alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55776-55777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28451]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Connecticut Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference 
of the Connecticut Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 12, 1997, and 
Thursday, November 13, 1997, at the Taurig Learning Center, Library 
Resource Room (Room 501), Naugatuck Valley Community-Technical College, 
750 Chase Parkway, Waterbury, Connecticut 06708. The purpose of the 
conference is to bring together subject matter experts, civil rights 
leaders, and public officials to inform the Committee and the public on 
major civil rights issues and discuss their possible solutions.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Neil Macy, 860-
242-7287, planning subcommittee Chairperson Patrick J. Johnson, Jr., 
860-242-9577, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, 
202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who will 
attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.


[[Page 55777]]


    Dated at Washington, DC, October 16, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-28451 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
From: Paul Regina [mailto:pregina@bia.org]

Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 1:39 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon

Cc: Susan Miller

Subject: drop box link from BIA

Here is the drop box link from EPA. Let me know if you have any issues opening the file. 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/l136562b2r82qcv/Dropbox%20-

%20MA%20Stack%20Test%20Reports%20August%20Oct%202012_pdf_pdf.mht?dl=0

Paul Regina

919-380-2191
TATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

The Honorable John Quigley, Secretary Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-2063



### Dear

# secret~**r** NOV 1 2 201G

By letter and enclosures dated July 13,2015,the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) an annual ambient air monitoring network plan in accordance with the regulatory requirements of40 CFR Section 58- Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. Based on our review, EPA hereby approves PADEP's July 13,2015 annual ambient air monitoring networkplan on the basis that the plan meets the requirements of40 CFR Part 58.10.
Additionally, 40 CFR Section 58.11(c) requires any changes to the air monitoring network or design ofthe following air monitoring systems be approved by the EPA Administrator: a) Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Systems (PAMS) b) Particulate Matter Speciation Trends Network (STN) c) TheNational Core Monitoring Network (NCore)

EPA determined that PADEP's July 13, 2015 annual ambient air monitoring network plan does not require approval from the EPA Administrator because there were no changes to any ofthe air monitoring systems listed above.

Ifyou have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me or have your staffcontact Ms. Kinshasa Brown-Perry, EPA's Pennsylvania Liaison, at (215) 814-5404. Forquestions regarding this approval action, your staffmay contact Mr. David L. Amold, Acting Director, Air Protection Division, at (215) 814-2172.

cc: Ms. Joyce Epps, PADEP

Printedon 100% recycled/recyclablepaper with l00%post-consumer fiber andprocess chlorine free. CustomerServiceHotline: 1-800-438-2474
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GARTOR KIKI BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 497 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of February, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3746 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3746

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain spouses eligible 
  for services under the disabled veterans' outreach program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gold Star and Surviving Spouse 
Career Services Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF SPOUSES FOR SERVICES UNDER THE DISABLED 
              VETERANS' OUTREACH PROGRAM.

    Section 4103A of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph 
                        (A), by inserting ``and eligible persons'' 
                        after ``eligible veterans''; and
                            (ii) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ``, 
                        and eligible persons,'' after ``Other eligible 
                        veterans'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``and eligible 
                persons'' after ``veterans'' each place it appears; and
                    (C) in paragraph (3)--
                            (i) by inserting ``or eligible person'' 
                        after ``veteran'' each place it appears; and
                            (ii) by inserting ``or eligible person's'' 
                        after ``veteran's'';
            (2) in subsection (d)(1)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and eligible persons'' after 
                ``eligible veterans'' each place it appears; and
                    (B) by striking ``non-veteran-related''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Eligible Person Defined.--In this section, the term `eligible 
person' means--
            ``(1) any spouse described in section 4101(5) of this 
        title; or
            ``(2) the spouse of any person who died while a member of 
        the Armed Forces.''.

            Passed the Senate December 2, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3746

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain spouses eligible 
  for services under the disabled veterans' outreach program, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
**CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 
 
 I, Kevin
D. Johnson, certify that;
 
 (1)  
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Snap2 Corporation;
 
 (2)  
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 (3)  
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4)  
The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 a)  
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) 
 Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5)  
The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a)  
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)  
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.
 
 Date:  May 18,
2005
 
 
 /s/    
Kevin D.
Johnson
 By:   
Kevin D. Johnson
 Title:
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of FX Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David N. Pierce, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ David N. Pierce
-------------------------
David N. Pierce
Chief Executive Officer
March 10, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-1058

___________________________

Samuel E. Haley, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Deborah Vinson, D.O.N. and CCHP; Stephanie Kasting, RN, HSA, CCHP; Glen

Babich, M.D., Medical Director, CCHP; Dan Martinez, #39182 - Functional Unit

Manager; Bryan Hoskins; Charles Reed, Sgt. , #53541 of Housing Unit #2

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau

____________

 Submitted: September 20, 2013

Filed: September 25, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Samuel E. Haley, Jr. appeals following the district court’s adverse grant of 1

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having conducted careful review

of Haley’s assertions of error, we find that there is no basis for reversal, and that an

extended opinion is unwarranted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed, see

8th Cir. R. 47B, and Haley’s two pending motions are denied.

______________________________

The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States DistrictJudge for the

1

Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               152,264
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         38,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     220,559
<PP&E>                                             1,016,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                       250,898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1,339,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                609,808
<BONDS>                                            1,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                              23,624
<OTHER-SE>                                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1,339,679
<SALES>                                               36,878
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      36,878
<CGS>                                                 72,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         72,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1,269,514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,246,226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (2,548,044)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (2,548,044)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (2,548,044)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.11)



</TABLE>
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3755 

To amend the CARES Act to remove a requirement on lessors to provide 

notice to vacate, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2024 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. HAGERTY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the CARES Act to remove a requirement on 

lessors to provide notice to vacate, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Respect State Housing 

5 Laws Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NOTICE. 

7 Section 4024 of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9058) 

8 is amended by striking subsection (c). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Jon CARLTON, Appellant, v. Elliot L. MILLER, Appellee.

No. 69-386.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 19, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
U.S. Department 

Of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration

400 Seventh St., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

January 23, 1995 

Refer to: HNG-14/SS-51 

Mr. Herbert J. Henry 

Telespar Product Manager 

Unistrut Corporation 

35660 Clinton Street 

Wayne, Michigan 48184-2091 

Dear Mr. Henry: 

In your January 9 fax letter to Mr. James H. Hatton, you indicated that you wish to 

augment your Telespar Sign Post product offering by including posts made of ASTM 

A570 steel that will have a minimum yield strength of 413.69 MPa (60,000 psi). In 

addition, you requested the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) acceptance of 

several of these posts installed in a variety of configurations for use on National Highway 

System (NHS) projects. After reviewing our records of experience with similar posts we 

find that we can comply with your request, with some limitations. 

These limitations pertain to non-acceptance of a few post sizes and to the mechanical 

properties of the steel used in the posts. The square perforated sign posts that we have 

knowledge of meeting our breakaway requirements were made of steel with mill test 

reports showing yield strengths ranging from 417.82 to 453.68 Mpa (60,600 to 65,800 

psi), ultimate tensile strengths ranging from 474.36 Mpa to 512.97 Mpa (68,000 to 

74,000 psi), and elongations over 50 mm (2 inches) of between 16 and 18 percent. Our 

typical acceptance letter contains a caveat that “we anticipate that the States will require 

certification...that the hardware furnished has essentially the same chemistry, mechanical 

properties, and geometry as that [tested] and that it will meet the FHWA change in 

velocity requirement.” At the acceptance margins we believe it would be unwise for a 

supplier of perforated steel tube sign posts to make such a certification without 

confirming crash tests if the mill test reports for the steel used show ultimate tensile 

strengths greater than 550 Mpa (79,800 psi) or elongations over 50 mm (2 inches) greater 

than 20 percent. The post sizes and use conditions we will find acceptable for use on the 

NHS, if proposed by a State, are shown in the enclosed table. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 
 Jerry L. Poston, Chief 

 Federal-Aid and Design Division 

Enclosure 

Geometric and Roadside Design Acceptance Letter SS-51 

Federal Highway Administration 

HNG-14:JHatton:366-1329:gm:1-23-95:Henry 

Copies to: HPD-1 HNG-1 HNG-10 HNG-14 Reader, 3128 File, 3128 

Ras HFL-1 HHS-10 HSR-20 HNG-12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,633
<SECURITIES>                                    11,796
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,060
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,406
<PP&E>                                          44,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,583
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           10,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           248
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,547
<SALES>                                         20,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,966
<CGS>                                           14,561
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,561
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,753
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   373
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,225)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,225)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.57)


</TABLE>
FLAP Obligations/Expenditures by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FLAP Loan/Credits by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$0 $0 $0 $0 ($22,138) $63,000 $40,862

Programming Decisions Committee Members

Name Phone  E-mail Title

Jacinda Russell 571-434-1543 Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov Access Program Manager

Robert Rocchio 401-222-2694... brocchio@dot.ri.gov Managing Engineer

Linsey Callaghan 401-222-6479 Linsey.Callaghan@doa.ri.gov Supervising Transportation Planner, RI Statewide Planning Program (MPO)

Call for Projects information

Start Date End Date

No. applications

received

Total Access funds

requested

7/15/2013 8/16/2013 1 $40,992

1/19/2015 4/17/2015 0 $0

7/15/2016 12/16/2016 1 $90,000

Local Match

19.95%

Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP)

Rhode Island

Projects Programmed

0

FLAP Funds Programmed

0

Federal Lands Highway Division

EFLHD

FLAP Allocations by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$13,644 $13,747 $13,471 $11,316 $11,313 $14,052 $77,543

$131K
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-10166

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

THE KIDWELL GROUP LLC

d.b.a. Air Quality Assessors of Florida,

other Suburban Extended Stay Kunal Patel,

Plaintiff,

J & K SAI HOSPITALITY LLC, 

d.b.a. Suburban Extended Stay,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant.

USCA11 Case: 23-10166 Document: 62-1 Date Filed: 02/13/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-10166

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 3:22-cv-04377-MCR-MJF

____________________

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

J & K Sai Hospitality LLC’s motions to dismiss this appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction are GRANTED. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s order compelling appraisal and staying the 

proceedings pending appraisal for the reasons stated in Positano 

Place at Naples I Condominium Association v. Empire Indemnity Insurance Co., 84 F.4th 1241 (11th Cir. 2023). The order compelling appraisal is a non-final interlocutory order that is not immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) or the Federal Arbitration 

Act. See id. at 1255. 

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Steadfast Insurance Company’s unopposed motion to amend 

its response to the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, as we have 

considered the amended response.

USCA11 Case: 23-10166 Document: 62-1 Date Filed: 02/13/2024 Page: 2 of 2