alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

FEB l 9 2019 

In Reply Refer To: HCR-20 

DOT# 2019-0013 

Subject: Dismissal of Complaint DOT# 2019-0013 

Dear

This Jetter is to inform you that the Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) Office of Civil 

Rights has determined that it will dismiss the above complaint, which allege violations that may 

be related to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the U.S. Department of Transportation 

(USDOT) Title VI implementation regulations at 49 C.F.R. Part 21 and/or FHWA's Title VI 

regulations at 23 C.F.R. Part 200 (hereinafter Title VI). Title VI prohibits discrimination on the 

basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial 

assistance. To be accepted for investigation, a complaint must meet the jurisdictional 

requirements described in FHWA 's Investigations Manual, which conforms to the U.S. 

Department of Justice's procedures and standards for investigating complaints of discrimination. 

First, the complaint must be in writing. Second, it must describe an alleged discrimjnatory act 

that, if true, would foll under fHW A's jutisdiction and potentially violate FHWA 's Title VJ 

regulations. Finally, it must be fil.ed within 180 calendar days of the alleged discriminatory act. 

You allege that in September, 2017, your firm a certified 

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) inet e District of Columbia, executed a subcontract 

with prime contractor HNTB Inc. to perfom1 services on a D.C. Dept. of Transportation (DDOT) 

project, the South Capitol Street Bridge Project. In May, 2018, you allege HNTB determined that 

your firm was unable to perfonn certain tasks subcontracted to it, and that HNTB informed you 

of its intention to modify tbe contract and remove some items fr

om your firm's scope of work. 

You state that you disagreed with this decision and that HNTB refused to reconsider or to review 

documentation to refute HNTB's dete,mination. You fwther allege that HNTB staff verbally 

degraded you and your firm and that DDOT ignored your concerns. 

However, after careful consideration, FHW A has detennined the allegations and facts in your 

complaint do not meet the minimum criteria fr

om ,.v

hich FHWA could establish a case of 

disparate treatment or disparate impact under Title VJ. For these reasons, this complaint wi II be 

dismissed by FHWA and closed with no further action. 

If you have any questions, please contact Nichole McWho11er at (202) 366-1396. 
Sincerely, 

Title Vl Team Leader 

Office of Civil Rights 

Cc: Chris Lawson, Division Administrator, FHW A D.C. Division Office 

Tanya Emam, Assistant Division Administrator, FHW A D.C. Division Office 

Janine Ashe, Civil Rights Manager, FHWA D.C. Division Office 

James Esselman, Senior Attorney-Advisor, FHWA Office of the Chief Counsel 

Kevin Resler, National Title VI Program Coordinator, FHW A Office of Civil Rights 

Yvette Rivera, Director, Equal Employment Opportunity Programs Division, Departmental 

Office of Civil Rights 

Page 2 of2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      120
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,668
<PP&E>                                          46,193
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,230
<BONDS>                                         38,469
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,224
<SALES>                                              0<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,240
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,717
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   515<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,104
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,104
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,104
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00
<FN>
<F1>The Company's revenues relate primarily to income from rental property.
<F2>Other expenses reflects the Company's general and administrative expenses.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[4910-I3-JP]

Ul'ING SYMBOL DATE

(DOT). ACTION: Final rule. 

# I "
SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products list .~ above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airwlrthiness information (MeAl) I "

### 'w",---- originated by an aviation authority of another country 

### tolidentifY and correct anunsafe F\ftrNCiSYMBOL
"ITIALSiSIG condition on anaviation product. The MeAl describes t eunsafe condition as:



# . I 

# r~m - Inthe past, some operators have reported difficulties to pressurise 

## L the hydraulic reservoirs, due to leakage ofthb Crissair reservoir air ~""MIlOL pressurisation check valves. 

## *

## ** The leakage ofthe check valves was caused by an incorrect spring material. llhe affected Crissair check valves 

## **

## *were then replaced with itnproved check valves PIN [part number] 2S2794-1 

## ** *. Ainvorthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 Series Airplanes; Model A300 B4-600, 

# I B4-600R, F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model C4-605R Variant F Airplanes 

# I (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes); and All 0 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Admini.stration (FAA), 

### Dcbartment ofTransportation RlN 2120-AA64 Federal Aviation Administ.-ation DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

## I\-N)"( - NITlALSISJG 

### {.u.r- 14 CFR Part 39 ~

## '1('l.{IO (Docket No. FAA-20ID-DInj Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-189-AD; Amendmen U1INGSYMElOL 

## Jr,~g lI-bO 

# ·l\Nu-( 39- •.•. H "-; AD20]O-~l N

More recently. similar issues were again reported on aeroplanes with Crissair check valves PIN 2S2794-1 insb1Jed. The investigations 

## ***have shown that a spring, mounted inside the valve, does not meet the Airbus type design Specifications.
DWS VARIABLE SERIES II

   SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUS OF THE LISTED PORTFOLIOS:

                             ----------------------

                             DWS Mid Cap Growth VIP
                            DWS Small Cap Growth VIP

Effective immediately, the following information replaces similar information
about the portfolio management team in the "Portfolio management" section of
the portfolios' prospectus:

The portfolio is managed by a team of investment professionals who collaborate
to implement the portfolio's investment strategy. Each portfolio manager on
the team has authority over all aspects of the portfolio's investment
portfolio, including, but not limited to, purchases and sales of individual
securities, portfolio construction techniques, portfolio risk assessment and
the management of daily cash flows in accordance with portfolio holdings.

The following people handle the day-to-day management of the portfolio:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                        <C>
  Joseph Axtell, CFA                                                Rafaelina M. Lee
  Managing Director of Deutsche Asset Management and Portfolio      Director of Deutsche Asset Management and Portfolio Manager of
  Manager of the portfolio.                                         the portfolio.
   o Joined Deutsche Asset Management in 2001 and the portfolio      o Joined Deutsche Asset Management in 1999 and the portfolio
     in 2006.                                                          in 2008.
   o Senior analyst at Merrill Lynch Investment Managers for the     o Research analyst for US Micro, Small and Mid Cap Equity: New
     international equity portion of a global balanced portfolio       York.
     (1996-2001).                                                    o Over 20 years of investment industry experience in US
   o Director, International Research at PCM International             portfolio strategy, Latin America market strategy and US
     (1989-1996).                                                      equity research at JP Morgan Securities, UBS Securities and
   o Associate manager, structured debt and equity group at            Goldman Sachs & Co.
     Prudential Capital Corporation (1988-1989).                     o BA, Columbia University; MBA, Stern School of Business, New
   o Analyst at Prudential-Bache Capital Funding in London             York University.
     (1987-1988).
   o Equity analyst in the healthcare sector at Prudential
     Equity Management Associates (1985-1987).
   o BS, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota.
</TABLE>








               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference




                                                                     [Logo]DWS
                                                                   INVESTMENTS
                                                           Deutsche Bank Group

August 14, 2009
VS-3625
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo20822 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-72996)  pertaining to The Morgan Group, Inc. Incentive Stock Plan and
in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-72998)  pertaining to The Morgan
Group,  Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan of our report dated March 27, 1997, with
respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of The Morgan  Group,  Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.



                                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 27, 1997
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo20813 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51163-51164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25922]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


Combined Arts Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Combined Arts Advisory Panel, Theater Section A (Creation & 
Presentation category) to the National Council on the Arts will be held 
on October 20-24, 1997. The panel will meet from 9:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 
on October 20-22, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on October 23, and from 
9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on October 24, in Room 730 at the Nancy Hanks 
Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506. A 
portion of this meeting, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Thursday, 
October 23, will be open to the public for a policy discussion of 
guidelines, planning, Leadership Initiatives, and field needs and 
trends.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 
on October 20-22; from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on October 23, and from 
9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on October 24, are for the purpose of Panel 
review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on applications for 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the 
determination of the Chairman of March 31, 1997, these sessions will be 
closed to the public pursuant to subsection c4, and 6 and 9B of section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the

[[Page 51164]]

Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-
TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: September 24, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-25922 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.12 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EXTRADITION 

 Instrument Amending the 

Treaty of July 13, 1983 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and IRELAND 

Signed at Dublin July 14, 2005 

with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 IRELAND 

 Extradition 

Instrument amending the treaty of July 13, 1983. 

Signed at Dublin July 14, 2005; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-14, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-12, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Diplomatic Notes at Washington 

 August 11 and 12, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010. 

With annex.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (i) Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-41527, No. 33-55446, No. 33-55448, No. 33-78848, No. 33-78844,
No. 333-44763, No. 333-44765, No. 333-13007, No. 33-78834, No. 33-95270, No.
333-13015 and No. 333-07879) of NTL Incorporated (the "Company") and (ii)
Registration Statements (Forms S-3 No. 333-00118, No. 33-92792, No. 333-07879,
No. 333-16751, No. 333-72335, No. 333-66855 and No. 333-63615) of the Company
and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated March 26, 1999, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of the Company included  
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.




                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP



New York, New York
March 26, 1999
----

----

| 1.   | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |   |                               |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
| Dated:  March      3, 2009 |   | /s/      William D. Snider         |
|                                 |   | William      D. Snider             |
|                                 |   | Chief      Financial Officer       |
|                                 |   | (Principal      Financial Officer) |
|                                 |   |                               |

----

----
#### OAKDALE CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation, Appellant, v. OCALUM CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. O-425.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.
As of 11/25/2013 the way to access the current and older editions of the Feed the Future E-Newsletter is to access the following web address: www.feedthefuture.gov/resources/128. This will perform a search that finds all issues. The issues themselves are not stored on the site and all issues up to and including the Nov. 2013 can be found in folders in this directory.
**Virtual Reality Lab Tour Script**

**YouTube Information:**

Title: Virtual Hydraulics Lab Tour – Virtual Reality

Description: A brief overview of how virtual reality is used to advance hydraulics research.

**Script:**

Virtual reality enables a user to view computer models and sites of interest in first person view. This allows for a thorough immersion of an individual in the content to better comprehend the topic.

**508 Caption Description:**

The video shows a photograph of a lab staffer instructing a guest wearing the virtual reality goggles and holding two joysticks. In the corner of the video, a sample computer simulation is shown of a flow surrounding multiple bridge piers.
No. 00-7099.

#### Miller *v.*LoJac Enterprises, Inc.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SURJIT KAUR GILL,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73091

Agency No. A078-656-860

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 14, 2013** 

Before: SCHROEDER,GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Surjit Kaur Gill, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our

FILED

AUG 29 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-73091

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

adverse credibility findings. Singh v. Holder, 643 F.3d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir. 2011). 

We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Gill testified that the police persecuted her and her family because of her

brother Surkhjinder Singh Gill’s political activities. Gill initially testified that she

did not have other siblings besides Surkhjinder. But, Gill then admitted that she

had another brother and two sisters, and did not testify they had experienced any

problems. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility finding

based on these statements. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir.

2011) (inconsistencies that go to the heart of a petitioner’s claim may deprive the

claim of the requisite ring of truth); see also Singh, 643 F.3d at 1181 (petitioner’s

decision to lie to immigration authorities constituted substantial evidence

supporting an adverse credibility finding). The agency was not compelled to

accept Gill’s explanations for the false statements. See Zamanov v. Holder, 649

F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2011). Further, we lack jurisdiction to review any new

argument Gill makes in her opening brief that the false statements were the result

of translation problems, because Gill did not raise this to the BIA. See Barron v.

Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004). In the absence of credible testimony,
3 11-73091

Gill’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348

F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Because Gill’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony the BIA found not

credible, and the record does not otherwise compel the conclusion that it is more

likely than not that she will be tortured if returned to India, her CAT claim also

fails. Id. at 1156-57.

Finally, we lack jurisdiction to consider Gill’s challenge to the denial of

voluntary departure. 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(f); Alvarez-Santos v. INS, 332 F.3d 1245,

1255 (9th Cir. 2003). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
#### Gary Bernard WOOLBRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. LL-20.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 15, 1978.

*465Gary Bernard Woolbright, in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not err in finding that appellant’s motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence did not substantially comply with Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. *Swain v. State,*355 So. 865 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1978). The order appealed is affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s rights to file a proper motion.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.
#### Otis N. NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1682.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 28, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler, Chief, App. Div., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Basil S. Diamond, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *Russo v. State,*340 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., concur.

DAUKSCH, J., dissents.

DAUKSCH, Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. While the defendant was properly tried and convicted of receiving stolen property the judgment suffers the same technical defect as the judgment in *Spurlock v. State,*281 So.2d 586 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973) in that it fails to recite knowledge on the defendant’s part. Therefore, I would remand for the entry of a new proper judgment. *Brinson v. State,*345 So.2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).