alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo20820 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONI, Scott Thornock, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nicklebys.com, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

> 
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;				(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and				(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

> 
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and				(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

			Date: November 11, 2005  /s/ Scott Thornock                                           Scott Thornock			Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer

----
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.11(c)  


 
 

AMENDMENT TO
  AMENDED AND RESTATED 1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN
  OF CENDANT CORPORATION
  
    Amended as of March 19, 2002    
  


        The Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan of Cendant Corporation (the "Plan") is hereby amended as follows: 


	1.
	The
first sentence of Section 2 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated to read, in its entirety, as follows: 




Options
may be granted under the Plan to purchase in the aggregate not more than 79,970,794 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, of the Company, of the series designated CD Stock ("Common
Stock"), which shares may, in the discretion of the Board of Directors, consist either in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock or shares of Common Stock held in the
treasury of the Company. 




	2.
	Ratification. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed without modification.



	3.
	Effective Date. This Amendment shall be effective as of March 19, 2002. 









QuickLinks


AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED 1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN OF CENDANT CORPORATION Amended as of March 19, 2002
# EUR-Lex - 32005M3908 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005M3908

**Commission Decision of 31/08/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3908 - ABN AMRO / IMCD) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

Brussels, 31.08.2005

SG-Greffe(2005) D/204716

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.3908 – ABN AMRO/IMCD

Notification of 26.07.2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 189 of 03.08.2005, page 5.

1. On 26.07.2005, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which the undertaking ABN AMRO Capital BO Funds B.V (“ABN AMRO”, The Netherlands) belonging to the ABN AMRO group acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking IMCD Group B.V. (“IMCD”, The Netherlands) by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for ABN AMRO : provision of financial services;

- for IMCD : distribution of specialty chemicals.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph c, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

(signed)

Neelie KROES

Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

ERNEST0 SANTIAGO, 

Plaintiff, i 

v. 

1 

1 Civil Action No. 04-335 Erie 

UIVZTED STATES OF AMERICA, 

1 

1 

Defendant. 

1 

1 

I ORDER 

1 AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2005, and upon consideration of the Plaintiff, 

1 Ernesto Santiago's Appeal of Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter7s oral Report and 

Recommendation entered on the record on November 16,2005 [Doc. No. 401 recommending that 

hs Motion for Immediate Transfer [Doc. No. 361 be denied, and that his Motion for 

Reconsideration [Doc. No. 291 be denied, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appeal [Doc. IVo. 421 is DENIED, and the oral 

Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. 

sl Sean J. McLaunhlin 

United States District Judge 

cc: All parties of record 

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:04-cv-00335-SJM Document 46 Filed 12/22/05 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                          371,380
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                1,919,504
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                          252,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      2,565
<PP&E>                          304,848
<DEPRECIATION>                 249,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               3,816,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              561,248
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                          3,271
<OTHER-SE>                           995,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3,816,754
<SALES>                       1,469,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,493,796
<CGS>                                   5,546
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    7,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    672,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     813,529
<INCOME-TAX>                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           813,529
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                   813,529
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.249)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.171)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27467]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Scientific Computing; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Scientific Computing 
(#1185).
    Date and Time: November 7, 1997, 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 
1150, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. John Van Rosendale, Program Director, New 
Technologies Program, Suite 1122, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-1962.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide recommendations and advice 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: Panel review of the New Technologies Program proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 10, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-27467 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.3



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, David K. Grant, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 28, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ David K. Grant                   
|David K. Grant                       
|President and Chief Operating Officer
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.35    
  


2003 SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN  


Background  


        At its meeting on December 18, 2002, the Nominating and Compensation Committee reviewed and approved the 2003 Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP)
for officers of PG&E Corporation and each subsidiary. The structure (Attachment A) establishes the weighting of corporate earnings from operations, subsidiary earnings from operations, and
other performance factors for officers. 






2003 Recommended Officer Short-Term Incentive Plan Structure  



	Officer Group
	 	Award Component
	 	Weight
	 	Performance Measures

	PG&E Corporation	 	Corporate Financial Performance	 	25%	 	Corporate earnings from operations
	

 	
 	

Corporate Liquidity	
 	

25%	
 	

Sufficient Corporate cash reserves
	

 	
 	

Utility Plan of Reorganization	
 	

25%	
 	

Progress towards the reorganization of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
	

 	
 	

NEG Restructuring	
 	

25%	
 	

Progress towards the restructuring of PG&E National Energy Group
	

President and CEO

— Pacific Gas and Electric Company	
 	

Corporate Financial Performance	
 	

25%	
 	

Corporate earnings from operations
	

 	
 	

Subsidiary Financial Performance	
 	

25%	
 	

Respective subsidiary contribution to corporate earnings from operations
	

 	
 	

Utility Plan of Reorganization	
 	

50%	
 	

Progress towards the reorganization of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
	

President

— PG&E National

Energy Group	
 	

Corporate Financial Performance	
 	

25%	
 	

Corporate earnings from operations
	

 	
 	

Subsidiary Financial Performance	
 	

25%	
 	

Respective subsidiary contribution to corporate earnings from operations
	

 	
 	

NEG Restructuring	
 	

50%	
 	

Progress towards the restructuring of PG&E National Energy Group
	

Pacific Gas and Electric Company	
 	

Corporate Financial Performance	
 	

25%	
 	

Corporate earnings from operations
	

 	
 	

Utility Plan of Reorganization	
 	

25%	
 	

Progress towards the reorganization of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
	

 	
 	

Subsidiary Financial Performance	
 	

25%	
 	

Respective subsidiary contribution to corporate earnings from operations
	

 	
 	

Subsidiary Operational Performance	
 	

25%	
 	

Financial, operating, and service measures determined by subsidiary CEO
	
 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 







	

PG&E National

Energy Group	
 	

Corporate Financial Performance	
 	

25%	
 	

Corporate earnings from operations
	

 	
 	

NEG Restructuring	
 	

25%	
 	

Progress towards the restructuring of PG&E National Energy Group
	

 	
 	

Subsidiary Financial Performance	
 	

25%	
 	

Respective subsidiary contribution to corporate earnings from operations
	

 	
 	

Subsidiary Operational Performance	
 	

25%	
 	

Financial, operating, and service measures determined by subsidiary CEO











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.35
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report of PETROLEOS DEVENEZUELA, S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,2003, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Antonio Simancas Cardozo, Chief Financial Officer,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)                                     theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: October 7, 2005        |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
|                         |
| /s/ Antonio Simancas Cardozo |   |
| Antonio Simancas Cardozo     |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer     |   |
|                              |  |  |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 366 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 366

  To direct the Administrator of General Services to ensure that the 
design of public buildings in the United States adheres to the guiding 
      principles for Federal architecture, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2023

  Mr. Van Hollen (for himself and Mr. Lujan) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Administrator of General Services to ensure that the 
design of public buildings in the United States adheres to the guiding 
      principles for Federal architecture, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Democracy in Design Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUING INVESTIGATION AND SURVEY OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3303 of title 40, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), by inserting ``(referred to in this section as the 
        `Administrator')'' after ``Services''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Guiding Principles for Federal Architecture.--The 
Administrator shall ensure that the design of public buildings in the 
United States adheres to the principles described in the report 
published by the Ad Hoc Committee on Federal Office Space entitled 
`Guiding Principles for Federal Architecture' and dated June 1, 
1962.''.
    (b) Rulemaking.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Administrator of General Services 
        shall promulgate such regulations as are necessary--
                    (A) to implement the amendment made by subsection 
                (a)(2); and
                    (B) to establish minimum standards by which the 
                Administrator of General Services shall design public 
                buildings in the United States.
            (2) Notice and comment.--The regulations required under 
        paragraph (1) shall be issued after notice and an opportunity 
        for public comment in accordance with the procedure applicable 
        to substantive rules under section 553 of title 5, United 
        States Code.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 98-4182 KOFFI KITCHENS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-134) Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: September 23, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Kevin D. Mills, LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN D. MILLS, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. William D. Wilmoth, United StatesAttorney, Paul T. Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: Koffi Kitchens appeals from his sentence imposed after pleading guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to distributing crack cocaine within 1000 feet of an elementary school, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 841(a), 860 (1994). We dismiss Kitchens' appeal.In the plea agreement, Kitchens waived his right to appeal any sentence imposed within the statutory maximum of forty years. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(C), 860. The court specifically discussed the waiver provision with Kitchens at the plea hearing, and asked him if he understood that by pleading guilty he was giving up his right to appeal any sentence imposed within the statutory maximum of forty years. Kitchens indicated that he understood the waiver provision.The court sentenced Kitchens to 121 months' imprisonment, to be followed by five years of supervised release.On appeal, Kitchens raises several contentions regarding the district court's computation of his sentence. The Government in its replybrief does not rely on Kitchens' waiver of his right to appeal his sentence, but rather argues the merits of Kitchens' sentencing error claims. Our review of the record reveals full compliance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. Accordingly, by agreeing to waive his appeal rights, Kitchens knowingly and voluntarily relinquished his right to appeal his sentence. See United States v. Attar , 38 F.3d 727, 731 (4th Cir. 1994); United States v. Wiggins , 905 F.2d 51, 53 (4th Cir. 1990). Although the Government did not rely on Kitchens' waiver of appeal rights, this court is not precluded from dismissing Kitchens' appeal on this basis. See United States v. Schmidt , 47 F.3d 188, 190-92 (7th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we dismiss Kitchens' appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately set forth in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 06-7895 

JANET LIVINGSTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (1:05-cv-00015)

Submitted: May 31, 2007 Decided: June 5, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janet Livingston, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Janet Livingston, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Livingston v. Hickey, No. 1:05-cv-00015 (S.D.W.

Va. Oct. 18, 2006). We deny Livingston’s motion for bail pending

appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED