alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.1



 


Exhibit 4.1


PROMISSORY NOTE



	 	 	 
	Value: $1,000,000.00	 	
Dated: April 4, 2002



          FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ZIM TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL INC. (the “Debtor”)
hereby promises to pay on demand to or to the order of MICHAEL COWPLAND (the
“Holder”) in the City of Ottawa, Ontario at such address as the Holder may from
time to time direct, the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), in
lawful money of Canada plus interest as herein provided. Interest shall be
calculated on the principal sum outstanding at the rate per annum of five (5%)
percent and shall accrue to the date of payment.



          Notwithstanding the other terms hereof, the Debtor shall have the right to
prepay at any time and from time to time without a bonus all or any portion of
the amount outstanding, including interest, under this Note.



          The Debtor and all endorsers of this Note hereby waive presentment of
payment, notice of non-payment, protest and notice of protest.



          This Note and the obligations represented hereby shall be binding upon the
Debtor and its permitted successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit
of the Holder and its successors and assigns.



          DATED at Ottawa, this 4th day of April 2002.








	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SIGNED, SEALED & DELIVERED	 	 	 	)	 	 
	 	 	 	 	)	 	 
	 	 	 	 	)	 	ZIM TECHNOLOGIES
	 	 	 	 	)	 	INTERNATIONAL INC.
	 	 	 	 	)	 	per:
	 	 	 	 	)	 	/s/ James Stechyson
	 	 	 	 	)	 	

	 	 	 	 	)	 	Name: James Stechyson
	 	 	 	 	)	 	Title: Chairman
	 	 	 	 	)	 	I have authority to bind the Corporation
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04948**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04948\04948_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04948\04948_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04948\04948_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04948\04948_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04948\Certification Statement Plant ID 04948.pdf Plant certification statement x 04948\Supplemental Documents\04948_A5_Q3_WaterBalanceDiagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04948\04948_Checklist_102210_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04948\04948_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 04948\Supplemental Documents\04948_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SS. 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Technest Holdings, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
do hereby certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Gino M.
      Pereira
            
            /s/  Nitin V.
      KotakGino M.
      Pereira
              Chief Executive
      Officer
            
            Nitin V.
      Kotak
              Chief Financial
      OfficerDate: February 13,
      2009
            
            Date: February 13,
      2009
#### John W. DEMPSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-95.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 21, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Gary S. Hirstein, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of International Fuel Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated:    November 14, 2005 |   |                                            |
|----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                             |   |                                            |
|                             | By:    | /s/ Gary S. Hirstein                            |
|                             |   |                                                 |
|                             |   | Gary S. Hirstein                                |
|                             |   | Executive Vice President,                       |
|                             |   | Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary |
259 La. 64

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Raymond LOCKETT v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51529.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1971.

In re: Raymond Lockett applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title:    Agricultural Statistics Board calendar [electronic resource]
 
SuDocs Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> A 92.35/3:
Item    Number: 0122-B-51    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000869679
 
 
2010
2011
2012
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  May 21, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Application of BRISTOL SPRINGS CORPORATION for an Increase in Rates and Charges for Water and Sewer Service to its Customers in Palm Beach County, Florida, Petitioners, v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 41112.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 28, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Revenue Sharing Agreement For Texas



Exhibit 10.16 
 
 
STATE
REVENUE SHARING AGREEMENT 
FOR TEXAS

 
This Revenue Sharing Agreement (RSA) covers 33,000 specimens
received from the state of Texas. One-time RSA fee: $750,000 (seven hundred fifty thousand dollars). Minimum annual storage fee per specimen: $50.00 (fifty dollars). 
 
Term: A permanent RSA shall remain in effect as long as CRYO-CELL International, Inc., and/or any successor, continue to
store cellular specimens commercially. In the event of a merger or acquisition involving CRYO-CELL, this Agreement shall be grandfathered into the merger or acquisition transaction. 
 
Partner’s entitlement begins when RSA is paid in full and is 37 1/2 % (thirty-seven and one-half percent) of the annual
storage fees collected by CCEL. Partner will receive their entitlement within 30 days (thirty days) following the end of the quarter in which CRYO-CELL received the revenues. 
 

	 	  	 STATE REVENUE SHARING
PARTNER
	  	 Terms of State
 Revenue Sharing Agreement

	 Name:
	  	 Red Rock Partners or its Assigns                            
     

	  	 ($750,000)

	 Address:
	  	 209 Painted Cliffs Drive, Sedona, AZ 86336

	  	 $50,000 non-refundable deposit

	 Phone:
	  	 520-282-1257

	  	 Fax:
	  	 520-282-7782

	  	 Balance of $700,000 due in full on or before
 August 30, 2001.


 
From a portion of their
entitlement, Partner will equally bear the cost of billing, collection and/or credit card charges for annual storage fees. This has been limited to $2.50 per “paid for” stored specimen, of which the Partner will be responsible for $1.25,
and the Partner therefore will receive 37 1/2 % (thirty-seven and one-half percent) of the annual storage fees collected by CCEL. In no instance will Partner be ever called on for an additional cash infusion. 
 
CRYO-CELL agrees not to offer a RSA for the state identified above that will
negatively impact Partner’s entitlement. 
 
CRYO-CELL shall
have the opportunity to operate in the above state without a partnership after the 33,000 spaces have been filled. CRYO-CELL will, as soon as possible, refill any empty spaces that result from attrition from the 33,000 spaces, by immediately
allocating new storage specimens to the above Partnership until it has been refilled to 33,000 “paid for” spaces. 
 
CRYO-CELL will hold Partner harmless against any claims resulting from cellular storage activities. 
 
Terms of this Revenue Sharing Agreement cannot be changed unless mutually
agreed to, in writing, by the Partner and CRYO-CELL (or any successor entity). 
 
Agreed to this 30th day of May 2001. 
 

	 CRYO-CELL International, Inc.
	 	 	 	 Red Rock Partners

	
	 By:
	 	 /s/    Daniel D. Richard

	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/    Shirley C. Caris


	 	 	     Daniel D. Richard
     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	     Shirley C. Caris, General Partner

	
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/    Charles D. Nyberg

     Charles D. Nyberg, General Partner
#### Gladys COLCORD, Appellant, v. NATIONAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, now owned and/or controlled by Continental Casualty Company, Appellee.

No. 70-463.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. ER98-64-000 and EL98-4-000]


Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Metropolitan Edison 
Company and Pennsylvania Electric Company, PECO Energy Company, PP&L, 
and UGI Utilities, Inc.; Notice of Filing

October 15, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 3, 1997, the Pennsylvania Public 
Utility Commission filed a Petition Requesting Expedited Consideration 
and Acceptance of Forms of Retail Transmission Service Agency Agreement 
Necessary to Implement the Pennsylvania Retail Access Pilot Programs. 
Also, Metropolitan Edison Company and Pennsylvania Electric Company 
(doing business as GPU Energy), PECO Energy Company, and jointly PP&L, 
Inc., and UGI Utilities, Inc., filed their Forms of Retail Transmission 
Service Agency Agreements (Agency Agreements), including unbundled 
retail transmission rate schedules, that will be used to implement 
their retail access pilot programs. The Pennsylvania Commission and the 
Pennsylvania PJM Utilities request the Commission to grant expedited 
consideration so that the Agency Agreements may become effective on 
November 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before October 24, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27832 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Sandolio ALVAREZ, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-447.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 5, 1969.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; W. Rogers Turner, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3458 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the application 

of the in-office ancillary services exception to the physician self-referral 

prohibition for drugs furnished under the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 11, 2023 

Ms. SINEMA (for herself and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify 

the application of the in-office ancillary services exception 

to the physician self-referral prohibition for drugs furnished under the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Seniors’ Access to Crit5 ical Medications Act of 2023’’. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3458 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFYING THE APPLICATION OF THE IN-OFFICE 

2 ANCILLARY SERVICES EXCEPTION TO THE 

3 PHYSICIAN SELF-REFERRAL PROHIBITION 

4 FOR DRUGS FURNISHED UNDER THE MEDI5 CARE PROGRAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1877(b)(2) of the Social 

7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395nn(b)(2)) is amended by 

8 adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘With re9 spect to services consisting of drugs, and any supplies nec10 essary to administer such drugs, furnished on or after 

11 May 11, 2023, the requirement that such drugs and sup12 plies be furnished in accordance with subparagraph (A)(ii) 

13 in order to qualify as a case described in this paragraph 

14 shall not apply.’’. 

15 (b) WITHDRAWAL OF FAQS.—The Secretary of 

16 Health and Human Services shall remove the frequently 

17 asked questions and answers published on the website of 

18 the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on Sep19 tember 20, 2021, and May 19, 2023, which prohibit or 

20 seek to prohibit the arrangement described in the amend21 ment made by subsection (a) and those frequently asked 

22 questions and answers shall be deemed to have never been 

23 published. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Carl Eugene WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 38150.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gary S. Hirstein, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International FuelTechnology, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructionscontained in SEC Release 34-47986]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006         By:                        /s/ Gary S. Hirstein         Gary S. Hirstein          Executive Vice President,     Chief Financial Officer and     Corporate Secretary
3050

3050

3000

3050

3050

3050

2950

2950

2900

3000

3050

3000

2950

3000

3050

2950

2950

3050

US HWY 56

BB RD

RD AA

U RD

RD 24

RD V

RD Z

V RD

RD 21

RD 18

RD 22

RD 9

RD 23

AA RD

RD 25

RD BB

CC RD

HIGH SCHOOL RD

MAYS RD

RD 19

./56

./56

US HWY 56

BB RD

RD AA

U RD

RD 24

RD V

RD Z

V RD

RD 21

RD 18

RD 22

RD 9

RD 23

AA RD

RD 25

RD BB

CC RD

HIGH SCHOOL RD

MAYS RD

RD 19

./56

./56

Brollier

Airport

Moscow

Cave

O'Dea

Cemetery

Moscow

Cemetery

O'Dea

Cemetery

41

26

41

27

41

28

41

29

41

30

41

31

41

32

41

33

41

34

41

35

41

36

41

37

41

25

41

38000mN

41

26

41

27

41

28

41

29

41

30

41

31

41

32

41

33

41

34

41

35

41

36

41

37

41

25000mN

41

38

3

02 3

03 3

04 3

05 306 307 3

08 309 310 301 3

11000m

E

3

02 3

03 304 305 306 307 308 3

09 3

10 3

01000mE 3

11

520 000FEET

540 000FEET

1 540000

1 580 000

FEET

FEET

17'30"

20'

17'30"

20'

12'30" 10'

101°15' 12'30" 10'

101°15'

37°22'30" 37°22'30"

101°07'30"

101°07'30"

37°15' 37°15'

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

MOSCOW, KS

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

MOSCOW QUADRANGLE

KANSAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14S

Imagery.................................NAIP, July 2008 - August 2008

Roads.........................National Transportation Dataset, 2006

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2006

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Kansas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 19 ́

24 MILS

6° 49 ́

121 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14S

LG

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

Moscow

NW

Moscow SE

Hugoton

Ryus

Wagon Bed

Spring

Moscow

Woods

Wagon Bed

Spring SE

Woods NW

KANSAS
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

• 

residential streets

• 

residential streets

• 

• Figure 12

• 

• 

• 

• Death/serious injury is unacceptable: • Humans make mistakes/humans are vulnerable: • Redundancy is crucial:

This Case Study is part of the Safe Sy stem Approach for Spe ed Management Report: Click here to re a d the full report h e re.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

• Residential speed limit reduction:

• Setting target speeds:

Figure 13

.

.

.

.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

• Street redesign: 

• Intersection left turn calming

intersections.

• Automated speed enforcement

• Community outreach and education to 

.

.

.

.

.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

• Residential speed limit reduction

• Setting target speeds

• Street redesign

• Intersection left turn calming

• Automated speed enforcement

.

.

.
#### Johnny WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-8.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### BLUE RIBBON MEATS, INC., Petitioner, v. Mario FILIPPONE and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38537.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 9, 1969.

Jerry V. Wilkey, Miami, for petitioner.

J. H. Kaiser, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida *686Industrial Commission bearing date March 18, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorneys fees filed by Respondent is granted in the amount of $250.00.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.