alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: January 12, 2012 | By:    | /s/ James Kedrowski                                   |   |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | James Kedrowski                                       |
|                   |   | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Director          |
|                   |   |
|                   |   |
|                   |   |
|                   | By:    | /s/ Michael Kalb                                      |   |
|                   |   | Michael Kalb                                          |
|                   |   | Group Vice President, Interim Chief Financial Officer |
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302*
             Date: November 19, 2007By:
    /s/ Robin ListName:
    Robin ListTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer 
 *
    
    The introductory portion of paragraph 4 of the Section 302 certification that refers to the
certifying officers responsibility for establishing and maintaining internal control over
financial reporting for the company, as well as paragraph 4(b), have been omitted
in accordance with Release No. 33-8760 (December 15, 2006) because the compliance period has been
extended for small business issuers until the first fiscal year ending on or after December 15,
2007.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remedent, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31,, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Robin List, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Philippe Van Acker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge: 

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 
|                   |   |                    |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| /s/ Robin List         |   | /s/ Philippe Van Acker  |
| Robin List             |   | Philippe Van Acker      |
| Chief Executive Office |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| February 21, 2006      |   | February 21, 2006       |

 

 

 
|  |
|--|
No. 00-7052.

#### Loheac v. Poole, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



In connection with the Annual Report of Rural/Metro Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack E. Brucker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 4, 2004



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|                                                     
|/s/    JACK E. BRUCKER                               
|                                                     
|Jack E. Brucker President and Chief Executive
Officer
258 La. 343

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John NEWMAN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51276.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1971.

In re: John Newman applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27790]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 09/79-0409]


New Vista Capital Fund, L.P.; Notice of Issuance of a Small 
Business Investment Company; License

    On May 14, 1997, an application was filed by New Vista Capital 
Fund, L.P., at 499 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 140, Palo Alto, California 
94301, with the Small Business Administration (SBA) pursuant to Section 
107.300 of the Regulations governing small business investment 
companies (13 CFR 107.300 (1996)) for a license to operate as a small 
business investment company.
    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Section 301(c) of the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, after having 
considered the application and all other pertinent information, SBA 
issued License No. 09/79-0409 on September 17, 1997, to NewVista 
Capital Fund, L.P. to operate as a small business investment company.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.011, Small 
Business Investment Companies)

    Dated: October 10, 1997.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 97-27790 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Horace Lee BYRD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-169.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 5, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Richard M. Sauls, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Honorable T. If. Trlmblt, 

Flret ~salntdnt 

State SuperlntwnIcnt 

or Public frutruction 

Au8 t In, Texm 

Dar sirt 

ok a0lma1oq.p 

Poooat48tolarid)h~ 

quotodlrttertrw)Ir. A.C.Jadmm,Wuuwr 

BWnagoP of Iubboek Indeg+rk&nt Sohool Dlatrlet, whloh 

lett8r mat& u follwBt 

oprnion o-5794’ 

Rot Would it be obligatory 

for the Lubboak Xtadrpeadsnt 

School Di#trlot, O~rrting 

8ehool bum8 for whit. 

children to 8180 tran8port 

aegro ehi ldnnt 

've have a quatioa in thi8 dlstriat th8t 

ha8 8riaen thet I would like for you to furrlirnh 

me with M qrlnloar irea the Attorttq Ouwtr8l 

ngmdtrtg it, if youlwe a reo8nt opinion that 

uoul4 ruff%e. Thofaot8a.twthe8ot 

"A. The Lubbeek Independent Sahool Dlatrlot 

u~l*btg appPoxipto1~ kn die* 8quare oporata 

mo&ool bu8r.m for the whit+ ohildrea llvin# throo 

mllos c ROPO -the mheola. 

"c. u* hnve no fw111t1ea for tPatmportat1an 

of m ohll4roa. 

*What remld like to know 16 whether the 

SvaPd, h8vl 

theuhlt*ahl4nn,~ 2 ltobl~tQ@yan -*part 

l rtablirhd 8 pollcr~ of tX'U-P@-ing 

totx'anopaa'ttho aergo ohll4ron. 
I ,, 

~mmomb1. T. II. Trlmblo m P 

md 611 colomU ohildrut ln tJ# dratrlct &we be6n 

6tkndln~ theac achmla. 

‘It re as-e gbllgated t9 ::runaport colored cnl,l-Ix-en 

can they be transported alone ufth the vhltc children 

or whether ltpamtc traJuIportat1orl wrruld tutc t-3 be 

provided? 

‘finy lnfcmration that you say be able to g:ve 

me relative. t3 t>ls will be appreciated.” 

Replying to the foregoing letter, we call your 

attention to Artlale VII. s~tlon 7 of the Conatltutim or 

Texas and to ~rtlalt 2900 Revlaed Statutea, rhlcll are OS followat 

*sec.’ 7. Sepurtcr school8 ah611 be prwidcd 

tar the white and colored ctalldz-e~,~and lapertlal 

prOri8ion 8hall be made for both. 

yAPtlole 2s)oo. All rv6llablo public school 

fuw36 oi thla SMte 8h6ll k 8pproprl&ted ln e8ch 

aouaty for the edwatiw alllce ef white end oobrd 

ahll&8a, u&d lqmrtlal povi*iam ah&l1 be maw far 

bath Pnooa. no uhlte ehildlwn 8kll 6tt6M rchado 

wppox%d for 801~1-64 ahil&r6a, aor 6h611 oolinwd 

ehildrrntt~nd 6bho6186upportd far uhito ohildma. 

Th6 t6rn 'odor& x-608' md 'aolomd ahlldrm,* 66 

~- ~~'npclt&~~~~ of mlttd 

. 

Xt ~111 be obaeved that both the Cometltutlon emd 

t& 8tatuto cited ebwe require the “imp8rtU pre~l81om 

l hallbmde forboth~rme8. SInea tfu Uxbbatk a&hod 

dirtrlet has made prorlmlaa folr tram~lttg whlto ohildroa 

uholir+ront?nnthmmll~ fiathe l uhoela, it follow 

thattair Ifam aotboen ~lrlprovlDlmunlew 8 

l lmllar plwi8lal ir a&e for e&?mpwtlmg th aolerod ehildna 

UbOllVOran:~~~Il8Sicr~tbOir.MhOOl. 

ram thonfoa'wt~toolernd ehllQraar0 

oat1tled to ttm w fikallitloa roP tmJt&portation to aad fmm 

Mhoa aa m ublto Obildma. 

Hbthe~atah Aqertbl faelltlea is tacayof bui 

tbetuermwa,arbypaarib~Pm=th8u8eofthesembuaby 

tmmpwtatsonuosieodblbyirnaichiall~~bunoo~ 

ttm oRlldron of both rem, la a atter not gowmod by my 

8tafUtg law. It16 6mxtter tokdekmlndbyth61ec61 

oohml alt~tla.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. James N. McCoy v. Frank BLACKBURN.

No. 61998.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: James N. McCoy applying for writ of habeas corpus and remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q/A FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FORM 10-Q/A.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,293,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,139,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (207,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,731,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,170,404
<PP&E>                                         483,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (66,299)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,411,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,155,928
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    27,714,346
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,704,067)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,411,534
<SALES>                                     17,382,763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,382,763
<CGS>                                       16,170,002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,170,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               508,993
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             456,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,053,397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,053,397)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,053,397)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)


</TABLE>
#### Loy W. SCARBOROUGH and Hess Curry, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John A. DUKE, Defendant-Relator.

No. 3562.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 16, 1971.

Writ Refused Oct. 18, 1971.

*59Charley J. Schrader, Jr., Houma, for defendant-relator.

Norman Magee, Ferriday, Long, Sleeth & Hughes, by, Edwin R. Hughes, Jena, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before HOOD, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

MILLER, Judge.

This writ was granted and the June 2, 1971 sheriff’s sale stayed to permit our review of the allegation that defendant relator’s mortgaged property was ordered sold under executory process without sufficient authentic evidence. The application convinced us that the judgment of executory process was based in part on insufficient authentic evidence. Most of the issues presented in this writ application are before us in Scarborough v. Duke, La.App., 251 So.2d 55, handed down this date.

The judgment of executory process was based in part on a $5,000 promissory note made payable to the Bank of Jena. There was no authentic evidence in the record to support the Bank of Jena’s endorsement, and the Bank of Jena was not a party to the foreclosure proceeding.

The requirement of authentic evidence to support every link in the necessary chain of evidence in an executory proceeding is the very foundation of exec-utory procedure. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2635. To justify the order of seizure and sale, every muniment of title and every link of evidence must be in authentic form. Miller, Lyon & Co. v. Cappel, 36 La.Ann. 264 (1884).

The trial court’s judgment of April 20, 1971 denying the writ of injunction is reversed only insofar as it failed to enjoin the sheriff’s sale based on the $5,000 mortgage dated October 12, 1966, recorded in Mortgage Book 62 at page 568, Records of LaSalle Parish, Louisiana. The injunction is granted to that limited extent. Costs of this writ application are assessed to respondent.

Reversed in part, and rendered.
ADDENDUM NO. 1 : -i 

This addendum modifies the Grant Agreement between the U.S. Department ofT~arisp6Hatiori 1\ 

and the Manistee Blacker Airport Authority, in association with the Community:<;>±~~-.,., ,., ,-, __ 

Manistee/Lundington, Michigan, under the Alternative Essential Air Service :Prdgr~trf 5 ':.- '-' u 

(Agreement), which was entered into by the Parties on May 3, 2012. 

The following modifications are agreed to by the Parties and hereby made to the Agreement, 

pursuant to Section 3, paragraph (g) of the Agreement: 

Replace Section 4, paragraph (b )(ii) with the following: 

ii. In its agreements with the carrier, the Grantee will ensure that if the carrier 

terminates service during the first year of service under this Agreement, 

the carrier shall pay the Grantee a pro-rata portion of the $200,000 start-up 

costs based on the number of months remaining during the first year of 

this Agreement. All prorated funds the Grantee receives from the carrier 

will be reimbursed to DOT. 

Replace Section 4, paragraph (c) with the following: 

c. Completed Flight Segments: 

1. . During the first five months of the first year of service, DOT will 

reimburse the Grantee $77.82 per passenger seat flown for up to 24,971 

passenger seats [($2,143,294-$200,000)/24,971]. 

ii. During the remainder of the first year of service, DOT will reimburse the 

Grantee $194.55 per passenger seats flown with a maximum of 1,140 seats 

per month ($221,787 per month). 

111. During the entire first year of service, no more than $1,943,294 shall be 

reimbursed to the Grantee for passenger seats flown. 

IV. During the second year of service, DOT will pay the Grantee $106.18 per 

passenger seat flown for up to 19,361 passenger seats. 

($2,055, 781/19,361 ). 

The Parties agree and understand that the U.S. Department of Transportation will not provide any 

additional reimbursements for start-up costs incurred for starting the service except for any prorated funds 

returned to the Department pursuant to Section 4, paragraph (b)(ii). 
-2-

·oated:. __ f_J.( (_2_0 -1--/_1_2-___ , 2012 Manistee Blacker Airpmt Authority 

/f/ /J> // 

By: fl-a_//~--- Paul D. Schulert 

Chairman 

Manistee Blacker Airport Authority 

Dated:_--J_/.!_1 ,/-/__:__;-+~/-/-,/_} l_-_-_, 2012 U.S. Department of Transportation 

Deputy Assistant Secretary 

for Aviation and Intemational Affairs
#### Babette TRAUB and Natalie Kaplan, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Henry Fay, Deceased, and Eleanor Madison, Individually, Petitioners, v. Mervyn PLATT, Allan Plapinger, and Wallace Plapinger, d/b/a Eastern State Properties and Reserve Insurance Company, a Foreign Insurance Corporation, Respondents.

No. 77-2576.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 12, 1978.

Arnold R. Ginsberg of Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Miami, and Sadow & Lynne,-P. A., North Miami, for petitioners.

Nancy Little Hoffmann, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.

DOWNEY, C. J., and CROSS and MOORE, JJ., concur.
#### Earnestine Turner SMITH v. Lorenzo HARRIS and James Weathersby.

No. 45368.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 12, 1969.

Wroten, Orlansky & Miller, Greenville, for appellant.

Lake, Tindall & Hunger, Greenville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### John Henry ROSS, Jr. v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50100.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 25, 1978.

Donald B. Patterson, Brookhaven, John P. Price, McComb, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Robert D. Findley, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before INZER, P. J., SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
|   | a. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June      12, 2009 | By:   | /s/ Paul B. Toms, Jr.                           |
|-------------------------------------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                |            | Paul      B. Toms, Jr.                          |
|                                |            | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer       |
|                                |            |                                            |
|                                | By:             | /s/ E. Larry Ryder                              |
|                                |            | E.      Larry Ryder                             |
|                                |            | Executive      Vice President - Finance and     |
|                                |            | Administration      and Chief Financial Officer |

----
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:     November
      12,  2010
                By:
                /s/
      Guy De VreeseName:
                Guy
      De VreeseTitle:
                Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of
the  undersigned  officers  of  Sunland  Entertainment  Co.,  Inc.,  a  Delaware
corporation (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify with respect to the Amendment
No. 1 to the Annual  Report of the Company on Form  10-KSB/A  for the year ended
December  31, 2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the
"10-KSB/A Report") that:

(1)  the 10-KSB/A  Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the 10-KSB/A Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.




Date:  July 11, 2003                      /s/ David Weiner
                                          ------------------------------
                                             Co-President






Date:  July 11, 2003                      /s/ Gary Freeman
                                          ------------------------------
                                             Gary Freeman
                                             Chief Financial Officer and
                                             Corporate Secretary
#### Mary E. McGRATH v. Joseph AMELIANOVICH.

No. 6011.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Oct. 22, 1936.

Charles E. Loy, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.

Freeman & Freeman, of Chicago, 111., for appellee.

Before SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

On consideration whereof it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed without costs to either party pursuant to the foregoing stipulation. It is further ordered that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                               AGEMARK CORPORATION

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                        SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                                                        ---------------------------
                                                                                          2003              2002
                                                                                        ---------        ---------
<S>                                                                                     <C>              <C>
Common shares issued                                                                    1,109,481        1,000,000

Shares cancelled , assumed abandoned                                                                        54,393-

Weighted average common shares assumed outstanding for period                           1,109,481          945,607
</TABLE>


(1)  Shares attributable to vested stock options are anti-dilutive.