alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005110EN.01003501.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 110/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 110/35

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 691/2005

of 29 April 2005

concerning tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender for the export to certain third countries of wholly milled and medium and long grain A rice issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 14(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 14(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders submitted from 25 to 28 April 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the export refund on wholly milled rand, medium and long grain A rice to certain third European countries issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 353, 27.11.2004, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 61, 7.3.1975, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 18).

3

---
Exhibit 12.1

NTL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

|                                                                |  | Year ended December 31, |       
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------
|
|
|
|Fixed charges:                                                  |  |                         |       
|Interest                                                        |  | $                       | 673.6 
|Amortization of debt expense                                    |  |                         | 78.3  
|Interest portion of rental expense                              |  |                         | 28.0  
|                                                                |  |                         |       
|Fixed charges                                                   |  |                         | 779.9 
|Preferred stock dividend requirement                            |  |                         |      
|                                                                |  |                         |       
|Combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividend requirement |  | $                       | 779.9 
|                                                                |  |                         |       
|Earnings:                                                       |  |                         |       
|(Loss) from operations                                          |  | $                       | (954.1
|Fixed charges                                                   |  |                         | 779.9 
|Less: capitalized interest                                      |  |                         | (5.5  
|                                                                |  |                         |       
|                                                                |  | $                       | (179.7
|                                                                |  |                         |       
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(2)                           |  |                         |       
|Deficiency                                                      |  |                         | (959.6

The
ratio of earnings to fixed charges and combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends is not meaningful for the periods that result in a deficit.

---

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report
of SES Solar Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Sandrine Crisafulli,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1.
              The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and




2.
              The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




Date: August 14,
      2009
                By:
                /s/ SANDRINE
      CRISAFULLISandrine
      CrisafulliChief Financial
      Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHARLES MICHAEL HENRY,

Appellant,

v.

CHEYENNE M. HENRY,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1789

[November 9, 2017]

Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. 

Case No. 2016DR006077.

Charles Michael Henry, Lake Worth, pro se.

Scott M. Weiss of Weiner & Weiss, LLC, Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report of SES Solar Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB for the three-month period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
        “Report”), I, Jean-Christophe Hadorn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
        certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  Date:
                  May 21, 2007
              By:
              /s/
                  JEAN-CHRISTOPHE HADORNJean-Christophe
                  Hadorn
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
 A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
          document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
          that
          appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
          required by Section 906, has been provided to SES Solar Inc. and will
          be retained by SES Solar Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
          Commission or its staff upon request.
#### SUN INSURANCE OFFICE, LTD., Appellant, v. Jeanette NOEL, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 70-1147.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 25, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-77648) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan of Cygne
Designs, Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77650)
pertaining to the Stock Option Plan for non-employee Directors of Cygne Designs,
Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2001 with respect to the consolidated
Financial Statements and schedule of Cygne Designs, Inc. and Subsidiaries,
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended February 3, 2001
of Cygne Designs, Inc.

                                                     ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
April 30, 2001
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19- 0708 IN THE MATTER OF: J.A.L., Respondent and Appellant . ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 11 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 3 2020

04/03/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0708
# L_2005039EN.01003501.xml

| 11.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 39/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 39/35

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 228/2005

of 10 February 2005

correcting Regulation (EC) No 115/2005 opening an invitation to tender for the refund on common wheat exports to certain third countries

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 115/2005 (2) opened an invitation to tender for the refund on common wheat exports to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 115/2005 (2) opened an invitation to tender for the refund on common wheat exports to certain third countries.

| (2) | A check has shown that as a result of an error the above Regulation does not correspond to the measures that were subject to a favourable vote in the Management Committee concerning the countries to be excluded from the tender. The Regulation in question should therefore be corrected, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A check has shown that as a result of an error the above Regulation does not correspond to the measures that were subject to a favourable vote in the Management Committee concerning the countries to be excluded from the tender. The Regulation in question should therefore be corrected,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 115/2005 shall be replaced by the following:

‘2.   The invitation to tender covers common wheat for exportation to destinations with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro (*1), and Switzerland.’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 24, 27.1.2005, p. 3.

2

---
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2008-0614 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2007-NM-351-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Via Vid Broadcasting Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Brian
Kathler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Brian Kathler
-----------------



Brian Kathler
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002








                                       35
#### Otis BROWN, Jr. v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 45863.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 25, 1970.

Rehearing Denied July 2, 1970.

Alix H. Sanders, Greenwood, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Guy N. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John M. Kinard, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77648) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan of Cygne Designs, Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77650) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors ofCygne Designs, Inc. of our report dated April 10, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Cygne Designs, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in The Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended February 1, 2003.

 

/S/    MAHONEY COHEN & COMPANY, CPA, P.C. 

 

 

New York, New York 

April 30, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2824]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

Indian Gaming; Notice of Approved Tribal/State Compact

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. Sec. 2710, of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-497), the Secretary of the Interior 
shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal/State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III (casino) gambling on 
Indian reservations. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through her delegated authority, has 
approved the Tribal/State Gaming Compact between the Iowa Tribe and the 
State of Oklahoma, which was executed on December 5, 1996.

DATES: This action is effective Febraury 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Indian 
Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C. 
20240, (202) 219-4068.

    Dated: January 29, 1997.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-2824 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
#### Bobby Gene DRIGGERS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44257.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 23, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 280 So.2d 739.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Archie ROLLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-448.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 2, 1973.

Archie Rolle, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time with*24in which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having' failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
* Judge Hamilton did not participate in consideration of this

case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1287

KERRY C. CHIDEBE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA96-3169-CCB)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 21, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON,* Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kerry C. Chidebe, Appellant Pro Se. Emmett Francis McGee, Jr.,

Theresa M. Connolly, PIPER & MARBURY, Baltimore, Maryland; Harvey

D. Rumeld, MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Washington, D.C., for

Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court’s order granting

summary judgment in her civil action alleging violations of the

Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 2601-2654 (West Supp.

1998), and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A.

§§ 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Chidebe v. MCI Telecommunications Corp., No. CA-96-3169-CCB

(D. Md. Jan. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28


September  24, 2002

Mr. Robert Smith
125 Lakeview Drive

Woodside, CA  94062-1124

Dear Bob:

Congratulations on your retirement as an officer of Novellus effective September
30, 2002. While you will continue as an employee advisor to the Company over the
next several years, it will not be at the hectic pace of the last five years.

As you and I discussed, you will receive a one time bonus payment of $325,000 on
October 1, 2002. In addition, you will go to one half salary ($162,500
annualized) from October 1, 2002 until September 30, 2003, at which time you
will further reduce to one quarter salary ($81,250 annualized) from October 1,
2003 until September 30, 2004. Beginning October 1, 2004 your salary will be
reduced to $40,625 until September 30, 2006 at which time all payments from
Novellus will cease.

Your participation in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan via after-tax payroll
deductions will continue until September 30, 2006, unless you choose to stop
your contributions and withdraw from the Plan. Your outstanding unvested stock
options will immediately vest as of September 30, 2002. You may exercise your
Company stock options until September 30, 2006. After September 30, 2006, all
vested stock options will lapse if not exercised within ninety (90) days.

Novellus will continue to pay one hundred percent of the cost of your medical,
dental, vision, life and long term disability insurance coverage and a portion
for your dependents during this entire period. Your pre-tax payroll deductions
for your share in the cost of dependent coverage must continue in order to
maintain coverage for them. The life insurance benefit would be paid to your
beneficiary at 2x the rate of your current salary. That means if your salary was
$40,625 it would pay the maximum benefit allowed of $81,250. After September 30,
2006 you will be eligible to convert your life insurance coverage to an
individual policy.

After September 30, 2006 you will also be eligible to convert certain benefits
including your medical, dental, and vision insurance coverage under COBRA for up
to 18 months, and will be provided with information describing this conversion
election at that time. Except for the terms outlined in this letter, you will
not be entitled to any compensation, benefits or other perquisites of employment
after September 30, 2006.

It has been enjoyable working with you over the last five years. You have made
many lasting contributions to the company that will always be appreciated. You
have had a lasting effect on the company and the people with whom you have
worked and we look forward to continuing to work with you over the next four
years.

Sincerely,

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.


Richard S. Hill
Chairman and CEO

Cc:   Novellus Board of Directors
      Novellus Human Resources Department
#### Warren George CAMPBELL, a minor, et al., Appellants, v. Bert FRIEDMAN and Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 71-352.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.