alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (4)(b)(vii)



 
Exhibit (4)(b)(vii)

 
GE LIFE AND ANNUITY ASSURANCE COMPANY

VESTED GUARANTEED MINIMUM INCOME PAYMENT ENDORSEMENT 
 

 
The
Contract to which this endorsement is attached is amended by adding the following provision to the Purchase Payments section immediately after the Scheduled Installment provision: 
 
Vested Guaranteed Minimum Income Payment 
 
A Default occurs when either: 

	  	 (1)	 More than 24 Scheduled Installments are paid outside of the grace period over the life of your Contract; or 


	  	 (2)	 A Scheduled Installment, interest that is charged on it and any monthly billing fee are not paid within one year from the Scheduled Installment’s Monthly Due Date.


 
If a Default occurs, the Guaranteed Minimum Income Payment
shown on the Contract data pages is forfeited; however, you will be entitled to a reduced Guaranteed Minimum Income Payment. 
 
On the date of Default, provided Default occurs after 60 Scheduled Installments have been paid, the vested Guaranteed Minimum Income Payment will be (a) divided by
(b) multiplied by (c), where: 

	  	 (a)	 is the total Scheduled Installments paid into the Subaccount and not previously withdrawn prior to the date of Default; 


	  	 (b)	 is the total Scheduled Installments that are required to be paid into the Subaccount prior to the Annuity Commencement Date to secure the Guaranteed Minimum Income Payment
shown on the Contract data pages; and 


	  	 (c)	 is the Guaranteed Minimum Income Payment shown on the Contract data pages. 

 
Restrictions concerning the reduced Guaranteed Minimum Income Payment are as follows: 

	  	 •	 Once the reduced Guaranteed Minimum Income Payment has been determined, we will not recalculate it again even if subsequent Purchase Payments are made; and



	  	 •	 Once a Default has occurred and the reduced Guaranteed Minimum Income Payment has been determined, if a withdrawal is taken from the Subaccount and not repaid with interest
within one year of the date of withdrawal, then the reduced Guaranteed Minimum Income Payment is forfeited. 

 
For GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company, 
 
/s/    PAMELA S. SCHUTZ 
Pamela S. Schutz 
        President
#### CONE BROTHERS CONTRACTING and Employers Service Corporation, Petitioners, v. Moses MEEKINS et al., Respondents.

No. 41070.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 28, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Ralph PERROTTA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-56.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 17, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Hooker Furniture Corporation (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, E. Larry Ryder, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                           
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: October 10, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ E. Larry Ryder                        
|                       |  |     |  | E. Larry Ryder                            
|                       |  |     |  | Executive Vice President - Finance and    
|                       |  |     |  | Administration and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 11
                               AGEMARK CORPORATION

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED            SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                MARCH 31,                    MARCH 31,
                                                       --------------------------   --------------------------
                                                           1999          1998           1999          1998
                                                       ------------  ------------   ------------  ------------
<S>                                                      <C>                 <C>      <C>                 <C>
Weighted average common shares actually outstanding      1,000,000           200      1,000,000           200

Stock options issued
January 1, 1999 at $1.10 per share                         166,666             -        166,666
January 1, 1999 at $1.00 per share                          43,750             -         43,750
                                                         ---------                    ---------
Total shares subject to options                            210,416             -        210,416             -

Total assumed proceeds of exercise                      $  227,083    $        -     $  227,083    $        -

Number of shares assumed purchased at 5.97/share (1)        38,037             -         38,037             -

Net shares assumed issued at January 1, 1999               172,379             -        172,379             -

Weighted average common shares assumed outstanding for   1,172,379           200      1,086,189           200
   period

</TABLE>

____________________

(1)  There is no market for the Company's shares. For computational purposes the
     value assumed is the September 30, 1998 book value per share.

                                      -13-
Order entered July 26, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00445-CV

GEORGE MORRIS, Appellant

V.

SOUTHERN JOURNEYS OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 007-02709-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 24, 2017 motion for an extension of time to file a 

brief. We GRANT the motion. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appellant on 

July 24, 2017 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000949 05-AUG-2019 07:48 AM
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53661-53662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-309]


Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation; Maine Yankee Atomic Power 
Company; Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station; Notice of Public Meeting to 
Receive Comment on Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public 
meeting to receive comments on the Post-Shutdown Decommissioning 
Activities Report (PSDAR) for the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station 
(Maine Yankee) located in Lincoln County, Maine. The meeting will be 
held on November 6, 1997, beginning at 7:00 p.m. at the Wiscasset 
Senior High School in Wiscasset, Maine. The purpose of this 
informational meeting is

[[Page 53662]]

to (1) describe the licensee's planned activities, (2) describe the 
regulatory process for decommissioning, (3) hear public comments 
regarding health and safety, and protection of the environment during 
decommissioning, and (4) provide an opportunity for State and local 
representatives to participate. The licensee will discuss their plans 
to decommission the Maine Yankee facility. The NRC will discuss the 
PSDAR and the license termination process, and describe the program for 
future plant oversight. The public will have an opportunity to comment 
on the PSDAR and the meeting will be transcribed by a court reporter. 
Notice of receipt of and availability for public comment of the Maine 
Yankee PSDAR was published in the Federal Register on September 19, 
1997 (62 FR 49261). Prior to the public meeting, comments regarding the 
Maine Yankee PSDAR may be submitted in writing to Mr. Michael Webb, 
Mail Stop 11-B-20, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20555.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of October 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ronald B. Eaton,
Acting Director, Project Directorate I-3, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-27236 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Order entered August 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00840-CV

RICK MILTEER, Appellant

V.

PARK VENTURE ENDOSCOPY CENTER L.L.C., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-18465

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 14, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file 

the jurisdictional letter brief requested by this Court. We GRANT the motion and extend the 

time to September 3, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3319 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3319

 To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to address entities that 
are not considered to be investment companies for the purposes of that 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2023

 Mr. Moran (for himself, Mr. Warner, and Mr. Scott of South Carolina) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to address entities that 
are not considered to be investment companies for the purposes of that 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding American Entrepreneurship 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

    Section 3(c)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 
80a-3(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), in the first 
        sentence, by striking ``250 persons'' and inserting ``500 
        persons''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$50,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Selma Kaufmann et al., as Executors of Berthe Wyler, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

November 7, 1952.

*Robert Ferret*for executors, petitioners.

*Netter é Netter*for Walter Evans and others, respondents.

Collins, S.

The uncontroverted facts submitted on the question of the construction of decedent’s will are that, at the time of the execution of her will and at the time of her death, testatrix held certain real property through her ownership of all the stock of a realty corporation but at neither of these times was title to any real property in her own name. Testatrix inaccurately advised the draftsman of her will that she was the owner of the real property which she in fact owned only through her shares in the corporation.

The second article of the will provides: “ I give, devise and bequeath any real property owned by me ”. The court construes the second article of decedent’s will as effecting a bequest of the stock of the realty corporation wholly owned by testatrix. “ What she intended to bequeath was the stock of the realty corporation which she owned, not to devise realty which she did not own. It is the substance of the attempted gift with which we are chiefly concerned, not the words in which it was attempted to be given.” *(Matter of Cartledge,*118 Misc. 131, 133, affd. 203 App. Div. 899, affd. 236 N. Y. 515; see, also, *Matter of Manning,*196 App. Div. 575, affd. 232 N. Y. 512; *Matter of Ferguson,*194 Misc. 840; *Matter of Kheel,*52 N. Y. S. 2d 820; *Karp.*v. *Twenty-Three Thirty Ryer Corp.,*55 N. Y. S. 2d 856.)

Submit decree on notice construing the will and settling the account.
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of The Town and Country Trust (the "Trust")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer of the Trust does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Trust.


/s/ Harvey Schulweis
---------------------------
Harvey Schulweis
Chief Executive Officer of
The Town and Country Trust

March 2, 2005
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification      Pursuant to**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

**(as      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of**

**the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the                period                covered by the Report and the results of operations of the Company                for the                period covered by the Report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Donald R. Katz                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  |                  Donald R. Katz                                                                                                                                  |
| Title: |                  Chief Executive Officer and  Chairman                of the Board of Directors  (Principal                Executive Office) |
| Date:  |   August                8, 2007                                                                                                                             |

----
The Attorney General of Texas 

October 4, 1979 

MARK WiiltE 

Attorney Qeneml 

4sN rIben. An., suite lso 

El PW. TX. wsos 

0ws13-34M 

Dr. Kenneth II. Ashwath 

Coordinating Board 

Texas College and University System 

P. 0. Box 12788, Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas 787ll 

Opinion No. MW-64 

Re: Authority of governing board 

to change name of statutorily 

authorized institutions of higher 

education. 

Dear Dr. Ashwath: 

You inquire about the authority of governing boards and the 

Coordinating Board, Texas College and Unfverslty System, to rename 

statutorily authorized institutions of higher education. 

The names of the institutions about which you inquire are established 

by statute. We belleve an administrative body lacks authority to chaige a 

statutorily established name. An administrative agency has only those 

powers expressly conferred by statute or .implIed therefrom. Stauffer v. 

City of San Antonio, 344 S.W.2d 158 (Tex. 198ll. It may not promulgate rules 

that conflict with general law. State v. Jackson, 378 S.W.2d 341 (Tex. 1984); 

see also Brown Bxpreor, Inc. v. Railroad Commission, 415 S.W.2d 394 (Tex. 

=82 ” 

IIY Industrial Accident Board, 358 S.W.2d 874 (Tex. Civ. App. - 

, writ ref%B. The legislature has amen&d the Education Code on 

numerous occasions to change the name of a state college or university. 

See, e.g., Educ. Code S 87.001 (Tarleton State University); S 87.101 (Prairie 

View A&M Unlversityk S 104.01 (University System of South Texas); 9 ll3.01 

(Texas Eastern University). See also Attorney General Opinions WW-1035 

(198B (name of the “Agricultural and Mechanical Collage of Texas” may be 

changed by act of the legislature and does not require constitutional 

amendment); WW-473 (1958) (water control and improvement district may 

not change its name). ‘We find no provision expressly authorizing the 

Coordinating Board cr the Regents of the various colleges and universities to 

change the name of an institution under their jurisdiction. Accordingly, the 

statutorily established name of a state-supported college or university may 

not be changed in the absence of authority granted by the legislature. 

SUMMARY 

The Coordinating Board and the governing boards of 

state-supported colleges and universities may not 

P. 199 
Dr. Kenneth II. Ashworth - Page TWO (Mw-641 

change the legislatively established name of an institution under H their jurisdiction. 

vwLrz 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General of Texas 

JOHN W. PAINTER, JR. 

First Assistant Attorney General 

TED L. HARTLEY 

Executive Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by Susan Garrison 

Assistant Attorney General % 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

C. Robert Heath, Chairman 

David B. Brooks 

Susan Garrison 

Rick Gilpin 

William G Reid 

Bruce Youngblood 

Lonny Zwiener 

p. 20.0
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53823-53824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Partnership Council Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense.


[[Page 53824]]


ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense (DOD) announces a meeting of the 
Defense Partnership Council. Notice of this meeting is required under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This meeting is open to the public. 
The topics to be covered will include the Alternative Personnel System 
concept and other matters related to the enhancement of Labor-
Management Partnerships throughout DOD.

DATES: The meeting is to be held November 19, 1997, in room 1E801, 
Conference Room 7, the Pentagon, from 1 p.m. until 3 p.m. Comments 
should be received by November 12, 1997, in order to be considered at 
the November 19 meeting.

ADDRESSES: We invite interested persons and organizations to submit 
written comments or recommendations. Mail or deliver your comments or 
recommendations to Mr. Kenneth Oprisko at the address shown below. 
Seating is limited and available on a first-come, first-serve basis. 
Individuals wishing to attend who do not possess an appropriate 
Pentagon building pass should call the below listed telephone number to 
obtain instructions for entry into the Pentagon. Handicapped 
individuals wishing to attend should also call the below listed 
telephone number to obtain appropriate accommodations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Kenneth Oprisko, Chief, Labor 
Relations Branch, Field Advisory Services Division, Defense Civilian 
Personnel Management Service, 1400 Key Blvd, Suite B-200, Arlington, VA 
22209-5144, 696-6301, ext. 704.

    Dated: October 9, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-27315 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### Carolyn Riley Sharp DAVIDSON v. Raymond F. SHARP, on behalf of Rebecca D. Sharp.

No. 50130.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 25, 1978.

Patricia Champagne, Gulfport, for appellant.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT
      32**
















**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**




















The
      certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
      15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section 1350 of
      Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Derick Sinclair, the Chief
      Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
      of
      Tactical Air Defense Services ,Inc. hereby certifies that:





1.
      the
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tactical Air
      Defense Services, Inc.








TACTICAL
      AIR DEFENSE SERVICES, INC., Registrant





Dated:
      August 12, 2006       /s/
      Derick
      Sinclair





By:
      Derick Sinclair, President,
      Chief Executive Officer, T reasuer,
      Chief Financial Officer,


Principal
      Accounting Officer
      and Director