alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 340 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 340

  To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to modify the definition of 
                 franchise fee, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2023

Mr. Markey (for himself, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. 
   Cardin, Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. Hirono, Mr. King, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. 
Merkley, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Schatz, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Smith, 
 Ms. Warren, Mr. Welch, and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to modify the definition of 
                 franchise fee, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Community Television 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFYING THE DEFINITION OF FRANCHISE FEE.

    Section 622(g)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
542(g)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``includes'' and inserting ``means''; and
            (2) by inserting ``other monetary'' before ``assessment''.
                                 <all>
```
Readable Scans and Copies

All electronic documents need to be verified that they are readable and complete prior to filing in 

OneNote/Binders. 

A readable and complete scan/copy includes:

• All pages are accounted for (look to see that all pages have been provided)

• Clear Margins on the pages (look to see that text has not be cut off of the scan)

• Readable text on all pages

Figure 1Example of a poor scan/copy

Scan cuts off 

the edge of 

document 

Text is washed 

out and hard to 

read.
================================================================================


Exhibit 13.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Gemstar  Resources Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the period ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.      The Report fully complies with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of operations of the
        Company.


Date:  November 24, 2006

/s/ Linda Smith
---------------------------------------
Linda Smith, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Executive Officer of the company (or equivalent) with the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used by any person
or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.


                                       /s/ Mark E. Scott
                                       -----------------
                                       Mark E. Scott
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       November 15, 2004
#### In re ESTATE of Dorothy ROBILLARD, Deceased,

No. 72-1355.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 31, 1973.

Richard I. Manas, Miami, for appellant.

Russell M. Yates, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

CARROLL, Judge.

The appellant Anita Smillie is a judgment creditor of the beneficiary under the decedent’s will which is in the process of probate. The appellant moved for an order of distribution, to be made directly to her in payment of her judgment, of or out of the proceeds of the estate to which the judgment debtor would be entitled to distribution. The motion was denied and this appeal followed.

The trial court correctly held the judgment creditor was not entitled to proceed, as was done here, in the probate court for distribution. See In re: Francis’ Estate, 153 Fla. 360, 14 So.2d 803, 808; 26A C.J.S. Descent and Distribution § 142.

The order appealed from is affirmed.
#### Shepard BROAD and Morris N. Broad, as Chairman and President respectively, of American Savings and Loan Association of Miami Beach, Appellants, v. E. D. C. REALTY COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-129.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 17, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 42


### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/10 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 10 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.56 N 76.20 WMeters AGL
#### Ellis William ISREL, Petitioner, v. George L. GERHARDT, et al., Respondents.

No. 39706.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 8, 1970.

Rehearing Denied July 9, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 234 So.2d 172.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### MILLER’S THRIFTWAY STORES, INC., Appellant, v. Iris M. HOHNSBEEN, Appellee.

No. M-195.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 10, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 3, 1970.

Dawson, Galant, Maddox, Boyer, Sulik & Nichols, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Angus W. Harriett, Palatka, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Jenkins v. Brackin, 171 So.2d 589 (Fla.App.2nd, 1965).

JOHNSON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ„ concur.
### &EPA ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE FOR STAGE II VEHICLE REFUELING CONTROL PROGRAMS

OFFICE OF MOBILE SOURCES
#### Esther Gratt, Plaintiff, *v.*Joseph I. Gratt, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County,

September 13, 1952.

*836
      *Ralph Goldstein*for plaintiff.

*Frank Rosenblum*for defendant.

Breitel, J.

Plaintiff wife (Esther) moves for temporary alimony and counsel fee in her action for divorce. The corespondent named in the action is defendant’s first wife, Fannie, whom he divorced in Arkansas in 1947, after a marriage of twenty-seven years. Immediately after that divorce he and Esther were married. Subsequently Fannie procured a declaratory judgment in this court entered March 27,1950, to the effect that the Arkansas divorce was void and that she was defendant’s lawful wife. A few days later defendant left Esther and took up his residence with Fannie.

The motion is resisted on the ground that the New York judgment declared Fannie (not Esther) to be defendant’s lawful wife, and that Esther is therefore not entitled to alimony. Defendant urges also that Esther has no reasonable probability of success in this action because no adultery can be established, this court having declared Fannie to be his lawful wife.

Plaintiff relies on *Krause*v. *Krause*(282 N. Y. 355) which held that a defendant in a separation action is precluded from asserting that the judgment of divorce from a former wife which he obtained was void and did not give him the freedom to remarry which he appeared to possess.

The existence of the New York declaratory judgment is not such a circumstance as would prevent the application to this case of the principle of *Krause*v. *Krause.*Esther was not a party to that action and is not personally bound. The answer to defendant’s argument that he is not Esther’s husband is found in the opinion of the court in the *Krause*case:

‘ *‘*Nothing in this decision should be taken to mean that because the defendant may not in these proceedings avail himself of the invalidity of his Nevada decree he is not the husband of his first wife. On the contrary, the very theory that defendant is precluded in *these*proceedings presupposes that the true situation is the contrary of that which he may show in the case at bar.” (282 N. Y. 360.)

The suggestion in plaintiff’s brief (but not in the affidavits) that the declaratory judgment was obtained by collusion between defendant and Fannie need not be considered. That judgment is not binding on this plaintiff and defendant is estopped to assert the invalidity of the Arkansas divorce, on which invalidity the declaratory judgment was based.

*837As prescribed by the court in *Krause*v. *Krause (supra),*the needs of the first wife will be taken into account in arriving at the ability of defendant to support plaintiff.

Accordingly, this motion is granted. Temporary alimony is fixed at $25 a week. Counsel fee is fixed at $250, payable one half within ten days of service of the order herein and the balance when the action appears upon the Ready Day Calendar for trial. Settle order.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the following National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    The meeting will be open to the public to provide concept review of 
proposed contract or grant solicitations.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
inform the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

    Name of Panel: Heart and Vascular Diseases Research 
Opportunities.
    Dates of Meeting: March 26, 1997.
    Time of Meeting: 8:30 a.m.
    Place of Meeting: NIH, Building 31, C Wing, Conference Room 6, 
31 Center Drive, Bethesda Maryland 20892.
    Agenda: Discussion of Future Initiatives with Emphasis on 
Critical Health Care Needs and Research Opportunities Related to 
Heart and Vascular Diseases.
    Contact Person: Frank Altieri, Ph.D., NHLBI/DHVD, Two Rockledge 
Center, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Rm. 9166, MSC 7940, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-0494.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health.)

    Dated: January 29, 1997.
Paula N. Hayes,
Acting Committee management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-2725 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Harry GROMER, Appellant, v. Einer ECK, Appellee.

No. 68-547.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Nov. 12, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27199]



[[Page 53617]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-407-001]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

October 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 3, 1997, William Natural Gas Company 
(WNG), tendered for filing to become part of the FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with the 
proposed effective date of August 1, 1997:

Substitute First Revised Sheet Nos. 8E and 8F

    WNG states that it made a filing in Docket Nos. RP97-407, et al., 
on July 1, 1997 to submit its third quarter 1997 report of take-or-pay 
buyout, buydown and contract reformation costs and gas supply related 
transition costs, and the application or distribution of those costs 
and refunds. In preparation of the fourth quarter report, WNG 
discovered two new firm contracts had gone into effect on July 1, 1997, 
but had not been finalized when the third quarter report was made.
    WNG states that the instant filing is being made to revise Schedule 
4 of the original failing to reflect the new contracts. All other 
aspects of WNG's July 1 filing are unchanged.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all participants 
listed on the service lists maintained by the Commission in the dockets 
referenced above and on all of WNG's jurisdictional customers and 
interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27199 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)

In connection with the Annual Report of Rural/Metro Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kristine B. Ponczak, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 8, 2010



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    KRISTINE B. PONCZAK                       
|Kristine B. Ponczak                              
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Hills, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2006
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/ David B. Hills     
|Name:              |  | David B. Hills         
|Title:             |  | Chief Executive Officer

I, John Simonelli, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2006
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/ John Simonelli     
|Name:              |  | John Simonelli         
|Title:             |  | Chief Financial Officer
Transportation Safety Planning and the 

Zero Deaths Vision: 

A Guide for Metropolitan 

Planning Organizations and 

Local Communities 

The Federal Highway Administration has published a new 

resource, Transportation Safety Planning and the Zero Deaths 

Vision: A Guide for Metropolitan Planning Organizations and Local 

Communities, which provides references to key information for 

metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) and local 

communities to understand and use the safety planning process to 

work toward the zero deaths vision. 

This new guide is a useful resource for MPOs, local communities, 

and affiliated transportation agencies and stakeholders new to the 

transportation safety planning process. Stakeholders within the 

following sectors can benefit from this guide: 

 Engineering 

 Emergency services 

 Law enforcement 

 Judiciary 

 Economic development 

 Planning 

 Community outreach 

 Public health 

 Education 

 Legislation/Policy 

 Private sector/consulting 

 Research 

This easy-to-use reference helps to support the development, 

implementation, and evaluation of performance-based strategic 

safety plans for MPOs and local communities. It provides 

noteworthy practices and examples from other strategic safety 

planning efforts, including links to detailed references and 

resources. MPOs and communities can tailor the information in 

the Guide for their specific needs and context. 

For more information on the Guide and how to access it, please 

visit: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/tsp/

If you have any questions, please contact: 

Chimai Ngo

FHWA, Office of Safety 

Chimai.Ngo@dot.gov

202-366-1231 

FHWA-SA-18-069
#### Elaine B. READY, Petitioner, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Respondent.

No. 40567.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 6, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
#### Dorothy (Casey) REDD v. WATSON CHEVROLET, INC. (formerly named Roberts Chevrolet, Inc.)

No. 50183.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 22, 1978.

Laurence Y. Mellen, Cleveland, for appellant.

Campbell & DeLong, Roy D. Campbell, Jr., Greenville, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Bolivar County; J. C. Feduccia, Judge.

Before.PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 190 (Wednesday, October 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51493-51494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26012]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on 
Reactor Fuels, Onsite Fuel Storage, and Decommissioning

Postponement

    A meeting of the ACRS Subcommittee on Reactor Fuels, Onsite Fuel 
Storage, and Decommissioning scheduled to be held on October 9, 1997, 
in Room T-2 B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, has been 
postponed due to the unavailability of documents. Notice of this 
meeting was published in the Federal Register on September 22, 1997 (62 
FR 49541). Rescheduling of this meeting will be announced in a future 
Federal Register Notice. For further information contact: Dr. Medhat 
El-Zeftawy, the cognizant ACRS staff engineer (telephone 301-415-6889) 
between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (edt).

[[Page 51494]]

    Dated: September 25, 1997.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-26012 Filed 9-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Committee for Small Business Industrial Innovation; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Small Business Industrial 
Innovation (SBIR)-(61).
    Date and Time: January 22-23, 1997, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Place: Room 1235, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Contact Person: Cheryl Albus, SBIR Program Coordinator, (703) 
306-1390, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Committee: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning research programs pertaining to the small business 
community.

Agenda

January 22, 1997, Room 1235

8:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.--Welcome and Introductions
8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon--Review and Discussion of Programs
    <bullet>SBIR Phase I
    <bullet>SBIR Phase II
    <bullet>STTR Phase I/II
12:00 noon to 1:30 p.m.--Lunch
1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.--Discussion of Program Issues
3:30 p.m. to 3:45 p.m.--Break
3:45 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.--Further Discussions
5:00--Adjourn

January 23, 1996--Room 1235

8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.--Preparation of Committee Report
10:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.--Break
10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.--Feedback from Committee
12:30 p.m.--Adjourn

    Dated: December 30, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-27 Filed 1-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M