alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006113DE.01002602.xml

| 27.4.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 113/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 113/26

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1/2005 des Rates vom 22. Dezember 2004 über den Schutz von Tieren beim Transport und damit zusammenhängenden Vorgängen sowie zur Änderung der Richtlinien 64/432/EWG und 93/119/EG und der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1255/97

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 3 vom 5. Januar 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 3 vom 5. Januar 2005

Seite 32, Anhang II, Nummer 4 Satz 2:

anstatt:

„Sie informieren die zuständige Behörde unter Verwendung des Formulars gemäß Abschnitt 4 ...“

muss es heißen:

„Sie informieren die zuständige Behörde unter Verwendung des Formulars gemäß Abschnitt 5 ...“

---
### Fw: Response to Request for Extension of Comment Period for Proposed Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur Ginger Tennant to: Sherry Russell 09/13/2011 02:54 PM History: This message has been replied to.

Could you please get this into the docket? Thank you!

Ginger Tennant Ambient Standards Group Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency C561E (mail drop C539-01) Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919.541.4072 Fax: 919.541.0237 ----- Forwarded by Ginger Tennant/RTP/USEPA/US on 09/13/2011 02:53 PM -----

From: Ginger Tennant/RTP/USEPA/US To: rsteinwurtzel@bakerlaw.com Date: 09/13/2011 02:53 PM Subject: Response to Request for Extension of Comment Period for Proposed Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur

Dear Mr. Steinwurtzel,

We have received and carefully considered your request for an extension of the comment period for the Proposed Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur. Due to the consent decree entered by the District Court for the District of Columbia, which governs the schedule for this review and requires EPA to issue a final rule by March 20, 2012, we do not believe there is time to extend the public comment period. We encourage you and your client to expedite the submission of your comments as much as possible. To the extent you submit your comments after the close of the public comment period, we will make every effort to consider them.

Sincerely,

Ginger Tennant Ambient Standards Group Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency C561E (mail drop C539-01) Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919.541.4072 Fax: 919.541.0237
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 5, 2007 |  | /S/ ROBERT J. HALLIDAY                              
|                        |  | Robert J. Halliday                                  
|                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3374 

To waive General Schedule qualification standards related to work experience 

for nurses at military medical treatment facilities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2023 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Mr. BUDD) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To waive General Schedule qualification standards related 

to work experience for nurses at military medical treatment facilities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘REWARD Experience 

5 Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3374 IS

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER WITH RESPECT TO EXPERIENCED NURSES 

2 AT MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILI3 TIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The hiring manager of a military 

5 medical treatment facility or other health care facility of 

6 the Department of Defense may waive any General Sched7 ule qualification standard related to work experience es8 tablished by the Director of the Office of Personnel Man9 agement in the case of any applicant for a nursing or prac10 tical nurse position in a medical treatment facility or other 

11 health care facility the Department of Defense who— 

12 (1)(A) is a nurse or practical nurse in the De13 partment of Defense; or 

14 (B) was a nurse or practical nurse in the De15 partment of Defense for at least 1 year; and 

16 (2) after commencing work as a nurse or prac17 tical nurse in the Department of Defense, obtained 

18 a Bachelor’s degree or graduate degree from an ac19 credited professional nursing educational program. 

20 (b) CERTIFICATION.—If, in the case of any applicant 

21 described in subsection (a), a hiring manager waives a 

22 qualification standard in accordance with such subsection, 

23 such hiring manager shall submit to the Director of the 

24 Office of Personnel Management a certification that such 

25 applicant meets all remaining General Schedule qualificaVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:06 Dec 04, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3374.IS S3374

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3374 IS

1 tion standards established by the Director of the Office 

2 of Personnel Management for the applicable position. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Frances C. GUISE, Appellant, v. Robert A. JOLIET and Gladys V. Joliet, his wife, Appellees.

No. 2198.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 10, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Executive Order 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

Rulemaking Document Title: / (H (rco0^ ^, u^iA 

RIN: '>^"^-/fg ' " '^ . , i/7y / / 

With respect to the attached rulemaking document(s): 

1. E.0.12866: The requirements of section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

____^ The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). 

^^^ ^ No substantive changes were made to the document(s) after it was submitted to OIRA. 

The required information is attached. 

2. CoDgressional Review: The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

for the submission of fmal rules to Congress and GAO (§ 801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

This document is not a final rule. 

_ This document is not a rule under (§ 804). 

The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

Name /N , / , ^ 

Title/Office / 

Date
#### Robert L. JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dora Mae JAMES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 6115.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Aug. 30, 1977.

Lewis O. Lauve and Blaise L. Hill, Alexandria, for defendant-appellant.

James D. Davis of Kramer & Davis, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CULPEPPER, GUIDRY and FORET, JJ.

FORET, Judge.

This is an appeal by a defendant-wife seeking to reverse a trial court judgment reducing alimony payable to her from $200 per month to $50 per month for the months of January, 1977 and February, 1977.

By judgment of divorce dated August 18, 1975, the trial court granted to Dora Mae James, appellant herein, the sum of Two Hundred ($200.00) Dollars per month in alimony beginning August 1, 1975, and payable monthly thereafter until further orders of the court.

*486On December 16, 1976, Robert L. James filed a rule for cessation of alimony payments on the grounds that he had recently had surgery and that his income was greatly diminished, while defendant was presently gainfully employed.

After a hearing on the rule, the trial court, on February 8, 1977, signed a judgment ordering that the alimony payment of plaintiff, Robert L. James, to Dora Mae James be decreased from $200 per month to $50 per month for the months of January and February, 1977, reserving the right to either party to reopen the matter and present further evidence for the month of March and following months with regard to the amount of alimony, if any, to be paid to defendant-in-rule, Dora Mae James.

The only issue before us at this time is whether or not the trial judge erred in reducing alimony payable to Dora Mae James from $200 per month to $50 per month for the months of January and February, 1977.

We find a reasonable evidentiary basis for the trial court’s reduction of alimony for the two months in question. While it is true that no medical evidence was presented, the learned trial judge had an opportunity to evaluate the testimony of the witnesses, and to observe the patent physical condition of the husband. Apparently he was convinced that the husband had some disability and loss of income during the two months in question. The reviewing court is not to reverse the findings of a trial court where a reasonable evidentiary basis exists for the holding of the trial court. *Canter v. Koehring,*283 So.2d 716 (La.1973).

We affirm the judgment of the trial court, and assess all costs of this appeal against the defendant, Dora Mae James.

AFFIRMED.
GEORGIA - AGENCY CONTACTS

1

GA LPA

*PDC 

member

Association of 

County

Commissioners 

of GA (ACCG)

Martha Revelo Legislative Associate (ACCG) Mrevelo@accg.org 404-917-7954

GA State

*PDC 

member

GA DOT

Andy Torrey

Planning Program 

Administrator AnTorrey@dot.ga.gov 404-631-1807

GA FHWA

*PDC 

member

FHWA EFL

Jacinda Russell Access Program Manager Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov 571-434-1543

GA FHWA FHWA EFL Lewis Grimm Planning Team Leader Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov 703-404-6289

GA FHWA GA FHWA 

Division Office

Neosha Lawhorn LPA Program Coordinator neosha.lawhorn@dot.gov 404-562-3634

GA FHWA GA FHWA 

Division Office

Ann-Marie Day Planning Team Leader Ann-marie.day@dot.gov 404-562-3639

GA FLMA NPS Kent Cochran Southeast

FLTP Coordinator

Kent_Cochran@nps.gov 404-507-5725

GA FLMA FWS Tommy Egland Regional Transportation 

Coordinator

Thomas_egland@fws.gov 503-487-7230

GA FLMA FWS

Nathan Beauchamp

US Fish and Wildlife Service 

Transportation Program 

Analyst

nathan_beauchamp@fws.gov 703-358-2226

GA FLMA USFS Paul Morgan Transportation System 

Operations- Region 8

pamorgan@fs.fed.us 404-347-1624

GA FLMA DOD(non-USACE) Douglas Briggs Senior Engineer/HNDSDDCTEADouglas.E.Briggs.civ@mail.mil 618-220-5229

GA FLMA DOD (USACE) Amy Cobb Natural Resources 

Management Program 

Manager

Amy.L.Cobb@usace.army.mil

251-581-4084
#### Johnnie Lee MITCHELL, Appellant, v. RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 77-238.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 5, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 8, 1978.

Leonard Sussman and Henry W. Ciar, Miami, for appellant.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Knight and Fred R. Ober, Miami,, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *The Wackenhut Corporation v. Canty,*359 So.2d 430 (Fla.1978), opinion filed April 4, 1978.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-222 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR MATERIAL 

Nonproliferation 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and LITHUANIA 

Signed at Vilnius February 22, 2011 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
LITHUANIA 

Nuclear Material: Nonproliferation 

 Agreement signed at Vilnius February 22, 2011; 

 Entered into force February 22, 2011.
NUMBER 13

- 18

- 00 631

- C V



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

THE NUECES COUNTY CI VIL

SERVICE COMMISSION

, Appellant,

v.

JOSHUA SORENSEN

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 3 47 th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas

.



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Appellant, the Nueces County Civil Service Commission, has perfected an appeal

from a judgment entered by the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause

number 2016DCV

- 5228

- H . Appellant filed a “Stipulation of Dismissal” advising this court

th at the parties have executed a settlement agreement and have settled all claims

. We2

construe this as a motion for voluntary dismissal of the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1). Appellant represents that appellee’s counsel is unopposed to the relief sought

by the motio n.

This Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s motion, is of

the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, appellant’s motion is

GRANT ED and the appeal is DISMISS ED

. Se e id. C osts of court shall be taxed against

appellant

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s

request

, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith

.

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

D elivered and filed the

19th day of December

, 20 19

.
Exhibit 99.1



                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Building
Materials Corporation of America (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), William W. Collins, as Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Company, and John F. Rebele, as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.




         /s/ William W. Collins-
-------------------------------
Name:  William W. Collins
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President

Date:  August 14, 2002




         /s/ John F. Rebele
-------------------------------
Name:    John F. Rebele
Title:   Senior Vice President and
         Chief Financial Officer

Date:    August 14, 2002


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.







                                       25
**Exhibit
      32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of iParty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350
      that to my knowledge:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
              and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The
            information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
            Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------













Date:
      May
      11, 2006


/s/
      PATRICK FARRELL


Patrick
      Farrell


President
      and Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 23, 2019

Order 

Clerk

October 23, 2019

157812(83)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 157812

v COA: 334024

Wayne CC: 15-010216-FC

ARTHUR LAROME JEMISON, Defendant-Appellant. 

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the second motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the 

time for filing its brief is GRANTED. The brief will be accepted as timely filed if 

submitted on or before December 13, 2019.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant, v. Clement TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellee.

No. 145.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 1, 1937.

Joseph A. McNamara, U. S. Atty., of New York City, William J. Hession, of Boston, Mass., Julius C. Martin, and Wilbur C. Pickett, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., and Keith L. Seegmiller, of Washington, D. C.

Ernest W. Gibson, Jr., of Brattleboro, Vt., for appellee.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,243
<ALLOWANCES>                                       313
<INVENTORY>                                      1,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,075
<PP&E>                                           2,247
<DEPRECIATION>                                     990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,609
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,455
<SALES>                                         27,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,883
<CGS>                                           22,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,754
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (19)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (73)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,533)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,533)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.76)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Feb-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Nov-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,427,044
<SECURITIES>                                        15,135
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,497,085
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (4,076)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,038,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              138,534
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            19,480
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,189,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,038,147
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,223,175
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,148,029)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.31)




</TABLE>