alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sammy L. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-998.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 26, 1970.

Paul Pollack, Miami, and Neale J. Poll-er, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Goswick v. State, Fla.1962, 143 So.2d 817; Howard v. State, 78 Fla. 388, 83 So. 87.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3677 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3677

    To permanently authorize the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2024

Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Grassley) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To permanently authorize the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORIZATION OF UNDETECTABLE FIREARMS ACT OF 
              1988.

    Section 2(f) of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 (18 U.S.C. 
922 note; Public Law 100-649) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Effective Date and Sunset Provision'' and 
        all that follows through ``This Act and the amendments'' and 
        inserting the following: ``Effective Date.--This Act and the 
        amendments''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (2).
                                 <all>
```
#### Ralph E. HORTON, Sr., Appellant, v. Teresa A. OWEN, Appellee.

No. 69-431.

District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District.

Sept. 22, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

I, Scott C. Hennessy, as President and Chief Executive Officer of True Temper Sports, Inc. (the "Company"), state and certify that this
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/SCOTT C. HENNESSYScott C. Hennessy President and Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)May 13, 2008 |  |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, Larry Redfern, Acting Chief Financial Officer of Computer Motion, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d));
and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 12, 2003                       COMPUTER MOTION, INC.


                                         By: /s/ Larry Redfern
                                         Larry Redfern
                                         Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 12.1

                       PDV AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                Year Ended December 31
                                      _________________________________________________________________________
                                         1997            1996            1995           1994            1993
                                         ----            ----            ----           ----            ----
<S>                                    <C>             <C>             <C>            <C>              <C>
Income before provision for
     income taxes                      $334,185        $215,781        $226,482       $332,940         $252,373

Equity earnings (less than) in
     excess of distributions            (33,506)         (8,672)        (19,090)       (14,991)         (11,828)

Equity in losses of certain
     investees                            2,614           5,245           5,187             68              183

Interest                                209,465         194,362         186,546        157,575          136,857

Amortization of previously
     capitalized interest                 4,115           3,600           3,440          3,039            2,433

Portion of rent representative of
     interest factor                     13,000          11,000          10,928         11,305           11,173
                                       --------        --------        --------       --------         --------
Total earnings                         $529,873        $421,316        $413,493       $479,936         $391,191
                                       ========        ========        ========       ========         ========
Fixed charges

Interest expense                       $209,465        $194,362        $186,546       $157,575         $136,857

Capitalized interest                      7,800          12,000           5,000         12,000            4,000

Portion of rent representative of
     interest factor
                                         13,000          11,000          10,928         11,305           11,173
                                       --------        --------        --------       --------         --------
Total fixed charges                    $230,265        $217,362        $202,474       $180,880         $152,030
                                       ========        ========        ========       ========         ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed
     charges                              2.30x           1.94x           2.04x          2.65x            2.57x
</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-06-338-CR

COURTNEY RENEE FOWLER	          					APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the appellant’s “Motion To Withdraw Notice Of And Dismiss Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 							 												

										PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 25, 2007
#### Bettye BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-343.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 05-2246 JOSE QUINONES, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. HOUSER BUICK, Defendant, Appellee.
ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on February 2, 2006 is amended as follows: Cover sheet: Insert [Hon. Kenneth P. Neiman, U.S. Magistrate Judge] and delete [Hon. Michael A. Ponsor, U.S. District Judge]
Mail Envelope Properties (4628F324.F8C: 4: 12192) Subject: Creation Date: From:
Created By: Recipients

GWIA.MDEDOM Baltimorel Cecil County 8hr Ozone State Implementation Plans 4/20/07 1:06PM Brian Hug bhug@mde.state.md.us

"ali.mirzakhalili@state.de.us" (ali.mirza "cripps.christopher@epa.gov" (cripps.chri "kotsch.martin@epa.gov" (kotsch.martin@ep baltometro.org> <stomlinson «stomlinson@baltometro.org» dc.gov> <rama. tangirala «rama.tangirala@dc.gov» dep.state.nj.us Sandy.Krietzman (Sandy Krietzman) dep.state.nj.us> <Christine. Schell «Christine.Schell@dep. deq. virginia.gov> <damcleod «damcleod@deq.virginia.gov» <jesydnor (<jesydnor@deq.virginia.gov»
epa.gov morris.makeba (morris.makeba@epa.gov) mde.state.md.us

MDEP02.MDEDOM

aheltibridle CC (Andrew Heltibridle) bhug CC (Brian Hug) dfranks CC (Diane Franks) drabin CC (Debbie Rabin) gabum CC (Tad Aburn) jwilkinson CC (Jim Wilkinson) rcarroll CC (Randall Carroll) rrnosier CC (Randy Mosier) rthunell CC (Roger Thunell)mdot. state.md.us hsimons (Hsimons@mdot.state.md.us)
mwcog.org jrohlfs (Joan Rohlfs)

state. pa. us> <jhavens (<jhavens@state.pa.us» wilmapco.org> <bswiatek «bswiatek@wilmapco.org» wvdep.org fdurham (Fred Durham (E-mail)) Post Office GWIAMDEDOM

MDEP02.MDEDOM

Files MESSAGE Balt Hearing.DOC Cecil Hearing.DOC Options Expiration Date: Priority: Reply Requested: Return Notification: Concealed Subject: Security: Size 7848 26112 26112

None Standard No None
No Standard Route baltometro.org> dc.gov> dep.state.nj.us dep.state.nj.us> deq. virginia. gOY> epa.gov mde.state.md. us mdot.state.md. us mwcog.org state.pa. us> wilmapco.org> wvdep.org



### Date & Time 04/20/07 01:06PM 04/18/07 03:36PM 04/18/07 03:36PM
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA-01801]


Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Winslow Plant, Winslow, Maine; 
Including Leased Workers of Northeast Laboratories, Winslow, Maine; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA-
Transitional Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(A), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor 
issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on 
August 27, 1997, applicable to all workers of the Winslow Plant of 
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, located in Winslow, Maine.
    The notice was published in the Federal Register on September 30, 
1997 (62 FR 32376).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information provided 
by the State shows that some employees of Northeast Laboratories, 
Winslow, Maine were engaged in employment related to performing 
environmental testing for the production of bath tissue produced by the 
Winslow Plant of Kimberly-Clark Corporation located in Winslow, Maine. 
Worker separations occurred at Northeast Laboratories as a result of 
worker separations at Kimberly-Clark Corporation.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending the 
certification to include workers of Northeast Laboratories, Winslow, 
Maine leased to Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Winslow, Maine.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Kimberly-Clark adversely affected by imports.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-01801 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of the Winslow Plant of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, 
located in Winslow, Maine, and leased workers of Northeast 
Laboratories, Winslow, Maine engaged in employment related to 
environmental testing for the production of bath tissue produced by 
the Winslow Plant of Kimberly-Clark Corporation located in Winslow, 
Maine who became totally or partially separated from employment on 
of after July 7, 1996 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under 
Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 10th day of October, 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-28245 Filed 10-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3346

___________________________

Brandon Scroggin

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Credit Bureau of Jonesboro, Inc.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro

____________

 Submitted: August 5, 2014

Filed: August 15, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Brandon Scroggin appeals an order of the district court, directing him to pay

1

attorney’s fees as a sanction for deliberately misusing the judicial process. After

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas. 
careful review, we find no abuse of the district court’s broad discretion to sanction

a party under its inherent powers. See Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 56-57

(1991) (party’s deliberate misuse of judicial process was sanctionable under court’s

inherent powers; amount of award was warranted by, inter alia, need to ensure abuses

would not be repeated); Kelly v. Golden, 352 F.3d 344, 352 (8th Cir. 2003) (district

court has broad discretion to decide appropriate sanctions); Lamb Eng’g & Constr.

Co. v. Nebraska Pub. Power Dist., 103 F.3d 1422, 1435 (8th Cir. 1997) (inherent

power depends on conduct during litigation, not on which party wins); see also Marx

v. Gen. Revenue Corp., 133 S. Ct. 1166, 1175-76 (2013) (district court has inherent

power to award attorney’s fees, notwithstanding attorney’s fees provisions of Federal

Debt Collection Practices Act). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
II 

Calendar No. 326 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3639 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2075 West Stadium Boulevard in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as the ‘‘Robert 

Hayden Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23, 2024 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Ms. STABENOW) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

FEBRUARY 6, 2024 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2075 West Stadium Boulevard in Ann Arbor, 

Michigan, as the ‘‘Robert Hayden Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROBERT HAYDEN POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 2075 West Stadium Boulevard 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3639 RS

1 in Ann Arbor, Michigan, shall be known and designated 

2 as the ‘‘Robert Hayden Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert Hayden Post 

7 Office’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 326 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3639 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostHayden Post Office’’. vard in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as the ‘‘Robert al Service located at 2075 West Stadium BouleFEBRUARY 6, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation: Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) Date Staff Contact Information 

(Name, email, phone #) 

Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, 

reporting requirements, etc.)

WrittComProvDid tsubmDock

May 13, 2010 Kirsten Cappel 

(202) 343-9556 cappel.kirsten@epa.gov

• Outside participants identified below. • EPA Climate Change Division and EPA contractors: Kirsten Cappel, EPA; Scott Bartos, EPA; Deb Harris, ICF 

International.

Participants discussed comments on the proposed rule, Electronics Manufacturing (subpart I). Highlighted concerns/questions included: 1. Development of emission factors—process by which EPA would develop its own emission factors for the 7 manufacturing process categories; raised concerns that data would go into a “black box.” 2. Interactions with 3rd party 

stakeholders—concerns about process for input by 3rd party stakeholders, nonsemiconductor manufacturers not 

regulated by the GHG reporting rule, but with the opportunity to benefit financially from the rule depending on how it comes out. 3. Process by which EPA prepared its uncertainty analysis in the TSD. 

SIA comthe d

Outside Participants: Julie Hatcher, Latham and Watkins, julia.hatcher@lw.com; Laura Mendicino, Freescale, laura.mendicino@freesDave Speed, IBM, speed@us.ibm.com; Janet Doyle, IBM, jmdoyle@us.ibm.com; Stephen Harper, Intel, stephenTim Higgs, Intel, tim.g.higgs@intel.com; Cynthia Johnson, TI, ckjohnson@TI.com; Tom Diamond, SIA, tdiamo

1
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 1993 - Present

MD Motor Vehicle Accident Report Manual 

1993,

MD eMAARS Data Dictionary 2008

04 Disabled (incapacitating) 

[becomes 

Incapacitating/Disabled Injury 

in 2008]

A

An incapacitating injury is any injury, other than a fatal injury, which prevents the injured 

person from walking, driving, or normally continuing the activities he was capable of 

performing before the injury occurred.

48 INJ SEV (Injury Severity) [becomes 31 

Injury Severity in 2008]

codes & definitions found in 

Manual pg75 (PDF pg78), updated 

codes found in Data Dictionary 

pg10.

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE STATE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 1993 - Present Pedestrians and Pedalcyclist considered PED Traffic Units MD MAARS Report Form Manual 1993,

MD Motor Vehicle Accident Report 2008

Pedestrian 01 No definition found. 47 Type code found on Manual pg83 (PDF 

pg86) . 

Other Conveyance 07 No definition found. 47 Type code found on Manual pg83 (PDF 

pg86) . 

Pedalcyclist 1993 - Present Pedestrians and Pedalcyclist considered PED Traffic Units

Bicyclist 02 No definition found. 47 Type code found on Manual pg83 (PDF 

pg86) . 

Other Pedalcyclist 03 No definition found. 47 Type code found on Manual pg83 (PDF 

pg86) . 

Maryland
**Exhibit      32.1**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  SAL PERISANO                    |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Sal                  Perisano                             |
|   | Chief                  Executive                  Officer |
#### Pamela CONARY, Appellant, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE AND LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION, LTD., Appellee.

No. 69-608.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 17, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 6, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Patrick Farrell, certify that:

 

1.                         Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of iParty Corp.;

 

2.                         Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                         Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  November 12, 2003 | /s/ PATRICK  FARRELL                   |   |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | Patrick  Farrell                       |
|                          | President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----