1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

 Washington, D.C. 20590

August 19, 2011 

FHWA: HSST: WLongstreet: ms: x60087:8/18/11

File: h://directory folder/HSST/C102A.docx 

cc: HSST Will Longstreet 

In Reply Refer To: 

 HSST/CC-102A 

Mr. Gerrit A. Dyke. P.E. 

Vice President of Engineering and R & D

Barrier Systems, Inc.

3333 Vaca Valley Parkway, Suite 800 

Vacaville, CA 95688 

Dear Mr. Dyke: 

This letter is in response to your request for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 

acceptance of a roadside safety system for use on the National Highway System (NHS).

Name of system: X-Tension Terminal at 31-inch (787-millimeter) height 

Type of system: Tangent & Flared Re-directive W-Beam Terminal 

Test Level: NCHRP Report 350 TL-3 

Testing conducted by: Safe Technologies Inc.

Date of request: December 20, 2010 

Request acknowledged: December 27, 2010 

Task Force 13 Designator: SEW19b Tangent

 SEW20b Flared 

You requested that we find this system acceptable for use on the NHS under the provisions of the 

National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 “Recommended 

Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features.”

Requirements

Roadside safety devices tested prior to January 1, 2011 should meet the guidelines contained in 

NCHRP Report 350; those tested after that date must follow the guidelines contained in the 

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials’ (AASHTO) Manual for 

Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). The FHWA Memorandum “Identifying Acceptable 

Highway Safety Features” of July 25, 1997 provides further guidance on crash testing 

requirements for longitudinal barriers.

Decision

The following system design was found acceptable, with details provided below: 

• X-Tension Terminal at 31-inch (787-millimeter) height

Archived 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
2 

Description

The original X-Tension end terminal was tested and accepted for use on the NHS in FHWA 

Acceptance Letter CC-102 for tangent, flared, and median applications. This earlier testing was 

done with the terminal set to match a guardrail height of 27 5/8 inches (702 millimeters). This 

request is for acceptance of the X-Tension set at a height of 31 inches (787 millimeters) to match 

the guardrail when installed at the higher height. The only changes made to the original X-Tension 

design were a reduction of the post embedment depths for posts #2 through #7 and the use of a 

longer Post #1 top section. The general layout of the flared, tangent, and median X-Tension designs 

and a dimensioned drawing of the longer post are shown in Enclosures 1and 2, respectively. 

Crash Testing

The required crash testing was developed in consultation with the FHWA’s Office of Safety 

Design and one test was conducted to validate the crashworthiness of the modified design. 

NCHRP Report 350 Test 3-34 was run on the flared layout of the X-Tension Terminal. This test 

was selected to address the highest occupant risk condition where the potential for small vehicle 

underride and maximum vehicular contact with the strong posts of the X-Tension are maximized. 

The cable anchor system extending from the impact head to the ground reduces the likelihood of 

the small car under riding the terminal in a head-on impact, and the increased height throughout 

the entire terminal can be expected to capture larger vehicles with little probability of override.

Test 3-34 with the 820C vehicle impacting the side of the system at the critical impact point 

(CIP) at a 15-degree angle was conducted using the flared X-Tension design at the 787-

millimeter (31-inch) height. The CIP was determined to be upstream from Post #2. Enclosure 3 

is a summary of the crash conditions and results.

Findings

You requested FHWA acceptance of the X-Tension Terminal as an NCHRP Report 350 TL-3 

Redirective W-Beam Terminal:

- X-Tension Tangent End Terminal with a 0 to 300-millimeter (0 to 1-foot) offset at a 787-

millimeter (31-inch) rail height. 

- X-Tension Flared End Terminal with an offset up to and including 1220 millimeters (48

inches) over 11.4 meters (37.5 feet) at a 787-milimeter (31-inch) rail height. 

- X-Tension Median End Terminal at a 787-millimeter (31-inch) rail height. 

These options are acceptable for use on the NHS under the range of conditions tested, when such 

use is acceptable to a highway agency.

Please note the following standard provisions that apply to FHWA letters of acceptance: 

• This letter includes an AASHTO/ARTBA/AGC Task Force 13 designation that should be 

used when drafting new or revised Task Force 13 drawings. 

Archived 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
3 

• This acceptance is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the systems and does 

not cover their structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic 

Control Devices. 

• Any changes that may adversely influence the crashworthiness of the system will require 

a new acceptance letter.

• Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service 

performance reveals unacceptable safety problems, or that the system being marketed is 

significantly different from the version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to 

modify or revoke our acceptance. 

• You will be expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and 

installation requirements to ensure proper performance. 

• You will be expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has 

essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for 

acceptance, and that it will meet the crashworthiness requirements of the FHWA and the 

NCHRP Report 350. 

• To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of acceptance is designated as number 

CC-102A and shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test 

documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and 

documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request. 

• The X-Tension Terminal system is a patented product and considered proprietary. If 

proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects, 

except exempt, non-NHS projects, (a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding 

with equally suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are 

essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally 

suitable alternative exists; or (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of 

construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. Our 

regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal 

 Regulations, Section 635.411. 

• This acceptance letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to 

use, manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent 

holder. The acceptance letter is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the 

candidate system, and the FHWA is neither prepared nor required to become involved in 

issues concerning patent law. Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant.

Sincerely yours, 

Michael S. Griffith

Director, Office of Safety Technologies

Office of Safety 

Archived 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

 Washington, D.C. 20590

August 19, 2011 

In Reply Refer To: 

 HSST/CC-102A 

Mr. Gerrit A. Dyke. P.E. 

Vice President of Engineering and R & D

Barrier Systems, Inc.

3333 Vaca Valley Parkway, Suite 800 

Vacaville, CA 95688 

Dear Mr. Dyke: 

This letter is in response to your request for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 

acceptance of a roadside safety system for use on the National Highway System (NHS).

Name of system: X-Tension Terminal at 31-inch (787-millimeter) height 

Type of system: Tangent & Flared Re-directive W-Beam Terminal 

Test Level: NCHRP Report 350 TL-3 

Testing conducted by: Safe Technologies Inc.

Date of request: December 20, 2010 

Request acknowledged: December 27, 2010 

Task Force 13 Designator: SEW19b Tangent

 SEW20b Flared 

You requested that we find this system acceptable for use on the NHS under the provisions of the 

National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 “Recommended 

Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features.”

Requirements

Roadside safety devices tested prior to January 1, 2011 should meet the guidelines contained in 

NCHRP Report 350; those tested after that date must follow the guidelines contained in the 

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials’ (AASHTO) Manual for 

Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). The FHWA Memorandum “Identifying Acceptable 

Highway Safety Features” of July 25, 1997 provides further guidance on crash testing 

requirements for longitudinal barriers.

Decision

The following system design was found acceptable, with details provided below: 

• X-Tension Terminal at 31-inch (787-millimeter) height

Archived 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
2 

Description

The original X-Tension end terminal was tested and accepted for use on the NHS in FHWA 

Acceptance Letter CC-102 for tangent, flared, and median applications. This earlier testing was 

done with the terminal set to match a guardrail height of 27 5/8 inches (702 millimeters). This 

request is for acceptance of the X-Tension set at a height of 31 inches (787 millimeters) to match 

the guardrail when installed at the higher height. The only changes made to the original X-Tension 

design were a reduction of the post embedment depths for posts #2 through #7 and the use of a 

longer Post #1 top section. The general layout of the flared, tangent, and median X-Tension designs 

and a dimensioned drawing of the longer post are shown in Enclosures 1and 2, respectively. 

Crash Testing

The required crash testing was developed in consultation with the FHWA’s Office of Safety 

Design and one test was conducted to validate the crashworthiness of the modified design. 

NCHRP Report 350 Test 3-34 was run on the flared layout of the X-Tension Terminal. This test 

was selected to address the highest occupant risk condition where the potential for small vehicle 

underride and maximum vehicular contact with the strong posts of the X-Tension are maximized. 

The cable anchor system extending from the impact head to the ground reduces the likelihood of 

the small car under riding the terminal in a head-on impact, and the increased height throughout 

the entire terminal can be expected to capture larger vehicles with little probability of override.

Test 3-34 with the 820C vehicle impacting the side of the system at the critical impact point 

(CIP) at a 15-degree angle was conducted using the flared X-Tension design at the 787-

millimeter (31-inch) height. The CIP was determined to be upstream from Post #2. Enclosure 3 

is a summary of the crash conditions and results.

Findings

You requested FHWA acceptance of the X-Tension Terminal as an NCHRP Report 350 TL-3 

Redirective W-Beam Terminal:

- X-Tension Tangent End Terminal with a 0 to 300-millimeter (0 to 1-foot) offset at a 787-

millimeter (31-inch) rail height. 

- X-Tension Flared End Terminal with an offset up to and including 1220 millimeters (48

inches) over 11.4 meters (37.5 feet) at a 787-milimeter (31-inch) rail height. 

- X-Tension Median End Terminal at a 787-millimeter (31-inch) rail height. 

These options are acceptable for use on the NHS under the range of conditions tested, when such 

use is acceptable to a highway agency.

Please note the following standard provisions that apply to FHWA letters of acceptance: 

• This letter includes an AASHTO/ARTBA/AGC Task Force 13 designation that should be 

used when drafting new or revised Task Force 13 drawings. 

Archived 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
3 

• This acceptance is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the systems and does 

not cover their structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic 

Control Devices. 

• Any changes that may adversely influence the crashworthiness of the system will require 

a new acceptance letter.

• Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service 

performance reveals unacceptable safety problems, or that the system being marketed is 

significantly different from the version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to 

modify or revoke our acceptance. 

• You will be expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and 

installation requirements to ensure proper performance. 

• You will be expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has 

essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for 

acceptance, and that it will meet the crashworthiness requirements of the FHWA and the 

NCHRP Report 350. 

• To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of acceptance is designated as number 

CC-102A and shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test 

documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and 

documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request. 

• The X-Tension Terminal system is a patented product and considered proprietary. If 

proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects, 

except exempt, non-NHS projects, (a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding 

with equally suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are 

essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally 

suitable alternative exists; or (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of 

construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. Our 

regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal 

 Regulations, Section 635.411. 

• This acceptance letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to 

use, manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent 

holder. The acceptance letter is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the 

candidate system, and the FHWA is neither prepared nor required to become involved in 

issues concerning patent law. Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant.

Sincerely yours, 

Michael S. Griffith

Director, Office of Safety Technologies

Office of Safety 

Archived 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only