alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 11 59 2 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ D. C. Dock etNo. 1 :1 2- cv -0 02 16 -IPJ -RRA TERRY DONNELLWATSON, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll an t, ve rs us WARDEN, STATE OF AL ABAMA, ATTORNEY G ENERAL, STAT E OF ALABAMA, COMM ISSI ONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RONALD CAVANAU GH, Med ic al Rev ie w Offic er, i nd iv idua ll y an d in hi s o ffi ci al cap aci ty acti ng “un de r co lo r of st at e la w,” et a l.,

Defen da nt s- App el le es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e North ernDis tri ctof Al ab am a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (J anua ry 22 , 20 13 ) Case: 12-11592 Date Filed: 01/22/2013 Page: 1 of 2Befo re MAR CUS, KRAVITCH, an d EDMONDSON, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

PER CURI AM: Terry W at so n, an in m at e atth e Ch il de rs bu rg Co m m un ity W ork C en te r in Alab am a, ap pe al s pr o s e th e d is tri ctco urt’s d en ia l o f hi s re qu es t fo r a p rel im in ary in jun ct io n t o e njo inth e cu rren t p ro cedur es an d p ract ic es forin m at e dru g t es ti ng co nduc te d b y

th e Alaba m a Dep art m en t o f Co rrec ti on s (“ DOC”) an d the im pl em en ta ti on of DOC Ad m in is tra ti ve Reg ul at io n # 44 0 (“ AR 44 0" ). The d is tri ct co urt d idno t ab us e it s d is cret io n i n d en y in g the in jun ct io n. Fo r ba ck gr ou nd , see W ol ff v . McDo nn el l, 4 18 U.S. 53 9, 9 4 S . Ct. 2 96 3, 2 98 2- 83 , 41 L.Ed 2d93 5 (1 97 4) . The p ub li c’s in te res t i n the adm in is tra ti on of asaf e p ris on syste m , free o f drug s, i s g reat . Bes id es , W at so n fa il edto sh ow tha t h e wou ldsu ffer anim m in en t, irr ep arab le in

jury (on e n otco m

pe ns ab le th ro ug h m on et ary da m ag es ) inth e ab se nc e o f a p rel im in ary in jun ct io n. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-11592 Date Filed: 01/22/2013 Page: 2 of 2
#### H. Jerry JARZEM, Appellant, v. J. Roy HALL, Appellee.

No. 70-59.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 27, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Neis R. Pearson, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                       PDV AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Year Ended December 31,
                                               ----------------------------------------------------
                                                 2002       2001       2000       1999       1998
                                               --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
                                                               (Dollars in Thousands)
<S>                                            <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before provision for income taxes       $299,671   $623,405   $519,399   $200,415   $361,703
    Distributions in excess of equity
       earnings of affiliates                    22,313     44,521     68,196     82,847     46,180
    Equity earnings (losses) in excess of
       distributions                               --         --         --         --         --
    Interest                                    115,582    119,579    149,169    165,351    180,241
    Amortization of previously capitalized
       interest                                   3,876      3,859      3,709      3,076      2,858
    Portion of rent representative of
       interest factor                           33,916     25,727     21,056     21,056     20,722
                                               --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
       Income as adjusted                      $475,358   $817,091   $761,529   $472,745   $611,704
                                               ========   ========   ========   ========   ========

Fixed charges
    Interest expense                           $115,582   $119,579   $149,169   $165,351   $180,241
    Capitalized interest                          3,700      2,000      4,000      7,000      5,000
    Portion of rent representative of
       interest factor                           33,916     25,727     21,056     21,056     20,722
                                               --------   --------   --------   --------   --------


       Total fixed charges                     $153,198   $147,306   $174,225   $193,407   $205,963
                                               ========   ========   ========   ========   ========

Ratio of earnings to
    fixed charges                                 3.10x      5.55x      4.37x      2.44x      2.97x
</TABLE>
#### Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL.

77-210.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 3, 1978.

ALMON, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
#### Ulysses R. KELLY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. HH-260.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 16, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 26, 1978.

*494Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Janice G. Scott, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Patti Englander and George R. Georgieff, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of sexual battery contrary to F.S. 794.011(3), and was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment with credit for 171 days jail time. Notice of appeal of the judgment and sentence was filed. Subsequently, pursuant to the State’s motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800, the sentence of twenty years was set aside as contrary to F.S. 775.082(3)(a), and a sentence of thirty years with credit for 171 days in the county jail awaiting disposition plus credit for all time served to date was imposed.

Since notice of appeal vested exclusive jurisdiction in this court, *(State ex rel. Faircloth v. District Court of Appeal, Third District,*187 So.2d 890 (Fla.1966)) the trial court did not have jurisdiction to correct the initial sentence. Although the sentencing alternatives under sections 948.01 and 959.115 were available *(Roberts v. State,*335 So.2d 285 (Fla.1976); *Berezovsky v. State,*350 So.2d 80 (Fla.1977)), the twenty year sentence was illegal. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed but the cause is remanded for imposition of sentence in accordance with law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

McCORD, C. J., and MELVIN and BOYER, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

By motion for rehearing appellant urges that we overlooked and failed to consider his contention that certain testimony adduced at the trial constituted an impermissible comment on his constitutional right to remain silent, citing *Bennett v. State,*316 So.2d 41 (Fla.1976) and *Shannon v. State,*320 So.2d 855 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). We have not overlooked nor failed to consider that point, but our review of the record reveals it to be without merit.

Petition for rehearing is denied.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
1 The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2234

___________ De Andra Pye, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri CO-I Robert Keener, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 31, 2001 Filed: February 7, 2001

___________ Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmate De Andra Pye appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Missouri following an adverse jury verdict in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Pye has moved for preparation of the trial transcript at government

expense and for oral argument. We deny the former motion because Pye has not satisfied his burden of demonstrating that the appeal presents a substantial qu estion. In particular, the trial evidence he points to is not contrary to the jury’s-2-

verdict. See Rhodes v. Corps of Eng’rs , 589 F.2d 358, 359-60 (8th Cir. 1978) (per curiam) (denying transcript prepared at government expense where in forma pauperis appellant made only conclusory allegations that trial court erred in ruling against her). Because we are unable to review the issues Pye raises without a transcript, we deny Pye’s motion for oral argument and dismiss the appeal. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
MARYLAND - AGENCY CONTACTS

MD FHWA FHWA 

EFL

Jacinda Russell Access Program 

Manager

Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov 571-434-1543

MD FHWA FHWA 

EFL

Lewis Grimm Planning Team 

Leader

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov 703-404-6289

MD FHWA FHWADOKwame Arhin Planning Program 

Manager

Kwame.Arhin@dot.gov 410-779-7158

MD LPA LPA Steven Overbay Member, County 

Engineers 

Association of 

Maryland

ssoverbay@harfordcountymd.gov 410-638-3059

MD State MSHA Greg Slater MSHA Planning 

Director

gslater@sha.state.md.us 410-545-0412

MD State MSHA Christy Bernal Transportation 

Alternatives 

Program Manager 

Cbernal@sha.state.md.us 410-545-5659

MD FLMA NPS John Tauscher Northeast FLTP 

Coordinator

John_Tauscher@nps.gov 617-223-5042

MD FLMA FWS Carl Melberg Regional 

Coordinator

Carl_Melberg@fws.gov 413-253-8586

MD FLMA NPS Makayah Royal National Capital 

Region FLTP 

Coordinator

Makayah_Royal@nps.gov 202-619-7092

MD FLMA USFS Rosana Barkawi Transportation 

System Dev. &

FHWA Liaison 

Program Manager

rosanabarkawi@fs.fed.us 703-605-4509

MD FLMA DOD 

(nonUSACE)

Jason Cowin Senior 

Engineer/HNDSDDCTEA

Jason.W.Cowin.civ@mail.mil 618-220-5229

MD FLMA DOD 

(USACE)

Mike Vissichelli Regulatory Appeals 

Review Officer

Michael.G.Vissichelli@usace.army.mil 347-370-4663
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Jonathan R. Burst, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International FuelTechnology, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructionscontained in SEC Release 34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 13, 2006         By: /s/ Jonathan R. Burst       Jonathan R. Burst      Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-910-0777-51]


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Iditarod Advisory Council Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Iditarod Advisory Council will conduct an open meeting 
Wednesday, November 12, 1997, and Thursday, November 13, 1997, from 9 
a.m. to 5 p.m. each day. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the 
formation of a non-profit organization to assist in the management of 
the Iditarod National Historic Trail. The meeting will be held at the 
Iditarod Trail Committee Headquarters in Wasilla, AK.
    Public comments pertaining to management of the Iditarod National 
Historic Trail will be taken from 1-2 p.m. on Wednesday, November 12. 
Written comments may be submitted at the meeting or mailed to the 
address below prior to the meeting.

ADDRESSES: Inquiries about the meeting should be sent to External 
Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, 222 W. 7th Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa McPherson at (907) 271-5555.

    Dated: October 7, 1997.
Tom Allen,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 97-27219 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0938

Docket Number

2012-SW-057-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM

Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 05.00.63, Revision 1, dated June 18, 

2012.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
AFS-13-188-E 

March 26, 2013 

 Exemption No. 10241A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-11883 

Mr. L. S. Dibble 

Director of Plans, Policy and Programs 

U.S. Department of the Army 

Aeronautical Services Agency 

Fort Belvoir, VA 22060 

Dear Mr. Dibble: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10241. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated January 23, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of U.S. Department of the Army (U.S. Army) for an extension of Exemption 

No. 10241. That exemption from § 91.169(a)(2) and (c) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations allows the U.S. Army to file instrument flight rules flight plans in accordance 

with the regulations prescribed by the U.S. Army. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to U.S. Army. 

Our Decision 
2 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10241 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10241 to April 30, 2017, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John S. Duncan 

Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

Service 

Enclosure
#### MARYLAND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Georgia corporation, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, for the Use and Benefit of DADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 70-828-70-831.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 17, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeals dismissed.
THE STATE 

o~LASKA 

GOVERNOR SEAN PARNELL 

November 7, 2012 

N.IT.DerntisJ.DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Essential Air Service at Akutan (7 AK) 

DOCKET DOT -OST -2000-7068 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

Department of Transportation and 

·. Public Facilities 

:·; OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER 

; -:; C) j: r} -1 P.O. Box 196900 

Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6900 

Main: 907.269.0730 

Fax: 907.269.0489 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the selection of an air carrier for Akutan, Alaska. 

I am writing to express my strong support for the continuation of the Essential Air Service (EAS) 

program in Alaska and to emphasize the crucial access it provides to our remote communities. 

Due to the isolated location of Akutan, which is located in the Aleutian Islands and so lacks any 

road system connection, EAS subsidized air service is the community's only form of scheduled 

transportation. Akutan depends on scheduled air carrier service for freight, passenger, and mail 

service for basic necessities, access to routine health services, and economic welfare. 

The State of Alaska continues to assert that the local residents are generally best positioned to 

comment on particular schedules or air carriers, and therefore we think the community should 

provide comments to you on those specific issues. 

I respectfully urge the US DOT to support and continue EAS service for Akutan, Alaska. 

Sincerely, 

Deputy Commissioner- Aviation 

"Get A Iaska Moving through service and if!frastructure. "
#### Roland DeBRUIN, Appellant, v. U-HAUL CO., Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-941.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 11, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3061 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3061

 To revoke the waiver determination submitted to Congress on September 
  11, 2023, with respect to certain sanctions imposed with respect to 
                                 Iran.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2023

Mr. Marshall (for himself, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Vance, Mr. Scott 
 of Florida, Mr. Braun, and Mrs. Britt) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revoke the waiver determination submitted to Congress on September 
  11, 2023, with respect to certain sanctions imposed with respect to 
                                 Iran.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF WAIVER DETERMINATION WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN 
              IRAN SANCTIONS.

    (a) In General.--On and after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the waiver determination issued by the Secretary of State pursuant 
the provisions of law specified in subsection (b) and submitted to 
Congress on September 11, 2023, shall have no force or effect.
    (b) Provisions of Law Specified.--The provisions of law specified 
in this subsection are--
            (1) section 1245(d)(5) of the National Defense 
        Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8513a(d)(5)); 
        or
            (2) section 1244(i) or 1247(f) of the Iran Freedom and 
        Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8803(i) and 
        8806(f)).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               21,469
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     64,119
<PP&E>                                              918,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                      217,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,601,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,043,995
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              4,208
<OTHER-SE>                                          362,590
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        366,798
<SALES>                                              22,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     22,195
<CGS>                                                21,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       514,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (175,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   18,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (357,308)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (357,308)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (357,308)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (357,308)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


</TABLE>