U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration 

June 3, 2020 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

In Reply Refer To: 

HSST-1/WZ-414 

John M. Sandy 

Traffic Safety Service 

601 Hadley Road 

South Plainfield, NJ 07080 

USA 

Dear Mr. Sandy: 

This letter is in response to your April 21, 2020 request for the Federal Highway Administration 

(FHWA) to review a roadside safety device, hardware, or system for eligibility for reimbursement 

under the Federal-aid highway program. This FHWA letter of eligibility is assigned FHWA 

control number WZ-414 and is valid until a subsequent letter is issued by FHWA that expressly 

references this device. 

Decision 

The following device is eligible within the length-of-need, with details provided in the form 

which is attached as an integral part of this letter: 

• Six-Foot A-Frame Barricade

Scope of this Letter 

To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding, new roadside safety devices should meet the crash 

test and evaluation criteria contained in the American Association of State Highway and 

Transportation Officials’(AASHTO) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). 

However, the FHWA, the Department of Transportation, and the United States Government do 

not regulate the manufacture of roadside safety devices. Eligibility for reimbursement under the 

Federal-aid highway program does not establish approval, certification or endorsement of the 

device for any particular purpose or use. 

This letter is not a determination by the FHWA, the Department of Transportation, or the United 

States Government that a vehicle crash involving the device will result in any particular 

outcome, nor is it a guarantee of the in-service performance of this device. Proper 

manufacturing, installation, and maintenance are required in order for this device to function as 

tested. 

This finding of eligibility is limited to the crashworthiness of the system and does not cover other 

structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 
 

2 

Eligibility for Reimbursement 

Based solely on a review of crash test results and certifications submitted by the manufacturer, 

and the crash test laboratory, FHWA agrees that the device described herein meets the crash test 

and evaluation criteria of the AASHTO’s MASH. Therefore, the device is eligible for 

reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program if installed under the range of tested 

conditions. 

Name of system: Six-Foot A-Frame Barricade 

Type of system: Work Zone 

Test Level: MASH Test Level 2 (TL2) 

Testing conducted by: KARCO 

Date of request: April 21, 2020 

FHWA concurs with the recommendation of the accredited crash testing laboratory on the 

attached form. 

Full Description of the Eligible Device 

The device and supporting documentation, including reports of the crash tests or other testing 

done, videos of any crash testing, and/or drawings of the device, are described in the attached 

form. 

Notice 

This eligibility letter is issued for the subject device as tested. Modifications made to the device 

are not covered by this letter. Any modifications to this device should be submitted to the user 

(i.e., state DOT) as per their requirements. 

You are expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design, installation and 

maintenance requirements to ensure proper performance. 

You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the same chemistry, 

mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for review, and that it will meet the test 

and evaluation criteria of AASHTO’s MASH.

Issuance of this letter does not convey property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege. This 

letter is based on the premise that information and reports submitted by you are accurate and 

correct. We reserve the right to modify or revoke this letter if: (1) there are any inaccuracies in 

the information submitted in support of your request for this letter, (2) the qualification testing 

was flawed, (3) in-service performance or other information reveals safety problems, (4) the 

system is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, or (5) any other 

information indicates that the letter was issued in error or otherwise does not reflect full and 

complete information about the crashworthiness of the system. 
3 

Standard Provisions 

• To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of eligibility designated as FHWA 

control number WZ-414 shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test 

documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and 

documentation may be reviewed upon request. 

• This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, 

manufacture, or sell ~any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder. 

• This FHWA eligibility letter is not an expression of any Agency view, position, or 

determination of validity, scope, or ownership of any intellectual property rights to a 

specific device or design. Further, this letter does not impute any distribution or licensing 

rights to the requester. This FHWA eligibility letter determination is made based solely 

on the crash-testing information submitted by the requester. The FHW A reserves the 

right to review and revoke an earlier eligibility determination after receipt ofsubsequent 

information related to crash testing. 

Sincerely, 

Michael S. Griffith 

Director, Office of Safety Technologies 

Office of Safety 

Enclosures 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 1 of 4 

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility 

of Highway Safety Hardware 

Submitter 

Date of Request: April 20, 2020 New Resubmission 

Name: Bruno Haesbaert 

Company: Applus IDIADA KARCOEngineering. LLC. 

Address: 9270 Holly Rd, Adelanto, CA 92301 

Country: United States of America 

To: Michael S. Griffith, Director 

FHWA, Office of Safety Technologies 

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid 

highway program. 

Device & Testing Criterion - Enter from right to left starting with Test L I 

System Type Submission Type Device Name / Variant Testing Criterion Test 

Level 

'WZ':CrashWorthyWorkZon 

PhysicalCrashTesting 

EngineeringAnalysis 

6’ A-Frame Barricade 

AASHTO MASH TL2 

! - ! - !

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I 

I I I I 

evel ! - ! - ! 

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration, I certify 

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety 

Hardware and that the evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH. 

Individual or Organization responsible for the product: 

Contact Name: John M.Sandy Same asSubmitter 

Company Name: Traffic Safety Service Same asSubmitter 

Address: 601 Hadley Road,South Plainfield, NJ 07080 Same asSubmitter 

Country: United States of America Same asSubmitter 

Enter below all disclosures of financial interests as required by the FHWA `Federal-Aid Reimbursement 

Eligibility Process for Safety Hardware Devices' document. 

Traffic Safety Service is the manufacturer and marketer of device. 

Applus IDIADA KARCOEngineering, LLC (IDIADA KARCO)isan independent research and testing laboratory 

having no affiliation with any other entity. IDIADA KARCOisactively Involved In data acquisition and 

compliance/certification testing for a variety of government agenciesand equipment manufacturers. The 

principalsandstaff of IDIADAKARCOhaveno past or present financial,contractual or organizational interest in 

anycompanyor entity directly or indirectly related to the products that KARCOtests.If anyfinancial interest 

shouldarise,other than receiving feesfor testing,reporting,etc., with respect to any project, thecompany will 

provide,In writing,a full and immediate disclosure to theFHWA. 
 

TheTrafficSafetyService6’A-FrameBarricadeisa work-zone traffic control deviceconsisting of one (1)6.0 ft. 

(1.8 m) long plastic rail and two (2) A-Frame plastic legs. The as-tested device wasa type I and weighed 

approximately24.0 lbs(10.9kg). 

TheA-Framelegsare molded from solid plasticand havean overall height of 41.0 in.(1041mm).TheA-Frame 

hasdouble pockets to allow for type I or type IIassembly.Thepocketsallow the 6.0 ft.(1.8m) rail to be inserted 

until reaching thestopperslocated on both endsof the rail.Thesestoppersare 10.5 in.(267mm) offset from 

the railendsand secure the rail in position. 

The6.0 ft.(1.8m) long plastic railaremolded from solid plasticand are10.5 in.(267mm) wide by 1.5 in.(38 

mm) thick. The rails have traffic graphic sheeting on both sidesand the barricade is easily stacked for 

transportation. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I 

  New Hardware or

Significant Modification 

~ 

I 

Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 2 of 4 

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 

A brief description of each crash test and its result: 

Modification to  Existing Hardware

CRASH TESTING 

Bysignature below, theEngineeraffiliated with the testing laboratory,agreesin support of thissubmission that 

all of the critical and relevant crash tests for this device listed above were conducted to meet the MASH test 

criteria. The Engineer has determined that no other crash testsare necessary to determine the device meets 

theMASH criteria. 

Engineer Name: Bruno Haesbaert 

Digitally signed by Bruno Haesbaert EngineerSignature: Bruno Haesbaert Date: 2020.04.21 12:40:54 -07'00' 

Address: 9270 Holly Rd, Adelanto, CA 92301 Same asSubmitter

Country: United States of America Same asSubmitter 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description 

Evaluation 

Results 

2-70 (1100C) 

Designed to evaluate the ability of asmall 

vehicle to activate any breakaway, fracture, 

or yielding mechanism. Is considered 

optional for work-zone traffic control 

devices weighing less than 220 lb (100 kg). 

The 6’ A-Frame Barricade weighed 

approximately 24.0 lbs (10.9 kg) and 

therefore the test was non-relevant and not 

conducted. 

Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 3 of 4 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description 

Evaluation 

Results 

2-71 (1100C) 

Applus IDIADA KARCOTest No. P40071-01. 

Test Date March 3, 2020. Crash Test Report 

No.TR-P40071-01-01-NCfor MASHTest 2-71 

of TrafficSafetyService6’A-Frame 

Barricade. 

Two (2) 6’ A-Frame Barricades were 

impacted on thesame test run.Thedevices 

werespaced 60.0 ft.(18.3m)apart and set 

at two (2)critical impact angles(CIA),0°and 

90°. The 1100Csmall car used for this test 

wasa2014KiaRio 4-doorsedanwith a test 

inertial weight of 2,432.8lbs(1,103.5kg). 

The test vehicle impacted the 0° testsign at 

aspeed of 43.71 mph (70.35 km/h) and 

proceeded to impacted the 90° testsign at a 

speed of 42.13 mph (67.80 km/h). Upon 

impact the 6’A-FrameBarricadebrokeaway 

in a predictable manner. The occupant 

compartment was not penetrated and the 

deformation limitswerenot exceeded. 

Debrisfrom the test articlesdid not causea 

hazard to the driver’s vision. The vehicle 

remained stable and upright throughout 

the test. The 6’ A-Frame Barricade met all 

the requirementsfor MASHTest 2-71. 

PASS 

2-72 (2270P) 

Applus IDIADA KARCOTest No. P40072-01. 

Test Date March 3, 2020. Crash Test Report 

No.TR-P40072-01-01-NCfor MASHTest 2-72 

of TrafficSafetyService6’A-Frame 

Barricade. 

Two (2) 6’ A-Frame Barricades were 

impacted on thesame test run.Thedevices 

were spaced 60.0 ft. (18.3 m) apart and set 

at two (2)critical impact angles(CIA),0°and 

90°.The2270Pvehicleusedfor this test was 

a2014RAM15004-door pick-up truck with 

a test inertial weight of 5,009.9lbs(2,272.5 

kg). 

The test vehicle impacted the 0° testsign at 

aspeed of 44.24 mph (71.20 km/h) and 

proceeded to impacted the 90° testsign at a 

speed of 43.50 mph (70.00 km/h). Upon 

impact the 6’A-FrameBarricadebrokeaway 

in a predictable manner. The occupant 

compartment was not penetrated and the 

deformation limitswerenot exceeded. 

Debrisfrom the test articlesdid not causea 

hazard to the driver’s vision. The vehicle 

remained stable and upright throughout 

the test. The 6’ A-Frame Barricade met all 

the requirementsfor MASHTest 2-72. 

PASS 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 4 of 4 

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test 

laboratory (cite the laboratory’s accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports.):

Laboratory Name: Applus IDIADA KARCOEngineering, LLC. 

Digitallysigned byBruno Haesbaert 

Date: 2020.04.21 12:41:07 -07'00' LaboratorySignature: Bruno Haesbaert

Address: 9270 Holly Rd, Adelanto, CA 92301 Same asSubmitter 

Country: United States of America Same asSubmitter 

Accreditation Certificate 

Number and Dates of current 

Accreditation period : 

TL 371: July 1, 2019 - July 1, 2022 

Haesbaert 

Digitally signed by Bruno 

SubmitterSignature*: Bruno Haesbaert Date: 2020.04.21 12:41:17 -07'00' 

ATTACHMENTS 

Attach to this form: 

1) Additional disclosures of related financial interest as indicated above. 

2) A copy of the full test report, video, and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in 

support of this request. 

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications 

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards]. For proprietary products, a single isometric line drawing is 

usually acceptable to illustrate the product, with detailed specifications, intended use, and contact 

information provided on the reverse. Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that 

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted 

to facilitate our review. 

FHWA Official Business Only: 

Eligibility Letter 

Number Date Key Words 
 

 

 

 

.. 

---=--=,,j;J~----'\,,------278'-2.5" [84.4 m]----------------,1 CIT !1,-+----1⁄4-Q------.-1 

9'-1 " [2 .8ml 

j [[JIJ 

MASH 2016 Test 2-71 Summary

0° CIA 90° CIA 

0.000 s 0.060 s 0.120 s 0.925 s 0.985 s 1.045 s

... .

.

. .

.

.

.

.

.

GENERAL INFORMATION Impact Conditions Occupant Risk

Test Agency..................................... Applus IDIADA KARCO Impact Velocity Device 1........................... 43.71 mph (70.35 km/h) Longitudinal OIV............................... N/A*

Test No..................................... P40071-01 Impact Velocity Device 2............................ 42.13 mph (67.80 km/h) Lateral OIV.................................... N/A*

Test Designation.............................. 2-71 Device 1 Angle.................................. 0.0° Longitudinal RA...........................N/A*

Test Date........................................ 3/3/20 Device 2 Angle................................. 90.0° Lateral RA.................................N/A*

Device 1 Kinetic Energy............................... 155.4 kip-ft (210.7 kJ) THIV.............................................. N/A*

TEST ARTICLE Device 2 Kinetic Energy......................... 144.3 kip-ft (195.7 kJ) PHD........................................ N/A*

Name / Model........................................ 6' A-Frame Barricade ASI.............................................. N/A*

Type....................................................... Work-Zone Device Exit Conditions

Device Height .................................... 3.4 ft. (1 m) Device 1 Exit Velocity................... 42.9 mph (69.0 km/h) Test Article Deflections

Key Elements....................................... Plastic, sign sheeting Device 2 Exit Velocity..................... 41.6 mph (67.0 km/h) 0° Sign Debris Field (longitudinal) ...121.9 ft. (37.1 m)

Road Surface.................................... Smooth, clean concrete Vehicle Resting Position................... 278.2 ft. (84.8 m) Downstream 0° Sign Debris Field (lateral)... 22.2 ft. (6.8 m)

9.1 ft. (2.8 m) Right 90° Sign Debris Field (longitudinal).. 122.0 ft. (37.2 m)

TEST VEHICLE Vehicle Stability ..................................... Satisfactory 90° Sign Debris Field (lateral)......8.9 ft. (2.7 m)

Type / Designation............................... 1100C Maximum Roll Angle................................. N/A* Vehicle Damage

Year, Make, and Model.................................. 2014 Kia Rio Maximum Pitch Angle............. N/A* Vehicle Damage Scale................... 12-FD-1

Curb Mass.............................................. 2,398.6 lbs (1,088.0 kg) Maximum Yaw Angle............N/A* CDC............................................. 12FDAW1

Test Inertial Mass.................................. 2,432.8 lbs (1,103.5 kg) * Not Applicable, device weighs less than 220 lbs (100 kg) Maximum Deformation............................ No measureable deformation

Gross Static Mass............................... 2,595.9 lbs (1,177.5 kg)

Figure 2. Summary of Test 2-71 

12 TR-P40071-01-NC 
 

 

 

 

dt--------'\;----368'-8.5" [118.5 m] 

' [: =-++-a-----------------.............+ ____ 

4'_-11~') 1.Sm] 

MASH 2016 Test 2-72 Summary

0° CIA 90° CIA 

0.000 s 0.060 s 0.120 s 0.895 s 0.955 s 1.015 s 

... .

.

. .

.

.

.

.

.

GENERAL INFORMATION Impact Conditions Occupant Risk

Test Agency..................................... Applus IDIADA KARCO Impact Velocity Device 1........................... 44.24 mph (71.20 km/h) Longitudinal OIV............................... N/A*

Test No..................................... P40072-01 Impact Velocity Device 2............................ 43.50 mph (70.00 km/h) Lateral OIV.................................... N/A*

Test Designation.............................. 2-72 Device 1 Angle.................................. 0.0° Longitudinal RA...........................N/A*

Test Date........................................ 3/3/20 Device 2 Angle................................. 90.0° Lateral RA.................................N/A*

Device 1 Kinetic Energy............................... 327.8 kip-ft (444.5 kJ) THIV.............................................. N/A*

TEST ARTICLE Device 2 Kinetic Energy......................... 316.9 kip-ft (429.6 kJ) PHD........................................ N/A*

Name / Model........................................ 6' A-Frame Barricade ASI.............................................. N/A*

Type....................................................... Work-Zone Device Exit Conditions

Device Height .................................... 3.4 ft. (1 m) Device 1 Exit Velocity................... 43.93 mph (70.7 km/h) Test Article Deflections

Key Elements....................................... Plastic, sign sheeting Device 2 Exit Velocity..................... 43.25 mph (69.6 km/h) 0° Sign Debris Field (longitudinal) ...56.3 ft. (17.1 m)

Road Surface.................................... Smooth, clean concrete Vehicle Resting Position................... 388.7 ft. (118.5 m) Downstream 0° Sign Debris Field (lateral)... 29.9 ft. (9.1 m)

4.9 ft. (1.5 m) Left 90° Sign Debris Field (longitudinal).. 146.0 ft. (44.5 m)

TEST VEHICLE Vehicle Stability ..................................... Satisfactory 90° Sign Debris Field (lateral)......4.0 ft. (1.2 m)

Type / Designation............................... 2270P Maximum Roll Angle................................. N/A* Vehicle Damage

Year, Make, and Model.................................. 2014 RAM 1500 Maximum Pitch Angle............. N/A* Vehicle Damage Scale................... 12-FD-1

Curb Mass.............................................. 4,933.9 lbs (2,238.0 kg) Maximum Yaw Angle............N/A* CDC............................................. 12FDAW1

Test Inertial Mass.................................. 5,009.9 lbs (2,272.5 kg) * Not Applicable, device weighs less than 220 lbs (100 kg) Maximum Deformation............................ No measureable deformation

Gross Static Mass............................... 5,009.9 lbs (2,272.5 kg)

Figure 2. Summary of Test 2-72 

12 TR-P40072-01-NC 
◄ ► ► 

6’ A-Frame BARRICADES Easy Set up

Easy Take down 

Efficient Storage! 

1.5” Overall Height as Shown 

41” To Top of “A” 

39.25” to Top Of Rail 

10.5” 

Rail Weight 11 LBS 

A Frame Weight 6.5 LBS 

Total Weight 24 LBS 

END VIEW OF RAIL 

OUR RAILS ARE SOLID PLASTIC, HIGH QUALITY! 

72” Rail Double Pockets for Type I or Type II 

51” Distance Between A’s 10.5” 10.5” 

The circles in this drawing represent a “stop” to keep the A’s in a fixed position 

NCHRP 350 Tested and Approved! 

Drawing is NOT to scale 601 Hadley Road, South Plainfield, Nj 07080 908-561-4800