alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,436
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,196
<INVENTORY>                                      2,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,973
<PP&E>                                         459,830
<DEPRECIATION>                                 168,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,251,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,801
<BONDS>                                        743,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          160,742
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           416
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,251,038
<SALES>                                         48,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               464,724
<CGS>                                           31,791
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  545,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (849)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,418
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (176,236)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (47,094)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (129,142)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (140,909)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (3.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.43)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0030

WILLIAM M. SOLEM and ELLEN G. SOLEM,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appellant is granted an extension of time until April 28, 2023, to prepare, 

file, and serve its opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 21 2023

03/21/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0030
Order filed, July 17, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00225

- CR

____________ SAMUEL ALEJANDRO GA RZA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1270337



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due April 18, 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.
The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Jill Hamby , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
#### Fredi Herbert CLARKE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-518.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 27, 1970.

*487Jack R. Nageley, Lawrence S. Katz, Harvey S. Swickle, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Earl Fair cloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Clarke appeals from a conviction for aggravated assault and his sentence for five years.

After conviction, his request, by private counsel, for a pre-sentence investigation was not granted by the trial judge. He asserts the denial of this request was reversible error under Rule 1.780, “Cr.PR”, 33 F.S.A.

We do not agree. The rule requires the court under certain circumstances, to inquire into mitigating or aggravating circumstances prior to sentencing a convicted defendant. The rule requires in pertinent part:

> “When the court has discretion as to the penalty to be inflicted on the defendant, it shall, upon the suggestion of either party that there are circumstances which may properly be taken into consideration, * *

There was no suggestion here as to any mitigating or aggravating circumstances which the defendant wanted the court to properly consider in a pre-sentence investigation. The rule requires that some circumstances be presented to the trial judge for his proper consideration in order to show that there is a necessity or requirement for a pre-sentence investigation. This was not done in the instant case. No reversible error was committed, therefore.

We considered the other points raised by the defendant for reversal on appeal and find them to be without merit.

For these reasons the judgment and sentence herein appealed be and the same is hereby

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 10.23**

# ** **

# **EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL COUNSELING PROGRAM**

 

On February14, 2003, the Board of Directors approved a program to provide for executivefinancial counseling from The Ayco Company for a selected group of seniorexecutives.  The services provide a comprehensivereview of the participating executive’s financial situation, two personalcounseling sessions per year, income tax preparation, and unlimitedcommunications with Ayco.  The costs ofthese services will be borne by the Company, but approximately 60% of that costwill be considered imputed (taxable) income to the participant.  Participation in the program is entirelyvoluntary.

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20448 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HECTOR RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-904-4

-------------------- January 29, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Hector Rodriguez appeals from his 60-month sentence

following his guilty plea to aiding and abetting th e possession

with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1 ) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. He argues

that the district court clearly erred in determining that the

safety valve provision of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2 did not apply.No. 02-20448 -2-

W hen Rodriguez was arrested, he was seated in the r ear

passenger seat of a van with a loaded semiautomatic pistol resting

in plain view within his reach on top of a bag of marijuana in the

seat next to him. Relying on U nited States v. Wilson

, 105 F.3d

219, 222 (5th Cir. 1997), Rodriguez contends that the safety valve

provision was applicabl e because he did not actually possess the

w eapon and he may not be held responsible for the conduct of his

co-defe ndants, who were also seated in the van. Rodriguez's

reliance on Wilson is misplaced because the record shows at least

that he had joint and constructive possession of the firearm, and

we conclude that Rodriguez has not shown that the district court's

decision not to apply the safety valve was clearly erroneous. S ee

Wilson , 105 F.3d at 222; s ee also United States v. McKnight

, 953

F.2d 898, 902 (5th Cir. 1992) (firearms found in plain view

supported conclusion that defendant had constructive possession);

United States v. Vasquez , 161 F.3d 909, 910, 913 (5th Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED

.
EXHIBIT 10.5

                                LEHMAN BROTHERS


                                                              February 14, 2003



Westport Energy LLC
c/o Westport Investments Limited
Lyford Manor
Lyford Cay
P.O. Box N-7776 Nassau, Bahamas

Dear Sirs:

     Pursuant to the underwriting agreement (the "Underwriting Agreement") dated
December 10, 2002 among Westport Resources Corporation (the "Company") and the
underwriters listed therein, for the limited purpose described in the second
paragraph of this letter, Lehman Brothers Inc. hereby releases you from your
lock-up letter agreement delivered pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement.

     The foregoing release is effective solely with respect to the transfer of
up to 11,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock (the "Shares"). Your
agreement pursuant to the aforesaid letter agreement shall, except as aforesaid,
remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

                                LEHMAN BROTHERS INC.


                                By:  /s/ Emma Bailey
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Emma Bailey
                                     Title: Vice President
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3370 

To reauthorize the program on prenatal and postnatal health of the Centers 

for Disease Control and Prevention. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2023 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the program on prenatal and postnatal health 

of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Maternal 

5 and Child Health Through Substance Use Prevention 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3370 IS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAM. 

2 Section 317L(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

3 U.S.C. 247b–13(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘2019 

4 through 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2024 through 2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3424 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3424

 To reauthorize the program for strengthening communities of recovery 
             for individuals with substance use disorders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 2023

  Mr. Lujan (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Durbin, and Mrs. 
   Shaheen) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the program for strengthening communities of recovery 
             for individuals with substance use disorders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening Communities of 
Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING COMMUNITIES OF RECOVERY.

    Section 547 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290ee-2) is 
amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``building'' and 
        inserting ``strengthening'';
            (2) in subsection (d)(2)(A), in the matter preceding clause 
        (i), by inserting ``or strengthen'' after ``build''; and
            (3) in subsection (f), by striking ``$5,000,000 for each of 
        fiscal years 2019 through 2023'' and inserting ``$16,000,000 
        for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2005304EN.01001701.xml

| 23.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 304/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 304/17

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 November 2005

of appointing one Italian member and one Italian alternate member to the Committee of the Regions

(2005/811/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Italian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 January 2002 the Council adopted Decision 2002/60/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 January 2002 the Council adopted Decision 2002/60/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions (1).

| (2) | One seat as a member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr Luciano CAVERI, Vice-President of the Regional Council, member; one seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Rosario CONDORELLI, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

One seat as a member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr Luciano CAVERI, Vice-President of the Regional Council, member; one seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Rosario CONDORELLI,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the mandate still to run, namely until 25 January 2006:

| (a) | as a member:
  Mr Luciano CAVERI
  Presidente della Regiona autonoma Valle d'Aosta |
| --- | --- |

(a)

as a member:

Mr Luciano CAVERI

Presidente della Regiona autonoma Valle d'Aosta

| (b) | as an alternate member:
  Mr Rosario CONDORELLI
  Assessore Comunale del Commune di Sant'Agata Li Battiati (Catania). |
| --- | --- |

(b)

as an alternate member:

Mr Rosario CONDORELLI

Assessore Comunale del Commune di Sant'Agata Li Battiati (Catania).

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 14 November 2005

For the Council

The President

T. JOWELL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 26.1.2002, p. 38.

1

---
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3605 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to develop guidelines and best 

practices for local evacuation route planning, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2024 

Mr. PADILLA (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. SCHATZ, and Ms. HIRONO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to develop guidelines and best practices for local evacuation route planning, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Vehicle and 

5 Community Planning Act’’ or the ‘‘EVAC Planning Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EVACUATION ROUTE PLANNING. 

7 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

8 of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation, in consulta9 tion with the Administrator of the Federal Highway AdVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:31 Jan 20, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3605.IS S3605

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3605 IS

1 ministration and the Administrator of the Federal Emer2 gency Management Agency, shall develop and publicly dis3 seminate guidelines and best practices for States, terri4 tories, Indian Tribes, and units of local government to use 

5 when conducting transportation infrastructure planning to 

6 ensure necessary considerations for local evacuation route 

7 planning, including the routing of emergency response 

8 supplies, equipment, and workers, as part of natural dis9 aster preparedness efforts. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Cecil PERKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44239.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 16, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 279 So.2d 898.

ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52707-52708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26774]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-2-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

October 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 1, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets 
proposed to become effective on November 1, 1997:

.38 Revised Sheet No. 50

[[Page 52708]]

38 Revised Sheet No. 51
15 Revised Sheet No. 52
16 Revised Sheet No. 60
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 263
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 263A
First Revised Sheet No. 263B
First Revised Sheet No. 263C
Second Revised Sheet No. 263D
Second Revised Sheet No. 263E
First Revised Sheet No. 263H
Original Sheet No. 263H.1

    Northern states that the above-referenced tariff sheets contain 
proposed changes to the Carlton Resolution tariff provision.
    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Northern's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such petitions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make Protestant a party to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26774 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,221
<SECURITIES>                                    57,195
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,236
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (900)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,754
<PP&E>                                          11,998
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,392)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,461
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,768
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,675
<SALES>                                         24,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,066
<CGS>                                           16,811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,004
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,693)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,693)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.18)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Telegen Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
      Herring, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated
                as of February 23, 2007
            
            /s/
                Richard HerringRichard
                Herring
              Chief
                Executive Officer
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JANUARY 11, 2010

JOHN P. LEY

ACTING CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-14330

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 92-00026-CR-BH

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS A. DIAZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(January 11, 2010)

Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Diaz, pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the district court’s order

granting the Government’s motion for a sentence reduction from life to a 30-year

sentence. In his brief, he claims that, although he provided substantial assistance to

the Government, he did not receive any credit for his participation and did not

receive a sentence reduction.

Rule 60(b) provides that a “court may relieve a party or its legal

representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding” under certain

circumstances. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1)-(6). Rule 60(b), however, “does not

provide for relief from judgment in a criminal case.” United States v. Mosavi, 138

F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir. 1998).

In Mosavi, for example, a defendant appealed the district court’s denial of

his Rule 60(b) motion challenging an order in his criminal forfeiture proceeding.

Id. at 1365. We held that the district court lacked the subject matter jurisdiction

necessary to provide Rule 60(b) relief and affirmed the denial of that motion. Id.

We held that the “judgment and order that the defendant contest[ed] were entered,

not in a civil case, but in a criminal case, and a proper appeal . . . should have been

raised in the defendant’s criminal appeal of his conviction and sentence.” Id. at

1366.

Here, Diaz’s Rule 60(b) motion challenges an order in his criminal case. As

2
we held in Mosavi, the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion. Its

judgment denying relief is, accordingly,

AFFIRMED.

3