Page 1 of 71

WASHINGTON
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 2 of 71

Table of Contents

Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................... 2

Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................................... 3

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 4

Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 5

Program Structure ................................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Administration...................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 8

Project Implementation ......................................................................................................................................... 17

Funds Programmed ........................................................................................................................................... 17

General Listing of Projects ............................................................................................................................... 20

Safety Performance ............................................................................................................................................... 42

General Highway Safety Trends ....................................................................................................................... 42

Safety Performance Targets .............................................................................................................................. 56

Applicability of Special Rules .......................................................................................................................... 57

Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................................. 59

Program Effectiveness ...................................................................................................................................... 59

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements ...................................................................... 60

Project Effectiveness ......................................................................................................................................... 65

Compliance Assessment ....................................................................................................................................... 66
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 3 of 71

Disclaimer 

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence 

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or 

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section [HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for 

damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or other data.” 

23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data 

compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of 

potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 

130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement 

project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for 

damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or data.” 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 4 of 71

Executive Summary 

The Washington state HSIP program funds both local safety (70%) and state 

highway safety (30%) programs. The program continues to be successful with 

a slight drop in fatality crash (-14), increase in serious injury (109), nonmotorized fatalities (+6) and non-motorized serious injuries (+94). Projects 

going forward using HSIP funds target the top two (both priority one) 

infrastructure focus areas identified in the SHSP (Run-Off-the-Road and 

Intersections). The Department has made significant strides in implementation 

and use of the HSM and uses data driven decision making throughout planning 

and project development. MIRE compliance is on track to meet federal rules.

The HSIP program has had a major benefit and effect on road safety in 

Washington state. While state highways have allocated state funds to support 

safety efforts, in addition to HSIP funds, the majority of local road safety 

efforts are funded by the HSIP program. With 70% of fatal and serious injury 

crashes in the priority one focus areas, the HSIP provides a primary means for 

the state to have any possibility to achieving its Target Zero vision by 2030.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 5 of 71

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of achieving 

a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 

924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP implementation and 

evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the HSIP Reporting Guidance dated December 

29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, progress in implementing highway safety 

improvement projects, progress in achieving safety outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the 

improvements and compliance assessment.

Program Structure

Program Administration

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

Washington uses a centralized approach for determining HSIP projects within the state. This includes the 

development and analysis of priorities using WSDOT strategic highway safety plan as the basis for establishing 

emphasis area.

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Other-multiple organizations

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The following Divisions all participate in WSDOT safety activities:

Design

Planning, 

Traffic Operations,

Safety,

Local Programs

Governors Highway Safety Office 

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

Other-Funds are allocated centrally
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 6 of 71

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

WSDOT allocates funds through both reactive and proactive approaches. The data driven categories are derived 

from emphasis areas contained within Target Zero and are used to target specific crash types and contributing 

factors to crashes. 

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP.

Washington uses a data-driven process to determine HSIP funding levels for state vs local roads. The current 

SHSP, "Washington Strategic Highway Safety Plan: Target Zero," (www.targetzero.com) has specified priority 

levels for types/causes/categories of fatal & serious injury crashes based on crash type, driver behaviors, or user 

type. The top 2 infrastructure related priorities are Run-Off-the-Road crashes (priority 1) and Intersection 

crashes (priority 1).

To determine the HSIP funding allocation between state and local roadways, WSDOT evaluates the number of 

fatal & serious injury run-off-road and intersection-related crashes statewide for a consecutive 5-year period. 

WSDOT calculates the ratio of crashes on local agency responsibility roads to those on state highways then 

allocates HSIP funding between state and local roadways based on that percentage. Currently, local agencies 

receive 70% of HSIP funds and the state receives 30%.

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) Bureaus, Divisions) 

are involved with HSIP planning.

Traffic Engineering/Safety

Design

Planning 

Maintenance

Operations 

Districts/Regions

Local Aid Programs Office/Division

Governors Highway Safety Office 

Other-Local Programs

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Describe coordination with internal partners.

Oversight for the 70% of the HSIP funds that are directed to local agencies is assigned to the Local

Programs division for management (to identify local agency priorities, distribution of funds to counties & 

cities, individual projectselection, federal oversight, project delivery, etc.).

Responsibility for the 30% of the HSIP funds that are directed to the state is managed by the WSDOT

Multimodal Safety Executive Committee (MSEC). WSDOT does not have a specific highway safety office 

solely responsible for the HSIP within the DOT, but is a matrixed team. Implementation of highway safety

is done collaboratively across all of the department's divisions and coordinated between all modes. The
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 7 of 71

highway safety program through the MSEC provides department-wide and multimodal coordination and

input on highway and modal safety issues. Oversight is the responsibility for Quality Assurance & 

Transportation System Safety Division who see that the MSEC policy and procedures are carried out throughout 

each of the respective divisions. Roles and responsibilities of each office are defined by a matrix with agreement 

by the Directors. MSEC is comprised of program directorsfrom all of the major highways divisions (Design,

Planning, Program Management, Traffic Operations, Local Programs, Quality Assurance & Transportation

System Safety, and Strategic Analysis & Reporting) and modes(Ferries, Rail, Aviation, Bicycle, 

Pedestrian and Transit.) The Highway Safety Issue Group provides technical support to the MSEC and is 

comprised of each Headquarter Division and Regional participants from each of WSDOT six regions.

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning.

Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs) 

Governors Highway Safety Office 

Local Technical Assistance Program

Local Government Agency 

FHWA

Other-WSDOT has organized a Safety Target Setting Organization to establish targets. A safety data business 

plan group is also in place to assist with WSDOT Safety Data needs identification

Other-MPOs are part of target setting activities

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Note that LTAP is actually an internal partner in Washington State, not an external partner, and is located in the 

Local Programs division. 

We also see FHWA as an internal partner in the process and have routine meetings to discuss and consider 

approaches to crash reduction and carrying out the program. 

Describe coordination with external partners.

WSDOT interacts and coordinates with multiple external partners as part of development of Target Zero and in 

setting targets. WSDOT routinely meets with MPOs and SHSO and its federal divisions in carrying out its 

safety program activities.

Have any program administration practices used to implement the HSIP changed since the last reporting 

period?

No

Are there any other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to elaborate?

Yes

Describe other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to elaborate. 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 8 of 71

WSDOT has developed an Safety Improvement Program implementation plan to clearly tie the SHSP emphasis 

area to WSDOT safety program. The plan identifies safety-sub categories to each SHSP emphasis area, and also 

identifies performance measures for each sub-category. The Department also reports performance monthly as 

part of performance reporting activities.

Program Methodology

Does the State have an HSIP manual or similar that clearly describes HSIP planning, implementation 

and evaluation processes?

No

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

No, there is no HSIP manual, but documents are developed and maintained by various divisions necessary to 

carry out the program.

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP.

Other-State - Collision Analysis Corridors 

Other-State - Collision Analysis Locations 

Other-State - Intersection Analysis Locations

Other-Local - City Safety Program

Other-Local - County Safety Program 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The state HSIP program focuses primarily on Collision Analysis Locations (CALs), which are generally 

focused on low-cost spot modifications at specific crash locations and Intersection Analysis Locations (IALs) 

related to Intersection safety.

The local HSIP program primarily focuses on a County Safety Program, with emphasis on Roadway Departure 

crashes and Intersection crashes, and a City Safety Program, with emphasis on Intersection crashes and 

Pedestrian crashes.

Program: Other-State - Collision Analysis 

Corridors 

Date of Program Methodology: 1/1/2012 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area 

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 9 of 71

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Traffic 

Volume 

Median width 

Horizontal curvature 

Functional classification 

Roadside features 

Other-Roadway data required for 

the HSM predictive method 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process 

Other-Project selection criteria approved by executive management; projects reviewed and approved by a 

technical panel

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C : 1 

Available funding : 2 

Other-Fatal & serious injury crash history : 3 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 10 of 71

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Other-State - Collision Analysis 

Locations 

Date of Program Methodology: 1/1/2012 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area 

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Traffic 

Volume 

Median width 

Horizontal curvature 

Functional classification 

Roadside features 

Other-Roadway data required for 

the HSM predictive method 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 11 of 71

selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C : 1 

Available funding : 3

Other-Fatal & serious injury crash history : 2 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Other-State - Intersection Analysis 

Locations 

Date of Program Methodology: 1/1/2012 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area 

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Volume 

Functional classification 

Other-Roadway data required for 

the HSM predictive method 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

No
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 12 of 71

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process 

Other-Project selection criteria approved by executive management; projects reviewed and approved by a 

technical panel

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C : 1 

Available funding : 3 

Other-Fatal & serious injury crash history : 2 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Other-Local - City Safety Program 

Date of Program Methodology: 1/1/2011 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area 

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 13 of 71

Crash frequency

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C : 1 

Available funding : 2 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Other-Local - County Safety Program 

Date of Program Methodology: 1/1/2014 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area 

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 14 of 71

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Lane miles 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Other-Allocation of funds to each county based on rate of fatal & serious injury crashes per mile 

Other-Completion of a local road safety plan

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Available funding : 2 

Other-Completion of Local Road Safety Plan : 1 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements?

 50 

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic improvements? Please check all that 

apply.

Cable Median Barriers

Rumble Strips

Install/Improve Signing

Install/Improve Pavement Marking and/or Delineation

Upgrade Guard Rails 

Clear Zone Improvements
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 15 of 71

Horizontal curve signs 

High friction surface treatment

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? [Check all that apply]

Engineering Study 

Road Safety Assessment

Crash data analysis

SHSP/Local road safety plan

Data-driven safety analysis tools (HSM, CMF Clearinghouse, SafetyAnalyst, usRAP) 

Other-Use of HSM, Statistical analysis

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Use of statistical analysis tools to perform 5th E approach (evaluation, analysis and diagnosis) 

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

Yes

Describe how the State HSIP considers connected vehicles and ITS technologies. 

ITS technology is an appropriate countermeasure for safety and could be a selected countermeasure to address 

fatal and serious crashes.

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts?

Yes

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts.

WSDOT uses the HSM throughout its HSIP efforts. 

Have any program methodology practices used to implement the HSIP changed since the last reporting 

period?

No

Are there any other aspects of the HSIP methodology on which the State would like to elaborate?

Yes

Describe other aspects of the HSIP methodology on which the State would like to elaborate.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 16 of 71

WSDOT continues to focus on data driven safety analysis throughout its program efforts. WSDOT is using 

performance based practical design and a sustainable safety approach. WSDOT has focused on data driven 

approaches through identifying the 5th E of safety as Evaluation, analysis and diagnosis. It is thought that this 

approach allows for the targeting of specific crash types and contributing factors, and also maximizes the return 

on safety benefit for selected countermeasures.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 17 of 71

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for HSIP funding.

Calendar Year

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category.

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $78,854,423 $44,795,549 56.81%

HRRR Special Rule (23 U.S.C. 

148(g)(1))

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 154) $0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 164) $1,302,568 $400,000 30.71%

RHCP (for HSIP purposes) (23 

U.S.C. 130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

$63,544,989 $36,233,872 57.02%

State and Local Funds $90,088,289 $90,088,289 100%

Section 402: State and 

Community Highway Safety

$7,512,047 $5,696,970 75.84%

FAST Act: Section 405 $10,386,649 $7,396,378 71.21%

Totals $251,688,965 $184,611,058 73.35%

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

HSIP, Other Federal Funds, and State and Local funds represent Calendar Year 2016. Programmed and 

obligated funds are both based on projects in the 2016 STIP. Note that most projects include some safety 

elements and countermeasures, in larger or smaller shares of other projects using federal funds. These projects 

are not captured here, in part because it would be very difficult to break out the safety funding versus non-safety 

funding within those projects. It should be noted that the state and local funds included in the table are what was 

"committed" to the projects as part of a match, but are not officially "obligated" as they are not federal funds. 

Local Agency Projects: Programmed values are from the 2016 STIP. Obligated values are from SPORT 

(internal database) for projects in the 2016 STIP. 

State Projects: Programmed values are from the 2016 STIP. Obligated values for HSIP funds are from FMIS 

(FMIS Business Objects with HSIP recodes) for projects in the 2016 STIP. This is calculated by taking the total 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 18 of 71

HSIP obligations and subtracting the local HSIP obligations. Obligated values for Other Federal-aid Funds are 

from FATS (internal database) for projects in the 2016 STIP. This is calculated by assuming the difference 

between programmed and obligated funds in FATS is the difference for state projects (as it was mostly state 

projects identified in the FATS database).

Behavioral Projects: Behavioral funds are administered by the Washington Traffic Safety Commission 

(WTSC). These figures represent federal fiscal year 2017, including carry forward funds for some categories. 

Programmed reflects funds that have been transferred from NHTSA to the WTSC. Obligated funds are not yet 

available (for funds that have been allocated to specific projects aside from Section 402 funds), so programmed 

funding levels are shown. 

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal safety projects?

$167,462,348 

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects?

$140,101,715 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Note that the local funding shown in answer to this question does not include any of the behavioral 

funds/programs shown in Question 23. Only the split for infrastructure-related projects is shown. Also note that 

for HSIP funds, the funding is split 70% programmed/obligated for local safety projects, 30% 

programmed/obligated for state safety projects.

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$17,898,696 

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$13,093,348 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Note that none of the HSIP funds are directed to non-infrastructure projects. These funds represent only the 

behavioral funds shown in Question 23. 

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas during the reporting 

period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$0 

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during the reporting 

period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$0 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 19 of 71

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in the future.

WSDOT provides much of its HSIP appropriation to its local partners. Providing matching funds may be 

challenging for some agencies.

Does the State want to elaborate on any other aspects of it’s progress in implementing HSIP projects?

Yes

Describe any other aspects of the State’s progress in implementing HSIP projects on which the State 

would like to elaborate. 

WSDOT believes that having the ability to use HSIP funds for non-infrastructure improvements is 

important to reestablish. It would also be helpful to continue to emphasize that expenditure for safety 

software and data is appropriate. Given the changes under MAP-21 and FAST additional wording would be 

beneficial in 23 USC 409 and 23 USC 148 that highlights that safety shared with Safety Partners (MPOs, 

Health, State Police, SHSO) is protected for the agency sharing and receiving the data when used for HSIP 

purposes (e.g., SHSP, Target Setting, Safety Planning, Public Awareness)
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 20 of 71

General Listing of Projects

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period.

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Adams County -

Safety Data 

Collection & 

Analysis

Non-infrastructure Data/traffic records $180000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data LDX 3.7 - Locate 

and inventory fixed 

objects inside the 

clear zone to 

support 

development of 

programs and 

projects to reduce 

the severity of runoff-road crashes.

Adams County -

Lee Rd #12421 

Safety 

Improvements

Roadside Roadside grading $313500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.2 - Design 

safer slopes and 

ditches to prevent 

rollovers.

City of Auburn -

Traffic Signal 

Safety 

Improvements

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

general retiming

$412575 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

City of Auburn -

Auburn Way 

South (SR 164) 

Corridor Safety 

Improvements

Access 

management

Change in access -

miscellaneous/unspecified

$2333108 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.11 -

Implement restricted 

access to 

properties/driveways 

adjacent to 

intersections using 

closures or turn 

restrictions.

City of Auburn - A 

Street SE and 

37th Street SE

Intersection traffic 

control

Intersection traffic control -

other

$792260 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections

City of Auburn - A 

Street SE 

Corridor Signal 

Improvements

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

general retiming

$458500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

City of Auburn -

22nd Street NE 

and I Street NE 

Roundabout

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

$1057500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Major 

Collector

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.1 - Install or 

convert intersections 

to roundabouts.

City of Bellingham 

- N. State St./E. 

Laurel St. 

Pedestrian Safety

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Modify existing crosswalk $350000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Pedestrians PED 4.1 - Improve 

safety at pedestrian 

crossings by 

investing in and 

installing refuge 

islands, and 

shortening crossing 

distances with curb 

extensions.

City of Bothell -

228th St. SE at 

Bothell Everett 

Hwy (SR 527)

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

$2330000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.3 -

Provide/improve leftand right-turn 

channelization.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 21 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

City of Bremerton 

- Bremerton 

Highway Safety 

Improvements, 

Phase 2

Lighting Lighting - other $1085100 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Pedestrians PED 4.4 - Improve 

sight distance and 

visibility at 

pedestrian crossings 

by clearing 

vegetation, 

extending crossing 

times, adding 

pedestrian leading 

intervals or adding 

pedestrian scale 

illumination.

City of Bremerton 

- West Belfair 

Valley and 

Tracyton Beach 

Roads

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

$1675490 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Major 

Collector

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Lane Departure LDX 2.3 - Increase 

road surface skid 

resistance using 

high friction surface 

treatments.

Chelan County -

Countywide 

Roadway Safety 

Plan

Non-infrastructure Transportation safety planning $180000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data

Chelan County -

Chumstick Hwy 

#93350 Safety

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$467500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

Clallam County -

Black Diamond 

Rd #31030

Roadside Roadside grading $268000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.2 - Design 

safer slopes and 

ditches to prevent 

rollovers.

Clark County -

Washougal River

Rd & Lockwood 

Creek Rd

Roadside Barrier- metal $1332945 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

Clark County -

Hazel Dell 

Avenue Adaptive 

Traffic Signals

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

signal coordination

$1004000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

Clark County -

Curve Safety 

Improvement

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

$331000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.3 - Increase 

road surface skid 

resistance using 

high friction surface 

treatments.

Clark County -

Hayes Rd N & S 

Safety 

Improvements

Roadside Barrier- metal $546165 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 22 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

cushions, and 

others.

Columbia County 

- Safety Data 

Collection & 

Analysis 

(Countywide 

Clear Zone 

Inventory)

Non-infrastructure Data/traffic records $27000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data LDX 3.7 - Locate 

and inventory fixed 

objects inside the 

clear zone to 

support 

development of 

programs and 

projects to reduce 

the severity of runoff-road crashes.

Columbia County 

- Safety Data 

Collection & 

Analysis 

(Countywide Sign 

Upgrade)

Non-infrastructure Data/traffic records $98000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data LDX 3.7 - Locate 

and inventory fixed 

objects inside the 

clear zone to 

support 

development of 

programs and 

projects to reduce 

the severity of runoff-road crashes.

Columbia County 

- Tucannon Road 

- Phase 3

Roadside Barrier- metal $168750 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

Columbia County 

- Lyons Ferry Rd 

#22290

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other $138490 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 3.4 - Improve 

visibility of 

intersections on 

approaches.

Cowlitz County -

Install/Upgrade 

Curve Warning 

Signs

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$109000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

Cowlitz County -

South Pekin Road 

Guardrail

Roadside Barrier- metal $118000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

Cowlitz County -

Willow Grove 

Road Guardrail

Roadside Barrier- metal $568000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 23 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

cushions, and 

others.

Douglas County -

Rock Island Rd - 

Safety 

Improvements

Roadside Barrier- metal $25825 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

Douglas County -

McNeil Canyon 

Rd - Runaway 

Truck Ramp

Roadside Roadside - other $563705 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

City of Edmonds -

SR 99 

Illumination - 

220th St SW to 

212th St SW

Lighting Continuous roadway lighting $684000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.4 - Install 

illumination at 

locations with 

nighttime crashes.

City of Edmonds -

228th St SW 

Corridor 

Improvements

Roadway Roadway - other $4234000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections

City of Everett -

Citywide Safety 

Improvements

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Modify existing crosswalk $450000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Major 

Collector

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Systemic Pedestrians PED 4.6 - Invest in 

and construct 

roadway 

reconfigurations, 

roundabouts, and 

other FHWA proven 

safety 

countermeasures 

specific to 

pedestrian safety.

City of Everett -

Pacific Avenue 

and Broadway 

Safety

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Modify existing crosswalk $780000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Pedestrians PED 4.6 - Invest in 

and construct 

roadway 

reconfigurations, 

roundabouts, and 

other FHWA proven 

safety 

countermeasures 

specific to 

pedestrian safety.

City of Everett -

Everett Citywide 

Intersection 

Signing

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

$965566 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Major 

Collector

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 1.13 - Improve 

visibility of 

intersections by 

providing enhanced 

signing and 

delineation.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 24 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

City of Everett -

Everett Mall Way 

Intersection 

Safety

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

general retiming

$498091 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

City of Everett -

Broadway - 10th 

St. to 19th St. 

Intersection 

Safety

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

general retiming

$531344 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

City of Federal 

Way - Citywide 

Flashing Yellow 

Arrow 

Conversions

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal - add 

flashing yellow arrow

$913600 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 1.8 - Employ 

flashing yellow 

arrows at signals.

Ferry County -

Curve Signing 

Upgrades

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$259618 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

Ferry County -

Safety Data 

Collection

Non-infrastructure Data/traffic records $31500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data LDX 3.7 - Locate 

and inventory fixed 

objects inside the 

clear zone to 

support 

development of 

programs and 

projects to reduce 

the severity of runoff-road crashes.

Ferry County -

Enhanced 

Pavement 

Surface 

Treatments

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

$363471 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.3 - Increase 

road surface skid 

resistance using 

high friction surface 

treatments.

City of Fircrest -

Traffic Signal 

Safety 

Improvements

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal - add 

flashing yellow arrow

$337560 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.8 - Employ 

flashing yellow 

arrows at signals.

Franklin County -

Data Collection - 

Guardrail & 

Signing

Non-infrastructure Data/traffic records $22500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data LDX 3.7 - Locate 

and inventory fixed 

objects inside the 

clear zone to 

support 

development of 

programs and 

projects to reduce 

the severity of runoff-road crashes.

Franklin County -

2015 and 2016 

County Safety 

Improvements

Roadside Roadside grading $795795 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.2 - Design 

safer slopes and 

ditches to prevent 

rollovers.

Garfield County -

2014 Highway 

Safety Project

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

$272500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 25 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

delineation, 

especially in curves.

Grant County -

2014 Signing 

Improvements

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$813410 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

Grant County -

Safety Data 

Collection - 

Guardrail

Non-infrastructure Data/traffic records $36540 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data LDX 3.7 - Locate 

and inventory fixed 

objects inside the 

clear zone to 

support 

development of 

programs and 

projects to reduce 

the severity of runoff-road crashes.

Grant County -

2014 County 

Safety 

Improvements - 

RPMs, Rumble 

Strips, LED 

Flashing Signs

Roadway Rumble strips - unspecified or 

other

$189030 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.4 - Install 

center and/or edge 

line rumble strips.

Grays Harbor 

County - 2014 

County Guardrail 

Project

Roadside Barrier- metal $1012763 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

Island County -

County Guardrail

Roadside Barrier- metal $758384 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

Island County -

County Signing 

Upgrades

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

$152242 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

City of Kenmore -

62nd Avenue NE 

Corridor Safety

Speed 

management

Traffic calming feature $813200 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Local Road 

or Street

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Speeding SPE 2.2 - Use 

traffic-calming and 

other design factors 

to influence driver 

speed.

City of Kennewick 

- Citywide Safety 

Improvements

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

general retiming

$350000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Major 

Collector

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 26 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

City of Kennewick 

- Clearwater Ave. 

- Leslie Rd. to US 

395

Access 

management

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

$2120000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.11 -

Implement restricted 

access to 

properties/driveways 

adjacent to 

intersections using 

closures or turn 

restrictions.

City of Kent -

Citywide Traffic 

Control Signal 

System Upgrade

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal - add 

flashing yellow arrow

$400000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 1.8 - Employ 

flashing yellow 

arrows at signals.

City of Kent - SR 

515 (108th Ave. 

SE) and SE 208th 

St. Intersection 

Safety

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

$700000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.3 -

Provide/improve leftand right-turn 

channelization.

King County -

2014 County 

Safety Selection

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

$3180500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.3 - Increase 

road surface skid 

resistance using 

high friction surface 

treatments.

King County -

Mini Roundabouts 

in Highline and 

Fairwood

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

$737826 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Local Road 

or Street

0 County Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.1 - Install or 

convert intersections 

to roundabouts.

City of Kirkland -

Citywide Safety 

and Traffic Flow 

Improvement

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

signal coordination

$300000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

City of Kirkland -

Lakefront 

Pedestrian and 

Bicycle 

Improvements

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian warning signs -

add/modify flashers

$989400 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Pedestrians PED 4.2 - Invest in 

and increase the 

use of rectangular 

rapid flashing 

beacons and 

pedestrian hybrid 

beacons where 

these crosswalk 

enhancements are 

needed.

City of Kirkland -

Juanita Drive 

Quick Wins

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Modify existing crosswalk $1287395 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Pedestrians PED 4.4 - Improve 

sight distance and 

visibility at 

pedestrian crossings 

by clearing 

vegetation, 

extending crossing 

times, adding 

pedestrian leading 

intervals or adding 

pedestrian scale 

illumination.

Kittitas County -

Kittitas County 

Road Safety 

Improvements -

Roadside Barrier- metal $594900 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 27 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Westside Rd and 

Huntzinger Road

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

Kittitas County -

Safety Plan 

Development

Non-infrastructure Transportation safety planning $54000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data

Klickitat County -

Safety Data 

Collection - 

Signing

Non-infrastructure Data/traffic records $135000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data LDX 3.7 - Locate 

and inventory fixed 

objects inside the 

clear zone to 

support 

development of 

programs and 

projects to reduce 

the severity of runoff-road crashes.

Klickitat County -

County Road 

Safety Plan

Non-infrastructure Transportation safety planning $112500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data

Klickitat County -

Bridge Rail & 

Guardrail 

Upgrades

Roadside Barrier- metal $163500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

Klickitat County -

County Signing 

Improvements

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$266000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

Klickitat County -

BZ Glenwood 

Highway High 

Friction Surface 

Treatment

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

$275000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.3 - Increase 

road surface skid 

resistance using 

high friction surface 

treatments.

City of Lakewood 

- 40th Ave. SW 

and 96th St. SW 

Safety

Roadside Barrier- metal $823350 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

City of Lakewood 

- Dekoven Drive 

Traffic Calming

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

$212000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Major 

Collector

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.1 - Install or 

convert intersections 

to roundabouts.

City of Lakewood 

- Military Rd. & 

112th St. Safety

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

general retiming

$788500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 28 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

City of Lakewood 

- Steilacoom 

Boulevard Safety 

Improvements

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

general retiming

$2405000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

Lewis County -

2014 Flexible 

Guideposts

Roadway 

delineation

Delineators post-mounted or on 

barrier 

$107448 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation,

especially in curves.

Lewis County -

2014 County 

Road Safety 

Improvements

Roadside Barrier- metal $1214939 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

Lincoln County -

Safety Data 

Collection

Non-infrastructure Data/traffic records $31500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data LDX 3.7 - Locate 

and inventory fixed 

objects inside the 

clear zone to 

support 

development of 

programs and 

projects to reduce 

the severity of runoff-road crashes.

Lincoln County -

Enhanced 

Pavement 

Surface 

Treatments

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

$433958 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.3 - Increase 

road surface skid 

resistance using 

high friction surface 

treatments.

Lincoln County -

FFY 2014 Safety 

- Signing 

Upgrades

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$138975 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

City of Lynnwood 

- SR 99 and SR 

524 Safety 

Improvements

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

$931000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.13 - Improve 

visibility of 

intersections by 

providing enhanced 

signing and 

delineation.

City of Lynnwood 

- SR 99 and SR 

524 Real-Time 

Adaptive Signal 

Control 

Implementation

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

signal coordination

$472500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

City of Marysville 

- Citywide 

Intersection 

Improvement 

Project

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

general retiming

$422000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 29 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

City of Marysville 

- State Ave. - 1st 

St. to 88th St. NE

Intersection traffic 

control

Intersection traffic control -

other

$1744000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections

Mason County -

Guardrail 

Improvements

Roadside Barrier- metal $291179 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

Mason County -

County Road 

Safety Plan

Non-infrastructure Transportation safety planning $90000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data

Mason County -

Bear Creek 

Dewatto Rd

Roadside Roadside grading $265864 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.2 - Design 

safer slopes and 

ditches to prevent 

rollovers.

City of Mountlake 

Terrace - 220th St 

SW Adaptive 

Signal System

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

signal coordination

$725750 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

Okanogan County 

- Run Off the 

Road Data 

Collection

Non-infrastructure Data/traffic records $27000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data LDX 3.7 - Locate 

and inventory fixed 

objects inside the 

clear zone to 

support 

development of 

programs and 

projects to reduce 

the severity of runoff-road crashes.

Okanogan County 

- 2015 Signing

Upgrades

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Sign sheeting - upgrade or 

replacement

$161671 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

Okanogan County 

- 2017 

Countywide Sign 

Safety

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

$122959 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

City of Olympia -

Pacific Avenue 

Pedestrian 

Crossing 

Improvements

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian warning signs -

add/modify flashers

$327405 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Pedestrians PED 4.2 - Invest in 

and increase the 

use of rectangular 

rapid flashing 

beacons and 

pedestrian hybrid 

beacons where 

these crosswalk 

enhancements are 

needed.

Pacific County -

Signing Upgrades

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Sign sheeting - upgrade or 

replacement

$137960 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

City of Pasco -

Oregon Avenue 

(SR 397) Corridor

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add two-way 

left-turn lane

$875900 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.3 -

Provide/improve leftand right-turn 

channelization.

City of Pasco - N. 

20th Ave. Safety 

Improvements

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian signal - Pedestrian 

Hybrid Beacon

$1373500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Pedestrians PED 4.2 - Invest in 

and increase the 

use of rectangular 

rapid flashing 

beacons and 

pedestrian hybrid 

beacons where 

these crosswalk 

enhancements are 

needed.

Pierce County -

County Safety 

Improvements

Roadway Rumble strips - center $260312 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 1.1 - Install 

centerline rumble 

strips.

Pierce County -

Guardrail 

Improvements

Roadside Barrier- metal $788818 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

Pierce County -

218th Ave E 

#88870

Speed 

management

Radar speed signs $137100 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Speeding SPE 2.5 - Support 

the limited use of 

speed feedback 

signs to warn 

motorists that they 

are exceeding the 

speed limit.

Pierce County -

High Friction 

Surface 

Treatment

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

$1172300 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.3 - Increase 

road surface skid 

resistance using 

high friction surface 

treatments.

Pierce County -

176th Street East 

Signals

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal - add 

backplates with retroreflective 

borders

$229400 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 3.2 - Add back 

plates with retroreflective borders to 

signals.

Pierce County -

38th Ave E & 

152nd St E -

Signal

Intersection traffic 

control

Intersection traffic control -

other

$769590 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 County Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

Pierce County -

Military Rd & 

Bresemann Blvd 

S Safety 

Improvements

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Medians and pedestrian refuge 

areas

$206100 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Pedestrians PED 4.1 - Improve 

safety at pedestrian 

crossings by 

investing in and 

installing refuge 

islands, and 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 31 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

shortening crossing 

distances with curb 

extensions.

Pierce County -

112th St E & A St 

E Signal

Intersection traffic 

control

Intersection traffic control -

other

$1000000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 County Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

Pierce County -

Canyon Road 

East Signals

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal - add 

backplates with retroreflective 

borders

$440100 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 3.2 - Add back 

plates with retroreflective borders to 

signals.

City of Puyallup -

River Road and 

9th St SW Safety 

Improvements

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

signal coordination

$1689000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

City of Renton -

SW 43rd St./SE 

Carr Rd./SE 

176th St./SE 

Petrovitsky Rd. 

Corridor Safety 

Project

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

general retiming

$660000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

City of Shoreline -

Radar Speed 

Sign Installations

Speed 

management

Radar speed signs $119514 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Major 

Collector

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Speeding SPE 2.5 - Support 

the limited use of 

speed feedback 

signs to warn 

motorists that they 

are exceeding the 

speed limit.

City of Shoreline -

Aurora Ave. N -

192nd to 205th

Access 

management

Raised island - install new $2178589 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.11 -

Implement restricted 

access to 

properties/driveways 

adjacent to 

intersections using 

closures or turn 

restrictions.

City of Shoreline -

Meridian Ave. N. 

and N. 155th 

Street 

Intersection 

Phase Changes

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

general retiming

$352385 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

Skagit County -

Cook Rd #63000

Intersection traffic 

control

Intersection flashers - add 

overhead (actuated)

$58400 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections INT 3.3 - Provide 

advance warning of 

intersections using 

dynamic signal 

warning flashers.

Snohomish 

County - High 

Friction Surface 

Treatment

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

$1355913 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.3 - Increase 

road surface skid 

resistance using 

high friction surface 

treatments.

City of Spokane -

Maxwell-Mission 

Roadway Roadway narrowing (road diet, 

roadway reconfiguration)

$434900 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 4.1 - Improve 

safety at pedestrian 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 32 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Avenue Lane 

Reduction

crossings by 

installing refuge 

islands, scale 

lighting, and 

shortening crossing 

distances.

City of Spokane -

Crestline Street 

Lane Reduction

Roadway Roadway narrowing (road diet, 

roadway reconfiguration)

$721200 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 4.1 - Improve 

safety at pedestrian 

crossings by 

installing refuge 

islands, scale 

lighting, and 

shortening crossing 

distances.

Spokane County -

Countywide 

Signing Upgrades

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$333000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

Spokane County -

Safety Data 

Collection & 

Evaluation

Non-infrastructure Data/traffic records $98775 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data LDX 3.7 - Locate 

and inventory fixed 

objects inside the 

clear zone to 

support 

development of 

programs and 

projects to reduce 

the severity of runoff-road crashes.

Spokane County -

2016 Spokane 

County Signal 

Safety

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

general retiming

$476300 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

Spokane County -

Glenrose Rd & 

Carnahan Rd 

Safety 

Improvements

Alignment Horizontal and vertical 

alignment

$771600 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 County Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections INT 3.1 - Redesign 

intersection 

approaches to 

improve sight 

distances.

City of Spokane 

Valley - Citywide 

Safety 

Improvements

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian warning signs -

add/modify flashers

$400000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Major 

Collector

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Systemic Pedestrians PED 4.2 - Invest in 

and increase the 

use of rectangular 

rapid flashing 

beacons and 

pedestrian hybrid 

beacons where 

these crosswalk 

enhancements are 

needed.

City of Spokane 

Valley - Pines Rd. 

(SR 27) and 

Grace Ave. 

Intersection 

Safety

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add two-way 

left-turn lane

$671050 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.3 -

Provide/improve leftand right-turn 

channelization.

City of Spokane 

Valley -

Roadway Roadway narrowing (road diet, 

roadway reconfiguration)

$608900 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 4.1 - Improve 

safety at pedestrian 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 33 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

McDonald Road 

Diet - 16th Ave N 

to Mission Ave

crossings by 

installing refuge 

islands, scale 

lighting, and 

shortening crossing 

distances.

Stevens County -

2015 Countywide 

Safety 

Improvements 

(2015 Guardrail 

Improvements)

Roadside Barrier- metal $243547 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 3.1 -

Install/maintain 

roadside safety 

hardware such as 

guardrail, cable 

barrier, concrete 

barriers, crash 

cushions, and 

others.

City of Tacoma -

Pacific Ave. (SR 

7) Corridor -

Intersection 

Signal 

Improvements

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal timing -

signal coordination

$945166 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.7 - Employ 

signal coordination.

Thurston County -

County Road 

Safety Plan

Non-infrastructure Transportation safety planning $180000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 County Highway 

Agency

Other Data

Thurston County -

Mud Bay Rd NW 

& Delphi Rd NW

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal - add 

flashing yellow arrow

$71000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 1.8 - Employ 

flashing yellow 

arrows at signals.

Thurston County -

Countywide 

Signing Upgrades

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$141600 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

Thurston County -

Steamboat Island 

Rd NW #14810

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$102600 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.4 - Install 

center and/or edge 

line rumble strips.

City of Vancouver 

- Mill Plain Blvd. -

104th to NE 

Chkalov Dr.

Access 

management

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

$2180000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections INT 1.11 -

Implement restricted 

access to 

properties/driveways 

adjacent to 

intersections using 

closures or turn 

restrictions.

City of 

Wenatchee -

Citywide 

Pedestrian Safety

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian warning signs -

add/modify flashers

$395900 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Major 

Collector

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Pedestrians PED 4.2 - Invest in 

and increase the 

use of rectangular 

rapid flashing 

beacons and 

pedestrian hybrid 

beacons where 

these crosswalk 

enhancements are 

needed.

City of 

Wenatchee -

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

$149950 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Major 

Collector

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Systemic Intersections INT 1.13 - Improve 

visibility of 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 34 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Wenatchee 

Signage Safety

intersections by 

providing enhanced 

signing and 

delineation.

City of 

Wenatchee - SR 

285 and SR 285 

Couplet - Miller

St. to Ferry St.

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian signal - Pedestrian 

Hybrid Beacon

$895952 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Pedestrians PED 4.2 - Invest in 

and increase the 

use of rectangular 

rapid flashing 

beacons and 

pedestrian hybrid 

beacons where 

these crosswalk 

enhancements are 

needed.

Whatcom County 

- County 

Roadway Safety 

Program

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$680000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.4 - Install 

center and/or edge 

line rumble strips.

Whitman County -

Countywide 

Signing & Clear 

Zone 

Improvements

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

$600000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

WSDOT -

WSDOT: SR 

285/Wenatchee 

Area - Paving

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

$74048.35 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane Departure LDX 2.1 - Improve 

roadway signing and 

shoulder 

delineation, 

especially in curves.

Spokane County -

Bigelow Gulch 

Rd. - Project 2

Roadway Roadway widening - add 

lane(s) along segment

$145800 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 County Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane Departure LDX 2.2 - Improve 

roadway geometry.

City of Seattle -

Lake City Way 

Traffic Safety 

Project

Non-infrastructure Road safety audits $400000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 City of Municipal 

Highway Agency

Spot Intersections

SR 290/Park Rd 

Railroad Crossing 

- Improvement

Railroad grade

crossings

Upgrade railroad crossing 

signal

$276105 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

SR 290/Vista Rd 

Railroad Crossing 

- Improvement

Railroad grade 

crossings

Upgrade railroad crossing

signal

$90034 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

SR 290/Pines Rd 

Railroad Crossing 

- Improvement

Railroad grade 

crossings

Upgrade railroad crossing 

signal

$174066 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

2015-2017 ER 

Regionwide Basic 

Safety - Signing

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Sign sheeting - upgrade or 

replacement

$49427 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple roads 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic depends on sign 

used

Eastern Region 

Regionwide 

Curve Warning 

Chevron Signing

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$110250 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple roads 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 35 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

ER/US 2 & US 

395 Intersection 

Improvements -

Durable Striping 

& Signing

Intersection traffic 

control

Intersection traffic control -

other

$ 1,812,755.00 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

Eastern Region 

Intersection 

Safety 

Implementation 

Program

Intersection 

geometry

$568400 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple roads 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

SR 290/Park Rd 

Railroad Crossing 

- Improvement

Railroad grade 

crossings

Railroad grade crossing gates $276105 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

SR 290/Vista Rd 

Railroad Crossing 

- Improvement

Railroad grade 

crossings

Railroad grade crossing gates $90034 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

SR 290/Pines Rd 

Railroad Crossing 

- Improvement

Railroad grade 

crossings

Railroad grade crossing gates $174066 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

2015-2017 ER 

Regionwide Basic 

Safety - Signing

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$49427 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure

Eastern Region 

Regionwide 

Curve Warning 

Chevron Signing

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$110250 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure

ER/US 2 & US 

395 Intersection 

Improvements -

Durable Striping 

& Signing

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

$1812755 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

Eastern Region 

Intersection 

Safety 

Implementation 

Program

Roadway Roadway - restripe to revise 

separation between opposing 

lanes and/or shoulder widths 

$568400 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

Eastern Region 

Guardrail 

Installation & 

Retrofit

Roadside Barrier- metal $186200 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

2015-2017 

Eastern Region 

Regionwide Basic 

Safety - Guardrail

Roadside Barrier- metal $539000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

US 2/Day Mt 

Spokane Railroad 

Crossing -

Improvement

Railroad grade 

crossings

Railroad grade crossing gates $60023 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

Eastern Region 

HMA Route 

Rumble Strips -

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$27968 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 36 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Install Rumble 

Strips

Eastern Region 

BST Rumble 

Strips A - Install 

Rumble Strip

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$20563 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

SR 26/Thacker 

Road -

Intersection 

Improvements

Intersection traffic 

control

Intersection traffic control -

other

$43595 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

SR 171/Beech St 

Intersection -

Safety 

Improvements

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometrics -

miscellaneous/other/unspecified

$72049 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

SR 283/Adams 

Road -

Intersection 

Improvements

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometrics -

miscellaneous/other/unspecified

$16660 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

SR 17/West of 

Moses Lake - Left 

Turn Lane

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

$201885 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

SR 28/5th Street 

Intersection 

Improvements

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes -

miscellaneous/other/unspecified

$81638 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

SR 28/North of 

East Wenatchee -

Safety 

Improvements

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes -

miscellaneous/other/unspecified

$33600 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

SR 28/North of 

East Wenatchee -

Two Way Left 

Turn Lane

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add two-way 

left-turn lane

$59975 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

US 2/4 Mi W of 

Waterville High 

Friction Surface 

Treatment

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

$180589 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

SR 9/Francis Rd -

Intersection 

Improvements

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal -

miscellaneous/other/unspecified

$19637 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

SR 11/Cook Road 

- Intersection 

Improvements

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal -

miscellaneous/other/unspecified

$276890 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

SR 536/SR 20 Vic 

to Mount Vernon -

Rumblestrip 

Installation

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$122067 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Northwest Region 

Guardrail 

Installation (15-

17)

Roadside Barrier- metal $46158 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 37 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

SR 9/Van Zandt -

Railroad Crossing 

Improvements

Railroad grade 

crossings

Railroad grade crossing gates $288561 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

SR 544/SR 539 to 

Everson - 

Rumblestrip 

Installation

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$289106 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Northwest Region 

Intersection 

Safety 

Implementation 

(15-17)

Roadside Roadside - other $8256 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

SR 9/Bowen Rd 

Vic. to Sumas 

Ave Vic. - 

Rumblestrip 

Installation

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$103711 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

SR 525/148th St 

SW Vic to 132nd 

St SW - Paving & 

ADA Compliance

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$176763 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Pedestrians

Northwest Region 

Guardrail Update 

(15-18)

Roadside Barrier- metal $1710100 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

SR 900/S 133rd 

St - Intersection 

Improvements 

Intersection traffic 

control

Intersection signing -

miscellaneous/other/unspecified

$989706 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

US 2/Roosevelt 

Rd Vicinity to SR 

522 Vicinity - 

Rumble Strip 

Installation 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$181960 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

SR 18/Tiger 

Mountain Pass 

Vicinity - Glare 

Screen

Roadway Roadway - other $301842 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane Departure

SR 522/Paradise 

Lake Rd Vicinity 

to Fales Rd 

Vicinity - Rumble 

Strip Installation 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$148035 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

I-5/Northbound 

Martin Luther 

King Jr Way - 

Barrier Extension

Roadside Barrier - other $411739 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

I-90/I-405 I/C -

Southbound to 

Westbound Ramp 

(090 S1 00926) - 

High Friction 

Surface

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

$225610 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 38 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

I-90/Preston 

Interchange 

Vicinity - 

Guardrail

Roadside Barrier- metal $413395 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Northwest 

Regionwide 

Curve Warning 

Signs (15-17)

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$709342 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

I-5/I-405 

Interchange - 

Southbound I-5 to 

I-405 - High 

Friction Surface

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

$335366 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure

SR 202/SR 520 to 

228th Ave NE - 

ADA Compliance 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$195037 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Pedestrians

SR 99/SR 525 

Interchange Vic to 

Lincoln Way Vic - 

ADA Compliance 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$247666 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Pedestrians

15-17 Olympic 

Region Shoulder 

Rumble Strips - 

Install Rumble 

Strips

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$54442 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

15-17 Olympic 

Region Centerline 

Rumble Strips - 

Install Rumble 

Strips

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$245160 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Olympic Region -

Intersection 

Safety 

Implementation 

Program

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - new

$196000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

Olympic Region 

Guardrail 

Installations

Roadside Barrier- metal $41332 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

SR 397/S Yew St 

Vicinity - 

Roadside 

Improvements 

Roadside Barrier - other $249693 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

SR 397/E 

Bruneau Ave - 

Railroad Crossing 

Improvements 

Railroad grade 

crossings

Railroad grade crossing gates $63092 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

SR 240/Airport 

Way - Railroad 

Crossing 

Improvements 

Railroad grade 

crossings

Railroad grade crossing gates $7036 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 39 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

SR 

240/Kennewick 

Vicinity - Install 4-

Strand Cable 

Median Barrier 

Roadside Barrier - cable $79474 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

SR 240/SR 

224/Van Giesen 

Street -

Intersection 

Improvements 

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other $30874 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

I-182/Pasco 

Vicinity - Install 4-

Strand Cable 

Median Barrier 

Roadside Barrier - cable $419439 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

15-17 SCR -

Guardrail 

Installations

Roadside Barrier- metal $39200 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

US 12/Yakima 

Vicinity - Install 4-

Strand Cable 

Median Barrier 

Roadside Barrier - cable $215282 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

SR 241/Forsell 

Rd/Green Valley 

Rd - Intersection 

Improvements 

Roadway 

delineation

Roadway delineation - other $381417 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

US 97/McDonald 

Rd and Becker 

Rd - Intersection 

Improvements 

Intersection traffic 

control

Intersection traffic control -

other

$11870 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Collector

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

US 97/2nd Ave 

Vicinity -

Roadside 

Improvements 

Roadside Roadside - other $66732 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

I-82/Yakima 

Vicinity - Install 4-

Strand Cable 

Median Barrier 

Roadside Barrier - cable $1201220 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

15-17 SCR 

Region Wide 

Basic Safety -

Signing

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

$19200 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure

SCR Region 

Wide Curve 

Warning Signing -

Chevron 

Alignment 2

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$452995 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

US 97/Old 

Highway 10 -

Railroad Crossing 

Improvements

Railroad grade 

crossings

Railroad grade crossings - other $96267 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 40 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

SR 240/Steptoe 

Roundabout 

Improvements 

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify control - modifications to 

roundabout

$145649 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

15-17 SCR -

Intersection 

Safety 

Implementation 

Program

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other $25536 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections

US 97/Branch 

Road -

Intersection 

Improvements

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other $7278 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

US 97/SR 22 -

Intersection 

Improvements

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other $537477 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

SR 4 and SR 432 

Centerline 

Rumble Strips -

Safety 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$279663 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure

SR 503, 503 

Spur, 504 and 

505 - Centerline 

Rumble Strips 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$65753 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure

SR 503/Padden 

Parkway -

Intersection 

Improvements 

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other $287845 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

I-5/NB NE 39th St 

& SR 500/NE 

15th Ave -

Intersection 

Improvements 

Intersection traffic 

control

Intersection traffic control -

other

$164483 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

I-5/Northbound 

Off Ramp at 

Fourth Plain Blvd 

- Intersection 

Improvements

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other $403985 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

SWR Regionwide 

Basic Safety -

Guardrail 2015-17

Roadside Barrier- metal $368000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

SWR -

Regionwide 

Curve Warning 

Signing Phase II

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

$169540 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

SWR -

Intersection 

Safety 

Implementation 

Program

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other $50960 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

SWR Regionwide 

Safety - Shoulder 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

$333200 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 41 of 71

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Rumble Strips 

Phase 1

SW Region/Clark 

County Locations 

- High Friction 

Surfacing

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

$392000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

multiple locations 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 42 of 71

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Fatalities 521 492 460 454 438 436 462 551 537

Serious Injuries 2,552 2,648 2,478 2,135 2,199 1,917 2,005 2,100 2,209

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 0.940 0.871 0.804 0.797 0.774 0.762 0.796 0.924 0.900

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

4.603 4.690 4.333 3.748 3.885 3.351 3.453 3.520 3.703

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

73 71 69 79 87 61 85 100 106

Number of non-motorized 

serious injuries

401 399 408 402 447 343 408 393 487
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 43 of 71

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Annual Fatalities

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Annual Serious Injuries

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 44 of 71

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 45 of 71

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

1. Fatality data is from the preliminary 2016 Q4 release based on the Annual Report File (ARF). Note that the 

ARF is used because final FARS data is only available up to 2014. 

2. Serious injury data is from the WSDOT Engineering Crash Database and represents reported crashes 

involving at least one motor vehicle and meeting the requirements of RCW 46.52.070, RCW 46.52.030 and 

WAC 446-85-010. 

Describe fatality data source.

FARS

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Fatality data is from the preliminary 2016 Q4 release of the WA-FARS Analytical File, and the final 2015 WAFARS, the best available data. Final NHTSA FARS data is only available up to 2014. 

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and ownership.

Year 2016

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Fatalities and Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 46 of 71

Functional Classification Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Principal Arterial -

Interstate

22.8 47.6 0.5 1.05

Rural Principal Arterial -

Other Freeways and 

Expressways

64.4 42.8 3.73 2.5

Rural Principal Arterial -

Other

0 93.8 0 4.24

Rural Minor Arterial 42.2 85.6 1.98 4.03

Rural Minor Collector 81.6 49 2.31 1.38

Rural Major Collector 18.8 0.2 1.75 0.02

Rural Local Road or Street 26.8 0.2 2.33 0.02

Urban Principal Arterial -

Interstate

33 116 0.29 1.01

Urban Principal Arterial -

Other Freeways and 

Expressways

21.2 102.8 0.39 1.86

Urban Principal Arterial -

Other

78.8 199.2 0.84 2.14

Urban Minor Arterial 54.8 64.4 0.72 0.84

Urban Minor Collector 22.8 8.4 0.68 0.25

Urban Major Collector 0.6 0 0.56 0

Urban Local Road or Street 36.8 0 0.78 0
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 47 of 71

Year 2016

Roadways Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

State Highway Agency 225.6 810.2 0.69 2.49

County Highway Agency 136 490.4 1.43 5.17

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

0 0 0 0

City of Municipal Highway 

Agency

123 785.4 0.75 4.77

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

0 0 0 0

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

0 0 0 0

Other State Agency 0 0 0 0

Other Local Agency 0 0 0 0

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

0 0 0 0

Railroad 0 0 0 0

State Toll Authority 0 0 0 0

Local Toll Authority 0 0 0 0

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, University)

0 0 0 0

Indian Tribe Nation 0 0 0 0
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 48 of 71

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities by Functional Classification 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 49 of 71

0

50

100

150

200

250

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries by Functional 

Classification 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 50 of 71

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) by Functional 

Classification 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 51 of 71

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) by Functional 

Classification 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 52 of 71

0

50

100

150

200

250

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities by Roadway Ownership 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 53 of 71

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries by Roadway 

Ownership 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 54 of 71

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) by Roadway 

Ownership 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 55 of 71

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Notes for functional class safety performance metrics: 

1. The VMT reflects the official HPMS VMT by functional class. 

2. The number of fatalities reported reflects the number of fatalities on all public roads. 

3. The number of serious injuries reported reflects those that occurred on the state owned highway system: 

functional class information is not available on the non-state highway system for serious injuries. XY 

coordinates are only available for serious injury crashes from 2010 onwards (i.e. serious injuries sustained in 

2008 and 2009 do not have associated XY coordinates). 

4. Any serious injury rates for facilities other than interstates or freeways would not reflect actual serious injury 

rates because the VMT reported is for all public roads while the serious injuries reported only reflect those 

injuries sustained on state highways. 

5. The HSIP reporting system does not allow WSDOT to specify an 'Other' functional class category which 

would reflect the serious injuries on non-state highways. 

Note for ownership safety performance metrics:

1. The City of Municipal Highway Agency category reflect both city and roads classified as miscellaneous. 

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) by Roadway 

Ownership 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 56 of 71

Are there any other aspects of the general highway safety trends on which the State would like to 

elaborate?

No

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets

Calendar Year 2018 Targets * 

Number of Fatalities 415.5 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

The rolling 5-year average for 2012 through 2016 was used as the baseline (484.8). 

This baseline was then projected using a straight line to a zero fatality value in the year 

2030 (consistent with the target for fatalities set in Target Zero, the WA state SHSP). 

Number of Serious Injuries 1788.0 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

The rolling 5-year average for 2012 through 2016 was used as the baseline (2086). 

This baseline was then projected using a straight line to a zero fatality value in the year 

2030 (consistent with the target for fatalities set in Target Zero, the WA state SHSP). 

Fatality Rate 0.709 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

The rolling 5-year average for 2012 through 2016 was used as the baseline (0.828). 

This baseline was then projected using a straight line to a zero fatality value in the year 

2030 (consistent with the target for fatalities set in Target Zero, the WA state SHSP). 

Serious Injury Rate 3.058 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

The rolling 5-year average for 2012 through 2016 was used as the baseline (3.568). 

This baseline was then projected using a straight line to a zero fatality value in the year 

2030 (consistent with the target for fatalities set in Target Zero, the WA state SHSP). 

Total Number of Non-Motorized 

Fatalities and Serious Injuries 431.4 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 57 of 71

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

The rolling 5-year average for 2012 through 2016 was used as the baseline (503). This 

baseline was then projected using a straight line to a zero fatality value in the year 

2030 (consistent with the target for fatalities set in Target Zero, the WA state SHSP). 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

1. Fatality data is from the preliminary 2016 Q4 release of the WA-FARS Analytical File, and the final 2015 

WA-FARS, the best available data (final NHTSA FARS data is only available up to 2014). 

2. Serious injury data is from the WSDOT Engineering Crash Database and represents reported crashes 

involving at least one motor vehicle and meeting the requirements of RCW 46.52.070, RCW 46.52.030 and 

WAC 446-85-010. 

3. The rolling 5-year average for 2012-2016 is used as the baseline for the target setting. A 'Target Zero 

approach' is followed for the proposed target setting method. Using the baseline point, a straight line is 

projected to a zero value at 2030 (the Target Zero goal). The proposed target, using this method, is set for 

2018. 

4. VMT data used for the target setting are from the state HPMS (Submittal June 2017) 

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish safety performance 

targets. 

WSDOT has spent over a year working with its state highway safety partners in establishing safety performance 

targets. It worked with the SHSO first to come to early agreement on potential methods in developing 

performance targets. The Department proposed to maintain its zero goal based on its recent update 

of Washington's SHSP. While there were concerns, the SHSO agreed. The DOT and SHSO worked closely to 

ensure common definitions, methods and data rules for during the assessment period. The DOT and SHSO also 

met with its federal partners to ensure both the state and federal approaches were consistent and agreed to with 

all parties. The Department made significant effort to involve the MPOs in target setting, and regularly met with 

a technical committee, working group and oversight group to answer questions and receive input as the 

Agencies move forward on target setting. The Department has developed a data portal and a spreadsheet tool for 

use by the MPOs, and has provided and analyzed data as requested by MPOs.

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

Yes
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 58 of 71

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries for the past seven years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number of Older Driver and 

Pedestrian Fatalities

43 61 71 61 60 81 90

Number of Older Driver and 

Pedestrian Serious Injuries

136 178 150 148 150 160 169

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

# of Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Years

Number of Older Driver and Pedestrian Fatalities and Serious Injuries by 

Year.

Fatalities Serious Injuries
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 59 of 71

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP?

Change in fatalities and serious injuries

Benefit/Cost Ratio

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

While HSIP effectiveness has historically been tracked using B/C for each project (and overall), that is now 

shifting to a measure of the change in fatalities and serious injuries overall. This is due to the fact that a greater 

proportion of projects are now risk-based, which is not something measurable by a typical B/C ratio. 

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of the State's program 

level evaluations.

While fatal and serious injury crashes have been on the rise across all jurisdictional road types since a low in 

2013, we continue to measure overall progress by jurisdictional type of road (state, county, city). Since each of 

these jurisdiction types is primarily funded through separate programs within the HSIP, this seems like a 

reasonable approach to monitor progress. 

For projects completed in calendar year 2012, we compare the 5-year rolling average from 2008-2012 with the 

5-year rolling average from 2012-2016. This overlaps the year 2012 in each data set, which then is really a 

comparison of the 4 years before the projects were completed with the 4 years after the projects were 

completed. By jurisdictional road type, those comparisons show: 

State Highways: 2008-2012 = 802.8 fatal/serious crashes vs 2012-2016 = 708.6 fatal/serious crashes, or a 12% 

decrease.

County Roads: 2008-2012 = 647.8 fatal/serious crashes vs 2012-2016 = 533.2 fatal/serious crashes, or an 18% 

decrease.

City Streets: 2008-2012 = 994.8 fatal/serious crashes vs 2012-2016 = 950.4 fatal/serious crashes, or a 4% 

decrease.

Note that state highways that serve as city streets (in cities of 25,000+ population) are included in the city 

streets data here.

This data seems to highlight that the full systemic safety approach on county roadways, implemented in 2010 

(with projects being completed primarily in 2012-2013), is showing some effectiveness (with a greater decrease 

than that seen on state or city roadways). Additional years of data and years of investment on the county road 

network in this manner should help to solidify these early results. 

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and success of the 

Highway Safety Improvement Program?
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 60 of 71

More systemic programs

Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process

Increased focus on local road safety

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The HSIP shows success through increased awareness of safety and data-driven processes. This is accomplished 

through the fact that the HSIP programs are structured to deliver projects that support the SHSP. These 

programs thus emphasize to local agencies the focus/goals/vision of the SHSP (eliminating fatalities and serious 

injuries) and encourage use of data-driven processes and proven strategies. 

The HSIP also shows success through increased focus on local road safety. This is accomplished primarily by 

the state's commitment to provide HSIP funding to local agencies through a data-driven approach that shares the 

proportionate share of funds with the local agencies based on their fatal and serious injury crashes. 

In addition, the HSIP shows success through the addition of more systemic programs. Both a portion of state 

HSIP funds and city HSIP funds are now dedicated to systemic safety programs. And all of the county HSIP 

funds are dedicated to systemic safety efforts.

Are there any significant programmatic changes that have occurred since the last reporting period? 

No

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures.

Year 2016

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted 

Crash Type

Number of

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality 

Rate

(per 

HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious 

Injury Rate

(per 

HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Other 1 Other 2 Other 3

Lane Departure 251.6 812.2 0.43 1.39

Pedestrians 75.8 310.4 0.13 0.53

Bicyclists 12 105.2 0.02 0.18

Motorcyclists 75.6 378.2 0.13 0.65

Work Zones 3.4 28 0 0.05

Speeding-involved 163.6 540.6 0.28 0.92
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 61 of 71

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted 

Crash Type

Number of

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality 

Rate

(per 

HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious 

Injury Rate

(per 

HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Other 1 Other 2 Other 3

Young driver age 16-25 

involved

153 711.4 0.26 1.22

Unrestrained passenger 

vehicle occupant

103 219.2 0.18 0.38

Unlicensed driver-involved 89.2 28.2 0.15 0.05

Opposite Direction Multivehicle (Headon)72 219 0.12 0.38

Older Driver-Involved (age 

70+)

63 184.2 0.11 0.31

Heavy Truck-Involved 

(GVWR>10,000 lbs)

43 117.6 0.07 0.2

Drowsy Driver-Involved 14.8 66.4 0.03 0.11

Wildlife 2.2 15.6 0 0.03

Vehicle-Train 1 1.4 0 0

School bus-involved 0.8 5 0 0.01

Impairment involved 275.6 429.4 0.47 0.74

Distraction involved 147.2 537.6 0.25 0.91

Intersection related 103.4 730.2 0.18 1.25

Run off the road 179.6 593.2 0.31 1.01
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 62 of 71

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 63 of 71

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The fatalities, serious injuries, and VMT are based on the official MAP-21 snapshot. The emphasis areas are 

consistent with the SHSP, Target Zero (2016). 

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 64 of 71

Has the State completed any countermeasure effectiveness evaluations during the reporting period?

No

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 65 of 71

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL INJURY

BEFORE

ALL INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

NA

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Are there any other aspects of the overall HSIP effectiveness on which the State would like to elaborate?

No
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 66 of 71

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative?

 08/18/2016 

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP?

From: 2012 To: 2014 

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update?

 2019 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

MIRE NAME (MIRE NO.) STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY SEGMENT

Segment Identifier (12) 100 100 100 100 100 98

Route Number (8) 100 100

Route/Street Name (9) 100 100

Federal Aid/Route Type 

(21)

100 100

Rural/Urban Designation 

(20)

100 100 100 100

Surface Type (23) 100 9 100 100

Begin Point Segment 

Descriptor (10)

100 100 100 100 100 98

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11)

100 100 100 100 100 98

Segment Length (13) 100 100

Direction of Inventory (18) 100 100

Functional Class (19) 100 100 100 100 100 98

Median Type (54) 100 5
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 67 of 71

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

MIRE NAME (MIRE NO.) STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Access Control (22) 100 10

One/Two Way Operations 

(91)

100 100

Number of Through Lanes 

(31)

100 100 100 100

Average Annual Daily 

Traffic (79)

100 100 100 0

AADT Year (80) 100 100

Type of Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100 100 100 100 100

INTERSECTION

Unique Junction Identifier 

(120)

0 0

Location Identifier for 

Road 1 Crossing Point 

(122)

100 100

Location Identifier for 

Road 2 Crossing Point 

(123)

100 100

Intersection/Junction 

Geometry (126)

100 100

Intersection/Junction 

Traffic Control (131)

100 5

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road (79)

100 100

AADT Year (80) 100 100

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139)

100 100

INTERCHANGE/RAMP

Unique Interchange 

Identifier (178)

100 100

Location Identifier for 

Roadway at Beginning of 

Ramp Terminal (197)

100 100

Location Identifier for 

Roadway at Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201)

100 100

Ramp Length (187) 100 100

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195)

100 100
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 68 of 71

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

MIRE NAME (MIRE NO.) STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Roadway Type at End 

Ramp Terminal (199)

100 100

Interchange Type (182) 0 0

Ramp AADT (191) 75 100

Year of Ramp AADT (192) 100 100

Functional Class (19) 100 100

Type of Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100

Totals (Average Percent 

Complete):

100.00 84.67 87.50 75.63 88.64 90.91 100.00 88.89 100.00 98.40

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Many current production data elements have been collected over a period of decades with varying degrees of precision and accuracy. We also know that changes to the system take place without our 

knowledge/involvement, such as a local developer doing work on our highway system that isn’t always captured on a highway construction contract. In other words, we can’t report what we don’t know.

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026.

WSDOT is in the process of implementing ESRI’s Roads and Highways and Transcend Tools that will help us capture the remaining elements on our state routes and CRAB is in the process of forming a MIRE technical steering committee 

for the purpose of coordinating the collection the counties MIRE FDE’s elements. WSDOT has been invited to participate on this committee which should also help bridge any gaps we may have between state and county roadways. The 

challenge is going to be getting the local system collected which is where we would rely on the Local Programs Office for outreach and coordination with local agencies to help with this effort. 

 

 

 

Jurisdiction Estimated Percent complete Approximate accuracy of estimate 

WSDOT (state) 94% +/- 90% 

WSDOT (local) 20% +/- 60% 

CRAB (county) 65% +/- 80% 

Federal 20% +/- 60% 

Tribal 20% +/- 60% 

Non-DOT (state) 50% +/- 60% 

 

Provide the suspected serious injury identifier, definition and attributes used by the State for both the crash report form and the crash database using the table below. Please also indicate whether or not these elements are 

compliant with the MMUCC 4th edition criteria for data element P5. Injury Status, suspected serious injury. 
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 69 of 71

CRITERIA SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY 

IDENTIFIER(NAME) MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY DEFINITION MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY ATTRIBUTES(DESCRIPTORS) MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * 

Crash Report Form Serious Injury No N/A No N/A No

Crash Report Form Instruction Manual Suspected Serious Injury Yes Suspected Serious Injury (Serious Injury) –

applies to any injury other than fatal

that results in one or more of the following: 

Severe lacerations resulting in

exposure of underlying 

tissues/muscle/organs or resulting in 

significant loss of blood, broken or distorted 

extremity, crush injuries, suspected skull, 

chest, or abdominal injury other than 

bruises or minor lacerations, significant 

burns, unconsciousness when taken from 

the scene, paralysis.

Yes N/A Yes

Crash Database Suspected Serious Injury Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes

Crash Database Data Dictionary Suspected Serious Injury Yes Applies when law enforcement officer 

observes any injury that results in one or 

more of the following:

•Severe lacerations resulting in exposure of 

underlying tissues/muscle/organs or 

resulting in significant loss of blood

•Broken or distorted extremity (arm or 

leg)or Crush injuries 

•Suspected skull, chest or abdominal injury 

other than bruises or minor lacerations

•Significant burns (2nd/3rd degree over 

10% or more of the body)

•Unconsciousness when taken from the 

crash scene

Paralysis

Yes N/A Yes

Please describe the actions the State is taking to become compliant by April 15, 2019.

The Washington Traffic Safety Commission has funded a joint project with The Washington State Patrol and Department of Transportation to update Washington’s Crash Report and Crash Report Instruction Manual to better align with the 

recently released MMUCC 5th Edition. This effort will include the MMUCC 4th Edition criteria for P5, Injury Status, Suspected Serious Injury and is scheduled to be released to law enforcement on January 1, 2019. 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

 

Did the State conduct an HSIP program assessment during the reporting period?

No

When does the State plan to complete it’s next HSIP program assessment.

2020 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

We will discuss with our FHWA Division on timing.
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 70 of 71

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

Project Implementation:

Washington State HSIP Projects.xlsm

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

Compliance Assessment:
2017 Washington Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 71 of 71

Glossary

5 year rolling 

average 

means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data (e.g. annual 

fatality rate). 

Emphasis area means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process. 

Highway safety 

improvement 

project 

means strategies, activities and projects on a public road that are consistent with a State 

strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous road location or 

feature or addresses a highway safety problem. 

HMVMT means hundred million vehicle miles traveled. 

Non-infrastructure 

projects 

are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of non-infrastructure projects 

include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, improvements in the 

collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement activities. 

Older driver special 

rule 

applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and pedestrians over 

the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which data are 

available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013. 

Performance 

measure 

means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to monitor changes 

in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and objectives. 

Programmed funds mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects. 

Roadway 

Functional 

Classification 

means the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, 

according to the character of service they are intended to provide. 

Strategic Highway 

Safety Plan (SHSP) 

means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on safety data developed by a 

State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148. 

Systematic refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across a 

system. 

Systemic safety 

improvement 

means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high risk roadway features 

that are correlated with specific severe crash types. 

Transfer 

means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned 

for the fiscal year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.