U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey Ave. , SE 

of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590 

Federal Highway 

Administration February 1, 20 17 

In Reply Refer To: 

HSST-1 /B-271 

Mr. Felipe Almanza 

TrafFix Devices Inc. 

160 A venida La Pata 

San Clemente, CA 92673 

Dear Mr. Almanza: 

This letter is in response to your September 26, 2016 request for the Federal Highway 

Administration (FHW A) to review a roadside safety device, hardware, or system for eligibility 

for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program. This FHWA letter of eligibility is 

assigned FHWA control number B-271 and is valid until a subsequent letter is issued by FHWA 

that expressly references this device. 

Decision 

The following devices are eligible, with details provided in the form which is attached as an 

integral part of this letter: 

• MASH TrafFix Water Wall TL-1 

Scope of this Letter 

To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding, new roadside safety devices should meet the crash 

test and evaluation criteria contained in the American Association of State Highway and 

Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). 

However, the FHW A, the Department of Transportation, and the United States Government do 

not regulate the manufacture of roadside safety devices. Eligibility for reimbursement under the 

Federal-aid highway program does not establish approval, certification or endorsement of the 

device for any particular purpose or use. 

This letter is not a determination by the FHWA, the Department of Transportation, or the United 

States Government that a vehicle crash involving the device will result in any particular outcome, 

nor is it a guarantee of the in-service performance of this device. Proper manufacturing, 

installation, and maintenance are required in order for this device to function as tested. 

This finding of eligibility is limited to the crashworthiness of the system and does not cover other 

structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 
2 

Eligibility for Reimbursement 

Based solely on a review of crash test results and certifications submitted by the manufacturer, 

and the crash test laboratory, FHWA agrees that the device described herein meets the crash test 

and evaluation criteria of the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). 

Therefore, the device is eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program if 

installed under the range of tested conditions. 

Name of system: MASH TrafFix Water Wall 


Type of system: Longitudinal Barrier 


Test Level: MASH Test Level 1 (TLl) 


Testing conducted by: KARCO 


Date of request: September 28, 2016 


Date initially acknowledged: October 2, 2016 


Date of completed package: December 16, 2016 


FHW A concurs with the recommendation of the accredited crash testing laboratory as stated 

within the attached form. 

Full Description of the Eligible Device 

The device and supporting documentation, including reports of the crash tests or other testing 

done, videos of any crash testing, and/or drawings of the device, are described in the attached 

form. 

Notice 

If a manufacturer makes any modification to any of their roadside safety hardware that has an 

existing eligibility letter from FHW A, the manufacturer must notify FHW A of such modification 

with a request for continued eligibility for reimbursement. The notice of all modifications to a 

device must be accompanied by: 

o 	 Significant modifications - For these modifications, crash test results must be 

submitted with accompanying documentation and videos. 

o 	 Non-signification modifications - For these modifications, a statement from the 

crash test laboratory on the potential effect of the modification on the ability of 

the device to meet the relevant crash test criteria. 

FHW A's determination of continued eligibility for the modified hardware will be based on 

whether the modified hardware will continue to meet the relevant crash test criteria. 

Any user or agency relying on this eligibility letter is expected to use the same designs, 

specifications, drawings, installation and maintenance instructions as those submitted for review. 

You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the same chemistry, 

mechanicaJ properties, and geometry as that submitted for review, and that it will meet the test 

and evaluation criteria of the AASHTO MASH. 
3 

Issuance of this letter does not convey property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege. This 

letter is based on the premise that information and reports submitted by you are accurate and 

correct. We reserve the right to modify or revoke this letter if: ( 1) there are any inaccuracies in 

the information submitted in support of your request for this letter, (2) the qualification testing 

was flawed, (3) in-service performance or other information reveals safety problems, ( 4) the 

system is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, or (5) any other 

information indicates that the letter was issued in error or otherwise does not reflect full and 

complete information about the crash worthiness of the system. 

Standard Provisions 

• 	 To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of eligibility designated as FHWA 

control number B-271 shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test 

documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and 

documentation may be reviewed upon request. 

• 	 This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHW A to use, 

manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder. 

• 	 Ifthe subject device is a patented product it may be considered to be proprietary. If 

proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects: 

(a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented 

items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization 

with the existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists; or ( c) 

they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short 

sections of road for experimental purposes. Our regulations concerning proprietary 

products are contained in Title 23 , Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411. 

Sincerely, 

Scott T. Johnson 

Acting Director, Office of Safety 

Technologies 

Office of Safety 

Enclosures 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 1 of 5 

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility 

of Highway Safety Hardware 

... 

QI

.... 

:!::! 

E 

..c 

Date of Request: September 26, 2016 I r. New (' Resubmission 

Name: Felipe Almanza 

Company: TrafFix Devices Inc. 

Address : 160 Avenida La Pata 

United States ::I 

V) Country: 

To: Michael S. Griffith, Director 

FHWA, Office of Safety Technologies 

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid 

highway program. 

Device & Testing.Criterion - Enter from right to left starting with Test Level Fl 

System Type Submission Type Device Name I Variant Testing Criterion Test 

Level 

'B': Rigid/Semi-Rigid Barriers 

(Roadside, Median, Bridge 

Ra ilinasl 

(9 Physical Crash Testing 

(' Engineering Analysis 

MASH TrafFix Water Wall 

TL-1 

AASHTO MASH TL1 

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration, I certify 

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety 

Hardware and that the evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH . 

Individual or Organization responsible for the product: 

Contact Name: Felipe Almanza Same as Submitter ~ 

Company Name: TrafFix Devices Inc. Same as Submitter ~ 

Address: 160 Avenida La Pata Same as Submitter ~ 

Country: United States Same as Submitter ~ 

Enter below all disclosures of financial interests as required by the FHWA ' Federal-Aid Reimbursement 

Eligibility Process for Safety Hardware Devices' document. 

TrafFix Devices Inc. and Karco Engineering LLC share no financial interests between the two organizations. This 

includes no shared financial interest but not limited to: 

i. Compensation included wages, salaries, commissions, professional fees, or fees for business referrals 

iii. Research funding or other forms of research support; 

iv. Patents, copyrights, licenses, and other intellectual property interests; 

vi. Business ownership and investment interests; 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 2 of 5 

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 

(9 New Hardware or (' Modification to 

Significant Modification Existing Hardware 

The MASH TrafFix Water Wall TL­1 is a longitudinal barrier designed to contain, redirect, and shield vehicles 

from roadside obstacles while providing positive protection and separation between the traveling public and 

the personnel in the work zone. The MASH TrafFix Water Wall is free standing, does not require anchoring to 

the road surface, can be used on concrete, asphalt, gravel, and dirt surfaces. The surfaces used for these tests 

were concrete and dirt. 

A water wall system consists of a series of individual water filled modules that are connected to adjacent 

modules creating a continuous barrier wall. Adjoining modules can rotate up to 30 degrees at the connection, 

allowing the barrier wall to contour to varying road curvature. 

Individual modules have overall dimensions of 73 in (1.9 m) long, pin to pin X 18 in (0.46 m) wide X 32 in (0.8 m) 

tall. An empty module weights approx. 90 lbs. (41 kgs) and 1070.3 lbs. (485.5 kgs) when filled with water. The 

modules are manufactured from polyethylene that is UV stabilized that is orange and white in color. Orange 

and white barrier modules were the as tested colors the product may be produced in other colors. 

Permanently molded within the plastic modules are three corrosion resistant cables. The modules are 

designed with knuckles at the ends which contain a series of vertically aligned concentric holes that allow a 

steel t-pin to be inserted to connect adjacent modules together. When modules are pinned together there are 

a total of eight knuckles aligned with the steel t-pin inserted. This provides a positive connection between 

adjacent modules. 

Upon impact the plastic modules rupture, dispersing the contained water, simultaneously engaging and 

tightening the internal molded-in cable barrier. 

CRASH TESTING 

By signature below, the Engineer affiliated with the testing laboratory, agrees in support of this submission that 

all of the critical and relevant crash tests for this device listed above were conducted to meet the MASH test 

criteria. The Engineer has determined that no other crash tests are necessary to determine the device meets 

the MASH criteria. 

Engineer Name: Balbino A. Beltran 

Engineer Signature: Balbino A. Beltran Digitally signed by Balbino A. Beltran 

ON: cn=Balbino A. Beltran, o=KARCO Engineering, LLC., ou, 

email:abeltran@karco.com, c=US 

Date: 2016.09.23 18:27:41 -07'00' 

Address: 9270 Holly Road, Adelanto CA 92301 Same as Submitter D 

Country: United States Same as Submitter D 

A brief description of each crash test and its result : 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 3 of 5 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description 

Evaluation 

Results 

1-10 (11 OOC) 

The TrafFix Water Wall was angled 25° from 

the direction of the impacting vehicle. The 

side angle impact examines the barrier's 

ability to contain, re-direct, or bring the 

vehicle to a controlled stop. The vehicle 

should not penetrate the installation while 

controlled lateral deflection of the test 

article is acceptable. 

The test was conducted using a 

commercially available 2013 Kia Rio 4-door 

sedan with a test inertial mass of 2,428.3 lbs 

(1, 110.5 kg). The test vehicle impacted the 

barrier at a velocity of 32.45 mph (52.22 km/ 

hr) and at an impact angle of 24.7°. The as 

tested MASH Water Wall TL­1 consisted of 

25 water filled modules pinned together 

measuring 151 .8 ft (46.3 m) long, pin to pin. 

Upon initial contact with the first module 

the vehicle moved forward, impacted the 

adjacent module causing the module to 

rupture, dispersing the contained water, 

simultaneously engaging and tightening 

the internal molded-in cable barrier. The 

vehicle was contained on the traffic side of 

the barrier and was brought to a controlled 

stop 46.3 ft. (14.1 m) longitudinally 

(downstream) and 2.3 ft . (0.7 m) lateral 

(toward non traffic side) from the initial 

point of contact. The barrier had a 

maximum working width of 8.9 ft (2.7 m) 

and a maximum dynamic deflection of 6.9 

ft. (2.1 m). 

The vehicle remained upright throughout 

the impact event. The test vehicle's 

occupant compartment was not penetrated 

and there was no measureable in cab 

deformation. The maximum roll and pitch 

angle did not exceed 75° and occupant risk 

values were within limits per MASH 

specifications for Occupant impact Velocity 

(OIV) and Ridedown Acceleration (RA) 

PASS 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 4 of 5 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description 

Evaluation 

Results 

1-11 (2270P) 

The TrafFix Water Wall was angled 25° from 

the direction of the impacting vehicle. The 

side angle impact examines the barrier's 

ability to contain, re-direct, or bring the 

vehicle to a controlled stop. The vehicle 

should not penetrate the installation while 

controlled lateral deflection of the test 

article is acceptable. 

The test was conducted using a 

commercially available 2012 RAM 1500 4­

door with a test inertial mass of 5,021 .0 lbs. 

(2,277.5 kg). The test vehicle impacted the 

barrier at a velocity of 31 .21 mph (50.23 km/ 

hr) and at an impact angle of 24.9°. The as 

tested MASH Water Wall TL-1 consisted of 

25 water filled modules pinned together, 

measu ring 151 .8 ft. (46.3 m) long, pin to pin. 

Upon initial contact with the first module 

the vehicle moved forward, impacted the 

adjacent module 'causing the module to 

rupture, dispersing the contained water, 

simultaneously engaging and tightening 

the internal molded-in cable barrier. The 

vehicle was contained on the traffic side of 

the barrier and was brought to a controlled 

stop 42.8 ft. (13.0 m) longitudinally 

(downstream) and 16.7 ft. (5.1 m) lateral 

(toward non traffic side) from the point of 

impact. The barrier had a maximum 

working width of 18.7 ft. (5.7 m) and a 

maximum dynamic deflection of 17.1 ft. (5.2 

m). 

The vehicle remained upright throughout 

the impact event. The test vehicle's 

occupant compartment was not penetrated 

and there was no measureable in cab 

deformation. The maximum roll and pitch 

angle did not exceed 75° and occupant risk 

values were within limits per MASH 

specifications for Occupant impact Velocity 

(OIV) and Ridedown Acceleration (RA) 

PASS 

1-20 (11 OOC) Test for transition is not applicable for the 

MASH TrafFix Water Wall TL-1. Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

1-21 (2270P) Test for transition is not applicable for the 

MASH TrafFix Water Wall TL-1. Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test 

laboratory (cite the laboratory' s accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports.): 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 5 of 5 

Laboratory Name: KARCO Engineering, INC

Digitally signed by Balbi no A. Beltran 


ON: m =Balbfno A. Beltran, o=KARCO Engineering, LLC., ou,
 Laboratory Signature: email=abeltran@ka rco.com, c=US Balbino A. Beltran Date: 2016.09.23 18:28:22 -07'00' 

Address: 9270 Holly Road, Adelanto CA 92301 Same as Submitter D 

Country: United States Same as Submitter D 

Accreditation Certificate 

Number and Dates of current 

Accreditation period : 

TL-371 ; December 18, 2015 through December 18, 2017 

O.gitallysignedbyFelipeAlm.Jnza 

Submitter Si nature*: t;;,f,',., /JJ!~ :::~~:re;,,.~m~"· ""'"""°"""' g '.JV<AfJO V'N''''7' - emait=falm.1nz.1@1traff1xdeY1Ceuom, c=US 

Date:2016.09.2011:17:17-07'00' 

Submit Form 

ATTACHMENTS 

Attach to this form: 

I) Additional disclosures of related financial interest as indicated above. 

2) A copy of the full test report, video, and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in 

support of this request. 

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications 

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards]. For proprietary products, a single isometric line drawing is 

usually acceptable to illustrate the product, with detailed specifications, intended use, and contact 

information provided on the reverse. Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that 

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted 

to faci litate our review. 

FHWA Official Business Only: 

Eligibility Letter 

Number Date Key Words 
SECTION 4 


MASH TEST 1-10 SUMMARY 

Test Article: TrafFix Devices Water Cable Barrier Project No. P36145-01 

Test Program: MASH 1-10 Test Date: 05/20/16 

SEQUENTIAL PHOTOGRAPHS 

' 

0.000 s 0.100 s 	 0.700 s 1.200 s 3.000 s

PLAN VIEW 

-90 ft -75 ft -60 ft -45 ft -30 ft -15 ft 0 ft 15 ft 30 ft 45 ft 60 ft 75 ft 90 ft 105 ft 

(! !I ....lt u 11 n 

Pre-Test 

Arti IP. 

•	 Vohid o 

Pci;t·Test 

• A.r1i: le 

~ 

---ir-ir==i:i~ 

Dlo"Mli: Defl.K"lilan 

6., Pi. 

Vo~nD V1dUt 

e.' Pi. 

8 	 TR-P36145-01-NC 

SECTION 4 ... (CONTINUED) 

MASH TEST 1-10 SUMMARY 

Test Article: TrafFix Devices Water Cable Barrier Project No. P36145-01 

Test Program: MASH 1-10 Test Date: 05/20/16 

GENERAL INFORMATION EXIT CONDITIONS 

TEST AGENCY KARCO Engineering, LLC. EXIT VELOCITY N/A 

TEST NUMBER P36145-01 EXIT ANGLE N/A 

TEST DESIGNATION 1-10 VEHICLE STABILITY Satisfactory 

TEST DATE 5/20/16 FINAL VEHICLE POSITION 46.3 ft. (14.1 m) downstream and 2.3 ft. (0.7 m) 

toward the non-traffic side 

TEST ARTICLE VEHICLE SNAGGING None 

NAME /MODEL Water Cable Barrier VEHICLE POCKETING None 

TYPE Longitudinal Barrier MAXIMUM ROLL ANGLE -8.5° 

KEY ELEMENTS Water Barrier, Internal Cables, Drop T-Pins 

MAXIMUM PITCH ANGLE 1.8° 

MAXIMUM YAW ANGLE -15.7° 

MODULE LENGTH 73.0 in. (1 ,854 mm) IMPACT SEVERITY 14.9 kip-ft (20.2 kJ) 

TOTAL INSTALLATION LENGTH 152.7 ft. (46.6 m) OCCUPANT RISK VALUES 

HEIGHT 32.0 in. (813 mm) OCCUPANT IMPACT 

VELOCITY 

Longitudinal 17.4 ft/s (5.3 m/s) 

MAXIMUM WIDTH 18.0 in. (457 mm) Lateral 6.6 ft/s (2.0 mis) 

ROAD SURFACE Concrete RIDE DOWN 

ACCELERATION 

Longitudinal -1 .9 g 

TEST VEHICLE Lateral -1.4 g 

TYPE I DESIGNATION 1100C THIV 18.0 ft/s (5.5 m/s) 

YEAR, MAKE AND MODEL 2013 Kia Rio PHO 2.0 g 

CURB MASS 2,588.1 lbs (1,174.0 kg) ASI 0.40 

TEST INERTIAL MASS 2,428.3 lbs (1 ,101 .5 kg) TEST ARTICLE DEFLECTIONS 

GROSS STATIC MASS 2,590.4 lbs (1 , 175.0 kg) WORKING WIDTH 8.9 ft. (2.7 m) 

IMPACT CONDITIONS DYNAMIC DEFLECTION 6.9 ft. (2.1 m) 

IMPACT VELOCITY 32.45 mph (52.22 km/h) ARTICLE DAMAGE Module 13 Ruptured, Cosmetic Damage to Module 

14 through 21 

IMPACT ANGLE 24.7° VEHICLE DAMAGE 

IMPACT LOCATION I ORIENTATION 3.5 ft . (1 .1 m) upstream from the joint connecting 

modules 13 and 14 

VEHICLE DAMAGE SCALE 1-FRQ-1 

COLLISION DAMAGE CLASSIFICATION 01FZEW1 

9 TR-P36145-01-NC 

SECTION 4 


MASH TEST 1-11 SUMMARY 

Test Article: TrafFix Devices Water Cable Barrier Project No. P36064-01 

Test Program: MASH 1-11 Test Date: 03/14/16 

SEQUENTIAL PHOTOGRAPHS 


0.000 s 0.100 s 0.400 s 1.000 s 3.000 s 

PLAN VIEW 

-90 ft -75 ft -60 ft -45 ft -30 ft -15 ft 0 ft 15 ft 30 ft 45 ft 60 ft 75 ft 90 ft 105 ft 120 ft 135 ft 150 ft 165 ft 

•----=:i::=! 2 I I I I i f f ' I~ _____ J..:_ -- ~:-_::: 3 =---=:C _ _ ' ' c==i-y...;: 

~~ Vl:lr*'1o "1ctth 

18.7 <'t 

ll~onk:: De .Jt.~ n 

171 Ft. 

II 

II 

Pre-Test 

e Article 

•Vehicle 

Post-Test 

• Article 

• Vehicle 

11 Debris 

8 TR-P36064-01-NC 

SECTION 4 ... (CONTINUED) 

MASH TEST 1-11 SUMMARY 

Test Article: TrafFix Devices Water Cable Barrier Project No. P36064-01 

Test Program: MASH 1-11 Test Date: 03/14/16 

GENERAL INFORMATION EXIT CONDITIONS 

TEST AGENCY KARCO Engineering, LLC. EXIT VELOCITY N/A 

TEST NUMBER P36064-01 EXIT ANGLE N/A 

TEST DESIGNATION 1-11 VEHICLE STABILITY Satisfactory 

TEST DATE 3/14/16 FINAL VEHICLE POSITION 42.8 ft. (13.0 m) downstream. 16.7 ft. (5.1 m) 

toward non-traffic side 

TEST ARTICLE VEHICLE SNAGGING None 

NAME /MODEL Water Cable Barrier VEHICLE POCKETING Yes 

TYPE Longitudinal Barrier MAXIMUM ROLL ANGLE -4.5° 

KEY ELEMENTS Water Barrier, Internal Cables, Drop Pins 

MAXIMUM PITCH ANGLE 9.3° 

MAXIMUM YAW ANGLE 6.1° 

MODULE LENGTH 73.0 in. (1854 mm) IMPACT SEVERITY 29.0 kip-ft (39.3 kJ) 

TOTAL INSTALLATION LENGTH 151 .9 ft. (46.3 m) OCCUPANT RISK VALUES 

HEIGHT 32.0 in. (813 mm) OCCUPANT IMPACT 

VELOCITY 

Longitudinal 10.8 ft/s (3.3 m/s) 

MAXIMUM WIDTH 18.0 in. (457 mm) Lateral 5.2 ft/s (1 .6 mis) 

ROAD SURFACE Concrete RIDE DOWN 

ACCELERATION 

Longitudinal -3.9 g 

TEST VEHICLE Lateral -2.2 g 

TYPE I DESIGNATION 2270P THIV 13.1 ft/s (4.0 mis) 

YEAR, MAKE AND MODEL 2012 RAM 1500 PHO 4.5 g 

CURB MASS 5,038.5 lbs (2,285.5 kg) ASI 0.33 

TEST INERTIAL MASS 5,021 .0 lbs (2,277.5 kg) TEST ARTICLE DEFLECTIONS 

GROSS STATIC MASS 5,021 .0 lbs (2,277.5 kg) WORKING WIDTH 18.7 ft (5.7 m) 

IMPACT CONDITIONS DYNAMIC DEFLECTION 17.1 ft. (5.2 m) 

IMPACT VELOCITY 31.21 mph (50.23 km/h) ARTICLE DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage to modules 13 through 17 

IMPACT ANGLE (°) 24.9 VEHICLE DAMAGE 

IMPACT LOCATION I ORIENTATION 2.7 ft. (0.8 m) upstream from the joint connecting 

modules 13 and 14 

VEHICLE DAMAGE SCALE 1-FR-1 

COLLISION DAMAGE CLASSIFICATION 01FRLW1 

9 TR-P36064-01-NC 

c 

3 2 

A --: I 

I 

D 

I 

I 

I 

WATER FILLED MODULE WITH INTERNAL CABLES A ___. I 

D 

SECTION A-A 

THREE INTERNALLY MOLDED IN CABLES Traffix Water Cable Barrier 

PER WATER FILLED BARRIER MODULE 

UNLESS OTHERWISE SPEClflEO: All DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESlmm ). 

TOLERANC ES: 160 Avenida La Para 

FRACTIONAL: X/X ! 1/ 16 [l.6mm] TrafFix .,,,, San Clemente, CA 92673 

OECIMAL:X.X ! .0625" 

x.xx ! .037 Devices Inc. l:lr;r, ~(~~-5f;;?.9205 X.XXX ! .015" www.rrarJxdeviettS.com DEGREES:! 0.5 ' 

A TITLTrafFix Water Cable Barrier A 

Array With Internal 

Molded in Cables 

SIZE DWG. NO. REV DRAWN BY: DATE: Ben Longden 3/7/16 

CHECKED BY: DATE: B 300-235 B FA 3/7/16 DETAIL B APPROVED BY: DATE: FA 3/7/16 SHEET I OF l 

8 3 

c 
8 

Traffix Water Cable Barrier 

32.00 

[812.80 ] 

I llj.UU 

D D

73.00 


[ 1854.20 ] 


Pin to Pin 

c 77.50 c 

[ 1968.50 l 

STEEL DROP 

T·PIN 

EQUIPMENT LIFTING BUTTRESS THREAD UNLESS OTHERW ISE SPECIFIED: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES[mm). 

TOLERANCES: »: 160 Avenida La Para THROUGH HOLES DRAIN PLUG FRACTIONAL: X}X ! 1/16' (l.6mm] TrafFix San Clemente. CA 92673 

OECIMAl:X.X ! .0625" ,.__• • (949) 361·5663 x.xx ! .032" &n:YICeS •nc. FAX(949)361,9205 x.xxx ! .015" www.traffiJ<dev1r.."8S.com DEGREES:! o.s · 

TITLE: 

A TrafFix Water Cable Barrier A

With Internal 

Molded in Cables 

Traffix Water Cable Barrier TL-1 & TL-2 SIZE DWG. NO. REV DRAWN BY: DATE: Ben Loogdon 3/7/16 

CHECKED BY: DATE: Color: Orange and White B 300-236 B Material FA 3/7/l6 : Plastic Polyethlene APPROVED BY· DATE: FA 3/ 7/) 6 SHEET I OF I 

8 3 
8 

D D 

c c 

MODULES 


PINNED TOGETHER 


DETAIL C 

UNLESS OTHERW ISE SPEClflEO: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES[mm]. 


TOLERANCES: 


FRACTIONAL: XIX ~ 1/16 (1.6mml 
 DECll'loAl: X.X ! .0625" 


X.XX : .032' 

x.xxx ! .015" 

DEGREES:! 0.5" 

A 

DRAWN BY: Sen Loogdon 

CHECKED BY: 

FA 

APPROVED BY : FA 

8 3 

DATE: 

3/7/16 

CATE: 

3/7/16 

DATE: 

3/7116 

Devices Inc. Yl 160 Avenida La Pata TrafFix San Clemente, CA 92673 

ff,m~r;;:,~9205 www.trordxdevices.t..--om 

mLTrafFix Water Cable Barrier A 

Array With Internal 

Molded in Cables 

SIZE OWG. NO. REV 

B 300-237 A SHEET 2 OF 2 
8 

D D

c c 

MODULES 


PINNED TOGETHER 


A 

DETAIL C 

UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: 
 All DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES[mm]. 
 160 Avenida La Para 

FRACTIONAL: XjX ! 1/16 p.6mmj TrafFix Sa" Clemente. CA 92673 

DECloV.Al:X.X ! .0625" 

TOLERANCES: 

X.XX!.032' Devices Inc. 1:1® W1~J·5ft,~920s x.xxx ! .015" www.traWi)(devices.com DEGREES:! o.s· 

TITLTrafFix Water Cable Barrier A 

Array With Internal 

Molded in Cables 

DRAWN SY: 

Ben Langdon 

CHECKED BY: 

DATE: 

3/7/16 

DATE: 

SIZE 

B 

DWG. NO. 

300-237 

REV 

A FA 3/7/16 

APPROVED BY: FA 

DATE: 

3/7/16 SHEET 2 OF 2 

8 3