alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-76526, 33-80454,33-88302, 333-2818, 333-07457, 333-62517, 333-62983, 333-64139, 333-68161, 333-49004, 333-61412, 333-76826) of Rural/Metro Corporation of our report dated November 14, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Phoenix, Arizona 

November 14, 2007
3R Maintenance-Resurfacing Facilities for Pedestrians & Bicycles Other

$0.1M $0.1M

FLAP Obligations/Expenditures by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$0 $0 $0 $6,263 $528,452 $1,317,089 $1,851,804

FLAP Loan/Credits by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$0 $0 $0 $0 ($179,448) $909,675 $730,226

Programming Decisions Committee Members

Name Phone   E-mail Title

Jennifer Reczek 603-271-3401 Jennifer.Reczek@dot.nh.gov Project Manager

Jeff Hayes 603-279-8171 jhayes@lakesrpc.org Executive Director; North Country Cou...

Jacinda Russell 571-434-1543 Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov Access Program Manager

Call for Projects information

Start Date End Date

No. applications

received

Total Access funds

requested

11/15/2013 6/1/2014 3 $643,022

1/19/2015 4/17/2015 3 $339,600

7/15/2016 10/14/2016 2 $611,840

Local Match

17.55%

Congressional District

NH-02

NH-01

Total project's costs by FLMA Accessed

FWS 62%

NPS 22%

FS 16%

Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP)

New Hampshire

Projects Programmed

6

FLAP Funds Programmed

$1.8M

Federal Lands Highway Division

EFLHD

FLAP Allocations by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$280,498 $282,605 $276,939 $362,594 $362,527 $398,614 $1,963,777

$2M

$2M

$1.7M

$0.1M
*This information is an overview of the FLAP projects information. It is subject to change at any time. For additional details or clarifications, please contact the Federal Lands Highway Division offices or visit the State FLAP 

webpage. 

Project ID Project Name- Description Improvement type Delivery Agency Delivery 

Year

NH FLAP STTB TRL(1) Rehabilitate the Presidential Range Recreational Trail 

with a new surface and improve drainage Facilities for Pedestrians & Bicycles New Hampshire Bureau of Trails 2018

NH FLAP DOT SLR(1) Roadway grading, placing aggregate and drainage 

improvements along Stinson Lake Road. 3R Maintenance-Resurfacing NHDOT 2017

NH FLAP DOT 16(1) Rehabilitate Route 16 through Umbagog National 

Wildlife Refuge. 3R Maintenance-Resurfacing New Hampshire Department of Transportation (NHDOT) 2017

FW GREA 10(1) Great Bay Access Improvements (Arboretum Dr.) 3R Maintenance-Resurfacing Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division, FHWA 2016

NH FLAP DOT STGAD(1) Reconstruct Saint Gardens Road from Route 12A to 

Saint-Gaudens NHS in Sullivan County, NH. 3R Maintenance-Resurfacing NHDOT 2016

NH FLAP STFG DOCK(1) Construction of a wooden floating dock at the 

Umbagog Lake Boat Access in Cambridge, NH. Other NHFG 2016
© 2018 HERE, © 2019 Microsoft Corporation

Project ID

FW GREA 10(1)

NH FLAP DOT 16(1)

NH FLAP DOT SLR(1)

NH FLAP DOT STGAD(1)

NH FLAP STFG DOCK(1)

NH FLAP STTB TRL(1)
256 La. 1143

#### Grover E. MURPHY v. Everett HEAD et al.

No. 50834.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1970.

In re: Grover E. Murphy applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 240 So.2d 783.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.

SUMMERS, Justice, is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Technest Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas W. Davison, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert Tarini

Robert Tarini
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
May 23, 2005
#### Clyde H. KESINGER, Appellant, v. Carrol T. KESINGER, Appellee.

No. 70-76.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 4, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# L_2005261EN.01002801.xml

| 7.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 261/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 261/28

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 3 October 2005

appointing an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2005/688/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Netherlands Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 January 2002 the Council adopted Decision 2002/60/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period 26 January 2002 to 25 January 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 January 2002 the Council adopted Decision 2002/60/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period 26 January 2002 to 25 January 2006 (1).

| (2) | A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr G.B.M. LEERS, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr G.B.M. LEERS,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr C.H.J. LAMERS,

Burgemeester van Houten,

is hereby appointed an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions in place of Mr G.B.M. LEERS for the remainder of the latter’s term of office, which runs until 25 January 2006.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 3 October 2005.

For the Council

The President

D. ALEXANDER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 26.1.2002, p. 38.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

                In connection with the Quarterly Report ofiParty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2003,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                    TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)                    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 12, 2003 | /s/ SAL  PERISANO        |   |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                          | Sal Perisano             |
|                          | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3251 

To modify the boundary of the Lincoln Home National Historic Site in 

the State of Illinois. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2023 

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To modify the boundary of the Lincoln Home National 

Historic Site in the State of Illinois. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lincoln Home Na5 tional Historic Site Boundary Modification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LINCOLN HOME NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE BOUND7 ARY MODIFICATION. 

8 Public Law 92–127 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; 85 Stat. 

9 347) is amended— 

10 (1) in the first section— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3251 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘That, in order to’’ and in2 serting the following: 

3 ‘‘SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF LINCOLN HOME NA4 TIONAL HISTORIC SITE. 

5 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—To’’; and 

6 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(b) BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.—The boundary of 

8 the Lincoln Home National Historic Site established 

9 under subsection (a) is modified as generally depicted on 

10 the map entitled ‘Proposed Boundary Expansion of the 

11 Lincoln Home National Historic Site’ and dated February 

12 26, 2021.’’; 

13 (2) in section 2— 

14 (A) by striking the section designation and 

15 all that follows through ‘‘The’’ and inserting 

16 the following: 

17 ‘‘SEC. 2. ADMINISTRATION. 

18 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The’’; and 

19 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(b) ACCESSIBILITY.—To improve accessibility, the 

21 Secretary of the Interior shall modify the following areas 

22 located within the boundary of the Lincoln Home National 

23 Historic Site to provide universal design and accessibility 

24 without the use of sloped surfaces: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3251 IS

1 ‘‘(1) The intersection at 8th Street and Jackson 

2 Street. 

3 ‘‘(2) The area in front of the home of Abraham 

4 Lincoln.’’; and 

5 (3) in section 3, by striking the section designa6 tion and all that follows through ‘‘There are’’ and 

7 inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

9 ‘‘There are’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
January 2021 1 

Disclaimer: FHWA is committed to making its Information and Communication Technology (ICT) accessible by meeting the 

requirements of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The tools, resources, criteria and other items provided herein are 

for internal use by FHWA for ICT it procures, develops, maintains, and utilizes. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the 

use by third parties of the information contained in this document. 

Accessibility Validators 

FHWA-HAD-21-012 

An FHWA program office may create or receive a document and need to determine whether that 

document complies with the applicable Section 508 Standards before the it is made available to the 

public, or is made available internally within FHWA as non-public information required to be accessible. 

To determine Section 508 compliance, the program office may need to “validate” the document against 

the applicable standards. Testing electronic content for accessibility can be done manually, 

automatically, or by a combination of manual and automatic checksi. The tools that automatically check 

for accessibility are called validators, a variety of which are available in the marketplaceii

. A validator can 

be a function in a software program or a separate, stand-alone piece of software. An accessibility 

validator assesses a document’s conformance against an accessibility standard. The federal government 

follows the Section 508 Standards issued by the U.S. Access Board. 

Most validators can find less than 40iii percent of Section 508 non-compliance issues. For example, most 

validator software can identify figures with missing alt text; however, they cannot determine if the alt 

text is an equivalent to the figure. As a result, manual review should be used in conjunction with 

automatic validators to test a document’s compliance with the Section 508 Standards. Many of these 

manual checks are discussed in the Making ICT Accessible section of the FHWA’s Section 508 website. 

When using an automatic validator to test a document for Section 508 compliance, it is important to 

understand the compliance elements the validator is capable of identifying and those it cannot. In 

addition, a where a validator indicates a noncompliant element, it is important to check whether the 

indication could be a false positive. Manual review is critical to ensure accurate results. An automatic 

validator will not replace human judgment. 

Liken a validator to a spell checkeriv. A spell checker can identify obvious errors and may flag a name or 

technical term as incorrect. It may not catch all errors, e.g., “four this recipe use won cup of flower” 

instead of “for this recipe use one cup of flour.” No one would automatically accept the spell checker’s 

suggestion. The author still needs to review the flagged word and accept or reject the suggestion based 

on their knowledge. 

i https://www.section508.gov/test/testing-overview 

ii https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/ 

iii https://accessibility.18f.gov/tools/ 

iv https://medium.com/openconcept-stories/would-you-publish-without-spellchecking-9166ce8b00de
# L_2005200EN.01007101.xml

| 30.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 200/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 200/71

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1257/2005

of 29 July 2005

on the issue of system B export licences in the fruit and vegetables sector (peaches)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1961/2001 of 8 October 2001 on detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards export refunds on fruit and vegetables (2), and in particular Article 6(6) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 951/2005 (3) fixes the indicative quantities for which system B export licences may be issued. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 951/2005 (3) fixes the indicative quantities for which system B export licences may be issued.

| (2) | In the light of the information available to the Commission today, there is a risk that the indicative quantities laid down for the current export period for peaches will shortly be exceeded. This overrun will prejudice the proper working of the export refund scheme in the fruit and vegetables sector. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the light of the information available to the Commission today, there is a risk that the indicative quantities laid down for the current export period for peaches will shortly be exceeded. This overrun will prejudice the proper working of the export refund scheme in the fruit and vegetables sector.

| (3) | To avoid this situation, applications for system B licences for peaches after 1 August 2005 should be rejected until the end of the current export period, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

To avoid this situation, applications for system B licences for peaches after 1 August 2005 should be rejected until the end of the current export period,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for system B export licences for peaches submitted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 951/2005, export declarations for which are accepted after 1 August and before 16 September 2005, are hereby rejected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 August 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 July 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 268, 9.10.2001, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 160, 23.6.2005, p. 19. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1078/2005 (OJ L 177, 9.7.2005, p. 3).

3

---
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

DC-06 Arboretum Bridge & Trail Construction of Bridge 

and Multi-use Trail

National Park Service - 

Anacostia Riverwalk Trail; 

Department of AgricultrueUS National Arboretum

DC Department 

of Transportation DC

2018-

2019

DC-07 15th Street Bicycle Safety 

STUDY Bicycle Safety Study

National Park Service - 

National Mall and 

Memorial Parks

DC Department 

of Transportation DC 2018

DC-10 Anacostia Riverwalk Bridge & 

Trail

Construction of Bridge 

and Multi-use Trail

National Park Service - 

Anacostia Riverwalk Trail

DC Department 

of Transportation DC

2021-

2022

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the District of Columbia Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its 

multiyear Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the District of Columbia FLAP are listed below:

District of Columbia Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2017-2022

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The District of Columbia PDC does not have a firm date 

for the next Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please watch our website for updates in your state. 

https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/flap/

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
# L_2005065EN.01001901.xml

| 11.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 65/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 65/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 404/2005

of 10 March 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 4 to 10 March 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 313, 12.10.2004, p. 10.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
# - 

# - Johnstown RedevelopmentAuthority

MSGR. RAYMOND BALTA Chairman 4th Floor, Public Safety Bldg. 401 Washington Street Johnstown, Pennsylvania 15901 RONALD W. REPAK Executive Director RECEIVED EPA REGION 

### Ill

Mr. John Lovell U.S. EPA Region III 1650 Arch St. Johnstown, PA 19103-2029 RE: Pretreatment Program NPDES No. PA0026034 Dear Mr. Lovell: 814-535-6564 Fax: 814-535-6567

December 19, 2012 

### DEC 2

### 62012 MPO[ SPER M

ITS

### BRAN (3WP41) CH

Thank you for your letter ofDecember 6, 2012, and your comments regarding the Authority's 2011 annual pretreatment report. We are pleased that our overall rating for 2011 (87) is higher than the average received by all POTW's in 2010. (85.9) In your letter, you referenced an enclosed Johnstown Zinc Data Spreadsheet, but it was not attached with your submittal. Can you please provide a copy of this at your earliest convenience? We acknowledge that zinc exceedences occur at the plant, although not nearly to the level ofprevious excursions, and only occurring in the influent. (Please see attached spreadsheet.) We will prepare a sampling/evaluation plan for identifying the causes ofthese slug loads, incorporating your recommended steps. You stated in your letter that Measure 5 (NPDES Violations) is listed in Category 3 for Fecal Coliform, TSS, and CBOD. Know that the treatment plant no longer accepts gas drilling waste, and we anticipate that the number ofviolations will decrease. In accordance with your letter and the new NPDES permit, we will conduct a reevaluation of local limits and provide a sampling plan and list ofpollutants for evaluation. We respectfully request an extension of one month, or until February 12, 2013, to submit the required information.

Enclosure DW:lw

DEP , NPDES Permit, Lovell 12-19-12

.doc Sincerely,



# ~w~

Deborah Walter Pretreatment Coordinator