alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3215 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3215

 To conduct or support further comprehensive research for the creation 
           of a universal influenza vaccine or preventative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2023

Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Smith, and 
Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To conduct or support further comprehensive research for the creation 
           of a universal influenza vaccine or preventative.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flu Vaccine Act''.

SEC. 2. RESEARCH FOR THE CREATION OF A UNIVERSAL INFLUENZA VACCINE OR 
              PREVENTATIVE.

    (a) In General.--The Director of the National Institute of Allergy 
and Infectious Diseases shall conduct or support comprehensive research 
for the creation of a universal influenza vaccine or preventative.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--To carry out this section, 
there are authorized to be appropriated $200,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2024 through 2029.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jan OVERSTREETv. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50336.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 1, 1978.

• John D. Guyton, Brooks & Guyton, Kosciusko, for appellant.'

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Scherry J. LeSieur, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Board of Directors ofMTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

      We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No. 333-123147, and 33372269 on Forms S-8 and Registration Statements No. 333-123144 and 333-117549 on Forms S-3 of MTM Technologies, Inc. of our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated June 3, 2005, except for the fifth, sixth and seventh paragraphs of Note 2, as to which the date is June 8, 2005, and the eleventh paragraph of Note 10, as to which the date is June 23, 2005, related to the consolidated balance sheets of MTM Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2005, which report appears in theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of MTM Technologies, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2005.

GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLERLLPNew York, New YorkJune 29, 2005
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

PAUL JEROME OWENS, DOC #820823, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D17-2862 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 12, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; William D. Sites, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Opinion issued August 7, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01

- 14

- 00491

- CR

——————————— IN RE RONALD WAYNE S CHOFIELD , Relator

On Appeal from the 239th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 34910

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Ronald Wayne Schofield, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus,

challenging the trial court’s order denying his motion for judgment nunc pro t unc. 1

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Ronald Wayne Schofield , cause number 34910, in the 239th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, the Hon. Patrick Sebesta presiding.2 Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
```

[Federal Register: February 24, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 36)]
[Notices]               
[Page 8425]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24fe10-159]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6881]

 
Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice; FACA Committee meeting announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 
92-463, the Department of State gives notice of a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services. This 
Committee has been formed in fulfillment of the provisions of the 2006 
Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (Pub. L. 109-435) and in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The Committee 
meeting scheduled for Thursday, February 11, 2010, was cancelled due to 
inclement weather.
    Public input: Any member of the public interested in providing 
public input to the meeting should contact Mr. Chris Wood, whose 
contact information is listed under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section of this notice. Each individual providing oral input is 
requested to limit his or her comments to five minutes. Requests to be 
added to the speaker list must be received in writing (letter, e-mail, 
or fax) prior to the close of business on March 4, 2010; written 
comments from members of the public for distribution at this meeting 
must reach Mr. Wood by letter, e-mail, or fax by this same date. A 
member of the public requesting reasonable accommodation should make 
the request to Mr. Wood by that same date.
    Meeting agenda: The agenda of the meeting will include a review of 
the results of the October-November 2009 session of the UPU Council of 
Administration and other subjects related to international postal and 
delivery services of interest to Advisory Committee members and the 
public.

DATES: March 11, 2010, from 2 p.m. to about 5 p.m. (open to the 
public).
    Location: The American Institute of Architects (Boardroom), 1735 
New York Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20006.
    For further information, please contact Christopher Wood, Office of 
Global Systems (IO/GS), Bureau of International Organization Affairs, 
U.S. Department of State, at (202) 647-1044, woodcs@state.gov.

    Dated: February 17, 2010.
Dennis M. Delehanty,
Foreign Affairs Officer, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-3712 Filed 2-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
```
#### Arthur Earl KENNEY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50266.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 8, 1978.

Brown, Alexander & Sanders, Fimist J. Alexander, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Calvin Coolidge Williams, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Clarence E. Morgan, Jr., Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., INZER, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, BROOM and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
3100

3200

3100

3100

3100

3100

3100

3150

3100

3100

3100

3200

3250

3100

3100

3200

3100

3100

3200

3100

3150

3100

3100

3100

3100

3100

3100

3100

3100

3150

3200

3200

3100

3100

3100

3200

3100

3100

3100

3100

3100

3200

3100

3100

3100

3250

3100

3200

3100

3100

3200

3100

3100

3200

3150

3100

3150

3100

3100

3100

3200

3200

3100

3100

3250

3200

3050

3100

3100

CO RD 35

CO RD H

CO RD G

CO RD 33

CO RD D

CO RD 34

CO RD E

CO RD 35

CO RD H

CO RD G

CO RD 33

CO RD D

CO RD 34

CO RD E

SOUTHSIDE DITCH

SOUTHSIDE DITCH

ARKANSAS

RIVER

ARKANSAS

R

Bear Cr

Eveleigh

Farms

Airport

Morgan

Farms

Airport

41

83

41

84

41

85

41

86

41

87

41

88

41

89

41

90

41

91

41

92

41

93

41

82

41

94000mN

41

82

41

83

41

84

41

85

41

86

41

87

41

88

41

89

41

90

41

91

41

92

41

81000mN

41

94

2

81 282 283 284 285 286 288 289 2

80 290000m

E

2

82 283 2

84 285 286 287 288 2

89 290 281000mE

450 000FEET

480 000FEET

1 730000

1 760 000

FEET

FEET

47'30"

50'

47'30"

50'

27'30" 25'

101°30' 27'30" 25'

101°30'

37°52'30" 37°52'30"

101°22'30"

101°22'30"

37°45 37°45' '

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

LAKIN SW, KS

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

LAKIN SW QUADRANGLE

KANSAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14S

Imagery.......................................................NAIP, July 2008

Roads.........................National Transportation Dataset, 2005

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2006

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Kansas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 30 ́

27 MILS

6° 59 ́

124 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14S

KG

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

Syracuse

East SE

Lakin NW

Ulysses NW

Lakin

Ulysses NE

Lakin SW Lakin SE

Big

Bow NE

Kendall

KANSAS
First Amend. of the Sky Financial Group, Employee Stock Ownership Pension Plan



Exhibit 10.15 
FIRST AMENDMENT 
OF THE 
SKY
FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PENSION PLAN 
(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2001) 
 
WHEREAS, Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains
the Sky Financial Group, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Pension Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 
WHEREAS, the Company has delegated authority to amend the Plan to the Sky Financial Group, Inc. Benefit Plans Committee (the “Committee”), and the
Committee has determined that amendment of the Plan is necessary and desirable. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power reserved to the Company by Section 9.01 of the Plan, and by virtue of the authority delegated to the Committee,
the Plan, as previously amended, is hereby further amended, effective as of January 1, 2002, in the following particulars: 
 
1. By adding the following sentence to Section 1.03 of the Plan, immediately after subparagraph (e) thereof: 
 
“Notwithstanding the foregoing, Annual Compensation will
exclude any commissions any Employee or Participant receives from Celaris Group, Inc. or any successor.” 
 
2. By substituting the following for subsection (1) of Section 8.03(a) of the Plan: 
 
“(1) ‘Qualified Participant’
means a Participant who has attained age 55 and who has completed at least ten Years of Service (as that term is defined in the first paragraph Section 1.38 for purposes of determining eligibility to participate in the Plan). For purposes of this
subsection, all service that a Participant had with an Acquired Employer shall be credited toward Years of Service.” 
 
*        *        * 







 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, on behalf of the Committee, the undersigned Committee member has executed this amendment this 8th day of May 2002. 
 

	 SKY FINANCIAL GROUP,
INC.
 BENEFIT PLANS
COMMITTEE

	
	 By:
	 	  


	
	 Its:
	 	  




 

-2-
EXHIBIT 23.1
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements of
Hi-Rise Recycling Systems, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-48157) and Form S-8
(File No. 33-86260) of our report dated March 26, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Hi-Rise
Recycling Systems, Inc., as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years
then ended, which report is included in this annual report on Form 10-KSB.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Miami, Florida
March 26, 1999
#### Ramon SOTOLONGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-957.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 20, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Jr. Earl HICKMAN, Petitioner, v. Malcolm E. BEARD, Sheriff, Hillsborough County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-620.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 31, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

FL-01 Three Sisters Springs Access Driveway 

Constrution

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - 

Crystal River National 

Wildlife Refuge

City of Crystal River Citrus

FL-02 St. Johns River Ferry Service Ferry Operations 

Subsidy

National Park Service - 

Timucuan Ecological & 

Historic Preserve

St. Johns River Ferry 

Commission Duval

FL-04

J.N. Ding Darling National 

Wildlife Refuge Access & 

Safety Improvements

Shared Use Path 

Extension

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - 

J.N. Ding Darling National 

Wildlife Refuge

City of Sanibel Lee

FL-06

Multi Modal Link between 

Hobe Sound National Wildlife 

Refuge & Jonathan Dickinson 

State Park

Construction of 

Multi-use Trail

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - 

Hobe Sound National 

Wildlife Refuge

FL Department of 

Environmental 

Protection

Martin

FL-07

City of Pensacola Ferry 

Landing for Pensacola Bay 

Ferry System

Dock and 

supporting 

facilities 

Construction

National Park Service - Gulf 

Islands National Seashore Port of Pensacola Escambia

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Florida Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its initial, multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Florida FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Florida Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2013-2014
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. Funding for these projects is not guaranteed. Funding 

beyond 2014 is dependent on reauthorization of the Access Program by Congress. The Florida PDC does not have a firm date for the next call for 

projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. If you have any questions please contact David Payne, 

Access Program Manager, at 571-434-1543 or email at David.Payne@dot.gov.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration  Statement
Nos.  33-66366,  33-77372,  33-77374,  33-95924,  and  33-94030  on Form S-8 and
33-97774  and  33-96254  on Form  S-3 of our  report  dated  January  30,  1997,
appearing in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Wonderware  Corporation  for the
year ended December 31, 1996.





/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Costa Mesa, California
March 27, 1997

                                       
<PAGE>
AMENDMENT I
                              TO THE LANTRONIX, INC.
                                 2000 STOCK PLAN

WHEREAS,  this  Amendment  I  to  the  Lantronix,  Inc.  2000  Stock  Plan  (the
"Amendment")  shall  amend  and  become a part of the Lantronix, Inc. 2000 Stock
Plan  (the  "Plan").

NOW  THEREFORE,  in consideration of the promises and covenants made herein, the
Plan  is  amended  as  follows:

Section 2.  Definitions.  Paragraph (l) "Disability" is replaced in its entirety
            -----------
as  follows:

(l)     "Disability"  means  any  disability  that  results  in  termination  of
         ----------
employment.

Section  8.  Term  of  Option.  This  section  is  replaced  in  its entirety as
             ----------------
follows:

The  term  of  each Option shall be ten (10) years from the date of grant unless
otherwise set forth in this Plan.  An Option Agreement may provide for a shorter
term,  but  in  no  event  shall  an Option term be greater than ten (10) years.
Furthermore,  in no event shall an exercise period for an Option exceed the term
of the Option.  Moreover, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to an
Optionee  who,  at  the  time  the Incentive Stock Option is granted, owns stock
representing  more  than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of
all classes of stock of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary, the term of the
Incentive  Stock  Option  shall be five (5) years from the date of grant or such
shorter  term  as  may  be  provided  in  the  Option  Agreement.

Section  11.  Stock  Purchase  Rights.  Paragraph  (b)  "Repurchase  Option"  is
              -----------------------
replaced  in  its  entirety  as  follows:

(b)     Repurchase Option.  Unless the Administrator deter-mines other-wise, the
        -----------------
Restricted  Stock Purchase Agreement shall grant the Company a repurchase option
exercisable  upon  the  volun-tary or involuntary termination of the purchaser's
service  with  the  Company for any reason (including death or Disability).  The
pur-chase price for Shares repurchased pursuant to the Restricted Stock Purchase
Agreement  shall  be the original price paid by the purchaser and may be paid by
cancellation  of  any  indebtedness  of  the  purchaser  to  the  Company.  The
repurchase  option  shall lapse at a rate determined by the Administrator but in
any  event  shall  lapse  at  the  rate  of at least Twenty Percent (20%) of the
securities  per  year  over  Five (5) years from the date the option is granted.

WHEREFORE,  this  Amendment  shall  become  effective as of the date it is first
adopted  by  the  Board  of  Directors  of  Lantronix.
EXHIBIT 32.(A)

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Csaba Toro, the Chief Executive Officer of Euroweb  International Corp.
(the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2005 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
      Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


Dated: March 29, 2006



                                                  /s/Csaba Toro
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Csaba Toro
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          24,896
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,843
<INVENTORY>                                      2,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,360
<PP&E>                                         339,945
<DEPRECIATION>                               (115,357)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,078,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,107
<BONDS>                                        599,941
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           53,982
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           405
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,078,023
<SALES>                                         39,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               289,364
<CGS>                                           29,948
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  288,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (156)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,963
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (65,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,861)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (60,323)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (68,073)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.51)


</TABLE>
#### Sterling Curtis BOWMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44271.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 23, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 13, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 281 So.2d 35.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.

ERVIN, J.,

dissenting:

I believe we should treat the petition for writ of certiorari as one sounding in ha-beas corpus and require a return from the state. Where a plea of nolo contendere is substituted for a plea of not guilty the record should show if it was voluntary. See Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274. If the State’s return clearly shows the substituted plea was voluntary then the writ should be discharged. But if doubt exists an eviden-tiary hearing should be held.
**SCHEDULE TO EXHIBIT 10.22.2**

 

 

**AMENDMENTS TO WGI RETENTION AGREEMENTSWITH NAMED EXECUTIVES**

 

 

**EACH DATED AS OF AUGUST 20, 2002**

 

Stephen M. Johnson

George H. Juetten

Ambrose L. Schwallie

Thomas H. Zarges

 

 

NOTE:  The Amendment to Mr. Johnson’s Retention Agreement is identicalin all materials terms to those entered into with Messrs Juetten, Schwallie andZarges, with the exception that his Retention Bonus is prorated to allow forthe time during early 2001 when he was not in the Company’s employ.  Mr. Johnson returned to the employ of theCompany on November 12, 2001.

 

----