alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
254 La. 827

#### Gerald J. TALLEY v. Ernest H. FRIEDMAN et al.

No. 50189.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 6, 1969.

In re: Gerald J. Talley applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Jerome E. Domengeaux Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Lafayette, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 20th day of January, 1970, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through his attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

It is further ordered that, in the meantime and until the further orders of this court all proceedings against the relator in said 15th Judicial District Court shall be stayed and suspended.

Granted with stay order.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3474 

To redesignate the Hulls Cove Visitor Center at Acadia National Park as 

the ‘‘George J. Mitchell, Jr., Visitor Center’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2023 

Mr. KING (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Hulls Cove Visitor Center at Acadia National Park as the ‘‘George J. Mitchell, Jr., Visitor Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE HULLS COVE VISITOR 

4 CENTER AT ACADIA NATIONAL PARK AS THE 

5 GEORGE J. MITCHELL, JR., VISITOR CENTER. 

6 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Hulls Cove Visitor Center 

7 at Acadia National Park located in Bar Harbor, Maine, 

8 or any successor to that visitor center that is constructed 

9 after the date of enactment of this Act and serves as the 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3474 IS

1 primary visitor center for Acadia National Park, shall be 

2 known and designated as the ‘‘George J. Mitchell, Jr., Vis3 itor Center’’. 

4 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg5 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

6 States to the visitor center referred to in subsection (a) 

7 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George J. Mitch8 ell, Jr., Visitor Center’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund, on Form N-CSR; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| December 2, 2008 | /s/Michael G. Clark                     |
|------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|             | Michael G. Clark                        |
|             | President                               |
|             | Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund |

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund, on Form N-CSR; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| December 2, 2008 | /s/Paul Schubert                        |
|------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|             | Paul Schubert                           |
|             | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   |
|             | Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund |
# L_2005066EN.01001401.xml

| 12.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 66/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 66/14

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 419/2005

of 11 March 2005

concerning tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender for the export to certain third countries of wholly milled and medium and long grain A rice issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 14(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 14(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders submitted from 7 to 10 March 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the export refund on wholly milled rand, medium and long grain A rice to certain third European countries issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 353, 27.11.2004, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 61, 7.3.1975, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 18).

3

---
Exhibit 10.07
                                                                   -------------


                                 Amendment No. 1
                                     to the
                       Terms and Conditions of Employment
                                     between
                           William T. Schleyer ("WTS")
                                       and
               Adelphia Communications Corporation (the "Company")


     WHEREAS, WTS and the Company wish to amend that certain employment
agreement executed on January 17, 2003 (the "Employment Agreement").

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

     1. The third sentence of Section 9 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows: "One-third of such restricted shares
shall vest on the second anniversary of the Effective Date, an additional
one-third shall vest on the first anniversary of the date of the Company's
emergence from bankruptcy, and the final one-third shall vest on the second
anniversary of such date of emergence."

     2. Except as provided in this Amendment No. 1, the terms and conditions of
the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged.

/s/ William T. Schleyer
------------------------------          Adelphia Communications Corporation
     William T. Schleyer

                                        By: /s/ Erkie Kailbourne
                                            ------------------------------
February ___, 2003                          Name:  Erkie Kailbourne
                                            Title: Chairman and Interim Chief
                                                   Executive Officer


                                        February ___, 2003
# L_2005164EN.01002801.xml

| 24.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/28

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 965/2005

of 23 June 2005

amending the rates of refunds applicable to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular Article 27(5)(a) and (15) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The rates of the refunds applicable from 27 May 2005 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 805/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The rates of the refunds applicable from 27 May 2005 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 805/2005 (2).

| (2) | It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 805/2005 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 805/2005 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 805/2005 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 June 2005.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 134, 27.5.2005, p. 35.

2

---

ANNEX

Rates of refunds applicable from 24 June 2005 to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

| CN code | Description | Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| In case of advance fixing of refunds | Other |
| 1701 99 10 | white sugar | 36,10 | 36,10 |

CN code

Description

Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg

In case of advance fixing of refunds

Other

1701 99 10

white sugar

36,10

36,10

---

(1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3709 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3709

   To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to add additional investment 
thresholds for an individual to qualify as an accredited investor, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2024

    Mr. Budd (for himself, Ms. Smith, and Mr. Braun) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to add additional investment 
thresholds for an individual to qualify as an accredited investor, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Investment Opportunity Expansion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INVESTMENT THRESHOLDS TO QUALIFY AS AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR.

    Section 2(a)(15) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 
77b(a)(15)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(iii) with respect to a proposed transaction, any 
                individual whose aggregate investment, at the 
                completion of such transaction, in securities with 
                respect to which there has not been a public offering 
                is not more than 10 percent of the greater of--
                            ``(I) the net assets of the individual; or
                            ``(II) the annual income of the 
                        individual.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10157.

#### The Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. *v.*Walcutt, Admr.

(Decided February 5, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Miami County.

*645*Mr. C. B. Heiserman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Davy & St. John*and *C. A. Thatcher,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
October 13, 2000 

 HSA-1/CC35D 

Barry D. Stevens, P.E. 

Senior Vice President of Engineering 

Energy Absorption Systems, Inc. 

3617 Cincinnati Avenue 

Rocklin, California 95765 

Dear Mr. Stevens: 

Your September 27 letter was hand-carried to Mr. Richard Powers of my staff. In that letter you requested a 

formal Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) review of the accompanying report on two high-speed impacts 

into a 610-mm (2-foot) wide, nine-bay QuadGuard crash cushion unit to confirm that this longer unit remains 

fully acceptable as a National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 crash cushion at 

Test Level 3 (TL-3). You also asked us to acknowledge that the longer unit can safely stop a 2000-kg pickup 

truck impacting head-on at approximately 117 km/h (73 mph) and redirect that size test vehicle in a 115 km/h 

(71 mph) side impact at a 20 degree angle. Testing guidelines contained in NCHRP Report 350 do not address 

impact speeds over 100 km/h (62.1 mph). 

The tested nine-bay QuadGuard is similar to the six-bay unit that was formally accepted by the FHWA as a TL-3 

crash cushion in 1996 but with three additional bays added at the rear of the unit, making its total length 9474 

mm. The head-on test, described above, resulted in an occupant impact velocity (OIV) of 9.6 m/s and a 

ridedown acceleration of 13.6 g’s. The redirection test resulted in a maximum OIV of 6.8 m/s and a ridedown 

acceleration of 21.2 g’s. The latter value slightly exceeds the maximum recommended value of 20 g’s for a 100 

km/h (62.1 mph) crash at TL-3. 

Based on our review of the information you provided to us, we conclude that the nine-bay QuadGuard, as tested, 

remains an acceptable TL-3 crash cushion, but one which has additional capacity for some impacts at higher 

speeds with vehicles in the 2000-kg weight range and higher. We also agree with your conclusion that the 

longer unit will not likely satisfy all vehicle trajectory or occupant injury criteria when struck at the higher speed 

with the smaller 820-kg (1800-pound) car, but that it will perform at least as well as the six-bay unit when 

impacted at speeds over 100 km/h (62.1 mph). 

Since the selection of cost-effective safety devices for installation along a public road remains the prerogative of 

the appropriate highway authority, this letter should not be interpreted as tacit encouragement to use--or 

discouragement against using--roadside hardware that exceeds currently accepted minimum performance 

requirements. 

Sincerely yours, 

 (Original signed by Frederick G. Wright, Jr.) 

Frederick G. Wright, Jr. 

Program Manager, Safety
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28883]



[[Page 58735]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Federal Maritime Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 9:00 a.m.--October 27, 1997.

PLACE: 800 North Capitol Street NW.--Room 1000, Washington, DC.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTER(S) TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Docket No. 96-20--Port Restrictions and 
Requirements in the United States/Japan Trade.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Joseph C. Polking, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28883 Filed 10-28-97; 10:47 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
#### Grant Lee PAGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-92.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 15, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28861]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-957-1420-00]


IDAHO: Filing of Plats of Survey; Idaho

    The plat of the following described land was officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9 a.m. October 23, 1997.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
Second Standard Parallel South (south boundary), portions of the east, 
west, and north boundaries of the subdivisional lines, and of Mineral 
Survey No. 2538, T. 12 S., R. 45 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group 913, 
was accepted October 23, 1997. This survey was executed to meet certain 
administrative needs of the USDA Forest Service.
    All inquiries concerning the survey of the above described land 
must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, Idaho State Office, Bureau 
of Land Management, 1387 South Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho, 83709-1657.

    Dated: October 23, 1997.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 97-28861 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
#### Kenneth G. PARSONS, Petitioner, v. SAM FERLITA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Pacific Employers Insurance Company, et al., Respondents.

No. 44532.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 12, 1974.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1521

VIRGINIA EARLY RIGGAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

R.W. MOORE EQUIPMENT COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-890-5-BR2)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Virginia Early Riggan, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Hill Garber,

BOXLEY, BOLTON & GARBER, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying her

motion for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a), 50(b). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Riggan v. R.W.

Moore Equip. Co., No. CA-96-890-5-BR-2 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 1998). We

deny Appellant’s motion for oral argument and preparation of a

transcript at government expense because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANDREY GONCHAROV, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 04-371 Erie

v. )

)

THOMAS HOGAN, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on December 20,

2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 17], filed on

January 23, 2006, recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be

dismissed for failure to prosecute. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the

date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and

on Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and

documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and objections

thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is

DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 17] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on January 23, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00371-SJM-SPB Document 18 Filed 02/13/06 Page 1 of 1