T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T CO N D A LEE M O RRI S, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. J . S A N D O V A L , RN ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 55735 D. C. No . 3 : 1 0 - c v - 0 1 3 0 5 - J AH - NLS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . H ous t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t14, 2013 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , G R A B E R , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner C on dal ee M orri s app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g th a t d e f e n d an ts w e r e de l i be r a t e l yi ndi f

f e r e ntt o hi s s e r i ous m e di c a l ne e ds . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED AU G 20 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 55735 2 u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . Kn i e v e l v . ES PN, 393 F . 3d 1068, 1 0 7 2 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 5 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed M orri s’ s a ct i on because M orri s f ai l ed t o a l l e ge f

a c t s de m ons tr a t i ng tha tde f e nda nt s kne w of

a nd di s r e gar de d an e xc e s s i ve r is kto h is h e a lth o rf

a ile dto p r o v id e h im w ith p r o m p t m e d ic a l tr e a tm e n t. Se e J e tt v. P enner , 43 9 F . 3d 10 91 , 10 96 (9th C i r. 20 06 ) ( t o est abl i sh del i bera t e i nd i ff er ence b a s e do n ad e layin tr e a tm e n t, ap r is o n e rm u s t s h o w th a t th e d e layr e s u lte din further s i gn i fi canti nj ury or the un nece ss ary and w ant on i nfl i ct i on of pai n); T oguc hiv . Chung , 3 9 1 F .3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) ( ap r is o n o f f ic ia l is d el i b erat el y i n d i fferen to n l y i f h e o r sh e k n o w s o f an dd i sreg ard s an ex cessi v e ri sk t o an i nm at e’ s hea l th). T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d is m is s in g w ith o u t le a v e to a m e nd be c aus e the de f

i c i e nc i e s i n M orr i s ’ s c om pl a i ntc oul d notbe c ur e d by a m e n d m e n t. See L op ez v . Sm ith , 20 3 F . 3d 11 22 , 11 30 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( en banc) ( s e tt i ng f orth s t anda r d of

r e vi e w and e xpl a i ni ng tha tl e a ve t o a m e nd s houl d be gi ven u nl es s the defi ci enci es i n the com pl ai ntcann otbe cured by amend m ent ). M o rr is ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt s h o u ldh av e a llo w e dd is c o v e ryis u n p e r s u a s iv e .12- 55735 3 D e f e n d an ts ’ r e q u e s t to s tr ik e p o rtio n s o f M o rr is ’s o p e n in g b r ie f , s e t f o rth in the i rans w e r i ng br i e f

, i s de ni e d. AF F I RME D.