alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27314]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Department of Defense Wage Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed 
meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on 
November 4, 1997; November 18, 1997; and November 25, 1997, at 10:00 
a.m. in Room A105, The Nash Building, 1400 Key Boulevard, Rosslyn, 
Virginia.
    Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the 
Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the 
criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be 
considered are related to internal rules and practices of the 
Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were 
obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed 
to be deserving of the Committee's attention.
    Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by 
writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

    Dated: October 9, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-27314 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### Charles E. VIELE and Margaret E. Viele, his wife, Petitioners, v. Mrs. Betty GALUPPI, Respondent.

No. 39649.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 16, 1970.

Rehearing Denied July 13, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 232 So.2d 408.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Petitioner, v. William E. LONGE, Respondent.

No. 77-2044.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 10, 1978.

*742Kenneth H. Hart, Jr., Gen. Counsel, and Steven H. Parton, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

James R. Parks, Miami, for respondent-Board of Review.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

For our review is an order of the Board of Review which vacated the orders of an appeals referee disallowing unemployment compensation benefits to Mr. Longe. We grant certiorari under the authority of Section 20.17(5)(7), Florida Statutes (1977).

In applying Section 443.06(8), Florida Statutes (1977), the appeals referee said Mr. Longe was not entitled to unemployment compensation because he was receiving retirement benefits from the state in excess of what he was allowed to receive in unemployment compensation. The Board of Review vacated that order saying Mr. Longe should be allowed to recoupe the amount he contributed to the retirement fund. As we held in *City of Ft. Lauderdale v. Fowler,*355 So.2d 159 (Fla. 4 DCA 1978); and as it was held in *Fla. Dept. of Commerce v. Todd,*353 So.2d 662 (Fla. 2 DCA 1978), we again hold that a person receiving retirement or pension benefits cannot receive unemployment compensation in any week in which his retirement or pension benefits meet or exceed the unemployment compensation to which he would have been entitled. Section 443.06(8), Florida Statutes (1977).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari is granted and the order of the Board of Review is quashed and the cause is remanded to the Board of Review with directions to affirm the order of the appeals referee.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and MOORE, J., concur.
Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Statement 

The U.S. Department of Transportation embraces equal employment opportunity (EEO) and 

inclusiveness and maintains a model Federal work environment that is free of discrimination. 

No employee, former employee, or applicant for employment at the Department will be denied 

equal opportunity because of race, color, sex, national origin, religion, age, disability, pregnancy, 

sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, retaliation, or any other non-merit-based 

factor. This not only is the law; it is an essential component of the Department’s mission and our 

responsibility to the public we serve. 

I am committed to fostering an inclusive workforce that reflects America’s diversity through 

effective outreach, recruitment, hiring, promotion, employee development, and equitable 

treatment of the Department’s employees, recipients, and other partners and stakeholders whom 

we work with, through, and for. We will continue to identify and eliminate barriers to equal 

employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities and groups with a low participation 

rate in our workforce. I also expect all managers and supervisors to ensure that our employees 

are given equal opportunity for training and career development programs, promotions, awards 

and recognition, and other applicable terms, conditions, benefits, and privileges of employment. 

All Department employees, former employees, and applicants for employment have the right to 

raise allegations of discrimination and harassment without fear of reprisal. We will take swift 

and appropriate corrective and/or disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal, when 

employees are found to have engaged in discrimination, retaliation, or harassment, which are 

prohibited by our policies regardless of whether the discrimination, retaliation, or harassment 

violates Federal law. 

Employees, former employees, and applicants for employment who believe they have been 

subjected to unlawful discrimination or retaliation for opposing discrimination in the 

Department, or hindered from participating in the employment discrimination complaint process, 

are encouraged to contact an EEO Counselor, their Office of Civil Rights, or our Departmental 

Office of Civil Rights within 45 calendar days from the date of the alleged discrimination or 

retaliation or from the date on which they reasonably became aware of the discrimination or 

retaliation. If a formal complaint is filed and accepted, there will be a prompt, thorough, and 

impartial investigation, and we will keep confidential, to the greatest extent possible, the facts of 

these investigations. 

I am committed to ensuring that the Department operates in accordance with principles of equity 

and fairness and that our workplace environment is safe, productive, and free from 

discrimination. 

Pete Buttigieg 

June 9, 2022
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26082]



[[Page 51653]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2680-039]


Consumers Energy Company; Notice of Availability of Draft 
Environmental Assessment

September 26, 1997.
    A draft environmental assessment (DEA) is available for public 
review. The DEA was prepared for a plan to construct angler access 
facilities at what is known as the Port Sheldon site. The plan was 
required by ordering paragraph (C) of the Order Approving Settlement 
Agreement Regarding Fishery Issues, issued by the Commission on January 
23, 1996. The Port Sheldon site is located adjacent to Lake Michigan 
and Pigeon Lake, near the Town of West Olive, Michigan.
    The DEA finds that the licensee's plan is not a major federal 
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. 
The DEA was written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the DEA can be viewed 
at the Commission's Reference and Information Center, Room 2A, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Copies can also be obtained by 
contacting the project manager listed below.
    Please submit any comments within 40 days from the date of this 
notice. Any comments, conclusions, or recommendations that draw upon 
studies, reports, or other working papers of substance should be 
supported by appropriate documentation.
    Comments should be addressed to: Ms. Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. Please include the project number (2680-039) on 
any comments filed. For further information, you may contact the 
project manager, Patti Pakkala, at (202) 219-0025.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26082 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27535]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MEDICARE PAYMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION


Notice of Meetings

    Notice is hereby given of the meetings of the Medicare Payment 
Advisory Commission on Wednesday and Thursday, October 23 and 24, 1997, 
at the Embassy Row Hilton, 2015 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, 
DC, 202/265-1600.
    The Commission meeting will convene at 8:30 a.m. on October 23, 
1997, and adjourn at approximately 5:00 p.m. On Friday, October 24, 
1997, the meeting will convene at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 
approximately 3:00 p.m. The meetings will be held in the Ambassador 
Room each day.
    All meetings are open to the public.
Donald A. Young,
Co-Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-27535 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-BW-M
#### Sam WASHINGTON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50260.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 1, 1978.

Charles O. Jones, Jackson, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Karen Gil-foy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Russel D. Moore, Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### Elias GANEM, Appellant, v. Herlinda Ganem de ISSA et al., Appellees.

No. 70-989.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 23, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 26, 1971.

Stanley P. Kaplan, and Hansford D. Tyler, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Smathers & Thompson, and William C. Lewis, Jr., Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Cf. Minor v. Minor, Fla. 1970, 240 So.2d 301; and Morris v. Rabara, Fla.App. 1962, 145 So.2d 265.
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alan Margerison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company (or equivalent) with the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used by any person
or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.


                                        /s/ Alan Margerison
                                        -------------------
                                        Alan Margerison
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        April 14, 2004
UN I TED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTE C TION A G EN CY WAS H I N GTO N , D . C . 20460

OFFICE OF AIR A N D RAD I ATIO N 

### MEMORANDUM Subject: From: To: S ummar y of Stakeholder Meetings Ca ri ssa Cy ran Doc ket s EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602. EPA - HQ- OAR-2013 - 0603 . and EPA-liQOAR-20 13-04 95 T hi s me mor andum s ummari zes meetings wi th s take holde rs during the week of Jun e 29 . 2015 . On June 29, Admini s trator McCa rth y, Ac tin g Assistant A dmini s trator for Ai r and Radiation Jan et McCabe. and Assoc iate Ass is tant Ad mini s tr at o r fo r C lim ate and Sen io r Counsel for A ir a

nd Radiation J osep h GotT man met with l ea d ers hip from labor organizations. including AFL C I O. IB EW. US W , SMA RT . U nited Associat ion. U MW A. and UW UA. On Jun e 29. Assoc iat e Ass istant Ad mini s trator l o r Clim ate and Se nior Counsel for Air and Radi a ti on J osep h GotTman me t w ith S t eve n Corncli. Sen i o r Vic e Pr esiden t for Sus ta inab ilit y . S trat egy. and Policy for RG Energy . On Jun e 30, Assoc iat e Ass istan t Adm ini s trator fo r Climate and Sen ior Cou n se l for A ir a n d Radi a ti o n Jo sep h G o ffm an met w ith Arvi n Ganesan of Advanced Ene rgy Economy . On Jul y l. Assoc iate Ass istant Administrator for C limate and Sen io r Counse l for A i r and Radiati o n Jo sep h GofTrnan m e t wit h Daw it Kah sai of AARP.

Internet Ad d ress (UR L I • h ll p 1/www epa gov Recy c led / Recyclable • Pnnted woth Vegetable 0• Based Inks on 100 Postconsumer Process Ch1011ne Free Recycled Paper
259 La. 57

#### George L. BABIN, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of his minor child, George L. Babin, Jr. v. William CASBY, Jr., Universal Life Insurance Company, and New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc.

No. 51482.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1971.

In re: George Babin, Sr., Individually and as Administrator of the estate of the minor child, George Babin, Jr. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 247 So.2d 226.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Hills, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.

Date: May 10, 2007



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    David B. Hills  
|       |  |                        
|Name:  |  | David B. Hills         
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

I, John Simonelli, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.

Date: May 10, 2007



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    John Simonelli  
|       |  |                        
|Name:  |  | John Simonelli         
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
1 Ostigaard, Crystal

From: Robert Merchant [merch57@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 4:11 PM To: Ostigaard, Crystal Subject: Designate Yellowstone County, Montana, as a non-att ainment area for air quality.

Dear Ms. Ostigaard,

As a physician specializing in lung disease in Bill ings, MT I care for many people who are adversely i mpacted by the air quality here. The research data is very clear that even SO2 at levels deemed acceptable by EPA standards are causing harm. It is therefor extreme ly important that the current standards be enforced

. The 2010 data can not be ignored. Yellowstone County should be designated as in non-attainment in locations wh ere 2009 to 2011 show one hour violations. All the are as with SO2 violations should be included in the no nattainment areas.

The EPA has done a incredible job safeguarding our health. Thank you for your work and efforts.

Sincerely, Robert K. Merchant, M.D. 3270 Gregory Dr. W. Billings, MT 59102 406-652-6420
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEOFFREY WILSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JAMES TILTON; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-55032

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-02454-JVS-JC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 16, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Former California state prisoner Geoffrey Wilson appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging, among other

things, violations of his constitutional right to adequate dental care. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to

FILED

APR 23 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-55032

exhaust administrative remedies and for clear error any underlying factual findings. 

Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Wilson’s Eighth Amendment claims

against defendants Farber-Szekreni, Kuykendall, and Ashley without prejudice

because Wilson failed properly to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing

suit, and he failed to provide sufficient evidence to show that administrative

remedies were effectively unavailable to him. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81,

85, 93-95 (2006) (holding that “proper exhaustion” is mandatory and requires

adherence to administrative procedural rules); Sapp v. Kimbrell, 623 F.3d 813, 826

(9th Cir. 2010) (administrative remedies are “available” where administrative

appeals are screened for proper reasons). 

We do not consider Wilson’s other claims because Wilson has not raised

them on appeal. See Wilcox v. Comm’r, 848 F.2d 1007, 1008 n.2 (9th Cir. 1988)

(arguments not raised on appeal by pro se litigant deemed abandoned).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Wilson leave to file

a Second Amended Complaint where amendment would have been futile. See

Gordon v. City of Oakland, 627 F.3d 1092, 1094 (9th Cir. 2010).
3 12-55032

Wilson’s contention that the district court failed to address his Eighth

Amendment claim against defendant Ashley is unpersuasive because the district

court dismissed the claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 

Defendants’ motion to augment the appellate record, filed on August 8,

2012, is granted. 

Defendants’ motion to take judicial notice, filed on August 8, 2012, is

denied as unnecessary. 

Wilson’s opposed motion to augment the appellate record, filed on August

23, 2012, is granted.

AFFIRMED.
# App4
#### Elmer BOYETTE, Petitioner, v. TALQUIN ELECTRIC CO-OPERATIVE, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 39386.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1, 1970.

John S. Miller, Jr., Truett & Watkins, and Hal S. Davis, of Lewis, Davis & Mc-Clamma, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

H. O. Pemberton, of Keen, O’Kelley & Spitz, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

*389PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Industrial Relations Commission.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10(e), 32 F.S.A.

We conclude from our consideration of the petition, the record, and the briefs that the order of the Commission must be quashed on authority of the decision of this Court in Brown v. Griffin, 1970, 229 So.2d 225, and the cause remanded with directions that the matter be returned to the Judge of Industrial Claims for further findings of fact on the evidence already taken, in compliance with our opinions in Brown v. Griffin, supra, and Hardy v. City of Tarpon Springs, 1955, 81 So.2d 503.

The petition for attorney’s fees filed by Petitioner is granted in the amount of $250.00.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur.
Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

**Author: Date Created:**  **Date Modified: Purpose:**  **File Contents: Worksheet**  Rates DataPullInfo **Input Files:** External data used in calculations/analysis: None

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3321 FileInfo 1Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

Abt Associates Inc. 6/12/2008 5/5/2014 Contains adjustment factors based on Employment Cost Index (ECI). **Contents** Contains adjustment factors based on Employment Cost Index (ECI). These adjustment factors are used to bring administrative cost values to a given year and state these values in dollars of that year. Contains data pull information, including the date of the data pull and sources.

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3321 FileInfo 2Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

**Data Sources:**

**Date Downloaded: Created By:**  **Av ailable at:**  **Notes:**

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3321 DataPullInfo 1Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

Employment Cost Index Historical Listing Current-Dollar March 2001 - June 2012 -->Table 1: Employme nt Cost Index for Total Compensation by occupational group and industry (Seasonally

Adjusted) ---->Data for "Civilian Workers" Employment Cost Index Historical Listing Current-dollar 1975-2005 -->TABLE 1a. EMPLOYMENT COST INDEX (COMPENSATION), CIVILIAN, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT, AND PRIVATE INDUSTRY W ORKERS2 BY OCCUPATION AND INDUSTRY GROUP (Seasonally adjusted) ---->Data for "Civilian Workers" Source 1: 10/26/2012 Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS) http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ect/ectsfact.htm (http://www.bls.gov/web/eci/echistrynaics.pdf) ECI values for 2001 through 2005 are available from both documents.

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3321 DataPullInfo 2Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule -->Table 1: Employme nt Cost Index for Total Compensation by occupational group and industry (Seasonally

Adjusted) -->TABLE 1a. EMPLOYMENT COST INDEX (COMPENSATION), CIVILIAN, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT, AND PRIVATE INDUSTRY W ORKERS2 BY OCCUPATION AND INDUSTRY GROUP (Seasonally adjusted)

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3321 DataPullInfo 3Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

-->TABLE 1a. EMPLOYMENT COST INDEX (COMPENSATION), CIVILIAN, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT, AND PRIVATE INDUSTRY W ORKERS2 BY OCCUPATION AND INDUSTRY GROUP (Seasonally adjusted)

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3321 DataPullInfo 4Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

**Civilian Workers**

**Year An**  **nual A vg**  **Ma rch**  **June Sept**  **Dec Actual**  ECI_1996 71.95 71.2 71.7 72.2 72.7 ECI_1997 74.08 73.2 73.8 74.3 75.0 ECI_1998 76.58 75.6 76.2 77.0 77.5 ECI_1999 79.00 77.8 78.6 79.4 80.2 ECI_2000 82.45 81.2 82.1 82.9 83.6 ECI_2001 85.95 84.7 85.5 86.4 87.2 ECI_2002 89.08 87.9 88.8 89.5 90.1 ECI_2003 92.43 91.2 92.0 92.9 93.6 ECI_2004 95.90 94.6 95.5 96.4 97.1 ECI_2005 99.00 98.0 98.6 99.3 100.1 ECI_2006 102.08 100.7 101.6 102.6 103.4 ECI_2007 105.50 104.2 105.1 105.9 106.8

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3321 Rates 1