alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

DECISION

DATED AND FILED

June 30, 2022

Sheila T. Reiff

Clerk of Court of Appeals

NOTICE

This opinion is subject to further editing. If 

published, the official version will appear in 

the bound volume of the Official Reports. 

A party may file with the Supreme Court a 

petition to review an adverse decision by the 

Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and 

RULE 809.62. 

Appeal No. 2021AP2220 Cir. Ct. No. 2021SC5936

STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT IV

BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN,

 PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

 V.

ROBIN LAVANCE PERKINS,

 DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: 

VALERIE BAILEY-RIHN, Judge. Affirmed. 

¶1 FITZPATRICK, J.1 Robin Perkins formerly leased an apartment

from the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin (“the Board”). The Board 

brought an action to evict Perkins from that apartment in small claims court in Dane 

County. I think that Perkins wants to appeal an order of the circuit court concerning 

 

1

 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(a) (2019-20). 

All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted.
No. 2021AP2220

2

that eviction. But, Perkins’ notice of appeal and briefing in this court are such that

it is impossible to determine what Perkins wants this court to do and the basis for 

Perkins’ request on appeal. Luckily, the Board’s response brief explains the events 

in the circuit court, and I summarize those now. 

¶2 The Board filed an eviction action to remove Perkins from an 

apartment owned by the Board. Perkins did not appear at the eviction hearing, and 

a default judgment was entered against Perkins. Perkins filed two motions in the 

circuit court that the court construed either as a motion to reopen the judgment or 

for relief from judgment under WIS. STAT. § 806.07. Both motions were denied by 

the circuit court. 

¶3 It is hard to tell anything about what Perkins requests as relief in this 

appeal. Perkins’ brief-in-chief and reply brief are a jumble of words with nothing 

that approaches a discernable argument. Wisconsin appellate courts grant some 

leniency to pro se litigants, like Perkins, in regard to briefing. Waushara Cnty. v. 

Graf, 166 Wis. 2d 442, 452, 480 N.W.2d 16 (1992). However, a pro se litigant still 

has to make a recognizable argument as to why a decision of the circuit court should 

be reversed. See id. Perkins has not done so in this appeal. 

¶4 For those reasons Perkins’ appeal is rejected, and the order of the 

circuit court is affirmed.

By the Court.—Order affirmed.

This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT.

RULE 809.23(1)(b)4.
Exhibit 10.18

NTL INCORPORATED  909 Third Avenue  New York, New York 10022

22nd
December 2004

Mr. Rick
Martin
Rundle House
Charters Road
Sunningdale
SL5 9QD

Confirmation of Amendment of Employment Agreement dated as of 4th March 2003 (the "Agreement")

Dear
Rick:

As
we have discussed, now that NTL Incorporated (the "Company") has emerged from its Chapter 11 reorganisation and has successfully completed its $1.4 billion equity offering and multibillion
bond and credit agreement financings, it is entering into a new phase of its existence. The Company therefore has new initiatives and projects which require the reshaping of the management team. In
particular, as we previously agreed, on 30th June 2004 we assigned you as Project Director of the Broadcast sale process and you have been leading the team in this role as of that date.

The
employment term under your Agreement expires on 30th June 2005 (the "Termination Date") and we have discussed together your own plans and the Company's plans on a going forward basis.

This
letter confirms our prior agreement that your Employment Term under the Agreement will not be renewed and your employment with the Company will terminate on the Termination Date. (Terms not
otherwise defined in this Letter are used as defined in the Agreement.)

---



*******

Please
acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by executing a copy of this Letter in the space provided below.

| |  | Sincerely,        
| |  | ------------------
| |  | NTL INCORPORATED  
| |  | By                
| |  | Name:             
| |  | Title:            
| |  |                   
| |  | AGREED & ACCEPTED:
| |  |                   
| |  |                   

---



QuickLinks
II 

Calendar No. 603 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3544 

To designate the visitor and education center at Fort McHenry National 

Monument and Historic Shrine as the ‘‘Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and 

Education Center’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Reported by Mr. MANCHIN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the visitor and education center at Fort 

McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine as 

the ‘‘Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and Education Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PAUL S. SARBANES VISITOR 

4 AND EDUCATION CENTER. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The visitor and education center 

6 at Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3544 RS

1 located at 2400 East Fort Ave, Baltimore, Maryland, is 

2 designated as the ‘‘Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and Edu3 cation Center’’. 

4 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg5 ulation, document, paper, or other document of the United 

6 States to the visitor center referred to in subsection (a) 

7 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Paul S. Sarbanes 

8 Visitor and Education Center’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 603 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3544 

A BILL 

To designate the visitor and education center at 

Education Center’’. Shrine as the ‘‘Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Edwin E. BRABETZ and Bertha Brabetz, his wife, Appellants, v. Delores STRANGE, D. A. Boucher and Esther R. Boucher, his wife, et al., Appellees.

No. 78-321.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 31, 1978.

Barry G. Roderman of Barry G. Roder-man & Associates, P. A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Peter N. Hanna, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee, Massi.

Abraham B. Rosenberg, Hollywood, for appellees, Strange and Boucher.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

*550DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.

DOWNEY, C. J., concurs specially, with opinion.

DOWNEY, Chief Judge,

concurring specially:

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an order of abatement.

Almost everything said in the briefs regarding what transpired in the court below is de hors the record because we have no record or appendix. Thus, an affirmance is required and ordinarily no opinion would be justified. However, we glean from the briefs that the trial court entered an order abating or continuing this case in the trial court until a decision is rendered in the case of *Franklin*v. *White Egret Condominium,*358 So.2d 1084, pending in this Court. We would assume that either the trial judge or one of the parties, or both, felt a decision in *White Egret*would assist in the decision of this case. But obviously appellants, as the plaintiffs below, object to the abatement or continuance of their case awaiting the eventual outcome of *White Egret*and I think they were justified in their objection.

Where one of the parties to pending litigation objects, I do not believe the trial court has the authority, absent some very compelling circumstance (which I am unable to articulate), to abate or continue the case awaiting a decision in another case involving different parties.

Accordingly, I concur in the decision to affirm because the record is inadequate to reach the merits of the appeal.
Exhibit 31.2 

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Gino M. Pereira, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Technest Holdings, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. 

**Date:  May 23, 2005**

** /s/ Gino M. Pereira**

**Gino M. Pereira**

**Chief Financial Officer**
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                               AGEMARK CORPORATION

             STATEMENT CONCERNING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                                    --------------------------
                                                                       2003            2002
                                                                    ---------        ---------
<S>                                                                 <C>              <C>
Common shares issued and outstanding beginning of fiscal year       1,109,481        1,000,000

Shares cancelled due to inability to contact 10/1/01                                   -54,393

Shares cancelled due to inability to contact 6/1/02                                    -19,825

Shares abandoned at 6/1/02                                                              -4,050

Shares issued 6/1/02 on exercise of options                                            187,749

Weighted average common shares outstanding for period               1,109,481          963,815
</TABLE>
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo20836 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
PUBLIC SCOPING COMMENT PERIOD OPENS FOR THE WALLOPS ISLAND 

CAUSEWAY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, ACCOMACK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), in cooperation with the Federal 

Highway Administration (FHWA), is initiating an Environmental Assessment (EA) that will 

evaluate potential impacts associated with replacement of the Wallops Island Causeway Bridge 

over Cat Creek at Goddard Space Flight Center’s Wallops Flight Facility, in Accomack County, 

VA. The EA is being prepared to satisfy both NASA’s and FHWA’s obligations under the 

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and will also serve as a means for ensuring 

compliance with a variety of other Federal statutes, including the Endangered Species Act, 

National Historic Preservation Act, Coastal Zone Management Act, Clean Water Act, and the 

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The EA is being tiered from the 

July 2019 Wallops Site-wide Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Site-wide PEIS). 

The Site-wide PEIS, which is available at https://code200-external.gsfc.nasa.gov/250-wff/sitewide_eis, analyzed the potential environmental impacts associated with various institutional 

support activities including the causeway bridge replacement. 

The existing bridge was constructed in 1959 and is approaching the end of its anticipated service 

life. It is 1,284 feet long, 27 feet wide, and has a cast-in-place concrete deck supported by four 

prestressed concrete beams on concrete piers. The bridge is located on the two-mile long 

Causeway Road connecting the mainland with Wallops Island. The proposed project would 

address structural deficiencies and improve safety by meeting current roadway and bridge design 

standards. 

The EA will discuss the project background, the need for the proposed action, environmental 

issues associated with the project, potential impacts resulting from the alternatives considered, 

public involvement, and government agency coordination. The two alternatives being evaluated 

in the EA are "no build" and "replacement". The no build alternative would include maintenance 

and rehabilitation of the existing bridge until structural deficiencies necessitate a full closure. 

The replacement alternative would require construction of a new bridge parallel to the existing 

bridge. The existing bridge would remain in use during construction of the new bridge. 

NASA and FHWA are seeking preliminary comments on the proposed action and its potential 

impacts. Updates about the project will be posted on the following FHWA website: 

https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/projects/va/st-nasa-1-9

Comments submitted during the Public Scoping period will assist NASA and FHWA during 

preparation of the Draft EA. The public scoping comment period concludes on September 20, 

2020. Comments can be sent by e-mail to Ryan.Kimberley@dot.gov, or by standard mail to: 

Federal Highway Administration 

ATTN: Ryan Kimberley 

21400 Ridgetop Circle 

Sterling, VA 20166.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

I, Jason A. Jenne, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of True Temper Sports, Inc. (the "Company"), state and certify
that this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 29, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 29, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/JASON A. JENNEJason A. Jenne Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)August 12, 2008


---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in this Form 10-K into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-3, File No. 33-81606; Form S-3, File No.
33-92520; Form S-3, File No. 333-13123; Form S-3, File No. 333-19139; Form S-3,
File No. 333-24607; Form S-3, File No. 333-31719; Form S-3, File No. 333-76143;
Form S-8, File No. 33-83452; Form S-8, File No. 33-99556; Form S-8, File No.
333-29595; Form S-8, File No. 333-72279 and Form S-8, File No. 333-71239.




Vienna, Virginia                               /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
March 10, 2000                           ----------------------------------
                                              Arthur Andersen LLP
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3366 

To require the Environmental Protection Agency and the Corps of Engineers 

to use a certain definition for the term ‘‘prior converted cropland’’, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2023 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Mr. RICKETTS, Mr. THUNE, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. 

BRAUN, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CRAMER, and Mrs. HYDESMITH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the Environmental Protection Agency and the 

Corps of Engineers to use a certain definition for the 

term ‘‘prior converted cropland’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmers Freedom Act 

5 of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PRIOR CONVERTED CROPLAND. 

7 For purposes of the definition of the term ‘‘waters 

8 of the United States’’ under the Federal Water Pollution 

2 

•S 3366 IS

1 Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and exclusions from 

2 that term, including under section 328.3 of title 33 and 

3 section 120.2 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (and 

4 any successor regulations), the Administrator of the Envi5 ronmental Protection Agency and the Secretary of the 

6 Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, shall ensure 

7 that the term ‘‘prior converted cropland’’ has the meaning 

8 given the term in the final rule of the Corps of Engineers 

9 and the Environmental Protection Agency entitled ‘‘The 

10 Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of ‘Waters 

11 of the United States’ ’’ (85 Fed. Reg. 22250 (April 21, 

12 2020)). 

Æ
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

NJ 06 Pleasant Plains Road Roadway Resurfacing

U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service - Great Swamp 

National Wildlife Refuge

Long Hill 

Township Morris 2018

NJ 07 Papakating Valley Rail Trail Multi-Modal Rail Trail

U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service - Great Swamp 

National Wildlife Refuge

Sussex County Sussex 2019

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the New Jersey Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the New Jersey FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

New Jersey Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2017-2020

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. 

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         180,721
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  265,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               445,981
<PP&E>                                       1,218,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,639,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          475,087
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,354
<OTHER-SE>                                     805,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,639,227
<SALES>                                        259,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               259,957
<CGS>                                           19,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                116,419
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            116,419
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   116,419
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-331 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

Antitrust Cooperation 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CHILE 

Signed at Washington March 31, 2011 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CHILE 

Trade: Antitrust Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Washington March 31, 2011; 

 Entered into force March 31, 2011.