U.S.Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

February 9, 2018 In Reply Refer To: 

HSST-1/B-299 

Mr. Gerrit A. Dyke, P .E. 

Lindsay Transportation Solutions, Inc. 

180 River Road 

Rio Vista, CA 95471 

Dear Mr. Dyke: 

This letter is in response to your December 6, 2017 request for the Federal Highway 

Administration (FHW A) to review a roadside safety device, hardware, or system for eligibility 

for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program. This FHWA letter of eligibility is 

assigned FHWA control number B-299 and is valid until a subsequent letter is issued by FHWA 

that expressly references this device. 

Decision 

The following device is eligible within the length-of-need, with details provided in the form 

which is attached as an integral part of this letter: 

• RTS Guard 

Scope of this Letter 

To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding, new roadside safety devices should meet the crash 

test and evaluation criteria contained in the American Association of State Highway and 

Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). 

However, the FHWA, the Department of Transportation, and the United States Government do 

not regulate the manufacture of roadside safety devices. Eligibility for reimbursement under the 

Federal-aid highway program does not establish approval, certification or endorsement of the 

device for any particular purpose or use. 

This letter is not a determination by the FHW A, the Department of Transportation, or the United 

States Government that a vehicle crash involving the device will result in any particular 

outcome, nor is it a guarantee of the in-service performance ofthis device. Proper 

manufacturing, installation, and maintenance are required in order for this device to function as 

tested. 

This finding of eligibility is limited to the crash worthiness ofthe system and does not cover other 

structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 
2 

Eligibility for Reimbursement 

Based solely on a review of crash test results and certifications submitted by the manufacturer, 

and the crash test laboratory, FHWA agrees that the device described herein meets the crash test 

and evaluation criteria of the AASHTO's MASH. Therefore, the device is eligible for 

reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program if installed under the range of tested 

conditions. 

Name of system: RTS Guard 

Type of system: Longitudinal Barrier 

Test Level: MASH Test Level 3 (TL3) 

Testing conducted by: Safe Technologies, Inc. 

Date of request: December 6, 2017 

Date initially acknowledged: December 6, 2017 

FHWA concurs with the recommendation of the accredited crash testing laboratory on the 

attached form. 

Full Description of the Eligible Device 

The device and supporting documentation, including reports of the crash tests or other testing 

done, videos of any crash testing, and/or drawings of the device, are described in the attached 

form. 

Notice 

This eligibility letter is issued for the subject device as tested. Modifications made to the device 

are not covered by this letter. Any modifications to this device should be submitted to the user 

(i.e., state DOT) as per their requirements. 

You are expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design, installation and 

maintenance requirements to ensure proper performance. 

You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the same chemistry, 

mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for review, and that it will meet the test 

and evaluation criteria of AASHTO's MASH. 

Issuance of this letter does not convey property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege. This 

letter is based on the premise that information and reports submitted by you are accurate and 

correct. We reserve the right to modify or revoke this letter if: (1) there are any inaccuracies in 

the information submitted in support of your request for this letter, (2) the qualification testing 

was flawed, (3) in-service performance or other information reveals safety problems, (4) the 

system is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, or (5) any other 

information indicates that the letter was issued in error or otherwise does not reflect full and 
3 

complete information about the crash worthiness ofthe system. 

Standard Provisions 

• To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of eligibility designated as FHWA 

control number B-299 shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test 

documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and 

documentation may be reviewed upon request. 

• This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHW A to use, 

manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder. 

• If the subject device is a patented product it may be considered to be proprietary. If 

proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects: 

(a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented 

items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization 

with the existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists; or ( c) 

they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short 

sections of road for experimental purposes. Our regulations concerning proprietary 

products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411. 

Sincerely, 

Michael S. Griffith 

Director, Office of Safety Technologies 

Office of Safety 

Enclosures 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 1 of 5 

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility 

of Highway Safety Hardware 

...

... 

a,

·e 

..c 

:I 

II) 

Date of Request: December 06, 2017 I (i' New (' Resubmission 

Name: Gerrit A. Dyke, P.E. 

... Company: 

Address: 

Country: 

Lindsay Transportation Solutions, Inc. 

180 River Road, Rio Vista, CA 95471 

USA 

To: Michael S. Griffith, Director 

FHWA, Office of Safety Technologies 

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid 

highway program. 

Device & Testing Criterion - Enter from right to left starting with Test Level I ' -' -' I 

System Type Submission Type Device Name/ Variant Testing Criterion Test 

Level 

'B': Rigid/Semi-Rigid Barriers 

(Roadside, Median, Bridge 

Railinas\ 

(i' Physical Crash Testing 

(' Engineering Analysis 

RTS Guard 

AASHTOMASH TL3 

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration, I certify 

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety 

Hardware and that the evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH. 

Individual or Organization responsible for the product: 

Contact Name: Gerrit A. Dyke, P.E. Same as Submitter IZI 

Company Name: Lindsay Transportation Solutions, Inc. Same as Submitter IZI 

Address: 

Country: 

180 River Road, Rio Vista, CA 95471 

USA 

Same as Submitter IZI 

Same as Submitter IZI 

Enter below all disclosures of financial interests as required by the FHWA 'Federal-Aid Reimbursement 

Eligibility Process for Safety Hardware Devices' document. 

Safe Technologies, Inc. (STI) performs testing and analysis services for Lindsay Transportation Solutions, Inc. 

(LTS). STI is a wholly owned subsidiary of LTS. STI is a fully accredited crash test facility to ISO 17025 by A2LA 

and is recognized by the US Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to perform full scale crash tests per NCHRP 

Report 350 and MASH criteria. 

The STI laboratory manager, technicians, and laborers are compensated by LTS for salaries and wages. STI and 

staff does not receive any incentives, compensation, commissions, or professional fees corresponding to the 

outcome of any testing or analysis. 

STI or staff does not receive any research funding or other research support from LTS. STI and staff also do not 

have any financial interest in patents, copyrights, or other intellectual property associated with the products 

they test or analyze. 

KARCO Engineering, LLC. was contracted by LTS to collaborate with STI for this testing program. KARCO 

provided guidance, recommendations, and suggestions for testing and reporting practices. KARCO reviewed 

test data and reports to ensure accuracy and correct representation of test parameters and results. KARCO nor 

any KARCO employee has any financial interest in LTS, STI, or the product being tested. 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 2 of 5 

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 

(e New Hardware or 

• Significant Modification 

(' Modification to 

Existing Hardware 

The RTS Guard is a polyethylene height extension for concrete and steel barrier. The RTS Guard is designed to 

complement MASH Test Level 3 impact performance and vehicle containment of concrete and steel barriers by

providing improved containment and protection to pedestrians and cyclists who may interact with the barrier. 

In addition, the RTS Guard provides glare and gawk screen benefits. The RTS Guard is designed to exceed 

typical hand rail standards while remaining intact and limiting debris during vehicle impacts. The RTS Guard 

may be applied to the QuickChange Moveable Barrier Concrete Reactive Tension System (QMB-CRTS) or similar

barrier systems. 

The RTS Guard is comprised of a polyethylene segment measuring approximately 11 3/8 in [0.3ml wide, 35 1 /2 

in [0.9ml long and 1 O 3/16 in [0.3ml tall. The segment is fastened to the tops of concrete or steel barriers using

concrete anchors or hardware. When applied to a 32" [0.8ml, the RTS Guard provides a nominal 42" [1 .0ml 

barrier system. 

Enclosure A includes several details regarding RTS Guard applications and variations including the application 

of decals and ID codes, mounting hardware, barrier applications, polyethylene material variations and color 

options. 

Manufacturing drawings may be adj usted to ensure manufacturing capability and consistency with MASH 

tested and certified product. 

CRASH TESTING 

By signature below, the Engineer affiliated with the testing laboratory, agrees in support of this submission that

all of the critical and relevant crash tests for this device listed above were conducted to meet the MASH test 

criteria. The Engineer has determined that no other crash tests are necessary to determine the device meets 

the MASH criteria. 

Engineer Name: Joseph Nagy 

Engineer Signature: Joseph Nagy Digitally signed by Joseph Nagy

Date: 2017.12.06 15:07:28 -08'00' 

Address: 170 River Road, Rio Vista, CA 94571 Same as Submitter D 

Country: USA Same as Submitter D 

A briet description ot each crash test and its result: 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 3 of 5 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description 

Evaluation 

Results 

3-10 (1100() 

The system was judged to have successfully 

met all of the evaluation criteria for MASH 

Test 3-10 without any adverse effect caused 

by the addition of the RTS Guard. 

The QMB-CRTS barrier equipped with the 

RTS Guard satisfied the MASH structural 

adequacy criteria for its intended function 

as a longitudinal barrier. The test article 

redirected the 11 00C vehicle in a controlled 

manner. The vehicle did not penetrate, 

underride, or override the installation. The 

test article exhibited some permanent and 

dynamic deflection in the test. 

The QMB-CRTS barrier equipped with the 

RTS Guard satisfied all occupant risk criteria. 

Theoretical occupant impact velocities in 

the longitudinal and lateral directions were 

below the preferred limit of 30.0 ft/s (9.1 ml 

s). Ridedown accelerations in the 

longitudinal and lateral directions were well 

below the preferred limit of 15.0 G. There 

was no test article debris detached during 

the test. 

There was minimal deformation to the 

occupant compartment of the 11 00C test 

vehicle. There was no intrusion into the 

occupant compartment. The test vehicle 

remained upright during and after the 

collision with minor roll and pitch. 

The QMB-CRTS barrier equipped with the 

RTS Guard was judged as satisfying the 

applicable vehicle trajectory criteria 

specified in MASH without any adverse 

effect caused by the addition of the RTS 

Guard. 

PASS 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 4 of 5 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description 

Evaluation 

Results 

3-11 (2270P) 

The system was judged to have successfully 

met all of the evaluation criteria for MASH 

Test 3-11 without any adverse effect caused 

by the add ition of the RTS Guard. 

The QMB-CRTS barrier equipped with the 

RTS Guard satisfied the MASH structural 

adequacy criteria for its intended function 

as a longitudinal barrier. The test article 

redirected the 2270P vehicle in a controlled 

manner. The vehicle did not penetrate, 

underride, or override the installation. The 

test article exhibited controlled permanent 

and dynamic deflection in the test. 

The QMB-CRTS barrier equipped with the 

RTS Guard satisfied all occupant risk criteria. 

Theoretical occupant impact velocities in 

the longitudinal and lateral directions were 

well below the preferred limit of 30.0 ft/s 

(9.1 m/s). Ridedown accelerations in the 

longitudinal and lateral directions were well 

below the preferred limit of 15.0 G. There 

was no test article debris detached during 

the test. 

There was minimal deformation to the 

occupant compartment of the 2270P test 

vehicle. There was no intrusion into the 

occupant compartment. The test vehicle 

remained upright during and after the 

collision with minor roll and pitch. 

The QMB-CRTS barrier equipped with the 

RTS Guard was judged as satisfying the 

applicable vehicle trajectory criteria 

specified in MASH without any adverse 

effect caused by the addition of the RTS 

Guard. 

PASS 

3-20 (11 00C) 

Optional Test not performed. CRTS is a 

stand alone barrier system that will not 

transition to any stiffer or more rigid barrier 

systems. Therefore, test 3-20 is not 

required. 

Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

3-21 (2270P) 

Test not performed. CRTS is a stand alone 

barrier system that will not transition to any 

stiffer or more rigid barrier systems. 

Therefore, test 3-21 is not required. 

Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test 

laboratory (cite the laboratory's accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports .): 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 5 of 5 

Laboratory Name: Safe Technologies, Inc. 

Laboratory Sig_nature: Joseph Nagy Digitally signed by Joseph Nagy 

Date: 2017.12.06 15:09:02 -08'00' 

Address: 170 River Road, Rio Vista, CA 94571 Same as Submitter D 

Country: USA Same as Submitter D 

Accreditation Certificate 

Number and Dates of current 

Accreditation period : 

1851 .01, Valid through March 31, 2018 

. D k Digitally signed by Gerrit Dyke Submitter Signature*: Gernt y e Datec2017.12.061S:0933 

-08'00' 

Submit Form 

ATTACHMENTS 

Attach to this form: 

1) Additional disclosures of related financial interest as indicated above. 

2) A copy of the full test report, video, and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in 

support of this request. 

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications 

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards]. For proprietary products, a single isometric line drawing is 

usually acceptable to illustrate the product, with detailed specifications, intended use, and contact 

information provided on the reverse. Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that 

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted 

to facilitate our review. 

FHWA Official Business Only: 

Eligibility Letter 

Number Date Key Words 
n 

~--/

I 

'

., . - if\ •~ ~-?/ R_ 

n 

ii170m 

85m 

' . j ~ .. ts: ~·~ ..

~ ........ 

t= 0.000 sec t= 0.100 sec t= 0.200 sec 

General Information 

Test Agency ... ....... ................ ............................. SAFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Test Number. ..... ...... .. ...... ... .......... ...... .. ... ........ QMBBT310 

Test Designation ..... ................. ....................... ..... . MASH 3-10 

Date...... ... ........ .... ...... .... ... ... ...... ................. 7/19/2017 

Test Article 

Name ........................ .. .. ........ ... ..... ..... . . Lindsay Transportation Solutions 

RTS Guard 

Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . Longitudinal Movable Barrier 

Installation Length .... ..... ......... .... ..... .... ..... ....... ... ... 557.7 ft (170 m) 

Segment Length .... .. ..... ... .... .... ...... ..... ............... ... 39.4 in (1 m) 

Width ... .. ............... . ... ... ..... 18 in (457 mm) 

Height .. .... ... .. . ..... 42.25 in (1 ,073 mm) 

Test Vehicle 

Type / Designation ...... ... ...... ..... ...... .... ..... ... .. ........ 1100C 

Make and Model .................... ........ ..... ...... ............ 2011 Hyundai Accent 

Curb Weight ... ... ..... ... .. ..... ..... ..... ............. ... ......... 2,473.6 lb (1 ,122 kg) 

Test Inertial Weight .................. ... .... ... ..... ........... .. 2,443.8 lb (1 ,108.5 kg) 

Gross Static Weight ....... ........... .. ... .. ... .. ...... ...... .... 2,609.2 lb (1 ,183.5 kg) 

Impact Conditions 

Speed ......................... ... ... .. ..... ............. .... ...... . 62.7 mph (100.9 km/h) 

Angle... ........ ....... .. .. ...... . ......................... 25.0 deg 

Location I Orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. Midpoint 

t= 0.300 sec t= 0.500 sec t= 0.800 sec 

Exit Conditions 

Speed ....................... ................................ ...... ..... 44.6 mph (71.7 km/h) 

Angle (deg) ... ...... .. ....... ...... ...... ...... ...... .................. 14 

Exit Box Criterion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .... Pass 

Post Impact Trajectory 

Vehicle Stability . . . . . ............. .. .... .. ..................... Satisfactory 

Stopping Distance ............ ....... ... ..... ...... . . ...... ... .. 156 ft (47.6 m) downstream 

Occupant risk Values 

Longitudinal OIV ........ . ......... ...... ........ .. 22.0 ft/s (6.7 mis) 

Lateral OIV ... .. .... ..... ....... ... ... ... ..... . 27.9 ft/s (8.5 mis) 

Longitudinal ORA ... ..... .. . . . 9.7 g's 

Lateral ORA ... .... 12.7g's 

THIV . 33.1 ft/s (10.1 m/s) 

PHO ... 12.8 g's 

ASI ..... .................... .... . 2.05 

Test Article Damage: ...... ..... ...... .... ... . Minimal 

Test Article Deflections 

Permanent ... ......... ..... ......... ... .. .... .. ... ... ............ .... . 30.0 in (762 mm) 

Dynamic ......... ............ .. .... ... .................. ...... ...... ... . 31 .2 in (792 mm) 

Vehicle Damage 11-LFQ-5 

VDS...... .. .. .. .... · .. .. ........ ..... ......... ........... ....... . 

11LFAS3 

Maximum Deformation ... .. ... ......... ... ............. .. ... 1.25 in (31.8 mm)-floor pan 

CDC............. ...... ·············•·············· .. ········•· 
t= 0.000 sec t= 0.100 sec t= 0.200 sec t= 0.300 sec t= 0.500 sec t= 0.800 sec 

c~ 

n ) 

--\. 

r, -

- -

----------------- 170m 

- 85m 

~~· ~ ~~•=

'---l_ 

General Information 

Test Agency .. ...................... .... ... . SAFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Test Number ...... ...... ...... ......... ...... .... .... ....... . . QMBBT311 

Test Designation ...... ...... .... .. ... ... ......... ..... .. ..... . MASH 3-11 

Date .... ...... . ....... ..... ......... .... .............. ........... 7/18/2017 

Test Article 

Name ..... Lindsay Transportation Solutions 

RTS Guard 

Type ... ····· ··········· ..... ...... ..... ...... ........ ... .... . Longitudinal Movable Barrier 

Installation Length ......... ........ ...... ...... ... .... ..... ..... . 557.7 ft (170 m) 

Segment Length . ..... ........ ... ... ...... ...... .. ....... ...... .. 39.4 in (1 m) 

Width ...... ...... ............ ....... ....... .................... ...... 18 in (457 mm) 

Height ............ ...... . ..... ....... ...... ......... . .. 42.25 in (1 ,073 mm) 

Test Vehicle 

Type / Designation .... .............. ...... ...... ...... .... ... .... 2270P 

Make and Model .................. ..... ...... .......... ......... .. 2011 Dodge Ram 1500 

Curb Weight ........................... ............... ..... .... .. ... 4,913.0 lbs (2,228.5 kg) 

Test Inertial Weight ...... .. . .. 5,062.9 lbs (2,296.5 kg) 

Gross Static Weight .. . 5,062.9 lbs (2 ,296.5 kg) 

Impact Conditions 

Speed ....................... ... .... ... ..... ........ .. ..... ........ . 62.9 mph (101 .2 km/h) 

Angle .................................... ... ........... .. .... ... .. . 25.0 deg 

Location I Orientation ..... ... .... ...... ...... ...... .... ..... .... . Midpoint 

Exit Conditions 

Speed ......... ...... ...... ....... .... ... ....... ........... . 36.2 mph (58.2 km/h) 

Angle (deg) ............. ..... ............ .... ..... ...... .. ... ......... . 13.2 

Exit Box Criterion ... ...... ...... .. .... ............................. Pass 

Post Impact Trajectory 

Vehicle Stability ... .......... ..... ...... .. ............ ....... ......... Satisfactory 

Stopping Distance ................. ............... ......... ... ... . 224.4 ft (68.4 m) 

Occupant risk Values 

Longitudinal OIV ...................... .. ...... ...... ............. .. 16.4 ft/s (5.0 m/s) 

Lateral OIV ............. ..... ......... ............... ...... ..... .... ... 16.7 ft/s (5.1 mis) 

Longitudinal ORA ..... ... ... .. .. .. ..... ........ ......... ........ ..... 6.8 g's 

Lateral ORA ......... ... .... ... ........ ..... .... ...... ......... ...... .. 10.7 g's 

THIV .... ... ............... ....... ..... .............. ... .. ..... ..... ..... 23.3ft/s(7.1 mis) 

PHO ......... .... .... . 11 .5 g's 

ASI ... ... ... ....... .... . 1.11 

Test Article Damage: Minimal 

Test Article Deflections 

Permanent ... ... ...... ...... ...... .......................... ...... .. . 44.6 in (1 .133 m) 

Dynamic ......... ..... ....... ........... ..... ...... ........ ...... ...... 48.7 in (1 .237 m) 

Veh icle Damage 

VOS ...... .. ................... .. .... .. ...... ..... .. ...... .... .... ........ 11-LFQ-5 

CDC ...... .. ....... ... ....... ... ... ................. ...... ........ ........ 11LFAS3 

Maximum Deformation ...... ......... ...... .... ...... ... .. ......... 0.81 in (20.6 mm)-floor pan 
RTS GUARD HARDWARE KIT 

[ 1. 1 m] 

42 9 16" 

. . 

[\., .~ ···:~--·.(·· 

·.. >--,,_:':•_:_,:... ' / QUICKCHANGE MOVABLE BARRIER 

' .·· ~ CONCRETE REACT IVE TENS ION SYSTEM 

<. )/ BARRIER 

RTS GUARD VLB - INNER SHELL 

RTS GUARD VLB - OUTER SHELL 

[0.9m l 

34 1/s"RETRACTED 

[1.2m] 

EXPANDED 

[ 1.1 m] 

42 1/4" ~-:·· 

'\ j : 

t:},,jlI ·,., /'.·;··, ./1·· ·;u~- I/ 

, ;,.J ~QUICKCHANGE MOVABLE BARRIER 

.. . . E ," VARIABLE LENGTH BARRIER ··········:,.L_______ _______ _J/· 

RTS GUARDTM 

I ROAD ZIPPER• 

ll'fUNDSAY SHEET NO. DATE: Lin d sa y Trans p ortation Sol u t ions, 180 Ri ver Rd .. Rio Vista CA. 9457 1. 888 - 800- 3691 

www.the roadzipper.com 1 OF 2 XXX 
INTENDED USE 

The RTS GuardTM (RTSG) is a supplementary safety device designed to enhance the MASH Test Level 3 impact performance and 

vehicle containment of concrete barrier by providing improved containment and protection to pedestrians and cyclists who may 

interact with the barrier. In addition, the RTSG provides glare and gawk screen benefits. When installed on CRTS longitudinal barrier 

segments, the 42" nominal system height follows design guidelines stated in AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 

13.9.2-Geometry and C13.9.2. 

The CRTS barrier without RTSG has been successfully tested to MASH Test Level 3 and was issued a Federal Highway Administration 

(FHWA) eligibility letter under FHWA control number 8-277. Crash test data shows that during a TL-3 impact with a 2270P vehicle 

the RTSG flexes and experiences some local ized tearing directly within the impact zone while remaining attached to the barrier. 

Outside of the impact zone, the RTSG sees only minor deformation. 

The system consists of the RTS GuardTM, two screw anchors, RTS GuardTM VLB, and accompanying VLB hardware kit. 

The system can be installed on any QMB-CRTS barrier and respective VLB. Contact the manufacturer for further in fo rmation and 

installation instructions. 

APPROVALS 

The RTS G UARDTM has been fully tested in conformance with MASH Test Level 3 and is determined eligible 

for Federal reimbursement by FHWA. 

FHW A Elgibility Letters: XXXXXXX 

CONTACT INFORMATION 

Lindsay Transportation Solutions 

180 River Rd. 

Rio Vista, CA 94571 

www.barriersystemsinc.com 

Phone: 888-800-3691 or 707-374-6800 

Fax: 707-374-6801 

Email: info@barriersystemsinc.com 

RTS GUARDTM 

• ROAD

SHEET NO. DATE: BYUNDSAY

Lindsay Transportation So lutions. 180 Ri ver Rd., Rio Vista CA. 94571, 888 - 800- 3691 

2 OF 2 ww w.theroadzipper.com