55178 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 205 / Thursday, October 23, 1997 / Rules and Regulations

KENTUCKY-OZONE—CONTINUED

Designated area

Designation Classification

Date 1 Type Date 1 Type

KY 53 and Zale Smith Road; proceeding on Ky 53 to the

north-northwest to the junction of New Moody Lane and Ky

53; proceeding on New Moody Lane to the south-southwest until meeting the city limits of La Grange; then briefly

proceeding north following the La Grange city limits to the

intersection of the northbound lane of Interstate 71 and the

La Grange city limits; proceeding southwest on the northbound lane of Interstate 71 until inter-secting with the

North Fork of Currys Fork; proceeding south-southwest beyond the con-fluence of Currys Fork to the south-southwest beyond the confluence of Floyds Fork continuing on

to the Oldham-Jefferson County Line; proceeding northwest along the Oldham-Jefferson County Line to the beginning; unless a road or intersection of two or more roads

defines the nonattainment boundary, the area shall extend

outward 750 feet from the center of the road or intersection.

Nonattainment ............... Moderate.2

* * * * * * *

1This date is November 15, 1990, unless otherwise noted.

2Attainment date extended to November 15, 1997.

* * * * *

3. In § 81.315, the ‘‘Indiana—Ozone’’

table is amended by revising the entry

for the ‘‘Louisville Area’’ and adding

footnote 2 to read as follows:

§ 81.315 Indiana.

* * * * *

INDIANA-OZONE

Designated area

Designation Classification

Date 1 Type Date 1 Type

* * * * * * *

Louisville Area:

Clark County ..................................................... Nonattainment Moderate 2 .....................

Floyd County ..................................................... Nonattainment Moderate 2 .....................

* * * * * * *

1This date is November 15, 1990, unless otherwise noted.

2Attainment date extended to November 15, 1997.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 97–28141 Filed 10–22–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[FRL–65912–5]

National Oil and Hazardous

Substances Contingency Plan;

National Priorities List Update

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of deletion of the

LaGrand Sanitary Landfill Superfund

Site from the National Priorities List

(NPL).

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) announces the deletion of

the LaGrand Sanitary Landfill

Superfund Site in Minnesota from the

National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL

is Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 which

is the National Oil and Hazardous

Substances Contingency Plan (NCP),

which EPA promulgated pursuant to

Section 105 of the Comprehensive

Environmental Response,

Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980

(CERCLA), as amended. This action is

being taken by EPA and the State of

Minnesota, because it has been

determined that all appropriate Fundfinanced response actions under

CERCLA have been implemented and

that no further response by responsible

parties is appropriate. Moreover, EPA

and the State of Minnesota have

determined that remedial actions

conducted at the site to date remain

protective of public health, welfare, and

the environment.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 23, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gladys Beard at (312) 886–7253 (SR–6J),

Associate Remedial Project Manager,

Superfund Division, U.S. EPA—Region

V, 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL

60604. Information on the site is

available at the local information

repository located at: The Alexandria

Public Library, Seventh and Fillmore,

Alexandria, MN 56308. Requests for

comprehensive copies of documents

should be directed formally to the

Regional Docket Office. The contact for

the Regional Docket Office is Jan

Pfundheller (H–7J), U.S. EPA, Region V,

77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604,

(312) 353–5821.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 205 / Thursday, October 23, 1997 / Rules and Regulations 55179

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The site to

be deleted from the NPL is: LaGrand

Sanitary landfill Superfund Site located

in Douglas County, Minnesota. A notice

of intent to delete for this site was

published September 5, 1997 (62 FR

46938). The closing date for comments

on the Notice of Intent to Delete was

October 4, 1997. EPA received no

comments and therefore no

Responsiveness Summary was prepared.

The EPA identifies sites which appear

to present a significant risk to public

health, welfare, or the environment and

it maintains the NPL as the list of those

sites. Sites on the NPL may be the

subject of Hazardous Substance

Response Trust Fund (Fund) financed

remedial actions. Any site deleted from

the NPL remains eligible for Fundfinanced remedial actions in the

unlikely event that conditions at the site

warrant such action. Section

300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that

Fund-financed actions may be taken at

sites deleted from the NPL in the

unlikely event that conditions at the site

warrant such action. Deletion of a site

from the NPL does not affect responsible

party liability or impede agency efforts

to recover costs associated with

response efforts.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous

substances, Hazardous waste,

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Superfund, Water

pollution control, Water supply.

Dated: October 9, 1997.

David Ullrich,

Acting Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA,

Region V.

40 CFR part 300 is amended as

follows:

PART 300—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 300

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.

9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,

1991 Comp.; p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,

3 CFR, 1987 Comp.; p. 193.

Appendix B—[Amended]

2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300

is amended by removing the Site

‘‘LaGrande Sanitary Landfill, LaGrand

Township, Minnesota’’.

[FR Doc. 97–27847 Filed 10–22–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 52

[CC Docket No. 92–237, CC Docket No. 95–

155; FCC 97–372]

Administration of the North American

Numbering Plan; Toll Free Service

Access Codes

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: On October 9, 1997, the

Commission released a Third Report

and Order in CC Docket No. 92–237

adopting various measures related to

numbering administration for

telecommunications service and to

billing and collection to support

numbering administration activities.

The Third Report and Order is intended

to ensure the impartial allocation and

administration of numbering resources.

The Commission also released a Third

Report and Order in CC Docket No. 95–

155 adopting measures related to

numbering administration for toll free

numbers. The Third Report and Order is

intended to ensure the impartial

allocation and administration of toll free

numbering resources.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 24, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marian Gordon or Erin Duffy, Network

Services Division, Common Carrier

Bureau, (202) 418–2320.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

summarizes the Commission’s Third

Report and Order in CC Docket No. 92–

237, In the Matter of Administration of

the North American Numbering Plan,

FCC 97–372, adopted October 9, 1997,

and released October 9, 1997. The

Commission concurrently released a

Third Report and Order in CC Docket

No. 95–155, In the Matter of Toll Free

Service Access Codes. The file is

available for inspection and copying

during the weekday hours of 9 a.m. to

4:30 p.m. in the Commission’s

Reference Center, room 239, 1919 M St.,

N.W., Washington D.C., or copies may

be purchased from the Commission’s

duplicating contractor, ITS, Inc. 2100 M

St., N.W., Suite 140, Washington, D.C.

20037, phone (202) 857–3800.

Analysis of Proceeding

1. In the Third Report and Order in

CC Docket No. 92–237, the Commission

takes several actions to ensure the

impartial administration and allocation

of numbering resources. The

Commission accepts the

recommendation of the North American

Numbering Council (NANC) and selects

Lockheed IMS as the North American

Numbering Plan Administrator

(NANPA). The Commission accepts the

NANC’s recommendation and selects

the National Exchange Carriers

Association (NECA) as the NANPA

Billing and Collection Agent (B&C

Agent), subject to a specific neutrality

cure. The Commission accepts NANC’s

proposed rules for governance of the

NANPA and the B&C Agent, with minor

modifications. In order to provide

solutions to numbering disputes when

time is critical, the Commission

streamlines its administrative processes

of review of NANC’s initial resolution of

numbering disputes.

2. The Commission imposes two

conditions, recommended by the NANC,

that Lockheed must follow. First,

Lockheed must perform the numbering

administration functions currently

performed by Bellcore, and the central

office code administration functions

currently performed by the eleven

central office code administrators, at the

price agreed to at the time of its

selection. The new NANPA may request

from the NANC, with approval by the

Commission, an adjustment in this price

if the actual number of central office

code assignments made per year, the

number of area codes requiring relief

per year, or the number of area code

relief meetings per area code exceeds

120% of Lockheed’s stated assumptions

at the time of its selection. Second,

Lockheed must make available any and

all intellectual property and associated

hardware resulting from its activities as

numbering administrator including, but

not limited to, systems and the data

contained therein, software, interface

specifications and supporting

documentation, and make such property

available to whomever the NANC

directs free of charge.

3. In the Third Report and Order in

CC Docket No. 95–155, the Commission

takes action to ensure the impartial

administration and allocation of toll free

numbering resources. The Commission

concludes that toll free numbering

administration, as currently structured,

is inconsistent with section 251(e) of the

Communications Act. The Commission

directs the NANC to examine the issue

of toll free numbering administration

and make a recommendation to the

Commission regarding what entity

would be an appropriate administrator

for the toll free database within 120

days of the effective date of the NANP

Order.

4. It is ordered, pursuant to Sections

1, 4(i), 201–205, 218, and 251 of the

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 151, 154(i),