alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

In the Matter of the Estate of Travis B. 

Kirchner, Deceased,

 

 Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00106-CV

Appeal from the

Probate Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2010-CPR01539)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter’s third request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter’s Record until February 28, 2019. NO FURTHER REQUESTS 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WIL BECONSIDERED

BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Jason P. Mestas, Court Reporter for the Probate Court No. 1,

for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record for the above styled and numbered 

cause and forward the same to this Court on or before February 28, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.57


                       NINETEENTH AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AND
                           OEM MANUFACTURING AGREEMENT


         The License and OEM Manufacturing Agreement ("LOEMMA") with an
effective date of July 1, 2002, by and among EchoStar Satellite Corporation,
EchoStar Technologies Corporation and Thomson multimedia Inc. is hereby amended
as follows:

         1.   Section 11.16 is amended to read:

         The Parties shall mutually agree to a trademark agreement (the
         "Trademark Agreement") to be attached as Exhibit E hereto on or before
         January 6, 2003.

         2.   Unless specifically defined herein, all defined terms will have
              the meaning ascribed to such terms in the LOEMMA. The LOEMMA shall
              remain in all other respects unchanged.



EchoStar Satellite Corporation              EchoStar Technologies Corporation

By:                                         By:
       ---------------------------                 -----------------------------

Title:                                      Title:
       ---------------------------                 -----------------------------

Date:                                       Date:
       ---------------------------                 -----------------------------


Thomson multimedia Inc.

By:
       ---------------------------

Title:
       ---------------------------

Date:
       ---------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dominos, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 13, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry J. Silverman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on
my knowledge:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Harry J. SilvermanHarry J. SilvermanChief Financial Officer




Dated: July 27, 2004



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Dominos, Inc. and will be retained by Dominos, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10(c)














	EXHIBIT 10(c)



	[Letterhead of Piper
Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe LLP]



	6225 Smith Avenue 
Baltimore, Maryland
21209-3600 
www.piperrudnick.com




	 MAIN 	PHONE

      FAX 	 (410) 580-3000 

      (410) 580-3001



	January 25, 2002



	MERCURY FUNDS,
      INC. 

      800 Scudders Mill
Road 
Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536



	Registration
Statement on Form N-1A



	Ladies and Gentlemen:



	      Please refer to our opinion
      letter to you of June 12, 2000, concerning certain matters of Maryland law
      relating to the incorporation of Mercury Asset Management Funds, Inc. (now
      named, Mercury Funds, Inc.), a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”),
      and the shares of common stock, $.0001 par value, of Class I, Class A, Class
      B, and Class C (the “Shares”) of the Mercury Select Growth Fund, a series
      of the Corporation. We hereby confirm the opinion stated in that letter,
      as of the date thereof, and consent to your filing a copy of the same with
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Fund’s Registration Statement on Form
      N-1A, Registration No. 333-32242, pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933,
      as amended, and Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to its Registration Statement
      pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, Registration
      No. 811-08797 (collectively, the “Amendment”), relating to the Shares.



	 	Very truly yours,




	 	PIPER MARBURY
      RUDNICK & WOLFE LLP
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3698 

AN ACT 

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to 

revise references in such title to individuals with intellectual disabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3698 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Words Matter for the 

3 District of Columbia Courts Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REFERENCES TO INDIVIDUALS WITH INTELLEC5 TUAL DISABILITIES. 

6 (a) JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT

7 COURT.—Section 11–501(2)(D), District of Columbia Of8 ficial Code, is amended by striking ‘‘substantially retarded 

9 persons’’ and inserting ‘‘persons with moderate intellec10 tual disabilities’’. 

11 (b) JURISDICTION OF SUPERIOR COURT.—Section 

12 11–921(a)(4)(D), District of Columbia Official Code, is 

13 amended by striking ‘‘substantially retarded persons’’ and 

14 inserting ‘‘persons with moderate intellectual disabilities’’. 

15 (c) JURISDICTION OF FAMILY COURT.—Section 11– 

16 1101(a)(15), District of Columbia Official Code, is amend17 ed by striking ‘‘the at least moderately mentally retarded’’ 

18 and inserting ‘‘persons with moderate intellectual disabil19 ities’’. 

Passed the Senate September 25, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3698 

AN ACT 

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official 

uals with intellectual disabilities. Code, to revise references in such title to individ-
TOMMY WELLS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1408

Opinion filed August 10, 2017.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Douglas A Dorsey, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed a belated 

appeal from the February 18, 2016, judgments and sentences in Nassau County Circuit 

Court case numbers 2010CF86, 2010CF87, 2010CF89, 2010CF91, 2010CF92, 
2

2015CF541, and 2015CF637. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this 

opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of 

appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, 

the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent petitioner on appeal.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Roy Clark SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2059.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 14, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler and Laurie Sistrunk, Asst. Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

CROSS, J., dissents.
In Reply Refer To: 

HSA-10/B-137A1 

400 Seventh St., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 October 27, 2006 

 Mr. Bill Neusch 

President 

Gibraltar 

320 Southland Road 

 Burnet, TX 78611 

Dear Mr. Neusch: 

Your test level 4 (TL-4) Gibraltar cable barrier was formally accepted for use on the National 

Highway System in my September 9, 2005, acceptance letter, B-137A. The tested design, as 

described in that letter, consisted of cables placed 20 inches, 30 inches, and 39 inches above 

the ground line. In your October 13, 2006, letter to Mr. Richard Powers of my staff, you 

requested the Federal Highway Administration’s acceptance of a modified version of this 

design which added a fourth cable between the bottom two at a height of 25 inches. The 

resultant 4-cable design has the lower three cables at the same heights as your TL-3 design 

while retaining the top cable at the tested TL-4 height of 39 inches. The addition of the fourth 

cable requires a modified “hairpin” and lockplate to retain the cables at the proper heights. 

Since the terminal remains the same, it will also be necessary to “anchor” the added cable. 

You have proposed to do this by tapering the 25-inch high cable down to the bottom (20-inch) 

cable between the first line post and the last terminal post and connecting the two cables with a 

series of four cable clamps (Crosby Type) spaced 4.5 inches apart along the 20-inch high 

bottom cable. 

The modified Gibraltar Cable Barrier as described above remains an National Cooperative 

Highway Research Program Report 350 TL-4 median barrier when the posts are set on 

alternate sides of the cables or a TL-4 roadside barrier when the cables are all on the traffic 

side of the C-posts. Although the additional cable can logically be expected to reduce the 

design deflection of the barrier, it is not currently possible to assign a specific number to this 

reduction without benefit of a crash test. 

 

Sincerely yours, 

 

 /original signed by/ 

 

John R. Baxter, P.E. 

 Director, Office of Safety Design 

 
2

 Office of Safety
#### PLAYFORD v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP.

No. 38322.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 217 So.2d 584.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55599-55604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28353]



[[Page 55599]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 98-05]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104-164 dated 21 July 
1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 98-05, with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, Certification Under Section 620C(d) of the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961, and sensitivity of technology pages.

    Dated: October 20, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000-04-M

[[Page 55600]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27OC97.004



[[Page 55601]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27OC97.005



[[Page 55602]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27OC97.006



[[Page 55603]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27OC97.007



[[Page 55604]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27OC97.008



[FR Doc. 97-28353 Filed 10-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-C
#### Stanley COLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-877.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 7, 1973.

*45Richard S. Power, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, West Palm Beach, for appellant Stanley Cole.

Philip S. Shailer, State’s Atty., Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Fort Lauderdale, Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen. of State of Florida, West Palm Beach, for appellee State of Florida.

ORDER

Although none of the parties mentioned it in their briefs, a jurisdictional question appears in this case. We noted it at oral argument and the parties have furnished supplemental briefs dealing therewith.

An information was filed in the Court of Record for Broward County, Florida, charging the defendant Cole and one Nathaniel Talbot with robbery. A motion for a change of venue was made by the defendant and an order was entered thereon which transferred the cause to the Criminal Court of Record in Polk County, Florida, for trial. The defendant was there convicted by jury verdict. After the verdict was rendered, the trial court on stipulation of the parties signed an order which transferred the cause back to the Court of Record for Broward County, Florida. Thereafter, on 1 September 1972 the trial judge sitting in Broward County, Florida, entered judgment and sentence which has been filed in that court. The present appeal has been taken from, that judgment and sentence.

This procedure produces the anomaly of an adjudication of guilt and sentencing by a different court than that in which the defendant was convicted. It produces the added peculiarity that in the event the appeal from the judgment of the Court of Record of Broward County reveals the need for a new trial, this court would he in the position of having to return the case to the Court of Record for Polk County— a court not within our district.

We conclude that once the cause was transferred to and actually tried in the Criminal Court of Record for Polk County, jurisdiction remained in that court for the purpose of adjudication and sentencing. Compare Resnick v. State, Fla.App. 1973, 274 So.2d 589. For the purpose of convenience we hold that the order transferring the cause back to the Court of Record for Broward County shall be given effect only as an administrative order for the convenience of the trial judge and the adjudication and sentence shall be treated as an adjudication and sentence of the Court of Record of Polk County, Florida. It is therefore,

ORDERED that this appeal be transferred, pursuant to Rule 2.1a(5)(d), F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., to the Second District Court of Appeal for the State of Florida, and that the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Polk County, Florida, for filing therein any of the original record or proceedings, which the former may now have in his possession.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-97893, 333-47596, 333-03465,and 333-61611) of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. of our report dated May 14, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our reportdated May 14, 2004 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

May 14, 2004
## March 9, 2015 Mr. Gregg Fortunato Memphis 

## I Shelby County Health Department

- Air Pollution Control 814 Jefferson Ave. Memphis, TN 38105 RE: Idling of Cargill equipment and monitoring Dear Mr. Fortunato: **i~fAR** 

## 1 ')

' 

## ..



## Per our phone conversations, on Between January 28'h and March 6 1 

## h 2015, the following

emission points/groups were idled and are no longer in production. Emission Unit/Group Description 1001B EL Barqe Pellet Belt Dust Collector EL #1 Gluten Flash Dryer Receiver Dust 1015 Collector EL #2 Gluten Flash Dryer Receiver Dust 1019 Collector EL Gluten Meal Loadout Receiver Dust 1020 Collector EL Gluten Meal Loadout Aspiration Dust 1021 Collector 1024 EL Gluten Bin Dust Collector 5002 MH #1 Starch Flash Dryer Scrubber MH #1 Starch Dryer to Bins Transfer 5005 Dust Collector 5007 MH #1 Starch Bin Vent 5007 MH #2 Starch Bin Vent 5007 MH #3 Starch Bin Vent 5007 MH #4 Starch Bin Vent 5007 MH #5 Starch Bin Vent 5007 MH #6 Starch Bin Vent 5007 MH #7 Starch Bin Vent 5007 MH #8 Starch Bin Vent - 

## 5007 MH #9 Starch Bin Vent 5007 MH #1 0 Starch Bin Vent 5007 MH #11 Starch Bin Vent 2330 Buoy St. 

## P.O. Box 

## 13368 Memphis, TN 38113 901-775-58005007 

# ==±- MH #12 Starch Bin Vent 5007 MH #13 Starch Bin Vent -- 5008 MH #14 Starch Bin Vent 5040 MH #3 Starch Flash Dryer Scrubber

' MH #3 Starch Dryer to Bins Transfer

I 5055 Dust Collectors SL #1/#2 Side Starch Loadout Receiver 7001 Dust Collector SL #1/#2 Side Starch Loadout Aspiration 7003 Dust Collector

"--· !

SL #3 Side Starch Loadout Aspiration 7010 Dust Collector 6003 RF Precoat Bin Dust Collector 

## r----------- 6008 RF Carbon Furnace Scrubber

- 8001 - CB Stoker Boiler Bag house 

## r--------- - 8203 CB Ash Silo Vent Filter 8301 CB Pulverized Coal Boiler Baghouse 8302 CB Ash Silo Transfer Dust Collector 9003 ' FX Lime Tank Aspiration Dust Collector

I 9005 FX Precoat Bin Dust Collector 9006 FX Check Filter Precoat Dust Collector 10001 GP Fiber Aspiration Dust Collector

----- 10002 GP #2 Pellet Cooler Cyclone

·-· . -

**~-** 10003 GP #3 Pellet Cooler Cyclone

- 10004____ GP 

### t_t:J, Pellet Cooler Cyclone

_ 

## ----j --- 10005

GP #5 Pellet Cooler Cyclone

**~**

··--- 10006

GP Secondary Pellet CoolerCyclone

___ 10014_

GP PeiiE:Jt Belt Dust Collector_ 1

--- - **~-··-------.L_~-·---·** - . Cargill requests that as of March 6th, 2015, the online and manual monitoring tasks for these emission points and groups will no longer be required to be performed. Please contact me at (901 )775-7085 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 1 **~ ~-**  

# ~/?/:~h~Mark G. Blouin EHS Manager 2330 Buoy St. P.O. Box 13368 Memphis, TN 38113 901-775-5800
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

July 16, 2010

Oaktree/Arctic Slope PPIP Fund GP, L.P.

333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071

RE: UST Notification

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Oaktree PPIP

Fund, L.P., dated as of December 18, 2009 (as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented

from time to time, the “Partnership Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the

meanings set forth in the Partnership Agreement.

UST hereby informs the General Partner that notwithstanding the proviso in the definition of

“Final Closing Date” in Article I of the Partnership Agreement, Section 3.3 of the Partnership Agreement

or that certain letter agreement between UST and the General Partner dated March 22, 2010 relating to a

UST Reallocation, UST will not consent to (i) an extension of the Final Closing Date or (ii) any

additional Subsequent Closings, following the date hereof. For the avoidance of doubt, as of the date

hereof, the Capital Commitment of UST is $1,160,784,100.00 and the maximum amount of UST debt that

may be drawn down in accordance with the Loan Agreement is $2,321,568,200.00.

* * * *
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Charles Woodrow CHILDERS, Respondent.

No. 43790.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 22, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 277 So.2d 594.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28190]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY


Determination to Close Meetings of the Director's Advisory 
Committee

    The Director's Advisory Committee (DirAC) will hold meetings in 
Albuquerque, New Mexico on October 27 and 28, 1997, and in Washington, 
DC, on December 11 and 12, 1997.
    The entire agenda of these meetings will be devoted to specific 
national security policy and arms control issues. In accordance with 
section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, 
86 Stat 770 (1972) (codified at 5 U.S.C. App 2 510(a)(1) (1996)), it 
has been determined that discussions during the meetings are likely to 
disclose matters covered under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1). Materials to be 
discussed at the meetings have been properly classified and are 
specifically authorized under criteria established by Executive Order 
12958, 60 FR 19,825 (1995), to be kept secret in the interests of 
national defense and foreign policy.
    Therefore, in accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat 770 (1972) (codified at 5 
U.S.C. App 2 510(a)(1) (1996)), I have determined that, because of the 
need to protect the secrecy of such national security matters, the 
meetings should be closed to the public.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days before the first 
meeting day, in order to enable more Committee members to attend.
John D. Holum,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-28190 Filed 10-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-32-M
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.29    
  


Exhibit C 


 
 

Agreement to Participate—Severance Plan    
  


In
consideration of being made an eligible participant in the Executive Severance Plan and Executive Retention Supplement dated April 10, 2000, I hereby waive any and all rights I may have
under previous severance plan arrangements, provided that any provisions relative to my current stock options shall remain in full force and effect. 



This
waiver includes, without limitation to, my severance agreement dated                        (indicate N/A if a previous agreement
does not exist). 



	Signed	 	 
	 	
	 
	

Date	

 	

 
	 	
	 











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.29


Agreement to Participate—Severance Plan