N O T I C E 

THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM 

MICROFICHE. ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT 

CERTAIN PORTIONS ARE ILLEGIBLE, IT IS BEING RELEASED 

IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE AS MUCH 

INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE 
V I

FINAL REPORT

August 15, 1985

CONTRACT NAS8-36134

COMPLETE SURVEY OF STARS REAPER THAN 25 PARSECS

(VISA -C8-178544) IN UNBIASED I-BAT SABRIIHG P16-14206

)I STABS NITBIN 25 PARSECS OF THE SUN Final

leport (Lockheed dissiles and Space Co.)

32 p BC A03/NF 101 CSCL 03A Unclas

G3/89 15835

LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE CO., INC.

3251 BNOVER ST.

PALO ALTO, CA 94304

Dr. H. M. Johnson

Principal Investigator

40, 411^

^^ Z

Preuared for George C. ,anmhall Soace Flight Center

Marshall 'S pace Flight Center, ;L 3512
AN UNBIASED R-R4Y SAMPLING 0? STARS WrMN 25 PARSECS .:YE SUN

Hugh M. Johnson

Lockheed Missiles and Space Company

Received Year Month Date

ABSTRACT

The paper reports a search of all of the Einstein Observatory

IPC and HRS fields for untargeted stars in the Woolley et al. Catalogue

of the nearby stars. Optical data and IPC coordinates, flux density

Fx, and luminosity Imo, or upper limits, are tabulated for 126 single

or blended systems, and HRT_ results for a few of them. IPC luminosity

functions are derived for the systems, for 193 individual stars in the 

systems (with Lx shared equally among blended components), and for 63

individual M dwarfs. These stars have relatively large X-ray flux

densities that are free of interstellar extinction, because they are

nearby, but they are otherwise unbiased with respect to the X-ray

properties that are found in a defined small space around the Sun.
FIML REPORT

ccirrmm NAs8-36134

Work continued satifactorily following the Midterm Report on the

lines outlined then. Work is now ccnplete with the result of a paper

prepared for publication. A eop.­ the manuscript, entitled "An

Unbiased X-Ray Sampling of Stars .:.ithin 25 Parsecs of the Sun," is

at*ached. The manuscript cover-page abstract and the page 12 conclusions provide a surmry of the findings and conclusions of the research.

Thus, the paper reports a search of all of the 'Einstein Observator

IPC and HRI fields for untargeted stars in the Wooll —ey-leT"al. Cataiogue

of the nearby stars. Optical data and IPC coordinates,^ -densi y

E, and luminosity I&, or upper limits, are tabulated for 126 single

or blended systems, and HRI results for a few of them. IPC luminosity

functions are derived for the systems, for 193 individual stars in the

systems (with Lx shared equally among blended comoonents), and for 63

individual M dwarfs. These stars have relatively large X-ray flux

densities that are free of interstellar extinction, because they are

nearby, but they are otherwise unbiased with respect to the X-ray

properties that are found in a defined small space around the Sun.

Several tables exhibit the X-ray properties of the untargeted

nearby stars in the IPC and HRI fields. The X-ray luminosities range

over three orders of magnitude among detected stars. A few of them

show evidence of variability. Luminosity functions include stars with

less than 3-sigmas upper limits on L by resort to a s pecial algorithm.

These luminosity functions peak at-he lowest detectable I, x . Young-disk

dwarf V stars occupy a range of higher 1,. than old-disk dwarf M stars,

with an overlap of ranges. A few stars with upper-limit L below the

lowest detectable L are old-disk, and the Einstein Observatory was

unable to detect sFirs near the faint end of the lMdnosity range unless

they were within v ry few parsecs. Thus the distribution of stellar L

below about 3 x 10 6 ergs s-1 remains to be found in a future observational

progran.

No other publication is planned from this contract, but the P.I.

draws attention to a reference in the manuscript to D. E. Harris and

H. M. Johnson, "high-Resolution X-Ray Observations of Nearby Binery.

Systems: Flaring and bvidence for Unseen Companions," in Astrophys. J.,

2h9, 649, 1985, where 1 RI observations of four stars were presen e in

such detail as to justify the omission of further discussion of them in

this manuscript.
t

AN UNBIASED R-RAY SAMPLING OF STARE WITHIN 25 PARSECS OF THE SUN

Hugh M. Johnson

Lockheed Missiles and Space Company

Received Year Month *Date

ABSTRACT

The paper reports a search of all of the Einstein Observatory

IPC and HRI fields for untargeted stars in the Woolley et al. Catalogue

of the nearby stars. Optical data and IPC coordinates, flux density

Fx, and luminosity L., or upper Units, are tabulated for 126 single

or blended systems, and MI results for a few of them. IPC luminosity

ft7nctions are derived for the systems, for 193 individual stars in the

systems (with 

x 

shared equally among blended components), and for 63

individual M dwarfs. These stars have relatively large X-ray flux

densities that are free of interstellar extinction, because they are

nearby, but they are otherwise unbiased with respect to the X-ray

properties that are found in a defined small space around the Sun.
2

I. INTRODUCTION

About 4000 target pointings were made with the Imaging Pr000rtional 

Counter (IPC) of the Einstein Observatory (E0) and another 800 with its

High Resolution Imager (HRI) as identified in Seward and Macdcnald (19 °3).

The nominal fields of view are, respectively, one square degree and

0.14 square degree. Many objects besides targets may be found in these

areas, and some targets were not detected. Among the untargeted potential

objects are stars in Woolley et al.'s (1970) Catalogue cf Stars within

25 Parsecs of the Sun (`WEPP in the following). Since WEPP does not .

include all of the stars in Gliese + s (1969) catalog, it was tracked

in parallel with. WEPP in the search of all EO fields. It is clearly.

worth finding and discussing the untargeted Gliese/WEPP stars because,

unlike selected targets, they represent an unbiased sampling of a

specific volume, and they are mostly cataloged with an absolute

trigonometric parallax, p, so that their X-ray flux density Fx

(ergs cm-2s-l ) may be reduced to X-ray luminosity Lx s 1.2 x 1033

p 

2- (ergs s -1 ). Most other untargeted stars in EO fields, on the

contrary, have not been measured for so that only a ratio of log F

to an optical apparent magnitude might be given for them. This ratio

is not very informative in comparison with X-ray data coupled with p.

The reprocessed production data from the Einstein Data Bank

(cf. Harris and Irwin 1984) are the basis for this work. The primary

data are centroid coordinates of each detected image, and counts s-1

in a detector area and detector passband, corrected for background,

vignetting, mirror scattering, detector spread of image, and for

interruptions.of exposure after start. Catalog stars must be detected 

to 3 0- above background to be listed as IPC imaged in the Einstein Data 

'_
Bank; otherwise they are listed as upper limits. Conversion of

counts s -1 in the IPC broadband (0.2 - 3.5 keV) to F. depends next

on the generally unknown X-ray source spectrum. Although pulse-height

channel counts for sufficiently strong IPC sources -may be fitted to

model spectra, such sources were not found here. A "hardness ratio,"

defined as the source counts in the 0.8 -3.5 keV channels less the

source counts in the 0.2 - 0.8 keV channels, normalized to source

counts in all channels, also has too large statistical errors to be

a significant spectral index for most sources here.. A bimodal temperature

distribution for thin plasma was suggested by the EO Solid State

Spectrometer data for the only two red dwarfs observed with it (Swank

and Johnson 1982), but isothermal coronae at a single canonical

temperature are assured for all sources in this sampling. This is

permissible for the derivation of F. since it has been shown (cf.

Harris and Irwin 1984) that a conversion factor of 2 x 10-11 ergs

c^ 2s

-1 per IPC count a -1 reasonably well represents a large range

of temperature around kT = 1 keV for Raymond thermal plasma spectra

(Raymond and Smith 1979). White dwarfs may be exceptions to this

procedure because it is believed that they are photosnheric rather

than coronal sources of X-rays (Kahn et al. 19810, and may thus require

different treatment. Nevertheless formal values of the up per limits

on coronal (i.e. thin-plasma) Lx will be given for the white dwarfs

that fall in the survey fields.

HRI results have been briefly given earlier (Johnson 19811) but 

with I& derived according to the procedure in Cash, Charles, and

Johnson (1990) for a defined plasma in cooling equilibrium. In this
-4-.

paper the HRI flux density is converted to L

ac

in a way analogous to

the IPC method but with the factor 6 x 10-11 ergs cm-23 -1 per HRI

count Cl in the band 0.15 - 4.0 keV. Among stars in HRI fields are

the resolvable components of four binaries 01 34AB, Gl 338AB, G1 570

AB, and G1 669A$) which have been discussed in detail by Harris and.

Johnson (1995) so that it is unnecessary to include their HRI results

here.

The frequent occurrence of binaries that are unresolvable with

either the IPC or the HRY is a problem for X-ray astronomy. The ratio

Of 6 between the components is generally not known and not predictable

even when several other physical parameters are well known, because Lx

has been found over a large range among single stars that are optically

classified alike (cf. Johnson 1993). This problem will be discussed

in § III.

II. THE SAMPLE STARS

a) Optical Properties

EO targets are excluded from this work unless they must be considered

in connection with blended binary-star images. In those cases where only

one component of a binary is clearly specified as a target, the unspecified

component will be included as an untargeted star in this study. It may

not be certain whether the targeted component is the sole or even the

dominant X-ray source in a blended image.

Both components of binaries with blended images (or potentially

blended if undetected) are given in Table 1, the optical properties of

the whole sample, so that IPC target stars in blended images are thus

tabulated. The remarks column of Table 1, otherwise reserved for optical
-5-

information, identifies such targets by T. T followed by an EO sequence

number indicates that the star'has been a target in another IPC observation

than the one used in this sample, where it is unt•argeted. Most of the

Table 1 data are from WEPP,' with their notations, e.g. P attached to

magnitudes that are photographic rather than V. and J attached to joint

magnitudes of photometrically blended binaries. The parallax and its

probable error (p.e.) in the third column are from WEPP, except for

improved values in Gliese and Jahreiss (1979) and for 01 323AB from

van Altena (1985). One value of ap.e. is assigned to all components

of binaries and multiples. The 01 395(C) parallax is based on the

common proper motion (c.p.m.) noted in Hoffleit and Jaschek (1982).

Following WEPP, (S) stands in place of p.e. for spectroscopic parallaxes.

One binary, G1 698AB, received p 0:033 in Gliese and Jahreiss (1979),

which removes it from the WEPP space. It is kept in the tables but is

omitted from the data that are discussed in § III.

An exception to WEPP are the white dwarf data in Table 1, from

?'Cook and Sion (1984).

Parenthetical binary-star designations are added to the GliesetdEPP

numbers when they are useful, e.g. lower-case (ab) indicates spectroscopic

binaries, also found as SB in the remarks. The number in parentheses

that sometimes follows SB gives the range of velocities (k-.R s -1 ) observed

in the system, while SB1 or SB2 denote single-line or double-line SB's.

Finally the notation may shbw that an SB orbit (0) has been published.

Visual binary separation and position angle or the semi-major axis of an

oribit are noted. Some bite ry data from Hoffleit and Jaschek (1982),

attributed to C. Worley (W) supersede WEPP, and some of their data
0

-6-

vary from WEPP, e.g. the respective identifications of components A

and H in HD 10360-1. Optical as well as physical companions are noted

when X-ray blending is possible. The v sin i measure of stellar rotation

in km s-1 is sometimes available in Hoffleit and Jaschek (1992). Finally,

the young disk (YD) and old disk (OD) age classification follows Eggen's

(1969) kinematical definition, using velocity components in WEPP.

b) IPC Observations

The data are divided into detections in Table 2 and upper limits

in Table 3. Upper limits on F. and L, are 30', computed by the EO

LOCAL DETECT procedure in the broad band. The first column of Table 2

matches the corresponding names in Table 1 but omits target stars and

combines binary or multiple stars with blended iaages into one entry.

The coordinates of the IPC broadband image are followed by the difference,

X-0, between the X-ray image coordinate and the WEPP optical coordinate

of a single star or, arbitrarily, the first listed component of a binary

or multiple, after applying proper motion to the optical coordinate from

1950 epoch to the epoch of the beginning of the X-ray exposure. The IPC

broadband F. and the 10' statistical error follow next, then the

corresponding I&, and the U.T. epoch date. Values of LX that depend

on spectroscopic parallaxes are marked with a colon. A mean <P.

0:016 is adopted for the blend of WEPP 9124,5,7 in an image, for their

_c •

Some stars have a detected image at one epoch but at, up per limit

at another, so that they enter both Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.

Analysis for the probability that a star is secularly constant in X-ray

emission during a given observation, typically — 2 x 103 9 of effective
.

-7-

exposure, indicates possible variability by a value for the probability

of le:+s then 0.01 in 01 490AB on 1980 June 30 9 WEPT 955OA3 on 1981

January 11), -. .id Gl 66;'AB on 1979 March 27. For the latter see Harris

and Johnson (1985)• All a' the designated optical variables in Table 1

are flare stars, except WEPP 9 50A(sb) which is an R4 CVn spectroscopic

binary, TZ CrB. When TZ CrB war, the target in the 1979 January 28

observation the joint h e wit'- WEP? 9550B was double the point I on

1981 January 10, but the'esrlier epoch does not reveal possible variability

in the standard analysis despite the higher Lx. Five of the stars in

Table 2 had too few counts to accom plish the standard analysis for

variability.

Variability over periods longer than the time devoted to one epoch,

defined as one EO sequence number, may be shown by comparing the data

for stars observed at more than one epoch. The result is that F x is

constant within errors at the two epochs of WEPP 9537 and WEPP 95WBC,

but a variation of Fx in G1 659AB is more likely. The upper limits of

Fx for those stars that are also detected at another epoch are generally

greater than the FX at detection, except for G1 687(ob), which had too

few counts in the detection to confirm variability.

e) HRI Observations

Table 4 presents the untargeted data, with the omissions noted in

i I. Unlike IPC data the HRI upper limits are estimated from the F.

value of the weale st source detected. Gl 216A is the only HRI star

without an IPC counterpart in Tables 2 or 3. The standard analysis

for variability in the images of Gl 216A and 01 216B formally resulted

in a nil probability of constant Fx . They are not optical variables,
A

,.

and the X-ray behavior is undoubtedl3 related to the extension of

the 8479 s of net time in the processed images from a start on 1980

March 17 to an and on 1981 February 24. 01 216C a PB1 is, unfortunately,

outside the HKI field of vim.

III. IPC CENSUS AND LUMNOSITY FUNCTIOItS

Counting only the untargeted stars in Table 1 that contribute to

the detections of Table 2 or the upper limits of Table 3, but counting

known individual components of untargeted visual or spectroscopic

binaries in blends, one finds seven A. eight F, 27 G, 30 K, and 63 M

dwarfs (whether prefixed d or classified in the MK system), as well

as fifteen F, G, or K stars without any, luminosity label. All M stars

without any luminosity label have been considered as dwarfs. In

addition there are three white dwarfs and 36 unclassified stars. The

latter have escaped classification because cf faintness or membership

in spectroscopic binaries. Finally, four A. F, or G stars of luminosity

class III or IV make a total of 193 known stars. This is 8.4% of the

2294 known stars counted individually in WEPP. The WEPP stars in the

volume 25 pe in radius are, in turn, only a small percent of the number

expected from an extrapolation of the density in volumes of a:maller

radii where the fainter ones are more completely counted (cf. Gliese

1981). Many of the unidentified stars within any given distance my

have been detected either optically or with the IPC, but they cannot

be tabulated for lack of their parallaxes.

One of the incompletely solved problems of classical astronomy

is the deterdnation of the empirical luminosity function in the solar

neighborhood, or the local population density of at.ars as a function

of absolute magnitude. In order to provide an analogous general

i

3s

{
luminosity function of log I&, :an unbiased sample such as the present

One of WEPP stars in untargeted IPC fields is an essential starting

point. This leaves open the question of whether an unbiased sample

of WEPP stars is also an unbiased sample of X-ray sources within 25 pc

of the Sun. Nevertheless it is clear that a luminosity function instead

composed of targeted stare might be spectacularly biased toward

"interesting" types. The unbiased luminosity function should show

the onset and shape of the bright and under defined conditions, but

underpopulation must progressively characterize the taint end. This

is evident because the 3C upper lind.ts on 90% of the IPC-undetected

WEPP stars of Table 3 are produced with lose than 3 x 10 -2 count 8'1,

so that stellar Inc of 4.5 x 1028 ergs a-1 will usually be detected to

r n 25 pas but stellar .^c of 4.5 x 10 I 26 ergs s'1 only to r n 2.5 pc.

The threshold needed for 3 Or depends on background, source position

in field, and other factors. In order to use the available sample

most fully, the upper limits on nc in Table 3 will be included in the I

luminosity function by the method of Avni at al. (1980), which will

partially correct the selection effect against weak X-ray sources.

Further selection effects are embedded in the data. The first

one is the unknown share of total Lx among n > 1 components of blended

IPC images. The extreme alternatives are to give the total Lto one

zx

of the components, or to give n

-1 14 to each component. Let us assume

that n is not greater than known from the optical information about

apparently individual stars (n r 1) or systems (n > 1), and assign LX

to single stars and n"lIto each co nconent is physical systems. This

excludes optical companions that are not physical components.
•. ^ X10- ..

Finally, arW star observed more than once with different values

of ^,, or upper limits on Imo, is assigned the minimum value in the

range - on the assumption that a quiescent state of L. is longer lasting

and more typical than flaring or other active periods.

Table 5 presents a general luminosity function for the IPC data

according to the given precepts. The first column lists factor of 2

bins of Lx for tha nu.•nber of dtteeted stars in try second column.

Undetected stars in the third column are binned so that each upper

limit on 

-LX 

is lose thari the geometrical man (central value) of the

adjacent higher bin, as in Avni at al. (1980). The undetected stars

are redistributed in the fourth cola-m, according to the likelihood

function formulated by Avni at al. ( 1980), and are added to the detected

stars to make the total effective ' number of stars in each bin of the

last column. The three stars of lowest upper limits on 

LX cannot be

assigned to the last three bins since no stars were detected in them.

The luminosity function shows that the relative n •.unber of nearby stars

per equal step of log Lx increases as Lk decreases to about 3 x 1026

ergs a-1 , but the peak may reflect only a limitation on the power of

the £0 to detect less lundnous sources in the WE?? sample.

Anoth'r luminosity function -my be derived for the WEPP systems.

This uses the blended LL of binaries and multiples in the some way an

the I^ of single stars, but excludes all systems that contain any

targeted comnonents. The lu±+dnosity function of systems foregoes the

optical knowledge of systems multiplicities and avoids arbitrariness

in assuring the relative luminosities of the components. Table 6 gives

the results for the 126 systems, presented as in Table 5. The very
-11-

luminous system at11.3 x 1030 ergs a -1 &^ the RS Con system T2

CrB which was once targeted but also once fell in an IPC field that

had targeted an extragalactic radio source. As compared with the

general luminosity function in Table 5, the luminosity function of

WEPP systems has two peaks rather than one, but the more populous

peak is again at the lower I,. The faintest upper limits cannot be

added into effective numbers in any bins below this peak.

A luminosity function for just M dwarfs follows the precepts for

the general luminosity function. Several stars that are spectroscopically

unclassified in Table 1 may be M dwarfs or white dwarfs according to Mv.

They are excluded from the present luminosity function. All 23 detected

M dwarfs are classifiable as YD or OD, but 12 of the 40 M dwarfs left

u:A etected as upper limits on 

x 

lack some of the kinematical data

that are required for the age classification. In Table 7 the data for

detections are subdivided in.o YD or OD stars, but the upper limits are

not so subdivided. Table 7 shows that the seven most luminous detected

M dwarfs are YD, while the six least luminous are equally divided between

YD and OD. The three M dwarfs with upper limits of L ( 3.4 x 1026

x

ergs s -1 (namely G1 2838, 01 6668, and 01 699 - Barnard i s star) are

also OD stars. The results clearly show in an unbiased way that

young-disk M dwarfs tend to be m-)re luminous X-ray sources than old-disk

M dwarfs are, but with an overlap in the range 2.5 x 1026 < Lx

1.6 x

1028 ergs s-1 . The effective number of M dwarfs relative to the effective

nurber of all stars per bin in the general luminosity function .fluctuates

from. 17% to 58%, but the percentage shows little trend through a range

of 103 in Lx.

tlr
•12-

IV. CONCLUSIONS

Several tables exhibit the X-ray properties of the untargeted

nearby stars in IPC and HRI fields of the E0. The birBries and

multiples of 126 pystems are usually blended in X-ray images but,

when that is so, they have been optically analyzed to make a total

of 193 individual stars of a wide variety. The X-ray luminosities

of detected stars range over three orders of magnitude. A few of

them show evidence of variability. Luminosity functions of systems,

of all individual stars, and of the M dwarfs and presented, including

stars with less than 3 4— upper limits on 

z 

by resort to a special

algorithm. These luminosity functions peak at the lowest detectable

Imo. ID dwarf M stars occupy a range of higher 

L 

than OD dwarf K

stars, with an overlap of ranges.. A few stars with upper-limit LX

below the lowest detectable I. are old-disk, and the EO was unable

to detect stars near the faint end of the luminosity range unless

they were within very few parsecs. Thus the dis^ribution of stellar

15, below ~ 3 x 1026 ergs s 1 remains to be found in a future

observational program.

This work has been done as an Einstein. Guest Investigator

program under NASA contract NASB-361311. I thank D. E. Harris for

programming the search for all of the Einstein Data Bank fields that

contain WEPP stars, and Sherene Aram and F. D. Seward for reprocessing

these fields in a timely way. W. van Altena checked a list of the

systems that lacked trigonometric parallaxes in 1970 and confirmed

that only G1 323 + B has since then been measured for p.
TABLE 1

Optical Properties of the IPC and HRI Samples of Stars

Gliese/ Other p+p.e. Spectral Age

WEPP Name (01001) Type V

v

Group Remarks

5 ADS 69A 6917 KO V 6.14 - 5.33 YD CaIIem,B,C,D opt.?,sep.>153"

9006 LTT 10091 45±12 a 13.8P - 14.2P ... NUT color class

28 HD 3765 72±7 K2 V 7.35 6.64 OD CaIIem

33 HD 4628 143±4 K2 V 5.75 6.54 OD T5433,WAB 18112 opt.?

35 WD 0046+051 239±1 DZ7 12.41 14.30 OD T861

38 Wolf 33 55±4 dM2 11.5 10.2 OD ...

9035 HD 5817 40±10 dG2 8.4 6.4 OD ...

9052A HD 7895 46±6 K1 V 8.00: 6.3 OD AB 27:8,2090

9052B ADS 1057B 46±±6 KO 10.73 _ 9.0 OD ...

66A(ab) HD 10360 148±7 KO V 5.82: 6.67 YD SB

66B HD 10361 148±7 KO V 5.86 6.71 YD WAB 10.8 orb.

70 LTT 10604 11014 dM2 10.95 11.2 OD ...

9067A +3°275 43±12 dK5 10.6 8.8 YD AB 15"

9067B LTT 10690 43±12 M2 12.4 10.6 YD ...

9073A HD 13043 40±7-• G2 V 6.90 4.9 OD AB 84",339°

9073B Ross 681 40±7 ... 10.52 8.5 OD B-V-+1.24

9074 Ross 17 46±12 M3 15.4P 13.7P ... ...

86 HD 13445 89±7 KO V 6.12 • 5.87 OD ...

9087 HD 16287 44±12 KO 8.10 6.3 ... ...

9092A HD 16619 43±12 dG4 7.83J 6.O.i OD a-0:148

9092E ADS 2028B 43±12 ... 9.0 7.2 OD ...

121 HD 18978 58±9 AS V 4.09 2.9 YD vin 1-144

147 HD 22484 61±5 F8 V 4.28 3.21 YD T5455,v sin 1-0

9124 Yale 781 44±11 F8 10.8 900 ... ...

9125 Yale 782 48±13 GO 11.0 9.4 ... ...

9126 HD 23232 51±13 K2 9.2 7.7 ... ...

9127 Yale 786 46±11 G3 11.2 995 ... ...

9131 HD 23585 48±13 A9 V 8.4 6.8 YD ...

9132 HD 23713 45±10 F6 V 9.5P 7.8P YD ...

9135 HD 283066 44±16 dK6 HAP 9.6P ... CaIIem

9137 -37.01501 54±8 K 12.8P 11.5P OD ...

157A HD 24916 102±12 dK5 8.06 8.1 YD T, AB 11",20°

157B(ab) ADS 2894B 102±12 dM3e 11.48 11.5 YD SB(35)

160 HD 25680 69±5 G5 V 5.90 5.09 YD v sin i-3,WAB 170."1 opt.

9849 ... 50±8 ... 15.0 14.2 ... ...

9850 ... 58±9 ... 16.5 .15.3 ... ...

9157(ab) HD 28527 52±10 A6 IV 4.78J, 3.4J YD SB, v sin is71,WAB 250"opt.?

9158 HD 28946 43±13 K1 8.0 6.2 ... ...

9159A Aldebaran 50±5 K5 III 0.85V -0.64V YD T,AB 30"4,110 0 ,

9159B ADS 3321E 50±5 dM2 13.2 11.7 YD ...

172 HD 232979 93±6 K8 V 8.61 8.45 YD -weak CaIIem

180 LTT 2116 83±6 M3 12.5P 12.1P OD ...

9177 HD 33811 40±14 G5 8.71 6.7 ... ...

201 HD 35171 63 ±5 dK5 7.97 7.0 YD CaIIem
TABLE 1 -Continued

Gliese / Other p+p.e. Spectral Age

WEPP Name (0:0001) Type V

v

Group Remarks

209 HD 37124 55±11 G4 V 7.61 6.3 OD ...

9185 HD 37656 42±12 K5 V 9 . 32 7.4 YD ...

9186 HD 37495 46±9 F4 V 5.28 3.6 YD v sin 1-31

216A HD 38393 123±8 F6 V 3.60 4.05 YD AB 96:3,350° , v sin i-11

216E HD 38392 123±8 K2 V 6.15 6.60 YD T

9191 HD 39194 47±13 KO V 8.09 6 . 5 OD ...

9205 HD 42250 43±11 dG7 7.43 5.6 OD ...

9209A HD 44120 42±12 G3 V 6 . 44 4.6 OD AB 40:6,3020 ,also 38:3 opt.

9209B WD0615-591 42±12 DB4 14.09 11.42 OD ...

233A HD 45088 64±5 dK3 6.74 5.8 YD T , AB 1:66,304°

233E ADS 5054B 64±5 ... 13.8 12 . 8 YD ...

234A V577 Mon A 246±3 dM4e 11.07J 13,02J YD T,a=0:98

234E V577 Mon B 246±3 ... 14.4 16 . 4 YD ...

250A HD 50281 104±8 dK6 6.66 6 . 75 YD T , AB 58;177°

250B LTT 2663 104*-8 M2 10 . 11 10.20 YD ...

263 NSV03363 60±5-• M5 11.4 10.3 ... ...

283A WD0738- 172 125 ±-7 DZQ6 12 . 98 13.42 OD T,AB 21;276°

283B LTT 2916 125±7 M 17.6P 18.4P OD ...

9248 +14°1802 56±12 dK8 10 . 30 • 9.0 YD Callem

9265 +2901754 43(S) dK8 9.65 7.8 ... ...

9269 ED 72769 40±12 dG5 7.19 5.2 YD ...

'311 HD 72905 69±5 GO V 5.64 4.83 YD v sin i=4

9275A HD 74385 49±12 KO 8.10 6.6 YD AB 45",188°

9275B ITT 3222 49 ±12 M1 14.6P 13.1P YD ...

9276 HD 74772 49± 11 G5 III 4.06 2.5 YD AB 45"3 , 630 opt.

9278A HD 74956 48 ±7 AO V 1.95J 0.4J YD T , AB 2:6 , 153sin 1-40 °,v

9278B Yale 2098 ( B) 48±7 ... 5.1 3.5 YD ...

9278C Yale 2098( C) 48±7 ... 11.0 9 . 4 YD AC 69':2,61°

9878D Ya;e 9098 ( D) 48±7 ... 13 . 5 11.9 YD CD 6:2,1020

323A +8 2131 60±5 dMOp 9 . 08J 8.OJ YD AB 2:6,1190

323B ADS 7044E 60±5 ... 9 . 9 8.8 YD ...

324A HD 75732 74±7 G8 V 5.97 5.32 YD T,AB 85",1290

324B ITT 12311 74±7 M5 13.15 12.50 YD ...

331A( ab) NSVO4329 66±6 A7 V 3.14 2.24 YD T,AB 4.5,16° , SB10,v sin 1-151

331B LTT 12348 66±6 dMl 11.4 10.5 YD ...

331C ADS 7114C 66±6 ... 11.7 10.8 YD a=0':680

9298 +40°2208 42(S) dK8 9.88 8.0 OD ...

346 -8°2689 53(3`) dMO 10.49 9.1 ... ...

363 LFT 672 71±11 M5 14 . 2P 13.5P ... ... i

9316B HD 87884 41±14 K1 V 8.14 6.2 YD AB 177;307°

9316C ADS 7654C 41±14 ... 13.5 11.6 YD BC 2:5,360

9316D ADS 7654D 41 ± 14 ... ... ... YD AD 217 ; 274°a(WEPP ' a,6 incorrect)

384A HD 88746 66±13 G8 V 8 . 12J 7 . 2J YD AB 5:3",127

384B Yale2403 ( B) 66±13 ... 10.8 9 . 9 YD ...

9322 HD 88725 43±6 G1 V 7.76 5.9 OD ...

9324 NSVR4822 51±12 F6 IV 4.80 3.3 YD v sin 1=16,6 Sct var.?

394 +56` 1458 77 ±5 K7 V 8.69 8 . 1 YD T,AB 12011, 3040,394 -395(B) , c.p.m.

395(A) HD 90839 77 ±5 F8 V 4.84 4 . 27 YD AC 139", v sin 1-0

-^- -- -
TABLE 1-Continued

Gliese/ Other p+p.e. Spectral Age

WEPP Name ( 0:0001) Type V My Group Remarks

395(C) +5701266 77 t5 ... 8.2 7.6 YD dm: Hoffleit and Jaschek(1982)

417 HD 97334 42(S) GO V 6.3 4.4 YD? WAB 138:7 opt.,v sin i<6

9357 HD 98281 54±T G8 V 7.30 6.0 OD ...

427 WD1121+216 78 =3 DZ7 14.12 13.58 OD ...

428A HD 99279 90 '6 K7 V 7.21J 6.98J YD AB 5"8

428B Yale 2645B 90 ±6 MO V 8.6 8.4 YD Callem

450 +3602219 125±9 M1 V 9.78 10.26 YD CaIIem

9394 HD 106038 41±11 F6 V-VI10 . 18 8.2 OD ...

9404 +29 2279 51±10 M2 V 10.62 9.2 OD ...

461 +102684 60(S) dMO ' 10.2 9.1 YD Callem

464 HD 107888 50±10 dM2 10.4 8.9 YD ...

471 +9°2636 6917 dMl 9 . 78 8.97 OD c.p.m. with 469

475(ab) NSVR5725 109 ±6 GO V 4.27 4 . 46 YD SB10, v sin i <3

9418 +71 632 4019 K8 9.5 7.5 OD ...

490A +36°2322 48±6 Me 10 . 60 9.01 YD AB 17" , CaIIem

4908 NSV26039 48±6-• dMe 13 . 16 11.57 YD CaII strong em

9427 +35 2406 51(S) dK8 9.34 7.9 YD "

9441 HD 115892 51±T A2 V 2.73 1.3 YD

;

vin 1=85

509A HD 116495 54±5 dMO 8.901 • 7.6J YD AB 0.7

509B ADS 8887B 54±5 dK6 9.7 8.4 YD ...

513 LTT 13924 55±12 M5 13.SP 12 . 2P OD ...

9447 Ross 476 47 ±20 dM6 14 . 34 12.6 ... C.P.M. wish G1 515(T) , AB 500"

516A VW Com 57±8 dM4e 11.391 10.2J OD AB 310,22

z. 516B Vyss 144B 57±8 Me 11.5 10.3 OD ...

527A NSV06444 57±9 F7 V 4.50 3.3 YD T,AB 5:4,7 0 ,v sin 1=14

527B ADS 9025B 57±9 M2 10 . 6 9.4 YD ...

528A HD 120476 87*_7 dK6 7.04J 6.71J YD AB 2.4

528B ADS 9031E 87±7 dK6 8.2 7.9 YD ...

534(ab) HD 12 .1370 102+5 GO IV 2.68 2 . 72 YD T851 , SB10 , v sin 1=13,

536 HD 122303 92±8 dMO 9.8 9.6 ... ...

9468 HD 123505 40±5 G9 V 9.68 7.7 OD ...

547 HD 126053 61±5 G1 V 6.27 5.20 OD v sin 1=1

548A +24 2733 65±7 dMl 9.71 8.77 OD AB 45:4,74°

548B BDS 6869E 65±7 dM2 9.9 9.03 OD ...

549A NSV06669 68±6 F6 V 4.06 3.22 OD T,AB 69:2,182 0 ,v sin 1=34

549B LTT 14246 68±6 M3 11.8P 11.OP OD ...

9480 +24°2735 50±±8 dMO 10.91 9.4 OD ...

561 +2702411 52±18 G5 9.5 0.1 YD ...

566A HD 131156 153*_4 G8 V 4.54J 5.46J YD T10418, a=4.9,CaIIem,v sin 1=3

566B ADS 9413B 153 ±4 K5 V 6.91 7 . 70 YD Callem

567(ab) NSy06847 84±7 K1 V 6.04 5.66 YD SB(25)-

9515 +8 3000 42(S) dMO 10.6 8.7 ... ...

9516 HD 135379 52±10 A3 V 4 . 07 2.7 YD v sin 1=59

584A NSV07054 61±4 G2 V 4.98J 3.91J YD a=0: 839, AC 58" opt.

584B ADS 9617B 61±4 G2 V 5.9 4.8 YD AB-SB20

9533 HD 143291 44±5 KO V 8.02 6.2 YD ...

A

^'I
TABLE 1-Continued

liese/ p+P.e. Spectral Age

PP Other Name (01001) Type V My Group Remarks

537 HD 143761 42±8 G2 V 5.42 3.5 OD v sin 1-7 WAB 79.6 opt._

9542(ab) HD 144287 5336 G8 V 7.10 5.7 OD SB

9549 LTT 14836 64±8 ... 12.24 11.3 YD c.p.m. with 9550AB

9550A(ab) TZ CrB 43±5 GO V 5.66 3.8 YD T3219,a=6:599, SB20, Callem

9550E ADS 9979B 43±5 G1 V 6.72 4.9 YD C,D opt.

619 +41°2695 83±7 dMOp 8.98 8.58 YD ...

9565 -1204542 48(S) dM0 10.9 9.3 OD ...

9584A HD 154906 440' F7 V 4.92J 3.1J YD T1702, a=5:210, v sin i=13

9584B HD 154905 44±7 F7 V 5.8 4.0 YD v sin 1-23

9584C ADS 10345C 44±7 ... 13 11 YD ABXC 13:2,175°

9587A(ab) HD 155125 51±7 A2 V 2.42J 1.OJ YD T,a-0.890,SB, AC 91:9, 142° opt.

9587B ADS 10374B 51±7 ... 3.5 2.0 YD T

9587D ADS 10374D 51±7 ... 12.34 10.9 YD AD 100",288°, B V=+0.83

659A HD 155674 50±7 dK8 8.85 7.34 YD AB 22':3,135°

659E ADS 10386B 50±7 dK8 9.34 7.84 YD ...

666A HD 156274 131±7 G8 V 5.48J 6.07J OD T,a=8:826, AC 42",279°, opt.?

666B LTT 6887 131±7 MO V 8.69 9.28 OD ...

669A Ross 868 99+-5 dM4e 11.36 11.25 YD AB 16"c.p.m. Also flares.

669B V639 Her 99±5 dMSe 12.92V-12.81V YD ...

672 NSV08553 72±5 G1 V 5.39 4.71 OD vin 1=0

675(ab) HD 58633 75±5 KO V 6.43 5.81 OD SB(28)

687(ab) +68 946 214±4 M4 V 9.15 10.80 OD astr.bin., posse SB(16)

't9599 HD 161284 41±12 KO 8.4 6.5 ... ...

695A HD 161797 128± 7 G5 IV 3.42 3.96 OD T,v sin 1-20, AB 34:0,247°

695B LTT 15267 128±7 dM4 9.78 10.32 OD a-1:360(BC),Callem

695C ADS 10786C 128±7 M4 10.7 11.2 OD ...

698(A) +18°3497 33±9 dK8 9.22 6.81 YD AB 18:70,287°

698(B) ... 33±9 ... 11.2 8.8 YD ...

699 Ba;nard 545±2 145 V 9.54 13.23 OD T4409

9609 +4 3562 40±6 dK5 9.5 7.5 YD Callem

9615A HD 165777 40t5 A4 V 3.73 1.7 YD AB 25:4,299°

9615B ADS 11076B 40±5 ... 14 12 YD ...

707 HD 166348 73±5 K7 V 8.39 7.71 YD Callem

9619 HD 168151 47±6 F5 V 5.04 3.4 YD ...

9628 Ross 713 40±8 K6 12P lop ... ...

720A NSV11090 68±±3 dM2 9.82 8.98 YD AB 112"

720B VB9 68±3 ... 14 13 YD ...

725A NSV11288A 284±3 dM4 8.90 11.17 YD T,AB 17",155°, flares: Ha abs.

725B HD 173740 284±3 dM5 9.69 11.96 YD BC 50" opt.

9651A +103942 46±6 MO 11.0P 9.3P ... AB 9.2,1800,Sp.Upgren

9651B Yale 4484.1(B)46±6 ... 11.5P 9.8P ... ...

9652A LTT 15634 42±6 K 13.OP 11.1P ... AB 45",1780

9652B LTT 15635 42±6 ... 14.4P 12.5P ... ...

9653A LTT 7658 104±10 M3 12.12 12.21 YD AB 27:2,3080

9653E WD 1917-077 104±10 DBZS 12.24 12.24 YD T(WD is not comp. A)
.TABLE 1-Continued

Gliese/ Other p+p.e. Spectral Age

WEPP Name ( 0:001) Type . V My Group Remarks

9658 HID 183650 4917 dG5 6.97 5.4 OD ...

765A HID 185395 56±9 F5 IV: 4.47 3.2 YD T,AB 4^2 , 530 AC-40.4 opt._

765B ADS 12695B 56± 9 ... 13.0 11 . 7 YD ...

766A Ross 165 905 dM4e . 12.7 12.6 ... AB 0:9, 2470

766B Yale 4646 ( B) 94± 5 ... 13.7 13 . 6 ... ...

9699(ab) HID 195987 51±5 G9 V 7.09 5.65 YD SB(29)

9705 Ross 766 40±7 dM3 11.5 9.5 OD ...

9707A( ab) H^ 197989 46*_8 KO III 2.46 0.8 YD T,SB,CaIIem, AB 54 °9,272° opt.

9707C LTT 16072 46±8 dM4 .. 13.4 11 . 7 YD AC 78: 1, 265°

830 HID 204587 61±7 MO V _ 9.10 8.0 OD ...

9747 Rog s 201 44±13 M4 = 16.3P 14.5P ... ...

849 -5 5715 112±5 dM3 10.42 10.67 YD ...

851 Ross 271 83±5 dM2 10 . 1 9.7 YD CaIIem

9779 ( ab) NSV 14132 42±5 AO V 3.85 2 . 0 YD SB , AB 37 :4,140° opt.

889 HID 218294 53(S) dMO 9.68 8.3 OD ...

9812A 1D 218641 40±10 G2 V 4 . 68J 2.7J YD AB 0.4,70

9812B HD 818640 40±10 A2 5.6 3.6 YD ...

894 -4g 16263 62±11 K5 10.3 9.3 ... ...

900 +0 5017 59±10 dM1 9.59 •8 . 4 YD CaIIem

9842 LTT 17032 50±12 M5 17 . 0 15.5P ... ...

909A( ab) HID 223778 93±4 K3 V 6.40 6.24 YD T,SB20, AB 4."6,95°

909E ADS 17062B 93±4 MO 11.8 11.6 YD ...

910 +28°4660 60±11 dMO 9 . 74 8.6 YD CalIem, AB'10" opt.
` -18-

TABLE 2

The IPC Detections

Gliese/ X-0 X-0 FX Lx

WEPP a (1950) ( s) a (1950) (") (ergs cm2s

-1 ) (ergs 9-1 ) Epoch

5 Oh 4m 2 85' +0.6

9052AB 1 16 6.2 -0.7

66A(ab)B 1 38 0.1 +5.1

86 2 08 29.6 -2.0

9087 2 34 12.2 +2.5

9124,5,7 3 41 21.5 +4.5

9124,5,7 3 41 22.3 +5.3

9124,5,7 3 41 21.0 +4.0

157B(ab) 3 54 58.6 +2.0

160 4 02 21.4 -1.0

9850 4 19 28.1 +9.8

172 4 33 41.0 +3.0

201 5 20 44.4 +0.8

9186 5 35 47.8 +0.9

233E 6 23 14.5 +0.8

234B 6 26 52.7 +0.2

250E 6 49 50.4 -0.5

311 8 34 44.6 -2.3

9276 8 42 36.6 -0.4

+280.44' 37" +0 (3.2*_0.4)-12

-1 `07 47 -3 (7.1±2.4)-14

-56 27 42 +49 (3.9±0.9)-;3

-51 04 14 +33 (2.4±0.8)--13

-3 21 49 +33 (3.7*-0.8)-13

+27 37 52 -42 (8.7±0.9)-13

+24 38 08 -26 (6.1±1.9)-13

+24 37 32 -62 (5.9*-1.0)-13

-1 18 26 +21 (1.2±0.2)-12

+21 52 21 -5 (1.5±0.1)-12

+19 23 35 +97 (1.1±0.5)-13

+52 46 07 +99 (1.4±0.5)-13

+17 17 13 +31 (2.0±1.1)-13

-28 43 03 -2 (7.00.4)-13

+18 47 06 -6 (5.9±0.3)-12

-2 46 27 +5 (2.0±0.1)-12

-5 06 17 +85 (6.4±1.0)-13

+65 12 06 +21 (3.0±0.3)-12

-42 27 51 +9 (1.4±0.4)-12

(8.1±1.0)+28

(4.0±1.4)+27

(2.1±0.5)+27

(3.7±1.2)+27

(2.3±0.5)+28

(4.9±0.5)+28

(3.5'-1.1)+28

(3.3±0.6)+28

(1.4±0.2)+28

(3.7±0.3)+28

(3.9±1.4)+27

(1.9±0.7)+27

(6.2±3.3)+27

(4.0±0.2)+28

(1.7±0.1)+29

(4.0±0.2)+27

(7.1±1.2)+27

(7.5±0.8)+28

(6.8±2.2)+28

79 Jun 27

80 Jul 13

79 Nov 21 3

80 Jur 3

80 Jul 11

81 Feb 7

i

81 Feb 8

81 Feb 8

I

80 Marl

81 Feb 1

i

81 Feb,

 10

80 Mai 12

i

79 Sep 10

79 Mar 28

80 Apr 1

80 Oct 11

80 Mar 22

79 Apr 29

80 May 31

1

- - _-
-19-

9278BCD 8 43 20.3 +1.2 -54 31 24 +8 (6.9±0.1)-13 (3.6±0.6)+28 79 Jul 19-

324B 8 49 36.9 +1.0 +28 30 26 +51 (5.5±1.4)-14 (1.2±0.3)+27 79 Oct 28

331BC 8 55 49.8 +3.1 +48 13 53 -24 (5.511.4)-13 (1.5±0.4)+28 79 Oct 30-

r

9298 9 24 20.2 -0.2 +39 42 40 -46 (3.9±0.7)-13 (2.6 ±0.5)+28: 79 Oct 19.

9316BC 10 05 31.4 -1.1 +12 13 57 +33 (3.0±0.9)-13 (2.1 ±0.7)+28 79 May 23. t

384AB 10 10 55.9 -0.6 -47 13 59 -16 (3.OtG6)-13 (8.2±1.8)+21 79 Dec 15 s

j

395(AC) 10 27 12.6 -12.8 +56 15 14 +57 (7.1 1.4)-13 (1.4±0.3)+28 80

1

May 24

417 11 09 49.2 -0.9 +36 , 05 38 +25 (5.011.0)-13 (3.4±0.6)+28: 79 May 2-.

i

450 11 48 31.5 +0.8 +35 - 33 44 +49 (2.4±0.6)-13 (1.8±0.4)+27 19 7.ec 12

9404 12 17 01.2 +6.6 +28 39 16 -17 (8.0±2.6)-14 (3.7±1.2)+27 80 Jun 27'

f

475(ab) 12 31 24.7 +4.6 +41 38 14 +23 (1.0±0.4)-13 (1.1±0.4)+27 79 Dec 8

l

490AB 12 55 19.1 +0.8 +35 29 48 +6 (1.00.2)-12 (7.3±1.3)+28 _ 78 Dec 13

490AB 12 55 17.4 -0.9 +35 29 50 +8 (1.2±0.04)-12 (6.0±0.2)+28 80 Jun 30

509AB 13 21 12.6 -0.4 +29 28 16 • -93 (1.4±0.5)-13 (5.6±2.1)+27 79 Dec 1:

516AB 13 30 19,9 +1.3 +17 04 10 +4 (2.1±0.7)-13 (7.6±2.5)+27 79

i

Dec 20

527E 13 44 52.9 +1.0 +17 42 18 -1 (2.310.2)-12 (8.6±0.7)+28 81 Jan 26

534(ab) 13 52 17.0 -0.9 +18 38 40 -3 (3.9±0.8)-13 (4.5±0.9)+27 81 Ja 11

549B 14 25 29.7 +0.5 +52 04 42 0 (6.7±0.2)-12 (1.7±0.05)+29 80 Jan 2 !

566AB 14 49 05.7 +0.4 +19 18 26 +5 (9.6±0.5)-12 (4.9±0.2)+28 80 Aug 11

567(ab) 14 51 07.0 +1.0 +19 21 47 +29 (2.0 ±0.3)-12 (3.5 ±0.5)+28 81

i.

Jan 24

584AB 15 21 09.8 .

+1.5 +30 27 51 -3 (2.6±0.6)-13 (8.411.9)+27 81 Jan 11

9537 15 59 07.3 -0.2 +33 24 47 -122 (2.810.7)-13 (1.910.5)+28 79 Aug 15

9537 15 59 06.7 +1.2 +33 24 32 -137 (4.4±1.0)-13 (3.0±0.7)+28 80 Jar, 20

9550B 16 12 48.3 +0.9 +33 59 08 +11 (4.310.1)-11 (2.810.1)+30 79 Jan 23

9550A(ab)B 16 12 48.8 +1.5 +33 59 01 +4 (2.0±0.3)-11 (1.3±0.2)+30 81 Jar. 10

9584BC 17 04 17.4 +0.7 +54 32 12 +4 (2.8±0.2)-12 (1.7±0.1)+29 79 Ju125 j)

9584ABC 17 04 17.8 +1.1 +54 32 25 +17 (2.0±0.2)-12 (1.2±0.1)+29 80 Mar12

V4 ;

}S

t`'i
-20-

17 04 10.0 -6.7 +54 32 21 +13 (2.310.2)-12 . (1.4±0.1)+29 80 Apt 8 '

17 09 13.1 +4.8 +54 32 53 -27 (1.910.7)-13- (9.313.5)+27 80 Mar 14

17 09 11.8 +3.5 +54 32 59 -21 (5.5±1.1)-13 (2.6±0.5)+28 80 Api 8

17 17 55.2 +1.7 +26 32 53 -7 (3.0±0.2)-12, (3.7±0.3)+28 79 Mar ^7

17 36 49.6 +9.6 +68 22 38 +10 (I.Ot0.3)-12. (2.7±0.7)+27 80 May 29

17 44 30.5 +3.2 +27 44 52 +32 (1.8±0.4)-13 (1.3±0.3)+27 79 Aug 27 i

17 53 34.1 +0.1 +18 30 07 -16 (2.9±0.9)-13 (3.2x1.0)+28 79 Oct 11

18 13 41.9 +4.3 +64 23 22 +33 (1.1±0.3)-12 (6.0±1.7)+28 80 May 25

18 42 10.6 +1.8 +59 34 47 +54 (3.9 ± 1.1)-13 (5.8 ± 1.7)+26 79 Nov 8

19 12 32.1 +4.4 +19 • 13 33 -56 (1.4±0.2)-12 (9.6±1.2)+28 81 Apr 10

19 35 06.4 +0.5 +50 06 24 -1 (8.0±1.5)-13' (3.1±0.6)+28 79 Oc t. 28

20 41 00.0 +2.2 +35 17 35 -85 (2.1±0.6)-13 (1.5±0.5)+28 80 Apr 30

22 06 59.0 -3.2 -04 54 26 -74 (2.1±0.5)-13 (2.0±0.5)+27 80 May 31

23 32 37.5 +0.8 +01 19 10 •-33 (1.210.2)-12 (4.0±0.7)+28 79 Dec 20

23 49 51.9 -7.7 +75 16 17 +21 (1.2±0.3)-12 (1.6±0.4)+28 80 Oct-12 4.-

23 49 50.9 -8.7 +75 16 42 +46 (1.6±0.4)-12 (2.2±0.5)+28 80 Oct 14

23 49 48.3 -11.3 +75 15 38 -18 (1.0±0.2)-12 (1.4±0.3)+28 81 Feb 1
-TABLE 3

The VC Upper Limits

(}liege/ Fx LX

WEPP (ergs cm-2a

-l )

(ergs s-1 ) Epoch

9006

9006

j 9006

! 28

I 33

35

38 I

I 9035

70

9067AB

9073AB

9074

9092AB

121

147

147

147

9126

9131

9131

9131

9131

9131

0.1-14 <4.2+27 80 Jan 1

0.6-14 <2.1+27 80 Jun 15

<5.3-14 0.1+27 81 Jan 2

<6.6-14 <1.5+27 79 Jan 23

<1.9-13 <1.1+27 79 Jun 27

<1.9-13 <4.2+26 81 Jan 5

<1.2-12 <4.7+28 79 Jul 12

<6.6-14 <4.9+27 80 Mar 20

<2.1-13 <2.0+27 79 Jul 23

<1.2-13 <7.6+27 80 Jul 13

<2.9-13 <2.2+28 80 Jan 18

<1.4-13 <7.8+27 80 Jul 26

<1.2-13 <7.6+27 80 Jul 14

<1.5-13 <5.3+27 80 Aug 12

<6.2-14 <2.0+27 79 Jan 27

<2.1-13 <6.8+27 79 Jul 29

,<1.8-13 <5.8+27 79 Aug 13

<1.1-13 <4.9+27 81 Feb 7

0.5-13 <7.8+27 80 Feb 16

<2.5-13 <1.3+28 81 Feb 7

<2.3-13 <1.2+28 81 Feb 7

0.4-13 <7.5+27 81 Feb 8

<2.2-13 <1.1+28 81 Feb 8
'a

01

.22.

9131 Q.3-13 <6.9+27 81 Feb8

19132 (1.8-13 (1.0+28 80 Feb 16 1 9132 (2.2-13 <1.3+28 81 Feb 8

19135 <1.6-!3 <1.0+28 81 Feb, 7 1 9137 <2.2-13 (9.2+27 80 Feb 19

91 is 0.1-13 G.3+28 80 Aug 11'

9849 0.2-13 (3.0+27 80 Feb 15

9849 C.5-13 0.8+27 81 Feb 10

9850 G.1-13 0.9+27 80 Feb 15 1

9157

( ab) 0.8-13 <7.9+27 79 Sep 10

^9157(ab) 0.3-13 <1.9+28 79 Sep 11

9157(ab) <6.5-14 <2.9+27 81 Jan 31

91 58

0.1-1

4 0.9+27 79 Mar

8

9158 0.9-14 <2.5+27 79 Aug 15

9158

0 .9-13 Q.2+28 79 Aug 15

19159B G.9-13 <9.3+27 80 Mar

2

180 G.7-13 0.0+27 79 Aug 17

9i, 7' 0.9-13 <2.9+28 80 Apr

8

209 G.3-13 0.3+27 80 Oct 12

9185 <5.4-13 0.727 80 Dec 12

19191 0-0-13 <1.6+28 79 Apr

8 ' 9191 0.6-13 <2.5+28 79 Apr 10

9191 <2.4-13 <1.3+28 80 Feb 11

9205 G.6-13 <1.0+78 80 Mar

9

9209AB

0.3-14

<5.0+27 79 Nov

6

263 G.0-13 0.5+27 79 Oct 29

263 U.0-13 <3.5+27 81 Apr 24
-23-

283B

'9248

'9265 1

9 269

9275AB

32 3A

346

363

9316D

9322

49324

'9357

427 I

42SAB

9394

9394

19404

i 461

464

471

;9418

9427

9441

513

9447

9447

52BAB

<8.9-14

<2.3-13

<9.6-14

<1.1-13

<9.0-13

<8.2-13

<6.3-13

<1.8-13

<1.1-13

<1.4-13

<3.0-13

<5.6-13

<1.3-13

<5.2-13

<9.2-14

<2.4-13

<2.2-13

<4.2-13

<1.1-12

<1.9-12

<7.0-13

<1.6-13

<2.0-13

<1.5-13

<2.2-13

<2.5-13

<2.2-13

<6.8+26

<8.6+27

<6.3+27:

<8.6+27

<4.5+28

<2.7+28

<2.7+28:

<4.3+27

<8.1+27

<9.4+27

<1.4+28

<2.3+28

<2.6+27

<7.7+27

<6.6+27

<1.7+28

<l.0+28

<1.4+28:

<5.4+28

<4.7+28

<5.2+28

<7.2+27:

<9.1+27

<5,9+27

<1.2+28

<1.4+28

<3.5+27

79 Oct 10

81 Mar 27

79 Apr 12

81 Apr 15

78 Dec 1S

79 Oct 22

79 May 24

SO Apr 30

79 May 23

79 Dec 7

80 May 13

79 Jun 20

79 May 23

79 Jul 13

79 Dec 

6

80 Jun 24

80 Jun 30

79 Jan 7

79 Jul 2

80 Jun 19

79 Apr 28

60 Jul 4

80 Jan 10

81 Jan 29

79 Jul 1

79 Aug 1

78 Dec 24
44-

534(ab) (5.4-13 (6.2+27 79 Jan 24

536 (2.0-13 (2.9+27 79 Jan 23

9468 (7.4-13 (5.6+28 79 Aug 26

547 (1.0-13 (3.3+27 80 Jul 11

548AB (3.7-13 ( 1.1+28 60 Jan 23

;9480 (2.1-13 (1.0+28 80 Jan 23'

561 (1.3-13 (5.6+27 80 Jan 21

9515 (3.8-13 (2.6+26: 79 Jul 22

, 9516 (2.0-13 <8.9+27 80 Aug 15

i

;9533

1

(2.4-13 (1.5+28 79 Jan 29

. 9533 (4.8-13 (3.0+28 79 Aug 15

9542(ab) Q.3-13 <5.4+27 79 Jan 29

<2.1 -13 <6.1+27 79 Jan 28

9549 <2.8-13 <8.1+27 80 Aug 15

9549 0.8-13 G.1+28 81 Jan 10

619 G.0-13 <1.8+27 79 Jul 30

9565 0.5-13 <1.8+28: 80 Aug 30

9587D 0.2-13 (5.7+27 79 Sep 22

6663 <8*1-14 <5.7+26 80 Oct 3

672 <8.6-14 <2.0+27 80 Aug 11

675(ab) <9.4-13 <2.0+28 80 May 25

675(ab) <5.8-13 G.2+28 80 May 27

687(ab) <6.4-13 G.7+27 80 May 26

9599 <6.1-13 <4.3+28 80 May 27

699 0.2-13 <1.3+26 110 Mar 23

699 0.8-13 <7.3+25 81 Apr 7

9609 <1.5-13 G.2+28 79 Sep 26

ZV- 7 ^ - 77
-25-

s

9609 <2.3-13 <1.7+28 79 Sep 26

i^9615AB 0.8-12 <1.4+29 80 Oct 8

i

707 <3.9-13 <8.7+27 80 Mar 9

i

;9628 <1.2-13 <9.0+27 80 Mar 21

I

9628 0.6-13 <1.2+28 80 Mar 23

720A <1.0-13 <2.7+27 79 Oct 8

720B 0.1-13 <2.9+27 79 Oct 8

9651AB <1.2-12 <6.6+28 80 Oct 8

,9653A <1.7-13 <1.8+27 79 Oct 22

9658 0.6-13 <7.9+27 79 Apr 11

766 <2.6-13 <3.5+27 79 Nov 20

9699(ab) <1.2-13 <5.5+27 78 Dec 17

9707C 0.3-13 <7.5+27 79 Nov 23

830 0. 3-13 <1 . 4+28 80 Jun 10

9747 <2 . 7-13 <1.7+28 80 Jul 8

851 <2 . 3-13 <4 . 0+27 80 Jun 15

9779(ab) <2.3-13 <1.6+28 79 May 20

889 <2.3-13 <9 . 8+27: 79 May 24

889 <5.1-13 <2.2+28: 79 May 25

9812AB <1.5-13 <1.1+28 79 May 24

9812AB 0.4- 13 <1.0+28 79 May 25

894 <2.6-13 <8.1+27 79 Nov 20

894 <2.2-13 <6.7+27 79 Nov 21

894 <2.0-13 <6.4+27 80 May 15

894 <2.2-13 <6.9+27 80 May 17

894 0.3-13 <3.9+21 80 Jun 6

9842 <9 . 0-14 <4 . 3+27 80 Jan 10

910 <2.8-13 <9.2+27 79 Jan 8
-26-

'. I

a

TABLE 2t

The HRI Dections .and Upper Limitsa

Gliese/ F Itc

WEPP (1950) X - 0 (1950) X - 0 (ergs cm28 -1 ) (ergs s-1 ) Epoch

216Ab 5h4222!04 +0'.04 -22027 , 5914 +0:3 (7.2+2.1)-13 (5.7+1.7)+27 80 ?gar 17

324E ... ... ... ... < 6.0 -1L 4 1.3 +27 80 May 12

9549 ... ... ... ... <3.6 -13 1.1 +28 79 Aug 24

695BC ... ... ... ... <6.0 -13 <4.4 +27 80 Oct 2

a Cfe jI regarding omission of G1 34AB, Gl 338AB, G1 570AB, and Gi 669AB.

b No IPC data.
`

-27-

TABLE 5

IPC Luminosity Function of 193 Untargeted Individual WEPP Stars

Number of Number of Redistributed Effective

L Detected Undetected Undetected Number

x

(ergs 9 -1 ) Stars Stars Stars of Stars

(2.56 - 5.12)+29 3 0 0 3

(1.28 - 2.56)+29 0 0 0 0

(6.4 - 12.8)+28 5 0 0 5

(3,.2 - 6.4)+28 11 7 0 11

(1.6 - :3.2)+28 11 7 1 12

( 8 - 16)+27 10 13 2 12

( 4 - 8)+27 12 28 7 19

( 2 - 4)+27 12 28 16 28

( 1 - 2)+27 7 19 22 29

( 5 - 10)+26 5 7 30 35

(2.5 - 5)+26 3 2 33 36

(1.25 - 2.5)+25 0 2 ... ...

(6.25 - 12 .5)+25 0 0 ... ...

(3.12 - 6. 2 5)+25 0 1 ... ...
-28-

. 1

., t

TABLE 6

IPC Luminosity Function of 126 Untargeted WEPP Systems

Number of Number of Redistributed Effective

& Detected Undetected Undetected N-anber

(ergs 9-1 ) Systeffe Systems Systems of Systems.

(1.02 - 2.05)+30 1 0 0 1

(5.12 - 10.2)+29 0 0 0 0

(2.56 - 5.12)+29 0 0 0 0

(1.28 - 2.56)+29 0 0 0 0

(6.4 - 12.8)+28 5 1 0 5

(3.2 - 6.4)+28 10 6 1 11

(1.6 - 3.2)+28 4 7 0 4

( 8 - 16)+27 4 12 1 5

( 4 - 8)+27 4 28 5 9

( 2 - 4)+27 6 22 22 28

( 1 - 2)+27 4 9 56 60

( 5 - 10)+26 0 1 ... ...

(2.5 - 5)+26 0 1 ... ...

(1. 25 - 2 .5)+26 0 0 ... ...

(6.25 - 12 .5) +2 5 0 0 ... ...

(3.12 - 6.25)+25 0 1 ... ... '
, •, •

-29- 

TABLE 7

IPC Luminosity Function off' 63 Untargeted WEPP M Dwarfs

Nur.ber of Redistributed Effective

Lx Number of Detected Stars Undetected Undetected Number

(ergs 3 -1 ) YD CD Tots 1 Stars Stars of Stars

(6.4 - 12.8)+29 1 0 1 0 0 1

(3.2 - 6.4)+28 4 • 0 4 3 0 4

(1.6 - 3.2)+28' 2 0 2 3 0 2

( 8 - 16)+27 0 1 1 7 1 2

( 4 - 8)+27 2 0 2 5 1 3

( 2 - 4)+27 4 3 7' 11 9 16

( 1 - 2)+27 1 1 2 6 6 8

( 5 - 10)+26 1 0 1 2 5 6

(2 .5 - 5) +26 1 2 3 0 15 18

(1.25 - 2. 5)+26 0 0 0 2 ... ...

(6. 25 - 12 .5) +25 0 0 0 0 ... ...

(3.12 - 6.25)+25 0 0 0 1 ... ...
REFERENCES

Avni, Y., Soltan, A., Tananbauin, H., and Zamorani, G. 1980, Ap.J.,

38, 800-.

Cash, W., Charles, P., and Johnson, H. M. 1980, Ap.J.(Letters), 239 9 L23.

Eggen, 0. J. 1969, Pub^.A.S.P_., 81, 553.

Gliese, W. 1969 9 Catalog of Nearby Stars (1969 ed.; Heidelberg:

Vertlff. Astr. Rechen-Inst.), No. 22.

------ 1981, Bull. Inf. CDS, No. 20.

Gliese, W., and Jahreiss, H. 1979, Astr. AD. Suppl., _ 38, 423.

Harris, D. E:, and Irwin, D. 1984, Einstein Observatory Revised Users,

Manual (Cambridge: Center for Astrophysics).

Harris, D. E., and Johnson, H. M. 1985 9 Ap.J., 294, 649.

Hoffleit, D., and Jaschek, C. 1982, The Bright Star Catalogue, 4th ed.

(New Haven: Yale University Obs.).

Johnson, H. M. 1983, Ap.J., 273 9 702.

------ 1984, Bull. A.A.S., 16, 472.

Kahn, S. M., Wesemal, F., Liebert, J., Raymond, J. C., Steiner, J. E.,

and Shipman, H. L. 1984, Ap.J., 278, 255.

McCook, G. P., and Sion, E. M. 1984, A Catalogue of Spectroscopically

Identified White Dwarfs, 2nd ed. (Villanova: Villanova Press).

Raymond, J. C, ., and Smith, B. W. 1979, private communication.

Seward, F. D., and Macdonald, A. 1993, Einstein (M40-2) Observing

Catalog; 4th ed., CFA/rz.A 83-039.

Swank, J. H. ! and Johnson, H. M. 1992, Ap.J.(Let. t. ers), 259, L67.

van Altena, W. F. 1585, private communication.

Woolley, R., Epps, E. A., Penston, N. J., and Pocock, S. B, 1970,

Royal Obs. Ann., No. 5 (WEPP).

-• .+
• *• t -31-

Hugh M. Johnson: Department 91-20, Building 255, Lockheed Missiles

and Space Company, 3170 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304