alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION
-------------

I, Bruce Capra, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nicklebys.com, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us by  others  within  those  entities,
     particularly  during  the period in which  this  quarterly  report is being
     prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
     and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
     effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
     controls; and

6.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 19, 2004


/s/ Bruce Capra
--------------------------------
Bruce Capra
Chief Financial Officer


                                       12
#### Billy Ray CLIFT v. STATE.

8 Div. 720.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Oct. 25, 1977.

After remand by the Supreme Court of Alabama.

AFFIRMED on authority of *Ex Parte State,*Ala., 352 So.2d 838. No opinion.

All the Judges concur.
254 La. 829

#### George L. DOSS v. AMERICAN VENTURES, INC., and Travelers Insurance Company.

No. 50066.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 6, 1969.

In re: George L. Doss applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 224 So.2d 470.

Writ refused. The judgment is not final.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Neuroscience; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting;

    Name: Advisory Panel for Neuroscience (1158).
    Date and Time: November 13-14, 1997; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 680, 4201 Wilson Boulevard., Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Christopher Platt, Program Director, Sensory 
Systems, Division of Integrative Biology and Neuroscience, Suite 
685, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 
22230 Telephone: (703) 306-1424.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Agenda: Open Session: November 14; 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., to 
discuss goals and assessment procedures. Closed Session: November 
13; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; November 14, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., 
and 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. To review and evaluate Sensory Systems 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-28115 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Rubin James MAULDIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. FF-413.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 9, 1977.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

There was no reversible error in the trial court’s refusal to charge the jury that insanity may result from extended and habitual intoxication. Appropriate charges were given on insanity and on intoxication as rendering a person incapable of a crime requiring specific intent. The jury convicted of murder in the first degree, obviously persuaded that appellant intended the death of the deceased. The charge that “voluntary drunkenness or intoxication does not excuse nor justify the commission of a crime” was appropriately qualified, was not confusing, and produced no harmful error.

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS, J., concur.
#### K. G. MULLIS v. STATE.

No. 38245.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 220 So.2d 387.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems 
(1205).
    Date & Time: November 6 and November 7, 1997; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 
p.m.
    Place: NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rooms 530 & 580, Arlington, 
Virginia.
    Contact Person: Drs. Jorn Larsen-Basse and Sunil Saigal, Program 
Directors, Surface Engineering & Tribology, Mechanics and Materials 
Programs, Division of Civil and Mechanical Systems, Room 545, NSF, 
4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230 703/306-1361, x5073 and 
x5069.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate research proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 10, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-27462 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-707 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CANADA 

Signed at Washington December 12, 2008 

 with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CANADA 

Emergency Management: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Washington 

 December 12, 2008; 

 Entered into force July 7, 2009. 

 With annex.
No. 72-6218.

#### Goodwin *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### AMERICAN FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Monica BOYD, Individually and Monica Boyd, as next friend of Christal Knaper, Appellees.

No. II-51.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 21, 1978.

*769Robert D. Bell of Fisher & Bell, Pensacola, for appellant.

James F. McKenzie of Myrick & McKenzie, Pensacola, for appellees.

BOYER, Judge.

The issue to be resolved on this interlocutory appeal, as phrased by appellant, is: “Whether the trial court erred in determining that the vehicle being operated by James Hansen was an uninsured motorist vehicle and in entering its order of partial summary judgment for the plaintiffs on the issue of coverage.”

Appellee, plaintiff in the trial court, filed a complaint alleging that she and Christal Knaper were members of the household of Henry W. Carlson, who was insured by appellant, American Fire and Casualty Company, and that Boyd and Knaper were, while traveling in the Carlson vehicle in 1972, injured in an automobile accident caused by the negligence of an uninsured motorist, James Hansen; seeking coverage under the uninsured motorist provision of Carlson’s policy. Hansen had, at the time of the accident, a liability insurance policy with GEICO, which policy contained an exclusionary clause excluding coverage while Hansen was traveling on orders of a branch of the military service. At the time of the accident Hansen was traveling under orders of a branch of the military.

Appellant contends that notwithstanding the exclusionary clause in the GEICO policy Hansen’s vehicle nevertheless did not qualify under the statute as an uninsured vehicle because his employer, the United States Government, was liable for his negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The sole issue is whether the Hansen vehicle was “an uninsured vehicle” within the meaning of that term as used in F.S. 627.727. We hold that it was, and therefore affirm. Although Hansen had procured a policy of insurance, that policy afforded no coverage because of the exclusionary clause; and the mere fact that Hansen was in such a position as to cause to be invoked by his negligence the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act does not mean that he is thereby “insured” within the meaning of the statute.

Appellant has represented to the court that appellee has received from the United States a monetary settlement of appellee’s claim against the United States on account of Hansen’s negligence while driving the uninsured vehicle. That representation is not supported by the record presented to this court nor by evidence presented to the trial court. The partial summary judgment on liability was therefore without error as any benefits appellee *770may have received from the United States may be taken into account in fixing the amount of appellant’s liability. *(Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Graff,*327 So.2d 88 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).)

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and SMITH, J., concur.
|    |                                                                                          |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Nautilus, Inc.; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |

|                        |
|------------------------|
|                        |  |  |
| November 14, 2011 | By: | /s/ Bruce M. Cazenave |
| Date                   |   | Bruce M. Cazenave |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
State Project Applicant Description Funding Amount 

AZ Grand Canyon Bus Replacement National Park Service Acquiring new battery electric buses (BEB) and new compressed natural gas buses (CNG) to 

replace the current aging fleet of CNG buses $27,570,004.00

MT US93 Dublin Gulch Road to Gunlock Road Confederated Salish 

And Kootenai Tribes

Rehabilitation of US93 from Dublin Gulch Road to Gunlock Road, including construction of a 

multi-span bridge over Ninepipes Reservoir, implementation of traffic safety improvements, 

development of wildlife collision reduction infrastructure, roadway reconstruction, and 

development of a shared-use path. 

$30,567,037.00

NC Ecusta Rail Trail: A Multimodal Gateway to the 

Pisgah National Forest and the Blue Ridge Parkway

North Carolina 

Department of 

Transportation

The construction and completion of the entire Ecusta Rail Trail, an 18.8-mile shared-use path on a 

railbanked rail line that will connect the county seats of Henderson and Transylvania Counties in 

Western North Carolina to Pisgah National Forest

$21,412,044.00

NV Wadsworth Bypass Road Pyramid Lake Paiute 

Tribe

Construction of Wadsworth Bypass Road (Indian Route 35) which will be a singular, continuous 

federally owned Tribal transportation facility proposed as a two-lane 2.91 mile long rural arterial 

with grading and drainage, asphalt pavement and shoulders, and intersection improvements

$11,975,454.00

OK Mud Valley Road Cherokee Nation

Improvement of Mud Valley Road (West 770 Road) within the Cherokee Nation Reservation, 

including adding shoulders, replacing three bridges, and improving the line of sight at a skewed 

intersection

$12,932,457.00

UT The Ibapah Road (BIA 1) Safety and Rehabilitation 

Project County of Tooele Project will provide necessary safety and roadway improvements to the principal route that connects US Hwy 93 to the Confederate Tribes of Goshute Reservation $8,346,271.00

VA

Multimodal Beach Access at Chincoteague National 

Wildlife Refuge/Assateague Island National 

Seashore

Fish and Wildlife 

Service

Relocation of the existing public recreational beach to a more stable part of the island; construction 

of a new access road, four new parking lots, and new boardwalks; and paving for a multiuse path $17,744,862.00

Total $130,548,129.00

FY2022 National Significant Federal Lands and Tribal Projects Program Selected Projects
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 14 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

vs.

MICHAEL A. OBERMEYER; BRIAN

MCCOY; ED CAMP; HARRY

NIMROD; LEE ZWEIGLE; ARISTEDES

W. ZAVARAS; JOHN JUBIC; and

RICHARD MARR,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 97-1017

(D.C. No. 96-S-2217)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRORBY, EBEL, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Martinez, an inmate appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the

dismissal of his civil rights action in which he seeks federal declaratory, injunctive and

monetary relief based upon a Colorado conviction. To the extent that Mr. Martinez is
- 2 -

proceeding under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the claims are obviously barred by the rule

announced in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). On the other hand, a

federal challenge to the fact of conviction or confinement, or the duration of confinement,

is cognizable only under habeas corpus, Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 499-500

(1973), with its requirement of exhaustion of state remedies, 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A);

Preiser, 411 U.S. at 499 n.14.

The district court dismissed the action without prejudice based upon

noncompliance with its order requiring Mr. Martinez to file his 28 U.S.C. § 1915 motion

and civil rights complaint on official forms and furnish a certified copy of his trust fund

account, all within thirty days. Aplt. App. 49-54. We find no abuse of discretion. See

Bradenburg v. Beaman, 632 F.2d 120, 122 (10th Cir. 1980) (per curiam), cert. denied,

450 U.S. 984 (1981).

AFFIRMED. All pending motions are DENIED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
David W. Karp, President & CEO 11/11/2014 N orthern Air Cargo, Inc. 4510 Old International Airport Road, Anchorage, AK 99502
**EXHIBIT** **13.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Futuremedia PLC (the “Company”) on Form
      20-F for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities
      and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to his knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:   
                  February 19, 2008
              By:
              */s/
                  George G. O’Leary*Name:
              George
                  G. O’LearyTitle:
              Chief
                  Executive Officer andPrincipal
                  Accounting Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and will be
      retained by NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.