alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. and

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES

for statements of authorization pursuant to

14 C.F.R. 212 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket OST-2004-19214

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARING

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Nienke Neij Corporate Legal Counsel

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES P.O. Box 7700, 1117 ZL Schiphol

The Netherlands 31 (0)6 22813099 nienke.neij@klm.com Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director – Regulatory Affairs

& Associate General Counsel Christopher Walker Regional Director – Regulatory Affairs DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
1212 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 842-4184 sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com
chris.walker@delta.com

October 9, 2013BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. and

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES

for statements of authorization pursuant to

14 C.F.R. 212 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket OST-2004-19214

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARING

Pursuant to the blanket statements of authorization granted to Delta Air Lines,

Inc. (“Delta”), KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (“KLM”), and their respective affiliates, the

carriers hereby notify the Department that, on or after 30 days from today, Delta’s “DL*”

designator code will be displayed on the KLM operated routes between Amsterdam

(AMS) and Moscow (SVO); and Amsterdam (AMS) and St. Petersburg (LED).

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Nienke Neij

______________________ Nienke Neij Corporate Legal Counsel

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director – Government Affairs

& Associate General Counsel DELTA AIR LINES, INC.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing Notice has been served this 9 th day of October, 2013, upon the following persons via email:

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com; Francis.Heil@aa.com; Robert.Wirick@aa.com; dan.weiss@united.com; thomas.bolling@united.com; howard.kass@usairways.com; benjamin.slocum@usairways.com; esta.rosenberg@dot.gov; brian.hedberg@dot.gov;
info@airlineinfo.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         221,855
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,819
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               474,483
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    577,110
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         446,298
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           441,094
<LOANS>                                     10,703,218
<ALLOWANCE>                                     47,027
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,664,992
<DEPOSITS>                                   6,320,476
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,114,998
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            659,848
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,699,758
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           316
<OTHER-SE>                                     684,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              13,664,992
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                756,890
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              129,225
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                12,631
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               898,746
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             300,760
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             612,665
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          286,081
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   20,123
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,761
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                188,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                158,353
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     114,378
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   114,378
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.42
<LOANS-NON>                                     61,832
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                39,174
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   12,943
<RECOVERIES>                                       673
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               47,027
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            47,027
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

**Waterfowl Identification in the Central Flyway**

##       Great Blue Heron    

----

****

 Stands four feet tall, is dark grayish-blue and has a wing span of nearly     six feet. These common herons fly with their necks folded and long legs trailing     behind. Often seen as singles or in small groups.   

----

Previous Section
Return to Contents
Next Section

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/waterfwl/heron.htm		Page Contact Information: Webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 03-Aug-2006 11:32:16 EDT		Reston, VA [vaww54]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVEOFFICER’S CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Stephen G.Hanks, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of Washington Group International, Inc.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.   The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.   Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.   Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c.   Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.   The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

a.   All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b.   Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| March 4,  2004 |                                   |
|----------------|----------------------------------------|
|           |                                   |
|           |                                   |
|           | /s/ Stephen  G. Hanks                  |
|           | Stephen G.  Hanks                      |
|           | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Corrpro Companies, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-38767) on Form S-8 of Corrpro Companies, Inc. of our report dated May 9,
2000, except for paragraphs 2 and 4 of note 3 as to which the date is June 12,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Corrpro Companies, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended March 31, 2000, which report appears in the
March 31, 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Corrpro Companies, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
June 28, 2000
#### Edgar MUNGIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-350.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 19, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                        [HUGHES ELECTRONICS letterhead]




                                                                 Exhibit 10.71.2

February 3, 2003



Mr. Joseph Wright
President and CEO
PanAmSat Corporation
20 Westport Road
Wilton, CT 06897

Dear Joe,

As you know, your August 20, 2001 employment offer letter from Hughes included
a provision for a transaction completion bonus of a minimum of $1 million, as
an incentive to you to increase the value of PanAmSat to a prospective buyer.
On September 27, 2002 I sent you a letter modifying the transaction bonus to
be $1.5 million.

I am writing to clarify that when either a Hughes change in control (as defined
in the Hughes Electronics Corporation Incentive Plan) or a PanAmSat change in
control (as defined in your employment letter) occurs your transaction
completion bonus of $1.5 million will be triggered.

This transaction bonus will be payable 50% at the close of the Hughes or the
PanAmSat transaction and 50% on the first one-year anniversary of the close of
the transaction. Should your employment be involuntarily terminated after the
close of the transaction, but before the one-year anniversary for any reason
other than for Cause (as defined in your employment letter), the second
transaction bonus payment will be accelerated and paid to you within five
business days after the effective date of your termination.

Sincerely,



/s/ Jack Shaw
---------------------
Jack Shaw
LAWRENCE ALBERT 

WILLIAMS, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3814

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 5, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Russell L. Healey, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger and Susan S. 

Lerner, Assistant Public Defenders, Miami, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew Pavese and Trisha Meggs Pate, 

Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WINOKUR, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350 TO CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended June 27, 2003, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 to Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Varian, Inc.



|Dated:                                                                        |  | August 6, 2003
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|                                                                             
|/s/    ALLEN J.
LAUER                                                        
|Allen J. Lauer Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Varian,
Inc.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-921 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR SAFETY 

 Arrangement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and FINLAND 

Signed at Vienna September 21, 2011 

with 

Addenda 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
FINLAND 

Nuclear Safety 

 Arrangement signed at Vienna September 21, 2011; 

 Entered into force September 21, 2011. 

 With addenda.
#### Calvin J. LEACH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2177.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 26, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Craig S. Barnard, Asst. Public Defender, and Paul M. Tabio, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard P. Zaretsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial of this case and affirm defendant’s conviction. In sentencing the defendant, however, the trial court failed to give the defendant credit for jail time already served while awaiting sentence. He is entitled to such credit although not to duplicate credit. *McKnight v. State,*325 So.2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Upon remand the trial court is directed to determine whether defendant has, in fact, received credit for jail time served and if he has not, the court shall modify the sentence in this case accordingly.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

CROSS, ALDERMAN and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
L:\SURVEY\QAQC\CFLHD Current Standards and Specifications for SMROW\CFLHDMapping-Film-Can-Label-k.doc 

CENTRAL FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION 

Film Can Label 

 

PROJECT: ROLL # 1 of STATE:_______ 

PROJECT#: FLIGHT HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND:________ 

 

APPROX. PHOTO SCALE: 1: CAMERA:________________ _ 

MAGAZINE NUMBER: LENS NUMBER:____________ 

CFL (mm): SHUTTER SPEED:____________________

f/NUMBER:_____________________

NAME OF CONTRACTOR:________________________________________ _

ADDRESS: PHONE:_____________ Exposures 

Line Direction From To Date Time Remarks 

 

1___________________________________________________________2

___________________________________________________________3_

__________________________________________________________4__

_________________________________________________________5___

________________________________________________________6____

_______________________________________________________7_____

_____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________ 

_____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________
NIHSeniorHealth: Transcript "Can Kidney Disease Get Better? "

file:///C|/Users/mames/Desktop/test/gpo20741/NIHSeniorHealth%20Transcript%20Can%20Kidney%20Disease%20Get%20Better%20.htm[1/13/2014 10:23:13 AM]

Transcript: "Can Kidney Disease Get Better? "

Narrator: A doctor speaks with a patient in his office.

Patient: Can kidney disease get better?

Doctor: The kidney damage that occurs in chronic kidney disease is usually permanent and tends to

get worse over time. Diabetes and high blood pressure, which are the major causes of chronic kidney

disease, cause scarring in the kidney over time, and as you know, scarring doesn't go away. As a

result, the kidneys don't improve. What we aim to do with treatment is to try to prevent further

damage. The GFR test, the blood test which measures how well your kidneys are filtering will not get

better because the kidneys don't get better. What we aim to do is to keep it from getting worse.
FLMA - Unstable Slope Management Program Field Mitigation Cost Estimating Form Rev 1.02 (December 2017)

Prepared by: Landslide Technology, WFLHD, USDA FS, BLM, BIA and NPS

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND COST ESTIMATE FORM – UNSTABLE SLOPE SITE INFORMATION

Management Area: Date:

Road/Trail No.: ⃝ Trail Created By: ⃝ Road 

Beginning MP: Ending MP: Side: Weather:

Hazard Type (select all 

that apply within one 

of the categories):

Rockfall Planar | Wedge | Toppling |

Raveling/Undermining | Rock Avalanche | 

Indeterminate Rock Failures | Diff. Erosion

Landslide Above, Below, or Across Route

Translational | Rotational | Debris Flow |

Shallow slump | Erosional Failure

Previous Total Rating: Previous Rating Agency: Previous Rating Date:

Current Rating (if re-rated): Photo # Range:

Problem Statement:

Proposed Correction:

ESTIMATING FACTORS

Item Unit Amount 

Required Unit Cost Total Cost

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $0.00
EXHIBIT 4.3



 


Exhibit 4.3


PROMISSORY NOTE



	 	 	 
	Value: $400,000.00	 	
Dated: August 29, 2002



          FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ZIM TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL INC. (the “Debtor”)
hereby promises to pay on demand to or to the order of 160879 Canada Inc. (the
“Holder”) in the City of Ottawa, Ontario at such address as the Holder may from
time to time direct, the amount of Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400,000.00),
in lawful money of Canada plus interest as herein provided. Interest shall be
calculated on the principal sum outstanding at the rate per annum of five (5%)
percent and shall accrue to the date of payment.



          Notwithstanding the other terms hereof, the Debtor shall have the right to
prepay at any time and from time to time without a bonus all or any portion of
the amount outstanding, including interest, under this Note.



          The Debtor and all endorsers of this Note hereby waive presentment of
payment, notice of non-payment, protest and notice of protest.



          This Note and the obligations represented hereby shall be binding upon the
Debtor and its permitted successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit
of the Holder and its successors and assigns.



          DATED at Ottawa, this 29th day of August 2002.








	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SIGNED, SEALED & DELIVERED	 	 	 	)	 	 
	 	 	 	 	)	 	 
	 	 	 	 	)	 	ZIM TECHNOLOGIES
	 	 	 	 	)	 	INTERNATIONAL INC.
	 	 	 	 	)	 	per:
	 	 	 	 	)	 	/s/ James Stechyson
	 	 	 	 	)	 	

	 	 	 	 	)	 	Name: James Stechyson
	 	 	 	 	)	 	Title: Chairman
	 	 	 	 	)	 	I have the authority to bind the Corporation
TRANSMITTED VIA EMAILANDPOSTAL MAIL June 18, 2013 Dr. Kelley Spence Natural Resources Group, Sector Policies and Program Division Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards (E143-03) Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 Re: Extension ofcomment period for Kraft Pulp Mills NSPS Review, Docket ID EPA-HQOAR-2012-0640 Dear Dr. Spence, I am writing onbehalfofourmembers and online activists to request a 30-day extension ofthe commentperiod for the proposed Kraft Pulp MillsNew Source Performance Standards. As you are aware, this is the first time these standards have been reviewed in over 25 years. Much has changed since the standards were last promulgated. We believe thatthe 45-day commentperiod, which ends July 8, 2013, is inadequateto allow in-depth analysis ofthe proposedrule issued by the EPA. Because this is the first opportunity after more thantwo decades for public comment on: these standards, we request additional time to prepare comments to this rule. Thank Y9-u'for your consideration. Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions. Sincerely, 

## (

# ~**ve~dee** . SeniorAttorney Center for Biological Diversity (415) 436-9682 ext. 317 vpardee@biologicaldiversity.org

Alaska. Arizona. California. Florida. • Nevada. New Mexico. New York.

. Vermont. """,,,mn<Jlfln DC Vera Pardee, Senior Attorney. 351 California St, Ste. 600. San Francisco, CA 94104 Phone: (415) 436.9682 )(317 • Fax: (415) 436.9683 • vpardee@bio{ogica!dlversity.org