alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARIZONA FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Arizona Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected the 

following projects for the Multi-Year Program of Projects. 

Project Name Project Type

Federal Land

Management 

Agency Accessed

Federal Land Unit 

Accessed

Tentative 

Fiscal Year for 

Delivery 

Delivery 

Agency 

Applicant 

(Owner Agency)

Control Road, Houston Mesa 

Road and Reynolds Creek 

Bridges

Bridge Replacement FS FS - Tonto National 

Forest 2013 CFLHD, FHWA Gila County / Arizona 

DOT

Lynx Creek Bridge, Thumb 

Butte Road , & Red Rock 

Loop Road & 

4R Reconstruction, 

Rehabilitation, Restoration 

& Rehabilitation

FS

FS - Prescott & 

Coconino National 

Forests

2014 CFLHD, FHWA Yavapai County

Three Forks Road (aka Alpine 

- Big Lake)

4R Reconstruction, 

Rehabilitation, Restoration 

& Rehabilitation

FS FS - Apache-Sitgreaves 

National Forest 2014 CFLHD, FHWA Apache County

Ash Canyon Crossing

4R Reconstruction, 

Rehabilitation, Restoration 

& Rehabilitation

FS / NPS

FS - Coronado Forest / 

NPS - Coronado 

Memorial

2014 CFLHD, FHWA Cochise County

Flagstaff-Vista Overlook (aka 

State Highway 89A)

4R Reconstruction, 

Rehabilitation, Restoration 

& Rehabilitation

FS FS - Coconino National 

Forest 2015 CFLHD, FHWA Arizona DOT

Lake Mary Road (aka as 

Flagstaff - Clint Wells)

4R Reconstruction, 

Rehabilitation, Restoration 

& Rehabilitation

FS FS - Coconino National 

Forest 2017 CFLHD, FHWA Coconino County

Farmers Bridge Bridge Rehabilitation FWS FWS – Cibola National 

Wildlife Refuge 2018 La Paz County and ADOT La Paz County

King Canyon Trailhead Trailhead and Intersection 

Improvements NPS NPS – Saguaro National Park 2018 CFLHD, FHWA Pima County

Martinez Lake Road/Red 

Cloud Mine Road

4R Reconstruction, 

Rehabilitation, Restoration 

& Rehabilitation

DOD / FWS / BLM

DOD - Yuma PG / FWS 

- Imperial NWR / BLM 

- Yuma

2019 CFLHD, FHWA Yuma County

Cattail Cove

4R Reconstruction, 

Rehabilitation, Restoration 

& Rehabilitation

BOR BOR-Lake Havasu 2019 CFLHD, FHWA AZ State Parks
Project Name Project Type

Federal Land

Management 

Agency Accessed

Federal Land Unit 

Accessed

Tentative 

Fiscal Year for 

Delivery 

Delivery 

Agency 

Applicant 

(Owner Agency)

Apache Trail

3R - Rehabilitation, 

Restoration & 

Rehabilitation

FS FS – Tonto National 

Forest 2020 CFLHD, FHWA Arizona DOT

Mormon Lake Road

4R Reconstruction, 

Rehabilitation, Restoration 

& Rehabilitation

FS FS - Coconino National 

Forest 2020 CFLHD, FHWA Coconino County

Eager to Crescent Lake

3R - Rehabilitation, 

Restoration & 

Rehabilitation

FS

FS – Apache 

Sitgreaves National 

Forest

2021 CFLHD, FHWA Arizona DOT

Chiricahua Access Road

3R - Rehabilitation, 

Restoration & 

Rehabilitation

NPS NPS – Chiricahua 

National Monument 2022 CFLHD, FHWA Arizona DOT

Funding for these projects is based on availability of funds. If you have any questions please contact Chris Longley, Federal Lands Access Program Manager, at 720-963-

3733 or email at Christopher.Longley@dot.gov.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3183 

To consider, for purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act, that 

officers, officials, representatives, spokespersons, and members of Hamas, 

Palestine Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS, and individuals 

who endorse or espouse terrorist activities conducted by such organizations are engaged in terrorist activity. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2023 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. BUDD, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, and 

Ms. LUMMIS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To consider, for purposes of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act, that officers, officials, representatives, spokespersons, and members of Hamas, Palestine Islamic 

Jihad, Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS, and individuals 

who endorse or espouse terrorist activities conducted by 

such organizations are engaged in terrorist activity. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Terrorist Inadmis5 sibility Codification Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3183 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF HAMAS, PALESTINE ISLAMIC JIHAD, 

2 HEZBOLLAH, AL-QAEDA, AND ISIS OFFICIALS 

3 AND MEMBERS AMONG ALIENS ENGAGED IN 

4 TERRORIST ACTIVITY. 

5 Section 212(a)(3)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)) is amended, in the 

7 undesignated matter following subparagraph (IX), by 

8 striking ‘‘or spokesman of the Palestine Liberation Orga9 nization’’ and inserting ‘‘spokesperson, or member of the 

10 Palestine Liberation Organization, Hamas, Palestine Is11 lamic Jihad, Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, or any successor 

12 or affiliate group, or who endorses or espouses terrorist 

13 activities conducted by any of the aforementioned 

14 groups,’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATION
OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




I,
David Koos, Chief Financial Officer of Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc.
(“Registrant”) certify that:




1. I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Registrant.




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. 
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and
have:




(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:   August
      20, 2009
                By:
                /s/ David
      R. KoosDavid
      R. KoosActing
      Chief Financial
Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-11233

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JEFFERY ELLIOTT STEES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:10-CR-56-1

Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jeffery Elliott Stees

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Stees has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 21, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-11233 Document: 00511963830 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 18, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00435

- CV

Everett W. GREGORY Jr. and Marcia Gregory

,

Appellants

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and Jesse R. Mendoza,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicia l District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CI05064

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed o n or before October 1 4 , 2015 ; however, it has not yet been filed. Because no brief has been filed, it is ORDERED appellant show cause in writing

within ten days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a).

Response should include a reasonable explanation for fail ure to timely file the brief and

should demonstrate affirmative steps tak en to remedy the deficienc y . If appellant intend s for the response to act as a motion for extension of time, it must comply with Rule 10.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Fourth Court of Appeals ’ local rules. If appellant no longer wish es to pursue this appeal, the response should include a motion to dismiss.

If this Court does not receive an adequate response within ten days, the appeal will be

dismiss ed for want of prosecution

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8( a )( 1 ).

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justi ce

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of October, 20 16

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Cl erk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28517]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

October 21, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Special Request: In order to conduct the survey described below in 
November 1997 timeframe, the Department of the Treasury is requesting 
that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approve this 
information collection by November 3, 1997. To obtain a copy of this 
study, please contact the Internal Revenue Service Clearance Officer at 
the address listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1432.
    Project Number: M:SP:V 97-022-G.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: 1997 Telephone Routing Interactive System (TRIS) View Debit 
Application Customer Satisfaction Survey.
    Description: The purpose of the survey is to assess the level of 
ease and satisfaction with using the View Debit application.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,260.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 1 minute.
    Frequency of Response: Other (one time only).
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 21 hours.

    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-28517 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
State Project Applicant Description Funding Amount 

MS Natchez Trace Parkway Pavement Rehabilitation National Park Service Rehabilitate an 83‐mile section of the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi from milepost 121 to 

204 $54,278,000.00

AK

Native Village of Eyak ‐ Marine Tribal 

Transportation and Shepard Point Oil Spill 

Response Facility

The Native Village of 

Eyak

Development of a highway extension that will connect to Cordova’s existing road system at Orca 

Creek and to Shepard Point, a deep‐draft dock, a small boat launch ramp, 3.5‐acre pad, and 

uplands facilities

$45,722,000.00

Total $100,000,000.00

FY2021 National Significant Federal Lands and Tribal Projects Program Selected Projects
# EUR-Lex - 32005M3794 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005M3794

**Commission Decision of 19/05/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3794 - PAI / FTE) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

| |Brussels, 19/05/2005

SG-Greffe(2005) D/202181

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject : Case No. COMP/M. 3794 – PAI/FTE Notification of 08.04.2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C.91 of 15.04.2005, p. 2.

1. On 08.04.2005 , the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which the undertaking PAI Partners S.A.S. (“PAI”, France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking FTE Verwaltungs GmbH (“FTE”, Germany), by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for PAI: provision of investment and management advice and management of investment funds;

- for FTE: production and sale of automotive components.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph b, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004[2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

(signed)

Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

**FORM N-PX**

**ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF**

**DWS GNMA Fund**

**A Series of DWS Income Trust**

Investment Company Act file number  811-4049

DWS Income Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

John Millette

Secretary

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA  02110

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  617-295-1000

Date of fiscal year end:  09/30

Date of reporting period:  7/1/07-6/30/08

Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.

 
```

******************************* FORM N-Px REPORT *******************************

ICA File Number: 811-04049
Reporting Period: 07/01/2007 - 06/30/2008
DWS Income Trust

============================== B    DWS GNMA FUND ==============================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND

========== END NPX REPORT
```

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the annual report of Cygne Designs, Inc. (the  Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending January 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roy E.
Green, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Roy E. GreenRoy E. GreenSenior Vice President-Chief Financial OfficerApril 29, 2005
DWS VARIABLE SERIES I

    SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUS OF THE LISTED PORTFOLIO:

                             ----------------------

                          DWS Global Opportunities VIP



Effective immediately, the following information replaces similar
information about the portfolio management team in the "Portfolio
management" section of the portfolio's prospectuses:

The portfolio is managed by a team of investment professionals who
collaborate to implement the portfolio's investment strategy. The
portfolio manager on the team has authority over all aspects of the
portfolio's investment portfolio, including, but not limited to,
purchases and sales of individual securities, portfolio construction
techniques, portfolio risk assessment and the management of daily cash
flows in accordance with portfolio holdings.

The following person handles the day-to-day management of the
portfolio:

  Joseph Axtell, CFA
  Managing Director of Deutsche Asset Management and
  Portfolio Manager of the portfolio.
   o Joined Deutsche Asset Management in 2001 and the
     portfolio in 2002.
   o Senior analyst at Merrill Lynch Investment Managers
     for the international equity portion of a global
     balanced portfolio (1996-2001).
   o Director, International Research at PCM International
     (1989-1996).
   o Associate manager, structured debt and equity group
     at Prudential Capital Corporation (1988-1989).
   o Analyst at Prudential-Bache Capital Funding in London
     (1987-1988).
   o Equity analyst in the healthcare sector at Prudential
     Equity Management Associates (1985-1987).
   o BS, Carlson School of Management, University of
     Minnesota.











           Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference




                                                                     [Logo]DWS
                                                                   INVESTMENTS
                                                           Deutsche Bank Group

August 14, 2009
VS-3628
#### Eddie D. GRANT, Appellant*,*v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-390.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 22, 1970.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Vera Winter Lee, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Thomas B. Calhoun, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

SPECTOR, Judge.

A trial jury rendered its verdict finding that appellant committed a robbery at the ABC Liquor Store in Tallahassee, Florida, on February 5, 1970. Appellant now seeks reversal of the judgment and sentence imposed upon him in consequences of the jury’s verdict.

The sole question raised on the appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence identifying appellant as the person who perpetrated the robbery. We hold that the ground thus raised for reversal is without merit. A review of the testimony reveals that the evidence of appellant’s guilt is legally sufficient. The manager at the store, Mr. Mike Malloy, identified the appellant as the person who committed the robbery. Mal-loy testified that appellant was in the store twice the same night, the robbery occurring on appellant’s second visit. Malloy stated that appellant was within a few feet of him and he was able to look right in his face.

Appellant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient seems centered upon the proposition that Malloy’s identifying testimony is based only upon the hat and coat which appellant was wearing at the time he was apprehended. These items were said to be the same as those worn by the robber on the occasion of the robbery two days earlier. If the garments were the only evidence identifying appellant as the robber, appellant’s argument might give cause for concern. However, the hat and coat were only corroborating evidence which tended to support Malloy’s basic evidence on identity that he recognized appellant directly as being the person who committed the robbery. At the time appellant was apprehended, he was in the company of a female companion. Shortly before the apprehension, appellant and his female companion were observed at the bus station by Mr. Malloy as he was driving by. Appar*170ently appellant was aware that Malloy had observed him, since the girl testified that appellant had told her that he had seen somebody who recognized him and that he had to leave. In her own words, the witness stated that “Eddie (appellant) said that there goes the man who he robbed his store that Thursday night and so he said the man recognized him and he recognized the man because he had glasses on.” It was shortly after this that appellant was arrested outside of Crump’s Tavern where his efforts to elude capture were unsuccessful.

The evidence amply supported the verdict of guilt. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON, J., concur.