alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT We ProtectHoosiers and Our Environment.

Susan Hedman Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. Governor

Thon1as W. Easterly Commissioner

· Regional Administrator

U.S. EPA, Region 5 77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604

Dear Ms. Hedman: December 12, 2012 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317) 232-8603 Toll Free (800) 451-6027 www.idem.IN.gov

Re: Revised Request for the July 12, 2012, PM2.s New Source Review (NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Submittal

OnJuly 12, 2012, the IndianaDepartment ofEnvironmental Management (IDEM) submitted for approval regulations to address precursors to ozone and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal two and five-tenths (2.5) micrometers (PM2. 5) and**cond~nsibles** for PM2.s (#11-251). The original request was to review and approve specific citations in Indiana's newrule while taking no action onthe remainder ofthe rulemaking.

At this time, IDEM requests that U.S. EPA include the following additional citations from the PM2.5 NSRrulemaking for approval into the state implementation plan (SIP): 326 lAC 2-1.1-3(d)(2)(A) 326 lAC 2-1.1-3(e)(1)(A) 326 lAC 2-1.1-3(h)(2)(B)(xi) 326 lAC 2-2-1(f)(l) 326 lAC 2-2-1(ee)(3) 326 lAC 2-2-1(gg)(1)(C) 326 lAC 2-2-4(b)(2)(A)(vi) 326 lAC 2-2-6(b) 326 lAC 2-2-14(e) 326 lAC 5-1-5(b)(1)(E)

IDEM requests that U.S. EPA only act onthe citations listed in the original request ofJuly 12, 2012, and the citations above inthis supplemental request. In addition, the July 12, 2012, request included an incorrect citation. The citation "326 lAC 2-2-4(b)(2)(vi)" should be "326 lAC 2-2- 4(b)(2)(A)(vi)."

RecycledPaper @ An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle 

### 0Please

- contact ScottDeloney, Air Programs Branch Chief, Office ofAir Quality, at (317) 233-5694, ifyou have questions concemingthis submission.

Sincerely,

# lt**;J~ 3~6~** 

KB/cep

cc: John Mooney U.S. EPA, Region 5 PamelaBlakley, U.S. EPA, Region 5 Sam Portanova, U.S. EPA Region 5 Doug Aburano U.S. EPA, Region 5 Steve Rosenthal U.S. EPA, Region 5 Andy Chang U.S. EPA, Region 5 Scott Deloney, IDEM Christine Pedersen, IDEM SIP file Keith Baugues Assistant Commissioner, Office ofAir Quality
#### Louis Joseph SPURLING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44624.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 15, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed. 282 So.2d 882.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3
(Nos. 333-58311, 333-34645, 333-77793, 333-88671, 333-95883, 333-36982, 333-51856, 333-60500 and
333-81128), and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-113436, 333-04717, 333-34711,
333-50391, 333-92905 and 333-89764), of ProxyMed, Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2004 relating
to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Fort Lauderdale, Florida
December 14, 2004
July 31, 2013

Mr. James Whedbee

5816 NE. Buttonwood Tree Lane Gladstone, MO 64119

Dear Mr. Whedbee :

This is in response to your March 23, 2013 letter sent to the public docket ( No. FAA

- 20 13

- 0305 ) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration to amend part 71, Subpart E of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR) . The petition for rulemaking requested an

amend ment to address airspace changes resulting from the closure of certain air traffic control towers. Specifically, you request that when tower closur es are planned for a temporary period, the associated Class D airspace area would revert to a Class E surface area

.

As s tate d in your petition, the FAA was preparing to close numerous air traffic control towers at locations across the country due to budge t cuts anticipated as a result of sequestration. On May 1, 2013, Congress enacted the Red ucing Flight Delays Act of 2013 ( Pub. L. No. 113

- 9,

127 Stat. 443 ) . The Act provides the Secretary of Transportation (the Secretary) with discretion to transfer up to $253 million from funds "available for obligation in [fiscal year 2013] as discretionary grants

- in

- aid for airports pursuant to section 47117(f) of T itle 49, United States Code" or "any other program or account of the [FAA]" to "appropriations
accounts pr oviding for the operations of the [FAA]," to the extent that the Secretary determines the transfer of funds "to be necessary to prevent reduced operations and staffing of the [FAA] during fiscal year 2013 to ensure a safe and efficient air transportation s ystem" ( Pub. L. No. 113

- 9, § 2(a), (c), 127 Stat. 443

- 44 ) . On May 10, 2013, the Secretary announced that he had determined that the new legislation would allow FAA to transfer sufficient funds to continue funding the 149 contract towers, and the towers wo uld thus remain funded for the remainder of fiscal year 2013.

When the FAA responds to petitions for rulemaking, it must follow the requirements of

14 CFR part 11, particularly those guidelines for processing petitions for rulemaking found in § 11.73. As stated in that section, the FAA uses the following criteria when making a decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking:

1) the immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises; 2) the priority of other FAA issues; and2 3) the resources we have available to address these issues.

While the issues raised in your petition may have merit, they do not address an immediate safety concern

. Therefore, this request is denied

. Your comment and reasons for a rule change will be considered if the agency undertakes future rulemaking in this area. Accordingly, Docket No. FAA

- 2013

- 0305 is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ellen Crum Manager, Airspace and

Rules Team
**EXHIBIT 21**Subsidiaries of ESS Technology, Inc.**•** ESS Technology Holdings, Inc. — California **•** ESS Technology International, Inc. — Cayman Islands **•** ESS British Columbia Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as Silicon Analog Systems Corporation) — British Columbia **•** ESS (Far East) Ltd. — Hong Kong **•** ESS Technology International (Korea) Ltd. — Korea **•** ESS KK (inactive)  — Japan **•** ESS Electronics Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. — China **•** ESS Electronics Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (inactive) — China **•** Pictos Technologies, Inc. — Delaware **•** Zing Network, Inc — California **•** Zing Networks Ltd. (formerly known as Pix.com, Ltd.) — Israel **•** Divio, Inc. — California
Exhibit
31.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




I,
David Koos, Chief Executive Officer of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc.
(“Registrant”) certify that:




1. I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Registrant;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. 
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and
have:





(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






Date:
      January 30, 2009
            By:
            /s/ David
      R. KoosDavid
      R. KoosPresident and Chief Executive
      Officer
# L_2008028DE.01004001.xml

| 1.2.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 28/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 28/40

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2005/56/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 26. Oktober 2005 über die Verschmelzung von Kapitalgesellschaften aus verschiedenen Mitgliedstaaten

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 310 vom 25. November 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 310 vom 25. November 2005

Seite 9, Artikel 19 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„Die Mitgliedstaaten setzen die Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften in Kraft, die erforderlich sind, um dieser Richtlinie spätestens bis zum Dezember 2007 nachzukommen.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Mitgliedstaaten setzen die Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften in Kraft, die erforderlich sind, um dieser Richtlinie spätestens bis zum 15. Dezember 2007 nachzukommen.“

---
Exhibit 32

Certification
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of GenTek Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), William E. Redmond, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Thomas B. Testa, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

|                                                                                                                                                                 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
|                                                                                                                                                                 |  | 
|(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.

|    |                         | 
|--- | ----------------------- | 
|/s/ | William E. Redmond, Jr. | 
|    |                         | 
|    | William E. Redmond, Jr. | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | November 9, 2006        | 
|    |                         | 
|/s/ | Thomas B. Testa         | 
|    |                         | 
|    | Thomas B. Testa         | 
|    | Chief Financial Officer | 
|    | November 9, 2006        | 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to GenTek Inc. and will be retained by GenTek Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Advancedtechnology satellites in the commercial environment
v1|v2|
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:174635/V. 1-2

Item Number: 0830-H-14 (online)

CGP systemNumber:000771618
November 9, 2018
# L_2005019EN.01002601.xml

| 21.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 19/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 19/26

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 91/2005

of 20 January 2005

applying a reduction coefficient to refund certificates for goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, as provided for by Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 of 6 December 1993 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 of 13 July 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds (2), and in particular Article 8(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Member States' notifications pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 indicate that the total amount of applications received reaches EUR 220 145 448 while the available amount for the tranche of refund certificates as referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 is EUR 71 047 745. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Member States' notifications pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 indicate that the total amount of applications received reaches EUR 220 145 448 while the available amount for the tranche of refund certificates as referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 is EUR 71 047 745.

| (2) | A reduction coefficient shall be calculated on the basis of Article 8(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000. Such coefficient should therefore be applied to amounts requested in the form of refund certificates for use from 1 February 2005 as established in Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A reduction coefficient shall be calculated on the basis of Article 8(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000. Such coefficient should therefore be applied to amounts requested in the form of refund certificates for use from 1 February 2005 as established in Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The amounts for applications of refund certificates for use from 1 February 2005 are subject to a reduction coefficient of 0,678.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 January 2005.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 318, 20.12.1993, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2580/2000 (OJ L 298, 25.11.2000, p. 5).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 177, 15.7.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 886/2004 (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 14).

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as
an officer of International Fuel Technology Inc. ("IFT"), that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of IFT on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of IFT.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to IFT and will be retained by IFT and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


By: /s/ Michael F. Obertop                    Date     November 10, 2003
   ------------------------------------                -----------------
     Michael F. Obertop
     Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         929,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 955,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        239,494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       594,183
<OTHER-SE>                                    (31,452)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   955,488
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140,434
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,311
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,311
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40
        

</TABLE>
U.S. Department 

Of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration

400 Seventh St., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

September 21, 1995 

Refer to: HNG-14/SS-46A 

Mr. Vincent F. Schimmoller 

Regional Administrator (HRA-08) 

Lakewood, Colorado 

Dear Mr. Schimmoller: 

This is in response to the South Dakota’s Division Office memorandum dated September 

7 requesting FHWA acceptance of the subject sign support that was crash tested for the 

State of South Dakota. You enclosed a copy of the report, dated July 1995, of the two 

crash tests conducted by the Federal Outdoor Impact Laboratory in McLean, Virginia. 

The supports were dual post, 102-mm x 152-mm full dimension western red cedar with 

no weakening features, embedded 1220 mm into S-2 (weak) soil. The two posts were 

spaced 900 mm apart and both were struck with the test vehicle. The bottom of the 600-

mm x 1500-mm, 3-mm thick aluminum sign panel was 2100 mm above the ground. 

Full-scale crash testing was done in accordance with the National Highway Cooperative 

Research Program Report 350 Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance

Evaluation of Highway Features. Requirements for breakaway supports are found in the 

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials’ (AASHTO) 

Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires and

Traffic Signals. These specifications have been adopted by the FHWA. A summary of 

the crash test results is found below: 

Test Number 95F005 95F006 

Vehicle Mass, kg 839 839 

Vehicle Impact Speed, m/s 939 (35.6 km/h) 26.9 (96.8 km/h) 

Vehicle Velocity Change, m/s 3.1 2.6 

Occupant Impact Speed, m/s 2.3 1.9 

Stub Height None None 

These results meet the change-in-velocity and stub height requirements of the AASHTO 

and the FHWA. Because tests of wood posts in weak soils have been shown to be 

“worst-case” tests, further testing in strong soil is not deemed necessary. Therefore, the 

subject dual-post western red cedar sign supports are acceptable for use on the National 
Highway System, when selected by a highway agency. This acceptance does not cover 

the structural aspects of the sign support system. We assume that the State will develop 

wood grading and design specifications to ensure that in-service sign supports are 

comparable to those used in the crash tests. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 Jerry L. Poston, Chief 

 Federal-Aid and Design Division 

Supplement to Geometric and Roadside Design Acceptance Letter No. SS-46
#### Charles ROBERTS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-718.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 17, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.