alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Icenhour, Melissa K.

From: Bill Herz [WCHerz@tfi.org]

Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 4:41 PM

To: 'Neuffer.Bill@epamail.epa.gov'

Cc: Icenhour, Melissa K.

Subject: RE: Nitric Acid Product Concentration

Hi Bill:

Responding to your December 23rd email, TFI's members that responded to your inquiry report that they 

determine nitric acid concentration on at least a daily basis (most only determine it on a daily basis, but some on 

a more frequent interval). None of the members use the ASTM standard that you reference. The members 

either (1) analyze product concentration via titration in a manner similar to the ASTM standard (for example, 

the members may use methyl red as an indicator instead of phenolpthalein, or they use an automatic pH probe 

and titrate to an endpoint of 5.3), or (2) determine nitric acid concentration by temperature and specific gravity 

(or density). 

Bill

-----Original Message-----

From: Neuffer.Bill@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Neuffer.Bill@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 11:30 AM

To: Bill Herz

Cc: Icenhour, Melissa K.

Subject: Nitric Acid Product Concentration

Bill,

 Hope you are well. We may add to the NSPS a requirement to daily

monitor the concentration of nitric acid in addition to the present

requirement of daily production rate. i assume the industry monitors

the concentration on a daily if not hourly basis.

 Doing a goggle search, it appears that ASTM E1584-00(2005)e1 -

Standard Method for Assay of Nitric Acid - may be applicable as the

summary says this method is suitable for concentrations between 50 and

70%. Is this the normal method the industry uses? What frequency does

the industry monitor concentration?

 Thanks

 Happy Holidays !
2

Bill Neuffer

Metals and Minerals Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

(D 243-02)

US Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone - 919-541-5435

Fax - 919 - 541-3207

E-mail - neuffer.bill@epa.gov

Office Location: 109 TW Alexander Drive

RTP, NC (D 231C)

Overnight mail address:

US EPA

Mail Code D243-02

109 TW Alexander Drive

RTP, NC 27709
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Hills, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 9, 2006
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ David B. Hills     
|Name:                  |  | David B. Hills         
|Title:                 |  | Chief Executive Officer

I, John Simonelli, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 9, 2006
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ John Simonelli     
|Name:                  |  | John Simonelli         
|Title:                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Norma DORADO, formerly known as Norma Rodriguez, Appellee.

No. 69-389.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 1, 1970.

Rehearing Denied June 5, 1970.

James E. Thompson, of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey & Kinney, Tampa, for appellant.

Thomas E. Bissonnette and Peter P. Behuniak, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of Lincoln Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Hurst, 1933, 112 Fla. 350, 150 So. 722; Guarantee Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Jacobs, Fla.1952, 57 So.2d 845; Netherlands Insurance Company v. Fowler, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 692, and Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation v. Royals Farm Supply, Inc., Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 317.

LILES, A. C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
#### L & W CONTRACTORS, INC. & Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Walter M. SARTIN.

No. 45396.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 15, 1969.

Bryant & Stennis, Gulfport, for appellant.

Holmes & Dukes, Hattiesburg, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.6

                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                                   THE BYLAWS
                                       OF
                          MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC.



The entire paragraph of "Section 2. Number, Tenure and Qualification" in
"Article III - Board of Directors" in the Bylaws shall be deleted in its
entirety and shall be replaced with the following:

         "The number of directors of the corporation shall be no less than one
         or such other minimum number as is required by law. The directors shall
         be divided into three (3) classes designated as Class I, Class II and
         Class III, respectively. Directors shall be assigned to each class in
         accordance with a resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of
         Directors. At the first annual meeting of stockholders following the
         adoption and filing of this amendment to the By-laws, the term of
         office of the Class I directors shall expire and Class I directors
         shall be elected for a full term of three (3) years. At the second
         annual meeting following this amendment to the By-laws adoption, the
         term of office of the Class II directors shall expire and Class II
         directors shall be elected for a full term of three (3) years. At the
         third annual meeting of stockholders following the adoption and filing
         of this amendment to the By-laws, the term of office of the Class III
         directors shall expire and Class III directors shall be elected for a
         full term of three (3) years. At each succeeding annual meeting of
         stockholders, directors shall be elected for a full term of three (3)
         years to succeed the directors of the class whose terms expire at such
         annual meeting".

This amendment to the bylaws was adopted by the Board of Directors and approved
by the shareholders of the Corporation on June 29, 1999.


                                         ATTEST:



                                         --------------------------
                                         Secretary

June 29, 1999
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00011-CV

CHARLES GLEN HYDE, HYDEWAY, INC., AVIATION UTILITIES 

SERVICES, INC., AND TEXAS AIR 

CLASSICS

APPELLANTS

AND APPELLEES

V.

JIMMY RAY, TRENT CRAGIN, RAY 

FOSTER, AND LINDBERGH 

HANGER, L.L.C.

APPELLEES

AND APPELLANTS

------------

FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Cross-Appellants’ Unopposed Motion to Dismiss 

Appeal” filed by Jimmy Ray, Trent Cragin, Ray Foster, and Lindbergh Hanger, 

L.L.C. It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

dismiss the appeal of cross-appellants Jimmy Ray, Trent Cragin, Ray Foster, and 

Lindbergh Hanger, L.L.C. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

We have also considered the “Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal” filed 

by Charles Glen Hyde, Hyde-Way, Inc., Aviation Utilities Services, Inc., and 

Texas Air Classics. It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; 

therefore, we dismiss the appeal of appellants Charles Glen Hyde, Hyde-Way, 

Inc., Aviation Utilities Services, Inc., and Texas Air Classics. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Cost of the $175.00 appellate filing fee incurred by cross-appellants is 

taxed against appellants Charles Glen Hyde, Hyde-Way, Inc., Aviation Utilities 

Services, Inc., and Texas Air Classics. All other costs shall be borne by the party 

incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 24, 2011
258 La. 352

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Roland Joseph GIBSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51317.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 14, 1971.

In re: Roland Joseph Gibson applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writs denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54658-54659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27999]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATE: Weeks of October 20, 27, November 3, and 10, 1997.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

Matters to be considered:

Week of October 20

    There are no meetings the week of October 20.

Week of October 27--Tentative

Wednesday, October 29

11:30 a.m.
    Affirmation Session (public meeting) (if needed)
2:00 p.m.
    Briefing on Site Decommissioning Plan (SDMP) (public meeting) 
(Contact: John Hickey--301-415-7234)

Thursday, October 30

10:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.
    All Employees Meetings (public meetings) on ``The Green'' Plaza 
Area between buildings at White Flint (Contact: Bill Hill--301-415-
1661)

Week of November 3

Tuesday, November 4

2:00 p.m.
    Meeting with Commonwealth Edison (public meeting)

Wednesday, November 5

9:30 a.m.
    Briefing on Staff's Plans for 50.59 Regulatory Process Improvements 
(public meeting)
11:00 a.m.
    Affirmation Session (public meeting) (if needed)

Week of November 10

    There are no meetings the week of November 10.
    The schedule for commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 415-
1292.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Bill Hill (301) 415-1661.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1661).
    In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet 
system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission 
meeting schedule electronically, please send an

[[Page 54659]]

electronic message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#02756f6a426c70612c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4a3b9bc94baa6b7fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e5a55497e504c5d10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea8e819daa849889c48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>.
* * * * *
    Dated: October 17, 1997.
William M. Hill, Jr.
SECY Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27999 Filed 10-17-97; 2:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 27, 2009

s0120 

# Order

January 27, 2009

137520

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137520 COA: 278269 Macomb CC: 2 006-005463-FH MARVIN LAMONT FRANKLIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 18, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STEVEN GREEN, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 09-60 Erie

v. )

)

PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND )

PAROLE, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on

March 16, 2009 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [17], filed on January 19, 2010,

recommends that the Respondents’ motion to dismiss [16] be granted and the instant

petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as moot, inasmuch as the Petitioner

died of natural causes on January 7, 2010. No objections to the R&R have been filed. 

After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the

Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 21 day of June, 2010,

st

IT IS ORDERED that the Respondents’ motion to dismiss [16] be, and

hereby is, GRANTED and the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus be, and hereby

is, DISMISSED as moot.

The Report and Recommendation [17] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on January 19, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin 

SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:09-cv-00060-SJM-SPB Document 18 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 1
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-316.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CIVIL AVIATION 

Transport Services 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ZAMBIA 

Signed at Lusaka March 16, 2010 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 ZAMBIA 

Civil Aviation: Transport Services 

 Agreement signed at Lusaka 

 March 16, 2010; 

 Entered into force March 16, 2010. 

 With annexes.
# L_2005048EN.01004601.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 48/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 48/46

---

COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2005/143/CFSP

of 17 February 2005

amending Joint Action 2002/210/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and, in particular, Articles 14 and 25(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 11 March 2002 the Council adopted Joint Action 2002/210/CFSP (1) establishing a European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in order to ensure the follow-on to the United Nations International Police Task Force in Bosnia and Herzegovina as from 1 January 2003. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 11 March 2002 the Council adopted Joint Action 2002/210/CFSP (1) establishing a European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in order to ensure the follow-on to the United Nations International Police Task Force in Bosnia and Herzegovina as from 1 January 2003.

| (2) | The Political and Security Committee should be authorised to take the relevant decisions on the setting-up of a Committee of Contributors for the EUPM, in line with the document on ‘Consultations and Modalities for the Contribution of non-EU States to EU Civilian Crisis Management’ approved by the Council on 10 December 2002. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Political and Security Committee should be authorised to take the relevant decisions on the setting-up of a Committee of Contributors for the EUPM, in line with the document on ‘Consultations and Modalities for the Contribution of non-EU States to EU Civilian Crisis Management’ approved by the Council on 10 December 2002.

| (3) | Joint Action 2002/210/CFSP should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Joint Action 2002/210/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

The following paragraph shall be added to Article 8 of Joint Action 2002/210/CFSP:

‘4.   The Political and Security Committee shall take the relevant decisions on the setting-up of a Committee of Contributors.’

Article 2

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 17 February 2005.

For the Council

The President

J.-C. JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 70, 13.3.2002, p. 1. Joint Action as last amended by Joint Action 2003/188/CFSP (OJ L 73, 19.3.2003, p. 9).

1

---
EXHIBIT 12.1


                  UNITED STATES LEATHER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
                             (dollars in thousands)


                                                 Years Ended
                                                 December 31,
                                        1996         1995            1994

    Net Income                        $   --       $  4,583       $  4,148

    Add:
         Interest                         --         18,062         17,283
         Income tax expense and
         other taxes on income            --          4,373          4,685
         Extraordinary (gain) loss
         (net of taxes)                   --           (417)            --
                                      ------        -------        -------
              Earnings as defined         --        $26,601        $26,116
                                      ======        =======        =======

    Interest                              --        $18,062        $17,283
                                      ------        -------        -------
         Fixed charges as defined         --        $18,062        $17,283
                                      ======        =======        =======
    Ratio of earnings to fixed
    charges and preferred dividends       --         1.47            1.50
#### J. E. Howard CARLSON, Appellant, v. MEL OF HOLLYWOOD, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-701.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 13, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Ernest BOWMAN v. Constance Faye BOWMAN.

No. 62146.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: Ernest Bowman, applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Rapides. 355 So.2d 564.

Writ denied.
#### David FAIR, Petitioner, v. McCALL FRUIT COMPANY et al., Respondents. HELLER BROTHERS PACKING COMPANY and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. David FAIR and Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

Nos. 44068, 44081.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 24, 1974.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo20816 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
----

|   | · | Key Technology Holdings USA LLC, an Oregon limited liability company |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Suplusco Holding B.V., a Netherlands corporation |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Key Technology B.V., a Netherlands corporation |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Key Technology Australia Pty Ltd. |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|

|   | · | Productos Key Mexicana S. de R.L. de C.V. |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Key Technology (Shanghai) Trading Co. Ltd. |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Key Technology Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|

----
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo20838 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### FORT LAUDERDALE TECHNICAL COLLEGE, INC., etc., Appellant, v. LONG ADVERTISING AGENCY, INC., etc., Appellee.

No. 69-737.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 19, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.