alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SOUND
SOURCE INTERACTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 1998 THROUGH
JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         857,143
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  591,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (15,872)
<INVENTORY>                                    329,368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,268,208
<PP&E>                                         716,106
<DEPRECIATION>                               (470,832)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,530,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,091,572
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,869
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,869,697)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,530,244
<SALES>                                      4,556,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,624,540
<CGS>                                        3,175,637
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,362,496
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,757
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,976,030)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,977,630)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,977,630
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)


</TABLE>
#### Rorabaugh’s Estate.

*Practice, orphans’ court*— Findings *of fact*— Decedents’ *estates*— Prom*issory note*— Forgery.

A finding of fact by the judge of the orphans’ court that a promissory note presented as a claim against a decedent’s estate is a forgery will not be reversed by the Supreme Court if there is sufficient testimony to sustain it.

Argued Oct. 5, 1910.

Appeal, No. 149, Oct. T., 1910, by Margaret Rorabaugh, from decree of O. C. Westmoreland Co., Feb. T., 1910, No. 59, disallowing claim against estate of David Rorabaugh.

Before Fell, C. J., Beown, Mssteezat, Pottee, Elkin, Stewaet and Moschziskee, JJ.

Affirmed.

Exceptions to adjudication. Before Steel, P. J.

*378January 3, 1911:

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

*Error assigned*was decree disallowing claim and dismissing exceptions to adjudication.

*Chas. C. Crowell,*for appellant.

*John E. Kunkle,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order disallowing a claim by a widow against her husband’s estate. His whole estate, real and personal, was less than $3,000. The appellant, who was his third wife, presented a note for $2,000, drawn to her order and dated within a month of her marriage to him. Her claim was resisted by his children by a former marriage, on the ground that the note was a forgery. The learned judge of the orphans’ court concluded from, an inspection of the note, and from the testimony of witnesses familiar with the handwriting of the decedent, that the note was not genuine.

There was ample testimony, which if believed, would sustain the conclusion reached. This is the limit of our inquiry. We have repeatedly said that we will not review findings of fact except to ascertain whether there was testimony to sustain them: Hancock v. Melloy, 187 Pa. 371; Dilworth v. Kennedy, 201 Pa. 388.

The decree of the court is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.
#### Ricky J. PARSONS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43962.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 6, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 276 So.2d 852.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, Mc-CAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
#### Robert L. CROWDER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. Roy C. BAKER, Respondent.

No. 44680.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 21, 1974.

ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., dissents.
#### Richard S. LUBBEN, d/b/a Richard S. Lubben and Sons, Appellant, v. Margaret SEMENEK, Matthew A. Colletti and Dolores M. Colletti, Appellees.

No. 77-2728.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 31, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 1978.

A. Matthew Miller of Miller & Schwartz, P. A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Richard A. Rosenberg, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Margaret Semenek.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record this court is of the opinion that the trial court abused his discretion in vacating the default judgment. *Westinghouse Credit Corporation v. Steven Lake Masonry, Inc.,*356 So.2d 1329, Fla. 4th DCA, opinion filed April 4, 1978; *In re Aston,*245 So.2d 674 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Accordingly, the order vacating the default judgment is hereby reversed.

REVERSED.

ANSTEAD, DAUKSCH and MOORE, JJ., concur.
No. 9903.

#### The Dayton & Troy Electric Railway Co. *v.*Burner.

(Decided January 15, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Miami County.

*Messrs. McMahon & McMahon; Mr. A. F. Broomhall*and *Mr. E. FI. Kerr,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. H. F. MacCracken*and *Messrs. Long & Kyle,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 10, 2018

No. 04-18-00214-CV

MISSION RIDGE P.U.D. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Robyn M. HINES,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI11100

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The record was due May 9, 2018, but it was not filed. The clerk and court reporter have 

each filed a notification of late record stating the record has not been filed because appellant has 

not paid or made arrangements to pay the fees to prepare the record and appellant is not entitled 

to the record without paying the fee. 

We order appellant Mission Ridge P.U.D. Homeowners Association to provide written 

proof to this court by May 21, 2018 that the clerk’s fee and the reporter’s fee have been paid or 

that arrangements satisfactory to the clerk and reporter have been made to pay the fees. If 

appellant fails to file such proof with respect to the clerk’s record within the time provided, this 

appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). If timely proof is 

filed regarding payment for the clerk’s record, but not as to the reporter’s record, appellant’s 

brief will be due June 11, 2018, and the court will consider only those issues or points raised in 

appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

37.3(c). 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of May, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
```

[House Report 111-674]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     111-674

======================================================================

 
   WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO 
  CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON 
 RULES, AND PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES

                                _______
                                

  December 7, 2010.--Referred to the House Calender and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

                Mr. Polis, from the Committee on Rules, 
                        submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                      [To accompany H. Res. 1752]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 1752, by a record vote of 6 to 3, report the 
same to the House with the recommendation that the resolution 
be adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The resolution applies the 
waiver to any resolution reported through the legislative day 
of December 18, 2010. Finally, the resolution authorizes the 
Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules 
at any time through the legislative day of December 18, 2010. 
The Speaker or her designee shall consult with the Minority 
Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter for 
consideration pursuant to this resolution.

                            COMMITTEE VOTES

    The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion 
to report, together with the names of those voting for and 
against, are printed below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 507

    Date: December 7, 2010.
    Measure: H. Res. 1752--Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) 
of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain 
resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules, and providing 
for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.
    Motion by: Mr. McGovern.
    Summary of motion: To report the rule.
    Results: Adopted 6-3.
    Vote by Members: McGovern--Yea; Hastings (FL)--Yea; 
Matsui--Yea; Pingree--Yea; Polis--Yea; Dreier--Nay; Diaz-
Balart, L.--Nay; Foxx--Nay; Slaughter--Yea.

                                  

```
Order filed August 23 , 2022

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 22

- 00 4 82

- CV

____________ GERVAIS EDMONDS

- WIGGINS , Appellant

V.

JONATHAN WARREN WIGGINS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 507 th Dist rict Court

Harris County, Texas T rial Court Ca use No. 2021

- 35056



### ORDER The notice of appeal in this case was filed June 30 , 2022. To date, the appellate filing fee of $ 20 5.00 has not been paid by appellant

. Moreover, t he clerk responsible for prepar ing the record notified this court tha t appellant ha s not made

pa yment for the record. No evidence that appellant ha s established i ndigence has
been filed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 5, 145. On Ju ly 12 , 2022, this court notified appellant that the appeal was subj ect to dismissal without further notic e unless he paid the appell ate filing fee, and o n August 2 , 2022, this court notified appellant2

that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless appellant made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of

p ayment for the record. No respo nse was filed to eith er notice . Therefore, the court
issue s the following order.
Appellant i s ordered to demonstrate to this court within ten (10) days of the
date of this order arrangements have been made to pay for the cler k’s record. See
Tex. R. App. P . 35.3(c). Appella nt is further ordered to pay the appellate filing fee in the amount of $205 .00 to the Clerk of this court within ten (10) days of the date
of this order

. If appellant fail s t o timely comply with either of those orders , the appeal will b e subject to dism issal without further notice for want of prosecution.
See Tex

. R. App. P. 37.3(b) , 42.3(b)

.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Spain, Poi ssant, and Wilson.
@ Eastern Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle

i i ling, VA 20166-6511
US.Department Highway Division Sterling, 0166-65
of Transportation

Federal Highway
Administration

SENT VIA ELECTRONIC CORRESPONDENCE

MAY -8 2013 In Reply Refer to: HFPP-15

Mr. Charles A. Zelle

Commissioner

Minnesota Department of Transportation
395 John Ireland Blvd.

Mailstop 100

St. Paul, MN 55155-1899

Subject: _ MAP-21 Access Program Programming Decisions Committee Members
Dear Mr. Zelle:

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21“ Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141,
includes the establishment of the new Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP). This new
program will be administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Federal
Lands Highway. Minnesota is served by the Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD)
office in Sterling, Virginia.

A key requirement for implementing the FLAP is to coordinate the establishment of a three
member Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for programming the FLAP
funds allocated to each state. Each state level PDC consists of a representative from the Federal
Lands Highway Division office, the State Department of Transportation, and an organization or
entity that is suited to represent the local entities responsible for building, operating, or
maintaining transportation facilities that are located on, are adjacent to, or provide access to
Federal lands. Our program managers have coordinated with your department and have
identified the following positions that will fulfill the PDC requirement:

FLAP Program Manager, FHWA, EFLHD
State Aid Engineer, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Member, Minnesota County Engineers’ Association


Additional information on the implementation of FLAP can be found on the EFLHD MAP-21
website at http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/federal-lands-access.aspx. If you have any
questions, please contact Mr. David Payne at 571-434-1543 or David.Payne@dot.gov, or myself
at 703-404-6276 or Karen.Schmidt@dot.gov.

Sincerely yours,

KA BAR

S&S Karen A. Schmidt
Director, Office of Program Administration

ce:
Mr. Seth Greenwood, Member, Minnesota County Engineers’ Association, St. Peter, MN

Ms. Julie Skallman, State Aid Engineer, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN
Mr. Derrell E. Turner, Division Administrator, FHWA, Minnesota Division Office, St. Paul, MN
# L_2005146EN.01001101.xml

| 10.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 146/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 146/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 877/2005

of 9 June 2005

suspending the buying-in of butter in certain Member States

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 of 16 December 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards intervention on the market in butter and cream (2), and in particular Article 2 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 lays down that buying-in is to be opened or suspended by the Commission in a Member State, as appropriate, once it is observed that, for two weeks in succession, the market price in that Member State is below or equal to or above 92 % of the intervention price. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 lays down that buying-in is to be opened or suspended by the Commission in a Member State, as appropriate, once it is observed that, for two weeks in succession, the market price in that Member State is below or equal to or above 92 % of the intervention price.

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 706/2005 (3) establishes the most recent list of Member States in which intervention is suspended. This list must be adjusted as a result of the market prices communicated by Sweden pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999. In the interests of clarity, the list in question should be replaced and Regulation (EC) No 706/2005 should be repealed, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 706/2005 (3) establishes the most recent list of Member States in which intervention is suspended. This list must be adjusted as a result of the market prices communicated by Sweden pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999. In the interests of clarity, the list in question should be replaced and Regulation (EC) No 706/2005 should be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Buying-in of butter as provided for in Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 is hereby suspended in Belgium, Denmark, Cyprus, Hungary, Malta, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Slovenia, Sweden and Finland.

Article 2

Regulation (EC) No 706/2005 is hereby repealed.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 118, 5.5.2005, p. 25.

3

---
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-04760 |
|------------------------------------|-----------|

 

DWS Advisor Funds

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 09/30 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 09/30/08 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

 

----
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Robert SHEVIN, Petitioner, v. Alfonso C. SEPE, etc., Respondent.

No. 43207.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 19, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 269 So.2d 786.

CARLTON, ROBERTS, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
#### L. C. SHULER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-228.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Sept. 23, 1969.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and John D. Buchanan, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James Robert Yon, Asst. Atty. Gen. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Jalbert v. State (Fla.1957), 95 So.2d 589; Tavalaccio v. State (Fla.1952), 59 So.2d 247.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

**Waterfowl Identification in the Central Flyway**

##       Puddle or Dabbling Duck Characteristics    

----

****

----

Previous Section
Return to Contents
Next Section

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/waterfwl/puddle.htm		Page Contact Information: Webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 03-Aug-2006 11:32:16 EDT		Reston, VA [vaww54]
No. 9908.

#### Challen *v.*Martin et al.

(Decided January 29, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Wood County.

*Mr. Edward Beverstock,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Franklin F. Riegle*and *Mr. James 0. Troup,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
# L_2005058EN.01001401.xml

| 4.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 58/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 58/14

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 369/2005

of 3 March 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004 of 3 September 2004 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden for the 2004/2005 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 25 February to 3 March 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 3 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 3.

3

---