alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005031EN.01001701.xml

| 4.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 31/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 31/17

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 192/2005

of 3 February 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 18th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 18th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 40,889 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                           5,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                       407
<INVENTORY>                                     11,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,114
<PP&E>                                          55,238
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,412
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,629
<SALES>                                         62,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,752
<CGS>                                           37,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    17
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    48
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,071
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,587
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,447
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,447
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

**Waterfowl Identification in the Central Flyway**

##       Hooded Merganser (Fish Duck, Sawbill)    

----

**Male - Winter**
****

**Body:** Small bird, up to 1 1/4 pounds, 17 1/2 inches long.     Black body with two prominent black bars between chest and sides. White belly.     Vermiculated tan sides. Dark greenish black head with distinct hood and fan-shaped     white area. Eyes yellow. Bill blackish, narrow and serrated. Feet dull yellowish     olive. **Wings:** Lesser and middle coverts gray, greater coverts,     secondaries and tertials black and white; remainder dark. **Voice:**     Series of course *grunts.***In Flight:** Small size.     Rapid wingbeat. White head-patch and belly contrast with dark head.   

**Male - Fall**
****

 Ranging from blotchy brown, black and white to near-winter coloration. Belly     white. Hood present but lacking distinct white pattern. Eyes, feet, bill and     wings same as in winter.   

**Female - All Seasons**
****

**Body:** Dark back with chest and sides mottled gray. Belly     white. Hood rusty. Eyes yellow-brown. Narrow, serrated blackish bill with     yellow or orange tinge. Feet greenish brown. **Wings:** Similar     to male but with less white. Coverts brown instead of gray. **Voice:**     Rough *grunt.*

****

----

Previous Section
Return to Contents
Next Section

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/waterfwl/hoodedm.htm		Page Contact Information: Webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 03-Aug-2006 11:32:16 EDT		Reston, VA [vaww54]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Cygne Designs, Inc. (the  Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending January 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bernard M. Manuel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes
-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Bernard M. ManuelBernard M. ManuelChairman and Chief Executive OfficerMay 1, 2006
255 La. 502

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert L. NORWOOD v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50407.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1970.

In re: Robert L. Norwood applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
Company sanitized 

Does not contain Confidential Business 

Information (CBI)

Appendix D 

Draft Facility Report on Product Content
2010/15 PFOA Stewardship Program 

Draft Facility Report on Product Content 

I. CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION

Identify the product (e.g fluoropolymer dispersion) for which you are submitting information: 

 

 Product name:___Fluorinated Surfactant(Polymeric)_______

 

Product description (including concentrations of perfluoroalkyl chemicals 

identified in Section IV below and year of production): 

CBI.

II. COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Identify the company and location of the facility submitting information: 

 

 Company name:_AGC SEIMI CHEMICAL CO.,LTD

 

 Site location:3-2-10,Chigasaki,Chigasaki City,Kanagawa,253-8585 Japan

 :2276-2,Nada,Hirai,Kashima City,Ibaraki,314-0012 Japan

Identify a company technical contact who can respond to inquiries about the information 

submitted: 

 Technical contact:_Shunji Odaka 

 Phone: _+81-467-82-4398____

 Address: 3-2-10,Chigasaki,Chigasaki City,Kanagawa,253-8585 Japan

III. PRODUCTION

Calendar year for which you are reporting: Jan 1, 2013 to Dec 31, 2013 

 (Data reported in the report are equal to data based on year end run rate.)

Provide the amount of the product for the reporting year at each specific site: 

 

 Imported ___0____kgs/yr 

 

 Manufactured _CBI_kgs/yr (As active ingredients)

IV. PRODUCT CONTENT
A. CONCENTRATIONS OF RELEVANT PERFLUOROALKYL CHEMICALS 

Please provide the concentrations (ppb) of various perfluoroalkyl chemicals in your product. 

For chemicals for which you do not have actual data, please provide range estimates. 

CBI 

 

 

B. ANALYTICAL METHODS 

Analyses should be conducted using the most accurate instrumentation and procedures available 

as of the time of testing. Please provide detailed information on the methods used (including 

analytical standards used, sampling, sample treatment, analysis), assumptions made, 

uncertainties and detection limits (LOD, LOQ) for the data provided. 

・ PFOA content in fluorinated acrylate used as monomer was analyzed by LC-MS. 

・ 8-2 OH and 8-2 Olefin contents in fluorinated acrylate used as monomer was analyzed by GC-MS. 

CBI deleted.
# L_2005335EN.01005701.xml

| 21.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 335/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 335/57

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUPOL KINSHASA/2/2005

of 22 November 2005

extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the EU Police Mission in Kinshasa (DRC), EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’

(2005/921/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 25(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2004/847/CFSP of 9 December 2004 on the European Union Police Mission in Kinshasa (DRC) regarding the Integrated Police Unit (EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’) (1), and in particular Article 5 and 8 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 9 December 2004, the Political and Security Committee adopted Decision EUPOL Kinshasa/1/2004 (2) appointing Mr Adílio Custódio as Head of Mission of EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 9 December 2004, the Political and Security Committee adopted Decision EUPOL Kinshasa/1/2004 (2) appointing Mr Adílio Custódio as Head of Mission of EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’.

| (2) | The abovementioned Decision expires on 31 December 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The abovementioned Decision expires on 31 December 2005.

| (3) | On 7 November 2005 the Council agreed to extend EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’ for a further period of 12 months. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 7 November 2005 the Council agreed to extend EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’ for a further period of 12 months.

| (4) | The Secretary—General/High Representative has proposed the extension of the mandate of Mr Adílio Custódio as Head of Mission of EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’ until the end of the Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Secretary—General/High Representative has proposed the extension of the mandate of Mr Adílio Custódio as Head of Mission of EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’ until the end of the Mission.

| (5) | The mandate of the Head of Mission of EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’ should therefore be extended until the end of the Mission, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The mandate of the Head of Mission of EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’ should therefore be extended until the end of the Mission,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The mandate of Mr Adílio Custódio as Head of Mission of EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’ is hereby extended until the end of the Mission.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply until the end of the Mission EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’.

Done at Brussels, 22 November 2005.

For the Political and Security Committee

The President

J. KING

---

(1)  
  OJ L 367, 14.12.2004, p. 30.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 396, 31.12.2004, p. 61.

2

---
Mission: Improving transportation to and within federal and tribal lands by providing technical services to the highway transportation community. This report only includes fiscal year (FY) 2013, FY 2014 and FY 2015, for updated 

information please visit: http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/fedlands-newjersey.aspx

If you have any questions please contact: Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager 571-434-1543, Jacinda.Russell@dot.govProgramming Decision Committee (PDC) members: Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, Jacinda.Russell@dot.govDavid Kuhn, State Representative david.kuhn@dot.state.nj.usFrank Scarantino, Local Representative OCEngineering@co.ocean.nj.us

New Jersey 

Federal Lands Access Program (FLA

P) 

Improving access to and within federal and tribal lands

FLAP Project Selection Process

The PDC establiincluded prefere “Shovel Re

Programmin(PDC) ranki

 Projects that 

investments new project 

0K 0K 0K

213K

428K

638K

2013 2014 2015

Obligations Allocations

Each FLAP project is selected from a pool of applications submitted by the facility owner in response to a state-wide call for projects. The applications are screened, rated, and ranked using PDC approved rating criteria. The PDC unanimously agreed which projects met the established State program goals and conformed with the project ranking criteria contained in the “Call for Projects SOP”. Based upon these evaluations, the proposed projects are recommended for programming within the available funding for each state. Memorandum of Agreements (MOA) are coordinated and executed for each programmed project prior to obligation of FLAP funds. There was one call for projects that generated 2 applications totaling $475,618 funds requested, however, one application was disqualified and the other could not determine the delivery agent. 

MAP-21 Funding Authorized: FY 2013: $212,971 FY 2014: $214,570 FY 2015: $210,269 Federal land acreage for the five core FLMAs: 3.14% Federal public road miles: 96.9 Number of Federal public bridges: 7 Recreational visitation: 5,236,266 visitors per year
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 30, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 30, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0115. WILLIAM J. ROSS et al. v. TRAVIS HAMPTON . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2011CV2495
#### BUCKLEY TOWERS CONDOMINIUM, INC., etc., Appellant, v. Herbert BUCHWALD, etc., Appellee.

No. 50797.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 12, 1978.

Joseph S. Paglino, Miami, for appellant.

Darrey A. Davis, of Steel, Hector & Davis, Miami, for appellee.

*869BOYD, Justice.

The motion to dismiss was correctly granted by the trial court because Section 711.231, Florida Statutes, does not apply to leases entered before enactment of the statute. *Fleeman v. Case,*342 So.2d 815 (Fla.1977). Since the statute has prospective application only, it was unnecessary for the learned circuit judge to rule upon its constitutionality in this case.

Accordingly, that portion of the court’s order dismissing the suit is affirmed and that portion declaring the statute unconstitutional is quashed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27808]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, November 17, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-27808 Filed 10-16-97; 1:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ESS Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
L. Blair, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and our result of operations.


March 31, 2003

                                                   /s/ROBERT L. BLAIR
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                     ROBERT L. BLAIR
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3413 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3413

  To reinstate pilots fired or forced to resign because of a COVID-19 
                            vaccine mandate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 2023

Mr. Marshall (for himself and Mr. Braun) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reinstate pilots fired or forced to resign because of a COVID-19 
                            vaccine mandate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATING PILOTS FIRED OR FORCED TO RESIGN BECAUSE OF A 
              COVID-19 VACCINE MANDATE.

    Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall take such 
actions as are necessary to require air carriers to reinstate any pilot 
who was fired or forced to resign because of a COVID-19 vaccine 
mandate.
                                 <all>
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00444

- CV
VIRGILIO PEÑA v. NEXT HOME RGV REALTY, LLC AND VERONICA L. ONTIVEROS
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CL

- 21

- 3711

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH CO URT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal will be taxed against the party incurring the same

. We further order this decision certi fied below for observance. January 19, 2023
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly report of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Koos, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  July 12, 2009


By:
/s/ David KoosDavid KoosChief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. and will be retained by Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In Re a MINOR CHILD

High Court of American Samoa Trial Division

JR No. 46-93

September 21, 1993

Before RICHMOND, Associate Justice, VAIVAO, Associate Judge, and MAILO, Associate Judge.

Counsel: For Petitioners, Tautai A.F. Fa'alevao

In this proceeding, the natural parents petitioned to relinquish their parental rights and obligations to their five-months old daughter and allow for the child’s adoption by her maternal grandparents. An evidentiary hearing was conducted on September 10, 1993.

The interested parties, child, parents and grandparents, live in the same household. The parents were married shortly after their daughter’s birth. Both are in their twenties, are educated, and recently acquired employment. Their prospects for the future are bright.

The grandfather is 63 years old and retired. The grandmother is 65 years of age and also retired. They enjoy a substantial retirement income from pensions, Social Security benefits, and contributions from sons overseas.

*12The interested parties are also promoting a loving, caring relationship between granddaughter and grandparents. Eventually, however, complete and intimate familial contacts between the child and her parents will be essential. Legal disruption of the child’s parental relations is not in her present, long-term best interests.

This petition should be and is properly denied.

It is so ordered.