alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28071]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Cooperative Agreement for Mayors' Institute on City Design

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts.

ACTION: Notification of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts is requesting proposals 
leading to the award of a Cooperative Agreement to manage, through a 
full time director, a partnership of national organizations, government 
agencies, and universities to support the continuing activities of the 
``Mayors' Institute on City Design.'' Eligibility to apply is limited 
to 501(c)(3) organizations with a national constituency, a significant 
physical presence in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, and a 
mission that includes education and advocacy regarding policies and 
practices affecting the design of American cities. The Mayor's 
Institute is a series of forums dedicated to the improvement of the 
design of American cities. The Institute's activities include two semi-
annual conferences (institutes), alumni programs, coordination of the 
activities of four annual regional institutes, and maintenance of 
records and archives. The initial period of the Cooperative Agreement 
will be one year with potential renewal. Funding is limited to $400,000 
for the first year. Those interested in receiving the Solicitation 
package should reference Program Solicitation PS 98-01 in their written 
request. Requests must be accompanied by two (2) self-addressed labels. 
verbal requests for the Solicitations will not be honored.

DATES: Program Solicitations PS 98-01 is scheduled for release 
approximately November 7, 1997 with proposals due December 8, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Requests for the Solicitation should be addressed to 
National Endowment for the Arts, Grants & Contracts Office, Room 618, 
1100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William I. Hummel, Grants & Contracts Office, National Endowment for 
the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20506 (202/682-
5482).
William I. Hummel,
Coordinator, Cooperative Agreements and Contracts.
[FR Doc. 97-28071 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
```
#### G. E. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. Aaron H. COURSHON, d/b/a Thunderbird Motel, Appellee.

No. 70-277.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 15, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0518

THERESA CARBAH,

Petitioner and Appellee,

and

CHRISTOPHER CARBAH,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER 

Appeal from Cause No. DR 18-100 in the Sixth Judicial District Court of Montana, 

Park County, Judge Brenda Gilbert

Karl Knuchel

Knuchel & Oden, P.C.

101 North E Street, P.O. Box 953

Livingston, MT 59047

(406) 222-0135

karl@knuchelpc.com

Counsel for Respondent and 

Appellant

Kirsten Mull Core

Kirsten Mull Core P.C.

1700 W Koch St. #9

Bozeman Mt, 59715

(406) 556-8485

Kirsten@mullcorepc.com

Counsel for Petitioner and 

Appellee

05/21/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0518
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Counsel for Appellant has filed an unopposed motion for an extension of time 

until June 23, 2021, upon which to file his reply brief.

The Court notes that the reply brief was due May 7, 2021. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 30-day motion for extension is DENIED. 

Counsel shall have until June 7, 2021, within which to file the reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted. 

cc: Karl Knuchel/Webster Crist

Kirsten Mull Core

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 21 2021
Flight Batteries Log

Date Time Location PIC VO Flight DurationWeatherTakoff/Landing Incident Observations Cur Cycle Life Cycle
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
conjunction with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Fuel
Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”),





I, Stuart
D. Beath, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  May
      15, 2008
            By:
            
            /s/Stuart D.
      BeathStuart
      D.
      BeathChief
      Financial Officer
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3553 

AN ACT 

To provide a retroactive effective date for the promotions 

of senior officers of the Armed Forces whose military 

promotions were delayed as a result of the suspension 

of Senate confirmation of such promotions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3553 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Personnel 

3 Confirmation Restoration Act of 2023’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

5 Congress holds the men and women who defend the 

6 United States in the highest esteem. 

7 SEC. 3. RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE OF PROMOTIONS 

8 OF SENIOR OFFICERS OF ARMED FORCES 

9 THAT WERE DELAYED AS A RESULT OF SUS10 PENSION OF SENATE CONFIRMATION. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual con12 firmed, during the period beginning on December 5, 2023, 

13 and ending on December 31, 2023, to a grade or rank 

14 in the Armed Forces associated with pay grade O–7 or 

15 higher and whose confirmation was delayed as a result of 

16 the suspension of the provision of advice and consent by 

17 the Senate to appointments to such grades and ranks that 

18 began in February 2023— 

19 (1) the Secretary of Defense shall provide the 

20 individual, retroactive to the date described in sub21 section (b)— 

22 (A) pay and allowances at the rates or in 

23 the amounts payable for the pay grade associ24 ated with the appointment of the individual; 

25 and 
3 

†S 3553 ES

1 (B) the benefits to which an individual in 

2 the grade or rank associated with the appoint3 ment is entitled; and 

4 (2) the date described in subsection (b) shall be 

5 the date used for determining the seniority of the in6 dividual in the grade or rank associated with the ap7 pointment. 

8 (b) DATE DESCRIBED.—The date described in this 

9 subsection is, with respect to an individual described in 

10 subsection (a), the date that is the later of— 

11 (1) the date that is 30 days after the date on 

12 which the nomination of the individual was placed 

13 on the Executive Calendar of the Senate; or 

14 (2) the date on which the individual would have 

15 been appointed but for the suspension of the provi16 sion of advice and consent described in subsection 

17 (a), as determined by the Secretary concerned (as 

18 defined in section 101 of title 10, United States 

19 Code). 

Passed the Senate December 14, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3553 

AN ACT 

To provide a retroactive effective date for the prosuch promotions. sult of the suspension of Senate confirmation of whose military promotions were delayed as a re- motions of senior officers of the Armed Forces
#### Tommie MOORE, Petitioner, v. GRANT-SHOLK CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc., et al., Respondents.

No. 40928.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 28, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Stafford RICHE v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY.

No. 62079.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: Stafford Riche applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 356 So.2d 101.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted.
Exhibit No. 11 


                Statement re:  Computation of Per Share Earnings



        Fiscal Year Ended
           March 31, 1998          

   1.   Net Income                                   $5,844,000

   2.   Weighted average common shares outstanding    3,679,692

   3.   Basic earnings per share                          $1.59

   4.   Weighted average common shares outstanding    3,679,692

   5.   Common stock equivalents due to dilutive      
        effect of stock options                          83,826

   6.   Total weighted average common shares and
        equivalents outstanding for diluted earnings
        per share                                     3,763,518

   7.   Diluted earnings per share                        $1.55
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**WrittenStatement of the Chief Executive Officer**

 

I, Scott C. Hennessy, asPresident and Chief Executive Officer of True Temper Sports, Inc. (the“Company”), state and certify that this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for theperiod ended March 28, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended March 28,2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/   Scott C. Hennessy                                             |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Scott C. Hennessy                                                                  |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)  May 12, 2004 |   |

 

----
<PAGE>








                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                          China World Trade Corporation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

This Agreement dated 8 September, 2002 entered into between and by:

PARTY A: China World Trade Corporation, c/o 4th Floor Goldlion Network Center,
         138 Tiyu Road East, Tianhe, Guangzhou, the PRC 510620

PARTY B: James Mak

                                    RECITALS

         Party A is a public company with business provided in the major areas
of business recreational club, online trading services, and trading brokerage
and agency services; and Party A owed Party B a total amount of US$87,500.00
(the "Consideration Amount") of management fee as of 31 July 2002.

WHEREAS:

1.       Party B agrees to convert the Consideration Amount that Party A owned
         into the shares of the common stock of Party A which shall rank
         pari-passu to the existing common stock; and Party A agrees to issue or
         cause to issue a total of EIGHTY-SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED (87,500)
         POST 30-TO-1 REVERSE SPLIT SHARES of its common stock to Party B for
         the settlement of the Consideration Amount (the "Transaction").

2.       Party A agrees to pay for all the expenses in relation to the issuance
         of its shares of common stock to Party B.

3.       Upon signing of this Agreement and the completion of the issuance of
         shares of the common stock of Party A to Party B, neither Party A nor
         Party B would claim the counter party for any form of additional damage
         and/or settlement regarding the Consideration Amount.

4.       Both parties agree to keep all information regarding the Transaction
         and its business or affairs which are known to the Parties in
         connection with this Agreement strictly confidential and shall release
         such information only to parties authorized by either party.

5.       This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Hong Kong Special
         Administrative Region and the Parties shall submit to the jurisdiction
         thereof.

         For and on behalf of                     For and on behalf of
         Party A                                  Party B


         /s/ John Hui                             /s/ James Mak
         ------------------------------           ------------------------------
         Mr. John HUI                             James Mak
# EUR-Lex - 32005M3961 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005M3961

**Commission Decision of 07/10/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3961 - PERMIRA-KKR / SBS BROADCASTING) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

| |Brussels, 07.10.2005

SG-Greffe(2005) D/205409

To the notifying party

Subject : Case No. COMP/M.3961 – Permira-KKR/SBS Broadcasting Notification of 02.09.05 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 224, 13.09.2005, page 2

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

1. On 02.09.2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking PKS Media S.à.r.l. (“PKS”, Luxembourg), jointly controlled by Permira Holdings Limited (“Permira”, Guernsey) and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (“KKR”, USA), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking SBS Broadcasting SA (“SBS”, Luxembourg) by way of purchase of shares and assets.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for PKS: specially created acquisition vehicle;

- for Permira : private equity fund;

- for KKR : private equity investment company;

- for SBS: free-to-air and pay television, radio broadcasting and publication of TV and radio guides.

2. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph b, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004[2].

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
Service Mark License Amendment



 
Exhibit 10.11

 
Service Mark License Amendment

 
This Service Mark License Amendment
(“Agreement”) is made as of the last dated signature below by and between AT&T Corp for itself and for the benefit of each of its Subsidiaries and Affiliates (collectively “AT&T”) and Alestra S. de R.L. de
C. V. (“Alestra”). 
 
Recitals

 
WHEREAS, AT&T and Alestra are parties to that certain
Amended and Restated Service Mark License Agreement dated as of October 19, 1996 pursuant to which Alestra pays AT&T a royalty rate for, inter alia, the right to use the AT&T Brand (“Service Mark Agreement”) ; and

 
WHEREAS, AT&T and Alestra wish to amend the royalty rate in
the Service Mark Agreement. 
 
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration for
the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged by the parties), the parties each agree as follows: 
 

	 	1.	 	Effective upon execution of this Agreement, the royalty rate and fees set forth in section 5.1 of the Service Mark Agreement for the Royalty Periods covering Year
2003 and beyond are revised to a fee which is equal to (a) Three Million U.S. Dollars ($3,000,000) or (b) one percent (1%) of Alestra’s EBITDA whichever amount is greater (“Service Mark Fee”). AT&T shall re-invest sixty-seven
percent (67%) of the Service Mark Fee in the development of the AT&T Brand in Mexico. 

 

	 	2.	 	Terms capitalized but not defined in this Agreement shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Service Mark Agreement.  

 

	 	3.	 	This Agreement shall be governed by, construed and interpreted in accordance with, the substantive laws of the State of New York without regard to its conflict of
laws provisions. All disputes, controversies, or claims, whether based in contract, tort, statute, fraud, misrepresentation or any other legal theory, arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be resolved as provided by the provisions found
in Article XII of the JVA. 

 

	 	4.	 	This Agreement shall not be amended, altered, modified, changed or rescinded except by an instrument in writing signed by the parties hereto.


 

	 	5.	 	This Agreement is effective as from the date of the last signature below. 

 

	 	6.	 	This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one
instrument. Each counterpart may consist of a number of copies each signed by less than all, but together signed by all the parties. 

 









 

	 	7.	 	The provision of this Agreement contain the entire agreement of the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supercede all prior agreements and
understandings relating to the subject matter hereof. 

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate originals by its duly authorized representatives as of the last dated signature below. 
 

	 Alestra S. de R.L. de C.V.
	 	 AT&T Corp.

	 	 	 

 

	
	 By:    /s/    Alestra S. de R.L. de
C.V.  
	 	 By:    /s/    AT&T
Corp.        

	 Name:
	 	 Name:

	 Date:
	 	 Date:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54154-54155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33489]


Georgia Northeastern Railroad Company, Inc.--Lease and Operation 
Exemption--Georgia Department of Transportation

    Georgia Northeastern Railroad Company, Inc., a Class III rail 
common carrier, has filed a notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to 
lease from the Georgia Department of Transportation and operate three 
rail lines in the State of Georgia as follows: (i) From Valuation 
Station 20975+35 (milepost 382.47), at McCaysville, to Valuation 
Station 21726+83 (milepost 396.7), at Blue

[[Page 54155]]

Ridge, a distance of 14.23 miles in Fannin County; (ii) from Valuation 
Station 21726+83 (milepost 396.7), at Blue Ridge, to Valuation Station 
22154+46 (milepost 404.8), at White Path, a distance of 8.1 miles in 
Fannin and Gilmer Counties; and (iii) from Valuation Station 21556+55 
(milepost 393.47) on the north leg of the wye including the south leg 
of the wye, at Murphy Junction, to Valuation Station 21706+72 (milepost 
396.32), in Mineral Bluff, a distance of 2.85 miles in Fannin County.
    The transaction is expected to be consummated on or after the 
effective date of the exemption. Because the notice of exemption was 
filed on October 3, 1997, the transaction can be consummated no sooner 
than October 10, 1997.
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke does not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33489, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Kevin R. Armbruster, Esq., Cushing, Morris, Armbruster & 
Jones, LLP, Suite 2110, International Tower, 229 Peachtree Street, 
N.E., Atlanta, GA 30303.

    Decided: October 8, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27603 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Description of Bonus for CEO & President



Exhibit 10.1 
 
Bonus Arrangement for Chief Executive Officer and President 
 
Fastenal Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President is paid a bonus
under an individual bonus arrangement. Under this arrangement, the bonus for any quarter is calculated based on the amount by which the Company’s consolidated pre-tax income for such quarter exceeds the Company’s consolidated pre-tax
income for the same quarter in the prior year.