alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ICC Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), we, ,Richard
K. Lauer, the Chief Executive Officer of our Company, and Scott K Anderson, Jr.,
the Chief Financial Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1. the
Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of our
Company.





ICC
      WORLDWIDE, INC.Date:
      February 19, 2009
            By:
            /s/ Richard K LauerRichard
      K Lauer
              President
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      February 19, 2009
            /s/ Scott K. Anderson,
      Jr.Scott
      K. Anderson, Jr.
              Chief
      Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of International Fuel Technology Inc. (“IFT”), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of IFT on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of IFT. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to IFT and will be retained by IFT and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| By:    | /s/ MICHAEL F. OBERTOP                         |   | Date  October 27, 2004 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|   |                                                |   |                        |
|   | Michael F.   Obertop   Chief Financial Officer |   |                        |
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

October 7, 2008 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CURTIS LEE MAJORS

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County

No. 2006-D-3084 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge

No. M2007-01911-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 21, 2009

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., J., dissenting.

Respectfully, I dissent from the majority view that the evidence was sufficient to

support the conviction of tampering with evidence. The evidence did not establish the defendant’s

guilt of this offense beyond a reasonable doubt. 

The State is obliged to establish the factual presence of the elements of the offense.

Although such may be accomplished purely through the use of circumstantial evidence, Duchac v.

State, 505 S.W.2d 237 (Tenn. 1973), as was the case now before us, the facts and circumstances

“must be so strong and cogent as to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save the guilt of the

defendant,” State v. Crawford, 470 S.W.2d 610, 612 (Tenn. 1971). “In other words, ‘[a] web of guilt

must be woven around the defendant from which he cannot escape and from which facts and

circumstances the jury could draw no other reasonable inference save the guilt of the defendant

beyond a reasonable doubt.’” State v. McAfee, 737 S.W.2d 304, 306 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987)

(quoting Crawford, 470 S.W.2d at 613).

The reasonable doubt standard is rather rigorous by design and by function of

principles of due process of law. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 324, 99 S. Ct. 2781,

2791-92 (1979). The burden is not met when the finder of fact must speculate as to the presence of

all factual elements of the conviction offense. See, e.g., State v Gloria A. Porter, No.

W2004-02464-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App., Jackson, Sept. 21, 2005). In the present case, one

may well speculate that the defendant was “up to something” when the officers entered the residence,

but it is not merely a surrender to naivete to expect that the prosecution must actually prove

circumstances upon which guilt may be singularly inferred. 

To illustrate my conclusion that the State failed to do this in the present case, I

considered what would have been the result had the defendant been prosecuted for misdemeanor
-2-

possession of cocaine based circumstantially upon flushing such cocaine down the toilet. The mind

easily recoils against the proposition that the defendant’s flushing activity could have resulted in a

conviction of even a minimal drug-possession offense, and yet, the instant offense is exactly that;

it is predicated upon the possession or control of a “thing” or “evidence.” 

 In conclusion, I would have held that the evidence was insufficient to support the 

conviction of tampering with evidence.

___________________________________ 

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00469-CV

In re Amin Al-Ahmad, M.D., and Texas Cardiac Arrythmia, PLLC

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Filed: September 24, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2969 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2969

   To ensure that United States diplomats and officials of the U.S. 
Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission are able to 
 advance efforts seeking compliance by the United Mexican States with 
 the 1944 Treaty on Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana 
                     Rivers and of the Rio Grande.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 28 (legislative day, September 22), 2023

   Mr. Cruz introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To ensure that United States diplomats and officials of the U.S. 
Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission are able to 
 advance efforts seeking compliance by the United Mexican States with 
 the 1944 Treaty on Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana 
                     Rivers and of the Rio Grande.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADVANCING EFFORTS SEEKING COMPLIANCE BY MEXICO WITH TREATY 
              ON UTILIZATION OF WATERS OF THE COLORADO AND TIJUANA 
              RIVERS AND OF THE RIO GRANDE.

    The Secretary of State shall use the voice, vote, diplomatic 
capital, and resources of the United States to ensure that United 
States diplomats and officials of the U.S. Section of the International 
Boundary and Water Commission are able to advance efforts seeking 
compliance by the United Mexican States with the Treaty on Utilization 
of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande, 
signed at Washington February 3, 1944, and to establish understandings 
to provide predictable and reliable future deliveries of water by the 
United Mexican States.
                                 <all>
```
255 La. 474

#### Albert LeMAY, Jr. and Frances Calderone LeMay v. GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION, Ltd., et al.

No. 50343.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 27, 1970.

In re: Albert LeMay, Jr. and Frances Calderone LeMay applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 228 So.2d 713.

The application is denied. According to the facts, as stated to be by the Court of Appeal, the result reached by the Court is correct.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3596 

To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to amend references of gilsonite to 

asphaltite. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2024 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to amend references 

of gilsonite to asphaltite. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MINERAL AMENDMENT TO THE MINERAL LEAS4 ING ACT. 

5 The first section of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 

6 U.S.C. 181) and sections 21, 27, 34, 39, and 43 of that 

7 Act (30 U.S.C. 241, 184, 182, 209, 226–3) are amended 

8 by striking ‘‘gilsonite’’ each place it appears and inserting 

9 ‘‘asphaltite’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### BECHER et al. v. SIDNER.

No. 10658.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 4, 1937.

N. H. Mapes, of Fremont, Neb., for appellants.

S. S. Sidnor, of Fremont, Neb., pro se.

Before STONE, SANBORN, and VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judges.

STONE, Circuit Judge.

Sidner brought an action against the receiver of the Union National Bank of Fremont to recover dividends unpaid to him upon a deposit which he had in the bank at the time it was taken over by the comptroller. Besides admitting the deposit, the allowance thereof as a claim, the declaration of dividends, and their nonpayment on this deposit, the receiver pleaded a counterclaim which was that Sidner was the owner of 8% shares of the bank stock and that he had never responded to the double liability which had been ordered by the comptroller. Thus the counterclaim presented the sole controverted issue. Jury was waived and the court found for plaintiff upon his claim and upon defendants’ counterclaim. From a judgment entered thereon, the receiver appeals.

The only questions below or here are whether Sidner was an actual stockholder or is estopped to deny his liability as such. There was no stipulation of facts covering these issues. Evidence was introduced upon them. There is no question as to the sufficiency of the findings to sustain the judgment. Whether the trial court committed error depends upon the sufficiency of the evidence as to actual ownership and as to estoppel. The entire issue here is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings.

There was a written waiver of jury. There was no request for findings nor any motion for judgment on the ground that the evidence compelled findings or judgment for appellants. In such state of the record, the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings is not open to review in this court. 28 U.S.C. A. § 875; Fierce v. Wyatt (C.C.A.) 83 F.(2d) 892, 893, with numerous citations from the Supreme Court and this court.

The judgment is affirmed.
Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.
                                One Beacon Street
                                Boston, MA 02108

                                May 5, 2009



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC  20549


     RE:  DWS Money Market  Series,  (the "Fund"),  a series of DWS Money Market
          Trust (the "Trust") (Reg. Nos. 2-78122 and 811-03495)


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Trust
hereby certifies that the form of Prospectus and Statement of Additional
Information that would have been filed on behalf of the Fund pursuant to Rule
497(c) upon the effectiveness of Post-Effective Amendment No. 46 to the Trust's
Registration Statement on form N-1A (the "Amendment"), do not differ from that
contained in the Amendment, which is the most recent Registration Statement and
was filed electronically on April 30, 2009.

Any comments or questions on this filing should be directed to the undersigned
at (617) 295-3986.

                                    Very truly yours,


                                    /s/Scott D. Hogan

                                    Scott D. Hogan
                                    Vice President
                                    Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.

aht/sh

cc:      Thomas Hiller, Esq., Ropes & Gray
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EDWARD J. NICHOLAS, )

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) C.A. No. 06-207 Erie

) District Judge McLaughlin

MICHELLE ZIMMERMAN, et al, ) Magistrate Judge Baxter

Defendants. )

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I. RECOMMENDATION

It is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without prejudice

to Plaintiff’s right to pay the filing fee of $350.00 before October 20, 2006. 

II. REPORT

Plaintiff, an inmate incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Albion, presented

this civil rights complaint. 

Section 804(g) of Pub.L. No. 104-134, enacted April 26, 1996, amended 28 U.S.C. §

1915 to provide:

[i]n no events shall a prisoner bring a civil action ... under this section if the

prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any

facility, brought an action or appeal in the court of the United States that was

dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger

of serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. §1915(g).

Plaintiff has been a prolific advocate in this federal court. At least three of Plaintiff’s

prior lawsuits have been dismissed as legally frivolous: Civil Actions Numbers 06-98Erie, 06-

112Erie, and 06-201Erie, all filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of

Pennsylvania. 

Case 1:06-cv-00207-SJM-SPB Document 3 Filed 10/02/06 Page 1 of 2
2

An indigent inmate may overcome the “Three Strikes Rule” if he can show that he is

under “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307

(3d Cir. 2001) (interpreting imminent danger). Plaintiff has not alleged such imminent danger.

Accordingly, Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee before October 20, 2006, or risk

dismissal of this action.

III. CONCLUSION

Because of these prior dismissals, and because Plaintiff has not alleged that he is in

imminent danger of serious physical injury, it is recommended that the complaint be dismissed

without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to pay the full filing fee of $350.00 to the Clerk of Courts

before October 20, 2006. 

In accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Local

Rule 72.1.4B, the parties are allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file written

objections to this report. Any party opposing the objections shall have seven (7) days from the

date of service of objections to respond thereto. Failure to timely file objections may constitute

a waiver of any appellate rights.

S/ Susan Paradise Baxter

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: October 2, 2006

Case 1:06-cv-00207-SJM-SPB Document 3 Filed 10/02/06 Page 2 of 2
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Rouge Resources Ltd. on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2013 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2013

ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.

/s/ Linda Smith
--------------------------------------- Linda Smith,President and
Chief Executive Officer.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3386 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3386

 To temporarily suspend the importation of beef and beef products from 
    Paraguay and to require the establishment of a working group to 
  evaluate the threat to food safety and animal health posed by beef 
            imported from Paraguay, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 4, 2023

Mr. Rounds (for himself and Mr. Tester) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To temporarily suspend the importation of beef and beef products from 
    Paraguay and to require the establishment of a working group to 
  evaluate the threat to food safety and animal health posed by beef 
            imported from Paraguay, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF IMPORTS OF BEEF AND BEEF PRODUCTS 
              FROM PARAGUAY.

    Beef and beef products imported from Paraguay may not enter the 
United States during the period--
            (1) beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) ending on the date on which the working group 
        established under section 2 submits the recommendations 
        required by subsection (a)(3) of that section if the working 
        group determines under subsection (a)(1) of that section that 
        beef and beef products imported from Paraguay do not pose a 
        threat to food safety and animal health in the United States.

SEC. 2. WORKING GROUP ON BEEF IMPORTED FROM PARAGUAY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall establish a 
working group--
            (1) to evaluate the threat posed by beef and beef products 
        imported from Paraguay to food safety and animal health in the 
        United States;
            (2) to report on the most recent disease data and conduct 
        additional research on the threat to food safety and animal 
        health; and
            (3) to make recommendations to the Secretary with respect 
        to whether the importation of beef and beef products from 
        Paraguay into the United States should be permitted.
    (b) Membership.--The Secretary shall ensure that the working group 
established under subsection (a) includes--
            (1) experts on food safety;
            (2) experts on animal health; and
            (3) representatives of U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
        and other Federal agencies with responsibilities relating to 
        international trade.
                                 <all>
```
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

DC-01 14th Street Brige Sign Relocation Overhead Highway Sign 

Removal & Replacement

National Park Service - 

National Mall & Memorial 

Parks

DDOT NA

DC-02 Tilden Street Trail Design & Construction of 

multi-use trail

National Park Service - 

Rock Creek Park DDOT NA

DC-03 Metro Access Path on Galloway 

Street NW

Design & Construction of 

multi-use path

National Park Service - 

Rock Creek Park DDOT NA

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the District of Columbia Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its initial, 

multiyear Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the District of Columbia FLAP are listed below in no particular order and 

include:

District of Columbia Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2013-2014

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency partners. 

The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. Funding for these projects is not guaranteed. Funding beyond 2014 is 

dependent on reauthorization of the Access Program by Congress. The District of Columbia PDC does not have a firm date for the next call for projects 

under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. If you have any questions please contact David Payne, Access Program 

Manager, at 571-434-1543 or email at David.Payne@dot.gov.
#### Louis BRUMER and Mina Brumer, Appellants, v. FORTE APARTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-508.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 2, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3435 

To repeal the requirements of the Foreign Dredge Act of 1906 with respect 

to dredging and dredged material. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2023 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To repeal the requirements of the Foreign Dredge Act of 

1906 with respect to dredging and dredged material. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Port Modernization 

5 and Supply Chain Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DREDGING; DREDGED MATERIAL. 

7 (a) REPEAL.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 55109 of title 46, 

9 United States Code, is repealed. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3435 IS

1 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The analysis 

2 for chapter 551 of title 46, United States Code, is 

3 amended by striking the item relating to section 

4 55109. 

5 (b) EXCLUDING DREDGED MATERIAL FROM TRANS6 PORTATION REQUIREMENTS.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 55110 of title 46, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 

9 (A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘OR

10 DREDGED MATERIAL’’; and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘or dredged material’’. 

12 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The analysis 

13 for chapter 551 of title 46, United States Code, is 

14 amended by striking the item relating to section 

15 55110 and inserting the following: 

‘‘Sec. 55110. Transportation of valueless material.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
State ofIncorporation/
    
    Name Under WhichNames of Significant Subsidiaries
    
    Organization
    
    Business is Done1. Camden Operating, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    Camden Operating, L.P.2. Camden USA, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    Camden USA, Inc.3. Camden Development, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    Camden Development, Inc.4. Camden Realty, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    Camden Realty, Inc.5. Camden Summit, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    Camden Summit, Inc.6. Camden Summit Partnership, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    Camden Summit Partnership, L.P.7. CPT Community Owner, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    CPT Community Owner, LLC8. 2009 CPT Community Owner, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    2009 CPT Community Owner, LLC