alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-282-CV

ROBERT L. ELLIOT, M.D., RANDALL WRIGHT, APPELLANTS

M.D., AND GENERAL SURGERY CLINIC OF 

GRAPEVINE

V.

EDWARD J. JESIONEK AND JOHANNA APPELLEES

(JOSIE) JESIONEK

----------

FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellants Robert L. Elliot, M.D., Randall Wright,

M.D. and General Surgery Clinic of Grapevine's Motion to Dismiss.” It is the

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM
2

PANEL: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ. 

DELIVERED: September 10, 2009
-

-

Response

I)ave Lott('r1r

Roher! I-IaCkilllllll

Craig Fabiall

I

Regiullnl Airline Association

AirlT~lft Owners 8.;I'ilots Association

+AA-20to -\~()9

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this ro 05al bJen discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date

Natioml1 Bu~in('ss A.ircraft Association Eli Cotti
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. MT98-2-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

October 16, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 10, 1997 National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered for filing to its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheets Nos. 434 and 435, 
proposed to become effective November 14, 1997.
    National's proposed tariff sheets are filed to comply with the 
requirement in Section 250.16 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 
Section 250.16) that pipelines which conduct transportation 
transactions with affiliated marketing or brokering entities must 
update and refile, to reflect changes, the tariff provisions required 
by that regulation.
    National states that copies of this filing were served upon the 
Company's jurisdictional customers and the Regulatory Commissions of 
the States of New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Massachusetts and 
New Jersey.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be 
filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27916 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Ethel E. PINSKER, Appellant, v. FILMORE INVESTORS CORP., a Florida corporation and Somerset Land, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-123.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 12, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1971.

Shutts & Bowen and Thomas H. Anderson, Miami, for appellant.

Simon, Hays & Grundwerg, and Jack D. Burris, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Ethel E. Pinsker, plaintiff, appeals from a final judgment rendered for the defendants in a declaratory decree action.

Plaintiff agrees that the finding of facts contained in the final decree are not in dispute except as to the accounting.

We have reviewed the conclusions and adjudications in the final judgment which were based on those findings of fact and hold that no reversible error has been demonstrated in the final decree, including the accounting.

No error was made in the denial of plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint by adding additional defendants and to have the available assets of all the defendants marshalled. This motion was made after plaintiff had presented her case and rested. No abuse of discretion by the trial judge has been shown in this appeal. Wooten v. Wooten, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 292; Triax, Inc. v. City of Treasure Island, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 669; and Houston Texas Gas & Oil Corporation v. Hoeffner, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 38.

The final decree is

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[102197B]


Marine Mammals; Permit No. 837 (P77-1#67)

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Scientific research permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a request for amendment of 
scientific research permit no. 837 submitted by The National Marine 
Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NMFS, NOAA, 7600 
Sand Point Way NE., BIN C15700, Seattle, Washington 98115, has been 
granted.

ADDRESSES: The amendment and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/
713-2289); and
    Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 12, 1997, notice was published 
in the Federal Register (62 FR 48062) that an amendment of permit no. 
837, issued June 4, 1993 (58 FR 33085), had been requested by the 
above-named organization. The original permit authorized studies on 
northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) over a five-year period on 
rookeries in the Bering Sea and eastern North Pacific Ocean. The 
requested amendment has been granted under the authority of the Marine 
Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the 
provisions of Sec. 216.39 of the Regulations Governing the Taking and 
Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216), and the Fur Seal Act of 
1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1151 et seq.).
    The permit was amended to authorize the following increased takings 
of northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus): To collect biopsy samples 
from 30 additional females on St. Paul and 30 additional females on St. 
George Islands. The total number of females to be biopsy sampled on 
both St. Paul and St. George will increase to 180 (90 on each island).

    Dated: October 20, 1997.
Ann Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-28439 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                             CONSENT OF HOBE & LUCAS

March 30, 2005

Mr. Russell Ciphers, Sr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Stone Industries, Inc.
230 W. Main Street
South Amherst, OH  44001

Re: Consent to Incorporation of Independent Auditor's Report

Dear Mr. Ciphers:

This firm was the independent auditor for American Stone Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. In this context, we
understand that the Company is filing a Form 10-KSB with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and has filed a Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (registration number 333-74899).

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(23) of Regulation S-B, this letter will serve as our
consent for the Company to file with the Form 10-KSB and incorporate by
reference in the Form S-8 our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm dated February 18, 2005 for fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and to the
reference to Hobe & Lucas, Certified Public Accounts, Inc., therein.

                                          /s/ Hobe & Lucas
                                              Certified Public Accountants, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NTL Incorporated (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Simon P. Duffy, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jacques Kerrest, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/SIMON P. DUFFYName: Simon P. Duffy
Title: Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Date: March 16, 2005 | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/JACQUES KERRESTName: Jacques Kerrest
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 16, 2005                       | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-97893, 333-47596, 333-03465, and 333-61611) of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. of our report dated April 23, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements, of Shurgard Self Storage, SCA whichappears in this annual report on Form 10-K. 

Brussels, March 20, 2006 

/s/    Deloitte Reviseurs d’Entreprises 

SC s.f.d. SCRL 

Deloitte Reviseurs d’Entreprises 

SC s.f.d. SCRL 

Represented by Daniel Kroes
×
 ×
 ×
 ×
 Step 1
                    Identify
                    Stakeholders
 Step 2
                    Use
                    Safety Data
 Step 3
                    Choose Proven
                    Solutions
 Step 4
                    Implement
                    Solutions
 Finish Line
  Building an enthusiastic team with a diverse skill set is the first step to success in making a local road safety plan. This has two main benefits. First, you get lots of perspectives from different stakeholders. Second, a diverse team creates buy in, which is crucial for implementing your plan. Use the tools and examples on this page to make a great team!
 Local Agency Insights: Identify Stakeholders Local Agency Insights: Identify Stakeholders Video Thumbnail Local Agency Insights: Safety Plan Vision and Mission Local Agency Insights: Safety Plan Vision and Mission Video Thumbnail Communicating About Local Road Safety with Local Elected Officials: Techniques for Practitioners Communicating About Local Road Safety with Local Elected Officials: Techniques for Practitioners Video Thumbnail Local Elected Officials: Leading the Way in Local Road Safety Local Elected Officials: Leading the Way in Local Road Safety Video Thumbnail
 Content will open in a new window Tools and Resources LRSP Templates  Local Road Safety plan Template
                        Vision, Mission, Goals Template
                        Meeting Agenda Template
 Potential Stakeholders  Potential Stakeholders
                       State Safety Contacts
 Training  Tutorial - Identify Stakeholders
FHWA-SA-21-033

Local Road 

Safety Plans

A local road safety plan (LRSP) provides a framework for identifying, 

analyzing, and prioritizing roadway safety improvements on local roads. 

The LRSP development process and content are tailored to local issues 

and needs. The process results in a prioritized list of issues, risks, actions, and 

improvements that can be used to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on 

local roads. FHWA has developed several resources including an LRSP DoIt-Yourself website which further explains the process and includes resources 

local agencies and their partners need to create and implement an LRSP.1

1 https://highways.dot.gov/safety/local-rural/local-road-safety-plans

2 Anderson et al. Noteworthy Practices: Addressing Safety on Locally-Owned 

and Maintained Roads A Domestic Scan, FHWA-SA-09-019, (2010). 

3 Developing Safety Plans: A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners, FHWA-SA-12-017, 

provides guidance on developing an LRSP. 

Approximately 75 percent of rural 

roads are owned by local agencies.2 

While local roads are less traveled 

than State highways, they have a 

much higher rate of fatal and serious 

injury crashes.2 Developing an LRSP is 

an effective strategy to improve 

local road safety for all road users 

and support the goals of a State’s 

overall Strategic Highway Safety Plan 

(SHSP).

Although the development process 

and resulting plan can vary 

depending on the local agency’s 

needs, available resources, and 

targeted crash types, aspects 

common to LRSPs include:

• Stakeholder engagement

representing the 4E’s:

engineering,

enforcement,

education, and

emergency

medical services.

• Collaboration

among

municipal,

county, Tribal,

State, and/or

Federal entities

to leverage

expertise and

resources.

• Identification of target crash types

and crash risk with corresponding

recommended proven safety

countermeasures.

• Timeline and goals for

implementation and evaluation.

Local road agencies should consider 

developing an LRSP to be used as a 

tool for reducing roadway fatalities, 

injuries, and crashes.3

 LRSPs can 

help agencies create a prioritized 

list of improvements. LRSPs are 

also a proactive risk management 

technique to demonstrate an 

agency’s responsiveness. The 

plan should be viewed as a living 

document that can be updated to 

reflect changing local needs and 

priorities.

Infographic showing the LRSP process. Source: FHWA

Safety Benefits:

OFFICE OF SAFETY

Proven Safety 

Countermeasures

Agencies have experienced 

the following benefits after 

LRSP implementation:

25%

reduction in county road 

fatalities in Minnesota.

17%

reduction in fatal and 

serious injury crashes on 

county-owned roads in 

Washington State. 

35%

reduction in severe 

curve crashes in Thurston 

County, WA.

For more information on this 

and other FHWA Proven Safety 

Countermeasures, please visit 

https://highways.dot.gov/ 

safety/proven-safety-counter 

measures and https:// 

highways.dot.gov/safety/ 

local-rural/local-roadsafety-plans.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Tommy G. JETT.

No. 60728.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1977.

In re: Tommy G. Jett applying for supervisory writs.

Writ denied: adequate remedy by review in the event of conviction.
#### W. C. BUSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-591.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 7, 1978.

*557Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Joseph R. Atterbury, Legal Intern, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DURANT, Jr., N. JOSEPH, Associate Judge.

We consider here whether or not under the laws of the State of Florida there is such a crime as attempted accessory after the fact.

A person is an accessory after the fact where he maintains, assists or gives an offender any aid, knowing that he committed a felony “with intent that he shall avoid or escape detection, arrest, trial or punishment.” Section 777.03, Florida Statutes (1975). In *Henderson*v. *State,*55 So.2d 110 (Fla.1951), our Supreme Court said that:

> . for the purpose of a similar verdict the words “attempt” and “intent” were synonymous.

And, in the case of *King v. State,*317 So.2d 852 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), the First District made the following pronouncement which is controlling in the case at bar:

> If a crime is itself an attempt to do an act or accomplish a result, there can be no attempt to commit that crime.

It is apparent, therefore, than once an individual attempts to aid a fleeing felon for the purpose of accomplishing the result of helping him avoid detection, then he has actually completed the crime of accessory after the fact.

For the foregoing reasons, we specifically hold that there is no such crime as attempted accessory after the fact, and that the trial judge was correct in refusing to charge the jury on this non-existent crime.

The judgment and sentence rendered by the trial court are, therefore,

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and CROSS, JJ., concur.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

AL-24 CR-13 Lock & Dam Road 

Improvements

Roadway Resurfacing & 

Widening

U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers - Claiborne Lock 

& Dam

Monroe County 

Engineering

Monroe

2017 - 

2018

AL-25 Old Lock No. 1 Park - Phase 1 Roadway Resurfacing

U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers - Black Warrior 

& Tombigbee Lakes

Clarke County 

Commission

Clarke 2017 - 

2018

AL-26 Silver Creek Park - Phase 1 Roadway Resurfacing

U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers - Black Warrior 

& Tombigbee Lakes

Clarke County 

Commission

Clarke 2018

AL-27 Abercrombie Road 

Improvements Roadway Rehabilitation U.S. Forest Service - Talladega National Forest

Bibb County 

Engineering

Bibb 2019

AL-28 Winstson CR 23 & CR 60 

Improvements Roadway Resurfacing U.S. Forest Service - Bankhead National Forest

Winston County 

Commission

Winston 2018 - 

2020

AL-29 Winstson CR 2 (FH 5) 

Improvements Roadway Resurfacing

U.S. Forest Service - 

Bankhead National 

Forest/Black Warrior 

WMA

Winston County 

Commission

Winston 2018 - 

2020

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Alabama Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Alabama FLAP are listed below in no particular order and include:

Alabama Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2017-2020
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

AL-30 Winstson CR 8 (FH 5) 

Improvements Roadway Resurfacing U.S. Forest Service - Bankhead National Forest

Winston County 

Commission

Winston 2018 - 

2020

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The next step in the process will be to develop project agreements between Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division and the State/Local Agency 

partners. The amount of funds allocated will depend on finalizing these project agreements. The Alabama PDC does not have a firm date for the next 

Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please watch our website for updates in your state. https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/flap/

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Stephen Joseph SUDOL, Appellee.

No. 77-1944.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 18, 1978.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender, and Stuart M. Lerner, Asst. Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

There was a potential conflict between decisions in our court in regard to the classification of the crime of attempted burglary. This potential conflict was properly resolved in *Gray v. State,*356 So.2d 848 (Fla. 4 DCA Case No. 77-221 Opinion filed March 14, 1978). Attempted burglary is a third degree felony notwithstanding the dicta in *Bownes v. State,*345 So.2d 787 (Fla. 4 DCA 1977), and the Opin.Atty,Gen. 077-4 (1977).

Therefore, the circuit court order finding it was without jurisdiction to try the appel-lee for the crime of attempted burglary was error and we must reverse and remand for trial.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

MOORE and LETTS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Alí Rodríguez Araque, certify that:

1.    I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A.;

2.    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|                                                                                                |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: October 24, 2003                                                                          |  | 
|/s/ALÍ RODRÍGUEZ ARAQUEName: Alí Rodríguez Araque
Title: President(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 

---

QuickLinks