FHWA: HSST /CC-126_MASH SKT.docx 

cc: HSST Will Longstreet

U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

July 7 2017 

In Reply Refer To: 

HSST-1/B-285 

Mr. Hani Nassif 

RIME Laboratory 

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 

96 Frelinghuysen Rd, 

Piscataway, NJ 08854 

Dear Mr. Hani Nassif: 

This letter is in response to your May 10, 2017 request for the Federal Highway Administration 

(FHWA) to review a roadside safety device, hardware, or system for eligibility for 

reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program. This FHWA letter of eligibility is 

assigned FHWA control number B-285 and is valid until a subsequent letter is issued by FHWA 

that expressly references this device. 

Decision 

The following devices are eligible, with details provided in the form which is attached as an 

integral part of this letter: 

• NJDOT Balustrade Pulaski Skyway Bridge Parapet 

Scope of this Letter 

To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding, new roadside safety devices should meet the crash 

test and evaluation criteria contained in the American Association of State Highway and 

Transportation Officials’ Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). However, the 

FHWA, the Department of Transportation, and the United States Government do not regulate the 

manufacture of roadside safety devices. Eligibility for reimbursement under the Federal-aid 

highway program does not establish approval, certification or endorsement of the device for any 

particular purpose or use. 

This letter is not a determination by the FHWA, the Department of Transportation, or the United 

States Government that a vehicle crash involving the device will result in any particular outcome, 

nor is it a guarantee of the in-service performance of this device. Proper manufacturing, 

installation, and maintenance are required in order for this device to function as tested. This 

finding of eligibility is limited to the crashworthiness of the system and does not cover other 

structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 
 

 

 

 

2 

Eligibility for Reimbursement 

Based solely on a review of crash test results and certifications submitted by the manufacturer, 

and the crash test laboratory, FHWA agrees that the device described herein meets the crash test 

and evaluation criteria of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation 

Officials’ Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). Therefore, the device is eligible for 

reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program if installed under the range of tested 

conditions. 

Name of system: NJDOT Balustrade Pulaski Skyway Bridge Parapet 

Type of system: Bridge Barrier 

Test Level: MASH Test Level 4 (TL4) 

Testing conducted by: Texas AM Transportation Institute 

Date of request: May 10, 2017 

Date initially acknowledged: June 22, 2017 

FHWA concurs with the recommendation of the accredited crash testing laboratory as stated 

within the attached form. 

Full Description of the Eligible Device 

The device and supporting documentation, including reports of the crash tests or other testing 

done, videos of any crash testing, and/or drawings of the device, are described in the attached 

form. 

Notice 

If a manufacturer makes any modification to any of their roadside safety hardware that has an 

existing eligibility letter from FHWA, the manufacturer must notify FHWA of such modification 

with a request for continued eligibility for reimbursement. The notice of all modifications to a 

device must be accompanied by: 

o Significant modifications – For these modifications, crash test results must be 

submitted with accompanying documentation and videos. 

o Non-signification modifications – For these modifications, a statement from the 

crash test laboratory on the potential effect of the modification on the ability of 

the device to meet the relevant crash test criteria. 

FHWA's determination of continued eligibility for the modified hardware will be based on 

whether the modified hardware will continue to meet the relevant crash test criteria. 

Any user or agency relying on this eligibility letter is expected to use the same designs, 

specifications, drawings, installation and maintenance instructions as those submitted for review. 
 

 

 

 

 

3 

You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the same chemistry, 

mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for review, and that it will meet the test 

and evaluation criteria of the MASH. 

Issuance of this letter does not convey property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege. This 

letter is based on the premise that information and reports submitted by you are accurate and 

correct. We reserve the right to modify or revoke this letter if: (1) there are any inaccuracies in 

the information submitted in support of your request for this letter, (2) the qualification testing 

was flawed, (3) in-service performance or other information reveals safety problems, (4) the 

system is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, or (5) any other 

information indicates that the letter was issued in error or otherwise does not reflect full and 

complete information about the crashworthiness of the system. 

Standard Provisions 

• To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of eligibility designated as FHWA 

control number B-285 shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test 

documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and 

documentation may be reviewed upon request. 

• This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, 

manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder. 

• If the subject device is a patented product it may be considered to be proprietary. If 

proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects: 

(a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented 

items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization 

with the existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists; or (c) 

they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short 

sections of road for experimental purposes. Our regulations concerning proprietary 

products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411. 

Sincerely yours, 

Robert Ritter 

Acting Director, Office of Safety 

Technologies 

Office of Safety 

Enclosures 
p 

Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 1 of 4 

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility 

of Highway Safety Hardware 

Date of Request: May 10, 2017 I r. New (' Resubmission

Name: Hani Nassif 

... 

... 

... 

QI 

·e

.c 

:, 

V, 

Company: RIME Laboratory - Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 

Address: 96 Frelinghuysen Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854 

Country: U.S.A.

Michael S. Griffith, Director 

FHWA, Office of Safety Technologies To: 

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid 

highway program. 

Device & Testina Criterion - Enter from riaht to left startina with Test Level Fl 

System Type 

'B': Rigid/Semi-Rigid Barriers 

(Roadside, Median, Bridge 

Railinqs) 

Submission Type 

(e Physical Crash Testing 

(' Engineering Analysis 

Device Name/ Variant 

NJ DOT Balustrade/a

Pulaski Skyway Bridge 

Parapet 

Testing Criterion 

AASHTO MASH 

Test

Level 

TL4 

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration, I certify 

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety 

Hardware and that the evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH. 

Individual or Or anization res onsible for the roduct: 

Contact Name: Lynn Middleton Same as Submitter D 

Company Name: New Jersey Department ofTransportation Same as Submitter D 

Address: Office of Legislative, Administrative & Regulatory Actions, 1035 Same as Submitter D n_ .. 1 ••.. -.• A •• _ •··--•-- ..-.11 nnr�rCountry: U.S.A. Same as Submitter D 

Enter below all disclosures of financial interests as required by the FHWA 'Federal-Aid Reimbursement 

Eligibility Process for Safety Hardware Devices' document. 

The RIME Team at Rutgers University was awarded a research funding contract in 2013 in response to a Request 

For Proposal (RFP) announced by the NJ DOT Research Bureau to conduct research, design and evaluate a New 

Jersey historic bridge balustrade. The design is non-proprietary and Rutgers RIME Team has no further financial 

interest in the marketing or use of this design. 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 2 of 4 

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 

(e' New Hardware or 

Significant Modification 

(' Modification to 

Existing Hardware 

This balustrade is an open-faced concrete barrier with top rail, curb, and post columns. The test installation is a

156 ft. and 1-1 /4 in. long steel reinforced concrete bridge parapet, and deck comprises of six 26-ft. long 

segments. Each 26-ft. long segment of this 44-in. tall system is comprised of two 13-ft. long sections. The top 

rail is 7-in. tall and 16-in. deep, and the bottom of the top rail measures 37-in. above the bridge deck. The rail is 

integral to, and sat atop, eleven 19-in. tall reinforced concrete posts per section. The nine interior posts are 

each 8-in. wide x 10-in. deep, and the end posts are each 12-in. wide x 10-in. deep, and all posts are integral to 

an 18-in. tall x 16-in. deep curb. The window spacing between posts is 6-in. The bridge parapet contains 1 /4-

in. wide expansion control joints along the length of the parapet between 26-ft long segment. Furthermore, 

the bridge parapet contains cold contraction joints (with no space) located between 13-ft. long section at the 

halfway point of each 26-ft. long segment. Longitudinal reinforcement does not extend across the cold 

contraction joints in the barrier. All exposed edges have a 3/4-in. chamfer. 

CRASH TESTING 

By signature below, the Engineer affiliated with the testing laboratory, agrees in support of this submission that 

all of the critical and relevant crash tests for this device listed above were conducted to meet the MASH test 

criteria. The Engineer has determined that no other crash tests are necessary to determine the device meets 

the MASH criteria. 

Engineer Name: William F. Williams 

Engineer Signature: 

Address: 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3135 Same as Submitter D 

Country: U.S.A. Same as Submitter D 

A brief description of each crash test and ,ts result: 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description 

Eva luation 

Results 

4-1 0 ( 11 00C) 

Test 607451-3; 2016-12-21; Report TTI 

607 451-1-3; 2,429 lb small passenger car 

(2010 Kia Rio) impacting at 62.5 mph and 

25.0 degrees; The vehicle did not penetrate, 

underride, or override the installation. 

Maximum dynamic deflection during the 

test was 0.5 in. No detached elements, 

fragments, or other debris were present to 

penetrate or show potential for penetrating 

the occupant compartment or to present 

hazard to others in the area. Maximum 

occupant compartment deformation was 

3.5 in. in the left toe pan area. The vehicle 

remained upright during and after the 

collision event. Maximum roll and pitch 

angles were 11 degrees and 4 degrees, 

respectively. Occupant risk factors were 

within the limits specified in MASH . 

PASS 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 3 of 4 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description 

Evaluation 

Results 

4-11 (2270P) 

Test 607451-2; 2016-12-20; Report TTI 

607451-1-3; 5,037 lb pick up truck (2011 

Dodge RAM 1500) impacting at 62.5 mph 

and 24.0 degrees; The vehicle did not 

penetrate, underride, or override the 

installation. Maximum dynamic deflection 

of the bridge parapet during the test was 

1.0 in. No detached elements, fragments, or 

other debris were present to penetrate or 

show potential for penetrating the 

occupant compartment or to present 

hazard to others in the area. Maximum 

occupant compartment deformation was 

2.0 in. in the left kick panel/toe pan area. 

The vehicle remained upright during and 

after the collision event. Maximum roll and 

pitch angles were 24 degrees and 6 

degrees, respectively. Occupant risk factors 

were within the preferred limits specified in 

MASH. 

PASS 

4-12 (100005) 

Test 607451 -1; 2016-12-16; Report TTI 

607451 -1-3; 22,030 lb single unit truck (2006 

International 4200) impacting at 57.4 mph 

and 15.3 degrees; The vehicle did not 

penetrate, underride, or override the 

installation. Maximum dynamic defl ection 

of the bridge parapet during the test was 

4.4 in. No detached elements, fragments, or 

other debris were present to penetrate or 

show potential for penetrating the 

occupant compartment or to present 

hazard to others in the area. Maximum 

occupant compartment deformation was 

8.0 in. in the left kick panel/toe pan area. 

PASS 

4-20 (11 OOC) Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

4-21 (2270P) Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

4-22 (100005) Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test 

laboratory (cite the laboratory's accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports .): 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 4 of 4 

Laboratory Name: Texas AM Transportation Institute 

Laboratory Signature: Darrell L. Kuhn Darrell L. Kuhn 2017.04.25 15:34:27 -05'00' 

Address: 

Roadside Safety & Physical Security, Texas A&M 

University System, 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 

77843-3135 

Same as Submitter D 

Country: U.S.A. Same as Submitter D 

Accreditation Certificate 

Number and Dates of current 

Accreditation period : 

ISO 17025 Laboratory, Testing Certificate# 2821.01 

Expires April 30, 2019 

2017.05.09 

ATTACHMENTS 

Attach to this form: 

1) Additional disclosures of related financial interest as indicated above. 

2) A copy of the full test report, video, and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in 

support of this request. 

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications 

[Hardware Guide Draw ing Standards]. For proprietary products, a single isometric line drawing is 

usually acceptable to illustrate the product, with detailed specifications, intended use, and contact 

information provided on the reverse. Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that 

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted 

to facilitate our review. 

FHWA Official Business Onl 

Eligibility Letter 

Number Date Key Words 
 

TR No. 607451-1-3 41 2017-03-30 

Table 8.4. Assessment Summary for MASH TL-4 Tests on Pulaski Skyway Bridge Parapet. 

Evaluation 

Factors 

Evaluation 

Criteria Test No. 607451-1 Test No. 607451-2 Test No. 607451-3 

Structural 

Adequacy A S* S S 

Occupant 

Risk 

D S S S 

F N/A S S 

G S N/A N/A 

H N/A S S 

I N/A S S 

Test No. MASH Test 4-12 MASH Test 4-11 MASH Test 4-10 

Pass/Fail Pass Pass Pass 

* S = Satisfactory 

U = Unsatisfactory 

N/A = Not Applicable 
 

 

 

 

 

 

TR No. 607451-1-3 18 2017-03-30 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

TR No. 607451-1-3 38 2017-03-30 

Table 8.1. Performance Evaluation Summary for MASH Test 4-12 on the Pulaski Skyway Bridge Parapet. 

Test Agency: Texas A&M Transportation Institute Test No.: 607451-1 Test Date: 2016-12-16 

MASH Test 4-12 Evaluation Criteria Test Results Assessment 

Structural Adequacy 

A. Test article should contain and redirect the vehicle or The Pulaski Skyway Bridge Parapet contained 

bring the vehicle to a controlled stop; the vehicle and redirected the 10000S vehicle. The vehicle 

should not penetrate, underride, or override the did not penetrate, underride, or override the Pass 

installation although controlled lateral deflection of installation. Maximum dynamic deflection 

the test article is acceptable. during the test was 4.4 inches. 

Occupant Risk 

D. Detached elements, fragments, or other debris from No detached elements, fragments, or other debris 

the test article should not penetrate or show potential were present to penetrate or show potential for 

for penetrating the occupant compartment, or present penetrating the occupant compartment, or to Pass 

an undue hazard to other traffic, pedestrians, or present hazard to others in the area. 

personnel in a work zone. 

Deformations of, or intrusions into, the occupant Maximum occupant compartment deformation 

compartment should not exceed limits set forth in was 8.0 inches in the left kick panel/toe pan area. Pass 

Section 5.3 and Appendix E of MASH. 

G. It is preferable, although not essential, that the vehicle 

remain upright during and after collision. 

The 10000S vehicle remained upright during and 

after the collision event. Pass 
 

 

 

TR No. 607451-1-3 26 2017-03-30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

TR No. 607451-1-3 39 2017-03-30 

Table 8.2. Performance Evaluation Summary for MASH Test 4-11 on the Pulaski Skyway Bridge Parapet. 

Test Agency: Texas A&M Transportation Institute Test No.: 607451-2 Test Date: 2016-12-20 

MASH Test 4-11 Evaluation Criteria Test Results Assessment 

Structural Adequacy 

A. Test article should contain and redirect the vehicle or The Pulaski Skyway Bridge Parapet contained 

bring the vehicle to a controlled stop; the vehicle and redirected the 2270P vehicle. The vehicle 

should not penetrate, underride, or override the did not penetrate, underride, or override the Pass 

installation although controlled lateral deflection of installation. Maximum dynamic deflection of 

the test article is acceptable. the parapet during the test was 1.0 inch. 

Occupant Risk 

D. Detached elements, fragments, or other debris from No detached elements, fragments, or other debris 

the test article should not penetrate or show potential were present to penetrate or show potential for 

for penetrating the occupant compartment, or present penetrating the occupant compartment, or to Pass 

an undue hazard to other traffic, pedestrians, or present hazard to others in the area. 

personnel in a work zone. 

Deformations of, or intrusions into, the occupant Maximum occupant compartment deformation 

compartment should not exceed limits set forth in was 2.0 inches in the left kick panel/toe pan area. Pass 

Section 5.3 and Appendix E of MASH. 

F. The vehicle should remain upright during and after The 2270P vehicle remained upright during and 

collision. The maximum roll and pitch angles are not after the collision event. Maximum roll and Pass to exceed 75 degrees. pitch angles were 24 degrees and 6 degrees, 

respectively. 

H. Longitudinal and lateral occupant impact velocities Longitudinal OIV was 18.0 ft/s, and lateral OIV 

should fall below the preferred value of 30 ft/s, or at was 28.9 ft/s. Pass 

least below the maximum allowable value of 40 ft/s. 

I. Longitudinal and lateral occupant ridedown Maximum longitudinal ridedown was 4.4 g, and 

accelerations should fall below the preferred value of maximum lateral ridedown was 8.9 g. Pass 15.0 g, or at least below the maximum allowable value 

of 20.49 g. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

250° 

~ 

~f 11 .0' 

4.2'~ 

172' ---

7.2° 

I • 1 

Exit Path \

__J 

Impact Path E Xlt Angle Box 

Detail A 

Scalel : 50 

TR No. 607451-1-3 34 2017-03-30 

0.000 s 0.150 s 0.300 s 0.450 s 

General Information 

Test Agency........................ 

Test Standard Test No. ....... 

TTI Test No. ....................... 

Test Date ............................ 

Test Article 

Type ................................... 

Name.................................. 

Installation Length............... 

Material or Key Elements .... 

Soil Type and Condition ...... 

Test Vehicle 

Type/Designation................ 

Make and Model ................. 

Curb.................................... 

Test Inertial......................... 

Dummy ............................... 

Gross Static ........................ 

Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) 

MASH Test 4-10 

607451-3 

2016-12-21 

Bridge Rail 

Pulaski Skyway Bridge Parapet 

156 ft-11⁄4 inches 

Twelve 13 ft long sections w/16-inch wide 

× 44 inch tall rail with 7-inch tall × 16-inch 

wide rail atop 19-inch tall concrete posts 

8 inches wide × 10 inches deep spaced on 

14-inch centers, atop 18-inch tall × 16-inch 

wide curb 

Concrete Bridge Deck, Dry 

1100C 

2010 Kia Rio 

2518 lb 

2429 lb 

165 lb 

2594 lb 

Impact Conditions 

Speed .................................62.5 mi/h 

Angle ..................................25.0 degrees 

Location/Orientation............ 4.2 ft upstream of 

open joint 

Impact Severity..................... 57 kip-ft 

Exit Conditions 

Speed .................................50.4 mi/h 

Angle ..................................7.2 degrees 

Occupant Risk Values 

Longitudinal OIV ................. 23.0 ft/s 

Lateral OIV.......................... 31.5 ft/s 

Longitudinal Ridedown........ 4.2 g 

Lateral Ridedown ................ 11.0 g 

THIV ...................................42.5 km/h 

PHD....................................11.3 g 

ASI...................................... 2.79 

Max. 0.050-s Average 

Longitudinal ..................... −13.3 g

Lateral.............................. 20.2 g 

Vertical............................. −4.0 g

Post-Impact Trajectory 

Stopping Distance...................... 

Vehicle Stability

Maximum Yaw Angle ................. 

Maximum Pitch Angle ................ 

Maximum Roll Angle .................. 

Vehicle Snagging....................... 

Vehicle Pocketing ...................... 

Test Article Deflections 

Dynamic..................................... 

Permanent ................................. 

Working Width............................ 

Vehicle Damage

VDS ........................................... 

CDC........................................... 

Max. Exterior Deformation.......... 

OCDI.......................................... 

Max. Occupant Compartment 

Deformation ............................ 

172 ft dwnstrm 

21 ft twd traffic 

44 degrees 

4 degrees 

11 degrees 

No 

No 

0.5 inch 

Negligible 

16.5 inches 

11LFQ4 

11FLEW4 

9.0 inches 

LF0003000 

3.5 inches 

Figure 7.7. Summary of Results for MASH Test 4-10 on the Pulaski Skyway Bridge Parapet. 
 

 

 

 

TR No. 607451-1-3 40 2017-03-30 

Table 8.3. Performance Evaluation Summary for MASH Test 4-10 on the Pulaski Skyway Bridge Parapet. 

Test Agency: Texas A&M Transportation Institute Test No.: 607451-3 Test Date: 2016-12-21 

MASH Test 4-10 Evaluation Criteria Test Results Assessment 

Structural Adequacy 

A. Test article should contain and redirect the vehicle or The Pulaski Skyway Bridge Parapet contained 

bring the vehicle to a controlled stop; the vehicle and redirected the 1100C vehicle. The vehicle 

should not penetrate, underride, or override the did not penetrate, underride, or override the Pass 

installation although controlled lateral deflection of installation. Maximum dynamic deflection 

the test article is acceptable. during the test was 0.5 inch. 

Occupant Risk 

D. Detached elements, fragments, or other debris from No detached elements, fragments, or other debris 

the test article should not penetrate or show potential were present to penetrate or show potential for 

for penetrating the occupant compartment, or present penetrating the occupant compartment, or to Pass 

an undue hazard to other traffic, pedestrians, or present hazard to others in the area. 

personnel in a work zone. 

Deformations of, or intrusions into, the occupant Maximum occupant compartment deformation 

compartment should not exceed limits set forth in was 3.5 inches in the left toe pan area. Pass 

Section 5.3 and Appendix E of MASH. 

F. The vehicle should remain upright during and after The 1100C vehicle remained upright during and 

collision. The maximum roll and pitch angles are not after the collision event. Maximum roll and Pass to exceed 75 degrees. pitch angles were 11 degrees and 4 degrees, 

respectively. 

H. Longitudinal and lateral occupant impact velocities Longitudinal OIV was 23.0 ft/s, and lateral OIV 

should fall below the preferred value of 30 ft/s, or at was 31.5 ft/s. Pass 

least below the maximum allowable value of 40 ft/s. 

I. Longitudinal and lateral occupant ridedown Maximum longitudinal ridedown was 4.2 g, and 

accelerations should fall below the preferred value of maximum lateral ridedown was 11.0 g. Pass 15.0 g, or at least below the maximum allowable value 

of 20.49 g. 
 

 

L 

I I I I --------- ___________________ J_ ___________________ _l_ ___________________ __L ___________________ _l_ ______________ _ 

. ( . 

. ( . 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

_________________________________________ I ...!..._ 

\ 

Test Installation

A

B

B Elevation View

 156'-1-1/4" 

Anchor Bars @ 18" 

Anchor Bars @ 12" 

Anchor Bars @ 18" 

Plan View

13'-0"

Typ x 12

1/4" open joint

Typ x 5

Detail A

Scale 1 : 50

Contraction Joint

(no space)

Typ x 6

 29" 

0" 

18" 

44" 

37" 

8" 

Section B-B

Scale 1 : 20

1a. Concrete is 4000 psi.

1b. All rebar is grade 60 and epoxy coated. 

Minimum lap length is 32" for #4 bars. 2016-09-16

GES Scale1:200 Sheet 1 of 5

Project Rutgers University Parapet

Test Installation

607451

Roadside Safety and

Physical Security Division -

Proving Ground 

Drawn By

T:\1-ProjectFiles\607451 - Rutgers University\Rutgers Drafting\607451 Drawing
I 

• 

l I 

'f 

I 

I  I 

 29" 

12" 

0" 

8" 

18" 

37" 

44" 

1"0"10"16" 

Existing Concrete Apron

3/4" Chamfer exposed 

concrete edges as shown

Elevation View - End

Scale 1:20

 13'-0" 

C C

Typical Parapet Section

Elevation View

 6" Typ 8" 

1" 

1/2" 

12" 

0" 

5" 

10" 

16" 

1" 

9" 

Section C-C

Scale 1 : 10

Posts are symmetric about CL 's.

Typ all Posts

Concrete Details

2016-09-16

GES Scale Sheet 2 of 5

T:\1-ProjectFiles\607451 - Rutgers University\Rutgers Drafting\607451 Drawing

1:50

Project Rutgers University Parapet

Concrete Details

607451

Roadside Safety and

Physical Security Division -

Proving Ground 

Drawn By
2" cover

A-bar @ 6"

C-bar @ 8"

L-bar, top @ 4"

L-bar, bottom @ 8"

End View

Rebar, Ø1/2" @ 9"

top mat

Roadside Safety and

Physical Security Division -

Proving Ground 

Typical in Parapet

E-bar (8) in Parapet as shown

B-bar

D-bar @ 8"

9" 

Rebar, Ø1/2" @ 9"

bottom mat

2-1/2" cover 

1-1/4" cover 

3" to CL Anchor Bar 2" Weld to existing rebar (not shown here)

See sheet 1 for spacing.

Project 607451 Rutgers University Parapet 2016-09-16

Drawn By GES Scale 1:15 Sheet 3 of 5 Rebar Details-End

T:\1-ProjectFiles\607451 - Rutgers University\Rutgers Drafting\607451 Drawing
I -

\ - - _., ~ 

I rt 

~~-il-~i--L--~~-il-L---~i-~~---L-il-~i--L--~~-il-L---~i F=R=~f==~==~F=R=~===~f=~F===~=R=~f==~==~F=R=~===~f ~~---L-il-~i--L--~~-il-L---~i-~~---L-il-~i--L--~~-il-~~ ~F===~=R=~f==~==~F=R=~===~f=~F===~=R=~f==~==~F=R=~ I I I I I I 

I I I I 

' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 

II II I I .I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I. I I II ,II rf=ft=7F="==1p"1J==="'7f=1f===="]l=7f"'===1f=ft==*=7fi1F="'==ft=if===*1F=:i'====if=1p*===:i'7f=="=~p=ft=~1 

:,~ :: :~ :: fil :: :: fil :: :: :: :: :: :: 1:: :: ij 1:: :: ij :: t: :: :: t =o=:::i ~= ===u= ==== :::i:i::==t~ ==== ==i:i::::: ====t~ =o== ~=:::i:i:: =t~== ==o= f,:i::=== ==t~= ==== f,:i::==t~ ==== :::i:i::== == ~=o= 11 111 II 111 II 111 II 111 111 II 111 II 11 11 11 II 1

11 II 111 111 II 111 II 111 II 111 Ill II Ill II 1

11 II Ill 111 II Ill II 11 11 11 II 111 II Ill 111 II Ill II 111 II 111 

::1 :: ::1 :: 1:: :: ::1 1:: :: ::1 :: :: II:: :: 1:: :: ::1 1:: :: ::1 :: 1:: :: 1:: 111 11 111 11 111 11 111 111 11 111 11 1111111 11 !!I 11 111 !!I 11 111 11 111 11 111 

- ~~-~

,-----L __ - J J I I I I I I I 

I --------

--

-~.:[ J:, 

_,/ 

---

 1-5/8" cover

0"4"8" 

10" 

4" 6" Typ 

10" 

D D 10" 6"

2"0"

2-5/8" cover 

7 spaces @ 8"

8" 4" 10" 56" 7" 

4" 

Symmetric about CL

Section D-D

Scale 1 : 10

T:\1-ProjectFiles\607451 - Rutgers University\Rutgers Drafting\607451 Drawing

Roadside Safety and

Physical Security Division -

Proving Ground 

Project 607451 Rutgers University Parapet 2016-09-16

Drawn By GES Scale 1:20 Sheet 4 of 5 Rebar Details-Elevation
 

L 

± 

0 

± 

± 

0 

(/) l 

-------- I l 

lF u¢ 

--ti--  _--------i.., I 7 

± 0 

+ 

0 

± 

0 

± 

0 

 6" 

42" 

3/4" 

B-bar

86 1/4" long

288

 6" 

12-1/4" 

19" 

10" 

3-3/4" 

5/8" 

D-bar

42 1/8" long

252

 21-5/8" 

3/4" 

12" 

12" 

4-1/2" Typ 

252

C-bar

41 7/8" long

 9" lap 

3" 

3/8" 

12" 

A-bar 312

35 5/16" long

 33-5/8" 

36-5/8" 

3-3/4" 

5/8" 

462

L-bar, top

68 11/16" long

 25" 

7" 

3-3/4" 

5/8" 

139

Anchor Bar

30 7/16" long

 29" 

29" 

3-3/4" 

5/8" 

234

L-bar, bottom

56 7/16" long

 12'-9" 5/8" 

E-bar 96

5a. Numerals in hexagons indicate quantity 

needed for each bar. 2016-09-16

GES Scale Sheet 5 of 5

T:\1-ProjectFiles\607451 - Rutgers University\Rutgers Drafting\607451 Drawing

1:10

Project Rutgers University Parapet

Rebar Bends

607451

Roadside Safety and

Physical Security Division -

Proving Ground 

Drawn By
[ ] 

r- [ ] r- [ ] 

7 7 > 

I I nnnnnnnnnn I nnnnnnnnnn ______ _l___ n _ _________ J_ ' ------

____________ _ l_ ---------- ~ '---

I mm1m1m1m pmnmmnmn'I 1mnmmnmm i'"'""'Hl""Hl'I nnmmnunnn i''H"'"'""""" ! mnnnnmmm I' i1 " • oo II Ill II rn l : : : : : 1111~0~111•~00~1111 •111~00~0~00~0 J I 

Test Installation 0" 21'-1/2"

47'-8-1/2"100'-5-1/2"156'-1-1/4" 

60" 5.0ft

51-5/8" 4.3ft 43-7/16" 3.6ft

 15.0° 

25.0° 

25.0° Plan View

Impact Path

Box Van

Impact Path

Pickup Impact Path

Car

Elevation View

Roadside Safety and

Physical Security Division -

Proving Ground 

Project 607451 Rutgers University Parapet 2016-12-15

Drawn By GES Scale1:200 Sheet 1 of 1 Test Installation

T:\1-ProjectFiles\607451 - Rutgers University - Williams\Rutgers Drafting\607451 Impact Drawing