alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      31.1**





**Coastal
      Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd.**





**Rule
      13a-14 Certification**





I,
      Phillip W. Ware, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on FORM 10-Q of Coastal Caribbean Oils &
Minerals, Ltd.





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;





4.  I
      am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
      I
      have:





a)  designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
      relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in
      which this report is being prepared;





b)  evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
      of
      the end of the period covered by this report (the "Evaluation Date");
      and





c)  presented
      in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
      and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5.  I
      have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
      and
      the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent functions):





a)  all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)  any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6.  I
      have
      indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in
      internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
      controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any
      corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
      weaknesses.


Date:
                November 9, 2006
            By
            /s/
              Phillip W. WarePhillip
              W. WareChief
                Executive Officer,
              President
                and Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
April 2, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Varian,
Inc.



Dated: May 17, 2004



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ G. EDWARD MCCLAMMY                                                         
|                                                                               
|G. Edward McClammy Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### John Edward BILLEDEAUX v. O. J. ADAMS.

No. 62067.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: O: J. Adams and Charter Oaks Fire Insurance Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Calcasieu. 355 So.2d 1345.

Writ denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10(DD)

January 7, 2003



Mr. David L. Burner
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Goodrich Corporation
2730 West Tyvola Road
Charlotte, NC  28217

Dear Dave:

This is to confirm your compensation and benefits arrangements and opportunities
through your retirement on April 30, 2004 as approved by the Compensation
Committee at its December 2, 2002 meeting, and confirmed by the Board of
Directors on December 3rd.

Through April 30, 2004, your base salary will remain $1,000,000 on an annual
basis and your Management Incentive Plan ("MIP") opportunity will continue at a
target level of 100%. You will have a full year MIP opportunity  in 2003 and a
pro-rata (4/12) opportunity in 2004 based on your April 30, 2004 retirement
date.

The Board awarded you a stock option grant for 2003 of 181,000 shares,
exercisable on the same terms as other senior executive officers. The Board also
granted you a Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") award of 53,000 performance
shares as a target opportunity for the 2003-2005 period. Any actual  pay-out of
shares under the 2002 - 2004 and 2003 - 2005 LTIP awards will be  calculated  on
a pro-rata basis using your April 30, 2004 retirement date in accordance  with
the Plan.  Neither a stock-option  award nor an LTIP award will be granted to
you for calendar year 2004.

You will continue to participate through April 30, 2004 in all Company pension,
savings and health and welfare plans or arrangements for which you are currently
eligible. Also, through April 30, 2004, you will continue to receive perquisites
and other benefits of the type currently available to other senior executive
officers.
<PAGE>


Mr. David L. Burner
January 7, 2003
Page 2



Office space and administrative support outside the Company's headquarters will
be provided beginning October, 2003 and extending through April 30, 2007.

Sincerely,



James R. Wilson
Chairman - Compensation Committee
Goodrich Corporation Board of Directors


cc:     James J. Glasser (Chairman -- Governance Committee)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 30, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 30, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0115. WILLIAM J. ROSS et al. v. TRAVIS HAMPTON .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2011CV2495
#### In re ESTATE of Thomas J. McGINTY, Deceased.

No. 70-957.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 22, 1971.

*192Sylvan B. Burdick, of Burdick & Silvi-an, West Palm Beach, for appellant-Patricia McGinty.

C. H. Albury, of Heuer & Albury, West Palm Beach, for appellee-William McGinty.

Harry Johnston, II, West Palm Beach, Attorney Ad Litem for John Duddy and Celeste Duddy.

Sidney M. Dubbin, West Palm Beach, for appellee-Brian McGinty.

Paty, Downey, Lewis & Daves, Palm Beach, for appellees-Executors Daniel Dow-ney and Bank of Palm Beach and Trust Co.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

OWEN, Judge.

The County Judge’s Court of Palm Beach County in probate, entered its order dated October 14, 1970, determining that certain real property of the decedent was homestead property not subject to disposition by decedent’s will. A devisee of such property timely filed notice of appeal, but designated the appeal as interlocutory and presumably is perfecting the same under Rule 4.2, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A. The matter is presently before us on appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Our jurisdiction to review orders or decrees of the county judge’s court pertaining to probate matters is limited to review of final orders or decrees. Article V, Section 5(3), Constitution of Florida, 1968, F.S.A.; In re Estate of Leterman, Fla. App.1970, 238 So.2d 695; In re Maxcy’s Estate, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 446; Biederman v. Cheatham, Fla.App.1964, 161 So. 2d 538. However, appellees concede, and in fact insist, that the order of October 14, 1970, which appellant seeks to have us review, is a final order, reviewable by full appeal under Rule 3.2, F.A.R. The timely filing of the notice of appeal conferred appellate jurisdiction upon this court even though the notice was improperly designated. Shute v. Keystone State Bank, Fla. App.1963, 159 So.2d 106. Thus, we clearly have jurisdiction, and the real issue is whether we should, in the exercise of our discretion, entertain the appeal when appellant has proceeded under Rule 4.2, F.A.R. rather than Rule 3.2, F.A.R.

While we do not condone a violation of the appellate rules we are reluctant to dismiss the present appeal where it appears that to do so would deprive appellant of any opportunity of appellate review of the order, and where our entertaining the appeal places no greater burden on appel-lees than would have been the case had the notice of appeal been properly designated and the appeal pursued under Rule 3.2, F. A.R. We will therefore exercise our discretion to treat this as a full appeal with appellees allowed ten days within which to file such cross assignments of error, additional directions to the clerk and designations to the reporter, as they deem necessary, and thereafter the progress of the appeal shall be in accordance with the time schedule provided under Rule 3.6, F.A.R.

The motion to dismiss is denied.

CROSS, C. J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge, concur.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3674 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act and the Child 

Nutrition Act of 1966 to prohibit the use of cell-cultivated meat under 

the school lunch program and the school breakfast program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2024 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act and the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to prohibit 

the use of cell-cultivated meat under the school lunch 

program and the school breakfast program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School Lunch Integrity 

5 Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3674 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CELL-CULTIVATED MEAT. 

2 (a) SCHOOL LUNCH.—Section 9(a) of the Richard B. 

3 Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(a)) 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) by conforming the margin of paragraph (3) 

6 to the margin of paragraph (2); and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(6) PROHIBITION ON CELL-CULTIVATED

9 MEAT.—Lunches served by schools participating in 

10 the school lunch program under this Act may not in11 clude cell-cultivated meat.’’. 

12 (b) SCHOOL BREAKFAST.—Section 4(e)(1) of the 

13 Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1773(e)(1)) is 

14 amended by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(C) PROHIBITION ON CELL-CULTIVATED

16 MEAT.—Breakfasts served by schools partici17 pating in the school breakfast program under 

18 this section may not include cell-cultivated 

19 meat.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
*The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2795

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

Lyle Veach, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: March 13, 2001

Filed: March 22, 2001 

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and MONTGOMERY,*

District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

This case arises from a reverse sting operation. Lyle Veach agreed to purchase

one pound of methamphetamine from a supplier so he could resell it. Unbeknownst to

Veach, the supplier was a Government agent and the substance Veach bought was

counterfeit rather than the real thing. Under a written plea agreement, Veach pleaded

guilty to conspiracy to distribute over 500 grams of a substance containing
**The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

-2-

methamphetamine. In deciding Veach's base offense level at sentencing, the district

court** included the pound of counterfeit methamphetamine. The district court

sentenced Veach to 135 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release.

On appeal, Veach asserts that although he believed he was buying a pound of real

methamphetamine, the fake pound should not have been included in deciding his base

offense level. The district court correctly included the weight of the bogus drug based

on Veach's agreement to buy that amount of methamphetamine. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1

n.12. We thus affirm Veach's sentence.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

139153 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139153 

 COA: 277505 

Kent CC: 01-002471-FC 

PATRICK LEWIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 7, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.A


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002, of El Paso CGP Company (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
A. Wise, Chief Executive Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/ William A. Wise
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             William A. Wise
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                             August 14, 2002
Exhibit
31.01





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14





I, David N. Pierce, certify
that:





1.           I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, of FX Energy,
Inc.; and





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.





3.           [omitted]





4.           [omitted]





5.           [omitted]








Dated:
March 18, 2010








/s/ David
N. Pierce


David N.
Pierce


Chief
Executive Officer
# October 2008 - January 2011
**EXHIBIT
      32.2 – CFO Certification**








**ROYAL
      INVEST INTERNATIONAL CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Invest
      International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nathan Lapkin, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by
      ss.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.





By:
      /s/ Nathan Lapkin


Nathan
      Lapkin


Chief
      Financial Officer





November
      19, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
      Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
House Calendar No. 1

105TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 105–1

IN THE MATTER OF REPRESENTATIVE NEWT GINGRICH--

pages 501 to 600
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
EXHIBIT 23.1



|     |  |                                                                                                    |  | 
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|LOGO |  | 233 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 2500 Chicago, Illinois 60601 Telephone: 312-856-9100 Fax: 312-856-1379

Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

Addus Homecare Corporation

Palatine, Illinois

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-164413 on Form S-8, of our report dated March 26, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Addus HomeCare Corporation, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Chicago, IL

March 26, 2010
255 La. 1105

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Willis YOUNG v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50538.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 4, 1970.

In re: Willis Young applying for writ of habeas corpus. Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory or original jurisdiction.

BARHAM,

Justice is of the opinion we should grant an evidentiary hearing or order the transcript of the record in the habeas corpus proceeding below be forwarded for review. See dissent in State ex rel, Ardoin v. Henderson, 255 La. 1029, 233 So.2d 923.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 21, 2021

s0414 

# Order

Clerk April 21, 2021

161796

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161796

COA: 346529

Mason CC: 15

- 002928

- FC

BENJAMIN MICHAEL BENTZ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of October 27, 2020, the Attorney General was directed to answer the

application for leave to appeal the May 7, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is

again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the defendant’s

argument that the testimony of Dr. N. Debra Simms that the complainant suffered

“probable pediatric sexual abuse” requires reversal of the defendant’s convic tions under

the plain

- error analysis of People v Carines, 460 Mich 750, 763

- 764 (1999), and this

Court’s decision in People v Harbison, 504 Mich 230 (2019). While the Court of

Appeals was correct that this issue was not before it, given that our remand to the trial

court was limited to the defendant’s ineffective assistance claims, we believe it prudent

for the Court of Appeals to consider this i ssue in the first instance.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 No. 333**-**34362; on Form S-8No. 333-04373, No. 333-17493, No. 333-71354, and No. 333-114359; and on Form SB-2 No. 333-71076 of Optical Sensors Incorporated d/b/a väsamed of our report dated February 25, 2005, which appears on page 26 of this annual report on Form 10-KSBfor the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE &COMPANY, LLP 

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

March 29, 2005
|PwC_fl_30mmh_c | Exhibit 23.1
|-------------- | ------------









Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on
Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd. of our report dated March 25, 2013, relating to
the consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, and for each of the years in the two year
period ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Advantage Oil &
Gas Ltd. as at December 31, 2012.















PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Calgary, Alberta

March 26, 2013



















PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, Chartered Accountants

111
5 Avenue SW, Suite 3100, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 5L3

T:
+1 403 509 7500, F: +1 403 781 1825, www.pwc.com/ca



“PwC”
refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership.