alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2326

BOLUMBE HENRI IKETE, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-513-634) Submitted: January 26, 2007 Decided: February 28, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bolumbe Henri Ikete, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel Eric Goldman, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bolumbe Henri Ikete, a native and citizen of the Democratic Republic of Congo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We treat the immigration judge’s reasoning as that of the Board’s in our review. Haoua v. Gonzales , 472 F.3d 227, __, 2007 WL 29463, *2 (4th Cir. Jan. 5, 2007) (citing Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 366 (4th Cir. 2004)). Ikete challenges the immigration judge’s finding that his testimony was not credible and that he otherwise failed to meet his burden of proof to qualify for asylum. We will uphold a negative credibility determination if it is supported by substantial evidence, see Tewabe v. Gonzales , 446 F.3d 533, 538 (4th Cir. 2006), and reverse the Board’s decision only if the evidence “was so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 325 n.14 (4th Cir. 2002) (internal quotations and citations omitted). We have reviewed the administr ative record and the immigration judge’s decision and find that substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility finding and the ruling that Ikete failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution as necessary to establish eligibility for- 3 - asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2006) (stating that the burden of proof is on the alien to establish eligibility for asylum); INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same). Similarly, because Ikete does not qualify for asylum, he is ineligible for withholding of removal. SeeCamara , 378 F.3d at 367. Ikete seeks to challenge the immigration judge’s failure to grant him protection under the Convention Against Torture, a claim he did not present to the Board. “A court may review a final order of removal only if . . . the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.” 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(d)(1) (West 2005). We therefore lack jurisdiction to consider this issue. Gandziami-Mickhou v. Gonzales , 445 F.3d 351, 359 n.2 (4th Cir. 2006) (citing Asika v. Ashcroft , 362 F.3d 264, 267 n.3 (4th Cir. 2004)). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
256 La. 1145

#### Claude E. NICHOLS v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY et al.

No. 50926.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 9, 1970.

In re: George L. Thompson and Claudia P. Thompson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 240 So.2d 568.

Writ denied. The case having been remanded the judgment is not final.
#### William Franklyn JONES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44852.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 11, 1974.

Rehearing Denied March 1, 1974.

Certiorari dismissed.
August 28, 2002 

 

HSA-10/B85B 

Mr. Rodney A. Boyd 

Trinity Highway Safety Products Division 

Box 568887 

Dallas, Texas 75356-9619 

Dear Mr. Boyd: 

Mr. Don Johnson’s July 5 letter to Mr. Richard Powers of my staff requested the 

Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) formal concurrence that raising the 

original King offset block 2 inches or 4 inches above the top of the steel support 

posts would not change the Test Level 3 status of the w-beam rail. He also 

requested acceptance of a modified block with an open face design for standard use 

and with the same height adjustment options. 

It remains the FHWA’s position that a height adjustment up to 4 inches is not likely 

to change a barrier’s crash performance, but two bolts must be used for the 

maximum 4-inch adjustment – one through the rail and block and a second one (to 

the left or right of the first) through the block alone. The double-bolt attachment is 

deemed necessary to hold the block in place during a typical impact. 

Regarding your request to modify the original design by eliminating the solid face, I 

agree that this modified block may be used in its normal position (flush with the top 

of the post), but a full-scale test would be needed for any height adjustment to this 

design. A pendulum test is not considered a reasonable surrogate for a full-scale 

test for the combination of a narrow, non-solid block installed above the top of the 

post because it does not replicate the post bending and twisting that occurs in an 

actual crash. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 (original signed by Carol H. Jacoby) 

 Carol H. Jacoby, P.E. 

 Director, Office of Safety Design
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-08599 |
|------------------------------------|-----------|

 

DWS Equity Trust

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code:(212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 08/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 08/31/08 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29276]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-29; OTS Nos. H-2965 and 02096]


Guaranty Federal Bancshares, M.H.C., Springfield, Missouri; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on October 27, 1997, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Guaranty Federal Bancshares, M.H.C., Springfield, Missouri, to convert 
to the stock form of Organization. Copies of the application are 
available for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift 
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20552, and the Midwest 
Regional Office, 122 W. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 600, Irving, 
Texas 75039-2010.

    Dated: October 31, 1997.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29276 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
**Exhibit 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of FX Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas B. Lovejoy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/ Clay Newton

Clay Newton

Chief Financial Officer

March 12, 2007

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
13.1





Certification


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of China Cord
Blood Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s
knowledge, that:





The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended March 31, 2010 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





CHINA
      CORD BLOOD CORPORATIONJuly
      16, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/
      Ting ZhengName:
                  Ting
      ZhengTitle:
                  Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)July
      16, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/
      Albert ChenName:
                  Albert
      ChenTitle:
                  Chief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1948

KATHLEEN LAMB DORSEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, AT WILMINGTON; SAMUEL B. CONNALLY, individually and in his official capacity as associate director of Human Resources, UNCW, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-96-7-BR) Submitted: June 9, 1998 Decided: June 30, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kathleen Lamb Dorsey, Appellant Pro Se. Celia Grasty Jones, Joyce S. Rutledge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kathleen Lamb Dorsey appeals the district court’s ordergranting defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this action alleging unlawful employment practices, in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to -17 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dorsey v. University of North Carolina at Wilmington , No. CA-93-96-7-BR (E.D.N.C. June 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Dominos, Inc. (the
Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 23, 2003 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Companys Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    HARRY J. SILVERMANHarry J. Silverman Chief Financial Officer




Dated: July 29, 2003
#### COCO PLUM WOMAN’S CLUB, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, and Yolanda Cohen, Respondents.

No. 77-1306.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 28, 1978.

Faye T. Dugas, in pro. per.

Kenneth H. Hart, Jr., Tallahassee, and James R. Parks, Miami, for respondents.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari is granted, the order of the Industrial Relations Commission under review is quashed, and the cause is remanded to the Industrial Relations Commission to entertain the petitioner’s appeal on the merits based on the respondent’s concession that the petitioner’s appeal herein was erroneously dismissed. *Polatnick v. Florida Department of Commerce,*349 So.2d 203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *State ex rel. Martinez v. Florida Division of Commerce,*339 So.2d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), and *Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Florida Department of Commerce,*252 So.2d 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11563

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CV-542

 USDC No. 4:15-CR-271-11

Before DENNIS, ELROD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mario Perez, federal prisoner # 50701-177, pleaded guilty to conspiracy 

to possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of a mixture or 

substance containing methamphetamine, and he was sentenced to 340 months 

of imprisonment. The district court denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion on the 

merits without holding an evidentiary hearing. Perez now seeks a certificate 

of appealability (COA). 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 22, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11563 Document: 00515426648 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/22/2020
No. 18-11563

2

Perez contends that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing 

to object to the inclusion of certain information in the factual basis for his plea, 

by promising he would receive a sentence of no more than 10 years of 

imprisonment, by significantly underestimating his sentencing exposure, by 

failing to object to the district court’s failure to adequately explain its reasons 

for awarding only a limited departure from the guidelines range, and for failing 

to object to the limited extent of that departure. He also argues that the 

district court erred by not holding an evidentiary hearing on his claims.

This court will grant a COA, which is required to appeal, only when the 

movant “has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 

(2003). “A petitioner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of 

reason could disagree with the district court’s resolution of his constitutional 

claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to 

deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El, 537 U.S. at 327.

Perez has not made the requisite showing. In addition, we lack 

jurisdiction to consider claims that were not presented to the district court. See

Black v. Davis, 902 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2018), cert. denied, 140 S. Ct. 859

(2020). Perez’s motion for a COA is denied.

We construe the motion for a COA with respect to the district court’s 

failure to hold an evidentiary hearing as a direct appeal of that issue, see

Norman v. Stephens, 817 F.3d 226, 234 (5th Cir. 2016), and affirm.

COA DENIED; AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-11563 Document: 00515426648 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/22/2020
Summary of C losest Nonattainment and Maintenance Receptors to Oregon

Closest Nonattainment Receptors to Oregon

– 1997 8

- hour ozone NAAQS

Closest Receptor Distance to Oregon Border Eastern U.S. (Transport Rule Proposal) Dallas

- Fort Worth and Houston

Galveston

- Brazoria 1230 miles

Western U.S. (Timin Memo) Nevada County, California 170 miles

Closest Nonattainment Receptors to Oregon

– 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS

Closest Receptor Distance to Oregon Border Eastern U.S. (Transport Rule Proposal) Madison County, Illinois 1420 miles

Western U.S. (Timin Memo) Fresno County, California 305 miles

Closest Maintenance Receptors to Oregon

– 1997 8

- hour ozone NAAQS

Closest Receptor Distance to Oregon Border Eastern U.S. (Transport Rule Proposal) Dall as

- Fort Worth and Houston

Galveston

- Brazoria 1230 miles

Western U.S. (Timin Memo) Placer County, California 185 miles

Closest Maintenance Receptors to Oregon

– 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS

Closest Receptor Distance to Oregon Border Eastern U.S. (Transport Rule Proposal) Harris County, Texas

Western U.S. (Timin Memo) Los Angeles County, California 495 miles
Tabulation of Bids

Report Date: 07/14/14

1 out of 2

Project No: OR FS ERFO 121-19102

Project Name: Agness Road Slide Repair, MP13.2

Schedule: A

Schedule Type: Base

Solcitation No: DTFH70-14-B-00010

Division: Western Federal Lands

State: OR County: 

Federal Land: Opened at: Vancouver, WA

Opened by: Angy Liljedahl

Date: 07/11/14

I certify that this Bid Tabulation accurately reflects the offers received for this solicitation.

Signed: _______________________________

Title: _______________________________

Date: _______________________________

Contract Awarded to: ____________________ Award Date: ____________________

Contractor Comment Bid Amount Responsive

TIDEWATER CONTRACTORS INC. $309,909.09

PO Box 1956

Brookings, OR 97415

LASKEY-CLIFTON CORPORATION $362,634.00

PO BOX 50

REEDSPORT, OR 97467

HOOKER CREEK, INC. $418,000.00

2150 Main Street, Suite 2

Red Bluff, CA 96080

Engineer's Estimate $208,561.00
Tabulation of Bids

Report Date: 07/14/14

2 out of 2

Project No: OR FS ERFO 121-19102

Project Name: Agness Road Slide Repair, MP13.2

Schedule: A

Schedule Type: Base

Line

Item Pay Item No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount

Number

A0020 15101-0000 MOBILIZATION 

TIDEWATER CONTRACTORS INC. Lump Sum $309,909.09

LASKEY-CLIFTON CORPORATION Lump Sum $362,634.00

HOOKER CREEK, INC. Lump Sum $418,000.00

Engineer's Estimate ALL LPSM Lump Sum $208,561.00

Total Schedule - All Items

TIDEWATER CONTRACTORS INC. $309,909.09

LASKEY-CLIFTON CORPORATION $362,634.00

HOOKER CREEK, INC. $418,000.00

Engineer's Estimate $208,561.00
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Family strong.**
 
2012: Vol 5 No 1 | Vol 5 No 2 | Vol 5 No 3
2013: Vol 6 No 1 | Vol 6 No 2
 
SuDoc:D 101.159:
Item Number:0325-A-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000915176
 
November 17, 2017
EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Via Vid Broadcasting Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Brian
Kathler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Brian Kathler
-----------------



Brian Kathler
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002









                                       34
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 102797C]


Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
convene a public meeting of the Florida/Alabama Habitat Protection 
Advisory Panel (AP).

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, November 20, 1997, and is 
scheduled to begin at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the at the Radisson Bay Harbor 
Inn, 7700 Courtney Campbell Causeway, Tampa, FL 33609; telephone: 813-
281-8900.
    Council address: Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, 3018 
U.S. Highway 301 North, Suite 1000, Tampa, FL 33619.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Rester, Habitat Specialist, Gulf 
States Marine Fisheries Commission; telephone: 601-875-5912.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At this meeting, the AP will discuss an 
update on the Fenholloway River, and the expansion of U.S. 1 in Monroe 
County. The AP will also hear reports on the status of completion of 
the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) guidelines being developed by NMFS; 
and of completion of a generic amendment by the Council which describes 
EFH as required by the Sustainable Fisheries Act. An overview of the 
Florida Marine Research Institute's mapping of fisheries habitat, and 
an update of the status of artificial reefs in Florida will also be 
presented.
    A copy of the agenda can be obtained by calling 813-228-2815. 
Although other issues not on the agenda may come before the AP for 
discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act, those issues may not be the subject of 
formal AP action during this meeting. AP action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically identified in the agenda listed as available 
by this notice.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Anne Alford at the Council (see ADDRESSES) by 
November 13, 1997.

    Dated: October 29, 1997.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-29159 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F