alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p. 1 

## PICK-UPDATE : 3/15/200 7 BO X O F 

# 3 0 Step2 : FO RASR C INTERNA

L US E ONL Y (PAR TB o fB )



## EP ADOCKE TID : 102RQ-R N 1 ) 102RQ-RN-5-1 6 3 ) 102RQ-RN-5-1 8 5 ) 102RQ-RN-5-2 0 7 ) 102RQ-RN-5-2 2 9 ) 102RQ-RN-5-2 4 11 ) 102RQ-RN-5-2 6 13) 102RQ-RN-5-2 8 15 ) 102RQ-RN-5-3 0 17) 102RQ-RN-6- 1 19 ) 102RQ-RN-6- 3 21 ) 102RQ-RN-6- 5 23 ) 102RQ-RN-6- 7 25 ) 102RQ-RN-6- 9 27 ) 102RQ-RN-6-1 1 29 ) 102RQ-RN-6-1 3 31 ) 102RQ-RN-6-1 5 33 ) 102RQ-RN-6-1 7 35 ) 102RQ-RN-6-1 9 37 ) 102RQ-RN-6-2 1 39 ) 102RQ-RN-6-2 3 Ste p 3 : FO R ASR C INTERNA LUS E ONL Y CD : OA : / 

## 2 ) 102RQ-RN-5-1 7 4 ) 102RQ-RN-5-1 9 6 ) 102RQ-RN-5-2 1 8 ) 102RQ-RN-5-2 3 10) 102RQ-RN-5-2 5 12 ) 102RQ-RN-5-2 7 14) 102RQ-RN-5-2 9 16) (i02RQ-RN-5-32 ^ 18 ) 102RQ-RN-6- 2 20 ) 102RQ-RN-6- 4 22 ) 102RQ-RN-6- 6 24 ) 102RQ-RN-6- 8 26 ) 102RQ-RN-6-1 0 28 ) 102RQ-RN-6-1 2 30 ) 102RQ-RN-6-1 4 32 ) 102RQ-RN-6-1 6 34 ) 102RQ-RN-6-1 8 36 ) 102RQ-RN-6-2 0 38 ) 102RQ-RN-6-2 2 40 ) 102RQ-RN-6-2 4

Ste p 1 : FOR ASR

C INTERNA LUS E ONL Y^^^ Are ther e more documents fo rthi s Docke t i n anothe rbox ? *YE S //NO / *Fil l ou t Continuatio n Shee t an d go t o Ste p 2 Interna l SFUN D Bo

xNumbe r3 6 O F _28 3 Initials/Date : _LDS_/_3-15-2007

_Q 

# -M, P ' /O^l.fiL-RM-G-3 ^
/ ' / UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y P. 2

- ^TM____ - * WASHINGTON , D.C

. 2046 0 Vp„0^ 0 JU L1 0 198 8 OFFIC E O F SOLI D WAST E AN D EMERGENC YRESPONS E

MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Reportabl e Quantitie s Adjustmen t R/l e fo r Radionuclide s FROM : TO : Reportabl e Quantitie s Adjustmen tKyl e to rRadionuclide s

Timoth yFields , Jr. , Director / / }^^J-MJd/J/js

U\ Emergenc yResponse Divisio n <<^*V>srx -^i%

. <J^&J£jCf )#}&& The Recor

d v(r
OnMa y24 , 1989 , th e Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc ypublishe d a fina l rul e adjustin g th e reportabl e quantitie s (RQ ) fo r radionuclide s unde r sectio n 10 2 o f th e Comprehensiv e Environmenta l Response , Compensation , and Liabilit y Ac t (CERCLA ) o f 1980 , a s amende d (5 4 FR 22524 , Ma y24 , 1989) . Du e t o a n oversight , som e relevan t material s ma yhav e bee nomitte d fro mth e docket . Attache d pleas e find th e followin g documents :
1 . Administrativ e Exemption s fo r Radionuclide s (memorandumfro m Elle n Warhi t and Stev e Wyngarde nt o Barbar a Hostag e - Novembe r 2 , 1987 ) 2 . Backgroun d Informatio nRelate d t o Certai nRado nRelease s (Decembe r 8 , 1987 ) 3" . Technica l Backgroun d Supplemen t i n Suppor t o f Rulemakin g Adjustmen t Activitie s fo r Reportabl e Quantitie s o f Radionuclide s (March , 1989 )
Thes e item s ar e t o b e considere d par t o f th e docke t fo r th e Radionuclid e RQ Adjustmen t Rule . Attachment s
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 14, 2017

No. 04-17-00400-CR, 04-17-00401-CR, 04-17-00402-CR, 04-17-00403-CR & 04-17-00404-CR

Logan Trey FIELD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5810, 5811, 5812, 5813 & 5814

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant Logan Field filed separate notices of appeal for five related trial court causes 

from Gillespie County in appeals numbered 04-17-00400-CR, 04-17-00401-CR, 04-17-00402-

CR, 04-17-00403-CR, and 04-17-00404-CR. Appellant moved this court to consolidate these 

appeals. Because each of the Gillespie County appeals pertains to the same event and the same 

grounds for a motion to suppress, we granted Appellant’s motion in part. We ordered Appellant 

and the State to file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one and to include 

all five appeal numbers in the style of the case. We advised the parties that this court would 

include each appeal number in any further orders, but we would maintain a separate appellate 

record for each appeal. 

On November 1, 2017, Appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief in 

these cases, and a motion to consolidate the five Gillespie County appeals with four appeals from 

Kerr County numbered 04-17-00321-CR, 04-17-00322-CR, 04-17-00323-CR, and 04-17-00324-

CR. Those appeals are all based on the same event that occurred in Gillespie County on July 14, 

2015. 

Appellant’s motion to consolidate the Kerr County and Gillespie County appeals for 

purposes of briefing and arguments is DENIED. However, this court will treat the Kerr County 

and Gillespie County appeals as companion cases. The two sets of appeals will be considered 

and decided by the same panel at the same time. 
Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s 

brief is due on November 15, 2017.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of November, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27835]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4183-000]

3E Energy Services, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

October 16, 1997.
    3E Energy Service, LLC (3E) submitted for filing a rate schedule 
under which 3E will engage in wholesale electric power and energy 
transactions as a marketer. 3E also requested waiver of various 
Commission regulations. In particular, 3E requested that the Commission 
grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of 
securities and assumptions of liability by 3E.
    On October 9, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Rate Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, 
granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the 
following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by 3E should file a motion to intervene or 
protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, 3E is authorized 
to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a 
guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of 
another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some 
lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of 3E's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is November 10, 1997. Copies 
of the full text of the order are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27835 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
259 La. 55

#### MEDIA PRODUCTION CONSULTANTS, INC. v. MERCEDES-BENZ OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. and Cookie’s Auto Sales, Inc. and Oliver Cinnater, d/b/a Crescent City Motors.

No. 51475.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1971.

In re: Media Production Consultants, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 247 So.2d 266.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SRA International, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Richard J. Nadeau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 12, 2010



/S/    RICHARD J.
NADEAURichard J. Nadeau
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 21.1


                     WONDERWARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Name of Subsidiary                                Jurisdiction of Incorporation
-------------------                               -----------------------------
Soft Systems Engineering, Inc.                    Pennsylvania
Wonderware Europe, Inc.                           Delaware
Wonderware International, Inc.                    U.S. Virgin Islands
Wonderware Korea, Ltd.                            Korea
Wonderware Systems, Inc.                          Delaware
Wonderware GmbH                                   Germany
Wonderware Italia Spa                             Italy
Wonderware of Argentina, Inc.                     Delaware
Wonderware of Japan, Inc.                         Delaware
Wonderware of Mexico, Inc.                        Delaware
Wonderware of Taiwan, Inc.                        Delaware



<PAGE>
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

AUSTIN 

OF 

., 

‘rai 

TEXAS 

Dear sikt 

,- 

. . 

/ 

1 

./ 

I 

i 
9451~ 

It la stated In Taxas J~iqmudanoe,.Tol. 39, p. 

"Itvan in the absenoe oi pow@7 bi!.~r~lrly 

oonferrd; trustsea nay -ploy 

x!r 

..,,> ,. Morn& 

to ln8tiltuto a&J prowoute aotl. In their 

behalf as a'oraeaeary lnoldent 6;i thelr.poaer 

to aontraot, to sue and to a&ago and to 

oontrol the sohool affair8 and inleirs88r. 

r,ibmdao they may pay auoh an attorney a 

rewfmab&s 0mapen~8810n Out or th0 epeotil~ 

.rln%snanoe fund in the saaagernent~ and eontrol of tha.tZuaQees. And it 16Aeld t&t 

theBo~W Irf~Eduo&loa of the oity, rhloh 

.har essrrmsd @tr.oL or its aohool.8 a8 an Indopsndeati diatrlet, may entploy MqEtor+y 

esthar to .@mm+te or-defand:ti~CI LitlmtiOn, 

lnvolriag the l&te*&ty of anp~ttie-or reguIaClon &eWtbd by thW JZeOeBB~ fit! 8h;he inaintenancm of an efflolant system of sohoo.la Sor 

t&a say. 

tartmy an&~un%y'attorney wa#,.fo .&&~'a# the 

mitt fttttotioa~@..tha~~ o?flosrr.the pprostwution of ~OXlmlnal ealsw.* 
744 

'gut hosteua ham 110 pwur, either exgawt6iad or $.mplied, to employ oounssl and 

s~pend publie fondr ot the dl#tri$$ln M 

aCtapt ta s*ouxe 0% &if*t lrglelatlon; lndeed ,apih bontraetq am ordinarily oontrary 

Se publl~.~pgl.$ay and are void.* 

,It; &,tblmo,,that Ar$iele 354, eupra, prorides that 

Dlerlot and opunty Attorneya sbalJ advlre and $lw oplnlow to t&a nkrlow fmunty sob preoiwt offiaurs :$m@tlng 

$hulr QlilOlal 'dUti68. Roworer, we do no8 think tlkt~ this 

artiolh.aao~bs; oo~trusd sWiapoai~& upon ~a Dfa$l%ob or 

i : 

/ 

It iO,tke o+IiOn of this ~dupartwhntthmt thwu la . 

&CI duty ~osSa~.ti~o~ the~Cou+i%y Attorney: by lar .tii perfom 

the abotb ment~~~d~h~io~~l~ OQllWO*ti0~ wlihh,att eleotlcpn 

to eon#olida$e ii&apnidWit eelrot& dWtrlot8 and that~ dald 

dlatriot or dl@t&olP mky legally sontraot with the- County 

Attorney to p&?@p suuh 8etitoes and pty.hi2t.a reaaanablr 

oompensatlon ~hc3mfoc out of tha'iq@*al apalutesianos t-d 

in tha muagmto!lt and Oontrql Of,ths frarrteese. 

"Truatingg that~tho foregoing fully,answere ymr 

lJiQulry*~w~ are 

YOore very truly 

ATTORmrrr~L OPTXAS 

APPROVED 

OPINION COMMn-rcs 0. .YW 

--
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51704-51705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26139]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Neuroscience; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Panel for Neuroscience (1158).
    Date and Time: October 23 & 24, 1997; 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Place: Hotel Monteleone, 214 Royal Street, New Orleans, LA.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Persons: Dr. Kathie Olsen, Program Director, 
Neuroendocrinology; Division of Integrative Biology and 
Neuroscience; room 685, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230; Telephone: (703) 306-1423.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Agenda: Open Session: October 24, 1997; 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 
p.m., To discuss research trends and opportunities in

[[Page 51705]]

Neuroendocrinology. Closed Session: October 23, 1997; 9:00 a.m. to 
6:00 p.m.; October 24, 1997; 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.; 12:00 p.m. to 
6:00 p.m. To review and evaluate Neuroendocrinology proposals as 
part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 29, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26139 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit (4)(b)(xiii)



 
Exhibit (4)(b)(xiii)

 
GE LIFE AND ANNUITY ASSURANCE COMPANY

ANNUITY CROSS FUNDED ENDORSEMENT 

 
The Policy to which this endorsement is added, is endorsed as follows: 
 

	 1.	 Add the following Definition: 

 

	     	 CROSS FUNDED ANNUITY — The deferred annuity Policy issued and agreed upon by GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company as indicated on the Policy data
pages. 

 

	 2.	 The Death Benefit Provisions Upon the Death of the Annuitant provision is amended by adding the following paragraph: 

 

	     	 Partial surrenders of any Account Value, that are immediately allocated to the Cross Funded Annuity, reduce the Death Benefit provided under the Policy or any optional rider
in the same manner as any other partial surrender of Account Value. Except as otherwise required by law, GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company will treat for federal and state income tax reporting purposes the partial surrenders that are immediately
allocated to the Cross Funded Annuity, as non-taxable internal transfers of assets inside a single deferred annuity. 

 
This endorsement is effective on the Policy Date unless another date is specified on the Policy data pages. 
 
For GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company, 
 
 
/s/    PAMELA S. SCHUTZ 
Pamela S. Schutz 
        President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL LEE MYERS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 05-309 Erie

v. )

)

GADDIS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was received by the Clerk of

Court on October 20, 2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan

Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act,

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 2], filed on

October 21, 2005, recommended that the motion be denied and that the matter be

dismissed without prejudice. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of

service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on

Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the motion and

documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following

order is entered:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis [Doc. No. 1] is DENIED, and the matter is DISMISSED without

prejudice. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 2] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on October 21, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00319-SJM-SPB Document 3 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 1
NO. 12-14-00009-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

WILLIAM ROBERT PARKER, 

APPELLANT

V.

CHARLES R. MITCHELL,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 123RD 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SHELBY COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this pro se appeal. In his motion, Appellant states

that there are still unresolved issues against other defendants. We interpret this as an assertion 

that the judgment he seeks to appeal is not a final judgment and therefore is not appealable. See 

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because Appellant has met the 

requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted, and the 

appeal is dismissed. 

Opinion delivered January 31, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JANUARY 31, 2014

NO. 12-14-00009-CV

WILLIAM ROBERT PARKER,

Appellant

V.

CHARLES R. MITCHELL,

Appellee

Appeal from the 123rd District Court 

of Shelby County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 13-CV-32,350)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 10569 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Juan Pablo Quezada,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CV

- 655

Before **Jones, Duncan,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Juan Pablo Quezada, federal prisoner # 44924

- 380, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute at least 50 grams of methamphetamine and was sentenced 480 months in prison

. United States v. Quezada , 839 F. App’x 913, 914 (5th Cir. 2021). Quezada filed a motion to

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published a nd is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 3, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-10569 Document: 00516223361 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2022No. 21

- 10569

2 vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Quezada filed a motion to compel discovery in the § 2255 proceeding. The
district court denied the motion , and Quezada now appeal s . The
G overnment moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and, alternatively , moves for an extension of time to file a brief.
We have j urisdiction over final decisions and other decisions covered by the collateral order doctrine. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292; Mohawk Indus.,
Inc. v. Carpenter , 558 U.S. 100, 103, 106, 116 (2009). In this case, no final judgment has been entered and there are no immediately appealable orders. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. The motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is **GRANTED**

. The alternative motion for an extension
of time to file a brief is **DENIED AS UNNECESSARY**  . The appeal is
**DISMISSED** for lack of jurisdiction. Case: 21-10569 Document: 00516223361 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/03/2022
MEJORAS VIALES EN LA ENTRADA A FORT BELVOIR (KINGMAN Y WALKER 

GATES)

CONDADO DE FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA

Disponibilidad para Reunion Pública

La División de Carreteras de Tierras Federales del Este de la Administración Federal de 

Carreteras (FHWA) en cooperación con el Ejército de los EE. UU. Fort Belvoir y el 

Departamento de Transportación de Virginia, propone construir mejoras viales en Kingman y 

Walker Gates. Las mejoras de Kingman Gate implican la construcción de nuevos carriles de 

desvio desde Fairfax County Parkway hasta John J Kingman Road para reducir las colas de 

vehículos que giran a la izquierda. Las mejoras de Walker Gate implican extender el carril de 

giro a la izquierda desde Mt Vernon Memorial Highway hasta Mt Vernon Road y otras mejoras 

de intersección relacionadas.

La información del proyecto y la documentación ambiental correspondiente están disponibles 

para su revisión en https://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/projects/notices.htm . Puede solicitar que se lleve a 

cabo una reunión de información pública llamando o enviando una solicitud por correo 

electrónico a Eden Jemal, Gerente de Proyecto, al (202) 924-8897 o eden.jemal@dot.gov en o 

antes del 31 de diciembre de 2020. Si se recibe una solicitud para una reunión pública y FHWA 

no puede resolver preguntas o inquietudes, se programará una reunión pública. Se publicará y 

notificará un aviso de la fecha, hora y lugar de la reunión programada.

FHWA garantiza la no discriminación en todos los programas y actividades de acuerdo con el 

Título VI y el Título VII de la Ley de Derechos Civiles de 1964. Si tiene preguntas o inquietudes 

sobre sus derechos civiles con respecto a este proyecto o asistencia especial para personas con 

discapacidades o dominio limitado del inglés, póngase en contacto con Eden Jemal.

Proyecto Federal: VA ST FB KNGMNWLKR GT
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-6671 |
|------------------------------------|----------|

 

DWS Global High Income Fund, Inc.

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

Two International Place

Boston, MA  02110

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 10/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 10/31/07 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

 

DWS Global HighIncome Fund, Inc.

Annual Report to Stockholders

October 31, 2007

A nondiversified closed-end investment company seeking high current incomeas its primary objective and capital appreciation as a secondary objectivethrough investment principally in global income securities.