alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21142-21143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8487]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE DEPARTMENT

[Public Notice 7815]

International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) Meeting Notice; 
Closed Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App Sec.  10(a)(2), the Department of State 
announces a meeting of the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) 
to take place on May 24, 2012, at the Department of State, Washington, 
DC
    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. App Sec.  10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552B(c)(1), it has been determined 
that

[[Page 21143]]

this Board meeting will be closed to the public because the Board will 
be reviewing and discussing matters properly classified in accordance 
with Executive Order 13526. The purpose of the ISAB is to provide the 
Department with a continuing source of independent advice on all 
aspects of arms control, disarmament, political-military affairs, 
international security and related aspects of public diplomacy. The 
agenda for this meeting will include classified discussions related to 
the Board's ongoing studies on current U.S. policy and issues regarding 
arms control, international security, nuclear proliferation, and 
diplomacy.
    For more information, contact Richard W. Hartman II, Executive 
Director of the International Security Advisory Board, Department of 
State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 736-4290.

    Dated: March 28, 2012.
Richard W. Hartman II,
Executive Director, International Security Advisory Board, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-8487 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
```
Use this checklist to review your Title VI Implementation Plan for program elements required under 23 CFR 200.9.

STANDARD DOT TITLE VI ASSURANCES

☐ Does the plan include a signed copy of the DOT Standard Title VI Assurances with Appendices “A,” “B,” 

“C,” “D,” and “E”? (This can be attached as an appendix to the plan) 

☐ Are the assurances signed with a current date? 

ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING 

☐ Does the Plan identify the Title VI Coordinator who has easy access to the head of the agency as well as 

others who have Title VI responsibilities in the agency (Title VI specialists and liaisons)?

☐ Is there an organizational chart that identifies a Civil Rights Unit, and its placement in the agency?

PROGRAM REVIEW PROCEDURES

☐ Does the Plan have a brief description of the recipient’s program areas, the Title VI responsibilities in each

program area and include procedures for conducting reviews of the program areas?

SUB-RECPIENT REVIEW PROCEDURES

☐ Does the Plan describe the process for determining how many and which subrecipients will be reviewed 

each year and the process for conducting reviews of subrecipients?

DATA COLLECTION – REPORTING – ANALYSIS

☐ Does the Plan contain a process for collecting, analyzing, and reporting Title VI data on race, color, national 

origin for each of its program areas and in the subrecipient reviews? (This may be more effective by 

including data collection/reporting/analysis by program area)

TITLE VI TRAINING 

☐ Does the Plan describe the process the state uses to conduct Title VI training of staff members and 

subrecipients?

COMPLAINT PROCEDURES

☐ Does the Plan contain complaint procedures which describe the process for investigations and disposition of 

Title VI complaints that conforms to the FHWA complaints procedures found in the FHWA Title VI 

Complaints Q and A?

DISSEMINATION OF TITLE VI INFORMATION

☐ Does the Plan contain community outreach and public education procedures as well as how the public 

outreach data is collected/analyzed to ensure effectiveness?

REVIEW OF STA DIRECTIVES

☐ Does the Plan describe how the STA reviews directives to determine if there are Title VI implications, and 

interpret how directives impact Title VI program areas?

COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES 

☐ Does the Plan outline Title VI Program compliance and enforcement procedures to address deficiencies or 

when noncompliance is determined for internal program areas and subrecipients?

LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY 

☐ Does the Plan explain how LEP populations are identified statewide and per project as well as how the 4-

factor analysis is applied to each in determining what translations are appropriate?

Title VI Implementation Plan Checklist
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             202                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,649                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (713)                      0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,466                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,215                       0
<PP&E>                                         138,018                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (84,019)                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,323                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,117                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             1                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (29,124)                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,323                       0
<SALES>                                        143,524                 133,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,524                 133,288
<CGS>                                          118,261                 112,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,261                 112,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,336                   6,236
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,676                  11,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,629                   3,419
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,315                   1,330
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,314                   2,089
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                  (1,029)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,314                   1,060
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-924 

________________________________________________________________________ 

FINANCE 

Tropical Forests 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and COSTA RICA 

Signed at San Jose September 24, 2010 

with 

Schedules 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 COSTA RICA 

 Finance: Tropical Forests 

 Agreement signed at San Jose September 24, 2010; 

 Entered into force September 24, 2010. 

 With schedules.
#### F. B. R. CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-929.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 12, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,384
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,654
<PP&E>                                         573,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                 222,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 366,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,185
<BONDS>                                        300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           158
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   366,251
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,648
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,829
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,611
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,512)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,099
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26


</TABLE>
# - - Response I)ave Lott('r1r Roher! I-IaCkilllllll Craig Fabiall I Regiullnl Airline Association AirlT~lft Owners 8.;I'ilots Association 

# +AA-20to -\~()9 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA hasthis ro 05al bJen discussed?

Organization Person

### Contacted Date Natioml1 Bu~in('ss A.ircraft Association Eli Cotti
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL CRUMP,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 154 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit  32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Daniels,
Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)  the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





(2)  the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.








Tactical
      Air Defense Services, Inc.Date
              By:
              /s/ Alexis
      KorybutAlexis
      KorybutPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive)
• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• Death/serious injury is unacceptable: • Humans make mistakes/humans are vulnerable:

SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

T his Case Study is part of the S a f e S y s t em Approach f or Speed Management Report : Click here to r e ad the full repor t here.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

Figure 15

• 

the red lines in Figure 15.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

• 

Figure 15. • 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

The evaluation found:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

•
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,179,496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    287,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,574,194
<PP&E>                                      17,707,468
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,632,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,421,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,037,012
<BONDS>                                      4,744,216
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,057
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,970,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,421,502
<SALES>                                        529,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,392,447
<CGS>                                          374,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,974,485
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               240,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,305,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (15,888,928)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (15,888,928)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (15,888,928)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.59)


</TABLE>
#### Francis LEVETT, Appellant, v. Fred D. WALTON and Harriet J. Walton, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-271.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 19, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 5, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE TWELVE  MONTHS  ENDED
SEPTEMBER  29,  1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000906473
<NAME>                        Starcraft Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-2-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-29-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,366
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                   51
<INVENTORY>                                    11,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23,448
<PP&E>                                         10,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 36,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,972
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       13,971
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   36,524
<SALES>                                        98,965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               98,965
<CGS>                                          83,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  83,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               15,049
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                130
<INCOME-TAX>                                   20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            110
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   110
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.03
        


</TABLE>
August 26, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HASSAN S. HOSSEINI , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00169

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________ ______________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certi fied below for observance.
Exhibit 12.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Pedro Beltran Nasr, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Grupo Radio Centro,
S.A. de C.V.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
      by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
      to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

      5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
      control over financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2004

                                                 /s/ Pedro Beltran Nasr
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Pedro Beltran Nasr
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3634 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3901 MacArthur Boulevard in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Dr. 

Rudy Lombard Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2024 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard in New Orleans, 

Louisiana, as the ‘‘Dr. Rudy Lombard Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DR. RUDY LOMBARD POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard in 

6 New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be known and designated 

7 as the ‘‘Dr. Rudy Lombard Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3634 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Rudy Lombard 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB