alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54821-54822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 75-97]


Proposed Foreign-Trade Zone--Gregg County, Texas; Application and 
Public Hearing

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board (the Board) by Gregg County, Texas, to establish a general-
purpose foreign-trade zone in Gregg County, Texas, adjacent to the 
Shreveport-Bossier Customs port of entry. The application was submitted 
pursuant to the provisions of the FTZ Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-
81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR Part 400). It was 
formally filed on October 14, 1997. The applicant is authorized to make 
the proposal under Senate Bill 691 of the 70th Legislature of the State 
of Texas (Regular Session, 1987), codified as Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. 
art. 1446.01.
    The proposed zone site (299 acres) is located at the Gregg County 
Airport, approximately 4 miles south of the City of Longview, Texas. It 
is owned by the applicant. The proposed FTZ project is designed to 
serve the entire East Texas Region consisting of fourteen counties. 
(This would be the second foreign-trade zone associated with the 
Shreveport-Bossier Customs port of entry. FTZ 145 in Shreveport was 
established in 1988.)
    The application contains evidence of the need for foreign-trade 
zone services in the East Texas Region. Several firms have indicated an 
interest in using zone procedures for warehousing/distribution 
activity. Specific manufacturing approvals are not being sought at this 
time. Requests would be made to the Board on a case-by-case basis.
    In accordance with the Board's regulations, a member of the FTZ 
Staff has been designated examiner to investigate the application and 
report to the Board.
    As part of the investigation, the Commerce examiner will hold a 
public hearing on November 20, 1997, 2:00 p.m., Gregg County 
Courthouse, 101 E. Methvin Street, Longview, Texas 75601.

[[Page 54822]]

    Public comment on the application is invited from interested 
parties. Submissions (original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the 
Board's Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period 
for their receipt is December 22, 1997. Rebuttal comments in response 
to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted 
during the subsequent 15-day period (to January 5, 1997).
    A company of the application and accompanying exhibits will be 
available during this time for public inspection at the following 
locations:

Gregg County Courthouse 101 E. Methvin Street, Suite 300 Longview, 
Texas 75601
Office of the Executive Secretary Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 3716 
U.S. Department of Commerce 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, 
DC 20230

    Dated: October 15, 1997.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27989 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
No. 00-7386.

#### Quang Ly Tran *v.*Konteh, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 15.2





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company’s previously filed
      Registration Statements (File Numbers 333-131314, 333-128173, 333-128875,
      333-128873 and 33-11828) our report dated August 25, 2006, relating to the
      consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of April 30, 2006 and 2005 and
      the
      related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash
      flows for each of the three years ended April 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004
      respectively, appearing in the Company’s Form 6-K filed on August 31, 2006 (File
      No. 000-21978 ).








/s/
      BDO
      Stoy Hayward LLP


________________________


BDO
      Stoy
      Hayward LLP


London,
      England








November
      14, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PDV AMERICA,
INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          20,751
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,448,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,146
<INVENTORY>                                  1,156,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,625,486
<PP&E>                                       4,582,924
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,285,647)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,635,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,177,961
<BONDS>                                      1,518,639
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,789,205
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,635,178
<SALES>                                     22,157,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,269,333
<CGS>                                       21,370,315
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,597,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,808
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,651
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             149,169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                519,399
<INCOME-TAX>                                   183,130
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            336,269
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   336,269
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.3

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the inclusion of our report dated January 24, 1997, on the
financial statements of Kansas Combined Cellular in this Form 10-K and to the
incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K, in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-3 (Nos. 33-62787 and 333-56645), Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (No. 333-03107), and Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
33-57077, 33-57081, 33-57083, 33-64553, 333-10389, 333-17891, 333-36339,
333-50541, and 333-67035), of AirTouch Communications, Inc. We have not audited
any financial statements of Kansas Combined Cellular subsequent to December 31,
1996, nor performed any procedures subsequent to the date of our report.



/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Kansas City, Missouri,
March 29, 1999
#### R. D. JEFFRIES, Petitioner, v. Albert WASHINGTON et al., Respondents.

No. 40565.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 25, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I,
Zeinal Abedin Mahommed Bava, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors
and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
April 30, 2012

By:

/s/ ZEINAL ABEDIN MAHOMMED BAVAName:

Zeinal Abedin Mahommed BavaTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JEAN ARRISSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1015

[August 12, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Kirk C. Volker, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502007CF014369DXXXMB.

Jean Arrisson, Indiantown, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessica L. 

Underwood, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
June 15, 2015

Mr. Kevin Jones 405 Rolling Hill Cleburne, TX 76033

Dear Mr. Jones :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 4, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 2083), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### C. D. W., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 10, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Kurt Marmar, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Margarita Esquiroz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and NATHAN and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, C. D. W., a juvenile seeks reversal of an order denying his motion to dismiss the petition for delinquency filed against him and subsequent adjudication of delinquency on the ground that the petition was filed in the circuit court in excess of 30 days from the date on which the complaint against him was received by the intake office of the Division of Youth Services. The State confesses error.

Upon the authority of Section 39.05(7), Florida Statutes (1975) and *S. R. v. State,*346 So.2d 1018 (Fla.1977), we find that the petition should have been dismissed with prejudice and, therefore, reverse the adjudication of delinquency.

Reversed.
Exhibit (h)(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Financial Services Firm (“you” or “Intermediary”),

 

As principal underwriter of the DWS Funds, we (or a predecessor firm) or our affiliate have entered into a selling group or other agreement or agreements (the "Agreement") with you to permit you, as applicable, to sell, service, or facilitate trading in shares of the DWS Funds (collectively, the "Shares").  

 

This amendment to the Agreement is entered into as of the date indicated in the signature block below, with an effective date of October 16, 2007, or such earlier date as of which you begin providing the Shareholder information described below, and includes the following provisions: 

 

**1. Agreement to Provide Information.**Intermediary agrees to provide the Fund, upon written request, the taxpayer identification number (“TIN”), the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (“ITIN”), or other government-issued identifier (“GII”), if known, of any or all Shareholder(s) of the account and the amount, date, name or other identifier of any investment professional(s) associated with the Shareholder(s) or account (if known), and transaction type (purchase, redemption, transfer, or exchange) of every purchase, redemption, transfer, or exchange of Shares held through each account maintained by the Intermediary during the period covered by the request.

 

**2. Period Covered by Request.**Requests must set forth a specific period, not to exceed 90 days from the date of the request, for which transaction information is sought. The Fund may request transaction information older than 90 days from the date of the request as it deems necessary to investigate compliance with policies established by the Fund for the purpose of eliminating or reducing any dilution of the value of the outstanding shares issued by the Fund.

 

**3. Form and Timing of Response.**

 

(a)  Intermediary agrees to provide, promptly upon request of the Fund or its designee, the requested information specified in paragraph 1 above. If requested by the Fund or its designee, Intermediary agrees to use best efforts to determine promptly whether any specific person about whom it has received the identification and transaction information specified in paragraph 1 is itself a financial intermediary (“indirect intermediary”) and, upon further request of the Fund or its designee, promptly either (i) provide 

 

----
#### Kenneth ADAMS v. RALPH WALKER, INC., et al.

No. 50172.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 19, 1978.

Dixon L. Pyles, Jackson, for appellant.

Daniel, Coker, Horton, Bell & Dukes, Jackson H. Abies, III, Roger C. Clapp, Jackson, for appellees.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of iParty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350
that to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














Date:
August 6, 2009




/s/ DAVID ROBERTSONDavid
      RobertsonChief
      Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RAFAEL ALBERTO LLOVERA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-826

[February 7, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Barry Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 17CF010042AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack and Zaheeda 

Mohammed, Assistant Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. 

Napodano, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
P. 1


# OAR Box 1103 Prepped by Ryan Dugan



### Document

Number: 

# 93 ) IV-C-5 Docket Number: 

# A-83-4 1

Printed 4/11/20081:50:51 PM

Sheet 93 of 174P. 2

:£ B 

### - 3 

### 199 5

•-* ~% tog * Dian e D'Arrigo , Directo r Radioactiv e Wast e Projec t Nuclea r Informatio n& Resourc e . ' * Service s 142 4 16t hStreet , NW , Suit e 60 1 Washington , D C 2003 6 Dea r Ms . D'Arrigo : Thi s i s i nrespons e t o you r lette r o f January26 , 1995 , requesting a nextensio no f thre e month s i nth e commen t perio d o n th e Environmenta l Protectio nAgency' s (EPA ) propose d recommenda

tion s o nFedera l Radiatio nProtectio nGuidanc e fo r Exposur e o f th e Genera l Public . . '.'''. " W e hav e carefull yconsidere d you r reques t fo r a nextensio no f th e forma l perio d o f commen t o nthes e propose d recommenda-tions , an d hav e decide d no t t o gran t you r reques t a t thi s time . W e wil l re-evaluat e thi s decisio nfollowing th e publi c hearing t o b e hel d February22-23 , 1995 , i nWashington , DC . Pleas e b e assured , however , tha t w e wil l mak e everyeffor t t o conside r comment s receive d afte r th e expiratio no f th e forma l commen t period , an d tha t th e proces s o f developing fina l recommendation s wil l extend wel l pas t th e extensio nyo u hav e requested . Sincerely ,
Alla nCB . Richardso n Deput yDirecto r fo r Federa l Guidanc e Criteri a & Standard s Divisio n Offic e o f Radiatio nProgram s Enclosur e
#### Grady C. RUSSELL, Appellant, v. Annie L. Russell FLOYD and James Floyd, her husband, Appellees.

No. 69-382.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 9, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3035 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for gender transition in minors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 4, 2023 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mr. 

RUBIO, Mr. DAINES, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. CRUZ, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for gender transition 

in minors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Our Kids 

5 from Harmful Research Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR 

7 GENDER TRANSITION IN MINORS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, no Federal funds may be used to fund re10 search or publications relating to gender transition in indiVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:58 Oct 05, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3035.IS S3035

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3035 IS

1 viduals under the age of 18, including any observational 

2 studies that gather evidence on the provision of hormonal 

3 treatments or surgical procedures on minors, for the pur4 pose of— 

5 (1) affirming a minor’s perception of his or her 

6 sex, if that perception is incongruent with such mi7 nor’s sex; or 

8 (2) affirming a minor’s asserted identity, if the 

9 asserted identity is incongruent with such minor’s 

10 sex. 

11 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the 

12 term ‘‘sex’’ shall be recognized based solely on a person’s 

13 reproductive biology and genetics at birth. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE>
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                        DIRECT AND INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES

                                       OF

                                STANT CORPORATION
                          ----------------------------

<CAPTION>

                                                               Jurisdiction of
Name                                         % of Ownership     Incorporation
----                                         --------------    ---------------
<S>                                               <C>            <C>
Epicor Industries, Inc.                           100            Delaware
   Aplicadores Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V.            100             Mexico
   Auto Industrial de Partes, S.A. de C.V.        100             Mexico
   Edelmann, S.A. de C.V.                         100             Mexico
Fedco Automotive Components Company, Inc.         100            Delaware
Standard-Thomson Corporation                      100            Delaware
   Thomson International Corporation              100            Delaware
Stant Manufacturing Inc.                          100            Delaware
Trico Products Corporation                        100            New York
   Trico Latinoamericana S.A.                     100            Argentina
   Trico Holding Corporation                      100            Delaware
        Trico Technologies Corporation            100            Delaware
           Trico Componentes, S.A. de C.V.        100             Mexico
   Trico International Limited                    100              Guam
   Trico Limited                                  100              U.K.
        Trico Developments Co. Ltd.               100              U.K.
        Trico Products Ltd.                       100              U.K.
   Trico Pty. Ltd.                                100            Australia


</TABLE>














                                      E-89