alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9

__________________ _______________________________________________________________________ 1920 Ballenger Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 - 2898 Telephone: (703) 683 - 4646 Fax: (703) 683 - 4745

Dedicated to the advancement of the international helicopter community w ww.rotor. org July 16, 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M
- 30 West Building Ground Floor Room W 12
- 140 1200 New Jersey

Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Filed Via Regulations.gov Re: Petition for Extension of Exemption: Exemption No. 6175 I , Docket No. FAA

- 2001
- 9195 Dear Mr. Administrator; On September 29, 1995, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted Exemption No. 6175 to Helicopter Association International (HAI) and the Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) (“the Petitioners”). This exemption, from 14 CFR § 135.213(a), was granted “to the limited extent necessary to permit helicopter EMS departures, under IFR, in weather that is at or above VFR minimums, from airports or heliports at which a weather report is not available from the U.S. National Weather Service, a source approved b y the NWS, or a source approved b y t he Administrator,” subject to certain conditions and limitations. On June 17, 1997, August 29, 2000, August 23, 2001, June 6, 2 003, June 22, 2005, September 12, 2007, July

30, 2009, and August 26, 2013, Exemption No. 6175 was extended; Exemption No.6175 will expire by

its own terms on September 30, 2015. The conditions and circumstances pursuant to which Exemption No. 6175 was or ig inally granted remain unchanged. Experience with Exemption No. 6175 demonstrates that the public interest is served and a level of safety equivalent to the regulation is maintained when properl y trained air medical service pilots are permitted to perform air medical services (EMS) departures, under IFR, in weather that is at or above VFR minimums, from airports or heliports at which a weather report is not available. From the U.S. Weather Service, a source approved b y the NWS, or a source approved b y t he Administrator.Dedicated to the advancement of the international helicopter community.

Pursuant to 14 CFR §11.25, good cause exists to waive publication of this petition for extension of exemption in the F

e deral Regis t er , because the extension , if granted, would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition w ould be a detriment to the Petitioners and the public. Therefore, HAI and AAMS petition the Administrator to extend Exemption No. 6175 for an additional two y ear term, or for such longer term as the Administrator may deem appropriate. The Petitioners fur ther ask the Administrator to find that good cause exists to waive publication. Questions or comments concerning this petition for extension of exemption may be directed to the undersigned or to David York, Vice President of Regulations and International Affairs, HAI, at the address above. Sincerely,

Matthew S. Zuccaro President & COO cc: Mr. Rick Sherlock, President and CEO, AAMS
# L_2005077EN.01001301.xml

| 23.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 77/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 77/13

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 8 March 2005

concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (Seventh EDF) for the financial year 2003

(2005/255/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Fourth ACP-EC Convention, signed at Lomé on 15 December 1989, as amended by the Agreement signed at Mauritius on 4 November 1995,

Having regard to Internal Agreement 91/401/EEC on the financing and administration of Community aid under the fourth ACP-EEC Convention (1), setting up, amongst others, the Seventh European Development Fund (Seventh EDF) and in particular Article 33(3) thereof,

Having regard to the Financial Regulation of 29 July 1991 applicable to development finance cooperation under the Fourth ACP-EEC Convention (2), and in particular Articles 69 to 77 thereof,

Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the Seventh EDF as at 31 December 2003 and the Court of Auditors’ Report concerning the financial year 2003 together with the Commission’s replies (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 33(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the Seventh EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 33(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the Seventh EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council.

| (2) | The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the Seventh EDF during the financial year 2003 has been satisfactory, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the Seventh EDF during the financial year 2003 has been satisfactory,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the Seventh EDF for the financial year 2003.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2005.

For the Council

The President

J.-C. JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 229, 17.8.1991, p. 288.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 266, 21.9.1991, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 293, 30.11.2004, p. 315.

3

---
### Public and industrial water supplies of the eastern coal field region, Kentucky

By: John Augustus BakerWilliam Evans Price

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir369

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53830-53831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-10-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

October 9, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 7, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch), P.O. Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77251-1478, filed in Docket No. 
CP98-10-000 a request pursuant to sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 
157.211) for approval to operate as a jurisdictional facility a four-
inch tap and three-meter station placed into service under section 
311(a) of the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA) and section 284.3(c) of the 
Commission's regulations, under Koch's blanket certificate issued in 
Docket No. CP82-430-000, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas 
Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth in the request which is on file

[[Page 53831]]

with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Koch asserts that the proposed certification of facilities will 
enable Koch to provide transportation services under its blanket 
transportation certificate through a tap serving Entex, Inc. (Entex), a 
local distribution company, in Harris County, Texas. Koch states that 
the estimated average day and peak day requirements for this delivery 
point are 600 MMBtu and 3,600 MMBtu, respectively. Koch further states 
that such volumes will be transported pursuant to either, or a 
combination of Koch's Firm Transportation (FTS) or No Notice 
Transportation Service (NNS) rate schedules. Koch further asserts that 
the tap and meter station cost approximately $40,000.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days of the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27334 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[111th Congress Public Law 324]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 3536]]

Public Law 111-324
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To reauthorize and enhance Johanna's Law to increase public awareness 
  and knowledge with respect to gynecologic cancers. <<NOTE: Dec. 22, 
                         2010 -  [H.R. 2941]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF JOHANNA'S LAW.

    (a) In General.--Section 317P(d) of the Public Health Service Act 
(42 U.S.C. 247b-17(d)(4)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4), by inserting after ``2009'' the 
        following: ``and $18,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2012 
        through 2014''; and
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (6).

    (b) Consultation With Nonprofit Gynecologic Cancer Organizations.--
Section 317P(d) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 247b-17(d)), as amended by 
subsection (a), is further amended by inserting after paragraph (3) the 
following:
            ``(4) Consultation with nonprofit gynecologic cancer 
        organizations.--In carrying out the national campaign under this 
        subsection, the Secretary shall consult with nonprofit 
        gynecologic cancer organizations, with a mission both to conquer 
        ovarian or other gynecologic cancer and to provide outreach to 
        State and local governments and communities, for the purpose of 
        determining the best practices for providing gynecologic cancer 
        information and outreach services to varied populations.''.

    Approved December 22, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2941:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111-635 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Sept. 28, 29, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 10, considered and passed Senate, amended.
            Dec. 16, House concurred in Senate amendment.

                                  <all>
```
| **Exhibit 13.1** |
|------------------|

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Annual Report”) for the purposes of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Sebastián Eskenazi, the Chief Executive Officer, Guillermo Reda, the Chief Financial Officer and Ángel Ramos Sánchez, the Director of Administration and Tax of YPF Sociedad Anónima, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

|   | 1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of YPF Sociedad Anónima. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: April 12, 2011

|        | By:    | /s/ Sebastián Eskenazi                                                          |  |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|   |   |                                                                                      |
|        |   | Name: Sebastián Eskenazi        Title: Chief Executive Officer                  |
|   |   |                                                                                 |
|        | By:    | /s/ Guillermo Reda                                                                   |
|   |   |                                                                                      |
|   |   | Name: Guillermo Reda        Title: Chief Financial Officer                           |
|   |   |                                                                                 |
|        | By:    | /s/ Ángel Ramos Sánchez                                                    |
|   |   |                                                                                      |
|        |   | Name: Ángel Ramos Sánchez        Title: Director of Administration and Tax |
EX 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Lucien R. Paquette, certify that:



1.

I have received this quarterly report of Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended August 31, 2003 of The Bralorne Mining Company, the registrant;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, other than financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c.

presented in this quarterly report our conclusion about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal control; and



b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regards to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated:

June 9, 2004

/s/Lucien R. Paquette



Lucien R. Paguette,

Chief Financial Officer



Chief Accounting Officer

Secretary Treasurer and Director
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 30, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00694-CR

BRODERICK RECHARD STOKES, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 337th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1159870 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant Broderick Rechard Stokes pleaded guilty to theft. The trial court 

sentenced him on May 21, 2008, to 300 days’ confinement in state jail. Appellant 

filed a notice of appeal from the judgment on July 27, 2018. 

We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not 

filed timely. A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after 

sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See

Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements 
2

of Rule 26.2 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 

981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a 

court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. 

Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed more than ten years after the sentence 

was imposed. Therefore, the appeal was not timely perfected. 

Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Donovan, Wise, and Jewell.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 13.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
              (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
                        of Title 18, United States Code)

      Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Grupo Radio Centro, S.A. de C.V., a sociedad anonima
de capital variable organized under the laws of Mexico (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
(the "Form 20-F") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2004                              /s/ Carlos Aguirre Gomez
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Carlos Aguirre Gomez
                                                 General Director

Date: June 30, 2004                              /s/ Pedro Beltran Nasr
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Pedro Beltran Nasr
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE ex rel. John W. BUSTER v. Wilson E. PURDY, Sheriff.

No. 38400.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of GB Holdings.,
Inc., GB Property Funding Corp. and Greate Bay Hotel and Casino, Inc.
(collectively, the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Douglas S. Niethold, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Douglas S. Niethold
    -----------------------
Name: Douglas S. Niethold
      Interim Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 21, 2004
      --------------





                                       1