alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-2000
<CASH>                                          27,837
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (14,539)
<INVENTORY>                                    352,243
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               529,839
<PP&E>                                         277,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                (58,680)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 986,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          475,346
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           599
<OTHER-SE>                                     461,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   986,419
<SALES>                                         81,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,233
<CGS>                                           32,962
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,665)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,837)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,837)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)


</TABLE>
### THE 

### STATE

# o~LASKA GOVERNOR SEAN PARNELL

November 7, 2012

N.IT.DerntisJ.DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Essential Air Service at Akutan 

### (7AK) 

### DOCKET DOT-OST-2000-7068 Dear Mr. DeVany, 

## Department ofTransportation and ·. Public Facilities :·; OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER

; -:; C) j: r} -1 P.O. Box 196900 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6900 Main: 907.269.0730

Fax: 907.269.0489

Thank you for the opportunity to comment onthe selection ofan 

## air carrier for Akutan, Alaska. I am writing to express my strong support for the continuation ofthe Essential Air Service (EAS) program 

### in Alaska and to emphasize the crucial access itprovides to our remote communities. Due to the isolated location ofAkutan, which is located in the Aleutian Islands and so lacks any road system connection, EAS subsidized air service is the community's only form ofscheduled transportation. Akutan depends on scheduled air carrier service for freight, passenger, and mail service for basic necessities, access to routine health services, and economic welfare. The State ofAlaska continues to assert thatthe local residents are generally bestpositioned to comment onparticular schedules or air carriers, and therefore we think the community should provide comments to you onthose specific issues. I respectfully urge the US DOTto support and continue EAS service for Akutan, Alaska. Sincerely,

Deputy Commissioner- Aviation

"GetAIaska Moving through service and if!frastructure. "
No. 00-7120.

#### Wilkins *v.*Fries et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### VANGUARD HOMES, INC. v. NEW HOMES PROMOTION, INC. (consolidated with Harold Alley vs. New Homes Promotion Inc.—No. 4331).

No. 4354.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

April 5, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 10, 1971.

Writ Refused June 16, 1971.

Morphy & Freeman, A. D. Freeman, New Orleans, for plaintiff appellant.

Steeg & Shushan, Donald A. Meyer, and Bernhardt C. Heebe, New Orleans for defendant appellee.

Before LEMMON, GULOTTA and STOULIG, JJ.

LEMMON, Judge.

This is a companion case on appeal to Alley v. New Homes Promotion, Inc., 247 So.2d 218 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1971).

The two cases were filed by separate plaintiffs against the same defendant and were tried in two separate divisions of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Although the pertinent facts were substantially the same in both cases, opposite results were reached in the district court judgments.

*222Therefore, for the reasons assigned m Alley v. New Homes Promotion, Inc., supra, decided today, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and New Homes Promotion, Inc. is ordered to refund to Vanguard Homes, Inc. the sum of $8,500.00, together with legal interest thereon from the date of judicial demand until paid. All costs are assessed against defendant-appel-lee.

Reversed and rendered.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.89


                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                               RESEARCH AGREEMENT

      This Amendment No. 1 to the Research Agreement (this "Amendment"),
effective as of March 31, 2002 (the "Effective Date"), is made by and between
Corixa Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Corixa"), and Infectious Disease
Research Institute, a Washington not-for-profit corporation ("IDRI").

                                    RECITALS

      WHEREAS, the Parties hereto have entered into that certain Research
Agreement, effective as of March 26, 1999, (the "Agreement"); and

      WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the Research Program Term and update
certain provisions in the Agreement;

      NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as
follows:

1.    Unless defined otherwise herein, capitalized terms used in this Amendment
shall have the meanings given them in the Agreement.

2.    The Research Program Term shall be extended through March 31, 2003.

3.    Section 3 shall be amended and replaced in its entirety with the
      following:

            The parties hereby create a Research Oversight Committee (the
      "Research Oversight Committee") which shall consist of four (4) members,
      two (2) appointed by Corixa and two (2) appointed by IDRI. Corixa's
      initial members of the Research Oversight Committee shall be Martin
      Cheever and Kenneth Grabstein. IDRI's initial members of the Research
      Oversight Committee shall be David Webster and Patricia Wahl. Each party
      may at any time upon written notice replace one or both of its appointees
      with members reasonably acceptable to the other party. The Research
      Oversight Committee shall meet on an ad hoc basis, as agreed upon by the
      Research Oversight Committee members, during the Research Program Term to
      review the progress of the Research Program and the use of the Research
      Funds. Within thirty (30) days following each meeting, the members of the
      Research Committee shall distribute to each party minutes detailing the
      matters reviewed at such meeting.

4.    Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue in full force and
effect in accordance with its terms.

5.    This Amendment shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the
State of Washington without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of
laws.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed as of the date first written above.

         CORIXA CORPORATION                    INFECTIOUS DISEASE RESEARCH
                                               INSTITUTE

         /s/ STEVEN GILLIS                     /s/ DAVID WEBSTER
         ------------------------------        ------------------------------
         Steven Gillis, Ph.D.                  David Webster
         Chairman and CEO                      President


                                   Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28207]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Giant Multi-Resource Management Project

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Revised Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest, has changed 
the proposed action for this EIS. The new proposal includes only timber 
harvest, road construction, road decommissioning, and fuel treatment. 
The design of the new proposal incorporates and addresses all issues 
previously identified. The Forest Service now anticipates issuing a 
Draft EIS in the last quarter of Calendar Year 1997, and filing a Final 
EIS in the first quarter of Calendar Year 1998.

DATE: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received 
by November 15, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to John Bradford, EIS Team Leader, 
Foresthill Ranger District, 22830 Foresthill Road, Foresthill, CA 
95631.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Bradford, EIS Team Leader, 
Foresthill Ranger District, 916-478-6254.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 2, 1997 a Notice of Intent to 
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement was published in the Federal 
Register (Vol. 62, No. 105, Pages 29706-29707).

    Dated: October 16, 1997.
John H. Skinner,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 97-28207 Filed 10-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3419 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 325
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3419

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1765 Camp Hill Bypass in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, as the ``John 
                      Charles Traub Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 2023

  Mr. Fetterman (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                            February 6, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1765 Camp Hill Bypass in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, as the ``John 
                      Charles Traub Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN CHARLES TRAUB POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1765 Camp Hill Bypass in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``John Charles Traub Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John 
Charles Traub Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 325

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3419

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1765 Camp Hill Bypass in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, as the ``John 
                      Charles Traub Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 6, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Written Statementof the Chief Financial Officer**

I,Jason A. Jenne, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TrueTemper Sports, Inc. (the “Company”), state and certify that this Form 10-QQuarterly Report for the period ended April 2, 2006, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Form 10-QQuarterly Report for the period ended April 2, 2006, fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

| /s/ JASON  A. JENNE                           |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jason A. Jenne                                |   |
| *Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and* |   |
| *Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)*     |   |
| May 17, 2006                             |   |

 

----
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

19–011 2012

112th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 112–94 

NOTIFICATION OF INTENTION TO SUSPEND DESIGNATION OF ARGENTINA AS A BENEFICIARY DEVELOPING COUNTRY UNDER THE GENERALIZED 

SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES (GSP) PROGRAM 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTIFICATION OF THE INTENTION TO TERMINATE THE DESIGNATION OF ARGENTINA AS A BENEFICIARY DEVELOPING COUNTRY 

UNDER THE GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES (GSP) 

MARCH 26, 2012.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

In accordance with section 502(f)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974, as 

amended (the ‘‘1974 Act’’) (19 U.S.C. 2462(f)(2)), I am providing notification of my intent to suspend designation of Argentina as a 

beneficiary developing country under the Generalized System of 

Preferences (GSP) program. Section 502(b)(2)(E) of the 1974 Act (19 

U.S.C. 2462(b)(2)(E)) provides that the President shall not designate any country a beneficiary developing country under the GSP 

if such country fails to act in good faith in enforcing arbitral 

awards in favor of U.S.-owned companies. Section 502(d)(2) of the 

1974 Act (19 U.S.C. 2462(d)(2)) provides that, after complying with 

the requirements of section 502(f)(2) of the 1974 Act (19 U.S.C. 

2462(f)(2)), the President shall withdraw or suspend the designation of any country as a beneficiary developing country if, after 

such designation, the President determines that as the result of 

changed circumstances such country would be barred from designation as a beneficiary developing country under section 502(b)(2) of 

the 1974 Act. 

Pursuant to section 502(d) of the 1974 Act, having considered the 

factors set forth in section 502(b)(2)(E), I have determined that it 

is appropriate to suspend Argentina’s designation as a beneficiary 

country under the GSP program because it has not acted in good 

faith in enforcing arbitral awards in favor of U.S.-owned companies. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, March 26, 2012. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **2015 -**  **0669** Docket Number

**2013 -**  **SW -**  **038 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM Eurocop ter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) MBB - BK117 - 60A- 126 or ASB MBB - BK117 C - 2 - 76A - 005, both Revision 0 , and both dated June 24, 2013.



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacha m Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

CRAIG ALLEN RODGERS, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE 

SUSAN JOHNSON, DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Real Party in Interest. 

No. 84718 

FILED 

JUN 1 7 2022 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

BY 

CLEZ UPREME COURT 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus 

seeking to direct the district court to compel petitioner's former counsel and 

the district attorney's office to produce and transmit his entire case file. 

This court has original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus, 

and the issuance of such extraordinary relief is within this court's sole 

discretion. See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 4; D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial 

Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 468, 474-75, 168 P.3d 731, 736-37 (2007). Petitioner 

bears the burden to show that extraordinary relief is warranted, and such 

relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy 

at law. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 

P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004). 

Although petitioner references rulings by the district court, he 

has not provided this court with either copies of his motions filed below, 

district court orders granting his motions, or any of the documents 

necessary for this court's consideration of the petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4) 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

40) 1.447A aftalica 
(providing that petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all 

documents "essential to understand[ing] the matters set forth in the 

petition"). Therefore, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this 

matter. See NRAP 21(b). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

fr?ii6.11.41,1...SViairmalmix!C.J. 

/A,,,.......&t.t. J. 

Hardesty 

Alieutyli...0 J. 

Stiglich 

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge 

Craig Allen Rodgers 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Parraguirre 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

IN I 947A egaND 2
|                         | **Gaffney,      Cline &      Associates**      Gaffney, Cline & Associates, Inc.      1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 1000      Houston, TX 77056      Telephone: +1 713 850 9955www.gaffney-cline.com |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| DKM/gjh/C1900.01/gcah.170.12 | May        14, 2012                                                                                                                                                                                       |

YPF S.A.Macacha Guemes 515    C1106BKK Buenos Aires   Argentina

**Consent  of Independent Petroleum Engineers**

Gentlemen:

     We  hereby consent to the references to Gaffney, Cline & Associates Inc. and  the inclusion of our third party report dated February 17, 2012 and the information  included therein in sections “Information on the Company–Exploration  and Production”and “Exhibits” in YPF S.A.'s report on Form 20-F  for the year ended December 31, 2011 to be filed with the United States Securities  and Exchange Commission, and the incorporation by reference of the same information  in Form F-3 documents that have been filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission by YPF S.A. 

     Gaffney,  Cline & Associates Inc. audited certain areas in Argentina in which YPF  has interests. These external audits were performed with an as of date of September  30, 2011. 

Yours  Sincerely, 

**GAFFNEY,  CLINE & ASSOCIATES, INC.**

**/s/  David K. Morgan**

     David  K. Morgan   Principal – Reservoir Engineering
Gormas, Michael (OST) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Dear MrSchlemmer David Berg <David@VikingTrvl.net> Friday, December 05, 2014 5:39 PM EAS (OST) tim.thompson@alaskaair.com Letter of support, EAS -Alaska Airlines - Docket OST=1998-4899

We'd like to express our support forthe selection ofAlaska Airlines to continue to provide essential air service to Petersburg and the other communities in the program. As you may know, AlaskaAir's service connects SoutheastAlaska passengers to each other and to the outside world. Lots ofAlaskans travel, and the service thatAlaska provides is important to our health and welfare, notto mention providing cargo capacity that's importantto our commerce. Just recently, our only radio station, KFSK-FM, a member ofthe NPR Network, suffered a catastrophic transmitterfailure. Alaska Airlines provided passenger and freight service to getthe station back up and running. Further, Alaska Airlines has invested heavily in providing heads-up displayfor their pilots and groundbased GPS to enable the airline to reliably access the airport during inclementweather, thus reducing diversions and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach the community. Alaska Airlines' service is critical to the economic well being of Petersburg and we support their application to continue to provide Essential Air Service to SoutheastAlaska. Sincerely, David Berg, President Viking Travel, Inc. I www.AiaskaFerrvVacations.com Box 787 101 N Nordic Drive Petersburg AK 99833-0787

..,.,:,:..· 907-772-3818 907-772-3940- Fax mailto:David@AiaskaFerrv.com

1 !
.../,,,;i t··,,'i

1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Cygne Designs, Inc. (the  Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending January 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bernard M. Manuel, Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes
-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Bernard M. ManuelBernard M. ManuelChairman of the BoardMay 23, 2008
#### Edward James WHALEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. EE-212.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 8, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1977.

*1231Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Following affirmance of his conviction by this court, *Whalen v. State,*335 So.2d 631 (Fla.1st DCA 1976), Whalen filed in the trial court a motion to vacate the judgment and sentence on grounds including the alleged incompetence of his trial counsel. That motion and the files and records of the ease did not conclusively show Whalen not entitled to relief. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. The trial court accordingly held a hearing. While the trial court’s order denying relief from the judgment and sentence was deficient in its failure to “make findings of fact and conclusions of law” concerning the alleged incompetency of Whalen’s trial counsel, no evidence was offered in support of Whalen’s contention and none is alluded to here except that which appears from our earlier opinion. The admitted lapses by Whalen’s trial counsel were not so egregious as to deny Whalen constitutional guaranties. *McCrae v. State,*313 So.2d 429 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); *Potts v. State,*242 So.2d 729 (Fla.2d DCA 1971).

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.