USA Banner
  U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Here's how you knowOfficial US Government Icon
              **Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
            Secure Site Icon
              **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
 U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation
 Search DOT
            Search
                    About FHWAFHWA Organization
                Headquarters Offices
                Field Offices
                Strategic Plan
                Business Opportunities
                Staff Directories
                Careers
                Highway History
                Contact UsProgramsAcquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                Safety
                Browse by TopicsResourcesCore Highway Topics
                Federal Aid Essentials
                Automation
                Complete Streets
                Laws and Regulations
                Policy & Guidance Center
                Section 508
                Publications and Statistics
                Professional Development
                National Highway Institute
                Resource Center
                Accessibility Resource Library
                FHWA Research LibraryNewsroomPress Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Photos
                Videos
                Media ContactsMenu FHWA Highway Safety Programs Home
                        Safety
                        Roadway Departure Safety
                        Reduce Crash Severity
                        Hardware Eligibility Letters


            
            In This Section
        Roadway Departure Safety
                Strategic Approach
                                Strategic Plan
                Crash Emphasis Brochures
                Focused Approach
                Noteworthy Practices
                Partner Resources
                Keep Vehicles on the Road
                                Pavement Friction
                Horizontal Curve Safety
                Rumble Strips and Rumble Stripes
                Nighttime Visibility
                Provide for a Safe Recovery
                                SafetyEdge
                Clear Zones
                Reduce Crash Severity
                                Overview
                Hardware Eligibility Letters
                Focus on Reducing Rural Roadway Departures (FoRRRwD)
                                Overview
                All Public Roads
                Proven Countermeasures
                Systemic Approach
                Safety Action Plans
                FoRRRwD Resources
                
                Safety Eligibility Letter B-153A
  
  **Hardware Type:**
            Longitudinal Barriers and Bridge Rails
                          **Code:**
            B-153A
                          **Date:**
            10/06/2011
                          **Testing Criteria:**
            NCHRP 350
                          **Manufacturer:**
            Atlanticum Bridge
                          **Device Description:**
            TL-2 NatureRail Aesthetic Barrier
                          **View PDF:**
            b153a.pdf (366.96 KB)
    
    Safety Eligibility Letter B-153A


						
**Download Version**PDF [366 KB]

			DOT logoU.S. Department of Transportation**Federal Highway Administration**

			1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E.Washington, D.C. 20590

			August 22, 2011

			In Reply Refer To: 
		 HSST/B-153A



Jason D.C. Hubbell, President
The Atlanticum Bridge Corporation
P.O. Box 1644 
Fort Walton Beach, Florida 32549
Dear Mr. Hubbell:
This letter is in response to your request for the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) acceptance of a modification to a roadside safety system for use on the National Highway System (NHS).
Name of system:

 	 Nature Rail Quick JointType of system:

 	 Aesthetic Guardrail SystemTest Level:

 	 NCHRP Report 350 TL-2Testing conducted by:

 	 TSR Engineering GmbH, Switzerland
 ISO 17025 accreditation valid until March 2013Date of request:

 	 December 22, 2010Request initially acknowledged:
  	  December 22, 2010You requested that we find this system acceptable for use on the NHS under the provisions of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 "Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features."
  **Decision:**
The following device was found acceptable, with details provided below:
  Quick Joint modification  to the Nature Rail Aesthetic Guardrail System.**Requirements**
 Roadside safety devices should meet the guidelines contained in the NCHRP Report 350 when tested prior to January 1, 2011, and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) if tested after that date.  The FHWA Memorandum "Identifying Acceptable Highway Safety Features" of July 25, 1997 provides further guidance on crash testing requirements of longitudinal barriers.
  **Description**
 The B-153 guardrail is comprised of steel components: c-channel posts; steel spacers and steel rails. Wood elements cover the steel post and rail components. The B-153 wood covering for steel posts are round. The wood coverings are connected to the steel post via a bolt that connects the steel post, the wood covering and the steel spacer together, as shown on the enclosed B-153 drawings.
  The B-153 steel rail component is masked with a wood covering which is slotted and saddles the steel rail, as shown in the drawings. Three modifications differentiate the B-153 from the B-153A are: a) the horizontal 90 degree rotation of the steel c-channel post, b) change of the post's wood covering from round to rectangular in profile, and c) increase in the cross-section of the rail steel component at connections.
  There are four structural differences between B-153 and B-153A.  The first is the rotation of the steel post.  The second, specifically with regard to the 4 meter post spacing configuration, is the addition of a 5mm thick steel rail component on the away-from-traffic side of the rail.  The third is the steel spacer.  The fourth is the configuration of the splice.  Collectively these structural changes have been shown, through testing to have reduced the guardrail system's maximum dynamic deflection.
  The B-153 steel spacer consists of a bent steel plate.  The B-153A spacer is a 3/4 hexagonal shape welded to a steel plate.  The B-153A “honeycomb” spacer is stiffer than the B-153 spacer. The B-153 rail splice is made by overlapping the steel rail sections which doubles up on the overall thickness of the steel at the splice as compared to the rest of the rail.  The B-153A rail splice is a 3mm thick plate that is folded in half and saddles on top of the steel rail components of two sections of rail.  This means the overall thickness of steel at the splice of the B-153 has increased by 1mm in the 2m post spacing configuration and 6mm in the 4m post spacing configuration.
  Improvement in dynamic deflection is seen when comparing the B-153 test results to the B-153A test results.  The B-153's 4m post spacing configuration had a maximum dynamic deflection with the heavy v ehicle test of 2.1m (approximately 6.9 feet).  The B-153A's 4m post spacing configuration under the same testing conditions had a maximum dynamic deflection of 1.4m, a one-third reduction in deflection.
**Crash Testing**

 FHWA Acceptance Letter B-153, dated January 17, 2007, found the Nature Rail system acceptable for use on the NHS at NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 2.  Four full-scale crash tests of the modified Nature Rail were performed according to EN1317 norms. These tests are summarized below and the Test Data Summary Sheets are enclosed for reference.
 
 EN-1317 Designation
 Test Lab Number
 Vehicle 
  model & weight
 Impact Speed
 Angle of Impact
 Post Spacing
 Dynamic
  DeflectionTB 32
 PHG3
 1991 Opel
  3251 pounds
 67.8 mph
 20.5 degrees
 2.0 m
 4.6 feetTB 11
 PHG4
 1993 Peugot
  1804 pounds
 61.2 mph
 20.5 degrees
 2.0 m
 3.0 feetTB 11
 PHG6
 1993 Peugot
  1795 pounds
 60.0 mph
 20.0 degrees
 4.0 m
 3.9 feetTB 32
 PHG7
 1994 Opel
  3304 pounds
 67.8 mph
 20.0 degrees
 4.0 m
 6.2 feet**Findings**

The occupant risk factors in each of the listed EN-1317 test were met.  While EN-1317 testing is ordinarily not accepted for use on the NHS, you are requesting FHWA acceptance of a modification to an existing system, and only to NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 2.  The Impact Severity of a TL-2 pickup truck test required under Report 350 (Test 2-11) is nominally 67.6 kJ. The Impact Severity of the EN-1317 TB 32 tests (PHG3 and PHG7) noted above was 88.78 kJ and 86.02 kJ respectively, which are significantly higher than the Report 350 TL-2 tests. We concur that these tests are adequate to establish equivalent performance of the modified barrier design.
 The system described in the requests above and detailed in the enclosed drawings is acceptable for use on the NHS under the range of conditions tested, when such use is acceptable to a highway agency.
 Please note the following standard provisions that apply to FHWA letters of acceptance:
 This acceptance is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the systems and does not cover their structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
  Any changes that may adversely influence the crashworthiness of the system will require a new acceptance letter.
  Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service performance reveals unacceptable safety problems, or that the system being marketed is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to modify or revoke our acceptance.
  You will be expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and installation requirements to ensure proper performance.
  You will be expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for acceptance, and that it will meet the crashworthiness requirements of the FHWA and the NCHRP Report 350.
  To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of acceptance is designated as number B-153A and shall not be reproduced except in full.  This letter and the test documentation upon which it is based are public information.  All such letters and documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request.
  The Nature Rail barriers are patented products and considered proprietary.  If proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects, except exempt, non-NHS projects, (a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists; or (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes.  Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411.
  This acceptance letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder.  The acceptance letter is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the candidate system, and the FHWA is neither prepared nor required to become involved in issues concerning patent law.  Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant.Sincerely yours,
  
*/* Signature of Michael S. Griffith */*
  
Michael S. Griffith
Director, Office of Safety  Technologies
Office of SafetyEnclosures U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Highway Administration**

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE

WASHINGTON, DC 20590

202-366-4000Subscribe to email updates
                    About
  

        
              About FHWA
                Careers
                Org Chart
                Staff Directories
                Work with UsPrograms
  

        
              Acquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                SafetyPolicies, Rights, Legal
  

        
              About DOT
                Accessibility
                Budget and Performance
                Civil Rights
                FOIA
                Information Quality
                No FEAR Act
                Office of Inspector General
                Privacy Policy
                USA.gov
                Web Policies and Notices
                Web StandardsNews & Events
  

        
              Newsroom
                Press Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Media Contacts
                Connect with Us