alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25507]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Federal Salary Council; Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: According to the provisions of section 10 of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given that 
the fifty-second meeting of the Federal Salary Council will be held at 
the time and place shown below. At the meeting, the Council will 
continue discussing issues relating to locality-based comparability 
payments authorized by the Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act of 
1990 (FEPCA). The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: October 14, 1997, at 10:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW., Room 7310 
(formerly 7B09), Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth O'Donnell, Chief, Salary Systems 
Division, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW., Room 7H31, 
Washington, DC 20415-0001. Telephone number: (202) 606-2838.

    For the President's Pay Agent.
Janice R. Lachance,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 97-25507 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                                  ------------

                      LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

National N-Viro Tech., Inc. (Ohio)
Midwest N-Viro, Inc. (Illinois)
Tennessee-Carolina N-Viro, Inc. (Tennessee)
N-Viro Soil South, Inc. (Florida)
N-Viro Honolulu, Inc. (Hawaii)
Pan-American N-Viro, Inc. (Delaware)
BioCheck Laboratories, Inc.* (Ohio)
American N-Viro Resources, Inc. (Ohio)

*Assets were sold April 1, 1996 but the entity was never dissolved.
# Full Table

# Sheet3
#### CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, a municipal corporation, Petitioner, v. Albert WOOD, Respondent.

No. 41239.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 9, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 13, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Tax, Wienke

From: Harvey Eder <harveyederpspc©yahoo.com>

Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 9:43 PM

To: Tax, Wienke; harveyederpspc@yahoo.com

Subject: Fw: Happy 4th!

Attachments: B251627_CTlof3.pdf

Torti, DianaThis is in response to your letter requesting an emailed

copy of the Clerk’s Transcript in Eder v. South Coast Air Quality

Mgmt. Dist., et al. (B251627). The Clerk’s Transcript is 3 volumes

with a

ToMe

Jun16

This is in response to your letter requesting an emailed copy of the Clerk’s Transcript inEder v. South

Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., et a!. (B251 627).

The Clerk’s Transcript is 3 volumes with a total of 510 pages. Due to limitations, the documents were

too large to send in one email. There will be two emails to follow this one.

Diana Torti,Executive Secretary to the Clerk/Executive Officer

COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

300 South Spring Street, Second Floor North Tower, Los Angeles. CA 90013

General: 21 3-830-7000 -Direct: 213-830-7111

diana.torti@jud.ca.gov courts.ca.gov/2dca facebook.com/2dcoa

Sign in to Yahoo

jy what matters most in your world.

L breaking local, national and global news.

iflUsic., movies and more.

h Yhoc,

On Thursday, July 3, 2014 2:31 PM, “Tax, Wienke” <Tax.Wienkeepa.gov> wrote:

Hi Harvey —

I have not received anything from you since 21 June, the 5 emails all arrived 20/21 June but only 1 part (part 3)

of the Court documents. You do have the correct email address, or you did for the 5 emails that you sent. I am

checking on the status of including links.

1
FREE WORKSHOP

What are Road Diets?

Undivided roadways often experience a large number of 

crashes—especially between high-speed through traffic, 

left-turning vehicles, and other road users. One treatment for 

addressing this safety concern is a Road Diet, which typically 

involves removing or narrowing motor vehicle lanes and utilizing 

the space for other uses, including but not limited to a two-way 

left-turn lane (TWLTL), non-motorized travel modes, or parking. 

Road Diet Workshop

FHWA is pleased to offer a one-day workshop on this low-cost, 

proven safety countermeasure that explores how agencies can 

use Road Diets to improve safety, operations, and livability in 

their communities.

Participants will be introduced to the FHWA Road Diet 

Informational Guide and guided through a decision-making 

process to determine when a Road Diet may be a good solution.

Who Should Attend

 Transportation engineers and planners

 Pedestrian & bicycle and Safe Routes to School

 program coordinators

 Local police, fire, EMS and transit personnel

 Community leaders

Workshop Learning Outcomes

 Learn about the different types of Road Diets and why

they work.

 Understand the characteristics that make Road Diets the

right choice.

 Identify roads that are good candidates for Road Diets.

 Learn what segment and intersection design elements are affected by a Road Diet.

 Practice reallocating street space for other uses, including non-motorized user needs.

Workshop Agenda

Part 1: 

» Why consider a Road Diet?

» When to use a Road Diet?

» How to design a Road Diet?

Part 2: 

» Evaluate a real-world Road

Diet candidate project.

» Document findings and

make recommendations.

Workshop Time and Location

You Choose!

Contact hours: 6 - 8

For more information or

to schedule a workshop 

please contact:

Rebecca Crowe

FHWA Off ce of Safety

804-775-3381

rebecca.crowe@dot.go

v

FHWA-FA-16-033
Why Choose a Road Diet?

Safety.

Road Diets can make the roadway 

environment safer for all users. Studies 

indicate a 19 to 47 percent reduction 

in overall crashes when a Road Diet is 

installed. 

Cost-efficiency.

Road Diets make efficient use of 

a limited cross sectional area. 

When planned in conjunction with 

reconstruction or overlay projects, 

the safety and operational benefits 

of Road Diets can be achieved 

essentially for the cost of restriping 

the pavement.

 Quality of Life.

Road Diets can make shared spaces 

more livable and contribute to a 

community-focused, “Complete 

Streets” environment. 

Example of a Road Diet

Before After

Before After

Example of a Road Diet on Southern Blvd., Bronx, New York

Source: NYCDOT

www.fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 24, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10812

Summary Calendar

 

CARDELL RHETT, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT; ET AL.,

Defendants,

T. REVELL; NFN GONZALEZ,

Defendants-Appellants.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:96-CV-114

--------------------

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Dr. William Gonzalez and Dr. Tim Revell appeal from the

district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment in

Cardell Rhett, Jr.’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The district court

determined that Rhett had produced sufficient evidence to create a

genuine issue of material fact regarding deliberate indifference to
2

his serious medical needs. We lack jurisdiction to review the

district court’s determination. Nerren v. Livingston Police Dep’t,

86 F.3d 469, 472 (5th Cir. 1999).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### FEDERAL LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Samuel WERNICK; Alphee S. Arsenault; W. M. Murphy, Jr., as Guardian ad Litem for Fay Arsenault, Deceased, (formerly known as Fay C. Rawford) wife of Alphee S. Arsenault; Richard H. Schaffer, and Carolyn F. Schaffer, his wife; The United States of America; The First Marion Bank; and Snodgrass Hardware, Inc., Appellees.

No. 69-558.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 16, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County ; Murray W. Overstreet, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have file with 
the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Esprit International Shipping Combined Transport, Inc., 7940 E. Garvey 
Avenue, Suite 203, Rosemead, CA 91770, Officers: Amy Choi, President, 
Tracy Cheuk-See Chan, Vice President
Bestway Shipping, Inc., 269 E. Redondo Beach Blvd., Gardena, CA 90248, 
Officer: Harry Hyungsuk Choi, President
III Star Freight Services, Inc., 140 Eastern Avenue, Chelsea, MA 02150, 
Officers: Mikhail Kravetskil, President, Joseph A. Scali, Treasurer
Asian Pacific Logistics, 23202 Audrey Avenue, Torrance, CA 90505, Paul 
Yoon, Sole Proprietor
Unlimited Logistics, 2395 Giltner Road, Smithfield, KY 40068, Martha A. 
Works
Pacific Shipping Company, 1011 Klickitat Way, Suite 203, Seattle, WA 
98134, Officers: Kim Knise, President, James G. Rosselot, Vice 
President
Maromar International Freight Forwarders Inc., 8262 N.W. 14th Street, 
Miami, FL 33126, Officers: Maricel Barth, President, Marta Barth, 
Operations Director
Guardian Moving and Storage Co., Inc. d/b/a Guardian International 
Forwarders, 1901 Light Street, Baltimore, MD 21202, Officers: Eugene W. 
Smoot, President, Mario S. Smoot, Vice President
Global Marine Services, Inc., 2085 Talleyrand Avenue, Building ``A'', 
P.O. Box 2239, Jacksonville, FL 32206, Officers: Carlton H. Spence, 
Director, Jeffrey C. Spence, Director/President.

    Dated: October 10, 1997.
Ronald D. Murphy,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27534 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 2010 - Present MI Traffic Crash Report Manual 2010,

MI Traffic Crash Report Manual 2014

A - Incapacitating Injury A

Any injury, other than fatal, that prevents the injured person from walking, driving, or 

normally continuing the activities which he or she was capable of performing prior to the 

motor vehicle traffic crash. Includes: Severe lacerations, broken or distorted limbs, skull 

fracture, crushed chest, internal injuries, unconscious when taken from the crash scene, 

unable to leave crash scene without assistance. 

Excludes: Momentary unconsciousness.

General: Determinations are made at the time the injured person leaves the crash scene. It is 

not necessary to consult with doctors or hospitals unless information is not otherwise 

available. Apparent condition immediately after the crash does not govern classification 

because the person may recover from hysteria quickly or may begin to feel the effects of 

internal or other injuries between the time of the crash and the time of leaving the scene. (a.) 

Medical treatment at the crash scene or later makes no difference. What the person does at 

the scene is important. (b.) Hospitalization normally will be required for incapacitating 

injuries. (c.) Duration of the disability after injury makes no difference. Incapacitation is 

important. (d.) Developments after leaving the scene make no difference except in case of 

death.

Injury/Injury Severity Classification definitions found of pg3-8,3-9 (PDF 

pg50-51 [2010], pg49-50 [2014])

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE STATE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 2006 - Present

MI UD-10 Traffic Crash Report Manual 2014

MI Traffic Crash Report Manual 2010,

MI Traffic Crash Report 2006

P (Pedestrian) Check Box* Person on foot, skis, skates or rollerblades, rider of a horse, horse and buggy (each occupant, 

including driver will be listed as a separate pedestrian unit), non-motorized wheelchair Unit Type

definition found on Manual pg3-3 

(PDF pg44), definition found on 

Manual PDF pg9-5 (PDF pg99 ).

Pedalcyclist 2006 - Present

B (Bicycle) Check Box*

All forms of pedalcycles, including those with one, two and three wheels (multiple persons on 

a bicycle must be listed as a separate bicycle (B) unit, tag alongs and affixed bicycle cart 

occupants are considered separate bicycle units).

Unit Type

definition found on Manual pg3-3 

(PDF pg44), definition found on 

Manual PDF pg9-5 (PDF pg99 ).

* Police Accident Report includes a check box for Pedestrian/Bicycle - please refer to the State's Data Dictionary for corresponding database value

Michigan
#### John Edward BILLEDEAUX v. O. J. ADAMS and Charter Oaks Insurance Company.

No. 62136.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: John Edward Billedeaux, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Calcasieu. 355 So.2d 1345.

Granted. Case remanded to Court of Appeal to consider award of special damages to plaintiff, in view of the fact that the intervention was not before the Court of Appeal, without prejudice to any right of the intervention’s claim to be recognized.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A


     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
           For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996


Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an exhibit
          the Annual Servicing Report of Company's Independent
          Public Accountants. 


                  Commission File Nos. 0-23942


         HOUSEHOLD AFFINITY CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST I 
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
(Servicer of the Trust)
(Exact name as specified in Servicer's charter)


            DELAWARE                      36-3670374             
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation of Servicer)        Number of Registrant


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070     
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Servicer)


Servicer's telephone number, including area code  (847) 564-5000 









<PAGE>










                           SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Servicer has duly caused this
amendment to be signed on behalf of the Household Affinity Credit
Card Master Trust I by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




                          HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Servicer of and on behalf of the

                     HOUSEHOLD AFFINITY CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST I
                                    (Registrant)




Date:  May 9, 1997       By:/s/John W. Blenke              
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary
















U:\WP\HFS088\95-10K\AFFINITY


<PAGE>



                                 




                           Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.    Exhibit                                      Page No.

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants          4
               Annual Servicing Report dated March 26, 1997.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30,
1999,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              750
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                       (750)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
PUBLIC LAW 104–101—FEB. 1, 1996 110 STAT. 49

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2061 (S. 1097):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–412 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 141 (1995): Nov. 2, S. 1097 considered and passed Senate.

Dec. 18, H.R. 2061 considered and passed House.

Vol. 142 (1996): Jan. 5, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–101

104th Congress

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker City,

Oregon, as the ‘‘David J. Wheeler Federal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker

City, Oregon, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘David J.

Wheeler Federal Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘David

J. Wheeler Federal Building’’.

Approved February 1, 1996.

Feb. 1, 1996

[H.R. 2061]
#### FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, etc., Petitioner, v. The ATLANTIC NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSONVILLE, etc., Respondent.

No. 39734.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 25, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 234 So.2d 736.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Technest  Holdings,  Inc.  and
Subsidiaries  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Mark Allen, Director of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/Mark Allen
Mark Allen
Director (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
May 22, 2003
#### Jiri BEREZOVSKY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 10, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, and John Coleman, Legal Intern, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Margarita Esquiroz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on May 18,1976 (335 So.2d 592) affirming the judgment and sentence of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed September 15, 1977, 350 So.2d 80 and mandate now lodged in this court, affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded the cause for resentencing.

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on August 10, 1976 is withdrawn the judgment of this court filed in this cause on May 18, 1976, except as is affirmed by the judgment of the Supreme Court dated September 15, 1977, is vacated and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court. The judgment and sentence appealed from herein is reversed in part and affirmed in part and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with the views expressed herein. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16b Florida Appellate Rules).
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 10, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00897

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM THOMAS BO OTH,

Appellant

From the Probate Co urt No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PC

- 2786

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This appeal was abated for mediation on April 14, 2015 . On J une 10, 2015 , the mediator

filed a report stating that the mediation was not successful. It is therefore ORDERED that this

appeal is REINSTATED on the docket of this court. Appellant’s brief must be filed in this court

no later than thirty days from the date of thi s order.

_________________________________ Jas on Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court