alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7366

LOUIS ROY CHAPMAN, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Departmentof Corrections; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-848) Submitted: December 18, 2001 Decided: January 14, 2002 Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis Ray Chapman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Louis Roy Chapman, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) and denying his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sorders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Chapman v. Angelone , No. CA-00-848 (E.D. Va. July 12 & Aug. 6, 2001). We deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and deny Chapman’s motion for appoinment of counsel. Finally, we dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### William Carroll ANDERSON and Everett Phillips, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-99.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 4, 1971.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, fof appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek reversal of the final judgment of conviction and sentence imposed on them consequent upon their plea of guilty to the lesser included offense of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Appellants were represented at the trial by the public defender.

By their brief appellants present for consideration the single point of whether they were properly advised of their constitutional rights when they tendered their plea of guilty on which is based the judgment here assaulted. Although appellants do not specify in their brief the constitutional rights of which the trial court failed to advise them, we assume they refer to the right to be informed of the nature of the charge against them and the consequences of their plea of guilty together with their right to tender their plea voluntarily without coercion, intimidation, inducements, ignorance or incomprehension as spoken of by the Supreme Court of the United States in Boykin v. Alabama.1

Reference to the record on appeal affirmatively establishes that prior to accepting appellants’ plea of guilty, the trial court made an independent determination that such pleas were given intelligently and voluntarily. Although the mechanics by which such determination was made do not affirmatively appear from the record, it is our view that the trial court substantially complied with the requirements set forth by this court in its decision rendered in the case of McPherson v. State *2***and later re-' affirmed in the case of Moore v. State.3

The judgment appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

1

. Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).

2

. McPherson v. State (Fla.App.1970), 237 So.2d 18.

3

.Moore v. State (Fla.App.1970), 241 So. 2d 868.
#### Michael Glenn FARTHING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-794.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 29, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### In Re Three MINOR CHILDREN

High Court of American Samoa Trial Division

JR Nos. 68-91, 69-91 and 70-91

January 29, 1993

Before RICHMOND, Associate Justice, and TAUANU'U, Chief Associate Judge,

Counsel: For Minor Children and Petitioners, Roger K. Hazell

Opinion and Order:

This matter came on regularly for hearing on January 15, 1993, upon the natural parents’ petitions to relinquish their parental rights to their three minor children to enable the children’s availability for adoption by their paternal grandmother.

The three children are, respectively, ages four, five and six years. They live with their father, age 37 years, and mother, age 30 years, who love their children and provide significantly for their children’s emotional and physical care. Their grandmother, age 68 years, lives nearby. At this time, this family group’s income is derived principally, if not entirely, from the grandmother’s retirement pay and Social Security benefits, and another, unmarried son’s earnings. Clearly, she contributes financially and in immeasurable ways to her grandchildren’s upbringing.

The parents’ desire to relinquish their parental rights appears to be voluntarily motivated in recognition of the grandmother’s kindness towards their children and their impecunious situation. The father apparently suffers from an emotional disorder and does not maintain steady employment. The mother is unemployed.

The grandmother appears to still be in good health. However, she foresees the day in due course when her grandchildren will return to their loving parents’ total care. She also knows that the family members presently living together are close-knit in the Samoan way of life. She *2admits that the real purpose for the adoption is enhancement of Social Security benefits.

Relinquishment of parental rights must be predicated on the best interests of all concerned. A.S.C.A. § 45.0402(e). The circumstances here are factored on the grandmother’s and parents’ immediate best interests. Higher Social Security benefits are not, as such, detrimental the children’s interests. However, disruption of the natural relationships existing in this situation is not in the children’s more important, long-term best interests.

The petitions should be and are denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3222 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3222

  To ensure the security of office space rented by Senators, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2023

  Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ensure the security of office space rented by Senators, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SECURITY OF OFFICE SPACE RENTED BY SENATORS.

    Section 3 of the Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1975 (2 
U.S.C. 6317) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (12) as 
                subparagraphs (A) through (L), respectively;
                    (B) by striking ``The aggregate'' and inserting 
                ``(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the aggregate''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) The aggregate square feet of office space for purposes of 
paragraph (1) shall not include any portion of the office space used 
for security or safety enhancements that are--
            ``(A) of a kind authorized by the Committee on Rules and 
        Administration of the Senate, which shall include an 
        information technology security closet and a secure lobby or 
        reception area; and
            ``(B) approved by the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of 
        the Senate.''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(1)--
                    (A) by striking ``The maximum'' and inserting ``(A) 
                Subject to subparagraph (B), the maximum''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(B) The portion of the cost of a rental described in subparagraph 
(A) that is attributable to building security and safety measures shall 
not be included in determining the annual rate paid for the rental for 
purposes of subparagraph (A) if--
            ``(i) the costs are for building security and safety 
        measures--
                    ``(I) of a kind authorized by the Committee on 
                Rules and Administration of the Senate, which shall 
                include guard services, access control, and facility 
                monitoring; and
                    ``(II) approved by the Sergeant at Arms and 
                Doorkeeper of the Senate; and
            ``(ii) such costs are itemized separately in a manner 
        approved by the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the 
        Senate.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52990-52991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-183-006]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Filing of Tariff 
Sheets

October 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 1, 1997, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1:

Third Revised Sheet No. 147
Second Revised Sheet No. 148
Second Revised Sheet No. 149
First Revised Sheet No. 206C
First Revised Sheet No. 206D
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 207
First Revised Sheet No. 207A

[[Page 52991]]

Original Sheet No. 207B

    Texas Gas states that the instant filing is being made to comply 
with the Commission's Order dated June 30, 1997, in response to Texas 
Gas's April 28, 1997, filing regarding GISB Standards in accordance 
with Order Nos. 587-C and 587-D.
    Texas Gas copies of the tariff sheets are being served upon Texas 
Gas's jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions, and 
all parties on the official service list in Docket No. RP97-183.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26958 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
258 La. 996

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert GREEN.

No. 50925.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 7, 1971.

Perrell Fuselier, for plaintiff-appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Alfred R. Ryder, Dist. Atty., for defendant-appellee.

BARHAM, Justice.

Under a bill of information charging theft of property valued at $35.00, Robert Green was convicted and sentenced to 18 months in the penitentiary. He has appealed.

 The six bills of exception which the minutes note were reserved were never perfected and are not included in the transcript.* Under Code of Criminal Procedure *109Article 920 our review is therefore limited to an examination for error discoverable by mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings. We find no such error.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

*

 In brief filed in this court counsel for defendant argues only one alleged error, and in this connection has attached to his brief a document entitled “Bill of Exception No. 5”, which has been signed by the judge. There is nothing to show when the bill was presented to and signed by the judge, and since it was not filed in the record of appeal before us, we must assume that it was not timely perfected. We do not consider this bill. We note also, for the trial court’s future benefit, that although the minutes show that the defendant moved for and was granted an appeal, we find in the record no order of appeal or return date for the appeal.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27872]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Commissioner's Advisory Group: Public Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting of Commissioner's Advisory Group.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public meeting of the Commissioner's Advisory Group (CAG) will 
be held in Washington, D.C.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 6, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Merci del Toro at (202) 622-5081 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988), 
that a public meeting of the CAG will be held on November 6, 1997, 
beginning at 9 a.m., in Room 3313, main IRS building, 1111 Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. 20224.
    The agenda will include the following topics: various IRS issue 
updates and reports by the CAG subgroups on notification of Appeals 
rights and process; customer service initiatives; small business issues 
and initiatives; education and training initiatives; and, Federal tax 
deposit rules.

    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda or order of topic 
discussion are possible and could prevent effective advance notice.

    The meeting will be in a room that accommodates approximately 50 
people, including CAG members and IRS officials. Due to the limited 
conference space and security specifications, notification of intent to 
attend the meeting must be made with Lorenza Wilds. Ms. Wilds can be 
reached at (202) 622-6440 (not toll-free). Attendees are encouraged to 
arrive early to allow enough time to clear security at the 1111 
Constitution Avenue, NW entrance.
    If you would like to have the CAG consider a written statement, 
please call (202) 622-5081 or write: Merci del Toro, Office of Public 
Liaison, C:I, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Room 3308 IR, Washington, D.C. 20224.
    Dated: October 9, 1997
Michael P. Dolan,
Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
[FR Doc. 97-27872 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3190 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to exclude as income certain 

payments received by household members from certain employment programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2023 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. RICKETTS) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 

Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to exclude 

as income certain payments received by household members from certain employment programs, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Training and Nutrition 

5 Stability Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3190 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN INCOME FROM EMPLOY2 MENT AND TRAINING PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5 of the Food and Nutri4 tion Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2014) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (d)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (18), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

7 at the end; 

8 (B) in paragraph (19)(B), by striking the 

9 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(20) any payment, income, allowance, or earn12 ings made to household members derived from— 

13 ‘‘(A) any work program (as defined in sec14 tion 6(o)(1)), unless the work program is estab15 lished under— 

16 ‘‘(i) the Post-9/11 Veterans Edu17 cational Assistance Improvements Act of 

18 2010 (Public Law 111–377; 124 Stat. 

19 4106) or amendments made by that Act; 

20 ‘‘(ii) the Harry W. Colmery Veterans 

21 Educational Assistance Act of 2017 (Pub22 lic Law 115–48; 131 Stat. 973) or amend23 ments made by that Act; or 

24 ‘‘(iii) the COVID–19 Veterans Rapid 

25 Retraining Assistance Program; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3190 IS

1 ‘‘(B) any employment and training pro2 gram (as defined in paragraph (4) of section 

3 6(d)) established pursuant to that section; 

4 ‘‘(C) any vocational rehabilitation program 

5 (as defined in section 3 of the Workforce Inno6 vation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102)); 

7 or 

8 ‘‘(D) any refugee employment program es9 tablished under section 412(c) of the Immigra10 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1522(c)).’’; 

11 (2) by striking subsection (l); and 

12 (3) by redesignating subsections (m) and (n) as 

13 subsections (l) and (m), respectively. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 6(s)(2) of 

15 the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2015(s)(2)) 

16 is amended by striking ‘‘(m), and (n)’’ and inserting ‘‘and 

17 (m)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Robert Edward THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-60.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District

Jan. 23, 1970.

Leonard L. Stafford, Public Defender, and Richard A. Bird, Asst. Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and J. Terrell Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no harmful error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Departmental Office; Debt Management Advisory Committee; Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. Sec. 10(a)(2), 
that a meeting will be held at the U.S. Treasury Department, 15th and 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., on October 28 and 29, 
1997, of the following debt management advisory committee: The Bond 
Market Trade Association, Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee.
    The agenda for the meeting provides for a technical background 
briefing by Treasury staff on October 28, followed by a charge by the 
Secretary of the Treasury or his designate that the committee discuss 
particular issues, and a working session. On October 29, the committee 
will present a written report of its recommendations.
    The background briefing by Treasury staff will be held at 11:30 
a.m. Eastern time on October 28 and will be open to the public. The 
remaining sessions on October 28 and the committee's reporting session 
on October 29, will be closed to the public pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 
Sec. 10(d).
    This notice shall constitute my determination, pursuant to the 
authority placed in heads of departments by 5 U.S.C. App. Sec. 10(d) 
and vested in me by the Treasury Department Order No. 101-05, that the 
closed portions of the meeting are concerned with information that is 
exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(9)(A). The public 
interest requires that such meetings be closed to the public because 
the Treasury Department requires frank and full advice from 
representatives of the financial community prior to making its final 
decision on major financing operations. Historically, this advice has 
been offered by debt management advisory committees established by the 
several major segments of the financial community. When so utilized, 
such a committee is recognized to be an advisory committee under 5 
U.S.C. App. Sec. 3.
    Although the Treasury's final announcement of financing plans may 
not reflect the recommendations provided in reports of the advisory 
committee, premature disclosure of the committee's deliberations and 
reports would be likely to lead to significant financial speculation in 
the securities market. Thus, these meetings fall within the exemption 
covered by 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(9)(A).
    The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Markets is 
responsible for maintaining records of debt management advisory 
committee meetings and for providing annual reports setting forth a 
summary of committee activities and such other matters as may be 
informative to the public consistent with the policy of 5 U.S.C. 
Sec. 552b.

    Dated: October 1, 1997.
Gary Gensler,
Assistant Secretary (Financial Markets).
[FR Doc. 97-26490 Filed 10-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Motorvehicle use map. Bienville National Forest, Mississippi**
 
2013 | 2016| 2017
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:B 47/3/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:000912160
 
June 28, 2018