alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Francis J. Alfano, Chief Executive Officer of MTM Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31,
     2004, which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic Report"), fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated: June 29, 2004


                                                   /s/ Francis J. Alfano
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                                     Francis J. Alfano
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: November 4, 2009 Meeting with General Motors (GM)

FROM: Brian Nelson

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472

D ATE: March 15, 2010

______________________________________________________________________________

On November 4, 2009, we met with GM to discu ss air conditioning- and GHG-related topics in the September 28, 2009 Proposed Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy. Topics included a general discussion of credits for reducing refrigerant leakage, credits for improving ai r conditioning system efficiency, and the A/C CO2 Idle Test. In addition, vehicle and engine technologies for reducing GHGs were discussed.

Attendees from GM were: Barbara Kiss Ken Porrett Bill Saindon Fred Sciance Curtis Vincent

Attendees from EPA were: William Charmley Tony Fernandez Ed Nam Brian Nelson

Attendees from NHTSA were: Kevin Green Ryan Harrington Angel Jackson Greg Powell James Tamm Rebecca Yoon
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3328 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3328

To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the 
means-test presumption of abuse under chapter 7, qualifying members of 
  reserve components of the Armed Forces and members of the National 
 Guard who, after September 11, 2001, are called to active duty or to 
     perform a homeland defense activity for not less than 90 days.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2023

 Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Cornyn, Ms. 
  Klobuchar, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Tillis, and Ms. Hirono) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the 
means-test presumption of abuse under chapter 7, qualifying members of 
  reserve components of the Armed Forces and members of the National 
 Guard who, after September 11, 2001, are called to active duty or to 
     perform a homeland defense activity for not less than 90 days.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard and Reservists Debt 
Relief Extension Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVISTS DEBT RELIEF AMENDMENT.

    Section 4(b) of the National Guard and Reservists Debt Relief Act 
of 2008 (Public Law 110-438; 122 Stat. 5000) is amended by striking 
``15-year'' and inserting ``19-year''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10b













	Exhibit 10(b)




	INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT










	The Board of Directors

      Ambac Assurance Corporation:












	We consent to the incorporation by reference
      on the registration statement on Form N-1A of Merrill Lynch Principal Protected
      Trust of our report dated January 23, 2002 on the consolidated financial
      statements of Ambac Assurance Corporation and subsidiaries as of December
      31, 2001 and 2000, and for each of the years in three-year period ended
      December 31, 2001, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. which was filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on March 26, 2002.









	 	KPMG LLP
	
      New York, New York

        February 25, 2003
#### Michael Patrick GLOVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-397.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 10, 1973.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Ronald B. Cosgrove, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgments of the lower court hereby appealed are affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur. .
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 6, 2014 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01753-CV 

TODD PRUETT, Appellant 

V. 

LISA CLAYTON, M.D., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-14518 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

 Appellant has informed the Court he no longer wishes to pursue the appeal and moves to 

dismiss it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; 

43.2(f). 

 

131753F.P05 

 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

TODD PRUETT, Appellant 

No. 05-13-01753-CV V. 

LISA CLAYTON, M.D., Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-14518. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Lang and Evans participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

 We ORDER that appellee Lisa Clayton, M.D. recover her costs, if any, of this appeal 

from appellant Todd Pruett. 

Judgment entered November 6, 2014.
**EXHIBIT31.02**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Principal Financial Officer**

I, Michael L. Pungello,Chief Financial Officer of BlackRock Global Horizons I LP, certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-K of BlackRock Global Horizons I LP;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c) disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

a) all materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| By                       | /s/ MICHAEL L.  PUNGELLO |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
| Michael L.  Pungello     |
| Chief Financial  Officer |
|                     |
| March 30, 2007           |

 

----
Description of Bonus for Executive Vice-President, Treasurer & CFO



Exhibit 10.2 
 
Bonus Arrangement for Executive Vice-President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer

 
Fastenal Company’s Executive Vice-President, Treasurer, and
Chief Financial Officer is paid a bonus under an individual bonus arrangement. Under this arrangement, the bonus for any quarter is calculated based on the amount by which the Company’s consolidated net income for such quarter exceeds a
percentage of such quarter’s consolidated net sales.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WALTER E. MARTIN, SR., )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) Civil Action No. 05-224 Erie

)

STAFF/FOOD SERVICE, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on 

August 9, 2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on January 27, 2006,

recommended that the Defendant’s motion [Doc. # 4] to dismiss be granted. The

parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service

was made on Plaintiff by certified mail at SCI Graterford, where he is incarcerated, and

on the Defendant. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the complaint and

documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following

order is entered:

AND NOW, this 24th Day of February, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s motion [Doc. # 4] to

dismiss is GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED.

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated

January 27, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

 s/ SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN

Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: all parties of record 

U.S. Magistrate Judge Baxter

Case 1:05-cv-00224-SJM-SPB Document 12 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAHRID JOSEF BURGESS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 575 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of May, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
**6-Axis Robot Video Script**

**YouTube Information:**

Title: Virtual Hydraulics Lab Tour – 6-Axis Robot

Description: A brief overview about the numerous ways the robotic arm is utilized to help conduct physical experiments in the MFS.

**Script:**

An automated robotic arm is used to perform tasks such as sculpting channel banks or flattening the riverbed. It can also be utilized to laser scan objects, as well as the channel bed, in order to create three-dimensional river bed/scour bathymetries. Different instruments can also be mounted to the arm, such as a force sensor to measure flow forces on an object.

**508 Caption Description:**

This video starts with the robot arm pointed downward into the test channel of the flume holding a large plastic blade. Sand is piled up along the right side of the test channel, and as the robot arm travels down the channel, it sculpts and flattens the sand at a 45-degree angle to create a channel bank. The video then shifts to the robot arm lowering a laser scanner into water in the flume. A smaller video appears in the lower left corner showing an underwater view of scale dolosse positioned in sand material. A laser beam slowly pans over the objects while the text appears that reads “Underwater Laser Scan of Dolosse in the Channel Test Section.” A computer model of the three-dimensional point cloud data appears on the screen, showing the bathymetry results from the laser scan. The scan reveals the two delosse among the ripples in the sediment material, while text appears that reads “Scanned 3D Point Cloud Data.” The robot arm is then shown lowering a large bundle of delosse and dowel rods into the flowing water in the channel test section. Text appears on the screen that reads “Drag and lift forces measurements on a single ELJ installation for different flow velocities (model scale 1:25).”
## NO. 12

- 14

- 00009

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

WILLIAM ROBERT PARKE R,

APPELLANT

V.

CHARLES R. MITCHELL,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 123R D

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SHELBY COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this pro se appeal. In his motion, Appellant state s

that there are still unresolved issues against other defendants. We interpret this as an assertion

that the judgment he seeks to appeal is not a final judgment and therefore is not appealable. See

Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because Appellant has met the

requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a) (1), the motion is granted, and the

appeal is dismissed

.

Opinion delivered January 31, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEA LS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JANUARY 3 1 , 2014

NO. 12

- 14

- 00009

- CV

WILLIAM ROBERT PARKE R,

Appellant

V.

CHARLES R. MITCHELL,

Appellee

Appeal from the 123rd District Court

of Shelby County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 13

- CV

- 32,350)

THIS CAUSE came on to be hear d on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle , J

.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-37-002]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 9, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 6, 1997, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 2, the following tariff sheet, to become effective 
October 1, 1997:
    2nd Substitute Twenty-Second Revised Sheet No. 2.2
    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's September 29, 1997 order in Docket No. TM98-1-37-001. 
Accordingly, Northwest has reinstated the GRI Adjustment as an MMBtu 
rate.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27339 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
AAM-12-435-E 

June 25, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10573 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0616 

Mr. Ronald Ludema 

President 

Tulip City Air Service, Inc. 

1581 South Washington Avenue 

Holland, MI 49423 

Dear Mr. Ludema: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 30, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Tulip City Air Service, Inc. (Tulip City Air Service), for an exemption from part 

120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would 

allow Tulip City Air Service, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to 

cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Tulip City Air Service. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Tulip City Air Service, Inc., an exemption from 14 CFR 

part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Tulip City Air Service, which is operating under 

separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing 

program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Tulip City Air Service are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Tulip City Air Service part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

James R Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.33



                                FOURTH AMENDMENT
                               OF ESI PENSION PLAN


         This Fourth Amendment of ESI Pension Plan (the "Plan") is adopted by
ITT Educational Services, Inc. (the "Employer").

                                   BACKGROUND

         A.       The Employer originally established the Plan effective June 9,
1998.

         B.       The Plan has been amended by a First, Second, and Third
Amendment.

         C.       The Employer now wishes to amend the Plan further.

                                    AMENDMENT

         1.       Effective December 31, 2002, the definition of "Actuarial
Equivalent" at Section 2.01 is amended to read as follows:

                  "Actuarial Equivalent" means, with respect to a benefit,
         another benefit that has the same actuarially-determined valued. The
         determination of an Actuarial Equivalent will be computed using the
         mortality table as prescribed from time-to-time by the Secretary
         pursuant to Code subclause 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(I), and an interest rate
         equal to an Applicable Percentage for that Plan Year. For purposes of
         distributions with Annuity Starting Dates on or after December 31,
         2002, and, notwithstanding any other Plan provisions to the contrary,
         the applicable mortality table used for purposes of adjusting any
         benefit or limitation under Code subparagraphs 415(b)(2)(B), (C) or (D)
         as set forth in Section 11.02 of the Plan and the applicable mortality
         table used for purposes of satisfying the requirements of Code
         subsection 417(e) as set forth in Section 7.05 of the Plan is the table
         prescribed in Revenue Ruling 2001-62.


                                      -1-
<Page>

         This Fourth Amendment of ESI Pension Plan is executed this 13 day of
December, 2002.


                                  ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.

                                  By:         /s/ Joseph B. Rainier
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         (Signature)

                                              Joseph B. Rainier
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         (Printed)

                                              VP Dir. HR
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         (Title)
ATTEST:

    /s/ Jenny Yonce
---------------------------
(Signature)

    Jenny Yonce
---------------------------
(Printed)

    MGR, Benefits & HRIS
---------------------------
(Title)


                                      -2-
#### Orlando MENDEZ, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Candido RODRIGUEZ et al., Respondents.

No. 39834.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 17, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.