UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 10-K

|(Mark One)                                  |                                                                                         
|------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ý                                           | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934    
|For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
|or                                         
|o                                           | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|For the transition period from
 to         

Commission file number 0-22616

---

NTL Incorporated(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)                 |  | 52-1822078(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|909 Third Avenue, Suite 2863
New York, New York(Address of Principal Executive Office) |  | 10022(Zip Code)                            
|110 East 59th Street
New York, New York(Former address of Principal Executive Office)  |  | 10022(Zip Code)                            
|(212) 906-8440(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)                    

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

|Title of each classCommon Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock |  | Name of each exchange on which registeredNasdaq National Market
Nasdaq National Market
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to
this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes ý    No o

As of March 10, 2004, there were 86,999,281 shares of the Registrant's common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued and outstanding, excluding shares of the
Registrant's common stock issuable upon the exercise of Series A Warrants to purchase 10,313,158 shares of the Registrant's common stock.

The
aggregate market value of the Registrant's voting stock held by non-affiliates as of March 10, 2004, based on the closing price for the Registrant's common stock on the
Nasdaq National Market on such date, was approximately $4.1 billion.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent
to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a
court. Yes ý    No o



---



TABLE OF CONTENTS

|                                                                             |  |                                                                                       |  | Page
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|PART I                                                                       |  |                                                                                       |  |     
|Item 1.                                                                      |  | Business                                                                              |  | 7   
|Item 2.                                                                      |  | Properties                                                                            |  | 44  
|Item 3.                                                                      |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                     |  | 45  
|Item 4.                                                                      |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                   |  | 46  
|PART II                                                                      |  |                                                                                       |  |     
|Item 5.                                                                      |  | Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters             |  | 47  
|Item 6.                                                                      |  | Selected Financial Data                                                               |  | 48  
|Item 7.                                                                      |  | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation  |  | 51  
|Item 7A.                                                                     |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                            |  | 82  
|Item 8.                                                                      |  | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data                                           |  | 83  
|Item 9.                                                                      |  | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures |  | 86  
|Item 9A.                                                                     |  | Controls and Procedures                                                               |  | 86  
|PART III                                                                     |  |                                                                                       |  |     
|Item 10.                                                                     |  | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant                                    |  | 87  
|Item 11.                                                                     |  | Executive Compensation                                                                |  | 92  
|Item 12.                                                                     |  | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management                        |  | 103 
|Item 13.                                                                     |  | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions                                        |  | 109 
|Item 14.                                                                     |  | Principal Accountant Fees and Services                                                |  | 114 
|PART IV                                                                      |  |                                                                                       |  |     
|Item 15.                                                                     |  | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K                      |  | 115 
|Signatures                                                                   |  | 122                                                                                  
|Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules |  | F-1                                                                                  

2

---

"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:

Various statements contained in this document constitute "forward-looking statements" as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Words like "believe," "anticipate," "should," "intend," "plan," "will," "expects," "estimates," "projects," "positioned," "strategy," and similar expressions identify these forward-looking
statements, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements or industry results to be materially different from
those contemplated whether expressed or implied, by these forward-looking statements. These factors include:



We
assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements contained in this annual report to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in factors affecting these
statements.

3

---



PART I    NTL CORPORATE STRUCTURE

NTL's Completed Restructuring

On January 10, 2003, we emerged from reorganization under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. As part of the plan of reorganization, which we
refer to as the Plan, we substantially reduced our indebtedness. In addition, since the completion of the Plan, we have enhanced our management team. We have a new chairmanJames F.
Mooney, a new chief executive officerSimon P. Duffy, and a new chief financial officerScott E. Schubert. Prior to joining us, Mr. Mooney was the executive vice
president and chief operating officer of Nextel Communications Inc., Mr. Duffy was the chief financial officer of Orange SA and Mr. Schubert was the chief financial officer of
WilTel Communications.

Pursuant
to the Plan, our former parent NTL Europe, Inc., formerly known as NTL Incorporated, and its subsidiaries and affiliates were split into two separate groups, with us and
NTL Europe, Inc. each emerging as independent public companies. We were renamed "NTL Incorporated" and became the holding company for the former NTL group's principal UK and Ireland assets. NTL
Europe, Inc. became the holding company for the former NTL group's continental European and various other assets. All of the outstanding securities of NTL Europe, Inc. and some of its
subsidiaries, including us, were cancelled. We issued shares of our common stock and Series A warrants and NTL Europe, Inc. issued shares of its common stock and preferred stock to
various former creditors and stockholders. As a result, we are no longer affiliated with NTL Europe, Inc.

Historical Structure of the Company

We were incorporated in 1993 as a Delaware corporation and continued as a publicly-traded holding company until February 1999. From February 1999
until January 10, 2003, the effective date of the Plan, or the Effective Date, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of NTL (Delaware), Inc., a Delaware
corporation, which was incorporated in February 1999, to effect a reorganization into a holding company structure under Section 251(g) of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The
holding company structure was implemented to pursue opportunities outside of the UK and Ireland, and was accomplished through a merger. Our stockholders at the time became stockholders of the new
holding company, NTL (Delaware), Inc., and we became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the new holding company. The new holding company took the name NTL Incorporated until May 2000 when it
was changed to NTL (Delaware), Inc., its current name.

In
May 2000 another new holding company structure was implemented in connection with the acquisition of the residential assets of Cable & Wireless Communications plc,
referred to in this annual report as CWC (the operations acquired from CWC are called ConsumerCo), and was similarly accomplished through a merger. The stockholders of NTL (Delaware), Inc.
became stockholders of the new holding company, and NTL (Delaware), Inc. became a subsidiary of the new holding company, and we remained a subsidiary of NTL (Delaware), Inc., referred to
in this annual report as NTL Delaware. The new holding company then took the name NTL Incorporated, which remained its name until the Effective Date of the Plan, at which time its name was changed to
NTL Europe, Inc., referred to in this annual report as NTL Europe. On February 21, 2001, NTL Europe contributed the assets of ConsumerCo to us.

We
remained a subsidiary of NTL Europe and NTL Delaware until the Effective Date, at which time NTL Europe and its wholly owned subsidiary NTL Delaware were separated from us pursuant to
the Plan and we took the name NTL Incorporated.

We
conduct our operations through direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. Our principal executive office is located at 909 Third Avenue, Suite 2863, New York, New York 10022, and
our telephone number is (212) 906-8440. Our World Wide Web site is www.ntl.com and the investor

4

---

relations
section of our web site is located at www.ntl.com/locales/gb/en/investors/companyinfo/default.asp. We make available free of charge, through the investor relations section of our web site,
annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K as soon as reasonably practical after they are filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Our filings are also available to the public at the web site maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission, www.sec.gov.

Summary Corporate Structure

The following chart shows on a condensed basis, the corporate structure of NTL through which our operations are conducted. As of December 31, 2003 it does
not show our operating or other intermediate companies.

GRAPHIC

---

Exchange rates

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, period average and period end noon buying rate in the City of New York for cable
transfers as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York expressed as US dollars per £1.00. The noon buying rate of the UK pound on March 8, 2004
was $1.85 per £1.00.

|Year Ended December 31,      |  | Period End |  | Average(1) |  | High |  | Low 
|---------------------------- |  | ---------- |  | ---------- |  | ---- |  | ----
|1999                         |  | 1.62       |  | 1.61       |  | 1.68 |  | 1.55
|2000                         |  | 1.49       |  | 1.51       |  | 1.65 |  | 1.40
|2001                         |  | 1.45       |  | 1.44       |  | 1.50 |  | 1.37
|2002                         |  | 1.61       |  | 1.51       |  | 1.61 |  | 1.41
|2003                         |  | 1.78       |  | 1.64       |  | 1.78 |  | 1.55
|2004 (through March 8, 2004) |  | 1.85       |  | 1.84       |  | 1.90 |  | 1.79

---

5

---

The
above rates may differ from the actual rates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and other financial information appearing in this annual report on
Form 10-K. Our inclusion of these exchange rates is not meant to suggest that the UK pound amounts actually represent these US dollar amounts or that these amounts could have
been converted into US dollars at any particular rate, if at all.

Unless
we otherwise indicate, all UK pound amounts as of December 31, 2003 are translated to US dollars at an exchange rate of $1.7842 to £1.00, and all
amounts disclosed for the year ended December 31, 2003 are based on an average exchange rate of $1.6348 to £1.00. All amounts disclosed as of December 31, 2002 are based on
an exchange rate of $1.6095 to £1.00, and all amounts disclosed for the year ended December 31, 2002 are based on an average exchange rate of $1.5025 to £1.00. All
amounts disclosed as of December 31, 2001 are based on an exchange rate of $1.4543 to £1.00, and all amounts disclosed for the year ended December 31, 2001 are based on an
average exchange rate of $1.4392 to £1.00. US dollar amounts for any individual quarter are determined by multiplying the UK pound financial result for the period from
January 1 to the end of the current quarter by the average exchange rate for the same period and subtracting from this total the US dollar converted financial result for the previous
quarter of that fiscal year as computed above. The variation between the 2002 and 2003 exchange rates has impacted the dollar comparisons significantly.

The
assets and liabilities of our UK and Ireland subsidiaries have been translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates, and revenues and expenses have been
translated at the average rates for the respective years.

6

---



Item 1.    Business

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

On March 8, 2004, we entered into a commitment letter with Credit Suisse First Boston, Deutsche Bank, AG London, Goldman Sachs International and
Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc relating to a £2.425 billion new credit facility. The commitment by these lenders is subject to customary conditions as well as the issuance of
high yield notes the proceeds of which, together with the proceeds from the new credit facility, will be sufficient to repay in full our existing senior credit facilities and our existing notes issued
by Diamond Holdings and NTL Triangle. The aim of any new financing is to extend the maturity of our indebtedness and to reduce our weighted average cost of debt. We cannot provide any assurance that
this refinancing transaction will be consummated.

ABOUT NTL INCORPORATED

We are a leading broadband and communications services company in the UK and the Republic of Ireland based on total residential subscriber numbers. We provide our
services to our customers through five reportable segments.



Our
reportable segments are supported by various central shared services, including ntl: networks, which manages our UK national network. Other shared services include finance, IT and
human resources. ntl: Ireland relies upon these central shared services to a lesser extent than our other reportable segments.

For
the year ended December 31, 2003, our consolidated revenues by reportable segment were as follows:

|Line of Business |       | Revenue |         | Percentage of
Consolidated Revenues |     
|---------------- | ----- | ------- | ------- | ----------------------------------- | ----
|
|ntl: home        |       | $       | 2,442.5 |                                     | 67.0
|ntl: business    |       |         | 461.2   |                                     | 12.7
|ntl: broadcast   |       |         | 439.2   |                                     | 12.0
|ntl: carriers    |       |         | 183.8   |                                     | 5.0 
|ntl: Ireland     |       |         | 118.5   |                                     | 3.3 
|                 |       |         |         |                                     |     
|                 | Total |         | $       | 3,645.2                             |     
|                 |       |         |         |                                     |     

7

---

Business Strategy

Our management team is focusing our efforts on improving the overall performance of our business. We are accomplishing this in a number of ways, including
through:



8

---



Our Businesses

Our operations expanded significantly between 1998 and 2000, primarily through acquisitions. Since 2001, we have focused on restructuring, integrating these
operations and improving the services we offer.

ntl: home

Our ntl: home segment provides residential telephone, cable television and Internet services in the UK as well as wholesale Internet access solutions to UK ISPs.
We are the largest direct provider of residential broadband services in the UK. We refer to each service we provide as a revenue generating unit, or RGU. For example, if we provided one customer with
broadband Internet and telephone services, this customer would represent two RGUs. As of December 31, 2003, we had approximately 2.9 million ntl: home customers, representing
approximately 5.5 million RGUs. As of December 31, 2003, our customer penetration rate was approximately 36.9%. The customer penetration rate measures the number of customers for our
services divided by the number of homes within our service area that can potentially be served by our network with minimal connection costs. For the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: home
revenues increased by 14.2% to $2,442.5 million from $2,139.0 million in 2002, and expressed in UK pounds revenues increased by 4.9% to £1,494.1 million from
£1,423.7 million during the same period.

During
2003, ntl: home added 181,500 net new customers compared with a net loss of 174,300 customers in 2002. This achievement is primarily the result of our efforts since 2002 to
improve the pricing and packaging of our services, improve our customer service experience and re-build a sales force that had previously been scaled back. Our gross activations increased
to 557,800 in 2003 from 292,800 in 2002. In addition, our deactivations declined from 467,100, or a 16.8% average customer churn rate in 2002 to 376,300, or a 13.4% average customer churn rate in
2003.

ntl: home Services

Bundling advantage

In addition to providing our customers with better service, we also continue our efforts to cross-sell or up-sell our services to existing
customers. As of December 31, 2003, we had approximately 949,200 broadband Internet subscribers. Our packaging and pricing are designed to encourage our

9

---

customers
to use multiple services like dual telephone and broadband Internet access, dual telephone and narrowband Internet access, dual telephone and television, or triple telephone, television and
Internet access. For example, our Family Pack bundle offers over 100 television channels and a telephone line rental, and is subscribed for by approximately 70% of our DTV customers. In addition, we
offer subscribers "two-for-one" incentives, like a free basic DTV subscription (for 12 months) with the purchase of our 24 hour unlimited UK call package.

We
believe that we are uniquely positioned in our service areas to use bundling to increase our customer base, reduce our customer churn rate and increase our profitability. As of
December 31, 2003, over 70% of our customers received multiple services from us, and each of our ntl: home customers represented on average approximately two RGUs. In our service areas, we are
the only service provider that can provide the full range of services that we offer. The table below shows other typical service providers who offer their services in our areas:

|                 |  | ntl: home service bundling
|---------------- |  | --------------------------
|
|Telephone        |  | 3                         
|Broadband        |  | 3                         
|Dial Up          |  | 3                         
|Television       |  | 3                         
|                 |  |                           
|Bundled Services |  | 3                         

---

Broadband Internet access

We were the first communications provider in the UK to launch a high-speed cable modem Internet service. This service links customers of our local
cable networks to the Internet at up to 20 times the speed possible over standard telephone lines. Broadband Internet usage by residential customers remains a relatively new and undeveloped market. As
of December 31, 2003, out of approximately 6.8 million homes currently able to receive broadband Internet service from us, we had approximately 949,200 residential broadband customers, a
penetration rate of 14.0%.

Unlike
standard dial-up Internet, our broadband Internet service is an "always on" service, eliminating logging-on delays and the need to log off while using the
telephone. We offer three tiers of broadband Internet services to our customers: 150Kb/s, 600Kb/s and 1024Kb/s, or 1Mb/s. Our 600Kb/s service provides an advantage over competing digital subscriber
line, or DSL, services, which are generally offered at speeds of approximately 512Kb/s.

Cable television

We offer both ATV and DTV to our customers. We have a number of ATV packages, which can be supplemented with premium channels and/or pay per view services. We
also offer a wide range of digital services, including access to over 150 channels, advanced interactive features and a range of pay

10

---

per
view services. The selection of cable channels that we currently offer to our customers varies based on the particular area in which the service is provided. This variation is a result of the
different channels offered by the various cable networks we acquired over the past several years and will decrease as DTV continues to be rolled out. In addition to offering many of the popular
channels available on BSkyB's satellite platform, we also offer to all of our digital customers, through our joint venture with Telewest Communications plc, or Telewest, a cable-only
movie, sport and special events pay per view television service called "Front Row." Front Row represented the first alternative in the UK to BSkyB in the provision of films and sports events through
pay television.

Our
DTV technology enables a significant range of interactive services to be delivered that make use of the always-on return path. Examples of interactive services include
game playing, television email and access to news, entertainment and information services from an on-screen menu.

As
of December 31, 2003, we provided cable television services to approximately 2.0 million residential customers, of which approximately 1.3 million received our
DTV service and approximately 693,600 received our ATV service. This represents a decrease since December 31, 2002 of approximately 31,700 residential television customers, which includes an
increase of approximately 101,000 DTV service customers and a decrease of approximately 132,700 ATV service customers. As of December 31, 2003, the penetration rate for our residential cable
television services was approximately 26.0%.

Telephone

We provide local, national and international telephone services to our residential customers. We tier our product offering with attractive pricing that includes
"Talk Plans" that enable customers to make unlimited local and national calls for a fixed monthly fee in addition to the standard line rental. We believe that this combination of product tiering and
pricing adds value to our offerings and enhances our market competitiveness. As of December 31, 2003, we provided telephone service to approximately 2.5 million residential customers, an
increase of approximately 113,500 telephone service customers since December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2003, the penetration rate for our residential telephone services was
approximately 33.5%.

Additional services

We provide wholesale Internet access solutions, including network services, call center operations and customer provisioning and billing to three of the leading
UK ISPs, AOL, Virgin.net and Tesco.net. As of December 31, 2003, we had seven wholesale Internet customers. We also provide dial-up Internet services to approximately 407,900
customers as of December 31, 2003, a decrease of 35,500 customers since December 31, 2002. In addition, we provide Internet access to customers who are not directly connected to our
network. As of December 31, 2003, we had approximately 117,700 of these indirect access customers, an increase of approximately 48,800 since December 31, 2002.

ntl: home Strategy

Our network infrastructure enables us to offer existing and new customers within our service areas bundled services that include telephone, television and
Internet services. We continue to focus on increasing customer penetration of relatively higher margin services like broadband Internet and telephone services through our competitively-priced bundled
packages. We believe this will enable us to increase customer use of our services, thereby increasing our RGUs and average revenues per customer. From time to time, we have discussed with some of our
suppliers of television programming content, including BSkyB, more favorable pricing or bundling terms. We and BSkyB have reached agreement on the main principles of a marketing incentive scheme that
will provide us with improved economic terms based on increased sales of BSkyB's premium movie and sports channels. Conclusion

11

---

of
this deal is subject to certain matters, including the negotiation of a long form carriage agreement. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any changes to the terms of our current agreement
will be made. We also continue to focus on improving our customer service in order to minimize our customer churn rate while continuing to decrease our operating costs. We expect to improve customer
call center efficiencies, provide customers with on-line access to their accounts and improve overall customer satisfaction with the integration of our different billing systems to a
common platform.

ntl: home Customer Statistics

The following table illustrates our residential customer statistics as of December 31, 2003 and 2002:

|                    |                           | As of December 31, |        
|------------------- | ------------------------- | ------------------ | -------
|
|
|Homes Passed        |                           | 8,404.1            |        
|Homes Marketable(1) |                           |                    |        
|                    | Telephone                 |                    | 7,548.0
|                    | ATV                       |                    | 7,779.8
|                    | DTV                       |                    | 7,289.8
|                    | Broadband Internet        |                    | 6,762.0
|                    |                           |                    |        
|Customers           |                           |                    |        
|                    | Single RGU                |                    | 829.9  
|                    | Dual RGU(2)               |                    | 1,446.4
|                    | Triple RGU(3)             |                    | 591.6  
|                    |                           |                    |        
|                    | Total                     |                    | 2,867.9
|                    |                           |                    |        
|                    | Telephone Customers       |                    | 2,525.0
|                    | Television Customers      |                    |        
|                    |                           | DTV                |        
|                    |                           | ATV                |        
|                    | Master Antenna Television |                    | 21.9   
|                    |                           |                    |        
|                    |                           | Total              |        
|                    |                           |                    |        
|                    | Internet Customers        |                    |        
|                    | Dial-Up (metered)         |                    | 158.0  
|                    | Dial-up (unmetered)       |                    | 249.9  
|                    | DTV Access                |                    | 12.8   
|                    | Broadband                 |                    | 949.2  
|                    |                           |                    |        
|                    | Total                     |                    | 1,369.9
|                    |                           |                    |        
|RGUs(5)             |                           |                    |        
|                    | Telephone                 |                    | 2,525.0
|                    | Television                |                    | 2,023.6
|                    | Broadband Internet        |                    | 949.2  
|                    |                           |                    |        
|                    | Total                     |                    | 5,497.8
|                    |                           |                    |        
|RGUs/Customers      |                           | 1.92               |        
|Penetration(6)      |                           |                    |        
|                    | Telephone                 |                    | 33.5   
|                    | Television                |                    | 26.0   
|                    | Broadband                 |                    | 14.0   
|                    | Customer                  |                    | 36.9   

12

---

|                      |                                                  | As of December 31, |        
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | ------------------ | -------
|
|
|Customer/RGU Movement |                                                  |                    |        
|                      | Opening Customers (at September 30)              |                    | 2,809.5
|                      | Gross Adds                                       |                    | 153.9  
|                      | Disconnects(7)                                   |                    | (95.5  
|                      | MATV included from December 31, 2002            |                    |       
|                      |                                                  |                    |        
|                      | Closing Customers (at December 31, 2003)         |                    | 2,867.9
|                      |                                                  |                    |        
|                      | Quarterly Customer Adds                          |                    | 58.4   
|                      | Quarterly RGU Adds                               |                    | 133.7  
|                      | % Customer Churn (Quarterly churn annualized)(8) |                    | 13.2   
|Off-Net Telephone     |                                                  |                    |        
|                      | Telephone                                        |                    | 20.6   
|                      | Telephone and Internet                           |                    | 117.7  
|                      |                                                  |                    |        
|                      | Total                                            |                    | 138.3  
|                      |                                                  |                    |        

---

ntl: business

ntl: business provides a wide range of voice, data and Internet based communications services for our business customers. ntl: business targets large businesses,
public sector organizations and SMEs. We generally divide our customers into three categories based on revenues generated or revenues expected to be generated by that customer:



13

---



This
segmentation of existing customers enables divisional directors to devote resources and provide levels of service appropriate to levels of customer revenues. We primarily focus on
our Tier 1 and Tier 2 customers. For the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: business revenues decreased by 1.8% to $461.2 million from $469.8 million in 2002, and revenues
expressed in UK pounds decreased by 9.8% to £282.1 million from £312.7 million. For the year ended December 31, 2003, Tier 1 and Tier 2 customers accounted
for a majority of ntl: business's revenues, with Tier 1 customers accounting for a significant portion of those revenues. Our customers include Cambridgeshire County Council, Hertfordshire County
Council, Blue Arrow, Fujitsu, HSS Hire Shops and Glasgow City Council.

ntl: business Services

Voice Services

Business Exchange Lines

Our business exchange lines provide our business customers with analog telephone services that connect to customer telephone handsets or private automatic branch
exchanges, or PABXs. Revenues for this service are derived from service installation, line rental and usage charges.

Business Line ISDN 30

Our Business Line ISDN 30 service delivers 30 digital exchange lines over a single physical access link. The exchange lines may be used for voice or data
applications or a mix of both. The number of digital exchange lines is sized to a customer's needs. Revenues for this service are derived from service installation, line rental and usage charges.

Centrex

Our single and multi-site Centrex solutions provide customers with the facilities of a PABX without the need to invest in the provision and
maintenance of a local PABX. Telephone calls between users within a building or in different buildings are handled through our network but appear to the user to be transferred through a local PABX.
Revenues for this service are derived from installation, equipment rental, line rental and call charges.

Data Services

Leased Lines

Our leased line services provide high quality dedicated connections between two customer locations. Customers use leased lines for voice, data and video
applications, and for forming the basis of private networks. Service speeds are available at 2Mb/s, 10Mb/s, 34Mb/s, 45Mb/s, 100Mb/s, 155Mb/s and 1000Mb/s or 1Gb/s. Revenues for this service are
derived from service installation and recurring rental charges based on distance.

Virtual Private Network

We provide virtual private connections between customer locations. Virtual private networks deliver several connections over a single access link. This provides
the benefits of a dedicated private network at a lower cost. Revenues for this service are derived from installation, access circuit rental and virtual connection rental charges.

14

---

Structured Cabling

We provide in-building structured cabling services which include design, installation and project management of cable installations and upgrades.
Revenues for this service are determined on a project by project basis.

LAN Services

We provide design, installation and maintenance services for our customers' local area networks, or LANs. Revenues for this service are determined on a project by
project basis.

Internet

Dedicated Internet Access

We provide high speed dedicated Internet access to organizations that support web services from their own locations as well as organizations that have heavy
demands for access to the Internet. Because we own our network, we can provide competitively-priced Internet access at higher speeds. In addition, we also provide cable modem access to our smaller
customers. Our pricing is based on installation charges and recurring rental charges that vary based on the speed of access.

ntl: business Strategy

Our network infrastructure passes within 200 meters of more than 570,000 business premises in the UK. We use our network infrastructure and brand to offer voice,
data and Internet services to these business customers. We are currently focused on our existing business customer base with an emphasis on providing them a full set of services at competitive prices.
We have also undertaken a detailed review of our cost base in this segment, with a view to right-sizing the organization for our customer base and improving profitability. For example, ntl: business
decreased its headcount from approximately 2,100 employees in December 2002 to approximately 1,300 employees in December 2003. We plan to return to selective, capital-efficient customer
growth in 2004.

ntl: broadcast

ntl: broadcast provides site leasing, broadcast transmission, satellite, media, public safety communications and other network services. We use our wireless
communication and broadcast
transmission infrastructure in the UK and our facilities management expertise to provide our customers with enhanced services. Our ntl: broadcast segment has approximately 1,100 customers, including
the leading UK mobile wireless operators, all major commercial television and radio broadcasters and public safety organizations like the police, fire and ambulance services across the UK. For the
year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: broadcast revenues increased by 13.6% to $439.2 million from $386.6 million in 2002, and revenues expressed in UK pounds increased by 4.4% to
£268.6 million from £257.3 million in 2002. This growth has been driven in part by the continued rollout of digital radio services and the growth achieved in
public safety services.

We
also develop new service offerings to meet the needs of our customers and to drive the growth of our business. For example, over the last few years, we designed and implemented
digital terrestrial television and digital audio broadcasting networks for many of our UK broadcast customers. ntl: broadcast is also using its core assets and competencies to provide innovative
solutions to enhance the mobile coverage of our customers. Our solutions are based on technology that enables low power antennae to be discreetly placed away from the centralized transmission
equipment in order to bring environmental and commercial benefits to mobile operators, local authorities and residents. Furthermore, with the recent migration from analog to digital systems in the
public safety market, we have developed an integrated control room solution for the police market. We also developed and

15

---

deployed
a wireless call out system for emergency services that is being used by the Royal National Lifeboat Institution in the UK and the Republic of Ireland.

ntl: broadcast Services

Site Leasing Services

We have the second largest independent portfolio of wireless towers and sites available for lease in the UK. Our network includes most of the major population
centers and highways in the UK. As of December 31, 2003, we had a UK wireless infrastructure network of 2,222 multi-user tower sites and undeveloped sites. We own, lease, manage,
license, share and have conditional options for or access to 1,526 UK tower, rooftop and third party-owned sites and have limited rights to access or acquire approximately 696 undeveloped sites. Our
primary site leasing business is the leasing of antenna space on our sites to a diverse range of wireless service providers, including providers of mobile telephone, paging, specialized mobile radio
and wireless local loop services. We have also developed a range of complementary services that use our tower expertise, including infrastructure services, site selection and acquisition, design and
construction, antenna installation, network planning and management and tower maintenance. Our site leasing contracts generally have a duration of
approximately 10 to 12 years. We also use the broadcast transmission sites of Crown Castle UK Limited, or Crown, a subsidiary of Crown Castle International Corp., pursuant to our reciprocal
sharing arrangement with Crown. See "Properties."

Second
generation, or 2G, wireless services have been the major driver of our growth to date, but we expect 3G wireless services to drive further revenue growth. During 2000, the UK
government awarded five national universal mobile telecommunications systems, or UMTS, licenses. Each of these licenses has a duration of 20 years, commencing January 2002. Under the
terms of these licenses, each operator is obligated to provide services to at least 80% of the UK population by December 2007. Construction of these networks commenced in 2001 and is expected
to generate further demand for suitable existing and new sites over the next few years.

The
growth of wireless communications has created a need for good cellular coverage in all commercial areas, including reliable wireless communications infrastructure inside buildings.
We believe this requires a new type of radio site that, unlike towers, will be located inside large public access buildings, like commercial spaces, transport hubs and shopping malls. We offer
wireless connectivity services that provide enhanced cellular coverage in high traffic areas. As of December 31, 2003, we had 59 wireless connectivity services agreements in place for large
public access buildings, 49 of which have been installed with shared coverage systems. Shared coverage systems allow us to carry the wireless traffic of more than one operator over our network at one
time.

We
provide site leasing and services to approximately 340 wireless operators, including all UK mobile telephone operators, major paging companies and many of the largest wireless voice
and data carriers.

Broadcast Transmission Services

We provide television and radio broadcast transmission services through our broadcast transmission infrastructure network in the UK. We are one of only two major
companies providing transmission sites and services to the broadcast industry in the UK. Unlike most broadcasters in the United States, we own and operate not only the towers, but also the broadcast
transmission infrastructure. Therefore, our broadcast customers rely on our network and package of integrated turn-key services to distribute and broadcast their content. This opportunity
has enabled us to develop strong relationships with our customers, which in turn has helped us to better understand their needs and to customize new services for them. Our broadcast customers
generally hold long-term licenses and enter into service agreements with us that typically last for 8 to 12 years.

16

---

We
provide analog and digital broadcast transmission services for national and regional television and radio broadcasters. Our ATV network provides coverage to almost all of the UK
population from approximately 1,200 sites for ITV, Channel 4/S4C and the majority of the UK for Five, formerly Channel 5. Our DTV network provides coverage reaching most of the UK population from 80
sites for two national DTV licensees. We provide these licensees with the DTV carriage services they need to broadcast their channels.

We
provide a range of services to radio broadcasters, including target service area planning, site location, system build, operations and maintenance. Our customer base for analog radio
includes over 200 commercial national, regional and local stations in the UK. Our radio business has grown significantly over recent years with the emergence of digital radio. As of
December 31, 2003, the UK government has licensed our affiliate, Digital One Limited, or Digital One, as the only national commercial digital radio licensee as well as 42 regional and local
commercial licensees. We have secured contracts to build the transmission and supporting network for Digital One as well as for 38 of these 42 regional and local licensees.

Satellite and Media Services

We provide satellite and media services in the UK and additional value-added services to generate incremental revenue. We own and operate satellite
up-linking facilities consisting of over 30 fixed satellite up-link dishes able to access over 50 satellites achieving global coverage through international partners and a
network of mobile and transportable up-links, management and systems. We provide our satellite customers with program and content distribution services for over 180 full-time
channels through satellite and fiber. In addition, we have facilities for value-added services like playout services, remote satellite news and full outside broadcast. Our full-time
satellite and playout services contracts generally have a duration of 3 to 5 years.

We
believe that our ability to offer a full range of services, including content gathering, distribution and transmission, is uncommon in the UK market. We have expanded our service
offerings over time to meet the growing needs of our customer base.

Our
satellite and media customers include programmers who own and operate packages of content or channels, news agencies, sports broadcasters and production companies. Our customers
include CNN, Turner Classic Movies, the Cartoon Network, the British Broadcasting Corporation, or the BBC, the Discovery Channel, QVC, the Associated Press Television Network and BSkyB.

Public Safety Services

We offer a wide range of communications services to public safety organizations. These services include the design and operation of radio networks, voice and data
services and the provision of support, maintenance and facility management services. We provide independent systems integration services, in both mobile radio communications and fixed-line
communication networks, making a wide range of technologies suitable and effective for the demanding public safety environment. We have introduced a new range of managed services for radio and
integrated communications technology. As a result, we are the UK's largest provider of radio communications managed services in the public safety sector. We have also secured new managed services
contracts to connect regional police forces to their new airwave digital network.

We
provide services to approximately 400 customers in the public safety sector. The Metropolitan Police in London is our largest public safety customer.

17

---

ntl: broadcast Strategy

Our strategy is to continue to build strong customer relationships with existing customers and to provide differentiated service offerings to both existing and
new customers. Capital investment within ntl: broadcast is largely focused on gaining new contracts. We seek to secure contracts that are long-term and cash generative.

In
the site leasing services area, our strategy is to maximize long-term site leasing contracts by increasing the number of mobile operators leasing our tower network. We
also provide coverage solutions in public buildings and cities in the UK using our fiber network.

Within
broadcast transmission and satellite and media services, our strategy is to be the technical out-sourcing partner of choice by providing
end-to-end connectivity services using our various products and infrastructure.

Within
the public safety sector, we manage communications systems that are mission critical for our public safety customers. As the public safety market transitions from analog to
digital systems, we are
providing transition management services and we are seeking to enter into new service contracts with our customers.

ntl: carriers

We provide external network services to national and international telecommunications operations by supplying fiber and transmission capacity to connect carriers
to national and local networks in the UK and Ireland. Our ntl: carriers segment has over 40 customers. Customers include fixed line and mobile telecommunications operators, like Orange Personal
Communications Services Limited, or Orange, and BT Global Services. For the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: carriers revenues increased by 2.3% to $183.8 million from
$179.7 million in 2002, and revenues expressed in UK pounds decreased by 6.0% to £112.4 million from £119.6 million.

Our
contracts with fixed line and mobile telecommunication operators, other than prepaid contracts, have an average duration of approximately five years. As of December 31, 2003,
there was an average of three years remaining on these contracts. Our largest ntl: carriers contract is a five-year, £235 million contract with Orange, which expires in
2006. This contract encompasses the design, construction and maintenance of network infrastructure for Orange. For the year ended December 31, 2003, revenues from services provided under this
contract were approximately £42.8 million. The contract is structured so that revenues are paid after each phase of construction is completed. Each individual phase is contracted
for a five-year period.

ntl: carriers Services

We provide external network services to national and international telecommunications operations in the UK and Ireland. We provide customers with a mix of dark
fiber, bandwidth, voice and support services, including equipment maintenance, monitoring and co-location. We also have connectivity to many of the UK's international cable landing
stations. These are shore-based locations where major submarine cable operators land their sea cables. The wholesale market saw the reorganization or bankruptcy in 2002 of many of the new entrant
operators, especially those companies whose focus had been on serving carriers. As a result of this, several customers that had signed contracts with us are no longer in business. While this will have
some effect on ntl: carriers revenues for 2004, most of our existing contracts are now with telecommunications companies with high volumes of retail traffic. Furthermore, our sales focus is on UK
telecommunications companies who service the retail rather than the wholesale markets.

18

---

We
supply core inter-switch capacity to UK mobile operators. We also supply connectivity between switch sites and local aggregation points from various mobile base stations. We have
commercial relationships with four of the five incumbent mobile operators in the UK.

ntl: carriers Strategy

We expect to continue serving the retail service provider marketplace through our strategy of providing high quality and competitively priced services, customized
to meet the needs of other telecommunications operators that need to expand their networks. We have migrated from building large networks to incrementally developing existing assets and new products.
In addition, we are benefiting from our customers' decision to lease additional capacity instead of constructing their own networks.

ntl: Ireland

We provide cable television and MMDS telephone, and Internet services in the Republic of Ireland. Our network service areas are located in Dublin, Galway and
Waterford. As of December 31, 2003, we had approximately 327,200 residential cable television customers in Ireland, a decrease of approximately 21,900 customers from December 31, 2002.
As of December 31, 2003, we had a 70.6% customer penetration rate in the 463,700 homes passed by our cable network. We also had approximately 4,050 business customers at December 31,
2003, a decrease of approximately 600 customers from December 31, 2002. For the year ended December 31, 2003, approximately 85% of our revenues were derived from residential customers
and approximately 15% of our revenues were derived from business customers. Telephone and Internet services currently contribute minimally to our residential revenues.

The
decrease in the number of residential customers is partially a result of our implementing a more rigorous credit policy that caused involuntary disconnections of some of our
customers. This did not have a significant overall impact on our consolidated results of operations or cash flow.

For
the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: Ireland revenues increased by 31.7% to $118.5 million from $90.0 million in 2002, revenues expressed in UK pounds
increased 21.0% to £72.5 million from £59.9 million, and revenues expressed in euros increased by 10.1% to €104.8 million from
€95.2 million.

ntl: Ireland Services

Cable Television

In the Republic of Ireland, we primarily offer ATV services within our three network service areas. Our analog service has a basic pack of 15 television channels.
It carries Irish and UK channels and a selection of quality satellite channels.

We
also offer DTV services in all of our network service areas. Our digital service packaging and pricing strategy is to encourage our analog subscribers to upgrade to the digital
service while retaining the basic analog entry package. We provide a basic DTV package offering a wide selection of digital channels with a low entry price point. If subscribers upgrade to digital,
encouraging subscription to additional services like digital premium sports, movie services and special interest channels can generate further revenues. As of December 31, 2003, we had 58,600
digital subscribers.

MMDS

We launched our digital MMDS service in April 2003. As of December 31, 2003, we had approximately 12,718 digital MMDS subscribers, as well as
approximately 4,377 analog MMDS subscribers. We plan to continue marketing our MMDS services.

19

---

Business Services

Our service offerings in the Republic of Ireland include business telecommunications and Internet services. We provide dedicated lines to business customers in
our Dublin network service area for Internet access with speeds ranging from 64Kb/s to 34Mb/s. We also sell leased lines in Dublin to customers requiring connectivity. One of our business objectives
is to achieve higher penetration within large corporate businesses based in the Dublin region.

ntl: Ireland Strategy

ntl: Ireland will focus on revenue growth per customer through continued migration of residential analog customers to our digital service and on a gradual
expansion of broadband services within our cable network. ntl: Ireland will also continue to focus on profitable growth and effective utilization of available network capacity for its business
customers.

Our Network

Our business is underpinned by significant investment by us and the companies we have acquired in our network infrastructure. We believe that we can successfully
grow our business by generating additional revenue from our existing assets with limited infrastructure upgrade and capital investment.

ntl:
networks operates, manages and maintains the core network infrastructure that transports our voice, Internet, data, optical and digital television services. The networks group
governs the architecture of all of our networks, plans and implements network capacity and operates our telephone, data and backbone transmission networks. It plans network strategy and creates
architecture for national and local access networks, setting technical standards for the whole network. It also manages our network security and the radio frequency spectrum on the broadband local
access network. There are two dedicated network sites.

Infrastructure

Our broadband communications network in the UK currently passes approximately 8.4 million homes. Our high-capacity two-way local
broadband fiber networks serve entire communities throughout our regional franchise areas. Our fiber optic cables also pass a significant number of businesses in these areas and are connected to
distribution points or nodes.

The
core network has a fiber backbone that is approximately 9,900 kilometers long. This includes 7,600 kilometers which are owned or operated by us and approximately 2,300 kilometers
which are leased fiber from other network owners. A total of 99 switches direct telephony traffic around the core and local networks. In addition, we have more than 500 hub sites, points of presence,
repeater nodes or other type of network site, and over 140 radio sites.

The
transmission network uses synchronous digital hierarchy. This technology allows high-speed data transmission and redirects transmissions in the event of a problem to
prevent any disruption. Our backbone network also provides asynchronous transfer mode, or ATM, and Internet protocol, or IP, services. The duct network was built with sufficient duct capacity to
accommodate up to 2,300 fibers on the majority of the network. This network was designed to enable the placement of active components, like routing devices, close to our customers, allowing us to
offer a broad range of voice and data services. The backbone transmission network connects all our voice switches and broadband Internet protocol routers.

20

---

We have a variety of alternative methods to carry our national telecommunications network over the "last mile" to the premises of those customers which are located outside of our cabled
areas. We:



IT

We outsource the management of the primary elements of our IT systems to IBM, pursuant to an agreement with IBM which terminates in 2013. We retain control of our
IT activities that are fundamental to our competitive advantage and key to the development of our intellectual property. The services IBM provides include:



On
September 30, 2003, we amended our agreement with IBM. Under this amended agreement, prices for services previously provided to us by IBM were renegotiated on terms more
favorable to us. IBM will also provide additional services to us. Under the amended agreement, annual service charges may be reduced if we successfully implement our integrated billing systems and, as
a result, achieve cost savings. Although this agreement terminates in accordance with its terms in 2013, we have the right to terminate it, with or without cause, on or after May 23, 2006,
subject to paying a termination fee. If we terminate the contract on or before December 31, 2010, we must pay a termination fee equal to £15 million. This fee decreases each
subsequent year to approximately £5.0 million in 2013.

Competition

We face significant competition from established and new competitors in the areas of residential telephone services, business telecommunications services,
Internet and cable television.

ntl: home

We compete primarily with BT in providing telephone services to residential customers in the UK. BT occupies an established market position and manages fully
built networks and has resources substantially greater than ours. In addition to BT, other telecommunications companies, like Alpha Telecom, One.Tel, Tesco and Carphone Warehouse, compete with us in
the residential telecommunications market. In particular, carrier pre-selection may increase the appeal of indirect access operators. These carriers offer discounted call charges that may
undercut our prices. BSkyB

21

---

currently
markets residential telecommunications services on an indirect access basis. Indirect access typically requires the customer to dial additional digits before entering the primary telephone
number. This diverts calls onto another operator's network.

We
also compete with mobile telephone networks that may threaten the competitive position of our networks, particularly if call charges are reduced further on the mobile networks.
However, we expect that any decrease in demand for telephone services as a result of competition from mobile telephone networks may be at least partially offset by increased demand for our services to
mobile telecommunications operators, which are provided by ntl: carriers and ntl: broadcast.

Our
cable television service competes with digital terrestrial television services like Freeview, a service provided by DTV Services Limited, a joint venture between BSkyB, Crown Castle
International Corp. and the BBC, digital satellite television services offered by BSkyB and satellite master antenna systems. In addition, pay television and pay per view services offered by us
compete to varying degrees with other communications and entertainment media, including home video, cinema exhibition of feature films, live theater and newly emerging multimedia services. We expect
that, in the future, we may face competition from programming provided by video-on-demand services.

Our
Internet services compete with BT and resellers of BT's Internet services. Competition in the Internet services market has been increasing. For example, the launch by Freeserve of
aggressive retail price discounts may, if successful, encourage other ISPs to also introduce discounted prices and other similar offers. We expect that the level of competition in the Internet service
market to increase significantly.

We
believe that we have a competitive advantage in the residential market because we offer integrated telephone, cable television, telecommunications services, including Internet,
interactive television and online services, as well as multi-product packages designed to encourage customers to subscribe to multiple services. The packages we currently offer to the majority of our
UK residential customers comprise telephone service, narrowband Internet access service, broadband Internet access services, all
of the current terrestrial television channels and access to multi-channel television, including pay per view and interactive television services. Our packaging and pricing are designed to encourage
our customers to use multiple services from us like dual telephone and broadband, dual telephone and narrowband, dual telephone and television, or triple telephone, television and Internet access. Of
our peers, only Telewest, which does not offer its services in our service areas, is able to directly offer the full range of services we provide.

ntl: business

We face a wide range of competitors in the UK market. The nature of this competition varies depending on geography, service offerings and size of the marketable
area. Only BT and Telewest have both extensive local access networks and a national backbone network. However, as Telewest's local networks do not overlap with our own networks, we do not compete with
Telewest to any material extent. BT is a major competitor in almost all of our opportunities. Cable and Wireless plc, or C&W, and Energis own national backbone networks and they tend to focus on the
large enterprise/corporate markets. However, these companies do not own local networks to any material extent and rely on wholesale arrangements to supply their customers.

Colt
Telecom Group plc has an extensive network particularly in London and also focuses on large enterprise and corporate accounts. Thus Group plc has its network in Scotland,
principally in Edinburgh and Glasgow, and United Utilities plc has its network in Manchester. We face these competitors on a local basis mainly in the medium to large end of the SME market and in the
market for larger corporate accounts and public sector organizations. In addition, for voice services we compete with a number of resellers who purchase wholesale minutes from BT and others and
compete aggressively in the retail market.

22

---

Although
many customers have a dual supplier sourcing policy, competition remains based on price and quality of service. We expect price competition to intensify as existing and other
new entrants compete aggressively. Most of these competitors have substantial resources and we cannot assure you that these or other competitors will not expand their businesses in our existing
markets or that we will be able to continue to compete successfully with these competitors in the business telecommunications market.

ntl: broadcast

Crown is our primary competitor in the terrestrial broadcast transmission market in the UK. Crown provides analog and digital transmission services primarily to
the BBC. Crown has diversified from its core broadcast transmission business by using its transmission infrastructure to enter into the wireless site leasing business and telecommunications sectors.

Although
Crown is our direct competitor, Crown and we have reciprocal rights under a site-sharing arrangement to use each other's sites for broadcast transmission in order to
enable each of us to achieve countrywide coverage. For a description of our site sharing arrangements see "Properties."

Crown
also offers site rental on a significant number of its sites, some of which are managed on behalf of third parties. Like us, Crown offers a full range of site-related
services to its customers, including installation and maintenance. We believe our towers to be at least as well situated as Crown's towers and that we will be able to continue expanding our own
third-party site-sharing penetration.

All
four 2G UK mobile operators own site infrastructure and lease space to other users. Their openness to sharing with direct competitors varies by operator. T-Mobile and
O2 (UK) Limited have announced joint deployment on some sites in the UK. BT and C&W are both major site-sharing customers but also compete by leasing their own sites to third
parties.

Several
other companies compete in the market for site rental. These include Gridcom UK, which is part of the merged National Grid Lattice plc, the Automobile Association and the Royal
Automobile Club. Some companies own sites initially developed for their own networks, while others are developing sites specifically to exploit this market.

Airwave,
a division of MMO2 plc, and Vivista Ltd. compete with ntl: broadcast in bidding for managed services in the digital public safety market in the UK. Airwave
uses our towers as part of its network. BT, Kingston Communications (Hull) Plc, or Kingston Communications, the BBC and Globecast, the broadcast service division of France Telecom, compete in the
provision of satellite and media services.

ntl: carriers

BT and C&W are our principal competitors across the carrier services and mobile markets. Competition is based on price, range and quality of services. BT has a
local access network across the UK that puts BT in a strong competitive position. Competition is most intense on key city-to-city routes where new entrants have increased the
number of suppliers and had a significant negative impact on prices. Where opportunities are more closely aligned to the geographic areas we serve, the number of our competitors is significantly
reduced.

ntl: Ireland

Since 1998, BSkyB has had a presence in the Irish pay-television market. In the past three years, BSkyB has aggressively marketed its digital
television service to Irish consumers. We estimate that BSkyB is the second largest pay television operator in the Irish market, based on the number of subscribers, after ntl: Ireland. BSkyB completed
a deal in April 2002 with Radio Telefís Éireann and TV3 Television Network Limited, the Irish free to air broadcasters, to carry the television stations RTE1,
Network 2, TV3 and TG4 on its second tier package.

23

---

The
other principal competitors to our business operations in the Republic of Ireland are Eircom Limited and ESAT BT, a subsidiary of BT.

Government Regulation

Regulation by the European Union

The European Union, or EU, regulates our business through various legislative means. In February 2002, the EU adopted a package of legislative measures,
which set out a new framework for
electronic communication to ensure that the legislation is more technology neutral. The new regulatory framework, or NRF, consists of:



The
UK and Irish governments implemented these directives into law by the enactment of the Communications Act 2003 and the Communications Regulations Act 2002. See
"Regulation in the UK" and "Regulation in the Republic of Ireland."

Regulation in the UK

We are subject to statutory regulation under the Communications Act 2003 and the Broadcasting Acts 1990 and 1996.

Under
the Communications Act 2003, companies intending to provide designated electronic communications networks, or ECNs, or designated electronic communications services, or ECSs, are
required to give prior notification of their intention to do so to the Office of Communications, or OFCOM, in accordance with various conditions. This notification procedure replaces the previous
regime of individual licenses required by the Telecommunications Act 1984. As a prior holder of a public telecommunications operator license under the Telecommunications Act 1984, we are automatically
deemed to operate under the new regime. Our entitlement to provide services extends throughout the UK. The UK regulatory regime was supervised and enforced by the UK Office of the Director General of
Telecommunications, or OFTEL, until January 1, 2004, when enforcement powers
were transferred to OFCOM. A breach of any conditions, which apply to us, can lead to fines and ultimately to revocation of the right to provide a designated ECN or a designated ECS.

We
also hold a number of television licensable content service licenses to provide television content services under the Communications Act 2003. These licenses are also supervised and
enforced by OFCOM. Any breach of the conditions of these licenses, which apply to us, can lead to fines and ultimately to revocation of the right to provide the service.

SMP and market reviews

The notification procedure contains certain conditions, which apply only where a service provider has been found to have significant market power, or SMP, in a
relevant market. SMP is similar to the competition law concept of market dominance.

In
2003, OFTEL began a series of market reviews intended to identify which operators have SMP in a range of telecommunications and broadcasting markets. OFTEL's
provisional finding was that all fixed operators would have SMP in relation to the termination of voice calls on their own network. This finding is consistent with earlier findings that all mobile
companies similarly enjoy SMP in relation

24

---

to
the termination of calls on their networks. The OFTEL finding was based upon OFTEL's determination that the charges related to the termination of voice calls were not subject to
competitive pressures because these charges are reflected on the bills of the calling parties who are not the operators' own customers.

In
August 2003, OFTEL issued a statement confirming this finding. OFTEL set out the obligations that we and others would be expected to adhere to in light of this finding. A
condition of the notification procedure will require us to offer a fair and reasonable rate to interconnecting operators for the termination of calls on our network. OFTEL indicated that it would
consider a fair and reasonable rate to be one that was no higher than the regulated rate that BT must offer to terminate calls on its network. As we already offered and received voice calls to BT and
to other operators at a rate equivalent to the regulatory rate imposed on BT, it does not appear that this ruling has had a material effect on us.

With
respect to all of our other voice, data and Internet markets, OFTEL's conclusions, adopted by OFCOM, have been that we do not have SMP.

SMP and the broadcast transmission market

During 2003, ntl: broadcast's transmission business has continued to be subject to price regulation by OFTEL of some of its services under Communications Act 2003
regulatory regime. Our price-regulated business consists of the analog terrestrial television transmission services provided to the ITV companies and Channel 4/S4C, including the operation and
maintenance of transmission equipment.

The
price controls imposed on us are based on the allowable revenues we generated in 1997 of £53.4 million. For each subsequent year of the control, we are required to
reduce our revenues by 4% per year, after allowing for consumer price inflation. These controls were extended through December 31, 2003, while the market review was being conducted. In the
interim, OFTEL issued a Statutory Notice extending the previous regulatory requirements of the Telecommunications Act 1984 until the new market review is completed.

On
September 9, 2003, OFTEL published its initial review of the markets for terrestrial television and radio broadcast transmission, setting out its provisional findings on market
definition, market power and possible remedies.

In
its provisional findings, OFTEL concluded that we and Crown have SMP in the market for access to our respective masts and sites for the purposes of analog and digital terrestrial
television broadcast transmission services to end users. No party has SMP in the equivalent markets for radio transmission. The net effect of this finding, if implemented, would be to extend the scope
of regulation to cover digital as well as analog terrestrial broadcast transmission.

However,
OFTEL also indicated in its provisional findings that it did not favor maintaining the existing analog terrestrial price control regime, or introducing a new digital terrestrial
price control regime, for either us or Crown. OFTEL stated that it would, in lieu of a price control, impose requirements on us and Crown to grant access to our masts and sites on reasonable terms to
each other and third parties for the purposes of both analog and digital terrestrial television broadcast transmission to end users. OFTEL also stated that it would require that charges for this
access be reasonably derived from the cost of provision, and to require that there be no undue discrimination in the terms offered for this access. Crown and we would in addition be required to
publish a reference offer setting out prices, terms and conditions. Comments have now been published on this proposal but no final decision has yet been made by OFCOM.

Regulation of BT

The regulation of BT is also key to our business in a number of ways. Because BT is the dominant provider of voice telephone services and our major rival in
broadband services with a continued

25

---

monopoly
of the DSL local loop, it is important to us that BT is subject to strict controls regarding anti-competitive behavior. However, regulation in the form of retail price controls
can also reduce pricing to unsustainable levels. Finally, "open access" regulation in either voice telephone services or data markets could facilitate entry by other providers, including service
providers that do not own and run their own access infrastructure, intensifying the competitive threat to us.

BT
is subject to the same notification procedures as us and also to the same process of market reviews to determine whether there is SMP. The reviews completed to date have all concluded
that BT has SMP in several markets. The remaining reviews have made similar provisional findings. The effect of these reviews has been to subject BT to a large number of regulatory requirements at
both the retail and wholesale levels.

BT
will also be subject to a general presumption of market dominance in relation to its commercial behavior in relevant markets where it holds SMP, which is likely to lead to
restrictions on its ability to price and bundle services.

OFTEL
has stated that it intends to avoid retail price regulation wherever possible in favor of behavioral remedies, like fines for abusive conduct, and measures that stimulate
competitive entry, like unbundling broadband services and carrier pre-selection for voice telephone services. Regulation is unlikely to reduce prices directly but we could face an increase
in the number of competitors using BT's access infrastructure.

Other conditions of the General Authorization

As an ECN, we must satisfy a number of conditions, including:



Rights of way

Under the Communications Act 2003, service providers are eligible for enhanced legal rights in respect of access to private land, exemption from certain
requirements of general planning law and, under the Electronic Communications Code, the right to install equipment in the public highway. The Electronic Communications Code therefore creates a legal
framework for the installation and maintenance of a telecommunications network. These rights are subject to certain conditions relating to the use of powers which may be specified from time to time by
the UK Department of Trade &

26

---

Industry,
or the DTI. Failure to adhere to these conditions could lead to fines or ultimately to the revocation of rights under the Electronic Communications Code.

Universal service obligations

The Communications Act 2003 introduced powers relating to universal service obligations. Following a direction by OFTEL, BT and Kingston Communications continue
to be the only operators to be affected by universal service obligations, except the obligations to provide:



However,
OFTEL recommended that OFCOM should conduct a full review of universal service in 2004, including a review of the funding of the provision of universal services. This will form
part of the strategic review of telecommunications (see below). It is possible that this might recommend universal service obligations be imposed on service providers including us. Although BT and (in
the city of Hull) Kingston Communications would be the primary obligated parties, other service providers could be
required to contribute to a universal service fund that would in part compensate BT and Kingston Communications for the execution of their own universal service obligations.

Strategic review of telecommunications

OFCOM has decided that one of its first key tasks will be to review the UK telecommunications sector. The terms of reference are very wide and its conclusions
will shape the strategy through which OFCOM promotes competition in the sector. The review is expected to be concluded by the fall of 2004. However, OFCOM's subsequent actions will still need to fit
within the New Regulatory Framework of the EU (see "Regulation by the European Union" above). Within those parameters, it is possible that OFCOM's conclusions might lead to the further relaxation of
regulation on BT; alternatively, they might recommend tighter regulation or even structural reorganization of BT which could potentially benefit us.

Competition Act 1998

The Competition Act 1998, which came into force in March 2000, introduced a prohibition on the abuse of a dominant position and on
anti-competitive agreements. It also introduced third party rights, stronger investigative powers, interim measures and enforcement powers. These enforcement powers include fines of up to
10% of annual UK revenues for each year of a breach, up to a maximum of three years. The Competition Act 1998 is enforced by the Office of Fair Trading, or OFT, and gives concurrent enforcement powers
to the sector regulator, OFCOM, and previously OFTEL. The Act also enables third parties to bring enforcement actions directly against persons, including telecommunications operators, who are in
breach of the prohibitions and seek damages, rather than have to wait for OFCOM to undertake enforcement action.

In
February 2000, OFTEL issued specific guidance on the application of the Competition Act 1998 in the telecommunications sector. This guidance stated that OFTEL would follow
closely the general principles set out in the OFT's guidance on the application of the Competition Act 1998 in its application of those prohibitions. In addition, the regulators are not permitted to
reach decisions that are inconsistent with European Community, or EC law.

27

---

The Competition Act 1998 limits the types of agreements and arrangements we can enter into. For example, we may be prohibited from establishing pricing arrangements or purchasing
arrangements which have the effect of reducing competition in the market or forcing companies to behave in a certain way dictated by us.

Enterprise Act 2002

The competition and consumer protection provisions of the Enterprise Act 2002 came into force on June 20, 2003. These provisions introduced a range of
measures to enhance business by strengthening the UK's competition law framework. The main reforms in the Enterprise Act are:

Competition.To a large extent, independent competition bodies rather than the DTI will now make decisions on merger and
market investigations using competition-based tests. In the case of merger control, a competition-based test replaces the existing public interest test and will assess whether relevant mergers may
lead to a "substantial lessening of competition." In addition, a new jurisdictional threshold on revenues replaces the previous gross assets test. The acquisition of a business with annual sales in
the UK of £70 million or more will constitute a merger that the OFT has a general duty, subject to certain exceptions, to refer for investigation by the Competition Commission if
OFT believes the merger may be expected to result in a substantial lessening of competition in the UK.

Under
the new regime, the competition authorities are obliged to consult on and give reasons for all significant decisions. There is a new right of appeal to the Competition Appeal
Tribunal, or CAT, in merger and market inquiries. Inquiries have to be completed within statutory maximum timetables. Reforms to the Competition Commission's procedures allow for a more transparent
and better-informed remedy-setting phase following the publication of provisional competition findings.

Individuals
who cause or encourage the making of agreements between competitors designed to fix prices, share markets, limit supply or production and rig bids within the UK, can be
prosecuted and punished by imprisonment for up to 5 years and unlimited fines. The courts may also order the disqualification for up to 15 years of directors whose companies have
committed a breach of UK or EC competition law. Victims of anti-competitive behavior will have greater opportunities to gain redress, and will now find it easier to bring claims for
damages for losses suffered owing to anti-competitive behavior. Where infringement has already been established by the OFT, CAT or the European Commission, the CAT can award damages for
that infringement. Where there have been no such prior findings of infringement, claims may still be pursued in the High Court,
although the claimant itself will in these circumstances need to establish that there has been an infringement.

Consumer Protection.Stop now orders will now be available to protect consumers from traders who do not meet their legal
obligations. The new enforcement regime will apply to infringements of a wide range of legislation protecting the economic interests of consumers, like failing to carry out a service to a reasonable
standard. This will also ensure that honest traders, especially small businesses, do not face unfair competition from those who engage in unlawful conduct.

Designated
consumer bodies will be empowered to make "super-complaints" to the OFT about features of a market that are harming consumers. The aim is to address situations where markets
have failed to work for consumers, rather than the conduct of particular companies. The OFT will be required to specify what action it intends to take within 90 days of receiving a complaint.

Regulation in the Republic of Ireland

Relevant Authority

The Commission for Communications Regulation, or ComReg, is the body responsible for regulation of the communications industry in Ireland. The Communications
Regulations Act 2002 replaced the Office of the Director of Telecommunications Regulation with ComReg.

28

---

Legislation and Licensing

Until July 25, 2003, ntl: Ireland had a general telecommunications license under the Telecommunications Act 1983 and separate cable television and MMDS
licenses for its franchises in Dublin, Galway and Waterford under the Wireless Telegraphy Acts 1926 to 1988. In addition, the cable television industry in the Republic of Ireland was governed by the
Wireless Telegraphy (Program Service Distribution) Regulations 1999.

On
July 25, 2003, these licenses and regulations were repealed as part of the transposition of Directives enacted under the NRF. See "Regulation by the European
Union." All operators of ECNs were required to notify ComReg of their services by September 5, 2003. We have been duly authorized.

The
authorizations regime will also apply to our MMDS services, but it will exist in parallel to our existing MMDS licenses. Conditions attached to our licenses will continue without
change since there will continue to be different rules for services that involve usage of radio spectrum allocated to specific uses under the Republic of Ireland's national spectrum plan.

In
relation to the provision of telephone services, the conditions attaching to the authorization will be identical to those applicable in the UK. The only condition attaching to our
authorization to operate a cable network will be a requirement to adhere to the technical conditions specified by ComReg. Following the introduction of the NRF, our cable business in Ireland is now
effectively in a similar regulatory position to that of BSkyB, except that BSkyB's satellite network does not fall within the definition of an ECN and will accordingly not require authorization.

The
introduction of this new regulatory regime means that all previous regulatory obligations arising out of our 1999 license and the Wireless Telegraphy (Program Service Distribution)
Regulations 1999 are suspended. Under the new regulatory scheme, there are:



The
Irish government has indicated that it will introduce new legislation to address the regulatory gap between retail broadcast services, including cable, satellite, digital terrestrial
television and other electronic communications services. However, it is unclear whether this legislation will introduce equivalent consumer protection and quality of service obligations for broadcast
as now apply under the NRF for other electronic communications services.

Levy

As our cable business does not require an authorization as an ECS, it will not be subject to an ECS authorization fee or levy. This means that the existing 3.5%
license fee on our cable revenues has ceased being charged since July 25, 2003.

As
our cable network falls within the definition of an ECN, it will require an authorization and there will be a requirement on ntl: Ireland to pay an associated authorization fee.
ComReg imposes a fee of €0.50 per customer per annum for cable and, as satellite does not fall within the definition of an ECN, a "voluntary" fee of €0.50 per dish for
BSkyB. This new fee structure took effect from July 25, 2003.

29

---

MMDS

Our MMDS business in the Republic of Ireland provides analog and digital television to approximately 17,095 residential customers in our Dublin, Galway and
Waterford network areas. We were obligated under our MMDS licenses to provide MMDS services in a digital format by January 1, 2001, with a grace period until June 30, 2001. Failure to
meet these milestones could have resulted in revocation of our MMDS licenses.

In
December 2000, we informed ComReg that we did not intend to provide television services in a digital format on our MMDS networks and accordingly undertook to transfer the
licenses and the customer base to a third party. However, a sale was not completed during the period from December 2000 to November 2002. After November 2002, we reached an
agreement with ComReg to implement a revised digital rollout schedule. As part of this agreement, we undertook to make DTV services available to 95% of customers within our MMDS franchise areas by
June 1, 2003 and lodged a €100,000 bond with ComReg that would be forfeited in the event we did not comply.
On May 1, 2003 we notified ComReg that we had met the revised rollout schedule and, following a technical audit, ComReg authorized our recovery of the bond.

We
will continue to operate under our existing license issued in 1999 under the Wireless Telegraphy Act. In practice, this means that we are guaranteed the allocation of spectrum we
received when the 1999 license was granted, but with fewer restrictions than the 1999 license and amended to reflect the provisions of the NRF. This means that the following provisions will be
removed:



ComReg
has decided to impose a new levy on MMDS operators that contains two elementsa per subscriber fee of €0.50 per year and a fee for spectrum usage of
€1,905 per MHz of spectrum per annum with a scaling mechanism based on the number of homes subject to the regulation. We have an MMDS allocation of 22 8MHz channels. ComReg has
recently indicated that it believes 11 8MHz channels are sufficient for MMDS operators to provide a full digital service. Accordingly, it has requested that we present a plan by June 30, 2004
detailing our requirements for radio spectrum in the MMDS band. ComReg is consulting on the matter in advance of an EU decision on the future allocation of services in the MMDS band. There is a risk
that our existing allocation in this band will be reduced as a result of the EU decision.

Analysis of SMP

Under the NRF, ComReg is required to undertake an analysis of the entire communications market in order to assess the level of competition in the various sectors
and whether there is a need for regulatory intervention. In markets that are not deemed to be competitive, like fixed voice, one or more operators will be designated as having significant market
power. Significant market power operators will be subject to particularly intrusive regulation like price control, open access and regulatory accounting.

The
market analysis is particularly focused on eighteen relevant markets identified by the European Commission. The retail broadcast market is not one of these markets. However, ComReg
can go beyond or deviate from the European Commission's guidance and request that additional markets be deemed not sufficiently competitive. For the past year ComReg has indicated that it considers
the retail broadcast market not sufficiently competitive. The European Commission has confirmed that there is no economic basis for this conclusion. Furthermore, the Commission has recently vetoed a
decision of the Finnish Regulator, FICORA, which deviated from the Commission's

30

---

guidance
on the grounds that FICORA did not provide sufficient evidence to support the conclusion of its market analysis and therefore that it was not compatible with EU law.

Research and Development

Our research and development activities involve the analysis of technological developments affecting our cable television, telephone and telecommunications
business, the evaluation of existing services and sales and marketing techniques and the development of new services and techniques.

Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights and Licenses

We do not have any material patents or copyrights nor do we believe that patents play a material role in our business. We own and have the right to use registered
trademarks, which in some cases are, and in others may be, of material importance to our business, including the "ntl:" logo. In addition, we are substantially dependent on the authorizations granted
by the legislative agencies which regulate our various businesses. The loss of any one or more of those authorizations could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Customers

The following customers provide a significant portion of our revenues:



Except
for our ntl: broadcast and ntl: carriers reportable segments, we do not believe that the loss of any one customer would have a materially adverse effect on our results of
operations. In the case of each of our ntl: broadcast and ntl: carriers reportable segments, the loss of the customer identified above for that segment would have a materially adverse effect on that
segment.

Employees

At December 31, 2003, we had approximately 13,650 employees, approximately 13,100 of whom are permanent and approximately 550 of whom are temporary or
contract employees. We believe that our relationship with our employees is generally good.

In
2002 we implemented a program to introduce a new set of contractual terms and conditions with our employees. This program generally has been successful. However, of our employees who
are members of the Broadcasting Entertainment Cinematograph and Theatre Union, or BECTU, 368 have rejected this effort to introduce a new set of terms and conditions, and wish to remain on their
existing contractual terms. The majority of these employees support ntl: broadcast's operations group, which looks after matters such as network maintenance and fault repair. They represent
approximately 28% of the total number of employees in ntl: broadcast. BECTU has recently decided to ballot its members to demand us to withdraw the program, the results of which to our knowledge will
not be known until the end of March 2004. We have prepared contingency plans to deal with any adverse outcome.

31

---

Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Company

We have historically incurred losses and may not be profitable in the future.

We have incurred substantial losses historically and expect to continue to incur substantial losses. We had net losses for the year ended December 31, 2003
of $954.2 million, and net losses for the years ended December 31:



As
of December 31, 2002, our accumulated deficit was $18.6 billion. On January 10, 2003, we emerged from reorganization under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code
and adopted fresh-start reporting.
At that time, our assets and liabilities were revalued. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation." As of December 31, 2003, our accumulated
deficit was $954.2 million.

We
cannot be certain that we will achieve or sustain profitability in the future. Failure to achieve profitability could diminish our ability to sustain operations, meet financial
covenants, obtain additional required funds and make required payments on our present or future indebtedness.

We have only recently begun to generate positive cash flow

Pursuant to US GAAP, we measure cash flow as all changes affecting cash in the activities of operations, investments and financing. Historically,
construction costs, operating expenditures and interest costs have contributed to our negative cash flow. This financial situation has only recently changed. We had positive cash flow of
$155.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 principally due to the net proceeds of $1,367 million from our rights offering. We had positive cash flow of
$250.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, principally due to our non-payment of $566.8 million of interest on some of our debt incurred prior to our
reorganization. We had negative cash flow of $172.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 and negative cash flow of $650.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2000. We cannot be certain that we will continue to sustain positive cash flow in the future, which could adversely affect our ability to match our business plan.

We are required to make significant principal payments commencing in 2005 and have other contractual commitments coming due over the next several years.

As of December 31, 2003, we have over $5.4 billion of principal payments and other contractual commitments coming due over the next three years,
including £2.6 billion, or $4.6 billion, due under our senior credit facility on September 30, 2005. Beginning in 2005, a series of principal payments will come due on
our other existing debt as they approach their maturity dates, unless we are able to refinance this debt or renegotiate the terms of these commitments. We are currently seeking to effect a refinancing
transaction that would repay in full this senior credit facility. See "Recent Developments."

As
we cannot be certain that we will be able to refinance this debt, renegotiate the terms or make these principal payments and other contractual commitments, on suitable terms or at
all, our ability to make these payments and other commitments is dependent upon a number of factors, including our existing cash balances, the cash flow generated by our operating subsidiaries and our
ability to obtain additional financing in the future. Failure to achieve profitability or maintain or achieve various other financial performance levels could in the future diminish our ability to
sustain operations, meet

32

---

financial
covenants, obtain additional funds and make required payments on our present or future indebtedness.

Our business is capital intensive and we may not have access to cash to fund our future capital expenditures.

Our business requires substantial capital expenditures on a continuing basis for various purposes, including:



From
time to time, we also need to make capital expenditures for particular projects like integrating our billing and customer service systems. For the period of January 1, 2004
through March 31, 2005, we expect to spend between £420 million and £460 million, or between $750 million and $820 million, on acquiring
fixed assets. We believe that our cash on hand, together with cash from operations, will be sufficient for our cash requirements through March 2005. However, our cash requirements after these periods
may exceed, perhaps significantly, these sources of cash. In addition, we have significant principal payments of our indebtedness coming due beginning in 2005 unless our proposed refinancing is
consummated. See "Recent Developments" above. Nevertheless, we may not be able to obtain financing at all, or on favorable terms, or we may be contractually prevented by the terms of our current
indebtedness from incurring additional indebtedness.

Our substantial amount of debt could adversely affect our financial health and diminish stockholder value.

As of December 31, 2003, our long-term indebtedness, net of unamortized discount, was $5,728.4 million.

Our
substantial indebtedness, coupled with the relatively high interest rate on our indebtedness, could adversely affect us by:



In
addition, the significant cash payments required as a result of our indebtedness could negatively impact stockholder value. Any inability to repay our indebtedness or obtain
additional financing, as needed, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The restrictive covenants under our indebtedness may limit our operations.

The agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness significantly restrict and, in some cases, prohibit our ability and the ability of most of our subsidiaries
to:



33

---



Our
subsidiaries and we must also comply with various financial covenants requiring specified financial performance levels to be met and maintained. In the event that we fail to meet any
of these covenants and are unable to cure the failure or otherwise renegotiate the covenant, the lenders under those agreements would have significant rights to seize control of most of our assets
because these agreements are secured by substantially all of our assets. A default under one debt agreement could trigger a default under our other debt agreements.

Furthermore,
upon the occurrence of any default under these agreements, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under these agreements, to be immediately due and
payable. If those lenders accelerate the payment of those amounts, we cannot assure you that our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries will be sufficient to repay in full those amounts.

Failure to control customer churn may adversely affect our financial performance.

The successful implementation of our business plan depends upon us controlling our customer churn. Customer churn is a measure of customers who stop taking our
services. An increase in customer churn can lead to increased costs and reduced revenues. In order to control customer churn, we aim to improve our customer service. If we fail to deliver a
satisfactory level of customer service, this could contribute to an increase in customer churn. It will be difficult to improve customer service without an integrated billing system and customer
database across our entire network, which we do not presently have. Although we are in the process of integrating our billing systems and customer databases, there can be no assurance that we will be
successful in achieving our goal. The change over to a new customer database system may cause billing errors which can lead to customer churn. If we are not successful in integrating these systems, we
could experience an adverse effect on customer service and, in turn, an increase in our customer churn rate. In addition, our customer churn rate may also increase if we are unable to deliver our
services over our network without interruption.

Our
ability to control customer churn could also be adversely affected by the availability of competing services in the UK, like the digital satellite services offered by BSkyB, and
digital terrestrial television services like Freeview, a joint venture owned by the BBC, Crown Castle International and BSkyB. Competing services also include telephone, dial-up Internet
and broadband Internet services offered by BT. BT and BSkyB have regularly launched joint campaigns to entice our customers to move to these competing services. As we attempt to migrate customers to
our digital television, or DTV, services, it is possible that some of our customers may move to our competitors. In addition, as our ATV, or dial-up Internet customers choose to migrate to
DTV or broadband Internet services in areas where we do not have an adequate network, we may lose these customers to competitors that can provide these services. For example, of the approximately
1.4 million homes passed by our network in London, we are not able to offer broadband Internet to approximately 800,000 homes. However, broadband Internet is being offered in this area by some
of our competitors. Some of our customers in this area currently use our dial-up Internet services, and may also use our telephone or television

34

---

services.
These customers may discontinue some or all our services if they decide to use the broadband Internet services provided by our competitors.

We could experience an adverse effect on our customer service, customer acquisitions, customer churn rate and operating costs if we do not successfully
integrate our various billing and operation platforms in a timely manner.

As a result of our growth through acquisitions we inherited numerous billing and customer service systems. We are in the process of integrating our various
billing systems and customer databases to improve our customer service and our collections. It is possible that billing errors and other customer service problems will occur during this integration,
potentially resulting in increased customer churn. In addition, we cannot be certain that this integration project will be successful. If the full integration of our billing and customer service
systems is not successful, we could experience an adverse effect on our customer service, customer acquisitions, churn rate and costs of maintaining these systems going forward. We have attempted to
integrate our billing systems in the past, but previous integration projects were not completed.

Failure to market broadband Internet services successfully will adversely impact our revenue and results of operations.

A significant component of our strategy is to market broadband Internet services successfully to residential customers. We believe that our "triple play" offering
of telephone service, broadband access to the Internet and digital television will prove attractive to our existing customer base and allow us to increase our average revenue per user, or ARPU.
However, broadband Internet usage by residential customers remains a relatively new and underdeveloped market. As of December 31, 2003, out of
approximately 6.8 million homes currently able to receive broadband Internet service from us, we had approximately 949,200 residential customers receiving this service. In addition, we face
significant competition in these markets through alternative Internet access media, including digital subscriber line, or DSL, services offered by companies like BT and Freeserve and
dial-up services offered by many companies, including America Online. If customers are not prepared to pay a premium for broadband Internet access, compared with less expensive slower
speed services like dial-up Internet access, we may not be able to market broadband Internet services successfully. If we are unable to charge prices for broadband Internet services that
are anticipated in our business plan in response to competition or if our competition delivers better services to our customers, our results of operations will be adversely affected.

We are a holding company and are dependent upon cash flow from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations.

We are a holding company with no independent operations or significant assets other than our investments in and advances to our subsidiaries. We depend upon the
receipt of sufficient funds from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations. The terms of our senior credit facility and the notes of our subsidiaries Diamond Holdings and NTL Triangle limit the payment
of dividends, loan repayments and other distributions to or from us under many circumstances. In particular, the various agreements governing the debt of our subsidiaries restrict and, in some cases,
prohibit the ability of these subsidiaries to move cash among our operating subsidiaries or to us to enable our subsidiaries or us to meet our cash flow needs. Even if we consummate the proposed
refinancing and repay our existing senior credit facility and the Diamond and Triangle notes, we will continue to depend upon the receipt of sufficient funds from our operating subsidiaries to meet
our obligations, including our obligations under any new credit facilities. Any future indebtedness of our subsidiaries and us raised in any refinancing is likely to contain similar terms. Some of our
subsidiaries are also dependent on funding from us. The inability to transfer cash among entities within our group may mean that even though we may have sufficient resources to meet our obligations,
we may not be permitted to make the necessary transfers from one entity in our group to another in order to make payments to the entity which has

35

---

the
obligations. The laws of the jurisdictions under which our subsidiaries are organized also have restrictions on the payment of dividends.

We are subject to taxation in multiple jurisdictions.

We are subject to taxation in the United States, the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Our effective tax rate and tax liability will be affected by a number of
factors, like the amount of taxable income in particular jurisdictions, the tax rates in these jurisdictions, tax treaties between jurisdictions, the extent to which we transfer funds to and
repatriate funds from our subsidiaries, and future changes in the law. Our tax liability will be dependent upon our operating results and the manner in which our operations are funded. Generally, the
tax liability for each legal entity is determined either on a
non-consolidated basis or on a consolidated basis only with other entities incorporated in the same jurisdiction. In either case, our tax liability is determined without regard to the
taxable losses of non-consolidated affiliated entities. As a result, we may pay income taxes in one jurisdiction for a particular period even though on an overall basis we incur a net loss
for that period.

We have historically had a deficiency of earnings to fixed charges and our earnings in the future may not be sufficient to cover those fixed charges.

For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999, our earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges. The deficiency was approximately
$959.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, $2,447.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, $11,786.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2001, $2,563.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, and $785.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, including
capitalized interest, amortization of fees related to debt financing and rent expense deemed to be interest. Our earnings in the future may not be sufficient to cover those fixed charges.

Our internal controls need to be improved.

Following our emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, we undertook an examination of a number of our internal controls and procedures. From that examination, we
determined that some of our controls and procedures should be improved. For example, as a result of our historical growth through acquisitions, our internal control systems are derived from disparate
businesses. We identified the need to improve the documentation of our detailed accounting policies and procedures to ensure that they are consistently applied throughout our business. We also
identified the need to improve our procedures for reconciling between our telephone call data records and billing systems and the need for a comprehensive corporate business and disaster recovery
plan.

In
addition, we are examining methods for improving management's control of operations by developing consistent policies for the procurement and management of contracts with third party
vendors. Furthermore, we are working to improve our operating practice and procedures relating to budgeting, authorizing, monitoring and appraising major projects. Although we have policies in place,
we are working to ensure that they are consistently applied.

Pursuant
to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we will be required to include in our Form 10-K filings, beginning with our Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2004, a report by our management as to the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and our independent auditors will be required to
attest to and report on this evaluation by management. We have set up a project team that is working to document, evaluate and test our internal controls to enable our management to report that we
have effective internal controls over financial reporting at December 31, 2004. There can be no assurance that we will achieve this objective. In particular, if we are unable to complete the
integration of our billing systems and customer databases by December 31, 2004, it may impact our ability to fully document, evaluate and test the effectiveness of the internal controls
relating to these systems and databases prior to that date.

36

---

We are subject to significant competition in each of our reportable segments and we expect that competition will intensify.

BT and BSkyB dominate some of the markets in which we operate our telephone and television services. These competitors each have very large market shares and
generally have fewer financial and operating constraints than we have. As existing technology develops and new technologies emerge, we believe that competition will intensify in each of our business
areas. For example, mobile telephone services are becoming increasingly popular as an alternative to fixed line services like ours. In the digital television market, Freeview is expected to launch a
low-cost pay-TV service that may compete for digital television customers. Also, BT or a third party to whom BT resells capacity may provide program content like video on
demand over the BT DSL network. Some of our competitors have substantially greater financial and technical resources than we have. Moreover, we may be required to reduce prices if our competitors
reduce prices or as a result of any other downward pressure on prices for telecommunications services. Any reduction in our prices could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.

In
addition, BSkyB has access to various movie and sports programming content that is used to create some of the most popular pay TV channels in the UK. While we carry several of those
channels on our systems, we are dependent upon BSkyB to provide us with this content. The OFT has determined that BSkyB was dominant in some wholesale premium pay TV markets in the UK, specifically in
its offering of various sports content and premium pay-TV movie channels. Although this determination of dominance could constrain BSkyB in its pricing of these channels, the current
pricing for this content remains unfavorable to us. We and BSkyB have reached agreement on the main principles of a marketing incentive scheme that will provide us with improved economic terms based
on increased sales of BSkyB's premium movie and sports channels. Conclusion of this deal is subject to various matters, including the negotiation of a long form carriage agreement. There can be no
assurance that we will enter into a definitive agreement with BSkyB, that any changes to the existing pricing arrangements will be made or if made, that any changes will prove beneficial to us.

Our
contract with BSkyB for the supply of its basic channels expires in 2006. If it is not renewed, this could result in a loss of present customers or make it more difficult for us to
attract new customers and this could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

We have experienced significant changes in our senior management and our management team has been together for a limited time.

A small number of key executive officers manage our businesses. Since completion of the Plan, there have been a number of changes in our senior management team.
In March 2003, James F. Mooney, our chairman, and Scott E. Schubert, our chief financial officer, joined us. In April 2003, Simon P. Duffy joined us as our chief operating officer. In
August 2003, Barclay Knapp resigned as our president and chief executive officer and was replaced by Mr. Duffy. The loss of one or more of our executive officers could have a material
adverse effect on us. A number of other executive officers, who were based in New York, also resigned in 2003. The responsibilities of these persons were delegated to existing and new employees.

Because
of these management departures, additions and changes in roles, our current management team has not worked together in their current positions for a significant length of time
and may not be able to work together effectively in these new positions to successfully develop and implement our business strategies. In addition, as a result of these management changes, management
may need to devote significant attention and resources to preserve and strengthen relationships with employees and customers. All members of our management team will need to overcome the challenges
created by any vacancies in our senior management positions that remain unfilled. We believe that our future success will depend in large part on our continued ability to attract and retain highly
skilled and qualified personnel. Although we have entered into employment contracts with most of our executive officers,

37

---

those
contracts cannot prevent these individuals from resigning. In most cases, if an individual does resign, he is bound by non-compete clauses that may or may not discourage the
individual from leaving.

If
our new management team is unable to develop successful business strategies, achieve our business objectives or maintain effective relationships with employees and customers, our
ability to grow our business and successfully meet operational challenges could be impaired.

A catastrophe at one or more of the locations where our critical cable network systems are housed could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our business is dependent on many sophisticated critical systems, which support all of the various aspects of our cable network operations. The hardware
supporting a large number of critical systems for our cable network is housed in a relatively small number of locations. If one or more of these locations were to be subject to fire, natural disaster,
terrorism including electronic sabotage, power loss or other catastrophe, we would not be able to pass transmission signals over our cable network. This would cause serious harm to our business.
Although we have disaster recovery plans in respect of our ntl: networks and the network of ntl: broadcast which are designed to prevent or mitigate a potential failure, we cannot assure you that any
disaster recovery, security and service continuity protection measures we have, or may take, in the future will be sufficient. In addition, although we build our cable network in resilient rings to
ensure the continuity of network availability in the event of any damage to our underground fibers, it is likely that no transmission signals will be able to pass if any ring is cut twice. In
particular, a portion of our Irish operation is dependent upon our Sirius undersea ring connecting the Republic of Ireland to the UK.

Failure in our technology or telecommunications systems could significantly disrupt our operations, which could reduce our customer base and result in
lost revenues.

Our success depends, in part, on the continued and uninterrupted performance of our IT systems as well as our customer service centers. Our computer systems are
vulnerable to damage from a variety of sources, including telecommunications failures, malicious human acts and natural disasters. Moreover, despite security measures, our servers are potentially
vulnerable to physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses and similar disruptive problems. Despite the precautions we have taken, unanticipated problems affecting our systems could
cause failures in our IT systems, including systems that are critical for timely and accurate customer billing, or our customer service centers. Sustained or repeated system failures that interrupt
our ability to provide service to our customers or otherwise meet our business obligations in a timely manner would adversely affect our reputation and result in a loss of customers and net revenue.
Although some of our IT systems are covered by a disaster recovery plan, we are currently developing a comprehensive disaster recovery plan for all our IT systems in conjunction with the integration
of our customer and billing databases. We cannot assure you that any existing disaster recovery plan will be sufficient, nor whether any changes to that plan can be implemented on a timely basis, or
at all, and if implemented will be sufficient.

We do not insure the underground portion of our cable network and various pavement-based electronics associated with our cable network.

We obtain insurance of the type and in the amounts that we believe are customary for similar companies. Consistent with this practice, we do not insure the
underground portion of our cable network or various pavement-based electronics associated with our cable network. Substantially all of our cable network is constructed underground. As a result, any
catastrophe that affects our underground cable network or our pavement-based electronics could prevent us from providing services to our customers and result in substantial uninsured losses.

38

---

The telecommunications industry is subject to rapid technological changes and we cannot predict the effect of any changes on our businesses.

The services we provide our customers may become outdated owing to technological breakthroughs rendering our services out of date. In addition, our business plan
contemplates the introduction of services using new technologies. Our investments in those new services, like those related to the third generation, or 3G, mobile network, may prove premature. We may
not realize anticipated returns on these new products. The cost of implementation for emerging and future technologies could be significant. Our ability to fund this implementation may depend on our
ability to obtain additional financing.

Our prospects will depend in part on our ability to control our costs while maintaining and improving our service levels.

As a result of capital constraints imposed on our business during our restructuring, we reduced expenditures in a variety of areas, including a substantial
reduction in capital expenditures, a reduction in the number of our employees and the outsourcing of some functions. Some of these expenditures, particularly capital expenditures and employee costs,
may increase in future periods in order to accommodate growth in our business. Our prospects will depend in part on our ability to continue to control costs and operate more efficiently, while
maintaining and improving our existing service levels. In particular, in order to reduce costs, we are in the process of negotiating with several of our vendors for better terms under existing and
future agreements. We cannot be certain that these negotiations will conclude successfully.

ntl: broadcast and ntl: carriers are dependent upon ITV and other contracts.

ntl: broadcast has contracts for the provision of television broadcasting transmission services across the UK to 15 regional commercial television stations,
collectively known as ITV, Channel 4/S4C and Five, formerly Channel 5. Although the ITV companies and Channel 4/S4C have renewed their contracts with us in the past, we cannot assure you that they
will do so upon expiration of their current contracts in 2012. Our contract with Five is up for renewal in 2007. Even if the current contracts are renewed, the terms of renewal may be on a basis less
favorable to us or may not cover all of the transmission services that we currently provide to them. The UK government may decide to reallocate the analog spectrum currently used by these
broadcasters, forcing them to migrate to digital spectrums before the expiration of these contracts. This would result in the termination of our analog contracts prior to their expiration dates, which
would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Other
contracts important to ntl: broadcast include a contract for the provision of communications services to the Metropolitan Police in London. This contract is subject to renewal in
October 2004. We cannot assure you that the renewal will be on the same basis as the existing contract or that the Metropolitan Police will not seek other parties to provide some or all of the
services we currently provide for them. The Metropolitan Police in London is our largest public safety customer.

ntl:
carriers has a contract with Orange for the design, construction and operation of elements of Orange's mobile network in the UK. The minimum term of this contract is scheduled to
expire in 2006 and we cannot assure you that it will be renewed.

In
addition, ntl: carriers currently has a contract with Vodafone for the supply of mobile transmission services, including core inter-switch and backhaul network capacity in the UK.
This contract is scheduled to terminate in October 2004, and we do not expect that this contract will be renewed.

39

---

ntl: broadcast is dependent upon site sharing arrangements with its principal competitor.

As a result of various factors, including a natural shortage of potential transmission sites and the difficulties in obtaining local planning permission for
erection of further masts, we made arrangements with Crown to share a large number of analog tower sites that are owned by either us or Crown. We cannot assure you that these site-sharing
arrangements will remain in place. Termination of the site-sharing arrangements would have a material adverse effect on us, particularly if we no longer have the use of transmission sites
owned by Crown.

Crown
and we are negotiating a formal arrangement pending finalization of a digital site-sharing agreement that is expected to be on terms similar to our existing analog
site-sharing agreement. We currently have an informal arrangement with Crown with respect to sharing digital sites. We cannot assure you that Crown and we will reach a formal arrangement
with respect to digital site-sharing.

Our reportable segments are subject to government regulation and changes in current regulations may adversely affect us.

Our principal business activities are regulated and supervised by various governmental bodies. For example, the majority of the prices that our ntl: broadcast
segment may charge the ITV companies and Channel 4/S4C for transmission services are subject to regulation by our primary regulator, OFCOM. In addition, OFCOM launches regulatory initiatives from time
to time. Some of these initiatives may require significant expenditures by us. For example, OFCOM recently increased the amount of the funds which it requires communications providers to hold to cover
any liabilities which they may incur in installing infrastructure on public land.

Changes
in laws, regulations or governmental policy or the interpretations of those laws or regulations affecting our activities, like licensing requirements, changes in price or cost
regulation and deregulation of interconnection arrangements, could have a material adverse effect on us. For example, in the past, OFTEL has reserved the right to impose universal service obligations
on communication service providers.

We
are also subject to regulatory initiatives of the European Union. Changes in the European Union, or the EU, directives may reduce our range of programming and increase the costs of
purchasing television programming or require us to provide access to our cable network infrastructure to other service providers. Any of these changes could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations. In addition, EU regulators are proposing the adoption of a common European standard for set-top boxes used in customer premises equipment that is not compatible with
our set-top boxes. If this change is adopted, we could incur substantial costs to modify our equipment.

Our completed Chapter 11 reorganization may harm our business and our brand name.

Adverse publicity or news coverage regarding our recent Chapter 11 reorganization and financial condition could have an adverse effect on parts of our business.
We may find it difficult to convince customers to subscribe for our services and any negative publicity or news coverage may be used by our competition to convince customers to discontinue our
service, increasing customer churn. Although we
have completed the Plan, it is possible that this negative publicity will have a long-term effect on us and our brand name. For example, our recent reorganization has had an adverse impact
on our credit standing with our suppliers and other trade creditors. This increases our costs of doing business and hinders our negotiating power with our suppliers and other trade creditors.
Similarly, negative press about the financial condition of other cable and pay television operations and alternative telecom carriers in general may affect our reputation.

40

---

Fresh-start reporting may make future financial statements difficult to compare.

As a result of the completion of the Plan, we are operating our business under a new capital structure. In addition, we adopted fresh-start reporting in
accordance with SOP 90-7 as of January 1, 2003. Because SOP 90-7 required us to reset our assets and liabilities to current fair values, our financial condition and
results of operations after our reorganization will not be comparable in some material respects to the financial condition or results of operations reflected in our historical financial statements for
periods prior to January 1, 2003. This may make it difficult to assess our future prospects based on historical performance.

We are subject to currency and interest rate risks.

We encounter currency exchange rate risks because substantially all of our revenues and operating expenses are earned and paid primarily in pounds and, to a
lesser extent, euros, but we pay interest and principal obligations with respect to a portion of our existing indebtedness in US dollars. To the extent that the pound declines in value against
the US dollar, the effective cost of servicing our US dollar debt will be higher. Changes in the exchange rate result in foreign currency transaction gains or losses. As of
December 31, 2003, $485.3 million (net of unamortized discount of $141.9 million), or 8.5% of our long-term debt was in U.S. dollars.

Because
the revenues and expenses from our principal operations are denominated primarily in pounds but we report our financial results in US dollars, our financial results are
also impacted by currency fluctuations which are unrelated to our underlying results of operations.

We
are also subject to interest rate risk because we have substantial indebtedness at variable interest rates. As of December 31, 2003, interest is determined on a variable basis
on $4,968.6 million, or 86.7%, of our long-term debt, net of unamortized discount. An increase in interest rates of 0.25% would increase our interest expense by approximately
$12.4 million per year. We currently do not hedge our currency or interest rate risks. To the extent that we enter into hedging transactions in the future, we cannot assure you that any hedging
transactions we might enter into will be successful or that shifts in the currency exchange rates or interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on us.

Provisions of our debt agreements, our stockholder rights plan, our certificate of incorporation and Delaware law could prevent or delay a change of
control of our company.

We may, under some circumstances involving a change of control of our company, be obligated to offer to repurchase substantially all of our outstanding notes and
repay our outstanding indebtedness. We cannot assure you that we will have available financial resources necessary to repurchase those notes or repay that indebtedness in those circumstances.

If
we cannot repurchase those notes or repay that indebtedness in the event of a change of control of our company, the failure to do so would constitute an event of default under the
agreements under which that indebtedness was incurred and could result in a cross-default under other indebtedness that does not have similar provisions. The threat of this could have the effect of
delaying or preventing transactions involving a change of control of our company, including transactions in which our stockholders would receive a substantial premium for their shares over then
current market prices, or otherwise which they may deem to be in their best interest.

Our
stockholder rights plan, some provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our ability to issue additional shares of common stock or preferred stock to
third parties without stockholder approval may have the effect, alone or in combination with each other, of preventing or making more difficult transactions involving a change of control of our
company. In addition, we are subject to the Delaware anti-takeover law that prohibits some Delaware corporations from engaging in business combinations or other transactions with any
stockholder who owns 15% or

41

---

more
of the corporation's outstanding voting stock, for three years following the date that the stockholder acquired that interest.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

We do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our payment of any
dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors, including future earnings, operations, capital requirements, our general financial
condition and the general financial condition of our subsidiaries. In addition, under Delaware law, unless a corporation has available surplus it cannot declare or pay dividends on its capital stock.

Furthermore,
our various debt agreements impose limitations on the payment of dividends, the distribution of earnings and the making of other payments to us by our subsidiaries. These
restrictions limit amounts available for us to pay dividends on our common stock. The terms of any future indebtedness may contain similar limitations.

The market price of our common stock is subject to volatility as well as trends in the telecommunications industry in general.

The current market price of our common stock may not be indicative of prices that will prevail in the trading markets in the future. The market price of our
common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include actual or anticipated variations in our operational
results and cash flow, our earnings releases and our competitors' earnings releases, announcements of technological innovations, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts, trading volume,
market conditions in the industry and the general state of the securities markets and the market for telecommunications stocks, changes in capital markets that affect the perceived availability of
capital to communications companies, governmental legislation or regulation, currency and exchange rate fluctuations, as well as general economic and market conditions, like recessions. In particular,
valuations of telecommunications companies have generally fallen over the past few years. Trends in this industry are likely to have a corresponding impact on the price of our common stock.

Sales of large amounts of our common stock or the perception that sales could occur may depress our stock price.

As of March 10, 2004, there were 86,999,281 shares of common stock outstanding. At the time of our emergence from Chapter 11, we granted to some of our
stockholders rights to cause us, at our expense, to file one or more registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, covering resales of shares of our
common stock held by them, including upon exercise of the Series A warrants. In addition, we have granted to certain affiliates and managed accounts for which W.R. Huff Asset Management Co.,
L.L.C., or W.R. Huff Asset Management, acts as investment adviser,
certain funds for which Franklin Mutual Advisers acts as agent or investment adviser, and managed funds and third party accounts for which Oaktree Capital Management, L.L.C. acts as the general
partner or investment manager, similar registration rights covering resales of shares of common stock acquired by them upon exercise of rights in the rights offering. These shares may also be sold
under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, depending on their holding period and subject to significant restrictions in the case of shares held by persons deemed to be our affiliates.

Sales
of large blocks of shares of our common stock in the public market could lower our stock price and impair our ability to raise funds in future stock offerings.

42

---

We may in the future seek to raise funds through equity offerings, which could have a dilutive effect on our common stock.

In the future we may determine to raise capital through offerings of our common stock, securities convertible into our common stock, or rights to acquire these
securities or our common stock. In any case, the result would ultimately be dilutive to our common stock by increasing the number of shares outstanding. We cannot predict the effect this dilution may
have on the price of our common stock.

A small number of our stockholders has an influence over our business and affairs.

On March 10, 2004, W.R. Huff Asset Management owned approximately 12.9% of our outstanding common stock and Oaktree Capital owned approximately 7.1% of our
outstanding common stock.

William
R. Huff is the principal and president of W.R. Huff Asset Management and serves on our board of directors. Edwin M. Banks is a portfolio manager for W.R. Huff Asset Management
and serves on our board of directors. Brett G. Wyard is a managing director of Oaktree Capital and serves on our board of directors. As a result of these relationships, when conflicts between the
interests of W.R. Huff Asset Management, Oaktree Capital and the interests of our other stockholders arise, these directors may not be disinterested. These stockholders may also from time to time make
significant investments in other telecommunications companies, including their present investment in Telewest. A number of our significant stockholders and their affiliates, including W.R. Huff Asset
Management, Oaktree Capital and Franklin Mutual Advisers, are creditors of Telewest. If Telewest effects the debt for equity swap for which it announced it had reached an agreement in principle on
September 15, 2003, these entities and their affiliates are expected to be significant stockholders of Telewest. This may result in conflicts of interest. In addition, these stockholders may
own debt securities of our
subsidiaries. Actions these stockholders take relating to these investments may conflict with the interests of our other stockholders. Under Delaware law, although our directors and officers have a
duty of loyalty to us, transactions that we enter into in which a director has a conflict of interest are generally permissible so long as the material facts as to the director's or officer's
relationship or interest as to the transaction are disclosed to our board of directors and a majority of our disinterested directors approves the transaction, or the transaction is otherwise fair to
us.

Our
seven largest stockholders, including W.R. Huff Asset Management and Oaktree Capital, own approximately 60.2% of our outstanding common stock as of March 10, 2004.

43

---



Item 2.    Properties

In the UK and Ireland, we own, lease or occupy under license 112 business unit and regional offices, and our corporate head offices in each of Hook and Dublin. We
also maintain an office under lease in New York City. We do not currently occupy approximately 37% of our properties. We are seeking to renegotiate the leases for these properties or dispose of them.

In
addition, we own or lease approximately 640 switching centers/head-ends, operational hub-sites, and other types of network sites like points of presence, radio
sites and repeater nodes. We also own or lease warehouses and other non-operational properties, as well as various cable television, telephone and telecommunications equipment housed on
public and private sites.

In
addition, in the UK, for the purposes of our site leasing and broadcast transmission businesses, we own, lease, manage, license, share and have conditional options for or access to
approximately 1,526 UK tower, rooftop and third party-owned sites and have limited rights to access or acquire approximately 696 undeveloped sites. Our broadcast transmission business also has access
to approximately 550 broadcast transmitter sites which are owned by Crown. Crown also leases sites from us. Our co-leasing and mutual site-sharing relationship with Crown was
formalized by the site-sharing agreement entered into in 1991 in respect of Crown's and our analog transmission businesses. Each site license granted pursuant to the site sharing agreement
is for an initial period expiring on December 31, 2005. Each site sharing agreement provides that, if requested by the sharing party, it will be extended for further periods. Either party may
terminate the agreement by giving five years' written notice until December 31, 2005, or at any date which is a date ten years or a multiple of ten years after December 31, 2005. With
respect to digital broadcast services, we and Crown are negotiating a formal arrangement pending finalization of a separate digital site sharing agreement which is envisaged to be on terms similar to
the existing analog site sharing agreement. Presently we are operating under an informal arrangement pending finalization of the formal arrangement. Although we believe a formal arrangement will be
concluded successfully, we cannot be certain of that conclusion.

44

---

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

NTL Europe and some of its former officers, including Barclay Knapp, our former president and chief executive officer, have been named as defendants in a number
of purported securities class action lawsuits and one individual action brought by former NTL Europe stockholders. The complaints in those cases generally allege that the defendants failed to disclose
NTL Europe's financial condition, finances and future prospects accurately in press releases and other communications with investors prior to filing its Chapter 11 case in federal court. The
defendants filed motions to dismiss the actions and, on July 31, 2003, the court entered an order dismissing the complaint in the individual action without prejudice to filing an amended
complaint and deferred its decision on the complaint in the class action lawsuits. On August 20, 2003, the plaintiff in the individual action filed an amended complaint. The defendants filed
motions to dismiss the amended complaint in the individual actions. Accordingly the motions to dismiss all actions are now currently pending. We do not know of any facts that would support these
allegations, and the defendants have informed us that they intend to defend these lawsuits vigorously. While NTL Europe has been released from personal monetary liability in these actions as a result
of the completion of the Plan, the case remains pending against NTL Europe and the individuals named as defendants. We have not been named as a defendant. The cases have been consolidated for all
purposes before the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. We may be liable for indemnification claims from some of our officers and directors, including Mr. Knapp, to the
extent our insurance coverage is insufficient.

The
two separate proceedings that were initiated in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York by Owl Creek Asset Management, L.P. and JMB Capital Partners, L.P.
requesting that we be held liable for alleged damages attributable to each of their trading in our "when-issued" common stock prior to the completion of the Plan have been voluntarily
dismissed by the plaintiffs in June 2003 without prejudice to recommencement in state court where related litigation against third parties is pending. The third parties are primarily the
counterparties to the various trades made by Owl Creek Asset Management, L.P. and JMB Capital Partners, L.P. To date, neither Owl Creek Asset Management, L.P. nor JMB Capital Partners, L.P. has
recommenced an action in state court against us.

We
are involved in various other disputes and litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business. None of these matters are expected to have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operation or cash flow.

45

---

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There were no matters that were submitted to a vote of our stockholders during the quarter ended December 31, 2003.

46

---



PART II

Item 5.    Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

(a)Market Information

Our shares are traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "NTLI". Until January 10, 2003, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of NTL
Europe, Inc. Accordingly, our shares were not publicly traded prior to that time. The following table sets forth the reported high low price per share of our common stock on the Nasdaq National
Market for the periods indicated.

|                                       |  | Price per share
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|
|2003                                   |  |                
|First Quarter (from January 13)        |  | $              
|Second Quarter                         |  | $              
|Third Quarter                          |  | $              
|Fourth Quarter                         |  | $              
|2004                                   |  |                
|First Quarter (through March 10, 2004) |  | $              

Holders

As of March 10, 2004, our transfer agent informed us that there were approximately 46 record holders of our common stock, although there is a larger number
of beneficial owners.

Dividends

Since our inception, we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain any earnings for use in the operation and
expansion of our business and for debt service and, therefore, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Please refer to the section of this annual report titled "Risk
FactorsWe do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future" for a discussion of the legal and contractual restrictions on our ability to declare and pay cash
dividends.

47

---

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

The selected consolidated financial information of NTL Incorporated presented below under the captions income statement data for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999, and January 1, 2003, and balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999 was derived from our consolidated
financial statements audited by Ernst & Young LLP. This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and the information contained in
our Management Discussion and Analysis appearing elsewhere in this annual report. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results.

We
operated our business as a debtor-in possession subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court beginning on May 8, 2002, the date that we, NTL Europe and
certain of our and NTL Europe's subsidiaries filed the Plan under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code, until January 10, 2003. Accordingly, we have prepared our consolidated financial
statements in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 90-7, "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy
Code" or SOP 90-7.

Upon
emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization and in accordance with the Plan, all of our outstanding public notes were canceled other than the notes issued by Diamond Holdings and NTL
Triangle and we acquired all of the outstanding public notes of Diamond Cable Communications Limited. In connection with our emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, certain of our subsidiaries and
we issued $558.2 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of 19% Senior Secured Notes due 2010, or Exit Notes, on January 10, 2003. Initial purchasers of our Exit Notes also
purchased 500,000 shares of our common stock on that date. The gross proceeds from the sale of the Exit Notes and such shares totaled $500.0 million.

We
adopted fresh-start reporting upon our emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization in accordance with SOP 90-7. For financial reporting purposes, the effects of the
completion of the Plan as well as adjustments for fresh-start reporting have been recorded as of January 1, 2003. Pursuant to fresh-start reporting, a new entity was deemed created for
financial reporting purposes. The carrying values of our assets were adjusted to their reorganization values, which are equivalent to their estimated fair values at January 1, 2003. The
carrying values of our liabilities were adjusted to their present values at January 1, 2003. The term "Predecessor Company" refers to our subsidiaries and us for periods prior to and including
December 31, 2002. The term "Reorganized Company" refers to our subsidiaries and us for periods subsequent to January 1, 2003. The effects of the completion of the Plan
as well as adjustments for fresh-start reporting recorded as of January 1, 2003 are Predecessor Company transactions. All other results of operations on January 1, 2003 are Reorganized
Company transactions.

On
November 17, 2003, we completed a rights offering, pursuant to which 35,853,465 shares of our common stock were issued. In connection with the Rights Offering, we received
gross proceeds of $1,434 million. From the net proceeds of approximately $1,367 million, we repaid in full all obligations under our Exit Notes and, together with cash on hand, our
working capital facility. In addition, we used part of the net proceeds as inter-company funding to one of our subsidiaries and the balance for general corporate expenses.

We
have one stock-based employee compensation plan. Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation(SFAS No. 123). We selected the prospective method of adoption allowed by FASB Statement
No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure(SFAS No. 148). Accordingly, the recognition
provisions will be applied to all employee awards granted, modified or settled after January 1, 2003. In the year ended December 31, 2003, we recognized $13.0 million of stock-
based compensation.

48

---

Pursuant
to SOP 90-7, beginning on May 8, 2002 we ceased accruing interest expense on certain of our pre-petition obligations. Our reported interest
expense in 2002 excludes $645.2 million of contractual interest for the period from May 8, 2002 to December 31, 2002. Also in 2002, recapitalization expenses were
$152.9 million. Recapitalization expenses include all transactions incurred as a result of our Chapter 11 reorganization. Recapitalization expenses include $36.2 million for employee
retention related to substantially all of our UK employees and $116.7 million for financial advisory, legal, accounting and consulting costs.

In
addition, in 2002 we recorded asset impairment charges of $445.1 million consisting of non-cash charges to write down certain fixed assets of $56.0 million,
license acquisition costs of $29.0 million and goodwill of $360.1 million. We also recorded restructuring charges of $104.8 million and non-cash charges of
$284.4 million primarily for allowances for the cancellation of receivables from NTL Europe in accordance with the Plan. Amortization expense in 2002 decreased from amounts in prior periods
owing to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (referred to as SFAS) No. 142 on January 1, 2002 which ended the amortization of goodwill and other indefinite lived
intangible assets.

As
of December 31, 2001, $14,203.0 million of our long-term debt was classified as current owing to the uncertainties about compliance with the terms and
conditions of the instruments and agreements governing our debt that would give the holders of the debt the right to accelerate payment. In the fourth quarter of 2001, we recorded asset impairment
charges totaling $8,161.6 million
including goodwill of $8,077.8 million, license acquisition costs of $58.8 million, customer lists of $9.1 million, other intangibles of $14.9 million and investments in
affiliates of $1.0 million. In addition, in 2001 we recorded restructuring costs of $202.8 million, integration and consulting costs of $95.1 million and a loss on the sale of the
ConsumerCo off-net indirect access customers of $88.5 million.

In
May 2000, NTL Europe purchased ConsumerCo for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $13.1 billion, including intangibles of approximately $8.9 billion. We
subsequently acquired ConsumerCo from NTL Europe. The net assets and results of operations of ConsumerCo are included in the consolidated financial statements beginning in May 2000. Also in
2000, we recorded restructuring charges of $65.9 million and costs of $26.8 million primarily to integrate acquired companies, mostly related to information technology integration as
well as costs incurred for business rationalization consulting.

In
March 1999, we purchased Diamond Cable Communications Limited, referred to as Diamond in this annual report, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$984.6 million, including intangibles of approximately $1.3 billion. In July 1999, we purchased Cablelink Limited, referred to as Cablelink, for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $700.5 million, including intangibles of approximately $669.6 million. In September 1999, NTL Delaware purchased NTL Business for an aggregate purchase price of
$175.0 million, including intangibles of approximately $176.9 million. We subsequently acquired NTL Business from NTL Delaware. The net assets and results of operations of Diamond,
Cablelink and NTL Business are included in the consolidated financial statements from March 1999, July 1999 and September 1999, their respective dates of acquisition. In
August 1999, Telewest Communications plc exercised its right to purchase all of our shares of Cable London PLC

49

---

and
all of our related rights and interests for a purchase price of approximately £428.0 million. We recorded a gain of $493.1 million on this sale.

|                                                                                       |  | Year Ended December 31, |        
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | -------
|
|
|
|Income Statement Data:                                                                 |  |                         |        
|Revenues                                                                               |  | $                       | 3,645.2
|Operating (loss)                                                                       |  |                         | (278.2 
|Net (loss)                                                                             |  |                         | (954.2 
|Basic and diluted net (loss) per common share (pro forma for periods prior to 2003)(1) |  | ($                      | 15.10  
|                                                                                       |  |                         |        
|Weighted average number of shares (pro forma for periods prior to 2003)(1)             |  |                         | 63.2   
|                                                                                       |  |                         |        

|                                                           |  |  |  | January 1,
2003
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------
|
|Revenues                                                   |  |  |  | $              
|Operating income                                           |  |  |  |                
|Net income                                                 |  |  |  |                
|Pro forma basic and diluted net income per common share(1) |  |  |  | $              
|                                                           |  |  |  |                
|Pro forma weighted average shares(1)                       |  |  |  |                
|                                                           |  |  |  |                

---

|                                                 |  | As of December 31,
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------
|
|
|
|Balance Sheet Data:                              |  |                   
|Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities |  | $                 
|Working Capital                                  |  |                   
|Fixed assets                                     |  |                   
|Total Assets                                     |  |                   
|Long-term debt(1)                                |  |                   
|Shareholders' equity (deficit)                   |  |                   

---

50

---



Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Overview

On January 10, 2003, we emerged from reorganization under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. As part of the Plan, we reduced our indebtedness
significantly and changed our name from NTL Communications Corp. to NTL Incorporated.

We
are a leading broadband and communications services company in the UK and the Republic of Ireland based on total residential subscriber numbers. We provide our services to our
customers through five reportable segments.



Our
reportable segments are supported by various central shared services including ntl: networks, which manages our UK national network. Other shared services include finance, IT and
human resources. ntl: Ireland relies upon these central shared services to a lesser extent than our other reportable segments.

51

---

Our
revenues and segment profit (loss) in dollars and UK pounds as well as segment profit as a percentage of revenues for each of our reportable segments and shared services division for
the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 were as follows:

|                                                    |                 | Year ended December 31, |        
|--------------------------------------------------- | --------------- | ----------------------- | -------
|
|
|Revenues:                                           |                 |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: home       |                         | $      
|                                                    | ntl: business   |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: broadcast  |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: carriers   |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: Ireland    |                         |        
|                                                    |                 |                         |        
|Total revenues                                      |                 | $                       | 3,645.2
|                                                    |                 |                         |        
|Segment profit (loss)                               |                 |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: home       |                         | $      
|                                                    | ntl: business   |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: broadcast  |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: carriers   |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: Ireland    |                         |        
|                                                    | Shared services |                         |        
|                                                    |                 |                         |        
|Combined segment profit                             |                 | $                       | 1,199.1
|                                                    |                 |                         |        
|Segment profit as a percentage of revenues:         |                 |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: home       |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: business   |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: broadcast  |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: carriers   |                         |        
|                                                    | ntl: Ireland    |                         |        
|                                                    | Shared services |                         |        
|                                                    |                 |                         |        
|Combined segment profit as a percentage of revenues |                 |                         |        
|                                                    |                 |                         |        

Revenues

The principal sources of revenues within each reportable segment are:



52

---



Expenses

The principal components of our operating costs and selling, general and administrative expenses include:



Segment Profit (Loss)

Our primary measure of profit or loss for each of our reportable segments is segment profit (loss). Our management, including our chief executive officer who is
our chief operating decision maker, considers segment profit (loss) an important indicator of the operational strength and performance of our reportable segments. Segment profit (loss) for each
reportable segment and the shared services division excludes the impact of costs and expenses that either do not directly affect our cash flows or do not directly relate to the operating performance
of that segment or division. These costs and expenses include:



Other
charges, including restructuring charges, recapitalization expenses and other losses are also excluded from segment profit (loss) as management believes they are not characteristic
of our underlying business operations. Furthermore management believes that some of the components of these charges are not directly related to the performance of a single reportable segment.

We
also measure combined segment profit, which represents the combined measure of the segment profit (loss) from each of our reportable segments and our shared services division.
Combined segment profit is not a financial measure under United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. A discussion relating to use of this measure is set forth below under
"Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures."

Combined
segment profit (loss) should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, operating profit (loss), net income (loss) and other measures of financial performance
reported in accordance with GAAP.

53

---

Segment Reorganization.During 2003, we implemented a reorganization of our reportable segments by
moving some operations between reportable segments. The segmental structure described above represents the results of our realignment. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current reportable segments reflecting this reorganization.

Factors Affecting Our Business

ntl: home.Our ntl: home segment accounts for the majority of our total revenues. The revenues of
ntl: home are driven by the number of customers, the number and types of services which each customer uses and the prices we charge for these services. Our segment profit is driven by the relative
margins on the types of services we provide to customers. For example, broadband Internet is more profitable than ATV. Our packaging of services and pricing are designed to encourage our customers to
use multiple services like dual telephone and broadband. The factors impacting our ntl: home segment include customer churn, average revenue per user, or ARPU, and competition.

Summary customer statistics

Selected statistics in respect of customers connected directly to our network for ntl: home for the three months ended December 31, 2003 as well as the
four prior quarters are set forth in the table below.

|                                   |                          | Three months ended |          
|---------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ------------------ | ---------
|
|Total customers                    |                          | 2,867,900          |          
|                                   | Gross Customer additions |                    | 153,900  
|                                   | Customer disconnects     |                    | 95,500   
|                                   | Net customer movement    |                    | 58,400   
|Churn (annualized)(1)              |                          | 13.2%              |          
|Revenue generating units(2)        |                          | 5,497,800          |          
|                                   | Television               |                    | 2,023,600
|                                   |                          | DTV                |          
|                                   | Telephone                |                    | 2,525,000
|                                   | Broadband                |                    | 949,200  
|Internet dial-up and DTV access(3) |                          | 420,700            |          
|Average revenue per user(4)        |                          | £41.96             |          

---

54

---

Customer Churn.An increase in our customer churn can lead to increased costs and reduced revenues. We continue to focus on
improving our customer service and enhancing and expanding our service offerings to existing customers in an effort to manage our customer churn rate. Customer churn is a measure of the number of
customers who stop using our services. Our annualized customer churn rate is calculated by dividing the number of customers lost in the most recent quarter, multiplied by four, by the average total
number of customers we serviced during that quarter. Although our ability to reduce our customer churn rate beyond a base level is limited by factors like customers moving outside our network service
area, in particular during the summer season, managing our customer churn rate is a significant component of our business plan. To help meet these objectives, we need to integrate our billing systems
and customer databases across our entire network. Although we are in the process of integrating our billing systems and customer databases, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in
reaching this goal. In addition, our customer churn rate may also increase if we are unable to deliver our services over our network without interruption.

ARPU.ARPU is a measure we use to evaluate how effectively we are realizing potential revenues from customers. ARPU is
calculated on a monthly basis by dividing total revenues generated from the provision of telephone, cable television and Internet services to customers who are directly connected to our network in
that month, exclusive of value added tax, by the average number of customers in that month. We compute the ARPU for any quarter by averaging the ARPU for each month in that quarter. We believe that
our "triple play" offering of telephone service, broadband access to the
Internet and DTV will prove attractive to our existing customer base and allow us to increase our ARPU by facilitating the sale of multiple services to each customer.

Competition.Our ability to acquire and retain customers and increase revenues depends on our competitive strength. There is
significant competition in our markets through digital satellite offered by BSkyB and digital terrestrial television offered by Freeview, as well as through alternative Internet access services, like
DSL, which is offered by BT. If competitive forces prevent us from charging the prices for these services that we plan to charge, or if our competition is able to attract our customers or potential
customers we are targeting, our results of operations will be adversely affected.

Capital Expenditures.Our business requires substantial capital expenditures on a continuing basis
for various purposes, including expanding and upgrading our network, investing in new customer acquisitions, and offering new services. If we do not continue to invest in our network, our ability to
retain and acquire customers may be hindered. Therefore, our liquidity and the availability of cash to fund capital projects are important drivers of our revenues. When our liquidity is restricted, so
is our ability to meet our capital expenditure requirements. We believe that our cash on hand, together with cash from operations, will be sufficient for our cash requirements through March 2005.
However, our cash requirements after that time may exceed, perhaps significantly, these sources of cash.

Currency Movements.We encounter currency exchange rate risks because substantially all of our
revenues and operating costs are earned and paid primarily in pounds and, to a lesser extent, euros, but we pay interest and principal obligations with respect to a portion of our existing
indebtedness in US dollars. To the extent that the pound declines in value against the US dollar, the effective cost of servicing our US dollar debt will be higher. Changes in the exchange rate result
in foreign currency gains or losses. As of December 31, 2003, $485.3 million (net of unamortized discount of $141.9 million), or 8.5% of our long-term debt, net of
unamortized discount, was in US dollars.

55

---

Because
revenues and expenses from our principal operations are denominated primarily in pounds but we report our financial results in US dollars, our financial results are also impacted
by currency fluctuations, which are unrelated to our underlying results of operations.

Seasonality.Certain revenue streams are subject to seasonal factors. For example, telephone usage
revenues in ntl: home and ntl: business tend to be slightly lower during summer holiday months. Our customer churn rates include persons who disconnect service owing to moves, resulting in a seasonal
increase in our churn rates during the summer months when higher levels of UK house moves occur and students leave their accommodations between school years.

Integration of Billing Systems.We are in the process of integrating our various billing systems and
customer databases in an effort to improve one of the main tools we use to provide customer service. We have numerous billing systems and customer databases owing to the many acquisitions we have
made. We are seeking to complete this integration by late 2004. The total project cost is estimated to be approximately £75 million, or $134 million, of which we incurred
approximately £55 million, or $98 million, through December 31, 2003. Approximately £33 million, or $59 million, of this amount was incurred
in 2003. If the integration is not successful, we could experience an adverse effect on our customer service, customer churn rate and costs of maintaining these systems going forward. We could also
experience operational failures related to billing and collecting revenues from our customers which, depending upon on the severity of the failure, could have a material adverse effect on our
business.

Acquisitions and Dispositions.In the fourth quarter of 2001, we sold the ConsumerCo
off-net indirect access business, which served customers not directly connected to our network. As a result, the consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31,
2001 include the results for this business for ten months.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements and related financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States, or GAAP. GAAP requires the use of estimates, assumptions, judgements and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenues and
expense amounts reported, as well as disclosures about contingencies, risks and financial condition. The following critical accounting policies have the potential to have a more significant impact on
our financial statements. An impact could occur because of the significance of the financial statement item to which these policies relate, or because these policies require more judgement and
estimation than other matters owing to the uncertainty related to measuring, at a specific point in time, transactions that are continuous in nature.

Foreign Currency Translation:

Our principal operating functional currencies are the UK pound and the euro, while our reporting currency is the US dollar. The assets and liabilities of our UK
and Ireland subsidiaries have been translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates, and revenues and expenses have been translated at the weighted average rates for the
respective years. Exchange gains and losses on translation of our net equity investments in our subsidiaries are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in
shareholders' equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recorded in the statements of operations.

Fixed Assets:



56

---



57

---



The following table illustrates the calculation of labor and overhead costs capitalized as a percentage of total operating costs and selling, general and administrative expenses and as a
percentage of cash used to purchase fixed assets.

|                                                                                                                               |  | Year Ended December 31, |        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------- | -------
|
|
|
|Labor and overhead costs capitalized                                                                                           |  | $                       | 124.4  
|Total operating costs and selling, general and administrative expenses                                                         |  |                         | 2,446.1
|Labor and overhead costs capitalized as a percentage of total operating costs and selling, general and administrative expenses |  |                         | 5.1    
|Purchase of fixed assets                                                                                                       |  |                         | 574.2  
|Labor and overhead costs capitalized as a percentage of purchase of fixed assets                                               |  |                         | 21.7   

Impairment of Long-lived Assets:

We review the carrying values of our long-lived assets, including fixed assets and amortizable definite lived intangible assets, for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable. We assess the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, by first
grouping our long-lived assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and
liabilities (the asset group) and, secondly, estimating the undiscounted future cash flows that are directly associated with and expected to arise from the use of and eventual disposition of such
asset group. We estimate the undiscounted cash flows over the remaining useful life of the primary asset within the asset group. If the carrying value of the asset group exceeds the estimated
undiscounted cash flows, we record an impairment charge to the extent the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. We determine fair value through quoted market
prices in active markets or, if quoted market prices are unavailable, through the performance of internal analysis of discounted cash flows or external appraisals. The undiscounted and discounted cash
flow analyses are based on a number of estimates and assumptions, including the expected period over which the asset will be utilized, projected future operating results of the asset group, discount
rate and long-term growth rate.

Reorganization
value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets, goodwill, license acquisition costs and other intangible assets that are not amortized are reviewed for
impairment each year.

As
of December 31, 2003, we reviewed our long-lived assets for impairment. We engaged an independent financial adviser to assist in the impairment review. The
independent financial adviser and we determined that there was no impairment of our long-lived assets as of December 31, 2003. This determination was based upon various valuation
methods, including discounted cash flow analysis, selected comparable market multiples of publicly traded companies and other applicable ratios and economic information relevant to our operations.
Certain factors that were incorporated into the impairment review included the following:



58

---



Our
assessments of impairment of long-lived assets and our periodic review of the remaining useful lives of our long-lived assets are an integral part of our
ongoing strategic review of the business and operations. Future changes in our strategy and other changes in our operations could impact the projected future operating results that are inherent in our
estimates of fair value, resulting in impairments in the future. Additionally, other changes in the estimates and assumptions, including the discount rate and expected long-term growth
rate, which drive the valuation techniques employed to estimate the fair value of long-lived assets could change and, therefore, impact the assessments of impairment in the future.

Revenue:

We recognize revenue only when it is realized or realizable and earned. We recognize revenue when all of the following are present:



Revenues
are invoiced and recorded as part of a periodic billing cycle, and are recognized as the services are provided. At the end of each period, adjustments are recorded to defer
revenue relating to services billed in advance and to accrue for earned but unbilled services.



59

---



Pensions:

We account for our defined benefit pension plans using Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, SFAS No. 87,Employers'
Accounting for Pensionsand the disclosure rules under SFAS No. 132 (Revised)Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits, an Amendment of FASB Statements 87, 88 and 106. Under SFAS No. 87, pension expense is recognized on an accrual basis over
employees' approximate service periods. Pension expense calculated under SFAS No. 87 is generally independent of funding decisions or requirements. We recognized expense for our defined
benefit pension plans of $15.4 million and $10.4 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively. We expect our pension expense to be approximately $11.9 million in 2004.

The
calculation of pension expense and our pension liability requires the use of a number of assumptions. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability
amounts, and future actual experience can differ from the assumptions. We believe that the two most critical assumptions are the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the
assumed discount rate.

When
calculating pension expense for 2003, we assumed that plan assets would generate a long-term rate of return of between 6.6% and 7.9%. This range is lower than the
assumed rates of between 7.0% and 7.9% used to calculate the 2002 expense. We determine our expected long-term rate of return assumption based on historical experience and by evaluating
input from the trustee managing the plans' assets, including the trustee's review of asset class return expectations by several consultants and economists as well as long-term inflation
assumptions. Our expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on a target allocation of assets, which is based on our goal of earning the highest rate of return while
maintaining risk at acceptable levels. The plan strives to have assets sufficiently diversified so that adverse or unexpected results from one security class will not have an unduly detrimental impact
on the entire portfolio.

We
discounted our future pension obligations using rates of between 5.5% and 6.0% at December 31, 2003 and rates of between 5.9% and 6.0% for 2002. We determined the appropriate
discount rate based on the current rates earned on long-term bonds that receive one of the two highest ratings given by a recognized rating agency. The pension liability and future pension
expense both increase as the discount rate is reduced. Lowering the discount rate by 0.5% would increase our pension liability at December 31, 2003 by approximately $16.4 million and
increase our estimated 2004 pension expense by approximately $3.6 million.

Future
changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the participants in our pension plans will impact our future pension expense and
liabilities. We cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.

At
December 31, 2003, projected benefit obligations of all of our pension plans exceed plan assets by $156.9 million. We will need to fund these deficits in accordance with
the laws and regulations of the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. We expect to contribute a total of approximately £14.9 million ($26.6 million) during 2004, of
which £13.0 million ($23.2 million) relates to the largest of our defined benefit pension plans.

Other Policies:



60

---



These
policies may need to be revised in the future in the event that changes to our business occur.

Consolidated Results of Operations

Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002

Revenues

For the year ended December 31, 2003, consolidated revenues increased by 11.6% to $3,645.2 million from $3,265.1 million in 2002. Revenues
expressed in UK pounds increased by 2.6% to £2,229.7 million from £2,173.2 million. Revenues in our ntl: home segment increased by
£70.4 million driven by an increase in broadband Internet services and additional customers. Revenues in ntl: Ireland rose by £12.6 million owing primarily to
price increases, more DTV customers and higher business sector revenues. Revenues in our ntl: broadcast segment increased by £11.3 million owing primarily to higher revenues from
radio communications services to the public safety sector. These increases were offset by a decline of £30.6 million in revenues in our ntl: business segment, primarily owing to
fewer customers, and a decline of £7.2 million in revenues in our ntl: carriers segment, primarily because of the downturn in the market for wholesale telecommunications services.

Expenses

Operating Costs.For the year ended December 31, 2003, operating costs, including network expenses, increased by 2.9%
to $1,545.9 million from $1,502.5 million in 2002, and operating costs expressed in UK pounds decreased by 5.4% to £945.6 million from
£1,000.1 million. Operating costs as a percentage of revenues declined to 42.4% for the year ended December 31, 2003, from 46.0% for 2002. The decrease in operating costs as
a percentage of revenue was primarily a result of reductions in television programming costs because of renegotiated contracts, which included expanded channel line ups, and in telephone
interconnection costs as a result of our effort to route our outbound traffic more effectively and the recent OFTEL ruling related to mobile interconnect cost reductions. These savings were
principally attributable to our ntl: home segment. In addition, we have experienced lower costs within our ntl: business segment as we continue to focus on a smaller but more profitable customer base.
We have also benefited from a release of certain accruals in respect of the favorable resolution of billing matters with certain providers of interconnect related services in ntl:home and
ntl:business. Finally, we benefited from a reduction in charges from local authorities in respect of rates payable on our network principally in ntl: home.

These
reductions have been partly offset by the expensing of costs that are no longer applicable to capital activities and therefore no longer capitalized, together with the impact of
the release of certain balance sheet provisions in 2002 which were not repeated in 2003.

61

---

Selling, general and administrative expenses.For the year ended December 31, 2003, selling, general and
administrative expenses increased by 14.2% to $900.2 million from $788.5 million in 2002, and selling, general and administrative expenses expressed in UK pounds increased by 4.9% to
£550.7 million from £524.8 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 24.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2003, from 24.1% for 2002. The increase in these expenses was primarily due to higher marketing and selling activities in 2003, principally within ntl: home, which were curtailed
in 2002 as a result of our reorganization. In addition, employee costs associated with incentive compensation plans increased in 2003 compared with 2002. These include increased bonus costs as a
result of performance achievements above target, introduction of a long term incentive plan, and the adoption of SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock Based
Compensation." Also, contributing are increased pension costs in respect of our defined benefit schemes. Finally, as set forth above, selling, general and administrative costs
have increased because of the expensing of costs that are no longer applicable to capital activities and therefore no longer capitalized, and the release of certain balance sheet provisions in 2002 as
discussed below which were not repeated in 2003.

These
increases have been offset by savings arising from our successful renegotiation of our contract with IBM for outsourced IT services, together with reduced employee costs in ntl:
business as a result of the restructuring at the end of 2002 and during 2003. In addition, we have also benefited from reduced ntl: home costs through lower allowances for doubtful accounts and other
operational savings, together with reduced property and facility costs in our shared services division.

Other Charges

Other charges of $40.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, include $36.7 million relating to restructuring charges for employee
severance and related costs and $4.0 million in respect of professional fees. Restructuring charges of $36.7 million comprised new charges of $43.2 million less releases of
$6.5 million in respect of provisions no longer required. The net charges were incurred in respect of approximately 960 employees who were made redundant or terminated in the year ended
December 31, 2003, all of whom ceased employment by December 31, 2003.

Other
charges of $389.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2002 include restructuring charges of $104.8 million and non-cash charges of
$284.4 million, primarily for allowances for the cancellation of receivables from our former parent company and some of its subsidiaries in accordance with our restructuring under Chapter 11.
Restructuring charges of $104.8 million in 2002 relate to our actions to reorganize, re-size and reduce operating costs and create greater efficiency in various areas. An aggregate
of $7.5 million of the 2002 restructuring charges were for the write-off of equipment and other assets that are not in use and will not require any future cash outlays. Employee
severance and related costs in 2002 were related to approximately 740 employees to be terminated, of which approximately 350 employees were still employed by us as of December 31, 2002, but who
were

62

---

terminated
by December 31, 2003. The following table summarizes the restructuring charges incurred and utilized in 2002 and 2003 (in millions):

|                                                  |  | Employee
severance and
related costs |       | Lease
exit costs |   | Agreement
modifications |   | Other |       | Total |  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | ----- | ---------------- | - | ----------------------- | - | ----- | ----- | ----- | -
|Balance, December 31, 2001                        |  | $                                    | 72.5  |                  | $ | 33.5                    |   | $     | 27.7  |       | $
|Released                                          |  |                                      | (0.6  | )                |   | (15.1                   | ) |       | (11.5 | )     |  
|Charged to expense                                |  |                                      | 35.2  |                  |   | 78.9                    |   |       | 1.2   |       |  
|Utilized                                          |  |                                      | (87.5 | )                |   | (18.6                   | ) |       | (16.2 | )     |  
|                                                  |  |                                      |       |                  |   |                         |   |       |       |       |  
|Balance, December 31, 2002                        |  |                                      | 19.6  |                  |   | 78.7                    |   |       | 1.2   |       |  
|Foreign currency exchange translation adjustments |  |                                      | 1.6   |                  |   | 13.3                    |   |       | 0.1   |       |  
|Released                                          |  |                                      | (3.4  | )                |   | (1.2                    | ) |       | (0.3  | )     |  
|Charged to expense                                |  |                                      | 41.0  |                  |   | 0.8                     |   |       | 0.5   |       |  
|Utilized                                          |  |                                      | (58.8 | )                |   | (19.5                   | ) |       | (1.0  | )     |  
|                                                  |  |                                      |       |                  |   |                         |   |       |       |       |  
|Balance, December 31, 2003                        |  | $                                    |      |                  | $ | 72.1                    |   | $     | 0.5   |       | $
|                                                  |  |                                      |       |                  |   |                         |   |       |       |       |  

Depreciation expense

For the year ended December 31, 2003, depreciation expense decreased to $1,233.2 million from $1,477.9 million in 2002, primarily as a result
of the $2,498.0 million decrease in the carrying value of fixed assets subject to depreciation effective January 1, 2003. This decrease in carrying value of fixed assets was because of
the adoption of fresh-start reporting, which included a reassessment of the remaining useful lives of these assets.

Amortization expense

For the year ended December 31, 2003, amortization expense increased to $203.4 million from $63.7 million in 2002. This increase in
amortization expense was as a result of the $1,222.6 million increase in the carrying value of our customer lists as of January 1, 2003 because of the adoption of fresh-start reporting,
and which are being amortized over 3 to 12 years.

Interest expense

For the year ended December 31, 2003, interest expense decreased to $746.4 million from $780.2 million in 2002, primarily as a result of the
cancellation of $9,486.9 million of debt on January 10, 2003 in connection with our emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization. In the year ended December 31, 2002, interest expense
included interest on this debt only through to May 8, 2002. Pursuant to SOP 90-7, in the period from May 8, 2002 to December 31, 2002, interest expense was included in
the results of operations only to the extent that it would be paid during the bankruptcy proceeding or that it was probable that it would be an allowed priority, secured or unsecured claim.
Accordingly, interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2002 excluded $645.2 million of contractual interest. The saving in interest from the cancellation of debt on
January 10, 2003 was partly offset by:



63

---



We
paid interest in cash of $588.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, and $456.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. With respect to the
interest payment of $50.4 million on the Exit Notes due on July 1, 2003, we elected to pay the interest through the issuance of additional "pay-in-kind" notes. We
issued $56.1 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of Exit Notes with primarily the same terms as the original Exit Notes for the interest payment.

Recapitalization expense

For the year ended December 31, 2003 we had no recapitalization expense. For the year ended December 31, 2002, recapitalization expense was
$152.9 million. Recapitalization expense included all transactions incurred as a result of our Chapter 11 reorganization. This expense included $36.2 million for employee retention
related to substantially all of our UK employees and $116.7 million for financial advisory, legal, accounting and consulting costs.

Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)

Our principal operating functional currencies are the UK pound and the euro, while our reporting currency is the US dollar. The assets and liabilities of our UK
and Ireland subsidiaries have been translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates, and revenues and expenses have been translated at the weighted average rates for the
respective years. Exchange gains and losses on translation of our net equity investment in our subsidiaries are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in
shareholders' equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recorded in the statement of operations.

For
the year ended December 31, 2003, foreign currency transaction gains were $54.0 million as compared with losses of $94.1 million for 2002. These gains in 2003
were primarily because of the effect of changes in exchange rates on US dollar denominated debt of our subsidiaries, Diamond Holdings and NTL Triangle, whose functional currency is the UK
pound. Our results of operations will continue to be affected by foreign exchange rate fluctuations.

Income tax benefit (expense)

For the year ended December 31, 2003, income tax expense was $0.1 million as compared with income tax benefit of $25.7 million in 2002. The
2003 expense is composed of $1.6 million in US state and local income tax expense less $1.5 million of deferred non-US income tax benefit. None of the 2003
income tax, except a portion of the state and local tax, is expected to be payable in the next year.

64

---

Net (loss)

For the year ended December 31, 2003, net loss was $954.2 million as compared with a net loss of $2,375.8 million in 2002 The reduction in
net loss is attributable to:



Net (loss) per share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $15.10 and for the year ended December 31, 2002 was $39.93.
Basic and diluted net loss per common share for the
year ended December 31, 2002 is computed assuming the following shares were outstanding for these years: 50.0 million shares issued in connection with the Plan, 0.5 million shares
issued in connection with the issuance of the Exit Notes and 9.0 million shares as an adjustment to give effect to the impact of the rights offering.

Segment profit (loss)

ntl: home.For the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: home revenues increased by 14.2% to $2,442.5 million from
$2,139.0 million for 2002, and revenues expressed in UK pounds increased by 4.9% to £1,494.1 million from £1,423.7 million. This was primarily a result of
more customers subscribing to our broadband Internet services, an increase in our customer base, and the impact of price increases for our broadband Internet services and our cable television
services. We also increased our revenues from our wholesale Internet access services through arrangements with other UK ISPs. These increases were partly offset by a reduction in our
off-net revenues, primarily due to the cessation in the fourth quarter of 2002 of transition billing and other related services provided to the purchaser of the ConsumerCo
off-net indirect access business which we sold in November 2001.

For
the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: home segment profit increased by 24.2% to $1,101.6 million from $886.6 million for 2002, and segment profit expressed in
UK pounds increased by 14.2% to £673.8 million from £590.1million. This increase is primarily associated with higher revenues together with reductions in our cable
television program costs as a result of renegotiated contracts with content providers, which included expanded channel line ups, and in our telephone interconnect costs. Interconnect cost reductions
resulted from our effort to route our outbound telephony traffic more effectively and from OFTEL mandated reductions in mobile interconnect rates. In addition further operational efficiencies and cost
cutting including lower allowances for doubtful accounts owing to improved collection procedures, together with a reduction in amounts previously charged by local authorities in respect of rates
payable on our network, have increased ntl: home segment profit in the year ended December 31, 2003. In the fourth quarter of 2003 we also benefited from a release of certain accruals in
respect of the favorable resolution of billing matters with certain providers of interconnect related services.

These
cost reductions have been partly offset by the expensing of costs that are no longer applicable to capital activities and therefore no longer capitalized. In addition increased
sales and marketing costs, including related employee costs, have further reduced segment profit. These sales and

65

---

marketing
activities had been curtailed in 2002 as a result of our Chapter 11 reorganization. Other employee costs have also increased, partly because of increased bonus costs due to performance
achievements above target, and partly because of the introduction of a long-term incentive plan in 2003.

ntl: business.For the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: business revenues decreased by 1.8% to $461.2 million
from $469.8 million in 2002, and revenues expressed in UK pounds decreased by 9.8% to £282.1 million from £312.7 million. This decrease was primarily
because of fewer customers, major installations and orders as we executed our strategy of focusing on a smaller but more profitable customer base. This decrease in revenues was offset to some extent
by our selling of additional services to our existing customers. We expect to return our focus towards targeted profitable customer acquisitions in 2004. Initiatives are expected to include the
recruitment of a new sales team which will focus on winning new medium and large customers, and investigation and implementation of new indirect sales channels.

For
the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: business segment profit increased by 62.3% to $170.4 million from $105.0 million in 2002, and segment profit expressed in
UK pounds increased by 49.2% to £104.3 million from £69.9 million. This increase was primarily a result of reduced employee costs following a substantial
organizational restructuring of ntl: business at the end of 2002 and during 2003, together with the impact of further operational efficiencies and cost cutting. In addition we benefited from a release
of certain accruals in respect of the favorable resolution of billing matters with certain providers of interconnect related services, together with a reduction in amounts charged by BT in respect of
other interconnect services. The reductions in revenue described above did not have a material impact on segment profit because of the low profitability of these revenue streams.

These
increases in segment profit have been partially offset by the expensing of costs that are no longer applicable to capital activities and therefore no longer capitalized.

ntl: broadcast.For the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: broadcast revenues increased by 13.6% to
$439.2 million from $386.6 million in 2002, and revenues expressed in UK pounds increased by 4.4% to £268.6 million from £257.3 million. This was
primarily a result of higher revenues from delivery of radio communications services to the public safety sector. These arose principally from managed service contracts with six UK county police
forces for the migration from analog to digital communication systems together with the supply of radio equipment and associated project and technical labor to the Metropolitan Police. We also
generated additional revenues from the continued rollout of digital radio services and increases in site sharing, together with termination
payments from two satellite distribution services contracts amounting to approximately £2 million.

These
increases in revenues were partly offset by reduced media revenues because of a downturn in this market especially in the satellite distribution services sector, the slowing down
of installation services for cellular network rollouts, the termination of a contract to provide television program scheduling and transmission services, and the slowing down of public safety
maintenance services.

For
the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: broadcast segment profit increased by 13.8% to $188.7 million from $165.8 million in 2002, and segment profit expressed in
UK pounds increased by 4.7% to £115.5 million from £110.3 million. This was primarily as a result of the increased revenues described above together with savings
in employee costs following the reorganization of certain activities within the broadcast services and public safety business units.

ntl: carriers.For the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: carriers revenues increased by 2.3% to $183.8 million
from $179.7 million in 2002, and revenues expressed in UK pounds decreased by 6.0% to £112.4 million from £119.6 million. The primary reason for this
decline in revenues as expressed in UK pounds is excess capacity in the carriers market that adversely affected pricing during 2003 and hampered our ability to obtain new business. In addition, during
the year ended December 31, 2002,

66

---

ntl:
carriers was able to recognize some revenues, which had previously been deferred, as a result of the insolvency of certain customers which released us from our obligations under our contracts
with them. These revenues were not repeated for the year ended December 31, 2003. The decline in revenues as expressed in UK pounds from carrier services has been partially offset by increased
revenues from mobile telecommunications operators.

For
the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: carriers segment profit increased by 1.5% to $150.8 million from $148.6 million in 2002, and segment profit expressed in
UK pounds decreased by 6.8% to £92.2 million from £98.9 million. This decrease in segment profit as expressed in UK pounds was primarily owing to the decline in
revenues as expressed in UK pounds.

ntl: Ireland.For the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: Ireland revenues increased by 31.7% to $118.5 million
from $90.0 million in 2002, revenues expressed in UK pounds increased 21.0% to £72.5 million from £59.9 million, and revenues expressed in euros increased
by 10.1% to €104.8 million from €95.2 million. The primary reasons for the increase were more sales of premium services, including digital television, to
existing customers, a price increase that became effective in January 2003, and higher business sector revenues.

For
the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: Ireland segment profit increased by 87.4% to $41.6 million from $22.2 million in 2002, segment profit expressed in UK
pounds increased by 71.6% to £25.4 million from £14.8 million, and segment profit expressed in euros increased by 56.6% to €36.8 million
from €23.5 million. This was primarily owing to revenue growth together with a reduction in our bad debt charge as a result of our more rigorous credit policy. In addition
during the year ended December 31, 2003, we continued to focus on reducing our operating costs and also successfully renegotiated our contract with IBM for outsourced IT services, which
resulted in a reduction in rates charged. These costs reductions have been partly offset by increased employee costs including bonuses and the expensing of costs that are no longer applicable to
capital activities and therefore no longer capitalized.

ntl: shared services.For the year ended December 31, 2003, ntl: shared services loss increased by 28.2% to
$454.0 million from $354.1 million in 2002, and the loss expressed in UK pounds increased by 17.8% to £277.7 million from £235.7 million. This is
primarily owing to increases in our pension fund charges arising from the annual actuarial valuation of our defined benefit pension plans during the fourth quarter of 2002 together with increased
employee related costs. Additional employee related costs include increased bonus charges due to performance achievements above target, introduction of a long-term incentive scheme, stock
option compensation arising from our adoption of SFAS No. 123, and other stock compensation expense. Finally, releases of certain balance sheet provisions in 2002 as discussed below were
not repeated in 2003.

These
increases in shared services loss have been partly offset by savings resulting from the re-negotiation of our contract with IBM for outsourced IT services in the third
quarter of 2003. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2003, we reduced our property and related facility costs through further property rationalization and negotiated savings on our
facility contracts compared with 2002. We reduced network maintenance and related costs, and we reduced our healthcare costs from the higher levels experienced during the year ended
December 31, 2002 which were a result of increased claims following the significant employee redundancies announced during the fourth quarter of 2001.

Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

Revenues

For the year ended December 31, 2002, consolidated revenues increased by 2.4% to $3,265.1 million from $3,189.6 million for 2001, and
revenues expressed in UK pounds decreased by

67

---

1.9%
to £2,173.2 million from £2,216.1 million during the same period. This was primarily a result of the negative impact that uncertainties arising from our
Chapter 11 reorganization had on our revenues in ntl: business, together with a reduction in revenue following the sale of the ConsumerCo off-net indirect access telephone business in ntl:
home in the fourth quarter of 2001. These decreases were partially offset by increases in revenues in ntl: broadcast and ntl: Ireland.

Expenses

A review of a number of our balance sheet accounts during 2002 found that some provisions that were being held against anticipated liabilities were no longer
necessary. The release of these provisions resulted in a decrease in operating costs of $34.7 million, or £23.1 million, and a decrease in selling, general and administrative
expense of $34.6 million, or £23.0 million.

In
addition, in 2002 we engaged in a process of reducing our expenditures in a variety of areas including customer acquisitions and expenditures relating to certain capital improvements.
These measures, as well as the restructuring of our operations in 2001, which resulted in significant headcount reductions and departmental reorganizations, caused us to reassess whether for certain
2002 expenditures, assumptions related to the allocation of those costs between capital and operating expenses needed to be revised. This review was completed in the fourth quarter, resulting in a
£16.3 million ($24.5 million) increase in operating expenses and a £24.9 million ($37.4 million) increase in selling, general and administrative
expense and the corresponding reduction in fixed assets of £41.2 million ($61.9 million) in the three months ended December 31, 2002.

There
was no impact on cash in 2002 from either of these adjustments. These two adjustments relate principally to periods prior to the three months ended December 31, 2002. For
the first, second and third quarters of 2002, operating expenses would increase by approximately £4 million per quarter and selling, general and administrative expense would
increase by approximately £6 million per quarter if the reallocation of the £41.2 million from capitalized costs to expense was reflected in the appropriate
periods. The £43.4 million net adjustment would not be reallocated to the first, second and third quarters of 2002 because these provisions related to periods prior to 2002.

Operating expenses.For the year ended December 31, 2002, operating expenses, including network expenses, decreased by
4.0% to $1,502.5 million from $1,564.3 million for 2001, and expenses expressed in UK pounds decreased 8.0% to £1,000.1 million from
£1,086.9 million during the same period. Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues declined to 46.0% for the year ended December 31, 2002 from 49.0% for 2001. In
addition to the release of provisions explained above, this decrease in operating expenses was primarily a result of decreases in telephone interconnection costs by improving the routing of our
outbound traffic, and decreases in television programming costs due to renegotiated contracts which included expanded channel line ups.

Selling, general and administrative expenses.For the year ended December 31, 2002, selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased by 21.0% to $788.5 million from $997.5 million for 2001, and expenses expressed in UK pounds decreased by 24.3% to £524.8 million
from £693.0 million during the same period. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased to 24.1% for the year ended December 31, 2002
from 31.3% for 2001. This primarily reflects decreases in employee-related costs and sales and marketing expenses following various cost savings efforts, including restructurings that were announced
in the third and fourth quarters of 2001, together with the release of provisions explained above.

Asset impairments

Asset impairment charges were $445.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, and $8,160.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2001. Asset impairment charges of $445.1 million in 2002 are non-cash charges to write down some assets to their estimated fair values based on our

68

---

assessment
that their carrying value was not recoverable. These charges in 2002 included charges against fixed assets of $56.0 million, license acquisition costs of $29.0 million and
goodwill of $360.1 million. The charge with respect to fixed assets was estimated based upon the technological obsolescence of some network and other equipment. The charge with respect to
license acquisition costs and goodwill was determined in accordance with SFAS No. 142. Asset impairment charges of $8,160.6 million in 2001 included goodwill of $8,077.8 million,
license acquisition costs of $58.8 million, customer lists of $9.1 million and other intangibles of $14.9 million.

Non-cash compensation

Non-cash compensation of $30.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2001 was due to modifications to some stock options approved by
the Compensation and Option Committee of the Board of Directors of our former parent company in July 2001. All options to purchase shares of our former parent company's common stock were
cancelled on January 10, 2003 pursuant to the Plan.

Other charges

Other charges of $389.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2002 include restructuring charges of $104.8 million and non-cash
charges of $284.4 million, primarily for allowances for the cancellation of receivables from our former parent company and some of its subsidiaries in accordance with the Plan. Other charges of
$297.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2001 include restructuring charges of $202.8 million and costs of $95.1 million incurred primarily to integrate acquired
companies, mostly related to information technology integration as well as costs incurred for business rationalization consulting.

Restructuring
charges of $104.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 and $202.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 relate to our actions to
reorganize, re-size and reduce operating costs and create greater efficiency in various areas. An aggregate of $7.5 million of the 2002 restructuring charges and
$57.9 million of the 2001 restructuring charges were for the write-off of equipment and other assets that are not in use and will not require any future cash outlays. Employee
severance and related costs in 2001 were related to approximately 5,200 employees to be terminated, of which approximately 20 employees were still employed by us as of December 31, 2002. These
costs in 2002 were related to approximately 740 employees to be terminated, of which approximately 350 employees were still employed by us as of December 31, 2002, but who were all terminated
by December 31, 2003.

69

---

The
following table summarizes the restructuring charges incurred and utilized in 2001 and 2002 (in millions):

|                           |  | Employee
Severance
and Related
Costs |       | Lease
Exit
Costs |   | Agreement
Modifications |   | Fixed
Assets |       | Other |   | Total |  
|-------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | ----- | ---------------- | - | ----------------------- | - | ------------ | ----- | ----- | - | ----- | -
|Balance, December 31, 2000 |  | $                                    | 47.9  |                  | $ | 18.0                    |   | $            |      |       | $ |      |  
|2000 provision utilized    |  |                                      | (41.3 | )                |   | (9.6                    | ) |              |      |       |   |      |  
|2000 provision released    |  |                                      | (6.6  | )                |   | (7.3                    | ) |              |      |       |   |      |  
|Charged to expense         |  |                                      | 98.7  |                  |   | 32.4                    |   |              | 27.7  |       |   | 57.9  |  
|2001 provision utilized    |  |                                      | (26.2 | )                |   |                        |   |              |      |       |   | (57.9 | )
|                           |  |                                      |       |                  |   |                         |   |              |       |       |   |       |  
|Balance, December 31, 2001 |  |                                      | 72.5  |                  |   | 33.5                    |   |              | 27.7  |       |   |      |  
|2000 provision utilied     |  |                                      |      |                  |   | (1.1                    | ) |              |      |       |   |      |  
|2001 provision utilized    |  |                                      | (71.9 | )                |   | (17.3                   | ) |              | (16.2 | )     |   |      |  
|2001 provision released    |  |                                      | (0.6  | )                |   | (15.1                   | ) |              | (11.5 | )     |   |      |  
|Charged to expense         |  |                                      | 35.2  |                  |   | 78.9                    |   |              | 1.2   |       |   | 7.5   |  
|2002 provision utilized    |  |                                      | (15.6 | )                |   | (0.2                    | ) |              |      |       |   | (7.5  | )
|                           |  |                                      |       |                  |   |                         |   |              |       |       |   |       |  
|Balance, December 31, 2002 |  | $                                    | 19.6  |                  | $ | 78.7                    |   | $            | 1.2   |       | $ |      |  
|                           |  |                                      |       |                  |   |                         |   |              |       |       |   |       |  

Depreciation

Depreciation expense increased to $1,477.9 million in 2002 from $1,361.4 million in 2001 primarily due to an increase in depreciation of
telecommunications and cable television equipment due to purchases of fixed assets during 2002.

Amortization

Amortization expense decreased to $63.7 million in 2002 from $1,178.9 million in 2001 due to the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on
January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 142 ended the amortization of goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets. Amortization expense in the year ended December 31, 2001, after
deducting the amortization of goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets of $1,104.9 million, would have been $74.0 million but for the application of SFAS No. 142.

Interest expense

Interest expense decreased to $780.2 million in 2002 from $1,240.8 million in 2001 as a result of the application of SOP 90-7. Pursuant
to SOP 90-7, interest expense is included in the results of operations only to the extent that it will be paid during the bankruptcy proceeding or that it is probable that it will be an
allowed priority, secured or unsecured claim. In accordance with SOP 90-7, we did not recognize interest expense on some of our outstanding publicly traded notes on or after May 8,
2002, the date some of our subsidiaries and we filed our Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Our contractual interest for the year ended December 31, 2002 was
$1,425.4 million. The increase in contractual interest expense in 2002 as compared with 2001 is primarily due to additional borrowings under credit facilities and the issuance of new notes in
2001. Interest of $456.3 million was paid in cash in the year ended December 31, 2002 and interest of $844.3 million was paid in cash in the year ended December 31, 2001.

70

---

Other (losses)

Other losses of $88.5 million in 2001 are from the sale in the fourth quarter of 2001 of the ConsumerCo off-net indirect access business, which
served customers not directly connected to our network.

Foreign currency gains (losses)

Our principal operating functional currencies are the UK pound and the euro, while our reporting currency is the US dollar. The assets and liabilities of our UK
and Ireland subsidiaries have been translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates, and revenues and expenses have been translated at the weighted average rates for the
respective years. Exchange gains and losses on translation of our net equity investment in our subsidiaries are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in
shareholders' equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recorded in the statement of operations.

Foreign
currency transaction losses were $94.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2002 compared with foreign currency gains of $0.6 million in the year ended
December 31, 2001. The change was primarily owing to the appreciation of the dollar against UK pounds.

Recapitalization expense

Recapitalization expense was $152.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2002. Recapitalization expense includes all transactions incurred as a
result of our Chapter 11 reorganization. Recapitalization expense includes $36.2 million for employee retention related to substantially all of our UK employees and $116.7 million for
financial advisory, legal, accounting and consulting costs.

Income tax benefit (expense)

Income tax benefit in 2002 of $25.7 million related to a reduction of $1.2 million in state and local income tax and a reduction of
$24.5 million in deferred tax liabilities attributable to foreign subsidiaries. Income tax expense in 2001 of $118.1 million included an adjustment related to 1997 through 2000 of
approximately $116.1 million that is primarily attributable to additional tax depreciation being claimed during 2001 on original and amended income tax returns.

Net (loss)

Net loss was $2,375.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2002 and $11,837.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2001. This
change was the result of the factors discussed above.

Segment profit (loss)

ntl: home.For the year ended December 31, 2002, ntl: home revenues increased by 2.8% to $2,139.0 million from
$2,080.5 million for 2001, and revenues expressed in UK pounds decreased by 1.5% to £1,423.7 million from £1,445.5 million during the same period. This was
primarily a result of the sale of the ConsumerCo off-net indirect access business in November 2001 that accounted for approximately £46.0 million of consolidated
revenues in the year ended December 31, 2001. During 2002, ntl: home placed more focus on retention of existing customers and curtailed its spending on acquisition of new customers.
Consequently, the customer base declined during 2002, leading to lower revenues. The effect of this decrease in customers was partially offset by price increases and an increase in the number of
customers subscribing to our broadband Internet services.

For
the year ended December 31, 2002, ntl: home segment profit increased by 40.2% to $886.6 million from $632.6 million for 2001, and segment profit expressed in UK
pounds increased by 34.3% to £590.1 million from £439.5 million during the same period. This was primarily due to

71

---

reductions
in ntl: home's expenses which offset the decreases in revenues resulting in an increase in segment profit margin from 30.4% in 2001 to 41.4% in 2002. These expenses decreased primarily due
to changes in the mix of our revenues towards services with lower marginal costs, combined with savings in our television programming costs and telephone interconnect costs. We increased the number of
customers subscribing to our broadband Internet services although this increase was partially offset by reductions in the number of customers subscribing to cable television and telephone services
from us. Finally, segment profit was also adversely affected by the sale of the ConsumerCo off-net indirect access business in the fourth quarter of 2001 by approximately
£11 million.

In
addition, lower employee-related costs following our organizational restructuring in the fourth quarter of 2001, together with further operational efficiencies and cost cutting,
including a reduction in our sales and marketing costs, resulted in lower expenses in 2002 compared with 2001.

ntl: business.For the year ended December 31, 2002, ntl: business revenues decreased by 8.8% to $469.8 million
from $515.0 million for 2001, and revenues expressed in UK pounds decreased by 12.6% to £312.7 million from £357.8 million during the same period. This was
primarily the result of uncertainties arising from our Chapter 11 reorganization activities in 2002, together with our decision to stop selling a number of our less profitable products.

For
the year ended December 31, 2002, ntl: business segment profit decreased by 1.4% to $105.0 million from $106.5 million for 2001, and segment profit expressed in
UK pounds decreased by 5.5% to £69.9 million from £74.0 million during the same period. The main reason for this decline was the decrease in ntl: business
revenues, partly offset by lower expenses principally due to lower employee costs following our organizational restructuring during 2001, together with the impact of further operational efficiencies
and cost cutting.

ntl: broadcast.For the year ended December 31, 2002, ntl: broadcast revenues increased by 9.9% to
$386.6 million from $351.8 million for 2001, and revenues expressed in UK pounds increased by 5.3% to £257.3 million from £244.4 million during the
same period. This was primarily a result of an increase in digital radio rollout and additional project revenues. In addition, strong demand for tower site rental was sustained throughout 2002 from
all five major mobile operators, resulting in a further increase in revenues.

For
the year ended December 31, 2002, ntl: broadcast segment profit increased by 15.6% to $165.8 million from $143.4 million for 2001, and segment profit expressed
in UK pounds increased by 10.7% to £110.3 million from £99.6 million during the same period. This was primarily a result of increased revenues.

ntl: carriers.For the year ended December 31, 2002, ntl: carriers revenues decreased marginally to
$179.7 million from $180.0 million for 2001, and revenues expressed in UK pounds decreased 4.4% to £119.6 million from £125.1 million during the
same period. This decline was largely a result of a significant downturn in the carrier market, partially offset by growth in the mobile market.

For
the year ended December 31, 2002, ntl: carriers segment profit increased by 2.4% to $148.6 million from $145.1 million for 2001, and segment profit expressed in
UK pounds decreased by 1.9% to £98.9 million from £100.8 million during the same period. This small decrease was primarily due to the fall in revenues.

ntl: Ireland.For the year ended December 31, 2002, ntl: Ireland revenues increased by 44.5% to $90.0 million
from $62.3 million for the same period of 2001, revenues expressed in UK pounds increased by 38.3% to £59.9 million from £43.3 million during the same
period, and revenues expressed in euros increased by 36.8% to €95.2 million from €69.6 million during the same period. This was primarily a result of
price increases on our television services and selling more services to our existing customers, including the migration of customers from analog to digital television.

72

---

For
the year ended December 31, 2002, ntl: Ireland segment profit increased by 115.5% to $22.2 million from $10.3 million for 2001, segment profit expressed in UK
pounds increased by 105.6% to £14.8 million from £7.2 million during the same period, and segment profit expressed in euros increased by 104.3% to
€23.5 million from €11.5 million during the same period. The increase was primarily owing to higher revenues as described above.

ntl: shared services.For the year ended December 31, 2002, ntl: shared services loss decreased by 13.7% to
$354.1 million from $410.1 million for 2001, and loss expressed in UK pounds decreased 17.3% to £235.7 million from £284.9 million during the same
period. This was primarily due to lower employee-related costs and other operational efficiencies and cost savings.

Statement of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002

For the year ended December 31, 2003, cash provided by operating activities increased to $521.1 million from $258.7 million in 2002, because
of the improvement in operating results. For the year ended December 31, 2003, cash paid for interest, exclusive of amounts capitalized, increased to $583.4 million from
$410.0 million in 2002 primarily as a result of our resumption of payment of interest due on our outstanding debt when we emerged from bankruptcy on January 10, 2003. These payments were
suspended during our reorganization process. In addition, the amendment and restatement of our Senior and Working Capital Credit Facilities in January 2003 increased the rate of interest and
unfavorable movements in exchange rates increased the US dollar equivalent of our UK pound debt interest payments.

For
the year ended December 31, 2003, cash used in investing activities decreased to $563.6 million from $844.2 million in 2002. Cash used in investing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2002, included $166.5 million of restricted cash drawn under the DIP facility. See "Our Restructuring". The DIP facility was repaid on the effective date
of our reorganization from Chapter 11. Purchases of fixed assets for the year ended December 31, 2003, which are primarily related to customer premise equipment, were lower than in 2002.
During 2003, we continued to restrict purchases of fixed assets in an effort to conserve cash.

Cash
provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $120.9 million compared with $800.6 million cash provided for the year ended
December 31, 2002.

The
principal components of the $120.9 million cash provided by financing activities in 2003 were as follows:



The
principal components of the $800.6 million cash provided in 2002 were as follows:



73

---



Year Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

Cash provided by (used in) operating activities was $258.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared with $(558.6) million for the year
ended December 31, 2001. Cash paid for interest, exclusive of amounts capitalized, was $410.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, and $776.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2001. The change in cash provided by (used in) operating activities is due to changes in working capital as a result of the timing of receipts and disbursements including the
suspension of various payments due to our reorganization.

Cash
used in investing activities was $844.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, and $1,858.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Cash
used in investing activities primarily includes cash used for purchases of fixed assets and acquisitions, net of cash acquired.

Purchases
of fixed assets were $680.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, and $1,653.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 as a result of
continuing fixed asset purchases and network construction. We continue to restrict purchases of fixed assets in 2002 in an effort to conserve cash.

Cash
used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2001 also included cash used for a loan to our former parent company of $150.0 million. On
September 28, 2001, we loaned our former parent company $150.0 million in exchange for 15.0% promissory notes due September 30, 2004. Interest was payable monthly in cash at a
rate of 15.0% per annum beginning on October 31, 2001. These notes were cancelled pursuant to the Plan.

Cash
provided by financing activities was $800.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, and $2,252.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Proceeds
from borrowings from NTL Delaware of $135.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 is the £90.0 million loan to NTL (UK)
Group, Inc. This note was purchased by one of our subsidiaries for consideration equal to the principal amount of the note plus accrued interest on the effective date of the Plan. Proceeds from
borrowings, net of financing costs, of $670.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes $463.2 million borrowed under the NTL Communications Limited working capital
facility, net of costs of $9.5 million, and $229.0 million borrowed under the Communications Cable Funding Corp. debtor-in-possession facility, net of costs of
$12.6 million.

Proceeds
from borrowings, net of financing costs, of $2,643.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 include $838.5 million borrowed under our senior credit
facility, $431.8 million borrowed under our working capital facility, $1,150.0 million from the issuance of our 63/4% Convertible Senior Notes and $277.9 million
from the issuance of our 123/8% Senior Euro Notes, net of aggregate financing costs of $54.8 million. These notes were cancelled pursuant to the Plan.

Principal
payments of $421.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 include optional repayments of $395.8 million under the NTL Communications Limited credit
agreements and repayments of an aggregate of $25.7 million of other debt.

Cash
provided by financing activities also includes contributions from our former parent company NTL Delaware of $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 and
$40.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our business is capital intensive, we are highly leveraged, and we have historically incurred operating losses and negative cash flow. We require significant
amounts of capital to connect customers to our network, expand and upgrade our network, offer new services and integrate our billing systems and customer databases. We must regularly service interest
payments with cash flows from operations and we have over $5.4 billion of principal payments and contractual commitments coming due over the

74

---

next
three years. Our ability to sustain operations, meet financial covenants under our indebtedness, obtain additional capital and make required payments on our indebtedness could be impaired if we
are unable to maintain or achieve various financial performance measures.

On
November 4, 2003, we declared a non-cash dividend to stockholders of record of our common stock as of the close of business on November 7, 2003, at no
charge, of 0.702243 transferable rights for each share of our common stock they hold on the record date. Each right entitled stockholders to purchase one share at a purchase price of $40.00. The
rights offering period expired on November 17, 2003.

In
connection with the rights offering, we issued 35,853,465 shares and received gross proceeds of $1,434 million. We used the net proceeds of approximately $1,367 million
to repay in full all obligations under our Exit Notes and, together with cash on hand, our working capital facility. In addition, we used the net proceeds as inter-company funding to one of our
subsidiaries and the balance for general corporate expenses.

Historically,
we have been unable to obtain positive cash flow, partly as a result of our construction costs, operating expenditures and interest costs. We have also incurred and expect
to continue to incur substantial losses. During the period after we emerged from our Chapter 11 reorganization until the completion of the rights offering, we funded ourselves primarily with the
proceeds of borrowings from the Exit Notes, our working capital facility and our senior credit facility. For the period of January 1, 2004 through March 31, 2005, we expect to spend
between £420 million and £460 million, or between $750 million and $820 million, on acquiring fixed assets. We believe that our cash on hand,
together with cash from operations, will be sufficient for our cash requirements through March 2005. However, our cash requirements after March 31, 2005, may exceed, perhaps significantly,
these sources of cash. This may require that we obtain financing in excess of the proposed refinancing we are currently negotiating. See "Recent Developments". We may not be able to obtain financing
at all, or on favorable terms, or we may be contractually prevented by the terms of our current or proposed indebtedness from incurring additional indebtedness.

Beginning
in 2005, a series of principal payments and other contractual commitments come due, including on September 30, 2005 the principal under the revolving facility of our
senior credit facility. As of December 31, 2003, the principal amount outstanding under this facility was £2,584.8 million, or $4,611.8 million. We currently do not have adequate
cash flow to fund these requirements. Consequently, we anticipate funding these requirements through refinancing in the debt markets. We are currently seeking to take advantage of favorable market
conditions in
connection with our refinancing needs. See "BusinessRecent Developments." If our proposed refinancing fails, we may seek to amend the terms of our existing credit facilities, including
extending their maturities. Additionally, we may seek liquidity in the equity markets. If we were to issue additional equity, there could be a dilutive effect on our shareholders. There can be no
assurance that any of these sources of funds will be available to us or that any covenants in any new debt will not be more restrictive than the covenants under our existing debt.

To
the extent we raise additional capital, market considerations may require us to seek financing denominated in US dollars, further exposing us to currency exchange risks. To the
extent that the UK pound declines in value against the US dollar, it will become more difficult for us to service this US dollar debt.

The
agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness significantly restrict and, in some cases, prohibit our ability and the ability of most of our subsidiaries to:



75

---



In
addition, our subsidiaries and we are obligated to comply with various financial covenants that require our subsidiaries and us to meet and maintain specified financial performance
measures and ratios. These covenants set targets related to liquidity, coverage and leverage ratios. These ratios are not publicly reported and depend on measures like derivatives of earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA. The definition of EBITDA included in our senior credit and working capital facilities includes various adjustments to that measure for the
purposes of these agreements. EBITDA as so defined is not a measure that is reported in our financial statements. With respect to our senior credit and working capital facilities, these ratios are
tested quarterly. Over time, these ratios change to become more restrictive. Although as a result of the rights offering, debt levels and total charges have decreased, our compliance is still heavily
dependent on our ability to maintain the EBITDA and other performance measures defined in these agreements. In particular, our ability to maintain ratios that are based on earnings or cash flows will
depend on our business performance, which may be influenced by factors outside our control. In the event that we fail to meet any of these covenants and we are unable to cure the failure or otherwise
renegotiate the covenant, the lenders under those agreements would have significant rights to seize control of most of our assets because these agreements are secured by liens on most of our assets or
to accelerate payment under our debt facilities. Also, a default under one debt agreement could trigger a default under our other debt agreements.

Our
debt and the debt of some of our subsidiaries contain restrictions on our ability to transfer cash between groups of our subsidiaries. This debt includes the senior credit facility,
the 11.20% Senior Discount Debentures of NTL Triangle, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, referred to as the Triangle Notes, and the 91/8% Senior Notes and the 10% Senior
Sterling Notes of Diamond Holdings, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, referred to as the Diamond Notes. The Triangle Notes and Diamond Notes are described more fully below. As a result of
these restrictions, although our overall
liquidity may be sufficient to satisfy our obligations, we may be limited by covenants in some of our indebtedness from transferring cash to other subsidiaries that might require funds. In addition,
cross-default provisions in our other indebtedness may be triggered if we default on any of these debt agreements.

We
are a holding company with no independent operations or significant assets other than our investments in and advances to our subsidiaries. As a result, we depend upon the receipt of
sufficient funds from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations. In addition, the terms of our subsidiaries' and our existing and future indebtedness and the laws of the jurisdictions under which those
subsidiaries are organized limit the payment of dividends, loan repayments and other distributions to us under many circumstances.

At
December 31, 2003, all of our defined benefit pension plans have projected benefit obligations exceeding plan assets totaling $156.9 million. We will need to fund these
deficits in accordance with the laws and regulations of the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. We expect to contribute a total of approximately £14.9 million
($26.6 million) in 2004, of which £13.0 million ($23.2 million) relates to the largest of our defined benefit pension plans.

76

---



During the year ended December 31, 2003, we received an actuarial valuation as of December 31, 2002, of the largest of our defined benefit pension plans, which represented
approximately 82.9% of total plan assets and 83.3% of total projected benefit obligations at December 31, 2003. Based upon this actuarial valuation of the assets as of the valuation date of
December 31, 2002, this plan has a projected benefit obligation exceeding the fair value of plan assets by approximately £82.3 million, or $146.8 million. We will need
to fund this deficit in accordance with the laws and regulations of the United Kingdom. We will need to contribute approximately £13.0 million ($23.2 million) in cash
payments annually beginning January 1, 2004, and must increase this contribution by 4% for each succeeding year for a period of eleven and one half years in order to eliminate the current
deficit. The actuarial valuation of our pension plans requires the use of assumptions and estimates. These assumptions may differ from those used in calculating the amounts required to be disclosed in
accordance with SFAS No. 132. Changes in these assumptions and estimates as well as future investment returns could potentially have a material impact, either upwards or downwards, on
the estimated funding requirement.

Description of Outstanding Indebtedness

The terms of the significant notes and credit facilities issued by our subsidiaries and us are summarized below.

Senior Credit Facility



We
will repay the senior credit facility if we consummate the proposed refinancing. See "Recent Developments."

Other Indebtedness



77

---



We
will redeem all of this other indebtedness if we consummate the proposed refinancing. See "Recent Developments."

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table includes aggregate information about our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2003, and the periods in which payments are due (in
millions).

|                                      |  |   |         | Payments Due by Period
|------------------------------------- |  | - | ------- | ----------------------
|
|Long-Term Debt                        |  | $ | 5,839.9 |                       
|Capital Lease Obligations             |  |   | 71.4    |                       
|Operating Leases                      |  |   | 816.2   |                       
|Unconditional Purchase Obligations(1) |  |   | 479.2   |                       
|Other Long-Term Obligations           |  |   | 32.2    |                       
|                                      |  |   |         |                       
|Total Contractual Cash Obligations    |  | $ | 7,238.9 |                       
|                                      |  |   |         |                       

---

The
following table includes information about our commercial commitments as of December 31, 2003. Commercial commitments are items that we could be obligated to pay in the
future. They are not required to be included in the consolidated balance sheet (in millions).

|                               |  |   |      | Amount of Commitment Expiration
per Period
|------------------------------ |  | - | ---- | ------------------------------------------
|
|Guarantees                     |  | $ | 32.2 |                                           
|Lines of Credit                |  |   |     |                                           
|Standby Letters of Credit      |  |   |     |                                           
|Standby Repurchase Obligations |  |   |     |                                           
|Other Commercial Commitments   |  |   |     |                                           
|                               |  |   |      |                                           
|Total Commercial Commitments   |  | $ | 32.2 |                                           
|                               |  |   |      |                                           

Guarantees
relate to performance bonds provided by banks on our behalf as part of our contractual obligations. The fair value of the guarantees has been calculated by reference to the
monetary value of each bond.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The presentation of this supplemental information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for other measures of financial performance
reported in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect an additional way of viewing aspects of our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results and the following
reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures, allow a better understanding of factors and trends affecting our business.

Combined
segment profit is not a financial measure recognized under GAAP. Combined segment profit represents our combined earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
long-lived asset impairments, non-cash compensation, other charges, share of (losses) from equity investments,

78

---

other
gains (losses), foreign currency transaction gains (losses) and recapitalization expense, for each of our reportable business segments. This measure is most directly comparable to the GAAP
financial measure net income (loss). Some of the significant limitations associated with the use of combined segment profit as compared with net income (loss) are that combined segment profit does not
consider the amount of required reinvestment in depreciable fixed assets, interest expense, gains or losses on foreign currency transactions, income tax expense or benefit and similar items on our
results of operations. Combined segment profit also ignores the impact on our results of operations of items that management believes are not characteristic of our underlying business operations. We
compensate for these limitations by using combined segment profit to measure profit or loss on a combined segmental basis and not to determine our consolidated results of operations.

We
believe combined segment profit is helpful for understanding our performance and assessing our prospects for the future, and that it provides useful supplemental information to
investors. In particular, this non-GAAP financial measure reflects an additional way of viewing aspects of our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results and the reconciliations to
net income (loss), provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business. Because non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized, it may not be possible to
compare combined segment profit (loss) with other companies' non-GAAP financial measures that have the same or similar names. The presentation of this supplemental information is not meant
to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income (loss) or other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP.

Reconciliation of Combined Segment Profit to US GAAP net loss

|                        |                                             | Years ended December 31, |         
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------
|
|
|Combined segment profit |                                             | $                        | 1,199.1 
|Reconciling items:      |                                             |                          |         
|                        | Long-lived asset impairments                |                          |         
|                        | Non-cash compensation                       |                          |         
|                        | Other charges                               |                          |         
|                        | Depreciation and amortization               |                          |         
|                        | Interest income and other, net              |                          |         
|                        | Interest expense                            |                          |         
|                        | Share of (losses) from equity investments   |                          |         
|                        | Other gains (losses)                        |                          |         
|                        | Foreign currency transaction gains (losses) |                          |         
|                        | Recapitalization expense                    |                          |         
|                        | Income tax (expense) benefit                |                          |         
|                        |                                             |                          |         
|Subtotal                |                                             |                          | (2,153.3
|                        |                                             |                          |         
|Net (loss)              |                                             | $                        | (954.2  
|                        |                                             |                          |         

Our Restructuring

Both the equity and debt capital markets experienced periods of significant volatility in 2001 and 2002, particularly for securities issued by telecommunications
and technology companies. As a result, the ability of our former parent company and its subsidiaries to access those markets as well as its ability to obtain financing from its bank lenders and
equipment suppliers became severely restricted. In addition, our former parent company and its subsidiaries, including us, had no further funds available, or were unable to draw upon funds under our
credit facilities. As a result of these factors, together

79

---

with
its substantial leverage, on January 31, 2002, our former parent company announced that it had appointed professional advisors to advise on strategic and recapitalization alternatives to
strengthen its balance sheet, reduce debt and put an appropriate capital structure in place for its business.

Promptly
upon obtaining the requisite waivers from the lenders under its credit facilities, in March 2002, our former parent company commenced negotiations with a steering
committee of the unofficial committee of its bondholders and the committee's legal and financial advisors.

Our
former parent company and its subsidiaries failed to make interest payments on some of the outstanding notes starting on April 1, 2002. Our former parent company also failed
to declare or pay dividends on certain series of its outstanding preferred stock, due to a lack of available surplus under Delaware law.

On
April 16, 2002, our former parent company announced that it and the unofficial committee of its bondholders had reached an agreement in principle on a comprehensive
recapitalization of the former NTL group. To implement the proposed recapitalization plan, on May 8, 2002, we, our former parent company and certain of our former parent company's other
subsidiaries filed cases and a pre-arranged joint reorganization plan under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. In connection with the filing, some members of the unofficial
creditors' committee of bondholders entered into a credit facility agreement, referred to in this Form 10-K as the DIP facility, committing to provide a wholly-owned subsidiary of
ours with up to $500 million in new debt financing. NTL Delaware committed to provide up to an additional $130 million to us under the DIP facility.

As
a result of the payment defaults as well as the voluntary filing under Chapter 11 by our former parent company and certain of its subsidiaries on May 8, 2002, there was an
event of default under all of our former parent company's and its subsidiaries' principal credit facilities and the indentures governing all of their publicly traded debt, other than debt of NTL
Triangle.

The
Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Plan on September 5, 2002. During the fall of 2002, our former parent company negotiated with a group of lenders to enter into a new financing
arrangement to repay the DIP facility, to repay various obligations and to provide liquidity to our subsidiaries and us. The Plan became effective on January 10, 2003, at which time we emerged
from Chapter 11 reorganization. In connection with our emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, we issued $558.2 million aggregate principal face amount of the Exit Notes on January 10,
2003. Initial purchasers of the Exit Notes also purchased 500,000 shares of our common stock on that date. The gross proceeds from the sale of the Exit Notes and these 500,000 shares totaled
$500 million. The proceeds were used in part to repay all amounts outstanding under the DIP facility, to purchase from NTL Delaware a £90.0 million note of NTL (UK)
Group, Inc., one of our subsidiaries, and to repay certain other obligations. Also on January 10, 2003, our lending banks and we amended our existing credit facilities.

Fresh-Start Reporting

We operated our business as a debtor-in-possession subject to the jurisdiction of the US Bankruptcy Court during the period from
May 8, 2002 until January 10, 2003.
Accordingly, our consolidated financial statements for periods prior to our emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization were prepared in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants Statement of Position 90-7, "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code," or SOP 90-7. In addition, we adopted fresh-start
reporting upon our emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization in accordance with SOP 90-7. For financial reporting purposes, the effects of the completion of the Plan as well as adjustments
for fresh-start reporting have been recorded in our consolidated financial statements as of January 1, 2003.

Pursuant
to fresh-start reporting, a new entity was deemed created for financial reporting purposes. The carrying values of our assets were adjusted to their reorganization values, which
are

80

---

equivalent
to their estimated fair values at January 1, 2003. The carrying values of our liabilities were adjusted to their present values at January 1, 2003.

The
emergence from Chapter 11 and the adoption of fresh-start reporting as of January 1, 2003 resulted in the following items of income (expense) that were recognized on that date
(in millions):

|                                                        |  | January 1,
2003 |         
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | --------
|
|Gain on debt discharge                                  |  | $               | 8,451.6 
|Fresh-start adoptionintangible assets                  |  |                 | 1,521.7 
|Fresh-start adoptionlong-term debt                     |  |                 | 221.3   
|Fresh-start adoptiondeferred tax liability             |  |                 | (68.6   
|Fresh-start adoptionaccrued expenses                   |  |                 | (120.4  
|Fresh-start adoptionfixed assets                       |  |                 | (3,194.9
|Recapitalization expense                                |  |                 | (8.0    
|                                                        |  |                 |         
|Net income                                              |  | $               | 6,802.7 
|                                                        |  |                 |         
|Pro forma basic and diluted net income per common share |  | $               | 114.33  
|Pro forma weighted average number of shares             |  |                 | 59.5    

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 132 (Revised),Employers' Disclosures
About Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, an Amendment of FASB Statements 87, 88 and 106.This statement revises employers' disclosures about pension plans and other
postretirement plans, it does not change the measurement or recognition of these plans required by FASB Statement No. 87,Employers' Accounting for
Pensions, No. 88,Employers' Accounting for Settlement and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination
Benefits, and No. 106,Employers' Accounting for Postretirment Benefits Other Than Pensions. This statement replaces FASB
No. 132,Employers' Disclosures About Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, and requires additional disclosures to those in the original
Statement No. 132. This statement was developed in response to concerns expressed by users of financial statements about their needs for more information about pension plan assets, obligations,
benefit payments, contributions and net benefit costs. The statement is effective for financial statements with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003, and for foreign plans with fiscal
years ending after June 15, 2004. The early adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on our consolidated statement of operations. We adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 132 (Revised) as of December 31, 2003.

81

---

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Market risk is the potential loss arising from
adverse changes in market rates and prices, like foreign currency exchange and interest rates. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

We
encounter currency exchange rate risks because substantially all of our revenues and operating costs are earned and paid primarily in pounds and, to a lesser extent, euros, but we pay
interest and
principal obligations with respect to a portion of our existing indebtedness in US dollars. To the extent that the pound declines in value against the US dollar, the effective cost of
servicing our US dollar debt will be higher. Changes in the exchange rate result in foreign currency gains or losses. As of December 31, 2003, $485.3 million (net of unamortized
discount of $141.9 million), or 8.5% of our long-term debt, net of unamortized discount, was in US dollars.

Because
the revenues and expenses from our principal operations are denominated primarily in pounds, but we report our financial results in US dollars, our financial results are
also impacted by currency fluctuations, which are unrelated to our underlying results of operations. The aggregate potential increase in our net loss from a hypothetical one percent fall in the US
dollar to UK pound exchange rate would have been approximately $8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.

The
fair market value of long-term fixed interest rate debt and the amount of future interest payments on variable interest rate debt are subject to interest rate risk.

The
following table provides information as of December 31, 2003, about our long-term fixed and variable interest rate debt by maturity that are sensitive to changes
in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates (in millions).

|                                         |                               | Year Ending December 31, |   |  |                 |  |                 | 
|---------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------------------ | - |  | --------------- |  | --------------- | 
|
|
|Long-term debt including current portion |                               |                          |   |  |                 |  |                 | 
|US Dollars                               |                               |                          |   |  |                 |  |                 | 
|                                         | Fixed rate                    |                          |  |  |                |  |                | 
|                                         | Average interest rate         |                          |   |  |                 |  |                 | 
|UK Pound                                 |                               |                          |   |  |                 |  |                 | 
|                                         | Fixed rate                    |                          |  |  |                |  |                | 
|                                         | Average interest rate         |                          |   |  |                 |  |                 | 
|                                         | Average forward exchange rate |                          |   |  |                 |  |                 | 
|UK Pound                                 |                               |                          |   |  |                 |  |                 | 
|                                         | Variable Rate                 |                          |  |  | £2,584.8        |  |                | 
|                                         | Average interest rate         |                          |   |  | LIBOR plus 4.0% |  |                 | 
|                                         | Average forward exchange rate |                          |   |  | 1.6963          |  |                 | 
|UK Pound                                 |                               |                          |   |  |                 |  |                 | 
|                                         | Variable Rate                 |                          |  |  |                |  | £20.0           | 
|                                         | Average interest rate         |                          |   |  |                 |  | LIBOR plus 5.5% | 
|                                         | Average forward exchange rate |                          |   |  |                 |  | 1.6798          | 

82

---



Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Our consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto and the report of the independent auditors are on pages F-1 to F-77 of this
annual report and are incorporated by reference. The following is a summary of selected quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002:

|                                                    |                 | 2003 |       
|--------------------------------------------------- | --------------- | ---- | ------
|
|
|
|Revenues:                                           |                 |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: home       |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: business   |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: broadcast  |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: Ireland    |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: carriers   |      |       
|                                                    |                 |      |       
|Total revenues                                      |                 | $    | 875.9 
|                                                    |                 |      |       
|Segment profit (loss):                              |                 |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: home       |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: business   |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: broadcast  |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: Ireland    |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: carriers   |      |       
|                                                    | Shared services |      |       
|                                                    |                 |      |       
|Combined segment profit                             |                 | $    | 250.4 
|                                                    |                 |      |       
|Segment profit as a percentage of revenues:         |                 |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: home       |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: business   |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: broadcast  |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: Ireland    |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: carriers   |      |       
|Combined segment profit as a percentage of revenues |                 |      | 28.6  
|Operating (loss)                                    |                 |      | (86.6 
|Net (loss), as previously reported                  |                 |      | (279.6
|Net (loss) per share, as previously reported        |                 |      | (5.54 
|Net (loss), revised(1)                              |                 |      | (279.9
|Net (loss) per share, revised(1)                    |                 | $    | (4.70 

83

---

|                                                    |                 | 2002 |       
|--------------------------------------------------- | --------------- | ---- | ------
|
|
|
|Revenues:                                           |                 |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: home       |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: business   |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: broadcast  |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: Ireland    |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: carriers   |      |       
|                                                    |                 |      |       
|Total revenues                                      |                 | $    | 792.9 
|                                                    |                 |      |       
|Segment profit (loss):                              |                 |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: home       |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: business   |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: broadcast  |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: Ireland    |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: carriers   |      |       
|                                                    | Shared services |      |       
|                                                    |                 |      |       
|Combined segment profit                             |                 | $    | 220.0 
|                                                    |                 |      |       
|Segment profit as a percentage of revenues:         |                 |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: home       |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: business   |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: broadcast  |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: Ireland    |      |       
|                                                    | ntl: carriers   |      |       
|Combined segment profit as a percentage of revenues |                 |      | 27.7  
|Operating (loss)                                    |                 |      | (119.0
|Net (loss)                                          |                 |      | (459.9
|Net (loss) per share                                |                 | $    | (7.73 

---

84

---



85

---



Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

None

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as this term is defined in Rule 13a-14(c) and Rule 15d-14(c)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, our disclosure controls and procedures are adequately designed to ensure that the information required
to be included in this report has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely basis.

Changes in Internal Controls.Since the end of the period covered by this annual report, there have been no changes in our
internal controls that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting covered by this report.

86

---



PART III

Item 10.    Directors and Executive Officers & Registrants

The following table provides information about our directors and executive officers:

|Name                   |  | Age |  | Title                                               
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|James F. Mooney        |  | 49  |  | Chairman                                            
|Simon P. Duffy         |  | 54  |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director     
|Scott E. Schubert      |  | 50  |  | Chief Financial Officer                             
|Robert C. Gale         |  | 43  |  | Vice PresidentController                           
|Howard S. Kalika       |  | 46  |  | Vice PresidentChief Financial OfficerNTL (UK)     
|Richard H. Martin, Jr. |  | 43  |  | Vice PresidentFinancial Services and Administration
|Edwin M. Banks         |  | 41  |  | Director                                            
|Jeffrey D. Benjamin    |  | 42  |  | Director                                            
|David Elstein          |  | 59  |  | Director                                            
|Charles K. Gallagher   |  | 38  |  | Director                                            
|William R. Huff        |  | 54  |  | Director                                            
|Brett G. Wyard         |  | 34  |  | Director                                            
|George R. Zoffinger    |  | 56  |  | Director                                            

The
following is a brief description of the present and past business experience of each of our directors and executive officers.

James F. Mooney

Mr. Mooney became our chairman in March 2003. From April 2001 to September 2002, Mr. Mooney was the executive vice president
and chief operating officer of Nextel Communications Inc. Prior to joining Nextel, from January 2000 to January 2001, Mr. Mooney was the chief executive officer and chief
operating officer of Tradeout Inc., an asset management firm jointly owned by GE Capital Corp., Ebay Inc. and Benchmark Capital. Before his position with Tradeout, from April 1999
to January 2000, Mr. Mooney was the chief financial officer at Baan Company, a business management software provider that had dual headquarters in Amsterdam and Virginia. From 1980 to
March 1999, Mr. Mooney held a number of positions with IBM Corporation, including his last position as chief financial officer of the Americas. Mr. Mooney is a director of Sirius
Satellite Radio.

Simon P. Duffy

Mr. Duffy is our chief executive officer and a director and has held these positions since August 15, 2003. He joined us on April 1, 2003 as
our chief operating officer. From May 2002 to March 2003, Mr. Duffy was chief financial officer of Orange SA. Prior to joining Orange SA, from April 2001 to
January 2002, Mr. Duffy was chief executive officer of End2End, a Denmark-based wireless data company. He joined End2End from Internet service provider World Online International NV.
From December 1999 to January 2001, Mr. Duffy served as chief executive officer and deputy chairman of World Online and led the initial public offering of the company and
subsequent sale to Tiscali SPA. Prior to his tenure at World Online, Mr. Duffy spent eight years at EMI Group plc, first as group finance director of THORN EMI and later, following EMI Group's
demerger, as deputy chairman and group finance director of EMI Group. Prior to joining THORN EMI, Mr. Duffy worked at Guinness plc, first as director of corporate finance and subsequently as
operations director of United Distillers, Guinness's spirits division. Mr. Duffy is also a director of Imperial Tobacco Group plc and GWR Group plc.

87

---

Scott E. Schubert

Mr. Schubert is our chief financial officer. He joined us in March 2003. From June 1999 to March 2003, Mr. Schubert held a
number of positions with WilTel Communications, including his last position as chief financial and corporate services officer. Prior to joining WilTel, from 1976 to June 1999,
Mr. Schubert held various positions at Amoco Corporation, including international controller of exploration and production and vice president of Worldwide Financial Services. Following the
merger of BP and Amoco in 1998, he was appointed vice president and head of BP Amoco's Global Financial Services.

In
April 2002, Williams Communications Group Inc. filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code and emerged in October 2002 as WilTel
Communications Group.

Robert C. Gale

Mr. Gale is our vice presidentcontroller. He has held this position since June 17, 2003. Mr. Gale joined us in May 2000
from Cable & Wireless Communications plc, where he was head of finance for the ConsumerCo business acquired by us. In October 2000, he was appointed as group
director of financial control for our UK operations. He had joined Cable & Wireless in January 1998. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Gale was chief financial officer of ComTel, a cable
operator subsequently acquired by us. Between 1989 and 1995, Mr. Gale was group financial controller at TVS Entertainment PLC, a UK television broadcaster and program producer. Mr. Gale
is a chartered accountant and worked for KPMG at its London office between 1981 and 1989.

Howard S. Kalika

Mr. Kalika is our vice presidentchief financial officerNTL (UK). He joined us in March 2003. Prior to that time, from
September 1999 to December 2002, Mr. Kalika was a senior vice president of WilTel Communications, where he led corporate finance activities. From June 1982 to
September 1999, Mr. Kalika held various senior finance positions with Amoco Corporation and BP Amoco.

Mr. Kalika
was an officer of WilTel during its Chapter 11 reorganization.

Richard H. Martin, Jr.

Mr. Martin is our vice presidentfinancial services and administration. He joined us in March 2003. From April 2000 to
December 2002, Mr. Martin held various positions with WilTel Communications Group, including vice presidenttreasurer, vice presidentfinance, emerging markets
and assistant treasurer. Before joining WilTel, Mr. Martin was regional chief financial officerAfrica of BP plc from June 1999 through April 2000. Prior to working at
BP, from August 1983 to May 1999, Mr. Martin held various positions with Amoco Corporation, including director, business solutions.

Mr. Martin
was an officer of WilTel during its Chapter 11 reorganization.

Edwin M. Banks

Mr. Banks has been a director since May 7, 2003. Since June 1988, Mr. Banks has served as portfolio manager for W.R. Huff Asset
Management, an investment management firm. W.R. Huff Asset Management is one of our principal stockholders. Mr. Banks is currently a director of Caremark Rx, Inc.

Jeffrey D. Benjamin

Mr. Benjamin became a director on January 10, 2003. He is currently a senior advisor to Apollo Management, LP, a private investment fund, and has
held that position since September 2002. From

88

---

June 1998
to September 2002, Mr. Benjamin was employed by Libra Securities LLC, an investment banking firm, and its predecessors in various positions, including
co-chief executive officer. Mr. Benjamin currently serves on the boards of directors of Mandalay Resort Group, Chiquita Brands International, Inc., McLeod USA Incorporated
and Dade Behring Holdings Inc.

David Elstein

Mr. Elstein became a director on January 10, 2003. Since January 1982, he has owned Brook Productions Ltd., a television consulting
and production company. He is currently the chairman of the following organizations: the British Screen Advisory Council, Screen Digest Ltd. and Really Useful Theatres Ltd. He is also
currently a director of Sports and Leisure Group plc and a non-executive director and vice-chairman of Kingsbridge Capital Ltd. He has been a visiting professor of
broadcasting at Oxford, Westminster, and Stirling Universities. From 1996 to 2000, Mr. Elstein was chief executive officer of Channel 5 Broadcasting Ltd. in Britain, from 1992 to 1996 he
was head of programming at BSkyB and from 1986 to 1992 he was a director of programs at Thames Television.

Charles K. Gallagher

Mr. Gallagher has been a director since August 2003. Since September 2001, he has served as chief financial officer of Viewpointe Archive
Services, a joint venture among Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase & Co., US Bancorp, SunTrust Banks, Inc. and IBM that engages in the imaging and archiving of digital copies of
checks. From February 2000 to June 2001, Mr. Gallagher served as chief financial officer of Tradeout Inc. Before joining Tradeout Inc., from August 1999 to
January 2000, Mr. Gallagher served as vice president and controller of Baan Company. From 1985 to 1999, Mr. Gallagher held a number of positions with IBM Corporation, including
his last position as chief financial officer of its small and medium business segment of North America.

William R. Huff

Mr. Huff became a director on January 10, 2003. He served as our interim chairman of the board of directors until March 2003, when
Mr. Mooney became chairman. Mr. Huff is principal and president of W.R. Huff Asset Management. Mr. Huff founded W.R. Huff Asset Management in 1984.

Brett G. Wyard

Mr. Wyard became a director on May 7, 2003. Mr. Wyard is currently a managing director of Oaktree Capital Management, LLC, the general
partner or investment manager of the investment funds and third party accounts that directly own shares of our common stock. Before joining Oaktree Capital in 1999, Mr. Wyard served as a vice
president in Merrill Lynch's global distressed situations group where he focused on proprietary debt investments in distressed and bankrupt situations. Prior to joining Merrill Lynch in 1997,
Mr. Wyard spent three years as an associate in Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin, Inc.'s financial restructuring group, providing financial advisory services to both distressed
corporations and their creditor constituencies. Prior to that time, Mr. Wyard worked at Voyageur Asset Management in investment-grade bond management and at Miller & Schroeder Financial
in investment banking.

George R. Zoffinger

Mr. Zoffinger became a director on January 10, 2003. He is the president and chief executive officer of the New Jersey Sports and Exposition
Authority, a position he has held since March 2002. From March 1998 to March 2002, he served as president and chief executive officer of Constellation Capital Corporation. From
October 1995 to February 1998, he served as president and chief executive officer of Value Property Trust, a publicly owned real estate investment trust. Mr. Zoffinger served as

89

---

chairman
of CoreStates New Jersey National Bank from 1994 to December 1996 and as president and chief executive officer of Constellation Bancorp from 1991 to 1994. Further, Mr. Zoffinger
was the commissioner of commerce and economic development for the State of New Jersey in 1990. Mr. Zoffinger is currently a director of New Jersey Resources Inc., and Commercial Federal
Bancorp.

Staggered Board

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for a classified board of directors consisting of three classes as nearly equal in number as
possible. Directors in each class serve staggered three-year terms. Our Class I Directors are Edwin M. Banks, Simon P. Duffy and Charles K. Gallagher and their terms terminate on
the date of our 2006 annual meeting of stockholders. Our Class II Directors are Jeffrey D. Benjamin, David Elstein and Brett G. Wyard and their terms terminate on the date of our 2004 annual
meeting of stockholders. Our Class III Directors are James F. Mooney, William R. Huff and George R. Zoffinger and their terms terminate on the date of our 2005 annual meeting of stockholders.
At each annual meeting of stockholders, successors to the class of directors whose term expires at that annual meeting are elected for a three-year term.

Compensation of Directors

We reimburse our directors for out-of-pocket expenses related to attending meetings of our board of directors and committees. Our
non-employee board members are paid quarterly based on an annual fee of £50,000, or $82,500, which is paid in US dollars to our directors who are based in the United
States. Our directors who are our employees do not receive additional compensation for their service as a member of our board of directors.

In
addition, we granted each of our non-employee board members options to purchase 75,000 shares of our common stock at the time of their election to our board. Except in the
case of Charles K. Gallagher, these options have an exercise price of $15 per share. Mr. Gallagher's options have an exercise price of $40.00 per share. These director options vest in equal
installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

Board of Directors Committees

The board of directors has an audit committee, a compensation committee, an executive committee and a finance committee.

Audit Committee

The audit committee of the board of directors reviews, acts on and reports to our board of directors with respect to various auditing and accounting matters. The
current members of the audit committee are Edwin M Banks, who is its chairman, David Elstein, Charles K. Gallagher (who the board has determined to be an audit committee financial expert) and
George R. Zoffinger. The members of the audit committee are independent within the meaning of the Nasdaq National Markets listing standards currently applicable to us.

Compensation Committee

The compensation committee reviews and makes recommendations regarding annual compensation for officers. The compensation committee consists of Jeffrey D.
Benjamin, who is its chairman, David Elstein and Brett G. Wyard. The compensation committee also serves as the compensation and option committee under the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan.

90

---

Executive Committee

The executive committee is responsible for recommending individuals to serve on the board of directors and as our senior executive officers, advising the board
with respect to the board's committees and other structural issues, overseeing our management and recommending other changes in our management, operations, strategy and business. The executive
committee consists of William R. Huff, who is its chairman, Edwin M. Banks, George R. Zoffinger, Brett G. Wyard and James F. Mooney.

Finance Committee

The finance committee is responsible for overseeing our financing activities. The finance committee consists of Brett G. Wyard, who is its chairman, Edwin M.
Banks, Jeffrey D. Benjamin and George R. Zoffinger.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity
securities to file with the SEC, and with each exchange on which our common stock trades, initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity
securities. Officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by the SEC's regulations to furnish us with a copy of all Section 16(a) forms and reports they file.

To
our knowledge, based solely on a review of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003, our officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them except matters exempted from
disclosure under this item by reason of the transition relief granted by the SEC and except in the following instances:



All
reports referred to above have since been filed.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics for our principal executive officers, principal financial officers, principal accounting officers or controllers, or persons
performing similar functions, which has been filed as Exhibit 14.1 to this annual report on Form 10-K.

91

---



Item 11.    Executive Compensation

The following table discloses compensation received by our chief executive officer, our former chief executive officer, our four other most highly paid executive
officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2003 and one other former executive officer who would have been among these executive officers had he been serving at the end
of the fiscal year. We refer to these executives collectively as named executive officers.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE(1)

|                                                                                     |  |                |  |                         |  |                         |  |             |  | Long Term Compensation |  |                    |       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------ | ------
|
|
|
|
|Simon P. Duffy
president and chief executive officer                                 |  | 2003
2002
2001 |  | 474,469

             |  | 711,704

             |  | 

       |  | 

                  |  | 260,000

        | (4)   
|Barclay Knapp(6)
former president and chief executive officer                        |  | 2003
2002
2001 |  | 428,035
369,763
277,260 |  | 653,014
408,100
561,138 |  | 

       |  | 590,223

            |  | 400,000
5,000,000 | (4)(8)
|James F. Mooney
chairman                                                             |  | 2003
2002
2001 |  | 1,125,000

           |  | 370,000

             |  | 

       |  | 1,412,000

          |  | 400,000

        |       
|Scott E. Schubert(10)
chief financial officer                                        |  | 2003
2002
2001 |  | 453,900

             |  | 878,145

             |  | 364,356

 |  | 

                  |  | 200,000

        | (4)   
|Howard S. Kalika(10)
vice presidentchief financial officerNTL (UK)                 |  | 2003
2002
2001 |  | 292,769

             |  | 426,161

             |  | 396,074

 |  | 

                  |  | 75,000

         | (4)   
|Richard H. Martin Jr.(10)
vice presidentfinancial service and administration        |  | 2003
2002
2001 |  | 226,224

             |  | 263,447

             |  | 430,993

 |  | 

                  |  | 20,000

         | (4)   
|Richard J. Lubasch(14)
former executive vice presidentgeneral counsel and secretary |  | 2003
2002
2001 |  | 297,914
467,290
233,692 |  | 238,500
470,000
384,875 |  | 

       |  | 402,182

            |  | 80,000

         | (4)   

---

92

---



93

---

Option Grants for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003(1)

|                      |  |         |  |        |  |       |  |                   |  | Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation for Option Term
|--------------------- |  | ------- |  | ------ |  | ----- |  | ----------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|Simon P. Duffy        |  | 260,000 |  | 6.65%  |  | 15.00 |  | April 10, 2013    |  | 335,126                                                                                       
|Barclay Knapp         |  | 400,000 |  | 10.23% |  | 15.00 |  | April 10, 2013    |  | 515,579                                                                                       
|James F. Mooney       |  | 100,000 |  | 2.56%  |  | 9.85  |  | March 27, 2013    |  | 643,895                                                                                       
|                      |  | 300,000 |  | 7.67%  |  | 15.00 |  | March 27, 2013    |  | 386,684                                                                                       
|Scott E. Schubert     |  | 200,000 |  | 5.12%  |  | 15.00 |  | April 10, 2013    |  | 257,789                                                                                       
|Howard S. Kalika      |  | 75,000  |  | 1.92%  |  | 15.00 |  | April 10, 2013    |  | 96,671                                                                                        
|Richard H. Martin Jr. |  | 20,000  |  | 0.51%  |  | 15.00 |  | April 10, 2013    |  | 25,779                                                                                        
|Richard L. Lubasch    |  | 80,000  |  | 2.05%  |  | 15.00 |  | November 14, 2006 |  | 103,116                                                                                       

---

Aggregated Option Exercises for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003 and Fiscal Year-End Option Values

The following table sets forth information with respect to the exercise of options to purchase our common stock by the named executive officers during 2003, the
number of securities underlying unexercised options held by the named executive officers on December 31, 2003, and the potential realizable value of unexercised
in-the-money options held by the named executive officers on that date. All options to purchase NTL Europe common stock were cancelled on January 10, 2003.

|                      |  |         |  |           |  | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year End (#) |  |         |  |          
|--------------------- |  | ------- |  | --------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------- |  | ---------
|
|
|
|Simon P. Duffy        |  |        |  |          |  |                                                                           |  | 260,000 |  |         
|Barclay Knapp         |  | 133,333 |  | 5,842,652 |  | 66,667                                                                     |  |        |  | 3,650,018
|James F. Mooney       |  |        |  |          |  | 160,000                                                                    |  | 240,000 |  | 9,275,000
|Scott E. Schubert     |  |        |  |          |  |                                                                           |  | 200,000 |  |         
|Howard S. Kalika      |  |        |  |          |  |                                                                           |  | 75,000  |  |         
|Richard H. Martin Jr. |  |        |  |          |  |                                                                           |  | 20,000  |  |         
|Richard J. Lubasch    |  | 10,000  |  | 438,200   |  | 10,000                                                                     |  |        |  | 607,500  

---

Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans and Arrangements

Each of the agreements and plans discussed below contain the full legal text of the matters described in this section. We have filed copies of each of these
agreements with the Commission.

Employment Agreements and Severance Arrangements

We entered into an agreement, effective March 2003, with Mr. Mooney relating to his service as the chairman of our board of directors for a period
of up to five years. As set forth in that agreement, we will provide to Mr. Mooney the following compensation and employee benefits:



94

---







Mr. Mooney
has agreed that he will not sell any shares of our common stock acquired under his agreement with us until after March 1, 2004, his first anniversary as our
chairman.

Effective
as of August 15, 2003, Simon P. Duffy replaced Mr. Knapp as our chief executive officer. Mr. Duffy had served as our chief operating officer since
March 2003. Mr. Duffy's employment agreement with us covers the period from March 31, 2003 through December 31, 2004 and provides for the following:



95

---



In
light of Mr. Duffy's promotion to chief executive officer and later promotion to president, we are discussing with Mr. Duffy appropriate arrangements related to
compensation and other employment terms. Although we have not agreed to any new definitive arrangements, we may award to Mr. Duffy additional compensation for 2003 for the period from which he
assumed the position of chief executive officer. In addition, on January 16, 2004, Mr. Duffy was awarded options to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to the NTL 2003
Stock Option Plan with an exercise price of $71.06 vesting over a four to five year period.

We
are also a party to employment agreements with Mr. Schubert, Mr. Kalika and Mr. Martin. These agreements are substantially similar to Mr. Duffy's
agreement, other than with respect to each executive's title and the following:



Each
agreement provides for the following in the event the executive is terminated:



96

---



The
definition of a change of control in each of our employment agreements is substantially the same as the definition of an acceleration event under the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan, as
discussed below.

As
of the close of business on August 15, 2003, Mr. Knapp was no longer an employee or director of ours. We entered into a separation and consulting agreement with
Mr. Knapp effective as of August 15, 2003 that provided that he will perform consulting services for us until December 31, 2003. The termination of Mr. Knapp was a
termination without cause, which entitled him under his employment agreement to receive severance in an amount equal to three times his base salary at the time of his termination, or
$2.1 million. The 32,609 shares of restricted common stock held in escrow on behalf of Mr. Knapp were released immediately upon the effectiveness of a release set forth in the separation
and consulting agreement. In addition, pursuant to the award agreement we previously entered into with Mr. Knapp, the vesting of options to purchase 133,333 shares of our common stock was
automatically accelerated. These options were exercised by Mr. Knapp on November 5, 2003. In consideration for the consulting services that Mr. Knapp provided to us:



Mr. Knapp
also received a bonus in cash in an amount equal to $653,014.

As
of August 15, 2003, Mr. Lubasch ceased employment with us, and we entered into a severance agreement with him. The termination of Mr. Lubasch was a termination
without cause, which entitled him to receive severance in an amount equal to three times his base salary under his employment agreement, or approximately $1.4 million. We also vested and
released from escrow 22,220 shares of restricted common stock to Mr. Lubasch. In addition, pursuant to award agreements we entered into with Mr. Lubasch, the vesting of options to
purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock was automatically accelerated, and these options may be exercised at any time through November 14, 2006. All remaining options were automatically
terminated. Pursuant to the NTL Group 2003 Bonus Scheme, Mr. Lubasch received a bonus in an amount equal to 50% of his base salary at the time of his

97

---

termination,
which was paid half in cash and half in shares of our common stock. Mr. Lubasch received 3,014 shares of our common stock and approximately $119,000 in cash. The severance
agreement with Mr. Lubasch also provides for the following:



The
following is a summary of the terms of the employment agreements between us and each of Messrs. Knapp and Lubasch. These employment agreements are substantially similar in all
material respects except with respect to each executive's title and base salary. Mr. Knapp's title was presidentchief executive officer, and his base salary was $700,000.
Mr. Lubasch's title was executive vice presidentgeneral counsel and his base salary was $477,000.

Each
of these employment agreements provided for the following:



Except
as modified by the severance agreement with Mr. Lubasch and the separation and consulting agreement with Mr. Knapp, the employment agreements for
Messrs. Knapp and Lubasch remain in effect including the confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation provisions contained in each agreement.

NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan

The following is a description of the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan, which we refer to as the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan. The compensation committee of our board,
effective as of January 10, 2003 adopted the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan. The NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan is intended to encourage stock ownership of us and to give incentives to our employees,
directors and independent contractors to remain in our employment or service and to put forth maximum efforts for the success of the business.

98

---

The
NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and nonqualified stock options.
The aggregate number of shares of our common stock that may be subject to options granted under the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan is 5,000,000, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain
enumerated corporate transactions. An individual may not be granted options to purchase more than 750,000 shares of our common stock in any fiscal year. The NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan is designed so
that option grants are able to comply with the requirements for "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and the conditions for exemption from the
short-swing profit recovery rules of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The
compensation committee of our board administers the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan and generally has the right to grant options to eligible individuals, to determine the terms and
conditions of all option grants, including the vesting schedule and exercise price, and to amend, suspend or terminate the plan at any time. All option grants made pursuant to the NTL 2003 Stock
Option Plan will be evidenced by an option notice which will state the terms and conditions of the option grant as determined by the compensation committee.

Individuals
eligible to receive grants under the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan include our employees, officers, directors, non-employee directors and independent contractors.
The term of an incentive stock option may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant and the term of a nonqualified stock option may not exceed 11 years from the date of grant.

All
outstanding options will become immediately exercisable in full upon the occurrence of an acceleration event. An acceleration event generally means:



The
following table, as of December 31, 2003, sets forth the number of shares of our common stock that are covered by the incentive stock options and the nonqualified stock
options that we have

99

---

granted
in 2003 pursuant to the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan. See "Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans and ArrangementsEmployment Agreements and Severance Arrangements."

Total No. of Shares
of our Common Stock
Subject to Outstanding
Stock OptionsDirectors:James F. Mooney(1)

400,000Simon P. Duffy(2)

260,000Edwin M. Banks

75,000Jeffrey D. Benjamin

75,000David Elstein

75,000Charles K. Gallagher

75,000William R. Huff

75,000Brett G. Wyard

75,000George R. Zoffinger

75,000Present Executive Officers that are not Directors:Scott E. Schubert

200,000Robert C. Gale

12,000Howard S. Kalika

75,000Richard H. Martin Jr.

20,000All Present Directors and Exective Officers as a Group:(13 persons)

1,492,000Former Executive Officers:Barclay Knapp

66,667Richard J. Lubasch

10,000


---

NTL Group 2003 Bonus Scheme

Our employees, excluding certain commissioned sales representatives, were eligible to participate in our 2003 Bonus Scheme. This scheme offered employees an
opportunity to receive a bonus equal to a percentage of their base salary. The percentages are up to 6% for employees, up to 30% for senior managers and a range from up to 60% to up to 200% for senior
executives. Bonus payments were based on achieving certain set company performance targets for the six months ended June 30, 2003, which was paid shortly after we announced our second quarter
results of operations, and for the year ended December 31, 2003, which will be paid in late March 2004. Bonus payments are generally paid in cash. Some of our senior executives will receive
half of their bonus payments in common stock which will be issued to them on the anniversary of their entitlement date. The number of shares of common stock that will be issued will be equal to the
cash amount of the bonus divided by the market price for our stock on the entitlement date. However, we retain the discretion not to issue this common stock and instead pay cash in an amount equal to
the market value of the common stock that would have been issued. Because of Nasdaq rules, we will exercise the discretion to pay cash to any of our executive officers who is in this category of
senior executives. Entitlements for Messrs. Duffy, Schubert, Kalika and Martin under the 2003 Bonus Scheme are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.

100

---

NTL Group 2004 Bonus Scheme

We recently adopted our 2004 Bonus Scheme that is substantially similar to our 2003 Bonus Scheme. The main difference between these two bonus schemes is that for
the 2004 Bonus Scheme we have set new performance targets that must be reached to qualify for a bonus payment.

Payments
under the 2004 Bonus Scheme will be made in two instalments. The first instalment will be made shortly after we have announced our second quarter results of operations and the
second instalment will be made shortly after we have announced year end results of operations. Some of the payment to senior executives may be made in shares of common stock subject to shareholder
approval.

Upon
the achievement of performance targets pursuant to the 2004 Bonus Scheme:



Long-term Incentive Plan

We adopted the NTL Group Long-term Incentive Plan, or LTIP, which provides for a bonus payment to participants in the event that specified targets and performance
indicators are met during the 3-year period commencing January 1, 2003. The purpose of the LTIP is to recognize and reward executive contribution, focus achievement on agreed
targets and promote attraction and retention of key personnel.

Approximately
1% of the total employee population, participate in the LTIP. The chief executive officer, chief financial officer and group HR director may designate additional
individuals as participants in the LTIP.

We
will pay bonuses earned under the LTIP in 2006. These bonuses will be paid at our discretion in cash, our common stock or a combination of cash or common stock. Stockholder approval
of the LTIP would be required before any payments can be made in our common stock.

Upon
the achievement of the three year performance targets, pursuant to the LTIP:



If
these three year performance targets are exceeded, Messrs. Duffy, Schubert, Kalika and Martin would be entitled to incrementally higher bonuses.

Restricted Stock Grants

We have granted 200,000 shares of restricted common stock to Mr. Mooney, 16,667 shares of which vested on March 31, 2003, and the remainder of which
vest and will be released from escrow over a three-year period.

In
connection with our emergence from Chapter 11, a total of 133,912 shares of restricted stock were granted to some of our then executive officers and other employees and delivered into
escrow

101

---

pursuant
to their employment agreements. The following chart lists the shares of restricted stock granted to our executive officers and directors.

Total No. of Shares
of Restricted StockDirectors:James F. Mooney(1)

200,000Simon P. Duffy(2)

0Edwin M. Banks

0Jeffrey D. Benjamin

0David Elstein

0Charles K. Gallagher

0William R. Huff

0Brett G. Wyard

0George R. Zoffinger

0Present Executive Officers that are not Directors:Scott E. Schubert

0Robert C. Gale

0Howard S. Kalika

0Richard H. Martin Jr.

0All Present Directors and Executive Officers as a Group:(13 persons)

200,000Former Executive Officers:Barclay Knapp(3)

32,609Richard J. Lubasch(4)

22,220


---

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2002, we did not have a compensation committee as we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of NTL Europe and did not independently establish compensation for the
officers of NTL Europe who were also serving as our officers. The present members of the compensation committee of our board of directors are all independent directors.

102

---



Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth, as of March 10, 2004, information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as well as information regarding
some of our executive officers, directors and affiliates who may offer or sell their rights, assuming that all stockholders exercise their basic subscription privilege and do not exercise any
over-subscription privilege. The table includes:



Except
as otherwise indicated, the person or entities listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them, except
to the extent that power may be shared with a spouse. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each individual listed below is, 909 Third Avenue, Suite 2863 New York, New York 10022.

103

---

|                                                                     |  | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1) |      |           |         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------- | ---- | --------- | --------
|
|5% stockholders:                                                     |  |                                              |      |           |         
|FMR Corp.(2)                                                         |  | 12,941,765                                   |      | 68,006    |         
|W.R. Huff Asset Management Co., L.L.C.(3)                            |  | 11,221,589                                   |      |          |         
|Franklin Mutual Adviser, LLC(4)                                      |  | 7,256,594                                    |      |          |         
|France Telecom(5)                                                    |  |                                             |      | 7,118,945 |         
|Oaktree Capital Management, LLC(6)                                   |  | 6,200,771                                    |      |          |         
|Wellington Management Company, LLP(7)                                |  | 5,163,802                                    |      |          |         
|American Express Financial Corporation(8)                            |  | 5,010,360                                    |      |          |         
|Massachusetts Financial Services Company(9)                          |  | 4,555,152                                    |      |          |         
|Directors:(10)                                                       |  |                                              |      |           |         
|James F. Mooney(11)                                                  |  | 258,335                                      |      |          |         
|Simon P. Duffy                                                       |  | 86,667                                       |      |          |         
|Edwin M. Banks                                                       |  | 25,000                                       |      |          |         
|Jeffrey D. Benjamin                                                  |  | 64,172                                       |      |          |         
|David Elstein                                                        |  | 25,000                                       |      |          |         
|Charles K. Gallagher                                                 |  |                                             |      |          |         
|William R. Huff(3)                                                   |  | 11,246,589                                   |      |          |         
|Brett G. Wyard(6)                                                    |  | 6,225,771                                    |      |          |         
|George Zoffinger                                                     |  | 25,000                                       |      |          |         
|Present executive officers that are not directors:(12)               |  |                                              |      |           |         
|Scott E. Schubert                                                    |  | 66,667                                       |      |          |         
|Robert C. Gale                                                       |  | 2,400                                        |      |          |         
|Howard S. Kalika                                                     |  | 25,000                                       |      |          |         
|Richard H. Martin Jr.                                                |  | 4,000                                        |      |          |         
|All present directors and executive officers as a group:(13 persons) |  | 18,054,601                                   |      |          |         
|Former executive officers:(13)                                       |  |                                              |      |           |         
|Barclay Knapp                                                        |  | 232,609                                      | (13) | 4,703     | (14)    
|Richard J. Lubasch                                                   |  | 45,234                                       | (13) | 626       | (14)(15)

---

104

---

105

---



106

---

107

---



Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table includes information in respect of our equity compensation plans and any individual compensation arrangements under which our equity
securities are authorized for issuance to employees or non-employees as of December 31, 2003.

|                                                           |  |           |     |   |       | (c) |          
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------- | --- | - | ----- | --- | ---------
|
|
|
|
|Equity compensation plans approved by security holders     |  | 3,229,967 | (1) | $ | 13.85 |     | 1,549,200
|Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |  |          |     |   |      |     | 67,546   
|                                                           |  |           |     |   |       |     |          
|Total                                                      |  | 3,229,967 |     | $ | 13.85 |     | 1,616,746
|                                                           |  |           |     |   |       |     |          

---

108

---



Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

We have entered into several transactions with related parties as described below. The agreements described in this section contain the full legal text of the
matters discussed in this section. We have filed copies of these agreements with the SEC.

Participating Purchaser Agreements

In connection with our rights offering, on September 26, 2003, we entered into two separate participating purchaser agreements with each of W.R. Huff Asset
Management and Franklin Mutual Advisers. Each participating purchaser currently holds shares of our common stock or is the general partner or investment manager of managed funds and third party
accounts that directly hold shares of our common stock.

Under
these agreements, W.R. Huff Asset Management and Franklin Mutual Advisers each agreed, in exchange for the fee described below, to exercise the basic subscription privilege for all
of the rights distributed to them in the rights offering. This means W.R. Huff Asset Management purchased 4,582,594 shares of our common stock for $40.00 and Franklin Mutual Advisers purchased
2,974,908 shares of our common stock for $40.00. W.R. Huff Asset Management also purchased approximately 25,000 shares of our common stock for $40.00 pursuant to the over-subscription
privilege available to all rights holders in the offering. Franklin Mutual Advisers also purchased 35,752 shares of our common stock for $40.00 pursuant to the over-subscription privilege
available to all rights holders in the offering. Certain affiliates and managed accounts for which W.R. Huff Asset Management acts as an investment adviser are entitled to receive a fee of
$5.3 million and certain funds for which Franklin Mutual Advisers acts as agent or investment adviser have received a fee of $3.4 million.

The
shares of our common stock which each participating purchaser received upon the exercise of rights which the participating purchaser committed to exercise are restricted stock under
the Securities Act of 1933. Accordingly, we have entered into a registration rights agreement with each participating purchaser as well as Oaktree. We filed a registration statement on
February 13, 2004, to fulfil our obligations under these registration rights agreements, which registration statement is not yet effective.

Chapter 11 Reorganization and Exit Notes

At the time of our emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, we issued shares of our common stock and Series A warrants to various former creditors and
stockholders of NTL Europe, and some of its subsidiaries, including us. Our principal stockholders received a significant amount of their equity interest in us from that issuance.

Registration Rights Agreements

At the time of our emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, we granted various registration rights to certain of the persons who were then our stockholders and
warrantholders. We have filed a registration statement to fulfil our obligations related to these registration rights.

Our Relationship with NTL Europe

At the time of the completion of the Plan, we have entered into several agreements with NTL Europe, including a Transitional Services Agreement, a
De-Merger Agreement, a Novation Agreement and a Tax Sharing Agreement.

Transitional Services Agreement

Under the Transitional Services Agreement, we have agreed to provide NTL Europe with some administrative and technical support services for a limited period of
time where our personnel had

109

---

previously
been providing support to the companies now within the NTL Europe group of companies. We agreed to provide NTL Europe with support if and when requested in the following areas: accounting,
payroll and financial reporting support, technical assistance to NTL Europe's Spanish business, access to our internal legal and tax advisors with respect to historic matters and continued support in
the management and monitoring of some of the joint ventures in which NTL Europe has investments. This agreement provides that our employees may, as appropriate, prioritize work performed for us ahead
of work performed on behalf of NTL Europe.

In
addition, under the Transitional Services Agreement, we provide the services of two of our employees to NTL Europe seconded on a full-time basis for a period of up to two
years, at NTL Europe's option, and permit NTL Europe and its group companies to continue to use the "NTL" name for a period of up to one year, in the case of NTL Europe, and three
years, in the case of some other of its subsidiaries.

NTL
Europe pays us pre-determined charges set out in the Transitional Services Agreement for the services provided by us and our subsidiaries under the agreement based on the
amount of time spent by the relevant personnel in carrying out this work.

Demerger Agreement

The Demerger Agreement enables NTL Europe and us to have access to records and documents that they and we require but which are held by or in the control of the
other. In addition, the agreement provides that, to the extent possible, all warranties, indemnities or liabilities relating to assets or companies which we currently own, but which were originally
acquired by NTL Europe or one of its subsidiaries before being transferred to us or one of our subsidiaries, are transferred to us or we are given the benefit of the warranties, covenants and
indemnities relating to these assets or companies.

There
is no specified list of contracts to which the Demerger Agreement applies. Instead it is agreed that the Demerger Agreement will not apply to the agreements dealt with under the
Novation Agreement described below.

Novation Agreement

In May 2000, NTL Europe completed the acquisition of ConsumerCo. NTL Europe transferred ConsumerCo to us and our subsidiaries in February 2001
pursuant to an agreement originally signed in July 1999.

On
January 10, 2003, we, NTL Europe and C&W and some of their respective subsidiaries entered into a Novation Agreement. The agreement transfers the remaining rights and
obligations under the July 1999 transaction agreement and other related ancillary transaction documents from NTL Europe to us, except for C&W's rights as a shareholder in NTL Europe or relating
to securities of NTL Europe. The transferred rights and obligations include representations and warranties given by C&W in respect of ConsumerCo, mutual tax indemnities related to some tax matters
concerning ConsumerCo and the
transfer of some properties between ConsumerCo and C&W where the relevant properties are owned by C&W or ConsumerCo but used by the other.

Tax Sharing Agreement

Until consummation of the Plan, we were a part of a federal consolidated income tax group having NTL Europe as the common parent corporation. Under the Plan, we
separated from the NTL Europe group, becoming a separate federal consolidated tax group. We entered into a Tax Sharing Agreement which allocates rights and responsibilities for tax matters between us
and NTL Europe and its affiliates.

In
general, we will have control over, and be responsible for, the preparation and filing of our own tax returns and also any joint tax returns that include us and the NTL Europe
companies. NTL Europe

110

---

will
reimburse us for 14.5% of the costs associated with our preparation of joint returns, including the federal income tax returns for 2002 and 2003.

Although
it is not anticipated that there will be any federal income tax liability for 2002 or the portion of 2003 during which we are included in a joint return with NTL Europe, we will
be liable for any tax liability attributable to us and NTL Europe will be liable for any tax liability attributable to NTL Europe and its affiliates. We will have the exclusive right to determine the
portion of tax liability attributable to us and NTL Europe on any reasonable basis. Any refunds of taxes paid with respect to joint returns will also be reasonably apportioned between us and NTL
Europe on a similar basis.

NTL
Europe's UK affiliates are required, as we may direct, to surrender group relief up to the maximum permitted by law to some of our UK affiliates for tax periods before, or that
include, the date of the completion of the Plan as we may direct. This group relief allows our UK affiliates to use deductions from NTL Europe's UK affiliates to reduce foreign taxable income. We also
have the ability to cause NTL Europe's UK affiliates to amend any claims for the surrender of group relief in order to give effect to such surrender.

We
have the exclusive right to control, contest and represent our interests and NTL Europe's interest in any audit relating to a joint tax return. We also have the right to resolve,
settle or agree to any deficiency, claim or adjustment proposed, asserted or assessed in connection with any joint return if the matter involved could effect us. However, NTL Europe has the exclusive
authority to handle audits that relate solely to NTL Europe or its affiliates to the extent the asserted liability or matter either:



We
have an obligation to provide NTL Europe with information to keep NTL Europe informed and to give NTL Europe an opportunity to participate in discussions with tax authorities
regarding tax issues that involve NTL Europe or its affiliates. We have the right to reasonably apportion any costs associated with responding to an audit, claim or asserted deficiency of NTL Europe.

NTL
Europe's ability to perform its continuing obligations under the Tax Sharing Agreement could be affected by a sale of some or all of its assets or by a change of control. Therefore,
NTL Europe is required to provide us with notice of any change of control of it or any of its affiliates. Finally, we and NTL Europe have customary rights and obligations to cooperate, exchange
information, provide notice and resolve disputes with respect to tax matters.

NTL's Relationship with ATX Communications, Inc.

We and ATX Communications, Inc., formerly known as CoreComm Holdco, Inc. and referred to in this annual report as ATX, both trace roots to companies
co-founded by Barclay Knapp, who was our president and chief executive officer until August 15, 2003, and George Blumenthal, who was our chairman prior to our emergence from Chapter
11 on January 10, 2003. Messrs. Knapp and Blumenthal co-founded our predecessor in 1993.

Historically,
ATX and we have had substantially overlapping directors and executive officers. At one time, all of ATX's directors were also members of our board of directors. Many of our
executive officers were also officers of ATX. For example, Mr. Knapp previously served as president and chief executive officer of ATX and is now chairman of ATX. Mr. Blumenthal
previously served as our chairman and treasurer and previously served as the chairman of ATX. Mr. Richard Lubasch was our general counsel from our formation until August 15, 2003 and
also served as general counsel for ATX

111

---

for
a substantial part of this period. Mr. Gregg Gorelick our controller from our formation until August 15, 2003 also served as the controller for ATX for a substantial part of this
period.

Until
our emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, we provided ATX with management, financial, legal and administrative support services through the use of employees, as well as access
to office space and equipment and use of supplies and related office services. The salaries of employees providing services to ATX were charged to ATX by us based on an agreed upon allocation for time
spent providing services to ATX.

Amounts
charged to ATX by us consist of direct costs allocated to ATX where identifiable and a percentage of the portion of our corporate overhead which cannot be specifically allocated
to us. Effective January 1, 2001, the percentage used to allocate corporate overhead was reduced. Our charges to ATX commenced in October 1998. It is not practicable to determine the
amounts of these expenses that would have been incurred had ATX operated as an unaffiliated entity. In the opinion of management at the time the allocations were made, this allocation method was
reasonable. We charged ATX $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 and $0.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2001.

As
part of these arrangements, at an office location separate from our corporate office, ATX provided us with access to office space and equipment and the use of supplies until
August 2001, when this office was closed. For these services, ATX charged us approximately $121,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001.

In
March 2000, ATX and we entered into an arrangement to link our networks in order to create an international Internet backbone that commenced operations in February 2001.

We
are advised that in December 2000, Mr. Knapp contributed $10,000,000, George Blumenthal, our former chairman of the board and treasurer, contributed $5,000,000, Richard
Lubasch, our former general counsel, contributed $600,000 and Ted H. McCourtney, our former director, contributed $500,000 in financing to ATX. In return, ATX issued these individuals unsecured
convertible notes, with a maturity date of 2010 and a 10.75% interest rate, to be paid semi-annually. The notes were convertible into shares of ATX common stock at $5.00 per share. Each of
these individuals
was a member of ATX's management and/or board of directors as well as a director and/or officer of ours at the time of this contribution.

On
April 12, 2001, NTL Europe entered into a funding and commercial relationship letter agreement with ATX pursuant to which NTL Europe purchased $15.0 million of an
unsecured convertible note from ATX and received warrants to purchase 770,000 shares of ATX common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share that expire in April 2011. NTL Europe only, not
us, now holds the notes and warrants. Concurrently with this note purchase, we entered into a network and software agreement with ATX. Under this agreement ATX agreed to provide us with
US network access for Internet traffic from our UK customers for three years. We incurred costs of $0.3 million for network usage in the year ended December 31, 2001. We have not
incurred any additional costs related to the network subsequent to 2001. The network remains connected, but is not in use. In addition, ATX agreed to grant us a perpetual irrevocable
royalty-free license in a provisioning and billing system software application now known as Accelerator. Accelerator allows our customers to order our services online. ATX also provides
support, hosting and development services for this software application. We are currently in the process of documenting this license and the support services to ensure that the terms of business
between ATX and ourselves are fully recorded.

On
May 18, 2001 we entered into a purchase and development agreement by which ATX licenses to us on a perpetual irrevocable royalty-free basis billing software called
Rater. Rater was being used by us at the time of this purchase and development agreement, and was being maintained and modified by ATX for us. This software rates, extracts and reports on various
services that we provide, including

112

---

telephone
calls and pay per view events. The sales price was cash of $9.8 million for the development costs expended by ATX plus a fixed amount of $3.0 million representing the
one-time license fee. In addition, under this purchase and development agreement, ATX also provides support and development services for this software. We are currently in the process of
negotiating an amendment to the purchase and development agreement to ensure that the full terms of the commercial relationship between ATX and ourselves are fully documented, in particular the work
required to be performed by ATX.

We
have been billed by ATX for the support, maintenance and development of Rater and Accelerator that we have received from ATX. ATX billed us $2.8 million in the year ended
December 31, 2003, $2.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2002, and $3.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2001 for these services. In the past, we
voluntarily prepaid some services provided by ATX. At the present time, we pay ATX on a time and materials basis on 30-day invoices.

After
we emerged from Chapter 11 reorganization, the reconstituted audit committee of our board of directors reviewed, with the assistance of outside counsel, the appropriateness of the
transactions with ATX described above. We have instituted controls and procedures that would be required before
similar types of transactions are entered into in the future. None of the persons who held positions with both ATX and us remain employed by us.

113

---



Item 14.    Principal Accountants Fees and Services

Ernst & Young LLP are our principal accountants. We provide in the table below an analysis of the fees charged to us by Ernst & Young in the each of
the two years ended December 31, 2003 (in millions).

December 31,2003

2002Reorganized
Company

Predecessor
CompanyAudit fees

$
5.1

$
3.3Audit-Related fees


0.2


3.9Tax fees


4.7


5.1All other fees





$
10.0

$
12.3


Audit fees.Audit fees represent the aggregate services provided to us by Ernst & Young for professional services
rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our Form 10-K, including accounting consultations on matters addressed
during the audit and interim reviews. These fees also include services that are provided in connection with our statutory and regulatory filings, including our 2003 rights offering.

Audit-Related fees.Audit-Related fees represent the aggregate fees charged for assurance and related services by
Ernst & Young that are related to the audit or review of our financial statements, including other accounting consultations. Audit-Related services include advice relating to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 including advice on reporting on internal controls under Section 404.

Tax fees.Tax fees represent the aggregate fees charged for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young for tax
compliance, tax advice and tax planning. Tax services included compliance work regarding the preparation and filing of our US, UK and Irish tax returns, and consulting and advising on issues arising
from our bankruptcy and in relation to our rights offering.

All other fees.All other fees represent the aggregate fees charged for all other products and services provided by
Ernst & Young.

Audit Committee's pre-approval policies and procedures

The Audit Committee's policy on pre-approval requirements for audit and other services provided to us by Ernst & Young is as follows:



114

---





PART IV

Item 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

115

---



EXHIBIT INDEX

|Exhibit
No. |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|----------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2.1         |  | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 9, 2000, by and Among NTL Incorporated (now NTL Europe, Inc.), NTL Holdings Incorporated (now NTL (Delaware), Inc.) and Holdings Merger Sub Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3/A filed by NTL (Delaware), Inc. and NTL Incorporated on July 14, 2000, File No. 333-36434)
|2.2         |  | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 26, 1999, by and Among NTL Incorporated (now NTL (Delaware), Inc.), NTL Communications Corp. (now NTL Incorporated) and NTL Mergerco, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment No. 2 to
The Registration Statement on Form S-3/A filed by NTL Incorporated And NTL Communications Corp. on June 3, 1999, File No. 333-72335)      
|2.3         |  | Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, dated as of February 4, 1998, as amended, by and among NTL Incorporated, NTL (Bermuda) Limited, And Comcast UK Cable Partners Limited (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by
NTL Incorporated on September 30, 1998, File No. 333-64727)                                                                                  
|2.4         |  | Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, dated as of May 28, 1998, by and among NTL Incorporated, NTL(Bermuda) Limited and Comcast UK Cable Partners Limited (Incorporated by reference to Annex B to the Registration Statement on Form S-4
filed by NTL Incorporated on September 30, 1998, File No. 333-64727)                                                                      
|2.5         |  | Amendment No. 2 to Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, dated as of August 14, 1998 by and among NTL Incorporated, NTL (Bermuda) Limited and Comcast UK Cable Partners Limited (Incorporated by reference to Annex C to the Registration Statement on Form
S-4 filed by NTL Incorporated on September 30, 1998, File No. 333-64727)                                                                   
|2.6         |  | Share Exchange Agreement, dated as of June 16, 1998, as amended, by and among NTL Incorporated and the shareholders of Diamond Cable Communications Limited (Incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Proxy Statement filed by NTL Incorporated on
January 29, 1999, File No. 000-22616)                                                                                                          
|2.7         |  | Amendment No. 1 to Share Exchange Agreement, dated as of December21, 1998, by and among NTL Incorporated and the shareholders of Diamond Cable Communications Limited (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
by NTL Incorporated on December 23, 1998, File No. 000-22616)                                                                               
|2.8         |  | Restated Transaction Agreement, dated as of July 26, 1999, by and among, Bell Atlantic Corporation, Cable and Wireless PLC, Cable, Wireless Communications PLC and NTL Incorporated (Incorporated by reference to Annex J to the Proxy Statement filed by
NTL Incorporated on February 11, 2000, File No. 000-25691)                                                                                 
|2.9         |  | Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Plan of NTL Incorporated and Certain Subsidiaries, dated July 15, 2002 (as subsequently modified) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.8 of NTL Incorporated's Registration Statement on Form S-1(File No.
333-103135) filed on February 12, 2003 as amended on June 28, 2003                                                                         
|3.1         |  | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of NTL Communications Corp. (now NTL Incorporated) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed by NTL Incorporated on January 10, 2003, File No.
000-22616)                                                                                                                                            
|3.2*        |  | Amended and Restated By-Laws of NTL Incorporated (as of November 11, 2003)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      

116

---

|4.1  |  | Equity Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 10, 2003, by and among NTL Incorporated and the stockholders listed on the signature pages thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by NTL
Incorporated on January 10, 2003, File No. 000-22616)                                                                                                                            
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|4.2  |  | Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2003, by and among NTL Incorporated, the Guarantors listed on the signature pages thereto and the initial purchasers of the Notes listed on the signature pages thereto (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by NTL Incorporated on January 10, 2003, File No. 000-22616)                                              
|4.3  |  | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2003, between NTL Incorporated and W.R. Huff Asset Management Co., L.L.C. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                                                                                                                                                                                           
|4.4  |  | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2003, between NTL Incorporated and Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC on behalf of and in its capacity as agent and investment manager for various holders (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4
to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                                                                                                               
|4.5  |  | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2003, between NTL Incorporated and Oaktree Capital Management, LLC on behalf of and in its capacity as the general partner or investment manager of certain funds and accounts it manages
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                                                                           
|4.6  |  | Indenture, dated as of January 9, 2003, by and among NTL Incorporated, the Guarantors listed on the signature pages thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K
filed by NTL Incorporated on January 10, 2003, File No. 000-22616)                                                                                                              
|4.7  |  | Indenture, dated as of November 15, 1995, by and between Comcast UK Cable Partners Limited and Bank of Montreal Trust Company as Trustee with respect to the 11.20% Senior Discount Debentures due 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed by Comcast UK Cable Partners Limited on November 5, 1995, File No. 33-96932)                                    
|4.8  |  | First Supplemental Indenture, dated October 29, 1998, by and between NTL (Bermuda) Limited (now NTL (Triangle) LLC) and Bank of Montreal Trust Company as Trustee, with respect to the 11.20% Senior Discount Debentures due 2007 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by NTL(Triangle) LLC (formerly known as Comcast UK Cable Partners Limited) on November 4, 1998, File No. 000-24792)
|4.9  |  | Indenture, dated as of February 6, 1998, by and among Diamond Holdings plc, Diamond Cable Communications plc,, and The Bank of New York as Trustee, with respect to the 10% Senior Notes due February 1, 2008 and 91/8% Senior
Notes due February 1, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed by Diamond Cable Communications plc on March 20, 1998, File No. 333-48413)        
|4.10 |  | Series A Warrant Agreement, dated as of January 10, 2003, by and between NTL Incorporated and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Warrant Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed by
filed by NTL Incorporated on January 10, 2003, File No. 000-22616)                                                                                                               
|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

117

---

|4.11 |  | Rights Agreement, dated as of January 10, 2003, by and between NTL Incorporated and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed by filed by
NTL Incorporated on January 10, 2003, File No. 000-22616)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|4.12 |  | Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2003, by and between NTL Incorporated and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1,
File No. 333-109194)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|10.1 |  | Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2003, by and among NTL Incorporated, the Guarantors listed on the signature pages thereto and the initial purchasers of the Notes listed on the signature pages thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by NTL Incorporated on January 10, 2003, File No. 000-22616)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|10.2 |  | £2,500,000,000 Credit Agreement originally dated May 30, 2000, and made among, NTL Communications Limited; NTL Business Limited (which novated its rights and obligations to NTL Investment Holdings Limited); NTL Communications Corp.; J.P. Morgan
plc (formerly known as Chase Manhattan plc); Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Bank Limited; J.P. Morgan Europe Limited (formerly known as Chase Manhattan International Limited) and the lenders party thereto (as amended, varied, supplemented, novated and
restated to date and from time to time) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by NTL Incorporated on January 10, 2003, File No. 000-22616)
|10.3 |  | £1,300,000,000 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement originally dated May 30, 2000, among, NTL Communications Corp.; NTL (UK) Group, Inc.; NTL Communications Ltd; J.P. Morgan plc (formerly known as Chase Manhattan plc); Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter Bank Ltd and Chase Manhattan International Ltd (as amended, varied, supplemented, novated and restated to date and from time to time) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by NTL Incorporated
on January 10, 2003, File No. 000-22616)                                                                                                                                                        
|10.4 |  | Tax Sharing Agreement, dated January 10, 2003, by and between NTL Europe, Inc. and its affiliates, and NTL Incorporated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by NTL Incorporated on January 10, 2003, File
No. 000-22616)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|10.5 |  | Transitional Services Agreement, dated January 10, 2003, by and between NTL Europe, Inc. and NTL Incorporated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by NTL Incorporated on January 10, 2003, File No.
000-22616)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.6 |  | De-Merger Agreement, dated January 10, 2003, by and between NTL Europe, Inc. and NTL Incorporated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by NTL Incorporated on January 10, 2003, File No. 000-22616)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|10.7 |  | Novation Agreement, dated January 9, 2003, by and among NTL Communications Corp., NTL Incorporated, NTL (Delaware), Inc., various subsidiaries of NTL Incorporated, Cable & Wireless Public Limited Company and various subsidiaries of Cable &
Wireless (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by NTL Incorporated on January 10, 2003, File No. 000-22616)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|10.8 |  | Form of 2003 Stock Option Plan of NTL Incorporated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by NTL Incorporated on February 12, 2003, File No. 333-103135)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|10.9 |  | Summary Terms of NTL Group 2003 Bonus Scheme (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

118

---

|10.10 |  | Framework Agreement For The Provision of IT Outsourcing Services, dated as of May 23, 2001, by and between NTL Group Limited and IBM United Kingdom Limited (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed by
NTL Incorporated on April 16, 2001, File No. 0-30673)                                                                                          
|----- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|10.11 |  | Amendment, dated as of April 5, 2002 to the Framework Agreement For The Provision of IT Outsourcing Services, dated as of May 23, 2001, by and between NTL Group Limited IBM United Kingdom Limited and IBM United Kingdom Financial Services Limited
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by NTL Incorporated on April 16, 2001, File No. 0-30673)
|10.12 |  | Amendment, dated as of September 30, 2003 to Framework Agreement for the Provision of IT Outsourcing Services, dated as of May 23, 2001, by and among NTL Group Limited, IBM United Kingdom Limited and IBM United Kingdom Financial Services Limited
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                   
|10.13 |  | Employment Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2002 between NTL Communications Corp. (now NTL Incorporated) and Barclay Knapp (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of NTL Incorporated's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-103135)
filed on February 12, 2003, as amended on June 25, 2003                                                                                        
|10.14 |  | Employment Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2002 between NTL Communications Corp. (now NTL Incorporated) and Richard J. Lubasch (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the NTL Incorporated's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-103135) filed on February 12, 2003, as amended on June 25, 2003                                                                               
|10.15 |  | Employment Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2002 between NTL Communications Corp. (now NTL Incorporated) and Bret Richter (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of NTL Incorporated's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-103135)
filed on February 12, 2003, as amended on June 25, 2003)                                                                                        
|10.16 |  | Employment Agreement, dated as of January 10, 2003 between NTL Communications Corp. (now NTL Incorporated) and Gregg Gorelick (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of NTL Incorporated's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-103135)
filed on February 12, 2003, as amended on June 25, 2003)                                                                                      
|10.17 |  | Employment Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2002 between NTL Communications Corp. (now NTL Incorporated) and Lauren H. Blair (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of NTL Incorporated's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-103135)
filed on February 12, 2003, as amended on June 25, 2003)                                                                                     
|10.18 |  | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2003 between NTL Incorporated and Simon Duffy (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|10.19 |  | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2003 between NTL Incorporated and Howard Kalika (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|10.20 |  | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2003 between NTL Incorporated and Richard Martin (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                                                                                                                                                                                                
|      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

119

---

|10.21  |  | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2003 between NTL Incorporated and Scott Schubert (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                            
|------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|10.22  |  | Employment Agreement, between NTL Incorporated and Stephen Carter Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                                    
|10.23  |  | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2003 between NTL Incorporated and James F. Mooney (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                      
|10.24  |  | Compromise Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2002 between NTL Incorporated and Stephen Carter (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                         
|10.25  |  | Severance Agreement, dated as of June 2003 between NTL Incorporated and Richard J. Lubasch (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                             
|10.26  |  | Severance Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2003 between NTL Incorporated and Lauren H. Blair (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                            
|10.27  |  | Severance Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2003 between NTL Incorporated and Gregg Gorelick (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                             
|10.28  |  | Severance Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2003 between NTL Incorporated and Jared L. Gurfein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                           
|10.29  |  | Severance Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2003 between NTL Incorporated and Bret Richter (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                               
|10.30  |  | Separation and Consulting Agreement, dated as of September 23, 2003 between NTL Incorporated and Barclay Knapp (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)         
|10.31  |  | Restricted Stock Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2003 between NTL Incorporated and James F. Mooney (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-109194)                    
|10.32  |  | Form of Director and Officer Indemnity Agreement and a schedule of persons to whom the agreement has been provided (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed File No. 333-109194)
|10.33* |  | Long-term Incentive Plan                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|11.1*  |  | Computation of per share earnings                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|12.1*  |  | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                                                                                                                                                                  
|14.1*  |  | Code of Ethics                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

120

---

|21.1  |  | Subsidiaries of the registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 , File No. 333-109194)                                    
|----- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|23.1* |  | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP                                                                                                                                                  
|31.1* |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act                 
|31.2* |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act                                                                 
|32.1* |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

---

121

---



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated:
March 11, 2004

| |  | NTL INCORPORATED
| |  | ----------------
| |  | By:             

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.

|Name                                      |  | Title                                           |  | Date          
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|                                          |  |                                                 |  |               
|/s/SIMON P. DUFFYSimon P. Duffy           |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |  | March 11, 2004
|/s/SCOTT E. SCHUBERTScott E. Schubert     |  | Chief Financial Officer                         |  | March 11, 2004
|/s/ROBERT C. GALERobert C. Gale           |  | Vice PresidentController                       |  | March 11, 2004
|/s/JEFFREY D. BENJAMINJeffrey D. Benjamin |  | Director                                        |  | March 11, 2004
|/s/EDWIN M. BANKSEdwin M. Banks           |  | Director                                        |  | March 11, 2004
|/s/DAVID ELSTEINDavid Elstein             |  | Director                                        |  | March 11, 2004
|/s/WILLIAM R. HUFFWilliam R. Huff         |  | Director                                        |  | March 11, 2004
|                                          |  |                                                 |  |               

122

---

|/s/JAMES F. MOONEYJames F. Mooney           |  | Director |  | March 11, 2004
|------------------------------------------- |  | -------- |  | --------------
|/s/GEORGE R. ZOFFINGERGeorge R. Zoffinger   |  | Director |  | March 11, 2004
|/s/CHARLES K. GALLAGHERCharles K. Gallagher |  | Director |  | March 11, 2004
|/s/BRETT G. WYARDBrett G. Wyard             |  | Director |  | March 11, 2004

123

---



FORM 10KItem 15(a)(1) and (2)    NTL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following consolidated financial statements of NTL Incorporated (formerly NTL Communications Corp.) and Subsidiaries are included in Item 8:

|Report of Independent Auditors                                                                         |  | F-2 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----
|Consolidated Balance SheetsDecember 31, 2003 and 2002                                                 |  | F-3 
|Consolidated Statements of OperationsYears ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and January 1, 2003 |  | F-5 
|Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001  |  | F-7 
|Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsYears ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and January 1, 2003 |  | F-9 
|Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                                             |  | F-11

The
following consolidated financial statement schedules of NTL Incorporated (formerly NTL Communications Corp.) and Subsidiaries are included in Item 15(d):

|Schedule ICondensed Financial Information of Registrant |  | F-71
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts            |  | F-77

All
other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are
inapplicable and, therefore have been omitted.

F-1

---



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The
Board of Directors and Shareholders
NTL Incorporated (formerly NTL Communications Corp.)

We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NTL Incorporated (formerly NTL Communications Corp.), and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 (Successor) and 2002
(Predecessor), and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2003 for the Successor and for each of the
two years in the period ended December 31, 2002 for the Predecessor. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(d). These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We
conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In
our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NTL Incorporated (formerly NTL Communications Corp.) and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2003 (Successor) and 2002 (Predecessor), and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2003 for the
Successor and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2002 for the Predecessor, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information
set forth therein.

As
discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 10, 2003 the Company emerged from bankruptcy and applied fresh start accounting. As a
result, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003 and the related statements of consolidated operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2003 are presented on
a different basis than that for the periods before fresh start and, therefore, are not comparable. Additionally, as discussed in Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements, as of
January 1, 2003, the Company began expensing compensation expense related to stock options to conform with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation".As discussed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements, as of January 1, 2002, the
Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets to conform with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets".

Ernst &
Young LLP
London, United Kingdom
March 3, 2004

F-2

---



NTL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except share data)

|                                                                                |                                                                                                  | December 31,
2003    |          | December 31,
2002
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------- | -------- | -----------------
|
|Assets                                                                          |                                                                                                  |                      |          |                  
|Current assets                                                                  |                                                                                                  |                      |          |                  
|                                                                                | Cash and cash equivalents                                                                        |                      | $        | 795.9            
|                                                                                | Marketable securities                                                                            |                      |          |                 
|                                                                                | Accounts receivabletrade, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $28.8 (2003) and $92.7 (2002) |                      |          | 405.3            
|                                                                                | Due from affiliates                                                                              |                      |          |                 
|                                                                                | Prepaid expenses                                                                                 |                      |          | 180.1            
|                                                                                | Other current assets                                                                             |                      |          | 55.8             
|                                                                                |                                                                                                  |                      |          |                  
|                                                                                |                                                                                                  | Total current assets |          |                  
|Fixed assets, net                                                               |                                                                                                  |                      | 7,880.5  |                  
|Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets      |                                                                                                  |                      | 539.1    |                  
|Goodwill                                                                        |                                                                                                  |                      |         |                  
|Intangible assets, net                                                          |                                                                                                  |                      | 1,178.9  |                  
|Investments in and loans to affiliates, net                                     |                                                                                                  |                      | 2.3      |                  
|Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $70.1 (2003) and $184.8 (2002) |                                                                                                  |                      | 134.9    |                  
|                                                                                |                                                                                                  |                      |          |                  
|Total assets                                                                    |                                                                                                  | $                    | 11,172.8 |                  
|                                                                                |                                                                                                  |                      |          |                  

See
accompanying notes.

F-3

---

|                                                     |                                                                                                                                                 | December 31,
2003                    |          | December 31,
2002 |        
|---------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | -------- | ----------------- | -------
|
|Liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit)       |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |          |                   |        
|Current liabilities                                  |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |          |                   |        
|                                                     | Accounts payable                                                                                                                                |                                      | $        | 260.0             |        
|                                                     | Accrued expenses                                                                                                                                |                                      |          | 656.7             |        
|                                                     | Accrued construction costs                                                                                                                      |                                      |          | 33.6              |        
|                                                     | Interest payable                                                                                                                                |                                      |          | 194.6             |        
|                                                     | Deferred revenue                                                                                                                                |                                      |          | 434.8             |        
|                                                     | Other current liabilities                                                                                                                       |                                      |          | 27.1              |        
|                                                     | Current portion of long-term debt                                                                                                               |                                      |          | 2.3               |        
|                                                     |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |          |                   |        
|                                                     |                                                                                                                                                 | Total current liabilities            |          |                   | 1,609.1
|Long-term debt, net of current portion               |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      | 5,728.4  |                   |        
|Other long-term liabilities                          |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      | 137.2    |                   |        
|Deferred income taxes                                |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      | 0.1      |                   |        
|Commitments and contingent liabilities               |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |          |                   |        
|Liabilities subject to compromise                    |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |         |                   |        
|Shareholders' equity (deficit)                       |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |          |                   |        
|                                                     | Series preferred stock$.01 par value; authorized 5,000,000 (2003) and none (2002) shares; issued and outstanding none                          |                                      |          |                  |        
|                                                     | Common stock$.01 par value; authorized 400,000,000 (2003) and 100 (2002) shares; issued and outstanding 86,916,614 (2003) and 13 (2002) shares |                                      |          | 0.9               |        
|                                                     | Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                                      |                                      |          | 4,325.0           |        
|                                                     | Unearned stock-based compensation                                                                                                               |                                      |          | (15.0             | )      
|                                                     | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)                                                                                                   |                                      |          | 341.3             |        
|                                                     | Accumulated (deficit)                                                                                                                           |                                      |          | (954.2            | )      
|                                                     |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |          |                   |        
|                                                     |                                                                                                                                                 | Total shareholders' equity (deficit) |          |                   | 3,698.0
|                                                     |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |          |                   |        
|Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit) |                                                                                                                                                 | $                                    | 11,172.8 |                   | $      
|                                                     |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |          |                   |        

See
accompanying notes.

F-4

---



NTL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in millions, except per share data)

|                                                                           |                                                            | Year ended December 31, |         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | --------
|
|
|Revenue                                                                    |                                                            | $                       | 3,645.2 
|Costs and expenses                                                         |                                                            |                         |         
|                                                                           | Operating costs (excluding depreciation)                   |                         |         
|                                                                           | Selling, general and administrative expenses               |                         |         
|                                                                           | Long-lived asset impairments                               |                         |         
|                                                                           | Non-cash compensation                                      |                         |         
|                                                                           | Other charges                                              |                         |         
|                                                                           | Depreciation                                               |                         |         
|                                                                           | Amortization                                               |                         |         
|                                                                           |                                                            |                         |         
|                                                                           |                                                            |                         | (3,923.4
|                                                                           |                                                            |                         |         
|Operating (loss)                                                           |                                                            |                         | (278.2  
|Other income (expense)                                                     |                                                            |                         |         
|                                                                           | Interest income and other, net                             |                         |         
|                                                                           | Interest expense (contractual interest of $1,425.4 (2002)) |                         |         
|                                                                           | Recapitalization expense                                   |                         |         
|                                                                           | Share of (losses) from equity investments                  |                         |         
|                                                                           | Other gains (losses)                                       |                         |         
|                                                                           | Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)                |                         |         
|                                                                           |                                                            |                         |         
|(Loss) before income taxes                                                 |                                                            |                         | (954.1  
|Income tax (expense) benefit                                               |                                                            |                         | (0.1    
|                                                                           |                                                            |                         |         
|Net (loss)                                                                 |                                                            | $                       | (954.2  
|                                                                           |                                                            |                         |         
|Basic and diluted net loss per common stock(pro forma in 2002 and 2001)   |                                                            | $                       | (15.10  
|                                                                           |                                                            |                         |         
|Weighted average number of shares outstanding(pro forma in 2002 and 2001) |                                                            |                         | 63.2    
|                                                                           |                                                            |                         |         

See
accompanying notes.

F-5

---

|                                                        |  | January 1,
2003 |         
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | --------
|
|Gain on debt discharge                                  |  | $               | 8,451.6 
|Fresh-start adoptionintangible assets                  |  |                 | 1,521.7 
|Fresh-start adoptionlong-term debt                     |  |                 | 221.3   
|Fresh-start adoptiondeferred tax liability             |  |                 | (68.6   
|Fresh-start adoptionaccrued expenses                   |  |                 | (120.4  
|Fresh-start adoptionfixed assets                       |  |                 | (3,194.9
|Recapitalization expense                                |  |                 | (8.0    
|                                                        |  |                 |         
|Net income                                              |  | $               | 6,802.7 
|                                                        |  |                 |         
|Pro forma basic and diluted net income per common share |  | $               | 114.33  
|                                                        |  |                 |         
|Pro forma weighted average shares                       |  |                 | 59.5    
|                                                        |  |                 |         

See
accompanying notes.

F-6

---



NTL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

(dollars in millions)

|                                              |                            | Series
Preferred Stock
$0.01 Par Value |   | Common Stock
$0.01 Par Value |    |            |            |   |    
|--------------------------------------------- | -------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | - | ---------------------------- | -- | ---------- | ---------- | - | ---
|
|
|Predecessor Company                           |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Balance, December 31, 2000                    |                            |                                       |   | $                           |    | 13         |            | $ |   
|Contribution from NTL (Delaware), Inc., net   |                            |                                       |   |                             |    |           |            |   |   
|Non-cash compensation                         |                            |                                       |   |                             |    |           |            |   |   
|Comprehensive loss:                           |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2001 |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Currency translation adjustment               |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Unrealized net losses on derivatives          |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|                                              | Total                      |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|                                              |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Balance, December 31, 2001                    |                            |                                       |   |                             |    | 13         |            |   |   
|Contribution from NTL (Delaware), Inc., net   |                            |                                       |   |                             |    |           |            |   |   
|Comprehensive loss:                           |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002 |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Currency translation adjustment               |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Pension liability adjustment                  |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Unrealized net gains on derivatives           |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|                                              | Total                      |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|                                              |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Balance, December 31, 2002                    |                            |                                       |   |                             |    | 13         |            |   |   
|Comprehensive income:                         |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Net income (loss) January 1, 2003             |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Issuance of common stock                      |                            |                                       |   |                             |    | 50,499,955 |            |   | 0.5
|Fresh-start adoptionother                    |                            |                                       |   |                             |    | (13        | )          |   |   
|                                              |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Reorganized Company                           |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Balance, January 1, 2003                      |                            |                                       |   |                             |    | 50,499,955 |            |   | 0.5
|Issuance of shares into escrow                |                            |                                       |   |                             |    | 133,912    |            |   |   
|Issuance of restricted stock                  |                            |                                       |   |                             |    | 200,000    |            |   |   
|Issuance of shares as payment of bonus        |                            |                                       |   |                             |    | 8,449      |            |   |   
|Exercise of stock options                     |                            |                                       |   |                             |    | 220,833    |            |   |   
|Stock options at fair value                   |                            |                                       |   |                             |    |           |            |   |   
|Escrow shares amortized to operations         |                            |                                       |   |                             |    |           |            |   |   
|Restricted stock amortized to operations      |                            |                                       |   |                             |    |           |            |   |   
|Stock options amortized to operations         |                            |                                       |   |                             |    |           |            |   |   
|Net proceeds from Rights Offering             |                            |                                       |   |                             |    | 35,853,465 |            |   | 0.4
|Comprehensive loss:                           |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2003 |                            |                                       |   |                             |    |           |            |   |   
|Currency translation adjustment               |                            |                                       |   |                             |    |           |            |   |   
|Pension liability adjustment                  |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|                                              | Total                      |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|                                              |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    
|                                              | Balance, December 31, 2003 |                                        |  |                              | $ |            | 86,916,614 |   | $  
|                                              |                            |                                        |   |                              |    |            |            |   |    

See accompanying notes.

F-7

---

|                                              |       |   |           | Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |   |        |  
|--------------------------------------------- | ----- | - | --------- | --------------------------------------------- | - | ------ | -
|
|Predecessor Company                           |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Balance, December 31, 2000                    |       |   |           |                                               | $ | (379.3 | )
|Contribution from NTL (Delaware), Inc., net   |       |   |           |                                               |   |       |  
|Non-cash compensation                         |       |   |           |                                               |   |       |  
|Comprehensive loss:                           |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2001 |       | $ | (11,837.0 | )                                             |   |        |  
|Currency translation adjustment               |       |   | (521.6    | )                                             |   | (521.6 | )
|Unrealized net losses on derivatives          |       |   | (3.6      | )                                             |   |       |  
|                                              |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|                                              | Total |   | $         | (12,362.2                                     | ) |        |  
|                                              |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Balance, December 31, 2001                    |       |   |           |                                               |   | (900.9 | )
|Contribution from NTL (Delaware), Inc., net   |       |   |           |                                               |   |       |  
|Comprehensive loss:                           |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002 |       | $ | (2,375.8  | )                                             |   |       |  
|Currency translation adjustment               |       |   | 351.0     |                                               |   | 351.0  |  
|Pension liability adjustment                  |       |   | (103.7    | )                                             |   |       |  
|Unrealized net gains on derivatives           |       |   | 3.6       |                                               |   |       |  
|                                              |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|                                              | Total |   | $         | (2,124.9                                      | ) |        |  
|                                              |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Balance, December 31, 2002                    |       |   |           |                                               |   | (549.9 | )
|Comprehensive income:                         |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Net income January 1, 2003                    |       | $ | 6,802.7   |                                               |   |       |  
|                                              |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Issuance of common stock                      |       |   |           |                                               |   |       |  
|Fresh-start adoptionother                    |       |   |           |                                               |   | 549.9  |  
|                                              |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Reorganized Company                           |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Balance, January 1, 2003                      |       |   |           |                                               |   |       |  
|Issuance of shares into escrow                |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Issuance of restricted stock                  |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Issuance of shares as payment of bonus        |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Exercise of stock options                     |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Stock options at fair value                   |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Escrow shares amortized to operations         |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Restricted stock amortized to operations      |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Stock options amortized to operations         |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Comprehensive loss:                           |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2003 |       | $ | (954.2    | )                                             |   |        |  
|Currency translation adjustment               |       |   | 342.0     |                                               |   | 342.0  |  
|Pension liability adjustment                  |       |   | (0.7      | )                                             |   |        |  
|                                              |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|                                              | Total |   | $         | (612.9                                        | ) |        |  
|                                              |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  
|Balance, December 31, 2003                    |       |   |           |                                               | $ | 342.0  |  
|                                              |       |   |           |                                               |   |        |  

See accompanying notes.

F-8

---

NTL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions)

|                                                                                                        |                                                                    | Year ended December 31,                 |       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------- | ------
|
|
|Operating activities:                                                                                   |                                                                    |                                         |       
|Net (loss)                                                                                              |                                                                    | $                                       | (954.2
|Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activites:              |                                                                    |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Depreciation and amortization                                      |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Asset impairments                                                  |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Non-cash compensation                                              |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Non-cash restructuring charge                                      |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Equity in losses of unconsolidated subsidiaries                    |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Gain or (loss) on sale of assets                                   |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Provision for losses on accounts receivable                        |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Provision for cancellation of receivables from NTL Europe, Inc.    |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Deferred income taxes                                              |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Amortization of original issue discount and deferred finance costs |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Other                                                              |                                         |       
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect from business acquisitions and dispositions: |                                                                    |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Accounts receivable                                                |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Other current assets                                               |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Prepaid expenses                                                   |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Other assets                                                       |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Accounts payable                                                   |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Other current liabilities                                          |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Accrued expenses and other                                         |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Deferred revenue                                                   |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        |                                                                    |                                         |       
|Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities                                                     |                                                                    |                                         | 521.1 
|                                                                                                        |                                                                    |                                         |       
|Investing activities:                                                                                   |                                                                    |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Acquisition, net of cash required                                  |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Purchase of fixed assets                                           |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Investments in and loans to affiliates                             |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Decrease (increase) in other assets                                |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Loan to NTL Europe, Inc.                                           |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Proceeds from sale of assets                                       |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Purchase of marketable securities                                  |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        | Proceeds from sales of marketable securities                       |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        |                                                                    |                                         |       
|                                                                                                        |                                                                    | Net cash (used in) investing activities |       
|                                                                                                        |                                                                    |                                         |       

See
accompanying notes.

F-9

---

|                                                                       |                                                    | Year ended December 31,                   |      
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- | -----
|
|
|Financing activities:                                                  |                                                    |                                           |      
|                                                                       | Proceeds from borrowings, net of financing costs   |                                           |      
|                                                                       | Net proceeds from rights offering                  |                                           |      
|                                                                       | Proceeds from employee stock options               |                                           |      
|                                                                       | Principal payments on long-term debt               |                                           |      
|                                                                       | Proceeds from borrowings from NTL (Delaware), Inc. |                                           |      
|                                                                       | Distribution to NTL (Delaware), Inc.               |                                           |      
|                                                                       | Contribution from NTL (Delaware), Inc.             |                                           |      
|                                                                       |                                                    |                                           |      
|                                                                       |                                                    | Net cash provided by financing activities |      
|Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents           |                                                    |                                           | 76.8 
|                                                                       |                                                    |                                           |      
|Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                       |                                                    |                                           | 155.2
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year                         |                                                    |                                           | 640.7
|                                                                       |                                                    |                                           |      
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of year                               |                                                    | $                                         | 795.9
|                                                                       |                                                    |                                           |      
|Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information                       |                                                    |                                           |      
|Cash paid during the year for interest exlusive of amounts capitalized |                                                    | $                                         | 583.4
|Income taxes paid                                                      |                                                    |                                           |     
|Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities                 |                                                    |                                           |      
|Contribution from NTL (Delaware), Inc.                                 |                                                    | $                                         |     
|Conversion of notes, net of unamorized deferred financing costs        |                                                    |                                           |     

|                                               |                                                  | January 1,
2003                           |      
|---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------- | -----
|
|Net cash (used in) operating activities        |                                                  | $                                         | (46.9
|                                               |                                                  |                                           |      
|Investing activities                           |                                                  |                                           |      
|                                               | Decrease in other assets                         |                                           |      
|                                               |                                                  |                                           |      
|                                               |                                                  | Net cash provided by investing activities |      
|Financing activities                           |                                                  |                                           |      
|                                               | Proceeds from borrowings, net of financing costs |                                           |      
|                                               | Principal payments                               |                                           |      
|                                               |                                                  |                                           |      
|                                               |                                                  | Net cash provided by financing activities |      
|                                               |                                                  |                                           |      
|Increase in cash and cash equivalents          |                                                  |                                           | 138.7
|Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |                                                  |                                           | 502.0
|                                               |                                                  |                                           |      
|Cash and cash equivalents, end of period       |                                                  | $                                         | 640.7
|                                               |                                                  |                                           |      

See accompanying notes.

F-10

---



NTL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.     Organization and Business

NTL's Completed Restructuring

On May 8, 2002, NTL Incorporated (formerly known as NTL Communications Corp.), (the "Company") NTL Europe, Inc. (formerly NTL Incorporated) and
certain of the Company's and NTL Europe, Inc.'s subsidiaries filed a pre-arranged joint reorganization plan (the "Plan") under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. The Company's
operating subsidiaries and those of NTL Europe, Inc. were not included in the Chapter 11 filing. The Plan became effective on January 10, 2003, (the "Effective Date") at which time the
Company emerged from Chapter 11 reorganization.

Pursuant
to the Plan, the entity formerly known as NTL Incorporated and its subsidiaries and affiliates were split into two separate groups, with the Company and NTL Europe, Inc.
each emerging as independent public companies. The entity formerly known as NTL Communications Corp. was renamed "NTL Incorporated" and became the holding company for the former NTL group's principal
UK and Ireland assets. Prior to consummation of the Plan, the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the entity then known as NTL Incorporated, which, pursuant to the Plan, was renamed "NTL
Europe, Inc." and which became the holding company for the former NTL group's continental European and certain other assets. Pursuant to the Plan, all of the outstanding securities of the
Company's former ultimate parent company (NTL Europe, Inc.) and certain of its subsidiaries, including the Company, were cancelled, and the Company issued shares of its common stock and
Series A warrants and NTL Europe, Inc. issued shares of its common stock and preferred stock to various former creditors and stockholders of the Company's former ultimate parent company
and its subsidiaries, including the Company. The precise mix of new securities received by holders of each particular type of security of
the Company's former ultimate parent company and its subsidiaries was set forth in the Plan. The outstanding notes of Diamond Holdings Limited and NTL (Triangle) LLC were not cancelled and remain
outstanding.

Historical Structure of the Company

The Company was incorporated in 1993 as a Delaware corporation and continued as a publicly-traded holding company until February 1999. From
February 1999 until the Effective Date, the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of NTL (Delaware), Inc., a Delaware corporation, which was incorporated in February 1999, to
effect a reorganization into a holding company structure under Section 251(g) of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The holding company structure was implemented to pursue opportunities
outside of the UK and Ireland, and was accomplished through a merger. The Company's stockholders at the time became stockholders of the new holding company NTL (Delaware), Inc., and the Company
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the new holding company. The new holding company took the name NTL Incorporated until May 2000 when it was changed to NTL (Delaware), Inc., its
current name.

In
May 2000 another new holding company structure was implemented in connection with the acquisition of the residential assets of Cable & Wireless Communications plc
("CWC") (the operations acquired from CWC are called "ConsumerCo"), and was similarly accomplished through a merger. The stockholders of NTL (Delaware), Inc. became stockholders of the new
holding company, and NTL (Delaware), Inc. became a subsidiary of the new holding company, and the Company remained a subsidiary of NTL (Delaware), Inc. ("NTL Delaware"). The new holding
company then took the name NTL Incorporated until the Effective Date of the Plan (January 10, 2003), at which time its name was changed to NTL Europe, Inc. ("NTL Europe"). The Company
remained a subsidiary of those two

F-11

---

holding
companies until the Effective Date, at which time NTL Europe and its wholly owned subsidiary NTL Delaware were separated from the Company pursuant to the Plan.

On
February 21, 2001, the Company's former ultimate parent company contributed the assets of ConsumerCo to the Company and NTL Delaware contributed the assets of NTL Business
Limited (formerly Workplace Technologies plc) ("NTL Business") to the Company. NTL Group Limited, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company, which was acquired in 1996, has a
30-year history in the UK as a provider of reliable communications services.

The
Company conducts its operations through direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Business

The Company, through its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, owns and operates broadband communications networks for telephone, cable television and
Internet services in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, and transmission networks for television and radio broadcasting in the United Kingdom. The Company provides services to its
customers through five reportable segments.



The
Company's reportable segments are supported by various central shared services, including ntl: networks, which manages the Company's UK national network. Other shared services
include finance, information technology or IT, and human resources. ntl: Ireland relies upon these central shared services to a lesser extent than the Company's other reportable segments.

The
following customers provide a significant portion of the Company's revenues:



F-12

---



Except
for the ntl: broadcast and ntl: carriers reportable segments, the Company does not believe that the loss of any one customer would have a materially adverse effect on its results
of operations. In the case of each of ntl: broadcast and ntl: carriers reportable segments, the loss of the customer identified above for that segment would have a materially adverse effect on that
segment.

2.     Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The
Company operated its business as a debtor-in-possession subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court during the period from May 8, 2002 until
January 10, 2003. Accordingly, the Company's consolidated financial statements for periods prior to its emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization were prepared in accordance with the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 90-7,"Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy
Code"("SOP 90-7"). In addition, the Company adopted fresh-start reporting upon its emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization in accordance with SOP
90-7. For financial reporting purposes, the effects of the consummation of the Plan as well as adjustments for fresh-start reporting have been recorded in the accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements as of January 1, 2003.

Pursuant
to fresh-start reporting, a new entity was deemed created for financial reporting purposes and the carrying values of assets and liabilities were adjusted. The carrying values
of assets were adjusted to their reorganization values that are equivalent to their estimated fair values. The carrying values of liabilities were adjusted to their present values. Since fresh-start
reporting materially changed the carrying values recorded in the Company's consolidated balance sheet, a black line separates the financial statements for periods after the adoption of fresh-start
reporting from the financial statements for periods prior to the adoption.

The
term "Predecessor Company" refers to the Company and its subsidiaries for periods prior to and including December 31, 2002. The term "Reorganized Company" refers to the
Company and its subsidiaries for periods subsequent to January 1, 2003. The effects of the consummation of the Plan as well as adjustments for fresh-start reporting recorded as of
January 1, 2003 are Predecessor Company transactions and are presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and cash flows dated January 1, 2003. All other results
of operations and cash flows on January 1, 2003 are Reorganized Company transactions.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and assumptions impact, among others, the following: the amount of uncollectible
accounts and notes receivable, the amount to be paid to terminate certain agreements included in restructuring costs, the amount to be paid for other liabilities, the Company's pension expense and
pension funding requirements, estimated costs for interconnection, estimates related to the amount of costs to be capitalized in connection with the

F-13

---

construction
and installation of the Company's network and facilities and estimates related to the value of investments, long-lived assets and goodwill. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and entities where the Company's interest is greater than
50%. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currencies of the Company's principal operating subsidiaries are the UK Pound Sterling and the Euro, while its reporting currency is the United
States Dollar. The assets and liabilities of the Company's UK and Ireland subsidiaries have been translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates, and revenues and expenses are
translated at the average rates for the respective years. Exchange gains and losses on translation of the Company's net equity investments in the subsidiaries are reported as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the statement of shareholders' equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recorded in the statements of operations.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents were none and
$15.7 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, which consisted primarily of bank time deposits and corporate commercial paper. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, none of
the cash equivalents were denominated in foreign currencies.

Trade receivables

The Company's trade receivables are stated at outstanding principal balance, net of allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
$28.8 million at December 31, 2003.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company's financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables. The Company's
cash equivalents are in high quality securities placed with major banks and financial institutions. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because of the large
number of customers and their dispersion across geographic areas. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and generally does not require collateral. At
December 31, 2003, the Company did not have significant credit risk concentrations. No single group or customer represents greater than 10% of total accounts receivable.

F-14

---

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets, net totaled $7,880.5 million and $11,088.9 million, representing 70.5% and 85.0% of total assets at December 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Fixed assets, net at December 31, 2002 are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. In accordance with SOP 90-7, upon emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization,
the Company adopted fresh-start reporting as of January 1, 2003. Pursuant to fresh-start reporting, the carrying values of fixed assets were adjusted to their reorganization values, which were
equivalent to their estimated fair values. These adjusted carrying values became the revised cost basis of the Company's fixed assets at January 1, 2003. Fixed assets, net were written down by
$3,194.9 million to reflect this adjustment. Fixed assets acquired since January 1, 2003, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.

The
cost of fixed assets includes amounts capitalized for labor and overhead expended in connection with the design and installation of the Company's operating network equipment and
facilities. Costs associated with initial customer installations, additions of network equipment necessary to enable enhanced services, acquisition of additional fixed assets and replacement of
existing fixed assets are capitalized. The costs of reconnecting the same service to a previously installed premise are charged to expense in the period incurred. Costs for repairs and maintenance are
charged to expense as incurred.

Labor
and overhead costs directly related to the construction and installation of fixed assets, including payroll and related costs of some employees and related rent and other occupancy
costs, are capitalized. The payroll and related costs of some employees that are directly related to construction and installation activities are capitalized based on specific time devoted to these
activities where identifiable. In cases where the time devoted to these activities is not specifically identifiable, the Company capitalizes costs based upon estimated allocations. The Company
continues to enhance its processes to reduce reliance upon these estimates in determining amounts capitalized. The labor and overhead costs capitalized in the years ended December 31, 2003,
2002 and 2001 were approximately $124.4 million, $185.1 million and $365.1 million, respectively.

The
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued an Exposure Draft of a Proposed Statement of Position on Accounting for Certain Costs and Activities related to
Property, Plant and Equipment dated June 29, 2001. This Exposure Draft has not yet been adopted. However, if this Exposure Draft were adopted, it would require among other things that rent and
other occupancy costs be charged to expense as incurred. In the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 the Company capitalized approximately $10.6 million and $14.5 million,
respectively, of rent and other occupancy costs.

F-15

---

The
following table illustrates the calculation of labor and overhead costs capitalized as a percentage of total operating costs and selling, general and administrative expenses and as a
percentage of cash used to purchase fixed assets.

|                                                                                                                               |  | Year ended December 31,
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|
|
|
|Labor and overhead costs capitalized                                                                                           |  | $124.4                 
|Total operating costs and selling, general and administrative expenses                                                         |  | 2,446.1                
|Labor and overhead costs capitalized as a percentage of total operating costs and selling, general and administrative expenses |  | 5.1%                   
|Purchase of fixed assets                                                                                                       |  | 574.2                  
|Labor and overhead costs capitalized as a percentage of purchase of fixed assets                                               |  | 21.7%                  

Depreciation
is computed by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives are as follows: operating equipment5
to 30 years and other equipment5 to 30 years.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets include goodwill, license acquisition costs, and customer lists. Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets
acquired in business combinations accounted for as purchases which includes the portion of the purchase price allocated to the value of the workforce in place. License acquisition costs represent the
portion of purchase price allocated to the cable television and telecommunications licenses acquired in business combinations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,"goodwill was amortized on a straight-line basis over the periods benefited of 3, 10, 15 or
30 years and license acquisition costs were amortized on a straight-line basis up to 23 years. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142, goodwill and license acquisition
costs are no longer amortized. Instead these assets are reviewed annually (or more frequently under certain conditions) for impairment in accordance with this statement. Customer lists represent the
portion of the purchase price allocated to the value of the customer base. Customer lists are amortized on a straight-line basis over 3 or 5 years.

In
addition, the Company's total reorganization value exceeded the amounts allocable to identifiable assets resulting in a new indefinite-lived intangible asset that is not amortized but
is reviewed annually (or more frequently under certain conditions) for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142.

Upon
the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company performed an analysis of its intangible assets acquired before July 1, 2001 to determine whether they should be classified
and accounted for as part of or separate from goodwill. The Company reclassified the carrying value of workforce in place included in other intangibles to goodwill. The Company determined that license
acquisition costs would no longer be subject to amortization since they are deemed to have an indefinite useful life. The

F-16

---

Company
also determined that no changes in the remaining useful lives of the customer lists were required.

The
Company also performed an evaluation for impairment of its goodwill and license acquisition costs as of January 1, 2002 and determined that no impairment charge was required.

The
following table shows the Company's net (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2001 as adjusted for the adoption of SFAS No. 142, had SFAS No. 142 been in effect
on January 1, 2001 (in millions).

|                       |                           | Year ended
December 31,
2001 |          
|---------------------- | ------------------------- | ---------------------------- | ---------
|
|Net (loss)as reported |                           | $                            | (11,837.0
|Amortization of:       |                           |                              |          
|                       | Goodwill                  |                              |          
|                       | License acquisition costs |                              |          
|                       | Other                     |                              |          
|                       |                           |                              |          
|                       |                           |                              | 1,104.9  
|                       |                           |                              |          
|Net (loss)as adjusted |                           | $                            | (10,732.1
|                       |                           |                              |          

Asset Retirement Obligations

As of January 1, 2003, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143,Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations("SFAS 143"). SFAS 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible
long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs. The adoption of SFAS 143 did not result in any recognition of liabilities during its fiscal year ended December 31,
2003.

The
Company accrues for the liability in respect of dilapidations on its leasehold properties over the term of the lease in accordance with SFAS 13 Accounting for Leases.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, including fixed assets and amortizable definite lived intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, by first grouping its
long-lived assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities (the
asset group) and, secondly, estimating the undiscounted future cash flows that are directly associated with and expected to arise from the use of and eventual disposition of such asset group. The
Company estimates the undiscounted cash flows over the remaining useful life of the primary asset within the asset group. If the carrying value of the asset group exceeds the estimated undiscounted
cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge to the extent the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. The Company determines fair value through quoted
market prices in active

F-17

---

markets
or, if quoted market prices are unavailable, through the performance of internal analysis of discounted cash flows or external appraisals. The undiscounted and discounted cash flow analyses
are based on a number of estimates and assumptions, including the expected period over which the asset will be utilized, projected future operating results of the asset group, discount rate and
long-term growth rate.

Reorganization
value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets, goodwill, license acquisition costs and other intangible assets that are not amortized are reviewed for
impairment each year.

As
of December 31, 2003, the Company reviewed its long-lived assets for impairment. The Company engaged an independent financial adviser to assist in the impairment
review. The Company and the independent financial adviser determined that there was no impairment of the Company's long-lived assets as of December 31, 2003. This determination was
based upon various valuation methods, including discounted cash flow analysis, selected comparable market multiples of publicly traded companies and other applicable ratios and economic information
relevant to the operations of the Company. Certain factors that were incorporated into the impairment review included the following:



Equity Method Investments

All investments in which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee, but less than a controlling voting interest, are
accounted for using the equity method. Equity method investments are recorded at original cost and adjusted periodically to recognize the Company's proportionate share of the investees' net income or
losses after the date of investment, additional contributions made and dividends received. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the difference between the Company's recorded investment and
its proportionate interest in the book value of the investees' net assets were being amortized on a straight-line basis over 10 years. The Company evaluates the carrying value of
its equity method investments and tests for impairment in accordance with Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 18.

Variable Interest Entities

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46,"Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities,"(FIN 46) and in December 2003 the FASB issued a revised FIN 46, which addresses when a company should include in its financial statements the assets,
liabilities and activities of another entity. FIN 46 requires consolidation of a variable interest entity (VIE) if the reporting entity is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the
VIE's activities or entitled to receive a majority of the VIE's residual returns or both.

F-18

---



The consolidation requirements of FIN 46 apply immediately to VIEs created after January 31, 2003, and to all other existing structures commonly
referred to as special-purpose entities. The consolidation requirements will apply to VIEs created prior to January 31, 2003, other than special-purpose entities, in the
first quarter of 2004. The adoption of FIN 46 did not have, and the application of the revised FIN 46 is not expected to have, a significant impact on earnings or financial position.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs of $134.9 million and $214.9 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, are included in other assets.
Deferred financing costs are incurred in connection with the issuance of debt and are amortized over the term of the related debt using a straight-line basis, since this method is
materially consistent with the effective interest basis.

Capitalized Interest

Interest is capitalized as a component of the cost of fixed assets constructed. In 2003, 2002 and 2001, total interest incurred was $751.9 million,
$826.5 million and $1,308.5 million, respectively, of which interest of $5.5 million, $46.3 million and $67.7 million, respectively, was capitalized.

Restructuring Costs

As of January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS 146 "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities" and recognizes a liability for costs associated with restructuring activities when the
liability is incurred. The adoption of SFAS 146 did not have a significant effect on the results of operations, financial condition or cash flows of the Company.

Prior
to 2003, the Company recognized a liability for costs associated with restructuring activities at the time of a commitment to restructure was given in accordance with EITF
94-3 "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a
restructuring)".

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue only when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following are present:



Revenues
are invoiced and recorded as part of a periodic billing cycle, and are recognized as the services are provided. At the end of each period, adjustments are recorded to defer
revenue relating to services billed in advance and to accrue for earned but unbilled services.



F-19

---



Advertising Expense

The Company charges the cost of advertising to expense as incurred. Advertising costs were $61.5 million, $33.5 million and $77.9 million in
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has one stock-based employee compensation plan, described more fully in Note 11. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair
value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation(SFAS 123). Under the prospective method
of adoption selected by the Company under provision of FASB Statement No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure(SFAS 148), the recognition provisions will be applied to all employee awards granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2003.

Prior
to 2003, the Company's employees participated in the various stock option plans of its former ultimate parent company. The Company accounted for the stock-based compensation plans
of its former ultimate parent company under APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees(APB 25), and related
interpretations. All options to purchase shares of the Company's former ultimate parent company's common stock were cancelled on the Effective Date pursuant to the Plan.

F-20

---

If
the Company had elected to adopt the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 as of January 1, 2001, pro forma net income and diluted net income per share would be
as follows (in millions, except per share data):

|                                                                                                                                                |  | For the Year ended December 31, |       
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ------
|
|
|Net (loss), as reported                                                                                                                         |  | $                               | (954.2
|Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects                                      |  |                                 |      
|Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |  |                                 |      
|                                                                                                                                                |  |                                 |       
|Pro forma net (loss)                                                                                                                            |  | $                               | (954.2
|                                                                                                                                                |  |                                 |       
|Earnings per share:                                                                                                                             |  |                                 |       
|Basic and diluted net (loss) per common share (pro forma in 2002 and 2001)                                                                      |  | $                               | (15.10
|                                                                                                                                                |  |                                 |       
|Basic and diluted net (loss) per common share, pro forma                                                                                        |  | $                               | (15.10
|                                                                                                                                                |  |                                 |       

In
July 2001, the Compensation and Option Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company's former ultimate parent company approved modifications to certain stock options. The
latest possible expiration date of options to purchase an aggregate of approximately 4.7 million shares of NTL Europe, Inc.'s common stock with exercise prices from $0.17 to $14.76 per
share was extended from July 30, 2001 to October 2004, as applicable, to January 30, 2006. The Company recognized non-cash compensation expense of $30.6 million
based on the excess of the quoted market price of NTL Europe, Inc.'s common stock on the date of the modification of $12.05 per share over the exercise price per share. All options to purchase
shares of the Company's former ultimate parent company's common stock were cancelled on the Effective Date pursuant to the Plan.

Pursuant
to the Company's 2003 Bonus Scheme, participants are eligible to receive a bonus payment equal to a percentage of their base salary as determined by their level of employment
based upon the attainment of performance targets. Bonus payments are made in two installments. Half of the bonus owing to various participants may be paid in shares of the Company's common stock. In
August 2003, 8,449 shares of the Company's common stock were issued in accordance with the 2003 Bonus Scheme.

Pensions

The Company accounts for its defined benefit pension plans using Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, SFAS No. 87, Employers' Accounting for
Pensionsand the disclosure rules under SFAS 132 (Revised)Employers Disclosures about Pensions
and Other Postretirement Benefits, an Amendment of FASB Statements Nos. 87, 88 and 106. Under SFAS 87, pension expense is recognized on an accrual basis over employees'
approximate service periods. Pension expense calculated under SFAS 87 is generally independent of funding decisions or requirements. The Company recognized expense for

F-21

---

its
defined benefit pension plans of $15.4 million and $10.4 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company expects its pension expense to be approximately $11.9 million in
2004.

The
fair value of the Company's pension plans' assets increased from $234.1 million at December 31, 2002 to $301.9 million at December 31, 2003. The Company
contributed $8.7 million in cash to its defined benefit pension plans in 2003.

The
calculation of pension expense and the Company's pension liability requires the use of a number of assumptions. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and
liability amounts, and future actual experience can differ from the assumptions. The Company believes that the two most critical assumptions are the expected long-term rate of return on
plan assets and the assumed discount rate.

When
calculating pension expense for 2003, the Company assumed that its plans' assets would generate a long-term rate of return of between 6.6% and 7.9%. This range is lower
than the assumed rates of between 7.0% and 7.9% used to calculate the 2002 expense. The Company determines its expected long-term rate of return assumption based on historical experience
and by evaluating input from the trustee managing the plan assets, including the trustee's review of asset class return expectations by several consultants and economists as well as
long-term inflation assumptions. The Company's expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on a target allocation of assets, which is based on our goal of earning
the highest rate of return while maintaining risk at acceptable levels. The plan strives to have assets
sufficiently diversified so that adverse or unexpected results from one security class will not have an unduly detrimental impact on the entire portfolio.

The
Company discounted its future pension obligations using rates of 5.5% and 6.0% at December 31, 2003 and rates of between 5.9% and 6.0% for 2002. The Company determined the
appropriate discount rate based on the current rates earned on long-term bonds that receive one of the two highest ratings given by a recognized rating agency. The pension liability and
future pension expense both increase as the discount rate is reduced. Lowering the discount rate by 0.5% would increase the Company's pension liability at December 31, 2003 by approximately
$16.4 million and increase its estimated 2004 pension expense by approximately $3.6 million.

At
December 31, 2003, the Company has unrecognized actuarial losses of $5.6 million. These losses will be recognized as a component of pension expense in future years. The
Company's estimated 2004 pension expense of $11.9 million includes the recognition of approximately $0.1 million of these losses.

Future
changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the participants in the Company's pension plans will impact its future pension expense
and liabilities. The Company cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.

At
December 31, 2003, projected benefit obligations of all of the Company's pension plans exceed plan assets by $156.9 million. The Company will need to fund these deficits
in accordance with the laws and regulations in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. The Company expects to contribute a total of approximately £14.9 million
($26.6 million) during 2004, of which £13.0 million ($23.2 million) relates to the largest of the Company's defined benefit pension plans.

In
2003, the Company received an actuarial valuation as of December 31, 2002, of the largest of the Company's defined benefit pension plans, which represented approximately 82.9%
of total plan

F-22

---

assets
and 83.3% of total projected benefit obligations at December 31, 2003. Based upon this actuarial valuation of the assets as of the valuation date of December 31, 2002, this plan
has a projected benefit obligation exceeding the fair value of plan assets by approximately £82.3 million, or $146.8 million. The Company will need to fund this deficit in
accordance with the laws and regulations of the United Kingdom. The Company will need to contribute approximately £13.0 million ($23.2 million) in cash payments annually
beginning January 1, 2004, and must increase this contribution by 4% for each succeeding year for a period of eleven and one half years in order to eliminate the current deficit. The actuarial
valuation of the Company's pension plans requires the use of assumptions and estimates. These assumptions may differ from those used in calculating the amounts required to be disclosed in accordance
with SFAS 132. Changes in these assumptions and estimates as well as future investment returns could potentially have a material impact, either upwards or downwards, on the estimated funding
requirement

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company has used financial instruments to hedge a portion, but not all, of its exposure from floating interest rate debt and from movements in foreign
exchange rates. Gains and losses on these instruments were deferred and recognized in the statement of operations when the related hedged transactions were recognized. To date, premiums paid for these
contracts have not been material. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

The
Company sometimes uses UK pound forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk. A forward foreign exchange contract obligates the Company to
exchange predetermined amounts of specified foreign currencies at specified exchange rates on specified dates or to make an equivalent U.S. dollar payment equal to the value of such exchange. The
Company does not apply hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133 (as amended) for these contracts. Any changes in fair value are recorded in results of operations.

Net loss per share

Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year ended
December 31, 2003, as adjusted for the effect of the rights offering. Options to purchase 3.2 million shares and 0.1 million shares of common stock in escrow at
December 31, 2003 are excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share, since the Company is loss making and the inclusion of such options and shares is antidilutive.

Pro
forma basic and diluted net loss per share for periods prior to January 1, 2003 is computed assuming the following shares were outstanding for these years: 50.0 million
shares issued in connection with the reorganization plan, 0.5 million shares issued in connection with the issuance of the Exit Notes and 9.0 million shares as an adjustment to give
effect to the impact of rights offering.

3.     Reorganization and Emergence from Chapter 11

Background of Restructuring

Both the equity and debt capital markets experienced periods of significant volatility in 2001 and 2002, particularly for securities issued by telecommunications
and technology companies. As a result, the ability of the Company's former ultimate parent company and its subsidiaries to access those

F-23

---

markets
as well as its ability to obtain financing from its bank lenders and equipment suppliers became severely restricted. In addition, the Company's former ultimate parent company and its
subsidiaries, including the Company, had no further funds available, or were unable to draw upon funds, under the Company's credit facilities. As a result of these factors, together with its
substantial leverage, on January 31, 2002, the Company's former ultimate parent company announced that it had appointed professional advisors to advise on strategic and recapitalization
alternatives to strengthen its balance sheet, reduce debt and put an appropriate capital structure in place for its business.

Promptly
upon obtaining the requisite waivers from the lenders under its credit facilities in March 2002, the Company's former ultimate parent company and certain of its
subsidiaries commenced negotiations with a steering committee of the unofficial committee of its bondholders and the committee's legal and financial advisors.

The
Company's former ultimate parent company and its subsidiaries failed to make interest payments on some of the outstanding notes starting on April 1, 2002. The Company's former
ultimate parent company also failed to declare or pay dividends on certain series of its outstanding preferred stock owing to a lack of available surplus under Delaware law.

On
April 16, 2002, the Company's former ultimate parent company announced that it and an unofficial committee of its bondholders had reached an agreement in principle on a
comprehensive recapitalization of the former NTL group. To implement the proposed recapitalization plan, on May 8, 2002, the Company, the Company's former ultimate parent company and certain of
the other subsidiaries of the Company's former ultimate parent company filed cases and a pre-arranged joint reorganization plan under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In connection
with the filing, some members of the unofficial creditors' committee of bondholders entered into a credit facility agreement (the "DIP facility") committing to provide a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company with up to $500.0 million in new debt financing. NTL Delaware committed to provide up to an additional $130.0 million under the DIP facility.

As
a result of the payment defaults as well as the voluntary filing under Chapter 11 by the Company's former ultimate parent company and certain of its subsidiaries on May 8,
2002, there was an event of default under all of the Company's former ultimate parent company and its subsidiaries' credit facilities and the indentures governing all of their publicly traded debt,
other than debt of NTL (Triangle) LLC.

The
Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Plan on September 5, 2002. During the fall of 2002, the Company's former ultimate parent company negotiated with a group of lenders to enter
into a new financing arrangement to repay the DIP facility, to repay certain obligations and to provide liquidity to the Company and its subsidiaries. The Plan became effective on January 10,
2003 (the "Effective Date"), at which time the Company emerged from Chapter 11 reorganization. In connection with the Company's emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries issued $558.249 million aggregate principal face amount of 19% Senior Secured Notes due 2010 (the "Exit Notes") on January 10, 2003. Initial purchasers of the Company's Exit
Notes also purchased 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock on that date. The gross proceeds from the sale of the Exit Notes and such shares totaled $500.0 million. The proceeds were used
in part to repay amounts outstanding under the DIP facility and to purchase from NTL Delaware a £90.0 million note of the Company's subsidiary, NTL (UK) Group Inc., and to
repay certain other obligations. Also on

F-24

---

January 10,
2003, the Company and its lending banks amended the Company's existing credit facilities. The Exit Notes were repaid on November 17, 2003 following the Company's rights
offering.

In
connection with the Company's Chapter 11 reorganization, UBS Securities LLC provided advisory services to the Company for which they received customary fees, including an amount of up
to $4 million payable in April 2004 in shares of the Company's common stock. The shares will be issued if the value of the shares received by the Company's former debt holders in the
Chapter 11 reorganization exceeds specified levels. The shares will be valued for these purposes based upon the market price of the shares over the 60-day trading period commencing
January 10, 2004.

Reorganization Value

The Company adopted fresh-start reporting upon its emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization in accordance with SOP 90-7. The Company engaged an
independent financial advisor to assist in the determination of its reorganization value as defined in SOP 90-7. The Company and its independent financial advisor determined the Company's
reorganization value was $11,247.5 million. This determination was based upon various valuation methods, including discounted projected cash flow analysis, selected comparable market multiples
of publicly traded companies and other applicable ratios and economic information relevant to the operations of the Company. Certain factors that were incorporated into the determination of the
Company's reorganization value included the following:



The
cash flow projections were based on economic, competitive and general business conditions prevailing when the projections were prepared. They were also based on a variety of
estimates and assumptions which, though considered reasonable by management, may not be realized, and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and
contingencies, many of which are beyond the Company's control. A change in the estimates and assumptions about revenue, operating cash flow, tax rates and capital expenditures may have had a
significant effect on the determination of the Company's reorganization value.

The
Company determined that its reorganization value computed as of the Effective Date, consisted of the following (in millions):

|Present value of discounted cash flows of the emerging entity |  | $ | 9,811.0 
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | --------
|Current assets                                                |  |   | 1,237.0 
|Other assets                                                  |  |   | 199.5   
|                                                              |  |  
|Reorganization value                                          |  | $ | 11,247.5
|                                                              |  |  

The
Company adopted fresh-start reporting because the holders of its voting common shares immediately before filing and confirmation of the Plan received less than 50% of the voting
shares of

F-25

---

the
emerging company, and because the Company's reorganization value is less than its post-petition liabilities and allowed claims, as shown below (in millions):

|                           |                                   |   |          
|-------------------------- | --------------------------------- | - | ---------
|Allowed claims:            |                                   |   |          
|                           | Liabilities subject to compromise |   | $        
|Post petition liabilities: |                                   |   |          
|                           | Current liabilities               |   |          
|                           | Deferred income taxes             |   |          
|                           |                                   |   |          
|                           |                                   |   | 18,217.5 
|Reorganization value       |                                   |   | (11,247.5
|                           |                                   |   |          
|                           |                                   | $ | 6,970.0  
|                           |                                   |   |          

Gain on Debt Discharge

The Company realized a gain of $8,451.6 million in connection with the recapitalization of its debt in accordance with the Plan. This gain has been
reflected in the results of operations of the Predecessor Company on January 1, 2003. A summary of the gain on debt discharge follows (in millions):

|Liabilities subject to compromise:          |                                                   |   |          |        
|------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | - | -------- | -------
|                                            | Pre-petition long-term debt subject to compromise |   | $        | 9,814.2
|                                            | Accounts payable and accrued expenses             |   |          | 1.6    
|                                            | Interest payable                                  |   |          | 316.8  
|                                            | Due to NTL Europe, Inc.                           |   |          | 25.2   
|                                            |                                                   |   |         
|                                            |                                                   |   | 10,157.8 |        
|                                            | Unamortized deferred financing costs              |   |          | (127.9 
|                                            |                                                   |   |         
|                                            |                                                   |   | 10,029.9 |        
|Claims assumed and consideration exchanged: |                                                   |   |          |        
|                                            | Diamond Holdings' notes assumed                   |   |          | 327.3  
|                                            | Interest payable assumed                          |   |          | 38.0   
|                                            | Accounts payable and accrued expenses assumed     |   |          | 1.6    
|                                            | Due to NTL Europe, Inc. assumed                   |   |          | 25.2   
|                                            | Value of Reorganized Company's common stock       |   |          | 1,186.2
|                                            |                                                   |   |         
|                                            |                                                   |   | 1,578.3  |        
|                                            |                                                   |   |         
|                                            |                                                   | $ | 8,451.6  |        
|                                            |                                                   |   |         

F-26

---



Recapitalization Expense

The joint reorganization plan provided that recapitalization costs be allocated between the Company and NTL Europe. Recapitalization expense consist of the
following (in millions):

|                    |  | Year Ended December 31,
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|
|
|Payroll and related |  | $                      
|Professional fees   |  |                        
|                    |  |                        
|                    |  | $                      
|                    |  |                        

|                    |  | January 1, 2003 |     
|------------------- |  | --------------- | ----
|
|Payroll and related |  | $               |    
|Professional fees   |  |                 | (8.0
|                    |  |                 |     
|                    |  | $               | (8.0
|                    |  |                 |     

Details
of operating cash receipts and payments resulting from the recapitalization are as follows (in millions):

|                                                       |  | Year Ended December 31,
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|
|
|Payroll and related costs paid                         |  | $                      
|Professional fees                                      |  |                        
|                                                       |  |                        
|Net operating cash flows from recapitalization expense |  | $                      
|                                                       |  |                        

|                                                       |  | January 1, 2003 |     
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------- | ----
|
|Payroll and related costs paid                         |  | $               |    
|Professional fees                                      |  |                 | (8.0
|                                                       |  |                 |     
|Net operating cash flows from recapitalization expense |  | $               | (8.0
|                                                       |  |                 |     

Fresh-start reporting

In accordance with SOP 90-7, the Company adopted the provisions of fresh-start reporting as of January 1, 2003. The following reconciliation of
the Predecessor Company's consolidated balance sheet

F-27

---

as
of December 31, 2002 to that of the Reorganized Company as of January 1, 2003 gives effect to the emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization and the adoption of fresh-start reporting.

The
Company engaged an independent financial advisor to assist in the determination of the reorganization value (or fair value) of its assets and the present value of its liabilities.
This determination resulted in the fresh-start reporting adjustments to write-down fixed assets and write-up intangible assets to their fair values. In addition, the Company's
total
reorganization value exceeded the amounts allocable to identifiable assets that resulted in a new indefinite-lived intangible asset.

The
adjustments titled "Emergence from Chapter 11" reflect the consummation of the Plan, including the cancellation of a substantial portion of the Company's outstanding debt and the
issuance of shares of new common stock and Series A warrants to various former creditors and stockholders of

F-28

---

the
Company's former ultimate parent company and certain of its subsidiaries, including the Company. The adjustments titled "Fresh-Start" reflect the adoption of fresh-start reporting.

|                                                                           |                                                                 | December 31, 2002         |          |           |         |           |          | January 1, 2003 |         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | -------- | --------- | ------- | --------- | -------- | --------------- | --------
|
|
|Assets                                                                     |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|Current assets:                                                            |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|                                                                           | Cash and cash equivalents                                       |                           | $        | 502.0     |         | $         | 138.7    |                 | $       
|                                                                           | Marketable securities                                           |                           |          | 5.2       |         |           |         |                 |         
|                                                                           | Accounts receivabletrade, less allowance for doubtful accounts |                           |          | 395.9     |         |           |         |                 |         
|                                                                           | Due from affiliates                                             |                           |          | 1.6       |         |           |         |                 |         
|                                                                           | Prepaid expenses                                                |                           |          | 170.0     |         |           |         |                 |         
|                                                                           | Other current assets                                            |                           |          | 96.0      |         |           | (72.4    | )               |         
|                                                                           |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|                                                                           |                                                                 | Total current assets      |          |           | 1,170.7 |           |          | 66.3            |         
|Fixed assets, net                                                          |                                                                 |                           | 11,088.9 |           |         |          |          |                 | (3,194.9
|Intangible assets, net                                                     |                                                                 |                           | 395.3    |           |         |          |          |                 | 868.4   
|Investments in and loans to affiliates, net                                |                                                                 |                           | 8.4      |           |         |          |          |                 |        
|Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets |                                                                 |                           |         |           |         |          |          |                 | 653.3   
|Other assets, net                                                          |                                                                 |                           | 378.1    |           |         | (187.0    | )        |                 |        
|                                                                           |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|Total assets                                                               |                                                                 | $                         | 13,041.4 |           | $       | (120.7    | )        | $               | (1,673.2
|                                                                           |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|Liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit)                             |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|Liabilities not subject to compromise                                      |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|Current liabilities:                                                       |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|                                                                           | Accounts payable                                                |                           | $        | 385.8     |         | $         | 0.7      |                 | $       
|                                                                           | Accrued expenses                                                |                           |          | 745.1     |         |           | 6.6      |                 |         
|                                                                           | Accrued construction costs                                      |                           |          | 70.4      |         |           |         |                 |         
|                                                                           | Interest payable                                                |                           |          | 177.3     |         |           | 38.0     |                 |         
|                                                                           | Deferred revenue                                                |                           |          | 359.8     |         |           |         |                 |         
|                                                                           | Other current liabilities                                       |                           |          | 271.5     |         |           | (234.6   | )               |         
|                                                                           | Current portion of long-term debt                               |                           |          | 5,955.4   |         |           | (5,952.3 | )               |         
|                                                                           |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|                                                                           |                                                                 | Total current liabilities |          |           | 7,965.3 |           |          | (6,141.6        | )       
|Long-term debt                                                             |                                                                 |                           |         |           |         | 6,540.1   |          |                 |        
|Long-term debt discount                                                    |                                                                 |                           |         |           |         |          |          |                 | (221.3  
|Other                                                                      |                                                                 |                           |         |           |         |          |          |                 | 47.2    
|Deferred income taxes                                                      |                                                                 |                           | 94.4     |           |         |          |          |                 | 68.5    
|Commitments and contingent liabilities                                     |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|Liabilities subject to compromise                                          |                                                                 |                           | 10,157.8 |           |         | (10,157.8 | )        |                 |        
|Shareholders' (deficit) equity:                                            |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|                                                                           | Common stockold                                                |                           |          |          |         |           |         |                 |         
|                                                                           | Common stocknew                                                |                           |          |          |         |           | 0.5      |                 |         
|                                                                           | Additional paid-in capital                                      |                           |          | 14,045.5  |         |           | 1,194.1  |                 |         
|                                                                           | Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income                   |                           |          | (653.6    | )       |           | 0.4      |                 |         
|                                                                           | (Deficit) retained earnings                                     |                           |          | (18,568.0 | )       |           | 8,443.6  |                 |         
|                                                                           |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|                                                                           |                                                                 |                           | (5,176.1 | )         |         | 9,638.6   |          |                 | (1,534.9
|                                                                           |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         
|Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit)                       |                                                                 | $                         | 13,041.4 |           | $       | (120.7    | )        | $               | (1,673.2
|                                                                           |                                                                 |                           |          |           |         |           |          |                 |         

F-29

---



The change in the carrying amount of reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets during the year ended December 31, 2003 is
as follows (in millions):

|Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assetsJanuary 1, 2003   |  | $ | 653.3  |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------ | -
|Foreign currency exchange translation adjustments                                            |  |   | 64.6   |  
|Adjustment to deferred tax accounts                                                          |  |   | (178.8 | )
|                                                                                             |  |   |       
|Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assetsDecember 31, 2003 |  | $ | 539.1  |  
|                                                                                             |  |   |       

The
decrease in reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets during the year ended December 31, 2003 includes a tax benefit of approximately
$178.8 million that is primarily attributable to the use of tax losses on amended UK tax returns for 1997 through 1999. The deferred tax asset attributable to these tax losses had previously
been offset by a valuation allowance.

Pro Forma Results of Operations

The consolidated pro forma results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 assuming the emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization and
the adoption of fresh-start reporting occurred on January 1, 2001 follows (in millions, except per share data). The pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results
that would have occurred had the emergence
from Chapter 11 reorganization and the adoption of fresh-start reporting occurred on January 1, 2001, or that might occur in the future.

|                     |  | Year ended December 31, |         
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------- | --------
|
|Total revenue        |  | $                       | 3,265.1 
|Net (loss)           |  | $                       | (1,668.4
|Net (loss) per share |  | $                       | (28.04  

4.     Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 132 (Revised),Employers' Disclosures
About Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, an Amendment of FASB Statements 87, 88 and 106.This statement revises employers' disclosures about pension plans and other
postretirement plans, it does not change the measurement or recognition of these plans required by FASB Statement No. 87,Employers' Accounting for
Pensions, No. 88,Employers' Accounting for Settlement and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination
Benefits, and No. 106,Employers' Accounting for Postretirment Benefits Other Than Pensions. This statement replaces FASB
No. 132,Employers' Disclosures About Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits, and requires additional disclosures to those in the original
Statement No.132. This statement was developed in response to concerns expressed by users of financial statements about their needs for more information about pension plan assets, obligations, benefit
payments, contributions and net benefit costs. The statement is effective for financial statements with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003, and for foreign plans with fiscal years
ending after June 15, 2004. The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS 132 (revised) as of December 31, 2003.

F-30

---

5.     Asset Impairments

At December 31, 2003, the Company reviewed its long-lived assets for impairment. The Company engaged an independent financial advisor to assist
in the impairment review. The Company and the independent financial advisor determined that there was no impairment of the Company's long-lived assets as of December 31, 2003. This
determination was based upon various valuation methods, including discounted cash flow analysis, selected comparable market multiples of publicly traded companies and other applicable ratios and
economic information relevant to the operations of the Company. Certain factors that were incorporated into the impairment review included the following:



Asset
impairment charges were $445.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2002. These charges are non-cash charges to write-down certain assets to
their estimated fair values based on an assessment that their carrying value was not recoverable. These charges include fixed assets of $56.0 million, license acquisition costs of
$29.0 million and goodwill of $360.1 million. The charge with respect to fixed assets was estimated based upon the technological obsolescence of certain network and other equipment. The
charge with respect to license acquisition costs and goodwill was determined in accordance with SFAS No. 142. The aggregate asset impairment charge of $445.1 million related to the
Company's segments or division as follows: $405.5 million ntl: home, $5.3 million ntl: business, $29.0 million ntl: Ireland and $5.3 million Shared services division.

As
of December 31, 2001, the Company performed an analysis of the carrying values of its long-lived assets including goodwill. During 1999 and 2000, acquisitions were
made
against a background of increasing consolidation and record valuations in the telecommunications industry. This analysis was initiated because of the decline in NTL Europe, Inc.'s (formerly NTL
Incorporated's) stock price and significantly lower valuations for companies within its industry. Additionally, at the time of the Company's analysis, the book value of NTL Europe, Inc.'s net
assets significantly exceeded its market capitalization. Accordingly, the Company performed an analysis of the recoverability of its long-lived assets and associated goodwill. The fair
value of the Company's assets was determined by discounting the Company's estimates of the expected future cash flows related to these investments when the non-discounted cash flows
indicated that the long-lived assets would not be recoverable. The Company recorded a write-down of $8,161.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2001 as a result of this
analysis and review, of which $8,160.6 million is included in asset impairments and $1.0 million is included in share of losses from equity investments. The asset impairment charge of
$8,160.6 million included goodwill of $8,077.8 million, license acquisition costs of $58.8 million, customer lists of $9.1 million and other intangibles of
$14.9 million. The aggregate asset impairment charge of $8,161.6 million related to the Company's business segments as follows: $5,628.4 million ntl: home, $2,113.0 million
ntl: business, $419.7 million ntl: Ireland and $0.5 million ntl: broadcast.

6.     Acquisitions and disposals

In November 2001, the Company sold a portion of the indirect access customers acquired from Cable & Wireless Communications plc in May 2000.
The sales price was £10.2 million ($14.8 million)

F-31

---

which
does not include contingent payments for the collection of certain future service revenues and existing receivables. The Company recognized a loss on this sale of $88.5 million, after
deducting $102.0 million of unamortized intangibles. The value assigned to these assets upon acquisition was $135.9 million.

7.     Fixed Assets

Fixed assets consist of:

|                         |  |            |  | December 31, |         
|------------------------ |  | ---------- |  | ------------ | --------
|
|
|
|Operating equipment      |  | 530 years |  | $            | 8,413.9 
|Other equipment          |  | 530 years |  |              | 728.1   
|Construction-in-progress |  |            |  |              | 83.8    
|                         |  |            |  |              |         
|                         |  |            |  |              | 9,225.8 
|Accumulated depreciation |  |            |  |              | (1,345.3
|                         |  |            |  |              |         
|                         |  |            |  | $            | 7,880.5 
|                         |  |            |  |              |         

The
change in fixed assets is primarily the result of the $3,194.9 million reduction in the carrying value upon the adoption of fresh-start reporting as of January 1, 2003.

8.     Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of:

|                                                                                   |                           |            |  | December 31,
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ---------- |  | ------------
|
|
|
|Intangible assets not subject to amortization:                                     |                           |            |  |             
|                                                                                   | License acquisition costs |            |  |             
|Intangible assets subject to amortization:                                         |                           |            |  |             
|Customer lists, net of accumulated amortization of $221.9 (2003) and $121.0 (2002) |                           | 312 years |  |             
|                                                                                   |                           |            |  |             
|                                                                                   |                           |            |  | $           
|                                                                                   |                           |            |  |             

The
change in intangible assets is primarily the result of the $1,222.6 million increase in the carrying value of customer lists and the $23.6 million decrease in the
carrying value of license acquisition costs upon the adoption of fresh-start reporting as of January 1, 2003.

Estimated
aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years from December 31, 2003 is as follows: $221.9 million in 2004, $221.9 million in
2005, $220.3 million in 2006, $219.1 million in 2007 and $88.7 million in 2008.

F-32

---

9.     Liabilities Subject to Compromise

Liabilities subject to compromise consist of the following (in millions):

|                                      |                                                        | December 31,
2002
|------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------
|
|Accounts payable                      |                                                        | $                
|Interest payable                      |                                                        |                  
|Due to NTL Europe, Inc.               |                                                        |                  
|Accrued expenses                      |                                                        |                  
|Long-term debt:                       |                                                        |                  
|NTL Communications Corp:              |                                                        |                  
|                                      | 123/4% Senior Deferred Coupon Notes                    |                  
|                                      | 111/2% Senior Deferred Coupon Notes                    |                  
|                                      | 10% Senior Notes                                       |                  
|                                      | 91/2% Senior Sterling Notes, less unamortized discount |                  
|                                      | 103/4% Senior Deferred Coupon Sterling Notes           |                  
|                                      | 93/4% Senior Deferred Coupon Notes                     |                  
|                                      | 93/4% Senior Deferred Coupon Sterling Notes            |                  
|                                      | 111/2% Senior Notes                                    |                  
|                                      | 123/8% Senior Deferred Coupon Notes                    |                  
|                                      | 7% Convertible Subordinated Notes                      |                  
|                                      | 91/4% Senior Euro Notes                                |                  
|                                      | 97/8% Senior Euro Notes                                |                  
|                                      | 111/2% Senior Deferred Coupon Euro Notes               |                  
|                                      | 117/8% Senior Notes, less unamortized discount         |                  
|                                      | 123/8% Senior Euro Notes, plus unamortized premium     |                  
|                                      | 63/4% Convertible Senior Notes                         |                  
|Diamond Cable Communications Limited: |                                                        |                  
|                                      | 131/4% Senior Discount Notes                           |                  
|                                      | 113/4% Senior Disocunt Notes                           |                  
|                                      | 103/4% Senior Discount Notes                           |                  
|Diamond Holdings Limited:             |                                                        |                  
|                                      | 10% Senior Sterling Notes                              |                  
|                                      | 91/8% Senior Notes                                     |                  
|                                      |                                                        |                  
|                                      |                                                        | $                
|                                      |                                                        |                  

Upon
emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization and in accordance with the Plan, all of the outstanding public notes of NTL Communications Corp. were cancelled, and all of the outstanding
public notes of Diamond Cable Communications Limited were acquired by NTL Communications Corp. The Diamond Holdings Limited Notes remain outstanding.

F-33

---

10.   Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt, exclusive of amounts subject to compromise, consists of (in millions):

|                                             |                                                                              | December 31,
2003 |         | December 31,
2002 |  
|-------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | ------- | ----------------- | -
|
|Communications Cable Funding Corp:           |                                                                              |                   |         |                   |  
|                                             | DIP Facility                                                                 |                   | $       |                  |  
|NTL Communications Limited and subsidiaries: |                                                                              |                   |         |                   |  
|                                             | Senior Credit Facility                                                       |                   |         | 4,968.6           |  
|                                             | Working Capital Credit Facility                                              |                   |         |                  |  
|                                             | Other                                                                        |                   |         | 68.5              |  
|NTL (Triangle) LLC:                          |                                                                              |                   |         |                   |  
|                                             | 11.2% Senior Discount Debentures, less unamortized discount of
$115.4 (2003) |                   |         | 401.9             |  
|                                             | Other                                                                        |                   |         | 2.9               |  
|Diamond Holdings Limited:                    |                                                                              |                   |         |                   |  
|                                             | 10% Senior Sterling Notes, less unamortized discount of $38.7 (2003)         |                   |         | 202.2             |  
|                                             | 91/8% Senior Notes, less unamortized discount of $26.5 (2003)                |                   |         | 83.4              |  
|                                             | Other                                                                        |                   |         | 3.2               |  
|                                             |                                                                              |                   |         |                   |  
|                                             |                                                                              |                   | 5,730.7 |                   |  
|Less: current portion                        |                                                                              |                   | (2.3    | )                 |  
|                                             |                                                                              |                   |         |                   |  
|                                             |                                                                              | $                 | 5,728.4 |                   | $
|                                             |                                                                              |                   |         |                   |  

19% Senior Secured Notes due 2010

In connection with the Company's emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries issued $558.249 million aggregate
principal amount at maturity of 19% Senior Secured Notes due 2010 (the "Exit Notes") on January 10, 2003. Initial purchasers of the Company's Exit Notes also purchased 500,000 shares of the
Company's common stock on that date. The gross proceeds from the sale of the Exit Notes and such shares totaled $500.0 million. The proceeds were used in part to repay amounts outstanding under
the DIP facility and to purchase from NTL Delaware a £90.0 million note of NTL (UK) Group Inc. and to repay certain other obligations. The Exit Notes were due on
January 1, 2010. The Exit Notes were redeemable at the Company's option after January 10, 2003. Interest on the Exit Notes was payable in cash semiannually from July 1, 2003; with
respect to the interest payment of $50.4 million, which was due on July 1, 2003, the Company elected to pay the interest through the issuance of additional
"pay-in-kind" notes. The Company issued $56.1 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of Exit Notes with primarily the same terms as the original Exit Notes for
the interest payment.

The
Exit Notes including the "pay-in-kind" notes were repaid in full on November 17, 2003 following completion of the Company's rights offering.

F-34

---

DIP Facility

In connection with the Plan, some members of the official unsecured creditors' committee of bondholders committed to provide up to $500.0 million of new
debt financing to enable the business operations of the Company's former parent company and some of its subsidiaries to have access to sufficient liquidity to continue ordinary operations during the
Chapter 11 process. The Bankruptcy Court approved a DIP facility in the principal amount of $630.0 million (including a $130.0 million commitment from NTL (Delaware), Inc. and the
$500.0 million from certain members of the creditors' committee) in an order entered on July 3, 2002. On July 15, 2002, the various lenders under the DIP facility and NTL
(Delaware), Inc. entered into the DIP facility agreement with Communications Cable Funding Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, to provide $630.0 million in financing to
Communications Cable Funding Corp.

On
July 17, 2002, the Company drew the first tranche available under the facility in the amount of $229.0 million.

In
connection with the closing of the DIP facility, NTL Europe, Inc. and its debtor subsidiaries paid a closing fee to the DIP lenders equal to 2% of the $630.0 million
commitment ($12.6 million) in July 2002.

Each
term loan under the DIP facility incurred interest on the unpaid principal amount for three months from July 15, 2002 at the rate of 11% per annum. With respect to each
successive three month period following that date, the rate per annum increased incrementally by 1% over the immediately preceding three month period but will not exceed 18% per annum for any three
month period. Interest was payable in cash at least monthly. The DIP facility also included an unutilized commitment fee of 1/2% per annum on the aggregate principal amount of
unutilized commitments which is payable in cash each month.

The
$229.0 million balance outstanding under the DIP facility was repaid on the Effective Date.

Outstanding Public Notes

Upon emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization and in accordance with the Plan, all of the outstanding public notes of NTL Communications Corp. were cancelled, and
all of the outstanding public notes of Diamond Cable Communications Limited were acquired by NTL Communications Corp. The NTL (Triangle) LLC and Diamond Holdings Limited notes remain outstanding. The
outstanding Notes at December 31, 2003 comprise:



F-35

---





During 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company recognized $58.8 million, $96.7 million and $284.7 million, respectively, of original issue discount
as interest expense.

Other Indebtedness

In addition to the notes described above, a subsidiary of the Company has the following bank credit agreements outstanding at December 31, 2003:



The
Working Capital Credit Facility originally dated May 30, 2000 (and subsequently amended and restated) of approximately £408.3 million
($684.9 million), was repaid in full on
November 28, 2003 partly out of the net proceeds of the Company's rights offering and partly with cash on hand.

Long-term
debt repayments, excluding capital leases, are due as follows (in millions).

|2004                  |  | $ | 0.5     |  
|--------------------- |  | - | ------- | -
|2005                  |  |   | 4,612.3 |  
|2006                  |  |   | 36.1    |  
|2007                  |  |   | 838.9   |  
|2008                  |  |   | 351.2   |  
|Thereafter            |  |   | 0.9     |  
|                      |  |   |        
|Total debt payments   |  |   | 5,839.9 |  
|Less: current portion |  |   | (0.5    | )
|                      |  |   |        
|                      |  | $ | 5,839.4 |  
|                      |  |   |        

F-36

---

11.   Stock Option Plan

Following approval by the compensation committee of the board of directors, the Company adopted the NTL Incorporated 2003 Stock Option Plan (the "NTL 2003 Stock
Option Plan"). The NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan is intended to provide incentives to certain employees of the Company and its subsidiaries to foster and promote the long-term growth and
performance of the Company and to better align such employees' interests with the stockholders of the Company. Under the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan, options to purchase up to 5 million shares
of the Company's common stock may be granted from time to time to certain employees of the Company and its subsidiaries.
Accordingly, the Company has reserved 5 million shares of common stock for issuance under the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan.

All
options have a 10 year term and vest and become fully exercisable over a period of 3 to 5 years of continued employment. For the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan, the Company
adopted the fair value recognition provisions for FASB Statement No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation(SFAS 123). Under the
prospective method of adoption selected by the Company under the provisions of FASB Statement No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and
Disclosure(SFAS 148), the recognition provisions will be applied to all employee awards granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2003.

Prior
to 2003, the Company's employees participated in the various stock option plans of its former ultimate parent company. The Company accounted for stock options using the intrinsic
value method under APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees(APB 25) and related Interpretations.

Pro
forma information regarding net income and earnings per share, as presented in Note 2, is required by SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS 148, and has been determined
as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing
model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2003, 2002 and 2001:

|                        |  | For the Year ended December 31,
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|
|
|Risk-free Interest Rate |  | 3.91%                          
|Expected Dividend Yield |  | 0%                             
|Expected Volatility     |  | 0.869                          
|Expected Lives (years)  |  | 3.4                            

F-37

---

A
summary of the activity and related information of the NTL 2003 Stock Option Plan and the Company's former parent's stock option plans for the years ended December 31 is as
follows:

|                                                                          |  | 2003 |      | 2002 |   | 2001 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---- | ---- | - | -----
|
|
|
|Outstanding-beginning of year                                             |  |      |     |      |   |     
|Granted                                                                   |  |      | 3.9  |      |   | 13.85
|Exercised                                                                 |  |      | (0.2 | )    |   | 13.94
|Expired                                                                   |  |      |     |      |   |     
|Forfeited                                                                 |  |      | (0.5 | )    |   | 13.80
|                                                                          |  |      |      |      |   |      
|Outstanding-end of year                                                   |  |      | 3.2  |      | $ | 13.85
|                                                                          |  |      |      |      |   |      
|Exercisable at end of the year                                            |  |      | 0.3  |      | $ | 12.54
|                                                                          |  |      |      |      |   |      
|Weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the year |  | $    | 6.14 |      |   |      
|                                                                          |  |      |      |      |   |      

All
of the options to purchase shares of the Company's former ultimate parent company were cancelled on the Effective Date pursuant to the reorganization plan.

Exercise
prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 2003 ranged from $9 to $40. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of those options is 9.2 years.

12.   Derivative Financial Instruments

Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities," as amended by SFAS Nos. 137 and 138. This accounting standard requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in
the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in the results of operations or in other comprehensive loss, depending on whether a derivative is designated as a fair value or cash flow hedge.
The ineffective portion of all hedges is recognized in the results of operations. Beginning in October 1, 2001, the Company has recorded the change in the fair value of derivatives related to
changes in time value each period in other comprehensive loss for certain qualifying cash flow hedges.

On
January 1, 2001, the Company recorded all of its outstanding derivative instruments at their fair value. The outstanding derivative instruments were comprised of cross currency
swaps to hedge exposure to movements in the UK pound/U.S. dollar exchange rate, and a number of zero-cost collars to hedge exposure to floating interest rates on certain of its debt. The
aggregate fair value on January 1, 2001 was a liability of $2.2 million, which was recorded as other comprehensive loss.

In
2001, the Company entered into cross currency swaps to hedge exposure to movements in the Euro/UK pound exchange rate. In the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company recorded
other comprehensive loss of $1.4 million as a result of changes in the fair values. The aggregate fair value at

F-38

---

December 31,
2001 was a net liability of $3.6 million. In May 2002, the Company closed out its cross currency swaps for a cash payment of $2.0 million, and recognized a
loss of $2.0 million.

In
September 2001, the Company entered into a UK pound forward foreign exchange agreement, consisting of twenty-six accumulating forward contracts, to reduce
its exposure to movement in the UK pound/U.S. dollar exchange rate in accordance with its market risk strategies. As of December 31, 2001, the fair value of this instrument was a
liability of $0.3 million. In March 2002, this agreement was closed out and the Company received cash of £0.5 million.

13.   Other Charges Including Restructuring Charges

Other charges of $40.7 million in 2003 include restructuring charges of $36.7 million and $4.0 million of professional fees. Other charges of
$389.2 million in 2002 include restructuring charges of $104.8 million and non-cash charges of $284.4 million primarily for allowances for the cancellation of
receivables from the Company's former ultimate parent company and certain of its subsidiaries in accordance with the Plan. Other charges of $297.9 million in 2001 include restructuring charges
of $202.8 million and costs of $95.1 million incurred primarily to integrate the acquired companies, mostly related to information technology integration, as well as costs incurred for
business rationalization consulting.

Restructuring
charges of $36.7 million, $104.8 million and $202.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, relate to the
Company's actions to reorganize, re-size and reduce operating costs and create greater efficiency in various areas. An aggregate of $7.5 million of the 2002 restructuring charges
and $57.9 million of the 2001 restructuring charges were for the write-off of equipment and other assets that are not in use and will not require any future cash outlays. There were
no such costs in 2003. The employee severance and related costs in 2003 were for approximately 960 employees all of whom were terminated by the Company as of December 31, 2003. These costs in
2002 were for approximately 740 employees to be terminated, all of whom were terminated by the Company as of December 31, 2003. These costs in 2001 were for approximately 5,200 employees to be
terminated, all of whom were terminated by the Company as of December 31, 2003.

F-39

---

The
following table summarizes the restructuring charges incurred and utilized in 2001, 2002 and 2003 (in millions):

|                                                  |  | Employee
Severance
and Related
Costs |       | Lease
Exit
Costs |   | Agreement
Modifications |   | Fixed
Assets |       | Other |   | Total |  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | ----- | ---------------- | - | ----------------------- | - | ------------ | ----- | ----- | - | ----- | -
|Balance, December 31, 2000                        |  | $                                    | 47.9  |                  | $ | 18.0                    |   | $            |      |       | $ |      |  
|Released                                          |  |                                      | (6.6  | )                |   | (7.3                    | ) |              |      |       |   |      |  
|Charged to expense                                |  |                                      | 98.7  |                  |   | 32.4                    |   |              | 27.7  |       |   | 57.9  |  
|Utilized                                          |  |                                      | (67.5 | )                |   | (9.6                    | ) |              |      |       |   | (57.9 | )
|                                                  |  |                                      |       |                  |   |                         |   |              |       |       |   |       |  
|Balance, December 31, 2001                        |  |                                      | 72.5  |                  |   | 33.5                    |   |              | 27.7  |       |   |      |  
|Released                                          |  |                                      | (0.6  | )                |   | (15.1                   | ) |              | (11.5 | )     |   |      |  
|Charged to expense                                |  |                                      | 35.2  |                  |   | 78.9                    |   |              | 1.2   |       |   | 7.5   |  
|Utilized                                          |  |                                      | (87.5 | )                |   | (18.6                   | ) |              | (16.2 | )     |   | (7.5  | )
|                                                  |  |                                      |       |                  |   |                         |   |              |       |       |   |       |  
|Balance, December 31, 2002                        |  |                                      | 19.6  |                  |   | 78.7                    |   |              | 1.2   |       |   |      |  
|Foreign currency exchange translation adjustments |  |                                      | 1.6   |                  |   | 13.3                    |   |              | 0.1   |       |   |      |  
|Released                                          |  |                                      | (3.4  | )                |   | (1.2                    | ) |              | (0.3  | )     |   |      |  
|Charged to expense                                |  |                                      | 41.0  |                  |   | 0.8                     |   |              | 0.5   |       |   |      |  
|Utilized                                          |  |                                      | (58.8 | )                |   | (19.5                   | ) |              | (1.0  | )     |   |      |  
|                                                  |  |                                      |       |                  |   |                         |   |              |       |       |   |       |  
|Balance, December 31, 2003                        |  | $                                    |      |                  | $ | 72.1                    |   | $            | 0.5   |       | $ |      |  
|                                                  |  |                                      |       |                  |   |                         |   |              |       |       |   |       |  

14.   Income Taxes

The expense (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:

|               |                 | Year Ended December 31,
|-------------- | --------------- | -----------------------
|
|
|
|Current:       |                 |                        
|               | Federal         |                        
|               | State and local |                        
|               | Foreign         |                        
|               |                 |                        
|Total current  |                 |                        
|               |                 |                        
|Deferred:      |                 |                        
|               | Foreign         |                        
|               |                 |                        
|Total deferred |                 |                        
|               |                 |                        
|               |                 | $                      
|               |                 |                        

F-40

---



The Company's 2003 tax expense relates to state and local taxes, which is offset by a foreign tax benefit relating to operating losses for which a benefit was
recognized to the extent of deferred tax liabilities.

Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used
for income tax purposes. Significant components of deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows:

|                                            |                                 | December 31, |          
|------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------- | ------------ | ---------
|
|
|
|Deferred tax liabilities:                   |                                 |              |          
|                                            | Intangibles                     |              | $        
|                                            | Depreciation and amortization   |              |          
|                                            |                                 |              |          
|Total deferred tax liabilities              |                                 |              | 399.7    
|Deferred tax assets:                        |                                 |              |          
|                                            | Net operating losses            |              |          
|                                            | Capital losses                  |              |          
|                                            | Net deferred interest expense   |              |          
|                                            | Depreciation and amortization   |              |          
|                                            | Inventory                       |              |          
|                                            | Purchase accounting liabilities |              |          
|                                            | Allowance for doubtful accounts |              |          
|                                            | Other                           |              |          
|                                            |                                 |              |          
|Total deferred tax assets                   |                                 |              | 13,172.9 
|Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |                                 |              | (12,773.3
|                                            |                                 |              |          
|Net deferred tax assets                     |                                 |              | 399.6    
|                                            |                                 |              |          
|Net deferred tax liabilities                |                                 | $            | 0.1      
|                                            |                                 |              |          

At
December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company had a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets to the extent it was not more likely than not that such assets would be
realized in the future. To the extent the Company realizes a benefit attributable to the valuation allowance that existed as of January 10, 2003, such benefit would result in a decrease of
excess reorganization value and then a pro rata decrease among other long-lived assets.

On
the adoption of Fresh-Start reporting, adjustments were made to the Company's deferred tax balance, which were refined during 2003, giving rise to an adjustment to reorganization
value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets. The net effect of these adjustments was a decrease in the deferred tax liability of $92.7 million.

As
discussed in Note 1, the Company emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on January 10, 2003. The restructuring of the Company's debt gave rise to cancellation of
indebtedness income in 2003, which was non-taxable since the debt cancellation was in connection with a bankruptcy reorganization. However, to the extent that such amount is excluded from
U.S. taxable income, certain tax attributes

F-41

---

are
subject to reduction, including certain U.S. net operating loss carryforwards. The reduction of tax attributes, which is reflected in the above table, has had no impact on the Company's financial
statement position since the deferred tax assets related to these tax attributes were offset by a corresponding valuation allowance. Furthermore, the reorganization caused an ownership change pursuant
to Internal Revenue Service Code Section 382. Section 382 will limit the Company's ability to utilize the remaining U.S. net operating loss carryforwards that existed at
January 10, 2003 and may limit the Company's ability to deduct any built-in losses recognized within the subsequent five-year period. In addition, Section 382
will severely limit the Company's ability to utilize remaining U.S. capital loss carryforwards, within the five-year carryforward period. The Company anticipates having an overall
Section 382 limitation of approximately $50.0 million per year.

At
December 31, 2003, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $400 million for U.S. federal income tax purposes that expire in varying amounts
commencing in 2010. This excludes net operating loss carryforwards of certain companies that are taxable in both the U.S. and the United Kingdom. In addition, the Company has capital loss
carryforwards of approximately $7.8 billion for U.S. federal income tax purposes that expire in 2006. The Company does not expect to realize any benefit from these capital losses for various
reasons, including the Section 382 limitation discussed above. The Company has United Kingdom net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $5.5 billion that have no expiration date.
Pursuant to United Kingdom law, these losses are only available to offset income of the separate entity that generated the loss. A portion of the United Kingdom net operating loss carryforward relates
to dual resident companies, of which the U.S. net operating loss carryforward amount is approximately $1.9 billion. Section 382 will severely limit the Company's ability to utilize these
losses for US purposes. The Company also has United Kingdom capital loss carryforwards of approximately $21.6 billion that have no expiration date. However, the Company does not expect to
realize any significant benefit from these capital losses, which are only available to the extent the Company generates taxable United Kingdom capital gain income in the future.

The
reconciliation of income taxes computed at U.S. federal statutory rates to income tax expense is as follows:

|                                          |                                                    | Year Ended December 31, |       
|----------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ------
|
|
|
|(Benefit) at federal statutory rate (35%) |                                                    | $                       | (334.0
|Add:                                      |                                                    |                         |       
|                                          | Non-deductible assets impairments                  |                         |       
|                                          | Foreign losses with no benefit                     |                         |       
|                                          | U.S. losses with no benefit                        |                         |       
|                                          | Prior year accelerated depreciation                |                         |       
|                                          | State and local income tax, net of federal benefit |                         |       
|                                          |                                                    |                         |       
|Income tax expense (benefit)              |                                                    | $                       | 0.1   
|                                          |                                                    |                         |       

F-42

---

15.   Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments used the following methods and assumptions:

Cash and cash equivalents:The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value.

Marketable securities:The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value.

Long-term debt:The carrying amounts of the bank credit facilities approximate their fair values. The fair values
of the Company's other debt in the following table are based on the quoted market prices.

F-43

---

The
carrying amounts and fair values of the Company's financial instruments are as follows (in millions):

|                          |                                 | December 31, 2003 |       | December 31, 2002
|------------------------- | ------------------------------- | ----------------- | ----- | -----------------
|
|
|Cash and cash equivalents |                                 | $                 | 795.9 |                  
|Marketable securities     |                                 |                   |      |                  
|Long-term debt:           |                                 |                   |       |                  
|                          | 123/4% Notes                    |                   |       |                 
|                          | 111/2% Notes                    |                   |       |                 
|                          | 10% Notes                       |                   |       |                 
|                          | 91/2% Sterling Notes            |                   |       |                 
|                          | 103/4% Sterling Notes           |                   |       |                 
|                          | 93/4% Notes                     |                   |       |                 
|                          | 93/4% Sterling Notes            |                   |       |                 
|                          | 111/2% Notes                    |                   |       |                 
|                          | 123/8% Notes                    |                   |       |                 
|                          | 7% Convertible Notes            |                   |       |                 
|                          | 91/4% Euro Notes                |                   |       |                 
|                          | 97/8% Euro Notes                |                   |       |                 
|                          | 111/2% Euro Notes               |                   |       |                 
|                          | 117/8% Euro Notes               |                   |       |                 
|                          | 123/8% Euro Notes               |                   |       |                 
|                          | 63/4% Convertible Notes         |                   |       |                 
|                          | DIP Facility                    |                   |       |                 
|                          | Senior Credit Facility          |                   |       | 4,611.8          
|                          | Working Capital Credit Facility |                   |       | 356.8            
|                          | 11.2% Debentures                |                   |       | 401.9            
|                          | 131/4% Notes                    |                   |       |                 
|                          | 113/4% Notes                    |                   |       |                 
|                          | 103/4% Notes                    |                   |       |                 
|                          | 10% Sterling Notes              |                   |       | 202.2            
|                          | 91/8% Notes                     |                   |       | 83.4             

16.   Related Party Transactions

The Company has identified the following persons as being related parties of the Company:



F-44

---



The
Company has entered into several transactions with the above-identified related parties as described below.

Participating Purchaser Agreements

In connection with the Company's rights offering, on September 26, 2003, the Company entered into two separate participating purchaser agreements with each
of W.R. Huff Asset Management and Franklin Mutual Advisers. Each participating purchaser currently holds shares of the Company's common stock or is the general partner or investment manager of managed
funds and third party accounts that directly hold shares of the Company's common stock.

Under
these agreements, W.R. Huff Asset Management and Franklin Mutual Advisers each agreed, in exchange for a fee, to exercise the basic subscription privilege for all of the rights
distributed to them in the rights offering. This means W.R. Huff Asset Management purchased 4,582,594 shares of the Company's common stock for $40.00 and Franklin Mutual Advisers purchased 2,974,908
shares of the Company's common stock for $40.00. W.R. Huff Asset Management also purchased approximately 25,000 shares of the Company's common stock for $40.00 pursuant to the
over-subscription privilege available to all rights holders in the offering. Franklin Mutual Advisers also purchased 35,752 shares of the Company's common stock for $40.00 pursuant to the
over-subscription privilege available to all rights holders in the offering. Certain affiliates and managed accounts for which W.R. Huff Asset Management acts as an investment
adviser is entitled to receive a fee of $5.3 million and certain funds for which Franklin Mutual Advisers acts as an agent or investment adviser received a fee of $3.4 million.

The
shares of the Company's common stock which each participating purchaser received upon the exercise of rights and which the participating purchaser committed to exercise are
restricted stock under the Securities Act of 1933. Accordingly, the Company has entered into a registration rights agreement with each participating purchaser as well as Oaktree. The Company filed a
registration
statement with the SEC on February 13, 2004, to fulfil its obligations under their registration rights agreement, which registration statement is not yet effective.

F-45

---



Chapter 11 Reorganization and Exit Notes

At the time of the Company's emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, the Company issued shares of its common stock and Series A warrants to various
former creditors and stockholders of NTL Europe, and some of its subsidiaries, including the Company. The Company's principal stockholders received a significant amount of their equity interest in the
Company from that issuance.

Registration Rights Agreements

At the time of the Company's emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, the Company granted various registration rights to certain persons who were then the
Company's stockholders and warrant holders. The Company has filed a registration statement to fulfil its obligation under these registration rights.

The Company's Relationship with NTL Europe

At the time of the completion of the Plan, the Company had entered into several agreements with NTL Europe, including a Transitional Services Agreement, a
De-Merger Agreement, a Novation Agreement and a Tax Sharing Agreement.

Transitional Services Agreement

Under the Transitional Services Agreement, the Company has agreed to provide NTL Europe with some administrative and technical support services for a limited
period of time where the Company's personnel had previously been providing support to the companies now within the NTL Europe group of companies. The Company agreed to provide NTL Europe with support
if and when requested in the following areas: accounting, payroll and financial reporting support, technical assistance to NTL Europe's Spanish business, access to the Company's internal legal and tax
advisors with respect to historic matters and continued support in the management and monitoring of some of the joint ventures in which NTL Europe has investments. This agreement provides that the
Company's employees may, as appropriate, prioritize work performed for the Company ahead of work performed on behalf of NTL Europe.

In
addition, under the Transitional Services Agreement, the Company will provide services of two of the Company's employees to NTL Europe seconded on a full-time basis for a
period of up to two years, at NTL Europe's option, and permit NTL Europe and its group companies to continue to use the "NTL" name for a period of up to one year, in the case of NTL
Europe, and three years, in the case of some other of its subsidiaries.

NTL
Europe pays the Company pre-determined charges set out in the Transitional Services Agreement for the services provided by the Company and the Company's subsidiaries
under the agreement based on the amount of time spent by the relevant personnel in carrying out this work.

Demerger Agreement

The Demerger Agreement enables the Company and NTL Europe to have access to records and documents that they and the Company require but which are held by or in
the control of the other. In addition, the agreement provides, to the extent possible, all warranties, indemnities or liabilities relating to assets or companies which the Company currently own, but
which were originally acquired by NTL

F-46

---

Europe
or one of its subsidiaries before being transferred to the Company or one of the Company's subsidiaries, are transferred to the Company or the Company are given the benefit of the warranties,
covenants and indemnities relating to these assets or companies.

There
is no specified list of contracts to which the Demerger Agreement applies. Instead it is agreed that the Demerger Agreement will not apply to the agreements dealt with under the
Novation Agreement described below.

Novation Agreement

In May 2000, NTL Europe completed the acquisition of ConsumerCo. NTL Europe transferred ConsumerCo to the Company and the Company's subsidiaries in
February 2001 pursuant to an agreement originally signed in July 1999.

On
January 10, 2003, the Company, NTL Europe and C&W and some of their respective subsidiaries entered into a Novation Agreement. The agreement transfers the remaining rights and
obligations under the July 1999 transaction agreement and other related ancillary transaction documents from NTL Europe to the Company, except for C&W's rights as a shareholder in NTL Europe or
relating to securities of NTL Europe. The transferred rights and obligations include representations and warranties given by C&W in respect of ConsumerCo, mutual tax indemnities related to some tax
matters concerning ConsumerCo and the transfer of some properties between ConsumerCo and C&W where the relevant properties are owned by C&W or ConsumerCo but used by the other.

Tax Sharing Agreement

Until consummation of the Plan, the Company was a part of a federal consolidated income tax group having NTL Europe as the common parent corporation. Under the
Plan, the Company separated from the NTL Europe group, becoming a separate federal consolidated tax group. The Company entered into a Tax Sharing Agreement which allocates rights and responsibilities
for tax matters between the Company and NTL Europe and its affiliates.

In
general, the Company will have control over, and be responsible for, the preparation and filing of the Company's own tax returns and also any joint tax returns that include the
Company and the NTL Europe companies. NTL Europe will reimburse the Company for 14.5% of the costs associated with the Company's preparation of joint returns, including the federal income tax returns
for 2002 and 2003.

Although
it is not anticipated that there will be any federal income tax liability for 2002 or the portion of 2003 during which the Company is included in a joint return with NTL Europe,
the Company will be liable for any tax liability attributable to the Company, and NTL Europe will be liable for any tax liability attributable to NTL Europe and its affiliates. The Company will have
the exclusive right to determine the portion of tax liability attributable to the Company and NTL Europe on any reasonable
basis. Any refunds of taxes paid with respect to joint returns will also be reasonably apportioned between the Company and NTL Europe on a similar basis.

NTL
Europe's UK affiliates are required, as the Company may direct, to surrender group relief up to the maximum permitted by law to some of the Company's UK affiliates for tax periods
before, or that include, the date of the completion of the Plan as the Company may direct. This group relief

F-47

---

allows
the Company's UK affiliates to use deductions from NTL Europe's UK affiliates to reduce foreign taxable income. The Company also has the ability to cause NTL Europe's UK affiliates to amend any
claims for the surrender of group relief in order to give effect to such surrender.

The
Company has the exclusive right to control, contest and represent the Company's interests and NTL Europe's interest in any audit relating to a joint tax return. The Company also has
the right to resolve, settle or agree to any deficiency, claim or adjustment proposed, asserted or assessed in connection with any joint return if the matter involved could effect the Company.
However, NTL Europe has the exclusive authority to handle audits that relate solely to NTL Europe or its affiliates to the extent the asserted liability or matter either:



The
Company has an obligation to provide NTL Europe with information to keep NTL Europe informed and to give NTL Europe an opportunity to participate in discussions with tax authorities
regarding tax issues that involve NTL Europe or its affiliates. The Company has the right to reasonably apportion any costs associated with responding to an audit, claim or asserted deficiency of NTL
Europe.

NTL
Europe's ability to perform its continuing obligations under the Tax Sharing Agreement could be affected by a sale of some or all of its assets or by a change of control. Therefore,
NTL Europe is required to provide the Company with notice of any change of control of it or any of its affiliates. Finally, the Company and NTL Europe have customary rights and obligations to
cooperate, exchange information, provide notice and resolve disputes with respect to tax matters.

NTL's Relationship with ATX Communications, Inc.

The Company and ATX Communications, Inc., formerly known as CoreComm Holdco, Inc. and referred to in this annual report as ATX, both trace roots to
companies co-founded by Barclay Knapp, who was the Company's president and chief executive officer until August 15, 2003, and George Blumenthal, who was the Company's chairman prior
to the Company's emergence from Chapter 11 on January 10, 2003. Messrs. Knapp and Blumenthal co-founded the Company's predecessor in 1993.

Historically,
ATX and the Company have had substantially overlapping directors and executive officers. At one time, all of ATX's directors were also members of the Company's board of
directors. Many of the Company's executive officers were also officers of ATX. For example, Mr. Knapp previously served as president and chief executive officer of ATX and is now chairman of
ATX. Mr. Blumenthal previously served as the Company's chairman and treasurer and previously served as the chairman of ATX. Mr. Richard Lubasch was the Company's general counsel from the
Company's formation until August 15, 2003 and also served as general counsel for ATX for a substantial part of this period. Mr. Gregg Gorelick the Company's controller from the Company's
formation until August 15, 2003 also served as the controller for ATX for a substantial part of this period.

Until
the Company's emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, the Company provided ATX with management, financial, legal and administrative support services through the use of employees,
as well

F-48

---

as
access to office space and equipment and use of supplies and related office services. The salaries of employees providing services to ATX were charged to ATX by the Company based on an agreed upon
allocation for time spent providing services to ATX.

Amounts
charged to ATX by the Company consist of direct costs allocated to ATX where identifiable and a percentage of the portion of the Company's corporate overhead which cannot be
specifically allocated to the Company. Effective January 1, 2001, the percentage used to allocate corporate overhead was reduced. The Company's charges to ATX commenced in October 1998.
It is not practicable to determine the amounts of these expenses that would have been incurred had ATX operated as an unaffiliated entity. In the opinion of management at the time the allocations were
made, this allocation method was reasonable. The Company charged ATX $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002
and $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.

As
part of these arrangements, at an office location separate from the Company's corporate office, ATX provided the Company with access to office space and equipment and the use of
supplies until August 2001, when this office was closed. For these services, ATX charged the Company approximately $121,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001.

In
March 2000, ATX and the Company entered into an arrangement to link the Company's networks in order to create an international Internet backbone that commenced operations in
February 2001.

The
Company are advised that in December 2000, Mr. Knapp contributed $10,000,000, George Blumenthal, the Company's former chairman of the board and treasurer, contributed
$5,000,000, Richard Lubasch, the Company's former general counsel, contributed $600,000 and Ted H. McCourtney, the Company's former director, contributed $500,000 in financing to ATX. In return, ATX
issued these individuals unsecured convertible notes, with a maturity date of 2010 and a 10.75% interest rate, to be paid semi-annually. The notes were convertible into shares of ATX
common stock at $5.00 per share. Each of these individuals was a member of ATX's management and/or board of directors as well as a director and/or officer of the Company's at the time of this
contribution.

On
April 12, 2001, NTL Europe entered into a funding and commercial relationship letter agreement with ATX pursuant to which NTL Europe purchased $15.0 million of an
unsecured convertible note from ATX and received warrants to purchase 770,000 shares of ATX common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share that expire in April 2011. NTL Europe only, not
the Company, now holds the notes and warrants. Concurrently with this note purchase, the Company entered into a network and software agreement with ATX. Under this agreement ATX agreed to provide the
Company with U.S. network access for Internet traffic from the Company's UK customers for three years. The Company incurred costs of $0.3 million for network usage in the year ended
December 31, 2001. The Company has not incurred any additional costs related to the network subsequent to 2001. The network remains connected, but is not in use. In addition, ATX agreed to
grant the Company a perpetual irrevocable royalty-free license in a provisioning and billing system software application now known as Accelerator. Accelerator allows the Company's
customers to order the Company's services online. ATX also provides support, hosting and development services for this software application. The Company is currently in the process of documenting this
license and the support services to ensure that the terms of business between ATX and the Company are fully recorded.

F-49

---

On
May 18, 2001 the Company entered into a purchase and development agreement by which ATX licenses to the Company on a perpetual irrevocable royalty-free basis
billing software called Rater. Rater was being used by the Company at the time of this purchase and development agreement, and was being maintained and modified by ATX for the Company. This software
rates, extracts and reports on various services that the Company provide, including telephone calls and pay per view events. The sales price was cash of $9.8 million for the development costs
expended by ATX plus a fixed amount of $3.0 million representing the one-time license fee. In addition, under this purchase and development agreement, ATX also provides support and
development services
for this software. The Company are currently in the process of negotiating an amendment to the purchase and development agreement to ensure that the full terms of the commercial relationship between
ATX and the Company are fully documented, in particular the work required to be performed by ATX.

The
Company has been billed by ATX for the support, maintenance and development of Rater and Accelerator that the Company has received from ATX. ATX billed the Company
$2.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2003, $2.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2002 and $3.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2001 for
these services. In the past, the Company voluntarily prepaid for some services provided by ATX. At the present time, the Company pays ATX on a time and materials basis on 30-day invoices.

After
the Company emerged from Chapter 11 reorganization, the reconstituted audit committee of the Company's board of directors reviewed, with the assistance of outside counsel, the
appropriateness of the transactions with ATX described above. The Company has instituted controls and procedures that would be required before similar types of transactions are entered into in the
future. None of the persons who held positions with both ATX and the Company remain employed by the Company.

17.   Shareholders' Equity

Authorized Capital Stock

The Company's authorized capital stock consists of 400,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock.

The
number of authorized shares of any of the Company's preferred stock or its common stock may be increased or decreased, but not below the then number of shares outstanding or reserved
for issuance, by the vote of the holders of a majority of the Company's voting power. No vote of the holders of any of the Company's preferred stock or the Company's common stock voting separately as
a class is required. The Company's amended and restated certificate of incorporation, its amended and restated bylaws, its Series A Warrant Agreement, its Stockholder Rights Agreement, and the
form of indemnity agreement provided to its officers and directors contains the full legal text of the matters described in this section.

Common Stock

The holders of the Company's common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company's stockholders
and do not have cumulative voting rights. The holders of the Company's common stock are not entitled to vote on any amendment to the Company's amended and restated certificate of incorporation that
relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of the Company's preferred stock if the holders of the affected series of

F-50

---

the
Company's preferred stock are entitled, either separately or together with the holders of one or more other series of the Company's preferred stock, to vote on these amendments under the Company's
amended and restated certificate of incorporation or under the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL.

After
payment of any dividends due and owing to the holders of the Company's preferred stock, holders of the Company's common stock are entitled to receive proportionately any dividends
as may from time to time be declared by the Company's board of directors out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends.

In
the event of the Company's liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of the Company's common stock would be entitled to share proportionately in all of the Company's assets
available for distribution to holders of the Company's common stock remaining after payment of liabilities and liquidation preference of any of the Company's outstanding preferred stock. Holders of
common stock have no pre-emptive rights and have no rights to convert their common stock into any other securities. There are no redemption or sinking-fund provisions contained
in the Company's amended and restated certificate of incorporation with respect to the common stock. There is no liability for further calls or for assessments by the Company.

The
rights, preferences and privileges of holders of the Company's common stock may be adversely affected by the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock that may
be issued in the future.

The
Company's common stock currently trades under the symbol "NTLI" on the Nasdaq National Market.

Preferred Stock

The Company's board of directors has the authority to issue preferred stock. The preferred stock may be issued without any further vote or action by the Company's
stockholders in one or more series. The Company's board may fix as to any series of preferred stock the designation, title, voting powers and any other preferences as well as the other rights and
qualifications, limitations or restrictions. Since the Company is generally not permitted to issue any class of non-voting equity securities unless permitted by Section 1123(a)(6)
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, it may not be permitted to issue non-voting preferred stock.

The
ability of the Company's board of directors to issue one or more series of preferred stock provides increased flexibility in structuring possible future financing and acquisitions
and in meeting other corporate needs which might arise. The authorized shares of the Company's preferred stock, as well as shares of the Company's common stock, are available for issuance without
further action by the Company's stockholders, unless any action is required by applicable law, the rules of any exchange, automated quotation system or regulated quotation system on which the
Company's securities may be listed or quoted or applicable rules of any self-regulatory organization. The Company's board of directors will make any determination to issue the shares based
on its judgment as to the Company's best interests and the best interests of the Company's stockholders. The Company's board of directors, in so acting, could issue preferred stock having terms that
could discourage an acquisition attempt or other transaction that some or a majority of the stockholders might believe to be in their best interests

F-51

---

or
in which stockholders might receive a premium for their shares over the then current market price of the Company's common stock.

Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock

In connection with the adoption of the Company's stockholder rights plan, the Company has designated and reserved for issuance a total of 1,000,000 shares of the
Company's Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock. When issued and paid for in accordance with the Stockholder Rights Agreement, the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock
will be fully paid and non-assessable. The Company will appoint a transfer agent for the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock if and when any shares are issued.

Dividends and Ranking.Each share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock will entitle its holder to receive
dividends out of the Company's funds legally available for the payment of dividends. With respect to those dividends, the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock will rank:



Dividends
are payable quarterly in cash on the fifteenth day of March, June, September and December of each year, in an amount per share adjusted proportionately to account for any stock
dividends on, or subdivisions or combinations of, the Company's common stock, equal to the greater of:



Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding up.Upon the Company's liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of outstanding
shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock will be entitled to be paid out of the assets available for distribution to the Company's stockholders after payment of any liquidation
values of any securities senior in liquidation rights to the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock. The holders of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock will be
entitled to receive, subject to adjustment for a stock dividend on, or a subdivision or combination or consolidation of, the Company's common stock, the greater of:



If,
upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of us, the remaining assets available for distribution are insufficient to pay the holders of the Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock and

F-52

---

all
other securities ranking equally with the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock with respect to liquidation the full amount to which they are entitled, the holders of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock will share those remaining assets ratably with the holders of these equally ranking securities. Following the payment of the liquidation value in
full with respect to each share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, no additional distributions will be made to the holders of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock.

Voting Rights.Subject to adjustment for a stock dividend on, or a subdivision or combination of, the Company's common stock,
each share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock will entitle the holder to 1,000 votes on all matters submitted to a vote of holders of the Company's common stock. The holders of
the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock will vote together as a single class with the holders of the Company's common stock.

If
dividends on the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock are in arrears in an amount equal to six quarterly dividends, whether or not consecutive, the holder of the
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock will, voting as a single class with the holders of other shares of preferred stock having similar rights, be entitled to elect two new directors to
the Company's board of directors. The directors will serve until dividends on the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock are no longer in arrears.

Redemption.The Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock are not redeemable.

Conversion.The Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock are not convertible.

Stockholder Rights Agreement

The Stockholder Rights Agreement is intended to encourage a potential acquirer to negotiate directly with the Company's board of directors, but may have
anti-takeover effects. The Stockholder Rights Agreement could cause substantial dilution to a person or group that acquires a substantial interest in the Company without the prior approval
of the Company's board of directors. The effect of the stockholder rights may be to delay, defer or prevent a change in control of the Company that may be beneficial to the Company's stockholders.

The
Company's Stockholder Rights Agreement provides that each share of the Company's common stock will be accompanied by a right to purchase from the Company one
one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at a purchase price determined from time to time by the Board of Directors, subject to adjustment pursuant
to the terms of the Stockholder Rights Agreement.

For
purposes of the Stockholder Rights Agreement, an acquiring person is deemed a person or group of persons who acquire the beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Company's common
stock then outstanding, except under limited circumstances. Generally, the acquisition of shares of common stock directly from the Company does not result in a person being deemed to be an acquiring
person. In connection with the Company's board's decision to make the rights offering in November 2003, the board amended the Stockholder Rights Agreement to generally exclude from this
exception shares acquired on the exercise of rights.

The
stockholder rights are attached to all common stock certificates representing shares then outstanding. No separate stockholder rights certificates will be distributed. Generally, the
stockholder

F-53

---

rights
will separate from the common stock on the stockholder rights distribution date, which will occur on the earlier of the close of business on:



Before
the stockholder rights distribution date, the stockholder rights are transferable only with the transfer of the underlying shares of common stock. After the stockholder rights
distribution date, stockholder rights certificates will be mailed to holders of the Company's common stock as of a set record date. Once distributed, the separate stockholder rights certificates alone
will represent the stockholder rights. Only shares of common stock issued prior to the stockholder rights distribution date will be issued with stockholder rights.

The
stockholder rights are not exercisable until the stockholder rights distribution date and will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on January 10, 2013 unless the
date is extended by the board of directors or the stockholder rights are earlier redeemed or exchanged by the Company.

If,
after any person or group becomes an acquiring person,



each
holder of a stockholder right, except as noted below, will have the right to receive instead of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, upon the exercise of the stockholder right,
that number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company having a market value of two times the aggregate exercise price of the stockholder right. All stockholder rights beneficially owned by an
acquiring person will be null and void.

At
any time until a person becomes an acquiring person, the Company's board of directors may redeem the stockholder rights in whole, but not in part, at a price of $0.01 per stockholder
right. In

F-54

---

addition,
in specified circumstances, the Company's board of directors may, at any time after a person becomes an acquiring person and after the expiration of any period during which the stockholder
rights were exercisable, redeem all but not less than all of the then outstanding stockholder rights at a price of $0.01 per stockholder right:



At
any time after a person becomes an acquiring person and prior to the acquisition by that person or group of 50% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, the Company's board
of directors may exchange the stockholder rights, in whole or in part, for common stock at an exchange ratio of
one share of common stock, or one one-thousandth of a share of stockholder rights preferred stock or of a share of a class or series of the Company's preferred stock having equivalent
rights, preferences and privileges, per stockholder right subject to adjustment. The stockholder rights of the acquiring person become void.

Until
a stockholder right is exercised, the holder of the stockholder right will have no rights as a stockholder of the Company. While the distribution of the stockholder rights should
not be taxable to holders of common stock or to the Company, the Company's stockholders may, depending upon the circumstances, recognize taxable income in the event that the stockholder rights become
exercisable for the Company's common stock or other consideration of the Company's or for common stock of the acquiring company or in the event of the redemption of the stockholder rights as set forth
above.

Generally,
the Company's board of directors may amend any of the provisions of the Stockholder Rights Agreement prior to the stockholder rights distribution date. After the stockholder
rights distribution date, the Company's board of directors may amend the provisions of the Stockholder Rights Agreement in order to cure any ambiguity, to correct or supplement any provision which may
be defective or inconsistent with any other provision, to make changes that do not adversely affect the interests of holders of stockholder rights, or to shorten or lengthen any time period under the
Stockholder Rights Agreement. However, the Stockholder Rights Agreement may not be amended to lengthen a time period relating to when the stockholder rights may be redeemed at the time when the
stockholder rights are not then redeemable or any other time period unless any lengthening is for the purpose of protecting, enhancing or clarifying the rights of, and the benefits to, the holders of
stockholder rights under the Stockholder Rights Agreement.

Series A Warrants

On the effective date of the Plan, the Company issued Series A warrants to some of its former creditors and stockholders. The Series A warrants were
initially exercisable for a total of 8,750,496 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $309.88 per share. After adjustment to account for the rights offering in accordance with the
anti-dilution adjustment provisions described below, the Series A warrants are exercisable for a total of 10,313,158 shares of common stock at an exercise price of

F-55

---

$262.93
per share. The Series A warrants expire on January 10, 2011. The agreement governing the Series A warrants is governed by New York law. The Series A warrants are
listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "NTLIW." The Series A warrants may be subject to further change.

Instead
of paying the aggregate exercise price, the holder of a Series A warrant may request that the Company delivers a number of shares of its common stock equal to:



Following
this adjustment, the holders of Series A warrants will be entitled to receive the number and kind of shares of common stock or other securities which they would have
received if their Series A warrants had been exercised immediately before the occurrence of any of these events.

The
Series A warrant exercise price also will be adjusted pursuant to the terms of the Series A Warrant Agreement if the Company:



Upon
the adjustment of the exercise price, the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Series A warrants will be adjusted pursuant to the terms of the Series A
Warrant Agreement. Under the Series A Warrant Agreement, if the closing price of the Company's common stock on the record date is more than the exercise price of the rights, there will be an
adjustment to the warrant exercise price based on a formula.

F-56

---



The
Series A Warrant Agreement further provides that some other actions or events may trigger an adjustment in the exercise price of the Series A warrants, including some
recapitalizations or reclassifications of shares of the Company's common stock, consolidations or mergers, sales or transfers of all or substantially all of the Company's assets and compulsory share
exchanges. If one of these events takes place as part of a cash transaction then the following criteria apply:



If
the above-mentioned criteria are satisfied then the Series A warrants will become warrants of the acquiring person or, in specified circumstances, the warrants of an affiliate
of the acquiring person. These warrants, as modified, will also expire on January 10, 2011 and will:



In
the event of a cash transaction, the adjustment multiple referred to above will equal the exercise price divided by the cash consideration payable in respect of one share of common
stock in the cash transaction. In the event of a transaction consummated with a combination of cash and non-cash consideration to which cash transaction treatment would apply for purposes
of the warrant, the

F-57

---

adjustment
multiple will equal the exercise price divided by the cash consideration payable in respect of one share of common stock in the transaction, plus:



Concurrently
with the consummation of a cash transaction or a cash and non-cash consideration transaction to which cash transaction treatment would apply for purposes of the
warrants:



If
these criteria are not satisfied but a cash transaction is entered into or publicly announced on or before January 10, 2006, subject to consummation of the transaction, the
exercise price will be automatically adjusted to equal 90% of the cash consideration per share of common stock payable in the transaction. The transaction will not be consummated unless and until a
notice setting forth the adjustment has been mailed to all registered holders of Series A warrants. The record date for the mailing will be two business days prior to the first mailing of the
adjustment. The notice period must remain open for a period of at least 20 business days from the date of first mailing of the adjustment notice. On the later to occur of the expiration of the
20-business day notice period and consummation of the transaction, any Series A warrant not previously exercised will expire at that time.

If
on or after January 10, 2003 and prior to January 10, 2011, a transaction of the type described above is consummated and the consideration payable to holders of common
stock consists solely of non-cash consideration:



F-58

---



If
on or after January 10, 2003 and prior to January 10, 2011, a transaction of the type described above is consummated and the consideration payable to holders of common
stock consists partly of cash consideration and partly of non-cash consideration:



If
non-cash transaction treatment applies to Series A warrants in a transaction with both cash and non-cash consideration:



No
adjustment in the exercise price of the Series A warrants will be required if the adjustment, together with any prior adjustments not made, is less than 1% of the
Series A warrants' current exercise price or if Series A warrant holders are to participate in the transaction. No adjustment in the exercise price of the Series A warrants will
be required in the case of a change in the par value of the common stock. To the extent the Series A warrants become convertible into cash, no adjustment will be required thereafter.

In
the event that the exercise price is adjusted, the Company will, within 25 days, deliver to the warrant agent, with notice to the Series A warrant holders, a certificate
setting forth the exercise price after the adjustment and setting forth, in reasonable detail, the method of calculation therefor and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of a
Series A warrant. Upon each adjustment of the Series A warrant exercise price, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of each outstanding Series A warrant
will be adjusted accordingly. Prior to the Company

F-59

---

undertaking
some actions, the Company must mail a notice detailing the transaction at least 10 or 20 days, depending on certain circumstances, prior to the applicable record date or promptly in
the case of events for which there is no record date.

18.   Employee Benefit Plans

Certain subsidiaries of the Company operate defined benefit pension plans in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. The assets of the plans are held
separately from those of the Company and are invested in specialized portfolios under the management of an investment group. The pension cost is calculated using the projected unit method. The
Company's policy is to fund amounts to the defined benefit plans necessary to comply with the funding requirements as prescribed by the laws and regulations in the United Kingdom and the Republic of
Ireland.

F-60

---

The
Company's defined benefit pension plans use a measurement date of December 31:

Obligations and Funded Status

|                                        |  | Year Ended December 31, |      
|--------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | -----
|
|
|
|Change in Projected Benefit Obligation  |  |                         |      
|Benefit obligation at beginning of year |  | $                       | 363.7
|Acquisition                             |  |                         |     
|Service cost                            |  |                         | 11.4 
|Interest cost                           |  |                         | 20.3 
|Members contributions                   |  |                         | 3.1  
|Plan amendments                         |  |                         | 0.1  
|Actuarial losses                        |  |                         | 24.9 
|Benefits paid                           |  |                         | (11.5
|SFAS 88 events                          |  |                         | 2.7  
|Expenses                                |  |                         | (0.7 
|Foreign currency exchange rate changes  |  |                         | 44.8 
|                                        |  |                         |      
|Benefit obligation at end of year       |  | $                       | 458.8
|                                        |  |                         |      

|                                               |  | Year Ended December 31, |      
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | -----
|
|
|
|Change in Plan Assets                          |  |                         |      
|Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |  | $                       | 234.1
|Actual return on plan assets                   |  |                         | 38.7 
|Employer contributions                         |  |                         | 8.7  
|Employee contributions                         |  |                         | 3.1  
|SFAS 88 events                                 |  |                         |     
|Benefits paid                                  |  |                         | (11.5
|Expenses                                       |  |                         | (0.7 
|Foreign currency exchange rate changes         |  |                         | 29.5 
|                                               |  |                         |      
|Fair value of plan assets at end of year       |  | $                       | 301.9
|                                               |  |                         |      

F-61

---

|                                   |  | Year Ended December 31, |       
|---------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------
|
|
|
|Funded status                      |  |                         | (156.8
|Unrecognized net losses            |  |                         | 5.6   
|Unrecognized prior service costs   |  |                         | 0.1   
|Unrecognized transition obligation |  |                         |      
|                                   |  |                         |       
|Net amount recognized              |  | $                       | (151.1
|                                   |  |                         |       

At
the start of 2003, Fresh Start accounting applied. Accordingly, the unrecognized losses of $147.4 million, the unrecognized transition obligation of $5.0 million and the
unrecognized prior service costs of $0.2 million were recognized in the balance sheet at the start of 2003.

|                                                                      |  | Year Ended December 31, |       
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------
|
|
|
|Amounts Recognized in the Statement of Financial Position Consist of: |  |                         |       
|Prepaid benefit cost                                                  |  |                         |      
|Accrued benefit liability                                             |  |                         | (151.8
|Intangible asset                                                      |  |                         |      
|Accumulated other comprehensive loss                                  |  |                         | 0.7   
|Other                                                                 |  |                         |      
|                                                                      |  |                         |       
|Net amount recognized                                                 |  | $                       | (151.1
|                                                                      |  |                         |       

The
accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit plans was $424.1 million and $315.8 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002 respectively.

Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets

|                               |  | Year Ended December 31,
|------------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|
|
|
|Accumulated benefit obligation |  | 424.1                  
|Fair value of plan assets      |  | 301.9                  

F-62

---

Information for pension plans with an projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets

|                             |  | Year Ended December 31,
|---------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|
|
|
|Projected benefit obligation |  | 458.8                  
|Fair value of plan assets    |  | 301.9                  

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs

|                                      |  | Year ended December 31, |      
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | -----
|
|
|
|Service cost                          |  | $                       | 11.4 
|Interest cost                         |  |                         | 20.3 
|Expected return on plan assets        |  |                         | (19.8
|Amortization of transition obligation |  |                         |     
|Amortization of prior service costs   |  |                         |     
|Recognized actuarial loss             |  |                         |     
|SFAS 88 adjustment                    |  |                         | 3.5  
|                                      |  |                         |      
|Total net periodic benefit cost       |  | $                       | 15.4 
|                                      |  |                         |      

Additional Information

|                                                                     |  | December 31,
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|
|
|
|Increase in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income |  | $           

|                                                                       |  |  |  | January 1, 2003 |       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------- | ------
|
|
|(Decrease) in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income |  |  |  | $               | (103.7

F-63

---



Assumptions

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:

|                              |  | December 31, |  
|----------------------------- |  | ------------ | -
|
|
|Discount rate                 |  | 5.51         | %
|Rate of compensation increase |  | 3.04         | %

Weighted-average
assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs:

|                                                 |  | December 31, |  
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------ | -
|
|
|Discount rate                                    |  | 5.51         | %
|Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets |  | 6.70         | %
|Rate of compensation increase                    |  | 3.87         | %

Where
investments are held in bonds and cash, the expected long-term rate of return is taken to be yields generally prevailing on such assets at the measurement date. The
higher rate of return is expected on equity investments, which is based more on realistic future expectations than on the returns that have been available historically. The overall expected
long-term rate on assets is then the average of these rates taking into account the underlying assets portfolios of the pension plans.

Plan Assets

NTL's pension plan weighted-average assets allocations at December 31, 2003, and 2002, by asset category are as follows:

|                  |       | December 31, |      
|----------------- | ----- | ------------ | -----
|
|
|Asset Category    |       |              |      
|Equity Securities |       | 76.2         | %    
|Debt Securities   |       | 22.5         | %    
|Real Estate       |       | 0.0          | %    
|Other             |       | 1.3          | %    
|                  |       |              |      
|                  | Total |              | 100.0
|                  |       |              |      

The
trustees of the main defined benefit pension plan, which makes up over 80% of the assets of the defined benefit pension plans of the Company, have in place an agreement with the
investment managers that targets an allocation of 72% equities and 28% bonds and cash at December 31, 2003. Deviations from these central targets are permitted from time to time. Because the
main defined

F-64

---

benefit
pension plan is now closed to new entrants, the investment strategy is moving towards a higher proportion of bonds over time to reflect the steadily maturing profile of liabilities.

There
were no shares of the Company's common stock included in the Equity Securities at December 31, 2003 and 2002 respectively.

Cash flows

Contributions

At December 31, 2003, all of the Company's pension plans have projected benefit obligations exceeding plan assets totalling $156.9 million. The
Company will need to fund these deficits in accordance with the laws and regulations in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. The Company expects to contribute a total of approximately
£14.9 million ($26.6 million) during 2004, of which £13.0 million ($23.2 million) related to the largest of the Company's defined benefit plans.

In
2003, the Company received an actuarial valuation as of December 31, 2002, of the largest of the Company's defined benefit pension plans, which represented approximately 82.9%
of total plan assets and 83.3% of total projected benefit obligations at December 31, 2003. Based upon this actuarial valuation of the assets as of the valuation date of December 31,
2002, this plan has a projected benefit obligation exceeding the fair value of plan assets by approximately £82.3 million, or $146.8 million. The Company will need to fund
this deficit in accordance with the laws and regulations in the United Kingdom. The Company will need to contribute approximately £13.0 million ($23.2 million) in cash
payments annually beginning January 1, 2004, and must increase this contribution by 4% for each succeeding year for a period of eleven and one half years in order to eliminate the current
deficit. The actuarial valuation of the Company's pension plans requires the use of assumptions and estimates. These assumptions may differ from those used in calculating the amounts required to be
disclosed in accordance with SFAS 132. Changes in these assumptions and estimates as well as future investment returns could potentially have a material impact, either upwards or downwards, on
the estimated funding requirement

Estimated Future Benefit Payments

The benefits expected to be paid out of the pension plans in total are set out below for each of the next five years and the following five years in aggregate.
The benefits expected to be paid are based on the same assumptions used to measure the Company's benefit obligation at December 31, 2003 and include estimated future employee services.

|                |  | Pension Benefits
|--------------- |  | ----------------
|
|2004            |  | $               
|2005            |  |                 
|2006            |  |                 
|2007            |  |                 
|2008            |  |                 
|Years 20092013 |  |                 

F-65

---

Defined contribution pension plans

The Company has a number of defined contribution plans that allow eligible employees to contribute a percentage of their salaries in accordance with specified
guidelines. The Company matches the employees' contributions up to specified limits. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company contributed $16.9 million,
$16.5 million and $19.3 million respectively. There were no significant changes to the Company's defined contribution plans for the year ended December 31, 2003.

19.   Leases

A summary of assets held under capital lease are as follows (in millions).

|                               |  | December 31, |      
|------------------------------ |  | ------------ | -----
|
|
|Land, Building and equipment   |  | $            | 98.7 
|Less: accumulated depreciation |  |              | (40.0
|                               |  |              |      
|                               |  | $            | 58.7 
|                               |  |              |      

Future
minimum annual payments at December 31, 2003 are as follows (in millions). The table reflects the Company's contractual obligations.

|                                         |      | Capital
Leases |        | Operating
Leases
|---------------------------------------- | ---- | -------------- | ------ | ----------------
|Year ended December 31:                  |      |                |        |                 
|                                         | 2004 |                | $      | 8.7             
|                                         | 2005 |                |        | 7.9             
|                                         | 2006 |                |        | 7.6             
|                                         | 2007 |                |        | 7.5             
|                                         | 2008 |                |        | 7.1             
|Thereafter                               |      |                | 177.8  |                 
|                                         |      |                |        |                 
|Total minimum lease payments             |      |                | 216.6  |                 
|                                         |      |                |        |                 
|Less: amount representing interest       |      |                | (145.2 | )               
|                                         |      |                |        |                 
|Present value of net minimum obligations |      |                | 71.4   |                 
|Less: current portion                    |      |                | (1.8   | )               
|                                         |      |                |        |                 
|                                         |      | $              | 69.6   |                 
|                                         |      |                |        |                 

Leases
for buildings, offices space and equipment extend through 2031. Total rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 under operating leases was
$130.3 million, $140.1 million and $74.5 million respectively.

F-66

---

20.   Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

At December 31, 2003, the Company was committed to pay approximately $479.2 million for equipment and services and for investment in, and loans to,
affiliates. This amount includes approximately $147.5 million for operations and maintenance contracts and other commitments from January 1, 2005 to 2013. The aggregate amount of the
fixed and determinable portions of these obligations for the succeeding five fiscal years is as follows (in millions):

|                        |      |  
|----------------------- | ---- | -
|Year ended December 31: |      |  
|                        | 2004 |  
|                        | 2005 |  
|                        | 2006 |  
|                        | 2007 |  
|                        | 2008 |  
|                        |      |  
|                        |      | $
|                        |      |  

The
Company is involved in certain disputes and litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. None of these matters are expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The
Company's banks have provided guarantees in form of performance bonds on the Company's behalf as part of the Company's contractual obligations. The fair value of the guarantees has
been calculated by reference to the monetary value for each performance bond. The amount of commitment expires over the following periods (in millions):

|                        |      |  
|----------------------- | ---- | -
|Year ended December 31: |      |  
|                        | 2004 |  
|                        | 2005 |  
|                        | 2006 |  
|                        | 2007 |  
|                        | 2008 |  
|Thereafter              |      |  
|                        |      |  
|                        |      | $
|                        |      |  

21.   Industry Segments

The Company implemented a reorganization of certain of its business segments during 2003. The associated changes included moving its wholesale Internet business
unit from ntl: business to ntl: home, its public safety business unit from ntl: business to ntl: broadcast and the creation of ntl: carriers by merging its carriers business unit with its mobile
business unit and removing both from ntl: business. These changes better align the expertise in the divisions with the needs of the Company's customers. In addition, the allocation of certain costs
from Shared Services division to the various segments and the allocation of costs between ntl: home and ntl: business have changed. Finally, ntl: Ireland is a separate segment for financial reporting
purposes effective January 1, 2003. Amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

F-67

---



As a result, the Company has five reportable segments:

ntl: home, which provides residential telephone, cable television and Internet services, as well as wholesale Internet access solutions to
ISPs in the UK;

ntl: business, which provides data, voice and Internet services to large businesses, public sector organizations and SMEs located near the
Company's existing residential broadband network in the UK;

ntl: broadcast, which provides digital and analog television and radio broadcast transmission services, network management, tower site
rental and satellite and media services, as well as radio communications to public safety sector organizations in the UK;

ntl: carriers, which provides national and international communications transport services to communications companies in the UK and the
Republic of Ireland; and

ntl: Ireland, which provides primarily cable television services, as well as telephone and Internet services, to residential customers and
television, data, voice and Internet services to business customers in the Republic of Ireland.

The
Company's reportable segments are supported by various central shared services, including ntl: networks, which manages the Company's UK national network. Other shared services
include finance, information technology or IT, and human resources. Shared services also include assets and related depreciation and amortization that are not allocated to another segment.
ntl: Ireland relies upon these central shared services to a lesser extent than the Company's other reportable segments.

The
Company's primary measure of profit or loss for each reportable segment is segment profit (loss), and is defined below. The Company considers this measure an important indicator of
the operational strength and performance of its reportable segments and of the trends affecting its segments. This measure excludes the impact of costs and expenses that do not directly effect cash
flows such as depreciation, amortization and share of income (losses) from equity investments. The Company also excludes costs and expenses that are not directly related to the performance of a single
reportable segment from this measure such as interest income and expense, and gains or losses on foreign currency transactions, rather than allocating these costs and expenses to multiple reportable
segments. Segment profit (loss) also excludes the impact on the Company's results of operations of items that it believes are not characteristic of its underlying business operations for the period in
which they are recorded. Other charges and recapitalization expenses are excluded from this measure for these reasons, as well as because certain of their components are not directly related to the
performance of a single reportable segment. This financial measure and combined segment profit should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, operating (loss), net (loss) and other
measures of financial performance reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The reconciliation of combined segment profit to net (loss) can be found further below.

F-68

---

Selected
financial information for each reportable segment and the shared services division for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 is as follows (in millions):

|                                   |  | ntl:
home |         | ntl: business |   | ntl: broadcast |  | ntl: carriers |         | ntl: Ireland |   | Shared services |  | Total
|---------------------------------- |  | --------- | ------- | ------------- | - | -------------- |  | ------------- | ------- | ------------ | - | --------------- |  | -----
|Year ended December 31, 2003       |  |           |         |               |   |                |  |               |         |              |   |                 |  |      
|Revenue                            |  | $         | 2,442.5 |               | $ | 461.2          |  | $             | 439.2   |              | $ | 183.8           |  | $    
|Segment profit(1)                  |  |           | 1,101.6 |               |   | 170.4          |  |               | 188.7   |              |   | 150.8           |  |      
|Depreciation and amortization      |  |           | 965.1   |               |   | 120.1          |  |               | 146.3   |              |   | 174.9           |  |      
|Expenditures for long-lived assets |  |           | 339.5   |               |   | 50.9           |  |               | 37.9    |              |   | 11.9            |  |      
|Total assets(2)                    |  |           | 7,041.1 |               |   | 688.6          |  |               | 1,453.4 |              |   | 752.7           |  |      
|Year ended December 31, 2002       |  |           |         |               |   |                |  |               |         |              |   |                 |  |      
|Revenue                            |  | $         | 2,139.0 |               | $ | 469.8          |  | $             | 386.6   |              | $ | 179.7           |  | $    
|Segment profit(1)                  |  |           | 886.6   |               |   | 105.0          |  |               | 165.8   |              |   | 148.6           |  |      
|Depreciation and amortization      |  |           | 992.5   |               |   | 393.8          |  |               | 72.9    |              |   | 22.8            |  |      
|Expenditures for long-lived assets |  |           | 471.9   |               |   | 83.9           |  |               | 64.5    |              |   | 48.8            |  |      
|Total assets(3)                    |  |           | 7,790.0 |               |   | 3,115.0        |  |               | 551.2   |              |   | 329.1           |  |      
|Year ended December 31, 2001       |  |           |         |               |   |                |  |               |         |              |   |                 |  |      
|Revenue                            |  | $         | 2,080.5 |               | $ | 515.0          |  | $             | 351.8   |              | $ | 180.0           |  | $    
|Segment profit(1)                  |  |           | 632.6   |               |   | 106.5          |  |               | 143.4   |              |   | 145.1           |  |      
|Depreciation and amortization      |  |           | 1,811.2 |               |   | 570.7          |  |               | 76.0    |              |   | 17.3            |  |      
|Expenditures for long-lived assets |  |           | 1,113.0 |               |   | 265.2          |  |               | 131.8   |              |   | 53.3            |  |      
|Total assets(4)                    |  |           | 7,800.7 |               |   | 3,060.5        |  |               | 805.2   |              |   | 301.1           |  |      

---

F-69

---

The
reconciliation of combined segment profit to net (loss) is as follows:

|                        |                                             | Year Ended December 31, |         
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | --------
|
|
|
|Combined segment profit |                                             | $                       | 1,199.1 
|Add (deduct):           |                                             |                         |         
|                        | Asset impairments                           |                         |         
|                        | Non-cash compensation                       |                         |         
|                        | Other charges                               |                         |         
|                        | Depreciation                                |                         |         
|                        | Amortization                                |                         |         
|                        | Interest income and other, net              |                         |         
|                        | Interest (expense)                          |                         |         
|                        | Shares of (losses) from equity investments  |                         |         
|                        | Other (losses)                              |                         |         
|                        | Foreign currency transaction (losses) gains |                         |         
|                        | Recapitalization expense                    |                         |         
|                        | Income tax benefit (expense)                |                         |         
|                        |                                             |                         |         
|                        |                                             |                         | (2,153.3
|                        |                                             |                         |         
|Net (loss)              |                                             | $                       | (954.2  
|                        |                                             |                         |         

Geographic information

|                  |  | United
States |       | United
Kingdom |   | Ireland  |  | Total
|----------------- |  | ------------- | ----- | -------------- | - | -------- |  | -----
|
|2003              |  |               |       |                |   |          |  |      
|Revenues          |  | $             |      |                | $ | 3,526.7  |  | $    
|Long-lived assets |  |               | 2.3   |                |   | 9,557.3  |  |      
|2002              |  |               |       |                |   |          |  |      
|Revenues          |  | $             |      |                | $ | 3,175.1  |  | $    
|Long-lived assets |  |               | 163.6 |                |   | 11,569.2 |  |      
|2001              |  |               |       |                |   |          |  |      
|Revenues          |  | $             |      |                | $ | 3,127.3  |  | $    
|Long-lived assets |  |               | 151.3 |                |   | 11,703.5 |  |      

F-70

---



NTL INCORPORATED        SCHEDULE ICONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT        CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS        (in millions, except share data)

|                                                                                           |                                                                                                                                                 | December 31,                         |        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | -------
|
|
|Assets                                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |        
|Current assets                                                                             |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |        
|                                                                                           | Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                                       |                                      | $      
|                                                                                           | Marketable securities                                                                                                                           |                                      |        
|                                                                                           | Other current assets                                                                                                                            |                                      |        
|                                                                                           |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |        
|                                                                                           |                                                                                                                                                 | Total current assets                 |        
|Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $2.2 (2002)                               |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |       
|Investments in and loans to affiliates, net                                                |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      | 3,607.3
|Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $nil (2003) and $102.0 (2002) |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |       
|                                                                                           |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |        
|Total assets                                                                               |                                                                                                                                                 | $                                    | 3,726.8
|                                                                                           |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |        
|Liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit)                                             |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |        
|Liabilities not subject to compromise:                                                     |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |        
|Current liabilities                                                                        |                                                                                                                                                 | $                                    | 28.8   
|Long-term debt                                                                             |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |       
|Liabilities subject to compromise                                                          |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |       
|Shareholders' equity (deficit)                                                             |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |        
|                                                                                           | Series preferred stock$.01 par value; authorized 5,000,000 (2003) and none (2002) shares; issued and outstanding none                          |                                      |        
|                                                                                           | Common stock$.01 par value; authorized 400,000,000 (2003) and 100 (2002) shares; issued and outstanding 86,916,614 (2003) and 13 (2002) shares |                                      |        
|                                                                                           | Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                                      |                                      |        
|                                                                                           | Unearned stock compensation                                                                                                                     |                                      |        
|                                                                                           | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)                                                                                                   |                                      |        
|                                                                                           | (Deficit)                                                                                                                                       |                                      |        
|                                                                                           |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |        
|                                                                                           |                                                                                                                                                 | Total shareholders' equity (deficit) |        
|                                                                                           |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |        
|Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit)                                       |                                                                                                                                                 | $                                    | 3,726.8
|                                                                                           |                                                                                                                                                 |                                      |        

See
accompanying notes.

F-71

---



NTL INCORPORATED        CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT        STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS        (in millions)

|                                                                    |                                                          | Year ended December 31, |       
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ------
|
|
|Costs and expenses                                                  |                                                          |                         |       
|                                                                    | General and administrative expenses                      |                         | $     
|                                                                    | Non-cash compensation                                    |                         |       
|                                                                    | Other charges                                            |                         |       
|                                                                    | Depreciation                                             |                         |       
|                                                                    | Amortization                                             |                         |       
|                                                                    |                                                          |                         |       
|Operating (loss)                                                    |                                                          |                         | (46.6 
|Other income (expense)                                              |                                                          |                         |       
|                                                                    | Interest income and other, net                           |                         |       
|                                                                    | Interest expense (contractual interest of $831.3 (2002)) |                         |       
|                                                                    | Recapitalization expense                                 |                         |       
|                                                                    | Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)              |                         |       
|                                                                    |                                                          |                         |       
|(Loss) before income taxes and equity in net (loss) of subsidiaries |                                                          |                         | (154.7
|Income tax (expense) benefit                                        |                                                          |                         | (1.6  
|                                                                    |                                                          |                         |       
|(Loss) before equity in net (loss) of subsidiaries                  |                                                          |                         | (156.3
|Equity in net (loss) of subsidiaries                                |                                                          |                         | (797.9
|                                                                    |                                                          |                         |       
|Net (loss)                                                          |                                                          | $                       | (954.2
|                                                                    |                                                          |                         |       

|                                          |  | January 1,
2003 |        
|----------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | -------
|
|Gain on debt discharge                    |  | $               | 7,322.8
|Fresh-start adoptionfixed assets         |  |                 | (0.8   
|Recapitalization expense                  |  |                 | (8.0   
|Share of (losses) from equity investments |  |                 | (511.3 
|                                          |  |                 |        
|Net income                                |  | $               | 6,802.7
|                                          |  |                 |        

See
accompanying notes.

F-72

---



NTL INCORPORATED        CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT        STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS        (in millions)

|                                                                 |                                                  | Year ended December 31,                   |       
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------- | ------
|
|
|Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities              |                                                  | $                                         | (189.2
|Investing activities                                             |                                                  |                                           |       
|                                                                 | Purchase of fixed assets                         |                                           |       
|                                                                 | Purchase of marketable securities                |                                           |       
|                                                                 | Proceeds from sales of marketable securities     |                                           |       
|                                                                 | Investments in and loans to affiliates           |                                           |       
|                                                                 | Loan to NTL Europe, Inc.                         |                                           |       
|                                                                 |                                                  |                                           |       
|                                                                 |                                                  | Net cash (used in) investing activities   |       
|                                                                 |                                                  |                                           |       
|Financing activities                                             |                                                  |                                           |       
|                                                                 | Distribution to NTL (Delaware), Inc.             |                                           |       
|                                                                 | Contribution from NTL (Delaware), Inc.           |                                           |       
|                                                                 | Proceeds from borrowings, net of financing costs |                                           |       
|                                                                 | Net proceeds from rights offering                |                                           |       
|                                                                 | Proceeds from exercise of stock options          |                                           |       
|                                                                 | Principal payments on long-term debt             |                                           |       
|                                                                 |                                                  |                                           |       
|                                                                 |                                                  | Net cash provided by financing activities |       
|                                                                 |                                                  |                                           |       
|(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents                 |                                                  |                                           | (182.4
|Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period                   |                                                  |                                           | 295.2 
|                                                                 |                                                  |                                           |       
|Cash and cash equivalents, end of period                         |                                                  | $                                         | 112.8 
|                                                                 |                                                  |                                           |       
|Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information                 |                                                  |                                           |       
|Cash paid for interest                                           |                                                  | $                                         | 47.3  
|Income taxes paid                                                |                                                  |                                           |      
|Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities           |                                                  |                                           |       
|Conversion of notes, net of unamortized deferred financing costs |                                                  | $                                         |      
|Contribution from NTL (Delaware), Inc.                           |                                                  |                                           |      

|                                               |  | January 1,
2003 |       
|---------------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | ------
|
|Net cash (used in) operating activities        |  | $               | (69.7 
|Net cash provided by investing activities      |  |                 | (171.3
|Net cash provided by financing activities      |  |                 | 500.0 
|                                               |  |                 |       
|Increase in cash and cash equivalents          |  |                 | 259.0 
|Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |  |                 | 36.2  
|                                               |  |                 |       
|Cash and cash equivalents, end of period       |  | $               | 295.2 
|                                               |  |                 |       

See
accompanying notes.

F-73

---



NTL INCORPORATED        NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF REGISTRANT

1.     Corporate Restructuring

On May 8, 2002, NTL Incorporated (then known as NTL Communications Corp.), (the "Company") NTL Europe, Inc. (then known as NTL Incorporated) and
certain of the Company's and NTL Europe, Inc.'s subsidiaries filed a pre-arranged joint reorganization plan (the "Plan") under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. The Company's
operating subsidiaries and those of NTL Europe, Inc. were not included in the Chapter 11 filing. The Plan became effective on January 10, 2003, at which time the Company emerged from
Chapter 11 reorganization.

Pursuant
to the Plan, the entity formerly known as NTL Incorporated and its subsidiaries and affiliates were split into two separate groups, and the Company and NTL Europe, Inc.
each emerged as independent public companies. The entity formerly known as NTL Communications Corp. was renamed "NTL Incorporated" and became the holding company for the former NTL group's principal
UK and Ireland assets. Prior to consummation of the Plan, the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the entity then known as NTL Incorporated, which, pursuant to the Plan, was renamed "NTL
Europe, Inc." and which became the holding company for the former NTL group's continental European and certain other assets. Pursuant to the Plan, all of the outstanding securities of the
Company's former ultimate parent company (NTL Europe) and certain of its subsidiaries, including the Company, were cancelled, and the Company issued shares of its common stock and Series A
warrants and NTL Europe, Inc. issued shares of its common stock and preferred stock to various former creditors and stockholders of the Company's former ultimate parent company and its
subsidiaries, including the Company. The precise mix of new securities received by holders of each particular type of security of the Company's former ultimate parent company and its subsidiaries was
set forth in the Plan. The outstanding notes of Diamond Holdings Limited and NTL (Triangle) LLC were not cancelled and remain outstanding.

2.     Basis of Presentation

In the Company's condensed financial statements, the Company's investment in subsidiaries is stated at cost plus equity in the undistributed earnings of the
subsidiaries. The Company's share of net loss of its subsidiaries is included in net loss using the equity method of accounting. The condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the Company's consolidated financial statements.

F-74

---

3.     Liabilities Subject to Compromise

Liabilities subject to compromise consist of the following (in millions):

|                                |                                                        | December 31,
2002
|------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------
|
|Accounts payable                |                                                        | $                
|Interest payable                |                                                        |                  
|Payable to NTL (Delaware), Inc. |                                                        |                  
|Accrued expenses                |                                                        |                  
|Long-term debt:                 |                                                        |                  
|NTL Communications:             |                                                        |                  
|                                | 123/4% Senior Deferred Coupon Notes                    |                  
|                                | 111/2% Senior Deferred Coupon Notes                    |                  
|                                | 10% Senior Notes                                       |                  
|                                | 91/2% Senior Sterling Notes, less unamortized discount |                  
|                                | 103/4% Senior Deferred Coupon Sterling Notes           |                  
|                                | 93/4% Senior Deferred Coupon Notes                     |                  
|                                | 93/4% Senior Deferred Coupon Sterling Notes            |                  
|                                | 111/2% Senior Notes                                    |                  
|                                | 123/8% Senior Deferred Coupon Notes                    |                  
|                                | 7% Convertible Subordinated Notes                      |                  
|                                | 91/4% Senior Euro Notes                                |                  
|                                | 97/8% Senior Euro Notes                                |                  
|                                | 111/2% Senior Deferred Coupon Euro Notes               |                  
|                                | 117/8% Senior Notes, less unamortized discount         |                  
|                                | 123/8% Senior Euro Notes, plus unamortized premium     |                  
|                                | 63/4% Convertible Senior Notes                         |                  
|                                |                                                        |                  
|                                |                                                        | $                
|                                |                                                        |                  

Upon
emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization and in accordance with the Plan, all of the outstanding public notes of the Company were canceled.

4.     Long-Term Debt

Outstanding Public Notes

Upon emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization and in accordance with the Plan, all of the outstanding public notes of NTL Communications Corp. were canceled.

During
2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company recognized $14.2 million, $96.7 million and $243.5 million, respectively, of original issue discount as interest expense.

In
connection with the Company's emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries issued $558.249 million aggregate principal face amount of
19% Senior Secured Notes due 2010 (the "Exit Notes") on January 10, 2003. Initial purchasers of the Company's Exit Notes also purchased 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock on that
date. The gross

F-75

---

proceeds
from the sale of the Exit Notes and such shares totaled $500.0 million. The proceeds were used in part to repay amounts outstanding under the DIP facility and to purchase from NTL
Delaware a £90.0 million note of NTL (UK) Group Inc. and to repay certain other obligations. The Exit Notes were due on January 1, 2010. The Exit Notes were redeemable
at the Company's option after January 10, 2003. Interest on the Exit Notes was payable in cash semiannually from July 1, 2003, with respect to the interest payment due on July 1,
2003, the Company elected to pay the interest by issuance of additional "pay-in-kind" notes. The Company issued $56.1 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of
Exit Notes with primarily the same terms as the original Exit Notes for the interest payment.

The
Exit Notes were repaid on November 17, 2003 following completion of the Company's rights offering.

5.     Leases

Leases for office space end in 2004. Total rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 under operating leases was
$1.1 million, $1.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively.

Future
minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases as of December 31, 2003 are $0.7 million (2004).

6.     Other

On the Effective Date, the Company loaned Communications Cable Funding Corp., (a wholly-owned subsidiary), $160.6 million for the repayment of debt to NTL
Delaware, Inc. The loan is payable on
demand. Interest is payable on demand at a rate of 5.28516% per annum and will be increased to 15% per annum.

In
addition, on the Effective Date, the Company acquired the public debt of Diamond Cable Communications Limited aggregating $1,373.1 million (including interest of
$136.5 million). On February 4, 2003, the Company released Diamond Cable Communications Limited from its obligations under these notes.

On
September 28, 2001, the Company loaned NTL Europe, Inc. $150.0 million in cash and received 15.0% Promissory Notes due September 30, 2004. Interest is
payable monthly in cash at a rate of 15.0% per year beginning on October 31, 2001. Upon emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization and in accordance with the Plan, these notes were cancelled.

No
cash dividends were paid to the registrant by subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.

F-76

---



NTL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE IIVALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

|Col. A                          |  | Col. B |       | Col. C |   | Col. D |  | Col. E
|------------------------------- |  | ------ | ----- | ------ | - | ------ |  | ------
|
|
|Reorganized Company             |  |        |       |        |   |        |  |       
|Year ended December 31, 2003    |  |        |       |        |   |        |  |       
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | $      |      |        | $ | 27.4   |  | $     
|                                |  |        |       |        |   |        |  |       
|Predecessor Company             |  |        |       |        |   |        |  |       
|Year ended December 31, 2002    |  |        |       |        |   |        |  |       
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | $      | 126.1 |        | $ | 55.2   |  | $     
|                                |  |        |       |        |   |        |  |       
|Year ended December 31, 2001    |  |        |       |        |   |        |  |       
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | $      | 135.2 |        | $ | 58.3   |  | $     
|                                |  |        |       |        |   |        |  |       

---

F-77

---

QuickLinks