alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-55-001]


Questar Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

October 17, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 14, 1997, Questar Pipeline Company, 
(Questar) tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Eighth Revised Sheet No. 5A and 
Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 6A, to be effective October 1, 1997.
    Questar states that these tariff sheets are filed in compliance 
with the September 29, 1997, Order of the Director Accepting, Rejecting 
and Allowing Withdrawal of Tariff Sheets, in Docket No. TM98-1-55.
    Questar states further that copies of this filing were served upon 
its customers, the Public Service Commission of Utah and the Wyoming 
Public Service Commission.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests should 
be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28057 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT
32.1





WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350











The
undersigned, Richard K. Matros, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer), of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, hereby certifies that:





(i)   the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of the Company
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      March 4, 2010
            /s/ Richard K.
      MatrosRichard
      K. Matros
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.3

                            APPLIEDTHEORY CORPORATION

                  CALCULATION OF LOSS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED) (1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                               JUNE 30, 1999
                                                                               -------------
<S>                                                                           <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
       Shares outstanding at beginning of period                                 15,094,336
       Weighted average shares issued during six months
       ended June 30, 1999 (6,053,566 shares)                                     2,600,745
                                                                                ------------
                                                                                 17,695,081
                                                                                ============

Net loss                                                                        $(4,025,000)
                                                                                ============

Loss per share attributable to common stockholders                              $     (0.23)
                                                                                ============
</TABLE>





(1)  For a discussion of loss per share, see Note B of the Notes to the
     Financial Statements provided in Part I, Item 1 of our Form 10-Q for the
     period ended June 30, 1999.
259 La. 70

#### PORT ARTHUR TOWING COMPANY v. Bertin Erwin LEVEQUE et al.

No. 51510.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 24, 1971.

In re: Port Arthur Towing Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 247 So.2d S9S.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct insofar as the issues presented by the application for writs are concerned.
Spotlight

Department of Homeland Security

Office of Inspector General January 2012 OIG-12-25

Why This Matters

U.S. Customs and Border

Protection (CBP) seaport threat

assessments have identified the CBP's Management Controls over

potential for terrorist exploitation,

smuggling, and internal Bonded Facilities

conspiracies at bonded facilities.

CBP and U.S. Immigration and

Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Joint

Fraud Investigative Strike Teams What We Determined

conducted unannounced CBP is responsible for cargo security, including the accountability of the transfer to and investigations of bonded facilities storage of cargo at privately owned and operated bonded facilities. We reviewed the resulting in the detention of more effectiveness of CBP management controls over background checks at 41 bonded facilities at than 350 undocumented workers 5 seaports. CBP does not have effective management controls to ensure that bonded facility and workers with outstanding arrest employees do not pose a security risk at the bonded facilities. warrants. This points to the need

for additional vetting of bonded CBP has not issued national requirements for background checks on employees of bonded facility employees to ensure that facilities and does not ensure port directors have management controls over background they do not pose a risk to the port, checks at bonded facilities. As a result, background checks are inconsistent and often the cargo or other employees. ineffective. This may put bonded facilities at greater risk for terrorist exploitation,

smuggling, and internal conspiracies. DHS Response

CBP concurred with all of the

report’s recommendations and

intends to use the Global

Enrollment System to standardize

and improve vetting of bonded

facility employees.

CBP responded that the What We Recommend

safeguarding of material in bonded

warehouses is primarily a revenue Department of Homeland Security, Cargo Control Branch Chief, CBP:

function and noted that it takes a

number of actions to screen 1) Establish and implement nationwide standardized policies and procedures for

merchandise for security threats conducting background checks at bonded facilities, including how CBP plans to coordinate

prior to its movement into a bonded with ICE concerning the roles and responsibilities of all parties involved.

facility.

2) Provide port directors with a list of criminal offenses that disqualify a job applicant from

While CBP has a layered cargo employment at a bonded facility.

security approach and mitigates

some risks before the cargo arrives 3) Implement a process to ensure that CBP receives and retains background check records,

at a bonded facility, OIG and GAO including employee lists and results of background checks.

have noted several concerns with

CBP’s screening prior to arrival at 4) Expand compliance reviews to include bonded facility employee background check results

a bonded facility. and updates, and reconcile compliance review results with CBP bonded facility file

information.

For Further Information:

Contact our Office of Public Affairs at

(202)254-4100, or email us at

DHS-OIG.OfficePublicAffairs@dhs.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                      <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1999             JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                           3,815                     275
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,906                  15,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                       537                     318
<INVENTORY>                                     11,717                   8,521
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,257                  24,126
<PP&E>                                          52,884                  50,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,945                  29,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,676                 121,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,901                  12,400
<BONDS>                                        100,000                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,887                 108,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,676                 121,444
<SALES>                                         50,550                  52,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                           30,923                  33,054
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,775                  82,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (29)                      59
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    61                      26
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,317                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,490                (29,493)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,482                   4,461
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,008                (33,954)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,008                (33,954)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3083 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3083

  To reallocate funding originally appropriated for Gaza to grants to 
      Israel for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 19, 2023

   Mr. Hagerty (for himself, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. 
     Tillis, Mrs. Britt, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Hawley, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. 
   Tuberville, Mr. Scott of Florida, and Mr. Wicker) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reallocate funding originally appropriated for Gaza to grants to 
      Israel for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Resupply for Iron Dome Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR IRON DOME SHORT-RANGE ROCKET DEFENSE SYSTEM.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including section 1659 
of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2023 (Public Law 117-263) and sections 482(b) and 531(e) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291a(b) and 2346(e)), the 
President shall transfer all unexpended balances of appropriations made 
available for assistance to Gaza--
            (1) to the Department of Defense, to be available for 
        grants to Israel for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense 
        system; or
            (2) to the Foreign Military Financing Program authorized 
        under section 23 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
        2763), to be available for grants to Israel for the Iron Dome 
        short-range rocket defense system.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iParty Corp (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2003, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersignedChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

 

(1)       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 13, 2003 | /s/ Sal  Perisano                                  |   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Sal Perisano                                       |
|                     | Chairman of  the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
No. D-2234.

#### In re Disbarment of Little.

Frank Edward Little, of Mercer, Pa., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54465-54466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-958-1430-01; GP8-0012 ; OR-53642]


Notice of Public Meeting; Proposed Protective Withdrawal for 
Leslie Gulch Area of Critical Environmental Concern; Oregon

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the schedule and agenda for a 
forthcoming public meeting that will provide an opportunity for public 
involvement regarding the Department of Interior, Bureau of Land 
Management's application for protective withdrawal for the Leslie Gulch 
Area of Critical Environmental Concern in eastern Malheur County.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 18, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Holsheimer, BLM Vale District 
Office, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, Oregon 97918, 541-473-3144.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that a public meeting 
will be held to provide an opportunity for public comment regarding the 
application by the Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management 
for a 20-year protective withdrawal as to 12,426.43 acres of public 
lands in eastern Malheur County, Oregon.
    The meeting will begin at 7 p.m., Tuesday, November 18, 1997, at 
the Bureau of Land Management, Vale District Office, 100 E. Oregon 
Street, Vale, Oregon. The agenda will include: (1) An information 
briefing by the Bureau of Land Management; (2) oral statements by 
interested parties addressing the proposed withdrawal; and (3) a 
question and answer period. Written comments will be accepted or can be 
mailed to the Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/Washington State 
Office, P.O. Box 2965, Portland, Oregon 97208. Only comments concerning 
the proposed protective withdrawal of 12,426.43 acres in Malheur 
County, Oregon, will be accepted.
    The meeting is open to the public. Interested parties may make oral

[[Page 54466]]

statements at the meeting and may file written statements with the 
Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/Washington State Office no later than 
December 19, 1997. At this informational meeting, oral statements 
should be limited to five minutes per party. All statements received 
will be considered by the Bureau of Land Management before any 
recommendation concerning the proposed mineral withdrawal is submitted 
to the Secretary of Interior for final action under the authority of 
Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 
U.S.C. 1714).

    Dated: October 7, 1997.
Robert D. DeViney, Jr.,
Chief, Branch of Realty and Records Services.
[FR Doc. 97-27714 Filed 10-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
PUBLIC LAW 111–333—DEC. 22, 2010 124 STAT. 3581 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1405: 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 111–141 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

May 7, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 14, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–333 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To redesignate the Longfellow National Historic Site, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Longfellow House-Washington’s Headquarters National Historic Site’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Longfellow House-Washington’s 

Headquarters National Historic Site Designation Act’’. 

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF LONGFELLOW NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE, 

MASSACHUSETTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Longfellow National Historic Site in 

Cambridge, Massachusetts, shall be known and designated as 

‘‘Longfellow House-Washington’s Headquarters National Historic 

Site’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Longfellow National Historic Site shall be considered to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Longfellow House-Washington’s Headquarters National Historic Site’’. 

Approved December 22, 2010. 

Longfellow 

HouseWashington’s 

Headquarters 

National 

Historic Site 

Designation Act. 

16 USC 461 note. 

Dec. 22, 2010 

[S. 1405] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
```

[House Document 112-94]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

112th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 112-94

 
  NOTIFICATION OF INTENTION TO SUSPEND DESIGNATION OF ARGENTINA AS A 
    BENEFICIARY DEVELOPING COUNTRY UNDER THE GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF 
                       PREFERENCES (GSP) PROGRAM

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                  THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

NOTIFICATION OF THE INTENTION TO TERMINATE THE DESIGNATION OF ARGENTINA 
  AS A BENEFICIARY DEVELOPING COUNTRY UNDER THE GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF 
                           PREFERENCES (GSP)

   March 26, 2012.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed
To the Congress of the United States:
    In accordance with section 502(f)(2) of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (the ``1974 Act'') (19 U.S.C. 2462(f)(2)), I 
am providing notification of my intent to suspend designation 
of Argentina as a beneficiary developing country under the 
Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program. Section 
502(b)(2)(E) of the 1974 Act (19 U.S.C. 2462(b)(2)(E)) provides 
that the President shall not designate any country a 
beneficiary developing country under the GSP if such country 
fails to act in good faith in enforcing arbitral awards in 
favor of U.S.-owned companies. Section 502(d)(2) of the 1974 
Act (19 U.S.C. 2462(d)(2)) provides that, after complying with 
the requirements of section 502(f)(2) of the 1974 Act (19 
U.S.C. 2462(f)(2)), the President shall withdraw or suspend the 
designation of any country as a beneficiary developing country 
if, after such designation, the President determines that as 
the result of changed circumstances such country would be 
barred from designation as a beneficiary developing country 
under section 502(b)(2) of the 1974 Act.
    Pursuant to section 502(d) of the 1974 Act, having 
considered the factors set forth in section 502(b)(2)(E), I 
have determined that it is appropriate to suspend Argentina's 
designation as a beneficiary country under the GSP program 
because it has not acted in good faith in enforcing arbitral 
awards in favor of U.S.-owned companies.
                                                      Barack Obama.
    The White House, March 26, 2012.

                                  

```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2560]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 1-9307]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Gundle/SLT Environmental, Inc., Common Stock, $0.01 
Par Value)

January 28, 1997.
    Gundle/SLT Environmental, Inc. (``Company'') has filed an 
application with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to 
withdraw the above specified security (``Security'') from listing and 
registration on the American Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, it has complied with Rule 18 of the Amex 
by filing with such Exchange a certified copy of preambles and 
resolutions adopted by the Company's Board of Directors authorizing the 
withdrawal of its security from listing on the Amex and by setting 
forth in detail to such Exchange the reasons for such proposed 
withdrawal, and the facts in support thereof. The Security of the 
Company has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'') 
as of December 10, 1996. In making the decision to withdraw the 
Security from listing on the Amex, the Company considered the 
sufficient liquidity provided by its listing on the NYSE and the 
corresponding reduction in benefits provided by the costs associated 
with maintaining the Amex listing.
    Any interested person may, on or before February 19, 1997, submit 
by letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon 
whether the application has been made in accordance with the rules of 
the exchanges and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the 
Commission for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on 
the information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2560 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M