alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3687 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3687

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To direct the Office for Victims of Crime of the Department of Justice 
    to implement anti-trafficking recommendations of the Government 
                         Accountability Office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Child Trafficking Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act, the term ``anti-trafficking recommendations'' means 
the recommendations set forth in the report of the Government 
Accountability Office entitled ``Child Trafficking: Addressing 
Challenges to Public Awareness and Survivor Support'', which was 
published on December 11, 2023.

SEC. 3. IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTI-TRAFFICKING PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Office for Victims of Crime of the 
Department of Justice, in coordination with the Office on Trafficking 
in Persons of the Administration for Children and Families, shall 
implement the anti-trafficking recommendations.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 60 days after the date on which the 
Office for Victims of Crime implements the anti-trafficking 
recommendations pursuant to subsection (a), the Director of the Office 
for Victims of Crime shall submit a report to the Committee on the 
Judiciary of the Senate and Committee on the Judiciary of the House of 
Representatives that explicitly describes the steps taken by the Office 
to complete such implementation.

            Passed the Senate April 20 (legislative day, April 19), 
      2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3687

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To direct the Office for Victims of Crime of the Department of Justice 
    to implement anti-trafficking recommendations of the Government 
                         Accountability Office.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0251

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

AMIEL JON GARDIPE JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 23, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 13 2023

02/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0251
AAM-13-415-E

June 24, 2013

 Exemption No. 10805

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0511

Mr. Ethan D. Nasalroad

Midland Aircraft Sales & Service, Inc.

P.O. Box 986

2901 Rusty Wallace Drive

Newton, Iowa 50208

Dear Mr. Nasalroad:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 24, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Midland Aircraft Sales and Service, Inc. (Midland Aircraft) for an exemption from 

part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow 

Midland Aircraft to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing 

program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Midland Aircraft.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing 

programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of 
2

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was 

unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Midland Aircraft Sales and Services, Inc. an exemption 

from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Midland Aircraft to cover its safetysensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and 

limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Midland Aircraft are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of 

the Midland Aircraft part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Frederick E. Tilton, M.D.

Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3470 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3470

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to permit a State 
 to include as part of the mail voter registration form a requirement 
 that applicants provide proof of citizenship, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2023

 Mrs. Britt (for herself, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Cruz, Mrs. 
 Capito, Mr. Wicker, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, and Mr. Hagerty) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                        Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to permit a State 
 to include as part of the mail voter registration form a requirement 
 that applicants provide proof of citizenship, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Citizen Ballot Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTENTS OF STATE MAIL VOTER REGISTRATION FORM.

    (a) In General.--Section 6(a) of the National Voter Registration 
Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20505(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``Federal Election Commission'' and 
                inserting ``Election Assistance Commission''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, except that a State may, in 
                addition to the criteria stated in section 9(b), 
                require that an applicant provide proof that the 
                applicant is a citizen of the United States'' after 
                ``elections for Federal office''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``and such form may 
        include a requirement that the applicant provide proof that the 
        applicant is a citizen of the United States'' after ``elections 
        for Federal office''.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3544 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 603
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3544

To designate the visitor and education center at Fort McHenry National 
  Monument and Historic Shrine as the ``Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and 
                          Education Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2023

 Mr. Cardin (for himself and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           November 21, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Manchin, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the visitor and education center at Fort McHenry National 
  Monument and Historic Shrine as the ``Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and 
                          Education Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PAUL S. SARBANES VISITOR AND EDUCATION 
              CENTER.

    (a) Designation.--The visitor and education center at Fort McHenry 
National Monument and Historic Shrine located at 2400 East Fort Ave, 
Baltimore, Maryland, is designated as the ``Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor 
and Education Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other document of the United States to the visitor center 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and Education Center''.
                                                       Calendar No. 603

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3544

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the visitor and education center at Fort McHenry National 
  Monument and Historic Shrine as the ``Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and 
                          Education Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 21, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3537 

To require the Secretary of Education to disclose information about career 

and technical education and funding under the Carl D. Perkins Career 

and Technical Education Act of 2006, and require FAFSA applications 

to include a career and technical education acknowledgment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Education to disclose information 

about career and technical education and funding under 

the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education 

Act of 2006, and require FAFSA applications to include 

a career and technical education acknowledgment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CTE Awareness Act’’. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3537 IS

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE ON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

2 WEBSITE. 

3 The Secretary of Education (acting through the Of4 fice of Federal Student Aid of the Department of Edu5 cation) shall— 

6 (1) not later than 60 days after the date of en7 actment of this Act, publish on the public website of 

8 the Office of Federal Student Aid information on— 

9 (A) career and technical education pro10 grams, including average completion time, pro11 gram cost, and post-graduation employment 

12 rate; and 

13 (B) opportunities in each State— 

14 (i) to pursue such programs; and 

15 (ii) for funding to pursue such pro16 grams under the Carl D. Perkins Career 

17 and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 

18 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.); and 

19 (2) continuously update and maintain the infor20 mation published under paragraph (1) to ensure 

21 that such information continues to be relevant. 

22 SEC. 3. DISCLOSURE ON FAFSA APPLICATION. 

23 Section 494(a)(1)(A) of the Higher Education Act of 

24 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1098h(a)(1)(A)) is amended— 

25 (1) in clause (i)(II), by striking ‘‘and’’ after the 

26 semicolon; and 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3537 IS

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(iii) career and technical education 

3 (as defined in section 3 of the Carl D. Per4 kins Career and Technical Education Act 

5 of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2302)) programs are a 

6 viable alternative to a 4-year degree, and 

7 include, to ensure such individuals are 

8 made aware of such programs and related 

9 career paths at the beginning of the appli10 cation— 

11 ‘‘(I) a one-page summary of the 

12 most recent information provided 

13 under section 3(1) of the CTE Aware14 ness Act; and 

15 ‘‘(II) an acknowledgment signa16 ture box; and’’. 

17 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. 

18 The terms ‘‘career and technical education’’ and 

19 ‘‘State’’ have the meanings given the terms in section 3 

20 of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education 

21 Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2302). 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 22, 2010 | By:      /s/ SANDRINE CRISAFULLI |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                         |                             |
|                         | Sandrine      Crisafulli         |
|                         |                             |
|                         | Chief      Financial Officer     |

----
# L_2005031EN.01007201.xml

| 4.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 31/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 31/72

---

COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2005/98/CFSP

of 2 February 2005

extending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 14, 18(5) and 23(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 8 December 2003 the Council adopted Joint Action 2003/870/CFSP (1) amending and extending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 8 December 2003 the Council adopted Joint Action 2003/870/CFSP (1) amending and extending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

| (2) | On 26 July 2004 the Council adopted Joint Action 2004/565/CFSP (2), appointing Mr Michael Sahlin as the European Union Special Representative in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 26 July 2004 the Council adopted Joint Action 2004/565/CFSP (2), appointing Mr Michael Sahlin as the European Union Special Representative in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

| (3) | On the basis of a review of Joint Action 2003/870/CFSP, the mandate of the Special Representative should be extended for a further 6 months, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of a review of Joint Action 2003/870/CFSP, the mandate of the Special Representative should be extended for a further 6 months,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

The mandate of Mr Michael SAHLIN as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, as set out in Joint Action 2003/870/CFSP, is hereby extended until 31 August 2005.

Article 2

Article 5(1) of Joint Action 2003/870/CFSP shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR shall be EUR 500 000’.

Article 3

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Article 4

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 February 2005.

For the Council

The President

J. ASSELBORN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 326, 13.12.2003, p. 39.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 251, 27.7.2004, p. 18.

2

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00029-CV

Brenda Lund, in her individual 

capacity, and Kristin Alrick, in her 

individual capacity

v.

Eric and Ruth Giauque, Individually 

and as Next Friend of H.G., N.G., 

M.G., C.G., and B.G., minor children

§

§

§

§

§

From the 342nd District Court

of Tarrant County (342-247746-10)

October 31, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial 

court is reversed and we render a judgment dismissing appellees’ Eric and Ruth 

Giauque, Individually and as Next Friend of H.G., N.G., M.G., C.G., and B.G.,

claims against appellants Brenda Lund, in her individual capacity, and Kristin 

Alrick, in her individual capacity, under section 101.106(f).
It is further ordered that appellees Eric and Ruth Giauque, Individually and 

as Next Friend of H.G., N.G., M.G., C.G., and B.G., shall pay all costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                         CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT


I, Robert W. Duggan, Chief Executive Officer of Computer Motion, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d));
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 12, 2003                          COMPUTER MOTION, INC.


                                            By: /s/ Robert W. Duggan
                                            Robert W. Duggan
                                            Chairman of the Board of Directors
                                            and Chief Executive Officer
259 La. 80

#### Joe T. HUFFMAN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 51547.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1971.

In re: John F. Jones and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 247 So.2d 591.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
FHWA-SA-21-043

Yellow Change 

Intervals

At a signalized intersection, the yellow change interval is the length of 

time that the yellow signal indication is displayed following a green signal 

indication. The yellow signal confirms to motorists that the green has ended 

and that a red will soon follow.

Since red-light running is a leading 

cause of severe crashes at signalized 

intersections, it is imperative that 

the yellow change interval be 

appropriately timed. Too brief an 

interval may result in drivers being 

unable to stop safely and cause 

unintentional red-light running. 

Too long of an interval may result 

in drivers treating the yellow as 

an extension of the green phase 

and invite intentional red-light 

running. Factors such as the speed 

of approaching and turning 

vehicles, driver perception-reaction 

time, vehicle deceleration, and 

intersection geometry should all be 

considered in the timing calculation.

Transportation agencies can improve 

signalized intersection safety and 

reduce red-light running by reviewing 

and updating their traffic signal 

timing policies and procedures 

concerning the yellow change 

interval. Agencies should institute 

regular evaluation and adjustment 

protocols for existing traffic signal 

timing. Refer to the Manual on 

Uniform Traffic Control Devices for 

basic requirements and further 

recommendations about yellow 

change interval timing.1

 As part of 

strategic signal system modernization 

and updates, incorporating 

automated traffic signal 

performance measures (ATSPMs) is 

a proven approach to improve on 

traditional retiming processes. ATSPMs 

provide continuous performance 

monitoring capability and the ability 

to modify timing based on actual 

performance, without requiring 

expensive modeling or data 

collection.2

8-14%

reduction in 

total crashes.3

12%

reduction in 

injury crashes.3

Appropriately timed yellow change intervals 

can reduce red-light running and improve 

overall intersection safety. Source: FHWA 

Safety Benefits:

36-50%

reduction in 

red light running.3

For more information on this 

and other FHWA Proven Safety 

Countermeasures, please visit 

https://highways.dot.gov/

safety/proven-safety-counter

measures and https://high 

ways.dot.gov/sites/fhwa.dot.

gov/files/2022-06/ 

fhwasa13027.pdf.

1 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Section 4F.17. FHWA, (2023).

2 Federal Highway Administration. “Automated Traffic Signal Performance,” (2020). 

3 (CMF ID: 380,384) NCHRP Report 731: Guidelines for Timing Yellow and All-Red Intervals 

at Signalized Intersections, (2011).

OFFICE OF SAFETY

Proven Safety 

Countermeasures