alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John AMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-463.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs filed by counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, appellant having failed to file a brief in his own behalf within the time previously allowed by this Court, it is our conclusion that no reversible error has been demonstrated in the proceedings below. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence imposed thereon is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-621.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and POLAND 

Signed at Warsaw June 21, 2010 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
POLAND 

 Defense: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Warsaw June 21, 2010; 

 Entered into force June 21, 2010.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00444-CV

VIRGILIO PEÑA

v.

NEXT HOME RGV REALTY, LLC AND VERONICA L. ONTIVEROS

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CL-21-3711-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal will be taxed against the 

party incurring the same.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 19, 2023
No. 9610.

#### Smith *v.*Patterson, a Taxpayer, et al.

(Decided November 13, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Columbiana County.

*Messrs. Billingsley, Clark & DeFord,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Smith & Lones,*for defendants in error.

Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error. ' •

Shauck, C. J., Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
(Safer Roads Ahead)

 ( [AGENCY NAME])Local Road SAFETY Plan

# Kick-off Meeting

Date and Time: [INSERT DATE AND TIME]

Location: [INSERT MEETING LOCATION & ADDRESS]

1. Welcome remarks by LRSP Coordinator or Champion

2. Introductions

3. What is a Local Road Safety Plan – Presentation outlining what a Local Road Safety Plan is and how developing one can benefit [INSERT AGENCY NAME].

4. Identify other agencies or individuals who should be invited to join the working group.

5. Summarize Data Analysis – An initial data analysis has been conducted prior to this meeting to provide the group with background information on a variety of potential safety issues in [INSERT AGENCY NAME].

6. Begin Identifying Emphasis Areas for the Plan

a. Education

b. Enforcement

c. Engineering

d. Emergency Services

7. Next Meeting – Schedule a date for a follow-up meeting

Meeting Contact: [INSERT PHONE NUMBER & EMAIL FOR MEETING ORGANIZER]

# image6.png

# image1.png

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.png

# image5.png
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Geosciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meetings:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Geosciences (1756).
    Date and Time: November 18-20, 1997; 8:30 am to 5:30 pm each 
day.
    Place: National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Mesa 
Laboratory, Damon Room, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Mrs. Jewel C. Prendeville, Program Coordinator 
for the UCAR and Lower Atmosphere Facilities Oversight Section, 
Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Room 775, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone (703) 
306-1521.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide and make recommendations 
concerning the renewal proposal of the five year Cooperative 
Agreement from the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research 
(UCAR) for the management and operation of the National Center for 
Atmospheric Research (NCAR).
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the renewal proposal for the five 
year Cooperative Agreement from the University Corporation for 
Atmospheric Research (UCAR) for the management and operation of the 
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR).
    Reason for Closing: The proposal being reviewed includes 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data; such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposal. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 27, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-28803 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit (4)(b)(v)



Exhibit (4)(b)(v) 
 
GE LIFE AND ANNUITY ASSURANCE COMPANY 
JOINT ANNUITANT ENDORSEMENT 
 

 
The Contract to which this endorsement is attached is amended by deleting The Annuitant
provision and replacing it with the following: 
 
The Annuitant

 
Except for non-natural Owners, you must be an Annuitant. You may name
a Joint Annuitant if the Joint Annuitant is your spouse and is also named primary beneficiary. The Annuitant(s) cannot be changed without our consent. If there is a non-natural Owner, the Annuitant(s) cannot be changed and a Joint Annuitant cannot
be added or removed. 
 
For GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company,

 
/s/    PAMELA S. SCHUTZ 
Pamela S. Schutz 
        President
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-407 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and HUNGARY 

Signed at Budapest February 4, 2010 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
HUNGARY 

Scientific Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Budapest February 4, 2010; 

 Entered into force April 7, 2010. 

 With annexes.
#### Edward John SIRECI, Appellant, v. Jo Ann SIRECI, Appellee.

No. 73-67.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 27, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Louis Weissing, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Dyax Corp.**

**Subsidiaries of theCompany**

| **NAME**            | ** ** | ** **         | ** ** | **PARENT**  | ** ** | **STATE OR COUNTRY OF  INCORPORATION** | ** ** |
|---------------------|------------|--------------------|------------|-------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Dyax Holdings  B.V. |       | Dyax  Corp.        |       | Netherlands |       |
| Dyax B.V.           |       | Dyax Holdings B.V. |       | Netherlands |       |
| Dyax S.A.           |       | Dyax Corp.         |       | Belgium     |       |

 

----
During a visit to Glacier National Park the first week of August we drove in to Many 

Glacier Lodge. I noticed en route that we passed a survey crew.... On our return trip, we 

stopped for a brief time to talk with...Steve Dill, a very pleasant and friendly individual. I 

introduced myself and my niece as we chatted for a few minutes. Steve told us that he was 

keeping one eye on a bear up on the hillside adjacent to where he was working and the other 

eye on his work. We were pleased to meet Steve and enjoyed our short conversation....

Since I was raised in West Glacier and Kalispell, I have always had an interest in the 

Going to the Sunhighway. I remember when the road was first opened from upper Lake 

McDonald to Logan Pass in the early 1930’s. Two years later the tunnel on the east entrance 

was completed and the entire route was opened.

.... the bear on the hillside, brought back old memories. In the fall of 1941 I was 

assigned to a survey crew at Cold Bay on the Alaska Peninsula. We had brown bear to contend 

with throughout the area. Fortunately we never encountered any aggressive ones but did on 

several occasions reverse our direction to avoid them. 

Ray Westby
Cyber Physical Systems 

Surface Transportatio

NSF Transportation CPS

January 23, 2014
Presentation Outline

• Government Interests

– Safety, mobility, environment

• Government orientation• Need for cooperationJanuary 23, 2014 NSF 2014 National Workshop on Transportation CPS
CPS Impact

• Safety

– Avoid crashes (time between 

crashes), reduce crash severity

• Mobility

– Improve system reliability

• Environment

– Decrease energy, natural 

resource needs

January 23, 2014 NSF 2014 National Workshop on Transportation CPS 
CPS Orientation

Government

System 

development, 

operations

Data 

Purveyors

Traveler 

information, 

mapping

ManufacturersVehicles, system, components

January 23, 2014 NSF 2014 National Workshop on Transportation CPS
CPS Paths

Connected systems Automation

January 23, 2014 NSF 2014 National Workshop on Transportation CPS 
Connected Systems

• New Data• New Communications

– V2X, V2V– DSRC, Cellular, etc.

• Enabling Technologies

– Localization and mapping– Extended situational awareness

January 23, 2014 NSF 2014 National Workshop on Transportation CPS
Assessing Performance

• Massive New Data

– Roadside sensors– Vehicle based sensors

• Predictive Modeling

– Actionable information

• Control

– From macro to micro

January 23, 2014 NSF 2014 National Workshop on Transportation CPS
Human Behavior

• Shared Control

– Human-in-the-loop– Driver monitoring

• Test beds

– Driving simulators– Controlled courses– Naturalistic driving– Hybrid

January 23, 2014 NSF 2014 National Workshop on Transportation CPS
January 23, 2014 NSF 2014 National Workshop on Transportation CPS

Government Research

• Continued Focus on Connected 

Infrastructure and Vehicle Systems

– Enabling technologies– Scaling cyber physical systems– Testing and evaluation

• Future Focus on Systems for 

Assessing Performance

– Infrastructure asset monitoring and 

control
January 23, 2014 NSF 2014 National Workshop on Transportation CPS

FHWA EAR Program www.fhwa.dot.gov/advancedresearchFHWA Saxton Transportation Operations Laboratorywww.fhwa.dot.gov/research/tfhrc/labs/operations/USDOT ITS JPOwww.its.dot.gov/testbed.htmDavid Kuehn, Program Manager(202) 493-3414 or david.kuehn@dot.gov

Thank You
#### Arthur CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-883.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 16, 1971.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Frank H. White, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

*329Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty., Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration and this cause having been orally argued before the court, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52331-52332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-780-000]


Paiute Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

October 1, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 26, 1997, Paiute Pipeline Company 
(Paiute), P.O. Box 94197, Las Vegas, Nevada 89193-4197, filed in Docket 
No. CP97-780-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205, 157.211 and 
157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.205, 157.211 and 157.212) for approval to construct and operate 
a delivery tap for the transportation and delivery of natural gas to 
Winnemucca Farms, Inc. (Winnemucca), under Paiute's blanket certificate 
issued in Docket Nos. CP84-739-000, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the 
Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth in the request which 
is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Paiute proposes to construct and operate a new delivery tap at a 
point on Paiute's Elko Lateral facilities in Humboldt County, Nevada. 
Paiute states that it has been informed by Winnemucca that it intends 
to construct a small diameter pipeline to extend from its plant to the 
proposed new delivery tap on Paiute's Elko Lateral. Paiute asserts that 
it will provide

[[Page 52332]]

interruptible transportation service directly to Winnemucca at the 
proposed delivery point. Paiute further asserts that the estimated 
annual peak day volumes to be delivered to Winnemucca at the proposed 
delivery point will be 438,000 Mcf and 2,000 Mcf, respectively. Paiute 
indicates that it will be reimbursed by Winnemucca for the total cost 
of constructing the delivery point facilities.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, 
the proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26475 Filed 10-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Charles Louis EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-116.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 24, 1977.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Wayne Chalu, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

The judgment and sentence, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1) Florida Statutes. *Smith v. State,*310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and McNULTY and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 12.2**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I, DanielGonzález, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of YPF S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financialreporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:April 7, 2017.
ALABAMA - AGENCY CONTACTS

AL State ALDOT Clay McBrien State Office Engineer mcbrienc@dot.state.al.us 334-242-6450

AL FHWA AL FHWA 

DO

Tammy Keeley Realty Officer tammy.keeley@dot.gov 334-274-6348

AL FHWA AL FHWA 

DO

Clint Andrews Planning & Program 

Management Team Leader

Clint.andrews@dot.gov 334-274-6346

AL LPA ACEA Chris Champion ACEA President/Henry Co.

Engineer

cchampion@henrycountyal.net 334-585-2735

AL FHWA FHWA EFL Jacinda Russell Access Program Manager Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov 571-434-1543

AL FHWA FHWA EFL Lewis Grimm Planning Team Leader lewis.grimm@dot.gov 703-404-6289

AL FLMA NPS Kent Cochran Southeast Regional

Coordinator

Kent_cochran@nps.gov 404-507-5725

AL FLMA FWS Jo Ann Clark SE Regional Transportation 

Program Manager

JoAnn_Clark@fws.gov 404-679-4114

AL FLMA FWS Nathan 

Caldwell

US Fish and Wildlife Service

Transit & Trails Coordinator

nathan_caldwell@fws.gov 703-358-2205

AL FLMA USFS Rosana Barkawi Transportation System

Development and FHWA Liaison 

Program Manager

rosanabarkawi@fs.fed.us 703-605-4509

AL FLMA USFS Paul Morgan Transportation System 

Operations- Region 8

pamorgan@fs.fed.us 404-347-1624

AL FLMA USFS Pablo Cruz Director of Engineering- Region 

8

pcruz01@fs.fed.us 404-347-7395 

AL FLMA DOD (nonUSACE)Jason Cowin Senior Engineer/HNDSDDCTEAJason.W.Cowin.civ@mail.mil 618-220-5229

AL FLMA DOD 

(USACE)

Ryan Hartwig Recreation Business Line 

Manager

Ryan.D.Hartwig@usace.army.mil 404-562-5134
#### Sinclair HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-856.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40869 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

RUBEN DE LA GARZA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12

- CR

- 1098

- 1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ruben De La Garza
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). De La Garza h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that th is opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40869 Document: 00512751056 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014No. 13

- 40869

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40869 Document: 00512751056 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.27

The form of employment agreement and form of indemnification agreement filed as
    exhibits 10.1 and 10.3 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
    the quarter ended December 31, 2004 have been executed by Mr. Mayer. The
    provisions of the agreements, as amended, are substantially identical in all
    material respects, except that Mr. Mayer is the Company's Senior Vice
    President and Chief Financial Officer, his base compensation is one hundred
    fifty thousand dollars, his severance under certain circumstances is twelve
    months, and his restrictions on competition are for twelve months.