
Inc.  Stock  Option  Plan  (the  "Plan");  and

     WHEREAS,  the  Board  desires  to  further  amend  the  Plan  to modify the
provisions  thereof  describing  permitted  transfers of option awards under the
Plan;  and

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  the  Plan  is  hereby amended as follows, effective as of
February  1,  2003;

     1.  Section  11  of  the  Plan  is  hereby  amended  by the addition of the
following  sentence  thereto:

          "Notwithstanding the foregoing, under such rules and procedures as the
          Committee  may  establish, a Grantee may transfer an Option, by a gift
          or  a  domestic  relations order only, to any of such Grantee's family
          members,  provided  that  (i) the Award Agreement with respect to such
          Options  expressly  so  permits  or  is amended to so permit, (ii) the
          Grantee  does  not  receive  any  consideration for such transfer, and
          (iii)  the  Grantee  provides  such   documentation   or   information
          concerning  any  such  transfer  or  transferee  as  the Committee may
          reasonably  request.  For  purposes  of  this  Section 11, a Grantee's
          "family  members"  include  any  child, stepchild, grandchild, parent,
          stepparent,  grandparent,  spouse,   former  spouse,  sibling,  niece,
          nephew,  mother-in-law,  father-in-law,  son-in-law,  daughter-in-law,
          brother-in-law,  or  sister-in-law,  including adoptive relationships,
          any  person  sharing  the  Grantee's household (other than a tenant or
          employee), a trust in which these persons have more than fifty percent
          of  the  beneficial  interest, a foundation in which these persons (or
          the Grantee) control the management of assets, and any other entity in
          which  these  persons  (or the Grantee) own more than fifty percent of
          the  voting  interests."
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28739]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4235-N-27]

Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless .

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 31, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Johnston, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7256, 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 
20410; telephone (202) 708-1226; TDD number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: October 24, 1997.
Fred Karnas, Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Development.
[FR Doc. 97-28739 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
```
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-8606 |
|------------------------------------|----------|

 

DWS Allocation Series

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

Two International Place

Boston, MA  02110

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 8/31 |
|--------------------------|------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 8/31/07 |
|---------------------------|---------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

 

AUGUST 31, 2007

Annual Report
Fort Eustis Bridge Replacement

FHWA Project VA FLAP NPNWS 105(1) 

VDOT UPC 105624

Newport News, VA
Agenda

Project Description

Traffic Control Phases

Traffic Models

Q&A Session
Project Description

• Replacement of the Ft. Eustis Blvd 

Bridge over the Lee Hall Reservoir

• Owner Partner: City of Newport News

• Federal Land Partner: Department of 

the Army

• Prevailing Design Standards: VDOT
Project Description

• Existing Bridge was constructed in 

1960 and widened in 1985

• Bridge is “Structurally Deficient” 

per recent inspections

• Two lanes in each direction, with 

auxiliary lane in the EB direction

• West Abutment is built overtop a 

dam

• Ft. Eustis Blvd connects I-64 and US-60 and provides access to the Main 

Entry Control Point at Joint Base Langley Eustis
Project Schedule

• Advertise Contract – Bids Opened March 24

• Conduct Public Information Meetings – March/April 2020

• Project Award – April 2020

• Notice to Proceed/Begin Construction – May 2020 (could be impacted)

• Demolish and Rebuild Westbound Lanes – May 2020-Summer 2021

• Demolish and rebuild Eastbound Lanes – Summer 2021 – Fall 2022

• Project Completion – November 2022
Proposed Bridge Layout

Constructed in Phases 1 & 2

Constructed in Phases 3 & 4
Traffic Control – Phases 1/2

May 2020 – Summer 2021
Traffic Control – Phases 3/4

Summer 2021 – Fall 2022
Construction Complete

Fall/Winter 2022

Westbound Lanes Eastbound Lanes
Traffic Control Plan Phases 1&2
Phases 1&2 – West Project Limits
Detour Plans – Phases 1 and 2
Phases 1&2 – East Project Limits
Traffic Control Plan Phases 3&4
Phases 3/4 – West Project Limits
Detour Plans – Phase 4
Phases 3/4 – East Project Limits
Traffic Management

Existing 

Conditions

Modeling 

Scenarios

Analysis Results
Existing Conditions

From EB/WB US-60 

(Warwick Blvd)

To I-64 Exit 250

Project Limits

VA-105 – Ft. Eustis Blvd 

To WB 

Warwick 

Blvd
Proposed Conditions – During 

Construction

EB – Right Lane Closure 

After Bridge

Westbound - Right Lane 

Closure Before Bridge

EB – Lane Closure At 

Warwick Blvd
Alternate 

Routes to Ft. 

Eustis: 

AM Peak Hours
Alternate Route Assumptions

 Denbigh Blvd Bridge Under Construction until August 2021

 Atkinson Blvd Bridge Under Construction until December 2020

Both projects will be completed prior to the end of Ft. Eustis Blvd 

bridge, which may provide additional relief.
Alternate 

Routes from

Ft. Eustis: 

PM Peak Hours
Recommendations

 Goal: Alternate Routes + Demand Reduction

 Alternate Routes  25% reduction

 Avoiding Rush Hour  10% reduction 

 Total Reduction of 35%

 PM Scenario – Reduces Average Delay from 15 minutes to 5 minutes
Rush Hour Reduction

How do we accomplish that?

 Flexible work schedules to avoid 

entrance and exit during peak hours

 Peak morning: 7:00 – 9:00 am

 Peak evening: 4:00 – 6:00 pm

 Teleworking

 Ridesharing 

Thank you for Listening

How can you help?

 Avoid Route 105 during peak hours:

 7:00 – 9:00 am

 4:00 – 6:00 pm

 Slow Down to 35 mph in the work zone

 Seek Alternate Routes
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jimmy D. MURRAY.

No. 61683.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 27, 1978.

In re: Jimmy D. Murray applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied. There is no merit in the application.
#### William S. BLALOCK, Appellant, v. Roy ROGERS, Appellee.

No. 72-836.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 29, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Amendment to Omnibus Agreement



 
EXHIBIT 10.7

 
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE OMNIBUS AGREEMENT

 
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE OMNIBUS
AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 30, 2001 (the “Omnibus Agreement) among Penn Virginia Corporation, Penn Virginia Resource GP, LLC, Penn Virginia Operating Co., LLC and Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P., dated as of December 19, 2002 (this
“Amendment”), is entered into and effectuated by Penn Virginia Corporation, a Virginia corporation (“Penn Virginia Corporation”), Penn Virginia Resource GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (including any permitted
successors and assigns under the MLP Agreement (as defined in the Omnibus Agreement), the “General Partner”), for itself and on behalf of the MLP in its capacity as general partner, Penn Virginia Operating Co., LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (the “OLLC”), and Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. a Delaware limited partnership (the “MLP”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used as defined in the Omnibus Agreement. 
 
WHEREAS, Peabody Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(“Peabody”), Eastern Associated Coal Corp., a West Virginia corporation and indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Peabody, Peabody Natural Resources Company, a Delaware general partnership and indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Peabody, and
the MLP have entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement of even date herewith and certain related agreements whereby Peabody will obtain one newly created seat on the board of directors of the General Partner; and 
 
WHEREAS, the parties to the Omnibus Agreement deem it in their
best interest to effect this Amendment in order to clarify that Peabody shall not be deemed to be a Penn Virginia Entity for purposes of the Omnibus Agreement; and 
 
WHEREAS, the Conflicts Committee has approved this Amendment. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, the Omnibus Agreement is hereby amended as
follows: 
 
1. The definition of “Penn
Virginia Entities” in Section 1.1(b) is hereby amended by deleting the “.” at the end of the defined term and adding the following language: 
 

	 	    	 	“and, for purposes of this Agreement, Peabody Energy Corporation and its Subsidiaries.” 

 









 
IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first written above. 
 

	 PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION

	
	 By:
	 	  


	 	 	 Name:
 Title:



 

	 PENN VIRGINIA RESOURCE GP, LLC

	
	 By:
	 	  


	 	 	 Name:
 Title:



 

	 PENN VIRGINIA OPERATING CO., LLC

	
	 By:
	 	 Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P., its sole member

	 	 	  
 By: Penn
Virginia Resource GP, LLC, its
 general partner

	 	 	  
     By:

             Name:
             Title:



 

	 PENN VIRGINIA RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P.

	
	 By:
	 	 Penn Virginia Resource GP, LLC, its general partner

	 	 	  
     By:

             Name:
             Title:



 

2