1

APPENDIX A. Reclamation Transportation Needs

Assessment Tool Participant’s User Guide

Regions were provided the following guidance to enter needs into the 2018-2019 

ArcGIS Online database.

Reclamation ArcGIS Online General Entry Instructions

Access Information

1. The Reclamation Needs Assessment Tool uses the Reclamation ArcGIS Online (AGOL) platform. If

you participated in the Reclamation Road and Parking Lot Inventory data call then you should

already have access to AGOL. If you are new to AGOL, send Dan Staton (dstaton@usbr.gov) an

email for instructions on how to get an AGOL account. Enter Reclamation’s Transportation Needs

Assessment web-map using the following link (copy and paste the link into Google Chrome for

best results): 

https://usbr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6acd4261d6ed43ddb39e52cca

2114f21. This is a direct URL to the map and will prompt you to log into the Reclamation AGOL

platform.

2. Click the button for “Using your DOI-Reclamation Account”.

New Transportation Need Instructions

3. Zoom in and pan to the location your transportation need is located.

4. To create a new transportation ‘need’, click the pencil icon in the upper left that says “Create

Feature” when you hover over it.

5. Select the primary asset type that your need is related to. There will be an option to add a

secondary asset type once you get into the form.

6. Mouse over to the map. Create a polygon at the chosen location by clicking once for each vertex

of each ‘Need’ polygon. To finish the polygon, double click the mouse button. The polygons

should be rough outlines of the approximate location of each need. They do not need to be and

should not be exact. The point is to be able to see the polygon from a zoomed out view, not to
2

calculate an exact area or length.

7. After creating the ‘Need’ polygon a pop-up window should appear. If you do not like the polygon

you created, you can click the ‘Delete’ button at the bottom of the window and try again. If you

agree with the polygon created, proceed to answer the questions in the pop-up window related

to the need/project that you drew. The 6 ‐Step Needs Assessment Questions is also presented

on Pages 3-6 of this document, which provides some guidance on how to answer the questions.

Important Note: The 6 Step Needs Assessment Questions should be completed for each ‘Need’

polygon created.

8. Click ‘Close’ in the pop-up window when you are done entering information.

Existing Transportation Need Editing Instructions

NOTE: The Needs Assessment map comes loaded with the FY17 Major Rehabilitation & Replacement

(MR&R) projects related to transportation and all FY18 Federal Lands Transportation Program (FLTP)

proposed projects. For each existing transportation project (MR&R and FLTP) the following

information was populated: major rehabilitation and replacement ID number, approximate location and

shape of the project, project title, and project description. The location and project information for

each existing MR&R project should be verified by local staff and the 6 step questionnaire populated.

9. To view existing MR&R projects in your Area Office, zoom to your area office or field office (or

click the Bookmark symbol in the upper right for a list of each area office).

10. In the bottom center of the map, click the up arrow icon.

11. This brings up a tabular view of the transportation needs. Click “Filter by map extent” to bring up

a list of existing needs in your current view (zoom extent).

12. Highlight an individual row by clicking on the left most portion of the table for a particular row.

13. With the row selected, click “Zoom To” which will take you to the location of the transportation

need.

14. If you are entering information to an existing polygon, or need to re‐visit a need to enter

more information, click on the polygon, and the pop‐up window with drop‐downs will

appear. Click the triple dot (ellipses) in the lower right of the pop up window to edit the

existing shape.

15. Click the ‘Close’ button to close the edit window which automatically saves the record.

16. You can also filter the table on transportation needs in your Region by clicking “Options” and

selecting “Filter”.

17. Then Click “Add a New Expression,” change the drop down to “A.1 Location of USBR Need” and

change the drop down to your Region.

18. Once you complete the transportation needs for your office, all values in the table should be

populated.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 1. Fill in MR&R ID, Facility Name, and Needs Description

Question/Field Guidance and Definitions 

Major Rehabilitation & Replacement (MR&R) 

ID Number 

If MR&R number/code is already entered review and 

update using the editing instructions on page 2. 

If entering a new need that is not on the map yet, 

add an MR&R number if it exists, otherwise leave 

blank. 

Insert Project Name Example: Senator Wash or XYZ Bridge 

Insert need description Short description of the need or project: 

Rehabilitate and pave Senator Wash Road 

including fix drainage and replace culverts 

Step 2. Complete Region

Question/Field Guidance and Definitions 

A.1. Location of USBR Need 

Choose the Region the need or project is located 

within. 

Step 3. Complete Transportation Need Asset(s) Description

Question/Field Guidance and Definitions 

B.1. Asset Type (Primary) 

Select the primary asset type the need is related 

to. 

B.2. Asset Type (Secondary; choice option for 

Projects that include two asset types) 

Optional Question: If the need relates to two asset 

types, use this field to select the second asset type. 

If more than two assets types are included in the 

need, please pick the two primary assets and use 

Step 1 to further explain the larger project. (For 

example: Rehabilitate access road and bridge, 

including replacement of several culverts). 

Choose N/A if need does not include more than 

one asset type. 

3
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 3. Complete Transportation Need Asset(s) Description (continued) 

B.3. Agency with Ownership 

Choices include: USBR, Other Federal, State, County, 

Water District or Water User Groups, Local Entity, 

Other Governmental Entity, and Tribal. 

Local Entity generally encompasses a single town 

or city. 

Other Governmental Entities would include things 

like Metropolitan Planning Organizations, Councils 

of Government, and Regional Councils. Generally 

these agencies boundaries include multiple town, 

cities, and/or counties. MPOs are created by 

federal law to provide local, elected officials input 

into the planning and federal transportation funds 

to metropolitan areas with populations of greater 

than 50,000. Regional Councils, COGs, or similar, 

have state and locally defined boundaries and may 

be part of delivering a variety of federal, state, and 

local programs. 

If ownership of the facility is unknown, or this is a 

proposed facility that does not exist yet, leave blank. 

B.3. Agency with Ownership (continued) 

If you are unsure which group owns or maintains 

the asset, a best guess should be made. 

B.4. Agency with O&M Responsibility 

Choices are the same and follow the same 

guidance as Agency with Ownership. Choose the 

agency that operates and maintains the asset on 

which the project or need it located. 

If maintenance of the facility is unknown, or this 

is a proposed facility that does not exist yet, 

leave blank. 

4
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 4. Complete Transportation Need(s) Priority

Question/Field Guidance and Definitions 

C.1. Priority of the Need Relative to Your

Region

A low, medium, or high priority should be defined 

by your perspective/discipline, unless further 

guidance is provided to you by your Regional 

Office. 

The final list of all needs and priority ranks for your 

Region will go through an amendment process 

with each Region’s FLTP coordinator. 

Step 5. Complete Proposed Improvement(s) Description

Question/Field Guidance and Definitions 

D.1. Proposed Improvement

Choose the answer that is your best guess of the 

type of project needed to address the need you 

have entered. 

Capital is generally defined as constructing or 

investing in something new, often using new or 

additional materials outside of what already exists 

on the facility. It can also include reconstruction of 

a facility that requires significant investment of new 

materials and work to bring it back to its original (or 

better) standard. 

Maintenance is generally defined as typical 

activities undertaken to preserve an asset that has 

been built, installed, bought, etc. 

D.2. Estimated Improvement Cost

Estimate the range of cost for this improvement. 

5
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 6. Complete Need Area Assessment: answer questions below

related to the transportation need

Recreation Usage and Economic Generation

Question/Field Guidance and Definitions 

RE.1. What type of site(s) does the asset 

access? 

The answer chosen should relate to the stated 

need, the asset the project would be on to address 

that need, and what use that asset is accessing. If 

the site is a recreational use area that is also an 

economic generator for the area, choose 

Recreation site, and register the economic benefit 

in the last question of this section. 

RE.2. What is the status of the existing access? Report the current existing access on the asset to 

the site. 

RE.3. What is the desired access to the site(s)? If the desired access is new or different than the 

existing access, use this field to report desired. 

RE.4. What is the level of visitation at the site? Report from your perspective/discipline unless 

further guidance is provided to you by your 

Regional Office. Generally the visitation level 

should be based on a year round average. If there 

are only a few weekends a year when the site is 

over capacity then this would not be High. High 

would be used when there are numerous 

events/weekends/holidays where the site is over 

capacity throughout the year. 

RE.5. What is the benefit to the Local Economy 

from this area? 

A low, medium, or high benefit should be defined 

by your perspective/discipline, unless further 

guidance is provided to you by your Regional 

Office. 

Safety

S.1. What type of user does the Safety concern 

primarily relate to? 

Report the most prominent user or user group the 

safety concern for this need relates to. 

S.2. How big is the safety risk? Base your rating on frequency and severity of the 

safety issue the need involves. 

S.3. Select the most applicable type of Safety 

concern related to the 'Need'. 

Report the most prominent type of safety concern 

related to the ‘Need.’ 

6
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

System Preservation

SP.1. What best describes the existing Choose the existing condition of the asset(s) based 

condition of the asset(s) associated to the on your perspective/discipline, unless further 

Need? guidance is provided to you by your Regional 

Office. 

SP. 2. What best describes the current, primary 

funding status? 

Choose the source of primary funding for the 

project. If none has been identified or it is not 

known, choose No funds committed/planned. 

SP.3. What best describes the current, 

secondary funding source? 

If secondary funding is supporting the project, 

choose which source from the list. If there is no 

secondary funding source choose Not Applicable. 

If more than two sources of funding are already 

identified to fund the need, just enter the two 

predominant sources. 

SP.4. How will the project improve the USBR 

Transportation System? 

Answer based on your perspective/discipline, 

unless further guidance is provided to you by your 

Regional Office. 

SP.5. What is the risk of 'Turn Back'? 

Turn Back is defined as “an action taken by a 

Federal or non-Federal managing partner that 

ultimately results in having all recreation 

responsibilities being transferred or conveyed back 

to Reclamation for its sole management.” It is 

Reclamation’s goal to avoid Turn Backs if at all 

possible. If this area is managed by a managing 

partner, select a low, medium, or high Turn Back 

risk based on your perspective/discipline, unless 

further guidance is provided to you by your 

Regional Office. If this area is managed by 

Reclamation, then select ‘Not Applicable.’ 

Have questions or need assistance? Please contact:

• Laurie Miskimins, Transportation Planner, FHWA-Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division 720-963-3455 laurie.miskimins@dot.gov 

• Dan Staton, O&M Structures Program Manager, 

USBR 303-445-3858 dstaton@usbr.gov 

• Greg Gault, BORGIS System 

Manager/Architect 208-378-5325 

ggault@usbr.gov 

7
 

 

 

Appendix B. Summary Tables from the 2018-2019 Transportation Needs Assessment 

Table. 1. Complete List of Entries with Basic Project Details 

The following table includes the basic project information entered into the ArcGIS Online tool for the 354 entries in the 2018-2019 Transportation Needs Assessment. It includes all project information through Step 5, as 

explained in Appendix A. A few notes about the entries include: 

A. Project Name: A * indicates a project that the Region identified to be on a facility only providing Administrative Access/Use Only. There were 26 projects identified by the Regions to be on these facilities. Most 

funding available for transportation projects can only be used on facilities providing public access. 

C. Region: Originally entered before the DOI standardized region names across all DOI agencies. The table has been updated to reflect the DOI region each need falls within. 

J. Estimated Median Cost for the Improvement: Regions were provided a cost range to choose from in estimating the cost of the need entered. A median cost was assigned to each entry based on the range they 

chose, to assess overall magnitude of need for the LRTP. Further scoping will be needed to refine the costs for each need. 

If a cell is blank, it means FLH and Reclamation were unable to determine/verify that answer with the Region in time to complete the LRTP analysis. The database remains online and can be edited by Reclamation 

staff. The online version should be referenced for the most up-to-date information. Information about each need is subject to change with further scoping. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Center Point Rd 11 miles Overlay asphalt 

ArkansasRio GrandeTexas Gulf Roadway Not Applicable County County High Capital $2,500,000 

Buster Heights Boat 

Ramp, Tent, and 

Swim Beach Overlay asphalt 

ArkansasRio GrandeTexas Gulf Parking Lot Not Applicable USBR State Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Hog Creek 

Campground 5 miles of Overlay asphalt 

ArkansasRio GrandeTexas Gulf Roadway Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $2,500,000 

Folsom Granite Bay Road repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Roadway State State Low Capital $2,500,000 

Folsom Beals Point Road Repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Roadway State State Low Capital $2,500,000 

Lake Berryessa 

Concession Areas 

South Road repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Roadway USBR USBR Low Capital $2,500,000 

Folsom Dam Repaving 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR High Capital $2,500,000 

Lake Berryessa 

Concession Areas 

West Road repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $2,500,000 

Auburn Interface 

Roads Road repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $2,500,000 

New Melones 

Recreation Area 

Access Roads Road repair, sealing and striping 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Folsom South Canal 

Bike Trail 

Safety Improvements for Folsom 

South Canal Bike Trail 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Trail Not Applicable USBR USBR Capital $2,500,000 

Shasta Dam Visitor 

Center Parking Lot 

Repair, seal coat, and re-stripe 

parking lot, and include PV 

shade structures 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Parking Lot USBR USBR High Maintenance $2,500,000 

Oak Shores Road surface repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Roadway USBR USBR Medium Maintenance $2,500,000 

Juniper Canyon 

Road slide repairs 

Repair and reinforce slide areas 

on Juniper Canyon Road. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Roadway USBR County High Capital $2,500,000 

Owyhee Road 

Repairs 

Design road to improve sight 

distance , widen and replace 

sections were asphalt is 

crumbling; 3.5 m 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Roadway County County High Capital $2,500,000 

Tualatin Project -

Buried Irrigation

Pipe System -

Plan to replace roads when

lateral pipes are excavated and

replaced in entire system;

locate pipes

ColumbiaPacific

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR County High Capital $2,500,000
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Thief Valley Dam 

Road Realignment; 

1.3 miles Realign road when dam is raised 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable County County Medium Capital $2,500,000 

American Falls, 

Willow Bay Rec Area 

Redesign for parking lots, 

resurface asphalt roads; 3 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR 

Local Entity 

(Town, City, 

Public Works, 

etc.) Medium 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $2,500,000 

Lake Owyhee State 

Park Transportation 

Facilities 

Widen roads in State Park; 

chipseal roads and parking lots; 

2.5 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR State High Capital $2,500,000 

Cascade State Parks 

Road Repair 3.5 miles of Road Repairs 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR State High Maintenance $2,500,000 

Emigrant Dam 

alternative access 

road improvements 

Acquire right to use road as 

alternate access to Emigrant dam 

and harded road for all seasons 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway USBR Low Capital $2,500,000 

American Falls Reconstruct Concrete Trail; 3 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Trail USBR USBR Medium Capital $2,500,000 

McGrath Road 

Construct new vehicle bridge (.1 

miles) at McGrath Road. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Capital $2,500,000 

BPA Power Line 

Access Bridge 

Construct new vehicle bridge (.1 

miles) to access BPA power line.* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Capital $2,500,000 

North Unit Main 

Canal - "Radlands" 

Reinforce barriers along 7 miles to 

discourage mud-bogging on 

canal embankments. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Maintenance $2,500,000 

Turn bays for Hwy 97 

to Haystack 

Construct turn lanes on Hwy 97 to 

Jericho Rd for safe ingress/egress 

to Haystack. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Capital $2,500,000 

Barnes Butte Trail 

Design and construct pedestrian 

trail through IronHorse. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Capital $2,500,000 

Alternate route for 

scenic bikeway 

Design and contr. bike trail on 

canal service road as alternate 

(off-vehicle road) scenic bike trl. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Capital $2,500,000 

Imperial Dam 

Rd repair Sen Wash Rd/McKinley 

Rd to Sen Wash Rd/County S24 & 

Sen Wash Rd/Ferguson Rd to So 

End Loop 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR County Low Capital $2,500,000 

Imperial Dam 

Road repair Senator Wash 

Road/McKinley Road to Squaw 

Lake 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR County Low Capital $2,500,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Parker Dam - Bldgs 

& Grounds 

Access road and guardrail 

replacement 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Hoover Dam - Bldgs 

& Grounds Rock fall mitigation 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Medium Maintenance $2,500,000 

Camp O Road Increase public access and safety 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Laguna Dam 

Road repair Gila Gravity Mittry 

Boat Ramp to North Boat Ramp 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Boat Ramp USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Capital $2,500,000 

WMA roads west 1-5 miles build up with gravel* 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Low Maintenance $2,500,000 

Goose Bay north 1-5 miles build up with gravel 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Maintenance $2,500,000 

Sumner Dam 

Rock bridge repair; 7-8 bridges 

needing repair; 2 major structures 

needing repair 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Bridge Bridge USBR State Low Capital $2,500,000 

El Vado State Park 

Dam Bridge Repair dam bridge 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Bridge Roadway USBR State Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Vega State Park 

Roads 

Repave all paved roads in Vega 

State Park 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Low Capital $2,500,000 

Crawford Park Roads 

Repave 

Repaving and resurface of Interior 

roads in Crawford State Park; 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Low Capital $2,500,000 

Rio Grande Complex 

Access road repair; possible 

resurfacing; 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Roadway USBR State Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Navajo State Park 

Roads 

~ 3.5 miles of Repave interior 

roads of Navajo State Park 

(Colorado Side) 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Medium Capital $2,500,000 

El Vado Lake State 

Park Main Access Road Rehab 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Elephant Butte Lake 

State Park Lakeshore Drive Repaving 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Sumner Lake State 

Park Section #2 

Repave roads in State Park; 

Connected to need 566 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Sumner Lake State 

Park 

Repave roads in state park; part of 

need 566 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Brantley Lake State 

Park Road Section 1 

Repave roads in state park; part of 

need 568 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Medium Capital $2,500,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Brantley Lake State 

Park Roads Section 2 

Repave roads in state park; part of 

need 567 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Caballo Lake State 

Park Improvements 

Repave roads Riverside 

Campground 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Fontenelle Dam 

Powerplant Access Rd.; 1.5 miles; 

pave road; overlook 

improvements 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR High Capital $2,500,000 

Elephant Butte 

Damsite 

~ 2 miles of Road rehabilitation of 

Damsite and Recreation Areas. 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $2,500,000 

Morrow Point Dam; 

1.5 miles 

pulverize and repave w/ 3 in 

asphalt 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Blue Mesa Dam 

Gravel to asphalt; Access Road 

Repair; 1.5 miles 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Flaming Gorge Dam 

Pave Powerplant Rd. partial 

paving; repair and resurface 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Ridges Basin Dam 

Connect Powerline to Dam 

access* 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Bridge USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Capital $2,500,000 

Sumner Lake State 

Park Dam bridge 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Bridge Roadway USBR Medium Capital $2,500,000 

El Vado Lake State 

Park Bridge Rehab Dam bridge rehabilitation 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Bridge Not Applicable USBR Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Percha Dam State 

Park Entrance bridge and road rehab 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Bridge USBR Medium Capital $2,500,000 

Visitor Center 

Parking Lot Overlay asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Parking Lot Not Applicable USBR State Medium Capital $750,000 

Maidu Drive Resurface of road 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway USBR 

Other 

Governmental 

Entity (MPO, 

COG, Regional 

Councils, etc.) Medium Capital $750,000 

Nimbus Flat and 

Fishery parking lot repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Roadway USBR State Low Capital $750,000 

Folsom Folsom Point Road repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Boat Ramp State State Low Capital $750,000 

Folsom Browns 

Ravine Road repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Roadway State State Low Capital $750,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Negro Bar Road repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Roadway State State Low Capital $750,000 

Mammoth Bar 

Parking Lot reorientation and 

flood protecting 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Roadway State State Low Capital $750,000 

Auburn Confluence 

Parking Realign roadside parking 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Roadway State State Medium Capital $750,000 

Folsom Peninsula road repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Parking Lot State State Low Capital $750,000 

Sliger Mine-Ruck-aChucky Road repair CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway State State Low Capital $750,000 

Birdsall Road 

Raft take-out eliminated during 

significant flood event 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Boat Ramp USBR State Medium Capital $750,000 

Ponderosa Road grading and resurfacing, drainage 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway USBR State Medium Capital $750,000 

Lake Clementine 

roads Road repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Parking Lot State State Medium Capital $750,000 

Jedediah Smith Trail trail repair/maintenance 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Trail Culvert USBR State Low Capital $750,000 

Lahontan State Park 

Chipseal 

Pavement Maintenance 

Requirements 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Roadway USBR State Low Maintenance $750,000 

Parking Lot and Road 

Maintenance 

Existing roads and parking lots 

need maintenance 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Medium Maintenance $750,000 

Steele Canyon Boat 

Ramp 

Replace boat ramp surface 

undercut by erosion 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Boat Ramp USBR USBR Medium Capital $750,000 

Ponderosa Bridge bridge replacement 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Bridge USBR USBR Medium Capital $750,000 

Keswick Office 

Building (KOB) 

Grade, pave, and stripe the 

parking areas around the KOB* 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Parking Lot USBR USBR High Capital $750,000 

Lake Berryessa 

Concession Areas 

Pleasure Cove Road Repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Roadway USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 

Lake Berryessa 

Concession Area 

Markley Cove Road Repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Roadway USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 

Capell Cove Resurface 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Boat Ramp USBR USBR Medium Capital $750,000 

Knickerbocker roads Road repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 

Melones Dam Area Road repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 

Yankee JIms 

Road Repair in coordination 

w/county bridge replacement 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Bridge USBR USBR Medium Capital $750,000 

Tule Lake Leases Road Improvements 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Other Federal USBR Capital $750,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Clear Creek Bridge 

Guard Rail 

Install a guardrail system that 

meets current AASHTO standards. 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Bridge Roadway USBR USBR Low Maintenance $750,000 

Nimbus Powerplant Powerplant Improvements 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Capital $750,000 

San Justo Dam Move road off Dike 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Capital $750,000 

East Side Road 

Resurfacing with aggregate, regrading, culvert repairs CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Culvert USBR Medium Maintenance $750,000 

American Falls; 

Sportsman Park 

Resurface asphalt roads and 

parking lot; 1.5 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Roadway USBR County Medium Capital $750,000 

Emigrant Reservoir -

Greensprings Spur 

Road - Surf 

Pave road to improve recreation 

access in all seasons. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway USBR County Low Capital $750,000 

Emigarnt Reservoir -

Sampson Creek Road 

- Recreati 

Pave road to improve recreation 

access in all season; 5 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway USBR County Low Capital $750,000 

Emigrant Reservoir -

Sampson Creek Road 

- Intersec 

Reconstruct intersection of road 

with Hwy 66 to Jackson County 

stds & dedicate road to county; 

.25m 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway USBR County Low Capital $750,000 

Emig Res.Sampson 

Creek Road - hill cut 

improvement 

Cut road further into hillside to 

widen road to provide alternate 

access to Emigrant dam; .25 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway USBR County Low Capital $750,000 

Thief Valley 

Relocation 

Relocate campground if dam is 

raised; .7 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Boat Ramp USBR County Low Capital $750,000 

Bully Creek 

Accessibility 

Upgrades 

Replace bathrooms/showers with 

accessible buildings 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR County Medium Capital $750,000 

Upper Mann Creek 

Realignment 

Realign road to improve line of 

sight; .5 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable County County Medium Capital $750,000 

Jackson Road Realignment Realign road to improve line of 

sight 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable County County Medium Capital $750,000 

Teton Canyon Access 

Road Repair 

Chip seal Teton Canyon Access 

Rd. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR County High Maintenance $750,000 

Yeoman Bridge 

Construct new vehicle bridge (.25 

miles)over North Unit Main Canal 

at Yeoman Road. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway 

Local 

Entity(Town, City, 

Public Works, 

etc.) High Capital $750,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Wickiup Res Cascade 

Lakes Hwy Davis 

Creek crossing 

Reconfigure culvert to allow safe 

passage for swimmers under the 

crossing at low pool. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Culvert Roadway County Other Federal High Capital $750,000 

Hyatt Reservoir -

Recreation Area 

Sewage Plant - A 

Reconstruct road to access 

sewage plant and provide all 

weather access; 1 mile 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway USBR Other Federal Low Capital $750,000 

Unity Boat Ramp 

Realignment 

Realign Boat Ramp , improve 

reservoir access 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR State High Capital $750,000 

Crooked River ford 

Improve ford to allow vehicle 

crossing most of the year. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR State Medium Capital $750,000 

Unity Parking Lot 

Upgrades 

Parking Lot Redesign and 

Expansion 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Boat Ramp USBR State Medium Capital $750,000 

Juniper Canyon Road 

slide repairs 

Repair and reinforce slide area on 

county road. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $750,000 

Roberts Bay Road 

Improve road design and surface 

to provide safe passage for 

recreational vehicles. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $750,000 

Prineville Reservoir -

County Boat Ramp 

Road - Sur 

Pave the road to the county boat 

ramp; 2 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Low Capital $750,000 

Sugarloaf Trails 

Upgrade 

Upgrade trails with concrete to 

meet accessibility standards; 2.5 

miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $750,000 

Steamboat Rock Chip 

Seal 

Large cracks perpendicular to 

roadway. Repair 4.5 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Medium Maintenance $750,000 

Bowman Dam - Hwy 

Access Route -

Crooked Riv Bikeway 

Find ways to improve route to 

separate bikes from vehicle traffic; 

20 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Roadway State State Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $750,000 

Emigrant Dam access 

road 

Acquire right to use the road to 

access Emigrant Dam; 10 miles* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway USBR High Agreement(s) $750,000 

Buelah Boat Ramp 

Replacment Replace Boat ramp and Boat dock 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 

C-Line Pumping 

Plant Access Brid 

∩éo Needs major rehabilitation or

replacement 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway USBR USBR High Capital $750,000 

N. Unit Main Hwy 97 

at Brown Rd and 

Meadowlark Rd 

Improve connections to provide 

safer highway crossings for 

ditchriders. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Culvert Roadway USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Mann Creek Road 

Paving; .5 miles regrade and pave access road 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR High Capital $750,000 

N. Unit Main Canal 

Willow Crk Siphon 

Access Road 

Survey alignment of connecting 

road to siphon switchbacks and 

wasteway. Acquire ROW. Improve 

road* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 

Emigrant Dam 

alternative access 

road 

Confirm right to use road as 

alternate access to Emigrant dam 

and harden road for all seasons.* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway USBR Low Capital $750,000 

Scooteney Day Use 

TN 

Evaluate and re-gravel 8 miles of 

necessary road 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Trail USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 

O'Sullivan Dam Toe 

Road 

Construction a single lane road 

along the downstream toe of 

O'Sullivan Dam; 3 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 

N. Unit Main Canal 

Big Cut Access Road 

& Slope Ref 

Reinforce hillsides to keep 

ditchrider road open. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Maintenance $750,000 

Sampson Creek 

Bridge 

Reconstruct bridge to improve 

load-bearing to provide alternate 

access to Emigrant dam. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Capital $750,000 

Pioneer Loop Road 

Bridge 

Construct new vehicle bridge (.1 

miles) and tunnel sewer 

interceptor under North Unit Main 

Canal. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Capital $750,000 

Ochoco - Service 

Roads - Vehicle 

Gates - Installation 

Install solar powered gates on all 

intersections of roads and earthen 

laterals. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Capital $750,000 

North Unit Main 

Canal - Vehicle Gates 

- Install 

Install solar powered gates on 

intersections of roads with 

laterals. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Operations $750,000 

North Unit Main 

Canal - Bend to 

Burma 

Study feasibility of an urban canal 

trail or transit train along 35 miles; 

Bend to Smith Rock SP. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Roadway 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $750,000 

Parking lot for 

extension canal 

pump 

Remove gas line cathodic 

protection and guardrail so that 

district can access irrigation 

pump. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Capital $750,000 

Imperial Dam 

Road repair Senator Wash 

Road/McKinley Road to Imperial 

Dam 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR County Low Capital $750,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Horse Mesa Dam -

Bldgs & Grounds Road improvements 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Low Maintenance $750,000 

Davis Dam - Bldgs & 

Grounds 

Replace section of Davis Dam 

Access Road and visitor parking 

lot 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 

Laguna Dam 

Road repair Gila Gravity Laguna 

Dam to Mittry Boat Ramp 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Boat Ramp USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Capital $750,000 

Kirwin Res. roads & 

boat ramps 

Rip rap erosion control to protect 

access roads and boat ramp 

upgrades 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Boat Ramp USBR Other Federal Medium Capital $750,000 

Shadehill Rec Area 

Shoreline 

stabilization 

Main access to Rec area is 

threatened by shoreline erosion 

unable to move due boundary 

proximity 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Transit System USBR State High Capital $750,000 

Dickinson 

biking/walking 

bridge 

move old canal bridge into 

crossing 

Missouri 

Basin Bridge Trail USBR USBR Medium Capital $750,000 

Lake Tschida access 

road reinforce road 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway County USBR High Capital $750,000 

East Shore Drive 

South road 

Less than a mile of millings, 

possible FLAP 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 

Medicine Creek Dam 

Road County Rd 728 

5 miles of Resurfacing and 

replacing guard railing 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 

Crittendon DUA road 

Less than a mile build up with 

gravel 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Maintenance $750,000 

Alcova Res Cabin 

Area road repairs 

Roads at cabin need improvement 

for public safety for first 

responder access 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway USBR County Low Maintenance $750,000 

Chama River Foot 

Bridge 

Redesign and rebuild structurally 

unsound foot bridge over the Rio 

Chama 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Bridge Trail USBR State Medium Capital $750,000 

Resurfsce Navajo 

Lake State Park 

Roads 

Gravel and regrade gravel 

sections 3 miles; paved 5.5 miles 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Low Capital $750,000 

Miracle Mile Access 

road & boat ramps 

Improve access road and install 

two concrete boat ramps 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Boat Ramp USBR State Medium Capital $750,000 

Animas-La Plata 

Replace railcar superstructure 

bridge on the Mitigation Lands 

Area with a properly engineered 

bridge* 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Bridge Roadway USBR USBR Medium Capital $750,000 

Shoshone River 

Access site 

Resurface road & parking lotimprove drainage 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Parking Lot Roadway USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Ocean Lake Access 

Roads 

Access roads sinking- raise road 

surfaces 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Capital $750,000 

Deaver Reservoir 

Access Roads 

Road maintenance and 

resurfacing 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Maintenance $750,000 

Heart Mountain 

Canal Access Bridge 

Construct bridge to provide 

public access across canal 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Bridge Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Capital $750,000 

Ridges Basin Dam Rehab Power Line Rd; 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Trail USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Capital $750,000 

Towaoc Canal 

Rehab All Access roads; several 

short seg 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Capital $750,000 

Sites-Lodoga Road 

Reconstruction 

Project 

Roadway reconstruction to road 

base/hill cut expansion/widen 

shoulders/rock fall prevent/metal 

rail 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway County County Medium Capital $6,000,000 

Hagg Lake Road 

Slide Repairs and 

Anchor Wall 

Construct anchor wall to stabilize 

potential landslide (.24 miles) 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable County County Low Capital $6,000,000 

Teton River Canyon 

Redesign and rehabilitate 

overlook, admin site, parking lots, 

roads, & 2 access points on river 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR High Capital $6,000,000 

Grand Coulee Dam 

Visitor Center 

Parking Lot Areas 

1 mile of Asphalt Road repair; also 

repair parking areas at the 

roadside interp sites 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR High Maintenance $6,000,000 

Horse Mesa Dam -

Bldgs & Grounds Rockfall mitigation 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Low Maintenance $6,000,000 

Yuma Desalting Plant Railroad spur repair 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Transit System Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Capital $6,000,000 

Belle Fourche 

Reservoir Suzie Peak 

Road paving 

Need for Suzie Peak Road Paving 

to create better access to 

Recreation and reduce 

maintenance (4.4 m) 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR High Capital $6,000,000 

Crystal East Portal 

Road 

Paving of East Portal Road, 5 miles 

at steepest grade; resurfacing and 

repairs; 7.1 miles 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR High Capital $6,000,000 

Grassy Hollow Rd 3 miles Overlay Asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Roadway Not Applicable County County High Capital $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Potapo Pass Boat 

Ramp Parking Overlay asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Parking Lot Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $250,000 

Hog Creek Day Use 

Parking Overlay Asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Parking Lot Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $250,000 

Turkey Pass, Calyspo 

Cove Parking Areas Overlay asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Parking Lot Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $250,000 

Fishermans Point and 

Little River BR 

Parking Overlay Asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Parking Lot Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $250,000 

Alameda Dr. 1.5 miles of Overlay Asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Roadway Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $250,000 

Potapo Pass 

campground Rd 2 miles Overlay asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Roadway Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $250,000 

Turkey Pass, Calyspo 

Cover rds 5 miles of Overlay Asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Roadway Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $250,000 

South Dam Rd Overlay Asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Roadway Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $250,000 

Little River and 

Fishermans Point Rds 1 mile of Overlay Asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Roadway Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $250,000 

Buster Heights 

Campground and 

Boat Ramp Rd 2 miles Overlay asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Medium Capital $250,000 

Visitor Center Rd 5 miles Over Lay Asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Medium Capital $250,000 

Altus Dam Canal bridge repair 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Bridge Capital $250,000 

Repave Stampede 

Dam Road 

Pavement is cracking along dam 

crest in multiple locations 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Roadway USBR Other Federal Low Maintenance $250,000 

Prosser Creek Road 

Rehabilitation 

High maintenance requirements 

after winter closure and 

infrequent maintenance from 

County 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Roadway Other Federal Other Federal Low Maintenance $250,000 

Rattlesnake Bar 

Parking lot maintenance and 

repair 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Boat Ramp State State Low Maintenance $250,000 

Salmon Falls 

Parking lot maintenance and 

resurface 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Boat Ramp State State Low Maintenance $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Putah Canyon Ramp 

Replace failing boat ramp 

currently undercutting from 

erosion 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Boat Ramp USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Mountain Quarries 

Bridge 

Safety Inspection and 

replacement of railing system for 

Mountain Quarries Bridge. 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Bridge Not Applicable USBR USBR Capital $250,000 

Clear Lake Dam Road 

Periodic grading and maintenance 

of roadway* 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Roadway Other Federal USBR High Maintenance $250,000 

Livingston Stone 

N'tnl Fish Hatchery 

access road 

Repair/Replace/Re-condition 

pavement, and re-paint all lines 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Roadway USBR USBR High Maintenance $250,000 

Keswick Powerplant 

access road 

Crack seal, and re-coat road and 

parking area to Keswick 

Powerplant 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Roadway USBR USBR High Maintenance $250,000 

Putah South Canal Road Maintenance 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

Area K 

Periodic grading and maintenance 

of roadway 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Roadway Other Federal USBR Medium Maintenance $250,000 

A Canal Recreation 

Trail 

Periodic crack sealing and 

maintenance of pavement 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Trail Trail USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

Lahontan Dam Road 

Chipseal 

Maintenance as required for 

paved access 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Maintenance $250,000 

Power Plant Road 

Rehablitation 

Re-grade and add gravel to allow 

easier access during adverse 

weather conditions 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Maintenance $250,000 

San Luis Canal Bridge Sesimic refitting 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Bridge Capital $250,000 

New Melones 

Restroom Restroom replacement 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Capital $250,000 

Tracy Fish Collection 

Facility Replace boatdock 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Parking Lot Capital $250,000 

New Melones 

Entrance Fee Station Fee Station Repairs 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Capital $250,000 

Keswick Dam Security fencing and access road 

CaliforniaGreat Basin Roadway Capital $250,000 

Gordan Gulch 

Parking Area 

Expansion Construct additional parking 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Boat Ramp USBR County High Capital $250,000 

Storm Breacker Road 

Repaving 

stabilize subsurface to prevent 

road slumping and replace cattle 

guard 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Culvert USBR County High Capital $250,000 

Ririe, Juniper 

Recreation Area 

Road & Parking lot Repair; 

resurface all roads (asphalt and 

gravel); 2.5 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR County Medium Capital $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Emigrant Reservoir -

Fishing & Swimming 

Rocks Tr 

Create an accessible trail along 

pool's edge to provide access to 

fishing and swimming spots; .25m 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Parking Lot USBR County Low Capital $250,000 

Prineville Reservoir -

Salt Creek Road -

Periodic 

Periodically grade, gravel and 

apply dust abatement to gravel 

road; 20 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Roadway County County Low Maintenance $250,000 

Scoggins Spillway 

Bridge 

Evaluate .1 miles of guardrails for 

compliance with current 

standards. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway USBR County Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Smith Rock to 

Haystack 

Study potential to provide a trail 

from Smith Rock State Park to 

Haystack Reservoir. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Roadway County County Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Black Canyon Dam 

Road Office Access; 

.25 miles 

Cut and replace road sections that 

are crumbling 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Roadway 

Local 

Entity(Town, 

City, Public 

Works, etc.) 

Local 

Entity(Town, City, 

Public Works, 

etc.) High Maintenance $250,000 

Donnelly 

Maintenance 

Regrade and re-gravel roads and 

parking; .25 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR 

Local 

Entity(Town, City, 

Public Works, 

etc.) Low Maintenance $250,000 

North Dam Park 

Resurfacing 

All roads and parking areas need 

to be re- graveled, unnecessary 

roads should be closed. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Trail USBR 

Local 

Entity(Town, City, 

Public Works, 

etc.) Low Maintenance $250,000 

Hagg Lake Private 

Access Easements 

Survey & Doc 

Locate and survey as-constructed 

alignments of private access 

easements (2 mile created by 

contract. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable 

Local 

Entity(Town, 

City, Public 

Works, etc.) 

Local 

Entity(Town, City, 

Public Works, 

etc.) Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Hagg Lake Private 

Access Easement: 

Survey and Buil 

Survey private access easement 

created by contract but not 

deeded. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable 

Local 

Entity(Town, 

City, Public 

Works, etc.) 

Local 

Entity(Town, City, 

Public Works, 

etc.) Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Wasco Dam Access 

Road-OHV Access 

Point Closures 

Assist USFS to curtail off-road 

vehicle access points from dam 

access road. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Trail Other Federal Other Federal Low Agreement(s) $250,000 

Emigrant Reservoir -

Carter Creek Siphon -

Road Dr 

Improve drainage on road to 

protect downslope and access to 

siphon;.25 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Culvert USBR Other Federal Low Capital $250,000 

Wickiup Dam -

Subdivision Access 

Roads 

Pave subdivision access roads to 

improve fire egress and winter 

emergency access; 20 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable Other Federal Other Federal Low Capital $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Deadwood Airstrip 

Airstrip needs tree removal, 

signage, and grading; .5 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Not Applicable Other Federal Other Federal Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Wickiup Dam -

Burgess Road & 

USFS Rd 44 - All 

Weat 

Periodically grade, gravel, and use 

dust abatement -- or pave the 

road to Wickiup; 20 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable Other Federal Other Federal Low Maintenance $250,000 

Deadwood Road 

Maintenance Grading Roads; 5.5 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable State Other Federal Low Maintenance $250,000 

Deadwood Access 

Roads Repair Grading and re-gravel 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable Other Federal Other Federal Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Concession boat 

ramp 

Remove or relocate boat ramp 

when concession expires. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR State Medium Capital $250,000 

Prineville Reservoir -

Powder House Cove 

- Boat Ra 

Extend boat ramp to low pool; .25 

miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR State Medium Capital $250,000 

Bowman - ford 

Improve ford across Crooked 

River below Bowman Dam. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway USBR State High Capital $250,000 

Prineville Reservoir -

Reservoir Bridge -

Design a 

Construct a bridge to connect 

North and South shores; .1 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway USBR State High Capital $250,000 

N. Unit Main Box 

Hwy Culvert - Lat M58 and Hwy 97 

Enlarge box culvert to prevent 

backflow and spills.* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Culvert Roadway USBR State Low Capital $250,000 

Palisades 

Resurface parking lot and replace 

interpretive signs 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Parking Lot State State Low Capital $250,000 

Bottero Subdivision 

Access Rd 

Improve road to county standards 

and dedicate it to the county. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Medium Capital $250,000 

Bully Creek Pathway 

Replacement 

vegetation is growing through the 

asphalt and the trail no longer 

meets standards, crumbling; .25 m 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Parking Lot USBR State High Capital $250,000 

Osborn BayState 

Boat Ramp 

Ramp is cracking and breaking in 

places. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Boat Ramp Not Applicable USBR State Medium Maintenance $250,000 

McCormack Asphalt 

Chip Seal fill cracks and chip seal roads; .25 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR State High Maintenance $250,000 

Unity Main Access 

Road Maintenance Chip Seal; .65 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot State State High Maintenance $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Osborn Bay 

Campground Gravel 

Surfacing 

Rutting and undefined roadway 

and parking area; .1 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Low Maintenance $250,000 

Northup Point Chip 

Seal 

Large cracking and chip seal on .5 

miles of road 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Boat Ramp USBR State Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Prineville Resevoir 

North Primative 

Road 

Periodically evaluate road 

condition & harden crossings for 

emergency evac route. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Unity Access 

Maintenance; .25 

miles Fill cracks and chip seal 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Crown Point Trail 

Stabilize subsurface to protect 

trail; 5.5 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Not Applicable USBR State Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Banks Lake Boat 

Ramp Evaluation 

Evaluation and Condition 

Assessment for Banks Lake 

Boatramps and their access. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Boat Ramp Roadway USBR State High 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Osborn Bay Road planning 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Boat Ramp USBR State Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Prineville Reservoir -

South Shore - Cattle 

Exculs 

Find ways to exclude cattle from 

south shore but honor rts 

reserved to LO to water access 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Not Applicable USBR State Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Steamboat Rock Trail 

Planning and 

Upgrades 

Sections of the trail are steep with 

loose rock, new trails being 

developed by peds 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Not Applicable USBR State Medium 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Bully Creek Road 

Assessment and 

Agreement 

Inventory primitive routes and 

close unnecessary routes 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Agreement(s) $250,000 

Minidoka Dam Boat Ramp repair 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR USBR High Capital $250,000 

Mann Creek 

Reservoir East Boat Ramp Accessibility 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Bumping Lake Dam Bridge replacement 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway USBR USBR High Capital $250,000 

Tieton Dam 

13TIEDISC 

Bridge replacement/repair at 

Outlet* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR USBR High Capital $250,000 

Tieton Dam 

Bridge 13TIEWCAT- Repair or 

replace the bridge/abutments 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Mann Creek West 

Campground Parking 

Lot Improvement 

Regraded and re-surfaced to 

meet accessibility standards 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Boat Ramp USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Buelah Upgrades 

Parking Lot Repair and 

Accessibility Upgrades 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Boat Ramp USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Warm Springs 

Restroom Parking 

No Parking Area, Does not meet 

accessibility standards 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Summer Falls 

Pedestrian Trail 

Create access and parking near 

CXT; .1 miles of trail 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Trail USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Teton River Canyon 

Primitive Camp Area 

Resurface gravel road to 

infrastructure; 2 miles* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR High Capital $250,000 

Maintenance Access 

Evaluation and 

Upgrade 

Stabilize subsurface to prevent 

road slumping; .1 miles* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR High Capital $250,000 

American Falls West 

Wall Recreation Area 

Paving Road and Parking areas, 

and installing permanent 

restroom at West Wall Rec Area; 

.5 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Ririe Juniper 

Campground 

Improve 2.5 miles of Roadway, 

Lighting, and Accessibility for 

Juniper Campground; Combine w/ 

372 375 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Prineville Reservoir -

Bear Creek Road -

Vehicle C 

Close road to vehicle traffic --

improve it for pedestrian use as a 

hiking trail; 10 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Trail USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Juniper Ridge 

Subdivision Road 

Improve road to county standards 

and dedicate it to the county. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

American Falls 

Repave road and maintenance 

yard; .5 miles* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Scooteney Park 

Pedestrian Trail 

Repair .13 miles asphalt walking 

path at CG 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Not Applicable USBR USBR High Capital $250,000 

North Unit Main 

Canal Burma Road -

BLM Trail 

Evaluate, re-design, improve/build 

1 mile Burma Road trail. Install 

protections at tunnel entrance. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Scooteney Trails 

Design and maintain .5 miles of 

trail system 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Grand Coulee Dam 

Interpretative River 

Trail 

River Trail addition; Replace .5 

miles of degraded asphalt trail 

with concrete 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Parking Lot USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Lakeway Bridge 

Perform and post revised load 

rating. Adjust the downstream left 

object marker. Fill the void 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

Ephrata Field Office 

Parking Lot Resurface EFO parking lot 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Not Applicable USBR USBR High Maintenance $250,000 

Ephrata Field Office 

Warehouse Parking 

Lot 

Resurface EFO Warehouse parking 

lot* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Not Applicable USBR USBR High Maintenance $250,000 

Mann Creek South 

Day Use Upgrades Re-gravel parking lot and roads 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Parking Lot Roadway USBR USBR Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Anderson Ranch 

Dam Road 

Potholes and Alligator Cracking; 

.25 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR High Maintenance $250,000 

North Unit Ranch of 

the Canyons Canal 

Access Road 

Add fill to weatherize gravel 

roadbed next to river's edge. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

American Falls 

American Falls Visitor Center Road 

and Parking Lot; .1 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

Hagg Lake Private 

Access Easement -

Bean 

Repair blown culvert and hillside 

(.25 miles) erosion. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Culvert USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

Dry Falls Dam 

Maintenance Road 

Re-gravel 1.5 miles of 

Maintenance Access Road below 

Dry Falls Dam. Rec 2015-3-A.* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Thief Valley Dam 

Gravel access roadway across 

private ground to right abutment; 

1.3 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Summer Falls Access 

Road 

Crown, ditch and re-gravel .3 

miles of access road 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Culvert USBR USBR Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Banks Lake Park 

Chipseal Seal cracks and chip seal road 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Bridge #11 ELL0044 

Farm Bridge East Low Lateral 68 

Sta. 75+10 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable 

Water District 

or Water User 

Groups USBR Low Operations $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Buelah 

Transportation Plan 

Inventory existing primitive routes 

and close unnecessary routes; 

covers 25 miles 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Box Culvert Upgrade Widen Box Culvert* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Culvert Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Capital $250,000 

Ashland Lateral -

Access Road -

Drainage 

Improvement 

Reconstruct road to improve 

drainage during sheet flow rain 

events; .1 miles* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Capital $250,000 

Bridge #11 WC0150 

Bridge on the West Canal W26C 

Sta. 117+60 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Maintenance $250,000 

Bridge #11 PECL0083 

Bridge on Potholes East Canal 

16.4 Sta. 0136+88 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Bridge #11 MC0013 Moses Lake Spillway Bridge 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Ashland Lateral 

Diversion - Access 

Road - Drainage 

Reconstruct canal access road to 

improve drainage during sheet 

flow rain events; .25 miles* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Maintenance $250,000 

Ashland Lateral 

Diversion access road 

Restore eroded sections of access 

road to diversion dam; .25 miles* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Maintenance $250,000 

Ashland Lateral -

Urban Trail - Design 

and Build 

Bury lateral and build urban trail 

over pipe to create trail from city 

to Emigrant reservoir; 10 mil 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Maintenance $250,000 

Bridge #11 ELL0043 

Farm Bridge East Low Lateral 68 

Sta. 48+88 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Operations $250,000 

Bridge #11 WC0140 

Bridge on the West Canal W20F 

Sta. 221+75 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Operations $250,000 

Bridge #11 PECL0087 

Bridge on Potholes East Canal 

16.4M12WW Sta. 030+20 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Operations $250,000 

Bridge #11ELL0002 

Farm bridge East Low Lateral 20 

Sta. 058+70 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Operations $250,000 

Bridge#11 ELL0003 

Farm Bridge East Low Lateral 20 

Sta. 086+33 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Operations $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Bridge #11ELL0007 

Farm Bridge East Low Lateral 29 

Sta. 228+23 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Operations $250,000 

Bridge #11 ELL0090 

Farm Bridge on East Low Lateral 

36.3 Sta. 22+29 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Operations $250,000 

Bridge #11 ELL0099 

Farm bridge on East Low Lateral 

36.3 Sta. 29+26 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Operations $250,000 

Bridge #11 ELL209 

Bridge on East Low Lateral 29 Sta. 

603+62 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Operations $250,000 

Bridge # 11 ELL211 

Bridge on East Low Lateral 29 Sta. 

748+00 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Operations $250,000 

Bridge #11 PECL0064 

Bridge on Wahluke Branch 10 Sta. 

164+00 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Operations $250,000 

Bridge #11 PECL0077 

Bridge on Potholes East Canal 46A 

WW Sta. 251+00 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Operations $250,000 

Bridge #11 PECL0084 

Bridge on Potholes East Canal 

16.4 Sta. 0188+65 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Bridge # 11 PEC0037 

Bridge on Wahluke Branch Canal 

Sta. 1494+23 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Hagg Lake Mill Creek 

Drainage: Evaluate 

Relocation 

Evaluate need for flowage 

easement and alternatives for 

stormwater discharge over about 

1 mile. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Culvert Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Tualatin Project -

Buired Irrigation Pipe 

System -

Evaluate condition of all driveway 

crossings over buried irrigation 

pipes; 1 mile 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Culvert Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Ochoco - Service 

Roads - Cattle 

Exclusion - Design 

Find ways to exclude cattle from 

earthen canal service roads. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Hagg Lake/Scoggins 

Creek Trespass 

Access Road 

Survey .5 miles new residential 

access road wrt USA fee-owned 

land boundary. Investigate tree 

cutting. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Haystack Dam 

Tender's Driveway: 

Easement & Bridge 

Survey for easement acquisition. 

Bridge relocation* 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Bridge Low Agreement(s) $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Carey Foster Road 

Coordinate with city to 

decommission road and make it a 

ped trail. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Agreement(s) $250,000 

o 15NTS001: Notus 

Canal-Ditch Rider 

Access Bridge Install approach rail 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Bridge Capital $250,000 

Solar powered 

automated gates 

Find funding and authority to 

place gates on all intersections of 

canals and roads. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway Capital $250,000 

Potholes Hiking Trails 

upgraded 

Old two track used as trail, no 

maintenance or formal 

development 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Trail Capital $250,000 

BLM cattle grazing 

exclusionary 

improvements 

Study ways to prevent cattle in 

BLM grazing units from damaging 

canal lining and contaminating 

water 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Diversion Canal 

replacement - phase 

1 

Plan for replacing road after 

excavating the Diversion Canal 

pipe. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Diversion Canal 

replacement - phase 

2 

Plan for rebuilding Combs Flat 

Road after excavating Diversion 

Canal pipe for replacement. 

ColumbiaPacific 

Northwest Roadway 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Horseshoe Dam 

Install culvert structure on 

Horseshoe Dam Access Road to 

allow needed access during rain 

events 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Culvert Roadway Other Federal Other Federal Medium Capital $250,000 

Hoover Dam - Bldgs 

& Grounds 

Lower Portal Road bridge and 

slope repair 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Bridge Not Applicable USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Main Outlet Drain 

Bridge repair of Service Road, 

Figueroa, and N. 9th Avenue 

bridges 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Bridge Not Applicable USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Hoover Dam Region Transit feasibility study 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Transit System Roadway USBR USBR Medium 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Senator Wash Road 

& Squaw Lake Area 

Congestion Management Study 

for this Region 

Lower 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot Medium 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Silos road 

1-5 miles move, gravel or pave 

with FLTP 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR County Low Capital $250,000 

Angostura Shoreline 

stabilization project 

.1 miles road & bike path 

threatened by shoreline, bank 

stabilization will be needed 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Trail USBR State Medium Agreement(s) $250,000 

Shadehill Reservoir 

Road resurfacing and drainage 

improvements 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Culvert USBR State Low Capital $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

WMA east build up with gravel* 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Low Maintenance $250,000 

Duck Creek boat 

ramp 

build concrete boat ramp, 

possible FLTP project 

Missouri 

Basin Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Shannon boat launch extend into water 

Missouri 

Basin Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Jo Bonner boat ramp concrete 

Missouri 

Basin Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

New Johns Lake Boat 

Ramp medium 

Missouri 

Basin Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Crappie Creek Boat 

Ramp medium 

Missouri 

Basin Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Koehlers Point Boat 

Ramp medium 

Missouri 

Basin Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Chain of Lakes Boat 

Ramp medium 

Missouri 

Basin Boat Ramp Parking Lot USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Warehouse parking 

lot rehab with gravel or pave* 

Missouri 

Basin Parking Lot Roadway USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Crappie Creek 

Dumping Station high - heavy use area 

Missouri 

Basin Parking Lot USBR USBR Medium Capital $250,000 

Cave Point road rehab with gravel 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

East Shore North 

road millings or paving, possible FLAP 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Eagle Bay Drive 

1-5 miles rehab and gravel, 

possible FLAP 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Chinamen 

Campground road rehab with gravel or pave 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

White Earth roads 

Less than a mile build up with 

gravel, mag chloride, possible 

pave with FLTP 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Hellgate roads 

1-5 miles build up with gravel, 

mag chloride on main road, 

possibly pave main road 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

West Shore Drive 

road 

1-5 miles complete millings using 

FLAP 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Magpie Yard road rehab with gravel* 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Riverside boat ramp concrete repairs 

Missouri 

Basin Boat Ramp USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

Hellgate boat ramp 

east concrete repairs needed 

Missouri 

Basin Boat Ramp Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

Goose Bay roads 

south 

Less than a mile build up with 

gravel 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

Confederate 

secondary roads 

Less than a mile build up with 

gravel 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

Indian Road roads 

Less than a mile build up with 

gravel 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

Cottonwood road 1- 5 miles build up with gravel 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Duck Creek roads 

secondary 

Less than a mile build up with 

gravel 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

Overlook DUA road 

Less than a mile build up with 

gravel 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

Fish Hawk 

Campground road 

Less than a mile build up with 

gravel 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR USBR Low Maintenance $250,000 

HRVV main road 

Less than a mile Rehab road with 

gravel or pave, possible FLAP 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Capital $250,000 

HVRR road 

1-5 miles rehab with gravel, 

possible FLAP 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Capital $250,000 

Crow Creek roads gravel and build up 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable 

Water District 

or Water User 

Groups 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Maintenance $250,000 

Tiber Marina Boat Ramp Extension 

Missouri 

Basin Boat Ramp Capital $250,000 

Yellowtail Dam 

Access Rd Rock scaling 

Missouri 

Basin Roadway Maintenance $250,000 

Pathfinder 

Interpretive Trail 

Resurfacing trail & meet ABA 

accessibility on swinging bridge 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Trail Bridge USBR County Medium Capital $250,000 

Ridges Basin Dam 

Tribute Garden Rd paving; 

resurface and repair 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Parking Lot Roadway USBR 

Local 

Entity(Town, City, 

Public Works, 

etc.) Low Capital $250,000 

Bull Lake Access 

Road Road repairs and resurfacing 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Other Federal Other Federal Low Capital $250,000 

Rifle Gap Beach Road 

Drainage Improvements, gravel 

resrufacing, earthworkm and 

riprap bank stabil. on Rifle Gap 

Beach Rd. 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Low Capital $250,000 

Rifle Gap Entrance 

Road 

Study and Repair Subsidence 

issues on Rifel Gap Entrance Road 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Medium Capital $250,000 

Rifle Gap Pavement 

Maintenance 

Chip seal all paved surface in Rifle 

Gap park 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Low Maintenance $250,000 

Wind River 

Campground Road Erosion repairs & resurfacing 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR State Medium Maintenance $250,000 

Chama River 

Staircase & Trail 

Remove portions of structurally 

unsound staircase at the Rio 

Chama trailhead and repair 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Trail Trail USBR State Low Maintenance $250,000 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Project Name B. Need Description C. Region 

D. Primary 

Asset Type 

E. Secondary Asset 

Type 

F. Facility 

Ownership 

G. Facility 

Operation & 

Maintenance 

H. Region 

Priority I. Improvement Type 

J. Estimated 

Median Cost for 

Improvement 

Navajo Lake State 

Park (NM) Access 

Management Plan 

Parking needs are primary; 

examine where to locate 

houseboat; manage growth; 

expand, etc. 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway USBR State Medium 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Navajo State Park 

(CO) Traffic Studies 

Traffic and road safety studies on 

road in and accessing Navajo 

State Park 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway USBR State Medium 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Vallecito Lake Visitor 

Use and 

Transportation Plan 

Visitor Use and Transportation 

Access Plan; include/address 

resource concerns through effort 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Parking Lot USBR State Medium 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study $250,000 

Anchor Reservoir 

Access Road 

Rebuild access road damaged by 

high water 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway USBR USBR Low Capital $250,000 

Resurface Boat Ramp 

Parking at Vallecito 

83000 sq feetchip seal or asphalt 

existing gravel parking lot and 

add AIS decontamination area 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Parking Lot Parking Lot USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Capital $250,000 

Vallecito Extra 

Parking; 5-10 space 

lots; 2 lots 

add two small parking lots near 

low water locations 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Parking Lot Parking Lot USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Medium Capital $250,000 

Ridges Basin Dam Rehab Dam Access* 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Not Applicable USBR 

Water District or 

Water User 

Groups Low Capital $250,000 

Alcova Dam Spillway Spillway and bridge repair 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Bridge Capital $250,000 

Seminoe Dam Access 

Rd Repair and rock abatement 

Upper 

Colorado 

Basin Roadway Maintenance $250,000 

South Dam Boat 

Ramp Parking Overlay Asphalt 

Arkansas-Rio 

GrandeTexas Gulf Parking Lot Not Applicable USBR State High Capital $250,000 
 

 

 

Tables 2-11 summarize the number of needs entered by the field of information a Region provided on each need. In the parentheses of each table name is the corresponding Question/Field the Region was answering 

from the user guide in Appendix A. 

Table 2. Summary of Needs Entered by DOI Regions (A.1. Location of Need) Table 3. Summary of Needs Entered by Ownership and Operation and Maintenance of the 

Facility the need is located on. (B.3. Agency with Ownership; B.4 Agency with O&M) 

DOI Unified Region Name (Region #) 

# of Needs 

Entered 

Percentage of All Needs 

Entered 

Arkansas-Rio Grande-Texas Gulf 

(Region 6) 18 5% 

California-Great Basin 

(Region 10) 59 17% 

Columbia-Pacific Northwest (Region 9) 164 46% 

Lower Colorado Basin 

(Region 8) 17 5% 

Missouri Basin 

(Region 5) 45 13% 

Upper Colorado Basin 

(Region 7) 51 14% 

Total 354 100% 

Ownership of Facility # of Needs Entered 

County 12 

Local Entity (Town, City, Public Works, etc.) 3 

Other Federal 11 

State 16 

Reclamation 279 

Water District or Water User Groups 2 

Total 323 

Operations & Maintenance of Facility # of Needs Entered 

County 31 

Local Entity (Town, City, Public Works, etc.) 8 

Other Federal 14 

Other Governmental Entity (MPO, COG, Regional Councils, 

etc.) 1 

State 95 

Reclamation 127 

Water District or Water User Groups 49 

Total 325 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 7. Summary of Needs by Turn Back Risk Table 4. Summary of Needs Entered Region Determined Priority (SP.5. What is the risk of Turn Back?) (C.1. Priority of the Need Relative to Your Region) 

Priority of Need # of Needs Entered Percentage of Needs 

High 59 18% 

Low 153 47% 

Medium 115 35% 

Total 327 100% 

Turn Back Risk # of Needs Entered Percentage of All Needs 

High 9 3% 

Low 99 32% 

Medium 26 8% 

Not Applicable 173 56% 

Total 307 100% 

Table 5. Summary of Needs Entered by Assumed Project Type (D.1. Proposed Improvement) 

Table 8. Summary of Needs Safety Risk Associated with the Need 

(S.2. How big is the safety risk?) 

Type of Project # of Needs Entered Percentage of Needs 

Agreement(s) 6 2% 

Capital 226 64% 

Maintenance 82 23% 

Operations 14 4% 

Planning 

Study/RSA/PEL/Corridor 

Study 26 7% 

Total 354 100% 

Safety Risk # of Needs Entered Percentage of All Needs 

High 41 13% 

Low 124 40% 

Medium 102 33% 

Not Applicable 45 14% 

Total 312 100% 

Table 6. Summary of Needs by Existing Condition of the Facility 

(SP.1. What best describes the existing condition of the asset associated to the need?) Table 9. Summary of Needs by Turn Back Risk 

(S.1. What type of user does the Safety concern primarily relate to?) 

Condition of Facility Need 

is Located On # of Needs Entered Percentage of All Needs 

Failed - does not 

meet intended use 41 14% 

Poor - will fail with 

no action 90 31% 

Fair - sustainable through 

maintenance/ operations 144 50% 

Good 14 5% 

Total 289 100% 

Type of Safety Concern # of Needs Entered Percentage of All Needs 

ABA/ADA Accessibility 17 5% 

Bicycle 6 2% 

Hazard 19 6% 

Not Applicable 40 13% 

Pedestrian 19 6% 

Vehicle 211 68% 

Total 312 100% 
 

 

 

Table 10. Summary of Needs the Primary Type of Site the Asset with the Need Accesses 

(RE.1. What type of site(s) does the asset access?) 

NOTE: Regions had to choose one but verbally reported they saw several needs as falling 

both in the Recreation and Economic Generator categories. Further scoping will be 

needed to determine if the need is serving public access or just access for other forms of 

economic generation. Subsequent deployments of the Needs Assessment may want to 

ask more specifically if the need is located on a facility serving public access and how 

much. This will help determine what kind of funding to pursue for the project. 

Site Type # of Needs Entered Percentage of All Needs 

Recreation site (trailhead, 

camping site, overlook, 

picnic, boating area, etc.) 218 69% 

Administrative Use Only 26 8% 

Economic generator 

(power, M&I water, 

farming / ranching, etc.) 52 17% 

Other or Undetermined 16 5% 

Not Applicable 2 1% 

Total 314 100% 

Table 11. Summary of Needs Observed Visitation level at the Site the Need is Located 

(RE. 4. What is the level of visitation at the site?) 

Level of Observed 

Visitation # of Needs Entered Percentage of All Needs 

High (at or overcapacity) 81 26% 

Low (underutilized) 78 25% 

Medium (near capacity) 96 31% 

Not Applicable 53 17% 

Total 308 100% 
 

 

 

 

 

n 18 n 354 n 18

Appendix C. Arkansas-Rio Grande-Texas Gulf 2018-2019 

Transportation Needs Assessment Summary 

National Summary of Results 

REGION TOTAL NEEDS IDENTIFIED

Arkansas-Rio GrandeTexas Gulf 18 

California-Great Basin 59 

Columbia-Pacific 

Northwest 164 

Lower Colorado Basin 17 

Missouri Basin 45 

Upper Colorado Basin 31 

TOTAL 354

The following tables summarize details about the needs entered as they relate to the region, and also 

compared to the Reclamation-wide summary. When a table states “Breakdown by Region,” it is referring 

to the percentage based on all needs entered in that region. When a table states “Breakdown Across All 

Regions,” it is showing how that same need category or element brokedown when looking at all 354 

needs entered. Similarly, when a graph just includes the region name in the title, it is only looking at how 

that need category distributed amongst all that region’s needs. When “All Reclamation Regions” is in the 

title, it is looking at how that need category distributed based on all needs entered. 

Priority of Need and Cost

The Arkansas-Rio Grande-Texas Gulf Region identified 18 needs, for a total estimated median cost of 

$11.8 million. The majority of needs were assessed to be high priority and estimated to cost less than 

$500,000 for each need. 

A-RG-TG - Priority of Need All Reclamation Regions -

Priority of Need 

72%

High Medium N/A

22%

6%

=

17%

32%

43%

8%

High Medium Low N/A

= = n= 18 n= 354
 

Priority of the Need (n=18) 

Estimated Cost Range High Medium Low 

Priority 

Not 

Identified 

Less than $500K 11 2 1 

$500K-$1 Million 1 

$1-$5 Million 2 1 

Greater than $5 Million 

Project and Asset Type of Needs

One hundred percent of the needs identified in the Arkansas-Rio Grande-Texas Gulf Region were 

assessed to be capital improvements. Across all Reclamation regions, only 64% of the needs were 

assessed to be capital improvements. Similar to all Reclamation regions, the Arkansas-Rio Grande-Texas 

Gulf Region identified most of its needs to be either on roadways or parking lots. 

Improvement Type 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=18) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

Capital 18 100% 64% 

Maintenance 0 0% 23% 

Agreement 0 0% 2% 

Operations 0 0% 4% 

Planning 0 0% 7% 

Project Type 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=18) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

Boat Ramp 0 0% 7% 

Bridge 1 6% 12% 

Culvert 0 0% 2% 

Parking Lot 7 39% 17% 

Roadway 10 56% 55% 

Trail 0 0% 6% 

Transit System 0 0% 0% 
 

 

 

Facility Condition of Needs

The Arkansas-Rio Grande-Texas Gulf Region assessed that all the facilities their needs were located on 

were in poor condition, or that they will fail with no improvements. Seventeen, or 94% of the 18 needs, 

were assessed to be on sites with high or medium turn back risk. Across all Reclamation regions, only 31% 

of all needs were identified to be at sites with high or medium turn back risk, but many regions also did 

not answer this question. 

Turn Back Risk 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=18) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

High 3 16% 3% 

Medium 14 78% 28% 

Low 0 0% 7% 

Not Applicable or Blank 1 6% 62% 

Safety Risk Associated with Needs

The Arkansas-Rio Grande-Texas Gulf Region assessed most of their needs to have a medium safety risk, 

related to vehicle access. Across all Reclamation regions, almost two-thirds of the needs were assessed to 

have a medium or low safety risk. 

A-RG-TG - Safety Risk All Reclamation Regions - Safety 

Associated with Need Risk Associated with Need 

17%

78%

6% 12%

29%

35%

25%

n= 18 n= 354

High Medium Low Not Applicable or Blank High Medium Low Not Applicable or Blank
Visitation Levels at Sites Associated with Needs

The Arkansas-Rio Grande-Texas Gulf Region assessed 94% of their needs to be at sites that were 

experiencing visitation levels at or over capacity. Across all Reclamation regions, needs were fairly 

well dispersed amongst sites experiencing high, medium, and low visitation levels. 

Visitation Levels at Sites 

Associated with Need 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=18) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

High (at or over capacity) 17 94% 23% 

Medium (near capacity) 0 0% 27% 

Low (underutilized) 0 0% 22% 

Not Applicable or Blank 1 6% 28% 

Location of Needs

The next page includes a map of the location of the needs in the Arkansas-Rio Grande-Texas Gulf Region. 

All needs identified were at Reclamation sites in Oklahoma. 
Needs by Region

Arkansas-Rio Grande-Texas Gulf
 

 

 

 

Appendix D. California-Great Basin 2018-2019 Transportation 

Needs Assessment Summary 

National Summary of Results 

REGION TOTAL NEEDS IDENTIFIED

Arkansas-Rio GrandeTexas Gulf 18 

California-Great Basin 59 

Columbia-Pacific 

Northwest 164 

Lower Colorado Basin 17 

Missouri Basin 45 

Upper Colorado Basin 31 

TOTAL 354

The following tables summarize details about the needs entered as they relate to the region, and also 

compared to the Reclamation-wide summary. When a table states “Breakdown by Region,” it is refering 

to the percentage based on all needs entered in that region. When a table states “Breakdown Across All 

Regions,” it is showing how that same need category or element brokedown when looking at all 354 

needs entered. Similarly, when a graph just includes the region name in the title, it is only looking at how 

that need category distributed amongst all that region’s needs. When “All Reclamation Regions” is in the 

title, it is looking at how that need category distributed based on all needs entered. 

Priority of Need and Cost

The California-Great Basin Region identified 59 needs, for a total estimated median cost of $57.5 million. 

The majority of needs were assessed to be medium or low priority and estimated to cost less than 

$1,000,0000 for each need. 

California-GB - Priority All Reclamation Regions -

Priority of Need 

10%

27%

17% 17%

32%

43%

8%

n= 59 n= 354

High Medium Low N/A

46%

High Medium Low N/A
 

Priority of the Need (n=59) 

Estimated Cost Range High Medium Low N/A 

Less than $500K 3 2 8 6 

$500K-$1 Million 1 11 14 3 

$1-$5 Million 2 2 5 1 

Greater than $5 Million 1 

Project and Asset Type of Needs

Sixty-nine percent of the needs identified in the California-Great Basin Region were assessed to be capital 

improvements. Across all Reclamation regions, only 64% of the needs were assessed to be capital 

improvements. Similar to all Reclamation regions, the California-Great Basin Region identified most (83%) 

of its needs to be either on roadways or parking lots. 

Improvement Type 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions 

Capital 41 69% 64% 

Maintenance 18 31% 23% 

Agreement 0 0% 2% 

Operations 0 0% 4% 

Planning 0 0% 7% 

Project Type 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions 

Boat Ramp 2 5% 7% 

Bridge 3 7% 12% 

Culvert 0 0% 2% 

Parking Lot 16 39% 17% 

Roadway 18 44% 55% 

Trail 2 5% 6% 

Transit System 0 0% 0% 
 

 

Facility Condition of Needs

The California-Great Basin Region assessed that just under half of the facilities their needs were located 

on were in poor or failing condition, or that they will fail with no improvements. Two, or 4% of the 59 

needs, were assessed to be on sites with high or medium turn back risk. Across all Reclamation regions, 

31% of all needs were identified to be at sites with high or medium turn back risk, but many regions 

also did not answer this question. 

Turn Back Risk 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=59) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

High 0 0% 3% 

Medium 2 4% 28% 

Low 33 56% 7% 

Not Applicable or Blank 24 40% 62% 

Safety Risk Associated with Needs

The California-Great Basin Region assessed most of their needs to have a low safety risk, related to 

vehicle access. Across all Reclamation regions, almost two-thirds of the needs were assessed to 

have a medium or low safety risk. 

California-GB - Safety Risk All Reclamation Regions -

Associated with Need Safety Risk Associated with 

2% Need 

6%

33%

59%

n= 59

12%

29%

35%

25%

n= 354

High Medium Low Not Applicable or Blank High Medium Low Not Applicable or Blank
Visitation Levels at Sites Associated with Needs

The California-Great Basin Region assessed 19% of their needs to be at sites that were experiencing 

visitation levels at or over capacity. Across all Reclamation regions, needs were fairly well dispersed 

amongst sites experiencing high, medium, and low visitation levels. 

Visitation Levels at Sites 

Associated with Need 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=59) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

High (at or over capacity) 11 19% 23% 

Medium (near capacity) 22 37% 27% 

Low (underutilized) 16 27% 22% 

Not Applicable or Blank 2 4% 28% 

Location of Needs

The next page includes a map of the location of the needs in the California-Great Basin Region. The 

majority of needs identified were at Reclamation sites in California. 
Needs by Region

California-Great Basin
 

 

 

 

 

Appendix E. Columbia-Pacific Northwest Region 2018-2019 

Transportation Needs Assessment Summary 

National Summary of Results 

REGION TOTAL NEEDS IDENTIFIED

Arkansas-Rio GrandeTexas Gulf 18 

California-Great Basin 59 

Columbia-Pacific 

Northwest 164 

Lower Colorado Basin 17 

Missouri Basin 45 

Upper Colorado Basin 31 

TOTAL 354

The following tables summarize details about the needs entered as they relate to the region, and also 

compared to the Reclamation-wide summary. When a table states “Breakdown by Region,” it is referring 

to the percentage based on all needs entered in that region. When a table states “Breakdown Across All 

Regions,” it is showing how that same need category or element brokedown when looking at all 354 

needs entered. Similarly, when a graph just includes the region name in the title, it is only looking at how 

that need category distributed amongst all that region’s needs. When “All Reclamation Regions” is in the 

title, it is looking at how that need category distributed based on all needs entered. 

Priority of Need and Cost

The Columbia-Pacific Northwest Region identified 164 needs, for a total estimated median cost of $111 

million. The majority of needs were assessed to be medium or low priority and estimated to cost less 

than $1 million for each need. 

All Reclamation Regions - C-PNW - Priority of Need 

21%

30%

41%

7%

Priority of Need 

n= 164

17%

32%

43%

8%

n= 354

High Medium Low N/A High Medium Low N/A
 

 

Priority of the Need (n=164) 

Estimated Cost Range High Medium Low 

Priority 

Not 

Identified 

Less than $500K 18 39 44 7 

$500K-$1 Million 10 8 19 1 

$1-$5 Million 5 3 4 3 

Greater than $5 Million 2 0 1 0 

Project and Asset Type of Needs

Seventy-five percent of the needs identified in the Columbia-Pacific Northwest Region were assessed to 

be capital or maintenance improvements. Across all Reclamation regions, 87% of the needs were assessed 

to be capital or maintenance improvements. The Columbia-Pacific Northwest Region also identified 

almost twice as many planning needs as compared to the Reclamation-wide breakdown. 

Similar to the Reclamation-wide summary, the Columbia-Pacific Northwest Region identified the majority 

of its needs to be on roadways and parking lots. However, it was only 60% of the region’s need, 

compared to 72% across all regions. The Columbia-Pacific Northwest Region saw more diversity in need 

project type, identifying twice as many trail needs compared to what was identified at a national level, 

and several more bridge needs than the rest of the regions. 

Improvement Type 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=164) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

Capital 84 51% 64% 

Maintenance 40 24% 23% 

Agreement 5 3% 2% 

Operations 14 9% 4% 

Planning 21 13% 7% 
 

 

Project Type 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=164) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

Boat Ramp 8 5% 7% 

Bridge 33 20% 12% 

Culvert 6 4% 2% 

Parking Lot 13 8% 17% 

Roadway 86 52% 55% 

Trail 18 11% 6% 

Transit System 0 0% 0% 

Facility Condition of Needs

The Columbia-Pacific Northwest Region assessed that about half of their needs were on facilities in fair or 

better condition. Another 34% were assessed to be on facilities in poor or failing condition. Seven, or 5% 

of the 164 needs, were assessed to be on sites with high or medium turn back risk, but the region did not 

answer this question for the majority of their needs. Across all Reclamation regions, 31% of all needs were 

identified to be at sites with high or medium turn back risk, but many regions also did not answer this 

question. 

Facility Condition 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=164) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

Failed - Does not meet 

intended use 26 16% 12% 

Poor - Will fail with no 

action 30 18% 25% 

Fair - Sustainable through 

maintenance/operations 77 47% 41% 

Good 3 2% 4% 

Not Applicable or Blank 28 17% 18% 

Turn Back Risk 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=164) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

High 1 Less than 1% 3% 

Medium 6 4% 28% 

Low 39 24% 7% 

Not Applicable or Blank 118 72% 62% 
 

 

 

 

 

Safety Risk Associated with Needs

The Columbia-Pacific Northwest Region assessed most of their needs to have a medium or low safety 

risk, mostly related to vehicle access. Across all Reclamation regions, almost two-thirds of the needs were 

assessed to have a medium or low safety risk. 

C-PNW - Safety Risk Associated All Reclamation Regions - Safety 

with Need Risk Associated with Need 

18%

30%

32%

20%

n= 164

12%

29%

35%

25%

n=354

High Medium Low Not Applicable or Blank High Medium Low Not Applicable or Blank

Visitation Levels at Sites Associated with Needs

The Columbia-Pacific Northwest Region needs were fairly evenly spread across sites that were 

experiencing varying visitation levels. This was in line with what was reported across all Reclamation 

regions. 

Visitation Levels at Sites 

Associated with Need 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=164) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

High (at or over capacity) 34 21% 23% 

Medium (near capacity) 45 27% 27% 

Low (underutilized) 35 21% 22% 

Not Applicable or Blank 50 31% 28% 

Location of Needs

The next page includes a map of the location of the needs in the Columbia-Pacific Northwest Region. 
Needs by Region

Columbia-Pacific Northwest
 

 

 

Appendix F. Lower Colorado Basin 2018-2019 Transportation 

Needs Assessment Summary 

National Summary of Results 

REGION TOTAL NEEDS IDENTIFIED

Arkansas-Rio GrandeTexas Gulf 18 

California-Great Basin 59 

Columbia-Pacific 

Northwest 164 

Lower Colorado Basin 17 

Missouri Basin 45 

Upper Colorado Basin 31 

TOTAL 354

The following tables summarize details about the needs entered as they relate to the region, and also 

compared to the Reclamation-wide summary. When a table states “Breakdown by Region,” it is referring 

to the percentage based on all needs entered in that region. When a table states "Breakdown Across All 

Regions,” it is showing how that same need category or element brokedown when looking at all 354 

needs entered. Similarly, when a graph just includes the region name in the title, it is only looking at how 

that need category distributed amongst all that region’s needs. When “All Reclamation Regions” is in the 

title, it is looking at how that need category distributed based on all needs entered. 

Priority of Need and Cost

The Lower Colorado Basin Region identified 17 needs, for a total estimated median cost of $31.5 million. 

The majority of needs were assessed to be medium or low priority and estimated to cost less than 

$1,000,0000 for each need. 

All Reclamation Regions - LC Basin - Priority 

59%

41%

n= 17

Priority of Need 

n= 354

17%

32% 43%

8%

High Medium Low N/A High Medium Low N/A
 

 

 

Priority of the Need (n=17) 

Estimated Cost Range High Medium Low N/A 

Less than $500K 0 5 0 0 

$500K-$1 Million 0 1 3 0 

$1-$5 Million 0 4 2 0 

Greater than $5 Million 0 0 2 0 

Project and Asset Type of Needs

Seventy-one percent of the needs identified in the Lower Colorado Basin Region were assessed to be 

capital improvements. Across all Reclamation regions, 64% of the needs were assessed to be capital 

improvements. Similar to all Reclamation regions, the Lower Colorado Basin Region identified most (67%) 

of its needs to be either on roadways or parking lots. 

Improvement Type 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions 

Capital 12 71% 64% 

Maintenance 3 18% 23% 

Agreement 0 0% 2% 

Operations 0 0% 4% 

Planning 2 12% 7% 

Project Type 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions 

Boat Ramp 0 0% 7% 

Bridge 2 17% 12% 

Culvert 1 8% 2% 

Parking Lot 0 0% 17% 

Roadway 8 67% 55% 

Trail 0 0% 6% 

Transit System 1 8% 0% 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Facility Condition of Needs 

The Lower Colorado Basin Region assessed that 59% of the facilities their needs were located on were in 

poor or failing condition, or that they will fail with no improvements. None of their needs were at sites 

with high or medium turn back risk. Across all Reclamation regions, 31% of all needs were identified to be 

at sites with high or medium turn back risk, but many regions also did not answer this question. 

Turn Back Risk

# Needs

Entered for

the Region

Breakdown by

Region (n=59)

Breakdown Across

All Reclamation

Regions (n=354)

High 0 0% 3% 

Medium 0 0% 28% 

Low 1 6% 7% 

Not Applicable or Blank 16 94% 62% 

Safety Risk Associated with Needs 

The Lower Colorado Basin Region assessed most of their needs to have a medium or low safety risk, 

related to vehicle access. Across all Reclamation regions, almost two-thirds of the needs were assessed 

to have a medium or low safety risk. 

Lower Colorado - Safety All Reclamation Regions - Safety 

Risk Associated with Need Risk Associated with Need

12%

29%

35%

25%

n= 354 

6%

41%

35%

18%

n=17 

High Medium Low Not Applicable or Blank High Medium Low Not Applicable or Blank
 

Visitation Levels at Sites Associated with Needs 

The Lower Colorado Basin Region assessed 19% of their needs to be at sites that were experiencing 

visitation levels at or over capacity. Across all Reclamation regions, needs were fairly well dispersed 

amongst sites experiencing high, medium, and low visitation levels. 

Visitation Levels at Sites 

Associated with Need 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=17) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

High (at or over capacity) 1 6% 23% 

Medium (near capacity) 7 42% 27% 

Low (underutilized) 1 6% 22% 

Not Applicable or Blank 8 47% 28% 

Location of Needs 

The next page includes a map of the location of the needs in the Lower Colorado Basin Region. 

 

 

 

 

Appendix G. Missouri Basin 2018-2019 Transportation Needs 

Assessment Summary 

National Summary of Results 

REGION TOTAL NEEDS IDENTIFIED

Arkansas-Rio GrandeTexas Gulf 18 

California-Great Basin 59 

Columbia-Pacific 

Northwest 164 

Lower Colorado Basin 17 

Missouri Basin 45 

Upper Colorado Basin 31 

TOTAL 354

The following tables summarize details about the needs entered as they relate to the region, and also 

compared to the Reclamation-wide summary. When a table states “Breakdown by Region,” it is referring 

to the percentage based on all needs entered in that region. When a table states ”Breakdown Across All 

Regions,” it is showing how that same need category or element brokedown when looking at all 354 

needs entered. Similarly, when a graph just includes the region name in the title, it is only looking at how 

that need category distributed amongst all that region’s needs. When “All Reclamation Regions” is in the 

title, it is looking at how that need category distributed based on all needs entered. 

Priority of Need and Cost 

The Missouri Basin Region identified 45 needs, for a total estimated median cost of $25 million. The 

majority of needs were assessed to be low priority and estimated to cost less than $1,000,0000 for each 

need. 

Missouri Basin All Reclamation Regions - - Priority 

4% Priority of Need 

n= 354

17%

32% 43%

8%

High Medium Low N/A

7%

18%

71%

n=45

High Medium Low N/A
 

 

 

 

Priority of the Need (n=45) 

Estimated Cost Range High Medium Low N/A 

Less than $500K 0 6 29 0 

$500K-$1 Million 2 2 3 0 

$1-$5 Million 0 0 2 0 

Greater than $5 Million 1 0 0 0 

Project and Asset Type of Needs

Sixty-four percent of the needs identified in the Missouri Basin Region were assessed to be capital 

improvements. This is identical to the national percentage of needs assessed to be capital improvements. 

Similar to all Reclamation regions, the Missouri Basin Region identified most (69%) of its needs to be 

either on roadways or parking lots. 

Improvement Type 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions 

Capital 29 64% 64% 

Maintenance 15 33% 23% 

Agreement 1 2% 2% 

Operations 0 0% 4% 

Planning 0 0% 7% 

Project Type 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions 

Boat Ramp 8 28% 7% 

Bridge 1 3% 12% 

Culvert 0 0% 2% 

Parking Lot 2 7% 17% 

Roadway 18 62% 55% 

Trail 0 0% 6% 

Transit System 0 0% 0% 
 

 

 

 

 

Facility Condition of Needs

The Missouri Basin Region assessed that all the facilities their needs were located on were in poor 

condition, or that they will fail with no improvements. Nine, or 4% of the 45 needs, were assessed to be 

on sites with high or medium turn back risk. Across all Reclamation regions, 31% of all needs were 

identified to be at sites with high or medium turn back risk, but many regions also did not answer this 

question. 

Turn Back Risk 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=45) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

High 1 0% 3% 

Medium 8 4% 28% 

Low 7 56% 7% 

Not Applicable or Blank 29 40% 62% 

Safety Risk Associated with Needs

The Missouri Basin Region assessed most of their needs to have a medium safety risk, related to vehicle 

access. Across all Reclamation regions, almost two-thirds of the needs were assessed to have a medium 

or low safety risk. 

Missouri Basin All Reclamation Regions - - Safety Risk 

Associated with Need Safety Risk Associated with 

Need 2%

13%

56%

29%

n=45

12%

29%

35%

25%

n= 354

High Medium Low Not Applicable or Blank High Medium Low Not Applicable or Blank
 

 

Visitation Levels at Sites Associated with Needs

The Missouri Basin Region assessed 20% of their needs to be at sites that were experiencing visitation 

levels at or over capacity. Across all Reclamation regions, needs were fairly well dispersed amongst 

sites experiencing high, medium, and low visitation levels. 

Visitation Levels at Sites 

Associated with Need 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=45) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

High (at or over capacity) 9 20% 23% 

Medium (near capacity) 14 31% 27% 

Low (underutilized) 16 36% 22% 

Not Applicable or Blank 6 13% 28% 

Location of Needs

The next page includes a map of the location of the needs in the Missouri Basin Region. 

 

 

 

 

Appendix H. Upper Colorado Basin 2018-2019 Transportation

Needs Assessment Summary

National Summary of Results 

REGION TOTAL NEEDS IDENTIFIED

Arkansas-Rio GrandeTexas Gulf 18 

California-Great Basin 59 

Columbia-Pacific 

Northwest 164 

Lower Colorado Basin 17 

Missouri Basin 45 

Upper Colorado Basin 51 

TOTAL 354

The following tables summarize details about the needs entered as they relate to the region, and also 

compared to the Reclamation-wide summary. When a table states “Breakdown by Region,” it is referring 

to the percentage based on all needs entered in that region. When a table states “Breakdown Across All 

Regions,” it is showing how that same need category or element brokedown when looking at all 354 

needs entered. Similarly, when a graph just includes the region name in the title, it is only looking at how 

that need category distributed amongst all that region’s needs. When “All Reclamation Regions” is in the 

title, it is looking at how that need category distributed based on all needs entered. 

Priority of Need and Cost

The Upper Colorado Basin Region identified 51 needs, for a total estimated median cost of $73.5 million. 

The majority of needs were assessed to be medium or low priority and estimated costs vary across all 

cost range categories. 

UC Basin All Reclamation Regions - - Priority

4% Priority of Need

n= 354

17%

32% 43%

8%

High Medium Low N/A

53%

37%

6%

n= 51

High Medium Low N/A
 

 

Priority of the Need (n=51) 

Estimated Cost Range High Medium Low N/A 

Less than $500K 0 7 10 0 

$500K-$1 Million 0 4 7 0 

$1-$5 Million 1 16 5 0 

Greater than $5 Million 1 0 0 0 

Project and Asset Type of Needs

Eighty-one percent of the needs identified in the Upper Colorado Basin Region were assessed to be 

capital improvements. Across all Reclamation regions, 64% of the needs were assessed to be capital 

improvements. Similar to all Reclamation regions, the Upper Colorado Basin Region identified most (65%) 

of its needs to be either on roadways or parking lots. 

Improvement Type 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions 

Capital 42 83% 64% 

Maintenance 6 12% 23% 

Agreement 0 0% 2% 

Operations 0 0% 4% 

Planning 3 5% 7% 

Project Type 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions 

Boat Ramp 0 0% 7% 

Bridge 8 16% 12% 

Culvert 0 0% 2% 

Parking Lot 4 8% 17% 

Roadway 37 73% 55% 

Trail 2 2% 6% 

Transit System 0 0% 0% 
 

 

 

Facility Condition of Needs 

The Upper Colorado Basin Region assessed that about a third of the facilities their needs were located on 

were in poor or failing condition, or that they will fail with no improvements. Only two of their needs were 

at sites with high or medium turn back risk. Across all Reclamation regions, 31% of all needs were 

identified to be at sites with high or medium turn back risk, but many regions also did not answer this 

question. 

Turn Back Risk 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=59) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

High 1 2% 3% 

Medium 1 4% 28% 

Low 19 37% 7% 

Not Applicable or Blank 30 59% 62% 

Safety Risk Associated with Needs

The Upper Colorado Basin Region did not have an assessment of the safety risk associated with their 

needs for most of their entries. Across all Reclamation regions, almost two-thirds of the needs were 

assessed to have a medium or low safety risk. 

All Reclamation Regions -

UC Basin- Safety Risk Safety Risk Associated with 

Associated with Need Need 

8%

16%

22%

55%

n=51

High Medium Low Not Applicable or Blank

12%

29%

35%

25%

n= 354

High Medium Low Not Applicable or Blank
 

 

Visitation Levels at Sites Associated with Needs

The Upper Colorado Basin Region assessed 18% of their needs to be at sites that were 

experiencing visitation levels at or over capacity. Across all Reclamation regions, needs were 

fairly well dispersed amongst sites experiencing high, medium, and low visitation levels. 

Visitation Levels at Sites 

Associated with Need 

# Needs 

Entered for 

the Region 

Breakdown by 

Region (n=17) 

Breakdown Across 

All Reclamation 

Regions (n=354) 

High (at or over capacity) 9 18% 23% 

Medium (near capacity) 8 16% 27% 

Low (underutilized) 10 19% 22% 

Not Applicable or Blank 24 47% 28% 

Location of Needs

The next page includes a map of the location of the needs in the Upper Colorado Basin Region. 

APPENDIX I. List of Federal Lands Access Program Projects Accessing Reclamation Lands 

State Project Name - Description Delivery Agency Applicant Improvement type Reclamation Land(s) 

Accessed 

Selected by Programming 

Decision Committee (Year) 

Delivery 

Year 

FLAP Funds Requested 

(Rounded) 

Total Project Costs 

(Rounded) 

Arizona CATTAIL COVE 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA AZ State Parks 4R-Reconstruction-Relocation 

Lower Colorado Region - Lake 

Havasu 2016 2019 $4.3 Million $5.0 Million 

California BERRYESSA KNOXVILLE ROAD 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Napa County 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing Central California Area Office 2013 2018 $5.7 Million $7.0 Million 

California JOHNNY CASH TRAIL PHASE 2 City of Folsom City of Folsom Trail Mid Pacific Region 2013 2014 $872 Thousand $2.0 Million 

California OAK PARKWAY TRAIL UNDERPASS City of Folsom City of Folsom Trail Folsom Lake 2018 2021 $1.1 Million $2.1 Million 

Colorado HORSETOOTH RES AND CARTER LAKE 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Larimer County 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing 

Horsetooth Reservoir and Carter 

Lake 2020 2023 $9.0 Million $12.0 Million 

Colorado LAKE NIGHTHORSE ACCESS 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA City of Durango 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing Lake Nighthorse 2020 2024 $3.8 Million $5.0 Million 

Colorado 

LAKE PUEBLO ROAD & TRAIL 

IMPROVEMENTS 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA State of Colorado Trail Lake Pueblo State Park 2013 2015 $8.2 Million $10.8 Million 

Colorado NICHOLS ROAD 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Pueblo West Metro 4R-Reconstruction-Relocation Pueblo Reservoir 2016 2022 $1.8 Million $2.1 Million 

Idaho MARINA ROAD; SH-39 TO PACIFIC ROAD 

Western Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA 

American Falls 

Reservoir 4R-Reconstruction-Relocation 2016 2017 $457 Thousand $536 Thousand 

Kansas CAWKER CITY CAUSEWAY 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Mitchell County 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing Waconda Lake 2015 2018 $573 Thousand $716 Thousand 

Kansas CHENEY RESERVOIR ACCESS 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Kingman County 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing 2018 2021 $938 Thousand $1.3 Million 

Montana 

FRESNO RESERVOIR ROAD SURFACE 

PRESERVATION PROJECT 

Western Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Hill County 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing Fresno Reservoir 2014 2018 $395 Thousand $456 Thousand 

Montana GOOSE BAY ROAD Broadwater County Broadwater County 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing 

y 

Campground area on Canyon 

Ferry Reservoir 2016 2021 $1.3 Million $1.5 Million 

Montana LAKE ELWELL BOR LANDS ACCESS 

Western Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Liberty County 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing 

Lake Elwell, Tiber Dam, Marias 

River Recreation Areas 2016 2021 $1 Million $1.2 Million 

Nebraska CALAMUS RESERVOIR ACCESS Nebraska DOT Garfield County 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing Calamus Reservoir 2018 2024 $1.3 Million $4.2 Million 

New 

Mexico COTTONWOOD CAMPGROUND BRIDGE 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA San Juan County Bridge-New Lake Navajo 2022 2022 $2.3 Million $2.7 Million 

New 

Mexico LAKESHORE ROAD 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Sierra County Bridge-New Elephant Butte Reservoir 2021 2021 $10.4 Million $12.2 Million 

North 

Dakota PATTERSON LAKE ACCESS ROAD 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Stark County 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing E.A. Patterson Lake 2014 2015 $229 Thousand $283 Thousand 

North 

Dakota PELICAN POINT ACCESS ROAD 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Stutsman County 4R-Reconstruction-Relocation Pelican Point 2013 2014 $373 Thousand $461 Thousand 

Oklahoma LAKE THUNDERBIRD ACCESS 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA OK State Parks 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing 

Norman Project -

Lake Thunderbird 2019 2023 $1.2 Million $1.5 Million 

Oregon HAGG LAKE PERIMETER ROAD 

Western Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA 

Washington 

County 4R-Reconstruction-Relocation 

Scoggins Dam & Henry Hagg 

Lake 2016 2017 $5.9 Million $8.6 Million 

Oregon 

HAGG LAKE PERIMETER ROAD; MP 2.7 

SLIDE REPAIR 

Western Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA 

Washington 

County 4R-Reconstruction-Relocation 

Scoggins Dam & Henry Hagg 

Lake 2016 2017 $2.8 Million $3.1 Million 

Utah CAUSEY RESERVOIR ACCESS 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Weber County 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing Causey Dam 2019 2025 $7.4 Million $9.2 Million 

Wyoming GROS VENTRE ROAD 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Natrona County 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing Alcova Reservoir 2018 2020 $3.2 Million $4.0 Million 

Wyoming KORTES ROAD 

Central Federal Lands Highway 

Division, FHWA Natrona County 3R-Maintenance-Resurfacing Great Plains Region 2013 2021 $10.5 Million $11.6 Million 

Total 

Projects 25 

Estimated Total Project 

Costs $110 Million 
APPENDIX J. 

Road Inventory Program Comparison to 2018-2019 

Transportation Needs Assessment 

The Reclamation Transportation Needs Assessment was performed in 2018 and 2019 prior to 

Reclamation receiving its first Road Inventory Program (RIP) data with treatment costs. Since that 

time, the RIP data for the Lower Colorado Basin and Upper Colorado Basin Regions has been 

completed. The following analysis compares the transportation needs collected in the Needs 

Assessment to the RIP data to see what percent of RIP treatment needs were collected in the Needs 

Assessment. 

LCB Region 

The Needs Assessment for the LCB Region identified 16 needs for a total of $28.75 M. The RIP data 

for LCB identified $24.2 M in RIP needs on roads and parking lots including pavement preservation 

activities. Within the Needs Assessment, there were five needs that were also fully or partially 

identified in the RIP treatment needs for a total of $9 M. This means that $15.2 M of RIP needs, or 63 

percent, were not captured in the Needs Assessment. 

UCB Region 

The Needs Assessment for the UCB Region identified 39 needs for a total of $67.5 M. The RIP data 

for UCB identified $71.2 M in RIP needs on roads and parking lots including pavement preservation 

activities. Within the Needs Assessment, there were 22 needs that were also fully or partially 

identified in the RIP treatment needs for a total of $48.25 M. This means that $22.95 M of RIP needs, 

or 32 percent, were not captured in the Needs Assessment. 

Reclamation-Wide 

After combining both regions, approximately 40 percent of the RIP needs were not captured in the 

Needs Assessment. In addition, Reclamation only has RIP data on two of the five regions. The 

following table extrapolates the RIP treatment needs for the two regions across all of Reclamation’s 

public road mileage. 

Public 

Road Costs 

Public 

Parking 

Costs 

Sum of 

Treatment 

Costs 

Sum of 

Public 

Miles 

Cost per 

Mile 

LCB $16,009,402 $8,200,890 $24,210,292 478.13 $50,635 

UCB $45,022,781 $26,197,457 $71,220,238 472.97 $150,581 

TOTAL $61,032,183 $34,398,347 $95,430,530 951.1 $100,337 
 

2020 Reclamation Reported Public Roads 2,857 

Estimated Maintenance Need per Mile $100,337 

Estimated Total Road Network Maintenance 

Need $286,662,837 

40% of RIP Need (Estimate of RIP needs not 

captured in Needs Assessment) $114,665,135 

Total Need Timeframe and Estimating Total Overall Need 

The LRTP is currently based on a 20-year plan. This means that the needs collected through the 

assessment were supposed to represent Reclamation’s need over 20 years. Regions were asked to 

consider needs over the next 20 years. However, the vast majority of needs collected are needs that 

are needed today, not 10-15 years from now. The assessment assumes that if all needs were 

completed today, then there would be no more needs over the next 20 years. However, it was not 

able to capture and incorporate reoccurring maintenance costs like chip seals, overlays, full 

pavement replacements, gravel replacements, guardrail replacement, etc. The total needs collected 

through the needs assessment was $332 million (with inflation). While this number is used as part of 

the overall need estimate, it is again assumed this number is reflective of only about 10 years of 

need, versus 20 years. It is expected this number will increase over the next 5 years. 

Reclamation is still in the first cycle of RIP collection, but based on experience from other Federal 

Land Management Agencies, RIP needs tend to go up over time. Condition goes down over time. 

This is similar for the bridge program. Bridge inspections are performed typically every 2 years. 

However, using the RIP analysis available now, and accounting for overlap with the needs 

assessment, it is estimated above that there is at least another $132 million (with inflation) in 

roadway improvements that will be needed. Again, this need is considered to be in the immediate 

next 10 years, and expected to grow as more data is gathered. 

These two estimates, along with consideration for fixing Reclamation’s 25 structurally deficient 

bridges and some consideration for trail maintenance, will be used to determine Reclamation’s need 

over the next year. 
 

Acknowledgements 

The Reclamation National LRTP was prepared by Reclamation’s Asset Management 

Division and Federal Lands Highway Central Federal Lands Highway Division. 

The U.S. Department of Transportation Volpe Center, representatives from across 

Reclamation regions and divisions, and representatives from across Federal Lands 

Highway, provided significant edits and content throughout development.