alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005072EN.01000301.xml

| 18.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 72/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 72/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 435/2005

of 17 March 2005

applying a reduction coefficient to refund certificates for goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, as provided for by Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 of 6 December 1993 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 of 13 July 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds (2), and in particular Article 8(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Member States' notifications pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 indicate that the total amount of applications received reaches EUR 178 002 906 while the available amount for the tranche of refund certificates as referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 is EUR 68 116 869. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Member States' notifications pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 indicate that the total amount of applications received reaches EUR 178 002 906 while the available amount for the tranche of refund certificates as referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 is EUR 68 116 869.

| (2) | A reduction coefficient shall be calculated on the basis of Article 8(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000. Such coefficient should therefore be applied to amounts requested in the form of refund certificates for use from 1 April 2005 as established in Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A reduction coefficient shall be calculated on the basis of Article 8(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000. Such coefficient should therefore be applied to amounts requested in the form of refund certificates for use from 1 April 2005 as established in Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The amounts for applications of refund certificates for use from 1 April 2005 are subject to a reduction coefficient of 0,618.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 March 2005.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 318, 20.12.1993, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2580/2000 (OJ L 298, 25.11.2000, p. 5).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 177, 15.7.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 886/2004 (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 14).

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55228-55229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-17-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

October 17, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 9, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch Gateway), P.O. Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77251-1478, filed in 
Docket No. CP98-17-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205, 157.211, 
and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.211, 157.216) for approval to abandon three 
delivery taps and establish two new delivery taps, under the blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-430-000 pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is 
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Koch Gateway states that the certificate authorization for the 
construction and operation of the taps which Koch Gateway now seeks 
abandonment authorization was issued in FPC Docket No. G-232. Koch 
Gateway states that these taps are used for delivery of natural gas to 
end-users on behalf of Louisiana Gas Service Company (LGS) a local 
distribution Company, in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana. Service will be 
continued to the affected end-users through new taps on an adjacent 
Koch Gateway pipeline. Koch Gateway asserts that LGC concurs with the 
proposed abandonment and tie-over measures.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest shall be deemed to be authorized effective 
the day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is 
filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for 
filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as an

[[Page 55229]]

application for authorization pursuant to section 7 of the Natural Gas 
Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28036 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54007-54008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27515]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-136, RM-9083 and RM-9136]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Ironton, Malden and Salem, MO

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; Order to Show Cause.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In response to a counterproposal filed by B.B.C., Inc. and 
Dockins Communications, Inc., we have issued an Order to Show Cause to 
the Ultra-Sonic Broadcast Stations, Inc., licensee of Station KMMC, 
Channel 240A, Salem, Missouri. This document affords Station KMMC an 
opportunity to object to the proposed channel change but it does not 
afford an additional opportunity to comment on the merits of the 
proposal set forth in the Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Order to 
Show Cause or the proposal advanced in the counterproposal. See 62 FR 
29090, May 29, 1997.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before November 24, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC. 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Order 
to Show Cause, MM Docket No. 97-136, adopted September 24, 1997, and 
released October 3, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 
20036, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.

[[Page 54008]]

    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-27515 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
# L_2005052EN.01001501.xml

| 25.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 52/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 52/15

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 309/2005

of 24 February 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 22 February 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 22 February 2005.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 22 February 2005, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 31,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58.

3

---
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1648

___________

United States of America, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Missouri.

Anthony D. Perkins, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant - Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: October 13, 2008

Filed: March 10, 2009

___________

Before MELLOY, BEAM, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

The appellant in this case was sentenced as an armed career criminal. While it

appears Mr. Perkins may have two qualifying offenses for armed career criminal

status, that is, two robbery convictions, the third qualifying predicate is for auto

tampering. Our court has now determined that auto tampering is not a crime of

violence for purposes of armed career offender status. See United States v. Williams,

537 F.3d 969 (8th Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, the sentence is reversed and the matter remanded for resentencing

in accordance with Williams.

______________________________
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
      CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of ICC Worldwide,
      Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2008,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Periodic Report"), we, Richard K. Lauer, President and Chief Executive Officer,
      and Scott K Anderson, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of our Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of our
      Company.




ICC
                WORLDWIDE, INC.Date:
                September 16, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Richard
                K LauerRichard
                K LauerPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer




Date:
                September 16, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Scott
                K Anderson, Jr.Scott
                K Anderson, Jr.Chief
                Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dominos Pizza, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 10, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. David Mounts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ L. David MountsL. David MountsChief Financial Officer


Dated: October 9, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dominos Pizza, Inc. and will be retained by Dominos Pizza, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### U.S. EPA FACT SHEET

Yuba City

- Marysville Area Redesignation to Attain ment for the 2006 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standard

November 20, 2014

Summary

 EPA is redesignating the Yuba City

- Marysville area of California to attainment for the 2006 fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) 24

- hour National Ambient Air Quality Standar d ( NAAQS ).

 EPA is approving the California Air Resources Board’s redesignation request, maintenance plan, emissions inventory and motor vehicles budgets.

 Today’s actions represent a significant milestone in air quality improvement s through the combined efforts of the Feather River Air Quality Management District, the California Air Resources Board, and EPA.

Background

 In January 2013, EPA issued a determination that the Yuba City

- Marysville nonattainment area attained the 2006 24

- hour PM 2.5 standard based on complete, quality

assured, and certified ambient air monitoring data for the 2009

– 2011 monitoring period.

Particulate Matter and Public Health

 Particulate matter are commonly referred to as PM 2.5 because they have a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less.

 Reducing PM 2.5 levels is essential because these tiny particles can reach the deepest regions of the lungs and exposure is linked to a variety of significant health problems including damage to lung tissue, cancer and premature death.

 PM 2.5 can be emitted directly into the atmosphere or formed in the atmosph ere as a result of various chemical reactions from emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and ammonia.

Next Steps

 Today’s actions will be published in the Federal Register in approximately two weeks and become effective 30 day s after publication

.

For More Information:

http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/actions/calwide/index.html
254 La. 929

#### John ISTRE v. DIAMOND M. DRILLING COMPANY et al.

No. 50182.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 15, 1969.

In re: John Istre applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Iberia. 226 So.2d 779.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### Patricia Ann SHANKS, Appellant, v. Nelson Frank BROTHERS, Appellee.

No. 69-276.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 9, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 13, 1970.

Robert F. Nunez and Helen K. Hobbs, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

G. Robert Schultz, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

LILES, Judge.

Johnnie Lee Shanks, a minor pedestrian, was struck and killed by an automobile owned and driven by Nelson Frank Brothers, an uninsured motorist. The deceased minor was survived by his mother, appellant here, who at the time of the accident had a policy of insurance with Allstate Insurance Company which included uninsured motorist coverage.

Under the terms of the uninsured motorist coverage and following arbitration, an order was entered on April 21, 1967, compelling Allstate Insurance Company to pay the mother of Johnnie Lee Shanks the sum of $6,500 which Allstate paid in full. On August 9, 1967, Allstate caused to be filed a suit in the name of Patricia Ann Shanks, individually, and for the use and benefit of Allstate Insurance Company against the defendant, Nelson Frank *502Brothers. This suit was subsequently dismissed by voluntary dismissal on the part of Mrs. Shanks. A new complaint was filed on September 19,. 1968, and was attacked by the defendant on the grounds that the two year statute of limitations covering death actions had run. This appeal ensued.

Appellant maintains that the court erred in dismissing the last complaint in that it was error to apply the two year statute of limitations governing wrongful death actions rather than applying the three year statute of limitations controlling rights arising under Section 627.0851, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Section 95.11(5) (a), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., allows three years for an action to be brought upon a liability created by statute. Section 95.11(6), Fla. Stat, F.S.A., provides two years for bringing a wrongful death action. We believe the court erred in applying Section 95.11 (6), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and we reverse.

Section 627.0851(4), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., provides:

> “In the event of payment to any person under the coverage required by this section and subject to the terms and conditions of such coverage, the insurer making such payment shall, to the extent thereof, be entitled to the proceeds of any settlement or judgment resulting from the exercise of any rights or recovery of such person against any person or organization legally responsible for the bodily injury for which such payment is made * *

The statute quoted above creates an indemnification right brought about by that particular statute and since the right of indemnification did not arise until Allstate paid Mrs. Shanks her award, the statute of limitations did not begin to run until then. At that point Allstate had three years pursuant to Section 95.11(5) (a), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., in which to bring its action. Therefore, to apply the wrongful death statute of limitations was error.

For these reasons we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

HOBSON, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
#### Henry C. MARTIN, III, Appellant, v. Mary D. Martin BOYNTON, Appellee.

No. 2514.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 24, 1969.

*447Andrew F. O’Connell and Donald J. Sas-ser, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

James M. Adams of Sholts, Adams & Born, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no harmful error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted 
the following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the 
Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

    (1) Collection title: Lag Service Reports.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: AA-12, G-88A.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0005.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: 12/31/97.
    (5) Type of request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Business or other for profit.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 1,200.
    (8) Total annual responses: 1,200.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 120.
    (10) Collection description: The report obtains the current service 
and compensation of an employee not yet reported to the Railroad 
Retirement Board. This lag information is used to determine eligibility 
for and amount of annuity applied for and to pay benefits due on a 
deceased employee's earnings.

Additional Information or Comments

    Copies of the forms and supporting documents can be obtained from 
Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance officer (312-751-3363). Comments 
regarding the information collection should be addressed to Ronald J. 
Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, 
Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10230, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-28064 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M