alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

               SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES

                                -----------------

                          DWS Global Opportunities Fund

Effective immediately, the following information replaces similar information
about the portfolio management team in the "Portfolio management" section of the
fund's prospectuses:

The following person handles the day-to-day management of the fund:


DWS Global Opportunities Fund
  Joseph Axtell, CFA
  Managing Director of Deutsche Asset
  Management and Portfolio Manager of
  the fund.
   o Joined Deutsche Asset Management in
     2001 and the funds in 2002.
   o Senior analyst at Merrill Lynch
     Investment Managers for the
     international equity portion of a
     global balanced portfolio (1996-2001).
   o Director, International Research at
     PCM International (1989-1996).
   o Associate manager, structured debt and
     equity group at Prudential Capital
     Corporation (1988-1989).
   o Analyst at Prudential-Bache Capital
     Funding in London (1987-1988).
   o Equity analyst in the healthcare
     sector at Prudential Equity Management
     Associates (1985-1987).
   o BS, Carlson School of Management,
     University of Minnesota.




               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference




                                                                     [Logo]DWS
                                                                   INVESTMENTS
                                                           Deutsche Bank Group

August 14, 2009
DGINTF2-3601
Order entered January 3 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00847 - CR WESLEY MON MATHEWS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17 - 45865 - S



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 2, 2020 second motion for extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or before F ebruary 5, 2020

. Appellant is cautioned that further extensions are disfavored.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
# L_2005052EN.01003401.xml

| 25.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 52/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 52/34

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 319/2005

of 24 February 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the import of sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2275/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003, on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction from third countries in the duty on sorghum imported into Spain was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2275/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction from third countries in the duty on sorghum imported into Spain was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2275/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 18 to 24 February 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2275/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 396, 31.12.2004, p. 32.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 1, 2008 |  | /s/ GARY E. DICKERSON  
|                        |  | Gary E. Dickerson      
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27897]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on September 10, 1997, Nycomed, 
Inc., 33 Riverside Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 12144, made application 
to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of meperidine (9230) a basic class of controlled substance 
listed in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to manufacture bulk product for distribution to its 
customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than December 22, 1997.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-27897 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### David GODING, Petitioner, v. BAKER AND COMPANY, Florida, a Florida corporation, Respondent.

No. 44086.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 22, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 277 So.2d 796.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28299]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

    Date and Time: Tuesday, October 28, 1997 at 10:00 a.m.
    Place: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.
    Items to be Discussed: 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and Title 
26, U.S.C.
Maters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

    Date and Time: Thursday, October 30, 1997, at 10:00 a.m.
    Place: 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. (ninth floor)
    Status: This meeting will be open to the public.
    Items to be discussed:

    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 219-4155.
Marjorie W. Emmons,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-28299 Filed 10-21-95; 3:19 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3698 

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to revise references 

in such title to individuals with intellectual disabilities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2024 

Mr. MORAN (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to 

revise references in such title to individuals with intellectual disabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Words Matter for the 

5 District of Columbia Courts Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES TO INDIVIDUALS WITH INTELLEC7 TUAL DISABILITIES. 

8 (a) JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT

9 COURT.—Section 11–501(2)(D), District of Columbia OfVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:14 Feb 03, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3698.IS S3698

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3698 IS

1 ficial Code, is amended by striking ‘‘substantially retarded 

2 persons’’ and inserting ‘‘persons with moderate intellec3 tual disabilities’’. 

4 (b) JURISDICTION OF SUPERIOR COURT.—Section 

5 11–921(a)(4)(D), District of Columbia Official Code, is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘substantially retarded persons’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘persons with moderate intellectual disabilities’’. 

8 (c) JURISDICTION OF FAMILY COURT.—Section 11– 

9 1101(a)(15), District of Columbia Official Code, is amend10 ed by striking ‘‘the at least moderately mentally retarded’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘persons with moderate intellectual disabil12 ities’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0246p.06 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA , Plaintiff-Appellee ,

v

.

R

AY G IBSON , Defendant-Appellant

. ┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ┘ No. 15-6122

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky at London. No. 6:14-cr-00025-1—Amul R. Thapar, District Judge. Argued: October 11, 2017
Decided and Filed: October 31, 2017
Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BA TCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DO NALD, and BUSH, Circuit Judges. *

_________________ COUNSEL

ARGUED EN BANC: Dennis C. Belli, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Finnuala K. Tessier, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC E, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF: Dennis C. Belli, Columbus, Oh io, for Appellant. Finnuala K. Tessier, UNITED STATES DEPA RTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., Charles P. Wisdom, Jr., John Patrick Grant, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellee.

* Judge Amul R. Thapar recused himself from participation in this ruling. 

### >No. 15-6122 United States v. Gibson Page 2

_________________ ORDER

_________________ This case was heard by the en banc court on October 11, 2017. The en banc court is evenly divided; therefore, the sentence im posed by the district court is AFFIRMED. See Sch. Dist. of City of Pontiac v. Sec’y of U.S. Dep’t of Educ. , 584 F.3d 253, 256 (6th Cir. 2009) (en banc); Stupak-Thrall v. United States , 89 F.3d 1269, 1269 (6th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-731 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CONSULAR RELATIONS 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and VIETNAM 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Hanoi July 29 and 31, 2009 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
VIETNAM 

Consular Relations 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes 

 at Hanoi July 29 and 31, 2009; 

 Entered into force July 31, 2009.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended January 2, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 10, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ GARY E. DICKERSON  
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | Gary E. Dickerson      
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32

CEO/CFO Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bank Building Corporation,
certifies that to the best of his knowledge and belief the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bank Building Corporation at the dates and for
the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to
update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                  |  |                                                                                     
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 1, 2006 |  | /s/ Worth Harris Carter, Jr.                                                        
|                  |  | Worth Harris Carter, Jr.                                                            
|                  |  | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer
New Jersey Complete Streets Design Guide

Using Complete Streets Guides to Support STEP Countermeasures

Summary

The 2017 Complete Streets Design Guide is a 

concise but thorough reference guide for designing 

streets to meet multimodal and community 

needs. The guide includes the Complete Streets 

toolbox that draws on best practices from a variety 

of national design standards and guidelines, 

emphasizes the role of context and flexibility during 

the design process, and describes the benefits and 

applications of numerous design options. 

Highlights

FLEXIBILITY IN DESIGN: A flexible approach to design is 

a critical component of Complete Streets. The key 

to achieving greater flexibility is understanding all 

the guidance documents available (including this 

guide) and applying appropriate designs to achieve 

desired outcomes. (p. viii)

COMPLETE STREETS TOOLBOX: The toolbox provides 

a primer on common design treatments and their 

typical applications, design considerations, and how 

they impact different modes. (p. 31)

STREET TYPOLOGIES: Community context and 

transportation needs are reflected in the guide’s 

street typologies. (p. 147)

Sponsoring Agencies: New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT); Federal Highway Administration 

(FHWA)

Plan Date: 2017

URL: http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/eng/completestreets/pdf/NJCS_DesignGuide.pdf 

FHWA-SA-18-058

Image Source: NJDOT Complete Streets Design Guide, 2017

Curb Extensions

A

A

MEASURING SUCCESS: An updated performance 

metric might look at crash reduction, reduced 

vehicle miles traveled, or shifts in mode share to 

walking, biking, and/or transit trips as measures 

of success. (p. 29)

DESIGN GUIDANCE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS:

The guide provides detailed guidance on 

pedestrian countermeasures including gateway 

treatments (p. 114), curb radii (p. 115), curb 

extension (p. 120), crossing islands (p. 122), 

raised crosswalks (p. 125), and crosswalk 

design. (p. 131)

ROAD DIETS AND RESURFACING: A Complete 

Streets policy requires that during road 

reconstruction and resurfacing projects, an 

assessment is conducted to examine the 

feasibility of reallocating space in the roadway 

to better accommodate pedestrians, bicycles, 

and transit vehicles. (p. 65)

Pedestrian Crossing Distance Before and After Curb Extensions

Image Source: NJDOT Complete Streets Design Guide, 2017
@Q Eastern Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle

US.Department Highway Division Sterling, VA 20166-6511

of Transportation

Federal Highway
Administration

SENT VIA ELECTRONIC CORRESPONDENCE

MAY - 1 2013 In Reply Refer to: HFPP-15

Mr. Ananth Prasad

Secretary of Transportation

Florida Department of Transportation
605 Suwannee Street

Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450

Subject: _MAP-21 Access Program Programming Decisions Committee Members
Dear Mr. Prasad:

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141,
includes the establishment of the new Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP). This new
program will be administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Federal
Lands Highway. Florida is served by the Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD)
office in Sterling, Virginia.

A key requirement for implementing the FLAP is to coordinate the establishment of a three
member Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for programming the FLAP
funds allocated to each state. Each state level PDC consists of a representative from the Federal
Lands Highway Division office, the State Department of Transportation, and an organization or
entity that is suited to represent the local entities responsible for building, operating, or
maintaining transportation facilities that are located on, are adjacent to, or provide access to
Federal lands. Our program managers have coordinated with your department and have
identified the following positions that will fulfill the PDC requirement:

FLAP Program Manager, FHWA, EFLHD
Federal Aid Programs Manager, Florida Department of Transportation
Assistant Legislative Director, Florida Association of Counties


Additional information on the implementation of FLAP can be found on the FHWA MAP-21
website at http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/program/federal-lands-access.aspx. If you have any
questions, please contact Mr. David Payne at 571-434-1543 or David.Payne@dot.gov, or myself
at 703-404-6276 or Karen.Schmidt@dot.gov.

Sincerely yours,

Karen A. Schmidt
Director, Office of Program Administration

ce:

Mr. Eric Poole, Assistant Legislative Director, Florida Association of Counties, Tallahassee, FL

Mr. Sean McAuliff, Federal Aid Programs Manager, Florida Department of Transportation,
Tallahassee, FL

Mr. David Hawk, Division Administrator, FHWA, Florida Division Office, Tallahassee, FL
#### HARTMAN AUTO SALES, INC. v. JAYE.

No. 38332.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 214 So.2d 97.
255 La. 480

#### Succession of Ezra VINCENT.

No. 50369.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 27, 1970.

In re: Lou Bertha Lebine, Natural Tu-trix of Rita Nell Vincent, Minor applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 229 So.2d 449.

Writ refused. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct.