Page 1 of 45

WISCONSIN 

2022 ANNUAL REPORT 

Disclaimer: This report is the property of the State Department of Transportation (State DOT). The State DOT 

completes the report by entering applicable information into the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Highway 

Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) online reporting tool. Once the State DOT completes the report pertaining to its 

State, it coordinates with its respective FHWA Division Office to ensure the report meets all legislative and regulatory 

requirements. FHWA’s Headquarters Office of Safety then downloads the State’s finalized report and posts it to the 

website (https://highways.dot.gov/safety/hsip/reporting) as required by law (23 U.S.C. 148(h)(3)(A)). 
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 2 of 45

Table of Contents

Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................. 3

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence ............................................................. 3

Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Structure ................................................................................................................................. 5

Program Administration ..................................................................................................................... 5

Program Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 7

Project Implementation .......................................................................................................................14

Funds Programmed .........................................................................................................................14

General Listing of Projects ..............................................................................................................16

Safety Performance ............................................................................................................................25

General Highway Safety Trends ......................................................................................................25

Safety Performance Targets ............................................................................................................31

Applicability of Special Rules ...........................................................................................................33

Evaluation ...........................................................................................................................................34

Program Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................34

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements .......................................................35

Project Effectiveness .......................................................................................................................40

Compliance Assessment.....................................................................................................................41

Optional Attachments ..........................................................................................................................44

Glossary ..............................................................................................................................................45
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 3 of 45

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence 

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or 

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action 

for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, 

schedules, lists, or other data.”

23 U.S.C. 407 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data 

compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential 

accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, 

and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement project 

which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted 

into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for 

damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, 

schedules, lists, or data.”
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 4 of 45

Executive Summary

The following report outlines the details of projects obligated in state fiscal year 2022 for Wisconsin's Highway 

Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). Details of the report include: 

• Program Structure 

o projects are identified by state DOT staff on the state-owned system and by local government 

staff on the local system. All candidate projects must compile crash data and develop a 

proposed treatment strategy as part of a competitive application process. 

• Project Implementation 

o WisDOT manages the HSIP on a state fiscal year (SFY) basis. There were 71 projects with 

HSIP funds obligated to them in SFY 2022 totaling $44,851,799.15 in federal funds. 

• Safety Performance 

o Wisconsin has seen an increase in crashes across all five federal safety performance measure 

areas: fatalities, fatality rate, serious injuries, serious injury rate, and number of non-motorized 

fatalities and serious injuries. 

o WisDOT continues to establish aspirational safety targets in an effort to increase safety on all 

public roads. 

• Evaluation 

o Program effectiveness is evaluated using benefit/cost ratio and crash data analysis. Previous 

HSIP projects and countermeasures are evaluated to help identify any programmatic changes 

needed.

• Compliance Assessment 

o The current Strategic Highway Safety Plan is undergoing an update and should be completed 

before the next reporting cycle. All aspects of federal data reporting and collecting requirements 

are being monitored for compliance.
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 5 of 45

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of achieving 

a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 

924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP implementation 

and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the HSIP Reporting Guidance dated 

December 29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, progress in implementing highway safety 

improvement projects, progress in achieving safety outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the 

improvements and compliance assessment. 

Program Structure

Program Administration 

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of achieving 

a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. Projects are identified by statewide 

screenings and DOT regional safety engineers on the state-owned system and by local government staff on 

the local system. All candidate projects must compile crash data and develop a proposed treatment strategy as 

part of a competitive application process. The applications are considered through a peer review process that 

involves statewide and regional safety engineering staff, as well as HSIP program management staff. 

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Other-Programming

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

• Central Office via Statewide Competitive Application Process 

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP. 

HSIP applications from local and tribal governments are solicited by the WisDOT Regions as part of the regular 

HSIP Program. All HSIP applications derived from local governments are selected and submitted voluntarily by 

local governments. Projects on the local system or sponsored by local or tribal governments must meet the 

same requirements and follow the same process as HSIP applications submitted by WisDOT Regions for 

improvements on the State Trunk Network. 

In addition, Wisconsin has continued the High Risk Rural Roads Program (HRRRP) despite its formal 

elimination in MAP-21. Wisconsin has developed a statewide data analysis methodology which identifies 

county rural roads with run-off-road non-intersection crash issues. Counties with such corridors are offered a 

field review of the corridor, at no cost, that identifies potential treatments and are invited to apply for HSIP 

funding to implement some or all of the identified treatment options. A primary goal of the program is to install 

low-cost safety treatments on these roadways to reduce fatal and serious injury crashes as quickly as possible. 

Evaluating and addressing safety concerns at a corridor level on these roadways enables more cost-effective 

investments in safety treatments that might otherwise not compete well for federal safety funding. 
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 6 of 45

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) 

Bureaus, Divisions) are involved with HSIP planning. 

• Design 

• Districts/Regions 

• Operations 

• Planning 

• Traffic Engineering/Safety 

• Other-Division of State Patrol 

• Other-Division of Motor Vehicles 

Describe coordination with internal partners. 

The HSIP Program is managed by WisDOT's Division of Transportation Investment Management (DTIM) and 

the Bureau of State of Highway Programs (BSHP). DTIM/BSHP makes all final application approvals or denials 

and reviews/approves project change orders or cost increase requests. However, DTIM/BSHP coordinates its 

efforts with several internal partners that both directly and indirectly influence the decision-making process. 

Below is a summary of these partners and their role in the program. 

- Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV): DMV receives, edits, and maintains all law enforcement crash report files. 

- Traffic Safety Council (TSC): The TSC is comprised of representatives from Division of Transportation 

System Development (DTSD), DTIM, DMV, Division of State Patrol (DSP), and various Executive Offices 

within WisDOT. Among this group's responsibilities is developing and maintaining the Wisconsin Strategic 

Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), which helps guide the safety efforts of the HSIP Program. 

- Traffic Safety Engineering Workgroup (TSEWG): TSEWG is comprised of the State HSIP Manager, State 

Traffic Safety Engineer, and the Regional Traffic Safety Engineers. In some cases, the Regional HSIP 

Coordinators also participate. This group identifies and evaluates potential safety initiatives both within and 

outside of the HSIP Program, provides peer support, and reviews proposed HSIP projects. After a group 

evaluation, a recommendation to approve or not approve is forwarded to the State HSIP Manager for final 

review. 

- State Project Oversight Engineers: The State Project Oversight Engineers are a critical component of the joint 

process with the TSEWG for application review and approval. The DTSD State Project Oversight Engineers, 

Regional Traffic Safety Engineers, the State Traffic Safety Engineer, and the State HSIP Coordinator provide a 

recommendation of approval or disapproval of HSIP funding after a comprehensive peer review facilitated by 

the State HSIP Manager. Each Region has one Project Oversight Engineer. State Project Oversight Engineers 

only review applications originating from the Region in which they are assigned. This consensus approval or 

disapproval is advisory to the DTIM/BSHP. 

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning.

• Academia/University 

• FHWA 

• Local Government Agency 

• Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs) 

Describe coordination with external partners. 

The HSIP is fully coordinated and integrated with the work of other organizations, associations, and 

stakeholders (e.g., law enforcement, academia, local governments, Metropolitan Planning Organizations) that 
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 7 of 45

play a role in reducing fatalities and serious injuries. One of the basic foundations of the HSIP is the direct 

linkage between the data-driven priorities established in the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and the 

identification, development and implementation of HSIP projects. Local and regional governments alike 

contribute towards achieving the goals and objectives of the SHSP. More specifically, WisDOT encourages 

local jurisdictions to develop and implement HSIP projects that address priority safety issues on locally owned 

roadways . These projects are typically completed through the state let process, but can be implemented by 

local forces in limited situations. 

Program Methodology 

Does the State have an HSIP manual or similar that clearly describes HSIP planning, 

implementation and evaluation processes? 

Yes 

The WisDOT HSIP manual is updated annually. The 2022 update was not finalized at the time of this reporting. 

An updated version of the manual can be made available once finalized. 

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP.

• Horizontal Curve 

• HRRR

• Intersection 

• Median Barrier 

Program: Horizontal Curve

Date of Program Methodology:7/11/2022

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes • Volume

• Lane miles • Horizontal curvature

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

• Other-benefit cost ratio

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 8 of 45

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Competitive application process

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:2

Available funding:1

Program: HRRR

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2018

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• Other-Run off road • Functional classification

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Crash rate

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 9 of 45

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Program: Intersection

Date of Program Methodology:7/11/2022

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes • Traffic

• Volume

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

• Level of service of safety (LOSS)

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Competitive application process

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 10 of 45

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:1

Available funding:2

Program: Median Barrier

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2021

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

• FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes

• Other-All CMC • Other-Centerline miles • Functional classification

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Other-Non-competitive application process

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 11 of 45

Available funding:1

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements? 

 3

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic 

improvements? 

• Cable Median Barriers 

• Other-High Risk Rural Roads 

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

• Crash data analysis 

• Data-driven safety analysis tools (HSM, CMF Clearinghouse, SafetyAnalyst, usRAP) 

• Engineering Study 

• Road Safety Assessment 

• Other-County Traffic Safety Commission recommendations 

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

No

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts? 

Yes 

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts. 

HSIP Project Prioritization

Wisconsin evaluates potential HSIP projects by comparing the estimated crash reduction benefits expected 

from the project and the cost of that project. Crash reduction benefits are estimated by multiplying up to two 

crash modification factors (CMF) by 5-years of observed crash data. CMFs and target crashes are identified by 

the safety analyst and a spreadsheet tool is used to calculate the estimated crash reduction benefits. The 

spreadsheet tool incorporates the WisDOT CMF Table and logic described in our statewide policy described at 

the link below. 

http://wisconsindot.gov/dtsdManuals/traffic-ops/manuals-and-standards/teops/12-03.pdf 

HSIP Safety Effectiveness Evaluations

Wisconsin evaluates the effectiveness of all HSIP projects that were prioritized based on crash history. The 

Empirical-Bayes Before/After Safety Evaluation method, described in chapter 9 of the Highway Safety Manual, 

is used for these safety effectiveness evaluations. No evaluations are completed for systemic safety projects 

within our HSIP. 

Describe program methodology practices that have changed since the last reporting 

period.

Wisconsin's HSIP continues to utilize the Intersection Network Screening tool that utilizes safety performance 

functions (SPFs). 
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 12 of 45

SPFs are equations that predict crash frequency and severity as a function of traffic volume and roadway 

characteristics. WisDOT developed network screening level SPFs for multiple intersection types using 

Wisconsin specific data. The SPFs are used to determine performance measures. Level of Service of Safety 

(LOSS) with Empirical Bayes (EB) adjustment was selected to set the performance threshold for when to flag 

intersections as Sites of Promise. Potential for Safety Improvement (PSI), also called Excess Expected 

Average Crash Frequency with EB Adjustment was selected to provide context on how the intersection is 

performing compared to similar sites. These performance measures were selected based on their ability to 

account for: 

· regression to the mean (RTM) bias 

· changes in traffic volume 

· the nonlinear relationship between crash frequency and traffic volume 

The intersection network screening tool is used to identify potential locations for HSIP applications. One 

screening change since the last reporting period was to establish a separate eligibility criteria for urban versus 

rural locations. This change will allow a better opportunity for funding by comparing locations with similar 

characteristics. Once those locations are identified via the tool, the standard HSIP application process is 

followed. 

Describe other aspects of the HSIP methodology on which the State would like to 

elaborate.

A key component in the development of the HSIP is the Project Evaluation Factor (PEF). The PEF is a 

measurement that is used to evaluate and compare proposed projects. It provides a comparison of the 

estimated crash reduction potential of a proposed improvement with the overall cost of the project. Although it 

has similarities to a benefit/cost analysis, it does not include all of the elements of a traditional benefit/cost 

analysis tool for ranking the relative merits of a group of projects, and should not be compared to a benefit/cost 

analysis.

An Excel-based program is used to perform a safety project analysis and computes the PEF. The following 

provides a general overview of several key elements of the PEF: 

• All costs associated with the project (design, utilities, real estate, construction, etc.) must be included in the 

PEF calculation, regardless of whether HSIP funds are requested for all elements of the project. Cost 

estimates must be in current year dollars. 

• The analysis requires crash data from the most recent 5-year period for which crash information is available. 

Ideally, the analysis would include crash data from the most recent calendar year. For example, an analysis 

submitted in 2020 would include crash information from the 2015-2019 period. However, given that: (a) it can 

take several months after the end of a calendar year for the Department to finalize crash information and 

integrate the crash information into departmental datasets; and (b) it can take several months for a safety 

proposal to be developed and scoped, the use of an additional, older year of crash data is allowed. For 

example, an analysis submitted in calendar year 2020 may use crash data from either the 2015-2019 period or 

the 2014-2018 period. 

For local projects, it is the responsibility of the project sponsor to compile and provide the required crash data 

to the regional office for the PEF evaluation. WisDOT facilitates this process by providing funding to the 

University of Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory (UW TOPS Lab) to make this data available 

to local governments. 
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 13 of 45

• Although Wisconsin designs solutions to reduce all crashes, a number of targeted engineering, educational 

and enforcement efforts have been implemented with the defined goal of reducing crashes involving serious 

injuries and fatalities. Because of this focus on reducing serious injuries and fatalities, the PEF scoring 

mechanism assigns higher values to these crash types. 

• The current values used within the PEF tool to calculate the potential crash reduction benefits of a safety 

improvement are influenced by the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) developed by the American Association of 

State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 

• Standardized crash reduction factors are included in the Excel tool for a wide range of safety improvements. 

These factors are based on national safety research and are regularly updated as new research becomes 

available. 

• Projects generally require a PEF of 1.0 or greater for approval. However, the HSIP Review Committee 

acknowledges the PEF contains many variables and that sometimes additional expense is needed to 

sufficiently address a safety issue. As such, the HSIP Review Committee may consider applications with a 

PEF greater than or equal to 0.9 for approval. Projects with a PEF less than 0.9 will not be approved. 

• Projects treating locations identified on the annual "Locations of Interest Report" (LOIR) and Intersection 

Network Screening list may be approved with a PEF of 0.50 or greater. LOIR and Intersection Network 

Screening locations with a PEF less than 0.5 will not be approved. 

• The PEF requirement is generally waived for projects identified through a statewide safety analysis. The PEF 

requirement is currently waived for: 

o High Risk Rural Roads Program projects 

o Crossover Median Crash Initiative projects 

o Beam Guard Initiative projects 

o Shoulder Rumble Strip Initiative 

o Horizontal Curve Initiative
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 14 of 45

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed 

Reporting period for HSIP funding.

State Fiscal Year

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category. 

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % 

OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $44,851,799 $44,851,799 100%

HRRR Special Rule (23 

U.S.C. 148(g)(1))

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

154)

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

164)

$0 $0 0%

RHCP (for HSIP 

purposes) (23 U.S.C. 

130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds 

(i.e. STBG, NHPP)

$0 $0 0%

State and Local Funds $6,097,590 $6,097,590 100%

Totals $50,949,389 $50,949,389 100%

Actual programmed amount is a dynamic value due to project change order requests, schedule changes, etc. 

WisDOT monitors the HSIP to ensure an adequate amount of funds are programmed each fiscal year. 

For SFY 2022, there were $3,940,458.44 in state funds and $2,157,131.52 in local funds obligated to the 

program. 

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal 

safety projects? 

$10,333,245

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects? 

$10,333,245

There were a total of 34 local projects for SFY 2022. 

Federal share obligated = $10,333,244.71 

Local share obligated = $1,929,000.16 
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 15 of 45

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$90,000

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$90,000

There was one non-infrastructure project in SFY 2022.

Federal share = $90,000

State share = $10,000

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas 

during the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$0

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during 

the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$17,000,000

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in 

the future.

Project delays can make it challenging to fully utilize HSIP funding. Such delays occur for a variety of reasons, 

including changes in project scope during the design process (which triggers a required re-evaluation of the 

project), changes in associated projects that are linked to the HSIP project, and unforeseen issues arising 

during the project development process. WisDOT continues to work on developing a list of projects that could 

be advanced from later program years into earlier program years to ensure that HSIP funding is fully utilized 

even if projects are delayed or fall out of the program.
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 16 of 45

General Listing of Projects 

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period. 

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

1000-99-78 Miscellaneous Data collection 0 Miles $90000 $100000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

N/A N/A 0 HRRRP 

support ID

HRRRP 

Support

Data

1020-00-14 Roadside Barrier – cable 1.51 Miles $74160 $82400 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

1020-02-15 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal timing –

left-turn phasing

0.043 Miles $46443 $51603 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

1050-00-10 Roadside Barrier – cable 4.39 Miles $76941 $85490 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

1058-23-02 Access 

management

Change in 

access - close or 

restrict existing 

access

0.084 Miles $392135 $435706 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther9,090 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

1190-01-16 Roadside Barrier – cable 1.32 Miles $27810 $30900 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

1198-00-09 Roadway Pavement 

surface – high 

friction surface

0.16 Miles $57600 $64000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

1400-01-70 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

12.171 Miles $149739 $166376 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,377 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

1400-01-73 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

10.271 Miles $323487 $359430 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,168 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

1410-01-71 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control –

Modern 

Roundabout

0.39 Miles $1277010 $1418900 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther8,256 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

1440-40-71 Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

0.089 Miles $743906 $826562 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

1480-29-71 Intersection 

geometry

Innovative 

Intersection (e.g. 

MUT, RCUT, QR)

0.73 Miles $1386900 $1541000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 17 of 45

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

1530-00-11 Alignment Vertical 

alignment or 

elevation change

0.05 Miles $67500 $75000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

1550-04-82 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

7.002 Miles $248814 $276460 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther5,254 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

1570-05-63 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

8.3 Miles $354695 $394105 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther7,509 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

1706-01-73 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

9.69 Miles $212447 $236052 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther5,001 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

2050-12-00 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.029 Miles $83430 $92700 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

2160-05-71 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.008 Miles $389648 $432942 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

2305-02-00 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.023 Miles $27810 $30900 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

2330-08-70 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

3.889 Miles $119478 $132754 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

2355-08-00 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.008 Miles $62637 $69597 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

2565-09-70 Intersection 

geometry

Intersection 

geometry - other

0.054 Miles $322763 $358626 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

2707-09-00 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.054 Miles $337031 $374479 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

2740-02-00 Intersection 

geometry

Intersection 

geometry - other

0.011 Miles $97823 $108692 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther16,140 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 18 of 45

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

2814-03-00 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control –

Modern 

Roundabout

0.027 Miles $215846 $239829 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

2816-03-00 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control –

Modern 

Roundabout

0.024 Miles $216569 $240632 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

2967-00-77 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.117 Miles $880740 $978600 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

2984-13-95 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

backplates with 

retroreflective 

borders

0 Miles $336897 $374330 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Local Road or 

Street

0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

2984-13-96 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

backplates with 

retroreflective 

borders

0 Miles $293845 $326495 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Local Road or 

Street

0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

2984-21-01 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal timing –

left-turn phasing

0.009 Miles $207000 $230000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

2984-21-02 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal timing –

left-turn phasing

0.031 Miles $234000 $260000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

2984-21-03 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal timing –

left-turn phasing

0.015 Miles $209250 $232500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

2995-04-74 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.005 Miles $1022792 $1136436 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

2995-05-77 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.07 Miles $329006 $365562 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

3120-01-61 Roadway Pavement 

surface – high 

friction surface

9.61 Miles $208566 $231739 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,965 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 19 of 45

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3576-01-64 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

9.745 Miles $357980 $397756 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,011 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

3588-00-30 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

5.75 Miles $54600 $60667 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

3755-03-70 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

5.757 Miles $208325 $231473 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

3996-00-09 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.31 Miles $180559 $200621 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

3996-00-11 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.17 Miles $67562 $75069 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

4060-05-72 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control –

Modern 

Roundabout

0.571 Miles $1530000 $1700000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,338 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

4075-39-72 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

4.94 Miles $73800 $82000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

4125-14-60 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

11.695 Miles $457306 $508118 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

4236-02-71 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

7.229 Miles $109754 $121949 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

4580-10-71 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

3.667 Miles $139788 $155320 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

4677-10-00 Access 

management

Change in 

access - close or 

restrict existing 

access

0.101 Miles $94332 $104813 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

4822-07-01 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

8.953 Miles $41400 $46000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

5010-06-72 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

9.741 Miles $576695 $640772 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,590 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 20 of 45

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

5120-02-70 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.157 Miles $284837 $316486 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther13,160 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

5235-03-71 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

1.479 Miles $66067 $73408 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,000 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

5310-00-70 Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

0.138 Miles $186462 $207180 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther12,180 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

5400-00-72 Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

0.128 Miles $585792 $650880 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther36,803 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

5400-00-72 Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

0.128 Miles $1530000 $1700000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther36,803 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

5845-01-78 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control –

Modern 

Roundabout

0.359 Miles $176150 $195722 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther11,142 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

5845-01-78 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control –

Modern 

Roundabout

0.359 Miles $1530000 $1700000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther11,142 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

5849-02-05 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.271 Miles $774065 $860072 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

5880-00-66 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

7.858 Miles $284136 $315707 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,546 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

5880-00-67 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

5.626 Miles $326017 $362241 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,520 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

5897-00-60 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

11.358 Miles $485584 $539538 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,730 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

5990-01-28 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

backplates with 

retroreflective 

borders

0 Miles $443175 $492417 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

5990-01-30 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

backplates with 

0 Miles $275368 $305964 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 City or 

Municipal 

Spot Intersections
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 21 of 45

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

retroreflective 

borders

Highway 

Agency

5990-01-33 Roadway Roadway 

narrowing (road 

diet, roadway 

reconfiguration)

1.33 Miles $182754 $203060 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

5990-01-35 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.285 Miles $195162 $216847 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

5992-07-06 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.101 Miles $108366 $120407 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

5992-07-18 Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

0.102 Miles $67500 $75000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

6020-00-70 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control –

Modern 

Roundabout

0.616 Miles $734284 $815872 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,640 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

6020-00-70 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control –

Modern 

Roundabout

0.616 Miles $2081779 $2313088 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,640 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

6040-00-65 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

7.614 Miles $374303 $415892 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,432 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

6085-02-07 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.275 Miles $93497 $103886 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

6240-22-71 Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder –

paved or other 

(includes add 

shoulder)

10.871 Miles $395053 $438948 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

6290-09-70 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.495 Miles $2349610 $2610678 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

32,063 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

6290-09-71 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.159 Miles $805412 $894902 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther18,753 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 22 of 45

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

6380-00-62 Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

8.444 Miles $1317751 $1464168 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther6,654 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

6560-08-71 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control –

Modern 

Roundabout

0.493 Miles $1530000 $1700000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

6570-09-71 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

13.591 Miles $255157 $283508 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

6610-04-70 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control –

Modern 

Roundabout

0.319 Miles $1266568 $1407298 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 6,413 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

7027-00-01 Alignment Horizontal curve 

realignment

0.203 Miles $74160 $82400 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

7028-00-73 Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

0.057 Miles $488624 $542916 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

7076-01-02 Alignment Horizontal curve 

realignment

0.149 Miles $85769 $95299 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

7080-03-75 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

9.667 Miles $401131 $445701 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,754 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

7110-00-70 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

15.177 Miles $622035 $691150 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,889 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

7220-00-78 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

6.273 Miles $272993 $303326 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,832 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

7373-00-70 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

1.79 Miles $191549 $212832 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

7570-05-64 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

8.071 Miles $267847 $297608 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,394 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

7575-07-70 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic 

signal – add 

additional signal 

heads

0.083 Miles $432911 $481012 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 13,160 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 23 of 45

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

7575-07-73 Roadway Roadway 

narrowing (road 

diet, roadway 

reconfiguration)

0.887 Miles $1620000 $1800000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther10,926 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

7600-01-75 Roadway Roadway 

narrowing (road 

diet, roadway 

reconfiguration)

1.025 Miles $1448505 $1609450 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

7849-03-04 Alignment Vertical 

alignment or 

elevation change

0.012 Miles $101970 $113300 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

7896-02-70 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

7.627 Miles $359276 $399195 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

8072-00-71 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

9.962 Miles $405675 $450750 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,792 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

8110-01-76 Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

0.177 Miles $455684 $506316 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther8,253 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

8160-00-09 Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

0.004 Miles $83430 $92700 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

8590-00-01 Alignment Horizontal curve 

realignment

0.797 Miles $168714 $187460 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

8939-03-08 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

6.933 Miles $60630 $67367 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

8944-04-01 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control –

Modern 

Roundabout

0.058 Miles $114021 $126690 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections

8949-00-07 Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

0.015 Miles $96408 $107120 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

8949-00-71 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control –

two-way stop to 

all-way stop

8.628 Miles $277273 $308081 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,785 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

9080-14-72 Intersection 

geometry

Add/modify 

auxiliary lanes

2.212 Miles $257480 $286089 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 10,016 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 24 of 45

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

9170-12-71 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

10.154 Miles $375680 $417422 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

9180-25-71 Roadway Rumble strips –

edge or shoulder

3.498 Miles $176325 $195917 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

9660-01-04 Intersection 

geometry

Intersection 

geometry - other

0.144 Miles $129364 $143738 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 600 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 25 of 45

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends 

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five 

years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Fatalities 543 506 566 607 613 588 566 614 615

Serious Injuries 3,309 2,986 2,999 3,039 3,271 3,005 2,938 3,030 3,292

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

0.910 0.840 0.910 0.950 0.940 0.890 0.850 1.070 1.030

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

5.560 4.970 4.830 4.760 5.010 4.560 4.430 5.260 5.520

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

48 49 73 63 65 60 70 62 58

Number of nonmotorized serious 

injuries

303 288 292 303 314 307 298 280 343
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 26 of 45

Annual Fatalities

 

Annual Serious Injuries

 
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 27 of 45

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

 

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

 
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 28 of 45

Describe fatality data source. 

State Motor Vehicle Crash Database

FARS data was not available for use before the HSIP annual report deadline. State fatality numbers were used 

as a baseline to estimate final FARS numbers. Historically, FARS numbers have been higher than the state 

fatality numbers. The average difference between FARS and state numbers was calculated using 2016-2020 

data. 

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and 

ownership. 

Year 2021

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Interstate

31.75 134.75 0.54 9.32

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

27.25 111.25 2.27 4.86

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other

77.5 311 1.21 7.68

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

 
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 29 of 45

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Minor Arterial 83.5 364.5 1.77 6.2

Rural Minor Collector 24.75 133.25 1.15 5.45

Rural Major Collector 92.5 422.75 1.19 9.66

Rural Local Road or 

Street

64.25 388.25 1.61 1.5

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

17 118.25 0.22 1.02

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

6.75 33.5 0.21 5.68

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other

68 509.75 0.76 4.07

Urban Minor Arterial 28 228 0.5 8.67

Urban Minor Collector

Urban Major Collector

Urban Local Road or 

Street

28 328.75 1.04 11.95

City Street Urban

City Street Rural

Town Road Rural

County Trunk Urban

County Trunk Rural

State Highway Urban

State Highway Rural

Interstate Highway 

Urban

Interstate Highway 

Rural

Urban Collector 33.75 237.25 1.22 2.29
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 45

Year 2021

Roadways Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

State Highway 

Agency

289.2 1,358.4 0.79 3.7

County Highway 

Agency

125.8 647.2 1.04 5.33

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City or Municipal 

Highway Agency

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency 146 1,101.6 0.97 7.25

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority

Local Toll Authority

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, 

University)

Indian Tribe Nation

Wisconsin does not currently have each crash directly associated to the roadway functional classification. 

Several data sources and methodologies were used to combine crash data from 2017-2021 to roadway 

functional classification. As such, there may be some discrepancies in actual crash data and functional 

classification. 

Not all 2021 crashes have been mapped at the time of this reporting so preliminary data was used. 

Additionally, the VMT for 2021 was not final at the time of this reporting, so a preliminary VMT was used.

Data sources used for this effort do not currently split Urban Collector into "Minor" and "Major", so only a 

general Urban Collector total was provided.
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 31 of 45

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets

Calendar Year 2023 Targets *

Number of Fatalities:587.2

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Number of fatalities target is calculated as a 2% reduction from the most recent 5-year rolling average, which is 

the performance measure goal identified in the SHSP.

FARS data was not available at the time of HSP target submittal. Since several HSP targets and HSIP targets 

must match exactly, all the HSIP targets were established at the same time as the HSP targets. State data was 

used to calculate the 2023 target for number of fatalities. The historical difference between state fatality data 

and FARS data was also factored in and accounted for.

Number of Serious Injuries:3044.3

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Number of serious injuries target is calculated as a 2% reduction from the most recent 5-year rolling average, 

which is the performance measure goal identified in the SHSP.

Fatality Rate:0.937

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) target is calculated as a 2% reduction from the most recent 5-year rolling average, 

which is the performance measure goal identified in the SHSP.

FARS data was not available at the time of HSP target submittal. Since several HSP targets and HSIP targets 

must match exactly, all the HSIP targets were established at the same time as the HSP targets. State data was 

used to calculate the 2023 target for number of fatalities. The historical difference between state fatality data 

and FARS data was also factored in and accounted for.

Serious Injury Rate:4.857

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) target is calculated as a 2% reduction from the most recent 5-year rolling 

average, which is the performance measure goal identified in the SHSP.

Total Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries:364.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Total number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries target is calculated as a 2% reduction from the 

most recent 5-year rolling average, which is the performance measure goal identified in the SHSP.
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 32 of 45

FARS data was not available at the time of HSP target submittal. Since several HSP targets and HSIP targets 

must match exactly, all the HSIP targets were established at the same time as the HSP targets. State data was 

used to calculate the 2023 target for number of fatalities. The historical difference between state fatality data 

and FARS data was also factored in and accounted for.

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish 

safety performance targets. 

The HSIP is fully coordinated and integrated with the work of other organizations, associations, and 

stakeholders (e.g., law enforcement, academia, local governments, MPOs) that play a role in reducing fatalities 

and serious injuries. One of the basic foundations of the HSIP is the direct linkage between the data-driven

priorities established in the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and the identification, development and 

implementation of HSIP projects. Local and regional governments alike which contribute towards achieving the 

goals and objectives of the SHSP help guide program decisions and project selections. More specifically, 

where there are a high percentage of crashes that occur off the State system, WisDOT works with local 

jurisdictions to help them develop and implement HSIP projects that address priority safety issues on locallyowned roadways. This is either done by locals doing work as local forced accounts or they are let by WisDOT. 

Stakeholders will continue to contribute to and support the goals established in the SHSP. This in turn 

encourages safety projects that meet established safety performance targets.

WisDOT coordinates with the MPOs in the establishment of the state’s annual federal safety targets reported in 

the HSIP. WisDOT shares Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) level crash data with the MPOs for their analysis. 

MPOs establish safety targets by developing their own MPA targets or by agreeing to support WisDOT’s state 

targets. The approved MPO federal safety targets are reported to WisDOT.

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

Describe progress toward meeting the State’s 2022 Safety Performance Targets (based 

on data available at the time of reporting). For each target, include a discussion of any 

reasons for differences in the actual outcomes and targets.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES TARGETS ACTUALS

Number of Fatalities 576.0 599.2

Number of Serious Injuries 2897.9 3107.2

Fatality Rate 0.890 0.956

Serious Injury Rate 4.482 4.956

Non-Motorized Fatalities and 

Serious Injuries

350.2 371.4

Targets for all five performance measure categories are not anticipated to be met based on available data at 

the time of this reporting.

Wisconsin did see a decrease trend in all performance measure areas except one (non-motorized fatalities and 

serious injuries) for the period of 2017-2019. Numbers increased across all performance measure areas in 

2020 and continued the increasing trend in 2021. Traffic and crash impacts from the Covid-19 pandemic likely 

contributed to the increase in numbers in 2020 and 2021. This trend was seen nationally as well.
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 33 of 45

Wisconsin will continue to set aspirational safety targets and adjust its HSIP accordingly, in an effort to 

increase safety on all public roads.

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

No

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries 65 

years of age and older for the past seven years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Fatalities

99 91 92 96 102 80 99

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Serious 

Injuries

198 227 249 262 290 258 311
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 34 of 45

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness 

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP? 

• Benefit/Cost Ratio 

• Change in fatalities and serious injuries 

While a simple change in fatal and serious injury crashes is an overall indicator of the effectiveness of the 

safety culture in the state, there are many other factors outside the scope of normal HSIP projects that 

influences. For this reason, we rely on a "before and after" Empirical Bayes Analysis of HSIP projects to 

determine their performance. 

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of 

the State's program level evaluations. 

WisDOT has contracted with the University of Wisconsin - Traffic Operations and Safety (UW-TOPS) 

Laboratory to complete project evaluations. Wisconsin HSIP projects implemented between 2013 and 2019 

were evaluated. The evaluation process consisted of data collection, safety effectiveness, economic 

assessment, reporting, and development of program specific CMFs. The safety effectiveness and economic 

assessment was conducted using the Empirical Bayes (EB) method at the site specific or project level. 

There was an overall positive safety and economic effect of projects implemented with 43 out of 64 projects 

showing B/C ratios greater than one. The 64 HSIP projects evaluated in Wisconsin provided a B/C ratio of 2.71 

for a horizon of 10 years. Alternatively, using the observed data during the study period of each project 

(between three to five years after implementation), the current return on investment was estimated. Current 

overall crash cost benefit is equal to $72 million which corresponds to a B/C ratio of 1.10. Therefore, the 

benefit of the 64 HSIP projects have already surpassed the cost of the projects at three to five years of the 

projects’ life cycle.

Using the Wisconsin CODES data, hospital and crash databases were linked to categorize injuries by part of 

the body, fracture involvement, and threat to life. Using the estimated number of persons injured per crash by 

severity, HSIP projects are estimated to have prevented a total of 536 crashes which translates to seven lives 

saved, 379 person injuries prevented (29 A, 134 B, and 217 C), and 1,067 persons loss of property avoided 

(no injuries). 

Roadway facilities where similar treatments were implemented were selected to develop Wisconsin specific 

CMFs. Treatments such as roundabouts, J-turns, and cable barrier/guardrail showed similar results as the 

literature with significant potential for reduction in crashes, especially for fatal and injury crashes. 

The complete evaluation report completed by UW-TOPS is available upon request. 
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 35 of 45

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and 

success of the Highway Safety Improvement Program? 

• # miles improved by HSIP 

• HSIP Obligations 

• Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process 

• Increased focus on local road safety 

• Policy change 

Describe significant program changes that have occurred since the last reporting 

period.

Since the last reporting period, WisDOT has worked to improve its HSIP by implementing the following 

program changes and/or initiatives: 

State System : 

· Implementation of the Intersection Network Screening Spreadsheet using Level of Service of Safety and 

Potential for Safety Improvement criteria for urban and rural locations. 

· Updated cross-median crash analysis 

· Developed a horizontal curve initiative policy to address run off the road crashes 

· Developed a shoulder rumble strip initiative policy to address run off the road crashes 

Local System : 

· Increase local participation in HSIP 

o Easy to access public website 

o Standard project solicitation notification message 

o Program presentations at appropriate local conferences, meetings, etc 

· Local system focused pilot program 

· Continuation of High Risk Rural Roads program 

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements 

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures. 

Year 2021

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Roadway Departure 306.4 1,523.4 0.49 2.43
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 36 of 45

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Intersections 156.8 1,052.4 0.25 1.68

Pedestrians 51.6 232.6 0.08 0.37

Bicyclists 9.2 75.8 0.02 0.12

Older Drivers 0 0 0 0

Motorcyclists 92.6 554.8 0.15 0.89

Work Zones 11.6 68.6 0.02 0.11

Reduce Speed Related 

Crashes

168.6 943.6 0.27 1.51

Reduce Alcohol/DrugImpaired Driving184.4 787.8 0.29 1.26

Reduce Cross Median 

Crashes

83.4 312.4 0.14 0.5

Improve Safe Travel in 

Bad Weather

99.8 543.6 0.16 0.86

Improve Driver 

Alertness/Reduce Driver 

Distraction

48.8 416.2 0.08 0.66

Improve Occupant 

Protection

153.6 456.6 0.25 0.73
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 37 of 45

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 38 of 45

Has the State completed any countermeasure effectiveness evaluations during the 

reporting period?

Yes

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 39 of 45

Please provide the following summary information for each countermeasure 

effectiveness evaluation. 

CounterMeasures: all 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: All 

Number of Installations: 64 

Number of Installations: 64 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 5 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using empirical Bayes or Full 

Bayes 

Results: 

64 HSIP projects between 2013 and 2019 

were evaluated. B/C rations greater than 

one were observed in 43 of the 64 

projects. A full breakdown of treatment 

types and results can be found in the 

attached report. 

File Name: WisDOT_HSIP_Report_08-12-2021.pdf
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 40 of 45

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 41 of 45

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative?

 11/07/2017

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP? 

From: 2017 To: 2020

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update?

 2021

Updates to the current SHSP have been delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Updates are anticipated to be completed in 2022. 

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

*Based on Functional Classification (MIRE 1.0 Element Number) [MIRE 2.0 Element Number]

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY SEGMENT Segment Identifier 

(12) [12]

100 100 100 100 100 100

Route Number (8) 

[8]

100 100

Route/Street Name 

(9) [9]

100 100

Federal Aid/Route 

Type (21) [21]

100 100

Rural/Urban 

Designation (20) [20]

100 100 100 100

Surface Type (23) 

[24]

100 100 100 60

Begin Point 

Segment Descriptor 

(10) [10]

100 100 100 100 100 100

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11) [11]

100 100 100 100 100 100

Segment Length 

(13) [13]

100 100

Direction of 

Inventory (18) [18]

100 100
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 42 of 45

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Functional Class 

(19) [19]

100 100 100 100 100 100

Median Type (54) 

[55]

100 75

Access Control (22) 

[23]

100 100

One/Two Way 

Operations (91) [93]

100 100

Number of Through 

Lanes (31) [32]

100 100 100 100

Average Annual 

Daily Traffic (79) [81]

100 65 100 1

AADT Year (80) [82] 100 65

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4) [4]

100 95 100 95 100 95

INTERSECTION Unique Junction 

Identifier (120) [110]

95

Location Identifier 

for Road 1 Crossing 

Point (122) [112]

95

Location Identifier 

for Road 2 Crossing 

Point (123) [113]

95

Intersection/Junction 

Geometry (126) 

[116]

90

Intersection/Junction 

Traffic Control (131) 

[131]

85

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road 

(79) [81]

95

AADT Year (80) [82] 95

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139) [129]

95

INTERCHANGE/RAMP Unique Interchange 

Identifier (178) [168]

100 100
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 43 of 45

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (197) [187]

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201) [191]

100 100

Ramp Length (187) 

[177]

100 100

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195) [185]

100 100

Roadway Type at 

End Ramp Terminal 

(199) [189]

100 100

Interchange Type 

(182) [172]

Ramp AADT (191) 

[181]

100 100

Year of Ramp AADT 

(192) [182]

100 100

Functional Class 

(19) [19]

100 100

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4) [4]

100 95

Totals (Average Percent Complete): 100.00 94.44 93.13 0.00 90.91 90.45 100.00 84.00 100.00 99.00

*Based on Functional Classification (MIRE 1.0 Element Number) [MIRE 2.0 Element Number]

Some percentages were lowered from previous reporting periods as a result of more refined data. Wisconsin is still on track to meet all requirements for this effort. 

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026. 

Wisconsin already collects most of the MIRE FDEs. Based on current data collection efforts and targets, Wisconsin is on track to meet the September 30, 2026 deadline. The Division of Transportation System Development, Bureau of 

Traffic Operations will be starting a project to update the intersection inventory which contains intersections on the state system. Part of this project could include adding MIRE FDE elements and attributes. The framework used for the 

state system could then be evaluated for use on the local system.
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 44 of 45

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

04-01-10e.pdf

Project Implementation:

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

WisDOT_HSIP_Report_08-12-2021.pdf

Compliance Assessment:
2022 Wisconsin Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 45 of 45

Glossary

5 year rolling average: means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data 

(e.g. annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area: means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process.

Highway safety improvement project: means strategies, activities and projects on a public road 

that are consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous 

road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem.

HMVMT: means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects: are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule: applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which 

data are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013.

Performance measure: means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to 

monitor changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and 

objectives.

Programmed funds: mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification: means the process by which streets and highways are 

grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP): means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on 

safety data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148.

Systematic: refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across 

a system.

Systemic safety improvement: means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high 

risk roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types.

Transfer: means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.