alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

MA-10 Taunton River Trail at Sweets 

Knoll

Preliminary Engineering 

and Multi-modal Trail 

Enhancement

National Park Service - 

Wild and Scenic Taunton 

River

MA 

Department of 

Conservation 

and Recreation

Bristol 2018-

2019

MA-11/MA16

Wauwinet Road Multiuse Path Bicycle/Pedestrian 

Facility

Fish and Wildlife Service - 

Coskata-Coatue National 

Wildlife Refuge

Town of 

Nantucket Nantucket 2019-2022

MA-12 Moody Bridge Road 

Improvement

Rehabilitate Grade and 

Crown, and Resurfacing

Fish and Wildlife Service - 

Silvio O. Conte National 

Wildlife Refuge

Town of Hadley Hampshire 2018-

2019

MA-13 Connecticut River Trail Access 

Improvements

Bicycle/Pedestrian 

Facility, Construction 

Engineering

National Park Service - 

New England National 

Scenic River Trail, Fish and 

Wildlife Service - Silvio O. 

Conte National Wildlife 

Refuge

Towns of 

Hadley and S 

Hadley

Hampshire 2017-

2018

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Massachusetts Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Massachusetts FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Massachusetts Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2018-2022

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The Massachusetts PDC does not have a firm date for 

the next Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please watch our website for updates.

https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/programs-access

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at
#### Stephen HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-394.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 10, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Enoch J. Whitney, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
MISSOURI - AGENCY CONTACTS

MO LPA

*PDC 

Meramec Regional

Planning

Commission

Bonnie Prigge Executive Director bprigge@meramecregion.org 573-265-2993

MO State

*PDC 

Missouri Department 

of Transportation

Andy Hanks Design Support Engineer Andrew.Hanks@modot.mo.gov 573-526-1862

MO FHWA

*PDC

FHWA EFL John Wilson Access Program Manager John.S.Wilson@dot.gov 703-404-6281

MO FHWA FHWA EFL Lewis Grimm Planning Team Leader Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov 703-404-6289

MO FHWA FHWA DO Felix Gonzalez Transportation Engineer Felix.R.Gonzalez@dot.gov 573-638-2623

MO FLMA NPS Mark Mitts Transportation Program Manager, 

NPS Regions 3,4,5

Mark_Mitts@nps.gov 231-373-0490

MO FLMA NPS Bruce Cardwell Federal Lands Transportation 

Program Engineer

Bruce_Cardwell@nps.gov 402-661-1716

MO FLMA FWS Brandon Jutz Regional Transportation 

Coordinator, Region 3

Brandon_Jutz@fws.gov 612-713-5407

MO FLMA FWS Nathan

Beauchamp

USFWS Transportation Program 

Analyst

nathan_beauchamp@fws.gov 703-358-2226

MO FLMA USFS Kevin Contardi National FHWA Liaison kevin.contardi@usda.gov 262-424-3395

MO FLMA USFS James Forseth R9 Transportation Engineer James.Forseth@usda.gov 414-297-1170

MO FLMA DOD

(non-USACE)

Douglas Briggs Engineer/HND-SDDCTEA douglas.e.briggs.civ@mail.mil 618-220-5229

MO FLMA DOD (USACE) Lynn Neher/

Patti Williams

Natural Resources

Program Manager

Lynn.N.Neher@usace.army.mil

patricia.d.williams@usace.army.

mil

314-331-8880

503-808-3897
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 24227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2014-0846; FRL-9927-09-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Texas; Revisions to the State Implementation Plan; Stage I Regulations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) related 
to Stage I Regulations that were submitted by the State of Texas on 
November 12, 2014. The EPA evaluated the Texas SIP submittal and 
determined these revisions are consistent with the requirements of the 
Clean Air Act (Act or CAA). The EPA is approving this action under the 
federal CAA.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before June 1, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Ms. Mary Stanton, Chief, Air 
Grants Section (6PD-S), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be 
submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following 
the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final 
rule located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracie Donaldson, (214) 665-6633, 
Donaldson.tracie@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct rule 
without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this 
action no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives relevant 
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do 
so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: April 22, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015-10121 Filed 4-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM N-PX ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF DWS California Tax-Free Income Fund and DWS New York Tax-Free Income Fund Each a Series of DWS State Tax-Free Income Series Investment Company Act file number  811-3657 DWS State Tax-Free Income Series (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)  345 Park Avenue New York, NY  10154 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code) John Millette Secretary One Beacon Street Boston, MA  02108-3106 (Name and address of agent for service) Registrant's telephone number, including area code:617-295-1000 Date of fiscal year end:08/31 Date of reporting period:7/1/07-6/30/08 Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles. A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.  ******************************* FORM N-Px REPORT *******************************

ICA File Number: 811-03657
Reporting Period: 07/01/2007 - 06/30/2008
DWS State Tax-Free Income Series









==================== A    DWS NEW YORK TAX-FREE INCOME FUND ====================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND



=================== B    DWS CALIFORNIA TAX-FREE INCOME FUND ===================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND

========== END NPX REPORT  
  SIGNATURES [See General Instruction F] Pursuant to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. (Registrant)
        DWS State Tax-Free Income Series
  By (Signature and Title)*/s/Michael G. Clark Michael G. Clark, Chief Executive Officer
 Date8/15/08 * Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Rouge Resources Ltd. on
Form 20-F/A-Amendment No. 1 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: July 9, 2014

ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.

/s/ Linda Smith
---------------------------------------Linda Smith, President and
Chief Executive Officer.

---
# EUR-Lex - 32005M3815 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005M3815

**Commission Decision of 16/06/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3815 - 3i GROUP / CAREMA) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

| |Brussels, 16.06.2005

SG-Greffe(2005) D/202670

To the notifying parties

Dear Sir,

Subject : Case No. COMP/M.3815-3i GROUP / CAREMA Notification of 17.05.2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C126, 25.05.2005, page 13.

1. On 17/05/05, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking 3i Group plc (“3i Group”, UK) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Carema Vård och Omsorg AB (“Carema”, Sweden) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are :

- for undertaking 3i Group : venture capital company,

- for undertaking Carema : provider of health care and care services.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph c, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004[2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Corrpro Companies, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-58376) on Form S-8 of Corrpro Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries (Company) of
our reports dated August 9, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Corrpro Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2002 and 2001, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2002, which
report appears in the March 31, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Corrpro
Companies, Inc.

Our report dated August 9, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
the Company was not in compliance with certain financial covenants contained in
its banking agreements. This matter raises substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.

Our report dated August 9, 2002 refers to the restatement of the consolidated
balance sheet as of March 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
August 9, 2002
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brad W. Rudover, President director of The Electric Network.com, Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Electric Network.com, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2004

/s/ Brad W. Rudover				Brad W. Rudover
President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Herman L. HALL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41358.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 27, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed. 249 So.2d 59.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3574 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3574

 To amend chapter 3 of title 36, United States Code, to designate the 
         mastodon as the national fossil of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 10, 2024

 Mr. Braun (for himself and Mr. Peters) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 3 of title 36, United States Code, to designate the 
         mastodon as the national fossil of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Fossil Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL FOSSIL OF THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) Designation.--Chapter 3 of title 36, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 306. National fossil
    ``The fossil of the genus Mammut, commonly known as the mastodon, 
is the national fossil.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--The table of sections for chapter 3 of 
title 36, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking the chapter heading and inserting 
        ``NATIONAL ANTHEM, MOTTO, FLORAL EMBLEM, MARCH, TREE, AND 
        FOSSIL''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

``306. National fossil.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Albert Francis DeVRIES, Appellant, v. Debra Jo DeVRIES, Appellee.

No. 77-1804.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 13, 1978.

Markus, Winter & Spitale and Laurie Silvers, Miami, for appellant.

Allen L. Jacobi, North Miami, for appel- . lee.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Nicholson v. Nicholson,*311 So.2d 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6686

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. QUATRAIL PAIR , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , Chief District Judge. ( 5:12

- cr
- 00400

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : November 9, 2017 Decided: November 22, 2017

Before WILKINSON , KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Quatrail Pair , Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Katherine Cooley , Jennifer P. May

- Parker , Rudy E. Renfer , Assistant United States Attorneys, Tobin Webb Lathan , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublish ed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Quatrail Pair appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion and his motion for transfer to federal custody . We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pair , No. 5:12

- cr
- 00400

- D

- 1 (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Edna ROBINSON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 47460.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 15, 1973.

Youngblood & Selph, Michael R. Medley, Jackson, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Karen Gilfoy, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Warren County; Ben Guider, Chancellor.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and SMITH, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ-

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28509]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation Policy; Proposed 
Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Subsequent Arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended (42 U.S.C. 2160), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
``subsequent arrangement'' under the Agreement for Cooperation in the 
Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the United States of America 
and the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) and the Agreement 
for Cooperation Between the Government of the United States of America 
and the Government of Canada Concerning the Civil Uses of Atomic 
Energy.
    The subsequent arrangement to be carried out under the above-
mentioned agreements involves approval of the following: RTD/EU(CA)-14 
for the transfer of 15,000 grams of enriched uranium fuel fabrication 
scrap, containing 2,962.5 grams of the isotope U\235\ (less than 20 
percent enrichment) from AECL in Chalk River, Canada, to UKAEA in 
Dounreay, United Kingdom, for the purpose of recovering uranium for 
return to Canada in the form of uranium metal pieces to be used in the 
fabrication of NRU reactor fuel.
    In accordance with section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will 
not be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen 
days after the date of publication of this notice.

    Dated: October 22, 1997.
    For the Department of Energy.
Cherie P. Fitzgerald,
Director, International Policy and Analysis Division, Office of Arms 
Control and Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 97-28509 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P