alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (h)(8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Financial Services Firm (“you” or “Intermediary”),

 

As principal underwriter of the DWS Funds, we (or a predecessor firm) or our affiliate have entered into a selling group or other agreement or agreements (the "Agreement") with you to permit you, as applicable, to sell, service, or facilitate trading in shares of the DWS Funds (collectively, the "Shares").  

 

This amendment to the Agreement is entered into as of the date indicated in the signature block below, with an effective date of October 16, 2007, or such earlier date as of which you begin providing the Shareholder information described below, and includes the following provisions: 

 

**1. Agreement to Provide Information.**Intermediary agrees to provide the Fund, upon written request, the taxpayer identification number (“TIN”), the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (“ITIN”), or other government-issued identifier (“GII”), if known, of any or all Shareholder(s) of the account and the amount, date, name or other identifier of any investment professional(s) associated with the Shareholder(s) or account (if known), and transaction type (purchase, redemption, transfer, or exchange) of every purchase, redemption, transfer, or exchange of Shares held through each account maintained by the Intermediary during the period covered by the request.

 

**2. Period Covered by Request.**Requests must set forth a specific period, not to exceed 90 days from the date of the request, for which transaction information is sought. The Fund may request transaction information older than 90 days from the date of the request as it deems necessary to investigate compliance with policies established by the Fund for the purpose of eliminating or reducing any dilution of the value of the outstanding shares issued by the Fund.

 

**3. Form and Timing of Response.**

 

(a)  Intermediary agrees to provide, promptly upon request of the Fund or its designee, the requested information specified in paragraph 1 above. If requested by the Fund or its designee, Intermediary agrees to use best efforts to determine promptly whether any specific person about whom it has received the identification and transaction information specified in paragraph 1 is itself a financial intermediary (“indirect intermediary”) and, upon further request of the Fund or its designee, promptly either (i) provide 

 

----
Case 1:05-cv-00244-MBC-SPB   Document 4   Filed 01/18/06   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2014-03-10T21:28:31-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
From: Richard Krock <rkrock@vinylinfo.org>

To: Jodi Howard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 09/21/2009 04:04 PM

Subject: RE: VI Support Information for September 28 Meeting with EPA

Dear Ms. Howard,

Please find attached our non-confidential submission of our PVC MACT

working group summary. I am resending all the block flow diagrams

consolidated into one workbook as well. Please accept my apology for

any delay this may have caused in getting the information communicated

within your organization prior to our September 28 meeting. Please do

not hesitate to contact me if any other questions or issues arise.

Thank you.

*Please note our new contact information*

Richard Krock

Technical Director

The Vinyl Institute

1737 King Street Suite 390

Alexandria, VA 22314

Direct: 571.970.3392

Mobile: 571.216.4474

Fax: 571.970.3271

Email: rkrock@vinylinfo.org

http://www.vinylinfo.org

http://www.vinylindesign.com

(Embedded image moved to file: pic29063.jpg)VI Logo

From: Richard Krock

Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 3:43 PM

To: 'Howard.Jodi@epamail.epa.gov'

Subject: VI Support Information for September 28 Meeting with EPA

Dear Ms. Howard,

As we discussed, The Vinyl Institute held a working group meeting

this week to identify common issues that are involved in

completing the PVC MACT 114 Request. The attached letter

articulates our discussions, concerns, and proposals. We would

like to review this letter and the two attached block flow

diagrams and attached test setup sketch in detail at our planned

meeting from 1:00 to 3:00 pm on September 28, 2009. Attendees

from The Vinyl Institute membership at the meeting will be: Mary

Bachynsky (Formosa), Barry Christensen (OxyChem), Kevin Bloomer

(Westlake), Mark Garza (ShinTech), Otis Sistrunk (PolyOne) and

Rich Krock (Vinyl Institute). We understand that you will also

have a conference call line available for some of the members who

will not be able to physically attend. Please forward that

information to me and I will send it out to our members. We

appreciate the opportunity to meet with you and your colleagues

and look forward to our discussion. In the meantime, please do

not hesitate to contact me with any questions or comments. Thank

you.(See attached file: VI PVC MACT STack Resin Testing Block Flow

Diagram and Method 316 sketch 9-17-09.xls)(See attached file: EPA

PVC MACT Testing VI Work Group Proposal 9-21-09.pdf)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from this Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         116,491
<SECURITIES>                                    50,349
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,180
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,049
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,736
<PP&E>                                          10,394
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,207
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,158
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,720
<CGS>                                           30,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,390
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,431)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (47,431)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,431)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.39)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              750
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                       (750)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
#### Hoyt GORDON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50136.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 1, 1978.

Roy Pitts, Meridian, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Henry T. Wingate, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lauderdale County; Lester F. Williamson, Judge.

Before INZER, P. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concurring.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49722-49723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33452]


Brownsville & Rio Grande International Railroad--Lease and 
Operation Exemption--Union Pacific Railroad Company

    Brownsville & Rio Grande International Railroad, a Class III rail 
carrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 
to lease and operate a total of approximately 7.92 miles of rail line 
(known as the Port Lead) owned by Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) 
between milepost 0.0 at Brownsville, TX (from the Port Lead connection 
with UPRR's rail yard in downtown Brownsville) and milepost 7.92 at the 
Port of Brownsville, TX. The transaction was expected to be consummated 
on or after September 8, 1997.

[[Page 49723]]

    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33452, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001 and served on: Robert A. Wimbish, Rea, Cross 
& Auchincloss, 1920 N Street, Suite 420, N.W., Washington, DC 20036.

    Decided: September 15, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.

Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25238 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Recommendedshipbuilding construction guidelines for cruise vessels destined to call onU.S. ports**
 
1997 | 2001
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.7502:C 74/
Item Number:0494-L-06 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001079928
 
September 13, 2018
#### TRANSOCEAN CONTRACTORS, INC. v. BRUCE BOAT RENTAL, INC.

No. 62156.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Transocean Contractors, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to *646the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Terrebonne.

Writ denied.

DIXON, J., would grant the writ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 336 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 336

To designate the Staten Island Unit of the Gateway National Recreation 
           Area as the ``Senator James L. Buckley Seashore''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2023

 Mr. Sullivan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Staten Island Unit of the Gateway National Recreation 
           Area as the ``Senator James L. Buckley Seashore''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Senator James L. Buckley Seashore 
Designation Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF SENATOR JAMES L. BUCKLEY SEASHORE.

    (a) Designation.--The Staten Island Unit of the Gateway National 
Recreation Area described in subsection (a)(4) of the first section of 
Public Law 92-592 (16 U.S.C. 460cc) is designated as the ``Senator 
James L. Buckley Seashore''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
record, or other paper of the United States to the unit of the Gateway 
National Recreation Area described in subsection (a) shall be 
considered to be a reference to the ``Senator James L. Buckley 
Seashore''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Hilda Petitjean LeBLANC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Antoinette DAVIS and Travelers Indemnity Company, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3504.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 13, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 16, 1971.

J. Minos Simon and John Rixie Mouton, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellant.

Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, by J. J. Davidson, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY, and HOOD JJ-

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This suit is a sequel to LeBlanc v. Davis and Travelers Indemnity Company, 213 So.2d 185, La.App.3rd Cir., 1968, and 254 *79La. 439, 223 So.2d 862 (1969). This suit, as originally filed and as now before us, is a suit by an insured against his own liability insurer for personal injuries under the uninsured motorists provision of the insurance contract. Plaintiff has appealed from an adverse judgment. We affirm.

This court and the Supreme Court in the above cases held that the plaintiff, having failed to comply with a provision in the insurance contract requiring the insured to furnish medical reports to the insurer breached the terms of the contract. The Supreme Court affirmed this court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s action as a non-suit. We are now called upon to decide whether the insured is precluded from pursuing a subsequent suit, being identical in every respect except that the insured furnished the required medical reports.

A judgment of non-suit is never res judicata. Coleman v. Forsythe, 137 La. 1092, 69 So. 849 (1915); McCook v. Comegys, 169 La. 312, 125 So. 134 (1929); McCook v. Comegys, 169 La. 701, 125 So. 860 (1929); McWilliams v. Harper, 159 So. 454, La.App.2nd Cir., 1935.

A rule gathering eminence in our jurisprudence, termed “the law of the case”, has been argued as the proper rule to apply in this case. Keller v. Thompson, 134 So.2d 395, La.App.3rd Cir., 1961; Murphy v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 165 So.2d 497, La.App.2nd Cir., 1964. However, we do not think that that principle is applicable as this case is one based on contract, and the contract itself is the law of the case. By failing to comply with the provision of the contract, plaintiff breached a provision with which he obligated himself to comply; a law which he was a party in making.

 Both this court and the Supreme Court held that the breach by the plaintiff was a deliberate violation of a condition precedent; a condition precedent to a claim for benefits under the provisions of the contract. Our earlier decisions merely held that the breach was of such a nature that plaintiff was precluded from seeking judicial enforcement of her claim. To bring a suit on a contract, a party must show substantial compliance with its terms. Lundy v. S. Pfeifer & Co., 162 La. 355, 110 So. 556 (1926). Plaintiff failed in the first instance; hence, her suit was dismissed as a non-suit. By now offering to comply with the terms of the contract, plaintiff cannot erase the prior breach.

For the foregoing reasons, the decision is affirmed. Plaintiff-appellant to pay the costs.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remedent USA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2003 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  we, Robin
List,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  and  Stephen  F. Ross,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




        /S/ ROBIN LIST                          /S/ STEPHEN F. ROSS
        -----------------------                 -----------------------
        Robin List                              Stephen F. Ross
        Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer
        November 24, 2004                       November 24, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SS. 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Technest Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company do hereby certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| **/s/ Shekhar Wadekar**

 

**/s/  Bruce Warwick**

**Shekhar Wadekar**

 

**Bruce Warwick**

**Chief Executive Officer **

 

**Principal Financial Officer**

**Date: February 16, 2012**

 

**Date: February 16, 2012** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EX 32.2



SECRETARY TREASURERS CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on the Form 10-QSB/A of The Bralorne Mining Company (the Company) for the period ended May 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Lucien R. Paquette, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



1.    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.     The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.







/s/ Lucien R. Paquette



Lucien R. Paquette



Chief Financial Officer

Chief Accounting Officer

Secretary Treasurer and Director



Date:  June 9, 2004
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 2007 - Present

No definition found. Both fields # of Fatal Injuries (pg18) and NON-MOTORIST DATA: Date of 

Death (pg137) contains reference to the fatal definition. Date of Death reads "Indicates the 

date of death of an individual who died at the scene or within 30 days of being injured in a 

crash, as a result of those injuries."

WV Uniform Traffic Crash Report Student 

Manual 2007

A: Incapacitating Injury A Injury severe enough to require individual to be immediately transported from the scene. 

Injuries include bleeding wounds, distorted members, etc. Injury/Injury Status Code codes & definitions found on pg112,130. 

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE STATE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 2007 - Present WV Uniform Traffic Crash Report Student 

Manual 2007

Pedestrian 05 No definition found. Person Type code found on Manual pg128

Other Pedestrian (Wheelchair, 

skater, etc.) 06 No definition found. Person Type code found on Manual pg128

Pedalcyclist 2007 - Present

Bicyclist 07 No definition found. Person Type code found on Manual pg128

Other Cyclist 08 No definition found. Person Type code found on Manual pg128

West Virginia