alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                             MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION
                    (FORMERLY WASHINGTON CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.)

                            SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Consolidated subsidiaries of the registrant,
Morrison Knudsen Corporation (Delaware)

                                       STATE OR COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
                                       ---------------------------------

Atascosa Mining Co.                                   Nevada
Blue Diamond Materials, Inc.                          Nevada
Centennial Engineering, Inc.                          Colorado
CF Systems Corporation                                Massachusetts
Conda Mining, Inc.                                    Idaho
Industrial Contractors Corporation                    Montana
Kasler Corporation                                    California
MK Ferguson of Oak Ridge Company                      Tennessee
Morrison Knudsen Corporation                          Ohio
Morrison Knudsen Deutschland GmbH                     Germany
National Projects, Inc.                               Nevada
Pomeroy Corporation                                   California
Washington Construction Company                       Montana
Washington Contractors Group, Inc.                    Montana

The names of particular subsidiaries have been excluded because when considered
in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, as of November 30, 1996, they would not
constitute a significant subsidiary under Rule 1-02 of Regulation S-X.
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


Board of Directors
Starcraft Corporation and Subsidiaries
Goshen, Indiana


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 No.  33-73148)  pertaining  to the  Starcraft  Automotive  Corporation
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust,  in the  Registration  Statement (Form S-8
No. 33-70030) pertaining to the Starcraft Automotive Corporation Stock Incentive
Plan, in the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  333-28247  and  333-30052)
pertaining to the Starcraft  Corporation  1997 Stock  Incentive  Plan and in the
Registration  Statement (Form S-2 No. 333-96989)  pertaining to shares of common
stock issued upon  exercise of certain  warrants and options of our report dated
November 22, 2002,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of
Starcraft  Corporation and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K
as amended)  for the years ended  September  29,  2002,  September  30, 2001 and
October 1, 2000.


                                             /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                             Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Elkhart, Indiana
December 23, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27909]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-18-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company, Notice of Request under Blanket 
Authorization

October 16, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 9, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch Gateway), P.O. Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77251-1478, filed in 
Docket No. CP98-18-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205, 157.211, 
and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.211, 157.216) for authorization to establish three 
new delivery taps and to abandon eight delivery taps, located in St. 
Tammany Parish, Louisiana, under Koch Gateway's blanket certificate 
issued in Docket No. CP82-430-000, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the 
Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is on 
file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Kock Gateway proposes to install three new delivery taps and minor 
piping, located in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, to tie over certain 
taps to its adjacent pipeline facilities, Index 300, or to the 
facilities of a local distribution company, Entex, Inc. (Entex). Koch 
Gateway also proposes to abandon eight farm taps by plugging and 
removing all valves and above-ground facilities on its Index 276 
facilities, also in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana. Koch Gateway states 
that these taps are used for delivery of natural gas to end-users on 
behalf of Entex. Koch Gateway asserts service will be continued to the 
affected end-users through new taps on an adjacent Koch Gateway 
pipeline. Koch Gateway declares that Entex concurs with the proposed 
abandonment and tie-over measures.
    Kock Gateway states that the purchaser of Index 276, Koch Pipeline, 
Inc., a subsidiary of Koch Industries, will reimburse them for the cost 
of the proposed construction and abandonment activities, estimated to 
be $44,644.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27909 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NO. 12-17-00088-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

MICHAEL KENNEDY, 

RELATOR

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Relator, Michael Kennedy, has filed this original proceeding, in which he presents 

multiple arguments that all arise out of his criminal conviction in trial court cause number 29326. 

Relator’s conviction has been final for several years, and cause number 29326 is not currently 

pending in the trial court. See Kennedy v. State, No. 12–11–00041–CR, 2012 WL 3201924, at 

*8 (Tex. App.–Tyler Aug. 8, 2012, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) 

(affirming judgment on punishment); see also Kennedy v. State, No. 12–08–00246–CR, 2009 

WL 4829989, at *3–4 (Tex. App.–Tyler Dec. 16, 2009, pet. stricken) (mem. op., not designated 

for publication) (affirming judgment of conviction). Thus, Relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus constitutes a collateral attack on his conviction. Only the Texas Court of Criminal 

Appeals has authority to grant post-conviction relief from final felony convictions.

1 See Ater v. 

Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); see also In re Briscoe, 

230 S.W.3d 196, 196-97 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding); In re 

McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). 

Accordingly, we dismiss Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

 

1 On February 15, 2017, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued an abuse of writ order against Relator, 

in which it found that he (1) filed seven applications regarding his conviction, (2) “continues to raise issues that have 

been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been presented in previous applications[,]” 

and (3) “[b]ecause of his repetitive claims, ... [his] claims are barred from review under Article 11.07, § 4, and are 

waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ.” Ex Parte Michael Allyn Kennedy, No. WR-75,385-24 (Tex. Crim. 

App. Feb. 15, 2017).
2

Opinion delivered March 31, 2017.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
3

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 31, 2017

NO. 12-17-00088-CR

MICHAEL KENNEDY,

Relator

V.

HON. MARK A. CALHOON,

Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by 

Michael Kennedy; who is the relator in Cause No. 29326, pending on the docket of the 3rd 

Judicial District Court of Anderson County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having 

been filed herein on March 29, 2017, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the 

opinion of this Court that it lacks jurisdiction, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and 

ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
------------Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) Terms of Use Information------------

The creator of this data is outlined in the metadata and at the bottom left corner of each MXD or GeoPDF that is made available through the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC). 

**If the author of this data is the CEC**:

The user is permitted to use this data for non-commercial, non-sublicensable purposes. The user is allowed non-exclusive rights to represent this data as desired.             

**If the author of the data is noted otherwise:**

Please refer to the license information of this individual dataset, or contact that organization or individual if you are unsure of your rights regarding redistribution, use, or license information of this particular dataset.

**Citation**

Please cite the CEC or the author, if the author of the data is noted otherwise, as the source of the data as per the citation in the metadata or at the bottom left corner of each MXD or GeoPDF. 

The CEC does not ensure that this is the most updated representation of this information, although updates will be conducted on an irregular basis. We make every effort to provide and maintain accurate, complete, usable, and timely information on our Web pages. However, some CEC data and information accessed through these pages may, of necessity, be preliminary in nature. These data and information are provided with the understanding that they are not guaranteed to be complete. Users are cautioned to consider carefully the provisional nature of these data and information before using them for decisions that concern personal or public safety or the conduct of business that involves substantial monetary or operational consequences. Conclusions drawn from, or actions undertaken on the basis of, such data and information are the sole responsibility of the user. 

For additional information on your license rights or for more information regarding a particular dataset, please contact the CEC at naatlas@cec.org.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7630

EUGENE RAFFALDT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ROBERT WARD, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-97-1091-2-23) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene Raffaldt, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Raffaldt v. Ward , No. CA-97-1091-2-23 (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Rex A. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Peggy J. WILLIAMS, Appellee.

No. 69-1096.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 2, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3651 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure coverage of 

mental health services furnished through telehealth. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2024 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Ms. SMITH, Mr. THUNE, and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure 

coverage of mental health services furnished through telehealth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telemental Health 

5 Care Access Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENSURING COVERAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERV7 ICES FURNISHED THROUGH TELEHEALTH. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1834(m)(7) of the Social 

9 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(m)(7)) is amended— 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3651 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘subject to 

2 subparagraph (B),’’; 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The geo4 graphic’’ and inserting ‘‘The geographic’’; and 

5 (3) by striking subparagraph (B). 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact8 ment of section 123 of division CC of the Consolidated 

9 Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116–260). 

10 SEC. 3. STUDY AND REPORT ON UTILIZATION OF MENTAL 

11 HEALTH SERVICES FURNISHED THROUGH 

12 TELEHEALTH. 

13 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

14 of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

15 shall submit to Congress a report on the utilization of 

16 mental health services furnished through telehealth under 

17 section 1834(m)(7) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(m)(7)), 

18 that includes any recommendations of the Secretary re19 garding— 

20 (1) fraud or abuse prevention with respect to 

21 such services; and 

22 (2) additional funding that the Office of Inspec23 tor General of the Department of Health and 

24 Human Services may require for purposes of con25 ducting audits, investigations, and other oversight 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3651 IS

1 and enforcement activities with respect to the fur2 nishing of such services. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52766-52767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26814]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-930-1430-01; CACA 8026, CAS 051740, and CAS 2816]


Public Land Order No. 7289; Revocation of Executive Order No. 
6544 and Public Land Orders No. 2618 and 4845; California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order partially revokes Executive Order No. 6544 and 
Public Land Order No. 2618, and revokes Public Land Order No. 4845, in 
its entirety, insofar as they affect 240 acres of lands withdrawn for 
the Forest Service's Gazelle Mountain fire lookout and the Bureau of 
Land Management's Copco Lake Access Area. The lands are no longer 
needed for the purposes for which they were withdrawn, and the 
revocations are necessary to facilitate a pending land exchange. The 
lands are temporarily closed to surface entry and mining because of the 
pending land exchange. The lands have been and will remain open to 
mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 9, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Duane Marti, BLM California State 
Office (CA-931.4), 2135 Butano Drive, Sacramento, California 95825; 
916-978-4675.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Executive Order No. 6544 (CACA 8026), which withdrew public land 
for

[[Page 52767]]

the Forest Service's Gazelle Mountain fire lookout site, is hereby 
revoked insofar as it affects the following described land:

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 41 N., R. 7 W.,
    Sec. 8, NE\1/4\SE\1/4\.

    The area described contains 40 acres in Siskiyou County.

    2. Public Land Order No. 2618 (CAS 051740), and Public Land Order 
No. 4845 (CAS 2816), which withdrew public land for the Bureau of Land 
Management's Copco Lake Access Area, are hereby revoked insofar as they 
affect the following described land:

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 48 N., R. 4 W.,
    Sec. 34, SW\1/4\NE\1/4\, SE\1/4\NW\1/4\, SE\1/4\SE\1/4\, and 
W\1/2\SE\1/4\.

    The area described contains 200 acres in Siskiyou County.

    3. The above described lands are hereby made available for exchange 
under Section 206 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 
1976, 43 U.S.C. 1716 (1994).

    Dated: September 26, 1997.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 97-26814 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1


                     WONDERWARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                        JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
------------------                        -----------------------------

Wonderware North America Corporation      Delaware
Wonderware Europe, Inc.                   Delaware
Wonderware International, Inc.            U.S. Virgin Islands
Wonderware Korea, Ltd.                    Korea
Wonderware of Singapore, Pte. Ltd.        Singapore
Wonderware GmbH                           Germany
Wonderware Italia Spa                     Italy
Wonderware of Argentina, Inc.             Delaware
Wonderware of Japan, Inc.                 Delaware
Wonderware of Mexico, Inc.                Delaware
Wonderware of Taiwan, Inc.                Delaware
Wonderware of the United Kingdom, Inc.    Delaware
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3607 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3607

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that amounts paid 
    for an abortion are not taken into account for purposes of the 
                    deduction for medical expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 17, 2024

   Mr. Lee (for himself, Mr. Braun, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. 
Rubio, Mr. Thune, Mr. Daines, and Mr. Cramer) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that amounts paid 
    for an abortion are not taken into account for purposes of the 
                    deduction for medical expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. AMOUNTS PAID FOR ABORTION NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING 
              DEDUCTION FOR MEDICAL EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Amounts Paid for Abortion Not Taken Into Account.--
            ``(1) In general.--An amount paid during the taxable year 
        for an abortion shall not be taken into account under 
        subsection (a).
            ``(2) Exceptions.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the 
        case of an abortion with respect to--
                    ``(A) a woman suffering from a physical disorder, 
                physical injury, or physical illness, including a life-
                endangering physical condition caused by or arising 
                from the pregnancy itself, that would, as certified by 
                a physician, place the woman in danger of death unless 
                an abortion is performed, or
                    ``(B) a pregnancy that is the result of an act of 
                rape or incest.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-1026 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ESTONIA 

Signed at Tallinn December 11, 2008 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 ESTONIA 

 Scientific Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Tallinn December 11, 2008; 

 Entered into force October 26, 2009. 

 With annexes.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3724 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3724

To prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from using assessments 
 generated by the Integrated Risk Information System as a tier 1 data 
   source in rulemakings and other regulatory actions, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2024

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from using assessments 
 generated by the Integrated Risk Information System as a tier 1 data 
   source in rulemakings and other regulatory actions, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Industrial Restrictions In Secret 
Act of 2024'' or the ``No IRIS Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF ASSESSMENTS GENERATED BY THE INTEGRATED 
              RISK INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAM.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency may not use any assessment 
generated by the Integrated Risk Information System program of the 
Environmental Protection Agency as the primary data source--
            (1) to develop, finalize, or issue a rule or regulation;
            (2) to carry out any other regulatory action; or
            (3) to inform the National Air Toxics Assessment.
                                 <all>
```