alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM N-PX ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF DWS Lifecycle Long Range Fund A Series of DWS Advisor Funds III Investment Company Act file number  811-06576 DWS Advisor Funds III (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)  345 Park Avenue New York, NY  10154 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code) John Millette Secretary One Beacon Street Boston, MA  02108-3106 (Name and address of agent for service) Registrant's telephone number, including area code:617-295-1000 Date of fiscal year end:09/30 Date of reporting period:7/1/07-6/30/08 Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles. A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.  ******************************* FORM N-Px REPORT *******************************

ICA File Number: 811-06576
Reporting Period: 07/01/2007 - 06/30/2008
DWS Advisor Funds III









===================== A      DWS LIFECYCLE LONG RANGE FUND =====================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND

========== END NPX REPORT  
  SIGNATURES [See General Instruction F] Pursuant to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. (Registrant)
        DWS Advisor Funds III
  By (Signature and Title)*/s/Michael G. Clark Michael G. Clark, Chief Executive Officer
 Date8/15/08 * Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.
# EUR-Lex - 32005M3757 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005M3757

**Commission Decision of 15/04/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3757 - 3i / PROVIDENCE /CROWN ENTERTAINMENT) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

| |Brussels, 15/04/2005

SG-Greffe(2005) D/201789/90

To the notifying parties

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject : Case No. COMP/M. 3757 – 3i/Providence/Crown Entertainment Notification of 09/03/2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 65, 17.03.2005

1. On 09/03/2005 , the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which the undertakings 3i Group (“3i”, UK) and Providence Equity Offshore Partners IV (“Providence”, USA) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the undertakings Crown Entertainment (UK) and Crown Media International (USA) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are :

- for 3i: international private equity house;

- for Providence: global private investment firm specializing in media and communications companies;

- for Crown Entertainment and Crown Media International: compile and distribute the Hallmark branded pay-TV channels.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraphs 5a and 5c of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004[2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

(signed)Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.03.2005 p. 32

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
Exhibit
32.2
 Certification
of Principal Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I,
Jonathan LaBarre, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Stamford Industrial Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Stamford
Industrial Group, Inc.
 
 
 
 Date:  May 11,
      2009
                By:
                /s/ Jonathan
      LaBarreName:
                Jonathan
      LaBarreTitle:
                Chief
      Financial Officer, Secretary and
  Treasurer
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**SCHEDULE      TO EXHIBIT 10.21**

**Indemnification      Agreements with Directors and Executive Officers**

|       | Name                                        | Date                of Agreement |
|------------|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Directors: |                                        |                             |
|       | John                R. Alm                  | February                28, 2006 |
|       | David                H. Batchelder          | January                25, 2002  |
|       | Michael                R. D’Appolonia | March                25, 2002    |
|       | C.                Scott Greer               | March                25, 2002    |
|       | Gail                E. Hamilton             | August                16, 2005   |
|       | Stephen                G. Hanks             | January                25, 2002  |
|       | William                H. Mallender         | March                25, 2002    |
|       | Michael                P. Monaco            | March                25, 2002    |
|       | Cordell                Reed                 | March                25, 2002    |
|       | Dennis                R. Washington         | January                25, 2002  |
|       | Dennis                K. Williams           | March                25, 2002    |
| Officers:  |                                        |                             |
|       | Stephen                M. Johnson           | January                25, 2002  |
|       | George                H. Juetten            | January                25, 2002  |
|       | Jerry                K. Lemon               | October                13, 2003  |
|       | Larry                L. Myers               | January                25, 2002  |
|       | Richard                D. Parry             | January                25, 2002  |
|       | Cynthia                M. Stinger           | January                25, 2002  |
|       | Craig                G. Taylor              | January                25, 2002  |
|       | Earl                L. Ward                 | August                14, 2002   |
|       | Thomas                H. Zarges             | January                25, 2002  |
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3536 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3536

  To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to require 
 notification with respect to individualized education program teams, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2023

   Mr. Braun introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to require 
 notification with respect to individualized education program teams, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Think Differently about Education 
Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR IEP TEAMS.

    Section 614(d) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 
(20 U.S.C. 1414(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) Notification required.--At the beginning of each 
        school year, each local educational agency, State educational 
        agency, or other State agency, as the case may be, shall notify 
        each parent of a child with a disability in the agency's 
        jurisdiction that such parent may, under paragraph (1)(B)(vi), 
        include individuals who have knowledge or special expertise 
        regarding the child, including related services personnel as 
        appropriate, as part of the individualized education program 
        team for such child.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26933]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-22-008]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 1, 1997, Northern Border Pipeline 
Company (Northern Border) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets to 
become effective November 1, 1997:
    Northern Border states that this filing is made to comply with the 
letter order of the Commission dated June 2, 1997, in which the 
Commission directed Northern Border to file tariff sheets to implement 
the revised and new business practices standards. Because the Version 
1.1 implementation guides do not include the data dictionaries 
necessary to implement the standards, Northern Border is proposing to 
utilize the data dictionaries set forth in the Version 1.2 
implementation guides. These guides contain the only published source 
of the data dictionaries necessary to implement the standards adopted 
in Order No. 587-C, such as Package ID.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26933 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3570 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3570

  To designate the United States courthouse located at 500 West Pike 
 Street in Clarksburg, West Virginia, as the ``Irene M. Keeley United 
              States Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 10, 2024

  Mrs. Capito (for herself and Mr. Manchin) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 500 West Pike 
 Street in Clarksburg, West Virginia, as the ``Irene M. Keeley United 
              States Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IRENE M. KEELEY UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The United States courthouse located at 500 West 
Pike Street in Clarksburg, West Virginia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Irene M. Keeley United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States 
courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Irene M. Keeley United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3275 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow certain funds to be used 

for incremental costs of incorporating art into facilities, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2023 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself and Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow certain 

funds to be used for incremental costs of incorporating 

art into facilities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saving Transit Art 

5 Resources Act’’ or the ‘‘STAR Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALLOWING ART. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5323(h) of title 49, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3275 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or’’ after 

2 the semicolon; 

3 (2) by striking paragraph (2); and 

4 (3) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para5 graph (2). 

6 (b) NO SPECIAL RULE.—Section 5309 of title 49, 

7 United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) by striking subsection (p); and 

9 (2) by redesignating subsections (q) and (r) as 

10 subsections (p) and (q), respectively. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
FHWA-SA-21-048

Road Safety Audit

While most transportation agencies have established traditional safety 

review procedures, a road safety audit (RSA) or assessment is unique. RSAs 

are performed by a multidisciplinary team independent of the project. RSAs 

consider all road users, account for human factors and road user capabilities, 

are documented in a formal report, and require a formal response from the 

road owner. (See the eight steps for conducting an RSA below.)

RSAs provide the following 

benefits:

• Reduced number and severity of

crashes due to safer designs.

• Reduced costs resulting from early

identification and mitigation of

safety issues before projects are

built.

• Increased opportunities to

integrate multimodal safety

strategies and proven safety

countermeasures.

• Expanded ability to consider

human factors in all facets of

design.

• Increased communication and

collaboration among safety

stakeholders.

• Objective review by independent

multidisciplinary team.

RSAs can be performed in any 

phase of project development, 

from planning through construction. 

Agencies may focus RSAs 

specifically on motorized vehicles, 

pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists, 

or a combination of these roadway 

users. Agencies are encouraged 

to conduct an RSA at the earliest 

stage possible, as all roadway design 

options and alternatives are being 

explored.

Multidisciplinary team performs field review 

during an RSA. Source: FHWA

10-60%

reduction in total crashes.1

Source: FHWA 

Safety Benefits:

1 Road Safety Audits: An Evaluation of RSA Programs and Projects, 

FHWA-SA-12-037; and FHWA Road Safety Audit Guidelines, FHWA-SA-06-06.

OFFICE OF SAFETY

Proven Safety 

Countermeasures

For more information on this 

and other FHWA Proven Safety 

Countermeasures, please visit 

https://highways.dot.gov/

safety/proven-safety-counter 

measures and https:// 

highways.dot.gov/safety/

data-analysis-tools/systemic/

road-safety-audits-rsa.
#### Herman Ray MOORE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 71-188.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 13, 1971.

Habeas corpus dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of EnergyConnect Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the twelve months ended January 3, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that:





The
Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





The
information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 25th day of March
2009.








/s/ Kevin R.
Evans


Kevin R.
Evans


Chief
Executive Officer
NO. 07-10-00479-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

JULY 26, 2011

CHRIS ALLEN MCLAIN, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

NO. A18122-0908; HONORABLE EDWARD LEE SELF, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**ON MOTION TO DISMISS**

Appellant, Chris Allen McLain, filed Notice of Appeal to appeal a judgment of conviction for the offense of possession of a controlled substance entered after revocation of appellant’s community supervision, and sentence of four years’ incarceration.  Appellant’s appointed counsel filed an Anders brief and motion to withdraw.  However, appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss his appeal.

Because the motion meets the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and this Court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving it, the motion is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed.  Having dismissed the appeal at appellants request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue.

								Mackey K. Hancock

									Justice

2

Do not publish.  

2
#### Louis T. SAYRE and Parker M. Paine, as *Trustees of Rosenbaum Grain*Corporation, Libelants-Appellants, v. Joseph A. RYAN, Respondent-Appellee, Barge THE ANNIE BULGER, Claimant-Appellee.

No. 226.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 1, 1937.

William J. Mahar, of New York City (William J. Mahar and Edward L. P. O’Connor, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Macklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, of New York City (Richard F. Lenahan and Leo Hanan, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                             EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                             STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                        SALARIED EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN

         WHEREAS, Sterling Chemicals, Inc. (the "Corporation") currently
maintains its Amended and Restated Salaried Employees' Pension Plan (as amended,
the "Existing Plan");

         WHEREAS, Section 15.1 reserves to the Corporation the right to amend
the Existing Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Existing Plan to fully
vest certain participants who will be transferred to an unrelated third party;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         Section 1. Amendment of Section 2.2 of the Existing Plan. Section 2.2
of the Existing Plan is amended to add the following paragraph at the end:

         "Notwithstanding the vesting schedule stated in this Section 2.2, the
         accrued benefit of each employee who is active on the payroll of
         Sterling Fibers, Inc., Sterling Pulp Chemicals US, Inc., or Sterling
         Pulp Chemicals, Inc. (collectively, the "Subsidiaries"), on the date in
         December 2002 that the Subsidiaries are sold to an unrelated third
         party, shall be fully vested as of the sale date."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has executed this instrument this
______ day of ___________, 2002.

                                        STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.

                                        _______________________________________
                                        David G. Elkins, President and Co-Chief
                                              Executive Officer

                                       1
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,  I, Robin List, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by this Report.

 

 
| Date:    September 5, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Robin List                |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                                           |   | Robin List                    |
|                                           |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                                           |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |