alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charlie J. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-944.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 13, 1969.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Maurice Jay Kutner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Charlie J. Robinson, was convicted of the offense of entering without breaking a store building with intent to commit a misdemeanor, to-wit: petit lar-eny. He was sentenced to one year in the Division of Corrections of the State of Florida.

It is appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in finding him guilty because the evidence did not establish his identity beyond a reasonable doubt.

We must reject appellant’s contention. This court does not sit as a second trier of facts. Williams v. Smelt, Fla.1955, 83 So.2d 1. The issue of identity was one of fact to be determined by the trial judge, before whom the case was tried without a jury. It is our function to determine whether the record contains sufficient competent substantial evidence which, if believed, would support the verdict. We *440have concluded that the trial court’s finding as to the defendant’s identity and guilt are supported by sufficient, competent and substantial evidence. Gibson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 128.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### CENTRAL GULF STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Appellant, v. Sara B. FENLEY, Appellee.

No. 70-514.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 10, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
Order filed January 2 6 , 2022

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00430

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF L.A.V. AND S.H.V., CHILDREN

On Appeal fro m the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- 0 3748J



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed Octo ber 25, 2021 . Our review has determined
that relevant item s ha ve been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the following order s , which are noted on th e clerk ’ s docket sheet :

• Order s igned October 1, 2020 Setting Hearing

• Orde r signed Octo ber 1, 2020 Retaining Case on Docket

• Order sig ned January 11, 2021 Grant ing ContinuanceThe Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s

record on or before February 2 , 2 022 , containing th e above listed items

. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a ce rtified statement that the omitted item is not a part o f the case file.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Just ices Z i mmerer and Wi lson.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 340 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to modify the definition of 

franchise fee, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, 

Mr. CARDIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. KING, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, 

Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHATZ, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. SMITH, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WELCH, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to modify the 

definition of franchise fee, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Community 

5 Television Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFYING THE DEFINITION OF FRANCHISE FEE. 

7 Section 622(g)(1) of the Communications Act of 

8 1934 (47 U.S.C. 542(g)(1)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 340 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘includes’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘means’’; and 

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘other monetary’’ before ‘‘as4 sessment’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
PENNSYLVANIA - AGENCY CONTACTS

PA State 

PDC 

PennDOT Nick Raio Transportation 

Planner

Nraio@pa.gov 717-787-6046

PA LPA

PDC

Tri- County Regional 

Planning Commission

Steven P. 

Deck, AICP

Executive Director sdeck@tcrpc-pa.org 717-234-2639 

x 23

PA FHWA

PDC

FHWA EFL Jacinda Russell Access Program Manager Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov 571-434-1543

PA FHWA FHWA EFL Lewis Grimm Planning Team Leader Lewis.grimm@dot.gov 706-404-6289

PA State PennDOT Gene Heyman Transportation Planner euheyman@pa.gov 717-346-8133

PA FHWA FHWA DO Matt Smoker Director of Innovative Finance & 

Planning

Matt.Smoker@dot.gov 717-221-3703

PA FLMA NPS John Tauscher Northeast FLTP Coordinator John_Tauscher@nps.gov 617-223-5042

PA FLMA NPS Amanda Jones Regional Alternative 

Transportation Manager

Amanda_Jones@nps.gov 215-873-1033

PA FLMA FWS Carl Melberg Regional Coordinator,

Refuge Roads Program

Carl_Melberg@fws.gov 413-253-8586

PA FLMA FWS Nathan

Beauchamp

Fish & Wildlife Service 

Transportation Program 

Nathan_Beauchamp@fws.gov 703-358-2226

PA FLMA FWS Conrad Lamar Fish & Wildlife Service –

Facility Operations 

Conrad_Lamar@fws.gov 678-350-1510

PA FLMA USFS Kevin Contardi Forest Service –National 

FHWA Liaison 

kcontardi@fs.fed.us 414-297-1170

PA FLMA USFS James Forseth Forest Service - Region 9 

Transportation Engineer

james.forseth@usda.gov 414-297-3690

PA FLMA DOD (nonUSACE)Douglas Briggs Senior Engineer/HND-SDDCTEA Douglas.e.briggs.civ@mail.mil 618-220-5229

PA FLMA DOD (USACE) Jeff Defosse/

Mike

Vissichelli

Natural Resources Program

Manager/ Regulatory Appeals

Review Officer

Jeff.A.Defosse@usace.army.mil 

Michael.G.Vissichelli@usace.army.mil 

513-684-3192/

347-370-4663
#### Leon G. SHACK v. J. B. CARMICHAEL, Clerk Circuit Court.

No. 37742.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3526 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3526

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require a lactation space in 
       each medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2023

  Ms. Rosen (for herself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to require a lactation space in 
       each medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lactation Spaces for Veteran Moms 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LACTATION SPACES IN MEDICAL CENTERS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 17 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 1720K. Lactation spaces in medical centers of the Department
    ``(a) Lactation Space Required.--The Secretary shall ensure that 
each medical center of the Department contains a lactation space.
    ``(b) No Unauthorized Entry.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to authorize an individual to enter a medical center of the 
Department or portion thereof that the individual is not otherwise 
authorized to enter.
    ``(c) Lactation Space Defined.--In this section, the term 
`lactation space' means a hygienic place, other than a bathroom, that--
            ``(1) is shielded from view;
            ``(2) is free from intrusion;
            ``(3) is accessible to disabled individuals (including such 
        individuals who use wheelchairs);
            ``(4) contains a chair and a working surface;
            ``(5) is easy to locate;
            ``(6) is clearly identified with signage; and
            ``(7) is available for use by women veterans and members of 
        the public to express breast milk.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item related to section 
1720J the following new item:

``1720K. Lactation spaces in medical centers of the Department.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall carry 
out section 1720K of title 38, United States Code, as added by this 
section, not later than two years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

PAULA SMALL,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

IMPLANT DIRECT MFG. LLC, DBA IMPLANT 

DIRECT, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant

______________________ 

2015-1163

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of New York in No. 1:06-cv-00683-NRB, 

Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

GERARD HADDAD, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, New York, 

NY, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by 

JENNIFER BIANROSA. 

MARVIN H. KLEINBERG, Kleinberg & Lerner, LLP, Los 

Angeles, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER JOHN DUGGER, MICHAEL HUREY. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 July 14, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILLIAM SCOTT COOPER, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 06-80 Erie

v. )

)

JAMES VESHECCO, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on April 3, 2006,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 11], filed on

August 24, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed for failure to

exhaust and that a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten

(10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by

certified mail and on Respondents. No objections were filed. After de novo review of

the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation,

the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust and a certificate of appealability is

DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 11] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on August 24, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00080-SJM-SPB Document 12 Filed 09/13/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                              24

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1






                                MID OCEAN LIMITED
                                       AND
                                  SUBSIDIARIES



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  % Beneficial             Jurisdiction
                                                                  Ownership by                       of
                                                              Immediate Parent            Incorporation
                                                              ----------------            -------------
<S>                                                                        <C>           <C>
Mid Ocean Limited                                                           --           Cayman Islands

    Mid Ocean Reinsurance Company Ltd                                      100                  Bermuda
       Baltusrol Holdings Limited                                           51                  Bermuda
          Dornoch Limited                                                  100           United Kingdom
          County Down Limited                                              100           United Kingdom

       Brockbank Holdings Limited                                           51           United Kingdom
           Brockbank Underwriting Limited                                  100           United Kingdom
              Brockbank Syndicate  Management Limited                      100           United Kingdom
                  Admiral Insurance Services Limited                       80            United Kingdom
                    Admiral Services (Europe) Limited                      100           United Kingdom
                    Able Insurance Services Limited                        100           United Kingdom
              Brockbank Personal Lines Limited                             100           United Kingdom
                 Zenith Policy Services Limited                            100           United Kingdom
              Cassidy Brockbank Limited                                    100           United Kingdom
              Brockbank Dedicated Insurance Limited                        100           United Kingdom
              Brockbank Financial Services Limited                         100           United Kingdom


       Mid Ocean Reinsurance Consulting GmbH                               100                  Germany
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                               [NSAI LETTERHEAD]




           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
           ---------------------------------------------------------


     We hereby consent to the references to Netherland, Sewell & Associates,
Inc. and to the use of its reports regarding the Burlington Resources Coal Seam
Gas Royalty Trust proved reserves and estimated Section 29 tax credits in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, to be filed by
the Burlington Resources Coal Seam Royalty Trust with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.



                                   NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.



                                   By:  /s/ DANNY D. SIMMONS
                                       ---------------------------------
                                        Danny D. Simmons
                                        Senior Vice President

Houston, Texas
March 30, 1998
# L_2005005EN.01002301.xml

| 7.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 5/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 5/23

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 20/2005

of 6 January 2005

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 16th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 16th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 44,160 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 January 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

2

---
#### James H. MEEKS v. HOLIDAY INN OF NATCHEZ, INC.

No. 50419.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 1, 1978.

Loyacono & Field, Paul Kelly Loyacono, Vicksburg, for appellant.

Brandon, Handy & Blough, G. Stuart Handy, Natchez, for. appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
109 STAT. 800 PUBLIC LAW 104–86—DEC. 28, 1995

Public Law 104–86

104th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States Courthouse for the Eastern District of Virginia

in Alexandria, Virginia, as the Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ALBERT V. BRYAN UNITED STATES

COURTHOUSE.

(a) NEW COURTHOUSE.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Federal building located at Courthouse Square South and Jamieson Avenue in Alexandria, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Albert V. Bryan

United States Courthouse’’.

(2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the

Federal building referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed

to be a reference to the ‘‘Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse’’.

(b) OLD COURTHOUSE.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Federal building located at 200 South

Washington Street in Alexandria, Virginia, shall not be known

and designated as the ‘‘Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse’’.

(2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the

Federal building known and designated prior to the effective

date of this section as the ‘‘Albert V. Bryan United States

Courthouse’’ shall be deemed to be a reference to the Federal

building referred to in paragraph (1).

Dec. 28, 1995

[S. 965]

PUBLIC LAW 104–86—DEC. 28, 1995 109 STAT. 801

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 965:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–420 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

Aug. 9, considered and passed Senate.

Dec. 18, considered and passed House.

Æ

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall become effective on

the date of the completion of the construction of the Federal building

referred to in subsection (a)(1).

Approved December 28, 1995.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1421** 

In R e: JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. ( 7:92

- cr - 00135

- JCT

- RSB

- 1 )

S ubmitted : July 17, 2013 Decided: August 23, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
. Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jimmy Lawrence Nance petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to address claims he contends were raised but not resolved in his 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2255 (West Supp. 2013) proceedings. We conclude that Nance is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, manda mus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan
Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). The relief sought by Nance is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant Nance leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. Nance’s motion s for appointment of counsel and to amend the mandamus petition are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade quately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED