alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-100165, 333-54392 and333-108444) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-97893, 333-47596, 333-03465, and 333-61611) of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. of our report dated October 13, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K/A. 

 

/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

October 14, 2005
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 3.3




                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                      OF

              AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                      OF

                               METROCALL, INC.


        Metrocall, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

        FIRST.  That the Board of Directors of said Corporation duly adopted
the following amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation which amends Article 4.1. thereof to read in its entirety as
follows:

        4.  CAPITAL STOCK.

              4.1 Authorized Shares.

        The total number of shares of all classes of stock that the Corporation
shall have the authority to issue is 34,500,000 shares, of which 1,000,000
shares shall be Preferred Stock, having a par value of $0.01 per share (the
"Preferred Stock"), and 33,500,000 shall be classified as shares of Common
Stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Common Stock").  The Board of Directors is
expressly authorized to provide for the classification and reclassification of
any unissued shares of Preferred Stock or Common Stock and the issuance
thereof in one or more classes or series without the approval of the
stockholders of the Corporation.

        SECOND.  That the said amendment has been consented to and authorized
by the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding stock entitled to
vote in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

<PAGE>   2
        THIRD.  That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance
with the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its Vice President and attested by its Assistant Secretary, this 11th
day of November 1996.

                                        /s/ VINCENT D. KELLY
                                        -----------------------------
                                      Vincent D. Kelly, Vice President

                                        /s/ SHIRLEY B. WHITE
                                        ------------------------------
Attested by:                          Shirley B. White Assistant Secretary


[SEAL]
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4300-N-01]


The Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban 
Development.

ACTION: Notice of appointments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Housing and Urban Development announces the 
appointments of Willie H. Gilmore, Maxine F. Griffith, Joseph F. Smith, 
and George L. Weidenfeller as members, and George S. Anderson as an 
alternate member to the Departmental Performance Review Board. The 
address is: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, 
D.C. 20410.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Persons desiring any further 
information about the Performance Review Board and its members may 
contact Earnestine Pruitt, Director, Executive Personnel Management 
Division, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, D.C. 
20410, telephone (202) 708-1381. (This is not a toll-free number.)

    Dated: October 28, 1997.
Andrew M. Cuomo,
Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development.
[FR Doc. 97-28936 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-32-M
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of RedCell Power Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.the report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: October 18, 2006  /s/ Michael LaidlawMichael LaidlawPresident and Chief Executive Officer
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com]

Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:01 PM

To: tballo@earthjustice.org; ScottB@lvmetals. com; Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; gbf1@pge.com; adelaski@standardsasap.org; rroy@nrdc.org; sn adel@aceee.org; eduardorobles@eaton.com;rgreeson@federalpacific.com; vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; chad.kennedy@us.schneiderelectric.com; john.caskey@nema.org; dave.millu re@metglas.com; john.cy mbalsky@ee.doe.gov; mark.e.stoering@xcelenergy.com; mwaltner @nrdc.org; carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; thomas.patzner@us.schneider-electric.com; paul.ryan@hitmet.com; Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; Robert Berman; Phil Hopkinson; Caitlin Johnson; Freeman, Je remiah (CONTR); Michael Rivest; Brian Coffey;
Zhimei Luo; Chris Bolduc Subject: Re: Roster of LV Committee Members

Colleagues,

Please look over the attached cont act sheet previously distributed to make sure that our information for you is correct. Any additions , deletions, changes should be brought to the attention of Caitlin Johnson, caitlin.johnson@navigant.com , who is maintaining the master list.

Thanks.

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Richard Parker < richardparkerdc@gmail.com > wrote: Dear Colleagues,

Attached is a list of select ed members and alternates for the Low-Voltage Transformer Negotiating Work Group. Like its Medium Voltage counterpart, it's a dist inguished and broadly representative group chosen from nominations received in response to last month's Federal Register call for nominations. Though only comm ittee members sit at the table and vote, all representatives, advocates and members of the p ublic are welcome to attend our meetings and to speak.

The first meeting of the Low-Voltage (LV) Comm ittee will be Sept. 28 in Washington, DC, from 9 am - 5 pm. Details to follow.

I look forward to working with you.

All best,

Richard Parker

Convenor and Facilitator
The Federal Lands Transportation Program (FLT

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act under the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation A

improve transportation facilities for the following FeAgency (FLMA) partners:  National Park Service (NPS)  Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)  USDA Forest Service (USFS)  Bureau of Land Management (BLM)  US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)  Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), and  Independent Federal Agencies with natural resou

responsibilities (IFAs). 

The Federal share is 100%. Funds made available unthe current year plus three additional years. 

Federal Lands Transportation Pro

Funding Distribution: By statute the NPS, FWS, and USFS receive ann Based on application submissions from the BLM

IFA’s, allocation amounts are determined by the Transportation by use of a performance managem

FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 

NPS $268M $276M $284M $29

FWS $30M $30M $30M $3

USFS $15M $16M $17M $1

BLM, 

USACE, 

BOR, and 

IFAs

$22M $23M $24M $2

Total $335M $345M $355M $36
For more information, please visit: http://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/

For Program Guidance: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/guidance.cfm 

If y

Eligibility 23 USC §203(a) establishes FLTP funding for:  Program administration, transportation 

planning, research, preventive maintenance, engineering, rehabilitation, restoration, construction, and reconstruction of Federal Lands Transportation Facilities. 

 Capital, operations, and maintenance of 

transit facilities. 

 Transportation projects, eligible under Title 

23, that are on the public network that provides access to, adjacent to, or through Federal lands. 

 Up to $10,000,000 per Fiscal Year for 

environmental mitigation activities. 

 Funds may be used to pay the non-Federal 

share for any project funded under 23 USC or chapter 53 of 49 USC that provides access to or within Federal or tribal lands. 

Performance Management Model The central theme of the Program is performance management. All FLMAs must provide an investment strategy that identifies, describes, and assesses the baseline conditions of their transportation networks. The application should address:  System Definition  State of Good Repair  Reduction of Bridge Deficiencies  Improvement of Safety  Resource and Asset Management Goals Accomplishment Report At fiscal year end, each FLMA partner must submit an accomplishment report tied to goals achieved with FLTP funding received within the year.

Transportation Planning Planning is essential to the success of the Program. The planning process examines short and long term investment goals and strategies while setting performance management goals and expectations. Data collection and analysis, essential to the planning process, aid in the effort to make informed decisions in situations where competing priorities are a reality.
U.S. Department 

Of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration

400 Seventh St., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

February 11, 1992 

Refer to: HNG-14/SS-26 

Mr. Herbert J. Henry 

Telespar Product Manager 

Unistrut Corporation 

35660 Clinton Street 

Wayne, Michigan 48184 

Dear Mr. Henry: 

Thank you for your letter of January 23 requesting Federal Highway Administration’s 

(FHWA) acceptance of a modification to your company’s perforated square steel tube 

breakaway small sign supports. Our letter of March 31, 1989, accepted a range of 

Telespar post sizes for use on Federal-aid highway projects. All of the supports consisted 

of a base post projecting 100 mm (4 inches) or less above the ground into which was 

inserted the signpost. Some of the assemblies included a sleeve around the base post, 

which is intended to reduce damage to the base post in the even of a knockdown. 

The modification you desire is to omit the sleeve from those post assemblies that called 

for one. The reason for this change is to reduce initial installation cost for these small 

sign supports. We agree with your argument that the use of the sleeve would reinforce 

the base post which could result in favorable life-cycle costs for these sign supports. 

However, based upon our review or prior crash testing of square steel tube sign supports, 

we believe that omission of the sleeve will not significantly affect the breakaway 

performance of these sign support systems. Therefore, Telespar post sizes 22F12, 

20F12, 16F12, and 14F12 are acceptable for use on Federal-aid highway projects with or 

without the “sleeve” around the base post if requested by a State. All other conditions in 

our previous letter remain in effect. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 L.A. Staron, Chief 

 Federal-Aid and Design Division 

Geometric and Roadside Design Acceptance SS-26
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SEC. 1350 AS ADOPTED**




**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
      Daniels, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
                June 20, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Mark DanielsMark
              DanielsChief
              Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1997

MARGARITA DEL CARMEN TORRES

- MEJIA; G.Y.R.T , Petitioners ,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of a n Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : March 24, 2020 Decided: April 15, 2020

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
David C. Drake, DRAKE IMMIGRATION LAW, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director, Lindsay Corliss, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT O F JUSTICE , Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Margarita Del Carmen Torres

- Mejia and her minor child, native s and citizen s of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of th e Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying Torres

- Mejia’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have considered Torres

- Meji a’s claims after thoroughly reviewing
the record and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (201 8 ), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decisi on, see INS v. Elias

- Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992)

. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons state d by the Board.
See In re Torres

- Mejia (B.I.A. Aug. 15, 2019 ). We deny the motion for summary disposition as moot and dispense wi th oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
# L_2005177EN.01003101.xml

| 9.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 177/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 177/31

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1086/2005

of 8 July 2005

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

| (2) | Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 at 11 500 t. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 at 11 500 t.

| (3) | It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 July 2005 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2.   Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of August 2005 for 1 862,167 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).

2

---
#### Fred BERGER, d/b/a Fred Berger Realty and Harry Waldman, Appellants, v. G & S FOOD MARKET, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-58.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 9, 1971.

James H. Seay, of Crabtree, Butler, Brush, Syprett & Meshad, Sarasota, for appellants.

Daniel Scarritt, of Icard, Merrill, Cullis & Timm, Sarasota, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It undisputedly appears that the notice of appeal here was filed two days late. We are, therefore, without jurisdiction of this appeal. The same must be, and it is hereby, dismissed *ex mero motu.*See, Ramagli Realty Co. v. Craver (Fla.1960), 121 So.2d 648 and Robberson v. Jefferson (Fla.App.1968), 207 So.2d 467.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28096]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Intelligence Agency, Science and Technology Advisory 
Board Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of 
Pub. L. 92-463, as amended by Section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice is 
hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Scientific Advisory Board 
has been scheduled as follows:

    Dates: November 4-5, 1997 (8 a.m. to 5 p.m.).
    Addresses: The Defense Intelligence Agency, Bolling AFB, 
Washington, D.C. 20340-5100.
    For Further Information Contact: Maj Michael W. Lamb, USAF, 
Executive Secretary, DIA Science and Technology Advisory Board, 
Washington, D.C. 20340-1328 (202) 231-4930.
    Supplementary Information: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in Section 
552b(c)(I), Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed to 
the public. The Board will receive briefings on and discuss several 
current critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, 
on related scientific and technical matters.

    Dated: October 16, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-28096 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
No. 9484.

#### Zurhorst *v.*Judson.

(Decided January 29, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Erie County.

*Mr. H. C. Deran,*for plaintiff in error.

*635
      *Mr. H. L. Peeke,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Crew, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### SOUTHERN-AIRE COATS OF FLORIDA, INC. v. MENDELSUND.

No. 37583.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
No. 99-1786.

#### Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Co. et al. *v.*Knudson et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motions of Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund and Self-Insurance Institute of America, Inc., for leave to file briefs as *amici curiae*granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Section 906 Certification - CFO



 
Exhibit 10.2

 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
 
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Matrix Service Company, Inc. (the
“Company”) on form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Bradley S. Vetal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge: 
 

	 	3.	 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

	 	4.	 	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 
This certification is deemed to accompany this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, but is not
deemed “filed” for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise. 
 
/s/    Michael J. Hall 
 
Michael J. Hall 
Vice President
– Financial 
And Chief Financial Officer 
October 10, 2002