alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Samuel Rubinstein, as Senior Vice President and General Manager and of
Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge: (1) the accompanying Form 20-F report for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. By: /s/ Samuel RubinsteinSamuel RubinsteinDate: May 28, 2004
    Senior Vice President & General Manager 103
577.02594
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,054
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 367,342
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,083,327
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 367,342
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                588,555
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (587,046)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (587,046)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (587,046)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brad W. Rudover, President director of The Electric Network.com, Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Electric Network.com, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2004

/s/ Brad W. Rudover				Brad W. Rudover
President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In conjunction with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Fuel Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
 
 I, Stuart D. Beath, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:  August 14, 2009

By.
/s/ Stuart D. BeathName:
Stuart D. BeathTitle:
Chief Financial Officer
#### In re FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES.

No. 37079.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 1, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

(Order amending Rule 4.2(a) 32 F.S.A.)

Rule 4.2(a), Florida Appellate Rules [211 So.2d 198, 199 (Fla 1968)] is amended to read as follows, viz.:

> “Appeals may be prosecuted in accordance with this rule from interlocutory orders in civil actions that, from the subject matter or relief sought, are such as formerly were cognizable in equity, *139from interlocutory orders relating to venue or jurisdiction over the person, from orders granting partial summary judgment on liability in civil actions, from decisions, orders or judgments entered in civil actions after final judgment except those relating to motions for new trial, rehearing or reconsideration, from orders granting or denying motions to vacate defaults and from orders granting or denying dismissal for lack of prosecution. Nothing in this rule shall preclude the review of an interlocutory order in a civil action on appeal from the final judgment as otherwise authorized by these rules. This rule shall not be construed as limiting or affecting the power of the district courts of appeal or the circuit courts in reviewing any appropriate interlocutory order by common law certiorari.”

This Order shall become effective Midnight, September 30, 1970.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Michael David HALL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44243.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 23, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
@ December 15, 2006 400 Seventh St., S.W.

US.Department Washington, D.C. 20590
of Transportation

Federal Highway In Reply Refer To:
Administration HSA-10/LS-62

Mr. Robert Sik

Vice President

Akron Foundry Company
2728 Wingate Avenue
P.O. Box 27028

Akron, OH 44319-0009

Dear Mr. Sik:

Thank you for your letter dated October 12 requesting the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) acceptance of a modification to your company’s CS-300 breakaway cast aluminum
transformer base for use on the National Highway System under the provisions of the National
Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 350 “Recommended Procedures for the Safety
Performance Evaluation of Highway Features.”

You requested that we find the CS-300 base acceptable when used on a 10- inch diameter bolt
circle. With the exception of the intemal ear length used to bolt the base in place, the typical base
assembly is identical to your previously accepted CS-300 transformer base. Attachment to the base
at the internal ears using standard round washers that lay flat or attachment using the previously
accepted modified stack pack washer arrangement (LS-58) will provide full support when bolted in
place.

We have reviewed the results of prior crash testing of the CS-300 base, which had been found
acceptable when used with standard round washers on a bolt circle of 12 inches, and concur that
this modification would have no significant impact on the breakaway performance of your
company’s transformer base. All appropriate conditions in the previous FHWA acceptance letters
dealing with Akron Foundry cast aluminum transformer bases continue to apply.

Sincerely yours,

R. C6eb6
irector, Office ry Safety Design
Office of Safety
one bo, ,
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




I,
David Koos, Chief Executive Officer of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc.
(“Registrant”) certify that:




1. I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Registrant;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. 
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and
have:





(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






Date:
      August 20, 2009
                By:
                /s/ David
      R. KoosDavid
      R. KoosPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the annual report of Cygne Designs, Inc. (the  Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending January 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roy E.
Green, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Roy E. GreenRoy E. GreenSenior Vice President-Chief Financial OfficerMay 24, 2005
#### Claude L. KELLY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 51832.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 15, 1977.

Claude L. Kelly, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Patti Englander, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari was denied.

We have considered the petition for cer-tiorari as an application for writ of habeas corpus. It states no basis for granting relief by habeas corpus, hence such application is also denied.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, Acting C. J., ENGLAND, SUND-BERG and HATCHETT, JJ., and DREW (Retired), J., concur.
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 9, 2009 |                        |   |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        | /s/ DAVID ROBERTSON    |   |
|                        | David      Robertson        |
|                        | Chief      FinancialOfficer |
# L_2005065EN.01002001.xml

| 11.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 65/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 65/20

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 405/2005

of 10 March 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004 of 3 September 2004 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden for the 2004/2005 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 4 to 10 March 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 10 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 3.

3

---
259 La. 79

#### Succession of Marshall Henry COILE.

No. 51548.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1971.

In re: Vernon James Coile applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 247 So.2d 668.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in its judgment.
#### S. A. COX v. Pattie O. COX, Executrix of Estate of S. L. Cox.

No. 49751.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 7, 1977.

Jacobs, Griffith & Povall, Benjamin E. Griffith, Cleveland, for appellant.

Laurence Y. Mellen, Cleveland, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Bolivar County; William H. Bizzell, Chancellor.

Before SMITH, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### Michael Anthony CHRISTY, an individual, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Respondent.

No. 39577.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 18, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed. 232 So.2d 744.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



In connection with the Annual Report of Rural/Metro Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael S. Zarriello, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 27, 2004                                     
|                                                              
|/s/ Michael S. Zarriello                                      
|Michael S. Zarriello                                          
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer             
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3597 

To reauthorize programs relating to oral health promotion and disease 

prevention. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2024 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. MARSHALL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To reauthorize programs relating to oral health promotion 

and disease prevention. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Dental 

5 Health Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS. 

7 Section 317M of the Public Health Service Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 247b–14) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3597 IS

1 (1) in subsection (d)(2), by striking ‘‘2010 

2 through 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2024 through 2028’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘2001 through 

5 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘2024 through 2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00386

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.T.

, a Child

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- PA

- 01687

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s termination order is

AFFIRMED.

We order that no costs be assessed against appellant Mother because she is indigent.

SIGNED No vember 1, 2017.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
3!’

ii!

i

f

tB20“”t.g

/1 I

,,

,_

 “.

 ,_

““.

 .”

 ,.

.(

 .“