alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: United  States--Gulf coast, Louisiana, Mississippi River, Venice to New  Orleans [electronic resource]
SuDocs Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> C 55.418/7:11364
Item    Number: 0191-B-13    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000868519
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-01-2012.jpg
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-01-2012.pdf
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-07-2001.jpg
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-07-2001.pdf
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-08-2004.jpg
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-08-2004.pdf
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-09-2007.jpg
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-09-2007.pdf
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-09-2009.jpg
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-09-2009.pdf
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-11-2002.jpg
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-11-2002.pdf
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-12-2005.jpg
 
 
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11364-12-2005.pdf
 
 [if !supportMisalignedColumns]>   [endif]>  
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  May 19, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### John ROBERTSON, Judge of the Municipal Court, City of Orlando, Orange County, Florida, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. Leon A. HARTY and John William Sampson, Appellees.

No. 2575.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 3, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 12, 1969.

Joseph X. DuMond, Jr., Orlando, for appellant.

Edward R. Kirkland, Orlando, for ap-pellees.

OWEN, Judge.

This case, like Davis v. Smith, District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, 227 So.2d 342, opinion filed this date, presents the question of whether F.S.1967, Section 322.-262(4), F.S.A., entitles a person, charged in municipal court with the offense of driving while under the influence of alcoholic beverages to the extent that his normal faculties were impaired, to a jury trial upon demand for such.

In the instant case, unlike the situation in Davis v. Smith, supra, the municipal judge was prohibited from exercising further jurisdiction because the relator had made timely demand for jury trial and the respondent municipal judge had apparently conceded that there was no authority under the municipal charter authorizing the Municipal Court of Orlando to impanel a jury and conduct a jury trial.

We affirm upon the authority of Davis v. Smith, supra. We expressly do not decide the question of whether the Municipal Court of Orlando has the means of providing a jury trial in this case as that question was not raised on this appeal.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and McCAIN, TJ-, concur
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Telegen Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew
      DeVries, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated
                as of March 28, 2008
            
            /s/
                Matthew DeVriesMatthew
                DeVries
              Chief
                Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1





STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF





BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.





In connection with the Quarterly Report of BGF Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James R. Henderson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/ JAMES R. HENDERSONJames R. Henderson President November 14, 2002
```

[House Document 113-57]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

113th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 113-57

 
             AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR LOCALITY PAY INCREASES

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

  AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR LOCALITY PAY INCREASES PAYABLE TO CIVILIAN 
  FEDERAL EMPLOYEES COVERED BY THE GENERAL SCHEDULE (GS) AND CERTAIN 
      OTHER PAY SYSTEMS FOR 2014, PURSUANT TO 5 U.S.C. 5305(a)(3)

    September 9, 2013.--Referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
              Government Reform and ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                       Washington, August 30, 2013.
Hon. John Boehner,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: I am transmitting an alternative plan for 
pay increases for civilian Federal employees covered by the 
General Schedule (GS) and certain other pay systems for 2014.
    Civilian Federal employees have already made significant 
sacrifices as a result of a three-year pay freeze. As our 
country continues to recover from serious economic conditions 
affecting the general welfare, however, we must maintain 
efforts to keep our Nation on a sustainable fiscal course.
    Accordingly, I have determined that it is appropriate to 
exercise my statutory alternative plan authority under 5 U.S.C. 
5303(b) and 5304a to set alternative 2014 across-the-board and 
locality pay adjustments. Specifically, I have determined that 
for 2014, across-the-board pay increases will be 1.0 percent, 
and the current locality pay percentages shown in Schedule 9 of 
Executive Order 13641 of April 5, 2013, will remain at their 
2013 levels. This decision will not materially affect the 
Federal Government's ability to attract and retain a well-
qualified Federal workforce.
    The adjustments described above shall take effect on the 
first applicable pay period beginning on or after January 1, 
2014.
            Sincerely,
                                                      Barack Obama.

                                  

```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 26 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 26

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the amendments 
 made to reporting of third party network transactions by the American 
                        Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 23 (legislative day, January 3), 2023

Mr. Hagerty (for himself, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Cramer, 
Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Lankford, and Mr. Braun) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the amendments 
 made to reporting of third party network transactions by the American 
                        Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop the Nosy Obsession with Online 
Payments Act of 2023'' or the ``SNOOP Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MODIFICATION OF EXCEPTIONS FOR REPORTING OF THIRD 
              PARTY NETWORK TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 6050W(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Exception for De Minimis Payments by Third Party Settlement 
Organizations.--A third party settlement organization shall be required 
to report any information under subsection (a) with respect to third 
party network transactions of any participating payee only if--
            ``(1) the amount which would otherwise be reported under 
        subsection (a)(2) with respect to such transactions exceeds 
        $20,000, and
            ``(2) the aggregate number of such transactions exceeds 
        200.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 6050W(c)(3) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``described in subsection 
(d)(3)(A)(iii)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
        apply to returns for calendar years beginning after December 
        31, 2021.
            (2) Clarification.--The amendment made by subsection (b) 
        shall apply to transactions after the date of the enactment of 
        the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3391 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3391

  To require the Postal Service to implement recommendations from the 
  Inspector General of the United States Postal Service for improving 
identification and notification of undelivered and partially delivered 
                    routes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 4, 2023

  Ms. Smith (for herself and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Postal Service to implement recommendations from the 
  Inspector General of the United States Postal Service for improving 
identification and notification of undelivered and partially delivered 
                    routes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Postal Delivery Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. POSTAL SERVICE REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS OF 
              THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.

    (a) In General.--The Postal Service shall review and, to the extent 
practicable, implement the recommendations of the Inspector General of 
the United States Postal Service with respect to undelivered and 
partially delivered routes contained in the report set forth by the 
Inspector General entitled ``Delivery Operations--Undelivered and 
Partially Delivered Routes'' (Report Number 21-262-R23) and dated 
December 16, 2022.
    (b) Deadline.--The Postal Service shall implement the 
recommendations described in subsection (a) not later than 1 year after 
the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
100 

98 

96 

94 

92 

90 

88 

86 

84 

82 

(I) 

0 

c: 80 

ro 

:::::: .E 78 

(/) 

c: 

ro 76 

.... 

1-

'#- 74 

72 

70 

68 

66 

64 

62 

60 

58 

56 

54 

3500 3000 2500 

Wavenumbers 

2000 1500 

-
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 2001 - Present

NJ Police Crash Investigation Report 2010 

(codesheet 2016),

NJ Police Guide for Preparing Reports of 

Motor Vehicle Crashes 2011,

2 - Incapacitated A Incapacitated: Victim has a non-fatal injury. Cannot walk, drive or normally continue the 

activities that they could perform before the motor vehicle crash. 86 Victim's Physical Condition

codes & definitions found on 

Manual pg24.NJ includes ANSI 

definitions on Manual pg51-59

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE STATE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 2011 - Present NJ Police Guide for Preparing Reports of 

Motor Vehicle Crashes 2011

Pedestrian P 2.2.36 pedestrian: A pedestrian is any person who is not an occupant. 83 Which Vehicle Occupied code found on Manual pg29, 

definition found on Manual pg55

Pedalcyclist 2011 - Present

Pedalcycle B 2.2.27 pedalcycle: A pedalcycle is a non-motorized other road vehicle propelled by pedaling. 

Inclusions: Bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, pedalcar and others 83 Which Vehicle Occupied code found on Manual pg29, 

definition found on Manual pg54

Pedalcycle 13 108/109 Vehicle Type

New Jersey
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 20-5338 September Term, 2020

1:19-cv-01730-ABJ

Filed On: July 23, 2021

James S. Bucholz,

Appellant

v.

Janet L. Yellen, in her official capacity as

Secretary of the United States Department of

the Treasury, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Rogers, Millett, and Katsas, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed September 10,

2020, be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that appellant failed to state a

claim that the assessment of the shared responsibility payment against him is a

violation of his due process rights under the Fifth Amendment. See 26 U.S.C. § 5000A;

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519, 575 (2012);

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons v. Sebelius, 746 F.3d 468, 470 (D.C.

Cir. 2014). Additionally, the only proper defendant in a refund suit is the United States,

see 26 U.S.C. § 7422(f), and appellant has not alleged a cause of action under the

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 702. The district court also correctly

concluded that appellant failed to state a cause of action under Bivens against the two

federal employees in their personal capacities. Appellant has not identified a

constitutional violation by these employees. See Association of American Physicians

and Surgeons, 746 F.3d at 470; Phillips v. Commissioner, 283 U.S. 589, 595 (1931). 
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 20-5338 September Term, 2020

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
#### Terina TAMARGO, Appellant, v. Richard TAMARGO, Appellee.

No. 76-1789.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 10, 1977.

Ralph W. Rinehart, Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied the appellee/hus-band’s-motion for modification of the final judgment of dissolution of marriage seeking to change custody of a minor child from the appellant/mother to the child’s paternal grandparents. The trial court did, however, award the paternal grandparents visitation rights. The award of visitation rights to a nonparent of a child whose custody has been awarded to a fit parent is without authority and is unenforceable. *Sheehy v. Sheehy,*325 So.2d 12 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

Accordingly, the order of the trial court is reversed.

McNULTY, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 13.1


             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  certification  set forth below is submitted in connection with  Futuremedia
PLC's  Form 20-F  annual  report  for  fiscal  year  ended  April 30,  2003 (the
"Report")  pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
1934,  as  amended  (the  "Exchange  Act') for  purpose of  complying  with Rule
13a-14(b)  or Rule  15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Mats Johansson, Chief Executive Officer of Futuremedia PLC, certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  represents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Futuremedia PLC.

Date:. November 17, 2003

/S/ MATS A I JOHANSSON
----------------------
Mats A I Johansson, Chief Executive Officer






                                     -1-
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 13.2


             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  certification  set forth below is submitted in connection with  Futuremedia
PLC's  Form 20-F  annual  report  for  fiscal  year  ended  April 30,  2003 (the
"Report")  pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
1934,  as  amended  (the  "Exchange  Act') for  purpose of  complying  with Rule
13a-14(b)  or Rule  15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Peter Machin, Chief Accounting Officer of Futuremedia PLC, certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  represents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Futuremedia PLC.

Date: November 17, 2003

/S/ PETER MACHIN
----------------
Peter Machin, Chief Accounting Officer







                                     -2-

<PAGE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls
o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 3 7 8

. LARELDA E. SHARD v. CREDI T A CCEPTANCE CORPORATI ON.

Th i s cas e w as d o ck et ed o n Oct o b er 2 3, 2 0 1 5 , m ak i n g t h e Ap pel l an t ’ s b ri ef an d

en u m erat i o n o f erro rs d u e o n No v em b er 12 , 2 0 1 5

. Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 2 2 (a) an d 2 3 ( a )

. On Decem

b er 1 6 , 2 0 1 5 , t h i s Co urt o rd ered Ap p el l an t to fi l e h er b ri e f a n d

en u m erat i o n o f erro rs b y Decem b er 2 6 , 20 1 5

. As o f t h e d at e o f t h i s o rd er, Ap p el l an t h as n ot fi l ed h er b ri ef an d en um erat i o n o f erro rs

. Th erefo re, up o n co n si d erat i on o f Ap p el l ee’ s M o t i o n To Di s m is s Ap p eal , t h e

s am e is h ereb y GRANTED an d t h i s ap p eal i s d i s m i s s ed as ab an d o n ed

. See Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 2 3 (a); Rees e v. S t a t e , 2 1 6 Ga. Ap p . 7 73 (4 5 6 SE2 d 2 7 1 ) (1 9 9 5 ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/14/2016 January 14, 2016
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jason Kellerman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



By:

/s/    JASON
KELLERMANName: Title:

Jason Kellerman Chief Executive Officer




I, Martin Roberts, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



By:

/s/    MARTIN ROBERTSName: Title:

Martin Roberts Vice President