alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:     August
      14,  2009
              By:
              /s/ Guy De VreeseName:  Guy
      De VreeseTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer
                (Principal Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Remedent, Inc. and will be retained by
Remedent, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23a

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We have audited the consolidated  financial statements of Starcraft  Corporation
and  Subsidiaries  as of September 29, 1996 and for the year then ended and have
issued our report  thereon dated  November 7, 1996.  Our audit also included the
information  for the year ended  September 29, 1996 in the  financial  statement
schedule  listed  in  Item  14 of  this  Annual  Report.  This  schedule  is the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audit.

In our  opinion,  the  financial  statement  schedule  referred  to above,  when
considered  in  relation  to the basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material  respects the information as of and for the year
ended September 29, 1996 set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  33-73148)  pertaining to the Starcraft  Automotive  Corporation  401(k)
Profit Sharing Plan and Trust and in the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.
33-70030)  pertaining to the Starcraft  Automotive  Corporation  Stock Incentive
Plan of our report  dated  November 7, 1996,  with  respect to the  consolidated
financial statements of Starcraft  Corporation and Subsidiaries included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 29, 1996.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Fort Wayne, Indiana
December 20, 1996
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Key Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David M. Camp, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/  David M. Camp


David M. Camp


President and Chief Executive Officer


December 10, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.83.2
                                                                 ---------------

DATE:    March 15, 2001

TO:      Bob Buchanan

FR:      Kenneth M. Cohen

RE:      Increased Retention Plan Cash Bonus Opportunity

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As you know, under the Company's retention plan you have been entitled to
receive a cash retention bonus if the Company or its animal health business is
sold and you remain employed by the company at the time of the sale.

At its February 14, 2001 meeting, the Board of Directors decided to increase
your potential cash bonus benefit from the retention plan by doubling the amount
you would receive, including a doubling of the minimum payment from 37.5% to
75%. This recognizes your contributions to date, the value you are expected to
create for the shareholders in continuing to work toward a sale, and the
diminution in the expected value of the stock option component of the retention
plan.

Whether or not you have a written employment agreement, please note that (except
to the extent expressly provided in a written employment agreement) the Company
and you each retain the right to unilaterally terminate the employment
relationship at any time, for any reason or for no reason; neither the original
retention plan nor this augmentation of it changes that.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices 

# Order

July 22, 2011

143304-5

_____________ _______________ _____________

SC: 143304 In re RIDLING/RIDLING-FOSTER/FOSTER, COA: 299729 Minors. Oakland CC Family Division: 08-752006-NA

________________ _______________ __________

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v

KARRI RIDLING-FOSTER, Respondent-Appellant,

and

ARTHUR FOSTER, Respondent.

________________ _______________ __________/

SC: 143305 In re RIDLING-FOSTER/FOSTER, Minors. COA: 299730 Oakland CC Family Division:

___________________ _____________________ 08-752006-NA

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v

KARRI RIDLING-FOSTER, Respondent-Appellant,

and

ARTHUR FOSTER, Respondent.

_____________ _______________ _____________/I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 22, 2011

h0719 2

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 2, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-1130 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EMPLOYMENT 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and GERMANY 

Signed at Washington November 30, 2011 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
GERMANY 

Employment 

 Agreement signed at Washington 

 November 30, 2011; 

 Entered into force November 30, 2011.
127 STAT. 552 PUBLIC LAW 113–42—OCT. 4, 2013 

Public Law 113–42 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the period during which Iraqis who were employed by the United States 

Government in Iraq may be granted special immigrant status and to temporarily 

increase the fee or surcharge for processing machine-readable nonimmigrant visas. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT-TERM EXTENSION OF SPECIAL IMMIGRANT PROGRAM. 

Section 1244(c)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2008 (8 U.S.C. 1157 note) is amended by adding 

at the end the following: 

‘‘(C) FISCAL YEAR 2014.— 

‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in clauses 

(ii) and (iii), the total number of principal aliens who 

may be provided special immigrant status under this 

section during the first 3 months of fiscal year 2014 

shall be the sum of— 

‘‘(I) the number of aliens described in subsection (b) whose application for special immigrant 

status under this section is pending on September 

30, 2013; and 

‘‘(II) 2,000. 

‘‘(ii) EMPLOYMENT PERIOD.—The 1-year period 

during which the principal alien is required to have 

been employed by or on behalf of the United States 

Government in Iraq under subsection (b)(1)(B) shall 

begin on or after March 20, 2003, and end on or before 

September 30, 2013. 

‘‘(iii) APPLICATION DEADLINE.—The principal alien 

seeking special immigrant status under this subparagraph shall apply to the Chief of Mission in accordance 

with subsection (b)(4) not later than December 31, 

2013.’’. 

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY FEE INCREASE FOR CERTAIN CONSULAR SERVICES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 

the Secretary of State, not later than January 1, 2014, shall increase 

the fee or surcharge authorized under section 140(a) of the Foreign 

Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public 

Law 103–236; 8 U.S.C. 1351 note) by $1 for processing machinereadable nonimmigrant visas and machine-readable combined 

border crossing identification cards and nonimmigrant visas. 

8 USC 1351 note. 

Oct. 4, 2013 

[H.R. 3233] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC LAW 113–42—OCT. 4, 2013 127 STAT. 553 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3233 (S. 1566): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013): 

Oct. 2, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

(b) DEPOSIT OF AMOUNTS.—Notwithstanding section 140(a)(2) 

of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 

1995 (Public Law 103–236; 8 U.S.C. 1351 note), the additional 

amount collected pursuant the fee increase authorized under subsection (a) shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury. 

(c) SUNSET PROVISION.—The fee increase authorized under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date that is 2 years after the 

first date on which such increased fee is collected. 

Approved October 4, 2013. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20093 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TROY EUGENE CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-552-1

-------------------- October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Troy Eugene Clark appeals his conviction and sentence after his bench-trial conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 921(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Clark’s challenges to his conviction are based on the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Clark concedes that his arguments are foreclosed and that they are being raised to preserve them for possible further review. Clark’s arguments challenging his conviction are indeed foreclosed. See UnitedNo. 02-20093 -2- States v. Daugherty , 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002); United States v. Gresham , 118 F.3d 258, 264-65 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Kuban , 94 F.3d 971, 973 (5th Cir. 1996); and United States v. Rawls , 85 F.3d 240, 242-43 (5th Cir. 1996). Clark also challenges his sentence on the ground that the district court impermissibly delegated its payment-setting authority to the Probation Office. Clark did not object to the cost-payment conditions at sentencing; accordingly, we review the claim for plain error. See United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). Clark has failed to establish plain error. See United States v. Warden , 291 F.3d 363, 365-66 (5th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, Clark’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
General Shale GENERAL SHALE BRICK, INC. Brick=-===-= P.O. Box 3547, Johnson City, TN 37602 Ph. (423) 282-4661 I FAX (423) 952-4160 

www.generalshale.com 

Building The American Dream• 

GREGORY A. BOWLES 

Director of Environment 

CERTIFIED MAIL 

7009 2820 0002 6271 7906 

Mr. JeffTelander 

U.S. EPA Mailroom (D243-02) 

January 21, 2011 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Subject: Requirement to provide information according to Title 42 of the United States Code, 

Chapter 85, Subchapter I, Part A, Section 7414 (42 U.S.C 7414) 

Dear Mr. Telander: 

This letter is in response to the letter from Mr. Peter Tsirigotis dated November 17, 2010 

requesting stack testing at four of our plant locations per the above citation. 

Due to economic conditions, many of our facilities are not currently in operation. Of the 

four plant locations that have been requested to perform the ICR emissions testing, only the 

Coosa, GA location B-Kiln is currently in operation and available for testing. This testing has 

been scheduled. 

We are hereby requesting a waiver on testing of the following synthetic minor source 

kilns for which we already have existing testing data and have no plans to operate in the near future: 

• Fairdale, KY tunnel kiln tk-2 (Tested 12115/2005 for PM, HCI, HF, & S02) 

• Mooresville, IN tunnel kiln tk-2 (Tested 01 /24/2007 for PM, HCI, HF, S02 & NOx) 

Our Mooresville, IN tunnel kiln tk-1 is permanently closed and has been dismantled. This 

kiln has been removed from the permit. 
JeffTelander 

Page2 

The following two kilns are not currently in operation due to the depressed economy: 

• Mooresville, IN tunnel kiln tk-3 

• Spring City, TN tunnel kiln tk-1 

We will comply with the information request for these two plants as they are brought 

back into operation. The timetable for this will depend on improved market conditions and 

demand for their products. 

If you have questions or need further information, please contact Martha West, 

Environn1ental Engineer at (423) 952-4240 or by email at martha.west@generalshale.com 

cc: Mr. Peter Tsirigotis, U.S. EPA 

,_,, 

Wienerberger. A Wienerberger Company 

Sincerely, 

Gregory A. Bowles 

Director of Environment 

General Shale Brick, Inc.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Remedent  USA,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robin  List,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant to   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/  Robin  List
----------------
Robin  List
Chief  Executive  Officer
November  13,  2002

<PAGE>
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-217 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

Earth Sciences 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and KUWAIT 

Signed at Reston February 17, 2011 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
KUWAIT 

Scientific Cooperation: Earth Sciences 

 Memorandum of understanding signed 

 at Reston February 17, 2011; 

 Entered into force February 17, 2011. 

 With annexes. 

 



NOTE: This Memorandum of Understanding signed only in Reston.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

FEDERAL CORPORATION, INC., 

Appellant,

v.

DESIREE TRUHLAR, CARLOS 

ALVAREZ, ROSENDO AGUILAR, 

JENNIFER BUTLER, MARIA T. RUIZ, 

AUDEN TERCERO, LUCIA 

CERECERES, ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ, 

PRISCILLA RODRIGUEZ and LIBERTY 

MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE 

CORPORATION, 

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00095-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law #3

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2014DRCV1401)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellees

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., McClure, C.J. (Senior Judge), and Hughes, J.

McClure, C.J. (Senior Judge)(Sitting by Assignment)

Hughes, J. (Not Participating)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27190]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-131-005]


Overthrust Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

October 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 2, 1997, Overthrust Pipeline Company 
(Overthrust) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, the below-listed tariff sheets, to be effective 
November 1, 1997:

Original Sheet No. 61A and 78D
First Revised Sheet Nos. 34A, 67C, 78A, 78B and 78C
Second Revised Sheet Nos. 33, 35A, 60, 61, 67A, 67B and 78
Third Revised Sheet Nos. 1, 34 and 67
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 30

    Overthrust states that the filing is being made in compliance with 
the September 26, 1997, OPR Director Letter Order in Docket No. RP97-
131-002.
    Overthrust states that the proposed tariff sheets implement the 
requirements of Order No. 587-C and comply with the Commission's 
September 26 directive to (1) correct a typographical error in Standard 
2.3.31 and (2) revise the tariff language that incorporates GISB 
Standard 2.3.9.
    Overthrust states further that a copy of this filing has been 
served upon its customers and the Wyoming Public Service Commission.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests should 
be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27190 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Multi-Lane Roundabout
#### SOUTHEAST TITLE AND INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Russell W. HASTINGS, Juliana Hastings, Johanna Delburn and Anny A. Gleason, jointly and severally, Appellees.

Nos. 70-40 and 70-114.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 17, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1970.

James C. Paine, John R. Beranek and Paul C. Wolfe of Jones, Adams, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Larry Klein of Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, McKeown & Dell, West Palm Beach, for appellees Hastings.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN, J., concur.

WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

WALDEN, Judge

(dissenting).

I am satisfied that from the record there are facts and inferences which point up *106genuine issues of material fact. This being so, summary judgment procedure was improperly employed and I would reverse. There was an issue as to whether the Rambler automobile in question was covered under the terms of the policy. More specifically, there are issues as to whether the Rambler was a replacement for the Falcon, whether the Falcon was inoperable and whether required notice of acquisition was given to the company.

I respectfully dissent and would reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-03307 and File No. 333-28849) and Form S-8
(File No. 333-194211) of RFS Hotel Investors, Inc. of our report dated January
24, 2001, except for Note 9 as to which the date is February 20, 2001, relating
to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in
this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Dallas, Texas
MARCH 13, 2001
No. 00-7122.

#### Powell *v.*Carey, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements of
ProxyMed, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-77793 (as amended by
amendments no. 1 and 2), 333-58311, 333-11179, 333-34645 and 33-95454) and Forms
S-8 (File Nos. 333-04717 and 333-50391) of our report dated February 19, 1999,
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of ProxyMed, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,
and for each of the three years ended December 31, 1998 which report is included
in this annual report on Form 10-K, (as amended by amendments no. 1 and 2).



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Miami, Florida
July 21, 1999