alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jean-Yves Dexmier, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.

Date: May 7, 2010



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Jean-Yves Dexmier  
|Name:  |  | Jean-Yves Dexmier      
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

I, Stephen C. Markowski, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
LookSmart, Ltd.

Date: May 7, 2010



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Stephen C. Markowski
|Name:  |  | Stephen C. Markowski    
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer 

This certification accompanies
the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of _ LookSmart, Ltd. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### James L. KOSTKA and Chicago Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Appellants, v. Terry Lee BISHOP, Appellee.

No. 70-44.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 2, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
#### David RICH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-744.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 12, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 26, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Opinion issued February 10, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-21-00380-CV

———————————

ALISSA CATHERINE ALLEN, Appellant

V.

HOUSTON HOUSE HI RISE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1169929

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Alissa Catherine Allen, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.6(a), 38.8(a). After being notified that this appeal was subject to 

dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
2

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a 

brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Countiss, and Guerra.
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 2006 - Present SD Motor Vehicle Traffic Accident 

Reporting Instruction Manual 2006

Incapacitating Injury A

Incapacitating Injury: Any injury, other than a fatal injury, which prevents the injured person 

from walking, driving, or normally continuing the activities the person was capable of 

performing before the injury occurred. Included: Severe lacerations, broken or distorted 

limbs, skull or chest injuries, abdominal injuries, unconsciousness at or when taken from the 

scene, unable to leave the accident scene without assistance. 

Excluded: Momentary unconsciousness

9 Injury Status codes & definitions found on 

Manual pg22-23 (PDF pg27-28).

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE STATE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 2006 - Present

State of ND Investigator's Motor Vehicle 

Traffic Accident Report 2003,

SD Motor Vehicle Traffic Accident 

Reporting Instruction Manual 2006

Pedestrian 5 No definition found. 7. Unit Type code found on Manual pg27. 

Pedalcyclist 2006 - Present

Pedalcycle 6 No definition found. 7. Unit Type code found on Manual pg27. 

South Dakota
• Death/serious injury is unacceptable: • Humans make mistakes/humans are vulnerable:

for all road users. • Responsibility is shared:

National Context

Regional Context

SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

This Case Study is part of the Safe System Approach for Speed Management Report: Click here to read the full report here.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

Process

The 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• Land use

• 

• 

• 
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH FOR SPEED MANAGEMENT

. Table 11 

Rural Roads 

(Option 3G)

City Centre 

(Option 4E)

Urban Roads 

(Option 2A)

Residential 

(Option 2A)

Town Centres 

(Option 4A)

TOTAL 86.6 99.1% $22–$27 million

. 

. 

.
IF YOU SEE SOMETHING, SAY SOMETHING:

The 5 Different Ways You Can Help When Witnessing Harassment.

DISTRACT

Connect with 

the Victim or 

Harasser, change 

the subject, sing, 

etc. Diffuses 

tension.

DELEGATE

Report the 

event/staying 

behind the 

scenes.

DOCUMENT

Record/Take 

notes during 

event. Ask victim 

what they want 

to do with the 

documentation. 

DELAY

Support the 

victim afterward. 

“I’m sorry that 

happened to you”.

DIRECT

Confront 

harasser. Repeat, 

“This is not 

appropriate”. 

Tend to escalate. 

Where you can report harassment:

* Mandatory Reporting Obligation-Must Report Harassment to the Anti- Harassment

Coordinator

1. Management*

2. Anti-Harassment and Equity Coordinator *

Anita Heard

Anita.Heard@dot.gov

202-366-1607

3. Internal EEO Complaint Program Manager*

Nikisha Bennett

Nikisha.Bennett@dot.gov

202-366-3894

4. Employee Relations*
IF YOU SEE SOMETHING, SAY SOMETHING:

The 5 Different Ways You Can Help When Witnessing Harassment.

DISTRACT

Connect with 

the Victim or 

Harasser, change 

the subject, sing, 

etc. Diffuses 

tension.

DELEGATE

Report the 

event/staying 

behind the 

scenes.

DOCUMENT

Record/Take 

notes during 

event. Ask victim 

what they want 

to do with the 

documentation. 

DELAY

Support the 

victim afterward. 

“I’m sorry that 

happened 

to you”.

DIRECT

Confront 

harasser. Repeat, 

“This is not 

appropriate”. 

Tend to escalate. 

Where you

* Mandatory Reporting Obligation-Must Report Harassment to the Anti- Harassment 

Coordinator

can report harassment:

1. Management*

2. Anti-Harassment and Equity Coordinator *

Anita Heard

Anita.Heard@dot.gov

202-366-1607

3. Internal EEO Complaint Program Manager*

Nikisha Bennett

Nikisha.Bennett@dot.gov

202-366-3894

4. Employee Relations*
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27935]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION


Advisory Committee on Presidential Libraries Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Advisory Committee on Presidential 
Libraries will meet on Wednesday, November 5, 1997, from 9 a.m. to 12 
noon, in the Conference Room of the Bush Presidential Library, 1000 
George Bush Drive West, College Station, Texas.
    The agenda for the meeting will be the Presidential library 
programs and a discussion of future Presidential libraries.
    The meeting will be open to the public. For further information, 
call David F. Peterson at (301) 713-6050.

    Dated: October 17, 1997.
Mary Ann Hadyka,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-27935 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
#### John M. BICKERSTAFF, Petitioner, v. Donald B. FRAZIER and Saarnell G. Frazier, his wife, Respondents.

No. 39421.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 23, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed. 232 So.2d 190.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             324,422
<SECURITIES>                                       170,199
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,403,613
<ALLOWANCES>                                       212,418
<INVENTORY>                                      6,344,722
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,867,162
<PP&E>                                           6,781,434
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,351,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,814,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,498,253
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              2
<COMMON>                                           114,133
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,539,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,814,198
<SALES>                                         31,180,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,180,354
<CGS>                                           21,145,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,877,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,000,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,078,108
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,003,108
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,003,108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .27
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                  APPLIEDTHEORY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                CALCULATION OF LOSS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED) (1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                 JUNE 30, 2001
                                                               ------------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
       Shares outstanding at beginning of period                       26,432,341
       Weighted average shares issued during three months
       ended June 30, 2001 (1,122,897 shares)                             634,149
                                                                  ---------------
                                                                       27,066,490
                                                                  ===============
Net loss                                                          $   (16,857,000)
                                                                  ===============

Loss per share attributable to common stockholders                $        (0.62)
                                                                  ===============
</TABLE>



===============================================================================

(1)  For a discussion of loss per share, see Note D of the Notes to the
     Financial Statements provided in Part I, Item 1 of our Form 10-Q for the
     period ended June 30, 2001.


                                      46
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3357 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

5120 Derry Street in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Hettie Simmons 

Love Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2023 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. FETTERMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5120 Derry Street in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Hettie Simmons Love Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HETTIE SIMMONS LOVE POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 5120 Derry Street in Harris7 burg, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Hettie Simmons Love Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3357 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Hettie Simmons Love 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DAVID K. LORD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 08-213 Erie

v. )

)

ERIE COUNTY, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on July 25, 2008, and

was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and

recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and

Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 19], filed on

December 1, 2009, recommended that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Erie

County [Doc. No. 16] be granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the Magistrate

Judge recommended that the motion should be granted as to the procedural due

process claim and breach of contract claim, and denied as to the remainder of the

§ 1983 claims. 

The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. 

Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. Plaintiff filed

objections on December 10, 2009 [Doc. No. 21]. After de novo review of the motion

and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and

objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 5 day of January, 2010; th

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Erie

County [Doc. No. 16] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the motion is

GRANTED as to the procedural due process claim and breach of contract claim, and

DENIED as to the remainder of the § 1983 claims. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 19] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

Case 1:08-cv-00213-SJM-SPB Document 24 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 2
2

on December 1, 2009, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:08-cv-00213-SJM-SPB Document 24 Filed 01/05/10 Page 2 of 2
# L_2005299EN.01008001.xml

| 16.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 299/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 299/80

---

COUNCIL COMMON POSITION 2005/793/CFSP

of 14 November 2005

concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 15 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 21 May 2002, the Council adopted Common Position 2002/400/CFSP concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians (1) and granting them national permits for entry into, and stay in, their territory valid for a period of up to 12 months. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 21 May 2002, the Council adopted Common Position 2002/400/CFSP concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians (1) and granting them national permits for entry into, and stay in, their territory valid for a period of up to 12 months.

| (2) | By Common Positions 2003/366/CFSP (2), 2004/493/CFSP (3) and 2004/748/CFSP (4), the Council decided that the validity of these permits should be extended by 12 months and, subsequently, by 6 and 12 months, respectively. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

By Common Positions 2003/366/CFSP (2), 2004/493/CFSP (3) and 2004/748/CFSP (4), the Council decided that the validity of these permits should be extended by 12 months and, subsequently, by 6 and 12 months, respectively.

| (3) | The validity of those permits should be extended for a further period of 12 months, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The validity of those permits should be extended for a further period of 12 months,

HAS ADOPTED THIS COMMON POSITION:

Article 1

The Member States referred to in Article 2 of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP shall extend the validity of the national permits for entry and stay granted pursuant to Article 3 of that Common Position for a further period of 12 months.

Article 2

The Council shall evaluate the application of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP within 6 months of the adoption of this Common Position.

Article 3

This Common Position shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Article 4

This Common Position shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 November 2005.

For the Council

The President

T. JOWELL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 138, 28.5.2002, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 51.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 181, 18.5.2004, p. 24.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 329, 4.11.2004, p. 20.

4

---
#### Larry J. TARNABINE v. Sharon Ballard HENDERSON et al.

No. 49733.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 4, 1978.

Bullard, Campbell & Gee, R. W. Gee, Vicksburg, for appellant.

Dyer, Dyer & Dyer, Howard Dyer, III, Greenville, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Washington County; Ernest Kellner, Chancellor.

Before INZER, P. J., and SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.20

[LETTERHEAD OF CSX CORPORATION]

                                                       Jeff McCutcheon
                                                       Senior Vice President
                                                       Corporate Human Resources

                                                     November 18, 2002

Mr. Charles G. Raymond
President
CSX Lines, Inc.
2101 Rexford Road
Suite 350, West
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211

Dear Chuck:

       This letter serves to amend the Transaction Incentive Program for CSX
Lines described in a latter I sent you January 4, 2002. In this letter, I stated
that an incentive Bonus would only be paid if there was Closing of the
Transaction (as defined in the letter) by December 31, 2002.

       Through this letter, CSX will amend the January 4, 2002 letter by
extending the deadline of a closing of the transaction an additional six months.
Accordingly, the third paragraph of your January 4, 2002 letter should now read
as follows:

            "The Incentive Bonus will be paid only if there is a Closing of a
       Transaction by June 30, 2003. For purposes of this letter, a "Closing"
       means that a transaction to sell or dispose of all, or substantially all,
       of the assets of CSX Lines must be completed prior to June 30, 2003. If
       no such Closing occurs by June 30, 2003, this program will expire without
       payment."

       All other provisions of the letter remain unchanged.

       Please indicate your agreement with and acceptance of the terms and
conditions of this letter by signing and dating this letter in the space
provided below. Keep one original for your records and return the other original
to me.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             Jeff McCutcheon

Agreed to and accepted:

/s/ CHARLES G. RAYMOND
______________________________
Charles G. Raymond
HOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       12346          Edition:       12          Edition       Date: August       2013          Clear       Dates: NM - 10/26/2013     LNM -       10/15/2013      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons and               drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.               
-               Click the arrow buttons to               pan left/right and up/down.
-               Drag the navigation box in               the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
No. D-2214.

#### In re Disbarment of Hendershot.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see *ante,*p. 1007.]
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-95,435-01

EX P ARTE JUAN CARLOS BALDERASCASTRO, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION F OR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. C-4-W012398-1660977-A IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4 F ROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Applicant pleaded guilty and was convicted of driving while intox icated with a child under 15 years of ag e, with an affirmative d eadly w eapon finding , and sentenced to 6 months in State J ail. Applicant filed this a

p p lication for a writ o f habeas corpus in the county o f conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . a rt. 11.07. Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary b ecause the sentence the parties ag reed to is illeg al. B ased on the record, the trial court has determined that Applicant’s plea was involuntary because the sentence is outside the statutory rang e and is therefore illeg al. Relief is g r a

nted. Brady v. United States , 397 U. S

. 7 4 2 ( 1 9 7 0 ). The judg ment in cause number 1660977 in the Criminal District Court No. 4 District Court of Tarrant County is set aside,2

and Applicant is r emanded to the custody of the Sheriff of T arrant County to answer the charg es as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within ten day s from the date of this Court’s mandate. C o p i e s o f t

h i s o pinion shall b e sent to the T ex as Department of Criminal J ustice–C o r r e c t i o n a l Institutions Division and the B oard of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: April 17, 2024 Do not publish