alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
13.1




CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Grupo Radio Centro, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital
variable organized under the laws of Mexico (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the
“Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      June 30, 2010
              /s/ Carlos Aguirre G.Carlos
      Aguirre G.Director
      General, Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      June 30, 2010
              /s/ Pedro Beltrán NasrPedro
      Beltrán NasrChief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Presidential Documents

53529

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 199

Wednesday, October 15, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 7037 of October 10, 1997

White Cane Safety Day, 1997

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

As we stand at the dawn of the 21st century, new technologies are rapidly

changing and improving the lives of Americans. For one group of Americans

in particular—those who are blind or visually impaired—these technologies

have opened doors to unparalleled opportunities. Blind Americans now

can more readily access information of all kinds, and these advances have

brought important improvements to the education, careers, and daily lives

of blind and visually impaired people.

In this time of extraordinary progress, however, the simple yet profoundly

useful white cane remains an indispensable tool and symbol of independence

that has afforded countless blind and visually impaired citizens the opportunity to pursue the American Dream. And so, as we all share in a new

era of expanded technological innovations that improve the lives of all

of our Nation’s citizens, we also celebrate the white cane for its ability

to empower and recognize it as the embodiment of freedom.

As a Nation, let us also reassert our commitment to ensuring equal opportunity, equal access, and full participation of citizens with disabilities in

our community life. This year, we celebrated the reauthorization of the

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, reaffirming our belief that all

students can learn and must have the opportunities and resources necessary

to do so. And we must continue to enforce vigorously the Americans with

Disabilities Act, so that our blind and visually impaired fellow citizens

enjoy equal opportunity, access to public and private services and accommodations, and a workplace free of discrimination.

To honor the numerous achievements of blind and visually impaired citizens

and to recognize the significance of the white cane in advancing independence, the Congress, by joint resolution approved October 6, 1964, has designated October 15 of each year as ‘‘White Cane Safety Day.’’

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, do hereby proclaim October 15, 1997, as White Cane Safety

Day. I call upon the people of the United States, government officials,

educators, and business leaders to observe this day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this tenth day of

October, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-seven, and

of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 97–27492

Filed 10–14–97; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and twenty-second.

œ–
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PAUL COOPER )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) C.A. No. 06-80 ERIE

)

JAMES VESHECCO, et al., )

Respondents. )

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2006,

This Court is in receipt of Petitioner's recent filing stating that he did not receive the

Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter until after the ten

day period for filing of Objections had elapsed. 

As Petitioner indicates that he will "respect the procedure pertaining to exhausting

state remedies" and does not seek leave to file Objections, this Court will take no further action. 

S/ Sean J. McLaughlin 

 Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00080-SJM-SPB Document 14 Filed 10/12/06 Page 1 of 1
1

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SENECA RESOURCES CORP., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 09-154 Erie

)

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, ) Judge Sean J. McLaughlin

)

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, SEAN J., J.

This matter is before the Court upon the Motion for Leave to Intervene pursuant to Rule 24

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed on November 29, 2009, by the Sierra Club and the

Allegheny Defense Project. Plaintiff, Seneca Resources Corporation, filed a Memorandum in

Opposition on December 23, 2009.

The proposed intervenors seek to intervene in this action based upon Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 24(a)(2), which provides for intervention as a matter of right, and Rule 24(b), which

allows for permissive intervention. Rule 24(a)(2) provides in pertinent part: 

(a) Intervention of Right. Upon timely application anyone shall be

permitted to intervene in an action . . . (2) when the applicant claims

an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject

of the action and the applicant is so situated that the disposition of the

action may as a practical matter impair or impede the applicant’s

ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant’s interest is

adequately represented by existing parties.

Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 24(a)(2). The Third Circuit has interpreted Rule 24(a) to require proof of four

elements from the party or parties seeking intervention: “first, a timely application for leave to

intervene; second, a sufficient interest in the litigation; third, a threat that the interest will be

impaired or affected, as a practical matter, by the disposition of the action; and fourth, inadequate

representation of the prospective intervener’s interest by the existing parties to the litigation.”

Kleissler v. United States Forest Service, 157 F.3d 964, 969 (3 Cir. 1998) (citing, e.g., Mountain rd

Case 1:09-cv-00154-SJM Document 32 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 2
2

Top Condo. Ass’n. v. Dave Stabbert Master Builder, Inc., 72 F.3d 361, 365-66 (3 Cir. 1995)). rd

Alternatively, Rule 24(b) provides that, “[o]n timely motion, the court may permit anyone

to intervene who . . . has a claim or defense that shares with the main action a common question of

law or fact.” Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 24(b)(1)(B). Although the proposed interveners’ interests are likely

to be adequately represented by the United States Forest Service in this matter, I nonetheless exercise

my discretion and grant the intervenors’ application for permissive intervention because the

Allegheny Defense Project and Sierra Club each share “a common question of law or fact” with the

“main action.” See, e.g., Kiamichi R.R. v. National Mediation Bd., 986 F.2d 1341, 1345 (10 Cir. th

1993). 

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, the Motion for Leave to Intervene is GRANTED.

/s/ Sean J. McLaughlin 

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record. ___

 

Case 1:09-cv-00154-SJM Document 32 Filed 01/04/10 Page 2 of 2
II 

Calendar No. 479 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3277 

To amend the Marine Debris Act to reauthorize the Marine Debris Program 

of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2023 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. PETERS) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Reported by Ms. CANTWELL, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Marine Debris Act to reauthorize the Marine 

Debris Program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3277 RS

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE MARINE DEBRIS 

2 PROGRAM OF THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND 

3 ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION. 

4 Section 9(a) of the Marine Debris Act (33 U.S.C. 

5 1958(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘for’’ the first place it 

6 appears and all that follows through ‘‘carrying out’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2028 for 

8 carrying out’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 479 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3277 

A BILL 

To amend the Marine Debris Act to reauthorize the 

and Atmospheric Administration. Marine Debris Program of the National Oceanic 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00516

- CR

Moses Eli AVILA , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 144th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR7607 Honorable Lorina I. Rummel , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 3, 2018
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION The trial court imposed sentence in Cause No. 2017CR7607 on March 20, 2018. Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on April 19,
2018. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on May 4, 3028. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.3. On July 16, 2018, appellant filed a “Motion for Leave to File Late Notice of Appeal/Continuance.” Because the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (holding04

- 18

- 00516

- CR

- 2

- that if appeal is not timely perfected, court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address merits of appeal, and court may take no action other than to dismiss appeal; court may not suspend rules to alter time for perfecting appeal); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519 , 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) ; 1 see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs
out

- of

- time appeal s from felony convictions).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH

1 We also note t he trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the criminal case is a plea

- bargain case. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Proce dure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 25.2(d).
Our Ref. 307 1 6/DRE/AM-PDC 

Subject: Declaration of Reciprocity 

Pear Mr. Gretcli 

Mr . . Paul Gretch 

Director, Office of the Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Aff111fra 

US Department of Tratl&portalion 

400 7'h Street, S.W.Room 6402 

Washington, DC 20590 

Llsboa, 30 January, 2015 

The National Institute of Civil Aviation herewith confirms that this civil aviation authority will 

grant, on the basis of reciprocity, to any tarrior designated by the United States of America 

the right to conduct third, fourth and fifth freedom non-scheduled (charter) passengers flights 

fo/frcm Portugal In conformity with the Air Transport Agreement between the European 

Union and the United States of America, signed In Brussels on the 251h of April of 2007 and 

In Washington, on the 30111 of April of 2007. 

The present Declaration of Reciprocity Is valid for a period of six (6) months as from 

February 01, 20115. 

Yours aincersly 

L.TS/FB/IF 

RUI 8 , i dlllt.fn 4 -AIIroporlo d1 Pall I~~ • \1~ 03 ~ Lie boa · F'ORTUOAL 

NIPC • 504 288 808 

Tel,t+OSt) 1 042 G 00 ' Fox (351121 8~0 23 Bd 

\V\WJ lnac.pt • 4•matt lnacgorel«t(nao.nt
ADDENDUM NO. 1 : -i This addendum modifies the Grant Agreement between the U.S. Department

### ofT~arisp6Hatiori 1 \ and the Manistee Blacker Airport Authority, in association with the**Community:<;>±~~-.,.,** ,., ,-, __ Manistee/Lundington, Michigan, under the Alternative Essential Air Service**:Prdgr~trf** 5 ':.- '-' u (Agreement), which was entered into by the Parties on May 3, 2012. The following modifications are agreed to by the Parties and hereby made to the Agreement, pursuant to Section 3, paragraph (g) ofthe Agreement: Replace Section 4, paragraph (b)(ii) with the following: ii. 

### Inits agreements with the carrier, the Grantee will ensure that ifthe carrier terminates service during the first year ofservice under this Agreement, the carrier shall pay the Grantee a pro-rataportion ofthe $200,000 start-up costs based on the number ofmonths remaining during the first year of this Agreement. All prorated funds the Grantee receives from the carrier will be reimbursed to DOT. Replace Section 4, paragraph (c) with the following:

c. Completed Flight Segments: 1.

.During the first five months ofthe first year ofservice, DOT will reimburse the Grantee $77.82 perpassenger seat flown for up to 24,971 passenger seats [($2,143,294-$200,000)/24,971]. 

### ii. During the remainder ofthe first year ofservice, DOTwill reimburse the Grantee $194.55 per passenger seats flown with a maximum of 1,140 seats per month ($221,787 per month). 111. During the entire first year ofservice, no more than $1,943,294 shall be reimbursed to the Grantee for passenger seats flown. IV. During the second year ofservice, DOT will pay the Grantee $106.18 per passenger seat flown for up to 19,361 passenger seats. ($2,055,781/19,361).

The Parties agree and understand that the U.S. Department ofTransportation will not provide any additional reimbursements for start-up costs incurred for starting the service except for any prorated funds returned to the Department pursuant to Section 

### 4, paragraph (b)(ii).-2-

·oated:.

__ f_J.(



# (_2_0-1--/_1_2-

___ ,2012 Manistee Blacker Airpmt Authority 

# /f/

# /J> // By:

## fl-a_//~--- Paul D. Schulert Chairman Manistee BlackerAirport Authority

Dated:_--J_/.!_1

# ,/-/__:__;-+~/-/-,/_} l_-_-_, 2012 U.S. Department ofTransportation

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and Intemational Affairs
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2724 

To repeal the authority under the National Labor Relations Act for States 

to enact laws prohibiting agreements requiring membership in a labor 

organization as a condition of employment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2023 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. PADILLA, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. MARKEY, 

Mr. CARDIN, Mr. BOOKER, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. BROWN, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. HIRONO, Ms. SMITH, Mr. 

FETTERMAN, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. MERKLEY, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and Mr. 

WELCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To repeal the authority under the National Labor Relations 

Act for States to enact laws prohibiting agreements requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nationwide Right To 

5 Unionize Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2724 IS

1 SEC. 2. PREEMPTING STATE RIGHT-TO-WORK LAWS. 

2 Subsection (b) of section 14 of the National Labor 

3 Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 164) is repealed. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**








I,
      Susan
      Luckfield, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Net
      Perceptions, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of Net Perceptions, Inc.




Date:
              August
              8, 2006
            By:
            /s/
              Susan LuckfieldName:Susan
              LuckfieldTitle:
              Controller*(Principal Financial
              Officer)*






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






23
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nicklebys.com,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  March  31,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'),  I, Bruce
Capra, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Bruce Capra
----------------------------
Bruce Capra
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003
# L_2005256EN.01005501.xml

| 1.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 256/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 256/55

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 20 September 2005

appointing two members and an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2005/678/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Estonian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 January 2002 the Council adopted Decision 2002/60/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2002 to 25 January 2006 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 January 2002 the Council adopted Decision 2002/60/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2002 to 25 January 2006 (1).

| (2) | Two seats as members of the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the resignations of Mr Andrus ANSIP and Mr Edgar SAVISAAR and one seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the nomination of Mr Väino HALLIKMÄGI as a member, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Two seats as members of the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the resignations of Mr Andrus ANSIP and Mr Edgar SAVISAAR and one seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the nomination of Mr Väino HALLIKMÄGI as a member,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of their term of office, namely until 25 January 2006:

| (a) | as members: | Mr Väino HALLIKMÄGI
  Member of the Council of Pärnu
  in place of Mr Andrus ANSIP |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as members:

Mr Väino HALLIKMÄGI

Member of the Council of Pärnu

in place of Mr Andrus ANSIP

| | Mr Tõnis PALTS
  Mayor of Tallinn
  in place of Mr Edgar SAVISAAR |
| --- | --- |

Mr Tõnis PALTS

Mayor of Tallinn

in place of Mr Edgar SAVISAAR

| (b) | as alternate member:
  Ms Laine JÄNES
  Mayor of Tartu
  in place of Mr Väino HALLIKMÄGI |
| --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

Ms Laine JÄNES

Mayor of Tartu

in place of Mr Väino HALLIKMÄGI

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 September 2005.

For the Council

The President

M. BECKETT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 26.1.2002, p. 38.

1

---
#### Edwin OSWALT v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50390.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 12, 1978.

Joseph C. Gibbs, Clarksdale, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Calvin Coolidge Williams, Jr., Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON,'C. J., SMITH, P. J, and BROOM, LEE, BOWLING and COFER, JJ., concurring.
EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements of
ProxyMed, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-77793, 333-58311,
333-11179, 333-34645 and 33-95454) and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-04717 and
333-50391) of our report dated February 19, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of ProxyMed,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for each of the
three years ended December 31, 1998 which report is included in this annual
report on Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Miami, Florida
June 18, 1999