0 | P a g e

Amendment No. 1

and Amendment No. 13-04 to the 

2013 Federal Transportation 

Improvement Program

ADOPTED JUNE 2013
1 | P a g e

Table of Contents

Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2

Project Modifications..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3

Modifications to FTIP Projects................................................................................................................................................................................... 4

Modifications to RTP Projects.................................................................................................................................................................................. 30

Fiscal Impact................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 36

Fiscal Impact Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 36

Senate Bill 375 and the Sustainable Communities Strategy........................................................................................................................................ 37

Transportation Conformity .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 38

Regional Emissions Analysis..................................................................................................................................................................................... 39

South Central Coast Air Basin – Ventura County Portion ........................................................................................................................................ 40

South Coast Air Basin............................................................................................................................................................................................... 40

Western Mojave Desert Air Basin – Los Angeles County (Antelope Valley Portion) and San Bernardino County (Western Portion of MDAB) .... 44

Mojave Desert Air Basin – San Bernardino County Portion Excluding Searles Valley ............................................................................................. 44

Mojave Desert Air Basin – Searles Valley portion of San Bernardino County ......................................................................................................... 44

Salton Sea Air Basin – Imperial County Portion....................................................................................................................................................... 45

Public Review and Comment ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 46

Comments and Responses....................................................................................................................................................................................... 47

Conclusion.................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48

Attachments: Public Comments
2 | P a g e

Introduction

On April 4, 2013, the Southern California Association of 

Governments (SCAG) adopted the 2012-2035 Regional 

Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS)

for the six-county region including Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, 

Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties. The 2012-2035 

RTP/SCS represents the region’s commitment to reduce emissions 

from transportation sources to comply with Senate Bill (SB) 375 , 

improve public health, and meet the National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards set forth by the federal Clean Air Act.

A major component of the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS is a Project List 

containing thousands of individual transportation projects that aim 

to improve the region’s mobility and air quality, and revitalize our 

economy. Since its adoption, some of these projects have 

experienced technical changes that are time-sensitive and require 

amendments to the RTP/SCS and the Federal Transportation 

Improvement Program (FTIP) in order to allow these projects to 

move forward in a timely manner.

The purpose of this document is to identify the project changes

being made via Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

the associated Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP, and provide 

documentation demonstrating that the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS as 

amended will continue to comply with federal and state 

requirements, including the recently-enacted Moving Ahead for 

Progress for the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) metropolitan planning 

requirements, the Transportation Conformity Rule, and SB 375. An 

Addendum to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS Program Environmental 

Impact Report (PEIR) has also been prepared to assess proposed 

changes to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS Project List as detailed herein.
3 | P a g e

Project Modifications

The project changes identified in Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-

2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP can be 

broadly categorized as follows:

 Project is new and is not currently included in the 2012-

2035 RTP/SCS Project List

 Project currently exists in the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS Project 

List, but:

o has a revised description,

o has a revised schedule,

o has a change in total cost, or

o includes a combination of the above changes

 Duplicate project removed or project combined with 

another project in the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS Project List

The tables on the following pages provide details of the project 

changes from the current Plan and are intended to illustrate a 

before-and-after scenario for each of the projects. For modeled 

projects, the “Project Completion By” year represents the Plan 

network year for which the project was analyzed for modeling and 

regional emissions analysis purposes. For more specific individual 

project information as part of the RTP/SCS modeling and regional 

emissions analysis, please refer to the modeled projects list updated 

through Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP (Model List) available at 

http://scag.ca.gov. 
4 | P a g e

Modifications to FTIP Projects

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

IMPERIAL 6OM0701 IMP091001 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

0 EXISTING:

WIDEN AND IMPROVE 

CESAR CHAVEZ BLVD. TO 

4 LANES (2+2) FROM 

2ND STREET TO SR 98.

OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 

INCLUDE: SURFACE 

REHAB, TURN LANES, 

TRAFFIC SIGNAL, 

LIGHTING, AND 

SIDEWALKS.

EXISTING:

2014

EXISTING:

$2,850

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

INCREASE.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION, 

SCHEDULE,

AND COST

REVISED:

WIDEN AND IMPROVE 

CESAR CHAVEZ BLVD. TO 

5 LANES (3+2) FROM 

2ND STREET TO SR 98.

OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 

INCLUDE: SURFACE 

REHAB, TURN LANES, 

TRAFFIC SIGNAL, 

LIGHTING, AND 

SIDEWALKS

REVISED:

2015

REVISED:

$8,930

LOS ANGELES LA990359 LA990359 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

0 EXISTING:

GRADE SEP XINGS 

SAFETY IMPR; 35-MI 

FREIGHT RAIL CORR. 

THRGH SAN.GAB. 

VALLEY - EAST. L.A. TO 

POMONA ALONG UPRR 

ALHAMBRA &L.A. 

SUBDIV - ITS 2318 

SAFETEA #2178; 1436 

#1934 PPNO 2318

2018 EXISTING:

$1,347,101

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

DECREASE.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION 

AND COST
5 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED:

GRADE SEP XINGS 

SAFETY IMPR; 35- MI 

FREIGHT RAIL CORR. 

THRGH SAN.GAB. 

VALLEY - EAST. L.A. TO 

POMONA ALONG UPRR 

ALHAMBRA & L.A. 

SUBDIV - ITS 2318 

SAFETEA #2178; 1436 

#1934 PPNO 2318. 

NOGALES (LA) PROJECT

INCLUDES WIDENING 

FROM 2 TRAVEL LANES 

TO 4 TRAVEL LANES OF

E.WALNUT DRIVE NO. 

EAST OF NOGALES FOR 

2600 LINEAR FEET AND

WIDENING FROM 2 

TRAVEL LANES TO 4 

TRAVEL LANES OF GALE

AVE. WEST OF NOGALES

FOR 1900 LINEAR FEET.

REVISED:

$1,286,500
6 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

LOS ANGELES LAE0465 LA0G440 STATE 

HIGHWAY

5 EXISTING:

ROUTE 005: PHASE 2 

AND 3 OF 3-- IN 

LA/SANTA CLARITA: 

PHASE 2 (N/B FR RTE 14 

TO WELDON CNYN 

ROAD; CONSTRUCT HOV 

LANE )& PHASE 3 (FR 

SR14 TO PARKER RD OC; 

CONSTRUCT HOV, 

TRUCK & AUX LANES (EA 

2332C, PPNO 3189A & 

EA 2332E PPNO 3189B), 

SAFTETEA-LU#465. PE & 

RW $ ARE 

PROGRAMMED FOR EA 

2332E ONLY.

EXISTING:

2017

$410,000 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION 

AND 

SCHEDULE

REVISED:

ROUTE 005: PHASE 

2,FROM SR-14 TO 

PARKER ROAD, 

CONSTRUCT HOV/HOT, 

TRUCK & AUX LANES (EA 

2332C, PPNO 3189A & 

EA 2332E PPNO 3189B), 

SAFTETEA-LU#465. PE & 

RW $ ARE 

PROGRAMMED FOR EA 

2332E ONLY.

REVISED:

2018
7 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

LOS ANGELES REG0703 LA0G872 STATE 

HIGHWAY

110 EXISTING:

ROUTE 110: 

NORTHBOUND 

405/SOUTHBOUND 110 

CONNECTOR WIDENING 

OR REPLACEMENT WITH 

A FLYOVER AND 

CONSTRUCT A NEW 

AUXILIARY LANE ON 

SOUTHBOUND 110 

FROM I-405/I-110 

INTERCHANGE TO DEL 

AMO BLVD. (EA 29370 

PPNO 4552) - STUDY 

ONLY.

2014 $1,150 NO 

CHANGE

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION

REVISED:

ROUTE 110: 

NORTHBOUND 

405/SOUTHBOUND 110 

CONNECTOR WIDENING 

OR REPLACEMENT WITH 

A FLYOVER AND 

CONSTRUCT A NEW 

AUXILIARY LANE ON 

SOUTHBOUND 110 

FROM I-91/I-110 

INTERCHANGE TO 

TORRANCE BLVD. (EA 

29370 PPNO 4552)
8 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

LOS ANGELES 7120010 LA000789 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING:

BURBANK-GLENDALEPASADENA AIRPORT 

INTERMODAL GROUND 

ACCESS LINK FEASIBILITY 

STUDY AND CONDUCT 

PE, DESIGN AND 

CONSTRUCTION OF A 

LINK BETWEEN THE 

AIRPORT AND OTHER 

TRANSPORTATION 

SERVICES.

EXISTING:

2015

EXISTING:

$5,484

REVISED 

FTIP 

PROJECT 

COST FALLS 

WITHIN

PARENT 

RTP

7120010

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION, 

SCHEDULE, 

AND FTIP 

PROJECT COST

REVISED:

BURBANK-GLENDALEPASADENA AIRPORT 

INTERMODAL GROUND 

ACCESS LINK FEASIBILITY 

STUDY: CONDUCT PE, 

DESIGN OF A LINK 

BETWEEN THE AIRPORT 

AND OTHER 

TRANSPORTATION 

SERVICES. 

(CONSTRUCTION IN 

LA000789A)

REVISED:

2017

REVISED:

$3,696
9 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

LOS ANGELES 7120010 LA000789A TRANSIT BURBANK-GLENDALEPASADENA AIRPORT 

INTERMODAL GROUND 

ACCESS LINK: 

CONSTRUCTION OF A 

LINK BETWEEN THE 

AIRPORT AND OTHER 

TRANSPORTATION 

SERVICES, INCLUDING 

CONSTRUCTION OF A 

NEW METROLINK 

STATION AT 

HOLLYWOOD WAY/SAN 

FERNANDO ROAD ON 

THE ANTELOPE VALLEY 

LINE AND A LINK 

BETWEEN THE AIRPORT 

AND OTHER 

TRANSPORTATION 

SERVICES. 

(CONSTRUCTION OF 

LA000789)

2018 $1,788 NEW FTIP 

PROJECT 

COST FALLS 

WITHIN 

PARENT 

RTP 

7120010 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

NEW FTIP 

PROJECT

LOS ANGELES 1TL0703 LA0D376 TRANSIT 0 CONSTRUCTION OF 

GRADE SEPARATIONS 

ON 35 MILE FREIGHT 

RAIL CORRIDOR FROM 

LOS ANGELES TO 

POMONA.

2015 $959 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

FTIP PROJECT 

DELETION, 

PROJECT 

COMBINED 

WITH 

LA990359
10 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

LOS ANGELES LA0D29 LA0D29 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING:

HEART OF THE CITY BUS 

TRANSFER STATION 

AMENITIES.

2014 EXISTING:

$9,378

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

INCREASE.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION 

AND COST

REVISED:

HEART OF THE CITY BUS 

TRANSFER STATION 

AMENITIES. RELOCATE

THE EXISTING 

INTERMODAL TRANSIT 

TERMINAL AND 

CONSTRUCT A NEW 

TRANSIT CENTER WITH 

12 BUS BAYS, 

PASSENGER WAITING 

AREA AND 

INFORMATION CENTER, 

AND A DRIVER 

OPERATOR LOUNGE. 

THE PROPERTY WILL 

ALSO PROVIDE 339 

PUBLIC PARKING SPACES 

(PLUS 2 FOR STAFF: 

MAINTENANCE & 

SECURITY) AND BICYCLE 

FACILITIES. LOCATION -

1521 KINGSDALE 

AVENUE, REDONDO 

BEACH, CA 90278

REVISED:

$10,045

LOS ANGELES LA0G901 LA0G901 TRANSIT HISTORIC LOS ANGELES 

STREETCAR

2018 $125,000 NEW RTP 

PROJECT 

COST.

NEW PROJECT
11 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

ORANGE 2A0704 ORA130401 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

WIDEN CERRITOS 

AVENUE EASTBOUND 4 

TO 5 LANES, FROM 

WALKER STREET TO 

ANGELA AVENUE.

2014 $378 NEW FTIP 

PROJECT 

COST FALLS 

WITHIN 

PARENT 

RTP 

2A0704

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

NEW FTIP 

PROJECT

ORANGE 2H0703 ORA111210 STATE 

HIGHWAY

5 EXISTING:

I-5 FROM SR 55 TO SR 57 

- ADD 1 HOV LANE EACH 

DIRECTION; 

RECONSTRUCT THE 

FIRST ST/FOURTH ST IC 

ON SB I-5 TO INCREASE 

WEAVING LENGTH TO 

STANDARD (EXTEND 

MERGE LANES BY 100 

FEET)

2018 EXISTING:

$45,669

REVISED 

FTIP 

PROJECT 

COST FALLS 

WITHIN 

PARENT 

RTP 

2H0703

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION

AND FTIP 

PROJECT COST

REVISED:

I-5 FROM SR 55 TO SR 57 

- ADD 1 HOV LANE EACH 

DIRECTION; 

RECONSTRUCT THE 

FIRST ST/FOURTH ST IC 

ON SB I-5 TO INCREASE 

WEAVING LENGTH TO 

STANDARD

REVISED:

$46,356
12 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

ORANGE 2M0730 ORA111801 STATE 

HIGHWAY

5 EXISTING:

I-5 WIDENING (EL TORO 

TO SR-73) - ADD 2 GP 

LANES FROM AVERY TO 

ALICIA IN BOTH 

DIRECTIONS; EXTEND 

2ND HOV FROM EL 

TORO TO ALICIA IN 

BOTH DIRECTIONS; 

PROVIDE OPERATIONAL 

IMPROVEMENTS; AND 

RECONFIGURE 

INTERCHANGES AT 

AVERY PKWY & LA PAZ. 

CONSISTENT WITH THE 

2012 RTP

2023 $6,000 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION

REVISED:

I-5 WIDENING (EL TORO 

TO SR-73) - ADD 1 GP 

LANES FROM AVERY TO 

ALICIA IN EACH 

DIRECTIONS; EXTEND 

2ND HOV FROM EL 

TORO TO ALICIA IN EACH 

DIRECTIONS; PROVIDE 

OPERATIONAL 

IMPROVEMENTS; AND 

RECONSTRUCT 

INTERCHANGES AT 

AVERY PKWY & LA PAZ 

RD. CONSISTENT WITH

THE 2012 RTP
13 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

ORANGE 2M0733 ORA100511 STATE 

HIGHWAY

55 EXISTING:

SR-55 WIDENING 

BETWEEN I-405 AND I-5 

- ADD 1 MF LANE EACH 

DIRECTION AND FIX 

CHOKEPOINTS FROM I405 TO I-5; ADD 1 AUX 

LANE EA DIR BTWN 

SELECT ON/OFF RAMP 

THROUGH PROJECT 

LIMITS (PS&E AND 

PAED). CONSISTENT 

WITH THE 2012 RTP

EXISTING:

2021

EXISTING:

$297,000

REVISED 

FTIP 

PROJECT 

COST FALLS 

WITHIN 

PARENT 

RTP 

2M0733

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION, 

SCHEDULE, 

AND FTIP 

PROJECT COST

REVISED:

SR-55 WIDENING 

BETWEEN I-405 AND I-5

- ADD 1 MF LANE EACH 

DIRECTION AND FIX 

CHOKEPOINTS FROM I405 TO I-5; ADD 1 AUX 

LANE EA DIR BTWN 

SELECT ON/OFF RAMP 

AND NON-CAPACITY 

OPERATIONAL 

IMPROVEMENTS 

THROUGH PROJECT 

LIMITS (PS&E AND 

PAED). CONSISTENT 

WITH THE 2012 RTP

REVISED:

2020

REVISED:

$274,900
14 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

ORANGE ORA030605 ORA030605 STATE 

HIGHWAY

405 EXISTING:

I-405 FROM SR-73 TO I605. IN EACH DIRECTION 

ADD 1 MF LAND, 

CONVERT EXISTING HOV

TO HOT, ADD 1 

ADDITIONAL HOT LANE,

AND ADDITIONAL 

CAPITAL 

IMPROVEMENTS. 

COMBINED WITH 

ORA045, ORA151 AND 

ORA120310. 

CONSISTENT WITH THE 

2012 RTP

2023 $1,694,000 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION

REVISED:

I-405 FROM SR-73 TO I605 ADD 1 MF LANE 

EACH DIR AND PROVIDE

ADDITIONAL CAPITAL 

IMPROVEMENTS. #317. 

COMBINED WITH 

ORA045, ORA151 AND 

ORA120310 ORA120310.
15 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

ORANGE 2TR0701 ORA080908 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING:

A TRANSIT CORRIDOR 

FOR THE CITY OF 

ANAHEIM - ANAHEIM 

RAPID CONNECTION 

(ARC) FIXED GUIDEWAY

SYSTEM LINKING THE 

ANAHEIM REGIONAL 

TRANSPORTATION 

INTERMODAL CENTER 

(ARTIC) TO THE 

PLATINUM TRIANGLE TO

THE ANAHEIM RESORT. 

ALTERNATIVES 

ANALYSIS, EIR/EIS, LPA 

AND CONCEPTUAL AND 

ADVANCED 

ENGINEERING, PROJECT

DEVELOPMENT 

ACTIVITIES AND 

PRELIMINARY 

ENGINEERING.

EXISTING:

2015

EXISTING:

$18,536

REVISED 

FTIP 

PROJECT 

COST FALLS 

WITHIN 

PARENT 

RTP 

2TR0701

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION, 

SCHEDULE, 

AND FTIP 

PROJECT COST
16 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED:

A TRANSIT CORRIDOR 

FOR THE CITY OF 

ANAHEIM - ANAHEIM 

RAPID CONNECTION 

(ARC) FIXED GUIDEWAY

SYSTEM CONNECTING 

THE ANAHEIM 

REGIONAL 

TRANSPORTATION 

INTERMODAL CENTER 

(ARTIC) THE PLATINUM 

TRIANGLE, AND THE 

ANAHEIM RESORT. 

ALTERNATIVES 

ANALYSIS, EIR/EIS, LPA 

AND CONCEPTUAL AND 

ADVANCED 

ENGINEERING, PROJECT

DEVELOPMENT 

ACTIVITIES AND 

PRELIMINARY 

ENGINEERING.

REVISED:

2020

REVISED:

$319,000

RIVERSIDE 30M0701-

RIV110302

RIV110302 STATE 

HIGHWAY

10 EXISTING:

ON I-10 IN THE CITY OF 

BLYTHE - PROVIDE NEW 

W/B ON AND W/B OFF 

RAMPS TO HOBSON 

WAY APPROX 1,800' 

W/O EXISTING RAMPS 

TO RIVIERA 

DR/INSPECTION 

STATION. THE NEW 

RAMPS WILL REPLACE 

EXISTING CONNECTION 

TO RIVIERA DR.

2015 EXISTING:

$3,635

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

INCREASE.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION 

AND COST
17 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED:

ON I-10 IN THE CITY OF 

BLYTHE - PROVIDE NEW 

W/B ON AND W/B OFF 

RAMPS TO HOBSON 

WAY APPROX 3,500'' 

W/O EXISTING RAMPS 

TO RIVIERA 

DR/INSPECTION 

STATION. THE NEW 

RAMPS WILL REPLACE 

EXISTING CONNECTION 

TO RIVIERA DR.

REVISED:

$3,998

SAN 

BERNARDINO

200018 200018 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

0 EXISTING:

BOULDER AV ACROSS 

CITY CREEK S/O 

BASELINE -

RECONSTRUCT EXISTING

BRIDGE FROM 2 TO 4 

LANES; ALSO WIDEN 

BOULDER AVE FROM 

190 FT NORTH TO 1,430 

FT SOUTH OF BRIDGE 

FROM 2-4 LANES 

(54C0648)(TOLL CREDITS 

$600 FOR FY12/13 CON)

EXISTING:

2012

EXISTING:

$21,898

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

DECREASE.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION, 

SCHEDULE, 

AND COST
18 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED:

BOULDER AV ACROSS 

CITY CREEK S/O 

BASELINE -

RECONSTRUCT EXISTING

BRIDGE FROM 2 TO 4 

LANES; ALSO WIDEN 

BOULDER AVE FROM 

190' NORTH TO 1,430'

SOUTH OF BRIDGE 

FROM 2-4 LANES 

(54C0648)

REVISED:

2014

REVISED:

$16,765

SAN 

BERNARDINO

20130403 20130403 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

0 IN RIALTO, CONSTRUCT

PEPPER AVE - 4 LANES 

FROM NORTHERN 

TERMINUS TO APPROX 

1,300 FT S/O HIGHLAND 

AVE AND 2 LANES FROM

APPROX 1,300 FT S/O 

HIGHLAND AVE TO 

HIGHLAND AVE

2014 $15,000 NEW RTP 

PROJECT 

COST.

NEW PROJECT
19 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

SAN 

BERNARDINO

20084104 20084104 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

0 EXISTING:

JOSHUA STREET PARK &

RIDE EXPANSION - ON 

JOSHUA STREET WEST 

OF US 395,C ITY OF 

HESPERIA, EXISTING PNR 

HAS 188 SPACES AND 

NEEDS TO ADD 150 

SPACES, TO INCLUDE 

LANDSCAPING, 

LIGHTING AND VARIOUS

NON-CAPACITY STREET 

IMPROVEMENTS TO 

FACILITATE ADDITIONAL 

SPACES (TOLL CREDITS

TO BE USED IN ENG & 

CON PHASES.CMAQ 

ADDED $5 IN 10/11 AND 

$67 2011/12 )

EXISTING:

2012

EXISTING:

$638

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

INCREASE.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION, 

SCHEDULE, 

AND COST

REVISED:

JOSHUA STREET PARK & 

RIDE EXPANSION - ON 

JOSHUA STREET WEST 

OF US 395,C ITY OF 

HESPERIA, EXISTING PNR 

HAS 188 SPACES AND 

NEEDS TO ADD 200 

SPACES, TO INCLUDE 

LANDSCAPING, 

LIGHTING AND VARIOUS

NON-CAPACITY STREET 

IMPROVEMENTS TO 

FACILITATE ADDITIONAL 

SPACES

REVISED:

2014

REVISED:

$743
20 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

SAN 

BERNARDINO

200622 200622 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

0 LENWOOD GRADE 

SEPARATION - NORTH 

OF WEST MAIN ST; 

APPROX.400 FT. N/O TO 

600 FT. S/O BNSF AND

SANTA FE RR RIGHT-OFWAY-4 TRAVEL LANE 

GRADE SEPARATION 

(CA627)

EXISTING:

2014

$31,732 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

SCHEDULE

REVISED:

2015

SAN 

BERNARDINO

20130401 20130401 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

0 ON ORANGE ST. FROM 

2,000 FT. S/O 

GREENSPOT RD. TO 

7,800 FT. N/O PIONEER 

AVE-BRIDGE 

REPLACEMENT 2 LANE 

TO 4 LANE BRIDGE

2018 $4,630 NEW RTP 

PROJECT 

COST.

NEW PROJECT

SAN 

BERNARDINO

20130402 20130402 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

0 RESTRIPE EXISTING 

STRUCTURAL SECTION 

OF BAKER BLVD 

BETWEEN I-15 RAMPS 

AND SH 127 FROM 2 - 4 

LANE CONFIGURATION 

IN CONJUNCTION WITH 

PROJECT TO REPLACE 

EXISTING 2 LANE BRIDGE 

54CO127 WITH 4 LANE 

BRIDGE

2015 $25 NEW RTP 

PROJECT 

COST.

NEW PROJECT
21 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

SAN 

BERNARDINO

200064 200064 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

0 EXISTING:

WASHINGTON ST FROM 

RECHE CANYON TO 

HUNTS LN - ELIMINATE 

BOTTLENECK ADD NB 

TURN POCKET; WIDEN 2-

4 LNS ON WASHINGTON 

FROM RECHE CYN. TO 

HUNTS LN. USING 

EXISTING WIDTH; 

MODIFY SIGNALS

EXISTING:

2012

$570 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION 

REVISED:

WASHINGTON ST FROM 

RECHE CANYON TO 

HUNTS LN - ELIMINATE 

BOTTLENECK BY 

ADDING NB TURN 

POCKET AT RECHE 

CANYON RD. (EXCLUSIVE 

LEFT AND RIGHT) 

THROUGH RESTRIPING 

AND WIDENING WITHIN 

R/W; MODIFY TRAFFIC 

SIGNALS

REVISED:

2014

SAN 

BERNARDINO

44810-

44812

44812 STATE 

HIGHWAY

10 EXISTING:

I-10 TIPPECANOE 

RECONFIGURE 

INTERCHANGE & LOCAL 

RD IMP/MOD (HP 

1366)(FORMERLY PART 

OF RTP ID 

44810)(WESTBOUND)(N

ON-CAPACITY LOCAL 

ROAD IMPROVEMENTS -

NO THRU LANES)

EXISTING:

2014

EXISTING:

$57,070

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

INCREASE.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION, 

SCHEDULE, 

AND COST
22 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED:

I-10 TIPPECANOE 

RECONFIGURE 

INTERCHANGE & LOCAL 

RD IMP/MOD (HP 

1366)(WESTBOUND -

PHASE II)(FORMERLY 

PART OF RTP ID 44810)

REVISED:

2015

REVISED:

$61,863

SAN 

BERNARDINO

200048 200048 STATE 

HIGHWAY

15 EXISTING:

I-15 AT BASELINE 

INTERCHANGE - FROM 

1,800 N/O BASELINE TO 

2,400' S/O; 1800' W/O 

TO EAST AVE. TO 1500' 

E/O EAST AVE-WIDEN 

RAMPS (INCLUDING 

BRIDGES), WIDEN 

BASELINE RD. FROM 4-6 

LANES, WIDEN EAST 

AVE. FROM 2-4 LANES, 

REALIGN AND WIDEN 

S/B AND N/B DIAMOND 

RAMPS FROM 1-2 LNS 

(INCLUDG BRIDGES, AD

S.B LOOP ON-RAMP 

(INCL BRIDGES) ADD I-15 

ACCEL/DECEL LANES, 

AND OPERATIONAL 

IMPROVEME

EXISTING:

2014

EXISTING:

$43,100

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

INCREASE.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION, 

SCHEDULE, 

AND COST
23 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED:

I-15 AT BASELINE 

INTERCHANGE - FROM 

1,800 N/O BASELINE TO 

2,400FT S/O; 1800FT 

W/O TO EAST AVE. TO 

1500FT E/O EAST AVEWIDEN RAMPS 

(INCLUDING BRIDGES),

WIDEN BASELINE RD. 

FROM 4-6 LNS, WIDEN 

EAST AVE. FROM 2-4 

LNS, REALIGN AND 

WIDEN S/B AND N/B 

DIAMOND RAMPS FROM 

1-2 LNS (INCLUDG 

BRIDGES, AD S.B LOOP

ON-RAMP (INCL 

BRIDGES) ADD I-15 

ACCEL/DECEL LNS, AND

OPERATIONAL 

IMPRVMNTS 

(EA497100)(CA435)

REVISED:

2015

REVISED:

$53,378
24 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

SAN 

BERNARDINO

20061201 20061201 STATE 

HIGHWAY

15 EXISTING:

I-15/I-215 I/C 

IMPRVMTS-DEVORE I/C 

S/O GLEN HELEN PKWY 

TO N/O KENWOOD & 

ON I-215 FROM S/O 

DEVORE RD. I/C TO I-15 

(16.0-17.8) ADD 1 M/F 

LN IN EA DIR TO EXISTG 

3 M/F LNS FROM 3800 

FT S/O GLEN HELEN 

PKWY TO 3100 FT N/O I215 I/C, CONSTRUCT 

TRUCK BYPASS LNS S/O

I-15/215 I/C TO N/O 

KENWOOD I/C 

RECONFIG OF I-15/215 

I/C DEVORE RD. I/C &

KENWOOD I/C 

RECONNECT OF CAJON 

BTWN DEVORE RD & 

KENWOOD(TLL CRDTS)

2018 EXISTING:

$324,246

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

DECREASE.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION 

AND COST
25 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED:

I-15/I-215 I/C 

IMPROVMTS-DEVORE 

I/C S/O GLEN HELEN 

PARKWY TO N/O 

KENWOOD & I-215 

FROM S/O DEVORE RD. 

I/C TO I-15 (16.0-17.8) 

ADD 1 M/F LN IN EA DIR 

TO EXISTG 3 M/F LNS 

FROM 3800 FT S/O GLEN 

HELEN PARKWY TO 3100

FT N/O I-215 I/C ADD 1 

DECEL LN FROM 3200 FT 

S/O I-15/215 I/C 

OFFRMP TO S/B DEVORE

ON I-215, CONSTRUCT 

TRUCK BYPASS LNS.

REVISED:

$323,865

SAN 

BERNARDINO

4M1007 20110110 STATE 

HIGHWAY

210 EXISTING:

CONSTRUCT NEW FULLSERVICE INTERCHANGE 

WITH DIAMOND 

CONFIGURATION AT SR210 AND PEPPER 

AVENUE IN THE CITY OF 

RIALTO. ADD WB AND 

EB ACCEL AND DECEL 

LANES AND LOCAL 

STREET IMPROVEMENTS 

(CONSTRUCT 4 LANES 

ON PEPPER AVE FROM 

HIGHLAND AVE TO 160 

FT SOUTH OF SR-210).

2015 $18,965 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION
26 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED:

CONSTRUCT NEW FULLSERVICE INTERCHANGE 

WITH DIAMOND 

CONFIGURATION AT SR210 AND PEPPER 

AVENUE IN THE CITY OF 

RIALTO. ADD WB AND 

EB ACCEL AND DECEL 

LANES AND WIDEN 

PEPPER FROM 2-4 LANES 

FROM HIGHLAND AVE. 

TO EXISTING 4 LANE 

SECTION S/O 

INTERCHANGE

SAN 

BERNARDINO

4M01005 20111625 STATE 

HIGHWAY

210 EXISTING:

SR210 LANE ADDITION -

ADD 1 MIXED FLOW 

LANE IN EACH 

DIRECTION FROM 

HIGHLAND AVE(S/B). TO 

I-10 (REDLANDS) 

INCLUDES AUX. LANES 

BETWEEN HIGHLAND 

AND 5TH STS AND AN 

ACCELERATION LANE AT 

5TH ST. S/B ON RAMP

2020 $143,939 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION
27 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED:

SR210 LANE ADDITION -

ADD 1 MIXED FLOW 

LANE IN EACH 

DIRECTION FROM 

HIGHLAND AVE(S/B). TO 

LUGONIA (REDLANDS) 

INCLUDES AUX. LANES 

BETWEEN BASE LINE 

AND 5TH STS AND AN 

ACCELERATION LANE AT 

5TH ST. S/B ON RAMP

SAN 

BERNARDINO

4M01043 OM630 STATE

HIGHWAY

215 EXISTING:

I-215 MT. 

VERNON/WASHINGTON 

ST. INTERCHANGERECONSTRUCT I/C-

(PROJECT IS IN REPLACE 

O/C STRUCTURE; 

RECONFIGURE ON/OFF 

RAMPS; ADD SB ACCEL 

AND NB DECEL LANEIMPROVEMENTS TO 

LOCAL STREETS (PA & ED 

ONLY)

EXISTING:

2018

EXISTING:

$85,000

REVISED 

FTIP 

PROJECT 

COST FALLS 

WITHIN 

PARENT 

RTP 

4M01043

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION, 

SCHEDULE, 

AND FTIP 

COST
28 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED:

I-215 MT. 

VERNON/WASHINGTON 

ST. INTERCHANGERECONSTRUCT I/CREPLACE O/C 

STRUCTURE; 

RECONFIGURE ON/OFF 

RAMPS; ADD SB ACCEL 

AND NB DECEL LANEIMPROVEMENTS TO 

LOCAL STREETS

REVISED:

2020

REVISED:

$71,500

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

SAN 

BERNARDINO

4TR0101 20061012 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING:

DOWNTOWN S.B. 

PASSENGER RAIL –

FROM SAN BERNARDINO 

METROLINK STATION TO

APPROX. 1 MILE EAST TO 

A NEW METROLINK 

STATION AT RIALTO AVE 

AND E ST. IN 

DOWNTOWN SAN 

BERNARDINO

EXISTING:

2014

EXISTING:

$66,021

REVISED 

FTIP 

PROJECT 

COST FALLS 

WITHIN 

PARENT 

RTP 

4TR0101

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION, 

SCHEDULE, 

AND FTIP 

COST

REVISED:

DOWNTOWN S.B. 

PASSENGER RAIL –

FROM SAN BERNARDINO 

METROLINK STATION TO

APPROX. 1 MILE EAST TO 

A NEW TRANSIT 

STATION AT RIALTO AVE 

AND E ST. IN 

DOWNTOWN SAN 

BERNARDINO

REVISED:

2015

REVISED:

$83,713
29 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID FTIP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

VENTURA 5AL07 VEN121201 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

MADERA RD IN SIMI 

VALLEY. WIDEN 

EASTSIDE FROM SIMI 

VILLAGE DR TO LOS 

ANGELES AVE TO ADD 

THIRD LANE AND RIGHTTURN LANE.

2014 $600 NEW FTIP 

PROJECT 

COST FALLS 

WITHIN 

PARENT 

RTP 5AL07

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

NEW FTIP 

PROJECT

* For modeled projects, represents the Plan network year for which the project was analyzed for modeling and regional emissions analysis
30 | P a g e

Modifications to RTP Projects

COUNTY RTP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION 

BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

IMPERIAL 6120011 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

0 CESAR CHAVEZ FROM 2ND

STREET TO SR-98: WIDEN AND

IMPROVE

2018 $13,196 DUPLICATE 

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

REMOVED.

REMOVED 

DUPLICATE 

PROJECT

IMPERIAL 6120002 STATE 

HIGHWAY

I-8 RECONSTRUCT I-8 

INTERCHANGE AT IMPERIAL 

AVE.: FROM A TWO-LANE TO A 

FOUR-LANE DIAMOND TYPE 

OVERCROSSING, REALIGN AND 

RECONSTRUCT ON AND OFFRAMPS, AND PROVIDE ACCESS 

TO IMPERIAL AVE. SOUTH OF I8.

2020 $39,635 DUPLICATE 

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

REMOVED.

REMOVED 

DUPLICATE 

PROJECT

ORANGE 2121001 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

0 NEW RAIL GRADE SEPARATION 

ON LOSSAN CORRIDOR AT 

STATE COLLEGE BLVD

(ANAHEIM)

2015 $92,000 NEW RTP 

PROJECT 

COST.

NEW PROJECT 

(PREVIOUSLY IN 

2012-2035 

RTP/SCS 

STRATEGIC 

PLAN)
31 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION 

BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

ORANGE 2A0704 LOCAL 

HIGHWAY

REGIONAL 

CAPACITY 

PROGRAM

COMPLETE MPAH, IMPROVE 

ARTERIAL CAPACITY.

2035 $1,984,650 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

MODELING 

DETAILS 

INCLUDING THE 

REMOVAL OF 

THE 19TH

STREET 

ADDITION 

FROM BALBOA 

TO BANNING; 

AND A 

COMPLETION 

DATE OF 2016 

FOR THE 

BROOKHURST 

STREET 

SEGMENT 

600’NORTH OF 

THE I-5 TO SR91

ORANGE 2H0703 STATE 

HIGHWAY

I-5 EXISTING:

ADD 1 HOV LANE EACH 

DIRECTION; RECONSTRUCT THE 

FIRST ST/FOURTH ST IC ON SB 

I-5 TO INCREASE WEAVING 

LENGTH TO STANDARD; 

EXTEND MERGE LANES BY 100 

FEET

2018 $46,400 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION

REVISED:

ADD 1 HOV LANE EACH 

DIRECTION; RECONSTRUCT THE 

FIRST ST/FOURTH ST IC ON SB 

I-5 TO INCREASE WEAVING 

LENGTH TO STANDARD
32 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION 

BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

ORANGE 2M0730 STATE 

HIGHWAY

I-5 EXISTING:

ADD 2 GP LANES FROM AVERY 

TO ALICIA IN BOTH 

DIRECTIONS; EXTEND 2ND HOV 

FROM EL TORO TO ALICIA IN 

BOTH DIRECTIONS; PROVIDE

OPERATIONAL 

IMPROVEMENTS; AND 

RECONFIGURE INTERCHANGES 

AT AVERY PKWY & LA PAZ

2023 $558,700 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION

REVISED:

ADD 1 GP LANE FROM AVERY 

TO ALICIA IN EACH 

DIRECTION; EXTEND 2ND HOV 

FROM EL TORO TO ALICIA IN 

EACH DIRECTION; PROVIDE 

OPERATIONAL 

IMPROVEMENTS; AND 

RECONSTRUCT INTERCHANGES 

AT AVERY PKWY & LA PAZ RD.

ORANGE ORA030605 STATE 

HIGHWAY

I-405 EXISTING:

I-405 FROM SR-73 TO I-605. IN 

EACH DIRECTION, ADD 1 MF 

LANE, CONVERT EXISTING HOV 

TO HOT, ADD 1 ADDITIONAL 

HOT LANE, AND ADDITIONAL 

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS

EXISTING:

2023

EXISTING:

$1,694

NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

(COST 

REVISION 

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION, 

SCHEDULE, AND 

COST (COST 

REVISION 

CORRECTS 

TYPOGRA-
33 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION 

BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED:

ADD 1 MF LANE IN EACH 

DIRECTION, AND ADDITIONAL 

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS (BY 

2022); CONVERT EXISTING HOV 

TO HOT, ADD 1 ADDITIONAL 

HOT LANE EACH DIRECTION (BY 

2035)

REVISED:

2035

REVISED:

$1,694,000

CORRECTS 

TYPOGRAPHICAL 

ERROR; 

ORIGINAL 

RTP/SCS 

FISCAL 

IMPACT 

ANALYSIS 

BASED ON 

CORRECT 

COST). NO 

FISCAL

IMPACT.

PHICAL ERROR)

ORANGE EXISTING:

2M0733

STATE 

HIGHWAY

SR-55 EXISTING:

ADD 1 MF LANE EACH 

DIRECTION AND FIX 

CHOKEPOINTS FROM I-405 TO 

SR-22; ADD 1 AUX LANE EA DIR 

BTWN SELECT ON/OFF RAMP 

AND OPERATIONAL 

IMPROVEMENTS THROUGH 

PROJECT LIMITS

EXISTING:

2023

EXISTING:

$343,055

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

INCREASE.

PROJECT SPLIT, 

REVISED 

SCHEDULE AND 

COST

REVISED

(1 OF 2):

2M0733

REVISED (1 OF 2):

ADD 1 MF LANE EACH 

DIRECTION AND FIX 

CHOKEPOINTS FROM I-405 TO 

I-5; ADD 1 AUX LANE EA DIR 

BTWN SELECT ON/OFF RAMPS 

AND OPERATIONAL 

IMPROVEMENTS THROUGH

PROJECT LIMITS

REVISED

(1 OF 2):

2020

REVISED

(1 OF 2):

$274,900
34 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION 

BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED

(2 OF 2):

2121002

REVISED (2 OF 2):

I-5 TO SR-91: ADD CAPACITY 

AND FIX CHOKEPOINTS FROM 

I-5 TO SR-22; AND OTHER 

OPERATIONAL 

IMPROVEMENTS 

THROUGHOUT PROJECT LIMITS

REVISED

(2 OF 2):

2023

REVISED

(2 OF 2):

$148,490

ORANGE 2TR0701 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING:

ANAHEIM RAPID CONNECTION: 

ELEVATED FIXED-GUIDEWAY 

SYSTEM CONNECTING THE 

ANAHEIM REGIONAL 

TRANSPORTATION 

INTERMODAL CENTER, THE 

PLATINUM TRIANGLE, AND THE 

ANAHEIM RESORT

2020 EXISTING:

$676,000

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

DECREASE.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION 

AND COST

REVISED:

ANAHEIM RAPID CONNECTION: 

FIXED-GUIDEWAY SYSTEM 

CONNECTING THE ANAHEIM 

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION 

INTERMODAL CENTER, THE 

PLATINUM TRIANGLE, AND THE 

ANAHEIM RESORT

REVISED:

$319,000

ORANGE 2TR1001 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING:

SANTA ANA AND GARDEN

GROVE FIXED GUIDEWAY

BETWEEN SARTC AND A NEW 

TRANSIT CENTER IN GARDEN 

GROVE, NEAR THE 

INTERSECTION OF HARBOR 

BOULEVARD AND 

WESTMINSTER AVENUE.

2018 EXISTING:

$252,000

RTP 

PROJECT 

COST 

DECREASE.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION 

AND COST
35 | P a g e

COUNTY RTP ID CATEGORY ROUTE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT 

COMPLETION 

BY*

PROJECT 

COST

($1,000’S)

FISCAL 

IMPACT

REASON FOR 

AMENDMENT

REVISED:

SANTA ANA AND GARDEN

GROVE FIXED GUIDEWAY

BETWEEN SARTC AND A NEW 

TRANSIT CENTER IN GARDEN 

GROVE, NEAR THE 

INTERSECTION OF HARBOR 

BOULEVARD AND 

WESTMINSTER AVENUE.

SEGMENT 1: SARTC TO BRISTOL

SEGMENT 2: BRISTOL TO 

HARBOR

REVISED:

$225,000

SAN 

BERNARDINO

4120194 TRANSIT 0 ADD A SECOND 

TRACK/ADDITIONAL PASSING 

TRACK THROUGHOUT THE

CORRIDOR OF PHASE 1 

PROJECT

EXISTING:

2020

$183,490 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

SCHEDULE

REVISED:

2023

SAN 

BERNARDINO

4TR0101 TRANSIT 0 EXISTING:

EXTEND RAIL SERVICE TO 

REDLANDS (9 MILES); 

COMMUTER RAIL 

TECHNOLOGY

EXISTING:

2015

$148,879 NO 

CHANGE 

TO RTP 

PROJECT 

COST. NO 

FISCAL 

IMPACT.

REVISED 

DESCRIPTION 

AND SCHEDULE

REVISED:

EXTEND METROLINK RAIL 

SERVICE FROM RIALTO/E ST IN 

SAN BERNARDINO TO 

REDLANDS (9 MILES)

REVISED:

2018

* For modeled projects, represents the Plan network year for which the project was analyzed for modeling and regional emissions analysis
36 | P a g e

Fiscal Impact

This Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS includes changes 

to existing projects, addition of new projects, and removal of 

duplicate projects. Individual project changes are addressed in the 

Modifications to Projects sections of this document (pp. 4-35).

In terms of overall impact on the RTP/SCS Financial Plan, there was 

a net cost decrease of $137 million to the 2012‒2035 RTP/SCS 

Financial Plan from the Modifications to Projects. A summary of 

these changes are broken down by county in the below table (see 

first three rows in table below).

Any net cost increases to the RTP/SCS Financial Plan are being 

funded by the identified sources broken down by county (see table 

below) which are in addition to 2012‒2035 RTP/SCS forecasted 

revenues.

Based on review of the funding considerations for each project 

documented herein, SCAG finds that this Amendment No. 1 to the 

2012-2035 RTP/SCS does not adversely impact the financial 

constraint of the 2012‒2035 RTP/SCS. The RTP/SCS remains 

financially constrained.

Fiscal Impact Summary

(Amounts in $1,000’s)

IMPERIAL

COUNTY

LOS ANGELES

COUNTY

ORANGE

COUNTY

RIVERSIDE

COUNTY

SAN 

BERNARDINO

COUNTY

VENTURA

COUNTY

SCAG

REGION

Cost increases: changes to existing 

and new projects $6,080 $126,817 $240,490 $363 $21,099 $0 $394,849

Cost decreases: changes to existing 

projects and deleted projects ($13,196) ($60,601) ($452,155) $0 ($5,541) $0 ($531,493)

Net cost increase (decrease) ($7,116) $66,216 ($211,665) $363 $15,558 $0 ($136,644)

Additional funding sources:

County sales tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,630 $0 $4,630

Other local funds $0 $65,257 $0 $363 $10,928 $0 $76,548

Total sources $0 $65,257 $0 $363 $15,558 $0 $81,178
37 | P a g e

Senate Bill 375 and the Sustainable Communities Strategy

Upon the adoption of the RTP/SCS in April 2012, SCAG determined 

that the plan met and exceeded all of the requirements for a 

Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) as set forth in SB 375. A 

description of the SCS and how the requirements are addressed is 

included in the adopted Plan as Chapter 4. At the time of adoption, 

SCAG concluded that State-established greenhouse gas emission 

reduction targets had been met and exceeded, and the California 

Air Resources Board reviewed and approved this conclusion in July 

2012. This Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS makes 

certain changes to transportation projects. Staff has reviewed such 

changes relative to the adopted plan and the requirements of SB 

375, and has determined that the RTP/SCS, as amended by 

Amendment No. 1 remains compliant with SB 375 and continues to 

meet and exceed the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets

established for the SCAG region.
38 | P a g e

Transportation Conformity

Transportation conformity is required under the Federal Clean Air Act to 

ensure that federally supported highway and transit project activities 

conform to the purpose of the State Implementation Plan (SIP). 

Conformity to the purpose of the SIP means that transportation activities 

will not cause new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or 

delay timely attainment of the relevant National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards. Conformity applies to non-attainment and maintenance areas 

for the following transportation-related criteria pollutants: ozone, 

particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), carbon monoxide (CO), and 

nitrogen dioxide (NO2).

Under the U.S. DOT metropolitan planning regulations and EPA’s 

transportation conformity regulations, Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-

2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy 

(RTP/SCS) and Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 Federal Transportation 

Improvement Program (FTIP) need to pass five tests: consistency with 

the adopted 2012-2035 RTP/SCS, regional emissions analysis, timely 

implementation of transportation control measures (TCMs), financial 

constraint, and interagency consultation and public involvement.

The findings of the conformity determination for Amendment No. 1 to 

the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP are 

presented below. Details of the regional emissions analysis follow the 

findings.

Conformity Findings

SCAG’s findings for the approval of Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP are as follows:

 Consistency with 2012-2035 RTP/SCS Test 

Inclusion of the amended projects in the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

2013 FTIP would not change any other policies, programs or 

projects in the federally approved 2012-2035 RTP/SCS.

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP are consistent with 

the federally approved 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and meet all 

federal and state requirements and regulations.

 Regional Emissions Tests

o Finding: The regional emissions analyses for Amendment 

No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13-04 

to the 2013 FTIP update the regional emissions analyses for 

the federally approved 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 2013 FTIP.

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions 

analysis for PM2.5 and its precursors meet all applicable 

emission budget tests for all milestone, attainment, and 

planning horizon years in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB).

o Finding: For the 1997 ozone national ambient air quality 

standards, Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions 

for ozone precursors meet all applicable emission budget 

tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon 

years for the SCAB, South Central Coast Air Basin ([SCCAB], 

Ventura County portion), Western Mojave Desert Air Basin 

([MDAB], Los Angeles County Antelope Valley portion and 

San Bernardino County western portion of MDAB), and the 

Salton Sea Air Basin ([SSAB], Riverside County Coachella 

Valley and Imperial County portions).

o Finding: For the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality 

standards, Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions 

for ozone precursors meet all applicable emission budget 

tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon 

years for the Morongo Band of Mission Indians (Morongo), 

Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga 

Reservation (Pechanga), SCAB excluding Morongo and 
39 | P a g e

Pechanga, South Central Coast Air Basin ([SCCAB], Ventura 

County portion), Western Mojave Desert Air Basin ([MDAB], 

Los Angeles County Antelope Valley portion and San 

Bernardino County western portion of MDAB), and the 

Salton Sea Air Basin ([SSAB], Riverside County Coachella 

Valley and Imperial County portions).

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions 

for NO2 meet all applicable emission budget tests for all 

milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years in the 

SCAB.

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions 

for CO meet all applicable emission budget tests for all 

milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years in SCAB.

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions 

for PM10 and its precursors meet all applicable emission 

budget tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning 

horizon years in SCAB and the SSAB (Riverside County 

Coachella Valley portion).

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions 

for PM10 meet the interim emission test (build/no-build 

test) for all milestone, attainment and planning horizon 

years for the MDAB (San Bernardino County portion 

excluding Searles Valley portion) and Searles Valley portion 

of San Bernardino County) and for the SSAB (Imperial 

County portion).

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP regional emissions 

analysis for PM2.5 and its precursors meet the interim 

emission test (build/no-build test) for all milestone, 

attainment and planning horizon years for the SSAB 

(urbanized area of Imperial County portion).

 Timely Implementation of TCMs Test

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP does not revise or 

otherwise alter the scope, schedule, funding priority, or 

implementation of any TCM.

 Financial Constraint Test

o Finding: All projects listed in Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-

2035 RTP/SCS and Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP

are financially constrained for all fiscal years. Fiscal 

constraint is analyzed in the Fiscal Impact chapter of this 

report.

 Interagency Consultation and Public Involvement Test

o Finding: Amendment No. 1 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS and 

Amendment No. 13-04 to the 2013 FTIP comply with all 

federal requirements for interagency consultation and 

public involvement. The amendments were discussed at the 

Transportation Conformity Working Group (TCWG), which 

includes representatives from the federal, state, and local 

air quality and transportation agencies, on six occasions 

(September 25, October 23, November 27, 2012; January 

22, February 26, and March 26, 2013). The draft conformity 

analysis was released for a 30-day public review concluding 

May 9, 2013, and a public hearing was held on April 17, 

2013. No conformity-specific comment was received.

Regional Emissions Analysis

The following tables summarize the required regional emission analyses 

for each of the non-attainment and maintenance areas within SCAG’s 

jurisdiction. For those areas which require budget tests, the emissions 

values in the tables below utilize the rounding convention used by 

California Air Resources Board to set the budgets (i.e., any fraction 

rounded up to the nearest ton), and are the basis of the conformity 

findings for these areas. For paved road dust (PM2.5 and PM10), SCAG 

uses the approved South Coast AQMD methodology, which uses EPA’s 

AP-42 for the updated Base Year and a combination of additional growth 

in center-line miles and VMT for future years.
40 | P a g e

South Central Coast Air Basin – Ventura County Portion

Table 1. 1997 And 2008 8-Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2021 2030 2035

ROG

Budget 13 13 13 13

Plan 9 7 5 5

Budget – Plan 4 6 8 8

NOx

Budget 19 19 19 19

Plan 14 9 6 6

Budget – Plan 5 10 13 13

South Coast Air Basin

Table 2. 1997 8-Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2017 2020 2023 2030 2035

ROG

Budget 136 119 108 99 99 99

Plan 128 112a100 91 76 68

Budget – Plan 8 7 8 8 23 31

NOx

Budget 277 224 185 140 140 140

Plan 262 210a164 126 109 103

Budget – Plan 15 14 21 14 31 37

a

2017 interpolated between 2014 and 2018
41 | P a g e

Table 3. 2008 8-Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant Nonattainment Area 2014 2017 2018 2020 2021 2023 2032 2035

ROG

Budget SCAB 136 119 119 108 108 99 99 99

Plan

Morongo 0.4 0.4a0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

Pechanga 0.0 0.0a0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

SCAB excluding Morongo 

and Pechanga 141.5 123.8

a

117.9 108.4 104.8 97.6 78.4 73.5

Adjustments provided by 

ARB -14.8 -12.4 -11.3 -9.6 -8.7 -7.7 -5.9 -5.7

Sum 127.1 111.8 107.0 99.1 96.4 90.2 72.7 68.0

SCAB 128 112 107 100 97 91 73 68

Budget – Plan 8 7 12 8 11 8 26 31

NOx

Budget SCAB 277 224 224 185 185 140 140 140

Plan

Morongo 1.8 1.5a1.4 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8

Pechanga 0.0 0.0a0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

SCAB excluding Morongo 

and Pechanga 283.2 228.1 209.7 177.8 168.4 156.7 122.3 116.8

Adjustments provided by 

ARB -23.7 -19.8 -16.7 -15.7 -20.0 -32.0 -16.8 -15.0

Sum 261.4 209.8 194.4 163.1 149.5 125.7 106.4 102.6

SCAB 262 210 195 164 150 126 107 103

Budget – Plan 15 14 29 21 35 14 33 37

a

2017 interpolated between 2014 and 2018

Table 4. PM2.5 (24-Hour Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

ROG

Budget 132 132 132 132

Plan 124 105 73 66

Budget – Plan 8 27 59 66

NOx

Budget 290 290 290 290

Plan 275 183 114 108

Budget – Plan 15 107 176 182

PM2.5

Budget 35 35 35 35

Plan 21 12 5 5

Budget – Plan 14 23 30 30
42 | P a g e

Table 5. PM10 (24-Hour Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

ROG

Budget 251 251 251 251

Plana

124 96 73 66

Budget – Plan 127 155 178 185

NOx

Budget 549 549 549 549

Plana

275 167 114 108

Budget – Plan 274 382 435 441

PM10

Budget 166 166 166 166

Planb

79 79 85 87

Budget – Plan 87 87 81 79

a Including baseline adjustments provided by ARB.

b Excluding AQMD Backstop Measure.

On March 22, 2013, EPA Regional Administrator, Jared Blumenfeld, signed a proposed rule approving the South Coast PM10 

maintenance plan and the associated motor vehicle emissions budgets. Table 6 below is for information purposes only since the 

proposed new budgets have not been finalized by EPA. If the new PM10 budgets are approved by EPA as propos ed, Table 6 will 

supersede Table 5 above.

Table 6. PM10 (24-Hour Emissions [Tons/Day]) with New PM10 Budgets Proposed by EPA in April 2013 (pending EPA approval)

Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

ROG

Budget 182 110 81 81

Plana

124 96 73 66

Budget – Plan 58 14 8 15

NOx

Budget 372 180 116 116

Plana

275 167 114 108

Budget – Plan 97 13 2 8

PM10

Budget 159 164 175 175

Planb

79 79 85 87

Budget – Plan 80 85 90 88

a Including baseline adjustments provided by ARB.

b Excluding AQMD Backstop Measure.
43 | P a g e

Table 7. CO (Winter Emissions [tons/day])

Pollutant 2015 2020 2030 2035

CO

Budget 2,137 2,137 2,137 2,137

Plan 1,208 871 593 522

Budget – Plan 929 1,266 1,544 1,615

Table 8. NO2 (Winter Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

NO2

Budget 680 680 680 680

Plan 311 194 136 125

Budget – Plan 369 486 544 555
44 | P a g e

Western Mojave Desert Air Basin – Los Angeles County (Antelope Valley Portion) and San Bernardino County 

(Western Portion of MDAB)

Table 9. 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2020 2027 2035

ROG

Budget 22 22 22 22

Plan 13 10 9 8

Budget – Plan 9 12 13 14

NOx

Budget 77 77 77 77

Plan 34 24 21 22

Budget – Plan 43 53 56 55

Mojave Desert Air Basin – San Bernardino County Portion Excluding Searles Valley

Table 10. PM10 (24-Hour Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

PM10

No Build 9.8 10.1 11.8 12.8

Build 9.1 9.6 11.3 12.1

No Build – Build 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.7

Mojave Desert Air Basin – Searles Valley portion of San Bernardino County

Table 11. PM10 (24-Hour Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

PM10

No Build 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Build 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

No Build – Build 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Salton Sea Air Basin – Riverside County Coachella Valley Portion

Table 12. 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2020 2027 2035

ROG

Budget 7 7 7 7

Plan 6 6 4 4

Budget – Plan 1 1 3 3

NOx

Budget 26 26 26 26

Plan 19 12 11 11

Budget – Plan 7 14 15 15
45 | P a g e

Table 13. PM10 (24-Hour Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

PM10

Budgeta10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9

Plan 8.0 7.6 7.8 8.0

Budget – Plan 2.9 3.3 3.1 2.9

a

Budget set to one decimal place by 2003 Coachella SIP.

Salton Sea Air Basin – Imperial County Portion

Table 14. 1997 and 2008 Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2015 2020 2030 2035

ROG

Budget 7 7 7 7

Plan 5 4 4 4

Budget – Plan 2 3 3 3

NOx

Budget 17 17 17 17

Plan 12 9 9 10

Budget – Plan 5 8 8 7

Table 15. PM2.5 (24-Hour Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

PM2.5

No Build 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8

Build 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8

No Build – Build 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0

Table 16. PM10 (24-HOUR Emissions [Tons/Day])

Pollutant 2014 2020 2030 2035

PM2.5

No Build 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.8

Build 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.4

No Build – Build 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4
46 | P a g e

Public Review and Comment

SCAG is required to provide a 30-day public review and comment 

period for the draft Amendment. A Notice of Availability and Public 

Hearing, and the draft Amendment was posted on SCAG’s website 

at http://scag.ca.gov. Written comments were accepted until 

5:00PM on Thursday, May 9, 2013, via US mail or email to:

Southern California Association of Governments

Attention: Margaret Lin

818 West Seventh Street, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90017

or to lin@scag.ca.gov

A public hearing was also held at SCAG’s Main Office in Los Angeles 

on Wednesday, April 17, 2013, at 10:00AM and was accessible via 

videoconference at SCAG’s regional offices throughout the region.

One public comment was received. The comment, along with 

SCAG’s response, can be found on the table on the following page.

SCAG has also fully coordinated this Amendment with the regional

stakeholders through SCAG’s committee structure. Specifically, staff 

provided periodic reports regarding this Amendment to the 

Transportation Committee (TC), the Energy and Environment 

Committee (EEC), and Transportation Conformity Working Group 

(TCWG).
47 | P a g e

Comments and Responses

DATE NAME AFFILIATION FORMAT COMMENT SUMMARY RESPONSE TO COMMENT

4/15/13 JAMES MEJIA SAN BERNARDINO 

ASSOCIATED 

GOVERNMENTS

E-MAIL SANBAG comment to 2013 

FTIP Consistency Amendment 

#13-04:

1. SANBAG requests to 

change the lead 

agency of project 

200048 from Rancho 

Cucamonga to 

SANBAG in our 

Amendment 4 

submittal. Due to the 

anticipated approval 

of Amendment 4, 

SANBAG would like to 

submit as the project 

Lead Agency as we will 

being taking that role 

for the project’s 

construction phase.

2. We also would like to 

correct the description 

on project 

20061201. There is a 

typo near the end of 

the description that 

states I-12/I-215 IC 

instead of the I-15.

Thank you for your comment. 

The requested changes have 

been made, and appear in this 

final Amendment document.
48 | P a g e

Conclusion

This Amendment maintains the integrity of the transportation 

conformity findings of the adopted 2012-2035 RTP/SCS. This 

Amendment also remains compliant under SB 375 and continues to 

meet and exceed the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets.

Furthermore, the PEIR Addendum associated with this Amendment 

concludes that the proposed project changes would not result in 

either new significant environmental effects or a substantial 

increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. 

Appropriate and adequate procedures have been followed in 

ensuring coordination of this Amendment, allowing all concerned 

parties, stakeholders, and the public ample opportunities to voice 

concern and provide input. In conclusion, this Amendment No. 1 to 

the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS complies with all applicable federal and 

state requirements, including the Transportation Conformity Rule.
Attachments: Public Comments