alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Platte Valley Bank 

1212 Circle Drive 

P. 0. Box 2308 

Scottsbluff, NE 69363-2308 

Phone: 308-632-7004 

Fax: 308-635-7405 

October 29, 2014 

United States Department of Transportation 

Attn: Mr. Michael F. Martin 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Martin, 

Website: www.pvbank.com 

.; : 

--

Pi/Iqe ;V(lll~y qompanies 

MEMBERS FDIC 

. ·,_ 

NEBRASKA: Scottsbluff • Morrill • Minatare • Bridgeport 

WYOMING: Torrington • Wheatland • Casper 

Email: info@pvbank.com 

This letter is in reference to a pending Essential Air Service bid for the Western Nebraska Regional 

Airport. I attended the public meeting of the Western Nebraska Regional Airport Authority Board on the 

morning of October 22"d. At the meeting, the four submitted bids were reviewed and an extensive gathering of 

public input took place. After all of the questions had been answered and comments considered, the Airport 

Authority Board voted to accept the Essential Air Service bid of Aerodynamics, Inc. 

I strongly support the Board's selection of Aerodynamics, Inc. to provide air services for our 

community. This support is based primarily on the need for our Airport to have a service provider that can 

provide reliable and cost effective airline services to passengers travelling to and from the area. 

In relation to reliability, I have had many personal experiences with individuals encountering significant 

difficulties traveling to and from our area for prospective business activities. This is due to the extremely high 

frequency of cancelled flights in 2013 and 20 14 by the current EAS provider. These cancellations have resulted 

in our community having very low confidence that they will be able to reach their destination in a timely and 

reliable manner using the current EAS provider. With their dedicated plane and new commitment to our region, 

I believe that Aerodynamics, Inc. can help to reestablish the t'eliability of air travel to and from Scottsbluff. 

The cost effectiveness of our EAS provider is also a reason for my support. We are approximately 210 

miles from the Denver International Airport so it is critical to have a service provider that can realistically price 

flights to and from Scottsbluff. Based on th~ information shared by Aerodynamics, Inc. at the public meeting I 

believe that the cost structure they will have in place will be very reasonable with a good likelihood of 

increasing the.volume of passengers significantly over time. 

In summary, based on the information, questions, and comments made at the recent public meeting I 

fully support the Western Nebraska Regional Airport Authority Board's selection of Aerodynamics, Inc. as their 

EAS provider. I hope that you will see fit to confirm the selection of that company for our local EAS provider 

to improve the reliability and cost effectiveness of air services to and from our community. Please feel free to 

contact me if you have any questions. 

~#-- Chief Operating Officer
<PAGE>
<PAGE>          95
                             CHATWINS GROUP, INC.
                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
              (In thousands, except ratios and interest factor)

                                             YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                  -------------------------------------------
                                     1992     1993     1994     1995     1996
                                  -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
     EARNINGS:
Income before income taxes, 
  equity loss, extraordinary 
  item and cumulative effect of 
  change in accounting principle  $ 3,299  $ 1,383  $ 1,810  $ 5,646  $   363
Interest expense                    4,045    5,784    8,123    9,236    8,927
Equity in loss of affiliate (3)      (485)  (1,589)     (90)       -        -
Amortization of debt issuance 
  expense                             344      395      444      564      632
Interest portion of rent 
  expense (1)                         367      317      378      348      469
                                  -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
     Earnings                     $ 7,570  $ 6,290  $10,665  $15,794  $10,391
                                  =======  =======  =======  =======  =======

     FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                  $ 4,045  $ 5,784  $ 8,123  $ 9,236  $ 8,927
Amortization of debt issuance 
  expense                             344      395      444      564      632
Interest portion of rent 
  expense (1)                         367      317      378      348      469
                                  -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
     Fixed charges                $ 4,756  $ 6,496  $ 8,945  $10,148  $10,028
                                  =======  =======  =======  =======  =======

RATIO (2)                            1.59        -     1.19     1.56     1.04
                                  =======  =======  =======  =======  =======

(1) - Interest portion of rent expense is calculated as follows: 

Rent expense                      $ 1,102  $   953  $ 1,135  $ 1,044  $ 1,407
Portion deemed representative
   of interest                       33.3%    33.3%    33.3%    33.3%    33.3%
                                  -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
Interest portion of rent expense  $   367  $   317  $   378  $   348  $   469
                                  =======  =======  =======  =======  =======

(2) - Additional income from continuing operations of $206 would be necessary
to attain a ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 1.00 for the year ended
December 31, 1993.

(3) - Equity in loss of affiliate relates to the Company's 49% investment in
CGII.  The Company indirectly services CGII's debt as its debt is owed to the
Company.  Accordingly, the Company's share of CGII's results are deducted from
earnings for the purpose of determining the ratio of earnings to fixed
charges.
No. 9680.

#### Cable et al. *v.*The Pennsylvania Co. et al.

(Decided November 20, *1906.)*

Error to Circuit Court of Jefferson County.

*Mr. Henry Gregg*and *Mr. P. P. Lewis,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Carey & Mullins,*for defendants in error.

*596Judgment affirmed.

Price, Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28741]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Receipt of Application for Endangered Species Permit

    The following applicants have applied for permits to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.):

PRT-835659

Applicant: Annette Y. Taylor, Dial Cordy, Wetland and Environmental 
Services, Inc., Wilmington, North Carolina

    The applicant requests authorization to take (salvage dead shells, 
and harass during surveys) the dwarf wedge mussel, Alasmidonta 
heterodon, and the Tar River spinymussel, Elliptio steinstansana, 
throughout their ranges in North Carolina, for the purpose of 
enhancement of survival of the species.

PRT-801592

Applicant: Kent S. Karriker, CZR Incorporated, Wilmington, North 
Carolina.

    The applicant requests authorization to take (salvage dead shells, 
and harass during surveys) the dwarf wedge mussel, Alasmidonta 
heterodon, and the Tar River spinymussel, Elliptio steinstansana, 
throughout their ranges in North Carolina, for the purpose of 
enhancement of survival of the species. This is a renewal and 
modification of previously authorized activities.
    Written data or comments on these applications should be submitted 
to: Regional Permit Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 
Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30345. All data and 
comments must be received by December 1, 1997.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, 1875 Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30345 
(Attn: David Dell, Permit Biologist). Telephone: 404/679-7313; Fax: 
404/679-7081.

    Dated: October 22, 1997.
H. Dale Hall,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 97-28741 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28915]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF STATE
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Renewal of Treatment on Government Procurement of Products From 
Countries Designated Under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act

    Under the authority delegated to me by the President in section 1-
201 of Executive Order 12269 of December 31, 1980, I hereby direct that 
products of countries listed below, designed by the President as 
beneficiaries under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (19 
U.S.C. 2701, et. seq.), shall continue to be treated as eligible 
products for purpose of section 1-101 of Executive Order 12260 until 
September 30, 1998. Such treatment shall not apply to products 
originating in these countries that are excluded from duty free 
treatment under 19 U.S.C. 2703(b). Subsequent renewal of this treatment 
beyond September 30, 1998, will be subject to beneficiaries' 
participation and cooperation in the World Trade Organization (WTO) 
Working Group on Transparency in Government Procurement, efforts they 
make to accede to the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement or to 
support continuing multilateral negotiations in the WTO in the future 
and their participation in the Free Trade Area of the Americas Working 
Group on Government Procurement. Countries making significant efforts 
to comply with these conditions will be considered for future multiple-
year renewals of preferential procurement status.
Charlene Barshefsky,
United States Trade Representative.
List of Countries Designated as Beneficiary Countries for Purpose of 
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (CBERA)
Antigua and Barbuda
Aruba
Bahamas, The
Barbados
Belize
Costa Rica
Dominica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Nicaragua
Panama
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Trinidad and Tobago
Montserrat
Netherland Antilles
Saint Kitts-Nevis
Vigin Islands, British

[FR Doc. 97-28915 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Peter Leitch, Chief Executive Officer of Rouge Resources Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 14, 2016





/s/  Peter Leitch

Peter Leitch,

Chief Executive Officer
TOMMY WELLS

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,
Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CA SE NO. 1D 17

- 1408

Opinion filed August 10, 2017.

Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

.
Douglas A Dorsey, Jacksonville

, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahass ee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed a belated

appeal from the February 18, 2016, judgments and sentences in Nassau County Circuit

Court case numbers 2010CF86, 2010CF87, 2010CF89, 2010CF91, 2010CF92,2 2015CF541, and 2015CF637. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this

opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of

appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). If petitioner qualifi es for appointed counsel,

the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent petitioner on appeal.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
June 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Varian, Inc.



Dated: August 8, 2007



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|/S/ G. EDWARD MCCLAMMY                                                         
|G. Edward McClammy Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2 – CFO
Certification








ROYAL INVEST INTERNATIONAL
CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADDED BY


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Invest
International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Nathan Lapkin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.





By: /s/ Nathan
Lapkin


Nathan
Lapkin


Chief
Financial Officer





August
19, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2005234EN.01000601.xml

| 10.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 234/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 234/6

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1474/2005

of 9 September 2005

determining the extent to which applications for import rights lodged in respect of the quota for live bovine animals of a weight exceeding 160 kg and originating in Switzerland, provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1218/2005, can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1218/2005 of 28 July 2005 laying down detailed rules for the application of an import tariff quota for live bovine animals of a weight exceeding 160 kg and originating in Switzerland provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1182/2005 (2), and in particular in the first sentence of Article 4(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1218/2005 fixes at 2 300 head the quantity of the quota in respect of which Community importers can lodge an application for import rights in accordance with Article 3 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1218/2005 fixes at 2 300 head the quantity of the quota in respect of which Community importers can lodge an application for import rights in accordance with Article 3 of that Regulation.

| (2) | Since the import rights applied for exceed the available quantity referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1218/2005, a unique reduction coefficient should be fixed for quantities tendered, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Since the import rights applied for exceed the available quantity referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1218/2005, a unique reduction coefficient should be fixed for quantities tendered,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Each application for import rights lodged in accordance with Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1218/2005 shall be accepted at a rate of 74,074 % of the import rights applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 September 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 199, 29.7.2005, p. 39.

2

---
Residential Furnaces and Boilers

RETAIL PRICES, MARKUPS AND

INSTALLATION COST

Mark Kendall

(kendall .mark@adlittle . com)

Arthur D. Little, Inc.

U.S. DOE Workshop on Standards

for Residential Furnaces and Boilers

July 17, 2001

WAS Residential Furnaces/Boilers Retail, Markups and Installation Costs fmwk doc wkshp

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02HH
Market Assessment

overview

Retail prices and installation costs at various efficiency levels are neede d

to estimate consumer life cycle costs.

Retail Price

Installation

Cost

Life Cycle Cost Analysis

How will standards impact equipment price, installation cost (and

maintenance/service costs)?

What are the drawbacks, if any, of inferring equipment retail

prices by applying a series of markups to our production cost

estimates?

® Given that the equipment price is just one component of the

price of the installed system, is it likely that information gathered

through a survey could help determine retail prices or markups?

WAS Residential Furnaces/Boilers Retail, Markups and Installation Costs fmwk doc wkshp 1

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02HH
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No s

. 22

- 1 85 C
(Filed: March 31, 2022 )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

***************************************

NAVTEJ SINGH

, *

*
Plaintiff, *

*

v. *

*
THE UNITED STATES, *

*

Defendant. *

*

***************************************

ORDER

M r

. Navtej Singh , proceeding pro se , filed this civil action against the United
States of America. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must either pay $402.00 in fees

— a $350.00 filing fee plus a $52.00 administrative fee

— or request authorization to proceed without prepayment of fees by submitting a signed
application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

M r

. S ingh submitted h is complaint without the filing fees or a completed IFP
application. In an order dated February 2 4 , 202 2 , this Court ordered M r

. Singh to either pay the $402.00 in required fees or submit an IFP application within thirty
days. See Order (ECF 6). To date , M r

. Singh has failed to comply with this Court’s
previous order.

This Court may dismiss a case for failure to prosecute when the plaintiff “fails ... to comply with these rules or a court order.” RCFC 41(b). Here, Plaintiff’s failure
to comply with an order directing him to pay the filing fee or establish grounds for
proceeding in forma pauperis justifies dismissal. See, e.g.

, Bryant v. United States

, 618 F. App’x 683, 686 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (“If a party fails to pay the requisite filin g fee,
despite adequate notice and ample opportunity to do so, the Claims Court acts within its discretion when it dismisses the action.”). As a result, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Rule 41 of the Rules of the U nited

States Court of Federal Claims.- 2

-

The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED

. s/ Stephen S. Schwartz

STEPHEN S. SCHWARTZ
Judge