alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                          5,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,334
<CGS>                                            2,940
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (737)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (737)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT APPRAISER**

 

American Appraisal Associates, Inc. (“AAA”) hereby consents to QRS Corporation’s references to the words appraisal and/orappraiser under the Captions: “**Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS**;” “**Note 6: ACQUISITIONS**;” “**Note 7: RESTRUCTURINGEXPENSES**;” “**Note 8: IMPAIRMENT LOSS**;” in its Form 10-K filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

Specifically, AAA consents to QRS Corporation’s reference to AAA’s involvement andassistance in determining the fair value of the assets associated with QRS Corporation’s acquisition of our Tradeweave Digital Photography (“Tradeweave”); as well as the references to AAA’s analysis performed in the fourthquarter of 2001. 

 

Further, AAA consents to QRS Corporation’s reference toAAA’s valuation of Tradeweave common stock, at $1.17 per share. 

 

Additionally, AAA consents to QRS Corporation’s reference to AAA’s valuation of the allocation of purchase price related to the acquisition of Tradeweave.
#### Gerald Wayne SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-582.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 23, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 14, 1970.

Philip Carlton, Jr., and Rex Ryland, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal by the defendant below from a conviction for conspiracy to commit robbery, the appellant has presented a number of points based on his assignments of error. On consideration thereof in the light of the record and briefs we find no reversible error has been made to appear.

*121The case of King v. State, Fla.1958, 104 So.2d 730, relied on by the appellant, is not applicable on the facts of this case, for the reason that this conspiracy did not involve a government agent acting in line of duty. The remark by the attorney for a codefendant, in the course of closing argument, as to his client having testified and presented other witnesses, and as to the appellant not having done so, is not basis for reversal in the circumstances of this case. No comment thereon was made by the prosecuting attorney, who is enjoined by § 918.09 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., from making such comment. The disclosure was not beamed at any question of credibility or of guilt or innocence, but amounted to an explanation by codefendant’s counsel as to why his client would not have the opening and closing in the final arguments, and why the other defendant would have the opening and closing, under the law as provided for in § 918.09. The appellant-defendant did not avail himself of the right to have the court charge the jury that failure of a defendant to testify is not to be considered by the jury in making up the verdict. See Fogler v. State, 96 Fla. 68, 117 So. 694. Cf. DeLuna v. United States, 5 Cir.1962, 308 F.2d 140. To the extent that the testimony of deputy sheriff Flack regarding the enforced detention of the defendant in another city at the time of the commission of the robbery could be considered to imply the defendant was held for some other offense, the action of the trial court in overruling the objection of the defendant thereto was not error, because of the relevancy of such testimony. Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654. We observe no harmful error in the remarks of the court during the course of the trial which appellant argued were prejudicial. On the facts of the case with reference to the alleged conspiracy, the court did not commit error in admitting certain taped conversations revealing admissions, of the appellant, and the court did not err in denying appellant-defendant’s motion for severance based on the admission thereof.

Affirmed.
259 La. 54

#### Succession of Anne Zemurray HAMMETT.

No. 51496.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1971.

In re: Emile J. Dreuil, Jr., as Administrator of the Succession of James L. Atkinson applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 247 So.2d 249.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### Samuel J. TRUELOVE v. BLUE CROSS OF LOUISIANA and Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Co.

No. 62177.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Blue Cross of Louisiana and Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Jackson. 356 So.2d 1113.

Writ denied.

MARCUS, J., would grant a writ.
#### Henry EDGAR, Petitioner, v. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 69-524.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 13, 1970.

*488Guy B. Bailey, Jr., Miami, for petitioner.

Tobias Simon, Pred & Newman, and Elizabeth J. du Fresne, Miami, for respondents.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding began here as an appeal from a circuit court order which (a) found that the amount in controversy under count one of petitioner’s two count complaint was below the minimum amount over which the circuit court has jurisdiction and (b) transferred count one to the civil court of record for trial. The circuit court retained jurisdiction over count two. We declined to grant appel-lees’ motion to dismiss the appeal but entered an order that the appeal should be considered a petition for certiorari. Thereafter petitioner’s counsel proceeded with the cause and argued that the finding and the transfer constituted departures from the essential requirements of law.

If the amount in controversy in one count of a complaint is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the circuit court, that court may not transfer to the civil court of record another count involving an amount insufficient in itself to invoke the jurisdiction of the circuit court. Milhet Caterers, Inc. v. North Western Meat, Inc., Fla.App.1966, 185 So.2d 196. Cf. cases citing the maxim that (in order to avoid a multiplicity of suits) after obtaining jurisdiction of a case for one purpose a court of equity should retain jurisdiction for all purposes to administer full relief including legal remedies (e. g., Knight v. Global Contact Lens, Inc., Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 693). We therefore hold that the transfer in the present case constituted a departure from the essential requirements of law and quash so much of the order bearing the date May 13, 1969, as purported to transfer count one of the cause to the civil court of record.

However the finding concerning the amount in controversy in count one is not a departure from essential requirements of law requiring this court to grant certiorari on this point since (in contrast to the foregoing point) the petitioner would have an adequate remedy on appeal if the finding is erroneous. See Taylor v. Board of Public Instruction of Duval County, Fla.App.1961, 131 So.2d 504, 507.

The order on review is quashed in part.
Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 21   Filed 10/24/06   Page 1 of 12

Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 21   Filed 10/24/06   Page 2 of 12

Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 21   Filed 10/24/06   Page 3 of 12

Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 21   Filed 10/24/06   Page 4 of 12

Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 21   Filed 10/24/06   Page 5 of 12

Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 21   Filed 10/24/06   Page 6 of 12

Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 21   Filed 10/24/06   Page 7 of 12

Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 21   Filed 10/24/06   Page 8 of 12

Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 21   Filed 10/24/06   Page 9 of 12

Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 21   Filed 10/24/06   Page 10 of 12

Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 21   Filed 10/24/06   Page 11 of 12

Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 21   Filed 10/24/06   Page 12 of 12
No. 99-1815.

#### National Labor Relations Board *v.*Kentucky River Community Care, Inc., et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 530 U. S. 1304.] Motions of Service Employees International Union et al. and American Nurses Association for leave to file briefs as *amici curiae*granted.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 31588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13062]

[[Page 31588]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, June 8, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-13062 Filed 5-24-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-108941 ofWashington Group International, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated January30, 2004 of the audit of the consolidated balance sheets of MitteldeutscheBraunkohlengesellschaft mbH, Theissen (Germany) and its subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income,shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended December 31, 2003 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofWashington Group International, Inc. for the year ended January 2, 2004. In thereport, we express the opinion that the consolidated financial statementsreferred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidatedfinancial position of Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft mbH, Theissen(Germany), and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows inconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in Germany. The effectof applying accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ofAmerica on the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2003 and2002 and on shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, audited byus, is fairly presented in Note C to the consolidated financial statements.

 

 
| /s/ DELOITTE  & TOUCHE GMBH |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |
| Deloitte  & Touche GmbH     |
| Halle,  Germany                 |
| March 4,  2004                  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1997
<CASH>                                           9,999
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,750
<INVENTORY>                                    142,413
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               294,316
<PP&E>                                         203,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 688,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,497
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           534
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   688,497
<SALES>                                        720,236
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               720,236
<CGS>                                          369,731
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  622,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (129)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,781
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,340
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,914
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,340
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 29,072
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,354
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
| (1) | the      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended      December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.      78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |        |                                                                                      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |        | /s/      Yossi Attia                                                                      |   |
|   |   | Name:      Yossi AttiaTitle:      Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |   |

----
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Brad W. Rudover, President and director of The Electric Network.com, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Electric Network.com, Inc. for the three month period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Electric Network.com, Inc.

Dated: May 16, 2005
| /s/ Brad W. Rudover |
|---------------------|

Brad W. Rudover

President and Director 

(Principal Executive Officer)
FAA Docket No. 16

- 14

- 04

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

ASSOCIATE ADMINSTRATOR FOR AIRPORTS

N ATIONAL B USINESS A IRCRAFT A SSOCIATION

, K RUEGER A VIATION

, I NC

., H ARRISON F ORD

, J USTICE

A VIATION

, K IM D AVIDSON A VIATION

, I NC

., A ERO F ILM

, Y OURI B UJKO

, J AMES R OSS

, P ARAMOUNT

C ITRUS LLC, AND A IRCRAFT O WNERS AND P ILOTS A SSOCIATION

,

Complainants

,

v.

C ITY OF S ANTA M ONICA

,

Respondent.

RESPONDENT CITY OF S ANTA MONICA’S NOTICE OF APPEAL

From the Director’s Determination issued by Director Byron K. Huffman,

Dated December 4, 2015

M ARSHA J ONES M OUTRIE

J OSEPH L AWRENCE

L ANCE S. G AMS

I VAN C AMPBELL

S ANTA M ONICA C ITY A TTORNEY ’ S

O FFICE

1685 Main Street, Room 310

Santa Monica, CA 90401

Telephone: (310) 458

- 8336 G. B RIAN B USEY

P AUL V ARNADO *

J AMES S IGEL *

M ORRISON & F OERSTER LLP

2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20006

Telephone: (202) 887

- 1500

Z ANE O. G RESHAM

M ORRISON & F OERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 268

- 7000

Counsel for Respondent City of Santa Monica2 Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 16.33(c), notice is hereby given that Respondent the City of

Santa Monica appeals in the above

- named case to the Associate Administrator for Airports of the

Federal Aviation Administration from the adverse Director’s Determination issued on December

4, 2015.

Dated: January 8 , 2016

By: /s/ G. Brian Busey

M ARSHA J ONES M OUTRIE

J OSEPH L AWRENCE

L ANCE S. G AMS

I VAN C AMPBELL

S ANTA M ONICA C ITY A TTORNEY ’ S

O FFICE

1685 Main Street, Room 310

Santa Monica, CA 90401

Telephone: (310) 458

- 8336

Z ANE O. G RESHAM

M ORRISON & F OERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 268

- 7000 G. B RIAN B USEY

P AUL V ARNADO *

J AMES S IGEL *

M ORRISON & F OERSTER LLP

2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20006

Telephone: (202) 887

- 1500

* Application to the District of Columbia Bar

pending. Practice supervised by principals of

firm admitted to District of Columbia Bar.

Counsel for Respondent City of Santa Monica3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, G. Brian Busey, counsel for the City of Santa Monica, hereby certify that pursuant to

14 C.F.R. § 16.33 I have this day served the foregoing Respondent City of Santa Monica’s

Notice of appeal from the Director’s Determination on the following persons by first class mail,

postage prepaid:

Richard K. Simon, Esq.

1700 Decker School Lane

Malibu, CA 90265

rsimon3@verizon.net

Office of the Chief Counsel

Attention: FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk

AGC

- 600

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue SW

Washington, DC 20591

9

- AWA

- AGC

- Part

- l6@faa.gov

Byron K. Huffman, Acting Director

Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue SW

Was hington, DC 20591

Dated: January 8, 2016 /s/ G. Brian Busey
#### Leon G. SHACK v. George L. PATTEN, Clerk Circuit Court.

No. 37743.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Gary Hirstein, as Chief Financial Officer of International Fuel Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|   | (1)    | the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period   ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange   Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section   13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.                                                                                                                               |

Dated:  May 16, 2005

|   | By:    | /s/ GARY HIRSTEIN                       |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                         |
|   |   | Gary Hirstein   Chief Financial Officer |