alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2188]


Montana Power Company; Notice of Intent To Hold Public Meetings 
in Great Falls and Ennis, Montana, To Discuss the Draft Environmental 
Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Proposed Relicensing of the Missouri-
Madison Hydroelectric Project

October 15, 1997.
    On September 22, 1997, the Commission staff mailed the Missouri-
Madison Hydroelectric Project DEIS to the Environmental Protection 
Agency, resource and land management agencies, and interested 
organizations, and individuals. This document evaluates the 
environmental consequences of the proposed relicensing of the Missouri-
Madison Hydroelectric Project. The nine dams (Hebgen, Madison, Hauser, 
Holter, Black Eagle, Rainbow, Cochrane, Ryan, and Morony dams) that are 
a part of this project are located between West Yellowstone and above 
Great Falls, Montana, on over 300 river miles of the Madison and 
Missouri Rivers.
    The public meetings will be recorded by a court reporter and are 
scheduled as follows: (1) Tuesday, November 18, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. in 
the Missouri Room of the Great Falls Civic Center, Great Falls, Montana 
and (2) Thursday, November 20, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. in the Ennis High 
School Library, Ennis, Montana. These meetings will focus on the DEIS 
and issues of concern to resource and land management agencies, 
interested organizations, and individuals. Another meeting is scheduled 
on Wednesday, November 19, 1997, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. in the 
Director's Conference Room of the State of Montana's Lee Metcalf 
Building, 1520 East Sixth Avenue, Helena, Montana. This meeting will 
focus on clarification of issues of primary concern to state and 
federal fish and wildlife agencies.
    At the public meetings, Commission staff will summarize major DEIS 
findings and recommendations. Resource agency personnel and other 
interested persons will be provided an opportunity to submit oral and 
written comments about the DEIS for the Commission's public record. 
Written comments on the DEIS may also be sent to: The Secretary, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. Comments must be received by December 2, 1997. 
All correspondence should include the appropriate project name 
(Missouri-Madison Project) and number (Project No. 2188) on the first 
page of the correspondence.
    The DEIS considers recommendations received from the license 
applicant, citizens, resource agencies, and organizations. Resource 
enhancements affect flow regulation, recreation, land use, fish, 
wildlife, water quality, reservoir shoreline erosion, vegetation 
resources and other resource issues proposed.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27778 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.23.2    
  


 
 

AMENDMENT NO. 2    
  


        This Amendment No. 2, effective on the last date of signature, modifies and amends the Co-Promotion Agreement dated effective
November 26, 1997, as amended by the Amendment last executed on July 31, 2000 (together, the "AGREEMENT"), by and between Abbott Laboratories through its Ross Products Division
("ABBOTT"), and MedImmune, Inc. ("MEDIMMUNE"). 


 
 

WITNESSETH    
  


        WHEREAS, MEDIMMUNE and ABBOTT entered into a Co-Promotion Agreement dated effective November 26, 1997 in order to co-promote the
PRODUCT in the TERRITORY, and on July 31, 2000 entered into an Amendment effective for the 2000/2001 RSV season; 


        WHEREAS,
MEDIMMUNE and ABBOTT desire to further amend the AGREEMENT in order to provide special consideration for Synagis sales; 



        NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows: 



	1.
	Unless
otherwise stated capitalized terms have the same meaning herein as ascribed to them by the AGREEMENT.



	2.
	The
term of this Amendment No. 2 shall be for one RSV selling Season beginning on July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002. Thereafter, the terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall again apply in all respects, without any affect from this Amendment No. 2.



	3.
	During
the term of this Amendment No. 2, the following reporting and payment compensation shall apply for the NET SALES of PRODUCT sold for use in the TERRITORY by MEDIMMUNE or
its AFFILATES as follows:



	a.
	Within
thirty (30) days after achievement of (CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED) in net sales during the term of this Amendment No. 2 (i.e., the 2001/2002 RSV season),
ABBOTT shall pay to MEDIMMUNE (CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED).



	b.
	ABBOTT
shall receive the following payment on NET SALES of PRODUCT. 










	% Royalty
	 	Threshold

	(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)
	 	(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)

	(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)
	 	(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)

	(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)
	 	(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)

	(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)
	 	(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)

	(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)
	 	(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)






        This
Amendment No. 2 and the AGREEMENT sets forth the entire agreement and understanding between the parties as to the subject matter thereof and supersedes all prior agreements
and 









understandings in this respect. There shall be no amendments or modifications to this Amendment No. 2 or the AGREEMENT, except by a written document which is signed by both parties. 



	MEDIMMUNE, INC.	 	ABBOTT LABORATORIES


	

Name:	

/s/  MELVIN D. BOOTH      
 Melvin D. Booth	
 	

Name:	

/s/  GARY FLYNN      
 Gary Flynn
	

Title:	

President & Chief Operating Officer	
 	

Title:	

Sr. Vice President
	

Date:	

November 29, 2001	
 	

Date:	

November 16, 2001











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.23.2


AMENDMENT NO. 2

WITNESSETH
# L_2005184EN.01003701.xml

| 15.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 184/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 184/37

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1125/2005

of 14 July 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 32nd partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 32nd partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 37,9 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 July 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

2

---
Errata

The following changes were made to the document after publication on the Federal Highway Administration website: 

# image1.emf
U.S. Department 

Of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration

400 Seventh St., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

July 31, 1990 

Refer to: HNG-14/SS-19 

Mr. Dragan Stevanovic 

Manager, New Markets 

Allied Tube and conduit 

16100 South Lathrop Avenue 

Harvey, Illinois 60426 

Dear Mr. Stevanovic: 

This is in response to your July 10 letter to Mr. James H. Hatton, Jr., requesting 

acceptance by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) of your company’s SquareFit signpost system for use on Federal-aid highway projects. The FHWA breakaway 

criteria reference the requirements of Section 7 of the AASHTO Standard Specifications 

for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires and Traffic Signals, 1985. 

Square-Fit signposts are identical to your company’s Qwik-Punch posts with the 

exception that the Square-Fit holes are punched through whereas the Qwik-Punch holes 

are die-punched and must be knocked out by the end-user. This office accepted the 

Qwik-Punch signpost system on October 3, 1986, and we concur that the breakaway 

performance of the Square-Fit signposts would be similar for posts of equivalent gauge, 

dimension, and material specifications. 

Therefore, Square-Fit signposts are acceptable for use on Federal-aid highway projects 

within the range of conditions outlined in our letter of October 3, 1986, if proposed by a 

State. This acceptance is limited to breakaway characteristics of the supports and does 

not cover their structural features. Presumably, Allied Tube and Conduit will supply 

potential users with sufficient information on structural design limitations and on 

installation requirements to ensure proper performance. We anticipate that the States will 

require certification from Allied that the Square-Fit signposts furnished have essentially 

the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as those used in the QwikPunch tests, and that those supports will meet the FHWA breakaway requirements. 

Since these breakaway supports designs are proprietary items to be used in a Federal-aid 

highway project they: (a) must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally 

suitable unpatented items; (b) the State highway agency certifies that they are essential 

for synchronization with existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternate 

exists; or (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on 
relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. Our regulations concerning 

proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 

635.411, a copy of which is enclosed. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 L.A. Staron, Chief 

 Federal-Aid and Design Division 

Geometric and Roadside Design Acceptance Letter Number SS-19
#### Jerome F. WOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 52335.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 5, 1978.

Steven Jablon, Asst. Public Defender, Kissimmee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Lawrence Davis, Asst. States Atty., Kissimmee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. *State v. Lee,*356 So.2d 276 (Fla.1978).

OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and KARL, JJ., concur.
Archived - 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived - 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived - 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived - 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived - 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived - 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived - 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived - 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived - 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

Purposes 

Only
Archived - 

For 

Research 

and 

Historical 

P
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report
of SES Solar Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Christiane Erne, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.
              The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and


2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      August 11, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      CHRISTIANE ERNEChristiane
      ErneChief
      Executive Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3527 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from engaging in transactions 

involving the exchange of Special Drawing Rights issued by the International Monetary Fund that are held by the Islamic Republic of Iran, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself and Mr. MANCHIN) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from engaging 

in transactions involving the exchange of Special Drawing Rights issued by the International Monetary Fund 

that are held by the Islamic Republic of Iran, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Iran SDR Exchange 

5 Prohibition Act of 2023’’. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3527 IS

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS EXCHANGE PROHIBI2 TION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury 

4 may not engage in any transaction involving the exchange 

5 of Special Drawing Rights issued by the International 

6 Monetary Fund and held by the Islamic Republic of Iran. 

7 (b) ADVOCACY.—The Secretary of the Treasury 

8 shall— 

9 (1) vigorously advocate that the government of 

10 each member country of the International Monetary 

11 Fund, to the extent that the member country issues 

12 a freely usable currency, prohibit transactions involv13 ing the exchange of Special Drawing Rights held by 

14 the Islamic Republic of Iran; and 

15 (2) direct the United States Executive Director 

16 of the International Monetary Fund to use the voice 

17 and vote of the United States to oppose any alloca18 tion of Special Drawing Rights to the Islamic Re19 public of Iran. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
VARIAN, INC.'S JUNE 30, 2000 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             SEP-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               48,479
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       153,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                          97,138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    335,981
<PP&E>                                              197,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                      120,864
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      477,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               181,572
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                323
<OTHER-SE>                                          230,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        477,949
<SALES>                                             519,258
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    519,258
<CGS>                                               322,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       468,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    1,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      49,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                         19,316
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  30,213
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         30,213
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.90



</TABLE>
FHWA’s Long-Term Bridge Perfo

(LTBP) Program

Long-Term Bridge Performance WorkshopTransportation Research Board93rd Annual Meeting

January 16, 2014

The LTBP Protocols
Outline

• Purpose of Protocols• Sample Protocol - Key Features• LTBP Protocol Hierarchy• Future Activities• Future Challenges
Protocol, definition

a detailed plan of a scientific or medical experiment, treatment, orprocedure; for example 

Test procedure for concrete compressive strength
Purpose of the Protocols

To meet the needs of the LTBP program for high quality d

support LTBP goals; protocols ensure

• That the right types of data are collected

• From the right locations and elements on the bridg• In the right format and units, and• With the prescribed level of accuracy

• Consistency in testing procedures, including

• Numbering of components and segments• Location of sampling & testing points• Locating, measuring and characterizing defects.
Purpose of the Protocols

To meet the needs of the LTBP program for high quality d

support LTBP goals; protocols ensure

• Tests are repeatable

• From year to year by the same team • And by different teams

• Conformity with existing standard tests such as ASTM (

appropriate); for example

ASTM C 39 Compressive Strength of Concrete
Sample Protocol – Steel Superstr

Deterioration - General
Sample Protocol – Steel Superstr

Deterioration - General
Sample Protocol – Steel Superstr

Deterioration - General
Sample Protocol – Steel Superstr

Deterioration - General
XSD Templates
LTBP Protocol Hierarchy
Protocol Hierarchy
Naming Convention

XXX‐Y

S
Naming Convention

XXX‐Y

Cate
Naming Convention

XXX‐Y

Applic
Flexibility for Additional Protocols
Protocol Index
Protocol Index
Protocol Index
Protocol Index
Status of LTBP Inspection Proto

Batch # Status

1

In final stages of review for publication in an FHWA reLong Term Bridge Performance Program: Inspection Version1

2 20143 Early 2015
Future Activities

Protocol Development & Publication• Publish Version 1 Protocols Report• Complete Batch 2• Publish as an interim to Version 1 Protocols Report• Complete Batch 3• Publish Version 2 Protocols Report• Implement the protocols as they come online and when needed• Develop other protocols as deemed necessary
Future Challenges

• Train additional inspectors / data collectors• Adjust (tweak) protocols as needed based on accumulate

experience

• Adopt new technology – e.g., the RABIT• Ensure compatibility of data if/when new technology imple• Encourage wider application beyond or in support of the L

programs of the protocols, e.g.,

• State DOT research projects• Other
Questions or Comments?
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3357 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3357

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 5120 Derry Street in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, as the ``Hettie 
                  Simmons Love Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 29, 2023

  Mr. Casey (for himself and Mr. Fetterman) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 5120 Derry Street in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, as the ``Hettie 
                  Simmons Love Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HETTIE SIMMONS LOVE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5120 Derry Street in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Hettie Simmons Love Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Hettie 
Simmons Love Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 11.0


Statement re: Computation of Earnings (Loss) Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Primary      Fully Diluted
                                              ---------     -------------
<S>                                           <C>             <C>
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 1995:
 Weighted average number of Common
    Shares outstanding                        6,479,596       6,479,596
 Dilutive effect of Common Stock equivalents    472,828         472,468
                                              ---------       ---------
                                              6,952,424       6,952,064

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996:
 Weighted average number of Common
    Shares outstanding                        6,549,672       6,549,672
                                              ---------       ---------
                                              6,549,672       6,549,672

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 1997:
 Weighted average number of Common
    Shares outstanding                        6,717,142       6,717,142
                                              ---------       ---------
                                              6,717,142       6,717,142
</TABLE>