Mr. Bob Sik 

Vice President 

Akron Foundry Company 

2728 Wingate Avenue 

P.O. Box 27028 

Akron, Ohio 44319­0009 

Dear Mr. Sik: 

Thank you for your January 6 letter sent via email requesting Federal Highway Administration 

(FHWA) acceptance of a modification to the installation of your company’s cast aluminum 

transformer bases. You requested that we find the use of “stack pack” rectangular washers 

with these bases acceptable for use on the National Highway System (NHS) under the 

provisions of National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 

“Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features.”

Introduction

Testing of the supports was in compliance with the guidelines contained in the NCHRP Report 

350, Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. Requirements for breakaway supports are those in the American Association of State Highway 

and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for

Highway Signs, Luminaires and Traffic Signals.

Testing

Full­scale automobile testing and pendulum testing has been conducted on your company’s

cast aluminum bases resulting in a number of the FHWA acceptance letters being written. You 

noted that some installers have been placing your bases on smaller bolt circles than they have 

been designed for. Using conventional round washers does not provide enough contact 

between the anchor bolts and the tabs on the bottom of the casting. The purpose of the 

rectangular washers is to better distribute the loading from the pole to the foundation. We 

concur in your assertion that the use of smaller diameter bolt circles with the stack pack 

400 Seventh St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590

In Reply Refer To: HSA­10/LS­58 

February 8, 2005
2 

washers used to distribute the load will not have an adverse affect on the breakaway 

performance of these transformer bases. However, the washers should not be used to distribute 

the loading outside of diameter of the largest bolt circle they were tested with.

Findings

The modifications to the installation details of your cast aluminum transformer bases, as

described above, are acceptable for use as Test Level 3 devices on the NHS under the range of

conditions tested, with the exception of the use of a smaller bolt circle diameter, when 

proposed by a State.

Please note the following standard provisions, which apply to the FHWA letters of acceptance:

· Our acceptance is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the devices and does

not cover their structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic 

Control Devices. · Any changes that may adversely influence the crashworthiness of the device will require 

a new acceptance letter. · Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in­service 

performance reveals unacceptable safety problems, or that the device being marketed is

significantly different from the version that was crash tested, it reserves the right to 

modify or revoke its acceptance. · You will be expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and 

installation requirements to ensure proper performance.

· You will be expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has

essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for

acceptance, and that they will meet the crashworthiness requirements of the FHWA and 

the NCHRP Report 350.

· To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of acceptance, designated as number 

LS­58 shall not be reproduced except in full. As this letter and the supporting 

documentation which support it become public information, it will be available for

inspection at our office by interested parties. · Akron Foundry are patented devices and considered "proprietary.”  When proprietary 

devices are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal­aid projects they: (a) must 

be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented items; (b) the 

highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization with existing 

highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists or; (c) they must be used 

for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short sections of road 

for experimental purposes. These provisions do not apply to exempt non­NHS projects. Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of

Federal Regulations, Section 635.411, a copy of which is enclosed.
3

· This acceptance letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to 

use, manufacture, or sell any patented device. Patent issues are to be resolved by the 

applicant and the patent owner.

Sincerely yours,

/Original Signed by Harry W. Taylor/  ~for~

John R. Baxter, P.E.

Director, Office of Safety Design 

Office of Safety 

Enclosure 

FHWA:HSA­10:NArtimovich:tb:x61331:2/7/05 

File:  h://directory folder/artimovich/LS58AkronFIN 

cc:  HSA­10 (Reader, HSA­1; Chron File, HSA­10; 

N.Artimovich, HSA­10)