alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 1996 - Present WI Instruction Manual for Motor Vehicle 

Accident Report Form 1998

A – Incapacitating Injury A A: Any injury other than a fatal injury which prevents the injured person from walking, 

driving, or from performing other activities which he/she performed before the accident. 38 - Severity code & definition found of Manual 

pg51 (PDF pg53) .

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE STATE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 1998 - Present

Law Enforcement Officer's Instruction 

Manual for Completing the WI Motor 

Vehicle Accident Report Form (MV4000) 

1998

definition found on Manual pg96 

(PDF pg98).

Pedestrian 7

Any person who is not in or upon a motor vehicle or pedalcycle. Pedestrians include persons 

operating manually or mechanically propelled wheelchairs, or other low-powered vehicles 

designed specifically for use by a physically disabled person. 

21. Unit Type

code found on Manual pg37 (PDF 

pg39) ,

definition found on Manual pg95 

(PDF pg97). 

Pedalcyclist 1998 - Present

Bicycle 6 Bicyclist: Any pedalcycle that is not motorized such as a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, pedalcar, 

etc. 21. Unit Type

code found on Manual pg37 (PDF 

pg39) ,

definition found on Manual pg94 

(PDF pg96).

Wisconsin
Exhibit 13.1

Cookson Group plc and Subsidiaries

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C Section 1350)



In connection with the
annual report on Form 20-F of Cookson Group plc for the period ended 31 December 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nicholas R Salmon, Chief Executive of Cookson Group plc certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Cookson Group plc.



Date: 3 June 2005



/s/ Nicholas R SalmonNicholas R SalmonChief Executive(Chief Executive Officer)




---

Cookson Group plc and Subsidiaries

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C Section 1350)



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Cookson Group plc for the period ended
31 December 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dennis H Millard, Group Finance Director of Cookson Group plc certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The annual report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Cookson Group plc.



Date: 3 June 2005



/s/ Dennis H MillardDennis H MillardGroup Finance Director(Chief Financial Officer)
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





I,
      Albert
      W. Weggeman, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Stamford Industrial Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
      contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of Stamford
      Industrial Group, Inc.





Date:November
              10, 2008
            By:/s/
                Albert W. Weggeman,
                Jr.
              Name:Albert
                W. Weggeman, Jr.
              Title:President
                and Chief Executive Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




32
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. John D. JOHNSON, Respondent.

No. 39178.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 18, 1970.

Richard C. McFarlain, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

John D. Johnson, in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

■ The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar has filed in this Court its recommendation concerning the application for reinstatement of John D. Johnson as follows :

> “The Petitioner was disbarred from the practice of law on April 25, 1962. The State of Florida ex rel. The Florida Bar v. John D. Johnson, 140 So.2d 306 (Fla.1962). See also State of Florida ex rel. The Florida Bar v. John D. Johnson, 127 So.2d 886 (Fla.1961).

> “The Referee found Petitioner rehabilitated and that Petitioner had made full restitution to his clients with the exception of money owed to Lottie Ferguson. He further found that Petitioner had made a diligent effort to locate Lottie Ferguson for the purpose of reimbursing her.

> “It is the recommendation of the Referee, on the record before him, that Mr. Johnson be reinstated to membership in The Florida Bar. He also recommended that Petitioner place in escrow the sum of $250.00 for the benefit of Lottie Ferguson for a period of ten (10) years or that another appropriate method insuring reinbursement be provided.

> “The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar has reviewed the Petition and the Report of the Referee. The Board concurs in the Referee’s recommendation that Mr. Johnson should be reinstated to membership in The Florida Bar. When reinstated, the Board expects Mr. Johnson, as an honorable member of this profession, to uphold the high ethical standards of The Florida Bar by continuing his search for Lottie Ferguson in order to pay her the $250.00 due.

> “Therefore, .it is determined by the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar that it shall support the reinstatement of John D. Johnson.”

Upon consideration thereof, it is

Ordered that John D. Johnson be and he is, subject to the condition stated in the foregoing recommendation, reinstated in The Florida Bar.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26961]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


TransColorado Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

October 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 1, 1997, TransColorado Gas Transmission 
Company (TransColorado) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets, to 
become effective October 1, 1997:

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 30

    TransColorado states that the above tariff sheet is being filed to 
implement negotiated rate contracts pursuant to the Commission's 
Statement of Policy on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of-Service 
Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines and Regulation of Negotiated 
Transportation Services of Natural Gas Pipelines issued January 31, 
1996 at Docket Nos. RM95-6-000 and RM96-7-000.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26961 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Marcia GOLDNER, Appellant, v. TKP ASSOCIATES and Lydia Harrison, Appellees.

No. 77-676.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 6, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 1977.

*1172Michael L. Mann, Miami, for appellant.

Ehrich & Zuckerman, Miami, for appel-lees.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See the rule in *Hope*v. *National Airlines,*99 So.2d 244 (Fla.3d DCA 1957).
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

 Washington, D.C. 20590

March 11, 2011

In Reply Refer To:

HSST/WZ-301

Mr. Henry A. Ross

Director of Government Relations

Plasticade Products

7700 N. Austin Avenue

Skokie, Illinois 60077

Dear Mr. Ross:

This is in response to your October 8, 2010, letter requesting the Federal Highway 

Administration’s (FHWA) acceptance of your company’s NavicadeTM Traffic Channelizing 

Cone with a lightweight warning light attached as a crashworthy traffic control device for use in 

work zones and elsewhere on the National Highway System (NHS). Accompanying your letter 

was the FHWA Office of Safety Design form indicating successful performance when tested 

under the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Test 3-71 (Modified.)

You requested that we find the NavicadeTM Traffic Channelizing Cone acceptable for use with 

lightweight warning lights on the NHS under the provisions of the AASHTO Manual for 

Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). Evaluation with the 1100C passenger car at low speed 

(Test 3-70), and the 2270P pickup-truck at high speed (3-72) are requirements under the MASH. 

Your request was accompanied by a January 17, 2010, letter from E-Tech Testing Services 

requesting a waiver of both MASH Tests 3-70 and 3-72 because of the nature of the test articles 

and geometry of the vehicles. We concur in the waiver of these tests.

This letter is the acknowledgement of the FHWA’s acceptance of your request. The original 

completed form has been modified by the addition of the FHWA acceptance letter number and 

the date of our review. The form, of which a copy is enclosed for reference, will be posted on 

our Web site in the near future.

Sincerely yours,

Michael S. Griffith

Director, Office of Safety Technologies

Office of Safety 

Enclosures
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 303 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 303

  To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the use of Federal 
  funds for travel by the President if the President's annual budget 
        submission to Congress is late, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2023

 Mr. Marshall introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the use of Federal 
  funds for travel by the President if the President's annual budget 
        submission to Congress is late, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Presidential Budget Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR PRESIDENTIAL TRAVEL 
              EXPENSES IF PRESIDENT'S BUDGET IS LATE.

    Section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(j)(1) If the budget under subsection (a) is not submitted to 
Congress on or before the first Monday in February of a year, no 
Federal funds may be obligated or expended for the cost of travel by 
the President during the period beginning on the first Tuesday of 
February of such year and ending on the date the budget is submitted.
    ``(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term `Federal funds' 
includes amounts made available for--
            ``(A) the expense allowance of the President under section 
        102 of title 3;
            ``(B) travel expenses of the President under section 103 of 
        title 3;
            ``(C) entertainment expenses of the President under section 
        105(d)(3) of title 3; and
            ``(D) subsistence expenses in connection with the travel of 
        the President in section 105(d)(4) of title 3.''.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-7161

RODNEY H. ROBINSON,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

William S. Bach , of Washington, DC, for claimant-appellant.

Seth W. Greene , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division,

United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, fo r respondent-appellee. With

him on the brief were Gregory G. Katsas , Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E.

Davidson , Director, and Brian M. Simkin , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief

were Ethan Kalett , Supervisory Attorney, and Dana Raffaelli , Staff Attorney, Office of

the General Counsel, United Stat es Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.

Appealed from: United States Cour t of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Judge Bruce E. KasoldNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-7161

RODNEY H. ROBINSON,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secret ary of Veterans Affairs

Respondent-Appellee



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States C ourt of Appeals for Veterans Claims

in CASE NO(S). 06-3373

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge , MAYER, and DYK, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED February 3, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

AVCO CORPORATION, : Case No. 4:12-CV-01313

:

Plaintiff & :

Counterdefendant, :

:

v. : (Judge Brann)

:

TURN AND BANK HOLDINGS, :

INC. and PRECISION AIRMOTIVE :

LLC, :

:

Defendants & :

Counterclaim Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

AVSTAR FUEL SYSTEMS, INC. :

:

Counterclaim Defendant. :

ORDER

February 3, 2015

AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2015, upon consideration of the 

Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 101) filed by the Defendant Turn 

and Bank Holdings, Inc., and for the reasons discussed in the accompanying 

memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion be DENIED. Moreover, 

Defendant’s Renewed Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 111) is 

DENIED as moot.

Case 4:12-cv-01313-MWB Document 146 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 2
BY THE COURT:

/s Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

Case 4:12-cv-01313-MWB Document 146 Filed 02/03/15 Page 2 of 2
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

99–011 2011

112th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 112–5 

STATEMENT OF APPORTIONMENT POPULATION 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

HIS REPORT ON THE APPORTIONMENT POPULATION FOR EACH 

STATE AS OF APRIL 1, 2010, AND THE NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVES TO WHICH EACH STATE WOULD BE ENTITLED, PURSUANT TO 2 U.S.C. 2a(a) AND 13 U.S.C. 141(b) 

JANUARY 6, 2011.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committees on the Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform, 

and ordered to be printed 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with HEARING
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

Pursuant to title 2, United States Code, section 2a(a), I transmit 

herewith the statement showing the apportionment population for 

each State as of April 1, 2010, and the number of Representatives 

to which each State would be entitled. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, January 5, 2011. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with HEARING
2 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 3 HD1125.001
Exhibit 31.1

NUTRITIONAL SOURCING CORPORATION
CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William T. Keon III, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Nutritional Sourcing
    Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
    of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
    report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material
    respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
    the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
    to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
    board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
     are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability
     to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
     and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
     internal control over financial reporting.


Date: January 28, 2004

/s/ William T. Keon III_
William T, Keon III
Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7630

EUGENE RAFFALDT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT WARD, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH

CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-97-1091-2-23)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Raffaldt, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Raffaldt v. Ward, No. CA-97-1091-2-23 (D.S.C. Oct. 24,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of TOWER BUILDING CORP., Debtor.

No. 5927.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Oct. 22, 1936.

Herbert F. Hawkins, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.

Walter A. Wade, of Chicago, 111., for appellee.

Before EVANS, Circuit Judge, and LINDLEY and BRIGGLE, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Now this day come the parties by their counsel and this cause now comes on to be heard- on the printed record and briefs of counsel and on oral arguments.

On consideration whereof it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the order or decree of .the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, in this cause appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with costs. •
#### Mitchell E. GILLMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-505.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 17, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and Edwin T. Mulock, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed without prejudice. See Daniels v. O’Connor, Fla.1971, 243 So.2d 144. Opinion filed January 6, 1971, but not yet reported.

LILES, A. C. J., and MANN and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.