Florida

Highway Safety Improvement Program

2016 Annual Report

Prepared by: FL
ii

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery & Admission into Evidence

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section [HSIP], shall not be 

subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered 

for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or 

addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.” 

23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, 

or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety 

enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway 

crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any 

highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid 

highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State 

court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any 

occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.”
iii

Table of Contents

Disclaimer...................................................................................................................................................... ii

2. Executive Summary................................................................................................................................... 1

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3

Program Structure ........................................................................................................................................ 3

Program Administration ........................................................................................................................... 3

Program Methodology.............................................................................................................................. 5

Progress in Implementing Projects............................................................................................................... 9

Funds Programmed............................................................................................................................... 9

General Listing of Projects.................................................................................................................. 12

Progress in Achieving Safety Performance Targets .................................................................................... 21

Overview of General Safety Trends........................................................................................................ 21

Application of Special Rules.................................................................................................................... 36

Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Improvements (Program Evaluation) ..........................................38

SHSP Emphasis Areas.............................................................................................................................. 40

Groups of similar project types............................................................................................................... 44

Systemic Treatments............................................................................................................................... 45

Project Evaluation....................................................................................................................................... 47

Glossary....................................................................................................................................................... 66
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

1

2. Executive Summary

The Florida Department of Transportation continues the critical work of providing a safe transportation 

system for the residents and visitors of Florida. The primary instrument which guides this work is the 

state’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan. The plan identifies the main types of crashes which stakeholders 

through input and data analysis have selected as areas which require a suite of countermeasures to 

address. The plan directs the engineering, education, enforcement and emergency services, or the “4 

E’s” in their collective efforts to reduce fatal and serious injury crashes. When countermeasures from 

the 4 E’s are applied to a crash type, the reductions gained are typically greater than if just one type of 

countermeasure were applied. This holistic approach to transportation safety represents the best value 

for taxpayers. The plan is divided into individual Emphasis Areas, whose goal is to reduce a specific type 

of crash. The overall goal of the plan is to reduce fatal and serious injuries. The plan is divided into nine 

emphasis areas; Lane Departure, Intersections, Aggressive Driving, Teen Drivers, Drivers age 65 and 

Older, Impaired Driving, Pedestrians and Bicyclists, Motorcycles and Distracted Drivers. The goal of the 

plan is to achieve a 5% reduction in the 5 – year rolling average of fatal and serious injury crashes, both 

overall and within each emphasis area. 

The department received an allocation of $110 million in Highway Safety Improvement Program funds 

during the 2015 state fiscal year, which began on July 1, 2015, and ended on June 30, 2016 (Q.17, Pg. 9). 

This funding was used to complete 225 projects which were in various stages of planning, design, 

construction or close-out. 94 of these projects were construction projects or safety projects which 

significantly advanced the state’s plan. $19 million of the funds were used for projects on local roadways 

(Q.18, Pg. 9). Additionally, $3 million in funding was used for systemic projects, which not only address 

locations experiencing a high frequency of crashes, but areas which represent a high risk of experiencing 

crashes in the future (Q.12, Pg.8). 

All projects funded through the Highway Safety Improvement Program are required to be focused on 

addressing crashes in one of the plan’s emphasis areas. The Intersections emphasis area had 46 projects, 

totaling $40 million in funding, the Lane Departure emphasis area had 14 projects, totaling $30.9 million 

in funding and the Pedestrian and Bicyclist emphasis area had 9 projects, totaling $5.6 million in funding 

(Q.23, Pgs. 11 – 19). A caveat for these figures is that one project frequently deploys multiple 

countermeasures, which may benefit multiple emphasis areas. These figures should be considered 

minimums and not explicit counts of the projects and countermeasures for each emphasis area. 

The department conducted a project evaluation to determine the effectiveness of HSIP funded projects 

from calendar year 2011. The evaluation used crash data from 3 years before and after a project was 

constructed, excluding 1 year around the construction dates. Using a benefit / cost analysis procedure, 

the evaluation showed that the projects resulted in $7 of benefits for every $1 of HSIP funds spent. 

When comparing the before period to the after period, the projects resulted in a reduction of 712 target 

crashes, 5 fatal crashes and 217 injury crashes. The projects included 14 locations which received rumble 

striping to warn drivers that they are nearing the edge of the roadway or crossing the centerline, which 

resulted in a societal benefit of $14.66 for every dollar invested, 215 fewer target crashes, 11 fewer 

fatalities and 57 fewer injury crashes. Target crashes are determined by the type of countermeasure 

deployed; an example of which is measuring the change in run off the road crashes for rumble striping 

projects (Q.36, Pgs 47 – 64). 
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

2
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

3

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of 

achieving a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 

148(h) and 23 CFR 924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to advance 

HSIP implementation and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the HSIP MAP21 Reporting Guidance dated February 13, 2013 and consists of four sections: program structure, 

progress in implementing HSIP projects, progress in achieving safety performance targets, and 

assessment of the effectiveness of the improvements. 

Program Structure

Program Administration

3. How are Highway Safety Improvement Program funds administered in the State? 

Central

4. Describe how local roads are addressed as part of Highway Safety Improvement Program.

Due to changes in the Florida Traffic Crash Report, Long Form, the State Safety Office (SSO) was unable 

to develop a high crash location list for local roads during the reporting period. However, the SSO 

supported the districts with identifying high crash locations on local roads through Geographic 

Information Systems (GIS) analysis. The SSO developed several analyses of pedestrian and bicyclist 

involved crashes and intersection crashes. The department is working towards developing a 

replacement system that will once again provide high crash listings on local roads.

Additionally, other local projects are identified through a coordinated effort with the District Safety 

Engineer and the Community Traffic Safety Teams. 

5. Identify which internal partners are involved with Highway Safety Improvement Program planning. 

Design

Planning

Operations

Governors Highway Safety Office

6. Briefly describe coordination with internal partners. 

District staff coordinate with planning, design, and operations for planning HSIP projects. Central Office 

staff then coordinates with District staff on programming and funding projects. District staff look at 
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

4

opportunities to program HSIP project components concurrently with other projects in the 

Department's work program. 

Other HSIP planning activites include efforts with the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). Special 

emphasis areas teams have been formed based on the SHSP structure. Each team is made up of key 

personnel within the department and from other agencies or groups which have an interest or 

responsibility in the emphasis area. The teams meet to develop goals, objectives and action items using 

the SHSP as the guiding principle. Quarterly meetings are held to discuss progress on action items, plan 

new work and share best practices. 

Additionally, the following groups are included in the internal coordination of the HSIP program: Bike 

and Pedestrian Safety Manager, State Safety Office, Safe Routes to School Program, Local Agency 

Program and Work Program Office. 

7. Identify which external partners are involved with Highway Safety Improvement Program planning. 

Metropolitan Planning Organizations

Local Government Association

Other-Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST)

8. Identify any program administration practices used to implement the HSIP that have changed since 

the last reporting period.

Other-None

9. Describe any other aspects of Highway Safety Improvement Program Administration on which you 

would like to elaborate.

The HSIP program is centrally managed for both funding and administration of the program. Each district 

is responsible for submitting projects for funding consideration annually. The State Safety Office reviews 

district submitted projects annually and determines funding based on need, project priorities and the 

Net Present Value (NPV) of an individual project. 
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

5

Program Methodology

10. Select the programs that are administered under HSIP. 

Intersection Bicycle Safety Skid Hazard

Pedestrian Safety Other-Lane Departure

11. Program: Intersection

Date of Program Methodology: 9/1/2007

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only

Traffic Other-Mile Point

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

No

If no, describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

The same overall process is used, excluding traffic volume data and crash rates. 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Other-Districts coordinate with staff for projects and submit to Central Office for approval.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

A score is provided for each 

project that includes the 

following: Benefit Cost Ratio 

greater than 1, Net Present Value 

greater than 0 and is on the High 

Crash Intersection List.
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

6

11. Program: Bicycle Safety

Date of Program Methodology: 9/12/2012

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only

Population

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Other-Projects are identified using GIS analysis of crash locations and frequency.

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process

Other-Locations are identified through GIS analysis by Central Office or vetted through the districts. 

District submitted projects are evaluated using a Benefit Cost Ratio greater than 1.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Cost Effectiveness 1

11. Program: Skid Hazard

Date of Program Methodology: 9/1/2007

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only

Traffic Other-Friction Number

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Other-Locations with a high proportion of wet weather crashes are included in the screening process for 
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

7

skid hazard project locations. 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

No

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

A score is provided for each 

project that includes the 

following: Benefit Cost Ratio 

greater than 1, Net Present Value 

greater than 0 and is on the High 

Crash Segment List. 

11. Program: Pedestrian Safety

Date of Program Methodology: 9/1/2012

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only

Population

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Other-Projects are identified using GIS analysis of crash locations and frequency.

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

8

Cost Effectiveness 1

11. Program: Other-Lane Departure

Date of Program Methodology: 9/1/2007

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only

Traffic Other-Mile Point

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

No

If no, describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

The same overall process is used, excluding traffic volume data and crash rates. 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Other-Districts coordinate with staff for projects and submit to Central Office for approval.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

A score is provided for each 

project that includes the 

following: Benefit Cost Ratio and 

Net Present Value greater than 1, 

Net Present Value greater than 0 

and is on the High Crash 

Segments List.

12. What proportion of highway safety improvement program funds address systemic improvements? 

3%

Highway safety improvement program funds are used to address which of the following systemic 
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

9

improvements?

Add/Upgrade/Modify/Remove Traffic Signal

13. What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

Engineering Study

Road Safety Assessment

14. Identify any program methodology practices used to implement the HSIP that have changed since 

the last reporting period.

Other-None

15. Describe any other aspects of the Highway Safety Improvement Program methodology on which 

you would like to elaborate. 

None at this time.

Progress in Implementing Projects

Funds Programmed

16. Reporting period for Highway Safety Improvement Program funding.

State Fiscal Year

17. Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category.

Funding Category Programmed* Obligated

Amount Percentage Amount Percentage

HSIP (Section 148) $110,005,414.00 100 % $110,005,414.00 100 %

HRRRP (SAFETEA-LU) $3,872.00 0 % $3,872.00 0 %

Totals $110,009,286.00 100% $110,009,286.00 100%
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

10

18. How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) safety projects? 

$19,575,328.00

How much funding is obligated to local safety projects?

$19,525,328.00

19. How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$6,533,830.00

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$6,533,830.00

20. How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas during the 

reporting period?

$0.00

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during the reporting 

period?

$6,279,955.00

21. Discuss impediments to obligating Highway Safety Improvement Program funds and plans to 

overcome this in the future.

None to report at this time.

22. Describe any other aspects of the general Highway Safety Improvement Program implementation 

progress on which you would like to elaborate.

Question 20

Funds transferred out of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) were used during the State 

Fiscal Year 2015/2016 to implement the department's Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiative and the 

Safe Routes to School Program. 
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

11

The Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiative was previously funded through the HSIP. Funds were 

transferred from the HSIP to this program as a result of funding restrictions enacted through the Fixing 

America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act (PL 114-94). 
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

12

General Listing of Projects

23. List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period.

Projec

t

Improvement Category Output HSIP 

Cost

Total 

Cost

Fundin

g 

Catego

ry

Functional 

Classificati

on

AADT Spee

d

Roadwa

y 

Ownersh

ip

Relationship to 

SHSP

Emphasis 

Area

Strate

gy

22083

8-2

Intersection geometry 

Intersection geometrics -

miscellaneous/other/unspe

cified

1 

Numbe

rs

402965 402965 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

NonLocation 

Specific

0 0 NonLocation 

Specific

Intersectio

ns

25464

7-1

Pedestrians and bicyclists 

Install sidewalk

1 

Numbe

rs

882294 1068522 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

NonLocation 

Specific

0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Pedestrian

s

25467

7-2

Intersection geometry 

Intersection geometrics -

miscellaneous/other/unspe

cified

1 

Numbe

rs

546062

4

5460624 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

NonLocation 

Specific

0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

41886

0-5

Access management 

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

7.27 

Miles

129473 163308 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

52287 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42307

1-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - extend 

acceleration/deceleration 

lane

1 

Numbe

rs

242165

0

2680997 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

31902 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42564

6-2

Roadway signs and traffic 

control Roadway signs 

(including post) - new or 

1 

Numbe

rs

249525 249525 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

NonLocation 

Specific

0 0 NonLocation 

Specific

Multiple
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

13

updated

42700

4-2

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal - add 

additional signal heads

1 

Numbe

rs

321054 484596 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

48000 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42902

8-1

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal -

modernization/replacemen

t

1 

Numbe

rs

10000 2609340 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

15000 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42906

1-1

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal -

modernization/replacemen

t

1 

Numbe

rs

250000 1418023 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

11300 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42907

7-2

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal -

modernization/replacemen

t

1 

Numbe

rs

170062

4

5555093 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

49000 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42913

4-1

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal - add 

additional signal heads

1 

Numbe

rs

672858 1480040 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

65500 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42934

3-2

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal timing 

- left-turn phasing 

(permissive to protectedonly)

1 

Numbe

rs

167582 167618 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

24500 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42934

5-2

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal - add 

additional signal heads

1 

Numbe

rs

134416 134416 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

18400 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42936

5-1

Lighting Continuous 

roadway lighting

2.45 

Miles

164485

4

1928000 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

25905

3

65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

14

42936

6-1

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal -

modernization/replacemen

t

0.15 

Miles

249468

8

2494688 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Major 

Collector

8700 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Pedestrian

s

42950

4-1

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal -

modernization/replacemen

t

1 

Numbe

rs

498246 513246 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

46500 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42950

6-1

Lighting Continuous 

roadway lighting

1.247 

Miles

919968 960996 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

46500 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

42960

6-2

Lighting Intersection 

lighting

1 

Numbe

rs

45930 46456 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Local Road 

or Street

0 0 Other 

Local 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42967

0-2

Shoulder treatments Widen 

shoulder - paved or other

6.819 

Miles

300100

0

3190282 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Rural 

Minor 

Collector

700 25 Other 

Local 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

42967

0-4

Shoulder treatments Widen 

shoulder - paved or other

2.436 

Miles

149900

0

1499000 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Rural 

Minor 

Collector

600 0 Other 

Local 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

42967

5-2

Roadway delineation 

Improve retroreflectivity

3.02 

Miles

189000 189000 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

14925 45 Other 

Local 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

42973

7-1

Lighting Continuous 

roadway lighting

3.98 

Miles

256613

9

2840635 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

73500 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

42973

8-1

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal timing 

- left-turn phasing 

(permissive to protectedonly)

1 

Numbe

rs

521491 548350 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

16900 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

15

42974

0-1

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal timing 

- left-turn phasing 

(permissive to protectedonly)

1 

Numbe

rs

433799 456012 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

37500 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42974

1-1

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal - add 

additional signal heads

1 

Numbe

rs

397189 420984 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

51000 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42974

2-1

Lighting Intersection 

lighting

0.63 

Miles

12970 12970 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

50500 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42974

5-1

Lighting Intersection 

lighting

0.83 

Miles

281178 286600 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

12700 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

42975

0-2

Roadway Superelevation / 

cross slope

0.192 

Miles

163889

9

1817529 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Minor 

Collector

2000 0 Other 

Local 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

42975

2-7

Pedestrians and bicyclists 

Install sidewalk

1.91 

Miles

8020 25720 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

44484 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Pedestrian

s

43019

6-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - extend 

existing left-turn lane

1 

Numbe

rs

329780 339314 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

46500 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43019

8-1

Lighting Intersection 

lighting

1 

Numbe

rs

63274 63274 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

41000 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43068 Shoulder treatments Widen 12.748 512328 5123281 HSIP Rural 3100 0 Other Lane 
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

16

7-3 shoulder - paved or other Miles 1 (Sectio

n 148)

Major 

Collector

Local 

Agency

Departure

43076

5-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - extend 

existing left-turn lane

1 

Numbe

rs

690203 769634 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

26986 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43076

8-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane

5 

Numbe

rs

214824

1

2179091 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

57000 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43086

1-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - add rightturn lane

1 

Numbe

rs

321594 331697 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

26986 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43090

0-1

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal -

modernization/replacemen

t

1 

Numbe

rs

300000 3568802 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

26986 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43091

1-1

Intersection geometry 

Intersection geometrics -

modify skew angle

1 

Numbe

rs

674817

2

6994186 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

44870 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43093

1-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - add rightturn lane

0.5 

Miles

368091 382904 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

44870 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43113

2-1

Intersection traffic control 

Modify traffic signal -

modernization/replacemen

t

1 

Numbe

rs

395000 1787239 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

44870 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43114

2-1

Shoulder treatments Widen 

shoulder - paved or other

2.239 

Miles

692240 692240 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Rural 

Major 

Collector

2000 55 Other 

Local 

Agency

Lane 

Departure
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

17

43114

3-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - modify 

left-turn lane offset

1 

Numbe

rs

400000 3720010 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

17500 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43182

0-2

Pedestrians and bicyclists 

Miscellaneous pedestrians 

and bicyclists

1 

Numbe

rs

115607 115607 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

NonLocation 

Specific

0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Pedestrian

s

43219

3-1

Roadway Roadway 

widening - travel lanes

0.33 

Miles

110000

00

2901571

63

HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

17500 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

43241

4-1

Roadway Rumble strips -

edge or shoulder

32.18 

Miles

259791 286791 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

4450 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

43242

5-1

Roadway Rumble strips -

edge or shoulder

8.53 

Miles

59729 59729 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

10050 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

43242

5-2

Roadway Rumble strips -

edge or shoulder

6.65 

Miles

45170 45170 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

4400 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

43311

1-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane

0.33 

Miles

160114

7

1656000 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

17500 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43336

9-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane

1 

Numbe

rs

236524 237456 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

35000 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43337

0-1

Intersection geometry 

Intersection geometrics -

1 

Numbe

519654 537921 HSIP 

(Sectio

Urban 

Principal 

17500 55 State 

Highway 

Intersectio

ns
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

18

modify intersection corner 

radius

rs n 148) Arterial -

Other

Agency

43337

2-1

Intersection geometry 

Intersection geometrics -

modify intersection corner 

radius

1 

Numbe

rs

388223 395750 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

30500 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43337

3-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane

1 

Numbe

rs

224308 246000 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

4946 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43337

4-1

Lighting Intersection 

lighting

1 

Numbe

rs

216538 243530 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

4946 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43337

5-1

Lighting Continuous 

roadway lighting

1.52 

Miles

103480

9

1087453 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

13546 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

43337

6-1

Lighting Continuous 

roadway lighting

1.14 

Miles

490347 520364 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

6571 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

43337

7-1

Pedestrians and bicyclists 

Miscellaneous pedestrians 

and bicyclists

1 

Numbe

rs

4625 4625 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

NonLocation 

Specific

0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Pedestrian

s

43337

9-1

Intersection traffic control 

Modify control - two-way 

stop to roundabout

1 

Numbe

rs

124294

8

1242948 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Rural 

Major 

Collector

4200 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43339

6-1

Intersection traffic control 

Modify control - two-way 

stop to roundabout

1 

Numbe

rs

363890

4

3736378 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

6137 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43340

2-1

Access management 

Median crossover -

directional crossover

1 

Numbe

rs

590579 593331 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

19800 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

19

43340

7-1

Access management 

Median crossover -

directional crossover

1 

Numbe

rs

694585 727864 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

38441 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43340

8-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - modify 

free-flow turn lane

1 

Numbe

rs

870180 912355 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

17400 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43340

9-1

Intersection geometry 

Intersection geometrics -

modify skew angle

1 

Numbe

rs

428988 440696 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

19800 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43341

1-1

Pedestrians and bicyclists 

Modify existing crosswalk

1.14 

Miles

250379 250379 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

42500 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Pedestrian

s

43341

2-1

Intersection geometry 

Intersection geometrics -

miscellaneous/other/unspe

cified

1 

Numbe

rs

642925 657925 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

NonLocation 

Specific

0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43341

6-1

Intersection geometry 

Intersection geometrics -

miscellaneous/other/unspe

cified

1 

Numbe

rs

386250 386250 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Local Road 

or Street

0 0 Other 

Local 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43343

6-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - add rightturn lane

1 

Numbe

rs

350000 350000 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

3800 35 Other 

Local 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43351

9-2

Roadway signs and traffic 

control Roadway signs 

(including post) - new or 

updated

365 

Numbe

rs

231753

8

2322538 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

NonLocation 

Specific

0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

43430

8-1

Access management 

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

2 

Numbe

rs

376213 376213 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

21000 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersectio

ns
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

20

43480

9-1

Lighting Continuous 

roadway lighting

1.1 

Miles

357971 367874 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

30331 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

43601

2-1

Access management 

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

1 

Numbe

rs

153715

3

1537153 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

28000 45 Other 

Local 

Agency

Intersectio

ns

43696

5-1

Intersection geometry 

Auxiliary lanes - add rightturn lane

1 

Numbe

rs

450000 450000 HSIP 

(Sectio

n 148)

Urban 

Local Road 

or Street

0 0 Other 

Local 

Agency

Intersectio

ns
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

21

Progress in Achieving Safety Performance Targets

Overview of General Safety Trends

24. Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the state for the past five years. 

Performance Measures* 2010

(5-yr avg)

2011

(5-yr avg)

2012

(5-yr avg)

2013

(5-yr avg)

2014

(5-yr avg)

Number of fatalities 2915.2 2722.2 2564 2447.8 2434

Number of serious injuries 24296.2 22585.2 21145 20437.8 20058.6

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 1.46 1.38 1.32 1.26 1.25

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 12.14 11.42 10.86 10.55 10.31

*Performance measure data is presented using a five-year rolling average.
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

22
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

23
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

24

25. To the maximum extent possible, present performance measure data by functional classification and ownership.

Year - 2014

Function Classification Number of fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of serious injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

RURAL PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE

96.2 473.4 1.02 5.03

RURAL PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - OTHER 

FREEWAYS AND 

EXPRESSWAYS

155.2 779.6 1.75 9.89

RURAL PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - OTHER

32.4 111 0.45 1.53

RURAL MINOR 

ARTERIAL

82.8 402.2 2.69 12.93

RURAL MINOR 

COLLECTOR

0.4 0.42 4.89

RURAL MAJOR 

COLLECTOR

7 45.8 0.93 1.14

URBAN PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE

179.8 1310 0.7 5.09

URBAN PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - OTHER 

FREEWAYS AND 

EXPRESSWAYS

67.2 435.8 0.57 3.72

URBAN PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - OTHER

646.4 5605.2 1.82 15.78

URBAN MINOR 

ARTERIAL

198.8 1721.2 1.57 13.54

URBAN MINOR 

COLLECTOR

0.4 0.09 0.19
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

25

URBAN MAJOR 

COLLECTOR

9 83.8 0.39 3.66
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

26
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

27
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

28
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

29
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

30

Year - 2014

Roadway Ownership Number of fatalities Number of serious injuries Fatality rate (per HMVMT) Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

STATE HIGHWAY AGENCY 1481.8 11415.2 1.33 10.26

LOCAL ROADS 950.4 8479 1.13 10.06
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

31
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

32
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

33
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

34
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

35
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

36

26. Describe any other aspects of the general highway safety trends on which you would like to 

elaborate.

Question 25

Serious injury and fatality counts and rates were excluded from the data in question 25 for two federal 

functional classifications. Data for Urban and Rural Local Roads and Streets was excluded due to the low 

frequency of crashes and low volume which resulted in artificially high rates. The proportion of the 

functionally classified roads in this category in FDOT's data is too small to draw any definitive 

conclusions from the counts or rates. 

Application of Special Rules

27. Present the rate of traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and pedestrians 65 

years of age and older.

Older Driver

Performance Measures

2010

(5-yr avg)

2011

(5-yr avg)

2012

(5-yr avg)

2013

(5-yr avg)

2014

(5-yr avg)

Fatality rate (per capita) 0.11 0.1 0.1

Serious injury rate (per 

capita)

0.54 0.52 0.51

Fatality and serious injury 

rate (per capita)

0.64 0.63 0.61

*Performance measure data is presented using a five-year rolling average.

Year Count of Seriously Injured Drivers 

and Pedestrians (SI)

Count of Fatally Injured Drivers 

and Pedestrians (F)

Combined F 

and SI

Population 

Figure

2008 2,111 336 2,111 3,183

2009 2,167 340 2,167 3,199

2010 2,096 371 2,096 3,273

2011 2,086 340 2,086 3,359

2012 2,145 343 2,145 3,509

2013 2,115 351 2,115 3,644

2014 2,264 365 2,264 3,791

Calculation / Methods of deriving the values entered for Fatality and Serious Injury Rate (per capita)

Yearly Crash Rate = Combined F and SI for given year / Population Figure
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

37

5 Year Average Crash Rate = 5 Yearly Crash Rates / 5

Example, 2013 5-Year Average Crash Rate:

2010: 2096 / 3273 = 0.64

2011: 2086 / 3359 = 0.62

2012: 2145 / 3509 = 0.61

2013: 2115 / 3644 = 0.58

2014: 2264 / 3791 = 0.60

(0.64 + 0.62 + 0.61 + 0.58 + 0.60) = 3.05 / 5 = 0.61

Data Sources:

Fatals - FARS (Persons age 65 - 120, person type 1 (Driver) + 5 (Pedestrian), Injury = 4 (Fatal), State = 12 

(Florida))

Serious Injuries - Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles - Five Year Crash Trends 
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

38

28. Does the older driver special rule apply to your state? 

No

Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Improvements (Program 

Evaluation)
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

39

29. What indicators of success can you use to demonstrate effectiveness and success in the Highway 

Safety Improvement Program?

Other-Reduction in Fatalities and Serious Injuries

30. What significant programmatic changes have occurred since the last reporting period? 

None

31. Briefly describe significant program changes that have occurred since the last reporting period. 

None.
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

40

SHSP Emphasis Areas

32. Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures.

Year - 2014

HSIP-related SHSP 

Emphasis Areas

Target Crash 

Type

Number of 

fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

serious injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality rate 

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious injury rate 

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Other1

(5-yr 

avg)

Other2

(5-yr 

avg)

Other3

(5-yr 

avg)

Lane Departure Run-off-road 1068 7042 0.55 3.63

Intersections Intersections 683.6 7881.4 0.35 4.06

Pedestrians and 

Bicyclists

All 631 2459.8 0.32 1.27
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

41
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

42
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

43
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

44

Groups of similar project types
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

45

33. Present the overall effectiveness of HSIP subprograms.

Systemic Treatments

34. Present the overall effectiveness of systemic treatments.

Year - 2014

HSIP Subprogram TypesTarget 

Crash Type

Number of 

fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

serious injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious injury rate 

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Other-1

(5-yr 

avg)

Other-2

(5-yr 

avg)

Other-3

(5-yr 

avg)

Pedestrian Safety 514.6 1610.2 0.26 0.83

Intersection 683.6 7881.4 0.35 4.06

Bicycle Safety 116.4 846 0.06 0.43

Year - 2014

Systemic improvement Target 

Crash 

Type

Number of 

fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

serious 

injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality rate 

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious injury 

rate (per 

HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Other1

(5-yr 

avg)

Other2

(5-yr 

avg)

Other3

(5-yr 

avg)

Add/Upgrade/Modify/Remove 

Traffic Signal

683.6 7881.4 0.35 4.06
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

46

35. Describe any other aspects of the overall Highway Safety Improvement Program effectiveness on 

which you would like to elaborate. 

Question 32

Crash data reported for Lane Departure crashes should be viewed in light of the fact that the Florida 

Traffic Crash Report - Long Form changed significantly in 2011. Due to the changes in the crash report 

form, the definition of a Lane Departure crash was significantly changes. As a result, the frequency of 

crashes is very different when comparing 2010 and earlier crash data to 2011 and later crash data.

Question 36

Crash counts for both totals and crash severity were excluded from the data submitted as part of the 

option project evaluation. The evaluation results were calculated using the FDOT's Crash Analysis and 

System Hub (CRASH), which performs a naïve before / after analysis on state roadways. The output from 

the CRASH system provided before / after crash data with both target crash types (head-on, left turn, 

rear end, etc) and total crashes by injury severity (fatal, serious injury, etc). Unfortunately, it does not 

provide target crash types by crash severity level, which is the evaluation method FDOT used for the 

project evaluation. 

FDOT performed a project evaluation using a naïve before / after method using the following 

parameters:

-3 calendar years of pre and post construction crash data, excluding 1 year before and after the 

construction period

-The project benefits were calculated using FDOT's average cost per crash on state roadways of 

$155,695

-The project costs were provided by FDOT district staff through the CRASH system

-The change in crashes was measured as the change in total crashes in all improvement categories 

except:

 Rumble Strips, Pedestrian Improvements, Access Management, Lighting, High Friction Surface 

Treatment and Auxiliary Lanes
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

47

Project Evaluation

36. Provide project evaluation data for completed projects (optional). 

Location Functional 

Class

Improvement 

Category

Improvement Type BefFatalBefSerious 

Injury

Bef-All 

Injuries

BefPDOBefTotalAftFatalAftSerious 

Injury

Aft-All 

Injuries

AftPDOAftTotalEvaluation 

Results 

(Benefit/ 

Cost Ratio)

53130000 

from 

8.400 to 

0.3

Rural 

Major 

Collector

Intersection 

geometry

Splitter island - install on 

one or more approaches

-1

18030000 

from 

10.600 to 

0.267

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal -

modernization/replacement

0.8
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

48

05020000 

from 

20.642 to 

8.818

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

6.7

10075333 

from 

0.000 to 

0.145

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial 

Interstate

Roadway Pavement surface - high 

friction surface

16.8

54020000 

from 

3.144 to 

0.373

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add 

acceleration lane

-1.8

08080000 

from 

4.441 to 

6.238

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

8.6
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

49

08070000 

from 

0.000 to 

7.022

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

37.9

02030000 

from 

15.570 to 

7.795

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - modify 

signal mounting (spanwire 

to mast arm)

-10.3

02030000 

from 

19.211 to 

0.319

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane-3.7

06010000 

from 

0.000 to 

3

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

16.5
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

50

13050000 

from 

22.134 to 

8.651

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Pavement surface -

miscellaneous

-0.4

03010000 

from 

24.687 to 

3.727

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

10.7

05010000 

from 

10.724 to 

5.276

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

-5.1

09060000 

from 

0.000 to 

22.925

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

9.7
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

51

36080000 

from 

6.272 to 

25.934

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

4.9

17030000 

from 

3.870 to 

2.083

Urban 

Collector

Roadway Pavement surface -

miscellaneous

-0.1

17030000 

from 

5.953 to 

3

Urban 

Collector

Roadway Pavement surface -

miscellaneous

-0.1

29010000 

from 

3.767 to 

0.02

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane3.1
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

52

87008000 

from 

7.005 to 

0.345

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

Interchange 

design

Interchange design - other 8.6

87026000 

from 

7.751 to 

0.1

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

Access 

management

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

-7.8

75250000 

from 

0.939 to 

0.189

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane-1.4

93012000 

from 

2.761 to 

0.306

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometrics -

modify intersection corner 

radius

18.2
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

53

16100000 

from 

0.000 to 

0.414

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Pavement surface - high 

friction surface

-1

3010000 

from 

9.281 to 

0.189

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - add 

additional signal heads

-20.1

94120000 

from 

5.922 to 

0.1

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal timing -

left-turn phasing (permissive 

to protected/permissive)

-1.8

03080000 

from 

37.309 to 

0.502

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Pedestrians 

and bicyclists

Pedestrian signal - install 

new at non-intersection 

location

27
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

54

11200000 

from 

4.000 to 

29.71

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

3.4

03010000 

from 

3.539 to 

0.5

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Pedestrians 

and bicyclists

Install sidewalk -1

87001000 

from 

7.787 to 

0.076

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Splitter island - install on 

one or more approaches

3.1

15010000 

from 

8.853 to 

0.289

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Pedestrians 

and bicyclists

Install sidewalk -21.7
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

55

02030000 

from 

14.003 to 

0.4

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Pedestrians 

and bicyclists

Install new crosswalk -1

10150000 

from 

5.791 to 

0.328

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane45.4

10290000 

from 

7.029 to 

0.1

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Access 

management

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

3.8

08040000 

from 

0.000 to 

4.07

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

24.1
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

56

02030000 

from 

3.382 to 

3.429

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

1.3

14050000 

from 

0.037 to 

3.709

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

17.3

10060000 

from 

0.000 to 

7.58

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

33

10120000 

from 

0.683 to 

5.603

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

36.2
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

57

10110000 

from 

7.074 to 

0.159

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Pedestrians 

and bicyclists

Install sidewalk 7.7

10150000 

from 

11.620 to 

0.705

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Pavement surface - high 

friction surface

-4

10130000 

from 

7.590 to 

0.152

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane11

15220000 

from 

0.197 to 

1.028

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Lighting Continuous roadway lighting -6.2
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

58

87120000 

from 

5.793 to 

0.515

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane-8.7

02030000 

from 

14.396 to 

0.462

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Pavement surface -

miscellaneous

-6.3

15090000 

from 

7.340 to 

2.652

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Roadway Pavement surface -

miscellaneous

-3.6

10160000 

from 

0.280 to 

1.529

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Access 

management

Raised island - install new 49.9
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

59

10130000 

from 

9.596 to 

0.184

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Access 

management

Raised island - install new 53

26090000 

from 

12.700 to 

0.949

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Access 

management

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

14.2

87001000 

from 

7.825 to 

0.17

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Splitter island - install on 

one or more approaches

0.5

86110000 

from 

3.014 to 

0.142

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

advance intersection 

warning sign-mounted

-1
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

60

86100000 

from 

19.711 to 

0.705

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - add 

additional signal heads

6.8

87020000 

from 

12.333 to 

0.1

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - extend 

existing left-turn lane

-98.7

87001000 

from 

9.088 to 

0.1

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Access 

management

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

1.5

12011000 

from 

8.310 to 

0.102

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - extend 

existing left-turn lane

45.5
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

61

12070000 

from 

20.854 to 

0.357

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane0.3

13020000 

from 

5.704 to 

0.166

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Access 

management

Median crossover -

directional crossover

2.9

71110000 

from 

25.928 to 

0.4

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane1.9

87030000 

from 

23.329 to 

0.342

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane233.2
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

62

90060000 

from 

25.780 to 

0.395

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Access 

management

Median crossover -

directional crossover

-6.7

87019000 

from 

1.660 to 

0.056

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add rightturn lane-9.4

87047000 

from 

9.222 to 

0.1

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add leftturn lane2.8

70002000 

from 

0.088 to 

0.129

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal -

modernization/replacement

0.7
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

63

16010000 

from 

0.000 to 

0.189

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Lighting Continuous roadway lighting -30.2

36110000 

from 

25.491 to 

0.24

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Access 

management

Median crossover -

directional crossover

-42.4

93150000 

from 

0.920 to 

0.1

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Lighting Intersection lighting -16.1

46160000 

from 

9.598 to 

0.175

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal -

modernization/replacement

-14.8
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

64

79010000 

from 

30.564 to 

2.132

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

Access 

management

Raised island - install new -5.4

10190051 

from 

0.000 to 

0.183

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial 

Interstate

Roadway Pavement surface - high 

friction surface

53.2

87270000 

from 

14.525 to 

0.1

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial 

Interstate

Shoulder 

treatments

Pave existing shoulders -6.5
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

65

Optional Attachments

Sections Files Attached
2016 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

66

Glossary

5 year rolling average means the average of five individual, consecutive annual points of data (e.g. 

annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process. 

Highway safety improvement project means strategies, activities and projects on a public road that are 

consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous road location 

or feature or addresses a highway safety problem. 

HMVMT means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which data 

are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance dated 

February 13, 2013. 

Performance measure means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to monitor 

changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and objectives.

Programmed funds mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification means the process by which streets and highways are grouped into 

classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on safety 

data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148. 

Systematic refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across a 

system.

Systemic safety improvement means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high risk 

roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types. 

Transfer means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.