alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-1040 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-029-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### Jon B. RIVERA and United Services Automobile Association, a foreign corporation, Petitioners, v. Richard WEINFELD, Respondent.

No. 44060.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 20, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 18, 1974.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

McCAIN, J., dissents.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tasco Holdings International Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John Lauring, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of February 2006.


/s/ John Lauring
------------------------------
John Lauring
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. David Brow, Treasurer, Secretary and director of The Electric Network.com, Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Electric Network.com Inc;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2004

/s/ J. David Brow					J. David Brow
Treasurer, Secretary and director
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I,
        Jonathan R. Burst, Chief Executive Officer of International Fuel Technology,
        Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
        knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
        2007
        as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:
        August 14, 2007
  By:
              */s/
                Jonathan R. Burst*Jonathan
                  R. Burst
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Henry STEIGERWALDT, Debtor.

No. 5793.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Oct. 7, 1936.

Jacob Levy, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.

E. R. Borgmeier, of Chicago, 111., for appellee.

Before EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges, and LINDLEY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This cause now comes on to be heard on the printed record and briefs of counsel and on oral argument.

On consideration whereof it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the order or decree of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, in this cause appealed from, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with 'costs.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 926]


Grant of Authority For Subzone Status Pepsico of Puerto Rico, 
Inc. (Soft Drink Flavoring Concentrates) Cidra, Puerto Rico

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, by an Act of Congress approved June 18, 1934, an Act ``To 
provide for the establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of 
entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, 
and for other purposes,'' as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the FTZ Act), 
the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to grant to 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry; Whereas, the 
Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the establishment of 
special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities cannot serve the 
specific use involved; Whereas, an application from the Commercial and 
Farm Credit and Development Corporation for Puerto Rico, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 61, for authority to establish special-purpose 
subzone status for the soft drink flavoring concentrate manufacturing 
plant of PepsiCo of Puerto Rico, Inc., in Cidra, Puerto Rico, was filed 
by the Board on August 22, 1996, and notice inviting public comment was 
given in the Federal Register (FTZ Docket 66-96, 61 FR 47870, 9-11-96); 
and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application 
is in the public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status at the PepsiCo of Puerto Rico, Inc., plant in Cidra, Puerto Rico 
(Subzone 61J), at the location described in the application, subject to 
the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of October 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

    Attest:
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28311 Filed 10-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### James McRAY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1970.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 21, 1977.

James McRay, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3513 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3513

  To require the Secretary of the Air Force to establish a permanent 
 program to provide tuition assistance to members of the Air National 
                                 Guard.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 2023

  Mr. Hoeven (for himself and Mrs. Shaheen) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of the Air Force to establish a permanent 
 program to provide tuition assistance to members of the Air National 
                                 Guard.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Air Guard Standardizing Tuition 
Assistance To Unify the Services Act of 2023'' or the ``Air Guard 
STATUS Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF TUITION ASSISTANCE TO MEMBERS OF AIR NATIONAL 
              GUARD.

    The Secretary of the Air Force shall establish a permanent program 
to pay, under section 2007 of title 10, United States Code, all or a 
portion of the charges of an educational institution for the tuition or 
expenses of a member of the Air National Guard who is in compliance 
with the training requirements under regulations prescribed under 
section 502(a) of title 32, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
        32.2**







**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350**


**(as
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of**


**the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Audible Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), I, Andrew P. Kaplan, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:







1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




By:  /s/
        Andrew P Kaplan
 Name:  Andrew
        P.
        Kaplan
 Title:  Executive
        Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
 and
        Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 Dated:  August
        4,
        2005





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of this Report or
      as a
      separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement
      required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
      by
      the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.
#### Robert C. BIRMELIN, Petitioner, v. Ray BOYMER and Mary Boymer, Husband and wife, Respondents.

No. 39888.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 20, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 227 So.2d 358.

ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Donald M. HUBER, Appellant, v. Linda K. HUBER, Appellee.

No. 73-407.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 27, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Claude R. Edwards, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly report of Bio Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:   December
31, 2008


By:
            /s/
      David KoosDavid
      KoosActing
      Chief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bio
Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. and will be retained by Bio Matrix Scientific
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEUDLE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FISCAL QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          500
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       500
<OTHER-SE>                                     (500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   500
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
# L_2005154EN.01000901.xml

| 17.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/9

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 908/2005

of 16 June 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 29th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 29th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 39,902 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

2

---