alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27606]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Intent to Grant an Exclusive Patent License

    Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, Code of Federal 
Regulations, which implements Public Law 96-517, the Department of the 
Air Force announces its intention to grant Tel Med Technologies 
(hereafter TMT), a Michigan Corporation, an exclusive license, under 
United States Patent Application Serial No. 08/581/795 filed in the 
name of Stephen M. Schmitt for a ``Method of Fabricating Precise Cast 
or Noncast Implant-Retained Dental Restorations Using Electrical 
Discharge Machining.''
    The license described above will be granted unless an objection 
thereto, together with a request for an opportunity to be heard, if 
desired, is received in writing by the addressee set forth below within 
sixty (60) days from the date of publication of this Notice. 
Information concerning the application may be obtained, on request, 
from the same addressee.
    All communications concerning this Notice should be sent to: Mr. 
Randy Heald, Patent Attorney, Secretary of the Air Force, Office of the 
General Counsel, SAF/GCQ, 1501 Wilson Blvd., Suite 805, Arlington, VA 
22209-2403, telephone (703) 696-9037.
Barbara A. Carmichael,
Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-27606 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES

                                -----------------

                             DWS Mid Cap Growth Fund
                            DWS Small Cap Growth Fund

Effective immediately, the following information replaces similar information
about the portfolio management team in the "Portfolio management" section of
the funds' prospectuses:

The following people handle the day-to-day management of each fund:

Joseph Axtell, CFA                        Rafaelina M. Lee
Managing Director of Deutsche Asset       Director of Deutsche Asset Management
Management and Portfolio Manager of       and Portfolio Manager of the funds.
the funds.                                 o Joined Deutsche Asset Management
 o Joined Deutsche Asset Management in       in 1999 and the funds in 2008.
   2001 and the funds in 2006.             o Research analyst for US Micro,
 o Senior analyst at Merrill Lynch           Small and Mid Cap Equity: New
   Investment Managers for the               York.
   international equity portion of a       o Over 20 years of investment
   global balanced portfolio                 industry experience in US
   (1996-2001).                              portfolio strategy, Latin America
 o Director, International Research at       market strategy and US equity
   PCM International (1989-1996).            research at JP Morgan Securities,
 o Associate manager, structured debt        UBS Securities and Goldman Sachs &
   and equity group at Prudential            Co.
   Capital Corporation (1988-1989).        o BA, Columbia University; MBA,
 o Analyst at Prudential-Bache Capital       Stern School of Business, New York
   Funding in London (1987-1988).            University.
 o Equity analyst in the healthcare
   sector at Prudential Equity
   Management Associates (1985-1987).
 o BS, Carlson School of Management,
   University of Minnesota.





               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference




                                                                     [Logo]DWS
                                                                   INVESTMENTS
                                                           Deutsche Bank Group

August 14, 2009
DMF-3688
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25812]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory System
[Docket Nos. RP96-189-002 and TM98-1-73-002 (not consolidated)]

Ozark Gas Transmission System; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

September 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 19, 1997, Ozark Gas Transmission 
System (Ozark) filed to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets with respective July 
1, 1997, and October 1, 1997, effective dates:

First Revised Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 4
Second Substitute Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 4

    Ozark states that it is filing to revise this rate sheet to 
reflect: (1) Reduced rates effective July 1, 1997, in compliance with 
article I of the Stipulation and Agreement approved by the Commission 
in Docket No. RP96-189-000 on September 16, 1997; and (2) the new 
Commission-approved Annual Charge Adjustment (ACA) rate that will take 
effect on October 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make the 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the 
Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25812 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2747]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE


Notice of Transmittal of Sequestration Preview Report for Fiscal 
Year 1998 to Congress and the Office of Management and Budget

    Pursuant to Section 254(b) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 904(b)), the Congressional Budget 
Office hereby reports that it has submitted its Sequestration Preview 
Report for Fiscal Year 1998 to the House of Representatives, the 
Senate, and the Office of Management and Budget.
Stanley L. Greigg,
Director, Office of Intergovernmental Relations, Congressional Budget 
Office.
[FR Doc. 97-2747 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 97-0702-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2015

p0127 

# Order

Clerk January 30, 2015

In re DAWSON, Minors

. SC: 150781

COA: 320434

Saginaw CC Family Division:

11

- 033071

- NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questi ons presented should be reviewed by this Court.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302*
             Date: August 20, 2007By:

/s/
Robin ListName:
    Robin ListTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer 
 *
    
    The introductory portion of paragraph 4 of the Section 302 certification that refers to the
certifying officers responsibility for establishing and maintaining internal control over
financial reporting for the company, as well as paragraph 4(b), have been omitted in
accordance with Release No. 33-8760 (December 15, 2006) because the compliance period has been
extended for small business issuers until the first fiscal year ending on or after December
15, 2007.
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No.: DA 22

- 0504

KENNETH D. BENESH, Individually, as Trustee of the Ken and Gina Benesh Living Trust dated 1/3/2019, and on behalf of Rogue Barrels, LLC, a Montana entity,

Plaintiffs/Appellees,

vs.

MICHAEL A. HEBERT, Individually, and on behalf of Rogue Barrels, LLC, a Montana entity, and DOES 1

- 10

,

Defendant/Appellant,

ORDER

Bruce A. Fredrickson Angela M. LeDuc

R ocky Mountain Law Partners, P.C. 1830 3rd Avenue East, Suite 301

P. O. Box 1758 Kalispell, MT 59903

- 1758 Telephone: (406) 314

- 6011

Facsimile: (406) 314

- 6012

E

- mail: bruce@rmtlawp.com angie@rmtlawp.com Attorneys for Plaintiff

- Appellee Tyson A. McLean

Jordan A. Pallesi

K RIS A. M C L EAN L AW F IRM , PLLC 2315 McDonald Ave, Suite 106

Missoula , MT 59801 Telephone: (406) 396

- 9376

Facsimile: (406) 441

- 5497

Email: tyson@krismcleanlaw.com jordan@krismcleanlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant

- Appellant

Based upon Plaintiffs/ Appellees’ Motion for Extension of Time to file their

Answer Brief, and good cause appearing, 12/01/2022

Case Number: DA 22-05042 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellees shall file and serve their Answer

Brief to Defendant/ Appellant’s Opening on or before January 9 , 202 3

.

Electronically signed by:
Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 1 2022
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26703]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


National Defense Panel Meeting

AGENCY: DoD, National Defense Panel.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
meeting of the National Defense Panel on October 7 and 8, 1997. In 
accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App. II, (1982)], it has been 
determined that this National Defense Panel meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public from 0830-1700, October 7 and 8, 1997 in 
order for the Panel to discuss classified material.

DATES: October 7 and 8, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Suite 532, 1931 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Arlington, VA.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Defense Panel was established 
on January 14, 1997 in accordance with the Military Force Structure 
Review Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-201. The mission of the National 
Defense Panel is to provide the Secretary of Defense and Congress with 
an independent, non-partisan assessment of the Secretary's Quadrennial 
Defense Review and an Alternative Force Structure Analysis. This 
analysis will explore innovative ways to meet the national security 
challenges of the twenty-first century.

PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND AGENDA: The National Defense Panel will meet in 
closed session from 0900-1700 on October 7 and from 0900-1700 on 
October 8, 1997. During the closed session on October 7 from 0900-1000 
during the closed session, the National Defense Panel staff will meet 
with Donald Latham, Vice President Space Program Strategies & 
Integration, Lockheed Martin at the Crystal Mall 3 office. On October 8 
from 1300-1500 during the closed session the Panel will meet with 
General Max Baratz, US Army Reserves at the Crystal Mall 3 office. The 
remainder of the Panel's time will be used to discuss the NDP staff 
presentations on various future strategies, desired capabilities, and 
developing force elements.
    The determinaiton to close the meeting is based on the 
consideration that it is expected that discussion will involve 
classified matters of national security concern throughout.
    This Notification also is written verification that the Panel was 
unable to provide 15 day notification prior to the meeting date due to 
a newly scheduled meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact the National Defense 
Panel at (703) 602-4175/6.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-26703 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ESTATE OF MARJORIE C. SCHNELLER,

DECEASED

PETITION OF: JAMES D. SCHNELLER :

:

:

:

: No. 712 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of April, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
258 La. 343

#### Wilbert SMITH, P. M. B. 46179 v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51279.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1971.

In re: Wilbert Smith applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction. The guilty plea was made with benefit of competent counsel. Applicant’s proper redress is to the Pardon Board.
```

[House Report 113-240]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

113th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    113-240

======================================================================

 
RELATING TO CONSIDERATION OF THE JOINT RESOLUTION (H.J. RES. 59) MAKING 
 CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

 September 30, 2013.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

              Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, 
                        submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 368]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 368, by a record vote of 9 to 4, report the 
same to the House with the recommendation that the resolution 
be adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides that the House insists on its 
amendment to the Senate amendment to H.J. Res. 59, the 
Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014, and requests a 
conference with the Senate thereon.
    Section 2 of the resolution provides that any motion 
pursuant to clause 4 of rule XXII relating to H.J. Res. 59 may 
be offered only by the Majority Leader or his designee.

                            COMMITTEE VOTES

    The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion 
to report, together with the names of those voting for and 
against, are printed below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 77

    Motion by Ms. Foxx to report the rule. Adopted: 9-4.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Majority Members                      Vote               Minority Members               Vote
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ms. Foxx........................................          Yea   Ms. Slaughter.....................          Nay
Mr. Bishop of Utah..............................          Yea   Mr. McGovern......................          Nay
Mr. Cole........................................          Yea   Mr. Hastings of Florida...........          Nay
Mr. Woodall.....................................          Yea   Mr. Polis.........................          Nay
Mr. Nugent......................................          Yea
Mr. Webster.....................................          Yea
Ms. Ros-Lehtinen................................          Yea
Mr. Burgess.....................................          Yea
Mr. Sessions, Chairman..........................          Yea
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                  

```
#### Ex parte Myra Mae TURNER, etc.

SC 2781.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 30, 1977.

MADDOX, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER,. SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 19   Filed 10/24/06   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:06-cv-00169-MBC   Document 19   Filed 10/24/06   Page 2 of 2
Case 1:04-cr-00036-DSC   Document 241   Filed 04/18/07   Page 1 of 4

Case 1:04-cr-00036-DSC   Document 241   Filed 04/18/07   Page 2 of 4

Case 1:04-cr-00036-DSC   Document 241   Filed 04/18/07   Page 3 of 4

Case 1:04-cr-00036-DSC   Document 241   Filed 04/18/07   Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001077800
<NAME>                        Financial Intranet, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                     171,313
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           379,043
<PP&E>                                     1,116,368
<DEPRECIATION>                             871,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,590,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,382,166
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   46,231
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,162,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,590,914
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1,664,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         985,501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,643,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,643,481)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,020,932)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,664,413)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.09)



</TABLE>
#### Wesley Harry SLOBODIAN, Petitioner, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 39691.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 11, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 234 So.2d 151.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

   Board of Directors and
    Shareholders
   FCB Financial Corp.

   We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of FCB
   Financial Corp. of our report dated April 17, 1998,  relating to the
   financial statements of FCB Financial Corp. at and for the year ended
   March 31, 1998.

   We also consent to the incorporation of our report, included in this
   Annual Report on Form 10-K, into FCB Financial Corp.'s previously filed
   Form S-8 Registration Statements Nos. 33-82584 and 333-27135.

                                   /s/ Wipfli Ullrich Bertelson LLP   
                                 Wipfli Ullrich Bertelson LLP


   June 22, 1998
   Green Bay, Wisconsin
1The Honorable William G. Cambridge, United States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska, now retired.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2038

___________

Pat Hall, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* District of Nebraska.

Hormel Foods, Corp., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: April 4, 2001

 Filed: April 9, 2001

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Pat Hall appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment

in his action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans

with Disabilities Act, the Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act, and the Nebraska

Act Prohibiting Unjust Discrimination in Employment Because of Age. Upon our de

novo review, see Widoe v. Dist. #111 Otoe County Sch., 147 F.3d 726, 728 (8th Cir.
-2-

1998), we conclude the district court’s judgment was proper for the reasons stated in

its thorough opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Joseph R. THOMPSON, Jr., Petitioner, v. M R & R TRUCKING COMPANY and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38690.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 10, 1969.

Dale E. Rice of Campbell, Rice & Dcw-rell, Crestview, for petitioner.

J. Nixon Daniel, Jr., and Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 2, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for allowance of an attorney’s fee is also denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.