alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3044 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 434
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3044

                          [Report No. 118-189]

   To redesignate the Mount Evans Wilderness as the ``Mount Blue Sky 
                 Wilderness'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2023

Mr. Hickenlooper (for himself and Mr. Bennet) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                             July 10, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Manchin, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To redesignate the Mount Evans Wilderness as the ``Mount Blue Sky 
                 Wilderness'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mount Blue Sky Wilderness Act''.

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF THE MOUNT EVANS WILDERNESS AS THE ``MOUNT BLUE 
              SKY WILDERNESS''.

    (a) Redesignation.--Section 102(a)(10) of Public Law 96-560 (16 
U.S.C. 1132 note; 94 Stat. 3267) is amended by striking ``as the Mount 
Evans Wilderness;'' and inserting ``as the `Mount Blue Sky 
Wilderness';''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Mount Evans 
Wilderness shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mount Blue Sky 
Wilderness''.
                                                       Calendar No. 434

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3044

                          [Report No. 118-189]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To redesignate the Mount Evans Wilderness as the ``Mount Blue Sky 
                 Wilderness'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 10, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 32.1(a)

           Certification Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the
            Chief Executive Officer attached hereto as Exhibit 31.1.


<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 32(A)



                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of United Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Evelyn
F. Smalls, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Evelyn F. Smalls
----------------------------
Evelyn F. Smalls
Chief Executive Officer
April 14, 2005
#### Paul Nicholas GAGNON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1112.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 20, 1971.

Paul Nicholas Gagnon, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

*90Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BGF Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James R. Henderson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/    James R. Henderson                   
|James R. Henderson President August 11, 2003
#### Sandsbury LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-259.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 23, 1970.

*479Steadman S. Stahl, Jr., of Varón & Stahl, Hollywood, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

OWEN, Judge.

The history of this case is set forth in our prior opinion, Lee v. State, Fla.App.1969, 217 So.2d 861. In the cited case we reversed an order denying a motion to vacate under Rule 1.850 CrPR, 33 F.S.A., and remanded with directions to afford appellant an evidentiary hearing. Such a hearing was held, as a result of which the trial court found that the allegations of the motion to vacate were not proved, resulting in an order again denying such motion. The present appeal is from that order.

While the appeal was pending, appellant completed serving the term of his sentence and was released from custody. Such fact having been brought to our attention, we . sua sponte dismiss the appeal as moot. DeHoff v. Imeson, 1943, 153 Fla. 553, 15 So.2d 258.

Appeal dismissed.

McCAIN, J., and ADAMS, ALTO, (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54637-54638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27747]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Meeting

AGENCY: General Accounting Office.

ACTION: Notice of October meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board will meet on Friday, 
October 24, 1997, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. in Room 7C13 of the 
General Accounting Office building, 441 G St., N.W., Washington, D.C.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the following issues: (1) 
Natural Resources; (2) Pension Costs; (3) a request for guidance on the 
Property, Plant, and Equipment (PP&E) Standard; (4) Government-Wide 
Supplementary Stewardship Reporting Exposure Draft comments; (5) PP&E 
Technical Corrections and Amendments; and (6) Social Insurance. Any 
interested person may attend the meeting as an observer. Board 
discussions and reviews are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wendy Comes, Executive Director, 441 G St., N.W., Room 3B18, 
Washington, D.C. 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No. 92-463, 
Section 10(a)(2), 86

[[Page 54638]]

Stat. 770, 774 (1972) (current version at 5 U.S.C. app. section 
10(a)(2) (1988); 41 CFR 101-6.1015 (1990).

    Dated: October 15, 1997.
Wendy M. Comes,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-27747 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
```
#### Steven VAN AERNAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-77.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 24, 1973.

*44Maurice Wagner and Richard D. Ber-tone, of Wagner & Bertone, Holly Hill, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

WHITWORTH, LEWIS B., Associate Judge.

Appellant herein was tried in the Felony Court of Record of Volusia County on two separate informations, the first of which charged him with the unlawful sale of marijuana and the second with the unlawful possession of marijuana and conspiracy. From the judgments of conviction and sentence in each case based upon jury verdicts finding appellant guilty as charged, this appeal is taken.

At the request of appellant’s counsel, this court granted additional time for supplementing the record by such additional affidavits, pleadings, and other evidence as may relate to the alleged failure of the trial judge to disqualify himself in response to a motion filed by appellant. Because of the failure of appellant to file a supplemental record as permitted by the court, the point on appeal relating to the disqualification of the trial judge is rejected.

Appellant’s second and last point on appeal challenges the correctness of the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress the evidence proffered against him on the ground that the informant on whose information the search warrant issued was not sufficiently known to the af-fiant to support the allegation of probable cause. Our review of the record convinces us that the evidence adduced before the court at its hearing on the motion to suppress was sufficiently substantial and competent to support the ruling complained about.

Our review of the record reveals without dispute that there was a single transaction out of which both charges against appellant arose. His sale of the marijuana for which he was charged in one information and his possession of the same drug for which he was charged in the second information are but different aspects of the same transaction. Under the circumstances, only one sentence on the higher offense may be imposed. On the authority of Yost v. State (Fla.App.1971) 243 So.2d 469, the sentence imposed upon appellant for the sale of marijuana as charged in Case No. 2135 in the trial court is affirmed, and the sentence imposed on the conviction for possession of marijuana in Case No. 1952 in the trial court is reversed, set aside, and held for naught.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and RAWLS, J., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael K. Hoover, Chief Executive Officer of ProxyMed, Inc., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of ProxyMed, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: December 15, 2004 /s/ MICHAEL K. HOOVER
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-58311, 333-34645, 333-77793, 333-88671,
333-95883, 333-36982, 333-51856, 333-60500 and 333-81128) and Forms S-8 (File
Nos. 333-04717, 333-50391 and 333-92905) of ProxyMed, Inc. and its subsidiaries
of our report dated February 12, 2002 (except as to the Note 19, which is as of
March 26, 2002) relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 29, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 53589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27254]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

44 CFR Part 61

RIN 3067-AC73


National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); Standard Flood Insurance 
Policy

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Correction to proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the proposed rule that 
was published Tuesday, October 7, 1997, (62 FR 52304). The proposed 
rule related to the increase of the deductible under the Standards 
Flood Insurance Policy from $750 to $1,000 for structures eligible for 
subsidized coverage.

DATES: All comments received on or before November 7, 1997 will be 
considered before final action is taken on the proposed rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles M. Plaxico, Jr., Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, 
(202)646-3422, (facsimile) (202)646-4327.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The proposed rule would increase the deductible from $750 to $1,000 
under the Standard Flood Insurance Policy for structures eligible for 
subsidized coverage. Section 1308(b) of the National Flood Insurance 
Act of 1968 as amended (42 U.S.C. 4015) limits subsidized premium rates 
to structures built on or before December 31, 1974, or the effective 
date of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, whichever is later.

Need for Correction

    As published, the proposed rule contains errors with respect to the 
statutory date and is in need of correction.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of proposed rule on October 7, 1997, 
which is the subject of FR Doc. 97-26527, is corrected as follows:
    Paragraph C. of Article 7 of Appendix A (1) of 44 CFR Part 61 
[Corrected]
    On page 52305, Paragraph C. of Article 7 of Appendix A (1) to Part 
61, in the tenth line ``December 31, 1994'' is corrected to read 
``December 31, 1974''.
    On page 52305, Paragraph C. of Article 7 of Appendix A (2) to Part 
61, in the tenth line ``December 31, 1994'' is corrected to read 
``December 31, 1974''.
    On page 52305, Paragraph C. of Article 7 of Appendix A (3) to Part 
61, in the seventh and eighth lines ``December 31, 1994'' is corrected 
to read ``December 31, 1974.''
* * * * *
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.100, ``Flood 
Insurance''; No. 83.516, ``Disaster Assistance'')

    Dated: October 8, 1997.
Edward T. Pasterick,
Acting Executive Administrator, Federal Insurance Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-27254 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-03-P
#### Edmund WEISLO and Marie E. Weislo, his wife, Petitioners, v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF MARTIN COUNTY, a United States corporation, et al., Respondents.

No. 40430.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 18, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 240 So.2d 69.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.3(a)

RFS HOTEL INVESTORS, INC
SCHEDULE OF TERMS OF SALE AND
   PURCHASE AGREEMENTS
FOR AGREEMENTS IN 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 PURCHASE           SALE
                                                   PRICE            PRICE
                                                 --------           -----
<S>                                            <C>               <C>
SHERATON AND SHERATON FOUR POINTS HOTELS -
Milpitas, CA                                   $31,554,000
Sunnyvale, CA                                   25,800,000
Bakersfield, CA                                  9,914,000
Pleasanton, CA                                  23,509,000
Birmingham, AL                                  18,316,000
BEVERLY HERITAGE HOTEL
Milpitas, CA                                    33,763,000
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS -
Tupelo, MS                                                       $2,658,000
HOMEWOOD SUITES -
Plano, TX                                                         7,989,000
Salt Lake City, UT                                                7,754,000
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Division of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: February 20, 1997.
    Time: 11:00 a.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD.
    Contact Person: Dr. Jerrold Fried, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4126, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1777.
    Name of SEP: Biological and Physiological Sciences.
    Date: March 6 1997.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 6168, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Syed Amir, Scientific Review Administrator, 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6168, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 
435-1043.
    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: March 18, 1997.
    Time: 12:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4126, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Jerrold Fried, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4126, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1777.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 29, 1997.
Paula N. Hayes,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-2729 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Melinda Coghill, Chief Financial Officer of Rouge Resources Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 14, 2016





/s/  Melinda Coghill

Melinda Coghill

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Key Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Phyllis C. Best, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Phyllis C. Best


Phyllis C. Best


Chief Financial Officer


December 17, 2004