alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MICHAEL A. WIGGINS, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

v. 1 Civil Action No. 06-20 Erie 

) WARDEN JAMES SHERMAN, et al., ) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

Plaintiff's civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on 

January 31, 2006 and was referred to Llnited States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise 

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(I), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on February 2, 2006, 

recommended that the Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Foma Pauperis [Doc. # I] be 

denied and the case be dismissed without prejudice. The parties were allowed ten (10) 

days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by 

certified mail at FCI-McKean, where he is incarcerated. No objections were filed. After 

-- de novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the report 

and recommendation, the following order is entered: 

AND NOW, this 27th Day of February, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion [Doc. # I] to Proceed 

In Forma Pauperis is denied and the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated February 2, 2006, is 

adopted as the opinion of this Court. 

S/ SEAN J. MclAUGHLlN 

Sean J. McLaughlin 

United States District Judge 

cc: all parties of record 

U.S. Magistrate Judge Baxter 

Case 1:06-cv-00020-SJM-SPB Document 4 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 1
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3345 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that floor plan 

financing includes the financing of certain trailers and campers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 27, 2023 

Ms. ERNST (for herself and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that floor plan financing includes the financing of certain 

trailers and campers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Travel Trailer and 

5 Camper Tax Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FLOOR PLAN FINANCING APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN 

7 TRAILERS AND CAMPERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 163(j)(9)(C) of the Inter9 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following new flush sentence: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3345 IS

1 ‘‘Such term shall also include any trailer or camper which 

2 is designed to provide temporary living quarters for rec3 reational, camping, or seasonal use and is designed to be 

4 towed by, or affixed to, a motor vehicle.’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

7 December 31, 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
p.1 

PICK-UPDATE: 3/15/2007 

BOX OF 30 

Step 2: FOR ASRC INTERNAL USE 

ONLY 

(PART B of B) 

EPA DOCKET ID: 102RQ-RN 

1) 102RQ-RN-5-16 

3) 102RQ-RN-5-18 

5) 102RQ-RN-5-20 

7) 102RQ-RN-5-22 

9) 102RQ-RN-5-24 

11) 102RQ-RN-5-26 

13) 102RQ-RN-5-28 

15) 102RQ-RN-5-30 

17) 102RQ-RN-6-1 

19) 102RQ-RN-6-3 

21) 102RQ-RN-6-5 

23) 102RQ-RN-6-7 

25) 102RQ-RN-6-9 

27) 102RQ-RN-6-11 

29) 102RQ-RN-6-13 

31) 102RQ-RN-6-15 

33) 102RQ-RN-6-17 

35) 102RQ-RN-6-19 

37) 102RQ-RN-6-21 

39) 102RQ-RN-6-23 

Step 3: FOR ASRC INTERNAL USE 

ONLY 

CD: 

OA: / 

2) 102RQ-RN-5-17 

4) 102RQ-RN-5-19 

6) 102RQ-RN-5-21 

8) 102RQ-RN-5-23 

10) 102RQ-RN-5-25 

12) 102RQ-RN-5-27 

14) 102RQ-RN-5-29 

16) (i02RQ-RN-5-32^ 

18) 102RQ-RN-6-2 

20) 102RQ-RN-6-4 

22) 102RQ-RN-6-6 

24) 102RQ-RN-6-8 

26) 102RQ-RN-6-10 

28) 102RQ-RN-6-12 

30) 102RQ-RN-6-14 

32) 102RQ-RN-6-16 

34) 102RQ-RN-6-18 

36) 102RQ-RN-6-20 

38) 102RQ-RN-6-22 

40) 102RQ-RN-6-24 

Step 1: FOR ASRC INTERNAL USE ONLY ^^^ 

Are there more documents for this Docket in another box? *YES //NO / 

*Fill out Continuation Sheet and go to Step 2 

Internal SFUND Box Number 36 OF _283 

Initials/Date: _LDS_/_3-15-2007_ 
Q -M, 

P ' /O^l.fiL-RM-G-3^ 

/ ' 

/

 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

P.2 

- ^TM____- * WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Vp„0^ 0 

JUL 10 1988 

OFFICE OF 

SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Reportable Quantities Adjustment R/le for Radionuclides 

FROM: 

TO: 

Reportable Quantities Adjustment Kyle tor Radionuclides 

Timothy Fields, Jr., Director// }^^J-MJd/J/js U\ 

Emergency Response Division <<^*V>srx-^i%. <J^&J£jCf )#}&& 

The Record v (r 

On May 24, 1989, the Environmental Protection Agency published a final 

rule adjusting the reportable quantities (RQ) for radionuclides under section 

102 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended (54 FR 22524, May 24, 1989). Due to an 

oversight, some relevant materials may have been omitted from the docket. 

Attached please find the following documents: 

1. Administrative Exemptions for Radionuclides (memorandum from 

Ellen Warhit and Steve Wyngarden to Barbara Hostage -

November 2, 1987) 

2. Background Information Related to Certain Radon Releases 

(December 8, 1987) 

3". Technical Background Supplement in Support of Rulemaking 

Adjustment Activities for Reportable Quantities of Radionuclides 

(March, 1989) 

These items are to be considered part of the docket for the Radionuclide 

RQ Adjustment Rule. 

Attachments
1

Subject: FW: for NOX docket: FW: 2011 EHP paper on air pollution and inflammation

Attachments: EHP paper data.doc

From: Zhu Tong [mailto:tzhu@pku.edu.cn] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:17 AM 

To: Patel, Molini 

Cc: Weiwei Lin 

Subject: 答复: 2011 EHP paper on air pollution and inflammation 

Dear Dr. Patel,

Thanks for your interest in our paper. Attached file contains the information you requested.

Best Regards

Tong

Tong Zhu, Dr.

Professor, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering

Director, Centre for Environment and Health

Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Tel:+86‐10‐62754789; Fax:+86‐10‐62760755

http://cese.pku.edu.cn

发件人: Patel, Molini [mailto:Patel.Molini@epa.gov] 

发送时间: 2013 年 7 月 16 日 5:19 

收件人: tzhu@pku.edu.cn

主题: 2011 EHP paper on air pollution and inflammation 

Dear Dr. Zhu,

Our office is currently developing the Integrated Science Assessment for Nitrogen Oxides and reviewing your 2011 paper

in EHP, “Acute Respiratory Inflammation in Children and Black Carbon in Ambient Air before and during the 2008 Beijing

Olympics.”  We are interested in the copollutant modeling results you presented in Figure 3.  Would you please share

with us the quantitative results (effect estimates and 95% CIs) for the NO2‐eNO association adjusted for BC and PM2.5,

the BC‐eNO association adjusted for NO2, and the PM2.5‐eNO association adjusted for NO2.  We also hope you would

provide the correlations among these pollutants.  Thank you!

Best regards,

Molini M. Patel, PhD, MPH

Epidemiologist

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

National Center for Environmental Assessment

Mailcode: B243‐01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: 919.541.1492, Fax: 919.541.1818, Email: patel.molini@epa.gov
Acute Respiratory Inflammation in Children and Black Carbon in Ambient Air before and 

during the 2008 Beijing Olympics

Table 1. Single-pollutant├ and two-pollutant╞ models for percent change in eNO per IQR change in 

pollutant of interest, using 0-24 hr average pollutant concentrations (mean and 95% confidence 

interval). All estimates are adjusted for BMI, asthma, temperature, and RH

Table 2. Exposure correlation matrix (24-hour average pollution levels)

Pollutant BC PM2.5 NO2

BC 1.00 0.71** 0.68**

PM2.5 1.00 0.30*

NO2 1.00

*

p<0.05;

**p<0.001 from Wald-based tests of Spearman correlation coefficients

% change in eNO 95% CI

NO2

├ 11.0 9.2-12.7

NO2 with BC╞ 2.9 0.2-5.6

NO2 with PM2.5╞ 7.3 4.9-9.8

BC├ 16.6 14.1-19.2

BC with NO2

╞ 14.9 10.7-19.2

PM2.5├ 18.7 15.0-22.5

PM2.5 with NO2

╞ 12.2 7.4-17.1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATIA
TERMINALS GROUP N.V.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (804)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,823
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,155
<PP&E>                                         239,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (33,891)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,196
<BONDS>                                        101,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,189
<SALES>                                         29,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,305
<CGS>                                           26,969
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,260
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,274)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       264
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,538)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,538)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.22)


</TABLE>
#### Elmer P. WESTBERRY, Appellant, v. Barbara Ann WESTBERRY, Appellee.

No. 68-561.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

June 25, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 2, 1969.

Henry M. Cain and Edward L. Lustgar-ten, Miami, for appellant.

Thomas L. Treadwell, of Parks, Emerson, Treadwell & Elkins, Naples, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The final decree entered in this divorce action does not conform with the chancellor’s orally pronounced final decree at the close of the final hearing in the presence of both parties and their counsel.

The written final decree grants the divorce to both parties, whereas the oral pronouncement granted the divorce to the plaintiff-appellee.

The written final decree grants the home of the parties to the plaintiff-appellee as lump-sum alimony and also grants the plaintiff-appellee periodic alimony payments. The oral pronouncement of the court does not mention the award of the home and furnishings to be declared as lump-sum alimony to the plaintiff-appellee.

Further, there are two life insurance policies alluded to in the written final decree which are not even mentioned in the oral pronouncement of the court.

It was conceded in oral argument before this court that the written final decree was prepared by counsel for plaintiff-appellee and submitted to the chancellor, who was assigned to a judicial circuit other than his own, as he was preparing to return to his own circuit.

For the foregoing reasons this cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings and the entry of such final decree as the trial court deems necessary to conform with its true holding in this cause.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27645]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Task Force on Defense Reform

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Task Force on Defense Reform.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Task Force on Defense Reform will meet in closed sessions 
on November 4, 6, 13, 18, 20, and 25, 1997.
    The Task Force on Defense Reform was established to make 
recommendations to the Secretary of Defense and Deputy Secretary of 
Defense on alternatives for organizational reforms, reductions in 
management overhead, and streamlined business practices in the 
Department of Defense (DoD), with emphasis on the Office of the 
Secretary of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD field activities, 
and the Military Departments.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, 5 U.S.C., Appendix II, it has been 
determined that matters affecting national security, as covered by 5 
U.S.C. 552b(c)(1)(1988), will be presented throughout the meetings, and 
that, accordingly, these meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: October 14, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-27645 Filed 10-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### George D. JUDWAY, Jim Judway, Evelyn Judway and Economy Mobile Homes, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. Miles E. EDWARDS, as Custodian for Milene Gail Edwards, Linda Marie Edwards and John Michael Edwards, Appellee.

No. 69-704.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 24, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
255 La. 1089

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John ISTRE v. COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT, State of Louisiana.

No. 50182.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 24, 1970.

ORDER

Considering the foregoing motion alleging that the plaintiff-relator and the defendants have agreed to a compromise settlement of all claims asserted in this suit, and that relator has abandoned his application for writs pending in this Court and the parties wish that the Court remand it to the Sixteenth Judicial District Court for Iberia Parish, Louisiana so that it will be vested with jurisdiction to make findings of fact and render Reasons for Judgment and Judgment and thereby permitting relator to consummate the settlement of his claims and grant a valid release, this Court finding the parties are entitled to an order as prayed for;

It is ordered that the application for writ of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition filed by John Istre herein is abandoned and is hereby recalled and dismissed;

It is further ordered that this case be and it is hereby remanded to the Sixteenth Judicial District Court for Iberia Parish, Louisiana for the purpose of making findings of fact and rendering Reasons For Judgment and Judgment in favor of plaintiff in accordance therewith, in order that plaintiff-relator may compromise and settle all of his claims against the defendants herein and execute valid release of said defendants from liability.

Former decision, 228 So.2d 485.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quepasa Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C. Abbott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | /s/ JOHN C. ABBOTT     
| | John C. Abbott         
| | Chief Executive Officer



Date: October 24, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

RICHARD J. FRAHER

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 122 DB 2020 (No. 77 RST 2020)

Attorney Registration No. 69784

(Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2020, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated October 1, 2020, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Richard J. Fraher, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, 

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this 

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing 

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Meeting of the Sickle 
Cell Disease Advisory Committee

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Sickle Cell Disease Advisory Committee, National heart, Lung, 
and Blood Institute, November 14, 1997. The meeting will be held at the 
National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, Conference Room 9104, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    The entire meeting will be open to the public from 9:00 a.m. to 
adjournment, to discuss recommendations on the implementation and 
evaluation of the Sickle Cell Disease Program. Attendance by the public 
will be limited to space available.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact the Executive Secretary in advance of the meeting.
    Dr. Clairce D. Reid, Executive Secretary, Sickle Cell Disease 
Advisory Committee, Division of Blood Diseases and Resource, NHLBI, Two 
Rockledge Center, Suite 10160, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-0080, will furnish substantive program information, a 
summary of the meeting, and a roster of the committee members.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.839, Blood 
Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-26888 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
c. 6J Section 12 Disposition of moneys received

Section 12. All sums received under this chapter as excise, penalties or forfeitures, interest, costs of suit 

and fines shall be paid to the commissioner at the time required for filing required by section sixteen of 

chapter sixty-two C, and shall at least quarterly, be distributed, credited and paid by the state treasurer 

upon certification of the commissioner to each city or town that has adopted the provisions of this 

chapter in accordance with section thirteen in proportion to the amount of such sums received from the 

sale or use of aircraft fuel in each such city or town. 

Notwithstanding the provisions of this section and the provisions of section twenty-seven C of chapter 

twenty-nine, the sums distributed, credited, and paid to each of the towns of Bedford, Concord, 

Lexington, and Lincoln in which the provisions of this chapter are in effect shall be equal to the total of 

such sums received from the sale or use of aircraft fuel at the Lawrence G. Hanscom Field divided by the 

number of said towns in which the provisions of this chapter are in effect. 

Upon a vote of the town meeting in each of the towns of Bedford, Concord, Lexington, and Lincoln in 

which the provisions of this chapter are in effect, said towns may designate all or a portion of the sums 

received from the sale of aircraft fuel for the purposes of funding certain planning activities of the fourtown regional group known as Hanscom Area Towns II.

Robert V. Carr

Auditor, Miscellaneous Excises

Massachusetts Department of Revenue

Tel (617) 887-6766; Fax (617) 887-5039
Security Information








Security Purchased


CUSIP
ES0127797019


Issuer
EDP RENOVAVEIS SA


Underwriters
Banco Comercial Portugues SA, Banco
Espirito Santo, Caixa Banco de Investimento
SA, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, UBS, DBSI, JP
Morgan, Merrill Lynch, Santander Central
Hispano, Societe Generale


Years of continuous operation, including
predecessors> 3 years


Ticker
EDPR PL


Is the affiliate a manager or co-manager of
offering?Joint Lead Manager


Name of underwriter or dealer from which
purchasedMorgan Stanley


Firm commitment underwriting?
Yes


Trade date/Date of Offering
6/2/2008


Total dollar amount of offering sold to QIBs
 $                           2,436,896,438


Total dollar amount of any concurrent public
offering
$                               -


Total
 $                        2,436,896,438


Public offering price
 $                            12.43


Price paid if other than public offering
price
 N/A


Underwriting spread or commission
 $                            0.12


Rating
N/A


Current yield
N/A










Fund Specific Information








Board
Total Share Amount
Purchased
$ Amount of
Purchase
% of Offering
Purchased by the
Fund



DWS Funds







DWS Balanced Fund
DWS
19,306
 $                   240,005
0.01%



DWS Balanced VIP
DWS
5,874
 $                     73,023
0.00%



DWS Europe Equity Fund
DWS
57,900
 $                   719,790
0.03%



DWS International Fund
DWS
541,772
 $
6,735,097
0.28%



DWS International Select Equity Fund
DWS
93,000
 $
1,156,139
0.05%



DWS International Select Equity VIP
DWS
80,856
 $
1,005,170
0.04%



DWS International VIP
DWS
155,162
 $
1,928,913
0.08%



Total

953,870
 $
11,858,137
0.49%











^The Security and Fund Performance is
calculated based on information
provided by State Street Bank.




*If a Fund executed multiple sales of a
security, the final sale date is listed.
If a Fund still held the security as of
the quarter-end, the quarter-end date
is listed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7224

JAMES JUNIOR ALLEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID ROBINSON, Warden; HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairwoman of Virginia Parole Board; JAMES L. JENKINS, JR.; MS. RUSSELL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-27) Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 21, 2004 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Junior Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James Junior Allen appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Allen v. Robinson , No. CA-03-27 (E.D. Va. July 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED