alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George L. RUDOLPH, Susan Lee Crooke, and Sharon Frances Miller, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 51376, 51377 and 51378.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 15, 1977.

Henry R. Barksdale, Pensacola, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments of conviction in these cases are affirmed. *State v. Bales,*343 So.2d 9 (Fla.1977).

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marimba, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as
filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard C. Wyckoff, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company for the periods presented in the Report.



|April 29, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    RICHARD C.
WYCKOF             
|-------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|               |  |  |  | Richard C. Wyckoff                   
|               |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President



*A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Marimba, Inc. and will be retained by Marimba, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,008-04

IN RE HERRON KENT DUCKETT, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 43,063-B-H-4 IN THE 124 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM GREGG COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this

Court’s original jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in

Gregg County in July 2021 and his application has not been properly forwarded to this Court.

Respondent, the District Clerk of Gregg County, shall forward Relator’s habeas application

to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habeas application in GreggCountyafter December

of 2020, or forward a copy of an order designating issues together with correspondence documenting

the date the State received Relator’s habeas application. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §

3(c) and (d); TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall

comply with this order within thirty days from the date of this order.
2

Filed: April 6, 2022

Do not publish
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO** 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

I,John Farahi, Chief Executive Officer of Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.               The Annual Report on Form 10-Kof the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2.               The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /S/  JOHN FARAHI         |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| John  Farahi             |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| March 15,  2010     |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NVR, Inc.
 Date:      February 25, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Paul C. SavillePaul C. SavillePresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Dennis M. SeremetDennis M. SeremetSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer 99
```

[104th Congress Public Law 100]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ100.104]

Public Law 104-100
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To designate the United States Post Office building located at 24 
 Corliss Street, Providence, Rhode Island, as the ``Harry Kizirian Post 
        Office Building''. <<NOTE: Feb. 1, 1996 -  [H.R. 1606]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 24 Corliss Street, 
Providence, Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as the ``Harry 
Kizirian Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Harry Kizirian Post Office Building''.

    Approved February 1, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1606:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 141 (1995):
                                    Oct. 17, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                    Oct. 24, considered and passed 
                                        Senate, amended.
                                                        Vol. 142 (1996):
                                    Jan. 5, Senate receded from its 
                                        amendments.

                                  <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RAVANNA SPENCER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 06-132 Erie

v. )

)

C/O FIES, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was received by the Clerk of

Court on June 5, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan

Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act,

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 2], filed on June

13, 2006, recommended that Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

[Doc. No. 1] be denied and the case be dismissed without prejudice. The parties were

allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on

Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. Objections were filed by Plaintiff on June

22, 2006 [Doc. No. 3]. After de novo review of the motion and documents in the case,

together with the Report and Recommendation and Objections thereto, the following

order is entered:

AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2006;

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 2] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on June 13, 2006 is not adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an affidavit and a certified

copy of her institutional account consistent with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. §

1915(a)(1) and (2) within ten (10) days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will

result in the dismissal of this case. 

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00132-SJM-SPB Document 4 Filed 07/11/06 Page 1 of 2
2

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00132-SJM-SPB Document 4 Filed 07/11/06 Page 2 of 2
No. D-2213.

#### In re Disbarment of Galley.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see *ante,*p. 1007.]
# L_2005031EN.01002601.xml

| 4.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 31/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 31/26

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 198/2005

of 3 February 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004 of 3 September 2004 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden for the 2004/2005 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 28 January to 3 February 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 3 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 3.

3

---
#### Robert MORRISON and John W. Morrison, Appellants, v. W. B. KIPP, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-607.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 17, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 18, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alexis Korybut, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Alexis Korybut Alexis Korybut Chief Executive Officer August 20, 2012
1 NO. 04-14-00657- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

RICHARD LESHIN, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE

OF THE DAVILA FAMILY TRUST, TRUST A,

APPELLANT

VS.

JUAN GERARDO OLIVA, INDIVIDUALLY, AND

ROSINA OLIVA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE DAVILA FAMILY TRUST,

TRUSTS B, C AND D,

APPELLEES

From the 406 th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Cause No. 2008-CVF-000855- D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

The undersigned files this Notice of Change of Address and requests that the C ourt’s

docket in the above styled cause be updated accordingly:

Allen Cazier

1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 725

San Antonio, Texas 78209

Email: cazlaw@yahoo.com

Telephone: (210) 824-3278

Fax: (210) 824-3937

All filings, correspondence and notices should be sent to this address. ACCEPTED

04-14-00657-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

3/5/2015 10:27:52 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK2 Respectfully submitted,

OLIVERO E. CANALES

State Bar No. 03737200

719 Chihuahua St., Suite 102

Laredo, Texas 78040

956/723

- 5092 (telephone)

956/723

- 1327 (fax)

ALLEN CAZIER

1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 725

San Antonio, Texas 78209

Telephone: 210/824

- 3 278

Telecopier: 210/824

- 3937

By: /s/ Allen Cazier

ALLEN CAZIER

State Bar No. 04037500

Attorneys for Appellee

, Rosina Oliva, Individually and as

Successor Trustee of the Davila

Family Trust, Trusts B, C & D

Certificate of Service

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was, on

this 5th day of March , 201 5 , served by e

- mail and/or by fax upon the below listed

attorneys of record for their respective parties:

Guadalupe Castillo

Zaffirini and Castillo

1407 Washington

Laredo, Texas 78042

Facsimile: 956/727

- 4448

Email: gcast@zaffirini.com3

David C. “Clay” Snell

Bayne, Snell & Krause

1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 725

San Antonio, Texas 78209

Facsimile: 210/824

- 3937

Email: dsnell@bsklaw.com

Eduard Romero

Villarreal & Romero, PLLC

210 W. Del Mar Blvd., Suite 15

Laredo, Texas 78041

Facsimile: 956/727

- 2404

Email: romero@vrlawfirm.com

/s/ Allen Cazier

ALLEN CAZIER
#### SILICONE COATING SYSTEMS, a division of General Electric Company, and General Electric Company, Petitioners, v. VOLUSIA JAI ALAI, INC., Individually and f/u/b/o Travelers Insurance Company, Respondent.

No. KK-198.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 21, 1978.

Goble D. Dean of Dean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, Orlando, for petitioners.

Frank M. Palmour of Gurney, Gurney & Handley, Orlando, Donald L. Gattis, Mait-land, Eli H. Subin, Ronald M. Owen, Orlando, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners, by petition for writ of common law certiorari, seek review of an interlocutory order of the trial court refusing to grant a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the parties were litigating the identical issues in a pending federal case. Respondent heretofore moved for dismissal on jurisdictional grounds, but because of the complexity of the facts and issues involved we delayed ruling on that motion until hearing oral argument on the merits. The parties correctly concede that the order sought to be reviewed is not one subject to interlocutory appeal. Upon consideration we do not *481find that the learned trial judge departed from the essential requirements of law, therefore, common law certiorari is inappropriate. Finding as we do, that we are without jurisdiction, the petition for writ of common law certiorari is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and SMITH and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
#### Johnson WOODS, Petitioner, v. CAROL CITY UTILITIES, INC., Bituminous Casualty Corporation, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38539.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 30, 1969.

Ira J. Druckman, Miami, for petitioner.

Eugene E. Williams, of Williams & Jabara, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 20, 1969.

*512We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, suhd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Accordingly, the petitions for certiorari and attorney’s fee are hereby denied.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7029

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CIRILO GOMEZ, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00033-WO-2)

Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cirilo Gomez, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cirilo Gomez, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying 

his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Gomez, No. 1:10-cr-00033-WO-2 (M.D.N.C. 

July 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
May 28, 2015 

 

Mr. David Holden 

222 East Adams Street 

OFallen, IL 62269 

Dear Mr. David Holden: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 22, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1110), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Board of Directors
Starcraft Corporation and Subsidiaries
Goshen, Indiana

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 No.  33-73148)  pertaining  to the  Starcraft  Automotive  Corporation
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust,  in the  Registration  Statement (Form S-8
No. 33-70030) pertaining to the Starcraft Automotive Corporation Stock Incentive
Plan, and in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-28247 and 333-30052)
pertaining to the Starcraft  Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan of our report
dated November 9, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Starcraft Corporation and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the years ended October 1, 2000, October 3, 1999 and September 27, 1998.

                                              /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Elkhart, Indiana
January 23, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          7743
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               44652
<PP&E>                                         15505
<DEPRECIATION>                                (3983)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1309587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         490178
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      185377
<OTHER-SE>                                    634032
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1309587
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 567701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            122968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (690669)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (690669)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (690669)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.04)



</TABLE>