alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (p)(2)

**THE CODE OF ETHICS**

**OF**

**NORTHERN TRUST INVESTMENTS, N.A.**

 

This Code of Ethics (the “Code”) has been adopted by Northern Trust Investments, N.A. (“NTI”) in compliance with Rule 17j-1(c)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) and Rule 204A-1 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”).

 

The purpose of the Code is to establish general principles governing the conduct of NTI employees in connection with NTI’s services as an investment adviser and to establish procedures to enhance compliance with those general principles.

 

| **I.** | **General Principles** |
|--------|------------------------|

 

These principles emphasize NTI’s fiduciary duty to clients and the obligation of NTI employees to uphold that fundamental duty.

 

All NTI directors, officers and employees are subject to the following:

 

|   | A. | The duty at all times to place the interests of clients first; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | B. | The requirement that all personal securities transactions be conducted in such a manner as to be consistent with this Code and to avoid any actual or potential conflict of interest or any abuse of an employee’s position of trust and responsibility; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | C. | The principle that NTI employees should not take inappropriate advantage of their positions; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | D. | The fiduciary principle that information concerning the identity of security holdings and financial circumstances of clients is confidential; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | E. | The principle that independence in the investment decision-making process is paramount; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | F. | The duty to preserve NTI’s reputation for honesty, integrity, and professionalism. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

These general principles govern the conduct of all directors, officers, and employees of NTI, whether or not the conduct also is covered by more specific standards and procedures set forth below.

 

Failure to comply with this Code may result in disciplinary action, including termination of employment.

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.2

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Mark Scott, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];
      and

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2005                      /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR




RULE
      15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Pangea Petroleum Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
      Duncan, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date: May15, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/ Scott DuncanScott
                DuncanChief
                Financial Officer andPrincipal
                Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27209]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as 
Amended

    Consistent with Departmental policy, 28 CFR Sec. 50.7, 38 FR 19029, 
and 42 U.S.C. Sec. 9622(d), notice is hereby given that on September 
29, 1997, a proposed consent decree in United States v. John Reardon 
and Paul Reardon, Civil Action No. 97-12197-T, was lodged with the 
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The 
proposed Consent Decree will resolve the United States' claims under 
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability 
Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 9601 et seq., on behalf of the U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'') against defendants John 
Reardon and Paul Reardon relating to the Norwood PCB Superfund Site 
(``Site'') in Norwood, Massachusetts. The Complaint alleges that the 
Reardons are liable under Sections 107(a)(1) and (a)(2) of CERCLA, 42 
U.S.C. Sec. 9607(a)(1) and (a)(2).
    Pursuant to the Consent Decree, the Reardons will provide access to 
the portion of the Site under their ownership and control, and will 
impose institutional controls as their property to ensure the 
effectiveness of the remedial action at the Site. The United States 
will also recover response costs in the amount of $25,000 pursuant to 
the Consent Decree.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Any comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should 
refer to United States v. John Reardon and Paul Reardon, Civil Action 
No. 97-12197-T, D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-372B.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, District of Massachusetts, J.W. McCormack Post 
Office and Courthouse, Boston, Massachusetts, 02109, at Region I, 
Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, One Congress Street, 
Boston, Massachusetts, 02203 and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G 
Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy 
of the proposed consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail 
from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check 
(there is a 25 cent per page reproduction cost) in the amount of $18.25 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Bruce S. Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-27209 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.80.1
                                                                 ---------------

                        AMENDED MANAGEMENT RETENTION PLAN

Synbiotics Corporation is implementing a "management retention plan" designed to
encourage you to remain am employee of the Company between now and the potential
sale of the Animal Health Business. The Management Retention Plan consists of a
cash or stock bonus and special treatment of outstanding stock options and
restricted stock. This Management Retention Plan does not alter or affect
existing Synbiotics employee benefit plans, the Special Payment Plan or existing
employee agreements.

To qualify for the Management Retention Plan, you must be an active employee,
who is employed on the day of the sale of the Animal Health Business, provided
that you have not notified the Company of your intent to resign your employment
with Synbiotics. This Management Retention Plan does not apply to:

1)   Employees who voluntarily leave the Company prior to the sale of the Animal
     Health Business

2)   Employees whose employment is terminated prior to the sale of the Animal
     Health Business

3)   Employees of W3COMMERCE

4)   Active employees who are offered and accept continued employment with the
     Company following the sale of the Animal Health Business.

Cash Bonus

A cash bonus payment (or you can elect to receive the cash bonus in stock - see
below) will be made on the day following the sale of the Animal Health Business.
The bonus payment will depend on the ultimate sales price of the Animal Health
Business and will be paid as a percentage of annual base salary ("the
Percentage"). In no event will the Percentage payment be less than 50.0% of an
employee's annual base salary and there is no maximum percentage. The Percentage
will be calculated as 1.25 times the sales price of the Animal Health Business.

Examples:

         If the sales price of the Animal Health Business were $35 million, then
35 times 1.25 would yield a Percentage of 43.75%. You would receive a cash bonus
of 43.75% of your annual salary.


<PAGE>

        If the sales price of the Animal Health Business were $60 million then
60 times 1.25 would yield a Percentage of 75%. You would receive a cash bonus of
75% of your annual salary.

Restricted Stock and Stock Options

All of your unvested restricted stock and stock options will become fully vested
on the day following the sale of the Animal Health Business and you will receive
two years following the sale of the Animal Health Business to exercise any
unexercised stock options.



/s/ Kenneth M. Cohen
---------------------------
Kenneth M. Cohen
President and CEO
Synbiotics Corporation



I have read the above Management Retention Plan.
Acknowledged and accepted:

/s/ Michael K. Green
---------------------------
Michael K. Green

January 18, 2001
---------------------------
Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO OF HUNTCO INC. AT AND FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                              414
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                    42,159
<ALLOWANCES>                        324
<INVENTORY>                      77,832
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                122,461
<PP&E>                          168,114
<DEPRECIATION>                   44,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  256,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            46,184
<BONDS>                         105,470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                       4,500
<COMMON>                             90
<OTHER-SE>                       99,324
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    256,734
<SALES>                         349,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                349,947
<CGS>                           332,215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   332,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    241
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               10,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (13,190)
<INCOME-TAX>                     (4,687)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (8,503)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  (2,644)
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                    (11,147)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (1.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (1.27)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As
Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert B. Stearns, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Quepasa Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | That the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |        |  |                         
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 15, 2007 |  |  |  |        |  | /s/    Robert B. Stearns
|                    |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Robert B. Stearns       
|                    |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chairman and            
|                    |  |  |  |        |  | Chief Executive Officer
Order filed January 26, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00430-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF L.A.V. AND S.H.V., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-03748J

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed October 25, 2021. Our review has determined 

that relevant items have been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P.

34.5(c). The record does not contain the following orders, which are noted on the 

clerk’s docket sheet:

• Order signed October 1, 2020 Setting Hearing

• Order signed October 1, 2020 Retaining Case on Docket

• Order signed January 11, 2021 Granting Continuance
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record on or before February 2, 2022, containing the above listed items.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
#### W. E. DEACON and Helen E. Deacon, Petitioners, v. POLK COUNTY, Respondent.

No. 71-51.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 7, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BENJAMIN R. GEER, JR., )

)

Petitioner, )

) Case No. 1:06-cv-38-SJM-SPB

v. )

)

SUPERINTENDENT NISH, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on 

February 17, 2006 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise 

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on December 3, 2010 

[33], recommends that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied and that a 

certificate of appealability also be denied. The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days 

from the date of service in which to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by 

certified mail at SCI Waymart, where he is incarcerated, and on Respondents. 

Petitioner’s objections [34] were filed on December 22, 2010. After de novo review of 

Case 1:06-cv-00038-SJM-SPB Document 35 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation 

and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2011;

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be, and 

hereby is DENIED. Inasmuch as jurists of reason would not find it debatable whether 

the instant petition is untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) and/or whether the 

Petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, IT IS 

FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter dated 

December 3, 2010 [33] is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/

SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN

Sean J. McLaughlin 

United States District Judge

Cm: All parties of record.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter

Case 1:06-cv-00038-SJM-SPB Document 35 Filed 01/06/11 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to his knowledge:



1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



|Date:     December 2, 2013 | By: | /s/ Philippe Van Acker
|-------------------------- | --- | ----------------------
|                           |     | Name:                 
|                           |     | Title:                
|                           |     |
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3092 

To clarify certain regulations to allow for the installation of pulsating light 

systems for high-mounted stop lamps, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2023 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To clarify certain regulations to allow for the installation 

of pulsating light systems for high-mounted stop lamps, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Collision Avoidance 

5 Systems Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAR-END COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3092 IS

1 (1) PULSATING LIGHT SYSTEM.—The term 

2 ‘‘pulsating light system’’ means a system for a high3 mounted stop lamp in which— 

4 (A) when the brake of the vehicle is ap5 plied, the lamp pulses rapidly not more than 4 

6 times and for not more than 1.2 seconds, after 

7 which the lamp converts to a continuous light 

8 as a normal stop lamp until the time the brake 

9 is released; and 

10 (B) the pulses described in subparagraph 

11 (A) may not repeat on a subsequent application 

12 of the brake of the vehicle for a lock-out period 

13 of at least 5 seconds after the release of the 

14 brake described in that subparagraph. 

15 (2) STANDARD 108.—The term ‘‘Standard 108’’ 

16 means Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard Num17 ber 108, contained in section 571.108 of title 49, 

18 Code of Federal Regulations (or a successor regula19 tion). 

20 (b) CLARIFICATION ON PULSATING LIGHT SYS21 TEMS.—Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, 

22 Standard 108 shall be deemed to allow for the use of pul23 sating light systems on vehicles covered by Standard 108. 

24 (c) RULEMAKING.—Not later than 180 days after the 

25 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of TransporVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:35 Oct 20, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3092.IS S3092

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3092 IS

1 tation shall promulgate such regulations as are necessary 

2 to update Standard 108— 

3 (1) to include performance-based standards for 

4 pulsating light systems; and 

5 (2) to allow for the use of pulsating light sys6 tems on motor vehicles covered by Standard 108. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS