alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005327EN.01000801.xml

| 23.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/8

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 December 2005

appointing the President of the Boards of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(2005/C 327/05)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (1), and in particular Articles 120 and 131 thereof,

1

Having regard to the candidates put forward by the Administrative Board of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) on 23 November 2005,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Paul MAIER, born in Strasbourg (France) on 4 May 1958, is hereby appointed President of the Boards of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) for a period of five years.

Article 2

The date on which the five-year period referred to in Article 1 starts shall be determined by the Administrative Board of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).

Done at Brussels, 12 December 2005

For the Council

The President

J. STRAW

---

(1)  OJ L 11, 14.1.1994, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 422/2004 (OJ L 70, 9.3.2004, p. 1).

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27830]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP96-809-000, et al.]


Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline L.L.C.; Notice of Public Field 
Trip for the Proposed Maritimes Phase II Project

October 15, 1997.
    On October 29, 30, and 31, 1997, the staff of the Office of 
Pipeline Regulation will conduct a public field trip of facilities 
proposed by Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. in the above 
referenced docket for the Maritimes Phase II Project. Limited sites 
along the proposed pipelines including the Skowhegan and Millinocket 
Laterals, and alternative routes, including the Northern Alternative, 
will be visited. Anyone interested in participating in the site visit 
may contact Mr. Paul McKee in the Commission's Office of External 
Affairs at (202) 208-1088 for more details and must provide their own 
transportation.
Robert J. Cupina,
Deputy Director, Office of Pipeline Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-27830 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
January 2, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Varian,
Inc.



Dated: February 11, 2004



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. EDWARD MCCLAMMY                                                         
|G. Edward McClammy Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
255 La. 1099

#### Leon J. KINCHEN v. Charles A. HANSBROUGH et al.

No. 50475.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 4, 1970.

In re: Charles A. Hansbrough, Maxine S. Hansbrough and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company applying for certi-orari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 231 So.2d 700.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
1 From: Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 3:11 PM To: RedHill Subject: No JP in our soil & water!

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

Aloha EPA

------------------------------ Back in 1975, while assigned to the Squadron, “ , the ship was incapable of producing sufficient water for operat ions, so we had to tank with a converted oiler every so often. You couldn’t taste it during the day, but after taps and t he stirrer was shut down, you couldn’t drink the water due to the extreme JP-5 kerosene ta ste (I imagine JP-8 doesn’t tast e any different). The first time I took a drink from the scuttlebutt in the island on night check, I had to spit it out immediately. From that point on, I had some very strange skin problems, and in sick bay, I became known as “The Cyst.” During a Captain’s Call, someone asked the CO what the funky taste in the wate r was and we were told it was salt water intrusion. They actually believed we didn’t know the difference between kerosene and salt. Many years later, I discovered there is an additive in jet fuel to prevent an organism from living in kero sene, whose excreta dissolves aluminum, which is not be healthy for us, either. That aquifer must be tested periodically for toxic contam ination. I compare this to what happened to the Marine Corps Recruit Training Base at Parris Island, SC with the toxic contamination they had fo r so long. When the Master Sergeant’s daughter died as a result of it, he went on a one man crusade to clean up the mess. There is already enough angst over the US m ilitary being in Hawai'i after the Bayonet Constitution in 1898, where the Navy and Marines assisted the sugar barons in overthrowing Queen Lili’uokalani. Just something to consider.

--------------------------------------------------- Aloha,

!
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

**Waterfowl Identification in the Central Flyway**

##       Snow Goose (Snows)    

----

**Sexes Similar**
****

**Body:** Medium-sized goose, 27-31 inches long, 4 - 6 1/2     pounds. Adult snow white; immature dusky white. Bill of adult pink with whitish     tip. Immature bill, dusky. Bill forms "grin-patch" where upper and lower portions     meet. Feet of adult pink; immature feet, dusky. **Wings:** Adult,     snow white with black primaries; immature, dusky with black primaries. **Voice:**     Harsh, high-pitched *yelp.***In Flight:** Adult, snow     white body and black wing tips; immature, dusky white body and black wing     tips.   

****

----

Previous Section
Return to Contents
Next Section

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/waterfwl/snow.htm		Page Contact Information: Webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 03-Aug-2006 11:32:16 EDT		Reston, VA [vaww54]
#### Vinson ATES and Minnie Ates, husband and wife, Petitioners, v. John PITTMAN, Respondent.

No. 44323.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 16, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 280 So.2d 717.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Telegen Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
      N. Herring, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated
                as of March 28, 2008
            
            /s/
                Richard N. HerringRichard
                N. Herring
              Chief
                Executive Officer
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM














We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Empire Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-3 (No.’s 333-153336, 333-145952,
333-144815, 333-118899, 333-112529, 333-110543, 333-104541, 333-96667,
333-45610, 333-33204, 333-43861 and 333-39887), Form S-4 (No. 333-109146) and
Form S-8 (No.’s 333-132889, 333-90611 and 333-37293) of our report dated March
13, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting of Empire Resorts, Inc. and
subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Empire Resorts,
Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008 and to the reference to our Firm under
the caption “Experts” in the Prospectus.








/s/
Friedman LLP





Friedman
LLP





New York,
New York


March 13,
2009
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**404 KA 09-02280**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARGARET MOONEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JASON J. BOWMAN, ONTARIO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Richard A. Keenan, J.), rendered June 18, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and assault in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her following a jury trial of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [6]) and two counts of robbery in the second degree (§ 160.10 [1], [2] [a]), defendant contends that the evidence of physical injury is legally insufficient to support her conviction. Because defendant’s motion for a trial order of dismissal was not “ ‘specifically directed’ at th[at] alleged error,” defendant failed to preserve her contention for our review ( People v Gray , 86 NY2d 10, 19). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury ( see People v Danielson , 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see generally People v Bleakley , 69 NY2d 490, 495; People v Robinson , 104 AD3d 1312, 1312, lv denied 21 NY3d 1008).

Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32

CEO/CFO Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bank Building Corporation,
certifies that to the best of his knowledge and belief the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bank Building Corporation at the dates and for
the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to
update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                              |  |                                                                                                             
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 1, 2006 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Worth Harris Carter, Jr.
|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                              |  | Worth Harris Carter, Jr.Chairman of the Board, President,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
TTP Bridge Application Flowchart

Tribe Identifies Bridge

BIA Region will assist the Tribe in preparing 

the application and reviewing the application 

package for completeness.

(See Bridge Application Form)

Do you have an Agreement with BIA or FHWA?

FHWA Tribes BIA Tribes

FHWA TC will assist the Tribe in preparing the 

application and reviewing the application package for completeness.

(See Bridge Application Form)

FHWA TC will submit the application package 

to FHWA’s Office of Tribal Transportation 

Bridge Program Manager (PM) for review of 

the application.

The BIA region will submit the application 

package to BIADOT for review.

BIADOT will review and submit the application 

package to FHWA’s Office of Tribal Transportation Bridge Program Manager (PM) for review 

of the application.

OTT Bridge PM will notify the Tribe of the 

application status,

FHWA’s Office of Tribal Transportation 

Bridge Program Manager (PM) will review 

the applications.

No

Is the Bridge Eligible for 

TTP Funds?

(See TTP Bridge Program 

Flowchart)

No further action required

Yes
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Imaging Group, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Roland Breton, Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/Roland Breton
Roland Breton
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
December 9, 2002
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0625

SAT Date: 6/26/2014

Print Date: 9/30/2014

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: Yes

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: DEVEL; IRR E, S, MM; UNCER SENSIT

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-14-0625

FATE: 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 2.50 (E) 

S = 2.88 g/L at 25 C (E)

VP = 2.6E-2 torr at 25 C (M)

BP = 247 C (NOMO5) based on 140-142 C @ 22 mm Hg (M)

H = 7.92E-8 (E)

log Koc = 2.60 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.31 (E)

log Fish BAF = 1.18 (E) 
POTW removal (%) = 0 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = low

PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is good all routs based on analogs. There is a 

concern for developmental toxicity based on nitriles. Concern for irritation to the eye, skin, 

mucus membranes and uncertain concern for sensitization based on information in MSDS.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 16.5

daphnid 48-h LC50 2.1

green algal 96-h EC50 1.5

fish _ chronic value 0.804

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.181

algal _ chronic 

value

0.53

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR 

chemical class = , MW = 182; liquid with unknown MP (P); log Kow = 2.5; S = 

2,880 mg/L at 20 C (M); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and 

nominal concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

18

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Viktor Morozov
# L_2005165EN.01000301.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 165/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 165/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 972/2005

of 24 June 2005

determining the extent to which applications for import rights lodged in respect of the quota for frozen meat of bovine animals, provided for in Regulation (EC) No 715/2005, can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 715/2005 of 12 May 2005 opening and providing for the administration of a tariff quota for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202 and products covered by CN code 0206 29 91 (1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006) (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 715/2005 fixes at 53 000 tonnes the quantity of the quota in respect of which Community importers can lodge an application for import rights based on the quantities of beef falling under CN code 0201, 0202, 0206 10 95 or 0206 29 91 imported by him/her or on his/her account under the relevant customs provisions, between 1 May 2004 and 30 April 2005. As the import rights applied for exceed the available quantity referred to in Article 1, a reduction coefficient should be fixed in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 715/2005,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Each application for import rights lodged in accordance with Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2005 shall be accepted at a rate of 18,363334 % of the import rights applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 June 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1899/2004 (OJ L 328, 31.10.2004, p. 67).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 121, 13.5.2005, p. 48.

2

---
#### William Earl LOWE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-281.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 16, 1971.

Douglas M. Midgley, Public Defender, and William J. Nelson, Asst. Public Defender, Fort Myers, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and John A. Zebedee, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Tucker v. United States, 8th Cir. 1967, 375 F.2d 363, cert. den. 389 U.S. 888, 88 S.Ct. 128, 19 L.Ed.2d 189; Mayzak v. United States, 5th Cir. 1968, 402 F.2d 152; Klingler v. United States, 8th Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 299, cert. den. 396 U.S. 859, 90 S.Ct. 127, 24 L.Ed.2d 110; United States v. Johnson, 7th Cir. 1970, 426 F.2d 1112, cert. den. 400 U.S. 842, 91 S.Ct. 86, 27 L.Ed.2d 78; Hodges v. State, Fla.App.1958, 107 So.2d 794, 69 A.L.R.2d 1091 and Hamilton v. State, Fla.App.1963, 152 So.2d 793.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.

MANN, J., dissents with opinion.

MANN, Judge

(dissenting).

When Lowe was advised of his rights he was told, “You have this right to the advice and presence of a lawyer even if you cannot afford to hire one.” So far, so good. But the interrogating officer continued, “We have no way of giving you a lawyer, but one will be appointed for you, if you wish, if and when you go to court.” That statement is grossly misleading. The state has primary concern for enforcement of the criminal laws, and Florida has a public defender system. Florida Statutes § 27.59, F.S.A. guarantees the public defender access to any person incarcerated more than forty-eight hours, whether he has been to court or not. Mayzak v. United States, *su*pra, relied on here, should be read in conjunction with Lathers v. United States, 5th Cir. 1968, 396 F.2d 524. Both opinions were written by Judge Goldberg, and Lathers is closer to this case. An FBI agent may truthfully tell a state prisoner that he has a *311right to counsel but that a federal court lacks jurisdiction to appoint counsel until charges are brought, but the admissibility of the statement depends on a showing of intelligent waiver of understood rights. If the prisoner fully understands his rights to the presence of counsel before interrogation, as Mayzak did, Miranda v. Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 is complied with. But where a man held in custody by the state is interrogated, a state officer prejudically deceives the suspect by telling him what Lowe was told.

I would reverse.
**Exhibit 13**

 

          

----

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Espírito Santo Financial Group, S.A., a company incorporated under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 30, 2004

|   | /s/   Ricardo Espírito          Santo Salgado |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Title:   Chairman of the Board and             Principal Executive and Financial    Officer |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) as an exhibit to the Report.

 

 

          

----