alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          27,126
<SECURITIES>                                    22,630
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                       536
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,400
<PP&E>                                           3,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                     887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,170
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,602
<SALES>                                          4,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,114
<CGS>                                              814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      814
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   202
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,018)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,018)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,018)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
#### In re In the Interest of K. J., and R. J., Children. Mrs. J. O. WILLIAMSON, Appellant, v. The DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, State of Florida, and Ralph P. Jackson, Appellees.

No. 72-925.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 31, 1973.

*12Boylston, Johnson, Harnden & Webb, Sarasota, for appellant.

Larry K. Coleman, of Knowles & Blalock, Bradenton, and Chester G. Senf, Jacksonville, for appellee The Division of Family Services, State of Fla.

MANN, Chief Judge.

We treat this interlocutory appeal, brought by a witness, not a party, but whose motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum was denied, as a petition for certio-rari.

The trial court heard testimony that the support of two children of appellant’s son was dependent upon a trust fund established by the appellant, which she testified to as of substantial value. She declined to bring records or furnish any basis for the court’s evaluation of her testimony that the trust corpus was subject to her withdrawing her requirements, whatever they may be.

The trial judge entered an order requiring the production of the trust instrument and records pertaining to the trust. In addition, he entered an ordqr appropriately protecting the appellant against disclosure of the evidence so produced.

We think no case has been made out for our issuance of certiorari in this situation.

Appeal dismissed as not allowed under the Florida Appellate Rules. Treating the appeal papers as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.

LILES and HOBSON, JJ„ concur.
#### Ex parte Alfonzo Eugene MANNING.

77-423.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 28, 1978.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marimba, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as
filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew Chmyz, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company for the periods presented in the Report.



|              
|--------------
|April 29, 2003
|              



* A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Marimba, Inc. and will be retained by Marimba, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     BALANCE SHEETS AND INCOME STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
     BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Oct-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                         891
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               891
<PP&E>                                         21,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (421)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,378
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23,237
<SALES>                                        2,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,391
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (177)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (177)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (177)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .13
        


</TABLE>
#### Curtis Lee WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-892.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 1973.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard C. Booth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

*32PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Curtis Lee Williams, a/k/a Curtis Bundle, was charged with robbery, tried and convicted. Appellant was sentenced to the state penitentiary for the term of his natural life. During the trial proceeding appellant was represented by private counsel.

Appellant’s appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence was affirmed by this court in Williams v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 259 So.2d 795. After the foregoing-proceeding for relief had terminated adversely against appellant, he filed in the trial court a motion to vacate conviction and sentence pursuant to RCrP 3.850, 33 F.S.A. On September 25, 1972, the trial court entered an order denying appellant’s motion for relief.

Subsequently, on October 25, 1972, notice of appeal was filed to this court to review the trial court’s order. Appellant’s counsel, an assistant public defender, requested to be relieved as attorney for appellant under the rationale of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493. The record shows that the assistant public defender, on March 13, 1973, served a copy of this brief on appellant by certified mail. Further, the record discloses that the clerk of this court, on March 26, 1973, entered an order advising appellant that in 30 days, if he so desired, he could file a brief with this court submitting any matter that he deemed advisable in connection with this appeal. To date we have not received a brief or response from appellant.

In his Anders brief, the assistant public defender requested that this court review appellant’s brief, pro se, filed in the trial court pursuant to his motion to vacate his conviction and sentence.

We have very carefully examined the eight points raised by appellant in his brief filed pro se before the trial court seeking to vacate and set aside his judgment and sentence. We have likewise, with equal diligence, examined the entire record and briefs in the case previously before this court. Williams v. State, *supra.*

We have concluded that each of the points raised by appellant is without merit for the reason that the said points were raised on appellant’s direct appeal, or that he had sufficient and ample opportunity to raise them in his direct appeal.

The points not specifically involved in the direct appeal, but under review here, are completely uncorroborated and unsubstantiated and are only based upon appellant’s averments.

Accordingly, we

Affirm.

HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.

MANN, C. J., concurs in conclusion.
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Rouge Resources Ltd. on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: May 30, 2012

ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.

/s/ Ronald McGregor ------------------------------------
Ronald McGregor,Chief Financial Officer and Director

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the report of FIIC Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the
      capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      James W. France


James
      W.
      France


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


June
      ___,
      2006





/s/
      Wade L. Estep


Wade
      L.
      Estep


Chief
      Financial Officer


June
      21,
      2006
NIHSeniorHealth: Transcript "What Do the Kidneys Do?"

file:///C|/Users/mames/Desktop/test/gpo20737/NIHSeniorHealth%20Transcript%20What%20Do%20the%20Kidneys%20Do.htm[1/13/2014 10:06:14 AM]

Transcript: "What Do the Kidneys Do?"

Narrator: A doctor speaks with a patient in his office.

Patient: So what do the kidneys do?

Doctor: Well, you have two kidneys and they're each about the size of your fist and they're located on

each side of your spine. The kidneys are usually described simply as filters but they do a lot more

than that. Their job really is to maintain the composition of the blood at a constant level. They do

filter the blood and they remove waste products and water and they produce urine, which is waste

products and water.

But in addition to that, they have many other functions. They play a major role in controlling blood

pressure, they maintain a major role in preventing you from becoming anemic, and they also have a

very important role in maintaining the strength of your bones.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1313
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus R. TALATI, Inc., A Ohio Corporation; PRAVIN TALATI, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-02-1486-DKC) Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 16, 2004 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Onkar N. Sharma, SHARMA & BHANDARI, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellants. James G. Healy, CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: R. Talati, Inc., a Ohio Corporation, and Pravin Talati appeal the district court’s order confirming an arbitration award in favor of Choice Hotels International, Incorporated. We have reviewed the briefs filed by the parties and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Choice Hotels Int’l v. Talati , No. CA-02-1486-DKC (D. Md. filed Feb. 14, 2003 & entered Feb. 19, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because we have granted Appellants’ uncontested motion to submit the case on the briefs and because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-QSB

[X] Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
    of 1934

For the Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2002

                                       or

[ ] Transitional report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act

                          Commission File No. 000-26635

                                 Daliprint, Inc.
                                 ---------------
                 (Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

         Delaware                                       13-4031362
------------------------------            -------------------------------------
State or other jurisdiction of            I.R.S. Employer Identification Number
incorporation or organization

            317 Madison Avenue, Suite 2310, New York, New York 10017
            --------------------------------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)

Issuer's telephone number:  (212) 949-9696
                            --------------

Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) been
subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days.

Yes     X       No
    ----------     -----------

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common
equity, as of the latest practical date: As of November 12, 2002, there were
2,545,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, outstanding

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):
Yes             No     X
    ----------     -----------


         Daliprint, Inc. files this amendment to its quarterly report on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 to include as an
exhibit the Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Remedent  USA,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Robin List, Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  and Stephen F. Ross, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robin List                                /s/ Stephen F. Ross
----------------------------                  -------------------------------
Robin List                                    Stephen F. Ross
Chief Executive Officer                       Chief Financial Officer
November 18, 2003                             November 18, 2003




                                        1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MTM Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, J.W. Braukman III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

|    |  |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: June 24, 2008 |  | /s/ J.W. Braukman III  
|                   
|                    |  | J.W. Braukman III      
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           8,689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  228,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (13,463)
<INVENTORY>                                    322,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               561,795
<PP&E>                                         290,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                (53,171)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,062,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          198,523
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           599
<OTHER-SE>                                     478,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   479,003
<SALES>                                        267,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               267,790
<CGS>                                          105,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               145,635
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (15,056)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    828
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (487)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                341
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       341
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
Order filed December 2, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00909

- CR

____________ WILLIAM K. GREEN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. 717215



### ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment signed August 22 , 2014. The H a rris County District Clerk has informed this C o urt that the above case was mistakenly assigned to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals and should have been assign ed to the First Court of Appeals

. It is ORDERED that the appeal docketed under this court’s appellate cause
number 14

- 14

- 00909

- CR is transferred to the Court of Appeals for the FirstDistrict of Texas pursuant to Local Rule 1.5 14th Tex. App. (Houston) Loc. R. 1.5.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to transfer all papers filed in this c ase, and certify all Orders made, to the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas.

PER CURIAM