alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350,  chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Rural/Metro  Corporation,  a Delaware  corporation  (the
"Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company
on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "10-K/A Report") that:

     (1)  the 10-K/A  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the 10-K/A Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: October 28, 2002


/s/ JACK E. BRUCKER
-------------------------------------
Jack E. Brucker
President and Chief Executive Officer
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3029631-MAR-201108:38 AM
December 3, 2015

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 3rd day of December, 2015.

10-15-00209-CR	KENNETH WILEY v. THE STATE OF TEXAS - ON APPEAL FROM THE 52ND DISTRICT COURT OF CORYELL COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. FO-14-22334 – AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Davis:

	“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the judgment be in all things affirmed, and that the appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
259 La. 65

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Herman SMITH v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51526.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1971.

In re: Herman Smith applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. The record before us does not justify the exercise of our jurisdiction.
#### Manuel Adolfo RAOLA, Appellant, v. Isabel Gertrudis Rosario RAOLA, Appellee.

No. 70-911.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 8, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
**Transcript: "Preventing P.A.D."**

Narrator: Don't wait until you get P.A.D. to change your life. Start now and you may help prevent it. Quit smoking. If you're having trouble, talk to your health care provider about a smoking cessation plan. Make sure you know your blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose levels and if they're high, work with your doctor to lower them. Follow a heart healthy eating plan and aim for a healthy weight. Finally, try for 30 minutes of physical activity a day, every day.

Rita: I don't care if it's in a mall, if you walk up and down thirty minutes, if you walk in your neighborhood, if you walk with your dog, you walk on a treadmill, you walk around your house for thirty minutes. You have to do it because your leg will stop circulating, the blood will stop.

Andrew: If you exercise you get so that it becomes a habit, you become, you will say, addicted to it and if you don't do it then you feel that there is something out of your day that you missed.

Mike: With diet changes and regular exercise, it helps your heart, helps your circulation and just, I feel fantastic now.

Narrator: The earlier you take steps, the more likely you'll stay in circulation. Enjoy the things you like to do, decrease your risk for heart attack and stroke, and maybe even save your life. 

Mike: Staying in circulation is not only a health issue, it's a whole way of life.

Andrew: Stay in circulation.

Rita: Stay in circulation.
**EXHIBIT 10.10.2**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THEWASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.EQUITY AND PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN**

 

WHEREAS,Washington Group International, Inc. (the “Company”) has heretofore establishedthe Washington Group International, Inc. Equity and Performance Incentive Plan(the “Plan”), for the benefit of its eligible employees and directors; and

 

WHEREAS, theBoard of Directors of the Company has the authority under Paragraph 19 of thePlan to amend the Plan, with certain amendments subject to approval of theCompany’s shareholders; and

 

WHEREAS, theBoard of Directors desires to amend the Plan in order to increase theperformance units available for award under the Plan, subject to shareholderapproval;

 

NOW,THEREFORE, subject to shareholder approval at the Company’s 2003 annual meetingof stockholders, the Plan shall be amended as follows:

 

1.

 

Paragraph 3(f)of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

 

“(f)          Notwithstanding any other provision ofthis Plan to the contrary, in no event shall any Participant in any calendaryear receive an award of Performance Shares or Performance Units having anaggregate maximum value as of their respective Dates of Grant in excess of$2,000,000.”

 

2.

 

Except asamended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS,WHEREOF, the Board of Directors has caused this Amendment to be executed by anofficer of the Company duly authorized on this 9th day of November, 2002.

 
|   | **WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.** |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                                     |   |
|   | By:                                      | /s/ Richard D. Parry |   |
|   |                                     | Richard D.  Parry |   |
|   | Its:                                     | Senior Vice  President and General Counsel |   |

 

----
Case 1:12-cr-00052-WSH Document 105 Filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 2
2

cc: James Lamont Johnson, pro se 

 No. 20078-068 

 CCA Northeast Ohio Corrections 

 2240 Hubbard Road 

 Youngstown, OH 44505 

Case 1:12-cr-00052-WSH Document 105 Filed 07/27/15 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55434-55435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Integrated Review of the NRC Assessment Processes for Operating 
Commercial Nuclear Reactors; Meeting

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is holding a meeting 
to provide brief overviews of their planned Integrated Review of the 
NRC Assessment Process for Operating Commercial Nuclear Reactors, 
planned improvements to the current Senior Management Meeting (SMM) 
process, and to provide members of the public, including Nuclear Energy 
Institute (NEI) and Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) 
representatives, an opportunity to provide early input and comments on 
these efforts. The meeting is open to the public and all interested 
parties may attend and provide comments.

DATES: November 6, 1997, from 9:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One White Flint North, Room 
6-B11, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Louis Gamberoni, Mail Stop O-12-
E4, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

[[Page 55435]]

Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Telephone: (301) 415-1144; 
Internet: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f5b53582d5f514d5c31585049">[email protected]</a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NRC has initiated a comprehensive review 
of its processes for assessing the safety performance of operating 
commercial nuclear power plants. These processes include plant 
performance reviews, Systematic Assessments of Licensee Performance 
(SALP), and Senior Management Meetings. The review is described in 
SECY-97-122, ``Integrated Review of the NRC Assessment Process for 
Operating Commercial Nuclear Reactors.'' In addition, the NRC has 
initiated improvement actions for the current Senior Management Meeting 
process. A meeting is being held with members of the public (including 
NEI and UCS) to seek comments on these efforts. A preliminary agenda 
for the meeting is as follows:

1. Integrated Review of Assessment Process, presented by NRC
2. SMM Improvements Actions, presented by NRC
3. Comment period

    Attendees are requested to notify David Louis Gamberoni at (301) 
415-1144 of their planned attendance if special services are necessary.
    The NRC is accessible to the White Flint Metro Station. Visitor 
parking near the NRC buildings is limited.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of October, 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Richard W. Borchardt,
Chief, Inspection Program Branch, Division of Inspection and Support 
Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-28261 Filed 10-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Frank HILAND, Appellant, v. Francis O. HUCKS, Appellee.

No. 70-517.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 28, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; B. C. Muszynski, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB (the  "Report") of
Global Vision Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30,
2002,  the  undersigned  Jack  Chang,  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:  November 19, 2002                /s/ Jack Chang
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Jack Chang, Chief Executive Officer
                                         and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant To


Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marimba, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Andrew Chmyz, Acting Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented in the Report.





November 12, 2002





/s/ Andrew ChmyzAndrew Chmyz Acting Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Amendment to 1994 Omnibus Stock Plan



 
Exhibit
10.2.1 
 
AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO

1994 OMNIBUS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 
WHEREAS, the Administrator has deemed it to be in the best interest of the Company to amend the 1994 Omnibus
Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) to cancel all authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock eligible for new grants or awards; and 
 
WHEREAS, Article XIII of the Plan permits the Board of Directors to amend the Plan; and 
 
WHEREAS, Article V governs the maximum number of shares
authorized for issuance under the Plan. 
 
THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows: 
 

	 	1.	 	The third sentence of Article V of the Plan is deleted and replaced with the following sentence: “Effective December 30, 2002, the Administrator shall award no
new shares of Restricted Stock, Options or SARs; accordingly, effective December 30, 2002, the maximum number of shares available under the Plan since its inception is 2,642,515.” 

 

	 	2.	 	The fifth and sixth sentences of Article V are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following sentence: “If an Option or SAR is terminated, in whole
or in part, for any reason other than its exercise or the exercise of a Corresponding SAR, the number of shares allocated to the Option or SAR, or portion thereof, shall be cancelled.” 

 

	 	3.	 	This amendment is effective as of December 30, 2002. 

 

	 ALBEMARLE CORPORATION

	
	       /S/    WILLIAM M. GOTTWALD


	 By:
	 	 William M. Gottwald

	 Its:
	 	 Chairman of the Board
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3200 

To reauthorize the loan repayment program for the substance use disorder 

treatment workforce. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2023 

Ms. HASSAN (for herself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the loan repayment program for the substance 

use disorder treatment workforce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Substance Use Dis5 order Treatment and Recovery Loan Repayment Program 

6 Reauthorization Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM FOR SUBSTANCE USE 

8 DISORDER TREATMENT WORKFORCE. 

9 Section 781 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 295h) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3200 IS

1 (1) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(3) TAX LIABILITY.—The amount of a pay4 ment made under this section on behalf of an indi5 vidual shall not be considered income for any pur6 pose under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.’’; 

7 and 

8 (2) in subsection (j), by striking ‘‘$25,000,000 

9 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023’’ and in10 serting ‘‘$50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 

11 through 2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
October 1, 2015

Exemption No. 11737A Regulatory Docket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 0837

Mr. Edwin E. Brochin

1275 West 86th Street Indianapolis, IN 46260

Dear Mr. Brochin :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter posted to the public docket on July 14, 2015

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA) for an amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from
§§ 61.23(a) and ( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 1 4, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform

aerial data collection

. You requested an amendment to add closed

- set motion picture and television filming to your operations.

In your petition, you indicate that t here has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

. T he

unmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are comparable in type, size, weight, speed and operating capabilities to those in this petition

.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 11737 remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is granted an amendment to add closed

- set motion picture and television filming to its UAS operations.2

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 11737 remain in effect exc ept
as follows. Condition No. 2 has been updated to permit closed

- set motion picture and television filming

.

Failure to com ply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming

are permitted.

T his exemption terminates on May 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 349 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 349

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to authorize the appointment of 
    spouses of members of the Armed Forces who are on active duty, 
   disabled, or deceased to positions in which the spouses will work 
                               remotely.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2023

  Mr. Lankford (for himself, Ms. Sinema, Mrs. Fischer, and Mr. King) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to authorize the appointment of 
    spouses of members of the Armed Forces who are on active duty, 
   disabled, or deceased to positions in which the spouses will work 
                               remotely.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Spouse Employment Act''.

SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF MILITARY SPOUSES.

    Section 3330d of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph 
                (4);
                    (B) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(3) The term `remote work' refers to a particular type of 
        telework under which an employee is not expected to report to 
        an officially established agency location on a regular and 
        recurring basis.''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) The term `telework' has the meaning given the term in 
        section 6501.'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``or'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) a spouse of a member of the Armed Forces on active 
        duty, or a spouse of a disabled or deceased member of the Armed 
        Forces, to a position in which the spouse will engage in remote 
        work.''; and
            (3) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ``subsection (a)(3)'' 
        and inserting ``subsection (a)(4)''.
                                 <all>
```
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 2009 - Present ND Crash Records System Officer's Manual 

and Field Guide 2009

4 - Incapacitating Injury A

Any injury, other than a fatality, which prevents the injured person from walking, driving or 

normally continuing the activities the person was capable of performing before the injury 

occurred. Often defined as “needing help from the scene.” Includes but is not limited to: 

Severe lacerations, broken or distorted limbs, skull or chest injuries, abdominal injuries, and 

unconsciousness at or when taken from the crash scene.

C - CRASH SEVERITY

codes & definitions found on 

Manual pg12 (PDF pg22).

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE STATE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 2009 - Present

ND DOT Crash Records System Officer's 

Manual and Field Guide for Completing 

Motor Vehicle Crash Reports 2009

ND Motor Vehicle Crash Report 2010

Pedestrian 19 Any person not in or on a motor vehicle or other road vehicle R - Unit Configuration

code found on Manual pg16-17 

(PDF pg26-27), 

definition found on Manual pg43 

(PDF pg53)

Other Pedestrian (Wheelchair) 26

Pedestrian Conveyance – Any human-powered device by which a pedestrian may move, or by 

which a person may move another pedestrian, other than by pedaling. Includes: Baby 

carriage, coaster wagon, ice/roller skates, push cart, scooter, skis, sled, wheelchair, rickshaw, 

skateboard. Excludes: Bicycle (pedalcycle).

R - Unit Configuration

code found on pg Manual 16-17 

(PDF pg26-27) , 

definition found on Manual pg43 

(PDF pg53)

Pedalcyclist 2009 - Present

Pedalcycle 10 A vehicle operated solely by pedals and propelled by human power. Includes: Bicycle, tricycle, 

unicycle, pedalcar R - Unit Configuration

code found on pg Manual 16-17 

(PDF pg26-27) , 

definition found on Manual pg43 

(PDF pg53)

North Dakota