T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DE NY AR I AN T O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 70863 A ge nc yN o. A 088- 319- 723 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r15, 2013 ** B efo re: F IS H E R , G O U L D , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D e nyA r i ant o, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s ( “ I J ” ) d e c i s i o n d e n y i n g h i s ap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and p rot ec t i on un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture 

# FI LED OC T 21 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 70863 2 (“ C A T ”) . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i al e v id e n c e th e a g e n c y ’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s . W

akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1049, 1056 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o c la im s o f du e p r o c e s s v io la tio n s . Zet i no v. H older , 6 2 2 F . 3 d1 0 0 7 , 1 0 1 1 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 1 0 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. A r i ant o doe s notc ha l l e nge the B I A ’ s di s pos i t i ve f i ndi ng tha thi s a s y l um appl i c a t i on i s t i m e - barr e d. A r i ant o, an e thni c C hi ne s e I ndone s i an, r e c ount e d s e ve r a l i nc i de nt s of m is tr e a tm e n t in I n d o n e s ia , in c lu d in g r o b b e r ie s an da s s au lts , b u t te s tif ie dth a t h e d id notne e d m e di c a l a tt e nt i on f orhi s i nj ur i e s and di d notknow of anyr e a s on tha the w oul d be t ar ge t e d othe rthan hi s appe ar anc e a s an e thni c C hi ne s e pe r s on. A s to w ith h o ld in g o f r em o v al, sub stan ti al ev id en ce su p p o rts th e B IA ’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t A r ian to f a ile dto e s tab lis h p a s t p e r s e c u tio n b e c au s e h is e x p e r ie n c e s , e v e n c u m u la tiv e ly , d idn o t r is e to th e le v e l o f p e r s e c u tio n . See i d. at 10 59 -60 (tw o b eat i ng s and robb er i es and b ei ng ac cost ed by a host i l e m ob ); N ag ou lko , v . I

NS , 333 F . 3d 1012, 1016- 18 ( 9th C i r . 2003) ( di s c r i m i na t i on, h ar as sm en t, an dp h ys ical ab u se o f in su ff icien t sev er ity) . W e r ejec t A rian to ’s c ont e nt i on tha tthe I J ’ s ana l y s i s of pa s tpe r s e c ut i on w a s i m pr ope rbe c aus e the B IA ’s an alys is w as su ff icien t. W e a lso re

ject h is co n ten ti o n th at th e B IA ’s an a ly s is w a s in c o m p le te . See La ta v . I NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000)12- 70863 3 ( r e qui r i ng e rr ort o pr e va i l on adue pr oc e s s c ha l l e nge ) . F urthe r , gi ve n our c o n c lu s io n , w e n e e dn o t r e a c h A r ian to ’s a d d itio n a l n e x u s c o n te n tio n s . F in a lly , h is c o n te n tio n s r e g ar d in g th e p r e s u m p tio n o f f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n n e c e s s ar ilyf a il. See N ag ou lko , 333 F . 3d a t1018. S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e a ls o s up p o rts th e B I A ’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t A r ian to f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h al i ke l i hood of pe r s e c ut i on be c aus e , e ve n unde rdi s f a vor e d gr oup an a ly s is , h e d idn o t d e m o n s tr a te s u f f ic ie n t in d iv idu a liz e dr is k . See H al i m v. H older , 590 F . 3d 971, 979 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( pe t i t i one rf a i l e d t o s how l i ke l i hood of in d iv idu a l tar g e tin g w h e r e h e “f a ile dto o f

f e ran ye v id e n c e th a t d is tin g u is h e s h is e x p o s u r e f

r o m th o s e o f

a ll o th e re th n ic C h in e s e I n d o n e s ian s ” ) ; W a kka ry , 558 F . 3d at10 66 (“ [a ] n app l i cantfor w i thh ol di ng of re m ov alw i l l need t o add uce a c o n s id e r ab lylar g e rq u an tu m o f in d iv idu a liz e d - r is ke v id e n c e to p r e v a il th an w o u ld an as ylum appl i cant ”) . F i nal l y, subst ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the B IA ’ s deni alof C A T re l i ef because A ri ant o fai l ed t o est abl i sh i ti s m ore l i kel y than n othe w ou l d b e t ortured b yo rw ith th e a c q u ie s c e n c e o f th e g o v e rn m e n t if

r e tu rn e dto I n d o n e s ia . See W a kka ry , 55 8 F . 3d at10 67 -68. W e r ej ec tA ri ant o’ s c on t ent i on s thatthe agency fa i l ed t o p roperl y e val uat e the evi dence. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.