alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350)**





In
      connection with this Report of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
      Daniels, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
                September 5, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Mark DanielsMark
                DanielsChief
                Executive Officer
#### FLINTKOTE COMPANY, Appellant, v. R. W. TEDDER and Florida Bank at Fort Pierce, Appellees.

No. 39657.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 16, 1970.

Appeal dismissed. 232 So.2d 194.

ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Alabama Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan

A Vision That Supports Safe Pedestrian Crossings in Alabama

Figure Source: Modified from Alabama Statewide 

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, 2017

Image Source: Alabama Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, 2017

Intersection and Crossing Design Strategies

Summary 

The purpose of this plan is to establish a vision for 

bicycling and walking as modes of transportation 

in Alabama. The graphic below summarizes key 

strategies, as found in the plan, for improving safety 

at pedestrian crossings.

Highlights

INCLUSIVE VISION STATEMENT: Alabama is a State 

where walking and bicycling are safe, comfortable, 

and convenient modes of transportation for people 

of all ages and abilities. (p. B-1)

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Reduce the number and 

severity of crashes over a multi-year period as well 

as crash rates and comparative rankings with peer 

States. (p. C-5; Table ES-3)

PRIORITIZATION: Incorporate pedestrian and bicycle 

safety in project prioritization process. (p. C-5)

Sponsoring Agency: Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT)

Plan Date: 2017

URL: https://www.dot.state.al.us/oeweb/pdf/bicyclePedestrian/StatewideBicyclePedestrianPlan.pdf

FHWA-SA-18-052

INSTITUTIONALIZATION: Incorporate bicycle and 

pedestrian needs in all phases of project 

development, routine maintenance, and system 

preservation. (p. B-1)

TECHNICAL TRAINING: Provide technical training on 

pedestrian and bicycle facility planning and design. 

(p. C-5)

COORDINATION WITH LOCAL JURISDICTIONS: Target 

bicycle and pedestrian improvements along State 

highway corridors that are identified in local and 

regional plans, or in consultation with local officials. 

(p. B-1)
#### 79TH STREET HOTEL, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. June DuPUIS, et al., Respondents.

No. 39506.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 4, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 231 So.2d 532.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Ken E. BASSO et al., Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. R-197, R-198 and R-199.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 12, 1973.

Rehearing Denied July 31, 1973.

Joseph A. Scarlett, DeLand, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen, and Andrew W. Lindsey, Asst. Atty. Gen, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

These causes having been orally argued before the Court the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the orders of the lower court appealed from herein are affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K, Acting C. J, and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ, concur.
# Den Europæiske Unions C 104I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 104I |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 64. årgang26. marts 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 104I

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

64. årgang26. marts 2021

---

| Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Oplysninger |
| | OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER, ORGANER, KONTORER OG AGENTURER |
| | Europa-Kommissionen |
| 2021/C 104 I/01 | Forklarende bemærkninger til Den Europæiske Unions kombinerede nomenklatur | 1 |

Indhold

Side

IV   Oplysninger

OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER, ORGANER, KONTORER OG AGENTURER

Europa-Kommissionen

2021/C 104 I/01

Forklarende bemærkninger til Den Europæiske Unions kombinerede nomenklatur

1

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

IV Oplysninger

OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER, ORGANER, KONTORER OG AGENTURER

Europa-Kommissionen

| 26.3.2021 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CI 104/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2021

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CI 104/1

---

Forklarende bemærkninger til Den Europæiske Unions kombinerede nomenklatur

(2021/C 104 I/01)

I medfør af artikel 9, stk. 1, litra a), i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2658/87 (1) foretages følgende ændringer i de forklarende bemærkninger til Den Europæiske Unions kombinerede nomenklatur (2):

På side 369:

I den forklarende bemærkning til underpos. 8543 70 90 udgår andet afsnit.

På side 416:

I den forklarende bemærkning til 9506 69 90 udgår andet og tredje afsnit og erstattes af følgende:

"Denne underposition omfatter dog ikke såkaldte »anti-stressbolde«, der har form som en bold og kan være dekoreret på forskellig vis. De fremstilles normalt af plast eller gummi og er beregnet til at blive klemt gentagne gange i hånden som en anti-stressøvelse. »Anti-stressbolde« og lignende »anti-stressprodukter« med forskellige former og design, tariferes i pos. 9503.

---

(1)  Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2658/87 af 23. juli 1987 om told- og statistiknomenklaturen og Den Fælles Toldtarif (EFT L 256 af 7.9.1987, s. 1).

(2)  EUT C 119 af 29.3.2019, s. 1.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-81128, No. 333-60500, No. 333-51856, No. 333-116658, No. 333-11179, No.
333-36982, No. 333-95883, No. 333-88671, No. 333-77793, No. 333-58311, and No.
333-34645 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements No. 333-113436, No. 333-89764,
No. 333-92905, No. 333-50391, No. 333-34711, and No. 333-04717 on Form S-8 and
Registration Statement No. 333-2678 on Form SB-2 of our reports relating to the
consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule
of ProxyMed, Inc. and its subsidiaries (d/b/a MedAvant Healthcare Solutions) and
management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting dated March 14, 2006, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
ProxyMed, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ DeLoitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 14, 2006
#### NATIONAL TRUCK BROKERS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. LONGHAUL, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-329.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 15, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-01-1999
<CASH>                                          33,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,600
<INVENTORY>                                     38,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,800
<PP&E>                                         665,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 374,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 530,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,000
<BONDS>                                        407,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (94,400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   530,700
<SALES>                                      1,232,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,232,000
<CGS>                                          362,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,173,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
23.1








Consent of Grant Thornton
LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We have
issued our report dated December 11, 2009, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and included in the Annual Report of Key
Technology, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2009.  We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Key Technology,
Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-71108, 333-152506, 333-50130, 333-128512, and
333-2396).




/s/ GRANT
THORNTON LLP





Seattle,
Washington


December
11, 2009
The Honorable Penny S. Pritzker 

Secretary of Commerce 

U.S. Department of Commerce 

1401 Constitution Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20230 

Docket# DOC-2015-0001 

The Honorable John Kerry 

Secretary of State 

U.S. Department of State 

2201 C St., NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

Docltet # DOS-2015-00 16 

Dear Secretary Kerry, Secretary Foxx and Secretary Pritzker: 

On behalf of LTD Hospitality Group I am writing to urge you to continue to support the Open Ski es 

agreement with the UAE and not reopen negotiations based on the concerns of three U.S. air 

carriers. My employees and I travel quite often to India for business and we value the access to 

cities throughout India afforded by our Open Skies agreements with the UAE and Qatar. A 

renegotiation will jeopardize commerce, diminish our close cultural interactions and impede travel 

between the Washington, DC area and these destinations. 

Open Skies is an important free trade policy. For decades, such agreements have opened foreign 

destinations to air travel, without government regulation of routes, pricing, or carrier operations. 

The policy has been a resounding success. Competition under Open Skies has helped expand 

consumer choice and controll ed fares. It is upsetting to think that the U.S. would now reconsider 

this approach based solely on the self-interest of three airlines. 

Washington DC residents of Indian descent have benefited from Open Skies. Many of us fly on Gulf 

States airlines. In some cases, the choice is driven by cost-savings, but often it is the more direct 

routes, fewer connections, or truly impressive amenities that are available. These airlines offer 

many welcome alternatives to connections in Mumbai and Delhi, and this factor alone has attracted 

many Indian-American business travelers and tourists. 

The motivation of the big U.S. carriers in attacking Open Skies is clear: Gulf States airlines are 

beating them in fair, head-to-head competition, and it's not by simply undercutting them on price. 

Rather than rising to the challenge, the major U.S. airlines would prefer the U.S. government to bail 

them out by reworking Open Skies to their specifications. Such interventio nism aligns neither with 

American values nor the country's best interests. ~ ~~LTD ~~~ H 0 S P I T A ll T Y G R 0 U P ADDRESS 1564 Crossways Boulevard ,Chesapeake, VA 23320 PHONE 757.420.0900 FAX 757.420.093 1 W EB www.ltdhospitality.com A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 
Sincerely, 

anaging Principal 

D Hospitality Group
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1996, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
10KSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         147,471
<SECURITIES>                                    35,212
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               354,198
<PP&E>                                       7,783,021
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,316,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,332,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          605,743
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,733,155
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,772,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     220,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,332,223
<SALES>                                      3,545,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,545,611
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,692,471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,061,855)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,139,752)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,139,752)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Description of performance bonus arrangement for executive officers for the
year ending December 31, 2000 ("2000"):

The bonus plan for 2000 is based on two components: 1) Return on Capital and 2)
Unit Growth.  Bonuses (if any) are to be calculated and paid quarterly, based
upon stand alone quarterly results.  Potential bonuses are also to be
calculated on full year amounts at year end, with such year end calculation
determined at four times the applicable quarterly rate, less any interim
payments.  No return of a prior bonus is required if the full year
calculation yields less than the sum of prior quarter payments.

Return on Capital ("ROC") is defined to equal, for the applicable time period
calculated, the product of (a) income from operations before bonus accruals
pursuant to this plan (either for the full year, or annualized by multiplying
quarterly pre-bonus income from operations by four, as applicable), divided by
(b) the sum of (i) average shareholders' equity and (ii) average funded debt.
If ROC is 5% or greater, the ROC bonus shall be actual ROC for the applicable
period times the employee's full year base salary.

Unit Growth is to equal actual unit volume for the applicable quarterly or
full year period, less actual unit volume for the comparable prior year
period, divided by actual unit volume for the comparable prior year period.
The Unit Growth component of the applicable employee's bonus shall be
determined as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   If Unit                 the ROC Bonus is at least as follows,
  Growth is      and           then Unit Growth Bonus % is:
--------------		------------------------------------------
                              5%          10%         15%
                             ----        -----       -----
<S>                          <C>         <C>         <C>
Zero or less                 (1.0)%      (2.0)%      (3.0)%
 0.01% to  9.99%               -           -           -
10.00% to 14.99%              2.5%        5.0%       10.0%
15.00% to 19.99%              5.0%       10.0%       15.0%
20.00% or more               10.0%       15.0%       20.0%

For the executive officers of the Company, the above calculations will be
based on consolidated results for 50% of the quarterly bonus total, if any,
with the other 50% based upon the results of the separate divisions of the
Company.


</TABLE>
INCORPORATE UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
                                STATE OF NEVADA
                                   RESTRICTED


Number  _______                                                    Shares_______

        NO SALE,  OFFER TO SELL OR TRANSFER OF THE SHARES  REPRESENTED
        BY THIS  CERTIFICATE  SHALL  BE  MADE  UNLESS  A  REGISTRATION
        STATEMENT UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED
        WITH  RESPECT TO SUCH SHARES IS THEN IN EFFECT OR AN EXEMPTION
        FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF SUCH ACT IS THEN IN FACT
        APPLICABLE TO SUCH SHARES.



                          DIGITAL SERVANT CORPORATION

        50,000,000 AUTHORIZED SHARES   $.001 PAR VALUE   NON-ASSESSABLE

THIS CERTIFIES THAT ________________________________

IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF   ______________________________________________________


Shares of                   DIGITAL SERVANT CORPORATION             Common Stock
transferable  on the books of the  Corporation in  person or by duly  authorized
attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.  This Certificate
is not valid until  countersigned  by the Transfer  Agent and  registered by the
Registrar.

         WITNESS  the  facsimilie  seal of the  Corporation  and  the  facsimile
signature of its duly authorized officers.


Dated:  ________________



                           Digital Servant Corporation
______________________                Corporate            _____________________
SECRETARY                                Seal              PRESIDENT
No. 00-7081.

#### Pride *v.*Ward, Superintendent, Avon Park Correctional Institution, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27599]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

National Institute of Corrections

Advisory Board Meeting

Time and Date: 8:00 a.m., Tuesday, November 18, 1997 (changed from 
October 21, 1997).

Place: Sheraton National Hotel, 900 South Orme Street, Arlington, VA 
22204.

Status: Open.

Matters to be considered: Updates on NIC's strategic planning; survey 
concerning civil commitment of sex offenders; interstate compact; 
victims' issues discussion points; amendment of the Bylaws; election of 
officers/liaisons; orientation for new Board members; and the Office of 
Justice Programs quarterly report.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Larry Solomon, Deputy Director. 
(202) 307-3106, ext. 155.
Morris L. Thigpen,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-27599 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-36-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quepasa Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Matte, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | /s/ Michael D. Matte   
| | Michael D. Matte       
| | Chief Financial Officer



Date: May 14, 2009