T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GE OF F R E Y WI L S ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. J A M E S T I L T O N ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 55032 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 8 -cv -0 2 4 5 4 -JV S -JC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J a m e s V . S e l na , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 16, 2013 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , IK U T A , an dW A T F O R D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F orm e rC a l i f

orni as t a t e pr i s one rG e of f r e yW i l s on appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm enti n h i s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on al l egi ng , am on g o ther thi ngs , vi ol a t i ons of

hi s c ons t i tut i ona l r i ghtt o a de qua t e de nt a l c ar e . W e ha ve ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o ad is m is s a l f o rf a ilu r e to 

# FI LED APR23 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 55032 2 e x h au s t a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s a n df o rc le are rr o ra n yu n d e r ly in g f a c tu a l f in d in g s . W y at t v . T e rhune , 3 1 5 F .3 d1 1 0 8 , 1 1 1 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e a f f irm . Th e d i s tr i c tc o u rtp r o p e r l yd i s mi s s e dW i l s o n ’ s Ei g h th A me n d me n tc l a i ms agai nstdefe nd ant s F arber- S ze kreni , K uykend al l , and A shl eyw i tho utprej ud i ce be c aus e W i l s on f

a i l e d pr ope r l yt o e xhaus thi s a dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e m e di e s be f or e f i l i ng s ui t , a nd he f

a i l e d t o pr ovi de s uf

f i c i e nte vi de nc e t o s how tha ta dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e m e d ie s w e r e e f

f e c tiv e lyu n a v a ilab le to h im . Se e W oodf ord v . N go , 548 U . S . 81, 85 , 93 -95 (20 06 ) ( ho l di ng that“ prop erexhaust i on ” i s m andat ory and re qu i re s a d h e r e n c e to a d m in is tr a tiv e p r o c e du r a l ru le s ) ; Sa p p v . Kim b r e ll , 623 F . 3d 813, 826 ( 9th C i r . 2010) ( a dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e m e di e s a r e “ a va i l abl e ” w he r e a dm i ni s tr a t i ve ap p e a ls a r e s c r e e n e df

o rp r o p e rr e a s o n s ) . W e do n otconsi der W i l son’ s other c l ai m s bec ause W i l son h as no tra i se d th e m o n ap p e a l. See W i lcox v . C om m ’r , 848 F . 2d 1007, 1008 n. 2 ( 9th C i r . 1988) (argum ent s notra i se d o n app ea l by pro se l i t i gantdeem ed abando ned). T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g W ils o n le a v e to f ile aS e c o n dA m e n d e dC o m p la in t w h e r e a m e n d m e n t w o u ldh a v e b e e n f u tile . See G ordon v . C i t

yof O akland , 62 7 F . 3d 10 92 , 10 94 (9th C i r. 20 10 ).12- 55032 3 W ils o n ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt f a ile dto a d d r e s s h is E ig h th A m endm entcl ai m agai nstdefe nd antA shl eyi s unp er suas i ve because the di stri ct c o u rt d is m is s e dth e c la im f o rf a ilu r e to e x h au s t a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s . D e f e nda nt s ’ m ot i on t o augm e ntthe appe l l a t e r e c or d, f i l e d on A ugus t8, 2 0 1 2 , is g r a n te d . D e f e n d a n ts ’ m o tio n to ta k e ju d ic ia l n o tic e , f ile do n A u g u s t 8 , 2 0 1 2 , is d e n ie da s u n n e c e s s a ry . W i l so n ’ s o p p o sedm o t i o n t o au g m en tth e ap p el l at e reco rd , fi l edo n A u g u st 23, 2012, i s gr a nt e d. A F F I R M E D .