alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BARRETT v. STERRETT OPERATING SERVICE, Inc.

No. 6645.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Argued Oct. 13, 1936.

Decided Nov. 16, 1936.

William A. Gallagher, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Norman E. Sill, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, GRONER, and STEPHENS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

There is a rule of the Municipal Court which provides:

“Any party entitled to a jury trial and desiring» same shall file a demand for such jury trial, signed by the party or his attorney of record.

“In Class B * * * cases * * * not later than the time for appearance of the defendant stated in the summons.”

This is a Class B case. On July 23, the return day of the summons, the plaintiff appeared before the court at 10 a. m., which was the hour named in the summons, and moved for a continuance to August 15. A few minutes thereafter counsel for defendant appeared and filed pleas to the declaration and a demand for jury trial. Later plaintiff moved to strike the pleas and the demand for a jury trial. The court overruled the motion to strike the pleas, but sustained the motion to strike the demand for a jury trial. Subsequently the court entered judgment for the plaintiff on the merits. A motion for a new trial was overruled. The only question presented here is whether or not the trial court erred in denying defendant a jury trial.

Assuming the rule to be valid, as we do on this appeal, we nevertheless feel that it is going entirely too far to hold that the rule is so far mandatory that the court is without discretion, for good and sufficient reasons, to modify it when a modification will not result in unreasonable delay or prejudice the rights of the opposite party. Here, as we have seen, the Issues were not made up, nor was the case ready for trial prior to the time when the demand for jury trial was made; and it is perfectly clear that the granting of the motion for jury trial would not have interfered with the orderly disposition of the court’s docket or have deprived the opposing litigant of any rights.

In these circumstances it was an abuse of discretion to deny the application. The correct rule is well stated by the Supreme Court of Texas in Petri v. Bank, 84 Tex. 153, 19 S.W. 379, where it is said that the failure to pay the jury fee upon the first day of the term, in accordance with a rule of court, does not deprive a party of the right of trial by jury unless to grant the right would operate to the prejudice of his adversary. See, also, Blair v. Paggi, et al. (Tex.Com.App.) 238 S.W. 639; Hall v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 65 Iowa, 258, 21 N.W. 596. For these reasons we think the judgment below should be set aside and a new trial awarded the defendant.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 169 (Friday, August 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53816-53817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21240]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8446]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Van Gogh Repetitions''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et

[[Page 53817]]

seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation 
of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and, as appropriate, 
Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003, I hereby determine 
that the objects to be included in the exhibition ``Van Gogh 
Repetitions,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
The Phillips Collection, Washington, DC, from on or about October 12, 
2013, until on or about January 26, 2014, the Cleveland Museum of Art, 
Cleveland, Ohio, from on or about March 2, 2014, until on or about May 
26, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 26, 2013.
Lee Satterfield,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-21240 Filed 8-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
                                                JURISDICTION OF
          NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                     INCORPORATION
          ------------------                    ---------------
<S>                                             <C>
          Dal-Tile Group Inc.                     Delaware
          Dal-Tile Corporation                    Pennsylvania
          R&M Supplies, Inc.                      Delaware
          Tileways, Inc.                          Delaware
          DTM/CM Holdings, Inc.                   Delaware
          Dal-Minerals Company                    Delaware
          Dal-Tile of Canada Inc.                 Ontario
          Materials Ceramicos, S.A. de C.V.       Mexico
          Dal-Tile Mexico, S.A. de C.V.           Mexico
</TABLE>
#### CURTIS ROBINSON EXCAVATING, employer, and the Hartford Insurance Group, Workmen’s Compensation Insurance Carrier, Petitioners, v. Felix OLMOS, employee, and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 44331.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 16, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 206 (Monday, October 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 65284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27185]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Public Notice for Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance; 
Airport Property at Palmer Municipal Airport, Palmer, Alaska

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with repect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given per 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(1)(A) that the 
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a proposal to 
change approximately 9.1 acres of airport land from aeronautical use to 
non-aeronautical use and to authorize the sale of this airport 
property.
    As described in the 2011 approved Airport Layout Plan, the 9.1 
acres of airport land are composed of Tract C Lots LL 2 and LL 3, and 
Tract D Lot LL 1C. Precently these properties are occupied as follows: 
LL 2 Mat-Su Borough Nutrition Center, LL 3 Baseball Fields, and LL 1C 
City Water Well.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 25, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this document to Mike Edelmann, Aviation 
Planner, Federal Aviation Administration, Alaskan Region Airports 
Division, 222 W. 7th Avenue, #14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587. In 
addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be mailed 
or delivered to: City of Palmer Alaska POC Jeffrey Combs Airport 
Superintendent (907) 761-1334 JJCOMBS@palmerak.org 231 West Evergreen, 
Palmer AK 99645.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael Edelmann, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Alaskan Region Airports Division, 222 W. 7th Avenue, 
#14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587, telephone 907-271-5026, email 
mike.edelmann@faa.gov or Jeffrey Combs Airport Superintendent (907) 
761-1334, JJCOMBS@palmerak.org, 231 West Evergreen, Palmer AK 99645.

    Issued in Anchorage, Alaska, on October 20, 2015.
Byron Huffman,
Division Manager, FAA, Alaskan Region.
[FR Doc. 2015-27185 Filed 10-23-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017226EN.01003101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 226/31 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 3 of 5 January 2005](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2005_003_R_TOC)
)

On page 1, footnote 1:

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | Opinion delivered on 30 March 2004 (not yet published in the Official Journal).’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | Opinion delivered on 30 March 2004 ([OJ C 103E, 29.4.2004, p. 412](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2004_103_E_TOC)).’. |

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33481]


Marksman Corporation; Lease and Operation Exemption; J.K. Line, 
Inc.

    Marksman Corporation (Marksman), a noncarrier, has filed a verified 
notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to lease from J.K. Line, Inc., 
and to operate 17 miles of rail line in the State of Indiana from 
milepost 183, near Monterey, to milepost 199, near North Judson.
    This transaction is related to the notice of exemption filed in STB 
Finance Docket No. 33483, The Toledo, Peoria and Western Railroad 
Corporation-Continuance in Control Exemption-Marksman Corporation, for 
The Toledo, Peoria and Western Railroad Corporation to continue in 
control of Marksman (once it becomes a carrier through consummation of 
the transaction in STB Finance Docket No. 33481), in addition to its 
indirect control of Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway Corporation (TPW 
Railway). <SUP>1</SUP> Because the exemption in STB Finance Docket No. 
33483 is not scheduled to become effective until October 14, 1997, the 
earliest the transaction in STB Finance Docket No. 33481 can be 
consummated is October 14, 1997.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Marksman owns 100% of the stock of TPW Railway.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33481, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Eric M. Hocky, Esq., Gollatz, Griffin & Ewing, P.C., 213 West 
Miner Street, P.O. Box 796, West Chester, PA 19381-0796.

    Decided: October 8, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27485 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
House Calendar No. 1

105TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 105–1

IN THE MATTER OF REPRESENTATIVE NEWT GINGRICH--

pages 201 to 300
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of iParty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 25, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 9,  2004 |
|-------------------------|
|                    | /s/ PATRICK  FARRELL |   |
|                    | Patrick Farrell |
|                    | President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of RPM Advantage.
(the "Registrant") for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David R. Pressler, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:   July 15, 2011


By:

/s/ DAVID R. PRESSLER


David R. Pressler
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Exhibit 31.1
                           Section 302 Certifications

I, Alan Margerison, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)];
and

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and

   d) disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  August 10, 2004                 /s/ Alan Margerison
                                       -------------------
                                       Alan Margerison
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.1

Summary of Memorandum of Understanding/Settlement by and between BRC Group, LLC and
Quepasa Corporation, dated as of September 22, 2009

On the 22nd day of September 2009, following mediation held on the same date in the case then pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California entitled BRC Group, LLC (BRC) v. Quepasa Corporation (the Company) (Case No. CV 09-1506) (the Action), the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding/Settlement (the Agreement) with BRC outlining the terms pursuant to which the parties agreed to settle the Action, to wit: (a) the Company agrees to reduce the outstanding indebtedness of BRC to the Company from $350,000 to $250,000, which indebtedness shall be evidenced by a Promissory Note (the Note) in such amount, dated September 22, 2009, executed by BRC in favor of the Company, with a repayment term of eighteen (18) months.  Interest shall accrue on the Note commencing on February 1, 2011 at the rate of four percent (4%) per annum (provided that if any note due to a BRC insider shall bear interest at a higher rate, such higher rate shall also apply to the Note), and BRC shall commence making monthly payments on June 1, 2011.  The Note shall be secured by the issuance of a warrant by BRC in favor of the Company which shall permit the Company to receive up to a thirty percent (30%) membership interest in BRC should BRC default under any of the terms of the Note.  Should BRC default under any term of the Note, and not cure such default within the thirty (30) day period immediately following the date of the default (the Cure Period), the Company may exercise such portion of the warrant and purchase such units of membership interest in BRC which would be equivalent in value to the unpaid amount due to the Company.  The Company shall not be required to issue a notice of default to BRC.  BRC shall then have ninety (90) days from the last day of the Cure Period to repurchase any membership interest in BRC acquired by the Company for consideration payable to the Company equal to the amount of principal and interest due under the Note to the date of repurchase; (b) any and all agreements entered into by and between the Company and BRC prior to September 22, 2009 shall be terminated; (c) BRC and the Company shall execute Mutual General Releases as of September 22, 2009 of all matters in the Action including waivers of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code; and (d) the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall be more fully described in a Settlement Agreement, Note and Warrant and Release of Claims to be signed by BRC and the Company.  In the event that no such Settlement Agreement, Note or Warrant is signed by the parties, the Agreement shall serve as a valid and enforceable contract.
EXHIBIT 21

                       Subsidiaries of Cygne Designs, Inc.

                                                    Jurisdiction of Organization
           Subsidiary                                  or Incorporation
           ----------                                  ----------------

Sportswear International (USA), Inc.                Delaware

CTB Limited                                         British Virgin Islands

Cygne Guatemala, S.A.                               Guatemala

JMB Internacional, S.A.                             Guatemala

C.M. Israel Sewing Houses Ltd.                      Israel

M.T.G.I. - Textile Manufacturers Group
  (Israel) Limited                                  Israel

Cygne Sourcing Co., S.r.l.                          Italy

Wear & Co. S.r.l.                                   Italy

AC Services, Inc.                                   Delaware

MBS Company, Inc.                                   Delaware

Cygne Group (F.E.) Limited                          Hong Kong

Fenn, Wright and Manson Incorporated                New York

HKN (US) Inc.                                       New York

T. Wear Company S.r.l.                              Italy

Tralee, S.A.                                        Uruguay
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 146 (Monday, July 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 44671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18443]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

Notice of Availability of the Proposed Notice of Sale for Outer 
Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Lease Sale 229 in the Western 
Planning Area (WPA) in the Gulf of Mexico; Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Interior.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management published a notice that 
appeared for Public Inspection on July 23, 2012 and published in the 
Federal Register July 24, 2012. It contained a typographical mistake. 
This document corrects the error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Dixon, Leasing Division Chief, 
Donna.Dixon@boem.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2012-No. 142, published July 24, 
2012, at 77 FR 43355, there was a typographical error. The second 
sentence of the SUMMARY section is corrected to read: ``This sale will 
be the first under the Proposed Final OCS Oil and Gas Leasing Program 
for 2012-2017.'' All other portions of the Notice remain unchanged.

    Dated: July 24, 2012.
Tommy P. Beaudreau,
 Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
[FR Doc. 2012-18443 Filed 7-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```