Page 1 of 75

TENNESSEE

2019 ANNUAL REPORT
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 2 of 75

Table of Contents

Table of Contents.................................................................................................................................. 2

Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................. 3

Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 7

Program Structure................................................................................................................................. 7

Program Administration..................................................................................................................... 7

Program Methodology .....................................................................................................................12

Project Implementation .......................................................................................................................21

Funds Programmed.........................................................................................................................21

General Listing of Projects ..............................................................................................................23

Safety Performance ............................................................................................................................52

General Highway Safety Trends......................................................................................................52

Safety Performance Targets............................................................................................................58

Applicability of Special Rules...........................................................................................................63

Evaluation ...........................................................................................................................................64

Program Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................64

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements .......................................................65

Project Effectiveness.......................................................................................................................68

Compliance Assessment.....................................................................................................................71
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 3 of 75

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject 

to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other 

purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed 

in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.”

23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, 

or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety 

enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway 

crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any 

highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid 

highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court 

proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence 

at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.”
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 4 of 75

Executive Summary

Executive Summary

The Project Safety Office within the Tennessee Department of Transportation Strategic Transportation 

Investments Division (STID) maintains the management and oversight of projects within the HSIP program and 

provides a combination of the following services for the projects:

· Investigation of candidate projects

· Initiation of safety projects and initiatives

· Coordination with various stakeholders and other TDOT divisions during project development

· Provision of construction contracts for letting projects of limited scope that do not require further development.

Since its inception in 2010, STID has developed safety focused projects through various programs and 

initiatives. These projects fall under various programs that have unique data driven qualification criteria based 

on a specific condition to address a specific safety concern. A brief synopsis of each program currently active 

within STID is provided below. A total of 107 projects have been let to construction in 2018 / 2019 with another 

523 projects currently in some phase of development. A summary of the projects either let to construction from 

the program’s inception to present day or currently under development for each program is also provided 

below.

TDOT STID Programs

Program Safety Concern Addressed by Program

STID Programs Using 

HSIP Funding

Road Safety Audits (RSA) Addresses a variety of safety concerns for locations experiencing crash rates 

higher than statewide averages.

Roadway Departure Action 

Plan

Addresses segment safety concerns at FHWA identified locations that have 

experienced a high rate of roadway departure crashes.

High-Friction Surface 

Safety Initiative

Addresses safety concerns for horizontal curve locations related to the high rate 

of roadway departure crashes experienced by the location.

Local Road Safety Initiative

Addresses a variety of safety concerns for non-interstate and state route segments 

located outside an urban and MPO boundary experiencing crash rates higher than 

statewide averages.

Intersection Action Plan Addresses safety concerns at FHWA identified intersection locations that have 

experience a high number of crashes

Wrong Way Safety Initiative Addresses the potential of wrong way movements at interchange intersections at 

various interchanges

Ramp Queue Program Addresses queueing concerns of ramps spilling back onto the main travel lanes of 

the access control facilities

Pedestrian Road Safety 

Initiative Addresses safety concerns specific to pedestrian related severe crashes
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 5 of 75

STID Programs Using 

State, STP, or HSIP 

Funding

Spot Safety Program Addresses specific safety concerns identified by Regional request and approved 

by the Spot Safety Committee

STID Safety Projects Under Active Programs by Region and Funding Source

Program

# Projects 

Let 

(2018)

# Projects Currently Under Some 

Phase of Development

Construction Cost of Let 

Projects

STID Programs Using HSIP 

Funding

Region 1 8 61 $7,661,221.43

Region 2 13 64 $7,566,989.10

Region 3 13 71 $4,566,493.82

Region 4 17 50 $4,229,983.35

1Statewide 0 1 N/A

Subtotal 51 247 $24,024,687.70

STID Programs Using State, 

STP, or HSIP Funding

Region 1 16 80 $27,068,621.74

Region 2 16 77 $10,716,417.95

Region 3 15 84 $8,065,240.60

Program

# Projects 

Let 

(2018)

# Projects Currently Under Some 

Phase of Development

Construction Cost of Let 

Projects

Region 4

Statewide

19

0 

69

7 

$4,953,967.55

N/A

Subtotal 66 317 50,804,247.84

All STID Programs

Total 117 564 $74,828,935.54

1 The Wrong Way Safety Initiative and Pedestrian Road Safety Initiative are single projects that encompass 

multiple locations statewide.

STID Safety Projects by Active Program and Funding Source

Program

# Projects 

Let

(2018)

# Projects Currently Under Some 

Phase of Development

Construction Cost of Let 

Projects
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 6 of 75

STID Programs Using HSIP 

Funding

Road Safety Audits (RSA) 34 125 $16,874,333.80

Roadway Departure Action Plan 1 1 $2,168,301.00

High-Friction Surface Safety 

Initiative 0 1 N/A

Local Road Safety Initiative 3 79 $859,897.70

Intersection Action Plan 8 15 $367,529.55

Wrong Way Safety Initiative 0 1 N/A

Ramp Queue Program 1 5 $1,595,082.01

Pedestrian Road Safety Initiative

Spot Safety Program

0 

4 

6 

16

N/A

$2,159,543.64

Subtotal 51 249 $24,024,687.70

Program

# Projects 

Let

(2018)

# Projects Currently Under Some 

Phase of Development

Construction Cost of Let 

Projects

STID Programs Using State, 

STP, or HSIP Funding

Spot Safety Program

RSA

15

41

36

238

$23,470,594.58

$23,202,740.70

Subtotal 56 274 $46,673,335.28

All STID Programs

Total 107 523 $70,698,022.98

1 The Wrong Way Safety Initiative and Pedestrian Road Safety Initiative are single projects that encompass 

multiple locations statewide.

• HSIP Resurfacing $9,544,813.22 
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 7 of 75

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of 

achieving a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 

148(h) and 23 CFR 924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to 

advance HSIP implementation and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the 

HSIP Reporting Guidance dated December 29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, 

progress in implementing highway safety improvement projects, progress in achieving safety 

outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the improvements and compliance assessment.

Program Structure

Program Administration

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

Strategic Transportation Investments Division 

Programs and Initiatives

Road Safety Audits (RSA)

Addresses a variety of safety concerns for locations experiencing crash rates higher than statewide averages. 

Qualifying criteria for RSA’s applies to: 

All functionally classified public roads

Segments - Spot, Section, or Corridor

Analysis Period: three (3) years 

Length: less than 5 miles

Minimum number of crashes: five(5)

All functionally classified public roads

One (1) fatal or incapacitating injury crash and ratio of severe crash rate > 1.0, Or at least 25% lane departure 

type crashes

Intersections

Non-signalized (rural or urban)

One (1) fatal crash, or two (2) or more incapacitating crashes, or one (1) incapacitating pedestrian or bicycle 

crash 

Signalized (rural or urban)

One (1) fatal crash, or one (1) incapacitating pedestrian or bicycle crash

Non-signalized Rural Collector or Rural Local Only 

One (1) fatal and/or one (1) incapacitating injury crash

Three (3) or more crashes, or

Five (5) or more crashes with 50% other than rear end crashes

Non-signalized (Urban only)

Fifteen (15) or more crashes with 50% other than rear end crashes

Signalized

One (1) or more incapacitating angle crashes, or urban, twenty-four (24) or more crashes with 50% other than 

rear end crashes, or rural, seven (7) or more crashes with 50% other than rear end crashes
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 8 of 75

Roadway Departure Action Plan

Addresses segment safety concerns at FHWA identified locations that have experienced a high rate of 

roadway departure crashes.

Qualifying criteria:

The locations included in the RDAP were provided by FHWA and were based on crash data from the early 

2000’s. Qualification of the location was based on the number of roadway departure crashes experienced 

within the identified segments, regardless of severity.

High-Friction Surface Safety Initiative

Addresses safety concerns for horizontal curve locations related to the high rate of roadway departure crashes 

experienced by the location.

Qualifying criteria: 

Based on crash history of four (4) contiguous years. To qualify, the identified horizontal curve must have 

experienced four (4) or more lane departure related crashes within the time period analyzed.

Local Road Safety Initiative

Addresses a variety of safety concerns for non-interstate and state route segments located outside an urban 

and MPO boundary experiencing crash rates higher than statewide averages.

Qualifying criteria:

The location cannot exist within the area represented by a MPO or an urban boundary.

The location must experience a minimum of five (5) crashes with at least one (1) of the crashes classified as a 

severe crash (incapacitating injury crash or fatal crash). 

The location’s calculated severe crash rate must equal or exceed the statewide average severe crash rate for 

similar facilities. 

Intersection Action Plan

Addresses safety concerns at FHWA identified intersection locations that have experience a high number of 

crashes 

Qualifying criteria:

A candidate intersection qualifies for inclusive in the IAP if it is an un-signalized intersection that has 

experienced four (4) or more crashes during the three (3) year period analyzed. During the IAP development 

process, intersection locations were reviewed to determine if the intersection had been signalized and that the 

number of crashes at the location over the most recent three (3) year period met or exceeded the criteria 

threshold of four (4) crashes. 

Wrong Way Safety Initiative

Addresses the potential of wrong way movements at interchange intersections at various interchanges

Qualifying Criteria:
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 9 of 75

All locations considered for this program are interchange intersection locations identified by TDOT Regional 

Traffic Offices. The selection criteria used for determination of including a location are provided below. WWSI 

Qualification Criteria · Partial Cloverleaf Interchanges – known crash history involving wrong way movements. · 

Non-Partial Cloverleaf Interchanges – identification by TDOT staff as problematic locations experiencing wrong 

way movements onto the ramps.

Ramp Queue Program

Addresses queueing concerns of ramps spilling back onto the main travel lanes of the access control facilities

Qualifying criteria:

Potential ramp queue candidate projects originate from notification of queues at ramp locations made by TDOT 

Headquarter and Region personnel (either randomly or through TDOT’s Annual Queue Inspection), public 

agencies, and the traveling public. For the location to qualify for the Ramp Queue Program, photographic 

evidence of the ramp’s queue spilling back into the main travel lanes of the access controlled facility must be 

obtained by TDOT or provided by others to TDOT. It should be noted that crash related criteria is not 

associated with qualification. 

Pedestrian Road Safety Initiative

Addresses safety concerns specific to pedestrian related severe crashes

Qualifying criteria:

Qualification of a location for this program was based on historic crash data from 2013 to 2015. For inclusion 

into the program, a location must meet one (1) of the two (2) criteria provided below:

Ten (10) or more identified severe pedestrian crashes within a one (1) mile segment.

Three (3) or more identified severe pedestrian crashes occurring at an intersection.

Spot Safety Program

Addresses specific safety concerns identified by Regional request and approved by the Spot Safety Committee

Qualifying Criteria:

Candidate projects identified by a Spot Safety Request from the Regional Traffic Engineers (RTE’s) are 

evaluated on a case by case basis. All requests are presented to a Spot Safety Committee for initial approval. 

The projects initially approved by the committee must then receive final approval by the Chief Engineer prior to 

inclusion into the Spot Safety Program.

Crash related statistical data is the driving force behind the qualification of project locations for the majority of 

programs. Safety data related tasks and activities are performed by the Safety Data Section within STID. The 

primary function of the Safety Data Section are to analyze crash data to determine if a candidate location 

meets criteria for inclusion in a STID program. Additionally, the Safety Data Section processes the crash data 

transfers from the Department of Safety and Homeland Security’s Tennessee Integrated Traffic Analysis 

Network (TITAN) database into TRIMS (Tennessee Roadway Inventory Management System).

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Engineering

The HSIP program at the Tennessee Dept. of Transportation is administered by the Project Safety Office in the 
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 10 of 75

Strategic Transportation Investments Division. The Project Safety Office is staffed with a Transportation 

Manager overseeing a project safety manager and staff for each of Tennessee's 4 regions. Additionally there is 

a safety data manager and staff responsible for crash data processing and crash location analysis.

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

• SHSP Emphasis Area Data 

HSIP funds are allocated by data driven identification of roadway locations experiencing higher than normal 

crash activity and the type of activity (roadway departure, intersection, roadway friction, or wrong way drivers) 

aligns with the State's Strategic Highway Safety Plan.

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP. 

The purpose of the Local Road Safety Initiative (LRSI) is to identify and address safety concerns on local nonstate route segments located outside of an urban boundary and are not represented by Tennessee 

Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO’s). Routes considered under this program are classified as rural 

major collectors, rural minor collectors, or rural local routes. All candidate locations for this program are 

selected using a data driven process with set qualification criteria. The LRSI was originally initiated by TDOT 

Traffic Operations Division. STID assumed oversight of the program in 2015, including projects currently under 

development. 83 counties are eligible for LRSI. All routes are identified by the TDOT Project Safety Office and 

are presented to local stakeholders based on severity. Each county receives up to $300,000 construction cost 

improvements.

Criteria used for LRSI:

Most current 6 years of crash data

1 Fatal or 1 Incapacitating minimum

Total Crashes > 5 

Severe crash rate > statewide average severe crash rate

Crash rate > statewide average crash rate

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) 

Bureaus, Divisions) are involved with HSIP planning. 

• Design

• Districts/Regions

• Maintenance

• Operations

• Planning

• Traffic Engineering/Safety

Describe coordination with internal partners. 

The Strategic Transportation Investments Division Project Safety Office (PSO) works with:
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 11 of 75

• Design - to coordinate projects that may involve work outside the existing right of way and when 

implementing safety countermeasures that require a design component. 

• Districts/Regions - TDOT is divided into 4 regional offices. The PSO involves each region when an 

HSIP project is being developed in their region. 

• Traffic/Engineering & Operations - Coordinate and implement projects when signals and/or operations 

countermeasures are part of an HSIP project. 

• Planning - The Office of Community Transportation (OCT) for projects that are within an MPO/TPO and 

any rural planning organizations. 

• Maintenance - HSIP funding is used for implementing low cost safety improvements in coordination 

with resurfacing operations. 

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning. 

• Academia/University

• FHWA

• Governors Highway Safety Office

• Law Enforcement Agency

• Local Government Agency 

• Local Technical Assistance Program

• Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs)

Describe coordination with external partners. 

The Strategic Transportation Investments Division Project Safety Office (PSO) works with:

Academia/University - Assists with research projects to further develop and implement the Highway Safety 

Manual (HSM) for statewide development of Crash Modification Factors (CMF's).

FHWA - Assists with all projects that qualify for HSIP funding and oversight of the Strategic Highway Safety 

Plan (SHSP).

Tennessee Highway Safety Office - Work with to address driver behavior emphasis area of the SHSP.

Law Enforcement Agencies - Critical stakeholder of all HSIP programs. Works closely with TDOT to maintain 

quality crash data through Tennessee Integrated Traffic Analysis Network (TITAN).

Local Government Agencies - Critical stakeholder of all HSIP projects that involve a locally owned or 

maintained facility.

Regional Planning Organizations - Critical stakeholder of all HSIP programs. Tennessee has 11 Metropolitan 

Planning Organizations (MPO's) and 12 Rural Planning Organizations (RPO's). The Project Safety Office 

coordinates safety projects with these organizations when a project location falls within their jurisdiction. 

The Strategic Highway Safety Plan brings together TDOT, FHWA, TN Dept. of Safety and Homeland Security, 

TN Highway Patrol, TN Highway Safety Office, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, MPO's, TN 

Regional Safety Council, TN Transportation Assistance Program, and the American Automobile Association 

(AAA). The emphasis areas in the SHSP are directly addressed with projects developed in the HSIP program. 

The Strategic Highway Safety Plan Committee meets quarterly.
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 12 of 75

Describe other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to 

elaborate. 

Tennessee has several noteworthy practices:

1. The Road Safety Audit report is written with enough detail that the report itself is used as the construction 

plans when the project is bid out for contract. These are called “no plans contracts”.

2. Several safety projects are bundled together and let as one safety project. This allows TDOT to award 

several projects for construction at one time and receive better bid prices on the safety projects.

3. The Local Roads Safety Initiative targets safety projects on local roads in rural counties that have limited 

access to resources, only counties, or sections of counties, not represented by a MPO. The entire project, from 

road safety audit review to construction, is completed by TDOT.

4. Since 2008, HSIP funds have been used on safety improvements for resurfacing projects. Safety 

improvements include rumble strips/stripes, guardrail, shoulder widening, and the use of the Safety Edge.

5. In order to identify crash data on local roads, TDOT updated the Tennessee Roadway Identification 

Management System (TRIMS) to include local roadway data elements. This project was completed in April 

2012.

6. The Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security and the Tennessee Department of 

Transportation opened the first of its kind training facility in October 2014. The Tennessee Traffic Incident 

Management (TIM) Training Facility will be used to teach best practices for safe, quick clearance of major 

highway incidents.

7. In June 2013, the Protect the Queue campaign was started. This campaign stresses to all TDOT employees 

and partnering agencies the importance of protecting drivers caught in a traffic queue. A training program on 

the most effective queue management techniques was launched. Since the campaign started, from July 2013 

to December 2013 showed a 19% reduction in secondary incidents over the same period in 2012. This 

equates into 20 fewer secondary incidents, and could possibly represent up to four (4) lives saved. TDOT’s 12 

districts dispatch specially equipped “Protect the Queue” (PTQ) trucks when advised of non-recurring traffic 

queues caused by construction,maintenance, special events, or roadway incidents.

8. The Highway Safety Improvement Program Evaluation Project received a 2017 National Roadway Safety 

Award.

Program Methodology

Does the State have an HSIP manual or similar that clearly describes HSIP planning, 

implementation and evaluation processes? 

Yes

FileName:

STID Program Description 100617.pdf

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP. 

• Intersection

• Local Safety

• Pedestrian Safety
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 13 of 75

• Roadway Departure

• Wrong Way Driving

• Other-Ramp Queue

• Other-High-friction Surface Safety Initiative

Program: Intersection

Date of Program Methodology:5/1/2015

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic 

Volume Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Crash rate

• Critical rate

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-The projects are developed for all locations that meet the criteria for the IAP.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding:1
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 14 of 75

Other-Ranking based on severity.:2

Program: Local Safety

Date of Program Methodology:3/1/2016

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only 

Traffic 

Volume 

Lane miles 

Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Crash rate

• Critical rate

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-The projects are developed for all locations that meet the criteria for the LRSI program.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding:1

Other-Based on severity:2
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 15 of 75

Program: Pedestrian Safety

Date of Program Methodology:2/6/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Other-pedestrian crashes Traffic 

Volume 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Crash rate

• Critical rate

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-The projects are developed for all locations that meet the criteria for the PRSI program. 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Program: Roadway Departure

Date of Program Methodology:5/1/2010

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 16 of 75

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes Traffic 

Volume 

Functional classification 

Roadside features 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Crash rate

• Critical rate

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-The projects are developed for all locations that meet the criteria for the RDAP program.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding:1

Other-Ranking based on severity:2

Program: Wrong Way Driving

Date of Program Methodology:7/21/2015

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 17 of 75 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Other-Wrong way crashes 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Probability of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-The projects are developed for all locations that meet the criteria.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding:1

Other-Ranked based on severity.:2

Program: Other-Ramp Queue

Date of Program Methodology:11/1/2008

What is the justification for this program? 

What is the funding approach for this program? 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Other-The intent of this program is to 

identiify locations where the queue 

extends onto the mainline. 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Level of service of safety (LOSS)
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 18 of 75

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-As projects are identified.

• Other-Projects are identified by TDOT Regional Traffic Engineers.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding:1

Other-Ramp queue projects are initiated when it is verified by the Regional Traffic Engineer the ramp 

queue backs up onto the mainline on the interstate.:2

Program: Other-High-friction Surface Safety Initiative

Date of Program Methodology:5/14/2013

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

• FHWA focused approach to safety

• Other-EDC 2 Initiative

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Other-Lane Departure 

Traffic 

Volume 

Horizontal curvature 

Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 19 of 75

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-The projects are developed for all locations that meet the criteria for the HSSI program.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding:1

Other-Number of Crashes:2

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements? 

 30

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic improvements? 

• High friction surface treatment

• Horizontal curve signs

• Install/Improve Pavement Marking and/or Delineation

• Install/Improve Signing

• Other-Stop controlled intersections

• Rumble Strips

• Wrong way driving treatments

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

• Crash data analysis

• High friction surface treatment

• Wrong way driving treatments

• Other-Road Safety audit Review

• Other-Stop controlled intersections

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

No

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts? 

Yes
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 20 of 75

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts. 

For the past 3 years TDOT has been working to understand and adopt Highway Safety Manual processes. 

TDOT has attended peer exchanges in an effort to understand how other states are implementing the HSM.

TDOT has a research project underway with the University of Tennessee and Tennessee State University to 

develop SPF's.

TDOT used the Highway Safety Manual to evaluate previously completed HSIP projects.

The FHWA Office of Safety developed a TDOT DDSA implementation plan with input from TDOT. The plan is 

currently under revision to fit TDOT's purposes.

The goals set forth in the plan are:

Goal 1: Develop improved analyses in a formal safety management process.

Goal 2: Support, expand, and formalize TDOT’s data governance over safety data.

Goal 3: Develop data driven safety analyses supporting Roadway Design Division activities and design-related 

STID analysis and reporting.

Goal 4: Incorporate data driven safety analyses in other TDOT business processes.
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 21 of 75

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for HSIP funding. 

State Fiscal Year

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category. 

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % 

OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $62,774,938 $40,813,935 65.02%

HRRR Special Rule (23 

U.S.C. 148(g)(1))

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

154)

$10,293,173 $9,689,339 94.13%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

164)

$4,822 $0 0%

RHCP (for HSIP 

purposes) (23 U.S.C. 

130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds 

(i.e. STBG, NHPP)

$7,310,802 $7,310,802 100%

State and Local Funds $8,875,060 $8,875,060 100%

Totals $89,258,795 $66,689,136 74.71%

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal 

safety projects?

$9,398,550

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects? 

$9,398,550

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$236,000

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$236,000

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas 

during the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126? 

0%
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 22 of 75

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during 

the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126? 

0%

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in 

the future. 

None
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 23 of 75

General Listing of Projects

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period. 

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

NH/HSIP61(47)Roadway 2.28 Miles $53807 $53807 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther18,026 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP116(26)Roadway 9 Miles $80400 $80400 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,890 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP61(43)Roadway 3.58 Miles $30416.47 $30416.47 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther12,095 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP71(41)Roadway Miles $57420 $63800 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-64(25) Roadway 2.25 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,820 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP64(24)Roadway 2.51 Miles $20859 $20859 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 4,313 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP64(23)Roadway 0.890000000000001 Miles $151986 $168875 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 6,880 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP16(60)Roadway 2.16 Miles $106799 $118666 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 8,760 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP10(74)Roadway 8.31 Miles $65999 $65999 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther2,400 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP147(10)Roadway 2.6 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 530 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP30(83)Roadway 2.94 Miles $31346 $31346 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 1,695 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP1216(11)Roadway 0.548999999999999 Miles $40500 $45000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Collector 4,280 45 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP33(102)Roadway 0.57 Miles $188550 $209500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Collector 13,600 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 24 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

NH/HSIP73(70)Roadway 4.5 Miles $195129 $216810 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther22,182 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP500(44)Roadway Miles $7200 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-PHSIP115(53)Roadway 0.0999999999999996 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Principal ArterialOther42,470 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

NH/HSIP73(71)Roadway 4.8 Miles $195930 $217700 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther23,066 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP335(7)Roadway 3.48 Miles $120700 $120700 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 8,560 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP1275(10)Roadway 1.776 Miles $40500 $45000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 5,700 45 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-PHSIP33(115)Roadway 0.0600000000000005 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Minor Arterial 13,600 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

R-NH/HSIP35(63)Roadway 2.61 Miles HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther24,285 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-PHSIP33(114)Roadway 0 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP306(11)Roadway 8.58 Miles $71469 $71469 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,227 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP312(15)Roadway 5.27 Miles $46823 $46823 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,750 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP60(34)Roadway 4.71 Miles $25275 $28085 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther9,970 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP311(32)Roadway 0.0199999999999996 Miles $13410 $13410 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther35,290 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP9(95)Roadway 4.62 Miles $12357 $13730 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther22,438 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 25 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP-146(7) Roadway 9.51 Miles $3851.19 $3851.19 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,267 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP1(379)Roadway 0.37 Miles $8049.67 $8945.19 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther14,480 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-HSIP145(4)Roadway 3.57 Miles $954.86 HSIP (23

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,000 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-1(393) Roadway 1.35 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther14,875 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-22(92) Roadway 1.733 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther8,170 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-22(91) Roadway 5.95 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther9,390 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP76(112)Roadway 3 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,330 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP900(40)Roadway Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP91(40)Roadway 4.13 Miles $66590 $66590 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 10,400 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP1000(29)Roadway Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-250(8) Roadway 7.65 Miles $22523 $22523 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,535 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP249(89)Roadway 2.78 Miles $85995 $95550 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 6,570 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP249(88)Roadway 9.49 Miles $77847 $77847 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,733 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

PHSIP100(68)Roadway 0.0999999999999996 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23

U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,220 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 26 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

STP/HSIP100(85)Roadway 7.78 Miles $69300 $69300 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,325 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP32(94)Roadway 2.23 Miles $35335 $35335 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther20,420 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP32(89)Roadway 2.09 Miles $3066.4 $3066.4 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther17,780 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-53(55) Roadway 3.42 Miles $14842 $14842 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,630 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-HSIP9(88)Roadway 4.29 Miles $5460.61 $5460.61 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,280 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-I-24-

2(156)

Roadway 3 Miles $178605 $198450 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate48,510 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP2(265)Roadway 7.33 Miles $5317 $5317 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,705 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP2(252)Roadway 3.86 Miles $246000 $273333 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 15,256 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP1600(20)Roadway Miles $6750 $7500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP2(266)Roadway 12.55 Miles $33045 $33045 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,868 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-NH/HSIP16(53)Roadway 2.32 Miles HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther19,920 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-20(74) Roadway 2.4 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther10,895 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP54(42)Roadway 11.36 Miles $8475 $8475 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,496 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP1(401)Roadway 4.11 Miles $24028 $24028 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 8,413 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 27 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP1800(39)Roadway Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP101(25)Roadway 9.12 Miles $906.6 $906.6 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,825 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP28(72)Roadway 3.71 Miles $36087 $36087 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther6,793 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-1(391) Roadway 3.5 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,115 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP1(403)Roadway 5.19 Miles $71872 $71872 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther7,950 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-65(18) Roadway 5 Miles $55764 $61960 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther11,280 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-I-24-

1(110)

Roadway 1.05 Miles $278100 $309000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate173,090 70 State 

Highway

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-65(22) Roadway 0.69 Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther25,676 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-I-440-

4(83)

Roadway 7.66 Miles $6883.44 $7648.27 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate98,101 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-I-440-

4(81)

Roadway 0.39 Miles $35788.16 $39764.62 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate103,690 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-I-65-

2(98)

Roadway 0.0100000000000007 Miles $869736 $966373 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate131,870 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STPNH/HSIP11(88)Roadway 1.99 Miles $4430.31 $4430.31 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther22,080 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-11(93) Roadway 0.0199999999999996 Miles $143484 $159426 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther31,310 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP112(41)Roadway 5.43 Miles $26770 $26770 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 8,373 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 28 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP-I-440-

4(80)

Roadway 0.2 Miles $13705.45 $15228.28 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate83,050 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP100(88)Roadway 3.82 Miles $21903 $21903 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther18,135 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-I-65-

2(102)

Roadway 0.78 Miles $514489 $571654 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther50,810 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-45(28) Roadway 0.0599999999999987 Miles $28600 $71500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther50,350 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP-12(60) Roadway 1.88 Miles $33548 $33548 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther7,910 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-I-24-

1(109)

Roadway 0.25 Miles $102732 $114147 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate167,410 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-65(23) Roadway 0.4 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther24,340 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP2000(19)Roadway 3 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 210 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP2000(18)Roadway Miles $7290 $8100 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-NH20(75)Roadway 3.15 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,580 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-20(61) Roadway 0.0100000000000002 Miles $74160 $82400 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,580 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP-53(47) Roadway 5.17 Miles $707.61 $707.61 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,105 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-26(72) Roadway 7.98 Miles $17950 $17950 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,180 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP2100(27)Roadway Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 29 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

STP/HSIP146(8)Roadway 5.47 Miles $40172 $40172 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,873 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-PHSIP26(62)Roadway 6.26 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,820 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-47(11) Roadway 2.28 Miles $30046 $33384 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,435 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-1(385) Roadway 6.7 Miles $2764.14 $2764.14 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 10,142 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP1(360)Roadway 3.486 Miles $5723.66 $6359.29 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther12,780 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-46(35) Roadway 9.1 Miles $50655 $56283 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,132 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP/HRRR46(22)Roadway 0.00999999999999979 Miles $17517.02 $19463.35 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,570 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP/HRRR46(22)Roadway 0.00999999999999979 Miles $17517.02 $19463.35 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,570 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP1(404)Roadway 7.847 Miles $114275 $126972 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 6,880 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP2200(17)Roadway Miles $4950 $5500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP2300(43)Roadway Miles $306052 $306752 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-826(5) Roadway 1 Miles $76500 $77000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 1,200 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STPNH/HSIP20(69)Roadway 8.1 Miles $40698 $40698 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther11,760 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-78(21) Roadway 0.04 Miles $74700 $83000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther6,580 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

NH/HSIP20(73)Roadway 4.26 Miles $46825 $46825 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther11,000 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP196(14)Roadway 7.19 Miles $21600.58 $21600.58 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,236 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-57(76) Roadway 3.1 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 6,720 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-18(29) Roadway 0.4 Miles $35000 $35000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,330 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP-16(59) Roadway 4.38 Miles $49455 $49455 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther11,730 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP156(15)Roadway 4.69 Miles $28119 $28119 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 960 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP50(60)Roadway 1.74 Miles $972.39 $1081.99 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,142 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP2600(45)Roadway Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP50(63)Roadway 4.2 Miles $41935 $41935 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,065 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

PHSIP/NHSIP-15(185)Roadway 0.579999999999998 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,290 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP1588(10)Roadway 3.86 Miles $465844 $501876 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 1,050 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP5(113)Roadway 7.35 Miles $55701 $61890 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther10,180 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP76(104)Roadway 2.19 Miles $35810 $39788 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther5,633 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP43(44)Roadway 6.88 Miles $80181 $89090 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther15,185 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 31 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP-5(114) Roadway 0.0199999999999996 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,770 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

NH/HSIP5(115)Roadway 1.16 Miles $65100 $65100 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther14,990 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP11(95)Roadway 11.28 Miles $1202.47 $1202.47 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,393 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP273(15)Roadway 7.84 Miles $65583 $65583 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 942 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP245(10)Roadway 6.67 Miles $40461 $40461 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 750 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP7(33)Roadway 1.897 Miles $3242.9 $3242.9 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,180 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP15(190)Roadway 6.56 Miles $77367 $77367 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther7,630 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-7(36) Roadway 1.537 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,180 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-1(380) Roadway 6.06 Miles $12150 $13500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 7,950 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP32(95)Roadway 5.53 Miles $82293 $91436 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther17,210 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-70(27) Roadway 10.07 Miles $29010 $29010 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 1,647 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP34(119)Roadway 4.49 Miles $130730 $130730 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther15,037 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-70(31) Roadway 0.23 Miles $9000 $10000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 7,410 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP93(21)Roadway 8.04 Miles $116.1 $116.1 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,295 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 32 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP-70(26) Roadway 6.46 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 8,916 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP351(21)Roadway 4.51 Miles $10372.59 $10372.59 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,520 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP34(100)Roadway 0.00999999999999979 Miles $964044 $1071160 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther18,120 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP3000(57)Roadway 1.323 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Local Road or 

Street

0 30 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-56(90) Roadway 5.5 Miles $36097 $36097 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,890 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP56(83)Roadway 6.24 Miles $10423.05 $10423.05 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,605 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP34(105)Roadway 0.01 Miles $271800 $302000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther24,830 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP-58(53) Roadway 0.799999999999999 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther23,700 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP153(11)Roadway 1.78 Miles $29316.98 $32575.87 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

48,556 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP2207(10)Roadway 4.3 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 5,885 40 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP2(258)Roadway 1.99 Miles $24388 $27098 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther26,674 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

NH/HSIP2(264)Roadway 1.69 Miles $53581 $59534 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther11,990 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-58(52) Roadway 2.17 Miles $115787 $128650 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 7,500 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-58(45) Roadway 0.520000000000001 Miles $1630425 $1811583 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther12,675 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 33 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP-2(268) Roadway 0.45 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 11,306 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP319(15)Roadway 0.550000000000001 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther30,475 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-8(57) Roadway 0.91 Miles $9000 $10000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther10,960 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP18(33)Roadway 13.59 Miles $482912 $536570 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther5,905 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-PHSIP15(186)Roadway 4.22 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Principal ArterialOther10,302 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-57(74) Roadway 5.62 Miles $42000 $42000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,265 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP3600(37)Roadway Miles $4271.04 $4271.04 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP142(18)Roadway 4.502 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,625 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP69(96)Roadway 6.16 Miles $14985 $16649 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 575 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP114(14)Roadway 2.84 Miles $3687.31 $3687.31 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther2,320 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-66(53) Roadway 7.36 Miles $122080 $122080 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 8,994 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-1(351) Roadway 1.3 Miles $451341 $501490 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther26,675 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP346(11)Roadway 10.25 Miles $32270 $32270 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,160 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-1(394) Roadway 4.72 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther13,473 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 34 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP-1(398) Roadway 6.28 Miles $99270 $110300 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther1,475 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-1(392) Roadway 5 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,700 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP22(87)Roadway 3.63 Miles $18000 $20000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther8,815 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP200(41)Roadway 5.136 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 696 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP104(42)Roadway 9.2 Miles $54100 $54100 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,990 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP201(10)Roadway 4.6 Miles $41580 $46200 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 165 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

PHSIP100(69)Roadway 0.0999999999999996 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,960 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP4000(44)Roadway Miles $348465 $349195 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-54(44) Roadway 4.8 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,600 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-R54(40)Roadway 0.01 Miles $261900 $291000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Local Road or 

Street

0 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-69(99) Roadway 5 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,353 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-438(8) Roadway 7 Miles $76671 $76671 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 560 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP232(17)Roadway 2.35 Miles $13104 $13104 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 240 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP49(44)Roadway 7.58 Miles $42792.09 $42792.09 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,475 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 35 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

STP/HSIP13(71)Roadway 6.85 Miles $17880.32 $17880.32 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,130 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-13(55) Roadway 6.52 Miles $676.33 $676.33 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,715 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-PHSIP1(330)Roadway 1.59 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor Arterial 7,830 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIPR00S(440)Roadway Miles $9000 $10000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP290(8)Roadway 10.58 Miles $1612 $1612 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 464 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP53(53)Roadway 9.58 Miles $21183 $21183 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 2,355 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP34(120)Roadway 7.72 Miles $60180 $60180 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 15,140 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP34(106)Roadway 0.5 Miles $47700 $53000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther23,550 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP113(24)Roadway 0.17 Miles $43200 $48000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,865 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP-67(32) Roadway 0.5 Miles $235497 $439445 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,860 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP/PHSIP4600(25)Roadway Miles HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-9(76) Roadway 0.0100000000000002 Miles $413100 $459000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther26,150 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

PHSIP1053(3)Roadway 0.37 Miles $0 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Minor Arterial 23,725 30 City or 

Municipal

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

RPHSIP/HSIP131(40)Roadway 0.239999999999998 Miles $2742824 $3279431 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 11,980 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 36 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

PHSIP-I-75-

3(171)

Roadway 0.1 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate81,900 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-NH/HSIP1(357)Roadway 1.77 Miles $182.38 $228.23 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther25,400 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP62(47)Roadway 1.15 Miles $10426.53 $11585.03 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther40,740 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-I-640-

7(171)

Roadway 0.26 Miles $143100 $159000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate58,500 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-I140(17)Roadway 0.00999999999999979 Miles $3993480 $4437200 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate48,710 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP9(102)Roadway 0.92 Miles $23400 $23400 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther35,760 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-71(33) Roadway 0.98 Miles $738450 $820500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther30,020 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-PHSIP33(111)Roadway 0.44 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Minor Arterial 5,880 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-78(23) Roadway 4.3 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,445 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-78(24) Roadway 3.59 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,720 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP88(18)Roadway 6.67 Miles $153614 $153614 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 730 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP4900(65)Roadway Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HRRR4900(67)Roadway 1.577 Miles $36000 $40000 HRRR 

Special Rule 

(23 U.S.C. 

148(g)(1))

Rural Local Road or 

Street

0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-3(133) Roadway 0.00999999999999979 Miles $176400 $196000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther9,900 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 37 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

STP/HSIP209(16)Roadway 4.09 Miles $91035 $101150 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,290 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STPNH/HSIP6(131)Roadway 4.91 Miles $52618 $52618 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther6,850 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-6(108) Roadway 0.16 Miles $51951 $57723 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther21,125 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP242(173)Roadway 11.81 Miles $10280 $10280 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 535 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP6(121)Roadway 4.738 Miles $793.51 $793.51 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther8,835 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP20(66)Roadway 5.67 Miles $34998.79 $34998.79 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther3,766 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-48(54) Roadway 5.56 Miles $16049.93 $17833.37 HSIP (23

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,915 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP10(78)Roadway 2.43 Miles $52888 $58765 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther21,090 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-110(5) Roadway 1.15 Miles $54330 $54830 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,840 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP50(65)Roadway 8.5 Miles $129590 $129590 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,815 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-444(6) Roadway 11.02 Miles $243600 $243600 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 6,930 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-72(19) Roadway 5.82 Miles $49090 $49090 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,140 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

PHSIP1247(2)Roadway 0.1 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Minor Arterial 7,650 30 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

STP/HSIP324(10)Roadway 2.17 Miles $64600 $64600 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 7,420 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 38 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP-73(62) Roadway 4.86 Miles $896220 $995800 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther12,890 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-52(84) Roadway 0.33 Miles $279693 $310769 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther8,980 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-52(78) Roadway 0.00999999999999979 Miles $64800 $72000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther15,470 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP223(12)Roadway 3.76 Miles $68891 $86114 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 4,530 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP5(112)Roadway 1.9 Miles $62335 $62335 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther31,220 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

PHSIP20(57)Roadway 0.0999999999999996 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Principal ArterialOther14,970 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

STP/HSIP377(1)Roadway 1.19 Miles $22966 $22966 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,210 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-2(262) Roadway 1.6 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 5,120 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP156(14)Roadway 2.98 Miles $15440 $15440 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 570 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP2(267)Roadway 10.88 Miles $82688 $82688 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,605 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP156(13)Roadway 7.64 Miles $33876 $33876 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,340 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-50(67) Roadway 4.4 Miles $25494 $25494 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 7,110 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STPNH/HSIP99(50)Roadway 7.07 Miles $15307.83 $15307.83 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther15,655 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP9323(3)Roadway 0.447 Miles $1978232 $2198036 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Local Road or 

Street

0 30 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 39 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

NH/HSIP99(58)Roadway 4.48 Miles $94780 $105313 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther10,050 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-246(5) Roadway 7.99 Miles $60114 $60114 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,355 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP245(9)Roadway 6.33 Miles $26251.03 $26251.03 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,236 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-2(270) Roadway 1.38 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,820 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP307(14)Roadway 3.89 Miles $63141 $63541 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,943 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-163(9) Roadway 1.6 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,865 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP3674(10)Roadway 0.1 Miles $562569 $604351 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 3,100 30 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP-2(232) Roadway 8.27 Miles $193884 $194484 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 7,163 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-39(16) Roadway 1.78 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,080 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-39(17) Roadway 2.95 Miles $12984 $12984 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 6,055 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP2(263)Roadway 2.62 Miles $24710 $27456 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther10,856 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP5400(42)Roadway Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-5(111) Roadway 1.75 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther10,570 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-NH/HSIP60(32)Roadway 2.1 Miles HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther5,610 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 40 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

R-STPNH/HSIP33(124)Roadway 1.87 Miles $1126.49 $1126.49 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther15,015 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP1202(2)Roadway 11.2 Miles $349000 $349000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 1,430 45 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP112(34)Roadway 0.220000000000001 Miles $404100 $449000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 20,403 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP112(38)Roadway 4.44 Miles $156694.6 $174104.67 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 18,196 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-76(94) Roadway 3.1 Miles $18000 $20000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther23,013 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

PHSIP/HSIP48(51)Roadway 0.210000000000001 Miles HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 1,520 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

PHSIP/HSIP76(89)Roadway 0.100000000000001 Miles $620.1 $620.1 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther22,830 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP-13(58) Roadway 0.5 Miles $143311 $159235 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther23,240 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP12(58)Roadway 4.25 Miles $55831 $62034 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther37,885 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-NH374(17)Roadway 0.6 Miles $13707.85 $15231.16 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther16,620 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

NH/HSIP374(18)Roadway 4.5 Miles $79000 $87779 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther15,530 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP48(59)Roadway 2.7 Miles $4776 $4776 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 17,660 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STPNH/HSIP50(64)Roadway 3.45 Miles $45100 $45100 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,133 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP299(11)Roadway 10.14 Miles $76914.97 $76914.97 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,787 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 41 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

NH/HSIP3(137)Roadway 1.81 Miles $763.48 $763.48 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther18,636 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-89(20) Roadway 8.48 Miles $36574.11 $40637.9 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 990 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP6600(24)Roadway Miles $5400 $6000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP3(153)Roadway 5.96 Miles $2765 $2765 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther13,100 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP184(5)Roadway 0.880000000000001 Miles $3698.68 $3698.68 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 3,980 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP111(98)Roadway 0.0900000000000003 Miles $2231654 $2479614 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther15,660 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP164(5)Roadway 5 Miles $1920 $1920 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 620 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP111(110)Roadway 0.5 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther7,090 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-85(25) Roadway 5.63 Miles $656.56 $656.56 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,136 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-13(80) Roadway 5.77 Miles $29363 $29363 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,950 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP438(7)Roadway 8.66 Miles $30030 $30030 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 630 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP100(86)Roadway 4.09 Miles $13535 $13535 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 615 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STPNH/HSIP40(41)Roadway 3.22 Miles $45454 $50504 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,375 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP7000(29)Roadway Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 42 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP-30(84) Roadway 5.1 Miles $84032 $84032 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 740 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP136(19)Roadway 2.85 Miles $595478 $661643 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther10,428 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP135(18)Roadway 0.0999999999999996 Miles $316571 $351746 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 10,630 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

R-STP/HSIP24(65)Roadway 2.5 Miles HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther8,280 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP62(48)Roadway 5.12 Miles $6184 $6184 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,650 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIPREG4(151)Roadway Miles $19000 $19000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIPREG4(144)Roadway Miles $26000 $26000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIPREG4(150)Roadway Miles $2420716 $2436716 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIPREG4(149)Roadway Miles $52000 $52000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIPREG4(146)Roadway Miles $65000 $65000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIPREG4(145)Roadway Miles $58000 $58000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIPREG4(143)Roadway Miles $52000 $52000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIPREG4(133)Roadway Miles $40000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIPREG4(142)Roadway Miles $55000 $55000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Spot Intersections Infrastructure

NH/HSIP29(106)Roadway 2.4 Miles $22500 $25000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther19,250 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP29(113)Roadway 1.63 Miles $78865 $87628 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther18,960 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 43 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP-30(70) Roadway 0.41 Miles $2779774 $3088638 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 5,690 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-30(66) Roadway 3.65 Miles $95699 $95699 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,980 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP7200(31)Roadway Miles $7200 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-PHSIP1(329)Roadway 0.0999999999999996 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Minor Arterial 14,260 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

STP/HSIP1(363)Roadway 2.78 Miles $10559.77 $10559.77 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,530 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP29(110)Roadway 1.57 Miles $29898 $33220 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 11,270 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP1(399)Roadway 2.7 Miles $117250 $117250 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 12,895 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-I-40-

6(162)

Roadway 0.71 Miles $73260 $81400 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate33,840 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP29(100)Roadway 4.4 Miles $8825.92 $8825.92 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,820 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP11(105)Roadway 5.02 Miles $63096 $70109 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther18,180 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP25(52)Roadway 5.82 Miles $2303.77 $2303.77 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,557 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP49(51)Roadway 6.18 Miles $143617 $159574 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 9,122 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP76(110)Roadway 6.55 Miles $162670 $180744 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 13,754 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-PHSIP76(91)Roadway 0.6 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Minor Arterial 14,630 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 44 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP-25(49) Roadway 0.4 Miles $72900 $81000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,090 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

STP/HSIP2(251)Roadway 7.68 Miles $17899.41 $17899.41 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,210 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP10(77)Roadway 3.41 Miles $211383 $234870 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther38,563 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP266(27)Roadway 0.4 Miles $20579 $22865 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 22,900 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP102(16)Roadway 5 Miles $32541 $33041 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 9,366 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP102(17)Roadway 1.82 Miles $24518 $24518 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 21,870 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP1(369)Roadway 3.4 Miles $31667.65 $31667.65 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther26,060 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP96(54)Roadway 4.01 Miles $11712 $13014 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 15,924 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-STP/HSIP266(25)Roadway 4.65 Miles HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 11,455 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-16(61) Roadway 6.52 Miles $57993 $64437 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,097 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP29(112)Roadway 6.1 Miles $29100 $29100 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther3,320 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP63(64)Roadway 2.63 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 9,630 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STPNH/HSIP28(73)Roadway 0.41 Miles $10773 $10773 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,980 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-8(56) Roadway 2.68 Miles $91032 $101147 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther15,125 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 45 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

STP/HSIP73(69)Roadway 6.55 Miles $56700 $56700 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 9,070 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-338(8) Roadway 11.54 Miles $79074 $87860 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 7,476 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-PHSIP338(7)Roadway 0.05 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Minor Arterial 11,760 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP-339(8) Roadway 5.74 Miles $32040 $35600 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,700 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP71(38)Roadway 3.57 Miles $131580 $146200 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther50,363 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-3(154) Roadway 0.530000000000001 Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 16,210 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

NH/HSIP177(38)Roadway 2.98 Miles $114282 $126981 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther51,655 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP4188(10)Roadway 3.27 Miles $200885 $207172 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 3,620 40 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP2823(4)Roadway 0.00999999999999979 Miles $454000 $454000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 6,960 50 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP-I-40-

1(344)

Roadway 0.240000000000002 Miles $117450 $130500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate152,610 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP2814(6)Roadway 0.1 Miles $74700 $83000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 14,210 40 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP-803(9) Roadway 0.220000000000001 Miles $76669 $78278 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 20,830 40 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP14(52)Roadway 3.47 Miles $41108.36 $45676.29 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther31,090 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 46 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP2875(4)Roadway 0.41 Miles $18000 $20000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther34,170 45 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STPNH/HSIP4(10)Roadway 2.19 Miles $21990.89 $24434.76 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther28,355 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-1(339) Roadway 0.62 Miles $636300 $707000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther16,810 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP175(26)Roadway 1.97 Miles $109611 $121790 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 11,670 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP57(69)Roadway 2.57 Miles $325000 $325000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther43,526 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP385(31)Roadway 6.3 Miles $150938 $150938 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

47,950 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP1(368)Roadway 4.56 Miles $45000 $50000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther25,283 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-3(146) Roadway 3.38 Miles $414000 $460000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther20,623 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP385(32)Roadway 5.82 Miles $79380 $79380 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther13,507 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP1(342)Roadway 0.99 Miles $7830 $8700 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther14,235 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP53(56)Roadway 4.62 Miles $80699 $80699 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 10,585 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP263(11)Roadway 5.12 Miles $8239 $9155 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,180 35 State

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP263(10)Roadway 5.12 Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,180 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP9900(118)Roadway Miles $140400 $156000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 47 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP9900(119)Roadway Miles $45000 $50000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP9900(93)Roadway Miles $27000 $30000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP76(109)Roadway 5.72 Miles $48363 $48363 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther9,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-76(97) Roadway 0.0999999999999996 Miles $127625 $141805 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther9,820 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

R-PHSIP36(55)Roadway 0.100000000000001 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Principal ArterialOther31,150 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

STP/HSIP126(24)Roadway 6.34 Miles $46197 $51330 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 6,773 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-93(18) Roadway 0.180000000000001 Miles $69900 $69900 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 17,390 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP8200(31)Roadway 2.948 Miles $13500 $15000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 1,670 35 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-36(62) Roadway 0.559999999999999 Miles $64476 $71639 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 17,110 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP93(22)Roadway 1.91 Miles $38529 $42810 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther13,400 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP4871(10)Roadway 0.54 Miles $69197 $69697 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 7,070 40 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP258(13)Roadway 5.45 Miles $516.5 $573.44 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 8,475 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP386(21)Roadway 1.89 Miles $13000 $13000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

74,733 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-25(48) Roadway 4.3 Miles $86630 $86630 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 10,810 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 48 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

STP/HSIP25(60)Roadway 3.03 Miles $159372 $177079 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 12,894 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP174(28)Roadway 10.02 Miles $113892 $113892 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,295 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP806(10)Roadway 4.44 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Local Road or 

Street

0 40 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP8400(82)Roadway Miles $265746 $266246 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

PHSIP3(131)Roadway 0.0999999999999996 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Urban Principal ArterialOther20,410 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

NH/HSIP3(152)Roadway 3.39 Miles $290700 $323000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther16,335 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-59(28) Roadway 8.73 Miles $48300 $48300 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,715 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-10(79) Roadway 4.68 Miles $34806 $34806 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,995 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-144(4) Roadway 5.03 Miles $24390 $24390 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,550 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP131(45)Roadway 4.68 Miles $13402.64 $13402.64 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,036 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP111(108)Roadway 1.74 Miles $56756 $56756 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther5,540 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP/PHSIP8800(10)Roadway Miles HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP8800(12)Roadway Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP8(51)Roadway 4.17 Miles $445.25 $445.25 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,440 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP55(25)Roadway 3.67 Miles $1799 $1799 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther10,745 55 State

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 49 of 75 

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

HSIP-1(375) Roadway 0.0999999999999979 Miles $53897 $54897 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther6,790 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP8900(39)Roadway Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP287(11)Roadway 4.15 Miles $2259.11 $2259.11 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,605 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-1(387) Roadway 0.0999999999999979 Miles $54322 $55322 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther6,790 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Infrastructure

HSIP287(13)Roadway 4.85 Miles $9233 $9233 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,370 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP108(96)Roadway 8.64 Miles $3018.22 $3352.79 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,743 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP34(118)Roadway 6.85 Miles $197730 $219700 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther25,157 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP9000(49)Roadway Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-93(11) Roadway 4.08 Miles $2622 $2622 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther3,830 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP228(22)Roadway 5.03 Miles $20843 $20843 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 340 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-13(79) Roadway 8.86 Miles $54858 $60953 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 3,125 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP13(78)Roadway 4.7 Miles $18375 $18375 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,983 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP118(10)Roadway 14.48 Miles $80588.23 $80588.23 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,296 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP431(14)Roadway 4.05 Miles $2704.25 $2704.25 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,433 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 50 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

NH/HSIP43(43)Roadway 3.54 Miles $112770 $112770 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,993 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-22(90) Roadway 4.52 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther7,896 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-43(45) Roadway 4 Miles $36000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther7,152 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP9200(76)Roadway Miles $4500 $5000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP190(10)Roadway 10.33 Miles $31500 $31500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 335 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP84(15)Roadway 11.62 Miles $61296 $68106 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,285 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-26(73) Roadway 9.82 Miles $22054 $22054 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,620 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP/PHSIP9300(41)Roadway Miles HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP111(104)Roadway 0.47 Miles $38866 $38966 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther11,415 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP135(22)Roadway 5.62 Miles $7929.25 $7929.25 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,000 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STP/HSIP46(34)Roadway 6.54 Miles $71427 $71427 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,626 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-STP/HSIP6(117)Roadway 2.53 Miles HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther19,475 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-I-65-

2(97)

Roadway 0.0999999999999979 Miles $21073.21 $23414.68 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate161,050 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

NH/HSIP109(37)Roadway 3.99 Miles $3141.14 $3141.14 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

28,043 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP4450(7)Roadway 3.47 Miles $113083 $113583 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 4,750 35 City or 

Municipal 

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 51 of 75

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

Highway 

Agency

HSIP171(33)Roadway 0.66 Miles $39177 $43530 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 21,110 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

STPNH/HSIP10(75)Roadway 0.77 Miles $36995 $41106 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther12,210 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-26(70) Roadway 0.199999999999999 Miles $56029 $62255 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther11,220 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

R-PHSIP10(62)Roadway 0.18 Miles Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

Rural Principal ArterialOther6,630 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure

HSIP-10(68) Roadway 2.89 Miles $208124 $209824 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther8,360 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Infrastructure
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 52 of 75

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five 

years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Fatalities 1,032 937 1,014 996 967 962 1,037 1,024 1,041

Serious Injuries 6,655 7,371 7,596 6,925 6,868 7,613 7,595 7,126 5,742

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

1.470 1.330 1.430 1.400 1.330 1.280 1.351 1.250 1.260

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

9.450 10.420 10.680 9.740 9.470 10.110 9.880 8.660 6.960

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

94 88 76 94 95 120 114 137 149

Number of nonmotorized serious 

injuries

285 327 303 256 346 385 382 415 352
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 53 of 75

880

900

920

940

960

980

1000

1020

1040

1060

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Annual Fatalities

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Annual Serious Injuries

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 54 of 75

1.1

1.15

1.2

1.25

1.3

1.35

1.4

1.45

1.5

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 55 of 75

Describe fatality data source. 

State Motor Vehicle Crash Database

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and 

ownership. 

Year 2018

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

 (5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

 (5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Interstate

55.4 305.6 1.1 6.07

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

0 0 0 0

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other

90 388.6 1.04 4.5

Rural Minor Arterial 96.4 595.2 0.72 4.46

Rural Minor Collector 72.8 446.2 0.31 1.92

Rural Major Collector 77.8 495.4 0.53 3.37

Rural Local Road or 

Street

72.8 551.6 0.05 0.43

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Fatalities Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 56 of 75

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

 (5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

 (5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

92.4 497.2 1.18 6.33

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

12.8 74.4 3.12 18.5

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other

191 1,547 0.82 6.67

Urban Minor Arterial 124 913.2 0.53 3.93

Urban Minor Collector 17.4 105.2 2.8 16.22

Urban Major Collector 53.6 463.8 0.59 5.22

Urban Local Road or 

Street

55 602.8 0.02 0.3
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 57 of 75

Year 2018

Roadways Number of Fatalities

 (5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

 (5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

State Highway 

Agency

662 4,445.8

County Highway 

Agency

191 1,377.4

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City or Municipal 

Highway Agency

153.2 1,442.8

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority

Local Toll Authority

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, 

University)

Indian Tribe Nation

Provide additional discussion related to general highway safety trends. 

•

Tennessee Highway Safety Office (THSO) funding is stable; and there are no anticipated changes or 

additional funds available for behavioral/enforcement programs over next two years 

• Distracted driving and speeding are behavioral factors of concern 

• Predictive Crash Software has been expanded to include availability to local law enforcement, such as 

Sheriffs’ Departments and city police 

• Non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries are seeing an increase nationally as well as in Tennessee 

• Tennessee’s population continues to grow; there is an influx of people coming to state as new residents 

plus Tennessee is home to several popular destinations for tourists 

• VMT trend continues upward 
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 58 of 75

• The number of highway construction work zones across state is anticipated to increase as IMPROVE 

Act projects are implemented 

• Long-term federal funding for transportation is uncertain 

• VMT data is not available by government control therefore there are no crash rates for this data in 

question 32 

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets 

Calendar Year 2020 Targets *

Number of Fatalities:1043.4

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The number of traffic fatalities in Tennessee has been over 1,000 since 2016 with current YTD

fatalities as of May 1, 2019 showing an increase of 22 fatalities over the same date in 2018. This may 

be due to factors such as the continued rise in Tennessee’s population. It is estimated that population 

grew by 0.91% in the Volunteer State from 2017 to 2018. While this is a slight decrease from the 

population growth Tennessee experienced from 2016-2017 (0.96%), Tennessee’s growing economy, 

popularity as a tourist destination, and low fuel prices make it likely that vehicle miles traveled (VMT) 

will continue to increase. As VMT increases, the opportunity for vehicle crashes to occur also rises. 

The number of work zones is expected to remain high due to a state funding increase (IMPROVE 

Act) which occurred in 2017 and which also requires TDOT to complete 962 projects over an 

unspecified period of time. Some of these projects include safety improvements, however, there is a 

lag between the time safety projects are implemented to completion and additional time needed for 

those projects to then have an impact on results. One year of low fatalities (962 in 2015) will drop 

from the target period but will remain in the baseline period, keeping the baseline lower than the 

projected moving average. As previously stated, the number of fatalities has been over 1,000 during 

each of the 3 years of available data included in this target setting cycle (2016-2018). Work to 

increase traffic safety in Tennessee is ongoing. In addition to implementing the Highway Safety 

Manual, utilizing predictive analysis to provide further enforcement at high crash locations, and 

providing various training programs, a bill banning handheld cell phones or standalone electronic 

devices took effect on July 1, 2019. This bill also requires the Tennessee Department of Safety and 

Homeland Security (TDOSHS) to include distracted driving as part of the information presented in 

driver education training. Targets were set by consensus among working group participants which 

consisted of members of the Tennessee Highway Safety Office, TDOSHS, Tennessee Division Office 

of FHWA, and various divisions within TDOT. Input from the Knoxville Regional Transportation 

Planning Organization, the Greater Nashville Regional Council, Chattanooga – Hamilton Regional 

Planning Agency, and the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization was included in the target 

decision making process. The other 7 MPO's were invited to the process of determining the targets. 

Leadership approved a target of 1043.4 for the 2016-2020 target setting performance cycle. This 

target assumes that the number of fatalities for 2019 and 2020 will increase by 1% each year. This 

coincides with the population increase Tennessee has experienced in 2018 as well as the identified 

increase in VMT expected over the next two years. Additional factors provided by the Tennessee 

Department of Safety and Homeland Security and which may contribute to fatality numbers in 

Tennessee include geography, tourism, and freight. Tennessee is bordered by 8 other states and has 

42 of 95 counties bordering another state. This may draw non-residents from out of state which could 

contribute to volume and safety due to varying laws and traffic operations between states. Tourism is 
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 59 of 75

Tennessee’s 2nd largest industry. Special events such as the NFL draft, Bonnaroo Music Festival, 

Bristol races, and Memphis in May Barbecue Festival contribute to the number of tourists visiting the 

state. According to Tennessee Department of Tourism Development, there were a recorded 113.6 

Million person stays in 2017. It is always the intent of the Tennessee Department of Transportation 

and our partner agencies to reduce traffic fatalities on our roadways. These targets are performance 

projections based on historical data and influencing factors.

Number of Serious Injuries:6352.4

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

A large decrease in serious injuries occurred in Tennessee from CY 2017 to CY 2018. In compliance 

with the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Safety Performance Management Measures Final 

Rule (23 CFR 490), Tennessee revised the crash report December 2017 to reflect the Model 

Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria Fourth Edition (MMUCC 4th edition) "Suspected Serious Injury (A)" 

attribute found in the "Injury Status" element. All states were required to comply with the new 

definition by April 15, 2019. Though Tennessee has been experiencing a decrease in serious injuries 

over the past couple of years, the drastic decrease in serious injuries in 2018 is likely an effect of 

updating the crash report to meet FHWA’s requirement. Tennessee continues to experience an 

increase to population. It is estimated that population grew by 0.91% in the Volunteer State from 2017 

to 2018. While this is a slight decrease from the population growth Tennessee experienced from 

2016-2017 (0.96%), Tennessee’s growing economy, popularity as a tourist destination, and low fuel 

prices make it likely that vehicle miles traveled (VMT) will continue to increase. As VMT increases, 

the opportunity for vehicle crashes to occur also rises. The number of work zones is expected to 

remain high due to a state funding increase (IMPROVE Act) which occurred in 2017 and which also 

requires TDOT to complete 962 projects over an unspecified period of time. Some of these projects 

include safety improvements, however, there is a lag between the time safety projects are 

implemented to completion and additional time needed for those projects to then have an impact on 

results. Work to increase traffic safety in Tennessee is ongoing. In addition to implementing the 

Highway Safety Manual, utilizing predictive analysis to provide further enforcement at high crash 

locations, and providing various training programs, a bill banning handheld cell phones or standalone 

electronic devices took effect on July 1, 2019. This bill also requires the Department of Safety and 

Homeland Security (TDOSHS) to include distracted driving as part of the information presented in 

driver education training. Additionally, Tennessee’s Calendar Year 2018 seatbelt usage rate (90.9%) 

was higher than the national average (89.6%). This marks the first year Tennessee’s usage rate 

surpassed 90 percent. Targets were set by consensus among working group participants which 

consisted of members of the Tennessee Highway Safety Office (THSO), TDOSHS, Tennessee 

Division Office of FHWA, and various divisions within TDOT. Input from the Knoxville Regional 

Transportation Planning Organization, the Greater Nashville Regional Council, Chattanooga – 

Hamilton Regional Planning Agency, and the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization was 

included in the target decision making process. The other 7 MPO's were invited to the process of 

determining the targets. The working group has selected a target of 6,352.4 for the 2016-2020 target 

setting performance cycle. This target assumes that the number of serious injuries for 2019 and 2020 

will decrease by 1.1% each year. This percentage represents the average rate of change in serious 

injury numbers from 2013-2017. Calendar year 2018 was not included in the average rate of change 

since it was unclear if this large decrease was due primarily to the terminology change or other 

factors. It is always the intent of the Tennessee Department of Transportation and our partner 

agencies to reduce serious injuries on our roadways. As such, these targets are performance 

projections based on historical data and influencing factors.
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 60 of 75

Fatality Rate:1.256

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

It is estimated that population grew by 0.91% in the Volunteer State from 2017 to 2018. While this is a 

slight decrease from the population growth Tennessee experienced from 2016-2017 (0.96%), 

Tennessee’s growing economy, popularity as a tourist destination, and low fuel prices make it likely 

that vehicle miles traveled (VMT) will continue to increase. Targets were set by consensus among 

working group participants which consisted of members of the Tennessee Highway Safety Office 

(THSO), Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security (TDOSHS), Tennessee Division 

Office of FHWA, and various divisions within TDOT. Input from the Knoxville Regional Transportation 

Planning Organization, the Greater Nashville Regional Council, Chattanooga – Hamilton Regional 

Planning Agency, and the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization was included in the target 

decision making process. The other 7 MPO's were invited to the process of determining the targets. 

Published VMT from Federal Highway’s Office of Highway Policy Information (OHPI) were used for 

calendar years 2017 and prior. TDOT’s Long Range Planning Division estimates calendar year 2018 

VMT at 84,761 million miles. This estimate represents the VMT amount TDOT intends to submit to 

the Highway Performance and Monitoring System as of May 2, 2019. (Note: Additional information 

regarding VMT has caused an update to the amount used to identify baselines and targets. Because 

it is anticipated that these numbers will continue to change until TDOT is evaluated by FHWA, no 

updates have been made to the agreed upon 2014-2018 baseline or 2016-2020 target.) Based upon 

the increase in population and Tennessee’s healthy economy, the team determined a 1% increase in 

VMT during 2019 and again in 2020 would be the minimum likely increase. Once the VMT estimate 

for calendar year 2018 and percentage of VMT increase were agreed upon, the rate was then 

calculated using the 1,043.4 fatality number target to obtain the 1.256 target for the 2016-2020 target 

setting performance cycle. It is always the intent of the Tennessee Department of Transportation and 

our partner agencies to reduce traffic fatalities on our roadways. These targets are performance 

projections based on historical data and influencing factors.

Serious Injury Rate:7.690

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

It is estimated that population grew by 0.91% in the Volunteer State from 2017 to 2018. While this is a 

slight decrease from the population growth Tennessee experienced from 2016-2017 (0.96%), 

Tennessee’s growing economy, popularity as a tourist destination, and low fuel prices make it likely 

that vehicle miles traveled (VMT) will continue to increase. Targets were set by consensus among 

working group participants which consisted of members of the Tennessee Highway Safety Office 

(THSO), Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security (TDOSHS), Tennessee Division 

Office of FHWA, and various divisions within TDOT. Input from the Knoxville Regional Transportation 

Planning Organization, the Greater Nashville Regional Council, Chattanooga – Hamilton Regional 

Planning Agency, and the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization was included in the target 

decision making process. The other 7 MPO's were invited to the process of determining the targets. 

Published VMT from Federal Highway’s Office of Highway Policy Information (OHPI) were used for 

calendar years 2017 and prior. TDOT’s Long Range Planning Division estimates calendar year 2018 

VMT at 84,761 million miles. This estimate represents the VMT amount TDOT intends to submit to 

the Highway Performance and Monitoring System as of May 2, 2019. (Note: Additional information 

regarding VMT has caused an update to the amount used to identify baselines and targets. Because 

it is anticipated that these numbers will continue to change until TDOT is evaluated by FHWA, no 

updates have been made to the agreed upon 2014-2018 baseline or 2016-2020 target.) Based upon 
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 61 of 75

the increase in population and Tennessee’s healthy economy, the team determined a 1% increase in 

VMT during 2019 and again in 2020 would be the minimum likely increase. Once the VMT estimate 

for calendar year 2018 and percentage of VMT increase was agreed upon, the rate was then 

calculated using the 6352.4 serious injury number target to obtain the 7.690 target for the 2016-2020 

target setting performance cycle. It is always the intent of the Tennessee Department of 

Transportation and our partner agencies to reduce traffic fatalities on our roadways. These targets 

are performance projections based on historical data and influencing factors.

Total Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries:527.2

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The number of non-motorist serious injuries and fatalities is the fastest increasing trend of all safety 

performance measures with an average rate of change at 8.3% from year to year over the past 5 

years (2014-2018). In addition to the almost 1% population increase Tennessee experienced in 2018, 

there also appears to be increased use of personal mobility options such as e-scooters and bike 

share. Three more companies are scheduled to begin providing dockless bicycles in Tennessee’s 

capital, Nashville, this year. Meanwhile, the Tennessee General Assembly recently passed legislation 

which establishes requirements for the operation of electric scooters similar to those in place for 

bicycles. TDOT has awarded 16 Multimodal Access Grants, most of which will cover sidewalk and 

pedestrian improvements, for FY2019. While it is expected that projects resulting from the Multimodal 

Access Grants and Pedestrian Road Safety Initiative will be completed by the end of the target setting 

cycle, TDOT is still projecting that non-motorist serious injuries and fatalities will continue to rise. As 

of May 1, 2019, Year to Date (YTD) information shows an increase of 9 non-motorized fatalities 

against the same date in 2018. Work to increase traffic safety in Tennessee is ongoing. In addition to 

implementing the Highway Safety Manual, utilizing predictive analysis to provide further enforcement 

at high crash locations, and providing various training programs, a bill banning handheld cell phones 

or standalone electronic devices took effect on July 1, 2019. This bill also requires the Department of 

Safety and Homeland Security (TDOSHS) to include distracted driving as part of the information 

presented in driver education training. Targets were set by consensus among working group 

participants which consisted of members of the Tennessee Highway Safety Office (THSO), TDOSHS, 

Tennessee Division Office of FHWA, and various divisions within TDOT. Input from the Knoxville 

Regional Transportation Planning Organization, the Greater Nashville Regional Council, Chattanooga 

– Hamilton Regional Planning Agency, and the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization was 

included in the target decision making process. The other 7 MPO's were invited to the process of 

determining the targets. The working group has selected a target of 527.2 for the 2016-2020 target 

setting performance cycle. This target assumes that the number of non-motorized serious injuries and 

fatalities for 2019 will increase by approximately* 5.5% each year. This percentage represents the 

average rate of change in the 5-year moving average non-motorized serious injury and fatalities from

2014-2018. After this target was identified, it was noted that 10% of CY 2018 pedestrian fatalities 

occurred on Tennessee interstates. This may be an area to consider for further investigation. It is 

always the intent of the Tennessee Department of Transportation and our partner agencies to reduce 

traffic fatalities and serious injuries for all users of our roadways. As such, these targets are 

performance projections based on historical data and influencing factors. * The original 5.5% 

projection would indicate partial serious injuries and fatalities year over year. Adjustments have been 

made to account for this. This adjustment means the projected 2019 target is a 5.6% increase over 

calendar year 2018.
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 62 of 75

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish 

safety performance targets. 

•

A cross-functional, cross-agency working group was identified to develop targets for the safety 

performance measures. This working group included members of the Tennessee Highway Safety 

Office (THSO), Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security (TDS&HS), Tennessee 

Division of Federal Highway Administration, and Tennessee Department of Transportation. MPO’s and 

TPO were invited to participate and some of them participated. The target setting process consisted of 

data review, trend analysis, context/consideration of key factors, and consensus on target setting 

assumptions, and review and consensus on draft targets. The Safety PM Working Group provided 

recommendations to an Oversight Committee, which included directors from the TDOT, TDOS&HS, 

and THSO. 

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

Describe progress toward meeting the State’s 2018 Safety Performance Targets (based 

on data available at the time of reporting). For each target, include a discussion of any 

reasons for differences in the actual outcomes and targets. 

Based on preliminary data currently available, Tennessee's first Safety Performance Targets meet 4 out of the 

5 targets. 

The number of fatalities (5 yr avg) target was set at 1021.4. The preliminary data shows 1005.4. The state's 

target is 1.5% above the actual.

The number of serious injuries (5yr avg) target was set at 7319.4. The preliminary data shows 6988.4. The 

state's target is 4.5% above the actual.

. 

The rate of fatalities per 100 million VMT (5 yr avg) target was set at 1.337. The preliminary data shows 1.282. 

The state's target is 4.1% above the actual.

The rate of serious injuries per 100 million VMT (5 yr avg) target was set at 9.982. The preliminary data shows 

8.948. The state's target is 10% above the actual.

The number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries (5 yr avg) target was set at 493.2. The preliminary 

data shows 498. The state's target is less than 1% (.009) below the actual meaning this target was missed 

(barely).

All of the targets appear to be fairly good targets based on factors considered when making the targets 2 years 

ago. The rate of serious injuries target has not been missed but is 10% higher than the actual. It would be 

preferable to meet the target without being this much above. The rate targets are somewhat difficult to predict 

as they depend on VMT data which can vary due to the difficulty with traffic counting.

TDOT will continue to implement safety projects in areas that present the highest potential for a fatality or 

serious injury whether it be motorized or non-motorized. The primary guiding strategy used is the Strategic 

Highway Safety Plan. TDOT is also in the process of adopting and implementing the Highway Safety Manual.
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 63 of 75

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

No 

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries 65 

years of age and older for the past seven years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Fatalities

139 157 157 154 172 183 163

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Serious 

Injuries

566 534 528 664 635 652 523
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 64 of 75

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP? 

• Change in fatalities and serious injuries

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of 

the State's program level evaluations. 

The Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) Strategic Transportation Investments Division (STID) 

analyzed the effectiveness of constructed safety projects in reducing crash frequency. The analysis was 

conducted in two stages. The first stage examined 261 sites with crash data from three (3) years before and 

three (3) years after implementation of safety improvements as recommended in the site’s safety report. The 

sites include Road Safety Audits and Spot Safety Projects.

This Safety Projects Evaluation was initiated to accomplish several goals:

• Measure and evaluate the overall effectiveness of the TDOT safety program in reducing crash 

frequency 

• Assess the effectiveness of specific countermeasures in reducing crashes 

• Determine if the safety outcomes that were produced by recommended countermeasures could have 

been predicted using the HSM methodology 

• Identify recommendations that might improve performance of TDOT’s safety program. 

Conclusion

After conducting a two phase analysis of the effectiveness of constructed safety projects in reducing crash 

frequency. The Phase One Analysis suggests that the TDOT safety program overall has been successful in 

reducing crash frequency since sixty percent (60%) of sites had some level of crash reduction. The Phase Two 

Analysis involved a more detailed review of forty-five (45) sites using the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) 

procedures for estimating crash frequency with and without implementation of safety countermeasures. Fiftysix (56%) of the sites had a reduction in the observed after crash frequency compared to the expected before 

crash frequency; this is the measure of safety effectiveness. Thirty-eight (38%) of the sites had fewer observed 

after crashes than the expected after crashes with the recommended countermeasures.

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and 

success of the Highway Safety Improvement Program? 

• # RSAs completed

• Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process

• Increased focus on local road safety

• More systemic programs

• Organizational change

• Other-Improved data collection, transfer, access

• Other-There have been more systemic measures added to the RSA program
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 65 of 75

Describe significant program changes that have occurred since the last reporting 

period. 

Three systemic programs were eliminated. In lieu of having these programs, the countermeasure for these 

types of improvements have been incorporated into the RSA program.

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures.

Year 2018

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Lane Departure 606.8 3,325.2 0.78 4.31

Roadway Departure 508.6 2,550.2 0.66 3.31

Intersections 198.8 2,132 0.26 2.77

Pedestrians 112.4 312.4 0.14 0.4

Bicyclists 8 68.2 0.01 0.09

Older Drivers 193.6 851 0.25 1.1

Motorcyclists 138.6 690.4 0.18 0.89

Work Zones 16.8 111.4 0.02 0.14
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 66 of 75

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 67 of 75

Has the State completed any countermeasure effectiveness evaluations during the 

reporting period? 

No

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 68 of 75

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

115671.00 

Hamblen SR 

113 lm 4.67 Int 

Chucky River 

Rd. / Fish 

Hatchery 

12/5/14 

3/11/16

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Roadway - other 2.00 2.00 4.00

120079.00 

Obion SR 21 

lm 5.86 to 6.08 

at Black oak 

Elementary 

School 

8/28/15 

4/15/16

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control - other

1.00 1.00

119534.00 

Macon SR 56 

lm 5.15 to 

10.56 

from SR 262 to 

SR 52 6/17/15 

5/26/16

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control - other

10.00 8.00 1.00 4.00 3.00 14.00 12.00

117816.00 

Wilson SR 24 

lm 2.34 Int N 

Green Hill Rd. 

8/28/15 6/7/16 

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Other

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

8.00 6.00 1.00 8.00 9.00 14.00

117247.00 

Anderson SR 

61 lm 0.5 to 

2.40 Main St. 

to Poplar 

Creek 3/27/15 

to 5/31/16

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Other

Roadway Pavement 

surface - 

miscellaneous

69.00 61.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 17.00 22.00 88.00 85.00

120058.00 

Monroe SR 68 

lm 16.91 to 

20.01 

Intersections 

at Happy 

hollow Rd. and 

Elezar Rd. 

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Roadway 

widening - add 

lane(s) along 

segment

16.00 14.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 7.00 22.00 24.00
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 69 of 75

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

10/16/15 

4/30/16 

119066.00 

Maury SR 99 

18.14 to 18.34 

Int Patterson 

Dr. 12/4/15 

8/1/16

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Other

Roadway Roadway 

widening - add 

lane(s) along 

segment

9.00 3.00 1.00 12.00 1.00

119669.00 

Knox SR 168 

lm 6.96 Int SR 

71 access Rd. 

10/16/15 to 

6/20/16 

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control - other

16.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 18.00 11.00

119083.00 

Williamson SR 

6 o.20 to 0.38 

Intersection 

Miles Johnson 

Pkwy 5/15/15 

6/14/16

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Other

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control - other

13.00 39.00 2.00 5.00 7.00 20.00 46.00

116979.00 

Knox I 140 lm 

1.01 

Northbound 

exit ramp at 

SR 1 8/28/15 

3/30/16

Ramp Roadway 

delineation

Raised 

pavement 

markers

1.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 5.00

120165.00 

Henry 00904 

lm 0.0 to 5.33 

From Oak 

Grove Rd. to 

SR 76 4/1/16 

9/28 16 

Rural Minor 

Collector

Roadway Roadway - other 10.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 13.00 3.00

082905.01

Lawrence SR 

227 lm 0.0 to 

6.5 From 

Wayne County 

to Main St. 

2/12/16 8/3/16

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Pavement 

surface - 

miscellaneous

14.00 15.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 24.00 19.00

08246.00 

Pickett SR 

325 lm 0.0 to 

4.17 From 

Vann's Branch 

Rd. to SR 111 

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Roadway - other 11.00 4.00 1.00 5.00 4.00 17.00 8.00
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 70 of 75

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

7/10/ 15 

11/4/15
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 71 of 75

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative? 

 01/06/2015

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP? 

From: 2015 To: 2019

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update? 

 2020

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

ROAD TYPE MIRE NAME 

(MIRE NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY 

SEGMENT

Segment Identifier 

(12)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Route Number (8) 100 100

Route/Street Name 

(9)

100 100

Federal Aid/Route 

Type (21)

100 100

Rural/Urban 

Designation (20)

100 100 100 100

Surface Type (23) 100 100 100 100

Begin Point 

Segment 

Descriptor (10)

100 100 100 100 100 100

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Segment Length 

(13)

100 100

Direction of 

Inventory (18)

100 100

Functional Class 

(19)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Median Type (54) 100 100

Access Control 

(22)

100 100
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 72 of 75

ROAD TYPE MIRE NAME 

(MIRE NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

One/Two Way 

Operations (91)

100 100

Number of Through 

Lanes (31)

100 100 100 100

Average Annual 

Daily Traffic (79)

100 100 100

AADT Year (80) 100

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100 100 100 100 100

INTERSECTION Unique Junction 

Identifier (120)

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Road 1 

Crossing Point 

(122)

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Road 2 

Crossing Point 

(123)

100 100

Intersection/Juncti

on Geometry (126)

Intersection/Juncti

on Traffic Control 

(131)

100 100

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road 

(79)

100 100

AADT Year (80) 100 100

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139)

INTERCHANGE/R

AMP

Unique 

Interchange 

Identifier (178)

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (197)

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

100 100
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 73 of 75

ROAD TYPE MIRE NAME 

(MIRE NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201)

Ramp Length (187) 100 100

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195)

100 100

Roadway Type at 

End Ramp 

Terminal (199)

100 100

Interchange Type 

(182)

Ramp AADT (191) 100 100

Year of Ramp 

AADT (192)

100 100

Functional Class 

(19)

100 100

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100

Totals (Average Percent Complete): 100.00 94.44 75.00 75.00 90.91 90.91 100.00 88.89 100.00 100.00

*Based on Functional Classification

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026. 

The Long Range Planning Division collects all but three of the FDE’s. One data element that has partial collection is (#126 Intersection/Junction Geometry). The other two are #139 Unique Approach Identifier and #182 Interchange Type. 

Long Range Planning anticipates the ability to collect these remaining elements in the short term (1-3 years). There is a software development project underway at TDOT to implement ESRI Roads and Highways. This project includes the 

necessary software development required to store this data along with the other roadway data elements. Data collection for these data elements is in the planning stages.

Did the State conduct an HSIP program assessment during the reporting period? 

No

When does the State plan to complete its next HSIP program assessment.

2019
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 74 of 75

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

STID Program Description 100617.pdf

Project Implementation:

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

Compliance Assessment:
2019 Tennessee Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 75 of 75

Glossary

5 year rolling average: means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data 

(e.g. annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area: means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process.

Highway safety improvement project: means strategies, activities and projects on a public road 

that are consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous 

road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem.

HMVMT: means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects: are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule: applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which 

data are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013.

Performance measure: means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to 

monitor changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and 

objectives.

Programmed funds: mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification: means the process by which streets and highways are 

grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP): means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on 

safety data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148.

Systematic: refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across 

a system.

Systemic safety improvement: means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high 

risk roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types.

Transfer: means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.