alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charlie James NICHOLSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-462.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 15, 1971.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Jeffrey H. Barker, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. See Meinsen v. State, Fla.App.1970, 240 So.2d 188; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 612; Thomas *348v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 361; Fisher v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 863; Byrd v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 1; Powell v. .State, Fla.App.1971, 244 So.2d 746; and Coleman v. State, Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 699.

Affirmed.

REED, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
#### FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, Appellant, v. James L. VINSON, Appellee.

No. R-325.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 1973.

Alfred A. Green, Jr., Green & Strasser, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert Ginsberg, Ginsberg & Ginsberg, Daytona Beach, and Alan R. Schwartz, Horton, Schwartz & Perse, Miami, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment against appellant for damages in this slander of credit action is affirmed on authority of Vinson v. Ford Motor Credit Company, 259 So.2d 768 (Fla. App.1972), and Clark v. Yellow Cab Company of Miami, 195 So.2d 39 (Fla.App. 1967).

JOHNSON, Acting C. J., SPECTOR, J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge, concur.
# L_2005025EN.01005801.xml

| 28.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 25/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 25/58

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 137/2005

of 27 January 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 25 January 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 25 January 2005.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 25 January 2005, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 31,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 January 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58.

3

---
#### Dorothy P. CAHEE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORP. et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3488.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

April 22, 1971.

*280Piccione, Piccione & Wooten, by Joseph J. Piccione, Lafayette, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Dono-hoe, by J. J. Davidson, III, Lafayette, for defendants-appellees.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and HOOD, JJ.

SAVOY, Judge.

The defendants-appellees have filed a motion to remand the instant case to the district court. On March 10, 1971, an order granting an appeal in forma pauperis in favor of the plaintiff-appellant, was signed in the cause of Dorothy P. Cahee, et al vs. Associated Indemnity Corp., et al, arising out of the 15th Judicial District Court, Docket No. 45033, Lafayette Parish, Louisiana. The plaintiffs-appellants’ original petition had been filed on October 16, 1969, and was not filed in forma pauperis.

The defendants-appellees seek to have the instant case remanded to the district court for the purpose of traversing the affidavits of poverty attached to the above-mentioned petition for a devolutive appeal in forma pauperis.

On March 24, 1971, we considered the motion to remand and ordered that the plaintiff-appellant show cause on April 5, 1971, why this case should not be remanded for trial of the rule to traverse the plaintiffs-appellants’ affidavits of poverty. No appearance has been made in opposition to the rule.

The proper method of opposing the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is by a contradictory traversal of the affidavits of poverty supplied in support of the motion. LSA-C.C.P. Article 5184.

It is well settled that once an appeal is granted in forma pauperis, the proper remedy to traverse the affidavits of poverty is to make timely application to the appellate court to remand the case for such purpose. Babineaux v. Southeastern Drilling Corporation, 166 So.2d 742 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1964). See also: Brewer v. Thoele, 186 La. 168, 171 So. 839 (1937); Buckley v. Thibodaux, 181 La. 416, 159 So. 603 (1935); Malveaux v. Buller, 131 So.2d 571 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1961).

For these reasons, the case is remanded to the district court in order that the appellees may traverse the affidavits on which the appellants were permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

Remanded.
# L_2014205DE.01007901.xml

| 12.7.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 205/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 205/79

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 768/2005 des Rates vom 26. April 2005 zur Errichtung einer Europäischen Fischereiaufsichtsagentur und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2847/93 zur Einführung einer Kontrollregelung für die Gemeinsame Fischereipolitik

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 128 vom 21. Mai 2005
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 128 vom 21. Mai 2005

Auf Seite 1 im Titel:

anstatt:

„VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 768/2005 DES RATES

vom 26. April 2005

zur Errichtung einer Europäischen Fischereiaufsichtsagentur und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2847/93 zur Einführung einer Kontrollregelung für die Gemeinsame Fischereipolitik“

muss es heißen:

„VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 768/2005 DES RATES

vom 26. April 2005

zur Errichtung einer Europäischen Fischereiaufsichtsagentur und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2847/93 zur Einführung einer Kontrollregelung für die Gemeinsame Fischereipolitik“.

Auf Seite 14, Artikel 41, im zu ändernden Artikel 34c Absatz 1 letzter Unterabsatz:

anstatt:

„Die betreffenden Mitgliedstaaten setzen die spezifischen Kontrollprogramme auf der Grundlage gemeinsamer Einsatzpläne um, die gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 768/2005 des Rates vom 26. April 2005 zur Errichtung einer Europäischen Fischereiaufsichtsagentur und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2847/93 zur Einführung einer Kontrollregelung fürdie gemeinsame Fischereipolitik (**) erstellt werden.“

muss es heißen:

„Die betreffenden Mitgliedstaaten setzen die spezifischen Kontrollprogramme auf der Grundlage gemeinsamer Einsatzpläne um, die gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 768/2005 des Rates vom 26. April 2005 zur Errichtung einer Europäischen Fischereiaufsichtsagentur und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2847/93 zur Einführung einer Kontrollregelung fürdie gemeinsame Fischereipolitik (**) erstellt werden.“

---
#### James D. WILLIE v. OTASCO and Insurance from CNA.

No. 11528.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Oct. 17, 1977.

Mike J. Balen, James R. Jenkins, Coving-ton, for plaintiff, appellee.

Frederick R. Bott, New Orleans, for defendants, appellants.

Before LOTTINGER, EDWARDS and PONDER, JJ.

EDWARDS, Judge.

This is a suit for workmen’s compensation benefits brought by James D. Willie against Otasco and Insurance from CNA. The trial court rendered a default judgment; and the defendants have appealed.

This case was before us previously on a motion to dismiss the appeal, *Willie v. Otasco,*347 So.2d 1215 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1977). At that time, we dismissed the defendants’ suspensive appeal as untimely, but maintained their devolutive appeal. The case is now before us for consideration on the merits.

Our re-examination of the record has revealed a further defect in defendants’ appeal, not raised at the motion to dismiss, which necessitates that we dismiss the appeal. We lack jurisdiction to hear the appeal as we now find that the appeal bond was not filed timely.

The chronology of this suit indicates that plaintiff filed his petition on June 4, 1976. On November 2, 1976, plaintiff caused a preliminary default to be entered against the defendants because they had failed to file an answer. On November 12, 1976, counsel for plaintiff proceeded to confirm the default and the judgment was signed that date. Notice of judgment was subsequently served on the defendants on December 2nd and 3rd 1976.

*845On December 8, 1976, defendants filed a motion for a new trial. This motion was denied on January 14, 1977.

The defendants filed their appeal bond on February 14, 1977.

We find that the defendants were not entitled to notice of the default judgment, though such notice was actually sent.

Notice of the signing of a default judgment against a defendant, who filed no exceptions or answer, is required only when the defendant has not been served personally. LSA-C.C.P. art. 1913. In the instant case, both defendants received personal service. *Rue*v. *Messmer,*332 So.2d 591 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1976), writ denied 337 So.2d 525 (La.1976). Consequently notice of judgment was not required.

Therefore, the delay for applying for a new trial began on November 15, 1976 and expired on November 23, 1976. LSA-C. C.P. art. 1974. No application for a new trial was filed timely.

The delay for perfecting an appeal began on November 24, 1976, since no application for a new trial was filed timely. LSA-C. C.P. art. 2087(1).

The untimely application for a new trial, filed December 8, 1976, did not affect, interrupt or extend the delay for appealing. *Reeves v. Reeves,*315 So.2d 162 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1975).

The last day on which the defendants could have perfected their devolutive appeal was January 24, 1977. However, they did not file their appeal bond until February 14, 1977, which was 21 days too late.

As no appeal bond was filed timely we lack jurisdiction to hear the appeal. *Something Irish Co. v. Rack,*333 So.2d 773 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1976); LSA-C.C.P. art. 2088.

For the above reasons, the appeal is dismissed at appellants’ cost.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Net Perceptions, Inc.
(the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nigel
P. Ekern, as Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Nigel P. EkernName:
    
    Nigel P. EkernTitle:
    
    Chief Administrative OfficerDate:
    
    May 11, 2003
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall
not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act
or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
No. 00-7022.

#### Alford *v.*United States District Court for the Central District of California.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of MERGE HEALTHCARE INCORPORATED (Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (Report), Justin C. Dearborn, as principal executive officer of the Company, and Steven M. Oreskovich, as principal financial officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:
  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: March 17, 2010

By:

/s/ Justin C. DearbornJustin C. DearbornChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)Date: March 17, 2010

By:

/s/ Steven M. OreskovichSteven M. OreskovichChief Financial Officer(principal financial officerand principal accounting officer)
  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
I In the Council 

I October 30, 2011 

City of'Tcnak.cc Springs 

RESOLUTION 2015-05 

~I~t~·oduced by r \ 

The Council Prcsidc1;t ) 

A RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF TENAKEE SPRINGS, ALASKA 

SUPPORTING THE PROPOSAL OF AIR SERVICE TO TENAKEE SPRINGS BY AlASKA 

SRJ\PL.>\NFS 

yq-{ERF'\.S, the City ofTcna...k.cc Springs, Alaska is situated on Chichagoflsland, ·withour 

road access to the mainland; and 

\VHERFAS, Tenakee Springs is guaranteed scheduled air service under the 1978 Airline 

Deregulation Act Essential Air Sen~ce (EAS) program; and 

\YHEREAS, Scheclu .. kd air scnicc prmi.dcs a critical link to cnKrgcncy scni.ccs, nKclical 

care, equipment and supplies, 1i-eight and US mail service, and business <tlld 

tourist travel; and 

\VHEREAS, Tenakee Springs is sen·ed by our scheduled air sen~ce pro\~der Kalinin 

Aviation elba "Alaska Seaplanes" with a minimum guaranteed seven 

roundtrips per week to and hom Juneau in the summertime peak season, 

and at least three guaranteed roundtrips in the off-peak season; and 

\VHERE.AS, Alaska s~aplanes has a full fleet of straight and amphibious Hoat phmes and 

has capably scn'ed our community for 17 rears with nerfect safety record; 

<UKl 

\VHEREAS, Alaska Seaplanes proposes to continue sen~ce to Tenakee Springs under a 

new· four-year contract utilizing its existing DHC-2 Beaver/Cessna 206 fleet 

on straight floats in the summertime and amphibious Boats in the winter 

-vvhcn the Juneau pond is frozen; and 

\\l-IERF \S, Alaska Seaplanes proposes upgrading its fleet vvith the addition of an lFRcapable Cessna 208 Caravan aircraft on <unphibious floats, olTering greater 

capacity and improved reliability during poor \1sibility conditions at the 

Juneau airport when the YFR operations are othern1se grounded, 

THEREFORE BE IT R£')0LYED that the Common Council of Tenakee Springs. 

Alaska hereby endorses the Essential Air Scn~cc proposal of Aiaska Seapiancs as 

submitted for a new four year-term to DOT on a DI-IC-2/Cessna 206/Ccssna 208 platform. 

'··.! 

~~ .. ) h· 
Pg. '2 

ADOPTED 5 Aves, 1 Absent, 1 Vacant Seat THIS 30'" DAY OF October 2014 

/'\ /r( I 

ATTEST: 

-. p)z~~~ r--------- Mary Aln y ------J;:: 

City Cle1 1 

~~ Do11 Pegues ~ City Council President 

Ex ollicio MA.YOR
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
             Subsidary                                     State/Country of Incorporation

<S>                                                                   <C>
Commonwealth Seager Holdings, Ltd.                                    Canada
     Corrpro Canada, Inc.                                             Canada
     418012 Alberta Ltd.                                              Canada
     Alcoke Distributors Ltd.                                         Canada
     Commonwealth Pipeline Services (U.S.A.) Inc.                     Delaware
     D. Foley Pipeline Services Ltd.                                  Canada
     Corrosion Interventions, Ltd.                                    Canada 
Corrtherm, Inc.                                                       Ohio                   
CCFC, Inc.                                                            Nevada               
Cathodic Protection Services Company                                  Delaware     
CCI Trading, Inc.                                                     Barbados         
Good-All Electric, Inc.                                               Ohio      
Harco Arabia Cathodic Protection Co. Ltd.                             Saudi Arabia 
Harco Arabia Ground Electrode Manufacturing Co. Ltd.                  Saudi Arabia 
Corrpro Companies Middle East LLC                                     United Arab Emirates            
Harco Pacific Technologies Pte, Ltd.                                  Singapore
Harcotec de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                                      Mexico
Ocean City Research Corporation                                       New Jersey
Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc.                                        California
     Rohrback Cosasco Systems Ltd.                                    United Kingdom
Wilson Walton Group Ltd.
     1.   Wilson Walton CP Ltd.                                       United Kingdom
     2.   Wilson Walton Overseas Holding Ltd.                         United Kingdom
          1.    Corrpro Companies Asia Pacific Ltd.                   Singapore
          2.    Corrpro Companies Far East Ltd.                       Hong Kong
          3.    Wilson Walton (Portugal) Anti Corrosivos Lda.         Portugal
     3.   Corrpro Companies, Europe Ltd.                              United Kingdom
     4.   Wilson Walton (Gulf) Ltd.                                   Jersey 
     5.   Wilson Walton Belgium, sa                                   Belgium
     6.   Wilson Walton Investments Ltd.                              United Kingdom 
          1.    Wilson Walton Middle East Ltd.                        Jersey
     7.   Wilson Walton Malaysia Sdn Bnd.                             Malaysia
     8.   Wilson Walton Indonesia                                     Indonesia
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Armed Forces Epidemiological Board (AFEB)

AGENCY: Office of The Surgeon General.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of Public Law 92-463, The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, this announces the forthcoming AFEB 
Meeting. The meeting will be held from 0800-1630, Thursday and Friday, 
December 11-12, 1997. The purpose of the meeting is to address pending 
Board issues, provide briefings for Board members on topics related to 
ongoing and new Board issues, and to conduct an executive working 
session. The meeting location will be at the Walter Reed Army Institute 
Research (WRAIR), Washington, D.C. The meeting will be open to the 
public, but limited by space accommodations. Any interested person may 
attend, appear before or file statements with the committee at the time 
and in the manner permitted by the committee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
COL Vicky Fogelman, AFEB Executive Secretary, Army Forces 
Epidemiological Board, Skyline Six, 5109 Leesburg Pike, Room 693, Falls 
Church, Virginia 22041-3258, (703) 681-8012/4.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Mary V. Yonts,
Alternate Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-28282 Filed 10-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Imaging Group, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Roland Breton, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Roland Breton

Roland Breton
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
August 19, 2002
254 La. 931

#### Crayton G. HOLMAN v. M. L. BATH COMPANY, Ltd.

No. 50181.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 15, 1969.

In re: Crayton G. Holman applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Bossier. 226 So.2d 588.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.