alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
M E M O RAND U M TO THE F I LE

Sub ject : T e l e phon e C onv er s a ti on w it h K e l c e y S t r i c k e r

, P e c h a ng a Env i r on m e n t a l D i r ec t o r

a nd Ed R o y

b a l

, P ec h a n g a

T r i b a l C ouns e l ’ s O f

f i c e R e g a r d i n g t h e L a t e C o m m e n t

L e tt e r fr o m t h e P e c h a n g a T r i b a l C h a i r m a n d a t e d M arc h 3, 2015

F r o m: K e n I s r ae l s

U

. S . Env i r on m e n t a l P r o t ec ti on A g e n c y

, R e g i on 9

D a te: M arc h 4, 201 5

O n M arc h 4, 2015, af

t er rece i v i n g t h e a

bov e c o rr e spond e n ce

, I ar r a n g e d a c on fere n ce ca ll

w it h K e l c e y S t r i c k e r

, t h e P ec h a n g a T r i b e’ s Env i r o n m e n t a l D i rec t o r

, a nd E d R o y b a l o f t h e

P ec h a n g a T r i b a l C ouns e l ’ s Off i c e t o d i s c uss t h e M arc h 3, 2015 c o mm e n t l e tt er on ou r p r opos e d

ac ti on.

W e a g r ee d t h a t t h e c o m m e n t l e tt er w a s l a t e a nd a s su c h, it w a s a t E P A’ s d i s cre ti on a s t o

w h e t h er o r no t w e w ou l d a dd re ss t h e i r c o mm e n t s. I i n f o r m e d t h e m t h a t

, re g a r d l e ss o f w h e t h er o r

no t w e w ou l d a dd r e ss t h e c o mm e n t s sub mitt e d, t h e l a t e c o mm e n t l e tt er w o u l d b e i n c l ud e d i n t h e

do c k e t f o r t h e f i n a l r u l e m a k i n g

. I a l so c on f

i r m e d w it h Ms. S t r i c k er a nd M r

. R o y b a l m y

und er s t a nd i n g t h a t t h e l a t e c o mm e n t l e tt er w a s no t a c o mm e n t a bou t ou r p r opos e d ac ti on, bu t

ra t h er a c o mm e n t on o r r e spons e t o t h e c o mm e n t s sub mitt e d b y S ou t h C o a s t A i r Q u a li t y

M a n a g e m e n t D i s t r i c t on F e b r u a r y 5, 2015

.

A s a re su lt o f

ou r c on f e r e n ce c a ll , M r

. R o y

b a l a nd Ms. S t r i c k er c on c u rre d w it h E P A’ s

pos iti on no t t o re spond t o t h e P ec h a n g a T r i b e’ s M arc h 3, 2015 l a t e c o mm e n t l e tt er

.
#### Mack Lee DIXON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BB-485.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 23, 1977.

James Ron Shelley, Public Defender, and Barry A. Cook, Asst. Public Defender, Milton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court having modified appellant’s sentence in accordance with law and this court’s order entered December 14, 1976, the judgment and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.
--------- -------~~--~-- --- --------- -~- ---- ~- _,..... __ -~ ---- -----

July 30, 2013 

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

BOB MARTINEZ CENTER 

2600 BLAIRSTONE ROAD 

TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2400 

Ms. Carol Kemker, Acting Director 

Air, Pesticides, and Taxies Management Division 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)- Region 4 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Mail Code: 9T25 

Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 

Re: Florida's Regional Haze State Implementation Plan 

Dear Ms. Kemker: 

RICK SCOTT 

GO\"ERNOR 

HERSCHEL T VINY A..RD JR 

SECRET.A..R Y 

In 2012, the State of Florida conducted case-by-case best available retrofit control technology (BART) 

determinations for its affected sources, including Unit 1 at Lakeland Electric's C.D. Mcintosh Jr. Power 

Plant. Florida submitted these determinations to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part 

of its Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP), which EPA has proposed to approve in full. 

In conducting its analysis for Unit 1, Florida assumed operation of 8760 hours (though in each of the last 

four years the unit never operated more than 125 hours) and determined that the level of control already in 

place is BART for nitrogen oxides (NOx). Unit 1 is currently required to use best operating practices for 

good combustion but has no other controls for NOx emissions and does not have a NOx emissions limit. 

Though Florida stands behind its determination for Unit 1, it recognizes that a numeric emission limit for 

NOx at Unit I reflecting best operating practices for good combustion would strengthen Florida's 

Regional Haze SIP. Therefore, the state agrees that no later than March 19, 2015, it will submit a 

Regional Haze SIP amendment to EPA that includes such an emission limit and will modify the Title V 

operating permit for the facility to include this limit. The limit will be effective no later than the effective 

date of EPA's approval ofthe SIP amendment. 

Sincerely, 

Brian Accardo, Director 

Division of Air Resource Management 

BAIPC/mb 

cc: Scott Davis, Branch Chief, Air Planning Branch, EPA Region 4 

Lynorae Benjamin, Division Chief, Air Planning Branch, EPA Region 4 

www dep state.fl us
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 3- 33 46

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Bran do n S cro gg in
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Cred it Bu reau of J on es bo ro , Inc

. ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s - J on es bo ro

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Aug us t 5 , 20 14 Fi le d: Aug us t 1 5, 2 01 4 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BYE, SMI TH, andKELLY , Cir cu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Bran do n Scro gg in ap pe al s an or de r of th e di st ric t co ur t, di rect in g hi m to pa y 1 at to rn ey ’s fees as a sa nc ti on fo r de li be rat el y m is us in g th e jud ic ia l pr oc es s. Afte r

The Hon or ab le Su sa n W eb be r Wr i g ht , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 East ern Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s.care fu l rev ie w, we fin d no ab us e of t h e d i s t ric t co ur t’s br oa d di sc ret io n to sa nc ti on

a pa rty un de r it s in he ren t po wers
. See Ch am be rs v. NASCO, In c., 50 1 U.S. 32 , 56 -5 7 (1 99 1) (p art y ’s de li be rat e m is us e of jud ic ia l pr oc es s was sa nc ti on ab le un de r co urt’s in he ren t po wers ; am ou nt of award was warra nt ed by, in te r al ia , ne ed to en su re ab us es wou ld no t be rep eat ed ); Kell y v. Gol de n, 35 2 F.3 d 34 4, 35 2 (8 th Ci r. 20 03 ) (d is tri ct co ur t ha s br oa d di sc ret io n to de ci de ap pr op ria te sa nc ti on s) ; Lam b Eng ’g & Co ns tr. Co

. v. Neb ras ka Pub. Po wer Dis t., 10 3 F.3 d 14 2 2 , 1 4 3 5 ( 8t h Ci r. 19 97 ) (in he ren t po wer de pe nd s on co nd uc t du rin g li ti ga ti on , no t on whi ch pa rty win s) ; se e al so Mar x v. Gen

. Rev en ue Co rp ., 13 3 S. Ct

. 11 66 , 11 75 -7 6 (2 01 3) (d is tri ct co ur t ha s in he ren t po wer to award at to rn ey ’s fees , no twi th st an di ng at to rn ey ’s fees pr ov is io ns of Fed eral Deb t Co ll ect io n P ract ic es Act)

.
Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
DWS VARIABLE SERIES II

   SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES OF THE LISTED PORTFOLIO:

                             ----------------------

                             DWS Strategic Value VIP

Effective July 31, 2009, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (the
"Advisor") assumed all day-to-day advisory responsibilities for the portfolio
that were previously delegated to Deutsche Asset Management International GmbH
("DeAMi") pursuant to an interim subadvisory agreement between the Advisor and
DeAMi. All references to DeAMi are hereby deleted.






               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference



August 5, 2009                                            [DWS INVESTMENTS LOGO]
VS-3622R                                                   [Deutsche Bank Group]


<PAGE>

Supplement to the currently effective Statement of Additional Information for
the listed Portfolio:

DWS Variable Series II:
         DWS Strategic Value VIP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Effective July 31, 2009, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (the
"Advisor") assumed all day-to-day advisory responsibilities for the portfolio
that were previously delegated to Deutsche Asset Management International GmbH
("DeAMi") pursuant to an interim subadvisory agreement between the Advisor and
DeAMi. All references to DeAMi are hereby deleted.




               Please Retain this Supplement for Future Reference


August 5, 2009
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.55


                      SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AND
                           OEM MANUFACTURING AGREEMENT


         The License and OEM Manufacturing Agreement ("LOEMMA") with an
effective date of July 1, 2002, by and among EchoStar Satellite Corporation,
EchoStar Technologies Corporation and Thomson multimedia Inc. is hereby amended
as follows:

         1.   Section 11.16 is amended to read:

         The Parties shall mutually agree to a trademark agreement (the
         "Trademark Agreement") to be attached as Exhibit E hereto on or before
         December 2, 2002.

         2.   Unless specifically defined herein, all defined terms will have
              the meaning ascribed to such terms in the LOEMMA. The LOEMMA shall
              remain in all other respects unchanged.



EchoStar Satellite Corporation              EchoStar Technologies Corporation

By:                                         By:
       ---------------------------                 -----------------------------

Title:                                      Title:
       ---------------------------                 -----------------------------

Date:                                       Date:
       ---------------------------                 -----------------------------


Thomson multimedia Inc.

By:
       ---------------------------

Title:
       ---------------------------

Date:
       ---------------------------
# L_2005108EN.01001901.xml

| 29.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 108/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 108/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 660/2005

of 28 April 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 26 April 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 26 April 2005.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 26 April 2005, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 31,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 April 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58.

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3648 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3648

   To amend the Post-Katrina Management Reform Act of 2006 to repeal 
         certain obsolete requirements, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2024

Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Post-Katrina Management Reform Act of 2006 to repeal 
         certain obsolete requirements, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Helping Eliminate Limitations for 
Prompt Response and Recovery Act'' or the ``HELP Response and Recovery 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF OBSOLETE DHS CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that section 
695 of the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 (6 
U.S.C. 794)--
            (1) has been rendered obsolete by changes implemented in 
        the Federal Acquisition Regulation, including amendments to 
        Federal law made by section 862 of the Duncan Hunter National 
        Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-
        417; 122 Stat. 4546); and
            (2) should be repealed.
    (b) Repeal.--The Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 
2006 (Public Law 109-225; 120 Stat. 1394) is amended by striking 
section 695 (6 U.S.C. 794).
                                 <all>
```
No. 9700.

#### Becker et al. *v.*Thierwechter.

(Decided October 30, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Ottawa County.

*587
      *Mr. William Gordon*and *Mr. Charles A. Thatcher,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. John Duff; Mr. Scott Stahl*and *Mr. George A. True,*for defendant in error. .

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         60,974
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               84,140
<PP&E>                                         15,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 94,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         505,895
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      198,177
<OTHER-SE>                                  (771,715)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   94,857
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 431,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            769,749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1,200,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (1,200,778)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                              (1,200,778)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.06)


</TABLE>
Exhibit (j)


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of Cash Reserve Fund, Inc. on Form N-1A ("Registration Statement") of
our report dated February 25, 2009 relating to the financial statements and
financial highlights which appears in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report to the
Shareholders of the Cash Reserve Fund - Prime Series, which is also incorporated
by reference into the Registration Statement. We also consent to the references
to us under the headings "Financial Statements", "Financial Highlights" and
"Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in such Registration Statement.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
April 27, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27859]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33488]


Norfolk and Western Railway Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--
Union Pacific Railroad Company

    Union Pacific Railroad Company has agreed to grant local and 
overhead trackage rights to Norfolk and Western Railway Company (NW) 
over approximately 50.2 miles of rail line located in Illinois as 
follows: (1) Local access trackage rights over approximately 4.7 miles 
of line between Monterey Lead milepost 4.4 at Monterey Mine No. 1 (near 
Carlinville) and Monterey Lead milepost 0.0 at Monterey Junction, and 
both legs of the wye track and related trackage between milepost 104.5 
and milepost 104.8 at Monterey Junction; (2) local access trackage 
rights over approximately 15.0 miles of line between milepost 104.8 at 
Monterey Junction, and milepost 119.8 at DeCamp; (3) overhead trackage 
rights over approximately 15.4 miles of line between milepost 119.8 at 
DeCamp and milepost 135.2 at Edwardsville; and (4) overhead trackage 
rights over approximately 15.1 miles of line between milepost 135.2 at 
Edwardsville and milepost 150.3 at Madison. The transaction is expected 
to be consummated on or soon after October 15, 1997, the effective date 
of the exemption.
    The purpose of the proposed trackage rights is to permit the 
movement of coal traffic directly between Monterey Mine No. 1 and 
Madison, IL, and on to Coffeen, IL, entirely via NW; and to eliminate 
costly delays in handling and interchanges.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If the notice 
contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab 
initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may 
be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not 
automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33488, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001 and served on: James R. Paschall, General 
Attorney, Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Three Commercial Place, 
Norfolk, VA 23510-2191.

    Decided: October 14, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27859 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P