alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 96-1226 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INVESTMENT 

 Treaty Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and LATVIA 

Signed at Washington January 13, 1995 

with 

Annex 

and 

Protocol 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 LATVIA 

 Investment 

Treaty signed at Washington January 13, 1995; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate July 10, 1995 (Treaty Doc. 104-12, 

 104th Congress, 1st Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 March 27, 1996 (Senate Executive Report No. 104-16, 

 104th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 June 27, 1996; 

Ratified by the President September 12, 1996; 

Exchange of instruments of ratification at Riga 

 November 26, 1996; 

Entered into force December 26, 1996. 

With annex and protocol. 



























Note: The reference in the first paragraph on this page to "panta 3" should read "panta 1".
259 La. 64

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Bernard ALFONSO v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51520.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1971.

In re: Bernard Alfonso applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing' made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of either our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSRS

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-2743 |
|------------------------------------|----------|

 

DWS Strategic Income Fund

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 10/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 04/30/09 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1,711,752
<SECURITIES>                                   597,973
<RECEIVABLES>                                  912,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                   147,299
<INVENTORY>                                    1,117,883
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,522,370
<PP&E>                                         960,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                 203,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,981,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,950,885
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       62,311
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,818,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,981,293
<SALES>                                        3,202,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,207,309
<CGS>                                          1,587,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,031,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             146,207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,553,449)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,553,449)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                84,702
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,639,151)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT EARTHMAN, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-188 Erie

v. )

)

JAMES F. SHERMAN, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on June 16, 2005,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 12], filed on July

27, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed and that a certificate of

appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of

service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on

Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and

documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following

order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 12] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on July 27, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00188-SJM-SPB Document 13 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Helene WEINSTEIN, Petitioner, v. Nellie BRINSON, Respondent.

No. 40134.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 18, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 237"So.2d 211.

ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, and McCAIN, JJ., concur; Roberts, C. J., DREW and BOYD, JJ., dissent.
##### 



Exhibit 32

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Net Perceptions, Inc.
(the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas
M. Donnelly, as President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas M. Donnelly
|                      
|Name:                  |  | Thomas M. Donnelly                   
|Title:                 |  | President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                  |  | August 14, 2003                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
_________________

_________________ 1 (Slip Opinion) Cite as: 584 U. S. ____ (2018)
Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash

ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. 

# SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 16–1495 

### CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, PETITIONER v. MATTHEW JACK DWIGHT VOGT ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT [May 29, 2018] 

### P ER 

### C URIAM



### . The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered.

J USTICE 

### G ORSUCH 

### took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit 13.2


             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is submitted in connection with Futuremedia
PLC's Form 20-F annual report for fiscal year ended April 30, 2004 (the
"Report") pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act') for purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Peter Machin, Chief Accounting Officer of Futuremedia PLC, certify that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Futuremedia PLC.

Date:    September 28, 2004

/s/ Peter Machin
--------------------------------------
Peter Machin, Chief Accounting Officer
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

N O

. 09

- 20

- 001 81

- CV

__________________

IN THE INTEREST OF I.E.

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 279t h District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C

- 237,025

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

S.E. (Father) appeals from an order terminating his parental rights to his minor

child, I.E. For a trial court to terminate a parent’s right s to his children, the State

must prove by clear and convincing evidence (1) that the parent committed an act

prohibited under section 161.001(1) of the Texas Family Code and (2) that

terminating the parent’s rights is in the children’s best interest. See Tex. Fam. Code

Ann. § 161.001(b)(1)

- (2). Here, the parties tried the case to the bench, and the trial

court found clear and convincing evidence supported the Department of Family and

Protective Service ’ s allegations claiming Father’s rights should be terminated based2 on several grounds in section 161. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001(b)(1)(D),

(E), (O), (P). The trial cour t also found that terminating Father’s rights is in I.E.’s

best interest. See id. § 161.001(b)(2).

Father then appeal ed from the trial court’s order terminating his parental rights

to I.E. Subsequently, Father’s court

- appointed appellate counsel submitted a brief in

which counsel contends that no arguable grounds can be advanced to support

Father’s appeal

. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In the Interest of

L.D.T. , 161 S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.

— Beaumont 2005, no pet.). The brief

provides coun sel’s professional evaluation of the record. Counsel served Father with

a copy of the Anders brief filed on his behalf. After Father’s counsel filed the Anders

brief, the Court notified Father of his right to file a pro se response, and the deadline

to do so

. Father did not respond to the Court’s notice.

We have independently reviewed the appellate record. Based on the record

before us, we find any appeal would be frivolous as there is no arguable error that

would require the Court to h ave another attorney appoint ed to re

- brief Father ’s

appeal

. Cf. Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). For these

reasons, w e affirm the trial court’s order terminating Father’s parental rights.

A FFIRMED.

_________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice3 Submitted on October 19, 2020

Opinion Delivered November 19, 2020

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 30 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.30

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty three

                                 An Act

 
   To authorize major medical facility projects for the Department of 
     Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2023, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Fiscal Year 2023 Veterans Affairs 
Major Medical Facility Authorization Act''.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF MAJOR MEDICAL FACILITY PROJECTS OF DEPARTMENT 
OF VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may carry out 
the following major medical facility projects in fiscal year 2023 at 
the locations specified and in an amount for each project not to exceed 
the amount specified for such location:
        (1) Construction of a community-based outpatient clinic and 
    national cemetery in Alameda, California, in an amount not to 
    exceed $395,000,000.
        (2) Construction of a community living center and renovation of 
    domiciliary and outpatient facilities in Canandaigua, New York, in 
    an amount not to exceed $506,400,000.
        (3) Construction of a new health care center in El Paso, Texas, 
    in an amount not to exceed $700,000,000.
        (4) Seismic upgrade and specialty care improvements in Fort 
    Harrison, Montana, in an amount not to exceed $88,600,000.
        (5) Realignment and closure of the Livermore campus in 
    Livermore, California, in an amount not to exceed $490,000,000.
        (6) Construction of a new medical facility in Louisville, 
    Kentucky, in an amount not to exceed $1,013,000,000.
        (7) Seismic retrofit and renovation, roadway and site 
    improvements, construction of a new specialty care facility, 
    demolition, and expansion of parking facilities in Portland, 
    Oregon, in an amount not to exceed $523,000,000.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized

  
 to be appropriated to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for fiscal 
year 2023 or the year in which funds are appropriated for the 
Construction, Major Projects account, $3,716,000,000 for the projects 
authorized in subsection (a).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit (h)(6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Financial Services Firm (“you” or “Intermediary”),

 

As principal underwriter of the DWS Funds, we (or a predecessor firm) or our affiliate have entered into a selling group or other agreement or agreements (the "Agreement") with you to permit you, as applicable, to sell, service, or facilitate trading in shares of the DWS Funds (collectively, the "Shares").  

 

This amendment to the Agreement is entered into as of the date indicated in the signature block below, with an effective date of October 16, 2007, or such earlier date as of which you begin providing the Shareholder information described below, and includes the following provisions: 

 

**1. Agreement to Provide Information.**Intermediary agrees to provide the Fund, upon written request, the taxpayer identification number (“TIN”), the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (“ITIN”), or other government-issued identifier (“GII”), if known, of any or all Shareholder(s) of the account and the amount, date, name or other identifier of any investment professional(s) associated with the Shareholder(s) or account (if known), and transaction type (purchase, redemption, transfer, or exchange) of every purchase, redemption, transfer, or exchange of Shares held through each account maintained by the Intermediary during the period covered by the request.

 

**2. Period Covered by Request.**Requests must set forth a specific period, not to exceed 90 days from the date of the request, for which transaction information is sought. The Fund may request transaction information older than 90 days from the date of the request as it deems necessary to investigate compliance with policies established by the Fund for the purpose of eliminating or reducing any dilution of the value of the outstanding shares issued by the Fund.

 

**3. Form and Timing of Response.**

 

(a)  Intermediary agrees to provide, promptly upon request of the Fund or its designee, the requested information specified in paragraph 1 above. If requested by the Fund or its designee, Intermediary agrees to use best efforts to determine promptly whether any specific person about whom it has received the identification and transaction information specified in paragraph 1 is itself a financial intermediary (“indirect intermediary”) and, upon further request of the Fund or its designee, promptly either (i) provide 

 

----
#### Patricia P. BOLING and St. Petersburg Bank and Trust Company, as Executive of the Estate of R. Lee Boling, deceased, Petitioners, v. Myrtle BARNES and G. G. Boling, Respondents.

No. 38236.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 30, 1969.

William L. Johnson, of Harrison, Greene, Mann, Davenport, Rowe & Stanton, St. Petersburg, for petitioners.

William E. Nodine, of Richards, Nodine, Gilkey, Fite & Meyer, Clearwater, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District reported at 216 So.2d 804, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this Court and other District Courts of Appeal.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS, and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, C. J., dissents.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 316 

To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against Iraq. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. KAINE (for himself, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mr. LEE, Mr. COONS, Mr. PAUL, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. 

DAINES, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. KING, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. 

MURPHY, Mr. MORAN, Mr. LUJA ́N, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 

BRAUN, Mr. BOOKER, and Ms. LUMMIS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against 

Iraq. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILI4 TARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION. 

5 The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

6 Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102–1; 105 Stat. 3; 50 

7 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby repealed. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 316 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY 

2 FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002. 

3 The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

4 Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107–243; 116 Stat. 

5 1498; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby repealed. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Paul W. HOFFMANN et al., Appellants, v. DELRAY BEACH WHITEHOUSE APTS., INC., etc., Appellee.

No. 69-686.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 14, 1972.

Ordered, upon mandate of the Supreme Court of Florida issued January 28, 1972, and now lodged in this court, that the mandate of this court issued January 29, 1971, is hereby withdrawn; the opinion and judgment of this court filed December 11, 1970, 242 So.2d 769, is hereby vacated; the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida, 257 So.2d 550, filed January 26, 1972, is made the opinion and judgment of this court; and the order appealed is hereby affirmed.
PUBLIC LAW 104–189—AUG. 20, 1996 110 STAT. 1931

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3834:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

July 30, considered and passed House.

Aug. 2, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–189

104th Congress

An Act

To redesignate the Dunning Post Office in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Roger P.

McAuliffe Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The Dunning Post Office, located at 6441 West Irving Park

Road, Chicago, Illinois, shall be redesignated and known as the

‘‘Roger P. McAuliffe Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States Post

Office referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Roger P. McAuliffe Post Office’’.

Approved August 20, 1996.

Aug. 20, 1996

[H.R. 3834]