alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3640 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 155 South Main Street in Mount Clemens, 

Michigan, as the ‘‘Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3640 ES

1 SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT COLONEL ALEXANDER JEFFER2 SON POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 155 South Main Street in Mount 

5 Clemens, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lieutenant Colonel 

11 Alexander Jefferson Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate April 23, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3640 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostColonel Alexander Jefferson Post Office’’. Mount Clemens, Michigan, as the ‘‘Lieutenant al Service located at 155 South Main Street in
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                          China World Trade Corporation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

This Agreement dated 9 September, 2002 entered into between and by:

PARTY A: China World Trade Corporation of 4th Floor, Goldlion Digital Network
         Center, 138 Tiyu Road East, Tianhe, Guangzhou, the PRC 510620

PARTY B: Superwear Limited, c/o Suites 1201-4, Tower Two, The Gateway, 25-27
         Canton Road, Tsimshatsui, Hong Kong

                                    RECITALS

         Party A is a public company with business provided in the major areas
of business recreational club, online trading services, and trading brokerage
and agency services; and Party A owed Party B a total amount of US$220,000 (the
"Consideration Amount") resulting of the debt assignment from Yes Mind
Investment Limited.

WHEREAS:

1.       Party B agrees to convert the Consideration Amount that Party A owned
         into the shares of the common stock of Party A which shall rank
         pari-passu to the existing common stock; and Party A agrees to issue or
         cause to issue a total of 500,000 POST 30-TO-1 REVERSE SPLIT SHARES of
         its common stock to Party B for the settlement of the Consideration
         Amount (the "Transaction").

2.       Party A agrees to pay for all the expenses in relation to the issuance
         of its shares of common stock to Party B.

3.       Upon signing of this Agreement and the completion of the issuance of
         shares of the common stock of Party A to Party B, neither Party A nor
         Party B would claim the counter party for any form of additional damage
         and/or settlement regarding the Consideration Amount.

4.       Both parties agree to keep all information regarding the Transaction
         and its business or affairs which are known to the Parties in
         connection with this Agreement strictly confidential and shall release
         such information only to parties authorized by either party.

5.       This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Hong Kong Special
         Administrative Region and the Parties shall submit to the jurisdiction
         thereof.

For and on behalf of                        For and on behalf of
Party A                                     Party B

/s/ John Hui                                /s/ Authorized Signature
------------------------------------        ------------------------------------
Mr. John HUI                                For and on behalf of SUPERWEAR
                                            LIMITED Authorized Signature(s)
### Technical Service Report Sasol North America Inc. Research & Development 2201 Old Spanish Trail
TSR No. R&D ENV 10-004 01-10 Westlake, Louisiana 70669

To: Library

From: Geoff Russell Date: May 19, 2010

Title: ALFOTERRA® Surfactant: Environmental Fate and Effects

Objective: Determine aquatic toxicity of water sa mple from Porous Pot System, DOC Die-Away, and ALFOTERRA® 23-4S Surfactant.

Results: Acute 96-hour aquatic toxicity testi ng on fathead minnow is outsourced to Environmental Enterprise USA, Slidell LA. The table below summarizes the results for 10 reports

Results of fathead minnow 96hr acute toxicity test
Sample Description Environmental Enterprise USA Sample ID Survival NOEC % Survival LOEC % LC50 % (95% Confidence Interval)

PPS Blank

Influent Feed Q-642-09- 1336-38-1 12% 25% 14.7 % (12.4% - 17.5%)

PPS AES

Influent Feed Q-643-09- 1336-38-2 3.0% 6.0% 5.47% (4.91% - 6.10%)

PPS ALFO 23-4S

Influent Feed Q-644-09- 1336-38-3 6.0% 12.0% 9.48% (8.28% - 10.9%)

AES Neat (40mg/L active) Q-645-09- 1336-38-4 6.0% (2.4mg/L) 12.0% (4.8 mg/L) 13.8% (5.52mg/L) (12.3% - 15.5%)

ALFO 23-4S (40mg/L active) Q-646-09- 1336-38-5 3.0% (1.2mg/L) 6.0% (2.4mg/L) 7.76% (3.10mg/L) (6.64% - 9.08%)

PPS Blank Effluent Q-647-09- 1336-38-6 100% >100% >100% (NA)

PPS AES Effluent Q-648-09- 1336-38-7 100% >100% >100% (NA)

PPS ALFO 23-4S

Effluent Q-649-09- 1336-38-8 100% >100% >100% (NA)

ALFO 23-4S Q-715-09- 1336-58-2 6% 12% 8.8% (4.4mg/L)R&D ENV 10-004 01-10 Page 2

Die-Away (50mg/L) 0-day (3.0mg/L) (6.0mg/L) (8.0% - 9.7%)

ALFO 23-4S Die-Away (50mg/L) 28-day Q-716-09- 1336-58-1 100% >100% >100%

NA

Note: numbers highlighted in bold are Sasol NA notebook numbers. Concentrations in red are calculated as mg/L in the endpoint dilution value.
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2009-0686 Directorate Identifier: 2009NM044AD

MD11-28-126 ---3/3/09 MD11-28-126, R1 --- 6/18/09 MD11-28-126IN 02 ---7/1/09 MD11-28-126IN 03 ---7/15/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained inthe Supplemental AD Docket
MAY BEVIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 LindAve. SW, Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221
DURING THE HOURS OF: 9a.m. and 3p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03105/2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2344

ANTHONY LAMAR FISHBURNE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SARAH L. HAMILTON, SC DSS Child Support Specialist,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(6:14-cv-03572-TMC)

Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lamar Fishburne, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lamar Fishburne seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing his civil complaint against a caseworker at 

the South Carolina Department of Social Services. We dismiss 

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal 

was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on November 6, 2014, and the appeal period expired on December 

8, 2014. The notice of appeal was filed on December 9, 2014, 

one day late. Because Fishburne failed to file a timely notice 

of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 23.2




                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in this Form 10-K into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-3, File No. 33-81606; Form S-3, File No.
33-92520; Form S-3, File No. 333-13123; Form S-3, File No. 333-19139; Form S-3,
File No. 333-24607; Form S-3, File No. 333-31719; Form S-8, File No. 33-83452;
Form S-8, File No. 33-99556; Form S-8, File No. 333-29595; Form S-8, File
No. 333-72279 and Form S-8, File No. 333-71239.


                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Washington, D.C.
March 29, 1999
# L_2005029EN.01005701.xml

| 2.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 29/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 29/57

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 103/2005 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the internal market of paddy rice held by the Greek intervention agency

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 20 of 22 January 2005
  )

On page 5, Article 2(3):

for:

‘Tel. (30-10) 212 47 87 and 212 47 89

Fax (30-10) 862 93 73.’,

read:

‘Tel. +30(210) 212 48 46 and +30(210) 212 47 88

Fax +30(210) 212 47 91.’

---
3050

3100

3150

3050

3050

3150

3100

3150

3100

3100

3100

3100

3100

3050

3100

3050

3100

3150

3100

3100

3150

3050

3100

3100

3150

3150

3150

3100

3150

3100

3150

3150

£¤56

£¤56

¬«25

¬«25

¬«25

2

¬«25

MI RD 2MI RD

2MI RD

ROAD Y

1MI RD

6MI RD

ROAD V

ROAD 2

ROAD Y

ROAD V

1MI RD

ROAD 2

Wagon Bed

Spring NW

Moscow

Feterita Woods

NW

Wagon Bed

Spring SE

Wagon Bed

Spring

Hugoton

Wagon Bed

Spring SW

Moscow

NW

98 2

41

41

41

FEET

41

41

30"

41

000

41

2 FEET

2

41

2

41

FEET 3

41

2 2 2

41

15'

41

KG

41

2

20'

41

41

17'

41

000m

000m

2

2

30"

41

32

90

29

30"

41

35

26000m

22'

41

38

2

39

94

000m 3

37°

37°

41

1

E

2

2

38

LG

480

30"

101°

32

101°

000

41

35

41

000

22'

20'

34

LG

30"

41

22'

41

101°

27

33

28

29

41

KG

31

31

30"

30

33

17'

36

37

27

99

15'

30"

N

41

95 510

00

37°

540

20'

91 94 00

FEET

17' 15'

2 97

1

34

000

17'

92 E

580

30"

37°

37

22'

15'

20'

36

92 93 96 98

95 96

90

2

2

2

N

101°

28

30

99

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

KANSAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

WAGON BED SPRING SE, KS

2012

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

WAGON BED SPRING SE QUADRANGLE

KANSAS-STEVENS CO.

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.4

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Imagery......................................................NAIP, July 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2012

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 2006

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 14S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Kansas Coordinate System of 1983 (south

zone)

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

KG LG

3 00

14S

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2012 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 24 ́

25 MILS

6° 40 ́

118 MILS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Torbay Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, William Thomas Large, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 10, 2005                 /s/ William Thomas Large
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       William Thomas Large, President,
                                       Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                       Financial Officer
#### Robert BOHM, d/b/a Bob’s Construction v. CIT FINANCIAL SERVICE, INC.

No. 60302.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1977.

In re: Robert Bohm, d/b/a Bob’s Construction applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Tammany. 348 So.2d 132.

Writ denied. The judgment of the court of appeal is correct.
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Cygne Designs, Inc. (the  Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending January 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roy E. Green, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Roy E. GreenRoy E. GreenSenior Vice President-Chief Financial OfficerMay 23, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53662-53663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on 
Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a 
meeting on November 5, 1996, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate 
solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and matters 
the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: Tuesday, 
November 5, 1996--12:00 noon until 1:30 p.m.
    The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related 
matters. It may also discuss the qualifications of candidates for 
appointment to the ACRS and the status of appointment of new members to 
the ACRS. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze 
relevant issues and facts, and to formulate proposed positions and 
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff person named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, the 
scheduling of sessions open to the public, whether the meeting has been 
cancelled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on requests for the 
opportunity to present oral statements, and the time allotted therefor 
can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr. John 
T. Larkins (telephone: 301/415-7360) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 
(EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual one or two working days prior to the meeting to 
be advised

[[Page 53663]]

of any changes in schedule, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: October 8, 1997.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-27239 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Step 1                    Identify                    Stakeholders                

                    Step 2                    Use                    Safety Data                

                    Step 3                    Choose Proven                    Solutions                

                    Step 4                    Implement                    Solutions                

                    Finish Line                

# Systemic Approach Training – Part 2

Content will open in a new window

## Tools and Resources

Countermeasures
              - FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures
              - NHTSA Countermeasures That Work Tech Brief
              - Manual for Selecting Safety Improvements on High Risk Rural Roads
              - NHTSA Countermeasures That Work 9th Edition
              - Decision Tree Tools - COMING SOON
              - Decision Tree Example 1
              - Decision Tree Example 2

Training
              - Tutorial - Choose Proven Solutions
              - Systemic Approach Training – Part 2
              - Low-Cost Safety Improvements Training

Helpful Links
              - FHWA Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse
Facilities for Pedestrians & Bicycles 3R Maintenance-Resurfacing Planning/Study

$1.1M

$1.0M

$0.6M

FLAP Obligations/Expenditures by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$0 $0 $0 $340,071 $1,186,997 $825,501 $2,352,569

FLAP Loan/Credits by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$0 $0 $0 $0 $540,508 $1,600,000 $2,140,508

Programming Decisions Committee Members

Name Phone   E-mail Title

Christy Bernal 410-545-0412 cbernal@sha.state.md.us Transportation Alternatives Manager - ...

Steven Overbay 410-273-5708 ssoverbay@harfordcountymd.gov Member, County Engineers Associatio...

Jacinda Russell 571-434-1543 Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov Access Program Manager

Call for Projects information

Start Date End Date

No. applications

received

Total Access funds

requested

3/24/2014 7/25/2014 1 $452,500

1/19/2015 4/17/2015 6 $1,440,000

9/15/2016 12/16/2016 3 $2,251,083

Congressional District

MD-04

MD-06

MD-01

MD-02

$1M

$1M

Total project's costs by FLMA Accessed

NPS 64%

FWS 10%

FWS / NPS 26%

Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP)

Maryland

FLAP Allocations by fiscal year

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 TOTAL

$462,171 $465,643 $456,307 $499,215 $499,123 $441,359 $2,823,818

$4M

Local Match

19.89%

Projects Programmed

6

FLAP Funds Programmed

$2.7M

Federal Lands Highway Division

EFLHD

$336K

$117K
*This information is an overview of the FLAP projects information. It is subject to change at any time. For additional details or clarifications, please contact the Federal Lands Highway Division offices or visit the State FLAP 

webpage. 

Project ID Project Name- Description Improvement type Delivery Agency Delivery 

Year

MD FLAP DRCH STDY(1) Transportation study to increase access to NPS HATU 

and Blackwater NWR. Planning/Study Dorchester Co. w MSHA S&O 2018

MD FLAP WMSPT 63(1) Rehabilitating the roadway and sidewalks along MD 

63 and MD 68 in the Town of Williamsport, MD. 3R Maintenance-Resurfacing Town of Williamsport 2018

MD FLAP PG SUIT(1) Improve pedestrian crossing Facilities for Pedestrians & Bicycles Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division, FHWA 2017

MD FLAP DOT STDY(1) Perform context sensitive solution assessment study 

for 3 mile corridor of MD 355 near NPS MONO. Planning/Study Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division, FHWA 2017

MD FLAP MPA MSNCO(1) Develop a multimodal transportation feasibility study. Planning/Study STATE - MPA 2016

MD FLAP DRCH MPDM(1) MD FLAP DRCH MPDM(1) Planning/Study Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division, FHWA 2016
© 2018 HERE, © 2019 Microsoft Corporation

Project ID

MD FLAP DOT STDY(1)

MD FLAP DRCH MPDM(1)

MD FLAP DRCH STDY(1)

MD FLAP MPA MSNCO(1)

MD FLAP PG SUIT(1)

MD FLAP WMSPT 63(1)
#### Otis HUNTER et al. v. STATE.

No. 38128.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 215 So.2d 69.
#### Dennis M. O’CONNOR, Appellant, v. Mary Louise O’CONNOR, Appellee.

No. 77-2010.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 18, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 1978.

Dennis M. O’Connor, in pro per.

Richard C. Carter, Jr., Angelo P. Demos, Smathers & Thompson, Colson & Hicks, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The marriage of the parties to this appeal was dissolved July 3, 1972. The litigation was prolonged and bitterly contested. We note, however, that the judgment apparently was not appealed.

On July 21, 1977, the former husband filed below a petition for relief from the judgment pursuant to Rule 1.540(b)(4). The burden of the petition was that the judgment was void for want of jurisdiction because the wife did not, in fact, reside in the state for six months before filing the action. See Section 61.021, Florida Statutes (1971). Fraud upon the court is not alleged, nor is it alleged that the husband was without knowledge of the claimed issue at the time of entry of the judgment. The trial judge denied the petition and this appeal is from that order.

The trial court correctly determined that the issue was foreclosed by the final judgment, which was not appealed. See *Beaty v. Beaty,*177 So.2d 54, 57 (Fla.2d DCA 1965).

Affirmed.