alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM N-PX ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF Government & Agency Securities Portfolio, Money Market Portfolio and Tax-Exempt Portfolio Each a Series of Cash Equivalent Fund Investment Company Act file number  811-2899 Cash Equivalent Fund (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)  345 Park Avenue New York, NY  10154 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code) John Millette Secretary One Beacon Street Boston, MA  02108-3106 (Name and address of agent for service) Registrant's telephone number, including area code:617-295-1000 Date of fiscal year end:07/31 Date of reporting period:7/1/07-6/30/08 Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles. A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.  ******************************* FORM N-Px REPORT *******************************

ICA File Number: 811-02899
Reporting Period: 07/01/2007 - 06/30/2008
Cash Equivalent Fund









=========================== A   TAX-EXEMPT PORTFOLIO ===========================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND



================ B    GOVERNMENT & AGENCY SECURITIES PORTFOLIO =================


NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND


========================= C    MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO ==========================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND

========== END NPX REPORT  
  SIGNATURES [See General Instruction F] Pursuant to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. (Registrant)
        Cash Equivalent Fund
  By (Signature and Title)*/s/Michael G. Clark Michael G. Clark, Chief Executive Officer
 Date8/15/08 * Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ProxyMed, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Judson E. Schmid,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Judson E. Schmid

Judson E SchmidChief Financial OfficerApril 15, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to ProxyMed, Inc. and will be retained by
ProxyMed, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Daikin AC (Americas), Inc.

1645 Wallace Drive, Suite 110 

Carrollton, TX 75006 USA 

TEL: 866-4DAIKIN 

FAX: 972-245-1038 

www.daikinac.com 

November 1, 2012 

Melissa Fiffer 

Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch 

Stratospheric Protection Division 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1310 L Street, NW 

10th Floor (MC 6205J) 

Washington, DC 20005 

 RE: Additional Information in Support of Daikin U.S. Corporation’s SNAP 

 Petition for HFC-32 in Residential and Light Commercial Air 

 Conditioners and Heat Pumps 

 

VIA EMAIL ONLY 

Dear Ms. Fiffer: 

Daikin U.S. Corporation (Daikin) has learned that earlier this week the Air-Conditioning, 

Heating and Refrigeration Institute released a risk assessment on its web site that is relevant to 

Daikin’s pending HFC-32 SNAP petition. The new risk assessment is entitled “AHRI Project 

8004 Final Report, Risk Assessment of Heat Pumps using 2L Flammable Refrigerants,” and it 

assesses risks associated with the use of R-32 in residential heat pump applications. A copy of 

the report is attached as a PDF file, and the report can be accessed directly at the following URL: 

http://www.ahrinet.org/App_Content/ahri/files/RESEARCH/Technical%20Results/AHRI8004%20Final%20Report.pdf 

I informed David Godwin in your office of the existence of this new risk assessment on Tuesday, 

October 30. Daikin is notifying EPA of the existence of this report to as new information under 

40 C.F.R. § 82.180(a)(5). 

Sincerely, 

Mark V. Stanga 

for Daikin U.S. Corporation 

Encl.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

I, Jason A. Jenne, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of True Temper Sports, Inc. (the "Company"), state and certify
that this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 28, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 28, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/JASON A. JENNEJason A. Jenne Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)August 12, 2009


---



QuickLinks
#### John S. JACQUINTA and Doris L. Jacquinta, his wife, Appellants, v. Raymond W. TRADER and Charlene R. Trader, his wife, Appellees.

No. 70-147.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 10, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Louis Weissing, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
### -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 38 39 40 41 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/01 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ●

●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302*
             Date: August 20, 2007By:

/s/
Philippe Van AckerName:
    Philippe Van AckerTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer 
 *
    
    The introductory portion of paragraph 4 of the Section 302 certification that refers to the
certifying officers responsibility for establishing and maintaining internal control over
financial reporting for the company, as well as paragraph 4(b), have been omitted in
accordance with Release No. 33-8760 (December 15, 2006) because the compliance period has been
extended for small business issuers until the first fiscal year ending on or after December
15, 2007.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of iParty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 25, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  November 9, 2004

 
|   | /s/ SAL PERISANO        |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Sal Perisano            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DWIGHT A. STATEN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JAMES WALKER, Warden; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-16011

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00517-JAMGGH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Dwight A. Staten, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s order denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment dismissing his 42

FILED

JUN 17 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-16011

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants fabricated a rules violation report

against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an

abuse of discretion. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5

F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Staten’s motion to

reconsider because he did not advance any applicable ground for relief under either

Rule 59(e) or Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See id. at 1262-63

(setting forth requirements for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 60).

We do not consider issues that were not raised in Staten’s opening brief. See

Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit (f)(2)

**INDEMNIFICATION AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT**

This Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2007, is made by and between each of the DWS Scudder Funds listed in Schedule A attached hereto (the “Funds”) and Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (“DIMA”).

WHEREAS, the Funds have entered into Retirement Agreements of even date herewith with their Independent Directors listed in Schedule B attached hereto, for the purpose of facilitating the creation of a unified board structure where the board members of the Funds and of the other DWS Scudder Funds would be primarily the same individuals (the “Consolidated Board”); and

WHEREAS, DIMA will benefit from the proposed consolidation of multiple boards through increased efficiencies and reduced costs in connection with operating and managing the DWS Scudder Funds and coordinating with their respective Boards, and, accordingly, the Boards have requested and DIMA has agreed to reimburse the Funds for all costs of the retirement benefit granted by the Funds to the Independent Directors under the terms of the aforesaid Retirement Agreements and to provide certain further assurances and indemnities for the benefit of the Independent Directors.

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

1.     Reimbursement of Costs.  DIMA shall reimburse the Funds promptly upon payment for the cost of the retirement benefits provided to the Independent Directors under the terms of the aforesaid Retirement Agreements.

2.         Existing Indemnification Agreements.  DIMA agrees that the retirement of the Independent Directors under the terms of the aforesaid Retirement Agreements shall in no way affect or diminish the contractual rights of indemnification that the Independent Directors may have at the time under any agreement of indemnification between an Independent Director and DIMA, including without limitation agreements of indemnification currently in effect with respect to matters related to market timing and matters related to merged or liquidated funds.  Upon request made by any Independent Director, DIMA agrees to execute a separate instrument confirming the existence and continuation of any such agreement of indemnification.

3.         Maintenance of Minimum Insurance Coverage.  In the event that the Consolidated Board determines to reduce insurance coverage below the minimum levels stated in the aforesaid Retirement Agreements at any time during the six-year period following the effective date of the board consolidation, then DIMA at its expense will purchase excess insurance coverage for the benefit of the Independent Directors sufficient to maintain such minimum coverage levels in place for the duration of the period specified in the aforesaid Retirement Agreements, provided that in the event that such excess coverage is not available in the marketplace on commercially reasonable terms from a conventional third-party insurer, DIMA (or an affiliate of DIMA) may, at DIMA’s discretion and in lieu of purchasingsuch excess insurance coverage, elect instead to 

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                        FORM OF SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

        In connection with the quarterly report of Seminis, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alfonso Romo
Garza, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sections 1350(a) and (b), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


Date: May 10, 2004

                                                      /s/ Alfonso Romo Garza
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Alfonso Romo Garza
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27927]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 54821]]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA


Proposed Posting of Stockyard

    The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, United 
States Department of Agriculture, has information that the livestock 
market named below is a stockyard as defined in Section 302 of the 
Packers and Stockyards Act (7 U.S.C. 202), and should be made subject 
to the provisions of the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended 
(7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.).

IL-175  Greenville Livestock, Inc., Centralia, Illinois

    Pursuant to the authority under Section 302 of the Packers and 
Stockyards Act, notice is hereby given that it is proposed to designate 
the stockyard named above as a posted stockyard subject to the 
provisions of said Act.
    Any person who wishes to submit written data, views or arguments 
concerning the proposed designation may do so by filing them with the 
Director, Livestock Marketing Division, Grain Inspection, Packers and 
Stockyards Administration, Room 3408-South Building, U. S. Department 
of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250, by November 6, 1997.
    All written submissions made pursuant to this notice will be made 
available for public inspection in the office of the Director of the 
Livestock Marketing Division during normal business hours.

    Done at Washington, D.C. this 14th day of October 1997.
Daniel L. Van Ackeren,
Director, Livestock Marketing Division, Packers and Stockyards 
Programs.
[FR Doc. 97-27927 Filed 10-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-EN-P
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

************CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-76526, 33-80454, 33-88302, 333-2818, 333-07457, 333-62517, 333-62983, 333-64139, 333-68161, 333-49004, 333-61412, 333-76826) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-39453, 333-124359, 333-131676) of Rural/Metro Corporation of ourreport dated September 21, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Phoenix, Arizona 

September 21, 2006
#### Richard FROST, Petitioner, v. Patrick J. FINNEY, d/b/a American Yacht Company, Respondent.

No. 39359.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 8, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed. 228 So.2d 617.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
- 492 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S 302 N ebraska R eport STATE v . SAVAGE Cite as 302 Neb. 492



### S tate of 

### N ebraska 

### , appellee 

### , v



### . C ourt n ey 

### J. S avage 

### , appella ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed March 15, 2019. No. S-17-1166.

suppleme n tal opi n 

### Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: S us 

### I

. S tro n g 

### , Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modi

fied. Motion for rehearing overrul Darik J. Von Loh, of Hernandez Frantz, Von Loh, appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Austin N. Relph for appellee.
H eavi c a n 

### , C.J., M iller


### - L erma n 

### , C assel 

### , S ta c 

### P

apik 

### , and F reude n berg 

### ,

P er 

### C uriam 

### This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Courtney J. Savage, concerning our opinion in State v. Savage , 301 Neb. 873, 920 N.W.2d 692 (2018). We overrule the motion, but we modify the opinion as follows: In the subsection “(a) Authentication,” after the fourth sentence of the fourth paragraph, we insert the following language: As for Savage’s contention that the State did not properly authenticate messages sent to him by others, we again disagree. The State was required only to introduce testi

mony sufficient to establish that the evidence was what Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/24/2019 09:08 AM CDT- 493 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S 302 N ebraska R eport STATE v . SAVAGE Cite as 302 Neb. 492


### the State claimed it to be. The State did not claim that messages sent by others were anything more than mes

sages sent to Savage’s cell phone. See State v. Elseman , 287 Neb. 134, 841 N.W.2d 225 (2014). Savage , 301 Neb. at 885, 920 N.W.2d at 703. In subsection “(b) Hearsay,” following the second to the last paragraph, we insert the following paragraph: We also reject Savage’s argument that text messages sent to his cell phone by unidentified individuals contained inadmissible hearsay. Hearsay is “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the mat

ter asserted.” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-801(3) (Reissue 2016). Messages sent to Savage’s cell phone were not offered for the truth of the matters asserted. They were offered to prove that the statements were made. Savage , 301 Neb. at 887, 920 N.W.2d at 704. The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. F ormer opi n io n modif 

### M otio n for reheari n g overru
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 53769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27572]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NORTHEAST DAIRY COMPACT COMMISSION

7 CFR Chapter XIII


Compact Over-Order Price Regulation

AGENCY: Northeast Dairy Compact Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Compact Commission will hold its monthly meeting to 
consider whether to adopt a Final Rule extending the current over-order 
price regulation beyond its present December 31, 1997 deadline, and 
whether to amend the regulation, generally. The Commission will also 
review procedures relating to ongoing studies and consider matters of 
administration.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for October 23, 1997, 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 
p.m.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at the Grist Mill Restaurant, 520 
South Street in Bow, NH.

FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Smith, Executive Director, 
Northeast Dairy Compact Commission, 43 State Street, PO Box 1058, 
Montpelier, VT 05601. Telephone (802) 229-1941.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Compact 
Commission will hold its regular monthly meeting. The Commission will 
consider whether to adopt a Final Rule extending the current over-order 
price regulation beyond its present December 31, 1997 deadline, and 
whether to amend the regulation, generally. See Proposed Rule, 62 FR 
47156 (September 8, 1997). The Commission will also review procedures 
for conducting a study of regional dairy farm cost of production and a 
study for assessing the regional impact of over-order price regulation. 
The Commission will also consider certain matters relating to 
administration.
Daniel Smith,
Executive Director.
(Authority: (a) Article V, Section 11 of the Northeast Interstate 
Dairy Compact, and all other applicable Articles and Sections, as 
approved by Section 147, of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and 
Reform Act (FAIR ACT), Pub. L. 104-127, and as thereby set forth in 
S.J. Res. 28(1)(b) of the 104th Congress (codified at 7 U.S.C. 
7256); Finding of Compelling Public Interest by United States 
Department of Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman, August 8, 1996 and 
March 20, 1997. (b) Bylaws of the Northeast Dairy Compact 
Commission, adopted November 21, 1996.)
[FR Doc. 97-27572 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1650-01-P