alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theannual report of Washington Group International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersignedofficers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tosuch officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the datesand for the periods presented in the Report.

 

March 14, 2005

 

 
|   |  /s/ Stephen G.  Hanks                           |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Stephen G. Hanks                                      |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer                |
|   |                                                  |
|   |                                                  |
|   |  /s/ George H.  Juetten                          |   |
|   | George H. Juetten                                     |
|   | Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, andis not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

1

----
No. 72-1113.

#### Pennsylvania *v.*Lopinson.

Sup. Ct. Pa. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit (p)(1)

 

----
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01
 
                              ESS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                              -------------------------------
                                                               1996        1997        1998
                                                              -------    --------    --------
<S>                                                           <C>        <C>         <C>
Weighted average common shares..............................   37,702      39,953      40,955
Weighted average incremental common equivalent shares:
  Common stock(2)...........................................    3,886          --          --
  Cheap stock(2)............................................       --          --          --
                                                              -------    --------    --------
Total weighted average common and common equivalent
  shares....................................................   41,588      39,593      40,955
                                                              =======    ========    ========
Net income (loss)...........................................  $21,626    $(10,866)   $(28,016)
                                                              =======    ========    ========
Net income (loss) per share.................................  $  0.52    $  (0.27)   $  (0.68)
                                                              =======    ========    ========
</TABLE>
 
---------------
 
(1) This Exhibit should be read in conjunction with Note 1 of Notes to
    Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
(2) Earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common
    and common equivalent shares ("weighted average shares") outstanding during
    the period. Common equivalent shares consist of the Company's common stock
    issuable upon exercise of stock options (using the treasury stock method),
    except when antidilutive. Common stock issued and stock options granted
    subsequent to July 31, 1994 through October 5, 1995, (the date of the
    initial public offering) have been included in the calculation of weighted
    average shares outstanding as if they were outstanding for reporting periods
    occurring between these dates. The Company used the treasury stock method
    and the initial public offering price of $15.00 per share for these
    calculations.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**ELEANOR REGINELLI AND ORLANDO**

**REGINELLI**

**v.**

**MARCELLUS BOGGS, M.D., AND MONONGAHELA VALLEY HOSPITAL,** 

**INC. AND UPMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, INC., D/B/A EMERGENCY**  **RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC.**

**PETITION OF: MONONGAHELA VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC.**  **:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 39 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 7 th**  **day of July, 2016, the Petitions for Allowance of App eal are** 

GRANTED **, limited to the following issues, as stated by petition ers:** 

**1. Whether the Superior Court erred by holding an o utside medical provider’s**  **peer review proceedings regarding its employees who staf f a hospital’s**  **Emergency Department under a contract with that hosp ital are not entitled**  **to protection from disclosure under the Pennsylvania Pee r Review** 

**Protection Act?**

**2. Whether the sharing of peer review records by a thi rd-party medical**  **provider that operates a hospital’s Emergency Departmen t with the**  **administration of that hospital constitutes a waiver o f peer review**  **protection as to those records?**

**3. Whether a hospital that contracts with a third-part y medical provider to**  **operate the hospital’s Emergency Department may claim p rotection under**  **the Peer Review Protection Act for records of peer re view proceedings** **[39 WAL 2016] - 2 conducted by the medical provider regarding its employe**  **es who staff the hospital’s Emergency Department?** 

**These matters are to be listed for argument with the p etitions granted at 40, 41 &** 

**42 WAL 2016.**
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
April 1, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Varian,
Inc.



Dated: May 11, 2005



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ GARRY W. ROGERSON                                  
|Garry W. Rogerson President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-1004 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Research and Development 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and FINLAND 

Amending and Extending 

the Agreement of October 5, 1995 

Signed at Arlington and Helsinki 

May 7 and 25, 2010 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 FINLAND 

 Defense: Research and Development 

Agreement amending and extending the agreement of 

 October 5, 1995. 

Signed at Arlington and Helsinki May 7 and 25, 2010; 

Entered into force October 4, 2010.
#### George O. PRATT, Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board et al., Appellants, v. Charles Bank STOUT et al.

No. 10647.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1936.

Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, National’ Labor Relations Board, Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, William R. Walsh, Litigation Division, National Labor Relations Board, and George Pratt, Director, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

John G. Madden and Alfred Kuraner,. both of Kansas City, Mo., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed without costs to either party in this court, pursuant to stipulation' of parties.
#### Frank GLUSMAN, Petitioner, v. Arnold LIEBERMAN, Respondent.

No. 44727.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 7, 1974.

Certiorari dismissed.
# L_2005148EN.01000301.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 148/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 148/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 881/2005

of 10 June 2005

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

| (2) | Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 at 11 500 t. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 at 11 500 t.

| (3) | It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 June 2005 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2.   Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of July 2005 for 958,333 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).

2

---
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 199 / Wednesday, October 15, 1997 / Presidential Documents 53697

Proclamation 7039 of October 10, 1997

Columbus Day, 1997

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

The life and achievements of Christopher Columbus demonstrate how powerful and lasting an influence one individual can have on the course of

human history. Although great explorers reached the shores of this continent

both before and after Columbus, few have captured the American imagination

as he has. Perhaps because we have always been an adventurous people,

eager for challenge and change, we feel a special affinity for this extraordinary

man who left the safety of known waters to pursue his vision across the

ocean to the threshold of a new world.

Although his momentous voyages across the Atlantic took place more than

500 years ago, their impact can still be felt today. Columbus’ discoveries

in the West Indies brought about substantive and continuing contact between

the peoples of the Old World and the New, contact that gave rise to misunderstandings and conflicts that we still seek to reconcile today. He also made

possible the exploration and settlement of North America and opened the

door to our continent for generations to follow—people of every race and

culture and ethnic origin, who have given our Nation its rich and unique

diversity. Christopher Columbus, a son of Italy whose bold enterprise was

made possible by the Spanish crown, holds a special place in the hearts

of Americans of Italian and Spanish heritage. But, as we prepare for our

own voyage of discovery into the next millennium, all Americans can draw

inspiration from the character and accomplishments of Columbus. With

vision, courage, imagination, and optimism, we can create a future bright

with promise and a new world where all of us can pursue our dreams.

In recognition of the enduring achievements of Christopher Columbus, the

Congress, by joint resolution of April 30, 1934 (48 Stat. 657), and an Act

of June 28, 1968 (82 Stat. 250), has requested the President to proclaim

the second Monday in October of each year as ‘‘Columbus Day.’’

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, do hereby proclaim October 13, 1997, as Columbus Day. I

call upon the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate

ceremonies and activities. I also direct that the flag of the United States

be displayed on all public buildings on the appointed day in honor of

Christopher Columbus.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this tenth day of

October, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-seven, and

of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 97–27541

Filed 10–14–97; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and twenty-second.

œ–
Request for Additional Information - Northwest Aerial Perspectives 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Ethen: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA-2015-1460). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 10:44 AM 

To: teimages@sbcglobal.net 

Cc: May, Rick (FAA) 

 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which 

is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request 

any further, we must receive the information described above by 9/10/2015. If we do not 

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

 

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety. 

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Request for Additional Information - Northwest Aerial Perspectives Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note... 8/26/2015
#### Ex parte Floyd CARTER.

77-363.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 31, 1978.

FAULKNER, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: REESTABLISHMENT OF THE

M AGISTERIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE

42 nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :

:

:

: NO. 497

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

P ER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12 th day of July 20 22 , upon consideration of the Petition to

Reestablish the Magisterial District s of the 42 nd Judicial District ( Bradford County) of the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED that the

Petition, which provides for the reestablishment of Magisterial District 42

- 3

- 02 within

Bradford County as it currently exist s , to be effective immediately ; and that the

realignment of Magisterial Districts 42

- 3

- 01, 42

- 3

- 03, and 42

- 3

- 04, to be effective

November 1, 2022, is granted

Said M agisterial Districts will be reestablished as follows :

Magisterial District 42

- 3

- 01

Magisterial District Judge Jonathan W. Wilcox Alba Borough

Armenia Township

Canton Borough

Canton Township

Columbia T ownship

Granville Township

Le R oy Township

Ridgebury Township

Smithfield Township

South Creek Township

Springfield Township

Sylvania Borough

Troy BoroughTroy Township

Ulster Township

Wells Township

West Burlington Township

Magisterial District 42

- 3

- 02

Magisterial District Judge Larry J. Hurley Athens Borough

Athens Township

Sayre Borough

South Waverly Borough

Magisterial District 42

- 3

- 03

Magisterial District Judge Todd A. Carr Albany Township

Burlington Township

Burlington Borough

Franklin Township

Monroe Borough

Monroe Township

New Albany Borough

North Towanda Township

Overton Township

Towanda Borough

Towanda Township

Magisterial District 42

- 3

- 04

Magisterial District Judge Fred M. Wheaton Asylum Township

Herrick Township

LeRaysville Borough

Litchfield Township

Orwell Township

Pike Township

Rome Borough

Rome Township

Sheshequin Township

Standing Stone Township

Stevens Township

Terry Township

Tuscarora Township

Warren Township

Wilmot Township

Windham Township

Wysox Township

Wyalusing Borough

Wyalusing Township
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-65454) of PDVSA Finance Ltd. And Petroleos de
Venezuela, S.A. of our report dated February 14, 2003 relating to the financial
statements of LYONDELL-CITGO Refining LP, which appears in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of PDV America, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Houston, Texas
March 28, 2003
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William Thomas Large, the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Financial
Officer of Torbay Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best
of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 15, 2003





By: /s/ William Thomas Large
------------------------------------
Name:  William Thomas Large
Title: Chief Executive Officer and
       Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
March 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Varian, Inc.



Dated: May 8, 2007



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/S/ GARRY W. ROGERSON                                  
|Garry W. Rogerson President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. ER96-399-000; EL96-35-001]


Northern Indiana Public Service Company and Wabash Valley Power 
Association, Inc. v. Northern Indiana Public Service Company; Notice of 
Filing

October 22, 1997.
    Please take notice that on August 6, 1997, Northern Indiana Public 
Service Company (Northern Indiana) filed its refund report in the above 
captioned case.
    Copies of the refund report have been served on all parties and on 
the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with the Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before November 3, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28457 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M