FHWA:HSST:NArtimovich:sf:x61331:5/7/14: Updated by NArtimovich 5/23/14 

File: s://directory folder/hsst/nartimovich/B250_XavierC_Guardrail (2).docx 

cc: HSST (Reader, HSA; Chron File, HSST; NArtimovich, HSST), BFouch, HSST 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

May 20, 2014 

In Reply Refer To: 

HSST/B-250 

Ms. Sydney D. Chase 

XavierC, LLC 

1220 Pennell Drive 

Glendora California 91740 

Dear Ms. Chase: 

This letter is in response to your request for the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to 

review a roadside safety system for eligibility for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway 

program. 

Name of system: Non Blocked BMS2-TL3 Single Steel Guardrail 

Type of system: 31-inch Tall High Strength W-beam Guardrail on C posts. 

Test Level:	 MASH Test Level 3 

Testing conducted by: CIDAUT of Spain 

Task Force 13 Designator: SGR51 

Date of request: March 8, 2014 

Date of completed package: April 13, 2014 

Decision: 

The following device is eligible, with details provided in the form which is attached as an 

integral part of this letter. This letter applies to the Length of Need of the BMS2-TL3 guardrail. 

Complete barrier systems need crashworthy terminals to anchor the barrier, and transitions to 

rigid barriers or bridge rails. The sloped anchors used in the crash tests and shown in the attached 

drawings adequately anchored the barrier length of need but were not of a crashworthy design. 

•	 Non Blocked BMS2-TL3 Single Steel Guardrail, 31 inch height, W-beam of Grade 

70 steel per ASTM A 607, mounted on “C” posts. 

Based on a review of crash test results submitted by the manufacturer certifying the device 

described herein meets the crash test and evaluation criteria of the American Association of State 

Highway and Transportation Officials’ Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH), the 

device is eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program. Eligibility for 

reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program does not establish approval or 

endorsement by the FHWA for any particular purpose or use. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 

The FHWA, the Department of Transportation, and the United States Government do not 

endorse products or services and the issuance of a reimbursement eligibility letter is not an 

endorsement of any product or service. 

Requirements 

To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding, roadside safety devices should meet the crash test 

and evaluation criteria contained in the American Association of State Highway and 

Transportation Officials’ Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). 

Description 

The device and supporting documentation are described in the attached form. 

Summary and Standard Provisions 

Therefore, the system described and detailed in the attached form is eligible for reimbursement 

and may be installed under the range of conditions tested. 

Please note the following standard provisions that apply to FHWA eligibility letters: 

•	 This letter provides a AASHTO/ARTBA/AGC Task Force 13 designator that should 

be used for the purpose of the creation of a new and/or the update of existing Task 

Force 13 drawing for posting on the on-line ‘Guide to Standardized Highway Barrier 

Hardware’ currently referenced in AASHTO Roadside Design Guide. 

•	 This finding of eligibility does not cover other structural features of the systems, nor 

conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 

•	 Any changes that may influence system conformance with MASH will require a new 

reimbursement eligibility letter. 

•	 Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service 

performance reveals safety problems, or that the system is significantly different from 

the version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to modify or revoke this letter. 

•	 You are expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and 

installation requirements to ensure proper performance. 

•	 You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the 

same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for review, 

and that it will meet the test and evaluation criteria of the MASH. 

•	 To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of eligibility is designated as 

number B-250 and shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test 

documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and 

documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request. 

•	 This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, 

manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent 

holder. The FHWA does not become involved in issues concerning patent law. 

Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant. 

•	 Steel used in guardrail is a material subject to the Buy America requirements. These 

requirements, including waiver provisions, are found in Title 23 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations, Section 635.410. Please note that all manufacturing processes of 
3 

steel and iron materials, including the application ofcoatings for these materials, must 

occur in the United States. 

• 	 The XavierC, LLC, W-beam guardrail system is a patented product and considered 

proprietary. If proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on 

Federal-aid projects: (a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with 

equally suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are 

essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally 

suitable alternative exists; or (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive 

type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. 

Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of 

Federal Regulations, Section 635.411. 

Sincerely yours, 

Michael S. Griffith 

Director, Office of Safety Technologies 

Office of Safety 

Enclosures 
Version 7.0 (3/13) 

Page 2 of S 

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility 

OfHighway Safety Hardware 

Date of Request: 3-8-2014 (.New \Resubmission 

... 

.t:"

·e 

.a 

:I 

II) 

Name: 

Company: 

Aaaress: 

Country: 

Sydney D. Chase 

XavlerC. LLC 

1220 Pennell Drive Glendora, CA 

USA 

Signature: 

To: Michael S. Griffith, Director 

FHWA, Office of Safety Technologies 

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid 

highway program. 

fHeiPl 

System Type Submission lype Devke Name I Variant Testing Criterion Test 

Level 

'B': Barriers (Roadside, 

Median. Bridge Ralllngs) 

(e Physical Crash Testing 

\ FEA &V&V Analysis 

BMS2-TL3 Single Steel 

Guardrail 

AASHTOMASH TL3 

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration, I certify 

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety 

Hardware and that the evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH. 

Identification of the individual or organization responsible for the product: 

Contact Name: Sydney D. Chase Same as Submitter t8J 

Company Name: XavierC. UC Same as Submitter t8J 

Address: 1220 Pennell Drive Glendora, CA Same as Submitter t8J 

Country: USA Same as Submitter t8J 
Version 7.0 (3/13) 

Page 3 of 5 

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 

(i' New Hardware (' Modification to 

Existing Hardware I 

The non-blocked BMS2-Tl3 Single Steel Guardrail (BMS2-Tl.3-161213-l-004) consists of W-beam sections made 

from hot rolled steel sheet with the following characteristics: Class 2 Grade 70 to base steel per ASTM A607; 

Class Ato base metal, nominal thickness according to standard AASHTO M180. W-beam Is Installed at a 

nominal height of 31" at the top ofthe embedded post. The posts are are made from hot rolled steel sheets 

with characteristics per ASTM A36; Class A base metal nominal thickness per AASHTO M 180. The W-Beam end 

shoe Is made from hot rolled steel sheet per Class 33 to base steel, per ASTM A570. Guardrail ls hot dip 

galvanized per ASTM A 123 (AASHTO M 111) In addition must comply with Type IofStandard Specification 

AASHTO M180. 

!The rail ls mounted on C125 posts that are 67" long, and set at 6'3" centers. The posts are embedded 36" Into 

the ground. The splice ofthe W-Beams are bolted tothe face of every other post at 12' 6". The bolts to join 

splice are Ml 6X30 round head bolts; the bolts used to join W-beam to posts are M16X40 all made of steel per 

ASTM A307 Grade A. The hex nuts, M16 per ASTM A 563 for Class 5. The W-Beam splices shall use round steel 

washers according to ISO 7091 minimum hardness of 100 Hv. A rectangular plate washer (located under the 

neck and over the W-beam and squared washer, located just under the nut Inside the post) are both made of 

hot rolled steel sheet of Grade 33 per ASTM A570. Bolts fastening W-Beam to the post shall be tightened with a 

torque between 30 N.m. and 50 N.m. All remaining joints shall be tightened with a torque from 60 N.m.to 80 

N.m~ except W-beam joints, which are joined with a torque from between 130 N.m.to 150 N.m. 
Required Test 

Number 

3-10 (1100C) 

3-11 (2270P) 

Narrative 


Description 


The results ofTest No. E14-0'>01 (MASH 3-10) conducted January 

8, 2014are found in Report No.0109-131031/0l_ENG.A small car 

(2420 lbs), with a simulated occupant in the left front seat, 

impacted the non-blocked BMS2-TL3 Single Steel Guardrail, 

installed at a height of31 ", at a speed of625 MPH at an angle of 

255 degrees. The Impact severity was 5.4% greater than the target. 

At .044 s after impact the left front comer ofvehicle contacted 

between post no. 15 and 16. Vehicle began to redirect and run 

parallel to system at post no. 18 at .260 s. At 564 s the vehicle lost 

contact with rail traveling at an exit speed of 35.1 MPH at 10 

degrees coming to rest 282.9' downstream toward traffic face ofthe 

guardrail at 32.8'. 

Damage to vehicle was moderate. Minimal occupant deformations 

occurred to the leftside floor pan. A maximum transversal 

deflection of 1.60". Damage to the barrier was moderate and 

consisted ofdeformed and disengaged posts, contact marks on 

post and guardrail, and deformed W-beam rail. Maximum dynamic 

deflection of rail was 3.17' and maximum permanent deformation 

was 2.42'; worldng width 3.93'. All occupant risk measures were well 

below recommended values, and the test vehicle showed no 

tendency to roll over. The system comfortably met the criterion of 

MASH 3-10. 

The resu Its ofTest No. E 13-3032 (MASH 3-11) conducted December 

30, 2013 are found in Report No.0109-131031/0l_ENG. A pickup 

truck (5,000 lbs), with a simulated occupant in the left front seat 

and installed ata heightof31", traveling atan Impactspeed of 62.6 

MPH impacted the non-blocked BMS2-n3 Single Steel Guardrail 

155' at an Impact angle of25.4 degrees. The left side ofthe front 

bumperimpacted between post 14 and 15. At 0.040 s after impact, 

the left front tire contacted post no. 15, the vehicle began to 

redirect. The left front wheel ofthe vehicle contacted post no. 16 at 

0.124 s. The left front comer ofthe bumper ofthe vehicle contacted 

post no. 17 at 0.166 s, and it contacted post no. 18 at 0.242 s. The 

vehicle began traveling parallel with the BMS2-Tl3 Single Steel 

Guardrail at 0.270 s. At 0.370 s after impact, the left front tire 

contacted the post no. 19; it contacted the post no. 20 at 0.485 s. At 

0.614 s, thevehlcle lost contact with the rail while traveling at an 

exit speed and angle of 39.9 MPH and 4.3 degrees. The vehicle 

came to rest 128.0' downstream ofImpact and 0.0' toward the 

traffic face ofthe ran. 

Damage to vehicle was moderate. Minimal occupant deformations 

occurred to the left side floor pan A maximum transversal 

deflection of.55". Damage to the barrier was moderate and 

consisted ofdeformed and disengaged posts, contact marks on 

post and guardrail, and deformed W-beam rail. Maximum dynamic 

deflection of rail was 4.06' and maximum permanent deformation 

was 2.80'; working width 4.75'. All occupant risk measures were well 

below recommended values, and the test vehicle showed no 

tendency to roll over. The system comfortably met the criterion of 

MASH 3-11 . 

Version 7 .0 (3/13) 

Page 4 of 5 


Evaluation Results 


PASS 

PASS 

3-20 (11OOC) WAIVER REQUESTED 
Version 7.0 (3/13) 

Page 5 of 5 

CRASH TESTING 

A brief description of each crash test and its result: 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description Evaluation Results 

3-21 (2270P) WAIVER REQUESTED 

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test 

laboratory (cite the laboratory's accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports.): 

Laboratory Name: ClDAUT 

Laboratory Contact: Oscar Blanco Salgado & Jose Alberto De Prado Rodriguez Same as Submitter 0 

Address: Parque Technologico de Boecillo P-209 47151 Boeclllo. 

Valladolid Same as Submitter 0 

Country: SPAIN Same as Submitter 0 

Accreditation Certificate 

Number and Date: ISO 17025 ENAC Accreditiation No 412/LE858 

ATTACHMENTS 

Attach to this form: 

1) A copy of the full test report, video, and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in 

support of this request. 

2) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications 

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards). For proprietary products, a single isometric line drawing is 

usually acceptable to illustrate the product, with detailed specifications, intended use, and contact 

information provided on the reverse. Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that 

are key to understanding the performance of the device should also be submitted to facilitate our 

review. 

FHWA Official Business Only: 

Eligibility Letter 

Number I Date 

I 

AASHTOTF13 

Designator Key Words 
cidaUi .

XavierC, LLC

r • BMS2-TL3 SINGLE STEEL GUARDRAIL 

TestRepon 0109-131031/01_ENG Date: t-1011nm 02/ 26 / 2014 Tesl Level TL-3 / MASH:2009 

:a ~ d ; 

~-~H~ I -­ l~P ! ,_ 

,L

I ·z ·,­ ~hl

'· \\~ -- ~ 

,~ 

r 

"I .k <( . / 

, j ~ ~b /1 :. ; ... ~ I 

~J id ' .. (

'... 1!11' ~, ~r ~ \ 

.. . Q~ Ji .. V.1-----­ \ 

- •;: ;; •-!~-1 ... ~ ' ..... 

c5 . - . ., / .( .. ,. ' l~

I 

! 

~,,. 

ii ~ Si. I 

"' @ ;!J

~ ii

x "' ~ s; Jr, ~ ~ 2.AJ . 

£ ~ £tr.

- < 

..J

.. "' I / ;i ()

~ -<: z => I l =>

i g I "' / ..J ~ w 

w ~ !- Q

j! Vl

-\;=-~ w ..J

i J"' 

..J 

~ .< ~ ~ 1) ~1 z ·- ;;;; r..i

~ g .., z ~~ ~ ~ 

, ::',:I! r..i ..J () . 

~~ "7 

Vl

.... : i 

5 "'"'" ::; ~~~ QQ 

;-?-t-/"1 vS'

~~ 

co -- co 

.

_,.=.. mi

::.~ I - · .. -· I

. --- ' 

. I I ~ .­~ -~~ 

V"I - -

. .. ·!I 

~,~= OXl:i I 

f( 
 . 

-
 ... 

.. -

" I

- . 

I ··1 / ..... 

.,- / 

I ' .. I .r::: -~ !! I ::r 

~~ 

(,) 

~7 ---iJ u °:' ~i 1 1 ~ I h \ I '" I 

: \/~ / :ji . ' ..... ., / / '- :;' 

,ff! 

~=-

0 ~·~ ~ 

S' [ 

~~ - . . --· ... ~l 

i ~ Il_ ~ ~ i r. ; !;. ~!H~ f. ;Jpi H ~ ~~. u " - ;:~ ... ~ 

~ ~ I 0

~ -: !! I 

~ 

I :,1'j / ­ / ­' I 


~ I 


- -i : ::11 

flfl r ----­ ~~ .J_ ~ "' :, 

": 

~ 1 

--­

~ ~; 

( ( ' -,d' ' 

·1 ~ . hi~i I.• ¥!

I m ~ ~!p~ };; 

;

;1~~; "" ... u :~ 

~ 

· ·--·-·-···············-············ ····· ·········-·-·---- ··-- · · ·-···-·-·---··· ··· ··· ···· --·-·--·-· ·· ····· ··-·-····· 

Figure 2.3 Details of the BMS2-TL3 SINGLE STEEL GUARDRAIL 

Report Code: 0109-131031/01_ENG Page 19of115

This report may oot be reproduced otherthan in lun, except with the prior wr~ten approval ol Cidaut Foundation. 

­

­

­

­
c1daut • Fnund•hon 

-==.=. 

XavierC, LLC

BMS2-TL3 SINGLE STEEL GUARDRAIL 

Test Report 0109-131031/01_ENG Date: ,1r.r1 1lld1 m'l'1 02/ 26 / 2014 Test Level TL-3 / MASH:2Q09 

. " 

., 

Figure 2.2 Details of theBMS2-TL3 SINGLE STEEL GUARDRAIL 

Report Code: 0109-131031 / 01 _ENG Page 1801115 


This report may nol be reproduced oUier than in ful,except with the prior written approval of Cida.ut Foundati:ln. F·flS 


r 
cida"irt • XavierC, LLC

r • BMS2-Tl3 SINGLE STEEL GUARDRAIL

Test Report 0109·131031 /01_ENG 02126/ 2014 Test Level TL·3 I MASH:2009 

' 

., f ,t·

.

: , . :1

(. ~ .. ·'·:_:i ; 

<~ 

i i - I ·.

.. 

: :.1 ' 

i: I 

.. I ., ,. -··-·· ·i-i I '· 

-··-:

·. 

t, 

u ·· I· :-. : --j­

~ --, ~ 

z :;; ' •' 

~ 0 ili ... --.' >= + '.5 

...J 0 i. § --' ' 5 ~ ~ 0 <I) Cl >­ ..

~ ~ ---1 '.5 I

t; 
 § 
 ·. , <I)


f­ w 

";­ ~ ·- <I)

-i 0

J: t Cl.

<I) ~ Q ~ '.

I ' ~ u g : ~ !' . <IJ 

I 

U ·--·' 

Figure 2.1Details of the BMS2-TL3SINGLE STEEL GUARDRAIL 

Report Code: 0109-131031 / 01 _ENG Page 17of115 

This report may not be reproduced other than in ful, except h the prior written approval of Cidaut Foondation. 
C "ida~'ut''~"---£:_. • .............__......__________________________________________........ av~ie.r c 

BMS2-Tl3 SINGLE STEEL GUARDRAIL 

Test Repon 02 / 2612014 Test level TL·3 I MASH:2009 

<J1~ 

.J 

I 

I 

+-----i 

I 

tlPi'CT PATH E>:Jf Pf-TH -~l

Gtntral lnfonn1tlon Post-Impact TraJKloty 

TestA;itn<y .....- ..................... CIDAtlT R03d lnfras!J\J<lu19 labo<alcry e2.en>nt Stow ing Distance ................. 128.0 fl Wwmtrum 

T~ Sta.nd1fd Test Ne.··- --·.. ·--.. MASHTnl 3·11 25A de~eos o.o nt~ 1r»Me !act 

Tasi No.•.•.•...- ........................ Ell-'.!032 15.5 nupslreamcl post Vthlc:ltStabiUty 


feM Oete (nvn~C!·yyy) ..... ..... ..... 12-J0.2013 17 L~att.1.lm YrrrN Ang'8 ..........., ·-··-·- 35 degrees 


Test Artlcl1 Exit CondltJon1 "1xilrom Plclt Angle .... ·11 doglffl 

Type ................ ................... lorq.tlJdinal barrio< S;>eed ..................................... .. 39.9 mw'h Maxm.m Roi "'9~ .................... -16 degrees 

Narnt •..••.••...•..•.••.- .............. at.\Sz.TL3SINGLE STEEL GU/\RORAl Ang~ ............................................ 4.3degrees Vtl>de Sn'19ng ............................ . No 

lnsta11:0i\ l enQtll .............._....• 18Sft!"'"'""""""""'I Ei~ BOA. cril!l'Or\......-·- -··· PASS 'lehide Pocketil\g ·············-·-·--·-··· No 

1terWor Key Elemen!s .••....•.... W-beam 5500~. 2.67mm lhk:\nCS! Occup.1nt RtskValuu 

C- 2~ S:eelpost SmJR. 4.5 nm1 lhi::ktleH lmpaa Vobcity Tt it Artklt Otfltctlon1 

1~-· PoSthengibleboltjc lt LOtlQ11>d•nal ......................... 15.lf\/s O)!lanlc ............................. '.OS ft 

Soi laltral .......... ·15.llV• Pe1maMnt ...-...•...... 2.&0ft 
 Soi type ar.d coodfon ........ Stand>rd soi, diy R!Otdown A.cce1erat:C/\! w..~ngWidti .................................. 4.75ft 


Typt of soi.. Gmd"9 B-AASHTOM147-65t2004) LOAifl11d l11al ........................... ·5.4G Vthlc ltdamtge 


O..C•;ption ofPfooom... ......... . 64nch ,~.'"''pod wih <0"1'il<>l< lateral ................................ .. 7.6 G VOS ................................................ 11F'L2 


TnfVoh ~ THIV ................................................ 12.1 km.oh CDC ............................................. .. 11flEW1 


Typol0<1lgnal"'1 ...................... 2270? PKO ...................................... 7.SG Mn. Ex1erl)r 061ourot.ron ....... 11.93'1cMs 


Make and Mod~ ·---·--·--·-·--.. 2C08 Dodi!< Ram 1500 ASI .............................. 0.68 OCDI ................. ........................ LFOOOOOOO 


Curt! .......................................... io111> Mu.0.05().sA•~ lr.1ax. O:cupant C<lmpa!'\melil 


Te~ lne.rt'al ............... - ....•.•.••. 5C021b Long;llldNI...................... -4.JG Oe'OflTlotlbn ···-·- ......................... 0.55inci'les 


0.mmy ..- .............................,, No dummy Llle<nl ..... ............................... 6.0 G 


GrolsSta'.ic ...... ........................ 5001 1b Vella!...................................... ·2.2G 


Figure 5.9 Summary of Resull for MASH Test 3-11 on BMS2-TL3 SINGLE STEELGUARDRAIL 

Report Code: 0109-131031 / 0l_ENG Page 40 of 115

TJ\is repon. m1yno1be reproducod other th.II\ Li ful , except wrth Ole :iri::::rwtf:Wlnappco.,.,. of Cidaut Fouodalion. 
c1

. da"'""ut'"••.-L:.- .....--. ----------------------------------•X8a...v8ie.. L

8

L•C sMs2-TL3 SINGLE STEEL GUARDRA rc..,•• IL 

Tosi R090rt 0109-131031101_ENG 02 J2612014 THllCYel Tl-3 JMASH:2009 

I/ 

· ·-· ·· ~ 01n1nil lnformatJon Impact condiOons Po•t·lmpict T'1Jtc lory 

Tes!Agtncy .......-..·­·-·-·-.......... CIOAUTRoad ln ..1n>du,. l tbo<ll""1 Spet<I ........................... ... . 62.5milll Stop;ilng Ois!or.ct ............. 282.8 nCownst'u m Test Standard Tut No...........--·· l.lASHTntS-10 2~ 5 doogrees 32.a ft IW!l ll'Olffcf1et 

Test No... ......­ .. ........ ........ El<·OOOI """" ··-····-···-··--······· loc.ati MOrienbllon.... ..-... 10.3 ft ups1ream ol post VehlcltStabl1lt)' 

Tes! Date {mm-dd·ml ··-···-····-··· 01-06-2014 17 i.•axinum Yaw Angle -····­·····-·-···-·­ 351!eg11u Tn1Artlclt E11t Conditions M.,i<oomPed> An~ ···-··-· ··· ···- .. -2degType .......................... ................. longl udinal barrier Sptt<I ................ .......... ........ 35.1mVh Mo.<;,,,.,mRoi fWilo ··--·-······-········· 10d~IMS 

Name ...... ............. ................... BMS2-Tl3SINGLESTEEL GUARDRAIL Anglo ..................................... ........... ... 10.0 degcees Vel\idt Snawng ................ o 

n:s ~la1ion el'll)tl\ ............. ... ... .... liaftl·Ml!l<M1omi~ols ) €1.it Boxet erOn........... ?ASS Vetu:::ta Poell.eting·· ····· ··· -·-·-·-· ~o 

Lta!efialorKeyEJemerr-.s ............. . W-beam S!>OOMC, 2.67mm thickness Occupant Rilk VaJuu 

C-125 ..1]I0$1S235JR. 4.5 mm l~ie< nm lmpoaVeloc!ty T11t Ar11clt Dtfltctlon1 

W-beam ­ post frangibk bat joitlt Long ud nal .... 22.0M Dynamic ..• 3.1H 

Soll Laterol ..•. -16.1 It/• Pem\ilnent ............. . 2.42ft Sol type Md condl:~n ......... . Slal<lonhol coy Riltd0¥>~ Acc.lera:km orti~Width ..................,.._ 3.93ft 

Typeolsoi . . ............................ Gradi>g B-MS,TOM 147-6512004) lol'l!)itudf\al.____,................... -6.9G Vth!clt dlm1;t 

Oo3en~tia al rr..,'11 .... ,......... 6-l~l~lampod~hco jl~ot LD11ral ......... .......... . ............_., a.JG VOS ................................. .................. 11FL4 

T11tV1hlclt 261 kon.'11 CDC ........................................ ...... THIV ····-·····­-····-···­·········-···············­ 1ILFEW2 

Type.!lo"9iillon ·­···-·-·­-······-·· llOOC PHO ............... ..... ....... ..... ... .................. \0.20 Max . Exte~ Oe!Ofmal ion ................ 6.97 ~che• 

~1ake a.nd Model .......................... 2008 Kia Rio S-e dan 0.76 AS1·····-·-···-··············-·········-····­-·· ···· OCDI ......................................... ... LF000 \000 CIJ1b ..................... ................ ... .. ..... 1:l761b MAJ.. O.OSO-s Ave1age Ltu. 0:..'"Upanl Campa:tmeril re~ rtal _.......................... --· 24341b Longi1u<nal ................................ .... -6.5G Oefcnnst bo ....... .... ......... .............. 1.6'li.t'lc.Ms 

Dummy-···-·-·----·····..···-··-·-·· 11 21b Liiler~· ···- ·· ···-· ·· ···· ·· · ··-·-- · -·- · !.6G GtOiSSStalic ................................. 26061b Vortbl .............................................. ·3.1G 

Figure 6.10 Summary of Result for MASH Test 3-10 on BMS2-TL3 SINGLE STEEL GUARDRAIL 

Report Code: 010~1310311 01 EN G Page 55 of 115 

it\is l~l)Olt may nol beMPl'Qdueed other I.Mnri ful, oxcepl wth ltleprior wrtlen approval ofCidaut Foundati:Jn.