alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
08/19/201 0 14:2 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A + DM S @l001/00 2

UNITED STATE S DEPARTMENT O F TRANSPORTATIO N FIHDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

I n Lh e Matte r of : ROSLYN E MARI E ELDER , Responden

t * FAA Docke t CP10SW0004 *DMSFAA-2010-031 5 * * Hon . Isaa c D . Benki

n (ALJ ) / ; .; v 

# ^^i m

• - 0 

# : T

WITHDRAWA

L O F COMPLAIN T Th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA) , in accordanc e wit h Sectio n 13.21 5 o f

th e Rule s o f Practic e i n FA A Civi l Penalty Action.'? , hereb y withdraw s it s complaint . Thi s complain t i.s withdraw n becaus e partie s hav e reache d asettlemen t i n thi s matter . Date d thi s 4th day o f

August , 2010 . Respectfiill y submitted ,

LYNETT E WOR

D Regional Counse l Southwes t Regio n By : Yoland aAyal aBema l Agenc y Attorne y (817)222-507 008/19/201 0 14:2 9 FAX 202493514 2 FA A * DM S l2|002/00 2

CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t o n thi s dat e th e origina

l an d acop y o f th e Withdrawa

l o f Complain t wa. s maile d b y Federal Expres- s Mail to : Hearin g Docke t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Wilbur Wrigh t Building-Suit c 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 1 hereb y certif

y that acop y o f Withdrawa

l o f Complain t was sent vi afa x an d maile d thi. s dal e b y Federal Expres s Mail to : Th e Honorabl e Isaa

c D . Benkin , U.S . Administrativ e La

w Judg e Office of Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n Fa.s t Buildin g Groun

d Floor , Roo

mE12-E32 0 120 0 New Jersey Ave. , S.E . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 I hereb y certif

y tha t acop y o f Withdrawa

l o f Complain t wa s maile d thi s dat e b y Federal Expres s Mai l to : Roslyn e Mari e Elde

r 83 5 SierraVisl adrive , Apt . 32 6 La s Vegas , N

V 8916 9

Ga y Wttiltington , Managemwit an d Progra mAnalys t Federa l Aviatio n Admini.stratio

n For t Worth , TcAa

s 7613 7 Dated : Augus t

4 , 201 0
#### Walter J. MANLEY, Appellant, v. Jeanette MANLEY, Appellee.

No. 77-1118.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 12, 1978.

Bruce W. Jacobus of Ferrell & Jacobus, Melbourne, for appellant.

Edward L. Trader, Melbourne, for appel-lee.

DOWNEY, Chief Judge.

In this dissolution of marriage proceeding, initiated by the wife, the husband did not appear though served with process.

In her complaint the wife claimed the marital domicile because she alleged her mother had given the property to her and she needed it as a place of abode. The title to said property was held by the parties as tenants by the entireties. A default was entered against the husband and at the final hearing the only proof regarding the marital domicile was the following testimony adduced from the wife:

> “The house was given to us by my mother when we were married and I would like it to be returned to me.”

She was then asked:

> “Q Because of that gift, you feel you have a special equity in the house?

> “A Yes, I do, because my mother helped us several times to pay the payments on the house. My husband wasn’t working.”

In the final judgment the trial court found that the wife was entitled to a special equity in the marital domicile and thus it awarded her the husband’s entire interest *490in the home and furnishings. In addition, the judgment made a temporary order on visitation permanent. The temporary order had provided that the husband would have no visitation rights with his children until the final hearing, at which time visitation would be considered further.

Appellant raises two points on appeal: 1) the court erred in finding a special equity in the marital home and 2) the court erred in denying appellant visitation rights with his children.

The award of a special equity to the wife of the husband’s half interest in the marital home is unsupported in the record. True, the wife requested the house in her complaint and the husband did not answer. However, even in the face of a default by the defendant, a plaintiff in a marriage dissolution case must prove the allegations of the complaint and the entitlement to various property awards. 10 Fla.Jur., *Dissolution of Marriage, etc.,*§ 199. Here the only proof offered was that the wife’s mother made a gift of the marital house to both the husband and the wife and that title was taken jointly. No extended discussion is needed to demonstrate that this evidence falls far short of the quality necessary to prove a special equity. *Harrison*v. *Harrison,*314 So.2d 812 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1975).

Accordingly, the provision of the judgment appealed from which awards appellee a special equity in the marital home is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to reconsider the appellee’s prayer for monetary relief. Secondly, upon remand we direct the trial court to consider visitation rights for appellant and enter an appropriate order thereon. In considering those matters the trial court may take further testimony.

REVERSED AND REMANDED with directions.

DAUKSCH and MOORE, JJ., concur.
#### Charles Arthur GELIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-222.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 2, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Dreman Value Income Edge Fund, Inc., on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| May 30, 2008 | /s/Michael G. Clark                     |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------|
|         | Michael G. Clark                        |
|         | President                               |
|         | DWS Dreman Value Income Edge Fund, Inc. |

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Dreman Value Income Edge Fund, Inc., on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| May 30, 2008 | /s/Paul Schubert                        |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------|
|         | Paul Schubert                           |
|         | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   |
|         | DWS Dreman Value Income Edge Fund, Inc. |
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 24.4


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


The undersigned Trustee of The Town and Country Trust (the "Trust"), a Maryland
real estate investment trust, which anticipates filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Trust's
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, hereby constitutes and appoints HARVEY
SCHULWEIS, ALAN W. LASKER and DANIEL G. BERICK, and each of them, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, as attorneys or attorney to sign for
the undersigned and in my name, place and stead, as Trustee of said Trust, said
Annual Report and any and all amendments and exhibits thereto, and any and all
applications and documents to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pertaining to such Annual Report, with full power and authority to do
and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite, necessary or
advisable to be done in the premises, as fully and for all intents and purposes
as the undersigned could do if personally present, hereby approving the acts of
said attorney, and any such substitute.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of
February, 2005.


                                             /s/ Milton A. Wolf
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Milton A. Wolf
126 STAT. 268 PUBLIC LAW 112–100—MAR. 14, 2012 

Public Law 112–100 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To authorize the St. Croix River Crossing Project with appropriate mitigation measures to promote river values. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘St. Croix River Crossing Project 

Authorization Act’’. 

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECT WITH MITIGATION MEASURES. 

Notwithstanding section 7(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers 

Act (16 U.S.C. 1278(a)), the head of any Federal agency or department may authorize and assist in the construction of a new 

extradosed bridge crossing the St. Croix River approximately 6 

miles north of the I–94 crossing if the mitigation items described 

in paragraph 9 of the 2006 St. Croix River Crossing Project Memorandum of Understanding for Implementation of Riverway Mitigation Items, signed by the Federal Highway Administration on March 

28, 2006, and by the National Park Service on March 27, 2006 

(including any subsequent amendments to the Memorandum of 

Understanding), are included as enforceable conditions. 

SEC. 3. OFFSET. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 

amounts made available for items 676, 813, 3186, 4358, and 5132 

in the table contained in section 1702 of the SAFETEA–LU (119 

Stat. 1288, 1380, 1423) shall be subject to the limitation on obligations for Federal-aid highways and highway safety construction 

programs distributed under section 120(a)(6) of title I of division 

C of Public Law 112–55 (23 U.S.C. 104 note; 125 Stat. 652). 

(b) RESCISSION.—Any obligation authority made available until 

used to a State as a result of receipt of contract authority for 

the items described in subsection (a) that remains available to 

the State as of the date of enactment of this Act is permanently 

rescinded. 

SEC. 4. BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 

with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go-Act of 2010, shall be determined 

by reference to the latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of 

PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

St. Croix River 

Crossing Project 

Authorization 

Act. 

Mar. 14, 2012 

[S. 1134] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC LAW 112–100—MAR. 14, 2012 126 STAT. 269 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1134: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112–124 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

Jan. 23, considered and passed Senate. 

Feb. 29, Mar. 1, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior 

to the vote on passage. 

Approved March 14, 2012. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            7
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             8,583
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           71,025
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             71,805
<EQUITIES>                                         407
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  91,375
<CASH>                                          11,843
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              97,191
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           3,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 343,580
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                179,955
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             85,863
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 22,005
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            8,525
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   343,580
<PREMIUMS>                                     101,680
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,647
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   5
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,401
<BENEFITS>                                     112,396
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     24,764
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             2,963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,146)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (14,456)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,527)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.66)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  45,209
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             89,038
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                               23,357
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              39,286
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                35,554
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 82,764
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                         23,357
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52576-52577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26678]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Infrastructure, Methods & Science Studies; 
Notice of Meetings

    This notice is being published in accord with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended). During the period October 
1, 1997 through December 31, 1998, the Advisory Panel will be holding 
panel meetings to review and evaluate research proposals. The dates, 
contact person, and types of proposals are as follows:

Advisory Panel for Infrastructure, Methods & Science Studies (#1760)

    1. Date: October 26-27, 1997.
    Place: Holiday Inn City Center, 181 West Broadway, The 
Broadhurst Room, Tucson, AZ 85701.
    Contact: Dr. Rachelle Hollander, Program Director for Societal 
Dimensions of Engineering Science & Technology, Division of Social, 
Behavioral & Economic Research, Room 995, 703-306-1743.
    Type of proposal: Societal Dimensions of Engineering, Science & 
Technology Studies.
    2. Date: November 21-22, 1997.
    Contact: Dr. Edward J. Hackett, Program Director for Science & 
Technology Studies, Division of Social, Behavioral & Economic 
Research, Room 995, 703-306-1742.
    Type of proposal: Science & Technology Studies.
    3. Date: December 8-9, 1997.
    Contact: Dr. Cheryl L. Eavey, Program Director of Methods, 
Measurement & Statistics, Division of Social, Behavioral, and 
Economic Research, Room 995, 703-306-1729.
    Type of Proposal: Methods, Measurement & Statistics.
    Times: 8:30 to 5:00 p.m. each day.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meetings: Closed.

[[Page 52577]]

    Purpose of Meetings: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the 
Directorate as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 USC 552b(c) (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26678 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. PANNING LUMBER AND SUPPLY CO., Inc., Relator, v. The Honorable Roger A. BARKER, as Judge of the Circuit Court, Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Orange County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-157.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 3, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1970.

Writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO OF HUNTCO INC. AT AND FOR 
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                               21
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                    44,109
<ALLOWANCES>                        530
<INVENTORY>                      92,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                138,754
<PP&E>                          180,796
<DEPRECIATION>                   37,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  293,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            67,726
<BONDS>                         102,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                       4,500
<COMMON>                             90
<OTHER-SE>                      110,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    293,231
<SALES>                         391,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                391,181
<CGS>                           369,864
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   369,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    228
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                8,113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (6,735)
<INCOME-TAX>                     (2,444)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (4,291)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     (4,291)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.50)
        

</TABLE>
# Server Hangup
Exhibit 12.1

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Carlos Aguirre G., certify that:

 

1.          I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 20-F of Grupo Radio Centro, S.A.B. de C.V.;

 

2.          Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.          The company’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for thecompany and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c) Evaluated the effectivenessof the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this report anychange in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.          The company’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

Date: April 27, 2012