alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 19

- 00503

- CV CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C. , Chesapeake Operating, L.L.C., Jamestown Resources, L.L.C., and OOGC American LLC, Appellants

v. 7K INVESTMENTS, LTD. , et al

. , Appellees From the 218th Judicial District Court , La Salle County, Texas Trial Court No. 16

- 03

- 00030

- CVL Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr. , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice Delivered and File d: June 9, 2021
VACATED AND REMANDED On June 29, 2020, appellants filed a notice with this court stating appellants we re in bankruptcy. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 8. T his appeal and all time periods were accordingly stayed from the date the bankruptcy petition was filed. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 8.2. T his court subsequently issued an order abating this appeal. For administrative purposes, this case was treated as a closed case, unless and until it is reinstated in accordance with Rule 8.3 of the Texas Rules of Appell ate Procedure.04

- 19

- 00503

- CV

- 2

- On May 26, 2021, the parties filed a “Joint Motion to Vacate Judgment and Remand Pursuant to Settlement” moving this court to set aside the district court’s “Corrected Final Judgment” without regard to the merits and remand the case to the district court to dismiss the claims pursuant to the parties’ settlement. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). We order this appeal REINSTATE D , and the motion is GRAN TED . We VACATE the district court’s “Corrected Final Judgment” without regard to its merits and REMAND this case to the district court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. See id. Because the motion does not indic ate that the parties agreed otherwise, costs are taxed against the appellant. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
#### FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN CALLICOON, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 150.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 1, 1937.

Charles De La Vergne, of Kingston, N. Y., for petitioner.

Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Berryman Green, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed.
#### Junior Dan SOUTHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-746.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 28, 1977.

Lawrence D. Martin of Vega, Brown & Nichols, P.A., Naples, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

*661PER CURIAM.

The appellant pled guilty to a charge of possession of more than five grams of marijuana. He was later sentenced to five years in prison. His only assignment of error is directed to the court’s refusal to grant his motion to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing. On this record we do not believe that error was committed in refusing the appellant the right to withdraw his plea.

While his appeal was in progress, the appellant brought to our attention that his only previous felony conviction had just been set aside by the Circuit Court of Dade County on July 26, 1977, under the authority of *Gideon v. Wainwright,*372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). In view of the fact that the judge specifically stated that one of the reasons for the severity of appellant’s sentence in the instant case was the fact of his prior felony conviction, appellant will have to be resentenced. *Wolfe v. State,*323 So.2d 680 (Fla.2d DCA 1975). Since the state has conceded the invalidity of appellant’s Dade County conviction, we see no purpose in requiring a hearing under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

The judgment is affirmed. The sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing at which the appellant should be present. In order to spare the sentencing judge the awkward task of now having to decide what appellant’s sentence ought to be without the felony conviction on his record, we suggest that appellant be resen-tenced before another judge.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.
(A) Eastern Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle

1-65.11
US.Department Highway Division Sterling, VA 20166-65:

of Transportation

Federal Highway
Administration

MAY -9 2013 ‘In Reply Refer to: HFPP-15

Mr. Shailen Bhatt

Secretary

Delaware Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 778

Dover, DE 19903

Subject: _MAP-21 Access Program Programming Decisions Committee Members
Dear Mr. Bhatt:

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141,
includes the establishment of the new Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP). This new
program will be administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Federal
Lands Highway. Delaware is served by the Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD)
office in Sterling, Virginia.

A key requirement for implementing the FLAP is to coordinate the establishment of a three
member Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for programming the FLAP
funds allocated to each state. Each state level PDC consists of a representative from the Federal
Lands Highway Division office, the State Department of Transportation, and an organization or
entity that is suited to represent the local entities responsible for building, operating, or
maintaining transportation facilities that are located on, are adjacent to, or provide access to
Federal lands. Our program managers have coordinated with your department and have
identified the following positions that will fulfill the PDC requirement:

FLAP Program Manager, FHWA, EFLHD
Planning Director, Delaware Department of Transportation
Executive Director, Dover/Kent Metropolitan Planning Organization


Additional information on the implementation of FLAP can be found on the EFLHD MAP-21
website at http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/federal-lands-access.aspx. If you have any
questions, please contact Mr. David Payne at 571-434-1543 David.Payne@dot.gov, or myself at
703-404-6276 or Karen.Schmidt@dot.gov.

Sincerely yours,

Cee

& Karen A. Schmidt
Director, Office of Program Administration

cc:

Mr. Rich Vetter, Executive Director, Dover/Kent Metropolitan Planning Organization, Dover,
DE

Mr. Drew Boyce, Planning Director, Delaware Department of Transportation, Dover, DE
Ms. Mary Ridgeway, Division Administrator, FHWA, Delaware Division Office, Dover, DE
#### Eddie FULLER, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-109.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 27, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit
10.2





iParty
Corp.





WRITTEN
SUMMARY OF RENEWED ONE-YEAR PART-TIME CONSULTING ARRANGEMENT WITH MR.
VASSALLUZZO





May
27, 2009











iParty
Corp. shall renew its engagement of Joseph Vassalluzzo to provide consulting
services on a part-time basis over a one-year period beginning on May 27, 2009
(the date of termination of the prior year's arrangement) to iParty's senior
management, in particular iParty's Chairman and CEO, Sal Perisano, with respect
to various retail, operational, strategic, real estate and store location
issues, as may from time to time be necessary and appropriate. Such services
shall on occasion require Mr. Vassalluzzo's presence at iParty's corporate
headquarters in Dedham, Massachusetts and/or current or proposed store location
sites, principally in New England and Florida. On or before the end of the
one-year period commencing on May 27, 2009, iParty Corp. shall pay Mr.
Vassalluzzo one or more payments not to exceed $60,000 cash for services
rendered over the one-year period beginning on May 27, 2009, with such services
to be earned at a rate of $5,000 per month.
#### Andrew THOMPSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-80.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 15, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
~-... -------

@ 

'D. ~ 

' 

~'''£·'"'" t\w;~:.;d fc.r lilc L2>L.:1 n l·kr!n>; 

Av;.;;J i._w_ ,-\cL1~iLi:~lf'.ili;_:,H 

! .;\ \"!:i;;t'm l'i : r.: 

APR l 6 2015 

HEARING DOCI<ET 

;r1 r~p;; ':'"' :d,·.Jr ;--ir;;!! -~~(<fif•: ,_,f [·'tup::-o\<:i!: ( 1ni l'~·n;d;y_ -l <.:-!tl~ 1~1 pr~r.\.::.:1~ :t' i;~.!k,it'~'~ l-:.. 'I') (.)Jed. -lL,:k b:-~.:-.· l'k 

!~H:-r''tl~?d feiriJ:,::ffl['~l~ h.::k1v.·· 

ll'a<:i>:\:;. -"llbll:IH ~~~.;- ;F'f!.<,JU!!': iiJ 1!1<.: f'W_l~i'"'c.>J 1.i1P 

;;t[~ (!,_: i:>~d.:x_[ !1 t:k;d ,1f':1('itDt 

2 1-·~-JlH.:;.!.;,;; l;;<nniil in ;JU,tJit.latlc~ w!;h ~•ci,--:] U .. it1 ut !~n: F;,.\.k-·\.:1 ,\t-i;J•,i_,_, .. , l:l_v Yt:'tldil':ll-.!.. 

t~~~- HH'It1 tf.! the Frdt-u~ ,-\dtrtllli:sirZltfnlt, E:HUnt Rr_g:i(HJ, );Lhm lnrtby -U'rt~~-y Ht;it II ~'tip~- vr Utb fi:-rrn 

~nH bt12n ftl<ro w1t1! thr: ~w;ning r.-~~ke-t Clerkr IT~::1 rin-g £1<Jct~t., f-eder'~l A!t!L:rC-::.r" Admi,1~str.:.ti<l t~, as. follow'S. 

I n•-J..:pcLJih.':!:-;:-.; A\ .:r:::~·~- S\'~-" , \1:i lbu1 

l l:.:.:.:;i:J;< f)ock,:: C;:;;; k, ,\C,Co~l);\ ;;;· 

l ~-~d-=J~:.·r~d:-,:r:•;,.-- -\ v-.:11~.K'. :S \\- __ '•.'>';::·.]: l11:2hm, 

.-'ri.~ht .11 a~k14t~-t! -:~ u ik"- ] '..•,:; tiiiiJ. 

S,!~!<: 2\'1: IUU<1

• 'lV;L'-ihinr;!t_:n, Vt 2!J51

J1; o'l.ti;,:~ill<};:: 

.'!<•!h·, ,,,,,_,:.,;- r_• _\, \fuJ F•..'dcn1.l Av~:il.i•YJ: /•.L:J:-~iniq-;,-,!iJ·,n_ X!_'-i 

·\lll:t'rlkw· I 1).,,-_L;:I Ckc~_, -v~;· 2'1! v.:;:r-

'llti '; r":-!11:t: :ls rrnt. ;;J,;j 1n :Jccmd,;g;,.·-;..· ••·][I· S;>..:l:~~n (¢)! 3:1 nf f"ll! 

t:Jd:.m:::.d.in1: 1"!:'1\H;-,;!;··\! in tb: k·r:::1 •:•!" {;'-J:L 'l\O[ :1 '-' hkJ: f'1i~. N,)!ko.:-

~-ni;:. iliHAt\Ja[if.H\ iii ~UJiO[~>;l Pl<l~l-dh( ju -t-t;· o.·;;,,{· l Wl Q; ~ ;lr~J "''"'"'"''m" i:.:'lt-~·J Ih..:t..:;_m;.:,~r o.:n:liF.;c;! 

!:1 Pun I:; .;1.f Ti:k Jd '1[ th: '·.,_1.J.: ,~r f"l.'l.'k·.::~! ~ub~tu:~:Am ~d f-w ota:J:;,.~; i:i ,-;:.1-Jnt:.:r:· I 11·~ 

!)iliJ;lD:t( .J~fl!J\.Q}J;. £i"H: l..:ifilh.:-<Ld ;,d~:r<T_.-Jior. ~~ :H-~~:l,~l±cJ k rt~SJf:i 1.: . .; i:1 ~:::-:Jh:!i;·,l:: '"' 

._:;;,_,_-;,:-_ 

~~,--Jl:Lil!.'i~.:C"--b';-?" 1,: • ..::-.:·1.',!0:..~ ~fu1c1 i.~L'"- ':<:f.H-~·n o1·,,:0!!iJ~ ,E.:;;;:•- b;:: ;!:~;-;;.:knc.-: in -~-~.;f,f>!.-'4>: •. :- ,;,----1_[1 ~J~· 1<-.-~:.-nc ·,f,J.:> rhv. 

:1pp·.!:-;1 ir: .S.y;h:·rr1 c.-\!~.'.'•~(•i\:',;: }L: t>U I --Tt,, :\ X..!~ :-r~ f!•(::t':i<ch<·3 r'rri~rt n:J"<: !1!~1..: i:·; ";ho' r_--~::J.;:;n_l_-: f~--:i''d.: · 

'
Exhibit
13.1




Certificate
of CEO Pursuant to
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 20-F of Grupo Casa Saba S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”) for
the  year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Manuel Saba
Ades, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alejandro Sadurni Gomez, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:
 (1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By: 
/s/ Manuel Saba
Ades
 Name:
Manuel Saba Ades
 Title:  
Chief Executive Officer
 Date: 
 June 30, 2008
 
 By: 
/s/ Alejandro Sadurni
Gomez
 Name:
Alejandro Sadurni Gomez
 Title:  
Chief Financial Officer
 Date: 
 June 30, 2008
 
  This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
  A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3483 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3483

 To increase the potential penalty for property damage at the National 
        Gallery of Art and certain other buildings and grounds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 2023

 Mr. Vance (for himself and Mr. Braun) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To increase the potential penalty for property damage at the National 
        Gallery of Art and certain other buildings and grounds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consequences for Climate Vandals 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PENALTIES FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE AT THE NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART 
              AND CERTAIN OTHER BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS.

    Section 6307(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``five'' and inserting ``ten''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Written Statementof the Chief Financial Officer**

I,Jason A. Jenne, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TrueTemper Sports, Inc. (the “Company”), state and certify that this Form 10-QQuarterly Report for the period ended July 1, 2007, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Form 10-QQuarterly Report for the period ended July 1, 2007, fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| /s/ JASON  A. JENNE                           |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jason A. Jenne                                |   |
| *Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and* |   |
| *Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)*     |   |
| August 15, 2007                          |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Remedent  USA, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  we, Robin
List,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  and  Stephen  F. Ross,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/S/ ROBIN LIST                                     /S/ STEPHEN F. ROSS
-------------------------                          -----------------------------
Robin List                                         Stephen F. Ross
Chief Executive Officer                            Chief Financial Officer
August 18, 2003                                    August 18, 2003


                                       1
#### Wendell P. HOLMES, Appellant-Petitioner, v. Joseph R. McDANIEL, Appellee-Respondent.

No. T-295.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 1973.

William H. Maness, and Leander J. Shaw, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellant-petitioner.

Lacy Mahon, of Mahon & Mahon, Jacksonville, for appellee-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We have treated this case as a petition for writ of certiorari, and deny the same.

Interlocutory appeal will not lie in this case, and the petition for certiorari being herein denied, the motions filed by the ap-pellee to strike and to dismiss are rendered moot.

Certiorari denied.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-621 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CIVIL AVIATION 

Transport Services 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SWITZERLAND 

Signed at Bern June 21, 2010 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 SWITZERLAND 

Civil Aviation: Transport Services 

 Agreement signed at Bern June 21, 2010; 

 Entered into force June 21, 2010. 

 With annexes.
#### Elmo Grandville BROWN, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-371.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 9, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### John D. CARLTON, Appellant, v. Joseph S. GARRY, Irene E. Garry, Dan Yates and Dorothy Yates, his wife, and H. D. Almond, Appellees.

No. 69-697.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 5, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1970.

Gordon V. Frederick, Sanford, for appellant.

A. Edwin Shinholser, of Shinholser & Logan, Sanford, for appellees Garry.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on this appeal from a final judgment in a declaratory judgment suit wherein the trial judge sat as the trier of fact. While there were conflicts in the testimony, it is our opinion that the trial judge’s findings of fact were supported by competent substantial evidence, and that his conclusions of law have not been demonstrated to be in error. The final judgment is affirmed on the principles expressed in Sapp v. Warner, 1932, 105 Fla. 245, 141 So. 124; Standard Oil Co. v. Mehrtens, 1928, 96 Fla. 455, 118 So. 216, 220; Myers v. Van Buskirk, 1928, 96 Fla. 704, 119 So. 123, 125.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
Turner-Fairbank Highway 

Research Center (TFHRC)

Learn about the innovative work being conducted 

in the TFHRC laboratories and programs.

The Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA) 

FHWA Research and 

Technology (R&T) Portfolio

Explore activities, initiatives, and projects that 

address the Nation’s highway challenges.

The FHWA R&T Story

Discover how FHWA advances innovations 

that strengthen the transportation system 

and meet the needs of the traveling public.

Public Roads

Read this popular quarterly magazine 

featuring the latest in Federal highway 

policies, programs, research, and technology. 

Sign up for a free digital subscription.

https://highways.dot.gov

Resources

TFHRC Office and Tours

Read about the offices that make 

up TFHRC, and plan a visit.

The Exploratory Advanced 

Research Program

Learn about this innovative program’s 

more long-term, high-risk research.

Transportation Pooled 

Fund Program 

Discover opportunities to collaborate with 

government agencies, academia, associations, and 

private industry to address transportation issues.

R&T Now 

Get the latest updates on FHWA research 

products, projects, and activities in the current 

issue of the R&T Now quarterly newsletter.

©FHWA.

FHWA-HRT-24-051

https://doi.org/10.21949/1521485

Innovating the Future of Transportation Resources
#### Richard P. MURRAY v. Carter H. HARRISON, Collector.

No. 5777.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Nov. 11, 1936.

Harris F. Williams, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.

S. E. Blackham, of Washington, D. G, for appellee.

Before EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges, and BRIGGLE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Now this day come the parties by their counsel and this cause now comes on to be heard on the printed record and briefs of counsel and on oral arguments.

On consideration whereof it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this *1013court that the decree of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J UNE 26, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NO T PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 12 00 8 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 6 :1 0- cr-0 02 94 -GAP-KRS- 1
UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us JOSE ANTONIO RIVERA, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Jun e 2 6, 2 01 2) Befo re TJ OFLAT, JORDAN andKRAVITCH, Cir cu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:H. Ky le Fle tc he r, ap po in te d c ou ns el forJo se Ant on io Riv era i n thi s d ire ct

cri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti onof t he ap pe ll an t an d h as fil eda br ie f pu rs ua ntto And er s v. C al if orni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rd rev eal s tha t co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re re co rdrev eal s n o a rg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andRiv era’s co nv ic ti on an d s en te nc e are AFFIRMED .

2
#### William Roger BOWLING, Appellant, v. Edward J. STACK, Sheriff of Broward County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 42926.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 22, 1973.

Cause dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6251

MICHAEL RAY WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RICK JACKSON, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-170-5-F3) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Ray Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Michael Ray Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motions for appointment of counsel and for a certificate of appealability, and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Jackson , No. CA-00-170-5-F3 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED