; .··· ' 

_)f Tr 1nspu tut ,r 

federal Highway 

Administration 

1200 New Jersey Ave .. SE

Washington, D.C. 20590 

March 8, 2018 In Reply Refer To: 

HSST-1/CC-139 

Mr. Felipe Almanza 

Traffix Devices Inc. 

160 A venida La Pata 

San Clemente, CA 92672 

Dear Mr. Almanza: 

This letter is in response to your September 14, 2017 request for the Federal Highway 

Administration (FHW A) to review a roadside safety device, hardware, or system for eligibility 

for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program. This FHWA letter of eligibility is 

assigned FHW A control number CC-139 and is valid until a subsequent letter is issued by 

FHW A that expressly references this device. 

Decision 

The following device is eligible within the length-of-need, with details provided in the form 

which is attached as an integral part of this letter: 

• Big Sandy MASH 

Scope of this Letter 

To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding, new roadside safety devices should meet the crash 

test and evaluation criteria contained in the American Association of State Highway and 

Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). 

However, the FHWA, the Department of Transportation, and the United States Government do 

not regulate the manufacture of roadside safety devices. Eligibility for reimbursement under the 

Federal-aid highway program does not establish approval, certification or endorsement of the 

device for any particular purpose or use. 

This letter is not a determination by the FHW A, the Department ofTransportation, or the United 

States Government that a vehicle crash involving the device will result in any particular 

outcome, nor is it a guarantee of the in-service performance of this device. Proper 

manufacturing, installation, and maintenance are required in order for this device to function as 

tested. 

This finding of eligibility is limited to the crashworthiness of the system and does not cover other 

structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 
2 

Eligibility for Reimbursement 

Based solely on a review of crash test results and certifications submitted by the manufacturer, 

and the crash test laboratory, FHWA agrees that the device described herein meets the crash test 

and evaluation criteria of the AASHTO' s MASH. Therefore, the device is eligible for 

reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program if installed under the range oftested 

conditions. 

Name of system: Big Sandy MASH 

Type of system: Crash Cushion 

Test Level: MASH Test Level 3 (TL3) 

Testing conducted by: KARCO 

Date of request: September 14, 2017 

Date initially acknowledged: September 20, 2017 

FHW A concurs with the recommendation of the accredited crash testing laboratory on the 

attached form. 

Full Description of the Eligible Device 

The device and supporting documentation, including reports of the crash tests or other testing 

done, videos of any crash testing, and/or drawings of the device, are described in the attached 

form. 

Notice 

This eligibility letter is issued for the subject device as tested. Modifications made to the device 

are not covered by this letter and will need to be tested in accordance with all recommended tests 

in AASHTO' s MASH as part of a new and separate submittal. 

You are expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design, installation and 

maintenance requirements to ensure proper performance. 

You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the same chemistry, 

mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for review, and that it will meet the test 

and evaluation criteria of AASHTO' s MASH. 

Issuance of this letter does not convey property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege. This 

letter is based on the premise that information and reports submitted by you are accurate and 

correct. We reserve the right to modify or revoke this letter if: (1) there are any inaccuracies in 

the information submitted in support of your request for this letter, (2) the qualification testing 

was flawed, (3) in-service performance or other information reveals safety problems, (4) the 

system is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, or (5) any other 

information indicates that the letter was issued in error or otherwise does not reflect full and 

complete information about the crash worthiness of the system. 
3 

Standard Provisions 

• To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of eligibility designated as FHW A 

control number CC-139 shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test 

documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and 

documentation may be reviewed upon request. 

• This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHW A to use, 

manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder. 

• Ifthe subject device is a patented product it may be considered to be proprietary. If 

proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects: 

(a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented 

items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization 

with the existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists; or ( c) 

they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short 

sections of road for experimental purposes. Our regulations concerning proprietary 

products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411. 

Sincerely, 

Michael S. Griffith 

Director, Office of Safety Technologies 

Office of Safety 

Enclosures 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 1 of 9 

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility 

of Highway Safety Hardware 

.. 

.

.... 

Q)

E 

.D 

:, 

II) 

Date of Request: March 01, 2018 (e New r Resubmission I 

Name: Felipe Almanza 

Company: 

Address :

TrafFix Devices Inc. 

160 Avenida La Pata San Clemente California 92672 

Country: United States 

To: Michael S. Griffith, Director 

FHWA, Office of Safety Technologies 

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid 

highway program. 

Device & Testing Criterion - Enter from right to left starting with Test Level Fl 

System Type Submission Type Device Name/ Variant Testing Criterion Test 

Level 

'CC': Crash Cushions, 

Attenuators, & Terminals 

(e Physical Crash Testing 

(' Engineering Analysis Big Sandy MASH 

AASHTO MASH TL3 

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration, I certify 

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety 

Hardware and that the evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH . 

Individual or Organization responsible for the product: 

Contact Name: Felipe Almanza Same as Submitter IZJ 

Company Name: TrafFix Devices Inc. Same as Submitter IZJ 

Address: 160 Avenida La Pata San Clemente California 92672 Same as Submitter IZJ 

Country: United States Same as Submitter IZJ 

Enter below all disclosures of financial interests as required by the FHWA ' Federal-Aid Reimbursement 

Eligibility Process for Safety Hardware Devices' document. 

TrafFix Devices Inc. and Karco Engineering LLC share no financial interests between the two organizations. This 

includes no shared financial interest but not limited to: 

i. Compensation including wages, salaries, commissions, professional fees, or fees for business referrals 

iii. Research funding or other forms of research support; 

iv. Patents, copyrights, licenses, and other intellectual property interests; 

vi. Business ownership and investment interests; 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 2 of 9 

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 

(e New Hardware or (' Modification to 

Significant Modification Existing Hardware 

The Big Sandy Inertial Crash Cushion System is a non-redirective, gating crash cushion, designed to shield the 

end of rig id objects in both temporary and/or permanent roadside installations. The Big Sandy consists of an 

array of individual free-standing plastic sand filled barrels in consecutive rows which contain gradually 

increasing weights of sand within the array. The Big Sandy Barrels are not anchored to the road surface and do 

not require a transition to the barrier it is shielding. The Big Sandy can be used on concrete, asphalt, gravel, 

compacted dirt, and inertial (barrel/module) pallets. The test series was conducted shielding freestanding 

barrier and fixed anchored barrier on a concrete surface. 

The Big Sandy barrels come in three configurations 2100 lb. (960 kg) barrels with an overall height of 52.5 in. 

(1333.5mm), 1400 lb. (640 kg) barrels with an overall height of 40.75 in. (1035mm), and a two-piece combo 

barrel consisting of a pedestal base, and an upper canister. When assembled, the hour glass shaped combo 

barrel has a height of 40.3 in. (1024mm). Combo barrels have three molded in marks designating three weight 

demarcation fill levels. The bottom mark designates a fill level of 200 lbs. (90kg) of sand. The middle mark 

designates 400 lbs. (180kg) of sand. The top mark designates 700 lbs. (320 kg) of sand. All Big Sandy barrels 

utilize the same 37 in (940 mm) diameter snap on lid. 

The Big Sandy Barrel is manufactured from frangible plastic that is designed to break up into fragments upon 

impact thereby dispersing the sand contained within each barrel. As the vehicle intrudes into the array a series 

of collisions occur between the impacting vehicle and the consecutive rows of barrels which contain gradually 

increasing weights of sand. Each collision gradually reduces the velocity of the impacting vehicle until it is 

brought to a controlled stop. Due to the nature of the frangible plastic material used in the Big Sandy Barrels, it 

is not recommended that frangible barrels be intermixed with non-frangible barrels within an array. 

The Big Sandy barrels used for TL-3 MASH testing are identical and unchanged from the Big Sandy barrels that 

have passed NCH RP Report 350 testing (Reference Letter HNG-14 and CC-52A-C). The Big Sandy ICS 12 barrel 

array used for TL-3 MASH testing is identical to the Big Sandy 12 barrel array that passed NCH RP Report 350 

testing. Because the barrels and arrays are the same, Big Sandy barrels and arrays produced since 1998 are 

now MASH compliant and interchangeable. 

CRASH TESTING 

By signature below, the Engineer affiliated with the testing laboratory, agrees in support of this submission that 

all of the critical and relevant crash tests for this device listed above were conducted to meet the MASH test 

criteria. The Engineer has determined that no other crash tests are necessary to determine the device meets 

the MASH criteria. 

Engineer Name : Robert Ramirez 

Digitally signed by Robert Ramirez 

DN: cn=Robert Ramirez, o=KARCO Engineering, ou=Project Engineer. Engineer Signature: Robert Ramirez email=rramirez@karco.com, c=US 

Date: 2018.03.01 17:17:35--08'00' 

Address: Same as Submitter D 

Country: Same as Submitter D 

A brief description ot each crash test and its result: 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description 

Evaluation 

Results 

3-30 (1 lO0C) Not applicable for non-redirective crash 

cushion Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

3-31 (2270P) Not applicable for non-redirective crash 

cushion Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 3 of 9 

Required Test 

Number 

Narrative 

Description 

Evaluation 

Results 

3-32 (11 00C) Not applicable for non-redirective crash 

cushion Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

3-33 (2270P) Not applicable for non-redirective crash 

cushion Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

3-34 (11 00C) Not applicable for non-redirective crash 

cushion Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

3-35 (2270P) Not applicable for non-redirective crash 

cushion Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

3-36 (2270P) Not applicable for non-redirective crash 

cushion Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

3-37 (2270P) Not applicable for non-redirective crash 

cushion Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

3-38 (1500A) Not applicable for non-redirective crash 

cushion Non-Relevant Test, not conducted 

3-40 (11 00C) 

The Big Sandy Array was positioned offset a 

quarter of the vehicle's width toward the 

passenger side. The offset position 

examines the risk of exceeding occupant 

risk values, vehicle instability, and vehicle 

yaw movement. The test was conducted 

using a commercially available 2013 Kia Rio 

4-door sedan with a test inertial mass of 

2464.7 lbs (1118.0 kg). The vehicle was in 

good condition, was free of major body 

damage, and was not missing any structural 

components. The bumpers were standard 

equipment and were not modified for this 

test. Based on CarFax reporting there was 

no recorded history of major accidents, was 

not a salvage titled vehicle, not involved in 

flooding, or fire. The test vehicle impacted 

the front 200 lb (90 kg) combo barrel in the 

array at a velocity of 63.11 mph (101.57 km/ 

hr) and at an impact angle of 0.5° resulting 

in the barrel fracturing into pieces and 

dispersing the contained sand. As the test 

vehicle intruded further into the array the 

sand barrels that came into contact with the 

vehicle fractured into pieces and dispersed 

the contained sand. The vehicle rotated 

about its yaw axis before coming to a 

controlled stop 66.3 ft (20.2 m) forward and 

55.3 ft (16.9 m) to the left of the initial 

impact point. The vehicle remained upright 

throughout the impact event. The test 

vehicle's occupant compartment was not 

penetrated and measurable in cab 

deformation was deemed acceptable. The 

maximum roll and pitch angle did not 

exceed 75° and occupant risk values were 

within limits per MASH specifications for 

Occupant Impact Velocity (OIV) and 

Ridedown Acceleration (RA). 

PASS 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 4 of 9 

3-41 (2270P) 

The Big Sandy Array was positioned inline 

with the center of the test vehicle. The inline 

centered position examines the risk of 

exceeding occupant risk values, vehicle 

instability, the system's capacity to absorb 

sufficient impact energy and the Big Sandy's 

ability to bring the vehicle to a safe 

controlled stop. The test was conducted 

using a commercially available 2012 Dodge 

Ram 4-door pickup truck with a test inertial 

mass of 5015.4 lbs (2275.0 kg). The vehicle 

was in good condition, was free of major 

body damage, and was not missing any 

structural components. The bumpers were 

standard equipment and were not modified 

for this test. Based on CarFax reporting 

there was no recorded history of major 

accidents, was not a salvage titled vehicle, 

not involved in flooding, or fire. 

The test vehicle impacted the front 200 lbs 

(90 kg) combo barrel in the array at a 

velocity of 62.96 mph (101.32 km/ hr) and at 

an impact angle of 0.1 ° resulting in the 

barrel fracturing into pieces and dispersing 

the contained sand. As the test vehicle 

intruded further into the array the sand 

barrels that came into contact with the 

vehicle fractured into pieces and dispersed 

the contained sand . The vehicle came to a 

controlled stop 28.1 ft (8.6 m) forward and 

10.3 in (261 mm) to the left of the initial 

impact. The vehicle remained upright 

throughout the impact event. The test 

vehicle's occupant compartment was not 

penetrated and there was no measurable in 

cab deformation beyond the allowed limit 

defined in MASH. The maximum roll and 

pitch angle did not exceed 75° and 

occupant risk values are within limits per 

MASH specifications for Occupant Impact 

Velocity and Ridedown Acceleration. 

PASS 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 5 of 9 

The Big Sandy Array was positioned at a 

nominal angle of 5° with the center of the 

test vehicle. The angle position examines 

the risk of exceeding occupant risk values, 

vehicle instability, capacity to absorb 

sufficient impact energy, and the Big 

Sandy's ability to bring the vehicle to a safe 

controlled stop. The test was conducted 

using a commercially available 2011 Kia Rio 

4-door sedan with a test inertial mass of 

2401 .9 lbs (1089.5 kg). The vehicle was in 

good condition, was free of major body 

damage, and was not missing any structural 

components. The bumpers were standard 

equipment and were not modified for this 

test. Based on CarFax reporting there was 

no recorded history of major accidents, was 

not a salvage titled vehicle, not involved in 

flooding, or fire. The test vehicle impacted 

the front 200 lb (90 kg) combo barrel in the 3-42 (1100() array at a velocity of 66.58 mph (107.15 km/ 

hr) and at an impact angle of 5.2° resulting 

in the barrel fracturing into pieces and 

dispersing the contained sand. As the test 

vehicle intruded further into the array the 

sand barrels that came into contact with the 

vehicle fractured into pieces and dispersed 

the contained sand. The vehicle rotated 

about its yaw axis before coming to a 

controlled stop 48.8 ft (14.9 m) forward and 

3.6 ft (1 .1 m) to the left of the initial impact. 

The vehicle remained upright throughout 

the impact event. The test vehicle's 

occupant compartment was not penetrated 

and measurable in cab deformation was 

deemed acceptable. The maximum roll and 

pitch angle did not exceed 75°. Occupant 

risk values are within limits per MASH 

specifications for Occupant Impact Velocity 

and Ridedown Acceleration. 

PASS 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 6 of 9 

3-43 (2270P) 

The Big Sandy Array was positioned at a 

nominal angle of 5° with the center of the 

test vehicle. The angle position examines 

the risk of exceeding occupant risk values, 

vehicle instability, capacity to absorb 

sufficient impact energy, and the Big 

Sandy's ability to bring the vehicle to a safe 

controlled stop. The test was conducted 

using a commercially available 2012 Dodge 

Ram 4-door pickup truck with a test inertial 

mass of 4968.0 lbs (2253.5 kg). The vehicle 

was in good condition, was free of major 

body damage, and was not missing any 

structural components. The bumpers were 

standard equipment and were not modified 

for this test. Based on CarFax reporting 

there was no recorded history of major 

accidents, was not a salvage titled vehicle, 

not involved in flooding, or fire. The test 

vehicle impacted the front 200 lb (90 kg) 

combo barrel in the array at a velocity of 

62.09 mph (99.92 km/hr) and at an impact 

angle of 5.6 ° resulting in the barrel 

fracturing into pieces and dispersing the 

contained sand . As the test vehicle 

intruded further into the array the sand 

barrels that came into contact with the 

vehicle fractured into pieces and dispersed 

the contained sand. The vehicle rotated 

about its yaw axis before coming to a 

controlled stop 128.9 ft (39.3 m) forward 

and 10.1 ft (3.1 m) to the left of the initial 

impact. The vehicle remained upright 

throughout the impact event. The test 

vehicle's occupant compartment was not 

penetrated and there were no measurable 

in cab deformation beyond the allowed 

limit defined in MASH. The maximum roll 

and pitch angle did not exceed 75°. 

Occupant risk values are within limits per 

MASH specifications for Occupant Impact 

Velocity and Ridedown Acceleration. 

PASS 
Version 10.0 {05/16) 

Page 7 of 9 

3-44 (2270P) 

The Big Sandy Array was positioned at a 

nominal angle of 20° and the center line of 

the impacting vehicle was directed at the 

corner of the barrier. The vehicle impacted 

the crash cushion 14.63 ft (4.4 m) from the 

barrier and 2.44 ft (0.743 m) from the center 

line of the vehicle. Two 3-44 tests were run. 

One conducted with freestanding barrier 

and one with permanently anchored barrier 

For the test with freestanding barrier 

(Report TR-P36301) a 2012 Ram 4-door truck 

was used with an inertial mass of 5004.4 lbs 

(2270.0 kg), at an impact velocity of 60.32 

mph (97.07 km/hr), and at an impact angle 

of 20.2 °. The vehicle rotated in a clockwise 

direction about the vertical axis and came 

to a controlled stop 26.7 ft (8.1 m) forward 

and 2.4 in (61 mm) from the impact point. 

For the test with anchored barrier (Report 

TR-38019) a 2013 Ram 4-door truck was 

used with an inertial mass of 4995.6 lbs 

(2266.0 kg), at an impact velocity of 61 .26 

mph (98.59 km/hr), and at an impact angle 

of 19.9 °. The vehicle rotated in a clockwise 

direction about the vertical axis and came 

to a controlled stop 18.2 ft (5.6 m) forward 

and 6.2 ft (1.9 m) from the impact point. 

For both 3-44 tests the truck contacted the 

first double row of 700 lbs (320 kg) barrels 

approx. 13.5 ft (4.1 m) from the front of the 

Big Sandy System. The first impacted 

barrels fractured dispersing the contained 

sand. As the vehicle intruded further into 

the array all the barrels rearward fractured 

and dispersed the contained sand. 

The CIP was defined in specifications in 

MASH for test procedures for Gating NonRedirective Crash Cushions. The trucks 

were free of major body damage and based 

on CarFax there was no recorded history of 

major accidents. For both tests the truck 

remained upright, and did not exhibit 

vaulting. The maximum roll and pitch angle 

did not exceed 75°. The occupant 

compartments were not penetrated and 

there were no measurable in cab 

deformation beyond the allowed limit 

defined in MASH. 

PASS 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 8 of 9 

3-45 (1500A) 

The Big Sandy Array was positioned inline 

the with center of the test vehicle. The in line 

centered position examines the risk of 

exceeding occupant risk values, vehicle 

instability, capacity to absorb sufficient 

impact energy, and the Big Sandy's ability 

to bring the vehicle to a safe controlled 

stop. The test was conducted using a 

commercially available 2012 Chevy Malibu 

4-door sedan with a test inertial mass of 

3284.8 lbs (1490.0 kg). The vehicle was in 

good condition, was free of major body 

damage, and was not missing any structural 

components. The bumpers were standard 

equipment and were not modified for this 

test. Based on CarFax reporting there was 

no recorded history of major accidents, was 

not a salvage titled vehicle, not involved in 

flooding, or fire. The test vehicle impacted 

the front 200 lb (90 kg) combo barrel in the 

array at a velocity of 61.31 mph (98.67 km/ 

hr) and at an impact angle of 0.6° resulting 

in the barrel fracturing into pieces 

dispersing the contained sand. As the test 

vehicle intruded further into the array the 

sand barrels that came into contact with the 

vehicle fractured into pieces and dispersed 

the contained sand. The vehicle came to a 

controlled stop 27.7 ft (8.4 m) forward from 

the initial impact. The vehicle remained 

upright throughout the impact event. The 

test vehicle's occupant compartment was 

not penetrated and there was no 

measurable in cab deformation beyond the 

allowed limit defined in MASH. The 

maximum roll and pitch angle did not 

exceed 75° and occupant risk values are 

within limits per MASH specifications for 

Occupant Impact Velocity and Ridedown 

Acceleration. 

PASS 

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test 

laboratory (cite the laboratory's accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports.): 

Laboratory Name: KARCO Engineering 

Laboratory Signature: Alex Beltran Digitally signed by Alex Beltran 

DN: cn =Alex Beltran, o=KARCO En gineering, ou =Testing Lab oratory, 

ema il=abeltran@karco.com, c=US 

Date: 2018.03.01 16:53 :12 -08'00' 

Address: 9270 Holly Rd. Adelanto CA 92301 Same as Submitter D 

Country: United States Same as Submitter D 

Accreditation Certificate 

Number and Dates of current 

Accreditation period : 

October 12, 2017 - July 1, 2018 
Version 10.0 (05/16) 

Page 9 of 9 

Submitter Signature*: 

Submit Form 

ATTACHMENTS 

Attach to this form: 

I) Additional disclosures of related financial interest as indicated above. 

2) A copy of the full test report, video, and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in 

support of this request. 

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications 

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards]. For proprietary products, a single isometric line drawing is 

usually acceptable to illustrate the product, with detailed specifications, intended use, and contact 

information provided on the reverse. Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that 

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted 

to facilitate our review. 

FHWA Official Business Only: 

Eligibility Letter 

Number Date Key Words 
MASH Test 3-40 Summary 

0.000 s 0.100 s 0.300 s 0.500 s 0.900 s 

1-: I 

I

,Iri 

: ' h.;f r -,-; •-.._,_ 

-l~ - -: lr- t t , Le •· ··d 

-'-· T7=3 •·; "-) g .. __t_ - -·-r;:r: -=--'-' 

General Information Impact Conditions Occupant Risk 

Test Agency ........ . KARCO Engineering, LLC. Impact Velocity ... ...... .. ... .. 63.11 mph (1 01 .57 km/h) Longitudinal OIV .... ........... 23.6 ft/s (7.2 mis) 

KARCO Test No .. .. . P37027-01 Impact Angle........ . .... 05° Lateral OIV .. ... ... ... . 0.3 ft/s (0.1 m/s) 

Test Designation .. .. 3-40 Location/ Orientation ... Offset 16.9 in (430 mm) towards Longitudinal RA. .. . ..... -13.3 g 

Test Date ..... 03/06/17 the passenger side Lateral RA ................. ..... 3.5 g 

Kinetic Energy ...... ..... .... ... 328.2 kip-ft (444.9 kJ ) THIV .. ....... .... ... .. .. . 23.6 ft/s (7.2 m/s) 

Test Article PHO ............. 13.3 

Name I Model . . . . . . . . . . . Big Sandy Exit Conditions ASI. ................ .. .... 0.68 

Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Crash Cushion Exit Velocity... ... .. . .... N/A 

Article Length ... ... .. ........... 28.1 ft. (8.6 m) Exit Angle ............. .... ...... N/A Test Article Deflections 

Installation Length .. . 49.1 ft (15.0 m) Final Vehicle Position ... .. .. .. 66.3 ft (20.2 m) downstream Static ..... .. ............ N/A 

Road Surface........ .... Concrete 55.3 ft. (16 9 m) left Maximum Debris Field 33.7 ft. (10.3 m) left

Vehicle Snagging ... ... ... ... .. None 110.8 ft. (33.8 m) 

Test Vehicle Vehicle Pocketing ... ... ... ... ... None forward

Type I Designation ....... 1100C Vehicle Stability ... ...... ... ... .. Satisfactory Vehicle Damage 

Year, Make, and Model ....... 2013 Kia Rio Maximum Roll Angle .......... . 3.7° Vehicle Damage Scale ..... .. . 12-FC-4 

Curb Mass ..................... .. 2,538.6 lbs (1 ,151 .5 kg) Maximum Pitch Angle ......... . 3.6° CDC ....... ..... .. ... ... 12FDEW3 

Test Inertial Mass... .. 2,464.7 lbs (1 ,118.0 kg) Maximum Yaw AQgle ...... ... .. 107.8° Maximum Intrusion .. .... ... .... Windshield 

Gross Static Mass ... .......... 2,638.9 lbs (1,197.0 kg) 

Figure 2 Summary of Test 3-40 

14 TR-P37027-01 -NC 
MASH Test 3-41 Summary 

0.000 s 0.200 s 0.400 s 0.600 s 

cl• [261ml 

r I: cfr ~-E====JE====l

General Information 

Test Agency... ... ... . KARCO Engineering, LLC. 

KAR CO Test No... P37007-01 

Test Designation .... .. ........ 3-41 

Test Date. .. .. ... ... ... ........ 2/27117 

Test Article 

Name I Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Big Sandy 

Type ... .. ..... .. .. Crash Cushion 

Article Length .......... .. .. .. .. 28.1 ft (8.6 m) 

Installation Length ... . ..... 49.1 ft (1 5.0 m) 

Road Surface ..... . Cement 

Test Vehicle 

Type I Designation ... ... ....... 2270P 

Year, Make, and Model. ... 2012 RAM 1500 

Curb Mass ..... 5,028.7 lbs (2,281 .0 kg) 

Test Inertial Mass .............. 5,015.4 lbs (2,275.0 kg) 

Gross Static Mass ........... .. 5,015.4 lbs (2,27_5,0 _l<_g) 

Figure 2 Summary of Test 3-41 

Impact Conditions 

Impact Velocity ........ ......... 62.96 mph (101 .32 km/h) 

Impact Angle.. . . 0.1 ° 

Location I Orientation ... .... ... 0.5 in (13 mm) right of the 

article's centerline 

Kinetic Energy ........ .. ........ 664.8 kip-ft (901 .3 kJ) 

Exit Conditions 

Exit Velocity.......... . . .. NIA 

Exit Angle......... . .. NIA 

Final Vehicle Position .. . 28.1 ft (8.6 m) downstream 

10.3 in. (261 mm) left 

Vehicle Snagging ... .. ... ... .. None 

Vehicle Pocketing ............... None 

Vehicle Stability ................ Satisfactory 

Maximum Roll Angle ... ........ 4.7° 

Maximum Pitch Angle ......... . 6.7° 

Maximum Yaw Angle ........... -4.5° 

1.100 s 

Occupant Risk 

Longitudinal OIV. .. ...... ... .... 26.9 ft/s (8.2 mis) 

Lateral OIV ...... ... ... .. .. .. ... .. 4.6 ft/s (1 .4 mis) 

Longitudinal RA ..... .. .. ....... -12.4 g 

Lateral RA ....... 2.2 g 

TH IV. .. ......... .... ..... ... ... .. .. 27.2 ft/s (8.3 mis) 

PHO....... ......... 12.5 g 

ASI ...... ........ ... .. Q~ 

Test Article Deflections 

Static .... . .. .............. . NIA 

Maximum Debris Field ... 65.5 ft. (20.0 m) left 

101 .9 ft. (31 .0 m) forward 

Vehicle Damage 

Vehicle Damage Scale ........ 12-FC-4 

CDC ......... 12FDEW3 

Maximum Intrusion ...... Floorpan 

13 TR-P37007-01-NC 
MASH Test 3-42 Summary 

MXW&#i..t iii&El 

0.000 s 0.160 s 0.320 s 0.640 s 0.880 s

1--------------e•-9b• c1e6e""i-- ---------1⁄2'r----i 

General Information 

Test Agency .. KARCO Engineering, LLC. 

KARCO Test No... P37115-01 

Test Designation .. 3-42 

Test Date .. 4/14/17 

Test Article 

Name/ Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Big Sandy 

Type ............. .. ..... Crash Cushion 

Article Length .............. ... .. 28.1 ft. (8.6 m) 

Installation Length ..... .... .. .. 59.1 ft (18.0 m) 

Road Surface .... . Concrete 

Test Vehicle 

Type I Designation.. .... .. 1100C 

Year, Make, and Model. ..... 201 1 Kia Rio 

Curb Mass. . . . . ... . . .... ... 2,307.1 lbs (1,046.5 kg) 

Test Inertial Mass. . . .... . 2,401 .9 lbs (1,089.5 kg) 

Gross Static Mass ........... .. 2,572.8 lbs (1,167.0 kg) 

Figure 2 Summary of Test 3-42 

Impact Conditions 

Impact Velocity.. . . ... 66.58 mph (1 07.15 km/h) 

Impact Angle ... .. . ....... ... 5.2° 

Location/ Orientation ......... 1.0 in (25 mm) right of the 

vehicles centerline 

Kinetic Energy 355.9 kip-ft (482.6 kJ) 

Exit Conditions 

Exit Velocity . N/A 

Exit Angle ... ... ................ . N/A 

Final Vehicle Position ........ 48.8 ft (14.9 m) downstream 

3.6 ft. (1.1 m) left 

Veh icle Snagging .... None 

Vehicle Pocketing. . ...... None 

Vehicle Stability..... ... Satisfactory 

Maximum Roll Angle ...... .... 5.0° 

Maximum Pitch Angle . -3.2° 

Maximum Yaw Angle .......... 28.8° 

Occupant Risk 

Longitudinal OIV. ...... ....... 23.6 ft/s (7.2 m/s) 

Lateral OIV... . . ...... 2.0 ft/s (0.6 m/s) 

Longitudinal RA .... .... .. ..... -14.5 g 

Lateral RA........ . . . . . . . . . . 2.8 g 

TH IV. . ...... ... ..... .. ....... .. .. 23.6 ft/s (7.2 m/s) 

PHO ..... ..... ... .. .... .... .. .... .. 14.5 

ASI. . ... ..... ... .... ......... .... .. 0.8 

Test Article Deflections 

Static...................... . N/A 

Maximum Debris Field ..... 54.6 ft. (16.6 m) left 

105.3 ft. (32.1 m) 

forward 

Vehicle Damage 

Vehicle Damage Scale ..... .. 12-FC-3 

CDC ........................ . 12FDEW2 

Maximum Intrusion .. . Windshield 

13 TR-P3711 5-01 -NC 
MASH Test 3-43 Summary 

0.000 s 0.050 s 0.100 s 0.200 s 0.350 s 

--------------------128 -10(?,• [J927bMM]---------

,I 

~.· _. .'\) • j

lQ' -1~' [ 3Q8QMM] :OL 

~=J.

General Information 

Test Agency... .. .. ...... KARCO Engineering, LLC. 

KARCO Test No.......... . ... P37168-01 

Test Designation .... ..... 3-43 

Test Date ... ... ... .. ...... 05/18/17 

Test Article 

Name/ Model .......... ...... Big Sandy 

Type... ............. ... ..... .. ... Crash Cushion 

Article Length .... ............. 28.1 ft. (8.6 m) 

Installation Length ....... .. .... 49.1 ft (15.0 m) 

Road Surface. ........ .. Concrete 

Test Vehicle 

Type/ Designation . .. ... 2270P 

Year, Make, and Model ....... 201 2 Ram 1500 

Curb Mass.... ... .5,007.7 lbs (2,271.5 kg) 

Test Inertial Mass... 4,968.0 lbs (2,253.5 kg) 

Gross Static Mass ............. 4,968.0 lbs (2,253.5 kg) 

Figure 2 Summary of Test 3-43 

~ 

Impact Conditions 

Impact Velocity..... 62 09 mph (99.92 km/h) 

Impact Angle... 5.6° 

Location / Orientation... 0.8 in (21 mm) left of the 

article's centerline 

Kinetic Energy......... . 640.3 kip-ft (868.1 kJ ) 

Exit Conditions 

Exit Velocity.. ... ... .. .... .. . N/A 

Exit Angle...... .. ... NIA 

Final Vehicle Position ......... 128.9 ft (39.3 m) downstream 

10.1 ft. (3 1 m) left 

Vehicle Snagging .. ....... . ... None 

Vehicle Pocketing............. None 

Vehicle Stability.................Satisfactory 

Maximum Roll Angle... . .. 5.5° 

Maximum Pitch Angle . 3.7° 

Maximum Yaw Anqle.. ... -7.8° 

Occupant Risk 

Longitudinal OIV... ... 23.6 fUs (7.2 mis) 

Lateral OIV......... ........ 1.3 ft/s (0.4 m/s) 

Longitudinal RA................ -9.1 g 

Lateral RA.. . .. ....... ... ... . -2.3 g 

THIV. . .. ............... 23.6 fUs (7.2 mis) 

PHO ...... .... Q4g 

ASL . ................ 0.59 

Test Article Deflections 

Static... ......:................... N/A 

Maximum Debris Field... 65.5 ft. (20.0 m) left 

127.6 ft. (38.9 m) 

forward 

Vehicle Damage 

Vehicle Damage Scale........ 12-FC-4 

CDC .. ...... ..... . 12FDEW3 

Maximum Intrusion... Floorpan 

13 TR-P37168-01-NC 
MASH Test 3-44 Summary 

0.000 s 0.150 s 0.470 s 0.900 s 1.800 s 

r, .,. 

, ,' --r:::---·· .,.,.; ,, 

" ,, ., IC - - -

·,.,,,: 

-~ 

: 1 r 1 • - '-- ~~1 , . / j( ~ ){ ,,. , _,... -- F· . F?f-1· ... -.-,,_.., . -- l ,, (,' , ...../1 ~;·:·~:1 

General Information Impact Conditions Occupant Risk 

Test Agency ...... ... .. . KARCO Engineering, LLC. Impact Velocity ................ . 60.32 mph (97.07 km/h) Longitudinal OIV.... .. .... .... . 31 .2 ft/s (9.5 mis) 

KARCO Test No .. . P36301-01 Impact Angle........ ......... 20.2° Lateral OIV. .... ........... 3.6 ft/s (1 .1 mis) 

Test Designation .. 3-44 Location / Orientation .. ...... . 0.6 in (15 mm) right of the Longitudinal RA. ... ... ........ -24.4 g 

Test Date .. .. 03/02/17 intended impact point Lateral RA.......... . ... 5.2 g 

Kinetic Energy ...... .. ... ....... 608.7 kip-ft (825.3 kJ ) THIV... .. . . .. ... ... . . .. . . . 31 .5 ft/s (9.6 mis) 

Test Article PHO . .. ...... .. ... .. .. .. .. ... ... . 24.4 g 

Name I Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Big Sandy Exit Conditions ASI ... .. ..... 1.34 

Type...... . .... ..... .... ... . Crash Cushion Exit Velocity ..... . .. N/A 

Article Length ..... ....... 28.1 ft. (8.6 m) Exit Angle .. . NIA Test Article Deflections 

Installation Length .... . ... 49.1 ft (15.0 m) Final Vehicle Position .. . 26. 7 ft (8.1 m) downstream Static N/A 

Road Surface.. . ... ....... Concrete 2.4 in. (61 mm) left Maximum Debris Field .... 44.0 ft. (13.4 m) left 

Vehicle Snagging ............. None 130.3 ft. (39.7 m) forward

Test Vehicle Vehicle Pocketing . . . . . . . . . . . .. None 

Type I Designation .... .. . 2270P Vehicle Stability .................. Satisfactory Vehicle Damage 

Year, Make, and Model ....... 2012 RAM 1500 Maximum Roll Angle ... ........ -7.6° Vehicle Damage Scale .. 12-FC-5 

Curb Mass ..... 5,217.2 lbs (2,366.5 kg) Maximum Pitch Angle ........ .. 1.9° CDC ... ... ..... ... ... ... 12FDEW3 

Test Inertial Mass .............. 5,004.4 lbs (2,270.0 kg) Maximum Yaw Angle ........... 60.9° Maximum Intrusion ... ... ....... Floorpan 

Gross Static Mass ............ 5,004.4 lbs (2,270.0 kg) 

Figure 2 Summary of Test 3-44 

13 TR-P36301-01-NC 
MASH Test 3-44 Summary 

0.000 s 0.100 s 0.160 s 0.250 s 1.400 s

6.2ft. 

[1.9M] 

1 

General Information 

TestAgency ...... .. ...... ..... ... KARCO Engineering, LLC. 

KARCO Test No ...... .... ...... P38019-01 

Test Designation ..... .... ....... 3-44 

Test Date.................. ..... 01/05/18 

Test Article 

Name I Model. .............. .. Big Sandy 

Type............................... . Crash Cushion 

Article Length .................... 28.1 ft. (8.6 m) 

Installation Length ........... ... . 49.1 ft (15.0 m) 

Road Surface.................... Concrete 

Test Vehicle 

Type I Designation.......... .... 2270P 

Year, Make, and Model. ..... .. 2013 RAM 1500 

Curb Mass ......... .............. . 4,784.0 lbs (2,170.0kg) 

Test Inertial Mass .... ... .. ... ... 4,995.6 lbs (2,266 0 kg) 

Gross Static Mass...... .. ..... . 4,995.6 lbs (2,266.0 kg) 

Figure 2 Summary of Test 3-44 

Impact Conditions 

Impact Velocity ... ..... .... .... .. 61 .26 mph (98.59 km/h) 

Impact Angle ...... .. .. .... ... .... 19.9° 

Location/ Orientation .......... Center of vehicle to corner of 

backup structure 

Kinetic Energy ............ ... ... . 626.7 kip-ft (849.7 kJ ) 

Exit Conditions 

Exit Velocity .... ... ... ........ .... N/A 

Exit Angle .. ... .. .......... .... ... . N/A 

Final Vehicle Position ... .... ... 18.2 ft (5.6 m) downstream 

6.2 ft. (1 .9 m) left 

Vehicle Snagging .... ...... .. ... None 

Vehicle Pocketing ..... .......... None 

Vehicle Stability ....... .. ... ..... . Satisfactory 

Maximum Roll Angle .. ..... .. .. -6.1 ° 

Maximum Pitch Angle .......... 5.2° 

Maximum Yaw Angle ......... .. -43.1 ° 

Occupant Risk 

Longitudinal OIV. ............... 35.8 ft/s (10.9 mis) 

Lateral OIV... .. .. .. .............. 4.3 ft/s (1 .3 mis) 

Longitudinal RA ... .... .......... -23.3 g 

Lateral RA........... ... ..... ..... 4.0 g 

THIV. ....................... ....... 35.8 ft/s (10.9 mis) 

PHD............... .. .. ...... ...... . 23.3 g 

ASI. ........... .... .... ... .... .... .. 1.45 

Test Article Deflections 

Static.............................. . NIA 

Maximum Debris Field...... 30.9 ft. (9.4 m) left 

83. 7 ft. (25.5 m) forward 

Vehicle Damage 

Vehicle Damage Scale ... ...... 12-FC-5 

CDC........ ........... ... .. .. .. 12FDEW3 

Maximum Intrusion ... ... ... .. ... Flooroan 

13 TR-P38019-01-NC 
MASH Test 3-45 Summary _,.,.,.. - .........,,..,, .,...,.,..;.....,_j14t! ___ • .,..,. ...,,, rt/ · · "!'- • *"""I _____..,_..,.______

' 

0.000 s 0.050 s 0.100 s 0.200 s 0.350 s 

,_________27' -Bit' (8446 MMl --- ------< 

a· [5MMl ~ 

General Information 

Test Agency ............. ...... . KARCO Engineering, LLC. 

KARCO Test No ........ .... P37167-01 

Test Designation . 3-45 

Test Date .. 5/16/17 

Test Article 

Name /Model . .... ... .. BigSandy 

Type.. . .... .. ... . Crash Cushion 

Article Length ....... 28.1 ft. (8.6 m) 

Installation Length ............. 49.1 ft (15.0 m) 

Road Surface .. .. .. Concrete 

Test Vehicle 

Type/ Designation .. ... .... .. 1500A 

Year, Make, and Model .. . .... 2012 Chevrolet Malibu 

Curb Mass ... 3,263.9 lbs (1 ,480.5 kg) 

Test Inertial Mass .. 3,284.8 lbs (1,490.0 kg) 

Gross Static Mass .... 3,284.8 lbs (1 ,490.0 kg) 

Figure 2 Summary of Test 3-45 

Impact Conditions 

Impact Velocity........... .. 61 .31 mph (98.67 km/h) 

Impact Angle ................... 0.6° 

Location / Orientation ... 0.6 in (1 6 mm) left of the 

article's centerline 

Kinetic Energy .. 412.8 kip-ft (559.6 kJ) 

Exit Conditions 

Exit Velocity ... .... .. .......... N/A 

Exit Angle ..... NIA 

Final Vehicle Position ......... 27.7 ft (8.4 m) downstream 

Vehicle Snagging ..... ... None 

Vehicle Pocketing... .. ... None 

Vehicle Stability ................. Satisfactory 

Maximum Roll Angle .. 5.6° 

Maximum Pitch Angle ........ . 2.7° 

Maximum Yaw Angle ... .... .... -4.5° 

Occupant Risk 

Longitudinal OIV. . . . 22.3 ft/s (6.8 mis) 

Lateral OIV. .. ........... ...... 0.7 ft/s (0.2 mis) 

Longitudinal RA.. .. .... -13.8 g 

Lateral RA .. .. ... .. .. .. . 1 .2 g 

THIV .. 22.3 ft/s (6.8 mis) 

PHD .. ...... ..... .. ........ .. .... 13.8g 

ASI ............................ 0.79 

Test Article Deflections 

Static .......................... .. . N/A 

Maximum Debris Field... ... 65.5 ft. (20.0 m) left 

92.2 ft. (28.1 m) forward 

Vehicle Damage 

Vehicle Damage Scale ....... . 12-FC-4 

CDC ...... 12FDEW3 

Maximum Intrusion .. ......... N/A 

13 TR-P37167-01-NC 
C 

8 7 6 5 4 3 2

28.1ft 

[8.6m) 

4--1 6.00 

[152.40] 

6.00 D 12.00 I D 

[304.80] ~ [152.40] 

MINIMUM ~ MIN. TYP.

-

~ /~ 6.00 

l] 

( ~ ~ ~ ~ +===LJ==::r) (~) (~ )(~ ) C 700 lbs. 400 lbs. 400 lbs. 200 lbs. 

~ ~ 

(320 kg) (180 kg) (180 kg] (90 kg) 

/ ~ 

2100 lbs. 1400 lbs. 700 lbs. 700 lbs. (960 kg) (640 kg) (320 kg) [320 kg) 

RIGID OBJECT 

UNlESS OTHEll:'WISE SPECIFIED: AU DIMENS,ONS AIE IN INCHU[mm[. 

TOlEltANCES: fUCTIOHAL; XIX ! 1/ 1'" [UrNTI) 

DECIMAL: x.x t .our X.XX !.032" 

DECREES:! 0.5 ' 

TrafFix 

Devices Inc. ® 

16U Aventda La Pata SJ11 Clc,;1111..:11/c, CA 92613 (949) 361 -5663 

~:(t~~Pdx~:~iJif~om 

A 

TITLE : 

Big Sandy 

12 Barrel Array 

A 

2. Weight: lbs. [kg] 

1. Units: Inches [mm) 

NOTES: UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED 

DRAWN IY: Chr\Jtoph•1 Jolrn• 

CHECKED IY: FA 

A~~ROVED IY: .. 

DATE: 2/22/ 17 

DATE: 2/22/ 17 

DATE : 2/ 22/ 17 

SIZE 

B DWG. NO. 

200-100 

REV 

C SHEET 1 OF 1 

8 4 
5 4 3 2 

D D

C 

40.30 

[ 1023.62] 

C 

Assembled View 

Exploded View 

UMlESS OTHEltWI SE SPECIFI ED: All DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES[mml. 

TOLERANCES: 

FlACTIOMAl: X/ X ! 1/ 1'" [Unvn] DECIMAl: x.x ! .ous· X.XX ! .Ol T x.xxx !,015" 

OEGllEES: ! o.s· 

TrafFix -,. 

Devices Inc. N ~ 

160 Avemda La Pata S.;11 Clcr1rt.:1ifi..•, CA 92673 (9-:9) 36 1-5663 

:~~',~iTJ/!~tt2~vm 

A 

TITLE : 

Big Sandy Combo Barrel 

A 

1. Units: Inches [mm] 

NOTES: UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED 

OIi.AWN IV : Chrlstoph•1Jolm• 

CHECKED IY: 

FA 

M,lOVE0IY: ,. 

DATE: 2/23/17 

DATE: 2123/1 7 

DATE: 2/ 23/ 17 

SIZE 

B DWG. NO. 

200-101 

REV 

C SHEET 1 OF 1 

4 
D D 

C C 

...._____,,, ...._____,,,/ 40.75 

[1035.05) 

Exploded View Assembled View 

UNlfSS OTHEll:WISE SP'ECIFIE0: 

AU DIMENSIONS AU IN INCHES[m"'J· TOlEllANCfS: 1(:,0 Avemda Ld Pata 

fllACTIONAl: X/ X ! 1/ 1'" [UnvnJ TrafFix S,m Clcuu.:nlc, Cl\ 92673 OEClMAl: x.x ! .o,2r (0~9; 36 1-5663 X.XX ! .OST Devices Inc. 

OfCll:EES: ! 

x.xxx 

0.5" ! .015" e ~~:,(,~~f,//!~t~~vm

TI TLE: A A 

Big Sandy 1400 lbs. Barrel 

DAAWNIY: SIZE DWG. NO. REV DATE: Chrb:lophe1 Jaime 2/ 23/ 17 

1. Units: Inches [mm] CHECKED IY: ,. DATE: B 200-102 C 2/23/ 17 NOTES: UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED A~~ltOVE0 IY: DATE: FA 2/23/ 17 SHEET 1 OF 1

4 
C 

4 

D D 

52.50 

[1333.50) 

Exploded View Assembled View 

A 

UNLESS OTHUWIU Sl'EClflED: 

AU 04.MOISIONS Alf IN INCHESlmmJ . TOLERANCES: 

FRACHONAI.; X/ X ! 1/ 1'" IUrnmJ 

DECIMAL; x.x ! .our X.XX :.OlT 

x.xxx : .015" DEGREES:! o.s· 

1<,o Aven1da La Para TrafFix S•.m Clv,m.:11tc, Cl\ 92673 (049) 36 1-5663 Devices Inc. ~ ~:',~~TJ}!~;Z.tf~vm 

TITLE : 

Big Sandy 2100 lbs. Barrel 

A 

1. Units: Inches [mm) 

NOTES: UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED 

4 

Dlt.A.WNIY : Christoph•• Jolm• 

CHECKED IY: 

FA 

M~IOVED IY: FA 

DATE: 2/23/17 

DATE : 2/23/ 17 

DATE: 2/Jl/ 17 

SIZE 

B DWG. NO. 200-103 

REV 

C SHEET 1 OF 1 

C 
C 

4 

D 

A 6.50 

[165.10] 

2. Material: Black Polyethylene Plastic 

1. Units: Inches [mm) 

NOTES: UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED 

4 3 

UNLESS OTHERWISE stECIAE0: 

AU DIMENSIONS AU IN INCHES[rnml. 

TOlEllANCES: FIIACTIONAl: X/X ! J/ 1,· (Ummj OEClMAl: X.X ! .0,25" 

x.xx ! .osr DfGll:EES; ! 0.5' 

DIU.WN IY: DATE: Chriltoph•r Jaime 2/27/ 17 

CHECKt:0 IY: DATE: 

FA 2/27/17 

A,rltQVED IY: DATE: FA 2/27/ 17 

D 

160 Avernda La Para TrafFix -,. Sd11 C/c1w..ni rc. CA 92673 

1 49) 361 -5663 Devices Inc. ~ ~~'~Wix~~;i:f~Of11 

TITLE: 

A 

Big Sandy Lid 

SIZE DWG. NO. REV 

B 200-104 A 1 SH EET 1 OF 1 

2 

C 
8 

D D 

C C

(/) 37.50 

[952.50] 

(/) 25.00 

,______ [635] -------

0 

25.25 

[641.35] 

UNlEU OTHEIIWISE SPECIFIED: All OIMEN~OMS Alf IN IMCHES!mml. TOLEUNCU: n.u Avemda La Piita 

flACTIOMAl: X/ X ! 1/ 14" 11 ,4mm] TrafFix SJt1 Clcmc11tc. CA 92673 

OfCIMAI.; X.X ! .04.25" 

X.XX !.0lT Devices Inc. 1:;>(~J-1i~~9205 OEGlltEES: ! 0.5' www tr.J fP,xtJdvic:~s cc.xn 

TITLE: 

A Pedestal, Big Sandy A 

Combo Barrel 

SIZE DWG. NO. REV DRAWN IY: DATE:

2. Material: Yellow Polyethylene Plastic Chtutophe1J0im• 7/ 17/ 17 

1. Units: Inches [mm] C

fA 

HECIUD IY: DATE

7/17/ 

:

17 B 200-105 A

NOTES: UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED MPROVE0IY: DATE: SHEET 1 OF 1 fA 7/ 17/ 17 
C 

4 2 

D 

0 37.00 

[939.80] 

A 

2. Material: Yellow Polyethylene Plastic 

1. Units: Inches Imm) 

NOTES: UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED 

20.00 

[sos] 

ofClMAl: ~~i /~i~ DEGREES:~ 0.5• 

DUWNaY: Ch1btopher Jolm• 

CHECKED IY: 

FA 

ArrllOVE0 IY: FA 

4 

D 

UNLESS OIHUWISE S,fClflED: 

All DIMENSIONS AU IN INCHf5{mm). 

}~~~~.:~: X/X ! 1/ 1'" [1.6mm] 

DATE: 

7/ 17/ 17 

DATE: 

7/ 17/ 17 

DATE: 7/17/1 7 

1bU Avemda La Pdfa TrafFix SJn Clcmc11tt.• CA 92573 

Devices Inc. ® 'fj]>f~J-1i6

/92os www tr.itPixtltwictts t.:vm 

TITLE : 

A Canister, Big Sandy 

Combo Barrel 

SIZE DWG. NO. REV 

B 200-106 A SHEET 1 OF 1 

C