SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)
SIP Submitted by: The Government ofthe District of Columbia Date Submitted: AprilS, 2013 Subject: Amendments to Chapters 1 and 2 of Title 20 (Environment) ofthe District of Columbia Municipal Regulations (DCMR) regarding the District of Columbia's New Source Review Regulations

Completeness Review Completed by: Paul Wentworth Date Completed: April25, 2013
Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE

- 

# I EPA REQUIREMENT 

# I STATE SUBMITTAL 

# I (X) 

# I

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his 1. A Letter dated April 5, 2013 on behalf of the Government of X**~esignee,** requesting EPA approval ofthe plan or revision the District of Columbia from Keith A. Anderson, Acting hereof. Director, District Department of the Environment Department ofthe Environment Air Quality Division to Shawn M. Garvin, Regional Administrator, EPA Region III**~-** Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code 2. Notice of Final Rulemaking provides information on the X pr body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent effective date and the issuance date. The notice and all the**~greement** in fmal form. That evidence shall include the date adopted amended rules are listed at published at: pf adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date ofthe httg: //www
.dcregs

.dc

. gov/Gateway/NoticeHome.asgx?Search T tplan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. ype=DCR&NoticeiD=4049670

. Data of adoption: 11/16/2012 Check to see ifthe regulation, permit, order or consent decree !has a sunset or expiration date. If so it is not acceptable as a SIP submission.

-- -**-~** . " 

### EPA REQIDREMENT 3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority Iunder State law to adopt and implement the plan. 

### STATESUBN.fiTT AL 

## 100 3. District Department ofthe Environment's legal authority is I X set forth in sections 5 and 6(b) of the District of Columbia Air Pollution Control Act of 1984, as amended, effective March 15, 1985 (D.C. Law 5-165; D.C. Officia1 Code§§ 8- 1 01.05 and 8- 101. 06(b)(2008 Repl.)); section 107(4) ofthe Di strict Department ofthe Environment Establishment Act of 2005, effective February 15, 2006 (D.C. Law 16-51; D. C

. Official Code§ 8-151.07(4)(2008 Repl.)); Mayor's Order 98-44, dated AprillO, 1998, and Mayor's Order 2006-61, dated June 14, 2006. 

## 14. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for ,4. A copy of the regulation showing changes and effective date**~pproval** and incorporation by reference into the plan, including is included in the submittal. "ndication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, !where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed; stamped, dated by the 

### X**~ppropriate** State official indicating that it is fully enforceable lby the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural equirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting land completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. The submittal contains the Notice of final rulemaking I X documents the fact that, as required by section 6(b) ofthe District of Columbia Air Pollution Control Ac1t, prior to the issuance of a Notice ofFinal Rulemaking, therulemaking was submitted to the Council ofthe District of Columbia (Council) for a review period of up to forty-five (45) days. The Notice of Final Rulemaking was deemed approved by the Council on November 1 , 2012.**~-Evidence** that public notice was given ofthe proposed 6. The submittal includes a copy ofthe Notice of final IX**~hange** consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including rulemaking stating that both the Public Notice and the proposed he date ofpublication of such notice. regulations were publi shed on the DDOE' s webs ite at: http: //www
.ddoe.dc

. gov/node/80512 and in the DC Register at: http: //www
.dcregs

.dc.gov/Gateway/NoticeHome

.aspx?SearchT ype=DCR&NoticeiD=4049670 on Friday February 17,2012. The notice provided locations where the proposed regulation was available for inspection and provided a comment period from February 17, 2012 to March 19, 2012.

### EPA REQUIREMENT STATESUBNUTTAL**~** 

# l7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance**~th** the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. The submittal includes a copy ofthe memorandum from 

### I X Cecily Beall to Christophe A.G. Tulou, dated March 20,2012, titled: " Hearing officer's Certification for the Public Hearing
on Proposed New Source Review Regulations and Proposed Amendments ot State Implementation Plan," certified that a !public hearing was held on March 19, 2012. 

# 8. Compilation ofpublic comments and the State's response 

# 18. The submittal contains copies of compilation ofpublic 

### I X hereto. comments and agency responses. Technical Materials 1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan.,l. The amended definition of Major Source includes the 

### I X phrase: "any pollutant regulated under the Clean Air Act" 

# e identification ofthe locations of affected sources including
e EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations d the status ofthe attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. Section 204 of the amended regulations provides permit requirements for major Sources located in non-attainment areas. 3. Quantification ofthe changes in plan allowable emissions 

### 13. N/A**om** the affected sources; estimates of changes in current

ctual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, uantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations ofthe differences between certain**~aseline** levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result**~f** the revision.**~·The** State's demonstration that the national ambient air**~uality** standards, prevention of significant deterioration

·ncrements, reasonable further progress demonstration, and risibility' as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved**~d** implemented. 4. The proposed regulations will enhance the currently approved program in DC.



### 5. Modeling information required to support the proposed 

### 15. N/A**~evision ,**  including input data, output data, models used,**~bient** monitoring data used, meteorological data used, 'ustification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of**~odels** used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the**~etermination** of adequacy ofthe modeling analysis. X

X

### EPA REQUIRE:MENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) 6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are 6 The nonattainment NSR regulations require the application X based on continuous emission reduction technology. technology of LAER (Lowest Achievable Emissions Rates). 7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7. Found in regulations Section 204.6 practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8. Found in regulations Section 200.1 compliance will be determined in practice. 9. Special economic and technological justifications required by 9.N/A .·. any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a 10. N/A maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.