Page 1 of 31

NORTH DAKOTA 

2022 ANNUAL REPORT 

Disclaimer: This report is the property of the State Department of Transportation (State DOT). The State DOT 

completes the report by entering applicable information into the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Highway 

Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) online reporting tool. Once the State DOT completes the report pertaining to its 

State, it coordinates with its respective FHWA Division Office to ensure the report meets all legislative and regulatory 

requirements. FHWA’s Headquarters Office of Safety then downloads the State’s finalized report and posts it to the 

website (https://highways.dot.gov/safety/hsip/reporting) as required by law (23 U.S.C. 148(h)(3)(A)). 
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 2 of 31

Table of Contents

Disclaimer .............................................................................................................................................3

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence .............................................................3

Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................4

Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................5

Program Structure ................................................................................................................................. 5

Program Administration .....................................................................................................................5

Program Methodology .......................................................................................................................7

Project Implementation .......................................................................................................................10

Funds Programmed .........................................................................................................................10

General Listing of Projects ..............................................................................................................12

Safety Performance ............................................................................................................................15

General Highway Safety Trends ......................................................................................................15

Safety Performance Targets............................................................................................................20

Applicability of Special Rules...........................................................................................................22

Evaluation ...........................................................................................................................................23

Program Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................23

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements .......................................................23

Project Effectiveness .......................................................................................................................26

Compliance Assessment.....................................................................................................................27

Optional Attachments ..........................................................................................................................30

Glossary ..............................................................................................................................................31
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 3 of 31

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence 

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or 

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action 

for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, 

schedules, lists, or other data.” 

23 U.S.C. 407 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data 

compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential 

accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, 

and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement project 

which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted 

into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for 

damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, 

schedules, lists, or data.” 
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 4 of 31

Executive Summary

The North Dakota HSIP is administered through the Programming Division in the North Dakota Department of 

Transportation (NDDOT). Safety investments are based on the state’s current Strategic Highway Safety Plan 

(SHSP). The current SHSP document is called ND Vision Zero Plan and has six priority emphasis areas: 

• Lane departure 

• Intersections 

• Alcohol and/or drug related 

• Unbelted vehicle occupants 

• Speeding/aggressive driving 

• Young drivers 

Safety projects are developed by a reactive process (high crash listings, road safety reviews, fatal crash review 

teams) and a systemic process (local road safety plans). Project solicitation takes place every fall and HSIP 

applications are submitted from local agencies and NDDOT district offices. Projects are reviewed for eligibility 

and are then prioritized into the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 5 of 31

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of achieving 

a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 

924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP implementation 

and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the HSIP Reporting Guidance dated 

December 29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, progress in implementing highway safety 

improvement projects, progress in achieving safety outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the 

improvements and compliance assessment. 

Program Structure

Program Administration 

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

The NDDOT solicits state and local agencies to submit safety project applications each year. Potential projects 

are identified through the traditional "reactive" approach that address high crash locations, fatal crash locations 

or areas where road safety reviews took place. Projects are also developed using a "systemic" approach that 

apply low-cost treatments over a large area. The NDDOT central office reviews applications and 

selects/prioritizes. After projects are programmed, they get designed and implemented with the same process 

as regular federally funded transportation projects. Overall evaluation of the program is done though 

monitoring of the fatal and serious injury statistics as part of this annual report. 

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Other-Programming

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

• Central Office via Statewide Competitive Application Process 

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP. 

The NDDOT addresses safety on local and tribal roads through the Local Road Safety Program (LRSP). Local 

public agencies and tribal nations can also submit applications for non-LRSP safety projects each year during 

the solicitation period. Selection of local and tribal road projects use the same methodology as State roads. 

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) 

Bureaus, Divisions) are involved with HSIP planning. 

• Design 

• Districts/Regions 

• Governors Highway Safety Office 

• Local Aid Programs Office/Division 

• Planning 

• Traffic Engineering/Safety 

• Other-Safety Division, Local Government 
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 6 of 31

Describe coordination with internal partners.

Design

The Design Division is included in the distribution of the high crash listings. All road safety reviews require at 

least one member of the Design Division. Their participation and review of at-risk locations helps in the 

development of potential project countermeasures.

Planning

The Planning Division provides data for the development of the HSIP. Roadway features are collected and 

maintained in the Planning Division include: traffic volume, truck volumes, traffic projections, roadway features, 

roadway viewer (for state highways) and mapping. The Planning Division is also included in the distribution of 

the high crash listings.

Safety Highway Safety Office (SHSO)

The SHSO is the lead entity for the State's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and involves law 

enforcement and other partners in the process. In North Dakota, the behavioral strategies in the SHSP are 

largely funded through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) funds with funding going to 

various traffic safety partners including law enforcement agencies statewide for overtime enforcement of traffic 

safety laws. The SHSP process drives HSIP project priorities. Infrastructure strategies in the North Dakota 

SHSP are largely funded through HSIP and deployed through the State's Local Road Safety Program (LRSP) 

and State Road Safety Program (SRSP). These programs identify proven, low-cost road safety strategies and 

prioritize the road safety strategies for implementation at identified at-risk locations on the local and state road 

systems.

Local Government

Members of the Local Government Division provide project development through city, county and tribal 

agencies. The local government assists in the solicitation of safety projects. They also participate in road safety 

reviews.

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning.

• Academia/University

• FHWA

• Law Enforcement Agency

• Local Government Agency 

• Local Technical Assistance Program

• Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs)

• Tribal Agency

• Other-and other traffic safety advocates/partners

Describe coordination with external partners.

All the entities are involved at SHSP at some level (Executive Leadership Team, SHSP Steering Committee, 

SHSP Implementation Team or general SHSP stakeholder).
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 7 of 31

Regional Planning Organizations: North Dakota has 3 MPO's that must approve any HSIP applications that are 

submitted by their respective cities. The MPO's were also included in the team that developed the ND Local 

Road Safety Program (LRSP).

Local Government Agency, Tribal Agency: The cities, counties, and tribal agencies are solicited each year for 

potential safety projects. They are encouraged to submit projects directly from the LRSP or at high crash 

locations.

Law Enforcement Agency: Law enforcement and HSIP personnel are extensively involved in North Dakota's 

SHSP process. The Programming Division Director serves on the SHSP Steering Committee and as 

chairperson for two SHSP emphasis area teams (Lane Departure and Intersection implementation Teams). 

Law enforcement serve at all levels of the SHSP including the SHSP Executive Leadership Team, the SHSP 

Steering Committee and SHSP Implementation Teams.

Describe other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to 

elaborate. 

Schedule for HSIP requests:

• Fall – send out HSIP solicitation letter, HSIP application forms (SFN 59959) are due by the end of the 

year

• Winter – NDDOT analysis of HSIP requests and Draft HSIP project listing

• Spring – verify the construction year for previously approved projects

• Summer – finalize HSIP project listing, send responses out on approvals (or non-approvals) for the 

HSIP applications and send out high crash location lists/maps

• August 31st – Final HSIP project list due to FHWA, HSIP online reporting due

Program Methodology

Does the State have an HSIP manual or similar that clearly describes HSIP planning, 

implementation and evaluation processes?

Yes

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP.

• HSIP (no subprograms)

Program: HSIP (no subprograms)

Date of Program Methodology:3/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 8 of 31

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes • Traffic • Horizontal curvature

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Equivalent property damage only (EPDO Crash frequency)

• Other-Systemic

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Competitive application process

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Available funding:1

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements?

 57

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic 

improvements? 

• Cable Median Barriers

• Horizontal curve signs

• Install/Improve Lighting

• Install/Improve Pavement Marking and/or Delineation

• Install/Improve Signing

• Rumble Strips

• Traffic Control Device Rehabilitation

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

• Crash data analysis
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 9 of 31

• Engineering Study

• Road Safety Assessment

• SHSP/Local road safety plan

• Stakeholder input

• Other-National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) and other evidence-based practices

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

Yes

Describe how the State HSIP considers connected vehicles and ITS technologies. 

The NDDOT has implemented the ITS technology of ICWS (Intersection Conflict Warning Systems). One of 

the 2022 HSIP projects will install environmental sensor stations (ESS) to show messages on message boards 

and possibly to vehicles (V2i).

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts?

No

NDDOT is currently working on integrating the HSM into its HSIP process using AASHTO software.
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 10 of 31

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed 

Reporting period for HSIP funding. 

Federal Fiscal Year

2022 Federal Fiscal Year (Oct 1, 2021 through July 26, 2022) 

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category.

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % 

OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $29,132,380 $15,599,460 53.55%

HRRR Special Rule (23 

U.S.C. 148(g)(1))

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

154)

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

164)

$5,722,242 $5,722,242 100%

RHCP (for HSIP 

purposes) (23 U.S.C. 

130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds 

(i.e. STBG, NHPP)

$0 $0 0%

State and Local Funds $0 $0 0%

Totals $34,854,622 $21,321,702 61.17%

2022 Federal Fiscal Year (as of July 26, 2022)* 

*9.7M Remaining HSIP apportionment is planned to be obligated by the end of 2022 Federal Fiscal Year. 

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal 

safety projects? 

$1,154,000

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects? 

$3,662,000

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$483,000

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$720,000
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 11 of 31

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas 

during the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$0

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during 

the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$0

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in 

the future.

None
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 12 of 31

General Listing of Projects 

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period. 

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

22715: 

Stanley Ped 

Crossings

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Modify existing 

crosswalk

15 Intersections $35000 $39000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

22829: 

Burdick 

Expwy to 

Evergreen 

Ave

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection 

geometry - other

1 Intersections $1860000 $2744000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther18,195 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

23155: 

Bismarck 

Burlington to 

Main Ave

Lighting Continuous 

roadway lighting

1.34 Miles $489000 $543000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther14,285 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Older Drivers

23425: 

Various 

Hwys - 

Standing 

Rock 

Reservation

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $78000 $86000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

23426: 

Various 

Hwys - 

Bismarck 

District

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $1128000 $1253000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

23427: 

Various 

Hwys - 

Valley City 

District

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $871000 $968000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

23430: 

Various 

Hwys - 

Dickinson 

District

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $1453000 $1614000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

23431: 

Various 

Hwys - 

Grand Forks 

District

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $1425000 $1583000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 13 of 31

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

23433: 

Various 

Hwys - Fargo 

District

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $987000 $1097000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

23269: US 

85 ESS

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS - other

1 Locations $251000 $228000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther6,435 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

23423: 

Various 

Hwys - Spirit 

Lake 

Reservation

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $49000 $49000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

23424: 

Various 

Hwys - Fort 

Berthold 

Reservation

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $305000 $339000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

23428: 

Various 

Hwys - 

Devils Lake 

District

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $901000 $1001000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

23429: 

Various 

Hwys - Minot 

District

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $1071000 $1190000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

23432: 

Various 

Hwys - 

Grand Forks 

District

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $703000 $781000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

23437: US 

281 - Turtle 

Mount 

Reservation

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $44000 $44000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

22831: 

Bowman, W 

of 3rd Ave 

SE

Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

2 Intersections $943000 $1047000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther2,595 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Speeding or 

Aggressive 

Drivers

22832: US 

85 & 38th St 

SW

Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

1 Intersections $575000 $639000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther1,936 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

21874: 

McKenzie 

Co.- Charlie 

Alignment Horizontal and 

vertical alignment

0.67 Miles $2518000 $2797000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Local Road or 

Street

78 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 14 of 31

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

Bob Creek 

Road
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 15 of 31

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends 

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five 

years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Fatalities 148 135 131 113 116 105 100 100 101

Serious Injuries 517 519 555 434 433 361 379 386 467

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

1.470 1.280 1.310 1.160 1.190 1.070 1.020 1.140 1.090

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

5.120 4.940 5.530 4.460 4.460 3.660 3.860 4.420 5.030

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

2 12 8 10 7 8 7 9 11

Number of nonmotorized serious 

injuries

30 32 31 21 24 28 21 20 36
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 16 of 31

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Annual Fatalities

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Annual Serious Injuries

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 17 of 31

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 18 of 31

Describe fatality data source. 

State Motor Vehicle Crash Database

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and 

ownership. 

Year 2021

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Interstate

8.6 28.6 0.56 1.9

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other

26.2 76.6 1.23 3.64

Rural Minor Arterial 12.8 34 1.62 4.33

Rural Minor Collector

Rural Major Collector 20.2 65.8 1.93 6.32

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Fatalities Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 19 of 31

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Local Road or 

Street

18 57.4 1.59 5.11

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

0.6 7.8 1.51

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other

7.4 53.6 0.9 6.54

Urban Minor Arterial 5.6 33.2 0.91 5.3

Urban Minor Collector

Urban Major Collector 1.6 14.8 0.56 5.18

Urban Local Road or 

Street

3 23.2 0.51 4.03
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 20 of 31

Year 2021

Roadways Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

State Highway 

Agency

59.4 206.4

County Highway 

Agency

24.2 81

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City or Municipal 

Highway Agency

9.4 74.2

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

4.2 4.2

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority

Local Toll Authority

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, 

University)

Indian Tribe Nation

Safety Performance Targets 

Safety Performance Targets 

Calendar Year 2023 Targets *

Number of Fatalities:99.2

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Review of historical data and expert group input. The current NDDOT SHSP has a short term goal of fewer 

than 75 fatalities by 2025. The target set for 2023 matches this trend line. 
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 21 of 31

Number of Serious Injuries:397.1

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Review of historical data and expert group input.

Fatality Rate:1.080

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Review of historical data and expert group input.

Serious Injury Rate:4.201

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Review of historical data and expert group input.

Total Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries:33.5

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Review of historical data and expert group input.

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish 

safety performance targets. 

The State Highway Safety Office (SHSO) resides in the NDDOT. The SHSO (i.e., the NDDOT Safety Division) 

and other NDDOT Divisions including Local Government, Programming and planning/Asset Management 

review performance measure data and define the method to set the targets. Proposed targets are then shared 

by the NDDOT at a regular meeting between NDDOT and the MPOs.

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

Describe progress toward meeting the State’s 2022 Safety Performance Targets (based 

on data available at the time of reporting). For each target, include a discussion of any 

reasons for differences in the actual outcomes and targets.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES TARGETS ACTUALS

Number of Fatalities 102.0 104.4

Number of Serious Injuries 382.1 405.2

Fatality Rate 1.103 1.102

Serious Injury Rate 4.046 4.286

Non-Motorized Fatalities and 

Serious Injuries

30.4 34.2

The NDDOT set lofty targets in 2021, but came up short on a few of them. Even though we didn’t meet some 

of our targets we still met the baseline data for most of the performance targets. We did see an increase in 
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 22 of 31

serious injuries in the state this year, but our fatalities continued to be about the same as previous years. We 

will continue to push for lofty targets and strategies to get us to them.

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

No

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries 65 

years of age and older for the past seven years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Fatalities

11 9 14 19 17 16 13

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Serious 

Injuries

37 36 28 29 39 23 40
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 23 of 31

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness 

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP? 

• Change in fatalities and serious injuries 

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of 

the State's program level evaluations. 

In the last few years, the number of fatalities and the fatality rate has plateaued. Serious injuries are rising 

along with the serious injury rate. Since these measures of effectiveness is statewide data, the numbers may 

be hiding any successes that are occurring due to individual safety projects. More detailed project level 

evaluations may be necessary in the future to determine which treatments are working and which are not. 

Nevertheless, the overall trends are a concern, and the data is being investigated with NDDOT’s upcoming 

revision of its SHSP. 

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and 

success of the Highway Safety Improvement Program? 

• # miles improved by HSIP 

• Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process 

• Increased focus on local road safety 

• More systemic programs 

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements 

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures. 

Year 2021

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Lane Departure All 61 219 0.64 2.32

Intersections All 23.2 136.2 0.24 1.44

Unbelted Vehicle 

Occupants

All 40 103 0.42 1.09

Speeding/Aggressive 

Drivers

All 35.6 163.4 0.38 1.72

Young Drivers All 5.8 37.8 0.06 0.4
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 24 of 31

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average

2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 25 of 31

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 26 of 31

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 27 of 31

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative? 

 09/18/2018

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP? 

From: 2018 To: 2023

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update? 

 2023

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

*Based on Functional Classification (MIRE 1.0 Element Number) [MIRE 2.0 Element Number]

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY SEGMENT Segment Identifier 

(12) [12]

100 100 75 75 75 75

Route Number (8) 

[8]

20 20

Route/Street Name 

(9) [9]

100 100

Federal Aid/Route 

Type (21) [21]

20 20

Rural/Urban 

Designation (20) [20]

100 100 100 100

Surface Type (23) 

[24]

100 100 100 100

Begin Point 

Segment Descriptor 

(10) [10]

100 100 75 75 75 75

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11) [11]

100 100 75 75 75 75

Segment Length 

(13) [13]

100 100

Direction of 

Inventory (18) [18]

100 100

Functional Class 

(19) [19]

100 100 100 100 100 100
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 28 of 31

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Median Type (54) 

[55]

20 20

Access Control (22) 

[23]

20 20

One/Two Way 

Operations (91) [93]

100 100

Number of Through 

Lanes (31) [32]

100 100 100 100

Average Annual 

Daily Traffic (79) [81]

100 100 100 100

AADT Year (80) [82] 100 100

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4) [4]

100 100 100 100 100 100

INTERSECTION Unique Junction 

Identifier (120) [110]

40 40

Location Identifier 

for Road 1 Crossing 

Point (122) [112]

40 40

Location Identifier 

for Road 2 Crossing 

Point (123) [113]

40 40

Intersection/Junction 

Geometry (126) 

[116]

40 40

Intersection/Junction 

Traffic Control (131) 

[131]

5 5

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road 

(79) [81]

40 40

AADT Year (80) [82] 40 40

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139) [129]

5 5

INTERCHANGE/RAMP Unique Interchange 

Identifier (178) [168]

85 85

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

85 85
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 29 of 31

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (197) [187]

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201) [191]

85 85

Ramp Length (187) 

[177]

85 85

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195) [185]

85 85

Roadway Type at 

End Ramp Terminal 

(199) [189]

85 85

Interchange Type 

(182) [172]

85 85

Ramp AADT (191) 

[181]

85 85

Year of Ramp AADT 

(192) [182]

85 85

Functional Class 

(19) [19]

85 85

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4) [4]

85 85

Totals (Average Percent Complete): 82.22 82.22 31.25 31.25 85.00 85.00 91.67 91.67 85.00 85.00

*Based on Functional Classification (MIRE 1.0 Element Number) [MIRE 2.0 Element Number]

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026. 

The NDDOT has developed the following goals to meet MIRE requirements and future road data management: 

• The database for two FDE: “Median Type (54)” and “Intersection/Junction Traffic Control (131)” need to be updated. 

• Develop a robust/integrated data warehouse to connect all geodatabased items with each other 

• More efficiently and effectively extract information from the database: 

o Querying will be the initial capability of data warehouse 

o Develop a framework that allows tools and models to be shared by NDDOT 

o Application of AI/ML-based techniques over the data warehouse 

• The data warehouse will be an efficient framework for data governance in NDDOT 

o Other geo-databases (safety, construction, maintenance, etc.) could be integrated into the data warehouse
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 31

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

HSIP Guidebook 2021.pdf

Project Implementation:

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

Compliance Assessment:
2022 North Dakota Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 31 of 31

Glossary

5 year rolling average: means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data 

(e.g. annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area: means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process.

Highway safety improvement project: means strategies, activities and projects on a public road 

that are consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous 

road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem.

HMVMT: means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects: are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule: applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which 

data are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013.

Performance measure: means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to 

monitor changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and 

objectives.

Programmed funds: mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification: means the process by which streets and highways are 

grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP): means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on 

safety data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148.

Systematic: refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across 

a system.

Systemic safety improvement: means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high 

risk roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types.

Transfer: means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.