alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005016EN.01005501.xml

| 20.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/55

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 82/2005

of 19 January 2005

on the issue of import licences for sugar and sugar and cocoa mixtures with ACP/OCT or EC/OCT cumulation of origin

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 2001/822/EC of 27 November 2001 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Community (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 192/2002 of 31 January 2002 laying down detailed rules for issuing import licences for sugar and sugar and cocoa mixtures with ACP/OCT or EC/OCT cumulation of origin (2), and in particular Article 6(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 6(4) of Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC allows ACP/EC-OCT cumulation of origin in the case of products falling within Chapter 17 and tariff headings 1806 10 30 and 1806 10 90 up to an annual quantity of 28 000 tonnes of sugar. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 6(4) of Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC allows ACP/EC-OCT cumulation of origin in the case of products falling within Chapter 17 and tariff headings 1806 10 30 and 1806 10 90 up to an annual quantity of 28 000 tonnes of sugar.

| (2) | Applications have been submitted to the national authorities in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 192/2002 for the issue of import licences for a total quantity of 112 000 tonnes, exceeding the quantity laid down in Decision 2001/822/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Applications have been submitted to the national authorities in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 192/2002 for the issue of import licences for a total quantity of 112 000 tonnes, exceeding the quantity laid down in Decision 2001/822/EC.

| (3) | The Commission must therefore set the reducing coefficient for the issue of import licences and suspend the submission of further licence applications for 2005, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Commission must therefore set the reducing coefficient for the issue of import licences and suspend the submission of further licence applications for 2005,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Import licences covered by applications submitted by 7 January 2005 under Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 192/2002 shall be issued for 25 % of the quantity applied for.

Article 2

The submission of further applications for 2005 is hereby suspended.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 January 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 314, 30.11.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 55. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 96/2004 (OJ L 15, 22.1.2004, p. 3).

2

---
PUBLIC LAW 104–136—APR. 30, 1996 110 STAT. 1323

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 869:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–365 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 141 (1995): Dec. 5, considered and passed House.

Vol. 142 (1996): Apr. 16, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–136

104th Congress

An Act

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 125

Market Street in Youngstown, Ohio, as the ‘‘Thomas D. Lambros Federal Building

and United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 125 Market Street in Youngstown, Ohio, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Thomas D. Lambros Federal Building and United

States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building and

United States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

to be a reference to the ‘‘Thomas D. Lambros Federal Building

and United States Courthouse’’.

Approved April 30, 1996.

Apr. 30, 1996

[H.R. 869]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      91,791,371
<SECURITIES>                                25,360,895
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,371,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,214,361
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,546,464
<PP&E>                                      25,925,165
<DEPRECIATION>                            (16,817,060)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             135,917,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,778,373
<BONDS>                                    115,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       133,802
<OTHER-SE>                                 162,435,281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               135,917,616
<SALES>                                     15,012,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,012,117
<CGS>                                       12,296,689
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,296,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            43,628,651
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,092,268)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (33,620,955)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (39,820,955)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (39,820,955)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.00)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23229-23230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09743]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 23

[Docket No. CE277; Special Conditions No. 23-217-SC]

Special Conditions: Honda Aircraft Company Model HA-420 Hondajet, 
Protection of Systems for High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF); 
Withdrawal

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is withdrawing a previously published notice granting 
special conditions for the Honda Aircraft Company model HA-420 jet 
airplane. We are withdrawing Special Condition No. 23-217-SC through 
mutual agreement with Honda Aircraft Company.

DATES: This special condition published on December 10, 2007 (72 FR 
69572) is withdrawn, effective April 27, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Brady, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone (816) 
329-4132; facsimile (816) 329-4090, email james.brady@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 10, 2007, the FAA published Special Condition No. 23-
217-SC for the Honda Aircraft Company new model HA-420. The HA-420 is a 
four to five passenger (depending on configuration), two crew, 
lightweight business jet with a 43,000-foot service ceiling and a 
maximum takeoff weight of 9963 pounds. The airplane is powered by two 
GE-Honda Aero Engines (GHAE) HF-120 turbofan engines mounted above the 
wings towards the aft of the airplane.
    On October 11, 2006, Honda Aircraft Company applied for a type 
certificate for their new Model HA-420 aircraft. On October 10, 2013, 
Honda Aircraft Company requested an extension with an effective 
application date of October 1, 2013. This extension changed the type 
certification basis to amendment 23-62.

Reason for Withdrawal

    The FAA is withdrawing Special Condition No. 23-217-SC because 
Honda Aircraft Company elected to revise the model HA-420 certification 
basis to amendment 23-62. This amendment contains adequate and 
appropriate standards for HIRF.
    The authority citation for this Special Condition withdrawal is 49 
U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17; and 14 CFR 
11.38 and 11.19.

Conclusion

    Withdrawal of this special condition does not preclude the FAA from 
issuing another notice on the subject matter in the future or 
committing the agency to any future course of action.

[[Page 23230]]

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on April 20, 2015.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-09743 Filed 4-24-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
DWS U.S. Bond Index Fund


Supplement to the currently effective Statement of Additional Information
("SAI") for the above-listed fund.

The following information replaces paragraph (10) in the nonfundamental policy
portion of the "Investment Restrictions" section of the fund's SAI:

(10)     with respect to the Equity 500 Index Fund and U.S. Bond Index Fund:
         acquire securities of registered open-end investment companies or
         registered unit investment trusts in reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(F) or
         12(d)(1)(G) of the 1940 Act.







               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference



May 30, 2008

                                                              [DWS SCUDDER LOGO]
                                                             Deutsche Bank Group
No. 72-893.

#### Fox et ux. *v.*Norberg, Tax Administrator.

Appeal from Super. Ct. R. I. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SRA International, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Renato A. DiPentima, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated: September 9, 2005



/s/    RENATO A.
DIPENTIMARenato A. DiPentima President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

AL-02 County Road 70 & 71 Resurfacing U.S. Forest Service - 

Bankhead National Forest Lawrence County Lawrence

AL-03 County Road 700 (Shell Field 

Road) Resurfacing

Department of Defense - 

Fort Rucker Military 

Reservation

Coffee County Coffee

AL-04 Riverwalk Connection Multi-Use Path 

Construction

Department of Defense - 

Maxwell Air Force Base

City of 

Montgomery Montgomery

AL-06 Spillway Falls Park Access Road Resurfacing

U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers - Black Warrior & 

Tombigbee Rivers Project

Marengo County Marengo

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Alabama Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its initial, 

multiyear Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Alabama FLAP are listed below in no particular order and 

Alabama Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2013-2014

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local 

Agency partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. Funding for these projects is not 

guaranteed. Funding beyond 2014 is dependent on reauthorization of the Access Program by Congress. The Alabama PDC does not have a firm 

date for the next call for projects under the Access Program, but another call is anticipated within the next year. If you have any questions 

please contact David Payne, Access Program Manager, at 571-434-1543 or email at David.Payne@dot.gov.
256 La. 321

#### Samuel D. MILBURN v. Henry A. REID, Sheriff of Calcasieu Parish.

No. 50689.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 22, 1970.

In re: Samuel D. Milburn applying for writs of certiorari and mandamus.

Writs refused. It has never been the law of this State that a person charged with a misdemeanor is entitled as a matter of right to court-appointed counsel.
#### Joshua L. GREEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-555.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 25, 1973.

Joshua L. Green, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on con*22sideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order of judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

Nos. 22-185C

(Filed: March 31, 2022)

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

***************************************

NAVTEJ SINGH, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

v. *

*

THE UNITED STATES, *

*

Defendant. *

*

***************************************

ORDER 

Mr. Navtej Singh, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action against the United 

States of America. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must either 

pay $402.00 in fees—a $350.00 filing fee plus a $52.00 administrative fee—or request 

authorization to proceed without prepayment of fees by submitting a signed 

application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. 

Mr. Singh submitted his complaint without the filing fees or a completed IFP 

application. In an order dated February 24, 2022, this Court ordered Mr. Singh to 

either pay the $402.00 in required fees or submit an IFP application within thirty 

days. See Order (ECF 6). To date, Mr. Singh has failed to comply with this Court’s 

previous order. 

This Court may dismiss a case for failure to prosecute when the plaintiff “fails 

... to comply with these rules or a court order.” RCFC 41(b). Here, Plaintiff’s failure

to comply with an order directing him to pay the filing fee or establish grounds for 

proceeding in forma pauperis justifies dismissal. See, e.g., Bryant v. United States, 

618 F. App’x 683, 686 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (“If a party fails to pay the requisite filing fee, 

despite adequate notice and ample opportunity to do so, the Claims Court acts within 

its discretion when it dismisses the action.”). As a result, this action is dismissed 

without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Rule 41 of the Rules of the United 

States Court of Federal Claims. 
- 2 -

The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Stephen S. Schwartz

STEPHEN S. SCHWARTZ

Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2



             PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 1350
                            (furnished but not filed)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of ViaVid Broadcasting Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian
Kathler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Brian Kathler




Brian Kathler
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2004


                                       30
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Almeca BARRETT.

No. 61654.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 1978.

Milton P. Masinter, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________

16-10040

Non-Argument Calendar

_________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00309-SDM-EAJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALBERT STANLEY MELVIN, 

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(August 21, 2017)

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government=s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver 

in Appellant=s plea agreement is GRANTED. United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 

Case: 16-10040 Date Filed: 08/21/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was 

made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 

1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to 

appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).

Case: 16-10040 Date Filed: 08/21/2017 Page: 2 of 2
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-331 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Status of Forces 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and POLAND 

Signed at Warsaw December 11, 2009 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
POLAND 

 Defense: Status of Forces 

 Agreement signed at Warsaw December 11, 2009; 

 Entered into force March 31, 2010. 































































NOTE: No text appers on this page.
#### Jane R. STEWART and J. Parks Stewart, her husband, Appellants, v. Freddie Laverne GILLIAM and Robert Leo Bradley, Appellees.

No. 71-57.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 24, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; George E. Adams, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### J. J. WIGGINS and Flora E. Wiggins, his wife, Appellants, v. Clinton A. (Bill) MORRISON a/k/a C. A. Morrison, and Dorothy Morrison, his wife, Appellees.

No. 70-83.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 16, 1970.

Thomas K. Boardman, of Sapp & Boardman, Immokalee, for appellants.

No appearance for appellees.

*185MANN, Judge.

When two people are trying to exclude the Internal Revenue Service from its lawful knowledge of their business it is difficult for state court judges to unravel some of their transactions. What is clear is that Morrison conveyed his home to Wiggins by warranty deed. Wiggins said he bought it. Morrison said that the transaction was a loan but because he was in tax trouble, Wiggins suggested an absolute conveyance to keep Internal Revenue from tying the property up.

Wiggins sued, after some years, in ejectment. Morrison answered, pleading that the transaction was a loan which had been repaid, but did not counterclaim for a judgment settling the issues of title and payment. The pleadings and proceedings at trial are too casual for sound appellate review. The trial judge’s finding that the deed was intended by both as a mortgage and not a deed is supported by the evidence. His finding that the mortgage was paid off is supported only by Morrison's statement, “I paid the mortgage off” and some inconclusive talk about who owed whom what. This is insufficient. Meres v. Clayton, 1929, 97 Fla. 329, 120 So. 766. Cf. First National Bank and Trust Co. of Eustis v. Boyd, Fla.App.1960, 124 So.2d 27.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for entry of judgment for defendant in the ejectment action. Prior to entry of such judgment the parties shall be given leave to amend their pleadings so that the issues relating to a foreclosure of the mortgage, raised informally, may be fully tried in the same cause. In such an event the judgment entered shall be a partial final summary judgment. See F.R.C. P. 1.170(f), 1.190, 30 F.S.A.

LILES, A. C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
# I ( 

# .. 20. Mattack, A. pB**Mt~ement** and Titration. MacMillan. 1961. P•**~7.** Ntv York,



# c 

# ....

I 

# 0 U1


# ...... I 

# I