alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Donald Emett LANGLOIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-602.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 19, 1969.

Robert W. Rawlins, Public Defender, and John M. Gilbert, Asst. Public Defender. Tampa, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PIERCE, Judge.

Appellant Donald Emett Langlois appeals to this Court from a judgment of conviction and sentence to life imprisonment entered against him consequent upon a verdict of guilty being returned by a jury after trial upon information charging him with murder in the second degree in the shooting to death of one Valerie Jean Winegarner in Hillsborough County on June 29, 1967.

The only point urged here and argued before this Court in behalf of Langlois as to why the judgment appealed should be reversed is that the trial Court erred in admitting into evidence the confession made by Langlois to investigating officers on the day after the shooting. It seems to be conceded by counsel for Langlois that he did consent to giving the confession in the presence of a preacher, one Reverend Bradshaw, and investigating officer Wood. Reverend Bradshaw had been sent to the jail to confer and advise with Langlois by the latter’s employer, which came about at Langlois’ express request to his employer.

The trial Judge held an extensive hearing in the absence of the jury for purpose of determining the legal adrhissibility of the confession before it was given in evidence. The facts surrounding the giving of the confession were gone into most fully. Lan-glois himself testified, as did the investigating officer. The trial Court found the confession to have been given freely and voluntarily and that no constitutional right of Langlois was violated in the process.

It would serve no good purpose, nor would it substantially contribute to the body of the law, to discuss at length the facets of testimony adduced at the collateral hearing as to admissibility. Suffice to say that we have carefully examined the *429record and find ample support in the testimony to sustain the action of the trial Judge in admitting the confession. There was therefore no error in such ruling.

That being the only point raised upon behalf of appellant Langlois in this Court, and it having been determined adversely to him, the judgment of conviction appealed from is thereupon—

Affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
#### James Henry WOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-34.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Jan. 20, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 13, 1970.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Horace A. Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

SPECTOR, Judge.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction in a jury trial on the charge of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon as proscribed by Section 790.23, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The element of the crime charged which appellant contends was not sufficiently proven was possession. Our review of the record shows that the arresting officers testified that the appellant was arrested around noon in a motel room in Jacksonville. At the time of the arrest, which incidentally was pursuant to a warrant, appellant was found with the gun covered by a pillowcase which, together with the gun, was between appellant’s legs with the gun butt sticking out in view of the arresting officers. Basically, appellant contends that this is not such possession as is contemplated by the statute. We *485disagree. That it was covered fully or partially by a pillowcase renders the gun no less in appellant’s possession than had it been fully concealed in a pocket of his clothing. To come within the purview of the statute, a firearm need not be held in the hands of the accused. It is sufficient to show that the firearm is in the “care, custody, possession or control” of the person charged. Evidence showing the gun to be clutched by the legs of appellant, even though it is partially covered by a pillowcase, fully satisfies the language of the statute. See Maloney v. State, 146 So.2d 581 (Fla.App.1962).

Affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON, J., concur.
Exhibit 10.32


   Summary of Management Incentive Plan And Share the Success
                             Program


Management Incentive Program

The  Company's  Management Incentive Plan ("MIP")  provides  that
participating  management employees may receive a  percentage  of
their  salary  as  a bonus.  Generally all full- time,  permanent
exempt  manager level employees participate in MIP.  MIP payments
are  calculated  as a percentage of base compensation,  based  on
performance  by  the  Company  relative  to  criteria  that   are
established  and  weighted by the Compensation Committee  of  the
Board of Directors.  Those criteria are based on measurements  of
the  Company's performance deemed to be relevant to manager level
employees on a broad scale, and to a level of performance that is
deemed  to be attainable, indicative of corporate accomplishment,
and  likely  to  lead  to  corporate success.  They  may  include
operational   criteria   and  corporate  financial   performance.
Operational   criteria  (such  as  completion   factor,   on-time
performance, etc.) will be designed to target performance  levels
deemed to be desirable, and will generally be similar to criteria
used  to establish bonus plans for non-exempt (hourly) employees.
Two  or  more levels of participation may be created, to  reflect
different   levels  of  participation  for  various   levels   of
management.   Frequency of payment, not less than annually,  will
be determined by the Compensation Committee.


Share the Success Program

The  Company's  Share the Success Program ("Share  the  Success")
provides  that  eligible hourly employees (not  participating  in
MIP)  may  receive  a  percentage of their  salary  as  a  bonus.
Eligibility is based on minimum hours and length of tenure, to be
established  by  the Compensation Committee.  Share  the  Success
payments  are paid as a lump sum per performance target achieved,
based on performance by the Company relative to criteria that are
established  and  weighted by the Compensation Committee  of  the
Board of Directors.  Those criteria are based on measurements  of
the  Company's  performance deemed to be  relevant  to  employees
generally,  and to a level of performance that is  deemed  to  be
attainable, indicative of corporate accomplishment, and likely to
lead to corporate success.  They may include operational criteria
and  corporate financial performance. Operational criteria  (such
as completion factor, on-time performance, etc.) will be designed
to  target  performance levels deemed to be desirable,  and  will
generally be similar to criteria used for MIP.
#### Helen E. GEGENHEIMER, Appellant, v. George J. GEGENHEIMER, Appellee.

No. 69-859.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 15, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 17, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
No. 00-956.

#### Gealer *v.*United States et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 00-522 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Cooperation 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the UNITED KINGDOM OF 

GREAT BRITAIN AND 

NORTHERN IRELAND 

Signed at Washington May 22, 2000 

 with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN 

AND NORTHERN IRELAND 

 Defense: Cooperation 

 Memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Washington May 22, 2000; 

 Entered into force May 22, 2000. 

 With annexes.
Exhibit (h)(9)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Financial Services Firm (“you” or “Intermediary”),

 

As principal underwriter of the DWS Funds, we (or a predecessor firm) or our affiliate have entered into a selling group or other agreement or agreements (the "Agreement") with you to permit you, as applicable, to sell, service, or facilitate trading in shares of the DWS Funds (collectively, the "Shares").  

 

This amendment to the Agreement is entered into as of the date indicated in the signature block below, with an effective date of October 16, 2007, or such earlier date as of which you begin providing the Shareholder information described below, and includes the following provisions: 

 

**1. Agreement to Provide Information.**Intermediary agrees to provide the Fund, upon written request, the taxpayer identification number (“TIN”), the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (“ITIN”), or other government-issued identifier (“GII”), if known, of any or all Shareholder(s) of the account and the amount, date, name or other identifier of any investment professional(s) associated with the Shareholder(s) or account (if known), and transaction type (purchase, redemption, transfer, or exchange) of every purchase, redemption, transfer, or exchange of Shares held through each account maintained by the Intermediary during the period covered by the request.

 

**2. Period Covered by Request.**Requests must set forth a specific period, not to exceed 90 days from the date of the request, for which transaction information is sought. The Fund may request transaction information older than 90 days from the date of the request as it deems necessary to investigate compliance with policies established by the Fund for the purpose of eliminating or reducing any dilution of the value of the outstanding shares issued by the Fund.

 

**3. Form and Timing of Response.**

 

(a)  Intermediary agrees to provide, promptly upon request of the Fund or its designee, the requested information specified in paragraph 1 above. If requested by the Fund or its designee, Intermediary agrees to use best efforts to determine promptly whether any specific person about whom it has received the identification and transaction information specified in paragraph 1 is itself a financial intermediary (“indirect intermediary”) and, upon further request of the Fund or its designee, promptly either (i) provide 

 

----
Exhibit 21.1


                             SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES OF
                   MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                              As of April 30, 2001


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Subsidiary                                         Ownership %     Incorporation                      Parent
------------------------------------------------   -----------   ---------------     ---------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>
BusLease, Inc.                                            100%          Delaware     Motor Coach Industries International, Inc.
MCI Sales and Service, Inc.                               100%          Delaware     Motor Coach Industries International, Inc.
MCI Service Parts, Inc.                                   100%          Delaware     Motor Coach Industries International, Inc.
MCII Financial Services Inc.                              100%          Delaware     Motor Coach Industries International, Inc.
MCI Acceptance Corp.                                      100%          Delaware     MCII Financial Services Inc.
MCII Funding Inc.                                         100%          Delaware     MCII Financial Services Inc.
MCII Financial Services II, Inc.                          100%          Delaware     Motor Coach Industries International, Inc.
MCIL Holdings, Ltd.                                       100%            Canada     Motor Coach Industries International, Inc.
Motor Coach Industries Limited                            100%            Canada     MCIL Holdings, Ltd.
Frank Fair Industries Ltd.                                100%          Manitoba     Motor Coach Industries Limited
Motor Coach Industries, Inc.                              100%          Delaware     Motor Coach Industries International, Inc.
Motor Coach Industries Mexico, S.A. de C.V.             99.99%            Mexico     Motor Coach Industries International, Inc.
Motor Coach Industries Manufactura, S.A. de C.V.        99.99%            Mexico     Motor Coach Industries Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
Servicios Administrativos
  Motor Coach Industries Mexico, S.A. de C.V.           99.99%            Mexico     Motor Coach Industries Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
Servicios Sahagun, S.A. de C.V.                         99.99%            Mexico     Motor Coach Industries Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
TMO Holdings of Canada, Ltd.                              100%            Canada     Motor Coach Industries International, Inc.
Transit Bus International, Inc.                           100%          Delaware     Motor Coach Industries International, Inc.
Greyhound Overseas Service, Inc.                          100%    Virgin Islands     Transit Bus International, Inc.
</TABLE>
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.18 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EXTRADITION 

 Instrument Amending the 

Convention of May 7, 1908 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and PORTUGAL 

Signed at Washington July 14, 2005 

with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 PORTUGAL 

 Extradition 

Instrument amending the convention of May 7, 1908. 

Signed at Washington July 14, 2005; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-14, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-12, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Instruments of Ratification at 

 Washington June 5, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010. 

With annex.
State of Israel

Ministry of Transport

Civil Aviation Authority

Page 1 of 1 C:\Documents and Settings\pascals\Local Settings\Temporary Internet 

Files\Content.Outlook\98EM6Z15\AD 01-12-02-02R1 Apr 2013.doc 

AD 01-12-02-02

 Date: April 23, 2013R1

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

This Airworthiness Directive, issued by the Civil Aviation Authority in accordance with the

Israeli Aviation Regulations, applies to an aircraft for which our records list you as the registered 

owner. It affects aviation safety and requires your immediate attention. No person may operate an 

aircraft to which an Airworthiness Directive applies, except in accordance with that Directive.

APPLIES TO: Gulfstream Aerospace LP (GALP) Model G150 aircraft, all serial numbers, 

certificated in any category.

SUBJECT: Revision of runway slope and anti-ice corrections to V1 and take-off

 distance values.

REASON: Updating / correcting of the Performance section "TAKE-OFF DISTANCE

 RUNWAY SLOPE CORRECTIONS: ALL FLAP SETTINGS” & “TAKE-OFF DISTANCE

 ANTI-ICE CORRECTIONS: ALL FLAPS AND RUNWAY CONDITIONS

Reason for

Revision 1: Rev. 17 of the AFM contains permanent corrections which 

supersede/remove TR-3 from the AFM, as well as address additional 

corrections identified during preparation of the new performance data.

ACTION: This AD mandates revised limitations in the G150 AFM, pertaining to 

the Performance Section. Each operator must incorporate Rev.17 to the 

G150 AFM and remove previous AFM TR 3 dated December 14, 2012. 

COMPLIANCE: Compliance within 60 days from the effective date of this AD.

EFECTIVE DATE: Revision 1: May 24, 2013.

Initial issue: March 24, 2012

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Saul Pascal, Engineering and

Manufacturing Branch, CAAI – Golan House, Golan Street P.O.B 1101, Airport City, Israel 70100.

Telephone: 972-3-9774-583, Fax: 972-3-9774-592, e-mail: pascals@mot.gov.il.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Exhibit 10.2 
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
 
In connection
with the Annual Report of Anchor Lamina Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, John C. Tough, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 
 

	 	1.	 	the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

	 	2.	 	the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 

	
	 	 	 /S/    JOHN C.
TOUGH        


	 	 	 John C. Tough,
 Vice President and
 Chief Financial Officer



 
Dated: February 27, 2003
BANK UNITED CORP.

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each Director of Bank United Corp.
whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Barry C.
Burkholder and Jonathon K. Heffron and each of them, with full power to act
without the other, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full and
several power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any
and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report of Bank United Corp. on Form 10-K
for fiscal year 1998, and any or all amendments and supplements thereto and to
file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they or he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his substitute, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                           TITLE          SIGNATURE                     DATE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                           <C>       <C>                            <C>
Lewis S. Ranieri              Director  /s/ LEWIS S. RANIERI           December 18, 1998


Salvatore A. Ranieri          Director  /s/ SALVATORE A. RANIERI       December 18, 1998



Barry C. Burkholder           Director  /s/ BARRY C. BURKHOLDER        December 18, 1998


Lawrence Chimerine, Ph.D.     Director  /s/LAWRENCE CHIMERINE, PH.D.   December 18, 1998

David M. Golush               Director  /s/DAVID M. GOLUSH             December 18, 1998
<PAGE>
BANK UNITED CORP.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Page -2-

Paul M. Horvitz, Ph.D.        Director  /s/PAUL M. HORVITZ, PH. D.     December 18, 1998

Alan E. Master                Director  /s/ALAN E. MASTER              December 18, 1998

Anthony J. Nocella            Director  /s/ANTHONY J. NOCELLA          December 18, 1998

Scott A. Shay                 Director  /s/SCOTT A. SHAY               December 18, 1998

Patricia A. Sloan             Director  /s/PATRICIA A. SLOAN           December 18, 1998

Michael S. Stevens            Director  /s/MICHAEL S. STEVENS          December 18, 1998

Kendrick R. Wilson III        Director  /s/KENDRICK R. WILSON III      December 18, 1998
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Derek Schneideman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Derek Schneideman
                                        Derek Schneideman
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 19, 2008
EXHIBIT 32

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cherokee Banking Company, (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  Dennis  W.  Burnette, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  and A.R. Roberts, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.


This 12th day of August 2004.


/s/ Dennis W. Burnette
----------------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ A.R. Roberts, III
----------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>