alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Esther M. JOHNSON v. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE.

No. 8674.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 11, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 14, 1978.

*767Guy M. Huard, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael A. Starks, Asst. City Atty., Philip S. Brooks, City Atty., for defendant-appel-lee.

Before GULOTTA, BEER and BOWES, JJ.

BOWES, Judge.

Plaintiff, a control clerk of the Bureau of Food Stamps, Department of Finance, appeals from the affirmance of her dismissal by the New Orleans Civil Service Commission. Plaintiff was dismissed for insubordination and belligerence to her immediate supervisor and the administrator of the Bureau.

The record reflects that on June 17, 1975 the supervisor requested the administrator to transfer plaintiff to another Bureau or to another job within the Bureau because of repeated mathematical errors made on reports which had to be forwarded to the State.

The administrator called plaintiff to confer with her and the supervisor relative to the problem. Several weeks earlier the three of them had a previous conference relative to the errors. The problem was again explained to plaintiff and she became very excited and agitated. She asked both of them if they were crazy and dashed out into the secretarial area using profanity and hollering as she went.

The administrator followed plaintiff requesting her to return to his office so they might discuss the matter rationally, but she refused, creating a scene in front of the other employees and clients as she left.

Because of what had transpired the administrator terminated plaintiff for insubordination and disrespect and informed her by letter that day of her termination.

The jurisprudential guidelines controlling appeals of this nature are firmly established to the effect that the findings of fact of the Civil Service Commission are binding on the court when supported by the record (as is the case here), and the court may not substitute its conclusion on the facts for that of the Commission. It has been held that only where there is no evidence to support the ruling of the Commission, the court may reverse its decision.1*768We conclude the Commission had sufficient evidence to support its conclusion that appellant’s termination was justified.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

*AFFIRMED.*

1

. *Leggett v. Northwestern State College,*242 La. 927, 140 So.2d 5; *Mauboules v. Louisiana Wild Life & Fisheries Com’n.,*La.App., 312 So.2d 899; *Bennett v. Division of Administration,*La.App., 307 So.2d 118; *Biggio v. Department of Safety and Permits,*La.App., 299 So.2d 504.
[4910-I3-JP]

Ul'ING SYMBOL

DATE

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule. I "

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list .~

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airwlrthiness information (MeAl) I"'w",----

originated by an aviation authority of another country tolidentifY and correct an unsafe F\ftrNCiSYMBOL

"ITIALSiSIG

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes t e unsafe condition as:

. I r~m -

In the past, some operators have reported difficulties to pressurise L

the hydraulic reservoirs, due to leakage ofthb Crissair reservoir air ~""MIlOL

pressurisation check valves. * * * The leakage of the check valves

was caused by an incorrect spring material. llhe affected Crissair

check valves * * * were then replaced with itnproved check valves

PIN [part number] 2S2794-1 * * *.

Ainvorthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 Series Airplanes; Model A300 B4-600,

I

B4-600R, F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model C4-605R Variant F Airplanes

I

(Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes); and All 0 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Admini.stration (FAA), Dcbartment of Transportation

RlN 2120-AA64

Federal Aviation Administ.-ation

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

I\-N)"( -

NITlALSISJG

{.u.r- 14 CFR Part 39 ~

'1('l.{IO

(Docket No. FAA-20ID-DInj Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-189-AD; Amendmen U1INGSYMElOL

Jr,~g lI-bO ·l\Nu-(

39-•.•.H "-; AD20]O-~l N

More recently. similar issues were again reported on aeroplanes

with Crissair check valves PIN 2S2794-1 insb1Jed. The

investigations * * * have shown that a spring, mounted inside the

valve, does not meet the Airbus type design Specifications.
Exhibit 13.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
       (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                              United States Code)

      Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Grupo Radio Centro, S.A. de C.V., a sociedad anonima
de capital variable organized under the laws of Mexico (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
(the "Form 20-F") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  July 1, 2004                        /s/ Carlos Aguirre Gomez
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Carlos Aguirre Gomez
                                           General Director

Date:  July 1, 2004                        /s/ Pedro Beltran Nasr
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Pedro Beltran Nasr
                                           Chief Financial Officer
#### David A. UNVERSAW and Adeline R. Unversaw, his wife, Dwight E. Miller and Martha L. Miller, his wife, Arnold H. Olsen and Evelyn B. Olsen, his wife, Harry Spadoni and Vera Spadoni, his wife, Lucien Choquette and Wanda Choquette, his wife, Appellants, v. BROWARD COUNTY BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT, Jess Yoho and D. W. Roberson, Trustee, a/k/a D. Wayne Roberson, Appellees.

No. 69-576.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 12, 1971.

James A. Week, of Week, Stone & Barrs, Pompano Beach, for appellants.

John U. Lloyd, County Atty., and Betty Lynn Lee, Asst. County Atty., Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee-Broward County Building and Zoning Department.

Frank C. Adler, of Tolar & Adler, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees-Yoho and Roberson.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the records and briefs and have considered the arguments of counsel and are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and REED, JJ., and WILLIAMS, ROBERT L., Associate Judge, concur.
EXHIBIT 99.2
                           ============

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Natalma Industries, Inc.
(Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004,
asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Derick Sinclair, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Registrant,
 hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of Registrant.


Date: November 13, 2004        /s/ Derick Sinclair
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer, Chief
                              Chief Financial Officer and
                              Principal Accounting Officer of
                              Natalma Industries, Inc., Registrant
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Small Cap Core Fund, a series of DWS Investment Trust, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| May 29, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark                                       |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|         | Michael G. Clark                                          |
|         | President                                                 |
|         | DWS Small Cap Core Fund, a series of DWS Investment Trust |

 

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Small Cap Core Fund, a series of DWS Investment Trust, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| May 29, 2009 | /s/Paul Schubert                                          |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|         | Paul Schubert                                             |
|         | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer                     |
|         | DWS Small Cap Core Fund, a series of DWS Investment Trust |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51661-51662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 17, 1997.

[[Page 51662]]

    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Karen L. Grandstrand, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-2171:
    1. Richard Paul Pederson, II, Page, North Dakota; to acquire 
additional voting shares of Page Bank Holding Company, Page, North 
Dakota, and thereby indirectly acquire Page State Bank, Page, North 
Dakota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Sptember 29, 
1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-26174 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
Scott, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
                                        August 11, 2006
Exhibit 31.1
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Donald R. Katz, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Audible, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(3) and 15d-115(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 
 a) A ll significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting
  August ___, 2003
By:
/s/Name:
Donald R. KatzTitle:
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Eugene O. C. AUSTIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 39371.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 10, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed. 229 So.2d 19.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM  THE
     CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-K
     OF  RC/ARBY'S  CORPORATION  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1997 AND  IS
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.      
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                          10,463
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,991
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,685 
<INVENTORY>                                     12,444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,018
<PP&E>                                          20,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,254
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,248
<BONDS>                                        279,606
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (86,861)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,476
<SALES>                                        221,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               287,310
<CGS>                                          100,470
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,892
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,748
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,932
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (184)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,800)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,984)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

In connection with the quarterly report of Quepasa Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John Abbott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2009

|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ JOHN ABBOTT              
|John Abbott                  
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
#### CORBETT MOTOR SUPPLY, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, a municipal corporation created by and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-136.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 17, 1971.

George N. Diamantis, of Sanders, Mc-Ewan, Mims & McDonald, Orlando, for petitioners.

Michael W. Melvin, of van den Berg, Gay, Burke & Dyer, Orlando, for respondent.

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In an opinion filed November 6, 1970, we reversed an order of the circuit court requiring petitioner, condemnee in an eminent domain proceeding, to produce for inspection and copying or photographing appraisals, reports, work sheets, data and other information gathered by its appraisers.

By petition for rehearing, respondent has brought to our attention the decision of the Supreme Court of Florida in Pinellas County v. Carlson et al., 242 So.2d 714, filed December 9, 1970.

Specifically we are referred to the following language in that opinion:

> “ * * * The fair rule is that the State may not initiate discovery in condemnation cases, except as a reciprocal right in those cases when the condemnee has elected to discover the State’s work product. Those condemnees who do not wish to explore the State’s information should not be exposed to discovery; the policies underlying the *Shell*decision cannot logically be extended to reach such a result * * *

> “ * * * the State’s interest is sufficiently and fairly protected if its right of discovery is restricted to those cases in which the condemnee has elected to seek discovery under *Shell.”*

Since the fact situation contemplated by the Supreme Court in Pinellas County v. Carlson is precisely the same as the situation in the case at bar, the petition for rehearing is granted without oral argument and our opinion of November 6, 1970, is withdrawn. Moreover, as it now appears that petitioner has not demonstrated a departure from the essential requirements of law, certiorari is denied.

Certiorari denied.

CROSS, C. J., REED, J., and McCAIN, DAVID L., Associate Judge, concur.
#### Thelma LEONARD, et al. v. ALBANY MACHINE & SUPPLY CO., et al.

No. 8251.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

March 15, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 19, 1971.

Writ Granted June 2,1971.

Ronald F. Plaisance and N. A. Danna, Jr., New Orleans, for appellants.

John A. Vivins, of Mouton, Roy, Carmouche & Hailey, Lafayette, for ap-pellees.

Before LANDRY, ELLIS and BLANCHE, JJ.

LANDRY, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in Fisher v. Albany Machine & Supply Co. et al., La.App., 246 So.2d 218, this day decided, the judgment of the trial court sustaining the motion for summary judgment by defendant, Wagner Electric Corporation, and dismissing plaintiff-appellant’s action as to defendant, Wagner Electric Corporation, is affirmed, at appellant’s cost.

Affirmed.