alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2008231DE.01005701.xml

| 29.8.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 231/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 231/57

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 349/2005 der Kommission vom 28. Februar 2005 zur Festlegung der Regeln für die gemeinschaftliche Finanzierung der Dringlichkeitsmaßnahmen und der Bekämpfung bestimmter Tierseuchen gemäß der Entscheidung 90/424/EWG des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 55 vom 1. März 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 55 vom 1. März 2005

Seite 14, Artikel 6 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„(1)   Tritt einer der in Artikel 1 Absatz 1 genannten Fälle im Hoheitsgebiet eines Mitgliedstaats auf, so unterrichtet dieser die Kommission innerhalb von 30 Tagen nach der amtlichen Bestätigung des Ausbruchs über die betroffenen Kategorien von Tieren oder Produkten und über die festgestellten Marktpreise für jede dieser Kategorien.“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   Tritt einer der in Artikel 1 Absatz 1 genannten Fälle im Hoheitsgebiet eines Mitgliedstaats auf, so unterrichtet dieser die Kommission innerhalb von 30 Tagen nach der amtlichen Bestätigung des ersten Ausbruchs über die betroffenen Kategorien von Tieren oder Produkten und über die festgestellten Marktpreise für jede dieser Kategorien.“

---
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Progreen Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jan
Telander, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.





/s/
      Jan TelanderJan
      Telander, President, Chief Executive Officerand
      Principal Financial
Officer





September  17,
2010
#### Spero TASSAPOULOS and Evangeline Tassapoulos, his wife, Appellants, v. SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. DD-284.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 14, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 1, 1978.

Gerald G. Alexander, Orange Park, for appellants.

James M. McLean, of Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones & Gay, Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

SMITH, Judge.

The record titleholders to certain land in Clay County appeal from a judgment holding that the appellee railroad obtained title by adverse possession, without color of title, to a strip along one boundary of the tract. While the record supports the trial court’s judgment concerning a small parcel actually occupied by the railroad’s roadbed, the record does not support the railroad’s claim to a wider strip parallel to its track, the boundary of which is marked not by a substantial enclosure but only by power poles and lines on appellants’ land. Section 95.18, Florida Statutes (1975); *Downing*v. *Bird,*100 So.2d 57 (Fla.1958). The case will be remanded for entry of a conforming judgment.

REVERSED.

ERVIN, J., concurs.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., dissents.

RAWLS, Acting Chief Judge

(dissenting)

In my opinion, there was competent, substantial evidence to support the trial judge’s finding that appellee Seaboard acquired the disputed property by adverse possession. *Kiser v. Howard,*133 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961).
```

[111th Congress Public Law 334]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 3582]]

Public Law 111-334
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to authorize the Coquille Indian 
   Tribe, the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians, the Confederated 
 Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw, the Klamath Tribes, and 
   the Burns Paiute Tribe to obtain 99-year lease authority for trust 
               land. <<NOTE: Dec. 22, 2010 -  [S. 1448]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LEASES OF RESTRICTED LAND.

    Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of August 9, 1955 (25 
U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended in the second sentence by inserting ``land 
held in trust for the Coquille Indian Tribe, land held in trust for the 
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians, land held in trust for the 
Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians, land 
held in trust for the Klamath Tribes, and land held in trust for the 
Burns Paiute Tribe,'' after ``lands held in trust for the Confederated 
Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon,''.

    Approved December 22, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1448:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 111-245 (Comm. on Indian Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Sept. 22, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 14, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
#### CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation, Petitioner, v. James D. SHAW and the State of Florida, Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43976.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 9, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Product
Inspections, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John Van Zyll, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2005           By: /s/ John Van Zyll
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  John Van Zyll
                                  Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
                                  and Chief Financial Officer

                                       15
# L_2005183EN.01006801.xml

| 14.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 183/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 183/68

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1104/2005

of 13 July 2005

laying down the reduction coefficient to be applied under tariff subquota III for common wheat of a quality other than high quality opened by Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002 of 27 December 2002 opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for common wheat of a quality other than high quality from third countries and derogating from Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 (2), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002 opens an annual tariff quota of 2 981 600 tonnes of common wheat of a quality other than high quality. That quota is divided into three subquotas. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002 opens an annual tariff quota of 2 981 600 tonnes of common wheat of a quality other than high quality. That quota is divided into three subquotas.

| (2) | Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002 fixes a quantity of 592 900 tonnes for subquota III for the period 1 July to 30 September 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002 fixes a quantity of 592 900 tonnes for subquota III for the period 1 July to 30 September 2005.

| (3) | The quantities applied for on 11 July 2005, in accordance with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002, exceed the quantities available. The extent to which licences may be issued should therefore be determined and a reduction coefficient laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The quantities applied for on 11 July 2005, in accordance with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002, exceed the quantities available. The extent to which licences may be issued should therefore be determined and a reduction coefficient laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Each application for an import licence for subquota III for common wheat of a quality other than high quality lodged and forwarded to the Commission on 11 July 2005 in accordance with Article 5(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002 shall be accepted at a rate of 1,84593 % of the quantity applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 July 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 88. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1111/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 21).

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001078723
<NAME> BLENCATHIA ACQUISITION CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   808
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5000000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       808
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0
        

</TABLE>
# L_2005106EN.01000301.xml

| 27.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 106/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 106/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 632/2005

of 26 April 2005

amending Regulation (EC) No 1185/2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for the export of rye held by the German intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 1185/2004 (2) has opened a standing invitation to tender for the export of rye held by the German intervention agency. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1185/2004 (2) has opened a standing invitation to tender for the export of rye held by the German intervention agency.

| (2) | Article 5(4) thereof states the address where the tenders must be lodged with the German intervention agency. As a result of an internal reorganisation within the German administrative authorities, this address must be amended. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 5(4) thereof states the address where the tenders must be lodged with the German intervention agency. As a result of an internal reorganisation within the German administrative authorities, this address must be amended.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 5(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1185/2004 is hereby replaced by the following:

‘4.   Tenders must be lodged with the German intervention agency:

| Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE) |
| --- |
| Deichmannsaue 29 |
| D-53179 Bonn |
| Fax | (49) 228 6845 3985
  (49) 228 6845 3276 |

Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE)

Deichmannsaue 29

D-53179 Bonn

Fax

(49) 228 6845 3985

(49) 228 6845 3276

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall apply from 9.00 (Brussels time) on 28 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 April 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 227, 26.6.2004, p. 11. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1730/2004 (OJ L 307, 5.10.2004, p. 3).

2

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131218 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131218 COA: 259299 Oakland CC: 04-196006-FH JESSE JAMES HAYES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      5,000,00
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00




</TABLE>
No. 9812.

#### The State of Ohio *v.*Osmond.

(Decided October 9, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Mahoning County.

*Mr. Wade H. Ellis,*attorney-general; *Mr. W. R. Graham*and *Mr. W. H. Miller,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. N. Anderson,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

*571Shaucic, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### Adrienne G. McDONALD, Appellant, v. Hamilton C. FORMAN, Lois Swartzbaugh, Louis W. King, F. K. Walker, Roy C. Jones, Louise M. Holsom and William H. Grimditch, Jr., as and comprising the Board of Trustees of the Broward General Hospital, and Harry C. Robelen, M. D., Appellees.

No. 69-507.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 24, 1970.

Larry Klein, of Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, McKeown & Dell, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Michael D. Sikes and E. S. Corlett, III, of Sherouse, Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Okell, Miami, for appellee Broward General.

James E. Tribble, of Blackwell, Walker & Gray, Miami, for appellee Robelen.

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the dismissal with prejudice of her claim under F.S. 768.03, F.S.A. for mental pain and suffering arising from the wrongful death of her minor child. Initially we concluded her claim to be improper, but upon rehearing we reach a different result.

Death of the minor child occurred while the parents were married. Following her divorce, appellant-mother now asserts her claim which the trial court has denied.

Dispositive of this issue is the language recently stated in Williams v. Legree, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 13, as follows:

> “The Supreme Court of Florida has established three points critical to a suit under Section 768.03 where both parents are alive but are living apart. First, the existence vel non of a court order designating which parent had legal custody of the deceased child is immaterial. Covey v. Eppes, Fla.1963, 153 So.2d 3, 4, construing Haddock, for Use and Benefit of Wiggins v. Florida Motor Lines Corp., 1942, 150 Fla. 848, 9 So.2d 98. Secondly, *Section 768.03(1) vests in each parent individually the right to recover damages for mental pain and suffering sustained as a result of the child’s death, and this right is retained by each parent regardless of the state of their domestic af*
>       *132
>       *fairs at the time of the child’s death.*Covey v. Eppes, supra at 153 So.2d 4; Haddock, for Use and Benefit of Wiggins v. Florida Motor Lines Corp., supra at 150 Fla. 851, 9 So.2d at 100. Thirdly, the right to recover for the loss of the deceased child’s services belongs to the parent who was actually supporting said child. Covey v. Eppes, supra 153 So.2d at 4, construing Haddock, for Use and Benefit of Wiggins v. Florida Motor Lines Corp., supra. * * * ” (Emphasis supplied.)

Appellant therefore has a cause of action for mental pain and suffering arising from the wrongful death of her minor child and her complaint sufficiently states such.

For this reason our original opinion is hereby vacated and the order dismissing appellant’s complaint with prejudice is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN and McCAIN, JJ., and ADAMS, ALTO (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3700 

To permit nurse practitioners and physician assistants to furnish necessary 

services, appliances, and supplies to individuals receiving medical benefits 

for illnesses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2024 

Mr. HICKENLOOPER (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To permit nurse practitioners and physician assistants to 

furnish necessary services, appliances, and supplies to 

individuals receiving medical benefits for illnesses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care for En5 ergy Workers Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3700 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY TO FURNISH MEDICAL 

2 BENEFITS. 

3 Section 3629 of the Energy Employees Occupational 

4 Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 

5 7384t) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsections (c) through (f) 

7 as subsections (d) through (g), respectively; and 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol9 lowing new subsection (c): 

10 ‘‘(c) ORDERS BY NURSE PRACTITIONERS AND PHYSI11 CIAN ASSISTANTS.—For purposes of subsections (a) and 

12 (b), a nurse practitioner or physician assistant, acting 

13 within the scope of their practice under State law and in 

14 accordance with such regulations and instructions as the 

15 President deems necessary, may prescribe, recommend, or 

16 order services, appliances, and supplies for an individual 

17 receiving medical benefits under this section for an ill18 ness.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS