alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department 

Of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration

400 Seventh St., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

June 3, 1996 

Refer to: HNG-14/SS-62 

Mr. Nick D. Calvi 

National Signpost Representative 

Western Highway Products, Inc. 

Traffic Signs and Safety Products 

10650 Fern Avenue 

Stanton, California 90680 

Dear Mr. Calvi: 

This is in response to your March 19 letter to Mr. James H. Hatton, Jr., requesting 

acceptance of your company’s Ulti-Mate telescopic square steel sign supports. In support 

of your request you included information on the geometric, chemical, and physical 

properties of the posts which indicate that they will be in reasonable close conformity 

with perforated square steel tube sign supports that we have previously found acceptable 

by virtue of full-scale crash testing. The 7/16-inch (11.1 mm) perforations punched 1-

inch (2.54-mm) on-center on all four sides are identical to those on perforated square 

steel tube breakaway sign supports previously found acceptable. 

On April 29 you provided a copy of a mill certification for the steel you intend to use in 

the fabricated tubes (ASTM A513-94, Grade 1012). The results compared favorably with 

the steel usually specified for these supports, namely the ASTM A653-94 specifications 

cited in the table below (A653 replaced the steel tube specification that was used in the 

past, namely A446.) The following table summarizes the sizes and materials you intend 

to use: 

Wall Thickness 14 Gage (2.10 mm, 0.083 in) 12 Gage (2.66 mm, 0.105 in) 

Steel (ASTM Specification) A653-94 SQ Grade 50 modified to 

“Grade 55” 

A653-94 SQ Grade 40 

Sizes (SI units) mm 44.45, 50.80, 57.15 38.10, 44.45, 50.80, 57.15, 

63.50 

Sizes (customary US units) 

inches 

1.75, 2.00, 2.25 1.50, 1.75, 2.00, 2.25, 2.50 

In addition, you requested the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) acceptance of 

several of these posts installed in a variety of configurations for use on National Highway 

System (NHS) projects. After reviewing our records of experience with similar posts we 
find that we can comply with your request. The post sizes and use conditions we will 

find acceptable for use on the NHS, if proposed by a State, are shown in the enclosed 

table. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 Seppo I. Sillan, Acting Chief 

 Federal_Aid and Design Division 

Enclosure 

Geometric and Roadside Design Acceptance letter SS-62
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANTHONY L. BILLINGER, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 08-321 Erie

v. )

)

KENNETH R. CAMERON, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on November 18,

2008, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13], filed on may

13, 2010, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be denied and that a certificate of

appealability be denied. The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of

service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on

Respondents. Petitioner filed objections on June 1, 2010 [Doc. No. 14]. After de novo

review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and

Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 28 day of June, 2010; th

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DENIED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on May 13, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:08-cv-00321-SJM-SPB Document 15 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28849]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: The Evaluation of a Community-based Intervention to 
Improve Pregnancy Outcomes and Reduced Perinatal Mortality in a 
Rural District of Balochistan, Pakistan. (Teleconference)
    Date: November 19, 1997.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. (ET)--adjournment.
    Place: Division of Scientific Review, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5E01, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Contact Person: Hameed Khan, Ph.D, Scientific Review 
Administrator, NICHD, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 6100 Building--Room 
5E01, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Telephone: 301-496-1485.
    Purpose/Agenda: To provide concept review of proposed contract 
solicitations.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(9)(B), Title 5 U.S.C. The discussion could 
reveal the specific details of future requests for contract 
proposals (RFPs), the disclosure of which would significantly 
frustrate implementation of the agency's proposed contract 
activities by giving unfair competitive advantage to private firms 
or individuals.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.864, 
Population Research and No. 93.865, Research for Mothers and 
Children], National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 27, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-28849 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 47047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19475]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, August 9, 2012, 3:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m.

PLACE: Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matters To Be Considered

    Briefing Matter: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Hazardous Magnet 
Sets.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/webcast.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: August 3, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-19475 Filed 8-3-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ROBERT GENE REGA AND JOAN MARY

REGA

v.

COMPATI HOME HEALTHCARE, LLC, JAY CINCINNATTI, NEAL LARIMER, RUTHI HOOPER, AND FLORA BENNETT

PETITION OF: ROBERT GENE REGA :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 152 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of December, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

and Motion to Quash Appeal are DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3506 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3506

 To extend and modify training for Eastern European national security 
            forces in the course of multilateral exercises.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 2023

  Mr. Peters introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend and modify training for Eastern European national security 
            forces in the course of multilateral exercises.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kosovo Defense Cooperation 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF TRAINING FOR EASTERN EUROPEAN 
              NATIONAL SECURITY FORCES IN THE COURSE OF MULTILATERAL 
              EXERCISES.

    Section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2016 (10 U.S.C. 333 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(1), by adding at the end the 
        following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) The Republic of Kosovo.''; and
            (2) in subsection (h)--
                    (A) in the first sentence, by striking ``December 
                31, 2024'' and inserting ``December 31, 2026''; and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by striking ``December 
                31, 2024.'' and inserting ``December 31, 2026''.
                                 <all>
```
#### CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY, INC. v. Ray GUIFFRIA.

No. 62073.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: Ray Guiffria applying for certiora-ri, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Tangipahoa.

Denied.
The CALMET and CALPUFF data files that were develop ed for the MT BART visibility analysis are

available from EPA on request. The data sets inclu de ascii both files and binary data files for calen dar years 2006-2008. The binary data files were develop ed and used with the Linux operating system. To request a copy of the data files, please send a 1 T erabyte (TB) hard drive formatted for Linux as ext3 or ext4 to:

Gail Tonnesen EPA Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Mail Code 8P-AR Denver, Colorado 80202
303-312-6113
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Julian .C. ANDREU, Edward R. LeCompte, and Letona LeCompte, also known as Toni LeCompte, Appellees.

No. K-304.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

May 15, 1969.

*450Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., George R. Georgieff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, Ralph W. Nimmons, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order entered by the trial court dismissing an indictment for murder in the first degree. The indictment is predicated upon the operation of the felony-murder rule as it involves the homicide of a police officer by the act of another officer occurring during the course of said officer’s efforts to apprehend appellee while the latter and his companion attempted to burglarize a residence that had been “staked out” by the former.

The facts agreed to indicate that neither the appellee nor his accomplice were known to be armed nor did they know of the presence of the officers within the residence. The record facts show that the homicide resulted from the deceased officer’s failure to adhere to the prearranged plan when he moved in the darkness in a forbidden direction intended to be “covered” by another officer. The latter, mistakenly believing the deceased to be one of the burglars, fired and mortally wounded his companion.

The trial court held in a well reasoned opinion that under the facts peculiar to the case at bar, the felony-murder rule was inapplicable.

Our consideration of the record, briefs, and oral arguments of the parties has failed to demonstrate that the order now under review is erroneous, and it is therefore

Affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
- 17 - 

Systemic In Practice – Missouri  

Missouri is one state that has been successful in identifying and

implementing systemwide improvements. Missouri’s Blueprint to Arrive Alive,

which is the State’s SHSP, identifies their “Targeted 10” strategies in education, enforcement,

engineering, and public policy areas. These strategies were selected based on documented evidence supporting their

lifesaving and injury reduction potential. Out of these 10 strategies, 5 are engineering countermeasures that are being

implemented on a systemwide basis, including the following:

 Expand the installation of shoulder and centerline rumble strips/stripes;  

 Expand, improve, and maintain roadway visibility features (pavement markings, signs, lighting, etc.);  

 Expand installation and maintenance of roadway shoulders;  

 Remove and/or shield fixed objects along roadside right of way; and  

 Improve curve recognition through the use of signs, markings, and pavement treatments.  

Missouri uses Highway Safety Improvement Program

(HSIP) funding for many of these strategies, proactively

incorporating the installation of rumble strips/stripes,

improved signing and delineation, wider pavement

markings, and improved shoulders into pavement

resurfacing projects.

Currently, Missouri focuses its HSIP funding on the State

roadway system since, historically, 77 percent of the

fatalities in Missouri occur on state roads. In order to

achieve the greatest benefit for the funds invested,

Missouri originally focused on incorporating the safety

enhancements into resurfacing projects on major

roadways (about 5,600 centerline miles) experiencing a

disproportionate 45 percent of all fatal crashes.

Following positive results from those original efforts, the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) is currently

considering incorporating two‐foot shoulders into future resurfacing projects on less traveled roadways (e.g., minor

arterials, major collectors). Missouri also has become a national leader in the installation of cable median barriers to

reduce cross‐median fatalities on the majority of the Interstate system throughout the State.  Additionally, since 2005,

Missouri has installed well over 9,600 miles of rumble strips on the major road system.

Since 2007, almost two‐thirds of Missouri’s HSIP funds have been allocated to system wide improvements. While overall

results cannot be attributed to specific safety improvements, the evidence is compelling. Between 2005 and 2011,

Missouri has seen a 37.5 percent drop in overall fatalities and a 46 percent reduction in lane departure fatalities. In

addition, since the installation of cable median barriers on the Interstate system throughout the State, there has been

an 80 percent reduction in cross‐median crash fatalities on Missouri freeways.

For more information contact:   John Miller

Traffic Safety Engineer

Missouri Department of Transportation

573‐526‐1759

E‐mail: john.p.miller@modot.mo.gov
# EUR-Lex - 32005M3718 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005M3718

**Commission Decision of 21/03/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3718 - IFIL / INTESA / MARCEGAGLIA / SVILUPPO ITALIA / SIT) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the Italian text is authentic) **

*

*

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3718 — IFIL/Intesa/Marcegaglia/Sviluppo Italia/SIT)

(2005/C 94/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

- from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

- in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3718. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

--------------------------------------------------
LETTER DATED 11/5/2002 RE: LEASE



Exhibit 10.24 
 
November 5, 2002 
 
Pegasystems Inc. 
101 Main Street 
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 
Attention: Mr. Christopher
Sullivan 
 

	  	 Re:	  	 Lease dated February 26, 1993 with NOP Riverfront LLC, as successor in interest to Riverfront Office Park Joint Venture, and Pegasystems Inc. (as amended, the
“Lease”) regarding space at 101 Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 

 

	 Dear	  	 Chris: 

 
You have advised us about a change in the anticipated schedule for Pegasystems to make tenant improvements in its space at 101 Main
Street. Paragraphs 1(e) and 1(f) of Amendment No. 8 to Agreement of Lease dated July 31, 2002 contemplate that Pegasystems would perform certain improvements and requisition the Finish Work Allowance and the Additional Allowance no later than May
16, 2004. This letter will confirm the Landlord’s agreement that (a) the May 16, 2004 outside date will apply to 20% of each such allowance, and (b) Pegasystems will requisition at least an additional 20% of each such allowance each anniversary
thereafter through May 16, 2008, provided that the Landlord reserves the right not to fund any such requisition for work in connection with any sublease or assignment (other than to a Successor as defined in Section 14.3 of the Lease). Capitalized
terms used and not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Lease. 
 
 

	  Sincerely,

	
	  /s/    SHAY SIMS
        


	  Shay Sims
  Property Manager


 
Acknowledged and Agreed: 
 

	  PEGASYSTEMS INC.

	
	  By:
	  	  /s/    CHRIS SULLIVAN


	  Chris Sullivan
  CFO


 
C:        Michael Francis
#### Nolan PLUNKETT, Appellant, v. Alice RENEAU, etc., Appellee.

No. HH-402.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 21, 1978.

John E. Crusoe, Tallahassee, for appellant.

John T. Parnham, of Parnham & Ras-muss, Pensacola, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Appellee’s motion for allowance of attorney fees on account of appellate services is provisionally granted. *Dresser v. Dresser,*350 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Sunrise Telecom Incorporated: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (File Nos. 333-125128,333-61596, 333-43270, 333-96689, 333-107471 and 333-115722) on Form S-8 of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated of our report dated April 8, 2008 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, whichreport appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated. 

 

Our report dated April 8, 2008 refers to an accounting change as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*, applying the modified prospective method at the beginning of fiscal year 2006.

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Mountain View, California 

April 8, 2008
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Sunrise Telecom Incorporated: 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-125128,333-61596, 333-43270, 333-96689, 333-107471 and 333-115722) of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated of our report dated October 31, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated and its subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which reportappears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated. 

As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financialstatements, the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2004 have been restated. 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

Mountain View,California 

October 31, 2007
Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, Pa g e 1 of 1

8/26/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3C0426DO

...
#### E. Mack LAUDERDALE and J. T. Lauderdale, Appellants, v. A. H. BLAKE, etc., et al., Appellees. Richard M. SEPLER, Appellant, v. A. H. BLAKE, etc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 76-1774, 77-387.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1977.

Sepler & Hernandez and Irma V. Hernandez, Hialeah, for appellants.

Stuart L. Simon, County Atty., and Robert Krawcheck, Asst. County Atty., for ap-pellees.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and NATHAN and KEHOE, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellants bring these consolidated appeals from two summary final judgments entered by the trial court upholding the *743denial by appellees of agricultural classification for ad valorem tax purposes of appellants’ property. In our opinion, the judgments were properly entered; therefore, they are affirmed.

Appellants’ property, as of January 1, 1974, was being used for agricultural purposes. However, during 1973 appellants sought and obtained rezoning of the property from agricultural to R-3-5 (multiple family district). The new zoning permits buildings of unlimited height containing 32 units per acre. When appellants requested an agricultural classification of their property for ad valorem tax purposes, their requests were denied pursuant to Section 193.461(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1972).

The common denominator of appellants’ points on appeal is that the trial court erred in upholding the denials of agricultural classification for ad valorem tax purposes of their property, even though they had requested and obtained, subsequent to the enactment of Section 193.461(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1972), a rezoning of the property for nonagricultural use. This Section provides in pertinent part as follows:

> “ * * * The assessor shall reclassify the following lands as nonagricultural:

> (3) Land that has been zoned to a non-agricultural use at the request of the owner subsequent to the enactment of this law;”

Based on this statutory provision and the facts in the appeals *sub judice,*we agree with the trial court that appellants’ requests for agricultural classification of their property for ad valorem tax purposes were properly denied. See *Jar Corporation v. Culbertson,*246 So.2d 144 (Fla.3d DCA 1971); and *Haines v. St. Petersburg Methodist Home, Inc.,*173 So.2d 176 (Fla.2d DCA 1965). Further, we have considered the other points raised on appeal and conclude that they are without merit. Accordingly, the summary final judgments appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.
259 La. 81

#### Angie R. LEWIS et al. v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 51549.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1971.

In re: Dr. Lynn O. Tackett and Mrs. Jannie J. Tackett applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Sabine. 247 So. 2d 635.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.