alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[106th Congress Private Law 3]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl003.106]

Private Law 106-3
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 For <<NOTE: Dec. 3, 1999 -  [H.R. 322]>>  the relief of Suchada Kwong.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SUCHADA KWONG.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Suchada Kwong shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Suchada Kwong enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she shall be 
considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 
eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an immigrant 
visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed with 
appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Suchada Kwong, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if 
applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available 
to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 202(e) of 
such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Suchada Kwong 
shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be

accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofiParty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2004,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 10, 2004 | /s/ PATRICK  FARRELL                   |   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Patrick  Farrell                       |
|                     | President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

DRAFT

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Corrpro Companies, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-58376) on Form S-8 of Corrpro Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries (Company) of
our report dated June 17, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Corrpro Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2004, which
report appears in the March 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Corrpro
Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries.

Our report refers to changes in the methods of accounting in fiscal 2003 for
goodwill and other intangible assets.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
June 29, 2004
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

IL-04 Big Creek Road and Cache 

Chapel Road Improvements Roadway Resurfacing

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

- Cypress Creek National 

Wildlife Refuge

Pulaski County 

Highway 

Department

Pulaski 2018

IL-05 Grassy Road Roadway Resurfacing

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

- Crab Orchard National 

Wildlife Refuge

Williamson 

County Highway 

Department

Williamson 2015

IL-07 Two Rivers NWR Access 

Improvements Roadway Resurfacing

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

- Two Rivers National 

Wildlife Refuge

Calhoun County 

Unit Road District Calhoun 2018

IL-09 Marcum Branch Road Roadway Resurfacing U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers - Rend Lake

Franklin County 

Highway 

Department

Franklin 2018

IL-11 Dee Bennett Road Relocation

Preliminary Engineering 

& Environmental 

Document

U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers - Starved Rock 

Lock & Dam

LaSalle County 

Highway 

Department

LaSalle 2016

IL-13 Turner Hollow Road Roadway Resurfacing

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

- Two Rivers National 

Wildlife Refuge

Calhoun County 

Unit Road District Calhoun 2018

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Illinois Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear Program 

of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Illinois FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Illinois Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2018

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County Fiscal Year*

IL-14 Wolf Creek Rd/Old SR 13 

Intersection

Intersection 

Reconstruction

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

- Crab Orchard National 

Wildlife Refuge

IL Department of 

Transportation Williamson 2015

IL-15 Kirk Road @ Pine Street Turn Lane Construction U.S. Department of EnergyFermi Laboratory

Kane County 

Division of 

Transportation

Kane 2018

Illinois Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2018

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The Illinois PDC does not have a firm date for the next 

Call for Projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. 

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MITCHELL LEE VARNELL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

KENNETH SAWYER; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-35771 

D.C. No. 3:15-cv-05443-BHS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 2, 2020**

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. 

Mitchell Lee Varnell, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the 

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging 

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 5 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-35771 

Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Varnell

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were 

deliberately indifferent to Varnell’s serious medical needs regarding his back. See 

id. at 1057-60 (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows 

of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health; medical malpractice, 

negligence, or a difference of opinion concerning the course of treatment does not 

amount to deliberate indifference); see also Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 746 

(9th Cir. 2002) (delays in medical treatment do not constitute an Eighth 

Amendment violation unless the defendants know that “delays would cause 

significant harm”).

We do not consider documents not presented to the district court. See 

United States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief. Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Varnell’s request for appointment of counsel, set forth in the opening brief, 

is denied. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99(d)

(i) Class A-1 Certificates received distributions of principal in the aggregate
amount of $3,017,997.78 in 1997. No other Class received any distributions of
principal in 1997.

(ii) All Classes received distributions of interest in 1997.

(iii) Aggregate collections on the mortgage loans for 1997  $32,122,371.42

(iv) No delinquency advances were made in 1997.

(vii) No mortgage loan was delinquent in 1997

(ix)  Same as (ii) above.

(x) Same as (ii) above.

(xiv) The Trust Fund suffered no losses or additional expenses in 1997.

(xvii)


       Master Servicer Compensation for                  $688,588.06
       1997 (including fees paid to
       primary servicers)

       Special Servicer Compensation for                          $0
       1997
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

**Waterfowl Identification in the Central Flyway**

##       American Coot (Mud Hen, Poule D'Eau)    

----

**Sexes Identical**
****

**Body:** Medium-sized water bird not belonging to duck family     but found in close association. Sooty gray with somewhat darker head, back     and wings. White undertail coverts. Feet with lobed toes and sharp claws.     Bill whitish or ivory with red markings. Eyes red. **Wings:**     Overall sooty gray. Secondaries tipped with white. **Voice:**     Quarrelsome high-pitched *twittering.***In Flight:**     Dark body contrasts with white bill and undertail coverts. Strong but reluctant     flyer.   

----

Previous Section
Return to Contents
Next Section

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/waterfwl/coot.htm		Page Contact Information: Webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 03-Aug-2006 11:32:16 EDT		Sioux Falls, SD [sdww54]
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-37-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

October 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 20, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124-1000, filed 
a request with the Commission in Docket No. CP98-37-000, pursuant to 
Sections 157.205, and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the 
Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to install and operate a new 
delivery point, to be located in Stevens County, Kansas authorized in 
blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-401-000, all as more 
fully set forth in the request on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    Northern proposes to install and operate a new delivery point to 
accommodate natural gas deliveries to UtiliCorp United Inc. (UCU). UCU 
has requested the proposed delivery point to serve a local residential 
customer. The proposed volumes to be delivered for UCU would be 4 MMBtu 
on a peak day and 529 MMBtu on an annual basis. Northern estimates a 
cost of constructing the proposed delivery point of $6,500.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28696 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Cygne Designs, Inc. (the  Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending January 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roy E. Green, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Roy E. GreenRoy E. GreenSenior Vice President-Chief Financial OfficerMay 15, 2008
# L_2005153EN.01002301.xml

| 16.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 153/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 153/23

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 902/2005

of 15 June 2005

laying down the reduction coefficient to be applied under the Community tariff quota for barley provided for by Regulation (EC) No 2305/2003

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2305/2003 of 29 December 2003 opening and providing for the administration of a Community tariff quota for barley from third countries (2), and in particular Article 3(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 2305/2003 opened an annual tariff quota for the import of 300 000 t of barley falling within CN code 1003 00. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 2305/2003 opened an annual tariff quota for the import of 300 000 t of barley falling within CN code 1003 00.

| (2) | The quantities applied for on 13 June 2005 in accordance with Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2305/2003 exceed the quantities available. The extent to which licences may be issued should therefore be determined and a reduction coefficient laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The quantities applied for on 13 June 2005 in accordance with Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2305/2003 exceed the quantities available. The extent to which licences may be issued should therefore be determined and a reduction coefficient laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Each application for import licences for the tariff quota for barley lodged and forwarded to the Commission on 13 June 2005 in accordance with Article 3(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2305/2003 shall be accepted at a rate of 0 % of the quantity applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 June 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 342, 30.12.2003, p. 7.

2

---
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

UNPUBLISHED

In re BLOCK/NYGAARD, Minors. November 10, 2022

No. 360449

Gogebic Circuit Court

Family Division

LC Nos. 2018-000069-NA

2019-000042-NA

Before: SAWYER, P.J., and MARKEY and SWARTZLE JJ.

SWARTZLE, J. (concurring).

I concur in the majority’s judgment as well as its analysis with the exception of Section 

II.B. I do not quarrel with the majority’s application of current law; rather, my quarrel is with the 

current law itself. For the reasons I set forth in my concurring opinion in People v King, 

unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued October 15, 2020 (Docket No. 

346559) (SWARTZLE, J., concurring), p 7, I do not believe that our Court should apply the plainerror test to the waiver of counsel, either in the criminal context or this quasi-criminal context. 

Our Supreme Court has granted leave to hear oral argument on the application for this issue, People 

v King, 964 NW2d 34 (Mich, 2021), but, based on the law as it stands today, I must concur.

/s/ Brock A. Swartzle
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53626-53627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27258]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FR-5909-8]


Proposed Settlement Agreement, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as 
amended (Act), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
partial consent decree, which was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the District of Columbia by the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on September 30, 1997, to address 
a lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club. This lawsuit, which was filed 
pursuant to section 304(a) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7604(a), addresses, 
among other things, EPA's alleged failure to meet a mandatory deadline 
under section 112(n)(1)(B) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7412(n)(1)(B), which 
concerns a study of mercury emissions. The proposed partial consent 
decree provides, in part, that ``[n]o later than December 19, 1997, the 
Administrator shall sign a letter transmitting to Congress the study 
described by CAA section 112(n)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. 7412(n)(1)(B). With 
five business days thereafter, EPA shall deliver to Congress such 
letter and study.''
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication 
of this document, the Agency will receive written comments relating to 
the proposed partial consent decree from persons who were not named as 
parties or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the 
Department of Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed 
partial consent decree if the comments disclose facts or considerations 
that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, 
or inconsistent with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the 
Department of Justice determine, following the comment period, that 
consent is inappropriate, the final partial consent decree will 
establish a deadline for specific actions under section 112(n)(1)(B) of 
the Act.
    A copy of the proposed partial consent decree was lodged with the 
Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia 
on September 30, 1997. Copies are also available from Phyllis J. 
Cochran, Air and Radiation Division (2344), Office of General Counsel, 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20460, (202) 260-7606. Written comments should be sent to Patrick S. 
Chang at the address above and must be submitted on or before November 
14, 1997.


[[Page 53627]]


    Dated: October 3, 1997.
Scott C. Fulton,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-27258 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
# L_2006180EN.01002601.xml

| 4.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 180/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 180/26

---

Corrigendum to the Guideline of the European Central Bank of 17 November 2005 amending Guideline ECB/2002/7 on the statistical reporting requirements of the European Central Bank in the field of quarterly financial accounts

(ECB/2005/13)

(2006/43/EC)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 30 of 2 February 2006
  )

On page 9, in Table 3 in the second row, page 10, Table 4 in the second row and page 11, Table 5 in the second row:

for:

‘Creditor / Debtor’,

read:

‘Debtor / Creditor’.

---