1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

 Washington, D.C. 20590

July 30, 2012

FHWA: HSST: WLongstreet: x60087:7/23/12: sf. Revised: 7/26/12

File: h://directory folder/HSST/ CC-121_Quad Guard M10 TL2_071212 

newest letter format_wpl072012.docx

In Reply Refer To:

HSST/CC-121

Mr. Barry D. Stephens, P.E.

Sr. Vice President Engineering

Energy Absorption Systems

3617 Cincinnati Avenue

Rocklin, CA 95765

Dear Mr. Stephens:

This letter is in response to your request for the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to 

review a roadside safety system for eligibility for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway 

program. 

Name of System: 3-bay QuadGuard® M10 (QG M10) Narrow & Wide

Type of System: Redirective Crash Cushion

Test Level: AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) Test 

Level 2 (TL-2)

Testing conducted by: E-Tech Testing Services, Inc.

Task Force 13 Designators: SCI30: QG M10 Narrow

SCI31: QG M10 Wide

Date of request: March 3, 2011

Date of completed package: June 15, 2012

Decision

The following device is eligible, with details provided in the form which is attached as an 

integral part of this letter:

• TL-2 3-bay QuadGuard® M10 (QG M10) Narrow & Wide

Based on a review of crash test results submitted by the manufacturer certifying the device 

described herein meets the crash test and evaluation criteria of the American Association of State 

Highway and Transportation Officials’ Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH), the 

device is eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program. Eligibility for 

reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program does not establish approval or 

endorsement by the FHWA for any particular purpose or use.

The FHWA, the Department of Transportation, and the United States Government do not 

endorse products or services and the issuance of a reimbursement eligibility letter is not an 

endorsement of any product or service.
2

Requirements

To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding, roadside safety devices should meet the crash test 

and evaluation criteria contained in the American Association of State Highway and 

Transportation Officials’ Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). 

Description

The QG M10 Narrow and QG M10 Wide TL-2 systems are redirective, non-gating 3-bay crash 

cushions. The nose cartridge is not counted as a separate bay. The MASH design has been 

revised from the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 design 

to include:

a. reinforced lower front bracket

b. new upper front bracket

c. new cartridge types

The QG M10 3-bay system has an overall length of 13 feet (3.96 meters) and can be configured 

with backup widths of 24 inches [610 millimeters), 30 inches (762 millimeters), and 36 inches 

(914 millimeters) for QG M10 Narrow systems, and 69 inches (1753 millimeters) and 90 inches 

(2285 millimeters) for QG M10 Wide systems. The overall height is 32 inches (817 

millimeters). The system consists of energy absorbing cartridges surrounded by a framework of 

steel Quad-BeamTM guardrail panels that telescope rearward during head-on impacts. The 

system has a backup structure that will resist movement during head-on impacts and a center 

monorail that will resist lateral movement during side impacts when anchored to an asphalt or 

concrete base as per manufacturer specifications.

Components from the TL-3 version of the QG II unit that are used on the new TL-2 3-bay QG 

M10 unit are:

• QG foundation-anchored center Monorail

• QG Fender Panels

• QG Diaphragms

• QG Backup

• MP-3®TM Concrete Anchors

• 14ga steel wrap-around sheet metal Nose

• 2 inch [50 mm] Lower Nose Cartridge Bracket

• 10ga steel rail guide Shims

Components that were modified or added to the TL-2 QG M10 to achieve the required 

performance include: 

• QG Type M-I cartridges (3 required)

• QG Type M-II cartridges (1 required)

• A hold down bracket was added to the nose cartridge to contain the cartridge and maximize 

its energy absorption.

• The bottom nose cartridge bracket attached to the diaphragm was reinforced to help restrain 

the cartridge to maximize its energy absorption.

Design details of the 3-bay QG M10 systems, both narrow and wide are included as an enclosure 

to this correspondence.
3

Findings

Full-scale physical crash testing was conducted according to the MASH. The following tables list 

all required crash tests per MASH for Test Level 2 Systems:

Narrow Systems 24 inches (610 millimeters), 30 inches (762 millimeters),

and 36 inches (914 millimeters)

Illustration Test # Completed Notes

2-30 NO Test 2-32 was passed with a 3-Bay 2286 mm [90 

inches] Wide System. This test was completed as 

worst case for the 1100C and thus Test 2-30 can be 

waived for the Narrow Systems.

2-31 YES 3-Bay 610 mm [24 inches] Narrow System was 

tested. 

- Impact speed = 70.6 km/h

- Ridedown = -15.1 g’s

- Longitudinal ΔV = 9.0 m/s

Passed all ORV’s. In addition and as per AASHTO 

MASH Section G, an analysis was subsequently 

conducted on Test 2-31 data. The analysis results has 

determined MASH Test 2-38 (i.e., 1500A mid-sized 

vehicle) is required.

2-32 NO Test 2-32 was passed with a 3-Bay 2286 mm [90 

inches] Wide System. This test was completed as 

worst case for the 1100C and thus Test 2-32 can be 

waived for the Narrow Systems.

2-33 NO Test 2-31 was passed with a 3-Bay 610 mm [24 

inches] Narrow System, tested system capacity for the 

2270P and is considered worst case and thus Test 2-

33 can be waived for the Narrow Systems.

2-34 NO

Test 3-34 was passed with a 6-Bay 610 mm [24 

inches] Narrow System during the QG M10 TL-3 test 

program. Test 3-34 is more severe than Test 2-34 and 

thus Test 2-34 can be waived for the Narrow Systems.

2-35 NO Test 3-35 was passed with a 6-Bay 610 mm [24 

inches] Narrow System during the QG M10 TL-3 test 

program. Due to the lateral stiffness of the 

QuadGuard M10, this test is the same as Test 2-36 

and thus can be waived for the Narrow Systems.

2-36 NO Test 3-36 was passed on 6-Bay 610 mm [24 inches] 

System during the QG M10 TL-3 test program. Test 

3-36 is more severe than Test 2-36 and thus Test 2-36 

can be waived for Narrow Systems.

2-37

NO

Test 3-37 was passed on 6-Bay 610 mm [24 inches] 

System during the QG M10 TL-3 test program. Test 

3-37 is more severe than Test 2-37 and thus Test 2-37 

can be waived.

2-38 YES 3-Bay 610 mm [24 inches] Narrow System was tested.

- Impact speed = 68.3 km/h

- Ridedown = -15.9 g’s

- Longitudinal ΔV = 8.6 m/s
4

Passed all ORV’s for Test 2-38

Wide Systems 69 inches (1753 millimeters) and 90 inches (2285 millimeters)

Illustration Test # Completed Notes

2-30 NO Test 2-32 was passed with a 3-Bay 2286 mm 

[90 inches] Wide System. This test was 

completed as worst case for the 1100C and thus 

Test 2-30 can be waived for the Wide Systems.

2-31 NO Test 2-31 was passed with a 3-Bay 610 mm [24 

inches] Narrow System, tested system capacity 

for the 2270P and is considered worst case and 

thus Test 2-31 can be waived for the Wide 

Systems.

2-32 YES 3-Bay 2286 mm (90 inches) Wide System was 

tested.

- Impact speed = 70.3 km/h

- Ridedown = -13.5 g’s

- Longitudinal ΔV = 9.9 m/s

Passed all ORV’s.

2-33 NO Test 2-31 was passed with a 3-Bay 610 mm [24 

inches] Narrow System, tested system capacity 

for the 2270P, and is considered worst case and 

thus Test 2-33 can be waived for the Wide 

Systems.

2-34 NO Test 3-34 was passed with a 3-Bay 610 mm [24 

inches] Narrow System during the QG M10 

TL-3 test program. Test 3-34 is more severe 

than Test 2-34 on a Wide System and thus Test 

2-34 can be waived for the Wide Systems

2-35 NO Test 3-35 was passed with a 3-Bay 610 mm [24 

inches] Narrow System during the QG M10 

TL-3 test program. Test 3-35 is more severe 

than Test 2-35 on a Wide System and thus Test 

2-35 can be waived for the Wide Systems

2-36 NO Test 3-36 was passed on 6-Bay 2286 mm [90 

inches] Wide System during the QG M10 TL-3 

test program. Test 3-36 is more severe than 

Test 2-36 on a Wide System and thus Test 2-36 

can be waived for Wide Systems.

2-37 NO Test 3-37 was passed on 6-Bay 610 mm [24 

inches] System during the QG M10 TL-3 test 

program. Test 3-37 is more severe than Test 2-

37 on a Narrow System and thus Test 2-37 can 

be waived for Wide Systems

2-38 NO Test 2-38 was passed with a 3-Bay 610 mm [24 

inches] Narrow System and is considered no 

different for a Wide System and thus Test 2-38 

can be waived for the Wide Systems
5

Since the shorter 3-Bay wide system has a side that is at a steeper angle (10 degrees) than that of the 6-Bay 

wide system (5 degrees), this 3- Bay wide system installation specification must indicate the traffic-side 

panels as parallel as possible to the edge of the road or travel way, but no more than 5 degrees off parallel.

One-page test summaries for each of the conducted crash tests are included as enclosures to this 

correspondence. In addition, NCHRP Report 350 crash test summary sheets as also included for 5-

bay QG II (wide) and original QG (narrow) systems.

Manufacturer requests previous successfully conducted MASH TL-3 tests 3-34, 3-35, 3-36, and 

3-37 be accepted in lieu of proposed MASH TL-2, tests 2-34, 2-35, 2-36, and 2-37 because the 

redirective ability of the QGM10 is not reduced due to its length due to most of anchor loading 

occurred in the immediate initial impact area and was not transmitted to adjacent diaphragms.

Summary and Standard Provisions

Therefore, the system described and detailed within this correspondence is eligible for 

reimbursement and may be installed under the range of conditions tested.

Please note the following standard provisions that apply to FHWA eligibility letters:

• This letter provides a AASHTO/ARTBA/AGC Task Force 13 designator that should be 

used for the purpose of the creation of a new and/or the update of existing Task Force 13 

drawing for posting on the on-line ‘Guide to Standardized Highway Barrier Hardware’ 

currently referenced in AASHTO Roadside Design Guide.

• This finding of eligibility does not cover other structural features of the systems, nor 

conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

• Any changes that may influence system conformance with MASH will require a new 

reimbursement eligibility letter.

• Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service 

performance reveals safety problems, or that the system is significantly different from the 

version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to modify or revoke this letter.

• You are expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and 

installation requirements to ensure proper performance.

• You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the same 

chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for review, and that it 

will meet the test and evaluation criteria of the MASH.

• To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of eligibility is designated as number

CC-121 and shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test documentation 

upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and documentation may be 

reviewed at our office upon request. 
6

• This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, 

manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder. 

The FHWA does not become involved in issues concerning patent law. Patent issues, if 

any, are to be resolved by the applicant.

Sincerely yours, 

Michael S. Griffith 

Director, Office of Safety Technologies

Office of Safety

Enclosures
7