alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J.L. McIntosh Letters


 
Exhibit 10(u)

 


 
501 MERRITT 7, P.O. BOX 4500, NORWALK, CT 06856-4500 
 

	 PETER C. KOSCHE
	  	 April 12, 2002

	 Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs
	  
	 Phone:
	 	 203-750-2814
	  
	 Fax:
	 	 203-750-3205
	  
	 E-mail:
	 	 pckosche@corp.olin.com
	  

 
Mr. John McIntosh 
2008 Woodchase Way, NE 
Cleveland, TN 37311 
 
Dear John: 
 
This letter serves to confirm and clarify Olin’s commitment to lend you up to $60,000. The terms and conditions of this loan are as
follows: 
 

	 	•	 	The term of the loan will be five years 

 

	 	•	 	No interest shall accrue on the outstanding principal balance if paid before the five year term has expired. 

 

	 	•	 	Principal on this note shall be repaid in installments or full beginning twelve months after the loan has been executed. 

 

	 	•	 	Interest will accrue on overdue principal at a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the sum of the borrowing rate plus 3% from the due date of such principal. The
borrowing rate shall mean the base rate announced by Citibank, N.A., New York, NY or in the absence of such rate, the market rate as shall be determined by the Chief Financial Officer or Treasurer. 

 

	 	•	 	Repayment date shall mean the earlier of five years from loan execution and/or the date on which you cease for any reason to be on Olin’s active payroll.


 
If you have any questions, please
do not hesitate to call me. 
 
O    L    I    N      C    O    R    P    O  
  R    A    T    I    O    N 
 

	“***	 	Omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the Commission.” 









 
501 MERRITT 7, P.O. BOX 4500, NORWALK, CT 06866-4500 
 
 
PETER C. KOSCHE 
 

	 Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs

	 Phone:
	 	 203-750-2814

	 Fax:  
	 	 203-750-3205

	 E-mail:
	 	 pckosche@corp.olin.com


 
 
April 11, 2002 
 
 
To Whom It May Concern: 
 
 
This serves as a formal commitment that Olin Corporation will lend John L.
McIntosh, SS #[***], up to $60,000.00. This commitment is valid for a period of eighteen months from the date of this letter. 
 
 
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. 
 
 
Sincerely, 
 
/s/    P.C. KOSCHE             
P.C. Kosche 
 

	“***	 	Omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the Commission.”
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS
                                       OF
                   CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY, INC.
                   -----------------------------------------


          I, Robert D. Zimet, Secretary of Charles E. Smith Residential Realty,
Inc. (the "Corporation"), do hereby certify that:

          1.  The Board of Directors of the Corporation, at a meeting of the
Board of Directors held on October 25, 1999, deemed it advisable and in the best
interests of the Corporation and its stockholders to amend the first sentence of
Section 3.01 of the Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Corporation (the "By-
Laws");

          2.  The following resolution was duly adopted by the Board of
Directors pursuant to such unanimous written consent:

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 7.07 of the By-
Laws, Section 3.01 of the By-Laws be, and hereby is, amended by amending the
first sentence to Section 3.01 to read as follows:

                    "SECTION 3.01.  Committees.  The Board of Directors may
                                    ----------
          appoint from among its members an Executive Committee and other
          committees composed of one or more directors and delegate to these
          committees any of the powers of the Board of Directors, except the
          power to declare dividends or other distributions on stock, elect
          directors, issue stock other than as provided in the next sentence,
          recommend to the stockholders any action which requires stockholder
          approval, amend the By-Laws, or approve any merger or share exchange
          which does not require stockholder approval."

          3.  The foregoing resolution amending the By-Laws was duly adopted in
accordance with the provisions of the By-Laws and Section 2-408(c) of the
Maryland General Corporation Law.

                                      E-1
<PAGE>

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Certificate of
Amendment on this 25th day of October, 1999.



                                          /s/ Robert D. Zimet
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Robert D. Zimet
                                          Secretary of Charles E. Smith
                                          Residential Realty, Inc.



[SEAL]

                                       2
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350)**





In
      connection with this Report of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
      Daniels, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
                May 20, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Mark DanielsMark
                DanielsChief
                Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined 

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-41152

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FELIPE RIOS-MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-00-CR-528-1

--------------------

April 10, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Felipe Rios-Mendoza appeals his guilty-plea conviction for

illegal reentry following deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. Rios-Mendoza argues that 1) his 1998 removal was simply

a reinstatement of his 1967 deportation, thereby relieving RiosMendoza of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2)’s penalty enhancement, and

2) the superseding indictment against Rios-Mendoza was defective

because it failed to allege general intent. Rios-Mendoza’s

claims are foreclosed by this court’s precedent. See United
No. 00-41152 

-2-

States v. Nava-Perez, 242 F.3d 277, 279 (5th Cir. 2001); United

States v. Guzman-Ocampo, 236 F.3d 233, 237 (5th Cir. 2000). 

Accordingly, Rios-Mendoza’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

 AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38



SUMMARY OF 2003 TEAM MEMBER 401K RESTORATION AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN

Under the 2003 Team Member 401K Restoration and Profit Sharing Plan (the
"Plan"), a Pool of Funds will be generated based upon a portion of each dollar
of pre-tax income earned above certain progressive earnings per share targets in
fiscal year 2003. Fifty percent of the pool will be used to match any 401K
contributions by team members, up to a maximum of 50% of contributions made by
team members during fiscal year 2003, and 50% of the pool will be placed in the
profit sharing pool to be distributed pro rata according to each team member's
predetermined participation percentage. After the maximum 50% match of 401K
contributions is fully funded, any additional funds in the pool will be placed
in the profit sharing pool. Team member participation percentages are stated as
a percentage of base salary. Participating team members must be employed on or
before December 31, 2002 in order to be eligible. Those hired between July 1,
2002 and December 31, 2002 will receive a pro-rata portion of their individual
participation percentage. Participating team members must be employed by the
Company at the date of the payment in fiscal year 2004.
#### Ex parte Lawrence CRAWFORD.

77-358.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 24, 1978.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.
# L_2005199EN.01009901.xml

| 29.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 199/99 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 199/99

---

COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2005/587/CFSP

of 28 July 2005

extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for the Middle East peace process

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 14, 18(5) and 23(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 8 December 2003 the Council adopted Joint Action 2003/873/CFSP (1) amending and extending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union for the Middle East peace process. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 8 December 2003 the Council adopted Joint Action 2003/873/CFSP (1) amending and extending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union for the Middle East peace process.

| (2) | On 2 February 2005 the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/99/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union until 31 August 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 2 February 2005 the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/99/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union until 31 August 2005.

| (3) | On the basis of a review of Joint Action 2003/873/CFSP the mandate of the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) should be extended for a further six months. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of a review of Joint Action 2003/873/CFSP the mandate of the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) should be extended for a further six months.

| (4) | The EUSR will implement his mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy as set out in Article 11 of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The EUSR will implement his mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy as set out in Article 11 of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

The mandate of Mr Marc OTTE as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Middle East peace process as set out in Joint Action 2003/873/CFSP is hereby extended until 28 February 2006.

Article 2

Article 5(1) of Joint Action 2003/873/CFSP shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR shall be EUR 560 000.’

Article 3

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Article 4

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 July 2005.

For the Council

The President

J. STRAW

---

(1)  
  OJ L 326, 13.12.2003, p. 46.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 31, 4.2.2005, p. 73.

2

---
Moffett B. Roller

mroller@rollerbauer.com

Law Offices

ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC

Washington Dulles International Airport

45005 Aviation Drive; Suite 200

Dulles, VA 20166

Phone: 202-331-3300 • Fax: 202-331-3322

Lee A. Bauer

lbauer@rollerbauer.com

March 19, 2015

Mr. Robert Finamore

Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Polling Report

Application of ABC Aerolíneas, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Interjet,

for Exemption (Houston - Mexico City); Docket DOT-OST-2015-0056

Dear Mr. Finamore:

We have served copies of the Application of ABC Aerolíneas, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a

Interjet, for an Exemption for authority to operate between Houston, Texas, Mexico City, Mexico

on the U.S. carriers listed on the attached Service List, and we have polled each of those carriers

with respect to its position on the Application.

None of the U.S. carriers on the attached Service List has any objection to DOT approval

of the Application. Interjet therefore renews its request that the Department issue the exemption

on an expedited basis so that Interjet can introduce its service on this new route as promptly as

possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Roller & Bauer, PLLC

Attorneys for

ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Interjet

By: ____________________________________

Moffett B. Roller

cc: Service List
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 19th day of March, 2015, I served a copy of the

foregoing Polling Report by email upon the parties listed below.

________________

Moffett B. Roller

Howard Kass

Robert A. Wirick American Airlines howard.kass@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

Daniel A. Weiss United Air Lines dan.weiss@united.com

Gerald F. Murphy

Steven J. Seiden SkyWest gmurphy@crowell.com

sseiden@crowell.com

Sascha Van der Bellen Delta Air Lines sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

Robert Kneisley

Leslie Abbott Southwest Airways bob.kneisley@wnco.com

leslie.abbott@wnco.com

Stephen Cristina US State Department cristinasa@state.gov

John Duncan FAA Flight Standards john.s.duncan@faa.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JULIO ELIEZER ORTIZ, SR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 615 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### EASTERN ELEVATOR, INC., Petitioner, v. Esther C. PAGE et al., Respondents. ANTIOCH COLLEGE, an Ohio Educational Institution, and Sunrise Shopping Center, Inc., Petitioners, v. Esther PAGE et al., Respondents.

Nos. 70-930, 70-937.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 18, 1971.

Thomas B. Mimms, Jr., and W. M. O’Bryan of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner, Eastern *327Elevator, Inc., and respondent, Liberty Equity.

Sherouse & Virgin, Miami, for petitioners, Antioch College and Sunrise Shopping Center.

Bayard B. Sellars of Law Offices of Fritz Herman, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent, Esther C. Page.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court entered its order denying motions which sought dismissal for lack of prosecution. Defendants timely filed two separate petitions for writ of certiorari seeking review of such order. These separate petitions have been consolidated for briefing, oral argument and disposition.

An order denying dismissal for lack of prosecution is an interlocutory order which may be reviewed by interlocutory appeal. Rule 4.2, F.A.R. 32 F.S.A. The rule does not preclude a party from applying to the court for the discretionary writ of certiorari to review such interlocutory order. In the instant case, the procedural route adopted by the petitioners has caused them no harm since our decision is rendered upon the merits of the question presented.

The record discloses that within a one-year period immediately prior to the filing of the motions to dismiss one of the defendants filed written interrogatories to be answered by the plaintiff. Although the plaintiff did not file or serve an answer to such interrogatories, we hold that the defendant’s filing of the written interrogatories constitutes sufficient affirmative showing of prosecution of the action to justify denial of a motion to dismiss filed under Rule 1.420(e) R.C.P., 30 F.S.A. Cf. Fund Insurance Companies v. Preskitt, Fla.App.1970, 231 So.2d 866; Cypress Corporation of Florida v. Smith, Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 481; Rosenfeld v. Glickstein, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 242; Owens v. Ken’s Paint and Body Shop, Fla.App.1967, 196 So.2d 17; and, Musselman Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Radziwon et al., Fourth District Court of Appeal, 250 So.2d 327.

Certiorari denied.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

FL-15 Quietwater Beach Ferry Dock Ferry Infrastructure 

Improvements

National Park Service - 

Gulf Islands National 

Seashore

Escambia County Escambia 2017-

2018

FL-16 Timucuan Trail Study Bicycle/Pedestrian 

Feasibility Study

National Park Service - 

Timucuan Ecological & 

Historical Preserve

City of 

Jacksonville Duval 2017-2018

FL-17 Smith Creek Road Roadway resurfacing & 

Addition of Bicycle Lanes

Forest Service - 

Appalachicola National 

Forest

Leon County Leon 2018

FL-18

Coast to coast Trailhead at 

Parrish Park 

Enhancement & 

Rehabilitation of 

Trailhead Amenities

Fish and Wildlife Service - 

Merritt Island National 

Wildlife Refuge

Brevard County Brevard 2019-

2020

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Florida Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Florida FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Florida Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2017-2020

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The Florida PDC does not have a firm date for the next 

Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please bookmark our website to watch for future calls in your state. 

https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/flap/ 

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30937

Summary Calendar

KERMIT ISOM,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD P. IEYOUB, Attorney General;

EDGAR C. DAY, Warden,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-1067)

April 29, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kermit Isom appeals the trial court’s rejection of his petition for habeas

relief. The district court granted a certificate of appealability on the sole issue

presented in this case, i.e., whether Article 916 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal

Procedure violates the ex post facto clause of the Constitution. We conclude that
2

it does not and on the facts as found, authorities cited, and analysis made in the

Report and Recommendation by the magistrate judge, signed and filed on July 30,

1996, which was approved and adopted as its own opinion by the district court

through its Order and Judgmentsigned August 20, 1996 and filed August 21, 1996,

we AFFIRM.
#### Alton H. PETTINGILL, Jr., and Fay E. Pettingill, his wife, Relators, v. Fred C. AUGAT, Anna L. Geen and the Honorable Volie A. Williams, Jr., Respondents.

No. 69-664.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 20, 1969.

Prohibition denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3544 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3544

To designate the visitor and education center at Fort McHenry National 
  Monument and Historic Shrine as the ``Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and 
                          Education Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2023

 Mr. Cardin (for himself and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the visitor and education center at Fort McHenry National 
  Monument and Historic Shrine as the ``Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and 
                          Education Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PAUL S. SARBANES VISITOR AND EDUCATION 
              CENTER.

    (a) Designation.--The visitor and education center at Fort McHenry 
National Monument and Historic Shrine located at 2400 East Fort Ave, 
Baltimore, Maryland, is designated as the ``Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor 
and Education Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other document of the United States to the visitor center 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and Education Center''.
                                 <all>
```
(A) Eastern Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle

USDepariment Highway Division Sterling, VA 20166-6511
of Transportation

Federal Highway
Administration

MAY -9 2013 In Reply Refer to: HFPP-15

Mr. Robert J. St. Onge, Jr.

Secretary

South Carolina Department of Transportation
955 Park Street

Columbia, SC 29201

Subject: MAP-21 Access Program Programming Decisions Committee Members
Dear Mr. St. Onge:

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141,
includes the establishment of the new Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP). This new
program will be administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Federal
Lands Highway. South Carolina is served by the Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division
(EFLHD) office in Sterling, Virginia.

A key requirement for implementing the FLAP is to coordinate the establishment of a three
member Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for programming the FLAP
funds allocated to each state. Each state level PDC consists of a representative from the Federal
Lands Highway Division office, the State Department of Transportation, and an organization or
entity that is suited to represent the local entities responsible for building, operating, or
maintaining transportation facilities that are located on, are adjacent to, or provide access to
Federal lands. Our program managers have coordinated with your department and have
identified the following positions that will fulfill the PDC requirement:

FLAP Program Manager, FHWA, EFLHD
Statewide Planning Chief, South Carolina Department of Transportation
Executive Director, Appalachian Council of Governments


Additional information on the implementation of FLAP can be found on the EFLHD MAP-21
website at http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/federal-lands-access.aspx. If you have any
questions, please contact Mr. David Payne at 571-434-1543 or David.Payne@dot.gov, or myself
at 703-404-6276 or Karen.Schmidt@dot.gov.

Sincerely yours,

KA A

CpKaren A. Schmidt
Director, Office of Program Administration

ce:

Mr. Steven Pelissier, Executive Director, Appalachian Council of Governments, Greenville, SC

Mr. Mark Pleasant, Statewide Planning Chief, South Carolina Department of Transportation,
Columbia, SC

Mr. Robert Lee, Division Administrator, FHWA, South Carolina Division Office, Columbia, SC

Mr. Stephan Ikerd, Operations Engineer, FHWA, South Carolina Division Office, Columbia, SC