U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

79–942 2013

JOINT HEARING TO RECEIVE LEGISLATIVE PRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE VETERAN SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS (VSOs) 

JOINT HEARING 

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS 

BEFORE THE

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AND THE

U.S. SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION 

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 6, 2013 

Serial No. 113–7 

Printed for the use of the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

( 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

ii 

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS 

JEFF MILLER, Florida, Chairman 

DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado 

GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida 

DAVID P. ROE, Tennessee 

BILL FLORES, Texas 

JEFF DENHAM, California 

JON RUNYAN, New Jersey 

DAN BENISHEK, Michigan 

TIM HUELSKAMP, Kansas 

MARK E. AMODEI, Nevada 

MIKE COFFMAN, Colorado 

BRAD R. WENSTRUP, Ohio 

PAUL COOK, California 

JACKIE WALORSKI, Indiana 

MICHAEL H. MICHAUD, Maine, Ranking 

Minority Member 

CORRINE BROWN, Florida 

MARK TAKANO, California 

JULIA BROWNLEY, California 

DINA TITUS, Nevada 

ANN KIRKPATRICK, Arizona 

RAUL RUIZ, California 

GLORIA NEGRETE MCLEOD, California 

ANN M. KUSTER, New Hampshire 

BETO O’ROURKE, Texas 

TIMOTHY J. WALZ, Minnesota 

HELEN W. TOLAR, Staff Director and Chief Counsel 

U.S. SENATE, 

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS 

BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont, Chairman 

JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia 

PATTY MURRAY, Washington 

SHERROD BROWN, Ohio 

JON TESTER, Montana 

MARK BEGICH, Alaska 

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut 

MAZIE HIRONO, Hawaii 

RICHARD BURR, North Carolina, Ranking 

Minority Member 

JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia 

MIKE JOHANNS, Nebraska 

JERRY MORAN, Kansas 

JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas 

DEAN HELLER, Nevada 

STEVE ROBINSON, Staff Director 

LUPE WISSEL, Republican Staff Director 

Pursuant to clause 2(e)(4) of Rule XI of the Rules of the House, public hearing records 

of the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs are also published in electronic form. The printed 

hearing record remains the official version. Because electronic submissions are used to 

prepare both printed and electronic versions of the hearing record, the process of converting 

between various electronic formats may introduce unintentional errors or omissions. Such occurrences are inherent in the current publication process and should diminish as the process 

is further refined. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

iii 

C O N T E N T S 

March 6, 2013 

Page 

Joint Hearing To Receive Legislative Presentation of Multiple Veteran Service 

Organizations (VSOs) .......................................................................................... 1 

OPENING STATEMENTS 

Chairman Jeff Miller, U.S. House of Representatives .......................................... 1 

Prepared Statement of Chairman Miller ........................................................ 31 

Senator Bernard Sanders, Chairman, U.S. Senate, Committee on Veterans’ 

Affairs .................................................................................................................... 2 

Hon. Michael H. Michaud, Ranking Minority Member, U.S. House of Representatives ........................................................................................................... 4 

Prepared Statement of Hon. Michael H. Michaud ......................................... 32 

Senator John Boozman, U.S. Senate ...................................................................... 29 

WITNESSES 

Cleve Geer, National Commander, AMVETS ........................................................ 5 

Prepared Statement of Mr. Geer ..................................................................... 32 

John R. ‘‘Doc’’ McCauslin, CEO, Air Force Sergeants Association ...................... 8 

Prepared Statement of Mr. McCauslin ........................................................... 39 

Bill Lawson, President, Paralyzed Veterans of America ...................................... 10 

Prepared Statement of Mr. Lawson ................................................................ 50 

Sheldon Ohren, National Commander, Jewish War Veterans ............................. 12 

Prepared Statement of Mr. Ohren .................................................................. 57 

Vivianne Cisneros Wersel, Au.D, Gold Star Wives ............................................... 14 

Prepared Statement of Mrs. Wersel ................................................................ 67 

Mark A. Kilgore, National President, Fleet Reserve Association ........................ 16 

Prepared Statement of Mr. Kilgore ................................................................. 71 

John Rowan, National President, Vietnam Veterans of America ........................ 18 

Prepared Statement of Mr. Rowan ................................................................. 81 

Clyde Marsh, President, National Association of State Directors of Veterans 

Affairs .................................................................................................................... 20 

Prepared Statement of Mr. Marsh .................................................................. 89 

MG Gus Hargett, President, National Guard Association of the United States 21 

Prepared Statement of Mr. Hargett ................................................................ 94 

MATERIALS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD 

Anthony A. Wallis, Legislative Director/Director of Government Affairs, Association of the United States Navy ...................................................................... 97 

LTG Guy C. Swan, USA Ret., Vice President, Association of the United 

States Army .......................................................................................................... 108 

Joseph A. Vater, Jr., Esq. (PA), President, ADBC Memorial Society ................. 111 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

(1) 

JOINT HEARING TO RECEIVE LEGISLATIVE 

PRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE VETERAN 

SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS (VSOs) 

Wednesday, March 6, 2013 

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 

AND U.S. SENATE, 

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS, 

Washington, D.C. 

The Committees met, pursuant to notice, at 10:01 a.m., in Room 

345, Cannon House Office Building, Hon. Jeff Miller, [Chairman of 

the Committee] presiding. 

Present from House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs: Representatives Miller, Bilirakis, Coffman, Cook, Michaud, Brownley, Ruiz, 

McLeod, O’Rourke, and Walz. 

Present from Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs: Senators 

Sanders, and Boozman. 

OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN JEFF MILLER 

The CHAIRMAN. This hearing will come to order. 

Good morning, everybody. Thank you for making the trip in. We 

appreciate you being here today. 

It is my distinct privilege to welcome you to the joint hearing of 

both the House and the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees to receive presentation on the legislative agendas of AMVETS, the Air 

Force Sergeants Association, Paralyzed Veterans of America, Jewish War Veterans, Gold Star Wives, the Fleet Reserve, Vietnam 

Veterans of America, the National Association of State Directors of 

Veterans Affairs, and the National Guard Association of the United 

States. 

I think, everybody, that these groups represent what is truly 

great about the veteran community. The veterans and their families, no matter what generation, branch of service, or weather that 

may be out there, will continue to tend to the needs of their fellow 

Americans who have served. 

We are joined today here by Chairman Sanders, Ranking Member Michaud, and I believe Mr. Boozman will be here momentarily. 

I did see him earlier this morning. We have Committee Members 

from both sides of the House and the Senate. 

In the interest of time and the tradition in keeping with the tradition of this joint hearing, I would say that myself and the Senator as well as the Ranking Members will give opening statements 

and then we will ask all other Members if they would waive their 

statements for the record. 

Of course, there is always an opportunity to add those statements into the testimony today. Hearing no objection, so ordered. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

2 

I want to welcome the members of each organization’s auxiliary 

and thank you so much for your hard work in front and behind the 

scenes of your organization. We appreciate your service to our 

country and your service to your fellow veterans. 

I would like to ask if there is anybody here from Florida. If you 

are here from Florida—I know one, two, three. This is not snow, 

is it? You guys, this is nothing. You thought it was going to be 

something. We are glad to have all of you here with us today. On 

behalf of all your neighbors in the sunshine state, I want to thank 

you for your service and your sacrifice. 

These Committees with your help worked hard in the 112th Congress to ensure that the commitment America has made to its veterans remains strong. And, again, in the 113th Congress, we will 

look to you and your organizations to help address the problems 

facing America’s veterans. 

Together we reduced veteran unemployment and created new 

programs aimed at providing veterans 21st century job skills. We 

have vigilantly conducted oversight into all areas of the Department of Veterans Affairs in order to keep our veterans safe and to 

maximize the care that they receive. 

And in these difficult fiscal times, there is no excuse for the 

waste of funds that have been allocated to taking care of America’s 

veterans. 

While these Committees have worked hard to ensure that the sequester does not impact VA, we must continue to work to ensure 

that our Nation’s veterans receive the care that they deserve and 

the care that they have earned. 

Given the uncertain budget process, Ranking Member Michaud 

and I introduced H.R. 813, Putting Veterans’ Funding First Act of 

2013. This bill will require Congress to fully fund the Department 

of Veterans Affairs’ discretionary budget a year ahead of schedule, 

ensuring that all VA services will have timely and predictable 

funding. 

While every one of your organizations has a unique set of legislative priorities, you also share a common goal, one that we on these 

Committees share with you, and that is providing nothing short of 

the best for our veterans, their families, and their survivors who 

have shared in their sacrifice. 

In times like these, the work of organizations like yours has 

never been more important. And, again, I say thank you. 

I now yield five minutes to my friend and colleague from the 

Senate, Chairman Bernie Sanders, for his opening statement. 

[THE PREPARED STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN MILLER APPEARS IN THE

APPENDIX]

OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR BERNARD SANDERS 

Senator SANDERS. Chairman, thank you very much. 

And let me thank all of you who are here and thank you, not 

only for your service to our country and your sacrifices that you 

and your families made, but also the important role that your organizations are playing in helping us understand what the problems 

are out there so that we can address them. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

3 

No matter how well intentioned we may be, and I think we have 

two very good Committees here, we cannot do our jobs unless we 

are continuously in touch from you and getting feedback from you 

because you are on the ground and your people are accessing services and know what the problems are. 

So thanks for being here and we continue to look forward to 

working with you. 

I think we all recognize that the VA does a lot of things well. It 

is easy to criticize, but they also do a lot of things well. In terms 

of patient satisfaction year after year, actually the VA is at the 

very top of the list in terms of how folks feel about the quality of 

health care that they are getting. 

I think a lot of that has to do with the very fine staff that we 

have all over this country providing services to our veterans. And 

many of those staff, of course, are veterans themselves. 

One of the issues that I am working hard on deals with budgetary matters. Chairman Miller raised appropriate enough our concern to make sure that the VA remains adequately funded now and 

into the future. 

There is an immediate concern that I want to mention to you and 

that is the so-called chained CPI. Some of you may be aware of it. 

Some of you may not. It is a theory being postulated, adopted by 

a number of people here in Congress, that says that the benefits 

that disabled veterans are getting have been too generous historically and that includes people on Social Security as well. 

The result if that so-called chained CPI were to go into effect 

would mean that veterans who started receiving VA disability benefits at age 30 would have their benefits reduced by $1,425 at age 

45, $2,300 at age 55, and $3,200 at age 65. 

That is the reality. It does not get a lot of discussion. It is kind 

of an inside the beltway process. I hope that you will join me and 

many others in saying we do not balance the budget on the backs 

of disabled veterans. 

In general, there are a number of other issues that are out there. 

The claims backlog remains a very, very serious issue. We are 

going to be doing a hearing on this next week. 

The good news is that the VA is now actually processing a lot 

more claims than they used to. People do not know this. The bad 

news is that they are not keeping up with the claims that are coming in. A lot of that has to do with opening up the doors, appropriately so, for more people, Agent Orange and so forth. 

So we want the doors to remain open. We want veterans to be 

able to get the benefits to which they are entitled, but obviously, 

obviously, we need the VA to expedite their transformation process, 

their IT system so that in a timely way, veterans are getting all 

of the benefits that they are entitled to. 

Another issue out there that we will be working on is the tragedy 

of the high rate of suicides within the veterans’ community. It is 

a complicated issue. I do not think anyone knows the magic answer. I do not think there is a magic bullet out there, but we have 

got to address this issue in a serious way and we intend to do that. 

Not unrelated to that, as you all know, is the very serious problems our young men and women are having coming back from Afghanistan and Iraq with PTSD and TBI, again very serious probVACREP180 with DISTILLER

4 

lems that the VA is making an intelligent effort to go forward, but 

we need to do more with that. 

One of my passions ever since I was in the House from Vermont 

is the issue of outreach. And that has to do with the fact that no 

matter how good a program may be, it is not any good at all if a 

veteran does not know about that program. And I suspect that 

there are millions of veterans out there who do not know about the 

benefits to which they are entitled and the services which they can 

access. 

One of the transformations in the military in recent years has 

been the fact that more and more women are now in the military. 

More and more women are now veterans. How do we make sure 

that we take care of the specific health care and other needs of 

women veterans? That is an issue that we are going to work on 

and that deals also with the issue of sexual trauma, et cetera, et 

cetera. 

So there is a lot on our table. And I believe that in a time of political contentiousness, and you all know what is going on here in 

Washington, I believe you are going to see these two Committees, 

the Committee in the House and the Committee in the Senate, 

work intelligently in a nonpartisan way to address the very, very 

serious issues facing our veterans. 

And we look forward to working with you and we thank you 

again so much for your contributions to our country. 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

The CHAIRMAN. Now, the Ranking Member of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Mike Michaud. 

Mike. 

OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. MICHAEL MICHAUD 

Mr. MICHAUD. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. 

I welcome all the members and leadership of the Veteran Service 

Organizations attending today’s joint hearing. I appreciate your 

coming here today. It is great to see so many important organizations here and I look forward to hearing your testimony. 

Our Nation has a ‘‘sacred trust’’ with all veterans and their families, a national promise to care for and stand up for those who have 

served and sacrificed, the VSOs represented here today help to ensure that the most important issues facing America’s veterans and 

their families remain at the center of the national stage. You fulfill 

a vital role in the ‘‘community of support’’ America provides our national heroes. I appreciate that very much. 

Mr. Chairman, in order so we can get all the testimony in before 

the votes today, I would ask unanimous consent that the remainder 

of my remarks be entered into the record. 

The CHAIRMAN. Without objection. 

Mr. MICHAUD. Thank you. 

[THE PREPARED STATEMENT OF HON. MICHAEL MICHAUD APPEARS

IN THE APPENDIX ---???]

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much. 

The CHAIRMAN. And when Senator Boozman comes, I will ask 

him if he would do the same. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

5 

The Senate has votes at 10:30 and the House is going to have 

votes at 11:00 or 11:30, but we will continue with the hearing. 

I want to first welcome everybody to the table this morning. The 

first witness that we are going to hear from, and I will introduce 

everybody and then we will proceed down, and my order may be 

a little bit out, but if you would just proceed afterwards, Cleve 

Geer, National Commander of AMVETS. 

Thank you, sir. 

Chief Master Sergeant, retired, United States Air Force, Doc 

McCauslin, Chief Executive Officer of the Air Force Sergeants Association. 

Doc, good to see you, sir. 

Bill Lawson, President of the Paralyzed Veterans of America. 

This is where we may have a little bit of a flip. Next is the Commander Sheldon Ohren of the Jewish War Veterans. 

Sir, welcome. 

Next we will hear from Dr. Vivianne Wersel of the Gold Star 

Wives. Next we would like to extend a special welcome to Mark 

Kilgore, National President of the Fleet Reserve Association. Mr. 

Kilgore is a resident of Pensacola which is in my district in the 

panhandle of Florida. 

Started off by saying go Seminoles this morning. I am a Florida 

Gator, so I have cut your time in half. 

Then we will hear from John Rowan, National President of Vietnam Veterans of America, then retired U.S. Navy Rear Admiral 

Clyde Marsh, President of the National Association of State Directors of Veterans Affairs, and then finally we will hear from Gus 

Hargett, Major General Gus Hargett, President of the National 

Guard Association of the United States. 

Thank you all for being with us today. 

And, Commander Geer, you are recognized for five minutes with 

your testimony. 

STATEMENTS OF CLEVE GEER, NATIONAL COMMANDER, 

AMVETS; JOHN R. ‘‘DOC’’ MCCAUSLIN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AIR FORCE SERGEANTS ASSOCIATION; BILL LAWSON, 

PRESIDENT, PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA; SHELDON 

OHREN, NATIONAL COMMANDER, JEWISH WAR VETERANS; 

VIVIANNE CISNEROS WERSEL, GOLD STAR WIVES; MARK A. 

KILGORE, NATIONAL PRESIDENT, FLEET RESERVE ASSOCIATION; JOHN ROWAN, NATIONAL PRESIDENT, VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA; W. CLYDE MARSH, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE DIRECTORS OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS; GUS HARGETT, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL GUARD ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES 

STATEMENT OF CLEVE GEER 

Mr. GEER. Thank you. 

Distinguished Committee Members, as the national commander 

of AMVETS, I am honored to share our concerns and comments on 

the issues under the purview of your Committees. 

Before I continue with my remarks, I would like to introduce the 

national president of the Ladies Auxiliary, Leslie Wunderle. But 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

6 

due to the weather conditions, she could not be here this morning. 

And I wish to thank you, Leslie. 

As the fourth largest veteran service organization in the country, 

as well as one of the authors of the Independent Budget, AMVETS 

has a proud history of assisting veterans and advocating for veterans’ rights and benefits. 

Since 1944, AMVETS has been at the forefront of a public policy 

related to military and veteran issues and national defense. 

Today, with more than a decade of continuous war behind us, 

horrific budget cuts just beginning to be implemented, and the fiscal uncertainty on the horizon, our men and women in uniform 

have remained steadfast in their mission to defend this great Nation. 

This dedication and sacrifice must never be forgotten and the 

promises made to this Nation’s heroes must be fully and faithfully 

honored. 

Our servicemembers and veterans do not deserve to be asked to 

continue making sacrifices. They do not deserve excuses or broken 

promises. They deserve nothing less than this Nation’s full support. 

They have done the hard work on behalf of all Americans. Now is 

the time for all Americans to relieve them of their heavy burdens. 

Without the benefit of a draft, this extended period of war will 

leave behind a legacy of unmatched damage to the physical and 

mental well-being of our men and women in uniform. 

Like the bombed out cathedrals left behind after World War II, 

we need to ensure that our veterans are carefully supported while 

they are vulnerable and rebuild, returning to their full strength 

under the auspices of the VA. 

Today’s military and veterans’ communities are faced with many 

challenges and AMVETS is dedicated to aggressively attacking 

these issues on behalf of American veterans everywhere including 

veterans’ unemployment, VA/DoD health care and mental health, 

veterans’ benefits, women veterans and servicemembers, national 

guard and reserve servicemembers, homeless and rural veterans, 

POW, MIA recovery and identification and mortuary affairs. 

The problem of veteran unemployment should be seen as a national disgrace and veterans of every era are being negatively impacted by this ever-growing situation. 

In recognition of those who honorably fought to maintain the 

freedoms of those who stayed behind, we as a Nation cannot do 

enough to ensure that American veterans get the proper skills, certification, and education to be more competitive and successful in 

the civilian job market. 

AMVETS is fighting to ensure that veterans are not unfairly 

treated by employers, landlords, or educational institutions due to 

the often erroneous misconception that all veterans are dealing 

with the negative effects of mental or physical health issues will 

not fit into their corporate culture, do not have the necessary skills 

and experience to do the job. 

This issue of negative stereotyping is creating an unnecessary 

burden on our veterans and is also proving to be a significant barrier to employment. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

7 

One of the chief responsibilities of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs, VA is providing primary specialty, physical, mental health 

care to American veterans. 

AMVETS calls on Congress and the Administration to ensure 

that VA health care programs are fully funded in a timely manner 

so that all eligible veterans are able to receive the medical services 

they are entitled to. 

Thanks to a decade plus dominated by American military actions 

in Iraq and Afghanistan, a new generation of veterans have become 

eligible for a wide range of Federal benefits. Securing those benefits should not involve a nightmare of red tape, inefficiency, confusion, or frustrations. 

We need to find ways to cut through the bureaucratic inertia and 

to strengthen efficiencies through coordination and stimulation on 

eliminating waste and redundancy across department and agency 

lines. 

AMVETS believes in the promise made to our military members 

and veterans when they agreed to leave their homes and families 

to go fight in our stead. It is crucial that veterans’ benefits become 

a national priority and they must be viewed in the context of the 

service and sacrifices performed by our men and women in uniform. 

Among the most crucial issues facing women veterans today are 

homelessness, military sexual trauma, MST, and the lack of gender 

specific health care. These three issues are the factors of humiliation and deprivation for women veterans. 

How can we as a Nation allow some of our most vulnerable veterans, many of whom also have children, to be living on the streets 

of our cities? It is not right that a woman should have to fear for 

her personal safety and not only from foreign enemies but from her 

comrades in arms simply because she made a conscious decision to 

serve in the military. 

AMVETS fully supports H.R. 679, the Honor America’s Guard 

and Reserve Retirees Act, introduced for the third year in a row 

by Representative Walz which would grant veteran status for national guard and reserve members with 20 years or more in service. 

This cost-neutral bill would not restore any new or unearned 

benefits. It will simply provide—I understand my time is about 

gone. I appreciate being able to come before you this morning and 

I appreciate being here. Thank you. 

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, sir. And your complete statement 

will be entered into the record. But if you just have a few more 

comments, you are welcome to finish. 

Mr. GEER. I thank you for your time this morning and the consideration you have given us to come before you to express our 

views and I ask for your continuous support of our veterans. Thank 

you. 

[THE PREPARED STATEMENT OF CLEVE GEER APPEARS IN THE APPENDIX]

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, sir, very much. 

Doc. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

8 

STATEMENT OF JOHN R. ‘‘DOC’’ MCCAUSLIN 

Sergeant MCCAUSLIN. Chairman Sanders, Chairman Miller, and 

Members of these Committees, good morning. On behalf of our 

110,000 plus members of the Air Force Sergeants Association, I 

thank you for this opportunity to offer our views on the fiscal year 

2014 priorities for the VA. 

Addressing that budget, the Administration has not yet submitted its budget request, so, therefore, we cannot comment on the 

proposal at this time. However, I want to make it clear that AFSA 

concurs with the funding levels recommended by the Independent 

Budget. We are particularly grateful with the recent establishment of advanced appropriations authority for VA health care funding. We 

strongly support legislation introduced by Chairman Miller and 

Ranking Member Michaud to fully fund the discretionary budget of 

the VA a year in advance. 

H.R. 813 would make it easier for the VA to plan for their key 

investments and ensure that funding for veterans’ programs do not 

become a casualty of the legislative paralysis we have seen here in 

Washington lately. 

Regarding sequestration, like our partner associations represented here today, we are very concerned how this policy will affect the availability of veterans’ benefits. We were relieved with 

OMB’s announcement that the VA’s budget is exempt from sequestration, but it may take time to fully realize the true impact of 

their programs. 

The Administration cannot say with absolute certainty that veterans’ benefits will not be affected because many of VA’s efforts are 

closely tied to those of other Federal agencies who are subject to 

that sequestration. 

For instance, cuts to the Department of Housing and Urban Development could result in a reduction of vouchers that are used to 

house homeless veterans. Secretary Shinseki and the VA have 

made tremendous progress in lowering the number of homeless veterans on our streets, so let’s not undermine those efforts. 

Regarding the integrated electronic health record, we, too, were 

very disappointed with DoD and VA’s recent decision to abandon 

an integrated electronic health record and retain their respective 

systems, and they wasted $1 billion of taxpayers’ money. 

The issue of suicide is a challenging issue facing the VA. We 

were very grateful for Congress to include suicide prevention and 

resilience provisions in the fiscal year 2013 NDAA. 

We also thank Senator Patty Murray for her tireless efforts on 

this issue. 

However, the provisions in that Mental Healthcare ACCESS Act 

of 2012 which were adopted for the DoD were not considered for 

the VA health system and nor has action been taken to fix this. 

The subject of women veterans is noteworthy. We applaud the 

Committees for championing women veteran issues in past years. 

However, the unique health care of women veterans must be addressed to ensure that VA program developments match that shifting demographic. 

The disability claims and backlog is still with us. When I addressed your Committees last March, there were 1.4 million total 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

9 

claims pending. Today that figure is closer to two million. More 

money and people certainly did not fix that issue. 

To their credit, VA processed over one million claims last year, 

but it has been unable to catch up with the rising demand. 

AFSA supports a comprehensive, integrated strategy for improving the claims management system with primary emphasis on 

quality decisions at the initial stage of their process to save reworks and delay. 

As a biostatistician, I know the VA can certainly do better. 

Each of our 50 states has a state veterans’ home and their program has proven itself to be the most cost-effective source of highquality and long-term health care services for veterans that need 

skilled nursing, domiciliary, adult day health care, and other specialized programs. The cost of providing care at these facilities is 

roughly half of what it costs our VA. 

Last year, the Committees were instrumental in passing legislation by Ranking Member Michaud and Chairman Miller that allowed the VA to enter into programs with state homes. We believe 

that additional savings can be achieved by allowing similar reimbursement of adult day health care services. I recommend your 

Committees look into this further and get the VA to publish their 

regulation that has taken them nearly four years to date without 

a release. 

Speaking on veterans’ preference, we need a common-sense approach to our current veterans’ preference point system. Wounded 

warriors aside, if a military member stood before you this morning 

without an arm as a result of their military service, why in heaven’s name do they need to fill out the paperwork to prove they are 

a disabled vet and get their ten points’ preference? Surely there is 

a better way. How about concurrent receipt? 

Thanks to Congressman Gus Bilirakis for his continued persistence in this area to compensate all eligible disabled veterans. 

Who is a veteran? AFSA supports full veteran status for reserve 

component members with 20 years or more service who do not 

quality for veteran status under current law. 

The House passed H.R. 1025 which was introduced by Representative Tim Walz last year, but the Senate failed to move forward on 

Senator Mark Pryor’s companion bill, S.491. Representative Walz 

has already reintroduced his legislation as H.R. 679. Passing it will 

not cost a penny. It simply bestows upon them the honorarium of 

being called a veteran. 

We applaud the recent passage of legislation that authorizes the 

restoration of the veterans’ cemetery at the former Clark Air Base 

in the Philippines and places it under the care of the American 

Battlefields Monuments Commission. 

I want to personally thank Chairman Miller and Congressman 

Bilirakis for visiting the Clark Cemetery recently to help get it up 

to American standards of dignity. 

Related to taking care of military retirees and their survivors, we 

want to thank Congressman Joe Wilson for his H.R. 32 with 70 cosponsors, for his legislation to repeal the SBP/DIC offset. I am told 

Senator Nelson plans to introduce a Senate companion version very 

soon. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

10 

Last, but not least, a proposal called the chained CPI has been 

floated in Congress to change how the consumer price index is calculated. If adopted, it would result in significant cuts for payments 

to our senior citizens, military retirees, disabled veterans, and their 

survivors. 

I thank you personally, Chairman Sanders, for leading strong opposition to this unconscionable plan. 

Chairman Sanders, Chairman Miller, thanks again for this opportunity. We sincerely believe that the work of the House and 

Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee is among the most important. 

On behalf of AFSA members, we appreciate your efforts and, as 

always, we are ready to support you in matters of mutual concern. 

[THE PREPARED STATEMENT OF JOHN R. MCCAUSLIN APPEARS IN

THE APPENDIX]

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much, Doc. 

Also, for the record, Mr. Michaud and Mr. Walz were both with 

Congressman Bilirakis and I at the cemetery at Clark as well. 

Mr. Ohren, are you next or Mr. Lawson? I do not know which 

one of you wants to go next, but—— 

Mr. LAWSON. Sir, the reason for the flipflop was because there 

is—— 

The CHAIRMAN. Got you. Who wants to go next? 

Mr. LAWSON. —the leg. I could not get up to the table, so, anyway—— 

The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Lawson, you are recognized. 

Mr. LAWSON. I will go. Thank you, sir. 

STATEMENT OF BILL LAWSON 

Mr. LAWSON. Chairman Miller, Chairman Sanders, and Members 

of the Committees, I appreciate the opportunity to present the legislative priorities for 2013 of the Paralyzed Veterans of America. 

It is important to note that funding issues and ongoing concerns 

with the claims process generally supersede lesser issues. That 

being said, I will limit my remarks today to some specific issues 

that impact Paralyzed Veterans’ members. 

We have developed long-standing partnerships with other veteran service organizations and are proud to have recently released 

the 27th edition of the Independent Budget. 

For details on funding recommendations for VA funding and specifically for veterans’ health care, I would encourage you and your 

staffs to review the fiscal year 2014 Independent Budget. 

We cannot emphasize enough the importance of ensuring that 

sufficient, timely, and predictable funding is provided to the VA. 

We anxiously await the budget submission to be released by the 

Administration that will include funding recommendations for VA 

programs for fiscal year 2014 and the advanced appropriations for 

fiscal year 2015. 

Once again this year, Congress failed to fully complete the appropriations process, instead choosing to fund the Federal government 

through a six-month continuing resolution. This business as usual 

for funding the Federal government is simply unacceptable. 

For two fiscal years in a row, the Administration’s recommended 

funding levels were not changed in any appreciable way and ConVACREP180 with DISTILLER

11 

gress simply signed off on those recommendations without thorough analysis. 

As Congress completes work on appropriations for this year, I 

cannot emphasize enough that sufficient funding must be provided 

for VA programs. 

The VA specialized services are incomparable resources that 

often cannot be duplicated in the private sector. However, these 

services are often expensive and are severely threatened by costcutting measures and the drive toward achieving management efficiencies. 

Paralyzed Veterans strongly believe that VA remains the best option for veterans seeking health care services. Specialized services 

such as spinal cord injury care which our members require are part 

of the core mission and responsibility of the VA. 

These services were initially developed to care for the unique 

health care needs of veterans. The provision of specialized services 

is vital to maintaining the viability of a VA health care system. 

With growing pressure to allow veterans to seek care outside of 

the VA, the VA faces the distinct possibility that the critical mass 

of patients needed to keep all services viable could significantly decline. If primary care services decline, then specialized care will be 

diminished. 

Paralyzed Veterans is very concerned with the recent changes 

that have been made to the VA prosthetics and sensory aid services. These changes have resulted in delayed delivery of prosthetic 

devices, diminishing of quality service delivery for disabled veterans, and prolonged hospital stays for veterans waiting for prosthetic equipment. 

We have heard complaints from many of our members who have 

been negatively impacted by this change. One paralyzed veteran 

was forced to spend nearly a month longer in the hospital just because he had to wait for approval for some adaptive housing modifications. Leaving him in the hospital put him at higher risk for 

contracting other illnesses. We just cannot accept that. 

It is time for Congress or Committees to take an active role in 

the oversight of these prosthetic changes. Some VISNs are trying 

to make these changes work to best benefit veterans through a 

local initiative and freelancing. 

It should be troubling to everyone here that there is not a national standard in place to ensure that this program works the way 

it is supposed to work. 

In the end, many of the concerns that I have raised reflect the 

belief that this is not one VA. While our ears hear one VA, our eyes 

and our experiences show us 21 individual VA systems 

masquerading as veterans integrated service networks or better 

known as VISNs. 

The VISN model of health care was intended to create strategic 

alliances among VA medical centers, clinics, and other sites, sharing agreements with other government providers and other such 

relationships. 

Instead we see VISNs being run like autonomous entities in a 

fragmented system with inconsistent policies and budgetary turf 

battles that leave many veterans faced with delayed or denied access to care and prosthetic items. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

12 

In fact, Paralyzed Veterans’ service officers had to intervene 

when one of our members, a 94-year-old paralyzed marine who 

fought in World War II, endured a longer inpatient stay because 

two VISNs could not decide which VISN would pay for the Hoyer 

lift and commode chair that he needed to live independently. 

In the one VA world, it is not his burden. But in this real instance, he was the unfortunate one caught in the middle of two 

independently operating VISNs, thus defying any notion of there 

being one VA. 

On balance, VA is fortunate to have good people who will adhere 

to the principles that veterans come before cost considerations and 

policies. Even in times of national economic difficulty and profound 

organizational transformation, our Nation’s security is still preserved by the men and women who take the oath and believe in 

the country’s promise to care for him or her should they suffer injury or disease. 

But until we have 21 VISNs that operate with a common purpose, under common policies, variability between VISNs will create 

even more gaps in which the most vulnerable veterans will fall. We 

hear one VA. We would like to see one VA. 

Chairman Miller, Chairman Sanders, I would like to thank you 

once again for the opportunity to testify today, and I would be 

happy to answer any questions you may have. 

[THE PREPARED STATEMENT OF BILL LAWSON APPEARS IN THE APPENDIX]

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much, Mr. Lawson. 

Senator Sanders apologizes, but they have called a vote over on 

the Senate side. So he asked that I please pass his apologies on to 

the witnesses here. 

Mr. Ohren, you are recognized for your testimony, sir. 

STATEMENT OF SHELDON OHREN 

Mr. OHREN. Thank you. 

Chairman Sanders, Chairman Miller, and Members of the Senate 

and House Committees on Veterans’ Affairs, my fellow veterans, 

and friends, I am Sheldon Ohren, the National Commander of the 

Jewish War Veterans. 

Senator Sanders, it was a singular honor for JWV to present our 

prestigious JWV Medal of Merit to you at our congressional reception during our days on Capitol Hill. It was equally rewarding to 

JWV to have so many distinguished guests participate with us. 

Mr. Chairmen, on Friday, March 15th, we at JWV will celebrate 

our 117th birthday. For all of these 117 years, JWV has advocated 

a strong national defense and just and fair recognition and compensation for veterans. 

The Jewish War Veterans represents a proud tradition of patriotism and service to the United States of America. 

Now I would just like to enter in maybe a definition of a veteran. 

It might be stated as follows: A veteran is someone who at one 

point in his or her life wrote a blank check and made it payable 

to the United States of America for an amount up to and including 

my life. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

13 

Also, George Washington said at one time the willingness with 

which our young people are likely to serve in any war no matter 

how justified may be directly proportional to how they perceive veterans of early wars were treated and appreciated by our Nation. 

The Military Coalition, JWV continues to be a proud member 

and active participant of the Military Coalition. Past National 

Commander Robert Zweiman, JWV’s National Chairman, serves on 

the Board of Directors of the Military Coalition and, again, our Executive Director, Colonel Herb Rosenbleeth, army retired, continues 

to serve as the President of the Military Coalition and co-chair of 

the coalition’s Membership and Nomination Committee. 

The Veterans Affairs Department claims backlog recently edged 

above the 900,000 mark with 608,365, that is 67.6 percent, stuck 

in the system more than 125 days. The VA reported that total disability claims hit 900,121 as of December 24th, 2012. That is up 

24,725, 2.7 percent from the backlog that existed at the start of the 

calendar year on January 3rd, 2012. 

America’s veterans need to have more confidence in the work 

done by the VA. 

Blind veterans are of extra concern to JWV. The large number 

of IED explosions in Iraq and Afghanistan have led to a huge number of eye injuries and blinded veterans. In fact, orbital blasts, 

globe injuries, optic nerve injuries, and retinal injuries have been 

all too common. JWV strongly urges Congress to ensure adequate 

funding to care for thousands of veterans with eye injuries. 

JWV applauds the VA for processing nearly 230,000 claims during June 2012 that involve the three newest Agent Orange related 

conditions. The recent expansion of conditions presumed to be 

linked to Agent Orange exposure certainly created additional work 

for VA which already faces a heavy claims backlog. 

But VA Secretary Eric Shinseki argued correctly that it was the 

right thing to do. Decisions about treating and compensating veterans exposed to deadly toxins must never be motivated by whether or not the road will be challenging or costly, but whether or not 

the veteran has suffered and requires treatment because of the exposure. 

JWV strongly supports the establishment of a unified policy to 

deal with the consequences of exposure to hazardous materials in 

the military. 

VA has promised to devote resources necessary to end veterans’ 

homelessness by 2015. To formally implement that pledge, VA is 

going to have to work closely with Congress to continue making responsible investments in affordable housing and supportive service 

programs to help veterans and their families. 

Current estimates put the number of homeless veterans at approximately 76,000 on any given night down from the 2011 numbers of 131,000 or more. 

JWV recommends providing funding for a broad range of appropriate and effective interventions including appropriation of funds 

for supportive services for veterans’ families programs. Supportive 

SSVF funds have been used effectively by community organizations 

to prevent many veterans from becoming homeless and to quickly 

assist veterans who need nothing more than short-term rental assistance and limited case management to get back on their feet. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

14 

SSVF funds can also be used for employment services, utility assistance, child care costs, and other housing related expenses. 

Congressional support for the homeless veterans grant and per 

diem transitional housing program, this program provides shortterm housing help to homeless veterans allowing them to get connected with jobs, support services, and more permanent housing, 

ultimately allowing them to become self-sufficient. 

Promising new models for using grant and per diem funds and 

allowing veterans to remain in our GPD housing units once support 

from the program ends and new programs focused on women veterans to help ensure that GPD continues to meet the ever-changing 

needs of returning veterans and their families. 

Congress should provide 10,000 new HUD–VASH vouchers designed to serve homeless veterans and many of their families who 

need long-term housing, intensive care, management and supportive services. 

Since 2008, 37,975 vouchers have been awarded contributing 

substantially to major reductions in veteran homelessness. 

Chairman Sanders, Chairman Miller, our great Nation must care 

for its veterans. Our country must therefore pay for the costs involved. 

At our national conventions, our members work diligently to develop our legislative priorities. Our dedicated resolutions chairman, 

Past National Commander Michael Berman, works very diligently 

to develop our resolutions and to bring them before our convention 

delegates. 

Following further fine tuning by our convention delegates, our 

resolutions are finalized and become our legislative priorities for 

the coming year. 

We thank you for the opportunity to present them today. Thank 

you again. 

[THE PREPARED STATEMENT OF SHELDON OHREN APPEARS IN THE

APPENDIX]

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much, sir. 

Dr. Wersel. 

STATEMENT OF VIVIANNE CISNEROS WERSEL 

Ms. WERSEL. The willingness of America’s veterans to sacrifice 

for our country has earned them our lasting gratitude, a quote by 

Congressman Jeff Miller. 

Chairman Miller, Members of the Committees, thank you for the 

opportunity to testify on behalf of Gold Star Wives of America. 

I am Vivianne Wersel, the widow of Lieutenant Colonel Rich 

Wersel, United States Marine Corps, who died suddenly in 2005, 

a week after returning from his second tour of duty in Iraq. 

The issue that affects all our members is the dependency and indemnity compensation, otherwise known as the DIC. The DIC is 

paid to the survivors of servicemembers and veterans for their 

early death on active duty or as a result of a service-connected 

cause, payment based on rank. 

Later Congress changed the rank base to a flat rate. Today this 

calculation of DIC is approximately 43 percent of the VA disability 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

15 

compensation received by veterans rated with a 100 percent disability. 

Survivor benefits for other Federal programs use a different 

standard of measurement, 50 percent, not 43 percent. 

GSW seeks clarity by using 50 percent of the 100 percent disabled veterans compensation to calculate the DIC benefit. 

Our second legislative issue is the removal of the DIC dollar-fordollar offset of the survivor benefit plan, SBP. We have been told 

that this Committee would have some jurisdiction with this issue 

because Section 5304 in Title 38 needs to be deleted or changed if 

SBP is restored to DIC recipients. 

H.R. 32, the Military Surviving Spouse Equity Act, if enacted 

will remove the dollar-for-dollar offset and would allow a surviving 

spouse to receive both SBP and DIC. The SBP and DIC are two different benefit programs for different purposes paid by different government departments. 

For this example, I am going to use a visual. This is for the majority of our members. If a surviving spouse is eligible for both the 

DIC and the SBP, there is a dollar-for-dollar offset. So the SBP 

completely goes away and all she has is her DIC. 

However, if the surviving spouse has that offset and she is 57 

years old or older and she remarries, she receives her DIC and her 

SBP. All she has to do is remarry to receive her SBP. Why should 

we have to remarry to receive our benefits? 

Please refer to our testimony because we have other beneficiary 

classifications and Jeannette Panini’s excellent article from USA 

Today. 

In 2004, Congress allowed concurrent receipt for 100 percent disabled retirees. Our husbands were 100 percent disabled and death 

should not negate concurrent receipt for both benefits. We should 

be allowed to receive benefits they earned. 

In 2007, the Veterans Disability Benefit Commission recommended that surviving spouses of military servicemembers be 

allowed concurrent receipt of full SBP and DIC. 

GSW’s third legislative agenda is improvements of Chapter 35 

education benefits. The cost of college education has increased substantially in recent years. Chapter 35 benefits do not come close to 

covering the cost of tuition, books, fees, and living expenses. 

Most Federal education programs have had recent increases and 

changes, but Chapter 35 education benefits have been increased 

only by COLAs. 

Recent proposed legislation requires states to provide in-state 

tuition rates for veterans using Federal education benefits. Surviving spouses and dependents of Chapter 35 education benefits 

are not included in this legislation. 

It is the fiduciary responsibility of Congress to ensure that all 

categories of veterans’ education benefits are spent wisely and such 

protections should be extended to all VA education chapters. 

GSW recommends other issues to be addressed such as the 

deferment of the tuition until the student receives payment of the 

education benefit as well as allowing all surviving spouses an unlimited time to use their education benefit. 

Year after year, Members of this Committee have championed 

the well-being of the deceased veteran’s family and GSW is grateful 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

16 

for your leadership. We ask you to make us a priority to find funding for legislative issues we have been told are deemed fixable as 

soon as money is found. 

Our issues are veterans’ issues. Because there is the deceased 

veteran who earned the benefit as a 100 percent disabled veteran, 

that should not disqualify his survivors from concurrent receipt of 

the benefits he earned. 

Our military heroes cannot be here today to ask you why, why 

the benefits they earned or paid for are not recognized, honored, 

and fulfilled along with their fellow comrades who are 100 percent 

disabled. Our spouses died because of their willingness to sacrifice 

for their country, but the widows should not have to lead the battle 

for equity. 

I would like to thank Senator Burr for introducing Gold Star 

Wives Day, to make it possible for April 5th to be Gold Star Wives 

Day. 

And I thank the Committee for allowing me to testify today and 

I am here to answer any questions. 

[THE PREPARED STATEMENT OF VIVIANNE WERSEL APPEARS IN THE

APPENDIX]

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much. 

Mr. Kilgore, you are recognized. 

STATEMENT OF MARK A. KILGORE 

Mr. KILGORE. Chairman Miller, Representative Michaud, and 

Members of both Committees, good morning and thank you for the 

opportunity to share FRA’s views on veterans’ issues. 

First and foremost, our shipmates are concerned about the impact of sequestration on VA programs and the outlook for future 

VA budgets. 

Our thank you to Chairman Miller and former Chairwoman Murray for ensuring that many of the VA benefits and programs have 

been protected from budget cuts associated with mandatory spending reductions. 

With that in mind, advanced funding for VA health care programs must continue and other VA programs must also be protected from future automatic cuts. 

The growing VA claims backlog continues to be a major concern 

for our members. Even with significant additional resources, as of 

last month, there are nearly 900,000 disability claims pending with 

70 percent of those pending 125 days or longer and 317,000 of 

those are first-time claims. 

The Recovering Warrior Task Force believes that the 66,000 returning troops from Afghanistan coupled with the downsizing of 

the military will overwhelm the claims systems causing a tsunami 

of new claims resulting in more delays and more challenges. 

As I speak, there are hundreds of active duty personnel throughout the world standing at xerox machines making copies of their 

medical records to submit to the VA. That is time lost, paper wasted. 

The integrated electronic health record project offered great 

promise. However, it was recently announced that the program is 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

17 

being downgraded due to budget pressures and higher costs. This 

is not good. 

FRA shares concern about this change to a promising program 

that could improve care to our veterans and help advance the goal 

of a truly seamless transition from DoD to the VA. 

I am here today to put a face on this concern. I am both a VA 

priority group 1 and a TRICARE prime user. In Pensacola, thanks 

to Chairman Miller, the two facilities are collocated and share 

treatment of active duty and veterans alike. However, they do not 

share access to the health records. 

Following my annual VA physical at the end of December 2011, 

I was diagnosed with bladder cancer. Actually, it was a year ago 

today. Knowing the availability of immediate access to the Navy 

hospital, I went there. They provided me great treatment. 

After my recovery, I made a follow-up VA appointment to get 

paper copies of my six months worth of treatment and my VA doctor spent 25 minutes of my 30-minute appointment speaking about 

the need for electronic medical records as the VA now would have 

to scan my records into their computers. 

This past December, I was privileged to be in Hawaii to commemorate the 61st anniversary of the Pearl Harbor attack. Unfortunately, I was admitted to Tripler Army Medical Center with a 

perforated colon. 

My treatment was exemplary and made even better by the fact 

that the Army was able to access my health record at Naval Hospital Pensacola which prevented an unnecessary and very serious 

surgery they initially wanted to perform. 

One concern during my entire treatment process was being continually asked about being on Medicare. When I told my doctors no, 

they all said good. I realize the Doc Fix Reimbursement Rate program is not under your jurisdiction. However, I wanted you to 

know that that is a real concern outside the beltway. 

So much for me. Another priority issue is expanding presumption 

for blue water veterans exposed to Agent Orange during the Vietnam War. We urge support for legislation addressing this issue. 

We strongly support joint DoD/VA efforts to invest in research to 

improve diagnosis and treatment of both post-traumatic stress and 

traumatic brain injury. 

Our other issues are addressed in our complete statement including authorization of Medicare subvention for VA, suicide prevention, improving care for women veterans, and restarting priority 

group 8 veteran enrollment. 

Thank you again for braving this bad weather for the opportunity to offer recommendations and thank you for your efforts on 

behalf of our veterans and all you do every day. I am pleased to 

answer questions. 

[THE PREPARED STATEMENT OF MARK A. KILGORE APPEARS IN THE

APPENDIX]

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much. 

Mr. Rowan. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

18 

STATEMENT OF JOHN ROWAN 

Mr. ROWAN. Good morning. Chairman Miller, Ranking Member 

Michaud, and Members of the Committees, particularly the new 

Members, we welcome you to this wonderful Committee and to the 

work that they do on behalf of veterans. 

I would right off the bat like to tell Senator Sanders who unfortunately had to leave that we have gone on record in opposition to 

the chained CPI proposal. 

This is now my eighth year of testimony before these Committees. Unlike some of my colleagues, I get to hang around for a 

while. 

The claims issue obviously everybody talks about and we know 

the backlog and the problems about it. 

We are a little bit optimistic with the implementation of the Veterans Benefits Management System, particularly with its open architecture and the fact that they actually are talking to the users. 

On a weekly basis, they are talking to the folks in the field who 

actually use this thing and are making patches both weekly and on 

monthly updates. And the system seems to be hopefully getting 

better. 

One thing that has not been talked about very much, although 

it was mentioned by, I believe, one of my colleagues, is the nonrating items. The simple clerical addition of adding a spouse or a 

child to your benefits so that you can get the extra dollars that 

comes along with dependents seems to take forever. 

I mean, my director of veterans’ benefits who is a 100 percent 

disabled veteran had a baby seven months ago and immediately obviously applied for adding the dependent. They still have yet to get 

that straightened out. That is taking way too long. 

The area of mental health, obviously there are all kinds of issues 

going on with that, that we are very concerned about. One of the 

things that concerns us, however, is the management within the 

VA. There are three management positions, two of which are already vacant and one that is about to be vacant. 

The chief consultant for mental health, the VET center chief 

have retired, both of them, and Matt Friedman, the Director of the 

National Center for PTSD, is leaving soon. 

We are concerned that the VSOs need to be consulted about their 

replacements and that the VA should create a search committee involving the veteran service organizations. 

And we are asking the Senate and House for a four-corners letter 

to the VA to open up the recruitment for these positions. If VA does 

not do so, we ask the Congress to pass a law mandating this. The 

VA needs to listen to the VSOs on mental health issues. 

With regards to suicides, we are all appalled at the suicide rate 

inside the military. However, most people do not realize it is us 

older veterans who are committing suicide. Seventy percent of the 

veterans, 70.3 percent of the veterans who commit suicide are over 

the age of 50. That is us, the Vietnam era and older, frankly. Even 

the really older veterans unfortunately are still committing suicide. 

So while the VA obviously has to focus on what is going on with 

the younger veterans returning and dealing with their PTSD and 

other issues, they need to talk about the older veterans as well, 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

19 

many of whom PTSD is now coming back to haunt them now that 

they have retired. 

We also are coming out with a new program this year to deal 

with the toxic legacy not only of Vietnam but even of the present 

day. We are proposing a new law called the Veterans Family Prevention, Health, Maintenance, and Research Act of 2013 and we 

are hoping to get some sponsors for it. 

Among the many things that we would hope to see included in 

this, obviously the whole issue of the medical records and the 

health records. We think, frankly, that the DoD should just adopt 

VistA and get it over with and stop wasting money and time. 

We need a database registry within the Veterans Health Administration like Hep C the registry to talk about all the different toxic 

exposures not only here but stateside as well. I mean, we have seen 

the problems with many of the bases in the United States who 

have all kinds of issues going on, not the least of which is Camp 

Lejeune. 

A national center for the treatment of health conditions suffered 

by the progeny of veterans exposed to toxic substance and an advisory committee to oversee that, and an office of extramural research. We need more research, period, on all of the exposures. 

I talked to somebody once about all of the issues regarding Agent 

Orange and what it really boiled down to is occupational medicine. 

If somebody told you I was a coal miner, they would say, fine, let’s 

check out your lungs. 

Well, if I tell you I am a Vietnam veteran, they should check out 

a whole lot more than just my lungs. And if you are a new veteran 

coming back from Iraq and Afghanistan, they need all kinds of 

things checked out as well. And, again, we think an advisory committee to oversee doing that. 

And also, the idea of a coordinated national education and outreach campaign for all veterans to tell them what is going on with 

them, what they have been exposed to, and what they are entitled 

to by the VA. 

And just an aside issue on that, spina bifida is the only disease 

of children that the VA has accepted as being Agent Orange related. They were guaranteed by the VA in official testimony in 

front of your Committees that the children of Vietnam vets with 

spina bifida would receive all kinds of custodial care. The VA has 

reneged on that and we think they should be held accountable for 

that. 

And as an aside, frankly, we are urging everybody to be sworn 

under oath. I am willing to swear and you will take all my testimony under oath. And I think the VA should be asked to do the 

same and maybe sometimes we will not get this conflicting testimony. 

Last, but not least, is the issue of accountability. We have 

thrown millions at the VA, billions, and that is fine. They need it. 

But now they need to be held accountable for what it is they are 

doing with all those billions. 

And it was interesting my colleague who talked about the issue 

of VistA and their little fiefdoms out there. That whole reorganization may need to be revisited. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

20 

And I look forward to answering any questions you may have. 

Obviously my written testimony contains a significant amount of 

more issues than these. Thank you. 

[THE PREPARED STATEMENT OF JOHN ROWAN APPEARS IN THE APPENDIX]

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much. 

Admiral Marsh. 

STATEMENT OF W. CLYDE MARSH 

Admiral MARSH. Chairman Miller, Chairman Sanders, distinguished Members of the Committee, as president of the National 

Association of State Directors, I am honored to present comments 

on their behalf. 

We are the second largest provider of services to veterans and 

our rolls continue to grow. Collectively, states contribute more than 

$6 billion each year in support of our Nation’s veterans and their 

family members even in the face of constrained budgets. 

We are serving a new generation of veterans from a decade of 

war who must receive medical care, establishment of benefits, special assistance transitioning to civilian life after honorable service. 

Full funding support from Congress will provide resources to address VA’s three major areas of emphasis, access to VA, eliminating the backlogs and claims processing, and establishing or at 

least eliminating homelessness among our veterans. 

NASDVA strongly supports increased efforts for outreach to veterans. Many areas of our country are still under-served. NASDVA 

urges the implementation of a grant program that will allow VA to 

partner with the states to perform outreach at the local level and 

development of a comprehensive database. 

NASDVA supports the recommendation of the Veterans Benefits 

Disability Commission to update the VA rating schedule, realign 

DoD and VA process for rating disabilities, and develop new criteria specific to rating post-traumatic stress disorder. 

We applaud the efforts of VA to address particular issues of 

health care for women veterans, military sexual trauma, and veterans residing in rural areas. Future health care funding is crucial 

to expand outreach and access to include telehealth, telehome 

health, and telemedicine. 

We shared a concern about the mental health of service personnel and veterans, especially the number of suicides and longterm effects of PTSD. 

We appreciate the proactive steps such as suicide hotline and addressing the underlying causes for suicide. However, more still 

needs to be done since suicide rates exceed current combat casualties. 

NASDVA recommends an in-depth evaluation of long-term care 

and mental health services to include gap analysis, identifying 

where services are lacking. Future studies should include consultation with state directors. 

NASDVA recommends a greater role for state VA and overall efforts to manage and administer claims processing. Collectively, we 

have the capacity and capability to assist the Veterans Benefits Administration. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

21 

Access to VBA data systems and uniform paperless claims software will enhance service officer integration in the delivery of benefits and services to veterans. 

NASDVA strongly supports VBA’s development of the electronics 

claim processing system. 

We continue to be concerned that the census does not count veterans or disabled veterans other than through the America’s Community Survey which is only a ten-percent sample of the population and not a hard count. We urge Congress to mandate counting veterans in the next census. 

With the important passage of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, the mission 

of state approving agencies were expanded with more compliance 

requirements, but no additional resources were provided. 

We are in agreement with the veteran service organizations’ support of the distinguished Warfare Medal, but the order of precedent 

should not be above the Bronze Star Medal or the Purple Heart. We recommend that the fiscal year 2014 budget proposal of $46 

million for state cemetery grants programs be increased to at least 

$50 million to address the pending construction grants. 

As partners with the VA, we are focusing on addressing the multiple causes of veterans’ homelessness such as medical issues both 

mental and physical, legal issues, limited job skills and work history. 

It is vital to continue the partnership with the community organizations to provide transitional housing and VA partnership with 

public housing authorities to provide permanent housing for veterans and their families. 

Currently, the Bureau of Justice Assistance in conjunction with 

the National Drug Court Institute offers orientation and training 

grants to jurisdictions interested in establishing veteran treatment 

courts. A good example of grant funding is Alabama’s establishment of 12 veteran treatment courts. 

State directors respectfully request support for increased multiyear funding to the Bureau of Justice Assistance so that more jurisdictions can participate in veteran treatment courts. 

Regarding the chained CPI, if it reduces disability payments, affects retirement and elders, NASDVA does not support it. 

Mr. Chairman, thank you for the important work that your Committee is doing to improve support for our Nation’s veterans and 

thank you for allowing us to participate in these important hearings. 

[THE PREPARED STATEMENT OF W. CLYDE MARSH APPEARS IN THE

APPENDIX]

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, sir. 

General Hargett. 

STATEMENT OF GUS HARGETT 

General HARGETT. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you for the 

opportunity to be here today to testify on behalf of our members. 

First, I would like to testify in support of H.R. 679 sponsored by 

Congressman Tim Walz which provides recognition to all members 

of the guard and reserve who have honorably served for 20 years 

and more and who draw a retirement as a retired military person. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

22 

This group which swore an oath to our country through no fault 

of their own has written the government a blank check to send 

them anywhere in the world to defend our country. But because 

they were not called to active duty under Title 10 status, they are 

not allowed to call themselves veterans. 

They have performed duty in Title 32 status and Title 10 status 

around the world including domestic emergencies, overseas deployment training, guarding the borders, the airports. But because this 

time was not recognized under Title 10 for other than training, 

they are not considered veterans. 

You know, I would like to offer a little email that I got from a 

veteran the other day who was a retired one star general who 

served 35 years in the guard and reserve. And his email was something to the effect that he went to a Veterans Day parade and he 

was not allowed to stand as a veteran because he was never mobilized. 

But, yet, a young specialist who he had ordered to active duty 

in Vietnam, because he was AWOL from the national guard and 

because he was ordered to active duty, he was able to stand as a 

veteran. 

This legislation is cost free. It does not cost anybody anything. 

It has been passed by the House unanimously for two years in a 

row. I urge all of you to pass this bill. Let’s pass it through the 

Senate and all the Houses and honor those who have written this 

Nation a blank check. 

The other thing I would like to ask this Committee to look at is 

the guard disability benefit claim denial rate. Guard claims are denied at four times the rate of active duty members. I suspect there 

are many reasons for this. I think some of them have been addressed here today because of lack of understanding amongst our 

guardsmen. 

I know when I retired, I asked AMVETS to come and help me 

and I was able to learn a lot that I did not know about what we 

had to do to qualify for retired benefits. 

So I would like to ask this Committee to try to figure out why 

guardsmen and reservists’ denial rate is four times that of active 

duty members. 

Like all other veteran service organizations here today, we are 

also concerned about the impact of sequestration. I think it will 

have adverse effects on all of our veterans, our veteran service organizations, and the ability to treat all of our veterans in a manner 

that I think we owe to all of them. 

Mr. Chairman, I thank you for the opportunity to come today 

and testify on behalf of all of our members of the National Guard 

Association. I urge all of you to continue to support our veterans 

and our active members. Subject to your questions, thank you. 

[THE PREPARED STATEMENT OF GUS HARGETT APPEARS IN THE APPENDIX]

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much. 

Again, thank you all for your testimony. 

Mr. Lawson, if I can come back to you, and it has been referenced a couple of times in other testimony the fact that, I think 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

23 

you said that the VISN model had devolved into 21 autonomous entities. 

If they were to do away with the VISN framework, how would 

you foresee them being able to manage what they do? 

Mr. LAWSON. Well, I am not actually saying they need to do away 

with that model, Congressman. What I am saying is that they all 

need to operate under the same policies. Each VISN operates separately under their own policies and budgets. 

An example, I am going to use myself, I get my primary care in 

Oklahoma City VA Hospital. I get my specialized care in the Dallas 

VA because they have a spinal cord injury center there. 

The wheelchair that I am sitting in was issued to me by Dallas. 

When I was in Oklahoma City and I needed some new front wheels 

for this chair, I was told from Oklahoma City we cannot issue that 

to you. You will have to go back to Dallas. 

I do not understand why. I mean, it is one VA. Let’s just pay for 

what is needed and the two VISN directors can fight over it later 

on as far as who is going to pay for that. 

I believe that the VA budget is one budget, but it just does not 

make sense that to cross VISN lines, you have to re-register. If I 

go to another VA that is in a different VISN, I have got to re-register with that VA if I have to get some care there. 

In actuality, the VISN that Oklahoma City is in, I am supposed 

to go to Houston to the spinal cord injury center because that is 

the VISN and that is the budgetary boundaries and all this. 

But I thought to myself why should I drive through Dallas that 

has an SCI center, then bypass San Antonio that has an SCI center 

to go to Houston that has got an SCI center. It does not make 

sense. 

If we could revise this to where we operate under all the same 

policies, I think it would greatly help. 

The CHAIRMAN. Thanks. 

Doc, you had said in your testimony that VA needs to pursue 

new ways to deliver mental health services. I would like to know 

your opinion. What areas outside of the standard box does VA need 

to be exploring for provision of mental health services? 

As we all know, it is growing at an alarming rate with all those 

returning home and new veterans entering into the system. The 

suicide rates that we see, VA is trying to keep up with the problem. 

But unfortunately with mental health issues, a backlog is not acceptable. 

Sergeant MCCAUSLIN. Yes, sir. I think the first thing we need to 

do is look at some outsourcing because they simply do not have the 

resources, the technicians and the specialists. And so they have 

been overwhelmed. 

And so if you are inclined to need that service, you call and there 

is a backlog. You know, they will talk to you on the phone, but in 

order to get in to get an appointment, there is a tremendous backlog. They just do not simply have the resources. 

So it is time to start looking at outsourcing where those specialties are throughout the country by region. And the same thing 

goes, as I mentioned earlier, on the domiciliary care, the adult 

health care for the state veterans’ home. Same thing. They do a 

better job than the VA and these people are not taking a bed overVACREP180 with DISTILLER

24 

night. They are coming in one, two, three days at the max a week 

for their care and they go back home. 

So we need that agreement between the VA and the state veterans’ homes to provide the same thing. 

The CHAIRMAN. Thanks. 

Mr. Michaud. 

Mr. MICHAUD. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. 

My first question is similar to the Chairman to Mr. Lawson. 

I liked your comment about one VA which I believe strongly and 

not only within the VISN but the silos between VBA, VHA, cemetery is great as well and looking at how can we not just talk about 

one VA, but actually have one VA. Appreciate your comments. 

Have you given any thought at your organization about restructuring VA? 

We just came back from a CODEL (sic) where I know in the Philippines, they have someone in charge in the region and you have 

got VHA, VBA, cemetery. They report to that person in charge and 

it seems to be working extremely well. I think that would also help 

the secretary, administer his policies down to the different regions. 

Have you given any thought about that? 

Mr. LAWSON. Well, personally I have. You know, before they developed these veteran integrated service networks, I believe the VA 

was basically broken down into four regions. I do not see why that 

had to be changed. It seemed like it was working well. 

When they developed the VISN concept, what it was supposed to 

do is establish an office in certain areas to where they could build 

relationships amongst other VA medical centers and all that. 

And actually, I believe that personnel that were going to be required for this was very minimal, but today it is a big bureaucracy 

at every one of those VISNs. I mean, the staff has grown tremendously and I see that as throwing a lot of money away. 

A veteran can go to one VISN and he can get a particular prosthetic item issued to him. He can go to another VISN and they will 

deny that very same piece of equipment. So as I say, with this concept of them operating autonomously is where the problems come 

in. 

I mean, we have Federal regulations that mandate how VA is 

supposed to do things. There are directives and all this other—that 

here—is what you need to provide. It is veterans’ choice on wheelchairs, this, this, this. But when you go to different VISNs and it 

is not the same. I personally would prefer that we go back to the 

four regions. 

Mr. MICHAUD. Thank you. 

Next one is for Doc. 

You mentioned about the adult daycare services and I know the 

veterans’ home in Maine is thinking about building a facility right 

on the same complex as a CBOC. 

Have you talked to the veterans’ home nationally to see if that 

is something that they are interested in doing and participating in 

the adult daycare services for our veterans? 

Sergeant MCCAUSLIN. Thank you, sir. 

In fact, this past week, I believe it was Tuesday, I went to their 

winter convention downtown D.C. and we addressed that very 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

25 

issue. And so they are asking why can’t the VA publish their regulation to get this across the country. It has been four years. 

So there are three states that are doing it right now, but the rest 

of them are holding back because there is no correlation with the 

VA. 

Mr. MICHAUD. Thank you. 

My last question is for Mr. Rowan. 

You mentioned about if a veteran adds a dependent and it takes 

so long to get the claim through. One of the concerns, I have, and 

I know the VBMS system is a tool, but you have to look at policies 

and how to make that system work. 

Have you found cases where a veteran might have ten conditions, 

VBA approves nine of them, but they are waiting for the tenth one 

before they get disability payments? Is that common throughout 

the system? 

Mr. ROWAN. They are supposed to handle that separately, but, 

you know, that may fall through the cracks. Just like the VISNs 

are different, the VA regional offices are unfortunately different as 

well. We see that some claims get different percentages depending 

on which VISN you go to. 

You know, the thing about the dependents and adding them on 

is the fact that the raters get no credit for it. So because they are 

all desiring to get their full credit so they can get paid, they slough 

that stuff off and maybe once in a year they will put a bunch of 

people together to clean up the backlog. 

Well, I understand all of that and I can even understand the priority issue, but they ought to be able to do it on a more timely 

basis either weekly or monthly. You know, you want to do it once 

a month, do it once a month, but do not do it once a year. 

Mr. MICHAUD. Okay. Thank you. 

I yield back, Mr. Chairman. 

The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Walz. 

Mr. WALZ. I would yield my time to Mr. Boozman if he walked 

in. 

The CHAIRMAN. You sure? He gets to stay behind after we leave, 

so—— 

Mr. WALZ. I like that he is going after the Senate. It might segue 

well to my comments that are coming, so thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Thank you all for being here and to the folks who braved the 

snow-quester to get here and testify on a really important issue. I 

am always grateful. 

I think you hear it a lot, but I think it is important to remember. 

You being here and speaking with that moral authority makes all 

the difference in the world. 

I am convinced there are some that just think they are going to 

wait us out, us until we lose, you until you die, and then move on 

as business as usual. We cannot allow that to happen. 

And I said no matter what the time, a moral argument cannot 

be trumped by a fiscal argument. If there is a responsibility to do 

what is right in this Nation and prioritizing, as you heard the 

Chairman say, putting things first, we need to do that. 

So I am grateful for you being here. Thank all of you for your 

testimony on 679. That bill does not cost us a dang penny. It does 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

26 

cost us, I think, our dignity and our integrity for not recognizing 

and allowing to be recognized by other Americans, those who did 

their service. 

The general is right. It passed over here. I would encourage my 

Senate colleagues to figure out what the hangup is on that thing 

because we are starting to be a little cynical about it. There is no 

reason not to let it go. So I am appreciative of that. 

I will say, too, that some of you mentioned this, I along with my 

colleagues, got to witness a demonstration in San Diego. Down in 

the southern California area, the electronic medical record that is 

working together with VA, with DoD, with Kaiser Permanente, and 

the private sector, we witnessed it working. 

If that can be the norm and go, I think what you are going to 

see—and you have brought up a great point, Mr. Kilgore. This is 

not only a money saver. This saves people’s lives. Electronic medical records are a key to making sure we get the right care. 

In this Nation, we have about 90,000 deaths by medical errors 

that happen every year in our private hospitals across the country. 

A lot of those can be alleviated by having proper data at the hands 

of the physician. So I appreciate you pushing this. 

If I could just ask you by a show of hands how many of you realistically think that the VA is going to get their processing times 

down to 125 days by 2015. 

And I say that. You are not a cynical bunch. You are an optimistic bunch. You are problem solvers. You are doers. So we have 

a real challenge with this, that I talk to people and I, too, have 

watched with my colleagues. We ask this to people who are in 

charge of this and they say yes. And I make the analogy it is just 

like sports teams. Everybody wants to win. Some just do a little 

better job of preparing to win. 

And I am very concerned that I do not question the desire to get 

it down. I do question if we are going to get there. And this thing 

causes all kinds of problems. It is a broken record, I know, but we 

have got to bust this thing. 

So anything you can do or any ideas you have pushing forward 

would be greatly appreciated. 

And, Mr. Rowan, I share your concerns, too, that I think, again, 

going back to the moral argument, there has not been enough research done on these dependents, on these children. It is not just 

going to be Agent Orange. It is going to be Gulf War. It is going 

to be depleted uranium. It is going to be all the other issues that 

go forward. 

And I think we as a Nation, once again, it is not just doing the 

right thing. The better research we have earlier on, we can prevent 

some of these things, I think, and that in itself is the right thing 

to do, right way to save money. 

So I appreciate your dogged commitment to making sure we get 

that. 

With that, we know what we have to do. You hear us. It is a 

matter of results that matters. The talk is nothing. The results 

matter. And I think you being here makes sure those results are 

going to get here. 

I yield back. 

The CHAIRMAN. Ms. Brownley. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

27 

Ms. BROWNLEY. Thank you, Mr. Chair. 

And I do not have any specific questions, but I just wanted to 

say that I am one of the new Members on this Committee and 

Ranking Member on the Health Subcommittee of this Committee. 

And I just want to first thank all of you for your past service and 

your current service. And I am listening and am listening very 

carefully and methodically and I know that it is clear to me that 

the challenges are growing which is going to require us to really 

step up to the plate like we have never done before. 

And I think that none of these challenges, as Mr. Walz was saying, results is the key here, but none of these challenges, I think, 

are insurmountable. But I do believe and I do believe that every 

single veteran would never have signed that blank check if they 

thought the challenges of our country were insurmountable. 

And so it is incumbent on all of us to step up to the plate and 

make sure that the resources are there for us to serve our veterans 

today and knowing that the challenges are growing and growing 

here very, very quickly, that we are able to meet those challenges 

as well. And I look forward to partnering with you to make sure 

that we can accomplish that small challenge. 

The CHAIRMAN. Mr. O’Rourke. 

Mr. O’ROURKE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

I want to start by thanking you for your service to our country 

and for your service to your fellow veterans and to tell you that I 

am also a new Member. And it is a big honor and privilege to represent you and the veterans in my hometown of El Paso, Texas 

here on this Committee and in this Congress. 

And you have also done a great service in highlighting and outlining the challenges and sometimes outright failures of the Federal Government in owing up to its side of the bargain and meeting 

its obligations to you and your fellow veterans. 

And so one question I have for you is who in this country is getting it right on a state level or on a local level? 

Congressman Walz mentioned the electronic medical records in 

San Diego. We heard testimony last week of VBA in Pittsburgh 

turning around claims in 30 days. I know some states have pioneered workforce transition and hire a vet programs. 

Can any of you and perhaps Mr. Marsh identify some of those 

best practices and best performing communities and states that we 

can draw an example from and learn from at this level? 

Admiral MARSH. I think the one that I would point to is regarding the claims processing and backlogs. The VA is in the process 

of rolling out VBMS which is an electronics claims processing system, but we have a number of states that have their own electronics claims filing system. It is not a true database, but it is 

where we maintain all the veterans’ information and do the processing. And what we are doing is that creates transparency. It 

makes it easier to work with it. 

And also, we will be able to tie into VBMS via portal once that 

is operational. And there are 20 some states or more that have 

that, but we have got a task force that is working with the VA as 

they develop VBMS so that it will be able to operate in all the 

states that have their systems and then those who bring on their 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

28 

systems that could connect to VBMS. And I think that is going to 

help with the overall processing of claims to reach veterans. 

Now, the other thing is that we need what that one state has 

and that is a database. It is a veterans’ database with all the veterans’ information in it and it is accessible. So you can use that to 

identify all your veterans, contract those veterans, do outreach, and 

you can target down to specific problems or illnesses, if you will, 

so that you can look at those as a segment or study or treat and 

do outreach. 

So those are two things that I would point to. 

Mr. O’ROURKE. Are there any states specifically that you would 

point this towards who are implementing this and sharing this 

data on a level that, you know, are superior to what we are doing 

or what other states in the country are doing? 

Admiral MARSH. The one state that I mentioned is Utah that has 

that database that they created with the help—I think they got 

some help from rural health in the VA department. But the states 

that are participating with the IT development of VBMS, that task 

force is Virginia, California, Kentucky, San Diego, and Utah. And 

that is who developed this system so that it will be compatible and 

able to connect to all the states so that everybody will be connected. 

So when a claim is submitted at any state, it has visibility in VA 

headquarters or anywhere. Anybody can look at that information 

if they go into the database and pull up a file. That is how transparent and accessible it should be. 

Mr. O’ROURKE. Thank you. 

Mr. Chair, I yield back. 

The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Ruiz. 

Mr. RUIZ. Thank you, Chairman. 

And thank all of you for trekking this snow and for traveling so 

far from your homes and the comfort of your homes to stand up for 

something that you really believe in. 

And as I said before, you know, we owe our veterans more than 

just lip service. And I am committed to making sure that we come 

together to find out what the solutions are. 

I am a new Member of Congress. I am from the Palm Springs, 

California area. It is a place where a lot of veterans like to go and 

retire. So a lot of the issues that I hear here are very similar to 

what I hear in my district. 

Funding for veterans’ benefits and health care services is without 

question a top priority for me and Congress. And as a new Member 

of Congress, I look forward to getting to know all of you and your 

departments and organizations and together work to improve the 

veterans’ health care services and benefits. 

I had the opportunity to review this year’s Independent Budget 

and I appreciate the VSOs’ insight on the Department of Veterans 

Affairs’ funding levels for fiscal year 2014. Although we currently 

operate in a challenging fiscal climate, I believe that we must make 

a concerted effort to work together in a bipartisan manner to ensure that the VA delivers the quality of health care for veterans 

they deserve. 

I am an emergency medicine physician, so when I talk about to 

ensure high-quality care, I really mean high-quality care. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

29 

I am looking forward to hearing more statements in the future 

about the VA budget for fiscal year 2014 as well as the other legislative priorities of the organizations that are here. My doors are always open. 

And I yield back my time. 

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much. 

And I will now recognize Senator Boozman. 

OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR JOHN BOOZMAN 

Senator BOOZMAN. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. 

I apologize for being late. We actually had votes on our side and 

I know that the guys and gals have to clear out now and go vote. 

The CHAIRMAN. Yeah, one vote a week, right? 

Senator BOOZMAN. As you can tell, I do not get any respect over 

here at all anymore. But I do want to compliment the Chairman 

and the Ranking Member, the tremendous job that they do. You 

know, this truly is, and, again, you know, Senator Burr and Senator Sanders, you know, everybody working together. But that really is what it is all about. 

So I apologize for being late. I really do not have any questions. 

I just want to thank you for being here, especially on a very difficult day. I cannot tell you how much we appreciate you being up 

here in the sense that we are trying to push things forward, but 

there is no substitute for you all being here and helping us do that. 

All of you all we enjoy working with. 

I particularly know that it works in the sense that, you know, 

my dad retired from the air force after 20 years as a master sergeant and I do not think I was ever over at his house that that 

publication was not out on the coffee table. I know that whatever, 

you know, was out, he read cover to cover and kept up. 

The other thing that I understand and the Committee understands, but I think in particular at the latter stage of his career, 

he was in recruiting, and I understand that the things that we are 

talking about are earned benefits. You know, it is not something 

that, you know, that is given, but they are earned benefits. 

And also, the other day when Senator Rubio was introducing, 

you know, somebody from Florida that was testifying on behalf of 

veterans, he said at the close that they were there for us and we 

need to be there for them meaning you guys. And so that is our 

commitment. 

We really do appreciate all you do. Look forward to working with 

you. I know we have discussed a bunch of issues today and we are 

going to be discussing those this Congress, but certainly our intent 

is to help any way we can. 

So thank you very much. 

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much, Senator. 

Thank you, everybody, for being here today. Regardless of inclement weather or threat of inclement weather, we certainly do 

appreciate it. And hopefully we will see a little snow later on today. 

Look forward to seeing folks at PVA tomorrow. 

And I would ask unanimous consent that all Members would 

have five legislative days with which to revise and extend their remarks and add any extraneous material. Without objection, so ordered. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

30 

And with that, ladies and gentlemen, thank you, and this hearing is adjourned. 

[Whereupon, at 11:34 a.m., the Committee was adjourned.] 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

(31) 

A P P E N D I X 

Prepared Statement of Chairman Jeff Miller 

Joint Hearing of the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees to Receive the 

Legislative Presentation of AMVETS, Air Force Sergeants Association, Paralyzed Veterans of America, Jewish War Veterans, Gold Star Wives, Fleet Reserve Association, 

Vietnam Veterans Association and the National Association of State Directors of Veterans Affairs 

March 6, 2013 

This hearing will come to order. 

Good morning. 

It is my privilege to welcome you to today’s joint hearing of the House and Senate 

Veterans’ Affairs Committees to receive the legislative presentations of AMVETS, 

the Air Force Sergeants Association, Paralyzed Veterans of America, Jewish War 

Veterans, Gold Star Wives, the Fleet Reserve Association, Vietnam Veterans Association, and the National Association of State Directors of Veterans Affairs 

These groups represent what is truly great about the veteran community—that 

veterans and their families, no matter what generation or branch of service, continue to tend to the needs of their fellow Americans who have served. 

We are also joined here today by Chairman Sanders, Ranking Member Michaud, 

and Ranking Member Burr as well as Committee Members from both the House and 

the Senate. 

In the interest of time and in keeping with the tradition of these hearings, after 

hearing from myself, Chairman Sanders, Ranking Member Michaud, and Ranking 

Member Burr, I would like to ask all other Committee Members to waive their opening statements. 

There will be an opportunity for remarks following today’s testimony. 

Hearing no objection, so ordered. 

I would also like to welcome the members of each organization’s auxiliary, and 

thank each of you for your work behind the scenes. 

The energy and attention that the auxiliaries bring to these issues ensures that 

no one is overlooked. 

Thank you all for your service to our country and your service to your fellow veterans. 

Before we go any further, I would like to take a moment to recognize the members 

of the different organizations who - like myself - are proud to call Florida home. 

Gentlemen and ladies, would you please stand? 

On behalf of all our neighbors in the Sunshine State, I thank you for your service 

and your sacrifice. 

These committees, with your help, worked hard in the One Hundred and Twelfth 

Congress to ensure that the commitment America has made to its veterans remains 

strong. Again in the One Hundred and Thirteenth Congress, we will look to you and 

your organizations to help us address the problems facing America’s veterans. 

Together we reduced veteran unemployment and created new programs aimed at 

providing veterans Twenty First century job skills. 

We have vigilantly conducted oversight into all areas of the Department of Veterans Affairs in order to keep our veterans safe and to maximize the care they receive. In these difficult fiscal times, there is no excuse for the waste of funds allocated to taking care of our veterans. 

While these committees have worked hard to ensure that the sequester does not 

impact VA, we must continue to work to ensure that our Nation’s veterans receive 

the care they deserve. 

Given the uncertain budget process, Ranking Member Michaud and I introduced 

H.R. Eight Hundred and Thirteen: Putting Veterans Funding First Act of Two 

Thousand and Thirteen. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

32 

This bill will require Congress to fully fund the Department of Veterans Affairs 

discretionary budget a year ahead of schedule, ensuring that all VA services will 

have timely and predictable funding. 

While every one of your organizations has a unique set of legislative priorities, 

you also share a common goal, one that we on these Committees share with you: 

providing nothing short of the best for our veterans, their families, and their survivors who have shared in their sacrifice. 

In times like these, the work of organizations like yours has never been more important. 

Thank you all once again. 

f 

Prepared Statement of Hon. Michael H. Michaud 

Good Morning. 

I welcome all of the Members and Leadership of the Veteran Service Organizations attending today for this joint legislation presentation. 

It is great to see so many important organizations here today, and I look forward 

to hearing the priorities set forth in your testimony. 

I want to take a moment to recognize those of you who have traveled from Maine. 

Thank you for making the trip. 

Our Nation has a ‘‘sacred trust’’ with all veterans—a national promise to care for 

and stand up for those who have served and sacrificed. The VSOs represented here 

today help to ensure that the most important issues facing American veterans remain at the center of the national stage. You fulfill a vital role in the ‘‘community 

of support’’ America provides its national heroes. 

As you know, the Administration has delayed the release of its FY2014 budget 

proposal. While VA programs are spared from the effects of sequestration, that does 

not mean that veterans will be left unaffected in their capacity as citizens. State 

and local government services—services on which our veterans rely—will come 

under additional strain. 

In many ways, the VA is facing unprecedented challenges as it continues to serve 

the veterans of the Second World War, Korean War, and the Vietnam War as well 

as those just now returned from the Middle East. Together, we must work to ensure 

everyone who has stepped up to serve this Nation is served by this Nation. No one 

should fall through the cracks. 

I look forward to your testimony today, and again thank you for your organization’s years of service to our veterans. 

f 

Prepared Statement of Cleve Geer 

As the National Commander of AMVETS, it is my honor to share our concerns 

and comment on the issues under the purview of your committees. As one of the 

largest veteran service organizations in the country, as well as one of the authors 

of the Independent Budget, AMVETS has a proud history of assisting veterans and 

advocating for veterans rights and benefits. Since 1944 AMVETS has been at the 

forefront of public policy related to military and veteran issues and national defense. 

In anticipation of working with your Committees throughout this year, I offer this 

introduction to some of the areas of interest to the quarter of a million members 

of AMVETS. Today, with more than a decade of continuous war behind us, horrific 

budget cuts just beginning to be implemented and fiscal uncertainty on the horizon, 

our men and women in uniform have remained steadfast in their mission to defend 

this great nation. Over the last dozen years of war, many of these brave service 

members paid the ultimate price for our freedom and others, at the completion of 

their service or due to injuries, have joined the ranks of our nation’s veterans. This 

dedication and sacrifice must never be forgotten and the promises made to this nation’s heroes must be fully and faithfully honored. 

Now is the time for the Administration and Congress to step up and acknowledge 

all that our veterans have done for this country. We, as a nation, have, through the 

sacrifice of our veterans and military members, incurred a solemn obligation to support them in every way possible now and into the future. President Obama once 

said that the national budget would not be balanced on the backs of veterans and 

AMVETS adamantly supports this concept of preserving all earned veteran benefits. 

Our service members and veterans do not deserve to be asked to continue making 

sacrifices; they don’t deserve excuses or broken promises, they deserve this nation’s 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

33 

full support and nothing less. They’ve done the hard work on behalf of all Americans; now is the time for all Americans to relieve them of their heavy burdens. 

Today’s military and veteran community is faced with many challenges and 

AMVETS is dedicated to aggressively tackling these issues on behalf of American 

Veterans everywhere including: 

Veteran Unemployment 

• Reserve Component • Active Component • Veteran Anti-Discrimination 

VA/DoD Health Care & Mental Health 

• Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) & Post-Traumatic Stress (PTS) • Prosthetic & Sensory Aides • Suicide Prevention • Ft. McClellan Toxic Chemical Exposure 

Veterans Benefits 

• Maintain Military Retirement and Health Care Benefits • Concurrent Receipt (Active & Reserve Component) • VA Claims & Appeals Backlog 

Women Veterans & Service Members 

• Military Sexual Trauma (MST) Prevention and Treatment • Creation of a Sexual Assault Oversight and Response Office • Gender Specific Healthcare 

National Guard & Reserve Service Members 

• Improved USERRA Protections • On-going Transition Between State and Federal Service • Veteran Status 

Homeless & Rural Veterans 

• Provide a Full Continuum of Care for Homeless Veterans (employment training, 

housing, legal aid) • Access to Physical and Mental Health Care and other benefits • Increase Travel Reimbursement Rates 

POW/MIA Recovery/Identification & Cemetery Affairs 

• Improved Over Site of Mortuary Affairs Operations • Increase Veterans Burial Benefits 

Veterans Treatment Courts 

• Increase Number of and Access to Veterans Treatment Courts Nationally • Enhance Resources to Address Mental Health and Substance Abuse Issues 

Honor and Remembrance 

• Establish the National Desert Storm War Memorial in Washington, D.C. 

Veteran Anti-Discrimination 

AMVETS believes that perhaps the greatest and most comprehensive assistance 

this nation could provide for its veterans is to protect them from all forms of discrimination and employer bias by enacting the AMVETS Veteran Anti-Discrimination Initiative and by strengthening USERRA. Since moving to an all-volunteer 

military, the number of veterans serving in Congress and at all levels of leadership 

is the smallest it’s ever been and this, added to the years of constant focus on the 

negative aspects of war, has created the perception that all veterans are flawed, 

dangerous and unstable. While it is true that veterans should be protected from all 

forms of discrimination under USERRA, sadly that is not the case, in part, due to 

ignorance of its legal requirements as well as lax oversight and enforcement. Sadly, 

those who have served and fought for their country do not enjoy the same protections and advantages under the law. In fact, just the opposite is often true; frequently those who have served and sacrificed are at a disadvantage in comparison 

to their peers. 

With this in mind, AMVETS is seeking protected status for all American veterans 

to give them every advantage in finding gainful employment, housing, and educational opportunities. This comprehensive, nearly cost-neutral initiative would enhance veteran access and equity in all areas and it would provide legal recourse to 

veterans experiencing any form of discrimination. 

Veteran Unemployment 

During this time of persistent unemployment in our country, the problem of veteran unemployment, especially for our National Guard and Reserve members, 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

34 

should be seen as a national disgrace. In recognition of those who honorably and 

selflessly fought to maintain the freedoms of those who stayed behind, we as a nation cannot do enough to ensure that American Veterans get the proper skills, certifications/credentials and degrees necessary to be successful and competitive in the 

civilian job market. 

Veteran unemployment is a complex problem which will require the efforts of federal and state governments, the business community and the military/veterans community working in concert if any meaningful solution is to be developed. The efforts 

of any one entity alone will be insufficient to meet the challenges posed by this massive problem facing American Veterans everywhere and it’s important to keep in 

mind that veterans, like their civilian counterparts, require not just a job, but living-wage employment following their service. The vast majority of working-age veterans want to continue to be productive citizens and they need to be provided every 

opportunity to achieve their career goals. In recognition of the unimaginable sacrifices made by American Veterans, Congress and the Administration need to continue to make a concerted effort to guarantee that veterans have access to employment and training opportunities. 

Additionally there needs to be a better system to connect employers with open positions to unemployed veterans; the current system of merely posting jobs online, 

while beneficial, just isn’t enough. There are literally hundreds of online employment and career sites catering to veterans and civilians alike, which unfortunately 

can leave veterans confused and overwhelmed. What is needed is a comprehensive 

‘veteran employment resource guide’ along with a single portal or site where all of 

these opportunities can be accessed in one place. The ‘Hero2Hired’ program is a 

good example and should serve as a good foundation to build on. 

In addition to the previous issues, there is the very real problem of licensing and 

credentialing which is required in certain career fields. AMVETS believes that if an 

individual has received training and practical experience in a career field while 

serving in the military there should be a streamlined process for demonstrating 

their knowledge and expertise in order to qualify for any necessary license or credential. 

Lastly, Congress and the Administration need to consider the very real connection 

between unemployment and its effects on the already vulnerable mental health of 

our veterans. Common sense suggest that individuals who are gainfully and appropriately employed, who are able to support themselves and their families, who are 

able to utilize their skills and abilities, who are receiving any necessary health care, 

who feel useful, challenged and appreciated are less likely to suffer from depression, 

substance abuse problems and/or commit suicide. 

Health Care & Mental Health 

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is not only the largest direct provider 

of healthcare services in the nation, it also provides the most extensive training environment for health professionals as well as providing the most clinically focused 

setting for medical and prosthetic research. While providing primary care to American Veterans is among the VA’s prime responsibilities, it also provides specialized 

health care services including: spinal cord injury, blind rehabilitation, traumatic 

brain injury, prosthetic services, mental health, and war-related poly-trauma injuries. AMVETS believes that in order to avoid catastrophic degradation to these critical services that Congress needs to: 

• pass a budget on a regular basis. The need for sufficient, timely and predictable 

funding cannot be over-emphasized; 

• continue advanced appropriations; 

• continue to introduce and support legislation that protects veterans’ benefits 

such as HR 813, the Putting Veterans Funding First Act of 2013, introduced 

by Chairman Miller. Thank you sir! Another example of benefits protection legislation introduced by both Chairman Miller and Ranking Member Michaud is 

HR 357 the G.I. Tuition Fairness Act of 2013, which gives public institutions 

of higher education a choice – either charge veterans in-state tuition or no 

longer be eligible to accept G.I. bill students. Last but by no means least, I’d 

also like to acknowledge the important work done by Chairman Sanders on the 

chained CPI threat. The chained CPI would cut benefits to disabled veterans 

and social security recipients, who are among the most vulnerable Americans. 

Thank you sir! 

Unfortunately, the VA also faces significant challenges ensuring that newly returning war veterans have access to post-deployment readjustment services and specialized treatments while guaranteeing that all other enrolled veterans gain and 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

35 

keep access to effective, timely, high-quality mental health services. In fact, outreach to veterans from all eras needs to continue to improve. 

The mental health of our service members and veterans may be one of the greatest challenges facing the VA today and while there have been improvements, there’s 

still a long way to go. This is especially true in the case of women veterans who 

not only respond to and deal with combat stress differently than their male counterparts, but also need gender-specific treatment. 

There can be no doubt that the problem of military/veteran suicide is of great concern to everyone in the military community and sadly the problem continues to 

grow. Only recently, the military released a report showing that suicides among active duty service members reached an all-time high in 2012. The report indicated 

that the number of suicides among active duty personnel was almost one a day or 

349 to be exact. 

These numbers are especially distressing in light of the ongoing efforts of the Department of Defense (DoD), Veterans Affairs (VA) and a variety of public and private enterprises. It seems obvious that more needs to be done to uncover the complex mental and physical factors that lead military service members and veterans 

to commit suicide. 

One significant aspect that may shed some additional light on this unacceptable 

situation is the possible correlation between blast injuries caused by Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) and suicide. By collecting information about the physical injuries sustained by suicide victims, we may be able to get a clearer idea of the underlying causes of military and veteran suicide. 

In a war fought largely on the principals of indiscriminate violence and terror, the 

IED is often the weapon of choice. According to data compiled by DoD and the Global Campaign Against IEDs, between November 2011 and October 2012, over 15,000 

individual IED events were experienced by coalition forces in Afghanistan. Those 

IED events were responsible for fully 58% of coalition casualties. In fact, IEDs are 

the number one cause of casualties for American service members and will be for 

the foreseeable future. 

Additionally, IEDs are the major cause of the top 4 most prevalent injuries to veterans including: 

• hearing loss and Tinnitus, • traumatic brain injury (TBI), • post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and • vision loss 

Even more significant are the alarming number of service members and veterans 

who experienced repetitive, low level TBI that did not require medical attention but, 

taken cumulatively, produce serious medical conditions years later. These conditions 

often exhibit symptoms that affect mood, behavior and thoughts. Many of our veterans are experiencing a complex combination of mental and physical health problems, the weight of which should be viewed as a contributing factor to the feelings 

of pain, hopelessness, loneliness, helplessness and depression that can lead to suicide. 

IED survivors face challenges ranging from the minor to the monumental: fractures, amputations, disfigurement, cognitive and motor impairments, emboli, headaches, personality changes, visual and auditory disturbances, altered effect, 

hypersensitivities, and dulled judgment. 

The good news is that thanks to swift triage and aeromedical evacuations and improvements in battlefield trauma medicine and surgical procedures, many more 

combat-wounded personnel are surviving military action. Unfortunately blast injuries by their very nature usually include vision injuries, hearing loss, and brain 

trauma. 

The bad news is that those same individuals will likely require highly specialized 

neurological, psychological, and ophthalmological care, life-long mental health care, 

sophisticated prosthetics and other vital services. At this juncture, there is no definitive connection between IED injuries, these conditions, and veterans’ suicides because this possibility has not been adequately investigated. Now is the time to do 

so. 

It must be remembered that we are looking at an issue that will span decades. 

We applaud the VA for working to reduce the stigma surrounding PTSD and the 

increase in support services. AMVETS is committed to addressing this issue by piloting a warrior transition workshop. Our team of veterans, trainers and experts associated with Freedom and Honor have shown success since 2005; serving more 

than 7,000 active duty/veterans in 60,000 hours of training. We recommend that the 

VA consider both clinical and non-clinical treatment options when deciding how to 

fill the gap between need and timely access. Non-clinical mental health treatment 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

36 

options are readily available in most communities, are generally much more cost effective than clinical options with shorter wait times and can be an effective segment 

in an overall mental health treatment program. The Freedom and Honor Warrior 

Transition program focus’ on making veterans more resilient and can be effectively 

integrated into the DoD and VA systems. AMVETS will have four pilot programs 

this year, with one being directed specifically to women veterans. 

As previously mentioned, untreated/unhealed physical and mental health combat 

injuries play a significant role in the number of military/veteran suicides in this 

country. The data on these suicides are startling and they have continued to rise. 

This horrific trend is a national disgrace and finding effective, practical solutions 

should be not only a service-wide, but a nation-wide priority. 

Veterans’ Benefits 

AMVETS believes in the solemnity of the promises made to our military members 

and veterans when they agreed to leave their homes and families to go fight in our 

stead. In addition to providing physical and mental healthcare to millions of veterans, the VA is also the primary federal agency providing a variety of benefits to 

our nation’s veterans including: disability compensation, dependency and indemnity 

compensation, pensions, retirement, education benefits, home loans, ancillary benefits for service-connected disabled veterans, life insurance and burial benefits. It is 

crucial, that veterans’ benefits become a national priority, as they had been following earlier conflicts, and they must be viewed in the context of the service and 

sacrifice performed by our men and women in uniform. These benefit programs however must not only be maintained, they need to be carefully monitored and constantly improved so they maintain their value and effectiveness. 

Like every other VSO, and no doubt every member of these committees, AMVETS 

is appalled by the seemingly insurmountable disability claims backlog problem, 

however, since everyone is already so aware of the need to deal with this issue, I 

will not do more than acknowledge the problem and our commitment to carefully 

monitoring developments and assisting as appropriate. 

As far as the issue of concurrent receipt in concerned, AMVETS firmly believes 

that all military retirees should be permitted to receive their full, earned military 

retirement as well as any and all VA disability compensation they may be entitled 

to; in other words there should be no offset between full military retired pay and 

VA disability compensation. Each form of compensation is individually earned, in 

its own right, by the veteran and other federal employees are not unjustly penalized 

this same way when in an identical situation. AMVETS strongly urges Congress 

and the Administration to enact legislation to repeal this inequity faced by so many 

American Veterans. 

Women Veterans and Service Members 

It is a fact, that every woman who ever served in the military in America did so 

as a volunteer! Their history of service to this country is long and proud even 

though their service prior to the Civil War was strictly unofficial; they have been 

involved in every battle, one way or another, going back to the Revolutionary War. 

Today, women comprise between 17% – 20% of the U.S. military and they are fully 

integrated into the combat zones around the world. In the near future women will 

be allowed to serve in direct combat roles and may be required to sign up for selective service both of which suggest we are entering a new era for women in the military. One can only imagine how these decisions will affect the generations of women 

to come. VA is already so far behind in meeting the needs of current women service 

members and veterans that AMVETS is gravely concerned about VA’s ability to 

meet increasing future needs. 

Among the most critical issues facing women veterans today are: homelessness, 

employment, military sexual trauma (MST) and the lack of gender specific health 

care. These three issues are the trifecta of degradation and deprivation for women 

veterans. They are also somewhat of a ‘Catch-22’ in that each issue overlaps and 

effects the other two, making it that much more difficult to escape this negative 

cycle. How can we as a nation allow some of our most vulnerable veterans, many 

of whom also have children, to be living on the streets of our cities? Why is it that 

a woman should have to fear for her personal safety, not only from foreign enemies, 

but from her comrades-in-arms simply because she made a conscious decision to 

serve in the military? All veterans, by their very service to their country, should be 

guaranteed some basics: shelter, any necessary physical and mental health care, 

food, job training or education, and an opportunity to support themselves and their 

children upon exiting the military. 

Some of these veterans are already victims of MST and PTSD while on active 

duty and now they are faced with the dangers and lack of appropriate physical and 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

37 

mental health care inherent in being homeless. These veterans are often unable to 

locate temporary housing at local homeless shelters because many of these facilities 

are not set up to house to accommodate the specific safety and privacy needs of 

women, not to mention their children. It’s a sad fact that homeless individuals are 

not infrequently involved in the criminal justice system for a variety of offences, including crimes against women and children. This situation is truly a national disgrace and must not be allowed to continue. 

A new report from the Government Accountability Office shows that the number 

of homeless women veterans doubled between 2006 and 2010, with 3,328 women 

veterans unable to access shelter. Of these women, ‘‘almost two-thirds were between 

40 and 59 years old and over one-third had disabilities.’’ The numbers are not encouraging and they are expected to get worse. With tens of thousands of troops leaving military service and more slated over the next year, for women veterans with 

families, it’s especially difficult to find work and housing. As of December 2011, The 

Veterans’ Administration estimated that of the roughly 68,000 homeless veterans, 

more than 5,000 were women. To combat the problem, the VA is training many of 

its 7,000 case managers to deal with issues specific to women. 

National Guard & Reserve Service Members 

AMVETS fully supports H.R.679, the Honor America’s Guard-Reserve Retirees 

Act introduced for the 3rd year in a row by Rep. Walz (thank you, Sir!) which would 

grant Veteran Status for National Guard and Reserve members with 20 years or 

more in service. This cost neutral legislation would not bestow any new or unearned 

benefits, it would simply provide career Reserve Component (RC) members the 

honor of being recognized as a veteran for their many years of service and sacrifice. 

This bill would also provide an opportunity for Congress and the Administration to 

show their support for America’s military retirees. 

What is a military retiree? A military retiree is what a National Guard or Reserve 

Component member, who has completed a 20(+) year career, is designated upon retirement. If these individuals have never served on active duty (Title 10) orders for 

other than training purposes for a specified number of days, they are not legally 

considered veterans. Mind you, they are entitled to virtually all the same retirement 

benefits as their Active Component brethren, but they are not considered veterans 

under the law. This unjust situation is not widely known among members of Congress (outside of these committees) or even among members of the RC themselves. 

This legislation would authorize Veteran Status under Title 38 for National 

Guard and Reserve members of the Armed Forces who are entitled to a non-regular 

retirement under Chapter 1223 of 10 USC but were never called to active federal 

service during their careers – through no fault of their own. As an example, the 

service of our National Guard members now serving on Operation Noble Eagle on 

our Southwestern border on Title 32 orders would not qualify them to earn the status of ‘‘Veterans of our Armed Forces’’ because it is technically a ‘‘training’’ status. 

Currently, the Code of Veterans’ Benefits, Title 38, excludes from the definition 

of ‘‘Veteran’’ career reservists who have not served on Title 10 active duty for other 

than training purposes. Drill training, annual training, active duty for training, and 

Title 32 duty are not qualifying service for ‘‘Veteran’’ status. It does not make sense 

that an individual can serve three years on active duty, during a time of war or 

not and upon leaving the military they are considered a veteran; however, a National Guard or Reserve member who has 20(+) years of service but has not called 

to federal service is not considered a veteran –even though they wear the same uniform and receive similar benefits. 

Homeless Veterans 

We as a country have failed many veterans who now find themselves mentally 

or physical ill, alone, unemployed and homeless. AMVETS urges the committees to 

consider the importance of supportive housing facilities for homeless veterans, many 

of which are situated on VA property and/or owned and operated by the VA. One 

of the first steps that need to be taken to break this chain of poverty is to get our 

veterans, men and women, off the streets and into supportive housing. Consistent 

with Secretary Shinseki’s goal of eliminating homelessness among veterans by the 

year 2015, these facilities are vital to the scores of homeless veterans – including 

those from Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom – that rely upon them 

for shelter, health care, and other services. 

AMVETS appreciates the support that the committees have shown for programs 

to mitigate the scourge of homelessness among veterans. The VA’s ‘‘housing first’’ 

approach – which has largely been carried out via a combination of increases in 

HUD–VASH vouchers, enhanced funding for the grant and per diem program, and 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

38 

support for outreach coordinators – has, in recent years, allowed the VA to make 

important progress toward its goal of eliminating veterans’ homelessness. 

Even as this progress continues, AMVETS encourages the committees and the VA 

to prioritize the construction or repurposing of facilities on VA property to be used 

for supportive housing for homeless veterans. The shortage of such housing is particularly acute in the Los Angeles region, where approximately 8,000–10,000 veterans remain homeless. This represents an approximate 10 percent share of all 

homeless veterans nationwide. Remedying the homeless veterans’ problem in Los 

Angeles is essential to meeting Secretary Shinseki’s goal of elimination. 

Mortuary Affairs 

There is no more sacred responsibility than the dignified and respectful recovery, 

return and burial of our men and women in uniform. With this in mind, we need 

to remember that NCA’s most important obligation is to honor the memory of America’s service members. AMVETS is pleased with the fact that NCA continues to 

meet its goals thanks to the dedication and commitment of Under Secretary Muro 

and his staff. 

NCA does a good job of looking ahead in anticipation of the future needs of our 

veterans by: 

• securing land for additional cemeteries, including two new national cemeteries 

in Florida and working in CO & NY; • getting the word out on burial benefits to stakeholders. Including developing 

new online resources for Funeral Directors; 

• making it easier for family members to locate and chronicle loved ones by 

partnering with Ancestry.com to index historic burial records; 

• awarding grant money for State and Tribal Veterans Cemeteries; and 

• expanding burial options in rural areas (National Veterans Burial Grounds) 

NCA is also a leader among federal agencies in veteran employment programs including: 

• The Homeless Veteran Supported Employment Program (HVSEP) provides vocational assistance, job development and placement, and ongoing supports to 

improve employment outcomes among homeless Veterans and Veterans at-risk 

of homelessness. Formerly homeless Veterans who have been trained as Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists (VRSs) provide these services; 

• VA’s Compensated Work Therapy (CWT) Program is a national vocational program comprised of three unique programs which assist homeless Veterans in returning to competitive employment: Sheltered Workshop, Transitional Work, 

and Supported Employment. Veterans in CWT are paid at least the federal or 

state minimum wage, whichever is higher; VA’s National Cemetery Administration and Veterans Health Administration have also formed partnerships at national cemeteries, where formerly homeless Veterans from the CWT program 

have received work opportunities; and 

• The Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment (VR&E) VetSuccess Program 

assists Veterans with service-connected disabilities to prepare for, find, and 

keep suitable jobs. Services that may be provided include: Comprehensive rehabilitation evaluation to determine abilities, skills, and interests for employment; 

employment services; assistance finding and keeping a job; and On the Job 

Training (OJT), apprenticeship, and non-paid work experiences. 

Does this mean that there are no areas needing improvement at NCA – absolutely 

not. From October 2011 through March 2012, NCA conducted an internal gravesite 

review of headstone and marker placements at VA National cemeteries. During that 

review a total of 251 discrepancies at 93 National cemeteries were discovered which 

included: 

• 218 misplaced headstones; 

• 25 unmarked graves; 

• 8 misplaced veteran remains 

While these incidents were corrected in a respectful, professional and expeditious 

manner, the internal phase of the NCA review failed to identify, and therefore to 

report, all misplaced headstones and unmarked gravesites. These additional discrepancies came to light thanks to the diligent oversight of Chairman Miller and the 

HVAC which had tasked the Inspector General (IG) with conducting an audit of the 

internal NCA review. The IG report highlighted several concerns and made corrective recommendations. Based on those recommendations, the Under Secretary for 

Memorial Affairs developed an appropriate action plan and AMVETS recommends 

continued oversight to ensure the carrying out of all corrective actions. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

f 

39 

Prepared Statement of CMSGT (Ret) USAF John R. ‘‘Doc’’ McCauslin 

Chairmen Sanders and Miller, on behalf of the 110,000 plus members of the Air 

Force Sergeants Association, I thank you for this opportunity to offer the views of 

our members on the FY 2014 priorities for the First Session of the 113th Congress. 

This hearing will address issues critical to those who have served and are serving 

our Nation. 

For more than 50 years, the Air Force Sergeants Association has proudly represented active duty, guard, reserve, retired, and Veteran enlisted Air Force members and their families. Your continuing effort toward improving the quality of their 

lives has made a real difference and our members are grateful. In this statement, 

I have listed several specific goals that we hope this Committee will pursue for FY 

2014 on behalf of current and past enlisted members and their families. The content 

of this statement reflects the views of our members as they have communicated 

them to us. As always, we are prepared to present more details and to discuss these 

issues with your staffs. 

How a Nation fulfills its obligations to those who serve reflects its greatness. 

Since 1973 with the inception of the all volunteer force, we have continued to meet 

our objectives in recruiting. It is evident that today’s treatment of the military influences our ability to recruit future service members, since a significant percentage 

of those wearing the uniform today come from of military families. 

It is important that this Committee view America’s Veterans as a vital National 

resource and treasure rather than as a financial burden. As you deliberate on the 

needs of America’s Veterans, this Association is gratified to play a role in the process and will work to support your decisions as they best serve this Nation’s Veterans. We believe this Nation’s response for service should be based on certain principles. We urge this Committee to consider the following principles as an underlying 

foundation for making decisions affecting this Nation’s Veterans. 

GUIDING PRINCIPLES 

1. Veterans Have Earned a Solid Transition from Their Military Service 

Back into Society: Our Nation’s all-volunteer force has served with great pride 

and distinction. This country owes its Veterans dignified, transitional, and recovery 

assistance. This help should be provided simply because they faithfully served in the 

most lethal of professions in some of the most hostile or remote locations. After writing a blank check to their country, payable up to their life, all Veterans should be 

afforded favorable chances to excel upon returning to the civilian sector. 

2. Most Veterans Are Enlisted Members: According to the VA’s vetpop2011 

product, there were 22.3 million Veterans as of September 30, 2012. Of them, only 

1.4 million (6 percent) are officers and 20.9 million (94 percent) are enlisted. While 

on active service, there is an obvious need for differentials between ranks in order 

to execute the unique missions of the military. Aside from the obvious (such as pay), 

additional differences include education, training, fellowships and other opportunities. We should factor in the unique circumstances of enlisted Veterans, especially 

in the area of service member and their family’s needs once they have completed 

their tour of service to our country. 

3. Decisions on Veterans’ Funding Should be Based on Merit: Funding for 

military Veterans must, of course, be based on fiscal reality and prudence. However, 

Congress and, in turn, the VA must never make determinations simply because ‘‘the 

money is just not there’’ or because there are now ‘‘too many’’ Veterans. Funding 

for Veterans’ programs should be viewed as a National obligation—a ‘‘must pay’’ situation. If congress can vote, fund, and send our servicemembers to war, they need 

to facilitate, fund, and provide care for those who have returned. 

4. Remember that the Guard and Reservists are Full-fledged Veterans 

Too! AFSA strongly supports pending legislation to identify all Guardsmen and Reservists as full-fledged Veterans. In Iraq, Afghanistan, and around the world, reserve component members are valiantly serving their Nation, ready to sacrifice their 

lives if necessary. Since September 11, 2001, record numbers have been called up 

and continue to support operations. Nearly half of U.S. forces that served in Iraq 

were guardsmen and reservists. Without question, enlisted guard and reserve members are full-time players as part of the ‘‘Total Force.’’ Differences between reserve 

component members and the full-time force, in terms of VA programs or availability 

of services, are well overdue for review and updates. 

5. The VA Must Openly Assume the Responsibility for Treatment of the 

Maladies of War: We are grateful for VA decisions in recent years that show a 

greater willingness to judge in favor of the service member. The VA focus on health 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

40 

care conditions caused by battle should be on presumption and correction, not on 

initial refutation, delay, and denial. It is important that the decision to send troops 

into harm’s way also involves an absolute commitment to care for any healthcare 

condition that may have resulted from that service. Many Veterans call and write 

to this Association about our government’s denial, waffling, and reluctant recognition of illnesses caused by conditions during past conflicts. We applaud past decisions of your Committees toward reinforcing a commitment to unconditional care 

after service, and encourage you to do the same in the future. 

6. Taking Care of Families: Taking care of families is as essential as taking 

care of our Veterans. This is especially true for family members who now serve as 

the primary caregivers of ill or injured Veterans. By taking care of these family 

members, we honor a commitment made by our country to our Veterans and military members. 

ANNUAL FUNDING OF VETERANS PROGRAMS 

Annual Funding: The Administration has not yet submitted its FY 2014 Budget 

request so unlike past years we cannot comment on the Administration’s proposal 

which I am told may be another month in coming. However, I want to make it clear 

that AFSA concurs with funding levels recommended by The Independent Budget 

(IB), a document co-authored by the VFW, AMVETS, Disabled American Veterans, 

and Paralyzed Veterans of America. I understand you are already aware of these 

recommendations so I will only briefly comment on them. AFSA endorses the IB because we believe this careful review of Veterans programs reflects a more realistic 

assessment of the resources VA will need for the coming fiscal year. 

This year’s Independent Budget recommends the following: 

• $58.8 billion total for health care for FY 2014—$1.3 billion more than what the 

Administration recommended ($57.5 billion) in the FY 2014 advance appropriation last year 

• $2.4 billion for the Veterans Benefits Administration—approximately $226 million more than the expected FY 2013 appropriated level 

• $2.25 billion for all construction programs—approximately $900 million more 

than the expected FY 2013 appropriated level and well below the true funding 

needs of construction projects that the VA must undertake 

• $611 million for medical and prosthetic research, which is approximately $28 

million more than the expected FY 2013 appropriated level; and 

• For the first time, the Independent Budget includes an advance appropriation 

recommendation for health care for FY 2015, recommending $61.6 billion. 

As in past years, I’m confident you will give the recommendations of the Independent Budget the consideration they deserve. We appreciate that because thousands of service members will be released by DoD in the coming months for budget 

reasons and as we draw down in Afghanistan, it is important to realize that many 

of them will soon turn to the VA for their care! VA needs to be prepared to accept 

responsibility for their care. If the Department of Defense is forced to lower its end 

strength levels to cut personnel costs, VA funding must be raised accordingly to account for the large influx of new Veterans into their system. AFSA is very concerned 

with VA’s ability to meet the needs of America’s transitioning Veterans including 

employment initiatives to help our Veterans find jobs during these challenging economic times. We will monitor this transition very carefully, and trust the Members 

of these Committees will as well. 

No patriot should be turned away or have their benefits delayed and it is imperative that VA is provided the full complement of resources to address this shift in 

the Nation’s obligation. Equally important is the timeliness of VA funding for all 

VA programs. 

AFSA thanks the Committees for your leadership and steadfast resolve to preserve and protect Veterans’ health care and benefits. We are particularly grateful 

for the more recent establishment of the advance appropriations authority for VA 

health care funding. Advance Appropriations have allowed the VA to maintain robust health care services for our Nation’s Veterans in this most difficult fiscal climate. We strongly support legislation introduced by House Chairman Jeff Miller 

and Ranking Member Mike Michaud to fully fund the discretionary budget of 

the Veterans Affairs Department one full year in advance. H.R. 813 would 

make it easier for VA to plan for key investments in information technology, benefits claims processing and construction projects. It also would ensure that all VA 

services will have timely, predictable funding in an era where continuing resolutions 

and threats of government shutdowns are all too frequent. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

41 

Passing this legislation will ensure funding for Veterans programs do not become 

a casualty of the legislative paralysis we are experiencing lately. It is up to you, 

the members of these Committees, to protect the care and benefits our Veterans 

have earned for their service. The ‘‘Putting Veterans Funding First Act of 2013’’ is 

a common-sense approach to ensure arbitrary budget cuts don’t jeopardize the care 

and benefits America has promised our Veterans and I want to thank Mr. Miller 

and Michaud publicly for introducing this legislation. I hope the remainder of you 

will find it appropriate to support their efforts. 

Sequestration: I want to touch briefly on the subject of sequestration. Like our 

partner Associations represented here today, we are concerned how this could affect 

the availability of Veterans’ benefits now and in the future. We were somewhat relieved with the White House Office of Management and Budget’s recent announcement that that the entire Veterans Affairs Department’s budget is exempt from sequestration, but feel it will take time before we understand sequestrations true impact on Veteran’s programs. The Administration cannot say with certainty that Veterans’ benefits won’t be affected because many of VA’s efforts are closely tied to 

those of other federal agencies who are subject to sequestration. For instance, the 

Department of Labor’s Veterans Employment and Training Service now see their 

budgets cut under sequestration and this could affect VA’s transition support services. Likewise, cuts to the Department of Housing and Urban Development will result in a reduction of vouchers that are used to house homeless Veterans. VA has 

made tremendous progress in lowering the number of homeless Veterans on our 

streets and it would be an absolute shame if sequestration undermined these herculean efforts by Secretary Shinseki. Last but not least, we are sincere in the hope 

that our Nations leaders can reach an agreement soon on a plan that helps control 

the budget deficit without adversely affecting those who serve in our military or our 

Veterans. Our members have made it clear they just want to see a solution that 

works, and they are frustrated because they want to be sure of what’s going to happen to themselves and their families. Please do all you can to help provide this certainty for them. 

VETERANS HEALTH CARE 

Integrated Electronic Health Record (iEHR): Secretary of Defense Panetta 

and Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki recently announced plans to ditch 

their two department’s efforts to develop a single, bi-directional electronic health 

record as they and many of their predecessors have pledged to do. Like many of you, 

we were very disappointed to learn of their decision. The two departments now plan 

to retain their respective systems but continue to exchange common medical data. 

We share Chairman Miller’s frustration on this issue! 

Conceived as a simple goal to improve the care of Veterans, this is something 

seemingly well within the grasp of modern technology but instead has wasted $1 

billion taxpayer dollars. Now DoD and VA’s action have veterans wondering why the 

two departments are throwing in the towel on this important endeavor. 

This is not the first time the two departments have stepped back from an effort 

like this. Plans to create an iEHR go back to the mid 1980s at least. Numerous 

times the effort has been set aside usually followed by a new pledge, publically and 

with vigor, that the two Secretaries plan to ‘‘resolve this problem once and for all.’’ 

At some point the superfluous hype begins to lose its meaning. 

In the end it all boils down to leadership, or the lack thereof. If DoD and VA are 

truly committed to making the joint electronic health record a reality, we would 

have one by now. Civilian healthcare systems have one, why can’t we? 

An iEHR remains critical for continuity of health care, VA claims processing, 

transparency, and because of the enormous demand for mental health care and 

other medical services arising from the drawdown of forces in Afghanistan and 

scheduled cuts in our Armed Forces. AFSA recommends the Committees’ direct a 

comprehensive review of the accomplishments, current plans and future of the integrated Electronic Health Record project, and re-commit to the successful completion 

of an iEHR at the earliest practicable date. 

Suicide Prevention and Mental Health Services: The mental health and 

well-being of our courageous men and women who have served the Nation should 

be the highest priority for VA, and even one suicide is one too many. The tragic loss 

of Veterans who have served in the Armed Forces including members of the National Guard and Reserves to suicide is arguably the most challenging issue facing 

the VA. Although a report released by VA last month indicates that the percentage 

of Veterans who die by suicide has decreased slightly since 1999, the estimated total 

number of Veterans who have died by suicide has increased so clearly more effort 

is needed to break this trend. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

42 

We were very grateful for Congress including suicide prevention and resilience 

provisions in the FY 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). We thank 

the former Chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, Senator Patty Murray 

(D–WA) for her tireless efforts on this issue. 

However, the provisions in Senator Murray’s ‘‘Mental Health Care Access Act of 

2012’’ adopted for currently serving women and men were not considered for the VA 

health system. Nor has action been taken on the provisions that specifically direct 

the VA to ‘‘develop and implement a comprehensive set of measures to evaluate 

mental health care services furnished by the Department of Veterans Affairs. These 

include measures to assess the timeliness of the furnishing of mental health care 

by the Department; the satisfaction of patients who receive mental health care services provided by VA; and the capacity of VA to furnish to furnish mental health 

care. VA is currently engaged in a commendable, aggressive hiring campaign to expand 

access to mental health services with 1,600 new clinical staff, 300 new administrative staff, and is in the process of hiring and training 800 peer-to-peer specialists 

who will work as members of mental health teams. We strongly support these efforts. 

VA’s 24/7 suicide prevention hotline has proved to be effective by extending the 

Department’s reach to more at-risk Veterans. I’m told the phones never stop ringing 

and in its five-plus years of existence, the crisis line has fielded more than 750,000 

calls and more importantly has helped save some 26,000 callers on the brink of taking their own lives. Staffing at the center has grown from 13 to 300, and some, but 

not all, of the counselors are Veterans. The number of phone lines has increased 

from 3 to 30 but not all of the callers are Veterans. Besides handling calls from or 

about Veterans, the crisis line fields calls from Active Duty service members serving 

all around the world. These facts alone lend evidence of the scope of the problem 

the department faces. 

Despite the success of the hotline, we remain concerned that outreach efforts like 

this and community coordination efforts need to be increased and targeted at providing care and services when and where Veterans need it—not necessarily when 

and where the VA says they need it as was noted at a recent House Veterans’ Affairs Committee hearing on mental health. AFSA urges the Committees to continue 

to support funds to expand VA’s mental health capacity, and to improve oversight, 

accountability and responsiveness in the areas of access, timeliness, quality, delivery, and follow-on care and information. Witnesses at a recent mental health hearing reported that it’s time for change and VA simply cannot continue to do ‘‘business 

as usual.’’ The Department must aggressively pursue outside assistance to be certain that every Veteran needing mental-cognitive services is not just handed over 

to a system, but handed over to an actual person who will arrange for short and 

long-term mental health care. Any expert in the field of mental health could tell you 

how crucial this live hand-off is for a Veteran contemplating taking his or her own 

life. 

Expansion efforts and funds should include marketing and outreach to encourage 

enrollment of eligible Veterans, with particular emphasis on rural Veterans and 

high risk populations. Further, we recommend the Committees review and adopt 

pertinent provisions for suicide prevention and resilience as enacted for the actively 

serving force in Sections 579 through 583 of the FY 2013 NDAA to enhance the Department’s support to Veterans. We support the rapid expansion of partnerships between the VA and outside mental health care providers like those in TRICARE networks and state-level programs. VA should pursue new ways to deliver mental 

health services, including establishing protocols with DoD to seamlessly transfer 

high risk service members with mental health or drug or alcohol abuse conditions 

directly (live hand-off) to a designated VA or partner provider prior to discharge 

from the military to ensure continuity of care. We ask that you to support additional 

funding for collaborative, mid- long-term research between DoD and VA on mental 

health care, and encourage you to conduct an oversight hearing to assess the effectiveness of implementation of Executive Order 13625, ‘‘Improving Access to Mental 

Health Services for Veterans, Service Members, and Military Families’’ and determine other actions that may be needed. Again, one suicide is too many. We need 

to do all we can to ensure the mental well-being of our Veterans before we can ever 

hope to curb the tragedy of Veterans taking their own lives. 

Wounded Warriors: Thousands of service members have been wounded in action 

over the past twelve years. Thousands of others have suffered service-connected illness and injuries in related support actions. As a Nation, we have no greater responsibility than to care for our warriors now suffering from the maladies of war. 

We are pleased high levels of funding for Wounded Warrior care and hope this trend 

never wanes. Continued emphasis and funding is needed for VA programs that adVACREP180 with DISTILLER

43 

dress Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), the 

two ‘‘signature injuries’’ of the most current conflicts. Oftentimes TBI and PTSD do 

not produce visible signs until long after the battle is over. Nor are they easy to 

treat. There is no ‘‘one size fits all’’ treatment and VA must research and ensure 

a variety of effective ones are readily available. At the same time, greater numbers 

of Veterans are returning from the battlefield with significant visual and auditoryimpairments. We are concerned that VA may not have adequate resources to address the influx of Veterans with auditory and visual disabilities, and believe this 

area of care merits further study by these Committees. 

Care for Women Veterans: We applaud the actions of your Committees in recent years for championing women Veteran issues! The unique health care requirements of women Veterans must be addressed with a sense of higher urgency from 

Congress. According to a recent VA Fact Sheet, more than 1.8 of the Nations 22.2 

million Veterans are women. Currently, women make up more than 19 percent of 

the active duty Air Force and approximately 21 percent of the Air Force Reserve. 

We currently have more than 214,000 women serving in the DoD today, many of 

whom served in Iraq and Afghanistan. Of those who have served, VA estimates that 

more than 40 percent have already enrolled for healthcare, a percentage that is expected to double in the next 20 years. They too, suffer from the same effects of battle as many of their fellow male service members; such as PTSD, TBI, and Wounded 

Warrior issues that come with wearing the uniform. While these and many other 

conditions are indiscriminate of sex, the fact remains that there are needs unique 

to females in and after service. As the number of women Veteran’s increases, VA 

must not only be funded accordingly to meet their specific health care needs, but 

program developments must also match the shifting demographic. 

Defense Centers of Excellence: VA should actively support the efforts of many 

Defense Centers of Excellence (DCOE) which have been created to address specific 

areas of military related medicine. Their participation with each of the individual 

DCOE’s will contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of the many types of severe 

injuries Veterans are experiencing as a result of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Family Caregivers: Thanks to the past work of the Committees, catastrophically 

disabled OEF/OIF veterans whose spouses serve as primary care givers, receive additional allowances due to the severity of their service-connected multiple disabilities. Spouses who are full-time caregivers are precluded from earning a retirement 

or Social Security benefits in their own right. However, when the veteran dies, the 

widow(er)’s income is reduced to the same Dependency and Indemnity compensation 

rate that other surviving spouses of veterans receive when the death was service 

connected. The percentage of replacement income can be as little as 15 percent 

whereas the income replacement of other federal survivor benefit plans is closer to 

50 percent. To ensure fairness, AFSA recommends the Committees increase the income replacement rate for widow(er) s of catastrophically disabled veterans to a 

more appropriate level. 

At the same time, AFSA strongly supports the full expansion of the caregiver program to include Veterans of other engagements. There should be no distinction in 

the sacrifices made by a severely disabled Veteran or their family, regardless of 

where or when they served. The service of our Veterans from previous wars must 

be honored similarly, and we encourage Congress to pass legislation that expands 

caregiver benefits to Veterans of all eras. 

Support the judicious use of VA–DoD sharing arrangements: AFSA supports the judicious use of VA–DoD sharing arrangements involving network inclusion in the DoD health care program, especially when it includes consolidating physical examinations at the time of separation. It makes no sense to order a full physical exam on your retirement from the military and then within 30 days, the VA 

orders its own complete physical exam with most of the same exotic and expensive 

exams. The decision to end that duplication process represents a good, commonsense approach that should eliminate problems of inconsistency, save time, and take 

care of Veterans in a timely manner. Initiatives like this will save funding dollars. 

However, AFSA recommends that these Committees closely monitor the collaboration process to ensure these sharing projects actually improve access and quality of 

care for eligible beneficiaries. DoD beneficiary participation in VA facilities must 

never endanger the scope or availability of care for traditional VA patients, nor 

should any VA–DoD sharing arrangement jeopardize access and/or treatment of 

DoD health services beneficiaries. One example of a successful joint sharing arrangement is the clinic with ambulatory care services in Colorado Springs, Colorado. 

This will aid the large number of Veterans remaining in the area and support the 

increases in Colorado Springs as a result of BRAC initiatives. The VA and DoD each 

have a lengthy and comprehensive history of agreeing to work on such projects, but 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

44 

follow-through is lacking. We urge these Committees to encourage joint VA–DoD efforts, but ask you to exercise close oversight to ensure such arrangements are implemented properly. 

Support VA Subvention: With more than 40 percent of Veterans eligible for 

Medicare, VA–Medicare subvention is a very promising venture, and AFSA offers 

support for this effort. Under this plan, Medicare would reimburse the VA for care 

the VA provides to non-disabled Medicare-eligible Veterans at VA medical facilities. 

This funding method would, no doubt, enhance elderly Veterans’ access to VA health 

care and enhance access for many Veterans. 

Other Healthcare Issues: Other Veteran’s health-care issues not addressed in 

this statement but included in our Associations top priorities are: 

• Limit user fees and prescription co-pay increases at VA medical facilities • Require the VA to accept licensed civilian medical/dental provider prescriptions • Pursue the VA to have chiropractic care where possible 

GENERAL VETERANS ISSUES 

Disability Claims and Backlog: As the saying goes the biggest house in the 

room is the room for improvement and nowhere in VA does this adage hold more 

truth than in the area of claims processing. When I addressed the Committees last 

March there were 1.4 million total claims pending (initial, secondary, appeals, education, pension, etc.). Today that figure is closer to two million and this lack of 

progress just goes to show that throwing more money and people at a problem 

doesn’t always guarantee success. 

To their credit, VA processed over one million claims last year but it has been 

unable to catch up to the rising demand. With the prospect of thousands of service 

members being forced to separate as a result of budget cuts, this problem is likely 

to get worse before its gets better. Frankly that disturbs me because for many Veterans, association with the VA begins with the claims process. AFSA supports a 

comprehensive, integrated strategy for improving the claims-management system 

with primary emphasis on quality decisions at the initial stage of the process. I 

don’t profess to be an expert here, but I am aware larger VSOs have already made 

recommendations to these Committees in this area—changes my organization can 

and will support. One suggestion I do have lies in the area of the accuracy of claims 

processing because we should be focused on the ‘‘quality’’ of claims, not just the 

‘‘quantity.’’ I’m told the accuracy rate of completed claims at some regional facilities 

barely eclipses 50 percent where others reach upwards of 90 percent or more. The 

latter facilities clearly have a winning model and we should benchmark this process 

across all facilities. Instead of throwing more resources (money, people) at facilities 

with less than satisfactory ratings, we should bolster the capacity at facilities with 

high performance ratings then shift some of the workload there. 

Transition Assistance Program: The ‘‘VOW To Hire Heroes Act’’ made the 

Transition Assistance Program, or TAP as it’s commonly referred to, mandatory for 

service members. This interagency workshop is coordinated by the Departments of 

Defense, Labor and Veterans Affairs to help them secure meaningful employment 

at the end of their service. We appreciate the efforts of your committees to make 

sure all separating members receive this important transition benefit. At the same 

time, AFSA is concerned that the content of TAP has changed very little in the last 

25 years. We understand the Department of Labor plans to unveil a new program 

in the near future, and we encourage Members of Congress to ensure it provides 

Veterans with information and tools that are current, relevant and useful for successful transition into the civilian sector. We hope the new program will place greater emphasis on the participation of military spouses because they too play a key role 

in the successful transition of the entire military family. 

Policy Consistency: We appreciate your Committees’ efforts to reduce the pervading feeling among Veterans that our government’s approach to providing adequate service to an ever-growing number of Veterans is to shrink the number of patients by excluding more classes of Veterans. Please continue to resist any effort 

that limits Priority 8 Veterans who deserve to have the VA option available to them. 

Provide a Written Guarantee: Many Veterans are frustrated and disappointed 

because existing programs they thought they could depend on have been altered or 

eliminated due to changing budget philosophies. That has created a perception 

among service members and Veterans that the covenant between the Nation and 

the military member is one-sided—with the military member/Veteran always honoring his/her obligation, and hoping that the government does not change the law 

or the benefits upon which they depend. We urge your Committees to support a 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

45 

guarantee in writing of benefits to which Veterans are legally entitled by virtue of 

their service. This would demonstrate that the government is prepared to be honest 

and consistent with its obligation to its service members and ‘‘Keep America’s Promise to America’s Military ‘‘ 

State Veterans Homes: The State Veterans Home program has proven itself to 

be the most cost-effective source of high quality long-term health care services for 

the Nation’s Veterans who need skilled nursing, domiciliary, adult day health care 

and other specialized programs to meet their needs. The cost of providing care at 

these facilities is roughly half of what it cost for VA. Last year these Committees 

were instrumental in passing the ‘‘Honoring America’s Veterans and Caring for 

Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012’’ which authorized the VA to enter into contracts or agreements with State homes, to pay for nursing home care provided to 

certain Veterans with service-connected disabilities. This provision was authored by 

Ranking Member Michaud and Chairman Miller and on behalf of the thousands of 

Veterans residing in these homes I thank you for this important quality of life 

change. 

Additional savings are possible by allowing similar reimbursement of adult day 

health care services at State Veteran Homes. Adult day care is integral part of the 

continuum of care for our Veterans and this change would help to preserve their 

individual choice and independence. Currently only three states have adult day 

health care programs within their facilities but plans are in the works at other state 

homes to provide this care in the future. The VA is already reimbursing community 

nursing homes for adult day health care to service-connected disabled Veterans Nationally and the department has established a prevailing rate for skilled nursing 

care at all State Veterans Homes. Therefore we recommend that the VA reimburse 

all State Veterans Homes providing adult day health care at 65 percent of the prevailing rate for a daily visit. And we urge the Veterans Administration to include 

adult day health care under the existing VA–SVH provider agreements thereby providing full cost of care to Veterans with service-connected disabilities. The long overdue regulation in this area is hampering State Veterans Homes from full implementation. Why does it take the VA nearly 4 years to write a regulation? 

On a related matter, every state operates at least one State Veterans Home, and 

more are planned or projected annually to meet a growing demand of long term care 

programs and facilities for American’s elderly, sick and disabled Veterans. Subchapter III of Chapter 81, Title 38, United States Code, authorizes the State Extended Care Facilities Grant Program, funded by VA through congressional appropriations, to assist the States through grants for construction of new State Veterans 

Homes and for significant renovations of existing facilities, at a cost not to exceed 

65 percent of the total cost of any such project proposed by a State and approved 

by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. Currently there are $322 million in Priority 

One projects and $752 million total in grant applications waiting funding, but last 

year the Administration requested $85 million for that program. It doesn’t take a 

rocket scientist to figure out at that rate we won’t get the state home program 

where it needs to be at that rate. Again, it is difficult to make a recommendation 

in the absence of a FY 2014 Budget Proposal so this Association simply asks that 

you consider providing a greater level of funding for the program in FY 2014—at 

least $100 million in order for the Department of Veterans Affairs and several 

states to help reduce the structural backlog of worthwhile projects. 

Protect VA Disability Compensation: Despite being clearly stated in law, Veterans’ disability compensation has become an easy target for former spouses and 

lawyers seeking money. This has been allowed to transpire despite the fact the law 

states that Veterans’ benefits ‘‘shall not be liable to attachment, levy, or seizure by 

or under any legal or equitable process, whatever, either before or after receipt by 

the beneficiary.’’ Once a rare occurrence, we hear this is happening with increasing 

frequency. Now is the time to consider enactment of a specific probation to preclude 

the award of VA disability dollars to former spouses or third parties during civil 

proceedings. 

Homeless Veterans: Fighting in a war can be a harrowing experience, but imagine coming back and not being able to find a home. Although flawless counts are 

impossible to come by, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 

(HUD) estimates that 62,619 Veterans are homeless on any given night—down from 

about 67,500 one year ago. Over the course of a year, approximately twice that number may experience homelessness. Only 7 percent of the general population can 

claim Veteran status, but nearly 13 percent of the homeless adult populations are 

Veterans. Of particular concern are homeless Veterans that have young children because we understand their numbers are increasing. Another at risk group are 

younger vets—those who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan because unemployVACREP180 with DISTILLER

46 

ment rates in this group are much higher than the National average. Now we learn 

of homeless female Veterans to add to the woes. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs is taking decisive action to end Veteran 

homelessness by 2015 and it is clear their efforts are having a positive effect on this 

problem. Thanks to your efforts, the department has the resources it needs to provide numerous opportunities for Veterans to return to employment which is an important element in preventing homelessness. Compensated Work Therapy (CWT) is 

comprised of three unique programs which assist homeless Veterans in returning 

to competitive employment: Sheltered Workshop, Transitional Work, and Supported 

Employment. Veterans in CWT are paid at least the federal or state minimum 

wage, whichever is the higher. The Homeless Veteran Supported Employment Program (HVSEP) provides vocational assistance, job development and placement, and 

ongoing supports to improve employment outcomes among homeless Veterans and 

Veterans at-risk of homelessness. Formerly homeless Veterans who have been 

trained as Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists (VRSs) provide these services. 

In terms of providing direct housing support, VA’s Homeless Providers Grant and 

Per Diem Program provides grants and per diem payments (as funding is available) 

to help public and nonprofit organizations establish and operate supportive housing 

and service centers for homeless Veterans. This important partnership goes far in 

reducing the number of homeless vets on our streets each night. The HUD–VA Supportive Housing (VASH) Program is a joint effort between the Department of Housing and Urban Development and VA. HUD has allocated nearly 38,000 ‘‘Housing 

Choice’’ Section 8 vouchers across the country. These vouchers allow Veterans and 

their families to live in market rate rental units while VA provides case management services. The Acquired Property Sales for Homeless Providers Program makes 

all VA foreclosed properties available for sale to homeless provider organizations— 

at a 20 to 50 percent discount—to shelter homeless Veterans. And the Supportive 

Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program provides grants and technical assistance to community-based, nonprofit organizations to help Veterans and their families stay in their homes. 

VA’s Health Care for Homeless Veterans (HCHV) Program offers outreach, exams, 

treatment, referrals, and case management to Veterans who are homeless and dealing with mental health issues, including substance use. Offered at 135 facilities nation-wide, this program and others like it are helping to meet the healthcare needs 

of our homeless Veterans. More can be done and will be needed if we truly hope 

to eradicate the Nations homeless program once and for all. 

Legitimate, Sincere Veterans Preference: Commendable moves in recent 

years by VA and the Department of Labor have enhanced the job preferences available to Veterans. However, we need to ensure that OPM guidelines that allow selective hiring practices within the federal government are removed. Some Veteran applications are never even considered for employment in the federal government, due 

to allowed restrictive qualification wording and narrowed hiring practices. We continue to urge your Committees to support any improvement that will put ‘‘teeth’’ 

into such programs so that those who have served have a ‘‘leg up’’ when 

transitioning back into the civilian workforce. 

Additionally we hope these Committees will look at ways how the additional 5 

Veterans preference points given to disabled Veterans can be extended to those who 

are clearly eligible, but do not yet have a completed claim by VA. Wounded Warriors 

aside, if a military member stood before you, absent an arm as a result of their military service, why on God’s green earth do they need to fill out paperwork to prove 

there are a disabled Vet and entitled to the full 10 points? Current statues require 

a determination by VA before the additional points can be given. With claims processing taking years to complete, that’s an awful long time to make someone wait 

for the addition consideration. It’s unnecessary and this simple action would complement the work of the Administration and these Committees to enhance employment opportunities for our Veterans. 

Concurrent Receipt: AFSA continues its advocacy for legislation that provides 

concurrent receipt of military retired pay and Veterans’ disability compensation for 

all disabled retirees without offset. Under current statues, retirees with 50 percent 

or greater disabilities will receive their full retired pay and VA disability in FY 

2014. We were pleased with language Congress approved in the FY 2013 National 

Defense Authorization Act that fixed a long-standing glitch in the current statutory 

formula that underpaid (and in some cases eliminated any payment) of Combat-Related Special Compensation for combat-disabled military retirees. Congress should 

now focus on eliminating this unjust offset for Veterans with lesser disabilities and 

in particular, individuals who were medically retired with less than 20 years of 

service due to a service-connected illness or injury. They are not treated equally! 

Currently 3 bills have been introduced in the 113th Congress to address this issue. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

47 

They are: H.R. 303, H.R. 333, and S. 234 by Representative Gus Bilirakis (R–FL), 

Representative Sanford Bishop (D–GA), and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D– 

NV) respectively. I understand the issue of concurrent receipt actually falls under 

the purview of the Armed Services Committees, but it is so closely linked with the 

efforts of these Committees, I urge you to support it as well. 

Veterans Status for Certain Reserve Component Members: AFSA supports 

full Veteran status for Reserve component members with 20 years or more of service, who do not otherwise qualify for Veterans status under current law. Due to military funding and accounting protocols, many reservists performed operational missions during their careers but the orders purposely were issued under other than 

Title 10 authority to comply with funding and accounting protocols. Ironically, these 

career reservists have earned specified veterans’ benefits, but they can’t claim that 

they are veterans—at least not by the letter of the law. 

In October 2011 the House passed H.R. 1025, which was introduced by Representative Tim Walz (D–MN) to address this issue but the Senate did not approve that 

bill or its companion measure introduced by Senator Mark Pryor (D–AR). Representative Walz has reintroduced his legislation; H.R. 679. Passing this bill will not 

cost a penny; it does not extend any benefit to these individuals that they have not 

already earned. It simply bestows upon them the honorarium of being called a veteran. The House is likely to pass the bill again this year so I urge the Senate to 

take a hard look at this legislation and stop denying these individuals the dignity 

of being called a veteran. 

Retirement Benefits: Last year the Administration’s FY 2013 budget proposal 

called for higher TRICARE fees, the establishment of new ones and the creation of 

a BRAC-like panel that will review current military compensation and recommend 

changes (most likely reductions) for Congress to consider. The President, some Members of Congress and many senior civilian leaders repeatedly said they will ‘‘not balance the budget on the backs of Veterans.’’ 

With roughly 20 percent of Congress having served in the military, the Legislative 

Branch far exceeds the National average in that only 1 percent of US Citizens have 

served in the military. Unfortunately that means that 80 percent of Congress and 

99 percent of the Nation don’t understand one subtle, but ever so important nuance 

of military service. 

A Veteran is someone who has dedicated their life to their country. 

A military retiree is a Veteran who has dedicated a lifetime. 

A military retiree should be treated as a National treasure and senior military 

leaders often speak of the importance of ‘‘keeping the faith’’ with military members 

- particularly where earned benefits are concerned. Benefits like retired pay and 

healthcare. Right now, Airmen are asking ‘‘Where is the faith?’’ And they are looking to you, the Members of Congress, to provide that answer. A large portion of the 

success of the all-volunteer force can be directly attributed to the benefits we provide military members in return for their service and sacrifice, regardless of length. 

It will only serve to undermine long-term retention and readiness when current 

service men and women hear the talk of how their predecessors . . . the Veterans, 

the military retirees, the National treasures . . . might get treated by their country 

instead of fulfilling their promised benefits. 

Stolen Valor of 2013: Those who serve our country in uniform take a solemn 

vow to protect this nation and put their lives on the line so we can continue to enjoy 

the freedoms we have today. They deserve our honor; our respect, our support and 

our prayers but they do not deserve to have their service and sacrifice devalued and 

desecrated by impostors. Too many in this country wrongfully claim military service 

or high military honors in order to garner unearned benefits like a job, a donation, 

political favors or a scholarship for their children. H.R. 258 by Representative Joe 

Heck (R–NV) and S. 210 by Senator Dean Heller (R–NV) will help keep these 

scammers in check by making it illegal to benefit by lying about military service 

or detract from an honored veteran’s accomplishments. 

POW/MIAs: AFSA remains committed to provide the fullest possible accounting 

of missing military members from all past and future military actions, and promotes 

international compliance in recovery efforts. We urge the members of these Committees to fully support and fund the efforts of the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command (JPAC), a joint task force within DoD whose mission is to account for Americans who are listed as Prisoners Of War (POW), or Missing in Action (MIA). 

Full accounting of those Missing in Action is not just a term for us, it is a commitment to the memory of those missing in action and their families. We, as a Nation, 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

48 

owe these families our very best efforts to account for all missing members of our 

Armed Forces. 

SUPPORT OF SURVIVORS 

SBP/DIC Offset: With current military deployments and increasing casualties, it 

is imperative that we plan to properly take care of those who may be left behind 

if a military member makes the ultimate sacrifice. We commend these Committees 

for previous legislation, which allowed retention of Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC), burial entitlements, and VA home loan eligibility for surviving 

spouses who remarry after age 57. However, we strongly recommend the age-57 DIC 

remarriage provision be reduced to age 55 to make it consistent with all other federal survivor benefit programs. 

We also endorse the view that surviving spouses with military Survivor Benefit 

Plan (SBP) annuities should be able to concurrently receive earned SBP benefits 

and DIC payments related to their sponsor’s service-connected death. AFSA has 

SBP–DIC offset repeal as their #1 focus item for survivors! We want to thank Congressman Joe Wilson, (R–SC) for introducing H.R. 32 in the 113th Congress which 

addresses this issue as well as the 70 cosponsors who have already endorsed this 

effort. I’m told Senator Bill Nelson (D–FL) plans to reintroduce a Senate companion 

bill soon and I urge the members of the Senate to cosponsor that bill as well. 

Special Survivor Indemnity Allowance: The fiscal year 2008 NDAA (Public 

Law 110–181) created the Special Survivor Indemnity Allowance (SSIA) for surviving spouses’ whose military Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuities were being offset, in whole or in part, by Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) which 

are paid by the Department of Veterans Affairs. It also applies to the widows of 

members who died on active duty whose SBP annuity is partially or fully offset by 

their DIC. Congress approved this legislation in lieu of repealing the SBP/DIC offset. 

SSIA began as a $50 monthly payment on October 1, 2008, and was scheduled to increase by $10 each year through 2013 when the benefit expired. In 2009, a provision in the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Public Law No: 

111–31) extended the allowance another five years and increased projected monthly 

rates. Provisions in the House version of FY 2012 NDAA would have extended the 

benefit through 2021, and raise monthly rates slightly through FY 2017, but the 

provision was dropped in Joint Conference. Needless to say we were disappointed 

with this action and continue to call on Members of Congress to eliminate this unjust offset altogether. 

CHAMPVA Dental Plan Participation: AFSA supports a plan that allows Survivors qualified for CHAMPVA health care to be allowed to enroll in a proposed 

CHAMPVA Dental program. The proposal, which is modeled on the TRICARE Retiree Dental Plan, would have no PAYGO offset requirement since it would be fully 

funded by enrollees’ premiums. 

Final Paycheck: Finally, it is time to end the government’s practice of electronically withdrawing the last paycheck of military retirees upon their death. Automatically withdrawing these funds can inadvertently cause essential payments to bounce 

and place great financial strain on a beneficiary already faced with the prospect of 

additional costs associated with their loved one’s death. In the 112th Congress Congressman Walter Jones, (R–NC) introduced H.R. 493, the ‘‘Military Retiree Survivor 

Comfort Act,’’ which would allow survivors to retain the full month’s retired pay for 

any month the retiree was alive for at least 24 hours. To offset the cost associated 

with his proposal, a provision of the bill would delay the first Survivor Benefit Plan 

(SBP) annuity payment until the month after the retiree dies. Congress passed a 

similar law in 1996 allowing surviving spouses to retain Veterans disability and VA 

pension payments issued for the month of the Veteran’s death. AFSA strongly believes military retired pay should be treated no differently. 

CEMETERIES 

National Cemeteries: VA’s National Cemetery Administration (NCA) is responsible for providing final honors to many of our Nation Veterans. Thanks to your efforts, many expansion projects and construction projects have been completed, are 

underway or are being planned to ensure everyone who served this Nation in uniform has a final resting place. However we urge your continued oversight of the system to ensure the Nations solemn obligations in this area are maintained. 

Clark Veterans Cemetery: We applaud the recent passage of legislation authored by Senator Kelly Ayotte (R–NH) that authorizes the restoration of the Veterans Cemetery at former Clark Air Force Base in the Philippines and places it 

under the care of the American Battlefields Monuments Commission (ABMC). This 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

49 

cemetery was established in 1948 by moving remains and head stones of over 7,000 

graves from several older U.S. military base cemeteries located throughout the Philippines to include Fort McKinley in Manila, Sangley Point Naval Station and two 

cemeteries located on Fort Stotsenberg. Over 5,000 alone were disinterred from the 

old Fort McKinley cemetery to make room for a new World War II American Military Cemetery and Memorial on the same site, forever linking the Clark and new 

Manila Cemetery. The Air Force continued military burials at Clark until November 

1991. The CVC then fell into disrepair with overgrown vegetation, vandalism, ash 

damage and looting. In 1994 the local VFW Post restored the cemetery as best they 

could and began a program of maintenance as well as burial of our Veterans. Today, 

over 8,600 American Veterans and their families are interred, Veterans who served 

in every war since the Civil War, to include the Iraq War. For years it was an abandoned and forgotten American Military Cemetery with over a hundred years of history as rich as any other of our Nation’s military cemeteries. I know the very recent 

funding and responsibility changes will fix the problems and I applaud Chairman 

Miller and Vice Chair Bilirakis for going to the Clark Cemetery during the recent 

congressional recess to assess the problems there first-hand. 

EDUCATION 

Post 9/11 GI Bill: Arguably the best piece of legislation ever passed by Congress 

in recent times and thanks to the efforts of many of you here, the Post-9/11 GI Bill 

(Chapter 33) is providing unprecedented educational opportunities for thousands of 

men and women who served in uniform since 9/11 and many of their family members. Last year VA provided educational benefits to nearly a million students with 

more than half of the recipients receiving their education via the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 

We are especially grateful for the bi-partisan and bi-cameral effort that resulted 

in final passage of H.R.4057, the ‘‘Improving Transparency of Education Opportunities for Veterans Act of 2012.’’ This important legislation directs access to upgraded 

information resources for Veterans so they make smart choices about their education, improves reporting on outcomes and strengthens oversight of all institutions 

receiving GI Bill funding. Each of these will go far in ensuring the best stewardship 

of our tax dollars. 

AFSA asks the Committees to consider other potential improvements to the Post 

9/11 GI Bill these include: 

• Authorizing in-state tuition rates for all non-resident student Veterans enrolled 

in public colleges and universities; • Allowing use of Post 9/11 benefits to cover costs required in the pursuit of a 

degree; • Expanding the VetSuccess On Campus program so that more Veterans can get 

benefit from academic and career counseling support; • Amending the educational counseling provisions in Chapter 36, 38 U.S.C. to 

mandate such counseling via appropriate means, including modern technologies, 

and permit Veterans to opt out of the program; • Raising the $6 million cap in the counseling provision to meet the enormous demand of new GI Bill enrollments; and • Requiring all programs receiving funding under the GI Bill be ‘‘Title IV’’ eligible. In other words, post-secondary academic programs should be required to 

meet Department of Education accreditation and other requirements 

Providing in-state tuition rates at federally supported State universities and colleges–regardless of residency requirements, is an important goal for AFSA due to 

the mobile nature of the military. 

Education Benefits for Survivors and Dependents: VA’s Survivors & Dependents Assistance (DEA) Program (Chapter 35) provides education and training 

opportunities to the spouse and eligible children of certain Veterans. Whereas most 

VA educational programs increased payment rates in recent years, the DEA program has not. As a result, the value of this benefit continues to erode as college 

costs continue to climb. Congress should boost these rates to closely match the current cost of a four-year public university. 

CONCLUSION 

Chairman Sanders, Chairman Miller, in conclusion, I want to thank you again for 

this opportunity to express the views of our members on these important issues as 

you consider the FY 2014 budget. We realize that those charged as caretakers of 

the taxpayers’ money must budget wisely and make decisions based on many factors. As tax dollars must be prioritized, the degree of difficulty deciding what can 

be addressed, and what cannot, grows significantly. However, AFSA contends it is 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

50 

of paramount importance for a Nation to provide quality health care and top-notch 

benefits in exchange for the devotion, sacrifice, and service of military members during their prime adult working years, particularly while the Nation remains at war. 

So too, must those making the decisions take into consideration the decisions of the 

past, the trust of those who are impacted, and the negative consequences upon those 

who have based their trust in our government. 

We sincerely believe the work the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees 

do is among the most important on the Hill. Year after year, these two Committees 

have illustrated the value of non-political cooperation with the full focus of your efforts on the well-being of those who have served and are serving this Nation. On 

behalf of all AFSA members, we appreciate your efforts and as always, we stand 

ready to support you in matters of mutual concern. 

The Air Force Sergeants Association looks forward to working with you in this 

first Session of the 113th Congress. 

Respectfully submitted this 6th day of March, 2013 

f 

Prepared Statement of Bill Lawson 

Chairman Miller, Chairman Sanders and members of the Committees, I appreciate the opportunity to present the legislative priorities for 2013 of Paralyzed Veterans of America (Paralyzed Veterans). Since its founding, Paralyzed Veterans has 

developed a worthy record of accomplishment, of which we are extremely proud. 

Again, this year, I come before you with our views on the current state of veterans’ 

programs and services and recommendations for continued improvement in the services and benefits provided to veterans. 

BACKGROUND—Paralyzed Veterans was founded in 1946 by a small group of 

returning World War II veterans, all of whom had experienced catastrophic spinal 

cord injury and who were consigned to various military hospitals throughout the 

country. Realizing that neither the medical profession nor government had ever confronted the needs of such a population, the returning veterans decided to become 

their own advocates and to do so through a national organization. 

From the outset the founders recognized that other elements of society were neither willing nor prepared to address the full range of challenges facing individuals 

with a spinal cord injury, be they medical, social, or economic. Paralyzed Veterans’ 

founders were determined to create an organization that would be governed by the 

members, themselves, and address their own unique needs. Being told that their life 

expectancy could be measured in weeks or months, these individuals set as their 

primary goal actions that would maximize the quality of life and opportunity for all 

veterans and individuals with spinal cord injury—it remains so today. 

To achieve its goal over the years, Paralyzed Veterans has established ongoing 

programs of research, sports, service representation to secure our members’ and 

other veterans’ benefits, advocacy in promoting the rights of all citizens with disabilities, architecture promoting accessibility, and communications to educate the public 

about individuals with spinal cord injury. We have also developed long-standing 

partnerships with other veterans’ service organizations. Paralyzed Veterans, along 

with AMVETS, Disabled American Veterans, and the Veterans of Foreign Wars, coauthor The Independent Budget—a comprehensive budget and policy document that 

has been published for 27 years. 

Today, Paralyzed Veterans is the only congressionally chartered veterans’ service 

organization dedicated solely to the benefit and representation of veterans with spinal cord injury or disease. 

SUFFICIENT, TIMELY AND PREDICTABLE FUNDING FOR VA HEALTH 

CARE— As the country faces a difficult and uncertain fiscal future, the Department 

of Veterans Affairs (VA) likewise faces significant challenges ahead. Congress and 

the Administration continue to face immense pressure to reduce federal spending. 

With these thoughts in mind, we cannot emphasize enough the importance of ensuring that sufficient, timely and predictable funding is provided to the VA. We anxiously await the budget submission to be released by the Administration that will 

include funding recommendations for VA programs for FY 2014, the advance appropriation recommendation for FY 2015, and an updated analysis of the funding needs 

for health care programs for FY 2014. 

Meanwhile, Paralyzed Veterans is particularly concerned that the broken appropriations process continues to have a negative impact on the operations of the VA. 

Once again this year Congress failed to fully complete the appropriations process 

in the regular order, instead choosing to fund the federal government through a 6- 

month Continuing Resolution. As a result of the enactment of advance appropriaVACREP180 with DISTILLER

51 

tions, the health care system is generally shielded from the difficulties associated 

with late appropriations (an occurrence that has become the rule, not the exception). 

However, we cannot be certain that health care spending will not be negatively impacted by this 6-month continuing resolution. The unacceptable manner with which 

the FY 2014 advance appropriations funding was handled in the FY 2013 continuing 

resolution reaffirms this concern. 

Moreover, The Independent Budget co-authors remain concerned about steps VA 

has taken in recent years in order to generate resources to meet ever-growing demand on the VA health-care system. The Administration continues to rely upon 

‘‘management improvements,’’ a popular gimmick that was used by previous Administrations to generate savings and offset the growing costs to deliver care. Unfortunately, these savings were often never realized leaving VA short of necessary funding to address ever-growing demand on the health-care system. Additionally, the VA 

continues to overestimate and underperform in its medical care collections. Overestimating collections estimates affords Congress the opportunity to appropriate fewer 

discretionary dollars for the health care system. However, when the VA fails to 

achieve those collections estimates, it is left with insufficient funding to meet the 

projected demand. As long as this scenario continues, the VA will find itself falling 

farther and farther behind in its ability to care for those men and women who have 

served and sacrificed for this nation. 

For FY 2014, The Independent Budget recommends approximately $58.8 billion for 

total medical care, an increase of $3.3 billion over the FY 2013 operating budget. 

Meanwhile, the Administration recommended an advance appropriation for FY 2014 

of approximately $54.4 billion in discretionary funding for VA medical care. When 

combined with the $3.1 billion Administration projection for medical care collections, 

the total available operating budget recommended for FY 2014 is approximately 

$57.5 billion. 

The medical care appropriation includes three separate accounts—Medical Services, Medical Support and Compliance, and Medical Facilities—that comprise the 

total VA health-care funding level. For FY 2014, The Independent Budget recommends approximately $47.4 billion for Medical Services. For Medical Support and 

Compliance, The Independent Budget recommends approximately $5.84 billion. Finally, for Medical Facilities, The Independent Budget recommends approximately 

$5.57 billion. 

As explained previously, P.L. 111–81 required the President’s budget submission 

to include estimates of appropriations for the medical care accounts for FY 2013 and 

subsequent fiscal years. With this in mind, the VA Secretary is required to update 

the advance appropriations projections for the upcoming fiscal year (FY 2014) and 

provide detailed estimates of the funds necessary for the medical care accounts for 

FY 2015. 

For the first time this year, The Independent Budget offers baseline projections 

for funding for the medical care accounts for FY 2015. While we have previously 

deferred to the Administration and Congress to provide sufficient funding through 

the advance appropriations process, we have growing concerns that this responsibility is not being taken seriously. The fact that for two fiscal years in a row the 

Administration recommended funding levels that were not changed in any appreciable way upon review, and the fact that Congress simply signed off on those recommendations without thorough analysis, leads us to conclude that VA funding is 

falling farther and farther behind the growth in demand for services. We believe the 

continued feedback from veterans around the country about long wait times and 

lack of access to services affirms this belief. As such, we have decided to offer our 

own estimates of what we believe the true resource needs will be for the VA health 

care system in FY 2015. 

For FY 2015, The Independent Budget recommends approximately $61.6 billion for 

total medical care. Unfortunately, the Administration has yet to provide its FY 2014 

Budget Request which will include an advance appropriation recommendation for 

FY 2015 for VA health care. For FY 2015, The Independent Budget recommends approximately $49.8 billion for Medical Services. For Medical Support and Compliance, 

The Independent Budget recommends approximately $6.14 billion. Finally, for Medical Facilities, The Independent Budget recommends approximately $5.69 billion. 

Paralyzed Veterans would like to applaud Chairman Miller and Ranking Member 

Michaud for introducing H.R. 813, the ‘‘Putting Veterans Funding First Act of 

2013.’’ This legislation requires all accounts of the VA to be funded through the advance appropriations process. It would provide protection for the operations of the 

entire VA from the political wrangling that occurs as a part of the appropriations 

process every year. Similarly, we would like to thank Representative Brownley for 

introducing H.R. 806, the ‘‘Veterans Healthcare Improvement Act.’’ This legislation 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

52 

permanently establishes the Government Accountability Office’s reporting requirements as a part of VA advance appropriations. 

PROTECTION OF THE VA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, WITH A FOCUS ON 

SPECIALIZED SERVICES—The VA is the best health care provider for veterans. 

Providing primary care and specialized health services is an integral component of 

VA’s core mission and responsibility to veterans. Across the nation, VA is a model 

health care provider that has led the way in various areas of medical research, specialized services, and health care technology. In fact, the VA’s specialized services 

are incomparable resources that often cannot be duplicated in the private sector. 

However, these services are often expensive, and are severely threatened by costcutting measures and the drive toward achieving management efficiencies. 

Over the years, the VA has earned a reputation as a leader in the medical field 

for its quality of care and innovation in both the health care and medical research 

fields. However, even with VA’s advances as a health care provider, some political 

leaders and policy makers continue to advocate expanding health care access for veterans by contracting for services in the community. While we recognize that VA 

must tap into every resource available to ensure that the needs of veterans are 

being met, such changes to the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) would move 

veterans out of the ‘‘veteran-specific’’ care within VA, leading to a diminution of VA 

health care services, and increased health care costs in the federal budget. Despite 

recent calls for providing veterans with increased access through vouchers for private care or the expansion of fee basis care, Paralyzed Veterans strongly believes 

that VA remains the best option available for veterans seeking health care services. 

The VA’s unique system of care is one of the nation’s only health care systems 

that provide developed expertise in a broad continuum of care. Currently, VHA 

serves more than 8 million veterans, and provides specialized health care services 

that include program specific centers for care in the areas of spinal cord injury/disease, blind rehabilitation, traumatic brain injury, prosthetic services, mental health, 

and war-related poly-traumatic injuries. Such quality and expertise on veterans’ 

health care cannot be adequately duplicated in the private sector. 

Moreover, specialized services, such as spinal cord injury care, are part of the core 

mission and responsibility of the VA. These services were initially developed to care 

for the unique health care needs of veterans. The provision of specialized services 

is vital to maintaining a viable VA health care system. Specialized services are part 

of the primary mission of the VA. The erosion of these services would lead to the 

degradation of the larger VA health care mission. Reductions in beds and staff in 

both VA’s acute and extended care settings have been reported, even though Public 

Law 104–262, ‘‘The Veterans’ Health Care Eligibility Reform Act of 1996,’’ mandated that VA maintain its capacity to provide for the special treatment and rehabilitative needs of veterans. In addition, Congress required that VA provide an annual capacity reporting requirement, to be certified or commented upon, by the Inspector General of the Department. Unfortunately, this basic reporting requirement 

expired in 2004. 

With growing pressure to allow veterans to seek care outside of the VA, the VA 

faces the possibility that the critical mass of patients needed to keep all services 

viable could significantly decline. All of the primary care support services are critical to the broader specialized care programs provided to veterans. If primary care 

services decline, then specialized care is also diminished. 

Meanwhile, as VA services are designed specifically to meet the needs of veterans, 

VHA has received excellent ratings from patient satisfaction surveys, and garnered 

much recognition for its national safety program. The VA’s system of patient-centered and coordinated care helps to ensure safe and consistent delivery of services. 

Additionally, independent research organizations have also found VA to be the lowest cost provider when compared to private health care systems. Paralyzed Veterans 

will continue to oppose any efforts that place the VA health care system at risk of 

being unable to properly meet the health care demands of veterans, particularly veterans with spinal cord injury or dysfunction. 

OVERSIGHT OF THE VA PROSTHETICS PROGRAM—The VA Prosthetic 

and Sensory Aids Service (PSAS) has created a prosthetics and surgical products 

contracting center within the VA Office of Acquisition and Logistics that is responsible for ordering prosthetic devices that cost $3000 or more. This change has resulted in delayed delivery of prosthetic devices, the diminution of quality service delivery for disabled veterans, and prolonged hospital stays for veterans waiting for 

prosthetic equipment that they need to safely move forward in the rehabilitation 

process. 

The implementation of the new warrant transition process has not unfolded as 

planned, and an increasing number of veterans are suffering the consequences, languishing in hospitals as in-patients, or at home without their much needed prosVACREP180 with DISTILLER

53 

thetic equipment. The VA is not communicating effectively with veterans and stakeholders in the veteran community to learn of the various ways that this change is 

impacting veterans and the delivery of their care. Paralyzed Veterans believes that 

VA’s new warrant transition process requires more attention than it is currently receiving, and we recommend increased Congressional oversight to bring attention to 

the negative outcomes that have resulted from this change, and identify ways to address the issues. 

Although the warrant transition involves a small percentage of the total workload 

for VHA, this change includes critical prosthetic devices such as artificial limbs, 

wheeled mobility chairs, and surgical implants. Delays in these procurements prove 

costly to both the government, in terms of unnecessarily extended hospital stays 

while awaiting equipment, and veterans, in terms of lost independence and quality 

of life. 

PROTECTING VETERANS BENEFITS WHILE MODERNIZING THE VA 

CLAIMS PROCESS—Paralyzed Veterans believes that VA benefits have no place 

in deficit reduction efforts. VA disability compensation is a benefit provided because 

an individual became disabled in service to the country. In addition, many ancillary 

benefits—particularly Specially Adapted Housing benefits, adaptive automobile assistance, and vocational rehabilitation—are provided to service connected disabled 

veterans. Moreover, education benefits, such as the Post-9/11 GI Bill, are earned 

through service. These benefits reflect the debt of gratitude this nation owes the 

men and women who served in uniform and recognize the challenges they face every 

day as a result of their service. Any attempt to reduce or modify eligibility criteria 

would be considered an abrogation of the responsibility that this nation has to veterans and would be wholly unacceptable. Additionally, reduction in funding for VA 

pension programs would place veterans who live on the financial margins to face 

the prospect of poverty and homelessness. 

Meanwhile, the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) continues to work toward 

reducing the backlog of VA claims, but they must focus on creating a veteran’s benefits claims processing system designed to ‘‘get each claim done right the first time.’’ 

This goal cannot be over emphasized. This system needs to be based upon modern, 

paperless information technology (IT) and workflow systems focused on quality, accuracy, efficiency and accountability and must be capable of continuous improvement. VBA must evolve its corporate culture to focus on information gathering, systems analysis, identification of problems, creative solutions and rapid adjustments. 

If VBA stresses quality control and training, and continues to receive sufficient resources, timeliness will improve and production will increase and then and only 

then can the backlog be reduced and eventually eliminated. 

VA has presented over 40 initiatives as components of its transformation plan 

which signals a commendable effort on VA’s part to comprehensively confront issues 

that have long plagued its systems and processes. However, the success of this litany of initiatives depends heavily on whether the VA Regional Offices are properly 

staffed and resourced, training is adequate, and the cost-benefit analyses are thorough and honest. Given the enormous pressure to reduce the backlog, Paralyzed 

Veterans is also concerned that there could be a bias towards process improvements 

that result in greater production over those that lead to greater quality and accuracy. 

VA’s most anticipated initiative, the Veterans Benefits Management System 

(VBMS), pioneered the development of a paperless claims IT solution to improve future business processes. It was intended to enable more efficient claims process flow 

to reduce cycle time by eliminating paper claims and supporting process changes, 

but its success to date is qualified by the reality that the system is designed to handle simpler cases than those Paralyzed Veterans typically sees and few cases processed to date have involved catastrophic disabilities. Rules-based processes like 

VBMS treat all veterans the same and can be flawed by imperfect rulemaking and 

application and does not have the human interaction to fully understand the circumstances of a specific injury. 

VBA has struggled for decades to provide timely and accurate decisions on claims 

for veterans’ benefits, especially disability compensation. However, despite repeated 

prior attempts to reform the system, VBA has never been able to reach the goals 

it has set for itself. Whether VBA can be successful this time depends to a large 

extent on whether it can complete a cultural shift away from focusing on speed and 

production to a business culture of quality and accuracy. 

There have been some encouraging steps towards such a cultural shift over the 

past few years; however, this early progress must be institutionalized in order to 

create the long term stability needed to eliminate the current backlog of claims, and 

more importantly, prevent such a backlog from returning in the future. VBA must 

change the way it measures and reports the work it performs as well as the way 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

54 

in which employees are rewarded, in order to reflect the principle that quality and 

accuracy are at least as important as speed and production. It is our understanding 

that VBA is actually making changes to its methodology for evaluating claims decisions and performance at this time. Ensuring that decisions are correct the first 

time will, over time, increase public confidence in the VA and decrease appeals. 

One of the more positive steps that have occurred as a part of VBA’s transformation has been the open and candid attitude of VBA’s leadership over the past 

several years, particularly progress towards developing a new partnership between 

VBA and veterans’ service organizations that assist veterans in filing claims. Veterans’ service organizations have vast experience and expertise in claims processing, 

with local and national service officers holding power of attorney (POA) for hundreds of thousands of veterans and their families. We do however have concerns 

that VBA has once again shut the door on VSO input with regards to the ongoing 

revisions of the VA schedule for rating disabilities (VASRD). Our initial assessment 

of VA’s proposed changes to some of the body systems in the VASRD led us to believe that VA was moving in the wrong direction. However, once we began expressing our concerns to VA, access to the revision efforts became more difficult. As a 

key stakeholder, we believe it is absolutely imperative that VSO’s retain a leading 

role as the VA updates its processes and regulations. It will be incumbent upon the 

Committees to conduct substantive oversight on VBA’s activities to ensure that the 

primary objective—accurate decisions the first time—is being achieved. 

BENEFITS FOR SEVERELY DISABLED VETERANS—Paralyzed Veterans 

believes that it is time for the Committees to make a concerted effort to improve 

benefits for the most severely disabled veterans particularly with regards to the 

rates of Special Monthly Compensation paid to severely disabled veterans. We also 

believe the Committees should consider the larger benefit that providing travel reimbursement to catastrophically disabled non-service connected veterans will have 

on the long term care costs that can be saved from this population of veterans. 

As you know, there is a well-established shortfall in the rates of Special Monthly 

Compensation (SMC) paid to the most severely disabled veterans that the VA 

serves. SMC represents payments for ‘‘quality of life’’ issues, such as the loss of an 

eye or limb, the inability to naturally control bowel and bladder function, the inability to achieve sexual satisfaction or the need to rely on others for the activities of 

daily life like bathing, or eating. To be clear, given the extreme nature of the disabilities incurred by most veterans in receipt of SMC, we do not believe that a veteran can be totally compensated for the impact on quality of life; however, SMC 

does at least offset some of the loss of quality of life. 

Paralyzed Veterans believes that an increase in SMC benefits is essential for veterans with severe disabilities. Many severely injured veterans do not have the 

means to function independently and need intensive care on a daily basis. Many veterans spend more on daily home-based care than they are receiving in SMC benefits. With this in mind, Paralyzed Veterans would like to recommend that Aid and 

Attendance (A&A) benefits be appropriately increased. Attendant care is very expensive and often the A&A benefits provided to eligible veterans do not cover this cost. 

In fact, many Paralyzed Veterans members who pay for full-time attendant care 

incur costs that far exceed the amount they receive as SMC–A&A beneficiaries at 

the R2 compensation level (the highest rate available). We encourage the Committees to consider legislation that specifically address increases to the R1 and R2 rates 

for SMC and A&A benefits soon. 

Also, we believe the Committee should consider expanding travel reimbursement 

benefits to catastrophically disabled non-service connected veterans. While we recognize that the VA will face tighter budgets in the future, and that this benefit could 

add a significant cost to the VA, we believe the short term costs of expanding this 

benefit to this population of veterans would be far outweighed by the potentially 

greater long term health care costs for these veterans. Too often, catastrophically 

disabled veterans choose not to travel to VA medical centers for appointments and 

procedures due to significant costs associated with their travel. They then may end 

up at an outpatient clinic or a private health care facility that is ill-equipped to 

meet their specialized health care needs. The result is often the development of far 

worse health conditions and a higher cost of care. By ensuring that catastrophically 

disabled veterans are able to travel to the best location to receive necessary care, 

their overall health care costs to the VA can be reduced. 

LONG–TERM CARE—Paralyzed Veterans continues to be concerned about the 

lack of VA’s long-term care services for veterans with spinal cord injury or dysfunction (SCI/D). Approximately 7,300 of our members are now over 65 years of age and 

another 6,000 are currently between 55 and 64. These aging veterans are experiencing an increasing need for VA’s home and community-based services and VA’s 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

55 

specialized SCI/D nursing home care. Unfortunately, we believe that VA is not requesting and Congress is not providing sufficient resources to meet the demand. 

The ability to remain in the home for many of these veterans is based on their 

ability to receive VA home and community-based services such as hospital based 

home care or respite services. For others, their living status and independence is 

based on the health of a primary caregiver, usually a spouse, who is also aging and 

may no longer be able to provide the level of support they once could. VA’s noninstitutional long-term care services are keys to supporting aging SCI/D veterans 

and their caregivers and their desires to remain home as they grow older. 

Unfortunately, the ability of veterans with SCI/D to access a full range of VA 

home and community-based care varies across the country. Waiting lists exist at almost all VA facility locations and many other VA facilities don’t offer the full range 

of services mandated by the ‘‘Millennium Health Care Act.’’ Additionally, VA program geographic boundaries often limit access to long-term care services provided 

by a regional VA SCI center. 

The availability of these services is necessary to support veterans with SCI/D and 

their aging caregivers in their own homes, where they most want to be, and at a 

dramatically lower cost of care to VA. Paralyzed Veterans requests that your Committees encourage VA to provide the full range of home and community-based longterm care services, as mandated by P.L. 106–117, the ‘‘Veterans Millennium Health 

Care and Benefits Act of 1999,’’ at each and every VA facility within the system. 

Currently, VA operates only five designated long-term-care facilities for SCI/D 

veterans. Unfortunately, the existing centers are not geographically located to meet 

the needs of a nationally distributed SCI/D veteran population. Often, the existing 

centers do not have space available for new veterans needing long-term-care services, and facilities have long waiting lists for admission. VA has designated SCI/D 

long-term-care facilities because of the unique medical needs of SCI/D veterans, and 

the specialty skills and qualifications that are necessary to care for and meet the 

medical needs of veterans with SCI/D. Therefore, when veterans do not have access 

to SCI/D long-term-care centers, the quality of care provided is compromised and 

veterans are forced to seek alternative care settings such as non-SCI/D nursing 

homes. 

While VA has identified the need to provide additional SCI/D long-term-care centers, and has included these additional centers in ongoing facility renovations, such 

plans have been pending for years. To ensure that SCI/D veterans in need of longterm-care services have timely access to VA centers that can provide quality care, 

both VA and Congress must work together to ensure that the Spinal Cord Injury 

System of Care has adequate resources to staff existing long-term-care centers, as 

well as increase the number of centers throughout VA. Paralyzed Veterans, in accordance with the recommendations of The Independent Budget for FY 2014, recommends that VA SCI/D leadership design a SCI/D long-term-care strategic plan 

that addresses the need for increased access, and makes certain that VA SCI/D 

long-term-care services allow SCI/D veterans to attain or maintain a community 

level of adjustment, and maximal independence despite their loss of functional ability’’ 

REPRODUCTIVE SERVICES FOR CATASTROPHICALLY DISABLED 

VETERANS—A continuing high priority for Paralyzed Veterans is the provision of 

reproductive services for catastrophically disabled service-connected veterans. One 

of the most devastating results of spinal cord injury or dysfunction for many individuals is the loss of the ability to have children and raise a family. Paralyzed Veterans 

has long sought inclusion of reproductive services in the spectrum of health care 

benefits provided by the VA. We believe they are critical components of catastrophically disabled veterans’ maximization of independence and quality of life. 

Advancements in medical treatments have for some time made it possible to overcome infertility and reproductive disabilities. For some paralyzed veterans procreative services have been secured in the private sector at great cost to the veteran 

and family. Similar to the Department of Defense’s recognition that reproductive 

services are crucial elements in affording catastrophically disabled individuals and 

their spouses with life-affirming ability to have children and raise a family, so too 

will passage of legislation that will authorize the VA to offer similar services to veterans disabled in service to the nation. 

With this in mind, we strongly urge the Senate VA Committee to consider and 

approve S. 131, the ‘‘Women Veterans and Other Health Care Improvements Act.’’ 

This legislation would afford catastrophically disabled veterans and their spouses 

the opportunity to finally realize the dream of having children. We would also like 

to point out that Representative Rick Larsen (D–WA) is preparing to introduce companion legislation to S. 131. We hope that all members of the House VA Committee 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

56 

will consider cosponsoring this legislation. Additionally, we urge the House VA Committee to take up and approve this legislation as soon as it is introduced. 

INCREASE IN CHAMPVA BENEFICIARY AGE—The Civilian Health and 

Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs (CHAMPVA) is a comprehensive health care program in which the VA shares the cost of covered health 

care services for eligible beneficiaries, including children up to age 23. Due to the 

similarity between CHAMPVA and the Department of Defense (DOD) TRICARE 

program the two are often mistaken for each other. However, CHAMPVA is a VA 

managed program whereas TRICARE is a health care program for active duty service members, military retirees and their families and survivors. 

In accordance with the provisions of P.L. 111–148, the ‘‘Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA),’’ all commercial health insurance coverage along with 

TRICARE has increased the age for covered dependents from 23 years old to 26 

years old. At this time the only qualified dependents that are not covered under a 

parent’s health insurance policy up to age 26 are those of 100 percent service-connected disabled veterans covered under CHAMPVA. It is time for Congress to correct this oversight. We urge the House VA Committee to consider and approve H.R. 

288 and the Senate VA Committee to consider and approve S. 325 in order to fix 

this injustice once and for all. 

VETERANS EMPLOYMENT AND TRANSFER OF VETS TO VA—The unemployment rate for veterans with catastrophic disabilities currently lingers around 85 

percent. Unfortunately, this statistic was true even when the economy was booming. 

Some of this is due to low self-expectations on the veteran’s part. But employers 

have played a role in this as well, by submitting to stigmas and misperceptions 

about the cost of hiring disabled veterans. Paralyzed Veterans led the way by 

launching our Paving Access for Veterans Employment (PAVE) Program in 2007 in 

order to erase stigmas and change expectations for veterans who suffered a lifechanging circumstance and need help regaining independence and economic self sufficiency. 

Our PAVE Program provides core services to more than 1500 veterans, extended 

services (benefits, health, and/or career assistance) to over 30,000, and our Master’slevel certified counselors have helped more than 250 hard-to-place clients achieve 

their vocational goals. PAVE counselors and service officers serve any veteran, 

spouse, or dependent, at no cost to them. Our services extend to all 50 states and 

Puerto Rico through six regional offices collocated with VA Spinal Cord Injury Centers and our network of 69 service offices around the country. The secret of our success is the ‘‘supported employment’’ model we use. This model allows us to engage 

veterans at the bedside while they recover, integrate resources, and customize services to individual needs. We then remain Partners For Life with our veterans to ensure they never have to go it alone. 

Similarly, we appreciate the emphasis that the Committees have placed on veterans’ employment in the last few years. And yet, we believe more can be done. We 

strongly recommend the Committees adopt a resolution calling for a five-year extension of the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC), including the VOW Act credits 

for veterans incorporated in WOTC. WOTC is particularly important to disabled veterans because two out of three veterans find jobs in the private sector. Unfortunately, most small and medium size enterprises aren’t participating in WOTC because the program will expire at the end of this year. If WOTC were made permanent or at the very least extended for a minimum of five years, we believe significant opportunities would be opened to veterans and disabled veterans seeking employment. 

Additionally, we would like to recommend a transfer of all programs administered 

by the Department of Labor’s Veterans Employment and Training Service (VETS) 

to the VA. This recommendation is also included in The Independent Budget for FY 

2014. For nearly two decades, VETS has been charged with providing employment 

services to veterans and disabled veterans to reengage them in the workforce. Unfortunately, multiple reports from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and 

other government commissions have shown that VETS has been unable to provide 

adequate oversight of the State Grant program and has failed to implement adequate performance metrics to determine the quality of services provided to veterans 

seeking employment. Moreover, too often Disabled Veterans Outreach Program 

(DVOP) specialists and Local Veterans Employment Representatives (LVER) have 

been forced to perform other functions with state workforce agencies leaving veterans without adequate service. 

For this reason, Paralyzed Veterans continues to advocate for legislation that 

would consolidate the programs administered by VETS under the authority of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Consolidating these programs under the umbrella of the VA will ensure better management, oversight, and ultimately producVACREP180 with DISTILLER

57 

tivity from VETS staff. Additionally, it will ensure that these critical services for 

veterans are given the highest priority, a principle that is severely lacking under 

the administration of DOL. 

‘‘ONE VA’’—In the end, many of the concerns that I have raised reflect the belief 

that this is not ‘‘One VA.’’ While our ears hear ‘‘One VA,’’ our eyes and our experiences show us 21 individual VA systems masquerading as Veteran Integrated Service Networks (VISNs). The VISN model of health care was intended to create strategic alliances among VA medical centers, clinics and other sites; sharing agreements with other government providers; and other such relationships. Instead, we 

see these VISNs being run like autonomous entities in a fragmented network, with 

inconsistent policies and budgetary turf battles that leave many veterans faced with 

delayed or denied access to care or prosthetics items. 

In fact, Paralyzed Veterans service officers had to get involved when one of our 

members—a 94-year old paralyzed Marine who fought in WWII—endured a longer 

in-patient stay because two VISNs could not decide which VISN would pay for his 

hoyer lift and commode chair he needs to live independently. In the ‘‘One VA’’ world, 

it is not his burden. But in this real instance, he was the one caught in the middle 

of two independently operating VISNs, thus defying any notion of there being ‘‘One 

VA.’’ 

On balance, VA is fortunate to have good people who still adhere to the principle 

that veterans come before cost considerations and policies. Even in times of national 

economic difficulty and profound organizational transformation, our Nation’s security is still preserved by the men and women who take the oath and believe in the 

Country’s promise to care for him or her should they suffer injury or disease. But 

until we have 21 VISNs that operate with a common purpose, under common policies, variability between VISNs will create even more gaps in which the most vulnerable veterans will fall. We hear ‘‘One VA.’’ Now show us ‘‘One VA.’’ 

Paralyzed Veterans of America appreciates the opportunity to present our legislative priorities and concerns for the second session of the 112th Congress. We look 

forward to working with the Committees to ensure that sufficient, timely, and predictable resources are provided to the VA health care system so that eligible veterans can receive the care that they have earned and deserve. Chairmen Miller and 

Sanders, I would like to thank you again for the opportunity to testify. I would be 

happy to answer any questions you have. 

f 

Prepared Statement of Sheldon Ohren 

INTRODUCTION 

Chairman Sanders, Chairman Miller, and Members of the Senate and House 

Committees on Veterans’ Affairs, my fellow veterans and friends, I am Sheldon 

Ohren, the National Commander of the Jewish War Veterans of the U.S.A. (JWV). 

JWV is Congressionally Chartered and also provides counseling and assistance to 

members encountering problems dealing with the Department of Defense (DoD), the 

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and other government agencies. JWV is an active participant in The Military Coalition, a select group of over 30 military associations and veterans’ organizations representing over five million active duty, reserve 

and retired uniformed service personnel, veterans, families, and survivors on Capitol 

Hill. In fact, I am very proud that our National Executive Director, Colonel Herb 

Rosenbleeth, who is here with me today, is the President of the Military Coalition. 

On February 12, 13 and 14, our National Executive Committee members were 

here in Washington to meet with their Senators and Representatives as part of 

JWV’s Capitol Hill Action Day(s). Our members prepared diligently for these important meetings and successfully presented many of JWV’s legislative priorities to 

your colleagues, their members of Congress and congressional staff. 

Chairman Sanders, it was a singular honor for JWV to present our prestigious 

JWV Medal of Merit to you at our Congressional Reception during our days on Capitol Hill. It was equally rewarding to JWV to have so many distinguished guests 

participate with us! 

Mr. Chairman, on Friday, March 15th, we at JWV will celebrate our 117th birthday. For all of these 117 years, JWV has advocated a strong national defense, and 

just and fair recognition and compensation for veterans. The Jewish War Veterans 

of the USA prides itself in being in the forefront among our nation’s civic and veterans groups in supporting the well-earned rights of veterans, in promoting American democratic principles, in defending universal Jewish causes and in vigorously 

opposing bigotry, anti-Semitism and terrorism both here and abroad. Today, even 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

58 

more than ever before, we stand for these principles. The Jewish War Veterans of 

the U.S.A. represents a proud tradition of patriotism and service to the United 

States of America. 

As the National Commander of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA (JWV), I 

thank you for the opportunity to present the views of our 100,000 members and supporters on issues under the jurisdiction of your committees. At the conclusion of 

JWV’s 117th National Convention in Norfolk, Virginia, our convention delegates 

adopted our resolutions for the 113th Congress. These mandates establish the legislative agenda for JWV during my year as National Commander. 

JWV believes Congress has a unique obligation and compelling opportunity to ensure that veterans’ benefits are regularly reviewed and improved to keep pace with 

the needs of all veterans in a changing social and economic environment. JWV salutes the Chairs and Members of both the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees for the landmark veterans’ legislation enacted over the past several years. 

Eligibility improvement, patient enrollment, long-term care, access to emergency 

care, presumptive Agent Orange disability, enhanced VA/DoD sharing, improved 

preference rights of veterans in the federal government and other records recognize 

the debt this great country owes to those who have so faithfully served. 

We must improve access to veterans’ health care, increase timeliness in the benefit claims process, and enhance access to national cemeteries and to state cemeteries for all veterans. 

NO GOVERNMENT FUNDING 

For the record, the Jewish War Veterans of the USA, Inc. does not receive any 

grants or contracts from the federal government. This is as it should be. 

THE MILITARY COALITION 

JWV continues to be a proud member and active participant of the Military Coalition (TMC). PNC Robert M. Zweiman, JWV’s National Chairman, serves on the 

Board of Directors of the Military Coalition and, again, our National Executive Director, Colonel Herb Rosenbleeth, USA (Ret), continues to serve as the President of 

the Military Coalition and as Co-Chair of the Coalition’s Membership and Nominations Committee. 

JWV requests that the Senate and House Committees on Veterans’ Affairs do everything possible to fulfill the legislative priorities of the Military Coalition which 

are applicable to your committees. These positions are well thought out and are 

clearly in the best interests of our military personnel, our veterans and our great 

nation. 

THE THROWAWAYS 

Throwaways are sometimes called disposables or expendables. They include razors, toothbrushes, underwear, clothing, and other products; and now, we can add 

military personnel, their family, and their dependents. 

If you follow political campaigns, advertisements, and TV, you will understand 

and determine that the most important thing in American life is the balanced budget and then possibly the family, but what the family politicians talk about is solely 

their own family – forget about yours. 

The budget cutters have specifically programmed your (not their) obligation which 

demands from you the right for you to sacrifice yourself for the well being of military personnel. The obligation for budgetary cash savings has been imposed on you 

– the usual political ‘‘not me’’ syndrome. 

The budget cutters have created and imposed on you a fear of national financial 

failure by which they have been able to control your way of life. Thus, they have 

forced you to accept the responsibility for the nation’s financial failures rather than 

to place the responsibility where it belongs, on the creators of the continuing national financial failure. 

The pettiness of the methodology is demonstrated when the proposed pay increase 

of 1.8 percent for military personnel is reduced to 1 percent while the politicians, 

at the same time, push for the purchase of more tanks while thousands of tanks 

already exist and lay fallow in fields available for use. Does paying off political donors or self gratification constitute a moral basis for denying a modest pay increase 

for the personnel we rely on to protect our nation? 

For many years, we have raised questions as to the inadequacy (read miserable) 

of housing for the military and their families. There has always been a national responsibility for creating the atmosphere for a healthy and normal lifestyle. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

59 

This budgetary failure has existed for many years without a national leadership 

(read both Executive and Congressional) acceptance of their moral obligation. The 

quality of life for military families has become budget-wise, a meaningless quality, 

essential for a loving and happy home. 

Now here comes the new budgetary cost reduction approaches to further disrespect the military and their dependents. Just imagine that for your family breakfast you need to buy some juice, cereal, and milk. First you must get onto a bus, 

taxi, or your car to go to a nearby town to buy the food. Then you would pay more 

for the food than you might have to pay on the base plus add the transportation 

costs and the inconvenience of lost time and waste of effort. 

Well, that is the budgetary red tape being forced upon us by the removal and the 

elimination of PX’s, commissaries, and exchanges from our bases. You must recognize that not only do these units provide food, but they also provide clothing, medications, and all the needs and requirements of the shopper to be able to make purchases at reasonable prices. This applies not only to the military and their families 

but also to retired veterans. 

Many of the families also depend on the discounted product coupons found in 

newspapers which people like my wife, Jeri, send overseas to various APOs where 

the coupon expiration dates are then extended for six months while those coupons 

are not time extended at the local stores. 

Irrationality is the best indication of the proposal to eliminate and close base 

schools and require military children to be transported to local town schools. We 

constantly talk about the need for educational advancement and the requirement for 

global leadership based on educational skills. Here, we intentionally devalue that 

goal. 

So now we will have to bus the children to local schools where the local students 

will consider the military students to be ‘‘outsiders’’ and where our children may be 

unable to participate in after-school activities, sports, and school clubs. They will 

probably not expect to graduate with their class unless their parent remains on that 

base. The psychological affect on these children cannot be quantified. The effect on 

their future lives cannot be projected or protected. And, don’t expect the locals to 

do this out of the goodness of their heart by raising their own local property taxes 

to pay for it. 

The budget cutters are morally indefensible and corrupt. Their actions can result 

in some of the families returning home, financially unable to live together on base. 

The budget cutters, by their actions and without respecting human decency, have 

taken a path intended to disrupt and disable the family unit and weaken our military personnel. 

The budget cutters are responsible for the current and the future of those of our 

military personnel (and don’t forget the family members) who may end up with 

PTSD, homeless, family dysfunction, and other ailments. It would have a clear impact on our society as we have learned from today’s life. 

You may consider that I am being overly frustrated and overly downcast, but I 

do realize that common sense tells me that to nickel and dime those who sacrifice 

themselves on the front lines and define our national security is a national disgrace. 

To treat our troops as though they are robots entitled only to a little oiling is not 

merely a dishonor but a serious disease in the soul of America and its citizens. 

We all deserve better than having our military personnel and their families being 

considered a throwaway – especially in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. 

MANDATORY FUNDING 

JWV continues to maintain that the Congress has an unbreakable obligation to 

its veterans. Adequate VA funding must be guaranteed by the Congress. 

This country has a sacred obligation to those who have served and defended our 

nation to fully provide for their needs when they return from battle. Mandatory 

funding is necessary so that all category eights receive the care they need, so that 

veterans receive long term care, and so that VA medical research will be second to 

none! This is especially important now that we know more about the real challenges 

and expenses resulting from injuries to the brain, eyes, amputations, and other catastrophic injuries. 

Only when the VA not only knows in advance the level of its funding but also 

knows with certainty that its funding levels will be adequate for all of its requirements can our veterans be assured that all of their health care needs can and will 

be met. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

60 

SEQUESTRATION 

Last year’s failure of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction means that 

automatic spending cuts, known as sequestration, are scheduled to take effect in 

early 2013 unless Congress finds other options to reverse the deficit. Cuts in military spending are projected not only to compromise our national security but also 

increase unemployment by as much as an entire percentage point nationwide. The 

JWV is deeply concerned about military spending reductions during a time of war. 

JWV is equally wary about the budget and its potential effect on the Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

Hundreds of thousands of men and women who served in Iraq and Afghanistan 

now rely on VA for health care. They enter our nation’s VA medical centers, clinics 

and nursing homes at a time when veterans of previous wars are reaching advanced 

ages and in need of VA’s services. These are services they earned, deserve and were 

promised. No veteran should have to wait weeks for appointments nor travel hundreds of miles to see providers. Female veterans should have health-care services 

that meet their needs. Cities such as Orlando, Denver and New Orleans should not 

have to wait years for the construction of long-overdue hospitals. 

The pressure on VA will only mount as defense budget cuts drive down force sizes 

and more of our military personnel re-enter civilian life. DoD and VA must work 

in harmony to ease the transition and help the influx of new veterans get the help 

they need, including timely benefits, access to high-quality health care and careers 

that match their skills. 

Many key veterans programs require coordination with government departments 

such as Labor, and Housing and Urban Development, which enjoy no protection of 

any kind from sequestration. Veterans programs within those departments must be 

protected if they are to succeed. 

JWV wants Congress to ensure that national security and veterans programs in 

VA and other departments are not sacrificed in the budget battle. Previous legislation, such as the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 and 

the Statutory Pay as you Go Act of 2010, included language specifically protecting 

VA programs from cuts. As the budget deficit widens, similar and specific protections are necessary today. 

VETERANS AND BRAIN DISEASE 

There are over 220,000 service members diagnosed with mild and severe brain injuries since 2001. Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is often called the signature wound 

of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Common causes of TBI include damage caused 

by explosive devices, falls, and vehicle or motorcycle accidents. Most reported TBI 

among Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom service members 

and veterans has been traced back to Improvised Explosive Devices, or IEDs, used 

extensively against Coalition Forces. 

Severe TBI usually results from a significant closed head injury, as in an automobile accident or most open or penetrating injuries, where there may be considerable residual deficits of brain function. Depending on the injury, a severe TBI could 

impact speech, sensory, vision and cause cognitive deficits including difficulties with 

attention, memory, concentration, and impulsiveness. There is an aggressive initial 

treatment program in the theater with neurosurgical expertise. 

Rehabilitation services are needed by individuals with TBI who continue to have 

medical and functional problems following injury and initial treatment. Rehabilitation is begun as soon as individuals with TBI are medically stable. The degree and 

rate of recovery are difficult to accurately predict because TBI is experienced differently by each person depending upon several unique characteristics, such as the 

type of injury and an individual’s personal health and resilience. Where rehabilitation takes place depends on the person’s needs. Individuals with severe TBI’s may 

need inpatient care at a Military Treatment Facility (MTF), a VA Polytrauma hospital, or a civilian rehabilitation center. Individuals with a mild TBI (mTBI)/concussion may be treated at outpatient facilities. 

A report released by an Institute of Medicine Committee concluded there is ‘‘limited evidence’’ that some types of cognitive therapy – exercises and strategies taught 

to patients to recover brain function – work in the long term, especially therapies 

addressing deficits in memory, attention and communications. 

JWV strongly urges the Congress to provide the VA with sufficient resources to 

properly care for, and rehabilitate veterans with TBI wounds or injuries. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

61 

SUICIDES 

The Jewish War Veterans of the USA has long advocated the embedding of mental health professionals in all active military units, including the Reserve and National Guard components. The media is reporting an average of one suicide victim 

per day among the men and women on active duty. The presence of such mental 

health professionals may prevent some of the suicides and homicides we are now 

witnessing among those now serving in the military. 

The ‘‘military culture’’ demands service members to maintain an aura of toughness and stoic acceptance of the horrors of war. The ‘‘code of silence’’ either encourages or requires members of the military not to report comrades-in-arms to ‘‘higher 

authorities’’ even when that comrade exhibits characteristics of one who might become a victim of suicide or might strike out angrily and harm those closest to the 

service member. 

The Jewish War Veterans of the USA repeats its enunciated position, that there 

needs to be a truly innovative approach to anger management within the military 

and a recognition that there is a problem that absolutely must be approached creatively and that there need to be fewer studies and more action. 

Therefore, the Jewish War Veterans of the USA demands the Department of Defense immediately retain the services of as many mental health professionals as required to embed one in each and every military unit, including the active component, Reserve and National Guard. 

Furthermore, the Jewish War Veterans of the USA demands funding be provided 

for the Department of Defense to immediately seek to train the Non-Commissioned 

Officer Corps and the Company Commanders on how to recognize depression, anger, 

and the other signs of possible violence either directed inward (suicide) or outward 

(spousal abuse, etc.) 

VA CLAIMS BACKLOG 

The Veterans Affairs Department’s disability claims backlog recently edged above 

the 900,000 mark with 608,365 – 67.6 percent – stuck in the system more than 125 

days. 

VA reported that total disability claims hit 900,121 as of December 24, 2012, up 

24,725 – 2.7 percent –from the backlog that existed at the start of the calendar year 

on January 3, 2012. 

Over the past two years, VA has gone backward. According to VA’s own figures, 

over 65 percent of veterans with disability benefits claims have been waiting longer 

than 125 days for them to be processed. 

While some regional offices may have an average rate of 76 days per claim, others 

take 336 days—a troubling inconsistency. Although the VA has a shortage of trained 

claims personnel, and there is a long lead time to train claims personnel, this average rate of processing must be reduced. Unfortunately, accuracy is also a problem. 

VA has been reluctant to publicly post accuracy figures in its Monday Morning 

Workload reports, but VA’s own STAR reports for accuracy place the rate in the mid 

80’s. 

VA is hopeful that the Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS) will eliminate many of the woes that have led to the backlog, but electronic solutions are not 

a magic bullet. Without real reform for a culture of work that places higher priority 

on raw speed than accuracy, VA will continue to struggle, no matter the tools used 

to process claims. 

While VA’s stated goals of ‘‘no claim pending longer than 125 days’’ and 98-percent accuracy are admirable, many veterans would settle for their claims being initially processed correctly in a timely manner veterans with multiple conditions need 

to be seen by a primary care physician and should not be handled separately with 

each condition reviewed one at a time. One veteran-one visit. 

If VA employees receive the same credit for work, whether it is done properly or 

improperly, there is little incentive to take the time to process a claim correctly. 

When a claim is processed in error, a veteran must appeal the decision to receive 

benefits, and then wait for an appeals process that may take months to resolve and 

possibly years for delivery of the benefit. 

JWV believes VA must develop a processing model that puts as much emphasis 

on accuracy as it does on the raw number of claims completed. Nowhere does VA 

publicly post its accuracy figures. America’s veterans need to have more confidence 

in the work done by VA. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

62 

BLINDED VETERANS 

Blinded veterans are of extra special concern to JWV. The large number of IED 

explosions in Iraq and Afghanistan have led to a huge number of eye injuries and 

blinded veterans. In fact, orbital blast globe injuries, optic nerve injuries, and retinal injuries have been all too common. JWV strongly urges the congress to insure 

adequate funding to care for our thousands of veterans with eye injuries. 

HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS 

JWV applauds VA for processing nearly 230,000 claims through June 2012 that 

involved the three newest Agent Orange-related conditions. The recent expansion of 

conditions presumed to be linked to Agent Orange exposure certainly created additional work for VA, which already faces a heavy claims backlog, but VA Secretary 

Eric Shinseki argued correctly that it was the right thing to do. Decisions about 

treating and compensating veterans exposed to deadly toxins must never be motivated by whether or not the road will be challenging or costly, but whether or not 

the veteran has suffered and requires treatment because of the exposure. 

JWV strongly supports the establishment of a unified policy to deal with the consequences of exposure to hazardous materials in the military. 

JWV urges continued study of all environmental hazards and their effects on 

servicemembers and veterans. New challenges, such as burn pits, must be addressed. Evidence suggests more than 227 metric tons of waste have been burned 

in conjunction with JP–8 jet fuel, releasing countless carcinogens into the air that 

servicemembers have breathed. At the very least, a full accounting of exposed veterans through a burn-pit registry or similar means would be an important step forward. 

Agent Orange remains a concern, as thousands of veterans exposed to the toxin 

are left behind when it comes to vital treatment and benefits. JWV remains committed to ensuring all veterans who served in areas of exposure receive recognition 

and treatment for conditions linked to Agent Orange. Time is running out for those 

veterans not designated as having ‘‘boots on the ground’’ during the Vietnam War. 

Studies indicate ‘‘Blue Water Navy’’ veterans may have experienced higher exposure 

rates to Agent Orange than those who were on the ground, due to water desalination systems on the ships; this never has been satisfactorily addressed by VA. The 

time is now to recognize all Vietnam veterans for their exposure to Agent Orange, 

not just those who had boots on the ground. 

JWV urges VA to work with DoD to finally complete the list of exposure locations 

outside Vietnam, including the C–123 K transport aircraft, Thailand and other supporting areas of the Vietnam theater, as well as Korea. 

JWV urges continued close scrutiny by the Institute of Medicine into Agent Orange, Gulf War illness and other concerns. When problems are identified, VA must 

act swiftly to ensure current compensation and treatment is based on the most recent scientific findings. 

VETERAN HOMELESSNESS 

VA has promised to devote resources necessary to end veteran homelessness by 

2015. To fully implement that pledge, VA is going to have to work closely with Congress to continue making responsible investments in affordable housing and supportive service programs to help more veterans and their families. Current estimates put the number of homeless veterans at approximately 76,000 on any given 

night, down from 2010 numbers of 131,000 or more. 

JWV recommends providing funding for a broad range of appropriate and effective 

interventions, including: 

• Appropriation of funds for the Supportive Services for Veteran Families program. SSVF funds have been used effectively by community organizations to 

prevent many veterans from becoming homeless and to quickly assist veterans 

who need nothing more than short-term rental assistance and limited case management to get back on their feet. SSVF funds also can be used to pay for employment services, utility assistance, child care costs and other housing-related 

expenses. 

• Congressional support for the homeless veterans Grant and Per Diem transitional housing program. This program provides short-term housing help to 

homeless veterans, allowing them to get connected with jobs, supportive services and more permanent housing, ultimately allowing them to become self-sufficient. Promising new models for using Grant and Per Diem funds – including 

allowing veterans to remain in their GPD housing units once support from the 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

63 

program ends – and new programs focused on women veterans are helping to 

ensure that GPD continues to meet the ever-changing needs of returning veterans and their families. 

• Congress should provide 10,000 new HUD–VASH vouchers designed to serve 

homeless veterans (and in many cases their families) who need long-term housing, intensive case management and supportive services. Since 2008, 37,975 

vouchers have been awarded, contributing substantially to major reductions in 

veteran homelessness. 

CORRECT THE SURVIVOR BENEFIT PROGRAM (SBP) 

Survivors of military retirees who die of service-connected causes and who paid 

into SBP, and survivors killed in active-duty, should receive both SBP and DIC (Dependency and Indemnity Compensation) benefits without the current dollar for dollar offset. JWV strongly supports legislation to end this offset. 

JWV strongly supports HR 178, The Military Surviving Spouses Equity Act, 

which would correct this inequity. 

MIA/POW 

JWV has always been an ardent, active supporter of the National League of Families of American Prisoners and Missing in Southeast Asia. JWV will always remember those who are still unaccounted for and their families. We fly the MIA–POW 

flag in the lobby of our headquarters and place that flag in front of our meeting 

rooms. 

There are still 1,655 personnel listed by the Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO) as missing and unaccounted-for from the Vietnam War. The number 

of Americans announced by DPMO as returned and identified since the end of the 

Vietnam War in 1975 is 928. Another 63 US personnel, recovered by the US and 

ID’d before the end of the war, bring the official total of remains repatriated from 

the Vietnam War is 991. Of the 1,655 missing and unaccounted-for personnel, 90% 

were lost in Vietnam or areas of Laos and Cambodia under Vietnam’s wartime control: Vietman-1,280 (VN–470); Laos-314; Cambodia-54; PRC territorial waters-7. 

More than 450 over-water losses are among the 630 DPMO lists as No Further Pursuit (NFP) cases. 

RESTORING THE US–RUSSIAN JOINT COMMISSION ON POW/MIA 

AFFAIRS 

In 1992, the US–Russia Joint Commission on POW/MIA Affairs (USRJC) was established by Presidents George H.W. Bush and Boris Yeltsin to determine the fate 

of personnel of the United States and the former Soviet Union still missing and unaccounted for from the Vietnam War, the Cold War, Korean War and World War 

II, as well as the former USSR’s war in Afghanistan. 

The USRJC and its mission have been supported by every President of the United 

States since its formation. In 2006, President George W. Bush appointed General 

Robert ‘‘Doc’’ Foglesong, USAF Retired, as the American Co-chair and, in June, 

2011, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev appointed Ms. Yekaterina Priyezzheva 

as the Russian Co-chair and more than 30 Commissioners to the Russian delegation 

of the Commission. 

Over the past several years the Department of Defense has broken promises of 

support for the USRJC, redirecting funding and personnel to other tasks causing irreparable damage to the USRJC and its ability to accomplish its mission. The Jewish War Veterans of the USA and other veteran’s organizations and POW/MIA family member organizations repeatedly have asked the President and the Congress to 

reinforce their support for the Commission and have received little response. 

Therefore, be it resolved that the Jewish War Veterans of the USA calls upon the 

President to reaffirm his commitment to the USRJC as a Presidential Commission, 

to General Robert ‘‘Doc’’ Foglesong as the American Co-chair, and their mission 

through publicly citing his policy priority and backing. 

It is further resolved that the Congress provide and direct the Secretary of Defense to restore to the USRJC the funding and personnel diverted to other POW/ 

MIA related tasks, thus ensuring the USRJC and its mission can be restored to its 

full potential. It is further resolved that the USRJC remain an independent Presidential Commission, with the Department of Defense providing the funding and personnel determined necessary by the Commission. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

64 

ANNUAL PTSD SCREENING FOR TROOPS 

The National Institute of Medicine has recommended that all members of the 

military returning from a tour of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan; and should be 

screened for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. 

Of the 2.6 million service members deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, some 13 to 

20 percent exhibit symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Per the National 

Institute of Medicine, barely one-half of those diagnosed with PTSD actually received treatment. 

Many members of the military do not seek treatment for fear it would injure their 

career within the military were they to seek treatment. By placing any results of 

interviews and screening in the member’s health file but without any reference to 

the screening in their personnel file more members would be willing to speak frankly during the interviews and screening. 

To be truly effective any interviews and screening process needs to be performed 

on an annual basis. Frequently, those who do seek treatment are not tracked to determine the success or failure to the treatment provided. There are alternative 

methods of treatment which have proven successful in non-DoD/DVA settings. 

Therefore, the Jewish War Veterans of the USA calls upon the Departments of 

Defense and Veterans Affairs to immediately implement programs which permit alternative medical therapies such as yoga, bio-feedback, acupuncture and animal-assisted treatment plans as well as the more traditional modalities in order to address 

the needs of the men and women suffering from post traumatic stress disorder. 

Therefore, the Jewish War Veterans of the USA calls upon the Departments of 

Defense and Veterans Affairs to research the rates of success and failure of the various modalities so that a full and complete conclusion can be made as to the viability of the individual modality. 

BENEFITS FOR GLOBAL WAR AGAINST TERRORISM VETERANS 

It appears that the men and women who have served during the Global War 

Against Terrorism may have been exposed to a variety of toxic substances. A considerable percent of men and women serving in the Global War Against Terrorism are 

victims of military sexual trauma. 

Military Sexual Trauma is defined by the Department of Veterans Affairs as, 

‘‘Sexual harassment that is threatening in character or physical assault of a sexual 

nature that occurred while the victim was in the military, regardless of geographical 

location of the trauma, gender of the victim, or the relationship to the perpetrator.’’ 

The Department of Veterans Affairs has developed certain procedures to treat 

these illnesses and injuries, nevertheless, there needs to be more done immediately 

to address the growing requests for these services. The only Federal beneficiaries 

not covered under the Hyde Amendment are women in the Armed Forces. There is 

greater awareness among the men and women currently serving and recently separated that there is a nexus between their current mental health and physical complaints and the service to their country. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs has let it be known that it is seeking to hire 

2,500 mental health professional of differing academic credentialing to confront this 

epidemic. The Department of Veterans Affairs must aggressively recruit and train 

counselors and evaluators to meet the physical and psychological needs of this new 

class of veterans. 

Therefore, the Jewish War Veterans of the USA calls upon the Department of Veterans Affairs to immediately take any and all steps necessary to handle the needs 

of the veterans of the Global War Against Terrorism, regardless of the nature of the 

illness or injury and regardless of the costs to do so; and calls on Congress to pass 

necessary legislation to have the Hyde Amendment include our servicewomen victims of rape or incest. 

Furthermore, the Jewish War Veterans of the USA calls upon the Congress to 

make immediately available to the Department of Veterans Affairs such funding as 

may be required by the Department to meet the needs of these veterans. 

BUDGET CONTROL ACT 

The Budget Control Act takes effect on January 2, 2013. The Budget Control Act 

mandates a decrease of some $600 billion over ten years in the country’s funding 

for national security. It appears quite likely that this sequestration of funds will result in an active Army of less than 400,000 personnel. 

The downsizing of the active component would have a devastating result in the 

ability to meet the needs of the United States’ foreign policies and would place an 

abhorrent burden on the Reserve and National Guard components of the Army 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

65 

thereby causing many members of the Guard and Reserve to leave those components. 

This entire scenario can be avoided by an immediate action of the Congress to 

come to the realization that the Budget Reduction Act must be amended to face the 

dangerous direction it is leading the Nation. The totality of the proposed reduction 

in the strength of the armed forces most likely will be: Army-30%, Navy-331/3%, Air 

Force-30%, Marines-20%, Coast Guard-5%. 

Therefore, the Congress must act responsively and step beyond partisan politics 

to prevent the demise of the active Army which would become an Army designed 

solely to prevent a foreign power from actually invading American soil but which 

would not be of sufficient strength to be deployed overseas. 

Furthermore, the Congress must act so that the research and development of new 

technologies would continue and new projects and programs could be developed. 

CAPITAL ONE’S VIOLATION OF SCRA 

Capital One Bank violated the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act by wrongfully 

foreclosing servicemembers’ homes and repossessing their cars. These actions by 

Capital One were clear violations of the special Protections afforded servicemembers 

by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. 

In addition to the violations mentioned above, Capital One, also, improperly denied some servicemembers interest rate relief on some credit cards and car loans. 

Capital One has agreed to pay at least $125,000 to each servicemember whose home 

was illegally foreclosed upon and at least $10,000 to each servicemember whose 

motor vehicle was illegally repossessed. Capital One will provide $5 million to 

servicemembers denied appropriate benefits on credit card accounts, automobile, 

consumer loans. The total value of the settlement reached between the Department 

of Justice and Capital One is approximately $12 million. 

Therefore, the Jewish War Veterans of the USA congratulates the Department of 

Justice for pursuing the claims of the men and women in the military who were 

wronged by Capital One and by recovering some of the money due them from Capital One. 

Furthermore, the Jewish War Veterans of the USA requests of the Justice Department that the next institution that can be proven to have violated the 

servicemembers Civil Relief Act not only be required to repay the injured 

servicemembers but, also, be required to pay punitive damages, as well. 

Furthermore, any such offending institution shall be required such reasonable 

steps as available to repair the credit rating of their wrongful actions. 

EXPANDING VETERANS’ COURTS 

Several jurisdictions have created ‘‘veterans’ courts’’ wherein veterans accused of 

non-violent crimes are either diverted into alternative programs or are tried. The 

veterans selected to participate in these programs must meet several strict criteria 

in order to qualify for the ‘‘veterans’ court’’. Those veterans who meet the criteria 

for eligibility are placed in an alternative program wherein they are required to be 

drug-free with random drug testing and undergo intense psychological counseling 

including but not limited to anger management. If they successfully complete the 

program their record is either sealed, expunged, or both. 

The recidivism rate among veterans who successfully complete the ‘‘veterans’ 

court’’ program is particularly encouraging in the areas of drug abuse and anger 

management thereby allowing the veteran to have a better chance of finding and 

holding a job as well as establishing and maintaining a family life. 

Therefore, the Jewish War Veterans of the USA encourages additional jurisdictions to establish ‘‘veterans’ courts’’ and to closely monitor these programs and to 

publish the results of the programs for other jurisdictions to study and emulate. 

EXPEDITING DISABILITY EVALUATIONS 

The Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs announced that they had 

formed a partnership to create and integrate their evaluation of service members 

into a single system. 

This Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) was designed to expedite the 

evaluation of sick and injured members so that the active component could concentrate and focus on the condition that made the individual unfit for active duty 

and prepare the service member for follow-up with the Department of Veterans Affairs with a single evaluation occurring rather than two separate and distinct evaluations. The goal of the IDES was to shorten the average time from the time an 

active duty member first sought an evaluation to the date the member received a 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

66 

VA check from 540 days to 295 days ( with Reservists and Guard members taking 

an additional ten days). 

The new program has woefully missed its’ goal with only 19% achieving the goal 

in 2011. 

This is a worthy goal, it but requires a greater dedication of people, funding and 

technology to fulfill this goal. 

Therefore, the Jewish War Veterans of the USA calls upon the Congress and the 

Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs to commit to achieving this goal by 

investing all the requisite resources without reservation and without delay. 

REWRITING THE STOLEN VALOR ACT 

Our Supreme Court has stricken the Stolen Valor Act as an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment’s right of free speech. This decision by our Supreme 

Court allows liars, con artists and impersonators to gain prestige, financial rewards, 

and other benefits from their lies. 

Those men and women who earned these Medals through their bravery, often 

paid for with their blood and lives. 

There must be developed a law that can meet the Constitutional mandate while 

penalizing these liars, con artists and impersonators as frauds and which subjects 

them to penalties for perpetrating their frauds upon others. The Department of Defense could and must prepare a roster of the men and women who are the recipients 

of these Medals demonstrating valor and courage. 

The Jewish War Veterans of the USA calls upon the Congress to immediately 

enact a law that does not impinge upon a citizen’s freedom of speech but does impose sanctions upon anyone who employs such prevarications for any form of gain 

be it pecuniary, political, etc. 

The Jewish War Veterans of the USA calls upon the Department of Defense to 

immediately assemble a list of the men and women who are the recipients of the 

various Medals which denote valor and bravery and a list of those who have committed valor fraud and thievery. 

SUSTAINING PRIORITY AND FUNDING FOR ACCOUNTING 

OPERATIONS 

Congress mandated, within the 2010 National Defense Authorization Act, that the 

POW/MIA accounting community develop the capacity to identify 200 remains per 

year by 2015. 

Accounting for personnel listed as POW, MIA, KIA/BNA from the Vietnam War, 

Cold War, Korean War and World War II, as well as two listed as KIA/BNR from 

Desert Storm/ the Gulf War, and Afghanistan is of the utmost importance. 

The accounting community has made it clear that it would be impossible to meet 

the stated identification goal without increased funding and personnel, unless the 

available resources were redirected to the exhumation of gravesites in national 

cemeteries or selected sites of multiple casualties, thus diminishing ongoing efforts. 

Recent United States policy indicates interest in renewing accounting efforts in 

North Korea has added additional requirements and, despite assurances from the 

White House, Department of Defense and U.S. Pacific Command that adequate 

funds will be available, there is a continuing concern that the current budgetary 

constraints will impact negatively on the accounting mission. 

Political circumstances, environmental conditions and policy interests pertaining 

to each of the countries in which United States personnel were lost during the Vietnam War, Korean War, Cold War and World War II differ greatly, some posing significant challenges in obtaining agreements for access and cooperation. 

Be it resolved that the Jewish War Veterans of the USA calls upon the Congress 

to appropriate fund and provide personnel for the fiscal years 2013–2018 necessary 

to expand the pace and scope of American field investigations and remains-recovery 

operations to ensure that answers for the families of American men and women still 

missing and unaccounted for from all our Nation’s past wars are pursued simultaneously as a matter of the highest national priority of the United States Government and the American people. 

DOD MISSION IN DANGEROUS TIMES 

The Department of Defense is facing large cuts in the near future. JWV believes 

this nation must maintain adequate force levels and adequate equipment levels. 

Military readiness does not come cheaply. Our military personnel should all have 

a reliable benefits package that will never be reduced. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

67 

Today’s active-duty service members and those who serve in the National Guard 

and Reserve components have volunteered to stand watch in this nation’s defense. 

Yet few stand watch for them. Basic benefits of their service, from retirement to 

TRICARE, are under assault. The defenders of the country need to be able to focus 

on defending this country. They must not worry their benefits will be pulled out 

from beneath them while they are focused on more pressing concerns such as terror 

plots, IEDs, and insurgents seeking to undermine hard-fought gains. 

The Congress must insure that DoD is funded to meet all its missions including 

possible overseas threats from Iran, North Korea, and even China. 

BACK–UP TO DOD 

VA Hospitals must be adequately funded, staffed and equipped to perform their 

vital role as this nation’s only back-up for DoD medical facilities. U.S. military personnel could possibly suffer casualties exceeding the capacity of the combined military medical treatment facilities. In such a case, the VA would be vital to the nation. JWV again strongly urges the Congress to fund the VA to fully handle this 

potential workload. 

CONCLUSION 

Chairman Sanders and Chairman Miller, our great nation must care for its veterans. Our country must, therefore, pay for the costs involved. 

At our annual national conventions our members work diligently to develop our 

legislative priorities. Our dedicated resolutions chairman, PNC Michael Berman, 

works very diligently to develop our resolutions and to bring them before our convention delegates. Following further fine-tuning by our convention delegates, our 

resolutions are finalized, and become our legislative priorities for the coming year. 

We thank you for the opportunity to present them to you today. 

f 

Prepared Statement of Vivianne Cisneros Wersel 

Distinguished Chairmen and Members of the Senate and House Committees on 

Veterans Affairs, Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. is grateful for the privilege of 

testifying on issues pertaining to widows and widowers of our Nation’s veterans. 

My name is Vivianne Wersel and I am a member of the Government Relations 

Committee of Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. 

Gold Star Wives of America, Incorporated (GSW) was founded in 1945 and is a 

Congressionally Chartered organization of widows and widowers of veterans who 

died while serving on active duty or died of a service-connected cause. 

GSW’s current members are widows and widowers of military members who 

served during World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the 

conflicts in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and every period in between. GSW is an allvolunteer organization encompassing approximately 8,500 members. 

Our primary mission is to support widows and widowers after the death of their 

spouse and provide a place for widows and widowers to connect with each other. 

GSW also provides information about survivor benefits and assists widows and widowers in obtaining these benefits. We strive to raise the awareness of Congress, the 

public, the veterans’ community and the military community to the many inequities 

existing in our survivor benefit programs. 

Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) 

In 1956, DIC was established by the Servicemen’s and Veterans’ Survivor Benefit 

Act. DIC is an indemnity payable to survivors of military service members and veterans who die on active duty or die from a service connected cause. 

According to the fiscal year 2012 VA Office of Survivors Annual Report1 , 338,595 

surviving spouses receive DIC. 

There are two types of DIC for surviving spouses2 - rank-based DIC which is 

being phased out and flat rate DIC which is $1215 per month for calendar year 

2013. To date the surviving spouses of veterans who served in military pay grades 

E1 through E6 have been phased into flat rate DIC. 

The base dollar value of flat rate DIC was set in 1993 when flat rate DIC was 

initiated and has been increased only by cost of living allowances (COLA) since that 

time. 

Flat rate DIC is currently 43 percent of the VA Disability Compensation received 

by veterans rated with a 100% disability. The Civil Service Retirement System and 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

68 

the military retirement system survivor programs provide 55 percent of the retirement pay of a CSRS employee or deceased military service member to the surviving 

spouse. The current VA compensation rate for a VA rated 100% disabled veteran is $2816. If flat rate DIC were calculated at 55% of $2816, flat rate DIC would be $1548 

which would be an increase of $333 per month. The lowest rank-based DIC rate is $1215 (E1–E6) and the highest basic DIC rate is $2594 (O10). If you add the current amount of rank-based DIC of all 23 basic 

ranks (E1–E9, W1–W4, O1–O10) and divide by 23 the result averages $1534. This 

small difference between the requested increase ($1548) and the average rank-based 

DIC ($1534) indicates that the overall cost to the Government for DIC was originally calculated as 55% of the overall cost of to the Government of VA disability 

compensation of a 100% disabled veteran. This ratio needs to be restored. 

Elimination of the Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) Offset 

to the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) 

If a surviving spouse is eligible to receive both SBP and DIC, SBP is reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount of DIC the surviving spouse receives despite the fact 

that SBP and DIC are different benefit programs for different purposes by different 

government departments. DIC is indemnity compensation for the early death of a 

military or veteran spouse due to a service connected cause. SBP is an earned and 

purchased annuity based on a percentage of the military service member’s retirement pay intended to provide the surviving spouse with income after the death of 

the service member. The DIC offset to SBP needs to be repealed. 

Only surviving spouses of active duty or retired military service members suffer 

the DIC offset to SBP. Surviving children do not suffer this offset. Surviving spouses 

of Federal employees do not suffer this offset. 

According to a report from the Department of Defense Office of the Actuary as 

of September 30, 2012, there were 59,241 surviving spouses subject to the DIC offset 

to SBP. Of those 59,241 surviving spouses 35,124 are fully offset and receive DIC 

and no SBP and 24,117 receive some SBP and DIC. 

SBP 3pays an annuity to surviving spouses of retired military service members 

who purchased SBP at retirement, surviving spouses of military service members 

who died on active duty and were retirement eligible when they died, and surviving 

spouses of military service members who died on active duty post 9–11. Unless the 

retired service member chooses a lesser amount, surviving spouses receive 55% of 

the service members retirement pay or 55% of what the service member’s retirement 

pay would have been had he lived long enough to retire. 

Military retirement pay is deferred compensation,4 i.e., when the service member 

was on active duty he or she accepted less pay in exchange for retirement pay. If 

the service member chooses to purchase the full amount of SBP, premiums for SBP 

are 6.5% of the retired service member’s retirement pay. 

Surviving spouses of retired service members who purchased SBP and who are 

also entitled to DIC receive an actuarially calculated partial refund of the SBP premiums the military spouse paid; the Government retains part of the premiums to 

pay for the reduced amount of SBP the surviving spouse receives. This partial refund is made without interest despite the fact that the Government had the use of 

the premiums for many years. The partial refund is refunded as a lump sum and 

the surviving spouse must pay income taxes on this lump sum in the year it is received. 

As you will see in the videos done by Jeanette Pavini for USA Today, many service members and many surviving spouses are unaware that their SBP will be offset 

by DIC.5 

We are most grateful for the Special Survivor Indemnity Allowance (SSIA) which 

Congress provided to those who suffer the DIC offset to SBP. As it is now this SSIA 

simply goes away at the end of FY 2017. We hope that the DIC offset to SBP can 

be repealed, but if it is not, we would like to see SSIA stabilized and extended to 

the years beyond FY 2017. 

The Veterans Disability Benefit Commission (VDBC) recommended in 2007 that 

surviving spouses of military service members be allowed concurrent receipt of full 

SBP and full DIC.6 

Surviving spouses who assigned SBP to the children need to be allowed to reselect 

the SBP for themselves. Children receive the full amount of SBP without offset. Recent surviving spouses of those who died on active duty were allowed and encouraged to assign their SBP benefit to the children. Many of these surviving spouses 

made the decision to assign the SBP to the children without appropriate explanation 

or counseling. These surviving spouses assigned the SBP to the children without reVACREP180 with DISTILLER

69 

alizing that the children would only receive SBP until they reached the age of majority and that the surviving spouse would lose SBP for life. 

Surviving spouses may remarry at or after age 57 and receive both full SBP and 

full DIC. It is utterly ridiculous that surviving spouses must find another mate and 

remarry to receive benefits that the deceased military spouse earned and/or purchased. All surviving spouses eligible for both benefits should receive full DIC and 

full SBP whether or not they choose to remarry. 

Surviving spouses of retired military service members who remarry at or after the 

age of 57 must repay the partial refund of premiums they received at the time of 

their spouse’s death. If they cannot repay the partial refund in one lump sum, the 

Government charges interest on the unpaid balance. Since only the most recent 3 

years of income tax returns may be amended, most of those who repay the partial 

refund of premiums cannot reclaim the income taxes they paid on the lump sum 

refund of premiums. 

CHAMPVA–26 and TRICARE Young Adult 

Surviving families of military service members who died on active duty and retired service members who died of a service connected cause receive TRICARE. Surviving families of veterans who died of a service connected cause and are not entitled to TRICARE receive CHAMPVA. 

• CHAMPVA–26 (H.R. 288) would provide health care coverage for surviving 

young adult children up to age 26 with no premiums. • TRICARE offers health care coverage for young adults up to age 26 7also, however TRICARE requires premiums of $176 per month for Prime coverage, or 

$152 per month for Standard coverage per young adult covered. • The Federal Employees Health Benefit Plan (FEHBP) extended health insurance coverage of young adult children up to age 26 with no increase in premiums. 

Surviving spouses of military service members covered by TRICARE and surviving spouses of veterans covered by CHAMPVA receive the same amount of DIC. 

Due to the DIC offset to SBP, 60% of military surviving spouses otherwise entitled 

to SBP are completely offset. 

In essence DoD retains the SBP that the surviving spouse does not receive in the 

Military Retirement Trust Fund and then demands that the surviving spouse make 

additional contributions to DoD in the form of TRICARE premiums. 

It is grossly inequitable for surviving spouses who receive no SBP to be expected to pay premiums of $152 per month for health care coverage for young adult children when surviving spouses covered by CHAMPVA and FEHBP receive this same 

benefit with no additional premium. This is especially egregious if the surviving 

spouse must pay premiums for two or more young adult children. 

Payment of TRICARE premiums for young adults should be waived for all surviving spouses who suffer the DIC offset to SBP. 

TRICARE Fees 

All surviving spouses and surviving children of military service members who died 

on active duty or died of a service connected cause should be exempt from any increases in TRICARE fees and any new TRICARE fees which might be levied. 

• Currently surviving children of service members who died on active duty receive 

TRICARE Prime without payment of fees until they reach the age of majority. • Surviving spouses and children of veterans who served in the military but did 

not retire, surviving spouses who have remarried and whose second or subsequent marriage has terminated and surviving spouses who remarry after the 

age of 57 receive CHAMPVA and most medications without charge. Surviving 

spouses and children who are entitled to TRICARE cannot use CHAMPVA and 

therefore lose part of the indemnity compensation from the VA. • Surviving spouses of those who died on active duty post 9–11 receive TRICARE 

Prime for 3 years without payment of fees and are exempt from fee increases. • Surviving spouses of those who died on active duty pre 9–11 and those who died 

of a service connected cause pay TRICARE fees for themselves and their children. 

Despite all the different categories many of the surviving spouses in each category receive flat-rate DIC of $1215 per month. All surviving spouses and surviving children whose military sponsor died on active duty or as the result of a service connected cause should be exempt from TRICARE fee increases and any new TRICARE 

fees that are levied. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

70 

Education Benefits 

The cost of a college education has increased substantially in recent years. The 

price of tuition, books, fees and living expenses is significantly more than in past 

years. 

The Chapter 35 education benefit of approximately $9878 per month for a fulltime college student does not come close to covering the cost of tuition, books, fees 

and living expenses. Surviving children using Chapter 35 benefits to attend college 

receive no living allowance and no DIC. Chapter 35 education benefits need to be 

more closely aligned with the benefits provided for in the New GI Bill and Fry 

Scholarships. 

Most Federal education programs have had recent increases and changes, but 

Chapter 35 education benefits have been increased only by COLAs. 

Colleges often demand payment of tuition 2 or 3 months before classes actually 

start and the student does not receive payment of Chapter 35 benefits until 30 or 

45 days after the classes start – a period of 3 to 4 months. All tuition payments 

not paid directly to the college by the VA should be deferred until the student receives payment of the education benefit from the VA. For students using Chapter 

35 benefits to attend college, payment of tuition should be deferred nation-wide 

until benefits are received. 

Recent proposed legislation (H.R. 357 and S.257) requires states to provide instate tuition rates for veterans using Federal education benefits. To ensure that 

Federal education dollars are spent most effectively and efficiently, surviving 

spouses and dependents using Chapter 35 education benefits should be included in 

legislation to require that states provide in-state tuition rates. 

The additional costs involved in a college education must be paid either by the 

remaining parent or through student loans. It is very difficult for one parent of surviving children to provide the funds for a college education that would have been 

provided by two parents. 

Some states offer a tuition waiver to military and veterans’ survivors, but not all 

states do. Additionally, many of these tuition waivers only apply to a specific group 

of survivors such as the survivors of combat deaths and exclude the survivors of 

those who died on active duty or died of a service-connected cause. 

Social Security Consumer Price Index 

There has been much in the news lately about changing the Consumer Price 

Index (CPI) used to calculate inflation and the cost of living increase (COLA) for 

Social Security payments from a CPI–W to Chained CPI. 

• The CPI–U covers All Urban Consumers and covers 88 percent of the total population. 

• The CPI–W is currently used to calculate COLA for Social Security payments. 

The CPI–W is an inflation calculation based on Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers and covers 32 percent of the population. The CPI–W is a subset 

of the CPI–U. 

• The Chained CPI (C–CPI–U) is based on the same population as the CPI–U and 

on the idea that if the price of one item increases the consumer will purchase 

a lower-priced alternate item, e.g., if the price of oranges increases, the consumer will purchase apples instead of oranges. 

Changing from the CPI–W to Chained CPI would lower the rate of COLAs. Over 

time the Chained CPI would lower the amount of COLA for Social Security substantially. 

A change from CPI–W to Chained CPI would adversely impact not only Social Security benefits, but all benefits of veterans, disabled veterans, surviving spouses and 

children. COLAs on all benefits received by surviving spouses and children would 

also be calculated using the lower Chained CPI and over time create a substantial 

reduction in the benefits they receive.9 

VA Office of Survivors 

In 2009 Congress approved the VA Office of Survivor Assistance. GSW is very 

grateful for this office and for the advocacy and the excellent service Debra Walker 

and Scott Bell provide to survivors. 

It is often difficult for new survivors to find grief counseling and grief 

support groups. Grief counseling and grief support groups could be offered at very 

low or no cost by VA medical centers and clinics, by the VA Chaplains Service, or 

by VA Social Services. Contact information about grief counseling and support 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

71 

groups could be posted on the medical facility website so that survivors could easily 

find the necessary information. 

Training and appropriate reference material on survivor issues needs to 

be provided to VA employees and the call center contractors who answer phone 

calls. A number of our members have called for information on survivor benefits and 

encountered someone who knew nothing about survivor benefits and apparently had 

no reference material to which to refer. 

CHAMPVA Dental Insurance Program 

CHAMPVA recipients need access to dental care to maintain their overall health. 

Congress enacted legislation requiring the VA to provide access to dental insurance 

for veterans, dependents and survivors through a CHAMPVA pilot program. Over 

3 years have passed and this dental program is not yet in place. We are grateful 

for this legislation, but perplexed at the length of time which has passed without 

implementation. 

DIC and Remarriage at 55 

In 2003 Congress approved legislation to allow surviving spouses who remarried 

at or after the age of 57 to retain DIC benefits. Both the military Survivor Benefit 

Plan and the Federal employees’ survivor benefit plan allow surviving spouses to 

remarry at age 55 and retain benefits. Allowing surviving spouses to remarry at age 

55 and retain their DIC benefit would make the age a surviving spouse may remarry consistent with other Government programs for surviving spouses. 

Prohibit Desecration of the U.S. Flag 

Gold Star Wives of America urges passage of H. J. Res. 19, proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States giving Congress power to prohibit the 

physical desecration of the flag of the United States. For the past 20 years, Gold 

Star Wives of America has participated in hearings before the House Committee on 

the Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Constitution because of our heartfelt belief in 

the American flag. We urge the passage of H.J. Res. 19. 

1 http://www.va.gov/SURVIVORS/OUTREACH.asp 

2 http://www.benefits.va.gov/COMPENSATION/resources—comp03.asp#BM01 

3 http://www.dfas.mil/retiredmilitary/provide/sbp.html 

4 http://militarypay.defense.gov/reports/QRMC/ 11th Quadrennial Review of 

Military Compensation, Chapter 2, Page 20, Deferred Compensation 

5 http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/video/military-widows-must-remarry-to-receive-full-benefits-part-1/1959407678001 http://www.usatoday.com/media/cinematic/video/1695729/ 

6 VDBC Report, October 2007, Executive Summary, Allow Concurrent Receipt 

Honoring the Call to Duty: Veterans’ Disability Benefits - U.S. Senate 

7 http://www.tricare.mil/TYA 

8 http://www.gibill.va.gov/resources/benefits—resources/rates/CH35/ 

ch35rates100112.htm 

9 http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=f63f3003–9c5b-478d-810de09b52e4d7c5 http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=ca71ab54–06d2– 

42ec-ac6e-568141bb6798 

f 

Prepared Statement of Mark A. Kilgore 

THE FRA 

The Fleet Reserve Association (FRA) is the oldest and largest organization serving 

enlisted men and women in the active, Reserve, and retired communities plus veterans of the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard. The Association is Congressionally Chartered, recognized by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and entrusted to serve all veterans who seek its help. 

FRA was established in 1924 and its name is derived from the Navy’s program 

for personnel transferring to the Fleet Reserve or Fleet Marine Corps Reserve after 

20 or more years of active duty, but less than 30 years for retirement purposes. During the required period of service in the Fleet Reserve, assigned personnel earn retainer pay and are subject to recall by the Secretary of the Navy. 

FRA testifies regularly before the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees 

and Appropriations Subcommittees, and the Association is actively involved in the 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

72 

Veterans Affairs Voluntary Services (VAVS) program. A member of the National 

Headquarters’ staff serves as FRA’s National Veterans Service Officer (NVSO) and 

as a representative on the VAVS National Advisory Committee (NAC). FRA’s NVSO 

also oversees the Association’s Veterans Service Officer Program and represents veterans throughout the claims process and before the Board of Veteran’s Appeals. 

In 2011, 171 FRA Shipmates provided almost 12,000 volunteer hours of support 

at 59 VA facilities throughout the country, enabling FRA to achieve VAVS ‘‘Service 

Member’’ status. Members of the Auxiliary of the Fleet Reserve Association are also 

actively involved in the VAVS program and hold an Associate Membership seat on 

the committee which requires involvement at 15 or more VA facilities. 

FRA became a member of the Veterans Day National Committee in August 2007, 

joining 24 other nationally recognized Veterans Service Organizations on this important committee that coordinates National Veterans’ Day ceremonies at Arlington 

National Cemetery. The Association is a leading organization in The Military Coalition (TMC), a group of 34 nationally recognized military and veteran’s organizations 

collectively representing the concerns of over five million members. FRA senior staff 

members also serve in a number of TMC leadership positions. 

FRA celebrated its 88th anniversary on November 11, 2012, and its motto is ‘‘Loyalty, Protection, and Service.’’ 

CERTIFICATION OF NON–RECEIPT OF FEDERAL FUNDS 

Pursuant to the requirements of House Rule XI, the Fleet Reserve Association has 

received no federal grant or contract during the current fiscal year or either of the 

two previous fiscal years. 

INTRODUCTION 

Distinguished Chairmen, Ranking Members and other Members of the Committees, thank you for the opportunity to present the Association’s 2013 legislative 

goals. Before addressing specific issues, it’s important to note that veteran’s benefits 

are earned through service and sacrifice in the defense of this great Nation and are 

unlike other entitlements or benefits programs. 

SEQUESTRATION AND THE 2014 VA BUDGET 

A top priority for FRA is to ensure that the VA budget is exempt from the effects 

of the March 1, 2013 sequestration deadline, and to also ensure that the likely extension of the FY 2013 continuing resolution (CR) after March 27, 2013 does not 

result in unanticipated cuts to VA programs. FRA thanks House Veterans Affairs 

Committee (HVAC) Chairman Miller and former SVAC Chairwoman Murray for 

their efforts to ensure that the entire Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) budget 

is exempt from ‘‘sequestration’’ cuts as mandated by the 2011 Budget Control Act 

(BCA). 

Despite this effort, sequestration, the impact of budgeting by CR without separate 

appropriations legislation, and delay of the Administration’s FY 2014 budget request 

has created significant anxiety within our membership and the entire veterans’ community. 

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) now serves more than eight million 

veterans and thanks to strong support from these committees and Congress continues to function via advanced appropriations. Our members urge the Administration and Congress to work together to ensure that the advanced appropriations 

amounts for FY 2013 are sustained and adequate to meet estimated demand for veterans health care – and ensure sufficient funding for FY 2014 and beyond as well. 

HVAC Chairman Jeff Miller (Fla.) and Ranking Member Mike Michaud (Me.) introduced the ‘‘Putting Veterans Funding First Act’’ (H.R. 813). The bill would require 

Congress to fully fund VA budget a year ahead of schedule by providing two-fiscal 

year budget authority, ensuring that all VA services will have timely, predictable 

funding in an era where continuing resolutions and threats of government shutdowns are all too frequent. 

FRA supports the recommendations of the FY 2014 Independent Budget (IB) 

which was recently released by AMVETS, Disabled American Veterans (DAV), Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA) and the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW). The IB 

has served as a guide for funding the VA for 27 years and provides detailed VA 

budget analysis to meet the challenges of serving America’s veterans. Recommendations for FY 2014 include: 

• $58.8 billion for VA health care, which is $1.3 billion more than the advanced 

appropriations from last year; 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

73 

• $2.4 billion for the Veteran’s Benefits Administration (VBA) which is $226 million than the FY 2013 request; • $900 million more for FY 2014 VA construction projects ($2.25 billion); and • $611 million for medical and prosthetic research which is $28 million more than 

the FY 2013 request. 

DISABILITY CLAIMS BACKLOG 

FRA views the growing backlog of disability claims as a threat to the Nation’s solemn commitment to properly care for disabled veterans. The cost of defending the 

Nation should include timely and adequate treatment of our wounded warriors. In 

FRA’s online February 2013 survey of veterans, nearly 80 percent of those responding view the disability claims backlog as ‘‘very important,’’ and more than 84 percent cite access to VA health care benefits as ‘‘very important.’’ 

In January 2012, the VA reported that more than 800,000 veterans were awaiting 

decisions, 60 percent of which were pending 125 days or more – an increase of more 

100% over the previous three years. As of February 18, 2013 there are nearly 

900,000 (897,714) disability claims pending with 69.9 percent pending for 125 days 

or longer. Thousands of additional claims adjusters have been hired since January 

2007, yet despite the additional resources and manpower, the backlog of disability 

claims continues to increase. Adding to the backlog are errors due to inadequate examination, inaccurate processing and lack of oversight. 

The Association has for many years urged VA to employ new and improved technology to better manage the flood of disability claims associated with the war efforts 

and to shrink the disability claims backlog. FRA appreciates efforts by the Veterans’ 

Benefits Administration (VBA) to improve the disability claims process. However, as 

is widely known by our VSOs and reported in various publications including the Marine Corps Times (‘‘VA head envisions radical Improvements in Backlog,’’ Nov. 19, 

2012), the problem is made more challenging by more claims arriving each year. The 

drawdown of troops serving in Afghanistan will likely also result in a million more 

claims each year for the next three years with 43 percent of claims coming from the 

Reserve Component that creates additional access challenges. 

The VBA is charged with achieving the ambitious goal of having disability claims 

pending no longer than 125 days, with a 98 percent accuracy rate, and is not only 

overwhelmed by the quantity of claims but also the complexity of many claims. 

The following, Recovering Warrior Task Force statement after its January 14–15, 

2013 meeting is noteworthy. ‘‘After 12 years of war and the implementation of legislative provisions, policies, and services, DoD and VA still are plagued with basic 

command and control, coordination, and communication issues that cause inconsistencies and distrust across the agencies, ultimately affecting care for beneficiaries . . . 

We will have another system surge when the troops come home from Afghanistan, 

a ‘tsunami’ . . . that will again overwhelm the systems – and things will get worse 

before they get better . . . Recovering warriors and their families are starving for 

practical help – even while they are being overwhelmed by a massive volume of information they are given.’’ 

The quality of claims adjudication has also been a concern for FRA. For example 

The Washington Post, (‘‘Md Vets can face Extreme Waits,’’ Steve Vogel, Feb. 4, 

2013) cites that at Regional Office Baltimore, Maryland, disability claims (are) pending 429 days on average and more than 25 percent of those claims are being mishandled. The Association’s February 2013 online survey reveals that 89 percent of 

veterans believe the quality of VA health benefits as ‘‘very important,’’ which is the 

highest rating of all VA quality-of-life benefits in the online survey. 

The Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS), a paperless claims program 

now used in 18 regional offices, is scheduled to become operational in all 56 regional 

offices this year has the potential to dramatically reduce the time it takes for processing disability claims. The Washington Post, (‘‘VA Entering the Digital Age for 

Claims,’’ Steve Vogel, Feb. 4, 2013) references ‘‘pilot testing at the Salt Lake City, 

Utah and Providence, Rhode Island offices [that] the VBMS cut the average time 

to process a case from 240 days to 119 days according to the agency.’’ VBMS will 

automate five steps of the standard claims adjudication process including establishment, development, evidence, rating and award. 

FRA appreciates the outreach and expanded communication by VA Undersecretary for Benefits Allison A. Hickey. Her leadership at VBA has strengthened and 

expanded partnerships and improved communications with FRA and other military/ 

veterans organizations. She has pushed for badly needed reform and encouraged a 

culture of change and reform at VBA. Noted improvements include expanded usage 

of the eBenefits website and disability benefit questionnaires (DBQ) completed by 

the claimant’s private physician that evaluate disabilities that are the equivalent to 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

74 

those completed by VA or VA-contracted examiners. (DBQs are 81 different templates that solicit medical information necessary to evaluate medical conditions.) 

We appreciate efforts to streamline the claims process, however, challenges remain with implementing and interpreting these processes by both VA and private 

sector physicians, even with accurately-completed DBQs and duplicative VA exams 

that slow down the disability claims process. 

Another important reform at the VBA is the creation of Quality Review Teams 

(QRT) in every regional office, charged with seeking out and correcting mistakes 

with disability claims processing, and providing end-of-month performance reviews 

intended to reduce lag-time in measuring quality from the current four months to 

one week and permit timely corrective action. The VBA created three segmented 

lanes for disability claims (Express, Core, and Special Ops) that should accelerate 

adjudication for ‘‘Express’’ claims from 250 days to 80 days, and reduce overall 

claims processing an average of 51 days. 

The VA is also cutting red-tape for veterans by eliminating the need to complete 

an annual Eligibility Verification Report (EVR). The VA has implemented a new 

process for confirming eligibility for benefits. In the past, beneficiaries had been required to complete an EVR each year to ensure their benefits continued. VA estimates it would have sent nearly 150,000 EVR’s to beneficiaries in January 2013. 

Eliminating these annual reports reduces the burden on veterans, their families, 

and survivors to submit routine reports to VA each year to avoid suspension of benefits. This will also free up more than 100 employees that processed EVRs that can 

work on eliminating the claims backlog. 

The VA also launched a new initiative that could eliminate the requirement for 

an in-person medical examination for some veterans and shorten the time it takes 

to process disability compensation claims. The initiative is called Acceptable Clinical 

Evidence (ACE). This is a joint effort by the VHA and the VBA to provide a veterancentric approach for disability examinations. The ACE process opens the possibility 

of doing assessments without an in-person examination when there is sufficient information in the record. 

The VBA has worked to increase the percentage of Fully Developed Claims (FDC) 

which consists of a complete application, all military and civilian medical treatment 

records, and relevant military records including the claimants DD 214. Claims submitted under the FDC program are currently processed on average within 115 days. 

VBA has a goal of increasing FDC claims to reach 20 percent of all claims. This 

would increase 153,000 claims adjudicated before the 125 day deadline. 

FRA continues to believe there is strong bipartisan support to further reform the 

system and lawmakers have made clear that they want to improve claims processing to eliminate bureaucratic delays and ensure more uniformity between 

branches of the military and the VA in how they rate disabilities. An effective delivery system is essential along with decisive and appropriate action to correct deficiencies and improve processes. That said ,VA can promptly deliver benefits to veterans only if it has modern technology, adequate resources, sufficient personnel 

training and staffing. 

WOUNDED WARRIORS & SEAMLESS TRANSITION 

FRA strongly supports the Administration’s efforts to create an integrated Electronic Health Record (iEHR) for every service member which would be a major step 

towards the Association’s long-standing goal of a truly seamless transition from 

military to veteran status for all service members and permit Department of Defense (DoD), VA, and private health care providers immediate access to a veteran’s 

health data. 

The importance of fully implemented interoperability of electronic medical records 

cannot be overstated. However, SecDef Leon Panetta and SecVA Eric Shinseki recently announced jointly that the departments are abandoning plans to create a single electronic health record for active duty military and veterans. And FRA shares 

concerns expressed by HVAC Chairman Miller at a February 27, 2013 hearing that 

this change could be viewed as a step backwards on this issue apparently due to 

budget pressures and higher costs. 

There is some sharing now between DoD, VA and the private sector, but more 

needs to be done. Wider expansion of data sharing and exchange agreements between VA, DoD and the private sector is needed. VA’s ‘‘Blue Button’’ initiative permits veteran’s online access to some medical history, appointments, wellness reminders and military service information, but most is only accessible only after inperson authentication. VHA is also moving forward on its paperless processes that 

is Health Insurance Portability and Protection Act (HIPPA) compliant. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

75 

FRA strongly supports the VA/DoD joint effort to invest more than $100 million 

in new research to improve diagnosis and treatment of post traumatic stress (PTS) 

and mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) in response to a August 31, 2012 Presidential 

Executive Order calling for DoD and VA to also establish an inter-agency task force 

to coordinate their efforts, and VA and Health and Human Services (HHS) will establish at least 15 pilot programs involving community-based health providers to expand mental health services in areas not well served by VA. 

The Veterans Affairs and Armed Services Committees must remain vigilant regarding their oversight responsibilities associated with ensuring a ‘‘seamless transition’’ for our Nation’s wounded warriors. In conjunction with this, FRA is concerned 

about shifting of departmental oversight from the Senior Oversight Committee 

(SOC) comprised of the DoD and VA secretaries per provisions of the FY 2009 National Defense Authorization Act, to the more lower echelon Joint Executive Council 

(JEC) which is now responsible for supervision, and coordination of all aspects of 

DoD and VA wounded warrior programs. This change is perceived by many as diminishing the importance of improving significant challenges faced by service members – particularly wounded warriors and their families – in transitioning from DoD 

to the VA. 

The Association notes the importance of the eBenefits web site which serves as 

an electronic portal for veterans, service members and their families to research, 

find, access, and in the near future manage their VA benefits and track progress 

on claims processing. The program is a service of the VA and DoD and was one of 

the recommendations of the President’s Commission on Care for America’s Returning Wounded Warriors (Dole/Shalala). There are now more than 1.86 million 

eBenefits users. 

The Association also strongly encourages support for the Navy’s Safe Harbor Program and the Marine Corps Wounded Warrior Regiment (WWR), programs that are 

providing invaluable support for these personnel before and after they transition to 

veterans’ status. 

MENTAL HEALTH/SUICIDE 

FRA believes post traumatic stress (PTS) should not be referred to as a ‘‘disorder.’’ 

This terminology adds to the stigma of this condition, and the Association believes 

it is critical that the military and VA work to reduce the stigma associated with 

PTS and TBI. Access to quality mental health service is a vital priority, along with 

a better understanding of these conditions and associated care and support that’s 

currently available. 

Suicide prevention is also a priority issue for FRA and the VA’s 2012 Suicide Data 

Report will hopefully help in reducing the number of veteran’s suicides. In the past, 

data on veterans who died by suicide was only available for those who had sought 

VA health care services. This also includes state data for veterans who had not received health care services from VA, which will help VA strengthen its aggressive 

suicide prevention activities. The report indicates that the percentage of veterans 

who die by suicide has decreased slightly since 1999, while the estimated total number of veterans who have died by suicide has increased. 

As many as 18 veterans are committing suicide every day and access to quality 

mental health services must continue to be a priority for the VA. In 2005 the VA’s 

13,000 mental health professionals were providing care for veterans. Today there 

are more than 20,000 mental health professionals at the VA and that number 

should continue to increase. The VA/DoD crisis hot line has assisted more than 

640,000 people and recued over 23,000 from potential suicide, and there must be 

readily available counseling support and expanded awareness of help that’s available to veterans in crisis. Expanding VA counseling to veteran’s family members, 

strengthening oversight of IDES, and requiring VA to establish accurate measures 

for mental health were included in the FY 2013 NDAA are also important in addressing this issue. 

The Association appreciates the White House efforts at stemming the tide of veteran suicides. President Obama signed an Executive Order on August 31, 2012 

aimed at reducing suicides and improving mental health services for veterans, active duty personnel and their families. The order requires the VA to increase capacity of its Veterans Crisis Hotline by 50 percent to ensure that veterans identified 

as being a danger to themselves or others are connected with a trained mental 

health professional within 24 hours. The order allows VA to refer veterans in need 

of immediate mental health care to the TRICARE network and directs the VA and 

the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to expand outreach efforts 

to service members and veterans, and fill all vacancies for mental health staff positions. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

76 

AGENT ORANGE 

From 1964–1975 more than 500,000 service members were deployed off the coast 

of Vietnam and may have been exposed to Agent Orange, a herbicide used in Vietnam. Past VA policy (1991–2001) allowed service members to file claims if they received the Vietnam Service Medal or Vietnam Campaign Medal. 

The Association appreciates the establishment of a presumptive service-connection 

for Vietnam veterans who have B cell leukemia, Parkinson’s disease or ischemic 

heart disease. These diseases are related to exposure to Agent Orange. VA Secretary 

Eric Shinseki’s decision was based upon an Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) 2010 report and this is a major step in the right direction, but FRA is advocating for a 

broader Agent Orange service-connection. 

However, a January 2013 VA statement referencing a careful review of another 

IOM report in 2011, entitled, ‘‘Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans and Agent Orange Exposure,’’ indicates that there is insufficient evidence to establish a presumption of exposure to herbicides for Vietnam veterans who served off the Vietnam 

coast during the conflict. 

FRA believes that decision maintains the status quo regarding disability claims 

of these so-called ‘‘Blue Water’’ veterans and that the IOM report validated the 2002 

Royal Australian Navy study that confirmed the desalinization process used on Australian and U.S. Navy ships actually magnified the dioxin exposure. The Association 

continues to seek a legislative remedy to reverse current policy so Blue Water veterans and military retirees who have health problems commonly associated with 

herbicide exposure will be eligible for service-related VA medical and disability benefits. 

FRA notes the VA’s efforts to expand presumption to ships exposed to Agent Orange during the Vietnam era. In January 2012 the Department added 47 ships to 

its list of Navy and Coast Guard vessels that may have been exposed to the Agent 

Orange herbicide. The list expanded as VA staff determined that a ship anchored, 

operated close to shore or traveled on the inland waterways and was exposed to the 

toxic herbicide. 

While the expanded VA policy to include veterans who sailed on ‘‘inland waterway’’ ships is significant, FRA believes it does not go far enough. The Association 

has received hundreds of calls from ‘‘blue water sailors’’ and their surviving spouses, 

stating that due to service on ‘‘their ships’’ in Vietnam waters, they too suffer or 

have died from many of the illnesses associated to presumed exposure to herbicides 

as their ‘‘brown water’’ and ‘‘boots on the ground’’ counterparts. 

The Association wishes to thank Representative Chris Gibson (N.Y.) for his introduction of H.R. 543 ‘‘Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act of 2013.’’ The bill was 

introduced with 42 original bi-partisan co-sponsors. FRA looks forward to the Senate 

introducing companion legislation and potential hearings on this priority issue of 

the Association 

DISABIITY RATING REVIEW 

Aggressive committee oversight of the Integrated Disability Evaluation System 

(IDES) is essential to ensuring that disability ratings established by this system are 

fair and consistent. FRA supports the modernization of the VA Schedule of Rating 

Disabilities to guarantee that the ratings are uniform between the different services, 

between enlisted and officers, and uniform between DoD and VA. 

The 2013 Independent Budget (IB), a recent IOM report, the final report (2007) 

of the Veterans Disability Benefit Commission (VDBC), and the Dole –Shalala Commission all agree that the current disability rating should be reformed to more fully 

take into account non-economic loss and quality of life factors when determining 

compensation. 

The Association also recommends that Congress change the current practice of 

rounding down veterans and survivors benefits to the next lowest dollar. Over time, 

the effect of rounding down can be substantial and our members have expressed 

concern about these effects. 

FRA urges Congress to authorize a presumption of service-connected disability for 

combat veterans and veterans exposed to high levels of noise and subsequently 

claim hearing loss or tinnitus. Currently, veterans must prove that the hearing 

problem was caused by military service. 

The Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) was mandated by the FY 2008 

National Defense Authorization Act to reassess the accuracy and fairness of disability claims that resulted in combined disability ratings of 20 percent or less for 

service members who were separated from service due to medical conditions rather 

than being medically retired. To be eligible for a PDBR review, service members 

must have been medically separated between September 11, 2001, and December 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

77 

31, 2009, with a combined disability rating of 20 percent or less, and found ineligible 

for retirement. PDBR can not downgrade a disability for veterans seeking a review 

if their rating and nearly half of those reviewed have been upgraded to 30 percent 

or more. FRA urges additional funding for mailing and other outreach efforts to eligible veterans and that adequate staff and resources be provided to the PDBR to 

be able to process an increase in the volume of veterans seeking a review of their 

ratings. 

COLA 

FRA supports Rep. Jon Runyan’s (N.J.) legislation (H.R. 569) to provide automatic 

annual cost-of-living-adjustments (COLA) for veterans with service connected disabilities and survivors of certain disabled veterans receiving dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC). Currently Congress must authorize veteran’s COLA legislation every year. Runyan’s legislation would make this increase automatic just like 

the automatic annual increases for military retirees. 

The Department of Labor’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) is used to determine annual COLAs for various benefit programs. Recent budget reduction discussions have 

focused in part on the concept of swapping the CPI with the so-called ‘‘chained CPI’’ 

that takes into account the effect of substitutions that consumers make in response 

to changes in prices. That change over time would have a significant impact on the 

annual COLAs for military retirees and on veterans’ benefits. SVAC Chairman Bernie Sanders’ (Vt.) effort in leading opposition to the chained CPI and the Association 

is committed to ensuring equitable COLAs for military retiree’s retainer pay, veterans disability compensation, dependency and indemnity compensation for surviving spouses and children. 

POST 911 GI BILL 

The Association strongly supports the ‘‘GI Bill Tuition Fairness Act’’ (H.R. 357) 

that would require schools eligible for GI Bill education benefits to authorize veterans in-state tuition rates even though they may not be residents of the states 

where the schools are located. According to a recent Navy Times story, (Jan. 28, 

2013), ‘‘only 13 states now provide in-state tuition to non-resident veterans.’’ Those 

who volunteered to defend this Nation did not just defend the citizens of their home 

states, but the citizens of all 50 states, and the educational benefits they receive 

from the taxpayers should reflect that fact. The current limit on GI Bill tuition is 

in excess of $18,000 per semester and this legislation will ensure that veterans receiving benefits from the Post 911 GI Bill will have their tuition reimbursed, which 

was the intent of the original Post 911 GI Bill law. 

FRA appreciates enactment of the ‘‘Improving Transparency of Education Opportunities for Veterans Act’’ (H.R. 4057), sponsored by Rep. Gus Bilirakis (Fla.) that 

among its other provisions, highlights available educational resources to help GI Bill 

beneficiaries choose the school best meeting their educational needs. 

The Post 9/11 GI Bill is a tremendous benefit for service members who qualify 

for the program and has significantly improved the morale of those currently serving. The VA has provided more than $24.4 billion in tuition and benefits for more 

than 870,000 veterans, service members, and their families. The Association urges 

sustained oversight of the program to ensure that qualifying veterans and their 

families can make informed decisions about choosing the best educational program 

for their needs and that they receive benefits in a timely manner. The demand for 

Post 911 GI Bill benefits is expected to increase as the U.S. military disengages 

from Afghanistan and there is a drawdown of forces. 

Timely processing of GI Bill benefits has been a challenge for the VA, and FRA 

appreciates the VBA efforts to work with universities, colleges, and trade schools 

to improve the benefit payment process. By law the VA can not pay GI Bill benefits 

until the School Certifying Official (SCO) provides VA enrollment certifications. FRA 

appreciates the VA establishing an SCO hotline for schools having difficulty with 

the certification process. 

ACCESS TO VA CARE 

In 2009 there was a partial lifting of the ‘‘temporary’’ 2003 ban on enrolling Priority Group 8 veterans. VA opened enrollment for some (10 percent) of these beneficiaries and the intent was to gradually add 10 percent more enrollments each successive year, however the lifting of the ban stopped after the first year significantly 

limiting access to care. More than 260,000 veterans have been impacted by the policy. Our Nation made commitments to all veterans in return for their service and 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

78 

limiting enrollment conveys the wrong message to those currently serving and those 

who have served in the past. 

Expanding access to VA Hospitals and Clinics for TRICARE beneficiaries is important and FRA supports opportunities to expand DoD/VA joint facilities demonstration projects such as combining the VA Hospital and the Naval Hospital at 

Great Lakes Naval Base, Illinois, and ensuring that military retirees are not required to pay for care in VA facilities. All 153 VA medical centers accept TRICARE 

beneficiaries except for TRICARE for Life beneficiaries. 

The Association is concerned that the Inspector General has launched an investigation of the failure of medical protocols at the Buffalo VA Medical Center that 

could have exposed more than 700 patients to HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C. FRA 

welcomes HVAC plans to hold a hearing on the problems at that facility. 

FRA supports the CHAMPVA Children’s Protection Act (H.R. 288), sponsored by 

HVAC Ranking Member Rep. Mike Michaud (Maine), that increases from age 23 to 

26 the maximum age of eligibility for certain dependent children of veterans for 

medical care under the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the VA. This bill 

would bring CHAMPVA in line with TRICARE and the insurance requirements created by the Affordable Care Act. 

Finally, Congress should expand the VA Caregivers Act to cover full-time care 

givers of catastrophically disabled veterans before September 11, 2001. In addition, 

the Defense Centers of Excellence should be adequately funded and staffed. 

MEDICARE SUBVENTION 

FRA believes authorization of Medicare subvention for eligible veterans would improve access for Medicare-eligible veterans and enhance health care funding for the 

VA. Under current law, Medicare is not authorized to reimburse VA hospitals for 

care provided to Medicare eligible veterans. This results in veterans being forced to 

decide between receiving medical care through the VA, or using Medicare at a nonVA facility and foregoing the personalized care of a VA hospital. Most veterans pay 

into Medicare for most of their lives, yet the law prohibits them from benefitting 

from this via care at VA facilities later in life. 

WOMEN VETERANS 

In January 2013 the Pentagon lifted the ban on women in direct combat and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta stated that women have become an ‘‘integral part’’ of 

the military and have already demonstrated their willingness to fight during the 

wars of the last decade. Even before the change women were playing a significant 

role in the nation’s defense. 

During the past decade military roles and responsibilities have been broadened 

and the number of women serving has significantly increased. There are more than 

1.8 million women veterans and today they make up more than 15 percent of our 

active duty forces and 18 percent of the Reserve Component (RC). FRA strongly supports VA efforts to create an appropriate model of care for women veterans and the 

pilot program to provide child care services for women veterans who come to the 

VA for treatment of their wounds and injuries. Further, the VA should enhance its 

sexual trauma and other gender specific programs and continue to improve services 

tailored to women veterans in all VA facilities. 

VETERAN’S EMPLOYMENT 

Veteran’s unemployment and programs to assist them in finding jobs throughout 

our Nation are very important. In conjunction with these issues, FRA welcomed 

news that the Senate recently confirmed Keith Kelly to serve as the Department 

of Labor (DoL) Assistant Secretary for Veterans Employment and Training Service, 

a post that had been vacant since July of 2011. 

Employer tax credits for hiring veterans are authorized in the recently enacted 

Veterans Opportunity to Work to Hire Heroes Act (VOW). And veterans’ job fairs 

are being scheduled throughout the country in conjunction with the White House 

Business Council. These and other efforts have resulted in the veterans’ unemployment rate dropping to 6.7 percent, which is more than a full percentage point below 

the national average of 7.8 percent. TAP and DTAP sessions are now mandatory to 

also help with the transition of all service members to civilian life and post service 

employment. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

79 

TRANSITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 

FRA supported making the Transition Assistance Program (TAP) a mandatory 

program for service members leaving the military. TAP was established to offer job 

search assistance and related services for separating service members during their 

period of transition into civilian life. 

The Association concurs with the 2014 IB recommendation that stresses the importance of a new TAP curriculum that is relevant to today’s transitioning service 

members, and that Congress must track implementation of the new TAP efforts to 

ensure its effectiveness. Keith Kelly, the newly confirmed Department of Labor Assistant Secretary for Veterans Employment and Training Service, indicated during 

his confirmation hearing that he will implement the re-designed TAP. Currently 

multiple government agencies have jurisdiction (DoL, DoD, VA, and Department of 

Homeland Security) over the program and FRA supports shifting oversight of these 

programs to the VA. Kelly also pledged to improve outreach to service members and 

veterans to ensure they have access to this and other programs to help them find 

civilian jobs. 

VETERANS HOMELESSNESS 

FRA supports the goal of eliminating veterans homelessness by 2015. With assistance from the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) the VA has made progress 

on this issue. According to The Washington Post, (‘‘Donovan, Shinseki hit D.C. 

Streets for National Homeless Count,’’ Steve Vogel, Feb. 1, 2013), ‘‘Last year’s count 

found 62,619 homeless veterans, representing a 17.2 percent decline since 2009.’’ 

Since HUD and VA have joined forces more than 37,000 homeless veterans have 

been place in housing. 

FULL VETERAN STATUS FOR RESERVE COMPONENT SERVICE 

The Association supports full veteran status for Reservists with 20 years or more 

of service. FRA appreciates Sen. Mark Pryor’s leadership in the last session of Congress by introducing the ‘‘Honor American’s Guard-Reserve Retirees’’ (S. 491) bill 

and filing an amendment to the FY 2013 NDAA that unfortunately was not called 

for a vote. FRA also appreciates the leadership of Rep. Timothy Walz’s (Minn.) companion bill (H.R. 679) that passed the House by voice vote in the last session of Congress. 

COURT–ORDERED DIVISION OF VETERAN’S COMPENSATION 

The intent of service-connected disability compensation is to financially assist a 

veteran whose disability may restrict his or her physical or mental capacity to earn 

a greater income from employment. FRA believes this payment is that of the veteran and should not be a concern in the states’ Civil Courts. If a court finds the 

veteran must contribute financially to the support of his or her family, let the court 

set the amount allowing the veteran to choose the method of contribution. FRA has 

no problem with child support payments coming from any source. However, VA disability should be exempt from garnishment for alimony unless the veteran chooses 

to make payments from the VA compensation award. The Federal government 

should not be involved in enforcing collections ordered by the states. Let the states 

bear the costs of their own decisions. FRA recommends the adoption of stronger language offsetting the provisions in 42 USC, now permitting Federal enforcement of 

state court-ordered divisions of veterans’ compensation payments. 

NATIONAL CEMETERY ADMINISTRATION 

The National Cemetery Administration (NCA) maintains over three million 

gravesites at 131 national cemeteries in 39 states, the District of Columbia, and 

Puerto Rico that include 3.1 million gravesites. The VA estimates that about 22 million veterans are alive today. They include veterans from World War II, the Korean 

War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, and the War on Terror, as well as peacetime 

veterans. It is expected that one in every six of these veterans will request burial 

in a national cemetery. Annual internments are estimated to have increased to 

116,000 in the current fiscal year (FY 2013) and will remain at that level until 2015. 

FRA believes that transparency is an effective deterrent to bureaucratic mismanagement and welcomes the recently released VA Inspector General’s report that 

reviewed over three million veteran’s graves in 131 national cemeteries that indicated an error rate of less than 0.0003 percent. This report was a result of HVAC 

Chairman Miller’s call last year for a complete audit of gravesites to ensure all veterans and their dependents are buried in the correct graves. Our members appreVACREP180 with DISTILLER

80 

ciate the House Committee’s ongoing oversight to ensure that these problems do not 

arise again at NCA cemeteries. The VA has also indicated it will ‘‘tighten procedures’’ and will continue to conduct audits at the 17 cemeteries where problems 

were discovered. 

The Association supported the recent enactment of the ‘‘Dignified Burial and Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act’’ (S. 3202 P. L. 112–260) that authorizes the VA 

to furnish a casket or urn for a deceased veteran when VA is unable to identify the 

veteran’s next-of-kin and determines that sufficient resources are not otherwise 

available to provide for proper burial in a national cemetery. FRA appreciates the increased burial plot allowance from $300 to $700 effective 

October 1, 2011, although there is still a gap between the original value of the benefit and the current benefit. The Association also supports the FY 2013 IB recommendations to increase the plot allowance to $1,150. Further NCA’s Operations 

and Maintenance budget should be increased so it can meet increasing demands created by the aging veteran population. 

CONCURRENT RECEIPT 

FRA continues its advocacy for legislation authorizing the immediate payment of 

concurrent receipt of full military retired pay and veterans’ disability compensation 

for all disabled retirees. The Association appreciates the progress that has been 

made on this issue that includes a recently enacted provision fixing the CRSC glitch 

that caused some beneficiaries to lose compensation when their disability rating was 

increased. Chapter 61 retirees receiving CRDP, and CRDP retirees with less than 

50 percent disability rating that should also receive full military retired pay and VA 

disability compensation without any offset. 

The Association strongly supports legislation to provide additional improvements 

that include Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s recently introduced legislation 

(S.234), Rep. Sanford Bishop’s (N.Y.) ‘‘Disabled Veterans Tax Termination Act’’ (H.R. 

333) and Rep. Gus Bilirakis’ (Fla.) ‘‘Retired Pay Restoration Act’’ (H.R. 303). 

SCRA ENFORCEMENT 

Certain Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) protections have limits. SCRA 

only protects service members and their families from eviction from housing while 

on active duty due to nonpayment of rents that are $1,200 per month or less and 

covering housing leases up to $2,932.31 per month. These caps were established in 

2003 and FRA supports increasing the caps to account for today’s higher cost of living. The Association also wants to ensure that SCRA is enforced by regulatory agencies, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Office of Military 

Affairs. 

Abuses of service members’ rights were originally exposed by the House Veterans 

Affairs Committee under the leadership of Chairman Rep. Jeff Miller (Fla.) during 

a February 2011 hearing. The hearing revealed J.P. Morgan Chase Bank violated 

the SCRA by improperly charging higher-than-allowed interest on 4,500 active duty 

service members’ mortgages and foreclosing on 18 service members’ homes while 

they were deployed. These hearings lead to settlement between the Federal government, 49 state Attorneys General, and five of the largest mortgage loan servicers: 

Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and Ally Financial. 

SBP/DIC 

FRA supports the ‘‘Military Surviving Spouse Act’’ (H.R. 32) sponsored by Rep. 

Joe Wilson (S.C.), and understands that Senate companion legislation may be introduced soon that would repeal the SBP/DIC offset. This bill would eliminate the offset, also known as the ‘‘widow’s tax,’’ on approximately 60,000 widows and widowers 

of our Armed Forces. 

Current DIC payments are $1,215 and 2009 legislation partially addressed this 

inequity by authorizing an increase via the Special Survivor Indemnity Allowance 

of only $50 per month for that year, with increases to $100 in 2014. The above referenced legislation would increase the allowance to $150 per month in 2014 with 

gradual increases to $310 per month in 2017. 

SBP and DIC payments are paid for different reasons. SBP coverage is purchased 

by the retiree and intended to provide a portion of retired pay to the survivor upon 

his/her death, while DIC is indemnity compensation paid to survivors of service 

members who die of service connected causes. And it’s important to note that surviving spouses of federal civilian retirees who are disabled veterans and die of service connected causes receive DIC without offset to their federal civilian SBP benefits. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

81 

UNIFORMED SERVICES FORMER SPOUSES PROTECTION ACT (USFSPA) 

FRA urges Congress to examine the Uniformed Services Former Spouses-Protection Act (USFSPA) and support amendments to the language therein to protect its 

service members against State courts that ignore provisions of the Act. 

The USFSPA was enacted 29 years ago; the result of Congressional maneuvering 

that denied the opposition an opportunity to express its position in open public hearings. The last hearing, in 1999, was conducted by the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee rather than the Armed Services Committee which has oversight authority for 

amending the USFSPA. 

Few provisions of the USFSPA protect the rights of the service member, and none 

are enforceable by the Department of Justice or DoD. If a State court violates the 

right of the service member under the provisions of USFSPA, the Solicitor General 

will make no move to reverse the error. Why? Because the Act fails to have the enforceable language required for Justice or the Defense Department to react. The 

only recourse is for the service member to appeal to the court, which in many cases 

gives that court jurisdiction over the member. Another infraction is committed by 

some State courts awarding a percentage of veterans’ compensation to ex-spouses, 

a clear violation of U. S. law; yet, the Federal government does nothing to stop this 

transgression. 

There are other provisions that weigh heavily in favor of former spouses. For example, when a divorce is granted and the former spouse is awarded a percentage 

of the service member’s retired pay, the amount should be based on the member’s 

pay grade at the time of the divorce and not at a higher grade that may be held 

upon retirement. Additionally, Congress should review other provisions considered 

inequitable or inconsistent with former spouses’ laws affecting other Federal employees with an eye toward amending the Act. 

CONCLUSION 

In closing, allow me again to express the sincere appreciation of the Association’s 

membership for all that you and the Members of both of the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees and your outstanding staffs do for our Nation’s veterans. 

Our leadership and Legislative Team stands ready to meet with and assist you, 

other members of the Committees or their staffs at any time, to improve benefits 

for all veterans who’ve served this great Nation. 

f 

Prepared Statement of John Rowan 

Good morning, Chairmen Sanders and Miller, Ranking Members Burr and 

Michaud, and other members of these most distinguished House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees. I am most pleased to appear before you today to present 

on behalf of the members and families of Vietnam Veterans of America VVA’s legislative agenda and policy initiatives for this, the 113th Congress of the United 

States. 

First, though, I want to thank you for your efforts to assist veterans who need 

assistance, to monitor those agencies of government that need monitoring, and to 

address the myriad of issues that, quite frankly, need to be addressed, several of 

which you will find among VVA’s deepest concerns. 

As you know, although VVA is the only Vietnam veterans service organization 

chartered by Congress, we advocate on behalf of veterans of all eras, those who 

served before us and those who have served most recently in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which have supplanted our war as the longest in the history of the 

republic. 

I would hazard a guess that more than a few folks even in this room this morning 

are unaware that there is a solitary American serviceman who is missing in action 

in Southwest Asia. In the parlance of the Pentagon, he is a DUSTWUN, ‘‘Duty Station Whereabouts Unknown,’’ which doesn’t resonate as somberly as ‘‘Missing in Action.’’ 

You should know that getting the fullest possible accounting of the fates of America’s POW/MIAs has long been VVA’s top priority. At the conclusion of hostilities 

in the war in Vietnam, 2,646 American servicemen were listed as missing in Southeast Asia; at the beginning of this month, some 1,653 remained ‘‘unaccounted for.’’ 

VVA’s Veterans Initiative program, which reaches out to Vietnamese veterans, has 

led them to the burial sites of potentially thousands of their comrades. Importantly 

for us, it has enabled our emissaries to return with the remains of several of our 

brother soldiers. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

82 

VVA has identified and placed into two categories what we consider to be viable 

Top Priorities: Addressing the Legacy of Toxic Exposures and Fixing the VA. They 

can be accomplished if there is the political and/or the managerial will. They are 

achievable if we want them badly enough, and if we can marshal our service and 

veterans communities and work in concert to convince you, our elected officials, that 

these are of great importance for all Vietnam veterans and for our families and our 

survivors. Only one of these will likely require any significant outlay of funding, but 

its potential benefits for all of American society can be huge. 

Let us be clear: Vietnam Veterans of America continues to embrace the newest 

generation of veterans, who have served with such distinction in Southwest Asia, 

for their reception home and for the array of benefits accorded to them – the Post9/11 G.I. Bill, which significantly outdoes the educational benefits of even the original G.I. Bill Congress passed in 1944 in anticipation of the flood of returning servicemen and -women from Europe and the Pacific; and the Caregivers and Veterans 

Omnibus Health Services Act of 2010 that Congress enacted to assist family caregivers of catastrophically wounded or injured warriors in the wake of 9/11. Consistent with our founding principle, we will never abandon any generation of veterans. 

But while attention has appropriately been given to veterans of our nation’s recent and current wars, make no mistake: Vietnam veterans still have unmet needs. 

And we refuse to be passed by and dismissed or forgotten. 

This Administration has made real strides in recognizing the inequities we have 

suffered, and for this they – especially VA Secretary Eric K. Shinseki and President 

Barack Obama – deserve our thanks. Enactment of the Top Priorities we outline 

here, in both Addressing the Legacy of Toxic Exposures and Fixing the VA, can go 

a long way towards ameliorating some of these needs – not just for Vietnam veterans but for veterans of all eras. 

And make no mistake: When we reference ‘‘toxic exposures’’ we don’t mean only 

Agent Orange – dioxin – or the burn barrels so many of us stood next to in Vietnam. 

We are going well beyond our own concerns. We are also addressing the intense 

plume from the explosion in 1990 of the ‘‘ammunition dump’’ at a place called 

Khamisiyah during the Persian Gulf War; and we are concerned about the effects 

on those who worked in and lived near the scores of burn pits that were so much 

a part of the landscape of the American presence during the long years of Operation 

Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan and Operations Iraqi Freedom and New Dawn 

in Iraq. And as our understanding of toxic exposures increases, we strongly urge the 

Department of Defense to think prospectively, to anticipate and not just react, to 

the likelihood of similar exposures in future conflicts as part of the true ‘‘cost of 

war’’ – and the lifelong, even intergenerational legacies they may generate. 

U.S. and Allied troops are for the most part out of Iraq. The President has promised that almost all American troops will exit Afghanistan by the end of 2014. As 

long as our forces are in harm’s way, there is a reservoir of sympathy for their service and their sacrifices. This translates into protected funding for VA personnel and 

programs. Once the shooting ceases and all the troops return to our shores – even 

though the VA will have the enormous task of dealing with their wounds both physical and mental for the rest of their days – it is likely that Congress will no longer 

be so generous. This we Vietnam veterans know only too well. 

Addressing the Legacy of Toxic Exposures 

Not all wounds of war are immediately obvious. Much has been written about the 

impacts of combat on the human psyche, and such mental ills known now by their 

acronyms – PTSD (Post-traumatic Stress Disorder) and TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) – have been accorded much attention by the Pentagon, prodded, as it were, 

by the press and the public and the national veterans’ service community. 

Not so evident are the insidious long-term effects of exposures to toxic substances. 

Substances like dioxin. And mustard gas. And sarin and VX and BZ. As we can now 

testify, symptoms can present a decade or more after exposure and separation from 

service. And by ‘‘long-term effects’’ we don’t mean only on the veteran. We refer as 

well to their progeny, a generation or more into the future. They are in effect also 

wounded by the war in which their mother or father served. There has been a paucity of research in this area. You would think – you would hope – that the VA, with 

its multi-million dollar budget for research, would try to initiate at least a few studies in this area. But you would be wrong. 

To help right this wrong, VVA has developed a bill we expect to be introduced 

initially in the House of Representatives. We intend to identify champions for this 

legislation and seek co-sponsors from both sides of the aisle to move this bill, to get 

a hearing in the appropriate committee, and then push on from there. The CBO, 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

83 

the Congressional Budget Office, will score the bill: make no mistake, there will be 

a cost to do it right. But the cost is worthwhile, and the cause is righteous. 

The legislation we have crafted , which we are calling the Veterans’ Family Preservation, Health Maintenance, and Research Act of 2013, embraces these elements: 

• A veteran’s military medical/health history shall be a mandatory piece of the 

electronic patient medical treatment system to be developed in concert with the 

national rollout of this system; 

• A database registry within the Veterans Health Administration, the VHA, modeled on the VA’s Hepatitis C Registry, shall be established for veterans exposed 

to Agent Orange/ dioxin that would replace the current registry; similar registries shall be established for the Persian Gulf War, Operations Iraqi Freedom/ 

New Dawn and Enduring Freedom, the Global War on Terror, and other significant deployments, e.g., Bosnia, Somalia, the Philippines; and for any duty station in CONUS, e.g., Camp Lejeune, Air Station El Toro, or overseas military 

installation, e.g. Guam, Okinawa, potentially contaminated by toxic substances; 

• A national Center for the Treatment and Research of Health Conditions suffered by the Progeny of Veterans Exposed to Toxic Substances during their military service shall be established; 

• An Advisory Committee to oversee the work done at the Center, and to advise 

the Secretaries of Health and Human Services and Veterans Affairs on issues 

related to the research, care, and treatment provided for in this bill, as well as 

on the benefits and services needed by the progeny of veterans exposed to toxic 

substances during their military service, also shall be established; 

• An Office of Extramural Research, the focus of which shall be on environmental 

studies of toxic exposures and other hazards experienced by troops during their 

service in the United States military, shall be established, and funded on its 

own dedicated budget line, by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs; 

• An Extramural Research Advisory Council to advise the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs and the Director of Extramural Research on guidelines for research proposals and to weigh the evidence of various epidemiological studies on the 

health effects of toxic exposures on veterans and their progeny, shall also be established; and 

• A coordinated, ongoing, national outreach and education campaign using such 

means as direct mail, on-line media, social media, and traditional media to communicate information about such exposures and health conditions, as well as 

the existence of the National Center to all eligible U.S military veterans and 

their families affected by incidents of toxic exposures, shall be conducted. 

Extending the Relationship with the IOM 

Since 1996, the Institute of Medicine, the IOM, a component entity of the National Academy of Sciences, has been producing, under contract with the VA, biennial editions of Veterans and Agent Orange. The next one, representing its reviews 

of the scientific literature in 2012, will be the last, unless Congress renews its mandate to the VA to continue its relationship with the IOM to empanel experts every 

two years to review the literature, conduct hearings across the country, and issue 

the Update. 

Although the Update does not make recommendations, its findings of degrees of 

association are crucial in helping the VA evaluate a health condition to determine 

whether or not it should be considered as a presumptive for a service-connected disability rating. It is critical that Congress pass legislation to direct the VA to renew 

its contract with the IOM for at least another decade. Just as more research must 

be conducted, so must such research be evaluated. 

Fixing the VA 

Oversight and Accountability 

As we did for the 112th Congress, we again want to make it clear: Funding is 

not the primary issue when it comes to the ever-ballooning backlog of claims and 

appeals encountered by the beleaguered Veterans Benefits Administration. We will 

continue to work with the VBA to revamp the overburdened compensation and pension system, integrating the fruits of several IT pilot projects that have shown exceptional promise, along with competency-based testing of service representatives 

and VA adjudicators and a still-evolving array of necessary reforms. 

Because VA ‘‘challenge training’’ for new raters has shown promising gains in efficiency and quality, the VA would be wise to quickly deploy this model to all staff. 

This should ensure that all are up to date on the current rules and initiatives. Also, 

the ‘‘lane’’ model has shown efficiency gains but is not being deployed for all claims. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

84 

Why not? This model needs to be expanded to include non-rating claims such as 

adding and removing dependents, to reduce the number of overpayment cases. 

Yet for reforms to truly succeed, there must be far better oversight of and by managers who are paid very well to administer a system that is all too obviously not 

functioning as it ought to. Management audits and assessments must be a component of annual performance reviews that are clear, specific, and success-oriented. 

There must also be focused and hard-hitting oversight by the Veterans’ Affairs Committees in both the House and Senate, as well as in the Appropriations and Budget 

Committees. We have been pleased with the progress under the leadership of Under 

Secretary for Benefits Allison Hickey. She has been a breath of fresh air. Still her 

greatest challenge is to upend an entrenched corporate culture long resistant to 

change. She has also been daunted by certain persistent IT problems. 

On a parallel track, there needs to be real accountability in the management of 

the Veterans Health Administration. With Advance Appropriations now law for a 

trio of the VHA’s medical accounts, there can be no excuses as to why a VA medical 

center fails to hire the nurses it needs as it enters a new fiscal year, or does not 

purchase the new MRI machine that its radiologists insist they must have, or give 

the go-ahead for several of the small yet pivotal construction projects that in the 

past would have been put off pending passage of the budget for the next fiscal year. 

VVA maintains that measures to ensure accountability must be essential elements in funding the VA. Key to achieving this is to significantly overhaul the system of bonuses for Senior Executive Staff to reward only those who have taken that 

extra measure, who have walked that extra mile, to ensure that what they are responsible for has been done well, on time and within budget; and for those who innovate and improve the systems and projects under their auspices. Bonuses should 

be withheld from those who just do their job – that is, after all, why they are handsomely paid. Those who perform poorly need to be removed or reassigned; and any 

manager or supervisor who gets caught lying to a veteran, to their supervisor, or 

to a Member of Congress should be dismissed. And bonuses should be given with 

a caveat attached: If you accept the bonus, you promise to stay with the VA for a 

given period of time, and not just take the money and run. 

Outreach 

There are approximately 22 million veterans in the United States today. Twothirds of them never interact with the VA at all. They have, or have had, jobs. They 

go to their own private physicians when they need to. Or they may be uninsured. 

They have no cause to venture into a VA medical center or regional office. Most are 

ignorant of the array of benefits to which they have earned by virtue of their military service. Even the one-third of vets who do interact with the VA’s healthcare 

system and/or its benefits administration are not familiar with much of what is 

available to them, to their families and their survivors. 

Why? Because the VA has historically done a shoddy job at best of reaching out 

to America’s veterans. And even if a vet goes to a VA medical center or communitybased outreach center to be treated for a combat-related wound or injury, more often 

than not s/he will not be given information directing them to apply for disability 

compensation benefits through the Veterans Benefits Administration, whose computer system does not synch with that of the Veterans Health Administration. And 

still the VA and DoD keep promulgating the fantasy of a ‘‘seamless transition.’’ 

The VA has an ethical obligation, as well as a legal responsibility, to inform all 

veterans and their families not only of the benefits to which they are entitled, but 

also about any possible long-term health problems they may experience that might 

derive from when and where they served. 

It is only in the past few years, however, that the VA has begun to take its responsibility to reach out seriously. They are customizing benefits handbooks for 

every living veteran. They are opting for paid advertising in select markets to reach 

targeted populations of veterans. They are using social media to reach our youngest 

generation of vets. They are attempting, at long last, to get out helpful messages, 

e.g., ‘‘If you served, you deserve.’’ 

While Secretary Shinseki and his team are to be applauded for their initiatives 

in this realm, their efforts still seem scattershot and limited. We have yet to see 

a unified, strategic communications plan, one that integrates TV and radio ads, billboards, ads and feature stories in select popular publications, and social media. 

Taken together, these can have a dramatic impact, not only in informing veterans 

– and perhaps most importantly, their families – about issues and benefits, but also 

in reassuring the community of veterans that the VA really is living up to its founding principle, taken from Lincoln: To care for him who shall have borne the battle, 

and for his widow, and his orphan. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

85 

Extending the Caregivers Act 

VVA supported legislation to assist family caregivers of catastrophically wounded 

or injured warriors after 9/11. Just as we saved badly – desperately, horribly – 

wounded troops during our war, troops who would have died during World War II 

or Korea, thanks to the bravery and the tenacity of our medevac crews and military 

medical personnel at evacuation hospitals, this new generation of medevac crews 

and medical personnel have been saving catastrophically wounded warriors who 

would surely have died in Vietnam. Heart-rending testimony before congressional 

committees by some of these surviving veterans, and by their wives and mothers, 

moved Congress to pass the Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health Services Act 

of 2010 to assist family caregivers of catastrophically wounded or injured warriors 

after 9/11. 

There was a caveat in this legislation: that the VA Secretary is to report to Congress by May 2013 on how the caregiver program has been working, and what, in 

his judgment, might be the efficacy of extending the program to embrace family 

caregivers of veterans of Vietnam and Somalia and the first fight with Saddam 

Hussain in the Persian Gulf. When that report is completed and is delivered, will 

caregivers who have given up careers to spend their lives caring for a beloved brother or husband or father, mother or sister, whose wounds or injuries have required 

constant attention so that s/he could live in a home setting be pleased that they 

might receive some of the benefits of this legislation at long last? How many caregivers of Vietnam veterans will potentially be eligible to become part of the caregivers program? And who in Congress will step to the plate to correct what is very 

clearly a gross inequity? 

Cleaning Up the CVE 

The VA’s Center for Veterans’ Entrepreneurship is supposed to ensure that a 

small business owner who claims to be a veteran, or a disabled veteran, really is 

what s/he claims to be, and is therefore eligible to bid as such on government contracts. Sounds like a righteous and proper function of a government agency, right? 

Well, right only in theory. The operation of the CVE has been charitably characterized as a ‘‘mess’’ that is causing thousands of veteran and service-disabled veteran 

small business owners to be deprived of millions of dollars in contracting opportunities after having been given a bureaucratic runaround and then been told that they 

do not qualify as a legitimate veteran or disabled veteran-owned entity. 

It has become apparent that either the regulations that govern the operation of 

the CVE are fundamentally flawed or that the adjudication process is out of control 

and not being properly managed. Verifications, which had a denial rate of nearly 

60 percent until VVA, the American Legion, VetForce, and others began exposing 

the absurdity of denying verification because of minor technicalities or unmistakable 

errors by the VA itself, had at last count a denial rate hovering at roughly 27 percent. 

VVA seeks a verification process that is reasonable but not intrusive. We value 

the integrity of this program. We want to ensure that no wannabe crooks get 

verified at the expense of real disabled veterans. If there are crooks already in the 

program, they need to be identified, apprehended, prosecuted, fined, and if a judge 

determines justice demands it, be sentenced to time in prison. Now, though, crooks 

are not being caught, but legitimate veteran-owned businesses are in fact being destroyed. 

Clearing Up the ‘Backlog’ 

It is unconscionable for a claim for disability compensation to go unadjudicated 

for two years. How about if it languishes in the great maw of the VBA for four 

years? Or even longer? Far too often, claims with this profile are the rule, not the 

exception. With an ever-increasing caseload – raters handled one million-plus claims 

in 2011 – the only way the VBA will be able to deal with the volume of new claims 

and make even a dent in the burgeoning backlog is to put into play those IT pilot 

projects that have shown that they are viable. It’s time to treat the backlog as what 

it is: a crisis, and attack it at its roots. 

The VBA can start by mandating that all claims without resolution after four 

years get immediate attention if they are in the purview of the VA. If they are in 

the courts, VA managers should work with the administrative judge to place them 

at the top of the docket whenever possible. 

The VBA should do what it knows it ought to have been doing in the first place: 

triaging all new claims. Relatively simple claims ought to go through quickly, e.g., 

there is no reason why a simple claim for tinnitus cannot be fast-tracked within two 

or three months. Claims for the obvious, e.g., the traumatic amputation of a limb, 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

86 

or blindness, also could receive an initial adjudication for the major wound; associated or secondary conditions can be rated later. 

Though the VA does have a ‘‘duty to assist,’’ it should be the responsibility of the 

county or VSO service representative to deliver a substantially developed claim. If 

there are seven elements to a claim, and only four have been properly developed, 

perhaps part of the VA’s duty to assist ought to be to suggest that the claim should 

be for only the four developed parts, with a subsequent claim for the other three 

when they can be further and more fully developed. 

The manner in which VBA managers ‘‘grade’’ their raters needs to be re-examined, inasmuch as the current system puts a premium on volume, on an increase 

in speed at the cost of doing it right the first time. The result? An unacceptably high 

number of remands when unhappy veterans and their advocates appeal their denials, or the amount of their awards. What’s the answer? Training not only for new 

raters – and veterans’ benefits representatives – but for all VBA employees involved 

in the benefits side of the administration. 

And the VA can do something else: They can better define ‘‘backlog.’’ With a simple graph, or set of graphs, on their web site, that illustrate A] the total number 

of the ‘backlog’ divided into segments, e.g., claims ten years or more; five to ten 

years; three to five years; 18 months to three years; nine to 18 months; six to nine 

months; three to six months; under three months; B] the number from each of these 

categories that have been adjudicated; C] the number of cases appealed; with an explanation as to why cases are appealed. 

The Veterans Benefits Administration has managed to cultivate a reputation as 

the veterans’ adversary. Under Secretary Hickey has a long slog to at least bend 

the corporate culture she – and Secretary Shinseki – have inherited for veterans to 

feel that the VBA just might be their advocate. 

Other Priorities and Initiatives 

VVA will work to address other specific issues of concern to veterans and our families that warrant the attention of Congress and the American people. What follows 

are our most significant and, we believe, potentially achievable legislative priorities 

and policy initiatives in these areas. 

PTSD and Substance Abuse 

• VVA shall work with Congress to take whatever measures are deemed necessary to ensure accountability for the organizational capacity and funding for 

the accurate diagnoses and evidence-based treatments of the neuro-psychiatric 

wounds of war, particularly for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), substance abuse, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), and suicide risk. 

• VVA shall work with Congress to ensure that the Departments of Defense and 

Veterans Affairs develop, fund, and implement evidence-based, integrated psychosocial mental health programs, substance abuse recovery treatment programs, and suicide risk assessment programs for all veterans and their families, 

for active-duty troops and their families, and for Reservists and members of the 

National Guard who have seen service in a combat zone. 

• VVA shall work with Congress to ensure that DoD corrects all wrongful diagnoses of ‘‘personality disorder,’’ ‘‘adjustment disorder,’’ and ‘‘readjustment disorder’’ discharges of its men and women so that all veterans found to have been 

inappropriately diagnosed and discharged are correctly diagnosed and accorded 

access to the benefits and care that they deserve and to which they should be 

entitled. 

Veterans Health Care 

• VVA shall insist that VA researchers focus on studies that delve into the 

wounds, maladies, injuries, and traumas of military service and war, with specific research into the health issues unique to all U.S. military operations and 

troop deployments; and shall continue to monitor the progress of the National 

Vietnam Veterans Longitudinal Study (NVVLS) to ensure that is conducted to 

completion without any needless delay, and that it will in fact be a true longitudinal study and accounting of the physical and mental health and overall wellbeing of Vietnam veterans, according to the protocols established under Public 

Law 106–419. 

• VVA shall encourage Congress to mandate the VA to change that department’s 

overly restrictive and secretive process for adding, or not adding, pharmaceutical treatments and drugs to its prescription drug formulary and to bring 

it into line with the more transparent and expansive formulary process used by 

the Department of Defense. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

87 

• VVA shall continue to press the VA to research and implement long-term care 

and wellness options for our country’s aging veteran cohort, a need that is only 

going to increase over the next decade. 

Minority Veterans 

• VVA urges Congress to investigate if our nation’s minority veterans are given 

lesser treatment for health conditions at VA medical centers and communitybased outpatient clinics (CBOCs). 

• VVA urges Congress to mandate that the VA provide brochures and other information for Spanish-speaking veterans, particularly those residing in Puerto 

Rico, inasmuch as many male veterans are convinced to seek VA medical assistance by members of their family, who may speak Spanish exclusively. 

Agent Orange/Dioxin & Other Toxic Substances 

• VVA calls on Congress and the President to take steps to declassify all documents from the years of the Vietnam War, including memos between agencies, 

dealing with Agent Orange/dioxin and make them public – now, almost 50 years 

since our government sprayed some 20 million gallons of extraordinarily toxic 

compounds over five million acres of the former South Vietnam. 

• VVA shall continue to support legislative efforts and other initiatives to achieve 

justice for naval personnel serving aboard ships plying the waters of Yankee 

and Dixie Stations in the South China Sea and the Gulf of Tonkin by getting 

the VA to recognize that they are deserving of the same health and other benefits as in-country ‘‘boots-on-the-ground’’ veterans. 

• VVA shall continue to advocate on behalf of the veterans of the crews who flew 

C–123 transports contaminated by the remains of the barrels of Agent Orange 

they once ferried into and out of Vietnam and are now suffering some of the 

same peculiar health ills as are in-country Vietnam veterans. 

• VVA shall request that Congress investigate why the VA has ceased providing 

custodial care and/or non-medical case management service for Agent Orange 

children afflicted with spina bifida and then join us in pushing the VA to provide these vitally needed services to these now adult children – innocent victims 

of a parent’s military service. 

Women Veterans 

• VVA shall seek to ensure appropriate oversight and accountability on all VA 

medical center and VISN compliance with the performance measures defined in 

the VA’s 2012 Handbook on Women Veterans, and that this compliance be 

made a performance measure at all VISNs and VAMCs. 

• VVA shall pursue legislation to enable the VA to allow members of the National 

Guard and Reserve forces who experience military sexual trauma (MST) while 

on drilling and battle assemblies and during annual training to receive, without 

cost to them, MST-related care from VA medical facilities. 

• VVA recommends that the Under Secretary for Health review and reexamine 

the existing VHA policy pertaining to the authorization of travel for veterans 

seeking MST- related specialized inpatient and/or residential treatment programs outside the facilities where they are enrolled and provide travel funding 

for these veterans. 

• VVA will pursue legislation that would reassign the complaints of MST by a 

service member to be addressed outside her or his immediate chain of command. 

Homeless Veterans 

• VVA shall request legislation revising the VA’s Homeless Grant and Per Diem 

funding from a reimbursement for expenses, based on the previous year’s audited expenses to a prospective payment system based on a proposed budget for 

the annual program expenses, a change that is vitally needed if communitybased organizations that deliver the majority of these services are to operate 

effectively. 

• VVA shall request legislation establishing Supportive Services Assistance 

Grants for VA Homeless Grant and Per Diem Service Center Grant awardees 

and permanent authorization of the VA Homeless Grant and Per Diem Special 

Needs Grants Program. 

• VVA shall seek legislation to amend the eligibility criteria for veterans enrolled 

in the Department of Labor’s Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program 

(HVRP) so those veterans entering into ‘‘housing first’’ would be able to access 

this training for a period of up to 12 months after placement into housing. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

88 

Incarcerated Veterans 

• VVA shall continue working with Congress to ensure that veterans encountering the justice system are in fact identified as veterans, assessed for symptoms associated with PTSD and/or TBI trauma, and, where appropriate, are 

provided with alternative diversionary treatment services. 

• VVA shall continue to encourage Congress to ensure that the VA provides benefits to veterans who are temporarily confined in jail or are incarcerated in prison. 

• VVA shall also continue to work with Congress to address re-entry strategies 

and support transitional services for incarcerated veterans. 

Compensation & Pension 

• VVA shall seek legislation to secure a pension for Gold Star parents, and shall 

continue to seek the permanent prohibition of offsets of Survivors’ Benefit Plan 

(known as SBP) and Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) for the 

survivors of service members who die while still in military service. 

• Absent the permanent prohibition of these offsets, VA urges Congress to press 

the VA to develop guidelines that will allow these claims to be processed within 

30 days of a veteran’s death, while ancillary benefits due a claimant can be deferred and processed at a later date. 

• VVA urges Congress to continue to press the VA to quickly improve and implement its paperless claims processing system in all Regional Offices. 

• To promote uniformity in claims decisions, VVA shall seek a change in current 

policy which would mandate that VA staff, VSO and county veterans’ service 

representatives, and other stakeholders collaborate on developing uniform training materials, programs, and competency-based re-certification exams every 

three years for service officers. 

• VVA shall continue to ‘‘encourage’’ the VBA to direct raters to follow the ‘‘best 

practices’’ manual in determining the degree of disability and percentage of 

compensation for veterans afflicted with PTSD and other mental health disorders. 

Economic Opportunity 

• Congress needs to continue to monitor the VA’s hiring policies to ensure that 

more veterans are hired by the VA to fill key decision-making positions; hence, 

VVA advocates for a 50/50 ratio within the next 10 years. 

• VVA shall work to ensure that there are programs in effect to ensure that veterans returning from deployments overseas are accorded Veterans’ Preference 

when applying for government jobs, and are given every advantage when seeking employment in private industry or in seeking to set up their own business; 

in fact, the VA and the OPM, the Office of Personnel Management, should be 

required to recruit veterans even before they separate from the service, especially from in-demand occupations such as IT and the healing arts. 

• Congress needs to act to ensure that DoD and the VA really do work in concert 

to ensure that TAP, the Transition Assistance Program, actually assists separating and/or demobilized service members leave the military knowing most of 

their options for employment, education, and entrepreneurship, and where they 

can seek additional information; and it is imperative that DoD, the VA, the Department of Labor, and other federal agencies involve the veterans service organizations and military service organizations as integral facilitators of this transition process. 

• VVA shall work with Congress and with the DOL to significantly reform VETS, 

the Veterans Employment & Training Service program that is run by the states 

and funded through the U.S. Department of Labor, so that it actually matches 

veterans with jobs. 

• In a related matter, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance (OFCCP), and 

the Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Act (VEVRA) , which are charged with 

helping veterans get good jobs with federal contractors, must either be reformed 

wholesale or eliminated, as they are not accomplishing helping any group get 

jobs with contractors and are doing more damage than good as they manage to 

anger employers by imposing arbitrary and capricious ‘‘assessments’’ on these 

employers that are nothing but unwarranted fines. 

POW & MIA Accounting 

• VVA shall continue to press for answers regarding the 314 Americans still listed as killed in action, body not recovered, in Laos and the 54 similarly listed 

in Cambodia. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

89 

• Although Section 1082 of the 1998 Defense Authorization Act requires that the 

POW/MIA flag fly six days each year—on Armed Forces Day, Memorial Day, 

Flag Day, Independence Day, National POW/MIA Recognition Day, and Veterans Day—at specified government buildings and installations, and VVA members have been instrumental in enacting legislation that provides for the flag 

to be displayed at the state, county, and municipal level, VVA urges continued 

efforts to display this symbol of American service members still missing from 

every war in which we have taken up arms in defense of the freedoms we hold 

dear. 

The Newest Veterans 

• VVA shall continue to question the VA to ensure that they have adequate mental health personnel and services available to meet the demands of this newest 

generation of veterans, including Reservists and members of the National 

Guard, which is afflicted with mental health issues at the same or even greater 

rate as we were when we returned from ‘‘our’’ war. • VVA shall continue to promulgate and support new public and private initiatives to create jobs for returning veterans, and to ensure that such supportive 

services as mentoring programs are integral elements in these initiatives. • As VVA applauds the work of the Senate’s HELP Committee to expose the egregious excesses of those for-profit institutions of higher learning that have filled 

their own coffers at the expense of the student veterans whose trust they have 

violated, VVA shall continue to work with members of Congress, the Administration, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and any other entity that 

will expose the greed and shame of these institutions. 

Finally, VVA shall press the appropriate federal agencies as well as Congress to 

initiate and complete adjustments to the ‘‘In Memory Plaque’’ at The Wall here on 

the Mall in Washington, D.C., to include elevating and canting the stone tablet for 

easier reading; adding lighting for nocturnal viewing; and installing a brass plate 

that explains the meaning and history of the plaque, which acknowledges those who 

have perished in the years after the Vietnam War from causes related to their participation in the war. 

Again, on behalf of our membership, we thank you for the opportunity to present 

VVA’s legislative agenda and policy initiatives for the 113th Congress, and we thank 

all of you for the work you are doing on behalf of our veterans and our families. 

f 

Prepared Statement of Rear Admiral W. Clyde Marsh, USN Retired 

INTRODUCTION 

Mr. Chairman and distinguished members of the committee, my name is Clyde 

Marsh, Director of the Alabama Department of Veterans Affairs and President of 

the National Association of State Directors of Veterans Affairs (NASDVA). I am 

honored to present the views of the State Directors of Veterans Affairs for all fifty 

states, the District of Columbia, and five territories: American Samoa, Guam, 

Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Here with me today 

are Les Beavers – Kentucky, past NASDVA President, and State Directors, Randy 

Reeves - Mississippi, Many-Bears Grinder – Tennessee, Lonnie Wangen – North Dakota and Matthew Cary - District of Columbia. 

Nationally, we are the second largest provider of services to veterans and our 

roles continue to grow. Collectively, states contribute more than $6 billion each year 

in support of our nation’s veterans and their families even in the face of constrained 

budgets. Our duties include honoring and working with all veterans and their family members and the various veterans’ organizations both within our states and nationally. 

We applaud the sea change at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (USDVA) 

in recognizing the importance of State Departments of Veterans Affairs (SDVA) and 

we have a formal ‘‘partnership’’ with USDVA through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Secretary Shinseki signed in February 2012. The MOU 

pledges the two organizations to maintain effective communications, an exchange of 

ideas and information, identification of emerging requirements, and continuous reevaluation of existing veterans’ programs to meet today’s needs. 

As governmental agencies, State Departments of Veterans Affairs are tasked by 

our respective Governors, State Boards and/or Commissions with the responsibility 

to address the needs of our veterans irrespective of age, gender, era of service, military branch or circumstance of service. On a daily basis, State Directors and their 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

90 

staffs are confronted with unique situations in caring for all veterans and their families, which often needs to be addressed in an urgent manner. Delivery of meaningful services and support is often best coordinated at the local level. Collectively our 

state offices provide coverage for veterans throughout the country, District of Columbia and the territories. 

FUNDING FOR VA 

NASDVA appreciates the efforts of the Administration and Congress to improve 

overall funding for health care, cemetery operations, homeless veterans programs, 

community clinics, and claims processing. We are serving a new generation of veterans from a decade of war who must receive medical care, establishment of benefits 

and needed assistance transitioning to civilian life after their dedicated service. We 

support the $140B budget proposal for the Department of Veterans Affairs for 

FY2014, which includes $64B in discretionary funds, mostly for medical care, and 

$76B for mandatory funds, mostly for disability compensation and pensions. 

The full funding by Congress will provide the resources to deliver services for the 

surge of newly discharged veterans as a result of troop reductions and continue to 

address VA’s continued three major areas of emphasis: overall access to VA where 

VA should be the provider of choice for veterans; eliminate the backlog in claims 

processing; and the stated goal by Secretary Shinseki of eliminating homelessness 

among veterans. Another ongoing challenge is to meet the critical demand for mental health services which needs continued funding and focus, particularly in light 

of the Traumatic Brian Injury (TBI) and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) injuries from Iraq and Afghanistan. Likewise, there should be increased funding to 

veterans’ healthcare in rural areas and employment opportunities for returning veterans. 

OUTREACH AND TRANSITION 

NASDVA strongly supports continued efforts to reach out to veterans. We believe 

all veterans, regardless of where they reside, should have equal access to federal 

and state benefits and services and that federal and state governments must collaborate to achieve this goal nationally. Many areas of the country are still underserved due to veterans’ lack of information and awareness of their benefits. This directly impacts their access to VA services. The USDVA and SDVA must continue 

to work together to reduce this inequity by reaching out to veterans regarding their 

earned benefits. NASDVA urges implementation of a grant program that would 

allow VA to partner with the states to perform outreach at the local level. 

Comprehensive databases that have retrievable data elements from the service 

members’ records can provide the capability to target specific segments of the veteran population. This capability would allow for outreach to meet different categories of veterans e.g. war era, geographic exposure, etc. and also to connect with 

veterans with special needs, illnesses, and disabilities e.g. Agent Orange, burn pit 

exposure, and radiation. We need funding to create pilot programs for development 

of such detailed state databases. 

We commend VA for their commitment to improve responsive and efficient delivery of benefits and services to returning Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans. 

They are the benefactors of better awareness of available benefits for themselves 

and their families and the improved process for receiving them. We agree that DoD 

should be responsible for the physical examination for fitness to serve and VA 

should be responsible for determining the disability rating. Likewise, steps should 

be taken to make disability processing less confusing, eliminate payment inequities, 

and provide a foundation with appropriate incentives for injured veterans to return 

to a productive life. 

The joint DoD/VA Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) pilot should be 

further expanded. We support the efforts of Congress to have medical advocates to 

help wounded warriors mitigate the confusing array of paperwork and procedures. 

SDVA support the collaborative efforts being taken among federal agencies to improve the timeliness, ease of application, and delivery of services and benefits, and 

strongly encourage the VA and DoD to use the states to assist them in these efforts. 

DoD should develop a formal program that would provide SDVA with the names of 

returning service members in order for states to connect veterans to all federal and 

state benefits and services. 

NASDVA supports the recommendations of the Veterans Disability Benefits Commission to streamline the delivery of disability benefits by updating the VA Rating 

Schedule, realigning the DoD/VA process for rating disabilities, and developing and 

implementing new criteria specific to rating Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

91 

State Directors have clearly witnessed how employment is essential to a successful transition from uniformed service to civilian status. Future legislation must preserve the Veterans Employment and Training Service (VETS) state grants program. 

The states need the flexibility to determine how best to integrate the Disabled Veteran Outreach Program Specialists/Local Veterans Employment Representatives 

(DVOP/LVER) into their state employment service delivery systems. The move of 

the VETS program in Texas to the Texas Veterans Commission has been highly successful and serves as a good example. We believe DVOP/LVER personnel are being 

under-utilized in their ability to assist veterans and we recommend Congress and 

DOL allow DVOP/LVER staff to work with the SDVA offices to offer veterans benefit information in addition to the employment and training duties. We strongly believe that LVERs and DVOPs should not only provide employment and reemployment assistance and also make appropriate referrals for veterans to receive benefits 

counseling, education and healthcare information. 

We commend the Administration’s renewed emphasis on hiring veterans for federal employment and both DoL and DoD need to continue to promote awareness of 

the provisions and benefits under the Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act (USERRA). 

VETERANS HEALTHCARE BENEFITS AND SERVICES 

State Directors actively support increasing veterans’ access to VA Healthcare. 

This involves being engaged with the VA Medical Centers on establishing and locating additional Community-Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOC) including Tribal Reservations with mental health services, expansion of Vet Centers, the deployment of 

mobile health clinics, and the use of tele-health services where appropriate. We applaud the efforts by VA to address the particular issue of healthcare for women veterans, military sexual trauma, and veterans residing in rural areas. Future 

healthcare funding is crucial to expand outreach and access to include tele-health, 

tele-home health and tele-medicine. Likewise, we support VA contracting out some 

specialty care to private sector facilities where access for the veteran is difficult. 

VA Research and Development needs to focus on enhancing the long-term health 

and well-being of the veteran population particularly the conditions such as Gulf 

War Syndrome, PTSD, and the effects of TBI. Attention must still be given to the 

continued funding support of the large capital projects identified in VA’s Strategic 

Capital Investment Plan (SCIP) while maintaining and addressing the backlog in 

O&M needs in VHA’s large and aging infrastructure. 

We support initiatives to ensure that all of our wounded warriors who suffer from 

TBI and PTSD have access to the most advanced and current treatment options 

available regardless of their military status. There should be expanded screening for 

PTSD among all combat veterans. We share the concern about the mental health 

of service personnel, especially the number of suicides and long-term effects of 

PTSD. We appreciate the proactive steps such as the suicide hotline and addressing 

the underlying causes for suicide; however, more still needs to be done since the suicide rates are high and exceed even current combat causalities. 

NASDVA recommends an in-depth examination of long-term care and mental 

health services to include gap analysis clearly identifying where services are lacking. Any study should include consultation with SDVA. 

STATE VETERANS HOMES 

The State Home Grant and Per Diem Program is the largest and most important 

partnership between the SDVA and USDVA. State Veterans Homes (SVH) are a 

critical component of long-term healthcare for veterans and a model of cost-efficient 

partnership between federal and state governments. SVH are the largest provider 

of long-term care to America’s veterans providing a vital service to elderly and disabled veterans with skilled nursing, domiciliary, and adult-day health care services. 

There are 145 operational state veterans’ homes in 50 states and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. In fact, state homes now provide 52 percent of all VA authorized long-term care with over 31,000 beds. World War II, Korean War and now the 

Vietnam veterans are rapidly aging out. With over 1.4 million veterans now over 

the age of 85, this partnership is critical in meeting the individual veterans’ needs 

for nursing care. 

NASDVA and the National Association of State Veteran Homes (NASVH) have actively advocated for the principle that veterans in our homes are entitled to the 

same level of support from VA as veterans placed in VA community contract nursing homes. SVH’s sole focus is on veterans and providing them high quality of care, 

which makes it the best choice and most cost effective. Both national associations 

have been engaged with Congress to demonstrate program needs and level of fundVACREP180 with DISTILLER

92 

ing support. We have maintained that the benefit is to the veteran, regardless of 

where they choose to receive their care. 

NASDVA and its members sincerely appreciate the support and close coordination 

of Congress and specifically, the Veterans Affairs Committees and staff, in the successful implementation (in less than 180 days) of PL 112–154 (State Veterans Home 

Per Diem for 70% and S/C Veterans) and the resultant Interim Final Rule, RIN 

2900–A057, that took effect on February 2, 2013. The coordination and cooperation 

on this issue between Congress, NASDVA and USDVA will benefit our veterans for 

many years to come. As the Final Rule process goes forward, there is still work to 

be done. We ask your continued support in ensuring that veterans do not forfeit 

(under the final rule) any eligibility for VA benefits and programs for services, prosthetic devices and specialty care that are not routinely provided at the Nursing 

Home Care level. Additionally, we have addressed (through the comment process 

with USDVA) the issues of reimbursement for extraordinarily high drug costs and 

clarification of circumstances for reimbursement of physicians’ services for 70% program veterans in our State Veterans Nursing Homes. Your continued support in 

this process is key to the program’s continued success and the future care of our 

veterans. 

Congress should appropriate sufficient funding to keep the existing backlog of 

projects in the State Extended Care Facilities Construction Grant Program at a 

manageable level to assure life safety upgrades and new construction. In order to 

keep the priority group 1 list of 74 projects ($257M) from growing to further unacceptable levels, sufficient funding is essential for the SVH Construction Grant and 

Per Diem Program of at least $100M in lieu of the $85M requested. 

VETERANS BENEFITS SERVICES 

NASDVA recommends a greater role for SDVA in the overall effort to manage and 

administer claims processing, regardless of whether the state uses state employees, 

nationally chartered veterans service organizations (VSO) and/or county veterans 

service officers (CVSO). Collectively, we have the capacity and capability to assist 

the Veterans Benefit Administration (VBA). Additionally, a collaborative effort 

should take place on the establishment of standards for training, testing, and accrediting the CVSO to include continuing education and performance standards. We 

can support VA in their ‘‘duty to assist’’ without diminishing our role as the veterans’ advocate. 

Access to VBA data systems and uniform paperless claims software would enhance service officer integration in the delivery of benefits services to veterans. 

NASDVA applauds and strongly supports VBA’s development of the electronic 

claims processing system (VBMS) and its current deployment at 20 stations and for 

all 56 stations by end of 2013. This major program will directly address the concerns 

for the claims backlog. NASDVA fully supports VBA’s transformation plan to address the claims backlog in a systemic way and for the long term. Using a digitsto-digits approach will further the paperless process capabilities of VA by creating 

a data exchange for claims assimilation directly from State Service Officers, VSOs 

and VA. This will allow claims with supporting documents to be submitted digitally, 

enabling the claim to be automatically established and available to be worked. 

Several states have already developed their own paperless claims processing systems. In an effort to support VBA’s design, NASDVA has formed an IT Task Force 

of five states (VA, CA, KY, SD, and UT) to work directly with VBA on integration 

of state systems with VBMS. 

Each state strives to fulfill the mission of identifying and connecting veterans to 

their benefits. Several states are developing a claims management database for 

their veteran population, which includes a scanned image of the DD 214s. 

We continue to be concerned that the census does not count veterans or disabled 

veterans other than through the Americas Community Survey, which only samples 

ten percent of the population and is not a hard count. We urge the Congress to mandate counting of veterans in the next census. 

Nineteen SDVAs have direct responsibility of the State Approving Agency (SAA) 

program. In 2006, the SAAs secured a mandatory funding model to ensure their programs would have sufficient funding each year. With the important passage of the 

Post-9/11 GI Bill, the SAAs’ mission expanded with more compliance requirements 

but no additional resources. Without adequate resources, SAAs report that it is 

harder to sufficiently monitor and assess all academic programs under their purview. The SAAs are one of the only ways USDVA can make an informed decision 

on approval and disapproval of academic programs for the G.I. Bill. NASDVA recommends the funding structure commensurate with SAA’s responsibility be reviewed. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

93 

State Directors have been receiving strong opposition to the order of precedence 

for the new Distinguished Warfare Medal established by DoD. We are in agreement 

with the Veterans Service Organizations in support of the medal but that it should 

not be above the Bronze Star and/or Purple Heart. 

BURIAL AND MEMORIAL BENEFITS 

The State Cemetery Grant Program is a complementary and integral part of National Cemetery Administration’s (NCA) ability to provide burial services for veterans and their eligible family members, especially those living in rural areas. 

State, territory and tribal cemeteries expand burial access and support the NCA 

goal of providing burials to 94% of all veterans in a 75-mile radius by the end of 

2013. There are currently 88 cemeteries located in 43 states and territories including tribal trust lands, Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam. This level of commitment will provide for over 31,000 interments in FY2013. We recommend that in the FY2014 budget proposal of $46M for the grant pro- gram be increased to at least $50M. This modest increase would help address the 

95 grant applications that have been submitted for funding. Of the 95 applications, 

there are 70 projects where the states and the Pine Ridge Sioux tribal government 

have certified as meeting the matching architectural and engineering (A&E) funds, 

which will be reimbursed following grant award. They have already borne the costs 

associated with the acquisition of suitable land, which is not reimbursable. The current estimated value of the 70 projects is approximately $162.3M. The second tier 

of 25 applications, without matching A&E funds, brings the estimated total of all 

pending applications to $276.5M. The $50M would allow for timely progression and orderly development without 

creating a backlog of projects. With a lack of sufficient funding, even though a small 

increase over the budget submission will result in denying some veterans and eligible family members a final resting place and lasting memorial to commemorate 

their service to our nation. 

NASDVA appreciates the legislation that increased the plot allowance to $700 

with subsequent adjustments based on the CPI. The plot allowance assists states 

to offset operational costs and achieve a high level of professional burial service as 

well as to gain and maintain standards of appearance commensurate with NCA National Shrine status. 

NASDVA supports the rural initiative by NCA for National Veteran Burial 

Grounds. It will allow NCA to reach underserved veterans in rural areas where the 

veteran population is less than 25,000 within a 75-mile radius service area. Rural 

lots do not qualify for a national cemetery and the construction of a state cemetery 

is not likely. Initially, the VA plan will establish a national cemetery presence within public or private cemeteries in eight states: Idaho, Maine, Montana, Nevada, 

North Dakota, Utah, Wisconsin and Wyoming. NCA estimates an additional 136,000 

veterans will have access to a burial option. NASDVA recommends that further 

analysis be conducted to determine if other states or territories could be affected by 

this new policy. 

Overall, NASDVA applauds NCA for their consistent high customer satisfaction 

ratings for the appearance of national cemeteries and the quality of service. And 

most importantly, NASDVA appreciates their collaborative partnership with states, 

territories and tribal governments. 

HOMELESSNESS AMONG VETERANS 

NASDVA applauds the policy by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for ending 

homelessness among veterans. States will continue to develop and support outreach 

programs that assist VA in this high priority effort, particularly in identifying those 

veterans that are homeless and programs to prevent homelessness. As partners with 

USDVA, we are focusing on addressing the multiple causes of veterans’ homelessness e.g. medical issues (mental and physical), legal issues, limited job skills, and 

work history. We appreciate the increased funding for specialized homeless programs such as Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem, Health Care for Homeless 

Veterans, Domiciliary Care for Homeless Veterans, and Compensated Work Therapy. It is vital to continue VA’s partnership with community organizations to provide transitional housing and the VA/HUD partnership with public housing authorities to provide permanent housing for veterans and their families. 

We know that many stages of homelessness exist and likewise we know that 

many factors contribute to our nation’s homelessness among veterans. Contributing 

factors are alcohol- drug abuse, mental health issues, PTSD, lack of jobs as well as 

the courts and corrections system. To eliminate chronic homelessness we must surround the problem and address the many root causes by providing the necessary 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

94 

mental health and drug treatment programs to include jobs and employment training. These collective programs must be adequately staffed and fully funded in the 

current and future budget. Another revolving door that appears to increase the rolls 

of homelessness among veterans is the burdened courts and corrections system. 

VETERANS TREATMENT COURTS 

The States recognize an increase in justice-involved veterans, especially in the 

time shortly after discharge. Veterans are returning to a civilian world where unemployment is on the rise, financial institutions are failing, and families are torn 

apart. After discharge, many veterans suffer from severe mental and emotional 

problems that result in behaviors that are disruptive and often criminal in nature. 

To care for these veterans in a very specific way, States are establishing Veterans 

Treatment Courts (VTCs) to offer these veterans an opportunity at a second chance, 

as well as appropriate treatment and accountability. 

VTCs are specialty courts that provide diversionary programs for veterans who 

find themselves justice involved. In addition to the pretrial diversionary methods offered, veterans are also evaluated for Federal VA benefits to include substance 

abuse treatment and mental health wellness. This aspect cuts costs for local jurisdictions that traditionally are required to pay for this expensive, specialized care. 

The accountability element given by mentoring veterans makes the VTC a unique, 

successful program that rehabilitates veterans to the civilian world. 

Currently, the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), in conjunction with the National Drug Court Institute (NDCI), offers orientation and training to jurisdictions 

interested in establishing VTCs. States can apply for these training opportunities 

through the veterans Treatment Court Planning Initiative (VTCPI), which sends 

groups to key VTCs to observe and learn. These training grants are limited and only 

a few groups can attend every year. The States respectfully request support for increased funding to the BJA so more jurisdictions can participate. Additionally, increased funding for multi-year grants to aid jurisdictions in the establishment and 

sustainment of VTCs is needed. More VTCs means more direct help for veterans. 

CONCLUSION 

Mr. Chairman and distinguished members of the VA committees, we respect the 

important work that you are doing to improve support to veterans who answered 

the call to serve our great country. State Directors of Veterans Affairs remain dedicated to doing our part, but we urge you to remember the increasing financial challenge that states face, just as you address the fiscal challenges at the national level. 

I would like to emphasize again, that we are ‘‘partners’’ with federal VA in the delivery of services and care to our nation’s patriots. State Directors are veterans’ advocates and perform as congressional emissaries that help veterans receive support 

and essential benefits they have earned through their honorable service. 

Thank you for including NASDVA in these very important hearings. 

f 

Prepared Statement of MG Gus Hargett 

As President of the National Guard Association of the United States, I thank you 

for the honor of appearing before you today and for all that you are doing for our 

veterans 

Background - Unique Citizen Service Member/Veteran 

The National Guard is unique among components of the Department of Defense 

in that it has the dual state and federal mission. While serving operationally on 

Title 10 active duty status in Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom , National Guard units are under the command and control of the President. 

However, upon release from active duty, members of the National Guard return to 

their states as both veterans and serving members of the Reserve Component but 

under the command and control of their governors. As members of a special branch 

of the Selected Reserves they train not just for their federal missions but for their 

potential state active duty missions such as fire fighting, flood control and assistance to civil authorities in a variety of possible disaster scenarios. 

While serving in their states, members are scattered geographically with their 

families as they hold jobs, own businesses, or pursue academic programs and participate actively in their communities. Against this backdrop, members of the National Guard remain ready to uproot from their families and civilian lives to serve 

their governor domestically or their President in distance parts of the globe as duty 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

95 

calls and to return to reintegrate within the same communities when their missions 

are accomplished. 

Military service in the National Guard is uniquely community based. But the culture of the National Guard remains little understood outside of its own circles. 

When the Department of Defense testifies before Congress stating its programmatic 

needs, it will likely recognize the indispensable role of the National Guard as a vital 

Operational Force in the Global War on Terror but it will say little about and seek 

less to redress the benefit disparities, training challenges and unmet medical readiness issues for National Guard members and their families. We continue to ask that 

these disparities be given a fresh look with the best interests of the National Guard 

members and their families in mind. 

NGAUS in concert with The Military Coalition has long sought legislation authorizing veteran status under Title 38 for National Guard and Reserve members of the 

Armed Forces who are entitled to a non-regular retirement under Chapter 1223 of 

10 USC but were never called to title10 active service other than for training purposes during their careers – through no fault of their own. 

Many members of Congress may not know that a reservist can complete a full 

Guard or Reserve career but not earn the title of ‘‘Veteran of the Armed Forces of 

the United States,’’ unless the member has served on Title 10 active duty for other 

than training purposes. 

Drill training, annual training, and title 32 service responding to domestic natural 

disasters and defending our nation’s airspace, borders and coastlines do not qualify 

for veteran status. 

Reserve- component members who served 20 years gave the government a blank 

check to send them anywhere in the world but through no fault of their own were 

never deployed or in some cases even allowed to be deployed. 

Yet, an active-duty member whose entire short- term enlistment tour is spent in 

less rigorous domestic assignments to domestic posts and bases on Title 10 status 

will fully qualify, not just for veterans status, but for all veterans’ benefits. This disparity is unfair and must end. 

H.R. 679 would not bestow any benefits other than the honor of claiming veteran 

status for those who honorably served and sacrificed as career reserve component 

members but were never ordered to Title 10 active service. They deserve nothing 

less than this recognition. Authorizing veteran status for career RC service would 

substantially boost the morale of the RC without a cost consequence. 

Opposition to this bill in the past has been grounded in a myth that passage 

would open the floodgates of new veteran benefits for this group. That is just not 

the case or even allowable under the law. H.R. 679 explicitly guards against this 

possibility. Moreover, ‘‘pay go’’ laws in effect bar the default triggering of any new 

entitlements. It is time to move past the unfounded ‘‘camel’s nose under the tent’’ 

fear that has held back this legislation. 

Correct a disproportionate denial rate for Reserve Component claims for 

disability benefit compensation by providing National Guard and Reserve 

veterans of the Global War on Terror with a presumption of service connection for certain injuries 

According to Veterans Administration statistics published in May 2012, it is denying adjudicated disability benefit compensation claims for Reserve Component (RC) 

Global War on Terror at four times the rate of active duty GWOT veterans according to a published VA May 2012 report. 

Years of neglect in the Office of the Secretary of Defense with the demobilization 

process for RC members returning home from GWOT deployment and the inadequate capturing of theater medical records for the RC have come home to roost. 

Area theater commands in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring 

Freedom did not establish a reliable method for preserving in -theater records of the 

RC. Congress heard testimony during the peak years of OIF in 2007 that some 

medically evacuated RC members sometimes returned stateside with medical 

records resting on their supine chests. 

Moreover, too many members of the Guard and Reserve have been allowed to slip 

through the medical cracks at demobilization stations resulting in widespread under 

identification of service connected injuries at that critical separation point. 

A variety of reasons were at play to include inadequate screening by medical personnel at the demobilization site; the reluctance of returning members to report disabling injuries at distant demobilization sites to avoid the risk of further separations from home after lengthy deployments; or simply the late onset of symptoms 

after discharge from exposures to chemical hazards, traumatic brain injury or post 

traumatic stress disorder. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

96 

The six most frequent injuries for which the VA awards disability benefit compensation are tinnitus; back or cervical strain; PTSD; leg flexion limitations; degenerative spinal arthritis; of the spine; and migraine. Service connection presumptions 

for these injuries presented for RC GWOT veterans would mitigate the inequity. 

The issues of veterans’ unemployment and mental health maintenance cannot be 

separated. Before veterans can maintain gainful employment in a challenging job 

environment, they must be able to maintain a healthy mental status and establish 

supportive social networks. 

In 2007, the Rand Corporation published a study titled, ‘‘The Invisible wounds of 

War.’’ It found that at the time 300,000 veterans of Operation Iraqi Freedom and 

Operation Enduring Freedom suffered from either PTSD or major depression. This 

number can only have grown after five more years of war. The harmful effects of 

these untreated invisible wounds on our veterans hinder their ability to reintegrate 

with their families and communities, work productively, and to live independently 

and peacefully. 

Rand recommended that a network of local, state, and federal resources centered 

at the community level be available to deliver evidence-based care to veterans whenever and wherever they are located. Veterans must have the ability to utilize 

trained and certified services in their communities. In addition to training providers, the VA must educate veterans and their families on how to recognize the 

signs of behavioral illness and how and where to obtain treatment. 

VA and Vet Center facilities are often located hundreds of miles from our National Guard veterans living in rural areas. Requiring a veteran, once employed, to 

drive hundreds of miles to obtain care at a VA facility necessitates the veteran taking time off from work for reasons likely difficult to explain to an employer. The 

VA needs to leverage community resources to proactively engage veterans in caring 

for their mental health needs in a confidential and convenient manner that does not 

require long distance travel or delayed appointments. 

To facilitate the leveraging of mental health care providers in our communities, 

the VA can actively exercise its authority to contract with private entities in local 

communities, or creatively implement a voucher program that would allow our veterans to seek fee-based treatment locally outside the brick and mortar of the veterans Administration facilities and even Vet Centers. 

The Vet Center in Spokane for example serves an area as big as the state of 

Pennsylvania. It is not practical for veterans in this catchment area to drive hundreds of miles to seek counseling or behavioral clinical care. That Vet Center pre 

-screens fee- based providers to whom it will refer veterans for confidential treatment in its management area. It also monitors the process to make sure the veteran 

is actually receiving care paid for by the Vet Center. This system already works. 

However, a voucher process would improve efficiencies by relieving the Vet Center 

of its scheduling burden by allowing the veteran to directly make his or her own 

appointment with providers as needed. 

The VA and Vet Centers also need to fully leverage existing state administrative 

mental health and veteran networks. Working with the state mental health care 

provider licensing authorities, community providers certified by the VA or Vet Center to treat veterans could be identified at the state agency level with vouchers to 

pay for treatment. 

Several of our veterans have fallen through the cracks of the VA health care system, and will continue to do so. According to the Vietnam Veterans of America, last 

year only 30% of our veteran population had enrolled in VA medical programs. 

Many veterans end up in the care of state social service programs in cooperation 

with state and national veteran organizations. The VA has the authority to assist 

in maintaining this safety net of care for veterans in a stressful economic climate 

for our states with a voucher program or expanded contracting with private entities. 

It needs to act. 

We must proactively address an unemployment rate in excess of 20 % for serving 

members of the National Guard and Reserve. Anecdotally, we continue to hear that 

employers will find subtle ways to avoid hiring a serving member of the Guard or 

Reserve in order to avoid disruptions to the workplace from deployment related absences. Although technically be a violation of the Uniformed Services Employment 

and Reemployment Rights , it is impossible to prove in most cases. 

Although the unemployment rate for returning veterans is lower than the national average, the National Guard Bureau late in 2012 has reported the unemployment rate for the Army National Guard to be greater than 20 %- much higher than 

the national average of 7.8 percent reported at the end of 2012. 

California reports that no CA National Guard company or brigade returning from 

deployment during the last three years has had an unemployment rate less than 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

97 

fifty percent (50%).Some units returning from deployment in 2012 reported their unemployment rate to be in excess of 60 %. 

Although USERRA prohibits hiring discrimination against members of the Reserve Components by reason of their ongoing military service, acts of discrimination 

when they occur are often impossible to prove. 

When an employer has a choice of hiring a veteran no longer serving in the Select 

Reserve or a veteran or non veteran still serving in the Guard or Reserve, the employer would most likely hire the non serving veteran to remove the risk of a deployment that can disrupt the workplace. 

Members of the National Guard and Reserve should not face discrimination in the 

hiring process particularly from federal government employers. Currently veterans 

receive hiring preference points from federal agencies. Because National Guard 

members are in a much worse employment fix that is likely to continue, federal 

agencies need to help address this by awarding separate preference points to serving 

members of the National Guard and Reserve. 

Thank you again for the honor of appearing before you today and for what you 

are doing for our National Guard veterans who are still serving and for those who 

have separated. They have benefited greatly from your efforts. Thank you. 

f 

Materials Submitted For The Record 

Anthony A. Wallis, Legislative Director/Director of Government Affairs, Association of the United States Navy 

The Association of the United States Navy 

The Association of the United States Navy (AUSN) continues its mission as the 

premier advocate for our nation’s Sailors and Veterans alike. Formerly known as 

the Naval Reserve Association, which traces its roots back to 1954, AUSN was established on 19 May 2009 to expand its focus on the entire Navy. AUSN works for 

not only our members, but the Navy and Veteran community overall by promoting 

the Department of the Navy’s interests, encouraging professional development of officers and enlisted and educating the public and political bodies regarding the Nation’s welfare and security. 

AUSN prides itself on personal career assistance to its members and successful 

legislative activity on Capitol Hill regarding equipment and personnel issues. The 

Association actively represents its members by participating in the most distinguished groups protecting the rights of military personnel. AUSN is a member of 

The Military Coalition (TMC), a group of 34 associations with a strong history of 

advocating for the rights and benefits of military personnel, active and retired. 

AUSN is also a member of the National Military Veterans Alliance (NMVA) and an 

associate member of the Veterans Day National Committee of the Department of 

Veterans’ Affairs (VA). 

The Association’s members include Active Duty, Reserve and Veterans from all 

fifty states, U.S. Territories, Europe and Asia. AUSN has 81 chapters across the 

country. Of our over 22,000 members, approximately 80% are Veterans. Our National Headquarters is located at 1619 King Street, Alexandria Virginia and we can 

be reached at 703–548–5800. 

Contact Information: 

National President: DKCM Charles Bradley, U.S. Navy (Ret.), 

charles.bradley@ausn.org 

Executive Director: RADM Casey Coane, U.S. Navy (Ret.), casey.coane@ausn.org 

Legislative Director: Mr. Anthony Wallis, anthony.wallis@ausn.org 

Summary 

Chairmen, Ranking Members and Members of the House and Senate Veterans’ 

Affairs Committee, the Association of the United States Navy (AUSN) thanks you 

and your Committee for the work that you do in support of our Navy, retirees and 

veterans as well as their families. Your hard work has allowed significant progress 

in creating legislation that has left a positive impact on our military community. 

Last year, in 2012 alone, AUSN was pleased to see passage and implementation 

of legislation in the areas of Employment, Transition/Reintegration, Concurrent Receipt, Healthcare and Education. Bills such as H.R. 4155, the Veteran Skills to Jobs 

Act, H.R. 1627, the Honoring Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act, 

H.R. 4114, the Veterans Compensation Cost-of-Living-Adjustment (COLA) Act, H.R. 

4057, the Improving Transparency of Education Opportunities for Veterans Act, and 

S. 322, the Dignified Burial of Veterans Act. These bills, and others that passed into 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

98 

law last year, show the commitment and determination of Members of this Committee as well as Congress to improving the lives of those who have served our 

country. 

As part of a larger Veteran community, AUSN recognizes the many challenges 

ahead, especially with the upcoming release of the President’s Fiscal Year 2014 

(FY14) Budget Request. Though some changes must be made in these fiscal times, 

we must consider what is fair to our Veterans given the promises that were made 

to them when they pledged to serve their communities and their country. Of great 

concern amongst our membership and Veterans are the impacts of an additional 

Continuing Resolution (CR) for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2013 (FY13) and what 

the implementation of the sequester will have upon the military and Veteran community. Although AUSN was pleased that military personnel and programs administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) are largely exempt from sequestration, based off of last year’s decision by the Administration, there is uncertainty 

as to other impacts the sequester may have upon current and former military 

servicemembers and beneficiaries, most notably effects to the current Defense 

Health Program (DHP), U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, Department of 

Labor (DOL)- Veterans Employment and Training funding and the Federal jobs that 

will be lost, affecting Veterans, for example, which constitute a large portion of the 

Federal work force. AUSN is pleased to see discussions underway to address concern for the impact of sequestration and what effect it might or might not have on 

the VA. In regards to the CR, AUSN is greatly concerned with the heavy cuts that 

are already being implemented in the VA’s budget this fiscal year from the current 

CR and what the impact would be for a second CR on crucial programs to our Veteran community. 

The Association of the United States Navy, working with its members, Veterans 

and alongside other Veteran Service Organizations (VSO’s), The Military Coalition 

(TMC) and other partner associations, has devised its Legislative Objectives/ Priorities as described below that we would like both the House and Senate Veterans’ 

Affairs Committees to consider. 

Veterans’ Healthcare 

AUSN was pleased to see that all VA programs were exempt from sequestration 

and that vital healthcare needs of our Veterans are going to continue to be provided. 

In addition, AUSN was encouraged to see in Section 723 of the Fiscal Year 2013 

(FY13) National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), that the Secretary of Defense 

and Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ‘‘shall jointly enter into a understanding providing for the sharing of the results of examinations and other records on members 

of the Armed Forces that are retained and maintained with respect to the medical 

tracking system for members deployed overseas.’’ This measure seeks to increase the 

sharing of medical records and information between the two agencies. AUSN supports the increased and improved communication between DOD and the VA, as our 

overseas contingency operations draw-down and a new generation of Veterans will 

need to be taken care of. Studies have shown that since October 2001, approximately 1.6 million U.S. troops have been deployed for Operation Enduring Freedom 

(OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Early evidence suggests that many returning service members may be suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder 

(PTSD) and depression. Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is also a major concern. The 

sharing of vital healthcare and mental health documents between the two agencies 

will ensure continuity of care to our servicemembers and Veterans during the forthcoming draw-downs. 

Agent Orange 

The Veterans’ Affairs Committee has a longstanding working relationship with 

veterans and the effects of Agent Orange on the health of Vietnam Veterans. Once 

classified in the early 1980’s as a, ‘‘minor acne condition,’’ Agent Orange has been 

thoroughly studied, and it has been determined that its exposure to our 

servicemembers has caused severe illnesses such as various forms of cancer, Parkinson’s Disease, Lymphoma and many others. During the Vietnam War, the United 

States military sprayed more than 19 million gallons of various ‘‘rainbow’’ herbicide 

combinations, but Agent Orange was used most often. The name ‘‘Agent Orange’’ 

came from the orange identifying stripe used on the 55-gallon drums in which it 

was stored from 1962 to 1971, used to remove trees and dense tropical foliage that 

provided enemy cover. Often times, U.S. Navy and Coast Guard vessels were in the 

vicinity of disbursement of these chemicals. 

The Navy and Marine Corps Manual (SECNAVINST 1650.1H) defines the area 

in which a ship must have operated during this time period as follows; ‘‘water areas 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

99 

from a point on the east coast of Vietnam at the border of Vietnam with China 

southeastward to 21N, 108–15E, thence southward to 18N, 108–15E; thence southeastward to 1–30N, 111E; thence southward to 11N, 111E; thence southwestward 

to 7N, 105E; thence westward to 7N, 103E; thence northward to 9–30N, 103E; 

thence northeastward to 10–15N, 104–27E; thence northward to a point on the west 

coast of Vietnam at the border of Vietnam with Cambodia.’’ Veterans, who served 

aboard U.S. Navy and Coast Guard ships operating on the waters of Vietnam between 9 January 1962, and 7 May 1975, may be eligible to receive VA disability 

compensation for 14 medical conditions associated with presumptive exposure to 

Agent Orange. 

With the passage of the Agent Orange Act of 1991, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs was issued the power to declare certain illnesses ‘‘presumptive’’ to exposure to 

Agent Orange, enabling Vietnam Veterans to receive disability compensation for 

their related conditions. However, a declaration by the VA in 2002 limited the scope 

of the Act to only those veterans who could provide proof that they served in land, 

including troops on the ground and riverine Naval personnel. As such, Blue Water 

Navy Veterans serving off the coast must file individual VA claims to restore their 

benefits. However by 2009, over 32,880 such claims were denied. 

AUSN was pleased, in 2011, when the VA released an updated list of U.S. Navy 

and Coast Guard ships that were confirmed to have operated on Vietnam’s inland 

waterways, docked on shore, or had crewmembers sent ashore. This list, which can 

be found on the VA’s website at http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/ 

agentorange/shiplist/index.asp, can assist Vietnam Veterans in determining potential eligibility for compensation benefits. However, on 26 December 2012, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, General Eric Shinseki, announced that findings from an 

Institute of Medicine (IOM) report determined that the evidence currently available 

does not support the establishment of presumption of exposure to herbicides for 

Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans. The report, titled, ‘‘Blue Water Navy Vietnam 

Veterans and Agent Orange Exposure,’’ was a culmination of extensive research 

that included interviews with Vietnam Navy Veterans, as well as examinations of 

peer-reviewed literature, exposure and transport modeling, ship deck logs and other 

governmental documents, found that, at this time, there is insufficient evidence to 

determine whether Blue Water Navy Veterans were exposed to Agent Orange-associated herbicides during the Vietnam War. The IOM report, released in May 2011, 

did validate the Royal Australian Navy study recognizing the possibility of exposure 

by Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans but did not have sufficient evidence to determine how far the dioxin drifted and concluded that the final decision would have 

to be either a policy or legislative determination. 

General Shinseki did, however, reiterate the fact that any Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veteran who wishes to make a claim based on herbicide exposure will still 

have their case reviewed, and the VA will continue to review all Blue Water Navy 

Vietnam Veteran Agent Orange-associated claims on a case-by-case basis. As a result, Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans, and many others, must undergo an extremely arduous process to ‘‘prove’’ the exact same conditions their Army, Marine 

Corps, Air Force and Brown Water Navy counterparts are experiencing. This process includes Vietnam-Era Sailors performing their own individual research to determine if their ship qualifies for compensation. Instructions on researching ships to 

see if they qualify for Agent Orange compensation are at http:// 

www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/shiplist/not-on-list.asp. The link 

to research a ship on the VA website immediately directs the visitor to the call support number and generic email at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in College Park, MD, where the NARA research process can be tedious, 

as the turnaround time to get information is long and requires NARA researchers 

to review ship logs for Sailors. AUSN is advocating for better methods of research 

available to Sailors who are voicing frustration and cannot wait such a long period 

to hear on their qualification results. Possible options AUSN hopes the Committee 

will explore include digitizing ship logs at NARA and coordinating with the VA to 

ensure that Blue Water Vietnam Veterans can conduct quick research at VA Centers around the country, or have these logs available for public research online. 

These measures would eliminate NARA as the ‘middle man’ in order to process 

claims quickly and efficiently. 

AUSN encourages the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee to continue 

its work on the Agent Orange issue and support hearings and further actions on 

pending legislation, such as H.R. 543, the Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act, 

introduced by Representative Chris Gibson (R–NY–19). This bill would amend Title 

38, to clarify presumptions relating to the exposure of certain Veterans who served 

in the vicinity of the Republic of Vietnam, as well as to help alleviate the backlogged 

Agent Orange claims. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

100 

Mental Health Treatment and Professional Development 

AUSN was pleased that the FY13 NDAA was signed into law on 3 January 2013. 

The FY13 NDAA represented great leaps forward in providing our Armed Forces 

and Veterans better mental health care services. Amongst the many provisions in 

the final NDAA were Section 518, authority for additional behavioral health professionals to conduct pre-separation medical exams for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder 

(PTSD), where such professionals will included psychiatrists, licensed clinical social 

workers or psychiatric nurse practitioners; Section 706 which authorizes DOD to 

carry out a pilot program to enhance the efforts of the DOD in research, treatment, 

education and outreach on mental health and substance use disorders and traumatic brain injury (TBI) in members of the Reserve Component, their family members and their caregivers; and Section 726, where in order to improve transparency, 

the VA is required to develop and implement a comprehensive set of measures to 

access mental health care services furnished by the VA, including staffing guidelines 

for specialty mental health care services, including those at community-based outpatient clinics. In addition, AUSN supports the VA’s use of $6.2 billion to expand 

inpatient, residential, and outpatient mental health programs (a 5.3% increase or 

$312 million), further building on last year’s initiatives. This increase in funding 

will help grow outreach for mental health screenings, expand technologies for selfassessment and symptom management of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) 

and enhance other programs to reduce stigmas of mental health. AUSN also praises 

the mental health care advances of H.R. 1627, the Honoring American Veterans and 

Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act, where amongst the provisions of that bill 

are sections from last year’s S. 957, the Veterans’ Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitative Services Improvements Act, which amends the U.S. Code to improve the disability compensation evaluation procedure of the VA for Veterans with PTSD, rehabilitative services for Veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), and enhancement of comprehensive service programs, vastly improving the care available to our 

injured service members. 

Despite previous successes, much work needs to be done in addressing mental 

health treatment and improving the quality and efficiency of VA healthcare. The 

Veteran suicide rate still remains dangerously high. A recent 2 year study, culminating in the release of a 2012 Suicide Data Report in mid-February 2013 by the 

VA, reported that 22 veterans had committed suicide per day in 2010. Furthermore, 

the report estimates that more than 69 percent of Veteran suicides are occurring 

among those aged 50 years and older. This trend is an ongoing issue that AUSN 

hopes the Committee continues to make a high priority. In addition, in regards to 

treatment, there have been numerous complaints amongst the Veteran community 

of the inadequate level of mental health care professionals available to them at clinics across the country. Undersecretary of Veterans Affairs for Health, Dr. Robert 

Petzel, told the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee [in a hearing about mental 

health on 13 February 2013] that the VA is currently working on being more 

proactive in its services to hold its workers more accountable. At the same hearing, 

Dr. Linda Schwartz of the VA Center in Connecticut reiterated the belief that the 

VA needs to stop believing it has to do everything by itself and must work with its 

state level partners to provide local care to Veterans. 

AUSN is closely monitoring these internal VA actions, such as the ones Dr. Petzel 

testified on, that will move the VA into a more proactive direction in regards to 

mental healthcare. Amongst the bills that AUSN is tracking are H.R. 577 and H.R. 

602, introduced by Representatives Steve Stockman (R–TX–36) and Jeff Miller (R– 

FL–01) respectively, the Veterans Second Amendment Protection Act which would 

amend U.S. Code to clarify the conditions under which certain persons may be treated as adjudicated mentally incompetent. AUSN also understands that Representative Tim Walz (D–MN–01) intends to reintroduce the Servicemembers Mental 

Health Review Act. DOD records have shown that from 2001 through 2007, 26,000 

servicemembers were separated from the military because of a personality disorder. 

In 2008, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) conducted a review of several 

hundred of these cases. GAO concluded that thousands of improper personality disorder discharges had occurred. GAO also found that military branches were failing 

to abide by DOD’s directives for diagnosing and discharging Veterans with Personality Disorder (PD). Some service compliance rates were as low as 40 percent. Instead of properly diagnosing these troops with PTSD, DOD diagnosed the service 

members with PD and discharged them from service. DOD has not released any 

records regarding these discharges since 2010 and since PD and Adjustment Disorders (AD) are preexisting conditions, DOD is not obligated to award the 

servicemember the benefits they would have received if they were diagnosed with 

PTSD or TBI. Veterans improperly discharged with a false psychiatric disorder can 

have a difficult time reintegrating into society. In particular, Veterans discharged 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

101 

with PD or AD cannot access the medical retirement benefits they deserve. This 

leaves the disabled Veteran without access to education assistance, Federal employment preference, medical insurance and disability compensation. Furthermore, a 

harmful stigma follows them for life since the diagnosis is indicated on the individuals’ discharge papers, hurting their chances of finding civilian employment. This 

bill would give the Physical Disability Board of Review the authority to correct the 

service records of Veterans wrongly discharged with an improper psychiatric disorder. 

Although there have been great strides in improving the quality of mental 

healthcare for Veterans, AUSN strongly believes much more work needs to be done 

in regards to mental health care and looks for continued support for legislative efforts on identifying and providing adequate care and professionals to help alleviate 

the problems associated with mental illness amongst our veterans. 

Remote Area Access for Veteran Healthcare 

Last year, AUSN was encouraged by the passage of S. 1849, the Rural Veterans 

Health Care Improvement Act, included amongst the provisions of H.R. 1627, the 

Helping Veterans and Camp Lejeune Families Act, particularly Section 110 of H.R. 

1627 which read, ‘‘Recognition of Rural Health Resource centers in Office of Rural 

Health.’’ AUSN is extremely pleased that rural health resource centers now serve 

as satellite offices within the VA’s Office of Rural Health and that the Office’s goals 

are to improve the understanding of challenges, identify disparities in the availability of health care, formulate practices or programs that enhance the delivery of 

health care and develop special practices and products for the benefit of all Veterans 

living in rural areas. In addition, AUSN was happy to see that other sections of the 

bill were aimed to improve the life of rural Veterans such as Section 108 of the bill, 

which directs the VA to carry out an initiative of tele-consultation for the provision 

of remote mental health and TBI assessments in facilities of the Department that 

are not otherwise able to provide such a service. This provision also ensures that 

facilities of the VA are able to provide mental health or TBI assessments to a Veteran through contracting with a third-party provider. 

It is well known that a large population of our nation’s Veterans comes from rural 

areas of the country. This presents numerous challenges to a Veteran if he or she 

has a service-related disability, as time of travel, expense of travel and ability to 

do so are all affected by distanced care centers. The VA is making gains to better 

reach out to our rural Veterans, but there is much more that needs to be done. More 

military treatment facilities and VA clinics in rural areas are the obvious fix. However, simply putting buildings in rural areas will not solve the problem. No matter 

how much effort the VA puts into creating care centers in rural areas, caregiver 

staffing will remain a problem until the VA goes to extremes to properly staff them. 

While there have been many successful measures to help make rural caregiver assignments more desirable in the past, such as the 2008 Rural Access to Health Act, 

the VA must now bolster its efforts to attract caregivers to these areas. Pay, alone, 

does not drive the caregiver or health professional to a certain assignment. VA must 

not only look at financial, but also career and professional incentives to bring the 

best and brightest health care staff to our Veterans. Rewarding a health care professional who volunteers to work in a rural area for three years, for instance, could 

be rewarded with a professional accommodation or, much like in the military, could 

be given special privileges like being placed at the front of the line for extremely 

desirable assignments. This and many other options exist, and the VA must do more 

in terms of attracting promising young health care professionals to needy rural 

areas. 

AUSN fully supports efforts in the 113th Congress, including H.R. 635, the Help 

Establish Access to Local Timely Healthcare for Your (HEALTHY) Vets Act, which 

would allow Veterans to access local healthcare facilities, which will save the Veteran time, money and physical strain. Currently, our Veterans must travel to VA 

hospitals for the majority of their treatments. This distance can often be a major 

roadblock to healthcare for Veterans living in rural areas who have to travel to 

reach the closest VA hospital. The HEALTHY Vets Act would allow Veterans to use 

health providers in their hometowns by directing the VA to contract with local hospitals and doctors on a case-by-case basis to provide medical services to those Veterans who live far away from a VA medical facility. This is the fourth time such 

legislation has been introduced with this aim, and AUSN hopes that it will finally 

be given enough time and consideration that Veterans of rural areas deserve. 

Disability Compensation/Concurrent Receipt 

The VA projects it will receive about 1.25 million claims for Veterans disability 

benefits for this year. As it exists today, a disability rating is assigned (a percentVACREP180 with DISTILLER

102 

age) by the VA after a physical examination for all body systems for which the Veteran is claiming disability. However, a cash benefit is only provided to Veterans 

with a rating of 10% or more. The basic benefit amount ranges from $127 to $2,769 

a month, depending on the disability rating. However, given the economic situation 

faced by many of our Veterans, this compensation may not be adequate to meet 

their needs as costs of living continue to rise. AUSN applauds passage of the Veterans’ Compensation Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) of 2012 passed in November 2012 where 3.9 million Veterans and their families saw their COLA raised by 

1.7%, effective 1 December 2012. 

Though a great step to improve Veteran benefits, these annual COLA bills consume Congress’s time every year. Instead of having to return to the issue over and 

over again every year, AUSN applauds H.R. 570, the American Heroes COLA Act 

of 2013, sponsored by Representative Jon Runyan (R–NJ–06), which would make 

the annual adjustments automatic. The rates of disability compensation for Veterans with service-connected disabilities and the rates of dependency and indemnity 

compensation for survivors of certain service-connected disabled veterans would become an automatic increase. Such automatic increases save Congress time by alleviating an annual issue that is usually passed with little to no opposition, and it 

protects Veteran benefits from being delayed by possible Congressional delays (as 

what happened last fall). This bill, partnered with Representative Runyan’s other 

COLA bill, H.R 569 to provide a COLA increase to take effect 1 December 2013, 

both address the important topic of Veteran benefits while tackling the issue early 

on in the fiscal year. 

In addition, AUSN supports efforts to change the Chained Consumer Price Index 

(CPI) as a method for calculating Veterans disability compensation. We understand 

that during these times, the Federal Government needs to look for methods to save 

money, but AUSN does not support writing such checks through the earned, and 

much needed, benefits of retirees, Veterans, and their families. As Chairman of the 

Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee (SVAC), Senator Bernie Sanders (I–VT) has 

said, ‘‘Do not balance the budget on the backs of disabled Veterans who have lost 

their arms, legs, and eyesight defending our country. Do not balance the budget on 

the backs of working families. Do not adopt the so-called chained-CPI.’’ AUSN, and 

numerous other VSO’s, joined Chairman Sanders on 31 January 2013 at a press 

conference in the Capitol to voice opposition to Chained CPI. More than 55 million 

retirees, widows, orphans and disabled Americans on Social Security could be affected by the switch to a so-called chained CPI. According to the Social Security Administration, the change would result in $112 billion in reduced Social Security benefits over 10 years. The proposed change in how annual COLA are calculated also 

would mean that Veterans who started receiving VA disability benefits at age 30 

would have their benefits reduced by $1,425 at age 45, $2,341 at age 55 and $3,231 

at age 65, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). These are dangerous 

benefits cuts, and alternative methods of lowering spending and the debt need to 

be investigated. 

Veteran Employment/Transition and Housing 

AUSN continues to advocate for continued funding for the Vocational Rehabilitation & Employment (VR&E) Program at the VA. Authorized by Congress under 

Title 38, U.S. Code, Chapter 31 and Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, sometimes referred to as the Chapter 31 program, this program assists Veterans with 

service-connected disabilities to prepare for, find and keep suitable jobs. For Veterans with service-connected disabilities so severe that they cannot immediately 

consider work, this program offers services to improve their ability to live as independently as possible. According to the VA, program participants are expected to increase from 108,000 in 2011 to well over 130,000 this year alone. 

There are still many concerns regarding transitioning from Active Duty to the civilian sector amongst the Veteran communities. Amongst the ones described in this 

testimony, are concerns regarding the experiences of a Veteran while on Active 

Duty, converting to certain civilian sector jobs and license certifications. AUSN is 

pleased that there have been great strides in this area such as last year’s passage 

into law of H.R. 4155, the Veteran Skills to Jobs Act, which directs the head of each 

Federal department and agency to treat relevant military training as sufficient to 

satisfy training or certification requirements for Federal licenses. In addition, the 

inclusion of last year’s Helping Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans Return to Employment (HIRE) at Home Act, S. 3235 and H.R. 4115, in the FY13 helps transitioning 

veterans by encouraging states to consider the specialized military training and experience service members acquire on Active Duty as fulfilling all or some of the 

state certification and licensing requirements. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

103 

Currently, there is a bill this Congress that focuses on medical expertise of Veterans qualifying for license certifications. AUSN supports the House’s recent passage a few weeks ago of H.R. 235, the Veteran Emergency Medical Technician Support Act of 2013, which would amend the Public Health Service Act to provide 

grants to states to streamline state requirements and procedures for Veterans with 

military emergency medical training to become civilian emergency medical technicians. We strongly urge the Senate to take action on this important bill that would 

help to facilitate the employment of Veterans with medical experience. 

Transition Programs 

Last year, AUSN was pleased to see many positive developments with transition 

programs for our Veterans. Most notably in the FY13 NDAA, Section 513, the availability of Transition Assistance Advisors (TAA) to assist members of the Reserve 

Component who serve on Active Duty for more than 180 consecutive days. In this 

particular section, DOD is to establish as part of the Transition Assistance Program 

(TAP) a Transition Assistance Advisor (TAA) program to provide professionals in 

each state to serve as statewide points of contact to assist members of the Armed 

Forces in accessing benefits and health care. In addition, AUSN was pleased with 

the part of S. 3202, the Dignified Burial and Other Veterans’ Benefits Improvement 

Act, which passed into law that contained portions of the Transition Assistance Program (TAP) Modernization Act, S. 2246 and H.R. 4051. Particularly, Sec. 301 of S. 

3202 directs the Secretary of Labor, during a two-year pilot period, to provide TAP 

to Veterans and their spouses at locations other than military installations in at 

least three and up to five states selected by the Secretary based on the highest rates 

of Veteran unemployment. 

AUSN is continuing to monitor the debate on mandating participation in TAP for 

all separating service members as well as expanding its programs. There are still 

many current service members on Active Duty who continue to not understand why 

they would need to participate in the program. However, once service members had 

left the military, many wondered why they never received comprehensive training 

and information on how to access their earned benefits and successfully transition 

from military to civilian life. Unfortunately, some Veterans have no way to reasonably anticipate all of the challenges they may face once out of the military. AUSN 

believes that TAP resources must continue to be made available to Veterans after 

they have transitioned out of Active Duty and expansion of its programs to include 

such items as educational benefit instructions which will significantly help prepare 

service members and their families. There are some encouraging bills that were introduced this Congress that help in these efforts which AUSN supports, including 

H.R. 562, the Veterans Retraining Assistance Program (VRAP) Extension Act of 

2013, which would provide for a three-month extension of the Veterans Retraining 

Assistance Program administered by the VA, allowing for more time for service 

members to take advantage of this important transitional program. Currently, 

VRAP offers up to 12 months of retraining assistance to Veterans who are unemployed, at least 35 but no more than 60 years old, have an other than dishonorable 

discharge, not eligible for any other VA education benefit programs (i.e., the Post?9/ 

11 GI Bill, Montgomery GI Bill, Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment), are not 

in receipt of VA compensation due to Individual Un-employability (IU), and are not 

enrolled in a Federal or state job training program. In addition, AUSN supports 

H.R. 631, the Servicemembers’ Choice in Transition Act of 2013 which provides requirements for the contents of TAP, including, amongst other items, an overview on 

preparations for employment, preparations for education or career or technical 

training and preparations for entrepreneurship. 

Encourage Hiring of Veterans 

AUSN is pleased with the creation and development of the Veterans Jobs Caucus 

in the Senate by co-chairs Senators Joe Manchin (D–WV) and Mark Kirk (R–IL) and 

in the House by co-chairs Representatives Tim Walz (D–MN–01) and Jeff Denham 

(R–CA–10). Their ‘‘I Hire Veterans’’ initiative is a great step in strengthening Congressional support and visibility for Veterans employment issues. In addition, AUSN 

was happy to see the passage into law last Congress of H.R. 3670, requiring the 

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to comply with the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA). This step was taken 

after TSA was found to be violating USERRA when two Transportation Security Officers (TSO’s) in the Reserve Component were dismissed from employment as a result of their service and had their appeals rejected. As a result of the passage of 

the bill into law, TSO’s will now have their jobs protected under USERRA, as it instructs TSA to comply with USERRA when carrying out certain personnel decisions 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

104 

with respect to the employment of air transportation passenger and property screeners. However, overall unemployment numbers amongst Veterans remain high and are 

a top concern of AUSN. Currently, there are over 857,000 unemployed Veterans 

(mostly Vietnam Veterans) throughout the country. In 2012 alone, the unemployment rate for OIF and OEF Veterans hovered at 10%. While this statistic was much 

better than the 2011 rate of 12%, our nation’s returning heroes deserve a better 

chance to be able to work to secure a good future for themselves and their families. 

Despite the jobless rate falling, it is not yet where it needs to be. We must continue 

to strengthen prospects for Veteran employment by extending and strengthening incentives for businesses to employ Veterans. In addition, there are alarming cases 

where Veterans are afraid to put ‘Veteran’ on their job applications in fear of employer’s not wanting to hire them due to some of the complex burdens some of these 

Veterans may carry. This discrimination is something that should be monitored and 

discouraged. 

AUSN supports legislative efforts that seek to improve the employment of Veterans and encourage preferential hiring practices in businesses. One such bill is S. 

6, the Putting Our Veterans Back to Work Act, which provides assistance to small 

business owned by Veterans and improves enforcement of employment and reemployment rights for members of the uniformed services. First, the bill directs the 

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to award grants to hire veterans as firefighters and requires the head of each Executive and Defense agency to consider favorably, as an evaluation factor in federal solicitations for contracts and task or delivery orders valued at or above $25 million, the employment by a prospective contractor of Veterans constituting at least 5% of the contractor’s workforce. S. 6 would 

also extend the VOW to Hire Heroes Act of 2011 through March of 2016, which 

would provide a tax credit to businesses of up to $5,600 for hiring Veterans who 

have been searching for a job for more than six months, as well as a $2,400 credit 

for Veterans who are unemployed for more than a month but fewer than six. Finally, under USERRRA, the bill allows a Veteran with a complaint of a violation 

of employment or reemployment rights under for the Attorney General (AG) to intervene within 60 days after receiving a referral of an unsuccessful attempt to resolve a complaint relating to a state or private employer. 

Homelessness 

Last year, there were many improvements in combating homelessness amongst 

the nation’s Veteran population. In particular, Section 590 of the FY13 NDAA extended the authority to carry out referral and counseling service programs to Veterans at risk of homelessness transitioning from certain institutions from 30 September 2012 to 30 September 2013. In addition, the passage of H.R. 1627 into law 

last year included provisions of S. 3309, the Homeless Veterans Assistance Improvements Act, and S. 3349, the Zero Tolerance for Veterans Homelessness Act. Sections 

301 and 302 of H.R. 1627 expand eligibility for the VA’s emergency shelter services 

to include homeless Veterans who are not seriously mentally ill. Furthermore, these 

sections enhance grant programs for homeless Veterans with special needs by including dependents of Veterans and male Veterans with dependent children. The 

bill also reforms the grant and per diem program, which serves upward of 30,000 

homeless Veterans annually by requiring the VA to report on how to improve the 

per diem payment process for grantees. 

There is still much work to be done to combat homelessness for Veterans, however. On a single night in January 2012, 62,619 Veterans were homeless. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has released annual reports 

since 2009 on the estimates of homeless Veterans and although there was an increase from 75,609 in 2009 to 76,329 in 2010, there was a substantial 12% decrease 

in 2011 to 67,495 homeless Veterans. However, the statistics on homeless Veterans 

are still staggering, as no Veteran should be without a home after serving their 

country. According to data compiled by the VA in January 2011, about 145,000 Veterans nationwide spent at least one night in an emergency shelter or transitional 

housing program. Veterans in the groups of age 31–60 compose the greatest percentages of homeless veterans, but Domiciliary Care for Homeless Veterans (DCHV) has 

reported that of these homeless Veterans, 90% suffer from Substance Use Disorders, 

68% have serious psychiatric problems and 61% are being dually treated. One out 

of every six men and women in homeless shelters is a Veteran, and Veterans are 

50 percent more likely to fall into homelessness compared to other Americans. Looking at returning Veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan, the VA recently report that 

through the end of September 2012, 26,531 of these returning Veterans were living 

on the streets, at risk of losing their homes, staying in temporary housing or receiving Federal vouchers to pay rent. This figure is up from 10,500 in 2010 for returning 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

105 

Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans and the VA says the numbers could be higher because they include only the homeless the Department is aware of. While the VA has 

expressed its goal to end homelessness amongst Veterans by 2015, much work still 

needs to be done. 

AUSN looks forward to hearing about the progress on combating homelessness 

amongst Veterans and urges the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee to 

consider legislation this Congress that addresses these issues and seeks to lower 

these shocking numbers. One such bill is S. 287, which would include as a homeless 

Veteran, for purposes of eligibility for benefits through the VA, a Veteran or Veteran’s family fleeing domestic or dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or other 

dangerous or life-threatening conditions in a current housing situation. 

Claims Processing 

Claims backlogs are an area where there is a broad consensus that a lot of improvement is needed and that existing negative public perception amongst the Veteran community is undoubtedly drawn from the VA’s shortcomings to process them. 

AUSN is pleased with VA’s heightened efforts to modernize itself and these efforts 

are being bolstered by DOD’s modernization efforts as well. In the FY13 NDAA, for 

example, Section 682 required a report by the VA on claims process transformations 

that the VA is currently implementing, whereby no later than 60 days after the 

NDAA was passed into law, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs is to submit to the 

Committees on Armed Forces and the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate 

and House, a report on the plan of the Secretary to reduce the backlog of claims 

for benefits that are pending and to efficiently and fairly process claims for such 

benefits in the future. AUSN looks forward to the findings of this report. It is important in such transformation and modernization efforts to allow Veterans to have the 

ability to transfer their complete service jacket (medical records, etc.) with a single 

click. This effort would seek to completely transform and evolve the VA’s claims 

process into a streamlined system and improve the lives of Veterans throughout the 

country. 

However, integration of these claims systems into one has to be continued in order 

to process claims efficiently. Communication and integration of the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) and Veterans Health Administration (VHA) needs to be 

further developed to have continuity of filing in the VA. The creation of E–BENEFITS, integrating DOD and VA resources into a ‘one-stop- shop’ webpage, is a great 

start, but there are still a few overlaps that cause confusion when Veterans file 

claims and, consequently, when the VA tries to get them processed quickly and, 

most importantly, efficiently. Recent numbers at the VA have shown that there are 

1.4 million various disability compensation and pension claims, which include 4 million education claims, processed in a given year. The VA has noted that by the end 

of this year, no more than 40% of compensation and pension claims will be more 

than 125 days old which is a significant cut from the 60% of claims exceeding that 

mark this past year. 

With 1 million new Veterans expected to be utilizing the VA claims system upon 

returning home from deployment in OIF and OEF, this system of processing needs 

to improve. AUSN continues to be concerned with the efficiency of the claims system 

for our nation’s Veterans and would like Congress to be on the forefront of any efforts to monitor and improve this process at the VA. Even with increases in funding 

over the past few years and positive developments, there still appears to be much 

work to be done in processing claims. 

Veteran Education 

AUSN was pleased to see passage of one of the most significant education bills 

introduced last year, H.R. 4057, the Improving Transparency of Education Opportunities for Veterans Act of 2012, which offers a critical first step in ensuring that 

student Veterans are properly informed about their benefits and have proper recourse for fraud, waste and abuse. AUSN understands that the VA is already taking 

proactive steps to ensure current service members receive educational material 

through the transition assistance program (TAP) and that Veterans who apply for 

GI Bill benefits are exposed to critical information before utilizing this benefit. H.R. 

4057 also highlights available resources to help GI Bill beneficiaries choose the 

school best meeting their educational needs, as Veterans sometimes fall of track towards achieving a higher education. AUSN applauds Congress for coming together 

to help ensure that Veterans and beneficiaries are well versed in how to utilize this 

benefit. 

There have been drastic improvements to education assistance provided to our nation’s Veterans, which AUSN has been pleased to see over the years. The Post-9/ 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

106 

11 GI Bill is a magnificent benefit for today’s Veterans and correcting certain oversights within the bill has improved its usage for the more than 606,000 service 

members, Veterans and family members and survivors that it serves. This benefit 

has potential to help shape and mold future leaders, and AUSN opposes any efforts 

to scale back the benefit as a disservice to the men and women who have fought 

in defense of our nation for the last decade. 

Since the VA implemented the Post-9/11 GI Bill, the Department has primarily 

focused on ensuring student Veterans receive timely, accurate payments to finance 

their education. Unfortunately, as more and more Veterans sought to take advantage of their earned educational opportunities, the VA has stated unequivocally that 

the system used for decades to process Montgomery GI Bill claims would not be able 

to handle the more complex Post-9/11 GI Bill program. Consequently, Congress authorized $100 million to develop a new system, what is now called the ‘‘Long Term 

Solution,’’ or LTS. The major development effort has focused on automating supplemental claims which would comprise the bulk of the interactions between the VA, 

students and schools. This decision left original claims relatively un-automated. As 

a result, an original claim still takes about 45 minutes to process, a time little 

changed from 2009. Without making the system and its information more accessible 

to Veterans and schools, the process of filing the claim is incomplete. It is very apparent that LTS needs to continue evolving in order to handle more complex claims 

under the new Post-9/11 program. In addition, the system still hampers student 

Veterans from receiving up-to-date information about their claims and funding they 

are being provided. Student Veterans have stated that to receive funds, and/or information, the turnaround time could be as long as 2–5 months, a serious time delay, 

when many schools will require funds by certain deadlines. AUSN supports any effort to revise the LTS system in order for claims to not only be filed, but fulfilled 

with an adequate response in a timely manner. 

AUSN continues to advocate for legislative solutions for issues that arise with 

Veteran educational assistance and programs which make Veterans able to use their 

benefit with fluid and flexible options. For example, AUSN supports H.R. 357 and 

S. 257, the GI Bill Tuition Fairness Act of 2013, introduced by Representative Jeff 

Miller (R–FL–01) and Senator John Boozman (R–AR), which would amend title 38, 

U.S. Code, to require courses of education provided by public institutions of higher 

education that are approved for purposes of the educational assistance programs administered by the VA to charge Veterans tuition and fees at the in-state tuition 

rate. Many Veterans of the uniformed services are unable to use their GI Bill at 

an institution of higher education of their choice, because their permanent residence 

is in another state. As public colleges and universities seek ways to offset decreasing 

revenues, many have significantly raised the costs of out-of-state tuition. The cap 

for GI Bill benefits often falls short of this high out-of-state rate. Furthermore, because of the nature of military service, Veterans and beneficiaries often have a difficult time establishing residency for purposes of obtaining in-state tuition rates. 

Circumstances such as these, which oftentimes require individual Veterans to live 

in certain areas, especially during the time when they are separated from the uniformed services, pose significant challenges to using this important benefit. 

In regards to flexibility, AUSN members, particularly those in the Individual 

Ready Reserve (IRR) have been vocal about the concerns regarding flexibility for 

family member transfer of GI Bill benefits. Currently, in regards to Post 9/11 GI 

Bill benefits (Chap. 33, 38 USC), Reserve and Guard GI Bill transfer is based on 

a commitment to continue in the Reserves. This regulation applies to any member 

of the Armed Forces (Active Duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 

1 August 2009 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and has at least 6 years of 

service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional 

years in the Armed Forces from the date of election and has at least 10 years of 

service in the Armed Forces (Active Duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of 

election (precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years). 

A majority of these servicemembers use their GI Bill benefit prior to their enrollment in IRR unless they have come directly off of Active Duty into the IRR (as is 

the case with a few groups of service members). Consequently, current law only provides for transfer eligibility for ‘‘Selected Reserve’’ members. Despite these IRR 

members serving qualifying time for GI Bill benefits completed in either an Active 

Duty or Selected Reserve status, servicemembers that are currently in IRR status 

are ineligible for the transfer option as it currently exists. The requirements for 

transfer of GI Bill benefits affect members in the IRR, as there is no ‘‘guarantee’’ 

anyone who completes their initial service commitment, could have continued with 

the Reserves past this initial commitment. Also, current Active Duty members with 

no Reserve commitment are also not ‘‘guaranteed’’ to join the Reserves for six years 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

107 

after leaving 10 years of service. Servicemembers transfer to the IRR for a variety 

of reasons, such as civilian jobs, travel commitments and even complex family situations, with many staying in that status for several years. AUSN would like to see 

this definition for transferability of the GI Bill benefit expanded to include Armed 

Forces in the IRR. 

Navy Reserve 

Veteran Status for Reservists 

AUSN supports the classification of certain affected groups of our Navy Reservists 

as Veterans of the Armed Forces. Currently, as it exists in the U.S. Code, a member 

of the Reserve Component can successfully complete a Guard or Reserve career but 

not earn the title of, ‘‘Veteran of the Armed Forces of the United States,’’ unless 

the member has served on Title 10 Active Duty for purposes other than training. 

Currently, Title 38 excludes from the definition of ‘‘Veteran’’ career those Reservists 

who have not served on Title 10 Active Duty for other than training purposes. Drill 

training, annual training, Active Duty for training and Title 32 duty are not deemed 

qualifying service to qualify for ‘‘Veteran’’ status. For example, the service of our 

Guard and Reserve members in Operation Noble Eagle (ONE) would not qualify to 

earn the status of ‘‘Veterans of the Armed Forces’’ because it is technically a ‘‘training’’ status. 

AUSN applauds the House of Representatives for passing H.R.1025, the Honor 

America’s Guard and Reserve Retirees Act, in the 112th Congress and sending the 

bill to the Senate. However, H.R.1025, and its Senate companion bill, S. 491, did 

not see any additional action and an amendment to the FY13 NDAA was put on 

hold, despite its strong support amongst the Military Coalition (TMC) and its neutral cost to taxpayers, as scored by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). AUSN 

was pleased to see that the bill was re-introduced in the form of H.R. 679 with a 

bipartisan list of cosponsors including Representatives Tim Walz (D–MN–01), Jon 

Runyan (R–NJ–03), Jeff Denham (R–CA–10), Duncan Hunter (R–CA–50), Tom 

Latham (R–IA–03), Jim Matheson (D–UT–04) and Nick Rahall (D–WV–03). H.R. 

679 would authorize Veteran status under Title 38 for Guard and Reserve members 

of the Armed Forces who are entitled to a non-regular retirement under Chapter 

1223 of 10 USC but were never called to active Federal service during their careers 

through no fault of their own. Furthermore, the bill was written to explicitly include 

stronger language with a, ‘‘Clarification Regarding Benefits,’’ section which states 

that as a result of passage of this bill, no additional benefits may be conferred by 

persons receiving status of ‘Veterans’ under this act. This zero-cost bill also has the 

potential to help combat high levels of unemployment amongst the Reserve Component community, providing ‘Veteran’ status for them to be hired by employers that 

actively seek Veterans in the workplace. 

Again, H.R. 679 would not bestow any benefits other than the honor of claiming 

Veteran status for those who honorably served and sacrificed as career Reserve 

Component members. AUSN believes that our Reserve Component deserve nothing 

less. 

Other Veteran Items of Interest 

AUSN is increasingly concerned with the findings of the impact that Military Sexual Trauma (MST) is having upon separating servicemembers. According to DOD, 

19,000 sexual assaults occurred in the military in 2010, but only about 13 percent 

of victims reported the attacks. In 2011, fewer than 8 percent of reported cases went 

to trial, and fewer than 200 attackers were eventually convicted. In recent studies, 

more than 85 percent of all military sexual assaults go unreported, which means 

Veterans have a hard time meeting the burden of proof when applying for VA benefits. A Navy Sailor’s story, Ms. Ruth Moore, has inspired legislative action. Ms. 

Moore enlisted in the Navy at age 18 and was the victim of sexual assault twice. 

Ms. Moore reported the attacks, but the attacker was never charged or disciplined, 

and she was later labeled as suffering from mental illness and discharged from the 

Navy. Ms. Moore fought for 23 years to get the benefits she was owed after noticing 

her records were tampered with and that she was even diagnosed with a mental 

illness she did not have. AUSN supports legislation by Representative Chellie Pingree (D–ME–01) and Senator Jon Tester (D–MT), in the forms of H.R. 671 and S. 

294, appropriately titled the Ruth Moore Act of 2013, which would amend Title 38 

of the U.S. Code to improve the disability compensation evaluation procedure of the 

VA for Veterans with mental health conditions related to military sexual trauma. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

108 

Conclusion 

The Association of the United States Navy understands that there are difficult decisions ahead in regards to the Continuing Resolution (CR) for the remainder of 

FY13 and the forthcoming FY14 Budget Request. A looming concern here at AUSN 

is the effects of this automatic sequestration trigger upon the DOD. AUSN was 

pleased when DOD military personnel accounts and the VA were exempt late last 

spring from sequestration, however there are many factors to be considered that 

may affect Veterans. Many Federal agencies, DOD included, have preferential hiring practices for veterans, which currently make up close to 44% of DOD’s workforce. Sequestration could result in higher unemployment numbers amongst the Veteran community. We encourage members of both the House and Senate to look at 

our website which has a daily updated Bills of Interest section where we have more 

legislation that is within our priorities that we are tracking on behalf of our members at http://www.ausn.org/Advocacy/BillsofInterest/tabid/2668/Default.aspx. 

AUSN believes that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Department 

of Defense (DOD) are both moving in the right direction, as it pertains to their 

shared commitment to improving the way they care for Veterans. Whether looking 

at modernization of servicemembers’ health records and fitness reports or the much 

improved collaboration efforts between the two Departments themselves, AUSN is 

confident that the framework these two Departments laid out in the 112th Congress 

is of sound structure and will significantly ease the many hardships our brave Veterans now face as we enter the 113th Congress. 

AUSN understands that the VA has, almost since its inception, faced a public perception that views it as an Agency filled with incompetency and waste. The VA’s 

sole purpose is to lessen the suffering and adversities faced by those brave few willing to stand and risk life and limb for our nation’s ideals and what public perception 

fails to understand is that the very reason for the VA’s existence forces the Department, at times, to be more reactionary than proactive. We cannot see wars coming 

a decade before they do. Moreover, we cannot predict what types of tactics and warfare our enemy will use, and what types of wounds we will have to learn how to 

heal. War has irreversible consequences, and the VA is continually adapting to try 

to reduce these consequences as much as possible. AUSN stands ready to be the 

Voice for America’s Sailors, abroad and upon their return home, and looks forward 

to working with Congress and the VA on serving our Veterans. Thank you. 

f 

LTG Guy C. Swan, USA Ret., Vice President, Association of the United 

States Army 

Messrs. Chairmen and Members of the Committees: 

Thank you for the opportunity to present the views of the Association of the 

United States Army (AUSA) concerning veterans’ issues. Both in personal testimony 

and through submissions for the record there exists a long-standing relationship between AUSA and the Senate and House Committees on Veterans’ Affairs. We are 

honored to express our views on behalf of our members and America’s veterans. 

The Association of the United States Army is a diverse organization of almost 

100,000 members – active duty, Army Reserve, Army National Guard, Department 

of the Army civilians, retirees and family members. An overwhelming number of our 

members are entitled to veterans’ benefits of some type. Additionally, AUSA is 

unique in that it can claim to be the only organization whose membership reflects 

every facet of the Army family. 

Each year, the AUSA statement before the committees stresses that America’s 

veterans are not ungrateful. Much of the good done for veterans in the past would 

have been impossible without the commitment of those who serve on the committees 

and the tireless efforts of their professional and personal staffs. 

The inherently difficult nature of military service has never been more self-evident than during the current conflicts. While grateful for the good things done for 

veterans, AUSA reminds our elected representatives that we consider veterans benefits to have been duly earned by those who have answered the nation’s call and 

placed themselves at risk – these are not ‘‘entitlements’’. 

AUSA is heartened that Congress has expressed a commitment to support America’s veterans. Despite this, many are concerned that the declining number of veterans in Congress might in some way lessen the value this institution places on veterans and their service to the nation. We, at AUSA, do not share this opinion. AUSA 

is confident that you - well-intentioned, patriotic men and women – will faithfully 

represent the interests of America’s veterans during fiscal deliberations. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

109 

As elected representatives, you must be responsible stewards of the federal purse 

because each dollar emanates from the American taxpayer. AUSA emphasizes that 

the federal government must remain true to the promises made to her veterans. We 

understand that veterans’ programs are not above review, but always remember 

that the nation must be there for the country’s veterans who answered the nation’s 

call. 

‘‘Providing for the common defense’’ is Job #1 for Congress and our national government. Providing for those who actually execute that task should have an equal 

level of priority for Congress. 

Veterans seldom vote in a block, despite their numbers. This is one reason AUSA 

seeks this forum to speak for its members about veterans’ issues. Our veterans have 

lived up to their part of the bargain; the Congress must live up to the government’s 

part. 

Those who have volunteered to serve their country in uniform deserve educational 

benefits that support their transition to civilian life. AUSA applauds Congress for 

enacting the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 and the more 

recent Post-9/11 Veterans Improvement Act of 2010. These landmark pieces of legislation are helping educate a new generation of veterans by allowing them to enroll 

as a full-time students and to focus solely on education. 

With the Committees’ support, the Department of Veterans’ Affairs has implemented the largest increase in education benefits for our fighting men and women 

since World War II. AUSA has long endorsed a 21st century GI Bill that is built 

on the principles of simplicity, equity and adequate reimbursement of the cost of 

education / training. As we work to fully realize Congressional intent for the program, AUSA believes consideration should be given to having hearings regarding a 

unified architecture for all GI Bill programs for active duty, Guard and Reserve 

under the principle of awarding benefits according to the length and type of duty 

performed. 

Because of Congress’ establishment of the Gunnery Sergeant John D. Fry Scholarship program, children of an active duty member who died in the line of duty after 

September 10, 2001 are eligible for substantially the same benefits as the Post-9/ 

11 GI Bill when they reach age 18. However, surviving spouses are eligible only for 

Survivors and Dependents Educational Assistance (DEA) (Chapter 35, 38 USC) benefits, which for many means college or vocational training is unaffordable. 

For college attendance, DEA pays even less than the Montgomery GI Bill 

stretched out over 45 monthly payments (instead of 36 months for the MGIB). For 

full-time college enrollment, a surviving spouse receives just $987 per month. When 

Congress established the Post-9/11 GI Bill in 2008, it authorized a one-time 20% 

rate hike to the MGIB, but overlooked DEA. Today, the potential total DEA benefit 

is $44,415 compared to $56,304 under the MGIB. So surviving spouses receive substantially reduced benefits under DEA and are not eligible for a housing allowance 

or book stipend under the program. For many survivors with children, college or vocational training is beyond their reach. 

Therefore, AUSA urges Congress to authorize Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits for surviving spouses of the current conflict, the same educational benefit available to their 

children under the Gunnery Sgt. John D. Fry Scholarships, in lieu of Dependents 

and Survivors’ Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits. As an interim measure, if resources are not available to raise DEA reimbursement to the Post-9/11 GI Bill level, 

authorizing survivors of the current conflicts the Post-9/11 GI Bill housing allowance and book stipend under DEA. 

Also, AUSA is concerned about the rising unemployment of Army and other veterans and believes additional full time counseling staff is needed for the Vocational 

Rehabilitation and Employment (VRE) program to support the increasing demand 

among the rising number of disabled veterans. VRE helps equip disabled veterans 

to transition back into the work force. 

AUSA strongly encourages Congress to raise education benefits for National 

Guard and Reserve service members under Chapter 1606 of Title 10. For years, 

these benefits have only been adjusted for inflation. Currently, Reserve GI Bill benefits have fallen to less than 23 percent of the active duty benchmark giving them 

much less value as a recruiting and retention incentive. This also sends a signal 

to Reserve Component personnel that their service is undervalued. Further, a transfer of the Reserve MGIB–Select Reserve authority from Title 10 to Title 38 will permit proportional benefit adjustments in the future. 

Members of the National Guard called to active duty under Title 32 in support 

of the current crisis do not receive veteran’s status for their active duty military 

time. Those called to active duty under Title 10 do receive veteran’s status. Similarly, Army Reserve personnel who are not called to active duty can complete a full 

reserve career and yet not be entitled to be called veterans. This inequity must be 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

110 

addressed. Your support in allowing Guard and Reserve members to earn veterans’ 

status on equal footing with their active duty counterparts will send the message 

that Reserve Component personnel are part of the Total Force. 

Veterans’ medical facilities must remain expert in the specialties which most benefit our veterans. These specialties relate directly to the ravages of war and are 

without peer in the civilian community. We are grateful for the significant increase 

in resources and appropriations, as well as the advanced appropriations process, 

provided by the Congress to the veterans’ health care. Further, AUSA urges members of Congress to sustain the current levels of appropriation funding. After 12 

years of war and approximately 10,000 new veterans per month, cuts to veterans’ 

appropriations would be unconscionable. 

AUSA applauds the unprecedented and historic legislation which authorized the 

unconditional concurrent receipt of retired pay and veterans’ disability compensation for retirees with disabilities of at least 50 percent and the legislation that removed disabled retirees who are rated as 100 percent from the 10-year phase-in period. However, we cannot forget about the thousands of disabled retirees left out by 

this legislative compromise. The principle behind eliminating the disability offset for 

those with disabilities over 50 percent is just as valid for those 49 percent and 

below. AUSA urges that the thousands of disabled veterans left out of previous legislation be given equal treatment and that the disability offset be eliminated completely. 

Another critical area needs to be addressed. For chapter 61 (disability) retirees 

who have more than 20 years of service, the government recognizes that part of that 

retired pay is earned by service, and part of it is extra compensation for the serviceincurred disability. The added amount for disability is still subject to offset by any 

VA disability compensation, but the service-earned portion (at 2.5 percent of pay 

times years of service) is protected against such offset. 

AUSA believes that a member who is forced to retire short of 20 years of service 

because of a combat disability must be ‘‘vested’’ in the service-earned share of retired pay at the same 2.5 percent per year of service rate as members with 20+ 

years of service. This would avoid the ‘‘all or nothing’’ inequity of the current 20- 

year threshold, while recognizing that retired pay for those with few years of service 

is almost all for disability rather than for service and therefore still subject to the 

VA offset. 

Fortunately, legislation provided in previous defense bills extends Combat Related 

Special Compensation (CRSC) to retirees with less than 20 years of service with 

combat or operations-related disabilities. Unfortunately, retirees with non-combat 

disabilities forced to retire short of 20 years of service still have to fund their VA 

compensation dollar-for-dollar from their disability retirement from DoD, and this 

year funding of concurrent receipt for these Chapter 61 medical retirees is not included in the administration’s budget. 

AUSA supports legislation that establishes a presumption of service connection 

for veterans with Hepatitis C (HCV). 

The rules for interment in Arlington National Cemetery (ANC) have never been 

codified in public law. Twice the House has passed legislation to codify rules for burial in Arlington National Cemetery. However, the legislation has not passed in the 

Senate. AUSA supports a negotiated settlement of differences between the House 

and Senate concerning codification of rules for burial in Arlington National Cemetery. Further, ‘‘gray area’’ reservists eligible for military retirement should be included among those eligible for interment at Arlington National Cemetery. 

AUSA appreciates the help of the Veterans Administration in modernizing the 

records keeping and oversight of Arlington National Cemetery, but strongly urges 

that its administration should remain in control of the United States Army. 

AUSA remains opposed to the imposition of an annual deductible on veterans already enrolled in VA health care and any increase in the co-payment charged to 

many veterans for prescription drugs. AUSA urges Congress to continue to oppose 

such fees. 

AUSA supports continuing congressional efforts to help homeless veterans find 

housing and other necessities, which would allow them to re-enter the workforce 

and become productive citizens. 

Much more needs to be done to ensure that returning combat veterans, as well 

as all other service men and women who complete their term of service or retire 

from service receive timely access to VA benefits and services. This issue encompasses developing and deploying an interoperable, bi-directional and standardsbased electronic medical record; a ‘‘one-stop’’ separation physical supported by an 

electronic separation document (DD–214); benefits determination before discharge; 

sharing of information on occupational exposures from military operations and related initiatives. AUSA strongly recommends accelerated efforts to realize the goal 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

111 

of ‘‘seamless transition’’ plans and programs and is deeply disappointed that the 

leadership of the VA and DoD have retreated for the total systems integration that 

is represented by ‘‘iEHR’’. 

We encourage other positive steps toward mutual cooperation taken recently by 

the Department of Defense (DOD) and the VA. The closer we can come to a seamless flow of a servicemember’s personnel and health files from service entry to burial, the more likely it will be that former service members receive all the benefits 

to which they are entitled. AUSA supports closer DOD–VA collaboration and planning including billing, accounting, IT systems, patient records, but not total integration of facilities nor of VA/DOD healthcare systems. 

AUSA strongly supports preservation of dual eligibility of uniformed service retirees for VA and DOD healthcare systems. We applaud Congress’ opposition to ‘‘forced 

choice’’ in the past and encourage you to hold the line in the future. 

AUSA recognizes that progress is being made in reducing the unacceptably high 

numbers of backlogged disability claims. The key to sustained improvement in 

claims processing rests on adequate funding to attract and retain a high quality 

workforce to match the introduction of advanced technology into the VA information 

management system. 

Finally, while AUSA acknowledges and understands the remarkable achievements 

of drone pilots and cyberwarriors during the past decade of war, it joins with many 

veterans and other military-related organizations in urging that the level of precedence of the new Distinguished Warfare Medal be adjusted so that it is below the 

the Bronze Star or the Purple Heart in order to preserve the integrity and prestige 

associated with these awards. 

The committees safeguard the treatment of America’s veterans on behalf of the 

nation. AUSA knows that you take this responsibility seriously and treat this privilege with the gratitude and respect it deserves. Although your tenure is temporary, 

the impact of your actions lasts as long as this country survives and affects directly 

the lives of a precious American resource - her military veterans. As you make your 

decisions, please do not forget the commitment made to America’s veterans when 

they accepted the challenges and answered the nation’s call to serve. 

Thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony on behalf of the members of 

the Association of the United States Army, their families, and today’s soldiers who 

are tomorrow’s veterans. 

f 

Joseph A. Vater, Jr., Esq. (PA), President, ADBC Memorial Society 

Chairmen Sanders and Miller, Ranking Members Burr and Michaud, Members of 

the Senate and House Veterans Affairs Committees, thank you for allowing us to 

present the concerns of veterans of World War II’s Pacific Theater to Congress. The 

American Defenders of Bataan and Corregidor (ADBC) Memorial Society represents 

surviving POWs of Japan, their families, and descendants. 

In 2009, the Government of Japan belatedly recognized the extraordinary abuse 

suffered by the American POWs of Japan. An official apology was offered by the 

Japanese Ambassador to the United States and a course of reconciliation established called the POW/Japan Friendship Program. 

Imagine our dismay when we learned that the new Japanese Prime Minister, 

Shinzo Abe, may rescind Japan’s war apologies. We naturally worry that the reconciliation effort, the POW/Japan Friendship Program, is also in jeopardy. Although 

our membership was, understandably, divided on the value of the 2009 apology, a 

repudiation of the apology and cessation of the popular visitation program would 

send an unambiguous message of disrespect to the former POWs and harm the U.S.- 

Japan Alliance. 

The U.S. State Department’s involvement was vital to the effort to obtain the 

apology and to establish the visitation program. It is our hope that Congress will 

work with the Obama Administration to persuade Japan to hold to its promises and 

responsibilities. Japan needs to be encouraged to do more. 

As way of background, it was at the final convention of the American Defenders 

of Bataan and Corregidor (ADBC) in May 2009 that the Government of Japan 

through the Japanese Ambassador to the U.S., Ichiro Fujisaki, and then again in 

2010 through its Foreign Minister, Katsuya Okada, offered the American POWs of 

Japan an official apology: 

We extend a heartfelt apology for our country having caused tremendous damage 

and suffering to many people, including prisoners of wars, those who have undergone 

tragic experiences in the Bataan Peninsula, Corregidor Island, in the Philippines, 

and other places. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

112 

The Japanese Government followed up the apology by initiating a provisional program for American former POWs to visit Japan and return to the places of their 

imprisonment and slave labor. Nearly all the original Japanese companies that used 

POW slave labor still exist and often continue to operate facilities at the same sites 

associated with their assigned POW camps. Thus far, there have been three trips: 

2010, 2011, and 2012. 

It concerns us that the Abe Administration wants to limit the program to former 

POWs and possibly end the program this year. Widows, children, and other descendants have also been profoundly affected by the POW experiences of their relatives 

and they should be included in future programs. We are concerned about how little 

Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has publicized the program’s accomplishments 

and goodwill. We are troubled that some Japanese companies have refused to allow 

our nonagenarian POWs to visit the sites of their imprisonment and slave labor. 

The success of the POW/Japan Friendship Program should encourage Japan to do 

more. 

Still we wait for Japan’s great multi-national corporations to acknowledge their 

use and abuse of POW labor. Still we wait for Japan to create national memorials 

to the POWs who slaved and died on Japanese soil. Still we wait for memorials for 

American POWs who died on Japan’s Hellships and in occupied territories outside 

Japan such as Taiwan, Northeast China, Wake Island, and Guam. And still we wait 

for Japan to establish a fund to continue this visitation program and to include research, documentation, people-to-people exchanges, and promotion of human rights. 

We want to see the trips to Japan continued and to include widows, descendants, 

and researchers. We want the visitation program to be turned into a permanent program not subject to the Japanese government’s yearly budget review. 

Prime Minister Abe is in a unique position to extend and enhance this visitation 

program. Two of his Cabinet members have family ties to companies that used POW 

slave labor during the war. 

By showing his government’s acknowledgement of the pain inflicted on soldiers 

of what is now Japan’s closest ally, the United States, Prime Minister Abe can 

strengthen bilateral relations at a fundamental level. It would engender trust 

among the Americans tasked with protecting Japan by honoring their veterans, and 

would signal to Japan’s other wartime victims that meaningful reconciliation is possible. 

As you can see from this sampling of impressions by former POWs of their trip 

to Japan, it has brought closure and peace of mind to those who participated: 

This program has really helped my Dad [Harold Bergbower, Past National Commander, ADBC]. For years, Dad would have nightmares after any talk, show, or 

sometimes just because of his years as a POW. Since our visit his nightmares have 

gone. I cannot really put in words what that day at the Japanese Factory in 

Takaoka, Toyama, Japan did. He has not forgotten or totally forgiven but there is 

now a peace to his remembrance. If you are able please consider participating in this 

program. My Dad’s memory is failing on his daily activities but he continues to recall 

his trip to Japan. Now when he talks about his POW experience he can now add 

closure. The audience is amazed at his story. I was honored to go with Dad to Japan. 

If you are a descendant please talk with your parent about the program. It truly is 

a life changer. 

Mr. James Collier later reflected on the trip to Takaoka, whose natural beauty he 

had never recognized while being a POW: ‘‘After meeting the kind people at JMC and 

after observing the beautiful surroundings of the city, I realized that I had been 

robbed of the opportunity of truly knowing this place for the past 66 years. Takaoka 

had always remained as a dark and depressing place in my mind. Yet this visit has 

finally afforded me the opportunity to appreciate its beauty.’’ 

Mr. Roy Friese met up with Mr. Kensuke Morooka, Representative of the Association for Recording Air Raids of Omuta. His family home was completely destroyed 

in the fire-bombing of June 18, 1945. ‘‘I remember I saw POWs when I was a boy 

of thirteen. The skeletal POWs were crammed upright into trucks,’’ he told Mr. Friese 

as they shook hands. ‘‘The facts of sixty-six years ago should never be forgotten. But 

instead of animosity, we have to hold onto our belief that stupid wars should never 

happen again,’’ said Mr. Morooka. ‘‘I had felt various prejudices but they are all gone 

now,’’ said Mr. Friese as he left the POW camp site. 

More observations by former POWs who have participated in the POW/Japan 

Friendship Program are on the Outreach section of our website at www.dg-adbc.org. 

The program is a tangible benefit of the acknowledgement by Japan of some of Imperial Japan’s injustices. 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER

113 

We are grateful for the State Department’s recent efforts to encourage the Japanese government to do the right thing by initiating a process of reconciliation. The 

irony is that in 1995 the Japanese government established a program of reconciliation and exchange for all former Allied POWs with the exception of American 

POWs. We hope that Congress will now encourage the State Department to continue 

to make up for lost opportunities and time. 

We ask for Congress and the Obama Administration to insist that Japan maintain 

its visitation program for former POWs and expand this remarkable program to include family members, to initiate a plan to preserve their history, and support for 

human rights education. 

Thank you for this opportunity to address your committees. 

Æ 

VACREP180 with DISTILLER