alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Report Request ID: 1018567 Report Code: AMP430 Sep. 12, 2012

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: KHO

State County City Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

06

06

101

115

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter

Classification Parameter Method Duration

CRITERIA 88101

SELECTED OPTIONS

OZONE EVALUATION

AGENCY ROLE

MERGE PDF FILES

Option Type Option Value

SEASONAL-HOURLY

REPORTING

YES

SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Order Column

EPA_REGION

STATE_CODE

MONITOR_TYPE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

PARAMETER_CODE

POC

GLOBAL DATES

2011

Start Date End Date

01 12 2011

Tribal

Code
Sep. 12, 2012

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 1 of 3

MONITORS NOT REPORTING 
Sep. 12, 2012

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 2 of 3

DATE RANGE: 

REGION: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

California MONITOR TYPE: 

California Air Resources Board

SLAMS

JAN. 01, 2011 THRU DEC. 31, 2011

SITE ID

CITY

ADDRESS

PARAMETER POC DURATION

METHOD

------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS -------------------------------

NUMBER / PERCENT

06-101-0003 88101 PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 7

Yuba City

773 ALMOND ST, YUBA CITY

118

22

 71%

22

 79%

27

 87%

22

 73%

26

 84%

27

 90%

29

 94%

30

 97%

28

 93%

25

 81%

30

 100%

30

 97%

318

 87%

MONITORS REPORTING 

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR

STATE:

REP ORG:
Sep. 12, 2012

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 3 of 3

DATE RANGE: 

REGION: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

California

MONITOR TYPE: 

California Air Resources Board

SLAMS

JAN. 01, 2011 THRU DEC. 31, 2011

PARAMETER ACTIVE MONITORS # NOT REPORTING # MONITORS > 75% MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS

88101 PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 0 1 87.0%

1 0 1 87.0%

1 0 1 87.0%

1 0 1 87.0%

1 0 1 87.0%

1 0 1 87.0%

California Air Resources Board

California

REGION SUMMARY: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

REPORT SUMMARY: 

MT SUMMARY: SLAMS

REPORT SUMMARY

STATE:

STATE SUMMARY: 

REP ORG:

RO SUMMARY:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3267 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3267

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 410 Dakota Avenue South in Huron, South Dakota, as the ``First 
        Lieutenant Thomas Michael Martin Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 9, 2023

 Mr. Rounds (for himself and Mr. Thune) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 410 Dakota Avenue South in Huron, South Dakota, as the ``First 
        Lieutenant Thomas Michael Martin Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT THOMAS MICHAEL MARTIN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 410 Dakota Avenue South in Huron, South Dakota, shall be 
known and designated as the ``First Lieutenant Thomas Michael Martin 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Lieutenant Thomas Michael Martin Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN FEAGINS; YOLANDA

FEAGINS; KEVIN FEAGINS, Jr.;

JOSHUA FEAGINS; ANDRE FEAGINS;

JONATHAN FEAGINS,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

TRUMP ORGANIZATION; TRUMP

RUFFIN TOWER I, LLC; TRUMP

INTERNATIONAL HOTEL & TOWER -

LAS VEGAS UNIT OWNERS

ASSOCIATION; TRUMP RUFFIN

COMMERCIAL, LLC; OTIS

ELEVATOR CO.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-17359

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01121-GMNGWF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Gloria M. Navarro, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 7, 2015

San Francisco, California

Before: KOZINSKI, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

FILED

DEC 18 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The district court erred by holding that Nevada law requires expert

testimony for a claim of products liability. Krause Inc. v. Little, 34 P.3d 566,

571–72 (Nev. 2001). Where there are no alternative explanations for a

malfunction, Nevada law requires only evidence of an unexpected and dangerous

malfunction to establish a defect. See e.g., Stackiewicz v. Nissan Motor Corp. in

U.S.A., 686 P.2d 925, 928 (Nev. 1984). The declarations made by members of the

Feagins family, in conjunction with the videotape that depicted the events that

occurred inside the elevator, provided sufficient evidence to survive Otis Elevator

Co.'s motion for summary judgment.

The district court’s opinion was otherwise correct. The Feagins presented

no direct evidence of negligence by Trump.1 Nor could a jury infer negligence

under a theory of res ipsa loquitur because, at most, Trump exercised joint control

over the elevator with Otis Elevator Co. Fireman’s Fund Am. Ins. Cos. v. Knobbe,

562 P.2d 825, 825–26 (Nev. 1977); Landmark Hotel & Casino, Inc. v. Moore, 757

P.2d 361, 363 (Nev. 1988). The Feagins presented no evidence showing

“oppression, fraud or malice” as required for punitive damages. Nev. Rev. Stat.

§ 42.005. And the district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to reopen

1 We use the term “Trump” to refer to all Trump defendants: the Trump

Organization; Trump Ruffin Tower I, LLC; Trump International Hotel & Tower -

Las Vegas Unit Owners Association; and Trump Ruffin Commercial, LLC.

2
discovery given the Feagins’ lack of diligence both in failing to seek a schedule

modification before the close of discovery and in failing to generate an expert

report during the discovery period. See e.g., Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations,

Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992); Nidds v. Schindler Elevator Corp., 113

F.3d 912, 921 (9th Cir. 1996).

We VACATE and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this

disposition. The Feagins shall bear Trump’s costs on appeal. Otis shall bear the

Feagins’ and its own costs on appeal.

3
# Original

# Filtered

# Final
**Video: HDL-VLT_7-2-Stream Table.mp4**

**YouTube Information:**

Title: Virtual Hydraulics Lab Tour – Stream Table

Description: A brief introduction to FHWA’s Rivers and Roads Connection Program and the Stream Table, which is used to conduct hands on demonstrations that simulate river, floodplain, and infrastructure interactions.

Video: mp4

Captions: attached

Thumbnail file: attached

Public Listing Type: Unlisted (we only want people to discover this video through our website and the virtual tour.)

**Permissions, copyright, licensing:**

Video: The entire video is FHWA-owned.

Music: Atlantic Waves by Lux-Inspira. Licensed from Artlist. See attached PDF: AtlanticWaves_License_719099 - 2020-2021.pdf

**Script:**

The Stream Table is a component of the FHWA’s Rivers and Roads Connection Program, or R&R for short. Transportation and natural resource professionals carefully consider river systems and their processes to plan and design safe and resilient roads and bridges and to preserve or enhance the natural environment. The Stream Table is a centerpiece of hands-on demonstrations that simulate river, floodplain, and infrastructure interactions. The Stream Table uses small-scale models of bridges, culverts, bank protection, and other features to visually demonstrate key concepts such as soil erosion and deposition, and channel evolution.

**508 Caption Description:**

The video begins with an overhead view of a miniature stream formed in the Stream Table. The stream meanders left and right through bed material made of mainly white particles with various other colored particles scattered about. Both real and simulated vegetation, including plastic miniature trees, line the banks of the stream. In the upper corner of the Stream Table is a model road and parking lot which represent infrastructure. The camera angle changes so the stream now flows right to left and the camera pans along the stream with the colored particles easily visible as they travel along with the current. The video next switches to a closer view where the water is now dyed so it is more visible, and the stream is undercutting a roadway while a bridge abutment and pier are visible at the top edge of the screen. The camera cuts to a bend in the stream where hydraulic forces have eroded the bank of the channel.
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Robert H. SLATKO, Respondent.

No. 43638.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 25, 1973.

Martin Yelen, Coral Gables, and Norman A. Faulkner, Tallahassee, for complainant.

Robert H. Slatko, in pro. per., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In this Bar discipline case we review a recommendation of the referee dated March 30, 1973, that respondent, Robert H. Slatko, a member of The Florida Bar, be found guilty as charged in the Complaint and that he be found guilty of violation of Article XI, Rule 11.02 of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A., and Disciplinary Rule 1-102 (A) (4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility, 32 F.S.A., and the further recommendation that respondent be publicly reprimanded.

Respondent admits the following facts as contained in The Florida Bar’s Complaint:

> “3. The respondent, Robert H. Slatko, was indicted on tax evasion charges and failure to file tax returns for the years 1963, 1964 and 1965. These charges were brought to trial before the U. S. District Court, in and for the Southern District of Florida. That after commencement of trial and-prior to the case being submitted to the jury, the respondent, Robert H. Slatko, did plead guilty to the charge of failing to file a tax return for the years 1964 and 1965. He did further plead nolo contendere to the charge of failing to file a tax return for the year 1963.

> “4. That after hearing, the said respondent, Robert H. Slatko, was sentenced to federal prison.”

From the referee’s report it appears the aforesaid charges are misdemeanors under federal law, and we therefore accept the referee’s recommendation of discipline.

*18Publication of this opinion shall serve as a public reprimand.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.4

                       SECRETARY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of The Bralorne Mining Company (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2002, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lucien R. Paquette, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Secretary
Treasurer  and  Director  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:

     (1)  the  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.




                                 /S/"Lucien R. Paquette",
                                   ----------------------
                                   Lucien R. Paquette
                     Chief  Accounting  Officer,  Chief  Financial  Officer
                            Secretary  Treasurer  and  Director

Date: January 12, 2004
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of SRA International, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William L. Ballhaus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  August 17, 2012 | /S/ WILLIAM L. BALLHAUS              
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                       | William L. Ballhaus                  
|                       | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       | (Principal Executive Officer)
# Appendix 1. Replicates
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 18

December 3, 2002


To the Board of Directors of
Evans Systems, Inc.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements included in Evans Systems,
Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002 and
issued our report thereon dated December 3, 2003. Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements describes a change in the Corporation's method of
determining the cost of inventories from the last-in, first out to the first-in,
first-out method. It should be understood that the preferability of one
acceptable method of accounting inventory over another has not been addressed in
any authoritative accounting literature and in arriving at our opinion expressed
below, we have relied on management's business planning and judgment. Based on
our discussions with management and the stated reasons for the change, we
believe that such change represents, in your circumstances, the adoption of a
preferable alternative accounting principle for inventories in conformity with
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Stephenson & Trlicek, P.C.
-----------------------------------
Stephenson & Trlicek, P.C.
Wharton, Texas
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




To the Board of Directors of
Mid Ocean Limited


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-78626) on Form S-8 and Form S-3 of Mid Ocean Limited of our report dated
November 21, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Mid Ocean
Limited and subsidiaries as of October 31, 1997 and 1996 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three year period ended October 31, 1997 and our report
dated November 21, 1997 on the schedules included in Form 10-K which reports
appear in the October 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Mid Ocean Limited
by reference.




KPMG Peat Marwick
Chartered Accountants
Hamilton, Bermuda
January 27, 1998
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE

FIVE THINGS

U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Justice Programs

National Institute of Justice

1. Crime is rarely random; patrols shouldn’t be either. 

Focusing on small geographic locations and times when crimes 

occur and targeting specific, high-impact repeat offenders can 

decrease crime.

2. Quality is more important than speed.

In most cases, thorough investigations, problem solving and careful 

forensic evidence collection contribute more to arresting suspects 

than shaving a few seconds off of initial response times. 

3. DNA works for property crimes, too.

Collecting and using DNA evidence substantially increases the likelihood of solving property crimes — leading to twice as many arrests 

and twice as many cases being accepted for prosecution than in 

non-DNA “traditional” investigations.

LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVES CAN DO TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE

Office of Justice Programs • Innovation • Partnerships • Safer Neighborhoods

4. In police work, perceptions matter. 

When people see the police as fair, lawful and respectful, officers 

are safer and citizens are more likely to obey the law and comply 

with police orders. For example, the way an officer treats a stopped 

motorist influences the motorist’s opinion about law enforcement 

more than whether the officer issues a citation.

5. Make officer safety and wellness a priority. 

Safety training, certain shift lengths and using body armor can 

prevent injuries and save lives. For example, the “Shift Length 

Experiment” study showed that officers who worked 10-hour shifts 

(compared to 8- and 12-hour shifts) made fewer errors and worked 

less overtime, saving money for the jurisdiction.

Use the Five Things to make your community and officers safer and your leadership more dynamic. Following the guidance in the 

Five Things will heighten your impact and lower your costs overall. 

The Five Things in this flyer come from years of research, analysis, testing and evaluation.

To learn more, visit NIJ.gov, keyword “Five Things.”

NIJ is the research, development and evaluation agency of the U.S. Department of Justice. NIJ provides objective, independent, 

evidence-based knowledge and tools to enhance the administration of justice and public safety. 

The Police Foundation advances policing through innovation and science.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

TheBoard of Directors

Merge Technologies Incorporated:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-34884, 333-100104, 333-107997, 333-40832, 333-40882,333-107991, 333-125386) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-125603) on Form S-3 of MergeTechnologies Incorporated of our reports dated March 8, 2007, with respect tothe consolidated balance sheets of Merge Technologies Incorporated as ofDecember 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, shareholders’ equity, comprehensive income (loss), and cash flowsfor each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006,  management’s assessment of the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Merge Technologies Incorporated.  

Ourreport dated March 8, 2007, on management's assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, expresses ouropinion that Merge Technologies Incorporated did not maintain effectiveinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 because ofthe effects of material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of thecontrol criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states thatmanagement identified and included in management's assessment materialweaknesses relating to an ineffective control environment, revenue recognition,income taxes, business combinations, and the implementation of a new accountingsystem.

Ourreport on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption of theprovisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised2004), *Share-Based Payment*, on January 1,2006.

| /s/ KPMG LLP       |   |   |
|--------------------|--------|--------|
| Chicago, Illinois  |   |
| March 8, 2007 |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



In connection with the Annual Report of Rural/Metro Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack E. Brucker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 14, 2007



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|                                                     
|/S/    JACK E. BRUCKER                               
|Jack E. Brucker President and Chief Executive Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1000-1001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-274]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Undergraduate Education; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Division of Undergraduate 
Education.
    Date and Time:

January 29, 1997; 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
January 30, 1997; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
January 31, 1997; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
February 1, 1997; 8:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
February 5, 1997; 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
February 6, 1997; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
February 7, 1997; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
February 8, 1997; 8:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Place: The Doubletree Hotel, 300 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 
22202.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Duncan McBride, Section Head; Dr. Daniel 
Hodge, Program Director, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 306-1666.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate unsolicited proposals submitted 
to the Instrumentation and Laboratory Improvement Panel Meeting.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as

[[Page 1001]]

salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 
552b.(c)(4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 2, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-274 Filed 1-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```