alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5410-5411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2862]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal

[[Page 5411]]

Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than February 20, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Randolph S. Miles, Antioch, Illinois; to retain 35.88 percent of 
the shares of Antioch Holding Company, Antioch, Illinois, and thereby 
indirectly retain share of State Bank of The Lakes, Antioch, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 31, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-2862 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28700]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4251-000]


Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.; Notice of Filing

October 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 11, 1997, Orange and Rockland 
Utilities, Inc., tendered for filing a Notice of Withdrawal of in the 
above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before November 6, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28700 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Bernice RIEMER, Appellant, v. David RIEMER, Appellee.

No. 69-794.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 19, 1970.

Bloom & Saks, Miami, for appellant.

Wallace & Kreutzer, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carlton v. Carlton, Fla.1958, 104 So.2d 363, on the issue of insufficiency of proof as to the allegations of extreme cruelty; see Martin v. Martin, Fla.1953, 66 So.2d 268, as to the general rule of proper corroboration of testimony.
II 

Calendar No. 327 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3640 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

155 South Main Street in Mount Clemens, Michigan, as the ‘‘Lieutenant 

Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23, 2024 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Ms. STABENOW) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

FEBRUARY 6, 2024 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 155 South Main Street in Mount Clemens, 

Michigan, as the ‘‘Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3640 RS

1 SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT COLONEL ALEXANDER JEFFER2 SON POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 155 South Main Street in Mount 

5 Clemens, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lieutenant Colonel 

11 Alexander Jefferson Post Office’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 327 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3640 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostColonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office’’. Mount Clemens, Michigan, as the ‘‘Lieutenant al Service located at 155 South Main Street in 

FEBRUARY 6, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paulita M. LaPlante, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, the Annual Report of Optical Sensors Incorporated on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Optical Sensors
Incorporated.

April 9, 2004


                                        By: /s/ Paulita M. LaPlante
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Paulita M. LaPlante
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer

I, Wesley G. Peterson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, the Annual Report of Optical Sensors Incorporated on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Optical Sensors
Incorporated.

April 9, 2004


                                        By: /s/ Wesley G. Peterson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Wesley G. Peterson
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

SC-06 South Carolina Higway 161 Resurfacing

National Park Service - 

Kings Mountain 

National Military Park

SC Department of 

Transportation York

SC-07 South Carolina Higway 248 Resurfacing

National Park Service - 

Ninety Six National 

Historic Site

SC Department of 

Transportation Greenwood

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the South Carolina Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its initial, multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the South Carolina FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

South Carolina Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2013-2014

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. Funding for these projects is not guaranteed. Funding 

beyond 2014 is dependent on reauthorization of the Access Program by Congress. The South Carolina PDC does not have a firm date for the next call for 

projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. If you have any questions please contact David Payne, Access 

Program Manager, at 571-434-1543 or email at David.Payne@dot.gov.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-1211 

________________________________________________________________________ 

PEACE CORPS 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and INDONESIA 

Signed at Jakarta December 11, 2009 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 INDONESIA 

 Peace Corps 

 Memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Jakarta December 11, 2009; 

 Entered into force December 11, 2009.
#### Gary SALE, Appellant, v. TOWN COUNCIL OF LEE, Florida, Appellee.

No. HH-392.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 18, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 1978.

John D. Carlson, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Cary A. Hardee of Davis, Browning & Hardee, Madison, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as the timeliness of the petition for certiorari in the Circuit Court of Madison County is affected by whether the Town of Lee “rendered” its decision on August 15, 1977, F.A.R. 4.5c(l), and this record is unclear in that respect, the judgment of the circuit court dismissing appellant’s petition for certiorari will be REVERSED and the case REMANDED to permit amendment of the petition for writ of certiorari to allege facts which may dem*763onstrate that the Town’s decision was not rendered on August 15, 1977, and that the petition for writ of certiorari was not untimely when filed September 16, 1977. ■

REVERSED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3619 

To amend chapter 25 of title 14, United States Code, to prohibit the use 

of Coast Guard funds and facilities to perform abortions and to prohibit 

the provision of travel and transportation allowances to obtain abortions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 18, 2024 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 25 of title 14, United States Code, to 

prohibit the use of Coast Guard funds and facilities 

to perform abortions and to prohibit the provision of 

travel and transportation allowances to obtain abortions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guaranteeing the Un5 born Access to Respect and Dignity Act’’ or the ‘‘GUARD 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3619 IS

1 SEC. 2. PERFORMANCE OF ABORTIONS: RESTRICTIONS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 25 of title 

3 14, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘§ 2517. Performance of abortions: restrictions 

6 ‘‘(a) RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF FUNDS.—Funds 

7 available to the Department of Homeland Security for the 

8 Coast Guard may not be used to perform abortions except 

9 where the life of the mother would be endangered if the 

10 fetus were carried to term or in a case in which the preg11 nancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. 

12 ‘‘(b) RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF FACILITIES.—No 

13 medical treatment facility or other facility of the Coast 

14 Guard may be used to perform an abortion except where 

15 the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus 

16 were carried to term or in a case in which the pregnancy 

17 is the result of an act of rape or incest. 

18 ‘‘(c) PROHIBITION ON PROVISION OF TRAVEL AND

19 TRANSPORTATION ALLOWANCE TO OBTAIN ABOR20 TIONS.—The Secretary may not provide transportation, 

21 lodging, meals-in-kind, or any actual or necessary ex22 penses of travel or transportation, for, or in connection 

23 with, official travel for a member of the Coast Guard or 

24 a dependent of such a member seeking an abortion or any 

25 abortion-related service, except in a case in which the life 

26 of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:53 Jan 25, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3619.IS S3619

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3619 IS

1 ried to term or the pregnancy is the result of an act of 

2 rape or incest.’’. 

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for chap4 ter 25 of title 14, United States Code, is amended by in5 serting after the item relating to section 2516 the fol6 lowing: 

‘‘2517. Performance of abortions: restrictions.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Jerry DuBOSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-409.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Jan. 26, 1971.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full considera*185tion, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
October 2, 2015

Mr. David Milkovich

30 Nelson Road

Vestal, NY 13850

Dear Mr. Milkovich :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ § 91.119©, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1)(2), and 91.417(a)(b) of

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Yo ur Request

We received your June 12, 2015

, exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2833

, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html

. This website helps the petitioner to me et Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notif ying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/ s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55842-55843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28511]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2623]


Shipping Coordinating Committee Subcommittee on Standards of 
Training and Watchkeeping; Notice of Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) will conduct an open 
meeting at 9:30 AM on Wednesday, December 3, 1997, in Room 6319 of the 
United States Coast Guard Headquarters Building, 2100 2nd Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20593-0001. The primary purpose of the meeting is to 
prepare for the twenty-ninth session of the International Maritime 
Organization (IMO) Sub-Committee on Standards of Training and 
Watchkeeping (STW) to be held at IMO from January 12 to 16, 1998. 
Preparations for the Joint IMO/ILO Working Group on Standard format for 
work hour records, which will be held at IMO from January 19 to 23, 
1998, will also be discussed.
    The primary matters to be considered include:
    1. Review of IMO guidance on principles of safe manning (i.e., crew 
size);
    2. Work emanating from the 1995 Conference of Parties to the 
International Convention on Standards

[[Page 55843]]

of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping (STCW), including 
consideration of training requirements for maritime pilots;
    3. Maritime safety training for personnel on Mobile Offshore Units 
(MOU/MODUs);
    4. Bulk carrier safety;
    5. Training record books; and
    6. Guidance associated with the International Convention on 
Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Fishing 
Vessel Personnel (STCW-F Convention, as adopted by the 1995 conference; 
not yet ratified or in force).
    Members of the public may attend the meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing: Mr. Christopher Young, U.S. Coast Guard (G-MOS-1), Room 1210, 
2100 Second Street SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling: (202) 
267-0229.

    Dated: October 16, 1997.
Stephen M. Miller,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-28511 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
No. 9672.

#### York et al. *v.*Warner, Admr., de bonis non.

(Decided November 20, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

*Mr. William M. Raynolds,*for plaintiffs in *error.*

*Messrs. Carr, Stearns & Chamberlain,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed, 29 Ohio St., 230, not applying.

Shauck, C. J., Price and Crew, JJ., concur.
<Page>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.11

                          SCHEDULE OF LEASE AMENDMENTS
Commercial Lease ("Lease") between Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc.
  and Leggat McCall Properties Management, Inc. (dated October 31, 1994)


1.  Second Amendment to the Lease dated as of October 7, 1996 adding 7,308
    rentable square feet on the lower level of the building known and
    numbered as Ten Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts.

2.  Third Amendment to the Lease dated as of July 1999 adding approximately
    19,020 square feet of space on the second floor and approximately 42
    square feet of space located on the ground floor of the building known
    and numbered as Ten Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts.

3.  Fourth Amendment to the Lease dated as of September 29, 2000 adding
    approximately 3,434 square feet of rentable space on the sixth floor of
    the building known and numbered as Ten Post Office Square, Boston,
    Massachusetts.

4.  Fifth Amendment to the Lease dated as of January 4, 2002 adding
    approximately 3,434 square feet of rentable space on the thirteenth floor
    of the building known and numbered as Ten Post Office Square, Boston,
    Massachusetts.
# L_2005122EN.01002401.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 122/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 122/24

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 743/2005

of 13 May 2005

concerning tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender for the export to certain third countries of wholly milled and medium and long grain A rice issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 14(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 14(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders submitted from 9 to 12 May 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the export refund on wholly milled rand, medium and long grain A rice to certain third European countries issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 May 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 May 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 353, 27.11.2004, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 61, 7.3.1975, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 18).

3

---