alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (j)

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the references to our firm under the caption “Financial Highlights” in the DWS Large Cap Value Fund Class A, Class B, Class C, Class S, and Institutional Class Shares, the DWS Dreman Small Cap Value Fund Class A, Class B, Class C, Class S, and Institutional Class Shares, the DWS Dreman High Return Equity Fund  Class A, Class B, Class C, Class R, Class S, and Institutional Class Shares, the DWS Dreman Mid Cap Value Fund Class A, Class B, Class C, Class S, and Institutional Class Shares, and the DWS Dreman Concentrated Value Fund Class A, Class B, Class C, and Institutional Class Shares (collectively the “Funds”) Prospectuses and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Financial Statements” in the Funds’ Statements of Additional Information, and to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment Number 55 to the RegistrationStatement (Form N-1A, No. 33-18477) of our report dated January 23, 2009, on the financial statements and financial highlights of the DWS Large Cap Value Fund, DWS Dreman Small Cap Value Fund, DWS Dreman High Return Equity Fund, DWS Dreman Mid Cap Value Fund, and DWS Dreman Concentrated Value Fund, included in the Funds’ Annual Reports dated November 30, 2008.

 

|   | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|--------|---------------------------|

 

Boston, Massachusetts

March 2, 2009
#### Curley BRINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-238.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 15, 1970.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Leslie v. State, 35 Fla. 184, 17 So. 559; Lowman v. State, 80 Fla. 18, 85 So. 166; Carr v. State, 45 Fla. 11, 34 So. 892.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J.. and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3768 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3768

To extend and modify the transportation grant program of the Department 
              of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 8 (legislative day, February 7), 2024

 Mr. Cramer (for himself and Mr. King) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend and modify the transportation grant program of the Department 
              of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Rural Veterans Access to 
Healthcare Services Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF TRANSPORTATION GRANT PROGRAM OF 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 307 of the Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health Services 
Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-163; 38 U.S.C. 1710 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the 
                following new subparagraphs:
                    ``(C) Tribal organizations.
                    ``(D) Native Hawaiian organizations.''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ``State veterans 
                service agency or veterans service organization 
                awarded'' and inserting ``recipient of'';
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph 
                (4); and
                    (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following 
                new paragraphs:
            ``(2) Native hawaiian organization.--The term `Native 
        Hawaiian organization' has the meaning given that term in 
        section 6207 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
        1965 (20 U.S.C. 7517).
            ``(3) Tribal organization.--The term `Tribal organization' 
        has the meaning given that term in section 4 of the Indian 
        Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 
        5304).''; and
            (3) in subsection (d), by striking ``$3,000,000 for each of 
        fiscal years 2010 through 2022'' and inserting ``such sums as 
        may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028''.
                                 <all>
```
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

Number Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Unit Accessed Applicant County

MN-03 Forest Highway 3 Resurfacing & 

Rehabilitation

U.S. Forest Service - 

Chippewa National 

Forest

Beltrami County Beltrami

MN-04 Minesota River Greenway- Black 

Dog Trail Segment Trail Construction

U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service - Minnesota 

Valley National Wildlife 

Refuge

City of Burnsville Dakota

MN-06 Mississippi River Trail - Spring 

Lake Park Reserve Trail Construction

National Park Service - 

Mississippi National 

River and Recreation 

Area

Dakota County 

Office of Planning Dakota

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Minnesota Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its initial, multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Minnesota FLAP are listed below in no particular order, and include:

Minnesota Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2013-2014

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these agreements. Funding for these projects is not guaranteed. Funding beyond FY 

2014 is dependent on reauthorization of the Access Program by Congress. The Minnesota PDC does not have a firm date for the next call for projects 

under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. If you have any questions please contact David Payne, Access Program 

Manager, at 571-434-1543 or email at David.Payne@dot.gov.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28801]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources 
(#1119).
    Date & Time: November 17, 1997--10:15 a.m.-4:00 p.m.; November 
18, 1997--8:30 a.m.-3:00 p.m.
    Place: Arlington Hilton Hotel, 950 N. Stafford Street, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Persons: Lucretia Dawson, Administrative Officers, 
Directorate of Education and Human Resources, Room 805, Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-1601.
    Summary Minutes: May be obtained from contact person listed 
above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning NSF support for Education and Human Resources.
    Agenda: Review of FY 1997 Programs and Initiative Strategic 
Planning for FY 1998 and Beyond.
    Reason for closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-28801 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly report of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: July 21, 2010




By:
/s/ David R. KoosDavid R. KoosActing Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. and will be retained by Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

EXHIBIT 10.1.7  


Renco Steel Holdings, Inc.

30 Rockefeller Plaza Suite 4225

New York NY 10112  


212-541-6000

Facsimile 212-541-6197  


 
 

RENCO STEEL HOLDINGS, INC.    
    
    8.75% PROMISSORY NOTE DUE UPON DEMAND    
  


$2,800,000 


        FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Renco Steel Holdings, Inc., an Ohio corporation ("Renco Steel"), hereby promises to pay to the order of The Renco Group, Inc., a New
York corporation ("Renco"), the principal amount of TWO MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,800,000) together with interest, compounded monthly, on the principal amount hereof and accrued
interest at the rate of 8.75% per annum from the date hereof until paid, such interest to be payable together with the principal amount upon demand by Renco, which demand may be made at any time. 



        The
undersigned may prepay, at any time, the entire balance of principal and interest owed under this Note without penalty or premium of any nature. 


        Renco's
right to payment pursuant to this Note is hereby contractually subordinated in right of payment to Renco Steel's obligations under Renco Steel's 107/8% Senior
Secured Notes, due 2005. 


        Should
the indebtedness represented by this Note be placed in the hands of attorneys for collection, the undersigned agrees to pay, in addition to the principal and interest due and
payable hereon, all costs of collecting this Note, including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses. 


        This
Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 


        This
note is dated July 31, 2002. 



	 	 	 	RENCO STEEL HOLDINGS, INC.

  
	

 	
 	

 	

By:	

 	
 	

 
	 	 	 	 	
 Name:

Title:











QuickLinks


RENCO STEEL HOLDINGS, INC. 8.75% PROMISSORY NOTE DUE UPON DEMAND
# L_2005154EN.01001801.xml

| 17.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/18

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 910/2005

of 16 June 2005

granting no export refund for butter in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 581/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 581/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain types of butter (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 581/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain types of butter (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 14 June 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 14 June 2005.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 581/2004, for the tendering period ending on 14 June 2005 no export refund shall be granted for the products and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 64.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58.

3

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 13, 2016

NO. 03

- 16

- 00003

- CV

Kit Fankhauser, Appellant

v.

Gateway McKenzie, LLC d/b/a The Kenzie at The Domain, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court . Having reviewed the record , the

Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted his appeal and di d not comply with a notice

from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal fo r want of prosecution.

A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

**FORM N-PX**

**ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF**

**DWS Strategic Government Securities Fund**

Investment Company Act file number  811-2719

DWS Strategic Government Securities Fund

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

John Millette

Secretary

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA  02108-3106

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  617-295-1000

Date of fiscal year end:  10/31

Date of reporting period:  7/1/07-6/30/08

Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.

 
```

******************************* FORM N-Px REPORT *******************************

ICA File Number: 811-02719
Reporting Period: 07/01/2007 - 06/30/2008
DWS Strategic Government Securities Fund (formerly DWS U.S. Government Securities
Fund)

================= A   DWS STRATEGIC GOVERNMENT SECURITIES FUND =================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND

========== END NPX REPORT
```

 

----
**EXHIBIT 21.01**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OFMONARCH CASINO & RESORT, INC.**

 
| **Subsidiary**                                                | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of********Incorporation** | ** ** | **Percentage********Ownership** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------|------------|
|                                                          |       |                                     |       |                            |       |
| Golden Road Motor Inn, Inc., dba Atlantis  Casino Resort |       | Nevada                                   |       | 100                             | %          |
|                                                          |       |                                     |       |                            |       |
| Golden Town, Inc.                                        |       | Nevada                                   |       | 100                             | %          |
|                                                          |       |                                     |       |                            |       |
| High Desert Sunshine, Inc.                               |       | Nevada                                   |       | 100                             | %          |
|                                                          |       |                                     |       |                            |       |
| Golden North, Inc.                                       |       | Nevada                                   |       | 100                             | %          |

 

----
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
-----------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement Nos. 333-100165, 333-54392, 333-27291 and 333-21283 on Form S-3, and
Registration Statement Nos. 333-97893, 333-47596, 333-03465, and 333-61611 on
Form S-8 of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. of our report dated February 21,
2003, (March 11, 2003 as to Note W; May 20, 2003 as to the effects of the
restatement discussed in Note X ) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion
and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption of new accounting
principles described in Notes B and P and the restatement discussed in Note X),
appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Seattle, Washington
May 20, 2003
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of RedCell Power Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended MARCH 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.the report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: October 18, 2006  /s/ Michael LaidlawMichael LaidlawPresident and Chief Executive Officer
1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-2837

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Jorge Eduardo Pablo-Lepe, also known * as Jorge Lopez Cortez, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 17, 2005 Filed: March 31, 2005

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In this direct criminal appeal, Jorge Pablo-Lepe challenges the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to an immigration offense. He argues that (1) the district court erred in holding the federal Sentencing Guidelines unconstitutional; and (2) even if the Guidelines are unconstitutional, the court erred by imposing a discretionary sentence that was unguided by the applicable Guidelines range.-2- These arguments fail. First, during the pendency of this appeal, the Supreme Court held in United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738, 765-67 (2005), that the federal Sentencing Guidelines are unconstitutional insofar as they are mandatory, and thus they are merely advisory; and that appellate courts should review post-Booker sentences for reasonableness. Second, we find that the sentence imposed was neither unguided nor unreasonable. The district court took the Guidelines into account by recognizing the Guidelines range, see United States v. Yahnke , 395 F.3d 823, 824 (8th Cir. 2005) (district courts, while not bound by Guidelines, must take them into account in sentencing), but the court chose to impose a higher sentence based on Pablo-Lepe’s history and characteristics, and the need to protect the public from future harm by him, seeBooker , 125 S. Ct. at 764-65 (18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) guides appellate determination of reasonableness); Yahnke , 395 F.3d at 825-26 (affirming, as reasonable, sentence based on § 3553(a) factors of history and characteristics of defendant and need to protect public). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
259 La. 63

#### William WATTS, Jr. et al. v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE et al.

No. 51518.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1971.

In re: Parish of East Baton Rouge applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 248 So.2d 42.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.