alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM BALANCE SHEET STATEMENT OF INCOME AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,793
<SECURITIES>                                     1,599
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                        50
<INVENTORY>                                      8,182
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,726
<PP&E>                                          32,938
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,724
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,073
<SALES>                                        158,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,780
<CGS>                                          137,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (186)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,719
<INCOME-TAX>                                       600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,119
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,119
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RONALD G. DANDAR, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 08-60 Erie

v. )

)

MARK KRYSEVIG et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on

February 25, 2008 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [130], filed on May 27,

2010, recommends that the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied and that

no certificate of appealability issue. The parties were granted ten (10) days in which to

file objections. Petitioner was served by certified mail at SCI-Cresson, where he is

presently incarcerated. On June 1, 2010, he filed two documents which are largely

incomprehensible and which have been entered on the Court’s docket as Petitioner’s

Statement Invoking Homeland Security Act, National Security Act and Patriot Act [131]

and Addendum [132]. Petitioner also filed a document entered as an appeal [133] of

the Magistrate Judge’s June 1, 2010 text order which denied Petitioner’s motions to

appoint an expert and for other miscellaneous relief.

After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and Petitioner’s various filings in

response thereto, the following order is entered:

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:08-cv-00060-SJM-SPB Document 134 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 2
AND NOW, this 21 day of June, 2010;

st

IT IS ORDERED that the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus be, and

hereby is, DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Inasmuch as jurists of reason would not find it debatable whether the

Court lacks jurisdiction over the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus, IT IS

FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue.

The Report and Recommendation [130] of Magistrate Judge Baxter dated

May 27, 2010 is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 /s Sean J. McLaughlin 

SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter 

Page 2 of 2

Case 1:08-cv-00060-SJM-SPB Document 134 Filed 06/21/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Thomas Willy HARRIS, Appellant, v. James S. MORROW, Appellee.

No. M-257.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Nov. 18, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27954]



[[Page 54858]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration


Working Group on Studying the Merits of Defined Contribution vs. 
Defined Benefit Plans, Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension 
Benefits Plans; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 
Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans Working 
Group established to Study the Merits of Defined Contribution vs. 
Defined Benefit Plans With an Emphasis on Small Business Concerns will 
hold a public meeting on November 12, 1997 in Conference Center C-5521, 
Seminar Room 4, U.S. Department of Labor Building, Second and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20210.
    The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 9:30 a.m. 
until approximately noon, is for Working Group members to finish its 
final report to the Council on the issue, particularly as to the 
formation of defined benefit plans for small businesses.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to the topic by submitting 20 copies on or before October 
30, 1997, to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory 
Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20210. Individuals or representatives of 
organizations wishing to address the Working Group on Studying the 
Merits of Defined Contribution vs. Defined Contribution Plans With an 
Emphasis on Small Business Concerns should forward their request to the 
Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations 
will be limited to 10 minutes, time permitting, but an extended written 
statement may be submitted for the record. Individuals with 
disabilities, who need special accommodations, should contact Sharon 
Morrissey by October 30, at the address indicated in this notice.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before October 30.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 15th day of October, 1997.
Olena Berg,
Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-27954 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
----

|   | · | Key      Technology Holdings USA LLC, an Oregon limited liability      company |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Suplusco      Holding B.V., a Netherlandscorporation |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Key      Technology B.V., a Netherlandscorporation |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Key      Technology Australia Pty Ltd. |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|

|   | · | Productos      Key Mexicana S. de R.L. de C.V. |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Key      Technology (Shanghai) Trading Co.Ltd. |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|

----
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

 Washington, D.C. 20590

March 10, 2011

FHWA:HSSI:NArtimovich:ms:x30272:3/7/11

File: h://directory folder/HSSI/ WZ299_Break-Away.docx

cc: HSSI Nick Artimovich 

In Reply Refer To:

HSST/WZ-299

Mr. Henry A. Ross

Director of Government Relations

Plasticade Products

7700 N. Austin Avenue

Skokie, Illinois 60077

Dear Mr. Ross:

This is in response to your October 8, 2010, letter requesting the Federal Highway 

Administration’s (FHWA) acceptance of your company’s Break-AwayTM Type III Barricade 

with lightweight warning lights as a crashworthy traffic control device for use in work zones and 

elsewhere on the National Highway System (NHS). Accompanying your letter was the FHWA 

Office of Safety Design form indicating successful performance when tested under the American 

Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Manual for Assessing 

Safety Hardware (MASH) Test 3-71 (modified).

You requested that we find the Break-AwayTM Type III Barricade with lightweight warning 

lights acceptable for use on the NHS under the provisions of the AASHTO MASH. Evaluation 

with the 1100C passenger car at low speed (Test 3-70), and the 2270P pickup-truck at high speed 

(3-72) are requirements under the MASH. Your request was accompanied by a 

January 17, 2010, letter from E-Tech Testing Services requesting a waiver of both MASH Tests 

3-70 and 3-72 because of the nature of the test articles and geometry of the vehicles. We concur 

in the waiver of these tests.

This letter is the acknowledgement of the FHWA’s acceptance of your request. The original 

completed form has been modified by the addition of the FHWA acceptance letter number and 

the date of our review. The form, of which a copy is enclosed for reference, will be posted on 

our Web site in the near future.

Sincerely yours,

Michael S. Griffith

Director, Office of Safety Technologies 

Office of Safety 

Enclosures
<PAGE>
						    Exhibit 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



To the Board of Directors
Micros-to-Mainframes, Inc.


We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (No. 333-72269) on Form S-8 of Micros-to-Mainframes, Inc. of
our report dated May 17, 2001 related to the consolidated balance sheets
of Micros-to-Mainframes, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2001 and 2000,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in
the March 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Micros-to-Mainframes,
Inc.




GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York

June 28, 2001
1 Subject: FW: for NOX docket: FW: 2011 EHP paper on air pollution and inflammation

Attachments: EHP paper data.doc

From: Zhu Tong [ mailto:tzhu@pku.edu.cn ]

Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:17 AM

To: Patel, Molini

Cc: Weiwei Lin

Subject: 答复 : 2011 EHP paper on air pollution and inflammation

Dear Dr. Patel,

Thanks for your interest in our paper. Attached file contains the information you requested.

Best Regards

Tong

Tong Zhu, Dr.

Professor, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering

Director, Centre for Environment and Health

Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Tel:+86

‐ 10

‐ 62754789 ; Fax:+86

‐ 10

‐ 62760755

http://cese.pku.edu.cn

发件人: Patel, Molini [ mailto:Patel.Molini@epa.gov ]

发送时间: 2013 年 7 月 16 日 5:19

收件人: tzhu@pku.edu.cn

主题: 2011 EHP paper on air pollution and inflammation



### Dear Dr. Zhu,

Our office is currently developing the Integrated Science Assessment for Nitrogen Oxides and reviewing your 2011 paper

in EHP, “Acute Respiratory Inflammation in Children and Black Carbon in Ambient Air before and during the 2008 Beijing

Olympics.” We are interested in the copollutant modeling results you presented in Fig ure 3. Would you please share

with us the quantitative results (effect estimates and 95% CIs) for the NO2

‐ eNO association adjusted for BC and PM2.5,

the BC

‐ eNO association adjusted for NO2, and the PM2.5

‐ eNO association adjusted for NO2. We also hope you would

provide the correlations among these pollutants. Than k you!

Best regards,

Molini M. Patel, PhD, MPH

Epide miologist

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

National Center for Environmental Assessment

Mailcode: B243

‐ 01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: 919.541.1492, Fax: 919.541.1818, Email: patel.molini@epa.govAcute Respiratory Inflammation in Children and Black Carbon in Ambient Air before and

during the 2008 Beijing Olympics

T

able 1. Single

- pollutant ├ and two

- pollutant ╞ models for percent change in eNO per IQR change in

pollutant of interest, using 0

- 24 hr average pollutant concentrations (mean and 95% confidence

interval). A ll estimates are adjusted for BMI, asthma, temperature, and RH

Table 2. Exposure correlation matrix (24

- hour average pollution levels)

P ollutant BC PM 2.5 NO 2

BC 1 .00 0.7 1 ** 0.6 8 **

PM 2.5 1 .00 0. 30 *

NO 2 1 .00

* p<0.05 ; ** p<0.001 from Wald

- based tests of Spearman correlation coefficients % change in eNO 95% CI

NO 2 ├ 11.0 9.2

- 12.7

NO2 with BC ╞ 2.9 0.2

- 5.6

NO 2 with PM 2.5 ╞ 7.3 4.9

- 9.8

BC ├ 16.6 14.1

- 19.2

BC with NO 2 ╞ 14.9 10.7

- 19.2

PM 2.5 ├ 18.7 15.0

- 22.5

PM 2.5 with NO 2 ╞ 12.2 7.4

- 17.1
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54006-54007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27513]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-210, RM-9166]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Soldiers Grove, WI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Lyle 
Robert Evans d/b/a Rural Radio Company proposing the allotment of 
Channel 290A to Soldiers Grove, Wisconsin, as that community's first 
local FM broadcast service. There is a site restriction 11.8 kilometers 
(7.3 miles) northeast of the community at coordinates 43-28-16 and 90-
40-21.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before November 24, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before December 9, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC. 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, as follows: Lyle Robert Evans, d/b/a Rural Radio 
Company,

[[Page 54007]]

1296, Marian Lane, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54304.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

Supplementary Information: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-210, adopted September 24, 
1997, and released October 3, 1997. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, 
NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-27513 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
```
259 La. 58

#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. David BRANDT.

No. 51445.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1971.

In re: State of Louisiana, through the Department of Highways applying for cer-tiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 246 So.2d 876.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
29–008 

113TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 113–240 

RELATING TO CONSIDERATION OF THE JOINT RESOLUTION (H.J. RES. 59) MAKING CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 368] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 368, by a record vote of 9 to 4, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides that the House insists on its amendment 

to the Senate amendment to H.J. Res. 59, the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014, and requests a conference with the Senate thereon. 

Section 2 of the resolution provides that any motion pursuant to 

clause 4 of rule XXII relating to H.J. Res. 59 may be offered only 

by the Majority Leader or his designee. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
2 

Rules Committee record vote No. 77 

Motion by Ms. Foxx to report the rule. Adopted: 9–4. 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Ms. Foxx ............................................................ Yea Ms. Slaughter .................................................. Nay 

Mr. Bishop of Utah .......................................... Yea Mr. McGovern ................................................... Nay 

Mr. Cole ............................................................ Yea Mr. Hastings of Florida ................................... Nay 

Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Yea Mr. Polis ........................................................... Nay 

Mr. Nugent ....................................................... Yea 

Mr. Webster ...................................................... Yea 

Ms. Ros-Lehtinen ............................................. Yea 

Mr. Burgess ...................................................... Yea 

Mr. Sessions, Chairman ................................... Yea 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 97-709 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SPACE COOPERATION 

Peaceful Uses 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and BRAZIL 

Signed at Brasilia March 1, 1996 

 with Annex 

and 

Agreements Extending the Agreement 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Brasilia February 21 and June 6, 2008 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Brasilia January 5 and 29, 2009 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Brasilia December 10, 2009 and January 5, 2010 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Brasilia February 3 and May 3, 2012 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 BRAZIL 

 Space Cooperation: Peaceful Uses 

Agreement signed at Brasilia March 1, 1996; 

Entered into force July 9, 1997. 

With annex. 

And agreements extending the agreement. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Brasilia 

 February 21 and June 6, 2008; 

Entered into force June 6, 2008. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Brasilia 

 January 5 and 29, 2009; 

Entered into force January 29, 2009. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Brasilia 

 December 10, 2009 and January 5, 2010; 

Entered into force January 5, 2010. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Brasilia 

 February 3 and May 3, 2012; 

Entered into force May 3, 2012.
#### Thomas NAILS, Appellant, v. Dolores WILLIAMSON and Ronnie Williamson, her husband, Appellees.

No. 69-746.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 14, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Parker Lee McDonald, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 2012 - Present

NC Crash Report Form Codesheet 2012,

NC Crash Report Form Instruction Manual 

2014

2. A injury type (disabling) A

Injury obviously serious enough to prevent the person injured from performing his normal 

activities for at least one day beyond the day of the collision. Massive loss of blood, broken 

bone, unconsciousness of more than momentary duration are examples.

(32) Injury Status codes & definitions found on 

Manual pg33-34.

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE STATE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 2012 - Present

NC Crash Report Form 2009,

NC DMV-349 Crash Report Form Instruction 

Manual 2014 and 2012

Pedestrian 3

Pedestrian - Any person not in or upon a motor vehicle or other road vehicle. 

Includes: Person afoot, sitting, lying, or working upon a land way or place; Person in or 

operating a pedestrian conveyance. Excludes: Person boarding or alighting from another 

conveyance, except pedestrian conveyance; Person jumping or falling from a motor vehicle in 

transport. 

22 Person Type code found on Manual pg30, 

definition found on Manual pg113

Roller skater, roller blader, etc. 5

Pedestrian Conveyance - A device, other than a transport device, used by a pedestrian for 

personal mobility assistance or recreation. These devices can be motorized or human 

powered, but not propelled by pedaling. Includes skateboards, roller skates, rollerblades, inline skates (rollerblades), scooters (foot-powered), wheelchairs, and strollers. 

22 Person Type code found on Manual pg30, 

definition found on Manual pg113

Pedalcyclist 2012 - Present

Pedalcyclist (bicyclist, tricycle, 

unicycle) 4

Pedalcyclist - A vehicle operated solely by pedals and propelled by human power. 

Includes: Bicycle (any size, with two wheels in tandem); Tricycle; Unicycle; Sidecar or trailer 

attached to any of the above devices; Excludes: These devices when towed by a motor 

vehicle, including hitching.

22 Person Type code found on Manual pg30, 

definition found on Manual pg113

North Carolina