alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Theodore PENDERGRASS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-847.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 25, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3550 

To clarify training requirements for prescribers of controlled substances. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. BENNET (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To clarify training requirements for prescribers of controlled 

substances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medication Access and 

5 Training Expansion Improvement Act’’ or the ‘‘MATE 

6 Improvement Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REQUIRED TRAINING FOR PRESCRIBERS OF CON8 TROLLED SUBSTANCES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 303 of the Controlled 

10 Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 823) is amended— 

2 

•S 3550 IS

1 (1) by redesignating the second subsection des2 ignated as subsection (l) as subsection (m); and 

3 (2) in subsection (m)(1), as so redesignated— 

4 (A) in subparagraph (A)— 

5 (i) in clause (iv)— 

6 (I) in subclause (I)— 

7 (aa) by inserting ‘‘the Amer8 ican Academy of Family Physi9 cians, the American Podiatric 

10 Medical Association, the Acad11 emy of General Dentistry, the 

12 American Optometric Associa13 tion,’’ before ‘‘or any other orga14 nization’’; 

15 (bb) by striking ‘‘or the 

16 Commission’’ and inserting ‘‘, the 

17 Commission’’; and 

18 (cc) by inserting ‘‘, or the 

19 Council on Podiatric Medical 

20 Education’’ before the semicolon 

21 at the end; and 

22 (II) in subclause (III), by insert23 ing ‘‘or the American Academy of 

24 Family Physicians’’ after ‘‘Associa25 tion’’; and 

3 

•S 3550 IS

1 (ii) in clause (v), in the matter pre2 ceding subclause (I)— 

3 (I) by striking ‘‘osteopathic medi4 cine, dental surgery’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘osteopathic medicine, podiatric medi6 cine, dental surgery’’; and 

7 (II) by striking ‘‘or dental medi8 cine curriculum’’ and inserting ‘‘or 

9 dental or podiatric medicine cur10 riculum’’; and 

11 (B) in subparagraph (B)— 

12 (i) in clause (i)— 

13 (I) by inserting ‘‘the American 

14 Pharmacists Association, the Accredi15 tation Council on Pharmacy Edu16 cation, the American Psychiatric 

17 Nurses Association, the American 

18 Academy of Nursing, the American 

19 Academy of Family Physicians,’’ be20 fore ‘‘or any other organization’’; and 

21 (II) by inserting ‘‘, the American 

22 Academy of Family Physicians,’’ be23 fore ‘‘or the Accreditation Council’’; 

24 and 

25 (ii) in clause (ii)— 

4 

•S 3550 IS

1 (I) by striking ‘‘or accredited 

2 school’’ and inserting ‘‘, an accredited 

3 school’’; and 

4 (II) by inserting ‘‘, or an accred5 ited school of pharmacy’’ before ‘‘in 

6 the United States’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 subsection (a) shall take effect as if enacted on December 

9 29, 2022. 

Æ
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

American National Insurance Company: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 001-3480) on Form 10-12B and Registration No. 133-160698 of Form S-8of American National Insurance Company (the Company) of our reports dated March 8, 2013, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, and the related financial statement schedules I – V, andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, which reports appear in the December 31, 2012, annual report on Form 10-K of the Company. Our report on the consolidated financial statements refersthe Company’s adoption of FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-26, *Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts,*effective January 1, 2012, and application of the retrospective method of adoptionto all prior periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Houston, Texas 

March 8, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,038
<PP&E>                                          21,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 800,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          388,768
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,451
<OTHER-SE>                                     341,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   800,462
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,247
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  295,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,045)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,045)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,045)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.002)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 2 3, 2019 

# Order

Clerk October 2 3, 2019

1578 12 ( 83 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 1578 12

v COA: 3 34024

Wayne CC: 15

- 010216

- FC

ARTHUR LAROME JEMISON

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_______________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the second motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the

time for filing its brief is GRANTED

. The brief will be accepted as timely filed if

submitted on or before December 1 3 , 2019.
The D.C. Freeway Revolt and the Coming of Metro 

Map Gallery 2 

Detail from J. Denison's 1796 Map of the States of Maryland and Delaware shows the links between 

Annapolis, capital of Maryland, and the future Nation's capital between the established towns of 

Bladensburg and Georgetown. 

 (Source: State Roads Commission of Maryland, 1958).
In April 1909, the Maryland State Roads Commission completed its designation of a State road system to 

be improved under the State Road System. This detail of the map shows the selected links between 

Annapolis, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. The southern link via Upper Marlboro was the most 

commonly used route, but the Old Stage Road via Priest Bridge would be upgraded to become the 

shorter National Defense Highway in the 1920s. 

(Source: State Roads Commission of Maryland, 1958)
This detail from the Maryland State Roads Commission's official highway map of 1965 shows the roads 

between the District of Columbia and Annapolis, Maryland, including U.S. 50 and MD 450/Defense 

Highway. 

(Source: Maryland State Roads Commission)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2750]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that a 
meeting of the Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing 
is scheduled to be held from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on March 10, 1997 
and from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on March 11, 1997. The meeting will be 
held at The Sea Turtle Inn, One Ocean Boulevard, Atlantic Beach, 
Florida 32233. The purpose of the meeting is to review planned changes 
and progress in developing paper-and-pencil and computerized enlistment 
tests and renorming of the tests. Persons desiring to make oral 
presentations or submit written statement for consideration at the 
Committee meeting must contact Dr. Jane M. Arabian, Assistant Director, 
Accession Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force 
Management Policy), Room 2B271, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-
4000, telephone (703) 697-9271, no later than February 21, 1997.

    Dated: January 30, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-2750 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
```

[104th Congress Private Law 2]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl002.104]

[[Page 1]]

Private Law 104-2
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
For the relief of Nathan C. Vance, and for other purposes. <<NOTE:  July 
                         29, 1996 -  [S. 966]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT TO NATHAN C. VANCE.

    (a) Payment.--Subject to subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary of 
Agriculture shall pay $4,850.00 to Nathan C. Vance of Wyoming for fire 
loss arising out of the Mink Area Fire in and around Yellowstone 
National Park in 1988.
    (b) Source of Funds.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay the 
amount specified in subsection (a) from amounts made available under 
section 1304 of title 31, United States Code.
    (c) Condition of Payment.--The payment made pursuant to subsection 
(a) shall be in full satisfaction of the claim of Nathan C. Vance 
against the United States, for fire loss arising out of the Mink Area 
Fire, that was received by the Forest Service in August 1990.

    Approved July 29, 1996.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         10,116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,116
<CGS>                                            5,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,128)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,128)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,128)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
# L_2005311EN.01003901.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/39

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 24 November 2005

repealing Decisions 1999/355/EC and 2001/219/EC

(notified under document number C(2005) 4500)

(2005/829/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community (1), and in particular Article 16(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 1999/355/EC of 26 May 1999 on emergency measures against the dissemination of Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky) as regards China (except Hong Kong) (2) and Commission Decision 2001/219/EC of 12 March 2001 on temporary emergency measures in respect of wood packing comprised in whole or in part of non-manufactured coniferous wood originating in Canada, China, Japan and the United States of America (3) have become obsolete since the relevant provisions are now set out in Directive 2000/29/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 1999/355/EC of 26 May 1999 on emergency measures against the dissemination of Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky) as regards China (except Hong Kong) (2) and Commission Decision 2001/219/EC of 12 March 2001 on temporary emergency measures in respect of wood packing comprised in whole or in part of non-manufactured coniferous wood originating in Canada, China, Japan and the United States of America (3) have become obsolete since the relevant provisions are now set out in Directive 2000/29/EC.

| (2) | Accordingly, in the interests of consistency and clarity of Community legislation, Decisions 1999/355/EC and 2001/219/EC should be repealed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Accordingly, in the interests of consistency and clarity of Community legislation, Decisions 1999/355/EC and 2001/219/EC should be repealed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant Health, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decisions 1999/355/EC and 2001/219/EC are repealed.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 November 2005.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2005/16/EC (OJ L 57, 3.3.2005, p. 19).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 137, 1.6.1999, p. 45. Decision as amended by Decision 99/516/EC (OJ L 197, 29.7.1999, p. 43).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 81, 21.3.2001, p. 39.

3

---
<PAGE>
<PAGE>          103
                             CHATWINS GROUP, INC.
                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
              (In thousands, except ratios and interest factor)

                                             YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                  -------------------------------------------
                                     1993     1994     1995     1996     1997
                                  -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
     EARNINGS:
Income before income taxes, 
  equity loss, extraordinary 
  item and cumulative effect of 
  change in accounting principle  $ 1,132  $ 1,531  $ 5,334  $    25  $ 3,172
Interest expense                    5,784    8,123    9,236    8,927    9,226
Equity in loss of affiliate (3)    (1,589)     (90)       -        -        -
Amortization of debt issuance 
  expense                             395      444      564      632      550
Interest portion of rent 
  expense (1)                         317      378      418      469      763
                                  -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
     Earnings                     $ 6,039  $10,386  $15,552  $10,053  $13,711
                                  =======  =======  =======  =======  =======

     FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                  $ 5,784  $ 8,123  $ 9,236  $ 8,927  $ 9,226
Amortization of debt issuance 
  expense                             395      444      564      632      550
Interest portion of rent 
  expense (1)                         317      378      418      469      763
                                  -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
     Fixed charges                $ 6,496  $ 8,945  $10,218  $10,028  $10,539
                                  =======  =======  =======  =======  =======

RATIO (2)                               -     1.16     1.52     1.00     1.30
                                  =======  =======  =======  =======  =======

(1) - Interest portion of rent expense is calculated as follows: 

Rent expense                      $   953  $ 1,135  $ 1,254  $ 1,407  $ 2,290
Portion deemed representative
   of interest                       33.3%    33.3%    33.3%    33.3%    33.3%
                                  -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
Interest portion of rent expense  $   317  $   378  $   418  $   469  $   763
                                  =======  =======  =======  =======  =======

(2) - Additional income from continuing operations of $206 would be necessary
to attain a ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 1.00 for the year ended
December 31, 1993.

(3) - Equity in loss of affiliate relates to the Company's 49% investment in
CGII.  The Company indirectly services CGII's debt as its debt is owed to the
Company.  Accordingly, the Company's share of CGII's results are deducted from
earnings for the purpose of determining the ratio of earnings to fixed
charges.
#### The HYDRAULIC PRESS CORP. et al. v. Elek K. BENEDEK.

No. 7493.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 11, 1937.

Toulmin & Toulmin, of Dayton, Ohio, and Day, Young & Veach, of Qeveland, Ohio, for appellant.

J. Harrow Leonard, of Cleveland, Ohio, J. D. Sears, of Bucyrus, Ohio, Walter Dressel, of Mt. Gilead, Ohio, and Albert R. Golrick, of Qeveland, Ohio, for appellees.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon application of appellant the appeal in the above-entitled case is dismissed, at appellant’s costs.
Virtual Tour

Take the self-guided tour anytime—

on a computer or a smartphone!

GENERAL ADMISSION 

https://highways.dot.gov/research/tfhrcNirtualTour/home
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5389-5390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2776]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-209-000]


Transwestern Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

January 30, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 27, 1997, Transwestern Pipeline Company 
(Transwestern), 1400 Smith Street, Post Office Box 1188, Houston, Texas 
77251-1188 filed a request with the Commission in Docket No. CP97-209-
000, pursuant to Sections 157.205, and 157.212 of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to 
install and operate a new delivery point which would accommodate 
interruptible natural gas deliveries to GPM Gas Corporation (GPM) 
authorized in blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-534-000, 
all as more fully set forth in the request on file with the Commission 
and open to public inspection.
    Transwestern proposes to install and operate a new delivery point, 
located in Sherman County, Texas, at GPM's request which would provide 
compressor fuel and starting gas for use at its plant. The proposed 
volumes to be delivered would be 500 MMBtu on a peak day and 182,500 
MMBtu on an annual basis. Transwestern estimates the cost of 
constructing the delivery point would be $16,500.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to 157.205 of the Regulations under 
the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is 
filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity shall be

[[Page 5390]]

deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time allowed for 
filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 
days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant request 
shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant to 
Section 7 of the NGA.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2776 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### L. E. GRIFFIN, Sr. v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50010.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 7, 1977.

Alexander & Johnston, W. Brooks Alexander, III, Cleveland, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Henry T. Wingate, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Bolivar County; J. C. Feduccia, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., LEE and BOWLING, JJ., and RUFUS H. BROOME, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED AS TO CONVICTION; and REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF JUDGMENT.

PATTERSON, C. J., INZER, P. J., ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER BROOM, JJ., concur. P P {=» ¡=s O- *Cu*