Eades, Cassaundra

From: Lewis, Josh Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 1:08 PM To: Eades, Cassaundra; Mims, Kathy Cc: Mackay, Cheryl Subject: FW: Member Letter to Administrator McCarthy on Comment Period for upcoming GHG rule Attachments: Final GHG 120 day comment period letter.pdf

For CMS...

From: Orth, Patrick [mailto:Patrick.Orth@mail.house.gov] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 2:37 PM To: Distefano, Nichole; Lewis, Josh Cc: Baker III, John; Beukelman, Jan; Hart, Ryan (Rep. Jason Smith) Subject: Member Letter to Administrator McCarthy on Comment Period for upcoming GHG rule

Nichole and Josh — attached is a letter from 178 bipartisan Members of the House asking `for a comment period of at least 120 days on the forthcoming new source performance standards for existing coal-based power plants.' My boss, Mr. Johnson (OH), Mr. Thompson (MS), Mr. Smith, and Mr. Matheson were the 4 co-leads on the letter. I've copied the full list of names below since many signatures are hard to read. Please let us know if you have any questions and have a great holiday weekend.

Best regards,

Patrick

Patrick Orth Legislative Director Congressman Bill Johnson, OH-6 202-225-5705 patrick.orth2mail.house.gov

Bill Johnson Bennie Thompson Jason Smith Matheson Steve Daines Dennis Ross Walter Jones Tom Rooney Gene Green Reid Ribble Dave Jolly Collin C. Peterson Jim Costa Kevin CramerMario Diaz-Balart Jeff Miller (FL) Henry Cuellar Randy Hultgren David McKinley Steve Southerland Daniel Webster Ted Yoho John Duncan (TN) Lee Terry Steve Stivers Ander Crenshaw Stephen Fincher Ed Perlmutter Morgan Griffith Sam Graves Paul Broun James Lankford Vicky Hartzler Billy Long Bob Latta Tom Price Mac Thornberry Dan Benishek Steve King Steven M. Palazzo Jason Chaffetz Phil Roe Rob Bishop Mike McIntyre Robert Aderholt Bob Gibbs Dave Loebsack Shelley Moore Capito David Joyce Bill Huizenga Mark Meadows Gus Bilirakis Alan Nunnelee Trent Franks Spencer Bachus Pete P. Gallego Jackie Walorski

zBlaine Luetkemeyer Diane Black Tom Reed Patrick J. Tiberi Cynthia Lummis Mick Mulvaney Gregg Harper Aaron SchockIleana RosLehtinen Howard Coble Steve Pea rce Jeff Fortenberry Ann Kirkpatrick Keith Rothfus Robert Pittenger Cheri Bustos David Scott Tom Cole Adam Kinzinger Scott Garrett Markwayne Mullin Kristi Noem Mike Rogers (AL) Tim Walberg Ann Wagner Tom Graves Mark Amodei Charles Boustany Rick Crawford Ron Barber Mike Conaway Nick Rahall Duncan Hunter Jim Jordan Cory Gardner Sean Duffy Jack Kingston Tom Cotton Tim Huelskamp Scott DesJarlais Marsha Blackburn Lynn Westmoreland

3Lynn Jenkins Steve Womack Tim Griffin Paul Gosar Rob Woodall Michele Bachmann Austin Scott Phil Gingrey Tim Murphy Sanford Bishop Rich Nugent Tom Rice Martha Roby David Schweikert Don Young (AL) Jim Renacci Doug Collins (GA) Doug Lamborn John Barrow Andy Barr Mike Pompeo Tom Petri Tim Walz Charlie Dent Chuck Fleischmann Steve Stockman Frank Lucas Chris Collins (NY) William L. Enyart Kristen Sinema Scott Tipton Thomas Massie Mark Sanford Brad Wenstrup Ruben Hinojosa Randy Neugebauer Mike Coffman Luke Messer Richard Hudson Jeff Duncan John Kline Larry Bucshon Ron DeSantis Adrian Smith

4Todd Rokita Todd Young Glenn Thompson Robert Hurt G. K. Butterfield Joe Wilson Kurt Schrader Randy Weber Tom Marino Chris Gibson

Vern Buchanan Terri Sewell Raul Labrador Mike Simpson Susan Brooks Devin Nunes Rodney Davis Trey Gowdy Bradley Byrne Chris Stewart Cedric L. Richmond Danny Davis Tom Latham Wm. Lacy Clay Filemon Vila Emanuel Cleaver Renee Ellmers Joyce Beatry Virginia Fo>oc Steve Chabot Mike Turner John Shimkus Randy Forbes Marlin Stutzman

5Tunprrss nf t4e ant#jed ^s ittttPo NMS4itcgfoti, 33T 20515

May 22, 2014

The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460

We are writing to request that the Environmental Protection Ageiicy provide a sufficiently long comnient period on its upcoming regulation of greenhouse gases fiom existing power plants. The Agency should provide at least a 120 day comtnent period, given the significant impact this rule could have on our nation's electricity providers and consumers, on jobs in communities that have existing coal-based power plants, and on the economy as a whole.

The upcoming proposal will necessarily be more complex for the industry to deal with than the proposal for new plants, and stakeholders will need time to analyze the rule and determine its impact on individual power plants and on the electric system as a whole. This analysis will be no small undertaking, especially since this will be the first ever regulation of greenhouse gases from existing power plaints. Additionally, since the EPA extended the origina160 day comment period for the new plant proposal, it makes setlse to provide at least the same timeline for the existing plant rule.

.^ Affordable and reliable electricity is essential to the quality of life to our constituents. While we can a]1 agree that clean air is impoi-tant, EPA has an obligation to understand the impacts that regulations have on all segmetits of society. As one step toward fulfilling this obligation, lvvo urge you to provide for a comment period of at least 120 days on the-forthcoming new source performance standards for existing coal-based power plants.

Thank you for your consideratiori of this request.

Sincerely, 

# ^

PRINtEO ON AECYCLED PAPER

# _Qyk., 3^,.r -- ^ '► , '^ , , ^ `



# c/^-
^

, •.1%u_.

^



# 7cD— ,L,AD 

# ^



# 2 wi 

# kA %r y0000 G b 

# w —



# ^Piuu: ^ewekR,

# 4^WI. 

# ^

^ 2- (f) ^

^ ... 

## i



# V^.

# -^^M, 

# Mi.!.^

^

„



# ^ ^/,A lom^ ^.+^ ^ ^ 

# .-----^--

^



# ^^^



# ^^

^^^-

### E

--- ^ ^..r l ^ 

# ^ ;

# r4 FR - - !. I



# ^

^

,. ^ • ^

^

-

_^ ^^ .^ •. J ^ I / 

### C^t-c^,,.-----•

^ ^ • • ^

# r , . • I / '

,



# ,P..n./ / 

# ^°

## c..J^-^ ^it^a.l,^.s k,• 

# ^{^^

# . I / ^

^ 

## .`l^^ri►,

-r. ^ 

# ^
,^)(aa C^,

--

^^ ,/^^

## va



# ^ 

# 'i^.-4LC^

/ ^ =• 

# I 

# i <A,.,

44A

toe.5 

### (000-0,^,-

r

. 

# / -►.

__. /

# coik, ^^--^