alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James R. DAVIS, Petitioner, v. CONGER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 39961.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 3, 1971.

Herbert A. Langston, Jr., Orlando, for petitioner.

B. C. Pyle, of Whittaker, Pyle & Wood, Orlando, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on petition for writ of certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission in said cause, bearing date July 2, 1970, and the petitioner having failed to show that the essential requirements of law have been violated, it is

Ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied. See Howell v. Cottage-Ette Mfg. Co., 186 So.2d 1 (Fla.1966); Florida Cartage Company v. Tyler, 90 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1956).

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

DREW, J. (Retired), concurs specially with opinion.

DREW, Justice, Retired

(concurring specially) :

I concur in the denial of certiorari in this case. In doing so I am persuaded by the observation of the Judge of Industrial Claims (approved by the full Commission in its affirmance without opinion) that “I have also considered the employer-carrier’s Exhibits 1 and 2 taking note that the employer and carrier have not denied emergency treatment to the claimant while out of state or out of the city”. I construe this as holding that the claimant is entitled to emergency *palliative treatment*wherever he may be if such is needed and is causally related to the industrial accident. With such holding I am in agreement.

As to the bill of Doctor Boardman, I feel bound by the findings of the Judge of Industrial Claims that such treatment was not causally related to the accident.

ERVIN, J., concurs.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

Motion of 

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1995-569 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) 

MOTION OF AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

DANIEL P. GARTON 

President 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc. 

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5494 

DFW Airport, Texas 75261 

KATHLEEN SOLED 

Vice President & General Counsel 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc. 

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5494 

DFW Airport, Texas 75261 

(817) 967-1574 

kate.soled@aa.com 

May 10, 2013 

FRANCIS C. HEIL 

Senior Attorney 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 496-5642 

francis.heil@aa.com 
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

Motion of 

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) 

DOT-OST-1995-569 

MOTION OF AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, 

hereby moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 1Q2013, be 

accorded confidential treatment and withheld from public 

disclosure. The information for which confidential treatment 

is requested pertains to American Eagle's airframes and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. 

In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 

41582, we are uploading our confidential report electronically 

to the following website: http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov 

On June 5, 1995, James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of 

Airline Statistics, the Department granted confidential treatment for a 10-year period to similar data filed by American 
-2-

Airlines. For the reasons stated in Mr. Mitchell's letter, the 

Department should grant the same relief here. 

WHEREFORE, American Eagle moves that the schedule 

referenced above be withheld from public disclosure under Rule 

12 for a period of 10 years. 

May 10, 2013 

Respectfully submitted, 

FRANCIS C. HEIL 

Senior Attorney 

American Airlines, Inc. 

On behalf of American Eagle 

Airlines, Inc.
Exhibit (j)

           CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
                                ACCOUNTING FIRM

We  consent  to  the  references  to  our  firm  under  the  caption  "Financial
Highlights"  for the Treasury  Portfolio of Investors  Cash Trust in the Premier
Money Market Shares Prospectus, DWS U.S. Treasury Money Fund Class S Prospectus,
Investment  Class   Prospectus,   and   Institutional   Shares   Prospectus  and
"Independent  Registered Public  Accounting Firm" and "Financial  Statements" in
the  Investors  Cash  Trust  Statements  of  Additional  Information  and to the
incorporation  by  reference  in  Post-Effective  Amendment  Number  30  to  the
Registration  Statement  (Form N-1A,  No.  33-34645) of our report dated May 27,
2008,  on the  financial  statements  and  financial  highlights of the Treasury
Portfolio included in and the Premier Money Market Shares Annual Report, the DWS
U.S.  Treasury  Money Fund Class S Annual Report,  the  Investment  Class Annual
Report and the Institutional Shares Annual Report, each dated March 31, 2008.


                                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 157 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 157

      To extend the supplemental security income program to Guam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2021

 Mr. San Nicolas (for himself, Mr. Cardenas, Miss Gonzalez-Colon, Ms. 
Plaskett, Mr. Sablan, Mr. Gallego, Mr. Trone, Mr. McGovern, Mrs. Murphy 
  of Florida, Mr. Khanna, and Ms. Barragan) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the supplemental security income program to Guam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guam Supplemental Security Income 
Equality Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME PROGRAM TO GUAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 303(b) of the Social Security Amendments 
of 1972 (86 Stat. 1484) is amended by striking ``, Guam,''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Definition of state.--Section 1101(a)(1) of the Social 
        Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1301(a)(1)) is amended in the 5th 
        sentence by striking ``, the Virgin Islands, and Guam'' each 
        place it appears and inserting ``and the Virgin Islands''.
            (2) Guam included in geographic meaning of united states.--
        Section 1614(e) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(e)) is amended by 
        striking ``and the District of Columbia'' and inserting ``, the 
        District of Columbia, and Guam''.
    (c) Waiver Authority.--The Commissioner of Social Security may 
waive or modify any statutory requirement relating to the provision of 
benefits under the Supplemental Security Income Program under title XVI 
of the Social Security Act in Guam, to the extent that the Commissioner 
deems it necessary in order to adapt the program to the needs of Guam.
    (d) Effective Date.--This section and the amendments made by this 
section shall take effect on the 1st day of the 1st Federal fiscal year 
that begins 1 year or more after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00069-CR

Donte Wordlaw

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1365043D)

October 29, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
#### L. D. ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos, S-303 to S-305.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 12, 1973.

James Ron Shelley, Public Defender, and Peter W. Mitchell, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Judgments of conviction in the above cases are affirmed, it appearing that appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
# L_2005221EN.01001301.xml

| 26.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 221/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 221/13

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1388/2005

of 25 August 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 23 August 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 23 August 2005.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 23 August 2005, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 14,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 August 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 August 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1239/2005 (OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p. 32).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004.

3

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________
No. 96-10177

_______________________

WADE H. ENGLISH and DOUGLAS A. WIREMAN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

ASHLAND CHEMICAL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:92-CV-2421-BC)

_________________________________________________________________ December 27, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this hard-fought and well-tried Title VII case, there

was a material fact question whether the plaintiffs were discharged

because of their race. The jury answered that question in the

affirmative, apparently resolving ambiguities and credibility

choices against Ashland. We cannot say that no reasonable jury

could have so found. Ashland’s complaint about the district2

court’s conditional grant of a new trial is therefore moot.

Further, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s

handling of evidentiary issues.

Based on our review of the briefs, the excell ent

arguments of counsel, and pertinent portions of the rec ord, the

judgment is AFFIRMED

.
#### James JONES, Successful Candidate, et al., Appellants, v. Richard BECKER, Appellee.

No. 71-1068.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 25, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Joseph P. Metzger, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Variable Series II, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| August 20, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark    |
|-----------------|------------------------|
|            | Michael G. Clark       |
|            | President              |
|            | DWS Variable Series II |

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AZ-950-5700-77; AZA 30389]


Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and Opportunity for Public Meeting; 
Arizona

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 
has filed an application to withdraw 15 acres of National Forest System 
land to protect the Cagle Cabin Administrative Site. This notice closes 
the land for up to 2 years from location and entry under the United 
States mining laws. The land will remain open to all other uses which 
may be made of National Forest System land.

DATES: Comments and requests for a meeting should be received on or 
before January 7, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments and meeting requests should be sent to the Forest 
Supervisor, Tonto National Forest, 2324 E. McDowell Road, Phoenix, 
Arizona 85006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Young, Tonto National Forest, 602-
225-5200, or Howard Okamoto, Pleasant Valley Ranger District, 520-462-
4300.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 22, 1997, the Forest Service 
filed an application to withdraw the following described National 
Forest System land from location and entry under the United States 
mining laws, subject to valid existing rights:

Gila and Salt River Meridian

Tonto National Forest

T. 7 N., R. 14 E.,
    Sec. 30, W\1/2\SE\1/4\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\, E\1/2\SW\1/4\NE\1/4\SE\1/
4\, NW\1/4\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\, and NE\1/4\NW\1/4\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\, 
unsurveyed.

    The area described contains 15 acres in Gila County.

    All persons who wish to submit comments, suggestions, or objections 
in connection with the proposed withdrawal must present their views in 
writing, by the date specified above, to the Forest Supervisor, Tonto 
National Forest.
    Notice is hereby given that an opportunity for a public meeting is 
afforded in connection with the proposed withdrawal. All interested 
persons who desire a public meeting for the purpose of being heard on 
the proposed withdrawal must submit a written request, by the date 
specified above, to the Forest Supervisor, Tonto National Forest. Upon 
determination by the authorized officer that a public meeting will be 
held, a notice of time and place will be published in the Federal 
Register at least 30 days prior to the meeting.
    The application will be processed in accordance with the 
regulations set forth in 43 CFR 2300.
    For a period of 2 years from the date of publication of this notice 
in the Federal Register, the land will be segregated as specified above 
unless the application is denied or canceled or the withdrawal is 
approved prior to that date.

    Dated: September 30, 1997.
Michael A. Ferguson,
Deputy State Director,
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-26803 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
Order entered December 29, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01425-CV

ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC., Appellant

V.

COURTNEY COX, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-05455

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s December 22, 2015 motion to extend time and ORDER the brief 

be filed no later than January 27, 2016. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 13.1
  Certificate of CEO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Grupo Casa Saba S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Gabriel Saba D’jamus, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alejandro Sadurni Gomez, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, except with respect to the paragraph below, to the best of his knowledge:
  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Because the independent auditors of the Company were unable to audit the balance of inventories as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 and certain unquantifiable contingencies in connection with our subsidiary CSB Drogarias, S.A. (f/k/a Drogasmil Medicamentos e Perfumaria, S.A.), the independent auditors issued a qualified audit opinion which is included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  By: /s/ Gabriel Saba D’jamus
 Name: Gabriel Saba D’jamus
 Title:   Chief Executive Officer
 Date:   June 30, 2010
 
 By: /s/ Alejandro Sadurni Gomez
 Name: Alejandro Sadurni Gomez
 Title:   Chief Financial Officer
 Date:   June 30, 2010
 
 
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-162188) pertaining to the 2009 Non-Executive Director Stock Plan of Colony Financial, Inc. of our reports dated March 7, 2011, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Colony Financial, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Colony Financial, Inc., the financial statements of ColFin WLH Funding, LLC and the financial statements of ColFin NW Funding, LLC,included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 7, 2011
~ ~ 

# ~ o , 'T1 T ~ ~ ~ 

# 2Ln ~ ~ ~' ~• ~ ~ T ~ 

# , ~ Q



## ~ 

# Ep 

# 6i m

~ 

# m 9D 0 ~ 9 ~ 

# O> ID Q Ci Q N N G~~J1 N i ~ t

~~ N tJ

~~ N N

~~ N t ~3

~ y -~ :~ y ' V~"' -• -•

~~ •.a ~

G ~ W ~ a ,,,

~~ F] ~ .r ~

r 

## ~ g b

~ CD

0 

## w ° Q 

# 1 Q



# m 0 

# tn °

L~ 

# i + r 40 

# m ~ ~ 

## Z C7

~ 

# E

~ p~ e0 

### o ca 1V m

A N~ N m



### o>c ~ W~ N-~ C~

vo i+. 41b, tJ 

### vc.► !~ 7 ~ .1

~ 

### a fJ Q!

c7+ 

### n O N V



### tJ A~ AJ v

CII ~ C

~ p
~ 

### gtbT ~ 

# ~ m v v

~ 

# ~ rn Ai VI b

p ~ N a?

~~ 

## A C1D

. N { ~ ~ 7 

## {+ Go m O ~ O

V D nf Oo 

## Q m N Qo

t~ 

## i W ~ 

## m

rV
- d 

## m O m n ~ m 

## v 

# a m ~ 

# o

~ 

# m v ~

cn 

# o ~ `~~" ~ G



# _ ~~► L~aZ~

v 

# = 4 'n ~ 

# ff 3 a T b ~ ~ ~ ~ ...► m J► ~ i~ C! IV ~ V



# _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

# a m 0

m Cl)



# ~ Oo 

# n

~

~ ~ 

## A

Vt
Item 77C DWS Alternative Asset Allocation Plus Fund
Registrant incorporates by reference to its Proxy Statement filed on January 4,
2008 (SEC Accession No. 0001193125-08-001712).
A Special Meeting of Shareholders of DWS Alternative Asset Allocation Plus
Fund of DWS Equity Trust (the "Fund") was held on March 31, 2008, at the
offices of Deutsche Asset Management, 345 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10154.
The following matters were voted upon by the shareholders of said Fund (the
resulting votes are presented below):
1.	Election of the Board of Trustees of the Fund


Number of Votes:
Trustee
For
Withheld
John W. Ballentine
5,716,267.4134
78,446.9386
Henry P. Becton, Jr.
5,716,267.4134
78,446.9386
Dawn-Marie Driscoll
5,716,267.4134
78,446.9386
Keith R. Fox
5,716,504.4134
78,209.9386
Paul K. Freeman
5,716,504.4134
78,209.9386
Kenneth C. Froewiss
5,716,267.4134
78,446.9386
Richard J. Herring
5,716,267.4134
78,446.9386
William McClayton
5,716,267.4134
78,446.9386
Rebecca W. Rimel
5,715,192.4134
79,521.9386
Axel Schwarzer
5,716,267.4134
78,446.9386
William N. Searcy, Jr.
5,716,267.4134
78,446.9386
Jean Gleason Stromberg
5,716,267.4134
78,446.9386
Robert H. Wadsworth
5,716,267.4134
78,446.9386