alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and notes included in this Form 10-K405 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,238
<SECURITIES>                                     9,371
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         30
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,022
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,650
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    109
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                108
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       108
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)



</TABLE>
bCT'OSV'Mi^'lOO^ 

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER 

SEANPARNELL. GOVERNOR 

3132 CHANNEL DRIVE 

POBox 112500 

JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-2500 

FAX: 

PHONE: 

(907) 586-8365 

(907) 465-3900 

Septembers, 2010 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: DOT-OST-1996-2009-0079 

m 

I 

D 

O 

CO 

O Q 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

This letter is to express support for the continuation of the Essential Air Service (EAS) program 

in Alaska and the crucial connection it brings to our remote communities. 

Due to the isolated location of these communities and the complete lack of any road system 

connection, this subsidized air service is their only form of schediiled transportation. The 

communities of Cape Yakataga and Icy Bay depend on scheduled air freight, passenger and mail 

service for basic necessities, routine medical and health services, and economic welfare. 

The State of Alaska continues to assert that the local residents are best positioned to comment on 

particular schedules or air carriers and therefore we leave those specific areas for the community 

to comment on. 

I respectfully urge USDOT to support and continue the EAS service at Cape Yakataga and Icy 

Bay. 

Sincerely, 

Marc KuUc^ 

Deputy Commissioner of Aviation 

cc: Leo von Scheben, Commissioner, DOT&PF 

PntviJini^ for the safe movement af people and i^oods and die del/very of shite sarvie
Exhibit 4.1



FORM OF SPECIMEN STOCK CERTIFICATE



LookSmart, Ltd.

transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder
hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.



WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly
authorized officers.



LSL



THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN NEW YORK, NY OR JERSEY CITY, NJ



INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE



SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

CUSIP 543442 50 3



This certifies that is the record holder of



FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF SECRETARY PRESIDENT



COUNTERSIGNED and registered:

MELLON INVESTOR SERVICES LLC

TRANSFER AGENT and registrar



|   |  |                     
|-- |  | --------------------
|   | 
|BY |  |                     
|   |  | AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE



LookSmart, Ltd.



The Corporation will furnish to any stockholder, upon request and without charge, a statement
of the powers, designations, preferences, and relative participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EDWARD J. NICHOLAS, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-279 Erie

v. )

)

COMMONWEALTH OF )

PENNSYLVANIA, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on September 27,

2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 2], filed on

September 27, 2005, recommended that this action be transferred to the United States

District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The parties were allowed ten

(10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by

certified mail and on Respondents. Petitioner filed objections on October 4, 2005 [Doc.

No. 4]. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with

the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is to be transferred to the United

States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 2] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on September 27, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00279-SJM-SPB Document 6 Filed 10/06/05 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 10.9

                               DELTA MUTUAL, INC.
                       1730 Rhode Island Avenue, Suite 812
                             Washington, D.C. 20036
                                Tel: 203.820.4831

                                                             February 4, 2003


J. Dapray Muir
Suite 600
717 K Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20036

Dear Mr. Muir:

          This will serve as an agreement between Delta Mutual, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company") and you with respect to compensation for your past
services to the Company.

          The Company acknowledges that you performed legal services for it from
April 1, 2001 to November 1, 2002, and that you are currently providing legal
services. Services in 2001-2002 related primarily to reviewing a Form S-4
Registration Statement prepared by Campbell & Jackson, and numerous amendments
thereto, for a proposed acquisition of Enterprises Solutions, Inc. Services also
included preparation and filing of a proxy statement. None of such services
related to a capital-raising transaction nor were they promotional services.

          Fees for such services amounted to $32,250.44. The Company
acknowledges that the $32,250.44 invoiced for such services is reasonable and
due and owing, and that you are entitled to interest in an amount of $2,418.78,
making a balance due of $34,669.22.

          Pursuant to our discussions, you have agreed to accept 50,000
restricted Shares of the Company's common shares (the "Shares") against such
indebtedness. The amount of the Company's indebtedness to you will be reduced by
the proceeds of such sale, and any indebtedness remaining after such sale will
remain an obligation of the Company to you. The Company agrees to file a
registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-8,
to include your Shares in such registration statement, and to use its best
efforts to cause such registration statement to become effective under the
Securities Act of 1933 in the first half of 2003. We will notify you as soon as
the registration statement becomes effective, and provide you with a reasonable
number of copies of the prospectus for your use in selling the Shares.

          If these terms are agreeable, please so indicate by signing your name
where indicated below, and returning a signed copy to me.

                                                       Very truly yours,
                                                       Delta Mutual, Inc.


                                                  by:  /s/ Kenneth Martin
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Kenneth Martin, President
Agreed and Accepted:


  /s/ J. Dapray Muir
      -------------------------
      J. Dapray Muir
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    17,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3,179
<INVENTORY>                                     189,059
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                           64,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                   20,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  332,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            131
<OTHER-SE>                                      175,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    332,896
<SALES>                                          53,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                318,964
<CGS>                                            32,354
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    80,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1,710
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7,837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  44,810
<INCOME-TAX>                                     18,907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              25,903
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   2,508
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     23,395
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      1.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.73
        


</TABLE>
#### Allen J. LEJEUNE v. CITY OF EUNICE et al.

No. 62143.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: Allen J. LeJeune, applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of St. Landry.

Writ denied.
p. 1 

01~~17-- 203- 00/~ 

C- PONT 3,> 0 ~'i I 

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts 

Chambers Works 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

October 14, 2010 

Document Control Office 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room 6428 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Re: EPA - HQ - OPPT - 2003 - 0012 

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100 

PFOA Data Submittal - Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

July / August 2010 Sample Data 

Dear Document Control Office : 

As per Part IV, Section G.5 .a of the NJPDES permit, we are submitting a summary of PFOA 

analytical results for the weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A to NJDEP on a 

monthly basis. Per your request, we are sending you a paper and electronic copy of the report for 

samples taken during July and August 2010. We will continue to send you the reports each 

month. 

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (856) 540-3015 . 

Joe Greenfield 

SHE Consultant - Environmental 

DuPont Chambers Works 

Enclosures 

CONTAINS NO CSI 
Copies to: 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room 4146 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only) 

Principal Environmental Engineer 

NJDEP Division of Water Quality 

Bureau of Point Source Permitting - Region 2 

401 E. State Street 

P.O. Box 029 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0029
#### STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, etc., Petitioner, v. CHARLES TAYLOR MARINE, INC., Respondent.

No. 39715.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 17, 1970.

Rehearing Denied July 29, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 234 So.2d 400.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and BOYD, JJ., concur.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 10
- 00411
- CR
CURTIS TYLER LUNSFOR D , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 52nd District Court Coryell County, Texas Trial Court No. FMM
- 10
- 20323

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After his jury trial on a charge of murder had begun, Curtis Lunsford changed
his not

- guilty plea to an open plea of guilty and waived his right to a jury. The trial court accepted the guilty plea and found Lunsford guilty. After a punishment hearing,
Lunsford was assessed a seventy

- five year prison sentence. Lunsford appealed, and his appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief , asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appe al is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2dLunsford v. St ate Page 2

493 (1 967)

. Although informed of h is right to do so, Lunsford did not file a pro se
response to the Anders brief

. In an Anders case, we must, “after a full examination of all the proceedings, [] decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.” Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400 ; accord Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 509

- 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)

. An appeal is “wholly frivolous” or “without merit” when it “lacks any basis in law or fact.” McCoy
v. Co urt of Appeals , 486 U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988)

. We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find this appeal to be wholly frivolous , w e affirm the judgment. C ounsel must send
Lunsford a copy of our decision by certified mail, return receipt requested, at
Lunsford ’s last known address. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 48.4 . Counsel must also notify Lunsford
of h is right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Id .; see also Ex parte Owens , 206 S.W.3d 670, 673

- 74 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) . We g rant counsel’ s motion to withdraw, effective upon counsel ’s compliance with this notificati on requirement as evidenced by

“ a letter [to this Co urt] certifying his compliance.” See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 48.4

.

REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis , and Justice Scoggins Affirmed Opini on delivered and filed March 21 , 2012 Do n ot p ublish [CRPM]
#### Elizabeth Ann VILORD, and her husband, Charles Vilord, Petitioners, v. William JENKINS, M.D., Respondent.

No. 70-265.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 16, 1970.

Robert Orseck, of Podhurst & Orseck, P. A., and J. B. Spence, of Spence, Payne & Masington, Miami, for petitioners.

William Duane Wood, III, of Ramseur, Bradham, Lyle, Skipper & Cramer, St. Petersburg, for respondent.

McNULTY, Judge.

In this pending medical malpractice action,1 plaintiff-petitioners sought to discover certain information relating to medical malpractice liability insurance owned by the defendant doctor. Further, they represented that knowledge of such information was exclusively possessed by the defendant. Notwithstanding, the trial court sustained objections to plaintiff’s discovery efforts apparently on the grounds that the information sought was irrelevant, immaterial and not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. Petitioners now seek common law certiorari to review the action of the trial court aforesaid.

At the outset, we observe that there can no longer be any doubt that the principles announced in Shingleton v. Bussey2 are applicable in medical malpractice actions.3 That is to say, a plaintiff in such an action against a doctor has a right to join the malpractice liability carrier of the doctor. This necessarily implies, of course, the right to discover the identity of such carrier so that, in one action, all interested parties may be required to “lay their cards on the table” in discovery proceedings, settlement negotiations and pretrial hearings.4 Patently, the result of the trial court’s order herein is to materially and irreparably frustrate this right. Moreover, such order was a material departure from the essential requirements of the now established law in the premises.5 We think common law cer-tiorari is therefore appropriate to grant relief.

*69Accordingly, certiorari is granted, the order under review is quashed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Certiorari granted.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.

1

. A prior appeal in this case is reported in 226 So.2d 245 (Fla.App.2nd 1969).

2

. (Fla.1969) 223 So.2d 713.

3

. *Cf.*Beta Eta House Corp. v. Gregory (Fla.1970), 237 So.2d 163. *See also*Benton v. Wickum, 233 So.2d 640 (Fla.App.4th 1970); Duran v. McPherson, 233 So.2d 639 (Fla.App.4th 1970); Beckerman v. Ujfalusy, 231 So.2d 559 (Fla.App.4th 1970); and Brown v. Williams, 236 So.2d 179 (Fla.App.2d 1970).

4

. *See,*Beta Eta House Corp. v. Gregory, *id.*and *Cf.*Durrett v. Davidson (Fla.App.2d 1970, 239 So.2d 46, Opinion filed August 19).

5

. See n. 3 *supra.*
# FILED
April 1, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JANUARY 1998 SESSION
SHERMAN SANDERS, ) also known as NEILTON E. SANDERS, ) No. 02-C-01-9701-CC-0 0027 ) APPELLANT, ) Obion County ) v. ) Honorable William B. Acree, Jr., Judge ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) (Post-Convic tion Rel ief) ) APPELLEE. )

FOR THE APPE LLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: Charles P. Roney John Knox Walkup Attorney at Law Attorney General & Repor ter P. O. Box 542 425 Fifth Avenue, North Union City, TN 38281-0542 Nashville, TN 37243-0493 Janis L. Turner Counsel for the State 425 Fifth Avenue, North Nashville, TN 37243-0493 Thomas A. Thomas District Attorney General P. O. Box 218 Union City, TN 38261-0218 James T. Cannon Assistant District A

ttorney General P. O. Box 218 Union City, TN 38261-0218

OPINION FILED:_______________________________

__ AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO R ULE 20 Joe B. Jones, Pre siding Judge



### O P I N I O NThe appellant, She rman Sanders, also known as Neilton E. Sanders (petitioner),

appeals as of right from a judgment of the tri al court dismissing his post-conviction action followingan evid entiary hearing . The tri al cour t found th e petiti oner wa s aff orded th e effective assistance guaranteed by the United States and Tenness ee Constitutions; and pleas of guilty entered by the petitioner were v oluntarily, understandi ngly, and intelligently entered. In this court, the petiti oner contends the evidence co ntained in t he record preponderatesagainst the trial cour t’s findings of fact. After a thorou gh review of t he record, the briefs submitted by the par ties, and the law gov

erning the issues presented for review, it is the opinion of this court that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed pursuantto Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Cri minal Appeals. The evidence clear ly does not preponderate against the tri al court’s findings of fact. T he petitioner and the attorney who represented the petiti oner testified at th e evidentiaryhearing. The testimony conflicts on every material fact. Their testimony cannot be reconciled. The

trial cour t accredi ted the t estimon y of the at torney. The transcript of the submission hearing suppor ts the t rial court’ s findings of fact. The transcri pt refutes parts of the petit ioner’s t estimon y.

____________________ ________________

___ _ JOE B. JONES, PRESID ING JUDGE
CONCUR:

____________________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUDGE

____________________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, JUDG E
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GREG MARTIN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 06-126 Erie

v. )

)

DR. TELEGA, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on May 31, 2006, and

was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and

recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and

Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's oral Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13], entered

on the record on July 31, 2006, recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary

Injunction and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [Doc. No. 6] be denied. The

parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of the hearing to file objections. No

objections were filed. After de novo review of the motion and documents in the case,

together with the oral Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction

and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [Doc. No. 6] is DENIED. 

The oral Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13] of Magistrate Judge Baxter,

entered on July 31, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00126-SJM-SPB Document 18 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.3****QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES****Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted****Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, John C. Abbott, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Quepasa Corporation (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) That the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: November 16, 2007   /s/ John C. Abbott       Name: John C. Abbott  Title: Chairman and    Chief Executive Officer