alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1The defendant complied with FED. R. CRIM. PRO. 29(c) to preserve

error on this point.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40084

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS H. RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(C-97-CR-206-1)

December 2, 1998

Before JOHNSON, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesus Rodriguez appeals his conviction for aiding and abetting the

possession with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with

intent to distribute marijuana. Rodriguez argues that the evidence is

insufficient to support the jury’s verdict.1 Specifically, Rodriguez

contends that (1) the government did not link him to marijuana found in

a truck driven by his stepson, Ernesto Garcia (“Garcia”), and (2) he did
2

not knowingly possess marijuana found in a disabled truck in his yard.

In reviewing a claim of legal insufficiency, this Court must

determine whether “a rational trier of fact could have found that the

evidence establishes the essential elements of the offense beyond a

reasonable doubt.” United States v. El-Zoubi, 993 F.2d 442, 445 (5th

Cir. 1993) (citations omitted). The evidence will be considered in the

light most favorable to the government. See Glasser v. United States,

315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942); United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1551

(5th Cir. 1994). 

In this case, we find that the evidence was sufficient to support

a reasonable juror’s finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt on all

of the essential elements of the charged offenses. A rational trier of

fact could have found Rodriguez guilty of aiding and abetting the

possession with the intent to distribute marijuana because he provided

the vehicle and accompanied Garcia on the marijuana transportation trip.

See United States v. Jaramillo, 42 F.3d 920, 923 (5th Cir. 1995).

Further, the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict on the

charge of possession with intent to distribute because a reasonable jury

could have found that Rodriguez owned the property from which the

marijuana was confiscated. Based on his ownership of the property,

Rodriguez may be deemed to have possessed the marijuana. See United

States v. Brito, 136 F.3d 397, 411 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct.

1817 (1998); United States v. Jones, 133 F.3d 358, 362 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 1854 (1998). Intent to distribute can be
3

inferred from the large amounts of marijuana found in the trucks. See

Brito, 136 F.3d at 411; United States v. Williams-Hentricks, 805 F.2d

496, 502 (5th Cir. 1986). 

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Joseph E. Katona, III, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Starcraft Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC ReleaseNos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; 

 

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

 

d) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls. 

 

Signed this 16th day of December, 2004
#### Marvin Lee HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-208.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 5, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Small Cap Index VIP, a series of DWS Investments VIT Funds, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| August 20, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark                                            |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|            | Michael G. Clark                                               |
|            | President                                                      |
|            | DWS Small Cap Index VIP, a series of DWS Investments VIT Funds |

 

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John Farahi, Chief Executive Officer of Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.               The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /S/ JOHN FARAHI           |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| John   Farahi             |   |
| Chief   Executive Officer |   |
| March 15,   2011     |   |

 

----
**Exhibit      32.1**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 10, 2007 |                                   |   |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                              |                                   |   |
|                              | /s/                SAL PERISANO        |   |
|                              | Sal                Perisano            |   |
|                              | Chief                Executive Officer |   |
# L_2005019EN.01004701.xml

| 21.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 19/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 19/47

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 98/2005

of 20 January 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the import of sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2275/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003, on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction from third countries in the duty on sorghum imported into Spain was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2275/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction from third countries in the duty on sorghum imported into Spain was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2275/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 14 to 20 January 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2275/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 January 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 396, 31.12.2004, p. 32.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1192. IN THE INTEREST OF L. A. D. H., A CHILD (FATHER).

The juvenile court terminated the parental rights of the mother, legal father,

and putative father of L. A. D. H. The putative father filed a motion for new trial,

which the juvenile court denied. The putative father then filed a notice of appeal,

resulting in the docketing of this direct appeal. He also filed an application for

discretionary appeal, which this Court granted. See Case No. A24D0263 (Mar. 21,

2024). Thereafter, the putative father filed a second notice of appeal, resulting in the

docketing of a second direct appeal — Case No. A24A1268.1 Because the putative

father’s two pending direct appeals are identical, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED

as superfluous.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 The mother also filed a motion for new trial, which the juvenile court denied,

and an application for discretionary appeal, which we granted. See Case No.

A24D0262 (Mar. 21, 2024). Her direct appeal has been docketed as Case No.

A24A1232.

May 06, 2024

05/06/2024
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58735-58736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28829]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Activities or To 
Acquire Companies That are Engaged in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 97-27898) published on pages 
54850 and 54851 of the issue for Wednesday, October 22, 1997.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis heading, the entry for 
Area Bancshares Corporation, Ownesboro, Kentucky, is revised to read as 
follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. Area Bancshares Corporation, Owensboro, Kentucky; to acquire a 
company and thereby engage in developing and providing data processing 
and data transmission services to financial institutions for use in 
providing products and services over the Internet, pursuant to Sec.  
225.28(b)(14) of the Board's Regulation Y.
    Comments on this application must be received by November 5, 1997.

[[Page 58736]]

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 27, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-28829 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

38 39 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/29 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
254 La. 833

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Isaac PEART v. H. J. DEES, Acting Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50187.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 7, 1969.

In re: Isaac Peart applying for writ of habeas corpus and mandamus.

The application is denied. According to the return of the trial judge, the matter complained of is now moot.
Exhibit
      32.2


**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Bio Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      March 10, 2007


By:
            /s/
                David KoosDavid
                KoosActing
                Chief Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
      adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
      of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Frezer,
      Inc. and will be retained by Frezer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DEON C. STAFFORD, SR., :

:

Plaintiff :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-13-2026

:

JOHN WETZEL, ET AL., : (Judge Brann)

:

Defendants :

ORDER

February 5, 2015

In accordance with the accompanying memorandum, , IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss less than all the claims raised in

the Amended Complaint (Doc. 25) is PARTIALLY

GRANTED.

2. Dismissal is GRANTED in favor of Original Defendant SCIDallas Deputy Superintendent Lawrence Mahally and with

respect to the damage claims against the Defendants in their

official capacities. 

1

Case 4:13-cv-02026-MWB-JVW Document 31 Filed 02/05/15 Page 1 of 2
3. Plaintiff’s claims of unconstitutional denial of access to the

court and verbal harassment are DISMISSED with the

exception of the allegations that those actions were part of

retaliatory mistreatment by the Remaining Defendants.

4. Dismissal is also GRANTED with respect to the allegations of

due process and equal protection violations.

5. Plaintiff’s claims of retaliatory mistreatment which included

cell searches, cell transfers, verbal abuse and confiscation of

legal materials will proceed.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

2

Case 4:13-cv-02026-MWB-JVW Document 31 Filed 02/05/15 Page 2 of 2
#### Gerald KILPATRICK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 44347.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 8, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
July 26, 2004 

Refer to: HSA­10/LS­57 

Mr. Robert Sik 

Vice President 

Akron Foundry Company 

2728 Wingate Avenue 

P.O. Box 27028 

Akron, Ohio 44319­0009 

Dear Mr. Sik: 

Thank you for your letter dated March 24 requesting Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

acceptance of a modification to your company’s TB1­17 breakaway cast aluminum transformer 

base for use on the National Highway System under the provisions of National Cooperative 

Highway Research Program Report 350 “Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance

Evaluation of Highway Features.” 

You requested that we find the TB1­17 base acceptable when used on a 13­1⁄2 inch bolt circle with 

a modified stack pack washer arrangement. This change is requested to accommodate the State of

Nebraska in order to retrofit existing poles (currently installed on failing frangible couplings)

mounted on 13 1⁄2 inch bolt circles. We have reviewed the results of prior crash testing of the TB1­17 bases, which had been found 

acceptable when used with standard round washers on bolt circles ranging from 13 inches to 15 

inches, and concur that this minor modification would have no significant impact on the 

breakaway performance of your company’s transformer bases. All appropriate conditions in the 

previous FHWA acceptance letters dealing with Akron Foundry cast aluminum transformer bases

continue to apply.

Sincerely yours,

/Original Signed by/ 

John R. Baxter, P.E. Director, Office of Safety Design 

Office of Safety
255 La. 500

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph Faye KING, Rhonda Earline Williams, et al.

No. 50410.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1970.

In re: Joseph Faye King and Rhonda .Earline Williams applying for remedial writs.

Writs refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The holding in this case has the effect of making that provision of C.Cr.P. 292 which gives an absolute right to a preliminary examination when applied for before the filing of a bill of information, null and of no effect. The after filing of the bill is hereby held to make such a hearing discretionary, and is in my opinion contrary to law and legislative intent.