alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

District Department of the Environment 

Office of the Director 

* * * 

_ - 

June 6, 2014 

Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region III (Mail Code: 3RA00) 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Subject: District of Columbia's Infrastructure SIP Revision for the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide 

Standards 

~wh 

Dear ~r - Garvin: 

Pursuant to the authority set forth in the District of Columbia Air Pollution Control Act of 1984 

("the Act"), Mayor's Order 98-44, dated April 10, 1998, and Mayor's Order 2006-61, dated June 

14, 2006, the District of Columbia (District) is hereby requesting approval of a revision to its 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted in accordance with the requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 

51. The District is requesting approval of this SIP revision to meet certain federal Clean Air Act 

requirements under Section 110(a)(2). The SIP revision describes how the District is 

implementing the "infrastructure" elements for the 2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2) national ambient 

air quality standards (NAAQS). 

A Notice of Public Hearing and Public Comment Period was posted in the D. C. Register on 

April 18, 2014 (61 DCR 17: 003977, Notice ID 4852345). 

The following are included with this SIP submittal package: 

• One paper copy of the Infrastructure SIP submittal for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS; 

• Public hearing notice; 

• Hearing officer's certification; 

• One paper copy of the D.C. Official Code § 8-101.05 (2013 Repl.) as a reference; 

• One paper copy of the D.C. Official Code § 8-151.07 (2013 Repl.) as a reference; 

• One disk containing an electronic version of the SIP revision. The electronic version 

includes an exact duplicate of the paper copy of the SIP revision submittal. 

DISTRICT ~ 

DEPARTMENT 

OF THE 

ENVIRONMENT 

green forward 

1200 First St. NE, 5`h Floor, Washington, DC 20002 1 tel: 202.535.2600 1 web:ddoe.dc.gov 

~r 

~ 
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (202) 535- 

2615, or Ms. Cecily Beall, Associate Director for the Air Quality Division, at (202) 535-2626. 

Sincerely, 

~ 

Vith A. Anderson 

Director 

Enclosure 

cc: Diana Esher, Director, Air Protection Division, EPA Region 3 

Cecily Beall, Associate Director, Air Quality Division, DDOE
#### Herman Robert DAVIS, Jr. v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50427.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 19, 1978.

Roy Pitts, Meridian, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Carolyn B. Mills, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
*2i*C.C.P.A.(Patents)

#### In re CANADA DRY GINGER ALE, Inc.*

Patent Appeals No. 3697.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

Feb. 1, 1937.

*738Edward S. Rogers, of Chicago, 111., and Thomas L. Mead, Jr., of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

*

Rehearing denied March 22, 1937.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This is one of three associated cases in which appeals have been taken from decisions of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Examiner denying registration to appellant of certain marks for use as trade-marks upon maltless beverages sold as soft drinks, the particular product most often referred to being ginger ale. The two other cases are In re Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Incorporated, 86 F.(2d) 830, 24 C.C.P.A. (Patents) -, decided December 21, 1936, and In re Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Incorporated, 87 F.(2d) 736, 24 C.C.P.A. (Patents) -, decided concurrently herewith.

Certain of the reasoning' in the first of the above-named cases is applicable here and, in the last of the cases the issue of this case is in effect determined. It is, therefore, unnecessary to enter upon any elaborate discussion here. The mark involved in this case comprises the words “Canada Dry” without their being associated with any map or other symbol or words. As recited in the case last named, supra, these words were disclaimed by appellant’s predecessor in registration No. 155,002. Upon the authority of the last-named case, supra, and the cases therein cited, it is here held that appellant, by reason of the disclaimer, is now estopped from securing registration of “Canada Dry,” and the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, so adjudging, is affirmed.

Affirmed.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: United  States--Gulf Coast, Louisiana, New Orleans harbor, Chalmette slip to  Southport [electronic resource]
SuDocs Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> C 55.418/7:11368/
Item    Number: 0191-B-13    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000868658
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11368-1-1995.jpg
2012-03-30 16:07
37M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11368-1-1995.pdf
2012-03-30 16:34
37M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11368-12-1992.jpg
2012-03-30 16:06
32M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11368-12-1992.pdf
2012-03-30 16:32
32M
 
 
 
 
 

 [if !supportMisalignedColumns]>   [endif]>  
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  May 19, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3419 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1765 Camp Hill Bypass in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘John Charles Traub Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3419 ES

1 SECTION 1. JOHN CHARLES TRAUB POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1765 Camp Hill Bypass in Camp 

4 Hill, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘John Charles Traub Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John Charles Traub 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate April 23, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3419 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostTraub Post Office’’. Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘John Charles al Service located at 1765 Camp Hill Bypass in
## •i'iJtiN TO F February13 , 201 2 .:til\jHf>\MO N L i T o Who m I t Ma yConcern : 

## ;o 23 p i : u s I a m writin g thi s lette ri n suppor t o fSu n CountryAirline s retainin g thei rservic e t o Reaga n Airpor t i n Washingto n D.C . Pleas e referenc e t o Su n Countryslo t exemptio n Docke t No . FAA2012-0089 . Th e abilit yo fpassengers t o hav e th e choic e o fa n airlin e tha tactuall yoffer s fare s tha t ar e reasonabl e leavin g fro m Lansin g an d connectin g t o th e Eastwil l b e severel yimpacte d i fthi s servic e i s discontinued . Su n Countryhas provide d a comfortabl e an d saf e servic e fro m th e tim e tha t the yhav e flow n fro m Lansing . W e hav e ha d th e opportunit yt o fl ySu n Countrya fe wtime s an d hav e certainl yappreciate d th e convenienc e o fou rloca l airpor t(Capito l Cit yInternationa l Airport) . Su n Countr yhas provide d a saf e an d reliabl e servic e eac h tim e tha t w e hav e flown . Losin g thi s airlin e optio n wil l mos t certainl yaffec tth e economi cdevelopmen teffort s fo rth e Lansin g area . Lansin g need s t o b e abl e t o offe rsafe , reasonable , an d comfortabl e flight s - Su n Countryfill s thi s purpose . I fth e Washingto n D.C . optio n i s los t I a m concerne d tha tSu n Countr ywil l no tb e abl e t o surviv e wit h onl yth e Minneapoli s connection . I fthi s servic e wa s t o b e discontinue d an d Su n Countr y woul d no t b e availabl e a t Capito l Cit yInternationa l Airpor tthi s woul d limi tth e option s tha t mid-Michiga n passengers woul d hav e t o trave l West . Again , th e damag e t o th e Lansin g are a woul d b e formidabl e as th e airpor tan d th e are a woul d suffe reconomically . Lansin g need s t o retai n a sustainabl e airpor tservice . Pleas e conside rth e effect s tha t discontinuin g th e Washingto n D.C . servic e woul d hav e fo rth e Lansin g are a an d th e passengers wh o depen d o n th e airpor tfo rfligh t option s an d kee p thi s servic e available . Th e citizen s o f mid-Michiga n woul d b e mos t appreciative . Sincerely , Su e Settl e 302 5 Pint o Circl e Lansing , Michiga n 4890 6
#### William DEAN, Appellant, v. John Cabot SMITH, Appellee.

No. 69-141.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 11, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Martin County; Wallace Sample, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliancewith 40 CFR 51, Appendix V Key: C = Cornplete I = Incomplete NIA = NotApplicableTo Rule 

### 0 = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer December 30,2010 South CoastAQMD February 28,2011 

### C.G. Allen ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (perAppendix V, Section 2.1)

-- - - (b) Evidence of adoption 

# 1 (a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee

(c) StateIDistrict legal authorityto adopt (dl)Copy of actual rule/plan 

# I (g) Certification that hearingfulfilled public notice 

# I X 

# I X 

# / X 

# 1 X 

# I X X X (d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out (e) Proof that action met procedural requirements (f) Copy of public notice 

### X X

'TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2) 

# 1 (a) Regulated pollutants identified NIA NIA NIA NIA 

### X X NIA

X X (h) Public comments & agency response 

# 1 (b) Affected sources & attainment status identified 

# I X 

# I X 

# I X 

# I X 

# I X X X X NIA

X X 

### X


# I (f) Relianceon continuous emission reductions 

### X X X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact (d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration (e) Modelingsupport as appropriate 

### X X N/A

X X 

### X NIA X X 

### X

NIA NIA NIA (g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements (i) Justification for deviationfrom EPA policy
Notes: NIA NIA NIA

- NIA OVERALL COMPLE'TENESS NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA 

### C NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA



### C NIA N/A NIA



### C CEPA Region9 SIP COMPLETENESSCHECKLIST To evaluate compliancewith 40 CFR 51, Appendix V Key: C = Complete I = Incomplete NIA 

### = Not Applicable To Rule 

### 0 = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer December 30,2010 South CoastAQMD February 28,2011 

### C.G.Allen 

# I (b) Evidenceof adoption 

## Ix/xIxlxI ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (perAppendix V, Section2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governorldesignee 

# 1 (dl) Copy of actual rulelplan 

### X X X X - - (c) StateIDistrict legalauthority to adopt (d2) Rulechanges indicatedby underline/cross-out 

# I NIA 

# 1 NIA 

# I N/A 

# I N/A 

# I X X 

# I (h) Public comments & agency response 

### ~XIx~XIx~ X X
(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements (f) Copy of public notice (g) Certificationthat hearing fulfilled public notice 

### X X
X X X 'TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(f) Relianceoncontinuousemissionreductions 

# 1 NIA 

# I NIA 

# 1 NIA 

# I NIA 

# 1 X

(a) Regulated pollutants identified (b) Affected sources & attainment status identified (c) Rulelplan emissions impact 

### I (d) Attainment. PSD & other required demonstration



### (e) Modeling support as appropriate

~ - 

# I (g) Evidenceof limits & other needed requGments 

# IN/A 

# 1 NIT] X
X X X
NIA



### X NIA NIA NIA 

### X X X

I I I I


### Notes: 

### X X X

NIA NIA NIA (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy NIA 

### X NIA



### X

OVERALL COMPLETENESS NIA 

### X NIA NIA NIA
NIA



### C 

### C NIA NIA NIA
NIA 

### C C NIA NIA
#### Trella Mathews WHITMAN, Petitioner, v. Joy Marie SLOAN and James Sloan, her husband, Respondents.

No. 70-11.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 17, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed.
127 STAT. 578 PUBLIC LAW 113–50—NOV. 21, 2013 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2747: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013): 

Sept. 10, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 5, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–50 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to transfer certain functions from the 

Government Accountability Office to the Department of Labor relating to the 

processing of claims for the payment of workers who were not paid appropriate 

wages under certain provisions of such title. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Streamlining Claims Processing 

for Federal Contractor Employees Act’’. 

SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. 

(a) AUTHORITY OF COMPTROLLER GENERAL TO PAY WAGES AND

LIST CONTRACTORS VIOLATING CONTRACTS.—Section 3144 of title 

40, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘of Comptroller 

General’’; and 

(2) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘Comptroller General’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Secretary of Labor’’. 

(b) REPORT OF VIOLATIONS AND WITHHOLDING OF AMOUNTS

FOR UNPAID CONTRACTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.—Section 

3703(b)(3) of title 40, United States Code, is amended by striking 

‘‘Comptroller General’’ both places it appears and inserting ‘‘Secretary of Labor’’. 

Approved November 21, 2013. 

40 USC 101 note. 

Streamlining 

Claims 

Processing for 

Federal 

Contractor 

Employees Act. 

Nov. 21, 2013 

[H.R. 2747] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
# Instructions

# Section 1

SECTION 1 - LEADERSHIP

SCORE

# Section 2

SECTION 2 - ADMINISTRATION

SCORE

# Section 3

SECTION 3 - PLANNING (PART 1)

SCORE

SECTION 3 - PLANNING (PART 2)

SCORE

# Section 4

SECTION  4 - IMPLEMENTATION

SCORE

# Section 5

SECTION  5 - EVALUATION

SCORE

# Summary

HSIP SELF ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

SECTION TOTAL
Memorandum

Subject: INFORMATION: Change to the June 30, 2018 Date: JUN 2 8 2018 

sunset date in the AASHTO/FHW A Joint 

Implementation Agreement for the AASHTO 

Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, 2016 

Edition 

From: Michael S. Griffith In Reply Refer To: 

Director, Office of Safety Technologies HSST-1 

To: Division Administrators 

Directors of Field Services 

Federal Lands Highway Division Directors 

PURPOSE 

The purpose of this memorandum is to announce exceptions to the June 30, 2018 sunset 

date for w-beam terminals relative to implementing the AASHTO Manual for Assessing 

Safety Hardware (MASH), 2016 Edition. 

INFORMATION 

AASHTO and FHW A release the following change to the AASHTO/FHW A Joint 

Implementation Plan for implementing AASHTO MASH, 2016 Ed~tion. The change 

extends the deadline date for certain w-beam guardrail terminals to December 31 , 2019 

as described below. 

What is included in the June 30, 2018, sunset date in the AASHTO/FHW A Joint 

Implementation Agreement? 

The AASHTO/FHW A Joint Implementation Agreement states that for contracts on the 

National Highway System with a letting date after June 30, 2018, new permanent 

installations and full replacements of w- beam terminals must be MASH 2016-

compliant. This sunset date now only covers tangent terminals. Other applications, 

such as double-sided or median terminals, flared terminals, and terminals installed on a 

flare, are included in the December 31 , 2019, sunset date for "all other terminals." 

This change supplements the Q&A document dated May 9, 2018 entitled "Clarifications 

on Implementing the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, 2016." This 

information, along with additional MASH implementation resources, may be accessed 

at: https://design.transportation.org/mash-implementation/. 
2 

SUMMARY 

Please share this memorandum with your State DOT. AASHTO and FHW A will 

continue to monitor the implementation of AASHTO' s MASH and will provide 

clarification and changes as needed on the above referenced website. If you need 

further information, please contact William P. Longstreet at 202-366-0087.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3078 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3078

 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of 
  higher education that authorize Anti-Semitic events on campus from 
participating in the student loan and grant programs under title IV of 
                               such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 18, 2023

 Mr. Scott of South Carolina (for himself, Mrs. Britt, Mrs. Blackburn, 
Mrs. Hyde-Smith, and Mr. Lankford) introduced the following bill; which 
  was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 
                          Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of 
  higher education that authorize Anti-Semitic events on campus from 
participating in the student loan and grant programs under title IV of 
                               such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Anti-Semitism on College 
Campuses Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF ANTISEMITIC EVENTS ON CAMPUS.

    Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(30)(A) The institution will not authorize, facilitate, 
        provide funding for, or otherwise support any event promoting 
        Anti-Semitism on campus.
            ``(B) In this paragraph, the term `Anti-Semitism' has the 
        meaning given the working definition of Anti-Semitism adopted 
        by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance on May 26, 
        2016, including the contemporary examples of Anti-Semitism 
        cited by the Alliance.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

From:

Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 3:11 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: No JP in our soil & water!

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Aloha EPA 

------------------------------ 

Back in 1975, while assigned to the Squadron, “

, the ship was incapable of producing sufficient water for operations, so we had to tank with a 

converted oiler every so often. You couldn’t taste it during the day, but after taps and the stirrer was shut down, you 

couldn’t drink the water due to the extreme JP-5 kerosene taste (I imagine JP-8 doesn’t taste any different). The first 

time I took a drink from the scuttlebutt in the island on night check, I had to spit it out immediately. From that point 

on, I had some very strange skin problems, and in sick bay, I became known as “The Cyst.” 

During a Captain’s Call, someone asked the CO what the funky taste in the water was and we were told it was salt 

water intrusion. They actually believed we didn’t know the difference between kerosene and salt. Many years later, I 

discovered there is an additive in jet fuel to prevent an organism from living in kerosene, whose excreta dissolves 

aluminum, which is not be healthy for us, either. 

That aquifer must be tested periodically for toxic contamination. I compare this to what happened to the Marine 

Corps Recruit Training Base at Parris Island, SC with the toxic contamination they had for so long. When the Master 

Sergeant’s daughter died as a result of it, he went on a one man crusade to clean up the mess. There is already 

enough angst over the US military being in Hawai'i after the Bayonet Constitution in 1898, where the Navy and 

Marines assisted the sugar barons in overthrowing Queen Lili’uokalani. Just something to consider. 

--------------------------------------------------- 

Aloha, 

 

!
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 97-40224

Summary Calendar

__________________

DAVID MUDGE,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RON CAWTHON, Chief Jailer;

DAVID PETRUSAITIS; Aransas County Jail,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. C-96-CV-655

- - - - - - - - - -

November 25, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Mudge, Texas prisoner #689684, appeals from the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for

failure to comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Because the district court’s dismissal order was silent

regarding whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice,

the dismissal “operates as an adjudication upon the merits,”

i.e., as a dismissal with prejudice. Rule 41(b); see Nagle v.
No. 97-40224

-2-

Lee, 807 F.2d 435, 442-43 (5th Cir. 1988). “A dismissal with

prejudice is appropriate only if the failure to comply with the

court order was the result of purposeful delay or

contumaciousness and the record reflects that the district court

employed lesser sanctions before dismissing the action.” Long v.

Simmons, 77 F.3d 878, 880 (5th Cir. 1996). 

The record does not indicate that Mudge failed to comply

with the court’s order to secure a delay or out of

contumaciousness or that the district court employed lesser

sanctions before dismissing the action. Therefore, the district

court abused its discretion in dismissing the action. See id. 

The district court’s judgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED

for further proceedings.