alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity
as an officer of International Fuel Technology Inc. ("IFT"), that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of IFT on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report
fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of IFT.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to IFT and will be retained by IFT and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


By: /s/ Michael F. Obertop              Date: August 12, 2003
   --------------------------------
   Michael F. Obertop
   Chief Financial Officer


                                       17
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24D0217. SHOHEL MOMIN v. JEREMY ANDERSON et al.

Based on the limited application materials, it appears that Pearl Garden Homes,

LLC and Goodson, LLC brought this property dispute against Jeremy and Traci

Anderson. The Andersons then filed a third-party complaint against Shohel Momin,

RW Investments, LLC, and Richard Walker. Momin filed a motion for summary

judgment, which the trial court granted. Momin then filed a motion seeking attorney

fees under OCGA § 9-15-14. The trial court denied that motion, and Momin now

seeks discretionary review. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Generally, a party must followthe discretionary appeal procedures to appeal an

order awarding or denying OCGA § 9-15-14 attorney fees. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a)

(10).This action, however, involves multiple parties and claims, and thematerials that

Momin submitted with his application contain no indication that the trial court has

adjudicated any claims other than the third-party claims against Momin. Thus, it

appears that this action remains pending below and that the order Momin wishes to

appeal is interlocutory. See Eidson v. Croutch, 337 Ga. App. 542, 543-544 (788 SE2d

129) (2016) (holding that an award of attorney fees issued before final judgment is

interlocutory). Under these circumstances, Momin was required to follow the

interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), including obtaining

a certificate of immediate review, to pursue an appeal at this juncture.1 See Bailey v.

1

Perhaps in recognition of this fact, Momin styled the application as one for

interlocutory review. But without the certificate of immediate review required by

OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), we docketed the application as one for discretionary review.

February 02, 2024
Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996); Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human

Resources, 261 Ga. 587, 588-589 (1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991). Although Momin filed an

application for discretionary appeal, as described in OCGA§ 5-6-35, compliance with

that procedure does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory

order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See

Bailey, 266 Ga. at 833; Eidson, 337 Ga. App. at 543. Momin’s failure to follow the

interlocutory appeal procedures deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this

application, which is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/02/2024
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSRS

 

Investment Company Act file number  811-642

 

DWS International Fund, Inc.

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 08/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 2/28/09 |
|---------------------------|---------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

----
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 29, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

06-20202

Summary Calendar

MAXINE NICHOLSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SPRING SAND & CLAY LP,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas, Houston

4:04-cv-01601

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant appeals pro se from a jury verdict in favor of her

employer in a discrimination case. Appellant points to no error.

There is no legal argument or citation in the brief—only general

conclusions. Although this Court liberally construes the briefs of

pro se appellants, we also require that arguments be briefed to be

preserved. Price v. Digital Equip. Corp., 846 F.2d 1026, 1028 (5th
2

Cir. 1988) (citations omitted). Accordingly, Appellant has

abandoned her arguments by failing to argue them in the body of her

brief. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993)

(citing Fed.R.App.P. 28(a)(4)). 

In addition, to the extent her brief reflects her

disappointment with counsel, the Sixth Amendment right to counsel

does not apply to civil proceedings. Sanchez v. United States

Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986). 

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6251

MICHAEL RAY WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RICK JACKSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District

Judge. (CA-00-170-5-F3)

Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Ray Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith,

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ray Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Williams’ motions for appointment of counsel and for a certificate

of appealability, and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. Williams v. Jackson, No. CA-00-170-5-F3 (E.D.N.C.

Jan. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.51


                       THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AND
                           OEM MANUFACTURING AGREEMENT


         The License and OEM Manufacturing Agreement ("LOEMMA") with an
effective date of July 1, 2002, by and among EchoStar Satellite Corporation,
EchoStar Technologies Corporation and Thomson multimedia Inc. is hereby amended
as follows:

         1.   Section 11.16 is amended to read:

         The Parties shall mutually agree to a trademark agreement (the
         "Trademark Agreement") to be attached as Exhibit E hereto on or before
         October 8, 2002.

         2.   Unless specifically defined herein, all defined terms will have
              the meaning ascribed to such terms in the LOEMMA. The LOEMMA shall
              remain in all other respects unchanged.



EchoStar Satellite Corporation              EchoStar Technologies Corporation

By:                                         By:
       ---------------------------                 -----------------------------

Title:                                      Title:
       ---------------------------                 -----------------------------

Date:                                       Date:
       ---------------------------                 -----------------------------


Thomson multimedia Inc.

By:
       ---------------------------

Title:
       ---------------------------

Date:
       ---------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 32005M3777 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005M3777

**Commission Decision of 24/05/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3777 - STORA ENSO / CORENSO) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3777 — Stora Enso/Corenso)

(2005/C 138/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 24 May 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

- from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

- in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3777. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

--------------------------------------------------
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-919 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR SAFETY 

 Arrangement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SWEDEN 

Signed at Vienna September 19, 2011 

with 

Addenda 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
SWEDEN 

Nuclear Safety 

 Arrangement signed at Vienna September 19, 2011; 

 Entered into force September 19, 2011. 

 With addenda.
Ja

~ jtr0 STq r

~ S
S ~ A'Z UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY o ~~~ /J a WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

~ F

~

O

~ l qG PROj ~~'~ OCT 1 22 

### William B. Mackie Acting Director, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office OFFICE OF Department of Energy AIR AND RADIATION 

### P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221 Dear Mr. Mackie: We received your letter dated September 30, 2010, requesting the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft expansion memo CBFO plans to issue to extend the calibration range of the Nondestructive Assay Box Counter (NABC) and add three remote-handled (RH) waste streams generated by the Battelle Columbus Laboratory (BCL) characterized by the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Savannah River Site (SRS). This request is in accordance with the CBFO procedures that are intended to ensure that the U. S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site certifications correlate appropriately with EPA approvals for waste characterization activities at DOE transuranic (TRU) waste generator sites. On September 14, 2010, EPA approved the extension of the calibration range of the NABC (See EPA Air pocket No A-98-49, II-A4-133) and on September 9, 2010, EPA approved the SRS-CCP implemented RH waste characterization process for six BCL generated waste streams (See EPA Air pocket No A-98-49, II-A4-129). On September 16 2010, EPA concurred with a draft site expansion certification memo to add the other three approved waste streams. EPA has also received and reviewed quarterly tiering reports covering the waste characterization program implemented by CCP at SRS and have found all changes made to be acceptable. EPA concurs that the waste characterization equipment, procedures and waste streams encompassed in DOE's draft expansion memo comport with all of EPA's existing approvals for RH waste at SRS-CCP. Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft expansion memo for SRS CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Ed Feltcorn (202-343-9422) or Rajani Joglekar (202-343-9462).
Sincerely,



# ~ e

~ 

# ,t y _— Edward Feltcorn Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable o Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper

### cc: Ava Holland, CBFO QA

Norma Castaneda, CBFO Court Fesmire, CBFO J. R. Stroble, CBFO Martin Navarrete, CBFO Dennis Miehls, CBFO Allison Pangle, CTAC Porf Martinez, CTAC
255 La. 476

#### Joseph CASTILLE et al. v. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE CO.

No. 50358.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 27, 1970.

In re: Lee Rosette applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 229 So.2d 453.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Written Statementof the Chief Financial Officer**

I,Jason A. Jenne, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TrueTemper Sports, Inc. (the “Company”), state and certify that this Form 10-QQuarterly Report for the period ended July 2, 2006, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Form 10-QQuarterly Report for the period ended July 2, 2006, fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| /s/ JASON  A. JENNE                           |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jason A. Jenne                                |   |
| *Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and* |   |
| *Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)*     |   |
| August 16, 2006                               |   |

 

----
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: National  compensation survey. State and local government. Cedar Rapids,  IA [electronic resource].
SuDocs Number: L 2.121/15:C 32/
Item    Number: 0768-B-15    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000868061
 
 
 
2007
2008
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  May 19, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 10, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00214

- CV

MISSION RIDGE P.U.D. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant

v.

Robyn M. HINES, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI11100 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The record was due May 9, 2018, but it was not filed. The clerk and court reporter have each filed a notification of late record stating the record has not been filed because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fees to prepare the record and appellant is not entitled to the record without paying the fee.

We order appellant Mission Ridge P.U.D. Homeowners Association to provide writ ten proof to this court by May 21, 2018 that the clerk’s fee and the reporter’s fee have been paid or that arrangements satisfactory to the clerk and reporter have been made to pay the fees. If appellant fails to file such proof wit h respect to the clerk’s record within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b). If timely proof is filed regarding payment for the clerk’s record, but not as to the reporter’s record, appellant ’s

brief will be due June 11, 2018 , and the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of t he said

court on this 10th day of May, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-909 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MARITIME INTERDICTION 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and TUVALU 

Signed at Auckland September 9, 2011 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
TUVALU 

Maritime Interdiction 

 Agreement signed at Auckland September 9, 2011; 

 Entered into force September 9, 2011. 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3249 

AN ACT 

To designate the outpatient clinic of the Department of 

Veterans Affairs in Wyandotte County, Kansas City, 

Kansas, as the ‘‘Captain Elwin Shopteese VA Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3249 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CAPTAIN ELWIN SHOPTEESE 

2 VA CLINIC. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The outpatient clinic of the De4 partment of Veterans Affairs located at 9201 Parallel 

5 Parkway, Kansas City, Kansas, shall after the date of the 

6 enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Captain Elwin Shopteese Department of Veterans Af8 fairs Clinic’’ or the ‘‘Captain Elwin Shopteese VA Clinic’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula10 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the outpatient clinic referred to in subsection 

12 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Captain Elwin 

13 Shopteese VA Clinic. 

Passed the Senate May 2, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3249 

AN ACT 

To designate the outpatient clinic of the DepartShopteese VA Clinic’’. Kansas City, Kansas, as the ‘‘Captain Elwin ment of Veterans Affairs in Wyandotte County,
December 15, 2011 

Mr. Rodney Green 

Arizona Helicopter Adventures 

235 Air Terminal Drive 

Sedona, Arizona 86323 

Dear Mr. Green: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

part 121, appendices I and J of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains 

why we can’t process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can’t Process Your Request 

We entered your December 14, 2011 exemption request on behalf of Arizona Helicopter 

Adventures, LLC into the public docket (No. FAA-2008-0842), but we are unable to process 

your request any further. The information you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 

14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us 

all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to 

send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 
2 

If We Don’t Hear From You 

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Cindy Nordlie 

Acting Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure 
3 

Project No.: AFS-12-126-E 

Project Officer: _______________ 

ARM-101:KJones:12/14/11:Doc#33497 

ARM-1/100/10:Program Office AAM-800 

 Statistics: Reject Letter.doc, 385 words 

 Original, 14 Dec 2011 11:46 

 Style Index 10 Excellent for a Legal Document 

 Average Sentence Length 21 Good

 Passive Index 0 Excellent

MR RODNEY GREEN 

ARIZONA HELICOPTER ADVENTURES 

235 AIR TERMINAL DRIVE 

SEDONA ARIZONA 86323
#### Joan Capdevielle, wife of Curtis R. BOISFONTAINE v. Curtis R. BOISFONTAINE.

No. 62175.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Curtis R. Boisfontaine applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of *645Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 357 So.2d 90.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, J., would grant the writ.
255 La. 1101

#### STATE of Louisiana v. BROWN’S THRIFT CITY ETHICAL PHARMACY, INC.

No. 50517.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 4, 1970.

In re: Brown’s Thrift City Ethical Pharmacy, Inc. applying for writ of certiorari.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the relief sought.