alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Merrill J. Forgotson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ernest
J. Verrico, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Merrill J. Forgotson |  | /s/ Ernest J. Verrico  
|Merrill J. Forgotson     |  | Ernest J. Verrico      
|Chief Executive Officer  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|May 13, 2005             |  | May 13, 2005           



The foregoing certificate is furnished
solely for purposes of complying with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any of the Companys previous filings under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the Companys future filings, including this Report on Form 10-QSB, in whole or in part, this Certificate shall not be incorporated by reference
into any such filings.
#### David COHEN and Minnie Cohen, Husband and Wife, Petitioners, v. SARASOTA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44288.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 22, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 280 So.2d 717.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Hillward J. FRUGE.

No. 60294.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1977.

In re: Hillward J. Fruge applying for writ of certiorari or review.

*673Writ denied. We find no error of law in the ruling of the trial judge.
**Exhibit23.1**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement No. 333-108941 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March11, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial statement scheduleof Washington Group International, Inc. (which report expressed an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s plan ofreorganization) and management’s report of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofWashington Group International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

 
| /s/ DELOITTE &  TOUCHE LLP |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Deloitte & Touche  LLP     |   |
| Boise, Idaho                   |   |
| March 14, 2005                 |   |

 

1

----
- r-ARTMEHT 01-

VA^iPPORT/VIION 

jCKEt 0FERM10M3 

\\ ^;^V 15 P !• 02 

CITY OF 

JONESBORO 

November 7, 2011 

Dennis J. DeVany 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Dennis J. DeVany: 

Thank you for the update you submitted to us on October 24th 2011. I believe that the 

continuance of the air transportation service is essential to Jonesboro's grov\/th. As the city 

continues to grow and prosper this service will become exceedingly relevant. Although I 

understand the subject matter of this letter is for comments, I would like to take this 

opportunity to state that the City of Jonesboro would accept the offer of Air Choice One. 

Thank you again for the update and I look forward to hearing a decision in the near future. 

Sincerely, 

Harold Perrin 

Mayor 

HP/clg 

Executive Ojfice -City Hall • P.O. Box 1845 • Jonesboro, Arkansas 72403-1845 • (870) 932-1052 • FAX: (870) 933-4619
Step 1                    Identify                    Stakeholders                

                    Step 2                    Use                    Safety Data                

                    Step 3                    Choose Proven                    Solutions                

                    Step 4                    Implement                    Solutions                

                    Finish Line                

# Education Videos

Content will open in a new window

## Tools and Resources

Guides
              - Implementing a LRSP

Training
              - Tutorial - Implement Solutions
              - Systemic Approach Training – Part 3

Webinars
              - LRSP Part #1: LRSP Implementation
              - LRSP Part #2: A Roadmap to Getting Home Safely
              - Implementing a Local Road Safety Plan
              - Local Safety Funding Options
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27810]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, November 10, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-27810 Filed 10-16-97; 12:32 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,787
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,103
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,135
<PP&E>                                         469,694
<DEPRECIATION>                                 192,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,025,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,043
<BONDS>                                        777,627
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          158,757
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           419
<OTHER-SE>                                   (152,553)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,025,547
<SALES>                                         61,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               610,187
<CGS>                                           39,072
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  721,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (407)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,306
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (235,539)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (63,055)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (186,739)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (172,484)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.47)


</TABLE>
AEE

- 13

- 132

- E February 19, 2013

Exemption No. 10710 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 03

- 1 5405

Mr. Steve Boyce

Director of Maintenance Aero Air, LLC

2050 NE 25 th Avenue Hillsboro, OR 97124

Dear Mr. Boyce :

Thi s letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to amend Exemption No. 9463, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

On November 5, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Aero Air, LLC dba Erickson Aero Tanker (Aero) for an amendment to Exemption No. 9463, as amended. That exemption from § 36.1581(d) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Butler Aircraft Company to operate its Dougla s DC

- 6 and Douglas DC

- 7 aircraft in aerial fire suppression operations at landing weights greater than the maximum landing weight for the aircraft in Butler’s operating limitations and up to the aircraft’s design maximum landing weight.

The amendment you request would change the company name from Butler Aircraft Company to Aero Air, LLC.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register

. T he requested amendment to the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Aero Air, LLC

.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9463, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exempti on. Therefore, pursuant to the authority

contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701 , de legated to me by the Administrator, Exemption No. 9463 is hereby granted.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision to amend Exemption No. 9463, as amended, is hereby grant ed by changing the company name identified on the exemption to Aero Air, LLC

. The exemption allow s Aero Air, LLC to operate its Douglas DC

- 6 and Douglas DC

- 7 aircraft in aerial fire suppression operations at landing weights greater than the maximum landin g weight for the aircraft in its operating limitations and up to the aircraft’s design maximum landing weight.

This exemption covers only firefighting operations under contracts to U. S. Government and state agencies. The exemption applies to aircraft i dentified as N401US (DC

- 7), N6353C (DC

7), N6318C (DC

- 7), N75 6Z (DC

- 7BF ) , N8502R (DC

- 54E), N90739 (DC

- 6) , and N838D (DC

- 7B)

.

This exemption is effective immediately and remains valid unless superseded or rescinded. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9463.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lourdes Maurice Executive Director, Environment and

Energy
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-113500) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-119607, 333-105842, 333-49852, 333-49856,333-97523, and 333-97527) of Dyax Corp. of our report dated March 1, 2005relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K.

 

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                           |   |
| Boston, Massachusetts          |   |
| March 1, 2005                  |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28906]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Revocation of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Final Order of the United States 
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, entered August 
15, 1997, the United States Small Business Administration hereby 
revokes the license of Salween Financial Services, Inc., a Pennsylvania 
corporation, to function as a small business investment company under 
the Small Business Investment Company License No. 03/03-5157 issued to 
Salween Financial Services, Inc. on July 1, 1983 and said license is 
hereby declared null and void as of October 15, 1997.

United States Small Business Administration.

    Dated: October 15, 1997.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 97-28906 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

TN-24 Land Btw Lakes SR 461 Roadway Resurfacing Forest Service - Land 

Between the Lakes

TN Department 

of Transportation Stewart

2017-

2018

TN-27 Walker Road Repairs Roadway Reconstruction

Fish and Wildlife Service - 

Cross Creeks National 

Wildlife Refuge

Stewart County Stewart

2018-

2019

TN-28

Bellwood Hollow & Bellwood 

Landing Road Roadway Reconstruction

Fish and Wildlife Service - 

Cross Creeks National 

Wildlife Refuge

Stewart County Stewart

2018-

2019

TN-29 New Sheboss Road Roadway 

Resurfacing/Widening 

National Park Service - 

Natchez Trace Parkway Hickman County Hickman 2020

TN-31 Keg Springs Road Roadway 

Resurfacing/Widening 

National Park Service - 

Natchez Trace Parkway Lewis County Lewis 2020

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Tennessee Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Tennessee FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Tennessee Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2017-2020
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

TN-32 Piney Road Roadway 

Resurfacing/Widening 

National Park Service - 

Natchez Trace Parkway Wayne County Wayne 2020

TN-37 Nemo Bridge Restoration

Bridge Rehabilitation for 

Bicycle/Pedestrian 

Facility

National Park Service - 

Obed Wild & Scenic River

TN Department 

of Environment 

and Conservation

Morgan 2019

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

Tennessee Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2017-2020

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The Tennessee PDC does not have a firm date for the 

next Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please bookmark our webpage to watch for future calls in your state. 

https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/flap/

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 58937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-221, RM-9181]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Satellite Beach, FL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by 
Satellite Beach Community Broadcasters proposing the allotment of 
Channel 253A at Satellite Beach, Florida, as that community's first 
local FM broadcast service. The channel can be allotted to Satellite 
Beach without a site restriction at coordinates 28-10-24 and 80-36-12.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before December 15, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before December 30, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Richard J. Hayes, Jr., 
13809 Black Meadow Road, Spotsylvania, Virginia 22553.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-221, adopted October 15, 
1997, and released October 24, 1997. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, 
NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-28888 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
255 La. 1095

#### STATE of Louisiana v. William H. MATTHEWS.

No. 50557.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1970.

In re: William H. Matthews applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
#### Rosa WALLS v. ESTATE of Pearl GORDON.

No. 49762.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 7, 1977.

Wells & Blalock, Tim David Blalock, Calvin B. Wells, Natchez, for appellant.

George F. West, Jr., Forrest A. Johnson, Clyde W. Mullins, Natchez, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Adams County; Fred C. Berger, Chancellor.

Before SMITH, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
### PlatteValleyBank 1212 CircleDrive P. 0.Box 2308 Scottsbluff,NE 69363-2308 Phone: 308-632-7004 Fax: 308-635-7405

October

### 29, 2014
United States Department ofTransportation Attn: Mr. Michael F. Martin 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 DearMr. Martin, Website: www.pvbank.com 

# -- .; :

Pi/Iqe

**;V(lll~y** qompanies

MEMBERS FDIC



### . ·,_ NEBRASKA: Scottsbluff• Morrill • Minatare • Bridgeport WYOMING: Torrington • Wheatland• Casper

Email: info@pvbank.com

This letter is in reference to a pending Essential Air Service bid for the Western Nebraska Regional Airport. I attended the public meeting of the Western Nebraska Regional Airport Authority Board on the morning ofOctober 

### 22"d. At the meeting, the four submitted bids were reviewed and an extensive gathering of public input took place. After all ofthe questions had been answered and comments considered, the Airport Authority Board votedto accept theEssential Air Service bid ofAerodynamics, Inc. I strongly support the Board's selection of Aerodynamics, Inc. to provide air services for our community. This support is based primarily on the need for our Airport to have a service provider that can provide reliable and cost effective airline services to passengers travelling to and from the area. In relation to reliability, I have had many personal experiences with individuals encountering significant difficulties traveling to and from our area for prospective business activities. This is due to the extremely high frequency ofcancelled flights in2013 and 20 14 by the current EAS provider. These cancellationshave resulted in our community having very low confidence that they will be able to reach their destination in a timely and reliable manner usingthe current EAS provider. Withtheir dedicated plane and new commitmentto our region, Ibelieve that Aerodynamics, Inc. canhelp to reestablish the t'eliability ofair travel to and from Scottsbluff. The cost effectiveness ofour EAS provider is also a reason for my support. We are approximately 210 miles from the Denver International Airport so itis critical to have a service provider that canrealistically price flights to and from Scottsbluff. Based on

**th~** information shared by Aerodynamics, Inc. at the public meeting I believe that the cost structure they will have in place will be very reasonable with a good likelihood of increasing the.volume ofpassengers significantly overtime. In summary, based on the information, questions, and comments made at the recent public meeting I fully support the WesternNebraskaRegional Airport Authority Board's selectionofAerodynamics, Inc. as their EAS provider. I hope that you will see fit to confirm the selection ofthat company for our local EAS provider to improve the reliability and cost effectiveness ofair services to and from our community. Please feel free 

### to contactme ifyouhave any questions.



# ~#--

ChiefOperating Officer
CITY OF PH ILADELPHIA Department of Public Health

Environmental Protection Division Air Management Services



### InterOffice Memo

To: File

From: Noelle Helmstetter

Date: April 30, 2014

Subject: 8-Hour RACT Analysis for Inolex Chemical Company

Introduction:

The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that moderate (or worse) ozone nonattainment areas implement reasonably available control technology (RACT) controls on all major sources of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx). Philadelphia County is part of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City moderate ozone nonattainment area for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This document presents the findings of a RACT evaluation for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for this facility.

Company Description:

Inolex Chemical Company is located at Jackson and Swanson St., Philadelphia, PA 19148. The facility is a chemical manufacturing facility.

Applicability for NOx and VOC RACT:

Inolex Chemical Company is a major source of NOx having potential emissions greater than 100 tons per year, the major source threshold in Philadelphia County that is applicable to NOx RACT for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.

Inolex Chemical Company is not a major source of VOC ha ving potential emissions less than 50 tons per year, the major source threshold in Philadelphia County that is applicable to VOC RACT for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.

Process Descriptions:

The facility’s air emissions sources contribut ing to NOx emissions include the following:

 One (1) 49 MMBtu/Hr. boiler burning No. 6 oil/waste oil/natural gas and is equipped with low NOx

burners

o Unit ID: “Boiler #2”;

 One (1) 20 MMBtu/hr. boiler burning No. 6 oil/No.5 oil/natural gas

o Unit ID: “Boiler #3”;

 One (1) 6.5 MMBtu/Hr. boiler burning No. 2 oil/natural gas

o Unit ID: “Hot Oil Boiler”;

Presumptive RACT:

The three boilers are covered by presumptive RACT re gulations (25 PA Code 129.93), as specified in the “Presumptive RACT regulation” column of the table below.

Boilers

Unit Heat Input (BTU/Hr) Fuel Burned Presumptive RACT Regulation
Boiler #3 20,000,000 No. 6 oil, No. 5 oil & Natural Gas 25 PA Code 129.93(b)(2)

Boiler #2 49,000,000 No. 6 oil, Waste oil & Natural Gas 25 PA Code 129.93(b)(2)

Hot Oil Boiler 6,500,000 No. 2 oil & Natural Gas 25 PA Code 129.93(c )(1)For Boiler #2 and Boiler #3, the presumptive RACT requir ements are the performance of annual adjustments or tune-ups of the boilers, and keeping corresponding records.

For Hot Oil Boiler, the presumptive RACT requirements are the installation, operation, and maintenance of the boiler as per the manufacturer’s specifications.

Case-by-Case RACT:

None.

Conclusions and Recommendations:

All NOx emitting sources are covered by presumptive RACT.

1 / 9 / 1 5

Edward Wiener, Chief of Source Registration Date