alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### IRVING TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee In Bankruptcy of SONORA PRODUCTS CORPORATION OF AMERICA (formerly Known as Acoustic Products Company), a Delaware Corporation, Bankrupt, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Percy L. DEUTSCH et al., Defendants, and Harris Hammond and Victor C. Bell, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 206.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Feb. 1, 1937.

See, also, 73 F.(2d) 121.

Sapinsley & Lukas, of New York City (Edwin J. Lukas, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Harris Hammond.

Ernst, Gale, Bernays & Falk, of New .York City (Murray C. Bernays and Abraham Friedman, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3126 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3126

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four

                                 An Act

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to furnish or replace a headstone, marker, or medallion 
for the grave of an eligible Medal of Honor recipient regardless of the 
    recipient's dates of service in the Armed Forces, and for other 
                                purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Mark Our Place Act''.
SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED HEADSTONE, 
MARKER, OR MEDALLION FOR MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENTS.
    (a) In General.--Section 2306(d)(5)(C) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
        (1) by striking clause (i);
        (2) in clause (ii), by inserting ``(except that subparagraph 
    (B)(i) of such paragraph shall not apply)'' after ``paragraph 
    (4)''; and
        (3) by redesignating clauses (ii) and (iii) as clauses (i) and 
    (ii), respectively.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Section 2306(d)(5) of such title is 
amended by striking ``section 491'' both places it appears and 
inserting ``section 2732''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
No. 00-7314.

#### Gangale *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NO. 07-06-0479-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 30, 2008

______________________________

JUAN A. SOLIS, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 242 DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; ND

NO. B16671-0602; HON. ED SELF, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Pending before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant and

his attorney have both signed the motion. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this

Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is

dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue

forthwith.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
II 

Calendar No. 25 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 316 

To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against Iraq. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. KAINE (for himself, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mr. LEE, Mr. COONS, Mr. PAUL, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. 

DAINES, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. KING, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. 

MURPHY, Mr. MORAN, Mr. LUJA ́N, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 

BRAUN, Mr. BOOKER, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. REED, Mr. VANCE, Mr. 

MERKLEY, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. SCHATZ, and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Relations 

MARCH 8, 2023 

Reported by Mr. MENENDEZ, without amendment 

A BILL 

To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against 

Iraq. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 316 RS

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILI2 TARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION. 

3 The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

4 Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102–1; 105 Stat. 3; 50 

5 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby repealed. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY 

7 FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002. 

8 The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

9 Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107–243; 116 Stat. 

10 1498; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby repealed. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 25 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 316 

A BILL 

To repeal the authorizations for use of military 

force against Iraq. 

MARCH 8, 2023 

Reported without amendment 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 14.1
                                                                     -----------

                        N-Viro International Corporation

                                 Code of Ethics

     The  Board of Directors has determined that the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company hold important and elevated roles in
corporate  governance.  While  members of the management team, they are uniquely
capable  and  empowered  to  ensure  that  all  stakeholders'  interests  are
appropriately  balanced, protected and preserved.  This Code provides principles
to  which  these  individuals  are expected to adhere and advocate.  They embody
rules  regarding  individual  and  peer  responsibilities  to  the  Company, the
Company's  clients  and  shareholders.  Violations  of  the  Code  of Ethics may
subject  the  officer  to  censure,  suspension  or  termination.

     Each  of  the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer shall, at
all  times:

1.     Act  with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of
interest  in personal and professional relationships.  All material transactions
and relationships involving a potential conflict of interest between the Company
and  the  Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer must be approved in
advance  by  the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Company.

2.     Provide  full,  fair,  accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in
reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the Securities
and  Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by the Company.
3.     Comply  with  applicable  rules  and  regulations  of  federal,  state,
provincial  and  local  governments,  and  other  appropriate private and public
regulatory  agencies.

4.     Act  in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence,
without  misrepresenting  material facts or allowing his independent judgment to
be  subordinated.

5.     Respect  the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of his
work  except  when  authorized  or  otherwise  legally  obligated  to  disclose.
Confidential  information  acquired  in the course of his work shall not be used
for  personal  advantage.

6.     Share  knowledge  and  maintain  skills  important  and  relevant  to the
Company's  needs.

7.     Proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among peers
in  his  work  environment.

8.     Achieve  responsible  use  of  and  control  over  all Company assets and
resources  employed  or  entrusted  to  him.

9.     Report  promptly  known  or  suspected  violations  of  this  Code to the
Chairman  of  the  Audit  Committee.

     Each  waiver  of  a  provision  of  this  Code of Ethics, and each material
transaction  and  relationship  involving  a  conflict  of  interest between the
Company  and  the  Chief  Executive  Officer or Chief Financial Officer which is
approved  by  the  Board of Directors, must be disclosed in the periodic reports
filed  by  the  Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to
the  rules  of  the  Commission.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 30, 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00694- CR

BRODERICK RECHARD STOKES , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1159870

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A ppellant Broderick Rechard Stokes pleaded guilty to theft. The trial court sentenced him on May 21, 2008, to 300 days’ confinement in state jail. Appellant
filed a notice of appeal from the judgment on July 27, 2018

. We lack jurisdiction over this appea l because the notice of appeal was n ot filed timely. A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within t h irty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements2

of Rule 26 .2 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed more than ten years after the sentence was imposed. Therefore, the appeal was not timely perfected.
Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Donovan, Wise, and Jewell

. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### Ewart MAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-806.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 20, 1970.

Ewart May, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ON PAGES
THREE THROUGH FIVE OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-25-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          28,770
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     55,945
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,725
<PP&E>                                         236,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 502,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,262
<BONDS>                                        275,576
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   502,176
<SALES>                                        938,506
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               938,506
<CGS>                                          667,043
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  236,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,550)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (583)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,444)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,577)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Jesse S. CHERRY, Appellant, v. William H. McCLELLAN, Appellee.

No. 70-171.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 12, 1971.

William W. Fernandez, of Law, Inc., and Malory B. Frier, Tampa, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.

MANN, J., dissents with opinion.

MANN, Judge

(dissenting).

Appellant obtained a release from appel-lee on a form provided by the Financial Responsibility Division of the office of the State Treasurer and Insurance Commissioner. Later, appellee’s insurance carrier, as subrogee, brought an action in his name seeking damages. Appellant did not answer, and judgment was entered by default. A few months later she filed a petition asserting that she was a Negro female ignorant of the law and procedure involved and that she had a release, which she attached, which led her to believe that the judgment against her was entered unjustly. I agree.

Any citizen is entitled to assume that a full release, executed on a form provided for the purpose, absolves her of liability, and one who is ignorant of legal procedures may think herself on sound ground in ignoring the complaint served on her. While this neglect would not be excusable in a lawyer, it certainly would be as to the unlearned citizen possessed of a release duly executed, and the petition should have been granted. Our Supreme Court has made it clear that “if there be any reasonable doubt in the matter [of vacating a default], it should be resolved in favor of granting the application and allowing a trial upon the merits of the case.” North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, Fla.1962, 143 So.2d 849.

I would reverse.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52535-52536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-768-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Application To Abandon 
Facilities

October 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 23, 1997, Williams Natural Gas 
Company (WNG) filed an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the 
Natural Gas Act, requesting permission and approval to abandon by 
reclaim a 1,000 horsepower rental compressor unit and appurtenant 
facilities, all as more fully set forth in this request which is on 
file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Specifically, WNG seeks authority to abandon by reclaim the 1,000 
horsepower skid-mounted Waukesha rental compressor unit and 
appurtenances originally installed in the Elk City storage field in 
Montgomery County, Kansas, to recapture migrating storage gas produced 
by gas wells outside the storage field. WNG estimates the cost to 
reclaim the facilities to be $45,575.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said request should on or before October 23, 1997, file 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in 
accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211) the Regulations under the 
Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission 
will be considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be 
taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties

[[Page 52536]]

to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding 
or to participate as a party in any hearing therein must file a motion 
to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that the request should be granted. If a motion for leave to 
intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its motion believes 
that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such hearing will 
be duly given.
    Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
it will be unnecessary for WNG to appear or be represented at the 
hearing.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26581 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6308

RYRICKA NIKITA CUSTIS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

EARL BARKSDALE, Warden Red Onion State Prison; M. YOUNCE, A Building 

Unit Manager Red Onion State Prison; I. EDWARDS, Records Department Red 

Onion State Prison; P. HARLESS, Medical Department Red Onion State Prison; E. 

SOWARDS,

 Defendants - Appellees,

and

HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA DOC; H. SMITH, Doctor Red Onion State 

Prison,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:16-cv-00391-EKD-RSB)

Submitted: June 20, 2018 Decided: June 27, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Ryricka Nikita Custis, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Ryricka Nikita Custis appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion 

for summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Custis v. Barksdale, No. 7:16-cv-00391-EKD-RSB 

(W.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Searched for **http://www.fdic.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.fdic.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-82982, 33-97024, 333-25769, 333-49497, 333-51657, 333-59245, 333-94187, 333-50874, 333-108109, 333-111464, 333-127708, 333-129166, 333-135054, 333-142564,
333-142566) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-29059, 333-29975, 333-34119, 333-56749, 333-56747, 333-80623, 333-38490, 333-38494, 333-91468, 333-91470, 333-106066, 333-117923, 333-38484, 333-159510) of GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc. of our report dated
March 12, 2010 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading Selected
Financial Data in this Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|Boston, Massachusetts         
|March 12, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT FORD, : Civil Action No. 4:14-CV-1780

:

:

Plaintiff, : (Judge Brann)

:

v. : (Magistrate Judge Schwab) 

:

JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et. al., :

:

:

 Defendants. :

ORDER

April 13, 2015 

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the thorough report and

recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Court finds that after reviewing the

well known ‘Poulis factors,’ dismissal is the appropriate sanction for failure to

prosecute and failure to comply with a court order pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 41(b). See Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 747 F.2d

863 (3d Cir. 1984). 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1.

1. The March 11, 2015 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Susan E. Schwab is ADOPTED. ECF No. 25. 

2. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute and

1

Case 4:14-cv-01780-MWB Document 26 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 2
failure to comply with a court order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

3. The clerk is directed to close the case file. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

 United States District Judge

2

Case 4:14-cv-01780-MWB Document 26 Filed 04/13/15 Page 2 of 2
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4168

_____________________________
T YEHIMBA F ORT , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Du val County

. Angela M. Cox , Judge

. September 14, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and R OWE , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_______ ______________________2 Tyehimba Fort, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 10.5
                               [Rycom Letterhead]

February 7, 2003
Mr. Hal Schultz Security Bancorp Inc.
#3 Bldg F. 5508 First Street SE
Calgary Alberta
T2H  2W9

Dear Hal,

Rycom Inc. was officially appointed as the Canadian representative for Hypercom,
late last year. As such, we represent their company and products to the Canadian
marketplace. We assumed all contractual obligations, including the purchase
agreement you signed with Hypercom Canada in January 2002.

Rycom is pleased to extend the terms and conditions of that contract for another
full year commencing today. We look forward to working with you and your staff
to achieve your Hypercom goals, both now and in the future.

Yours truly,

Dan Crowe
VP Sales
Rycom Inc.
djc