alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28469]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Federal Advisory Committee on 
International Exhibitions

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Federal Advisory Committee on International Exhibitions (FACIE) 
to the National Council on the Arts will be held on November 17, 1997. 
The panel will meet from 10:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. in Room 716 at the 
Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20506. A portion of this meeting, from 3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., will be 
open to the public for a policy discussion.
    The remaining portion of this meeting, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:30 
p.m., is for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and 
recommendation on applications for financial assistance under the 
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including information given in confidence to the agency by 
grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman 
of March 31, 1997, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant 
to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United 
States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-TDD 
202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: October 22, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-28469 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
#### Harry BLOCH and Marylou Bloch, his wife, Petitioners, v. Ben GUTTERSON, Respondent.

No. 40361.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 18, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 239 So.2d 652.

ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and . BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, C. J., dissents.
#### Martha BEUTNAGEL, a widow, and Werner Alfred Beutnagel, Appellants, v. STONE BUICK, INC., a Florida corporation, Robert B. Plumb and Genrose D. Plumb, his wife, and Union Oil Company of California, a California corporation, formerly The Pure Oil Co., an Ohio corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-925.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 22, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2005101EN.01002401.xml

| 27.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/24

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3745 — Severstal/Lucchini)

(2005/C 101/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 11 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3745. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3745. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Hi. My name is Anne Usher and I'm a former journaiist and volunteer with 

the Virginia chapter of the Sierra Club. Thank you for holding this hearing. 

For more than 40 years, air pollution has been regulated by the 

Environmental Protection Agency because of its direct harm to 

Americans' heaith. 

The EPA now has an equal - and scientists wouid argue more urgent duty - to reguiate CO2 emissions. It 

is now beyond dispute that these emissions will not oniy impact the giobal environment and our 

environment here at home, but 41'aiso directty and indirectty Impac>jpur weifare as human beings. 

Here on the east coast, we have witnessed the ravaging effects of Hurricane Sandy. Climate scientists 

predict we will see more superstorms, sea level rise that will alter our coastlines and more prolonged 

droughts such as we've witnessed in Texas. 

In northem Virginia where I live, this ability to regulate carbon emissions has never been more crucial. 

Just under half the electricity that powers my state - and my home - comes from dirty coal fired power 

piants. These plants are directly contributing to climate change, and our coastal towns are indeed on the 

front lines. 

Some lawmakers - whose campaigns have been heavily funded by this industry - ciaim that taking this 

responsibie action might cost jobs. On the contrary, in vrginia, ciean energy jobs are increasing at a rate 

of more than 8 percent a year. (1) The old jobs are already falling off because coal deposits - in very 

steep, erosion prone slopes - have been nearly fully exploited. 

Still much more needs to be done to encourage this sector in Virginia. Only 4 percent of electricity is 

expected to come from clean renewable sources - including solar and wind - this year. It's goal by 2025 is 

a mere 15 percent. That pace simply isn't fast enough. Right now, we have no utility-scaie wind or solar 

projects and very few customer-owned projects. 

This and other EPA proposals are ultimately about taking modest steps to limit carbon emissions 

from the dirtiest coal plants in our nation and ensure new ones meet a higher threshold. The 

technoiogies to meet the new standards are readily avaiiable. Companies are already taking 

advantage of this — this action mereiy ensures that this progress continues. 

In Alexandria, I don't know a single person who didn't rejoice when a large coal-buming piant - a 

plant that sent dangerous amounts of inercury into the air in addition to heat trapping CO2 - was 

finally retired. 

But it hasn't been enough. The federal government MUST urgently intervene in part because states like 

mine simply have not done nearly enough to bring CO2 emissions down on their own. 

We already limit arsenic, lead, soot and other pollution from power plants. The authority to limit dangerous 

carbon emissions has been upheld by the Supreme Court. It's now time for action. For ourselves, for the 

health of the planet and for the next generation. 

Thank you. 

1) National Resources Defense Council
- - Johnstown Redevelopment Authority 

MSGR. RAYMOND BALTA 

Chairman 

4th Floor, Public Safety Bldg. 

401 Washington Street 

Johnstown, Pennsylvania 15901 

RONALD W. REPAK 

Executive Director 

RECEIVED 

EPA REGION Ill 

Mr. John Lovell 

U.S. EPA Region III 

1650 Arch St. 

Johnstown, PA 19103-2029 

RE: Pretreatment Program 

NPDES No. PA0026034 

Dear Mr. Lovell: 

814-535-6564 

Fax: 814-535-6567 

December 19, 2012 

DEC 2 6 2012 

MPO[S PERMITS BRAN 

(3WP41) CH 

Thank you for your letter of December 6, 2012, and your comments regarding the Authority's 

2011 annual pretreatment report. We are pleased that our overall rating for 2011 (87) is higher 

than the average received by all POTW's in 2010. (85.9) 

In your letter, you referenced an enclosed Johnstown Zinc Data Spreadsheet, but it was not 

attached with your submittal. Can you please provide a copy of this at your earliest 

convenience? We acknowledge that zinc exceedences occur at the plant, although not nearly 

to the level of previous excursions, and only occurring in the influent. (Please see attached 

spreadsheet.) We will prepare a sampling/evaluation plan for identifying the causes of these 

slug loads, incorporating your recommended steps. 

You stated in your letter that Measure 5 (NPDES Violations) is listed in Category 3 for Fecal 

Coliform, TSS, and CBOD. Know that the treatment plant no longer accepts gas drilling 

waste, and we anticipate that the number of violations will decrease. 

In accordance with your letter and the new NPDES permit, we will conduct a reevaluation of 

local limits and provide a sampling plan and list of pollutants for evaluation. We respectfully 

request an extension of one month, or until February 12, 2013, to submit the required 

information. 

Enclosure 

DW:lw 

DEP, NPDES Permit, Lovell 12-19-12.doc 

Sincerely, 

~w~ 

Deborah Walter 

Pretreatment Coordinator
# column definitions

# Irene HWMs

# image1.emf
#### Charles Daniel DEARING, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1380.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 9, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1977.

Koeppel, Stark *&*Newmark and Nelson C. Keshen, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Margarita Esquiroz, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John Moppert, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant Charles Dearing, Jr. appeals a criminal conviction entered upon a jury verdict for unlawful possession of explosives without a permit [Sections 552.101, 552.22. Florida Statutes (1975)] in the Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida. He contends on appeal that the trial court erred in certain of its instructions to the jury in the denial of defense motions to suppress and dismiss, and in a ruling on the waiver of defendant’s right to counsel and to remain silent. We affirm based on the following authorities: *Carroll v. United States,*267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925) adopted by Section 933.-19, Florida Statutes (1975); *State ex rel. Butler v. Cullen,*253 So.2d 861 (Fla.1971); *Ponder v. State,*323 So.2d 296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); *State v. Stanzione,*315 So.2d 500 (Fla 4th DCA 1975); *King v. State,*303 So.2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); *Yost*v. *State,*243 So.2d 469, 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
#### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. IRVING TRUST CO.

No. 178.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 11, 1937.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Atty. Gen. (Robert P. Beyer, of New York City, of counsel), for the People of State of New York.

Burnstine, Geist & Netter, of New York City, Manuel Maxwell and George E. Netter, both of New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the State of New York from an order in equity disallowing its claim for franchise taxes against a receiver. On February 4, 1932, a conservation bill of the usual form was filed against the defendant, Amalgamated Laundries, Inc., a New York corporation, and a receiver was appointed, who was made permanent on February 27th. He continued to conduct the corporate business until July 15th, when he sold the assets under a decree, for a consideration partly in cash and partly in a purchase-money mortgage taken in his own name, which was all paid by March 26, 1934. The State asserts a claim for corporate' franchise taxes assessed for the two years beginning November 1, 1932, and 1933, on the theory that during those years the receiver made use of the defendant’s franchise, reserving it, so to speak, for possible use in case he had to take back the property on foreclosure. This the judge denied, and the State appealed. «

The underlying principle in such cases is stated by Cardozo, J., in Michigan v. Michigan Trust Co., 286 U.S. 334, 344, 52 S.Ct. 512, 515, 76 L.Ed. 1136, as follows: “Taxes owing to the government, whether due at the beginning of a receivership or subsequently accruing, are the price that business has to pay for protection and security.” These words were spoken of taxes upon a franchise “to do,” rather than “to be”; but for our purpose it makes no difference which the tax at bar may be. The defendant had ceased to be of any importance to the creditors; the receiver had no further use for it and nothing more to do than distribute the proceeds of the sale. If the mortgage had been taken in the corporation’s name, perhaps it would have been proper to treat the franchise taxes as an expense of continued admin*296istration until the mortgage was paid. Upon a foreclosure the mortgagee might become the purchaser and it would-be necessary to pay the franchise taxes that had meanwhile accrued if it was to do any business with the re-acquired assets. But the receiver was himself the mortgagee, and it is incredible that he should have had the defendant take title if he had had to foreclose. The defendant would still be liable for the debts; the sale did not discharge them; nothing could do so but bankruptcy. The corporation had become a worthless derelict, in whose preservation the creditors could have no possible interest.

Order affirmed.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

AR-05 Devil's Den West Bridge Replacement & 

Roadway Resurfacing

U.S. Forest Service - Ozark 

National Forest

Arkansas State 

Highway & 

Transportation 

Department

Crawford & 

Washington 2016

AR-06 Shady Lake Entrance Road Roadway Reconstruction U.S. Forest Service - 

Oauchita National Forest Polk County Polk 2016

AR-09 Public Access & Linkage to Hot 

Springs National Park

Bicycle & Pedestrian 

Improvements

National Park Service - Hot 

Springs National Park

City of Hot 

Springs Garland 2017

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Arkansas Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Arkansas FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Arkansas Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2018

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The Arkansas PDC does not have a firm date for the next 

Call for Projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. 

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 571-

434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                                                                        |                                      |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Date:                August 14, 2008 | By:                                                               | /s/                JEAN-CHRISTOPHE HADORN |
|                                 | Jean-Christophe                HadornChief                Executive Officer |
|                                 |                                                                        |
|                                 |                                                                        |

----
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

KY-01 KY 787 within Clarks River 

National Wildlife Refuge

Bridge/culvert 

installation and 

Parking area 

construction

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - 

Clarks River National 

Wildlife Refuge

Kentucky 

Transportation 

Cabinet

McCracken

KY-02

Land Between the Lakes Road 

Program

Resurfacing and 

Maintenance 

Repairs

U.S. Forest Service - Land 

Between the Lakes 

National Recreation Area

Kentucky 

Transportation 

Cabinet

Lyon and 

Trigg

KY-03

 Three Roads at Clarks River 

National Wildlife Refuge

Resurfacing and 

Parking lot 

construction

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - 

Clarks River National 

Wildlife Refuge

Marshall County 

Road Department Marshall

KY-04 Yahoo Falls Road 

Improvement

Resurfacing and 

Maintenance 

Repairs

U.S. Forest Service - Daniel 

Boone National Forest & 

National Park Service- Big 

South Fork National River & 

Recreation Area

McCreary County McCreary

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Kentucky Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its initial, multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Kentucky FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Kentucky Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2013-2014

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. Funding for these projects is not guaranteed. Funding 

beyond 2014 is dependent on reauthorization of the Access Program by Congress. The Kentucky PDC does not have a firm date for the next call 

for projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. If you have any questions please contact David Payne, 

Access Program Manager, at 571-434-1543 or email at David.Payne@dot.gov.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 55203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52

[MN54-01-7279b; FRL-5913-2]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Minnesota

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
proposes full approval of Minnesota's 1993 carbon monoxide (CO) 
emission inventory. The inventory was submitted by the State of 
Minnesota to satisfy a certain Federal requirement that those States 
containing CO nonattainment areas (NAA's) classified moderate and 
serious to submit a revised emission inventory (i.e., from the 1990 
base year inventory) at the end of each 3 year period thereafter, until 
the area is redesignated to attainment, of actual CO season emissions 
from all sources in accordance with EPA guidance. In the final rules 
section of this Federal Register, the EPA is approving these actions as 
a direct final rule without prior proposal because EPA views these 
actions as noncontroversial and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to that direct 
final rule, no further activity is contemplated in relation to this 
proposed rule. If EPA receives substantive adverse comments which have 
not already been responded to, the direct final rule will be withdrawn 
and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent 
final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on 
this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received on or before 
November 24, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Carlton T. Nash, Chief, Regulation 
Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), United States 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60604. Copies of the material submitted by the 
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency may be examined during normal 
business hours at the same location.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten at (312) 886-6031.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule published in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: October 9, 1997.
David A. Ullrich,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-28140 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00251-CR

Jerome Yancey, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 460TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-DC-19-300876, THE HONORABLE SELENA ALVARENGA, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was originally due September 27, 2023. To date, the brief has 

not been tendered for filing and is overdue. On October 11, 2023, this Court sent a notice to 

appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a failure to file a satisfactory 

response by October 23, 2023, would result in the referral of this case to the trial court for a 

hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct 

a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether 

counsel has abandoned this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall make 

appropriate written findings and recommendations. See id. R. 38.8(b)(2), (3). If necessary, the 

court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this appeal. 

Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate 
2

supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings and orders—to be prepared 

and forwarded to this Court no later than April 15, 2024. See id. R. 38.8(b)(3). We dismiss the 

State’s motion to abate as moot.

It is so ordered March 13, 2024.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis

Abated and Remanded

Filed: March 13, 2024

Do Not Publish