alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-1010 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MARITIME INTERDICTION 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and THE GAMBIA 

Signed at Banjul October 10, 2011 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
THE GAMBIA 

Maritime Interdiction 

 Agreement signed at Banjul October 10, 2011; 

 Entered into force October 10, 2011.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27533]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984.
    Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the 
Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 
N.W., Room 962. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement 
to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, 
within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.
    Agreement No.: 224-201036.
    Title: Port of New Orleans/Maritrend, Inc. Lease Agreement.
    Parties:

    The Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans (``Port'')
    Maritrend, Inc. (``Maritrend'')

    Synopsis: The proposed Agreement authorities the Port to lease to 
Maritrend 9.33 acres, and improvements thereon, at the Port's Alabo 
Street facilities for a period of one year, with the option to extend 
the lease for two additional renewal periods of one year each.

    Dated: October 10, 1997.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Ronald D. Murphy,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27533 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
#### Curley FAULKNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-4.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 24, 1969.

Robert E. Pierce, Public Defender, Lees-burg, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PIERCE, Judge.

Appellant Curley Faulkner appeals to this Court an order entered by the Lake County Circuit Court denying, without evi-dentiary hearing, his petition for relief under CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A.

On December 21, 1967, Faulkner, with the assistance of Court-appointed counsel, pleaded guilty to an information charging him with larceny of an automobile, and on the same date he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment. Faulkner appealed directly to this Court from said judgment and sentence, resulting in an affirmance by this Court on September 25, 1968, 214 So.2d 40, disposing of the merits of the case adverse to Faulkner.

Thereafter, on March 20, 1968, Faulkner filed his Motion under CrPR 1.850 to vacate collaterally the sentence aforesaid, which Motion on November 13, 1969 was denied. It is from this latter order that the instant appeal was taken by Faulkner, and the local Public Defender, by appointment of the trial Court, represented Faulkner here. All the grounds of the post-conviction motion were urged before this Court upon the prior appeal and disposed of by this Court’s opinion therein. With commendable candor, Faulkner’s present counsel states in his brief that he “has made a thorough and sincere examination of the record and the Transcript of Testimony and has examined his own records and is unable in good conscience to point out to this Court any errors made by the Trial Court.” The Attorney General understandably finds no quarrel with such observation. Neither do we, after a searching examination of the Transcript of Record and Briefs filed here. The order appealed from is therefore—

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and MANN, J., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-31017 Summary Calendar
JEFFREY NEAL MCKNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STATE OF LOUISIANA BESE BOARD, STATE OF LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CECIL PICARD, Superintendent, THE LOUISIANA LEGISLATURE Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the District Court for the Middle District Of Louisiana

No. 06-320-C-M2

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellant Jeffrey Neal McKnight is appealing a dismissal under FED . R. C IV . P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a cognizable claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. . We review dismissal under FED . R. C IV . P. 12(b)(6) de novo
. Martin K. Eby Constr. Co. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit , 369 F.3d 464, 467 (5th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted). We agree with the district court that the complainant fails to statea claim under Title VII, since a student is not considered an

employee of a school. See O’Connor v. Davis , 126 F.3d 112, 116 (2nd Cir. 1997). See also McGuinness v. Univ. of New Mexico Sch. of Med. , 170 F.3d 974, 979 (10th Cir. 1998) . The complaint is vague as to how his claims amount to constitutional violations or violations of other federal laws warranting relief.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of iParty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 25, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 8, 2005 |
|---------------------------------|
|                            | /s/ SAL PERISANO |   |
|                            | Sal Perisano |
|                            | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Clinton WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-968.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 3, 1971.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; Warren H. Edwards Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Raymond Louis BRESCIANI and Connie L. Bresciani, husband and wife, Appellants, v. Dennis E. O’BRIEN et al., Appellees.

No. 77-1466.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 12, 1978.

Rehearings Denied May 10, 1978.

Ronald A. Cyril and Leslie Telford, of Nelson, Hesse, Cyril, Weber & Sparrow, Sarasota, for appellants.

Patrick J. Murphy, of Crabtree, Butler, Syprett & Meshad, Sarasota, for appellees Palmer First Nat. Bank and Trust Co. and Hartford Accident and Indem. Co.

Jeffrey G. Wood, of Livingston, Patterson & Wood, Sarasota, for appellee Southeast First Nat. Bank of Sarasota.

BOARDMAN, Chief Judge.

Appellants/plaintiffs, Raymond Louis and Connie L. Bresciani, appeal a final summary judgment entered in favor of appel-lees/defendants, Palmer First National Bank and Trust Co. of Sarasota (Palmer), Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. (Hartford), and Southeast First National Bank of Sarasota (Southeast) in a personal injury action. Hartford was Palmer’s liability insurance carrier. Southeast pur*754chased the assets of Palmer in January 1976. The complaint alleged that Palmer was the owner of an automobile negligently driven by appellee/defendant Dennis O’Brien, causing injuries to Raymond Bres-ciani on July 13, 1975. In their motion for summary judgment Palmer and Hartford stated that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that at the time of the accident it “was nothing more than a secured lien holder in said automobile. Southeast also moved for summary judgment stating that there was no fact issue to be resolved as to the ownership. The trial court granted the motions.

It cannot be said that the evidence relating to the critical issue of whether Palmer was the beneficial owner of the vehicle is not in dispute, and therefore, a material fact has not been resolved. Consequently, this issue should not have been determined by a summary judgment. *See, e. g., Register v. Redding,*126 So.2d 289 (Fla.1st DCA 1961). Accordingly, the summary judgment is reversed and this cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HOBSON and OTT, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARLON RUMPH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 245 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of January, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3542 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 601
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3542

   To amend the Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Act to modify the 
   boundary of the Atchafalaya National Heritage Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2023

  Mr. Cassidy (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           November 21, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Manchin, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Act to modify the 
   boundary of the Atchafalaya National Heritage Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Atchafalaya National Heritage Area 
Boundary Modification Act''.

SEC. 2. ATCHAFALAYA NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

    (a) Boundaries.--Section 213(b) of the Atchafalaya National 
Heritage Area Act (54 U.S.C. 120102 note; Public Law 109-338; 120 Stat. 
1791) is amended by striking ``and Ascension'' and inserting 
``Ascension, and Lafourche''.
    (b) Composition of Local Coordinating Entity.--Section 213(c)(2) of 
the Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Act (54 U.S.C. 120102 note; 
Public Law 109-338; 120 Stat. 1791) is amended by striking ``14'' and 
inserting ``15''.
                                                       Calendar No. 601

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3542

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend the Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Act to modify the 
   boundary of the Atchafalaya National Heritage Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 21, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27923]



[[Page 54843]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-46-002]


Kentucky West Virginia Gas Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

October 16, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 10, 1997, Kentucky West Virginia Gas 
Company, L.L.C. (Kentucky West), tendered for filing to its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, with the following tariff sheets to 
be effective October 1, 1997:

Second Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 4
Second Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 5

    Kentucky West states that the proposed tariff sheets are submitted 
in compliance with the ``Order of the Director Accepting, Rejecting and 
Allowing Withdrawal of Tariff Sheets'' issued by the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (``Commission'') on September 29, 1997 in Docket 
No. TM98-1-46-001. In the Order, the Commission accepted the tariff 
sheets effective October 1, 1997, subject to conditions.
    Kentucky West states that the tariff sheets proposed herein remove 
the minor typographical changes which were not ACA related as required 
by the Commission.
    Pursuant to Section 154.207 of the Commission's Regulations, 
Kentucky West requests that the Commission grant any waivers necessary 
to permit the tariff sheets contained herein to become effective 
October 1, 1997.
    Kentucky West states that a copy of its filing has been served upon 
its customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make Protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27923 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### ADOBE BRICK AND SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. BAY ROC, INC., a Florida corporation; Charles Volpe, d/b/a Volpe Plastering; and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-809.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 25, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55785-55786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28443]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 102097B]


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.


[[Page 55786]]


ACTION: Notice of advisory group meetings scheduled in November, 1997.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) 
Vessel Bycatch Accountability (VBA) Committee and Gulf of Alaska and 
Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands groundfish plan teams will hold meetings in 
November in Seattle, WA.

DATES: The VBA Committee will meet Friday, November 14, 1997, beginning 
at 8:00 a.m.
    The groundfish plan teams will meet November 17-21, 1997, beginning 
at 1:00 p.m. on Monday, November 17.

ADDRESSES: VBA Committee: Nordby Conference Center, Suite A, 
Fishermen's Terminal, 1711 W. Nickerson, Seattle, WA.
    Plan teams: Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way 
NE., Building 4, Room 2079, Seattle, WA.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Witherell, telephone: 907-271-
2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    1. The VBA Committee will further define options of a vessel 
bycatch accountability program, with emphasis on initial and annual 
allocations.
    2. The groundfish plan teams will review any new stock assessment 
information and catch statistics, prepare final stock assessment 
documents for the 1998 groundfish fisheries in the Gulf of Alaska and 
Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands, and prepare recommendations for acceptable 
biological catches for individual species. The teams will also discuss 
streamlining the process of setting annual total allowable catches and 
review research needs and priorities.
    Although other issues not contained in this agenda may come before 
the Committee or Plan Teams for discussion, in accordance with the 
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, those issues 
may not be the subject of formal action during the meetings. Committee 
or Plan Team action will be restricted to those issues specifically 
identified in the agenda listed in this notice.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Helen Allen, 907-271-2809, at 
least 5 working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: October 21, 1997.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-28443 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. David Brow, Treasurer, Secretary and director of The Electric Network.com, Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Electric Network.com Inc;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2004

/s/ J. David Brow					J. David Brow
Treasurer, Secretary and director
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ARTHUR BRAIN B. HEATH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 181 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ARTHUR BRAIN B. HEATH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 182 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00481-CR

Kevin Reid Althouse

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 9

of Tarrant County (1477886)

April 20, 2017

Per Curiam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM