alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DWS INVESTMENTS VIT FUNDS

SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES OF THE PORTFOLIO LISTED
                                     BELOW:

                                -----------------

                      DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities VIP

Upon the recommendation of the advisor, the Board of DWS Investments VIT Funds
(the "Fund"), has approved the termination and liquidation of DWS RREEF Real
Estate Securities VIP (the "Portfolio") effective on or about April 25, 2008
(the "Liquidation Date"). Accordingly, the Portfolio will redeem involuntarily
the shares of any shareholder (i.e., the participating insurance companies that
offer the Portfolio) outstanding on the Liquidation Date. Shareholders whose
shares are redeemed involuntarily by the Portfolio on the Liquidation Date will
receive the net asset value per share for all shares they own on the Liquidation
Date.

In conjunction with approving the termination and liquidation of the Portfolio,
the Board of the Fund further approved closing the Portfolio to new insurance
company relationships effective as of the close of business on January 25, 2008.
Existing insurance company investors that currently offer the Portfolio as an
investment option may continue to offer it to their contract holders until the
Liquidation Date.














               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference










                                                                     [Logo]DWS
                                                                       SCUDDER
January 18, 2008                                           Deutsche Bank Group
# L_2005055EN.01001001.xml

| 1.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 55/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 55/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 347/2005

of 28 February 2005

fixing the production refund for olive oil used in the manufacture of certain preserved foods

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 136/66/EEC of 22 September 1966 on the establishment of a common organisation of the market in oils and fats (1), and in particular Article 20a thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 20a of Regulation No 136/66/EEC provides for the granting of a production refund for olive oil used in the preserving industry. Pursuant to paragraph 6 of that Article, and without prejudice to paragraph 3 thereof, the Commission shall fix this refund every two months. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 20a of Regulation No 136/66/EEC provides for the granting of a production refund for olive oil used in the preserving industry. Pursuant to paragraph 6 of that Article, and without prejudice to paragraph 3 thereof, the Commission shall fix this refund every two months.

| (2) | By virtue of Article 20a(2) of the abovementioned Regulation, the production refund must be fixed on the basis of the gap between prices on the world market and on the Community market, taking account of the import charge applicable to olive oil falling within CN subheading 1509 90 00 and the factors used for fixing the export refunds for those olive oils during the reference period. It is appropriate to take as a reference period the two-month period preceding the beginning of the term of validity of the production refund. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

By virtue of Article 20a(2) of the abovementioned Regulation, the production refund must be fixed on the basis of the gap between prices on the world market and on the Community market, taking account of the import charge applicable to olive oil falling within CN subheading 1509 90 00 and the factors used for fixing the export refunds for those olive oils during the reference period. It is appropriate to take as a reference period the two-month period preceding the beginning of the term of validity of the production refund.

| (3) | The application of the above criteria results in the refund being fixed as shown below, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The application of the above criteria results in the refund being fixed as shown below,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the months of March and April 2005, the amount of the production refund referred to in Article 20a(2) of Regulation No 136/66/EEC shall be 44,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 February 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ 172, 30.9.1966, p. 3025/66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 865/2004 (OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 97).

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended July 3, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                                
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 11, 2009 |  | /s/ ROBERT J. HALLIDAY                                         
|                       |  | Robert J. Halliday                                             
|                       |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
I N THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
N OT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

HA RRY JAMES ROBINSON, JR. , A ppellant ,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 2023 LT Case No. 2014

- CF

- 1376
STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed January 10, 2023
3.853 Appeal f rom t he Circuit C ourt for Putnam County , Howard O. McGillin, Jr., Judge. Harry J ames Robinson, J r., Daytona B each , pro s e. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Lambrix v

. State , 21 7 So. 3 d 97 7 , 9 87 (Fla. 2 017) (“ [A] trial court does not err i n denying a mot ion f or D NA t esting w here the
defendant c annot show t hat t here i s a reasonable probability t hat t he absence2

or pr esence of DNA

at a crim e scene would exonerate him o r l essen his
sentenc e.” ).

LAMBERT , C.J. , EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., co ncur.
No. 00-858.

#### Barefoot, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Barefoot, Deceased *v.*Thermo Industries, Inc., et al.

Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.
#### Walter L. COOK v. Cecil P. CAMPBELL II.

No. 62762.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 1, 1978.

In re: Walter L. Cook applying for writ of review and certiorari. Parish of Bossier. 360 So.2d 1193.

Writ denied. We find no error of law in the reasons stated by the Court of Appeal.

DENNIS, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted to review and afford full hearing on the serious questions of constitutional and statutory law raised by this and other election disputes pending throughout the state.
#### Cecil ROSE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-697.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 5, 1970.

Rehearing Denied June 10, 1970.

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Robert E. Metzker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL, and SWANN, JJ-

PEARSON, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying without evidentiary hearing appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Rule 1.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33

*354F.S.A. The trial judge set out the ground for the denial as follows:

> “That Movant is not presently incarcerated by virtue of the Sentence heretofore imposed upon him in this cause on January 6, 1948, said sentence having been heretofore completely satisfied.”

The conclusion of the trial judge is supported by decisions in this jurisdiction prior to the date of his order. Nevertheless we think that the ground is not sufficient under the later decisions. See Lawson v. State, Fla.1970, 231 So.2d 205; State v. Reynolds, Supreme Court, case no. 38,848, filed March 11, 1970. And cf. Cappetta v. Wainwright, 406 F.2d 1238 (5th Cir.1969). The foregoing authorities lead us to conclude that a prisoner is “in custody” for the purpose of applying for post-conviction relief from a judgment, the sentence for which has been satisfied, if the motion shows some relationship between the current confinement and the judgment to which the motion for relief is addressed such as would result in the prisoner’s receiving credit in some degree on the current confinement. The relationship claimed in this motion is by no means clear. However, prisoners seeking relief under Rule 1.850 are not held to exactitude in pleading. Hall v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 527. In the instant case the state has conceded in argument that from the allegations of the motion there may be a relationship between the current confinement and the judgment to which the motion is addressed. We therefore hold that the reason assigned by the trial judge for the summary denial of the motion is insufficient.

The ground for relief relied upon by appellant in his motion is an allegation that he was not afforded counsel at the time of his conviction in 1948. The state points out that the motion is fatally defective in that it does not allege that appellant was insolvent and unable to procure counsel in 1948. Such an allegation has been held essential even under the relaxed requirements for a motion for relief pursuant to Rule 1.850. Savage v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 566; Leeds v. State, Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 77. Therefore the order denying relief under the rule cannot be held to have been erroneous.

Inasmuch as our affirmance of the denial of appellant’s motion is based on the above-mentioned deficiency in the allegations of the motion, the affirmance will not prejudice a subsequent motion upon the same ground if appellant is able truthfully to allege that he was insolvent and unable to procure counsel in 1948. See Leeds v. State, above.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.3



                                                 [Troy-Ikoda Limited letterhead]





                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


We hereby consent to the use of the name Troy-Ikoda Limited and of references to
Troy-Ikoda  Limited and to the  inclusion of and  references  to our report,  or
information contained therein,  dated 12th March 2002, prepared for FX Energy in
the FX Energy  Corporation  annual  report on Form 10-K for the year  ended 31st
December  2001,  and the  incorporation  by reference to the report  prepared by
Troy-Ikoda  Limited into FX Energy  Corporation's  previously filed Registration
Statements on Form S-1 (No. 333-40480) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-80489).

Troy-Ikoda Limited

/s/ Francis Boundy
Francis Boundy
Director


27th March 2002
```

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.33

                                                                  EXECUTION COPY

                                  ASSIGNMENT OF
                 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS

                                       TO

                              EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.

            The  undersigned,  pursuant to that  certain  Amended  and  Restated
Securities  Contribution Agreement dated as of December 12, 2003, by and between
Empire Resorts,  Inc., Alpha  Monticello,  Inc.,  Catskill  Development,  L.L.C,
Americas Tower Partners ("ATP"),  Monticello Realty L.L.C.,  Watertone Holdings,
LP, New York Gaming,  LLC,  Fox-Hollow  Lane, LLC,  Shamrock  Strategies,  Inc.,
Clifford A. Ehrlich,  BKB,  LLC,  Robert A. Berman,  Philip B. Berman,  Scott A.
Kaniewski,  Kaniewski Family Limited  Partnership and KFP Trust (the "SECURITIES
CONTRIBUTION  AGREEMENT"),  and the  unanimous  written  consent of the  general
partners of ATP,  effective  as of the  Closing  (as  defined in the  Securities
Contribution Agreement),  hereby (i) assigns,  transfers and conveys all of the.
right,  title and interest in ATP's  membership  interest in Monticello  Raceway
Development  Company,  LLC ("MRD") to Empire Resorts,  Inc. and (ii) consents to
the admission of Empire Resorts, Inc. as a member of MRDD in accordance with the
terms of the Limited Liability Company Agreement for MRD, dated as of January 1,
1999.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

            IT WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this Assignment to
be effective as of January 12, 2004.

                                             AMERICAS TOWER PARTNERS

                                             By: /s/ Joseph E. Bernstein
                                                 ---------------------------
                                             Name:   Joseph E. Bernstein
                                             Title:  Managing Director

                 ASSIGNMENT BY ATP OF INTERESTS IN MRD TO EMPIRE

                                   SCHEDULE A

                 Limited Liability Company Membership Interests

ASSIGNEE                   ASSIGNED PERCENTAGE MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN MONTICELLO
                           RACEWAY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC

Americas Tower Partners                         50.00%
```
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Town and Country Trust (the "Trust")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer of the Trust does hereby certify that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Trust.

/s/ Harvey Schulweis
-------------------------------------------
Harvey Schulweis
Chief Executive Officer of
The Town and Country Trust

March 15, 2004
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 19, 2015.

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 15

- 00828

- CR

AVELL DAVIS, Appell ant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11

- 71526

- Q



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Lang

- Miers, and Whitehill

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s counsel has approved the

motion. Th e Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS th at th e appeal be DISMISSED and

this decision be certified below for observance. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47

150828F.U05

## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

AVELL DAVIS, Appellant

No. 05

- 15

- 00828

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11

- 71526

- Q.

Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices

Francis, Lang

- Miers, and Whitehill.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 19th day of August, 2015.
Exhibit
31.01





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14





I, David N. Pierce, certify
that:





1.           I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2, of FX Energy,
Inc.; and





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.





3.           [omitted]





4.           [omitted]





5.           [omitted]








Dated:
April 30, 2010








/s/ David
N. Pierce


David N.
Pierce


Chief
Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3474 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 599
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3474

To redesignate the Hulls Cove Visitor Center at Acadia National Park as 
            the ``George J. Mitchell, Jr., Visitor Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2023

 Mr. King (for himself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           November 21, 2024

 Reported by Mr. Manchin, with amendments and an amendment to the title
                    [Omit the parts struck through]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the Hulls Cove Visitor Center at Acadia National Park as 
            the ``George J. Mitchell, Jr., Visitor Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE HULLS COVE VISITOR CENTER AT ACADIA 
              NATIONAL PARK AS THE GEORGE J. MITCHELL, JR., VISITOR 
              CENTER.

    (a) Redesignation.--The Hulls Cove Visitor Center at Acadia 
National Park located in Bar Harbor, Maine, or any successor to that 
visitor center that is constructed after the date of enactment of this 
Act and serves as the primary visitor center for Acadia National Park, 
shall be known and designated as the ``George J. Mitchell, Jr., Visitor 
Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the visitor center 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``George J. Mitchell, Jr., Visitor Center''.
            Amend the title so as to read: ``A bill to redesignate the 
        Hulls Cove Visitor Center at Acadia National Park as the George 
        J. Mitchell Visitor Center.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 599

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3474

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To redesignate the Hulls Cove Visitor Center at Acadia National Park as 
            the ``George J. Mitchell, Jr., Visitor Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 21, 2024

         Reported with amendments and an amendment to the title
```
#### John Brinton SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 5, 1970.

Rehearing Denied September 23, 1970.

John L. Riley, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael N. Kavouklis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and PIERCE and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Please submit the attached Grant Letter to Docket No. FAA-2001-10356 that allows properly equipped USASOC aircraft to conduct low-level operations without complying with en route minimum altitudes for flights under instrument flight rules (IFR) or direction of flight requirements for IFR en route segments in uncontrollable airspace.
**Exhibit 31.2**








I, Andrew P. Kaplan, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Audible, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(3) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and





b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:





a) A ll significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





August 13, 2004
By:
/s/ Andrew P. KaplanName:
Andrew P. KaplanTitle:
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration (Principal Financial Officer)