alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 113–49—NOV. 13, 2013 127 STAT. 577 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3302: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013): 

Oct. 22, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 31, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–49 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Bay Pines, Florida, 

as the ‘‘C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL 

CENTER, BAY PINES, FLORIDA. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Bay 

Pines, Florida, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act 

be known and designated as the ‘‘C.W. Bill Young Department 

of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. Any reference to such medical 

center in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other 

paper of the United States shall be considered to be a reference 

to the C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

Center. 

Approved November 13, 2013. 

Nov. 13, 2013 

[H.R. 3302] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                  36,258
<SECURITIES>                            42,186
<RECEIVABLES>                           12,699
<ALLOWANCES>                            (128)
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        87,589
<PP&E>                                  6,510
<DEPRECIATION>                          (3,297)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          95,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   20,535
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                94,399
<OTHER-SE>                              (19,384)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            95,626
<SALES>                                 9,163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        12,116
<CGS>                                   195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        10,866
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        12
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,283
<INCOME-TAX>                            31
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,252
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,252
<EPS-BASIC>                             .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .05



</TABLE>
Exhibit (f)(1)

**RETIREMENT AGREEMENT**

 

[New York Board Form]

 

This Retirement Agreement (“Agreement”), dated as of November 14, 2007, is made by and between ________________ (“Independent Director”) and each of the DWS Scudder Funds listed in Schedule A attached hereto (“Funds”).

WHEREAS, the Independent Director has served as an independent trustee or director of certain of the Funds for a significant number of years;

WHEREAS, in accepting this position, the Independent Director has reserved time in his or her schedule of commitments sufficient to meet the requirements of such service and, accordingly, has forgone or not pursued other opportunities for compensated service;

WHEREAS, the Board of each of the Funds has concluded that it would be desirable and in the best interests of the Fund to create a unified board structure where the board members of  the Funds and those of other DWS Scudder Funds would be primarily the same individuals (the “Consolidated Board”);

WHEREAS, pursuant to a Plan of Consolidation adopted by the Board of each Fund, the effective date for the Consolidated Board is expected to be April 1, 2008 (the  "Consolidation Date");

WHEREAS, the Board of each of the Funds has expressed its willingness to elect up to four nominees currently serving on boards overseeing other DWS Scudder Funds in order to constitute the Consolidated Board;

WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the elections of nominees currently serving on other boards, the Independent Director has volunteered to resign as a director of each Fund as of the Consolidation Date;

WHEREAS, unlike other fund complexes, the Funds have not adopted plans providing for any retirement or pension benefit for their trustees or directors;

WHEREAS, the Board of each of the Funds has determined that in consideration of the Independent Director’s voluntary decision to retire as a trustee or director of the Funds prior to the normal retirement date specified in the current retirement policy of the Funds, his or her past service to the Funds, and the other covenants contained herein, it is desirable and appropriate in the circumstances to provide a one-time retirement benefit to the Independent Director; and

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 304 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 304

  To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the use of Federal 
   funds for the salaries or expenses of political employees if the 
President's annual budget submission to Congress is late, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2023

 Mr. Marshall introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the use of Federal 
   funds for the salaries or expenses of political employees if the 
President's annual budget submission to Congress is late, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Presidential Accountability for 
Yearly Submission of The United States' Budget Act'' or the ``PAYSTUB 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR POLITICAL EMPLOYEE 
              SALARIES AND EXPENSES IF PRESIDENT'S BUDGET IS LATE.

    Section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(j)(1) If the budget under subsection (a) is not submitted to 
Congress on or before the first Monday in February of a year, for 
service by any political appointee during the period beginning on the 
first Tuesday of February of such year and ending on the date the 
budget is submitted, no Federal funds may be obligated or expended for 
the salary or expenses of the political employee.
    ``(2) Each political employee whose salary and expenses are not 
paid by operation of paragraph (1) shall be paid for the period the 
limitation under such paragraph was in effect at the employee's 
standard rate of pay, at the earliest date possible after such period 
ends, regardless of scheduled pay dates.
    ``(3) In this subsection, the term `political employee' means any 
individual--
            ``(A) occupying a position described under sections 5312 
        through 5316 of title 5 (relating to the Executive Schedule);
            ``(B) serving under a noncareer appointment in the Senior 
        Executive Service, as defined under paragraph (7) of section 
        3132(a) of such title; or
            ``(C) occupying a position in the executive branch of the 
        Government of a confidential or policy-determining character 
        under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5, Code of 
        Federal Regulations.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Thomas Dozier SIKES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1394.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 3, 1973.

Jones, Blitstein & Aschenbrenner and Allen L. Jocobi, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant was tried before a jury and convicted of possession of burglary tools.

*18On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in not granting defense counsel’s motion for continuance.

It is a general rule that the trial judge is vested with broad discretion in matters of a requested continuance, and by virtue of his closeness and intimacy with the circumstances of the case he will not be reversed on appeal unless there is a clear showing of a palpable abuse of this judicial discretion. Matera v. State, Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 180. The record on appeal does not show any abuse of this discretion nor does it appear that the defendant was prejudiced by the court’s refusal to grant the requested continuance. Therefore, this argument of appellant must fail.

We also have considered appellant’s remaining points on appeal and find them to be without merit.

Accordingly, the judgment herein appealed must be and hereby is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Presidential Documents

54335

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 201

Friday, October 17, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 7041 of October 15, 1997

International Rural Women’s Day, 1997

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Our world has been continually uplifted and renewed by the contributions

of women. Women of courage and conscience, women of strength and compassion, women of vision and talent have enriched every aspect of international society. In our own Nation, the names of such extraordinary individuals as Harriet Tubman, Susan B. Anthony, Jane Addams, Rosa Parks, Dolores

Huerta, and so many more, are etched on our history and in our hearts.

But there are millions of other women who live and work among us whose

names will never be known, but whose efforts and energy contribute profoundly to the quality of our lives. Rural women are numbered among

these many quiet heroes.

Today rural women comprise more than one-quarter of the world’s population, and they form the basis of much of the world’s agricultural economy.

In the United States, working on farms and ranches, they play a vital

part in ensuring a healthy, safe, and abundant supply of food and fiber

for our people. In developing countries, as small farmers, laborers, and

entrepreneurs, rural women help produce most of the food, create many

of the jobs, and manage most of their countries’ natural resources. While

millions of rural women worldwide live below the poverty level, struggling

to survive with scarce resources and little training and education, they

still manage to feed their families and contribute to their communities.

When the international community came together in Beijing in 1995 for

the Fourth United Nations World Conference on Women, rural women made

their voices heard by world leaders, and their hard work and sacrifice

were at last recognized by people across the globe. Next year, when the

United States hosts the Second World Conference on Women in Agriculture,

we will continue to focus on the status of rural women and their contributions

to our world.
54336 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 1997 / Presidential Documents

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 15, 1997, as

International Rural Women’s Day in the United States. I call upon the

American people to observe this day with appropriate programs and activities

in recognition of the extraordinary contributions rural women make to the

quality of our lives, both in America and around the world.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifteenth day

of October, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-seven,

and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 97–27814

Filed 10–16–97; 11:12 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and twenty-second.

œ–
#### JIM-ROY DEVELOPMENT CO., Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Relators, v. James D. PARKERSON, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 2682.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

Feb. 13, 1969.

Writ Granted March 13, 1969.

Writ Refused April 25, 1969.

*540J. Minos Simon, Lafayette, for plaintiffs-relators.

James J. Morrison, New Orleans, for defendant-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

An application for supervisory writs is required to be accompanied by legible copies of the order or ruling complained of, and of the court’s reasons for his order or ruling, if they be in written form. Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, Rule XII, Section 4(e), (f). An opposition is made on the ground, inter alia, that this requirement is not met.

If the rulings and reasons are represented only by minute entries or untran-scribed oral pronouncements, they are not required to be attached to the application by the court rule cited. We are unable, however, to determine from the application and opposition whether the ruling and reasons were in writing or were merely oral.

Accordingly, we delay consideration of the application for supervisory writs pending its supplementation, if so required to accord with Rule XII, Section 4, especially Section 4(e), (f). The applicant is given five days to supplement the application, if so required, or to make showing that no such supplementation is required, with his application to be dismissed if such supplementation or showing is not filed with this court on or before February 19, 1969.

Our consideration of the application for supervisory writs is not to preclude the trial court from continuing with further proceedings in the case.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

August 30, 2019.

In t he



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00222- CV

IN RE MARK ANTHONY FORNESA; JUDY THANH FORNESA; RICARDO FORNESA, JR.; AND CYNTHIA FORNESA, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Court at Law No. 1 Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17- CCV -060874



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 28, 2018, relator s Mark Anthony Fornesa ; Judy Thanh Fornesa ; R icardo Fornesa, Jr.; and Cynthia Fornesa filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. The2

respondent is the Honorable Christopher G. Morales , presiding judge of County
Court at Law No

. 1 of Fort Bend County

. The underlying case was appealed to this court, and relators’ remedy, if any, is through the appeal. See Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992) ; Fornesa v. Fifth Third Mortg. Co. , No. 14- 18 -00045- CV (Tex. App.—Houston [14 th Dist.] filed Jan. 24, 2018). We deny the requested relief. All other pending motions are denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise , Zimmerer, and Spain

.
#### Guido H. FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. Niki GALANOS and John Fatolitis, Appellees.

No. 69-95.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 5, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2751]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Military Health Care Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Military Health Care Advisory Committee.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 28, 1997 (62 FR 4036), the Department of Defense 
published a notice announcing a meeting of the Military Health Care 
Advisory Committee. This meeting has been POSTPONED until mid-March, 
due to scheduling conflicts which have not permitted full attendance by 
Committee members. All other information remains unchanged.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gary A. Christopherson, Senior 
Advisor, or Commander Sidney Rodgers, Special Assistant to PDASD, 
Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), 1200 
Defense Pentagon, Room 3E346, Washington, DC 20301-1200; telephone 
(703) 697-2111.

    Dated: January 29, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-2751 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         683,229
<SECURITIES>                                 2,340,210
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,221,375
<PP&E>                                       1,311,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                 134,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,469,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          453,088
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,312
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,913,497
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,469,897
<SALES>                                         66,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,911
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,016,732
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,922,188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,922,188)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### EKL-MARA, INC., a Florida Corporation, d/b/a Universal Health Studios, Appellant, v. Maria T. GAUNA, Appellee.

No. 77-2251.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 23, 1977.

Rohan & Rohan, Miami, for appellant.

Sussman & Granda, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HAVÉRFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in the trial court having appealed an order of dismissal with prejudice and the defendant having filed a confession of error before the filing of the record in this court, therefore, in order to expedite the disposition of the cause, the order appealed is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for such further proceedings as he shall find proper.

Reversed and remanded.
**Exhibit 31.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS**





I, Donald R. Katz, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Audible, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(3) and 15d-115(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and





b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:





a) A ll significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting





August 13, 2004
By:
/s/ Donald R. KatzName:
Donald R. KatzTitle:
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-625

________________________________________________________________________

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION

Environmental Protection

Memorandum of Understanding

Between the

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 and CHINA

Signed at Cincinnati June 25, 2012

with

Annex
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof

or authentication thereof.”
 CHINA

Scientific Cooperation: Environmental Protection

 Memorandum of understanding

signed at Cincinnati June 25, 2012;

 Entered into force June 25, 2012.

 With annex.