alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 
 
 I, Kevin
D. Johnson, certify that;
 
 (1) I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Snap2 Corporation;
 
 (2) Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 (3) Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4) The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and
 
 (5) The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting,
to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small
business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.
 
 
 
 Date:  May 18,
2005
 
 /s/   
 Kevin D. Johnson
 By:  
 Kevin D. Johnson
 Title:
Chief Executive Officer
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

1. DATE OF REQUEST

PRINT

FORM FHWA-1113 (Rev. 3-11)

CLEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC MATERIALS

VIDEO, PRINT, WEB, SOCIAL MEDIA, OR MULTIMEDIA

2. DATE REQUIRED

3. ORIGINATING OFFICE

INSTRUCTIONS - As required by FHWA Order 2-4, requests for publications, videos and exhibits to be 

shown to the public or any external audience (outside DOT) shall be submitted to the Office of Public 

Affairs for review and approval as early in the conceptual stage as possible. Visual presentations (e.g., 

PowerPoint) that will be publically accessible on any FHWA Web site, and/or contain high level policy or 

budget information to be shared with the public or any external audience, must also be submitted to the 

Office of Public Affairs for review and approval prior to posting or dissemination.

4. REFER QUESTIONS TO

5. OFFICE PHONE

6. PROPOSED TITLE OR SUBJECT

7. WHY PRODUCT IS NEEDED

8. MESSAGE OR STORY

9. PROPOSED AUDIENCE

10. MEDIUM POWERPOINT

11. APPROVAL RECOMMENDED (Signature of Program Liaison)

12. COMMENTS / NOTES

13. ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COST (To be filled in by Publishing and Visual Communications Team)

14. PRODUCT APPROVED IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS BY

11A. DATE

12A. DATE

14A. DATE

9A. DISTRIBUTION STRATEGY

OTHER

10A. JUSTIFICATION FOR TYPE OF MEDIUM

VIDEO WEB SOCIAL MEDIA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                           1,057
<SECURITIES>                                     2,855
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                       257
<INVENTORY>                                     11,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,705
<PP&E>                                          25,287
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,395
<BONDS>                                         13,793
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,721
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,224
<SALES>                                         37,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,578
<CGS>                                           24,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    518
<INCOME-TAX>                                       341
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                177
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (206)
<NET-INCOME>                                      (28)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 159 (Thursday, August 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 49476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20162]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7982]

Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Proposed New 
International Trade Crossing (NITC) Presidential Permit Application

    In response to requests, the Department of State is extending the 
public comment period for the New International Trade Crossing (NITC) 
Presidential Permit application. The Department of State had originally 
set the end of the comment period at August 9, 2012. The Department has 
decided, in response to the requests noted above, to extend the comment 
period until September 10, 2012. Interested parties may submit written 
comments via email to NITCComments@state.gov.
    The original notice of receipt of the Presidential Permit 
application was published by the Department of State in the Federal 
Register on Wednesday, July 11, 2012. [Public Notice 7951]. The 
Presidential permit application can be viewed online at http://www.state.gov/p/wha/rt/permit/.

    Dated: July 10, 2012.
Elizabeth L. Martinez,
Director, Office of Canadian Affairs, Bureau of Western Hemisphere 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-20162 Filed 8-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10K AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             340,511
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,234,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                        86,635
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,409,267
<PP&E>                                             430,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                     988,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,879,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,349,582
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               285
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,796,190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,879,572
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,815,718
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,829,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,293,101
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    64,028
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,028,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,597,649)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,597,649)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,597,649)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.24)



</TABLE>
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo20824 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
# APPENDIX VIII

## IDAHO HANDLER ACTIVITY COUNT REPORT' July 1,2011 Total Number of Handlers {includes inactive/non-notifier sites) ................................3,089 Total Number ofActive Generators .............................................................................968 Large Quantity Generators ............................................................................................24 Small Quantity Generators ..........................................................................................113 Conditional Exempt SQGs ...........................................................................................831 HW Transporters ...........................................................................................................46 Subject to CEI Universe (Calculated Universe) ............................................................. 10 BIFs 

# o Incinerators 

# o Land Disposers 10 Treatment/Storage 

### 3 Used Oit Fuel Handlers (Notifiers) .................." .............................................................43 1$t Spec Marketers 

### 17 Off-Spec Burners 10 Off-Spec Marketers 

### 8 Processers/Re-Refiners 

### 5 Transporters 30 Universal Waste Handlers (Idaho Department of Agriculture) ....................................... 18

Source: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Infonnation (RCRAlnfo). Idaho State Notifiers Database (generated from the Notification of Regulated Waste Activity Forms [8700-12] submitted to DEQ). File: IH (RCRA Admin)
Exhibit 31.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









I, David Koos, Chief Executive Officer of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (“Registrant”) certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Registrant;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.








Date: May 26, 2011
By:
/s/ David R. KoosDavid R. KoosPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(Nos. 333-106542, 333-89942, 333-72796, 333-64667 and 333-29945) of ESS Technology, Inc. of ourreport dated March 13, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in ESS Technology Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2005./S/ Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP
International Fuel Technology, Inc. 10-Q






EXHIBIT 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In conjunction with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Fuel Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stuart D. Beath, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May 14, 2010

By:
/s/ Stuart D. BeathName:
Stuart D. BeathTitle:
Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Net Perceptions, Inc.
(the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas
M. Donnelly, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Thomas M. DonnellyName:
    
    Thomas M. DonnellyTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    May 11, 2003
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall
not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act
or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
#### In re William DORSEY. v. UNITED STATES PIPE AND FOUNDRY COMPANY. Ex parte William Dorsey.

Civ. 1108.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 4, 1978.

BRADLEY, Judge.

Upon remand to this court by the Supreme Court of Alabama it is considered that this cause should be reversed in accordance with the opinion rendered by the supreme court on December 9, 1977 in the above cause, 353 So.2d 800, and remanded to the Circuit Court of Jefferson County for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HOLMES, J., and PAUL, Retired Circuit Judge, sitting by special appointment, concur.
Department of Homeland Security 

Office of Inspector General 

Review of the Department of Homeland 
 

Security’s Capability to Share 
 

Cyber Threat Information 
 

(Redacted) 
 

OIG-11-117 September 2011 
Office of Inspector General 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Washington, DC 20528 

 

 

September 29, 2011

Preface 

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) was 

established by the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-296) by amendment 

to the Inspector General Act of 1978. This is one of a series of audit, inspection, and 

special reports prepared as part of our oversight responsibilities to promote economy, 

efficiency, and effectiveness within the Department. 

This report addresses the strengths and weaknesses of the Department’s capability to 

share cyber threat information among its federal, state, local, and tribal governments and 

private sector partners. It is based on direct observations and analyses of applicable 

documents. We obtained additional supporting documentation through interviewing 

personnel from selected federal agencies and companies in the private sector. 

The recommendations herein have been developed to the best knowledge available to our 

office, and have been discussed in draft with those responsible for implementation. We 

trust this report will result in more effective, efficient, and economical operations. We 

express our appreciation to all of those who contributed to the preparation of this report. 

Charles K. Edwards 

Acting Inspector General 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 








 

 

 
 
 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND COPIES 

fax your request to (202) 254-4305, or visit the OIG web site at www.dhs.gov/oig. 

OIG HOTLINE 

To report alleged fraud, waste, abuse or mismanagement, or any other kind of criminal or noncriminal 

misconduct relative to department programs or operations: 

• Call our Hotline at 1-800-323-8603; 

• Fax the complaint directly to us at (202) 254-4292; 

• Email us at DHSOIGHOTLINE@dhs.gov; or 

• Write to us at: 

DHS Office of Inspector General/MAIL STOP 2600, 

245 Murray Drive, SW, Building 410, 

Washington, DC 20528. 

The OIG seeks to protect the identity of each writer and caller.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 0684 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 215

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### In spection 3.0 $ 255.00 $0 $ 255.00 

### 10 $ 2,550.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in compliance: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 2,550 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/h our) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regula tory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanat ion: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answe r.
YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :