55396 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 206 / Friday, October 24, 1997 / Notices

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in

Room 2029 Sills Building, National

Technical Information Service, 5285

Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia

22161.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will

be open to public participation from

1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on November 25,

1997. Approximately thirty minutes will

be set aside on November 25, 1997, for

comments or questions from the public.

Seats will be available for the public

and for the media on a first-come, firstserved basis. Any member of the public

may submit written comments

concerning the Board’s affairs at any

time. Copies of the minutes of the open

session meeting will be available within

thirty days of the meeting from the

address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda Lucas, NTIS Advisory Board

Secretary, National Technical

Information Service, 5285 Port Royal

Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161

Telephone: (703) 487–4636; Fax (703)

487–4093.

Dated: October 20, 1997.

Donald R. Johnson,

Director.

[FR Doc. 97–28220 Filed 10–23–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–04–M

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND

COMMUNITY SERVICE

Sunshine Act Meeting

Pursuant to the provisions of the

Government in the Sunshine Act (5

U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given of

the following meeting of the Board of

Directors of the Corporation for National

and Community Service (Corporation).

DATE AND TIME: Friday, October 31, 1997,

from 9:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at the

Union Planter’s Bank, 900 S. Gay Street,

24th floor, Knoxville, Tennessee.

STATUS: The meeting will be open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Board

of Directors of the Corporation will meet

to review reports from Committees of

the Board regarding Corporation

activities, deliberate and decide on the

Corporation’s annual plan, and review

the status of various Corporation

initiatives.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rhonda Taylor, Assoc. Dir., Special

Projects and Initiatives, Corporation for

National Service, 1201 New York

Avenue, NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC

20525. Telephone (202) 606–5000 ext.

282. (T.D.D. (202) 565–2799)).

Dated: October 22, 1997.

Stewart Davis,

Acting General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 97–28432 Filed 10–22–97; 3:23 pm]

BILLING CODE 6050–28–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Armored Security Vehicle (ASV)

AGENCY: U.S. Army Tank-automotive

and Armaments Command, Army, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of Intent.

SUMMARY: The Program Manager, Light

Tactical Vehicles (PM LTV) has

prepared a Life-Cycle Environmental

Assessment (LCEA) which examines the

potential impacts to the natural and

human environment from the life cycle

activities of the Armored Security

Vehicle (ASV). Based on the LCEA, PM

LTV has determined that the proposed

action is not a major Federal action

significantly affecting the quality of the

human environment, within the

meaning of the National Environmental

Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore,

the preparation of an environmental

impact statement is not required and the

Army is issuing this Finding of No

Significant Impact (FONSI).

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be sent to, U.S. Army Tank-automotive

and Armaments Command (TACOM),

ATTN: AMSTA–DSA–LT (ASV),

Warren, MI 48397–5000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

further information, or to obtain a copy

of the ASV Life-Cycle Environmental

Assessment contact Mr. Anthony Shaw,

Weapon System Manager (810) 574–

8654.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

a. Proposed Action

This LCEA examines the potential

impacts to the natural and human

environment from the procurement of

the ASV to satisfy the Army’s need for

survivability in a Military Police (MP)

mobile platform. The ASV will be used

by MP three-man teams in highly

exposed threat environments. Current

funding is available to procure up to 195

vehicles.

b. Environmental Impacts

The ASV life-cycle includes the

transport of vehicles to test sites, testing,

vehicle production, deployment and

operation of production vehicles and

their eventual demilitarization.

Potential environmental impacts of

these life-cycle stages may include Air

Quality, Noise, Water, Soil and

Groundwater, Hazardous Materials and

Hazardous Wastes, and Flora, Fauna

and Threatened or Endangered Species

at each of these life-cycle phases.

c. Additional Findings

Impacts from the proposed action

would be minimal and not significant

for the following reasons:

(1) The ASV will be used in its

intended environment. This intended

environment includes vehicle

production and some testing at the

Contractor’s facility, and the remainder

of life-cycle activities at Army

installations and facilities.

(2) The ASV is very similar to

vehicles produced commercially and

vehicles already in the Army inventory.

It is being produced in low to moderate

quantities and will not significantly

increase the vehicle population at Army

installations and facilities.

(3) The overall environmental risk

associated with the ASV is very low. It

does not introduce any new

technologies or processes. Vehicle life

cycle activities do not introduce any

potential environmental impacts that

are not already currently mitigated by

Army policy and procedures.

(4) The ASV Project Manager has

ensured that the Contractor producing

the vehicle is environmentally

compliant, has no permit violations, and

has commercial practices for Hazardous

Material Management and Pollution

Prevention in production of the ASV.

(5) The ASV Product Manager

recognizes that Army installations and

facilities have environmental plans and

measures in place to address vehicle life

cycle activities very similar to that of

the ASV to prevent, mitigate and

remediate environmental damage

caused by vehicle operation. Vehicle

operations at these Army installations

and facilities are in conjunction with

normal activities that are already

addressed in their site specific

environmental impact statements.

d. Determination

It is therefore concluded that this

program:

(1) Is not a major federal action

significantly affecting the quality of

human environment.

(2) Will not have a significant impact

on the environment.

(3) Is not likely to be environmentally

controversial.

(4) Will not likely result in litigation

based on environmental quality issues.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 206 / Friday, October 24, 1997 / Notices 55397

(5) Does not require an Environmental

Impact Statement (EIS).

Gregory B. Showalter,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 97–28281 Filed 10–23–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Armed Forces Epidemiological Board

(AFEB)

AGENCY: Office of The Surgeon General.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: In accordance with section

10(a)(2) of Public Law 92–463, The

Federal Advisory Committee Act, this

announces the forthcoming AFEB

Meeting. The meeting will be held from

0800–1630, Thursday and Friday,

December 11–12, 1997. The purpose of

the meeting is to address pending Board

issues, provide briefings for Board

members on topics related to ongoing

and new Board issues, and to conduct

an executive working session. The

meeting location will be at the Walter

Reed Army Institute Research (WRAIR),

Washington, D.C. The meeting will be

open to the public, but limited by space

accommodations. Any interested person

may attend, appear before or file

statements with the committee at the

time and in the manner permitted by the

committee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

COL Vicky Fogelman, AFEB Executive

Secretary, Army Forces Epidemiological

Board, Skyline Six, 5109 Leesburg Pike,

Room 693, Falls Church, Virginia

22041–3258, (703) 681–8012/4.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Mary V. Yonts,

Alternate Army Federal Register Liaison

Officer.

[FR Doc. 97–28282 Filed 10–23–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Corps of Engineers

Intent To Prepare a Draft

Environmental Impact Statement

(DEIS) for a Proposed Deepening of

the Brunswick Harbor Navigation

Project, Glynn County, Georgia

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,

DOD.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

SUMMARY: A feasibility study is

underway which considers alternatives

of a 2, 4, or 6 foot deepening of the

navigation channel from the inner

harbor to the ocean.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Questions regarding this proposal may

be directed to Ms. Ana Vergara, (912)

652–5837, U.S. Corps of Engineers,

Savannah District, P.O. Box 889,

Savannah, Georgia 31402–0889.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

1. Current Project Description. The

Brunswick Harbor Navigation Project is

located in the southeastern section of

Glynn County, Georgia, adjacent to the

City of Brunswick. The harbor is

approximately 80 highway miles south

of Savannah, Georgia, and 70 miles

north of Jacksonville, Florida. The

authorized project consists of

approximately 30 miles of channels at

various depths and widths which

include the following segments: 32 feet

deep and 500 feet wide across the outer

bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide

through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick

River, and East River; 30 feet deep and

300 feet wide in Turtle River to mile

12.76; 30 feet and 400 feet wide, and

7000 feet long in South Brunswick River

above the Georgia Port Authority bulk

terminal dock; 27 feet deep and 350 feet

wide in East River from Second Avenue

to the confluence with Academy Creek;

24 feet deep and 150 feet wide in

Academy Creek; 20 feet deep and 150

feet wide in Back River; and 10 feet

deep and 80 feet wide in Terry Creek.

The project has three authorized turning

basins. Annual maintenance of the

project requires dredging and disposal

of approximately 1.8 million cubic

yards of material.

2. Proposed Action. The alternatives

being considered are 2, 4, or 6 foot

deepening of the navigation channel

from the inner harbor (approximately

from Station 12+000 at the East River

Upper Range and Station 45+500 at the

Turtle River Lower Range), across the

bar channel to the ocean. The proposed

plan would include: widening the

channel from 200 feet to 400 feet at the

Sidney Lanier Bridge; widening Lower

Turtle Range from 350 feet to 400 feet;

improving the Lower Turtle River

turning basin; constructing a new

turning basin in Upper East River, dike

raising the Andrews Island confined

disposal facility to +35 feet mlw;

placing material dredged from the

inner/upper harbor into the confined

disposal facility; place material dredged

from the Bar Channel into the existing

Ocean Disposal Site and using dredged

material from two ranges for the

construction of a submerged berm in the

nearshore area off the northern end of

Jekyll Island. Overdepth and advanced

maintenance requirements in the

navigation channel will be analyzed as

part of the feasibility study. Any

proposed modification of this proposed

plan will be addressed, as appropriate,

during preparation of the Environmental

Impact Statement.

3. Alternatives. The proposed study

includes the following alternatives:

a. No Action/Maintenance of status

quo.

b. Improvement of existing navigation

facilities, with alternatives addressed in

2-foot increments to a maximum of 6

feet.

4. Study Description. This study will

include an analysis of potential impacts

on endangered species, fisheries, birds,

marine mammals, water quality, historic

properties, etc., resulting from the

various alternatives. This study is being

conducted by the U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers.

5. Scoping Process: Federal, State, and

local officials; conservation groups; and

interested businesses, groups, and

individuals are invited to comment on

the proposed project. Comments

received as result of this notice will be

used to assist in identifying potential

impacts to the quality of the

environment. This study is a

continuation of a harbor deepening

study initiated in 1963 that considered

project depths of 2, 4, 6, and 8 feet.

Formal coordination with State and

Federal Agencies was conducted at that

time. On May 4, 1995 a Public

Information Meeting was held at

Brunswick to identify issues and

concerns from the public about the

proposed Brunswick Harbor Deepening

Project.

6. Address for Comments: Written

comments may be forwarded to: District

Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

(Attention: Ms. Ana Vergara, PD–E),

P.O. Box 889, Savannah, Georgia 31402–

0889. Comments should be received

within 30 days of the publication of this

notice in the Federal Register to ensure

timely consideration.

7. Availability of the DEIS. The Draft

Environmental Impact Statement is

expected to be available to the public in

December 1997.

M.J. Yuschishin,

Chief, Planning Division.

[FR Doc. 97–28278 Filed 10–23–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–HP–M