Page 1 of 57

MICHIGAN

2021 ANNUAL REPORT

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Federal Highway Administration 

HIGHWAY SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 

Photo source: Federal Highway Administration
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 2 of 57

Table of Contents

Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................. 3

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence............................................................. 3

Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Structure................................................................................................................................. 5

Program Administration..................................................................................................................... 5

Program Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 9

Project Implementation .......................................................................................................................18

Funds Programmed.........................................................................................................................18

General Listing of Projects ..............................................................................................................20

Safety Performance ............................................................................................................................39

General Highway Safety Trends......................................................................................................39

Safety Performance Targets............................................................................................................45

Applicability of Special Rules...........................................................................................................47

Evaluation ...........................................................................................................................................48

Program Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................48

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements .......................................................49

Project Effectiveness.......................................................................................................................52

Compliance Assessment ....................................................................................................................53

Optional Attachments..........................................................................................................................56

Glossary..............................................................................................................................................57
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 3 of 57

Disclaimer 

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action 

for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, 

schedules, lists, or other data.

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action 

for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, 

schedules, lists, or other data.23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, 

surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning 

the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway

crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway

safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall

not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for

other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in 

such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.”
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 4 of 57

Executive Summary

The 2021 HSIP Annual Report for the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) will be for the one year 

time period of FY 2020 which commenced on October 1, 2019 and ended on September 30, 2020. This report 

addresses safety improvements funded through MDOT on both trunkline and non-trunkline roadways.
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 5 of 57

Introduction 

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of achieving 

a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 

924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP implementation 

and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the HSIP Reporting Guidance dated 

December 29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, progress in implementing highway safety 

improvement projects, progress in achieving safety outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the 

improvements and compliance assessment.

Program Structure

Program Administration

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

The general structure of the HSIP is to select cost-effective safety improvements, as identified in Michigan's 

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), to address locations with correctable fatality (K) and serious injury (A) 

crashes. Projects are selected and identified during the annual Call for Projects process for trunkline and nontrunkline roadways. The selected projects are designed and implemented via the Region offices and Local 

Agency Programs oversight. Before and After studies are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a 

particular countermeasure.

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Other-TSMO (Transportation Systems Management and Operations)

The HSIP Trunkline program is managed out of the MDOT Central Office in the Bureau of Field Services - 

TSMO Division - Traffic and Safety Section - Safety Programs/Pavement Markings.

The HSIP Local Agency Non-Trunkline Program is managed out of the MDOT Central office in the Bureau of 

Highway Development - Development Services Division - Local Agency Programs (Local Safety).

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

• Other-Central Office via Statewide Formula via MDOT Regions

• Other-Central Office via Statewide Competitive Application Process for Local Agencies

• Other-Central Office via Funding Set Aside

The Lansing Central Office manages a separate Call for Projects process for both Trunkline and Non-Trunkline 

roadways. There is also a funding set aside amount directly for Trunkline pavement

markings and delineation.

The Local Agency Call for Projects is a competitive application process between all of the Local Agencies of 

Michigan and cycles on a two-year call for projects.

The Statewide Trunkline Call for Projects has specific funding targets for each of the 7 MDOT Regions. The 

funding targets are calculated based on lane miles, traffic volumes, and Fatality and Serious Injuries that occur

within each Region. The State Trunkline Call for Projects cycles on a five-year call for projects platform.
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 6 of 57

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP.

For the local roadway network, HSIP funds (~$15.8 M) are administered by the Local Agency Programs Safety 

Engineer located in the Central Office. The HSIP funds were allocated to three separate Call for Projects: $6 M 

for High Risk Rural Roads (HRRR), $7.5 M for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and $1.5 M for 

Streamlined Systemic HSIP. Typically, only the construction phase is eligible for federal aid. Preliminary 

engineering costs were eligible for federal participation if it was for a project identified on the Transparency 

(5%) Report, by the Local Safety Initiative, in a Road Safety Audit (RSA) or in a traffic signal optimization 

project. Otherwise, preliminary engineering was not eligible for federal safety funds. Projects are federally 

funded at 80 or 90 percent up to an amount not to exceed $600,000 of Federal funding, with a 20 or 10 percent 

Local Agency match, respectively.

All Local Agencies within Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) areas must coordinate with their MPO to 

ensure inclusion of their project in the area’s Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). Those agencies that are 

part of a rural task force are to notify their members that they applied for these funds. Rural task force approval 

is not necessary. MDOT Local Agency Programs (LAP) coordinates with MDOT Planning to ensure these 

projects are included in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP).

The planning and selection of projects for the local roadway system is very similar to that of the state trunkline. 

Local agencies were invited by a May 7, 2018 memorandum to submit proposed projects for consideration as 

part of an annual Call for Projects (CFP). All local agencies (counties, cities, and villages) are able to apply for 

the funds. Townships and tribal organizations are also eligible to receive the safety funds but must work with 

their respective county for submittal of the application. The emphasis of the local FY 2020 CFP was to address 

those locations with correctable fatality and injury crashes to support the department’s efforts of reducing 

fatalities and serious injuries striving for Toward Zero Deaths. Per the CFP, the Local Agency was to provide a 

Time of Return (TOR) analysis showing how the proposed improvement would address fatalities and all 

injuries. In the TOR, all crash types and severity levels correctable by the proposed improvement can be 

included. A maximum of five years of available crash data is to be used in the TOR analysis. For FY 2020 call 

for projects, 2012 to 2016 (or the current availability) crash data was used.

Eligible projects must meet current standards and warrants. Project types may be either systemic or spot 

locations and may include replacement, installation or elimination of guardrail, removal of fixed objects from 

clear zones, traffic and pedestrian signal optimization, installation and upgrades of traffic signals, access 

management, horizontal and vertical curve modifications, sight distance and drainage improvements, bridge 

railing replacement or retrofit, roadway intersection improvements specifically to improve safety, mid-block 

pedestrian crossings, improvements to school zones, shoulder and centerline rumble strips, and improved 

permanent signing and pavement markings, or any other safety related work.

For the FY 2020 CFP, a greater emphasis was placed on the identification of correctable fatalities and serious 

injuries, both in the selection and the prioritization of safety projects. In FY 2020, a small portion of the local 

safety funds were allocated to six subprograms (compared to eight subprograms in 2019), with the elimination 

of Systemic Lane Departure projects and Centerline and Shoulder Rumble Strips as the separate program for 

streamlined systemic projects was created. Allocations remained the same as 2019 for three subprograms: 

Regional Traffic Safety Plans ($3 M), Safety Edge ($500 K), and Road Safety Audits ($50 K). Allocations for 

Non-motorized Facility/Pedestrian Improvements ($500 K) and High Friction Surface Treatment ($500 K) were 

increased compared to 2019. Meanwhile, allocation for Guardrail Upgrades and Clear Zone Improvements 

($750 K) was reduced compared to 2019. Each selected project could count towards multiple subprograms. 

Local agencies were informed of the listed subprograms and encouraged to submit related projects.

The Streamlined Systemic program allowed the submittal of four specific project types: Horizontal Curve 

Delineation, Edgeline Pavement Markings (on roadways that did not previously have striped edgelines), 

Rumble Strips/Corrugations (both centerline and edgeline, or both), and Dual Stop and Stop Ahead 

intersection signing. Projects were federally funded at 90 percent up to an amount not to exceed $250,000 of 
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 7 of 57

Federal funding.

There were not any funds directed to tribal organizations in 2020. In 2021, the CFP letter (for FY 2023) was 

updated to clarify the eligibility of tribal organizations and tribal roadways. Additionally, a PowerPoint 

presentation summarizing the program was prepared for tribal outreach. Outreach was conducted by the 

MDOT Tribal Liaison.

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) 

Bureaus, Divisions) are involved with HSIP planning.

• Design

• Districts/Regions

• Maintenance

• Operations

• Planning

• Traffic Engineering/Safety

• Other-Local Agency Programs 

• Other-TSMO

Describe coordination with internal partners.

MDOT's Safety Programs Unit provides support and coordination to internal partners within the Department. 

Each of the seven Regions is comprised of a Traffic Safety and Operations Engineer as well as Traffic and 

Safety Engineers located in the Transportation Service Center (TSC) offices. Employees within the Safety 

Programs Unit distribute the High Crash List and Pavement Friction Analysis to the Region and TSC staff for 

their use in project selection. Road Safety Audits and 3R/4R Safety Reviews are conducted with various 

internal partners located within the Central, Region, and TSC offices. In addition, the Safety Programs Unit 

supports the Regions and TSC's with special data requests in the development of their safety program 

including various types of GIS mapping. 

HSIP funding partnering is also coordinated between the Safety Programs Unit and Local Agency Programs. 

Internal training is also provided to new Traffic and Safety staff including the TOR form, HSM spreadsheet, 

Roadsoft, and general safety information related to the call for projects and MDOT standards and guidance. 

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning.

• Academia/University

• FHWA

• Local Government Agency 

• Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs)

• Other-County Road Association of Michigan 

• Other-Office of Highway Safety Planning

• Other-Michigan's Local Technical Assistance Progam

• Other-State Highway Strategic Planning Action Teams

Describe coordination with external partners.

MDOT coordinates with various Colleges and Universities to provide research opportunities on existing and up 

and coming safety countermeasures. MDOT coordinates with FHWA on existing and proposed federal 

legislation and standards. MDOT also coordinates with the County Road Association, Regional Planning
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 8 of 57

Organizations, and Local Government Agencies to help communicate safety initiatives and safety 

countermeasures. Overall, MDOT is vigilant about coordination with external partners specifically to promote 

Toward Zero Deaths (TZD) initiatives as a member of the Governors Traffic Safety Advisory Council (GTSAC). 

MDOT assists the Office of Highway Safety Planning (OHSP) and the GTSAC in planning Engineering 

sessions for the Annual Michigan Traffic Safety Summit. MDOT provides scholarship opportunities to Local 

Agencies to attend the Traffic Safety Summit to help educate them on TZD Initiatives and to help reduce 

fatalities and serious injuries on every roadway in Michigan. 

Describe HSIP program administration practices that have changed since the last 

reporting period.

A Towards Zero Death (TZD) Champion and Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Engineer Position was 

added since the last reporting period. The position serves as MDOT's specialist for the SHSP representing 

MDOT’s interests on each of the emphasis areas in the SHSP. This position also serves as MDOT’s TZD 

specialist, which involves identifying best practices and innovative ideas to promote TZD both within other state 

departments, county/local road agencies, and private partners with safety interests.

Describe other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to 

elaborate. 

For the State Trunkline Program, safety funds are administered by the Safety Template Program Manager in 

Traffic and Safety (Central Office). For FY 2020, $21.5 M in safety funding was available, of which $15.6 M

was allocated to the seven MDOT Regions as funding targets. Additional template funding was added after the 

original call for projects letter. The allocations were based on the percentage of fatalities and serious injuries, 

lane miles and Vehicle Miles Traveled in each Region. The goal is that all Regions receive a minimum of 5 

percent of the Safety Target.

Beyond the allocated $15.6 M, an additional $4.5 M of the safety funds was reserved by the Traffic and Safety 

area to apply to projects in any Region at their discretion. The Regions were permitted to submit candidate 

projects with total costs exceeding their funding targets; the central office review team then selected the 

projects to be funded in each Region, taking into account priorities expressed by the Regional staffs, and use 

their discretionary funds to apply to worthy projects that exceeded a particular Region’s funding target. All 

project phases; preliminary engineering, construction engineering, right of way and construction are eligible for 

safety funding.

In addition to the $20.1 M of project funding described above, in which project selection was approved by 

central office staff, each Region was given $200,000 for low-cost safety improvements to be chosen at the 

discretion of the Region staff. The Regions use this pot of money for a variety of minor roadside safety 

improvements which can be performed in a timely manner by state forces or contract agencies. Individual 

Safety Work Authorizations (SWA) are the most cost effective method of funding these types of improvements 

and can be initiated quickly throughout the fiscal year in response to safety needs. Federal funds are used for 

those improvements meeting funding criteria.

Once the FY 2020 program was developed, it was reviewed and approved by the Project Screening 

Committee (PSC). The PSC consists of Region and Central Office Program Managers and Planning staff who 

help develop the MDOT’s Five Year Plan for approval by the Transportation Commission. The PSC ensures 

coordination between Regions on various corridors and between the programs.

In FY 2020, the use of HSIP funding continued in the administration of the pavement marking program. Under 

23 U.S.C. 148(e)(1)(c), HSIP funds may be obligated for any project to maintain minimum levels of 

retroreflectivity of traffic signs and pavement markings, without regard to whether that project is included in an 

applicable State SHSP. Prior to FY 2013 Surface Transportation Safety funding was used in the placement of 

pavement markings in the Annual Pavement Marking Program.
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 9 of 57

Local Safety HSIP administration is explained in Question #6.

Program Methodology

Does the State have an HSIP manual or similar that clearly describes HSIP planning, 

implementation and evaluation processes?

Yes 

A HSIP Manual pertaining to the Trunkline HSIP Program, describing the planning, selection, evaluation and 

implementation of HSIP projects was published in June of 2021. This manual is updated yearly to reflect 

changing subcommittees, funding targets and any changes that may be necessary.

A HSIP Manual relating to the Local Agency HSIP Program describing the planning, project selection, 

implementation, and evaluation processes was published in August of 2019. The intent is to update this 

manual periodically as methodology pertaining to the local safety program changes.

MDOT Safety Programs created a guidance that was finalized in July 2020 for trunkline related programs.

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP.

• Other-Pavement Markings 

• Other-Highway Safety Call for Projects

• Other-Local Safety Call for Projects 

• Other-Local Safety High Risk Rural Roads 

• Other-Delineation

Program: Other-Pavement Markings 

Date of Program Methodology:9/1/2015

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• Lane miles • Functional classification

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Other-Retroreflectivity of pavement marking

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 10 of 57

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Other-funding set aside per each Region

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Available funding:1

Cost Effectiveness:2

Program: Other-Highway Safety Call for Projects

Date of Program Methodology:9/15/2011

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

• FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• Other-Focus on fatal and 

serious injury crashes along 

with fixes based on crash types 

and patterns

• Volume

• Lane miles

• Median width

• Horizontal curvature

• Functional classification

• Roadside features

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

• Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

• Level of service of safety (LOSS)

• Probability of specific crash types

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 11 of 57

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Competitive application process

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:3

Available funding:1

Cost Effectiveness:2

Program: Other-Local Safety Call for Projects 

Date of Program Methodology:5/8/2015

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

• FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes • Traffic

• Volume

• Horizontal curvature

• Functional classification

• Roadside features

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

• Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

• Level of service of safety (LOSS)

• Probability of specific crash types

• Relative severity index
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 12 of 57

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Competitive application process

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:2

Available funding:1

Cost Effectiveness:3

Other-Funding set asides for specific countermeasures:4

Program: Other-Local Safety High Risk Rural Roads 

Date of Program Methodology:3/22/2016

What is the justification for this program? 

• FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes • Traffic

• Volume

• Horizontal curvature

• Functional classification

• Roadside features

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

• Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 13 of 57

• Level of service of safety (LOSS)

• Probability of specific crash types

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Competitive application process

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:2

Available funding:1

Cost Effectiveness:3

Program: Other-Delineation

Date of Program Methodology:10/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• Other-Lane departure crashes • Volume • Roadside features

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Probability of specific crash types
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 14 of 57

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Other-funding set aside 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Available funding:1

Cost Effectiveness:2

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements?

 64

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic 

improvements? 

• Cable Median Barriers

• Clear Zone Improvements

• High friction surface treatment

• Horizontal curve signs

• Install/Improve Pavement Marking and/or Delineation

• Install/Improve Signing

• Pavement/Shoulder Widening

• Rumble Strips

• Safety Edge

• Traffic Control Device Rehabilitation

• Upgrade Guard Rails

• Wrong way driving treatments

Systemic projects selected through the Local Safety Call for Projects (CFP) process are awarded a higher 

federal funding percentage (90 percent federal with 10 percent local match) as compared to non-systemic 

projects which have a base funding percentage of 80 percent federal with a 20 percent local match. It should 

be noted that all selected projects that address a fatal or serious (Type A) injury crash are funded at 90 percent 

federal participation. Additionally, the local safety CFP has set asides for High Friction Surface Treatment, 

Rumble Strips, Clear Zone improvements, and Guardrail upgrade projects that are systemic in nature along 

with a separate Streamlined Systemic program described in question #6. Of the Federal HSIP funds obligated 

on the local system in fiscal year 2020, approximately 65 percent of funds went towards systemic projects.
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 15 of 57

The Trunkline Call for Projects (CFP) allowed for up to 25 percent of systemic funded projects. Along with the 

Annual CFP, MDOT elects to construct longitudinal and special pavement markings as part of the HSIP 

program. Overall, in FY 2020, 64 percent of the total HSIP Trunkline Program funds (Safety, Pavement 

Markings, and Delineation) was used for systemic type projects. 20 percent of Trunkline Safety CFP project 

funds were systemic type fixes. See attached Low-cost Safety Improvement Projects that is used to select 

systemic type projects.

Overall, 64 percent of HSIP project funds selected were considered to be systemic type fixes (Trunkline Safety, 

Pavement markings, Delineation, and Local Safety).

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

• Crash data analysis

• Data-driven safety analysis tools (HSM, CMF Clearinghouse, SafetyAnalyst, usRAP)

• Engineering Study

• Road Safety Assessment

• SHSP/Local road safety plan

• Other-High Crash List

• Other-Transparency Report 

• Other-Fatality and Serious Injury Region-wide Maps 

• Other-3R/4R Safety Reviews 

• Other-Pavement Friction Analysis 

• Other-Customer Concerns 

• Other-Local Safety Initiative 

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

Yes

Describe how the State HSIP considers connected vehicles and ITS technologies. 

MDOT is currently considering connected vehicles and ITS technologies as part of the HSIP program. In 

response to the need for wider lane markings and proposed changes to national standards, MDOT has moved 

forward with six-inch-wide lane markings on all freeways in summer 2020. MDOT contractors also placed white 

dotted line extensions on exit and entrance ramps to provide further lane guidance to road users. The 

additional $200,000 investment for six-inch lane markings and $450,000 for dotted line extensions were done 

as part of MDOT’s annual pavement marking restriping projects. Starting in 2021, MDOT will move its attention 

to non-freeways in changing both white and yellow lane lines to six inches wide. This effort will take three to 

four years.

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts?

Yes

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts.

Michigan DOT utilizes Part B of the HSM through continued development and use of AASHTOWare Safety 

Analyst for the trunkline roadways. The locations that are determined from Safety Analyst are then provided to 

Region and Transportation Service Center offices. As they evaluate the locations on the list, Michigan’s own 

HSM spreadsheet is utilized to develop a substantive perspective. The quantitative performance of alternatives 

allowed in the spreadsheet have come from what will soon been three separate research efforts to better 

understand safety performance in Michigan. Regionally, it was found that there are differences resulting in the 

latest version of our HSM spreadsheet to account for this in the analysis. Road Safety Audits have been 
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 16 of 57

performed both informally and formally that utilize the Michigan HSM spreadsheet based on suggested 

improvements. Training on the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) was completed in 2016 and 

2018. Since then, a build of the software has been provided throughout MDOT and is available for use external 

to the agency. The latest version of the software is being evaluated to incorporate the research outputs for 

non-freeway urban and rural site types. In Safety Analyst, the emphasis areas of Bicycle, Pedestrian, Run-offRoad, Alcohol, Commercial Vehicle, Work Zone and light condition have been built in to provide additional 

functionality. Safety Analyst was also used as one of the deciding factors in the determination of the locations 

for increasing speed limits.

The Trunkline Safety Call for Projects requires that a HSM analysis be completed for all qualifying nonfreeway, non-systemic projects. The Local Safety Call for Projects recommends the HSM to be submitted for 

additional project support. An internal MDOT HSM training was conducted in June of 2019 including an 

updated analysis spreadsheet. 

Describe other aspects of the HSIP methodology on which the State would like to 

elaborate.

The annual Trunkline process for submitting safety projects starts with a Call for Projects (CFP) issued to the 

seven MDOT Regions from the Safety Template Program Manager. The FY 2020 Safety Call request was 

made to the Regions on September 15, 2014. In response to the CFP, the Regions identify locations where 

safety improvements (i.e. add a center left turn lane, right turn lane, geometric improvements to accommodate 

signalization, median protection, etc.) could be made. These locations are to be identified through the current 

Transparency (5%) Report, Fatality and Serious Injury Regionwide Maps, High Crash List, 3R/4R Safety 

Reviews, customer concerns, and Pavement Friction Analyses. Upon location identification an engineering 

study is conducted by the Region to determine the appropriate safety improvement. The emphasis of the 

Safety Call was to address those locations with correctable fatality and serious injury crashes to support the 

department’s efforts of reducing fatalities and serious injuries and support the vision of Toward Zero Deaths 

(TZD). 

All safety projects and proposed candidates must address a focus area of the Michigan Strategic Highway 

Safety Plan (SHSP). Submitted concepts must meet a maximum Time-of-Return (TOR) to qualify for safety 

funding. The TOR is a cost benefit analysis of proposed safety improvement which considers all crash types 

and severity levels that are correctable by the proposed safety improvement. A minimum of the latest three 

years of available crash data is to be used in the TOR analysis. For FY 2020 project, in which 2011 to 2013 (or 

most current data available) crash data was used. The following TOR criteria was established:

• Stand alone safety improvement - TOR of 7 years or less

• Stand alone safety improvement for location on the current Transparency (5%) or High Crash Report 

– TOR of 10 years or less.

• Safety improvement in conjunction with another Construction project (Bridge, R&R, etc.) - TOR of 9 

years or less.

Each Region’s submittal was reviewed by the Central office review team to ensure all criteria was met. The 

Regions were permitted to submit candidate projects with total costs exceeding their funding targets. The 

review team, taking into account priorities expressed by the Regions, used the TOR values as a means to 

develop project rankings (lowest to highest TOR value) within each Region. Due to increased funding for 2018 

to 2023, the discretionary allocation for FY 2020 was $4.5 M. The TOR values for projects beyond funding 

targets were used to allocate $4.5 M of discretionary funds statewide.
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 17 of 57

For FY 2020, funding was included in programmed preliminary engineering for outer year safety projects to 

conduct a road safety audit (RSA). For guidance, a RSA should be conducted for all proposals exceeding 

$750,000 in programmed construction costs. Each Region was required to conduct at least one RSA for a FY 

2020 improvement projects. The RSA should be done prior to 30 percent completion of the plans. The purpose 

of the RSA is to ensure that the appropriate safety fixes are incorporated into the overall design based on 

crash patterns within the project limits.

Continuing in FY 2020 each Region was required to allocate up to a certain percent of their funding target for 

low cost safety improvements. This amount is in addition to the Safety Work Authorizations (SWA funding). 

The focus is to be on system wide safety improvements done by work authorization or through the letting 

process, each Region received $200,000 for FY 2019. A TOR justification is not required if the proposed 

improvement is selected from the list of approved and proven safety system wide fixes (Eligibility Guidelines for 

Low Cost Safety Improvement Projects-see attachment). For FY 2018 through 2020 this percentage was 

increased to 25 percent. For FY 2021 to FY 2025 the percentage submitted shall be a minimum of 25 percent 

up to a maximum of 50 percent over a five-year rolling average period. 

In an effort to incorporate the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) into MDOT’s business process all safety projects 

submitted for FY 2020 to present, except for freeway improvements, shall have the HSM predictive analysis 

performed on them. A comparison of future conditions with and without the proposed improvement shall be 

provided. Starting for FY 2020 and continuing for FY 2021 to FY 2025, all submitted concepts must address 

two or more fatal and/or serious injury crashes and align with their Region Toward Zero Deaths plan.

See Question #6 for the HSIP methodology for Local HSIP/HRRR Safety.
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 18 of 57

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for HSIP funding.

State Fiscal Year

The State Fiscal year ran from October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020.

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category.

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % 

OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $66,085,505 $63,651,527 96.32%

HRRR Special Rule (23 

U.S.C. 148(g)(1))

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

154)

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

164)

$0 $0 0%

RHCP (for HSIP 

purposes) (23 U.S.C. 

130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds 

(i.e. STBG, NHPP)

$0 $0 0%

State and Local Funds $205,863 $205,863 100%

Totals $66,291,368 $63,857,390 96.33%

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal 

safety projects?

$19,261,096

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects?

$16,827,118

The local safety program is generally over programmed (above $15.8 M) to ensure that all allocated local HSIP 

funds are obligated and utilized. Additionally, obligational authority for the local safety program comes out of 

the local urban obligational authority and projects are obligated on a first come first serve basis. Therefore, the 

local safety program occasionally obligates additional federal funds over the budgeted (~$15.8 M) amount.

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects?

0%

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects?

0%
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 19 of 57

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas 

during the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$0

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during 

the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$0

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in 

the future.

Overall, the time frame to obligate a specific project is longer due to MPO required approvals. During the end 

of the fiscal year when there is bid savings from earlier projects coming under budget, some Regions cannot 

use said money for a new project due to the lengthy approval process of the MPO. 

MDOT promotes the Toward Zero Deaths campaign to the citizens of Michigan, however not being able to use 

HSIP funds for educational and promotional materials has made this social media campaign challenging, as 

we have to seek other funding sources within the department, which are also constrained.

Describe any other aspects of the State’s progress in implementing HSIP projects on 

which the State would like to elaborate. 

During the reporting period, FY 2020, 0.22 percent of the programmed and obligated funds of the HSIP State 

Trunkline system were directed to miscellaneous (previously non-infrastructure) safety items such as Road 

Safety Audits and Work Zone Enforcement. 

On the Local Agency side no HSIP funds were directed toward tribal safety projects. In FY 2020, none of the 

obligated funds for the Local system were directed to non-infrastructure safety items such as Road Safety 

Audits and a Before and After study. Overall, 24.6 percent of the total programmed and 26.0 percent of the 

total obligated federal HSIP/HRRR funds were directed to local safety projects.

Overall, 14.9 percent of obligated (11.3 percent programmed) funds used were from State and Local funding 

sources.
Page 20 of 57 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

General Listing of Projects 

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period. 

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

127506 - US-10, 

Flajole Rd to I-75 

Roadside Barrier- metal 10.914 Miles $3221715 $3221715 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways 

31,000 70 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

129185 US-23 NB, 

Baldwin Rd to Hill Rd 

Roadside Barrier- metal 4.55 Miles $1204747 $1204747 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways 

48,300 70 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

201953 - M-57 at 

Irish Rd 

Intersection 

geometry 

Intersection geometry -

other 

1 Intersections $231507 $231507 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Minor Arterial 6,100 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

202009 - M-20 at 

US-127 NB Ramps 

Interchange 

design 

Interchange design - other 1 Locations $348295 $348295 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate 13,200 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

204857 - I69BL-E, 

27th St to 6th St 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other 

1.54 Miles $93875 $93875 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 3,550 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

204911 - I-75 NB 

Exit Ramp at M-21 

Roadside Increase clear zone – 

tangent 

1 Intersections $79121 $79121 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate 12,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

204923 - US-23 N, 

Thompson Rd to 

Baldwin Rd 

Roadside Roadside - other 1.531 Miles $117930 $117930 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate 48,300 70 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

209392 - M-15 at 

Coldwater Rd 

Intersection 

geometry 

Intersection geometry -

other 

1 Intersections $80000 $80000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Minor Arterial 5,800 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

126117 - M-57, 

Farland Ave to 

Ramsdell Dr 

Roadway Roadway widening - add 

lane(s) along segment 

2.01 Miles $39000 $39000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Minor Arterial 13,100 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

127038 - M-91, Peck 

Rd to Colby Rd 

Intersection 

geometry 

Intersection realignment 0.863 Miles $1552000 $1552000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Minor Arterial 6,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

208003 -

Regionwide 

Roadside Barrier- metal 0.788 Miles $125863 $125863 State and 

Local Funds 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

209415 - US-131 at 

Hall St and Wealthy 

St 

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS 

Wrong-way Driving 

Detection System 

0.545 Miles $80000 $80000 State and 

Local Funds 

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways 

105,200 70 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

127697 - M-3, 

Gratiot Ave at I-75 

Connector 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Medians and pedestrian 

refuge areas 

0.258 Miles $401299 $401299 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 19,200 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Pedestrians Reduce F's 

& A's 
Page 21 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

128781 - Various 

locations in Macomb 

County 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Pedestrians and bicyclists 

– other 

0 Miles $565047 $565047 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Pedestrians Reduce F's 

& A's 

129205 -

Regionwide 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other 

0 Miles $72118 $72118 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

132599 -

Regionwide 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Sign sheeting - upgrade or 

replacement 

0 Miles $86000 $86000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

132615 -

Regionwide 

Roadway Rumble strips – edge or 

shoulder 

0 Miles $158000 $158000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

201987 - M-53, 18 

Mile to 27 Mile 

Roadside Barrier – cable 9.636 Miles $244352 $244352 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways 

35,750 70 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

204904 - M-10 SB 

Exit Ramps 

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS 

Wrong-way Driving 

Detection System 

0.75 Miles $160000 $160000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways 

52,700 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

204953 - I-75 BL, 

Woodward Ave at 

South Blvd 

Interchange 

design 

Innovative Interchange 

Modifications 

0.585 Miles $475000 $475000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 23,800 45 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

209356- I-94 EB Roadway Pavement surface – high 

friction surface 

1.354 Miles $590593 $590593 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate 91,500 70 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

209692 -

Regionwide 

Miscellaneous Work zone enforcement 1 Locations $94000 $94000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Work Zones Reduce F's 

& A's 

209693 -

Regionwide 

Miscellaneous Work zone enforcement 1 Locations $94000 $94000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Work Zones Reduce F's 

& A's 

210125 - M-10, M10 Ramp to Bagley 

St 

Roadway Pavement surface – high 

friction surface 

0.364 Miles $279497 $279497 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways 

35,800 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

128971 - US-31, W 

Silver Lake Rd to 

Sullivan Rd 

Roadway Roadway widening - add 

lane(s) along segment 

0.687 Miles $1323450 $1323450 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther 14,700 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

132593 - US-31, 

Griffin St to north of 

11th St 

Roadway Roadway widening - add 

lane(s) along segment 

0.299 Miles $1265479 $1265479 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther 19,700 45 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

132601 - M-32, Fair 

Rd to W. Otsego 

County Line 

Roadway Roadway - other 34.457 Miles $127802 $127802 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 
Page 22 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

201929 - I-75, M-93 

to Marlette Rd 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

11.683 Miles $91344 $91344 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate 17,500 75 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

201999 - I-75, 

Marlette Rd to I-75 

BL 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

8.249 Miles $1077734 $1077734 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate 15,500 75 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

207196 - US-31, 

Holiday Rd to Five 

Mile Rd 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Medians and pedestrian 

refuge areas 

0.9 Miles $353493 $353493 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther 23,900 45 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Pedestrians Reduce F's 

& A's 

209094 -

Regionwide 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Curve-related warning 

signs and flashers 

15.213 Miles $121609 $121609 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

210154 - US-31 at 

M-22 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify control – Modern 

Roundabout 

1 Intersections $209270 $209270 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther 19,200 30 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

210293 - M-113 at 

Vans Rd and M-22 

at River Rd 

Roadway Pavement surface – high 

friction surface 

2 Locations $211034 $211034 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

210313 -

Regionwide 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Pedestrian signal - other 0 Miles $87000 $87000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Pedestrians Reduce F's 

& A's 

127639 - I-94 W 

Ramp at Wheatfield 

Rd 

Roadway Roadway - other 1 Locations $414000 $414000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate 3,600 70 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

129071 - M-43 at 

28th St 

Intersection 

geometry 

Intersection realignment 1 Intersections $120000 $120000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Minor Arterial 12,500 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

201123 - US-12 

throughout Branch 

County 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Sign sheeting - upgrade or 

replacement 

27.138 Miles $122000 $122000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

201967 - I-94 W 

between I-94 Bl and 

40th St 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

6.812 Miles $52835 $52835 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate 45,500 70 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

201994 - M-60 

throughout Marshall 

TSC area 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Intersection traffic control -

other 

0 Miles $77000 $77000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

202018 - M-62 at 

May St 

Intersection 

geometry 

Intersection geometry -

other 

1 Intersections $280000 $280000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Minor Arterial 9,100 45 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

204804 - M-40, US12 to Marcellus 

Village Limit 

Roadway Rumble strips – center 15.097 Miles $80000 $80000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Minor Arterial 3,300 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 
Page 23 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

209402 - US-12, 

Edwardsburg Village 

limit east to Brady 

Rd 

Shoulder 

treatments 

Widen shoulder – paved or 

other (includes add 

shoulder) 

2.347 Miles $133161 $133161 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Minor Arterial 6,600 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

210101 -

Regionwide 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Intersection signing – add 

enhanced regulatory sign 

(double-up and/or 

oversize) 

30.274 Miles $93500 $93500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

120388 - M-28, 

FFH-13 to M-94 

Shoulder 

treatments 

Widen shoulder – paved or 

other (includes add 

shoulder) 

7.29 Miles $76100 $76100 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Principal ArterialOther 2,600 65 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

127585 -

Regionwide 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

0 Miles $149624 $149624 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

N/A N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

129413 -

Regionwide 

Roadway Rumble strips – edge or 

shoulder 

0 Miles $1240000 $1240000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

N/A N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

132465 -

Regionwide 

Roadway Rumble strips –other 0 Miles $60000 $60000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

N/A N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

201941 - US-41 at 

Lakeshore Dr 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify control – Modern 

Roundabout 

1 Intersections $805775 $805775 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther 15,600 45 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

201944 - US-41 

from 0.5 miles esat 

of Pond Rd to Forest 

Dr 

Intersection 

geometry 

Intersection geometry -

other 

1.29 Miles $104876 $104876 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther 17,800 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

209385 - M-28 from 

M-64 South to M-64 

North 

Shoulder 

treatments 

Widen shoulder – paved or 

other (includes add 

shoulder) 

4.08 Miles $14300 $14300 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther 1,700 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

209758 - US-41 at 

Boston Rd 

Access 

management 

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access 

1 Intersections $274000 $274000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Minor Arterial 6,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

210805 - various 

locations along US-2 

Access 

management 

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access 

11.464 Miles $50000 $50000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

129137 - Various 

Locations on M-156 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Install sidewalk 0.33 Miles $50000 $50000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Major Collector 1,750 35 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Pedestrians Reduce F's 

& A's 

129167 - M-99 

Eaton County 

Roadway Roadway - other 2.235 Miles $199357 $199357 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Minor Arterial 6,100 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 
Page 24 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

129168 - I-96 near 

Okemos Rd 

Roadside Barrier- metal 1.619 Miles $117990 $117990 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate 50,000 70 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

132613 - M-59 from 

Cullen Rd to 950' 

east of Hartland 

Woods 

Intersection 

geometry 

Add/modify auxiliary lanes 0.672 Miles $2315111 $2315111 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther 16,500 55 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce F's 

& A's 

204947 - I-96 from 

Clinton County Line 

to I-69 

Roadside Barrier – cable 9.608 Miles $467500 $467500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate 53,100 70 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

205833 - M-17 

sidewalks in Ann 

Arbor and Ypsilanti 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Install sidewalk 0.095 Miles $74062 $74062 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Pedestrians Reduce F's 

& A's 

206241 - US-23 N 

from Geddes Rd to 

Ellsworth 

Roadside Barrier – cable 3.155 Miles $351465 $351465 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways 

67,000 70 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206504 - M-43 and I69 BL sidewalks Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Install sidewalk 0.276 Miles $34000 $34000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways 

24,700 45 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Pedestrians Reduce F's 

& A's 

209346 - Statewide 

2020 Safety Summit 

Local Agency 

Workforce 

Development 

Miscellaneous Training and workforce 

development 

7 Regions $25000 $25000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

N/A N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Data Reduce F's 

& A's 

210042 - Statewide 

RSAs 

Miscellaneous Road safety audits 7 Regions $300000 $300000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

N/A N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Data Reduce F's 

& A's 

210127 - Statewide 

Before and After 

Study 2012-2015 

Miscellaneous Data analysis 7 Regions $50000 $50000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

N/A N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Data Reduce F's 

& A's 

211084 - Statewide 

Data Driven Safety 

Analysis 

Implementation 

Miscellaneous Data analysis 7 Regions $65000 $65000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

N/A N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Data Reduce F's 

& A's 

206483 - Bay 

Region Longitudinal 

Pavement Marking 

Application 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

4800 Miles $2970000 $2970000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206487 - Bay 

Region - Special 

pavement marking 

application 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

1863 Locations $727500 $727500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 
Page 25 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

206558 - Bay 

Region 

retroreflectivity 

readings 

Roadway 

delineation 

Improve retroreflectivity 1046 Miles $14664 $14664 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

207279 - Bay 

Region Longitudinal 

Pavement Marking 

Design 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

0 Miles $20000 $20000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

207281 - Bay 

Region Special 

Pavement Marking 

Design 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

0 Locations $10000 $10000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206495 - Grand 

Region Longitudinal 

Pavement Marking 

Appilcation 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

4242 Miles $2992500 $2992500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206541 - Grand 

Region Special 

Pavement Marking 

Application 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

844 Locations $342500 $342500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206559 - Grand 

Region Pavement 

Marking 

Retroreflectivity 

Readings 

Roadway 

delineation 

Improve retroreflectivity 1161 Miles $17000 $17000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

207283 - Grand 

Region Longitudinal 

Pavement Marking 

Design 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

0 Miles $10000 $10000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206002 - Metro 

Region Pavement 

Marking 

Retroreflectivity 

Readings 

Roadway 

delineation 

Improve retroreflectivity 591 Miles $19000 $19000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206542 - Metro 

Region Longitudinal 

Pavement Marking 

Appilcation 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

2687 Miles $2935000 $2935000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206543 - Metro 

Region Special 

Pavement Marking 

Application 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

2717 Locations $1135000 $1135000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

207286 - Metro 

Region Longitudinal 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

0 Miles $10200 $10200 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 
Page 26 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Pavement Marking 

Design 

207287 - Metro 

Region Special 

Pavement Marking 

Design 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

0 Locations $10000 $10000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206003 - North 

Region Pavement 

Marking 

Retroreflectivity 

Readings 

Roadway 

delineation 

Improve retroreflectivity 1079 Miles $17000 $17000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206544 - North 

Region Longitudinal 

Pavement Marking 

Appilcation 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

4773 Miles $2098500 $2098500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206545 - North 

Region Special 

Pavement Marking 

Application 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

1004 Locations $532500 $532500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

207288 - North 

Region Longitudinal 

Pavement Marking 

Design 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

0 Miles $11600 $11600 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

207291 - North 

Region Special 

Pavement Marking 

Design 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

0 Locations $13000 $13000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206006 - Southwest 

Region Pavement 

Marking 

Retroreflectivity 

Readings 

Roadway 

delineation 

Improve retroreflectivity 770 Miles $12000 $12000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206546 - Southwest 

Region Longitudinal 

Pavement Marking 

Appilcation 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

3050 Miles $1825000 $1825000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206547 - Southwest 

Region Special 

Pavement Marking 

Application 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

1681 Locations $455000 $455000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

207293 - Southwest 

Region Longitudinal 

Pavement Marking 

Design 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

0 Miles $10000 $10000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 
Page 27 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

207295 - Southwest 

Region Special 

Pavement Marking 

Design 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

0 Locations $10000 $10000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206549 - Superior 

Region Longitudinal 

Pavement Marking 

Appilcation 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

4535 Miles $2246000 $2246000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206551 - Superior 

Region Special 

Pavement Marking 

Application 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

808 Locations $535000 $535000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206561 - Superior 

Region Pavement 

Marking 

Retroreflectivity 

Readings 

Roadway 

delineation 

Improve retroreflectivity 882 Miles $17000 $17000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

207296 - Superior 

Region Longitudinal 

Pavement Marking 

Design 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

0 Miles $12000 $12000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

207297 - Superior 

Region Special 

Pavement Marking 

Design 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

0 Locations $18000 $18000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206553 - University 

Region Longitudinal 

Pavement Marking 

Appilcation 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking 

4036 Miles $2737500 $2737500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206555 - University 

Region Special 

Pavement Marking 

Application 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

1448 Locations $515000 $515000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206562 - University 

Region Pavement 

Marking 

Retroreflectivity 

Readings 

Roadway 

delineation 

Improve retroreflectivity 910 Miles $15000 $15000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

201946 - I-75 S 

Genessee County 

Line north to Wilder 

Rd, All of I-675 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

38.622 Miles $157400 $157400 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

201998 - Metro 

Region Various 

Routes install 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

66.606 Miles $106758 $106758 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 
Page 28 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

flexible delineators 

on exit and entrance 

ramps 

132466 - US-31 

non-freeway 

roadside delineator 

installation 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

86.736 Miles $22027 $22027 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

201948 - M-55 

delineation 

installation in 

Wexford and 

Manistee County 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

157.227 Miles $345000 $345000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

201952 - Delineation 

Installation on 

various routes in 

Traverse City TSC 

area 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

75.214 Miles $22263 $22263 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

204917 - I-75 

guardrail delineation 

in Gaylord TSC area 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

123.268 Miles $312906 $312906 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate 75 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

209782 - Delineation 

Installation in Alpena 

TSC area 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

65.192 Miles $197853 $197853 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

209601 - US-223 

Delineation 

Installation 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

2.232 Miles $113771 $113771 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce F's 

& A's 

206921 Systemic 

intersection signing -

Calhoun County 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Intersection signing – add 

enhanced regulatory sign 

(double-up and/or 

oversize) 

6 Intersections $23455 $25696 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 1,750 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207208 13 Mile 

Road at Michigan 

Avenue 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Intersection signing – add 

enhanced regulatory sign 

(double-up and/or 

oversize) 

1 Intersections $2160 $3435 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 750 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

206743 Systemic 

curve signing -

Clinton County 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Curve-related warning 

signs and flashers 

32 Curves $33711 $37457 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 1,800 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

206922 Systemic 

curve signing -

Dickinson County 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Curve-related warning 

signs and flashers 

16.7 Miles $55779 $61976 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 420 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 
 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

Page 29 of 57 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

206923 Systemic 

curve signing -

Emmet County 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Curve-related warning 

signs and flashers 

19.83 Miles $178758 $198620 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 4,974 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

206924 Systemic 

Edgelines - Jackson 

County 

Roadway 

delineation 

Longitudinal pavement 

markings – new 

100.52 Miles $214684 $238539 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 4,500 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207182 Systemic 

intersection signing -

Jackson County 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Intersection signing – add 

enhanced regulatory sign 

(double-up and/or 

oversize) 

9 Intersections $19862 $22069 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 7,500 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207188 Systemic 

intersections -

Kalamazoo County 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Intersection signing – add 

enhanced regulatory sign 

(double-up and/or 

oversize) 

794 Signs $265500 $269841 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 2,000 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207191 Systemic 

rumble strips -

Macomb County 

Roadway Rumble strips – center 30 Miles $241200 $252995 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 14,612 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207192 Systemic 

rumble strips -

Macomb County 

Roadway Rumble strips – center 20 Miles $136350 $142053 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 16,336 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

209154 Armada 

Ridge Road 

Roadway Rumble strips – center 1.21 Miles $11010 $12233 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 2,653 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207193 Systemic 

curve signing -

Midland County 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Curve-related warning 

signs and flashers 

1201 Signs $196756 $263846 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 8,742 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207195 Systemic 

curve signing -

Muskegon County 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Curve-related warning 

signs and flashers 

838 Signs $176400 $197598 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 1,500 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207197 Systemic 

intersection signing -

Muskegon County 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Intersection signing – add 

enhanced regulatory sign 

(double-up and/or 

oversize) 

10 Intersections $37837 $42041 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 1,500 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207198 Systemic 

curve signing -

Oceana County 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Curve-related warning 

signs and flashers 

47.8 Miles $174859 $194090 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 2,000 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 
Page 30 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

207203 CR437 and 

CR498 

Roadway Rumble strips – center 16.5 Miles $82589 $91765 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 1,050 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207261 Barry 

County guardrail 

Roadside Barrier- metal 13 Locations $339978 $377754 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Major Collector 2,736 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207262 village of 

Lake Ann guardrail 

Roadside Barrier- metal 7 Locations $221779 $249421 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 2,106 55 Town or 

Township 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207264 Calhoun 

County overhead 

flashing beacons 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Intersection flashers –signmounted or overhead 3 Intersections $48490 $53878 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 1,918 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207265 Partello 

Road at 20 Mile 

Road 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Intersection flashers –signmounted or overhead 1 Intersections $16455 $18283 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 1,512 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207349 S Drive 

South from M-66 to 

1 1/2 Mile Road 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

1.63 Miles $21973 $24414 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 828 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207351 CR 420 

(21st Road) from the 

Escanaba River to 

west of 0.85 Road 

Roadside Barrier- metal 0.68 Miles $134496 $149440 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Minor Arterial 2,400 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207352 Systemic 

backplates - city of 

Grand Blanc 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – add 

backplates with 

retroreflective borders 

7 Intersections $304785 $317790 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 34,900 35 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207353 Davision 

Road from Oak 

Road to Cummings 

Road 

Roadway Roadway widening - travel 

lanes 

0.5 Miles $378000 $495568 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Minor Arterial 7,453 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207354 Genesee 

County restriping to 

create headed-up 

left turn lanes 

Intersection 

geometry 

Modify lane assignment 14 Intersections $38880 $41938 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 25,065 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207355 McCulloch 

Road from 

Beaverton Road to 

Spicer Road 

Roadway Pavement surface – high 

friction surface 

0.64 Miles $152000 $186534 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 1,430 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 
Page 31 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

207407 Hockaday 

Road at Weber 

Road 

Roadway Pavement surface – high 

friction surface 

0.19 Miles $96282 $120353 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 1,590 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207411 Gratiot 

County guardrail 

Roadside Barrier- metal 8 Locations $141300 $152950 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 1,208 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207412 Begole 

Road at Cheesman 

Road 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify control – new traffic 

signal 

1 Intersections $600000 $737430 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Minor Arterial 6,522 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207413 Harrison 

Road from E 

Michigan Avenue 

(M-143) to W Grand 

River Avenue (M-43) 

road-diet and bike 

lanes 

Roadway Roadway narrowing (road 

diet, roadway 

reconfiguration) 

0.3 Miles $122268 $233888 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Minor Arterial 9,670 25 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Bicyclists Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207419 Waverly 

Road from Old 

Lansing Road to St. 

Joseph Highway 

shared use path 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Pedestrians and bicyclists 

– other 

1.17 Miles $333000 $352988 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 20,200 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Pedestrians Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207421 F-41 from 

Lake State Railway 

to Beard Road 

Roadway Pavement surface – high 

friction surface 

0.3 Miles $243000 $267418 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Minor Arterial 8,900 40 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207422 East Paris 

Avenue SE at 

Burton Street SE 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – 

modernization/replacemen 

t 

1 Intersections $178400 $235589 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Minor Arterial 12,700 35 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207424 Fuller 

Avenue at Malta 

Street, Fuller 

Avenue at Short 

Street/Bradford 

Street, Fuller 

Avenue at Sweet 

Street 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal –other 3 Intersections $349155 $406129 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 12,700 35 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207426 Fuller 

Avenue at Leonard 

Street, Fuller 

Avenue at Knapp 

Street, Fuller 

Avenue at Aberdeen 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – 

modernization/replacemen 

t 

4 Intersections $494204 $561672 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 12,700 35 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 
Page 32 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Street, Fuller 

Avenue at 3 Mile 

Road 

207427 Leonard 

Street at Scribner 

Avenue 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – 

modernization/replacemen 

t 

1 Intersections $237600 $244973 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 12,700 35 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207428 Backplates -

Macomb County 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – add 

backplates with 

retroreflective borders 

8 Intersections $81000 $82539 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 29,600 50 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207431 Backplates -

Macomb County 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – add 

backplates with 

retroreflective borders 

21 Intersections $155700 $165063 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 27,500 50 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207434 Schoenherr 

at Metro Parkway, 

Metro Parkway at 

Dodge Park, 

Moravian at 15 Mile 

Road, Hayes Road 

at Shoreline 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – 

modernization/replacemen 

t 

4 Intersections $241200 $909688 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 29,600 50 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207435 12 Mile 

Road at Milton, 12 

Mile Road at Tech 

Drive/Arsenal, 12 

Mile Road at Burnet, 

9 Mile Road at 

Mound Road 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – 

modernization/replacemen 

t 

4 Intersections $190800 $238166 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 27,500 50 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207436 CR 492 (CR 

HQ) from US-41 to 

Commerce 

Drive/Forestville 

Road 

Roadway Roadway - other 0.62 Miles $94770 $106144 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Minor Arterial 6,424 45 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207437 Baldwin 

Avenue between 

Cesar Chavez and 

Walton Boulevard 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – 

modernization/replacemen 

t 

6 Intersections $624000 $904334 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 16,400 35 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207438 Martin 

Luther King Jr. 

Boulevard at 

Featherstone Street 

and at University 

Drive 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – 

modernization/replacemen 

t 

2 Intersections $375520 $532249 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 25,530 35 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 
Page 33 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

207439 Systemic 

backplates -

Oakland County 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – add 

backplates with 

retroreflective borders 

85 Intersections $322920 $332602 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 21,880 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207443 Ottawa 

Beach Road 

between Bower 

Street and 3rd 

Avenue 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Rapid Rectangular 

Flashing Beacons (RRFB) 

4 Locations $56530 $70579 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Minor Arterial 9,672 35 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Pedestrians Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207444 Schoolcraft 

County - 5 roadways 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Roadway signs (including 

post) - new or updated 

17.4 Miles $58945 $65494 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 780 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207446 Schoolcraft 

County guardrail 

Roadside Barrier- metal 4 Locations $84370 $93745 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 730 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207447 Huron 

Parkway at Glazier 

Way and Huron 

Parkway at Baxter 

Street 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Rapid Rectangular 

Flashing Beacons (RRFB) 

2 Locations $84558 $93953 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Minor Arterial 25,800 40 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Pedestrians Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207448 S Hewittt 

Road between 

Burns Avenue and 

Harding Avenue 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Install sidewalk 0.08 Miles $280667 $293061 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Minor Arterial 8,254 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Pedestrians Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207449 Wagner 

Road from 

approximately 900 

feet south of Liberty 

Road to Huron River 

Drive 

Roadway Roadway - other 3.4 Miles $327227 $363586 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 7,208 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207451 Wagner 

Road from Ann 

Arbor-Saline Road 

to approximately 

900 feet south of 

Liberty Road 

Roadway Roadway - other 3.54 Miles $600000 $680912 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Minor Arterial 9,902 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207452 city of 

Dearborn pedestrian 

crossings 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Rapid Rectangular 

Flashing Beacons (RRFB) 

4 Locations $87456 $100358 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 10,800 35 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Pedestrians Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207453 Kelly Road 

near Cushing Street 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Pedestrian hybrid beacon 1 Locations $151408 $168231 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Minor Arterial 18,700 35 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Pedestrians Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 
Page 34 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

207454 Ecorse 

Road at Pelham 

Road 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – 

modernization/replacemen 

t 

1 Intersections $220783 $266043 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 27,000 40 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207455 Eureka 

Road at Dix Toledo 

Highway 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – 

modernization/replacemen 

t 

1 Intersections $227775 $272739 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 47,000 40 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207456 Hannan 

Road at North Line 

Road 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify control – new traffic 

signal 

1 Intersections $169705 $1530842 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Major Collector 3,150 50 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207457 Van Born 

Road at Beech-Daly 

Road 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – 

modernization/replacemen 

t 

1 Intersections $204962 $235705 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 19,900 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

210416 Barry 

County guardrail 

Roadside Barrier- metal 18 Locations $495888 $524034 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 2,427 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

202898 Genesee 

County - Preliminary 

Engineering for 

backplates 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal – add 

backplates with 

retroreflective borders 

14 Intersections $8358 $9194 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 18,000 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

203421 Maple Road 

at Southfield Road 

intersection 

Intersection 

geometry 

Intersection realignment 1 Intersections $265700 $485277 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 25,000 25 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

127385 Drake Road 

shared use path 

from West Michigan 

Avenue to 

Greenmeadow 

Road 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists 

Pedestrians and bicyclists 

– other 

0.42 Miles $316376 $636957 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Principal ArterialOther 27,827 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Pedestrians Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

200454 Isabella 

Road at Bluegrass 

Road; Isabella Road 

at Broomfield Road; 

Isabella Road at 

Remus Road 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify traffic signal –other 3 Intersections $600000 $863992 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 14,450 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

210237 Preliminary 

Engineering for 

County Road 582 at 

Amy School Road 

(East Intersection) 

Roadway Install / remove / modify 

passing zone 

0.2 Miles $8578 $17156 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 4,817 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 
Page 35 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

210243 Preliminary 

Engineering for 

Federal Road from 

Pierson Road to 

Cannonsville Road 

Shoulder 

treatments 

Widen shoulder – paved or 

other (includes add 

shoulder) 

1.15 Miles $18550 $37100 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 6,070 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

210234 Preliminary 

Engineering for 

Wood Street at 

Sam's Way 

Roadway Pavement surface – high 

friction surface 

1 Intersections $8109 $16218 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Minor Arterial 8,500 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

210306 Hinckley 

Boulevard/Stonewal 

l Road at Badgley 

Road and Hinckley 

Boulevard at Browns 

Lake Road 

Miscellaneous Road safety audits 1 Study $16000 $20000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 19,865 40 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Safety 

Analysis 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

210307 Hinckley 

Boulevard/Stonewal 

l Road at Badgley 

Road and Hinckley 

Boulevard at Browns 

Lake Road 

Miscellaneous Road safety audits 1 Study $16000 $20000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Urban Multiple/Varies 6,923 40 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Safety 

Analysis 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207217 Pine River 

Road from east of 

LaClair Road to the 

Pine River 

Roadway Superelevation / cross 

slope 

1.03 Miles $382817 $506682 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Minor Collector 405 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207218 Linco Road 

from east of 

Hollywood Road to 

west of Garr Road 

Roadside Barrier- metal 2.33 Miles $410055 $449199 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Minor Collector 1,227 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207219 Southern 

Road from Whaley 

Road to Flint Road 

Roadway Superelevation / cross 

slope 

1 Miles $180900 $219867 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 1,332 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207221 Banfield 

Road from M-37 to 

Base Line Road 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

0.96 Miles $12178 $13531 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 1,182 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207222 N Drive 

North from 9 1/2 Mile 

Road to 12 Mile 

Road 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

2.26 Miles $8285 $9205 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 1,462 50 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207223 N Drive 

North from 12 Mile 

Road to 14 Mile 

Road 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

1.97 Miles $8884 $9871 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 1,832 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 
Page 36 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

207224 Whittemore 

Road from South 

Towerline Road to 

South Britt Road; 

Kokosing Road from 

Lakeside Boulevard 

to M-65 

Shoulder 

treatments 

Widen shoulder – paved or 

other (includes add 

shoulder) 

2.1 Miles $198000 $227677 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 600 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207225 Jefferson 

Road from Meridian 

Road (US-127) to 

Hyde Road 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

1.04 Miles $62200 $69111 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 6,100 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207226 W Michigan 

Avenue from Chapel 

Road to N 

Sandstone Road 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

2.01 Miles $109333 $121481 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 6,400 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207227 South 

Jackson Road at 

Lindsey Road 

Intersection 

geometry 

Intersection realignment 1 Intersections $166105 $184562 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 2,200 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207248 S Avenue 

from west of 34th 

Street to 36th Street 

Roadway Roadway widening - add 

lane(s) along segment 

1.2 Miles $513000 $1415500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 598 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Lane 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207249 G Avenue 

from 2nd Street to 

6th Street 

Shoulder 

treatments 

Widen shoulder – paved or 

other (includes add 

shoulder) 

2.07 Miles $317700 $776840 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Local Road or 

Street 

776 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207252 North 

Avenue from 26 Mile 

Road to Bordman 

Road 

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control 

Roadway signs (including 

post) - new or updated 

12.42 Miles $93577 $103974 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 8,000 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207253 95th Avenue 

from Eisenhower 

Road to 1 Mile Road 

and 150th Avenue 

from Buchannan 

Road to M-20 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

6.9 Miles $447444 $470260 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 1,200 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207257 F-97 from 

south of Clear Lake 

Ranch Road to north 

of Wolverine Drive 

Roadway Roadway widening - curve 2.63 Miles $183771 $218241 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 792 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

207258 Farrand 

Road at Colon Road 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify control – 

Compact/Mini-roundabout 

1 Intersections $292500 $329608 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 3,171 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 
Page 37 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

207259 Fawn River 

Road from west of 

Mill Pond Road 

(west junction) to 

east of Mill Pond 

Road (east junction) 

Shoulder 

treatments 

Widen shoulder – paved or 

other (includes add 

shoulder) 

1.36 Miles $288000 $372823 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 1,653 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

202885 Redfield 

Street between Fir 

Road and Brush 

Road, in Milton 

Township 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

1.01 Miles $26244 $35488 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 2,458 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

202886 Dailey Road 

between Pokagon 

Highway and 

Besson Street, in 

LaGrange Township 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

2 Miles $25272 $28129 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 2,657 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

203174 Downey 

Street between 

Indian Trail and Red 

Mill Road, in Silver 

Creek Township 

Roadside Removal of fixed objects 

(trees, poles, etc.) 

0.99 Miles $36558 $42913 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Local Road or 

Street 

413 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

203473 Monroe 

County guardrail 

Roadside Barrier- metal 4 Locations $243900 $266349 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 1,770 45 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

210236 Preliminary 

Engineering for 

Montcalm Area 

Career Center West 

Driveway to M-66 

Shoulder 

treatments 

Widen shoulder – paved or 

other (includes add 

shoulder) 

1.65 Miles $22585 $45170 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 3,294 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

200117 Preliminary 

Engineering for 

Evergreen Road 

segment and 8th 

Street/James Road 

at Coho Lane 

intersection 

Roadway 

delineation 

Roadway delineation -

other 

4.04 Miles $5500 $11000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 275 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Roadway 

Departure 

Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

209075 Preliminary 

Engineering for 

Colony Road at US127 

Intersection 

geometry 

Intersection geometry -

other 

2 Miles $25000 $50000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 650 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 

210245 Preliminary 

Engineering for CR 

612 at Crawford 

Lake Road 

Alignment Vertical alignment or 

elevation change 

0.95 Miles $33000 $66000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Major Collector 5,000 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 
Page 38 of 57 

 PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN 

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUT S 

OUTPUT 

TYPE 

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($) 

FUNDING 

CATEGORY 

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE 

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP 

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION 

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA 

SHSP 

STRATEGY 

 

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program 

210252 Preliminary 

Engineering for 

Waldo Road at 

Monroe Road 

Intersection 

traffic control 

Modify control – Modern 

Roundabout 

1 Intersections $37501 $75002 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148) 

Rural Multiple/Varies 3,027 55 County 

Highway 

Agency 

Spot Intersections Reduce 

Fatalities 

and Serious 

Injuries 
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 39 of 57

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five 

years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Fatalities 940 947 901 967 1,065 1,031 977 985 1,083

Serious Injuries 5,676 5,283 4,909 4,865 5,634 6,084 5,586 5,629 5,433

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

0.998 0.996 0.925 0.989 1.074 1.013 0.954 0.964 1.251

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

6.025 5.555 5.040 4.974 5.679 5.976 5.455 5.508 6.274

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

155 178 174 205 204 181 167 166 218

Number of nonmotorized serious 

injuries

533 568 517 556 536 617 573 628 524
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 40 of 57

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

Annual Fatalities

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.

Annual Serious Injuries
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 41 of 57

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 42 of 57

Describe fatality data source.

FARS

FARS data is used to calculate the 2022 performance targets and 2012 thru 2020 Fatality data. All other data 

included in the report uses Michigan's Statewide Crash database for reporting (Emphasis Areas, Road 

Classification, Road Ownership, etc)

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and 

ownership.

Year 2020

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Interstate

21.6 93.4 0.4 1.69

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

11.4 53.6 0.43 2.04

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other

53 223.4 1.27 5.34

Rural Minor Arterial 93.8 450.4 1.4 6.7

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Fatalities Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 43 of 57

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Minor Collector 13.6 75.2 1.58 8.69

Rural Major Collector 141.2 648.4 1.75 8.02

Rural Local Road or 

Street

77.6 1,183.4 3.47 57.22

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

76 391.6 0.45 2.29

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

31.2 172.2 0.51 2.77

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other

221.6 1,250 1.31 7.33

Urban Minor Arterial 133.53 1,033.8 1.08 6.71

Urban Minor Collector 1.6 5.6 1.6 5.63

Urban Major Collector 53.4 310 1.67 6.23

Urban Local Road or 

Street

60.4 421.8 0.85 5.88
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 44 of 57

Year 2019

Roadways Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

State Highway 

Agency

Non-Trunkline 

(County, City, Local 

Owned Roadways)

576.6 3,196.6 1.22 6.76

Trunkline (State 

Owned Roadways)

426.2 2,348.4 0.8 4.39

County Highway 

Agency

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City or Municipal 

Highway Agency

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority

Local Toll Authority

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, 

University)

Indian Tribe Nation

Trunkline (State 

Owned Roadways)

Non-Trunkline 

(County, City, Local 

Owned Roadways)
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 45 of 57

Provide additional discussion related to general highway safety trends.

In review of the 5-Year Rolling Average Statewide, state trunkline and local roadways, fatalities have seen an 

increase of 7.2 percent over the 5 year span. State trunkline fatalities had an overall increase of 8.3 percent 

while local roadway fatalities had an overall increase of 6.5 percent. 

Serious injuries statewide have seen an increase of 7.6 percent over the 5 year rolling average. State trunkline 

serious injuries had an overall increase of 8.5 percent while local roadway serious injuries had an overall 

increase of 7.3 percent. 

In regard to rates, the fatality and serious injury rates are lower on state trunkline than on local roadways. 

Overall, the fatality rate increased 9.9 percent while the serious injury rate decreased 3.5 percent. The state 

trunkline saw a 7.4 percent increase in the fatality rate and a 8.6 percent serious injury rate decrease. The 

local roadways saw a 11.9 percent fatality rate increase and a 1.4 percent serious injury rate increase. 

For both statewide and state trunkline the fatality rate has been at or below 1.10 fatality per 100 million vehicle 

miles traveled for 2012-2016 to 2016-2020. The local roadway fatality rate was at or below 1.27 during the 

entire analysis time period, while the state trunkine fatality rate was at or below 0.85 for the same time period.

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets

Calendar Year 2022 Targets *

Number of Fatalities:1065.2

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

To determine a forecasted value for the five-year rolling average for the first four measures, the decision was 

made to use the change model created by UMTRI used for establishing previous targets. UMTRI predicts 967 

fatalities in CY 2021, and 1065 in 2022. The change model predicts change in fatalities from the previous year 

based on several predictors. This log-change regression model is tied closely to whatever happened recently, 

so it cannot diverge very far from the current time unless we predict many years out into the future. In the 

future, the change model predicts a steady (slow) decrease in fatalities. The dataset is a set of differences from 

one year to the next within the state, expressed as a percentage of the previous year. Thus, the predictors can 

influence exposure and/or risk. The count model, however, directly predicts counts so it could diverge from 

observed by a lot if the patterns change in the real world. Based on known factors the count model shows a 

steady increase in fatalities through 2025. As this is not what is expected the change model was selected in 

developing the targets. This supports the SHSP by identifying Michigan's key safety needs and guide 

investment decisions to achieve significant reductions in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public 

roadways.

Number of Serious Injuries:5733.2

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The model predicts 5,409 serious injuries in CY 2021, and 5,673 in 2022. While serious injuries have fluctuated 

over the past several years, the linear relationship of the ratio of serious injuries and fatalities (A/K) going back 

to 2003 is still evident. However, this trend suggests a greater reduction in serious injuries than being 

observed. Therefore, a linear model using the last eight year of data was used which projects a flattening 
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 46 of 57

pattern. This supports the SHSP by identifying Michigan's key safety needs and guide investment decisions to 

achieve significant reductions in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roadways.

Fatality Rate:1.098

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

VMT values have been predicted for CYs 2020, 2021 and 2022. VMT estimates for CY 2020 are reduced due 

to COVID-19. Using the fatal injury values, along with the respective predicted VMT, the forecasted fatality 

rates are 0.945 for CY 2021, and 1.051 for CY 2022.This supports the SHSP by identifying Michigan's key 

safety needs and guide investment decisions to achieve significant reductions in traffic fatalities and serious 

injuries on public roadways.

Serious Injury Rate:5.892

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

VMT values have been predicted for CYs 2020, 2021 and 2022. VMT estimates for CY 2020 are reduced due 

to COVID-19. Using the fatal injury values, along with the respective predicted VMT, the forecasted serious 

injury rates are 5.287 for CY 2021, and 5.778 for CY 2022.This supports the SHSP by identifying Michigan's 

key safety needs and guide investment decisions to achieve significant reductions in traffic fatalities and 

serious injuries on public roadways.

Total Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries:791.6

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Results from the UMTRI model as described (the fatality and serious injury relationship) were also used to 

generate non-motorized forecasted annual values of 799 for CY 2021, and 762 for CY 2022.This supports the 

SHSP by identifying Michigan's key safety needs and guide investment decisions to achieve significant 

reductions in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roadways.

The annual forecasted values for CY 2021 and CY 2022 along with the actual values from CY 2018 to 2020 to 

determine the 2022 Targets (five-year rolling average) are shown in the table. In addition, actual values dating 

back to CY 2012 are included as part of the determination of the 2020 baseline condition.

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish 

safety performance targets. 

The Michigan DOT, the Michigan Office of Highway Safety Planning (OHSP), and the University of Michigan 

Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI) collaborated to establish the safety performance targets for 

Michigan. This collaboration included meetings with the analysis team along with input from MPO's and FHWA. 

The OSHP is a division under the Michigan State Police. The Director of OHSP serves as the chair to the 

Governor's Traffic Safety Advisory Commission (GTSAC) in Michigan.

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

N/A
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 47 of 57

Describe progress toward meeting the State’s 2020 Safety Performance Targets (based 

on data available at the time of reporting). For each target, include a discussion of any 

reasons for differences in the actual outcomes and targets.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES TARGETS ACTUALS

Number of Fatalities 999.4 1028.2

Number of Serious Injuries 5520.4 5673.2

Fatality Rate 0.970 1.051

Serious Injury Rate 5.340 5.778

Non-Motorized Fatalities and 

Serious Injuries

735.8 762.8

Based on Targets vs Actual, Michigan will preliminarily not meet any of the 5 performance targets for FY 2020. 

While FY 2020 total crashes were down 22% compared to FY 2012 fatalities were up 10%. The greatest 

impacts on the increase to fatalities were alcohol (+11%), drugs (+13%), young drivers (+6%), 

bicycle (+81%), motorcyclists (+25%), ORVs (+114%) pedestrian (+17%) and cell phone 

(+33%).

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

No

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries 65 

years of age and older for the past seven years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Fatalities

126 133 172 155 159 159 181

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Serious 

Injuries

434 393 506 558 509 574 464

Data has been updated with 2020 crash data information based on the State of Michigan Crash database.
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 48 of 57

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP?

• Other-Decrease of both fatal and serious injuries on a five-year rolling average

MDOT acknowledges the increasing trend of fatalities and serious injuries that are occurring on our roadway 

network. MDOT is focusing on projects that affect the roadway networks in large areas including:

• Non-infrastructure – training and workforce development, traffic studies, data analysis 

• Advance technology and ITS – ITS 

• Alignment – horizontal and vertical alignment 

• Interchange design – interchange improvements 

• Intersection geometry – auxiliary lanes, geometry improvements 

• Intersection traffic control – flasher install, conversion to roundabout, signal modernization, intersection 

upgrades

• Pedestrian and bicyclist – median and refuge areas, sidewalks, crosswalks, pedestrian signal 

improvements 

• Railroad grade crossings – widen crossing 

• Roadside – barrier install (cable, concrete, metal), drainage and grading improvements, roadside object 

removal 

• Roadway – access management, high friction pavement surface, roadway narrowing/widening, rumble 

strips

• Roadway delineation – delineators, pavement markings, retroreflectivity improvements 

• Roadway signs and traffic control – curve warning signs, signing upgrades and/or replacement 

• Shoulder treatments – shoulder paving, shoulder widening 

• Speed management – radar speed signs 

• Lighting – lighting improvements 

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of 

the State's program level evaluations.

MDOT plans on conducting a Trunkline before and after study evaluation for years 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 

in the next fiscal year. Any future before and after study will utilize the data-driven approach to safety decisions 

focusing on the Towards Zero Deaths initiative.

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and 

success of the Highway Safety Improvement Program?

• # RSAs completed

• Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process

• Increased focus on local road safety

• Other-Before and After Studies

• Other-Additional Systemic Treatments based on crash data

N/A
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 49 of 57

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures.

Year 2020

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Lane Departure Cross median, 

fixed object, side 

swipe, head-on, 

run off road

437.4 1,997.6 0.45 2.04

Intersections Intersections 314 2,159.6 0.32 2.2

Motorcyclists All 139 706.6 0.14 0.72

Work Zones All 18 73.2 0.02 0.07

Pedestrians and 

Bicyclists

All 189 579 0.19 0.59

Commercial Vehicles All 12.2 339.2 0.1 0.34

Impaired Drivers All 465.6 1,313.6 0.48 1.35

Younger Drivers All 269.2 1,811.6 0.28 1.85

Older Drivers All 227.4 1,022 0.23 1.04
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 50 of 57

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Fatalities

2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Serious Injuries

2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 51 of 57

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Fatality Rate

2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Serious Injury Rate

2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 52 of 57

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 

Describe any other aspects of HSIP effectiveness on which the State would like to elaborate.

In FY 2018 and 2019 MDOT installed sinusoidal mumble strips as a pilot project. Analysis of the functionality of the effectiveness of the installation was conducted during FY 2019 and 2020. Rumble strips are proving to be a cost-effective 

countermeasure to lane-departure crashes on Michigan’s state highways. A final analysis will be completed in FY 2021.
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 53 of 57

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative?

 11/07/2019

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP?

From: 2019 To: 2022

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update?

 2022

https://www.michigan.gov/documents/msp/SHSP_2019-2022_22_web_no_draft_678858_7.pdf

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

*Based on Functional Classification (MIRE 1.0 Element Number) [MIRE 2.0 Element Number]

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY SEGMENT Segment Identifier 

(12) [12]

100 100 100 100 100 100

Route Number (8) 

[8]

100

Route/Street Name 

(9) [9]

100 100

Federal Aid/Route 

Type (21) [21]

Rural/Urban 

Designation (20) [20]

100 100 100 100

Surface Type (23) 

[24]

100 100 100 15

Begin Point 

Segment Descriptor 

(10) [10]

100 100

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11) [11]

100 100

Segment Length 

(13) [13]

100 100

Direction of 

Inventory (18) [18]

Functional Class 

(19) [19]

100 100 100 100 100 100
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 54 of 57

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Median Type (54) 

[55]

80 95

Access Control (22) 

[23]

One/Two Way 

Operations (91) [93]

95 10

Number of Through 

Lanes (31) [32]

100 80 100

Average Annual 

Daily Traffic (79) [81]

100 95

AADT Year (80) [82] 100 95

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4) [4]

100 100 100

INTERSECTION Unique Junction 

Identifier (120) [110]

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Road 1 Crossing 

Point (122) [112]

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Road 2 Crossing 

Point (123) [113]

100 100

Intersection/Junction 

Geometry (126) 

[116]

Intersection/Junction 

Traffic Control (131) 

[131]

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road 

(79) [81]

100 95

AADT Year (80) [82]

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139) [129]

INTERCHANGE/RAMP Unique Interchange 

Identifier (178) [168]

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

100 100
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 55 of 57

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (197) [187]

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201) [191]

100 100

Ramp Length (187) 

[177]

100 100

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195) [185]

100

Roadway Type at 

End Ramp Terminal 

(199) [189]

100

Interchange Type 

(182) [172]

100 100

Ramp AADT (191) 

[181]

98 100

Year of Ramp AADT 

(192) [182]

98 100

Functional Class 

(19) [19]

100 100

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4) [4]

100 100

Totals (Average Percent Complete): 81.94 70.83 50.00 49.38 81.45 100.00 66.67 35.00 40.00 40.00

*Based on Functional Classification (MIRE 1.0 Element Number) [MIRE 2.0 Element Number]

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026.

MDOT is still continuing to collect the MIRE FDE data using the Roadsoft program updated by Michigan Technological University through 2022 and beyond. MDOT currently is on pace to have complete access to the MIRE FDE by 

September 30, 2026.
Page 56 of 57

2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Optional Attachments 

Program Structure:

Highway CFP Manual_June_2021.pdf

MDOT Safety Manual.pdf

Local Agency HSIP Manual_August 2019.pdf Project 

Implementation:

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

Compliance Assessment:
2021 Michigan Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 57 of 57

Glossary

5 year rolling average: means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data 

(e.g. annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area: means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process.

Highway safety improvement project: means strategies, activities and projects on a public road 

that are consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous 

road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem.

HMVMT: means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects: are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule: applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which 

data are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013.

Performance measure: means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to 

monitor changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and 

objectives.

Programmed funds: mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification: means the process by which streets and highways are 

grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP): means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on 

safety data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148.

Systematic: refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across 

a system.

Systemic safety improvement: means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high 

risk roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types.

Transfer: means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.