alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference of our report dated  February 5, 1996 in his Form 10-K into the Morgan
Group, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration
Nos.  33-72996,  33-72998).  It should  be noted  that we have not  audited  any
financial statements of The Morgan Group, Inc. subsequent to December 31, 195 or
performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.


                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 27, 1997
# EUR-Lex - 32005M3857 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005M3857

**Commission Decision of 29/07/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3857 - SITA / FLUGHAFEN DÜSSELDORF / FDITG) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

| |Brussels, 29.07.2005

SG-Greffe(2005) D/204117

To the notifying parties

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject : Case No. COMP/M.3857 - SITA/Flughafen Düsseldorf/FDITG Notification of 01.07.2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 172, 12.7.2005, p. 19.

1. On 01.07.2005 , the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which the undertakings SITA Information Networking Computing BV (“SITA”, The Netherlands) and Flughafen Düsseldorf GmbH (“Flughafen Düsseldorf”, Germany), controlled by the city of Düsseldorf (“Stadt Düsseldorf”, Germany) and Hochtief AG (“Hochtief”, Germany), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of Flughafen Düsseldorf Informationstechnologie GmbH (“FDITG”, Germany), currently solely controlled by Flughafen Düsseldorf, by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- For SITA: provision of information and telecommunications services to global air transport and related industries

- for Flughafen Düsseldorf: operation of Düsseldorf airport in Germany

- for FDITG: provision and marketing of IT and telecommunications services for the campus of the Düsseldorf airport and business park “Airport City”

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraphs a and c, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004[2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
COURT OF CHANCERY

OF THE

STATE OF DELAWARE

K ATHALEEN S T

. J UDE M C C ORMICK

C HANCELLOR L EONARD L. W ILLIAMS J USTICE C ENTER

500 N. K ING S TREET

, S UITE 11400

W ILMINGTON

, D ELAWARE 19801

- 3734

June 2 7 , 2024

Gregory V. Varallo

Glenn R. McGillivray

Daniel E. Meyer

BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ

BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP

500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 901

Wilmington, DE 19801

Peter B. Andrews

Craig J. Springer

David M. Sborz

Andrew J. Peach

Jackson E. Warren

ANDREWS & SPRINGER LLC

4001 Kennett Pike, Suite 250

Wilmington, DE 19807

David E. Ross

Garrett B. Moritz

Thomas C. Mandracchia

ROSS ARONSTAM & MORITZ LLP

1313 North Market St., Suite 1001

Wilmington, DE 19801

Catherine A. Gaul

Randall J. Teti

ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A.

500 Delaware Ave nue , 8th Floor

Wilmington, DE 19801

John L. Reed

Ronald N. Brown, III

Caleb G. Johnson

Daniel P. Klusman

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

1201 N. Market Street, Suite 2100

Wilmington, DE 19801 William M. Lafferty

Susan W. Waesco

Ryan D. Stottmann

Miranda N. Gilbert

Jacob M. Perrone

MORRIS, NICHOLS,

ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP

1201 N. Market Street, 16th Floor

Wilmington, DE 19801

Rudolf Koch

John D. Hendershot

Kevin M. Gallagher

Andrew L. Milam

RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.

One Rodney Square

920 North King Street

Wilmington, DE 19801

David S. Eagle

Sally E. Veghte

KLEHR HARRISON HARVEY

BRANZBURG LLP

919 N. Market Street, Suite 1000

Wilmington, DE 19801

Anthony A. Rickey

MARGRAVE LAW LLC

3411 Silverside Road

Baynard Building, Suite 104

Wilmington, DE 19810

Theodore A. Kittila

HALLORAN FARKAS + KITTILA LLP

5722 Kennett Pike

Wilmington, DE 19807C.A. No. 2018

- 0408

- KSJM

June 2 7 , 2024

Page 1 of 2

Re: Richard J. Tornetta v. Elon Musk , et al.,

C.A. No. 2018

- 0408

- KSJM

Dear Counsel:

This letter addresses the defendants’ June 20, 2024 motion to vacate the

current schedule and order expedited briefing on the effect of the Tesla stockholders’

June 13, 2024 vote on this action. 1 The motion is granted in part.

The parties are ordered to brief the effect of the s tockholder v ote consistent

with the expedited schedule th at the defendants proposed and subject to the word

limits set out in Court of Chancery Rule 7(c)(3) . The parties are instructed to contact

my C hambers to set a hearing on those issue s for late July or the first week in August.

But we will go forward with the July 8, 2024 hearing on the plaintiff’s fee petition

and objections to that petition.

Given that we will hold a separate oral argument devoted solely to the

questions raised by the s tockholder v ote, for the purposes of the July 8 hearing , the

parties are instructed to argue the points at issue without regard to the stockholder

vote. All arguments concerning the stockholder vote will be deemed preserved.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sincerely,

/s/ Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick

Chancellor

cc: All counsel of record ( by File & ServeXpress )

1 C.A. No. 2018

- 0408

- KSJM, Docket 3 86

.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3454 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3454

  To prohibit the use of Federal funds to purchase at-home tests for 
               SARS-CoV-2 from certain foreign entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2023

  Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Braun, and Mr. 
    Hawley) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the use of Federal funds to purchase at-home tests for 
               SARS-CoV-2 from certain foreign entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Taxpayer Dollars for Communist 
China COVID Tests Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USING FEDERAL FUNDS TO PURCHASE CERTAIN TESTS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be 
used to purchase any at-home test for SARS-CoV-2 that is--
            (1) manufactured, in whole or in part, in the People's 
        Republic of China;
            (2) imported from the People's Republic of China; or
            (3) manufactured by any entity that is a subsidiary of a 
        Chinese company.
                                 <all>
```
#### Maxwell H. BYRD, Bankrupt Appellant, v. Herbert E. PERKINS, Assignee, Appellee.

No. 4111.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Oct. 5, 1936.

Anna W. Carton, of Baltimore, Md., for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

On motion of appellant petition for appeal is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28053]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-373-003]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

Ocotober 17, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 14, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
December 1, 1997:

2nd Sub Third Revised Sheet No. 1501
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 1807

    Koch states that it is submitting the above listed tariff sheets to 
correct certain omissions from the May 30, 1997, filing in this 
proceeding. Specifically, Koch states that it has revised Sections 8.3 
and 11.4(c)(4) of the General Terms and Conditions to reflect the 
correct procedures applicable under zone based rates.
    Koch states that it has served copies of the instant filing upon 
each person on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's rules and regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided by Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28053 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION
-------------

I, Scott Thornock, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nicklebys.com, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us by  others  within  those  entities,
     particularly  during  the period in which  this  quarterly  report is being
     prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
     and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
     effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
     controls; and

6.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have indicated in this
     quarterly report whether or not there were significant  changes in internal
     controls  or in other  factors  that could  significantly  affect  internal
     controls  subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

Date: August 19, 2004


/s/ Scott Thornock
--------------------------------------
Scott Thornock
Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer



                                       11
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3408 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3408

 To amend the Wagner-Peyser Act to allow States the flexibility to use 
   staffing arrangements that best suit their needs, for employment 
                            service offices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2023

  Mr. Cassidy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Wagner-Peyser Act to allow States the flexibility to use 
   staffing arrangements that best suit their needs, for employment 
                            service offices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pathways to Paychecks Act''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT SERVICE OFFICES.

    Section 9 of the Wagner-Peyser Act (29 U.S.C. 49h) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) States may use State merit staff or other staff allowable 
under part 200 of title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (or a successor 
regulation), to carry out the duties of employment service offices 
under this Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
CAUSE NUMBER 05-15-00609-CR

JOHN RANGEL § ON APPEAL FROM THE § v. § FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS § THE STATE OF TEXAS § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

EXTENSION FOR FILING PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

JOHN RANGEL, through Court appointed counsel moves the Court to extend the time for Appellant to petition the Court for review and shows:

1. Counsel was appointed on appeal.

2. The Court of Appeals opinion was issued on May 19, 2016.

3. The deadline for filing the Petition for Discretionary Review is 30 days from that date.

4. Appellant needs additional time to prepare the Petition for Discretionary Review.

CONCLUSION

THEREFORE, Appellant requests a 30 day extension to file a Petition for Discretionary Review.

Respectfully submitted:

/s/Allan Fishburn
Allan Fishburn
211 N. Record
Suite 450 Dallas, Texas 75202 (214)761-9170 (214) 742-7313 Fax allanfishburn@yahoo.com PD-0598-16 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 6/2/2016 2:16:03 PM Accepted 6/2/2016 4:04:24 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
#### Carl Carey ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-585.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 1971.

Max P. Engel, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Alan M. Medof, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty of robbery after a trial before the court without jury. At the trial he was represented by privately employed counsel. The judgment was appealed and affirmed by this court. Roberts v. State, Fla.App.1969, 226 So.2d 7. A petition for certiorari was filed in the Supreme Court of Florida and denied. Thereafter appellant filed, pursuant to Rule 1.850 CrPR, 33 F.S.A., a petition to vacate the judgment and sentence. The petition was denied by the trial court after a full evidentiary hearing. This appeal is from that order.

The point presented on appeal is all encompassing :

> “The court erred in failing to grant the appellant’s motion to vacate based on *192each of the points of law presented which showed violations of the appellant’s rights to due process of law under the Federal and Florida State Constitutions.”

Faced with so broad an attack, we have examined the record in the light of the contentions made before the trial court and find that the contentions made upon the motion have already been passed upon by this court on the first appeal. The order appealed is therefore affirmed. Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 226 So.2d 7.

Affirmed.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.4    
  


 
 

Participation agreement dated 20 December 2002 between TNT Post Groep N.V. and the
  Stichting pensioenfonds TNT Post Groep (English summary of Dutch agreement)    
  


        (Aansluitingsovereenkomst van de TNT Post Groep N.V. bij de Stichting pensioenfonds TNT Post Groep) 



        English
summary 



 Parties:  



	1.
	TNT
Post Groep N.V., representing itself and its group companies which are subject to the collective labour agreement for TNT Post Groep N.V. is applicable (the company)



	2.
	Stichting
pensioenfonds TNT Post Groep, with its registered offices in Groningen (the Fund). 



 Material Obligations  




        The company has the obligation to register all its employees that are subject to our Dutch collective labour agreement for participation in the Fund. 


        The
Fund shall grant participating employees pension entitlements in accordance with its articles of association and pension scheme. The company has the obligation to pay the yearly
premiums to the Fund to cover the financial consequences of the obligations of the Fund under its articles of association and pension scheme. 


        The
Fund requires prior written approval of the company for the following resolutions: 



	a.
	acceptance
of an undertaking or an institution as participating undertaking as described in article 2 of its articles of association,



	b.
	adoption
or amendment of the articles of association and/or the pension scheme(s),



	c.
	dissolution
or liquidation of the Fund,



	d.
	determination
of the yearly average pension percentages as described in this agreement,



	e.
	determination
of the change in percentage of the pension entitlements as described in article18 and 19 of the pension scheme and the pension limit amounts for computation of the
Pension computation base A and B as described in article 5 of the pension scheme,



	f.
	determination
of the franchise as described in article 5 under 5, sub c of the pension scheme,



	g.
	determination
of emoluments as part of the annual salary, as described in article 5, under 3, sub a of the pension scheme,



	h.
	deviation
of the terms of the pension scheme for a (group of) participant(s) as described in article 24, 25 and 26 of the pension scheme. 














QuickLinks


Exhibit 4.4

Participation agreement dated 20 December 2002 between TNT Post Groep N.V. and the Stichting pensioenfonds TNT Post Groep (English summary of Dutch agreement)
EXHIBIT 10.7





SECOND AMENDMENT TO PALO ALTO LEASE





SECOND ADDENDEM TO THAT CERTAIN LEASE AGREEMENT


DATED FEBRARY 25, 1993, BY AND BETWEEN


2197 EAST BAYSHORE ROAD PARTNERSHIP (LESSOR)


AND MYSOFTWARE COMPNAY, INC. (LESSEE) FOR


PREMISES COMMONNLY KNOWN AS


2197 EAST BAYSHORE ROAD, PALO ALTO, CA.





It is hereby agreed by the above referenced parties as
follows





1.    Beginning August 1, 1995, Lessee shall lease as an addition to their
premise the office highlighted in yellow as hereby attached. The size of this additional space shall be 123 square feet.





2.    In consideration for this additional space, Lessee is to pay as additional rent the monthly amount of one hundred twenty seven dollars (127.00).





3.    All terms and conditions of the lease and addendum shall remain full force and effect.





Agreed:2197 EAST BAYSHORE ROAD PARTNSHIP





MYSOFTWAREBy

/s/    Debra Holvick



By

/s/    Dave P. MansDATE             8/1/95





DATE            8/1/95
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.2


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the:

1.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-74634) pertaining to the Regal
     Cinemas, Inc. Participant Stock Option Plan, Regal Cinemas, Inc. Employee
     Stock Option Plan, 1993 Employee Stock Incentive Plan and 1993 Outside
     Directors' Stock Option Plan of Regal Cinemas, Inc.;

2.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-13295) pertaining to the 401(k)
     Profit Sharing Plan of Regal Cinemas, Inc.;

3.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-13291) pertaining to the 1993
     Employee Stock Incentive Plan of Regal Cinemas, Inc.;

of our report dated March 21, 1995 (with respect to the financial statements of
Neighborhood Entertainment, Inc. not separately presented) appearing in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Regal Cinemas, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
January 2, 1997.



                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Richmond, Virginia
March 26, 1997
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99
<PAGE>

                       CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Michael J. Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Drummond Financial Corporation (the "Registrant"), certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Annual Report of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended June 30,
          2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
          or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.

Dated: October 24, 2002

                                                  /s/ Michael J. Smith
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  Michael J. Smith
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer