alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## CHART

- SeQual

Technologies Inc.

Suite 500

2200 Airport Industrial Drive

Ball Ground, GA 30107

Phone: 770.721.7700 Fax: 770.721.7701

www.chart

- ind.com

DK Deaderick, ASI

Federal Aviation Administration

Air Transportation Division

121 Air Carrier Operations Branch

Survival Factors Project Team Leader

Justification for the decision not to file a 510(k)

after chan ge to a legally marketed device

Ref: "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a change to an Existing Device (K97

- 1)" from the U.S.

Department of Health and Human Services, January 10, 1997, Main Flowchart, p. 28, Flowchart A, p.29,

and Flowchart B, p. 30.

Dear Ms

. /Mrs. DK Deaderick,

As part of the devel opment of the Oxywell Oxygen System, it was nece s sary to determine whether a new

510(k) was required to market this device. The reference document above was used to make this

determination. The Oxywell Oxygen System is based on the same concep t as the existing eQuinox

Oxygen System design. The Oxywell Oxygen System is a privately branded eQuinox per the customer's

request for privately labeled eQuinox Oxygen System.

Referring to the Main Flowchart item 1, the change to the Oxywell Oxygen Syst em was not due to a recall

or corrective action. Change s were made to satisfy a customer's request for a privately labeled oxygen

system.

Flowchart A shows the justification for the labeling change per item A5. All labels will change to indicate

the Oxywe ll model name and will be written in Japanese . The label has been revised for clarity of use to

show the item is the Oxywell Oxygen System.

Flowchart B shows the justification for t he performance changed per item B8. The Oxywell will have

additional voice notificatio ns that occur in par allel to the led and/or alarm indications already present in

the baseline Equinox Software.

Finally Materials used in the Oxywell Oxygen System are the same as th e materials used in the eQuinox

Oxygen System. The size and configuration of all the components are the same.

All flowcharts lead to the conclusion that only documentation is necessary for the change to this device.

No new 510(k) is required. The change indicated here does not affect safety, effectiveness, or inte n d ed

use of this product.

Regards,

Neal Maloy

Director of Quality and Regulatory Affairs

## 28 MAIN FLOWCHART

WHEN TO FILE A 510(k) AFTER CHANGE TO

A LEGALLY MARKETED DEVICE

## 29

## 30
#### Kathleen Anna GHIDONI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-824.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 2, 1970.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Vaughn J. Rudnick, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

133 

CAF 11-01240 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF AIDEN J.W. 

--------------------------------------------- 

NIAGARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

MICHAEL E.M., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

KATHLEEN E. CASEY, BARKER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

SUSAN M. SUSSMAN, NIAGARA FALLS, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

ALVIN M. GREENE, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO, FOR AIDEN J.W. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Niagara County (John F.

Batt, J.), entered June 13, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Social

Services Law § 384-b. The order terminated the parental rights of

respondent. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order finding that

he permanently neglected his child and terminating his parental

rights. We reject the father’s contention that Family Court failed to

consider the appropriate factors, including the “special circumstances

of an incarcerated parent,” in determining that the child was

permanently neglected (Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]). Indeed,

we agree with the court that the father “has failed to demonstrate any

commitment to the responsibilities of parenthood and demonstrates a

fundamental defect in his understanding of proper parenting

responsibilities.” The petitioning agency is not required to 

“ ‘guarantee that the parent succeed in overcoming his or her

predicaments’ . . . but, rather, the parent must ‘assume a measure of

initiative and responsibility’ ” (Matter of Whytnei B. [Jeffrey B.],

77 AD3d 1340, 1341).

Entered: April 26, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. H. COX, II, et al., Defendants-Appellees, and Southwestern Electric Power Company, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13263.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

May 23, 1977.

En Banc. Rehearing Denied June 22, 1977.

Mayer, Smith & Roberts by Paul R. Mayer, Shreveport, for appellant, Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

Wilkinson, Carmody & Peatross by Arthur R. Carmody, Jr., Shreveport, for appellant, Southwestern Elec. Power Co.

Cook, Clark, Egan, Yancey & King by Gordon E. Rountree, Shreveport, for W. H. Cox, II, appellee.

Before HALL, MARVIN and JONES, JJ.

JONES, Judge.

In consolidated cases,1 Southwestern Electric Power Company and Hartford Insurance Company, appeal a solidary judgment against them arising out of a fire loss to plaintiff’s house. Hartford also complains of being cast for penalties and attorney’s fees. W. H. Cox answered the appeals, seeking an increase in the amounts awarded.

For the reasons given in *Cox v. Southwestern Electric Power Company,*348 So.2d 1252 (La.App., 2d Cir. 1977) ( # 13,-262), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Southwestern Electric Power Company and Hartford Fire Insurance Company are to pay all costs.

Affirmed.

1

. This case was consolidated at trial and on appeal with *Cox v. Southwestern Electric Pow-*ar *Company,*348 So.2d 1252 (La.App., 2d Cir. 1977) (# 13,262).
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: United    States--east coast, Rhode Island, Narragansett Bay, including Newport harbor
 
SuDocs Number: C 55.418/7:13223/
Item    Number:[if !vml]>[endif]>0191-B-13    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000869891
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
13223-4-1987.jpg
2012-04-19 15:02
33M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
13223-4-1987.pdf
2012-04-20 10:59
33M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
13223-6-1990.jpg
2012-04-19 15:02
33M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
13223-6-1990.pdf
2012-04-20 11:00
33M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
13223-10-1991.jpg
2012-04-19 15:03
40M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
13223-10-1991.pdf
2012-04-20 11:02
40M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
13223-12-1984.jpg
2012-04-19 15:01
40M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
13223-12-1984.pdf
2012-04-20 10:58
40M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Thumbs.db
2012-04-20 11:02
34K

 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  June, 8, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Electric Network.com, Inc. a
Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Stephen Hanson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Stephen Hanson
--------------------------
Stephen Hanson
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Electric Network.com, Inc., and will be retained by The Electric
Network.com, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# L_2005158EN.01000501.xml

| 21.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 158/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 158/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 935/2005

of 20 June 2005

amending Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 as regards the amount of the aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 15(b) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 2(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 of 10 October 1990 on aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk (2) sets the amount of aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk. In view of the development in the price of skimmed milk powder on the internal market and the price of casein and caseinates on the Community and world markets, the amount of the aid should be reduced. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 2(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 of 10 October 1990 on aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk (2) sets the amount of aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk. In view of the development in the price of skimmed milk powder on the internal market and the price of casein and caseinates on the Community and world markets, the amount of the aid should be reduced.

| (2) | Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 should be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 should be amended accordingly.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time-limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time-limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article (2)1 of Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90, ‘EUR 0,75’ is hereby replaced by ‘EUR 0,52’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 279, 11.10.1990, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 739/2005 (OJ L 122, 14.5.2005, p. 18).

2

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
July 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Varian, Inc.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 11, 2009                           
|                                                 
|/s/ G. EDWARD MCCLAMMY                           
|G. Edward McClammy                               
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2005168DE.01005001.xml

| 30.6.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 168/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 168/50

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2005/14/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 11. Mai 2005 zur Änderung der Richtlinien 72/166/EWG, 84/5/EWG, 88/357/EWG und 90/232/EWG des Rates sowie der Richtlinie 2000/26/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die Kraftfahrzeug-Haftpflichtversicherung

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 149 vom 11. Juni 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 149 vom 11. Juni 2005

Seite 15, Erwägungsgrund 10, Satz 4:

anstatt:

„Eine Mindestdeckungssumme von 1 000 000 EUR je Unfallopfer und 5 000 000 EUR je Schadensfall ungeachtet der Anzahl der Geschädigten erscheint angemessen und ausreichend.“

muss es heißen:

„Eine Mindestdeckungssumme von 1 000 000 EUR je Unfallopfer oder 5 000 000 EUR je Schadensfall ungeachtet der Anzahl der Geschädigten erscheint angemessen und ausreichend.“

Seite 18, Artikel 2 (Änderungen der Richtlinie 84/5/EWG), Artikel 1 Absatz 2 Buchstabe a:

anstatt:

| „a) | für Personenschäden einen Mindestdeckungsbetrag von 1 000 000 EUR je Unfallopfer und von 5 000 000 EUR je Schadensfall, ungeachtet der Anzahl der Geschädigten;“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

für Personenschäden einen Mindestdeckungsbetrag von 1 000 000 EUR je Unfallopfer und von 5 000 000 EUR je Schadensfall, ungeachtet der Anzahl der Geschädigten;“

muss es heißen:

| „a) | für Personenschäden einen Mindestdeckungsbetrag von 1 000 000 EUR je Unfallopfer oder von 5 000 000 EUR je Schadensfall, ungeachtet der Anzahl der Geschädigten;“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

für Personenschäden einen Mindestdeckungsbetrag von 1 000 000 EUR je Unfallopfer oder von 5 000 000 EUR je Schadensfall, ungeachtet der Anzahl der Geschädigten;“

---
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 20, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00555

- CR

Robert MARTINEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 307125

Honorable Jason Pulliam, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

O n Nov ember 12 , 2014, we abated this appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court

to determine, inter alia, whether Appellant is indigent, Appellant desires court

- appointed

counsel, or Appellant wishes to represent himself. We set deadlines for the trial court and

district clerk to act, but we suspended all other ap pellate deadlines.

On November 19, 2014, Appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief.

Appellant’s motion is MOOT. After we receive the supplemental record from the district clerk

, we will issue an order setting appellate deadlines.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of November, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 10088.

#### Lawson, Exr., *v.*Lawson.

(Decided January 8, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Columbiana County.

*Mr. J. G. Moore*and *Mr. Charles Boyd,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. P. M. Smith,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
<Page>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.22


                                   AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                      BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
                          DIRECTORS' STOCK OPTION PLAN

                                February 7, 2003

     This Amendment to the Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. Directors'
Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") shall be effective as of February 7, 2003,
upon ratification by the Board of Directors.

1.   The third sentence of Section 7 of the Plan is hereby amended by
deleting said sentence in its entirety and substituting therefore the
following:

          "Non-qualified Stock Options will be exercisable not earlier than
     one year and not later than ten years after the date they are granted,
     UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY THE COMMITTEE."

2.   Section 8 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a subsection (d) at the
end thereof as follows:

          "(d) Upon resignation or retirement from the Board, and provided
     the Director has served four three-year terms as a Director of the
     Company, each Director shall be awarded Non-Qualified Stock Options to
     purchase a total of 10,000 shares of Common Stock hereunder, subject to
     such restrictions, exercise limitations or other conditions as may be
     established from time to time by the Committee."

3.   Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall continue in full
force and effect. From and after the date hereof, all references in any
agreements covering awards granted under the Plan shall be deemed to be
references to the Plan as hereby amended.
ERIKA M. KANE PHONE: (512) 463-2120

Assistant Attorney General FAX: (512) 320-0667

General Litigation Division EMAIL: erika.kane@texasattorneygeneral.gov

January 7, 2015 

Hon. Jeffery D. Kyle, Clerk 

Third Court of Appeals 

P.O. Box 12547 

Austin, TX 78711 

RE: Case No. 03-14-00112-CV; Dr. James Jones v. Angelo State University; In the 

Court of Appeals for the Third Judicial District, Austin, Texas 

Dear Mr. Kyle:

 Pursuant to the Court’s request, please be advised that undersigned counsel intends to 

present oral argument in this case on behalf of the Appellee, Angelo State University. 

 

 Sincerely, 

 /s/ Erika M. Kane 

 ERIKA M. KANE

 TX Bar No. 24050850 

Assistant Attorney General

General Litigation Division

 Erika.Kane@texasattorneygeneral.gov

cc: Frank Gilstrap

P OST O FFICE B OX 12548, A USTIN , T EXAS 78711 - 2548 TEL :(512) 463 - 2100 WEB : WWW . T EXAS A TTORNEY G ENERAL . GOV

An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00112-CV

3686533

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

1/7/2015 4:01:24 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/7/2015 4:01:24 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
[RPS Energy Letterhead]

 

 

 

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**

 

We hereby consent to the use of the name RPS Energy and of references to RPS Energy and to the inclusion of and references to our report, or information contained therein, dated February 13, 2007, prepared for FX Energy in the FX Energy, Inc. annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended 31st December 2006, and the incorporation by reference to the report prepared by RPS Energy into FX Energy, Inc.’s previously filed registration statements listed below. 

 

| Form   | SEC File No. | Effective Date    |
|--------|--------------|-------------------|
|   |         |              |
| S-3    | 333-80489    | June 30, 1999     |
| S-3    | 333-104792   | October 27, 2003  |
| S-3    | 333-110345   | November 18, 2003 |
| S-3    | 333-112058   | February 11, 2004 |
| S-8    | 333-112717   | February 11, 2004 |

 

 

RPS Energy 

 

/s/ Francis Boundy

Francis Boundy

Director

 

8 March 2007
TO: Long Term Pavement Performance Program

HRDI-30

6300 Georgetown Pike

McLean, VA 22101-2296

Facsimile: (202) 493-3161

Email: LTPPINFO@dot.gov

LTPP Data Analysis/Operations

Feedback Report

Report no.: 

Date: 

Submitted by: 

Subject: 

Situation: 

Recommended action: 

Distribution Urgency (check one)

Resolution needed by: 

(Date)

Next public data extraction from the PPDB

Referred to: Assigned to: Information 

copies to:

Comments

DAOFR Category: 

Action to be taken: As recommended As outlined below Date assigned:

Date due: 

Findings/actions taken:

Date completed: 

Attach additional pages as necessary to describe situation, recommended action, and actions taken. When attaching a 

separate file to a DAOFR submittal or resolution (for example a spreadsheet) please insert a header in the file with the 

DAOFR number and include the DAOFR number as part of the file name.
# L_2010093EN.01000301.xml

| 14.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 93/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 93/3

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 of 28 February 2005 laying down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 55 of 1 March 2005
  )

On page 13, Article 2, point (c):

for:

‘ “reasonable expenditure”: costs incurred in purchasing equipment or services at prices that are disproportionate to the market value before diagnosis of the disease;’,

read:

‘ “reasonable expenditure”: costs incurred in purchasing equipment or services at prices that are not disproportionate to the market value before diagnosis of the disease;’.

For readability purposes, Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 of 28 February 2005 laying down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC will be published in the OJ in its entirety.

For readability purposes, Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 of 28 February 2005 laying down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC will be published in the OJ in its entirety.

---
254 La. 930

#### T. Ray McCLELLAND, Individually, etc. v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO., et al.

No. 50169.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 15, 1969.

In re: T. Ray McClelland, individually and on behalf of his minor daughter, Wanda McClelland, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 226 So.2d 178.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.