No. 06-14-00099-CV

————————— IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT TEXARKANA

————————————————————————————————— RICHARD PARKER

Appellant

v. JOANN PARKER NEAL

Appellee

—————————————————————————————————

On Appeal from the 276th District Court of Camp County

Robert Rolston, Judge Presiding

—————————————————————————————————

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S BRIEF

—————————————————————————————————
Appellee JoAnn Parker Neal moves for an unopposed extension of time to file her Appellee’s brief in this proceeding and states the following in support:
I. Appellee’s brief is due to be filed on April 24, 2015. Appellee respectfully requests a thirty-day extension of time, until May 24, 2015, to file her brief. Appellee is not filing this motion for the purpose of delay, but in the interest of justice.

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S BRIEF Page 1 ACCEPTED 06-14-00099-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/13/2015 10:55:34 AM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERKI I .

Ap p el l an t R ic ha

r d P ar ke r r e que ste d and w a s gr ante d two u n op p o s ed ex t en s i on s

o f t i m e t o fi l e h i s Ap p el l an t ’ s b ri ef.
II I . Ap p el l ee h as b een rep res en t ed i n t h i s ap p eal b y h er t ri al co u n sel , Lan ce Hi n so n
. Ap p el lee h as n ow d et erm i n ed t h at it w o u l d b e i n h er bes t i nt eres t t o b e
rep res en t ed o n ap p eal by an at t o rn ey wh o fo cu ses h i s p ract i ce on ap p el l at e l aw. As

s u ch , Ap p el l ee hi red Ch ad Ru b ack t o b e h er lead ap p el l at e co u n s el

. Ru b ack i s fi l i n g h i s n o t i ce o f ap p earan c e o f co u n sel an d d es i g n at i o n o f l ead co u n s el

co n tem p o ran eo u s ly

wi t h t h i s m o t i o n
. Ru b ack i s b u s y

p rep ari n g t h e fo l lo wi n g o t h er ap p el l at e b ri efs : (1 ) an ap p el l an t ’ s bri ef i n LBS P, In c. Fo r es t Da le, In c. , 0 5 -1 4-0 1 2 9 5 -CV in t h e Dal l as Co u rt o f Ap p eal s , du e o n Ap ri l 1 5 , 2 0 1 5 ; an d (2 ) an ap p el l an t ’ s rep l y b ri ef i n Meyer v. Meyer , 05

- 1 4

- 0 06 5 5 -CV i n t h e Dal l as Co u rt o f Ap p eal s , du e o n M ay 1 5, 2 0 15

. Co n seq u en t l y , Ru b ack wi l l b e u n ab l e t o co m p l et e A p p el l ee’ s b ri ef in t h i s cas e b y t h e Ap ri l 2 4 , 2 0 15 d ead l i n e.

UNOPPOSE D MOT ION FOR E X T ENSION OF T IME T O FIL E APPE L LE E ’S B RIE F Pa g e 2I V.

W HEREFORE, PREM ISES CONSIDERED, A p p el lee J o An n Park er Neal
p ray s t h at t hi s Co urt en t er an ord er g ran t i n g her Un o p p o s ed M ot i o n fo r Ex t en s i o n o f
Ti m e t o Fi l e A p p el l ee’ s Bri e f an d sp eci fy i n g t h at Ap p el l ee’ s b ri ef b e fi l ed o n o r b efo re M ay

2 4 , 2 0 15

. Res pect fu l ly

s u bm i tt ed , / s / Ch ad M . Ru b ack Ch ad M . Ru b ack St at e Bar No . 9 0 0 01 2 4 4 Th e Ru b ackLaw Fi rm 8 1 1 7 Pres t o n Ro ad Su i t e 3 0 0 Dal l as , Tex as 7 5 2 2 5 (2 1 4 ) 5 2 2 -4 24 3 (2 1 4 ) 5 2 2 -2 19 1 facs i m i le ch ad @ap p eal .p ro C ERTI FI CATE OF CONFERENCE
On Ap ri l 1 3, 2 01 5 , I co n ferred wi t h To m S. McCo rk l e, co u n s el fo r Ap p el l an t Ri ch ard Park er, an d h e i s u no p p o s ed t o t h e rel i ef s o u g h t i n t h is m ot i o n
. / s / Ch adM . Ru b ack Ch ad M

. Ru b ack

UNOPPOSE D MOT ION FOR E X T ENSION OF T IME T O FIL E APPE L LE E ’S B RIE F Pa g e 3CERTI FI CATE OF SERVI CE

On Ap ri l 1 3 , 2 0 1 5 , I s erv ed a co p y o f t hi s d ocu m en t t o t h e fo ll o wi n g co u n s el fo r Ap p el l an t Ri ch ard Park er: To m S. M cCo rk l e 4 0 3 W . Ty l er St reet Gi l m er, Tex as 7 5 6 4 4 / s / Ch adM . Ru b ack Ch ad M

. Ru b ack

UNOPPOSE D MOT ION FOR E X T ENSION OF T IME T O FIL E APPE L LE E ’S B RIE F Pa g e 4