alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 7, 2012

p1031 

# Order

November 7, 2012

145260

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145260

COA: 303385

Jackson CC: 10

- 005672

- FH

DAVID LEE SWANIGAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 15, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Type text] EPA-420-B-12-019

March 2012

VERIFY 

Schema Change Log of Changes Made for 

Non-Road Compression Ignition and Non-Road Spark Ignition

Purpose

This document identifies XML schema modifications to the VERIFY Non-Road Compression 

Ignition and Nonr-Road Spark Ignition families of schemas. Modifications that involve the 

addition of new schema components were also made according to the current schema 

development paradigm per EPA XML data standard [GD2-E]. For new and modified data 

elements, the annotation following the data element name references the corresponding data

element type description. Note that individual data elements may be used in more locations in 

the schemas than defined in the shared data element file.

NR Modified XML Files

EN_VER_NR_SharedDataElements_v0.95.xsd 

XML Shared Data Element and Data Type File Modifications

The annotation following the data element name references the corresponding data element 

identifiers in the DR spreadsheet. Note that some data elements may be used in more locations 

in the schemas than defined in the DR spreadsheet. 

EN_VER_NR_SharedDataElements_v0.95.xsd 

The following data elements had their data type or enumerations modified. As such, this 

modification has an impact to each schema that the associated data element is used in.

• Data type Decimal12Point3NonNegativeType was added. 

• Data type for FamilyEmissionLimitMeasure [0.0 to 999.9 (NRSI-EV70)] was changed to 

Decimal4Point1NonNegativeType. 

• Data type for FuelCapWorstCaseFamilyEmissionLimitMeasure [g/sq. meter/day, 0.0 to 

999.9 (NRSI-EV51)] was changed to Decimal4Point1NonNegativeType. 

• Data type for PollutantModeTestResultValue [0.000 to 999,999,999.999 (NRCI-TI181)] 

was changed to Decimal12Point3NonNegativeType.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                   1,070,076,000
<SECURITIES>                                 5,014,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              332,901,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              (82,996,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            66,606,000
<PP&E>                                   6,222,403,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           (881,848,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           9,502,273,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      950,598,000
<BONDS>                                  7,598,024,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 900,527,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             9,502,273,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,477,871,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              704,689,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           619,774,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         678,036,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (741,865,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                29,943,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (711,922,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (3,034,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                             (714,956,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.0)


</TABLE>
#### Mose WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-396.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Nov. 18, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Avoiding the slippery slope :conducting effective interventions**
 
Mobi | PDF | epub
 
SuDoc:D 101.146/3:IN 8
Item Number:0307-A-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000902940
 
November 17, 2017
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AI ME C AS T AN E DA , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 71058 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 877- 313 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t14, 2013 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , G R A B E R , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a i m e C a s t a ne da , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order s um m ar i l y di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fro m an i m m i g rat i o n j u d g e’ s (“ IJ”) d eci si o n . O u r j u ri sd i ct i o n i s g o v ern edb y 8 U. S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . We d e n yi n p a rta n dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. 

# FI LED AU G 16 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 71058 2 I n hi s ope ni ng br i e f

, C a s t a ne daf

a i l s t o a ddr e s s , a nd the r e f or e ha s w a i ve d, a nyc ha l l e nge t o the B I A ’ s s um m arydi s m i s s a l of hi s appe a l f

orf a i l ur e t o pr ovi de s t a t e m e nt s s pe c i f

y i ng the r e a s ons unde r l y i ng hi s c ha l l e nge t o the I J ’ s de c i s i on g r a n tin g v o lu n taryd e p a rtu r e . See L op ez -V asqu ezv. H

older , 706 F . 3d 1072, 1079- 80 ( 9th C i r . 2013) ( ape t i t i one rw a i ve s a n i s s ue byf a i l i ng t o r a i s e i ti n the ope ni ng bri ef ). W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w a nyc ha l l e nge t o the B I A ’ s A pr i l 5, 2010, or de rof r e m ova l de t e rm i ni ng tha tC a s t ane dai s s t a tut or i l yi ne l i gi bl e f or cancel l at i on of re m ov albecause the pet i t i on for r evi ew i s nott i m el y a s t o that o r d e r . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( b ) ( 1 ) ; se e al so P i nto v. H

older , 648 F . 3d 976, 985- 86 ( 9th C i r . 2011) ( e xpl a i ni ng tha tthe B I A ’ s or de rde ny i ng r e l i e f f r om r e m ova l a nd r e m a ndi ng t o the I Jf

orvol unt a ryde partur e i s af i na l or de rof

r e m ova l tr i gge r i ng the 30 -daydeadl i ne for pet i t i on i ng for r evi ew of fi nal orders ). I n l i ghtof

ourdi s pos i t i on, w e ne e d nota ddr e s s C a s t ane da ’ s r e m a i ni ng co n t en t i o n s. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
<PAGE>

                                               Exhibit 23.2

Consent from Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


To the Board of Directors
Micros-To-Mainframes, Inc.


We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (No. 333-72269) on Form S-8 of Micros-To-Mainframes, Inc. of
our report dated May 14, 1999 related to the consolidated balance sheet
of Micros-To-Mainframes, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 1999, and
the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the March 31,
1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Micros-To-Mainframes, Inc.




/s/GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York

June 29, 1999

<PAGE>


Consent from Ernst & Young LLP

                       Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8  No. 333-72269) pertaining to the 1996 and
1998 Stock Option Plans of Micros-To-Mainframes, Inc., of our
report dated May 29, 1998, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Micros-To-Mainframes, Inc. at March 31,
1998 and for the two years then ended, included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 1999, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
June 29, 1999
#### In the Interest of Dwight Wayne BIRCHFIELD, a child.

No. 50186.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 8, 1978.

Ward & Ward, James M. Ward, Stark-ville, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Billy L. Gore, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Youth Court, Oktibbeha County; W. W. Brand, Jr., Chancellor.

Before INZER, P. J., ROBERTSON and BOWLING, JJ., and JAMES E. BOST, C.

REVERSED AND APPELLANT DISCHARGED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, BROOM AND LEE, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit (h)(7)**

**ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT**

 

AGREEMENT, dated as of May 1, 2008, among DWS Money Funds, a Massachusetts business trust (the “Trust”), on its own behalf and on behalf of each of the Funds listed on Schedule I to this Agreement (each a “Fund” and together, the “Funds”), and Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Administrator”), effective with respect to each Fund as of the date set out with respect to such Fund on Schedule I to this Agreement, as may be amended from time to time.

WHEREAS, the Trust is engaged in business as an open-end investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”); and

WHEREAS, the Trust desires to retain the Administrator and its permitted designees to provide certain administrative and fund accounting (the “Services”) to the Trust and the Funds on the terms set out in this Agreement, and the Administrator and its designees are willing to provide the Services to the Trust and each Fund on the terms set out in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants contained in this Agreement, the Trust, each Fund, and the Administrator agree as follows:

|   | 1. | *Appointment and Services*. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------|

(a)       The Trust appoints the Administrator to provide the administrative services set out in Appendix A to this Agreement (the “Administrative Services”) for the benefit of the Trust and the Funds.  The Administrator accepts its appointment and agrees to provide the Administrative Services for the compensation set out in this Agreement.

(b)       The Trust appoints the Administrator to provide the fund accounting services set out in Appendix B to this Agreement (the “Fund Accounting Services”) for the benefit of the Trust and the Funds.  The Administrator accepts its appointment and agrees to provide the Fund Accounting Services for the compensation set out in this Agreement.

|   | 2. | *Fees*. |
|--------|----|---------|

(a)       For all Administrative Services and Fund Accounting Services provided under this Agreement, the Administrator will be compensated as set out on Appendix C.  

(b)       The Administrator may from time to time agree not to impose all or a portion of its fee otherwise payable under this Agreement and/or undertake to pay or reimburse the Trust for all or a portion of its expenses not otherwise required to be paid by or reimbursed by the Administrator.  Unless otherwise agreed, any fee reduction or undertaking may be discontinued or modified by the Administrator at any time.  For the month and year in which this Agreement becomes effective or terminates, there will be an appropriate pro ration of any fee based on the number of days that the Agreement is in effect during such month and year, respectively.

 

1

 

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JOHN KOEHNLEIN, JR.,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 279 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                            
<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                        831
<SECURITIES>                                    0  
<RECEIVABLES>                               3,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (264)
<INVENTORY>                                 3,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            9,980
<PP&E>                                     29,730
<DEPRECIATION>                            (12,499)  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             33,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (8,737)
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                      (33)
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,267)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              (33,188)
<SALES>                                   104,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          104,114
<CGS>                                      89,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              17,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,769)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,433)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,336)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (828)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0  
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,164)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (1.34)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-443 (License No. NPF-86)]


North Atlantic Energy Service Corporation and Great Bay Power 
Corporation (Seabrook Station, Unit 1); Order Modifying the Order 
Approving the Restructuring of Great Bay Power Corporation

I

    On January 22, 1997, the NRC issued an Order approving the 
application submitted by Great Bay Power Corporation (Great Bay) 
regarding its proposed corporate restructuring involving the formation 
of a holding company named Great Bay Holdings Corporation. Great Bay is 
a minority non-operating owner of the Seabrook Station, Unit 1. On 
January 24, 1997, Great Bay, through its counsel, submitted a letter 
explaining that the State of New Hampshire informed Great Bay, 
subsequent to the filing of its application with the NRC, that the name 
``Great Bay Holdings Corporation'' is already in use by another legal 
entity in New Hampshire and cannot be used in connection with Great 
Bay's proposed restructuring. Great Bay indicated that in view of the 
foregoing, the name of the new holding company has been changed to 
``BayCorp Holdings, Ltd.'' and requested that the NRC issue an 
administrative addendum to the Order of January 22, 1997, to reflect 
the name change. Great Bay stated that its failure to notify the NRC 
previously of the name change was an oversight on its part.
    On the basis of our review of the circumstances, the Order of 
January 22, 1997, is hereby modified to the extent that all references 
to ``Great Bay Holdings Corporation'' as the name of the proposed 
holding company of Great Bay are deemed to be references to ``BayCorp 
Holdings, Ltd.'' All other terms and conditions of the Order of January 
22, 1997, are unchanged.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of January 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Frank J. Miraglia,
Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-2816 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          13,421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  201,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (13,781)
<INVENTORY>                                    316,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               531,400
<PP&E>                                         289,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                (54,263)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,206,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          183,528
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           599
<OTHER-SE>                                     497,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,026,693
<SALES>                                        382,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               382,150
<CGS>                                          165,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  165,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               229,276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (24,285)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,019)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,113
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,906)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)


</TABLE>
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 1040 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 029 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo20823 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### MIDLAND NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. et al., Petitioners, v. Henry E. FERGUSON and Learnte Ferguson, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 40991.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 6, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Andrew P. Kaplan, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President,
Finance and Administration (principal financial officer) of Audible, Inc. (the
Registrant), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 of
the Registrant (the Report):



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) [15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                       
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.

By: /s/ Andrew P. Kaplan
Name: Andrew P. Kaplan
Date: November 13, 2002