alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53637-53638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies

[[Page 53638]]

owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed 
below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 28, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Karen L. Grandstrand, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-2171:
    1. Roscoe Community Bankshares, Inc., Roscoe, South Dakota; to 
become a bank holding company by directly and indirectly acquiring 100 
percent of of the voting shares of Roscoe Financial Services, Inc., 
Roscoe, South Dakota, and thereby indirectly acquire First State Bank 
of Roscoe, Roscoe, South Dakota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 8, 
1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-27178 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### In re ESTATE of Answerl RICHARDSON, Deceased. Frederick W. COPELAND, Petitioner, v. Clifford L. ALLEN, Respondent.

No. 40281.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 28, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 240 So.2d 191.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27225]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the 
Health Care Industry; Notice of Public Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given on the meeting 
of the Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the 
Health Care Industry. This two-day meeting will be limited only by the 
space available.

    Place of Meeting: The Watergate Hotel; 2650 Virginia Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037, ((4) Subcommittee meetings: on 
Tuesday, October 21, 8:00 a.m.--12:30 p.m.; and the General Plenary 
Session II: on Wednesday, October 22, 8:00 a.m.--4:30 p.m.). The 
Embassy Row Hilton Hotel; 2015 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20036, (General Plenary Session I, on Tuesday, 
October 21, 1:00 p.m.--6:30 p.m.). Exact meeting room locations will 
be available on the Commission's web site at ``<a href="http://
www.hcqalitycommission.gov">http://
www.hcqalitycommission.gov</a>''.
    Times and Dates: On Tuesday, October 21, (4) subcommittee(s) 
will meet from 8:00 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. and General Plenary 
Session I will be from 1:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, October 
22, General Plenary Session II will be from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Purpose/Agenda: To hear testimony and continue formal 
proceedings of the full Advisory Commission and the four (4) 
subcommittees. Agenda items are subject to change.
    Contact Person: For more information, including substantive 
program information and summaries of the meeting, please contact: 
Edward (Chip) Malin, Hubert Humphrey Building, Room 118F, 200 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20201; [202/205-3038].

    Dated: October 6, 1997.
Janet Corrigan,
Executive Director, Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and 
Quality in the Health Care Industry.
[FR Doc. 97-27225 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4110-60-M
#### The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation, Appellant, v. George T. GURR, Appellee.

No. 69-833.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 16, 1970.

Rehearing Denied June 29, 1970.

Ralph & Boyd, Miami, and Donald F. Geffner, for appellant.

Guión T. DeLoach, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HEN-DRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The corporate appellant was one of two defendants below. The action was initiated by George Gurr, appellee, alleging that the Home Insurance Company was liable for the loss sustained by Gurr when his vessel, “Tempest I”, was destroyed by fire. The action was predicated upon a policy of insurance which contains a private pleasure warranty, under the terms of which the insured agrees that the vessel is to be used only for private pleasure purposes. Predicating its defense on the above warranty, the appellant denied coverage, arguing that the “Tempest I” was engaged in a commercial search for sunken treasure at the time the loss occurred, and therefore, that the vessel was not within the terms of coverage.

Summary final judgment was granted against the appellant and it has appealed.

We must reverse. The record on appeal demonstrates conclusively that genuine issues of material fact with regard to whether or not the “Tempest I” was engaged in a commercial or pleasure voyage at the time the loss occurred, remained to be determined. The appellant cites numerous facts, based upon record evidence and testimony, which it contends demonstrate that the entire purpose of the particular voyage being taken by the “Tempest I” at the time of the loss was in connection with a continuing search for sunken treasure. The appellee cites evidence in the record which shows that the loss occurred as a result of fire which began while two crewmen were having a coffee break during a routine cruise between Miami and John Penne-kamp Park in Key Largo, Florida. The appellee also argues that no evidence appears in the record to show that the vessel was engaged in a commercial operation or was under charter to a third party at the time of the loss. Suffice it to say that each of these contentions of the parties have merit and appear to be proper subjects for resolution by other than the sum*69mary procedures that were used by the trial court.

Therefore, in accordance with the views expressed in this opinion, we are compelled to reverse the summary final judgment being appealed.

Reversed.
256 La. 83

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Leonard BASTIDA.

No. 50621.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 1970.

In re: Leonard Bastida applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Application denied. It does not appear that the trial judge has abused his discretion in denying the motion for a continuance.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
Exhibit 23.1



| |  |  |  |  |  |                                             
| |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  |  |  | LOGO                                        
| |  |  |  |  |  | Gaffney, Cline & Associates, Inc.           
| |  |  |  |  |  | 5555 San Felipe St., Suite 550              
| |  |  |  |  |  | Houston, TX 77056 Telephone: +1 713 850
9955
| |  |  |  |  |  | www.gaffney-cline.com                       

March 27, 2017

YPF Sociedad Anónima

Macacha Güemes 515

C1106BKK Buenos Aires

Argentina

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the references to
Gaffney, Cline & Associates and to the inclusion of our third-party letter report dated March 9, 2017, as set forth under the sections Item 4 Information on the CompanyExploration and Production OverviewOil and
Gas Reserves, Item 19 Exhibits, and as Exhibit 99.1 in YPF Sociedad Anónimas (YPF S.A.) report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016, to be filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Our third-party letter report dated March 9, 2017, contains our independent audit of the proved
crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids, gasoline and marketable gas reserves as of December 31, 2016, of certain selected properties in Argentina in which YPF S.A. holds interests.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|Yours sincerely,
Gaffney, Cline & Associates
|LOGO                                        
|Daniel Amitrano Principal
Advisor
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
K-1 

APPENDIX K

FLOW CHARTS ILLUSTRATING DECISION RULES
K-2
K-3
K-4
K-5
K-6
K-7
K-8
K-9
K-10
K-11
K-12
K-13
K-14
K-15
K-16
K-17
K-18
K-19
K-20
K-21
K-22
K-23 
K-24
K-25
K-26
K-27
K-28
K-29
K-30
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  **Date:              November 16, 2007** | **/s/                Joseph P. Mackin****Joseph                P.Mackin****Chief Executive                Officer ** |
|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  **Date:              November 16, 2007  ** | **/s/                Gino M. Pereira****Gino M. Pereira****Chief Financial                Officer** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**                                                                               **

**                                                                                   **
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EDWARD J. NICHOLAS, )

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) Civil Action No. 05-279 ERIE

)

COMMONWEALTH OF PA et. al., )

Defendants. )

)

ORDER

AND NOW this 13th day of October, 2006, after consideration of the Plaintiff’s 

Petition for Reconsideration and Change of venue for Consideration in Another State (Doc #10)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Petition is DENIED AS MOOT.

 S/Sean J. McLaughlin 

Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: counsel/parties of record NK 

Case 1:05-cv-00279-SJM-SPB Document 11 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 1
Advisory and Consulting Agreement



 
Exhibit 4.1

 
Advisory and Consulting Agreement Summary

 

	 	    	 Number of Shares and Options


	 4.1(a)
	    	 9,000,000

	 4.1(b)
	    	 3,000,000

	 4.1(c)
	    	 4,000,000

	 4.1(d)
	    	 100,000

	 4.1(e)
	    	 1,750,000

	 4.1(f)
	    	 5,000,000

	 4.1(g)
	    	 6,000,000

	 4.1(h)
	    	 800,000

	 	    	

	 Total
	    	 29,650,000
0

0.10.20.30.40.50.60.7

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 

SO2 Emissions (lb/mmBtu)

Year

Figure 1.a. NPPD-Gerald Gentleman SO2 Rate

Unit #1 SO2_RATEUnit #2 SO2_RATE
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of MTM Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31. 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven Stringer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |                                      
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Date: June
  29, 2007 | /s/ Steven
  Stringer                
|                      |                                      
|                      | Steven
  Stringer                    
|                      | President and Chief Operating Officer

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Richard SAULSBERRY.

No. 62090.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana through the District Attorney, Harry F. Connick, Parish of Orleans, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Denied.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., would grant the writ.

TATE, J.,

concurs. While the fingerprint record in my opinion is a business record, the State did not authenticate its admission by testimony from the custodian or a witness with authority from the custodian.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2996 

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to extend 

and enhance the Rural Microentrepreneur Assistance Program, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. RICKETTS (for himself and Ms. SMITH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development 

Act to extend and enhance the Rural Microentrepreneur 

Assistance Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Microentre5 preneur Assistance Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN FUNDING FOR THE RURAL MICRO7 ENTREPRENEUR ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 

8 Section 379E of the Consolidated Farm and Rural 

9 Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2008s) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2996 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a)(4), by striking ‘‘$50,000’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘$75,000’’; 

3 (2) in subsection (b)(3), by adding at the end 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘(E) USE OF FUNDS.—A microloan made 

6 by a microenterprise development organization 

7 to a microentrepreneur under this paragraph 

8 for a project may be used to cover not more 

9 than 50 percent of any demolition, construction, 

10 or related costs of real estate improvements 

11 under the project.’’; 

12 (3) in subsection (c)(1)(A), by striking ‘‘75 per13 cent’’ and inserting ‘‘100 percent’’; and 

14 (4) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘2019 through 

15 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2024 through 2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Arthur Lee JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-94.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 27, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied. See Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 1.850, 33 F.S.A.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LUIS TORRES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) Civil Action No. 08-200 Erie

)

JEFFREY BEARD, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on July 9, 2008

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on June 28, 2010 [30],

recommends that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute [29] be

granted and the instant civil rights action be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. 

The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. 

Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail at SCI Albion, his last address of record,

and on the Defendants. No objections have been filed. After de novo review of the

complaint and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation,

the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 22 day of July, 2010; nd

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to

Prosecute [29] be, and hereby is, GRANTED and the instant civil rights action be, and

hereby is, DISMISSED for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. 

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated June

28, 2010 [30], is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

 s/ SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN

Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: all parties of record 

U.S. Magistrate Judge Baxter

Case 1:08-cv-00200-SJM-SPB Document 31 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,878
<ALLOWANCES>                                       763
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,133
<PP&E>                                       1,765,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,727,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,355
<BONDS>                                        617,878
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    238,205
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     815,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,727,926
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,986
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,664
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,664
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,664
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63


</TABLE>
#### Freida F. SEKEMA and Paul Sekema, her husband, Appellants, v. Mary WILSON, James M. Wilson, her husband, L. W. Baynard and Paul E. Thompson, d/b/a Baynard’s Beach Memorial Chapel, Appellees.

No. 69-335.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 22, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 25, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JAIME MENESES MENA, :

:

Petitioner :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-15-768

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : (Judge Brann)

:

Respondent :

ORDER

April 28, 2015

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. The Clerk of Court is directed to TRANSFER this matter to

the United States District Court for the Western District of

Pennsylvania. 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

1

Case 4:15-cv-00768-MWB-JVW Document 4 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 1