alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3078 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of 

higher education that authorize Anti-Semitic events on campus from 

participating in the student loan and grant programs under title IV 

of such Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 18, 2023 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself, Mrs. BRITT, Mrs. BLACKBURN, 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, and Mr. LANKFORD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit 

institutions of higher education that authorize Anti-Semitic events on campus from participating in the student 

loan and grant programs under title IV of such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Anti-Semitism 

5 on College Campuses Act’’. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3078 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF ANTISEMITIC EVENTS ON CAM2 PUS. 

3 Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

4 (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(30)(A) The institution will not authorize, fa7 cilitate, provide funding for, or otherwise support 

8 any event promoting Anti-Semitism on campus. 

9 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘Anti-Semi10 tism’ has the meaning given the working definition 

11 of Anti-Semitism adopted by the International Holo12 caust Remembrance Alliance on May 26, 2016, in13 cluding the contemporary examples of Anti-Semitism 

14 cited by the Alliance.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------








            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------



We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statements  on  Form S-8 (File No. 333-121439 and 333-36608) of our report dated
March  31,  2011,  relating  to  the consolidated financial statements of N-Viro
International  Corporation included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and
for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2010  and  2009.


/s/  UHY LLP
------------
UHY LLP
Southfield, Michigan
March 31, 2011
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                     HMH PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIO AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                    1997   1996    1995   1994     1993
                                                   ------  -----  ------  -----   ------
<S>                                                <C>     <C>     <C>    <C>     <C>
                                                         
Income from operations before income taxes.......  $  78   $  54   $  43  $  50   $  23  
 Add (deduct):                                           
 Fixed charges...................................    137     110      81     69      67  
  Capitalized interest...........................     --      (1)     (2)    (1)     (5)
  Amortization of capitalized interest...........      1       2       1      2       3  
  Net gains (losses) related to certain 50% or less      
  owned affiliate..                                    1      (1)     --     (1)     --
                                                   -----   -----   -----  -----   -----
  Adjusted earnings..............................  $ 217   $ 164   $ 123  $ 119   $  88
                                                   -----   -----   -----  -----   -----
Fixed charges:                                           
  Interest on indebtedness and amortization of           
    deferred financing costs.                      $ 128   $ 101   $  77  $  65   $  65 
  Portion of rents representative of the                 
    interest factor..............................      9       9       4      4       2
                                                   -----   -----   -----  -----   -----
           Total fixed charges...................  $ 137   $ 110   $  81  $  69   $  67
                                                   =====   =====   =====  =====   =====
  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.............   1.58    1.49    1.52   1.72    1.31
                                                   =====   =====   =====  =====   =====
 
</TABLE>
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2930 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government to regulate 

the labeling of products made in the United States and introduced 

in interstate or foreign commerce, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. LEE (for himself and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government 

to regulate the labeling of products made in the United 

States and introduced in interstate or foreign commerce, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reinforcing American5 Made Products Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2930 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSIVITY OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY TO REGU2 LATE LABELING OF PRODUCTS MADE IN THE 

3 UNITED STATES AND INTRODUCED IN INTER4 STATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE. 

5 Section 320933 of the Violent Crime Control and 

6 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 45a) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘To the ex9 tent’’ and inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—To the extent’’; 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) EFFECT ON STATE LAW.— 

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para14 graph (2), the provisions of this section shall super15 sede any provisions of the law of any State expressly 

16 relating to the extent to which a product is intro17 duced, delivered for introduction, sold, advertised, or 

18 offered for sale in interstate or foreign commerce 

19 with a ‘Made in the U.S.A.’ or ‘Made in America’ 

20 label, or the equivalent thereof, in order to represent 

21 that such product was in whole or substantial part 

22 of domestic origin. 

23 ‘‘(2) ENFORCEMENT.—Nothing in this section 

24 shall preclude the application of the law of any State 

25 to the use of a label not in compliance with sub26 section (a).’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 2930 IS

1 (3) in the third sentence of subsection (a), as 

2 so designated by paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Noth3 ing in this section’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as pro4 vided in subsection (b), nothing in this section’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       6,020,358
<SECURITIES>                                 6,008,698
<RECEIVABLES>                                  650,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    195,964
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,205,928
<PP&E>                                       1,069,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,695,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          779,750
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,542
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,944,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,695,055
<SALES>                                      3,054,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,054,151
<CGS>                                        1,327,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,359,444
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,853,735)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,853,735)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,853,735)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.39)
        







</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ERNEST FRANKLIN, )

)

Petitioner, )

v. ) Civil Action No. 05-308 Erie

)

SUPERINTENDENT, SCI FOREST, )

et al., )

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on

October 19, 2005 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

On October 25, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation

[Doc. No. 2] recommending that the Petitioner’s motion [Doc. No. 1] for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis be denied. The petitioner subsequently paid the $5.00 filing

fee on November 3, 2005 without filing any objection to the October 25, 2005 Report

and Recommendation.

Subsequently, on November 8, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and

Recommendation [Doc. No. 5] recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus

be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

for further proceedings. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of

service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail at SCI

Forest, where he is incarcerated, and on Respondent. Petitioner has filed no objections

to Magistrate Judge Baxter’s November 8, 2005 Report and Recommendation. After

de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the abovereferenced Reports and Recommendations, the following order is entered:

Case 1:05-cv-00308-SJM-SPB Document 6 Filed 11/29/05 Page 1 of 2
2

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 1] is DENIED and the petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is TRANSFERRED forthwith to the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Pennsylvania for further proceedings.

The Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on

October 25, 2005 [Doc. No. 2] and November 8, 2005 [Doc. No. 5] are hereby adopted

as the opinions of this Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00308-SJM-SPB Document 6 Filed 11/29/05 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 53754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27318]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army

33 CFR Part 334


Danger Zone, Pacific Ocean, Naval Air Weapons Station, Point 
Mugu, Ventura County, CA

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 28, 1997, the Corps published an interim final rule in 
the Federal Register, which established a danger zone in the waters of 
the Pacific Ocean extending 5,000 meters offshore from the small arms 
range at the Naval Air Weapons Station, in Point Mugu, Ventura County, 
California. The danger zone would provide an appropriate and 
enforceable zone in which the Navy may conduct small arms test firing 
to qualify military and civilian security personnel. The comment period 
for the interim final rule ended on August 27, 1997. No comments were 
received.

DATES: Effective July 28, 1997.

ADDRESSES: HQUSACE, CECW-OR, Washington, DC 20314-1000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Tiffany Welch at (805) 641-2935 or 
Mr. Ralph Eppard at (202) 761-1783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to its authorities in section 7 of 
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1917 (40 Stat. 266; 33 U.S.C. 1) and 
Chapter XIX of the Army Appropriations Act of 1919 (40 Stat. 892; 33 
U.S.C. 3), the Corps is amending the regulations in 33 CFR part 334 by 
adding a new danger zone regulation in Sec. 334.1125. On July 28, 1997, 
the Corps published the new danger zone regulations in the Federal 
Register (62 FR 40278) as an interim final rule, effective on the date 
of publication, with public comments invited until August 27, 1997. 
Based on comments received, the Corps would take appropriate action 
which could include further revision or suspension of the rules. We 
received no comments.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334

    Danger zones, Navigation (water), Transportation.

PART 334--DANGER ZONE AND RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS

    Accordingly, the interim final rule adding 33 CFR 334.1125 on July 
28, 1997, (62 FR 40278) is adopted as a final rule, without change.

    Dated: October 7, 1997.

    Approved:
Russell L. Fuhrman,
Major General, USA, Director of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 97-27318 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
March 9, 2015 

Mr. Gregg Fortunato 

Memphis I Shelby County Health Department - Air Pollution Control 

814 Jefferson Ave. 

Memphis, TN 38105 

RE: Idling of Cargill equipment and monitoring 

Dear Mr. Fortunato: 

i~fAR 1 ') ' .. 

Per our phone conversations, on Between January 28'h and March 61h 2015, the following emission points/groups were idled and are no longer in production. 

Emission Unit/Group Description 

1001B EL Barqe Pellet Belt Dust Collector 

EL #1 Gluten Flash Dryer Receiver Dust 

1015 Collector 

EL #2 Gluten Flash Dryer Receiver Dust 

1019 Collector 

EL Gluten Meal Loadout Receiver Dust 

1020 Collector 

EL Gluten Meal Loadout Aspiration Dust 

1021 Collector 

1024 EL Gluten Bin Dust Collector 

5002 MH #1 Starch Flash Dryer Scrubber 

MH #1 Starch Dryer to Bins Transfer 

5005 Dust Collector 

5007 MH #1 Starch Bin Vent 

5007 MH #2 Starch Bin Vent 

5007 MH #3 Starch Bin Vent 

5007 MH #4 Starch Bin Vent 

5007 MH #5 Starch Bin Vent 
5007 ==±- MH #12 Starch Bin Vent 5007 MH #13 Starch Bin Vent --

5008 MH #14 Starch Bin Vent 

5040 MH #3 Starch Flash Dryer Scrubber 

' 

MH #3 Starch Dryer to Bins Transfer 

I 5055 Dust Collectors 

SL #1/#2 Side Starch Loadout Receiver 

7001 Dust Collector 

SL #1/#2 Side Starch Loadout Aspiration 

7003 Dust Collector "--· 

! SL #3 Side Starch Loadout Aspiration 

7010 Dust Collector 

6003 RF Precoat Bin Dust Collector 

r----------- 6008 RF Carbon Furnace Scrubber -

8001 

-

CB Stoker Boiler Bag house 

r--------- - 8203 CB Ash Silo Vent Filter 

8301 CB Pulverized Coal Boiler Baghouse 

8302 CB Ash Silo Transfer Dust Collector 

9003 ' FX Lime Tank Aspiration Dust Collector I 

9005 FX Precoat Bin Dust Collector 

9006 FX Check Filter Precoat Dust Collector 

10001 GP Fiber Aspiration Dust Collector -- ---

10002 GP #2 Pellet Cooler Cyclone ·-· . - ~- 10003 GP #3 Pellet Cooler Cyclone -

10004 

____ GP t_t:J, Pellet Cooler Cyclone _ ----j ---

10005 

··---

GP #5 Pellet Cooler Cyclone ~ 10006 GP Secondary Pellet CoolerCyclone ___ 

10014 

_ GP PeiiE:Jt Belt Dust Collector 

_

1 

---

-

~-··-------.L_~-·---· 

-

. 

Cargill requests that as of March 6th, 2015, the online and manual monitoring tasks for these 

emission points and groups will no longer be required to be performed
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Louise MARTIN. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Martino SCATENA.

Nos. 8025, 8068.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 18, 1937.

Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for Commissioner.

Philip G. Sheehy, of San Jose, Cal., for respondent Martin.

Tadini Bacigalupi, of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent Scatena.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

These causes coming before this court on the transcripts of record and stipulations of counsel that these causes abide the decision of this court in cause No. 8067, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Elvira Scatena, decided September 21, 1936, 85 F.(2d) 729, and such decision having become final, it is ordered that a judgment of affirmance be filed and entered in each of above causes, and that the mandates of this court issue forthwith.
Exhibit 10.25

[Logo]

December
17, 2001

Elizabeth
Fetter
CEO and President
QRS Corporation
1400 Marina Way South
Richmond, CA 94804

Dear
Liz:

By
this letter, we propose amending the Employment Agreement, dated September 21, 2001, between you and QRS Corporation (the "Agreement") as follows:

The
third paragraph in the section of the Agreement under the heading "Long Term Incentives" shall be deleted and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

"100,000
of these options will vest based on specific performance. Specifically, options to purchase another 25,000 shares of common stock of QRS will become fully vested when the Company
establishes and maintains a stock price of more than $20 for 15 days. In addition, options to purchase an additional 75,000 shares of common stock (i.e., for a total of 100,0000
performance-based options) of QRS will become fully vested when the Company establishes and maintains a stock price of more than $30 for 15 days. In any event, these performance-based options will
vest on the sixth anniversary of your employment with QRS."

The
Agreement, as amended by this letter, shall remain in full force and effect, and this letter shall be deemed to be incorporated into the Agreement and made a part thereof.

[Logo]

If
the amendment to the Agreement set forth in this letter is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement by executing this letter where indicated below and returning a copy to me.

|                                    |  | Regards,                                      
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|                                    |  | /s/GARTH SALONER                              
|                                    |  | Garth Saloner, Chair of Compensation Committee
|Agreed:                             |  |                                               
|/s/ELIZABETH FETTERElizabeth Fetter |  |                                               

---

QuickLinks
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0242. MATTHEW JOSHUA HALL v. THE STATE.

Matthew Joshua Hall, proceeding pro se, pled guilty to child molestation and

aggravated child molestation, and the trial court entered the judgment of conviction

and sentence on April 9, 2018. Hall filed this appeal of the judgment on May 17,

2018. We lack jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the trial court

judgment or order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely

filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this

Court. Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Here, Hall

filed his appeal 38 days after the trial court entered the judgment. Therefore, this

appeal is untimely and is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

October 09, 2018

10/09/2018
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3041 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3041

      To reinstate certain sanctions imposed with respect to Iran.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2023

  Mr. Cotton (for himself, Mr. McConnell, Mrs. Blackburn, Mrs. Britt, 
Mrs. Capito, Ms. Collins, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Daines, Ms. Ernst, 
 Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Graham, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Hawley, Mr. 
Hoeven, Mr. Kennedy, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Ricketts, Mr. Scott of 
  South Carolina, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Tillis, Mr. 
 Tuberville, Mr. Vance, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Budd, Mr. Braun, 
and Mr. Young) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To reinstate certain sanctions imposed with respect to Iran.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF CERTAIN SANCTIONS IMPOSED WITH RESPECT TO 
              IRAN.

    Any statutory sanctions imposed with respect to Iran pursuant to 
section 1244(c)(1) or 1247(a) of the Iran Freedom and Counter-
Proliferation Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8803(c)(1) and 8806(a)), or 
section 1245(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8513a(d)(1)), that were waived, suspended, 
reduced, or otherwise relieved pursuant to an agreement between the 
United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran, including any waiver 
that is the subject of the document entitled ``Waiver of Sanctions with 
Respect to the Transfer of Funds from the Republic of Korea to Qatar'' 
and transmitted to Congress on September 11, 2023, are hereby 
reinstated and any action by the United States Government to facilitate 
the release of funds or assets to Iran pursuant to such agreement, or 
provide any further waiver, suspension, reduction, or other relief 
pursuant to such agreement, is hereby prohibited.
                                 <all>
```
#### Walter S. KLEMENTS, Appellant, v. The PACKER CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-474.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 18, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.