5496 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 1997 / Notices

Advisory Committee on Reactor

Safeguards Subcommittee Meeting on

Probabilistic Risk Assessment; Notice

of Meeting

The ACRS Subcommittee on

Probabilistic Risk Assessment will hold

a meeting on February 20 and 21, 1997,

Room T–2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Maryland.

The entire meeting will be open to

public attendance.

The agenda for the subject meeting

shall be as follows:

Thursday, February 20, 1997—8:30 a.m.

until the conclusion of business

Friday, February 21, 1997—8:30 a.m.

until the conclusion of business

The Subcommittee will continue its

discussion of the NRC staff’s approach

to codify risk-informed, performancebased regulation through development

of Standard Review Plan (SRP) sections

and associated regulatory guides. The

purpose of this meeting is to gather

information, analyze relevant issues and

facts, and to formulate proposed

positions and actions, as appropriate,

for deliberation by the full Committee.

Oral statements may be presented by

members of the public with the

concurrence of the Subcommittee

Chairman; written statements will be

accepted and made available to the

Committee. Electronic recordings will

be permitted only during those portions

of the meeting that are open to the

public, and questions may be asked only

by members of the Subcommittee, its

consultants, and staff. Persons desiring

to make oral statements should notify

the cognizant ACRS staff engineer

named below five days prior to the

meeting, if possible, so that appropriate

arrangements can be made.

During the initial portion of the

meeting, the Subcommittee, along with

any of its consultants who may be

present, may exchange preliminary

views regarding matters to be

considered during the balance of the

meeting.

The Subcommittee will then hear

presentations by and hold discussions

with representatives of the NRC staff, its

consultants, and other interested

persons regarding this review.

Further information regarding topics

to be discussed, whether the meeting

has been cancelled or rescheduled, the

Chairman’s ruling on requests for the

opportunity to present oral statements

and the time allotted therefor can be

obtained by contacting the cognizant

ACRS staff engineer, Mr. Michael T.

Markley (telephone 301/415–6885)

between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EST).

Persons planning to attend this meeting

are urged to contact the above named

individual one or two working days

prior to the meeting to be advised of any

potential changes to the agenda, etc.,

that may have occurred.

Dated: January 30, 1997.

Sam Duraiswamy,

Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.

[FR Doc. 97–2804 Filed 2–4–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

[Docket No. A97–9]

Eddyville, Nebraska 68834 (Ruth

Yentes, et al., Petitioners); Notice and

Order Accepting Appeal and

Establishing Procedural Schedule

Under 39 U.S.C. § 404(b)(5)

January 30, 1997.

Before Commissioners: Edward J.

Gleiman, Chairman; H. Edward Quick,

Jr., Vice-Chairman; George W. Haley;

W.H. ‘‘Trey’’ LeBlanc III.

Docket Number: A97–9.

Name of Affected Post Office:

Eddyville, Nebraska 68834.

Name(s) of Petitioner(s): Ruth Yentes,

et al.

Type of Determination: Consolidation.

Date of Filing of Appeal Papers:

January 27, 1997.

Categories of Issues Apparently

Raised:

1. Effect on the community [39 U.S.C.

§ 404(b)(2)(A)].

2. Effect on postal services [39 U.S.C.

§ 404(b)(2)(C)].

After the Postal Service files the

administrative record and the

Commission reviews it, the Commission

may find that there are more legal issues

than those set forth above. Or, the

Commission may find that the Postal

Service’s determination disposes of one

or more of those issues.

The Postal Reorganization Act

requires that the Commission issue its

decision within 120 days from the date

this appeal was filed (39 U.S.C. § 404

(b)(5)). In the interest of expedition, in

light of the 120-day decision schedule,

the Commission may request the Postal

Service to submit memoranda of law on

any appropriate issue. If requested, such

memoranda will be due 20 days from

the issuance of the request and the

Postal Service shall serve a copy of its

memoranda on the petitioners. The

Postal Service may incorporate by

reference in its briefs or motions, any

arguments presented in memoranda it

previously filed in this docket. If

necessary, the Commission also may ask

petitioners or the Postal Service for

more information.

The Commission Orders

(a) The Postal Service shall file the

record in this appeal by February 11,

1997.

(b) The Secretary of the Postal Rate

Commission shall publish this Notice

and Order and Procedural Schedule in

the Federal Register.

By the Commission.

Margaret P. Crenshaw,

Secretary.

APPENDIX

January 27, 1997 ................ Filing of Appeal letter.

January 30, 1997 ................ Commission Notice and Order of Filing of Appeal.

February 20, 1997 ............... Last day of filing of petitions to intervene [see 39 CFR § 3001.111(b)]

March 3, 1997 ..................... Petitioners’ Participant Statement or Initial Brief [see 39 CFR § 3001.115 (a) and (b)]

March 24, 1997 ................... Postal Service’s Answering Brief [see 39 CFR § 3001.115(c)]

April 8, 1997 ........................ Petitioners’ Reply Brief should Petitioner choose to file one [see 39 CFR § 3001.115(d)]

April 15, 1997 Deadline for motions by any party requesting oral argument. The Commission will schedule oral argument only

when it is a necessary addition to the written filings [see 39 CFR § 3001.116]

May 27, 1997 Expiration of the Commission’s 120-day decisional schedule [see 39 U.S.C. § 404(b)(5)]
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 1997 / Notices 5497

[FR Doc. 97–2786 Filed 2–4–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P

[Docket No. A97–10]

Hertel, Wisconsin 54845 (Thomas M.

Mrozik, Petitioner); Notice and Order

Accepting Appeal and Establishing

Procedural Schedule Under 39 U.S.C.

404(b)(5)

January 30, 1997.

Before Commissioners: Edward J.

Gleiman, Chairman; H. Edward Quick,

Jr., Vice-Chairman; George W. Haley;

W.H. ‘‘Trey’’ LeBlanc III.

Docket Number: A97–10.

Name of Affected Post Office: Hertel,

Wisconsin 54845.

Name(s) of Petitioner(s): Thomas M.

Mrozik.

Type of Determination: Consolidation.

Date of Filing of Appeal Papers:

January 28, 1997.

Categories of Issues Apparently

Raised:

1. Effect on the community [39 U.S.C.

§ 404(b)(2)(A)].

2. Effect on postal services [39 U.S.C.

§ 404(b)(2)(C)].

After the Postal Service files the

administrative record and the

Commission reviews it, the Commission

may find that there are more legal issues

than those set forth above. Or, the

Commission may find that the Postal

Service’s determination disposes of one

or more of those issues.

The Postal Reorganization Act

requires that the Commission issue its

decision within 120 days from the date

this appeal was filed (39 U.S.C. § 404

(b)(5)). In the interest of expedition, in

light of the 120-day decision schedule,

the Commission may request the Postal

Service to submit memoranda of law on

any appropriate issue. If requested, such

memoranda will be due 20 days from

the issuance of the request and the

Postal Service shall serve a copy of its

memoranda on the petitioners. The

Postal Service may incorporate by

reference in its briefs or motions, any

arguments presented in memoranda it

previously filed in this docket. If

necessary, the Commission also may ask

petitioners or the Postal Service for

more information.

The Commission Orders

(a) The Postal Service shall file the

record in this appeal by February 12,

1997.

(b) The Secretary of the Postal Rate

Commission shall publish this Notice

and Order and Procedural Schedule in

the Federal Register.

By the Commission.

Margaret P. Crenshaw,

Secretary.

APPENDIX

January 28, 1997 ................ Filing of Appeal letter.

January 30, 1997 ................ Commission Notice and Order of Filing of Appeal.

February 21, 1997 ............... Last day of filing of petitions to intervene [see 39 CFR § 3001.111(b)].

March 4, 1997 ..................... Petitioner’s Participant Statement or Initial Brief [see 39 CFR § 3001.115(a) and (b)].

March 24, 1997 ................... Postal Service’s Answering Brief [see 39 CFR § 3001.115(c)].

April 8, 1997 ........................ Petitioner’s Reply Brief should Petitioner choose to file one [see 39 CFR § 3001.115(d)].

April 15, 1997 ...................... Deadline for motions by any party requesting oral argument. The Commission will schedule oral argument only

when it is a necessary addition to the written filings [see 39 CFR § 3001.116].

May 28, 1997 ...................... Expiration of the Commission’s 120-day decisional schedule [see 39 U.S.C. § 404(b)(5)].

[FR Doc. 97–2787 Filed 2–4–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Rel. No. IC–22483; File No. 812–10484]

Anchor Pathway Fund, et al.

January 29, 1997.

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange

Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’ or the

‘‘Commission’’).

ACTION: Notice of application for

exemptions under the Investment

Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘1940 Act’’).

APPLICANTS: Anchor Pathway Fund

(‘‘APT’’) and SunAmerica Series Trust

(‘‘SST’’).

RELEVANT 1940 ACT SECTIONS: Order

requested pursuant to Section 10(e)(3) of

the 1940 Act suspending the operation

of Section 10(a) of the 1940 Act.

SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants

seeks an order, pursuant to Section

10(e)(3) of the 1940 Act, extending the

sixty-day period provided for by Section

10(e)(2) of the 1940 Act to March 21,

1997, in order to provide time for the

identification, nomination and election

of additional trustees. Applicants

further request that the order grant

retroactive relief for the period from

January 21, 1997, the expiration date of

the initial sixty-day period, to the date

on which the order is issued.

FILING DATE: The application was filed

on January 9, 1997.

HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An

order granting the application will be

issued unless the Commission orders a

hearing. Interested persons may request

a hearing on this application by writing

to the Secretary of the SEC and serving.

Applicants with a copy of the request,

in person or by mail. Hearing requests

must be received by the Commission by

5:30 p.m., on February 24, 1997, and

accompanied by proof of service on the

Applicants in the form of an affidavit or,

for lawyers, a certificate of service.

Hearing requests should state the nature

of the requester’s interest, the reason for

the request and the issues contested.

Persons may request notification of the

date of a hearing by writing to the

Secretary of the SEC.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC. 450 Fifth

Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.

Applicants, c/o Joan E. Boros, Esq.,

Katten, Muchin & Zavis, 1025 Thomas

Jefferson Street, N.W., East Lobby, Suite

700, Washington, D.C. 20007–5201, or

Robert M. Zakem, Esq., SunAmerica

Asset Management Corp., The SunAmerica Center, 733 Third Avenue,

New York, NY 10017–3204.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Megan L. Dunphy, Staff Attorney, or

Patrice M. Pitts, Branch Chief, Office of

Insurance Products, Division of

Investment Management, at (202) 942–

0670.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following

is a summary of the application. The

complete application is available for a

fee from the Public Reference Branch of

the SEC.

Applicant’s Representations

1. APT and SST (collectively, the

‘‘Trusts’’) each are open-end, series type

management investment companies

organized as Massachusetts business

trusts. APT and SST are registered

under the 1940 Act, and their shares are

registered under the Securities Act of

1933, as amended.

2. The Boards of Trustees of APT and

SST (collectively, the ‘‘Boards’’) are

identical in composition. Before