Georgia
 

Highway Safety Improvement Program
 

2016 Annual Report
 

Prepared by: GA 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Disclaimer
 

Protection of Data from Discovery & Admission into Evidence 

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section [HSIP], shall not be 

subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered 

for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or 

addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.” 

23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, 

or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety 

enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway 

crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any 

highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid 

highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State 

court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any 

occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.” 

ii 
Table of Contents 

Disclaimer...................................................................................................................................................... ii
 

Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................... 1
 

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2
 

Program Structure ........................................................................................................................................ 2
 

Program Administration ........................................................................................................................... 2
 

Program Methodology.............................................................................................................................. 5
 

Progress in Implementing Projects ............................................................................................................. 19
 

Funds Programmed............................................................................................................................. 19
 

General Listing of Projects .................................................................................................................. 21
 

Progress in Achieving Safety Performance Targets .................................................................................... 54
 

Overview of General Safety Trends ........................................................................................................ 54
 

Application of Special Rules .................................................................................................................... 69
 

Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Improvements (Program Evaluation) .......................................... 70
 

SHSP Emphasis Areas .............................................................................................................................. 72
 

Groups of similar project types............................................................................................................... 76
 

Systemic Treatments............................................................................................................................... 78
 

Project Evaluation ....................................................................................................................................... 80
 

Glossary....................................................................................................................................................... 82
 

iii 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Executive Summary
 

The purpose of the Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is to provide for a continuous 

and systematic procedure that identifies and reviews specific traffic safety issues around the state to 

identify locations with potential for improvement. The ultimate goal of the HSIP process is to reduce the 

number of crashes, injuries and fatalities by eliminating certain predominant types of crashes through 

the implementation of engineering solutions. 

Each year, the Department sets aside safety funding to implement safety projects. The total Highway 

Safety Improvement Program allocation rose to approximately $107,075,698 because of the certainty of 

federal availability during Fiscal Year 2016. This past year represented the first year where we saw a rise 

in fatalities after reaching a low in 2014. Georgia’s total number of fatalities increased 22% from the 

previous year to 1.21 fatalities per 100 million vehicles miles traveled. There was a minor rise in 

statewide travel (6%); thus, Georgia’s statewide fatality rate rose for the first time in 10 years. These 

trends are closely monitored by all highway safety professionals in Georgia and remain the focus of the 

state’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). 

The Governor’s Office of Highway Safety (GOHS) develops and supports the SHSP. The plan has specific 

Emphasis Area Task Teams that are organized to develop specific emphasis area countermeasures. 

Countermeasures are represented in proposed safety projects. Combining existing highway safety plans 

represented in HSIP and professional efforts of the task team members has successfully leveraged many 

existing resources to address the safety emphasis target areas. The multi-disciplinary safety teams have 

succeeded in engaging the four safety E’s into their efforts to identify safety projects. 

Projects that comprise the HSIP are usually moderately-sized projects that include intersection 

improvements, signal upgrades (LEDs), ramp improvements, corridor improvements, turn lanes, signage, 

corridor improvements and traffic engineering studies. All public roads are included in one or more of 

the various emphasis areas of the program. Safety projects may be nominated or identified from a large 

number of sources. One of the most common methods is by an analysis of vehicle crash locations and 

types. 

Locations reported by citizens, elected officials, local governments, city and county engineers, 

emergency agencies and metropolitan planning organizations are all accepted for analysis. A project 

may qualify as a safety project because of a positive impact on an existing safety problem, because of 

evidence that it will prevent a hazardous condition, or because, it falls into one of several pre-approved 

categories of improvements that are known to provide safety benefits. Examples of this last category 

include guardrail, traffic signals, railroad crossing warning devices, and most intersection improvements. 

Public pedestrian and bicycle facilities and traffic calming projects may also be eligible for hazard 

elimination projects. Once a project has been identified, a benefit/cost analysis is performed. 

1 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

The Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) and local governments are encouraged to develop high 

crash lists for local roads that can be used to identify hazard elimination projects. City and county 

engineers and local public agencies are encouraged annually to examine local road systems and 

recommend safety projects. These projects will be submitted to the District Traffic Engineer for approval 

and recommendation for project concept and project programming in the Office of Traffic Operations in 

exactly the same manner as projects on the State Routes. 

The rise in fatalities in 2015 was quickly recognized. The aggressive safety emphasis launched by Georgia 

DOT, the Department of Public Safety and the Governor’s Office of Highway Safety were highlighted by 

our Drive Alert Arrive Alive safety campaign, the increased HSIP program, the monthly GDOT District 

Safety Performance Metrics, and the launch of the SHSP Distracted Driver Task Team. The efforts are all 

part of a unified effort to keep the state’s crash totals trending downward. Every Georgia DOT project is 

designed and constructed to meet or exceed federal safety guidelines. GDOT continues to look for still 

more ways to improve safety. The Office of Traffic Operations is refining and utilizing our crash data and 

road safety audits to improve safety and reduce fatalities, injuries and crashes. We are building 

roundabout intersections, increasing the use of cable barrier on divided roadways, raising center 

concrete median barriers, installing rumble strips, installing more retro-reflective signage, applying 

pavement markings, coordinating traffic signal timing and installing pedestrian accommodations to 

make our roads safer. 

Introduction 

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program 

with the purpose of achieving a significant reduction in fatalities and serious 

injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 924.15, States are 

required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP 

implementation and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent 

with the HSIP MAP-21 Reporting Guidance dated February 13, 2013 and consists 

of four sections: program structure, progress in implementing HSIP projects, 

progress in achieving safety performance targets, and assessment of the 

effectiveness of the improvements. 

Program Structure 

Program Administration 

How are Highway Safety Improvement Program funds allocated in a State? 

Central 

2 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Describe how local roads are addressed as part of Highway Safety Improvement Program. 

The state is continuing the high risk rural roads program as part of the HSIP. Additionally the state has an 

established Off System Safety Program that works through the same program coordinators. The 

Department employs District Coordinators that work with the Department's District Traffic Operations 

and local government to identify a group of roads that are not part of the state highway system and 

have safety deficiencies. Once the roads are selected, the list is prioritized and selected by a review 

team. The cost of the planned safety improvements are taken into consideration as well as the 

effectiveness of each countermeasure. The Department dedicates $1 million annually for each of the 

state's seven construction districts. This money is solely used to fund our off-system safety program. 

Additionally, larger HRRR projects are individually programmed using HSIP funds. The work normally 

consists of installing retro-reflective signage, applying pavement markings, installing rumble strips or 

guardrail. 

Identify which internal partners are involved with Highway Safety Improvement Program planning. 

Design 

Planning 

Maintenance 

Operations 

Governors Highway Safety Office 

Other-District traffic egnineers 

Briefly describe coordination with internal partners. 

Georgia’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) involves a variety of internal and external partners at the 

federal, state and local levels as well as the private sector. The SHSP was updated and in place during FY 

2015 with Task Teams developing plans for the various Emphasis Areas. The task teams are comprised of 

a combination of engineering, emergency management, enforcement and education professionals who 

come from community organizations, private businesses, schools, and public institutions. The teams 

work together to establish measureable goal(s) that are designed to improve one or more of the 

established emphasis areas. Throughout the year, the teams track their progress against their goal(s). 

The teams report their progress to the participating groups and to the Governor’s Office of Highway 

Safety (GOHS). Also, the GOHS hold quarterly Safety Program Leadership Meetings for the Executive 

Board and task team leaders. GDOT’s Safety Action Plan is executed to implement engineering solutions 

to highway safety problems. GDOT’s Safety Action Plan is a key component of its HSIP and both are 

aligned with the goals of the state’s SHSP and a number of its Emphasis Areas. 

Georgia’s SHSP Key Emphasis Areas are as follows: 

Occupant Protection - Seatbelts and Air Bags 

3 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Serious Crash Type - Intersections, Keeping Vehicles on the Road – lane departure, Head-on and Cross 

Median Crashes, Minimizing 

Consequences of Leaving Road, Work Zones 

Aggressive Driving/Super Speeder 

Impaired Driver 

Age related issues - Graduated Driver's Licensing, Younger Adult Drivers, Older Drivers 

Non-motorized User - Pedestrians, Bicyclists 

Vehicle Type - Heavy Trucks, Motorcycles 

Trauma System/Increasing EMS Capabilities 

Traffic/Crash Records and Data Analysis 

Traffic Incident Management Enhancement (TIME) 

New Team: Distracted Driving 

We also work closely with GDOT Maintenance and District Traffic Operations. As road maintenance 

plans are being developed the district TO teams review sites and plans to ensure signs and pavement 

marking meet current specifications. The TO teams and HSIP/Safety Section work with our Off System 

Coordinators to identify good project locations using the data driven county report cards. Additionally, 

we work with Design Policy to update and refine pedestrian safety through the Urban Design Guide and 

coordinate these effort with the office of Planning to ensure design elements are incorporated when 

appropriate. These activities are critical pieces to support the goals of the Serious Crash Type Task 

Team, Pedestrian / Bicycle task teams while promoting the alignment between HSIP and SHSP. 

Identify which external partners are involved with Highway Safety Improvement Program planning. 

Metropolitan Planning Organizations 

Governors Highway Safety Office 

Local Government Association 

Other-Public Safety & Local Law Enforcement 

Identify any program administration practices used to implement the HSIP that have changed since 

the last reporting period. 

Other-We have reorganized our team at GDOT Office of Traffic Operations. We have a new project 

manager that helps track projects as they progress through the PDP. 

4 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Describe any other aspects of Highway Safety Improvement Program Administration on which you 

would like to elaborate. 

Over the past year Georgia DOT has updated the State’s HSIP Program Guide. We worked with FHWA 

Georgia Division Office to update and edit the new version. This will be used to drive program 

implementation based upon crash data. Incorporating crash severity into funding allocations, HSIP 

dollars will be divided among; Pedestrian, HRRR, Off System Safety, Roadway Departure and Intersection 

Improvement. This design is a critical part of our program administration. 

Also, we have completed the geo-location of 2013, 2014 and 2015 crashes. Having improved crash 

location information that is tied to our road center line network will allow Georgia to better manage the 

HSIP program and improve our responsiveness in selecting the best projects. 

Program Methodology 

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP. 

Median Barrier Intersection Safe Corridor 

Horizontal Curve Bicycle Safety Rural State Highways 

Skid Hazard Crash Data Red Light Running Prevention 

Roadway Departure Low-Cost Spot Improvements Sign Replacement And 

Improvement 

Local Safety Pedestrian Safety Right Angle Crash 

Left Turn Crash Shoulder Improvement 

Program: Median Barrier
 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2012
 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure	 Roadway 

All crashes Traffic	 Median width 

Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency 

Probability of specific crash types 

Excess proportions of specific crash types 

5 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

No 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Ranking based on B/C 2 

Available funding 1 

Program: Intersection 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2012 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic Functional classification 

Volume 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency 

Relative severity index 

Crash rate 

Critical rate 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

No 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

6 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

minimum severity index 1 

Program: Safe Corridor 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2012 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic Horizontal curvature 

Volume Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency 

Relative severity index 

Crash rate 

Critical rate 

Excess proportions of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

No 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding 1 

Program: Horizontal Curve 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2012 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic Horizontal curvature 

7 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency 

Relative severity index 

Excess proportions of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

No 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding 1
 

severity index 2
 

Program: Bicycle Safety 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2012 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes Traffic 

only 

Other-Bicycle Crashes 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Probability of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

Yes 

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

8 
 

 

 

 

 

Program: Rural State Highways 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2012 

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding 1 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic Functional classification 

Fatal and serious injury crashes Volume 

only 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency 

Relative severity index 

Crash rate 

Critical rate 

Excess proportions of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

No 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Ranking based on B/C 2 

Available funding 1 

9 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Program: Skid Hazard 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2013 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic 

Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency 

Crash rate 

Probability of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

No 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Ranking based on B/C 1 

Available funding 2 

Program: Crash Data 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2013 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes	 Exposure Roadway 

All crashes	 Traffic Functional classification 

Volume 

Lane miles 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

10 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Crash frequency 

Crash rate 

Level of service of safety (LOSS) 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

Yes 

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

No 

If no, describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program. 

These projects are generally more systemic in nature 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

Competitive application process 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Relative Weight in Scoring 

Ranking based on B/C 100 

Program: Red Light Running Prevention 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2013 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic 

Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency 

Other-identification of crashes that may be correctable by red-light cameras 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

Yes 

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

11 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding 1 

Program: Roadway Departure 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2013 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic Horizontal curvature 

Fatal and serious injury crashes Volume 

only 

Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency 

Relative severity index 

Crash rate 

Critical rate 

Excess proportions of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

No 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Ranking based on B/C 1 

Available funding 2 

12 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Program: Sign Replacement And Improvement 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2013
 

 

 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Program: Low-Cost Spot Improvements 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2013 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic Functional classification 

Fatal and serious injury crashes Volume 

only 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency 

Crash rate 

Probability of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

Yes 

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Ranking based on B/C 1 

What data types were used in the program methodology?
 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

13 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Crash frequency 

Crash rate 

Excess proportions of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

Yes 

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

Competitive application process 

Other-Off system route can receive marking upgrades from the off system safety program application 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Ranking based on B/C 1 

Program: Local Safety 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2013 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency 

Probability of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

Yes 

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

Competitive application process 

14 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding 1 

Program: Pedestrian Safety 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2013 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic Functional classification 

Fatal and serious injury crashes Volume 

only 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash rate 

Excess proportions of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

Yes 

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Ranking based on B/C 1 

15 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Program: Right Angle Crash 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2013 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic Functional classification 

Fatal and serious injury crashes Volume 

only 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency 

Crash rate 

Excess proportions of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

Yes 

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Ranking based on B/C 1 

Program: Left Turn Crash 

Date of Program Methodology: 7/1/2013 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic Functional classification 

Fatal and serious injury crashes Volume 

only 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency 

Crash rate 

16 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Program: Shoulder Improvement 

Date of Program Methodology: 5/1/2015 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Excess proportions of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

Yes 

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Ranking based on B/C 1 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Probability of specific crash types 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program? 

No 

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation? 

selection committee 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding 1 

17 
 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

What proportion of highway safety improvement program funds address systemic improvements? 

32% 

Highway safety improvement program funds are used to address which of the following systemic 

improvements? 

Cable Median Barriers 

Install/Improve Signing 

Install/Improve Pavement Marking and/or 

Delineation 

Upgrade Guard Rails 

Other-High Friction Surface Treatment 

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

Engineering Study 

Road Safety Assessment 

Identify any program methodology practices used to implement the HSIP that have changed since the 

last reporting period. 

Other-As our crashes are becoming geo-located, we are working on some approaches to identify safety 

needs 

Describe any other aspects of the Highway Safety Improvement Program methodology on which you 

would like to elaborate. 

Over the past year we have been working with our State Law enforcement to develop sound approaches 

for geo-locating crashes. Based upon this investigation, we will be improving our crash reporting tools 

and requirements in the upcoming year. 

18 
 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Progress in Implementing Projects 

Funds Programmed 

Reporting period for Highway Safety Improvement Program funding. 

State Fiscal Year 

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category. 

Funding Category Programmed* Obligated 

HSIP (Section 148) $70,000,000.00 89 % $103,190,357.36 92 % 

HRRR Special Rule $8,636,575.72 11 % $8,636,575.72 8 % 

Totals $78,636,575.72 100% $111,826,933.08 100% 

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) safety projects? 

$7,000,000.00 

How much funding is obligated to local safety projects? 

$7,652,450.00 

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$1,000,000.00 

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$941,773.00 

19 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas during the reporting 

period? 

$0.00 

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during the reporting 

period? 

$0.00 

Discuss impediments to obligating Highway Safety Improvement Program funds and plans to 

overcome this in the future. 

Safety is a core responsibility of Georgia DOT. We build safety into all of our programs. HSIP is only a 

part of the Department’s total program and safety effort. The available funding for HSIP has been 

increased, and the greatest hurdle has been overcome by the passage of a long term federal 

transportation bill that has clearly established funding levels. 

Describe any other aspects of the general Highway Safety Improvement Program implementation 

progress on which you would like to elaborate. 

We thank the efforts of FHWA to support the US Congress with the passage of the FAST Act 

20 
 

General Listing of Projects 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

List each highway safety improvement project obligated during the reporting period. 

Project Improvement Category Outpu 

t 

HSIP 

Cost 

Total 

Cost 

Fundi 

ng 

Function 

al 

AAD 

T 

Spe 

ed 

Roadw 

ay 

Relationship to SHSP 

Categ 

ory 

Classifica 

tion 

Owners 

hip 

Emphasis 

Area 

Strategy 

0002882 SR Roadway 6 2160000 2160000 HSIP Urban 1600 45 State Roadway Reduce 

155 FM Superelevation / cross Miles (Secti Minor 0 Highwa Departur Roadway 

HAMPTON- slope on Arterial y e Departur 

LOCUST 148) Agency e Crash 

GROVE/BILL Severity 

GARDNE 

0006294 Pedestrians and 5 280000 280000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

PEDESTRIAN bicyclists Pedestrian Numb (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

IMPROVEME signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

NTS @ 5 SR intersection 148) Agency and 

LOCATIONS I Timing 

0007313 SR Intersection traffic 1 3656842. 3656842. HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Minimize 

372 @ control Modify control - Numb 67 67 (Secti on of Highwa ons Angle 

Crabapple Rd modifications to ers on multiple y Crashes 

- roundabout 148) FC Agency 

Roundabout 

0008288 SR Intersection geometry 1 1000000 1000000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

12/US 278 Intersection geometrics Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

FM DEKALB - ers on multiple y Severity 

MEDICAL miscellaneous/other/un 148) FC Agency at 

PKWY TO CR specified Intersecti 

ons 

21 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

0008375 SR Intersection traffic 1 4108232. 4108232. HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

8/US 78@ CR control Intersection Numb 39 39 (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

268/MANN traffic control - other ers on multiple y Severity 

RD/MASON 148) FC Agency at 

CREEK RD Intersecti 

ons 

0008420 SR Intersection traffic 1 3658881. 3658881. HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

38/US 84 @ control Intersection Numb 23 23 (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

CR 439/CLAY traffic control - other ers on multiple y Severity 

ROAD/CS 148) FC Agency at 

1271/HOL Intersecti 

ons 

0008627 CR Roadway Pavement 5 1522936. 1522936. HRRR Rural 1300 45 County Roadway Reduce 

1300/Union surface - high friction Numb 12 12 Specia Minor Highwa Departur Roadway 

Church Rd surface ers l Rule Collector y e Departur 

from SR 53 Agency e Crash 

to SR 2 Severity 

0008884 SR Intersection traffic 1 2208098. 2208098. HRRR Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Minimize 

18 @ SR 87 - control Modify control - Numb 27 27 Specia on of Highwa ons Angle 

HRRR modifications to ers l Rule multiple y Crashes 

roundabout FC Agency 

0008884 SR Intersection traffic 1 512405.2 512405.2 HRRR Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Minimize 

18 @ SR 87 - control Modify control - Numb 2 2 Specia on of Highwa ons Angle 

HRRR modifications to ers l Rule multiple y Crashes 

roundabout FC Agency 

0009620 SR Intersection traffic 1 1715340. 1715340. HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Minimize 

225 @ MT control Modify control - Numb 83 83 (Secti on of Highwa ons Angle 

Carmel modifications to ers on multiple y Crashes 

Road/Mitche roundabout 148) FC Agency 

ll Bridge Ro 

0009887 SR 

372 @ SR 

369 -

Intersection traffic 

control Modify control -

modifications to 

1 

Numb 

ers 

1670000 1670000 HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

Intersecti 

on of 

multiple 

0 45 State 

Highwa 

y 

Intersecti 

ons 

Minimize 

Angle 

Crashes 

22 
 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

ROUNDABO 

UT 

roundabout 148) FC Agency 

0009938 SR 

53 @ SR 183-

ROUNDABO 

UT 

Intersection traffic 

control Modify control -

modifications to 

roundabout 

1 

Numb 

ers 

790000 790000 HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

Intersecti 

on of 

multiple 

FC 

0 45 State 

Highwa 

y 

Agency 

Intersecti 

ons 

Minimize 

Angle 

Crashes 

0009953 SR 

81 @ CR 

461/CR 

462/BOLD 

SPRINGS 

ROAD-RO 

Intersection traffic 

control Modify control -

modifications to 

roundabout 

1 

Numb 

ers 

4104102. 

31 

4104102. 

31 

HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

Intersecti 

on of 

multiple 

FC 

0 45 State 

Highwa 

y 

Agency 

Intersecti 

ons 

Minimize 

Angle 

Crashes 

0009960 SR 

22 @ 

Knoxville Rd 

-

Roundabout 

Intersection traffic 

control Modify control -

modifications to 

roundabout 

1 

Numb 

ers 

200000 200000 HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

Intersecti 

on of 

multiple 

FC 

0 45 State 

Highwa 

y 

Agency 

Intersecti 

ons 

Minimize 

Angle 

Crashes 

0009966 SR 

42 @ SR 87 -

Roundabout 

Intersection traffic 

control Modify control -

modifications to 

roundabout 

1 

Numb 

ers 

400000 400000 HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

Intersecti 

on of 

multiple 

FC 

0 45 State 

Highwa 

y 

Agency 

Intersecti 

ons 

Minimize 

Angle 

Crashes 

0009967 SR 

14 @ SR 42 -

Roundabout 

Intersection traffic 

control Modify control -

modifications to 

roundabout 

1 

Numb 

ers 

200000 200000 HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

Intersecti 

on of 

multiple 

FC 

0 45 State 

Highwa 

y 

Agency 

Intersecti 

ons 

Minimize 

Angle 

Crashes 

0009995 

SHARP 

CURVE 

TREATMENT 

S @ SEV 

LOCS IN 

DISTR 

Roadway Pavement 

surface - high friction 

surface 

10 

Numb 

ers 

8220659. 

48 

8220659. 

48 

HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

Multiple 

Road and 

Locations 

0 45 State 

Highwa 

y 

Agency 

Roadway 

Departur 

e 

Minimize 

Severity 

of 

Roadway 

Departur 

e Crashes 

0009996 Roadway Pavement 10 4258093. 4258093. HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Roadway Minimize 

23 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

SHARP surface - high friction Numb 35 35 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

CURVE surface ers on Locations y e of 

TREATMENT 148) Agency Roadway 

S @ SEV Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

DISTR 

0009998 Roadway Pavement 10 1565210 1565210 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Roadway Minimize 

SHARP surface - high friction Numb 5.63 5.63 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

CURVE surface ers on Locations y e of 

TREATMENT 148) Agency Roadway 

S @ SEV Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

DISTR 

0010292 SR Intersection traffic 2 3480091. 3480091. HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

520/US 82 @ control Intersection Numb 42 42 (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

CR traffic control - other ers on multiple y Severity 

459/COUNTY 148) FC Agency at 

LINE ROAD - I Intersecti 

ons 

0010350 SR Pedestrians and 1 1439018. 1439018. HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

8/SR 10 bicyclists Pedestrian Numb 62 62 (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

FROM CS signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

1860/PIEDM intersection 148) Agency and 

ONT AVE TO Timing 

SR 

0010419 SR Intersection traffic 1 3983464. 3983464. HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

140 @ 

Hembree Rd 

control Modify control -

modifications to 

roundabout 

Numb 

ers 

6 6 (Secti 

on 

148) 

on of 

multiple 

FC 

Highwa 

y 

Agency 

ons Crash 

Severity 

at 

Intersecti 

ons 

0010455 Pedestrians and 5 1207064. 1207064. HSIP Includes 0 45 Work Pedestria Improve 

BALDWIN bicyclists Miscellaneous Numb 19 19 (Secti All Roads on ns Safe 

COUNTY pedestrians and ers on State Walking 

24 
 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

SCHOOL bicyclists 148) and Off for 

SYSTEM @ 5 State Pedestria 

SCHOOLS System ns 

0010558 C. 

A. GRAY -

SRTS 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists Miscellaneous 

pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

1 

Numb 

ers 

170062 170062 HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

Includes 

All Roads 

0 45 Work 

on 

State 

and Off 

State 

Pedestria 

ns 

Improve 

Safe 

Walking 

for 

Pedestria 

System ns 

0010848 CR Roadway delineation 1 106728 106728 HRRR Rural 1300 45 County Roadway Minimize 

1300/Union Longitudinal pavement Numb Specia Minor Highwa Departur Severity 

Church Rd markings - remarking ers l Rule Collector y e of 

from SR 53 Agency Roadway 

to SR 2 Departur 

e Crashes 

0010848 CR Roadway delineation 1 1067.28 1067.28 HRRR Rural 1300 45 County Roadway Minimize 

1300/Union Longitudinal pavement Numb Specia Minor Highwa Departur Severity 

Church Rd markings - remarking ers l Rule Collector y e of 

from SR 53 Agency Roadway 

to SR 2 Departur 

e Crashes 

0010849 SR Intersection geometry 1 1463813. 1463813. HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

35/US 319 @ Intersection geometrics Numb 73 73 (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

CR - realignment to align ers on multiple y Severity 

89/INDIAN offset cross streets 148) FC Agency at 

LAKE DRIVE Intersecti 

ons 

0012754 SR 3 Intersection geometry 1 313941.9 313941.9 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

@ CR Auxiliary lanes - add Numb 4 4 (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

8/CEDARCRE left-turn lane ers on multiple y Severity 

ST 148) FC Agency at 

ROAD/AWTR Intersecti 

EY CHURCH ons 

25 
 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

0013149 Roadway delineation 9 76688.54 76688.54 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013150 Roadway delineation 7 89250.67 89250.67 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @7 Departur 

LOCATION e Crashes 

0013152 Non-infrastructure 1 1500000 1500000 HSIP Includes 0 45 Work Intersecti Minimize 

Roundabout Non-infrastructure - Numb (Secti All Roads on ons Angle 

Feasibility other ers on State Crashes 

Studies - 148) and Off 

Phase 1 State 

System 

0013175 SR Intersection traffic 1 200000 200000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

12 @ CR control Intersection Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

5192/COVE traffic control - other ers on multiple y Severity 

LAKE 148) FC Agency at 

ROAD/WELL Intersecti 

BORN RO ons 

0013197 CR Intersection traffic 1 400000 400000 HRRR Intersecti 0 45 County Intersecti Minimize 

396/Rayonie control Modify control - Numb Specia on of Highwa ons Angle 

r Rd @ CR modifications to ers l Rule multiple y Crashes 

392/Spring roundabout FC Agency 

Grove R 

0013237 OFF Roadway delineation 17 366978.7 366978.7 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 17 Departur 

26 
 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013257 SR 4 Pedestrians and 5 200000 200000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

BU; SR 23; SR bicyclists Pedestrian Numb (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

26 & SR 46 @ signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

5 LOCS - P intersection 148) Agency and 

Timing 

0013258 SR Pedestrians and 4 150000 150000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

4; SR 17 & SR bicyclists Pedestrian Numb (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

24 @ 4 LOCS signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

- intersection 148) Agency and 

PEDESTRIAN Timing 

0013259 SR Pedestrians and 5 200000 200000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

12; SR 15; SR bicyclists Pedestrian Numb (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

24 BYP; SR signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

36 & SR 162 intersection 148) Agency and 

@ Timing 

0013260 SR Pedestrians and 5 200000 200000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

22 ; SR 24; SR bicyclists Pedestrian Numb (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

29; SR 44 & signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

SR 57 @ 5 LO intersection 148) Agency and 

Timing 

0013275 OFF Roadway delineation 48 385795.5 385795.5 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 1 1 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 48 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013299 OFF Roadway delineation 4 380448.3 380448.3 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 2 2 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 4 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

27 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

0013300 OFF Roadway delineation 17 131265.1 131265.1 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 6 6 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 17 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013326 OFF Roadway delineation 74 167641.0 167641.0 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 6 6 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 74 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013327 OFF Roadway delineation 14 182788.5 182788.5 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 9 9 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 14 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013328 OFF Roadway delineation 6 55255.08 55255.08 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 6 CR Departur 

LOCS e Crashes 

0013329 OFF Roadway delineation 7 601485.3 601485.3 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 7 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013330 OFF Roadway delineation 6 39834.4 39834.4 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

28 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

MTS @ 6 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013331 OFF Roadway delineation 5 103355.5 103355.5 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 7 7 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 5 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013333 I-20 Intersection traffic 1 200000 200000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

EB @ CS control Modify control - Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

2776/MAYN modifications to ers on multiple y Severity 

ARD roundabout 148) FC Agency at 

TERRACE Intersecti 

ons 

0013341 OFF Roadway delineation 31 129742.0 129742.0 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 8 8 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 31 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013342 OFF Roadway delineation 17 255062.1 255062.1 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 2 2 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 17 Departur 

LOCS D e Crashes 

0013343 OFF Roadway delineation 5 222913.1 222913.1 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 6 6 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 5 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013346 OFF Roadway delineation 7 139557.7 139557.7 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

29 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 6 6 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 7 CR Departur 

LOCS e Crashes 

0013347 OFF Roadway delineation 11 218191.6 218191.6 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 6 6 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 11 CR Departur 

LOC e Crashes 

0013348 OFF Roadway delineation 9 147791.9 147791.9 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 9 9 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013349 OFF Roadway delineation 9 261214.6 261214.6 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 6 6 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013350 OFF Roadway delineation 13 181654.8 181654.8 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 1 1 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 13 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013351 OFF Roadway delineation 6 361923.9 361923.9 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 1 1 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 6 Departur 

30 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013352 Roadway delineation 10 99798.1 99798.1 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 10 CR Departur 

LOC e Crashes 

0013353 Roadway delineation 20 204877.7 204877.7 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 4 4 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 20 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013354 OFF Roadway delineation 5 159919.6 159919.6 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 1 1 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 5 CR Departur 

LOCS e Crashes 

0013355 Roadway delineation 8 592907.3 592907.3 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

SAFETY Longitudinal pavement Numb 7 7 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

PROJECT @ 8 markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

LOCS IN 148) Agency Roadway 

CLAYTON Departur 

COUNTY e Crashes 

0013356 CS Roadway delineation 1 349115.7 349115.7 HSIP Multiple 0 45 City of Roadway Minimize 

145/NORTHR Longitudinal pavement Numb 4 4 (Secti Road and Municip Departur Severity 

IDGE RD @1 markings - remarking ers on Locations al e of 

LOC - OFF- 148) Highwa Roadway 

SYSTEM S y Departur 

Agency e Crashes 

0013357 CS Roadway delineation 2 115157.4 115157.4 HSIP Multiple 0 45 City of Roadway Minimize 

1720 & CS Longitudinal pavement Numb 2 2 (Secti Road and Municip Departur Severity 

31 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

4519 @ 2 markings - remarking ers on Locations al e of 

LOCS - OFF- 148) Highwa Roadway 

SYSTEM SA y 

Agency 

Departur 

e Crashes 

0013358 Roadway delineation 2 154458.2 154458.2 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 9 9 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 20 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013359 Roadway delineation 20 339546.8 339546.8 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 5 5 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 23 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013360 Roadway delineation 23 393412.1 393412.1 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 7 7 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 8 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013361 Roadway delineation 8 128885.9 128885.9 HSIP Multiple 0 45 City of Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 5 5 (Secti Road and Municip Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations al e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Highwa Roadway 

NTS @ 36 CS y Departur 

LOC Agency e Crashes 

0013373 SR Interchange design 1 250000 250000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Improve 

22 @ CR Interchange design - Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Safety for 

1505/Bradle other ers on multiple y All 

y Park Dr - 148) FC Agency Roadway 

DDI Users 

32 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

0013374 SR Intersection geometry 1 200000 200000 HSIP Urban 2100 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

120 @ CS Auxiliary lanes - add Numb (Secti Minor 0 Highwa ons Crash 

1360/Old left-turn lane ers on Arterial y Severity 

Norcross Rd 148) Agency at 

Intersecti 

ons 

0013375 SR Access management 1 300000 300000 HSIP Urban 2100 45 State Intersecti Improve 

120 from SR Change in access - close Miles (Secti Minor 0 Highwa ons Safety for 

316 to CS or restrict existing on Arterial y All 

1126/Hurrica access 148) Agency Roadway 

ne Sh Users 

0013543 Off Roadway delineation 36 259229.3 259229.3 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

System Longitudinal pavement Numb 8 8 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

Safety markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

Improvemen 148) Agency Roadway 

ts Departur 

e Crashes 

0013547 Off Roadway delineation 1 497055.3 497055.3 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

System Longitudinal pavement Numb 4 4 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

Safety markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

Improvemen 148) Agency Roadway 

ts Departur 

e Crashes 

0013548 Off Roadway delineation 1 236479.0 236479.0 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

System Longitudinal pavement Numb 8 8 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

Safety markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

Improvemen 148) Agency Roadway 

ts Departur 

e Crashes 

0013550 RC Pedestrians and 1 822005 822005 HSIP Includes 0 45 Work Pedestria Improve 

CONTRACT bicyclists Miscellaneous Numb (Secti All Roads on ns Safety for 

FOR pedestrians and ers on State At Risk 

BIKE/PED; bicyclists 148) and Off Road 

SRTS & TDS - State Users 

33 
 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

FY System 

0013592 Off Roadway delineation 113 87041.4 87041.4 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

System Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

Safety markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

Improvemen 148) Agency Roadway 

ts @ 113 Departur 

Locs e Crashes 

0013632 I-85 Roadside Barrier end 103 25000 25000 HSIP Rural 8520 65 State Roadway Minimize 

from S of SR treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

378 to N of cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

SR 211 @ 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

103 Departur 

e Crashes 

0013633 I-85 Roadside Barrier end 100 25000 25000 HSIP Rural 5190 65 State Roadway Minimize 

from N of SR treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

211 to N of cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

SR 11 @ 100 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

Departur 

e Crashes 

0013634 I-85 Roadside Barrier end 100 25000 25000 HSIP Rural 5190 65 State Roadway Minimize 

from N of SR treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

11 to S of SR cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

15 @ 100 B 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

Departur 

e Crashes 

0013635 I-85 Roadside Barrier end 90 25000 25000 HSIP Rural 5160 65 State Roadway Minimize 

from S of SR treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

15 to S of CR cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

16/Neal Rd 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

Departur 

e Crashes 

0013636 I-85 Roadside Barrier end 78 20000 20000 HSIP Rural 4660 65 State Roadway Minimize 

from S of treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

34 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Neal Rd to S cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

of Old 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

Stageco Departur 

e Crashes 

0013637 I-85 Roadside Barrier end 78 20000 20000 HSIP Rural 4310 65 State Roadway Minimize 

from S of treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

Carnesville cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

to S of SR 77 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

@ Departur 

e Crashes 

0013638 I-20 Roadside Barrier end 45 20000 20000 HSIP Rural 6550 65 State Roadway Minimize 

from E of treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

Miller cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

Academy Rd 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

to E of D Departur 

e Crashes 

0013639 I-20 Roadside Barrier end 61 20000 20000 HSIP Rural 1184 65 State Roadway Minimize 

from E of treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 00 Highwa Departur Severity 

Daniel Rd to cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

W of 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

Chattahoo Departur 

e Crashes 

0013640 I-20 Roadside Barrier end 84 25000 25000 HSIP Rural 1361 65 State Roadway Minimize 

from E of treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 00 Highwa Departur Severity 

Chattahooch cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

ee River to E 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

of Departur 

e Crashes 

0013641 I-20 Roadside Barrier end 56 20000 20000 HSIP Rural 1041 65 State Roadway Minimize 

from I- treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 00 Highwa Departur Severity 

85/Gwinnett cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

to CS 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

853/Athens S Departur 

e Crashes 

35 
 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

0013642 I675 from I75/Hnery to 

I285/DeKalb 

@ 29 

Roadside Barrier end 

treatments (crash 

cushions, terminals) 

29 

Numb 

ers 

15000 15000 HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate 

7240 

0 

65 State 

Highwa 

y 

Agency 

Roadway 

Departur 

e 

Minimize 

Severity 

of 

Roadway 

Departur 

e Crashes 

0013644 I- Roadside Barrier end 71 20000 20000 HSIP Rural 1864 65 State Roadway Minimize 

285 @ 71 treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 00 Highwa Departur Severity 

BCT Locs cushions, terminals) ers on 

148) 

Arterial -

Interstate 

y 

Agency 

e of 

Roadway 

Departur 

e Crashes 

0013645 I- Roadside Barrier end 32 15000 15000 HSIP Rural 6920 65 State Roadway Minimize 

185 from SR treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

520 to N of cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

ST 85 @ 32 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

BCT L Departur 

e Crashes 

0013647 I-75 Roadside Barrier end 47 20000 20000 HSIP Rural 2140 65 State Roadway Minimize 

from treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 00 Highwa Departur Severity 

Chattahooch cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

ee River to S 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

of Wood Departur 

e Crashes 

0013648 I-75 

from Nance 

Spring Rd to 

Tennessee 

Sta 

Roadside Barrier end 

treatments (crash 

cushions, terminals) 

96 

Numb 

ers 

25000 25000 HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate 

6840 

0 

65 State 

Highwa 

y 

Agency 

Roadway 

Departur 

e 

Minimize 

Severity 

of 

Roadway 

Departur 

e Crashes 

0013649 I-75 Roadside Barrier end 56 20000 20000 HSIP Rural 7080 65 State Roadway Minimize 

FM N OF SR treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

61 TO S OF cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

WHITFIELD 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

36 
 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

COUNT Departur 

e Crashes 

0013651 I-59 Roadside Barrier end 69 20000 20000 HSIP Rural 2020 65 State Roadway Minimize 

FROM treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

ALABAMA cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

STATE LINE 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

TO LAKE Departur 

HILLS e Crashes 

0013652 I-24 Roadside Barrier end 62 20000 20000 HSIP Rural 6510 65 State Roadway Minimize 

@ 7 BCT treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

LOCS & I-59 cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

@ 62 BCT 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

LOCS IN Departur 

e Crashes 

0013653 I-20 Roadside Barrier end 91 25000 25000 HSIP Rural 7120 65 State Roadway Minimize 

FROM SR treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

44/GREENE cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

TO SR 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

104/RICHMO Departur 

ND e Crashes 

0013654 I-16 Roadside Barrier end 116 25000 25000 HSIP Rural 1950 65 State Roadway Minimize 

FM W OF SR treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

26/TREUTLE cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

N TO HAWK 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

RD/EMA Departur 

e Crashes 

0013655 I-16 Roadside Barrier end 99 25000 25000 HSIP Rural 2990 65 State Roadway Minimize 

FROM treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

GRIFFIN cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

FERRY ROAD 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

TO OLD Departur 

RIVER e Crashes 

0013656 I-16 Roadside Barrier end 53 20000 20000 HSIP Rural 5730 65 State Roadway Minimize 

37 
 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

FM W OF treatments (crash Numb (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Departur Severity 

BLOOMINGD cushions, terminals) ers on Arterial - y e of 

ALE RD TO W 148) Interstate Agency Roadway 

OF MLK B Departur 

e Crashes 

0013682 SR 9 Intersection traffic 1 500000 500000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Minimize 

@ Dawson control Modify control - Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Angle 

Forest Rd - modifications to ers on multiple y Crashes 

Roundabout roundabout 148) FC Agency 

0013683 SR Intersection traffic 1 500000 500000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Minimize 

77 @ SR 77 control Modify control - Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Angle 

Conn - modifications to ers on multiple y Crashes 

Roundabout roundabout 148) FC Agency 

0013684 SR Intersection traffic 1 200000 200000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

1/US 27 @ 

SR 151 

control Intersection 

traffic control - other 

Numb 

ers 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

on of 

multiple 

FC 

Highwa 

y 

Agency 

ons Crash 

Severity 

at 

Intersecti 

ons 

0013685 SR Intersection traffic 1 500000 500000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Minimize 

90 @ Lower control Modify control - Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Angle 

Rebecca Rd - modifications to ers on multiple y Crashes 

Roundabout roundabout 148) FC Agency 

0013686 SR Intersection traffic 1 500000 500000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Minimize 

155 @ control Modify control - Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Angle 

Panola Rd - modifications to ers on multiple y Crashes 

Roundabout roundabout 148) FC Agency 

0013687 SR Intersection traffic 3 350000 350000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

73 Loop - RCuts control Intersection 

traffic control - other 

Numb 

ers 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

on of 

multiple 

FC 

Highwa 

y 

Agency 

ons Crash 

Severity 

at 

Intersecti 

ons 

38 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

0013689 Pedestrians and 11 330000 330000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

Pedestrain bicyclists Pedestrian Numb (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

Upgrades @ signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

11 Locs in intersection 148) Agency and 

Paulding Timing 

0013690 Pedestrians and 21 630000 630000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

Pedestrain bicyclists Pedestrian Numb (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

Upgrades @ signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

21 Locs in intersection 148) Agency and 

Floyd Cou Timing 

0013691 Pedestrians and 27 810000 810000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

Pedestrain bicyclists Pedestrian Numb (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

Upgrades @ signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

27 Locs in intersection 148) Agency and 

Bartow an Timing 

0013692 Pedestrians and 27 810000 810000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

Pedestrain bicyclists Pedestrian Numb (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

Upgrades @ signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

27 Locs in intersection 148) Agency and 

District Timing 

0013693 Pedestrians and 22 660000 660000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

Pedestrain bicyclists Pedestrian Numb (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

Upgrades @ signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

22 Locs in intersection 148) Agency and 

Catoosa, Timing 

0013694 Pedestrians and 11 330000 330000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

Pedestrian bicyclists Pedestrian Numb (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

Upgrades @ signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

11 Locs in intersection 148) Agency and 

Dade and Timing 

0013696 SR 

42 @ CS 

716/England 

Intersection traffic 

control Modify control -

modifications to 

1 

Numb 

ers 

500000 500000 HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

Intersecti 

on of 

multiple 

0 45 State 

Highwa 

y 

Intersecti 

ons 

Minimize 

Angle 

Crashes 

39 
 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Chapel 

Rd/Burd Rd -

roundabout 148) FC Agency 

0013697 SR Intersection traffic 1 500000 500000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Minimize 

81 @ CR control Modify control - Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Angle 

434/Jackson modifications to ers on multiple y Crashes 

Lake Rd/CR roundabout 148) FC Agency 

656/Snap 

0013724 SR Pedestrians and 11 170000 170000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 State Pedestria Improve 

279 @ 11 bicyclists Pedestrian Numb (Secti Road and Highwa ns Pedestria 

Locs - signal - install new at ers on Locations y n Signals 

Pedestrian intersection 148) Agency and 

Upgrades Timing 

0013777 Roadway delineation 7 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 7 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013777 Roadway delineation 7 195247.3 195247.3 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 9 9 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 7 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013778 Roadway delineation 7 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 7 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013778 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

Roadway delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

7 

Numb 

ers 

264174.0 

6 

264174.0 

6 

HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

Multiple 

Road and 

Locations 

0 45 County 

Highwa 

y 

Roadway 

Departur 

e 

Minimize 

Severity 

of 

40 
 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 7 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013779 Roadway delineation 8 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 8 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013779 Roadway delineation 8 272624.3 272624.3 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 1 1 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 8 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013780 Roadway delineation 5 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 5 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013780 Roadway delineation 5 64771.05 64771.05 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 5 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013781 Roadway delineation 3 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 3 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

41 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

0013781 Roadway delineation 3 204427.3 204427.3 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 3 3 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 3 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013782 Roadway delineation 9 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013782 Roadway delineation 9 280361.8 280361.8 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 6 6 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013783 Roadway delineation 9 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013783 Roadway delineation 9 270426.4 270426.4 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 9 9 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013784 Roadway delineation 9 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

42 
 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013784 Roadway delineation 9 195529.1 195529.1 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 8 8 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013785 Roadway delineation 5 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 5 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013785 Roadway delineation 5 320899.5 320899.5 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 7 7 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 5 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013786 Roadway delineation 7 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 7 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013786 Roadway delineation 7 190864.7 190864.7 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 5 5 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 7 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013787 Roadway delineation 6 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

43 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 6 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013787 Roadway delineation 6 200729.6 200729.6 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 7 7 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 6 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013788 

Safety 

Project 

Identification 

& Evaluation 

Non-infrastructure 

Transportation safety 

planning 

1 

Numb 

ers 

1000000 1000000 HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

Includes 

All Roads 

0 45 Work 

on 

State 

and Off 

State 

Data Improve 

Crash 

Data 

Records 

and 

System Project 

Develop 

ment 

0013789 Roadway delineation 12 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 12 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013789 Roadway delineation 12 183811.6 183811.6 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 7 7 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 12 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013790 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

Roadway delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

25 

Numb 

ers 

25000 25000 HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

Multiple 

Road and 

Locations 

0 45 County 

Highwa 

y 

Roadway 

Departur 

e 

Minimize 

Severity 

of 

44 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

IMPROVEME 

NTS @ 25 

LOCS I 

148) Agency Roadway 

Departur 

e Crashes 

0013790 Roadway delineation 25 196440.0 196440.0 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 1 1 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 25 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013791 Roadway delineation 10 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 10 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013791 Roadway delineation 10 186881.2 186881.2 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 10 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013792 Roadway delineation 23 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 23 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013792 Roadway delineation 23 255784.3 255784.3 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 2 2 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 23 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

45 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

0013805 Roadway delineation 37 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 37 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013805 Roadway delineation 37 314090.5 314090.5 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 1 1 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 37 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013845 Roadway delineation 8 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 8 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013845 Roadway delineation 8 122594.1 122594.1 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 4 4 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 8 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013858 BCT Roadside Barrier end 1 500000 500000 HSIP Includes 0 0 State Roadway Minimize 

Guardrail treatments (crash Numb (Secti All Roads Highwa Departur Severity 

Anchor cushions, terminals) ers on y e of 

Replacement 148) Agency Roadway 

- PE Only Departur 

e Crashes 

0013865 Roadway delineation 14 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

46 
 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

NTS @ 14 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013865 Roadway delineation 14 393690.1 393690.1 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 7 7 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 14 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013866 Roadway delineation 9 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 CR Departur 

LOCS e Crashes 

0013866 Roadway delineation 9 260773.4 260773.4 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 7 7 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 CR Departur 

LOCS e Crashes 

0013867 Roadway delineation 9 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013867 Roadway delineation 9 132307.6 132307.6 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 8 8 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013868 Roadway delineation 9 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

47 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013868 Roadway delineation 9 221435.2 221435.2 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 5 5 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013869 Roadway delineation 10 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 10 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013869 Roadway delineation 10 241447.4 241447.4 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 7 7 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 10 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013870 Roadway delineation 21 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 21 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013870 Roadway delineation 21 542448.6 542448.6 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 8 8 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 21 Departur 

48 
 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013871 Roadway delineation 3 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 3 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013871 Roadway delineation 3 421248.7 421248.7 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 8 8 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 3 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013872 Roadway delineation 10 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 10 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013872 Roadway delineation 10 107082.5 107082.5 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 2 2 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 10 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013873 Roadway delineation 29 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 29 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013873 Roadway delineation 29 435525.5 435525.5 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 3 3 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

49 
 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 29 Departur 

LOCS I e Crashes 

0013874 Roadway delineation 9 25000 25000 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013874 Roadway delineation 9 324101.6 324101.6 HSIP Multiple 0 45 County Roadway Minimize 

OFF-SYSTEM Longitudinal pavement Numb 8 8 (Secti Road and Highwa Departur Severity 

SAFETY markings - remarking ers on Locations y e of 

IMPROVEME 148) Agency Roadway 

NTS @ 9 Departur 

LOCS IN e Crashes 

0013882 SR Intersection traffic 1 1250000 1250000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

197 @ SR control Modify control - Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

385 in modifications to ers on multiple y Severity 

Clarkesville roundabout 148) FC Agency at 

Intersecti 

ons 

0013883 SR Intersection traffic 8 600000 600000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

3/US 19 from control Intersection Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

CR 159/Big traffic control - other ers on multiple y Severity 

Creek Rd to 148) FC Agency at 

CS Intersecti 

ons 

0013884 SR Intersection traffic 6 500000 500000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

38/US 84 control Intersection Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

Median Turn traffic control - other ers on multiple y Severity 

Lanes from 148) FC Agency at 

Quitman Intersecti 

ons 

50 
 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

0013952 SR 7 Pedestrians and 2 200000 200000 HSIP Urban 1330 35 State Pedestria Improve 

Alt form CS bicyclists Miscellaneous Miles (Secti Minor 0 Highwa ns Safety for 

738/Ann St pedestrians and on Arterial y All 

to CS bicyclists 148) Agency Roadway 

1044/Geo Users 

0013953 SR 5 Roadway Roadway - 1 75000 75000 HSIP Urban 3200 45 State Pedestria Improve 

from SR 8 to other Numb (Secti Minor 0 Highwa ns Safety 

SR 280 ers on Arterial y For All 

148) Agency Road 

Users 

0013954 SR Roadway Roadway - 1 170000 170000 HSIP Urban 1810 45 State Pedestria Improve 

15 Alt/CR other Numb (Secti Minor 0 Highwa ns Safety 

1228 from ers on Arterial y For All 

Sunset Dr to 148) Agency Road 

South Users 

0013955 SR Intersection traffic 1 100000 100000 HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

10/US 78 @ control Intersection Numb (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

CR 166/Whit traffic control - other ers on multiple y Severity 

Davis Rd 148) FC Agency at 

Intersecti 

ons 

0013956 SR Access management 2 50555 50555 HSIP Urban 6670 45 State Intersecti Improve 

27/US 341 Access management - Miles (Secti Principal Highwa ons Safety for 

from CS other on Arterial - y All 

1005/Banbo 148) Other Agency Roadway 

o St to PR Users 

0014067 Non-infrastructure 1 635100 635100 HSIP Includes 0 45 Work Pedestria Improve 

Bicycle and Transportation safety Numb (Secti All Roads on ns Safe 

Pedestrian planning ers on State Walking 

Safety 148) and Off for 

Program State Pedestria 

Supp System ns 

0014083 SR Roadway signs and 4 192000 192000 HSIP Rural 2700 65 State Young Minimize 

51 
 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

22/US 80 traffic control Roadway Miles (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Adult Distracte 

from signs (including post) - on Arterial - y and d Driving 

Alabama new or updated 148) Interstate Agency Older 

State Line to Driver 

SR 

0014084 I-20 Roadway signs and 115 408000 408000 HSIP Rural 6010 65 State Young Minimize 

from Almon traffic control Roadway Miles (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Adult Distracte 

Rd to S. signs (including post) - on Arterial - y and d Driving 

Carolina new or updated 148) Interstate Agency Older 

State Li Driver 

0014085 I-85 Roadway signs and 56 360000 360000 HSIP Rural 5860 65 State Young Minimize 

from traffic control Roadway Miles (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Adult Distracte 

Alabama signs (including post) - on Arterial - y and d Driving 

State Line to new or updated 148) Interstate Agency Older 

Collinswor Driver 

0014086 I-75 Roadway signs and 104 1092000 1092000 HSIP Rural 5080 65 State Young Minimize 

from Florida traffic control Roadway Miles (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Adult Distracte 

State Line to signs (including post) - on Arterial - y and d Driving 

Farmers Ma new or updated 148) Interstate Agency Older 

Driver 

0014087 I-75 Roadway signs and 75 528000 528000 HSIP Rural 6840 65 State Young Minimize 

from Old traffic control Roadway Miles (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Adult Distracte 

Cherokee St signs (including post) - on Arterial - y and d Driving 

to Tennessee new or updated 148) Interstate Agency Older 

Sta Driver 

0014088 I- Roadway signs and 16 432000 432000 HSIP Rural 7040 65 State Young Minimize 

520 from I-20 traffic control Roadway Miles (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Adult Distracte 

East of signs (including post) - on Arterial - y and d Driving 

Augusta to I- new or updated 148) Interstate Agency Older 

20 We Driver 

0014089 I185 SR 1/US 

27/Victory 

Roadway signs and 

traffic control Roadway 

signs (including post) -

46 

Miles 

420000 420000 HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

1980 

0 

65 State 

Highwa 

y 

Young 

Adult 

and 

Minimize 

Distracte 

d Driving 

52 
 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Drive to I-85 

in 

new or updated 148) Interstate Agency Older 

Driver 

0014090 I-75 Roadway signs and 103 336000 336000 HSIP Rural 4550 65 State Young Minimize 

from SR 215 traffic control Roadway Miles (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Adult Distracte 

in Dooly signs (including post) - on Arterial - y and d Driving 

County to new or updated 148) Interstate Agency Older 

Bill G Driver 

0014091 I- Roadway signs and 10 336000 336000 HSIP Rural 7240 65 State Young Minimize 

675 from I-75 traffic control Roadway Miles (Secti Principal 0 Highwa Adult Distracte 

to I-285 signs (including post) - on Arterial - y and d Driving 

including new or updated 148) Interstate Agency Older 

ramps t Driver 

232330- SR Intersection geometry 1 2130136. 2130136. HSIP Intersecti 0 45 State Intersecti Reduce 

36 @ CR Intersection geometrics Numb 3 3 (Secti on of Highwa ons Crash 

181/FLAT - ers on multiple y Severity 

SHOALS/STE miscellaneous/other/un 148) FC Agency at 

ELE RD & CR specified Intersecti 

ons 

M005115 SR 

21 From SR 

204 to SR 25 

Roadway Pavement 

surface - high friction 

surface 

8 

Miles 

5427871. 

46 

5427871. 

46 

HSIP 

(Secti 

on 

148) 

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other 

Freeways 

and 

3220 

0 

50 State 

Highwa 

y 

Agency 

Roadway 

Departur 

e 

Reduce 

Roadway 

Departur 

e Crash 

Severity 

Expressw 

ays 

53 
 

Overview of General Safety Trends 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Progress in Achieving Safety Performance Targets 

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the state for the past five years. 

Performance Measures* 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 

Number of fatalities 1388.2 1298.2 1233.6 1207.8 1244.2 

Number of serious injuries 17537.6 16400.6 15584.6 15258.8 15470.4 

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 1.26 1.19 1.13 1.1 1.12 

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 15.92 15.07 14.31 13.96 13.98 

*Performance measure data is presented using a five-year rolling average. 

54 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

55 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

56 
 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

To the maximum extent possible, present performance measure* data by functional classification and ownership. 

Year - 2015 

Function Classification 

URBAN PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - OTHER 

FREEWAYS AND 

EXPRESSWAYS 

URBAN PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 

URBAN LOCAL ROAD 

OR STREET 

URBAN MAJOR 

COLLECTOR 

URBAN PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - OTHER 

RURAL PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 

URBAN MINOR 

ARTERIAL 

RURAL PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - OTHER 

Number of fatalities 

10.8 

99.2 

122.8 

54.2 

156 

75.4 

184.4 

96.4 

Number of serious injuries 

170.4 

1451.4 

1875.2 

888 

2730.2 

603.4 

3158.8 

855.2 

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 

0.33 

0.48 

0.63 

0.96 

1.15 

0.92 

1.21 

1.56 

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 

5.33 

7.07 

9.76 

16.23 

20.85 

7.83 

20.84 

14.28 

57 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

RURAL LOCAL ROAD OR 

STREET 

97.4 886.2 2.02 19.6 

RURAL MINOR 

ARTERIAL 

139.8 1204.8 2.39 21.32 

RURAL MAJOR 

COLLECTOR 

170.2 1339.2 6.42 63.45 

58 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

59 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

60 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

61 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

62 
 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Year - 2015
 

Roadway Ownership 

STATE HIGHWAY AGENCY 

COUNTY HIGHWAY AGENCY 

TOWN OR TOWNSHIP HIGHWAY 

AGENCY 

COUNTY HIGHWAY AGENCY 

CITY OF MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY 

AGENCY 

Number of 

fatalities 

750.4 

341.6 

151.6 

341.6 

151.6 

Number of serious 

injuries 

9107.6 

4276.6 

2086.2 

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT) 

1.12 

1.15 

1.13 

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT) 

13.62 

14.39 

15.51 

63 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

64 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

65 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

66 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

67 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

68 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Describe any other aspects of the general highway safety trends on which you would like to elaborate. 

Georgia, like many other state saw a considerable increase in motor vehicle fatalities. We have updated 

our HSIP program guidance and provided the document to our regional FHWA office. We are hopeful 

that the program modifications will help to stem the rise in fatalities. Upon review and final input from 

FHWA regional office we will advance the recommendations outlined within the document. 

Application of Special Rules 

Present the rate of traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and pedestrians over the 

age of 65. 

Older Driver 

Performance Measures 

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 

Fatality rate (per capita) 0.22 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.16 

Serious injury rate (per 

capita) 

1.65 1.48 1.41 1.31 1.21 

Fatality and serious injury 

rate (per capita) 

1.87 1.68 1.6 1.49 1.37 

*Performance measure data is presented using a five-year rolling average. 

(F+SI 65+ 2011/2011 population figure)+(F+SI 65+ 2010/2010 pop. Figure)+...../5 equation and it looks 

like this: 

2008 - 2012 

(1.804679552 + 1.712166172 + 1.70696325 + 1.435873606 + 1.349429324) / 5) = 1.804679552 

2010-2014 

(1.70696325 + 1.435873606 + 1.349429324 + 1.217464316 + 1.14011209) / 5) = 1.70696325 

69 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Does the older driver special rule apply to your state? 

No 

Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Improvements (Program 

Evaluation) 

70 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

What indicators of success can you use to demonstrate effectiveness and success in the Highway 

Safety Improvement Program? 

Other-GDOT has a growing safety culure. Each district engineer and senior staff engineer has a 

performance measure tied to minimizing fatalities and serious injuries 

What significant programmatic changes have occurred since the last reporting period? 

Organizational Changes 

Briefly describe significant program changes that have occurred since the last reporting period. 

To help improve safety project delivery, GDOT Office of Traffic Operations has added a new position 

along with a support staff engineer. This new position is responsible for shortening the plan 

development program duration. By accelerating delivery, we hope to get safety projects built sooner 

and provide the highest level of service to our customers. 

71 
 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

SHSP Emphasis Areas 

For each SHSP emphasis area that relates to the HSIP, present trends in emphasis area performance measures. 

Year - 2015 

HSIP-related SHSP 

Emphasis Areas 

Lane Departure 

Roadway Departure 

Intersections 

Pedestrians 

Bicyclists 

Older Drivers 

Motorcyclists 

Work Zones 

Data 

Target 

Crash Type 

Number of 

fatalities 

186.8 

128.4 

541 

148.8 

16.6 

173.8 

139.6 

33.4 

1243.6 

Number of 

serious injuries 

801.6 

503.8 

2818.4 

303.6 

41.6 

245.2 

419.6 

146 

5823.2 

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT) 

Serious injury rate 

(per HMVMT) 

0.17 0.71 

0.12 0.45 

0.49 2.48 

0.13 0.27 

0.02 0.04 

0.16 0.22 

0.13 0.37 

0.03 0.13 

1.12 5.11 

Other1 Other2 Other3 

72 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

73 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

74 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

75 
 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Groups of similar project types 

76 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Present the overall effectiveness of groups of similar types of projects. 

Year - 2015 

HSIP Sub-program 

Types 

Target 

Crash Type 

Bicycle Safety 

Median Barrier 

Left Turn Crash 

Safe Corridor 

Intersection 

Roadway Departure 

Crash Data 

Pedestrian Safety 

Right Angle Crash 

Horizontal Curve 

Skid Hazard 

Red Light Running 

Prevention 

Number of 

fatalities 

16.6 

5.2 

108 

908.6 

541 

128.4 

1243.6 

148.8 

28.8 

395.8 

5.6 

20.2 

Number of 

serious injuries 

41.6 

14.4 

411 

4143.6 

2905.4 

508 

5823.2 

307.8 

82.6 

814.2 

20.8 

54.8 

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT) 

0.02 

0.1 

0.82 

0.49 

0.12 

1.12 

0.13 

0.03 

0.36 

0.01 

0.02 

Serious injury rate 

(per HMVMT) 

0.04 

0.01 

0.36 

3.6 

2.56 

0.46 

5.11 

0.27 

0.07 

0.71 

0.02 

0.05 

Other1 Other2 Other3 

77 
 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Systemic Treatments 

Present the overall effectiveness of systemic treatments. 

Year - 2015 

Systemic improvement 

Install/Improve Pavement 

Marking and/or Delineation 

Cable Median Barriers 

Other-High Friction Surface 

Treatment 

Target 

Crash 

Type 

Number of 

fatalities 

186.8 

12.2 

128.4 

Number of 

serious 

injuries 

801.6 

70 

508 

Fatality rate 

(per HMVMT) 

0.16 

0.01 

0.12 

Serious injury 

rate (per 

HMVMT) 

0.68 

0.06 

0.46 

Other1 Other2 Other3 

78 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Describe any other aspects of the overall Highway Safety Improvement Program effectiveness on 

which you would like to elaborate. 

The state continues to aggressively promote highway safety through education, emergency response, 

enforcement and engineering. GDOT worked closely with our Governor’s Office of Highway Safety to 

complete the 2015 SHSP. As part of this process we updated our goals for pedestrian, intersection, lanedeparture and bicycle safety. To support this effort we examined our implementation plans. All of the 

plans are nearing final revision. This work has led us to further promote effective countermeasures. 

Over the year we worked with our maintenance office to develop the steps and processes to ensure the 

implementation plan countermeasures are incorporated as needed into our resurfacing projects. Safety 

edge, rumble strips, signs, shoulder improvements and pavement markings will be reviewed and added 

as needed. Additionally, the state continues the median cable barrier installation program by 

identifying the next segments for treatment on our state highways. The Interstate corridors and 

freeways that showed the occurrence of median crossovers were identified and prioritized. Going 

forward, we will continue to target limited access facilities and other applicable divided highways to 

install cable barriers. We have also worked through the process to identify and locate sub-standard 

guardrail end treatments. These locations have been programed for design and construction. Also, we 

worked with our office of utilities to identify utility pole crash locations. Several locations have been 

identified and the relocation projects are being programmed. 

79 
 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Project Evaluation 

Provide project evaluation data for completed projects (optional). 

Location Functional 

Class 

Improvement 

Category 

Improvement 

Type 

BefFatal BefSerious 

Injury 

Bef-All 

Injuries 

BefPDO BefTotal AftFatal AftSerious 

Injury 

Aft-All 

Injuries 

AftPDO AftTotal Evaluation 

Results 

(Benefit/ Cost 

Ratio) 

No 

elaboration 

at this time. 

80 
2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Optional Attachments 

Sections Files Attached 

Progress in Achieving Safety Performance HSIP_Q27_upload_Template_Older.xlsx 

Targets: Application of Special Rules 

81 
 

 

 

 

2016 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Glossary
 

5 year rolling average means the average of five individual, consecutive annual points of data (e.g. 

annual fatality rate).
 

Emphasis area means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven,
 

collaborative process.
 

Highway safety improvement project means strategies, activities and projects on a public road that are
 

consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous road location
 

or feature or addresses a highway safety problem.
 

HMVMT means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.
 

Non-infrastructure projects are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities,
 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement
 

activities.
 

Older driver special rule applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which data
 

are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance dated
 

February 13, 2013.
 

Performance measure means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to monitor
 

changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and objectives.
 

Programmed funds mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation
 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.
 

Roadway Functional Classification means the process by which streets and highways are grouped into
 

classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.
 

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on safety
 

data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148. 

Systematic refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across a 

system.
 

Systemic safety improvement means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high risk
 

roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types. 

Transfer means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an
 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal
 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.
 

82