Page 1 of 56

MISSOURI

2019 ANNUAL REPORT
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 2 of 56

Table of Contents

Table of Contents.................................................................................................................................. 2

Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................. 3

Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Structure................................................................................................................................. 5

Program Administration..................................................................................................................... 5

Program Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 7

Project Implementation .......................................................................................................................17

Funds Programmed.........................................................................................................................17

General Listing of Projects ..............................................................................................................19

Safety Performance ............................................................................................................................30

General Highway Safety Trends......................................................................................................30

Safety Performance Targets............................................................................................................36

Applicability of Special Rules...........................................................................................................38

Evaluation ...........................................................................................................................................39

Program Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................39

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements .......................................................40

Project Effectiveness.......................................................................................................................44

Compliance Assessment.....................................................................................................................51
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 3 of 56

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject 

to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other 

purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed 

in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.”

23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, 

or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety 

enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway 

crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any 

highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid 

highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court 

proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence 

at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.”
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 4 of 56

Executive Summary

The Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety and the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) are 

dedicated to improving safety of the motoring public through education, engineering, enforcement and 

emergency medical services initiatives. Safety is one of the Department’s core values: "Be Safe." This 

message is also reinforced in the Department’s Practical Design Guide that states, "Safety will not be 

compromised. Every project we do will make the facility safer after its completion." Additionally, "keeping our 

customers and ourselves safe" is a MoDOT Tangible Result.

Missouri's Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is driven by the state's Strategic Highway Safety Plan 

(SHSP). In October 2016, Missouri introduced its fourth edition of the SHSP and established a highway safety 

goal of 700 or fewer fatalities by 2020. Missouri’s Blueprint: A Partnership to Zero Deaths guides the State’s 

safety initiatives and addresses safety from a comprehensive standpoint including engineering, enforcement, 

education, emergency medical services, technology and public policy solutions. The Blueprint focuses on 

implementing strategies that will reduce both fatal and serious injuries on Missouri roadways. The Blueprint 

and the statewide fatality goal are considered in the development and implementation of each of the 

Department’s highway safety plans.

Evidenced-based decision-making is paramount to a sound safety program. Data analysis is a critical part of 

identifying overrepresented crash types, locations, driver age, driver gender, and driver behaviors. These 

findings guide the deployment of effective and appropriate strategies to improve safety on the entire system. 

Efforts are made to analyze fatal and serious injury crashes to help discern where limited safety funding should 

be applied so that maximum safety improvements and benefits are attained.

Fatalities reached a low point in 2013 with 757 fatalities and climbed to 947 in 2016. A similar increasing trend 

occurred for serious injuries which climbed from 4573 in 2015 to 4887 in 2017. This increasing trend in 

fatalities and serious injuries has since been halted and Missouri is now seeing a decreasing number of 

fatalities and serious injuries. In 2018, there were 921 fatalities and 4708 serious injuries on Missouri 

roadways. This decreasing trend could be attributed to the systemic initiatives and high benefit spot treatments 

being deployed as part of Missouri's HSIP program as well as other efforts to change the safety culture of 

Missouri's motorists.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 5 of 56

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of 

achieving a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 

148(h) and 23 CFR 924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to 

advance HSIP implementation and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the 

HSIP Reporting Guidance dated December 29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, 

progress in implementing highway safety improvement projects, progress in achieving safety 

outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the improvements and compliance assessment.

Program Structure

Program Administration

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

The overall HSIP is administered by MoDOT's Highway Safety and Traffic Division. However, the division does 

not typically identify individual projects as part of this process. Instead, HSIP funds are distributed to each of 

MoDOT's seven districts based on a three-year average of the number of fatalities and serious injuries. From 

there, each district identifies how their share of HSIP funds will be programmed in accordance with Missouri's 

SHSP and MoDOT guidance. The districts carry out the projects to completion, and all HSIP projects are 

reported by the Highway Safety and Traffic Division. Occasionally, statewide safety projects may be carried out 

by the Highway Safety and Traffic Division. Missouri's HSIP is primarily developed by MoDOT. However, since 

the state's SHSP involves input from external stakeholders throughout the state, the HSIP is influenced by 

external partners as well.

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Operations

The Highway Safety and Traffic Division leads the HSIP reporting effort. The District Traffic Offices facilitate 

the selection of HSIP projects and implement the HSIP program.

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

• Formula via Districts/Regions

The Highway Safety and Traffic Division also have some HSIP funds distributed to them.

In January of 2018, the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission approved the use of a new formula 

for distributing safety funds to MoDOT's Districts. This new formula places more focus on areas where fatalities 

and serious injuries are occurring. This new distribution will take effect in 2021.

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP. 

Our local roads are included in the crash data system analysis. We evaluate all roadways in the state and 

place emphasis on severe crashes. This analysis is performed for both intersections and non-intersection 

locations. To date we have used an analysis method, which places weight on the severe crashes and locations 

that have experienced a higher frequency of severe crashes and are often those that will find their way on our 
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 6 of 56

locations of interest list. While most of the locations to date have been on the state system roadways, we have 

recently seen a few of the local roads locations make these lists. While we continue to believe that the majority 

of the problem locations will be state system locations, we have evaluated non-state system severe crash 

locations and have determined that 53% of our non-state system fatalities are in seven counties (Jackson, 

Jefferson, Greene, Boone, St. Charles, St. Louis City, and St. Louis County). Local strategic highway safety 

plans (SHSP) have been developed for the top counties experiencing severe crashes. The local SHSPs 

identify systemic countermeasures and projects. We also communicate the locations of interest to planning 

entities like our Metropolitan Planning Organizations and Regional Planning Commissions.

We also work with our LTAP center to continue to move safety forward in our state. Beginning this fiscal year, 

MoDOT will be piloting a Safety Circuit Rider program through the LTAP center. This would provide an safety 

expert to work with local agencies that may not have the staff required to develop a local road safety plan or 

identify safety countermeasures for issues in there areas.

Additionally, we have used the RSA process to better address local road issues on occasion, we have a 

Transportation Engineering Assistance Program (TEAP) to assist locals, and we also have a subcommittee 

from our SHSP that focuses on infrastructure improvement opportunities for local roads.

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) 

Bureaus, Divisions) are involved with HSIP planning. 

• Design

• Districts/Regions

• Governors Highway Safety Office

• Maintenance

• Operations

• Planning

• Traffic Engineering/Safety

There is some overlap in these selections with the way MoDOT is structured. Traffic engineering/safety could 

be included under operations, however operations is more inclusive in other traffic areas that both were 

selected.

Describe coordination with internal partners. 

MoDOT has focused for some time on system-wide safety solutions. We have worked with our Design Division 

to address our Engineering Policy, our Operations and Maintenance staff to improve the roadsides, and our 

Planning staff to better evaluate and select safety needs for improvements. We have also worked with the 

previously mentioned internal partners on the training and use of the Highway Safety Manual (HSM). 

Additionally, we work daily with the Highway Safety office to evaluate and monitor the crash types. It is vital 

that all areas in our department work together and focus on safety improvements. We have also worked with 

FHWA's resource center to provide training to our staff on a variety of areas associated with safety, such as 

HSM training, RSA training, and STEP training.

MoDOT has also begun reporting on the safety benefits of all projects utilizing HSIP funds as part of an internal 

assessment of our HSIP program. This assessment is used as part of a vetting process for safety projects 

planned to be incorporated into the State Transportation Improvement Program.

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning. 

• Academia/University
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 7 of 56

• FHWA

• Governors Highway Safety Office

• Law Enforcement Agency

• Local Government Agency 

• Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs)

• Other-National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

• Other-Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

• Other-Emergency Services, Department of Revenue, etc

Describe coordination with external partners. 

Missouri's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is the umbrella document that identifies emphasis areas and 

prioritizes strategies for reducing fatalities and serious injuries on all Missouri roadways. The development of 

the SHSP utilized significant involvement from external stakeholders throughout the state, including 

metropolitan planning organizations and local government agencies.

MoDOT has also identified the top counties where non-state system fatalities have occurred and worked with 

them to develop localized strategic safety plans. These plans identify systemic countermeasures and spot 

treatment projects. We also work with our LTAP center to continue to move safety forward in our state. 

Beginning this fiscal year, MoDOT will be piloting a Safety Circuit Rider program through the LTAP center. This 

would provide an safety expert to work with local agencies that may not have the staff required to develop a 

local road safety plan or identify safety countermeasures for issues in there areas.

Additionally, when setting the new safety performance targets, MoDOT had an inclusive process which 

thoroughly involved collaboration with our MPOs and other planning partners to come to a consensus on the 

2020 targets.

Describe HSIP program administration practices that have changed since the last 

reporting period. 

MoDOT has also begun reporting on the safety benefits of all projects utilizing HSIP funds as part of an internal 

assessment of our HSIP program. This assessment is used as part of a vetting process for safety projects 

planned to be incorporated into the State Transportation Improvement Program.

Describe other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to 

elaborate. 

Safety initiatives continue to be driven by the State SHSP. The State SHSP includes numerous safety 

initiatives that are data driven. Each district develops a regional district safety plan for their available HSIP 

funds. These district plans must support the overarching goals of the statewide SHSP at the district level.

Program Methodology

Does the State have an HSIP manual or similar that clearly describes HSIP planning, 

implementation and evaluation processes?

No

MoDOT has an EPG article that outlines the safety program guidelines.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 8 of 56

http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=907.1_Safety_Program_Guidelines

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP. 

• Horizontal Curve

• Intersection

• Median Barrier

• Roadway Departure

• Skid Hazard

• Wrong Way Driving

While no HSIP funds have been spent on local roadways, MoDOT's District staff shares this program 

information with our local agency partners to help prioritize projects and assist with the development of their 

localized safety plans.

Program: Horizontal Curve

Date of Program Methodology:2/8/2013

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Volume Horizontal curvature 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-Systemic evaluation
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 9 of 56

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Other-Systemic safety initiative:2

Other-Severity Index:1

Risk factors focused on this crash type have been developed to identify locations would benefit from a 

systemic safety treatment.

We communicate the locations of interest to planning entities like our Metropolitan Planning Organizations and 

Regional Planning Commissions.

Program: Intersection

Date of Program Methodology:1/21/2009

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Volume Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 10 of 56

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-Systemic evaluation

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Other-Systemic safety initiative:2

Other-Severity Index:1

We communicate the locations of interest to planning entities like our Metropolitan Planning Organizations and 

Regional Planning Commissions.

Program: Median Barrier

Date of Program Methodology:9/27/2002

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Volume 

Median width 

Horizontal curvature 

Functional classification 

Roadside features 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 11 of 56

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-Systemic evaluation

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Other-Systemic safety initiative:1

Risk factors focused on this crash type have been developed to identify locations would benefit from a 

systemic safety treatment.

Program: Roadway Departure

Date of Program Methodology:10/1/2004

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Volume Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 12 of 56

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-Systemic evaluation

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Other-Systemic safety initiative:2

Other-Severity Index:1

Risk factors focused on this crash type have been developed to identify locations would benefit from a 

systemic safety treatment.

We communicate the locations of interest to planning entities like our Metropolitan Planning Organizations and 

Regional Planning Commissions.

Program: Skid Hazard

Date of Program Methodology:2/8/2013

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only 

Other-Wet pavement crashes 

Horizontal curvature 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

• Other-Wet/Dry Crash Ratio

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

Yes
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 13 of 56

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-Systemic evaluation

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Other-Systemic safety initiative:0

Other-Wet/Dry Crash Ratio:1

We communicate the locations of interest to planning entities like our Metropolitan Planning Organizations and 

Regional Planning Commissions.

Program: Wrong Way Driving

Date of Program Methodology:6/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Volume Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 14 of 56

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Competitive application process

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Other-Systemic Safety Initiative:1

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements? 

 60

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic improvements? 

• Cable Median Barriers

• High friction surface treatment

• Horizontal curve signs

• Install/Improve Lighting

• Install/Improve Pavement Marking and/or Delineation

• Install/Improve Signing

• Pavement/Shoulder Widening

• Rumble Strips

• Upgrade Guard Rails

• Wrong way driving treatments

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

• Crash data analysis

• Data-driven safety analysis tools (HSM, CMF Clearinghouse, SafetyAnalyst, usRAP)

• Engineering Study

• Road Safety Assessment

• SHSP/Local road safety plan

• Stakeholder input

• Other-Enforcement and other stakeholders input.

• Other-Peer Exchange - lessons learned

All of the countermeasure identification processes listed here are applicable to MoDOT's countermeasure 

selection, although they vary depending on how the safety need was identified (Systemic, Spot, RSA).

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

Yes
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 15 of 56

Describe how the State HSIP considers connected vehicles and ITS technologies. 

Emphasis Area 1 of Missouri's Strategic Highway Safety Plan targets Serious Crash Types. In this emphasis 

area, six focus areas were identified.

Lane Departure

• Run-Off-Road - Not in a Curve 

• Run-Off-Road - In a Curve 

• Collision with Tree and/or Utility Pole 

• Head-On 

Intersections

• Non-signalized 

• Signalized 

Each of these focus areas have key strategies identified, including supporting vehicle-to-infrastructure 

communications. MoDOT is exploring the use of 3rd party partnerships to provide motorist in vehicle 

information related to traffic signals. This information could be provided to the motorist through the dashboard 

of their vehicle or through a mobile application.

MoDOT is also actively pursuing the use of autonomous Truck Mounted Attenuators (TMAs) for mobile work 

zones. Two autonomous TMAs are currently being tested in a pilot project. 

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts? 

Yes

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts. 

The HSM is encouraged to be used when performing alternative analysis of safety countermeasures for 

particular projects. This often involves using crash modification factors from the CMF clearing house.

The HSM is also used to develop anticipated safety benefits for a project, which is used to both justify using 

safety funds and prioritizing the project.

More recently, MoDOT developed a systemic evaluation tools for commonly used safety countermeasures. 

These tools provide information regarding the anticipated value that the systemic improvement may have, 

based on identified risk factors.

Describe program methodology practices that have changed since the last reporting 

period. 

MoDOT has developed systemic evaluation tools for commonly used safety countermeasures. These tools 

provide information regarding the anticipated value that the systemic improvement may have, based on 

identified risk factors.

MoDOT has begun reporting the quantifiable safety benefits of all projects utilizing HSIP funds as part of an 
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 16 of 56

internal assessment of our HSIP program. This assessment is used as part of a vetting process for safety 

projects planned to be incorporated into the State Transportation Improvement Program.

Describe other aspects of the HSIP methodology on which the State would like to 

elaborate. 

MoDOT uses data driven safety analysis to identify the top crash types occurring in Missouri and developed a 

list of strategies focused on addressing these crash types. Additionally, MoDOT develops lists of various 

locations of interest that identify where there may be safety concerns based on various criteria, such as:

- High Severity Locations (Intersections/Range)

- Run Off Road Crash Locations (Curves and No Shoulders)

- Wet Crash Locations

- Crossed Centerline Crash Locations

Details regarding MoDOT's Safety Program can be found in MoDOT's Engineering Policy Guide 907.1.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 17 of 56

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for HSIP funding. 

State Fiscal Year

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category.

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % 

OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $47,849,000 $81,076,293 169.44%

HRRR Special Rule (23 

U.S.C. 148(g)(1))

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

154)

$12,071,000 $14,785,543 122.49%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

164)

$0 $0 0%

RHCP (for HSIP 

purposes) (23 U.S.C. 

130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds 

(i.e. STBG, NHPP)

$0 $0 0%

State and Local Funds $5,098,000 $9,008,477 176.71%

Totals $65,018,000 $104,870,313 161.29%

One of the reasons for the difference between the total programmed funds and obligated funds is due to 

MoDOT's retroreflectivity striping and guardrail upgrades programs. Estimates for these programs were not 

included in the programmed numbers above. However, they are included in the obligated number above, which 

were 22M for striping and 18M for guardrail upgrades.

Another item of note are the programmed and obligated 154 penalty (open container) funds. Given the fact that 

the federal fiscal year ends in September and the state fiscal year ends in June, there are some safety projects 

programmed with open container funds that will be obligated in the following state fiscal year.

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal 

safety projects?

0%

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects? 

0%

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

1%
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 18 of 56

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

1%

The only non-infrastructure safety projects using HSIP funds are for work zone enforcement.

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas 

during the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126? 

0%

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during 

the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126? 

0%

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in 

the future. 

Asset management is a relatively new practice being implemented by MoDOT. By performing asset 

management MoDOT will ensure they are able to maintain the existing transportation network. Implementing 

new safety improvements that will add to the transportation system can be a challenge to fund in Districts that 

are unable to meet their asset management goals. It has been proposed to include HSIP projects into 

MoDOT's asset management process to ensure the safety improvements constructed will be able to be 

maintained into the future.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 19 of 56

General Listing of Projects

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period. 

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

Add signs for 

wrong way 

movements at 

various ramp 

locations. 

Andrew, 

Atchison, 

Buchanan, and 

Holt Counties.

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other

29 Ramps $307800 $342000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Principal ArterialInterstate15,200 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing, add 

rumblestripes, 

and upgrade 

guardrail from 

Rte. 752, in St. 

Joseph, to Platte 

County line. 

$500,000 Open 

Container funds.

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - paved or 

other

13 Miles $680000 $2703000 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Minor Arterial 1,322 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing and 

add 

rumblestripes 

from Marceline 

to Rte. 24 in 

Keytesville. 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

20 Miles $1188900 $3138000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 691 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing and 

add 

rumblestripes 

from Rte. T, in 

Forest City, to 

Rte. 59 in 

Oregon. 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

2.5 Miles $78300 $449000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,151 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing and 

add 

rumblestripes 

from Iowa State 

line to Rte. 71 

near Maryville. 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

14 Miles $540000 $2172000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,466 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing and 

add 

rumblestripes 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

15 Miles $1306200 $2690000 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Rural Principal ArterialOther2,488 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 20 of 56

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

from the 

Chariton River 

near Novinger to 

the east city 

limits of Green 

Castle and add 

rumblestripes 

from th

Add roundabout 

at intersection of 

Rte. BB and Rte. 

19 south junction 

(Scott’s Corner), 

south of 

Laddonia. 

$939,000 Open 

Container funds.

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Intersection

s

$1761600 $1853000 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,778 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Add intersection 

turn lanes at Rte. 

KK near Troy. 

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - modify left-turn 

lane offset

1 Intersection

s

$448200 $556000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

21,088 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Signage upgrade 

for wrong way 

countermeasure

s at various ramp 

locations. 

$135,000 

Statewide Safety 

funds.

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other

11 Ramps $121500 $135000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Principal ArterialInterstate24,056 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing and 

add 

rumblestripes 

from 0.9 mile 

south of Rte. 54 

east junction in 

Louisiana to 

Lincoln County 

line. 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

21 Miles $469800 $3073000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,115 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Interchange 

improvements at 

I-435 within the 

limits of Kansas 

City. $2,558,000 

Open Container 

funds. Project 

involves bridges 

A0990, A0991, 

A0992 and 

Interchange 

design

Interchange design - other 1 Interchange

s

$5798000 $4123300

0

HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate63,383 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 21 of 56

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

Adding Wrong 

Way, Do Not 

Enter and One 

Way Signing at 

various ramp 

locations. 

Roadway signs 

and traffic

control

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other

31 Interchange

s

$413100 $459000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Principal ArterialInterstate64,531 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Add intersection 

turn lanes at Rte. 

AA, Rte. Z/W 

and County 

Road 1801. 

$458,000 Open 

Container funds.

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

4 Intersection

s

$3497300 $3835000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

9,948 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Adding Wrong 

Way, Do Not 

Enter and One 

Way Signing at 

various ramp 

locations. 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other

10 Interchange

s

$239400 $266000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Principal ArterialInterstate14,725 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Remove islands 

and restripe Rte. 

45 at Klamm 

Road and Rte. 

45 at Riss Lake 

Drive. 

Intersection 

geometry

Splitter island - remove from 

one or more approaches

2 Intersection

s

$63900 $71000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther8,756 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

striping at 

various 

intersections

throughout the 

urban Kansas 

City District. 

$350,000 District 

Operations 

Budget.

Intersection 

traffic control

Pavement markings - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

127 Intersection

s

$360000 $750000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther5,934 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Sign and truss 

replacement at 

various locations 

in the urban 

Kansas City 

District. 

$200,000 District 

Operating funds.

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

527 Signs $3600 $1224000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 39,847 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Older 

Drivers

Vulnerable 

Roadway 

Users

Pavement 

resurfacing, add 

shoulders and 

rumblestripes 

from 0.2 mile 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

15 Miles $1421100 $3968000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 900 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 22 of 56

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

east of Rte. C at 

Fulton to Rte. D. 

Safety 

improvements 

for wrong way 

countermeasure

s at various ramp 

locations. 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other

43 Ramps $388800 $432000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Principal ArterialInterstate2,000 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing and 

add shoulders 

from Rte. 19 to 

Rte. 32 in Iron 

County, Rte. 19 

near Gasconade 

County Line to 

Rte. 49 and Rte. 

ZZ from 0.1 mile

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

20 Miles $1810800 $4736000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,200 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Widen 

intersection and 

add turn lane at 

the Rte. 133 

intersection near 

Westphalia. 

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Intersection

s

$27000 $846000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther10,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Add turn lanes 

and acceleration 

lanes at Flucom 

Road south of 

Olympian 

Village. 

$867,000 Open 

Container funds.

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Intersection

s

$1816500 $1922000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

25,737 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Add intersection 

southbound turn 

lanes at Amvets 

Drive in Desoto 

and Hilltop 

Mobile Home 

Court in 

Hillsboro. 

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

2 Intersection

s

$759600 $1231000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther18,090 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Add chevrons to 

curves at various 

locations 

throughout 

Jefferson 

County. 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

18 Curves $254700 $283000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 2,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 23 of 56

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

Pavement 

resurfacing, 

adding 

shoulders, 

bridge 

replacement, 

and superelevated curve 

correction from I70 South Outer 

road in Foristell 

to Rte. TT nea

Shoulder 

treatments

Shoulder treatments - other 13 Miles $7894900 $8456000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,942 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Adding signing 

and striping for 

wrong way 

countermeasures at 

various ramp 

locations 

throughout the 

St. Louis District 

along I-70, I-55 

and I-170. 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other

68 Ramps $826200 $918000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate108,09

8

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Replace signals, 

upgrade signal 

detection and 

upgrade 

pedestrian 

facilities to 

comply with ADA 

Transition Plan 

on Natural 

Bridge Avenue at 

various loc

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - 

modernization/replacement

14 Intersection

s

$1692000 $3683000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther16,211 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Add reflective 

back-plates to 

signals on 

various routes in 

Franklin and 

Jefferson 

Counties. 

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - add 

backplates with retroreflective 

borders

122 Signal 

heads

$136800 $152000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther37,867 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing, 

guardrail 

upgrades, and 

upgrading 

pedestrian 

facilities to 

comply with ADA 

Transition Plan 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian signal - install new 

at intersection

6 Intersection

s

$164000 $1668000 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Minor Arterial 21,746 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 24 of 56

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

from Norwood 

Trailer Drive to 

3rd Str

Add J-Turns 

between 

Independence 

Road and 

Wolfrum Road. 

$1,393,000 

Open Container.

Access 

management

Median crossover - directional 

crossover

1 Crossovers $1393000 $1393000 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Principal ArterialOther40,089 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing from 

Rte. 60 to Rte. 

39 and 

pavement 

resurfacing, add 

shoulders and 

rumblestripes on 

Rte. TT from Rte. 

39 to Rte. D in 

Stone Coun

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

6.9 Miles $203400 $1378000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,349 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing and 

upgrade 

guardrail from 

Rte. 65 to Rte. 

54 and on Rte. 

MM from Rte. 65 

to end of route. 

Project involves 

bridge A3689.

Roadside Barrier- metal 450 Feet $453600 $3018000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,057 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing from 

0.4 mile north of 

Finley Creek to 

Reeds Spring 

Junction and on 

Rte. 13 from 

Reeds Spring 

Junction to Table 

Rock Lake. Add 

tu

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - extend existing 

left-turn lane

7 Intersection

s

$117900 $5595000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther6,987 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing from 

south of South 

Street in Nixa to 

0.4 mile north of 

Finley Creek, 

and add turn 

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

8 Intersection

s

$128700 $1000000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther5,600 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 25 of 56

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

lane at Rosedale 

Road. 

Add intersection 

turn lanes and 

upgrade signals 

on Massey 

Boulevard at 

Tracker Road 

and Northview 

Road in Nixa. 

$237,600 Nixa,

$950,400 Nixa 

STBG-Urba

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - modify left-turn 

lane offset

2 Intersection

s

$159300 $1790000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

10,638 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Add lanes, 

sidewalk and 

pedestrian 

signals, and 

upgrade 

sidewalk to 

comply with the 

ADA Transition 

Plan on South 

Street from Rte. 

65 to Rte. 14 (3rd 

S

Roadway Roadway widening - add 

lane(s) along segment

2.4 Miles $450000 $3538000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 17,410 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing and 

guardrail 

improvements 

from beginning 

of state 

maintenance to 

Farm Road 60 

and on Rte. F 

from Rte. 160 to 

Rte. 266. Project 

i

Roadside Barrier- metal 600 Feet $10800 $1061000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 532 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Add lanes for 

four-lane 

expressway from 

0.3 mile west of 

County Road 94 

to 0.4 mile west 

of I-44, and 

construct J-turn 

at Westgate 

Avenue. 

Access 

management

Median crossover - directional 

crossover

1 Intersection

s

$175500 $8752000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 14,540 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 26 of 56

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

Pavement 

resurfacing and 

upgrade 

guardrail from 

north of 

Plainview Road 

to north of Rte. 

14 in Nixa. 

Modify turn lane 

configuration at 

Aldersgate Driv

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - modify left-turn 

lane offset

2 Intersection

s

$1045800 $3951000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

12,748 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Add roundabout 

at County Road 

103 and Repmo 

Drive in 

Republic. 

$169,330 

Republic, 

$78,870 

Republic R-3 

School District, 

and $992,800 

Republic STBGUrb

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Intersection

s

$616500 $1926000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 5,788 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Add J-turn at 

County Road 

157, add turn 

lanes at County 

Road 192 and 

add a 

southbound turn 

lane from 

Plainview Road 

to County Road 

157. 

Access 

management

Median crossover - directional 

crossover

1 Intersection

s

$1692900 $1881000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

17,650 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing, add 

shoulders and 

rumblestripes 

from 0.2 mile 

east of Rte. 65 to 

Rte. 125. 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

4.4 Miles $209700 $704000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 3,245 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing, and 

pedestrian 

crossing safety 

improvements 

from Farm Road 

60 to Rte. 160. 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Crosswalk 3 Crosswalks $14400 $236000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 2,106 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Pedestrians Vulnerable 

Roadway 

Users
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 27 of 56

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

Pavement 

resurfacing and 

guardrail 

improvements 

on disconnected 

sections of 

Eastgate Ave. 

from Division St. 

(Rte. YY) to 

Sunshine St. 

(Rte. D) and on 

Roadside Barrier- metal 3350 Feet $107100 $504000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 6,347 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Pavement 

resurfacing, add 

shoulders to Rte. 

OO and pullouts 

to Rte. C and 

add 

rumblestripes on 

Rte. OO from 

Rte. B to Rte. 38, 

on Rte. C from 

Rte. 38 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

8.3 Miles $162000 $2133000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 3,264 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Safety signage 

improvements in 

the rural 

Southwest 

District. 

$806,000 Open 

Container funds.

Roadway 

delineation

Roadway delineation - other 140 Curves $806000 $806000 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Principal ArterialOther1,500 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

High friction 

surface 

treatments 3 

miles west of 

Rte. B near 

Northview and 

on the 

westbound lanes 

2 miles west of 

Rte. 38 in 

Marshfield. 

$809,000 Open

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

2 Locations $809000 $809000 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate17,685 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Modify 

interchange 

configuration 

from Old 

Orchard Road to 

0.2 mile south of 

Veteran's 

Memorial Drive. 

$310,500 city of 

Interchange 

design

Interchange design - other 1 Interchange

s

$3692700 $6749000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

4,202 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Serious 

Crash Types
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 28 of 56

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

Cape Girardeau 

funds and 

$256,2

Pavement 

resurfacing and 

add 

rumblestripes 

from Rte. BB to 

Rte. 51. 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

16 Miles $1855800 $2622000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,942 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

Retroreflectivity 

of roadway 

markings.

Roadway 

delineation

Improve retroreflectivity 63000 Miles $2008620

0

$2231800

0

HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 50,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

On-call work 

zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the Northwest 

District. 

Noninfrastructure Enforcement 1 Initiative $9000 $10000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther50,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Work Zones Special 

Roadway 

Environment

s

On-call work 

zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the Northeast 

District. 

Noninfrastructure Enforcement 1 Initiative $9000 $10000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther50,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Work Zones Special 

Roadway 

Environment

s

On-call work 

zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the rural 

Kansas City 

District. 

Noninfrastructure Enforcement 1 Initiative $9900 $11000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther50,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Work Zones Special 

Roadway 

Environment

s

On-call work 

zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the urban 

Kansas City 

District. 

Noninfrastructure Enforcement 1 Initiative $145800 $162000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate50,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Work Zones Special 

Roadway 

Environment

s

On-call work 

zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the St. Louis 

District. 

Noninfrastructure Enforcement 1 Initiative $675000 $750000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther50,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Work Zones Special 

Roadway 

Environment

s

On-call work 

zone 

enforcement at 

Noninfrastructure Enforcement 1 Initiative $59400 $66000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate50,000 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Work Zones Special 

Roadway 
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 29 of 56

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

various locations 

in the rural 

Southwest 

District. 

Environment

s

On-call work 

zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the urban 

Southwest 

District. 

Noninfrastructure Enforcement 1 Initiative $159300 $177000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate50,000 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Work Zones Special 

Roadway 

Environment

s

Pavement 

resurfacing and 

add rumblestrips 

from Riverview 

Drive to Rte. 60. 

$1,662,000 

Open Container 

funds.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

12.4 Miles $1662000 $3223000 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,258 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Serious 

Crash Types

On-call work 

zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in Southeast 

District. 

Noninfrastructure Enforcement 1 Initiative $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther50,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Work Zones Special 

Roadway 

Environment

s

HSIP funds are reported at 90% (90/10) and OC funds are reported at 100% (100/0) of safety funded portions of projects.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 56

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five 

years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Fatalities 821 786 826 757 766 870 947 932 921

Serious Injuries 6,096 5,643 5,506 4,939 4,659 4,574 4,743 4,887 4,708

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

1.162 1.143 1.208 1.092 1.080 1.210 1.271 1.228 1.211

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

8.631 8.203 8.049 7.124 6.568 6.362 6.365 6.440 6.190

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

66 77 94 81 76 117 113 113 105

Number of nonmotorized serious 

injuries

365 402 329 367 332 319 356 358 343
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 31 of 56

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Annual Fatalities

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Annual Serious Injuries

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 32 of 56

0.95

1

1.05

1.1

1.15

1.2

1.25

1.3

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 33 of 56

In previous reports, low power electric bicycles were not included in the non-motorized fatalities and serious 

injuries. These motorized bikes that do not meet motorcycle status (such as mopeds) are now included in the 

non-motorized totals starting in the 2016 data. Data for this report was compiled in August 2019.

Describe fatality data source. 

State Motor Vehicle Crash Database

The fatality information for 2018 was not published in FARS at the time of this report.

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and 

ownership. 

Year 2018

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

 (5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

 (5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Interstate

43.8 158.2 0.63 2.29

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

52 204.2 1.16 4.58

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other

66.2 235.2 1.89 6.7

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Fatalities Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 34 of 56

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

 (5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

 (5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Rural Minor Arterial 91 380 2.59 10.81

Rural Minor Collector 20 92.4 3 13.8

Rural Major Collector 146.6 641.2 2.93 12.84

Rural Local Road or 

Street

77.4 398.8 1 5.14

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

85 403.2 0.6 2.85

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

47.6 241.2 0.9 4.54

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other

86.4 638.4 1.51 11.18

Urban Minor Arterial 88.6 648.6 1.4 10.3

Urban Minor Collector 2.6 19 4.61 29.72

Urban Major Collector 36.6 276.4 1.21 9.11

Urban Local Road or 

Street

43.4 373.2 0.59 5.12
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 35 of 56

Year 2018

Roadways Number of Fatalities

 (5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

 (5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

State Highway 

Agency

County Highway 

Agency

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City or Municipal 

Highway Agency

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority

Local Toll Authority

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, 

University)

Indian Tribe Nation

State System 651.6 3,081 1.29 6.11

City & County 235.6 1,632.4 1 6.96

Sample size may be an issue with some of the rates due to limited VMT data, such as Urban Minor Collectors. 

Data for this report was compiled in August 2019.

Provide additional discussion related to general highway safety trends. 

The total annual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for Missouri has climbed steadily since 2012. Missouri's VMT is 

now the highest it's been over the last decade. This increased amount of traffic increases the opportunity that a 

crash could occur. Despite this increase in VMT, Missouri's fatalities and serious injuries were down in 2018.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 36 of 56

One of the areas that has shown significant improvement is the performance of rural major collectors. This 

functional class has shown a steady decline in crashes over the last few years.

There have been over 100 non-motorized fatalities over the last 4 years. MoDOT has partnered with FHWA to 

organize Safe Transportation for Every Pedestrian (STEP) workshops to promote pedestrian safety initiatives.

MoDOT received additional funds from FHWA through an Accelerating Safety Activities Program (ASAP). 

These funds are to assist the development of the Missouri Systemic Countermeasures to Improve Pedestrian 

Safety (MoSCIPS) project. This effort would use data-driven safety analysis to develop guidance to prioritize 

and select pedestrian countermeasures specific to Missouri’s conditions.

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets 

Calendar Year 2020 Targets *

Number of Fatalities:859.3

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The target is based on our 2016 Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). In this plan, the goal is to 

have fewer than 700 fatalities by 2020. The 2019 target was based on the historical 5-year rolling 

average of fatalities, the 2020 goal in the SHSP, and extrapolating a 5-year rolling average target for 

2019. This target is in line with the SHSP to reduce the number of fatalities on Missouri's roadways.

Number of Serious Injuries:4505.4

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The target is based on our initial goal to have fewer than 4000 serious injuries by 2020. The 2020 

target was based on the historical 5-year rolling average of serious injuries, the initial 2020 goal 

assessed at the time of the first target setting effort, and extrapolating a 5-year rolling average target 

for 2020. This target is in line with the SHSP to reduce the number of serious injuries on Missouri's 

roadways.

Fatality Rate:1.130

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The fatality rate was calculated by taking a 5-year rolling average of historical and forecasted annual 

fatality rates. Historical fatality rates were derived from observed fatality totals and estimated Annual 

Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Forecasted rates were determined by using the number of fatalities 

target (developed from the SHSP target) and dividing by the estimated Annual VMT. It was assumed 

that Annual VMT would grow at a rate of 1% per year. This target is in line with the SHSP to reduce 

the number of fatalities on Missouri's roadways.

Serious Injury Rate:5.953
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 37 of 56

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The serious injury rate was calculated by taking a 5-year rolling average of historical and forecasted

annual serious injury rates. Historical serious injury rates were derived from observed serious injury 

totals and estimated Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Forecasted rates were determined by 

using the number of serious injuries target and dividing by the estimated Annual VMT. It was 

assumed that Annual VMT would grow at a rate of 1% per year. This target is in line with the SHSP to 

reduce the number of serious injuries on Missouri's roadways.

Total Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries:437.4

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The target is based on our initial goal to have fewer than 400 non-motorized fatalities and serious 

injuries by 2020. The 2020 target was based on the historical 5-year rolling average of non-motorized 

fatalities and serious injuries, the initial 2020 goal assessed at the time of the first target setting effort, 

and extrapolating a 5-year rolling average target for 2020. This target is in line with the SHSP to 

reduce the number of serious injuries on Missouri's roadways.

Targets based on 13% fatality reduction, 8% serious injury reduction, 1% VMT increase and 5 % nonmotorized reduction

Performance Measures for Fatalities, Fatality Rate, and Serious Injuries were set based on crash data 

available in April 2019 for use in the Highway Safety Plan.

Performance Measures for Serious Injury Rate and Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries were set 

based on crash data available in August 2019 for use in the Highway Safety Improvement Program Annual 

Report.

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish 

safety performance targets. 

For over 15 years, Missouri's Highway Safety Office has been located within MoDOT which promotes a 

collaborative environment between engineering and safety staff. MoDOT updated its Strategic Highway Safety 

Plan (SHSP) using a collaborative, team approach from August 2015 to October 2016. The team included 

external partners from emergency management, FHWA, FMCSA, hospitals, law enforcement, Missouri 

Department of Revenue, MPOs, NHTSA, Regional Planning Commissions (RPCs), and universities. The 2016 

SHSP team identified a goal of fewer than 700 fatalities by 2020. Revisions to the SHSP were shared 

periodically with the MPOs and RPCs.

Extensive coordination occurred between FHWA, MoDOT, MPO, and NHTSA staff when setting the Safety 

Targets. Missouri safety data was reviewed for trends, along with assumptions and challenges. MoDOT 

conducts monthly calls with planning stakeholders. In 2016, a target coordinating process was presented with 

feedback and consensus from the MPOs. In March, MoDOT calculated statewide and MPO data trends for 

each safety performance measure. This information was shared and discussed with MoDOT"s Executive 

Team, MPOs FHWA, and NHTSA. After review of feedback from partner groups, the methods and 

assumptions used to develop the performance targets were finalized in April. MoDOT then applied the agreed 

upon methodology to develop the safety performance targets and communicated them with the partners.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 38 of 56

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

Describe progress toward meeting the State’s 2018 Safety Performance Targets (based 

on data available at the time of reporting). For each target, include a discussion of any 

reasons for differences in the actual outcomes and targets. 

Based on the data available at the time of reporting, the actual 2018 performance was worse than the 2018 

targets, for each of the safety performance targets. This is primarily due to an increase in fatalities and serious 

injuries which occurred within the 5 year average reporting period. This is consistent with what was 

experienced nationally during this timeframe, meaning there were external factors, beyond the HSIP program, 

that were influencing the increase in fatalities. Fatalities reached a low point in 2013 with 757 fatalities and 

climbed to 947 in 2016. A similar increasing trend occurred for serious injuries which climbed from 4573 in 

2015 to 4887 in 2017. This increasing trend in fatalities and serious injuries has since been halted and Missouri 

is now seeing a decreasing number of fatalities and serious injuries. This decreasing trend could be attributed 

to the systemic initiatives and high benefit spot treatments being deployed as part of Missouri's HSIP program 

as well as other efforts attempting to change the safety culture of Missouri's motorists.

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

No 

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries 65 

years of age and older for the past seven years. 

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Fatalities

103 110 120 137 154 135 143

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Serious 

Injuries

378 352 355 361 367 369 424

Data for this report was compiled in August 2019.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 39 of 56

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP? 

• Benefit/Cost Ratio

• Change in fatalities and serious injuries

• Lives saved

• Other-Evaluation of individual HSIP projects and programs

MoDOT has begun reporting on the safety benefits, such as benefit/cost ratio and lives saved, of all projects 

utilizing HSIP funds as part of an internal assessment of our HSIP program. This assessment is used as part of 

a vetting process for safety projects planned to be incorporated into the State Transportation Improvement 

Program.

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of 

the State's program level evaluations. 

MoDOT will evaluate specific HSIP projects to assess their effectiveness at reducing fatal and serious injury 

crashes. This information is then used to promote or discourage the use of a particular safety countermeasure

For systemic improvements, MoDOT tracks the change in the number of fatalities as the amount of a safety 

improvement is further deployed. This allows MoDOT to monitor the safety benefits returned on its continued 

investment of a systemic strategy. One systemic strategy evaluated was the implementation of chevrons on 

curves where advisory speeds are at lead 15 mph less than posted speeds. Between 2014 and 2018, 

horizontal curve fatalities and serious injuries on minor roads decreased from 622 to 513. This is based on 

crash data pulled in August 2019.

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and 

success of the Highway Safety Improvement Program? 

• HSIP Obligations

MoDOT's planning office tracks the programming of safety funds to ensure they do not lapse on HSIP funds.

There are other success indicators that MoDOT has seen some improvement but they are not currently being 

reported on. These indicators include:

• # of RSAs completed 

• Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process 

• Increased focus on local road safety 

• More systemic programs 
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 40 of 56

Describe significant program changes that have occurred since the last reporting 

period. 

MoDOT has begun reporting on the safety benefits, such as benefit/cost ratio and lives saved, of all projects 

utilizing HSIP funds as part of an internal assessment of our HSIP program. This assessment is used as part of 

a vetting process for safety projects planned to be incorporated into the State Transportation Improvement 

Program.

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures. 

Year 2018

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Lane Departure 691.6 3,076.8 0.94 4.17

Roadway Departure 381.8 1,836.6 0.52 2.49

Intersections 296.6 2,187 0.4 2.96

Pedestrians 93.4 258.4 0.13 0.35

Bicyclists 11.4 83.2 0.02 0.11

Older Drivers 192.6 757.2 0.26 1.03

Motorcyclists 104.8 570.8 0.14 0.77

Work Zones 10.8 54.4 0.01 0.08

Data 0 0 0 0
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 41 of 56

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 42 of 56

Data for this report was compiled in August 2019.

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 43 of 56

Has the State completed any countermeasure effectiveness evaluations during the 

reporting period? 

No

We've begun evaluating the systemic application of doubling up intersection signage, but the data is too limited 

to draw conclusions.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 44 of 56

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

US 36 from 0.8 

miles east of 

Rte. AC to 0.7 

miles east of 

Rte. 31 in 

Dekalb 

County.

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Shoulder 

treatments

Pave existing 

shoulders

13.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 7.00 21.00 17.00 14.885

RT A from Rte. 

169 to Rte. 371 

near St. 

Joseph.

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

4.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 6.00 6.00 -0.355

MO 752 at the 

intersection 

with Gordon 

Street in St. 

Joseph.

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Other

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian 

beacons

1.00 1.00 -9.525

MO 16 from 

Rte. 6 to Rte. B 

in Canton (two 

disconnected 

sections).

Rural Major 

Collector

Shoulder 

treatments

Pave existing 

shoulders

13.00 8.00 1.00 2.00 7.00 3.00 21.00 13.00 0.191

US 63 at Rte. 

M at Atlanta.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Access 

management

Change in 

access - close or 

restrict existing 

access

2.00 2.00 4.00 38.139

US 63 at Rte. 

B and Rte. P at 

Clark.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Access 

management

Change in 

access - close or 

restrict existing 

access

1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 13.729

US 63 at Rte. 

K and Rte. Z at 

Cairo.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - 

modify right-turn 

lane offset

4.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 7.137

MO 47 from 

1.4 miles south 

of Rte. CC to 

0.7 mile north 

of Rte. N near 

Warrenton.

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Alignment Horizontal curve 

realignment

6.00 6.00 12.00 0.315
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 45 of 56

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

IS 49 at Rte. 

58 in Belton.

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

Interchange 

design

Interchange 

design - other

6.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 13.00 2.00 1.585

MO 2 from 

Commercial 

Street in the 

city of 

Harrisonville to 

Rte. ZZ.

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Shoulder 

treatments

Shoulder 

treatments - 

other

34.00 22.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 18.00 18.00 56.00 43.00 19.751

MO 7 from 

Colbern Road 

to Rte. 50 and 

from Cass 

County Line to 

the city of 

Harrisonville.

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Other

Roadway Roadway - other 12.00 23.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 4.00 8.00 10.00 26.00 38.00 0.202

MO 150 from 

Rte. 291 in 

Greenwood to 

Rte. E.

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Other

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

6.00 12.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 13.00 16.00 3.037

US 50 at the 

intersection of 

Rte. 58 in 

Centerview.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Roadway Roadway 

narrowing (road 

diet, roadway 

reconfiguration)

9.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 14.00 2.00 1.828

MO 10 from 

Rte. 13 to the 

east leg of Old 

Rte. 10.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other

Roadway Pavement 

surface - 

miscellaneous

0

MO 10 from 

Merrifield Lane 

to Rte. FF.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other

Roadway Pavement 

surface - 

miscellaneous

0

RT D from Rte. 

58 to Rte. Y.

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

13.00 14.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 10.00 3.00 26.00 19.00 18.458

RT YY from 

Rte. Y to Rte. 

C.

Urban Major 

Collector

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

4.00 8.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 9.00 10.00 3.021

US 169 from 

Smithville city 

limits to Rte. 

W, on Rte. 69 

from Rte. 92 to 

Rte. D and on 

Rte. 45 from 

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

52.00 48.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 5.00 26.00 24.00 81.00 79.00 -5.764
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 46 of 56

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

Rte. JJ to Spur 

45.

MO 33 from 

Rte. PP to Rte. 

69 in Kearney.

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

50.00 59.00 1.00 2.00 5.00 26.00 19.00 82.00 80.00 -8.655

RT A from Rte. 

92 to end of 

state 

maintenance.

Urban Major 

Collector

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

10.00 2.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 15.00 8.00 -0.573

MO 13 from 

Bus. 13 to I-70.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

28.00 45.00 4.00 2.00 14.00 14.00 46.00 61.00 2.235

MO 52 from 

the Henry 

County Line to 

Rte. 65.

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

24.00 21.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.00 2.00 35.00 25.00 3.24

MO 152 from 

North 

Congress 

Avenue to 

Flintlock Road.

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Roadside Barrier - cable 82.00 120.00 2.00 4.00 31.00 45.00 119.00 165.00 7.897

MO 273 from 

Rte. 45 to Rte. 

92 Spur.

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

9.00 7.00 2.00 5.00 6.00 16.00 13.00 131.089

RT C from Rte. 

O to Rte. 240 

and Rte. 240 

from Rte. 41 to 

the Missouri 

River Bridge.

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Pavement 

surface - 

miscellaneous

5.00 5.00 0.103

US 54 at Key 

Largo Road 

and Osage 

Beach

Parkway.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Access 

management

Change in 

access - close or 

restrict existing 

access

2.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 6.00 7.00 12.00 0.209

US 54 on the 

eastbound and 

westbound 

lanes near 

Madison Street 

in Jefferson 

City.

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Roadway Pavement 

surface - high 

friction surface

58.00 9.00 3.00 22.00 1.00 83.00 10.00 53.941
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 47 of 56

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

RT M from 

Route B in 

Wardsville to 

Route 50 near 

Taos.

Urban Major 

Collector

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Curve-related 

warning signs 

and flashers

3.00 2.00 1.00 4.00 2.00 13.575

MO 32 from 

east of Salem 

to Rte. 72.

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

41.00 30.00 1.00 10.00 3.00 10.00 15.00 62.00 48.00 15.644

IS 270 on I-270 

from east of I170 to west of 

I-170 and west 

of Lilac to east 

of 

Bellefontaine 

Road and Rte. 

67 from Cinder 

Road to south 

of the Misso

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

Shoulder 

treatments

Pave existing 

shoulders

6.00 6.00 1.00 4.00 6.00 11.00 -118.73

IS 170 from I270 to Page 

Avenue.

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

Roadside Barrier- metal 323.00 370.00 1.00 2.00 7.00 5.00 99.00 112.00 430.00 489.00 -11.029

RT D at 

Skinker 

Parkway, 

Hodiamont 

Avenue and 

Union Blvd.

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Other

Intersection 

traffic control

Systemic 

improvements - 

signal-controlled

18.00 33.00 1.00 11.00 18.00 29.00 52.00 -2.706

MO 7 from Rte. 

65 to Camden 

County.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

7.00 7.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 10.00 11.00 -18.668

US 160 from 

County Road 9 

to Rte. 123 

near Willard.

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

3.00 7.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 9.00 10.00 28.754

MO 125 from 

Rte. 60 to 

Smyrna Road.

Urban Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 1.854

MO 76 from 

Route 173 to 

Rocky Top 

Way in Reeds 

Spring.

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

9.00 11.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 11.00 5.00 23.00 18.00 26.74
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 48 of 56

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

MO 165 at 

Table Rock 

Lake Dam.

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadside Barrier- metal 0

MO 265 from 

Table Rock 

Dam to Rte. 65 

and on Rte. 

165 from Rte. 

76 to Rte. 265 

in Branson.

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

4.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 12.00 6.00 18.607

MO 7 on Rte.7 

from Rte. PP in 

Tightwad to 

Rte. 65 in 

Warsaw, Rte. 

83 from Rte. 

65 to Rte. MM, 

and Rte. U 

from Mora 

Road to Rte. 

52.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

29.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 9.00 5.00 41.00 13.00 2.081

MO 14 from 

Rte. M 

(Nicholas 

Road) in Nixa 

to Rte. W in 

Ozark.

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

61.00 52.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 35.00 23.00 102.00 78.00 121.885

MO 64 from 

Rte. 65 to Rte. 

64A.

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

6.00 7.00 6.00 10.00 12.00 17.00 -0.738

MO 32 from 

east of Rte. 65 

to Rte. P.

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

15.00 17.00 4.00 1.00 8.00 14.00 23.00 36.00 -117.513

MO 360 on the 

James River 

Freeway 

westbound 

ramp to I-44.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Roadway Pavement 

surface - high 

friction surface

1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 110.513

MO 125 from 

Ozarks 

Transportation 

Organization 

boundary to I44 in Strafford.

Urban Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 6.00 5.00 -3.292

MO 125 from 

east of Rte. 65 

in Fair Grove 

Urban Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

5.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 9.00 16.00 -3.599
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 49 of 56

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

to the Ozarks 

Transportation 

Organization 

boundary.

US 160 from 

Rte. 65 to Rte. 

76 east of 

Forsyth.

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

80.00 157.00 3.00 1.00 15.00 9.00 40.00 16.00 138.00 183.00 52.693

MO 176 from 

Rte. 65 to Rte. 

160.

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - 

edge or shoulder

2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 3.00 1.281

MO 34 from 

Rte. 51 in 

Marble Hill to 

Rte. 72/34 

intersection.

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Other

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

53.00 51.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 3.00 21.00 19.00 83.00 75.00 -3.017

RT C from Rte. 

25 to Rte. 51.

Rural Major 

Collector

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

10.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 5.00 2.00 17.00 6.00 1.377

US 67 from 

Madison 

County line to 

4.1 miles south 

of Butler 

County line.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Roadway Roadway 

widening - add 

lane(s) along 

segment

113.00 97.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 5.00 28.00 26.00 147.00 130.00 201.746

RT W from 

Rte. 177 to 

LaSalle 

Avenue near 

Cape 

Girardeau.

Urban Major 

Collector

Roadway Pavement 

surface - 

miscellaneous

11.00 18.00 1.00 3.00 5.00 7.00 19.00 26.00 -39.487

MO 177 from 

Rte. 61 to Rte. 

J.

Urban Major 

Collector

Roadway Pavement 

surface - 

miscellaneous

19.00 29.00 4.00 7.00 7.00 26.00 40.00 -6.547

MO 106 from 

Rte. H to Rte. 

21.

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

4.00 7.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 7.00 10.00 -4.88

US 67 at the 

intersection of 

Rtes. 67, 221, 

and W in 

Farmington.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Interchange 

design

Interchange 

design - other

35.00 11.00 1.00 2.00 37.00 12.00 -2.09

MO 47 from 

Rte. 21 to Rte. 

67.

Rural Major 

Collector

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

110.00 105.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 8.00 27.00 43.00 143.00 157.00 11.142
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 50 of 56

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

RT Y on Rte. Y 

in St. Francois 

and Ste. 

Genevieve 

counties.

Rural Major 

Collector

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

54.00 47.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 17.00 8.00 78.00 62.00 0.63

RT O from Rte. 

61 to Rte. 32.

Rural Major 

Collector

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

20.00 15.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 7.00 4.00 30.00 20.00 20.616

MO 114 from 

Rte. 25 to Rte. 

60 and on city 

streets in 

Dexter.

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

17.00 18.00 2.00 13.00 10.00 32.00 28.00 1.45

MO 34 0.6 mile 

west of Rte. ZZ 

at Glen Allen to 

1 mile east of 

Rte. ZZ. 

Project 

involves bridge 

F0747R.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - 

paved or other

7.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 12.00 2.00 1.682

US 61 from 

Sikeston to 

New Madrid.

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Pavement 

surface - 

miscellaneous

67.00 85.00 1.00 2.00 10.00 10.00 40.00 25.00 118.00 122.00 -182.928

MO 51 from 

McBride to 

Perryville.

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Pavement 

surface - 

miscellaneous

22.00 18.00 1.00 1.00 8.00 10.00 31.00 29.00 -0.747

Various 

bridges 

statewide.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Roadside Barrier- metal 49.00 65.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 7.00 22.00 36.00 76.00 109.00 0.695

Various 

intersections 

statewide.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other

Roadway 

delineation

Roadway 

delineation - 

other

0

Various 

workzones 

statewide.

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other

Noninfrastructure Enforcement 0

The projects included above were completed during calendar year 2014, and have 3 years of before and after crash data. Combined, these projects reduced 10 fatal crashes, 34 serious injury crashes, and 65 minor injury crashes.

Some of the projects implemented during this timeframe were systemic improvements. These improvements may have been deployed at locations with characteristics associated where crashes could occur without necessarily having an 

immediate history of severe crashes.
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 51 of 56

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative? 

 10/17/2016

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP? 

From: 2016 To: 2020

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update?

 2020

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

ROAD TYPE MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY SEGMENT Segment Identifier 

(12)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Route Number (8) 100 100

Route/Street Name 

(9)

100 100

Federal Aid/Route 

Type (21)

100 100

Rural/Urban 

Designation (20)

100 100 100 100

Surface Type (23) 100 80 100 30

Begin Point 

Segment Descriptor 

(10)

100 100 100 100 100 100

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Segment Length 

(13)

100 100

Direction of 

Inventory (18)

100 100

Functional Class 

(19)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Median Type (54) 30 30

Access Control (22) 100 20

One/Two Way 

Operations (91)

100 20
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 52 of 56

ROAD TYPE MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Number of Through 

Lanes (31)

100 80 100 20

Average Annual 

Daily Traffic (79)

100 80 100

AADT Year (80) 100 80

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100 100 100 100 100

INTERSECTION Unique Junction 

Identifier (120)

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Road 1 Crossing 

Point (122)

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Road 2 Crossing 

Point (123)

100 100

Intersection/Junction 

Geometry (126)

100 100

Intersection/Junction 

Traffic Control (131)

100 80

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road 

(79)

100 80

AADT Year (80) 100 80

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139)

100 100

INTERCHANGE/RAMP Unique Interchange 

Identifier (178)

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (197)

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201)

100 100

Ramp Length (187) 100 100
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 53 of 56

ROAD TYPE MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195)

100 100

Roadway Type at 

End Ramp Terminal 

(199)

100 100

Interchange Type 

(182)

100 100

Ramp AADT (191) 100 100

Year of Ramp AADT 

(192)

100 100

Functional Class 

(19)

100 100

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100

Totals (Average Percent Complete): 96.11 82.78 100.00 92.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 72.22 100.00 100.00

*Based on Functional Classification

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026. 

MoDOT will use several methods over the next several years to meet the requirements for the collection of FDE’s on all public roads. MoDOT will prioritize these needs by addressing the Non-Local Paved roads data gaps first. 

Surface Type/Number of Lanes/one-two way operations/access control/Median Type – These data items will be addressed through the cooperative program we have with our local authorities that ensures we have complete and correct 

geospatial network. As we continue these reviews in the future, we will ask them to provide these additional four items. Also, much of this data can be collected through other sources such as aerial photography and video logging. The 

targeted completion data for the collection and storage of this data is December 31, 2023.

The second priority will be the Local Paved Roads. 

Surface Type/Number of through lanes – These items will be collected at the same time they are collected on Non-Local Paved roads. Since geospatial reviews include all public roads, this data will have already been collected.

AADT – it is estimated that an additional 80,000 traffic count locations will be needed to fulfill this requirement. Based on historical cost and practices, this will equate to an additional cost of $3 million annually. After a complete inventory 

of the other FDE’s is available, a better estimate will be able to be established. The funding required to collect these additional volume counts will come at the expense of an equal value of safety improvements on the system. In addition, 

MoDOT has worked with several local agencies to “share” traffic data, but there has been little success. Few agencies collect traffic data in a manner that allows the calculation of AADT. Local government collect traffic data, often one 

time only, for specific purposes like signal timing. Local agencies do not have permanent sites or a history of short term counts available to create AADT’s. Assuming that MoDOT would receive an additional $3 million annually and 

choose to spend it on our traffic collection program, the AADT data for Local paved Roads could be completed by September 30, 2026.

Did the State conduct an HSIP program assessment during the reporting period? 

No

The last HSIP assessment took place in 2016 and highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of Missouri's HSIP process. Some of the program strengths identified include:
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 54 of 56

• The ability to align its safety projects with other transportation improvements to save on costs and extend HSIP benefits. 

• The flexibility for each district to program HSIP funds to projects that best suit the needs of their region. 

• The systemic approach to safety improvements, which has been widely regarded as a best practice nationally.

The following are some of the focus areas to continue improving the HSIP program:

• Strong relationships and partnerships between State and local agencies are key to successful HSIP local road safety policies. 

• Local agencies and officials often need technical support or techinical guianace to overcome technical expertise barriers. 

• Data driven and systemic safety improvement practices lend authority to project selection decisions and make it easier to work with stakeholders. 

• Regional or county/parish safety plans can be a useful tool for guiding project selection and spending. 

• Application and implementation procedures need to be documented but flexible enough to handle unique circumstances and needs. 

When does the State plan to complete its next HSIP program assessment.

2020
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 55 of 56

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

Project Implementation:

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

Compliance Assessment:
2019 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 56 of 56

Glossary

5 year rolling average: means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data 

(e.g. annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area: means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process.

Highway safety improvement project: means strategies, activities and projects on a public road 

that are consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous 

road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem.

HMVMT: means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects: are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule: applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which 

data are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013.

Performance measure: means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to 

monitor changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and 

objectives.

Programmed funds: mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification: means the process by which streets and highways are 

grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP): means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on 

safety data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148.

Systematic: refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across 

a system.

Systemic safety improvement: means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high 

risk roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types.

Transfer: means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.