alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 294 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 294

   To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand access to 
    capital for rural-area small businesses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2023

   Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Ms. Smith, Mr. Peters, Mr. Warnock, Ms. 
 Rosen, and Mrs. Capito) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand access to 
    capital for rural-area small businesses, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding Access to Capital for 
Rural Job Creators Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR RURAL-AREA SMALL BUSINESSES.

    Section 4(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 
78d(j)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4)(C), by inserting ``rural-area small 
        businesses,'' after ``women-owned small businesses,''; and
            (2) in paragraph (6)(B)(iii), by inserting ``rural-area 
        small businesses,'' after ``women-owned small businesses,''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOHN BAX, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-194 Erie

v. )

)

WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on June 22, 2005, 

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 17], filed on July

27, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction and that a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were

allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on

Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. Petitioner was subsequently granted an

extension until August 18, 2006 in which to file objections [Doc. No. 19]. No objections

were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together

with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and a certificate of

appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 17] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on July 27, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Case 1:05-cv-00194-SJM-SPB Document 21 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00194-SJM-SPB Document 21 Filed 08/22/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[104th Congress Public Law 159]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ159.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 1411]]

Public Law 104-159
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To provide that the United States Post Office building that is to be 
located at 7436 South Exchange Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, shall be known 
          and designated as the ``Charles A. Hayes Post Office 
           Building''. <<NOTE: July 9, 1996 -  [H.R. 2704]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building that is to be located at 7436 
South Exchange Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Charles A. Hayes Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Charles A. Hayes Post Office Building''.

    Approved July 9, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2704:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 141 (1995):
                                    Dec. 19, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 142 (1996):
                                    June 27, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 00-6544.

#### Cepero *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Hooker Furniture Corporation (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paul B. Toms, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: April 12, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul B. Toms, Jr.               
|                     |  |     |  | Paul B. Toms, Jr.                   
|                     |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27793]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry


Board of Scientific Counselors, Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry; Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry (ATSDR) announces the following committee meeting.
    Name: Board of Scientific Counselors, Agency for Toxic Substances 
and Disease Registry (BSC, ATSDR).
    Times and Dates: 9 a.m.-5 p.m., November 19, 1997, and 8:30 a.m.-4 
p.m., November 20, 1997.
    Place: ATSDR, 35 Executive Park Drive, Training Room, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30329.
    Status: Open to the public, limited by the space available. The 
meeting room accommodates approximately 60 people.
    Purpose: The Board of Scientific Counselors, ATSDR, advises the 
Secretary; the Assistant Secretary for Health; and the Administrator, 
ATSDR, on ATSDR programs to ensure scientific quality, timeliness, 
utility, and dissemination of results. Specifically, the Board advises 
on the adequacy of the science in ATSDR-supported research, emerging 
problems that require scientific investigation, accuracy and currency 
of the science in ATSDR reports, and program areas to emphasize and/or 
to de-emphasize.
    Matters To Be Discussed: Agenda items will include introduction of 
members and special consultants to the Community/Tribal Subcommittee, 
updates on ATSDR medical monitoring at Hanford and Bunker Hill, ATSDR's 
methyl parathion experience, the programs and activities of the ATSDR 
Office of Urban Affairs, the Great Lakes Human Health Effects Research, 
the ATSDR Child Health Initiative, and the National Institute of 
Environmental Health Sciences Worker Safety and Training Program; a 
discussion on ATSDR/Native American cooperation; an overview for 
determining contaminant levels in water distribution systems; and a 
presentation of ATSDR's interim policy on dioxins in soil.
    Written comments are welcome and should be received by the contact 
person listed below prior to the opening of the meeting.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

CONTACT PERSONS FOR MORE INFORMATION: Charles Xintaras, Sc.D., 
Executive Secretary, BSC, ATSDR, M/S E-28, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404/639-0708.

    Dated: October 9, 1997.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-27793 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-70-P
Exhibit 10.31

FOURTH ADDENDUM TO

ADCENTER LICENSE, HOSTING AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT

This Addendum is entered into between IAC Search & Media, a Delaware corporation (Partner) and LookSmart, Ltd., a Delaware corporation
(LookSmart) and is the fourth addendum to that certain AdCenter License, Hosting and Support Agreement by and between Partner and LookSmart entered into as of May 16, 2005, as amended by the parties in three addenda effective
January 2006, May 2006, and January 2007, respectively (the Agreement).

This Fourth Addendum is effective as of June 11, 2007.

Whereas, LookSmart has developed additional functionality to its AdCenter to enable the serving of advertisements in response to the content of viewed web
pages (Contextual Ad Serving); and

Whereas, pursuant to Section 5(c) of the Agreement, LookSmart wishes to provide this Contextual Ad
Serving functionality to Partner;

Therefore, Partner and LookSmart agree as follows:

1. Delivery: LookSmart agrees that it will make Contextual Ad Serving available to Partner on June 11, 2007.

2. Service Levels: The Service Level Agreement attached to the Agreement as Exhibit A will apply to Contextual Ad Serving, except when the AdCenter is required to retrieve content from Partner Network in order to have a copy or
refresh a copy of the content.

3. Contextual Ad Serving Metrics: LookSmart will develop a system for measuring latency for those contextual ad calls
that require LookSmart to retrieve content from Partner Network in order to have a copy or refresh a copy of the content (excluding the time required for LookSmart to retrieve the content from Partner Network) (the Contextual Ad Serving
Metrics) by August 1, 2007. The Contextual Ad Serving Metrics will not be subject to the existing Service Level Agreement.

4. Except as
modified herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



|        |  |                         |  |                 |  |        |  |                                       
|------- |  | ----------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------
|Partner |  |                         |  | LookSmart, Ltd.
|        |  |                         |  |                
|By:     |  | /s/ Dominic Butera      |  |                 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Michael Schoen                    
|Name:   |  | Dominic Butera          |  |                 |  | Name:  |  | Michael Schoen                        
|Title:  |  | Chief Financial Officer |  |                 |  | Title: |  | Vice President, Product and Technology
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                             BANK ONE, TEXAS N.A.
                  Annual Officer's Certificate of the Servicer
                       Banc One Auto Grantor Trust 1997-A



     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Bank One, Texas, N.A.,
as Servicer (the "Servicer"), pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of May 31, 1997 (the "Agreement") between the
Servicer and Bankers Trust Company, as trustee (the "Trustee"), does hereby
certify as follows:

        (1) All terms used herein that are defined in the Agreement shall have
            the meanings provided in the Agreement, unless otherwise defined
            herein.

        (2) The undersigned is an officer of the Servicer who is duly authorized
            pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.

        (3) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from
            January 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999 (the "Servicing Period") and
            its performance under the Agreement has been made under my
            supervision.

        (4) Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
            fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout the
            Servicing Period except as set forth in paragraph (5) below.

        (5) The following is a brief description of each default in the
            fulfillment of the Servicer's obligations under the Agreement known
            to me to have been made by the Servicer during the Servicing
            Period, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such
            default and (ii) the current status of each default: NONE



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Servicer has caused this Certificate to be executed by a
duly authorized officer as of the 31st day of December 1999.


                              BANK ONE, TEXAS, N.A., as Servicer



                              By: /s/Tracie H. Klein
                                  ------------------------------
                                  Name:  Tracie H. Klein
                                  Title: Vice President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward F. West, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.

Date: November 3, 2009



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    Edward F. West  
|Name:  |  | Edward F. West         
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

I, Stephen C. Markowski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.

Date: November 3, 2009



|       |  |                            
|------ |  | ---------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    Stephen C. Markowski
|Name:  |  | Stephen C. Markowski       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ 09

- 21

- 00189

- CR 09

- 21

- 00190

- CR



### ________________ JOANNE SCHIWART , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No s . 18

- 29721 and 1 8

- 29722

________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Pursuant to plea bargain agreements, appellant Joanne Schiwart pleaded guilty to forgery and credit card or debit card abuse

. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 32.21; 32 .31( b ) (1) (A). In cause number 18

- 29721 , the trial court found the evidence
sufficient to find S chiwart guilty of forgery but deferred further proceedings and placed Schiwart on community supervision for five years. In cause number 18

- 29722
the trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Schiwart guilty of credit card or2 debit card abuse but deferred further proceedings and placed S chiwart on community supervision for two years. Subsequently, prior to the expiration of the terms of community supervision,
the State filed motions to revoke Schiwart’ s community supervision. In both cases,
S chiwart pleaded “true” to violating certain terms of the community supervision order. After conducting an evi dentiary hearing, the trial court found the evidence
was sufficient in both cases to find that S chiwart violated th ose terms of h er community supervision. In cause number 1 8

- 29721 , the trial court revoked
S chiwart’s community supervision, found S chiwart gu ilty of forgery , and assessed punishment at f ive years of confinement. In cause number 18

- 29722 , the trial court
revoked S chiwart’s community supervision, found S chiwart guilty of credit card or
debit card abuse , and assessed punishment at two years of con finement. The trial court ordered the sentences to run concurrently.
Schiwart’s appellate counsel filed Anders briefs that present counsel ’ s professional evaluation of the records and conclude the appeals are frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 7 38 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On August 2, 2021 , we granted an extension of time for S chiwart to file pro se briefs and notified her of the deadline for doing so . We received no response from Schiwart in either case.3 We h ave reviewed the appellate records, and we agree with counsel ’ s conclusion that no arguable issues support the appeals. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re

- brief the appeals. Cf. Stafford
v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 51 1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court ’ s judgments. 1
AFFIRMED.

________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice
Submitted on February 23, 2022 Opinion Delivered April 20, 2022 Do Not Publish Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson , JJ.

1 Schiwart may challenge our decision in these cases by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
to: Department of Energy via email: expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov

from: Jennifer Cleary, Director, Public Relations

date: October 4, 2010

subject: Ex parte Communication

This memo memorializes the call between AHAM and the Department of Energy on October 4, 

2010, for inclusion in the public docket. In summary, the issue discussed was the methodology 

for developing the standards equations proposed in DOE’s notice of proposed rulemaking on 

energy conservation standards for residential refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. 

The attendees were as follows: 

Michael Kido, Department of Energy

Subid Wagley, Department of Energy

Detlef Westphalen, Navigant Consulting

Kevin Messner, AHAM

Jennifer Cleary, AHAM

Manfred Staebler, BSH Home Appliance Corporation

David Hall, Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Allan Hall, Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Bill Brown, GE Appliances and Lighting 

Martin Severance, GE

Dick Topping, Sub-Zero

Chris Rieger, Sub-Zero

Paul Sikir, Sub-Zero

Mark Drake, Viking Range Corporation

Steve Church, Whirlpool Corporation
#### Irwin F. DAVIS and Theresa Marie Davis, his wife, Appellants, v. DEERFIELD LAKE CONDOMINIUM MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

Nos. 76-1909, 76-2030.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 26, 1977.

*1214Joseph De Gance of Jansen & De Gance, P. A., Port Lauderdale, for appellants.

Edward R. Rumin of Adams & Adams, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. The appellants, Irwin F. Davis and Theresa Marie Davis, claim the appel-lee, Deerfield Lake Condominium Management Association, Inc., has violated Section 718.112(2)(c), Florida Statutes, in failing to conduct open meetings of the Association’s board of administration and to give reasonable notice thereof. The only evidence before the trial court in considering the appel-lee’s motion for summary judgment was the testimony in deposition of the appellants. That testimony asserts violations of the statute in respect to the requirements of both reasonable notice and open meetings and precludes the entry of a summary judgment for appellee.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., and DEAN, ROY E., Associate Judge, concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jason Kellerman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



By:

/s/    Jason KellermanName:

Jason KellermanTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




I, William B. Lonergan, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



By:

/s/    William B. LonerganName:

William B. LonerganTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
#### GARDEN HILL LAND CORPORATION v. Succession of Edwin CAMBRE et al.

No. 61841.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

In re: Renette Maria Cambre applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of St. John the Baptist. 354 So.2d 1064.

Denied.
#### Leon Elmore POWE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-799.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 2, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.