alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SUNSHORES, INC. a Tennessee Corporation, and H & S, Inc., an Alabama Corporation, Appellants, v. COUNTY OF PINELLAS et al., Appellees.

No. 77-2.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 9, 1977.

*759Jack F. White, Jr., Clearwater, for appellants.

Gerald A. Figurski, Asst. County Atty., Clearwater, for appellees.

OTT, Judge.

The lower court dismissed an alternate writ of mandamus with prejudice. We reverse.

Plaintiffs/appellants’ complaint alleged that they had acquired and begun to develop property in reliance upon zoning which was later changed to their detriment. The prayer was for the writ of mandamus. Initially the lower court issued the alternate writ of mandamus requiring the county/appellee to show cause why appellants’ building permit should not be issued. Subsequently, the circuit court dismissed the writ with prejudice, holding in relevant part:

> Florida Appellate Rule 4.1 provides that all appellate review of any rulings of any commission or board shall be by certiorari as provided by the Florida Appellate Rules. Based on the allegations of appellants it is clear that a review of the actions of the appellees . . . had to be by certiorari rather than mandamus.

Although mandamus was an improper method, this should not deprive appellants of the opportunity to state a cause of action in equity. Accordingly, the dismissal below should have been without prejudice.

Although Fla.App. Rule 4.1 provides for appellate review by certiorari appellants are not thereby precluded from proceeding with a separate action in equity for equitable estoppel, declaratory relief or injunction. *Hollywood Beach Hotel Company v. City of Hollywood,*329 So.2d 10 (Fla.1976); *Town of Largo v. Imperial Homes Corp.,*309 So.2d 571 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); *Sakolsky v. City of Coral Gables,*151 So.2d 436 (Fla.3d DCA 1963).

While the trial court was correct in dissolving the alternative writ of mandamus we reverse the dismissal of appellants’ complaint with prejudice and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
#### HOME SUPPLY COMPANY OF BARTOW, Appellant, v. LAKE WALES BANK & TRUST, Appellee.

No. 70-680.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23

                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference  of our  report  included  in this  Form  10-K/A,  into the  Company's
previously  filed  Registration   Statements  File  No's.  33-76526;   33-80454;
33-88302;  333-2818;  333-37393;  333-39453;  333-51455;  333-62517;  333-62983;
333-64139; 333-68161; 333-49004; and 333-61412.

/s/ Arthur Andersen

Phoenix, Arizona
April 25, 2002
#### Roger PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Leroy COOPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. M-320, M-327.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 1970.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Phillips was convicted of attempted robbery and assault with intent to commit murder in the second degree. Appellant Cooper was convicted of attempted robbery and aggravated assault.

The crimes of which a jury found appellants guilty occurred as they attempted to rob Younan’s Grocery at 13th and Myrtle Avenue in Jacksonville, Florida, on July 25, 1968. Before the robbery could be accomplished, one of the perpetrators fired a shot wounding an employee at the store and appellants broke and ran. Both appellants were identified by victims present at the scene.

We have considered the record on appeal and the briefs filed herein, and from such consideration we conclude that the questions raised by appellants are insubstantial. The jury’s guilty verdict is amply supported by the evidence. No reversible error having been demonstrated, the judgments in both cases are therefore

Affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Nautilus, Inc., a Washington corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                                     
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|November 10, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Edward J. Bramson               
|Date              |  |  |  |     |  | Edward J. Bramson,                  
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)       

To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the
Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|November 10, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William D. Meadowcroft                           
|Date              |  |  |  |     |  | William D. Meadowcroft                               
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                           40,110
<SECURITIES>                                     19,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    64,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                136,427
<PP&E>                                            3,159
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  207,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            78,098
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         34,420
<OTHER-SE>                                        7,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    207,217
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                933,817
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   903,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 38,028
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (11,315)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (2,819)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (8,496)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (8,496)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.27)


</TABLE>
# C_2005088EN.01000601.xml

| 12.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3704 — CVC/Mivisa)

(2005/C 88/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3704. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3704. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
124 STAT. 3280 PUBLIC LAW 111–306—DEC. 14, 2010 

Public Law 111–306 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To require the accreditation of English language training programs, and for other 

purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ACCREDITATION OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TRAINING PROGRAMS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (15)(F)(i), by striking ‘‘a language’’ and 

inserting ‘‘an accredited language’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(52) The term ‘accredited language training program’ means 

a language training program that is accredited by an accrediting 

agency recognized by the Secretary of Education.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 

amendments made by subsection (a) shall— 

(A) take effect on the date that is 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act; and 

(B) apply with respect to applications for a nonimmigrant visa under section 101(a)(15)(F)(i) of the 

Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

1101(a)(15)(F)(i)) that are filed on or after the effective 

date described in subparagraph (A). 

(2) TEMPORARY EXCEPTION.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 

101(a)(15)(F)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 

as amended by subsection (a), during the 3-year period 

beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, an 

alien seeking to enter the United States to pursue a course 

of study at a language training program that has been 

certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security and has 

not been accredited or denied accreditation by an entity 

described in section 101(a)(52) of such Act may be granted 

a nonimmigrant visa under such section 101(a)(15)(F)(i). 

(B) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT.—An alien may not be 

granted a nonimmigrant visa under subparagraph (A) if 

the sponsoring institution of the language training program 

to which the alien seeks to enroll does not— 

(i) submit an application for the accreditation of 

such program to a regional or national accrediting 

agency recognized by the Secretary of Education within 

Deadline. 

Time period. 

Applicability. 

8 USC 1101 note. 

Definition. 

Dec. 14, 2010 

[S. 1338] 


etreine on DSKHP91DQ1 with PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC LAW 111–306—DEC. 14, 2010 124 STAT. 3281 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1338: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 1, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act; 

and 

(ii) comply with the applicable accrediting requirements of such agency. 

Approved December 14, 2010. 


etreine on DSKHP91DQ1 with PUBLIC LAWS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53636-53637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Deletion of Agenda Items From October 9th Open Meeting

    The following items have been deleted from the list of agenda items 
scheduled for consideration at the October 9, 1997, Open Meeting and 
previously listed in the Commission's Notice of October 2, 1997.

Item No., Bureau, Subject

1--Wireless Telecommunications--Title: Service Rules for the 746-806 
MHz Band, and Revisions to Part 27 of the Commission's Rules and The 
Development of Operational, Technical and Spectrum Requirements for 
Meeting Federal, State and Local Public Safety Agency Communication 
Requirements Through the Year 2010 -- Establishment of Rules and 
Requirements for Priority Access Service (WT Docket No. 96-86). 
Summary: The Commission will consider action concerning service rules 
for the 746-806 MHz band and

[[Page 53637]]

on rules to permit the provision of priority access service.

2--Common Carrier--Title: Administration of the North American 
Numbering Plan (CC Docket No. 92-237) and Toll Free Service Access 
Codes (CC Docket No. 95-155). Summary: The Commission will consider 
action concerning the administrator of the North American Numbering 
Plan, the Billing and Collection Agent for telecommunications numbering 
administration, and administration of the database containing toll free 
numbers.

    Dated October 9, 1997.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27413 Filed 10-10-97; 12:06 pm]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          57,935
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         446,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 499,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        133,064
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         10
<COMMON>                                           244
<OTHER-SE>                                     357,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   499,129
<SALES>                                         61,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,986
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,087
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,587
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37


</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Rouge Resources Ltd. on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 22, 2014

ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.

/s/ Linda Smith
---------------------------------------Linda Smith, President and
Chief Executive Officer.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27169]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Revocation of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Final Order of the United States 
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, dated September 4, 
1997, the United States Small Business Administration hereby revokes 
the license of Washington Finance and Investment Corporation a District 
of Columbia Corporation, to function as a Small Business Investment 
Company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 03/03-
5150 issued to Washington Finance and Investment Corporation on June 3, 
1982, and said license is hereby declared null and void as of October 
6, 1997.

Small Business Administration.

    Dated: October 6, 1997.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 97-27169 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee for Injury Prevention and Control: Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following committee meeting.

    Name: Advisory Committee for Injury Prevention and Control 
(ACIPC).
    Time and Date: 1-4:30 p.m., November 18, 1997.
    Place: Sheraton Washington Hotel, 2660 Woodley Road at 
Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20008.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available.
    Purpose: The Committee advises and makes recommendations to the 
Secretary, the Assistant Secretary for Health, and the Director, 
CDC, regarding feasible goals for the prevention and control of 
injury. The Committee makes recommendations regarding policies, 
strategies, objectives, and priorities, and reviews progress toward 
injury prevention and control. The Committee provides advice on the 
appropriate balance and mix of intramural and extramural research, 
including laboratory research, and provides guidance on intramural 
and extramural scientific program matters, both present and future, 
particularly from a long-range viewpoint. The Committee provides 
second-level scientific and programmatic review for applications for 
research grants, cooperative agreements, and training grants related 
to injury control and violence prevention, and recommends approval 
of projects that merit further consideration for funding support. 
The Committee recommends areas of research to be supported by 
contracts and provides concept review of program proposals and 
announcements.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The Science and Program Review Work 
Group (SPRWG) will meet to discuss a research grants update, 
upcoming program announcements, and related issues. Following the 
Work Group meeting, the full Committee will meet to discuss (1) Safe 
America Partnership Council; (2) National Partnership Council 
including Federal and corporate components; (3) a report from SPRWG; 
and (4) status of the Institute of Medicine study on injury 
prevention and control.

    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for more Information: Mr. Thomas E. Blakeney, 
Executive Secretary, ACIPC, National Center for Injury Prevention and 
Control, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, M/S K61, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-
3724, telephone 770/488-1481.

    Dated: October 15, 1997.
Nancy C. Hirsch,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-27786 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title: US Department of State dispatch - 1990/1991/1992/1993/1994/1995/1996/1997/1998/1999
SuDoc Number  [if !vml]>[endif]>S 1.3/5:
[if !vml]>[endif]>
 
 
Item    Number  0864
[if !vml]>[endif]>
CGP    System Number  000913111    
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  October 12,  2000  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|