alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27878]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. IA 97-070, ASLBP No. 98-734-01-EA]


Magdy Elamir, M.D.; Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing 
Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 F.R. 28710 (1972), and Sections 
2.105, 2.700, 2.702, 2.714, 2.714a, 2.717, 2.721, and 2.772(j) of the 
Commission's Regulations, all as amended, an Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board is being established to preside over the following 
proceeding.

MAGDY ELAMIR, M.D.

Order Superseding Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed 
Activities (Effective Immediately)

IA 97-070

    In accordance with 10 C.F.R. Sec. 202, this Board is established as 
a result of the petitioner, Dr. Magdy Elamir, President of Newark 
Medical Associates, P.A., requesting a hearing on a September 15, 1997, 
NRC Order. The Order prohibits Dr. Elamir from engaging in NRC-licensed 
activities for five years, requires him to inform the NRC of any NRC 
licensed entity or entities where Dr. Elamir is involved and prohibits 
such involvements, and requires him to provide a copy of the Order to 
all such NRC-licensed entities.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555
Dr. Peter S. Lam, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555
Dr. Jerry R. Kline, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555

    All correspondence, documents and other materials in this 
proceeding shall be filed with the Judges in accordance with 10 C.F.R. 
Sec. 2.701.


    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of October 1997.
B. Paul Cotter, Jr.,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 97-27878 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

**FORM N-PX**

**ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF**

**DWS International Fund, DWS International Value Opportunities Fund, DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund, DWS Europe Equity Fund and DWS Latin America Equity Fund**

**Each a Series of DWS International Fund, Inc.**

Investment Company Act file number  811-642

DWS International Fund, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

John Millette

Secretary

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA  02108-3106

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  617-295-1000

Date of fiscal year end:  08/31

DWS International Fund

DWS International Value Opportunities Fund

Date of fiscal year end:  10/31

DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund

DWS Europe Equity Fund 

DWS Latin America Fund

Date of reporting period:  7/1/07-6/30/08

Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget 

 

----
Exhibit 23.4

Consent of Independent Appraiser

American Appraisal Associates, Inc. ("AAA") hereby consents to QRS Corporation's references to the words appraisal and/or appraiser under the Captions "Documents
Incorporated by Reference," "Note 5: Acquisitions," "Note 7: Impairment Loss," and "Item 7: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"
in its Form 10-K filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2001. Specifically, AAA consents to QRS Corporation's reference
to the shares of common stock of Tradeweave, Inc. valued at $1.17 per share at September 30, 2000. AAA also consents to QRS Corporation's references to purchase price allocations for
Tradeweave, Inc., RockPort Trade Systems, Inc., Image Info, Inc., Retail Data Services, Inc. and RDS, Inc. Additionally, AAA consents to references to analysis performed in conjunction with an
impairment analysis performed in the fourth quarter of 2001. We do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.

/s/
American Appraisal Associates, Inc.

March
20, 2002

---

QuickLinks
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alexis Korybut, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Alexis Korybut





Alexis Korybut


Chief Financial Officer


November 22, 2010
#### Ex parte Clete KING.

SC 2630.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 8, 1977.

EMBRY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, JONES and ALMON, JJ., concur.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-519 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SPACE COOPERATION 

 Arrangement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SWEDEN 

Signed at Washington and Solma 

May 10 and 19, 2011 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
SWEDEN 

Space Cooperation 

 Arrangement signed at Washington and Solma 

 May 10 and 19, 2011; 

 Entered into force May 19, 2011. 





NOTE: The e-mail address for the NASA ARC contact is: John.Hines@nasa.gov.
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 1999 - Present IL Traffic Crash Report Instruction Manual 

2013

A – Incapacitating Injury A

Any injury, other than a fatal injury, which prevents the injured person from walking, driving, 

or normally continuing the activities he/she was capable of performing before the injury 

occurred.

This includes severe lacerations, broken/distorted limbs, skull injuries, chest injuries, 

abdominal injuries

Injury Classification (INJ) codes & definitions found on pg11.

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE STATE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 2009 - Present

IL Crash Report Instruction Manual 2013,

IL Crash Traffic Crash Report 2013,

IL Crash Report Instruction Manual 2009

PED (Pedestrian) Check Box* No definition found.

Step by Step Instructions, # 21 in 2013 

Manual

 (#20 in 2009 Manual)

code found on 2009 Manual pg11 

code found on 2013 Manual pg10

Pedalcyclist 2009 - Present

PEDAL (Pedalcyclist) Check Box*

Person operating bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, pedal car, etc. If a person is not actually operating 

the cycle at the time of the crash (i.e., walking/standing next to it), the PED box should be 

checked. 

Step by Step Instructions, # 21 in 2013 

Manual

 (#20 in 2009 Manual)

code & definition found on 2009 

Manual pg11 

code & definition found on 2013 

Manual pg10

* Police Accident Report includes a check box for Pedestrian/Pedalcyclist - please refer to the State's Data Dictionary for corresponding database value

Illinois
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JAMES JAMAL JACKSON, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-91 Erie

v. )

)

WARDEN BROOKS, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on March 22,

2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 8], filed on

March 17, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed as untimely and

that a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days

from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified

mail and on Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition

and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the

following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus [Doc. No. 2] is DISMISSED as untimely and a certificate of appealability is

DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 8] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on March 17, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00091-SJM-SPB Document 9 Filed 04/05/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.2

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Mark Scott, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. As the registrant's certifying officer I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2007                      /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        Chief Operating and Financial Officer
#### Thomas Bullitt DIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Western Electric Company, and Electrical Research Products, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1937.

James J. Kennedy, Jr., of New York City (James J. Kennedy, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Merrell E. Clark, Henry R. Ashton, and John McGlone, all of New York City, for appellees.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree (12 F.Supp. 996), affirmed.
# L_2005027EN.01003701.xml

| 29.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 27/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 27/37

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 156/2005

of 28 January 2005

concerning tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender for the export to certain third countries of wholly milled and medium and long grain A rice issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 14(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 14(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders submitted from 24 to 27 January 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the export refund on wholly milled rand, medium and long grain A rice to certain third European countries issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 353, 27.11.2004, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 61, 7.3.1975, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 18).

3

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          26,952
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                       513
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,808
<PP&E>                                         122,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,203
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           89,942
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,267
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,511
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,867
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,842
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (338)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,649)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,649)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (24,649)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (83,497)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.64)


</TABLE>
Ja~jtr0 STq r

~

S 

S

~ A'Z UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o ~~~/J a WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

~F ~O 

~lqG PROj~~'~ 

OCT 1 22 

William B. Mackie 

Acting Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office OFFICE OF 

Department of Energy AIR AND RADIATION 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Mackie: 

We received your letter dated September 30, 2010, requesting the U. S. Environmental 

Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft expansion memo CBFO plans to issue to 

extend the calibration range of the Nondestructive Assay Box Counter (NABC) and add three 

remote-handled (RH) waste streams generated by the Battelle Columbus Laboratory (BCL) 

characterized by the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Savannah River Site (SRS). 

This request is in accordance with the CBFO procedures that are intended to ensure that the U. S. 

Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site certifications correlate 

appropriately with EPA approvals for waste characterization activities at DOE transuranic (TRU) 

waste generator sites. On September 14, 2010, EPA approved the extension of the calibration 

range of the NABC (See EPA Air pocket No A-98-49, II-A4-133) and on September 9, 2010, 

EPA approved the SRS-CCP implemented RH waste characterization process for six BCL 

generated waste streams (See EPA Air pocket No A-98-49, II-A4-129). On September 16 2010, 

EPA concurred with a draft site expansion certification memo to add the other three approved 

waste streams. 

EPA has also received and reviewed quarterly tiering reports covering the waste 

characterization program implemented by CCP at SRS and have found all changes made to be 

acceptable. 

EPA concurs that the waste characterization equipment, procedures and waste streams 

encompassed in DOE's draft expansion memo comport with all of EPA's existing approvals for 

RH waste at SRS-CCP. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft expansion memo for 

SRS CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Ed Feltcorn (202-343-9422) or 

Rajani Joglekar (202-343-9462). 

Sincerely, 

~e ~,t y _— 

Edward Feltcorn 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable o Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Ava Holland, CBFO QA 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO 

Court Fesmire, CBFO 

J. R. Stroble, CBFO 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO 

Allison Pangle, CTAC 

Porf Martinez, CTAC
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Nelson BEATTY.

No. 62191.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 1978.

In re: Nelson Beatty, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition and stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied. The relator has not sought to enforce the order by application to the Magistrate.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF METROCALL, INC.

Metrocall USA, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)

Metrocall of Virginia, Inc. (a Virginia corporation)

Metrocall of Shreveport, Inc. (a Louisiana corporation)

Florida Network USA, Inc. (a Florida corporation)

  Page East, Inc. (a North Carolina corporation)

A+ Network Acquisitions, Inc. (a Tennessee corporation)

A+ Beepers, Inc. (a Tennessee corporation)

A+ Network of Jacksonville, Inc. (a Florida corporation)

AAA Answering Services, Inc. (a Tennessee corporation)

AAA Answering Service of Jackson, Inc. (a Tennessee corporation)

AAA Answering Service of Birmingham, Inc. (an Alabama corporation)

Exchange Answering Service of Louisville, Inc. (a Tennessee corporation)

Exchange Answering Service of Memphis, Inc. (a Tennessee corporation)