alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





I,
      Albert
      W. Weggeman, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Stamford Industrial Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
      financial condition and results of operations of Net Perceptions, Inc.





Date:
              August
              14, 2007
            By:
            /s/
              Albert W. Weggeman, Jr.Name:Albert
                W. Weggeman, Jr.
              Title:President
                and Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





I,
      Jonathan LaBarre, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Stamford Industrial Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained
      in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of Stamford Industrial Group,
      Inc.




Date:
              August
              11, 2008
            By:
            /s/
              Jonathan LaBarreName:Jonathan
              LaBarre
              Title:  
                Chief
                Financial Officer, Secretary and
                Treasurer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
258 La. 351

#### Virginia Carroll CREED v. Earl W. MORIARTY, Jr.

No. 51297.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 14, 1971.

In re: Earl William Moriarty, Jr. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 244 So.2d 286.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26571]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ASSASSINATION RECORDS REVIEW BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE: October 14, 1997.
PLACE: ARRB, 600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.
STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Review and Accept Minutes of Closed Meeting
    2. Review of Assassination Records
    3. Other Business

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen Sullivan, Press Officer, 
600 E Street, NW, Second Floor, Washington, DC 20530. Telephone: (202) 
724-0088; Fax: (202) 724-0457.
T. Jeremy Gunn,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-26571 Filed 10-2-97; 3:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 6118-01-P
### IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

20 2 3 WY 45

April Term, A.D. 20 2 3

May 10, 2023

DAVID A

. GARRISON,

Appellant

(Defendant),

v.

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee

(Plaintiff). S

- 23

- 0017



### O RDER 

### A FFIRMING THE 

### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### ’ S 

### J UDGMENT AND 

### S ENTENCE

[¶ 1 ] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that

A ppellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court

. Appellant

entered an unconditional guilty plea to one count of possession of marijuana, a third or

subsequent offense felony. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35

- 7

- 1031(c)(i) (A)

. Th e district court

imposed a sentence of one to three years

. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district

court’s November 30 , 20 2 2

, Sentenc e

.

[¶2] On March 9 , 20 2 3 , Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate counsel e

- filed a Motion

to Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). T his Court subseque ntly entered an Order Granting

Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief. This Court ordered that, on or before

April 24 , 20 2 3

, Appellant was permitted to file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the

issues he would like the Court to consider in this appeal. This Court also provided notice

that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would make its ruling on

counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, m ake a final decision on this appeal.

Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted.[¶3] Now, f ollowing a careful review of the record and the Anders brief submitted by

appellate counsel, this Court finds appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be

granted and the district court’s Sentenc e should be a ffirmed. It is, therefore,

[¶4] ORDERED that the caption in this appeal has been amended to be consistent with

the district court’s caption regard ing Appellant’s middle name; and it is further

[¶ 5 ] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court

- appointed counsel

for A ppellant David A

. Garrison , is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for

A ppellant; and it is fur ther

[¶ 6 ] ORDERED that the Crook County D istrict C ourt’s Novembe r 3 0 , 202 2

, Sentence

be , and the same h ereby is , affirmed.

[¶ 7 ] DATED this 10 th day of May

, 20 2 3

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

KATE M

. FOX

Chief Justice
##### 



Exhibit 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seminis, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfonso Romo Garza,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(a) and (b), as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                               
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Alfonso Romo Garza
Alfonso Romo Garza
Chief Executive Officer
May 12, 2003
|
| |  |
Gormas, Michael (OST)

Gormas, Michael (OST)

Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:44 AM

Dennis Plautz (dennis@greaterfortdodge.com); Eric Bookmeyer; posgood@netconx.net;

j'.,. j i: (I fort Dodge, Airport Manager, RhondaChambers; Fort Dodge, City Manager, David

, , '~"-Fierke; Fort Dodge, Mayor, Matt Bemrich

shane@airchoiceone.com; Mike Matthews; chowell@flygreatlakes.com;

dvoss@flygreatlakes.com; Darnea Wood; Cindy Stork; Devany, Dennis (OST); Schlemmer,

Kevin (OST)

Essential Air Service at Fort Dodge and Mason City

Air Choice One Proposal at Fort Dodge Mason City Iowa Docket DOT-OST-2001-10682

DOT-OST-2001-10684 (Final).pdf; Great Lakes proposal FOD-MCW-MSP Bid 2014 as of

06-02-14 FinaLpdf

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Hello everyone,

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Fort Dodge and Mason City, lA, as well as give

you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary

for Aviation and International Affairs.

We issued Order 2014-4-22 (April 22, 2014), re-requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EASfor a new

term. In response to our request, two air carriers submitted proposals: Air Choice One and Great Lakes Aviation.

I have attached each air carrier's proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov

sometime today. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible,

but no later than Wednesday, July 2, 2014. Please send your comments directly via e-mail to

michaeLgormas@dot.gov. Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution

list.

Please direct all questions regarding these proposals to Michael Gormas at michaeLgormas@dot.gov.

Michael D. Gormas

United States Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis

1200 New Jersey Ave SE

Washington, DC 20590

202.366.1853

1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26600]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-427-001]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

October 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 29, 1997, Williams Natural Gas 
Company (WNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 256. The proposed 
effective date of this tariff sheet is October 29, 1997.
    WNG states that it made a filing on July 23, 1997 to request a 
waiver of the reporting requirements in Article 14.2 (g) of its tariff. 
By order issued September 16, 1997, the Commission granted the waiver, 
but directed WNG to file a revised tariff sheet within 15 days of the 
issuance of the order to eliminate the inconsistency in the filing 
dates caused by its existing tariff. The instant filing is being made 
in compliance with the order.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all participants 
listed on the service lists maintained by the Commission in the dockets 
referenced above and on all of WNG's jurisdictional customers and 
interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26600 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
255 La. 422

#### Antonia COMPASS, Divorced Wife of Alphonse PICOU v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS of the State of Louisiana, Boh Brothers Construction Company, Inc., and the Travelers Insurance Company.

No. 50029.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1970.

Cox, Bagot & Huppenbauer, Henry L. Klein, New Orleans, for appellant.

Philip K. Jones, Norman L. Sisson, Baton Rouge, Jesse S. Guillot, New Orleans, for appellees.

Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, Ernest A. Carrere, Jr., New Orleans, amici curiae.

BARHAM, Justice.

Alleging damage to her property caused by the construction of Interstate 10 through New Orleans, Mrs. Antonia Compass Picou brought this suit against the Department of Highways of the State of Louisiana; Boh Brothers Construction Company, Inc., the Department’s contractor, and Travelers Insurance Company, Boh’s liability insurer. The Department filed exceptions of no cause and no right of action, the basis of which was its allegation of governmental immunity from such an action and from liability. The trial judge dismissed the suit on one or both of these exceptions, and the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, affirmed under the exception of no right of action on the ground of governmental immunity. 224 So.2d 102.

Decisions from the Courts of Appeal of this state have caused some conflict and *375confusion on the ‘question of whether the Department of Highways has immunity from suit. We recently put this question to rest in our decisions in Herrin v. Perry and Perry v. Herrin, decided November 10, 1969, 254 La. 933, 228 So.2d 649, and Reymond v. State through Department of Highways, 255 La. 425, 231 So.2d 375. In Herrin v. Perry, a delictual action, this court concluded that R.S. 48:22 and Article 3, Section 35, of our Constitution, taken together, operated as a general waiver of the Department’s immunity from suit. In Rey-mond we held that this was a waiver of immunity from suit and liability in all actions. See also Bazanac v. State of Louisiana through Department of Highways, 255 La. 418, 231 So.2d 373, with which the instant case was consolidated in this court for argument on the question of governmental immunity.

For the reasons assigned in the cases cited above, the judgments of the district court and the Court of Appeal are annulled and set aside, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings according to law and consistent with this opinion. Assessment of costs is to await final disposition of this litigation.
#### Irvin BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-9.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 1970.

Robert P. Miller, Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Horace A. Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction of breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor which was entered upon a guilty plea. Originally, appellant was charged with committing a more grievous offense, breaking and entering with the intent to commit a felony; to wit, grand larceny, to which charge he had pled not guilty. Obviously, his ultimate guilty plea to the lesser charge was entered in consideration for the reduction of charges against him by the State. Our examination of the record on appeal con-vmces us that the judgment of conviction herein appealed is free of error and should therefore be affirmed. See opinion of this court filed June 11, 1970, in Ward v. State, 236 So.2d 187.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Remedent  USA,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen F. Ross, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant to   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/  Stephen  F.  Ross
----------------------
Stephen  F.  Ross
Chief  Financial  Officer
November  13,  2002
#### Mildred P. FISHER, Petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL PANCAKE HOUSE et al., Respondents.

No. 40917.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 19, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28108]



[[Page 55227]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-97-002]


Chandeleur Pipe Line Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

October 17, 1997.
    Take notice on October 14, 1997, Chandeleur Pipe Line Company 
(Chandeleur) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, Second Substitute Seventh Revised Sheet No. 5, 
with an effective date of October 1, 1997.
    Chandeleur states that the filing is being made to correct its 
September 12, 1997 filing. Chandeleur states that it is replacing one 
of the two maximum rate columns with the appropriate minimum rate 
column consistent with the effective Sixth Revised Sheet No. 5.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211. All such 
protests should be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28108 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Ralph A. HAUSER, John C. Sproat, Emmanuel H. Knowles, Robert Dugdale, Emerson C. Church, individually and as Commissioners of the City of Deerfield Beach, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, and Robert J. Wayne, individually and as City Manager for the City of Deerfield Beach, Florida, Appellants, v. Charles MICHAELS and Charles Bytheway, Appellees.

No. 2558.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

June 25, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.4

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

    The undersigned, Timothy E. McKenna, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Keystone Property Trust, (the "Registrant"), does hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based upon a review of our 2002 Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 of the Registrant, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report").

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: March 27, 2003

                                          /s/ Timothy E. McKenna
                                          Senior Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
# San Joaquin Valley

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

# 90 9, HEALTHY AIR LIVING"

December 26, 2012 Mr. James Goldstene Executive Officer California Air Resources Board 1001 "1" Street P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812 Dear Mr. James Goldstene: Enclosed is the State Implementation Plan (SIP) Package for the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) 2012 PM2.5 Plan. The District Governing Board adopted the 2012 PM2.5 Plan at a public hearing held on December 20, 2012. We request that the California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit this plan and the appropriate documentation to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a SIP revision. Included in this SIP Package are the following attachments: 1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 2. The 2012 PM2.5 Plan with Appendices 3. Evidence of Public Hearing 4. Governing Board Resolution Adopting the 2012 PM2.5 Plan 5. Governing Board Memo 6. CEQA Initial Study and Negative Declaration If you have any questions regarding this plan, please contact Jessica Fierro by e-mail at Jessica.Fierro a

(D.valleyair.org or at (559) 230-5800. The District thanks you and your staff for your assistance. Since ely,

Sheikh Director of Strategies and Incentives

Attachments cc: S. Vanderspek
#### William Olin BALL v. Wilma WALDROP.

No. 50425.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 22, 1978.

Stribling & King, F. Kent Stribling, Jackson, for appellant.

Michael B. Martz, Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; William F. Coleman, Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J, SMITH, P. J., and WALKER, J.

AFFIRMED.
1 200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590 

In Reply Refer to: HCR-20 

DOT# 2020-0027 

JAN 2 1 2020 

Subject: Dismissal of Complaint DOT# 2020-0027 

This 

Deru

letter is to inform you that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Civil 

Rights has determined that it will dismiss the above complaint, which alleges violations that may 

be related to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the U.S. Department of Transportation 

(USDOT) Title VI implementation regulations at 49 C.F.R. Part 21 and/or FH WA 's Title Vl 

regulations at 23 C.F.R. Part 200 (hereinafter Title VI). Title VI prohibits discrimination on the 

basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial 

assistance. 

To be accepted for investigation, a complaint must meet the jurisdictional requirements provided 

by 49 C.F.R. § 21.11, as well as the legal standards discussed in the U.S. Depa1tment of Justice 

Title YI Legal Manual. first, complaints must be filed within 180 calendar days of the alleged 

discriminatory act, unless the time for filing is extended by FHW A. Second, the matters must 

concern recipients of federal financial assistance for a program or programs authorized under a 

law administered by FHW A. Finally, the complaint must describe an alleged discriminatory act 

or acts that, if true, would fall under FHW A's jurisdiction and potentially violate FHW A's Title 

VI regulations. 

You allege the Texas Depru1

:ment of Transportation (TxDOT) violated Title VI by intentionally 

discriminating against you and your firm, Specifically, you allege that a 

TxDOT employee harassed �mployees on several occasions in October 2019. You further 

allege this TxDOT employee contacted another company to harm -s reputation. 

After careful consideration, FHWA will dismiss this complaint because the matter is currently 

under investigation by the TxDOT Human Resources Division. FHWA notes that nothing in this 

letter precludes you or another complainant from filing a Title V[ complaint related to this matter 

upon the conclusion of TxDOT's investigation. 

If you have any questions, please contact Nichole Mc Whortcr at (202) 366-1396. 
Title VI Team Leader 

Office ofCivil Rights 

cc: Al Alonzi, Division Administrator, FHWA Texas Division Office 

Marcus Wilner, Division ChiefOperating Officer, FHW A Texas Di vision Office 

Mark Arrington, Civil Rights Specialist, FHWA Texas Division Office 

Jim Esselman, Senior Attorney-Advisor, FHWA Office ofChief Counsel 

Yvette Rivera, Associate Director, Equal Employment Opportunity Programs Division, 

Departmental Office ofCivil Rights 

Kevin Resler, National Title VI Program Coordinator, FHWA Office ofCi vii Rights 

Page 2 of 2