alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Mark Scott, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. As the registrant's certifying officer I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: November 17, 2005                 /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
MEMORANDUM TO THE FILE 

Subject: Telephone Conversation with Kelcey Stricker, Pechanga Environmental Director 

and Ed Roybal, Pechanga Tribal Counsel’s Office Regarding the Late Comment 

Letter from the Pechanga Tribal Chairman dated March 3, 2015 

 

From: Ken Israels 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

Date: March 4, 2015 

On March 4, 2015, after receiving the above correspondence, I arranged a conference call 

with Kelcey Stricker, the Pechanga Tribe’s Environmental Director, and Ed Roybal of the 

Pechanga Tribal Counsel’s Office to discuss the March 3, 2015 comment letter on our proposed 

action. 

We agreed that the comment letter was late and as such, it was at EPA’s discretion as to 

whether or not we would address their comments. I informed them that, regardless of whether or 

not we would address the comments submitted, the late comment letter would be included in the 

docket for the final rulemaking. I also confirmed with Ms. Stricker and Mr. Roybal my 

understanding that the late comment letter was not a comment about our proposed action, but 

rather a comment on or response to the comments submitted by South Coast Air Quality 

Management District on February 5, 2015. 

As a result of our conference call, Mr. Roybal and Ms. Stricker concurred with EPA’s 

position not to respond to the Pechanga Tribe’s March 3, 2015 late comment letter.
Exhibit 31.2

NUTRITIONAL SOURCING CORPORATION
CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Daniel J. O'Leary, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Nutritional Sourcing
    Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
    of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
    report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material
    respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
    the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
    to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
    board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
    or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
    are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability
    to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
    and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
    internal control over financial reporting.


Date: January 28, 2004

/s/ Daniel J. O'Leary
Daniel J. O'Leary
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          40,460
<SECURITIES>                                    14,219
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                       381
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,221
<PP&E>                                           2,690
<DEPRECIATION>                                     668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,941
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,101
<SALES>                                          2,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,814
<CGS>                                              550
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,768
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    42
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,123)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,123)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,123)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

of
our reports dated February 28, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of NTL Incorporated, NTL Incorporated management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of NTL Incorporated, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP
London, England
February 28, 2006

---



Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

of
our reports dated February 28, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of NTL Investment Holdings Limited, included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP
London, England
February 28, 2006

---



QuickLinks
|       | (1)    |       | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |   |
|                           | (2)    |                           | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| Date: April 13, 2010 | By:                               | /s/ Samuel Rubinstein                          |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                              | Samuel Rubinstein                              |
|                      |                              | Senior Vice President, General Manager         |
|                      |                              |                                           |
|                      | By:      | /s/ Ron Kolker                                 |
|                      |                              | Ron Kolker                                     |
|                      |                              | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Vu1 Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
T. Grieger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Matthew J. DeVries, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated
      as of March 31, 2009
                
                /s/ David T. GriegerDavid
      T. Grieger
                  Chief
      Executive OfficerDated
      as of March 31, 2009
                
                /s/ Matthew DeVriesMatthew
      DeVries
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27678]



[[Page 54497]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice PN 2604]


Office of Defense Trade Controls; Reinstatement of Eligibility To 
Apply for Export/Retransfer Authorizations Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) 
of the Arms Export Control Act

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of persons who have had their 
eligibility to apply for export/retransfer authorizations reinstated 
pursuant to section 38(g)(4) of the Arms Export Control Act, (the 
AECA), (22 U.S.C. 2778(g)(4)) and section 127.11(b) (formerly section 
127.10(b)) of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, (the 
ITAR), (22 C.F.R. Parts 120-130).

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 17, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Philip S. Rhoads, Chief, Compliance Enforcement Branch, Compliance 
Division, Office of Defense Trade Controls, Bureau of Political-
Military Affairs, Department of State (703) 875-6644.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 38(g)(A) of the AECA and section 
127.11(a) of the ITAR prohibit the issuance of export licenses or other 
approvals to a person, or any party to export, who has been convicted 
of violating certain U.S. criminal statutes enumerated at section 
38(g)(1) of the AECA and section 120.27 of the ITAR. The term 
``person'' means a natural person as well as a corporation, business 
association, partnership, society, trust, or any other entity, 
organization, or group, including governmental entities. The term 
``party to the export'' means the president, the chief executive 
officer, and other senior officers of the license applicant; and any 
consignee or end user of any item to be exported.
    The statute permits reinstatement of eligibility to apply for 
export/retransfer authorizations on a case-by-case basis after 
consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and after a thorough 
review of the circumstances surrounding the conviction or ineligibility 
to export and finding that appropriate steps have been taken to 
mitigate any law enforcement concerns.
    In accordance with these authorities, effective June 17, 1997, 
eligibility for Teledyne Wah Chang (TWC) export and retransfer 
authorizations has been reinstated pursuant to section 38(g)(4) of the 
AECA and section 127.11 of the ITAR.
    The effect of this notice is that TWC may once again participate in 
the export or transfer of defense articles or defense services subject 
to section 38 of the AECA and the ITAR.

    Dated: October 2, 1997.
William J. Lowell,
Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls, Bureau of Political-
Military Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 97-27678 Filed 10-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES

                                -----------------

                         DWS Gold & Precious Metals Fund

Effective July 31, 2009, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (the
"Advisor") assumed all day-to-day advisory responsibilities for the fund that
were previously delegated to Deutsche Asset Management International GmbH
("DeAMi") pursuant to an interim subadvisory agreement between the Advisor and
DeAMi. All references to DeAMi are hereby deleted.





               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference




August 5, 2009                                            [DWS INVESTMENTS LOGO]
DSSF2-3605                                                   Deutsche Bank Group

<PAGE>

Supplement to the currently effective Statement of Additional Information for
the listed fund:

DWS Gold & Precious Metals Fund
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Effective July 31, 2009, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (the
"Advisor") assumed all day-to-day advisory responsibilities for the fund that
were previously delegated to Deutsche Asset Management International GmbH
("DeAMi") pursuant to an interim subadvisory agreement between the Advisor and
DeAMi. All references to DeAMi are hereby deleted.


               Please Retain this Supplement for Future Reference


August 5, 2009
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3373 

AN ACT 

To require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to 

extend the time period during which licensees are required to commence construction of certain hydropower 

projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3373 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMMENCE CON2 STRUCTION OF CERTAIN HYDROPOWER 

3 PROJECTS. 

4 (a) DEFINITION OF COVERED PROJECT.—In this sec5 tion, the term ‘‘covered project’’ means a hydropower 

6 project with respect to which the Federal Energy Regu7 latory Commission issued a license before March 13, 2020. 

8 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF EXTENSION.—Notwith9 standing section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

10 806), on the request of a licensee of a covered project, 

11 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission may, after 

12 reasonable notice and for good cause shown, extend in ac13 cordance with subsection (c) the period during which the 

14 licensee is required to commence construction of the cov15 ered project for an additional 4 years beyond the 8 years 

16 authorized by that section. 

17 (c) PERIOD OF EXTENSION.—An extension of time 

18 to commence construction of a covered project under sub19 section (b) shall— 

20 (1) begin on the date on which the final exten21 sion of the period for commencement of construction 

22 granted to the licensee under section 13 of the Fed23 eral Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) expires; and 

24 (2) end on the date that is 4 years after the lat25 est date to which the Federal Energy Regulatory 
3 

†S 3373 ES

1 Commission is authorized to extend the period for 

2 commencement of construction under that section. 

3 (d) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

4 time period required under section 13 of the Federal 

5 Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) to commence construction of 

6 a covered project expires after December 31, 2023, and 

7 before the date of enactment of this Act— 

8 (1) the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

9 may reinstate the license for the applicable project 

10 effective as of the date of expiration of the license; 

11 and 

12 (2) the extension authorized under subsection 

13 (b) shall take effect on the date of that expiration. 

Passed the Senate December 18 (legislative day, December 16), 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3373 

AN ACT 

To require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commiscertain hydropower projects. censees are required to commence construction of sion to extend the time period during which li-
#### RUSSIAN v. UNITED STATES.

No. 6131.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Jan. 25, 1937.

R. L. Levy and George W. Ellis, both of Scranton, Pa., for appellant.

Frederick V. Follmer, U. S. Atty., of. Scranton, Pa., Julius C. Martin, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, D. C., Wilbur C. Pickett, Sp. Asst, to the Atty. Gen., and Young M. Smith, of Washington, D. C., Atty., Department of Justice, for the United States.

Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, arid THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This war risk insurance case was considered by this court in an opinion reported in 73 F.(2d) 363, 365. Therein the facts were marshaled and discussed with the thoroughness and detail characteristic of the judge delivering the same, and ■ it was there held: “The District Court fell into error in refusing the government’s motion for a directed ver-' diet.” A new trial "'being allowed in such *896decision, the case was tried again and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff, but, in an opinion reported in (D.C.) 12 F. Supp. 660, a new trial was granted and, on the third trial, the court directed a verdict for the defendant. From this the plaintiff appealed.

After due consideration, we are of opinion the trial judge was right in giving binding instructions. The evidence in the case, while differing in amount, did not differ in degree or character from that passed upon by this court when the case was heard before us and, as we view it, was substantially the same as in the first trial.

In the final analysis we may apply to the present case what was said by this court in its former opinion: “With the exception of part of February and March 1926, and all of February 1927 during which time he underwent -an operation for appendicitis, this four year period of employment was uninterrupted. From our estimate of the veteran’s employment after he left the sanitarium late in 1919, it appears that in the eight years in question he was, for one reason or another, out of work or unable to work for periods aggregating about a year. Assuming his disability to have been permanent when the policy was in force, manifestly it could not, on the facts, have been ‘total,’ however liberally the word may be construed. Lumbra v. United States, supra [290 U.S. 551, 54 S.Ct. 272, 78 L.Ed. 492].”

So holding, we limit ourselves to stating that in our view the trial judge was right in holding that on the case now presented it was his duty to give binding instructions for the defendant. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.