alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**COASTAL
      CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.**




**FORM
      10-Q**




**PART
      II - OTHER INFORMATION**





**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals,
      Ltd. (the "Company") on FORM 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Phillip W. Ware, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.






Date:
              May 10, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Phillip
              W. WarePhillip
              W. WareChief
              Executive Officer,President and Principal Financial
              Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and will be retained by Coastal
      Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Lucille Harrell Rupert MERRILL, Appellant, v. Lloyd R. MERRILL, Appellee.

No. HH-332.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 28, 1978.

*793Ronald A. Nour, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Arthur H. Gehris, III, of Elliott, Tindell & Gehris, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

The wife appeals from a marriage dissolution judgment which found that the husband has a special equity in certain real and personal property which was wholly acquired and paid for by the husband long before the seven-month marriage, and which during the marriage he transferred into the joint names of his wife and himself. The wife testified that the transfers during coverture were intended by the husband as a gift to the wife; but he testified, apparently with telling effect o,n the chancellor, that no gift was intended and that the transfers were made solely for survivorship purposes during coverture. We cannot read *Ball v. Ball,*335 So.2d 5, 7 (Fla.1976), as holding that a word or two of testimony by the recipient spouse, to the effect that the other intended a gift, obliterates the special equity resulting from an unrebutted showing that the grantor spouse acquired the property from sources entirely independent of the marriage. Such a reading of *Ball*would manipulate its doctrines mechanically if not magically. The question of dona-tive intent is one of a preponderance of the credible evidence; and that question is for the chancellor, not for us.

We recognize the seeming inequity of restoring the husband’s separate property to him and not somehow recompensing the wife for her loss, upon entering the marriage, of a substantial pension which was paid to her as widow of her former husband. Yet that appealing factor cannot be given effect to destroy the husband’s special equity in previously acquired property. Even though the wife’s sacrifice of her pension was a contribution to the marriage, it was not a contribution of material resources to the marriage, nor was it a contribution toward the husband’s acquisition of the subject property. See *Ball,*335 So.2d at 7, n. 7.

We recognize also that the Supreme Court in *Ball*limited its decision to questions of real property, 335 So.2d at 8, n. 11, and that we áre here concerned with common stock as well as with land. We find no basis for treating personal property differently.

No other error appears. The judgment is

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and MELVIN, J., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22

                                October 17, 2002

Mercantile Bank Corporation
Mercantile Bank of West Michigan
5650 Byron Center Avenue SW
Wyoming, Michigan 49509

         Re:  Amendment to Employment Agreement dated October 18, 2001

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         This letter confirms our agreement reached today regarding the
Employment Agreement dated as of October 18, 2001 by and among you and me (the
"Employment Agreement"). We have agreed that Section 8.5(d) of the Employment
Agreement is amended effective immediately by deleting its current text and
substituting the following text in its place:

                  "(d) any term life insurance policies without any cash
         surrender value, or any term life insurance policies having a cash
         surrender value that is under $10,000 in aggregate amount, owned by the
         Bank or the Company and insuring the life of the Employee, to the
         extent they may be practically assigned or transferred to the Employee
         without any adverse affect on the Bank or the Company, and which upon
         assignment or transfer to the Employee the cash surrender value of the
         policy is paid by the Employee to the Bank or the Company, whichever is
         the owner of the policy, plus"

         I understand and agree that my execution of this letter is in part to
induce you to increase my annual base salary for 2003 under the Employment
Agreement, and to make the Employment Agreement more closely reflect our mutual
intent.

         Except as specifically amended by this letter, all of the terms of the
Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. This letter may be
executed in counterparts, and is governed by Michigan law.

                                             /s/ Michael H. Price
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                           (signature)
                                             Michael H. Price
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             (print or type Employee's name)
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION

By: /s/ Gerald R. Johnson, Jr.
    ----------------------------------------
    Its: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

MERCANTILE BANK OF WEST MICHIGAN

By: /s/ Gerald R. Johnson, Jr.
    ----------------------------------------
     Its: Chairman
#### Ann S. MEEKINS, etc., et al., Appellants, v. George Washington DURRANCE, et al., Appellees. Deborah L. MEEKINS, etc., et al., Appellants, v. George Washington DURRANCE, et al., Appellees. Mary Ann MEEKINS, et al., Appellants, v. George Washington DURRANCE, et al., Appellees.

Nos. L-299, L-301.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Nov. 6, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 3, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CHARTERED

1100  1177 West Hastings Street

ACCOUNTANTS

Vancouver, B.C.  V6E 4T5

MacKay LLP

Tel: 604-687-4511

Fax: 604-687-5805

Toll Free: 1-800-351-0426

www.MacKayLLP.ca





December 22, 2003

Our file No. 823 01290



Mr. Cameron King

RedCell Power Corporation

440 Stevens Drive

West Vancouver BC V7S 1C6





Dear Sirs:



Re:

Interim Quarterly financial statements for RedCell Power Corporation



We have performed a limited review of the interim financial statements of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.   Our limited review was solely to conform to the US Securities Exchange Commission Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B and should not be used or referred to for any other purpose.



We have not issued a report for the limited review.  If, in any filing with the SEC, the company states that the interim financial statements have been reviewed by an independent public accountant, a report must be filed with the interim financial statements.





Yours truly,

MacKay LLP





Sean Gilbert



Sean Gilbert, CA

Partner





Q:\82301290\#wp\letters\june 2003review(signed)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28873]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 211 / Friday, October 31, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 58938]]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Subcommittee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intergovernmental Advisory Committee will meet on November 
6, 1997, at the Double Tree Hotel, Columbia River, Portland, Oregon. 
The purpose of the meeting is to continue discussions on the 
implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan. The meeting will begin at 
9:15 a.m. and continue until 3:00 p.m. Agenda items to be discussed 
include, but are not limited to: review accomplishments for the year, 
ongoing and potential activities for the coming year, and effectiveness 
monitoring. The IAC meeting will be open to the public and is fully 
accessible for people with disabilities. Interpreters are available 
upon request in advance. Written comments may be submitted for the 
record at the meeting. Time will also be scheduled for oral public 
comments. Interested persons are encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding this meeting may be directed to Don Knowles, 
Executive Director, Regional Ecosystem Office, 333 SW 1st Avenue, P.O. 
Box 3623, Portland, OR 97208 (Phone: 503-808-2180).

    Dated: October 24, 1997.
Donald R. Knowles,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 97-28873 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
##### 



Exhibit 10.41 OXiGENE, Inc.
Description of Director Compensation Arrangement The Company pays each non-employee director an annual fee of $25,000 for service as a director
of the Company and $1,500 for attendance at each board meeting. The Company pays each non-employee
director who serves as chairman of a committee of the Board an annual fee of $7,500 and each
committee member, including the Chairman, $1,000 for attendance at each committee meeting. In
addition, non-employee directors are eligible to participate in the Companys Amended and Restated
1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1996 Plan). There are currently 2,500,000 shares of common stock
reserved for issuance under the 1996 Plan. Upon the election of a non-employee director, such
director is granted an option to purchase shares of common stock. Such options generally become
exercisable in equal installments over a four year period on each anniversary of the grant,
provided that the optionee is still a director of the Company at the opening of business on such
date. Each option has a term of ten years. The exercise price for each option is equal to the last
sale price for the common stock on the date of grant, as reported on the NASDAQ National Market.
The exercise price may be paid in cash, shares of common stock or a combination of both.
Date,"LT Real Average (10> Yrs)"
02/23/2024,2.14
02/22/2024,2.21
02/21/2024,2.20
02/20/2024,2.19
02/16/2024,2.18
02/15/2024,2.18
02/14/2024,2.20
02/13/2024,2.22
02/12/2024,2.16
02/09/2024,2.15
02/08/2024,2.14
02/07/2024,2.10
02/06/2024,2.08
02/05/2024,2.12
02/02/2024,2.04
02/01/2024,1.93
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Ryan K. "Coconut" Koffman <rcoconut@yahoo.com>

Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 3:06 AM

To: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Cc: Ryan Koffman

Subject: Re: Petition for Exemption Docket No. FAA-2014-0958-0001, Ryan K. Koffman

Attachments: Motion Picture & Television Operations Manual.docx

Ms. Nia Daniels, 

Thank you for contacting me regarding clarification with my exemption request. 

I did intend to use the sUAS for closed-set filming and I was informed by an email from Brad Howard, 

All Weather Program Manager/UAS Specialist AWP-220, NextGen Branch, dated December 16, 

2014 "The FAA does not regulate that airspace inside buildings or structures." 

The above statement lead me to believe it was acceptable to utilize sUAS indoors for commercial 

purposes since the sUAS would not operate near/in the NAS. 

I do apologize for this misunderstanding on my behalf and you will see I have attached a Motion 

Picture and Television Operations Manual along with this email in which I hope is acceptable. 

I'm sure you may understand this is proprietary information and would greatly appreciate if this 

information not be made public. 

I am looking forward to hearing from you in the future. 

Thank you for your time and assistance regarding my petition. 

Sincerely, 

Ryan K. Koffman 

Ryan K. Koffman 

12289 Daisy Court 

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739-1921 

805-895-6425 

rcoconut@yahoo.com

 

From: "Nia.Daniels@faa.gov" <Nia.Daniels@faa.gov> 

To: rcoconut@yahoo.com 

Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 1:38 PM 

Subject: Petition for Exemption

Mr. Koffman, 

 
2

I am contacting you to get clarification on your exemption request. Did you intend to use your sUAS 

for closed-set filming? If so, please provide a motion pictures and television operations manual. 

 

If not, we can proceed forward with your exemption request. 

 

Thank you, 

 

Nia Daniels, ARM-108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 - 7626

Fax: (202) 267 - 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
**Exhibit 21.01**

 

**Schedule of Subsidiaries**

 

FX Energy, Inc. (Nevada)

FX Drilling Company, Inc. (Nevada)

FX Producing Company, Inc. (Nevada)

Frontier Exploration Company (Utah)

FX Energy Netherlands Partnership C.V. (Netherlands)

 

FX Energy Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands)

 

FX Energy Poland Spolka Z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnoscia (Poland)

FX Energy Poland Sp. Z O.O. I Wspolnicy (Pomerania) Spolka Jawna (Poland)

 

Warmia Petroleum, Sp. zo.o.

 

Karpaty Petroleum, Sp. z o.o.

 

Sudety Mining Sp. z o.o.
#### Bobby W. HARRIS v. Charles JUGE et al.

No. 60788.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 10, 1977.

In re: Bobby W. Harris, applying for writs of mandamus, prohibition and supervisory writs.

Application denied: there is not sufficient showing that applicant will suffer irreparable injury from the ruling complained of.

SANDERS, C. J., and MARCUS, J.

concur in denial being of the opinion that the trial judge has not abused his discretion.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tasco International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Adrienne Humphries, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
9th day of August 2004.


/s/ Adrienne Humphreys
----------------------------
Adrienne Humphreys
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION OF


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF GREEN CARBON TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Green Carbon
Technologies Corp. for the year ended June 30, 2010, the undersigned, David
Rendina, President and Chief Executive Officer of Green Carbon Technologies
Corp., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) such
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June
30, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Green Carbon Technologies Corp.





Date:  October
      12, 2010/s/
      David RendinaDavid
      RendinaPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-166315) pertaining to VimpelCom Ltd.’s Amended and Restated VimpelCom 2000 Stock Option Plan and the VimpelCom 2010 Stock Option Plan of ourreport dated June 1, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of VimpelCom Ltd (‘VimpelCom’), and our report dated June 1, 2011, with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofVimpelCom as of December 31, 2010, included in VimpelCom’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG ACCOUNTANTS LLP 

Rotterdam, the Netherlands 

June 30, 2011
# L_2005210EN.01000701.xml

| 12.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1316/2005

of 11 August 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 2nd partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2rd partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 41,841 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 August 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 August 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

2

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Varian,
Inc.



Dated: February 7, 2005



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. EDWARD MCCLAMMY                                                         
|G. Edward McClammy Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Exhibit 32.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Comprehensive Care Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2004 (the Report),
Robert J. Landis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Robert J. LandisRobert J. LandisChairman, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerOctober 7, 2004
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Comprehensive Care
Corporation and will be retained by Comprehensive Care Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 19