alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3592 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to clarify the 

authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection with respect 

to persons regulated by a State insurance regulator, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2024 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. MANCHIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 

to clarify the authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection with respect to persons regulated by 

a State insurance regulator, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Business of Insurance 

5 Regulatory Reform Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3592 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION TO THE AUTHORITY OF THE BU2 REAU WITH RESPECT TO PERSONS REGU3 LATED BY A STATE INSURANCE REGULATOR. 

4 Section 1027(f) of the Consumer Financial Protec5 tion Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5517(f)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

7 (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking 

8 ‘‘DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘EXCEPTIONS’’; 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘Paragraph (1)’’ and in11 serting the following: 

12 ‘‘(A) AUTHORITY.—Paragraph (1)’’; and 

13 (C) by inserting after subparagraph (A), 

14 as so designated, the following: 

15 ‘‘(B) LIMITATION.—With respect to a per16 son regulated by a State insurance regulator— 

17 ‘‘(i) if that person is offering or pro18 viding a consumer financial product or 

19 service, the Bureau may not enforce this 

20 title with respect to that person to the ex21 tent that the person is engaged in the busi22 ness of insurance; or 

23 ‘‘(ii) if that person is subject to any 

24 enumerated consumer law or any law for 

25 which authorities are transferred under 

26 subtitle F or H, the authority of the BuVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:07 Jan 18, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3592.IS S3592

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3592 IS

1 reau to enforce that law with respect to 

2 that person shall be narrowly construed to 

3 the extent that the person is engaged in 

4 the business of insurance.’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The enforce7 ment of this title shall be broadly construed in favor 

8 of the authority of a State insurance regulator with 

9 respect to a person regulated by the State insurance 

10 regulator.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Edna McClave RYDER, Petitioner, v. Nellie Larsen MacKENZIE, Respondent.

No. 39777.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 13, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 235 So.2d 36.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.
From: <helmm@pjm.com> 
To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 
Date: 10/12/2012 10:45 AM 
Subject: FW: Various DR reports
 
 
 
Melanie, 
 
Very nice speaking with you today. Following up to our conversation, attached are a number reports that hopefully 
will be informative. There are 4 documents regarding DR use in the recent hot weather, and one document entitled 
load management performance report that includes a listing of historical emergency DR events. 
 
Please contact me with any questions/comments. Hope you have a nice weekend. 
 
Regards, 
 
Gary 
 
M. Gary Helm 
Sr. Market Strategist 
PJM Interconnection, LLC 
helmm@pjm.com 
phone: 610-666-2273 
cell: 302-275-5235 
 
 
(See attached file: load-management-performance-report-2011-2012.ashx.pdf)(See attached file: 
20120718-load-management-dr-event-key-times-and-hours.ashx.pdf)(See attached file: 20120717-
load-management-dr-event-key-times-and-hours.ashx.pdf)(See attached file: pjm-hot-days-report-
for-july-2-july-8-2012.ashx.pdf)(See attached file: pjm-hot-days-report-july-16-18-2012.ashx.pdf)
255 La. 479

#### Mary O. NILES v. AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 50360.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 27, 1970.

In re: -American Bankers Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of . review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 229 So.2d 435.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law1 in its judgment.

■ McCALEB, J., concurs in the refusal of the application.

SUMMERS, J., concurs in the refusal to grant writs.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 8, 2007 |  | /s/ ROBERT J. HALLIDAY                              
|                   |  | Robert J. Halliday                                  
|                   |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RUSSELL HARABURDA, DOC #S39871, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D17-1292 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 12, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Debra Johnes Riva, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Russell Haraburda, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
#### M & W IRON WORKS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. James A. BROWN d/b/a Jim’s Gulf Service, Gulf Oil Corporation, Hartford Insurance Co., South-Eastern Machine Co., Inc., a Florida corporation, Kenneth R. Maurer and Hugh B. Cramer d/b/a Cramer and Maurer, Appellees.

No. 69-750.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stephen R. Booher, Judge, dismissed as to Appellee-Gulf Oil Corporation only.
- filed at

Case 11-22845-JAD Doc 360 Filed 02/26/16 Entered 02/26/16 16:07:23 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 8
Case 11-22845-JAD Doc 360 Filed 02/26/16 Entered 02/26/16 16:07:23 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 8
Case 11-22845-JAD Doc 360 Filed 02/26/16 Entered 02/26/16 16:07:23 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 8
Case 11-22845-JAD Doc 360 Filed 02/26/16 Entered 02/26/16 16:07:23 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 8
Case 11-22845-JAD Doc 360 Filed 02/26/16 Entered 02/26/16 16:07:23 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 8
Case 11-22845-JAD Doc 360 Filed 02/26/16 Entered 02/26/16 16:07:23 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 8
FILED

CLERK

U.S. BANKRUPTCY

COURT - WDPA 2/26/16 3:54 pm

Case 11-22845-JAD Doc 360 Filed 02/26/16 Entered 02/26/16 16:07:23 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 8
Case 11-22845-JAD Doc 360 Filed 02/26/16 Entered 02/26/16 16:07:23 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 8
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55282-55283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28121]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Scientific Computing; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Scientific Computing 
(#1185).
    Date and Time: November 13, 1997, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 
1120, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. John Van Rosendale, Program Director, New 
Technologies Program, Suite 1122, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-1962.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide recommendations and advice 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.

[[Page 55283]]

    Agenda: Panel review of the New Technologies Program proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b)(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-28121 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
conjunction with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Fuel
Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”),
 
 I, Stuart
D. Beath, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: 
      May 7, 2009
                    
                    By.
                    /s/
      Stuart D.
    BeathName:
                    Stuart
      D. BeathTitle:
                    Chief
      Financial
Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 5, 2008 |  |  |  | /S/ ROBERT J. HALLIDAY                              
|                      |  |  |  | Robert J. Halliday                                  
|                      |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Devasis Ghose, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 28, 2005



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Devasis Ghose                                   
|Devasis Ghose                                       
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
U.S. D.EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASIDNGTON, D.C. •. ·• i~ 

IN THE MA TfER OF: 

JAMES KEARNS 

Respondent. 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0683 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

FAA Case No. 201280275132 

JOINT MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE 

The parties, by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to section 13.218 of the Rules 

of Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions, requests that the law judge continue the Rule 16 

Litigation Scheduling ConJerence set for January 13, 2015, in the above-captioned matter. In 

support thereof, the parties state the following: 

On Friday, January 9, 2015, the parties reached a settlement in principle and are currently 

working on drafting settlement documents to memorialize the settlement terms. Upon execution 

of a settlement agreement in the matter, the Complainant intends to withdraw the Complaint 

pursuant to 14 C.P.R. 13.215 by January 30, 20'15. 
In light of the settlement of this matter, the parties respectfully request that the law judge 

enter an order continuing the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling c.onference ctu:rently set for January 

13, 2015, to a later date to give the parties an opportunity to finalize the settlement documents. 

Respectfully submitted this 9th day of January 2015. 

RA (!AWN RICH GEORGE 

Senior Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

JOHN 0. . MOSS, Esq. 

Attorney for Respondent 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Joint Motion for Continuance was mailed via 

facsimile and Federal Express to: 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

DOT, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room El2~320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

(FAX) (202) 366-7536 

and via Federal Express to: 

JohnO.C. Moss, Esq. 

Moss & Moss, LLP 

220 Fifth Avenue~ Suite 900 

New York, New York 1 0001 

and 

James Kearns 

270 Union Street, Apt. 2 

Brooklyn, NY 11231 

and the original and one copy via Federal Express to: 

Hearing Docket 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M~ 30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room Wl2-140 

1200 New Jersey A venue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

, 1 ~{MA};f/Ja}dr vv~ TIFFANY M. McDOWELL 

Legal Assistant 

Office of the Regional Cow1sel 

-JAN - 9 2015 

Dated
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,992
<SECURITIES>                                    55,123
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                       187
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,472
<PP&E>                                          10,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           211
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,834
<SALES>                                         15,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,560
<CGS>                                            9,892
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,892
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,915
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    45
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,952)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,952)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)


</TABLE>
#### Ex parte Nan S. SLEPIAN.

No. 77-248.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 3, 1978.

SHORES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 21


                            HOST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                             LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


<S>                                                            <C>  

                      DOMESTIC                                                       FOREIGN
-----------------------------------------------------        ---------------------------------------------------------

State:  California                                           Country:  Australia
    The Gift Collection, Inc.                                     Marriott Airport Concessions Pty Ltd.
    Host Gifts, Inc.                                              Host Services Pty Ltd.

State:  Delaware                                             Country:  Canada
    Michigan Host, Inc.                                           Host International of Canada, Ltd.
    Host Services of New York, Inc.
    Las Vegas Terminal Restaurants, Inc.                     Country:  Malaysia
    Turnpike Restaurants, Inc.                                    Host (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
    Host Marriott Services U.S.A., Inc.
    HMS Holdings, Inc.                                       Country:  The Netherlands
    Cincinnati Terminal Services, Inc.                            Horeca Exploitative Maatschappij Schiphol, B.V.
    Cleveland Airport Services, Inc.                              Host of Holland, B.V.
    Marriott Airport Terminal Services, Inc.
    HMS B&L, Inc.                                            Country:  China
                                                                  Shenzhen Host Catering Company, Ltd.
State:  Florida
    Sunshine Parkway Restaurants, Inc.                       Country:  France
                                                                  Host Services (France) SAS
State:  Kansas
    Host International, Inc. of Kansas

State:  Maryland
    Host International, Inc. of Maryland
    Host Marriott Services Family Restaurants, Inc.

State:  Ohio
    Gladieux Corporation

State:  Texas
    Host Services, Inc.

</TABLE>






                                      E-1
N o r th C o a s t U n i f i e d S i s k i y o u M o d o c

S h a s t a L a s s e n

T

e h am a N o r th e rn S i e rr a B u t t e M e n d o c i n o G l e n n
F e a t h e r R i v e r L ak e C o l u s a P l a c e r

Y

o l o - S o l an o N o r th e rn S o n o m a

B ay A r e a S a c r am e n t o M e tr o A m a d o r C a l av e r a s T

u o l u m n e

S an J o a qu i n V

a l l e y U n i f i e d M ar i p o s a

M o n t e r e y B ay U n i f i e d

E a s t e r n K e r n S an L u i s O b i s p o
S an t a B arb a r a V e n tur a A n t e l o p e V

a l l e y

S an D i e g o I mp e r i a l M o j av e D e s e r t E l D o r a d o

G r e a t B a s i n U n i f i e d

S o u th C o a s t

0 5 0 1 0 0 M i l e s 

# . 2 0 0 8 8

- H o u r O z o n e N A A Q S D e s i g n a t i o n s N o n a t t a i n m e n t/ E x t r e m e N o n a t t a i n m e n t/ S e v e r e - 1 5 N o n a t t a i n m e n t/ S e r i o u s N o n a t t a i n m e n t/ M o d e r a t e N o n a t t a i n m e n t/ M a r g i n a l U n c l a s s i f i a

b l e / A t t a i n m e n t P S D P r o g r a m S t a t u s S I P A p p r o v e d E P A P e r m i t t i n g A u th o r i ty F I P D e l e g a t i o n A i r D i s tr i c t B o un d a r y 

## C A L I F O RN I A P S D S T A T U S A S O F S E P T E M B E R 9 , 2 0 1 4 2 0 0 8 8

- H O U R O Z O N E D E S I G N A T I O N S

A I R 1 4 0 0 0 7 4

_ 2

. mx d ( S e p t e m b e r 9 , 2 0 1 4 ) S o u

r c e s : E P A ( 2 0 1 4 ) , T A

N A ( 2 0 0 6 )

.
No. 9706.

#### Hempstead et al. *v.*Fisher, Auditor, et al.

(Decided October 23, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Clinton County.

*Mr. D. K. Hempstead,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Joe T. Doan*and *Mr. G. P. Thorpe,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                            APPLIEDTHEORY CORPORATION

                  CALCULATION OF LOSS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED) (1)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                 JUNE 30, 1999
                                                                                 -------------

<S>                                                                                <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
       Shares outstanding at beginning of period                                   15,970,181
       Weighted average shares issued during three months
       ended June 30, 1999 (5,177,721 shares)                                       3,470,418
                                                                                 ------------
                                                                                   19,440,599
                                                                                 ============

Net loss                                                                         $(2,315,000)
                                                                                 ============

Loss per share attributable to common stockholders                               $     (0.12)
                                                                                 ============
</TABLE>





(1)  For a discussion of loss per share, see Note B of the Notes to the
     Financial Statements provided in Part I, Item 1 of our Form 10-Q for the
     period ending June 30, 1999.