alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26506]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Research Resources; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Center for Research Resources Initial Review Group--General Clinical 
Research Centers Review Committee, October 15-16, 1997, Bethesda Ramada 
Hotel, Ambassador 2 Room, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland, 
which was published in the Federal Register on September 23 (62 FR 
49697).
    This committee was scheduled to meet on October 15-16, 1997, from 
8:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. in open session, and from 9:30 a.m. until 
adjournment in closed session. The meeting has been changed to add an 
additional open session on October 16, 1997.
    The session on October 16 will be open to the public from 10:30 
a.m. to 11:30 a.m., and will be closed from 11:30 a.m. until 
adjournment for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual 
grant applications.

    Dated: October 1, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-26506 Filed 10-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
#### Robert E. DeROSSETTE v. Theda M. DeROSSETTE.

No. 49864.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 8, 1978.

Robert W. Gee, Bullard, Campbell & Gee, Vicksburg, for appellant.

J. Mack Varner, Vicksburg, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Warren County; Ernest Kellner, Chancellor.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., BROOM and LEE, JJ., and 0. GUYTON IDOM, C.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART.

*807INZER and SMITH, P. JJ., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 31st District Court of Lipscomb County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on May 19,

2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Unit Petroleum Company v.

David Pond Well Service, Inc., d/b/a D.W.P. Production

Case Number: 07-12-00359-CV Trial Court Number: 11-04-4287

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court issued May 19, 2014, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court is reversed and that judgment is hereby

rendered declaring that, as between Unit Petroleum Company (Unit) and David Pond

Well Service, Inc. d/b/a D.W.P. Production (Pond), (1) Unit owns the exclusive right to

establish a proration unit encompassing any part of the South one-half (S/2) of Section

539, Block 43, H.&T.C. RR. Co. Survey, Lipscomb County, Texas, save and except the

5 1⁄2 inch diameter wellbore, known as the Tarbox #1 well, from a depth of 7,930 feet

subsurface to 7,990 feet subsurface, (2) Pond owns the exclusive right to establish a

proration unit encompassing any part of the 5 1⁄2 inch diameter wellbore, known as the

Tarbox #1 well, from a depth of 7,930 feet subsurface to 7,990 feet subsurface, (3) Unit

owes Pond the duty to designate a sufficient amount and configuration of acreage from

the South one-half (S/2) of Section 539, Block 43, H.&T.C. RR. Co. Survey, Lipscomb

County, Texas to permit Pond to produce, in accordance with the rules and regulations

of the Texas Railroad Commission, oil, gas and other minerals from the Tarbox #1 well,

and (4) Pond did not acquire title to any oil, gas or other minerals in place outside of the

Tarbox #1 well, or the appurtenant right to establish, designate or claim a proration unit

encompassing any property other than the wellbore itself.

It is further ordered that this cause is remanded to the trial court to consider

issues relating to injunctive relief as well as damages and attorney’s fees which were

severed from the original lawsuit.It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that all costs expended in this appeal

be paid by Appellee, David Pond Well Service, Inc. d/b/a D.W.P. Production.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on September 24, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roy N. TORIBIO.

No. 62129.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: Roy N. Toribio, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Jefferson Parish.

Writ denied. Adequate remedy in event of conviction by review.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of SRA International, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen C. Hughes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Dated: September 29, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/
STEPHEN C. HUGHES                            
|------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                          |  |  |  | Stephen C. Hughes                                
|                          |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Road Safety Audits Peer-to-Peer Program 

SUCCESS STORY 

The first Road Safety Audit (RSA) conducted through the FHWA Peer to Peer (P2P) 

Program was held in Albany, Georgia from November 30 – December 1, 2006. The RSA 

P2P Coordinator received an email message from Ms. Michele DeMott in August 2006 

requesting assistance for the city’s first Road Safety Audit. The study area was 

comprised of five major roadways, and five intersections and the decision to audit was 

based on four (4) factors. 

1. Existing intersection operations and safety concerns 

2. Redevelopment and expansion of a service station and truck stop 

3. New commercial development 

4. Road widening project proposed by Georgia DOT 

After obtaining detailed information about the audit area and the basis for conducting the 

audit, the P2P Coordinator canvassed the RSA P2P database to find a Peer whose area of 

expertise best matched the requirements for the Albany RSA. 

After identifying a Peer with pre-construction RSA experience, the Peer was contacted by 

the P2P Coordinator and asked to assist. The Peer was then put in direct contact with the 

agency requesting assistance. Through an exchange of information about the planned 

RSA, it was agreed that the Peer should travel to Albany to provide onsite assistance 

during the audit. 

The P2P Coordinator made travel arrangements for the Peer and all eligible travel 

expenses were paid for by the RSA P2P Program. The City of Albany was at no time 

required to pay for either the services or travel of the assisting Peer. 

The Peer participated in a pre-audit teleconference and email exchanges, as well as the 

audit itself. Multiple recommendations were developed from the RSA, some of which 

were implemented during the audit. Other recommendations were implemented within 

weeks of the audit creating safer intersections and roadways for the City of Albany. 

Some of the RSA’s recommended improvements included: 

• Refurbishing markings 

• Extending a raised median island to preclude left turns 

• Constructing formal left turn lanes 

• Removing a yield control 

• Improving pedestrian facilities 

Ms. DeMott credits the “All Star” Road Safety Audit Team for the successful completion 

of her agency’s first RSA. After the release of the Final Audit Report, Ms. DeMott 

reported that “having different perspectives - from safety engineers to FHWA to the state 

highway patrol - is key to auditing. I encourage agencies to utilize the Peer to Peer 

Program.” In a post audit interview, Ms. DeMott expressed her appreciation for having a 

Peer consultant from outside the area on her team. “Having a consultant free of charge - 

that would have normally cost $1,000s that’s not in the budget - is priceless.”
#### BOSTON INVESTMENT, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Howard LUBOW and Henrietta Lubow, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-325.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 28, 1969.

Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp & Ware, Miami, for appellant.

Ralph P. Ezzo, Miami, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.,

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Stuyvesant Corp. v. Stahl, Fla.1953, 62 So.2d 18.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remedent, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Robin List, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Philippe Van Acker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 
|                   |   |                    |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| /s/ Robin List         |   | /s/ Philippe Van Acker  |
| Robin List             |   | Philippe Van Acker      |
| Chief Executive Office |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| November 21, 2005      |   | November 21, 2005       |
255 La. 1095

#### George H. MERCER v. Theodore G. SOLOMON et al.

No. 50443.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 4, 1970.

In re: Theodore G. Solomon, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Eecond Circuit, Parish of Cad-do. 230 So.2d 755.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SRA
International, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen C. Hughes, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 27, 2008



/s/    STEPHEN C. HUGHESStephen C. Hughes Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Operations (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remedent USA, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Robin
List, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen F. Ross, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/S/ ROBIN LIST                                /S/ STEPHEN F. ROSS
-----------------------                       -----------------------
Robin List                                    Stephen F. Ross
Chief Executive Officer                       Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2004                               August 12, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1998
<CASH>                                           7,488
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,160
<INVENTORY>                                    130,747
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               256,089
<PP&E>                                         299,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 672,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,201
<BONDS>                                        537,830
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           534
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   672,069
<SALES>                                        676,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               676,637
<CGS>                                          404,728
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  746,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,220)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                27,805
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (108,797)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (110,236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (110,236)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.06)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28044]



[[Page 55233]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. IN97-2-001]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Refund Report

October 17, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 3, 1997, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee) tendered for filing a refund report pursuant to a 
Stipulation and Consent Agreement approved by the Commission's August 
7, 1997, order in Docket No. IN97-2-000.
    Tennessee states that on September 2, 1997, it made refunds of 
$85,899 to ten shippers or their successors to resolve an investigation 
into the discounts Tennessee gave to its marketing affiliates. On 
September 12, 1997, Tennessee notified Enforcement Staff that the 
refund check of $3,968 for GasMark Ltd. was returned to Tennessee. 
Tennessee stated that it attempted to effectuate the refund to GasMark 
Ltd. Liquidating Trust, Inc., a trust that was established to liquidate 
the companies assets, but the Trust is no longer in operation.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before October 24, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28044 Filed 10-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

 Washington, D.C. 20590

March 11, 2011

In Reply Refer To:

HSST/WZ-302

Mr. Henry A. Ross

Director of Government Relations

Plasticade Products

7700 N. Austin Avenue

Skokie, Illinois 60077

Dear Mr. Ross:

This is in response to your October 8, 2010, letter requesting the Federal Highway 

Administration’s (FHWA) acceptance of your company’s SentinelTM Type III Barricade as a 

crashworthy traffic control device for use in work zones and elsewhere on the National Highway 

System (NHS). Accompanying your letter was the FHWA Office of Safety Design form 

indicating successful performance when tested under the American Association of State 

Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware 

(MASH) Test 3-71 (modified.)

You requested that we find the SentinelTM Type III Barricade acceptable for use on the NHS 

under the provisions of the AASHTO MASH. Evaluation with the 1100C passenger car at low 

speed (Test 3-70), and the 2270P pickup-truck at high speed (3-72) are requirements under the 

MASH. Your request was accompanied by a January 17, 2010, letter from E-Tech Testing 

Services requesting a waiver of both MASH Tests 3-70 and 3-72 because of the nature of the test 

articles and geometry of the vehicles. We concur in the waiver of these tests.

This letter is the acknowledgement of the FHWA’s acceptance of your request. The original 

completed form has been modified by the addition of the FHWA acceptance letter number and 

the date of our review. The form, of which a copy is enclosed for reference, will be posted on 

our Web site in the near future.

Sincerely yours,

Michael S. Griffith

Director, Office of Safety Technologies

Office of Safety

Enclosures
```

[113th Congress Public Law 49]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 127 STAT. 577]]

Public Law 113-49
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Bay Pines, 
Florida, as the ``C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
            Center''. <<NOTE: Nov. 13, 2013 -  [H.R. 3302]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER, 
                              BAY PINES, FLORIDA.

     The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Bay Pines, 
Florida, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 
designated as the ``C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs 
Medical Center''. Any reference to such medical center in any law, 
regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the C.W. Bill Young Department 
of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

    Approved November 13, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3302:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013):
            Oct. 22, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 31, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
164772.2 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

____________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : 

:

Petitioner, :

:

v. : No. CA-05-141-E

:

CATHERINE Y. PEI, :

a/k/a CATHERINE BYNUM, :

: 

Respondent. :

___________________________________ :

ORDER ENFORCING INTERNAL REVENUE SUMMONS

AND NOW, this _____ day of _________________ 2005, the Court finding that:

(1) the summons issued by Shannon Dickerson, a Revenue Agent of the Internal

Revenue Service, to respondent Catherine Y. Pei (“Pei”), on February 20, 2004, was

issued for the legitimate purpose of determining the taxpayer’s correct federal income

tax liabilities with respect to the taxable years ending 1999 and 2000; (2) that the

summoned testimony and the documents identified on the summons and at the hearing

held on July 27, 2005 may be relevant to that determination; (3) the information sought

is not already in the possession of the Internal Revenue Service, except for those few

documents identified in Agent Dickerson’s declaration and at the hearing on July 27,

2005; and (4) the administrative procedural steps required by the Internal Revenue

Code have been followed; it is therefore

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, on August 31, 2005 at 10:00 a.m.,

respondent Pei shall appear before Revenue Agent Shannon Dickerson or any other

Case 1:05-cv-00141-SJM Document 7 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 1 of 2
 Case 1:05-cv-00141-SJM Document 8 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 2
-2-

164772.2 

authorized officer of the Internal Revenue Service, at the Internal Revenue Service office

located at 1314 Griswald Plaza, Erie, Pennsylvania, 16501, and then and there be sworn,

to give testimony and produce for examination and copying the items demanded in the

summons relating to any foreign credit card or bank account and which have not been

identified as already in the possession of the Internal Revenue Service. The

examination is ordered to continue from day-to-day until completed.

The respondent may, on a question-by-question or document-by-document

basis, invoke her fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination. To the extent

that the petitioner disputes these claims of privilege, the Court shall review the

substance of such privilege claims as necessary, at a later date and time to be

determined by the Court.

_________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00141-SJM Document 7 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 2 of 2
 Case 1:05-cv-00141-SJM Document 8 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 2