alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES

                                -----------------

                          DWS LifeCompass Protect Fund

The following information replaces similar disclosure in the "Other Policies and
Information and Secondary Risks -- Additional Information about the Financial
Warranty" section of the prospectuses:

Warranty Provider. The Warranty Provider is Merrill Lynch Bank USA, an
industrial bank licensed pursuant to the laws of the State of Utah with a
principal place of business in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of June 6, 2008, the
long-term unsecured debt obligations of the Warranty Provider had received a
credit rating of "A1" from Moody's, "A+" from Fitch and "A+" from Standard &
Poor's, each a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Standard &
Poor's current rating of "A+" is a downgrade from its initial rating of the
Warranty Provider of "AA-" that Standard & Poor's issued in March 2008.

Under the Warranty Agreement, the fund will pay to the Warranty Provider a fee
at an annual rate equal to 0.57% of the average daily net assets of the fund. In
the event that the fund becomes completely and irreversibly invested in the
Reserve Component, the fee payable to the Warranty Provider will be reduced to
an annual rate of 0.30% of the fund's average daily net assets.

The Warranty Provider has not participated in the organization of the fund. The
Warranty Provider makes no representation regarding the advisability of an
investment in the fund. Additional information about the Warranty Provider can
be found in the Statement of Additional Information.

The fund will provide you with a copy of the most recent financial reports of
the Warranty Provider, free of charge, upon request. To receive a copy of these
reports please contact the fund at the telephone number or write to the fund at
the address shown on the outside back cover of this prospectus.




               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference



                                                                     [Logo]DWS
                                                                       SCUDDER
                                                           Deutsche Bank Group
June 6, 2008
DLCPF-3601
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3490 

To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from providing health care 

to, or engaging in claims processing for health care for, any individual 

unlawfully present in the United States who is not eligible for health 

care under the laws administered by the Secretary. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. TUBERVILLE (for himself, Mr. TILLIS, and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from providing 

health care to, or engaging in claims processing for 

health care for, any individual unlawfully present in the 

United States who is not eligible for health care under 

the laws administered by the Secretary. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No VA Resources for 

5 Illegal Aliens Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3490 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CARE OR PROCESSING OF CLAIMS 

2 FOR CARE FROM DEPARTMENT OF VET3 ERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may not provide 

5 health care to, and may not engage in claims processing 

6 for health care for, any individual unlawfully present in 

7 the United States who is not eligible for health care under 

8 the laws administered by the Secretary. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF STARCRAFT CORPORATION

(All directly owned, except
where indicated):



|1. | Wheel to Wheel, LLC (Indiana)
|-- | -----------------------------



|2. | Tecstar Partners, LLC (Indiana)
|-- | -------------------------------



|3. | Tecstar, L.P. (Indiana)
|-- | -----------------------



| |  | 49% Starcraft Corporation
| | - | -------------------------



| |  | 50% Wheel to Wheel, LLC
| | - | -----------------------



| |  | 1% Tecstar Partners, LLC
| | - | ------------------------



|4. | Starcraft Automotive Group, Inc. (Indiana)
|-- | ------------------------------------------



|5. | Imperial Automotive Group, Inc. (Indiana)
|-- | -----------------------------------------



|6. | Conversion Warranty, Inc. (Indiana)
|-- | -----------------------------------



| |  | 100% Starcraft Automotive Group, Inc.
| | - | -------------------------------------



|7. | National Mobility Corporation (Indiana)
|-- | ---------------------------------------



|8. | Starcraft Southwest, Inc. (Indiana)
|-- | -----------------------------------



|9. | Starcraft FSC, Inc. (off-shore)
|-- | -------------------------------



|10. | Classic Design Concepts, LLC (Indiana)
|--- | --------------------------------------



| |  | 100% Tecstar, L.P.
| | - | ------------------



|11. | Tecstar Manufacturing Canada Limited (Nova Scotia)
|--- | --------------------------------------------------



| |  | 50% Starcraft Corporation
| | - | -------------------------



| |  | 50% Wheel to Wheel, LLC
| | - | -----------------------



|12. | Tarxien Automotive Products Limited (Nova Scotia)
|--- | -------------------------------------------------



| |  | 50% Starcraft Corporation
| | - | -------------------------



| |  | 50% Wheel to Wheel, LLC
| | - | -----------------------



|13. | Starcraft de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
|--- | ---------------------------------------



| |  | 99.97% Starcraft Automotive Group, Inc.
| | - | ---------------------------------------



| |  | 0.03% Starcraft Corporation
| | - | ---------------------------
Case 1:05-cv-00346-MBC   Document 13   Filed 11/08/06   Page 1 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00346-MBC   Document 13   Filed 11/08/06   Page 2 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00346-MBC   Document 13   Filed 11/08/06   Page 3 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00346-MBC   Document 13   Filed 11/08/06   Page 4 of 4
# L_2005154EN.01001901.xml

| 17.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 911/2005

of 16 June 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 14 June 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 14 June 2005.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 14 June 2005, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 18,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004.

3

---
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3711 

To provide tax relief with respect to certain wildfire relief payments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2024 

Mr. PADILLA (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. TESTER, and Ms. LUMMIS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide tax relief with respect to certain wildfire relief 

payments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Innocent Vic5 tims Of Taxation After Fire Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR COMPENSA7 TION FOR LOSSES OR DAMAGES RESULTING 

8 FROM CERTAIN WILDFIRES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986, gross income shall not include any 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3711 IS

1 amount received by an individual as a qualified wildfire 

2 relief payment. 

3 (b) QUALIFIED WILDFIRE RELIEF PAYMENT.—For 

4 purposes of this section— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘qualified wildfire 

6 relief payment’’ means any amount received by or on 

7 behalf of an individual as compensation for losses, 

8 expenses, or damages (including compensation for 

9 additional living expenses, lost wages (other than 

10 compensation for lost wages paid by the employer 

11 which would have otherwise paid such wages), per12 sonal injury, death, or emotional distress) incurred 

13 as a result of a qualified wildfire disaster, but only 

14 to the extent the losses, expenses, or damages com15 pensated by such payment are not compensated for 

16 by insurance or otherwise. 

17 (2) QUALIFIED WILDFIRE DISASTER.—The 

18 term ‘‘qualified wildfire disaster’’ means any feder19 ally declared disaster (as defined in section 

20 165(i)(5)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) 

21 declared, after December 31, 2014, as a result of 

22 any forest or range fire. 

23 (c) DENIAL OF DOUBLE BENEFIT.—Notwith24 standing any other provision of the Internal Revenue Code 

25 of 1986— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3711 IS

1 (1) no deduction or credit shall be allowed (to 

2 the person for whose benefit a qualified wildfire re3 lief payment is made) for, or by reason of, any ex4 penditure to the extent of the amount excluded 

5 under this section with respect to such expenditure, 

6 and 

7 (2) no increase in the basis or adjusted basis of 

8 any property shall result from any amount excluded 

9 under this subsection with respect to such property. 

10 (d) LIMITATION ON APPLICATION.—This section 

11 shall only apply to qualified wildfire relief payments re12 ceived by the individual during taxable years beginning 

13 after December 31, 2019, and before January 1, 2026. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### In re RULES OF the SUPREME COURT Relating to Admissions to the Florida Bar.

No. 41068.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 28, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Article IV, Section 21 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Florida, relating to Admissions to the Bar, 32 F.S.A., is hereby amended by adding thereto subparagraph (c), which reads as follows:

> (c) Any applicant who has been refused admission by the Board or any applicant or student registrant who has proceeded through the provisions of paragraph (a) above and is the recipient of final action by the Supreme Court either denying an applicant’s admission or finding a student registrant to be unfit for admission may, within a period of not less than one calendar year from the date the Board delivered its adverse finding or from the date the Court entered such final action, whichever is later, file an appropriate petition with the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Florida in an attempt to show sufficient rehabilitation to warrant a review of the Board’s finding or the re-evaluation by the Court of its final action. After one such petition has been filed, no subsequent petitions shall be filed within three years following each adverse judgment. The Court shall fix all investigative costs to be borne by the petitioner and remitted to the Florida Board of Bar Examiners, which Board shall serve as the Court’s investigative arm in such matters.

This rule shall become effective immediately.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
#### Mack Delaney MASON, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42526.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 18, 1972.

Mack Delaney Mason, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Mack Delaney Mason filed with this Court a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging he was denied his right to an appeal following a criminal conviction. The petition presented a prima facie Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, case and we required a return from Respondent. The return has been received; it does not discuss the *Anders*issue.

Accordingly, we are herewith transferring the cause to the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, with directions to consider the same in the light of Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

March 22, 2010

AG GECC PPIF GP, LLC

Angelo, Gordon & Co., L.P.

245 Park Avenue, 26th Floor

New York, NY 10167

AG GECC PPIF GP, LLC

GE Real Estate Global Investment Management

General Electric Capital Corporation

901 Main Avenue

Norwalk, CT 06851

UST Reallocation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to (i) the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of AG GECC

PPIF Master Fund, L.P., (the “Partnership”) dated as of October 30, 2009 (as the same may be amended,

modified or supplemented from time to time, the “Partnership Agreement”) and (ii) the Loan Agreement,

dated as of the date set forth on Schedule A thereto, by and among the Partnership, as Borrower, The

Bank of New York Mellon, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and The United States

Department of the Treasury, as Lender (as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented from

time to time, the “Loan Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings

set forth in the Partnership Agreement or the Loan Agreement, as applicable.

The aggregate capital commitments of UST to the UST/TCW Senior Mortgage Securities Fund,

L.P. (the “TCW Fund”) was $1,111,111,111.00, of which $44,500,000.00 has been re-invested in other

PPIFs. Accordingly, $1,066,611,111.00 remains available for reallocation, which equates to

$133,326,388.87 per each of the other eight PPIFs.

Pursuant to Section 3.1(g) of the Partnership Agreement, UST hereby consents and the General

Partner agrees to a UST Reallocation in the amount of $133,326,388.87 to the Partnership. The revised

maximum Capital Commitment of UST (the “Maximum UST Capital Commitment”) and Maximum UST

Debt Amount (upon application of the definition of the “Maximum UST Debt Amount” in the Loan
Agreement) are set forth on Exhibit I hereto. Such allocation shall be deemed effective upon the date

hereof.

For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in the

Partnership Agreement, the Capital Commitment of UST shall at all times equal the aggregate Capital

Commitments of the Limited Partners other than UST.

* * * *


EXHIBIT I

UST REALLOCATION

Prior Capital

Commitment of UST UST Reallocation

Maximum UST

Capital Commitment *

Maximum UST Debt

Amount **

$1,111,111,111.00 133,326,388.87 $1,244,437,499.87 $2,488,874,999.74

* Provided that the amount set forth under “Maximum UST Capital Commitment” does not include an amount equal

to $26,900,000.00, which pursuant to the letter from AG GECC PPIF GP, LLC, to UST dated March 15, 2010

regarding the acceptance of certain capital previously committed to the TCW Fund shall not count against the

“Maximum UST Capital Commitment”.

** Provided that the amount set forth under “Maximum UST Debt Amount” does not include an amount equal to

$26,900,000.00, which pursuant to the letter from AG GECC PPIF GP, LLC to UST dated March 15, 2010 regarding

the acceptance of certain capital previously committed to the TCW Fund shall not count against the “Maximum UST

Debt Amount”.
#### Alma COVINGTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-761.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 4, 2022

No. 04-21-00494-CR

Harvey GUTIERREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 8, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 620144

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On May 2, 2022, we ordered the court reporter to file a supplemental reporter’s record 

containing State’s Exhibit No. 1 and State’s Exhibit No. 2 from the trial in this case. On May 3, 

2022, the court reporter notified this court that: (1) the exhibits are currently in the possession of 

the Bexar County Clerk’s Office; and (2) the clerk’s office informed her it could not release the 

exhibits to her without a direct request from this court. We therefore ORDER the Bexar County 

Clerk’s Office to release State’s Exhibit No. 1 and State’s Exhibit No. 2 to court reporter Karen 

Kane. We further ORDER Ms. Kane to file those exhibits as a supplemental reporter’s record 

within five days of the date the county clerk releases the exhibits to her.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of May, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of RedCell Power Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Cameron King, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Cameron King



Cameron King

Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer

December 22, 2003
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:18:24 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) 

To: AS_Waiver_Requests; Danielson, David; Berringer, Bryan; 'gstauffer@agamarvel.com'; 

'szbugay@arcelik.com'; 'michaelwasson@askousa.com'; 'george.e.hawranko@electrolux.com'; 

'jbaldwin@fagoramerica.com'; 'scott.davies@fisherpaykel.com'; 'earl.f.jones@ge.com'; 

'skan@haieramerica.com'; 'Michele.zeroli@indesitcompany.com'; 'jcwilliams@tekausa.com'; 

'john.taylor@lge.com'; 'spolinski@mieleusa.com'; 'mtroisi@sea.samsung.com'; 

'dbecker@vikingrange.com'; 'j_b_hoyt@whirlpool.com'; 'Nick_I_Gillespie@Whirlpool.com'; 'Cleary, 

Jennifer'; Edwards, Mike (DNbG-L) 

Cc: Sood, Sachin (PG/NA-PT) 

Subject: BSH Dishwasher Waiver Application to add additional models with Water Softening

To Whom it may concern

Attached you will find a waiver and interim waiver application to the Department of Energy for 

Dishwashers built by BSH Home Appliance Corporation that have an internal water softening system. 

This is a follow-up to waivers that were previously granted to BSH. This waiver will have a limited life, 

since the new test procedure that becomes effective on May 30, 2013 will eliminate the need for this type 

of waiver. The sole purpose of the new waiver is to add additional new models that use the same water 

softening technology. We will also send out a hard copy of this notice. 

  

Best Regards,

Mike Edwards

Dishwasher Division

Senior Development Engineer, Performance

BSH Home Appliances Corporation (DNbG)

100 Bosch Blvd., Building 102

New Bern, NC 28562-6924

mike.edwards@bshg.com

www.boschappliances.com

Phone (252) 672-9161

Fax (252) 636 4450

Please Note: The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachments, may contain legally privileged and confidential 

information intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, 

distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail 

message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this message and all copies thereof.