alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 9
SAT (concerns) (11/19/2013):

Analogs: 

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

Migration to groundwater: Hyd Pdt Acid rapid; Hyd Pdt Alcohol rapid 

PBT rating: P1B2T2 PMN: P1B2T2; Hyd Pdt Acid: P1B1T1; Hyd Pdt 

Alcohol: P1B1T1 

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, XB Testing (Testing 

desired) 

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 3 ppb), XB Testing 

(Testing desired) 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 9
# L_2009033DE.01004902.xml

| 3.2.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 33/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 33/49

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2005/36/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 7. September 2005 über die Anerkennung von Berufsqualifikationen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 255 vom 30. September 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 255 vom 30. September 2005

Auf Seite 50, Artikel 54:

anstatt:

„Artikel 54

Führen von akademischen Titeln

Unbeschadet der Artikel 7 und 52 trägt der Aufnahmemitgliedstaat dafür Sorge, dass die betreffenden Personen zum Führen von akademischen Titeln ihres Herkunftsmitgliedstaats und gegebenenfalls der entsprechenden Abkürzung in der Sprache des Herkunftsmitgliedstaats berechtigt sind. Der Aufnahmemitgliedstaat kann vorschreiben, dass neben dieser Bezeichnung Name und Ort der Lehranstalt oder des Prüfungsausschusses aufgeführt werden, die bzw. der diesen akademischen Titel verliehen hat. Kann die Ausbildungsbezeichnung des Herkunftsmitgliedstaats im Aufnahmemitgliedstaat mit einer Bezeichnung verwechselt werden, die in Letzterem eine zusätzliche Ausbildung voraussetzt, die die betreffende Person aber nicht erworben hat, so kann der Aufnahmemitgliedstaat vorschreiben, dass die betreffende Person ihren im Herkunftsmitgliedstaat gültigen akademischen Titel in einer vom Aufnahmemitgliedstaat festgelegten Form verwendet.“

muss es heißen:

„Artikel 54

Führen von Ausbildungsbezeichnungen

Unbeschadet der Artikel 7 und 52 trägt der Aufnahmemitgliedstaat dafür Sorge, dass die betreffenden Personen zum Führen von Ausbildungsbezeichnungen ihres Herkunftsmitgliedstaats und gegebenenfalls der entsprechenden Abkürzung in der Sprache des Herkunftsmitgliedstaats berechtigt sind. Der Aufnahmemitgliedstaat kann vorschreiben, dass neben dieser Bezeichnung Name und Ort der Lehranstalt oder des Prüfungsausschusses aufgeführt werden, die bzw. der diese Ausbildungsbezeichnung verliehen hat. Kann die Ausbildungsbezeichnung des Herkunftsmitgliedstaats im Aufnahmemitgliedstaat mit einer Bezeichnung verwechselt werden, die in Letzterem eine zusätzliche Ausbildung voraussetzt, die die betreffende Person aber nicht erworben hat, so kann der Aufnahmemitgliedstaat vorschreiben, dass die betreffende Person ihre im Herkunftsmitgliedstaat gültige Ausbildungsbezeichnung in einer vom Aufnahmemitgliedstaat festgelegten Form verwendet.“

---
**Exhibit 31.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS**





I, Donald R. Katz, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Audible, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(3) and 15d-115(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and





b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:





a) A ll significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting





August 13, 2004
By:
/s/Name:
Donald R. KatzTitle:
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)
#### In re Freddie Joe OWENS (Department of Public Safety, Division of State Police).

No. 7969.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Jan. 21, 1970.

Joe J. Tritico and Warren E. Hood, Lake Charles, Howard N. Nugent, Jr., Alexandria, for appellant.

Thomas H. Watts, Baton Rouge, for ap-pellee.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Before LANDRY, SARTAIN and ELLIS, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge.

The decision of the Civil Service Commission in this case was filed with the Director of Personnel on July 22, 1969. It became final on that date. Civil Service Rules, Chapter 13, Section 28(a).

The motion for this appeal was filed with the Commission on August 25, 1969, the 34th day after the decision became final. Article XIV, § 15(0) (1) of the Constitution of 1921 requires that the application for appeal be filed “within 30 days after the Commission’s decision becomes final.”

The motion was clearly filed too late, and we are, accordingly, without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, at appellant’s cost.

Appeal dismissed.
# L_2009307DE.01000802.xml

| 21.11.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 307/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 307/8

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2005/19/EG des Rates vom 17. Februar 2005 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 90/434/EWG über das gemeinsame Steuersystem für Fusionen, Spaltungen, die Einbringung von Unternehmensteilen und den Austausch von Anteilen, die Gesellschaften verschiedener Mitgliedstaaten betreffen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 58 vom 4. März 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 58 vom 4. März 2005

Seite 27, Anhang, Buchstabe y:

anstatt:

| „y) | die Gesellschaften schwedischen Rechts mit der Bezeichnung ‚aktiebolag‘, ‚försäkringsaktiebolag‘, ‚ekonomiska föreningar‘, ‚sparbank‘, ‚ömsesidiga försäkringsbolag‘;“ |
| --- | --- |

„y)

die Gesellschaften schwedischen Rechts mit der Bezeichnung ‚aktiebolag‘, ‚försäkringsaktiebolag‘, ‚ekonomiska föreningar‘, ‚sparbank‘, ‚ömsesidiga försäkringsbolag‘;“

muss es heißen:

| „y) | die Gesellschaften schwedischen Rechts mit der Bezeichnung ‚aktiebolag‘, ‚bankaktiebolag‘, ‚försäkringsaktiebolag‘, ‚ekonomiska föreningar‘, ‚sparbank‘, ‚ömsesidiga försäkringsbolag‘;“. |
| --- | --- |

„y)

die Gesellschaften schwedischen Rechts mit der Bezeichnung ‚aktiebolag‘, ‚bankaktiebolag‘, ‚försäkringsaktiebolag‘, ‚ekonomiska föreningar‘, ‚sparbank‘, ‚ömsesidiga försäkringsbolag‘;“.

---
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 3630 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 253 - AD
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

I.    EVANS OIL OF LOUISIANA, INC.
      100% Owned Subsidiary
      Incorporated in the State of Louisiana

II.   IN & OUT MINI MART, INC.
      100% Owned Subsidiary
      Incorporated in the State of Texas

III.  DIAMOND MINI MART, INC.
      100% Owned Subsidiary of In & Out Mini Mart, Inc.
      Incorporated in the State of Texas

IV.   EVANS OIL COMPANY, INC.
      100% Owned Subsidiary
      Incorporated in the State of Texas

V.    EDCO, INC.
      19% Owned Subsidiary of Evans Systems, Inc.
      81% Owned Subsidiary of Evans Oil Company, Inc.
      Incorporated in the State of Texas

VI.   WAY ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
      100% Owned Subsidiary
      Incorporated in the State of Delaware

VII.  EDCO ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
      100% Owned Subsidiary
      Incorporated in the State of Texas

VIII. DISTRIBUTOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
      100% Owned Subsidiary
      Incorporated in the State of Texas
iA) Eastern Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle

visi ling, VA 20166-6511
US.Department Highway Division Sterling, VA 20166

of Transportation

Federal Highway
Administration

SENT VIA ELECTRONIC CORRESPONDENCE

MAY ~ 2 2013 =‘ In Reply Refer to: HFPP-15

Mr. Michael Hancock, P.E.
Secretary

Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
Office of the Secretary

200 Mero Street, 6" Floor
Frankfort, KY 40622

Subject: MAP-21 Access Program Programming Decisions Committee Members
Dear Mr. Hancock:

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141,
includes the establishment of the new Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP). This new
program will be administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Federal
Lands Highway. Kentucky is served by the Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD)
office in Sterling, Virginia.

A key requirement for implementing the FLAP is to coordinate the establishment of a three
member Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for programming the FLAP
funds allocated to each state. Each state level PDC consists of a representative from the Federal
Lands Highway Division office, the State Department of Transportation, and an organization or
entity that is suited to represent the local entities responsible for building, operating, or
maintaining transportation facilities that are located on, are adjacent to, or provide access to
Federal lands. Our program managers have coordinated with your department and have
identified the following positions that will fulfill the PDC requirement:

FLAP Program Manager, FHWA, EFLHD
Division of Program Management, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
Executive Director/CEO, Kentucky Association of Counties


Additional information on the implementation of FLAP can be found on the EFLHD MAP-21
website at http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/federal-lands-access.aspx. If you have any
questions, please contact Mr. David Payne at 571-434-1543 or David.Payne@dot.gov, or myself
at 703-404-6276 or Karen.Schmidt@dot.gov.

Sincerely yours,

ep Or Sora

Karen A. Schmidt
Director, Office of Program Administration

Qe

Mr. Denny Nunnelley, Executive Director/CEO, Kentucky Association of Counties, Frankfort,
KY

Mr. Ron Rigney, Division of Program Management, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet,
Frankfort, KY

Mr. Jose M. Sepulveda, Division Administrator, FHWA, Kentucky Division Office, Frankfort,
KY
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

I, James P. Tolley, the principal accounting officer of Agemark Corporation (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

         (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which
         this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully
         complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.

Dated: May 13,  2003                            /s/  JAMES P. TOLLEY
                                                ------------------------------
                                                James P. Tolley
                                                Treasurer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                (Principal Accounting Officer)
#### Ida Jackson, Respondent, *v.*Richard L. Baltimore, Jr., et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

January 30, 1952.

*Nathan J. Paulson*for appellants.

No appearance for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent neither appeared nor filed a brief. We are of the opinion that where an attorney is discharged by his client without cause after he has been paid a sum on account of his fee and disbursements, he may retain only an amount *210representing the reasonable value of the services actually rendered to the date of his discharge plus his disbursements. His measure of recovery is no different where he has already been paid in part or in whole for his future services than it is where he has received no such payment. In either case the measure of Ms recovery is based on the principle of *quantum meruit. (Matter of Montgomery,*272 N. Y. 323; *Mesa Co. Nat. Bank*v. *Berry,*24 Colo. App. 487 [1913].) We are not disposed to follow the ruling of the court in *Riehl*v. *Levy*(43 Misc. 59, App. Term, 1st Dept., 1904).

The judgment should be affirmed, without costs.

Fennelly, Golden and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.
#### JIM HARRELL PONTIAC, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Wallace E. LEAVINE, individually and as next friend and father of Madlyn Leavine, a minor, Appellee.

No. 69-438.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 17, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### Database for the Geologic Map of Newberry Volcano, Deschutes, Klamath, and Lake Counties, Oregon

By: Joseph A. Bard**David W. Ramsey**Norman S. MacLeodDavid R. Sherrod**Lawrence A. ChitwoodRobert A. Jensen

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds771

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**
- Database:  **Database**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-58311, 333-34645, 333-77793, 333-88671,
333-95883, 333-36982, 333-51856, 333-60500, 333-116658 and 333-81128), and in
the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-113436, 333-04717, 333-34711,
333-50391, 333-92905 and 333-89764), of ProxyMed, Inc. of our report dated March
25, 2004 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.


                                                /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
April 10, 2006
Hydraulic Institute Mission and Vision:

Vision:  To be a global authority on pumps and pumping systems.

Mission: To be a value‐adding resource to member companies and pump users worldwide by:

 Developing and delivering comprehensive industry standards.  

 Expanding knowledge by providing education and tools for the effective application, testing, installation,

operation and maintenance of pumps and pumping systems.  

 Serving as a forum for the exchange of industry information.  

The Hydraulic Institute is a non‐profit industry (trade) association established in 1917. HI and its members are

dedicated to excellence in the engineering, manufacture, and application of pumping equipment.

The Institute plays a leading role in the development of pump standards in North America and worldwide. HI

standards are developed within guidelines established by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). HI

members work through a number of technical committees to develop draft standards. The Institute uses the ANSI

Canvass Method, involving pump users and other interested parties to reach consensus on published standards. HI

standards are developed to define pump products, installation, operation, performance, testing, and pump life and

quality. ANSI/HI standards are widely referenced in other standards such as those of API, AWWA, ANSI B73, and

more are accepted throughout North America and applied worldwide. Most major U.S. pump manufacturers are

active members.

Website:  www.Pumps.org
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ARNOLD LAWSON, )

Petitioner ) Civil Action No. 06-158 Erie

) District Judge McLaughlin

v. ) Magistrate Judge Baxter

)

U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, )

Respondent. )

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2006, after Petitioner presented a petition for a writ

of habeas corpus which he seeks leave to prosecute in forma pauperis, and it appearing that he

has had average monthly deposits of $ 137.50 in his account at the Federal Correctional

Institution at McKean in Bradford, Pennsylvania, during the past six months, which sum far

exceeds the $5.00 filing fee required to commence this action, and it further appearing that

requiring the Petitioner to pay the filing fee will not deprive him of any necessities of life at the

prison, 

It is recommended that leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied.

Petitioner shall have ten (10) days from the date of service in which to file written

objections to this Report and Recommendation. Failure to file timely objections may constitute a

waiver of any appellate rights.

S/Susan Paradise Baxter 

 SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge

cc: Arnold Lawson # 14358-054

 FCI McKean 

P.O. Box 8000

Bradford, PA 16701

Case 1:06-cv-00158-SJM-SPB Document 2 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 13, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20394

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ADESHINA OLANREWAJU LAWAL

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CR-517-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Adeshina Olanrewaju Lawal appeals his convictions and sentences for

attempting bank fraud, possessing a forged or counterfeit security, and aiding

and abetting the same. He argues that the district court erred by denying his

requested jury instruction on the defense of entrapment; enhancing his sentence

for obstruction of justice; and enhancing his sentence because a substantial

portion of his fraudulent scheme occurred outside of the United States.
No. 06-20394

2

The district court was not required to instruct Lawal’s jury on the defense

of entrapment. Although Lawal’s trial testimony indicated that he was

pressured by a Government informant during the course of his offense, Lawal

unequivocally stated that he agreed to participate in the offense only after a

third party threatened his life. Lawal did not make a prima facie showing of

evidence sufficient to support a reasonable jury's finding of entrapment.

See United States v. Ogle, 328 F.3d 182, 185-88 (5th Cir. 2003). 

The district court did not err by enhancing Lawal’s sentence pursuant to

U.S.S.G.§ 3C1.1 for obstruction of justice. The district court’s finding that

Lawal’s sworn post-arrest statement and Lawal’s trial testimony were

inconsistent was plausible in light of the record as a whole. See United States

v. Creech, 408 F.3d 264, 270 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 777 (2005).

Committing perjury is conduct for which the enhancement may be applied. Id.

at 270-71; § 3C1.1, comment. (n.4(b)).

Finally, the district court did not err by enhancing Lawal’s sentence

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(9)(B), based on a finding that a substantial part

of his fraudulent scheme was committed from outside the United States. The

finding was plausible in light of the record read as a whole.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001078352
<NAME>                        Fundae Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Oct-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         16,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,000
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,737
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       140
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20,237)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
#### Charles D. JACKSON, Administrator of the Estate of Charles Ray Jackson, Deceased, v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF RAILROAD COMPANY and C. L. Womack.

No. 49532.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 31, 1977.

James E. Lever, Charles A. Ray, Jr., Haz-lehurst, for appellant.

Richard E. Stratton, III, Brookhaven, for appellees.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Copiah County; Joe N. Pigott, Judge.

Before INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and SUGG, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.