alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-198-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Request 
Under Blanket Authorization

January 30, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 17, 1997, as supplemented on January 
28, 1997, Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company (Williston 
Basin), 200 North Third Street, Bismarck, North Dakota 58501, filed in 
Docket No. CP97-198-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.205, 157.211) for authorization to construct and operate 
delivery facilities in South Dakota under Williston Basin's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-487-000, et al., pursuant to 
Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the 
request that is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Williston Basin proposes to construct an additional one-inch tap at 
an existing tap site to effectuate natural gas transportation 
deliveries to Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. (Montana-Dakota) for 
ultimate use by additional residential customers. Williston Basin 
states that the existing tap and the additional one-inch tap will be 
manifolded together and used to serve Montana-Dakota, for ultimate use 
by the residents of the Mountain Shadow Estates mobile home park. 
Williston Basin estimates the current maximum daily quantity at the 
existing tap to be 200 Mcf per day. Williston Basin further estimates 
that after the additional one-inch tap is installed, the maximum daily 
delivery quantity will be 1,100 Mcf per day. Williston Basin states 
that the volumes to be delivered are within the contractual 
entitlements of the customer. In addition, Williston Basin estimates 
the cost of construction to be $1,000, of which will be fully 
reimbursed by Montana-Dakota.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2775 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
San Joaquin Valley 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

90 9, 

HEALTHY AIR LIVING" 

December 26, 2012 

Mr. James Goldstene 

Executive Officer 

California Air Resources Board 

1001 "1" Street 

P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 95812 

Dear Mr. James Goldstene: 

Enclosed is the State Implementation Plan (SIP) Package for the San Joaquin Valley 

Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) 2012 PM2.5 Plan. The District Governing 

Board adopted the 2012 PM2.5 Plan at a public hearing held on December 20, 2012. 

We request that the California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit this plan and the 

appropriate documentation to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

as a SIP revision. 

Included in this SIP Package are the following attachments: 

1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 

2. The 2012 PM2.5 Plan with Appendices 

3. Evidence of Public Hearing 

4. Governing Board Resolution Adopting the 2012 PM2.5 Plan 

5. Governing Board Memo 

6. CEQA Initial Study and Negative Declaration 

If you have any questions regarding this plan, please contact Jessica Fierro by e-mail at 

Jessica.Fierro a(D.valleyair.orgor at (559) 230-5800. The District thanks you and your 

staff for your assistance. 

Since ely, 

Sheikh 

Director of Strategies and Incentives 

Attachments 

cc: S. Vanderspek
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Mark Scott, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. As the registrant's certifying officer I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2006                      /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
#### LINDER INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY CO., Appellant, v. LE-BERT INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellee.

No. 76-2150.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 6, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 1978.

Hall & Hedrick and John F. Cosgrove, Miami, for appellant.

Bryson & Berman, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ., and PARKER, J. GWYNN (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Griffith*v. *Shamrock Village, Inc.,*94 So.2d 854, 858 (Fla.1957); *Underwriters National Assurance Co. v. Harrison,*338 So.2d 58, 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Roger Holler Chevrolet Co. v. Arvey,*314 So.2d 633 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *Ashland Oil, Inc., v. Pickard,*269 So.2d 714, 720 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); *Fred S. Conrad Construction Co. v. Exchange Bank of St. Augustine,*178 So.2d 217, 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965); *Crews v. Warren,*157 So.2d 553, 555-556, 561 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963).
#### Gurth G. WEST, Robert Grossman and Carolyn Grossman, Appellants, v. Frank D. TOLIN and Beatrice Tolin, Appellees.

No. 69-983.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 19, 1970.

Milton E. Grusmark, Miami Beach, and Natalie Baskin, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for appel-lees.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in an action for fraud and misrepresentation appeal a summary final judgment for the defendants. The pleadings, depositions and affidavits show that there is no genuine issue of any material fact. The appellees were entitled to a summary judgment as a matter of law because it was conclusively made to appear that the representation made was not fraudulent within the legal definition of *325that term. See Biscayne Boulevard Properties v. Graham, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 858; Finney v. Frost, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 617.

Affirmed.
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

June 21, 2011

In Reply Refer To:

HSST/WZ-304

Mr. Greg Hannah, President

Impact Recovery Systems

4955 Stout Drive

San Antonio, TX 78219

Dear Mr. Hannah:

This is in response to your February 7, letter requesting the Federal Highway Administration’s 

(FHWA) acceptance of your company’s Tuff Curb® XLP traffic channelizer as a crashworthy 

traffic control device for use in work zones and elsewhere on the National Highway System 

(NHS). Accompanying your letter was the FHWA Office of Safety Design form indicating

successful performance when tested under the American Association of Safety Highway 

Transportation Officials Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware.

Tuff Curb® XLP is a longitudinal channelizing curb system produced by Impact Recovery 

Systems, Inc. Tuff Curb® XLP consists of two pieces. One is a single piece curb section 

measuring 40”L x 8”W x 2”H made of High Density Polyethylene and weighing approximately 

seven (7) pounds. It is attached to the roadway by way of lag bolts through three (3) anchor 

holes within the curb. The second piece is a coupler which bridges between curb sections, 

measuring 10”L x 8”W x 1.75”H also made of High Density Polyethylene and weighing 

approximately 2 pounds. It is attached to the roadway by way of two anchor holes which are 

co-aligned with adjoining curb sections and anchors by way of the same lag bolt. The Tuff 

Curb® XLP was subjected to a total of 8 impact tests as note in the enclosures.

This letter is the acknowledgement of the FHWA’s acceptance of your request. The original 

completed form has been modified by the addition of the FHWA acceptance letter number and 

the date of our review. The form, of which a copy is enclosed for reference, will be posted on 

our Web site in the near future.

Sincerely yours,

Michael S. Griffith

Director, Office of Safety Technologies 

Office of Safety

Enclosures
#### VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. George ROWLEY, as Assignee of John Tottenhoff, Appellee.

No. 70-1148.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 2, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### William Ernest BYRD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-354.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Nov. 18, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Fred B. DALZELL, Managing Owner of THE Steamtug JOHN J. TIMMINS, Libelant-Appellant, v. THE Steamtug NIAGARA, Her Engines, etc., New York Dock Railway, Claimant-Appellee.

No. 213.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 1, 1937.

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and Eugene Underwood, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Macklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, of New York City (Leo F. Hanan, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27908]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-16-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

October 16, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 9, 1997, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston, West 
Virginia 25314-1599, filed in Docket No. CP98-16-000, a request 
pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.216 of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.216) for 
authorization to abandon by retirement approximately 15.6 miles of 6- 
and 8-inch pipeline located in McKean County, Pennsylvania, under its 
blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-76-000, pursuant to 
Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the 
request which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Columbia proposes to abandon its lateral transmission Line 10262 in 
its entirety (15.6 miles) in McKean County, Pennsylvania. Columbia 
explains the pipeline is in a deteriorating condition and the 
abandonment will avoid annual operation and maintenance expenses as 
well as the cost of pipeline replacement. Columbia states that it has 
no points of delivery from Line 10262. Columbia relates that its 8-inch 
Line 4226 shares a right-of-way with Line 10262, and therefore, 
Columbia asserts it will be able to continue to provide reliable 
service in that area.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27908 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 
Secs. 9601 to 9675

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United 
States v. Four Winns, a division of Recreational Boat Group, L.P., 
Civil Action No. 1:97cv831, was lodged on October 6, 1997 with the 
United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. The 
proposed consent decree resolves the United States' claims against the 
defendant for past costs incurred in connection with the Kysor 
Industrial Corporation Superfund Site and the Northernaire Plating 
Company Superfund Site located in Cadillac, Michigan, in return for a 
total payment of $150,000.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Decision, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Four Winns, a division of Recreational Boat Group, 
L.P., DOJ Ref. #90-11-2-837C.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 330 Ionia Avenue NW, Suite 501, Grand Rapids, 
Michigan 49503; the Region 5 Office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604; and at the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent decree may 
be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy 
please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount 
of $5.75 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent 
Decree Library.
Bruce S. Gelber,
Principal Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-28315 Filed 10-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2996 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2996

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to extend and 
 enhance the Rural Microentrepreneur Assistance Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 29 (legislative day, September 22), 2023

Mr. Ricketts (for himself and Ms. Smith) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to extend and 
 enhance the Rural Microentrepreneur Assistance Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Microentrepreneur Assistance 
Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN FUNDING FOR THE RURAL MICROENTREPRENEUR ASSISTANCE 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 379E of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 
U.S.C. 2008s) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(4), by striking ``$50,000'' and 
        inserting ``$75,000'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(3), by adding at the end the 
        following:
                    ``(E) Use of funds.--A microloan made by a 
                microenterprise development organization to a 
                microentrepreneur under this paragraph for a project 
                may be used to cover not more than 50 percent of any 
                demolition, construction, or related costs of real 
                estate improvements under the project.'';
            (3) in subsection (c)(1)(A), by striking ``75 percent'' and 
        inserting ``100 percent''; and
            (4) in subsection (d), by striking ``2019 through 2023'' 
        and inserting ``2024 through 2028''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 55512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28300]



[[Page 55512]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service

19 CFR Parts 4, 10, 11, 12, 18, 24, 103, 112, 122, 127, 133, 141, 
143, 148, 151, 152, 159, 171, 177 and 191

[T.D. 97-82]


Technical Amendments to the Customs Regulations

AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to the document published in 
the Federal Register which set forth various minor technical changes 
and corrections to the Customs Regulations. The correction involves the 
wording of the regulatory text contained in the amendatory instruction 
pertaining to Sec. 11.9.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This correction is effective October 3, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harold Singer, Regulations Branch, 
Office of Regulations and Rulings (202-927-2340).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 3, 1997, Customs published in the Federal Register (62 
FR 51766) as T.D. 97-82 a final rule document setting forth various 
minor technical changes and corrections to the Customs Regulations. The 
regulatory amendments included a change to paragraph (b) of Sec. 11.9 
(19 CFR 11.9). Although the Background portion of T.D. 97-82 correctly 
included the word ``purchaser'' in identifying the affected regulatory 
text, the amendatory instruction set forth later in the document 
inadvertently included the word ``producer'' as part of the amended 
regulatory text. This document sets forth a new amendatory instruction 
pertaining to Sec. 11.9 to correct this error.

Correction to the Final Regulations

    On page 51770, in the first column, the amendatory instruction for 
Sec. 11.9 is corrected to read as follows:
    2. In Sec. 11.9, the first sentence of paragraph (b) is amended by 
removing the words ``manufacturer or purchaser of'' and adding, in 
their place, the words ``manufacturer or purchaser or''.

    Dated: October 20, 1997.
Harold M. Singer,
Chief, Regulations Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-28300 Filed 10-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
259 La. 67

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Isaac GRAY v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51524.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 24, 1971.

In re: Isaac Gray applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application granted.

An evidentiary hearing is ordered to be conducted. See order.

On considering the petition of relator in the above numbered and entitled cause:

It is ordered that the Honorable Rudolph F. Becker, Jr., Judge of the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, without delay, grant an evidentiary hearing on relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in that Court and in this Court, limited to the allegation of denial of his right to appeal and the ineffectiveness of counsel insofar as it relates to his allegation of denial of his right to appeal, and make a determination of the merits of his application after the hearing.
259 La. 73

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Herbert Alvin WOMACK, Jr. v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51535.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 24, 1971.

In re: Herbert Alvin Womack, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writs refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.