alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Gregory J. Eisenhauer, Chief Financial Officer of ProxyMed, Inc., certify
that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ProxyMed, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: March 30, 2004 /s/ GREGORY J. EISENHAUER, CFA
#### Frank G. DOMBROE, Appellant, v. Carlton E. GREGG, et al., Appellees.

No. 69-262.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 21, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Goller, Appellant, *v.*Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company.

*Negligence*— Railroads—Passenger—Crossing *tracks at station*— “Stop, *look and listen.”*

One who is struck by a moving train, which was plainly visible from the place where it was his duty to stop, look and listen, will be conclusively presumed to have gone into an obvious danger. This rule applies to a passenger who attempts to cross a double-track railroad at a station when he had, before crossing, an unobstructed view in the direction from which the train came for 800 feet and the engine was then within 200 feet of the plank crossing over which he attempted to go.

Argued Oct. 6, 1910.

Appeal, No. 191, Oct. T., 1910, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Somerset Co., May T., 1906, No. 285, on verdict for. defendant in case of Amanda C. Goller v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Trespass to recover damages for death of plaintiff’s husband. Before Kooser, P. J.

At the trial it appeared that plaintiff’s husband was killed on March 14, 1906, on the north track of defendant’s double track railroad in front of its passenger station in the borough of Confluence.

The circumstances of the accident are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

The trial judge gave binding instructions for defendant.

Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.'

*Error assigned*was in giving binding instructions for (defendant.

*J. A. BerTcey,*with him *L. C. Colborn*and *C. L. Shaver,*for appellant.

*413January 3, 1911:

*W. II. Koontz,*with him *J. G.*Ogle, for appellee.

Pee Ctjeiam,

At the station where the accident happened the defendant company had two tracks that extended east and west. The station house was south of the tracks, and a plank walk eight feet wide and twenty-two feet long extended from it across the tracks to a platform on the north side. The deceased bought a ticket twenty-five minutes before the accident and on the approach of the train which was behind time and probably running faster than usual, he walked hurriedly or ran over the plank crossing and was struck by the engine as he was about to step on the platform, on the north side. Before starting across the tracks, he had an unobstructed view in the direction from which the train came for 800 feet and the engine was then within 200 feet of the crossing.

Under these facts shown by the plaintiff’s testimony there is no escape from the conclusion that the deceased either failed to look for the train or saw it and took the chance of crossing in advance of it. The danger was manifest and the rule that one who is struck by a moving train, which was plainly visible from the place where it was his duty to stop, look and listen, will be conclusively presumed to have gone into an obvious danger, applies: Carroll v. Penna. R. R. Co., 12 W. N. C. 348; Myers v. B. & O. R. R. Co., 150 Pa. 386. It follows that it was not error to direct a verdict for the defendant and the judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27947]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration


Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory 
Committee; Notice of Open Meeting

    A meeting of the Transportation and Related Equipment Technical 
Advisory Committee will be held November 7, 1997, 9:00 a.m., at the 
Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 1617M-2, 14th Street between 
Pennsylvania & Constitution Avenues, N.W., Washington, D.C. The 
Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export 
Administration with respect to technical questions which affect the 
level of export controls applicable to transportation and related 
equipment or technology.

Agenda

    1. Opening remarks by the Chairperson.
    2. Navy presentation on Uninhabited Air Vehicle (UAV) development 
and export control implications.
    3. Status of Missile Technology Control Regime.
    4. Update on The Wassenaar Arrangement.
    5. Update on Bureau of Export Administration initiatives.
    6. Election of Chairperson.
    7. Review of List Review proposals offered by members.
    8. Review of action items.
    9. Presentation of papers or comments by the public.
    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of 
seats will be available. To the extent time permits, members of the 
public may present oral statements to the Committee. Written statements 
may be submitted at any time before or after the meeting. However, to 
facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee 
members, the Committee suggests that you forward your public 
presentation materials two weeks prior to the meeting to the following 
address: Ms. Lee Ann Carpenter, OAS/EA/BXA MS: 3886C, U.S. Department 
of Commerce, 14th & Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230.
    For further information or copies of the minutes, please call (202) 
482-2583.

    Dated: October 16, 1997.
Lee Ann Carpenter,
Director, Technical Advisory Committee Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-27947 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.4

                            APPLIEDTHEORY CORPORATION

                  CALCULATION OF LOSS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED) (1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                JUNE 30, 1998
                                                                                -------------
<S>                                                                           <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
       Shares outstanding at beginning of period                                   9,810,000
       Weighted average shares issued during three months
       ended June 30, 1998 (1,230,751 shares)                                      1,162,642
                                                                                -------------
                                                                                  10,972,642
                                                                                =============

Net loss                                                                        $( 2,233,000)
                                                                                =============

Loss per share attributable to common stockholders                              $      (0.20)
                                                                                =============
</TABLE>





(1)  For a discussion of loss per share, see Note B of the Notes to the
     Financial Statements provided in Part I, Item 1 of our Form 10-Q for the
     period ended June 30, 1999.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT January 7, 2011

No. 10-2966

Efrain Hidalgo, Sr., Appellant

v.

Raymond Sobina, et al.

(W.D. Pa. No. 3-08-cv-00138)

Present: BARRY and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges

Motion by Appellant to File Exhibit to Petition for Rehearing.

Respectfully, Stephanie/smw

_________________________________ORDER________________________________ The motion for leave to file an exhibit to the petition for rehearing is granted. The petition for panel rehearing is granted and the Court's order, filed December 3, 2010, is hereby vacated. As Judge Fisher is recused, this appeal will be assigned to a reconstituted panel of the Court.

By the Court,

/s/Maryanne Trump Barry Circuit Judge Dated: February 10, 2011 Smw/cc: Efrain Hidalgo, Sr. Andrea F. McKenna, Esq.

A True Copy :

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE U.S SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sense Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Rule 13a-14(b), that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     By: /s/ Bruce E. Schreiner Bruce E. Schreiner President and Principal Financial Officer Dated October 20, 2008
255 La. 1098

#### Robert B. REED et al. v. CLASSIFIED PARKING SYSTEM, INC. et al.

No. 50474.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 4, 1970.

In re: Classified Parking System, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 232 So.2d 103.

Writ refused. Under the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER  ENDING JUNE 30, 2000,  JUNE 30, 1999 AND FISCAL YEAR
END MARCH  31,  2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001078037
<NAME>                        Remedent USA, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                    $

                                              June 30,
                                               2000
                                              -------
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                APR-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                          14,869
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (3,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    109,643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               214,442
<PP&E>                                          58,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          847,071
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,985
<OTHER-SE>                                    (568,108)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,965
<SALES>                                        200,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,053
<CGS>                                           69,865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  362,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (224,378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (224,378)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (224,378)
<EPS-BASIC>
<EPS-DILUTED>





</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

Cookson Group plc and Subsidiaries

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C Section 1350)



In connection with the
annual report on Form 20-F of Cookson Group plc for the period ended 31 December 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nicholas R Salmon, Chief Executive of Cookson Group plc certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Cookson Group plc.



Date: 9 June 2005



/s/ Nicholas R SalmonNicholas R SalmonChief Executive(Chief Executive Officer)




---

Cookson Group plc and Subsidiaries

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C Section 1350)



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Cookson Group plc for the period ended
31 December 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dennis H Millard, Group Finance Director of Cookson Group plc certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The annual report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Cookson Group plc.



Date: 9 June 2005



/s/ Dennis H MillardDennis H MillardGroup Finance Director(Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 31.2
                                                                    ------------


                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, James K. McHugh, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of N-Viro International
Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated:  April  2,  2007


/s/  James  K.  McHugh
----------------------
James  K.  McHugh
Chief  Financial  Officer
#### Ronald BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-358.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 22, 1970.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Vera Winter Lee, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration and *169appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Mackiewicz v. State, 114 So.2d 684 (Fla.1959).

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 21



Cygne Designs, Inc. and Subsidiaries



Subsidiaries of Cygne Designs, Inc.



|                                                    |  |                                              
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                                          |  | Jurisdiction of Organization or Incorporation
|                                                    | 
|Cygne Guatemala, S.A.                               |  | Guatemala                                    
|                                                    | 
|MBS Internacional, S.A.                             |  | Guatemala                                    
|                                                    | 
|JMB Internacional, S.A.                             |  | Guatemala                                    
|                                                    | 
|M.T.G. I.-Textile Manufacturers Group (Israel) Ltd. |  | Israel                                       
|                                                    | 
|Cygne Group (F. E.) Limited                         |  | Hong Kong                                    
|                                                    | 
|MBS (Cygne) Company                                 |  | Delaware
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

VT 11 Billings Park Trail Safety 

Improvements Trail Facility

National Park Service - 

Marsh Billings Rockefeller 

National Historic Park

Town of 

Woodstock Windsor 2024

VT 12 Grout Pond Road Enhancement Roadway Reconstruction 

& Parking Lot

US Forest Service- Green 

Mountain National Forest

Town of 

Stratton Windham 2024

VT 14 Texas Falls Bridge #7 Bridge 

Replacement Bridge Replacement US Forest Service- Green Mountain National Forest

Town of 

Hancock Addison PE 2023 

CN 2026

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Vermont Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Vermont FLAP are listed below by application number and include:

Vermont Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2023-2026

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The Vermont PDC does not have a firm date for the next Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please bookmark our webpage to watch for 

future Calls for Projects in your state. https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/programs-access

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.