alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| NAME               |   | PARENT             |   | STATE OR COUNTRY OFINCORPORATION |
|--------------------|--------|--------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|               |   |               |   |                                            |
| Dyax Holdings B.V. |   | Dyax Corp.         |   | Netherlands                                     |
|               |   |               |   |                                            |
| Dyax B.V.          |   | Dyax Holdings B.V. |   | Netherlands                                     |
|               |   |               |   |                                            |
| Dyax S.A.          |   | Dyax Corp.         |   | Belgium                                         |

----
#### Robert Lee WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-24.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 14, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### Sterling Curtis BOWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-171.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 20, 1973.

J. Russell Hornsby, Orlando, for appellant.

. Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Enoch J. Whitney, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., JOHNSON, J., and MELVIN, Associate Judge, concur.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

Number Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Unit Accessed Applicant County

MS-01 Sardis Lake Drive Improvements Reconstruction

U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers- Sardis Lake 

Field Office

Panola County Panola

MS-06 Replacement of Bridge over Little 

Thompson Creek Bridge Replacement U.S. Forest Service - Desoto National Forest Wayne County Wayne

MS-08 Middleton Creek Road Bridge 

Replacement Bridge Replacement

U.S. Forest Service - 

Homochitto National 

Forest

Franklin County Franklin

MS-09 Providence Road Bridge Replacement Bridge Replacement

U.S. Forest Service - 

Homochitto National 

Forest

Franklin County Franklin

MS-10 Providence Road Bridge Replacement Bridge Replacement U.S. Forest Service - 

Desoto National Forest Stone County Stone

MS-11 Roadway and Bridge Improvements on 

County Road 832

Road and Bridge 

Reconstruction

U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers - Nanih 

Waiya Wildlife 

Management Area

Neshoba County Neshoba

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Mississippi Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its initial, multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Mississippi FLAP are listed below in no particular order, and include:

Mississippi Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2013-2014
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

Number Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Unit Accessed Applicant County

MS-12 Crooked Creek Road Bridge Replacement 

(79-091 & 79-093) Bridge Replacement

U.S. Forest Service - 

Homochitto National 

Forest

Wilkinson County Wilkinson

MS-13 Middleton Creek Road Bridge #32 

Replacement Bridge Replacement

U.S. Forest Service - 

Homochitto National 

Forest

Franklin County Franklin

MS-14 East McHenry Road & Bridge 

Improvements

Road and Bridge 

Reconstruction

U.S. Forest Service - 

Desoto National Forest Stone County Stone

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these agreements. Funding for these projects is not guaranteed. Funding beyond FY 

2014 is dependent on reauthorization of the Access Program by Congress. The Mississippi PDC does not have a firm date for the next call for projects 

under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. If you have any questions please contact David Payne, Access Program 

Manager, at 571-434-1543 or email at David.Payne@dot.gov.

Mississippi Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2013-2014
#### WARRINER v. FERNANDEZ.

No. 37912.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Rehearing Denied May 2, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 213 So.2d 328.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roger Dale DOUCET.

No. 60287.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 6, 1977.

In re: Dennis R. Sumpter applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ granted. The granting of this writ shall not interfere with the trial of the case, and a stay order is denied. The appointment is continued. This case shall be placed on the October docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SILKNET
SOFTWARE INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001079451
<NAME> SILKNET SOFTWARE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          51,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,371
<PP&E>                                           4,933
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,440
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,002
<SALES>                                          4,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,029
<CGS>                                               70
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   325
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,887)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,887)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 2009 - Present AL eCrash Data Element Manual 2012

2 Incapacitating A

Incapacitating: This means that the victim must be carried or otherwise helped from the 

scene. If the victim needs no help, then either a code 3 or 4 applies even though medical 

assistance may have been administered at the scene.

7.5 Victim Injury Type codes & definitions found on pg 96 

(PDF 97) [2009], pg128 [2012]

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 2012-Present AL Data Element Manual 2012,

AL Uniform Traffic Crash Report 2008

Pedestrian 51

Pedestrian – Non-motorists are only classified as pedestrians if they do not meet the other 

qualifications given below (i.e., they are not skaters, scooter riders, pedalcyclists or riding 

animals). 

3.2.2 Unit Type code found on Manual pg68,

definition found on Manual pg70

Other pedestrian (e.g., 

wheelchair) 52 No definition found. 3.2.2 Unit Type code found on Manual pg68

Skater 53 No definition found. 3.2.2 Unit Type code found on Manual pg68

Scooter 54 No definition found. 3.2.2 Unit Type code found on Manual pg68

Pedalcyclist 2012-Present

Bicyclist 55 No definition found. 3.2.2 Unit Type code found on Manual pg68

Other Cyclist (tricycle, etc.) 56 No definition found. 3.2.2 Unit Type code found on Manual pg68

Alabama
David W. Karp, President & CEO

11/11/2014

Northern Air Cargo, Inc.

4510 Old International Airport Road, Anchorage, AK 99502
# L_2005280EN.01000501.xml

| 25.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 280/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 280/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1743/2005

of 24 October 2005

amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 1166/2005 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of maize held by the French intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1166/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of maize held by the French intervention agency. That invitation to tender expires on 26 October 2005, while the quantities made available under the Regulation have not been entirely used up. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1166/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of maize held by the French intervention agency. That invitation to tender expires on 26 October 2005, while the quantities made available under the Regulation have not been entirely used up.

| (2) | In order to guarantee livestock farmers and the livestock-feed industry supplies at competitive prices throughout the 2005/06 marketing year, the stocks of maize held by the French intervention agency should continue to be made available on the cereal market. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In order to guarantee livestock farmers and the livestock-feed industry supplies at competitive prices throughout the 2005/06 marketing year, the stocks of maize held by the French intervention agency should continue to be made available on the cereal market.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 1166/2005 should be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 1166/2005 should be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the third subparagraph of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1166/2005, the date ‘26 October 2005’ is replaced by ‘28 June 2006’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 188, 20.7.2005, p. 10. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1495/2005 (OJ L 240, 16.9.2005, p. 36).

2

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 17, 2018

NO. 03-18-00329-CV

V. N. G., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES FIELD AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the order terminating parental rights signed by the trial court on April 17, 

2018. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s termination order.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
SERVED: September 29, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

Christopher McCann 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0405 

(Civil Penalty Action). 

ORDER ON SHOW CAUSE 

And 

. i ' 

ORDER ON COMPLAINT'S MOTION TO DISMISS RESPONDENT'S 

REQUEST FOR HEARING 

AND 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO DEEM ALLEGATIONS ADMITTED. 

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Agency") filed a Motion for 

Judgment on the Pleadings dated August 11, 2014. We issued a Show Cause Order on 

August 26, 2014. 

Christopher McCann (hereinafter "Respondent") filed an Objection to 

Complainant's Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted or End Motion 

to Limit Issues at Hearing to Sanctions dated September 11, 2014. Respondent also filed 

a copy of his Request for Hearing dated June 15, 2014. 

We will treat Respondent's submissions as responses to our Order to Show Cause. 

WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

1. Our Order to Show Cause be and is hereby vacated; and 

2. Respondent's submissions be and are hereby received; and 

3. FAA's Motions to Dismiss Request for Hearing and Motion to Deem Allegations 

admitted be and are hereby DENIED; and 

4. This matter will be set for hearing. We do not anticipate hearing this case until 

early 2015. 

·::.•;,1...... ' i 

. '• /1 

,,;'(,,(4,. '! 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Christopher McCann, Respondent 

109 4111 Avenue North 

Sartell, MN 563 77 

Briana Martino, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Regional Counsel (AGL-7) 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7313 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue; S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0405 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7267

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PAUL J. GIBSON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-52-NN, CA-96-13-4)

Submitted: May 30, 1997 Decided: June 16, 1997

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul J. Gibson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Gibson, Nos. CR-92-52-NN, CA-96-13-4 (E.D.

Va. Aug. 1, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for release pending

review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
254 La. 830

#### A. Ray TOLAR, d/b/a Tolar Plumbing & Heating v. K & G CONTRACTORS, a Partnership composed of Harry Katz and Abraham Goldfarb and the said Harry Katz and Abraham Goldfarb.

No. 50067.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 6, 1969.

In re: K & G Contractors, composed of Harry Katz and Abraham Goldfarb applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 214 So.2d 176; 224 So.2d 202.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28031]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC 
20549.
Extension:
    Rule 30d-1, SEC File No. 270-21, OMB Control No. 3235-0025

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a 
request for extension of the previously approved collection of 
information discussed below.
    Rule 30d-1, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, ``Reports to 
Stockholders of Management Companies'' prescribes the minimum content 
of reports to shareholders that every registered investment company 
must send at least semi-annually, containing the information specified 
by the statute or its equivalent as the Commission may determine to be 
in the interest of the investors. The reports are required in order to 
inform current shareholders of the status of the company. The rule 
requires approximately 602 hours annually for each of the 3,850 
respondents equalling 2,317,700 total annual burden hours.
    Rule 30d-1 does not involve any recordkeeping requirements. 
Providing the information required by rule 30d-1 is mandatory and the 
information provided will not be kept confidential.
    The Commission may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid control number.
    General comments regarding the above information should be directed 
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 3208, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, D.C. 20503; and (ii) Michael E. Bartell, 
Associate Executive Director, Office of Information Technology, 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20549. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this 
notice.

    Dated: October 14, 1997.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28031 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
# L_2005249EN.01002001.xml

| 24.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 249/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 249/20

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1519/2005 of 19 September 2005 opening the procedure for the allocation of export licences for cheese to be exported to the United States of America in 2006 under certain GATT quotas

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 244 of 20 September 2005
  )

On page 15, Annex I, title:

for:

‘(Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 and Regulation (EC) No 1513/2005)’,

read:

‘(Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 and Regulation (EC) No 1519/2005)’.

On page 16, Annex II, first and second lines:

for:

‘Identification of group and quota referred to in column 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1513/2005:

Name of group indicated in column 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1513/2005 ...’,

read:

‘Identification of group and quota referred to in column 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1519/2005:

Name of group indicated in column 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1519/2005: ...’.

On page 17, Annex III, first and second lines:

for:

‘Identification of group and quota referred to in column 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1513/2005:

Name of group indicated in column 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1513/2005 ...’,

read:

‘Identification of group and quota referred to in column 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1519/2005:

Name of group indicated in column 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1519/2005: ...’.

On page 18, Annex IV, in the heading of the first column:

for:

‘Identification of group and quota referred to in column 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1513/2005’,

read:

‘Identification of group and quota referred to in column 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1519/2005’.

---