alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1



List of Subsidiaries



The following table sets forth certain information concerning the principal subsidiaries of Sunrise Telecom Incorporated:



|                                       |  |                                            
|-------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Name                                   |  | State or OtherJurisdiction of Incorporation
|Sunrise Telecom Broadband, Inc.        |  | Georgia, U.S.A.                            
|Sunrise Telecom S.R.L.                 |  | Italy                                      
|Sunrise Telecom Broadband Corp.        |  | Nova Scotia, Canada                        
|Taiwan Sunrise Telecom Company Limited |  | Taiwan                                     



The names of certain
subsidiaries have been omitted because such unnamed subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate, would not constitute a significant subsidiary as that term is defined in Regulation S-X.
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Snap2
Corporation, for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, I certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)   
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Snap2 Corporation for the quarter ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)   
the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the
quarter ended December 31, 2003, fairly presents in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Snap2 Corporation.
 
 
 
 By: /s/
Kevin D.
Johnson
 
 Name: Kevin D.
Johnson
  Title:                     
P incipal
Executive Officer,
 Principal
Financial Officer and Director
  Date: May 18,
2005
#### Lester BARON, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 77-1246.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 28, 1978.

Lester Baron, in pro per.

No appearance for respondent.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

By Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Petitioner Lester Baron seeks review of the order of the Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for unemployment benefits.

The Claims Examiner determined that Petitioner was not entitled to benefits because he was discharged for misconduct connected with work. The Appeals Referee amended the determination of the Claims Examiner by finding that Petitioner was not entitled to benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause attributable to the employer. The decision of the Appeals Referee was affirmed by the Industrial Relations Commission.

We find that the Appeals Referee’s ruling that Petitioner voluntarily left his employment without good cause is not supported by competent substantial evidence. *Ivie*v. *Florida Department of Commerce, Indus. Rel. Com’n,*323 So.2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *Castillo v. Florida Department of Commerce,*253 So.2d 162 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971).

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari is granted, the order under review is quashed, and the cause is remanded for entry of an order allowing the prescribed benefits.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 32005M3760 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005M3760

**Commission Decision of 11/04/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3760 - AXA PRIVATE EQUITY / LARIVIERE) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the French text is authentic) **

*

*

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/3760 — AXA Private Equity/Lariviere)

(2005/C 94/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 11 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

- from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

- in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3760. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

--------------------------------------------------
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT 	

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendments No. 1 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-100165 and 333-54392 on Form S-3, Registration Statement Nos. 333-27291 and 333-21273 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-97893, 333-47596, 333-03465, and 333-61611 on Form S-8 of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. of our report dated February 21, 2003 (March 11, 2003, as to Note W), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Seattle, Washington

March 12, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JULIO ELIEZER ORTIZ, SR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 615 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of January, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
April 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Varian, Inc.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 11, 2009                                                 
|                                                                    
|/s/ G. EDWARD MCCLAMMY                                              
|G. Edward McClammy Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Evarista R. COSTE and Esteban Sanchez and Modesta Sanchez, his wife, Appellants, v. Luis DE LA GUARDIA, d/b/a De La Guardia Realty, Appellee.

No. 70-1085.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 29, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity
as an officer of International Fuel Technology Inc. ("IFT"), that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of IFT on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report
fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of IFT.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to IFT and will be retained by IFT and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

By: /s/ Jonathan R. Burst                     Date:  May 15, 2003
    ----------------------------------
    Jonathan R. Burst
    Chief Executive Officer


By: /s/ Michael F. Obertop                    Date   May 15, 2003
    ----------------------------------
    Michael F. Obertop
    Chief Financial Officer
(a) Eastern Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle
i ivisi ling, VA 20166-6511
US. Department Highway Division Sterling, 0161

of Transportation

Federal Highway
Administration

MAY -9 2013 In Reply Refer to: HFPP-15

Mr. Christopher D. Clement, Sr.
Commissioner

New Hampshire Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 483

Concord, NH 03302-0483

Subject: MAP-21 Access Program Programming Decisions Committee Members
Dear Mr. Clement:

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141,
includes the establishment of the new Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP). This new
program will be administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Federal
Lands Highway. New Hampshire is served by the Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division
(EFLHD) office in Sterling, Virginia.

A key requirement for implementing the FLAP is to coordinate the establishment of a three
member Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for programming the FLAP
funds allocated to each state. Each state level PDC consists of a representative from the Federal
Lands Highway Division office, the State Department of Transportation, and an organization or
entity that is suited to represent the local entities responsible for building, operating, or
maintaining transportation facilities that are located on, are adjacent to, or provide access to
Federal lands. Our program managers have coordinated with your department and have
identified the following positions that will fulfill the PDC requirement:

FLAP Program Manager, FHWA, EFLHD
Project Manager, New Hampshire Department of Transportation
Executive Director, North Country Council


Additional information on the implementation of FLAP can be found on the EFLHD MAP-21
website at http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/federal-lands-access.aspx. If you have any
questions, please contact Mr. David Payne at 571-434-1543 or David.Payne@dot.gov, or myself
at 703-404-6276 or Karen.Schmidt@dot.gov.

Sincerely yours,

GyKaren A. Schmidt
Director, Office of Program Administration

ce:

Mr. Jeff Hayes, Executive Director, North Country Council, Bethleham, NH

Mr. Ronald Grandmaison, Project Manager, New Hampshire Department of Transportation,
Concord, NH

Mr. Patrick Bauer, Division Administrator, FHWA, New Hampshire Division Office, Concord,
NH
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo20825 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00386-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.T., a Child

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-PA-01687

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s termination order is 

AFFIRMED.

We order that no costs be assessed against appellant Mother because she is indigent. 

SIGNED November 1, 2017.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
# L_2009049DE.01004802.xml

| 20.2.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 49/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 49/48

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 382/2005 der Kommission vom 7. März 2005 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1786/2003 des Rates über die gemeinsame Marktorganisation für Trockenfutter

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 61 vom 8. März 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 61 vom 8. März 2005

Seite 12, Artikel 24 Absatz 1 Unterabsatz 2:

anstatt:

„Die zuständigen Behörden nehmen Gegenkontrollen zwischen den im Sammelantrag angegebenen landwirtschaftlichen Parzellen und/oder den im Identifizierungssystem für landwirtschaftliche Parzellen nachgewiesenen Referenzparzellen vor, um die Beihilfefähigkeit der Flächen als solche zu überprüfen und somit jegliche ungerechtfertigte Beihilfegewährung zu vermeiden.“

muss es heißen:

„Die zuständigen Behörden nehmen Gegenkontrollen zwischen den im Sammelantrag, den Verträgen und/oder Liefererklärungen angegebenen landwirtschaftlichen Parzellen und den im Identifizierungssystem für landwirtschaftliche Parzellen nachgewiesenen Referenzparzellen vor, um die Beihilfefähigkeit der Flächen als solche zu überprüfen und somit jegliche ungerechtfertigte Beihilfegewährung zu vermeiden.“

---
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

Number Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Unit Accessed Applicant County

OH-01

Wakefield Mound Road 

Improvement Project

Resurfacing/Culvert 

Replacement

Department of Energy - 

Portsmouth/Paducah 

Project

Pike County Pike

OH-02 Pine Creek Road Phase 1 Reconstruction and 

Roadway widening

US Forest Service - 

Wayne National Forest Scioto County Scioto

OH-03 Pine Creek Road Phase 2 Reconstruction and 

Roadway widening

US Forest Service - 

Wayne National Forest Scioto County Scioto

OH-04 Boston Mills Road Safety & 

Accessibility Project

Reconstruction and 

Roadway widening

National Park Service - 

Cuyahoga Valley 

National Park

Summit County Summit

OH-05 MOT- Harshman Road Bridge Bridge Replacement

Department of Defense 

- Wright Patterson Air 

Force Base

Montgomery 

County Montgomery

OH-07

Gallia Forestry Roads 

Improvement Project 

(CR68 Penial Road Phase 2)

Resurfacing & Bridge 

Replacement

US Forest Service - 

Wayne National Forest Gallia County Gallia

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Ohio Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its initial, multiyear Program 

of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Ohio FLAP are listed below in no particular order, and include:

Ohio Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2013-2014
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these agreements. Funding for these projects is not guaranteed. Funding beyond FY 

2014 is dependent on reauthorization of the Access Program by Congress. The Ohio PDC does not have a firm date for the next call for projects under 

the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. If you have any questions please contact David Payne, Access Program 

Manager, at 571-434-1543 or email at David.Payne@dot.gov.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-25-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-25-1997
<CASH>                                       6,879,111
<SECURITIES>                                12,379,680
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,846,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    55,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,159,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,064,008
<PP&E>                                      13,596,163
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,217,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,218,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,866,403
<BONDS>                                      2,900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,751
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,083,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,218,140
<SALES>                                     36,647,770
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,647,770
<CGS>                                       16,832,999
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,560,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             190,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,604,962
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,880,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,724,962
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,724,962
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
        

</TABLE>
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

**Waterfowl Identification in the Central Flyway**

##       Barrow's Goldeneye    

----

****

**Body:** Purple head with crescent-shaped white cheek-spot.     Remainder of bird similar to Common Goldeneye. **Note:** Rare     east of the Rocky Mountains.   

----

Previous Section
Return to Contents
Next Section

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/waterfwl/bgolden.htm		Page Contact Information: Webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 03-Aug-2006 11:32:16 EDT		Sioux Falls, SD [sdww54]
#### Oscar W. TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-702.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 22, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and Edwin T. Mulock, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Tucker alleges that as a result of threats and coercive treatment, he made statements which were used against him to force him into pleading guilty. Nothing in the record refutes his allegations, and Tucker therefore should be granted an evidentiary hearing. Rudolph v. State, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 14; Cf. Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.
L:\SURVEY\QAQC\CFLHD Current Standards and Specifications for SMROW\CFLHD Centerline Staking SC Standards and Specifications.doc

CFLHD CENTERLINE STAKING STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS

I Check existing control:

(a) Perform observations of existing CFLHD control monuments and compare the results to the PS&E 

Survey Control Sheet;

(b) Analyze the data to determine if the control meets CFLHD standards and;

(c) Notify the Survey Manager if the control fails to meet CFLHD standards.

II Set centerline points as indicated in Scope of Work, according to the following:

(a) Points that fall within the existing pavement surface shall be marked with a 12d light boat nail (or 

equivalent) with 1” square, high visibility orange, reinforced nylon flagging and white painted 

circle with station;

(b) Points that fall within the gravel or dirt roadway shall be marked with a 3⁄4” square hub where 

possible or 60d spike and 6” orange plastic whisker. An offset stake shall be placed to the right 

side (up station) of the existing roadway at the edge of the maintained area. The centerline station 

and offset distance to the centerline point shall be marked on the offset stake;

(1) All offset stakes shall be 1”x 2”x 18” finished size pine. Offset stakes and lath shall be painted 

white and marked as indicated on attachment #1.

(c) Points that fall outside the existing roadway shall be marked with lath. The station shall be marked 

on the lath;

(d) Points shall be set to within 0.3 US Survey Foot of the true horizontal and vertical position relative 

to the CFLHD control monuments;

III Blackout old centerline marks on pavement and remove old centerline stakes.

IV Create a 3D MicroStation® CAD .dgn file plotting the As-staked centerline points and indicating the 

vertical difference from the As-staked centerline points and the existing .TIN file.
Fw: Response to Request for Extension of Comment Period for Proposed 

Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and 

Oxides of Sulfur

Ginger Tennant to: Sherry Russell 09/13/2011 02:54 PM

History: This message has been replied to.

Could you please get this into the docket?

Thank you!

Ginger Tennant

Ambient Standards Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

C561E (mail drop C539-01)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: 919.541.4072

Fax: 919.541.0237

----- Forwarded by Ginger Tennant/RTP/USEPA/US on 09/13/2011 02:53 PM -----

From: Ginger Tennant/RTP/USEPA/US

To: rsteinwurtzel@bakerlaw.com

Date: 09/13/2011 02:53 PM

Subject: Response to Request for Extension of Comment Period for Proposed Secondary National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur

Dear Mr. Steinwurtzel, 

We have received and carefully considered your request for an extension of the comment period for the 

Proposed Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur. 

Due to the consent decree entered by the District Court for the District of Columbia, which governs the 

schedule for this review and requires EPA to issue a final rule by March 20, 2012, we do not believe there 

is time to extend the public comment period. We encourage you and your client to expedite the 

submission of your comments as much as possible. To the extent you submit your comments after the 

close of the public comment period, we will make every effort to consider them. 

Sincerely, 

Ginger Tennant

Ambient Standards Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

C561E (mail drop C539-01)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: 919.541.4072

Fax: 919.541.0237
#### CONSOLIDATED AUDIO-VISUAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. HOSPITAL TELEVISION, INC., a Foreign corporation, Joseph Klein and Zola Klein, Appellees.

No. 70-292.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 12, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1971.

Michael H. Kramer, Miami, for appellant.

Milton E. Grusmark, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Consolidated Audio Visual Engineering Services, Inc. was plaintiff in an action for damages upon its contract to purchase business assets from Hospital Television, Inc. Hospital Television, Inc. counterclaimed against Consolidated for the balance of the purchase price. At the conclusion of a non-jury trial final judgment was entered for the defendant in Consolidated’s action and for the defendant counterclaimant on its counterclaim against Consolidated. Consolidated limited its appeal to the question of whether the trial court committed error in entering judgment upon the counterclaim.

The assignments of error directed to this single point urge that the evidence does not support the trial judge’s judgment. Our *165review of the record convinces ns that error has not been demonstrated. Silver v. Wilson, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 201.

Affirmed.