alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NIHSeniorHealth: Transcript "Are there Medications to Control Kidney Disease?"

file:///C|/...test/gpo20739/NIHSeniorHealth%20Transcript%20Are%20there%20Medications%20to%20Control%20Kidney%20Disease.htm[1/13/2014 10:10:12 AM]

Transcript: "Are there Medications to Control Kidney Disease?"

Narrator: A doctor speaks with a patient in his office.

Patient: Are there medications for kidney disease?

Doctor: Well, most people with diabetes or high blood pressure, which are the major causes of

chronic kidney disease, are on a number of medications. They are on medications to lower blood

sugar if they have diabetes. They are on medications frequently for blood cholesterol, and they may

be on other medications. Controlling high blood pressure is very important. And most people with

chronic kidney disease require several medications. Among the medicines that we use to control

blood pressure are two kinds of medicines that have a specific benefit to the kidney. They not only

lower blood pressure but they are actually known to protect the kidney from damage. Those

medications are either ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, also known as ARBs. Many

people with chronic kidney disease benefit from being on these medications among all the other

medications that they might be on.

Patient: What about a water pill?

Doctor: Well, many people with chronic kidney disease and high blood pressure are on what's known

as a water pill. The medical name is a diuretic.And it's actually not a water pill; it's a pill to help your

kidney get rid of salt. And as it gets rid of salt, the water follows. People can avoid having to take a

water pill or diuretic or may be able to reduce their dose if they're careful about the amount of salt

that they eat.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alexis Korybut, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Alexis Korybut  Alexis Korybut Chief Financial Officer August 22, 2011
# L_2006033EN.01008801.xml

| 4.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 33/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 33/88

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2005/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2005 amending for the 22nd time Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (phthalates in toys and childcare articles)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 344 of 27 December 2005
  )

On page 43, in the Annex, in the column regarding numbering of phthalates:

for:

„[XX.]“ and „[XXa.]“,

read:

„51.“ and „51a.“

---
****
 **EXHIBIT
31.1**
  
 **CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 
 I, Nigel
P. Ekern, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Net Perceptions, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
      May 13, 2005/s/ Nigel P.
      EkernName:  Nigel P.
      EkernTitle:  Chief Administrative Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.8

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                       RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                      PROXYMED, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION


        Pursuant to the provisions of Section 607.1006, Florida Statutes,
ProxyMed, Inc. (the "Corporation") adopts the following Articles of Amendment to
its Restated Articles of Incorporation:

FIRST:            The Article III of the Corporation's Restated Articles of
                  Incorporation is amended by striking out the first paragraph
                  thereof and by substituting in lieu of said paragraph the
                  following new first paragraph to Article III:

                  "The Corporation is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of
                  Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, and 2,000,000 shares
                  of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share."

SECOND:           This Amendment was adopted by the shareholders at the
                  Corporation's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on July 7,
                  2000. The number of votes cast were sufficient for approval.

Dated as of the 7th day of July, 2000.

                                     ProxyMed, Inc.




                                     By: /s/ HAROLD S. BLUE
                                         ----------------------------------
                                         Harold S. Blue, Chairman of the Board
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of United Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Evelyn F. Smalls, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '1350, as adopted pursuant to '906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

/s/ Evelyn F. Smalls 

 

Evelyn F. Smalls

Chief Executive Officer

 

December 23, 2019
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

▲

▲ ★

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/03

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 03 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■

■ ■

● ★

●

●

●

★ ●

●

●

●
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>           <C>                         <C>
REGISTRANT:   Name:                       ProxyMed, Inc.
              State of Incorporation:     Florida


SUBSIDIARIES: Name:                       Hayes Telecommunication Services, Inc.
              State of Incorporation:     Florida

              Name:                       Key Communications Service, Inc.
              State of Incorporation:     Indiana

              Name:                       ProxyCare, Inc.
              State of Incorporation:     Florida

              Name:                       WPJ, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Medical Systems
              State of Incorporation:     California
</TABLE>
EXPLORATORY ADVANCEDRE

SE

AR

CH
## AGENDA

NASF

– EPA Meeting

Mist Suppressants and Long

- Chain PFCs

April 15, 2010

1. Introductions

2. Industry Overview

a. Use of Long

- Chain PFCs in Surface Finishing

b. Drivers

– Existing EPA & OSHA PEL Cr6 Requirements

c. Options for Reducing / Eliminating Use of Long

- Chain PFCs

i. Status of Alternative Mist Suppressant Chemistries

ii. Industry Best Practices

3. Recent Industry / EPA Action

a. 2007 SNUR

b. Minnesota Industry Data

– Brainerd

c. EPA Region 5 Electroplating Study

d. Industry Proposal

– Sustainable Technology Project

e. Industr y Engagement with POTWs

4. Emerging Options for Reducing Long

- Chain PFC Uses

a. EPA Chromium NESHAP Risk & Technology Review (RTR)

b. EPA Chemical Action Plan for Long

- Chain PFCs

c. Minnesota Initiatives Underway

5. Next Steps

a. Upcoming Industry Meetings

– April / Jun e 2010

b. EPA

- Industry Partnership

c. Regulatory Issues
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 54790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27635]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR PART 68

[CC Docket Nos. 96-128 and 91-35; DA 97-1793]


Pay Telephone Equipment Grandfathering

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rules; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission issues a correction to 
the previously published final rule in 62 FR 47371, September 9, 1997, 
concerning the connection of terminal equipment to the telephone 
network. The rule allows certain terminal equipment presently connected 
to central-office-implemented payphones to remain connected without 
registration. This correction is issued to clarify that the rule 
applies to the ``central-office-implemented telephone line'' rather 
than the ``central-office-implemented telephone.'' The correction is 
intended clarify the distinction between terminal equipment and a 
central-office-implemented telephone line.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Technical Information: William Von Alven, 202-418-2342.
    Legal Information: Alan Thomas, 202-418-2338.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 68.2(l) (1) and (2) are corrected. 
68.2(1) is corrected by inserting the word ``line'' after the phrase 
``central-office-implemented telephone'' in the first sentence. Section 
68.2(l)(2) is corrected by inserting the word ``line'' after the phrase 
``central-office-implemented telephone'' in the first and second 
sentences.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 68

    Communications common carriers, Communications equipment, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements.

Federal Communications Commission.
LaVera F. Marshall,
Acting Secretary.

Correction

    For the reasons discussed in Supplementary Information make the 
following corrections.


Sec. 68.2  [Corrected]

    1. On page 47371, in the third column, in Sec. 68.2, in paragraph 
(l)(1), in lines 3 and 4, the phrase ``central-office-implemented 
telephone'' is corrected to read ``central-office-implemented telephone 
line.''
    2. On page 47371, in the third column, in Sec. 68.2, in paragraph 
(l)(2), in lines 4 and 5 and lines 8 and 9, the phrase ``central-
office-implemented telephone'' is corrected to read ``central-office-
implemented telephone line.''
[FR Doc. 97-27635 Filed 10-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title: Debates on the federal judiciary  : a documentary history
Volume  1  |  Volume  2 | Volume 3
 
SuDoc Number  JU 13.2:D 35/ 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Item    Number  0743-C-01 
CGP    System Number  000914077    
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  October 12,  2000  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3238 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3238

To make a supplemental appropriation to the Secretary of State to carry 
     out the mission and activities of the United States Security 
         Coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 7, 2023

Mr. Ossoff (for himself and Mr. Graham) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make a supplemental appropriation to the Secretary of State to carry 
     out the mission and activities of the United States Security 
         Coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``USSC Emergency Supplemental Act''.

SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR UNITED STATES SECURITY 
              COORDINATOR FOR ISRAEL AND THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY.

    In addition to amounts otherwise available, there is appropriated 
to the Secretary of State, out of amounts in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, $10,000,000, to remain available until expended, to carry 
out the mission and activities of the United States Security 
Coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority.
                                 <all>
```
#### Joseph E. FILECCI, Appellant, v. Frank M. BUCHANAN, D. C. Coleman, Jr., Charles B. Ledbetter, III, d/b/a Coleman-Ledbetter-Buchanan Insurance and Gordon K. Welch, Appellees.

No. 69-526.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 18, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
January 19, 2001

No. 00-1075.

#### Motient Services Inc. *v.*Federal Communications Commission.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.1.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                JURISDICTION OF
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                               INCORPORATION 
------------------                                              ---------------
<S>                                                             <C>
Dal-Tile Group Inc.................................................Delaware
Dal-Tile Corporation...............................................Pennsylvania
R&M Supplies, Inc..................................................Delaware
Tileways, Inc......................................................Delaware
DTM/CM Holdings, Inc...............................................Delaware
Dal-Minerals Company...............................................Delaware
Dal-Tile of Canada Inc.............................................Ontario
Dal-Tile Mexico, S.A. de C.V.......................................Mexico
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28056]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-16-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

October 17, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 14, 1997, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff 
sheets, with an effective date of December 1, 1997:

Second Revised Sheet No. 95B
Second Revised Sheet No. 96
Second Revised Sheet No. 106
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 204
First Revised Sheet No. 361

    Tennessee states that it is submitting these revised tariff sheets 
in order to effectuate changes to its tariff that would (i) tailor 
Tennessee's Maximum Allowed Volume (MAV) tariff provisions to provide 
for a more targeted approach to implementation of Unauthorized Overrun 
charges; (ii) allow for a greater tolerance for small volume customers 
who have minimal operational impact on Tennessee's system; (iii) 
increase the penalties to be assessed for MAV unauthorized overruns and 
for failure to comply with Operational Flow Orders (OFOs); and (iv) 
modify certain tariff provisions relating to firm and interruptible 
storage service.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
this proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and available for public inspection in the Public Reference 
Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28056 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Perry L. HOLE, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, a Municipal Corporation, et al.

No. 10671.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 11, 1936.

David H. Robertson, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

E. H. Wayman, City Counselor, and Oliver Senti, Associate City Counselor, both of St. Louis, Mo., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellees and motion of appellant, at costs of appellant.
EXHIBIT 23.1



                  ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
CORT Business Services Corporation and subsidiaries:


The audits  referred  to in our report  dated  February  13, 1998  included  the
related financial  statement schedules as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for
each of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December 31, 1997,  included
herein.  These  financial  statement  schedules  are the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an opinion on these
financial  statement  schedules  based  on  our  audits.  In our  opinion,  such
financial  statement  schedules,  when  considered  in  relation  to  the  basic
consolidated  financial  statements  taken as a  whole,  present  fairly  in all
material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration  statements on Form
S-3 (No.  33-99008) and on Forms S-8 (Nos.  33-72724,  333-15611,  333-15613) of
CORT  Business  Services  Corporation  of our reports  dated  February 13, 1998,
relating  to  the  consolidated   balance  sheets  of  CORT  Business   Services
Corporation  and  subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December  31, 1997,  and all
related  schedules,  which reports appear, or are incorporated by reference,  in
the  December  31, 1997  annual  report on form 10-K of CORT  Business  Services
Corporation.





                                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Washington, DC
March 28, 1998
Order entered January 6 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 01708 - CV IN RE THE ESTATE OF VERNON LEE DOWNING, DECEASE D On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 10 - 02214 - 3 

### O RDER Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Lewis, and Brown We GRANT appellant’s December 18, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file her notice of appeal. The notice of appeal filed on December 18, 2013 is deemed timely for jurisdictional purposes.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE