UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Regulatory Docket No. _______________ 

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF: 

MARK R. DICONZO

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE 

CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL 

OPERATION OF THE DJI PHANTOM 2 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 

112-95) 

Submitted on August 26th, 2015 

Dear Exemption Manager,

 I wish to submit this Petition for Exemption for Unmanned Aircraft System operations. My request 

is to receive a waiver of the sections identified below. I am looking to operate a UAS in use of 

commercial applications for the roofing industry, insurance claims, landscape farming inventory, and 

aerial photography/videography. Approving this request will serve the public, its economic interest and 

will contribute to the safety of people. I have great knowledge of FAA ruling and have great awareness 

of restricted and operational airspace. My number one goal is always safety when it comes to flight 

operations. I do not push the technical boundaries of my DJI UAS and always fly by the law and 

regulations that are established. By allowing me this exemption for real world experience, I will be able 

to develop the best use of the UAS in the public. Operational utilization, training of the UAS, etc. has 

yet to be fully developed in the general public area, thus by allowing me to play a role in the 

development I will require more operational flight experience, and therefore need to get your approval 

for this petition in order to better positively educate the public on UAS applications. 

 

MARK R. DICONZO

BEAUTIFUL DEMON PHOTOGRAPHY

21-62 CRESCENT STREET

APARTMENT, C1

ASTORIA, NY 11105

(207)-807-7522

mark@beautifuldemonphotography.com

BEAUTIFULDEMONPHOTOGRAPHY.COM
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

 Page 

GLOSSARY OF 

ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................................................3 

SUMMARY............................................................................................................................. 4 

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER......................................................4 

BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................5 

BASIS FOR PETITION...........................................................................................................5 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER................................................................6 

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH 

MARK DICONZO SEEKS EXEMPTION..................................................................7 

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF MARK DICONZO SEEKS AND 

THE REASON MARK DICONZO SEEKS THE RELIEF................................9

 

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING MARK DICONZO’S REQUEST

WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST .............................................................11

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD NOT 

ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY...............................................................................13 

CONCLUSION.......................................................................................................................19 

APPENDIX – A - DJI PHANTOM 2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ............................20 

APPENDIX – B - DJI PHANTOM 2 USER MANUAL(S) .................................................21

APPENDIX – C – MONTHLY MAINTENANCE LOG .....................................................21

 

 
GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level 

AOI Area of Interest 

ATC Air Traffic Control 

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

COA Certificate of Authorization 

FAA Federal Aviation Administration 

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation 

GCS Ground Control Station 

GPS Global Positioning System 

LOL Loss of Link 

NAS National Airspace System 

NOTAM Notice to Airman 

PIC Pilot In Command 

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) 

SO Safety Observer 

SOP Standard Operating Procedures 

UA Unmanned Aircraft 

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System 

VFR Visual Flight Rules 

VLOS Visual Line of Site 

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions 

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing 

DJI UAV manufacturer

ESC Electronic speed control

FPV First Person View 

LI-PO Lithium Polymer battery

RCV Radio Controlled vehicle 
SUMMARY

MARK DICONZO, operating under the company title, Delta Aerial Imaging, LLC. seeks exemption 

from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System 

pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption 

will permit Mark DiConzo to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose 

of conducting aerial video and photography for Marketing, film sets, real estate photography, 

commercials, special events, wedding cinematography, marine photography, roofing inspection, and 

landscape imaging over certain areas of the United States. 

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

My name is MARK DICONZO, and I am an Aerial RCV enthusiast photographer with over 5

years of experience operating various types of Aerial RCV’s as well as 3 years operating quadcopter 

UAS’s. MARK DICONZO also provides customers high quality photography for a wide range of 

commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting:

• Aerial event photography

• Real Estate Marketing

• Aerial event filming

• Film production

• Aerial location scouting and safety inspection

• Increassing public knowledge of UAS and promote safe UAS operations.

The objective of Mark DiConzo and Beautiful Demon Photography is to provide superior aerial 

imaging for a wide range of industries and events while promoting safe UAS operations and promoting 

public knowledge of UAS’s as well as providing a high level of knowledge about UAS’s. Mark 

DiConzo is considered an advanced level RCV pilot who has even taught beginners how to pilot 

RCV’s.
BACKGROUND 

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 2 UAS

Mark DiConzo seeks an exemption to operate the DJI system for compensation or hire within the NAS. 

The DJI Phantom 2 is a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground 

Control Station (GCS) utilizing an electronic monitor system. The DJI Phantom 2 has a maximum 

gross weight of approximately 2 pounds 14 ounces, while having a length of 16 inches width of 16 

inches, height of 8 inches, and a maximum speed of approximately 29 knots. The DJI Phantom 2 UAS 

is equipped with four main rotors; driven by a Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motor. 

The DJI Phantom 2 UAS that will be operated by Mark DiConzo will be registered in accordance with 

49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft, as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration, and 

marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Markings. 

BASIS FOR PETITION 

Petitioner, MARK DICONZO, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 

C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special 

Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially 

operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption from 

the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated 

with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Mark DiConzo’s operation of DJI Phantom 2 UAS meets 

the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Accordingly, Mark DiConzo requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & 

(a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply to 

aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. 

Mark DiConzo submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will be 

ensured. Mark DiConzo will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, 

alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices 
prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Manual). 

Furthermore, Mark DiConzo will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 

2. 

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and 

limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by Mark DiConzo to the extent necessary to allow a Pilot in 

Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as an airman medical 

certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight- hour and currency requirements, 

that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS in a manner consistent with this 

exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from 

people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Mark DiConzo seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, because the DJI 

Phantom 2 UAS does not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, 

Subpart H. As such, Mark DiConzo submits that he will ensure that the DJI Phantom 2 UAS is in an 

airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UAS is in compliance with the 

operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Instruction Manual), and that 

the aircraft is in a condition for safe flight. 

Mark DiConzo also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter 

Settings, as the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will not have a typical barometric altimeter onboard. However, 

altitude information of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning 

System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the 

UAS to the (GCS) for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude information, combined with

Mark DiConzo’s operation of the DJI Phantom UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 400 feet 

AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. 

Additionally, Mark DiConzo seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), entitled 

Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. Mark DiConzo submits that safety will not be affected 

by operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions 

(VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 

approximately 15.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, 

to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. 

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Mark DiConzo provides the following information in support of 

its petition for exemption: 

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is:

MARK DICONZO

BEAUTIFUL DEMON PHOTOGRAPHY

21-62 CRESCENT STREET

APARTMENT C1

ASTORIA, NY 11105

(207)-807-7522

 Email: mark@beautifuldemonphotography.com
A. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which Mark DiConzo Seeks Exemption.

1. Mark DiConzo Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, subsections 

(a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part:

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) 

of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may 

that person, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft. 

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection 

with any business or employment if—(1)The flight is only incidental to that business or 

employment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for 

compensation or hire. 

2. MARK DICONZO Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a). 

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the following: (a) No 

person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

3. MARK DICONZO Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121. 

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in 

part: 

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of 

that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating--

Below 18,000 feet MSL, to--

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 

100 nautical miles of the aircraft; 

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this 

section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; 

or 

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the 
departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.

4. MARK DICONZO Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 

91.151(b). 

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection (b), states 

the following: 

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless 

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first 

point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at 

least 20 minutes. 

5. MARK DICONZO Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a).

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following: Each owner 

or operator of an aircraft— 

(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall 

between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have 

discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.] 

6. MARK DICONZO Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)(1)

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or 

alteration, subsection (a)(1), states the following: 

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive 

maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless-- (1) It has been approved for return to 

service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter[.] 

7. MARK DICONZO Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) 

And 91.409(a)(2). 

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following: 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft 

unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had -- 

(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been 

approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or 

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance 

with part 21 of this chapter. 

8. MARK DICONZO Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) 

And 91.417(b). 

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the following: 

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered 

owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph 

(b) of this section: 

1. Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and 
records of the 100-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved 

inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each 

engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must include--

(i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of 

the work performed; and 

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and 

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the 

aircraft for return to service.

2. Records containing the following information:

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, 

and each rotor. 

(ii) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, 

propeller, rotor, and appliance. 

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft 

which are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis. 

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since 

the last inspection required by the inspection program under which the 

aircraft and its appliances are maintained. 

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and 

safety directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or 

safety directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive 

involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is 

required. 

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each 

major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, 

propellers, and appliances. 

3. The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods 

prescribed: 

(i) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be 

retained until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 

year after the work is performed. 

(ii) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be 

retained and transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. 

(iii) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 

43.11 of this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and 

the aircraft is approved for return to service. 

B.The Extent Of Relief MARK DICONZO Seeks And The Reason MARK DICONZO Seeks The 

Relief. 

1. Extent Of Relief MARK DICONZO Seeks And The Reason MARK DICONZO Seeks 

Relief From Section 61.113(a) And (b). 

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: 

Pilot in command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or 

higher level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has 

met certain flight-hour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight 

operations for compensation or hire. 

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state 
that a private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with 

any business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; 

and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

As set forth more fully below, MARK DICONZO submits that an equivalent level of 

safety will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS 

unless that PIC has met certain flight-hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the 

PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS in a manner consistent with the operations 

specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as 

well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Furthermore, MARK DICONZO submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, 

conducted by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to MARK 

DICONZO's business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

2. Extent Of Relief MARK DICONZO Seeks And The Reason MARK DICONZO Seeks 

Relief From Section 91.7(a).

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the 

extent required to allow MARK DICONZO to determine that the DJI Phantom 2 UAS is in 

airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the 

operating documents (i.e., MARK DICONZO’s Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly 

Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Instruction Manual, Pre-Flight Checklist). 

MARK DICONZO seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 2 UAS does not 

require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, 

MARK DICONZO will ensure that the DJI Phantom 2 UAS is in airworthy condition based 

upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI 

Phantom 2 Instruction Manual) prior to every flight, and further, determine that the aircraft is in 

condition for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and limitations below.

3. Extent Of Relief MARK DICONZO Seeks And The Reason MARK DICONZO Seeks 

Relief From Section 91.121. 

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight 

operations of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, which utilizes a barometric pressure sensor, GPS 

equipment, and a radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information 

from the UA to the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any 

altitude information concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet 

above ground level (AGL), MARK DICONZO seeks the requested relief because the DJI 

Phantom 2 UAS’s altimeter may be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local 

barometric pressure or field altitude, before each flight. 

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 

is sought to the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated 

below. As more fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the 

DJI Phantom 2 UAS is equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which 

automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, 

and provides the PIC with altitude information of the UA on the heads-up display of the GCS. 

4. Extent Of Relief MARK DICONZO Seeks And The Reason MARK DICONZO Seeks 

Relief From Section 91.151(b). 

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is 

requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 UAS

during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules 
(VFR), for a total duration of 15.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming 

normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. MARK DICONZO seeks the 

requested relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration 

of the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 UAS will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial 

video or still photo flight operations that MARK DICONZO proposes to conduct pursuant to 

this Petition.

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, 

the DJI Phantom 2 UAS’s operating documents, and proposed operating limitations, ensure that 

MARK DICONZO will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 UAS during daylight 

hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough 

battery power to fly for a total duration of 15.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing 

and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. 

5. Extent Of Relief MARK DICONZO Seeks And The Reason MARK DICONZO Seeks 

Relief From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only 

apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, MARK DICONZO requests relief from these 

Sections because the DJI Phantom 2 UAS does not require airworthiness certificates. As set 

forth more fully below, the DJI Phantom 2 UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for 

operation without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, MARK DICONZO will use trained 

technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using 

the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., MARK 

DICONZO Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, DJI Phantom 2 Instruction 

Manual, Pre-Flight Checklist). Furthermore, MARK DICONZO will document and maintain all 

maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 2 UAS. 

C. The Reasons Why Granting MARK DICONZO’s Request Would Be In The Public Interest; 

That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing MARK 

DICONZO to safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of 

construction sites, real estate, and landscape, boats, and events over certain areas of the United 

States.

Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, 

reduce pollution, crashes and accidents caused by pilot error and provide significant benefits to 

the economy. Notably, the benefits of MARK DICONZO’s proposed operation of the DJI 

Phantom 2 UAS will be realized without implicating any privacy issues.

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The DJI Phantom 2 UAS is battery powered and serves as a safe, efficient, and 

economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial 

imagery. By reducing the amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial 

acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use of a DJI Phantom 2 UAS would reduce the 

amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as 

increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground. 

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, 

congestion around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The 

DJI Phantom 2 does not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of 

manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer 

aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, 

arrival, and landing phases of flight operations. 
2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 2

UAS. 

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, instead of manned 

aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise 

pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight 

operations. By using battery power and electric motors, the DJI Phantom 2 UAS 

produces no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally conscious alternative 

to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are typically 

utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately 20-30 gallons 

per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 2 UAS, while reducing the carbon 

footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAS is propelled 

by battery powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine. 

By using the DJI Phantom 2 UAS to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial 

risk to life and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with 

traditional manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely 

eliminated. Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the 

DJI Phantom 2 (weighing approximately 2 pounds 14 ounces at its maximum gross 

weight, with a length of 16 inches, and a width of 16 inches, and with no fuel on board), 

has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and 

in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations 

(weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a 

length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons).

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 2

UAS Will Benefit The Economy. 

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 2 UAS is also an 

economical alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As 

such, operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will allow United States based companies, 

like Beautiful Demon Photography, to remain competitive and contribute to growth of 

the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the 

Environmental Protection Agency (―EPA‖) regulatory actions phasing out leaded 

aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative 

technology in order to remain competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 

2 UAS is one such technology that not only allows companies greater operational 

flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high 

operational cost of a traditional manned aircraft.

By operating the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, companies such as Beautiful Demon 

Photography, can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job 

stability to employees and contractors, which will ultimately contribute to growth of the 

U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. companies, through commercial 

use of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, provides a stable workforce that increases consumer 

spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to 

invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United 

States and abroad. 

4. There Are No Privacy Issues.

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been 
conducted for decades, MARK DICONZO’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 2

UAS will not implicate any privacy issues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will be 

operated only in compliance with operating documents (i.e., MARK DICONZO Aerial 

Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, DJI Phantom 2 and Instruction Manual, 

Pre-Flight Checklist) which requires property owner involvement as well as local law 

enforcement notification, and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, 

including the minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The 

Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The Rule 

From Which MARK DICONZO Seeks Exemption. 

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 2 UAS Meets The Conditions Of The FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333.

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with 

the unmanned aircraft and its operation, MARK DICONZO’s operation of the DJI Phantom 2

UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness 

certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Section 333 provides authority for 

a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets forth requirements for considering 

whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat 

to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part: 

(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later 

than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall 

determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace 

system before completion of the plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the 

guidance required by section 334 of this Act.

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination under 

subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum—

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, 

speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within 

visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public 

or pose a threat to national security; and whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of 

authorization, or airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, 

is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1).

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.--If the Secretary determines under this section that 

certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the 

Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the 

national airspace system. 

In seeking this exemption, MARK DICONZO submits that the DJI Phantom 2 UAS can 

operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the 

characteristics of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the 

specific operating limitations. 

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 2 UAS Demonstrates Its Safe 

Characteristics. 

The DJI Phantom 2 UAS does not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or 

otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational 

capability. 
i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 2 UAS. 

The technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS is set forth by the DJI 

Phantom 2 Specifications and Data Sheet, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

ii. The DJI Phantom 2 UAS’Autonomous Flight And Navigation Modes Enable 

The UAS To Remain Within A Defined Operational Area. 

The DJI Phantom 2 UAS may be operated in both manual and fully autonomous 

flight modes. A complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI 

Phantom 2 UAS is provided at pages 25-35 of the DJI Phantom 2 User Manual, attached 

hereto as Exhibit B. 

iii. The DJI Phantom 2 UAS is Designed For Automatic Return To Home Point Or 

Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation. 

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will remain stationary, in 

flight, for 3 seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 2 UAS does not 

reacquire control link data from the GCS, the UAS will assume that the Control Link is 

lost and the UAS will return to the home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will 

descend to the takeoff position and shutdown. A complete description of the Failsafe 

Functions of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS are set forth at pages 27 through 29 of the DJI 

Phantom User Manual, attached hereto as Exhibit B.

iv. The DJI Phantom 2 GCS And Its Operation.

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Phantom 2

GCS and flight control software is provided at pages 32 through 43 of the DJI Phantom 

2 User Manual. DJI Phantom 2 User Manual is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 2 UAS is Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A 

Certificated Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer. 

MARK DICONZO will only utilize certificated pilots who possess a current and 

valid airman medical certificate to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the DJI Phantom 

2 UAS. Additionally, a safety observer will assist all pilots during flight time. 

c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 2 UAS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific 

Operating Limitations. 

In seeking this exemption, MARK DICONZO proposes to commercially operate

the DJI Phantom 2 UAS for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and 

photography over certain areas of United States, pursuant to the following specific 

operating limitations: 

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following 

aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UASs weighing less than 55 

pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 2 Unmanned Aircraft System. Proposed 

operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this 

grant. 

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the 

purpose of aerial video and photography. 

3. The UAS may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots.

4. The UAS must be operated at an altitude of no more than 500 feet above ground level 

(AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a 

special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in 
feet AGL. 

5. The UAS must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate. 

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not 

permitted. 

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the 

VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO and 

PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting 

is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight 

and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must 

ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating documents. 

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and 

avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not 

permitted to operate the camera or other instruments. 

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS 

operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists 

between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the 

procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations contained 

in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator 

must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may 

update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such 

revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon request. 

The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for 

extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any 

update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted the exemption, 

then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s 

UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates 

or revisions to the operating documents. 

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition 

for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the 

UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been 

performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control 

Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations 

must be properly documented in the aircraft records. 

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS 

operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must 

undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must 

make an entry in the aircraft records. 

12. The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable 

components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the 

operating documents.

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, maintenance, 
overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements. 

14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping 

requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, 

alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the 

aircraft records, including total time in service, description of work accomplished, and 

the signature of the authorized person returning the UAS to service. 

15. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety 

Bulletins. 

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective 

action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections.

17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current thirdclass medical certificate. 

18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s 

qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner 

consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, including evasive 

and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, 

vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be logged in a manner 

consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s 

PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, training operations may 

only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and 

experience-building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered 

nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from 

nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

 

19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. 

All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If 

flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to 

proposed area of operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not 

authorized. 

20. The UAS may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as 

denoted on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with 

that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with 

a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport 

management must be made available to the Administrator upon request. 

21. The UAS may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

22. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a predetermined location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in 

accordance with the operating documents.

23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in 

accordance with the operating documents. 
24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the 

intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining. 

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of 

Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of 

exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman 

(NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the 

operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements in 

the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential transponder 

requirements. 

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (NNumber) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be 

as large as practicable. 

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and 

control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or 

other appropriate government oversight agency requirements. 

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to 

the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These 

documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official 

upon request. 

29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation 

operations and activities at all times. 

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels, 

vehicles, and structures unless: 

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating 

persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must 

ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation 

arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 

feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or; 

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the 

owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those 

objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and; 

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do not 

present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a). 

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from 
land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be 

conducted. 

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to 

the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained 

on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov. 

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b) Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety. 

MARK DICONZO submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 

61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI 

Phantom 2 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and 

currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS in a 

manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Considering MARK DICONZO’s proposed area of operations, and the operating 

limitations set forth-above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge 

requirements to those of commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the 

airmanship skills necessary to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, MARK DICONZO

submits that the additional manned airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot 

would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for MARK DICONZO’s specific

proposed flight operations. 

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, 

in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 

11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 

11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). MARK DICONZO will not allow any PIC to 

operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flighthour requirements and the DJI Phantom 2 UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC 

is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, 

including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from 

people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and 

logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS 

rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those hours as a UAS pilot operating the same 

make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption). In addition to the hour 

requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for 

currency purposes). 

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight 

experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an 

equivalent level of safety during MARK DICONZO’s proposed operations. The Administrator 

has held that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with 

applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as follows: 

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the 

purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and 

logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft 

pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi-rotor UAS. Prior to 

operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have accumulated and logged a 

minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for 

operations under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour 
requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be 

included in the 10 hours of multi-rotor time and the 10 hours may be included in the total 25 

hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 

takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a 

minimum, the flighthour requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and 

build proficiency in the skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. 

The FAA also finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance 

with applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and 

experience-building flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish 

the required flight time. During training, proficiency, and experience-building flights the PIC is 

required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119. 

Exemption No. 11138 at page 15. 

Accordingly, MARK DICONZO will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to 

operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flighthour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS 

in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

 

CONCLUSION

MARK DICONZO seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 of 

the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation of 

the DJI Phantom 2 UAS commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the limited 

purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. By 

granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the 

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, 

by allowing MARK DICONZO to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJI 

Phantom 2 UAS commercially within the NAS. Therefore, in accordance with the Federal 

Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, 

MARK DICONZO respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an 

exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit 

Delta Aerial Imaging to operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS commercially for the purpose of 

conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. 

Dated: June 30, 2015 

 Submitted by 

 MARK DICONZO

BEAUTIFUL DEMON PHOTOGRAPHY

21-62 CRESCENT STREET

APARTMENT C1

ASTORIA, NY 11105

(207)-807-7522
 Email: mark@beautifuldemonphotography.com

 

Appendices:

A – DJI Phantom 2 Specifications Data Sheet

B – DJI Phantom 2 Manufacturer’s User Manual(s)

C – Monthly Maintenance Log

APPENDIX – A

DJI PHANTOM 2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 

MARK DICONZO only utilizes safe and reliable UASs. DJI is an industry leader in small UAS 

production. DJI UASs are loaded with ground breaking software enabling the user to set parameters 

which will not allow flight into controlled airspace. Parameters can also be set to limit flight to no 

higher than a predetermined and set altitude as well as limit flight to a predetermined and set distance. 

In addition, DJI software provides real-time altitude and location information to the PIC via the linked 

monitor (smart phone/tablet devices) 

1.1DJI Phantom 2

1.2 1.1.1 Aircraft 

 1.1.1.1 Supported Battery – DJI 5200MAH LiPo Battery 

1.1.1.2 Weight (Battery & Propellers Included) – 2.20462lbs (1000g)

1.1.1.3 Hover Accuracy (Ready to Fly) – Vertical: .8m; Horizontal: 2.5m 

1.1.1.4 Max Yaw Angular Velocity - 200/s 

1.1.1.5 Max Tilt Angel - 35 1.1.1.6 Max Ascent Speed – 6m/s

1.1.1.7 Max Descent Speed – 2m/s 

1.1.1.8 Max Flight Speed – 15m/s (NOT RECOMMENDED) 

1.1.2 Gimbal 

1.1.2.1 Working Current – Static: 750mA; Dynamic: 900mA 

1.1.2.2 Control Accuracy - ±0.03 

1.1.2.3 Controllable Range – Pitch: -90 - 0 

1.1.2.4 Maximum Angular Speed – Pitch: 90/s 
1.1.3 Camera 

1.1.3.1 Operating Temperature Range - 32F - 104F (0C - 40C) 

1.1.3.2 Sensor Size – 1/2.3‖ 

1.1.3.3 Effective Pixels – 12MP

1.1.3.4 Resolution – 4000x3000

4.1.3.5 HD Video Recording – GoPro Hero4 Black – 1080p30, 2.7k, 4k, & 720p - H.264 / AVC

4.1.3.6 Recording Field of View - 110/85 

APPENDIX-B

DJI PHANTOM 2 USER MANUAL

http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-2/download

APPENDIX-C

DJI PHANTOM 2 USER MANUAL