alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL AP PEALS OF TENNES SEE AT NAS HVILLE O ct obe r 7, 200 8 S es sio n

STATE OF TENNESS EE v . CURTIS LE E MAJO RS

Appeal f rom the Cr im inal Cou rt for Davidson Coun ty No. 2006-D- 3084 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Ju dge

No. M2007- 01911-CCA -R3-C D - F iled May 21, 2009

J A M ES C UR WO OD W I TT , J R ., J
., d i s s en t i n g.

Re sp e c tf ull y , I dis se nt f ro m th e ma

jor ity vi ew th at th e e vid e nc e wa s su ff ic ie nt t o support the conviction of tampering with e vidence

. The evidenc e did not establish the def endant’ s g uilt of this offense be y ond a re asonable doubt.

The State is oblige d to e stablish the fac tual prese nce of the elements of the offe nse. Although such may be acc omplished pur ely throug h the use of c ircumstantial evidenc e, Duchac v. Sta te , 505 S.W .2d 237 (Tenn. 1973)
, as wa s t h e case now bef ore us, the f

acts a nd circ umstances “must be so strong and cog ent as to exclude ever y other re asonable hy

pothesis save the guilt of the defe ndant,” Sta tev . Crawf or d
, 47 0 S.W. 2d 61 0, 61 2 (T e nn

. 19 71 ). “ In o the r w or ds , ‘ [a] w e b o f guil t must be woven ar o u nd the def endant f rom which he cannot e scape and fr om which fa cts and circ umstances the jur

y could dra

w no other r easona

ble infer ence save the g uilt o f t he def endant beyond a re asonable doubt.’” State v. Mc Afee , 737 S.W .2d 304, 306 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987) (q u o t i n g Cra wfo rd , 470 S.W .2d at 613).

The re asonable doubt standard is rather rig orous by desig n and by fu nction of principles of due proce ss of law. Se e J ac k so n v . V irg ini a , 4 4 3 U. S . 307, 324, 99 S. Ct . 2781, 2791-92 (1979) . The burde n is not met whe n the finder of fac t must specula te as to the pre sence of all fac tual elements of the conviction offe nse. See
, e.g. , State v Gloria A. Porter , No. W2004-02464-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App., Jackson, Sept. 21, 2005). In the prese nt case , one may well spec ulate that the de fenda nt was “up to something” when the of fice rs enter ed the r esidenc e, but it is n o t me r e ly a s ur r e n d e r to n a iv e te to e xp e c t th a t th e p r o s e c u ti o n mu s t a c tu a lly prove circ umstances upon whic h g uilt may be sing ularly

inferr ed.

To illustrate my

conclusion that the State fa iled to do t h is in the present c ase, I considere d what would have been the result h ad the def endant be en prose cuted f or misdemeanor-2-

possession of coc aine ba sed circ umstantially upon flushing suc h coca ine down the toilet. The mind easily rec oils ag ainst the proposition that the defe ndant’s flushingactivity could have resulted in a

c onvic tio n o f e ve n a

min ima l dr

ug -p os se ssi on

off e ns e , a nd y e t, t he ins tant o ff

e ns e is e xac tly

that; it is predicated upon the possession or control of a “thing ” or “ evidenc e.”

I n conclusion, I

would have he ld that the evidenc e wa s insufficient to support the conviction of tampe ringwith evidence

.

___________________________________ J AMES CURW OOD WI TT, J R., J UDGE
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lucille JOHNSON.

No. 61633.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 1978.

L. Howard McCurdy, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission to OMB for Review; Comment Request

October 9, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1222.
    Form Number: IRS Forms 8628, 8635 and 9383.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Order Blank for Federal Income Tax Forms for ``Plan Only'' 
Accounts (8628); BPOL Order Blank for Federal Income Tax Forms (8635); 
and Fax Order Blank for BPOL Reorders (9383).
    Description: These forms allow banks, post offices and libraries to 
distribute tax forms and publications to taxpayers at convenient 
locations. Participation is on a voluntary basis and done as a public 
service for the Internal Revenue Service.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Not-for-profit 
institutions, Federal Government, State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 63,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Time per 
                            Form                               response 
                                                              (minutes) 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8628.......................................................       3     
8635.......................................................       6     
9383.......................................................       6     
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 5,450 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-27767 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ray T. WOODALL, Jr.

No. 62044.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Ray T. Woodall, Jr., applying for writ of review. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted. Motion for new trial remanded for hearing. La.C.Cr.P. arts. 851(3), 853.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., dissent.
# Intro

# Simple Before-After

# Comparison Group Before-After

# Empirical Bayes Before-After

# Sample Size

# image1.png
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
#### Samuel T. SAPIRO, Appellant, v. Leonard L. LEVENSTEIN, Appellee.

No. 71-1244.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 11, 1973.

Nicholson, Howard, Brawner & Lovett," Miami, for appellant.

Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Proenza & Richman, and Alan Greer, McCarthy, Steel, Hector & Davis, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on July 25, 1972 (266 So.2d 40) reversing the final judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed June 20, 1973 (279 So.2d 858) and mandate now lodged in this- court, quashed this court’s judgment with directions to reinstate the judgment of the circuit court;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore entered in this court on September 18, 1972 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed July 25, 1972 is vacated, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the judgment of the circuit court herein appealed from is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 24, 2015

No. 04-15-00576-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.B.ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-PA-00411

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant Miguel Angel Reyes' motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal is 

hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



In connection with the Annual Report of Rural/Metro Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack E. Brucker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Dated: September 27, 2004            
|                                     
|/s/ Jack E. Brucker                  
|Jack E. Brucker                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

(Figure 14

the following:

• 

• 

• 

• Death/serious injury is unacceptable: • Humans make mistakes/humans are vulnerable: • Responsibility is shared:

This Case Study is part of the Safe System Approach for Speed Management Report: Click here to read the full report here.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

• Safety is proactive: 

• Redundancy is crucial: 

is reducing vehicular travel 

• Street design: 

, • Signal timing: 

• City Municipal Code: 

to lower the default

• Urban Villages: 

• Speed limit policy: 

. 

.

.

.

.

.

. 

.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

• 

Table 9.

 www.seattle.

.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

Greenwood/ 

Phinney Ave N corridor

NW/N 85th St

corridor

N/NE 45th St

corridor

Green Lake/ 

Roosevelt 

Urban Village

U-District 

Urban Center

.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

Table 10:

Greenwood/ 

Phinney Ave N

NW/N 85th St

N/NE 45th St

Green Lake/ 

Roosevelt Urban 

Village

U-District Urban 

Center

OVERALL -22% -18% -10% -7% -54%

.

.
#### Jimmie Lee WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-664.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 31, 1970.

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks reversal of a conviction for breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit petit larceny and commission of an assault, grounding his appeal on a contention that reversible error resulted from a reference in the testimony of a police officer to the victim having identified the defendant from mug shots.

In Jones v. State, Fla.App.1967, 194 So. 2d 24, this court reversed a judgment of conviction because the prosecutor in his opening statement to the jury in referring to the defendant having been identified from a photograph, said that a photograph of the defendant had been mixed “with a bunch, a whole bunch of others, let’s say ten or twelve other mug shots.” There we expressed the view that the reference to mug shots was harmful error in that it had the effect of informing the jury that the defendant had committed other crimes or been in trouble with the police.

However, on consideration of the record of the trial proceedings in this case, we agree with the contention of the state that the error represented by the reference to mug shots did not constitute harmful error and did not result in a miscarriage of justice. In our view the defendant’s substantial rights were not injuriously affected thereby, in the circumstances of this case. The trial court sustained an objection to the testimony, and denied defendant’s motion for mistrial, which latter ruling is assigned as error. The reference to mug shots in this case did not constitute reversible error, because the record discloses that by direct evidence the guilt of the accused was established conclusively if not overwhelmingly, including positive in-court identification of the defendant by the victim and by police officers who apprehended him at the scene, and because of the further circumstance that the testimony of an officer relating to identification of the de*429fendant by photograph, in the course of which the reference was made to mug shots, represented cumulative evidence. See Monroe v. State, Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 209; Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of International Fuel Technology Inc. (“IFT”), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of IFT on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of IFT. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to IFT and will be retained by IFT and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| By:    | /s/ JONATHAN R. BURST         | Date:   | July 23, 2004 |
|--------|-------------------------------|-------------------|---------------|
|   |                               |              |          |
|   | **Jonathan   R. Burst**       |              |          |
|   | **Chief   Executive Officer** |              |          |

16
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Technest Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company do hereby certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Shekhar Wadekar/s/  Bruce WarwickShekhar Wadekar
Chief Executive OfficerBruce Warwick
Principal Financial OfficerDate: November 21, 2011Date: November 21, 2011
'p c L^^^ lapC - lo (/^^ 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Kerrie Kuiper [fdconvention@frontiernet.net] 

Friday, November 11, 2011 9:12 AM 

EAS (OST) 

Letter of support for the Fort Dodge, lA Regional Airport 

::r-.hhV;tN! Or 

-MSPORWION 

;:-ET OFERATiONS 

i! !,'ni HOV! 1 |L| P Li: OM 

FOR T DODG E CONVENTIO N AN D 

VISITOR S BUREA U 

...W E LOV E COMPAN Y 

November 10, 2011 

Dear DOT/Essential Air Support, 

The Fort Dodge Convention and Visitors Bureau recognizes the important role the Fort Dodge 

Regional Airport provides to residents, businesses and visitors in ouwegion. The economic impact of 

our airport is approximately $32 million dollar annually to the community and region. 

We would also like to show our support for the Federal Essential Air Service Program. It is critical to 

our businesses that we have air service to connect our region to markets both nationally and 

internationally. 

The Fort Dodge Regional Airport is currently experiencing growth and success in our community. 

Commercial and private air service into this airport has increased substantially in the past two years. 

In 2010 boardings increased 50% over 2009 and in 2011 boarding have already increased 43% of 

2010. 

The Fort Dodge Convention and Visitors Bureau also supports the Great Lakes Airline proposal for air 

service. This proposal is most similar to the services that Delta was providing and would allow the 

airport to continue its growth in increasing its numbers of enplanements. 

Great Lake's proposal will continue provide many services that encourage our residents to utilize this 

air service. Customers want the aii^rmeg'oing direct to^inneapolis with no stops in Mason.City." • 

They also want a departure and arrival schedule hot departing too early or arriving verj Urt«i *It is 

proposed that there will be three daily flights. Also being qg|«iiected with Delta's global system will 

allow our businesses national and worldwide connectivity. 

Our customers will be able to experience more convenience in their air travel experience with Great 

Lakes. The flights will Depart/Arrive on Concourse E which is the middle of the Minneapolis 

terminal instead of using the A & B Concourse. Customers are still being able to book their tickets 

out of Fort Dodge on Delta.com and tickets booked now out of Fort Dodge will be honored after the 

change of airline occurs. The Delta Sky Miles frequent flyer program will still apply to Fort Dodge 

flights. The "in the air" time will be the same with Great Lakes using the Beech 1900 aircraft as it is 

when Delta flies the SAAB 340 into Fort Dodge today. Most importantly Great Lakes will allow our 

customers to continue to fly out of Fort Dodge safely and conveniently. 

Sincerely,
# L_2005252DE.01002701.xml

| 28.9.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 252/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 252/27

---

Berichtigung der Änderung der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Gemeinschaften

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 203 vom 4. August 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 203 vom 4. August 2005

Seite 20, Nummer 5 betreffend Artikel 104 § 3 Unterabsatz 1 Zeile 3:

anstatt:

„... abgeleitet werden, so kann der Gerichtshof nach Anhörung des ACTanwalts jederzeit durch ...“

muss es heißen:

„... abgeleitet werden, so kann der Gerichtshof nach Anhörung des Generalanwalts jederzeit durch ...“;

Seite 20, Nummer 5 betreffend Artikel 104 § 3 Unterabsatz 2 Zeile 2:

anstatt:

„... der Satzung bezeichneten Beteiligten Gelegenheit zur Äußerung gegeben und den ACTanwalt angehört ...“

muss es heißen:

„... der Satzung bezeichneten Beteiligten Gelegenheit zur Äußerung gegeben und den Generalanwalt angehört ...“.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3448 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3448

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four

                                 An Act

 
  To reauthorize the Director of the United States Holocaust Memorial 
 Museum to support Holocaust education programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Never Again Education 
Reauthorization Act of 2023''.
SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.
    Section 4(a) of the Never Again Education Act (Public Law 116-141; 
134 Stat. 638) is amended by striking ``each of the 4 succeeding fiscal 
years'' and inserting ``each succeeding fiscal year through fiscal year 
2030''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title:    Emerging Communication Technologies (ECT) phase 2 final    report [electronic resource] 
 
SuDocs Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> NAS 1.15:2004-211522/V.1-3
Item    Number: 0830-D    (online)
GPO    System Number: 0000866856
 
 
Volume  1.
Volume  2.
Volume  3. 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  May 21, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|