alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ENVIRON International Corp. 8235 YMCA Plaza Drive, Suite 300, Baton Rouge, LA 70810 

V +1 225.408.2696 F +1 225.408.2747 

environcorp.com 

September 5, 2012 

USEPA Region 4 

Air Permits Section 

61 Forsyth Street SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 

Re: Statoil Gulf Services, LLC 

Title V and PSD Permit Application 

OCS Drilling and Exploration Activities 

Dear Sir or Madam:

On behalf of Statoil Gulf Services, LLC (Statoil), ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) is 

submitting the enclosed Title V and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit application 

for proposed exploratory drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. 

Specifically, Statoil is proposing to utilize one of two deepwater drilling vessels to conduct exploration 

activities in its DeSoto Canyon lease blocks, which are located east of the 87 degree, 30 minute 

Longitude beyond 25 miles of any state’s seaward boundary. Statoil proposes to use either the 

Maersk Developer (Developer) or Transocean Discoverer Americas (Discoverer Americas) 

dynamically positioned deep water drilling vessel and associated support fleet to perform exploratory 

drilling activities for up to 180 days per year in multiple locations within its DeSoto Canyon lease 

blocks. Mobilization of either the Developer or Discoverer Americas and associated support fleet is 

expected to begin July 1, 2013. 

The attached permit application seeks to obtain a permit under PSD regulations in accordance with 

40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 55.13(d)(2) and 40 CFR 52.21 and, therefore, we have 

included in this permit application all of the information and analysis required by 40 CFR 52.21. 

Additionally, the application seeks to obtain a Title V operating permit in accordance with 40 CFR 

55.13(f)(2) and 40 CFR 71, the federal Title V operating permit program. 

As required, ENVIRON is submitting 2 paper copies and 8 electronic compact disc (CD) copies of 

this permit application to the United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4. Additionally, 

an electronic CD copy of the permit application is being provided to the United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service Federal Land Manager. Finally, electronic payment for the required permit 

application fee in the amount of $27,229.58 is being made directly by Statoil. 

Please note that Statoil does not consider any information included in this application to contain trade 

secrets or commercial or financial information which is exempt from disclosure under 5 United States 

Code (U.S.C.) § 552(b)(4).
259 La. 60

#### Mrs. Shirley BEVERLY, wife of/and Clarence Beverly v. PHOENIX OF HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 51490.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1971.

In re: Mrs. Shirley Beverly, wife of/and Clarence Beverly applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 247 So.2d 269.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nicklebys.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Bruce Capra, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Bruce Capra                                          Bruce Capra			Chief Financial Officer			August 11, 2005

----
#### Ivy J. BONAVENTURE, et al. v. Sam FEDELE.

No. 8496.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

March 16, 1971.

In Re Ivy J. Bonaventure applying for writs of mandamus, prohibition and cer-tiorari.

Writs refused.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 99-701 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Treaty Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 

Signed at St. John’s October 31, 1996 

with 

 Exchange of Notes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Treaty signed at St. John’s October 31, 1996; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 3, 1997 (Treaty Doc. 105-24, 

 105th Congress, 1st Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 October 14, 1998 (Senate Executive Report No. 105-22, 

 105th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 October 21, 1998; 

Ratified by the President January 20, 1999; 

Ratified by Antigua and Barbuda June 17, 1999; 

Exchange of instruments of ratification at Washington 

 July 1, 1999; 

Entered into force July 1, 1999. 

With exchange of notes.
#### Harvey Herbert WILDGOOSE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-741.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 2, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Solomon Lee ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-85.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 25, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; William Clayton Johnson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Edward BERNDT and Andrea Berndt, Appellants, v. PLANNING DEVELOPMENT ASSOC., INC. and First National Bank and Trust Company of Riviera Beach, Appellees.

No. 76-1373.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 21, 1978.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr. of Campbell, Kap-ner, Colbath & Fine, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Herbert P. Benn of Blank, Williams & Benn, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, Edward Berndt and Andrea Berndt, sued the appellee, First National Bank and Trust Company of Riviera Beach, alleging that the bank wrongfully disbursed funds held in escrow. The trial court granted an oral motion to dismiss by the bank and dismissed the case with prejudice. A previous written motion to dismiss had been denied. At the time of the dismissal a copy of an escrow agreement setting out the responsibilities of the bank was before the court. When the escrow agreement is considered together with the allegations made by the appellant, it appears that the appellant could have stated a cause of action against the bank if granted leave to amend. We believe the trial court should not have granted the motion to dismiss with prejudice. Accordingly, the order of dismissal is hereby reversed with directions that the appellants, Edward and Andrea Berndt, be allowed a reasonable time to amend their complaint.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.

DAUKSCH, J., concurs in conclusion only.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3240 

To require senior Department of State officials to maintain security clearances 

and to require the Secretary of State to notify Congress when the 

security clearances of such officials are suspended or revoked. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2023 

Mr. HAGERTY (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. 

RUBIO, and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To require senior Department of State officials to maintain 

security clearances and to require the Secretary of State 

to notify Congress when the security clearances of such 

officials are suspended or revoked. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. 

4 In this Act: 

5 (1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMIT6 TEES.—The term ‘‘appropriate congressional com7 mittees’’ means the Committee on Foreign Relations 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3240 IS

1 of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

2 of the House of Representatives. 

3 (2) COVERED OFFICIAL.—The term ‘‘covered 

4 official’’ means any individual— 

5 (A) holding a position at the level of As6 sistant Secretary or higher at the Department 

7 of State; 

8 (B) holding the position of chief of mission 

9 or principal officer at any diplomatic or con10 sular post; 

11 (C) holding the rank and status of ambas12 sador; or 

13 (D) holding any other position that reports 

14 directly to the Secretary of State, such as spe15 cial envoy. 

16 SEC. 2. SECURITY CLEARANCES REQUIRED FOR SENIOR 

17 EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. 

18 All covered officials shall obtain and maintain a secu19 rity clearance that allows the covered official to access sen20 sitive compartmented information. 

21 SEC. 3. NOTIFICATION OF SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF 

22 CLEARANCES. 

23 If the security clearance of any covered official is sus24 pended or revoked, the Secretary of State shall— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3240 IS

1 (1) not later than 15 days after such suspen2 sion or revocation, notify the appropriate congres3 sional committees of the name and position of the 

4 individual whose security clearance was suspended or 

5 revoked; and 

6 (2) not later than 30 days after such suspen7 sion or revocation, provide a briefing for the appro8 priate congressional committees regarding— 

9 (A) the documentation notifying such indi10 vidual of such suspension or revocation; and 

11 (B) the current employment status and 

12 conditions of such individual. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, October 20, 1997.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Status Report of the Committee on the Federal Reserve in the 
Payments Mechanism (Alternative Roles for the Federal Reserve in the 
Retail Payments System).
    2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: October 10, 1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-27506 Filed 10-10-97; 3:09 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSRS

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-5689 |
|------------------------------------|----------|

 

DWS Multi-Market Income Trust

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 11/30 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 05/31/09 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
Scott, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company
 with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason
other than as specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
                                        August 15, 2005
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 2013 - Present MA Motor Vehicle Crash Report 2013

2 – Incapacitating A 39 Injury Status

Suspected Serious Injury 2005 - 2012 MA Crash Data Dictionary Attributes 2006

2 – Not Fatal Injury – 

Incapacitating 

A 32 – Injury Status codes found on Data Dictionary 

pg58 

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE STATE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 2005 - Present MA Motor Vehicle Crash Report 2013,

MA Motor Vehicle Crash Report 2005

Pedestrian 1 No definition found. 14 - Non Motorist Type code found on Report Form pg2.

Skater 3 No definition found. 14 - Non Motorist Type code found on Report Form pg2.

Pedalcyclist 2005 - Present

Cyclist 2 No definition found. 14 - Non Motorist Type code found on Report Form pg2.

Massachusetts
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Variable Series II, on Form N-CSR; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| February 25, 2008 | /s/Michael G. Clark    |
|-------------------|------------------------|
|              | Michael G. Clark       |
|              | President              |
|              | DWS Variable Series II |

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Variable Series II, on Form N-CSR; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| February 25, 2008 | /s/Paul Schubert                      |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------|
|              | Paul Schubert                         |
|              | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|              | DWS Variable Series II                |
#### Arthur Frank WIGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-874.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 4, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 54007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27512]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No.97-209, RM-9152]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Coarsegold, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed on behalf of Thomas L. Whitlock d.b.a. West Coast Wireless, 
seeking the allotment of FM Channel 233A to Coarsegold, California, as 
that community's first local aural transmission service. Coordinates 
for this proposal are 37-18-51 and 119-42-20.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before November 24, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before December 9, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: James A. Koerner, 
Esq., Baraff, Koerner & Olender, P.C., Three Bethesda Metro Center, 
Suite 640, Bethesda, MD 20814.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-209, adopted September 
24, 1997, and released October 3, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-27512 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-20-00181-CV

__________________

IN THE INTEREST OF I.E.

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 279th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-237,025

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

S.E. (Father) appeals from an order terminating his parental rights to his minor 

child, I.E. For a trial court to terminate a parent’s rights to his children, the State 

must prove by clear and convincing evidence (1) that the parent committed an act 

prohibited under section 161.001(1) of the Texas Family Code and (2) that 

terminating the parent’s rights is in the children’s best interest. See Tex. Fam. Code 

Ann. § 161.001(b)(1)-(2). Here, the parties tried the case to the bench, and the trial 

court found clear and convincing evidence supported the Department of Family and 

Protective Service’s allegations claiming Father’s rights should be terminated based 
2

on several grounds in section 161. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001(b)(1)(D), 

(E), (O), (P). The trial court also found that terminating Father’s rights is in I.E.’s 

best interest. See id. § 161.001(b)(2).

Father then appealed from the trial court’s order terminating his parental rights 

to I.E. Subsequently, Father’s court-appointed appellate counselsubmitted a brief in 

which counsel contends that no arguable grounds can be advanced to support 

Father’s appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In the Interest of 

L.D.T., 161 S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2005, no pet.). The brief 

provides counsel’s professional evaluation of the record. Counsel served Fatherwith 

a copy of the Anders brief filed on his behalf. After Father’s counsel filed the Anders

brief, the Court notified Father of hisright to file a pro se response, and the deadline 

to do so. Father did not respond to the Court’s notice. 

We have independently reviewed the appellate record. Based on the record 

before us, we find any appeal would be frivolous as there is no arguable error that 

would require the Court to have another attorney appointed to re-brief Father’s 

appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). For these 

reasons, we affirm the trial court’s order terminating Father’s parental rights.

AFFIRMED.

_________________________

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

 
3

 

Submitted on October 19, 2020

Opinion Delivered November 19, 2020

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.