Independent Accountants' Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures



To Household Finance Corporation:

We have performed procedures enumerated below in items A. and B. in
conjunction with Section 3.06 of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated August 1, 1993, as amended and supplemented (the
"Agreement").

A.  We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated financial statements of Household
Finance Corporation (the "Servicer") and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996, and have issued our report thereon dated January
23, 1997.  We have not audited any financial statements of the
Servicer as of any date or for any period subsequent to December
31, 1996, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date
of our report on those statements.

       In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention
that caused us to believe that the Servicer was not in compliance
with any of the terms, covenants, provisions, or conditions in
Sections 3.01, 3.02, 3.04, 3.09, 3.10, 4.02, 4.03, 4.04, and 8.08
(to the extent such sections are applicable to Household Finance
Corporation as Servicer) of the Agreement, or Sections 3, 4.08,
4.09, 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, and 4.17 (to the
extent such sections are applicable to Household Finance
Corporation as Servicer) of the Series 1993-B, Series 1993-1,
Series 1993-2, Series 1993-3, Series 1994-1, Series 1994-2, Series
1995-1, Series 1996-A, and Series 1996-B Supplements, in
conjunction with the servicing of consumer revolving credit card
receivables owned by the Household Affinity Credit Card Master
Trust I insofar as they relate to accounting matters.  It should be
noted, however, that our audit was not directed primarily toward
obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance.

       As a part of our audit, we obtained an understanding of the
Servicer's internal control structure over the Servicer's entire
consumer revolving credit card portfolio, including those loans
serviced under the Agreement, and the related Supplements, to the
extent considered necessary in order to assess control risk as
required by generally accepted auditing standards.  The purpose of
our consideration of the internal control structure, which includes
the accounting systems, was to determine the nature, timing, and
extent of the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an
opinion on the financial statements. Such audit procedures,
however, were not performed in order to express a separate opinion
on the Household Affinity Credit Card Master Trust I.

       Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in records
relating to credit card receivables serviced by the Servicer that,
in our opinion, Section 3.06 of the Agreement required us to
report.

B.   We have performed the procedure described in the following
paragraph, which was agreed to by the management of the Servicer,
the Bank of New York as Trustee, and the Credit Enhancement
Provider (together, the "Specified Users"), with respect to Section
3.06 of the Agreement, in conjunction with the servicing of
consumer revolving credit card receivables owned by the Household
Affinity Credit Card Master Trust I.  This agreed-upon procedure
was performed in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  The
sufficiency of the procedure is solely the responsibility of the
Specified Users of the report.  Consequently, we make no
representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedure described
below either for the purpose for which this report has been
requested or for any other purpose.

       The procedure and associated findings are as follows:

       From the Monthly Servicer's Certificates prepared by the
Servicer between January, 1996 and December, 1996, we selected the
following months and performed the following:

       We compared the mathematical calculation of each amount set
forth in the Monthly Servicer's Certificates to the Servicer's
computer reports for the month of April, 1996, for Series 1993-B,
Series 1993-1, Series 1993-2, Series 1993-3, Series 1994-1, Series
1994-2, Series 1995-1, Series 1996-A and  for the month of August,
1996, for Series 1996-B and found them to be in agreement.  Our
comparisons were based on records provided to us by the Servicer
and the methodology set forth in the Agreement.

With respect to the procedure performed in item B. above, we were
not engaged to, and did not, perform an audit, the objective of
which would be the expression of an opinion on the Monthly 
Servicer's Certificates described above.  Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.  Had we been engaged to perform additional
procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that
would have been reported to you.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the
Specified Users and should not be used for any other purpose.




Chicago Illinois
March 26, 1997