alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Raymond MILLS and the Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited, Appellants, v. AVON PARK MOTOR COMPANY and American Fire & Casualty Company, Appellees.

No. 68-563.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 17, 1969.

B. C. Pyle of Whittaker, Pyle & Wood, Orlando, for appellants.

Gordon H. Harris of Holland & Knight, Bartow, for appellee American Fire *&*Casualty Co.

David F. Lanier, Avon Park, for appellee Avon Park Motor Co.

*411PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. This case involves the same principles of law as North Florida Motor Company v. Pembleton, 225 So.2d 349, decided by the First District Court of Appeal July 22, 1969. Here the trier of fact arrived, on conflicting evidence, at the opposite result. In each case the evidence supported the finding. See Commercial Union Insurance Company of New York v. Padrick Chevrolet Company, Inc., Fla. App.1967, 196 So.2d 235.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and MANN and Me-NULTY, JJ., concur.
SAMPLE: FLYER ON SUBREC

TITLE VI REQUIRE

This sample template is designed to be used a an example for State Transporta

Agencies of how they can inform subrecipient entities of their obligations under Titl

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The highlighted sections are intended to be filled in 

the State Transportation Agency. This is a sample only and is not intended to b

requirement of the Federal Highway Administrat
Title VI Complaint Procedures 

Subrecipients of federal assistance shall forward all Title VI Complaints to the Federal Highway Administration Division Office for transmittal to FHWA Office of Civil Rights (HCR). This process includes complaints received about subrecipients. Members of the public may file Title VI Complaints directly with FHWA via the website below, or by requesting a Title VI Complaint form from FHWA via email at: FHWA.TitleVIcomplaints@dot.gov. 

State DOT Name 

Street Address 

___ 

Address 2 

___ 

City, ST ZIP Code 

___ 

Phone: 

___ 

Fax: 

___ 

E-mail address 

StatNamTitle VI for Sub
Who is a Subrecipient? 

A subrecipient is a non-Federal entity that receives a subaward from a passthrough entity to carry out part of a Federal program, and Title VI also applies to these entities. A subrecipient may include, but is not limited to: a city, county, metropolitan planning organization, college/university, contractor or sub-grantee. What is Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and activities of any entity that receives federal financial assistance. The law provides that: “[n]o person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000d. 

Entities, whether public or 

private, that receive federal financial assistance (called recipients) from any federal agency, including the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), must take concrete steps to ensure nondiscrimination in their programs and activities. 

What kinds of discrimination 

are prohibited by Title VI? 

U.S. Department of Transportation Title VI regulations (found in Title 49, Part 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations; 49 C.F.R. Part 21) describe the general and specific kinds of discrimination prohibited by Title VI. Generally, recipients may not, directly or through contractual arrangements: 

1. Engage in intentional 

discrimination because of race, color, or national origin; 

2. Use criteria or methods 

of administration which have the effect of subjecting persons to discrimination because of their race, color, or national origin; or 

3. Intimidate, threaten, 

coerce, or discriminate against any individual in retaliation for exercising a right or privilege. 

FHWA reqto: 

• Perfo

undeconfoVI co

• Subm

reque

• Colle

inform

• Route 

direc

 (Insert Sfor Subre(Insert your Syour Subrecip
#### Julio PRATO, Appellant, v. Morris HASSELL, Louis Stein, et al., Appellees.

No. 68-1094.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 6, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                        Form of Section 906 Certification

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                     PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER REGARDING
                        CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P.


I, Warren H. Otto, hereby certify that:

     (1)  the Form 10-Q of Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P. for quarter ended
          September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P.



November 14, 2002                             /s/ Warren H. Otto
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Warren H. Otto
                                              Chief Executive Officer
#### Ex parte Willard L. CARY, alias.

SC 2764.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 30, 1977.

FAULKNER, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Board of Directors ofMTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.:

      We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in (1) the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-117549), (2) the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-123144), (3) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-72269), and (4) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-123147), of MTM Technologies, Inc., of our report dated February 20, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Vector Global Services, Inc., and subsidiaries as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MTM Technologies, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2005.

Ernst & Young LLPJune 27, 2005
#### STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Petitioner, v. William J. TANNEY and Barry V. Forde, as Tanney & Forde, a law partnership, Respondents.

No. 70-213.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 23, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001078723
<NAME> BLENCATHIA ACQUISITION CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   772
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5000000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       772
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0


</TABLE>
#### George GREEN, Appellant, v. Barbara DONES, Appellee.

No. 70-128.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 27, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 9, 1970.

Gale & Goldman, Miami, for appellant.

*161Ward, Gustafson & Caldwell, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Hoffman v. Linley, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 638.
# L_2005305EN.01003601.xml

| 24.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 305/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 305/36

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 November 2005

on the European Capital of Culture event for the year 2009

(2005/815/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Decision No 1419/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2005 to 2019 (1), and in particular Article 2(3) thereof,

Having regard to the Selection Panel report of April 2005 submitted to the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 2(2) of Decision No 1419/1999/EC,

Whereas the criteria laid down in Article 3 of and Annex II to Decision No 1419/1999/EC are entirely fulfilled,

Having regard to the recommendation from the Commission of 18 October 2005,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Linz and Vilnius shall be designated as ‘European Capital of Culture 2009’ in accordance with Article 2(1) of Decision No 1419/1999/EC.

Article 2

The two cities designated shall take the necessary measures in order to ensure the effective implementation of Articles 1 and 5 of Decision No 1419/1999/EC.

Done at Brussels, 14 November 2005.

For the Council

The President

T. JOWELL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 166, 1.7.1999, p. 1. Decision as amended by Decision No 649/2005/EC (OJ L 117, 4.5.2005, p. 20).

1

---
259 La. 70

#### Angie R. LEWIS et al. v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 51519.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 24, 1971.

In re: Angie R. Lewis, individually and as natural tutrix of the minors, Kenneth Ray Lewis, Jr. and Velencia Ann Lewis applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Sabine. 247 So.2d 635.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Meeting of the Division 
of Research Grants Advisory Committee

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Division of Research Grants Advisory Committee, November 17-18, 
1997, Building 31C, Conference Room 10, National Institutes of Health, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    The entire meeting will be open to the public from 8:30 on November 
17 to adjournment on November 18. The meeting will include, among other 
topics, a discussion of some recent experiences and experiments in 
streamlining the peer review system. Attendance by the public will be 
limited to space available.
    The Office of Committee Management, Center for Scientific Review, 
Rockledge 2 Building, Suite 3016, National Institutes of Health, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7778, telephone (301) 435-1124, will furnish a 
summary of the meeting and a roster of the committee members.
    Dr. Samuel Joseloff, Executive Secretary of the Committee, 
Rockledge 2 Building, Suite 3176, National Institutes of Health, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7762, phone (301) 435-0691, will provide 
substantive program information upon request.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact the Executive Secretary at least two weeks in advance of the 
meeting.

    Dated: October 10, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-27448 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

I, James P. Tolley, the principal accounting officer of Agemark Corporation (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

      (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which this
      certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Registrant.

Dated:  May 17, 2004
/s/ JAMES P. TOLLEY
-------------------
James P. Tolley
Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
#### John Willie WALDON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-822.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 19, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.