alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  November 7, 2008 | By:                                                                      | /s/                  SANDRINE CRISAFULLI |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                    |  Sandrine                  CrisafulliChief                  Financial Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3035 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3035

 To prohibit the use of Federal funds for gender transition in minors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 4, 2023

  Mr. Lee (for himself, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. 
Rubio, Mr. Daines, Mr. Braun, Mr. Cruz, and Mr. Wicker) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of Federal funds for gender transition in minors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Our Kids from Harmful 
Research Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR GENDER TRANSITION IN 
              MINORS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
Federal funds may be used to fund research or publications relating to 
gender transition in individuals under the age of 18, including any 
observational studies that gather evidence on the provision of hormonal 
treatments or surgical procedures on minors, for the purpose of--
            (1) affirming a minor's perception of his or her sex, if 
        that perception is incongruent with such minor's sex; or
            (2) affirming a minor's asserted identity, if the asserted 
        identity is incongruent with such minor's sex.
    (b) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``sex'' 
shall be recognized based solely on a person's reproductive biology and 
genetics at birth.
                                 <all>
```
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3224 

To codify Internal Revenue Service guidance relating to treatment of certain 

services and items for chronic conditions as meeting the preventive care 

deductible safe harbor for purposes of high deductible health plans in 

connection with health savings accounts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2023 

Mr. THUNE (for himself and Mr. CARPER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To codify Internal Revenue Service guidance relating to 

treatment of certain services and items for chronic conditions as meeting the preventive care deductible safe harbor for purposes of high deductible health plans in connection with health savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chronic Disease Flexi5 ble Coverage Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3224 IS

1 SEC. 2. SERVICES AND ITEMS FOR CHRONIC CONDITIONS 

2 TREATED AS PREVENTIVE CARE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The additional preventive care 

4 services and items for chronic conditions that may be 

5 treated as preventive care for purposes of section 

6 223(c)(2)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as set 

7 forth in IRS Notice 2019–45 shall have the same force 

8 and effect as if included in the enactment of this Act. 

9 (b) NO INFERENCE.—To the extent not inconsistent 

10 with this subsection, no inference shall be made from such 

11 subsection with respect to such other rules or guidance 

12 as the Secretary has provided, or may provide, with re13 spect to preventive services for purposes of section 

14 223(c)(2)(C) of such Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of The Town and Country Trust of our report dated January 29, 2001, included in
the 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders of the Town and Country Trust.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of The Town and
Country Trust listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-82932) pertaining to The Town and Country Trust Amended and
Restated 1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-53669) pertaining to the Town and Country Trust 1997 Long Term
Incentive Plan of our report dated January 29, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of The Town and Country Trust incorporated
herein by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2000 and the related financial statement schedule included therein,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-93907) of The Town and Country Trust and in the related
prospectus of our report dated January 29, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of The Town and Country Trust incorporated
herein by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2000 and the related financial statement schedule included therein,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
March 27, 2001
EXHIBIT 10.1(a)

                                  AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                       SITEL CORPORATION STOCK OPTION PLAN
                       FOR REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING OPTIONS
                          (a/k/a the Replacement Plan)

           As adopted by the Board of Directors on September 20, 1996
 
 
 1.  The section of the SITEL Corporation Stock Option Plan for Replacement of
 Existing Options captioned "EFFECT OF CHANGE IN STOCK SUBJECT TO THE PLAN" is
 amended to state in its entirety as follows:

                  EFFECT OF CHANGE IN STOCK SUBJECT TO THE PLAN
                  _____________________________________________

     9.1  CHANGE IN STOCK.  If there is any change in the outstanding shares of
 Stock by reason of a stock dividend or distribution, stock split-up,
 recapitalization, or combination or exchange of shares, or by reason of any
 merger, consolidation, spin-off, or other corporate reorganization in which
 the Company is the surviving corporation, then the number of shares of Stock
 available for issuance under the Plan both in the aggregate and with respect
 to each outstanding Option, and the Option Exercise Price per share under
 outstanding Options, shall be equitably adjusted by the Committee, whose
 determination shall be final, binding, and conclusive.  Unless otherwise
 provided in the applicable option agreement, in the event of (i) a dissolution
 or liquidation of the Corporation, (ii) merger or consolidation of the
 Corporation with another corporation or other entity pursuant to which the
 Corporation is not the surviving entity, (iii) sale or lease of all or
 substantially all the business assets of the Corporation, or (iv) the sale of
 more than 80% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Corporation in a single
 transaction or series of related transactions involving the same acquiring
 entity or person, unless (A) the surviving or acquiring corporation or entity
 or an affiliated corporation or entity assumes the outstanding options (which
 assumption may take the form of replacement of the outstanding options with
 substantially equivalent options from the surviving or acquiring or affiliated
 corporation or entity, and with the determination as to whether the
 outstanding options have been assumed and whether the assumption involved
 "substantially equivalent" options being determined by the Committee within
 its complete discretion) then (B) each outstanding Option shall expire as of
 the effective date of such transaction, provided that the Committee shall give
 at least fifteen (15) days prior written notice of such event to any
 participants having outstanding Options who shall then have the right to
 exercise his or her outstanding Options, in whole or in part, prior to the
 effective date of such transaction, subject to earlier expiration of such
 Options pursuant to the applicable option agreement.
1

APPENDIX A

Proposed Regulation Order

Note: Set forth below is the proposed 2003 amendment to the Off-Highway

Recreational Vehicles (OHRV) and Engines Regulation. The text of the

proposed amendment is shown in underline to indicate additions and strikeout to

indicate deletions, compared to the current regulatory language. Subsections or

parts thereof for which no changes are proposed are indicated by the phrase

“[No changes.]”

Amend Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 9, Article 3, Section 2415, to read as

follows:

§ 2415. California Off-Highway Vehicle Areas and Riding Seasons for OffHighway Recreational Vehicles with Use Restrictions.

(a) The following table lists the public off-highway vehicle (OHV) areas of

California designated for off-highway recreational vehicle operation, including

off-highway motorcycle and ATV operation. Model year 2003 and later offhighway motorcycles and ATVs that are certified pursuant to section 2412(f)

are permitted to operate in the areas noted below only during the applicable

riding seasons noted. Off-highway motorcycles and ATVs that meet the

emissions standards noted in section 2412(b) are not subject to riding season

use restrictions. This table contains the following information: OHV area

managing entities, OHV area names, and the applicable riding seasons.

Table 1

[No changes.]

(b) [No changes.]

(1) [No changes.]

(2) [No changes.]

(c) [No changes.]

NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 43018 and 43107, Health

and Safety Code; and Sections 38020 and 38390, Vehicle Code. Reference:

Sections 43013, 43018 and 43107, Health and Safety Code; and Governor's

Executive Order W144-97.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 189 (Thursday, September 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 60455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25151]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

The White House Council for Community Solutions Gives Notice of 
Their Following Meeting

DATE AND TIME: Friday, October 14, 2011, 9 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Eastern 
Daylight Time.

PLACE: The Council will meet in the Eisenhower Executive Office 
Building. This meeting will be streamed live for public viewing and a 
link will be available on the council's Web site: http://www.serve.gov/communitysolutions.

PUBLIC COMMENT: The public is invited to submit publicly available 
comments through the Council's Web site. To send statements to the 
Council, please send written statements to the Council's electronic 
mailbox at WhiteHouseCouncil@cns.gov. The public can also follow the 
Council's work by visiting its Web site: http://www.serve.gov/communitysolutions.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The purpose of this meeting is to review what 
the Council has learned through its outreach and other efforts about 
the following: (1) Effective cross-sector collaborative initiatives and 
what makes them best practices, and (2) issues facing young Americans 
who are neither in school nor in the workplace and promising solutions 
to address this challenge.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Leslie Boissiere, Executive 
Director, White House Council for Community Solutions, Corporation for 
National and Community Service, 10th Floor, Room 10911, 1201 New York 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone (202) 606-3910. Fax (202) 606-
3464. E-mail: lboissiere@cns.gov.

    Dated: September 26, 2011.
Leslie Boissiere,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-25151 Filed 9-26-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Sylvester JONES, a/k/a Charles Williams.

No. 62112.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition. Parish of Orleans.

Writ Denied: No abuse of the trial court’s factual discretion.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., would grant the writ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-312-006]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

October 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 1, 1997, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to become effective on 
November 1, 1997:

Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 30

    Tennessee states that the above tariff sheet is being filed to 
implement a negotiated rate contract pursuant to the Commission's 
Statement of Policy on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of-service 
Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines and Regulation of Negotiated 
Transportation Services of Natural Gas Pipelines issued January 31, 
1996, at Docket Nos. RM95-6-000 and RM96-7-000.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26913 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000906114
<NAME>                        Johnstown America Industries, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         30,875
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,294
<INVENTORY>                                    58,674
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,601
<PP&E>                                         158,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                 40,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 578,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,662
<BONDS>                                        307,490
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       98
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   578,838
<SALES>                                        642,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               650,347
<CGS>                                          552,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  556,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               39,617
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             35,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                18,985
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,511
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            9,474
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                2,008
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.76
        


</TABLE>
#### The FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Conway E. BOONE, Jr., Respondent.

No. 40905.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 7, 1971.

Patrick A. Podsaid, Coral Gables, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

Conway E. Boone, Jr., in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

Under the procedures authorized by Rule 11.06(11) (a) of the Integration Rule, 32 F.S.A., the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar petitions for the disbarment of respondent, Conway E. Boone, Jr., a member of The Florida Bar.1 On November 5, 1970, the Board directed that charges be filed against respondent relating to six separate counts of conversion of funds held in trust as the result of real property transactions. The total of the sums converted amounted to approximately $55,500.00.

On December 14, 1970, respondent acknowledged service of the complaint filed against him. By way of answer, he plead guilty to all counts alleged in the complaint. On this same day, he voluntarily appeared with counsel at the office of the Assistant Staff Counsel for The Florida Bar in Miami, Florida, and gave testimony reaffirming his prior written plea of guilty. The plea and a transcript of the proceedings before the Assistant Staff Counsel were transmitted to the Board of Governors. On January 14, 1971, the Board voted to petition this Court for respondent’s disbarment.

The instances of conversion complained of, and admitted by respondent, are sufficient to warrant disbarment. No argument has been requested, and no response has been filed by respondent. We now find that Conway E. Boone, Jr., has violated his Oath as an Attorney and Rules 1, 27 and 30 of the Additional Rules Governing the Conduct of Attorneys in Florida (the offenses occurred prior to the effective date of the amendment of Article X; see In re Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 235 So.2d 723 (Fla.1970) at 726).

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this Court that respondent, Conway E. Boone, Jr., be disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Florida.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

1

. Although the record proper is silent as to any plea “tendered before filing of a complaint by bar counsel,” it appears from the transcript submitted with this cause that respondent did indicate that lie would plead guilty to charges before a formal complaint was filed. In the future, we will expect that the tender of plea be made part of the record. If this is not made an express part of the record, it will be difficult for this Court to determine whether Rule 11.06(11) (a) or Rule 11.06(11) (b) should apply.
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 31172 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. DON AL D J OSE PH BAR NE, D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f o rt he Eas t e r n Di s t r i c to f Lo ui s i ana U SD C N o. 2: 06- C R
- 162- 1 B ef ore K IN G , JO L L Y , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * The Fe de r al Publ i c D e fe nde ra ppo i nt e d t o r e pr e s e ntD o nal d J o s e ph Bar ne has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . Ca lif o rn ia , 3 86 U . S . 7 38 (1967). B arn e ha s not f i l ed a respon se. Th e rec ord i s i nsuf f i c i ent l y de vel ope d t o a l l ow c ons i der at i on att hi s t i m e o f any po t ent i al c la im o f in e ffe c tiv e a s s is ta n c e o f c o u n s e l id e n tifie db yco u n s e l; su c h acla im gen eral l y “ can n otbe res olved on d i rectapp ealw h en [i t ] h a s n o t b een rai sed be f o r e t he di s t r i c tc o ur ts i nc e no o ppo r t uni t y e xi s t e d t o de ve l o p t he r e c o r d o n t he United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 31172

2 m erits of t h e a l l eg a ti on s. ” Un itedS ta tes v. Ca n tw ell , 47 0 F . 3 d10 8 7 , 10 9 1 ( 5 th Ci r . 2 00 6) (i nt e r nalq uo t at i o n m ar ks a nd c i t at i on om i t t e d) . O uri nde pe nde nt r e v ie w o f th e re c o r da n dco u n s e l’ s b ri ef disclo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d in g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e t o w i t h d r a w is G R A N T E D , co u n s e l is e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n dt h e A P P EA L I S DI S M I S S ED . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2.