alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### RIPLEY SHOE PRODUCTS and the Home Insurance Company v. Charles Leroy CHILDERS.

No. 49783.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 7, 1977.

Mitchell, McNutt, Bush, Lagrone *&*Sams, Wade H. Lagrone, Jack R. Reed, Jr., Tupe-lo, for appellants.

Farese, Farese & Farese, John Booth Farese, Ashland, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tippah County; W. W. Brown, Judge.

Before INZER, P. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Selected Data on Foreign Direct Investment in the United States, 1950-79

              																	United States. Department of Commerce					 and 	United States. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 						*Selected Data on Foreign Direct Investment in the United States, 1950-79*,										December 1984,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/338,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 9, 2008 |                                                                              |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | /s/ SAL      PERISANO           |   |
|                   | Sal      Perisano                                                                 |   |
|                   | Chief      Executive Officer                                                      |   |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27249]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New York Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the New York Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 9:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, October 29, 1997, at the 
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Regional Office, Conference 
Room, 7 World Trade Center, New York, New York 10048. The purpose of 
the meeting is to plan future events and discuss progress of the 
Committee report on section 8 housing programs. The Committee will also 
hold a 4-hour briefing, starting at 1:00 p.m., on police-community 
relations in New York City by representatives from law enforcement, 
city government, community groups, and civil rights organizations.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson L. D. Taracido, 
212-645-8999, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, 
202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who will 
attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, October 3, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-27249 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



             PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 1350
                            (furnished but not filed)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ViaVid Broadcasting, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian
Kathler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Brian Kathler
    -------------




Brian Kathler
Chief Executive Officer
June 24, 2005
AEE-13-132-E

February 19, 2013

 Exemption No. 10710

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2003-15405

Mr. Steve Boyce

Director of Maintenance

Aero Air, LLC

2050 NE 25th Avenue

Hillsboro, OR 97124

Dear Mr. Boyce:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to amend Exemption No. 9463, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

On November 5, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf 

of Aero Air, LLC dba Erickson Aero Tanker (Aero) for an amendment to Exemption No. 

9463, as amended. That exemption from § 36.1581(d) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations allows Butler Aircraft Company to operate its Douglas DC-6 and Douglas DC-7 

aircraft in aerial fire suppression operations at landing weights greater than the maximum 

landing weight for the aircraft in Butler’s operating limitations and up to the aircraft’s design 

maximum landing weight.

The amendment you request would change the company name from Butler Aircraft Company 

to Aero Air, LLC. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register. The requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Aero Air, LLC.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9463, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption. Therefore, pursuant to the authority 

contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, Exemption 

No. 9463 is hereby granted.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision to amend Exemption No. 9463, as amended, is hereby granted by changing the 

company name identified on the exemption to Aero Air, LLC. The exemption allows Aero 

Air, LLC to operate its Douglas DC-6 and Douglas DC-7 aircraft in aerial fire suppression 

operations at landing weights greater than the maximum landing weight for the aircraft in its 

operating limitations and up to the aircraft’s design maximum landing weight. 

This exemption covers only firefighting operations under contracts to U. S. Government and 

state agencies. The exemption applies to aircraft identified as N401US (DC-7), N6353C (DC7), N6318C (DC-7), N756Z (DC-7BF), N8502R (DC-54E), N90739 (DC-6), and N838D 

(DC-7B).

This exemption is effective immediately and remains valid unless superseded or rescinded. 

This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9463.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lourdes Maurice

Executive Director, Environment and

 Energy
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130531 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130531 COA: 267055 Genesee CC: 04-013581-FC JIMMY RAY MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the January 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gary S. Hirstein, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International FuelTechnology, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructionscontained in SEC Release 34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date: November 13, 2006         By: /s/ Gary S. Hirstein       Gary S. Hirstein      Executive Vice President,      Chief Financial Officer and
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-33-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

October 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 16, 1997, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National Fuel), 10 Lafayette Square, Buffalo, New York 
14203, filed in Docket No. CP98-33-000 a request pursuant to Section 
157.205 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.205) for authorization to construct and operate a new 
residential sales tap on its Line N-W4913 (S) in Mercer County, 
Pennsylvania, for the delivery of natural gas to National Fuel Gas 
Distribution Corporation (Distribution), under National Fuel's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-4-000 pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request which 
is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    National Fuel states that the estimated volumes to be delivered to 
Distribution would be approximately 150 Mcf on an annual basis.
    National Fuel states further that the estimated cost to install the 
sales tap would be $1,500, for which National Fuel would be reimbursed 
by Distribution.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28334 Filed 10-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Form FHWA 4260 (11/19) 

Replaces Form DOT 4260

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Form 4260: Section 508 Information and Communication 

Technology (ICT) Conformance Criteria

Conformance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act and the ICT Final Standards and Guidelines (508 Refresh) at 

36 CFR Part 1194 is a statutory requirement applicable to all ICT the FHWA procures, develops, maintains, or uses. 

In addition to the work requirements specified in this statement of work, vendors must ensure that all ICT that they 

prepare will meet these requirements. 

The FHWA has defined the following standardized criteria to ensure its ICT conforms to the current Section 508 

Refresh standards.

ICT includes, but is not limited to: electronic documents, software, websites, video and audio files, multifunction office 

machines, computers, and telecommunications equipment. This includes electronic content the agency procures, 

develops, maintains, or uses.

Terms

The following conditions apply to this form:

• If the Contractor is required to provide a Section 508 conformant product, conformance will be evaluated against 

the criteria in this form. By submitting a product for 508 review, the Contractor understands the conformance 

criteria.

• The form does not need to be completed when submitting a deliverable. 

• The Contractor shall correct non-conformant deliverables at no additional cost to the Government or 

extension to the contract. 

• The program office has 45 days after receipt of the deliverable or end of the contract performance 

period, whichever is later, to notify the contractor of non-conformance. If not done within this 

timeframe, the program office will be required to remedy by using their office’s resources.

• All defects must be corrected within 30 days after contractor’s receipt of the Government’s notice 

of nonconformance.

• Failure to remedy the nonconformant deliverables within the required timeline may result in 

negative past performance reviews, termination for cause and/or withholding payment as 

determined by the Agency. 

Reminders:

• Any ICT certified by the contractor/awardee as conformant but is determined by FHWA to be nonconformant may 

violate the False Claims Act. 

• Misrepresentation of ICT accessibility or failure to provide ICT products or services that meet the proposed and 

accepted level of conformance specified is not acceptable. It may result in termination for cause or withholding 

payment as determined by the Agency.

• The Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)/Agreement Officer’s Representative (AOR) or Technical 

Point of Contact (TPOC) as designated by the award cannot knowingly accept nonconformant Section 508

deliverables. Inspection and acceptance of deliverables is a duty of the COR, AOR, TPOC. Knowingly accepting 

services that do not meet the contract requirements can be perceived as a constructive change to the contract.
Searched for **http://www.foodsafety.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.foodsafety.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                   APPLIEDTHEORY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                  CALCULATION OF LOSS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED) (1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2001
                                                                          ------------------
<S>                                                                       <C>
          Weighted average shares outstanding:
          Common stock:
                 Shares outstanding at beginning of period                     27,555,238
                 Weighted average shares issued during three months
                 ended September 30, 2001 (1,131,916 shares)                      771,945
                                                                             ------------
                                                                               28,327,183
                                                                             ============
          Net loss                                                           $(11,221,000)
                                                                             ============

          Loss per share attributable to common stockholders                 $      (0.40)
                                                                             ============
</TABLE>

----------
(1)      For a discussion of loss per share, see Note D of the Notes to the
         Financial Statements provided in Part I, Item 1 of our Form 10-Q for
         the period ended September 30, 2001.


                                       48
# L_2005199EN.01009601.xml

| 29.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 199/96 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 199/96

---

COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2005/585/CFSP

of 28 July 2005

extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for Afghanistan

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 14, 18(5) and 23(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 8 December 2003 the Council adopted Joint Action 2003/871/CFSP (1) extending and amending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union in Afghanistan. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 8 December 2003 the Council adopted Joint Action 2003/871/CFSP (1) extending and amending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union in Afghanistan.

| (2) | On 2 February 2005 the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/95/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union until 31 August 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 2 February 2005 the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/95/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union until 31 August 2005.

| (3) | On the basis of a review of Joint Action 2003/871/CFSP the mandate of the European Union Special Representative should be extended for a further 6 months. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of a review of Joint Action 2003/871/CFSP the mandate of the European Union Special Representative should be extended for a further 6 months.

| (4) | The European Union Special Representative will implement his mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy as set out in Article 11 of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The European Union Special Representative will implement his mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy as set out in Article 11 of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

The mandate of Mr Francesc VENDRELL as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for Afghanistan is hereby extended until 28 February 2006.

Article 2

Article 5(1) of Joint Action 2003/871/CFSP shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR shall be EUR 620 000.’

Article 3

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Article 4

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 July 2005.

For the Council

The President

J. STRAW

---

(1)  
  OJ L 326, 13.12.2003, p. 41.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 31, 4.2.2005, p. 69.

2

---