alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.1

                           MARYLAND PROCUREMENT OFFICE
                                9800 SAVAGE ROAD
                    FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-5720

IN REPLY REFER TO                                     Serial No.:  DA341-0274-03
MPO-DA341-DAY                                         Date:  17 July 2003

SSP Solutions, Inc.
Attn  Mr. Kris Shah
17861 Cartwright Road
Irvine, CA 92614

REFERENCE  [CONTRACT NUMBER]

SUBJECT:  DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION - CONTRACT

         Documents and information provided to your Company by the Maryland
Procurement Office, to include, any contract pursuant to which you perform work
for and provide products to this organization, under the terms of the contract
and the applicable Department of Defense Federal Acquisition Supplement (DFAR)
clauses, cannot be disclosed. This requirement on non-disclosure of any
information also pertains to contract sponsorship as well as the nature of the
Government's interest in and application of the subject matter of the contract.
This lack of disclosure also applies to any SSP registration statements, proxy
statements, prospectus, notifications, declarations, statements, applications or
reports of other documents.

         Should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at
410/854-4074 or FAX at 410/854-4455 or 854-4620.

                                           /s/ Deborah A. Young
                                           DEBORAH A. YOUNG
                                           Contracting Officer

cc: Mr. James S. Prohaska, SSP Litronic
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Nautilus, Inc., a Washington corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

To my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                   
|--------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 16, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Edward J. Bramson                                             
|Date            |  |  |  |     |  | Edward J. Bramson                                                 
|                |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                |  |  |  |     |  |                                                      
|--------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|August 16, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Kenneth L. Fish                                  
|Date            |  |  |  |     |  | Kenneth L. Fish                                      
|                |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)



27
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-34362); on Form S-8 (File No. 333-04373, No. 333-17493, No. 333-71354, and No. 333-114359); and on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-71076 and 333-126510) of OpticalSensors Incorporated d/b/a väsamed of our report dated March 1, 2006 (except as to Note 18, as to which the date is March 20, 2006), which appears on page 25 of this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

March 30, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993 Semiconductor Research Corporation

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 1997, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Semiconductor 
Research Corporation (``SRC'') filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, FLIPCHIP Technologies, L.L.C., Phoenix, AZ 
has become an Affiliate Member and Dawn Technology, Mountain View, CA; 
Ibis Technology, Danvers, MA; Hestia Technology, Sunnyvale, CA; OEA 
International, Santa Clara, CA; and Tyecin Systems, Los Altos, CA are 
no longer members.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership, corporate 
name, or planned activities of this group research project. Membership 
in the project remains open, and Semiconductor Research Corporation 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On January 7, 1985, the Semiconductor Research Corporation filed 
its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 30, 1985 (50 FR 4281). 
The last notification was filed with the Department on June 11, 1997. A 
notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act on August 4, 1997 (62 FR 41976).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-28952 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# L_2006061DE.01002301.xml

| 2.3.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 61/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 61/23

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 111/2005 des Rates vom 22. Dezember 2004 zur Festlegung von Vorschriften für die Überwachung des Handels mit Drogenaustauschstoffen zwischen der Gemeinschaft und Drittländern

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 22 vom 26. Januar 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 22 vom 26. Januar 2005

Deckblatt und Seite 1, Titel:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. OA96-15-004]


Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc.; Notice of Filing

October 16, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 15, 1997, Central Louisiana Electric 
Company, Inc., tendered for filing its compliance filing in the above-
referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regualtory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before October 27, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27917 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1234567

CFLHD prepares meeting

materials and notifies

appropriate individuals ofPDC meeting

CFLHD prepares project call

packet, updates website

CFLHD compiles all project

applications and distributesto members of the PDC for

ranking

CFLHD prepares summary

sheet and map of all projects

for PDC and FLMA partners

CFLHD notifies short‐list of

projects and signs

preliminary projectagreement with project

sponsor(14 days)

FLMAs engage state and

local facility owners to

identify projects

Technical Advisory Group(TAG):(1) Rank top FLMA related

applications (ex: USFWS

ranks all USFWS projects in

state)(2) Group all applications

received in the state as

"highly qualified", "qualified"

or "minimally qualified"(14 days)

PDC Kick‐Off Meeting

PDC finalizes project

selection criteria and call

packet

PDC scores and ranksapplications(30 days)

PDC prioritizes preliminaryprogram of projects

PDC approves any FLMA

projects to bridge into

Access Program

Selected projects sign projectagreement to proceed with

scoping

Notes: This diagram is subject to change based on the needs, funding availability, and staff/PDC time constraints.

"Level 2" applies to the following states: AZ, CA, CO, NV, NM, UT, and WY.

Scoping may not be applicable for all projects.

Technical Advisory Group (TAG) is comprised of a member of all related Federal Lands in the state.

When the number of days is indicated, it refers to calendar days.

FLMA is an abbreviation for Federal Lands Management Agency.

PDC is an abbreviation for Programming Decisions Committee.

For guidance on the program, see: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/guidance/guideflap.cfm

For information on CFLHD's roll‐out of the program, see: www.cflhd.gov/programs/flap/

CFLHD

Central Federal Lands Highway Division ‐ Access Program Project Selection Process ‐ Level 2 States

Applications prepared and submitted

PDC

Activities

FLMA

FLMA's (1) Notify local entities and State DOTs to submit

projects(2) FLMA provides initial acknowledgement on application

materials (signature page)

Call for Projects (60 days)

Month

CFLHD scopes short list of projects

(60 days)

Applicants

CFLHD Issues Call for Projects(60 days)
Exhibit 8.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                              --------------------

The following is a list of the Company's significant subsidiaries, all of which
were organized in Mexico:

RADIO STATIONS:
--------------

XEQR, S.A. de C.V.

XERC, S.A. de C.V.

XEEST, S.A. de C.V.

XEQR-FM, S.A. de C.V.

XERC-FM, S.A. de C.V.

XEJP-FM, S.A. de C.V.

XEDKR-AM, S.A. de C.V.

Radio Red, S.A. de C.V.

Radio Red-FM, S.A. de C.V.

Radio Sistema Mexicano, S.A.

Estacion Alfa, S.A. de C.V.

Emisora 1150, S.A. de C.V.


MARKETING COMPANIES:
-------------------

Radio Centro Publicidad, S.A. de C.V.

GRC Publicidad, S.A. de C.V.

GRC Medios, S.A. de C.V.


SERVICE COMPANIES:
------------------

Promotora Tecnica de Servicios Profesionales, S.A. de C.V.

Publicidad y Promociones Internacionales, S.A. de C.V.

Promo Red, S.A. de C.V.

GRC Radiodifusion, S.A.

<PAGE>

REAL ESTATE COMPANIES:
----------------------

Universal de Muebles e Inmuebles, S.A. de C.V.

Inmobiliaria Radio Centro, S.A. de C.V.


SUB-HOLDING COMPANIES:
---------------------

Desarrollos Empresariales, S.A. de C.V.

Radiodifusion Red, S.A. de C.V.

Enlaces Troncales, S.A. de C.V.

                                        2
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Johnny B. WRIGHT.

No. 61673.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 1978.

Paul J. Carmouche, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John A. Richardson, Dist. Atty., Tommy J. Johnson, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was charged by bill of information with simple kidnapping. La. R.S. 14:45. After trial by a six person jury the defendant was found guilty as charged and later sentenced as a multiple offender to serve seven years at hard labor. On appeal the defendant relies upon seven assignments of error.

We have reviewed the record and find no merit in the defendant’s assignments of error. Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

SUMMERS, J., concurs.
U.S. Department 

Of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration

400 Seventh St., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

April 25, 1995 

Refer to: HNG-14/SS-17B 

Mr. Tauhid Husain 

Product Manager 

Transpo Industries, Inc. 

20 Jones Street 

New Rochelle, New York 10801-6024 

Dear Mr. Husain: 

In our March 7 letter to you we accepted the Transpo “Type A” Break-Safe sign support 

system for use with square steel tubes. During a telephone conversation with Mr. 

Nicholas Artimovich of my office you asked why we limited our acceptance to a single 

support within a 2.1-meter span. You cited on January 8, 1990, letter, which previously 

accepted dual supports on Type A couplings. The Type A couplings were tested twice 

using a pendulum, first with a standard structural shape and then with a back-to-back uchannel post, with acceptable results. Because the results were so favorable we extended 

acceptance of all of the tested couplers to permit two posts within the 2.1-meter span. 

During the testing of small and large sing supports study that ended in 1992, we saw 

some failures of multiple post supports that had been thought to be crashworthy. Since 

your original request did not specify the number of posts in a support system for which 

you sought acceptance we put the condition in our March 7 letter limiting the use of Type 

A couplings with square tube supports to no more than one within a 2.1-meter span. 

Upon further review we have concluded that the square tube supports will perform as 

well as, if not better than, the wide-flange and back-to-back u-channel posts that were 

previously accepted. Therefore, consistent with our 1990 acceptance of Type A 

couplings within a 2.1-meter span, two square steel tube sign supports mounted on your 

company’s Type A couplings will be acceptable for use on the National Highway System 

if requested by a State. The other conditions contained in our March 7 letter are still 

applicable. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 Jerry L. Poston, Chief 
 Federal-Aid and Design Division 

Additional Supplement to Geometric and Roadside Design Acceptance Letter Number 

SS-17
#### Enrique BEHAR, Appellant, v. Joseph ZALMANOFF et ux., Appellees.

No. 77-968.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 30, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 1978.

Allen Kornblum, Miami, for appellant.

I.R. Mayers, Miami, for appellees.

Before HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL, (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Procacci v. Zacco,*324 So.2d 180 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *Hanna v. Means,*319 So.2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); *Reyes v. Perez,*284 So.2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).
### Compilation of records of surface waters of the United States, October 1950 to September 1960: Part 2-B. South Atlantic slope and eastern Gulf of Mexico basins, Ogeechee River to Pearl River

By: E. L. HendricksA. N. CameronL.E. CarroonF. N. HansenA. O. PattersonW.H. Robinson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1724

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

NH-07 Errol Embankment Stabilization

Construction of 

Embankment 

Stabilization

US Fish and Wildlife 

Service - Umbagog NWR

NH Department 

of Transportation Coos

2017-

2018

NH-08 Pondicherry Access Bicycle/Pedestrian 

Facility Improvements

US Fish and Wildlife 

Service - Silvio O. Conte 

NWR

State of NH Trails 

Bureau

Coos 2018

NH-11 Passaconaway Road Geotechnical 

Study/Slope Stabilization

US Forest Service - White 

Mountain National Forest Town of Albany Carroll 2020 - 2021

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the New Hampshire Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its 

multiyear Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the New Hampshire FLAP are listed below in no particular order and 

New Hampshire Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2017-2022

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The New Hampshire PDC does not have a firm date for the next Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please watch our website for updates in 

your state. https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/programs-access

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
9

_________________________________________________________________________________________

1920 Ballenger Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-2898 Telephone: (703) 683-4646 Fax: (703) 683-4745

Dedicated to the advancement of the international helicopter community

www.rotor.org

July 16, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building Ground Floor

Room W 12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Filed Via Regulations.gov

Re: Petition for Extension of Exemption: Exemption No. 6175I, Docket No. FAA-2001-9195

Dear Mr. Administrator;

On September 29, 1995, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted Exemption No. 6175 to 

Helicopter Association International (HAI) and the Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) (“the 

Petitioners”). This exemption, from 14 CFR § 135.213(a), was granted “to the limited extent 

necessary to permit helicopter EMS departures, under IFR, in weather that is at or above VFR 

minimums, from airports or heliports at which a weather report is not available from the U.S. National 

Weather Service, a source approved by the NWS, or a source approved by the Administrator,” subject 

to certain conditions and limitations.

On June 17, 1997, August 29, 2000, August 23, 2001, June 6, 2003, June 22, 2005, September 12, 

2007, July 30, 2009, and August 26, 2013, Exemption No. 6175 was extended; Exemption No.6175 

will expire by its own terms on September 30, 2015.

The conditions and circumstances pursuant to which Exemption No. 6175 was originally granted 

remain unchanged. Experience with Exemption No. 6175 demonstrates that the public interest is 

served and a level of safety equivalent to the regulation is maintained when properly trained air 

medical service pilots are permitted to perform air medical services (EMS) departures, under IFR, in 

weather that is at or above VFR minimums, from airports or heliports at which a weather report is not 

available. From the U.S. Weather Service, a source approved by the NWS, or a source approved by the 

Administrator.
Dedicated to the advancement of the international helicopter community.

Pursuant to 14 CFR §11.25, good cause exists to waive publication of this petition for extension of 

exemption in the Federal Register, because the extension , if granted, would not set a precedent, and 

any delay in acting on this petition would be a detriment to the Petitioners and the public.

Therefore, HAI and AAMS petition the Administrator to extend Exemption No. 6175 for an additional 

two year term, or for such longer term as the Administrator may deem appropriate. The Petitioners 

further ask the Administrator to find that good cause exists to waive publication. Questions or 

comments concerning this petition for extension of exemption may be directed to the undersigned or to 

David York, Vice President of Regulations and International Affairs, HAI, at the address above. 

 

Sincerely,

Matthew S. Zuccaro

President & COO

cc: Mr. Rick Sherlock, President and CEO, AAMS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,150,982
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,153,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        331,109
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     96,171
<COMMON>                                       604,398
<OTHER-SE>                                    (48,759)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,153,907
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,254
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   93,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 44,734
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,734
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
        

</TABLE>