alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip Navigation

Health Professions

Advanced Search

      - 
      - 
      - 
      - 

A-Z Index  |     					Questions?  |     					Order Publications

        - HP Home
        - Grants
        - Workforce Analysis
        - Shortage Designation
        - Scholarships/Loans
        - Advisory Committees
        - About

HRSA is helping veterans translate the health care skills gained during their enlistment into civilian medical professions.

Health Professions grants improve access to health care by addressing some of the most pressing needs across the U.S. health workforce.

The Center provides a comprehensive store of health workforce data to inform public policies and private sector investments in the workforce arena.

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 

                  -  Nursing
                  -  Medicine
                  -  Mental/Behavioral Health
                  -  Geriatrics & Allied Health
                  -  Area Health Education Centers
                  -  Public Health
                  -  Dentistry
                  -  Teaching Health Centers
                  -  Diversity
                  -  Scholarships & Loans

Data Banks

Protect the public from health care practitioners, providers, and suppliers with a history of malpractice, adverse actions, fraud and abuse.     Data Banks>

Technical Assistance

 More >>

National Center for Health Workforce Analysis

Research on the state of the healthcare workforce, tracking shortages, trends and issues as they develop. Health Workforce Analysis >

Shortage Designation

Geographic areas, population groups and facilities with too few primary care, dental and mental health providers. Shortage Designation>

News and Announcements

HHS awards $12 million to help Teaching Health Centers train primary care providers (07/19/2013)

Translating veterans’ medical skills into nursing careers (04/29/2013)

The U.S. Nursing Workforce: Trends in Supply and Education (04/26/2013)

Affordable Care Act and HRSA Programs (04/01/2013)

Media Inquiries  |  More News

Open Funding Opportunities

All Open Opportunities

Ask Questions | 				Viewers & Players |                 Privacy Policy | 				Disclaimers | 				Accessibility |                 Freedom of Information Act | 				USA.gov |                 WhiteHouse.gov |                Recovery.gov
** **

**Exhibit 10.5**

 

LoanAgreement, dated September 21, 2001

 

 

REMEDENT USA, INC.

 

 

September 21,2001

Mr. Gary Legator

C/O Mr. Jonathan J. Marine

44821st Street

ManhattanBeach, CA 90266

DearMr. Legator:

This letterwill serve to confirm the agreement between Remedent USA, Inc. (the “Company”)and yourself (the “advisor”).

(1)    The advisor will receive 100,000 fully vested options.  These options will carry a strike price of$0.10 per share, and will be provided as compensation for investor relationsservices to be provided by the advisor. As such, these options will be registered through the filing of an S-8and will be fully registered as advisor compensation.

Theabove-mentioned terms are agreed upon on this day, by the following:

 

 

| /s/ Kenneth J. Hegemann |   | /s/ Stephen F. Ross     |   | /s/ Gary Legator |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|------------------|
| Kenneth J. Hegemann     |   | Stephen F. Ross         |   | Gary Legator     |
| Chief Executive Officer |   | Chief Financial Officer |   | Advisor          |
| Remedent  USA, Inc.     |   | Remedent  USA, Inc.     |   |             |

 

 

 

 

 

17555 VENTURA BLVD..SUITE 200 • ENCINO, CA • 91316

PHONE: (818) 922-0585 • FAX: (818) 922-0584
# ( n.. An 

### Aut!:ority to con:::t:-uct &h3.ll expirP. and **th~** a.pr:lic:.:lti<>n sh:1ll be c<>nc,;J.l!d t'.:o ::·e;::r::; !'ro:a 

### the C.R-::e of issu<>.ncc of 

### the aut!-.ori

## t:r tr. ccn-
**.::~ru:.**

### t. b. An u:plic:ttio::. **:~;;** pcr:-:it to 

### operate **~:d.stiur; equi;rr.·~r.'c.**  **~;C.all** 

### be
Exhibit 99.1
 
 
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003)
 
 I, Donald R. Katz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Audible, Inc. (the Registrant), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the Report):
 
 (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) [15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 
 /s/ Donald R. KatzName:
Donald R. KatzDate:
May 13, 2003
EXHIBIT
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 Date:     February
      14,  2011
                By:
                /s/
      Guy De VreeseName:  Guy
      De VreeseTitle:    Chief
      Executive Officer
                  (Principal
      Executive Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 19, 2016

Order 

Clerk

August 19, 2016

153787(132)

ARMEN BOLADIAN, BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC., and WESTBOUND RECORDS, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, SC: 153787

v COA: 324737

Oakland CC: 2014-138753-CZ

JEFFREY P. THENNISCH, THE DOBRUSIN 

LAW FIRM, P.C., f/k/a DOBRUSIN & 

THENNISCH, P.C., GREGORY J. REED and 

JANYCE TILMON-JONES,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs-appellants to extend the time 

for filing their reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if 

submitted on or before September 6, 2016.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3009 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds and resources for congressional travel 

to the People’s Republic of China. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 4, 2023 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds and resources for 

congressional travel to the People’s Republic of China. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Overseas Congres5 sional Help for International Negotiations with Adver6 saries Act’’ or the ‘‘NO CHINA Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FEDERALLY FUNDED CONGRES8 SIONAL TRAVEL TO CHINA. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi10 sion of law— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3009 IS

1 (1) Federal funds made available before, on, or 

2 after the date of enactment of this Act shall not be 

3 expended for any congressional delegation or other 

4 congressional trip to the People’s Republic of China; 

5 and 

6 (2) Federal resources, such as military aircraft, 

7 shall not be used for any such delegation or trip. 

8 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec9 tion shall be construed to apply to congressional travel to 

10 Taiwan. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
From: Richard Krock <rkrock@vinylinfo.org>

To: Jodi Howard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 09/21/2009 04:04 PM

Subject: RE: VI Support Information for September 28 Meeting with EPA

Dear Ms. Howard,

Please find attached our non-confidential submission of our PVC MACT working group summary. I am resending all the block flow diagrams consolidated into one workbook as well. Please accept my apology for any delay this may have caused in getting the information communicated within your organization prior to our September 28 meeting. Please do not hesitate to contact me if any other questions or issues arise. Thank you.

*Please note our new contact information*

Richard Krock Technical Director

The Vinyl Institute 1737 King Street Suite 390 Alexandria, VA 22314 Direct: 571.970.3392 Mobile: 571.216.4474 Fax: 571.970.3271 Email: rkrock@vinylinfo.org http://www.vinylinfo.org http://www.vinylindesign.com

(Embedded image moved to file: pic29063.jpg)VI Logo

From: Richard Krock Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 3:43 PM To: 'Howard.Jodi@epamail.epa.gov' Subject: VI Support Information for September 28 Meeting with EPA

Dear Ms. Howard,

As we discussed, The Vinyl Institute held a working group meeting this week to identify common issues that are involved in completing the PVC MACT 114 Request. The attached letter articulates our discussions, concerns, and proposals. We would like to review this letter and the two attached block flow diagrams and attached test setup sketch in detail at our planned meeting from 1:00 to 3:00 pm on September 28, 2009. Attendees from The Vinyl Institute membership at the meeting will be: Mary Bachynsky (Formosa), Barry Christensen (OxyChem), Kevin Bloomer (Westlake), Mark Garza (ShinTech), Otis Sistrunk (PolyOne) and Rich Krock (Vinyl Institute). We understand that you will also have a conference call line available for some of the members who will not be able to physically attend. Please forward that information to me and I will send it out to our members. We appreciate the opportunity to meet with you and your colleagues and look forward to our discussion. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or comments. Thank you.(See attached file: VI PVC MACT STack Resin Testing Block Flow Diagram and Method 316 sketch 9-17-09.xls)(See attached file: EPA PVC MACT Testing VI Work Group Proposal 9-21-09.pdf)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27553]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-7-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

October 10, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 3, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124-1000, filed 
in Docket No. CP98-7-000 a request pursuant to Secs. 157.205, 157.212 
and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.212 and 157.216) for authorization to upgrade the 
Marquette #1A and Negaunee #1 town border stations in Marquette County, 
Michigan, under Northern's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
CP82-401-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more 
fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and 
open to public inspection.
    Northern proposes to upgrade the two existing delivery points by 
replacing the existing meters, regulators and associated piping. 
Northern estimates that the peak day and annual volumes to be delivered 
to SEMCO Energy Gas Company (SEMCO) are 9,612 MMBtu and 982,346 MMBtu 
at the Marquette #1A and 3,748 MMBtu and 383,046 MMBtu at the Negaunee 
#1. Deliveries of the estimated volumes will be made pursuant to 
Northern's currently effective throughput service agreements with 
SEMCO. Northern states that SEMCO requested the proposed delivery point 
upgrades to accommodate a growth of natural gas requirements in the 
respective areas. The total estimated cost to upgrade is $130,000.
    Northern states that the proposed activity is not prohibited by its 
existing tariff, that it has sufficient capacity to accomplish 
deliveries without detriment or disadvantage to its other customers and 
that the total volumes delivered after the request will not exceed 
total volumes authorized prior to the request.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27553 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Technest Holdings, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
      do hereby certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











**/s/
                Robert Tarini**
            
            **/s/
                Gino M. Pereira****Robert
                Tarini**
            
            **Gino
                M. Pereira****Chief
                Executive Officer**
            
            **Chief
                Financial Officer****Date:
                November 21, 2005**
            
            **Date:
                November 21, 2005**
#### BORGES et al. v. LOFTIS et al. *

No. 8406.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 18, 1937.

J. L. Royle, of Fresno, Cal., and Grove J. Fink, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

Roger R. Walch, Dist. Atty., of Hanford, Cal., and Frank B. Collier, Deputy Dist. Atty., of Modesto, Cal., for appellees.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

*

Rehearing denied Feb. 23, 1937.

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order refusing an application for a temporary injunction and dismissing the bill in equity filed by appellants to enjoin enforcement of County Ordinance No. 158 of Kings County, Cal., enacted to control bovine tuberculosis. The ordinance requires that cattle shall be subjected to a test for tuberculosis and that such cattle as, by the-reaction to the test, are shown to have tuberculosis, shall be slaughtered.

The appellants alleged in their bill that their cattle were free from disease, that they had not yet been tested, but that a notice had been served upon them that the inspecting authorities contemplated making a test. Without awaiting the result of the test, they brought this action to enjoin the officers in attempting to enforce the county ordinance in question.

It is clear that the action is premature. The appellants base their action upon allegations which they claim justify their apprehension that some of their cattle, although free from disease, will be shown by the test *735to be diseased. Their complaint is that, after the determination by the officials of the county and state that the cattle are tubercular, no opportunity is afforded to the owner for hearing upon the question of whether or not the cattle-are diseased. It is clear that, until there is an adverse finding as to the health of some or all of their cattle, appellants who alleged that their cattle are free from disease cannot invoke the aid of the court upon the assumption that a well-recognized scientific test required by the ordinance will show such healthy cattle to be diseased. It cannot be said that the alleged injury is “certainly impending.” See Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. State of West Virginia, 262 U.S. 553, 593, 43 S.Ct. 658, 67 L.Ed. 1117, 32 A.L.R. 300.

The appellants claim that the District Judge should have called in another District Judge and a Circuit Judge as required by section 266 of the Judicial Code (28 U.S.C.A. § 380), and that, not having done so, he acted without jurisdiction. The answer to this contention is that the county ordinance was not a state statute within the meaning of Judicial Code § 266. The fact that the county ordinance was adopted in conformity with a state plan applicable to a large number of counties in the state does not convert the ordinance passed by the county board of supervisors into a statute of the state.

The bill was prematurely filed, and for that reason did not state a cause of action for the issuance of an injunction. It is therefore unnecessary to pass upon the other phases of the case. The trial court had jurisdiction.

The order denying the application for a temporary injunction and the decree dismissing the bill are affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-81128, No. 333-60500, No. 333-51856, No. 333-36982, No. 333-95883, No.
333-88671, No. 333-77793, No. 333-58311 and No. 333-34645 on Form S-3 and
Registration Statements No. 333-113346, No. 333-89764, No. 333-92905, No.
333-50391, No. 333-34711 and No. 333-04717 on Form S-8 of (1) our report dated
March 16, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of ProxyMed, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion on the Company's consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern) and (2) our report dated March
16, 2005 relating to management's report on the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of ProxyMed, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 16, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2925 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2925

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to set the rate 
of pay for employees of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection in 
                 accordance with the General Schedule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 26 (legislative day, September 22), 2023

Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. Tillis) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to set the rate 
of pay for employees of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection in 
                 accordance with the General Schedule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CFPB Pay Fairness Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. RATE OF PAY FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL 
              PROTECTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1013(a)(2) of the Consumer Financial 
Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5493(a)(2)) is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``(2) Compensation.--The rates of basic pay for all 
        employees of the Bureau shall be set and adjusted by the 
        Director in accordance with the General Schedule set forth in 
        section 5332 of title 5, United States Code.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 90 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Harlton COWART, Appellant, v. HUGHES SUPPLY, INC., Appellee.

No. 70-703.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 10, 1971.

David S. Yost, of Cramer, Robinson, Ginsburg & Ross, Sarasota, for appellant.

Carrol F. Dillon, Sarasota, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Morgan v. Marshall, 1919, 78 Fla. 59, 82 So. 609,

LILES, A. C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.

MANN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

MANN, Judge

(concurring specially).

Our courts are always open as an avenue toward justice, but not as a refuge from it. Harlton Cowart, Marvin L. Cow-art and Tholan H. Cowart, doing business as Tailor Maid Industries, were sued for $6,142.61 due on account of goods sold between January 12 and September 2, 1966. No answer was filed, and default was entered January 13, 1967 at 8:42 a. m. At 2:35 p. m. that day an amended complaint was filed in which the balance due on the same account was put at $4,007.23. The amended complaint alleges also that the defendants had registered their fictitious *172name, but that Tailor Maid Industries, Inc. had been incorporated on June 27, 1966. It was added as a defendant.

Harlton Cowart moved on July 23, 1970 to set aside the default judgment, stating in his motion that the amended complaint, which was not served on him, “materially changes the cause of action.” This is plainly untrue in any legally significant sense. The only changes are to acknowledge a lower balance than at first alleged and to include an additional defendant liable for all or part of the obligation. Appellant cannot possibly be worse off as a consequence of these changes.

The strongest argument against appellant’s motion is that it includes no allegation that he has, or, if it be granted, intends to pursue, any defense to the action. Our Supreme Court has long held that one who seeks to vacate a default must allege that some useful purpose would be served by the vacation. Morgan v. Marshall, 1919, 78 Fla. 59, 82 So. 609, is in point. Cowart cannot complain three years after a default is entered against him that there is some non-prejudicial technical lapse in the pleadings. He is better off owing four thousand than six.