alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28168]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company that engages either 
directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking 
activity that is listed in Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) 
or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to 
banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise 
noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than November 17, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Jeffery Hirsch, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Central Bancshares, Inc., Lexington, Kentucky; to acquire 
Central Bank, F.S.B., Nicholasville, Kentucky (in formation), and 
thereby engage through a de novo federal-chartered savings bank, in 
permissible savings and loan association activities, pursuant to Sec.  
225.28 (b)(4) of the Board's Regulation Y.
    2. Star Bank Corporation, Cincinnati, Ohio; to acquire Great 
Financial Corporation, Louisville, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Great Financial Bank, F.S.B, Louisville, Kentucky, and thereby 
engage in permissible savings and loan association activities, pursuant 
to Sec.  225.28 (b)(4) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 20, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-28168 Filed 10-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



            PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 1350
                           (furnished but not filed)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ViaVid Broadcasting, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian
Kathler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                       /s/ Brian Kathler
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Brian Kathler
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       February 10, 2005
EXHIBIT 10.13


Translation from Agreement
Written in Arabic.



                            EGYPTIAN ARAB LAND BANK
                                  Irbid Branch


                                                          Reference Number: 1038

Prosperity Textiles, Ltd.

Subject: Import Line of Credit


Greetings:

With reference to the above subject, and on the basis of the meeting held on
July 19, 2001 by and between the Egyptian Arab Land Bank administrative board
and the Prosperity Textiles Ltd. board of directors with respect to the
possibility of granting the Company a line of Credit on the strength of its
import letters of credit.

We are pleased to inform you that the Administrative Board has agreed to grant
you an import line of credit in the amount of two (2) million Jordan dinars as
follows:

      o  50% pre-shipment financing of import letters of credit received by us;

      o  80% post-shipment financing of the total value of shipping documents
         presented to us;

      o  Debiting of 11% interest on transactions financed from the Bank's own
         financial resources, plus 1% commission; and

      o  Debiting 6% on transactions financed pursuant to the Export Incentive
         Credit Act (Central Bank). The said line of credit shall be secured
         by:

         o   Endorsement in favor of the bank of all import letters of credit;
             and

         o   Approval by the Prosperity Board of Directors.



Respectively,


Egyptian Arab Land Bank
[signature]
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. John Earl SMITH, Appellee.

No. 70-254.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 1, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Joseph TRIPI, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 39721.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 17, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 234 So.2d IS.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and BOYD, JJ., concur.
# L_2005199EN.01009501.xml

| 29.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 199/95 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 199/95

---

COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2005/584/CFSP

of 28 July 2005

extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for Moldova

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 14, 18(5) and 23(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 23 March 2005 the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/265/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Adriaan JACOBOVITS de SZEGED as European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for Moldova. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 23 March 2005 the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/265/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Adriaan JACOBOVITS de SZEGED as European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for Moldova.

| (2) | On the basis of a review of Joint Action 2005/265/CFSP the mandate of the EUSR should be extended for a further 6 months. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review of Joint Action 2005/265/CFSP the mandate of the EUSR should be extended for a further 6 months.

| (3) | The EUSR will implement his mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy as set out in Article 11 of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The EUSR will implement his mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy as set out in Article 11 of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

The mandate of Mr Adriaan JACOBOVITS de SZEGED as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for Moldova, as set out in Joint Action 2005/265/CFSP, is hereby extended until 28 February 2006.

Article 2

Article 5(1) of Joint Action 2005/265/CFSP shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR shall be EUR 300 000.’

Article 3

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Article 4

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 July 2005.

For the Council

The President

J. STRAW

---

(1)  
  OJ L 81, 30.3.2005, p. 50.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2 – CFO
Certification








ROYAL INVEST INTERNATIONAL
CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADDED BY


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Invest
International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nathan Lapkin, Director and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.





By: /s/ Nathan
Lapkin


Nathan
Lapkin


Director
and Chief Financial Officer





November
19, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

    KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, and each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Charles B. Blackmon his Attorney-in-Fact, with
full power of substitution, for him in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any amendment to this report on Form 10-KSB, and to file
the same, with exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and hereby ratifies and confirms all
that said Attorney-In-Fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

    In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.

Signature                        Title                        Date

/s/ Charles B. Blackmon          Chief Executive Officer,     March 31, 1998
--------------------------       President, Director and
Charles B. Blackmon              Chief Financial Officer

/s/ W. Roy Bennett
--------------------------       Director                     March 31, 1998
W. Roy Bennett

/s/ Raymond E. Dender
--------------------------       Director                     March 31, 1998
Raymond E. Dender

/s/ Crisp B. Flynt
--------------------------       Director                     March 31, 1998
Crisp B. Flynt

/s/ Harvey Goldstein
--------------------------       Director                     March 31, 1998
Harvey Goldstein

/s/ Arch W. McGarity
--------------------------       Director                     March 31, 1998
Arch W. McGarity

/s/ Philip J. Mouchet
--------------------------       Director                     March 31, 1998
Philip J. Mouchet

                  [REMAINING SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
<PAGE>

Signature                        Title                        Date

/s/ G. Niles Murray, III         Director                     March 31, 1998
----------------------------
G. Niles Murray, III


/s/ Robert H. Smalley            Director                     March 31, 1998
----------------------------
Robert H. Smalley


/s/ James E. Sutherland, Sr.     Director                     March 31, 1998
----------------------------
James E. Sutherland, Sr.


/s/ Frank Touchstone, Jr.        Director                     March 31, 1998
----------------------------
Frank Touchstone, Jr.


/s/ Eugene M. Weatherup, Sr.     Director                     March 31, 1998
----------------------------
Eugene M. Weatherup, Sr.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3640 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 327
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3640

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
      at 155 South Main Street in Mount Clemens, Michigan, as the 
        ``Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 23, 2024

  Mr. Peters (for himself and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                            February 6, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
      at 155 South Main Street in Mount Clemens, Michigan, as the 
        ``Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT COLONEL ALEXANDER JEFFERSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 155 South Main Street in Mount Clemens, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lieutenant 
Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 327

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3640

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
      at 155 South Main Street in Mount Clemens, Michigan, as the 
        ``Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 6, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    Letter of Arthur Andersen Representation

To the Securities and Exchange Commission:

         We received a letter from Arthur Andersen LLP, dated March 29, 2002,
representing that the audit was subject to their quality control system for the
U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there
was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit and
availability of national office consultation, and availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Very truly yours,



/s/ Larry Redfern
-----------------
Larry Redfern
Acting Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Goleta, California
March 29, 2002
#### Sidney WALKER, Appellant, v. William Wade HAMPTON, as Municipal Judge, and Joe C. Jenkins, Jr., as Municipal Judge Pro Tem., Judges of the Municipal Court in and for the City of Gainesville, Florida; the City of Gainesville, a municipal corporation, Appellees.

No. M-381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 19, 1970.

Richard J. Wilson and Margaret Kathleen Wright, Gainesville, for appellant.

Allison E. Folds, of Fagan, Crouch, Anderson & Folds, Gainesville, for appellees.

SPECTOR, Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment denying a petition for a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent Municipal Judge of the City of Gainesville, Florida, from conducting appellant’s trial on a charge of violating a municipal ordinance proscribing driving while intoxicated unless a jury trial is afforded in accordance with Section 322.262(4), F.S.A., 1967.

The Circuit Judge to whom the petition was addressed held the statute inapplicable to proceedings in municipal courts. We agree. See City of Gainesville v. Hilliard, 207 So.2d 520 (Fla.App.1968), cert. discharged Hilliard v. City of Gainesville, 213 So.2d 689 (Fla.1968), appeal dismissed 393 U.S. 321, 89 S.Ct. 556, 21 L.Ed.2d 517 (1969), rehearing denied 393 U.S. 1112, 89 S.Ct. 858, 21 L.Ed.2d 814, and Smith v. Davis, 231 So.2d 517 (Fla.1970).

The sole thrust of appellant’s contention rests on the opinion of the court *326in Davis v. Smith, 227 So.2d 342 (Fla.App.1969). That decision was reversed in Smith v. Davis, supra, which was decided subsequent to the filing of the briefs herein. Noting the need to rest his case on other grounds, appellant’s able counsel has filed a motion for leave to submit a supplemental brief by which he contends that the case at bar should be reversed because of certain other constitutional principles enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Duncan v. State of Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 88 S.Ct. 1444, 20 L.Ed.2d 491, and Waller v. State of Florida, 397 U.S. 387, 90 S.Ct. 1184, 25 L.Ed.2d 435, decided April 6, 1970. A reading of the final judgment appealed does not indicate, that the trial court considered such additional constitutional questions nor does it appear that such questions were directly considered by the trial judge in the rendition of his judgment. The rule is well settled that an appellate court will not consider matters urged for reversal unless the lower court had been afforded a full and adequate opportunity to consider such contentions. Accordingly, the motion to file supplemental brief is denied.

The final judgment appealed is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and RAWLS, J., concur.
#### George PLOMARITIS and Freda Plomaritis, his wife, et al., Appellants, v. Estelle B. FERGUSON, a widow, Appellee.

No. 69-728.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 7, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 16, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### ROSENDALE et al. v. PHILLIPS et al.

No. 281.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 22, 1937.

Frederick E. Goldsmith and Louis E. Felix, both of New York City, for appellants.

William L. Standard, of New York City, for appellees.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from must be reversed and the bill dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The bill of complaint is wholly devoid of jurisdictional allegations. It is brought by the Marine Firemen’s Oilers’ and Watertenders’ Union of the "Atlantic and Gulf, an unincorporated membership association, and certain of its officers and members, as plaintiffs, against other members of the union, as defendants. There is no allegation that all the plaintiffs are of different citizenship than all the defendants, nor is there any allegation as to the amount involved. On the argument before this court it was conceded that some of the members of the plaintiff union were citizens of the same state as some of the defendants. This excludes the possibility of basing jurisdiction on diverse citizenship, and there can be no other ground. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 61.F.(2d) 115 (C.C.A.2), cited with apparent approval in Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co., 288 U.S. 476, 480, 53 S.Ct. 447, 448, 77 L.Ed. 903; Ex parte Edelstein, 30 F.(2d) 636 (C.C.A. 2), certiorari denied Edelstein v. Goddard, 279 U.S. 851, 49 S.Ct. 347, 73 L.Ed. 994. Hepce no amendment of the complaint could cure its defective allegations. The decree must be reversed and the complaint dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It is so ordered.
<PAGE>   1
June 26, 2001(1)


[**]
[**]
[**]
[**]
[**]

         Re:      CONTRACT RENEWAL AND AMENDMENT(S)

Dear [**]:

         Statia Terminals N.V. ("Statia") is pleased to confirm to [**], the
following amendments to (i) the Storage and Throughput Agreement and (ii) Marine
Fuel Agreement between Statia and [**], both dated May 6, 1993, and previously
amended or extended through June 30, 2001.

A.       STORAGE AND THROUGHPUT AGREEMENT:

1.       Amend Section 4.1 - TERM - to provide as follows:

               The Term of this Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2001, and,
               subject to the provisions of Article VI of this Agreement, shall
               end at midnight on June 30, 2002.

B.       MARINE FUEL AGREEMENT:

1.       Amend the first paragraph of Section 1 - Term of Agreement - to provide
         as follows:

               Subject to the provisions of Section 10 hereof, this Agreement
               shall commence on July 1, 2001, and shall end at midnight on June
               30, 2002, (the "Term").

2.       Amend Section 6(c) - regarding [**] Price - to provide as follows:

              In the event Statia sells a Commodity at a price (the "Sale
              Price") other than the [**]:

              a) [**]:

                            [**]

                            [**]

              b) [**]:

--------
(1) Asterisks indicate redacted language for which confidential treatment has
been requested pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. This information has been separately filed with the Commission
pursuant to a confidential treatment request dated August 14, 2001.



<PAGE>   2

                            [**]

                            [**]

              Each Sale Price shall be fixed on the date of Statia's sale of the
              Commodities to the Statia Customers and shall not be subject to
              change thereafter.

         Except as amended by the foregoing, all terms, conditions, and
obligations of (i) the Storage and Throughput Agreement and (ii) Marine Fuel
Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

         The above represents Statia's understanding of the agreements reached
on June 22, 2001. Assuming you concur, please acknowledge your agreement and
acceptance of the foregoing amendments by signing this letter in the space
provided below and returning a fully-executed copy to the undersigned.

         Statia is very pleased to have concluded these amendments to the
Agreements and looks forward to continuing to improve the mutual benefits of our
relationship.

                                       Sincerely yours,



                                       Clarence W. Brown
                                       Director

Agreed to and accepted this
29th day of June, 2001


[**]


By:      ____________________

Name:    ____________________

Title:   ____________________


cc:      [**]
         [**]
         Mr. Dilio A. Baptista
         Mr. Robert R. Russo
         Mr. John D. Franklin
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0129**
#### Harry F. BECKHAM, Jr., Inc., Petitioner, v. John B. KRUSZESKI, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company et al., Respondents.

No. 39779.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 13, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur.