alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3587 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to immediately initiate removal 

proceedings for aliens whose visas are revoked on security or related grounds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 11, 2024 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. VANCE, and Mr. LEE) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to immediately initiate removal proceedings for aliens whose visas 

are revoked on security or related grounds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mandatory Removal 

5 Proceedings Act’’. 

2 

•S 3587 IS

1 SEC. 2. MANDATORY INITIATION OF REMOVAL PRO2 CEEDINGS FOR ALIENS WHOSE VISAS ARE 

3 REVOKED ON SECURITY OR RELATED 

4 GROUNDS. 

5 Section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality 

6 Act (8 U.S.C. 1201(i)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘After the issuance’’ and insert8 ing the following: ‘‘VISA REVOCATION.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—After’’; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘his discretion’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘in the discretion of the Secretary’’; 

12 (3) by striking ‘‘Attorney General’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘Secretary of Homeland Security’’; 

14 (4) by striking ‘‘issuance: Provided, That car15 riers’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘issuance. 

16 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—Carriers’’; and 

17 (5) by striking ‘‘There shall be no means’’ and 

18 inserting the following: 

19 ‘‘(3) MANDATORY REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS.—If 

20 the visa of an alien is revoked pursuant to para21 graph (1) as a result of a ground for removal de22 scribed in section 237(a)(4), the Secretary of Home23 land Security shall immediately initiate removal pro24 ceedings for such alien. 

3 

•S 3587 IS

1 ‘‘(4) JUDICIAL REVIEW.—There shall be no 

2 means’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Nutritional Sourcing
 Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
 October 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
 the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William T. Keon III, Chief Executive
 Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
 the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
 Company.


 Dated:  December 23, 2004


                                                /s/ William T. Keon III
                                                ---------------------------
                                                William T. Keon III
                                                Chief Executive Officer


 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed
 as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

















<PAGE> 2

- 2 -
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 51606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20894]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7993]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Extravagant Inventions: The Princely Furniture of the 
Roentgens,'' Formerly Titled ``Seductive Luxury and Innovation: The 
Furniture of Abraham and David Roentgen''

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 29, 2011, notice was published on page 53705 of the 
Federal Register (volume 76, number 167) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibition ``Seductive Luxury and 
Innovation: The Furniture of Abraham and David Roentgen.'' The 
referenced notice is corrected here to change the exhibition name to 
``Extravagant Inventions: The Princely Furniture of the Roentgens'' and 
to include additional objects as part of the exhibition. Notice is 
hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority 
vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs 
Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 
U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 
1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as 
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I 
hereby determine that the additional objects to be included in the 
exhibition ``Extravagant Inventions: The Princely Furniture of the 
Roentgens,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The additional objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
additional exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 
NY, from on or about October 29, 2012, until on or about January 27, 
2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. At the conclusion of the 
exhibition at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, three of the works will 
continue to be displayed at The Metropolitan Museum of Art until on or 
about January 31, 2014. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the additional exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, 
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 17, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-20894 Filed 8-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### Jessie James COVINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1103.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 7, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Joseph R. Atterbury, Legal Intern, and Frank B. Kessler, Chief, Appellate Division, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

MOORE, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence for the crime of burglary wherein the defendant was alleged to have committed a burglary at the Middle Six School located at Gifford in Indian River County, Florida. The information alleged that the school was the property of Indian River County. At trial, the vice-principal of the school testified that the school was “run” by the Board of Public Instruction of Indian River County.

In burglary prosecutions, it has been repeatedly held that the allegation of ownership of a building alleged to have been burglarized must be proved as alleged. *Smith v. State,*96 Fla. 30, 117 So. 377 (1928); *Salerno v. State,*347 So.2d 659, 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). Proof of ownership is an essential element of the offense of burglary.

In the instant case, the proof of ownership of the property was insufficient to sustain the conviction. While the Board of Public Institution “ran” the school, this does not indicate that Indian River County “owned” the school. Thus, the probata does not sustain the allegata and the state failed to produce any evidence of the actual ownership of the school property.

Appellant’s conviction for burglary must be, and is, REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial. *Salerno, supra; Mitchell v. State,*317 So.2d 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). See also, *State v. Ward,*354 So.2d 125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

DOWNEY, C. J., and LETTS, J., concur.
# L_2005194EN.01000701.xml

| 26.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 194/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 194/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1194/2005

of 25 July 2005

amending Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards the grant of aid for skimmed milk and skimmed-milk powder intended for animal feed and the sale of such skimmed-milk powder

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 26 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 (2), intervention agencies have organised a standing invitation to tender for skimmed-milk powder taken into storage before 1 September 2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 26 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 (2), intervention agencies have organised a standing invitation to tender for skimmed-milk powder taken into storage before 1 September 2004.

| (2) | In view of the quantity still available and the market situation, that date should be amended to 1 July 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the quantity still available and the market situation, that date should be amended to 1 July 2005.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999, the date of ‘1 September 2004’ is replaced by the date ‘1 July 2005’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 July 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 340, 31.12.1999, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1109/2005 (OJ L 170, 1.7.2005, p. 31).

2

---
Exhibit 31.1



Rule 13a  14(a) CERTIFICATION



I, Merrill J. Forgotson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Merrill J. Forgotson             
|                      |  | Merrill J. Forgotson                 
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kevin Connelly, as Chief Financial Officer of Taro Pharmaceutical
Industries Ltd. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the accompanying Form 20-F report for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ By: Kevin ConnellyKevin ConnellyDate: May 28, 2004
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 104
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Timothy Peter GARVEY, Relator, v. The Honorable Grady L. CRAWFORD, as one of the Judges of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 19, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition denied.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 334 

To modify the restriction in section 3326 of title 5, United States Code, 

relating to the appointment of retired members of the Armed Forces 

to positions in the Department of Defense to apply to positions at 

or above the GS–14 level. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. LEE, Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. 

BRAUN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. OSSOFF, and Mr. WARNOCK) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To modify the restriction in section 3326 of title 5, United 

States Code, relating to the appointment of retired members of the Armed Forces to positions in the Department 

of Defense to apply to positions at or above the GS– 

14 level. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Retain Skilled Vet5 erans Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 334 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON APPOINTMENT OF RETIRED MEM2 BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES TO CERTAIN 

3 POSITIONS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DE4 FENSE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3326 of title 5, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in the section heading, by inserting ‘‘CER8 TAIN’’ before ‘‘POSITIONS’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (b)— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘appointed’’ and all that 

11 follows through ‘‘Defense’’ and inserting ‘‘ap12 pointed to a position in the excepted or com13 petitive service classified at or above GS–14 of 

14 the General Schedule (or equivalent) in or 

15 under the Department of Defense’’; and 

16 (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘for the 

17 purpose’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Manage18 ment’’. 

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

20 at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 33 of such 

21 title is amended in the item relating to section 3326 by 

22 inserting ‘‘certain’’ before ‘‘positions’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00347-CV

MICAH DYER

v.

RODOLFO FRANZ, DBA NATIONAL TOW

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CL-12-3193-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed 

in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the 

case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the 

appeal are adjudged 50% against appellant and against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 27, 2014
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
April 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Varian, Inc.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 11, 2009                                   
|                                                      
|/s/ GARRY W. ROGERSON                                 
|Garry W. Rogerson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of iParty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,
that to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.














Date:
August 11, 2008


/s/ SAL
PERISANO


Sal Perisano


Chief Executive
Officer
#### GULF CITIES GAS CORPORATION, Appellant, v. TANGELO PARK SERVICE COMPANY, a corporation, and the Fuel Gas Corporation, a corporation, Appellees.

No. 1970.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 8, 1970.

Ernest R. Drosdick, of Lownes, Peirsol, Drosdick & Baker, Orlando, for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no harmful error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ-, concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 13, 2016

NO. 03-16-00003-CV

Kit Fankhauser, Appellant

v.

Gateway McKenzie, LLC d/b/a The Kenzie at The Domain, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, the 

Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted his appeal and did not comply with a notice 

from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. 

Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


Board of Directors
Starcraft Corporation and Subsidiaries
Goshen, Indiana


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 No.  33-73148)  pertaining  to the  Starcraft  Automotive  Corporation
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust,  in the  Registration  Statement (Form S-8
No. 33-70030) pertaining to the Starcraft Automotive Corporation Stock Incentive
Plan, in the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  333-28247  and  333-30052)
pertaining to the Starcraft  Corporation  1997 Stock  Incentive  Plan and in the
Registration  Statement (Form S-2 No. 333-96989)  pertaining to shares of common
stock issued upon  exercise of certain  warrants and options of our report dated
November 22, 2002,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of
Starcraft Corporation and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the years ended September 29, 2002, September 30, 2001 and October 1, 2000.



                                                  Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Elkhart, Indiana
December 23, 2002