alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Robert A. KANTER, Respondent.

No. 39794.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 7, 1970.

Patrick A. Podsaid, Coral Gables, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

Robert A. Kanter, South Miami, in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us for review on the report of the Referee submitted May 6, 1970, recommending that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law in Florida. No request for hearing before us has been submitted by respondent.

Respondent was charged in three counts with misappropriation and conversion of clients’ funds to his own use. There was no attempt to deny the allegations of the complaint and, as of the date of the Referee’s order, no attempt at restitution.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the respondent, Robert A. Kanter, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Florida.

Execution is hereby directed to issue for the costs against respondent in the amount of $213.50.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and BOYD, JJ., concur.
# L_2005141EN.01003101.xml

| 4.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 141/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 141/31

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 770/2005 of 20 May 2005 on import licences in respect of beef and veal products originating in Botswana, Kenya, Madagascar, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and Namibia

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 128 of 21 May 2005
  )

On Page 17, in the first sentence of Article 2:

for:

‘during the first 10 days of May 2005’,

read:

‘during the first 10 days of June 2005’.

---
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

NJ 04 Improved Access to Scott's 

Landing Roadway Reconstruction

U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service - Edwin B. 

Forsythe National Wildlife 

Refuge

Galloway 

Township Atlantic 2017

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the New Jersey Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the New Jersey FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

New Jersey Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2018

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The New Jersey PDC does not have a firm date for the 

next Call for Projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. 

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
# L_2005344EN.01005201.xml

| 27.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 344/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/52

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on harmonised river information services (RIS) on inland waterways in the Community

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 255 of 30 September 2005
  )

On page 155, Article 5(2), under points (a) and (c):

for:

for:

| ‘2. | (...) The establishment shall be carried out in accordance with the following time-table:






  (a) | the RIS guidelines by 20 June 2006, |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘2.

(...) The establishment shall be carried out in accordance with the following time-table:

(a)

the RIS guidelines by 20 June 2006,

| (b) | (...) |
| --- | --- |

(b)

(...)

| (c) | the technical specifications regarding the vessel tracking and tracing systems by 20 December 2006.’ |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the technical specifications regarding the vessel tracking and tracing systems by 20 December 2006.’

read:

read:

| ‘2. | (...) The establishment shall be carried out in accordance with the following time-table:






  (a) | the RIS guidelines by 20 July 2006, |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘2.

(...) The establishment shall be carried out in accordance with the following time-table:

(a)

the RIS guidelines by 20 July 2006,

| (b) | (...) |
| --- | --- |

(b)

(...)

| (c) | the technical specifications regarding the vessel tracking and tracing systems by 20 January 2007.’ |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the technical specifications regarding the vessel tracking and tracing systems by 20 January 2007.’

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. ER97-4799-000]


Maine Public Service Company; Notice of Filing

October 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 30, 1997, Maine Public Service 
Company filed an executed Service Agreement with PacifiCorp Marketing, 
Inc.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before November 3, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28458 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
OneNote 

File System Usage 
How OneNote is Set Up
The FRE will send you an email saying that you have 

access to OneNote. Make sure you are on the VPN. 

The file will remain on the I Drive but a local file will 

download to your computer. 

Access to OneNote.
When you click on the link, it will open up OneNote 

and the project will download. 
When you hover over the project name on the left 

hand side, it will show you that the file is on the I 

Drive. 
D

Project are created by Final Review Engineer and 

are located on the Network Drive: I Drive. 
A

B

C

D A = Notebooks (Equivalent to a binder to a set of 

project books)

B = Section (Equivalent to a binder)

C = Page (Equivalent to a tab in a binder)

D = Content (Equivalent to whatever is in each tab)
A typical project... 

Bold areas are showing something new that was 

added but I have not seen yet. 
A Shows under “Estimates and CMs” > “CM 

0001” that there is a new document 

“Administrative Change: Accounting Info 

Changes.”

Initials of person 

making change
Adding Documents to OneNote
You can drag and drop files to 

the correct tab.
There will be file options for adding documents
What it look like when “Insert a copy of the file 

onto the page”. This is the option that should 

always be selected.
What it look like when “Insert File as a Printout”

This option is not preferred. Check with your COE 

if they would like you to add your PE diarys in this 

format
Syncing
Because the file is located on 

the I drive, it needs to be 

synced. If it is synced up, it will 

have the green circle with a 

green check mark. 
If you want to sync your 

project, press the circle next to 

the file. A pop up window will 

pop up. You will then press 

“Sync Now.”

If you can’t get it to sync, try 

restarting your computer and 

then call the Final Review 

Engineer if that doesn’t work.
Setting up a Link
EXAMPLE: The Delegation of 

Authority has the EEBACS 

Delegation of Authority within 

the document. However, this is 

under the Correspondence tab.
The EEBACS Delegation of 

Authority should be under the 

EEBACS Delegation of Authority 

tab. But since it’s not, you can 

create a link.
You will right click on your 

EEBACS Delegation of Authority 

page and options will pop up. 

Click on “Link... (Ctrl+K).”
A window will pop up for you 

to select the file that you want 

it to link to. 
Choose your file. We want to 

link the EEBACS Delegation of 

Authority back to the folder 

Correspondence where the 

document is located. And then 

Press “OK.”
It has created a link. So when 

you click on “With Vancouver” 

it will take you to the 

Correspondence page to see 

the document with EEBACS 

Delegation of Authority in it.
After clicking on “With 

Vancouver” you were taken to 

the Correspondence page to 

see the document with EEBACS 

Delegation of Authority in it.

This is super handy so you 

aren’t having to email files to 

the Final Review Engineer. All 

you have to email to say it’s 

been uploaded.
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION 

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

Two copies of all documents for mix approval should be sent to the appropriate office: 

A. Federal Highway Administration

Eastern Federal Lands Highway 

Division Construction, Suite 200

22001 Loudoun County Parkway 

Building E2, Suite 200 

Ashburn, VA 20147

Attn: Construction Operations Engineer 

B. For US Mail: For FedEx: 

Federal Highway Administration Federal Highway Administration 

P.O. Box 4457 Jack Delozier Drive 

Sevierville, TN 37864-4457 John Marshal Technology Park 

Sevierville, TN 37876 

Attn: Construction Operations Engineer 

Material Samples (and copies of documentation) for job mix verifications should be 

sent to the following laboratory site: 

FedEx/UPS or Other Direct Building Delivers:

Federal Highway Administration 

EFLHD Materials Laboratory 

Jack Delozier Drive 

John Marshal Technology Park 

Sevierville, TN 37862
```

                 [LETTERHEAD OF FRIEDMAN ALPREN & GREEN LLP]

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 333-96667,  333-104541,  333-110543 and 333-112529) on Form S-3 and in the
Registration Statements (Nos. 333-37293 and 333-90611) on Form S-8 of our report
dated February 16, 2004 on the financial statements of Catskill Development, LLC
and its  subsidiaries  for the year ended December 31, 2003, and to the addition
of our firm under the caption "Experts" in the Prospectus, insofar as it relates
to our report on the financial statements of Catskill  Development,  LLC and its
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                            /s/ Friedman Alpren & Green LLP
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Friedman Alpren & Green LLP

New York, New York
March 26, 2004
```
#### Shirley Jean PENCE v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE et al.

No. 11624.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Feb. 23, 1978.

Lemeul E. Hawsey, III, Baton Rouge, of counsel for plaintiff-appellant Shirley Jean Pence.

Joseph F. Keogh, Parish Atty., Baton Rouge, of counsel for defendant-appellee City of Baton Rouge, et al.

Charles E. Pilcher, Asst. Parish Atty., Baton Rouge, of counsel for defendant-ap-pellee City of Baton Rouge et al.

Before LOTTINGER, EDWARDS and PONDER, JJ.

LOTTINGER, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation suit wherein the plaintiff, Shirley Jean Pence, concubine of the deceased employee, sues for death benefits. The defendants filed an exception of no cause and no right of action. The exception of no right of action was sustained and suit was dismissed with prejudice.

In reversing this Court in *Henderson*v. *Travelers Ins. Co.,*346 So.2d 816 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1977) *reversed*349 So.2d 886 (La.1978), our Supreme Court acknowledged the plaintiff-appellant concubine’s right of action.

Therefore, for the above and foregoing reasons, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded for further proceed*675ings in accordance with the views expressed by the Supreme Court in *Henderson v. Travelers Ins. Co.,*at appellee’s costs to the extent allowed by law.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
EXHIBIT
32



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Progreen Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
January 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jan Telander,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|April
    25, 2016 | /s/
    Jan Telander                                
|------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------
|                   | Jan
    Telander, President, Chief Executive Officer
|                   | and
    Principal Financial Officer                 



The
foregoing certification is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespectively
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1

ARCA BIOPHARMA, INC.

(FORMERLY KNOWN AS NUVELO, INC.)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SEC. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Richard B. Brewer, Chief Executive Officer of ARCA
biopharma, Inc. (formerly known as Nuvelo, Inc.) (the Company), and Kathryn E. Falberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 27th day of March, 2009.



|                                                        |  |  |  |                                           
|------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD B.
BREWER                                |  |  |  | /s/    KATHRYN E.
FALBERG                 
|Richard B. Brewer President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Kathryn E. Falberg Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of ARCA biopharma, Inc. (formerly known as Nuvelo, Inc.) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

Date:
March 27, 2009
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J O H N WI T H E R O W, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. C R AI G F AR WE L L a n d NE VA DA ATTORNEY GENERAL, R esp o n d en t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 16594 D. C . No . 3 : 0 4 - C V- 0 0 6 5 8 - HD M ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da H ow a r d D . M c K i bbe n, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , T H O M A S , a n dW . F L E T C H E R , C ir c u it J u d g e s . N ev ad a s tate p riso n erJo h n W ith er o w ap p ea ls p ro se fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED JU N 14 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSW e c e rt i f yf orappe a l , on ourow n m ot i on, the i s s ue of w he the rthe N e va da 1 D e pa rtm e ntof

C orr e c t i ons ’ f

a i l ur e t o de duc te a rne d good t i m e c r e di t s f r om W i th ero w ’ s l i fet i m e t erm o f i m p ri so n m en tv i o l at ed d u e p ro cess. 08- 16594 2 u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 , a n d w e a f f irm . 1 W i the r ow c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d byde t e rm i ni ng tha the ha s no f e d e r a llyr e c o g n iz e d lib e rtyin te r e s t in th e ap p lic a tio n o f g o o dtim e c r e d its to h is l i f e s e nt e nc e . W i the r ow ’ s due pr oc e s s r i ght s w e r e notvi ol a t e d be c aus e the s t a t e of N e va daha s notc r e a t e d al i be rtyi nt e r e s ti n the appl i c a t i on of good t i m e c r e di t s t o a lif e s e n te n c e . See H

un t v. W arden , 9 0 3 P .2 d8 2 6 , 8 2 7 ( N e v . 1 9 9 5 ) ; see a l so W o lff v . McD o n n e ll , 41 8 U . S . 53 9, 55 7 (19 74 ). T hu s, the N evada S up re m e C ou rt ’ s order r e je c tin g th is c la im w a s n e ith e rc o n tr a ryto , n o rin v o lv e da n u n r e a s o n ab le appl i ca t i on of, cl earl y e st abl i shed fe dera l l aw as det erm i ned b y the S up re m e C ou rt o f th e U n ite d S ta te s . See 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 4(d)(1). AF F I RME D.
#### Samuel ST. CLAIR and Rachel St. Clair, his wife, Appellants, v. The DUNEDIN HOUSING AUTHORITY, INC., Appellee.

No. 73-604.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 27, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAY 10, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 10-14811

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-00012-MCR-AK-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AMANDA YVONNE WHITE,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(May 10, 2011)

Before WILSON, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Amanda White, in this direct

criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant, because counsel believes that the appeal is without merit. Counsel has

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues of merit, counsel’s motion to

withdraw is GRANTED, and White’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          49,055
<SECURITIES>                                    20,149
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                       486
<INVENTORY>                                     33,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,016
<PP&E>                                          27,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,809
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        98,655
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,985
<SALES>                                        226,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,455
<CGS>                                          106,818
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,439
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (3,241)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,439
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,813
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,626
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,626
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND
  RULE 13a-14(b)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sense Technologies
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2004
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of
  the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
  certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Rule 13a-14(b), that to his
  knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

|Dated: July 20, 2004 | /s/ Bruce E. Schreiner                    
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                     |                                           
|                     | Bruce E. Schreiner                        
|                     | President and Principal Accounting Officer

---