alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.11





PROMISSORY NOTE




$1.925.00
November 16, 2010Austin, Texas


FOR VALUE, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Restaurant Concepts of America, a Nevada company referred to as (“Borrower”), promises to pay to David Cho (“Lender”), or order, at Austin, Texas, or as otherwise instructed, the principal sum of one thousand nine hundred twenty-five dollars ($1,925.00) in lawful tender of the United States, together with simple interest thereon at an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%).





Terms of Repayment. This Promissory Note shall become due and payable together will all accrued interest on November 16, 2011.





Default.  Any one or more of the following events shall constitute a Default under the terms of this Note:





1)
Borrower fail to make timely payment when due.


2)
Borrower breaches an agreement or promise made to Lender, or fails to timely perform any obligation owing to Lender


3)
Borrower makes any representation or statement to Lender that is false or misleading in any material manner.


4)
Borrower becomes insolvent, or a receiver is appointed for any part of all of Borrower’s property, of Borrower makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or any proceeding is brought either by Borrower of against Borrower under any Bankruptcy or insolvency laws.





In the event of any default as described herein, Lender, without further protest, presentment or notice, may declare all sums due and payable, together with any interest then due.





Waiver.  Forbearance of any payment due of modification of any term of this Note by Lender in any manner shall not be deemed nor construed as a waiver of any other rights in favor of Lender under the terms of this Notice.





Legal.  This Note shall be construed in accordance with the laws of that State of Texas, which shall be the choice of jurisdiction and venue for purposes of enforcement of this Note.  If any action is brought to enforce any provision or collect on this Note, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement for all reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.




Restaurant Concepts of AmericaBy: /s/ David ChoDavid Cho - President / CEO
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Chris L. Gilbert and Glenn E. Janik, Appellant s

No. 06

- 13

- 00081

- CV v.
Kate M. Moseley, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law No 4 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CC

13

- 02405

- D ). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We further order that the appellant s , Chris L. Gilbert and Glenn E. Janik, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED DECEMBER 17 , 2014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements
of Hi-Rise Recycling Systems, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-89801) and Form S-8
(File No. 33-86260) of our report dated March 15, 2000, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Hi-Rise Recycling Systems, Inc., as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for the years then ended, which report is
included in this annual report on Form 10-KSB.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Miami, Florida
April 14, 2000
No. 00-824.

#### Palmer *v.*Transit Management Southeast Louisiana (TMSEL) Regional Transit Authority et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### David Garcia CEPERO, Appellant, v. Conchita Garcia CEPERO, Appellee.

No. 71-119.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 18, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Charles H. NATTELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-334.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3577 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 315
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3577

To designate the Federal building located at 300 E. 3rd Street in North 
 Platte, Nebraska, as the ``Virginia Smith Federal Building'', and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 11, 2024

 Mr. Ricketts (for himself and Mrs. Fischer) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

                            January 25, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Carper, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building located at 300 E. 3rd Street in North 
 Platte, Nebraska, as the ``Virginia Smith Federal Building'', and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VIRGINIA SMITH FEDERAL BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building located at 300 E. 3rd Street 
in North Platte, Nebraska, shall be known and designated as the 
``Virginia Smith Federal Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Virginia Smith Federal Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 315

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3577

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 300 E. 3rd Street in North 
 Platte, Nebraska, as the ``Virginia Smith Federal Building'', and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 25, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2006084EN.01006101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 23.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/61 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1048/2005 of 13 June 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 2032/2003 on the second phase of the 10-year work programme referred to in Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 178 of 9 July 2005](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2005_178_R_TOC)
)

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | On page 24, Annex II: | | | | --- | --- | | (i) | in the line concerning ‘5-Chloro-2-(4-chlorphenoxy)-phenol’, the EC number is replaced by ‘429-290-0’; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | (ii) | on page 25, the line concerning ‘Cyclohexylhydroxydiazene 1 oxide, potassium salt’ is replaced by the following: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Name (EINECS and/or others) | EC number | CAS number | PT01 | PT02 | PT03 | PT04 | PT05 | PT06 | PT07 | PT08 | PT09 | PT10 | PT11 | PT12 | PT13 | PT14 | PT15 | PT16 | PT17 | PT18 | PT19 | PT20 | PT21 | PT22 | PT23 | | ‘Cyclohexylhydroxydiazene 1-oxide, potassium salt | | 66603-10-9 | | | | | | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13’ | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | On page 31, in Annex IV: in all lines concerning ‘5-Chloro-2-(4-chlorphenoxy)-phenol’, the EC number is replaced by ‘429-290-0’. |

---
**Exhibit 13(1)**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**WITH RESPECT TO THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F**

**FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012**

**OF CHINA ENTERPRISES LIMITED**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,United States Code), the undersigned officer of China Enterprises Limited, a Bermuda company (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

Date: March 24, 2015 

 

The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officer.
#### MARYLAND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Georgia corporation, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, for the Use and Benefit of DADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 70-404, 70-406, 70-407.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 12, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 11, 1971.

*184Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellee.

George & McQuade, Miami, for appellant.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Maryland National Insurance Company appeals from final judgments in the Circuit Court of Dade County on three separate orders of forfeiture from the Criminal Court of Record, in and for Dade County, Florida. These appeals have been consolidated by order of this court.

Appellant argues that the final judgments were improperly entered by the trial court judge and that § 903.27, Fla.Stat., F. S.A., requires such judgments to be entered by the Clerk and that proper statutory procedure was not followed. It argues that the final judgments were also erroneous because they included costs and interests and these items are not specifically authorized under the terms of the statute.

While these points were vigorously argued here we cannot consider them as they are raised for the first time on appeal and were never presented to the trial judge for a ruling.

Section 903.271, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., permits appellant the right to have presented these arguments and points to the Circuit Court and permits that court to set aside the final judgment in whole or in part for reasonable cause shown within a time certain.

Appellant, by failing to utilize the statutory procedures, which would have permitted the trial court to make a determination of the points raised in this appeal, has not allowed the trial court judge to rule on these items and we may not consider them for the first time in this appeal. Margolis v. Klein, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 205; Beaty v. Beaty, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 54; and Wasserburg v. Coastal Aluminum Products Const. Co., Fla.App. 1964, 167 So. 2d 889.

The final judgments herein appealed are, therefore,

Affirmed.
#### Glenda Emmons BOLIEW, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Floyd Michael BOLIEW, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13476.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Nov. 9, 1977.

Thomas, Prestridge & Burchett by Dewey E. Burchett, Jr., Bossier City, for defendant-appellant.

James B. Wells, Bossier City, for plaintiff-appellee.

En Banc before BOLIN, PRICE, HALL, MARVIN and JONES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Upon lodging of the record in this suit for separation from bed and board and alimony, the court noted probable lack of jurisdiction due to appellant’s failure to file an appeal bond within the thirty-day period for taking an appeal provided by La.C.C.P. Arts. 3942, 3943, and 2087.

Appellant was notified of our probable lack of jurisdiction and failed to respond to our order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed.

Judgment was signed August 23, 1977. Appellant timely filed a motion for appeal on August 25, 1977, but failed to furnish security until October 11, 1977, which was untimely.

At appellant’s cost, the appeal is dismissed.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-701 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EXTRADITION 

Treaty Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MALTA 

Signed at Valletta May 18, 2006 

with 

Exchange of Letters 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 MALTA 

 Extradition 

Treaty signed at Valletta May 18, 2006; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 29, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-17, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-12, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Diplomatic Notes at Floriana 

 November 23, 2007 and March 16, 2009; 

Entered into force July 1, 2009. 

With exchange of letters.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric E. Parsons, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 8, 2008



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|/s/    ERIC E.
PARSONS                                         
|Eric E. Parsons Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Divisions


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Gas Utilization Research Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 11, 1997, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Gas Utilization Research 
Forum (``GURF'') has filed written notification simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damage under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, University of Bath, Bath, UNITED KINGDOM, is no longer 
participating in the Gas Utilization Research Forum.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group. Membership in this group remains open, and GURF 
intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes 
in membership. Information regarding membership in GURF may be obtained 
from the Secretary, Dennis Winegar, Manager, Technical Service & 
Project Development, Texaco Natural Gas International, P.O. Box 4700, 
Houston, TX 77210-4700, Telephone (713) 752-7654, Facsimile: (713) 752-
4681.
    On December 19, 1990, GURF filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 69a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
January 16, 1991, (56 FR 1655).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 24, 
1997. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on September 10, 1997 (62 FR 47690).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-28727 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
KENTUCKY- Agency Contacts

KY State KTC Ron Rigney Division of Program

Management

Ron.Rigney@ky.gov 502-564-3388

KY FHWA KY FHWA DO Bernadette Dupont Transportation Specialist bernadette.dupont@dot.gov 502-223-6729

KY FHWA KY FHWA DO John Ballantyne Team Leader John.ballantyne@dot.gov 502-223-6747

KY FHWA FHWA,

EFLHD

Jacinda Russell Access Program Manager Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov 571-434-1543

KY FHWA FHWA,

EFLHD

Lewis Grimm Planning Team Leader Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov 703-404-6289

KY LPA Kentucky

Association

of Counties

Todd Ruckel Executive Director,

Kentucky County Judge 

Executive Association 

Todd.Ruckel@kcjea.org 502-223-5293

KY FLMA NPS Kent Cochran Southeast FLTP Coordinator Kent_Cochran@nps.gov 404-507-5725

KY FLMA NPS Bruce Cardwell FLTP Engineer Bruce_Cardwell@nps.gov 402-661-1716

KY FLMA FWS Jo Ann Clark Regional Transportation 

Coordinator

JoAnn_Clark@fws.gov 404-679-4114

KY FLMA FWS Nathan Beauchamp USFWS Transportation 

Program Analyst

nathan_beauchamp@fws.gov 703-358-2205

KY FLMA USFS Paul Morgan Transportation System

Operations

paul.a.morgan@usda.gov 703-347-1624

KY FLMA DOD (nonUSACE)Douglas Briggs Senior Engineer/HNDSDDCTEADouglas.e.briggs.civ@mail.mil 618-220-5229

KY FLMA DOD 

(USACE)

Jeff Defosse Natural Resources Program

Manager

Jeff.A.Defosse@usace.army.mil 513-684-3192
# EUR-Lex - 32005R1784 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005R1784

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1784/2005 of 28 October 2005 fixing the maximum aid for concentrated butter for the 345th special invitation to tender opened under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 429/90 **

*
Official Journal L 288 , 29/10/2005 P. 0022 - 0022 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1784/2005

of 28 October 2005

fixing the maximum aid for concentrated butter for the 345th special invitation to tender opened under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 429/90

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products [1], and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Commission Regulation (EEC) No 429/90 of 20 February 1990 on the granting by invitation to tender of an aid for concentrated butter intended for direct consumption in the Community [2], the intervention agencies are opening a standing invitation to tender for the granting of aid for concentrated butter. Article 6 of that Regulation provides that in the light of the tenders received in response to each special invitation to tender, a maximum amount of aid is to be fixed for concentrated butter with a minimum fat content of 96 % or a decision is to be taken to make no award; the end-use security must be fixed accordingly.

(2) In the light of the tenders received, the maximum aid should be fixed at the level specified below and the end-use security determined accordingly.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 345th tender under the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EEC) No 429/90 the maximum aid and the end-use security are fixed as follows:

—maximum aid: | 45,5 EUR/100 kg, |

—end-use security: | 50 EUR/100 kg. |

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann Fischer Boel

Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

[2] OJ L 45, 21.2.1990, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

--------------------------------------------------