### 58301 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 188 / Monday, September 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules

the Rikers Island Bridge at approximate position 40 ° 46 ′ 51 ′′ N, 073 ° 53 ′ 21 ′′ W and east of a line drawn between the point at the Rikers Island Bridge to a point on the shore in Queens, New York, at approximate position 40 ° 46 ′ 36′′ N,
073 ° 53 ′ 31 ′′ W (NAD 1983).

(4) United Nations Manhattan Shoreline. All waters of the East River bound by the following points:
40 ° 44 ′ 37′′ N, 073 ° 58 ′ 16.5 ′′ W (the base of East 35th Street, Manhattan), then east
to 40 ° 44 ′ 34.5 ′′ N, 073 ° 58 ′ 10.5 ′′ W (about 180 yards offshore of Manhattan), then northeasterly to 40 ° 45 ′ 29′′ N,
073 ° 57 ′ 26.5 ′′ W (about 125 yards offshore of Manhattan at the Queensboro Bridge), then northwesterly
to 40 ° 45 ′ 31 ′′ N, 073 ° 57 ′ 30.5 ′′ W (Manhattan shoreline at the Queensboro Bridge), then southerly along the shoreline to the starting point at
40 ° 44 ′ 37′′ N, 073 ° 58 ′ 16.5 ′′ W (NAD 1983).

(5) United Nations West Channel Closure. All waters of the East River north of a line drawn from approximate position 40 ° 44 ′ 37′′ N, 073 ° 58 ′ 16.5 ′′ W (the base of East 35th Street, Manhattan), to approximate position
40 ° 44 ′ 31.04′′ N, 073 ° 58 ′03.10′′ W (approximately 400 yards east of the Manhattan shoreline), all waters west of a line drawn from approximate position
40 ° 44 ′ 31.04′′ N, 073 ° 58 ′03.10′′ W (approximately 400 yards east of the Manhattan shoreline), to the southern tip of Roosevelt Island at approximate position 40 ° 44 ′57.96′′ N, 073 ° 57 ′41.57′′ W, then along the western shoreline of Roosevelt Island to the Queensboro Bridge, and all waters south of the Queensboro Bridge (NAD 1983).

(6) United Nations Full River Closure. All waters of the East River north of a line drawn from approximate position
40 ° 44 ′ 37′′ N, 073 ° 58 ′ 16.5 ′′ W (the base of East 35th Street, Manhattan), to approximate position 40 ° 44 ′ 23 ′′ N,
073 ° 57 ′44.5 ′′ W (Hunters Point, Long Island City), and south of the Queensboro Bridge (NAD 1983).

(b) Definitions. As used in this section—

Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been designated by the COTP to act on the COTP’s behalf. The designated representative may be on a Coast Guard vessel, or onboard a federal, state, or local agency vessel that is authorized to act in support of the Coast Guard.

Dignitary means the President or Vice President of the United States, or visiting heads of foreign states or governments.

(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR 165.33, no person or vessel may enter or move within a security zone created by this section while that security zone is being enforced unless granted permission to do so by the Coast Guard’s First District Commander, the COTP New York, or the designated representative. Vessel operators and persons given permission to enter or operate in a security zone must comply with all directions given to them by the First District Commander, the COTP, or the designated representative. Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard or other duly authorized law enforcement vessel (e.g. New York City police) by siren, radio, flashing lights, or other means, the operator of a vessel must proceed as directed and follow any instructions to anchor or moor up to a waterfront facility.

(d) Enforcement Periods. The security zone described in paragraph (a)(4) of this section is subject to enforcement at all times. All other security zones established by this section will only be enforced when necessary to protect dignitaries, as determined by the COTP New York.

(e) Notification. Because the security zone described in paragraph (a)(4) of this section is subject to enforcement at all times, the Coast Guard will not necessarily take any action to further notify the public about the enforcement of that zone. As for the enforcement periods for the other security zones contained herein, the Coast Guard will rely on the methods described in 33 CFR 165.7 to notify the public of the time and duration of any enforcement period. The COTP New York may also notify the public about enforcement of these security zones via http:// homeport.uscg.mil/newyorkinformation.

(f) Contact Information. Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within a security zone established by this section shall telephone the COTP New York at 718–354–4356 or the designated representative via VHF channel 16 to obtain permission to do

so.

Dated: September 16, 2014. V.B. Gifford, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014–23171 Filed 9–26–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0538; FRL–9915–50– Region 9]** 

**Revision of Air Quality Implementation Plan; California; Placer County Air**  **Pollution Control District; Stationary Source Permits** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns a permitting rule that regulates construction and modifications of major stationary sources of air pollution. The revisions correct deficiencies in PCAPCD Rule 502, New Source Review, previously identified by EPA in a final rule dated September 24, 2013. We are proposing to approve revisions that correct the identified deficiencies.

**DATES :**  Any comments must arrive by October 29, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA–R09– OAR–2014–0538, by one of the following methods:

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions.

2. Email: R9airpermits@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Gerardo Rios (Air3), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http:// www.regulations.gov or email. http:// www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact


### 58302 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 188 / Monday, September 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules

you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

Docket: EPA has established a docket for this action under EPA–R09–OAR– 2014–0538. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents are listed at http:// www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-volume reports), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION**
**CONTACT** section.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  La weeda Ward, EPA Region IX, (213) 244– 1812, ward.laweeda@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This proposal addresses PCAPCD Rule 502, New Source Review. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register , we are approving this local rule in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in a subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further information, please see the direct final action.

Dated: July 31, 2014. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2014–23002 Filed 9–26–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0586; FRL–9917–22– Region–9]** 

**Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; California;**  **Regional Haze Progress Report**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency.

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the California Regional Haze (RH) State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) documenting that the State’s existing plan is making adequate progress to achieve visibility goals by 2018. The California RH SIP revision addresses the Regional Haze Rule (RHR) requirements under the Clean Air Act (CAA) to submit a report describing progress in achieving reasonable progress goals (RPGs) to improve visibility in Federally designated Class I areas in California and in nearby states that may be affected by emissions from sources in California. EPA is proposing to approve California’s determination that the existing RH SIP is adequate to meet the visibility goals, and requires no substantive revision at this time.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received by the designated contact at the address listed below on or before October 29,
2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– OAR–2014–0586, by one of the following methods:

• Federal Rulemaking portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

• Email: webb.thomas@epa.gov

.

• Fax: 415–947–3579 (Attention: Thomas Webb).

• Mail, Hand Delivery, or Courier: Thomas Webb, EPA Region 9, Air Division (AIR–2), 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105. Hand and courier deliveries are only accepted Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.

Instructions: EPA’s policy is to include all comments received in the public docket without change. We may make comments available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information for which disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or that is otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA, without going through http://www.regulations.gov, we will include your email address as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should not include special characters or any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

Docket: All documents for this proposed action are listed in the index for docket number EPA–R09–OAR–
2014–0586 on http:// www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, such as CBI or other information that is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically at http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the Planning Office of the Air Division, AIR–2, EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. To view hard copies of documents listed in the docket index, EPA requests that you contact the individual listed in the **FOR**
**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Thomas Webb, U.S. EPA, Region 9, Planning Office, Air Division, AIR–2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. Thomas Webb may be reached at telephone number (415) 947–4139 and via electronic mail at webb.thomas@
epa.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Table of Contents
I. Overview of Proposed Action II. Background on Regional Haze III. Background on Regional Haze Plans IV. Requirements for Regional Haze Progress Reports