alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3278 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify each alien who 

is serving, or has served, in the Armed Forces of the United States 

on the application of any such alien for an immigration benefit or 

the placement of any such alien in an immigration enforcement proceeding, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2023 

Ms. DUCKWORTH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify 

each alien who is serving, or has served, in the Armed 

Forces of the United States on the application of any 

such alien for an immigration benefit or the placement 

of any such alien in an immigration enforcement proceeding, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Immigrant Veterans 

5 Eligibility Tracking System Act’’ or the ‘‘I–VETS Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3278 IS

1 SEC. 2. IDENTIFYING ALIENS CONNECTED TO THE ARMED 

2 FORCES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Upon the application by an alien 

4 for an immigration benefit or the placement of an alien 

5 in an immigration enforcement proceeding, the Secretary 

6 of Homeland Security shall— 

7 (1) determine whether the alien is serving, or 

8 has served, as a member of— 

9 (A) a regular or reserve component of the 

10 Armed Forces of the United States on active 

11 duty; or 

12 (B) a reserve component of the Armed 

13 Forces in an active status; and 

14 (2) with respect to the immigration and natu15 ralization records of the Department of Homeland 

16 Security relating to an alien who is serving, or has 

17 served, as a member of the Armed Forces described 

18 in paragraph (1), annotate such records— 

19 (A) to reflect that membership; and 

20 (B) to afford an opportunity to track the 

21 outcomes for each such alien. 

22 (b) PROHIBITION ON USE OF INFORMATION FOR RE23 MOVAL.—Information gathered under subsection (a) may 

24 not be used for the purpose of removing an alien from 

25 the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Elias ZWICK and Leon Zwick, Appellants, v. Harry J. SONZ, Appellee.

No. 71-101.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 31, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3319 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to address entities that 

are not considered to be investment companies for the purposes of 

that Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2023 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to address 

entities that are not considered to be investment companies for the purposes of that Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding American 

5 Entrepreneurship Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INVESTMENT COMPANIES. 

7 Section 3(c)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 

8 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–3(c)(1)) is amended— 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3319 IS

1 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

2 in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘250 persons’’ and 

3 inserting ‘‘500 persons’’; and 

4 (2) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking 

5 ‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Green Building Corporation 

Under Contract No. FA2816-15-C-0026 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61437 

Mr. Fred Heidarian 

President 

Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. 

Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney 

Lt Col Damund E. Williams, USAF 

Justin D. Haselden, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The parties have reported a settlement and jointly move to dismiss. Accordingly, 

this appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 5 April 2018 

~~IY}'~O~ Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61437, Appeal of Green Building 

Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### Maggie MANZO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL RESERVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Also Known as National Reserve Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 148.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1937.

Powers, Kaplan & Berger, of New York City (David A. Ticktin and Milton Adler, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Charles B. Dullea, of New York City (Alfred B. Nathan, of New York City, Joseph P. Walsh, of St. George, S. I., N. Y., and Benjamin Lewis, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5252-5253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2737]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-32,433; TA-W-32,433D; TA-W-32,433E; TA-W-32,433F; TA-W-32,433G; 
TA-W-32,433H; TA-W-32,433I; TA-W-32,433J; TA-W-32,433K]


Paramount Headwear, Incorporated; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on July 19, 1996, applicable to 
all workers of Paramount Headwear, Incorporated located in Bernie, 
Missouri. The notice was published in the Federal Register on August 6, 
1996 (61 FR 40852). The worker certification was amended August 14, 
1996, to include other locations of the subject firm. The notice

[[Page 5253]]

of the amendment was published in the Federal Register on August 26, 
1996 (61 FR 43781).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The company reports 
worker separations have occurred at other Paramount Headwear production 
facilities at various Missouri locations. Based on this new 
information, the Department is again amending the certification to 
cover Paramount Headwear, Incorporated, located in the following 
Missouri locations: Dixon, Ellington, Lockwood, Marble Hill, Mountain 
Grove, Salem, Van Buren and Winona. The workers were engaged in 
employment related to the production of hats and caps.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Paramount Headwear, Incorporated adversely affected by 
increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-32,433 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Paramount Headwear, Incorporated, Bernie, 
Missouri (TA-W-32,433) and in other cities in Missouri as follows: 
Dixon (TA-W-32,433D), Ellington (TA-W-32,433E), Lockwood (TA-W-
32,433F), Marble Hill (TA-W-32,433G), Mountain Grove (TA-W-32,433H), 
Salem (TA-W-32,433I), Van Buren (TA-W-32,433J) and Winona (TA-W-
32,433K), who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after June 2, 1995, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 21st day of January 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-2737 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27681]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Meeting

    The Aerial Targets, UAVs, and Ranges Symposium in support of the HQ 
USAF Scientific Advisory Board will meet in Las Vegas, NV on November 
12-13, 1997, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to gather information and receive 
briefings on Aerial Targets, UAVs, and Ranges.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and 
(4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory 
Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.
Barbara A. Carmichael,
Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-27681 Filed 10-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-U
# App5
June 2, 2015

United States Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Amendment Request Pursuant To Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012

Dear Sir or Madam:

I am writing to request that the exemption certificate (#11218) written by the FAA for Saratoga Aerial 

Photo and Video, a division of SillyCar Design be amended to allow the PIC to posses a Sport Pilot Certificate 

as opposed to a private pilot certificate as it is currently written.

After speaking with Rob Pappas and referring to the certificate granted to Aeryon Labs (#11213), which 

states “The FAA has reviewed the knowledge and training requirements of sport, recreational, private and 

commercial certificates and concluded that a UAS PIC holding a minimum of a sport pilot certificate, and 

operating under this exemption, would not adversely affect operations in the NAS or present a hazard to persons 

or property on the ground.” and “Because the petitioner did not propose to use certificated pilots, and in light of 

comments received, the FAA re-assessed the level of pilot certificate that would be appropriate for the petitioner’s 

operations. In evaluating this petition, similar to the evaluation of the private and commercial pilot certificates 

in Exemption No. 11062, the agency compared the aeronautical knowledge requirements of the recreational 

and sport pilot certificates to those of the private pilot certificate. We found that the aeronautical knowledge 

requirements that would be applicable to a UAS operation under this exemption for a recreational pilot and 

sport pilot certificate are substantially similar as those for a private pilot certificate.” I believe that Saratoga Aerial 

Photo and Video, a division of SillyCar Design should be a similar candidate for such an amendment.

I am not sure how much information would be required to make this amendment, however, please feel free 

to contact me to discuss any further information that would be helpful in making your decision and I will do my 

best to provide whatever is needed.

In closing, I would like to reiterate that I hope the simple fact that someone such as myself who operates 

a very small business and will be operating a UAS on a very small scale is continuing to strive to comply with 

this exemption shows how serious I am about safety and doing things properly. Thank you very much for your 

time and consideration.

Respectfully submitted,

Joel A. Glastetter

Owner/Operator

Saratoga Aerial Photo and Video

a division of SillyCar Design

1077 Rock City Road
Rock City Falls, NY 12863
258 La. 344

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Charles A. WATTS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51284.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1971.

In re: Charles A. Watts applying for writs of habeas corpus and certiorari.

Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion relator has made a showing requiring an evidenti-ary hearing.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Motorvehicle use map. Inyo National Forest. Bishop & White Mountains, California**
 
2010:Front | Back
2013:Front | Back
2015:Front | Back
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:IN 8/4/BISHOP/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:000911615
 
June 26, 2018
FEATHERRIVERAIRQUALITYMANAGEMENTDISTRICTINRE:;"'"-RESOLUTIONDIRECTINGSTAFFTOSUBMITREGULATIONII,RULE2.0OPENBURNINGTOTHEU.S.EPAASAREVISIONTOTHECALIFORNIASTATEIMPLEMENTATIONPLANRESOLUTIONNO2014-01WHEREAS,theBoardofDirectorsoftheFeatherRiverAirQualityManagementDistrictadoptedrevisionstoRegulationII,Rule2.0OpenBurningafterholdingapublichearingonOctober6,2008;andWHEREAS,atthetimetherevisiontoRegulationII,Rule2.0wasadoptedtheresolutiondidnotdirectDistrictstafftosubmittheRuletotheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)asarevisiontotheCaliforniaStateImplementationPlan(SIP);andWHEREAS,RegulationII,Rule2.0controlsemissionsoffineparticulatematterandassistedtheYubaCity-MarysvilleNonattainmentareawithmeetingthe200624-hourPM2.5nationalambientairqualitystandard,thereforetheRuleshouldbeincludedintheSIP;andWHEREAS,RegulationII,Rule2.0isintendedtoreplacetheburnrulescurrentlyintheSIPfortheYubaandSutterCountyAirPollutionControlDistricts;andWHEREAS,theCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)underSections15308and15061(b)(3)oftheStateCEQAGuidelinesexemptsactionsbyregulatoryagenciesifitcanbeseenwithcertaintythatthereisnopossibilitythattheactionsmayhaveasignificantadverseeffectontheenvironment;andWHEREAS,theFeatherRiverAirQualityManagementDistrictpublishedanoticeofthesubmissionofRegulationII,Rule2.0totheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)onJanuary3,2014,toinvitepubliccommentontheSIPSubmittal;andWHEREAS,theBoardofDirectorsoftheFeatherRiverAirQualityManagementDistrictheldapublichearingandconsideredpubliccommentontheproposedsubmittalonFebruary3,2014;·andWHEREAS,staffoftheFeatherRiverAirQualityManagementDistrict,at1007LiveOakBlvd.SuiteB-3,YubaCity,willmaintaintherecordoftheproceedingsuponwhichthisdecisionisbased.NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDthattheBoardofDirectorsoftheFEATHERRIVERAIRQUALITYMANAGEMENTDISTRICTdirectsstafftoforwardDistrictRegulationII,Rule2.0OpenBurningandallnecessarysupportingdocumentstotheCaliforniaAirResourcesBoardforsubmittaltotheEPAasarevisiontotheSIP;andBEITFURTHERRESOLVEDthatthesubmittalofRegulationII,Rule2.0shallreplacetheburnrulesoftheYubaandSutterCountyAirPollutionControlDistricts;andBEITFURTHERRESOLVEDthatthesubmittalofRegulationII,Rule2.0totheEPAasaSIPrevisionisexemptfromCEQA;andBEITFURTHERRESOLVEDthattheAirPollutionControlOfficerisauthorizedtomakenon-substantialchangesandtypographicalcorrectionstotherulesinconsultationwithDistrictCounselsolongasthechangesareconsistentwiththeDistrict'smissionandgoals.PASSEDANDADOPTEDbytheBoardofDirectorsoftheFeatherRiverAirQualityManagementDistrictatapublicmeetingonFebruary3,2014,bythefollowingvote:AYES:DirectorsGriego,Nicoletti,Cleveland,Whiteaker,Baland,Selvidge,PendergraphNOES:NoneABSENT:DirectorMungerandDukesABSTAIN:NoneATTEST.CLERKOFTHEDISTRICTBOARDPROVEDFORLEGALFORMLegalCouncil
From: Jason Coleman To: Kordzi, Joe Cc: Jed Leibbrandt ; Carmon McCain Subject: Re: Information Request Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:06:30 AM Attachments: image001.png image001.png



### Joe: You should have received all information that is responsive to the request. The polygon defines the contiguous acreage attached to the Tolk station, which reported the 3.3 acre-inches per acre in 2012. That 3.3 acre-inches was reported across the 47,188 acres. Completing the math, that is about 13,000 ac-ft for the Tolk station in 2012.
Regards Jason
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 11, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Kordzi, Joe < Kordzi.Joe@epa.gov > wrote:

I think this is for Plant X. I need the info for Tolk. It is located WNW from Plant X at 34°11'5.87"N, 102°34'11.11"W. Thanks.

From: Jed Leibbrandt [ mailto:jed.leibbrandt@hpwd.com ] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 4:12 PM To: Kordzi, Joe Cc: Jason Coleman; Carmon McCain Subject: Information Request

Joe, I have attached a map of the reporting area for the Tolk station that includes the nearby wells. I have also included the production data for those wells in a spreadsheet.

We only have production data going back to 2012, when the rules were first put in place. You will also notice missing data due to the voluntary nature of the reporting process at the time. Going forward production reports will be required in one form or another. There has only been one usage amount reported for the Tolk station which was 3.3 acre feet in 2012.

Let me know If you have any questions.

Jed Leibbrandt GIS Specialist HPWD 806.762.0181 <image001.png>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2735]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-32,532; TA-W-32, 532G; TA-W-32, 532H; TA-W-32, 532I; TA-W-32, 
532J; TA-W-32, 532K]


Orbit Industries, Inc., Helen, Georgia, et al.; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on August 9, 1996, applicable to 
all workers of Orbit Industries, Incorporated located in Helen, 
Georgia. The notice was published in the Federal Register on September 
13, 1996 (61 FR 48504). The worker certification was amended September 
30, 1996 and again on November 21, 1996, to include other manufacturing 
facilities of the subject firm. Those notices were published in the 
Federal Register on October 16, 1996 (61 FR 53937) and December 5, 1996 
(61 FR 64538), respectively.
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Based on new information 
received by the company, the Department is once again amending the 
certification to cover workers at affiliate plants of the subject firm, 
Claco Manufacturing Company, Hayesville, North Carolina; Hiawassee 
Garment Company, Hiawassee, Georgia; Academy Garment Company, Conelia, 
Georgia; and Orbit Industries, Inc. locations in Alto, Georgia and New 
York, New York. Each of these plants have closed. The workers were 
engaged in employment related to the production of apparel.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Orbit Industries adversely affected by increased imports of 
apparel.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-32,532 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Orbit Industries, Incorporated, Helen, Georgia 
(TA-W-32,532), Claco Manufacturing, Hayesville, North Carolina (TA-
W-532G), Hiawassee Garment Company, Hiawassee, Georgia (TA-W-
32,532H), Academy Garment Company, Conelia, Georiga (TA-W-32,532I), 
Orbit Industries, Inc., New York, New York (TA-W-32,532J) and Orbit 
Industries, Inc., Alto, Georgia (TA-W-32,532K), who became totally 
or partially separated from employment on or after June 24, 1995 are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of January 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-2735 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### N. F. JONES and Alberta Jones, his wife, Petitioners, v. Bill WELLMAN and Gussie Wellman, his wife, Respondents.

No. 38887.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 17, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed. 233 So.2d 572.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0147

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM067AD

767-78A0089, R4 --- 3/6/08

767-78A0089, R3 --- 12/18/03

767-78A0089, R2 --- 3/13/03

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.2    
  


 
 
 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    
  


        In connection with the Annual Report of TPG N.V. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period
ended 31 December 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.G. Haars, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 



	(1)
	the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



	(2)
	the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 







	19 February 2003	 	 
	 	 	 
	

/s/  J.G. HAARS      
 J.G. Haars

Chief Financial Officer	
 	

 











QuickLinks


Exhibit 10.2

CERTIFICATION – J.G. Haars, CFO, TPG N.V.
#### William Christopher O’BRIEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2170.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 22, 1970.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Bruce J. Daniels, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James M. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence are severally affirmed on the authority of Johnson v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 811; Baker v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 441; Baker v. State, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 687; Ross v. State, Fla.App. 1959, 112 So.2d 69; Buchanan v. State, Fla.App.1959, 111 So.2d 51.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN and OWEN, JJ„ concur.