U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration 

December 21, 2020 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

In Reply Refer To: 

HSST-1/B-353 

Mr. Bret R. Eckert 

Trinity Highway Products, LLC. 

3617 Cincinnati Avenue 

Rocklin, CA 95765 

USA 

Dear Mr. Eckert: 

This letter is in response to your November 12, 2020 request for the Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA) to review a roadside safety device, hardware, or system for eligibility 

for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program. This FHWA letter of eligibility is 

assigned FHWA control number B-353 and is valid until a subsequent letter is issued by FHWA 

that expressly references this device. 

Decision 

The following device is eligible within the length-of-need, with details provided in the form 

which is attached as an integral part of this letter: 

• 12-inch King MASH16 Composite Block on 31" MGS

Scope of this Letter 

To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding, new roadside safety devices should meet the crash 

test and evaluation criteria contained in the American Association of State Highway and 

Transportation Officials’(AASHTO) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). 

However, the FHWA, the Department of Transportation, and the United States Government do 

not regulate the manufacture of roadside safety devices. Eligibility for reimbursement under the 

Federal-aid highway program does not establish approval, certification or endorsement of the 

device for any particular purpose or use. 

This letter is not a determination by the FHWA, the Department of Transportation, or the United 

States Government that a vehicle crash involving the device will result in any particular 

outcome, nor is it a guarantee of the in-service performance of this device. Proper 

manufacturing, installation, and maintenance are required in order for this device to function as 

tested. 

This finding of eligibility is limited to the crashworthiness of the system and does not cover other 

structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 

Eligibility for Reimbursement 

Based solely on a review of crash test results and certifications submitted by the manufacturer, 

and the crash test laboratory, FHWA agrees that the device described herein meets the crash test 

and evaluation criteria of the AASHTO’s MASH. Therefore, the device is eligible for 

reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program if installed under the range of tested 

conditions. 

Name of system: 12-inch King MASH16 Composite Block on 31" MGS 

Type of system: Longitudinal Barrier 

Test Level: TL3 

Testing conducted by: Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) 

Date of request: November 12, 2020 

FHWA concurs with the recommendation of the accredited crash testing laboratory on the 

attached form. 

Full Description of the Eligible Device 

The device and supporting documentation, including reports of the crash tests or other testing 

done, videos of any crash testing, and/or drawings of the device, are described in the attached 

form. 

Notice 

This eligibility letter is issued for the subject device as tested. Modifications made to the device 

are not covered by this letter. Any modifications to this device should be submitted to the user 

(i.e., state DOT) as per their requirements. 

You are expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design, installation and 

maintenance requirements to ensure proper performance. 

You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the same chemistry, 

mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for review, and that it will meet the test 

and evaluation criteria of AASHTO’s MASH.

Issuance of this letter does not convey property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege. This 

letter is based on the premise that information and reports submitted by you are accurate and 

correct. We reserve the right to modify or revoke this letter if: (1) there are any inaccuracies in 

the information submitted in support of your request for this letter, (2) the qualification testing 

was flawed, (3) in-service performance or other information reveals safety problems, (4) the 

system is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, or (5) any other 

information indicates that the letter was issued in error or otherwise does not reflect full and 

complete information about the crashworthiness of the system. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 

Standard Provisions 

• To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of eligibility designated as FHWA 

control number B-353 shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test 

documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and 

documentation may be reviewed upon request. 

• This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, 

manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder. 

• This FHWA eligibility letter is not an expression of any Agency view, position, or 

determination of validity, scope, or ownership of any intellectual property rights to a 

specific device or design. Further, this letter does not impute any distribution or licensing 

rights to the requester. This FHWA eligibility letter determination is made based solely 

on the crash-testing information submitted by the requester. The FHWA reserves the 

right to review and revoke an earlier eligibility determination after receipt of subsequent 

information related to crash testing. 

Sincerely, 

Michael S. Griffith 

Director, Office of Safety Technologies 

Office of Safety 

Enclosures 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 1 of 5 

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility 

of Highway Safety Hardware 

Submitter 

Date of Request: November 12, 2020 New Resubmission 

Name: Bret R.Eckert, P.E. 

Company: Trinity Highway Products, LLC. 

Address: 3617 Cincinnati Avenue, Rocklin,California 95765 

Country: USA 

To: Michael S. Griffith, Director 

FHWA, Office of Safety Technologies 

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid 

highway program. 

Device & Testing Criterion - Enter from right to left starting with Test L 

System Type Submission Type Device Name / Variant Testing Criterion Test 

Level 

'B':Rigid/Semi-Rigid Barriers 

(Roadside, Median, Bridge 

Railings) 

PhysicalCrashTesting 

Engineering Analysis 

12-inch King MASH16 

Composite Block on 31" 

MGS 

AASHTO MASH TL3 

! - ! - !

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I  ('

I 

I I I I 

evel ! - ! - ! 

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration, I certify 

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety 

Hardware and that the evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH. 

Individual or Organization responsible for the product: 

Contact Name: Gregory A. Neece Same asSubmitter 

Company Name: Trinity Highway Products, LLC. Same asSubmitter 

Address: 2525 N. Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75207 Same asSubmitter 

Country: USA Same asSubmitter 

Enter below all disclosures of financial interests as required by the FHWA `Federal-Aid Reimbursement 

Eligibility Process for Safety Hardware Devices' document. 

TexasA&MTransportation Institute(“TTI”)wascontracted byTrinityHighwayProducts,LLC.(“THP”)to perform 

full-scalecrash testing of theKESS Corporation's(“KESS”)12-inchKing MASH16CompositeBlock on the 31-inch 

Midwest Guardrail System ("MGS"). The 12" King MASH16 Composite Block was designed and developed by 

KESS,and it isthecommercial embodiment of intellectual property that isowned byKESS. Thereare noshared 

financial interests in the 12-inch King MASH16 Composite Block on 31" MGSbetween KESS and TTI. Neither 

KESSnorTHPpay royalties to theTexasA&MUniversitySystem ("TAMUS",of whichTTIis a member agency),for 

direct salesof the 12"King MASH16CompositeBlock. However,THPdoespay royaltiesto TAMUS (and thusTTI) 

in connection with salesof certain other proprietary productsandsystems,someof which usecompositeblocks 

and may include the 12" King MASH16 Composite Block in the future. The fees paid by THP to TTI, an 

internationally accredited third party crash testing laboratory, to conduct full-scale crash testing, analyze, and 

report the test results of the 12" King MASH16 Composite Block were not dependent or contingent on the 

resultsof the testing. 
 

 

 

 

 

I 

  ('

 I

Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 2 of 5 

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 

A brief description of each crash test and its result: 

NewHardware or Modification to 

Significant Modification Existing Hardware 

The test installation consisted of 162.5 ft of 12-gauge W-beam guardrail sections supported by 6-ft long 

W6×8.5steel posts, with aTxDOT Downstream AnchorTerminal (DAT)on each end,for a total length of 181.25 

ft. The top of the W-beam guardrail was located 31 inches above grade, and the posts were spaced at 75 

inches. W-beam guardrail splices were located mid-span between posts. All steel was galvanized per ASTM 

International (ASTM)A123or ASTMA153 specification.Therailswere held off the postsin the length of need 

with 12-inch King MASH16 composite blockouts and secured with 14-inch guardrail bolts and nuts. The 

guardrail postswereembedded 40 inches.Thesupplied 12-inchKing MASH16composite blockswere formed 

using 99%recycled high-density polyethylene(HDPE)- blowing agent. The12-inchKing MASH16 Composite 

Blocks areanalternatechoice to be used in conjunction with the 31-inch Midwest GuardrailSystem ("MGS"). 

CRASH TESTING 

Bysignature below, theEngineeraffiliated with the testing laboratory,agreesin support of thissubmission that 

all of the critical and relevant crash tests for this device listed above were conducted to meet the MASHtest 

criteria. The Engineer has determined that no other crash tests are necessary to determine the device meets 

theMASHcriteria. 

Engineer Name: D. Lance Bullard, Jr. P.E. 

EngineerSignature: D.LanceBullard,Jr. Digitally signed by D.LanceBullard,Jr. 

Date: 2020.11.02 18:51:21 -06'00' 

Address: 3100 SH 47, Bldg 7091, Bryan, Texas 77807 TTI, TAMU 3135, College Station, TX 77843-3135 Same asSubmitter 

Country: USA Same asSubmitter 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 3 of 5 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description 

Evaluation 

Results 

3-10 (1100C) 

Test 3-10 involves an 1100C vehicle 

impacting the test article at a target impact 

speed of 62mi/h and target angle of 25°. 

The target CIPfor the right corner of the 

front bumper was8.5ft upstream of the 

centerline of Post #12. 

The results of the test conducted on 

September 7, 2020 are found in TTI Test 

Report No.690900-KES4-5.The test vehicle 

was traveling at a speed of 63.4 mi/h as it 

made contact with the 31-inch MGS 

Guardrail with 12-inch King MASH16 

Composite Blocks 8.2 ft upstream of the 

centerline of Post #12 and at an impact 

angle of 24.6°.After lossof contact with the 

barrier, the vehicle came to rest 97 ft 

downstream of the impact point and 14 ft 

toward the trafficside. 

The 31-inch MGS Guardrail with 12-inch 

King MASH16CompositeBlockscontained 

and redirected the 1100C vehicle. The 

vehicle did not penetrate, underride, or 

override the installation.Thevehicleexited 

within theexit box criteriadefined in MASH. 

Maximum dynamic deflection of the rail 

during the test was 29.5 inches. Maximum 

permanent deformation was16.0inches. 

Working width was43.0inches,and height 

of working width was6.7inches. 

The 1100C vehicle remained upright during 

and after the collision event. Maximum roll 

and pitch angles were 13° and 7°, 

respectively. 

LongitudinalOIVwas19.0ft/sand lateral 

OIVwas18.0ft/s. 

Maximum longitudinal occupant ridedown 

acceleration was 10.9 g, and maximum 

lateral occupant ridedown acceleration was 

11.1 g. Occupant risk factors were within 

the preferred limits specified in MASH. 

Maximum exterior crush to the vehicle was 

7 inches in the side plane at the right front 

corner at bumper height. Maximum 

occupant compartment deformation was 

0.5 inch in the right kick panel area. 

The 31-inch MGS Guardrail with 12-inch 

King MASH16 Composite Blocks performed 

acceptably for MASHtest 3-10. 

PASS 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 4 of 5 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description 

Evaluation 

Results 

3-11 (2270P) 

Test 3-11 involves a 2270P vehicle 

impacting the test articleat a target impact 

speed of 62mi/h and target angle of 25°. 

The target CIPfor the right corner of the 

front bumper wasthe centerline of the face 

of post14. 

Theresultsof the test conducted onJuly 9, 

2020are found inTTITestReport No. 

690900-KES 4-5. The test vehicle was 

travelingat a speed of 61.9mi/h asit made 

contact with the 31-inch MGS Guardrail 

with 12-inch King MASH16 Composite 

Blocks 4.5 inches downstream of the 

centerline of Post #14 and at an impact 

angle of 25.1°.After lossof contact with the 

barrier, the vehicle came to rest 153 ft 

downstream of the impact point and 25 ft 

toward the field side. 

The 31-inch MGS Guardrail with 12-inch 

King MASH16CompositeBlockscontained 

and redirected the 2270P vehicle. The 

vehicle did not penetrate, underride, or 

override the installation. Thevehicleexited 

within theexit box criteriadefined in MASH. 

Maximum dynamic deflection during the 

test was 46.0 inches. Maximum permanent 

deformation was 36.4 inches. Working 

width was 69.2 inches, and the height of 

working width was 52.8 inches. 

The 2270P vehicle remained upright during 

and after the collision event. Maximum roll 

and pitch angles were 10° and 6°, 

respectively. 

LongitudinalOIVwas17.4ft/sand lateral 

OIVwas11.8ft/s. 

Maximum longitudinal occupant ridedown 

acceleration was5.5g and maximum lateral 

occupant ridedown acceleration was 6.7 g. 

Occupant risk factors were within the 

preferred limits specified in MASH. 

Maximum exterior crush to the vehicle was 

10.0 inches in the side plane at the right 

front corner at bumper height. Maximum 

occupant compartment deformation was 

2.0inchesin the right front firewall/floor 

pan area. 

The 31-inch MGS Guardrail with 12-inch 

King MASH16 Composite Blocks performed 

acceptably for MASHtest 3-11. 

PASS 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ 

□ 

□ 

Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 5 of 5 

3-20 (1100C) This product is not a transition system. Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

3-21 (2270P) This product is not a transition system. Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test 

laboratory (cite the laboratory’s accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports.):

Laboratory Name: Texas A&M Transportation Institute 

LaboratorySignature: Digitally signed by Darrell L. Kuhn 

'Date: 2020.11.11 11:10:40-06'00 

Address: 

3100 SH 47, Bldg 7091, Bryan, Texas 77807 

TTI, TAMU 3135, 

College Station, TX 77843-3135 

Same asSubmitter 

Country: USA Same asSubmitter 

Accreditation Certificate 

Number and Dates of current 

Accreditation period : 

ISO17025-2017 Laboratory 

A2LACertificateNumber: 2821.01 

ValidTo:April 30,2021 

Digitally signed by Bret Eckert, P.E. 

DN:cn=BretEckert,P.E.,o,ou=Trinity Submitter Signature*:Bret Eckert, P.E. Highway Products, 

email=bret.eckert@trin.net, c=US 

Date: 2020.11.12 07:40:55 -08'00' 

ATTACHMENTS 

Attach to this form: 

1) Additional disclosures of related financial interest as indicated above. 

2) A copy of the full test report, video, and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in 

support of this request. 

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications 

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards]. For proprietary products, a single isometric line drawing is 

usually acceptable to illustrate the product, with detailed specifications, intended use, and contact 

information provided on the reverse. Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that 

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted 

to facilitate our review. 

FHWA Official Business Only: 

Eligibility Letter 

Number Date Key Words 
- -----97'-----o,f 

Heading Angle 14---tl"l--- 21.0 '

Exit An gle 8.2' ---,,.w..,.~1..,.., 0,,.....,........ 

t;a-•,a" ..W:411(; 

C(fl'\l,)H~Okl:t ~ -)-, lmpactAngle 

Imp act Path '-J 

14' 

General lnfonnation 

Test Agency ....................... Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) 

Test Standard Test No ....... MASH-2016Test 3-10 

TTI Test No . ...................... 

Test Date ............ .... ........ ... 

Test Article 

Type .................................. 

Name ................................. 

Installation Length .............. 

Material or Key Elements ... 

Soil Type and Condition .... 

Test ve·hicle 

Type/Designation ............... 

N Make and Model ................ 

690900-KES5 

2020-09-07 

Longitudinal Banier-Blockout 

12-inch King MASH16 Composrte Block 

on Midwest Guardrail System 

181 ft 3 inches 

MGS guardrail system, top of W-beam 

31 inches above grade on Std 72-inch 

long wide-ftange guardrail pos1s, with 

12-inch ,King MASH16 composite 

blockouts 

MSHTO M147-65, grading B soil 

(crushed limestone), damp 

11 OOC 

2014 Nissan Versa 

0 Curb ................................... 2411 lb 

N Test Inertial ........................ 2416 lb 0 

' Dummy.............................. 165 lb 

0 Gross Static ............ ........ ... 2581 lb 

0' 

Impact Conditions 

Speed ............................... 63.4 milh 

Angle ................................. 24.6° 

Location/Orientation ........... 8.2 ft upstream of 

post 12 

Impact Severity.................... 56 kip-ft 

Exit Conditions 

Speed ................................ 30.7 milh 

Trajectory/Heading Angle ... 17.5°/13.0° 

Occupant Risk Values 

Longitudinal OIV ................ 19.0 ft/s 

Lateral OIY ......................... 18.0 ft/s 

Longitudinal Ridedown ....... 10.9 g 

Lateral Ridedown ............... 11.1 g 

THIV .................................. 9.0 mis 

ASl ..................................... 0.8 

Max. 0.050-s Average 

Longitudinal .................... - 7:8 g 

Lateral...... .. ........... - 6.3 g 

Vertical.. .......................... .2.2 g 

Post-Impact Trajectory 

Stopping Distance ..................... 97 ft do'Mlstream 

14 ft twd traffic lanes 

Vehicle Stability 

Maximum Yaw Angle ................ 53• 

Maximum Pitch Angle ............... 7° 

Maximum Roll Angle ................. 13° 

Vehicle Snagging ...................... Yes 

Vehicle Pocketing No 

Test Article Deflections 

Dynamic .................................... 29.5 inches 

Permanent................................ 16.0 inches 

WOll(ing Width ........................... 43.0 inches 

Height of Wor1<ing Width ........... 6.7 inches 

Vehicle Damage 

VOS .......................................... 01RF05 

CDC .......................................... 01FREW3 

Max. Exterior Deformation......... 7.0 inches 

OCDI ......................................... FR0010000 

Max. Occupant Compartment 

Deformation ........................... 0.5 inch 

oe Figul'e 5.7. Summa1·y of Results fo1·MASH-2016 Test 3-10 on 12-inch King 1'1ASH16 Composite Block on 1'1

IGS. 
0.000 s 0. 100s 0.200 s 

,s3• ---l-..--l•:11-11 30 9• 

Exll Angle I• 0 4' downstream from 

"U centerline of post ,, ,, -~ ·,,, ,, , , , , , , , , , , , l 

~"""' ~ ~ - I - - __, '....___ Impact Anglo 

Exit Angle Box __/' , J 

Heading Angle Impact Path 

0.300 s 

~w.....n..11~ 

c....,n:1,~~PIJ~ 

12'I<;,; l"°'9116 ¢0......~« llh(k 

N General lnfonnation 

00 Test Agency........... 

Test Standard Test No . ...... 

TTI Test No . ...................... 

Test Date ............ .... ........... 

Test Article 

Type .................................. 

Name................................. 

Installation Length .............. 

Material or Key Elements ... 

Soil Type and Condition ..... 

Test Vehicle 

Type/Designation .............. 

Make and Model ................ 

Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) 

MASH-2016Test 3-11 

690900-KES4 

2020-07-09 

Longitudinal Barrier-Blockout 

12-inch King MASH16 Composrte Block 

on Midwest Guardrail System 

181 ft 3 inches 

MGS guardrail system, top ofW-beam 

31 inches above grade on Std 72-inch 

long wide-flange guardrail posts, 'Mlh 

12-inch King MASH16 composite 

blockouts 

AASHTO M147-65, grading 8 soil 

(crushed limestone), dry 

2270P 

201 4 RAM 1500 Pickup 

N Curb ................................... 4955 lb 

0 Test Inertial........................ 501 5 lb N 

0 Dummy.............................. No dummy

' Gross Static ....................... 5015 lb 

Impact Conditions 

Speed ......... .. .... 61.9 mi/h 

Angle ................... .. .... 25.1 • 

Location/Orientation .......... 4.5 inches dwnstrm of 

post 14 

Impact Severity................... 116 kip-ft 

Exit Conditions 

Speed ................................ 34.5 milh 

Trajectory/Heading Angle ... 20.6°/23.8° 

Occupant Risk Values 

Longitudinal OIV ................ 17.4 ft/s 

Lateral OIV ......................... 11.8 ft/s 

Longitudinal Ridedown ....... 5.5 g 

Lateral Ridedown ............... 6.7 g 

THIV .................................. 7.1 m/s 

ASl ..................................... 0.7 

Max. 0.050-s Average 

Longitudinal ...... .. ...... - 6.5 g 

Lateral...... .. ........ - 4.6 g 

Vertical..................... ...... - 4.2 g 

Post-Impact Traject ory 

Stopping Distance .......... .. 

Vehicle Stability 

Maximum Y.m Angle ..... 

Maximum Pitch Angle.... 

153 ft downstream 

25 ft twd field side 

47° 

6° 

Maximum Roll Angle ............... 10· 

Vehicle Snagging .................... Yes 

Vehicle Pocketing ................... No 

Test Article Deflections 

Dynamic........................... . 46.0 inches 

Pennanent..................... ... 36.4 inches 

W011<ing Width.................. 69.2 inches 

Height ofW011<ing Width ......... 52.8 inches 

Vehicle Damage 

VDS............................. . 01RF05 

CDC ............................ . 01 FREW4 

Max. Exterior Deformation ...... 10.0 inches 

OCDI ...................................... FR0010000 

Max. Occupant Compartment 

Defonnation ......................... 2.0 inches 

0 

0' Figure 6.8. Summary ofResults for NlASH-1016 Test 3-11 on 12-inch King MASH16 Composite Block

00 Oil MGS. 
Test Installation r 181'-3" 

~75"Typ 

c.m::::=lt .a:::::

Plan View 

Laog• 162' of 6" Need "I fl IDATIT'.p lea chi •:d I . I ' I . I ' I . I ' I . I • I I " I . I .f" I ' I . I ' I . ~] I ' 

4-space W-beam Guardrail 

G~. 

, 31" 

L 

12" King MASH16 

Composite Block 

I 

i i 

I I 

i i 

I I 

i i 

I I I I 

14" Guard rail Bolt 

72" Wide-Flange 

Guardrail Post 

Ground Line 

Section A-A 

Sea le 1 : 20 

Typ ica I in Length of Need 

Elevation View 

12" l<in g MASH1 G 

Compo site Block 

1-1/4" Guardrail Bolt 

Typical x8 at each Railjoint 

Detail B 

Scale1 10 

F

1a. Backfill Post holes with Type A grade 2 crushed lime

road base, compacted to MASH standard. 

1b. Recessed Guardrail Nuts on all Button-he ad Guardr1c. All steel products shall be fabricated in accordance w

ASTM A6 specifications and tolerances. 

Texas

A

&M Roadside Safety 

:-.II Tram;portaUon Physical Security Div

fnstitute Proving Ground 

Project#690900-KE~ 5 King Blockouts Guardrail I 

Drawn by G ESNVS Scale 1 :250 Sheet 1 of 1 Test Instal

TR No. 690900-KES4&5 35 2020-10-08
1 

2 r (57 MM) 

t (29 MM) 

n 

~

,,, 14 Ill 

(357 MM) 

0f' (2x) 

19 MM) 

7 11 

(292 MM) 

r 

Patent number, Logo & Recycle symbol 

displayed in this location 

- 7 

\ _J. 

I : : I ( 10\ ·~Ml 

Notes, 

1. Material ; HOPE 99% reg ri nd/blowing agen 

i~D FINISH 

1 % block co lor concentrate

REMMflASH 

P-S NECESSARY DO NOT SCALE 

DRAWN 

CHK'D 

I NAME I s1GNATURE I I TITLE 12'' Ki

Fo r Ma

APWD DRAWING NAME 

Mffi 

DATE 04/01/20 

TR No. 690900-KES4&5 36 2020-10-08