### 37402 Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 161 / Thursday, August 18, 1983 / Rules and Regulations

(c) * * * (22) The Washington, D.C. Implementation Plan for maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standard forLead submitted on Octobei 7, 1982 by the Mayor.

tFR Doc. 83-22608 Filed 8-17-83; 8:45 am)
BILLING CODE 560-,0-M

40 CFR Part 52
[A-9-FRL 247-51

Hawaii State Implementation Plan Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Notice offinal rulemaking.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) takes final action to approve changes to the Hawaii Department ofHealth Services (HDHS) rules and regulations for air pollution control submitted by the Director ofthe HDHS as revisions to the Hawaii State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions are administrative and retain the previous emission control requirements. EPA reviewed these rules with respect to the Clean Air Act and determined that they should be approved.

DATE: This action is effective October 17, 1983. ADDRESSES: A copy ofthe revisions is available for public inspection during normal business hours at the EPA Region 9 office and at the following locations: Public Information Reference Unit,

Environmental Protection Agency, Library, 401 M Street SW., Room 2404, Washington, D.C. 20460 Library, Office ofthe Federal Register,

1100 LStreet, NW., Room 8401, Washington, D.C. 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Douglas Grano, Chief,State Implementation Plan Section, Air Programs Branch, AirManagement Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 215 Fremont Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 974-7641.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 20, 1982, the HDHS submitted Title 11, Chapter 60, "Air Pollution Control" to EPA as a SIPrevision. This revision represents a recodification of the previously approved "Public Health Regulations," Chapter 43, "Air Pollution Control." The revised rules are as follows:

Sec. 11-60-01 Definitions. Sec. 11-60-02 Permit system, applicability. 11-60-03 Permit system, applications. 11-60-04 Permit system, conditions for considering applications. 11-60-05 Pormit system, action on application. 11-60-06 Permit system, performance testing. 11-60-07 Permit system, cancellation of authority to construct. 11-60-08 Permit system, suspension or revocation ofpermit to operate. 11-60-09 Peemit system, transfer ofpermit
to operate. 11-60-10 Permit system, reporting discontinuance ordismantlement. 11-60-11 Permit system, posting ofpermit to operate. 11-60-12 Permit system, fees. 11-60-13 Permit system, fee schedule for a permit to operate. 11-60-14 Permit system, period ofpermit. 11-60-15 Sampling, testing, and reporting methods. 11-60-16 Malfunction of equipment reporting. 11-60-17 Prohibition ofair pollution. 11-60-18 Control ofopenburning. 11-60-19 Agricultural burning,permit requirement. 11-60-20 Agricultural burning, applications. 11-60-21 Agricultural burning, "no-burn" days. 11-60-22 Agricultural burning,record keeping andmonitoring. 11-60-23 Agricultural burning, action on application. 11-60-24 Visible emissions. 11-60-25 Control ofmotor vehicles. 11-60-26 Fugitive dust. 11-60-27 Incineration. 11-60-28 Bagasse-burning boilers. 11-60-29 Process industries. 11-60-35 Prevention ofair pollution emergency episodes. 11-60-36 Variances. 11-60-37 Penalties and remedies. 11-60-38 Severability.

These rule revisions are administrative and do not significantly impact current emission control requirements. The above mentioned rules only reflect a renumbering change, with the exception ofthe revisions discussed below.

In rule 11-60-01 (Definitions) a number ofdefinitions havebeen revised to provide clarification and improve the enforceability ofthe SIP. Rule 11-60-18 (Contol ofopen burning) continues to exempt fires for training personnel from the open burning requirements; but these fires are no longer subject to the visible emission limitations. Revisions in rule 11-60-24 (Visible emissions) allow

an increase for visible emissions of60 percent opacity from three to six minutes in any sixtyminutes of specific stations, delete reference to the Ringelmann Chart, and provide procedures for evaluating opacity readings. Rule 11-60-25 (Control of motor vehicles) is revised to allow an engine to be in operation forup to three minutes while loading or unloading passengers and for the buildup of pressure in the start-up ofengines. Section 2(b) and Section 6 ofChapter 43

are deleted from Rule 11-60 since "Registration for Existing Source" and "Compliance Schedule" is no longer applicable since effective dates are specified forindividual sections.

Under Section 110 ofthe Clean Air Act as amended, and 40 CFR Part 51, EPA is required to approve or disapprove these regulations as SIP revisions.All rules submitted have been evaluated and found to be in accordance with EPA policy and 40 CFR Part51. EPA's detailed evaluation of the submitted rules is available at the EPA Library in Washington, D.C., and the Region 9office.

It is the purpose ofthis notice to approve all the rule revisions listed above and to incorporate them into the Hawaii SIP. This is being done without prior proposal because therevisions are noncontroversial, have limited impact, and no comments are anticipated. The public should be advised that this action will be effective 60 days from the date of thisFederal Register notice. However, if notice is received within 30 days that

someone wishes to submit adverse or critical comments, the approval will be withdrawn and a subsequent notice will be published before the effective date. The'subsequent notice will indefinitely postpone the effective date, modify the final action to a proposed action, and establish a comment period.

In addition, this notice corrects clerical errors in 40 CFR 52.620 Identificationof plan,paragraph (c)(14). These corrections impose no new requirements.

Under 5 U.S.C. Section 605(b), I certify that SIPapprovals do nothave a significant economic impact on a substantial number ofsmall entities. (See 46 FR 8709.) The Office of Management and Budget has exempted thisrule from the requirements of Section 3ofExecutive Order 12291.

Under the Clean AirAct, any petitions forjudicial review ofthis action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 17, 1983.This action may notbe challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements.

Note.-Incorporation byreference ofthe State Implementation Planfor the State of Hawaii was approved by the Director of the Federal Register on July 1,19B2.

### Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 161 / Thursday, August 18, 1983 / Rules and Regulations

Authority: Sections 110 and 301(a) ofthe Clean Air Act, as amended (42U.S.C. 7410, 7502 and7801(a)).
List of Subjects in 40CFR Part 52

Airpollution control, Ozone, Sulfur oxides, Nitrogen dioxide, Lead, Particulate matter, Carbon monoxide. Hydrocarbons, Intergovernmental relations.

Dated: August 10, 1983. William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator.

PART 52-[AMENDED]

SubpartM ofChapter I,Title 40,Code ofFederal Regulations is amended as follows: Subpart M-Hawali

1. Section 52.620 paragraph (c) is revised byredesignating paragraph (14), Hawaii State Lead SIPto paragraph (15) andby addingparagraph (16) to read as follows: 

### §52.620 Identificationofplan.



## (c)* * * (14) Avariance oftheHawaii Public Health Regulations, Chapter 43, Section 8(b)(1) submitted on April 6, 1982, bythe Governor.

(15) Hawaii State Lead SIP Revision submitted on October 29, 1982, by the State.

(16] The following amendments to the plan were submitted on December 20, 1982 by the State.

(i) Title 11-Department ofHealth, Chapter 60,Air Pollution Control.

(A) Amended Sections 11-60-01 thru 11-60-29, 11-60-35 thru 11-60-38.

[FRDoc. 83-22613 Filed 8-17-83; 8:45 am] BILUNO CODE 6560-50-U

40 CFR Part 52
[EPA Docket No. AW048VA; A-3-FRL2417- 4] 1.

Commonwealth ofVirginia;Revision of the Virginia State Implementation Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Final Rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This

### notice approves an alternative compliance schedule for the James River Paper Company's Filter Manufacturing Plant in Richmond, Virginia. Volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from this plant will be eliminated through conversion to a water-based system. However, the company needs additional time to come into compliance with the regulations because ofthe difficulties involved in the conversion.
DATE: This action willbe effective on October 17, 1983. Unless adverse or critical comments are received by EPA

on orbefore September 19, 1983. ADDRESSES: Copies ofthe SIPrevision and the accompanying support documents are available forinspection during normal businesshours at the following locations:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, Air Management Branch, 6th &Walnut Streets, Curtis Building, Philadephia, PA 19106, Attn: Gregory Ham (3AW13) Virginia State AirPollution Control

Board, Commonwealth ofVirginia, Room 801, Ninth Street Office Building, Richmond,VA 23219, Attn: John M.Daniel, Jr. Office ofthe Federal Register, 1100 L

StreetNW., Room 8401, Washingtion, D.C. Public Information Reference Unit, EPA,

Room 2404, 401M Street, SW., Washingtidn,D.C.
Written comments on this revision should be sent to: Mr. Bernard Turlinski, Acting Chief,MD/VA/DC/DE Section (3AW13) at the EPA, Region IIIaddress above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Mr. Gregory Ham at theEPA address above, or at (215) 597-2745.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The changes to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP)were submitted on January 25, 1983 by the State AirPollution Control Board (SAPCB). Ahearing on this proposed SIP revision was held onMarch 15, 1983.

The James RiverPaper Company's plant in Richmond, Virginia manufactures paper specialty materials for oil and airfilters. In the process, a solvent-borne resin is applied to the filter paper.This solvent then evaporates, resulting in the emissions to the atmosphere ofvolatile organic compounds (VOC). Through conversion to water-borne resins, the company plans to totally eliminate VOC emissions.

The alternative compliance schedule for the James River Paper Company is being implemented through a Consent Agreement and Order between the company and the SAPCB. This order establishes an emission rate ofzero (0)
tons per year after January 1, 1987. In addition, interimreductions are required

as follows: (Tons/yeaf) (Tons VOC/ tons paper produced) Year Emissions emission rate

1982

............................... 1916

............................... 0.410 1983

...................... . 1916

............................... 0.410 1984

.......... ........... 1590

........................ 0.340 1985

............................... 843

........................... 0.160 1988

.............................. 422

.................................. 0.090

Quarterly progress reports are required which willindicate the progress that the company is making in achieving these reductions.

The Alternative Compliance Schedule requires the following increments of
progress.

1. Research and development oflow solvent content coatings shall be completed byJanaury 1, 1982 (completed).

2. Evaluation oflow solvent content coating,product quality, and commercial acceptance shall begin by April 1, 1982 (completed).

3.Purchase orders shall be issued for low solvent content coatings and process modifications by June 1,1983 (completed).

4. Initiation ofprocess modifications shall begin by December 1, 1983.

5. Process modifications shall be completed and use oflow solvent
content coatings shall begin by June 30, 1986.

6. Final compliance shall be achieved by January 1, 1987.

EPA believes this SIPrevision will result in substantial environmental benefit. EPAhas reviewed the revision and has determined that itmeets the requirements ofSection 110(a)(2) ofthe Clean AirAct and of40 CFR Part 52. Accordingly, EPA is approving this revision. EPA is revising 40 CFR 52.2420

as indicated below to incorporate this revision into theVirginia SIP.The public is advised that this action will be effective 60 days fromthe publication date ofthisnotice. However, ifEPA receives adverse orcritical comments within 30 days, EPAwill withdraw this action and willpublish subsequent notices before the effective date. One notice will withdraw thefinal action and another willbegin a new rulemaking by announcing a proposal of the action and establishing a comment period.

The Office ofManagement and Budget has exempted this rule from the requirements ofSection 3 ofthe Executive Order 12291. Under Section 307(b)(1) ofthe Clean Air Act, petitions forjudicial review ofthis action must be filed in theUnited States Court of Appeals forthe appropriate circuit by October 17, 1983. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 

### 37403