Page 1 of 60

GEORGIA 

2022 ANNUAL REPORT 

Disclaimer: This report is the property of the State Department of Transportation (State DOT). The State DOT 

completes the report by entering applicable information into the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Highway 

Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) online reporting tool. Once the State DOT completes the report pertaining to its 

State, it coordinates with its respective FHWA Division Office to ensure the report meets all legislative and regulatory 

requirements. FHWA’s Headquarters Office of Safety then downloads the State’s finalized report and posts it to the 

website (https://highways.dot.gov/safety/hsip/reporting) as required by law (23 U.S.C. 148(h)(3)(A)). 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 2 of 60

Table of Contents

Disclaimer .............................................................................................................................................3

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence .............................................................3

Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................4

Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................6

Program Structure ................................................................................................................................. 6

Program Administration .....................................................................................................................6

Program Methodology .....................................................................................................................10

Project Implementation .......................................................................................................................23

Funds Programmed.........................................................................................................................23

General Listing of Projects ..............................................................................................................25

Safety Performance ............................................................................................................................40

General Highway Safety Trends......................................................................................................40

Safety Performance Targets............................................................................................................46

Applicability of Special Rules ...........................................................................................................49

Evaluation ...........................................................................................................................................50

Program Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................50

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements .......................................................51

Project Effectiveness .......................................................................................................................54

Compliance Assessment ....................................................................................................................56

Optional Attachments ..........................................................................................................................59

Glossary ..............................................................................................................................................60
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 3 of 60

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence 

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or 

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action 

for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, 

schedules, lists, or other data.” 

23 U.S.C. 407 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data 

compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential 

accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, 

and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement project 

which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted 

into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for 

damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, 

schedules, lists, or data.” 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 4 of 60

Executive Summary

The purpose of the Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is to provide for a continuous and 

data-driven process that identifies and reviews specific traffic safety issues around the state to identify 

locations for potential safety enhancements. The ultimate vision of the HSIP process is to eliminate all roadway 

fatality & serious injury crashes on all of Georgia’s roadways through the implementation of engineering 

solutions and safety educational outreach. 

Each year, the Department sets aside safety funding to implement safety projects. The total HSIP funds 

allocated in a given fiscal year (FY) is approximately $ 100 million. In addition to this amount, the Department 

delivered an additional $60.3 million in safety-focused projects for FY 22. These additional projects included 

intersection improvements, such as roundabouts, and pedestrian improvements that span across several 

districts. Across the US, motor vehicle fatal crashes in 2021 are estimated to be the highest in 16 years. 

Nationally, there are an estimated 42,900 people to have died in motor vehicle crashes in 2021, a 10 percent 

increase from the previous year and the highest in 96 years. Georgia saw similar trends with a 7% increase in 

fatal crashes. The trends in fatal crashes increase in most emphasis areas, including pedestrian and lane 

departure. There was also a notable increase in fatal crashes in the age group of 15 to 24-year-olds, young 

drivers, and people not wearing their seatbelts. City roadways saw a comparable increase in fatal crashes to 

the state routes system with 10%. Upon reviewing all fatal crash reports there are notable trends, speed, 

driving under the influence, and driver behavior. Some drivers still have tendencies that they developed during 

the pandemic. These tendencies, combined with more vehicles returning to the roadway, have shown to be a 

contributing factor to fatal and serious injury crashes. These trends are closely monitored by all highway safety 

professionals in Georgia and remain the focus of the state’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). 

The Governor’s Office of Highway Safety (GOHS) and the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) 

develops and supports the SHSP. The plan has specific Emphasis Area Task Teams that are organized to 

develop specific countermeasures. These teams have continued their work over the past year and remain a 

critical part of the SHSP, HSP, and HSIP collaborative. 

Over the past FY, the GDOT Safety Program used a data-driven process to successfully locate viable safety 

projects that meet our HSIP goals. Projects that comprise the HSIP are usually moderately-sized projects that 

include safety improvements in the following areas; intersection, pedestrian and bicycle, roadway departure, 

corridor, off-system, and older roadway users. In addition, safety improvements identified through Road Safety 

Audits (RSA)s are pursued through district resources, local agencies, and capital projects. Safety projects may 

be nominated or identified from a large number of sources. RSAs are selected using the safety analytic 

platform, Numetric. This application allows the Department to utilize resources efficiently and develop a top 10 

data-driven list for each District. The Safety Program then works with the District and local governments to 

confirm at least 14 RSAs for the FY. The Safety Program used a hybrid platform for RSAs, including virtual and 

in-person RSAs. A project may qualify as a safety project because of an existing safety problem, because of 

evidence that it will prevent an unsafe condition, or because it falls into one of several identified categories of 

improvements that are known to provide safety benefits. Examples of this last category include guardrails, 

traffic signals, railroad crossing warning devices, and most intersection improvements. Pedestrian and bicycle 

facilities are an important feature of the safety program, which is eligible for safety enhancement projects. 

Once a location has been identified, a crash screening is performed to confirm if there is a viable safety 

project. If viable, an intersection control evaluation (if applicable) and traffic engineering study are performed to 

confirm a safety benefit/cost (S-BC) for a potential project. 

Every Georgia DOT project is designed and constructed to meet or exceed federal safety guidelines. GDOT 

continues to look for innovative ways to improve safety. Redefining our processes, revision of guidelines, and 

continued enhancement of Numetric are highlights of these efforts. GDOT worked with FHWA, engineering 

consultants, and local governments to test and validate the tools using examples from daily work to ensure the 

tools will support their efforts to identify potential safety project locations throughout the state on all public 

roads. The new tools have already provided significant safety benefits by reducing the time it takes to analyze 

and locate potential safety projects. New proactive approaches to justify safety projects that are being further 

explored are near-miss and connected vehicle data. 

Additionally, the Office of Traffic Operations is refining and utilizing our crash data to improve safety and 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 5 of 60

eliminate fatality crashes and reduce serious injuries crashes. This past year GDOT has been working closely 

with our safety partners and local law enforcement to improve the reporting accuracy in the State’s Motor 

Vehicle Crash Report. The effort to improve reporting accuracy will further advance the identification of 

potential safety enhancement opportunities for both engineered and behavioral countermeasures. These 

efforts continue to advance the overall objectives of the Governor’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan.

Cumulatively, GDOT has advanced several initiatives to promote safety on all Georgia roadways. We are 

building roundabout intersections, increasing the use of cable barriers on divided roadways, installing concrete 

medians, installing rumble strips, installing more retro-reflective signage, applying pavement markings, 

improving intersection conspicuity, installing high friction surface treatment, coordinating traffic signal timing, 

and installing pedestrian accommodations to make our roads safer for all users.
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 6 of 60

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of achieving 

a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 

924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP implementation 

and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the HSIP Reporting Guidance dated 

December 29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, progress in implementing highway safety 

improvement projects, progress in achieving safety outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the 

improvements and compliance assessment. 

Program Structure

Program Administration 

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the vision to eliminate 

fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 924.15, States are 

required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP implementation and evaluation 

efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the Reporting Guidance. Projects identified for the program 

are requested by our GDOT District Engineers, local governments and GDOT Central Office Engineers. All 

ideas are evaluated to determine if the proposed projects fit our HSIP program and support the SHSP. If a 

proposed project is determined to be a candidate for the HSIP it must compete with all other non systemic 

projects based upon its benefit : cost ratio. Those projects with the highest B:C are advanced based on our 

available funding capacity. 

Following our planned HSIP budget, GDOT's program has the following core elements which will have some 

overlap: 

Vulnerable Roadway User Safety ($15 - 20 million) 

Intersection Safety ($40 - 74 million) 

Roadway and Lane Departure ($15 - 20 million) 

Off System Safety ($7 - 10million) 

Safety Educational Outreach ($1 million) 

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Operations

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

• Central Office via Statewide Competitive Application Process 

• SHSP Emphasis Area Data 

• Other-systemic 

• Other-Data Driven Safety Analysis 

• Other-Off System Safety 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 7 of 60

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP.

The state is continuing the high-risk rural roads program as part of the HSIP. Additionally, the state has an 

established Off System Safety (OSS) Program that works through the District coordinators. The Department 

employs District coordinators that work with the Department's District Traffic Operations and local government 

to identify a group of roads that are not part of the state highway system that have safety deficiencies. The 

District coordinators use a data-driven approach to identify potential safety enhancements on off-system roads 

and intersections. A public-facing application utilizing Numetric is available for any local partner to use. This 

application provides analysis and the ability to download crash data. The more advanced Numetric application 

is also available for locals upon request and provided free of charge. Additionally, we have been working with 

FHWA and pilot counties to develop Local Road Safety Plans (LRSP) where local DOTs develop their plans in 

coordination with GDOT. The goal is to get local governments to proactively think about and address road 

safety. Like our traditional approach, local governments would develop a list of roads and countermeasures 

based on the LRSP.

Once potential off-system safety projects are identified, the list is prioritized and selected by a review team. 

The cost of planned safety improvements is taken into consideration as well as the effectiveness of each 

countermeasure. The safety program’s goal is to dedicate at least $1 million annually to each of the state's 

seven districts for off-system safety projects. This money is solely used to fund our off-system safety program.

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) 

Bureaus, Divisions) are involved with HSIP planning.

• Design

• Districts/Regions

• Governors Highway Safety Office

• Local Aid Programs Office/Division

• Maintenance

• Operations

• Planning

• Traffic Engineering/Safety

• Other-Office of Environmental Services

• Other-Other-District traffic engineers

• Other-• Office of Program Delivery 

Describe coordination with internal partners.

The Safety Program works closely with GDOT Maintenance and District Traffic Operations. Each month we 

meet with each of our seven districts and our safety design consulting teams. We work together to identify sites 

based on local knowledge and crash data. Additionally, as road maintenance plans are being developed the 

district traffic operations teams review sites and plans to ensure signs and pavement markings meet current 

specifications. We are also working with these teams to advance rumble strips and safety edge as part of all 

resurfacing projects. The traffic operations teams and HSIP/Safety Section work with our Off-System Local 

State Aid Coordinators to identify viable project locations using the data-driven county report cards. 

The Office of Program Delivery (OPD) plays a large role in the delivery of safety projects for the Department. 

The Safety Program coordinates weekly with OPD to discuss ongoing safety projects, task orders, and 

upcoming safety projects to be transitioned. Coordination with other offices, such as Environmental Services, 

Utilities, Railroad Safety, Roundabout and Alternative Intersection Design (RAID), and Engineering Services, is 

key in the development and delivery of safety projects.
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 8 of 60

The Safety Program coordinates with Design Policy and our consulting team to update and refine pedestrian 

safety through the Pedestrian Streetscape Guide and coordinates these efforts with other GDOT offices to 

ensure design elements are incorporated when appropriate. We work with these same teams to update our 

rumble strip/stripe details and the Design Policy Manual, when needed. We work with our Planning Office to 

educate MPOs on our 5 core performance measures and their roles. Lastly, the Safety Program works with our 

GDOT Materials and Testing partners to explore updates in our high friction surface treatment standards.

These activities are critical pieces to support the goals of the Serious Crash Type Task Team and OSS efforts.

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning.

• Academia/University

• FHWA

• Governors Highway Safety Office

• Law Enforcement Agency

• Local Government Agency 

• Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs)

• Other-Public Safety & Local Law Enforcement

Georgia’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) involves a variety of internal and external partners at the 

federal, state, and local levels as well as in the private sector. The SHSP was updated and in place during FY 

2015 with Task Teams developing plans for the various Emphasis Areas. The task teams are comprised of a 

combination of engineering, emergency management, enforcement, and education professionals who come 

from community organizations, private businesses, schools, and public institutions. The teams work together to 

establish a measurable goal(s) that are designed to improve one or more of the established emphasis areas. 

Throughout the year, the teams track their progress against their goal(s). The teams report their progress to 

the participating groups and the Governor’s Office of Highway Safety (GOHS). Also, the GOHS holds semiannual Safety Program Leadership Meetings for the Executive Board and task team leaders. GDOT’s 

Pedestrian, Bicycle, Intersection, and Roadway Departure Safety Action Plans are executed to implement 

engineering solutions to address highway safety problems. GDOT’s Safety Action Plans are key components 

of its HSIP and all are aligned with the goals of the state’s SHSP and a number of its Emphasis Areas.

Georgia’s SHSP Key Emphasis Areas are as follows:

· Occupant Protection - Seatbelts and Air Bags

· Serious Crash Type - Intersections, Keeping Vehicles on the Road - lane departure, Head-on, and Cross 

Median Crashes

· Impaired Driver

· Distracted Driving

· Age-related issues - Graduated Driver's Licensing, Younger Adult Drivers, Older Drivers

· Non-motorized User - Pedestrians, Bicyclists

· Vehicle Type - Heavy Trucks, Motorcycle

Additionally, the following teams support the task teams by addressing unique needs associated with the 

team's goals.
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 9 of 60

· Trauma System/Increasing EMS Capabilities

· Traffic/Crash Records and Data Analysis

· Traffic Incident Management Enhancement (TIME)

Describe coordination with external partners.

GDOT works with local governments, agencies and MPOs to develop the HSIP. The groups connect with our 

Office of Planning, Office of Program Delivery, and District Offices and directly to the Office of Traffic 

Operations. They can present project ideas, provide studies and relate public comments. Each request is 

examined to determine if it is a reasonable fit and eligible for HSIP funding. GDOT continues to work closely 

with the State's GOHS and MPOs to develop the state's safety performance targets. The process includes 

multiple presentations and working sessions. The crash data queries and data forecasting methodology was 

presented to local FHWA and NHTSA representatives last year and adopted by the TRCC working group. Over 

the past year GDOT has successfully expanded a crash data query and analysis platform by partnering with 

Numetric Inc. The tools allow for graphic, spatial and tabular views of the State's crash data. We have given 

multiple presentations to both internal and external partners. One example, is GDOT Safety worked closely 

with FHWA and local government engineers to support the development of Local Road Safety Plans. We have 

also allowed both FHWA and local engineers to participate in our weekly conference call with Numetric Inc. 

This example highlights how Georgia's safety partners collaborate across organizational boundaries to 

advance safety for all road users.

Describe other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to 

elaborate. 

The State is continuing the enhancement of a web-based crash and network screening application that is 

available to all our safety partners. This tool promotes the rapid identification and analysis of all public road 

locations applying the Highway Safety Manual (HSM). This approach is improving how safety projects are 

identified for the Safety Program. New upcoming features are the auto-generated crash collision diagrams and 

intersection analysis tool. Additionally, we continue to improve our safety project tracking database (GOASIS). 

This database is accessible to GDOT and our engineering teams. The interface allows for tracking of projects 

as they work their way through the Plan Development Process (PDP). 

The Safety Program is also in the development of a new process to deliver certain safety projects in a more 

efficient manner. Projects that have no right-of-way, limited environmental impact, and follow HSIP procedures 

might have the ability to be delivered through an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) type process. 

The Safety Program also redefined several procedures in the past year. The process for which a safety project 

is developed has been redefined into several steps to ensure the most viable safety projects are selected for 

Georgia’s roadways. The process starts by identifying a potential safety concern. A crash screening is a new 

tool that was developed recently by the Safety Program. This document's main purpose is to confirm a safety 

justification. If a strong justification is not provided the location goes into a monitoring status for a determined 

period. The crash screening provides high level information on a location’s geometric characteristics, 

evaluation of other projects in the area, probe speed data, GIS information, and traffic volumes. More 

importantly the crash screening provides a detailed review of the crashes at a given location by breaking out 

manner of collision, severity, and time. This analysis provides a look into what the potential crash trends are. 

The last section of a crash screening is the alternative analysis. Given the crash trends at the intersection, 

alternatives are proposed and a preliminary benefit-cost ratio is provided.

If the crash screening provides a justification for a safety project the analysis is moved to an intersection 

control evaluation (ICE), if applicable. Alternatives proposed in the crash screening are evaluated and 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 10 of 60

confirmed in stage 1 ICE. The most viable safety alternatives are selected for stage 2 ICE. The ICE tool ranks 

the final alternatives and provides a more defined benefit-cost. The alternative that has the highest ranking and 

benefit-cost, and shows to be a competitive safety project, is selected to move to the next stage, a traffic 

engineering (TE) study. A TE study can be performed once an alternative is selected from the ICE. The TE 

study takes the information gathered so far in the process and provides more details on the proposed project. 

For example, site visits are conducted to gain exact measures, update crash analysis, provide operational 

analysis, develop a layout, review of alternatives found in stage 2 ICE and recommendations. In addition, risk 

factors such as environmental, ROW, and utility are examined. 

A project is transitioned to OPD once a TE study has been signed. This is when the project is assigned a 

project identification (PI) number. A transition meeting is scheduled to discuss the project and what 

coordination needs to take place with other offices or agencies. Depending on the project size and complexity, 

additional meetings can be scheduled. A full or limited concept report is developed for most projects. This 

document provides additional information to confirm all applicable offices agree with the scope. Design on a 

project can start once a concept report is approved. Design may include one or several field plan meetings, 

scheduled at different stages of the design. This is to ensure the design is being done correctly. When the 

project package is complete the project is ready for construction letting. Once approved for letting, the project 

is sent out to GDOT prequalified contractors. All completed safety projects are reviewed to gain a bettering 

understanding of their effectiveness on Georgia roadways. A project is evaluated once there is an adequate 

amount of safety data for a project. Any improvements during this review are documented and can be used for 

similar future safety projects.

The RSA process was also revised to ensure the best process is in place to select locations using a safety 

data-driven and collaborative process. In addition to 14 RSA, additional RSAs are performed under the Safe 

Routes to School Program each year. These RSAs are focused on segments of roadways that are near 

schools and have documented crash trends. A top ten list of potential RSA locations for the upcoming fiscal 

year is developed for each District in the final quarter of a fiscal year. The projects are ranked in terms of 

potential safety benefit, which is directly derived from the frequency and severity of crashes along a segment of 

roadway. The list of potential RSA locations is shared with the corresponding District and other essential 

stakeholders. The goal is to select at least two RSAs per District. The Safety Program’s RSA team then 

collects data and performs preliminary analysis. All RSAs are performed in the first two quarters of a fiscal year 

to ensure there is enough time to develop recommendations and deliver a final report.

Program Methodology

Does the State have an HSIP manual or similar that clearly describes HSIP planning, 

implementation and evaluation processes?

Yes

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP.

• Bicycle Safety

• Horizontal Curve

• HRRR

• Intersection

• Local Safety

• Median Barrier

• Pedestrian Safety

• Roadway Departure

• Sign Replacement And Improvement

• Skid Hazard

• Wrong Way Driving
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 11 of 60

• Other-Off System Safety 

Program: Bicycle Safety

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2018

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only

• Other-Bicycle Crashes

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:2

Available funding:1

Other-stakeholder interest:3
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 12 of 60

Program: Horizontal Curve

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2013

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes • Horizontal curvature

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Competitive application process

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:1

Program: HRRR

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2012

What is the justification for this program? 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 13 of 60

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes

• Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only

• Functional classification

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Competitive application process

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:100

Other-District / Commitee:2

Program: Intersection

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2012

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 14 of 60

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes

• Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only

• Traffic

• Volume

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Crash rate

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Competitive application process

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Relative Weight in Scoring

Ranking based on B/C:100

Total Relative Weight:100

Program: Local Safety

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2019

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Other-Local Funding

What data types were used in the program methodology? 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 15 of 60

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes • Other-Ownership

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Equivalent property damage only (EPDO Crash frequency)

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Other-Local Safety Plans

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Available funding:1

Program: Median Barrier

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2013

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes • Median width

• Functional classification
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 16 of 60

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:2

Available funding:1

Program: Pedestrian Safety

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2013

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 17 of 60

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:1

Available funding:3

Other-stakeholder interest:2

Program: Roadway Departure

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2013

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes

• Fatal and serious injury crashes 

only

• Traffic

• Volume

• Horizontal curvature

• Functional classification

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Crash rate

• Critical rate

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 18 of 60

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:1

Available funding:2

Program: Sign Replacement And Improvement

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2020

What is the justification for this program? 

• Other-Clear Messaging and guidance

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• Volume • Functional classification

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Probability of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 19 of 60

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Available funding:1

Program: Skid Hazard

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2013

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes • Horizontal curvature

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Competitive application process

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 20 of 60

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:1

Program: Wrong Way Driving

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2013

What is the justification for this program? 

• Other-GDOT Focus

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Other-Available Funding

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes • Other-Interchange Design

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Probability of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Other-Systemic

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Available funding:1
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 21 of 60

Program: Other-Off System Safety

Date of Program Methodology:7/1/2019

What is the justification for this program? 

• Other-Support Local Government Road Safety Concerns 

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• All crashes • Other-Ownership

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Relative severity index

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

No

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

Because this is Off System Safety, State owned roads can't compete 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Competitive application process

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Available funding:2

Other-stakeholder interest:1

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements? 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 22 of 60

 9

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic 

improvements? 

• Add/Upgrade/Modify/Remove Traffic Signal

• Cable Median Barriers

• Clear Zone Improvements

• High friction surface treatment

• Horizontal curve signs

• Install/Improve Pavement Marking and/or Delineation

• Install/Improve Signing

• Pavement/Shoulder Widening

• Rumble Strips

• Wrong way driving treatments

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

• Crash data analysis

• Data-driven safety analysis tools (HSM, CMF Clearinghouse, SafetyAnalyst, usRAP)

• Engineering Study

• Road Safety Assessment

• SHSP/Local road safety plan

• Other-ICE

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

No

Over the past year we investigated how these technologies and data could be used to supplement our HSIP 

program. We have not leveraged this technology, but continue exploring the opportunities that connected 

vehicles offer. As we continue to investigate the impact of newer technologies, the state will incorporate 

various components that align to our program development.

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts?

Yes

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts.

GDOT has been working with our Numetric and engineering consultants to calibrate the state using our geolocated crash data loaded to our Numetric platform. We have been leveraging the Empirical Bayes method to 

identify roadways for analysis. Over the next several months we will be working to calibrate each of our seven 

districts. We will keep FHWA and our safety partners informed of our progress as we work with our network 

screening team and the web based crash analysis tools being developed by Numetric Inc. As part of the 

standard ranking criteria, the Numetric tools also include Equivalent Property Damage Only (ePDO) estimates 

for roads and road segments as well as a Relative Severity Index (RSI) and crash rate.
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 23 of 60

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed 

Reporting period for HSIP funding. 

State Fiscal Year

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category. 

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % 

OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $131,431,872 $131,431,872 100%

HRRR Special Rule (23 

U.S.C. 148(g)(1))

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

154)

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

164)

$0 $0 0%

RHCP (for HSIP 

purposes) (23 U.S.C. 

130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds 

(i.e. STBG, NHPP)

$0 $0 0%

State and Local Funds $28,928,597 $28,928,597 100%

Totals $160,360,469 $160,360,469 100%

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal 

safety projects? 

$11,628,606

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects? 

$7,000,000

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$1,314,549

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$1,000,000

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas 

during the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126? 

$28,928,597
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 24 of 60

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during 

the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$0

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in 

the future.

In previous years the state was challenged to obligate all available HSIP funds. We were often faced with 

projects being pushed into the next fiscal year because of design, ROW or environmental schedules. Over the 

past few years we have been actively improving our crash data, and we have enhanced project development 

and identification by executing our safety design contracts. This has allowed the HSIP team to actively seek 

out quality safety projects and advance them to the plan development process. By working closely with our 

design consultants and program delivery project managers, we have minimized the impacts created by shifting 

schedules. This helps to ensure that the department has the capability to deliver our annual HSIP 

commitments. 

We have accomplished these improvements to deliver and mitigate project delivery delays and scheduling 

impacts by working with the Office of Program Delivery (OPD) to ensure an efficient hand-off between the 

offices and clarify the plan delivery process. A project is transitioned from OTO Safety to OPD once a TE study 

has been signed. This is when the project is assigned a project identification (PI) number. A transition meeting 

is scheduled to discuss the project and what coordination needs to take place with other offices or agencies. 

Depending on the project size and complexity, additional meetings can be scheduled. A full or limited concept 

report is developed for most projects. This document provides additional information to confirm all applicable 

offices agree with the scope. Design on a project can start once a concept report is approved. Design may 

include one or several field plan meetings, scheduled at different stages of the design. This is to ensure the 

design is being done correctly. When the project package is complete the project is ready for construction 

letting. Once approved for letting, the project is sent out to GDOT prequalified contractors.
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 25 of 60

General Listing of Projects

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period.

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0000001 All Counties 

Identified PE-Safety

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous -

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$15745657 $15745657 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0000002 All Counties 

Identified ROWSafety

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous -

other

1 Safety Program 

ROW

$2925000 $2925000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0000003 All Counties 

Identified CST-Safety

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous -

other

1 Safety Program 

Construction

$8990915 $8990915 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0013258 Greene, 

McDuffie, Taliaferro 

SR 12; SR 17 & SR 

44 @ 9 LOCS -

PEDESTRIAN 

UPGRADES

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian signal 9 Intersections $200000 $200000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety

0013689 Paulding, 

Polk PEDESTRIAN 

UPGRADES @ 10 

LOCS IN PAULDING 

& POLK COUNTY

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian signal 10 Intersections $1148784 $1148784 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety

0017122 Fulton OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

4 LOCS IN SANDY 

SPRINGS

Roadside Barrier- metal 4 Locations $133861 $133861 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017338 All Counties 

ROAD SAFETY 

AUDITS - REGION A 

- FY 2022-2023

Miscellaneous Road safety 

audits

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$225000 $225000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0017339 All Counties 

ROAD SAFETY 

AUDITS - REGION B 

- FY 2022-2023

Miscellaneous Road safety 

audits

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$225000 $225000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0017340 All Counties 

ROAD SAFETY 

AUDITS - REGION C 

- FY 2022-2023

Miscellaneous Road safety 

audits

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$225000 $225000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0017341 All Counties 

TRAFFIC 

ENGINEERING 

STUDIES - REGION 

A - FY 2022-2023

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous -

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$1500000 $1500000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 26 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0017342 All Counties 

TRAFFIC 

ENGINEERING 

STUDIES - REGION 

B - FY 2022-2023

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$1100000 $1100000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0017343 All Counties 

TRAFFIC 

ENGINEERING 

STUDIES - REGION 

C - FY 2022-2023

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$1100000 $1100000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0017344 All Counties 

TRAFFIC OPS 

SAFETY PROGRAM 

SUPPORT - REGION 

A - FY 2022-2023

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$350000 $350000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0017345 All Counties 

TRAFFIC OPS 

SAFETY PROGRAM 

SUPPORT - REGION 

B - FY 2022-2023

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$450000 $450000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0017346 All Counties 

TRAFFIC OPS 

SAFETY PROGRAM 

SUPPORT - REGION 

C - FY 2022-2023

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$350000 $350000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0017347 All Counties 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENT 

PROJECT MOSD - 

REGION A - FY 2022-

2023

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$2300000 $2300000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0017348 All Counties 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENT 

PROJECT MOSD - 

REGION B - FY 2022-

2023

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$2300000 $2300000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0017349 All Counties 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENT 

PROJECT MOSD - 

REGION C - FY 2022-

2023

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$2300000 $2300000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0017350 All Counties 

CRASH DATA 

SOFTWARE & 

Miscellaneous Data analysis 1 Crash Data 

Software

$314549 $314549 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Systemic Data All
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 27 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

ANALYSIS 

SERVICES - FY 2022

0017699 Elbert OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

25 LOCS IN ELBERT 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

25 Locations $244540 $244540 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017700 Banks OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

29 LOCS IN BANKS 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

29 Locations $223509 $223509 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017701 Miller OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

12 LOCS IN MILLER 

CO - HRRR

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

12 Locations $290519 $290519 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017702 Randolph 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

10 LOCS IN 

RANDOLPH COHRRR

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

10 Locations $226452 $226452 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017703 Seminole 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

23 LOCS IN 

SEMINOLE COHRRR

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

23 Locations $219092 $219092 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017704 Franklin 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

35 LOCS IN 

FRANKIN CO-HRRR

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

35 Locations $297258 $297258 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017705 Richmond 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

18 LOCS IN 

RICHMOND 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

18 Locations $811978 $811978 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 28 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0017707 Houston 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

4 LOCS IN 

HOUSTON COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

4 Locations $268117 $268117 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017708 Henry OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

14 LOCS IN HENRY 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

14 Locations $232471 $232471 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017709 Coweta CR 

103; CR 465 & CR 

553 - OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS

Roadside Roadside grading 4.46 Miles $584148 $584148 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017710 McDuffie 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

19 LOCS IN 

MCDUFFIE COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

19 Locations $502084 $502084 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017711 Cobb OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

2 LOCS IN CITY OF 

ACWORTH

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

2 Locations $26747 $26747 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017712 Pickens 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

17 LOCS IN 

PICKENS COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

17 Locations $291113 $291113 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017713 Murray 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

18 LOCS IN MURRY 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

18 Locations $217159 $217159 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017714 Fulton OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

9 LOCS IN FULTON 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

9 Locations $93685 $93685 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 29 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0017715 Rockdale 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

12 LOCS IN 

ROCKDALE 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

12 Locations $212192 $212192 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017716 Baldwin 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

20 LOCS IN 

BALDWIN COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

20 Locations $478596 $478596 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017728 Liberty OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

16 LOCS IN LIBERTY 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

16 Locations $796225 $796225 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017742 Fulton OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

2 LOCS IN FULTON 

COUNTY

Roadway Roadway 

narrowing (road 

diet, roadway 

reconfiguration)

2 Locations $485604 $485604 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety

0017743 Fulton OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

3 LOCS IN FULTON 

COUNTY

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Rapid 

Rectangular 

Flashing 

Beacons (RRFB)

3 Locations $832329 $832329 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety

0017753 Polk OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

19 LOCS IN POLK 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

19 Locations $101685 $101685 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017957 Habersham, 

Lumpkin, Rabun, 

Towns 

MOTORCYCLE 

GUARDRAILS @ 11 

LOCS IN DIST 1 - 

AREA 4

Roadside Barrier - other 11 Locations $50000 $50000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018036 Jones OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

16 LOCS IN JONES 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

16 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0018037 Fayette 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

37 LOCS IN 

FAYETTE COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

37 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018038 Bibb OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

60 LOCS IN BIBB 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

60 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018039 Newton 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

16 LOCS IN 

NEWTON COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

16 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018040 Columbia 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

23 LOCS IN 

COLUMBIA COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

23 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018041 Burke OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

10 LOC IN BURKE 

COUNTY-HRRR

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

10 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018042 Hall OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

4 LOCS IN HALL 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

4 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018043 Dawson 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

3 LOCS IN DAWSON 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

3 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018046 Paulding 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

13 LOCS IN 

PAULDING COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

13 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 31 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0018048 Gordon 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

14 LOCS IN 

GORDON COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

14 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018049 Atkinson 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

17 LOCS IN 

ATKINSON COHRRR

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

17 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018050 Baker OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

21 LOCS IN BAKER 

CO-HRRR

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

21 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018051 Lanier OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

17 LOCS IN LANIER 

CO - HRRR

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

17 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018053 Tattnall 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

2 LOC IN TATTNALL 

CO - HRRR

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

2 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018092 Douglas 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

13 LOCS IN 

DOUGLAS COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

13 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018177 Fannin 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

19 LOCS IN FANNIN 

CO - HRRR

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

19 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018212 Fulton OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

6 LOCS IN FULTON 

COUNTY

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Rapid 

Rectangular 

Flashing 

Beacons (RRFB)

6 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 32 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0018221 DeKalb 

OFF-SYSTEM 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

11 LOCS IN DEKALB 

COUNTY

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

11 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018319 All Counties 

SAFETY 

INNOVATIVE 

INTERSECTIONS 

SUPPORT - PE 

ONLY

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$2000000 $2000000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018320 All Counties 

ROAD SAFETY 

AUDITS - REGION D 

- FY 2022-2023

Miscellaneous Road safety 

audits

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$150000 $150000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0018321 All Counties 

TRAFFIC OPS 

SAFETY PROGRAM 

SUPPORT - REGION 

D - FY 2022-2023

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$350000 $350000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0018322 All Counties 

SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENT 

PROJECT MOSD - 

REGION D - FY 2022-

2023

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$3000000 $3000000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0018323 All Counties 

TRAFFIC 

ENGINEERING 

STUDIES - REGION 

D - FY 2022-2023

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$1100000 $1100000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Spot All All

0018360 All Counties 

DISTRACTED 

DRIVING 

OUTREACH & 

AWARENESS

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Outreach

$1000000 $1000000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Systemic Data All

0019038 All Counties 

PED & BIKE SAFETY 

PLANNING & 

ACTIVITIES

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Safety Program 

Engineering

$700000 $700000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Systemic Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety

0019177 All Counties 

ALL WAY STOP 

CONTROL (AWSC) 

@ 29 LOCS IN 

DISTRICT 3

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

two-way stop to 

all-way stop

29 Intersections $20000 $20000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Systemic Intersections Intersection 

Safety
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 33 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0019178 All Counties 

ALL WAY STOP 

CONTROL (AWSC) 

@ 21 LOCS IN 

DISTRICT 6

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

two-way stop to 

all-way stop

21 Intersections $15000 $15000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 Multiple/Varies Systemic Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018329 Peach SR 

7/US 341 @ CR 

186/WOOLFOLK 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $450000 $450000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 4,130 35 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018326 Dougherty 

SR 234 FROM CS 

773/CEDAR AVE TO 

CS 664/W WHITNEY 

AVE

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Medians and 

pedestrian refuge 

areas

0.67 Miles $100000 $100000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther12,300 35 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety

0018335 DeKalb SR 

10 FROM SR 155 TO 

SR 10

Roadway Roadway 

narrowing (road 

diet, roadway 

reconfiguration)

1.85 Miles $750000 $750000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 16,600 35 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety

0015682 DeKalb SR 

8 FROM CSX 

#639758J TO CR 

1267/N PONCE DE 

LEON AVE

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous - 

other

1 Scoping Phase $800000 $800000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther28,300 35 State Highway 

Agency

Spot All All

0018052 Evans OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

1 LOC IN EVANS CO 

- HRRR

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,180 45 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0018332 Columbia 

SR 232 @ CR 

576/LOUISVILLE 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $700000 $700000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 6,330 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0015593 Fulton SR 

92 @ CR 

1374/BUTNER 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $1360000 $1360000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther11,200 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017966 Carroll SR 

61 @ COMMERCE 

DRIVE & @ 

MEADOWLARK 

DRIVE

Intersection 

geometry

Innovative 

Intersection (e.g. 

MUT, RCUT, QR)

1 Intersections $30000 $30000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 30,000 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018293 Clayton SR 

3/US 19 FROM I-75 

TO SR 54

Lighting Continuous 

roadway lighting

4.75 Miles $1054381 $1054381 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther66,500 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 34 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0017961 Clay SR 

1/US 27 @ SR 37

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $500000 $500000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther2,400 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017963 Colquitt SR 

33 @ CR 15/GENE 

MCQUEEN ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $370000 $370000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther2,540 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017960 Colquitt SR 

37 @ CR 

483/THIGPEN TRAIL

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $500000 $500000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,770 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018175 Hart SR 172 

@ CR 510/BIO 

CHURCH ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $700000 $700000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,820 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018330 Coweta SR 

54 @ CR 

547/GORDON ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $550000 $550000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,890 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018356 Brooks SR 

122 @ SR 133

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $450000 $450000 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,420 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018334 Barrow SR 

82 @ CR 139/CR 

267/BOWMAN MILL 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $700000 $700000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 3,610 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018333 Wilkinson 

SR 29/US 441 @ SR 

112

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $400000 $400000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther3,680 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017959 Mitchell SR 

37 @ CR 275/RIVER 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $450000 $450000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,700 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017967 Jefferson 

SR 88 @ SR 296

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $700000 $700000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,920 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017962 Lee SR 

3/US 19 @ CS 

507/CHURCH 

STREET

Intersection 

geometry

Innovative 

Intersection (e.g. 

MUT, RCUT, QR)

1 Intersections $400000 $400000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther6,200 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018325 Gordon SR 

225 @ CR 

483/NEWTOWN 

CHURCH ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $450000 $450000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 6,550 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 35 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0017968 Peach SR 

96 @ CS 

767/HOUSERS MILL 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $550000 $550000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 8,150 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017964 Whitfield SR 

286 @ CR 

670/DAWNVILLE 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $550000 $550000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 9,250 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0016469 Polk SR 

6/SR 101 @ COOTS 

LAKE

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $400000 $400000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther11,000 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018331 Barrow SR 

81 @ CR 410/TOM 

MILLER ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $600000 $600000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 14,500 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0013373 Muscogee 

SR 22 @CR 

1505/BRADLEY 

PARK DRDIVERGING 

DIAMOND 

INTERCHANGE

Interchange 

design

Innovative 

Interchange 

Modifications

1 Locations $14097284 $14097284 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 21,800 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017922 Bryan, 

Chatham I-95 FROM 

S OF CSX #635042S 

TO S OF 

EFFINGHAM 

COUNTY LINE

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Sign sheeting - 

upgrade or 

replacement

22 Miles $6378384 $6378384 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate0 65 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0019152 Banks, 

Franklin, Hart I-85 FM 

JACKSON CO LINE 

TO S CAROLINA 

STATE LINE @ SEV 

LOCS

Roadside Barrier- metal 56 Miles $40000 $40000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate0 70 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0017965 Carroll I-20 

@ SR 61 - DDI

Interchange 

design

Innovative 

Interchange 

Modifications

1 Locations $800000 $800000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 32,600 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017706 Toombs CR 

333 @ 1 LOC - OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS - 

HRRR

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

1 Locations $508283 $508283 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 710 45 County 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure

0009916 Richmond 

SR 88 @ CR 

58/BATH EDIE 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $2171367 $2171367 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 2,690 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 36 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0013685 Ben Hill SR 

90 @ CR 

250/LOWER 

REBECCA ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $5150016 $5150016 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,330 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0016348 Forsyth SR 

9 @ CR 3705/AC 

SMITH RD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $490000 $490000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 4,210 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0009966 Butts SR 42 

@ SR 87

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $70000 $70000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,230 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0013333 DeKalb I-20 

EB @ CS 

2776/MAYNARD 

TERRACE

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $2250960 $2250960 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 4,680 35 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0016113 Meriwether 

SR 41 @ CR 

174/JUDSON 

BULLOCH ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $220000 $220000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,700 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0015694 Carroll SR 

16 @ CR 212/CR 

833/BEULAH 

CHURCH ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $1180000 $1180000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 4,970 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0009928 Newton SR 

11 @ SR 142

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $1850000 $1850000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,620 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0013697 Henry SR 

81 @ CR 

434/JACKSON LAKE 

ROAD/CR 

656/SNAPPING 

SHOALS ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $4263400 $4263400 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther5,670 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0013197 Wayne CR 

396/RAYONIER 

ROAD @ CR 

392/SPRING GROVE 

ROAD - HRRR

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $580000 $580000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,800 45 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0009992 Fulton SR 

280 @ CS 

2645/NORTHWEST 

DRIVE

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $1790000 $1790000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 6,390 40 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0013861 Habersham 

SR 105 @ SR 115

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $410000 $410000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 6,410 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 37 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0009931 Barrow SR 

11 @ SR 211

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $4256885 $4256885 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 6,760 25 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0016356 Newton SR 

162 @ CR 

228/ROCKY PLAINS 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $650000 $650000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 6,890 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0015679 Douglas SR 

8 @ CS 352/CS 

968/CONNERS 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $1030000 $1030000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 7,070 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0016357 Laurens SR 

26 @ CR 

68/BETHLEHEM 

CHURCH ROAD - 

HRRR

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $330000 $330000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 7,080 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0009960 Bibb SR 22 

@ CR 

715/KNOXVILLE 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $2334963 $2334963 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther7,140 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0010428 Bulloch CR 

248/LANGSTON 

CHAPEL ROAD @ 

CR 585/HARVILLE 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $560000 $560000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 7,720 45 County 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0016106 Polk SR 6 @ 

SR 100

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $250000 $250000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther7,720 35 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0013882 Habersham 

SR 197 @ SR 385 IN 

CLARKESVILLE

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $1150000 $1150000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 8,290 35 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0015692 Bibb SR 87 

@ CR 742/BASS 

ROAD/CR 

85/ARKWRIGHT 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $590000 $590000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 8,750 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0016108 Carroll SR 

16 @ CS 

1110/COLUMBIA 

DR/CS 

1120/BRUMBELOW 

RD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $820000 $820000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 9,100 40 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0009967 Coweta SR 

14 @ SR 41

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $3191501 $3191501 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 10,500 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 38 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0013859 Newton SR 

11 @ SR 12

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $3035989 $3035989 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 10,500 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0016065 Jackson SR 

53 @ CR 433/NEW 

CUT ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $1470000 $1470000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 11,600 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017677 Fulton OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS @ 

1 LOC IN ATLANTA

Roadway Roadway - other 1 Multiple 

Countermeasures

$8000 $8000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 12,000 45 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety

0016117 Peach SR 

247 CONN @ CR 

83/CS 

668/HOUSERS MILL 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $420000 $420000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 12,300 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017956 Barrow SR 

11 @ CR 

125/MCELHANNON 

ROAD

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection 

realignment

1 Intersections $300000 $300000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 12,400 35 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018324 Fulton SR 

139 & CS 2328 

FROM CASCADE 

AVE TO MURPHY 

AVE

Roadway Roadway 

narrowing (road 

diet, roadway 

reconfiguration)

1.2 Miles $750000 $750000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 12,500 30 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety

0015592 Jackson SR 

11 @ SR 124

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $920000 $920000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 13,400 20 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018327 Bibb SR 

22/US 80 FROM CR 

5503/CANTERBURY 

ROAD TO I-75 SB 

RAMP

Roadway Roadway 

narrowing (road 

diet, roadway 

reconfiguration)

1.7 Miles $620000 $620000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther13,700 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety

0015844 Coweta SR 

14/US 29 @ CS 

2334/CORINTH 

ROAD IN NEWNAN

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $550000 $550000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 14,100 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017958 Rockdale 

SR 138 @ CR 

122/DIAL MILL 

ROAD

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $650000 $650000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther15,400 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0018328 Bibb SR 

22/US 80 @ I-75 SB 

RAMP

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $500000 $500000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther22,100 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 39 of 60

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

0017926 Fulton SR 

8/US 278 FROM SR 

280 TO CS 

6701/STIFF STREET

Roadway Roadway 

narrowing (road 

diet, roadway 

reconfiguration)

2.82 Miles $200000 $200000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther24,800 35 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety

0015686 Bibb SR 

11/SR 49 @ SR 247

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

1 Intersections $3167361 $3167361 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther31,000 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0009400 DeKalb SR 

13 FM CS 8/AFTON 

LANE TO CS 

750/SHALLOWFORD 

TERRACE-PH II

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists – other

2.6 Miles $18201270 $18201270 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther32,500 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Safety

0017517 Baldwin SR 

24 & SR 29 FROM CS 

643/HOLLY DRIVE 

TO CS 641/MELODY 

WAY

Roadway Roadway - other 1 Raised Median 

and access 

control

$375000 $375000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther36,700 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0013724 Fulton SR 

279 FROM CS 

567/SULLIVAN 

ROAD TO CS 

1615/JOLLY ROAD

Roadway Roadway - other 1 Raised Median 

and access 

control

$100000 $100000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther49,700 35 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Safety

0017955 Chatham I95 FROM CS 

565/POOLER PKWY 

TO CS 2223/JIMMY 

DELOACH PKWY

Roadside Barrier – cable 2.46 Miles $309159 $309159 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate82,900 70 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Road and 

Lane 

Departure
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 40 of 60

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends 

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five 

years. 

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Fatalities 1,180 1,164 1,432 1,556 1,540 1,505 1,492 1,664 1,840

Serious Injuries 4,694 4,446 4,896 5,206 5,370 6,401 7,308 7,625 8,654

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

1.081 1.045 1.214 1.280 1.219 1.142 1.128 1.439 1.525

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

4.301 3.993 4.152 4.282 4.251 4.856 5.523 6.593 7.171

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

209 183 226 265 274 296 268 312 338

Number of nonmotorized serious 

injuries

254 265 281 292 370 334 433 481 495
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 41 of 60

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Annual Fatalities

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Annual Serious Injuries

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 42 of 60

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 43 of 60

Describe fatality data source. 

FARS

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and 

ownership. 

Year 2021

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Interstate

61 570.8 0.79 7.41

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

0 0 0 0

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other

119.2 551.4 1.9 8.73

Rural Minor Arterial 137 780 2.39 13.6

Rural Minor Collector 36.8 190.4 1.58 7.85

Rural Major Collector 154.6 861.2 9.03 51.22

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Fatalities Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 44 of 60

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Local Road or 

Street

80.4 643.8 1.82 14.71

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

178.8 564.8 0.74 2.33

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

21.4 74.8 0.62 2.16

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other

295 913.6 1.72 5.34

Urban Minor Arterial 296 953.4 1.59 5.14

Urban Minor Collector 106.6 318.4 1.36 4.1

Urban Major Collector 0 0 0 0

Urban Local Road or 

Street

121 649 0.54 2.92
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 45 of 60

Year 2021

Roadways Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

State Highway 

Agency

1,057.8 4,409.6 1.44 5.99

County Highway 

Agency

435.2 2,055.2 1.31 6.19

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City or Municipal 

Highway Agency

114.8 606.8 0.66 3.59

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority

Local Toll Authority

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, 

University)

Indian Tribe Nation

Provide additional discussion related to general highway safety trends. 

Georgia DOT has been working with the SHSP TRCC / CODES and Data task teams to evaluate the coding of 

(A) Suspected Serious Injury data recorded on the state’s crash reports. We studied the consistency and 

alignment to EMS and hospital data. Based upon our findings, we reached out to our local FHWA and NHTSA 

representatives and advised them that we have updated our (A) Suspected Serious Injury quantities. It is the 

state’s desire to continually improve the quality of our reporting, and this report reflects the revisions to our (A) 

Suspected Serious Injury data. 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 46 of 60

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets

Calendar Year 2023 Targets *

Number of Fatalities:1680.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

While the 5-year rolling average number of traffic fatalities has steadily increased since 2014, Georgia 

experienced three consecutive years of decreases in the annual number of traffic fatalities between 2017 and 

2019. However, the traffic-related fatalities increased in 2020 and in 2021, perhaps as an indirect impact of the 

COVID-19 pandemic responses.

The state's goal Is to maintain traffic fatalities under the projected 1,680 (2019-2023 rolling average) by 2023

Number of Serious Injuries:8966.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The 5-year rolling average number of serious traffic injuries has steadily increased since 2014, with substantial 

increases in 2020 and 2021. Due to COVID-19 pandemic responses in 2020, there was less traffic volume and 

fewer vehicle miles traveled than in 2019. The increase in fatalities and serious injuries indicated that the traffic 

crashes that occurred tended to be more severe – indicative of drivers engaging in more risky driving 

behaviors such as speeding. In 2020, there was a 4 percent increase in the number of traffic-related serious 

injuries that occurred as a result of a motor vehicle crash on Georgia roadways according to police crash 

reports from 2019 to 2020.

The state's goal Is to maintain serious injuries in traffic crashes under the projected 8,966 (2019-2023 rolling 

average) by 2023

Fatality Rate:1.360

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Similar to the overall traffic fatalities performance measure (C-1), the 5-year rolling average traffic fatality rate 

per 100M VMT has steadily increased since 2014. Due to COVID-19 pandemic responses in 2020, there was 

less traffic volume and fewer vehicle miles traveled than in 2019. The increase in fatalities and serious injuries 

indicated that the traffic crashes that occurred tended to be more severe. Therefore, the rate of fatal injuries for 

every 100 million VMT increased in 2020; 34 percent increase in the fatality rate (from 1.12 in 2019 to 1.49 in 

2020)

The state's goal Is to maintain traffic fatalities per 100M VMT under the projected 1.36 (2019-2023 rolling 

average) by 2023.

Serious Injury Rate:7.679

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 47 of 60

Similar to the overall traffic fatalities performance measure (C-1), the 5-year rolling average traffic fatality rate 

per 100M VMT has steadily increased since 2014. Due to COVID-19 pandemic responses in 2020, there was 

less traffic volume and fewer vehicle miles traveled than in 2019. The increase in fatalities and serious injuries 

indicated that the traffic crashes that occurred tended to be more severe. Therefore, the rate of serious injuries 

for every 100 million VMT increased in 2020; 20 percent increase in the serious injury rate (from 5.47 in 2019 

to 6.58 in 2020).

The state's goal Is to maintain serious injuries in traffic crashes per 100M VMT under the projected 7.679

(2019-2023 rolling average) by 2023

Total Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries:802.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The 5-year rolling average number of non-motorized fatalities has steadily increased since 2011. The number 

of pedestrian fatalities increased by 18% from 236 in 2019 to 279 in 2020. Between 2016 and 2020, there was 

an average of 271 pedestrian fatalities each year. The number of bicyclist fatalities increased by 11 fatalities 

from 21 in 2019 to 32 in 2020. Between 2016 and 2020, there was an average of 25 bicyclist fatalities each 

year.

The state's goal Is to maintain the number of non-motorist serious injuries and fatalities under the projected 

802 (2019-2023 rolling average) by 2023

GDOT, GOHS, our state agency partners, and local organizations use the statewide five-year rolling average 

(2016-2020 FARS data) to determine the annual targets and progress status for each traffic safety 

performance measure. Specifically, the team plots the five most recent data points to determine the “best fit” 

model (linear or quadratic polynomial) that shows the relationship between the five-year rolling average and 

time. The model with the highest R2 value (reflective of a correlation between the five-year rolling average and 

time) is used to derive the FY2023 target values and determine FY2022 progress status. It’s important to note 

that five-year rolling averages are designed to smooth the data and reduce the variations that may appear in 

the raw annual time series; therefore, the correlation values (R2) are usually higher for models with the fiveyear moving average compared to models with annual raw values.

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

The public health emergency responses to the COVID-19 pandemic had unprecedented restrictions on travel 

in the state of Georgia. Due to the Governor of Georgia’s Executive Order declaring a public health state of 

emergency issued on March 14, 2020, a substantial proportion of the population did not travel, particularly on 

roadways and public transportation systems. Despite the decrease in traffic volume and fewer vehicle miles 

traveled in 2020, Georgia experienced an increase in traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries—indicative 

that traffic crashes tended to be more severe when they occurred, and drivers were engaging in more risky 

driving behaviors. Traffic-related data, such as VMT and motor vehicle crashes, show that the travel 

environment in Georgia is returning to the pre-pandemic norms as of early 2021.

Many traffic safety practitioners and data analysts consider the 2020 year to be an anomaly; however, the full 

impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on traffic safety is still unknown. The methodology used to determine the 

FY2022 traffic safety performance measures progress status and the FY2023 targets were not adjusted to 

address the rise in 2020 traffic fatalities due to the COVID-19 public health emergency responses. As such, the 

statistical projections show that many of the FY2022 targets were not met. Additionally, future targets that will 

be established may be distorted and perhaps overestimated since the 2020 anomaly will be included in the 5-

year rolling average analyses for fiscal years 2023-2028.
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 48 of 60

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish 

safety performance targets. 

GDOT met multiple times with Governor's Office of Highway Safety, FHWA, the State's MPO's, NHTSA and 

our safety partners. In particular, the SHSP data team conducted several CODES and Data Task Team 

sessions to review the state's data and the state's approach to developing performance targets. GDOT 

presented the finding and approach to GDOT Planning and the State's MPOs. Additionally, we held separate 

meeting with FHWA and NHTSA regional representatives to discuss our serious injury data analysis efforts. 

We highlighted how the updates to the serious injury data will impact to our performance measures and data 

reporting.

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

Describe progress toward meeting the State’s 2021 Safety Performance Targets (based 

on data available at the time of reporting). For each target, include a discussion of any 

reasons for differences in the actual outcomes and targets.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES TARGETS ACTUALS

Number of Fatalities 1715.0 1608.2

Number of Serious Injuries 6407.0 7071.6

Fatality Rate 1.230 1.291

Serious Injury Rate 4.422 5.679

Non-Motorized Fatalities and 

Serious Injuries

686.5 720.2

The public health emergency responses to the COVID-19 pandemic had unprecedented restrictions on travel 

in the state of Georgia. Due to the Governor of Georgia’s Executive Order declaring a public health state of 

emergency issued on March 14, 2020, a substantial proportion of the population did not travel, particularly on 

roadways and public transportation systems. Despite the decrease in traffic volume and fewer vehicle miles 

traveled in 2020, Georgia experienced an increase in traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries—indicative 

that traffic crashes tended to be more severe when they occurred, and drivers were engaging in more risky 

driving behaviors. Traffic-related data, such as VMT and motor vehicle crashes, show that the travel 

environment in Georgia is returning to the pre-pandemic norms as of 2021.

Many traffic safety practitioners and data analysts consider 2020 to be an anomaly; however, the full impact of 

the COVID-19 pandemic on traffic safety is still unknown. The methodology used to determine the FY2022 

traffic safety performance measures progress status and the FY2023 targets were not adjusted to address the 

rise in 2020 traffic fatalities due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. As such, the statistical projections 

show that many of the FY2022 targets were not met. Additionally, future targets that will be established may be 

distorted and perhaps overestimated since the 2020 anomaly will be included in the 5-year rolling average 

analyses for fiscal years 2023-2028.

Additionally, In 2016, the state adopted the MMUCC injury definitions. The new definitions were implemented 

through the state's revised crash report that was rolled out throughout 2018. Following the rollout, new and 

experienced officers were introduced to the new report along with the MMUCC injury definitions. It is 

understandable that adoption will take time considering that prior to the update, the state did not have a 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 49 of 60

serious injury value on the crash report. As more officers are trained on the MMUCC injury definitions the state 

expects to see gradual improved reporting. 

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

No

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries 65 

years of age and older for the past seven years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Fatalities

206 229 226 207 238 234 303

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Serious 

Injuries

298 314 344 406 556 557 700
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 50 of 60

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness 

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP? 

• Benefit/Cost Ratio 

• Change in fatalities and serious injuries 

• Other-Fatality Rates 

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of 

the State's program level evaluations.

Over the past several years GDOT has aggressively pursued quality safety projects and enhanced our total 

program. The state has been divided into three geographic regions being served by three separate engineering 

teams. This approach has promoted improved communication and coordination between the department’s 

central office and our districts. We have consolidated our safety program projects into a web-based database 

that will support program tracking from origin through the Plan Development Process (PDP). GDOT has 

adopted an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) policy to ensure safety and alternative design is a core 

consideration when evaluating intersection traffic control options. The Department has updated the 

specifications for high friction surface treatment to help ensure reliable and consistent construction practices 

are followed. We have worked closely with law enforcement, software developers, the Traffic Records 

Coordinating Committee (TRCC) working group and executive board to bring the state's crash report into 

closer alignment with MMUCC 5th edition. The improved report and associated software will provide our safety 

teams the data needed to advance our safety programs outlined in the SHSP. We have identified and collected 

curve data to meet the MUTCD requirements for curve signing and are scheduling implementation with our 

districts and engineering consultants. We have advanced our Numetric Inc. safety analytics software that 

incorporates the HSM EB methodology for ranking road segments and provides data analysis for our safety 

community. We have delivered an updated Pedestrian Streetscape Guide and Pedestrian Safety Action Plan 

to enhance pedestrian safety. Lastly, we have developed a Road Safety Audit Manual that will improve the 

selection and execution of RSAs. 

All of the efforts support the improved identification of standalone projects such as roundabouts, intersection 

turn lanes or (reduced conflict U-turns) R-Cuts to address intersection safety and projects that are systemic 

such as rumble strips, cable barrier, pavement marking and high friction surface treatment to address lane and 

roadway departure crashes. We have identified our pedestrian focus corridors and are delivering pedestrian 

hybrid beacons to address the states rising pedestrian fatality numbers. GDOT has identified interchanges that 

have common features and developed specific countermeasures to address wrong way driving crashes. 

Overall, the state has put several key elements in place to curb the rise in motor vehicle fatalities and serious 

injuries. We are confident that these efforts have and will have a positive impact on the lives of Georgia's road 

users and support our Vision Zero goal. 

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and 

success of the Highway Safety Improvement Program? 

• # RSAs completed 

• Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process 

• Increased focus on local road safety 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 51 of 60

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements 

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures. 

Year 2021

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Lane Departure 252.8 913.6 0.2 0.73

Roadway Departure 718.8 1,528.6 0.58 1.22

Intersections 323 1,830.6 0.26 1.47

Pedestrians 276.6 405.4 0.22 0.33

Bicyclists 21.6 56.6 0.02 0.05

Older Drivers 229.2 482.4 0.19 0.39

Motorcyclists 165 651.2 0.13 0.53

Work Zones 53.6 318.4 0.04 0.25

Data 1,607.8 7,071.6 1.31 5.68
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 52 of 60

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average

2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 53 of 60

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 54 of 60

Project Effectiveness 

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

0008375 SR 8/US 

78@ CR 

268/MANN 

RD/MASON 

CREEK RD & @ 

CR 808/POST RD

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection 

traffic control - 

other

56.00 25.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 42.00 4.00 102.00 30.00 13.08:1

0013870 OFFSYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS 

@ 21 LOCS IN 

WALKER COUNTY

Varies Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

512.00 384.00 8.00 6.00 24.00 24.00 285.00 219.00 829.00 633.00 105.06:1

0009887 SR 372 @ 

SR 369 - 

ROUNDABOUT

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

20.00 26.00 11.00 5.00 31.00 31.00 1.54:1

0015170 OFF 

SYSTEM SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENTS 

@ 46 LOCS IN 

BRYAN COUNTY

Varies Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

55.00 70.00 4.00 1.00 5.00 7.00 50.00 32.00 114.00 110.00 220.05:1

0009948 SR 52 @ 

SR 115/CR 

41/COPPER MINE 

ROADROUNDABOUT

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

9.00 8.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 13.00 10.00 3.92:1

0009953 SR 81 @ 

CR 461/CR 

462/BOLD 

SPRINGS ROADROUNDABOUT

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

20.00 15.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 26.00 20.00 5.06:1

0013175 SR 12 @ 

CR 5192/COVE 

LAKE 

ROAD/WELLBORN 

ROAD

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection 

geometry - other

68.00 71.00 2.00 2.00 38.00 39.00 110.00 110.00 108.32:1

0010419 SR 140 @ 

Hembree Rd

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control – 

Modern 

Roundabout

69.00 49.00 8.00 4.00 77.00 53.00 1.32:1

0008627 CR 

1300/Union Church 

Urban Major 

Collector

Roadway Pavement 

surface – high 

friction surface

34.00 35.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 13.00 45.00 48.00 18.32:1
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 55 of 60

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

Rd from SR 53 to 

SR 211 @ 5 Locs 
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 56 of 60

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative? 

 12/08/2021

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP? 

From: 2022 To: 2024

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update? 

 2024

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

*Based on Functional Classification (MIRE 1.0 Element Number) [MIRE 2.0 Element Number]

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY SEGMENT Segment Identifier 

(12) [12]

80 80 80 80 80 80

Route Number (8) 

[8]

100 100

Route/Street Name 

(9) [9]

20 20

Federal Aid/Route 

Type (21) [21]

100 100

Rural/Urban 

Designation (20) [20]

100 100 100 100

Surface Type (23) 

[24]

100 100 80 80

Begin Point 

Segment Descriptor 

(10) [10]

95 95 95 95 95 95

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11) [11]

95 95 95 95 95 95

Segment Length 

(13) [13]

100 100

Direction of 

Inventory (18) [18]

100 100

Functional Class 

(19) [19]

100 100 100 100 100 100
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 57 of 60

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Median Type (54) 

[55]

100 100

Access Control (22) 

[23]

100 100

One/Two Way 

Operations (91) [93]

100 100

Number of Through 

Lanes (31) [32]

100 100 100 100

Average Annual 

Daily Traffic (79) [81]

100 100 100 100

AADT Year (80) [82] 100 100

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4) [4]

100 100 100 100 100 100

INTERSECTION Unique Junction 

Identifier (120) [110]

80 80

Location Identifier 

for Road 1 Crossing 

Point (122) [112]

80 80

Location Identifier 

for Road 2 Crossing 

Point (123) [113]

80 80

Intersection/Junction 

Geometry (126) 

[116]

80 80

Intersection/Junction 

Traffic Control (131) 

[131]

80 80

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road 

(79) [81]

95 95

AADT Year (80) [82] 95 95

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139) [129]

80 80

INTERCHANGE/RAMP Unique Interchange 

Identifier (178) [168]

95 95

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

95 95
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 58 of 60

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (197) [187]

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201) [191]

95 95

Ramp Length (187) 

[177]

100 100

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195) [185]

95 95

Roadway Type at 

End Ramp Terminal 

(199) [189]

95 95

Interchange Type 

(182) [172]

95 95

Ramp AADT (191) 

[181]

100 100

Year of Ramp AADT 

(192) [182]

100 100

Functional Class 

(19) [19]

100 100

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4) [4]

100 100

Totals (Average Percent Complete): 93.89 93.89 83.75 83.75 97.27 97.27 94.44 94.44 94.00 94.00

*Based on Functional Classification (MIRE 1.0 Element Number) [MIRE 2.0 Element Number]

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026. 

Georgia is fortunate to have had forward thinking leadership which invested the time and resources to have established a reasonably complete geospatial inventory of all public roads well before ARNOLD or MIRE were introduced. 

Additionally, the department was one of the first to initiate the contract to implement ESRI’s Roads and Highways road inventory system. Based on the advantages introduced with the new system, the Georgia Department of 

Transportation, through the Office of Transportation Data, started a program in 2016 that is systematically verifying, updating, and collecting the MIRE fundamental data elements. This effort is being conducted in unison with the 12 

Georgia Regional Commissions, which cover the 159 Counties and 538 Cities within the state of Georgia. This multi-year, multi-agency effort will, in the end, provide more than the required 37 FDE for non-local paved roads, the 9 FDE 

for paved local roads, and the 5 required FDE for the unpaved roads
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 59 of 60

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

HSIP Implem Plan 2020_GDOT.pdf

Project Implementation:

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

Compliance Assessment:
2022 Georgia Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 60 of 60

Glossary

5 year rolling average: means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data 

(e.g. annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area: means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process.

Highway safety improvement project: means strategies, activities and projects on a public road 

that are consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous 

road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem.

HMVMT: means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects: are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule: applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which 

data are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013.

Performance measure: means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to 

monitor changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and 

objectives.

Programmed funds: mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification: means the process by which streets and highways are 

grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP): means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on 

safety data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148.

Systematic: refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across 

a system.

Systemic safety improvement: means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high 

risk roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types.

Transfer: means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.