alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 30 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00672
- CR
ANDREW CLARENCE DAVI S, III, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F13
- 12582
- S



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine wheth er appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
tri al court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure e ffective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
         BALANCE SHEETS AND INCOME STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
         BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Oct-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                         891
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               891
<PP&E>                                         21,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                 421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,378
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23,237
<SALES>                                        2,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,391
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (177)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (177)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (177)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.18)


</TABLE>
#### William J. SINGLETON, Petitioner, v. BELL BAKERIES, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 40279.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 17, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
June	16,	2014

Mr.	Chris	Frantz

US	EPA

109	T.W.	Alexander	Drive

Mail	Code:	#143

- 05 Research	Triangle	Park,	NC		27709 (submitted	via oilandgas.whitepapers@epa.gov )

RE: Letter	of	Su pport	for	API’s	c omments	on	the	EPA White	Papers	on

Me thane	and	VOC Emissions	in the	Oil	and	Natural	Gas	Sector

Dear	Mr.	Franz:

America’s	Natural	Gas	Alliance	(ANGA)	appreciates	the	opportunity	to	provide	input on	the	Environmental	Protection	Agency’s	(EPA)	White	Papers on	Methane	and Volatile	Organic	Compound	(VOC)	Emissions	in	the	Oil	and	Natural	Gas	Sector.

Representing	North	America’s	leading	independent	natural	gas	exploration	and production companies,	America's	Natural	Gas	Alliance	(ANGA)	works	with	industry,

gover nment	and	customer stakeholders	to	promote	increased	demand	for ,	and availability	of, our	nation’s	abundant	natural	gas resource	for	a	cleaner	and	more secure	energy	future. The	collective	natural	gas	production	of	the	ANGA	member companies	is	approximatel y	eight	trillion	cubic	feet	per	year,	which	represents	one third	of	the	total	annual	U.S.	natural	gas	supply.

On	April	15,	2014,	EPA	released	for	external	peer	review	five	technical	white papers on	potentially	significant	sources	of	emissions	in	the	oil and	gas	sector

. As	noted	in the	Obama	Administration’s	Strategy	to	Reduce	Methane	Emissions,	EPA	will	use the	papers,	along	with	the	input	received	from	peer	reviewers	and	the	public,	to determine	how	best	to	pursue	additional	reduct ions	from	these	sourc es. Regulations	stemming	from	these	white	papers	have	the	potential	to	significantly impact	our	members,	and	ANGA	writes	to support	the	comments	submitted	by	the American	Petroleum	Institute	(API)	on	the	five	white	paper	topics	covered.

ANGA	provided	ex tensive	feedback	throughout	the	development	of	the	New	Source Performance	Standard	(NSPS)	Subpart	OOOO	rule,	where	each	source	addressed	by the	white	papers	was	considered	for	regulation	by	EPA,	who	ultimately decided not to	regulate	them.		While	oil	and	g as	production	continues	to	evolve,	the	fundamental merits	of	requiring	additional	regulatory	control	of	these	sources	is	unchanged; therefore,	we	believe	that	no	additional	regulation	of	oil	and	gas	production	sourcesis	necessary	prior	to	the	full	impleme ntation	of	the	NSPS	OOOO	rule	and	a subsequent	evaluation	of	emissions.

ANGA believe s that	the	current	white	papers	are	insufficient	to	inform	sound	policy

decisions. As	such,	we	support	API’s	recommendations	to	revise	the	white	papers	to

correct	fu ndam ental	flaws	or	inaccuracies; develop	a	response	to	comments document	that	identifies	the	changes	that	EPA	makes	to	the	revised	white	papers

and explains	the	Agenc y’s	rationale	for	those	changes; and	identify	current	and upcoming	emissions	studies	to	better inform	EPA’s	understanding	of	these	source

emissions	and	await	the	results.

ANGA	appreciates	EPA’s	work	to	initiate	these	white	papers	and	the	opportunity	to provide	input. If	you	have	any	questions,	please	don’t	hesitate	to	contact	me	at ebowman@anga.us or	202

- 789

- 2642.

Sincerely,

Erica	Bowman Vice	President,	Research	and	Policy	Analysis
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
SRA International, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stanton D. Sloane, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 15, 2007



/S/    STANTON D. SLOANEStanton D. Sloane President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83)

Universal Transverse Mercator, zone 13N

9"

! ! ! !

! ! ! !

!

!

!

!

! !

!

! !

!

!

! !

! !

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

! ! !

! !

! ! !

!

!

! !

!

! ! !

! !

! ! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

! !

!

!

!

! ! !

!

!

!

! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! !

! ! ! ! !

! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! !

! ! ! ! !

! ! !

!

!

! ! !

! ! ! !

! ! !

! ! ! !

!

!

! !

! !

!

!

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

OP42

IJ089

B

IJ088

B

IJ088

B

IJ088

B

IJ086

B

IJ082

B

IJ010

C

IJ008

C

IJ005

C

IJ006

C

IJ002 IJ C 001

C

IJ003

C

IJ079

B

IJ080

B

IJ031

B

IJ019

A

OP55

OP55

OP55

IJ028

B

OP247

./54

./54

OP42

Torrance Co

Socorro Co Lincoln Co Socorro Co Lincoln Co

Socorro Co

Torrance Co

458BA

129

99C1

161

161

99

99

104

Lincoln Co

Torrance Co

99C

Text

Cedarvale

RED CLOUD

458N

5

458X

167E

16

7

H

458BA

104A

458N5

458B

144

99O

458B1

458P

458B3

131F

10

4

142M3

161

99

458S1

458N2

142W

133CA

167F

102

133D

131BA

458C

131D

129

533

458A

458M

458

142

167I

131

458

161L

458N6

458P1

4

5

8

S

458B2

458MA

133C

142X

167G

133

142M

Corona

Round

Top

Lackey

Point

Rough

Mountain

Gallinas

Peak

North

Peak

Gallinas

Mountains

Pine

Hill

West

Turkey

Cone

Cougar

Mountain

105°30'0"W

105°30'0"W

105°37'30"W

105°37'30"W

105°45'0"W

105°45'0"W

105°52'30"W

105°52'30"W

106°0'0"W

106°0'0"W

106°7'30"W

106°7'30"W

34°30'0"N

34°30'0"N

34°22'30"N

34°22'30"N

34°15'0"N

34°15'0"N

34°7'30"N

34°7'30"N

400000

400000

410000

410000

420000

420000

430000

430000

440000

440000

450000

450000

3770000 3770000

3780000 3780000

3790000 3790000

3800000 3800000

3810000 3810000

3820000 3820000

Gallinas Division

Route Number Route Designation Length in Miles

99C 0.03

99C1 0.10

Routes Too Short to Be Seen Clearly on the Map

Road Open to All Vehicles

Map 2 of 2

Route

Number

Distance / Side

of Road

Vehicle Type Dates Allowed

Beginning

Mile Post

End Mile

Post

99 13.41 14.55

104 2.66 3.72

104 5.5 6

104A 0 0.26

133 0 0.08

133C

133CA 0.17 0.5

133D 0 0.02

142W 0.13 2.07

144 0 2.63

161 4.58 9.74

1.83 2.52

3.64 4.63

Dispersed Camping

Entire route

458

300' either side

Same as

permitted on

road

Same as permitted

on road
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
               BROADBAND TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 401(K) PLAN

          WHEREAS, BroadBand Technologies, Inc. (the "Sponsor") adopted the
BroadBand Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the "Plan"), as most recently amended
and restated effective July 1, 1997; and

          WHEREAS, the Sponsor desires to amend the Plan;

          NOW, THEREFORE, the Sponsor amends the Plan as follows effective as of
the date hereof:

     1. Section 6.11 of the Plan is amended and restated by adding the following
paragraph to the end of the Section:

     Notwithstanding the foregoing, for each Participant who transfers
     employment to Bosch Telecom, Inc. ("Bosch") under the agreement between the
     Employer and Bosch dated May 18, 1998 (an "Affected Participant"), the
     Affected Participant's vested interest in his or her Profit-Sharing and
     Matching Contributions Sub-Accounts shall become 100 percent (if not
     already 100%) effective June 7, 1998.

     2. The first paragraph of Section 12.1 of the Plan is amended and restated
to read as follows:

     A Participant who is a party in interest may make written application to
     the Administrator for a loan from his Separate Account, other than that
     portion of his Separate Account attributable to Employer Contributions;
     provided, however, that a Participant who is an Affected Participant (as
     defined in Section 6.11) may apply for a loan hereunder regardless of
     whether he is a party in interest so long as he or she is an employee of
     Bosch Telecom, Inc.

     3. Section 12.6(f) of the Plan is amended and restated to read as follows:

     (f)  Effect of Termination of Employment: Upon a Participant's termination
          of employment, the balance of any outstanding loan hereunder shall
          immediately become due and owing; provided, however, that, the
          provisions of this subsection (f) shall not apply to any loan to an
          Affected Participant (as defined in Section 6.11) until such time as
          the Affected Participant terminates employment with Bosch Telecom,
          Inc.

<PAGE>


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Sponsor has executed this instrument this ____
day of June, 1998.


                          BROADBAND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                       By:
                                       --------------------------
                                       Title:
                                       --------------------------
#### Robert M. TROMBLEY, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, an agency of the State of Florida, and W. Wesley Wallace, Respondents.

No. 77-1740.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 28, 1978.

David T. Price of Price & Bryne, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Howard Hadley and Louis B. Guttmann, III, Winter Park, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

DOWNEY, DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATIA
TERMINALS GROUP N.V.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1000

       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS       
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999 
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1999 
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1999 
<CASH>                                           20,474 
<SECURITIES>                                          0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    11,292 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        784 
<INVENTORY>                                       1,449 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 34,076 
<PP&E>                                          231,747 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22,545 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  249,602 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            32,809 
<BONDS>                                         135,000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            40,000 
<PREFERRED>                                      53,350 
<COMMON>                                              4 
<OTHER-SE>                                      (11,561)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    249,602 
<SALES>                                          20,787 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 37,415 
<CGS>                                            17,946 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    28,600 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4,482 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4,202 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     320 
<INCOME-TAX>                                        254 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,655)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0 
<CHANGES>                                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,655)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0 
        


</TABLE>
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
#### AUTOMATIC CARBONIC CORPORATION, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Harvey R. MORRIS, et al., Respondents.

No. 39720.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 23, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 234 So.2d 700.

ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3249 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3249

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the outpatient clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
    in Wyandotte County, Kansas City, Kansas, as the ``Captain Elwin 
                         Shopteese VA Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CAPTAIN ELWIN SHOPTEESE VA CLINIC.
    (a) Designation.--The outpatient clinic of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs located at 9201 Parallel Parkway, Kansas City, Kansas, 
shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 
designated as the ``Captain Elwin Shopteese Department of Veterans 
Affairs Clinic'' or the ``Captain Elwin Shopteese VA Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the outpatient 
clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the Captain Elwin Shopteese VA Clinic.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on Form  S-8  (No.  333-63863,  No.  333-38300,  No.  33-66624,  No.
33-85420,  and No. 333-00404) of Sodexho Marriott  Services,  Inc. of our report
dated October 11, 2000 relating to the  financial  statements,  which appears in
the Annual Report to Shareholders,  which is  incorporated in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the  incorporation  by reference of our report
dated  October 11, 2000  relating to the financial  statement  schedules,  which
appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Washington, D.C.
November 9, 2000
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 11, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41604 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RENE ROLANDO ESTRADA-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-556-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rene Rolando Estrada-Ramirez (Estrada) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after a previous deportation. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). The Government seeks enforcement of the waiver provision in Estrada’s plea agreement. We need not decide the applicability of the waiver in this case because this issue isNo. 04-41604 -2- foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Estrada contends that AlmendarezTorres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. GarzaLopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Estrada properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of ProxyMed, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Gregory J. Eisenhauer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ GREGORY J. EISENHAUER, CFA

Gregory J. Eisenhauer, CFA
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ProxyMed,
Inc. and will be retained by ProxyMed, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-09-0054

SAT Date: 11/21/2008

Print Date: 3/21/2011

Related cases: CBI: Yes

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: Analogs: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 U1

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal, inhalation

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

P2Rec Comments:

Comment: SAT had no comment

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG OVERLOAD; ONCO; IMMUNOTOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-09-0054-57

FATE: 

Solid

S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 EC (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 EC (E)

BP > 400 EC (E)
H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = U

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = U

Sorption to soils/sediments = U

PBT Potential: PUBU

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = U

 Health:

 Health Summary: Expect poor absorption via all routes (pchem/analog). 

Concern for lung toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for poorly soluble particulates. Also 

concern for oncogenicity and immunotoxicity based on carbon nanomaterials.

 Ecotox:

Test 

Organism

Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid chronic value *

algal _ chronic value *

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for polynonionic polymers; SAR 

chemical class = polymer-nonionic-carbon; pH7; effective concentrations based on 

100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and 

TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer