Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 205 / Thursday, October 23, 1997 / Notices 55227

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. TM98–1–97–002]

Chandeleur Pipe Line Company;

Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC

Gas Tariff

October 17, 1997.

Take notice on October 14, 1997,

Chandeleur Pipe Line Company

(Chandeleur) tendered for filing as part

of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised

Volume No. 1, Second Substitute

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 5, with an

effective date of October 1, 1997.

Chandeleur states that the filing is

being made to correct its September 12,

1997 filing. Chandeleur states that it is

replacing one of the two maximum rate

columns with the appropriate minimum

rate column consistent with the

effective Sixth Revised Sheet No. 5.

Any person desiring to protest this

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211. All such protests should be

filed in accordance with Section

154.210 of the Commission’s

Regulations. Protests will be considered

by the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–28108 Filed 10–22–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP98–15–000]

Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Request Under

Blanket Authorization

October 17, 1997.

Take notice that on October 9, 1997,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue,

SE., Charleston, West Virginia 25314–

1599, filed in the above docket, a

request pursuant to Sections 157.205

and 157.211 of the Commission’s

Regulations, and Columbia’s

authorization in Docket No. CP83–76–

000, for authorization to construct and

operate the facilities necessary to

establish ten additional points of

delivery to existing customers for firm

transportation service, all as more fully

set forth in the request which is on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

Specifically, Columbia proposes to

construct and operate new points of

delivery to Columbia Gas of Ohio (COH)

in Medina County, Ohio; Lorain County,

Ohio; and Richland County, Ohio,

which will involve construction of

interconnecting facilities located

between Columbia’s existing right-ofway to provide the service. COH will

install a meter within Columbia’s

existing right-of-way to provide this

service.

Columbia also proposes to construct

and operate new points of delivery to

Mountaineer Gas Company (MGC) in

Marshall County, West Virginia;

Kanawah County, West Virginia; Roane

County, West Virginia; Mercer County,

West Virginia; Clay County, West

Virginia (two points of delivery); and in

Upshur County, West Virginia, which

will involve the construction of

interconnecting facilities located on

Columbia’s existing right-of-way to

provide this service. MGC will install a

meter within Columbia’s existing rightof-way to provide this service.

Columbia states that neither COH nor

MGC have requested an increase in their

peak day entitlements in conjunction

with this request for these new points of

delivery. Therefore, there is no impact

of Columbia’s peak day obligation to its

other customers as a result of the

establishment of the proposed new

facilities.

Columbia states that the

interconnecting facilities for each new

point of delivery vary according to

conditions encountered at each location;

however, because the proposed points

of delivery to COH and MGC relate to

routine residential taps, the following

facilities are representative of what will

be installed at each location: a 4-inch by

1-inch tap saddle (depending on the size

of the pipeline for each requested

point); a 1-inch valve, nipple, and less

than 20 feet of pipe on Columbia’s

existing right-of-way. Columbia

indicates that COH and MGC will set

the meter and regulator at each location.

Columbia states that the quantities to

be provided through the new points of

delivery will be within Columbia’s

authorized level of services. Therefore,

there is no impact on its existing design

day and annual obligations to the

Customers as a result of the construction

and operation of the new points of

delivery for firm transportation service.

Columbia further states that it will

comply with the environmental

requirements of Section 157.206(d) of

the Commission’s regulations prior to

the construction and operation of the

proposed facilities.

Columbia estimated that the cost to

install the new taps to be approximately

$150 per tap and will be treated as an

O&M expense.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–28035 Filed 10–22–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. GT97–65–001]

K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co.;

Notice of Tariff Filing

October 17, 1997.

Take notice that on October 14, 1997,

K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co.

(KNI) tendered for filing as part of its

FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume

No. 1–A, Substitute First Revised Sheet

No. 2, the following revised tariff sheet,

to be effective September 28, 1997:

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 2

KNI states that the above referenced

tariff sheet is being filed to correct a

deletion of reference to the state of

Nebraska within its Preliminary

Statement. The reference to the state of

Nebraska was in the Original Sheet No.

2 and should not have been taken out

of the Preliminary Statement. KNI has

submitted Substituted First Revised

Sheet No. 2 to reinstate the include of

the state of Nebraska as a place of doing

business.

KNI states that copies of the filing

were served upon KNI’s jurisdictional

customers, interested public bodies and

all parties to the proceeding.