Hawaii

Highway Safety Improvement Program

2016 Annual Report

Prepared by: HI
ii

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery & Admission into Evidence

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section [HSIP], shall not be 

subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered 

for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or 

addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.” 

23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, 

or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety 

enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway 

crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any 

highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid 

highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State 

court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any 

occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.”
iii

Table of Contents

Disclaimer...................................................................................................................................................... ii

Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................... 1

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1

Program Structure ........................................................................................................................................ 1

Program Administration ........................................................................................................................... 1

Program Methodology.............................................................................................................................. 3

Progress in Implementing Projects............................................................................................................... 4

Funds Programmed............................................................................................................................... 5

General Listing of Projects.................................................................................................................... 7

Progress in Achieving Safety Performance Targets ...................................................................................... 9

Overview of General Safety Trends.......................................................................................................... 9

Application of Special Rules.................................................................................................................... 13

Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Improvements (Program Evaluation) ..........................................15

SHSP Emphasis Areas.............................................................................................................................. 16

Groups of similar project types............................................................................................................... 18

Systemic Treatments............................................................................................................................... 21

Project Evaluation....................................................................................................................................... 26

Glossary....................................................................................................................................................... 28
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

1

Executive Summary

State of Hawaii 2016 U.S.C. 148(g) Annual Highway Safety Improvement Program Report

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program 

with the purpose of achieving a significant reduction in fatalities and serious 

injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 924.15, States are 

required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP 

implementation and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent 

with the HSIP MAP-21 Reporting Guidance dated February 13, 2013 and consists 

of four sections: program structure, progress in implementing HSIP projects, 

progress in achieving safety performance targets, and assessment of the 

effectiveness of the improvements. 

Program Structure

Program Administration

How are Highway Safety Improvement Program funds allocated in a State? 

Central

Describe how local roads are addressed as part of Highway Safety Improvement Program.

High accident listings and accident data for county roads are submitted to the county offices for internal 

design use. Local agencies can submit project proposals to be considered on the Statewide 

Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and the projects can be funded through HSIP funds if they 

are cost-effective. In addition, HRRRP Funds are offered to the counties.

Identify which internal partners are involved with Highway Safety Improvement Program planning. 

Design

Planning
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

2

Maintenance

Operations

Governors Highway Safety Office

Other-Highway Safety Office assists with the management of non-infrastructure HSIP funds.

Briefly describe coordination with internal partners. 

The HSIP projects are initiated through the analysis of crash data and traffic volume counts obtained by 

the Planning Branch. The HSIP project locations are evaluated to determine if other projects submitted 

by internal partners (Design, Planning, Maintenance, or Operations) can be coordinated or project scope 

can be incorporated within existing projects.

Internal partners assist with project selection preparation of preliminary project scope through field 

investigations. Partners from the offices of design, maintenance and law enforcement participate in the 

prelimanary project scope.

Identify which external partners are involved with Highway Safety Improvement Program planning. 

Local Government Association

Other-Police departments

Identify any program administration practices used to implement the HSIP that have changed since 

the last reporting period.

Other-Police involvement in preliminary project scoping.

Describe any other aspects of Highway Safety Improvement Program Administration on which you 

would like to elaborate.

Statewide projects are submitted to be considered on the STIP.

Focus is more on corridor low-cost safety improvements versus black spots.
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

3

Program Methodology

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP. 

Crash Data

Program: Crash Data

Date of Program Methodology: 9/9/2006

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

All crashes Volume

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Other-Crash severity

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

No

If no, describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

The listings for county roads are ranked according to the accident frequency instead of the rates 

because of the lack of traffic volume data.

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Other-Submitted to be included in the STIP. Follow with collaboration with Districts.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C 2

Available funding 3

Cost Effectiveness 1
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

4

What proportion of highway safety improvement program funds address systemic improvements? 

0%

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

Engineering Study

Identify any program methodology practices used to implement the HSIP that have changed since the 

last reporting period.

Other-None

Describe any other aspects of the Highway Safety Improvement Program methodology on which you 

would like to elaborate. 

During this period, run off roadway and median crossover type accidents were targeted. HDOT is 

currently focusing on reducing fatalities and serious injury type accidents by implementing low-cost 

safety improvement projects along corridors with a history of these types of accidents. In Hawaii, these 

types of accidents have a greater potential of reducing fatalities and serious injury accidents costeffectively, in comparison to "black spot" type projects. HDOT is collaborating with the University of 

Hawaii to develop a Systemic Roadway Departure Plan. With the development of this plan, HDOT hopes 

to address more systemic safety improvements with proven low-cost safety countermeasures.

There was a change in the High Risk Rural Road Methodology from Rural Major/Minor Collectors to 

Rural Roads.

Progress in Implementing Projects
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

5

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for Highway Safety Improvement Program funding.

Federal Fiscal Year

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category.

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) safety projects? 

$0.00

How much funding is obligated to local safety projects?

$0.00

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$1,950,000.00

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$1,950,000.00

Funding Category Programmed* Obligated

HSIP (Section 148) $7,819,154.00 62 % $6,594,254.00 58 %

HRRRP (SAFETEA-LU) $0.00 0 % $0.00 0 %

Penalty Transfer -

Section 154

$1,800,614.00 14 % $1,800,614.00 16 %

Penalty Transfer –

Section 164

$1,800,614.00 14 % $1,783,690.00 16 %

Other Other RHCP $1,098,900.00 9 % $1,098,900.00 10 %

Totals $12,519,282.00 100% $11,277,458.00 100%
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

6

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas during the reporting 

period?

$3,601,228.00

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during the reporting 

period?

$0.00

Discuss impediments to obligating Highway Safety Improvement Program funds and plans to 

overcome this in the future.

The penalty transfer is impacting the HSIP core obligation rate. Our administration plans to introduce 

legislation to attain compliance. We would like to have more projects initiated and assigned for design 

and construction. There is an inability of design staff to handle the workload. Areas such as: 106, rightof-way, and environmental requirements delay projects.

Describe any other aspects of the general Highway Safety Improvement Program implementation 

progress on which you would like to elaborate.

Progress of all HSIP projects is monitored very closely. HSIP program staff follow-up with project 

managers and fiscal staff on a regular basis to track project schedules and make adjustments and 

modifications to the program to minimize the potential for lapsing funds, as well as spend HSIP funds 

efficiently.
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

7

General Listing of Projects

List each highway safety improvement project obligated during the reporting period. 

Project Improveme

nt Category 

Outpu

t 

HSIP 

Cost

Total 

Cost

Funding 

Categor

y

Functional 

Classificatio

n

AADT Spee

d

Roadway 

Ownershi

p

Relationship to SHSP

Emphasis 

Area

Strategy

Guardrail & 

Shoulder 

Improvement

s at Various 

Loc

Shoulder 

treatments 

Shoulder 

treatments -

other

27 

Miles

254090

3

254090

3

Penalty 

Transfer 

–

Section 

164

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Roadway 

Departure

Improve 

the design 

and 

operation

H-1 G & S 

Improvement

s, Middle St -

Punchbowl St

Shoulder 

treatments 

Shoulder 

treatments -

other

3.1 

Miles

212437

6

212437

6

HSIP 

(Section 

148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

14061

4

50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Roadway 

Departure

Improve 

the design 

and 

operation

Kamehameha 

Hwy Safety 

Improve, 

Kahana Rd 

Kaaawa Br

Roadway 

Rumble 

strips - edge 

or shoulder

2.7 

Miles

162508

1

162508

1

HSIP 

(Section 

148)

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

13050 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

Install 

rumble 

strips

Farrington 

Hwy 

Resurfacing, 

Kili Dr -

Yokohama Dr

Roadway 

Rumble 

strips - edge 

or shoulder

5.5 

Miles

243398

0

243398

0

HSIP 

(Section 

148)

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

3050 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

Install 

rumble 

strips

Keeau-Pahoa 

Rd Shoulder 

Lane 

Conversion, 

Roadway 

Roadway -

other

2 

Miles

552542 552542 HSIP 

(Section 

148)

Urban 

Minor 

Arterial

20700 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Intersection

s

Incorporat

e designs 

that 

reduce 
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

8

Ph 1 & 2 conflict

Kuhio Hwy 

Safety 

Improv, vic of 

Wailapa RdKapaka

Roadway 

Rumble 

strips - edge 

or shoulder

5.7 

Miles

67500 67500 HSIP 

(Section 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

13667 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Lane 

Departure

Install 

rumble 

strips

HSIP NonInfrastructure 

Funding 

Program

Noninfrastructur

e 

195000

0

195000

0

Penalty 

Transfer 

-

Section 

154

All 

Emphasis 

Areas

Education 

and 

Enforceme

nt
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

9

Progress in Achieving Safety Performance Targets

Overview of General Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the state for the past five years. 

Performance Measures* 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Number of fatalities 131 126 113 111 110

Number of serious injuries 379 357 346 365

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 1.29 1.24 1.13 1.11 1.1

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 3.74 3.53 3.45 3.66

*Performance measure data is presented using a five-year rolling average.
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

10
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

11
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

12

To the maximum extent possible, present performance measure* data by functional classification and ownership. 
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

13

Describe any other aspects of the general highway safety trends on which you would like to elaborate.

We are currently addressing the timeliness of our data. Due to previous manpower shortage, it was 

difficult to keep up with the workflow. We were able to fill all vacancies within our section and have 

reshifted our priorities to increase the timeliness of the database. We also are in the process of 

soliciting a vendor through an RFP to upgrade our current obsolete database, replace it with a more 

robust system, and address the backlog of data. Data for next year's report should reflect more current 

data years.

Application of Special Rules

Present the rate of traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and pedestrians over the 

age of 65. 

Older Driver

Performance Measures

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Fatality rate (per capita) 0.092 0.082 0.08 0.078 0.076

Serious injury rate (per 

capita)

0.27 0.26 0.27

Fatality and serious injury 

rate (per capita)

0.36 0.34 0.35

*Performance measure data is presented using a five-year rolling average.

Calculation Rate for 2008-2012 Fatality and Serious Injury Rate for Older Drivers and Pedestrians -

[(F+SI 2008 Drivers and Pedestrians 65 years of age and older/2008 population figure) + 

(F+SI 2009 Drivers and Pedestrians 65 years of age and older/2009 population figure) +

(F+SI 2010 Drivers and Pedestrians 65 years of age and older/2010 population figure) +

(F+SI 2011 Drivers and Pedestrians 65 years of age and older/2011 population figure) +

(F+SI 2012 Drivers and Pedestrians 65 years of age and older/2012 population figure)]/5
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

14

* Please note that more current data is uavailable at this time. We are addressing the timeliness of our 

data and plan to have more to report next year. Figure in 2014 Fatality and serious injury rate is 

incorrect but program would not allow me continue without entering a number.

Does the older driver special rule apply to your state? 

Yes

If yes, describe the approach to include respective strategies to address the increase in those rates in 

the State SHSP.

With the updated SHSP plan completed, we will look into introducing this concern as a new potential 
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

15

emphasis area in the future.

Unable to conclude if older driver special rule still applies to Hawaii since older data was used.

Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Improvements (Program 

Evaluation)

What indicators of success can you use to demonstrate effectiveness and success in the Highway 

Safety Improvement Program?

Benefit/cost

If 'benefit/cost', indicate the overall Highway Safety Improvement Program benefit/cost ratio.

Ratio greater than 1. No specific ratio value used for comparison.

What significant programmatic changes have occurred since the last reporting period? 

Shift Focus to Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Briefly describe significant program changes that have occurred since the last reporting period. 

We are currently addressing the timeliness of our data. Due to previous manpower shortage, it was 

difficult to keep up with the workflow. We were able to fill all vacancies within our section and have 

reshifted our priorities to increase the timeliness of the database. We are currently in the process of 

soliciting a vendor through an RFP to replace the existing obsolete database and address the data 

backlog. Data for next year's report should reflect more current data years.
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

16

SHSP Emphasis Areas

For each SHSP emphasis area that relates to the HSIP, present trends in emphasis area performance measures. 

Year - 2015

HSIP-related SHSP 

Emphasis Areas

Target Crash Type Number of 

fatalities

Number of 

serious 

injuries

Fatality rate 

(per HMVMT)

Serious injury 

rate (per 

HMVMT)

Other1Other2Other3

Pedestrians Vehicle/pedestrian 26 0.26

Bicyclists Vehicle/bicycle 3 0.03

Motorcyclists Motorcycles 30 0.3

Unable to provide more 

current data at this time
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

17
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

18

Groups of similar project types
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

19

Present the overall effectiveness of groups of similar types of projects.

Year - 2013

HSIP Sub-program Types Target Crash 

Type

Number of 

fatalities

Number of 

serious 

injuries

Fatality rate 

(per HMVMT)

Serious injury 

rate (per 

HMVMT)

Other1Other2Other3

Unable to provide more 

current data at this time

Backplates with 

retroreflective borders

Disregard 

traffic signal

2 0.02

Milled rumble strips Run-off-road 47 0.47
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

20
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

21

Systemic Treatments
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

22

Present the overall effectiveness of systemic treatments.

Year - 2013

Systemic improvement Target Crash 

Type

Number of 

fatalities

Number of 

serious 

injuries

Fatality rate 

(per HMVMT)

Serious injury 

rate (per 

HMVMT)

Other1Other2Other3

Unable to provide more 

current data at this time

Upgrade Guardrails Collision with 

guardrail

9 0.1

Install/Improve Lighting Night-time 25 0.25

Rumble Strips Run-off-road 47 0.47
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

23
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

24
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

25

Describe any other aspects of the overall Highway Safety Improvement Program effectiveness on 

which you would like to elaborate. 

The State of Hawaii considers fatal and serious injury accidents for all analyses along with the total 

number of major traffic accidents. We will be working towards providing more of the requested data 

with next year's submittal.
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

26

Project Evaluation

Provide project evaluation data for completed projects (optional). 

Location Functional 

Class

Improvement 

Category

Improvement 

Type

BefFatalBefSerious 

Injury

Bef-All 

Injuries

BefPDOBefTotalAftFatalAftSerious 

Injury

Aft-All 

Injuries

AftPDOAftTotalEvaluation 

Results 

(Benefit/ Cost 

Ratio)

Choose 

option not 

to report at 

this time
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

27

Optional Attachments

Sections Files Attached
2016 Hawaii Highway Safety Improvement Program

28

Glossary

5 year rolling average means the average of five individual, consecutive annual points of data (e.g. 

annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process. 

Highway safety improvement project means strategies, activities and projects on a public road that are 

consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous road location 

or feature or addresses a highway safety problem. 

HMVMT means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which data 

are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance dated 

February 13, 2013. 

Performance measure means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to monitor 

changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and objectives.

Programmed funds mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification means the process by which streets and highways are grouped into 

classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on safety 

data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148. 

Systematic refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across a 

system.

Systemic safety improvement means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high risk 

roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types. 

Transfer means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.