alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: National compensation  survey. York-Hanover, PA.
SuDocs Number: L 2.121/38:Y 8/
Item    Number:0768-B-38    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000869905
 
 
 
2007
 
2008
 
2009
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  June 25, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
perm |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Maryland – Federal Lands Access Program 

Page 3 of 4

Appendix A - Access Program Screening Process

Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division 

Access Program

Project Screening and Rating Criteria for General Projects, Studies and 

Assessments

Instructions: If the answer is yes to criteria below, then allocate points. Points are cumulative. 

**First two “Base” criteria shall have points, otherwise project does not move forward to Step 2 (Rating Criteria).

STEP 1: INITIAL SCREENING (max 200 points) Point allocation

Economic/Visitation Prioritization

Do FLMA, StateDOT, and Facility Owner agree that the project is an 

economic/visitation generator?

45

Do FLMA, StateDOT, and Facility Owner agree that the project is a priority? 45

Is Project on current State Transportation Improvement Program? 10

Base**

Submitted by facility owner** 40

Project supported by FLMA** 40

20% Match No points

Leveraging additional funding 

more than the required 20% 

match

20% match + (1-10)% of project cost 5

20% match + (11-20)% of project cost 10

20% match + (21)% of project cost 20

STEP 2: PROJECT RATING (max 100 points)

General Projects Point allocation

Safety (20 points)

Addresses or improves identified crash site 10

Considers or improves safety for wide range of users 10

Accessibility and Mobility (20 points)

Identified need on FLMA, State, County, local planning documents or

Comprehensive Plan 10

Fills missing link in network, removes or addresses travel restriction, 

bottleneck/congestion 5

Addresses or improves mode choice, explores and enhances transit systems 

(i.e. operation and maintenance of transit facilities) 5

Preservation (20 points)

Improves surface and/or facility condition 8

Reduces operating costs 4

Enhances scenic and historic areas 8

Economic Development (20 points)
Maryland – Federal Lands Access Program 

Page 4 of 4

Considers or attracts Visitation and Provides Economic Benefit to the Local 

Community

10

Addresses or increases/improves access to FLMA unit/area 10

Environmental Quality and Sustainability (20 points)

Addresses or improves fish passage and wildlife connectivity 6

Addresses or improves water quality, reduces erosion, scour, and/or 

sedimentation

6

Provides bicycle or pedestrian opportunities 8

TOTAL MAXIMUM POINTS (cumulative) = 300
# Widening

# Values
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,724                  19,515
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,516                     494
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,204                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,744                  20,038
<PP&E>                                          10,002                     983
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,487                     122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,749                  33,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,500                   1,813
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            95                      69
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,413                  31,758
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,749                  33,786
<SALES>                                         11,188                   1,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,188                   1,661
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,583                   2,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   135                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 984                      20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,520)                   (687)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       139                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,659)                   (687)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,659)                   (687)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.09)                   (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.09)                   (.16)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tasco International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Adrienne Humphreys, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
10th day of February 2005.


/s/ Adrienne Humphreys
------------------------------
Adrienne Humphreys
Chief Executive Officer
Bridge Replacement 3R Maintenance-Resurfacing

$1.4M

FLAP Obligations/Expenditures by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$0 $0 $0 $4,999 $570,065 $674,972 $1,250,037

FLAP Loan/Credits by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$0 $0 $0 $0 $86,305 $390,500 $476,805

Programming Decisions Committee Members

Name Phone   E-mail Title

Chris Campany 802-257-4547 ccampany@windhamregional.org Windham Regional Commission Execu...

Matthew Langham 802-828-5578 matthew.langham@state.vt.us Project Engineer

Jacinda Russell 571-434-1543 Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov Access Program Manager

Call for Projects information

Start Date End Date

No. applications

received

Total Access funds

requested

7/1/2013 8/15/2013 3 $509,906

1/19/2015 4/17/2015 2 $612,500

7/15/2016 10/14/2016 1 $301,383

Local Match

18.92%

Congressional District

At-large

Total project's costs by FLMA Accessed

FWS 53%

FS 40%

NPS 7%

Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP)

Vermont

Projects Programmed

3

FLAP Funds Programmed

$1.5M

Federal Lands Highway Division

EFLHD

FLAP Allocations by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$203,453 $204,981 $200,871 $250,258 $250,211 $273,346 $1,383,120

$1M

$1.5M

$103K
*This information is an overview of the FLAP projects information. It is subject to change at any time. For additional details or clarifications, please contact the Federal Lands Highway Division offices or visit the State FLAP

webpage.

Project ID Project Name- Description Improvement type Delivery Agency Delivery 

Year

VT FLAP BRANDON BR22(1) Replacement of BR22 along Churchill Road in the 

Town of Brandon, VT. Bridge Replacement Town of Brandon, VT 2017

VT FLAP WDSTK TRL(1) Reconstruct & improve the trails supporting rockwork, 

surface safety, and historical preservation. 3R Maintenance-Resurfacing Town of Woodstock, VT 2017

VT FLAP DERBY 17(1) 6(1) Replace failing culverts on Eagle Point Rd & N. Derby 

Rd with precast concrete structures/bridges. Bridge Replacement Town of Derby 2017
© 2018 HERE, © 2019 Microsoft Corporation

Project ID

VT FLAP BRANDON BR22(1)

VT FLAP DERBY 17(1) 6(1)

VT FLAP WDSTK TRL(1)
Exhibit (j)


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of DWS State Tax-Free Trust on Form N-1A ("Registration Statement") of
our report dated May 27, 2009 relating to the financial statements and financial
highlights which appears in the March 31, 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders of
DWS Massachusetts Tax-Free Fund, which is also incorporated by reference into
the Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the
headings "Financial Highlights", "Financial Statements" and "Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm" in such Registration Statement.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
July 27, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nicklebys.com,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'),  I, Scott
Thornock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Scott Thornock
-----------------------
Scott Thornock
Chief Executive Officer
November 25, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

            CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Net Perceptions, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald
C. Peterson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


      /s/ Donald C. Peterson
-------------------------------
Name:   Donald C. Peterson
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Date:   August 14, 2002


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LIONEL EDWARD KEARSE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 05-348 Erie

v. )

)

BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on November 21, 2005,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

 The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 17], filed on July

28, 2006, recommended that Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative,

motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 14] be granted. The parties were allowed ten

(10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by

certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the

motion and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the

following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the

alternative, motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 14] is GRANTED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 17] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on July 28, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00348-SJM-SPB Document 18 Filed 08/18/06 Page 1 of 1
# L_2005047EN.01001901.xml

| 18.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 274/2005

of 17 February 2005

fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004 of 3 September 2004 on a special intervention measure for oats in Finland and Sweden for the 2004/2005 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland or Sweden to all third countries with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland or Sweden to all third countries with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 11 to 17 February 2005, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004, the maximum refund on exportation of oats shall be 33,95 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 3.

3

---
II 

Calendar No. 315 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3577 

To designate the Federal building located at 300 E. 3rd Street in North 

Platte, Nebraska, as the ‘‘Virginia Smith Federal Building’’, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 11, 2024 

Mr. RICKETTS (for himself and Mrs. FISCHER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

JANUARY 25, 2024 

Reported by Mr. CARPER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building located at 300 E. 3rd 

Street in North Platte, Nebraska, as the ‘‘Virginia Smith 

Federal Building’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VIRGINIA SMITH FEDERAL BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 

5 300 E. 3rd Street in North Platte, Nebraska, shall be 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3577 RS

1 known and designated as the ‘‘Virginia Smith Federal 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the Federal building referred to in subsection 

6 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Virginia 

7 Smith Federal Building’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 315 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3577 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building located at 300 E. 

purposes. ‘‘Virginia Smith Federal Building’’, and for other 3rd Street in North Platte, Nebraska, as the 

JANUARY 25, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                           HOMEQ SERVICING CORPORATION

                      HOMEQ RESIDENTIAL TRUST SERIES 2001-I

                  I, ARTHUR Q. LYON, THE PRESIDENT OF HOMEQ SERVICING
CORPORATION, CERTIFY THAT:

1.       I HAVE REVIEWED THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, AND ALL REPORTS ON FORM
         8-K CONTAINING DISTRIBUTION OR SERVICING REPORTS FILED IN RESPECT OF
         PERIODS INCLUDED IN THE YEAR COVERED BY THIS ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HOMEQ
         RESIDENTIAL TRUST SERIES 2001-I;

2.       BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION IN THESE REPORTS, TAKEN AS A
         WHOLE, DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY UNTRUE STATEMENT OF A MATERIAL FACT OR OMIT
         TO STATE A MATERIAL FACT NECESSARY TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS MADE, IN
         LIGHT OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH SUCH STATEMENTS WERE MADE, NOT
         MISLEADING AS OF THE LAST DAY OF THE PERIOD COVERED BY THIS ANNUAL
         REPORT;

3.       BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, THE DISTRIBUTION OR SERVICING INFORMATION
         REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED TO THE CERTIFICATE ADMINISTRATOR BY THE
         SERVICER UNDER THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT, DATED AS OF
         FEBRUARY 28, 2001 (THE "AGREEMENT") WITH RESPECT TO THE HOMEQ
         RESIDENTIAL TRUST SERIES 2001-I IS INCLUDED IN THESE REPORTS;

4.       I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING THE ACTIVITIES PERFORMED BY THE SERVICER
         UNDER THE SERVICING AGREEMENT AND BASED UPON MY KNOWLEDGE AND THE
         ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REVIEW REQUIRED UNDER THE AGREEMENT, AND EXCEPT AS
         DISCLOSED IN THE REPORTS, THE SERVICER HAS FULFILLED ITS OBLIGATIONS
         UNDER THE AGREEMENT; AND

5.       THE REPORTS DISCLOSE ALL SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES RELATING TO THE
         SERVICER'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS BASED UPON
         THE REPORT PROVIDED BY AN INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT, AFTER
         CONDUCTING A REVIEW IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION
         PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS OR SIMILAR PROCEDURE AS SET FORTH IN THE
         AGREEMENT, THAT IS INCLUDED IN THESE REPORTS.

                                                 HOMEQ SERVICING CORPORATION

                                                 BY: /S/ ARTHUR Q. LYON
                                                         NAME: ARTHUR Q. LYON
                                                         TITLE: PRESIDENT


DATED:  MARCH 28, 2003
255 La. 1102

#### Gay Cooper ROCKHOLD v. James Albert ROCKHOLD.

No. 50481.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 4, 1970.

In re: Gay Cooper Rockhold applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

FOURNET, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.

HAMLIN, J.,

concurs in the denial of the application. It does not appear that the trial judge has abused his discretion. Further, the judgment is elastic and the mother of the child may always apply for a revision of the judgment or order if the welfare of the child is affected