alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-182-008]


South Georgia Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes to 
FERC Gas Tariff

October 17, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 14, 1997, South Georgia Natural Gas 
Company (South Georgia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised Tariff 
sheets in compliance with the Commission's letter order issued on June 
24, 1997, in this docket, to become effective on November 1, 1997, 
except as otherwise noted:

Second Revised Sheet No. 13
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 15
First Revised Sheet No. 15a
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 16
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 32
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 33
Second Revised Sheet No. 45
Third Revised Sheet No. 46
Second Revised Sheet No. 98 (Effective August 1, 1997)
Third Revised Sheet No. 98
Original Sheet No. 98a

    On June 24, 1997, the Commission issued an unpublished letter order 
conditionally approving South Georgia's tariff filing made in this 
proceeding on May 1, 1997, to comply with Order No. 587-C in Docket No. 
RM96-1-000 which revised the Commission's regulations governing 
interstate natural gas pipelines to require such pipelines to follow 
certain standardized business practices issued by the Gas Industry 
Standards Board (GISB) and adopted by the Commission in said order. The 
letter order required South Georgia to make minor modifications to its 
May 1 filing and to submit in October 1997 actual tariff sheets to 
implement the GISB standards effective November 1, 1997. Accordingly, 
South Georgia submits the above-listed Tariff sheets to comply with 
this order.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures. All such protests must 
be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28052 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2767 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to update the resource limit 

for supplemental security income eligibility. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2023 

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. 

CASEY, and Mr. LANKFORD) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to update 

the resource limit for supplemental security income eligibility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SSI Savings Penalty 

5 Elimination Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UPDATE IN ELIGIBILITY FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL 

7 SECURITY INCOME PROGRAM. 

8 (a) UPDATE IN RESOURCE LIMIT FOR INDIVIDUALS

9 AND COUPLES.—Section 1611(a)(3) of such Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 1382(a)(3)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2767 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘$2,250’’ 

2 and all that follows through the end of the subpara3 graph and inserting ‘‘$20,000 in calendar year 

4 2023, and shall be increased as described in section 

5 1617(d) for each subsequent calendar year.’’; and 

6 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘$1,500’’ 

7 and all that follows through the end of the subpara8 graph and inserting ‘‘$10,000 in calendar year 

9 2023, and shall be increased as described in section 

10 1617(d) for each subsequent calendar year.’’. 

11 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Section 1617 of such 

12 Act (42 U.S.C. 1382f) is amended— 

13 (1) in the section heading, by inserting ‘‘; IN14 FLATION ADJUSTMENT’’ after ‘‘BENEFITS’’; and 

15 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(d) In the case of any calendar year after 2023, each 

17 of the amounts specified in section 1611(a)(3) shall be in18 creased by multiplying each such amount by the quotient 

19 (not less than 1) obtained by dividing— 

20 ‘‘(1) the average of the consumer price index 

21 for all urban consumers (all items; United States 

22 city average, as published by the Bureau of Labor 

23 Statistics of the Department of Labor) for the 12- 

24 month period ending with September of the pre25 ceding calendar year, by 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 2767 IS

1 ‘‘(2) such average for the 12-month period end2 ing with September 2022.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
# L_2005087EN.01000601.xml

| 6.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 87/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 87/6

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 524/2005 of 1 April 2005 fixing the definitive rate of refund and the percentage of system B export licences to be issued in the fruit and vegetables sector (tomatoes, oranges, lemons and apples)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 84 of 2 April 2005
  )

On page 13, in the Annex, in the second column ‘Rate of refund (EUR/t net)’, in the row entitled ‘Oranges’:

for:

‘24’,

read:

‘29’.

---
Order filed, January 28, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00779-CR

____________

MARCUS JAMEZ LEWIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1398109

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due January 22, 2015. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Gail Rolen, the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
TRAFFIC ALERT 

RELEASE: IMMEDIATE June 29, 2022 

CONTACT: Dan Weston – 703-948-3572 

Emergency/After Hours: 202-253-9942 

Route105BridgeInfo@dot.gov

 

FT. EUSTIS BLVD TRAFFIC UPDATE 

- Disruptions to Traffic as part of Ft. Eustis Blvd Bridge Replacement Project -

NEWPORT NEWS – To ensure motorist safety during VA Rt. 105 Eastbound entrance ramp 

work related to the Ft. Eustis Blvd. Bridge project, a full closure is scheduled to begin on July 

12th, 2022 ending approximately on September 30th, 2022. This will include a signed detour 

directing motorists traveling WB US Rt. 60 to VA Rt. 105 EB as the alternate route for travel to 

VA Rt. 105 EB and I-64 both East and Westbound directions. 

Motorists should be mindful of potential delays and consider alternate routes prior to reaching 

the closure. Work zone speed limits are 35 mph. 

The Ft. Eustis Blvd Bridge project will replace the existing aging bridge over the Lee Hall Dam 

Reservoir. The project began in August 2020 and the Westbound lanes were completed in early 

2022. Work is proceeding in the future Eastbound lanes of the new bridge from West to East. 

Current work focuses on placing girders, pouring bridge deck, and replacing the eastbound on 

ramp as part of the detour. The Eastbound lanes are scheduled to be completed in late 2022, 

allowing for final work to take place on the bridge approaches. The project is scheduled for 

completion in early 2023. 

Please visit https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/projects/va/flap-npnws-105-1 for traffic 

updates and other information on the Ft. Eustis Bridge Replacement. 

(END) 
                                                    

PROJECT PROGRESS PHOTOS, June 2022 

Concrete Bidwell being setup into place in preparation for scheduled concrete deck pour. (Facing East)

Placing Steel and tying rebar in preparation for scheduled deck pour. (Facing East)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3639 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3639

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2075 West Stadium Boulevard in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as the ``Robert 
                         Hayden Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT HAYDEN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2075 West Stadium Boulevard in Ann Arbor, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Robert Hayden Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert 
Hayden Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate April 23, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3639

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2075 West Stadium Boulevard in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as the ``Robert 
                         Hayden Post Office''.
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly report of Bio Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  August
20, 2009




By:
                /s/
      David KoosDavid
      KoosChief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bio
Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. and will be retained by Bio Matrix Scientific
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
# C

CAft1jIIrn



# (!!nuntg

ia1fl! IrpartmamtDIRECTORBOARDOFHEALTHBruceW.Dixon,M.D.AIRQUALITYPROGRAMPaulM.King,Esq.,Q..P.301Thirty-NinthStreetLeeHan-ison,M.D.Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania15201-1891Ch&r412-578-8103AlM.Ahmed,P.E.Rev.RiCkyV.Burgess.June222010JamesM.Flynn,Jr.AnnS.Frands,RN.Hon.JanReaLidiaC.Turzai,M.D.Mr.DaveArnold,ActingDirectorWilliamYoungbloodAirProtectionDivisionRegionifi(3APOO)U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1650ArchStreetPhiladelphia,PA19103-2029DearMr.Arnold:ThisistoinformyouthattheAlleghenyCountyHealthDepartmenthasforwardedtothePennsylvaniaDepartmentofEnvironmentalProtectionarevisiontoAlleghenyCounty’sportionofthePennsylvaniaStateImplementationPlanfortheAttainmentandMaintenanceofthe8-HourOzoneNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards.ChangesmadetoArticleXXI,AirPollutionControlRulesandRegulations,andCountyOrdinance16782arerelatedtoregulationsincorporatingCTGsforLargeApplianceandMetalFurnitureSurfaceCoatingProcesses,FlatWoodPanelingCoatingProcess,andPaper,Film,andFoilSurfaceCoatingProcesses-Sections2105.77,2105.78,and2105.79respectivelyaswellasrelateddefmitionsinSection2101.20andexistingSurfaceCoatingProcessesregulationsatSection2105.10.ThisSIPrevisionisbeingtrackedasourinternalRevision65.ThisSIPRevisionwasthesubjectofapubliccommentperiodfromOctober19,2009untilNovember20,2009thedateofthepublichearing.ItwasapprovedbytheBoardofHealthonMarch10,2010,enactedbyCountyCouncilonMay4,2010,approvedandsignedbytheAlleghenyCountyChiefExecutiveonMay14,2010,andbecameeffectiveMay24,2010.AsdirectedbyEPA,wearenotincludingthedocumentswiththisletter,sincewesubmitthemtothePennsylvaniaDEP,witharequestthattheyapprovetherevisionandforwardthedocumentstoEPAwitharecommendationofapproval.Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasecallmeatthenumberaboveoremailmeatjthompson@achd.net.Sincerel’./CamesThompson,ManagerAirQualityProgramcc:File24N-CS-0707
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40875

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

JUAN JOSE TORRES-LUCIO, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-223-ALL

--------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Jose Torres-Lucio appeals from his guilty-plea

conviction for illegal reentry following deportation. For the

first time on appeal, Torres-Lucio contends that the “felony” and

“aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are

unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000). As Torres-Lucio concedes, his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See

United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). 
No. 04-40875

-2-

Citing United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738, 756 (2005),

Torres-Lucio argues, also for the first time on appeal, that the

district court erred in sentencing him under a mandatory

sentencing guidelines scheme. He acknowledges that this argument

is reviewed for plain error. Nevertheless, Torres-Lucio contends

that he does not have to show that the district court’s error

affected his substantial rights because the error is structural

and because prejudice should be presumed.

Plain error is the correct standard of review. See United

States v. Malveaux, 411 F.3d 558, 560 (5th Cir. 2005), petition

for cert. filed (July 11, 2005) (No. 05-5297). The district

court committed error that is plain when it sentenced TorresLucio under a mandatory sentencing guidelines regime. See United

States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir. 2005),

petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556); United

States v. Martinez-Lugo, 411 F.3d 597, 600 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Torres-Lucio’s arguments that application of the mandatory

guidelines scheme is a “structural” error that is not susceptible

to plain-error analysis or, alternatively, that plain-error

prejudice should be presumed, lack merit. See Martinez-Lugo, 411

F.3d at 601. Torres-Lucio fails to meet his burden of showing

that the district court’s error affected his substantial rights. 

See Valenzeuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d at 733-34; see also United

States v. Bringier, 405 F.3d 310, 317 & n.4 (5th Cir. 2005),

petition for cert. filed (July 26, 2005) (No. 05-5535).

AFFIRMED.
# L_2005072EN.01001001.xml

| 18.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 72/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 72/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 439/2005

of 17 March 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 21st partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 21st partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 38,396 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

2

---
Confirmation on criteria for EPA to deem GHG permit application complete ?

Flajole, Andy to: Andrew Parks 08/10/2012 11:57 AM

Cc: "Foster, Stacy"

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded.

Hi Andrew,

Per my voicemail a few minutes ago, FPL is seeking confirmation on the criteria that will be used to

deem FPL’s GHG air permit application “complete”.  When last we spoke you stated that the EPA will

deem our GHG application “complete” via written correspondence upon a conclusion made by both EPA

(you) and NOAA (Audra) that the Biological Assessment contains all necessary information for the

agencies to make an effects determination on endangered species within the project action area.  My

management has requested written verification of this as it is so critical to our Port Everglades

modernization project schedule.

Please call me if you want to discuss.  I appreciate an email reply at your earliest convenience.

Thank You,

Andy Flajole

Environmental Services

(561) 691‐2766
259 La. 65

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Cleo ETHRIDGE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51525.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1971.

In re: Cleo Ethridge applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
Fifth Amendment of the Sky Financial Group, Inc. Non-Qualified Retirement Plan



Exhibit 10.20 
 
Exhibit A 
 
FIFTH AMENDMENT 
OF THE 
SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. NON-QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN 
(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1999) 
 
WHEREAS, Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains
the Sky Financial Group, Inc. Non-Qualified Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) for a select group of its management and highly compensated employees; 
 
WHEREAS, the Company has delegated authority to amend the Plan to the Sky Financial Group, Inc.
Benefit Plans Committee (the “Committee”), and the Committee has determined that amendment of the Plan is necessary and desirable. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power reserved to the Committee by Section 8.1 of the
Plan, and by virtue of the authority delegated to the undersigned by resolution of the Committee, the Plan, as previously amended, be and is hereby amended further, in the following particulars: 
 
1. By substituting “2.1” for “3.1” and
“2.2” for “3.2” in the first sentence of Section 2.3 of the Plan, effective as of January 1, 1999.  
 
2. By deleting the last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 2.3 of the Plan, effective as of November 13, 2002. 
 
3. By adding the following sentence to Section 6.2 of the
Plan, immediately after the second sentence thereof, effective as of July 1, 2002: 
 
“A Participant may also make a one-time election on or after his or her Employment Termination to change the manner in which his or her Account will be distributed in accordance with the
procedures established by the Committee.” 
 
*        *        * 







 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Committee member has executed this Plan amendment on behalf of the Committee, this 13th day of November, 2002. 
 

	 SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
BENEFIT PLANS COMMITTEE

	
	 By:
	 	  


	 	 	 A Member of the Committee



 

-2-