alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      22,555,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,179,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,804,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    62,000
<INVENTORY>                                    992,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,813,000
<PP&E>                                       2,294,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,186,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,313,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,398,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,907,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,313,000
<SALES>                                      6,611,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,611,000
<CGS>                                        2,863,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,863,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,015,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                28,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             332,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (9,206,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (9,219,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (9,219,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.12)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission to OMB for Review; Comment Request

October 2, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: New.
    Form Number: IRS Form 8853.
    Type of Review: New collection.
    Title: Medical Savings Accounts and Long-Term Care Services and 
Contracts.
    Description: This form is used by individuals to report general 
information about their medical savings accounts (MSAs), to figure 
their MSA deductions, and to figure their taxable distributions from 
MSAs. The form is also used to report taxable payments from long-term 
care (LTC) contracts.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 2,250,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recordkeeping..........................  1 hr., 6 min.                  
Learning about the law or the form.....  32 min.                        
Preparing the form.....................  1 hr., 14 min.                 
Copying, assembling, and sending the     20 min.                        
 form to the IRS.                                                       
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 3,877,500 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-27115 Filed 10-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Raymond E. VIEHBECK, as Administrator of the Estate of Sandra Viehbeck, deceased, and Raymond E. Viehbeck, individually, Plaintiffs, v. Louis HAUSHEER et al., Defendants.

No. 71-657.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 20, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 30, 1971.

Hawkesworth & Kay, Miami, for plaintiffs.

Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl and Edward J. Atkins, Miami, for defendants.

Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The answer to the questions propounded under F.A.R. 4.6, 32 F.S.A., is denied because the questions do not come within the limits enunciated by the Supreme Court in Schwob Company v. Florida Industrial Commission, 152 Fla. 203, 11 So.2d 782. See also Spaulding v. Fla. Gas Co., Fla.App.1971, 249 So.2d 695 [opinion filed First District June 24, 1971].
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARQUISE WALKER

- WOMACK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 350 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of November, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
Muldoon, Albert (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: KIM DEVORE <kim.devore@jpo-online.com> Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:59 AM EAS (OST); boonecountyairport@windstream.net Harrison 

## 't:e;r-

# CST-**\~{7- ;)93~** 

:' ;" ·:.

... :'' ...

I SUPPORT BOUTIQUE AIR'S PROPOSAL BECAUSE THE MODERN PRESSURIZED PILATUS AIRCRAFT WILL SAVE ME TIME AND OFFERA MORE COMFORTABLE RIDE WHEN I GO TO SEE MY RELATIVES IN DALLAS.

1
#### FAIRHAVEN PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant, v. TAMBERLANE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a non-profit Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-561.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied July 30, 1973.

*66Raymond W. Royce of Scott, Burk & Royce, Palm Beach, for appellant.

Daniel H. James of Hamilton, James, Merkle & Young, West Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

OWEN, J., dissents with opinion.

OWEN’, Judge

(dissenting).

This case presents a unique point of law which, on undisputed facts, I feel the trial court decided incorrectly.

The appellant developed a condominium but retained the recreational facilities which it leased to the plaintiff-appellee condominium association for a term of ninety-nine years. The recreational facilities under the lease consisted of a pool, recreation building and patio area. Some four years after the lease was entered into, a municipal ordinance was enacted which required the swimming pool to be enclosed by a safety barrier or a fence as a requisite to continued use. When the lessor refused to pay the cost thereof, the association had the fence installed at its expense and brought this suit for declaratory judgment and other relief. The only relief which the court granted to plaintiff was to award judgment for the reasonable cost of the fence.

The sole question is who, as between landlord and tenant, must bear the expense of alterations, improvements or repairs ordered by public authorities? This subject is annotated in 22 A.L.R.3d 521 and one may refer to that source for a collection of the reported causes dealing with this question.

The lease was entirely silent on the issue. However, when the other provisions of the ¡case are examined, it is abundantly clear that the parties intended for the rental to be “net” to the lessor. The lease required the lessee to bear the burden of maintenance and repair, to pay the cost of taxes and insurance, and to indemnify the lessor against any and all claims, debts, charges, costs, demands or obligations which might be made against lessor by reason of or in connection with the lease. When this factor is considered, in conjunction with the additional factors (1) that this was a ninety-nine year lease of which ninety-four years still remained, (2) that the required alterations to the demised premises were non-structural in nature, and (3) that only the lessee would ever receive any benefit therefrom, it seems totally logical that as a matter of law the expense thereof should fall upon the lessee.

I would reverse that portion of the judgment which required the lessor to pay for the cost of the fencing around the pool.
SCWC-12-0000995 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
BIG ISLAND TOYOTA, INC., a Hawai # i corporation; DAVID S. DE LUZ, SR. ENTERPRISES, INC., a Hawai # i corporation; and DAVID S. DE LUZ, SR., Petitioners/Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants/Appellees,

vs. VICTOR D. TREVINO, JR., Respondent/Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff/Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000995; CIV. NO. 06-1-373) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )

Petitioners/Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants/ Appellees’ Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on April 28, 2014, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 9, 2014. Paul M. Saito and Trisha L. Nishimoto for petitioners Victor D. Trevino, Jr., respondent pro se /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000995 09-JUN-2014 01:56 PM
- 1 -

Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

November 21, 2014

via email and regulations.gov

Brett Kruger

Acting Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Delta and Aeromexico

For BWI-CUN Service

Docket DOT-OST-2014-0191

Dear Mr. Kruger:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all of the carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the 

application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Brian Hedberg, DOT

 Bob Finamore, DOT

 info@airlineinfo.com
#### Mirtha MAS, Appellant, v. Fausto A. MAS, Appellee.

No. 73-431.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 25, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Goodrich Corporation Aerostructures Group Ken Bryan 850 Lagoon Drive Director of Sales - Asia Chula Vista, CA 91910 Aftermarket Services
Tel: 619-691-2409
Fax: 619-691-6195 Ken.bryan@goodrich.com www.goodrich.com

March 13, 2012

The Honorable Ray LaHood U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029.

Dear Secretary LaHood:

Goodrich Aerostructures fully supports the application of Alaska Airlines for air service between San Diego and Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). S an Diego is the largest region without announced
service to DCA. Additionally, due to the profound community of interest between San Diego and the nation’s capital, the region generates the la rgest passenger market demand without nonstop
service to the convenient and close- in airport serving our nation’s capital

.

San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupl ed with the fact that San Diego – Dulles average airfares are the highest of west coast cities should qualify it for a pair of the limited slots available. The high airfare is exacerbated when factoring in taxi fares fr om Dulles to Washington’s city center that average about $60 each way. This means travelers between Wash ington’s city center and San Diego via Dulles can pay on average close to $400 one-way.

There are also countless other San Diego-based and Washington-bas ed businesses that are engaged in health science, telecommunications, and national defense that need quick and convenient access to Reagan National Airport. Goodrich Aerostructur es has an immediate need for additional nonstop air service to our nation’s capital. Alaska Airlines service would add a needed nons top option to a primary gateway to Washington, DC. Goodric h Aerostructures joins with the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the San Di ego Regional Economic De velopment Corporation, the World Trade Center San Diego, and the San Diego Regional C hamber of Commerce in support of Alaska Airlines’ application for San Diego – Washington Reagan National slots.

We thank the Department of Transpor tation for the opportunity to co mment on the above referenced docket and we hope to hear of a favorable review of Al aska Airlines’ San Diego – DCA proposal soon. Yours sincerely,

Ken Bryan
Director of Sales
Goodrich Aerostructures
#### George Franklin VAUGHN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41183.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 27, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 247 So.2d 535.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
#### Leon WHITE v. STATE.

No. 38451.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
No. 9957.

#### The Upson Coal & Mining Co. *v.*Williams.

(Decided February 5, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Perry County.

*Mr. J. B. Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. T. D. Price*and *Messrs. Donahue & Spencer,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Omni
Insurance Group, Inc.'s December 31, 1996 financial statements and is qualifed
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000906786
<NAME> OMNI INSURANCE GROUP INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            79,043
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         212
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  84,519
<CASH>                                               0
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,549
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           9,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,223
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 33,177
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             49,723
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,223
<PREMIUMS>                                      90,880
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,081
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  40
<OTHER-INCOME>                                      25
<BENEFITS>                                      67,245
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     18,915
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             2,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,168
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,862
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  32,053
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             65,235
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                2,010
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              43,529
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                24,141
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 31,628
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          2,009
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                   Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

        Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Grupo Radio Centro, S.A. de C.V., a sociedad
anonima de capital variable organized under the laws of Mexico (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

        The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004 (the "Form 20-F") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  June 29, 2005                                    /s/ Carlos Aguirre Gomez
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Carlos Aguirre Gomez
                                                        General Director



Date:  June 29, 2005                                    /s/ Pedro Beltran Nasr
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Pedro Beltran Nasr
                                                        Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D.091797C]


Marine Mammals; Scientific Research Permit No. 878-1410

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Dr. Daniel F. Cowan, Professor of 
Pathology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 
77555-0555, has been issued a permit to import and export marine mammal 
specimens for scientific purposes.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment. (see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 7, 1997, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (62 FR 44251) that a request for a scientific 
research permit to import and export marine mammal specimen materials 
had been submitted by the above-named individual. The requested permit 
has been issued under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act 
of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and the Regulations 
Governing the Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216), 
the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the 
regulations governing the taking, importing and exporting of endangered 
fish and wildlife (50 CFR 222.23), and the Fur Seal Act of 1966 (16 
U.S.C. 1151 et seq.).
    Issuance of this permit as required by the ESA is based on a 
finding that such permit: (1) Was applied for in good faith: (2) Will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which are the 
subject of this permit: and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in Section 2 of the ESA.

Addresses:

    Documents are available in the following offices: Permits Division, 
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 
13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289);
    Northeast Region, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-
2289 (508/281-9250);
    Southeast Region, NMFS, 9721 Executive Center Drive North, St. 
Petersburg, FL 33702-2432 (813/570-5301);
    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213 (310/980-4001);
    Northwest Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE, BIN C15700, Bldg., 
1, Seattle, WA 98115-0070 (206/526-6150); and
    Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668 (907/
586-7221).

    Dated: October 8, 1997.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-27520 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### Edward Earl CALDWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-580.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 27, 1973.

Kramer & Telander, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Linda Hertz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant was informed against for unlawful sale of cannabis [Fla.Stat. § 404.02, F.S.A.], tried by jury, found guilty, and sentenced to three (3) years in the state penitentiary.

On appeal, appellant contends that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the conviction for sale of cannabis.

Contrary to appellant’s contention, after a review of the record on appeal we find that the evidence presented to the trial *28court was sufficient to sustain the conviction. Cf. Straub v. United States, 351 F.2d 304 (5th Cir. 1965) and Harris v. State, Fla.App.1969, 229 So.2d 670.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.