alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ProxyMed, Inc.,
d/b/a MedAvant Healthcare Solutions;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
the statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15f and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed
under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ PETER E. FLEMING, III
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:
           February 16,  2010
                By:
                /s/ Guy
      De VreeseName:  Guy
      De VreeseTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer
                  (Principal Executive
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Remedent, Inc. and will be retained by
Remedent, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26884]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Division of Research Grants; Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda:  To review individual grant applicants.
    Name of SEP:  Microbiological and Immunological Sciences.
    Date:  November 3, 1997.
    Time:  11:30 a.m.
    Place:  NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4186, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person:  Dr. Gerald Liddel, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4186, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1150.

    Name of SEP:  Chemistry and Related Sciences.
    Date:  November 18, 1997.
    Time:  12:30 p.m..
    Place:  NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4172, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person:  Dr. Donald Schneider, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4172, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1727.

    Name of SEP:  Biological and Physiological Sciences.
    Date:  November 19, 1997.
    Time:  2:00 p.m..
    Place:  NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 5124, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person:  Dr. Everett Sinnett, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5124, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1016.

    Name of SEP:  Chemistry and Related Sciences.
    Date:  December 10-12, 1997.
    Time:  8:00 p.m.
    Place:  Radisson Hotel, Lansing, MI.
    Contact Person:  Dr. Richard Panniers, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5106, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1166.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
pattentable material and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-26884 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Quinton Bederead BASS, Appellee.

No. N-415.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 20, 1970.

Earl Faircloth, Atty Gen., and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Vera Winter Lee, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

By this interlocutory appeal the State of Florida questions a finding by the trial judge that a search under the circumstances hereafter detailed was illegal. We conclude that the State’s position is well taken and reverse.

Appellee Bass was charged by information with possession of a short-barreled (less than 18 inches) shotgun. The testimony at the hearing on motion to suppress the tangible evidence obtained as the result of an unreasonable search and seizure reflects that appellee’s automobile was involved in an automobile accident in the early nighttime in the City of Ocala. A police officer, while investigating the accident, shone his flashlight into the interior of Bass’s car, and observed a sawed-off shotgun protruding from under the front seat. The officer directed appellee to hand him the shotgun. Upon examination of the shotgun and a determination that it was of such a type as prohibited by F.S. § 790.001(10), F.S.A., the officer placed ap-pellee under arrest.

Appellee contends that the shining of a flashlight inside a vehicle by a police officer who is lawfully on the scene constitutes an unlawful search, and that same contravenes the defendant’s rights as protected by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and Article I, Section 12, of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A.

This Court recently held in Donar v. State, 236 So.2d 145 (1970), inter alia:

> “It is elementary that every search without a warrant, if seeing what is obvious by the beams of a flashlight can be termed a search, is not an unlawful or unreasonable search condemned by provisions *91of the State and Federal Constitutions. Gispert v. State, 118 So.2d 596 (Fla.App.2d 1960).”

Reversed with directions to the trial court to set aside its finding that the search was illegal.

JOHNSON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3274 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide the work opportunity 

tax credit with respect to hiring veterans who are receiving educational 

assistance under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

or Defense. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2023 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

the work opportunity tax credit with respect to hiring 

veterans who are receiving educational assistance under 

laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

or Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hire Student Veterans 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3274 IS

1 SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT FOR HIRING VET2 ERANS RECEIVING EDUCATIONAL ASSIST3 ANCE UNDER LAWS ADMINISTERED BY THE 

4 SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OR DE5 FENSE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(d)(3)(A) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ 

8 at the end of clause (iii), by striking the period at the 

9 end of clause (iv) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at 

10 the end the following new clause: 

11 ‘‘(v) attending an educational institu12 tion by means of educational assistance 

13 provided under chapter 30, 31, 32, 33, or 

14 34 of title 38, United States Code, or 

15 chapter 1606 or 1607 of title 10, United 

16 States Code.’’. 

17 (b) MODIFICATION OF MINIMUM EMPLOYMENT PE18 RIOD.—Section 51(i)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 

19 of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘(other than a qualified 

20 veteran described in subsection (d)(3)(A)(v))’’ after ‘‘In 

21 the case of an individual’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

24 the employer after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Jones, No. S1545-09 CnC (Toor, J., Oct. 12, 2010) 

[The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the 

accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] 

VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT

CHITTENDEN UNIT

CIVIL DIVISION

│ 

GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC │ 

 Plaintiff │ 

│ 

 v. │ Docket No. S1545-09 CnC 

│ 

CYNTHIA K. JONES, et al. │ 

 Defendants │ 

│ 

ORDER

This is a foreclosure case raising an issue that has lately been all over the news: 

the massive filing of potentially false affidavits by certain lenders in foreclosure cases 

across the country. A foreclosure judgment was issued based upon an affidavit of 

amounts due signed by Jeffrey Stephan. Plaintiff has recently submitted an amended 

affidavit of amounts due, indicating that the prior one “may not have been executed on 

personal knowledge of the affiant and may not have been executed in the physical 

presence of a notary public.” Letter of Joshua Lobe, Esq. dated October 4, 2010. The 

new affidavit is proffered as “a corrective Affidavit, which does not have these defects.” 

Id. 

While the court appreciates the candor of Plaintiff’s counsel and attributes no 

inappropriate conduct to him, the court is at a loss to understand how it can rely upon an 

affidavit from a party that has apparently previously filed a false affidavit with the court. 

The court therefore declines to rely upon the written affidavit. The court will require that 

the affiant appear personally in court to testify to the accuracy of the information in the 

affidavit – not by telephone, but in person, so that the court can fully judge the affiant’s 
2

credibility. A hearing will be scheduled for that purpose. If the court is not convinced of 

the reliability of the information, the judgment may be vacated. 

The court strongly urges Ms. Jones to seek legal representation for the hearing, so 

that all potential legal issues may be raised by both sides. 

Dated at Burlington, Vermont this 12th day of October, 2010. 

 _____________________________ 

 Helen M. Toor 

 Superior Court Judge
#### In Re a MINOR CHILD

In the High Court of American Samoa Trial Division

JR No. 46-93

December 1, 1993

Before RICHMOND, Associate Justice, TAUANU‘U, Chief Associate Judge, and MAILO, Associate Judge.

Counsel: For Petitioners, Tautai A.F. Fa‘alevao

Order Denying Motion for Rehearing or Reconsideration:

Petitioners’ motion for rehearing or reconsideration came regularly for hearing on October 27, 1993. Petitioners appeared by counsel.

The best interests of all persons concerned, and especially those of the minor child, must be served by the outcome of a proceeding for the relinquishment a parent-child relationship. A.S.C.A. § 45.0402(e); *In re a Minor,*14 A.S.R.2d 54, 55 (Trial Div. 1990); *In re a Minor Child,*14 A.S.R. 82, 83 (Trial Div. 1990).

In this case, the grandparents’ attention and devotion to their eight-month old granddaughter is apparent. This relationship can continue to be nurtured. Indeed, if all concerned continue to agree, the grandparents are certainly free to remain the child’s primary care-givers, as is often done traditionally. However, this is different than a legal termination of the natural parental relationship, which could leave the child without legal recourse for support during her still long period of dependency. The grandparents are in their sixties, while the natural parents are in their twenties. All five persons live in the same household. Under these circumstances, it is not in the long-term best interests of the child, regardless of present financial circumstances, to *71have her relationship with her natural parents legally severed at such a tender age.

The motion is denied.

It is so ordered.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Financial Statements for the 3 months ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such form 10QSB for three months ended March 31,
2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                      <C>

<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                         346,388
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               381,496
<PP&E>                                                          12,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   3,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               1,213,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          153,521
<BONDS>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                            32
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   1,059,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 1,213,036
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 2,485
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  171,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               6,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (175,514)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (175,514)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (175,514)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (.04)



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 January 7, 2011 

No. 10-2966

Efrain Hidalgo, Sr., 

 Appellant 

v. 

Raymond Sobina, et al. 

(W.D. Pa. No. 3-08-cv-00138) 

Present: BARRY and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges

 Motion by Appellant to File Exhibit to Petition for Rehearing. 

 

Respectfully, 

 Stephanie/smw 

_________________________________ORDER________________________________ 

The motion for leave to file an exhibit to the petition for rehearing is granted. The 

petition for panel rehearing is granted and the Court's order, filed December 3, 2010, is 

hereby vacated. As Judge Fisher is recused, this appeal will be assigned to a 

reconstituted panel of the Court. 

 By the Court, 

 

 /s/Maryanne Trump Barry 

 Circuit Judge 

Dated: February 10, 2011 

Smw/cc: Efrain Hidalgo, Sr. 

 Andrea F. McKenna, Esq. 

A True Copy:

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                     -----------



      Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I,  James  K.  McHugh,  the  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  N-Viro International
Corporation,  certify  that  (i)  the  Form  10-KSB  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and  (ii)  the  information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of N-Viro
International  Corporation.


/s/  James  K.  McHugh
----------------------
James  K.  McHugh,  Chief  Financial  Officer
March  31,  2006
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quepasa Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Matte, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | /s/ MICHAEL D. MATTE   
| | Michael D. Matte       
| | Chief Financial Officer



Date: October 24, 2008
#### Aubrey SHEFFIELD, Appellant, v. Jimmy W. GAINER, Appellee.

No. L-85.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Nov. 18, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Motorvehicle use map. Boise National Forest. Mountain Home Ranger District, Idaho**
 
2013: FrontBack| 2014: FrontBack | 2017: FrontBack
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28: B 63/14/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:000946254
 
June 28, 2018
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003)

I,  Donald  R.  Katz,  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer)  of  Audible,  Inc.  (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best of my
knowledge, based upon review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended  September  30,  2003  of  the  Registrant  (the  "Report"):

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of Section 13(a)
          [15(d)]  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Registrant.


   /s/  Donald  R.  Katz
------------------------------
Name: Donald R. Katz
Date: November ___, 2003


<PAGE>