alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 339 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to make permanent the direct hire 

authority of the Secretary of Defense for domestic defense industrial 

base facilities, the Major Range and Test Facilities Base, and the Office 

of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. LANKFORD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to make permanent 

the direct hire authority of the Secretary of Defense 

for domestic defense industrial base facilities, the Major 

Range and Test Facilities Base, and the Office of the 

Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Defense 

5 Improved Hiring Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 339 IS

1 SEC. 2. MAKING PERMANENT THE DIRECT HIRE AUTHOR2 ITY FOR DOMESTIC DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL 

3 BASE FACILITIES, THE MAJOR RANGE AND 

4 TEST FACILITIES BASE, AND THE OFFICE OF 

5 THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONAL TEST AND 

6 EVALUATION. 

7 (a) CODIFICATION OF SECTION 1125 OF FY 2017 

8 NDAA.—Chapter 81 of title 10, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end a new section consisting 

10 of— 

11 (1) a heading as follows: 

12 ‘‘§ 1599j. Direct hire authority for domestic defense 

13 industrial base facilities, the Major 

14 Range and Test Facilities Base, and the 

15 Office of the Director of Operational Test 

16 and Evaluation’’; 

17 and 

18 (2) a text consisting of the text of section 1125 

19 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

20 Year 2017 (10 U.S.C. 1580 note prec.). 

21 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS IN CONNECTION

22 WITH CODIFICATION.—Section 1599j of title 10, United 

23 States Code, as added by subsection (a), is amended— 

24 (1) in subsection (a)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 339 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘During each of fiscal 

2 years 2017 through 2025, the Secretary’’ and 

3 inserting ‘‘The Secretary’’; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘United States Code,’’; and 

5 (2) in subsection (b)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘During fiscal years 2017 

7 through 2021, the Secretary’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘The Secretary’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘United States Code,’’. 

10 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

11 at the beginning of chapter 81 of such title is amended 

12 by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘1599j. Direct hire authority for domestic defense industrial base facilities, the 

Major Range and Test Facilities Base, and the Office of the 

Director of Operational Test and Evaluation.’’. 

13 (d) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 1125 of the Na14 tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (10 

15 U.S.C. 1580 note prec.) is repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

**FORM N-PX**

**ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF**

**DWS Large Company Growth Fund, DWS Capital Growth Fund, DWS Growth & Income Fund,**

**DWS Small Cap Core Fund and DWS S&P 500 Index Fund**

**Each a Series of DWS Investment Trust**

Investment Company Act file number  811-43

DWS Investment Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

John Millette

Secretary

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA  02108-3106

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  617-295-1000

Date of fiscal year end:  07/31

DWS Large Company Growth Fund

Date of fiscal year end:  09/30

DWS Capital Growth Fund

DWS Growth & Income Fund

DWS Small Cap Core 

Date of fiscal year end:  12/31

DWS S&P 500 Index Fund

Date of reporting period:  7/1/07-6/30/08

Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53026-53027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27005]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of International Labor Affairs


U.S. National Administrative Office; National Advisory Committee 
for the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation; Notice of Open 
Meeting by Teleconference

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting by teleconference, October 31, 1997.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 94-
463), the U.S. National Administrative Office (NAO) gives notice of a 
meeting of the National Advisory Committee for the North American 
Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC), which was established by the 
Secretary of Labor.
    The Committee was established to provide advice to the U.S. 
Department of Labor on matters pertaining to the implementation and 
further elaboration of the NAALC, the labor side accord to the North 
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The Committee is authorized 
under Article 17 of the NAALC.
    The Committee consists of 12 independent representatives drawn from 
among labor organizations, business and industry, and educational 
institutions.

DATES: The Committee will meet on October 31, 1997 from 1:00 p.m. to 
3:00 p.m. The meeting will be by teleconference.


[[Page 53027]]


ADDRESSES: U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 
C-5515 (Seminar Room 1A), Washington, DC 20210. The meeting is open to 
the public on a first-come, first served basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irasema Garza, designated Federal Officer, U.S. NAO, U.S. Bureau of 
International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Room C-4327, Washington, DC 20210. Telephone 202-501-6653 
(this is not a toll free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Please refer to the notice published in the 
Federal Register on December 15, 1994 (59 FR 64713) for supplementary 
information.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on October 6, 1997.
Irasema T. Garza,
Secretary, U.S. National Administrative Office.
[FR Doc. 97-27005 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-28-M
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
RFS Hotel Investors, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-03307 and File No.
333-28849) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-19411) of our report dated January 21,
2000, except for Note 9 as to which the date is February 15, 2000, on our audits
of the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule of
RFS Hotel Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and
for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997, which report appears in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Memphis, Tennessee
March 27, 2000
# L_2005037EN.01002101.xml

| 10.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 37/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 37/21

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 63/2005 of 14 January 2004 on the issues of licences for the import of garlic in the quarter from 1 March to 31 May 2005

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 13 of 15 January 2005
  )

On page 20, in Annex II, in the column headed ‘Argentina’, last figure:

for:

‘
  11.4.2005
  ’,

read:

‘
  4.4.2005
  ’.

---
#### Jorge Humberto RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-409.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 24, 1970.

*195Bernard Berman, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden Siegendorf and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged in a three-count information with several narcotics violations. He pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity and waived jury trial. Thereafter, the trial court found the appellant to be insane and incompetent to stand trial, pursuant to § 917.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Subsequently, what was purported to be an incompetency proceeding came on to be heard before the trial court, the result of which was that the appellant was convicted of two counts contained in the information and sentenced accordingly. This appeal ensued and the appellant has preserved several points for review.

The only one we deem pertinent is that the trial court erred in failing to enter a formal adjudication of competency, pursuant to § 917.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., prior to proceeding with the trial of the cause. The State concedes that no such order was entered. We therefore reverse the adjudication of guilty under the two counts as charged in the information, vacate the sentences thereon, and return the matter to the trial court for an appropriate order as to the appellant’s competency and thereafter for further proceedings as the trial judge shall direct.

The record reveals that the appellant was adjudicated in direct contempt and sentenced accordingly for acts which occurred in the presence of the court, subsequent to the pronouncement of guilt. In making a determination of the validity of this contempt order and sentence, the date the trial court ultimately determines to be the date of competency of the appellant becomes essential. If said order [nunc pro tunc] determines the competency prior to the incident, the adjudication of contempt and sentence should stand. If the appellant is determined to he competent at a time subsequent to the incident which gave rise to the contempt, then obviously he could not be guilty of contempt and the trial judge should be so governed.

Reversed and remanded, with directions for further proceedings in the trial court not inconsistent with this opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          96,357
<SECURITIES>                                    20,078
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (319)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,180
<PP&E>                                          10,630
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,088)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,872
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,036
<SALES>                                         13,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,281
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   192
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (16,551)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,010)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,010)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)


</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-82982, 33-97024, 333-25769, 333-49497,
333-59245, 333-50874, 333-108109, 333-111464) and Form S-8 (File Nos.
33-69516, 33-69518, 33-84706, 333-50874, 33-88030, 33-92998, 333-04535,
333-29059, 333-29977, 333-34119, 333-38490, 333-38494, 333-56747, 333-56749,
333-80623, 333-91468, 333-91470, 333-106066) of GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc. of
our reports dated March 4, 2004 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule which appear in this Form 10-K. We also consent
to the reference to us under the heading "Selected Financial Data" in this
Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 8, 2004
#### Ruby REED, individually, and Silas Reed, her husband, Appellants, v. HOPPERS FAMILY SHOE STORES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-348.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 13, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 17, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Appendix 5. Pesticides
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2405

ERNEST G. PORTERFIELD; ALICE PORTERFIELD THORN; WILLARD R. MEADOWS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versusROBERT F. HODGES, Lawyer for Mary Mood Northern, Incorporated; BRIAN SCHEID, Lawyer forMary Moody Northern, Incorporated; THE HONORABLE J. COLIN CAMPBELL; THE HONORABLE HARRY L. CARRICO, Chief Justice, State Supreme Court, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (MISC-97-49) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ernest G. Porterfield, Alice Porterfield Thorn, Willard R. Meadows, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's orders dismissing their action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp. 1998), and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Porterfield v. Hodges , No. MISC97-49 (W.D. Va. Oct. 6, 1997). See 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Leila Thompson BLISS, Petitioner, v. James H. KINSEY, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 39711.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 25, 1970.

Rehearing Denied July 17, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 233 So.2d 191.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1000


<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                                  8775
<SECURITIES>                                                           25164
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           6060
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             238
<INVENTORY>                                                              749
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       41706
<PP&E>                                                                  4921
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          2936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         50173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   8533
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                                  19
<OTHER-SE>                                                             41190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           50173
<SALES>                                                                22866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       22866
<CGS>                                                                   2842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           6127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       15209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           3
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         2243
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            2106
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0.11



</TABLE>
#### Mrs. Rose MICHELIN v. The KROGER CO. and Jimmy L. Long.

No. 45842.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 25, 1970.

Reeharing Denied July 2, 1970.

Harmon W. Broom, Jackson, for appellant.

Daniel, Coker, Horton & Bell, John M. Roach, Jackson, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26228]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4494-000]


PacificCorp; Notice of Filing

September 29, 1997.
    Take notice that PacifiCorp on September 4, 1997, tendered for 
filing a Notice of Termination of Service Agreement No. 6 to 
PacifiCorp's FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 5.
    Copies of this filing were supplied to the City of Anaheim, the 
Washington, Utilities and Transportation Commission and the Public 
Utility Commission of Oregon.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before October 10, 1997. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26228 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Dreman Value Income Edge Fund, Inc., on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| May 29, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark                    |
|--------------|----------------------------------------|
|         | Michael G. Clark                       |
|         | President                              |
|         | DWS Dreman Value Income Edge Fund, Inc |

 

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Dreman Value Income Edge Fund, Inc., on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| May 29, 2009 | /s/Paul Schubert                        |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------|
|         | Paul Schubert                           |
|         | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   |
|         | DWS Dreman Value Income Edge Fund, Inc. |