alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3193 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to allow for the use of telehealth 

in substance use disorder treatment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2023 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. WARNER, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. KAINE, Mrs. CAPITO, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mr. KELLY, and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to allow for the 

use of telehealth in substance use disorder treatment, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telehealth Response 

5 for E-prescribing Addiction Therapy Services Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘TREATS Act’’. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3193 IS

1 SEC. 2. TELEHEALTH FOR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER 

2 TREATMENT. 

3 Section 309(e)(2) of the Controlled Substances Act 

4 (21 U.S.C. 829(e)(2)) is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (A)(i)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘at least 1 in-person med7 ical evaluation’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘at 

8 least— 

9 ‘‘(I) 1 in-person medical evalua10 tion’’; and 

11 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(II) for purposes of prescribing 

13 a controlled substance in schedule III, 

14 IV, or V that has been approved by 

15 the Food and Drug Administration 

16 for the treatment of a substance use 

17 disorder, 1 telehealth evaluation of the 

18 patient; or’’; and 

19 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(D) The term ‘telehealth evaluation’ 

21 means a medical evaluation that is conducted in 

22 accordance with applicable Federal and State 

23 laws by a practitioner (other than a phar24 macist) who is at a location remote from the 

25 patient and is communicating with the patient, 

26 or a practitioner who is treating the patient, 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3193 IS

1 using a telecommunications system referred to 

2 in section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act 

3 (42 U.S.C. 1395m(m)) that includes audio-only 

4 or audio and video equipment permitting two5 way, real-time interactive communication be6 tween the distant site practitioner and the pa7 tient, or the practitioner who is treating the pa8 tient.’’. 

Æ 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1585

DAVID P. FARLEY, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

LILLIE MAE BROWN; BOB BISHOP; SITE MANAGER, CREST STREET, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (5:06-cv-00209-F) 

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and 

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

David P. Farley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

David P. Farley appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion filed in a closed case. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Farley v. Brown, No. 

5:06-cv-00209-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SS. 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Technest Holdings, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
do hereby certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/
      Gino M. Pereira
            
            /s/  Nitin
      V. KotakGino
      M. Pereira
              Chief
      Executive Officer
            
            Nitin
      V. Kotak
              Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      May 15, 2009
            
            Date:
      May 15, 2009
No. 00-7088.

#### Wright *v.*Dees, Warden, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2005077EN.01001401.xml

| 23.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 77/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 77/14

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 8 March 2005

concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (Sixth EDF) for the financial year 2003

(2005/256/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Third ACP-EEC Convention, signed at Lomé on 8 December 1984,

Having regard to Internal Agreement 86/126/EEC on the financing and administration of Community aid (1), and in particular Article 29(3) thereof,

Having regard to the Financial Regulation of 11 November 1986 applicable to the Sixth European Development Fund (Sixth EDF) (2), and in particular Articles 66 to 73 thereof,

Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the Sixth EDF as at 31 December 2003 and the Court of Auditors’ Report concerning the financial year 2003 together with the Commission’s replies (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 29(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the Sixth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council, |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 29(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the Sixth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council,

| (2) | The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the Sixth EDF during the financial year 2003 has been satisfactory, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the Sixth EDF during the financial year 2003 has been satisfactory,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the Sixth EDF for the financial year 2003.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2005.

For the Council

The President

J.-C. JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 86, 31.3.1986, p. 210. Agreement as last amended by Decision 86/281/EEC (OJ L 178, 2.7.1986, p. 13).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 325, 20.11.1986, p. 42.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 293, 30.11.2004, p. 315.

3

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-58311, 333-34645, 333-77793, 333-88671,
333-95883, 333-36982, 333-51856, 333-60500 and 333-81128), and in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-113436, 333-04717, 333-34711,
333-50391, 333-92905 and 333-89764), of ProxyMed, Inc. of our report dated March
25, 2004 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
MARCH 16, 2005
#### Edgar Granada CASTILLO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-330.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 28, 1969.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, Phillip A. Hubbart and Robert E. Metzker, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARIC-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Castillo, appeals from a judgment of conviction for the unlawful possession of marijuana.

In his brief he argues three points for reversal but in oral argument only argued the question of whether there was sufficient, competent evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment of conviction.

We have examined the three points for reversal submitted by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See Zalla v. State, Fla.1952, 61 So.2d 649; and Moore v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 475.

The judgment of conviction herein appealed is affirmed.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

January 27, 2012

Mr. Joseph Wesley Dauphinot

Law Office of Wes Dauphinot, P.C.

4025 Woodland Park Blvd., Suite 388

Arlington, TX 76013

Mr. Frederick Wayne 'Fritz' Quast

Taylor Olson Adkins Sralla & Elam LLP

6000 Western Place, Suite 200

Fort Worth, TX 76107-4654

RE:Case Number:  09-0506

Court of Appeals Number:  02-07-00303-CV

Trial Court Number:  352-183879-00

Style:JAYANTI PATEL

v.

CITY OF EVERMAN

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@txcourts.gov or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 09-0506Page 1**
#### Joseph Anthony VECCHIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 76-1116, 76-1157.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 6, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Arthur B. Stark, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Anthony Vecchio appeals his convictions of breaking and entering, two counts of grand larceny and burglary.

Vecehio’s sole point on appeal is that the search warrant issued was invalid on its face for failure to particularly describe the property or things to be seized.

*1170The subject warrant reads in pertinent part:

> “ . . . Stolen property is being possessed in violation of State Statute 812.-031, Receiving Stolen Property. The thing specifically sought to be seized is particularly described as a quantity of stolen auto parts.”

This warrant authorizing the police to search Vecchio’s private residence for stolen auto parts was not tantamount to a license to engage in a general exploratory rummage in Vecchio’s belongings which is prohibited. See *Andresen v. Maryland,*427 U.S. 463, 479, 96 S.Ct. 2737, 2748, 49 L.Ed.2d 627, 642 (1976). We find that describing the generic class of items sought was sufficient. Cf. *North v. State,*159 Fla. 854, 32 So.2d 915 (1947); *James v. U. S.,*416 F.2d 467 (5th Cir. 1969); *U.S. v. Wilson,*451 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1971).

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001076779
<NAME>                        March Indy International, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                     200
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           200
<PP&E>                                     330,400
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             3,302,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      494,750
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   10,840
<OTHER-SE>                                 2,796,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               3,302,028
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              259,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (259,750)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (259,750)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (259,750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.02)




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27340]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-64-002]


Pacific Interstate Offshore Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 9, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 7, 1997, Pacific Interstate Offshore 
Company (PIOC) tendered for filing to be part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet, with 
an effective date of October 1, 1997:

Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 6

    PIOC states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with a 
Commission order dated September 29, 1997 (80 FERC Sec. 62,290) which 
approved PIOC's filing subject to PIOC revising its pagination on the 
tariff sheet as a substitute tariff sheet within 15 days of the 
Commission's order. PIOC states that no other changes have been made to 
the tariff sheet.
    PIOC states that copies of this filing has been served on PIOC's 
sole customer, the Southern California Gas Company and the Public 
Utilities Commission of the State of California and other interested 
parties.
    Any persons desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 and 385.214 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests 
must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27340 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
n/17/20 n 10:28 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS 13001/002 

UNITED ^ DLARMtNTOF 

• ifiANSPORTATIOM 

:OCKL T OPERATIONS 

Jonathan T. Linda _ , _ 

Managing Director. Senior Counsel Regulatory /ijl i p;tjV' i | / \ 11: j 1 

312/997-83-41 

Jonathan, Li nde^un it ed-com 

V U FEDER.-\L EXPRESS 

Hearing Dockci 

FederdI Aviytion Administration 

SOO IndopCndOnco AvcnuC , S W 

Wasliingtoii, DC 20591 

Anention Hearing nockei Clerk AGC-430 

Wilbur Wrij^hl BuilciiniZ - Room 2014 

Kc: FAA Case No. 201OSW270081 f A ^ ^ c<0{i L I 

To ihe Hearing Dookei Clerk: 

Pursuani to ]4 CFR 13.215. Continental Airlines. Inc. ("ContinentiiJ") hereby withdraws \\<. 

request for a hearing in rhc above referenced ca?;c. Sctrlemcnr has been reached with the Federal 

Avi;iiiuTi Adniinistriition ("FAA") on ;in order thul Coniinentiil h«s dp^eed nui lo itppeiil. ;incl ih(.: 

FA.A will noi flic a complaint agalnsc CotuinciiLil in this matter. This serdement does not 

consiiluie or imply t^dmission by Conunenial ihiw w committed the violnuons alleged by the V.W 

in this case or agrees with the facts alleged by the FAA . 

Dared: November 7. 2011 

Re:>pecttully stibmittcd. 

IIKITKD AfR LTNF.S. TKC 

.lotiaihan T. Linde 

Managing Director. Senior Counsel Reguiatorj' 

Rogulaiory. Alliances and Initmational 

United .Air Lines. Inc. 

77 WesiWackerDiive, 16" Floor HDQLD 

Chica^'o. Illinois 60601 

T/F 012)'-)97-S.41 

hmail; Jonathan,linde(3'uniied.com 

Certificate of .Service attached 

Copy to: TmfiDuff. Esq. 

f-"ederal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel, Southwest Region 

2601 Meacham Boulevard 

Fori Worilu Texas 7619.^-0007 

Vii, Federal Express and Facsimile (817) 222oy45/5L>92 

Tnc Uniloo 6uiidriig-HDQLA. 77 WdaiWackaiDjiv^. Chicago. IL 60601 A STA B ALLIANC E rvlEMBE R ^^X 
U/17/201 1 10-28 FAX 2024935142 FAA - D'^^S ©002/00 2 

CBKTIFICATC OF SERVICE 

I hereby ceriify that the attached document was delivered overnight by Federal Express tind sent 

by fac.simile to the fciKowing attorney of recijrd ior the Federal Aviation .-\diiiinisiraiion on 

November?. 201 I: 

Tim Duff. Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

OiT\c& of Regional Counsel, .Southwest Region 

2601 Meacham Boulevard 

Fori Worth, Texas 761Q?-00O7 

Via Fedeml Express and Facsimile (R17) 222-5<?45/5092 

Dated: Novemhcr 7. 2011 

Jonathan T. Linde 

Th6 United Building—HDQLA, 77 West Wackar Drive. Chicago, IL 60601
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Monday, October 27, 1997.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Federal Reserve Bank and Branch director appointments. (This 
item was originally announced for a closed meeting on October 6, 1997.)
    2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: October 17, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-28072 Filed 10-17-97; 4:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MELDRICK TAYLOR,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 423 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 24.1


                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registrations
Statements: Form S-8 No. 33-67076 and Form S-8 No. 33-87630 pertaining to the
BroadBand Technologies, Inc. 1988 Incentive Stock Option Plan; Form S-8 No.
33-67724 pertaining to the BroadBand Technologies, Inc. 1992 Nonqualified Stock
Option Plan; Form S-8 No. 33-73802 pertaining to the Broadband Technologies,
Inc. 401(k) Plan; Form S-3 No. 333-09661 pertaining to the BroadBand
Technologies, Inc. 5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due May 15, 2001 and Form
S-3 No. 333-10443 pertaining to the BroadBand Technologies, Inc. 1,000,000
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants of our
report dated January 31, 1997 with respect to the financial statements of
BroadBand Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1996.




                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                    Ernst & Young LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 26, 1997
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302*
             Date: February 13, 2008By:

/s/
Robin ListName:
    Robin ListTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer 
 *
    
    The introductory portion of paragraph 4 of the Section 302 certification that refers to the
certifying officers responsibility for establishing and maintaining internal control over
financial reporting for the company, as well as paragraph 4(b), have been omitted in
accordance with Release No. 33-8760 (December 15, 2006) because the compliance period has been
extended for small business issuers until the first fiscal year ending on or after December
15, 2007.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOUND ON PAGES 1 AND 2 OF THE COMPANY'S 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MAR-31-1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIREY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,000
<SECURITIES>                                     3,026
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (79)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,169
<PP&E>                                           4,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,567)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,189
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,953
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,942
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,215)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,592
<SALES>                                          4,509
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,131
<CGS>                                               29
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     9
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,618)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,620)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>