alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert S. TERRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-545.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 18, 1973.

Robert S. Terry, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of *21the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo20818 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### John Vincent ROARK, Jr., a minor, by and through his mother and next friend, Elizabeth J. Mohl, and Elizabeth J. Mohl, individually, Appellants, v. James Harold TER KEURST, a minor, by and through his brother and next friend, William Ter Keurst, and William Ter Keurst, individually, Appellees.

No. 71-9.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 1, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3356 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to modify the role and duties of 

United States Postal Service police officers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2023 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. MORAN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. 

BROWN, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. 

COONS, Mr. KAINE, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. SINEMA, and Mr. KING) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to modify the role 

and duties of United States Postal Service police officers, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Postal Police Reform 

5 Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ROLE AND DUTIES OF USPS POLICE OFFICERS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3061(c) of title 18, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3356 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘(c)(1)’’ and all that follows 

2 through the end of paragraph (1) and inserting the 

3 following: 

4 ‘‘(c)(1)(A) The Postal Service may employ police offi5 cers for duty in connection with the protection of— 

6 ‘‘(i) the mail; 

7 ‘‘(ii) property owned or occupied by the Postal 

8 Service or under the charge and control of the Post9 al Service; 

10 ‘‘(iii) persons on the property described in 

11 clause (ii); and 

12 ‘‘(iv) on-duty employees of the Postal Service in 

13 any location in the United States. 

14 ‘‘(B) The duty described in subparagraph (A) may 

15 occur in areas outside the property owned or occupied by 

16 the Postal Service to the extent necessary to effect the 

17 protection described in that subparagraph.’’; 

18 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘With respect 

19 to such property, such officers’’ and inserting ‘‘Any 

20 officer assigned to provide the protection described 

21 in paragraph (1)(A)’’; and 

22 (3) in paragraph (3)— 

23 (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph 

24 (A), by striking ‘‘such property’’ and inserting 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3356 IS

1 ‘‘the protection described in paragraph (1)(A)’’; 

2 and 

3 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

4 ‘‘committed against’’ and all that follows and 

5 inserting the following: ‘‘committed against— 

6 ‘‘(i) property owned or occupied by 

7 the Postal Service or under the charge and 

8 control of the Postal Service; 

9 ‘‘(ii) persons on the property de10 scribed in clause (i); or 

11 ‘‘(iii) on-duty employees of the Postal 

12 Service in any location in the United 

13 States.’’. 

14 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 

15 3061(c)(2)(C) of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

16 by striking ‘‘Unites States’’ and inserting ‘‘United 

17 States’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Thomas G. FOXX, Appellant, v. Frances G. FOXX, Appellee.

No. HH-159.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 14, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 15, 1978.

John Peter Kirtz, Jr., Pensacola, for appellant.

Richard H. Merritt and Thomas E. Johnson of Merritt & Johnson, Pensacola, for appellee.

MILLS, Judge.

Mr. Foxx appeals from a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage action contending the trial court erred in awarding Mrs. Foxx the home and the household furnishings of the parties as partial lump sum alimony. We agree and reverse.

Mrs. Foxx did not allege a claim for lump sum alimony in her petition or the amendments thereto. There being no claim for lump sum alimony, the court had no authority to award Mrs. Foxx lump sum alimony.

*755The judgment recites that the parties agreed in their testimony that Mrs. Foxx be awarded the household furnishings. This is incorrect and is unsupported by the record. In fact, the record furnished us clearly shows that no such agreement was made by the parties.

The record reflects that the parties have no children, they are both healthy, employed and occupy similar financial positions except Mrs. Foxx earns slightly more weekly than Mr. Foxx. Under these circumstances, the record does not support an award of lump sum alimony. *Cummings v. Cummings,*330 So.2d 134 (Fla.1976).

We reverse that part of the final judgment awarding Mrs. Foxx the home and the household furnishings and remand this case to the trial court for the entry of a judgment consistent with the views expressed above.

BOYER, Acting C. J., concurs.

BOOTH, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.2
                    CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Nutritional Sourcing
 Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
 October 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
 the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel J. O'Leary, Chief Financial
 Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
 the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
 Company.


 Dated:  December 23, 2004


                                                /s/ Daniel J. O'Leary
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Daniel J. O'Leary
                                                Chief Financial Officer


 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed
 as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

















<PAGE> 2

- 2 -
Exhibit 23.1
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 Board of Directors and Shareholders
 Merge Healthcare Incorporated
 Chicago, Illinois
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-125603, 333-161689 and 333-161691) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-34884, 333-100104, 333-107997, 333-40882, 333-107991 and 333-125386) of Merge Healthcare Incorporated of our reports dated March 15, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of Merge Healthcare Incorporated’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.
 
 /s/ BDO USA, LLPMilwaukee, WisconsinMarch 15, 2011
FHWA-SA-21-047

Walkways

A walkway is any type of defined space or pathway for use by a person 

traveling by foot or using a wheelchair. These may be pedestrian walkways, 

shared use paths, sidewalks, or roadway shoulders. 

With more than 6,200 pedestrian 

fatalities and 75,000 pedestrian 

injuries occurring in roadway 

crashes annually,1 it is important for 

transportation agencies to improve 

conditions and safety for pedestrians 

and to integrate walkways more 

fully into the transportation system. 

Research shows people living in lowincome communities are less likely 

to encounter walkways and other 

pedestrian-friendly features.2

Well-designed pedestrian walkways, 

shared use paths, and sidewalks 

improve the safety and mobility of 

pedestrians. Pedestrians should have 

direct and connected network of 

walking routes to desired destinations 

without gaps or abrupt changes. In 

some rural or suburban areas, where 

these types of walkways are not 

feasible, roadway shoulders provide 

an area for pedestrians to walk next 

to the roadway, although these are 

not preferable.

Transportation agencies should work 

towards incorporating pedestrian 

facilities into all roadway projects 

unless exceptional circumstances 

exist. It is important to provide and 

maintain accessible walkways along 

both sides of the road in urban areas, 

particularly near school zones and 

transit locations, and where there is a 

large amount of pedestrian activity. 

Walkable shoulders should also be 

considered along both sides of rural 

highways when routinely used by 

pedestrians.

Example of a sidewalk in a residential area. 

Source: pedbikeimages.org / Burden 

 Paved shoulder used as a walkway. Source: pedbikeimages.org / Burden 

Safety Benefits:

Sidewalks

reduction in crashes involving 

pedestrians walking along 

roadways.3

65-89%

Paved Shoulders

reduction in crashes involving 

pedestrians walking along 

roadways.3

71%

1 National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2020, March). Pedestrians: 

2018 data (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 850). National 

Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

2 Gibbs, et all. Income Disparities in Street Features that Encourage Walking. 

Bridging the Gap, (2012, March).

3 Gan et al. Update of Florida Crash Reduction Factors and Countermeasures 

to Improve the Development of District Safety Improvement Projects. Florida DOT, (2005).

OFFICE OF SAFETY

Proven Safety 

Countermeasures

For more information on this 

and other FHWA Proven Safety 

Countermeasures, please visit 

https://highways.dot.gov/

safety/proven-safety-counter 

measures and http://www.

pedbikesafe.org/PEDSAFE/

countermeasures_detail.

cfm?CM_NUM=1.
#### JACKSONVILLE ELECTRIC AUTHORITY, Appellant, v. The BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DUVAL COUNTY, Appellee.

No. L-292.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 17, 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 22, 1970.

William L. Durden, David U. Tumin and William Lee Allen, Jacksonville, for appellant.

*411Madsen & Briggs, Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in an action for damages for charging illegal and discriminatory electric rates has appealed from a final judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Duval County, based upon a jury verdict.

The basic question presented for our determination in this appeal is whether there was sufficient competent evidence adduced at the trial to support the said verdict and judgment.

The plaintiff, the board of public instruction of the county in which the City of Jacksonville is located, alleges in its complaint that the defendant operates the electric system in Jacksonville and the surrounding areas, and the plaintiff purchases electricity from the defendant for use at the plaintiff’s school buildings; that the plaintiff was entitled to be charged a certain rate for electricity furnished to its schools, but the defendant had charged the plaintiff at incorrect higher rates; that the latter rates, selected by the defendant, were discriminatory and excessive in comparison to the rates to which the plaintiff was entitled, resulting in an overcharge to plaintiff.

Trial was held before a jury, which returned a verdict awarding to the plaintiff damages in the amount of $335,864.98. The defendant’s motions for a directed verdict and for a judgment in accordance with its motion for directed verdict or new trial, were denied by the trial court.

 It would serve no useful purpose to detail here the evidence set forth in the 375 pages of the trial transcript, but suffice it to say that we have examined the said transcript and find therein sufficient competent and substantial evidence from which the jury could have reasonably concluded that the plaintiff had proved the allegations of its complaint and was entitled to the award in the said verdict. Under these circumstances, neither the trial court nor this court is authorized to substitute its judgment for that of the jury as to such questions of fact.

We have considered the other points raised by the defendant in this appeal, and find them to be without substantial merit.

Therefore, the final judgment appealed from herein must be and it is

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
# L_2005269EN.01002301.xml

| 14.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 269/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 269/23

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

of 7 September 2005

on the mobilisation of the flexibility instrument in favour of the rehabilitation and reconstruction assistance to tsunami affected countries according to point 24 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999

(2005/707/EC)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure (1), and in particular point 24 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

The Budget Authority has agreed to support the rehabilitation and reconstruction needs in the earthquake/tsunami affected countries (mainly Indonesia, Sri Lanka and the Maldives) for a total amount of EUR 350 million, of which EUR 170 million in 2005; part of the required response will be delivered by redefining indicative and not yet committed programmes for the region in agreement with the governments concerned (EUR 60 million), by recourse to the Rapid Reaction Mechanism (EUR 12 million) and by the mobilisation of the emergency reserve (EUR 70 million). Since the ceiling for heading 4 ‘External actions’ is already exceeded by EUR 100 million in 2005, and all possibilities for reallocating appropriations under this heading have been examined, EUR 15 million will be financed by an additional deployment of the flexibility instrument,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

For the amending budget No 3/2005 to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2005, the flexibility instrument shall be used to provide the sum of EUR 15 000 000 in commitment appropriations.

This amount shall be used for the financing of aid for rehabilitation and reconstruction of the earthquake/tsunami affected countries in Asia, covered by heading 4 ‘External actions’ of the financial perspective, under Article 19 10 04 ‘Rehabilitation and reconstruction operations in developing countries in Asia’ of the 2005 budget.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Strasbourg, 7 September 2005.

For the European Parliament

The President

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

For the Council

The President

D. ALEXANDER

---

(1)  
  OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1. Agreement amended by Decision 2003/429/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p. 25).

1

---
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3386 

To temporarily suspend the importation of beef and beef products from 

Paraguay and to require the establishment of a working group to evaluate 

the threat to food safety and animal health posed by beef imported 

from Paraguay, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 4, 2023 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To temporarily suspend the importation of beef and beef 

products from Paraguay and to require the establishment 

of a working group to evaluate the threat to food safety 

and animal health posed by beef imported from Paraguay, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF IMPORTS OF 

4 BEEF AND BEEF PRODUCTS FROM PARA5 GUAY. 

6 Beef and beef products imported from Paraguay may 

7 not enter the United States during the period— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3386 IS

1 (1) beginning on the date of the enactment of 

2 this Act; and 

3 (2) ending on the date on which the working 

4 group established under section 2 submits the rec5 ommendations required by subsection (a)(3) of that 

6 section if the working group determines under sub7 section (a)(1) of that section that beef and beef 

8 products imported from Paraguay do not pose a 

9 threat to food safety and animal health in the 

10 United States. 

11 SEC. 2. WORKING GROUP ON BEEF IMPORTED FROM PARA12 GUAY. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the 

14 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agri15 culture shall establish a working group— 

16 (1) to evaluate the threat posed by beef and 

17 beef products imported from Paraguay to food safe18 ty and animal health in the United States; 

19 (2) to report on the most recent disease data 

20 and conduct additional research on the threat to 

21 food safety and animal health; and 

22 (3) to make recommendations to the Secretary 

23 with respect to whether the importation of beef and 

24 beef products from Paraguay into the United States 

25 should be permitted. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3386 IS

1 (b) MEMBERSHIP.—The Secretary shall ensure that 

2 the working group established under subsection (a) in3 cludes— 

4 (1) experts on food safety; 

5 (2) experts on animal health; and 

6 (3) representatives of U.S. Customs and Border 

7 Protection and other Federal agencies with respon8 sibilities relating to international trade. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
ARS HomeNatural Resources and Sustainable Agricultural SystemsSustainable Agricultural Systems ResearchResearch

----

Program Team
- Sarah Beebout, co-Lead
2022 Research Highlights
- Expanding Public Access to Agricultural Information
Program Inputs
-                 Workshops             
-                 Strategic Vision             
-                 Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) Network             
Program Planning
-                 Action Plan             
Program Reports
-                 Organic Agriculture Production Research             
-                 Annual Reports             
-                 Accomplishment Reports             
-                 Assessment Reports             
Project Information
- List of Projects in this Program
- List of Project Annual Reports in this program

**Listed below are the Annual Reports for currently active projects directly assigned to this National Program.**
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward West, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 11, 2008
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ Edward F. West     
|Name:                 |  | Edward F. West         
|Title:                |  | Chief Executive Officer

I, R. Brian Gibson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



|                      |  |                                                                
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2008
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ R. Brian Gibson                                            
|Name:                 |  | R. Brian Gibson                                                
|Title:                |  | Principal Accounting Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAVID LINCOLN LEE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 367 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.