alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stanley GELMAN and Geraldine Gelman, his wife, Appellants, v. MIAMI ELEVATOR COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-442.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 11, 1971.

*157Martin P. Shachat, North Miami Beach, for appellants.

Dixon, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell and James F. Crowder, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PEARSON, Chief Judge.

The appellants as plaintiffs, sued the operators of a department store and the ap-pellee, Miami Elevator Company, as a result of injuries which occurred upon alighting from an elevator. This appeal is from a summary final judgment for the appellee, Miami Elevator Company. The allegation of negligence as to the Elevator Company is that “the defendant Miami Elevator Company was negligent and careless of [sic] the aforesaid maintenance resulting in serious and permanent injury to the plaintiff.” The pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file show that there was a written contract between appellee and the operators of the department store whereby the appellee undertook to maintain the mechanical condition of the elevator.

The trial court entered the summary judgment upon a finding as follows:

> “The Court finds that a contract between a proprietor and a service contractor is not of benefit to a business invitee and the latter is not a party to such contract.”

Without discussing whether or not the finding of the trial court is correct as an abstract statement of law, we hold that it is not a sufficient basis for summary judgment in this case. The appellant as plaintiff has attempted to state a cause of action for negligence in the maintenance of the elevator. Such actions have been held to be maintainable by an injured member of the public against a party responsible by contract for the maintenance. Gallichio v. Corporate Group Service, Inc., Fla.App. 1969, 227 So.2d 519; see 26 Am.Jur.2d Elevators and Escalators § 17. Summary judgment for the defendant may be entered only upon a showing that the plaintiff cannot establish a prima facie case. The burden to make this showing is upon the movant. Matarese v. Leesburg Elks Club, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 606.

The summary judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
#### Gennero GALTIERI, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 39665.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 23, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 14, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 234 So.2d 172.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3502 

AN ACT 

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to prevent consumer reporting agencies from furnishing consumer reports under certain circumstances, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3502 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homebuyers Privacy 

3 Protection Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF PRESCREENING REPORT RE5 QUESTS. 

6 Section 604(c) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 

7 U.S.C. 1681b(c)) is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(4) TREATMENT OF PRESCREENING REPORT

10 REQUESTS.— 

11 ‘‘(A) DEFINITIONS.—In this paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(i) CREDIT UNION.—The term ‘cred13 it union’ means a Federal credit union or 

14 a State credit union, as those terms are 

15 defined in section 101 of the Federal Cred16 it Union Act (12 U.S.C 1752). 

17 ‘‘(ii) INSURED DEPOSITORY INSTITU18 TION.—The term ‘insured depository insti19 tution’ has the meaning given the term in 

20 section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance 

21 Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(c)). 

22 ‘‘(iii) RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE

23 LOAN.—The term ‘residential mortgage 

24 loan’ has the meaning given the term in 

25 section 1503 of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Li26 censing Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5102). 
3 

†S 3502 ES

1 ‘‘(iv) SERVICER.—The term ‘servicer’ 

2 has the meaning given the term in section 

3 6(i) of the Real Estate Settlement Proce4 dures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2605(i)). 

5 ‘‘(B) LIMITATION.—If a person requests a 

6 consumer report from a consumer reporting 

7 agency in connection with a credit transaction 

8 involving a residential mortgage loan, that 

9 agency may not, based in whole or in part on 

10 that request, furnish a consumer report to an11 other person under this subsection unless that 

12 other person— 

13 ‘‘(i) has submitted documentation to 

14 that agency certifying that such other per15 son has, pursuant to paragraph (1)(A), the 

16 authorization of the consumer to whom the 

17 consumer report relates; or 

18 ‘‘(ii)(I) has originated a current resi19 dential mortgage loan of the consumer to 

20 whom the consumer report relates; 

21 ‘‘(II) is the servicer of a current resi22 dential mortgage loan of the consumer to 

23 whom the consumer report relates; or 

24 ‘‘(III)(aa) is an insured depository in25 stitution or credit union; and 
4 

†S 3502 ES

1 ‘‘(bb) holds a current account for the 

2 consumer to whom the consumer report re3 lates.’’. 

4 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

5 This Act, and the amendments made by this Act, 

6 shall take effect on the date that is 90 days after the date 

7 of enactment of this Act. 

Passed the Senate December 17 (legislative day, December 16), 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3502 

AN ACT 

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to prevent 

for other purposes. sumer reports under certain circumstances, and consumer reporting agencies from furnishing con-
Exhibit 23.1   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS   We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-03307 and
File No. 333-28849) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-194211) of RFS Hotel Investors,
Inc. and Form S-4 (File No. 333-84334) of RFS Partnership, L.P. of our reports
dated January 29, 2003, except for Note 13 as to which the date is March 3,
2003, relating to the financial statements, which appear in the RFS Hotel
Investors, Inc. and RFS Partnership, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002.  We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 29, 2003
relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K.  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPDallas, TexasMarch 19, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3412 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3412

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To redesignate the Richard H. Poff Federal Building located at 210 
Franklin Road Southwest in Roanoke, Virginia, as the ``Reuben E. Lawson 
              Federal Building'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reuben E. Lawson Federal Building 
Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) Reuben E. Lawson dedicated his life and career to 
        promoting the ideals of equality and inclusion as a lawyer for 
        the Roanoke chapter of the National Association for the 
        Advancement of Colored People (commonly known as the ``NAACP'') 
        who actively worked to end segregation in Southwest Virginia;
            (2) arguing a number of significant cases in the Western 
        District of Virginia, Reuben E. Lawson fought to ensure the 
        enforcement of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 
        483 (1954), so that schools in the Roanoke region would be 
        fully integrated; and
            (3) Southwest Virginians are indebted to Reuben E. Lawson 
        for his important work in ending segregation, and it is fitting 
        that he be remembered in the current home of the court in which 
        he valiantly fought.

SEC. 3. REUBEN E. LAWSON FEDERAL BUILDING.

    (a) Redesignation.--The Richard H. Poff Federal Building located at 
210 Franklin Road Southwest in Roanoke, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Reuben E. Lawson Federal Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Richard H. Poff 
Federal Building shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Reuben E. 
Lawson Federal Building''.

            Passed the Senate February 27, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3412

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To redesignate the Richard H. Poff Federal Building located at 210 
Franklin Road Southwest in Roanoke, Virginia, as the ``Reuben E. Lawson 
              Federal Building'', and for other purposes.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SS. 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Technest Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company do hereby certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Shekhar Wadekar

/s/  Bruce WarwickShekhar Wadekar

Chief Executive Officer

Bruce Warwick

Principal Financial OfficerDate: May 23, 2011

Date: May 23, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3432 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3432

 To permit the use of NATO and major non-NATO ally dredge ships in the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2023

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To permit the use of NATO and major non-NATO ally dredge ships in the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Allied Partnership and Port 
Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. DREDGING; DREDGED MATERIAL.

    (a) Dredging.--Section 55109 of title 46, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``or (c)'' after 
        ``subsection (b)'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Dredging by NATO-Affiliated Vessels.--
            ``(1) In general.--A vessel described in paragraph (2) may 
        engage in dredging in the navigable waters of the United 
        States.
            ``(2) Vessels.--A vessel described in this paragraph is a 
        vessel--
                    ``(A) documented under the laws of a country that 
                is a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization;
                    ``(B) built by a country that is a member of the 
                North Atlantic Treaty Organization or a major non-NATO 
                ally (as defined in section 2350a(i) of title 10); and
                    ``(C) for which a majority of the owners and 
                operators of the vessel are entities incorporated in a 
                country that is a member of the North Atlantic Treaty 
                Organization.''.
    (b) Excluding Dredged Material From Transportation Requirements.--
            (1) In general.--Section 55110 of title 46, United States 
        Code, is amended--
                    (A) in the section heading, by striking ``or 
                dredged material'' and inserting ``(excluding dredged 
                material)''; and
                    (B) by striking ``or dredged material'' and 
                inserting ``(excluding dredged material)''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--The analysis for chapter 551 of 
        title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking the item 
        relating to section 55110 and inserting the following:

``Sec. 55110. Transportation of valueless material (excluding dredged 
                            material).''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20896 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MICHAEL TURNER, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-140-2

-------------------- June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Turner on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Turner has not filed a response to counsel's motion and brief.Our independent review of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion forNo. 01-20896 -2- leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
#### CHAMPION MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Incorporated, Petitioner, v. Leo C. SARDELLA et al., Respondents.

No. 40894.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 28, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1,126,243
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,204,238
<PP&E>                                         1,004,772
<DEPRECIATION>                                 358,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,730,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          614,374
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       43,981
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,730,679
<SALES>                                        34,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               37,295
<CGS>                                          35,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  456,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             408,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (862,671)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (862,671)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (862,671)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.03)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32(B)


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Peter Szigeti,  the Chief Accounting  Officer of Euroweb  International
Corp. (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2005 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
      Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


Dated: March 29, 2006


                                                 /s/Peter Szigeti
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name: Peter Szigeti
                                                 Title: Chief Accounting Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3389 

To authorize safety and prevention training programs for fishing vessel 

operators and crewmembers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 4, 2023 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. SULLIVAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. 

MURKOWSKI, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To authorize safety and prevention training programs for 

fishing vessel operators and crewmembers, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fishing Industry Safe5 ty, Health, and Wellness Improvement Act of 2023’’ or 

6 the ‘‘FISH Wellness Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3389 IS

1 SEC. 2. SAFETY STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN FISHING VES2 SELS. 

3 Section 4502 of title 46, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (i)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

7 (i) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by strik8 ing ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon; 

9 (ii) by redesignating subparagraph 

10 (B) as subparagraph (C); and 

11 (iii) by inserting after subparagraph 

12 (A) the following: 

13 ‘‘(B) to conduct safety and prevention training 

14 that addresses behavioral and physical health risks, 

15 to include substance use disorder and worker fa16 tigue, facing fishing vessel operators and crew17 members; and’’; 

18 (B) by striking paragraph (3); 

19 (C) by redesignating paragraph (4) as 

20 paragraph (3); and 

21 (D) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by 

22 subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘$3,000,000 for 

23 fiscal year 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘$6,000,000 for 

24 each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025’’; 

25 (2) in subsection (j)— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3389 IS

1 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and se2 vere weather detection’’ and inserting ‘‘severe 

3 weather detection, and understanding and miti4 gating behavioral and physical health risks, to 

5 include substance use disorder and worker fa6 tigue, facing members of the commercial fishing 

7 industry’’; 

8 (B) by striking paragraph (3); 

9 (C) by redesignating paragraph (4) as 

10 paragraph (3); and 

11 (D) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by 

12 subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘$3,000,000 for 

13 fiscal year 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘$6,000,000 for 

14 each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025’’; 

15 (3) by redesignating subsection (k) as sub16 section (l); and 

17 (4) by inserting after subsection (j) the fol18 lowing: 

19 ‘‘(k) From amounts appropriated under subsections 

20 (i)(3) and (j)(3) for a fiscal year, the Secretary may trans21 fer to the Secretary of Health and Human Services funds 

22 to pay for the Secretary’s administration of the grant pro23 grams under subsections (i) and (j) for such fiscal year.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Amended Consulting Agreement-Blake Ransom



Exhibit 4.1(a) 
 
Amendment No. 2 to Consulting Agreement 
Between Calypte Biomedical Corporation 
and
Blake Ransom 
 
This Agreement amends and modifies the
Consulting Agreement between Calypte Biomedical Corporation (“Calypte” or the “Company”) and Blake Ransom (“Consultant”) dated November 20, 2002 and is effective as of February 14, 2003. 
 
Whereas, the Company desires to extend the time period during which Consultant
will provide services to the Company pursuant to the above referenced Consulting Agreement and Consultant is agreeable to extending the time for providing such services. 
 
Now therefore, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

	  	 1.	  	 The term of Consultant’s Consulting Agreement shall be extended and, by virtue of this Amendment, shall terminate on December 31, 2003 rather than November 20,
2003. 

 

	  	 2.	  	 Included specifically as an additional service is a confidential introduction to a high profile celebrity to work with the company to increase awareness of our
products in the marketplace and assist the company from the business side with potential of Board Membership. 

 

	  	 3.	  	 In consideration for the extension and expansion of the services to be performed by Consultant, the Company will immediately grant to Consultant 2,000,000 shares of
its registered common stock. This replaces the 2,100,000 options deferred in Amendment 1. Additionally, the Consultant will receive a warrant to purchase 7,000,000 shares of registered common stock of the Company at $0.05 per share, for an aggregate
purchase price of $350,000. The warrant is immediately exercisable upon grant and will expire on May 14, 2003. All compensation pursuant to the Consulting Agreement and this Amendment is fully earned upon execution of this amendment. All
compensation pursuant to the Consulting Agreement and this Amendment is fully earned upon execution of this amendment. 

 

	  	 4.	  	 The Consultant will provide to Calypte’s Executive Chairman a written report of services rendered and results thereof each 90 days of this extended contract
within 30 days of the contract’s quarter end. 

 

	  	 5.	  	 All other terms and conditions of the Consultant Agreement dated November 20, 2002 remain unchanged. 

 

	  Consultant:
	  	  	  	  CALYPTE BIOMEDICAL
CORPORATION

	
	  By:
	  	  /s/    BLAKE
RANSOM        

	  	  	  	  By:
	  	  /s/    RICHARD D.
BROUNSTEIN        


	  	  	  Blake Ransom
	  	  	  	  	  	  Richard Brounstein
  Executive Vice President & CFO
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo20837 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.