alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.
AY JUN 13 2018 Washington, DC 20590
US. Department

of Transportation

Federal Highway
Administration

In Reply Refer To: HCR-20
DOT# 2018-0133

Subject: Dismissal of Complaint DOT# 2018-0133

Dear

This letter is to inform you that the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Office of Civil
Rights has determined that it will dismiss the above complaint, which alleged violations that may
be related to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI) and USDOT’s implementation
regulations at 49 C.F.R. Part 21 and/or 23 C.F.R. Part 200. To be accepted for investigation, a
complaint must meet the jurisdictional requirements described in FHWA’s Investigations
Manual, which conforms to the U.S. Department of Justice’s procedures and standards for
investigating complaints of discrimination. First, the complaint must be in writing. Second, it
must describe an alleged discriminatory act that, if true, would fall under FHWA’s jurisdiction
and potentially violate FHWA’s nondiscrimination regulations. Finally, it must be filed within
180 calendar days of the alleged discriminatory act.

After careful consideration, the FHWA has concluded that it must dismiss this complaint. Title
VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and
activities receiving Federal financial assistance.

You alleged that the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) discriminated against you
and other residents in Carson City, NV, because NDOT did not follow proper noise abatement
procedures regarding the development and final construction of the Carson City Freeway
extension project in Carson City, NV. However, the allegations and facts in your complaint do
not meet the minimum criteria from which FHWA could establish a case of disparate treatment
under Title VI. For these reasons, this complaint will be dismissed by FHWA and closed with no
further action.

If you have any questions, please contact Nichole McWhorter at (202) 366-1396.


Sincerely,

Table AWS

Nichole McWhorter
Title VI Team Leader
Office of Civil Rights

Ce: Susan Klekar, Division Administrator, FHWA Nevada Division Office
Greg Novak, Acting Assistant Division Administrator, FHWA Nevada Division Office
Daniel Hawk, Right-of-Way and Civil Rights Program Manager, FHWA Nevada Division
Office
James Esselman, Senior Attorney-Advisor, FHWA Office of the Chief Counsel
Kevin Resler, National Title VI Program Manager, FHWA Office of Civil Rights
Yvette Rivera, Director, Equal Employment Opportunity Programs Division, Departmental

Office of Civil Rights

Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 4.5

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 1999 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN OFTARO PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made effective August 5, 2004, by TARO PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. (the Company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Country of Israel.

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan of Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (the Plan), which was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on March 10, 1999, and approved be the stockholders of the Company on July 20, 1999.

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to allow the grant of stock options to the Companys Identified Public Directors, as such term is defined under the Israel Companies Law.

WHEREAS, the Companys shareholders, at the Annual General Meeting held on August 5, 2004, approved a resolution to amend the Plan to allow for the grant of stock options to Identified Public Directors as provided by new regulations issued under the Israel Companies Law.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of August 5, 2004, as follows:

| | 1. |  | By deleting from the first sentence of the last sub-paragraph of paragraph 4 the phrase (other than an Identified Public Director).
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   
| | 2. |  | By deleting paragraph 20(e) in its entirety and substituting therefore [Reserved].                                                 
| |   
| | 3. |  | By deleting from paragraph 20(g) the phrase and is not an Identified Public Director.                                              

Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this Second Amendment.

[Remainder of page left intentionally blank]

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to be executed, effective as of the day and year first above written.

| | TARO PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.                   
| | ------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                       
| | By: /s/ Kevin Connelly                                
| |                                                       
| | Title: Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

---
#### The CLEVELAND TRUST COMPANY, Appellant, v. RICKARDS ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 76-886.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 22, 1977.

Richard D. Rosen and Lewis I. Horwitz of Broad & Cassel, Bay Harbor Islands, for appellant.

E. Clay Shaw, Jr., of Huebner, Shaw & Bunnell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appel-lee.

LETTS, Judge.

This is the companion case to Case No. 76-1079, namely the *Leader Mortgage Company v. Rickards Electric Service, Inc.,*Fla. App., 348 So.2d 1202, and the same record and issues are presented in both appeals.

In our view, the opinion filed in the companion case, immediately preceding this one, is dispositive of the identical final judgment appealed from.

The final money judgment against the Leader Mortgage Company and the Brusci-no Construction Company is hereby affirmed. The final judgment creating a lien on the real estate referred to in Exhibit A to secure the payment of the money judgment is reversed in part and remanded for the trial judge to set aside that portion of the final judgment.

MAGER, C. J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.1

                           Allis-Chalmers Corporation
                             7660 Woodway, Suite 200
                              Houston, Texas 77063





                                February 19, 2003



VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
---------------------------

Energy Spectrum Partners, LP
5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 900
Dallas, Texas  75225
Attention: Michael Tapp


         Re:         Modification of Series A Preferred Stock
                     ----------------------------------------

Gentlemen:

         Reference is made to the Certificate of Designation, Preferences and
Rights (the "Certificate") of the Series A 10% Cumulative Convertible Preferred
Stock (the "Preferred Stock") of Allis-Chalmers Corporation (the "Company")
issued to Energy Spectrum Partners LP ("Energy Spectrum"). As partial inducement
to Munawar and Jane Hidayatallah to continue to guarantee the obligations of the
Company to its lenders and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Energy Spectrum hereby agrees:

                  (a) To recommend, vote for and approve the amendment and
restatement (the "Amendment") of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation to
define the "Conversion Price," as such term is defined in the Certificate, to be
$.50 per share, subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11(b) of the
Certificate. The Amendment will require approval of the Company's stockholders
and Energy Spectrum agrees to vote all shares of Preferred Stock and all shares
of the Company's Common Stock (the "Common Stock") owned by it and its
affiliates in favor of the Amendment;

                  (b) Until such time, if any, as the Amendment has been filed
with Delaware Secretary of State and become effective (the "Effective Date"),
Energy Spectrum agrees that upon tender of the Preferred Stock for conversion
into Common Stock, the Conversion Price shall be $0.50 per share, subject to
adjustment in the manner set forth in Section 11(b) of the Certificate); and

                  (c) In the event that Energy Spectrum transfers any shares of
Preferred Stock prior to the Effective Date, Energy Spectrum agrees that as a
pre-condition of such transfer Energy Spectrum shall obtain the written
agreement of the transferee to be bound by the terms of this letter agreement to
the same extent as Energy Spectrum.

         To indicate your agreement with the foregoing, please execute a copy of
this letter and return it to the undersigned via fax (with the hard copy to
follow by U.S. mail).

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ Munawar H. Hidayatallah

                                            Munawar H. Hidayatallah
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Agreed and Acknowledged:
Energy Spectrum Partners, LP


By: /s/ Thomas Whitener
    -----------------------------
Name: Thomas Whitener
Title: Chief Operating Officer
2X} 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.
o Washington, DC 20590

US Department

of Transportation

Federal Highway
Administration

In Reply Refer To: HCR-20
AUG 9 8 2018 DOT# 2018-0280

Subject: Dismissal of Complaint DOT# 2018-0280

Dear

This letter is to inform you that the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Office of Civil
Rights has determined that it will dismiss the above complaint, which alleged violations of Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI) and USDOT’s implementation regulations at 49
C.F.R. Part 21 and/or 23 C.F.R. Part 200. To be accepted for investigation, a complaint must
meet the jurisdictional requirements described in FHWA’s Investigations Manual, which
conforms to the U.S. Department of Justice’s procedures and standards for investigating
complaints of discrimination. First, the complaint must be in writing. Second, it must describe an
alleged discriminatory act that, if true, would violate FHWA’s Title VI regulations (i-e., an
alleged discriminatory act based on race, color, national origin). Third, it must be filed within
180 calendar days of the alleged discriminatory act. Finally, complaints must be filed against a
recipient of financial assistance from FHWA.

After careful consideration, the FHWA has concluded that it must dismiss this complaint. Title
VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and
activities receiving Federal financial assistance.

You alleged that the City of Covington, GA discriminated against you and that you were subject
to disparate treatment based on your race by city officials when they refused to address issues
you brought to them concerning the state of repair of the sidewalk and landscaping in front of
your house. The City of Covington, GA is not a recipient of Federal financial assistance from
FHWA. For this reason, this complaint will be dismissed by FHWA and closed with no further
action.

If you have any questions, please contact Erich Hines at (202) 366-5991.


AS

bx Woaee

Nichole McWhorte:
Title VI Team Leader
Office of Civil Rights

Cc: Jermaine Hannon, Acting Division Administrator, FHWA Georgia Division Office
William Farr, Assistant Division Administrator, FHWA Georgia Division Office
Vanessa Ross, Equal Opportunity Specialist, FHWA Georgia Division Office
James Esselman, Senior Attorney-Advisor, FHWA Office of the Chief Counsel
Kevin Resler, National Title VI Program Manager, FHWA Office of Civil Rights

Yvette Rivera, Director, Equal Employment Opportunity Programs Division, Departmental
Office of Civil Rights

Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3539 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3539

   To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to remove the 
  exclusion of certain small business concerns from the disadvantaged 
          business enterprise program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2023

  Mr. Ossoff introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to remove the 
  exclusion of certain small business concerns from the disadvantaged 
          business enterprise program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Contracting Fairness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES.

    Section 11101(e)(2)(A) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs 
Act (Public Law 117-58; 135 Stat. 449) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(A) `Small business concern'.--The term `small 
                business concern' means a small business concern (as 
                the term is used in section 3 of the Small Business Act 
                (15 U.S.C. 632)).''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2014

p0721 

# Order

Clerk July 29, 2014

148755

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148755

COA: 316130

Alger CC: 06

- 001740

- FC

DONALD JAMES GATISS

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Fry’s Estate.

*Decedents’ estates*— Claims—-Parent *and child*— Evidence—Auditor— *Witness*— Party *dead.*

1. Where claims presented by a son against his deceased father’s estate are based only on loose declarations and admissions, and are rejected by the auditor for want of direct and positive proof, the Supreme Court will not reverse a decree of the orphans’ court dismissing exceptions to the auditor’s report.

*Evidence*— Incompetency—Witness—Act *of May 23, 1887, P. L. 158.*

*2.*A son who presents claims as a creditor against his father’s estate is an incompetent witness in support of such claims.

Argued Oct. 10, 1910.

Appeal, No. 14, Oct. T., 1910, by Frank Fry, from decree of O. C. Indiana Co., June T., 1905, No. 6, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report in *474Estate of James Fry, deceased.

January 3, 1911:

Before Fell, C. J., Mestrezat, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Exceptions to report of W. F. Elkin, Esq., auditor. Before Telford, P. J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

*Errors assigned*were in dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report.

*H. W. Storey,*with him *J. Wood Clark,*for appellant.

*W. B. Sands*and *Samuel Cunningham,*with them *J. S. Fisher,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

The claims presented by the appellant against his father’s estate were for money loaned, for money paid to a third person on his father’s account and for the amount of a bank deposit in the name of his father. They were supported only by oral testimony of loose declarations and admissions and were rejected by the auditor for want of direct and positive proofs. These claims were of a class requiring the closest scrutiny. Pollock v. Ray, 85 Pa. 428; Walls’s App., 111 Pa. 460, and we find no error in their rejection.

The appellant was incompetent as a witness in support of his claim and his testimony was properly excluded. He did not claim, as argued, by devolution but as a creditor and therefore had no standing under the exceptions of clause E, sec. 5, of the Act of May 23, 1887, P. L. 158. The order of the court dismissing exceptions to the report of the auditor is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Morrison Knudsen Corporation on Form S-8 (File No.s 033-81038, 333-32511 and
333-39351) of our report, which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding a
change in method of accounting for impairment of long-lived assets in 1996 and
an emphasis of a matter paragraph regarding an environmental contingency, dated
January 25, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Morrison Knudsen Corporation as of November 30,
1998 and 1997, and for each of the three years in the period ended November 30,
1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Boise, Idaho
February 4, 1999

                                      E-2
# Check

# MRG
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

ME-10 Furbish Road Elevate Roadway to 

Reduce Flooding

U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service - Rachel Carson 

National Wildlife Refuge

Town of Wells York 2019

ME-15 East B Hill Road- Phase 2 Resurfacing

U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service - Umbagog 

National Wildlife Refuge

Town of Upton Oxford 2021

ME-16 County Road Resurfacing

U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service - Sunkhaze 

Meadows National 

Wildlife Refuge

Town of Milford Penobscot 2021

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Maine Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Maine FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Maine Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2019-2022

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The Maine PDC does not have a firm date for the next 

Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please watch our website for updates in your state. https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/flap/

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001078352
<NAME>                        Fundae Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         16,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,000
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,737
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       140
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,737
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,737)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,  I, Robin List, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by this Report.

 

 

| Date:    November 20, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Robin List                |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                                           |   | Robin List                    |
|                                           |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                                           |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |