alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0 3 89 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. JOSEPH WAYNE WATERS ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 22 , 2020, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 12 2020

03/12/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0389
03/15/2013 09:55 FAX 3107256816 AWP-7

To: Company: Phone: Fax:
From: Title:

Date:

Description of item being transmitted: Hon. Richard C. Goodwin Office of Hearings, M-20 US DOT (202) 366-7536 Courtney Adolph Attornev

I 13(15113 

# _j

. Cert of**serv~ee,** Errata Sheet tn re. 

### Complaint's Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted and Motion for Decision, or in the alternative, Motion to Limit the issues at Hearing to Sanction, In the Matter of ChemSystems, Inc., FDMS No. FAA-2012-0911 FAA Docket No. TBD 

# Federal Aviation Administration

Office oftheRegional Counsel, AWP· 7.4 PO Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 Telephone: (310) 725-7128 Facsimile: (310) 725-6816 Email: Courtney.Adolph@faa.gov Facsimile

Total Number ofpages including the covetpage: 2

D PER YOUR REQUEST 0 FOR YOUR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT

D FOR COORDINATION 0 HARD COPY TO FOLLOW VIA US MAIL NOTES/COMMENTS:

cc: HearingDocketClerk, AGC-430 (B:ard copy to follow inthe U.S. mail) (202) 493-5142 RobertFling, Esq. (Respondent's Counsel) 

### (Hru:d copy to follow in the U.S. mail) (281) 727-0082 141001/002



# 0 U.S. 

### Depart""'"' ofTronnpo1'131lon03/15/2013 09:55 FAX 3107256816 AWP-7



### ERRATASliEET (Issued to correct the method ofservice to the Hearing Docket Clerk) 

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that onthis date I sent viaUnited States mail, postage prepaid, the executed original and one copy, as well as one copy by facsimile, ofthe COMPLAINANT'S i\10TION TO DEEM ALLEGATIONS ADMITTEDAND MOTIONFORDECISION, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO LIMIT ISSUES AT HEARING TO SANCTTON, addressed as follows: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC .20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 Facsimile: (202) 493-5142 Andby facsimile only to: Ron. Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., 

## s.E. East Building Gro1md Floor, Room El2-230 Washington, D.C. 20590 Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 1{/] 002/002

I further certifY that on this date I sent viafacsimile and certified mail, postage prepaid, a true copy ofthe COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO DEEMALLEGATIONS ADMITTED AND MOTION FORDECISION, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO UMITISSUES AT HEARING TO SANCTION, addressed as follows:

Dated: March 15,2013

# (~k Antonia Garcia, Paralegal ChemSystems, Inc. c/o RobertFling, Esq. S. RobertFling, PLLC P.O. Box411, Katy, TX 77492 Facsimile: (281) 727-0082

Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal AviationAdministration \Vestern-Pacific Region Lawndale, California 

### 7
# October 2008 -December 2011
o

 

 

 

**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Balanced Fund, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| July 1, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark |
|--------------|---------------------|
|         | Michael G. Clark    |
|         | President           |
|         | DWS Balanced Fund   |

 

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Balanced Fund, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| July 1, 2009 | /s/Paul Schubert                      |
|--------------|---------------------------------------|
|         | Paul Schubert                         |
|         | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|         | DWS Balanced Fund                     |
#### STATE v. A. J. BRANNEN, Jinnie R. Moore, L. E. Hatcher, and Gene Van Aernam.

No. 38239.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### Walter H. MARSH, Sr., Administrator of George Edward Marsh, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 4082.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 23, 1936.

Levin Nock Davis, of Accomac, Va., Robert H. McNeill, of Washington, D. C., and William P. Boehmer, of Norfolk, Va., for appellant.

Sterling Hutcheson, U. S. Atty., of Richmond, Va., Russell T. Bradford, Sp. Atty., Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Norfolk, Va., and Julius C. Martin, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, D. C.

PER CURIAM.

Case dismissed under rule 20 in accordance with stipulation of attorneys.
EPA Presentation on Regs at USWAG Tanks Subcommittee Meeting

February 28, 2012

EPA Staff attended the Utilities Solid Waste Activities Group (USWAG) Tanks subcommittee 

meeting. EPA presented an overview of the proposed changes to the UST regulations. The 

discussion focused on walkthough inspections, definitions of what is a UST system, operator 

training, and what wastewater treatment tanks will be fully regulated under the proposal.

EPA Attendees:

Carolyn Hoskinson, OUST

Paul Miller, OUST

Liz McDermott, OUST

USWAG Attendees: 

Ed Aiken, Pepco Holdings 

Rich Bozek, EEI 

Lauren Casey, Oncor Electric Delivery

Nancy Clancy, San Diego Gas & Electric 

Paula Coker, TVA 

Corey Giles, FirstEnergy 

Brian Henk, KCP&L 

Rhonda Herzog, Duke Energy

Melissa Horton, Southern Company

Carolyn Hoskinson, EPA 

Michael Lauro, National Grid 

Lawrence Liden, Constellation Energy

Fariba Mahvi, Pepco Holdings 

Kyle Manning, Progress Energy

Liz McDermott, EPA 

Paul Miller, EPA 

Mike Miller, Entergy

Tony Morse, Alliant Energy

Angela Nealen, Constellation Energy

Tim Nelson, SCANA Services 

Gayle Novak, USWAG 

David Price, Tri-State Generation and Transmission 

Jim Puckett, Dominion 

James Rachwal, DTE Energy

Patrick Renshaw, PPL Corp. 

Jim Roewer, USWAG 

Jeff Spillyards, Entergy Services 

Mark Wannemueller, Vectren 

Aaron Wallisch, Venable LLP 

William Weissman, Venable LLP 
USWAG Teleconference Participants: 

Kieran Brown, PSEG 

Brad Burke, Southern Co. 

Allison Castronovo, WE Energies 

Bud Chamlin, Ameren 

Michael Cullen, PSEG 

David Dakin, Rochester Gas & Electric 

Jeffrey Davis, NRG Energy

Eric Dessen, Con Ed 

Valentine Ejiofor, AEP 

Coleen Fleming, Oncor 

Tim George, Alabama Power Co. 

Mark Gerlach, Xcel Energy

Michael Grazioli, Exelon-ComEd 

Elizabeth Hellman, WE Energies 

Matthew Hodge, APS 

George Horvat, PECO Energy

Jim Klosterbuer, Alliant 

Roy Koster, Central Maine 

Jim Kudlinski, Salt River Project 

Mark Landin, SCE 

Dwight Little, Duke Energy

Ernie Luxton, Oncor 

Lance Martin, Exelon 

Anke Neumann, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. 

Terry Newman, SCANA 

Jill Parker-Witt, AEP 

Mark Passarini, SCE 

Cheri Peifer, Exelon 

Leo Quinn, PS Company of New Hampshire 

Karen Reese, FirstEnergy Corp. 

Dear Schramm, Wabash Valley

Shirley Scharff, Integrys Energy Group 

Kevin Schroeder, NRG Energy

Owen Schwartz, Duke Energy

Frank Skomorucha, GenOn 

Bob Stafford, Progress Energy

Rick Stemhoff, WE Energies 

Alan Wood, AEP 

Jeff Yockey, Tucson Electric Power
#### George A. WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44981.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 8, 1974.

Rehearing Denied April 9, 1974.

Certiorari dismissed.
# L_2005254EN.01003801.xml

| 30.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 254/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 254/38

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1589/2005

of 29 September 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 27 September 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 27 September 2005.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 27 September 2005, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 13,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1239/2005 (OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p. 32).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3267 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 323
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3267

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 410 Dakota Avenue South in Huron, South Dakota, as the ``First 
        Lieutenant Thomas Michael Martin Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 9, 2023

 Mr. Rounds (for himself and Mr. Thune) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            February 6, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 410 Dakota Avenue South in Huron, South Dakota, as the ``First 
        Lieutenant Thomas Michael Martin Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT THOMAS MICHAEL MARTIN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 410 Dakota Avenue South in Huron, South Dakota, shall be 
known and designated as the ``First Lieutenant Thomas Michael Martin 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Lieutenant Thomas Michael Martin Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 323

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3267

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 410 Dakota Avenue South in Huron, South Dakota, as the ``First 
        Lieutenant Thomas Michael Martin Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 6, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
EXHIBIT 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                           ---------------------------


1.       IDC Acquisition Sub, Inc., a New York corporation

2.       Wilkinson Company, Inc., an Ohio corporation

3.       Hesco Sales Inc., a Florida corporation

4.       United Truck and Body Corporation, a Florida corporation-subsidiary
           of Hesco

5.       Hesco Export Inc., a Florida corporation

6.       BesPac Inc., a South Carolina corporation

7.       DeVivo Industries Inc., a Connecticut corporation

8.       Ecological Technologies Inc., a Connecticut corporation

9.       KE Corporation, a Delaware corporation

10.      American Gooseneck Inc., an Arizona corporation

11.      Acme Chute Company, Inc., a Florida corporation

12.      Recycltech Limited, an Ontario corporation

13.      DII Acquisition Corp., a Connecticut corporation
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

09-21-00189-CR

09-21-00190-CR

________________

JOANNE SCHIWART, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 18-29721 and 18-29722

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to plea bargain agreements, appellant Joanne Schiwart pleaded 

guilty to forgery and credit card or debit card abuse. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 

32.21; 32.31(b)(1)(A). In cause number 18-29721, the trial court found the evidence 

sufficient to find Schiwart guilty of forgery but deferred further proceedings and 

placed Schiwart on community supervision for five years. In cause number 18-29722

the trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Schiwart guilty of credit card or 
2

debit card abuse but deferred further proceedings and placed Schiwart on community 

supervision for two years.

Subsequently, prior to the expiration of the terms of community supervision, 

the State filed motions to revoke Schiwart’s community supervision. In both cases, 

Schiwart pleaded “true” to violating certain terms of the community supervision 

order. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found the evidence 

was sufficient in both cases to find that Schiwart violated those terms of her

community supervision. In cause number 18-29721, the trial court revoked 

Schiwart’s community supervision, found Schiwart guilty of forgery, and assessed 

punishment at five years of confinement. In cause number 18-29722, the trial court 

revoked Schiwart’s community supervision, found Schiwart guilty of credit card or 

debit card abuse, and assessed punishment at two years of confinement. The trial 

court ordered the sentences to run concurrently.

Schiwart’s appellate counsel filed Anders briefs that present counsel’s 

professional evaluation of the records and conclude the appeals are frivolous. See 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1978). On August 2, 2021, we granted an extension of time for Schiwart 

to file pro se briefs and notified her of the deadline for doing so. We received no 

response from Schiwart in either case.
3

We have reviewed the appellate records, and we agree with counsel’s 

conclusion that no arguable issues support the appeals. Therefore, we find it 

unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeals. Cf. Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s 

judgments.1

AFFIRMED.

 ________________________________

CHARLES KREGER 

 Justice

 

Submitted on February 23, 2022

Opinion Delivered April 20, 2022

Do Not Publish

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.

1 Schiwart may challenge our decision in these cases by filing a petition for 

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
pH of the PMNNCS in Water A5% (w/w) solution

of the PMN NCS

substance

(52% NCS in aqueous

sodium hydroxide)

wasmade and the pH measured

with an Orion

pH meter. The meter

was calibrated

with a pH4, pH7, and pH 10 buffer before

analysis.

The pH of the PMN NCS at 23"C is 12.2.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28716]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0222]

Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Cemetery System, Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(44 U.S.C., 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the National 
Cemetery System (NCS), Department of Veterans Affairs, has submitted 
the collection of information abstracted below to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA submission 
describes the nature of the information collection and its expected 
cost and burden; it includes the actual data collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF THE SUBMISSION CONTACT: Ron 
Taylor, Information Management Service (045A4), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8015 
or FAX (202) 273-5981. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0222.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title and Form Number: Application for Standard Government 
Headstone or Marker for Installation in a Private or State Veterans' 
Cemetery, VA Form 40-1330.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0222.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: The form is used by the public to apply for the benefit 
of Government-provided headstones or markers for unmarked graves of 
eligible veterans in accordance with Title 38, U.S.C., Section 906. It 
is the source of information used to evaluate the applicant's claim for 
the benefit.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on August 7, 1997 at pages 42626-42627.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; State, Local or Tribal 
Government.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 85,000 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 340,000.
    Send comments and recommendations concerning any aspect of the 
information collection to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Allison Eydt, OMB 
Human Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 
10235, Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-4650. Please refer to ``OMB 
Control No. 2900-0222'' in any correspondence.

    Dated: October 7, 1997.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Barbara Epps,
Management Analyst, Information Management Service.
[FR Doc. 97-28716 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00469

- CV

In re Amin Al

- Ahmad, M.D., and Texas Cardiac Arrythmia, PLLC

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

_______________________ ___________________

Gisela D. Triana , Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Trian a an d Kelly

Filed: September 24 , 2 021